490032_PERMIT FILE_20171231

T6vy-, gff� �Zv/o
5�y

D?J � d 0 wi � C9 buy

I
MROA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William R. Bell
Joli-Bell Farm
175 Nabors Road
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Bell:
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
June 17, 2010
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-0696
15A N.C.A.C. 2T. 1304
Joli-Bell Farm/Facility 49-32
Individual Permit AWI490032
Iredell County
On May 26, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Joli-Bell Farm and the permitted waste disposal system.
We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T.1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by permit. At the time of the inspection, waste was
observed to be into the Freeboard. Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of Individual Permit
Condition III.9, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please
submit a written response to this Notice by June 30, 2010. Please include in your response all
actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Division of Water Quality 1 Ag0er.Pmteclion section) Mooresville Regional Office One
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 361, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-87T623-6748 ���������
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org
Art Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Joli-Bell Farm/Facility 49-32
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
June 17, 2010
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a- recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated May 26, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AW1490032
Regional Permit File AWI490032
ib

I
0 Division of Water Quality
Ej Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490032 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1490032 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type; Corrofiance._Insoection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _„- County: Irede11 Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 05126/2010 Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time: 03:30 PM
Farm Name: Joli-Bell Farm
Owner: William R Beli _ ^�
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 175 Nabors Rd Statesville NC 266778577
Physical Address: 352 Nabors Rd
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Sfatesville NC 286778577
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3 '44'30” _ Longitude: 80°48'44"
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road. General
location: 3.5 miles east of Statesvilte.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment ij Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William R Bell Operator Certification Number: 21924
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Wiillam R. Bell
On-site representative William R. Bell
Primary Inspector: James .
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Date: &
Page: 1

Permit: AVV1490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
05120!08 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.7 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/30/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.9 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/11/08 > Soil Analysis
4. Facility Operator advised to pump down Storage Pond ASAP!
24. Calibration of waste appfication equipment scheduled in June, 2010.
31. Failure to notify QWO of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV to follow.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
8
Page: 2

.1
Permit: AM490032 Owner - Facility: William R Beil
Facility Number : 490032
Inspection Date: 05/2612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n .
Discharge originated at:
or closure plan?
Structure
n
n
v
n
Application Field
n
n
■
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
®
o
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
®
n
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5 Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I e./ large trees, severe
non
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
v
n
n
8 Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
a
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding? n
Wydra0c Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Meavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AW1490032 Owner - Facility: William R Sell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? I_l
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? 0
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Plan(CAWMP)?
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for fand application?
Q
®
n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4
ll

f
Permit: AVV1490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 05!2612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routlne
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? n
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n p n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stacking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
D
■
n
n
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
!�
❑
IN
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
25. Did the facility fait to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
In
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
®❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PIAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
®
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AW}490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Facility Number : 490032
Inspection Date: 05!26!2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues
Yes
No
NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n
■
n n
Quality representative immediately. ,
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ cf emergency situations as required by Permit?
01100
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
0000
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
■
n n
Page: 6

.,, FILE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED June 17, 2010
William R. Bell
Joli-BeII Farm
175 Nabors Road
Statesville, NC 28677
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-0696
15A N.C.A.C. 2T-1304
Joh-Bell Farm/Facility 49-32
Individual Permit AWI490032
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Bell:
On May 26, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Joli-Bell Farm and the permitted waste disposal system.
We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge pen -nit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T. 1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by permit. At the time of the inspection, waste was
observed to be into the Freeboard. Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of Individual Permit
Condition I11.9, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP),
Required Corrective Action for Violation I.-
In
:In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please
submit a written response to this Notice by June 30, 2010. Please include in your response all
actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section ! Mooresville Regional Office One
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NOrthCarohna
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] t Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org ,X%f 111,71111
An Equal Opportunily) Affirmafrve Acton Employer

Joli-Bell Farm/Facility 49-32
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Jnoc 17,2010
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Beane or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
�\
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure. Compliance Inspection Report dated May 26, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWI490032
Regional Permit File AW1490032
ib

r
Division of Water Quality
j 7 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 490032 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1490032 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qomoliance IrsoecLiQnInactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 05/26/2010 Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time: 03:30 PM Incident #:.
Farm Name: J li-Bell f=arm Owner Email:
Owner: Willl,am R Bell Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 175 Nabors Rd Statesville NC 286778577
Physical Address: 352 Nabors Rd Statesville NC 286778577
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant N Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°44'30" Longitude: 80°48'44"
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road. General
location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: William R Bell
Secondary OIC(s):
W Waste Collection & Treatment ji Waste Application
jj Other issues
Operator Certification Number: 21924
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name William R. Bell Phone: [phone]
On-site representative William R. Bell
Primary Inspector: James
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Ext 2162 t..
Date: h j'%)j -g' ..�'y
Page: 1

Permit: AW1490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number : 490032
Inspection Date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
05/20/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.7 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/30/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.9 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/11/08 > Sod Analysis
4. Facility Operator advised to pump down Storage Pond ASAP!
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in June, 2010.
31. Failure to notify DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit, NOV to follow.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
jb
Page: 2

I
Permit: AVV1490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number : 490032
Inspection pate: 0512612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n In
b, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DVJQ) n n ■ n
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE.
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
■
n
In
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
In
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
�!
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AVV1490032 Owner - Facility: WiJam R Bell Facility Number : 490032
Inspection Date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? In
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1 Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 Timothy, Orchard, 8
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
o
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
o
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrlgation design or wettable acre determination?
o
■
In
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
o
■
In
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
In
❑
20 Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page 4
r

r
Permit: AW1490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 05/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
WUP?
n
Checklists?
n
Design?
�]
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
In
■
n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on Irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
®
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
Q
® n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
®n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
0 n
^LL- -_ i__..__
Yac
Nn
NA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ {n n
29 Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n n n
mortality rates that'exceed normal rates?
Page:5

Y
Permit: AW1490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Inspection Date: 0512612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
■
n
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/Inspection with on-site representative?
D
■
n
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
113
■
Cl
n
Page: 6

4f f,
O Division of Water Quality
Facility Number �(�� � Z 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservati 6
Other Agency - �ff 1
Type of Visit 49 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure.Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit # Routine . O Complaint Q f=ollow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: /t, Arrival Time: Deporwre Time: �Counly:.� I2egion:.._,'_�!t.
Farm Name: .v. _._.. v Z} ` � � � �j. Owner Email:
Owner Marne: Phone: _._....._.__..------._......._.__........_,...__,.,.._.._..._..
MailingAddress: ---..__..... ._.M.—.--___........._..•_....._.__._�..... _....._...__....__
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: _ Integrator:..-.___......-..-....._....._..._...._._____,..._..___.. _.__._.— _
Certified Operator: _ _ �'? �.._ �_..__. w �... __'__._..._.. Operatar Certification Dumber: __.._._. ---
Back-up Operator: __. _- ..•,_.__....-....__-. ..___.__.,._. Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude; ° ` Loneitude: °
- Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ )~arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Boars
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
T _ ❑ La er '
{ ❑Non -La er
Dry Poultry
Layc
Non -
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Stricture ElApplication Field ElOther
CD
a. Was the coriveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dai
❑ Beef Stockei
0 -Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
Number of Structures: ILI
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) '
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No❑ NE
El yes ED No - ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElY No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

A
Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
a• If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
• Identifier:
❑ Yes
Spillway?:
❑ NA
❑
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ NA
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ NA
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ No
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑ N
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination"
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ N
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ N
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ N
r�ll2� lS v� V\j
17 �/V
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued
1 ��

Facility Number: — Dare Dr In'-pection
Required ]Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily av ' 7 es -d ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropirate box.
ecklists El Design El Maps ❑ father
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriale box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E
❑ Waste Application ❑Weekl of Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certifi
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking [:10,13, ' Yspe Weather C
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Add. Comments and/or Drativings
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
NE
on
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1 ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
12/28/04

irWENR
North Carolina Department of Environmei
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wal<iid, P.E.
Governor Director
December 12, 2012
William (Rex) Bell
Joli-Bell Farm
175 Nabors Road
Statesville, NC 28677
it:anarNaiural-Ke ources, -=:
.W.�Dee Freeman
ii F'Secretary
U DEC19 ;
1�... l,3FrV[:?.-,R�,taifer i�ratsrrtiar _�;
Subject: Rescission of Animal Waste Permit
Permit No. AWI490032
Joli-Bell Farm
Iredell County
Dear William (Rex) Bell:
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit with the
submission of a completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form on
Decemebr 10, 2012. Staff from our Regional Office has confirmed that this permit is no longer
required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Permit No. AWI490032 is rescinded,
effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you must first
apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal.
waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will
subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
cc: EMooresvil eeRegional_Office,_Aquifer_Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
Permit File AWI490032
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
Location. 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] } FAX; 91 M07-6492
Internet: www.ntwaterqualitv.om
An Equal Opportunity 1 ABfrmaM Action Employer
A74(rally e hCarolina

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denled Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: -- -�� {����.......���, _ Owner Email -
Owner Name: ,��� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Region:
Onsite Representative:
'``
Certified Operator: Vv ti� �'�,.�`t9AA
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
ntegrator:
Operator Certification Number: _
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
='
❑ Longitude: =0=s °0s
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry- Capacity Population Cattle ,Capacity ,Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Boars
Ot ier°
❑ Other
❑
Layer
❑ Non -La ei
r
Dry Poultry -
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkex Poults
❑ Other
❑ Dairy Cow I 3SU
❑ Dai If I `1
❑ Dai Heifer 22'S
❑ Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:. E— ]
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes CNo❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No) ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[INo ❑ NE
ElYezo
NA E] NE
El Ye ❑ NA [INE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment /�
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? q des ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Structure 6
Identifier: IFI � zf
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): (�y
k
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? ��"
El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El El NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes NA
F-1NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑ NA
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
❑ NA
Waste Application
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
10. Are there any required u r corn liance alternatives that need ❑ Yes DNA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvem n .
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN - ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C -a N-\ Cs, 1A�� , W 4�'`l (gio!l Y\ rwm/,;�
s
13 • Soil type(s) S fNl F C
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yeo
❑ NA
El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ElYes
❑ NA
ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'![]1O_
Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes,�to
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
v i(9��` . i „ti# � s ;w u:�' .' �. "- •'�i $ �.: '. � , 'E i 6.�; _ ;+- * :t;., � .. , , t.,_ � ; f ., t h9 L;!� �T. '.�'���Gj IM", i .
IIsdawings�oftacitxly to better eplam situations_ l{use addihonal pages,as necessary}.F �k�i`..M1Y If F
IVA,ca:tZ, :k/Ht-2s,>
Reviewer/Inspector Name r i y '" f ' rr '�`a Phone
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

i-* Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents <4W>
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of CovP�a�e.�;; it readily available? ❑ Yesio ❑ NA EINE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, c k El Yes
NA [:1 NE
the appropirate box. � wUP ❑ c lists ❑A gn ❑er
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
DV'aste Application eekly freeboar� aste Analysis o� Analysis aste Transfers rtification
mute nspec i < am n e
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes to E] NA [:1 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑-, �s Yes [:]No ` ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate tea lication a ui ment as required by the permit? % 1d�1❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? �❑ Yes ❑ No �kA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? G4 !D
❑ Yes''iso ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yeo ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ yeka7�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem?
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Genefal-Permit? (ie/ discharge, fregjoard nrQhleins over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
[]Yes NA
❑
El NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
_'_e,.., p j T4
Additional Comme{nts and/or. Drawings''+}
1i1/I
_ffi��
L 1
12/28104

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FORM for HIGH WASTE LEVELS ao
IN STRUCTURES AT ANIMAL FACILITIES'" fry
�z
f-7
Facility Number:- County: ° Q
Facility Name:
Certified operator Name: �[ f A-_ ji Operator #:
Date that High Waste Level Was Initially Reported to DWQ: 0
DWQ Contact Name:
Current Situation
1. List the current waste level(s) as measured from the waste level in the lagoon/storage pond to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for structures without spillways; and from the waste level in the
structure to the bottom of the spillway for structures with spillways. Also list the quantity of waste
above the maximum liquid mark (also called "start pump").
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure Name/ID:
Spillway (yes or no): e�
Waste Level (inches):
Above Maximum Mark (inches):
=_--
Dam is Slumping or Seeping (yes or no):
Mitigating Factors
2. Brief summary (incl. date, type, and amount) of precipitation events contributing to high waste level:
- 0 C2
3. Date of most recent waste application event:
4. Per the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), how is animal waste land -applied at
your facility (e.g. solid spreader, irrigation, honey wagon, slurry truck)?
Evaluation of Waste Mana ement System
5. If applicable, has the catt a lot and barns been inspected for leaking drinkers? Have repairs been
made? `
v ��Q s A)� AN,"15 sr N c e 41 D off
6. If applicable, is there enough guttering on the barns to exclude fresh water from the waste
structure? If not, when is installation or repairs to be made?
�-5
High Wa e Level POA Form-Mar2010

7 .,jf applicable, is the diversion ditch around the waste structure functioning properly and excluding all
,f resh.water from the structure?
,
8'�Descbe all methods employed to contain the waste or to exclude it from surface waters (e.g. berm,
ditch, retention hole, alternate application method, removal of cattle to pasture):
t
Proposed Strategy Y ! � e. �' g S4 e'r . 76 r ted
P 10 �kp1tty Q(r
9. Describe moisture conditions in the field (e.g. standing -water, application equipment mars down in
field, "trafficability" across the soil, soils able to absorb application without runoff, application fields
frozen and/or snow cover d):
P lcd �0 5
10. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, What is the earliest possible date that land application
could commence?
x,
11. Do you have a waste analysis obtained within 60 days of application?
Lo //0 0��
r
12. Proposed receiving crop(s), acreage, and application window(s):
a2. S A)
13. Is waste to be pumped and hauled to an off-site location? if so, list the volume and PAN content of
the waste to be hauled as well as the proposed site(s) with their related facility number, number of
acres, receiving crop information, etc. Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water
Quality prior to transfer of waste to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste plan.
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above, and to the best of my knowledge
and ability, t7e information is accurate and correct. _
l ! !tom �e. �f Phone:
X14
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
9.0
Date: 2e
Facility 0 per/Manager (signature)
High Waste level POA Farm-Mar2010

CDEH
North Caroiina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
William (Rex) Bell
Joli-Bell Farm
175 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677-8577
Dear Mr. Bell:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
, October 6, 2009
LJ
Subject: Permit No. AW1490032
Joli-Bell Farm
Animal Waste Management System
iredell County
OCT -8U9
In accordance with your March 30, 2009 request for a zero animal permit, we are hereby forwarding to
you this Permit issued to William (Rex) Bell authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system. You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to zero until such
time as the waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished to maintain it
as an active cattle farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Joli-Bell Farm Farm, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
annual average of zero (0) cattle.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014 and replaces the COC
No. AWC490032 issued to this facility on November 24, 2004. You are subject to the conditions of this
permit until the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a
letter to the Division of Water Quality to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a 100 -ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit -or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
location- 2726 Caoitai Blvd- Raleiqh, North Carolina 27604
Phone; 91(;.733-3221 1FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-677.623-6745
Internet: www.nmaterquality.org
An Eau.I Opportunity . Al maive Artlntt Emr3byer
One
N©rthCaft)lina
,A17atural4if
Ip

V
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be fled at least 180 days prior to expiration.
~ 4N This Permit is 'not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
k . ' the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
Vkfns'facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
I Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone]:
Sincerely,
7Z- A�
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (Record -Keeping Forms Package)
cc: Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Notebooks
Permit File AW1490032

Ob
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL CATTLE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
William (Rex) Bell
Iredell County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Joli-Bell Farm farm
located in Iredell County, consisting of zero (0) cattie and the application to land as specified in the
Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters,'wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25 -year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
?. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 2B, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.
Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.1013(l) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.

Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case-by-case basis by the Division.
H. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.
9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.

014
10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
18. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased). etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REOUIREMENTS
1. An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.

N
Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application.
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
4. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on-site or record
the off-site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
5. If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition IIl. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on-site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition lll. 3.
6. A copy of this Permit, the Facility's permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.
v

w
r
7. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
9. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
b. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V. 2. of this Permit.
C. Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
d. Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
Any failure of the animal waste management system that renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
f. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting'after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of tlie'occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.

i
IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
I
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25 -year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25 -year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure or
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.
Y

0.
r
4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit.
This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revolting and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
7. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111(c). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 6th day of October, 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
.far Coleen H. Sullins, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AW1490032

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490032 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490032 _ ❑ denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection .. Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Iredeli -- Region: Mooresville _
Date of Visit: 09/04/2009 Entry Time:02,00 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: oii-Bell Farm Owner Email:
Owner: William 8 Bej Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 175 Nabors Rd Statesville NC 286778 77
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°44'30" Longitude: 80°48'44"
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road. General
location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William R Bell Operator Certification Number: 21924
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name William R. Bell
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
On-site representative William R. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext.216 ��
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/20/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.7 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/30/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.9 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/11/08 > Soil Analysis
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
C
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Inspection Date: 09/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf 75 0
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 225 0
Cattle - Dry Cow 50 0
Cattle - Milk Cow 350 0
Total Design Capacity: 700
Total SSLW: 811,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 24.00 48.00
Page: 2

i
Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 09/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ ❑ n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
n
■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Q
❑
■ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
❑ ❑ .
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection,_ Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
G
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks; or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

R
Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Belt
Inspection Date: 09/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NB
PAN? zIn
Crop Type 5
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
n
Crap Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
n
n
Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage, for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q
■
n
fl
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
❑
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

I
Permit: AVVC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number : 490032
Inspection Date: 0910412009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? n
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)
n
❑
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Dict the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
Cl
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
❑
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
❑
0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

I
Permit: AWC490032 Owner- Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 09!04!2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0 ■ Q Cl
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ri ■ 13 Cl
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
■
n
n
Page. 6

r
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490032 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490032 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comobance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: IreQell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 03/05/2008 Entry Time: 11 M -A Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident tt:
Farm Name: ,oli-Beil Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Wiliam R Bell
Phone: 704 -a72 -963.8 -
Mailing Address. 175 Nabors Rd Statesville NC 286778577
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant n Not Compliant
Location.of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°44' 0" Longitude: 80°48'44" _
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road. General
location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville.
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: William R Bell
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Operator Certification Number: 21924
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name William R. Bell
Phone: [phone]
On-site representative William R. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: �gd�Date:,
Secondary Inspector(s).
Inspection Summary:
10/30/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.9 Lbs11000 Gallons
06/25/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.7 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/05/07 > Soil Analysis
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: Wham R Bell
Facility Number: 490032
1,
r
Inspection Date: 03105/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Cattle
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle - Dairy Calf 75 32
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 225 110
Cattle -Dry Cow 50 20
Cattle - Milk Cow 350 168
Total Design Capacity: 700
Total SSLW: 811.250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pond WSP 24.00 43.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 03/05/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? r1 ■ Q n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
nn■n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
D
■
fl
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Cl
0011
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
MOO
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or.
❑
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
D
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? Cl
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? Q
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Inspection Date: 03/05/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
In
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat.
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
❑
Cl
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
Cl
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490032 Owner •f=acility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 03145/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
n
Checklists?
n
Design?
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall $ monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
Q
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
fi
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Inspection Date: 03/0512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NB
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n
n
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n
■ n
n
32. Did Reviewerhnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
n
■ D
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
■ n
n
Page: 6

•
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 490032
Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWC490032 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: lredell
Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 0812312.007
Entry Time:11 X00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Incident #:
Farm Name., Joli-Bell Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: William R Bell
phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 175 Nabors Rd
Statesvil3e
NC 286778577
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant
❑ Not Compliant integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35"44'32"
Longitude: 80°48'38"
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road. General
location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: William R Bell
Operator Certification Number: 21924
Secondary OIC(s):;'
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
On-site representative
William R. Bell
Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name
William R. Bell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Ile
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s
Inspection Summary:
06/25/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.7 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/16/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.3 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/25/06 > Soil Analysis
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 08/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
11 Cattle - Dairy Calf 75 45
W Cattle - Dairy Heifer 225 85
Cattle - Dry Cow 50 20
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 350 177
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW:
700
811,250
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 24.00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 0812312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑'
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Cl
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection,_Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity fess than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -Ma that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

1
s
Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 0812312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n
Total P205? 0
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? Q
Crop Type 1 Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Cl
■
❑
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490032 Owner • Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 08123/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? n
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
In
Annual soil analysis?
In
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑l
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
000
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
n
n
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

1p
Permit: AWC490032 Owner- Facility: William R Bell
Facility Number: 490032
i
Inspection Date: 0812312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■ fi
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
W ❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4 Facility Status: Active Permit:.AWC490032 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliancg Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/28/2005 Entry Time: 1030 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Farm Name: Jo -Bell Farm
• • +i►JIlIFi1:� ISI
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 175 Nabors Rd Statesville NC 286778577
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: i Latitude: 35°44'32" Longitude: 8Q°48'38"
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road. General
location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William R Bell
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 21924
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name William R. Bell Phone: [phone]
On-site representative William R. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be0e Phone: CZ'• Inspector Signature: Signature: Date:''`
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
10/16/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.3 Lbs19000 Gallons
03/27/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.5 Lbs11000 Gallon's
01/25/06 > Soil Analysis
le
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
c.
Inspection tate: 1212812006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine ,
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
© Cattle -Milk Cow 350 160
Total Design Capacity: 350
Total SSLW: 490,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
W5P
24.00
48.00
Page: 2

0
Permit: AVVC490032 Owner • Facility: William R Bell
Inspection Date: 12/28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated vo€ume reaching surface waters?
Facility Number : 490032
Reason for Visit: Routine
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential -adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
n■nn
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe U ■ Q ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n ■ n n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Appllcation
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydrau#ic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n■nn
0000
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
n
n
C1
Page: 3

0
Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell
Inspection Date: 12128/2006 Inspection Type: Ccmpliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490032
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
fl
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
rl
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Q
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
fl
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
fl
■
Q
❑
Plan(CAWM P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
0
Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0
■
0
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4
N

Permit: AVVC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number : 490032
f
Inspection Date: 12/28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑. ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
rl
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES cniy)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
D
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
D
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
00
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours an&or document and report those
n
■
n
Q
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
I
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490032 Owner - Facility: William R Bell Facility Number: 490032
Inspection Date: 12128!2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the €acility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6
C
N

o�0� W A r�RQt:
William (Rex) Bell
Jol i -Bel l Farm
175 Nabors Road
Statesville NC 28677
Dear William (Rex) Bell:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
November 24, 2004
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
NC DEPT. OF £i1�1�1rZQRi�+l-ZT
A,%D MTUFl AL RPSOUILES
DLC 1 ; 2004
MOORESVILLE ZEGIM'AL OFFICE
DVVQ-GI 0W%1�11',fATER SECTION
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490032
Joli-Bell Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
iredell County
In accordance with your application received on November 18, 2004, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William (Rex) Bell, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number
AWC490032 which expired October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Joli-Bell Farm, located in iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 350 milk cows, 50 dry cows, 225 heifers, and 75 calves, and the application to
land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pgy careful attention to the record kee in
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
WZrihCarolina
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service MUMMY
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal OpporlunitylAffirmalive Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or' more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at 715-6698.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490032
APS Central Files

Type of Visit' 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit KRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time: ;iib
Departure Time: County:
Region: lyko
Farm Name: SeU -#
Xokei
_- Owner Email:
❑ NE
Owner Name:
Phone:
❑ NE
Mailing Address: /f� S
AWW5 Rll
J;lo�ajle_ A.2c
J,No
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: k[.10 Pelma _ Title: 00m4m /,DZ t - Phone No:
Onsite Representative: -7 Integrator:
Certified Operator: Re x .9 r 11
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other T
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
=t
=At Longitude: =0=4
°04 = 4f
Design Current Design 'Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑
Layer
�. ❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑
Turkex Poults
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
® Dai Cow ,sv O
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket j
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
J,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: g ly— Z Date of Inspection I I/ ' 117 -Df
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: WF
❑ NA
Spillway?: Jae f
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Designed Freeboard (in): 14-4
® No
Observed Freeboard (in): Ll7
❑ NE
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ NA
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
g] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
®No
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
&9No [INA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
P9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
H. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 69" r2``i%-C DnA w l c-Arsr UAK
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
f-2?r0f 10".oy
y.gjlr •s.6 u•
1j Al 6-16.-
Reviewer/inspector
.f6,
Reviewer/Inspector Name.
4Phone:
',��� �z
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 11- /7, vs
12/28/04 Continued

.S
Facility Number: t -j 47 — ' ;L Date of Inspection 111-01--f
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 1] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WDP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design El Maps [:1 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ' Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA EINE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
��1 ��►�' 6e . ss iJI SiacK Pe.4s
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
09 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1, Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
[N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional.Comrnents'andlor:-Drawings
ir'i
I�p
�
A� a I
V
��1 ��►�' 6e . ss iJI SiacK Pe.4s
117

Mr. Rex Bell
175 Nabors Rd
Statesville NC, 28677
Dear Mr. Bell-
A&AA-
1uz
Michael V Easicy. Govcmor
William G. Ross Jr,. Secretary
North Carolina Dcpartmcnt of Environment and Natural Resourccs
Alan 1k. Klirnck. P, E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 23, 2004
Subject: Joli-Bell Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC 490032
Iredell County, NC
Mr. William Burke of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June 16,
2004. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be properly operated and maintained and
all records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be
self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Burke or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
No Carolina Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresvilie NC 28115
Nawra!!y
A*A
NCDENR
[phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

n
�T,y +t �.g-Jr' u4 aK a�YMF. a +7e(x��-�," -.n- . ..;..,,,,, rw�.r. r•, .r.,A'�.f� tFr'� *." a
tie Z'N
Division .. .i r! of Water. Qu • 1t"�'' ., ' ,�
,. J7'�: ho rye, StF 'y$•,(� h�i♦ r- L 4 n -�`+� t �a
Division of Soil and�Wa�ter�Conservation��, ,.,'� ►�„ � ,� �� �t� ,
Other Agenci t �r a i�l ti i
y . 4, h � y .. ' � � 1w � �,��� "` � ,� �"ti�a ��. `i;• w��' .m r �� �r`a• i' t,�tv s. � C"�t' �� i _
J'�;';.,^.,. '.. i'„�•._YiSL�[.ti�j..L.!`:....i.N.'i4.���° .+-,... `} ... _ r. �h,SJ�.t;- .,� � .M1 .�k.�"r� .�1, � ,� tf �.'.F�:.. �.. .r � r
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility' Number 49 32 l I mic of Visit: 6-t6-2404 Timc:
0 Not O mratiom0 01telow Thi-vshold
® Permitted ® Certified p Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Ahovv Thresthold: .............
Farts name: JQK-.ti11111M............................................................................................... Count}'. Jr.4:d01j................................................ MRQ...........
OwnerName: 1?l'.lllutea.LRul..................... B.C11 ............................................................... Phone No: 70.4.471-9.63.8 ...........................................................
MailingAddress: J.7.5..NaLbal;5.R9ad................................................................................ Stat.uxillv...N.C...................................................... 2-16.7.2 ..............
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:....................... ....... Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... lntegrator:............................................................. I........................
Certified Opera tor:W..ijI,lR1nj?............................ BCjj ..................................................... Operator Certification Nurnber.-2,192.4 .............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road.
General location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 44 32 Longitude 80 • F 48 - 38
Current: -- 5� ' :Design Cu_ rrent "w:��--•� ,.;R-: �. Design. CuTirentr.
�Swtne Cti` acit Po `elation Poultry �� :,Ca aci ' Po elation': Cattle Ca aci Po elation
tiN
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer
``
® Dairy 700 I75
>. ❑ Non -Layer
-
❑ Non -Dairy
Other
J
= Design Capacity 700
{ ,v, a.,r�Total
Y. 17 c .
�- Total SSL W : ` 980,000
...- =S .0 _. ".'�tt^:R +i. •'J+iv:.
i.. .Y'.. �. Fi.wY.s r- - 7.•it:r-.:. ...-_r-
Dischau-cs & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. li'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ )
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
N 'aste. Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: .1 L ................ ............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 51
12/12/03 Continued

Facility Number: 49-32
/late of Inspection 6-36-2004
5. 'Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, ctc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9, Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
'sant n em=Fieldp❑Fu l Notes 3
-Farm and Records appear well maintained.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/12/03 Continued

Facility Number: 49.-32 Date of In.hcction 6-16-2004
Reouired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ VaT, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
34. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required farms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112/03

Facility Number Date of Visit: '�i. —d Time:
y a.
=Not Operational C Below Threshold
® Permitted W Certifiedp © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or _Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ...3po_j�.. R..}�4r�1.......�,� n ............................................................ County:.. �4.lr.l..................................................
Owner Name:... ....................................................................................... Phone
-INo: ..............................................................................I..........
Mailing Address: J.�64. 1f
...AIAB-......... kd/............................................... ...... '�i ''. .................. R�..
............... ..., A.:I.7
FacilityContact: ............fz!!�* ..... ............................... Title:...... .``'Nc............ I ............ ....... Phone No: ............................ .......................
/� rr
OnsiteRepresentative: .................................................... . ...... .............................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator : ................................................... ...............................................:.......... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ' " Longitude • 4 «
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes kNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes J'No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min"?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes f No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Iden[ifier: ......... ... ..................... ............................................................................................................................................. .................. ..............
Freeboard (inches): !j '
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: --
Date of Inspection6-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes U No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ;9 No
❑ Yes gi No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
12. Crop type Gk
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Pq No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ;K No
❑ Yes '14 No
❑ Yes QJ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ® No
-l.` i. s.Y; :�!aS 4� F �k= t°':'" �iS+"?' >;s3{hE9i:Ef y�.� .li,iE! . t,c ' 1;,.t. ,:3';SA sZt.""pbd.,t�S..i#;$;§;&i'.i{+..i34.'i4' • "Y:t d�x`.y. ,-S#w6 if;".> � ". ?±(P} a ;;&4, Y . ��iB �.F«,l.6��"t;aitftif.i. e,�9t.,.IF,.t�*: ,:e 'N i S t���i� _ � €
CO(ref'er,to�question��#)�Ex' lata?anYES,3aaswers?and/ar an reconsmendatiaasoran{y�.okher��-cotaments",;;�_,�_�` e iii=" s!'q �� E'
iUse dir{awings;af,fsctlity�Eio'beE11tter explain s�tuapoos.{(use additonalEpages as necessary):�ield COPY ❑Final Notes ;n '��,
g�jjFhhf'.1j Eg e{EEi;9 $ { I4I4}3 i}tii i I{ j{ (i{{33[i €$ i!6? e#{e i f 6.' .
# 3 � i.. � 9 �S�F�'. . �� �y}�$°� .p7{; } : ik' j {i .§ ���[1t @°. BpgS'
u9.A37 d.1!�,:�ji�.6.�E�,<i.�l,..'tblHt�1�...:4:BtYfSlj,�lU#':�i3�ii�i91�ii3S3.
—Pftm A604 Qcan-& *PPS w4 rnV� fy► APed
'7!v9` - ..S -;� .SW: f'' .$I4 f€ }11 ,� g{"f'fY;�Y! {`t5^ F4 �'. mi 399,'titE•i& 93a }•� @;$E6YF€�t we`E E�b* t',�{4K9�t lE;i''t i I3, li�' m� j -j 51 �t
Reviewerllnspector Name
��.a.:3�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: pgmmk< Date: 6-1,6-0
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: y7 — Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 50 No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Pian readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
19 No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
27,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditit 61i'Coinments and/dr Drnwin .e � 0� `
gS �
..t. ?F.fau
A6
7
12112/03

of W A r�R
D Y
Mr. Rex Bell
175 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr -Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 29, 2003
Subject: Joli-Bell Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage #: AWC490032
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 28,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
VCK
ENR
Customer Service
1 877-623-6748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

40 Division of Water Quality.
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation-.
t'7x; ��� I �O Other Agency s1.= •, <. .
zs. _- 'a...,...i�`n .:mss .n��,k..�u _k .. ....
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other Cl Denied Access
:tcilitr Number
44 32 Date of Visit: 10/29/2003 'Time:
-- -- - -_---- .- — O -01 7) wrational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered 1)utc Last Operated or AboveThreshold: ..........................
Farm Nantc: J.Q104i.korm........................ ... County; Lr.cdcu................................................ MQ
.................................................................... ............
Owner Name: V1!illiatna.(RU)..................... Rell................................................................ Pltone No. 7.0,4:471:9.63.8 ...........................................................
,1:iiling .address: 1.7.5.ZYa,bar5.RA.aO............................................... ... S.t Ns.Yalg..NYC............................ . M.7.7...............
.............................. .........................
Facility Contact: .......................................... .....'Title ... Phone No: .......................
OnsiteRepresentative: REXIELL.................................................................................. Intek;ratar:......................................................................................
Certified Oper•ator:.W.ill.falai..t2.............................)etal...................................................... Operator Certification Nuniber:219.24 .............................
Location of Furnt:
rom the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at end of road.
,encrai location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Morse latitude F -3-2T. Longitude 80 • 4$ 38
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Pouulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design
Current
Design Current -
Poultry Capacity
Population - Cattle
Capacity Population .:
❑ Layer
® Dairy
700 145
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
700
Total SSLW
980,000
Number of Lagoons I0 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste N'lanagement System
Discharge— & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge ori-inated at. [:]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharue is obsen ed. was the conveyance man-made`? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (Ifyes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Strucrure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identitier : ................................... ..................
Freeboard (inches): 60
ACIA21AI
i'....s_.. 4

UJ/ UJ/ Vi
Facility Number: 49-32
Date of Inspection 10/29/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
«`ante Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
4 VIIJI/1"CIJ
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
+ •z+ S' �vas�-•-'�- ; - �yrrr crs ew c+-�aas,air *rr,v+Gysy umx,r�. O.
Corarnents' reterkto;quesuou zplaiganyrYES sns ers°audlor artyrecomt en ationsm any other omruepts,
�y�Y� .y2�'iis2e"4' ��:'"'*'af/ �dv3Yi.2JA'FfF'r. 4'�FL� i
Usedrarvings'uf facii'bett .$1 0 ug� ❑ Field Copy 0 Final Notes
ACILITY IS WELL MAINTAINED AND THE RECORDS APPEAR TO BE COMPLETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan dobson
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �' i�� ,�-- Date:
:J

SOF W A rF�Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
' iii TR &N�ecr�T
r' North Carolina Department of Environ 6r• �G
D �c mek„PE”
kgv
torsion of'WaterOui
March 28, 2003 App 17 2�Q�
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William (Rex) Bell
Joli-Bell Farm
175 Nabors Road ��� -
Statesville NC 28677
Subject: Application No. AWC490032
Additional Information Request
Joli-Bell Farm
Iredell County
Dear William Rex Bell:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 27, 2003:
This office currently has a waste utilization plan ,(WUP) for this facility that was dated 10/27/1999 and was later
amended on 61812000. The plan was written for 200 milk cows. Please verify that the same WUP is being followed on
this farm and, if so, please clarify the following items:
a. The WUP also shows 150 cows for 365 days and it is unclear whether the waste produced and nutrient calculations
are based on 200 dairy cows or 150 dairy cows. These calculations should match the certified animal numbers of
200 dairy cows for this facility.
b. A more detailed Emergency Action Plan is required for this farm. Please complete the enclosed form, keep a copy
for your records and send a copy to be included in the permit package.
If you have modified the WUP since, then please submit a copy of most recent WUP that reflects correct number of
animals, crops grown, field utilized and has field maps with acreage clearly marked on the maps.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before April 27, 2003 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in
accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Mana,ement Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi
Soil Scie tist
Non -Di harge Permitting Unit
cc: oresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File i* ►/�
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Intemet httpJ/h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu NCbENR
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone 1 Boo 623-7748
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATIQN
Facility Number - 3 Z Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: t�Cw3 acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative:k� �rT Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: i161504-) Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit:exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Z Annual farm PAN deficit: Ir. pounds
Z q06 uK ►frti �ln���
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear --move system; fi"M
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportabie pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part Il, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettabie acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ili. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART H. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination.
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 ' Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination. required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

i
Facility Number �' -
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
4
Part lll. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBER'' IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER-- must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres acrd having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
William (Rex) Bell
Joli-Bell Farm
175 Nabors Road
Statesville NC 28677
Dear William Rex Bell:
1 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 31, 2000 t^; Q1 .'. ".Z7 .i:1:a
5� 2000
t�:.�}l i`es E�':!: �!ilt�+R• si,l, }. �t.., ri.Jfa.l
Subject: Application No. AWC490032
Additional Information Request
Joli-Bell Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 30, 2000:
1
The acreage for various hydrants and pulls on Table 1 of your waste utilization plan does not match with the maps
provided with your irrigation system. Please verify and indicate the correct acreage on the map for the various pulls.
2. Irrigation parameters (application rate and application amount) are missing in your permit package.
3. Apply months for individual crops and months are missing in your waste utilization plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 30, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject.you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR Josh
Soil S entist
Non- ischarge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
•
and Natural Resources
0
Division of Water Quality
SEP 22 1999
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ki,11
ctj W 'xr
NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary
Fsw a: =rlk pc
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URGE5
September 15, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William (Rex) Bell
Joli- Bell Farm
270 Nabors Road
Statesville NC 28677
Farm Number: 49 - 32
Dear William (Rex) Bell:
You are hereby notified that J01' -Bell Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215. l OC, must apply for coverage under an
Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
t
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NC DEPT. OF ENVIR0h1Agt4T.
AND NATURAL RESOURCE�'chael F. Easley, Governor
W
A r�RQGMOORESVILLE REGV,0,!- "kMX , G, Ross Jr., Secretary
Nort'.. arolinRrEGm6nt of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
'I } Division of Water Quality
° 4 2003
h '
January 13, 2003
William (Rex) Bell WATER QUALITY E�F,10 y Number 49 - 32
Joli-Bell Farm
175 Nabors Road
Statesville NC 28677
Subject: Public Meetings for Draft Renewal of State Non -Discharge Animal Waste Operation General
Permits
Dear Producer:
Your animal waste management facility is scheduled to be issued coverage under the Animal Waste
Operation General Permits in the near future. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently
in the process of renewing the Animal Waste Operation General Permits and is scheduled to have the
permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for
coverage under the reissued permit.
The Division has published a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of
the draft animal waste operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext. 574
The Division will be conducting public meetings regarding these renewed permits. The following is a
list of dates, times, and locations of the public meetings:
February 3, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Kenansville — James Sprunt Community College
February 4, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Williamston — Martin Community College (Bldg. 2 Auditorium)
February 6, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Iredell -- Iredell County Center
Further information can be obtained by reviewing the Fact Sheet available at the website and address
listed above.
Cc: rMooresvttte-RegionalOfFice-Division-of-Water_Quality.1
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Application File 49 - 32
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal opportunity Action Employer
X*A
AElENR
Internet http.,//h2o.enr.nc.state.usindpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

l�
SOF W A TF9Q Michael F. Easley
Governor
�] r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Rex Bell
175 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 22, 2002
Subject: Joli-Bell Farm, Site Inspection
Facility #: 49-32
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on November 21,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
&4A f�
Cc D+ffrT,
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 26115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 4 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other Cl Denied Access
I I)ale of Visit: 11/21/1002 Time:
Facilitv Number 32
..... _ - Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: . __ __ __ __ __ _.
Farm Name: UJILBedl.F.arm............................................................... ........ Count)': IXedeJJ..................................... MQ ........
Owner Name: 1'E'i1118i0.G8 X1---------- Rgll------------------------------- Phone Na: 794-872:9k38---------------._------------
IN'Iaiiinr Address:.I3a�d..--•............................................................................ Sialoyille..NC........................... ............................ 286.7.7 ..............
FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title: ............................................... Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: ),I$,i,I,,integrator:
Certified Operator:j? jUjAw.j............................&JE..................................................... Operator Certification Number:ZL4Zk_......._....... ...........
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy. 70 and Nabors Rd. (SR 2157), travel south 1 mi to the end of Nabors Rd. Farm at enol of road. i
General location: 3.5 miles east of Statesville. 1
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 44 32 •i Longitude 80 • 48 38
.Design - -Current Design • Current'- ' '- ;: Design Current
Swine Canacity Pansslation Poultry Canacity Ponulatinn Cattle 4ranaritv Pnnulatin
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑Layer -; ® Dairy 200 160
❑ Non -Layer I ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
' TotslDesign,,Capaciity . 200
'y
rx.,,Total4SSLW 280,000
Discharties S Stream Ininacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsened, was the conveyance man-made?
El Yes ❑ No
b• if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. 11 -discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection S 'treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 0
Identifier•: ........................... ........................... --•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•---------..-._-•--•--....._............................. ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 24

VJ/VJ/Vt
Facility Number: 49-32 Date of Inspection 11/21/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
Lvneuwrtr
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps; etc.)
19., Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively cerdfied operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify. regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
:n`F�9f�4� �r "."�. .J.'i ..,.. erne'-`.��'-_Y�v.7�P.�S',§�.f��llej:.�.$5`.
k t)n�Rd/or'an
f: �. L: �i�{r�
comm�ti°
� SSI �.F.
Ler °nnmen
.°$. .V7, .'��'� ate+ •
M�002:01s
amwv
RAMImei
O°�
Z
. ❑Field Copy
❑Final Noteom
--W�w
FACILITY AND RECORDS IN GOOD SHAPE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ALAN JOHNSON
„N.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ' _
Date:/—��--G
t�i

O�O� W A r�RQG
William Bell
270 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject:
Dear Mr. Bell:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
[ {��-�'�� William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Joli-Bell Farm, Facility #: 49-32
Iredeil County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson,/
Environmental-4ecialist II
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

- �A-a
;. WAr G i
p�pF E9pG Michael F. Easley
` Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 `r Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 23, 2001
Rex Bell .
175 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC
Subject: Joli-Bell Farm, Site Inspection
Facility 49-32
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 16, 2001.
Based.on his observations made during the inspection, the facility appeared to be well maintained:
and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection reports, which should be self-
explanatory.
In reviewing your waste application records there was some confusion regarding the fields and
acreage receiving waste. For clarity it is requested that waste applied on the main irrigation field be
recorded separately from -the other fields.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: File
A'"►4 —
Nnr�
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely, �p
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit GQompliance Inspection Q Operation Review 01agoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit jWoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Dateorvisit: i-51//6/0/ ITime: �G
L_ Facility Number'EZOD_7� 7-
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
❑ Permitted Wertifed 0 Conditionally Certified , 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name:... .................... ...5. - -.L-...` .. .� 1.-----... Y (cka-..................... County J..L •e [. !/.......................
Owner Name: ..........................F�.2..................S...`.�..`.
.............. Phone No: ............................... I ................................... I..................
Facility Contact:...................................................... .....Title: Phone No
Mailing Address: .....1.7. 5 ....... [.l? s........./Z4. U lei
.> ............................. r.• .(........................
Onsite Representative: '�... B -C. ... Integrator ....................................
Certified Operator: . 4�' ... b�`� Operator Certification Number: ................
P ...............................
.Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry (ACattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' ��; Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE3 Layer Dairy - (" C
❑ Feeder to Finish I ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑'Gilts .
❑ Boars .-Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area . .
Holdin Ponds /
g Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &: Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes Q No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Walcr of the State? (If yeti, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. Hdischarge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ -Yes Flo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �Q No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: — _Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Q Spillway ❑ Yes tqD No
Structure I Structure 2 StrUCLUre 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................ _................... _............ ...................................
2 .
Freeboard(inches): 3 �..............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [240
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? . El Yes E[No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ELNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ff;No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes iD No
Waste Application
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Ef­No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
fffNo
12. Crop type (' v'y1 SvY1 1' , ✓i
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
BNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
&No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
d No
17. Are rock outc present?
❑ Yes
El No
18. Is there a Ovate su!'' pply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site . ❑ Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[�No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
&No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
IgNo
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
EUNo
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
,R -No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
g -No
25. Did Reviewer/fnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
,�JNo
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Q No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
cQ_No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
,ZNo
01/01/01
Continued

Facility Number: _ Date of Inspection �J
30. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Printed on: 1/4/20Q1
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes j,ZNo
❑ Yes] No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments'(refer to question'#): Explain any YFS answers and/or anyxecotnmendations or any,other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better situaf�ons use a
f dditional a
' ' �explainT , pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy E] Final Notes
r
J►
J St
�l.`�`� t'err,c>> c4 ; !�/> [�v �s t-� n��t �r'c.�w:�-c c; ✓� s `�i:.sr-- c_t C'r
l�_?4-e—
_
s
0 ffea,-el �c, k -c' f_ -k lyl e-, (rz e.S1 ,
r
'Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
01/01/01

I {
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL., RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 26, 2000
Rex Bell
175 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Joli-Bell Dairy, Facility #: 49-32 .
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on September 21, 2000. Based on his observations during the inspection the facility
appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the files were complete. Enclosed
please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
Mr. Johnson had a discussion with Mr. Rocky Durham of the Division of Soil
and Water regarding the completion of your IRR -II form concerning the nitrogen
applicatioti rate for your fields. It was decided that because the irrigation system is
applying waste at one rate and the spreader at another rate, the rates must be
recorded separately. However, both rates may be recorded on the same IRR -II form.
For example, on a 70 -acre field an irrigation system is applying 455,000 gallons of
waste to 40 acres (an application rate of 11,375. gal/ac). On the remainder of the
field (30 acres), a spreader is used. The amount of waste applied by the spreader is
246,000 gal, or 8,200 gal/ac. Although the waste is applied to one field, the two
areas receive different application rates (11,375 vs. 8,200 gal/ac). If the waste
analysis determined that 8 lb NI1000 gal. should be used, then the nitrogen
application rate would be 91 lb/ac on the 40 acres and 65 lb/ac on the 30 acres. If the
application capabilities (i.e. rate) for the spreader and the irrigation system were the
same, then the records would not necessarily have to be kept separate.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely, r
/✓ • p (-o
D: Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
-FOZ5r
Fu F,�rF:rr.�
2 U I 0
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILI.E, NORTH CAROLINA 26115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OppORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

,DO— ivision of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit wloutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
} Uatr or Vi-.4:�� /61 I imc: 1'rintrd +in: 7/2112000
Facilit`- Number
0 Not Operational 0 Belo« Threshold
❑ Permitted .V Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Cl Registered
FarmName: ............... 5�...1.!...........,r.(� ..........................................................................
Owner'14'<tme:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. I'itle:.........................
Mailinc Address: . ....I 4., .C' `r 5 l
.7
Onsite Representative: ......... K.."�..�.:v................:..4.................................................
Certified Operator:
Loratinrr of Farm:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County•!e�-�................ ........
Phone No: ......................
....................................... Phone No= ...................................................
t..{.....�'.................................. Q x ..7..7.
Integrator: ................................ .................---
Operator Certification Number:......... Ze1. .........
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 4 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� �'�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Canacity. Population Poultry capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder Laver Ell Dairy 26 U
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder [ED Other
ID Farrow to Finish -Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JIM Laceon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar,,es S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Diseharue originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li discharec is observed, was the conveyance: man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharue is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (tf yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
L% 1',' discharp. is observed- what is the estimated flaw in �Talhnin?
d. Does dis :hangs bypass a lagoon system'` (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any -part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters oSthe State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is stora.-e capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
IdendFier:.........................................................................................................:..........................................................................
Freehoard (inches):
,inn
COrltirltLBd OR IIfLCIi

Facility Number: Date of, 1n.pectlon Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion. Yes �No
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes lj No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ji�No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
12.No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
_ � No
Write Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
ANo
11, Is there evidence of over application'? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop typeas
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in t e Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
'❑ Yes
KN0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
5?�No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
X10
Reouired Revords & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
❑ Yes
K] No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP. checklists. design. maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
kNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
jg.No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
42.No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
El Yes
IRNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge. freeboard problems. over application) ❑ Yes 5LNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'? ❑ Yes ;a No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes ,® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes tbkNo
�'Vo yiol'aficjris;of defeiestci iv rg h6ted• ding #his'visit; • Y'oit will•teeeiye tib fuirthee ;
Cor're orideirce. a�ouf is :visit:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings[ of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages
ass necessary)):
C.
ReviewerAnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:C?^ Date: •— ,2/--� 5/00

Facility Number- Date of Inspection C� Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or helow ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals nog disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ;2,t4o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes CAlo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes Flo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ,, TNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
A.
5100

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
William (Rex) Bell
Joli-Bell Farm
270 Nabors Road
Statesville NC 28677
Dear William (Rex) Bell:
IT 1 • •
WL
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RES6IJRCES
. �� ti�Lr�• ui� �v
December 30, 1999 f€�1WtRo�rrrh;vR ui �
V NATURAL
000141E own UA
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-32
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR], IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD I, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local. County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere] ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

!g.NCDENRti
K.
JAMES S. HUNT JR:�.If"?�
-GOVERNOR
j ' WAYNE'MCDKVITT
SEGRE'I'ARY f'
41
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 25, 1999
William Bell
175 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Joli-Bell Farm, Facility #: 49-32
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May
18, 1999. In general the facility appeared to be in good shape. _
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The
following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, feed areas must be shown.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should be
made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general waste should
be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: file
Sincerely, �/�j
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
516 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 251 15
PHONE [phone]li9 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

161 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Permitted Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 Not Operational] Date Last Operated:
..........................
I_
FarmName : .............[�.1.►..... .. ..�.........r- Il!%\................................... County:.......... �. r (� . ..1..................... .......................
Owner Name: `
.............. ,��A..G�, L ......................�.0 .............................................. Phone No:......... .. ...Z...... ...���i1.3. .......................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
'7�5—
Mailing Address: r. S v + .............................. .. `�....
Onsite Representative:......f� }�........ t�. �,.� .. Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.......... .,eye .. � ..lj Operator Certification Number:
....................... .........................................................................................
Loj tion of Farm:
nude ���` Longitude
Design Current. Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acit Po elation ;Poultry Ca ap city Po elation Cattle Ca acit Po elation' m
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I Dairy 124YV I % 3:
�; ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Wean E'
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gittsr ;1 `
❑ Jotal SSLW
Boars z a h I iel " s
' Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Loon Area a ❑ Spray Field Area
jN`umber,of Lagoons . , ❑ t;
holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
i. 1 .0 ..: I ..
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gathnin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ}
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):�4 ........................................................................................... .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes 'j] No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back
Division of N t
a' U
'
Division of Soil Conservation
g '
and,Water :,Compliance
-Division of Water Quality Comphanee Inspection "
i 1
e..r� r �-�-.� s..ed,..i )., � Ic' E:i. 1...
Gratton Review,
... ... .•F o p -..-.,s .6.z ..i� .a .3 .3 $,,,3',a �€ ..'.1'i� !a_i....l. eta ,;? a,. Fri t ;e' A i
`Y
r'.{ 3. Y,.�4
161 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Permitted Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 Not Operational] Date Last Operated:
..........................
I_
FarmName : .............[�.1.►..... .. ..�.........r- Il!%\................................... County:.......... �. r (� . ..1..................... .......................
Owner Name: `
.............. ,��A..G�, L ......................�.0 .............................................. Phone No:......... .. ...Z...... ...���i1.3. .......................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
'7�5—
Mailing Address: r. S v + .............................. .. `�....
Onsite Representative:......f� }�........ t�. �,.� .. Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.......... .,eye .. � ..lj Operator Certification Number:
....................... .........................................................................................
Loj tion of Farm:
nude ���` Longitude
Design Current. Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acit Po elation ;Poultry Ca ap city Po elation Cattle Ca acit Po elation' m
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I Dairy 124YV I % 3:
�; ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Wean E'
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gittsr ;1 `
❑ Jotal SSLW
Boars z a h I iel " s
' Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Loon Area a ❑ Spray Field Area
jN`umber,of Lagoons . , ❑ t;
holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
i. 1 .0 ..: I ..
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gathnin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ}
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):�4 ........................................................................................... .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes 'j] No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

r
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
14. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes �Q No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
A No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Yes
M No
❑ Yes
P9 No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
....o yiol'a>ki tgs'ot• dgeciencies wire pQte�1 d�tririg thls'vis t..;.....>}r will Tec�iye o, fuirth - :.. •
;corresporicience:this visit::: '
El Yes '4 No
❑ Yes 94No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
[:]Yes ,allo
[]Yes %No
kYes ❑ No
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0,No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes (Q No
❑ Yes Eg No
❑ Yes 0] No
_ .I - � I •:: i- Y f tk'd1�NlNf.'1fiNgl'dif :FItY.£1_., 11 1 i
`Comments,�(refer;,to,qutetshont ttExplain,anyYESsanaw.iers}}?.'�andlor-any, recommendations or anyiother cortEments�F��
:"4}3:�j}rdd>; f..• fr.gi-,. &��SP,S31[aYi6# !l,E,...�31 #-i i".I �M i°71i�4Ei;i:ETi99E:�xb o;�irFi.letn:l' Y 1 { - �s .<. 3iE , �;'.. ¢..1 E /_ 9i ;:#(�{�i� - f .s@d,L_:.�3: ):i. E i
f • 3�°v ! t5 r. ..< t 1 ,§ €'i?:. €
Use, drawings of facrl�ty to better,explam srtuarti�ons (tine addtbonal�pages as necessary) : �1 U . E`
Df eolzk /S C f'►+ ! 4 46TR— ctGf�•S w 0.S u rt �' Z Or'�
`
�f l
i7a1�{s/ �' `t Y1�o .`QCCQss i�[� �&.je_ 0. Cm -y a'p i&e_
I I
wok 5?;,oP/es e- o -r ­i -P eo sao�-t e13 #Iter ALi'\ or
`Reviewer/Inspector Name „a' ! '1✓rs s : ` ' ,'��� . .I °T' �_M I , .. ` �� '¢ "W, r�r� ^ 1
Reviewer/inspector Signature: ��[/�� �.�ac�.�-- Date: -5-- / $ —
3/23199

*1V
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE: REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
William Bell
270 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Site Inspection
Joli-Bell Farm, Facility #: 49-32
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the Ievel set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIvE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen N Application for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (112) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (112) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

State of North Carolina
-.� Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary '
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFMD MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Virgie Redmond
MacGibbon Dairy
139 West Glow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Virgie Redmond:
ILF!?FA
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November S, 1998
rac nlwrr. aP
NOV 12 1998
VIV1011 er E'; —1,"'i ltr1M�n101" Ellr
til:..s=`UZE RLI: 11&A MRA
Subject: Special Agreeme�
Facility Number.
MacGibbon Dairy
Iredell County
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr.'Shannon Langley, -of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
�.J
/
A. Preston Howard, J .,
ATTACHMENTS
cc:or-yillesRegionakOffceiw/attachments
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District w/attachment
Facility File w/attachment
Central Files w/attachment
Shannon Langley w/original attachment
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO3MMISSiON
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBE149-38
Vi RWGIi, RM -10N17 ) f��
ED
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-21�'�(>t�his 9 1996
Special Agreement is entered into.by Virgie Redmonohereinafter referrer cif
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management CommisSIMF 41? j0N
of the State of North Carolina created by G,S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as60ee Fief
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) . "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. iCapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement therewill be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or -liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified � -
animal waste management plan by December 31' 1998.

C-arm Number:. 49-38
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-21.5.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(I)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (I4) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
_ — identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragzaph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified S 100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identif ed in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the,
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d_ An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days bf receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will'be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E). M
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-38
Special Agreement
- E pate 3 -
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners subrilittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
Fox MacGibbon Dair�Facility # 49-38)
V )P G I E �E31rna01)
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
L.O".(
Date
Chairman of the Commission

AiA
NCDENk
JAMES 8. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE McDEVITT
'SECRETARY -t
i f
x: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 20, 1998
William Bell
270 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Joli-Bell Farm, Facility #: 49-32
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
October 15, 1998. In general the facility was observed to be in good shape.
A review of your files indicated that your waste application records were
incomplete. Also, your latest waste analysis was not available. It is important that this
information be up-to-date and available during your compliance review.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely, r
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PRONE 704-668.1699 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

£ �`� 'k ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Ageney
Division of Water Quality
� g A t
�`p s-r,.Rrx trn�s�, ;�,� �;.;,¢r,.v.,;,-a^� • zxx�ea�a«;2;Fo,w:�.��r^. .,.: ,....;,r ,�.�_ r v f x -: .c.''...,:;
loutine 0 Contplaint 0 Follow-ut) of MVO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Z
[� Registered 0 Certified Q Applied for Permit © Permitted
�.4.........-....... �:...�...........r
Farm :�!arne: '� � �. � �..:c". �-t!�.1.....................
OwnerName . ............. ..1��&..?..............h.c .(A..................................................
Date of Inspection �J
Time of Inspection _` � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Not O erational Date Last Operated:
County: .......... ..�..................... .......................
Phone No:..........?..'7Z—C?& 3 i
.......................................................................
Facility Contact: ........................ . Title: .......... Phone No:
Mailing Address:....... .. ,......1...�t.......�y.S... ............t?le � ��....,�.... .�3.a.�..................................... f .7....
.....
Onsite Represetatativc:.......e-k............: .�. Integrator: ........
.. ..
Certified O orator•......, C;,�
p f�.......k,............. Operator Certification Nttniber,........
G
Location of Farm:
-': Y;.1 t'r� .eG —� L;, a �:' 40AI "7J......9....................IL'��.. rC u e
.. -17K........ :5.i ...... 4._<....7... _.......... r-.. t.f...r......... r.... r.�� .....:..�:...:... j f, -1 ...............r................................
Latitude• .may : Longitude 'v •
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
, L No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9No
2, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharge originated at, ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation`' ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding" ponds) require ❑ Yes J;�No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback; criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes KNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes lPkNo
7/25/97

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.HcldinePonds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ..................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes 4 No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an -immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste kpplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
........................................................................
❑ Yes '�TNo
❑ Yes `,® No
15. Crop type ..............'
r
G%1. /fC. R ..............................---- ..
----..........................................................
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is them a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted_ Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0• No.vioEations.or deiicieneies.were,noted-dariiig this:visit.- Y.ou:will recei've-'•further :.
eorresporidence Ei oiit this. visit.:
f�G.sK Ct� lrLC'-Z at -1Cf-cd 1� !�Z L�`�t4"
❑ Yes
No
3Q Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
J� No
❑ Yes
t -No
❑ Yes PLNo
❑ Yes P_No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes P.No
$! Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes
Reviewer/Inspector Name.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
7/25/97
v��
e- ?L4 rrt�3/ 1moi lv4r,�e�
i
Lf! L
GSL P_.,; :JJL: 'S
�C: L-t.4'�
�
S L 5 L:,-Ct i
It C: 1 Q
cJ C: , • � Q 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
7/25/97
v��

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley 1�-3
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
KAA
4 Alfflo• A
AI10 ;k
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF .
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Ai.G DVAPT. Or
ENltMONMENT. K%Airy
m HAT.URAL itM)VIte-ft
MAR 5 1998
a�aes�� ,3� �saa�lErt�l wal,rr
�F tt �pcf
Please pied attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number 9f-3-2-.
t
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
J - -
A p_
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFOR\1AT10N REQUIRE FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
',l r
I. Applicant (Owner of the Facility):
2. Facility No.:9-
3. Facility Name:12
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance),
,AJi'lliAm /CP/,4 i9e,11 l n wper�
5. Mailing Address: OL; /y- , NQpoi`S -_ K.00-rF-
City: SiASti�le_ _State:N� Zip: 867
Telephone No.:
6. County where facility is located: Opal
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): C lMe_
8. Application Date: a— %1F' ff
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal, waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 1 of 4

f
:4
2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
IV, UU
FORM SPAG 1198
Page 2 of 4

e4
II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
D)e wlll ir35d/ Q i Lr&rf me PS ]Mair a-�Uk tva%-V-i
U
FA
l
A)
L-ioe1,1pY �e-
h � �� r- � L.re. Nc�s a's pck/--t OZ, AMP Aaoe- al�"
-
Applicant's Certification:
I, �lJ r �� , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand,if all re uired parts of this application are not completed and if all
this document removes my responsibility and fiaDillty Tor com 1 ma with al Orth Carolin
General Statutes and Regulations. I understand that the failure to meet any dates that are agreed
upon by myself and the EMC will resulQn_appropriate _enfor_cement actions beiDg taken by the
EMC.
Print Name of Owner
_. Date
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 3 of 4

9 , . 1
Reguired Items:
Qne 1 ori inal and two 2 coies of the com-pletedgnd-approprialely executed
ap.plication oris along with an -v attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORAIATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 4 of 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
. A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Marshall Lee Brock
Brock Tractor & Equipment Co.
PO Box 100
Bailey, N.C. 27807
Dear Mr, Brock:
4 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N.C. iJ?"€; r
N << � � .oaf ii`.r';t. `�•A . S�:y �� i�.yi�.
September 15, 1998
SEP IS 1998
Y r'��Z•i ��u t.E (<Llt1J1�1{t Ut�14C
Subject: Incomplete Certification
Facility Number 49-32
Iredell County
The Division of Water Quality has received the Animal Waste Management Plan
Certification Form for facility number 49-32, the Joli-Bell Farm. Upon reviewing this
certification I have noticed that sections II. D. and III. D. is missing your signature. Please fill
out these sections and resubmit the original certification form to our office as soon as possible.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], extension 571.
Sincerely,
.ADYic,ia X_ ANM4--
Sonya LUU. Avant
Environmental Engineer
Attachments
Cc: Mooresville Regional Office -- Division of Water Quality
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
F.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William (Rex) Bell
270 Nabors Rd
Statesville NC, 28677
Dear William (Rex) Bell:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1998,y�r
AFP b 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Joli-Bell Farm
Facility Number- 49-32
Iredell County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on February 23, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with William (Rex) Bell
in order to allow additional time for William (Rex) Bell to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the '
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

i
Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at (919).733-5083 ext. 539.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
MRO Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files
I

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-32
}
WILLIAM (REX) BELL
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by William (Rex) Bell, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission herebystipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with I5A NCAC 211.0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by -Consent., neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concrning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
f
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan•by October 1, 1998. .

Farm Number: 49-32
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement -
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected. , -
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties; or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-32
Special Agreement
Page 3
.7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Joli-Bell Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

7.' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAUL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William (Rex) Bell
Joli-Bell Farm
270 Nabors Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear William (Rex) Bell:
A I �A
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANI] NATURAL REsouRGEs
February 11, 1998
N.C. Dgp r. 01,
2N•V1R0N,,4E'N`r, E1EAI,Th
aP NATUfi,�I, RE_SUU1tCXS
FEB 25 1998
IMSION OF EHVIROHNtRTQt 11.4. 5,Jflli
1EQ9dE&.IltE ROWMA1 MICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Joli-Bell Farm
Facility Number: 49-32
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 5 8 L
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
.�
M :0,
4,aDWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10-woutine 0 Cont laint 0 Follow-up of D%VQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
:Facility Number Date of Inspection
__j Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered © Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: `So.\.i..:-...g:ek( County: .........................................
�...................................................................................... ........
0 -wrier....... .i ..'.........,..) �.��� ....,.. Phone % Zla.................................................
FacilityContact ............................ Title:...........................,.................................... Phone No:...................................................
�} r _ l( -yam
Mailing Address: ....
-`....%.. ......... � .—' k7A.cs........R1........................................ ...5 ......y...�.fh............... .......................... ,,�,.9..�t-7 ......
Onsite Representatives .................... ......................... Integrator .......................................................................................
Certified Operator: --w ............. ...... -b.ekk....... ............................. ... Operator Certification Nurnher..........................................
Location of Farm:
�............1° ,r` ..,. ..... ... ..�!!.. r..... ��. .��. ,..L r.., ... .�........r

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?. ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons,11olding, Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes X�o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only PIA
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes EZNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit`? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No.violations or deficiencies were -noted during' this'visit..You:will receive nti ftirther,
' eorresponde&e Abbitt this'visit:
Comments (refer to question #) Explaiwiny YES answers'and/or any„recommendations or any other comments., V
Use drawings 3af facthty to better explain sttuttttons. (use additional pag2.
es ati necessaey) k
Reviewer/Inspector Name : n,Q.k
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
R A
7/25/97
Date:I''7
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ............. ...................... .................. .................. ........... I....................... ...................................
...,.,...,.........................
Freeboard (ft): .......�... .....................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
14 No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
R.No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
1KNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
.ljio
Waste ;application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
PNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff a/nteri waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ........C/i../.�GGPex...r............................
15.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Pian (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
% No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'
❑ Yes
gNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
1?�No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
1ANo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only PIA
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes EZNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit`? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No.violations or deficiencies were -noted during' this'visit..You:will receive nti ftirther,
' eorresponde&e Abbitt this'visit:
Comments (refer to question #) Explaiwiny YES answers'and/or any„recommendations or any other comments., V
Use drawings 3af facthty to better explain sttuttttons. (use additional pag2.
es ati necessaey) k
Reviewer/Inspector Name : n,Q.k
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
R A
7/25/97
Date:I''7

State of North Carolina PT
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • .
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Q E H N R
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
William Bell
Rt. 15 Box 503
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Joli-Bell Farm, Facility #: 49-32
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should.be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street,N%ICAn
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 __ __ 500% recycled/10916 post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. jex' oWr Quality egional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
William Bell
Joii4kll Fane
270 Nabors Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Mr. Bell:
December 5, 1996
[D1HHNFZ
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVJR0Ni4 %NT. HEATA' ,
& dNA,rURAL Ri;SOU RCES
D>wC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Joli-Bell Farm DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Facility ID #: 49-32 MONESULLE AEOITIAL OFFICE
Iredell County
Sena* Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
AgrWtural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, I996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A tracing and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC), The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a pennarient certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. ,The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Opetator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Woresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission NVfc An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P,O,
Box 29635 Rolelgh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _
Facility No. q-3?-
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: D- Z 1995
Time:'4gwM
Farm NamelOwner:
Mailing Address: yr
County: jadeJ1 Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: eltj � , �el / Phone: A -96 3Y
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation:Swine_Poultry,
ign Capacity:LNumber of Animals on Site:L
Latitude:�o ° y$' 39' Longitude: 3�' W .3 2- Elevation: X2-0 Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot +'7 inches) Oor No Actual Freeboard:,-Ft.,_�Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or i& Was any erosion observed? Yes or6
Is adequate land available for spray? es or No Is the cover crop adequate? es or No
Crop(s) being utilized: C-4 0
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 6) or No
100 Feet from Wells? Cy;) or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or Q
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oks�
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oo If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: , A4 Q ay i n
Inspector Narnd"�rJri� �ea �Wen� Signature P Prz�
cc:'Facility Assessment Unit

�0F'"ar_9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
T_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p
chlem". tF EW e Mk i -� AI n W. Klimek, P.E., Director
= NATWAL RESM15iv9sion of Water Quality
NOMESVILI E MIO?'f�' L 4D'
May 30, 2003;
r�
William Rex Bell 'JUN 0 4 2003
Joii-Bel I Farm
175 Nabors Road
Statesville NC 28677
Subject: Certificate oCoverageNo�'`AWC490032
Joli-Bell Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Iredell County
Dear William Rex Bell:
In accordance with your application received on November 4, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to William (Rex) Bell, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval
shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from
the Joli-Bell Farm Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater than annual average of
350 Mills Cows, 50 Dry Cows, 225 Heifers, and 75 Calves and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Pian (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Pernut; the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the
required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future
samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will
need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the -obligation to comply with all applicable laws,
rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this
permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation
to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any
wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the
CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through
143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General
Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
DENR Customer Service Center
An Equaf Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled1100% post -consumer paper

I
pp/ppp----
ti a7
i This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the
Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for
an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a
request is made within 30 days', this COC shall be final'and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact,J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
[Mooresville -Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490032
NDPU Files

ci
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please tvae or print all information that docs nut require a sianatwe
iExistinp- or New or (Expanded )(please circle one) I
General Information:
NamcofFarm: Joli-Bell Farm Facility No: 49 32
Owner(s) Name: Wi1Li_am Rex Bell _ _ Phone No:. -704-872-2130
Mailing Address: 175 NahQI:S Road, Statesville-,_ _NC__ 28677
Farm Location:
County Farm is located in. Iredell _
Latitude and Longitude: 35 44 -20 / 80 48 40 Integrator: None
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): From Statesville, NC, travel East on US 70'. 2'miles'_. to
Naborg„Road(SR2357), turn „Right and go to the end, the farm is located on the
Operation Description:
Tvpe of Swine 1Vo. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
ZI Feeder to Finish
7 Farrow to Wean
Q Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
O Gilts
:1 Boars
TypeofPoulay No. ofrinimals
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
Other Tvpe of Livestock:
Type of Cattle No'' of Animals
M Dairy 700
ID Beef
350 Milk Cows
50 Dry Cows
.225 Heifers
75 Calves
iFrpandeng pperanon Only * 200 Certified _
Previous Design Capacrty: 34fl*: - - .rlddrtional Design C city 360 - :: 7'otvl lVii,Ert-Capacity 700_
Acreage Available for Application: 312 Required Acreage: 103
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : 1 Total Capacity:159.396 Cubic Feet (ft3l
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: e
or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRXY FLELD please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
1 (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. 1 (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner: William Re Bell
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):_,
Signature:
AWC - August 1, 1997
Date:
Date:

w
a
T
Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.O217 and 15A NCAC 6F.0001-.0005, The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collecti n Storage. Treatment System
Check :he appropriate box
11 1 ilZu fadbV without retrofit (SD or W JP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity, storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
U New, extsandgd or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): James F. Summers
Affiliation Iredell SWCD Date Work
Address (Aaeacv): 444 $risco r '_ St:atesville.= 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
B) Land AMication Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (bu$brs); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C • Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC—Ijaar , DSwC Date Work Completed: 11
Address (Agent.►): 444 Bristol. Dr. Statesville HC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-676
I Y
C) Runoff Controlafrom Erterio[ hots
Cluck the appropriate bar
O Facility w-ithout_exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
21 FaciliXy
Ath exterior 1 (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): J
Affiliation- IredelZ SWCD Date Work Completed: az--
C:lI /7Ea ',4 7T.) IC ).4t?PV. T �"1yN 1 /fT'1MC 77q(7gW T PIP - MT 17117117A7-77— A HI.t

t
D). Application and Handling EgWipment
Check the appropriate box
Si Existing or expanding facility with existing appliMfign gguiRment (WUP or [)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design chats and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
Q Npw. gmmmda gK exilting facility without existing waste a lication mcnt for 1praX irri tion, (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not t0 exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule fur timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance arc
contained as part of the plan).
0 New, expanded. or existin¢ facility without existing waste application Miament for land spreading not using
sy.my irriaarion. (WUP or[)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates ,not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): James F. Summers
Affiliation Zredell SWCD _ _ _Date Work Completed:
Address
Sigaatur
E)
Sidor Control, Insect Control. Mortality Management and Emerlrencv Action Plan (SD.
SI. WUP�R-or n
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist an Insect
Control Checidlst, a MoTWity Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Hest Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
J
Affiliation NC—DENR DSWC Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): D Phone No.: - -6761
Signature:_ _ —6 �,d��p� --.Date: / of
F) Written Notice of New or Eapandi* Swbtelprm
The following signature block is only to be usfid for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. 11 the facility waa built before June 21, 1996, when was it consnrtreted or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirrancuts of NCGS 10&805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC, -- August 1, 1997 3
CR/C *,4 ?T.1,Tr)-Rt7M).T 1Z1NW/n)mc 17=1rtauT TR!RT CMMP-77—KHU

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, -Storage, Treatment Installation
Ne -o=ofitted fhdLity (SI)
Animal wastt storage and treatrnent structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards -and specifications.
For existing futilities without re&oftts, no cerdfieation is necessmy.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): James F . Summers
Affiliation Iredell SWCD Date Work Completed:
Address (Aacncv): 444 )Iris ral Dr-, S
B) Land ApAcation Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
i']ater /I crz-
® The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month day/year); the proposed Cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wastetttilization plan.
Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping 6ystem as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish as interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lia Barrier, Jr
Affiliation NC—DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 1!
This following signature block is only to
above has been checked.
when the box for conditional approval in 11L B
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days fallowing the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM, .
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: ... Date:
AWC -- August 1. 1997 q
CR/t7P' 4 7T).T.C'J.s KA)T C'1�J1.1reT-)MC 77=(T7)!T TM -MT 1ti-11,1

C) Runoff Controls frgm Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with a tertx 'or lots - -
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without oderfor lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): James F. 5uuuuer.s
Affiliation I edel EW -CD Date Work Completed: 11, D
Address (Agency): 444 B ista Dr. St tesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-676
Risrnatsurp- LtAi a eq - Date. // & 4tr-
D) A icatil(n and Handling E ni ment In Ilation (WUP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
10 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan,
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing ar third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have beets provided to the owners and arc contained as part of the plan_
O Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (manth/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with
the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Speclalist (Please Print): James F. Summers
Affiliation Lr?.d?; J , SWCD _Date Work Completed:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in lu D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste managtmmt plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to stmt this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement aatitm from DEM.
Name of Lana Owner: NA
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control anti Mortality Manageement_fSD,,51, WUP. RC or I1
Methods to control. odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mQrtsEty
management system as specified in the Pian has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Li
Affiliation .NC--DENR DSWC ,, __Date Work
AWC — August 1, 1997
/SPS ./+'] 1 r i T_ 1 - I r __• 11 1 ,, " . _T /ten-" =. _ I U,

Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
201 Water Street, Room 103, Statesville, NC 28677
Telephone: [phone]
R
June 8, 2000 Q11 E/V�
To: JR Joshi S 1966Qyy
From: Jim Summers
Subject: WUP revisions for application # AWC490032.
Please find revisions for the above farm. I went over changes with Mr. Bell today. I will
send the revisions for farm #AWC490040 as soon as the agreement is signed. The other
farms that you sent letters to me on were handed to the respective technical representative
within the office.
Call if you have questions.

Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS LEASED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresi Required to be
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied2
360 1 1 CmC2 I PCS 13.3ton
acl
12.3ac !-1113
1,365
360 4 I CmC2 I PCS 13.3ton
acI
28.5ac I
111.3?I
3,163
353 1 1 Cm132 IA1f.Hayl
3.3ton/acl
18.5ac 1
149 1
2,756
TOTALS THIS
TABLE
59.3
7,284
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer areas which
border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
03'
When applying waste to grazed pasture, 'N' rates must be reduced by 25% this is reflected in this
column.

f
Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be
The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer areas which
border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most Iikely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.

Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen to be applied using
animal waste for all fields which are available for waste application.
SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
ACRES
USEABLE
TABLE 1 1 103.4
TABLE 2. 1196.1
TOTALS 1299.5
Amount of N Produced
Deficit
TOTAL CROP
NITROGEN
REQUIREMENT
IN POUNDS
45,076
10,985
34,091
RECOMMENDED
LBS. N TO
BE APPLIED
USING WASTE
10.985
10,98
000
SUPPLEMENTAL
OR RESIDUAL
LBS. OF N
REQUIRED
19
This summary indicates that only about 24 percent of the total annual nitrogen requirements can
be provided for the crops as listed for the fields available using animal waste produced on this
livestock operation.

WINDOWS FOR WASTE APPLICATION:
Cool season grasses------------------- 2/15-5/1 and 8/15-12/15
Warm season grasses----------------- 3/15-9115
Corn------------------------------------- 3/1-711
Soybeans ----_ 3/15-811
Sorghum -------- --- -- 3/15-8/1
Small grain----- -------, 8115-5/1

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Al - ZL County:
Address:
Date:
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications 1
Approximate
Maximum
`Useable Size
Field of Field'
Number2 lacres)
Slope
Soil Type N
Cropisl
I
Maximum
Application
Rate
(Inlhr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrlgetion
Cycl94
(Inchosl comments
I
I
I
!
l
.ZZ
GZ ?a
I
I p
I I
GZ I
I ik dm
1
!. 60 1
1 r
!SgL#ge
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I 1
I
I !
I
I
!
I
�I
l
I
I
I I
'Table to be completed in its entirety by soi.I and water conservation district (SWCD) personnel and forwarded to the Irrigation system designer.
See attached map provided by the SWCD for field location(s).
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G.
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
September 1995 page -1 North Carolina

Brock Equipment Co.( -
Po Boz 100
BAILEY, N.C. 27807
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
This irrigation system was designed by Shane Ward of Brock Equipment Co.
A scaled drawing, required calculations, and required specifications on pipe and equipment
are included.
The following buffers were maintained on this farm:
25 feet from ditch
75 feet from surface water and perennial streams
25 feet from property lines
200 feet from residence
100 feet from well
All comments and recommendations are appreciated.
Thank you,
Shane Ward

Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Travel speed = 4 fpm
Application rate - .3 7 fpm
Larne spacing m 340'
Wetted diameter = 425'
Gun make and size = Nelson 200
Nozzle size - 1.2"
Operating Presmm at gun = 90 Psi
Operating pressure at reel — 115 psi
Operafn pin at 1unP =129 psi
Arc patters = 330°
_ Flow rate of sprinkler - 405 Vin
Pump Power requ (blip) = 57
Total acm covered (dkctive) = 51.07
Traveler make and model = Cadman 4500 ,
Hose length =1175'
Hose disumcr (ID) s 4.5
Speed compensation = kcal
bjvdrant mm+er
Fffectiye Lengtb
E&ctbm W-Idth
Aam Covered
l
745
340
5.81
2
805
340
6.28
3
915
340
7.14
4
1,015
340
7.92.
5
740
340
5.78
6
1,190
340
9.29
7
1,215
340
9.48
Total:
. 5l. 07

State of North Carolinap
Department of Environment and Natural ResourcesR E C E I V E D
Division of Water Quality WATER QUAIJ YSECTION
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form ON 0 4 19-.1,9
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operq„rge Pelmitling
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: ]oli-Bell Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner'sApp: William (Rex) Bell_ _
1.3 Mailing address:
City, State: Statesville NC Zip: 28677
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-872-9638
1.4 County where facility is located: Iredell
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR nismbers for state roads. Please include a copy,
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): HWv, 70, 3.5 miles east of Statesville right on Nabors Rd.
SR 2157 %to 1 mile to end of the road. Farm on right.
1.6 Print Farre Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/89
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 49 (county number); _32 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy
200- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? =yes; =no. . If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
T+pe of Swine No. of Animals
• Wean to Feeder
• Feeder to Finish
• Farrow to Wean (# sow)
• Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
• Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals
• Layer
• Non -Layer
• Turkey
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 49-32
Twe of Cattle No. of Animals
• Dairy
• Beef
No. of Animals:

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
7?7.76 101'n
system):866F) Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 3$-99- /ZV.
2.4 Number of lagoons/(storage pond (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or9(please
please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility.
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
-3:3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3. 10 A site, schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
33.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 49-32
Applicants Initials

Facility Number: 49 - 32
Facility Name: 7oli-Bell Farm
4. APP ICANT'S CERT ICATION:
1, (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of rhy knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned t me as incomplete. (�
Signature2:_Z�Date zo _'7?7 -
S. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
. RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NOY 0 4,m'9
hon -Discharge permitting
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 49-32

wl"�.
ANN
IN MI
Ile
it
.07 YQ
sy
Ole
-kw
Nrv. 'fill
f, -j rr,1-2
3
'.
, - I , 1, � I
-Vk !i!
"d Ina
in 0 1
N � � � I X, N I - I YV
-Tvj 457,,W�N,
V17i;A - --p
imp
-41 -
WWI
1, �4.
17„t p
1hi,•N
WN
AN0.10
'IP zo I �r
N
21.
C "I f ICY gwrpcj
ISS�D kv /two
p re'u, A I S-rf
A
"T" ' '
KV,

. 020 CERTIFI'CATI@N PLAN
FARM SKETCH . .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III
SYSTEM OVERVIEW . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV
r
1. WASTE STORAGE POND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3. VEGETATED BUFFERS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. GENERAL COMMENTS . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 4
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (end)

. 0 2 00 CERTI F I CAT ISN PLAN
gYSTEM OVERyxEf++r
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following
components:
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
3. SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and stored in the WASTE
STORAGE POND (WSP). All contaminated water (wash,parlo.r and runoff)
will be piped into WSP. All waste contained in WSP will be land
applied at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to
provide 312 days storage for the solid wastes produced by 180 head
milking herd.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge
of Animal Waste Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five
(25) year, twenty-four (24)' hour storm, as required under the Non -
discharge regulations.

. 02 6i CERTIFYCATI&4 PLAN
1. WASTE STORAGE -POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff; animal
waste and waste water from the milk barn for a 312 day period. A permanent marker
will need to be set indicating the level of storage available prior to infrin Ing on the 25
year, 24 hour storm -capacity. The WASTE STORAGE POND consists of an earthen
dam, clay liner, and curbing for discharging contaminated water into the WSP.
OPERATION
The service life of the WSP will be determined by the level of management for the
entire system. Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WSP.
The accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity to a point which
requires removal of the solids for many years IF adequate waste agltation is
maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid: accumulation of
solids which will reduce the usable capacity of the WSP to the point that some form
of dredging will be required.
MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to
maintain a vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent
woody growth. Mowing operations must take place only when the soil of the dam is
dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less than four(4) inches at
any time. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage should be reported to the Iredell Soil
& Water Conservation District office.
2. AGITATION AND AffLICATIONE
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of a Waste Storage Pond with
-312 days storage. An agitator, pump and reel are on the farm. The operator will be
responsible for figuring rates and making sure the waste is applied at agronomic
rates.
See WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN for additional details.

. 0 2 4D CERT I F XCAT ION PLAN
OPERATION
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full
storage level marker in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP reaches the
marker, liquids must be removed by pumping from the structure, either into the
irrigation system or to a spreader tank for land application. Do not irrigate in such a
manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate on frozen or saturated soils.
Irrigate only until soil is near saturation point.
The -initial step',inreach irrigation operation is to properly agitate -the waste in the
Storage Pond. If application equipment (irrigation or spreader) is owned consult
owners manuals for recommended operational procedures.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receive waste application should have soil tested annually. It is advised
that recommended that waste and soil sample results be used, in conjunction with
each other
a. VEGETATED BUFFERS
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two fold purpose, they filter sediment from
exposed feeding and lounging areas. Their width is based on slope of land and
proximity to streams. These areas can be control grazed or mowed for hay to prevent
unwanted growth. These buffers are used in lieu of•storage-structures. Proper
maintenance of these buffers must be followed or a storage structure will be required.
A buffer of at least 25 feet must be maintained along all streams. If this buffer
cannot be maintained without a fence one will have to be constructed. It is very
important that a quality buffer be maintained.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within the
buffer. grazing does take place caution should be practiced to prevent overgrazing.
Grass should be a minimum of six (6) inches. These buffers should have at least
80% ground cover. Spectfied width must be maintained.

*02 (moi CERTIFICATION PLAN
GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
The operator agrees to install cloth and gravel at area around heifer hay feeding
rings. One should figure 12 square feet (1'x 12') per animal when figuring amount of
geotextile cloth to install. The operator will need to buy 1080 sq. ft. of cloth (90hd
x12sq.ft./,hd=i080sq ft.. This will cover --either 14'x80' orr28'x40'-.) Gravel should be
poured at least 9 inches deep (54 tons). The waste from this area, as well as along
the fence line feeders should be removed every 60 days to avoid large accumulations
of waste and also aid in the ease of application. See attached Waste Utilization Plan
for areas to spread this waste. There will be no NCACSP funds involved in this
project, this is consistent with the operators request.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable
vegetation is not adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a
manner not permitted by its labeling.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District -if repairs or major
modifications are required for any of the components of this Waste Management
System.
Upon completion of all items involved in this plan, your operation will be certifiable.
This plan is for only the number of animals and acres listed in this plan. Please
notify the TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS) that signed your Waste Utilization Plan and
Certification form if operational changes take place. .

RGENCY ACTK)N PLAN
In case of an emergency with the storage pond such as overflow,
breaching, leakage, or the need for emergency land application; the
following actions should be taken:
1. Call the Division of Water Quality to report the problem
immediately. Your regional office of NCDEHNR-DWQ is located in
Mooresville, NC.
Address: NC Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville , NC 28115
Phone: [phone]
r -•If•the•emergency happens outside of normal business hours, call
the NC Emergency Management Office in Raleigh at [phone] and
ask them to contact DWQ. Give them the name of the facility,
location, and DWQ registration/certification number.
Facility Name:JOLI-HELL FARM
Location:End of SR 2357
DWQ Registration/ 49-32
Certification Number:
2. Call 911 or the Sheriff's Department at 878-3180 if there is
danger to downstream property such as residences, roads, etc.
3. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the
problem to minimize off-site damage. Some of the contractors in
your area include: Sam Chruch
(H) [phone]
(S) [phone]
4. Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage
,pond. If.this specialist is no longer working,'contact the MRCS
Area i office in Waynesville at [phone] or [phone].
Technical.Specialist: James F. Summers
Address: Iredell SWCD.
201 Water St
Statesville, NC 28677
Phone: (B) [phone]
(H) [phone]
5. In case emergency spreading of waste is necessary to prevent
overtopping or other discharges, please refer to your spreading records
and _the waste utilization plan to locate fields in which existing
conditions would allow for the spreading of waste, for the specific
application rates and minimum buffer.. These fields could include any
of the following:
TRACT # FIELDS
4446 4,10,11
This EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN should be posted in a readily available
location!
26

producer: Doli -Bell Farm
Location: At the end of SR 2357
Telephone:_ (704] 872-2130
Type Operation: Dairy Operation
Number of Animals: 200 milk cows
(Design Capacity) 150 cows for 365 days
Storage Structure(s): Waste Storage Pond
Application Method(s):Irrigate and haul
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
You must have the animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content
as close to the time of application as practical and at least within
60 days of the date of application before each application cycle.
Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must be
analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced
for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Lime must be
applied to application fields as recommended by soil test to
maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, (see Required Specification No. 4) waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year.

4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation
of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
.0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste
should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for
to reduce the potential for pollution,
applied to a growing crop. Otherwise
earlier than 30 days prior to planting
forages breaking dormancy. Injecting
incorporating the waste below the soil
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
crop production and
the waste should be
apply waste no
a crop or prior to
or otherwise
surface will conserve
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where
waste is applied shall be monitored and alternative
application fields shall be used when these metals approach
excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by irrigation/haul. If you
choose to alter the method(s) of application in the future, you need
to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various waste application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for dairy systems in North Carolina. Actual
acreage requirements shall be based on waste analysis reports from
storage structures in your waste management system. Attached you will
find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and
transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your Waste Storage Pond is designed for 270 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
9.0 MONTHS. If your facility is unroofed, in no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure be higher than the
maximum storage marker except in the event of a 25 year, 24 hour
storm.
Call your technical specialist after.you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.

The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization
plan shall be operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate
as an operator in charge of an animal waste management system. The
North Carolina Water Quality Commission will provide training and
certification of operators.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the
Water Quality Commission.

ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM LIQUID WASTE
IRRIGATION
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
224,090 cu ft per year*
224,090 cu ft per year X 7.48 gal/cu ft + 1,676,000 gallons/year
or 61.7 ac-in/yr
*Data provided by Sam Bingham, Engineer MRCS
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year from waste water.
6176 1000 gallon units per year X 6.3* lbs. PAN/1000 gallons of waste
10,5_99 lbs. PAN/year. (Use 10,500)
*Provided by MRCS Technical Guide Standards as instructed by Sam Bingham

ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM SOLID WASTE
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
90_(_10001b)animals X 67 lbs of waste/animal/day/.08% of day X 365 days
= 176,076, lbs of waste per year
176.076 lbs. of waste per year / 2000 = 88 tons of waste/yr
4.3 *Total PAN/ton X 88 tons = 378 _total lbs PAN/Yr
Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Guide 633-7 & 8
(Source of estimated or actual total nitrogen per 1000 gallons)

ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM SOLID WASTE
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
40 350 lb avg.) animals X 23 lbs of waste/animal/day/.08% X 365 days
= 26864 lbs of waste per year
26864 lbs. of waste per year / 2000 = 13.4 tons of waste/yr
4.3 lbs PAN per ton X 13.4 tons = 58 lbs total PAN/
* Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Guide 633-7 & 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM SOLID WASTE
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
60(2001b) animals X 13.2 lbs of waste/animal/day/.08% of day X 365 days
23,126 lbs of waste per year
23,162 lbs. of waste per year / 2000 = 11.5 tons of waste/yr
4.3 lbs PAN/ton X 11.5 tons = 49 total lbs PAN/yr
POUNDS OF WASTE/ANIMAL/DAY WAS FIGURED FROM NRCS STANDARD 633-7. 93 lbs
waste/animal/day for 1400 lb animal - 14 = 6.6 lbs/100 lbs body weight.
6.6 X 2 = 13.2 lbs waste/2001b animal/day.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Guide
(Source of estimated or actual total nitrogen per 1000 gallons)

Total animal waste and waste water volume generated in
one year is approximately 121.4 tons and
1.676.000 gallons or 61.7 acre-inches.
10.500 lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
waste
+ 485 lbs. PAN per year from solid
10.985 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job.
You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste
in a timely manner.
Values used above are based on analysis of waste
from similar livestock operations in North
Carolina (source: USDA-NRCS FOTG Practice Standard
633 -Waste Utilization). Actual nutrient content
of the waste from this system may vary from these
values. Waste analysis should be made of the
actual waste as soon as possible after significant
waste accumulates in the storage structure(s).
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be
over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers
in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.

The lagoon at your operation will accumulate sludge. This sludge must
be removed periodically and land applied at agronomic rates. The
sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures
to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
Your operation will produce approximately 4,738 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting the
sludge. Be aware that additional acres of land, as well as special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the infiltration
rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding
occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The
application amount should not exceed the available water holding
capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant
available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
It is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to
ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the
acres shown in tables 1 through 3. Failure to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying forage plants under
stress condition. Nitrate poisoning may occur in livestock. Sampling
forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.

WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are
available for waste application. It will not be necessary and may not
be desirable to apply waste to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual
nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the
potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the
Nitrogen that can be reasonably applied to the crop and used by the
crop in a timely manner using animal waste alone. It will not be
practical to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with animal
waste. Supplemental applications of commercial fertilizer may be
required during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient
needs. It is assumed that for certain row crops only a fraction of
the total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using animal
waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on
each field on the Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record
Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field
application tables:
CROP
CODE
CROP
PRODUCT -N
UNITS
NITROGEN
REQUIREM'T
LBS./UNIT
CG
CORN - GRAIN
BUSHELS
1.13
CS
CORN - SILAGE
TONS
11.0
HSG
HAY, SMALL GRAIN, NOT GRAZED
TONS
55
PCS
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
13.34
SOR
SORGHUM - SILAGE
WG
WHEAT - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
2.05

The following legend explains the soil codes which represent the
specific soil types that are found in the fields which are available
for animal waste application:
SOIL
SOIL
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
CODE
TYPE
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
AfB
Altavista fine sandy loam
(2-6%)
AsB2
Appling sandy loam
(2-6%,eroded)
AsC2
Appling sandy loam
(6-10%,eroded)
AsD2
Appling sandy loam
(10-15%,eroded)
CmB2
Cecil sandy loam
(2-6%,eroded)
CmC2
Cecil sandy loam
(6-10%,eroded)
Cw
Chewacla
Subject to frequent flooding
Wa
Warne & Roanoke
Poorly drained,
fine sandy loam
Seasonal water table 0-12" below
surface from Nov. -May.

:A %Tf k-5,49
i
NIMM-FIC, mm"Im I

sY^'y ''
�a �ls � �•

i') o ��
4 7L 3
- Q V &W
7Wp

Table I Worksheet: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Lbs. N Lbs. N
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to be to be
Hydrant Pull Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required Required Applied Applied
No. No. Code Code Yield/ac Useable Per Ac. Per Fld. PerAc/p1.2 PerFd/pl
1
1
AsC2
CS
17 ton/ac
5.0
187
935
83
415
2
1
AsC2
CS
17 ton/ac
7.6
187
1421
83
631
3
1
AsC2
CS
17 ton/ac
6.2
187
1159
83
515
4
1
AsC2
CS
17 ton/ac
8.0
187
1496
83
664
5
1
AsC2
CS
17 ton/ac
7.0
187
1309
83
581
6
1
AsC2
CS
17 ton/ac
9.1
187
1702
83
747
'
7
I 1
I Cw
I CS
1 22 ton/ac
10.5
1 187
1 2541
83 1
872
TOTALS THIS TABLE 53.4 xxxxxxx 10,563 XXXXXX 4,425
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer areas which border
streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, the
must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what is avails
0

Table 1 Worksheet: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Lbs. N Lbs. N
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to be to be
Hydrant Pull Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required Required Applied Applied
No. No. Code Code Yield/ac Useable Per Ac. Per Fld. PerAc/pl'2 PerFd/pl.
1
1
AsC2
SGS
10 ton/ac
5.0
120
600
83
415
2
1
AsC2
SGS
10 .ton/ac
7.6
120
912
83
631
3
1
AsC2
SGS
10 ton/ac
6.2
120
744
83
515
4
1
AsC2
SGS
10 tan/ac
8.0
120
960
83
664
5
1
AsC2
SGS
10 ton/ac
7.0
120
840
83
581
6
1
AsC2
SGS
10 ton/ac
9.1
120
1092
83
755
7
1
1 CW
I SGS
1 12 ton/acl
10.5
1 120
1 1260
1 83 1
872
TOTALS THIS TABLE 53.46 XXXXXXX 6408 XXXXXX 4433
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer areas which border
streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely wffl be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal 'waste only. Ifnutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, the
must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what Ls avails
0

Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field
No No
4466 1 4a
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4466
4b
4b
6
6
7
7
8
10
10.
10a
10b
10b
Soil
Type
Code
ASC2
AsC2
AsC2
CW
CW
AfB
AfB
CmB2
CmC2
CmC2
CmC2
CW
CW
Crop
Code
HCS
CS
SGS
SGS
CS
CS
SGS
HCS
CS
SGS
HCS
CS
SGS
Realistic
Anticipated Acresl
Yield Useable
Ston/ac
4.4ac
17ton/ac
2.6ac
Ston/ac
2.6ac
Ston/ac
19.6ac
22ton/ac
19.6ac
22ton/ac
21.7ac
10ton/ac
21.7ac
3.3ton/ac
5.Oac
17ton/ac
3.6ac
8ton/ac
3.6ac
3.3ton/ac
2.2ac
22ton/ac
2.5ac
10ton/ac
2.5ac
Recommended
Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Required to be
Per Ac. Appliedlfd2
225 990
187 486
88 229
88 1,725
242 4,723
242 5,252
110 2,387
149 745
187 673
88 317
149
329
242
605
110
275
TOTALS THIS TABLE : 111.6 18,735
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer
areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic
yield expectation,

•
Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS LEASED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
TOTALS THIS TABLE 59.3 7,284
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required
buffer areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in
the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.
soil
Realistic
Lbs. N
Lbs. N
to
Tract Field
Type
Crop
Anticipated
Acres 1
Required
to be
No. No.
Code
Code
Yield
Useable
Per Ac.
Applied2
4360
1
CmC2
PCs
3.3ton/ac
12.3ac
1113
1,365
4360
4
CmC2
PCs
3.3ton/ac
28.5ac
1113
3,163
4353
1
CmB2
A1f.Hay
3.3ton/ac
18.5ac
149
2,756
TOTALS THIS TABLE 59.3 7,284
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required
buffer areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in
the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.

Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen to be
applied using animal waste for all fields which are available for waste application.
SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
TOTAL CROP RECOMMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL
ACRES NITROGEN LBS. N TO OR RESIDUAL
USEABLE REQUIREMENT BE APPLIED LBS. OF N
IN POUNDS USING WASTE REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1 106.8 17,061 10,500 6,561
FROM TABLE 2 170.9 26,019 485 25,534
TOTALS 277.7 43,080 10,985 32,095
Amount of N Produced 10,985
Surplus or Deficit 32,095
I$-9?
This summary indicates that only about aS,5re,cent of the total annual nitrogen
requirements can be provided for the crops as listed for the fields available using
animal waste produced on this livestock operation.

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This plan is wrote for a milking herd of 200 cows, this plan
also includes the waste generated from '90'-1000 lb,'40'-350 lb
heifers and '60' 200 lb heifers.' All heifers weights are
averages because of age difference within the groups. All waste
generated by heifers is figured with heifers being at feed areas
.08% of a day. The milk herd is confined on a covered feed lot.
All parlor water is piped into the Waste Storage Pond. Roof
water is guttered away from this area and is not placed into WSP.
The WSP has a storage period of 270 days. The WSP is located
more than 100 ft. from the nearest well and more than 350 from a
dwelling. A safety rail will need to be replaced at the top of
the existing pushoff ramp. Livestock will not be allowed access
to the inside or outside slopes of the WSP. Woody growth will be
removed from the slopes as soon as it appears. This will help
guarantee the structural integrity of the dam itself.
The areas where heifers are being fed will have the manure hauled
off at least every 60 days and spread on the fields listed in the
Waste Utilization Plan at agronomic rates. A grass sod filter at
least 50 feet wide will need to be maintained along the stream
that runs through the heifer pastures. if this filter can be
maintained without a fence so be it, but a fence will have to be
constructed if this filter can not be maintained.
The waste generated by the heifers will be hauled and land
applied by using a spreader. The waste generated by the milk
herd will be land applied by an underground hydrant and main to
be installed by Brock irrigation Co.. The irrigation gun and
pump currently are on the farm. This waste will be applied in
the field listed in the Waste Utilization Plan and it will be
applied at agronomic rates also. The Joli-Bell farm has more
than enough cropland available to apply all waste (cows and
heifers) generated on this farm.

MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE
UTILIZATION OF WASTE.

Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to
the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2.—[The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at
the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a
Resource Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). If a RMS or ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will
be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in
addition to "Buffers" required by DWQ. [See FOTG Standard 393 -
Filter Strips and Standard_ 392 - Riparian Forest Buffer.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing or
any other condition exists which may cause a danger of drift from the
irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled crop and. When applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding, fSee "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in
a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No pondinshould
occur in order to control conditions conducive to odor or %ies and
provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the
plant. This is an important consideration where swine,oultry or
other ammonia rich waste is being surface applied. Surface broadcast
solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are matted.
Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25
percent of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a
concern where diluted, low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface
broadcast from a liquids holding structure. Where crops are severely
damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot assimilate the
nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also
be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a highpotential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple
application at lower rates should be used. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production & reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil, or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm
shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and
from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or
canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities sited on
or after October 1, 1995,) shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface wafer. (See_ Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying Animal
waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have
been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways which
discharge directly into water courses. If animal waste is to be applied
on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic
rates and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of ap roppriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon/ holding pond embankments, berms, pipe
runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these
areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon/holding pond
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon/holding pond
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved
closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal
discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps; reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be
applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during
the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top
and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain
the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested .at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining element. Zinc and
copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. Soil pH
shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for
five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC
regulations. North Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that
dead animals be disposed of within 24 hours in a manner approved
by the state veterinarian.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: W d �
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and.implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on-site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation
or other equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in
this Waste Utilization Plan. The equipment must be available at
the appropriate time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon,
holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage structure in a 25
year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will
be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate
times and at rates that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please
Affiliation: kool
Address (Agency):
Signature:
Date:
print ) J�65 f652
G�
fe56110-11C A16

r a NCgf._.
z 4,f+ •} ,�. lit f +.,. a+ CS�y, .n _.. ,,
i A �
� O 'd � � o �• �. � � ar r •� � d11 j
g �
M
I �r a m wlc vo.A.
��• ` SKYUK4 RP �
AV
1 N S AV 3d, .�4. O 1!
r � `
AQ �r q y04� ^�" ' • l � •, K x
'Wy Vt � yq
S tl a iiy
z v
-4
i
�� r r � `� � �s � N► 7tid771s .. ,C r � .
� wy -• • i
$a�v1 �O � � yµ°i i s��y y�nlaaaa C� f� /s ,k I.—.�.w.._.•—
VIA Y
SU
4'� YIyiMNO $ 8E sdA Xer �? <<fh KAY Ob aT 9iEZ NEa�I
r 6sca
c RC
4 UL yr► a 73d off I R �O NA
Y 13 tACN D
O Kir .Y$PN HEAD ND
HE ISZ
4 CA, lee
A
—2%
3111ANN11 / Q >M
y r
td� ♦ 'aa °
`tea Q •H'1153tl7 J C/ J 5�N
� p'a � a ply OHtlfJV � #NOSE rp 2
rR! PL F o 62
x
C�P�o1wi P R� A l} , �� Py tl1x313
l� 'in i+wrJY" s'nim sniw l lotil 69 ao MOW
\\\\
NHPUR
k,4 ad ad 9lti� Y I.M. R0, b
a� �, a i
i
►�'
N Roca
�NIA � 6N � DU�MWI
dft
_ O R0.
_ � � lf0 '1313183 "p
ofd M31+
-tea
m�
>
I T I I cI.
I_
Pu
r}
tl3>i3n
X
x
—
"aJa
GREENLRfER •
CHRYSNVTH
8
X232°
a �' �
liliak =
I �•'
i
�� r r � `� � �s � N► 7tid771s .. ,C r � .
� wy -• • i
$a�v1 �O � � yµ°i i s��y y�nlaaaa C� f� /s ,k I.—.�.w.._.•—
VIA Y
SU
4'� YIyiMNO $ 8E sdA Xer �? <<fh KAY Ob aT 9iEZ NEa�I
r 6sca
c RC
4 UL yr► a 73d off I R �O NA
Y 13 tACN D
O Kir .Y$PN HEAD ND
HE ISZ
4 CA, lee
A
—2%
3111ANN11 / Q >M
y r
td� ♦ 'aa °
`tea Q •H'1153tl7 J C/ J 5�N
� p'a � a ply OHtlfJV � #NOSE rp 2
rR! PL F o 62
x
C�P�o1wi P R� A l} , �� Py tl1x313
l� 'in i+wrJY" s'nim sniw l lotil 69 ao MOW
\\\\
NHPUR
k,4 ad ad 9lti� Y I.M. R0, b
a� �, a i
i
►�'
N Roca
�NIA � 6N � DU�MWI
dft
_ O R0.
_ � � lf0 '1313183 "p
ofd M31+
-tea

"-WON,
)I. �''!C"JI�` �•l'-�' - �'• �'` 1354 / \V'~�� �,-% III- �1\, ��.
,;; ,yet.J.
~ �.. �! i }-q5 �• i` �� 'lir �` � bye} � _ _
ot�..{'�• ��� �( ��� X11 i •'\.•1 �' � ,�rr J �.'
epoAk
.fly }� �en6\J: _ � �� I /l -� ✓ '� . .. � .. • I - Ji
�_J,,.
• -,, � � / } /.�) yes° ---� ` ` ��
;�ir�-A02!_ � ��•, 1 l � ��� /� � � � � ��� r � � Iii I [i � _
-;r-�' �+ • �' ' � 1 l I �� X11 w 1� � -•` � if
I f.:
- iii

Mortality Management Methods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
?! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water. V
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-I68.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. piacina in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
.� Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of'a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
A
Y ;.

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Bootee _ Cuuse RMPs to Coulr'ol Insects - -- Site Specific Pr'acliccs
I:luNIN 011tetn Accumulation of solids 17 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids frau IkIA
gutters as designed.
C7 Remove bridging of accumulaterl solids pt
soarge
Lagoon; :uul his a Crusted Solids f( Maintain lagoons, settling basins -and bits who
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more titian 6 -
)- inches over more than 30% of surface.
11AiesNive vcgclalive 0 Decaying vegetation _ Maintain vegetative: control along banks of
[ ao+vth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundmcnl's perimeter.
Dry Syslens _
! �eJc�:. -- - — • 1 ecd SlEtllage - Design, operate and maizrtain feed systems
bunkers and troughs) to mininize flit
cunttulation of decaying wastage.
- Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
[lay interval during simper; 15-30 day inlcrval
/dturing wintery. - -
Fecd Sto+aL:c • Al. 1111111AMIS of feet! residut - Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of Iced storage
ureas by insuring drait►agc away from site
au[Vor providing adequate containment (e.g.,
'vert' bin I'm brewer's grain and similar high
nnisture grain products).
Inspect lirr Ind remove or brc�tk u1i ;tccunulatctl
solids in lifter strips arotrrul feed storage as
needed.
AMIC - MA-111NA 11. 1996, Page 1

sibnrCC Cause RMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Praciiccs
Animal I lulding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes Eliminate low areas that trap moisture aloub
and feed wastage fences and oilier locations where waste
a emulates and disturbance by animals is
tinimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter 'strips around
animal holding areas to minimize_
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
eeded).
DI y Alanlue I Iandling • Accumulations of animal wastes _ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
S� �ierus clay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
ring winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Pr tde for adequate drainage around mamire
ockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filler strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
I'm inme inlOnnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina Stale 1 Iniversity,
Raleigh, NC, 27693-7613.
AKIN.- nhcr 11, 1996. Paget

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Bootee - - -- Cause Dn1Ps in nlfttfuriie Odor---- - - Site Specific 1'racticcs
I'a I,,.h:Jd - Dairy production ErrVegetative or wooded buffers
f liccommended best management practices
W Good judgment anti common sense
Paved lots or barn alley • Wet manure -covered surfaces j�crape or flush daily
Sa,rl:lCCS �/It
rmote drying wills proper ventilation
nuline checks and maintenance on waterers.
Hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
11CLISIc.1 .leas 0 Urine Promote drying'willt proper ventilation
• I'anial microbial decomposition Replace wet or mauurc-covered bedding
Al.oaure thy stacks • Partial microbial decomposition Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Stulage gush or basin _ • Partial microbial decomposition ; n Ilollom or mid-level loading;
suI lace • Mixing while filling ; n Tank covers
Agilalion when emplying n Basin surface !osis of solids;
0 Minimize lot ramoff and liquid additions
n Agitate only prior to manure removal
n I'rovcan biological additives or oxidants
5cnlinU h:Isin surl,accs Partial microbial decomposition Q Liquid drainage from settled solids
• Mixing; while filling C7 Remove solids regnl:arly
•
Agitation when emplying
Nhimrc, sully In- slutIge . Agitation when spreading s 1- Soil injection of slurry/sludges �C l,rcadcr uualca5 . Volatile gas emissions / I
f�' Waslr residual manure from spreader afier;Isc
C7 Proven binlogic(al additives or o1;id:nus _ _ _
I Inia,vcICd IllaIII11'e. • Volatile gas emissions while n Soil injection ofslurry/sImices
sherry uI sludge inI tield drying Vsoread
il incorporalion within X18 hrs
!.III(aces in thin uniform layers sur rapid drying
n Proven biological additives or oxidaws
I--lu-.h imil.s --- Agitation ofrccycled l agoou n Mush lank covers; - --- — --
tilpaid while tanks are filling n Gxlend fill lines to near Ununnl of t:auks wish
• anti -siphon Ycnls
d3a,asi& th din Cullcc(iuu • Agiuklion during wastewater n Box covers
ur ian,diuu blazes conveyance /
AAI()(' - 1•IuvclUl,cr 11. 1996. I'agc I

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor' Site Specific Practices
I.ifi siutions • Agitation during sump tank n Sump funk covers �.
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater Cl Extend discharge point of pipes underneat}i
lagoon conveyance /lagoon liquid level
Lagoon sill faces a Volatile gas emission; VC,
oper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; rrect lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
W/Minimum agitation when pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
L-1 Yrovcn biological additives
Iriigaiinn sprinkler • high pressure agitation; Z Irrigate on dry days wilh tilde or no wind;
uocrlt s Wind rlrift Cr Minimum recommended operating procedure;
Cl Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
n PP inp front second -slags lagoon;
Glnsh residual manure front pipes al enol of
I irrylsludge pumpings
Dkali altimals Carcass decomposition - — I' oyer disposition of carcasses - y�
St:ulding w iter :unontl Improper drainage; C� Ciratle and landscape such 11ra1 Seater drains
1.1c1b�ies Microbial decomposition ofatyay from Idacilides
organic utaller /j
Alud ir:scl.etl unto public • Poorly maintained access roads Ca/ mann access road maintenance
lisads 1141111 farm access
Additional InlOrnauiou : Available Flom:
Cauk Manure Managemeul ; 0200 Itule/BMP Packet NCSl1, County Extension Center
Dairy Filucalitinal Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Road Field laboratory ; EnAE 209-95 NCSI I - IIAI:
I.:1goo11 Design and Management Im livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; ERAIi 103-83 NCSI I - IIAE
AI:11tabcnic►tl of Dairy Waslc+valer ; EIIAI's 106-63 NC -SII - IIAI:
t •alibralion uf'At;,nure 111111 Waslewaler Application Equipment ; FItAF I -act Sheet NCSII - IiAE
t•inisance C'oaccrns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Coafere.tice Proceedings Florida Conperalive I?xttatsimn
AKWC lather 11, 1996, P:1ge2

Joli-Bell Dairy Farm
Owner - William (Rex) Bell
270 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
PLANNED DAIRY POPULATION - 200 MILK COWS
BASED ON CHANGES SINCE THE 1989 DESIGN, THE STORAGE PERIOD
IS NOW 270 DAYS. SEE ROUGH CALCULATIONS BELOW. SEE
NUTRIENT ESTIMATE UNDER SECTION E BELOW. The responsible
system designer should verify that assumptions are correct.
Waste Storage Pond for Runoff, Manure and Milking
Parlor .Wash Water -
A. Design Volumes
I. Normal Runoff for 270 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Iredell County.
Drainage Area = 15,840 sq ft
Surface = 15,840 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
Try 9 months:
Aug. - April
Surface Runoff Depth = 19.7611
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 8.9911
Surface Runoff= 19.76" * 15,840 sq ft = 26,083 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 8.991, * 0 sq ft = 0 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
34.3 - 23.1 = 11.2" = 1.0 £t/9 month
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
°s
DEPTH
's
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
"3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN..
.4 .19
-60-
2 .51
27
1.1.3
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74'
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 9 months:
Aug. - April
Surface Runoff Depth = 19.7611
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 8.9911
Surface Runoff= 19.76" * 15,840 sq ft = 26,083 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 8.991, * 0 sq ft = 0 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
34.3 - 23.1 = 11.2" = 1.0 £t/9 month

3.
25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 15,840 sq
ft = 6,481
cu
ft
12"/ft
4.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
5.
Freeboard + Emergency spillway
stage = 1.0
ft
ESW elevation redesigned in 1997 when system
reviewed
for
0.200 certification.
6.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
Volume = 5 gal/day/cow * 200 cows*1
cu ft/7.48
gal*
270
days
= 36,096 cu ft
7.
Manure Volume
Volume = 200 cows @ 14/gal/cow/day Q 270 days Q
75t
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 75,802 cu ft
B.
Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
26,083
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
..-,6,481
cu
ft
4.
Wash.water
36,096
cu
ft
5.
Manure Volume
75,802
cu
ft
TOTAL
144,462
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
1.0
ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
0.5
ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
Stage
1.0
ft
TOTAL
2.5
ft

i�
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
2.5:1
2.5:1
Approx. AS Built 151' X 184'
110' X 132'
/ 1.5:1
2.5:1
Volume = 7.8/6[1101* 1321+ 141.2 + 171` + 4(125.6* 151..5)]
= 149,212 cu ft
Normal Pump Out Volume
26,083 cu ft + 36,096 + 75,802 + 1.0 X 151 ft X 184 ft
= 165,765 cu ft per 270 days
= 224,090 cu ft per year
= 1,676,000 gal per year
= 559 - 3000 gallon loads
= 61.7 ac -in J,5"
Maximum pond level
0.5' + 1.0' + 6,481 cu ft/(24,600) (area from orig.
plan)
= 1.8' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
Z, -r
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 -hr storage volume. This 5
elevation.is 1.8 below the top of dam elevation of the pond.
The emergency spillway elevation is 1.0 foot below the top
of dam elevation.
Top of Dam Elevation - 106.5
Maximum Pump Out Elev Allowed - 104.7
Max. Pump Out Elev. Set by Field Office 3-18-97 104.2
Bottom Elevation - 96.2
E. Nutrient Estimate
200 Milk Cows - 75% confinement and manure collection
From Waste Utilization Standard
200 cows X 75% X -70 lbs PAN/cow/year
= 10,500 lbs PAN/year
Estimated N content = 10,500 lbs PAN/1,676,000 gallons r
= 6.3 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
= 170 lbs PAN per ac -in ��+

F. Ideal Pumping Time
The ideal pumping time is 30 days prior to corn
planting through corn planting. If manure applied to
pasture or small grain, application amount maybe limited by
the nitrogen content of slurry.

Joli-Bell Dairy Farm
Owner - William (Rex) Bell
270 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
PLANNED DAIRY POPULATION - 200 MILK COWS
BASED ON CHANGES SINCE THE 1989 DESIGN, THE STORAGE PERIOD
IS NOW 270 DAYS. SEE ROUGH CALCULATIONS BELOW. SEE
NUTRIENT ESTIMATE UNDER SECTION E BELOW. The responsible
system designer should verify that assumptions are correct.
Waste Storage Pond for Runoff, Manure and Milking
Parlor .Wash Water
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 270 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Iredell. County.
Drainage Area = 15,840 sq ft
Surface = 15,840 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
Try 9 months:
Aug.'- April
Surface Runoff Depth = 19.76"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 8.99"
Surface Runoff= 1.9.76" * 15,840 sq ft = 26,083 cu ft
12 in/ft , -
Unsurface Runoff= 8.99" * 0 sq ft = 0 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
34.3 - 23.1 = 11.211 = 1.0 ft/9 month
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
$
DEPTH
t
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
_4.19...
•60
2.51
27
1.13
1.4.
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7 .
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 9 months:
Aug.'- April
Surface Runoff Depth = 19.76"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 8.99"
Surface Runoff= 1.9.76" * 15,840 sq ft = 26,083 cu ft
12 in/ft , -
Unsurface Runoff= 8.99" * 0 sq ft = 0 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
34.3 - 23.1 = 11.211 = 1.0 ft/9 month

( 0 b
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 15,840 sq ft = 6,481 cu ft
12"/ft
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" _ .5 ft
z5 Freeboard + Emergency spillway.stage = 1.0 ft
ESW elevation redesigned in 1997 when system reviewed
for 0.200 certification.
6. Milking Parlor Wash Water
Volume = 5 gal/day/cow * 200 cows*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 270 days
= 36,096 cu ft
7. Manure Volume
Volume = 200 cows @ 14jcFalZcowZdav @ 270 days Q 75%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 75,802 cu ft
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
26,083
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour -runoff
6,481
cu
ft
4.
Wash water
36,096
cu
ft
5.
Manure Volume
75,802
cu
ft
TOTAL
144,462
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
1.0
ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5
ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
Stage
1.0
ft
TOTAL
2.5
ft

C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
2.5:1
2.5:1
Approx. AS Built 151" X 184'
110' X 132'
C0
/ 1.5:1
2.5:1
Volume = 7.8/6[1101* 1321+ 141.2 + 171' + 4(125.6* 151.5)]
= 149,212 cu ft
Normal Pump Out Volume =
26,083 cu ft + 36,096 + 75,802 + 1.0 X 151 ft X 184 ft
= 165,765 cu ft per 270 days
= 224,090 cu ft per year
= 1,676,000 gal per year
= 559 - 3000 gallon loads
= 61.7 ac -in
Maximum pond level
0.5' + 1.0' + 6,481 cu ft/(24,600) (area from orig.,
plan)
= 1.8' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 1.8 below the top of dam elevation of the pond.
The emergency spillway elevation is 1.0 foot below the top
of dam elevation.
Top of Dam Elevation - 106.5
Maximum Pump Out Elev Allowed - 104.7
Max. Pump Out Elev. Set by Field Office 3-18-97 104.2
Bottom Elevation - 96.2'
E. Nutrient Estimate
200 Milk Cows - 7516 confinement and manure collection
From Waste Utilization Standard
200 cows X 75k X -70 lbs PAN/cow/year
= 10,500 lbs PAN/year'
r -
Estimated N content = 10,500 lbs PAN/1,676,000 gallons
6.3 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
= 170 lbs PAN per ac -in ���

F. Ideal Pumping Time
The ideal pumping time is 30 days prior to corn
planting through corn planting. If manure applied to
pasture or small grain, application amount maybe limited by
the nitrogen content of slurry.

Brock Equipment Co,,-,,
PO Box 100
BAILEY, N.C. 27807
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
This irrigation system was designed by Shane Ward of Brock Equipment Co.
A scaled drawing, required calculations, and required specifications on pipe and equipment
are included.
The following buffers were maintained on this farm:
25 feet from ditch
75 feet from surface water and perennial streams
25 feet from property lines
200 feet from residence
I00 feet from well
All continents and recommendations are appreciated.
Thank you,
Shane Ward

�r
*raveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Travel speed = 4 fpm
Application rate -.37 fpm
Lane spacing — 340'
Wetted diameter = 425'
Gun make and size = Nelson 200
Nozzle size - 1.2"
OpelrafinB PMMM at gun - 90 Psi
Opemft pmwm at reef - 115 psi
Operaft pn wm at pump =129 psi
Arc pattern = 3300 .
Flow rate of sprinkler - 405 ppm
Pump power regwrement (bhp) - 57
Total am covered (effective) - 51.07
Traveler make and model = Cadman 4500
Hose length = 1175'
Hose dWmcr (ID) - 4.5
Spend compensation meel cal
UAUM rumher
1
Effective i-angh
745
Effice" Waft
340
Arm Covered
5.81
2
805.
340
6.28
3
915
340
7.14
4
1,015
340
7.92.
5
740
340
5.78
6
1,190
340
9.29
7
I,Z15
340
9.48
Total:
. 51.07

r•
Joli-Bell. Dairy Farm
Owner - William.(Rex) Bell
270 Nabors Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
r
PLANNED DAIRY POPULATION - 200 MILK COWS
(0
BASED ON CHANGES SINCE THE 1989 DESIGN, THE STORAGE PERIOD
IS NOW 270 DAYS. SEE ROUGH CALCULATIONS BELOW. SEE
NUTRIENT ESTIMATE UNDER SECTION E BELOW. The responsible
system designer should verify that assumptions are correct.
Waste Storage Pond for Runoff, Manure and Milking
.Parlor Wash Water
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 270 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Iredell County.
Drainage Area = 15,840 sq ft
Surface = 15,840 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
Try 9 months:
Aug. - April
Surface Runoff Depth ='19.76"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 8.99"
Surface Runoff= 19.76" * 15,840 sq ft = 26,083 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 8.99" * 0 sq ft = 0 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
34.3 - 23.1 = 11.2" = 1.0 ft/9 month
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
DEPTH
k
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
'3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.,
4.19
60
2.51 ...
27
1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55'
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 9 months:
Aug. - April
Surface Runoff Depth ='19.76"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 8.99"
Surface Runoff= 19.76" * 15,840 sq ft = 26,083 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 8.99" * 0 sq ft = 0 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
34.3 - 23.1 = 11.2" = 1.0 ft/9 month

C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
2.5:1
2.5:1
rox. AS Built 151-' X 184'
110' X 132'
1.5:1
2. 5:1
Volume = 7.8/6[1101* 1321+ 141.2 + 171' + 4(125.6* 151.5)]
= 149,212 cu ft
Normal Pump Out Volume
26,083 cu ft + 36,096 + 75,802 + 1.0 X 151 ft X 184 ft
= 165,765 cu ft per 270 days
= 224,090 cu ft per year
= 1,676,000 gal per year
= 559 - 3000 gallon loads
= 61.7 ac -in Jti�
Maximum pond level
0.5' + 1.0' + 6,481 cu ft/(24,600) (area from orifi.
plan)
= 1.8' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level. reaches. the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume.- This..
elevation. is 1.8 below the top of dam elevation of the pond.
The emergency spillway elevation is 1.0 foot below the top
of dam elevation.
Top of Dam Elevation - 106.5
Maximum Pump Out Elev Allowed - 104.7
Max. Pump Out Elev. Set by Field Office 3-18-97 104.2
Bottom Elevation - 96.2
E. Nutrient Estimate
200 Milk Cows - 75% confinement and manure collection
From Waste Utilization Standard
200 cows X 75% X -70 lbs PAN/cow/year
10,500 lbs PAN/year
Estimated N content = 10,500 lbs PAN/1,676,000 gallons d
= 6.3 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
170 lbs PAN per ac -in t1.

3.
25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.9111
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 15,840 sq ft = 6,481
cu ft
12"/ft
4.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
5.
Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.0
£t
ESW elevation redesigned in 1997 when system
reviewed
for
0.200 certification.
6.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
Volume = 5 gal/day/cow * 200 cows*1 cu ft/7.48
gal* 270
days
= 36,096 cu ft
7.
Manure Volume
Volume = 200 cows @ 14/ctal/cow/day @ 270 days @
75k
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 75,802 cu ft
B.
Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff 26,083
cu ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff 0
cu ft
3.
25 year -- -24 hour runoff -6, 4 81:,
cu.. ft4.
Wash water 36,096
cu ft
5.
Manure Volume 75,802
cu ft
TOTAL 144,462
cu ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
1.0
ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
0.5
ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.0
ft
TOTAL
2.5
ft

( * .
F. Ideal Pumping Time
The ideal pumping time is 30 days prior to corn
planting through corn planting. If manure applied to
pasture or small grain, application amount maybe limited by
the nitrogen content of slurry.

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Plcase type or orinc all infor pati+.n dial doe; not rzuuire :h sisa.tturr�
E.Yistin� o� .: die«
or `:':'Expanded ':'(pie se circle.one}
General information:
Name of Farm:loli-Be
7?1�—
Owners) Name: wj i i i nTn Rp,_7 ` T -Phone No: _(704) 872-2130
_ SEP 2waiiinAddress: 2 0Nab rs Rd.
Farm
--
Locarron: County Farm is loca,tcdrj:U r cyeaF,T10N
• �; r� � � ;,h�liariCB 1i ,
Latitude and Lonuitude: ig_ 44 3/ -$B_4.8 40
Pease attach a cucv of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
C.
names. directions. mii.zpost. e.C.): Approx. 2 miles ,of 1-77 on jt4z 70E, turn right onto SR 2357.
Take left hand fork and Ro to end of S 2357
Ooeration Descriotion:
Type of Swine No. of.-knimals
Wean to Feeder
* Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
:1 Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
* Gilts
J Boars
Type of Poultry
O Layer
Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Carne , 0. of Animals
Dairy 200
J Beef
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
.Acreage .available for .application: Required Acreage: 589
Number of Lagoons/ Storage Ponds: I Total Capacity: j s--6 386 Cubic Feet (ft})
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
,I,at,ilsia�ie�,+ii,M,ia,ieMMd,si++k�,Mirei�ses,ye�w�MMa'ahaa�Ms,Y,,ys,k*s,hs,*�i+a;.+Ra!,i�Mtcx+i��iaisi��Mackixt,aiiais,kaaXCMaL�Mx�eri*MasKMia�
Owner/ l Tanager Aareement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. i (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment aihd
storage System or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Envirunmentai Nlanagetnent before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be. no discharge of
animal waste from rhe storage or application system to surface waters of die state tidier directly throu;h a mail -made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. 1 (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging Lind heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservadon Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at tba farm and at the Office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
MUSE be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEti[ or a newcertification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days at a 'fie transfer.
Name of Land Owner :
Si -nature: _ _ Date:
game a(Nlana;er(i( die treat from uwn�.)
Si,nature: Date: -
ati�'C .Augu5L 1. 1997 1
UVA,T Eft QUALITY SECPON
r:on-Diceharre Compliance Enf.

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the north Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to l A
NCAC 6F .0005. I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEN(} as specified in I5A :�C.aC 2H.0317 and the USDA -Natural Resourc;s Conservation Service (NRCS) and,m the
ril
North Carolina Soil aWater Conservation Commission pursuant to 13A NCAC 2H.0217 and UA &NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following eletnen&are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent. r
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storarre. Treatment System
Cileck rite appropriate box
�sl Exi tins facility w'thout recroft (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: storage cambiliEV cOnsiscent :eitit W t to utilization
requirements.
J
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
.animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. Iagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Iredell Date Work Comp
S
IR -3
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): James F. Summers
Affiliation Iredel,l SWCD Date Work Completed:
Address ( _enc:y): 201 w to st Phone \1U.: (704 )873-6761
S i�,nature: — • Date: .i f
C'
Check the appropriate box
Z Facility without ext 'or to -SSD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by N -RCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Pt-int):
-kfttlla[ion Iredell SWCD
Address (A
Signature:
AWC -- Aub
Date Work Completed:

D;. Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing or expanding facility with existing waste application a ui met (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for thring of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
ISI' New. ex anded or existin facilit without existing waste application a ui ment forspray
irrigation. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be tAaintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
0 New— exvanded, or existing facility without existing waste aoulication eauinment for land
S-Duadinl ?lot usingspi-gy 1r,-gation., (W -UP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by t,ie
plan at races not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan). /
"Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):F—_
Affiliation: 13roc.'C V- (�qGc ilrr�a.. �irZ— Ca
Address(Agency);
Signature:
E) Qdor Control—Insect Control, Mortality Managernent_and-Emergency Action Plan (SD,_
SI WUP RC gr i
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Actibn Plana Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): .Tames F. summers
Affiliation: lredeii SWCD
Address
Sig
zone No.: ( 704) $ 3-6761
ate:
F) Written Mice of New or Expanding Swine Fa
The following signature' -block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that i (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoirvng property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.. -
Name of Land Owner:��--
r
Signature: Date:— 137
-
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature Date•
ANVC -- January 1, 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Stgrage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without.retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
IS] The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
© Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establistr the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate
for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): .lames F. Summers
Affiliation:Iredell SWCD
Address (Agap cy): 201 WaterZt.Statesville, NC Phone No.. 704 873-6761
Signature: Date:
This followkuh, signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in -111. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the inrerim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: /,Jt.( 14A,- �'� /7 �e.// _ _ \-)19// ` ZX./�/
Signature: tXL� V .� Date: �" 8 Z'
Nance of Vlanager(if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- January 1, 1997
Date:

r C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility %vith z:cterior 101.5 �-
�letliuda w minimize die run off of pollutants Crum lounein,2 and heat use : reli hav, bctn inimlled as jcecir1e,1
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots. no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Iredell SWCD
Address
Sip Urz:
) Apnlic
Check the
ncy):
nd Handlinz Equipment Installation (WL P or I)
Phone yo.:
Date:
0'ropriare blocs
.animal waste appCcation and handling equipment specified in the plan is o:: site and ready for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are comained'as part or the plan.
J animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the. plan has not been ins4illed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibraciun and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part or the plan.
`.l Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the pian.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Lt c
Affiliation roc Y Date Work Completed: X —1'2—
Address (A�ency): -P oX %d O �,lr 27�fd Phone
Signature: Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) Certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical. Specialist within IS calendar days rollowin_ the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from} DEM
Wlz'd
Name of Land Owner: C cl d 1
r
Signature:LtdC�— Date: — D 70
—
Name of Manager (if different from owner):_Signature: Date:
Date•
E) Odor Control. Trisect Control and Mortality yfana-ement (SD. SL WUP. RC or 1)
titethods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plant have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Pian has also been.instaW and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation DELL. Date Work Comole:ed:2,
r-
Address (. ricy): 1 74�11(L(4' A A6 Phone No.:L;t
Signature: - 11 Dater
.-V,LVC .. ,ku-t it t, 19y7

Please return the completed form to the Division ofa;Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Bos 2953
Raleigh, INC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
ylanagement Pian to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- August 1, 1997 6