20170921 Ver 1_eApproval for MOD SAW-2017-01472_20190517

Strickland, Bev
From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 12:34 PM
To: Baumgartner, Tim
Cc: Crocker, Lindsay; Wicker, Henry M Jr CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Tugwell, Todd J CIV
USARMY CESAW (US); Bowers, Todd; Brittingham, Cathy; Wells, Emily N;
[e-mail]; Wilson, Travis W.; Twyla Cheatwood; Haupt, Mac; Davis,
Erin B; [e-mail]; McLendon, C S CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Subject: [External] eApproval for MODIFICATION of NCDMS Major Hill Mitigation
Site/Alamance County/ SAW -2017-01472 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attachments: Modification eApproval Letter -Major Hill_SAW-2017-01472.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<maiIto: [e-mail]>
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Mr. Baumgartner,
Attached is the Major Hill Mitigation Plan Modification approval letter and copies of all comments generated during the
project review (No comments were received). Please note that this letter approves the modification to the Final
Mitigation Plan.
Please let me know if you have any questions about the process or the attached letter.
V/ R,
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Dr, Ste. 105 1 Wake Forest, NC 27587 1 919.554.4884 x60
BUILDING STRONG (r)
-----Original Message -----
From: TugwelI, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 4:03 PM
To: [e-mail]; Brittingham, Cathy <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; Travis Wilson ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Twyla
Cheatwood <[e-mail]>; Mac Haupt <[e-mail]>; Erin Davis <[e-mail]>
Cc: Lindsay Crocker <[e-mail]>; Wicker, Henry M Jr CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Notice of NCDMS Mitigation Plan Modification/Major Hill Mitigation Site/Alamance County, SAW -2017-01472

0
The below referenced mitigation plan modification has been requested by NCDMS. Per Section 332.8(g) of the 2008
Mitigation Rule, this modification follows the streamlined review process, which requires an IRT review period of 30
calendar days from this email notification. Please provide any comments by 5 PM on the 30 -day comment deadline
shown below. When providing comments please indicate if your concerns are great enough that you intend to initiate
the Dispute Resolution Process described in Section 332.8(3) of the Mitigation Rule. Comments provided after the 30 -
day comment deadline (shown below) may not be considered.
At the conclusion of this comment period, a copy of all comments will be provided to NCDMS and the NCIRT along with
District Engineer's intent to approve or disapprove this requested modification.
Proposed modification of credits approved in the mitigation plan due to as -built conditions - see attached documents for
further explanation.
Approved Mitigation Plan Assets: 3,006 SMUs and 0.760 WMU (riparian riverine) Requested Revised As -built Assets:
3,058 SMUs and 0.760 WMU Project Name: Major Hill Full Delivery, Restoration Systems DMS Project # 100015 Cape
Fear 03030002 - Alamance County Project instituted: 5/22/2017 USACE Action ID# 2017-01472 NCDWR # 2017-0921
NCDEQ- DMS PM: Lindsay Crocker - [e-mail] 30 -Day Comment Start Date: April 15, 2019 30 -Day
Comment Deadline: May 14, 2019 60 -Day Intent to Approve Deadline: June 12, 2019
Please contact the Wilmington District Mitigation Office if you have questions.
Todd Tugwell
Mitigation Project Manager
Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
[phone] ext. 58
-----Original Message -----
From: Crocker, Lindsay [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 3:54 PM
To: Haupt, Mac <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc:'worth@ restorationsystems.com' <[e-mail]>; Raymond Holz
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Major Hill Mitigation Plan Addendum
WH
Per our discussion after the 4/9 Tuesday IRT meeting, we are amending the Major Hill Mitigation Plan numbers as
described below and with the following information that will be appended to the Mitigation Plan (attached). Please let
me know if there is anything else you will require or if I have misunderstood anything. If I do not hear back by the end of
next week (4/19), 1 will prepare and send the auto -release ledger. Thanks very much,
Major Hill

Full Delivery, Restoration Systems
DMS Project # 100015
Cape Fear 03030002 - Alamance County
Project instituted: 5/22/2017
USACE Action ID# 2017-01472
NCDWR # 2017-0921
Mitigation Plan Assets: 3,006 SMUs and 0.760 WMU (riparian riverine)
Revised Approved As -built Assets: 3,058 SMUs and 0.760 WMU
Lindsay
Lindsay Crocker
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones St., Raleigh, NC 27603
Office 919.707.8944
Cell 919.594.3910
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
,:ern
May 17, 2019
Regulatory Division
Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the Modification of the Major Hill Mitigation Plan; SAW -
2017 -01472; NCDMS Project # 100015
Mr. Tim Baumgartner
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Mr. Baumgartner:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) with all comments generated by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT) during
the 30 -day comment period for the Modification of the Major Hill Mitigation Plan, which closed on May
14, 2019. These comments are attached for your review.
Based on our review of these comments, we have determined that no major concerns have been
identified with the revision of the Final Major Hill Mitigation Plan, which is considered approved with
this correspondence.
The following modifications were approved are attached to this document:
Proposed modification of credits approved in the mitigation plan due to as -built conditions.
Original Approved Mitigation Plan Assets: 3,006 SMUs and 0.760 WMU (riparian riverine)
Requested Revised As -built Assets: 3,058 SMUs and 0.760 WMU
If you have any questions regarding this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the
requirements of the Mitigation Rule, please call me at 919-554-4884, ext 60.
Sincerely,
BROWN ING.KIMBERLY.DANIELLE.15
27683510
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager
for Henry Wicker
Enclosures
Digitally signed by
BROWNING.KIMBERLY.DANIELLE.1527683510
Date: 2019.05.17 12:27:36 -04'00'
Electronic Copies Furnished: NCIRT Distribution List, Lindsay Crocker NCDMS
Worth Creech — Restoration Systems, LLC

ADDENDUM TO MITIGATION PLAN
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Major Hill Restoration Site
Overall Assets Summary: Amended Mitigation Plan
Stream 3058 SMU
Riparian Riverine Wetland: 0.760 WMU
*UTI, UT2, and UT3 discrepancies between Mitigation Plan and As -built tables are the result of errors between detailed plan stationing and surveyed
construction plan stationing. They are specifically attributed to typographical error, GIS to CAD conversion error, and easement boundary changes
between detailed plan development and construction plans. Construction Plan information is consistent from Mitigation Plan to As -Built, and the As -
Built table reflects Construction Plan measurement accuratly.
Project No. 100015
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019
MitigationConstructed
Stream
Existing
Restoration or
Reach
Plan
Restoration
Mitigation
Mitigation
Stationing/
Footage/
Footage/
Restoration
Comment
ID
Foage/
Footage/
FootAcreage
Level
Ratio
Credits
Wetland Type
Acreage
Equivalent
Acreage
UT 1
00+00 to 16+99
1829
1699
1699
Restoration
1699
1:1
1699
UT 1
16+99 to 27+96
1097
1060
1097*
EII
1097
2.5:1
439
UT 2
00+00 to 01+68
168
168
168
EII
168
2.5:1
67
UT 2
01+68 to 02+07
39
43
39*
Restoration
39
1:1
39
801f and 401f of UT3 are
not credit generating due
to crossings and drainage
UT 3
00+00 to 22+98
2298
2197
2298*
EII
2298-80-144-
2'5'1
814
easement. 144 if are not
40=2034
credit generating due to
lack of control of south
bank and drainage
easement.
Riparian
Wetlands
0.54
0.54
Restoration
0.54
1:1
0.54
Wetland Restoration
Riverine
Riparian
Wetlands
0.52
0.44
0.44
Enhancement
0.44
2:1
0.22
Wetland Enhancement
Riverine
Overall Assets Summary: Amended Mitigation Plan
Stream 3058 SMU
Riparian Riverine Wetland: 0.760 WMU
*UTI, UT2, and UT3 discrepancies between Mitigation Plan and As -built tables are the result of errors between detailed plan stationing and surveyed
construction plan stationing. They are specifically attributed to typographical error, GIS to CAD conversion error, and easement boundary changes
between detailed plan development and construction plans. Construction Plan information is consistent from Mitigation Plan to As -Built, and the As -
Built table reflects Construction Plan measurement accuratly.
Project No. 100015
Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alamance County, North Carolina March 2019

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
March 5, 2019
Mr. Worth Creech
Restoration Systems, L.L.C.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-215-1693
RE: Major Hill Stream and Wetland Restoration Site - Asbuilt Discrepancies 17-009
Dear Worth:
During preparation of the As -built Construction Plans and Baseline Document for the Major Hill
Stream and Wetland Restoration Site it became apparent that a stationing discrepancy occurred
during detailed planning. Stationing discrepancies are listed in the following table and are depicted
on the following page.
Please note, Construction Plan and As -built stationing are consistent. The discrepancy between the
Detailed Restoration Plan and Construction Plans are not certain, but likely result from easement
boundary changes between Detailed Plan figure development and Construction Plan preparation,
GIS conversion errors, and/or typographical error. These problems are being resolve for future
submissions.
The final Asbuilt stationing matches the Construction Plans and depict what was
constructed/enhanced at the Site.
The original SMU total calculated for the Detailed Restoration Plan was 3006 SMUs. The Asbuilt
SMU total calculated for the Asbuilt Construction Plans and Baseline document is 3058 SMUs.
Detailed
Construction
As -built
UT
Plan
Plan
Plan
Numbe
End Station
End Station
End Station
r
UT 1
27+59
27+96
27+96
UT 2
02+11
02+07
02+07
UT 3
21+97
22+98
22+98
Please note, Construction Plan and As -built stationing are consistent. The discrepancy between the
Detailed Restoration Plan and Construction Plans are not certain, but likely result from easement
boundary changes between Detailed Plan figure development and Construction Plan preparation,
GIS conversion errors, and/or typographical error. These problems are being resolve for future
submissions.
The final Asbuilt stationing matches the Construction Plans and depict what was
constructed/enhanced at the Site.
The original SMU total calculated for the Detailed Restoration Plan was 3006 SMUs. The Asbuilt
SMU total calculated for the Asbuilt Construction Plans and Baseline document is 3058 SMUs.

Detailed Plan - Fi ug re 6 (Restoration Plan)StationinUTI UTg
End Rasioralion End Enhance erii II
UT 2 Start Enhancement I Sta 27+59 - -
- End Restoratl n Sts 'I E+99 '
r' Sta 42+11 Eleu 510.75 r:
Elev 526-42
-1-
T' jF -
Construction Plan - Sheet 1 Stationing
LM-trr c -
STA 2 #0'
06
I
Lm
Major Hill-Asbuilt Discrepancies
March 5, 2019
Page 2 of 3
T � ''i• � s ` r ''�
�r3
' End Enhanc mens
Sta 21+'17
3„r .
v
NI-
Na -7ull-

Based on information provided above we request a credit alteration at the Site. The credit alteration
results from stationing discrepancies from the Detailed Restoration Plan and Construction Plans. The
alteration is in the amount of 52 SMWs and represents what was constructed/enhanced at the Site.
Yours truly,
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
W. Grant Lewis
President
Major Hill-Asbuilt Discrepancies
March 5, 2019
Page 3 of 3