490021_PERMIT FILE_20171231

AziWLA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H• Sullins
Governor Director -
October 23, 2009
Stanley T. Stikeleather
Stanley Dairy
159 Nottingham Cir.
Statesville, NC 28625-8287
Subject: Erroneous Issuance of General Permit, and
Confirmation of Permit Rescission
Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490021
Stanley Dairy
Iredell County
Dear Stanley T. Stikeleather:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Reference is made to the General Permit mailed to you on October 1, 2009. That permit,was
mailed in error, and is not valid. This letter is to confirm that the permit rescission mailed to you
on February 25, 2009 is still valid. We apologize for any. confusion that this may have caused.
Please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit at [phone] if it would be
helpful to discuss this matter -further.
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
11,11 w re.% w(//,
cc: Regional Office
Permit File AWC490021
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 hail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] R FAX 1: 91n-"/1>-ta388; FAX 2: 9}9.715 6048 L Custorner Service: 1.877-623.6748
Internet: www.ncwateroualitv.oro
olte
No ChCaro1'n:
turai&
An Equal C?gpr,rt�anliy 1 Atfif311FitiVo Artian {.�:rnn�nyer

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection mw_�
O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ®Routine Complain Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: %2/z"iAKi I Arrival Time: i� = Departure Time; � County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: tYTe �Q Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: -up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ ❑ ` ❑" Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ ` ❑
� MANS -
� ,�(, "tF •t. y �w Sri , n y, j i. -. • i7 t. �•' . r }.. 1 4 ; s - - • • ._.' %, i'•
S- , 1 i ti ,y �.: fR" '11•
Design I Current, Design Current w � ; Design. Current
Swine v F " apacity'Population'. ' kkYwii Poultry C�pacity:'Populatton = Cattic x•;,,+n�, Capacity Population
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
L
❑ Layer
�' ❑ Non -Layer
use •x' a' ��� a. Zu r ' L �Ev•
Dry Poultry F ;F �. x g s
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑
Turkey Poults
❑
Other
S�!airy Cow
2bb
Dair Calf
O
ai Heifei
"0
ry Cow
PNon-Dairy
L- D
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
ier Number of Structures:.r l
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. hoes discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
0
❑Yes ❑No [I NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
[I Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
❑ NA ❑ E
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ E
❑Yes
❑No
El NA ❑N
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (iri):
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Structure 5 Structure
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ElYes ElNo ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l 0 lbs . ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[:]
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
414.a' "r _*pry r
Phone-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
NE
NE
NE
NE
Q
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
J
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WCp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑Yes El No El NA
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certi
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather C
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document.
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
NE
NE
NE
tion
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[I Yes ❑No ❑NA J❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA M NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA .[I] NE
vvvs }�v .
12128104

Re: 49-21
Subject: Re: 49-21
From: James Bealle <j ames. bealle@ncmail. net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:07:06 -0500
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
J.R.,
No issues. Thanks for your assistance on this...
jb
J. R. Joshi wrote:
I have received a "closure" form from Stanley Dairy in Iredell County. I am assuming they have
your blessings...
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James Bealle <james.healle(a,ncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/D WQ/APS
of 1 2/25/2009 2:08 PM

Stanley Stikeleather WSP closure plan.
Subject: Stanley Stikeleather WSP closure plan.
From: "Summers, James - Statesville, NC" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:55:10 -0500
To: <[e-mail]>
James,
Here is the WSP closure plan for Stanley Stikeleather. If you want
signed drawings I will have to snail mail that to you. Let me know.
The WSP closure plan will follow application rate in current WUP on file
and attached is the spreadsheet for the designated sludge application
field,the photo for this sludge field is also in current WUP. Call or
email if you have questions.
Thanks,
Jim
Jim Summers
District Soil Conservationist/Department Head
Iredell Soil & Water Conservationist District
444 Bristol Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677
704-873-6761
Waste Storage Pond Closure
! Content -Description: Plan.doc
Waste Storage Pond Closure Plan.doc,'1 Content -Type: application/msword
Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Description: sludgeamountsPAN.xls
sludgeamountsPAN.xls l Content -Type: application/vnd:ms-excel
I Content -Encoding: base64
of 1 4/9/2008 5:06 PM

Stanley Stikeleather Dairy
Waste Storage Pond Closure Plan
August 10, 2007
Funding provided by
The NC Foundation for Soil & Water Conservation, Inc.
Tract: 8473
County:
Iredell
Latitude:
35 47' 49”
Longitude:
80 48' 13"
Facility Number
49-21
HU Code
030401020230020 Fourth Creek
Owner:
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28625
Plan Prepared By:
Jim Summers
District Soil Conservationist Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, NC 28677 '
Location: This farm is approximately 3.5 miles north of Hwy 70 on Bell Farm Road. The farm will
be on the right side of Bell Farm Road.
General: On the night of November 23. 2007 a tornado damaged this dairy operation beyond
repair. This waste storage pond was built in 1985 for 100 cows with a 180 day storage period.
The sludge from this wsp will be applied on tract # 8473 fd. #S4 in Iredell County. Mr.
Stikeleather will be pull a sludge sample and sludge application rates will be based on this
sample.
Note: Iredell SWCD staff or Iredell NRCS staff will make periodical inspections while
closure operation is taking place to insure standards and specifications are being
followed.
The owner is responsible for notifying NC DWQ that work is taking place and upon
completion.

SPECIFICATIONS:
The closure of the waste storage pond will be completed in accordance with the standards and
specifcations outlined in the Closure of Waste Impoundments, (360) Section IV of the NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide. The liquid waste will be spread at agronomic rates in accordance to the
facility's existing waste utilization plan and analysis from 5-7-07 waste sample report. The
remaining sludge will then be scraped to remove any existing sludge. This sludge will be land
applied in accordance with the attached nutrient management plan. The material is to be applied
by hauling by spreader or irriagtion.
The dam of the WSP will be breached as per closure plan provided by David Clay, PE NRCS-
USDA. After grading is completed, postive drainage will be insured and all disturbed areas are
to be seeded with tall fescue, fertilized, limed, and mulched with the following materials and
amounts:
See attached Seeding Specification Sheet
After grading is complete, the certifying technical specialist will determine the acreage to be
seeded and total amount of material required.
REMOVAL OF INFLOW DEVICES:
All pipes feeding into the waste storage pond willl be removed prior to certification.
DESCRIPTION OF BUFFERS & SETBACKS:
The applicator will be informed of all applicable buffers and setback distances to insure that water
quality and closure procedures are properly followed. The technical specialist on site will review
that closure plan with the applicator and discuss locations of fields to receive waste. Setbacks
and buffer distances are as follows: 25 feet from perenial waters, 100 feet from wells, 200
feet from dwellings not associated with the farm. Waste is to be applied in such a manner
as not to reach property or public right of ways.
Land application of animal waste
The waste liquids will be applied to crop fields in accordance to the facilities existing waste plan.
The sludge will be applied to an adjacent crop field in accordance with the attached nutrient
management plan. Waste is not to be applied while it is raining or when soil conditions are
saturated. Applying waste prior to a predicted rainfall is also to be avoided. The Phosphorus
Loss Assement Tool (PLAT) has been applied to all field receiving waste in the attached plan to
insure that phosphorus is not being overly applied. Since application field is in pasture, soil
erosion is not expected to be a concern.

Stanley Dairy ,Stanley Stikeleather
Waste Storage Pond Closure
August, 2007 SLUDGE
Rusle
PLAT.
Next
RYE Next
Total N
Tract
Field
Acres
Usable
Soil Type
Soil Loss
rating
Last Crop
Crop
Crop
N reg1A
Req
am
m r
8473
S1
6
5
Cecil
4.8t/ac/yr
30
Silage
Silage
- 10.8 tons
120
600
Estimate
d Gals in
Total N in
Total P in
_
NlAcie to 6e -
P/Acre to
Sludge
Ibs N! Gal
Ibs P/gal
WSP
WSP Ibs
WSP lbs)
Arces
a lied _ °= ' .
be applied
0. 221
0.0062
128,371
269.58
795.90
5.00
er. •rt= _LL 53.92
159.18
***Liquid waste will be applied to other crop fields according to the Facility's existing Waste Utilization Plan.
The field listed above is in the existing WUP on file in the Iredell SWCD office.

* Dwisson'Ia Water Quality
2 0 Divlsion of Soil and Water Conservat on-,,
r�`Other ;gency
Fatuity Numtier,�.
Type of Visit r Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 10:30 Departure Time: I �t�D`. County: _—t— RegionARX
Farm Name: s LAf� LA
_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Sh e'� L 6_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: _ Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Sack -up Certification Number: _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e Longitude: = e = s = is
Design Current Design Current
Swine'; : Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population''
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
Type of Visit r Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 10:30 Departure Time: I �t�D`. County: _—t— RegionARX
Farm Name: s LAf� LA
_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Sh e'� L 6_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: _ Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Sack -up Certification Number: _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e Longitude: = e = s = is
Design Current Design Current
Swine'; : Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population''
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Puults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle ' Capacity" Population
Mbairy Co
I :?
0—
Calf
3t7
jairy
airy Heifei
40
jo,
Dry Cow
0
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
ElBeef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes -�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �9A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No - lA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NE
❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �aro ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? [I Yes ElNo ❑ NE
Structuri 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): :Zfl 0.7
Observed Freeboard (in): 1__(21"
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o El NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes hfo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes &o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pond ing ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ FAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence oof� Wind D�,riifll j ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) . cs:zll � � �-3M "y 1 G 1 O ✓<w/ evy
13. Soil types)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes Rio
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination!
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes o
El
❑ NA
❑ NE
�c > �1 72
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

• Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
i
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, c k ❑ Yes "�'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropiiate box, p aebeQklists esign CrapsOther
21. Does record keeping need impr vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 6) ❑ NA ❑ NE
UW-a-ste Applicati Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis Soil Analysis CrWaste Transfers ff Annual Certification
ainfall [;,StO'c_kiug ❑ p Yield ❑4h2B9i_nute Inspections onthly and i" Rain Inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems,, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes �E o ❑"NJA El NE
❑ Yes [INo E ❑ NE
❑ Yes _�Ivo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
*A
❑ NE
❑ Yes"A'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(:]Yes ❑ No' -'RNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes %LNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes *
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes kNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[I NA El NE
��fo
❑ Yes `t'J No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Commerits.'and/or Drawings h :' ..y,. v.:_:.af ^�hF::.M , r :k- , t� �,:, `� .� 1:. ARc. :..s: "a~ to .ti '"
-1 �Q� j � ci'`-7 � S C-•L� C � Vy � �� � ���� d� C � C� t�Q!
K4k-ge>r clos y e to �2
VA
12128104

s
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490021 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490021 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: ¢8/2�(2007 Entry Time:02:OO PM Exit Time: 04:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: ,Stanley Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Stanley T SUkeleather Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 159 Nottingham Cir___ Statesyille NC 286258287
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°47'31" Longitude: 80"48'08"
From the intersection of Hwy. 70E and Bell Farm Rd. (SR 2316), travel north approximately 3 mi. on Bell Farm Rd. Farm is on the right
side of road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Stanley T Stikeleather Operator Certification Number: 21961
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Stanley T. Stikeleather Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Stanley T. Stikeleather Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: �31�aa7
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/01/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.9 LbsI1000 Gallons
12/19/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
05/24/06 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Slikelealher Facility Number: 490021 It
Inspection Date: 08/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
30
0
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
40
0
Cattie - Dry Caw
40
0
Q Cattle - Milk Cow
250
0
Total Design Capacity: 360
Total SSLW: 456,500
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 30,00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather Facility Number: 490021
Inspection Date: 08/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
❑
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
n
■
fl
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
Q
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is.storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
Cl
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
[I
■
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
n
C)
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? 0
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather
Facility Number. 490021
Inspection Date: C8/2312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cam (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ Cl ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ ❑ n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? fl ■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ n 0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ Cl n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ n ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather Facility Number: 490021
Inspection Date: 08/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
CheckSists? n
Design? n
Maps? ❑
Other? Cl
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ Cl n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
11
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
Cl
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
n
■
11
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
n
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather Facility Number: 490021 c
Inspection Date: 08/23/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine ,
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
i
❑■❑n
n ■ ❑ ❑
n ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

i
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490021„ _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490021 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: 1 gutine _ _ _ County: Iredell _ Region:
Date of Visit: 11/21/2006 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02 30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: ,janiev Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Stan,(gy T Stikeleather _
Phone: 704-M-7248
Mailing Address: 1�9_Noltinaham Cir - Statesvilfe NQ RQQ25D287
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°47'31" Longitude: 80�48'08"
From the intersection of Hwy. 70E and Beil Farm Rd. (SR 2316), travel north approximately 3 mi. on Bell Farm Rd. Farm is on the right
side of road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Stanley T Stikeleather Operator Certification Number: 21961
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Stanley T. Stikeleather . Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Stanley T. Stikeleather Phone: [phone]
Primary inspector: James Bealle..,,,� Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: ).'ST
Secondary Inspector(s).
inspection Summary:
05/09/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.4 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/13/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/25/06 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly.
24. Catibration of waste application equipment scheduled in December, 2006,
E.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather
Inspection Date: 11/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
4
Facility Number: 490021
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 250 121
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond WSP 30.00 32.00
Page:2

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather Facility Number: 490021
Inspection Date: 11/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ Cl n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field ❑
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past'discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
f�
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
0
n
n
6. Do any of the structures Pack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
00
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Ap li}� cation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
rl
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Cl
■
00
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Slikeleather
Facility Number : 490021
Inspection pate: 11121/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
fl
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crap T pe 1
Corn (Silage)
Y
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
(Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated, in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n ■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Cl ■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WDP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather Facility Number: 490021
Inspection Data: 11/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Design? n
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ ❑ D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPOES only)?
n
CEO
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?,
■
n
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
r1
■
❑
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Cl
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490021 Owner - Facility: Stanley T Stikeleather
Inspection Date: 11/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490021
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0
■ U
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
n
■ n
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
■ n
n
Page: 6
I

OF W A r�R Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r
� Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 10, 2004
Stanley Stikeleather
Stanley Dairy
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490021
Stanley Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
To correct the facility's animal capacity and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are
hereby forwarding to you this corrected Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Stanley Stikeleather,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application
system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Stanley Dairy, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 250 Dairy Cows, 30 Calves, 40 Heifers, 40 Dry Cows, and the application to
land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void the
COC dated October 1, 2004, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is .a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keep
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
None
rthCarolina
Naturally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2729 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or Iimitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office.
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
U
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
CNMooresville Regional Ofiice,Aquifer Protection Section
I'redell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490021
APS Central Files

A T �9QG
UJ �
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
moor �t4
p� North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`any
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Di✓, 9 2004
ra��1T_
1A NAIURAL RES(ND
(�t8 gC1; 2004
Stanley Stikeleather Its gV1LL1ERSQI�A
Stanley Dairy
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28625
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490021
Stanley Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 24, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Stanley
Stikeleather, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490021 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Stanley Dairy, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 360 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record_keepin>;
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NofthCarolina
Phone; 919-733-3221 1 FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us ����yr����/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper L ii��

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
U K.
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490021
APS Central Files

Type of Visit ACompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit V Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrivai Time: i Departure Time: County: (/ Region:
Farm Name: W _ &,ny Owner Email:
Owner Name: 5kwe—f�: i 1P�7761J� Phone:
Mailing Address: el /11441.24AyM
1 ._T
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �.+6rC,�J�/ ` Integrator: r
Certified Operator: kie- Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ e = 6 = Longitude: 0 ° [� l =
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I __j
I I: 10 Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Nan -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
Ubairy Cow
d
Dair Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes I
El NA
El NE
❑ Yes -
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

• Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?: e5
Designed Freeboard (in): q
Observed Freeboard (in): ti
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
�(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X
No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
I l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Croptype(s) �RN�S�I>AA�SMA11 kA." 6.111bb
�� Cr, _
Ocs" SDjr bps -
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ElYes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
4?.70--Q4 1-0"S
N3.,q jj 2L.1%
3 - It- US r.a _ )l— a 4
01.6 ,.., ,7-' b a'_
Reviewer/Ins ector Name; i Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: r
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes "$No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
XNA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes $fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
)UNA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 18:No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes aQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes IdNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and//or Drawings: ..'.,�
! • ,.:_ j� /�
Q�l k n CO4oI P'r W P �11fibs/ AWte sww— io Iuo-rsy Ow I�t1ACN �✓��en+� r�S
C,'44J AS1 • '
5; Pet..js 44 Av4koo .4' 1-01cU yejw .�> 04� e-'OfuMI'j
l*k ',�� OµLR ��!!/11r�i�.+ p�IyliCq'(.yw+ (/iI.W�Qe..i /N Syw►e 1�e.a'a�s .
12128104

(Type of Visit P-Compliance Inspection. O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted 13 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Ab v_e rThreshold:
Farm Name: ........................ r�?A.I C. ...........LAC Da. County: ..��'`��l�h�...................... ....................
y �
OwnerName: ....................................... ; ..... . ... .............................................. ......................... Phone No; ... _..................................................................................
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:...... ✓�.��./'e /..........
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry drCattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 6 " Longitude • 6 «
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes hlo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KN0
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [j Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes i No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes .91No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes 45 No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes A No
1 I . Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes R No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type //
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWW)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
IQ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
J,No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
4 }Wo
Odor Issues
17.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
EkNo
I9.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? r
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 25No
❑ Yes ULNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes �j No
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes pgNo
❑ Yes (VI No
❑ Yes (d No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

�(A WAr�RQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
'0 G William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
co r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
� y Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
p `C Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Duality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 29, 2003
Mr. Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Cir.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Stanley Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490021
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 28,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone],
Sincerely,
D. Rex GIeason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
S;A
NCDENR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 877-623-6748 FAX [phone]

�L
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 10/28/2003 Tirne: L�
Facility Number 49 21
tO Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: SUDICY.D.&Y .........
County: Lredell................................................ iY.{ Q...........
Owner Name: S.tanley.................................... SUcluth:er............................................... Phone No:(7.A4j.S.7.2.:.72.48..Qr..d8.9!)......................................
Mailing Address: 15.9.NAttiatgtMM..Cir.cie..................................................................... StAtesxille.N.C....................................................... ZA615 .............
FaciiitvContact: ................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: STANLEY.S11MIA"TIMR.......................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Sitaialeyj.............................. S.tikeleathcr ................................... Operator Certification Number:119fij.............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy. 70E and Bell Farm Rd. (SR 2316), travel north approximately 3 mi. on Bell Farm Rd. Farm is
on the right side of road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry N Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 47 31 Longitude F 80
:> Swine
,F
t�
.Design' rCurrent,J.d? '"° . Design -. Current Design Y: 3Curient "
r_>.. Capacity Population .: Poultry -• Capacity population Cattle. Ca aci --Pa ulation"j%,
❑ We to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer
® Dairy
360
120
❑ Non -Layer
1
<
❑ Non -Dairy
R
❑ Other
=
Total Design C_ apacity ,
360
•
za k +
Y'a t ' 7 r 10ta1 A71JL.f
504,00V
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State`? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
NN'aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................. ................................... ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 36

VJ/VJ/V 1
Facility Number: 49-21 Date of Inspection 10/28/2003
f
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Rec_ords_& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
Cl Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iei WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Cl Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
C3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
r a a fin, l,�orut=wy+ -w� wsrat.�rra rwq ^mot- -� o a r wrcrrm�naa�rcray�a�att•� +rriw�paau
Coln I ens refer qu i+'{I�Q ; 'E lai IV ES: •lour;any recot�un�er a tipns 4 yaw
rx. ��
puns
Use dr Q gr Bitua�l ns use additianaltpage�as
Notes
❑ Field Copy
❑ Final
--STORAGE PONDS NEEDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE (MOWING).
--NEED TO LOCATE THE CERTIFIED FARM PLAN FORM.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan `Johson`." _c;aw.-'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ' G , �� Date:
) �- 7 =�}

el
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ext 112
7-22-03
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Sir,
Please complete the attached request form for Stream Classification information for
Stanley Dairy on Fourth Creek in iredell County. This information is needed as part of
the General Permit for an Expanding Animal Waste Operation. This is an existing dairy,
increasing its cattle numbers.
USGS maps are enclosed with farms located.
Please complete and return to me. A mailing label is enclosed.
Thanks,
r N
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr. Environment Specialist
�C DEPT. OF ET�V1R�N1+�$ �,
AKD NATURAL RESOURCE'!
SVILLF 17�:GIQNAL QFFH%-
JUL 2 3 2003
WATER QUAUTY SECTO

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish -to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or Iimitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Pem* AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490021
NDPU Files v NCDEPT, OF ENVRQPII��
' AND NATURKL 4ESMIRCM .
ES11tLt.E.F(s�A�
A
.t
y
` MAY 19 2003E
f.;
STE
R WALI k 12CTI

OF W A 7- 9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
yNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j [ Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
~ Division of Water Quality
t7 'C
May 1, 2003
Stanley Stikeleather
Stanley Dairy
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490021
Stanley Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle -Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 24, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Stanley
Stikeleather, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490021 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Stanley Dairy, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 135 Dairy, 35 Dry, 30 Heifer, 30 Calf cattle and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information- must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
NM
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet http:lm2o.enr.state.no.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Stanley Dairy
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Knottingham fit.- t? Lcit-
Statesville, NC 286r'- 5
704-872-7248
11-21-2000
This plan has been developed by:
C Lipe Barrier, Jr.
DSWC
tredell SWCD
201 Water Street
Statesville, NC 28677
704-87,E-6761
Developfif Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
i
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
/'2 / � .2-va a
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: A/-
U
Technical Specialist Signature Date
__._._............-............... _.................. _.............. ..._...._._........ ..... __._.............. _._....__.......... .... ............ .... - ._._..._.... -.........._._......._..._._
121378 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-22-2000 Cover Page 1

M
r
1:14 DEPARTMOT OF AGRICULTURE
;OIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
NC-CPA-1
Rev. 11-91
Pull
umber and
res if Irrigated
Fare Boundary
Tract
8473
Field or Land Use Boundary .
Field Acrmago. 12g Ac.
1
2.5
Cropland
field Number
IA
5.5
Dairy Lounging area
2
6.2
Cropland
Private geed . am — •• Sawr.
2.1
8.2
Cropland — irrigated
Nbl is Read
2.2
8.2
Cropland — Irrigated
Buildings, houses . ■ esi
3
7.2
Cropland
Poronnial Stream
3.3
5.8
Cropland — Irrigated
3.4A
1.5
Cropland — Irrigated
Intermlitenl Stream
3.4B
1.5
Cropland — Irrigated
Yogetativa >roterway G- f r
3 AC
3.2
Cropland — Irrigated
3.5A
1.7
Cropland — Irrigated
txISTiNG PLANN1A
3.5B
3.6
Cropland — Irrigated
4
8.0
Pastureland
Fence 0
e lhen existing fence are toebiaed milk other
5
3.3
Pastureland
syaboI s. they may be shoos as to Ion:
6
6.7
pastureland
Foace along both aide
of rood -
7
2.0
Hay land
Frame along one 'Ida
at di lch
reneo to be remand.
Ditcb to be removed
Tract
314
Terrace, 6. T-I T-z
Diversionas p-z —�
1
2.5
Hay land
eeThe dots repralsol blocks; the arras
represenl spills
Drainage ditch.
Tract
1
(open draiej
I
File Drain
1
1.0
Hay land
Dam and Reservoir. [
2
7.0
Cropland
_T
Field Border. —.—.— _—•--•--
Firebreak . —F--F—--F--F--
Tract
2
�r�
Spring and Trough. r
1
4.5
Cropland
Ercalagoon. Nalding Pit,
on '
Mt I
Structure' •• �r/�
S
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

��g

1
Narrative
The Nutrient Management Plan was orginally completed in 1997 and is updated to incooperate a new
irrigation plan.
Animal Waste from confinement areas far 135 dairy cows, 35 dry cows, 30 heilfers and 30 calves are
ultilized in this plan. Dairy and Dry Cow confinement waste is stored in a Waste Storage Pond as a Slurry
and spread by irrigation. The Heilfer and Calf confinement waste are handled as solids by collecting from
sheds, watering and feeding areas and spread broadcast on non irrigated field areas. Sufficient land is
available to adquately spread all animal waste generated on this farm. Poultry houses on this farm are used
for farm storage.
Please refer to the included irrigation plan by Ora -Mac Distributing Co. for waste irrigation application
information.
All waste spreading and waste irrigation will be recorded as support information for future planning for
waste utiliation as well as future agency reviews. Forms are including in this folder for recording
spreading and irrigation.
There is not sufficient N produced from the animal waste to meet all the crop and forage needs. Additional
fertilization will be needed. Soil test and waste sample test results will be required to balance out the
additional nutrient needs of the crops being grown. ,
The N will be utilized by growing Corn for silage and Small Grain for silage on the cropland fields and
forage on Tall fesuce pasture and hayland. The planting window for com will be 4/1- 4/30 and small grain
10115-11115. Cropland will be no4illed for all crops.
All needed cropland, hayland, and pastureland practices are established.
Results from waste sample testing for the past three years show an average of 4.4 lbs of N per 1000 gal. of
waste slurry and 3.9 lbs. of N per ton of waste solids. These quantities sampled include rain water
collected from concrete areas and saturating outside solids.
Field soil test show an improvement over the last three years, with the currant year report showing all the
sampled fields with excellent ph and nutrient levels.
Preview Database Version I.a Date Printed: 12-11-2000 Narrative Page 1

f �T
Support Information for User Defined Sources
The dairy animals on this farm are not totally confined. Adjustments are needed to come up with a reliable
amount of waste material to be spread and to combine all sources of dairy waste handled as a slurry, as
well as sources handled dry.
U8 Dairy Mills and Dry Slurry
The following calutations define the Dairy waste slurry produced per head, stored in the waste storage
pond and irrigated on to cropland.
135 Dairy milk cows confined 80% of the time producing 7749 gal./head/year of waste = 836892 gal./year
35 Dairy dry cows confined 10% of the time producing 7749 gal./head/year of waste = 27122.5 gal. /year
Dairy milk cows with 836892 gal./year + Dairy dry cows with 27122.5 gal./year = 864013.5 gal./ year
U9 Dairy Heilfer and Calf Solids
The following calutations define the Dry Dairy Waste produced per head and collected from sheds,
waterers and feeding areas field spreading on non irrigated areas
30 Dairy heilfers confined 35% of the time producing 12 tons/head/year of waste =126 tons/year
30 Dairy calves confined 75% of the time producing 4.1 tons/head/year of waste = 92.4 tons/year
Dairy hear with 126 ton/year + Dairy calves wth 92.4 ton/year = 218.4 tons total dry waste/year.
Prcview Database Version 1.0 Date Printed: 12-08-2000 Narrative Page 2

f
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U9
Dairy Heilfer and Calf Solids waste generated 218.40 tons/year by a 60
animal Dairy Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
939
Incorporated
1245
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
12665
U8
Dairy Milk and Dry Slurry waste generated 864,013 gals/year by a 170
animal Dairy Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste stora a ca acities of approximate! 270 da s.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
8558
Incorporated
11670
Injected
13226
Irrigated
7780
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
10864
Notes:
In source ID, S means standard source, U means. user defined source.
The following minimum criteria must be met in order for a plan to use a User Defined Source to determine
the total pounds of PAN in lieu of NRCS Standards:
L Recommended standard procedures for collecting the waste samples to be analyzed must be followed
2. The samples must be analyzed either at the NCDA Waste Analysis Laboratory or at a private lab. The
analysis reports must be available.
3. Records of annual volumes of lagoon liquid applied must be available.
4. , A minimum of 3 years of records of both nutrient concentrations and annual liquid volumes must be used
to determine the farm averages. A minimum of three samples (one per quarter with seasonal variation) _
must be collected annually for analysis. For dairys with waste storage ponds, the minimum annual sample
number is two.
5. Extreme sample analysis values should not be used to determine the averages. From the standards
121378 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-22-2000 Source Page 1

database Fused on 1,403 data points, one statistical standard deviation from the mean deviates 48% for
swine lagoon liquid nitrogen. Therefore, any value used to calculate the 3-year farm average N
concentration that lies outside of the range of the mean + or - 48% should not_ be used to calculate the farm
average.
If, at a minimum, these criteria have been met for the most recent 3-year period, then the waste utilization
plan may be revised indicating a change in the total PAN on the farm as determined from site specific data.
...._._.............._._._._..._.......... --............ ...._._._............_._._......... ..._.._._._._.................................. ..... ............... _._..._......... --------.._...._.._._._...._........._._._......... .........-._...._......--..........
121378 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed; 11-22-2000 Source Page 2

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied an each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility,
the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning
period -
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to
balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal
waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year I
Tract
Field
sauce
I.R.
Soil Series
TOW
Acre
Use
Acres
RYE
RYE
Unit
AppliQ
Period
NIIiogm
PA
Nutrica
Raga
I N
Came.
Fart.
Nutrient
Applied
N
Reg
OWA)
N
Applia
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrierd
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(aQe)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(awe)
Liquid
Minnie
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Mmme
Applied
(Field)
ihs/A
1000
I/A
tans
1000 gals
tau
--0001
1
U9
liog
1.0
1.0
escsre flay
4.8
Tans
8/1-751
212
0
0
Broad
212
0.0
49.3
0.0
49.3
--41001
2
U9
Appfiag
7.0
7.0
call Crrabt, Silage
10.2
Tau
9115-3/31
114
0
0
Broad
114
0.0
26.5
0.0
195.6
-41D01
2
U9
7.0
7.0
Silago
22.3
Tau
2/l5-"O
243
0
0
Broad
243
0.0
56.5
0.0
395.6
0002
1
U9
Appling
4.5
4.3
ben Gra' Silo
10.2
Tans
9/ 15-3/31
114
0
0
Broad
114
0.0
26.5
0.0
119.3
0002
1
U9
Lin
4.5
4.5
Si
22.3
Tars
2/1Sfi/30
243
0
0
Broad
243
0.0
56.5
0.0
254.3
--4314
1
U9
lin
2.5
2.5
naive Ha
4.9
Tais
8/1-7/31
U7
0
0
Broad.
217
0.0
50.5
0.0
126.2
9473
1
U9
CECIL
2.5
2.5
mall Grain. Silo
9.8
Tau
9/15-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.0
25.4
0.0
63.4
8473
1
U9
CECIL
2.5
2.5
Silage20.5
Tans
2115-6/30
223
0
0
Broad
223
0.0
51.9
0.0
129.6
8473
2
U9
CECIL
6.2
6.2
mall lira' Silage
9.8
Tons
9/15-3/31
i 109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.0
25.4
0.01
157.2
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-01-2000 WUT Page 1
-1

Waste Utilization Table
Year i
Tract
Field
Source
I.D. I
Soil Series
d
Taal
Acm
USe.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit I
Applies
Period
Nit D&m
PA
Nu em
Req'd
fibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fart..
Natriart
ApphW
tlbs/A)
N I
Res,
(Ihs/A)
N
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Mama
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(sac)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Ibs/A
1000
PAVA
tons
ID00 PAIS
tans
8473
2
U9
CECIL
6.2
6.2 lCom
Silage
20.5
Tans
2/151/30
223
0
0
Broad
223
0.0
51.9
0.0
321.5
8473
2.1
U8
CECIL
8.2
9.2
11 Grain, Silage9.8
Tans
9/15-3/31
109
0
0
Irri
109
12.1
0.0
98.8
0.0
8473
2.1
U8
CECIL
8.2
8.2
Silo
20.5
Tans
2/15-6/30
223
0
0
Irri
223
24.8
0.0
202.1
0.0
8473
2.2
US
CECIL
8.2
8.2
mall Grain, Silage9.8
Taos
9115-3/31
109
0
0
Irri
i09
12.1
0.0
98.8
0.0
8473
2.2
U8
CECIL
8.2
8.2
Silo
20.5
Taos
2115-6/30
223
0
0
Irri
223
24.9
0.0
202.1
0.0
8473
3
U9
CECIL
7.2
7.2
mall Gram, Silage9.4
Tons
9/15-3/31
104
D
0
Broad.
104
0.0
24.2
0.0
174.1
8473
3
U9
CECIL
7.2
7.2
Silage19.5
Taos
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad
213
0.0
49.5
0.0
356 6
8473
3.3
U8
CECIL
5.8
5.9
ma11 Grain, Silage11.0
Tans
9115-3131
122
0
0
Irri
122
13.5
0.0
79.0
0.0
8473
3.3
U8
CECIL
5.8
5.9
Sila
23.0
Tans
2/13.6/30
251
0
0
Irri
251
27.9
0.0
162.5
0.0
8473
MA
U8
CECIL
1.5
I.5
mall Grain, Silage9.4
Toes
9/15-3/31
104
0
0
lrri
104
11.6
0.0
17.0
0.0
8473
MA
US
CECIL
1.5
1.5
Silage19.5
Taos
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irri
213
23.7
0.0
34.8
0.0
8473
3.4B
U8
CECIL
1.5
L5
mall Grain, Silage9.4
Toes
9/15-3/31
104
0
0
Irri
164
11.6
0.0
16.7
0.0
8473
3.4B
U8
CECIL
1.5
L5
Silage
19.3
Taus
2115-6/30
213
01
0
[nip,213
23.7
0.0
34.3
0.0
8473
3.4C
US
CECIL
3.2
3.2
U Grain, Silage
9.4
1 Tons
9/15-3/31
104
01
0
Irri
104
11.6
0.01
37.1
0.0
8473
3.4C
US
I CECIL
3.2
3.2
JDOM Silage
19.5
Tons
VIS-6/30
213
01
0
hrix
213
23.7
0.0
75.9
0.0
8473
3.5A
U8
I CECIL
1.7
1.7
Pmall Grain, Silair
9.4
Tens
9115-3/31
104
of
0
fiTi&
104
11.6
0.0
19.2
0.0
8473
3.5A
U8
CECIL
1,7
1.7reMSilage
19.5
Taal
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
irri
213
23.7
0.0
39.3
0.0
8473
3.513
US
CECIL
1.6
3.6
Gram, Silage9.8
Tans
9/15-3/31
109
0
0
Irri
109
12.1
0.0
43.2
0.0
8473
3.513
US
CECIL
3.6
3.6Sila
20.5
Tans
2/15-6/30
223
0
0
Ini
223
24.8
0.0
88.4
0.0
8473
4
U9
CECIL
6.5
6.5
Pasture
3.8
Tans
8/1-7/31
128
0
0
Broad
128
0.0
29.8
0.0
193.5
8473
5
U9
CECIL
3.3
3.3
Pasture
4.0
Tans
9/1-7/31
133
0
0
BM-i
133
0.0
30.9
0.0
tQ2.1
8473
6
U9
CECIL
6.7
6.0Padme
4.0
Tars
9/1-7131
133
0
0
Broad
133
0.0
30.9
0.0
207.2
8473
71
U9
I CECIL
2.01
2.0
[Fescue Hay
4.4
Tans
9/1-7131
198
0
Road.
198
0.0
46.0
0.0
92.1
.01
Lagoon Ligtlids
Total li 1000 Omens
1.249
Tata1 Produced, 1000 Sallons
964
Enlan 10D0 lane
-385
14 MUFe Solids
Talai hai.,tans
2,928
Total Produced, tam
219
Ba tons
- 709
Notes: 1. In the trod column, Symbol - mama leased, otherwise, awned 2. Symbol' means user arirred data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-01-2000 WUT Page 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration
rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate
that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be
applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that
each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Trad
Field
Soil saia
Aw ica im Rita
incbea/haar
ApplicKicn Am =
8473
11
CECIL
0.60
8473
2.2
CECIL
0.38
8473
3.3
CECIL
8473
3.4A
CECIL
0.
8473
3.4B
CECIL
8473
3.4C
CECIL
0.38
0.60
8473
3.3A
CECIL
0, J81
8473
3.3B
CECIL
864521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printod: 11-27-2000 IAF Page 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crap in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,
this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available
storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume
of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste
utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Dairy Milk and Dry Slurry
R!!!M StoEge Capacity (Days)
Start Date
4/1
270
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage (Days) *.
1
1
132
1
2
104
1
3
73
1
4
270
1
5
239
1
6
209
1
7
178
1
8
147
1
9
270
1
10
239
1
11
209
I 1
12
178
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
121378 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-22-2000 Capacity rage 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff; drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is.prohibited.
Z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance]
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
121378 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-22-2000 Specification Page 1

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a�swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
12I378 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed. 11-22-2000 Specification Page 2

f
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
121378 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-22-2000 Specification Page 3

metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
_._._....._.... - ._._ _..................... ..._.................. ................... .........._._._._..............._._._._..........------------- -........_----------.......-----._._._............_._.-._._..-----.....---._._......._.
121378 Database Vernon 1.06 Date Printed: 11-22-2000 Specification Page 4

A

IRRIGATION LAYOUT
Tract 8473
1 �
1
1 +
1
11 1
------—'----------—..--..—_--- .y------•
F IELD �2 `
' s4
t `
� i 1
I
l;
1 ; 1
.1=1
i
� 1
1 `
1
'
1 1
� 1
� 1
- -- - - - - - - -
-
-- -
- - - - — - - - - - — - - - - - __ +�
------
_
------------LFGOM
1 �
1 STD
s � 1
1 PULL +---_ .
1 4%
srj ; 160,SE
11 � ♦
— — - 140`
4C
+ 4$
4R ♦♦ �h ;
r;7- L-Lo =.1
PIPE IS S�
" SLR 21 G0 PVC
PIPE If1S'RJAIION CEKH - 36 + 42'
TB ¢ 1'M; T-gLoM-_---- .
Scale 1'=290'
BUFFER
,
1
Stikeleather Dairy
Stanley Stikeleather
1w Notunalam awe
States*i11° NC ZOM
pipe key
+a- FHB y.1ohd PC Pwa
2- IM 94 F%t: Paw
Sprinkler f valve key
ax t9114P,-a gWry p1r,o a./L`ca
��tr Flap Haws G+a raSr
�..,,t • ier bti... ra1N s
'-tat.r 5wp1+ -
Gra—Mac Distrfbuting Co.
2910 NC Hwy. 8M N
Yooksvill% NC W025
phone 910. me 3m
ra: 916-988-=
Dedgned by: Jason Graham
Data: ¢27-w
:Aia%X VX-XI %' I Dest- Na 228
r
I

--tafichaelF'_��ejt�'Goyempt�"".,.
William G. Rowzr_, secretary I
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P r , Director
Division. of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 25, 2002
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Cir.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject:' Stanley Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490021
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility.on October 24,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained; and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional. Supervisor
cc: File
NMEW
a\. C. Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 26115 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]D40

Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 49 21 1),,, of Visit: ]0124/2002 Time:
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.
Farn, Name: Staaley.l?arty........................................................................ County. ........
Owner Name: Stsaley._._.--------_-_--bkcutber-----------------___--- Phone No:
lllailing Address: 1 9.�1Q1t�iAEgltat .lwQUIP ..................................................................... S101rMY11 CAC.......................................................7.805..............
Facility Contact:........................................................—Title:................................. Phone No:
Onsite Representative:Integrator:.-----------_---_--_______----_---
Certified Operator:SlaWcy..T.............................. 511111i la)tote[.................................... Operator Certification Number:2l9fal.-.......... ...............
y •r
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy.'70E and Bell Farm Rd. (SR 2316), travel north approximately 3 mi. Farm is on the right side A'
if road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 47 31 Longitude 80 • 48 08
�,M>,
:Design `iCurreat 9 'Y: Designs,: -'Current_ Deslga ;Cturent:`..
,Swine. Canaelty>Pnnulatianaa.?oultl'y_. ,Capacity :Ponulatinn'.z":Cattle - . (!anacltv'`pnmifatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1
1L-1-Layer . I... - 129 Dairy --1 230 1 I30
❑ Non -Layer _ ❑ Non -Dairy
*- ❑ Other � .� �F - �, M .�
} otaliD230 F
Subsurface Drains Present JJLJ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System a,99l'` "
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
«'ante Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................... ............. .......... .. -
Freeboard (inches): 6
RCIA2 /A Y r'....H....,.,i

u�i u.:a vi
)Facility Number: 49-21
Date of Inspection 10/24C1002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
❑ Yes N'No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? '❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Com (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated -in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes .® No
14..a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving.crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
'® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
[] .No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
-
-
�U e r ans: iii age& inecsa;„ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
ACII.TIY AND RECORDS APPEAR TO BE IN GOOD SHAPE.
-
.�' ^v1"b'V�: r�cMPrt.. i - —.L ^'S/ T'. �`r•r3 '�� r �
-
Reviewer/Ins ector Name t 4 n
A)LAN;JOHNSON
p H,,,,. �'•': .r-*- A !'.-ram .r3r n! 5. ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,z—r Date:

o��F W A rE9Qr,
r
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject:
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Stanley Dairy, Facility #: 49-21
Iredell County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm -Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at (704) 663-I699.
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson /
Environmental Specialist II
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 600 623-7748 FAX [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July H, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Stanley Stikeleather
Stanley Dairy
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28625
Farm Number: 49 - 21
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
I T T •WA •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Stanley Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage under an
Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) dos to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely, �.
�r
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File,(w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10%4 post -consumer paper

WArE
/AJ
`O�� 94fi Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 17, 2001
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Cir.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Stanley Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490021
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 16,
2001. Based on his observation made during the inspection, the facility appeared to be well
maintained; and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection reports, which
should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
"'A
NCDENrR
:ustomer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
800 623.7748 FAX [phone]

Type of Visit (,compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ABoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: `'`7""7'-� Time:
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Wermitted ❑ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:...........„.
Farm Name: .rL%..IY� �_::! tr.... County:..........--�'................... ............. „........
^ ..
Owner Name: ........................ l.f Phone No: ......
Facility Contact: ....................................................�..---........../..........Title: j Phone No
Mailing Address: . % ........ ........5.......... ....... „....:...rn�`
Onsite Representative:.......,,zr .1 �f�..... Integrator : ................................ „................ „...................................
e�
Certified Operator: ......;, vrlCt �$�) �; cG----- Operator Certification Number:._,.,,,,„ ..............................
Location of Farm: ((
FN
❑ Swine - ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �• ��� Longitude �• ��
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer f.Dairy C'3 13
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer El Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLw
Number of Lagoons :; :'" ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
-Holding Ponds/SolidTraps " No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges - Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes t,No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 4!lNo
01 /0l /0l Continued

Facility Number. — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ YesL
Structure 1� Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _............... .... _...... ......... ............ .......... ........ ............... ..................... ............. . __ ................... ........_._.._.........._.
Freeboard(inches) ............ ............ _....._..........._........... ... ........ ... .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to theintegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [2,No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 29.No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes E!�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ff No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate; gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes RLNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 5&No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [:]Yes JZNo
12. Crop type'/rz���'+ .. ,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated fn the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑`No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®,No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes Q No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes -.No
17.
Are rock outc resent? -
❑ Yes ❑ No
18.
Is there a water suppwell within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes tNo
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes 4K No
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes E�,No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ETNo
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes allo
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑-Yes E],No
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes -C No
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes Z No
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes .,C No
Odor Issues
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ,LNo
01/01/01
Continued

Facility Number- Date of Inspection
Printed on. 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent,/temporary cover?
E] Yes [3 No
E]Yes 'D No
C] Yes Z)
El Yes Z+4o
[-] Yes E] No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
"ji
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
01/01/01

r.�.
rTNCDENR
JAMES B.'HUNT JR.'.
' GOVERNOR
KB1LL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
13 „• - ,
s fi„
2s;
�•'�V _ .1�1.4 '°Myr�:, I'L..,y1J.,11,� e' I '4
AL
'f
-' �' " �~�.'�� �• .k; '"fir
tl-�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 15, 2000
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Cir.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Stanley Dairy Farm, Facility #: 49-21
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on August 10, 2000. Based on his observations made during the inspection the
facility appeared to be well operated and maintained and the files appeared to be
complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / APPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit ;[,Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit jj� Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
r
._....._.._.....�._._,....,._.......,..__z.__._.,_.._.....�._..,..,., Faciiitv Number 1)arV III' Visit: 1'imc: . y Printed mi. 7121/2000
0 Not operational 0 Below Threshold
❑ Permitted WICertified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or :lhnve Threshold: ...................
Farm Name:...........-S.TS�Y�..1.r.............Tir.�.!r.. .. Count}':..........s ..L C�.�1�..........................................
j .....
Owner Name: "'�..� ... ��.ri.. ..1.. ¢.`.1..V��2.'1 Phone No:
FacilityContact ............................................................................... title:............... ..... .. Phone No: ..................................................
Mailing Address: .........� fy.��.dl.-!i.:Lf..F'lGx.��. �1� ...................:7:./...`-Si.'I.11....................�5�.i
L........... / /'I .................
Onsilc Representative: ..;�11�%..L..�'E�ntegrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ...... S, T.: .1-K.................' i.. ..� .. ...........P�s1Operator Certification Number: 5(0� ...............
-,L.rreution of Farm:
J
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry
attle ❑ Horse Latitude ' Longitude • ` '&
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver �Dairy f
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Nun -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JCI Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagmm Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste klanagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes t No
Discharge uriginated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If :iischarge is observed, was the convevancc man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If dischars*e is observed. did it reach Water of the State.) (If yes, norify DWQ)
c. II'discharLc is observed. what is the estimated flow in Ual/inin"
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes iMNo
«'aste Collection & 'treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes QNNo
SVULAtrrc 1 Su-u41urc 2 Strucuirc ; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................
Freehnard (inches): T-q
5100 Continued on back

FacWty Number: — Date of io.rpcctitrar � Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? fie/ trees. severe erosion•
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly address::d and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ~
Watilc_ Xpplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
11
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination:}
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Record.5 & Document~
17, Fail to have Certifleate of Coverage & General Pcrmit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps. etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time ordesign?
21. Did the Facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additionsi problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
violations;o;r• deficiencies *(t re potted diiring ;ftiis:visit; - Yoii ;will receive fie; further, - ; - ; •
corres�oridence. abouti this :visit. :: ; ; :::: ; ; :: ; : ; :::: ....;
❑ Yes );�No
❑ Yes (� No
;VYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 13No
❑ Yes PtNo
❑ Yes G�No
❑ Yes j2j-No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes J�o
❑ Yes 71,
❑ Yes t No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes Flo
❑ Yes 2T-Mo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0-No
❑ Yes ;9.No
❑ Yes ff o
❑ Yes dvo
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
A5 re �C+ret�.� bL hc�Q e__ 6 t-e►n 0,3tnk `ti C S , rl c 1 can `
5�eecS.W k-k Q 9-CLSs . Go- ',VIV,-EA
4 sAI,41 '�v•ee.5. is
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;
ReviewerfInspector Signature: �� ���., � � Date: A5) —e 5100

• Facility Number: — Date of lu,pection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor lti:5l1CS
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �,. to
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes =IsJo
roads, building structure. and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes `�No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes,';JNo
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or rawings:
Aw
5100

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Stanley Stikeleather
Stanley Dairy
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28625
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
14.c. n1r.-T. 011
December 30, 1999 WMROWENT, HEALTIV
& NATURAL R1f-S0`1RCR3
'JAN 10 "�
Vzo OF 511iRB;fiAVAt "ANA.UMEYt
IMORESKLE RRID O Of Flrr
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-21
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required io
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of .North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
William E. Holman, Secretary
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
r••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA QEPARTMENr OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NQIJRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October ,13, 1999
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Stanley Dairy, Facility #: 49-21
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted.a site inspection of your facility on October 7,
1999. Generally, the facility was in good shape; however, the fallen -.tree on the storage.pond
needs to be removed or destroyed. In respsonse .to your question on burning the tree where it lies,
Mr. Johnson spoke with Mr. Patrick Grogan in the Land Quality Section of the Division of Land
Resources and was informed that this was acceptable. Be.advised that should the roots of the tree
be located on the storage pond's embankment, they need to be removed in. accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service's standards.
Please note that during many,of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms
are often missing one or more components of the farm plan thayshould be available for review.
The following items must be available for review'by the inspector during the inspection:
Certification forms.
• Site Diagram, which showsfencing, streams, buffer zones,.and feed areas.
.• Waste Application records,, with, accompanying,wasteanalyses. .
• Maps of acreage.and irrigated:felds.
Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number., usable/wettable acres {not necessarily
total acreage), list of crops, PAN, required, .and amount. of waste.produced by
livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan which must be posted.
• Insect, Odor :Control, and Mortality Checklists must'be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, Forth Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

I
Page 2
Failure -to -have .the above components available•and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation -or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications should be made
during the .time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be
applied no earlier than.30 days prior to planting.
If.you have any questions concerning this matter, .please do not•hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
& /"- ), /te-''�
D. Rex Gleason, P. -E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of InspectionNag 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted FCertified [j Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .............. `. ` .. ..................................................... County' .........,. �.\...,.............. .... ,..................
++ f( p�
Owner Name: i .n.�.-C y �.. C t~ 1 if rn v. �... Phone No: - % 7..`. . Z..f r.
FacilityContact ........................... Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ...% 1d..<Ti.hf.Gt.�A.wt....:...�.r....................................-..t...f........,...,.,...,.,........4°.,C..�....
j.� r l f r s
Onsite Representative:....... �..4r5✓L..4n,t........ .., T..c..l .L �e� Integrator: .......................................
Certified Operator:............ .........;� T `t° ............... s t„[� ,� ; e;�/Operator Certification Number:...... .. .�...............
.... I
i
ocation of Farm: I
.........................................................................
Latitude ���' �•' Longitude �• ° 66
Design Current; '
SWIt1Q C'annrity Pnnnlatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to ,Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Number.of,Ugoons JE3 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area y
Holding-Pon_ds�I Solid Traps i ; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [ILagoon ElSpray Field [IOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin'?
❑ Yes 0&0
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon titan'? If c,s notify DW ❑ Yes ❑ No
� Yp" b Y• ( Y ' �� Y Q)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ......... (, .(0...............
Structure 5
❑ Yes & No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ yes IS
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12, Crop type
❑ Yes X No
jYes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 1) No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated fn the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes QNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ANo
b) Does the facility need a_wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit.readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�Vo yiolafi0Is,or• clt�fcien... r..0re Hated cl>Gr W g �bis'visit! ;Y;oO will .00iye f}o: futthgr ;
. - • ' corres• oridence. abQu>k this visit.: •
❑ Yes `�No
❑ Yes KNo
El Yes Ok
❑ Yes ;RNo
❑ Yes �4'No
❑ Yes _1�1 No
El Yes [Wo
❑ Yes j No
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes P No
4 Explain any„YES"Answers andlor'anyrecommendations or any okh'er`comments
Comments (refer to question,# y
iE3se;drawmgs of facility to'b�etter'explatn situations (use additional pages as necessary):,
t A fr W ��e cQ5 2� co, 6 6rc" 5 e-- � Url. �L� K] � vUG ! In � �1 t V�ts�~ �7 � l
rle_vv_O
ReviewerAnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
U10*=11

Facility Num er: — Date of Inspection 0
Odor Issims
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
YVo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
�do
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
I�No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
&�No
30,
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
ANo
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
JR_No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
NNo
A04itionallommen an orDrawings-.,:
3/23/99

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE `
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
Stanley StikeIeather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Site Inspection
Stanley Dairy, Facility #: 49-21
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper'method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his.
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2.8115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMALOYER - 50% RECYCLI10/10% POST-CONSIIM ER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen (Application for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third. (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 401bs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately, equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gaVyr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application. rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely, n '
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
�1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
a NAT 'LAL lRO9t)t'R[!Ite
MAR 5 1998
QN3101m Newark w•rw
Mum t all*
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number L%9 —,:,)l .
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. 1f you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
av1'
f� L�
F 's - llt'4
e� r
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): t &--Y T_ •� Zt �Z1ft�
2. Facility No.: I -
3. Facility Name:
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
S. Mailing Address: rt fvo C
City: r State: Zip: 6'�S
Telephone No.: (.701)7' - 1;: 2a
6. Count), where facility is located:
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle):._ �g y
S. Application Date:
11. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of N iolation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 1 of 4

?. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
FORA? SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which -animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
i
Applicant's Certification:
1. 5 *--14-C-y T_ attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not completed and if all
Gen ral Statutes and Regulations. I under tand that the failure to meet any dates that area reed
upon by myself and the EMC will result in appropriAte enforcement actions being taken by the
Sr .V c 1 L
Print Name of Owner
Date 2
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

H. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules.that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
/-� 14,
Applicant's Certification:
I, Sri 4�attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required arts of this a lication are not completed d all
Print Name of Owner
__101 __ Date !� vZL
SiSi n�, IZ
Owner
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 3 of 4

r
03 f 1AI 17 pv,,r�.✓1,vg qevc "--o- ��~.�.✓
O A) F � ..deT7� S.�►ri d Ca ter
0-011v 9 7
�- lk=�l -0 4407- A4 7--T1CAl'cW
os-/ 9,7
0
4071 /917
091 ,}
16/ /6l qx 7
/C/2/ 19 7
col col 17
v�✓Ty�- CO3T-
S!(ss•�� R�u�� � G� car %
dsw cA) R avc�s
4-0 7v
5,9A%F:Q
44Le-7ah, ,vsu•c /9y�c �� C ;�t�c7*
Ir-,g r q 7
<,14k 470' leeVj&--Z'-'4C--40 Co.v,,s7-t 0
W 1 7-H C.D A-) 7WAe72>jC /97
fwa�7 <_OA)37Ae v C 776 •v a F"
�C 7,C 4t 4-. / /f-74 ✓i' ui z--
F«re-.t AVeyg / ?,- 4,0729 C-AY _
A&74-r- X -�41
ReCt&--Ve27 C/ft?aC FaaC wv

0 J
VQ
�UY
� �a
� 4
I
op

r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 22, 1998
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Stanley Dairy, Facility #. 49-21
Iredell County, NC .
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
September 17, 1998. In general the facility was in good shape. Regarding the dead trees
on your storage pond, before deciding to burn them in place, you should contact your
technical specialist. Also, the acreage in your waste application records must agree with
the useable acres designated in your -waste utilization plan. Finally, you need to check on
your certified operator renewal card. You may contact Ms. Cindy Dudley in the Training
and Certification section at [phone].
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex GI ason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ A FFtRMATI V$ ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
htl1C.::meVfis' -

[j Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
JaDivision of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (lih:mm)
M,Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted j3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.................s5-.-tr.��11.1.e. ....... C�..►r. Count �. �'.•4f .� 1 ...
Owner Name:....:...... flt`. G . 1.� ..i ��,.1.1!� ! .............. Phone No:....................... ..... •.... ..................... I............
Facility Contact:....................................................:...... ............ Title:.................., Phone Na
.....................................................................................................
Mailing Address: �i � 1! ............................. ..... .��.�?......... G�.D..,l.7.i�..�fa.+'ki.....5...:.�.r�.................................�C.-��r.1�„�►.U.I...I.E'.,-....
�: f
Onsite Representative: ....... 5..... �11.4f ............. �-�.�.�.C�....�. .... Integrator:............,..........................................
Certified Operator;......�.'I`i� .�'tjE'............ � r..keJ.+°( P_&P_ ..... Operator Certification Nutuber:.........................
Location of Farm: ((
car......7 d....t~.a. ....... =.. .rn�.�..............T......o ......$ If...... ...R ..... R....... .i.............. ,ram ...............
J
r.......01... �............`cs.►��1............... �L�.........77�i1rY�........... ..............
.........................................................
Latitude ®' 6 K Longitude ®• ®4 ®"
:Design - Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population ., Cattle" � Capacity Population "
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
MIN
X
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number oP Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
x ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? XYes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )�No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? • ❑ Yes ,ANo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes K"'No
7125/97

FacH4 Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes [,`$�No
Structures (Lagoans.11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 000
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier;
Freeboard(tt): ................. k............. ................................................................................ ,..,.......................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes D�No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...............b.if'Y\
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0- No.violations.ot• deficiencies. were, noted,during this:visit.• :You.rvill receive; no,ftirther,
corres'pb»tdepce dboid -this:visit:::....: :.... ::. :.:.
❑ Yes 9 No
Yes ❑ No
XYes �ffNo
❑ Yes MNo
...............................
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 14No
Cl Yes VNo
❑ Yes 7—
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes �LNo
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ,�171 No
❑ Yes J(No
•�wo''fU'S �'vt� ram' r.r �/��`tcle�t,� �, ,1; .�/ ,�t?:, • L'atnn 1��� �{ �e�- �
`Me eew--t��i Carr is v
1 % e AA vv�� � f n// r / j
t�r ✓�+�r ft� fe�e� �eerxs �vu b�� et�eclC dvl Le rt� �� e d
C_C)�_,r+ f
t�se.�b`� a.creQ�� � ���-,e.� c�wl w���-e- °1PpE�ca--�o•� �rw� Sko�.1�
Q 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
. ,
r
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAruRAI.. RESOURCES
July 17, 1998
JUL 920 1998
MI' F
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Stanley Dairy
Facility Number: 49-21
Iredell County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on February 24, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Stanley Stikeleather
in order to allow additional time for Stanley Stikeleather to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return' the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, i urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 571or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
I . ""; �c '01-_'�/
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File -- Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
tDWQ Regioh4al Gf&&D
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-21
STANLEY STIKELEATHER
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Stanley Stileleather, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 14313-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works„but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the Commission
as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143; Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects of
the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a
contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-21
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-21
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Stanley Dairy
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 20,
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Stanley Stikeleather
Stanley Dairy
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28677
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLMA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1998
Mr— DFWT. Or
PoNVIftf)t MIt'..,gT. ICAI TFE
& refkrutt L a suxcea
AUG 24 1998
Alvist-ON 9f i W?'TMT
'UMLE Eimer RAt MICE -
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 49-21
Stanley Dairy
Iredell County
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. if you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, h.,
ATTACHMENTS
cc: MRO Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Central Files
Shannon Langley
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5o% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

` NORTWeA1RO€ANA
ENVIRO �� GEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDEL
is
IN THE MATTER OF
DIV, OF ATER QUALITY
DiREC 'S OFFICE
STANLEY STIKELEATHER
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-21
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Stanley Stikeleather, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with ISA NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the Commission
as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects of
the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a
contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph I (a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-21
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtaiti and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

r'
Farm Number: 49-21
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
S. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified anima]
waste management plan.
For Stanley Dairy
.S M A) L-L- S
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signatu of Owner
For the North Carolina Enviro ntal Management Commission:
1 Date Ir k V4?
Q chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Stanley Stikeleather
Stanley Dairy
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
1 � •
AM
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998 N.C. DEPT. ()p
ENVtRON.Myl'. IIEAI;rm
& NATU AL RCs0UItCg3
FEB 25 1998
1u1HSIXI OF Et14'II!" ltF'li41 11A"C;rdEU
���iS�iitE Rfa �;lAi Off16E
Subject: Request for Status Update .
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Stanley Dairy
Facility Number: 49-21
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to takz appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Conunission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

4tiy�
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this forni if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attu: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised, of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Y
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5 0 % recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
.fames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
January 5, 1998
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Operator -in -Charge Certification
• NCGS 90A-47.2
Stanley Dairy, Facility #: 49-21
IredelI County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
As of January 1, 1998 all facilities must have a certified Operator -In -Charge. A review of
the database does not show this to be the case for your facility. Failure to have a Certified Operator -
in -Charge is a violation of NCGS 90A-47.2.
If you or the designated operator for the facility have not taken and passed the required exam,
an interim certified operator should be obtained. If you have already taken the exam, you may want
to contact Ms. Cindy Dudley of the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification
Commision (WPCSOCC) at 919-733-0026.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E. -
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Main Street, Nil
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Ccrolina 28115 CAn Equat Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper

5
OrI jF%A
,,.,':.WASTE, :UTI:LIZATI_M,'...
ON PLAN
Produce
Location: 159 Knottingham Rd., Statesville, NC 28677
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 135
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure(s): Waste Storage Pond
Application Method(s): Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
You must have the animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content
as close to the time of application as practical and at least within
60 days of the date of application before each application cycle.
Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must be
analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced
for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Lime must be
applied to application fields as recommended by soil test to
maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates,.leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, (see Required Specification No. 4) waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year.
1

��1f.J_r � -'{ � � �J,s`�ly,•t,+c �►,�: `_ .: Y '_ '-.c;�{K�'a�1''r� �tid� t •
r. r. •' '„'1� _ ;`r• •fti "^i . K•,'rt
� � � ► � �-,;;:.ti;,}r�, •. ,,fir l"".
+•s4i'�
J j.�„.�yyv. JJ . �, +j 4 ,t rk mow? �'p J a - � M�...i q T • _ _
fry 'F j . i J l,•• Y +¢. y� f ,,,p���rl++•5���}�`-f ? 5�{r1..y� 5 l S� -i t .) '-•
� `,i" .7..•y� :,jJ ••1 FT
,F r'_. _'�•�,-
'��F?¢j►,'v . #�` a ° Y': ' y.�...i:L "i"y9Q"' i i'
`r 7
IV
F _ '' :,�� '.r'�,.F�l.i;'•'� •'yam � �` r k,!�.., ! �,._,`sv:�, .i Y
MIT
AP
•lam .ram y. .' �r;�;h:•.��i ��°:r � �r•: , '^:>':rT•�..,
�� ,L «� ? '"1 � <; i• - max- r� '► :�,�'J•�.':
/ . ; _aaQ d � `•�'' fir':., � . r ��,
�,� �; '�: •ram•. ,:.•.��s•;. �
�� J�Y }r!^•fiJ��.L,�y.,4 • "/ w'r •p� J ^'f+" w'•'�~. t+-
` V ._ .•+•i� �,�F %.�,.✓r f lx.a �: ' tS �:..:• y `..,r�'T
`.1t=� l�Lr:S� 3. _iY�� �+.rX�f�+'�1$ :r:?"� } •I•�`>r•,�Xanja,..W .� . _ ,• :r .r.

WASTE I U T I L I ZAT N P$LA N:
,: L¢
r
WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are
available for waste application. It will not be necessary and may not
be desirable to apply waste to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual
nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the
potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the
Nitrogen that can be reasonably applied to the crop and used by the
crop in a timely manner using animal waste alone. It will not be
practical -to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with animal
waste. Supplemental applications of commercial fertilizer may be
required during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient
needs. It is assumed that for certain row crops only a fraction of
the total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using animal
waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on
each field on the Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record
Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field
application tables:
CROP
CODE
CROP
I j
1 PRODUCT'N
i UNITS
NITROGEN
REQUIREM'T
LBS./UNIT
CG
CORN - GRAIN
i BUSHELS;
1.13
CS
CORN - SILAGE
I TONS
11.0
HCS
HAY, COOL SEASON, NOT GRAZED
i TONS
45
HGL
HAY, GRASS -LEGUME MIX, NOT GRAZED
TONS
20
HSG
HAY, SMALL GRAIN, NOT GRAZED
TONS 'i
55
PCs
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
16.4
OG
OATS - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS'!
1.15
TB
BURLEY TOBACCO
POUNDS
0.07
WG
WHEAT - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS;
2.05
SG
BARLEY - SILAGE, Dry Content
TONS
55
Woods
Hardwood and Pipe
ACRE
100
8

WASTE ..UTL_LIZA.-FTION.PLAN
Table I: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER Lower
Recommended & 3
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to %e
Tract Fieid Type__ Crop Antici at
No. No.
Code
Code Yield
Irrigated areas
I o,.r-;�•� ��
8473 2
CfB2
? CSC 18
8473 ! 2
1 fall SG 2
8473 3
! CX2
CS i 18
8473 3
i
fall SG 2
Other manure
t
8473 2
CfB2
CS 18
8473 2
CfB2
fall SG 2
8473 3
CfC2
CS ; 18
8473 3
CM2
fall SG 2
8473 1
CfB2
CS 18
8473 1
CfB2
fall SG 2
4314i 1 €
CfB2 I
CS 18
4314 1
CfB2
fi SG 2
1 Acres-L
Required
to be
Useable
Per Ac.
Applied2
18.1
198 i
150
18.1
110
80
16.8
198
150
16.8
acres in fringe
110 80
areas of irrigated fields
4.4
198
150
4.4
j 110
80
7.6
198
150
7.6
110
80
5.5
198
150
5.5
j l I0 1
80
4.3
1 193
150
4.3
110 I
80
TOTALS THIS TABLE ac . 1 17,595 I I..3 '',041.
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus
the required buffer areas which border streams or residential
areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most
likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources
such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
10

WASTE. ::UTILIZATION -PLAN
Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED
AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(NAME AND LOCATION OF LEASED OR AGREED PROPERTY)
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [ e% R ired�.pacification 21
/Ca�� r` �[�, �c�ree►+�r.•► f
Recommended
Soil Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Annlied2
Unnamed
j
I
i
Tract
2
CfB2
CS
18
6
198
150
" 2
CfB2
fall SG
2
6
110
80
3
CfiC2
I
i woods
Unit
4
r
100
!
100
TOTALS THIS TABLE 1
1G 2,248 1 1 780
l The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus
the required buffer areas which border streams or residential
areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most
likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources
such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
rr �d/,-- /
11

State of North Caroiina Cq
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources `
Mooresville Regional Office
.m% OWE%
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H NR Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 30, 1997
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Stanley Dairy, Facility #: 49-21
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on September 29, 1997 by Mr. AIan Johnson
of this Office. Mr. Johnson had the following observations:
- The area adjacent to the stream in the dry cow lot needs the buffer improved.
- Trees and shrubs on the storage ponds needs to be cut.
- The lot in front of the facility needs improvements.
As discussed, these are to be address by the certified farm plan.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-I699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. L.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 North Main Street, Aw- FAX [phone]
Mooresville, NorNvfcAn"h Caroiina 2811� Equd Opoorturiry/Affl1rmative Action Employer
Voice 704 -�63-1699 50 recycled:10010 post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Stanley Dairy, Facility #: 49-21
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street,
N%,PCAn
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Equal Opportunity/Affirmbtive Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 500ro recycled/100k post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to S 10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D 4ex"Ci o .) "`�"" %
Water Quali egional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please tone or print all information that does not reauire a signature
(Existing or New or ( Expanded ] (please circle one)
C 5.-
General Information:
Name of Farm:Stianley Da-iry FacilityNo: 49 - 21
Owner(s) Name: Stanley Stikeleather Phone No: 704--873-7248
Mailing Address: 159 Nottingham Circle, Statesville, NC 28625 or
6890
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: Iredell
Latitude and Longitude: —35_ _AZ_ 20 / 80 48 00 Integrator:_,,,,.,
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): Tak6 Hwy US 64�East from Statesville, NC to Bell Farm
Road SR2316 turn right and travel 2 miles, first Dairy on left.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. ofAninials
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
%AeofCattle
No. ofAnimalr
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
�C10 Dairy
360
❑ Feeder to Finish
© Pullets
,n Beef
��'�
❑ Farrow to Wean
G
250 Milk Cows
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Other Tvpe Livestock:
(�
O
40 Dry Cows
of
40 Bred Heifers
• Gilts
30 Young Heifers
❑Boars
Expanding Operation Only
PretiouSDe415,n Capacitw-230
Additional Desien Capacity: 130
TotalDesijLrn Capacity: 360
Acreage Available' or�t'aation::t4` ` _ Required Acreage: 47
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity:. 123 , 312 Cubic Feet (f13)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner: Stanlev Stikeleather
Signature:_X4_ Date: 7 / 3c2 / 2.4>0.3'
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC — August 1, 1997
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
H. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
M New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry Hendrix
Affiliation USDA, NRCS — — Date Work Completed: r~Z 1- 0 3
Address (Agency): 444 Br stol Dr. Statesville NC 28677 PhoneNo.:704-873-6761
Signature:` Ge--,e- Date: / 49- a 3
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lie Barrier, Jr
Affiliation NC DENR DSWC Date Work Completed: 2 cA
Address (
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
91 Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):^ Larry Hendrix
Affiliation USDA, NRCS Date Work Completed: 7' 29- 0.?
Address
Signature
AWC -- August 1, 1997
e No.: 704-873-6761
7 a9- 03

D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
Existing or expanding facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
J New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for sprairrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
U New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not_ using
spray irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C . L ' e Barrier,J
Affiliation__NG DENR, DSWC _ Date Work Completed: 7
Address (Agency 444 Bristo Dr. Stat sville NC 28677 —Phone No.: - -
Signature: Date: % o2 9
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan ISD�
SI, WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Li e Barrier Jr
Affiliation NC DENR DSWC Date Work Completed:1
Address (Agency): 444 Bris of r. Statesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 04-8 - 761
Signature:_ _ � Date: 7
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding S> ine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21,1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner
Date:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection Storage, Treatment Installation
New expanded or retrofitted facilitX (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
❑ The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation NC DENR DSWC Date Work Compl
Address
Signature:
This folloy
above has teen cnecxea.
No.: 704-873-6761
I approval in III. B
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner
Signature:
AWC — August 1, 1997
Date:
Date:

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry Hendrix
Affiliation USDA, NRCS „ _ Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): /mot 4 Bristol Dr.. Stat_egv; l l e, _NC_ 28fi77 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
Signature: Date: N
D) _Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Irrigation Equipment Available on Farm
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
A third party applicator will be used for Broadcase Application
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with
the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lie Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation Nc DENR �_ D sWC _ Date Work Completed: '7
Address (Agen
The following signature block is only to be led when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
1 (we) certify that 1 (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner
Signature:
Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Manaptement (SD, SI, WUP, RC or I
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality
management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lie Barrier Jr.
Affiliation NC DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed:
Address (Agen: 444 Bristol D State n1l NC 28677 Phone No.: - -
Signature: C.�Irapta-Date: 7
AWC -- August 1, 1997

Stanley Dairy
Stanley Stikerleather, Owner
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28625
Facility No. 49-21
Iredell County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
250 Milk Cows
40 Dry Cows
40 Bred Heifers
30 Young Heifers
Prepared With Cooperation Of
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
NC DENR, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
USDA, Natural Resource Conservation Service
pool
�o
July 29, 2003

crt �
ta' fig' k_.� wlLso� QP. Farm Location Map
21 . Stanley Dairy
` EX IT —"I_ - B4 . raocrtsvVa8it Facility No 49-21
I I5z E i
EXIT 153 I +"
EXIT 52µfK /
CA RIDGE, n7q S{yfPL��E4Fc o LaYv '
PL CN4 y Q E m
4 Lp R LK �Ek a O LYNMG 4
4 WILDFL9 ER N wD6dS EC, n r'+ � KELLAM, O
2 CNR1
•1 HUTS LN /! Q2:0 m CONE LN BR
_ J
— /. l .1+ S+bK�� N $i�73 9`f �k'� 5AL
j o
;` 1 1• Kati Y'4 e� �W
IFL I
EXIT 50 � eR00x
4 ST. \.i i t+0 L•
pFa i S, ti 4 G OFtGiAKYLAND DR,
FARMWOOD OOG*'' 0 E T5. 4,v
DR /r
cook
i 2319 o KS o° WAYS(DE
EXIT 498 l•.l
GREEN8RIER. ref �o a� k-W D .1gR4
70
` E Xl7 ..41A L �, "! �' i oh<v`� • CN ��� 3 z 0�"�- CRl
70
�.
FG It
\ '' `}• 1 Cc SfYEN 44K �O HlE 44µ S DR.. t'µ?0* PO s w '4 l
r Nl,
tFOX DEN �.- _ �• � �� 2 y, EW. 7D.. BAYBERR �p a'.� mgp�L3F- ly k�R
y,Rff!'`1h! x ,v4• ��•. a J� .. CEDAR '` It
/- 4.�g:JV7 O .a �t v� TU !iP CT ^OT "per ,i�
CGUNTRY `• a. �� �Q ��ia TREE IT
5Ta E
MAGNOLIA x `4 *1 %• 9 6U:lMf
y�U9 \ , _ "ILL GR, h a o \38EfL JE } ARBOR DR IN )US'
lg F-I o SYCAMORE
` 1 HOwESTEAD ^� no OR'
a
EST. �
D R: �r g
_ v
77 -I cfi
DOODLE. DRtg
Q'P
r1 "
L-tEO- H N *atiwn`i: B? �� ".az
WjgTE G EEK E DE P SDF! i n �3
DR -i LOG CNarN kP Z
V J
Clr?. ry J
�r+fir' UC v E R N� N
LOG DR.
G�, 9 �� ° 4u O� *4�i�\ a� P I �+ QLEMEI�"` J`�• ti
s Wt` ik.:La 4 s RG w
y � n y,. '� ' 'i• r � 'IINSrJY+ 4S
R BEVIS
. '-"�ri L! �q4 I f ����,. � �� v,�,r- •� W415 YE- � _ LN.=.
EXIT
C, hyy ti q HI`.IGRi
�f�Na P rJ'r" j GLASPY s
RD j
e ` r
9N GR ��i-'C."� NUF -•/. rt Bury pa +N� 44�, <
�1111S4 GM5 /- $ �� Fig NG

v I k Ck�
in qt,n� 5od ov4- maj
1 t(ra -i-P neede{j.
Ywv+ o'ft' Tron.
S; ]o
�Q a go. Us/e+ hreo,
1- D Cal -f Qr1G i vl 4, 1, S 4c
�\%; i e- q ✓a�S a�+�� -�-� o� / Q S _! +.f Yam'
i��• beViaw - Ae, i15e
a
L- o Ca,
CAYea o., 1 rev%+1e Slope
S+!- 5
p) 4 �J
Farm Site Map
Stanley Dairy
Facility No 49-21
Zoo )
�; t�ef ,,� � � Te✓ I n FT2 i ��' f aSTM�e
�r
/Usta Fyab fOQ k ge*At, Use Are,, "
170
�w a
Are
u ,
407`ro,c l -) sa' � ,a.s
g,�8,. St4,�ie Stike gather DQ
rrec�.el Coen I1IaY+h CgYd
Scp�E ,'1 Plan ielw 1
I nA JOD' w0.$`�i arf0. ew+BrsT S 57�.rn
U. S. DEPARTMENT OP AGRICU]
{f SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
�au�y
SCS-ENG-313A REV 6-75

• Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
07-29-2003
This plan has been prepared for:
Stanley Dairy
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28625
704-872-7248
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr., Environmental Spec, II
NC DENR, DSWC
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, NC 28677
704-873-6761 Ext 112
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
• the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning anima]
waste management that are included with this plan.
' ?o �.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Techni I Specialist Signature Date
•----- 3-- --33415----------------------D-----atabase----------ersi-------n --- 2-.0 ------------------------ D--ate ----Printe---------: ---- 0-7-2---9------00---•••----------
Co...ver------ Pa -g e-- 1-
Vod23

Stanley Dairy
Tract and Field Listing
.
Field Number Total Acres
Broadcast Acres Irrigated
Acres
Land Use
The fields below, have had a "JL,
VB or S "added to the number,
for identification with the
owner. Some fields have been
renumbered in a more logical pattern for ease of locating.
Tract 8473 Stanley Dairy Map 1
S 1 6.0
5.0
Cropland
Was Tract 0001, Field 1
S lg 1.0
1.0
Haylandl
Was Tract 0001, Field I
S 2 22.5
6.1
Cropland
S 2.1 8.2
8.2
Cropland
S 2.2 8.2
8.2
Cropland
S 3 24.4
7.1
Cropland
S 3.3 5.8
5.8
Cropland
S 3.4A 1.5
1.5
Cropland
S 3 AB 1.5
1.5
Cropland
S 3 AC 3.2
3.2
Cropland
S 3.5A 1.7
1.7
Cropland
S 3.5B 3.6
3.6
Cropland
S 4 8.5
8.5
Pasture
Was Field 6 with 6.7 Acres
S 5 9.0
9.0
Pasture
Was Field 4 with 6.5 Acres
S 6 4.5
4.5
Pasture
Was Field 5, with 3.3 Acres
S 7 2.0
2.0
Hayland
Was Field 7
S 8 2.5
2.5
Cropland
Was Field 1, with 8.0 Acres
S 9 3.2
3.0
Hayland
Was Tract 4314, Field 1
S 10 4.5
4.0
Cropland
Was Tract 0002, Field I
Page I

Stanley Dairy
Tract and Field Listing
Field Number Total Acres Broadcast Acres Frri aced Acres Land Use
Tract 3054 James Lentz Map 3
JL 1
9.8
8.0
Pasture
JL 2
16.4
15.0
Pasture
JL 3
8.2
8.2
Hayland
JL 4
18.4
18.4
Hayland
JL 5
8.4
5.0
Pasture
JL 6
6.4
6.4
Pasture
JL 7
13.0
13.0
Pasture
JL 8
12.3
12.3
Hayland
JL 9
12.0
12.0
Cropland
JL10
37.0
34.6
Cropland
Tract 4449 & 4450 Von Bell Map 2
VB 1
VB 2
69
2.2
6.9
2.2
Cropland
Cropland
VB 3
21.7
2 L 7
Cropland
VB 4
7.8
7.8
Cropland
VB 5
6.2
5.7
Cropland
VB 7
25.1
25.1
Cropland
VB 8
11.5
10.0
Cropland
VB 9
6.5
6.0
Cropland
VB 10
19.2
18.0
Cropland
VB i 1
10.2
9.8
Cropland
VB 12
36.0
36.0
Cropland
VB 13
6.0
6.0
Cropland
n
L_J
Page 2

i&1-,,ss.P'r, t.^, Ir;a""Wwrt^; Y '"T.' ''� *rT'7 "r•\•:" �" 45 Y u + iw ->r 4-
Nall qq r.Y p ,r,. _ "y �rl x r 1 ie " •2 -,7.. •r 7,
:. H.,i',%:.E !rF ..y d"-rt�,<.• `;th.a.,.`g,!.r,v, fi;. 4nt.r+'�'��,� '��.,,Ar,r �l'�d,- 'Tt .,' a':.'>i �_,,,. Ira .r •. h^•sr'e".n
11 aa•. ftp i �km''; k 1 1 it x f 1y1 t 1 , : 7
ir��jn+ 1 '�JJ .� �,'��'.!► ft'r }� ><S�.,R�. s�S Z - ' •� + �J I�r, ti 7 1 - F i° s r} c., •.F ?"'��S*s 1' F t S � t "• 4
r`.�•.r� r •.�¢ J `L 6'p4r !' a 1r, tl Y + 5-�
1�r.rr:..4�J.a:.a..._.........,.._...a�.r.��...a�i..�+.�..L'.�+GJ..-.^-..:.rr..-a��l'�.'✓ ivt
1t�K-N� �.C, a'�1 ;¢'2 � �..c ;1' � ��4 - yry £.s +,ya• .c r' # `x � r � A �:
([[e + t ° r+ `t'4 -::c ;� ,• �� •��. Tract and Field Map
; f '1 -
i '�q yr
+ r•�• S ��► �,�. .rs•-s s� R.� • ,=fir � .f,i�r
1� tr f \r r'D`L i4iyr;1+ i -t i. scl- I �r Staidey Dairy
y o 9-2I..
,�• (�`�;a �.![y'�` � P � �.,� �,.'-�-� �' : ���" .� r , 7 ' � . � -�r � � � t� N 4
-•Y•5r
F�cilit {.cpp-1 t r 1 s' l �d•- i Y ,r if w n F?t ,�i 4 rL
dpi < �, '�'r a, {efr..ry .P65.�l.i �¢4'�rr .:i F a�.z '"r'iti'r i". si#�s ..rz, -•! 5 w Ja"9jiA,, ^'1�:. r• .w 1SMa�,-_74 r^r.%ai4��ab 'y �igvR�litr•,'..p, g P, w'-+. fi•t 7.'- � ""fr� ¢�k�. }
ik at+��5r�•�rY T���f
t'9 ' r `)
MOW; rY i
trs «,,r'G -1. s,. r'�# ¢ .-f,t_a 'If -I T!:) T.. t• r�'r "i 5,
} ,a " ns ! 5 t t ti� i a 4, w:a ,is t �yM1,1 , ti,•r
rG� "A r*Ahr: 1�py�i�yr 1 h, r.
�?•:;{r; - .Y, �. i . i !� is r•.J rt '� S14 �' ��'�r' * � ,9M1 .,a ir` � 2 AR'• y r� � � /.l'�rj 1 3 ° �� t� � ,r r�>�
, q i ;;'..p y ._ t v A rz� i ` ��y 1j•¢ +-�- �f � � �-A � r - 4{, 6 M1. � �V• ` i V ' t r ., '� V',
ryS'-I Y l t, •'!
�•'i li .. �'.t,� �t" ► r,.. ` �'Y � "1� .}�ys� L f�4.. s'.�=-' � :.11. 1�' ltit •�4} ++ r-, k � � � � t_^ fir,
lirr a i\"'{ t - ..' r„'.�C. •? t
F i-i� ►_: O .�5 t ��11 1 -� -1..._-1..�1y M 1
t��iah t 4 'irt ..;rf �! is •^r s:,r�i f! { SF h -:: 4 t- '� r' •'-i; �iii�>ti')a .:i1` Gx a' 'i""+7 • I r' ,
t i�,. r t a,. r .,-' p ��r►� t ° I� K #• x - -•t .ki r - -� sr\a :. tJ i,-a 1 • ,,,- c'
k t e-� 5 � K ,:f t'. � :•dL K 'eel + 7 ► � rS�+f' z � [j � s 5. 11.E . i }� s . rw - , t... ., a t;
Sr'�,• '<'� '1t� ..$,`" s •(6- .�_ r * a }i' ��'lr�' ,�.�� �.•'�+T �'r .�.,�ly'� iH.R;.4 ^14��, r� 1 '� �.
t - a
'
�yt . , ��� ii t a ) 'ta a+ n � f ' ^}` ,�. Sd �'��,•- : '�",_r sy. < rF rt �' ♦• S `w�•+•c} t ''qr
�"f .i . ��4�•8 � f� �1r,.3 p, ���.�1�.
-I. �i�•3tP... i '•Rw. il�Ft°rr^ �}, r s ^� 7 "''Y: V.
Ir�`�. ��-,M1ti '"' ^ .Fw�,"4 ¢,. a liil • R -.r:
I..�kn kr•�� tt+,Qinc 'a�.r:} t �tti v�R�r tRt; -:.-z 41 s hs' '
i a Y k
�'� t .�•_- r '3 �. 'i�`�
` .,rf "ryyrti -,p``�,.yy Y� r °4} -jSr•m ..M '�if�'�''C r. ytrtir;f rle
1'f!re�'IGv Y�f• jR n. ,�, -,i "*w
,.,.,. �� 5 i,, `,rh �x, ''£Y" •� r� [ �cr a>!'i }�•- i t,y j" -,i ayrM1-yixv �� a�•,,.,:�
ir .;^ +_ � tt w-�•'. IK�J ., � `y _ ."�= F �a. r ,� � - l ��
n�AA �f
�t rf { ♦' s+• "vg �'', 9 •'4�1 11 ~;p:7+ t '/ j� �sz '�}. . r a .. 4
� F ..r•.,,� j x• a " �• y �. fa r, > ?!"i r'u � . r • r
S � � ��U i �a ; r: - r:r y � y; �z"! .YT}r��•�r � r •Y a: F r r +y : 's !
y 1x ,y. 'IIIV'4��4 rrF+•�1 +'Y4 >r �'�Cr a•.`. ". s '` ,.a - per} • �. . z ' , i'� k , ; w ,.` `% -r, ,
p '�'� t
~ yy+��� -."a rra�^,r �'� v.-,r v+'i�,„,r,„,+4ci �y �}�•s 4 �'�3 ':l r+.{.. �.r } ��_ �ir..�
r` �vw. �.; � .r t'r�-:f:.y� q,,.•: y 5 a'h yr. S rt. �p -4 `1„4� I•h�..+ � l •. 5 r��rtie fie. E r o r •uV�'. W;I�O!
�_,�,. �a,h.t'�..., c.� �8.... GP '�a +.i:l^'i � ' p:� C -r r� '4.t't.s, �,. b��' �.� t � i �.. At 4•
'. i i,°r ,1'.'' T' �•JA ti. % k�.a'^4\ ! k':\ !' r } .t �• A.d'.r i, 0. y� r zy'r�f �`� 'rr}r y"',+i
s N <
�. _�, ) ; � i � �" � r�i *^• ;^' r y in M�,� � ,^� a �1».5, r ! � •�; S'.r y .-<.1i}fig � tt�r 1-'
1t. a � � � 1
My,i 1. �[•1' l4 4 'r� p r > k, v _ �W4; s 7 F 5r 4 ,✓�" }'
�...
.-
a.jAry't FOR 5�-.. �.+ _ !" w. �' +.�ry M *'' ��s�'jj�at' Y, ik•t}'.'4 n4•. t
� :•w7t
NA, S I.' SQL - './,•� �/, {• „ h r ,v, y ! s r,
�r�
�~• th�i,4.'(Ii��S ',9�
t.
x 5 g
P ;<',� t¢r u_e r1•; t a }. �'N + 'rr t�,.
�
y,�y,�6" �,1� :{�� s♦.yt'�, �� � {.. a r,/' � t;+ t "�r� az.{+ �40y�4� 'F' < � , � `�^ � '. 1 { -• l 4 r '+n x
� r+• s P r+ \ rOil
'�1'.
i',rP h r,rf
p� ��_ � �} '�.a i.4�. /, -•M c;.;: � � ., �•,w�►, �f �4 gs`� � 9A i � � 4 F +-q i '. +y� ,� .e .. r '� H ♦ . i .'7_ � a 4 a ., rr t „
5��` 1r 1Y `i•"�,6ti#• �,f� 1 + a+ �.. ��4 ;ve oft f •, i y f n 1. f a Y . *'�' .0 ' ; f +.k
st•ltizy#?''7
r �� � a Y.. �:� �}1.: ,.• '"4" M�� :*_S \ r a ", ` wvtC"r-eM � _.. i �� � �f r_1 .r.
t f T ,' r _ %1 . _v k4 '•s yet r
Y 7rE"'n Yf f-it K. 1 •`�, _MS .1. •! .+ r _a ' /K� F* :s. _ .;f r ••� ,f.�/
cif' .f rS a' S•�'r,,,Z. r Sfr /�! 4 i r:,�; j. c•
7�'3 • S•!Vti r,t s3,4 re."� -hi
t T
+ ,.�. �. p a hws. .,•j`''.Ik::ti1� jr�}a`f - ��,'-.: 4 �r�' t rr ,;5 '� � � s .' `. � t� il ,�".
f S�Nt- �+ r�s � t �f/ Z��- a t �,ky - z •t � v � W i r 8 `,.(¢ y q�'
n �7^Tk'i�•' - � R,. �7 "•4F ' ��Y,t'�y �y "fir , �: r � S X ,r ,r �'" :� ti ' f''' r r- �¢ � ,;•
a rt yr✓ i .� s
rn r:yir►��°r ". r+F r5 c Y'°`,....-a•n.* ^p-.*..+.� �_ w -. a +rs �'s �5.: •M --t•'.. � - d•s" ' ,yi -tF
•.e
} y Y if.�y Vf47., _ .k'" s R r%1-bh W',. "• r s" ar ✓ -4F •,i • - 1•
5 ti •, � s + Jf+ "`' '_ (' 'h _ .E}3 ; .. r � r 'S I 'r' 7 ��/g��• .¢� i a t _ � ,y" >^.
- r" �',41i�{,� ;Y� S "'..._i�:...�---.,. �r� r " � �yr � x t*., -� �� c ram„? •, . 01 ,/�r�t.�u}''� 1 � � - �� �r ���•, 'i �5�;�'� � -.+f . r- � �
.fir. �a�•'� r r �3.•-:t
�. ;= �. -- ±.r'. r' �• _. 4x r r r, r • }'t •' �r-rt;r •f �++'}ta'� t.�7�� "'.
� ' f
Map 1
s r �r IV �� r is pr ..y r �` r ^• ••.`,
4 s r ��� � `� \,,..q• xt � fit:-� n� `I f °���"�r�,�x,;�``� :S# � tti '�" '
r f r• "j'^` ! _ e �h' v ° ' � � _ ?�` t yy f k .�c �" ��' , r =r : rr �+a
MINu ,.G. i h.; 't _ �` 5..,•.yfrr"`". lei J - - ' ¢

a
It„ tir
�V �r.44—'1
���',s�
� �utP J r, wy �,"�t r=
s�:• , �pt��
rj
c*"� .2 .. _ v dr•� . � :i n s'i' �+i�Y..'3.
..::w a ;�:.a . a, av
v+v' o- �vs
J we
R4,
'% TS 31i �{ 4y
19tE.� h ! 1 F6- r M s`y'L ,A(,. •ee` il''ik��;ySb� -�
�r �'• t7 dti'1•R�r � S'�fi � 71 - ,� { �4� � siF v �js =�1�„ �Vs`nuA :1
F�;T. Y>Cf r
N �•� kSM} 6 'J 1 - !1, fr4d_tr, t='
44
�IAa kla�tiwwfr\w�+i•Afti�i ''��! 7 �rr[�jk� +,.
r Su r r $ C .ri1,r.�
� coo...,�1:lIy slit
Y w
��,S4.,eha + k'�.... `�1,*,dty xl t x .' jy,• p r3 rJ, '� ld r'z ��'��� >, l ., ' .'fe ? .� S.• ��fsl.,�1� r��F: �i' `�'�'
Tract and Field Map
Stanley Dairy
Facility No 49-21
�4�., s
VIM I
*7
V,t�; ', r ti
4 t � b �. C..la
r
fF
x i
e.
hl e
F�+
X
i;ik
-t �, ,�] f+t 1 - s f1�.A ♦ - 1
•br; �;�; `. 'S,tL riM,y tr�u�
y V ]yr t
.ra
1 is �, 7 [ '•}ti. t� L�_r �� � • *�4 ��+�\��� �{F� � y � • y{ 1 r ; ..� t ' ��
Nn
r
s "r': a °:,L l _' I �a� ` i,y,: ,:.;15 t�'`Lyi.- <':f n Y,y«�' dick' , �' '�'� - ,����-F� rr, • ':�
}:. �x . P V4 :.7i� F 1 ��,� r' '�+ F •3;� � f. i'�,.\ �: ! -� �1�`t yr� "� ,1, � , r
_ a ..F {��' ; �}I �,' ,�,�rr° �, ti��• s' "4 a `, tZ4A
°��►, ff' ,�= �
5..'4 ,'' r ,�;• I:; �, I.V ,"�r r. ti\ ,} rRj r �.r" r� '1-,'5��,/�,�(Y-.:.,y, ! 1 i. ! }'S'� '�nk �h .1+'�,.L_ a]T
f�,.�fi,�.,�'�f:$�' i•�'„L., v"�r
w.'1 'r �r+i �':
%=:1 �t'`'4
f[ ° r ?irti r fiyr{' «p9r
��9rt 14,n� .., ` •• I f��l�'\•'. „'i � �I 'I♦ ��.'M ♦S ate !-v�.,' �`�+�5
3
7R ypt-. - yrl/•y';+ky [L' ;l 1 I tl t s �4 +c
' �f'
r J Y
w'44 .rfYr yi.3 f''
Map 3
�� fit' D $..: � , •' � a\�`.49 �j� 1.- �e�r-x '9C� S"" n '!�L`�%
Am
^'�L,� wM 1: �a 'br i• � -. 'a �?+ - :t ° n�l` � \ �t��t • PM' k S ,,�'+�-�-yy�
late
�t z
Lt A"Ir �tA r,�,,�+" �` �•^,,.'�'1 I, � 1. �r r .a' Yes � �'. �',!k �1: , 'J f +���'� ';x'� <L.r-W,��,.A.
.lbr 1. ! �a '`•'r.
•f nr
k a 'y* '1 7tis'Y"`lli. I+IrtFrl f.r "�YfY�+'s'
n;,,, ro'al•�'r . i ..; 1 `T r 9 ' a f� 9 ti5 1 w`77ry1- _�
�.s. ,•.�ti, r � • ,F a � a rt `s
,mil:(. � �_ Y "li' � J � i�•, 1 1iY��`q�•�i�N,R
Ni to r ` FRS p M] 1Ar"'y+et �.��•.Gr. y'

Stikeleather 'Dairy
•
•
1
I
I
I
m
I
0
�-------------------
STOP , \,
PULL
, ,
' 160' ' r 4
5A , -
I
_ L � 1
-- ——-j-ty-=--r---1--
--——— — — — — —- _ >a t `� $41 360' 140' i; i 460
t ,
` , ,'
1250' _ _02 ra It l` 4R 4C
\ 4B
1 , L��l'
1250
— — — — ..— t 1
*1 '; '; �' F IELD #3
I i
I i
t6 f I
1 i PIPE IS 6" SOR 21 GASKETED PVC
I
I
' PIPE INSTALLATION DEPTH = 36" - 42"
-------------------
FIELD #2
� , I
1
TB = THRUST BLOCK
I � �
1 5
t �
ty 1,
LAGOON _ _
\ \
\
BUFFER
----------
I
,
,
--- _ ---a
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28M
Pipe key
— 6' PR2W '.sg,.d PVC Fwa .
2' PR2W SW PVC P,p
Irrigation Map
Stanley Dairy
Facility No. 49-21
Sprinkler / Valve key
C' "•Garrvr*,pp W4AM 9 5lr+p rr y R-Th*
6' Flop Meal " Ya"
V,.Ar f Re Reims Ya6e 6'
ij+&-f • Trrficfm Y." 5'
I
Tr -Ai 4 n Ya"
Cm s D-am Y&W 2"
\"JWafr SUPP:I
Gra—Mac Distributing Co.
2310 NC Hwy. 801 N
Mocksvill4 NC 27028
Phone [phone]=
Fax [phone]U
Designed by: Ieson Graham
Data 9-27-00
Scale 1" = 1517 1 Design No. 228

• Narrative
THE STANLEY DAIRY
This plan increases the animal numbers from 230 to 360 Dairy Animals requiring management of Animal
Waste on this farm. Addition non -irrigated cropland is being added to increase the harvested cropland
available for waste spreading.
Animal Waste from confinement areas for 250 Milk Cows, 40 Dry Cows, 40 Bred Heifers and 30 Calves
are utilized on in this plan. Confinement waste, wash water, and contaminated runoff from concreted
areas are collected in a Waste Storage Pond and spread on cropland by irrigation and tanker
spreading. The Heifer and Calf confinement waste solids are collecteded from sheds, watering, and
feeding areas and spread broadcast on non irrigated pasture and hayland.
Not all the acreage in the irrigated fields can be covered by irrigation. These areas can be utilized for
tanker or solids spreading.
All waste spreading and waste irrigation will be recorded as support information for future planning of
crop nutrient needs, as well as agency reviews.
CROP NOTES
There is not sufficient N produced for the animal waste to meet all the crop and forage needs. Additional
fertilization will be required. Soil test and waste sample results can be used to determine the additional
is nutrients needed.
N or Nitrogen referred to in this plan is actually PLant Available Nitrogen or PAN as used in the plan.
Plant Available Nitrogen is the nitrogen from applied animal waste that is available during the growing
peried for a' specific crop.
The PAN applied for corn planted for silage, but not needed and harvested for grain will need to be .
reduced by 45 %. Small grain planted for silage and harvested for hay of grain will not need any
reduction in PAN since the PAN requirment is nearly the same.
The PAN applied Small Grain used as cover crop is limited to 30 lbs., which must be deducted from
the PAN -of theAllowing-crop.
The Small Grains,'Fescue Grass and Ordard Grass'growth cycles fall with in two crop years, fall and
Spring. The Soft Ware used for this plan divided the PAN by 2 if application is scheduled for both
seasons as I do in the plans I prepare. The result is for record keeping you will need to add the fall
and spring applications together for the crop year total.
Check the waste application periods in Waste Utilization Tables for all the crops to be grown.
crop.
--------- -- ----- --- - -- - ---------- -- --- --------- - ---------- - ------ - ---- - - -
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-29-2003 Narrative Page Page 1 of 2

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to
use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the
indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the
plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being utilized. Waste
should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient application
amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application
of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract I
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
lh A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
lbsIA
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
--3054
JL 1
U8
Wilkes
9-80
8.00
Fescue Pasture
3.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
126
0
0
Broad.
126
13,02
0
104.16
0.00
-3054
JL 2
U8
Wilkes
16.40
15.00
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
141
0
0
Broad.
141
14,57
0
218.55
0.00
-3054
1L 3
U8
Lloyd
8.20
8.20
Coin, Silage
19.1 Tons
2/15-6130
20$
0
0
Broad.
208
21.49
0
176.24
0.00
-3054
1L 3
U8
Lloyd
8.20
8.20
i
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
0
0
Broad.
78
8,01
0
65.67
0.00
-3054
JL 4
U8
Lloyd
18.40
18.40
Corn, Silage
18-7 Tons
2/15-6/30
204
0
0
Broad,
204
21,08
0
387,87
0.00
-3054
JL 4
U8
Lloyd
18.40
18.40
Orchardgrass Hay
3-4 Tons
8/1-7/31
151
0
0
Broad,
76
7.80
0
143.55
0.00
-3054
JL 5
US
Congaree
8.40
5.00
Corti, Silage
24.9 Tons
2115-6/30
271
4
0
Broad.
271
28.00
0
140.02
0.00
--3054
JL 5
U8
Congaree
8.40
5.00
Orchardgrass Hay
3.6 Tons
811-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
80
8.27
0
41.33
0.40
-3054
JL 6
US
Cecil
6,40
6.40
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
811-7/31
144
0
0
Broad,
140
14.47
0
92.59
0.00
--3054
IL 7
U8
Lloyd
13.00
13.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
13.74
0
178.66
0.00
-3054
JL 8
U8
Chewacla-P
12.30
11.00
1 Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad-
291
30,07
0
330.77
0-00
-3054
JL 8
U8
Chewacla-P
12.30
1 1.00
OrchardgrassBay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad-
76
7.85
0
86-39
0-00
--------------•------------------------------------------...--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------- -- ------ - ----
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 WUT Pa1:e 1

0 • •
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Ibs/A
Comm.
Fett.
Nutrient
Applied
1bs/A
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
-3054
JL 9
U8
Chewacla-P
49.00
49.00
Corn, Silage
27.4 Tons
2/15-6130
285
0
0
Broad.
285
29.45
0
1,443.04
0.00
-4449
VB1
U8
Cecil
6.90
6.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
5.53
0
38,15
0.00
4449
VB I
US
Cecil
6,90
6.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
14.881
0
102.67
0.00
-4449
VB 2
US
Chewacla-P
2.20
2.20
Sniall Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
911-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
4.91
0
10.80
0.00
�4449
VB 2
U8
Chewacla-P
2,20
2.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9115
177
0
0
Broad.
177
18.29
_ 0
40.24
0.00
--4449
VB 3
US
Appling
21.70
21.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
56
5-74
0
124.45
0.00
-4449
VB 3
U8
Appling
21.70
21.70
i
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9/15
156
0
0
Broad-
156
16.12
0
349,80
0.00
-4449
VB 4
US
Appling
7.80
7.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
5.63
0
43,93
0.00
-4449
VB 4
U8
Appling
7.80
7.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9115
152
0
0
Broad.
152
15.71
0
122.51
0.00
-4449
VB 5
US
Wickham-P
6.20
5.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
5.0E
0
28.57
0.00
-4449
VB 5
U8
Wickham-P
6.20
5-70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
01
Broad.
128
13-23
0
75.39
W)O
4449
VB 7
U8
Wickham-P
25.10
25.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.9 Tons
9/1-3131
99
0
0
Broad-
50
5.12
0
128.39
0.00
4449
VB 7
US
Wickham-P
25.10
25.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
132
0
0
Broad.
132
13.64
0
342.36
0.00
-4449
VB 8
U8
Chewacla-P
11,50
10.00
Coin, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
291
0
20
Broad,
271
28.00
0
280.03
0.00
4449
VB 8
U8
Chewacla-P
I L50
10.00
j
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
4.91
0
49,08
0.00
-4449
VB 9
US
Wickham-P
6.50
6.00
Com, Silage
20.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
222
0
20
Broad-
208
21.49
0
128.96
0-00
-4449
VB 9
US
Wickham-P
6.50
6.00
Small Grain, SilagrAiay
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
49
5.01
0
30.07
0.00
-4449
VB10
US
Chewacla-P
19.20
18.00
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
2115-6/30
291
0
20
Broad.
271
28.00
0
504.06
0.00
-4449
VBIO
U8
Chewacla-P
19.20
18.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
4.911
0
88.35
0.00
-4449
VBIII
US
Chewacla-P
10.20
9.80
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
291
0
20
Broad.
271
28.00
0
27443
0.00
-4449
VBI l
U8
Chewacla-P
10.20
9.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
4.91
0
48.10
0.00
--4450
VB12
U8
Lloyd
36.00
36.00
Com, Silage
19.1 Tons
2115-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
19.43
0
699.35
0.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 7/29/2003 WUT Page 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Ebs/AI
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
A
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N I
N
N
lbslA
1000
ga11A
tons
1000 gals
tons
--4450
VB12
U8
Lloyd
36.00
36.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
49
5.01
0
180.42
0.00
--4450
VB13
U8
Cecil
6,00
6.00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad,
203
20.98
0
125.86
0.00
--4450
VB13
U8
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
5.63
0
33.79
0.00
8473
S I
U8
Cecil
6.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tans
911-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
109
I F26
0
56.32
0.00
8473
S 1
U8
Cecil
6.00
5.00
Com, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
4
Broad.
223
23.04
0
115.22
0.00
8473
S ]p
U9
Cecil
1-00
1.00
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
43
0.00
43.26
8473
S 2
U8
Cecil
22.50
6.10
Small Grain, Silage/Flay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
11.06
0
67.45
0.00
8473
S 2
U8
Cecil
22.50
6,10
Com, Silage
20.0 Tans
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
22.53
0
137.41
0.00
8473
S 2.1
U8
Cecil
8.24
8.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrip.
109
12.39
0
101.59
0.00
8473
S 2-1
U8
Cecil
8.2()
8.20
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
4
Imp.
223
25.35
0
207.85
0.00
8473
S 2.2
U8
Cecil
8-20
8.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
brig'
109
12-39
0
101.59
0.00
8473
S 2.2
U8
Cecil
8.20
8-20
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6130.
223
0
0
Irrig.
223
25-35
0
207.85
0.00
8473
S 3
U8 I
Cecil
24.40
7.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9-4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
104
10.75
4
76.30
0.00
8473
S 3
U8
Cecil
24,40
7.10
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15 6130
213
0
0
Broad.
213
22.01
0
156.27
0.00
8473
S 3.3
U8
Cecil
5.80
5.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrip.
104
11.82
0
68-56
0-00
8473
S 3.3
U8
Cecil
5.80
5.80
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6130
213
0
0
Imp.
213
24,21
0
140.42
0.00
8473
S 3.4A
U8
Cecil
1.50
1.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrip.
104
11.82
0
17.73
0.00
8473
S 3.4A
U8
Cecil
1.50
1.50
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrip.
213
24.21
0
36.32
0.00
8473
S 3.4B
US
Cecil
1-50
1.50
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrip.
104
11.82
0
17.73
0.00
8473
S 3.4B
US
Cecil
1.501
1,50
1 Cora, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6130
213
0
0
Imp.
213
24,21
0
36.32
0.00
8473
S 3AC
U8
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
1 104
0
0
Imp-
1 104
11.82
0
37.83
0.00
8473
S 3.46
U8
Cecil
3,20
3.20
m, CoSilage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrip.
213
24.21
0
77.47
0.00
----------------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 WUT Pape 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field I
Source
LD,
Soil Series
Total
'Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
]bs/A
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrieni
Applied
lbs/A
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
Y000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
8473
S 3.5A
U8
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
brig.
104
11.82
0
20.10
0.00
8473
S 3.5A
U8
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrig.
213
24.21
0
41.16
0.00
8473
S 3.5B
U8
Cecil
3,60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Irrig.
104
11.82
0
42.56
0.00
8473
S 3.5B
U8
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
01
Irrig.
2131
24.21
01
87.16
0.00
8473
S 4
U9
Cecil
8.50
8.50
Fescue Pasture
3-8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
0
0
Broad.
127
0.00
30
0.00
251.04
8473
S 5
U9
Cecii l
9.00
9.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
31
0.00
278,37
8473
S 6
U9
Cecii l
4.50
4.50
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
31
0.00
139.18
8473
S 7
U9
Cecil
2,00
2.00
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
811-7131
195
0
0
Broad.
195
0.00
45
0.00
90.70
8473
S 8
U8
Cecii
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
109
11.26
0
28.16
0.60
8473
S 8
U8
Cecil
2.50
2.50
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2115-6/30
223
0
0
Broad.
223
23.04
0
57.61
0.00
8473
S 9
U9
Appling
3.20
3.00
Fescue Hay
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
51
0.00
152-09
8473
SIO
U8
Appling
1 4.50
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
113
0
0
Broad.
113,
11.68
0
46.71
0-00
8473
S10
U8
lAppling
4.50
4.00
Com, Silage
22.2 Tons
2115-6/30
1 242
0
0
Broad.
1 242
25.01
0
100.03
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
9,342.25
ti `
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,654.00
r ,=` a' :.- ,
Balance, 1000 gallons
-7,688.25
Total Applied tons
;>.n
934.64
Manure Solids
Total Produced tons
Iv--:5ro g `
788-00
Balance, tons
= "
-166.64
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol -means leased otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol' means user entered data.
-----------------------------------------------------------------•-------------------------------------------------------------------- •-- ---------- --- -------- •------------- --------------- -- --
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 WUT Paae 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Ibs/A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gaVA
tons
1000 gals
tons
-3054
JL 1
U8
Wilkes
9.80
8.00
Fescue Pasture
3.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
126
0
0
Broad.
126
13.02
0
104.16
0.00
-3054
JL 2
U8
Wilkes
16.40
15.00
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
141
0
0
Broad.
141
14.57
0
218.55
0-00
-3054
JL 3
U8
Lloyd
8.20
8.20
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
0
0
Broad.
78
&.01
0
65.67
0-00
-3054
JL 4
U8
Lloyd
18.40
18.40
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
811-7/31
151
4
0
Broad.
76
7.80
0
143.55
0.00
--3054
JL 5
U8
Congaree
8,40
5.00
Orchardgrass Hay
3-6 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
80
8.27
p
41.33
0.00
-3054
JL 6
U8
Cecil
6.40
6,40
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
811-7131
140
0
0
Broad,
140
14.47
0
92.59
0.00
-3054
JL 7
US
Lloyd
13.00
13.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
13.74
0
178.66
0.00
--3054
JL 8
U8
Chewacla-P
12.30
11.00
Orchardgrass Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
76
TS5
0
86.39
0.00
-3054
JL 9
U8
Chewacla-P
49.00
49.00
Corn Silage Silage
27.4 Tons
2115-6/30
285
0
0
Broad.
285
29.45
0
1,443.04
0.00
--4449
VB ]
U8
Cecil
6.90
6.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
5.53
0
38.15
0.00
--4449
VB 1
US
Cecil
6.90
6.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
20.46
0
141.17
0.00
-4449
VB 2
U8
Chewacla-P
2.20
2.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
4.91
0
10.80
0.00
-4449
VB 2
U8
Chewacla-P
2.20
2.24
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
2115-6130
291
0
20
Broad.
271
28.00
0
61.61
0.00
--4449
VB 3
U&
jAppling
2 L70
21.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
56
5.74
0
124.45
0.00
--4449
VB 3
U$
Appling
21.70
21.70
Corn, Silage
21.8 Tons
2/15-6/30
238
0
20
Broad.
218
22.53
0
488,82
0.00
--4449
VB 4
U8
Appling
7.80
7.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9-8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
5,63
0
43-93
0.00
--4449
VB 4
U8
I Appling
7.80
7.80
Corn, Silage
2L2 Tons
2/15-6130
231
0
20
Broad.
211
21.80
0
170.06
0.00
--4449
VB 5
U8
Wickham-P
6.20
5.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
5.01
0
28.57
0-00
-4449
VB 5
U8
Wickham-P
6.20
5-70
Com, Silage
20.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
228
0
20
Broad.
208
21.49
0
122,51
0-00
--4449
VB 7
U8
Wickham-P
25.14
25.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.9 Tons
9/1-3/31
99
0
0
Broad.
50
5.12
0
128.39
0.40
-4449
VB 7
U8
Wickham-P
25.14
25-10
Com, Silage
21.4 Tons
2/15-6/30
233
0
20
Broad.
213
22.01
0
552.45
0.00
--4449
VB 8
U8
Chewacla-P
11.50
10.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
4.91
01
49,08
0.00
------------------------------- --------------------------•--- ---------------- --- ------ --- -- -- --- ------------- -- ------------ -- -
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 WUT Page 5

• • 0
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
I Field
Source
1.13,
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Aeq*d
Ibs/A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Ib A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gaVA
tons
1000 gals
tons
-4449
VB 8
U8
Chewacla-P
11.50
10.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
18.29
0
182.90
0.00
-4449
VB 9
US
Wickham-P
6.50
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
49
5.01
0
30.07
0.00
--4449
VB 9
US
Wickham-P
6.50
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
13.23
0
79.36
0.00
--4449
VBIO
U8
Chewacla-P
19.20
18.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
481
4.91
01
88.35
0.00
--4449
VB10
U8
Chewacla-P
19.20
18.00
Soybeans, Matrured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
18.29
0
329.22
0.00
-4449
VB11
U8
Chewacla-P
10,20
9-80
t SmallGrain, Silage/Hay.
*9.0Tons
9/1-3/3)
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
4.91
0
48-10
0.00
-4449
VB1 i
U8
Chewacla-P
10.20
9.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9115
177
0
0
Broad.
177
18.29
0
179.24
0.00
--4450
VB12
U8
Lloyd
36.00
36.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
49
5,01
0
180.42
0.00
-4450
VB12
U8
Lloyd
36,00
36.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
13-23
0
476.16
0-00
--4450
VB13
U8
Cecil
6-00
6.00
Sma11 Grain, Silage[Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
5.63
0
33.79
0.00
- 4450
VB 13
U8
Cecil
6-00
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad-
144
14.88
0
89.28
0.00
8473
S 1
U8
Cecil
6.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
109
1 L26
0
56,32
0.00
8473
S I
U8 11
Cecil
6.00
5-00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6130
1 223
0
0
Broad.
223
23.04
0
115.22
0.00
8473
S Ig
U9
Cecil
1.00
1.00
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
43
0.00
43.26
8473
S 2
U8
Cecil
22.50
6. 101
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
11.06
0
67.45
0.00
8473
S 2
US
Cecil
22.50
6.10
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
22.53
0
137.41
0.00
8473
S 2.1
US
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig.
109
12.39
0
101.59
0,00
8473
S 2.1
U8
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Co-, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6130
223
0
0
Irrig.
223
25.35
0
207.85
0.00
8473
S 2.2
US
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3131
109
0
0
Irrig.
109
12.39
0
101.59
0.00
8473
S2.21
U8
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Corn, Silage
1 20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
0
Irrig.
223
25,35
0
207.85
0,00
8473
S 3
U8
Cecil
24.40
7.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
104
10.75
0
76.30
0.00
84731
S 3
U8
Cecil
24.40
7.10
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15 6130
213
0
0
Broad.
213
22.01
0
156.27
0.00
------------ --------- - ------ ---- - - -- - ----- -- ----- - ------------------------- - - ----- • ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • - ----------------- ----------------- • ------ -----------------
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 WUT Page 6

• . 0
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitmgcn
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
Ibs/A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
lb A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gal1A
tons
1000 gals
tons
8473
S 33
U$
Cecil
5.80
5.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Irrig. 1
104
11.82
0
68.56
0.00
8473
S 3.3
U8
Cecil
5.80
5.80
Com, Silage
19-5 Tons
2/15-6130
213
0
0
lrrig.
213
24.21
0
140.42
0.00
8473
S 3,4A
U8
Cecil
1.50
1.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9-4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrig.
104
11.82
0
17.73
0.00
8473
S 3.4A
U8
Cecil
1.54
1.50
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
]frig.
213
24.21
4
36.32
0.00
8473
S 3AB
U8 I
Cecil
1.50
1.54
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
0
Irri,.
104
11.82
0
17.73
0.00
8473
S 3AB
U8
Cecil
1.50
1.50
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrig.
213
24,21
0
36.32
0.00
8473
S 3AC
U8
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
lrrig.
104
11.82
0
37.83
0.00
8473
S 3.4C
U8
Cecil
3,20
3.20
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
2115-6130
213
0
0
Irrig.
213
24.21
0
77.47
0.00
8473
S 3.5A
U8
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
brig.
iO4
11.82
0
20.14
0.00
8473
S 3.5A
U8
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6130
213
0
0
brig.
213
24.21
0
41_16
0.00
8473
S 3.5B
US
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/3 f
104
0
0
Irrig.
104
11.82
0
42.56
0.00
8473
S 3.5B
U8
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
2131
0
01
Irrig.
213
24.21
0
87.16
0.00
8473
S 4
U9
Cecil
8,50
8.50
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
811-7/31
127
0
0
Broad.
127
0.00
30
0,00
251.04
8473
S 5
U9
Cecil
9.00
9,00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
31
0.00
278.37
8473
S 6
U9
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
31
0.00
139.18
8473
S 7
U9
Cecil
2.00
2.00
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
195
0
0
Broad.
195
0.00
90.70
8473
SS
U8
Cecil
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.8 Tons
911-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
109
28.16
0.00
8473
S 8
U8
Cecil
2.50
2.50
Com, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
0
Broad.
223
57.61
0.00
8473
S 9
U9
Appfing
3.20
3.00
Fescue Hay
4.9 Tons
8/1-7131
218
0
0
Broad.
218
t010,
0.00
152.09
8473
S10
U8
Appling
4.50
4.00
Small Grain,Silage/Hay
10.2Tons
9/1-3/31
113
0
0
Broad.
113
46.71
0.00
8473
S ]0
U8
Appling
4.50
4.00
Corn, Silage
22.2 Tons
2/15-6/30
242
0
0
Broad,
242
100.03
0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ---------- •-- - ---- -
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 WUT Page 7

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
fibs/A)
Ibs/A
1000
Source
Total
Use,
Applic,
Applic.
Traci
Field
I.D.
Soil Series
Acre
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
Ibs/A
gaUA
tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
8,134,47
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced. 1000 gallons
1,654.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
-6,480.47
,r.
Total Applied, tons
_ -
954.64
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
- .r� ;.:��� ;A.
7$8.00
Balance, tons
-" ` ,t: fir' i
166.64
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol' means user entered data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ---- -- -- - ---
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 WUT Page 8

C�
0
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U8
Stanley Dairy Animal Waste Slurry waste generated 1,654,000 gals/year
by a 330 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
16007
Incorporated
21827
Injected
24737
Irrigated
14551
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
89,316.90
9,342,254
-7,688,254
Year 2
77,628.60
8,134,473
-6,480,473
U9
Stanley Dairy Animal Waste Solids waste generated 788.00 tons/year by a
110 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3388
Incorporated
4492
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Quantity Applied
(Tons)
Surplus/Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
4,105.00
954.64
-166.64
Year 2
4,105.00
954.64
-166.64
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard -values._ Refer -to -North Carolina-Cooperative-Extension-Service-publication-AG-439-42-
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
Note
333415
--- ---------- -- --- - --------- ---- ---- - ----------
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
Database Version 2.0 Date Printed; 07-29-2003 Source Page Page 1 of I

• Narrative
ANIMAL WASTE SOURCES
NOTE - 40 Dry Cows and 40 Bred Heifers are included in both of the sources below.
U8 - Stanley Dairy Animal Waste Slurry
1,918,000 gals. of animal waste slurry is produced annually of 250 Dairy Cows, 40 Dry Cows and
40 Bred Heifers.
16,001 lbs. of Plant Available Nitrogen is produced by this source.
See Stanley Stikeleather Farm, Waste Management System by Samuel C. Bing, Dated 3-11-03,
Sections III, A., B., and VI, C. for support information.
U9 - Stanley Dairy Animal Waste Solids
788 tons of animal waste solids are produced annually by 40 Dry Cow, 40 Bred Heifer, and
41 30 Young Heifers.
3,388 Ibs. of Plant Available Nitrogen is produced by this source.
See Stanley Stikeleather Farm, Waste Management System by Samuel C. Bingham, dated 3-11-03,
Sections V, B, C and D and Section VI, A and C for support information.
•--------- -- ----- --- ----- ----- -- --- --- --- -- •-- ---------------------- - -----
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-29-2003 Narrative Page Page 2 of 2

:7
The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
8473
S 2.1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
8473
S 2.2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
8473
S 3.3
Cecil
0.40
l.0
8473
S 3.4A
Cecil
0.40
1.0
8473
S 3.413
Cecil
0.40
1.0
8473
S 3.4C
Cecil
0.40
1.0
8473
S 3.5A
Cecil
0.40
1.0
8473
S 3.513
Cecil
0.40
1.0
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 7/29/2003 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

•
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where
available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
3054
JL 1
9.0
Wilkes
Fescue Pasture
3.4Tons
3054
JL 21
9.0
Wilkes
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
30541
JL 3
15.0
ILloyd
Corn, Silage
19.1 'tons
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
3054
JL 4
15.0
Lloyd
Corn, Silage
18.7 Tons
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
3054
JL 5
8.0
Congaree
Corn, Silage
24.9Tons
Orchardgrass Hay
3.6 Tons
3054
JL 6
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
3054
JL 7
15.0
Lloyd
Fescue Pasture
4.OTons
3054
JL8
9.0
Cliewacla•P
Corn, Silage
28.OTons
Orchardgrass Hay
3.6 Tons
3054
JL 9
9.0
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
27.4 Tons
4449
VB 1
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
4449
VB 2
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
Corn, Silage
28.OTons
4449
VB 3
15.0
Appling
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.8 Tons
4449
VB 4
15.0
Appling
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
4449
VB 5
15.0
Wickham-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7Tons
Soybeans, .Manured,.Double Crop-
33 bu.
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
4449
VB 7
15.0
Wickham-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.9 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.4 Tons
4449
Via 8
91)
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
-
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
•9,0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4449
VB 9
15.0
Wickham-P
Corn, Silage
20.9Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
&3415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-29-2003 PCS Page Page 1 of 3
OTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

•
•
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (1-1)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
44491
VB l O
9.0
Chewacla-P
Cam, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4449
VBII
9.0
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4450
VB 12
15.0
Lloyd
Cam, Silage
19.1 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4450
VB13
15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
37 bu.
8473
S 1
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
8473
S Is
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
8473
S 2
I5.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
8473
S 2.1
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Corn, Silage
20,5 Tons
8473
S 12
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9,8 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
8473
S 3
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
8473
S 3.3
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Cam, Silage
19.5 Tons
8473
S 3.4A
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
8473
S 3.413
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9A Tons
Cam, Silage
19.5 Tons
8473
S 3.4C
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
8473
S 3.5A
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
8473
S 3.5B
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
8473
S 4
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8473
S 5
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8473
S 6
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
3415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-29-2003 PCS Page Page 2 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

0
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
8473
S 7
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4A Tons
8473
S 8
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tonsil
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
8473
S 9
15.0
Applina
Fescue Hay
4.9 Tons
8473
S 10
15.0
Avolinlr
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.2 Tons
[Corn,
Silage
22.2 Tons
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 14
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian
Forest Buffers (391).
0
&3415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-29-2003 PCS Page Page 3 of 3
OTE: Symbol r means user entered data.

• The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
i
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
IStarileyDairy Animal Waste Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
7115
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
121
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
150
1
7
119
1
8
88
1
9
58
1
10
180
1
11
150
1
12
119
2
1
88
2
2
60
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
150
2
7
119
2
8
88
2
9
58
2
to
I80
2
11
150
2
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
• ------ -------•-------•------..--.--------.--••--••--••--•---•--------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----------
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 07-29-2003 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer- does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
• 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated -on conventionally -tilled cropland:-Wh'en waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
------------------------------------- -- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 Specification Page 1

n
LJ
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
. areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------- - --- --- -- ----- --- ----------------- - ---- --
333415 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 7/29/2003 Specification PaR-e 3

Stikeleather Dairy
1
1
1
I
I
1
,
I
,
1
,
t
,
1
,
5
M
1 I
STOP 1 .
1 PULL I 1
I l
45 --4.
I
, 160' L ` r 4
1 5A 11 '
If �
- - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ re 1 1 44 360 r-"- 149' i ' ,1 460
1250' - ^ - - 'B t, ' 4A 4\ � 4B , / 4C
s2 1 V v /
4 . /I /
4 S8
1 1 _ _ — — _ — —
_-_ 1250 1 ; a-s3----860
,- _ — — — — _ — _ - 7g 1 i
�` F IELD #3
- i 1
l --- of
I 1
' I 1
i PIPE IS 6" SOR 21 GASKET® PVC
-
1 i
PIPE INSTALLATION DEPTH = 36" - 42"
----------- ---------
` 51
4 1
y
ei:B
— ..----------------------
FIELD #2
,
>e
i TB = THRUST BLOCK
1 1
1 \
\
4
\
M9 MW MM
BUFFER
f
i
i
i
1
I
I
I
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28825
Pipe key
2' MES SWPVCPip.
Sprinkler / Valve key
(P;,Gwmw**p ISKPM-B Sfrry R-P w'Q.F
6" F 6-a. M.I Gef. V. M.
Ijdw,t • i.a.. flu R.Valve 6'
id {w,f TrrA0= Yeb. 6'
Tra Flc4,e" Ve"
v@ if.l.r am 11
Gra-Mac Distributing Co.
2310 NC Hwy. 801 N
Mocksville, NC 27028
Phone [phone]
Fnz 910-998-3111
Designed by: Jason Graham
Date 9-27-00
scale: 1" = 4w 1 Design No. 228

4
EXHIBIT D-I
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Stanely StikPl Pathar County: _ Tredel I _
Address: 154 Nnf ting}L C1 rd o
Statesville NC 28625 Date: 9-27--00
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE 1 - Fiend Specifications
Field]
Number
Approxlmule
Nlaalilt Hill
Useable Size
of Fleld2
(ecru)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Ntarlmurn
Applicellon
Rete3
(1whr)
NIo=Irttum
AppUcatlon
ptr lrripalion
Cycle3
(Inches) Comments
Cecil
Corn Sila e & SG Silage
.4
1 .6
I
ISee attached leap.
2'roial field acreage minus required buffer areas.
31terer it, iJ. C. Irribalion Guide, Field Office "Technical Guide, Section If G. Annual application must not exceed the ubronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
NRCS, NC
l UNG, 1996
4 ,

•
EXHIDrr D-2
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
FNIake, Iltotiel and Type of Equipment:
Long 1560 Traveler_ w/ 1250' of 3.75" ID PE hose & Nelson SR150 Gun w/ 1.1" Taper Bore Noz
Field Not
and
Itydrent Not
Travel
Speed
(fl/min)
Application
Rate
(in/hr)
TRAVEI LLANE
Effective Effective
Width (n) Length (11)
wetted
Diameter
(fett)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Art
(inches) Gun (psi) Reef (psi) Pat1em3
pprTx7�. Pull App. Pull
-Comments Gallons
2.1
3.3
.3
260
1250
360
1.1
70
107.
320
379 Min. 111,805
.3
260
1250
360
1.1
70
107
320
379 111,805
3
3.3
.39
260
860
360
1.1
70
107
320
261 76.995
3.4A
5,P
.318
150
360
210
1.1
70
107
180
62 18.290
3.4B
5.8
.38
240
140
360
1-1
70
107
180
24 7,080
3.
.39
240
460
360
1.1
70
107
320-
139 41.005
5A
5.8
.39
260
160
360
1.1
70
107
180.
28 8.260
3.5B
3.3
.30
260
480
360
1.1
70
107
320
145 42,775
1+li�Min. i _015
23.6 Hours Gallons
,see attached 11101).
2S11tNv sLp7Srttte entries for ends hydrant 10CtdiO11 in each ficttt,
;Use the tidlowing abbreviations fur various arc pattents: F (full circle), "IQ (three quarters), IT (two thirds), 1-1 (half circle), I' (one third), Q (one quarter)
Mity alsO uSC dCgfV-CS Of are,
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

EXHMIT D-3
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field Not
and
Llne Not
Number of
Hydrants
Welted
Diameter
(feet)
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
Along Between
Pipeline . Pi elines
Application
Rate
(inlhr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
(inches) a Gun (psi) A Hydrant r)
Comments
ISee attached snap.
2Sti0+v separate entries for ouch pipeline will► hydrants in cacti field.
NRCS, NC
JUNE. 1996

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
295
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
132
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
.38
Hose Length (feet)
2 r
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
None
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
PTO
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
65
t
TABLE S - Thntst Block Specifications
Declaner may riro►•ide thrust Wrack details on senarate sheet -
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (s q. ft.)
900 Hend
9
Dend End
9
Tee
9
H drants
9
Drains
9
'Sec IJSDA-NftCS Field Office "Cechnical Guide, Section IV, Practice. Code 430-DD.
EXHIBIT DA
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

EX1 IIBIT D-5
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
.Name: Jason Graham
Company: Gra-Uac Distributing CnrltpatzY ^^_
Address: 2310 NC Hwy 801 N Mocksville NC 27028
Phone: [phone]_ 1_
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
11te following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
1. - A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thntst block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Asstunptions and compulations for detennining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to detennine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
-1. Sources and/or calculations used for detennining application rates.
5. t_'utnputations used to dctertuine the size ofthntst blocks and illuslralions of all thntst block configurations required in the system.
6. Munufaeaurcr's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. h7unufaclnrer's spccificalimis for the irrigalion pipe undlor USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Witter Conveyance,
N.C. field Ofl'ice'fechnical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
K. 'ilte infannalion required by this limn are the rnininttan requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site turd address them as
appropriate.
9. lorigation pilks should not toe inslulled in lagoon or storage lwnd entb,tttkments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A butler strip 25 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the Gnlits of tite irrigation systeut <uxl all perennial
streams and surf tee waters pCr NC Slnlutes.
NRCS, NC
TUNE, 199G

Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
ee attached sheets for additional specification and operation information.
EXH03rr D-6
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

Wettable Acres roL y
0
`rravhl` ,ane space :� = �- Nc�a nr .:sLing tc/
StarC Stops Total
►�1 n�.1. Pu.lt �;nd Table L X W/43560 ToLzil End! Table Acres
-32
- - - 6- o . AIC70--
14 D AIER -AO
150
` -�-=-3-- 3.91

G11 A -.M A6 (GO�M11311:,1Ny
De,tiign — Sines — Scrike
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
�! [.TTIiONC: ADVANCE CRCHANGE
13iai 99n.3232
1336) 990.3600
NC IOLL FRE.L 1-600-AZZ-3`-�6U
L.J
11
2310 NC HWY. 001 N
MOCKSV1LLE, N. C. 270.0
Specifications Sheet
St:ikeleather Dairy
1.- Wettable -acres under traveler coverage is ± 33.5 acres.
2. Traveler is a Long 1560 with 1-250' of 3.75" ID PG hose and a Nelson SR7.50
gum with a 1.1" Taper_ Bore nozzle.
3. Nelson SR150 gun performance with a 1.1" taper bore nozzle is 295 GPM. 360'
diameter. @ 70 PSI.
4. Friction loss in 1250' of 3.3" ID PE hose at 295 GPM is 37 PSI.
5. Friction loss in 6" SDR21. 200# pressure rated gasketed PVC pipe at 295 GPM
is .27/100'.
6. Liquid velocity in 6" SDR21. 20011 pressure rated gasketed PVC pipe at 295 GPM
is 3.4'/Sec.
7. Maximum pressure requirement is as follows:
Gun 70 PSI
1250' of 3.75" ID PE hose 37 PSI
2440' of 6" SDR21 PVC pipe 7 PSI
Elevation ± 30' 13 PSI
Misc. 5 PSI
132 PSI
305 Head Feet
S. Application Rare is as follows:
96.3 x GPM 360
3.14 x .9 radius X ARC
96.3 x 295 360
409
3..14 x .9 180 x 320 - 28� x 1.125 .38 In/Hr

Desqn — Sales — Seri*:e
COMNLE'Tr IFZF41GAnON SYSIEMS
11. 10110NE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
13.761 990-3800
NC IOLLFRFE
Specifications Sheet
Stikeleather Dairy
Page 2
9. System travel- speeds are as follows:
320° Arc
19.3 x GPM
Lane x Application Depth
19.3 x 295 5694
240 x .6 = -FF.+ = 39.5 In/Min
3.3 Ft/Min
= 198 Ft/.Hr
310 NC, 11V.'i-. U,.' I N
MOCKSVILLL, N. C. 270_10
1801 Arc
3200 - 1.77 x 198 - 350.5 Ft/Hr
1800
5.8 Ft/Min '
10. Pump is a Gorman -Rupp MB4A20A-B Slurry PTO pump.
11. Pump maximums are ± 150 PSI and ± 1000 GPM.
12. Pump -horsepower requirement for 295 GPM at 132 PSI will be approximately 65 HP.
0

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE; ADVANCE EXCHANGE
13361 9OS-3232
1336) 998.3800
NC TOLL FREE I-BOO-422-3560
Operations Guide
SL:ike.l,eather Dairy
System Start -Up
2310 NC HWY, 801 N
MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
1. Attach traveler to hydrant and slowly (<2 MPH) pull out gun cart.
2. Attach ptulip to system. Open main line gate valve slowly.
3. Prime pump with tractor at low RPM.
4. Open pump discharge valve slowly.
5. Allow all air to purge from the system.
6. Raise tractor RPM until designed pressure is met. (132 PSI)
7. Start traveler engine and allow to warn.
8. Engage traveler drive and set to designed speed.
• 9. Observe the system to make sure the system is operating properly. (Acc of gun.
travel speed. system pressure)
System Shut• -flown
1. At the end of the travel pull, Lhe..traveler will automatically stop. the-..
engine.
2. Lower tractor RPM slowly.
3. Close the pump discharge valve slowly.
4. nisengaCe the tractor_ PTO.
5. Close the system main line valve.
6. Reopen the pump discharge valve to relieve any pressure that may be present.
7. Remove discharge hose from pump and system.
8. Stare pump.
System Flushing
t. Flushing of the system lines will need Lo take place after the complete pump
cycle. or if the system is not going to be used for several days.

ri
ILJ
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
[phone]
13381 998.3800
NC TOLL FREE 1.800.422.3560
Operations Guide
stiluAcauller D'd r.'y
Paae2
Flushing Cont.
2310 NC HWY. 801 N
MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
2. System will require a minimum of approximately 6000 gallons of clean water
to flush properly. More would be better.
3. Run the clean water until the system runs clear. (The traveler will need
to be placed at hydrant #5 and moved to hydrant Pia to flush line entirely)
Winterization
1. Open all drains in the system. (Only after flushing!)
2. Make sure pump discharge gate valve is left open.
• , 3. After system has'drained, close the pipeline drain valves.
4. Make sure traveler guri cart has been lowered to the ground and the drain
plug opened.
5. Spray lubricant (WD-40) into pump suction intake. Rotate PTO shaft so that
impeller and pumphousing are coated. This will help.to prevent corrosion
during the winter.
6. If gas is left in the traveler engine. treat with a stabilizer. (Sta-Bil)
Maintenance
1. Do -not operate the system if any part is -damaged..
2. Replace any worn or damaged parts as soon as possible.
3. Grease hydrant stems anually.
General
1. Do not operate the system under the following conditions:
Wind greater than 10 MPH
Rainy weather
Just after a rain event
. In freezing weather or i.f the ground :is frozen

GRAB -MAC DISTR][BUTiNG COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
1
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE 2310 NC HWY. 801 N
1336) 998.3232 MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
13361 990-3000
NC TOLL FREE 1.800.422-3560
Operations Guide
Stikeleathec Dairy
Page 33
General Cont.
2. Follow waste utilization plan as it is written.
3. Haul as much of the solids as possible and/or agitate frequently. (System
will work much better the more liquid the material is.)
4. Make sure that no waste is running from the fields. If it is running. speed
-the traveler up to a speed at which runoff stops.
5. If runoff occurs, have a safety plan in place.
6. Never open any drain valves unless the system has been flushed.

• Waste Utilization — Application Agreement
I, G a s r km, 6 F PAN S G C3+ �� ' � , 5-. -A'r' hereby agree to
apply waste generated by Stanley airy, in a manner that meets the USDA-NRCS
Waste Utilization Standard (633), to land owned or (eased by Stanley Dairy.
1, Stanley Stikeleather, operating as Stanley Dairy will provide 30 days notice of the
need to empty my waste storage pond, to allow reasonable scheduling of the service.
This agreement will remain in effect until, I am notified to discontinue or I decide to
discontinue this service, in which case, I will give 60 days notice.
Applicator: Date
Farm Operator: Date�.�8 03
Stan ey StikeIeather
0

­6M 8P7PL-�1 V_
r
32
A w,
Topo Map
Stanley Dairy
Facility No 49-21
1u, rr.,
- 07
Ij
�i� 1U
r
7
-P
� J,� � ��`�: �' ���I �l' 'i� _I4,/ r,��)�+rr 1 { i 0Ur f'�/It ��, '%' �' rl1 �� � -=� IJI I'''./r,
.71
Ur
q tV J!, 61 1
J
��"C
lu
J!,
L
77
� X
_j
j,
A 1�
\j
0)
It,
Z,1 q� .0j"
2
�y
tin -J,
Mani,
Z, a er
v
_j
t
\4
M",
[a n k
V
if
' 1, j ( 11l r ^i-r .-(%1/, �• r[�. `� � _ (! \,} ! � 4f � � _„ �-f ,rf T `VL I fl , - :-, Sil( V Il�t r 'ri: I _ ��,`.\
'T
6 _7
�y
� cl
V
ti\: r �, \ n• 67
IN
A I
0 Iz- It
Clop'—\k
J_
T
J,
Cameron C .1
- 67
( �2
4N
"K 1 •`,��' ,�\ f,
36
C� -P
i ON,
1 7Q
3
'y 236
(S H E P H IT R D S; 518 4 T3 0" 519 520 INTERIOR -GEOLOGICAL S I
48455 W NE !Qj

mffo���
Topo Map
Stanley Dairy
Y Facility No 49-21
X)
IF
`Cj
11P —NIT
Id
-,j
y l�l ����'N 1�=��'" {�?�' /���/y}+Ij �`��.� /�._�.�>� sk�,�`,- ��'- ,.1, r �,, }�
4, P7
79
r r` • � ���rv�/.�; `�',s; '.`1 _.-•1 rfr -,�, \ ��'�:,:;_r'/� }} �����'�.�'� {�" j a�;t�/%f ��y, ''_<ti, �,' �r^ �' S,I; J � .Jr ��� '+ ;'1 � � 1��'?(�� J
I I
�f
C.r Mi
��ri �•���= _ L�', ,}n--RI f�t�ti� ,��'-., 1 � 1 4t JI-' f '`�l; �F�-'';`,•%��i'!� f='�,��',/ `�`'1 -��,�ilr�l (lei ,I' .. J
`r �..��� I - Y '�_�_ �� fr'� r, -� � /I� r 11 � I /� ��[ r(% r �, t �� ' `.j! (� J
L
IA
�. _ ALI �-7�- � LIB ; �Yv-�;�_ -; fi.__ \1t� �,.���\ � � �l i - _���,tj ��`"�-` ,�\ � rr �856�1�i �\,�L'`�} � ii p_1 / � =`:. ��I � —�'1 so / ts� J
- _\� ; , I _ J
"jjr
!Ij le. r[ ! �5� / ,.-.I, J
I'X

s
Wu 00
�; ff
I its �a�d 5� or� rv1a� be
A i-P needej .
Yuw c-Fi -Tre•�
S+ to
5D.
I
r�
( flw�: f &`�''� Use Aetoq
;. below ea
vV L15e
0
� Z" waL+fl�2
Q;pe.
C,,Ije- CIAf b
'a p c(T'
W o 5t..— Sc
'it 4
F.-,lte,
16.SAL
Ps4urr-
�r
18"C pQ c.,..l �er�` qe Use Ares
Io -
; ��.
�0"11;
S�A�E
Farm Site Map
Stanley Dairy
Facility No 49-21
Say f. zoo 1
Orv� 6o�.+
La..]„ ,Aveo.
.,
SCS-ENG-313A REV 9-75

•
i
Operation and Maintenance Plan
for a
Waste Management System
Prepared for
Stikeleather Dairy Farm
Iredell County, North Carolina
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
and
USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service
March 2003

. Table of Contents
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
System Overview ................... I ....
3
Waste Storage Ponds .................
4
Milking Parlor WasteWater piping ..................
5
Waste Hauling System ................. 1
. 5
Clean Water Collection and Piping System .................
6
Concrete Curbs ..................... I
... 7
Vegetated Diversion ..........................
7
Livestock Exclusion ........................
8
Filter Area Planting ..............................
8
Stock Trails ... I ..........................
9
General Comments .........................
1.... 9
Additional Considerations and Responsibilities ........
9
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN .................. 13
Odor Control Checklist 15
Insect Control Checklist .............................. 18
Mortality Checklist 20
2

SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following major
components:
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPING
3. WASTE HANDLING EQUIPMENT
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
5. FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREAS
and the following associated components
6. CONCRETE CURBS
7. VEGETATED DIVERSION
8. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
9. FILTER AREA PLANTING
10. STOC K TRAI LS
All waste is scraped from the lots and freestall barns and stored in the WASTE
STORAGE POND. Waste is irrigated or hauled from the WASTE STORAGE
POND and spread at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND are
. designed to provide storage for the wastes produced by 250 milk cows 40 dry
cows and 40 Bred Heifers.
Also, contaminated runoff flows into the WASTE STORAGE POND. The waste
storage pond is designed to provide storage for normal runoff from the drainage
areas and waste water from the milk barn and provide storage space for the
twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm runoff from the drainage areas.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of
Animal Waste Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year,
twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required under the Non -discharge regulations.
Runoff from lounging areas and small feed areas is diverted through 100' or
greater of vegetated filter area. Vegetated filter areas are located below
lounging areas near freestall barns and all gravel heavy use areas.

1. WASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store manure, runoff and
wastewater. Additional storage space is included to contain the twenty-five (25)
year, twenty-four (24) hour storm runoff from the feedlot. A post will be installed
with the level of the top of post indicating the level of storage available prior to
infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity. The WASTE STORAGE
POND consists of earthen dams and concrete push offs for discharging
contaminated water and manure into the structures.. The maximum storage
level below the emergency spillway elevation is shown below for the pond. The
design storage period is also shown.
Max. level below ESW
Design Storage Period
Pond at Milk Cow Freestall
Barn
1.0
180 days
OPERATION
The service life of the WASTE STORAGE POND will be determined by the level
of management for the entire system. Once the manure and bedding materials
have reached the WASTE STORAGE POND, how effectively the waste is
agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the WASTE
STORAGE POND.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WASTE
STORAGE POND, Poor management will result in the rapid accumulation of
solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to
the point that some form of dredging will be required. If a large volume of solid
waste is allowed to wash from the lot and/or if inadequate agitation is performed,
this dredging operation could be required in a very short period of time.
4

MAINTENANCE
The concrete in the WASTE STORAGE POND should be inspected periodically
for major cracks. Vegetation on the dams should be inspected periodically and
reseeded as needed to maintain a vigorous stand. The dams should be mowed
at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place
only when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a
height of less than four (4) inches at any time. See FILTER AREA PLANTING
for further maintenance requirements. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage
should be reported to the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District office.
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPING
OVERVIEW
The milking parlor wastewater piping consists of a pipe from the milking parlor to
the waste storage pond..
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the pipe components for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or
. replace as needed. Inspect the structure regularly and remove accumulated
solids.
3. WASTE HAULING EQUIPMENT
OVERVIEW
The waste hauling equipment consists of tanks for slurry manure and irrigation
system for slurry waste. Slurry tanks are loaded with an agitator pump system.
Sand/Manure accumulations will be remove from pond by mechanical loading on
side slinger manure spreaders and spread on application areas.
OPERATION
Manure spreading should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full
storage level marker in the waste storage pond. When the liquid level in the
WASTE STORAGE POND reaches the marker, liquids must be removed by
irrigation or spreader tank for land application. Do not spread in such a manner
as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not spread on frozen or saturated soils.

The initial step in each spreading operation is to properly agitate the waste in the
waste storage pond. Slurry waste will be irrigated on field near waste pond and
slurry tanks will be used for fields away from the main farm.
MAINTENANCE
Soil tests the application fields annually. Vegetation in the fields should be
inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand.
Fields may also need to be limed and fertilized annually.
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
Clean water collection and piping consists of piping clean water under stock trails
and diverting clean water around lounging and feedlot areas and waste storage
ponds.
MAINTENANCE
i Inspect the components of the CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING
SYSTEM annually for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as
needed. Inspect annually and remove accumulated sediment.
11
6

5. CONCRETE CURBS
OVERVIEW
The concrete curbs constructed around the feedlots and freestall barns are
required to divert water and waste into waste storage ponds.
MAINTENANCE
The concrete should be inspected periodically for major cracks.
6. VEGETATED DIVERSION
OVERVIEW
VEGETATED DIVERSIONS are located above the WASTE STORAGE POND
and will convey non -contaminated runoff around the structures. Diversions will
also be located around the feed areas to divert clean water.
MAINTENANCE
• The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically and reseeded as
needed to insure a vigorous stand. It is essential that neither vehicles nor
livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within the diversion. The diversion
should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The diversion may
be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take
place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or
mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches. If sedimentation has reduced the
capacity of the channel, contact the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
for technical assistance in correcting this problem. See FILTER AREA
PLANTING for further maintenance requirements.

7. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION is installed at locations as indicated on plan maps.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or rot.
If fencing wire becomes loose, re -tighten. If fence posts are rotted or damaged
in any way, replace damaged posts.
8. FILTER AREA PLANTING
OVERVIEW
FILTER AREA PLANTING applies to seeding 100' of grass below the lounging
areas and seeding diversions.
MAINTENANCE
• Soil samples should be taken at least once per year. Fertilizer and lime should
be applied at the rates recommended as a result of the soil test. Fertilizer and
lime should be applied either during September -October or February -March.
Vegetation should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a
vigorous stand.
The filter area may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing
operations must take place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should
not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches. All FILTER
AREA PLANTING should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth.
Mowing operations must take place only when the soil is dry and vegetation
should not be mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time. Do not
mow cool season grasses during periods when plants are showing signs of
drought stress.
The number of cattle allowed on lounging area/pastures is critical to success of
the filter areas. Cattle housed exclusively on pasture should be limited to a lower
stocking rate during wet winter months. A stocking rate of 4 cows per acre
during the winter is suggested as an acceptable rate. Actual stocking rate
should be based on how well vegetation is maintained in pasture especially near
drainage ways.
8

• 9. STOCK TRAILS
OVERVIEW
Stock trails are located as indicated on plan maps.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the stock trails periodically for damage and wear. If gravel layer
becomes thin, gravel shall be replaced to maintain a minimum of 4" of cover over
the filter cloth. Manure accumulations in broad -based dips on stock trail shall be
removed at regular intervals to prevent overtopping.
GENERAL COMMENTS
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable
vegetation, especially that of the filter area, diversion and dam, is not adversely
affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted by
its labeling. To protect yourself, never apply any pesticide in a manner or for a
purpose other than as instructed on the label or in labeling accompanying the
pesticide product that you purchase. Do not ignore the instructions for use of
protective clothing and devices and for storage and disposal of pesticide wastes,
including containers.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water conservation District if repairs or major
modifications are required for any of the components of this Waste Management
System.
Additional Considerations and Requirements
The collection, treatment and storage facilities shall be properly
maintained and operated at all times; this also includes the land
application equipment and sites.
2. A suitable vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land application
sites and buffers in accordance with the Waste Utilization Plan. No waste
may be applied on fields not approved by or prepared in accordance with
0 the Waste Utilization Plan.

3. An acceptable pH of the soil shall be maintained on all land application
sites to insure an optimum yield for the crop(s) being grown.
4. The plant available nitrogen (PAN) application rates and hydraulic loading
rates identified in the Waste Utilization Plan shall not be exceeded.
5. Application of animal waste on land which is used to grow crops for direct
human consumption (e.g., strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage, etc.)
shall not occur within 30 days prior to or during the planting of the crop or
at any time during the growing season, or in the case of fruit bearing
trees, 30 days prior to breaking dormancy. For fiber and food crops,
which undergo further processing, application of animal waste shall not
occur within 30 days of harvesting. If waste is to be applied to bare soil,
the waste shall be incorporated into the soil within 24 hours after the
application on land.
6. Domestic wastewater from showers, toilets, etc. shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system. Wash vats required to be
connected to the animal waste management system by the Grade A
Pasteurized Milk Ordinance Part II, Section 7, Item 5r are exempt from
this requirement. Wash -down of stock trailers owned by and used on the
dairy only will be permissible as long as the design accommodates the
additional wastewater and as long as detergents and disinfectants are
used which have been labeled as readily biodegradable by the
manufacturer.
7. Disposal of dead animals shall be done in accordance with the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) regulations and the Waste
Utilization Plan.
8. Grazing of animals on application sites shall be controlled in accordance
with USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service Standards.
9. Solid materials such as, but not limited to, bottles, gloves, syringes, silo
covers or any other solid waste from the dairy operation shall be
prevented from entering the waste management system and shall be
disposed of properly.
10. The facility must have either adequate animal waste application and
handling equipment on site, a lease for the use of necessary equipment, a
contract with a third party applicator or a contract for the purchase of the
equipment. In all cases, the equipment must be capable of applying the
waste on sites specified in the Waste Utilization Plan and at rates not to
exceed agronomic and hydraulic loading for the sites.
10

• 11. Animal waste shall not be applied to wetlands or surface water or shall not
reach wetlands or surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances (pipes or ditches), direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste, which
reaches surface water, is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation by the
Division of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
12. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding at less than 5 tons per
acres per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more
tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen. When animal waste is to be applied on
acres subject flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation -tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast, provided the application does not occur during a
season prone to flooding.
14. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided
• adequate vegetative filter strips are present.
15. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
16. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet to dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
17. Waste shall not be applied on other property or public right-of-ways.
18. Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
19. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils
shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excess levels. Soil test and waste analysis records shall
be kept for 5 years.
20. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate. No ponding shall occur.
0

21. Records of waste application shall be maintained to establish actual
. application rates. The records will include date of application, amount of
waste applied per acre by tract number and field number, most recent
waste analysis and soil test report, and the realistic yield expectation
(RYE) nitrogen rate. Waste application records shall be maintained for 5
years.
22. Proper calibration of application equipment should be done to ensure
uniformity and accuracy of spreading rates.
23. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should be
considered also.
24. It is the responsibility of the owner of the dairy to secure an update of the
waste utilization plan when there is a change in the operation, number of
animals (increase), method of utilization or available land.
12

E
I -
CATEGORY EXAMPLES ACTION
CONTACTS
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff - 704-878-3180
full or partial loss of a lagoon wall
property, contact 911 or Sheriffs Dept.
resulting in a release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-873-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
5353
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor- Church Brother
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
Grading, Inc.
contain the waste on the farm
704-876-1615
Tech. Spec. - 704-873-6761, ext. 3
'4. Contact the technical specialist who
certified the lagoon
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1.. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or Emergency Management at 704-663-
from base or sidewalls of lagoon;
1699
waste discharging from
underground tiles
Tech. Spec. - 704-873-6761, ext. 3
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
Local Contractor -Church Brothers
these may result in complete
technical specialist can assess situation
Grading, ---Inc.
structural failure
7 04 - 87 6 -1615
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
I
Anticipated single storm events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping '
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker

•
Lagoon Overflow
* Add soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam
* Pump wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate
* Stop all additional flow to the
lagoon (waterers)
* Call a pumping contractor
* Make sure no surface water
i is entering lagoon
r
Runoff From Waste
Application Field
* Immediately stop waste
application
* Create a temporary diversion
or berm to contain the waste
on the field
* Incorporate waste to reduce
further runoff
Leakage From Waste
Distribution System
* Stop recycle (flushing
system) pump
* Stop irrigation pump
* Close valves to eliminate
further discharge
* Separate pipes to create an
air gap and stop flow
Leakage From Base or
Sidewall of Lagoon
* Dig a small well or ditch to
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
back into lagoon
* If holes are caused by
burrowing animals, trap or
remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type
soil
* Other holes may be likewise
temporarily plugged with clay
soil

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids
Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
lY Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and pits Crusted solids O Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation W Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
watert edge on irnpoundment� perimeter.
Feeders • Feed spillage I' Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying %yastage "
1W Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15 to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page I

• • •
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site S ciftc Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storage,,areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewed; grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
Mr Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed stoke as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal Er Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Q` Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal {+�' Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; IS to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
Or Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
l' Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AM[C - November 11. 10% naaP 7

Dairy Farm Waste Managemot Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Vegetative or wooded buffers
Recommended best management practices
RGood judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn
• Wet manure -covered
A
Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces
surfaces
2(
Promote drying with proper ventilation
L
Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
• Urine
Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial
1
MJ
Replace wct or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
• Partial microbial
❑
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial C7 Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface decomposition ❑ Tank covers
• Mixing while filling ❑ Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying It Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
1r Agitate only prior to manure removal
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial ❑ Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition 99 Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when em t in
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions IW Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets Sr Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page I

Dairy Farm waste Management odor Control Cheddist
Source
Cause
B_MPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure,
e Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges _ ^
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑1
Soil incorporation within �48 hours
field surfaces
l�
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
V
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
©
Plush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain . Agitation during wastewater 04 Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater 0' Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission gr Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
0 Minimum agitation when pumping
C] Mechanical aeration
Fr Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation 1r Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles . Wind drift A" Minimum recommended operating procedure
it Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
i�r Plush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November f 1, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site S ecific Practices
Dead animals + Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water + Improper drainage V Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities + Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto + Poorly maintained access Cal Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Dcsign and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11. 1996, page 3

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

0'
STANLEY STIKELEATHER FARM
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION: LOCATED on SR 2316
LONGITUDE - o8o°48'12.39" W
LATITUDE - 035047'38.49" N
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 250 MILK COWS
40 DRY COWS
40 BRED HEIFERS
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
Mac E erton, Civil Engineer Technician
APPROVED BY: _
DATE'-.
REVISION: March 2003
Mr. Stikeleather is planning to expand by building a
new freestall barn. Waste Pond storage period will be
reduced to accommodate expansion.

INDEX
I. Waste Production
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
B. Heifer Housing
C. Clean Water Exclusion
D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
E. Waste Utilization
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1.
Normal Runoff for 180 day period
2.
Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3.
25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
S.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
5.
Waste Volume
7.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump
out elevation and ESW elevation
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
VII. Operation and Maintenance Requirement
0

•;' Appendix
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Aerial Photo
Operation and Maintenance Plan
Old Waste Storage Pond Design, Filed in FIELD OFFICE
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Vegetation Specification
Treatment of Critical Erosion Areas with Permanent Ground
cover
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Drawings
Plan View
Plan View Drawing 3-97
0,
1 of 2
2 of 2

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Production
250 cows can be milked on Mr. Stikeleather's farm.
Manure, milking parlor wash water and polluted runoff are
stored in a Waste Storage Pond constructed in the mid
1980's. Manure is irrigated with an irrigation system. Some
manure will be truck hauled to cropland at other farms.
A maximum of 40 dry cows are kept in a lot near the
barn and fed hay in a covered feed barn. Dry cows are also
fed silage at milk herd feed area once a day.
Milk cows have free access to a lounging area during
dry days.
Day old to 400 lb heifers are confined to barns and
sheds. 400 to 1000 lb heifers are housed on other farms.
Close Up Bred Heifers are pastured near the barn and fed
silage at milk herd lot once a day. Hay rings are used in
pasture to feed hay.
Runoff from trench silos flows through a grass filter
before it reaches a stream.
• II. Waste Management Objective
The system economically as possible handles all the
waste production described above in a manner that does not
degrade air, soil or water resources. The system prevents
discharge of pollutants to surface and ground water by
recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A waste storage pond is located near the feedlot and
freestall barn. Waste collected on concrete from the milk
herd, dry cows and bred heifers will be stored in the waste
storage pond.
Irrigation is used to empty this pond. Truck hauling
is also be used periodically to apply manure on fields away
from the farm.

B. Heifer Housing
16.5 acres of steep pasture are available for a maximum
of forty 1000 to 1200 lb heifers. Hay is fed to large
heifer group on a heavy use area in the pasture. Silage is
fed to this group at the milk cow feed area. The 400 to
1000 lb heifers are removed from the farm. Day old to 400 lb
heifers are housed in old barns and sheds on the farm or
moved to other farms.
C. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water is excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage pond to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
Livestock are fenced out of the waste storage pond.
Fencing is maintained above the 100 feet vegetative filters
located below the lounging areas. The filters infiltrate
part of the first Bush and filter sediment and organic
particles.
A diversion below the silo diverts silo leachate
.`s through approximately 200 ft of grass.
E. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land is available to properly spread waste
at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains air,
soil and water resources. Waste applications are based on
soil and waste analysis. See the waste utilization plan
prepared for this farm.
F. operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan is attached.
9

III.
Waste Storage
Pond
for Manure, Milking
Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted
Runoff
A.
Design Volumes
1.
Normal Runoff
for
180 day
period
Use average runoff
values
in Ag. Waste
Management Field
Manual
for Iredell
County.
Drainage Area
= 19,700
sq
ft Surface =
19,700 sq ft
Unsurface
= 0 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
°s
DEPTH
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20 0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25 0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24 1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25 0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23 0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27 1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26 1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31 1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32 1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30 1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25 0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23 0.87
1.7
Try 6 months:
October through March Surface Runoff Depth = 12.41"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.4311
Surface Runoff= 12.4111 * 19,700 sq ft= 20,373 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff=5.43w* 0 sq ft = 0 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surfaces
22.26 minus 12.2 = 10.0611 = 0.8 ft/6 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.9111
25yr--24hr runoff=_4.2L" * 19,700 sq ft = 8,060 cuft
12"/ft
Ll

�) 4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
5. Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.5 ft
6. Waste Volume
a. Milk Herd
250 milk cows are typically on the concrete lot
approximately 80% of time. A lounging area will be used
some. For this estimate, 90% waste collection will be used.
Volume = 250 cows * 14gal/day/cnw * 180 days * 90%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 75,802 cu ft
b. Dry Cows
40 dry cows spend approximately 1096 of the time on the
concrete lot.
Volume = 40 cows * 14 gal/day/co * 180 days * 10
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 1,348 cu ft
& b. Bred Heifers, 1000 to 1200 lbs
40 bred Heifers spend approximately 10% of the time on
the concrete lot.
Volume = 40 bred heifers * -1 gal /dayfheifer *180 days * 10%
7.48 gal/cu ft
1,059 cu ft
C. Total Volume
= 75,802 cu—ft + 1,348 cu ft + 1,059 cuft= 78,209 cu ft
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 100 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 150 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water 300 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water so gal./day
500 gal./day
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
= 12,032 cu ft

. r{
.,;
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
20,373
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0
Cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
8,060
cu
ft
4.
Manure
78,209
cu
ft
5.
Wash water
12,032
cu
ft
TOTAL
118,674
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
0.8 ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5 ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.5 ft
TOTAL
2.8 ft
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
"AS BUILT" Volume
1.5:1
&: 2.1:1
106.8' X 187.2'
60' X 130'
2.1:1
2.3 .1
Volume = 10.2/6[60' *1301+ 96.7'*174.91+ 4(78.4'*152.5)]
= 123,312 cu ft
Approximately 4,000 cu ft.is available for solids
accumulation. This is equivalent to about 200 tons of sand.
Based on Mr. Stikeleather's anticipated use of sand, this
should provide about 4 years of sand accumulation storage
before the waste storage period starts reducing below 180
days.
Normal Pump Out Volume =
20,373 + 78,209 + 12,032 + .8 * 106 * 187
_ .126,472 cu ft per 180 -days--
= 256,457 cu ft per year
= 1,918,000 gal per year
= 70.6 ac-in per year
Maximum pond level
0.5' + 1.5' + &,060 cu ft/{100' * 1801}
= 2.5' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 2.5 below the top of dam elevation of the pond.
iThe emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.5 foot below
the top of dam elevation.

•.' IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions are constructed around the waste
storage pond. The District Conservationist designed all
diversions. Diversions shall carry the 25 year - 24 hour
runoff plus capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering is difficult to install and
maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter areas
The stock trails and heavy use areas consist of 9" of
compacted ABC stone over a filter cloth. Runoff from these
areas and lounging areas is directed across grass sods.
Vegetated filters shall be maintained between lounging areas
and drainage ways. Filters shall be 100 ft wide.
• A. Milk Cows
Milk Cows have access to lounging area located near the
freestall barns. Vegetative filters at least 100' wide will
be maintained downhill of the lounging areas.
0

•,' B . Dry Cow Group
40 dry cows are located next to the milk cow lounging
area. Dry cows are fed hay in a covered feed barn.
Vegetated filters are maintained below the lounging areas.
A one wire electric fence will be constructed around a draw
near mid point of lounging area to provide additional filter
area in the drainage way. Cattle are fed silage daily in
the freestall barn.
Approximately 50's of the manure produced by dry cows is
collected around hay rings under the covered roof. The
manure pack is periodically spread on cropland.
Volume = 136 cu ft/3 month/cow X 40 cows X 50% X 12 months
= 19,880 cu ft
C. 1000 to 1200 lb Heifer Group
40 heifers are on pasture. A heavy use area (50' x
501) is used to feed hay. Approximately 251 of manure will
be collected and spread around feed area.
Volume = 388 cu ft/yr/cow X 40 heifers X .25 = 3,880 cu ft
D. Day old to 400 lb Heifer Group
• 30 young heifers are kept in sheds and barns near the
milking herd. Approximately 75% of the manure is collected.
Manure will be collected and spread as needed.
Volume
of manure=30 calves*1_-S gal/hd/day* 365 days*.75= 1,647 cuft
7.48 gal/cu ft

.J VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for the milking herd, dry cows and bred heifers
is stored in a waste storage pond for approximately 180 days
and is irrigated or truck hauled.
During the course of one year, this facility stores
70.6 ac-in per year of slurry waste. Daily scraping of
waste is required to move the waste into the storage
facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at
other parts of the farm:
1. Dry Cows 19,880 cu ft
2. 800 to 1200 lb Heifers 3,880 cu ft
2. Day old to 400 lb Heifers 1,647 cu ft
Total 25,407 cu ft
If this waste weighs 62 lbs per cu ft, 788 tons will be
spread each year.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
• Runoff from stock trails and lounging areas.is diverted
through 100' vegetative filter areas. Grass sods are
maintained all year round. These areas maybe controlled
grazed in late spring and early fall when ground is dry.
Weeds may require chemical control or periodic bush hogging.
Grass filters 100' wide from drains are fenced and
maintained in a good grass sod.
•
f

•�Y
C. Nutrient computations
a. Waste Storage Pond
TOTAL NLTTRTENTT)TSPOSAT ___LOSSES AVATLABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 40,002 lbs. 0.40 16,001 lbs.
P205 25,171 lbs. 0.70 17,620 lbs.
K20 37,762 lbs. 0.70 26,434 lbs.
227 lbs PAN per ac-in
or 8.3 lbs per 1000 gal
b. Other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL NTJTRTFNTS DTSPOSAI, LOSSES AVAILARLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 7,879 lbs. 0.43 3,388 lbs.
P205 4,953 lbs. 0.70 3,467 lbs.
K20 6,867 lbs. 0.70 4,807 lbs.
C. Total Available Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 19,389 lbs
P205 21,087 lbs
K20 31,241 lbs
VII. Operation and Maintenance Requirement
The waste management system keeps pollutants out of the
streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity is
maintained in the waste storage pond and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond reaches a point 2.5 feet
below the top of the dam, the storage pond shall be emptied.
A post will be set with its top at this elevation.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall.be checked
and repaired as required.

N /*
NO
7.
Y1
Sf
T� 1A
71
T
K_v
W,
M
az\
Lourse
0.
Aj;
Q�
��L��� ,,, , � / �a�s1 �� � '•�, '•��"''"�`�;j' �. `� `' � ���, ' : ,{ •; . 1� 1 ,� lam. � C..J � )
[W f V kk�_ (61, 1
Name: STATESVILLE EAST Location: 035'47'41.6" N 0800 48'02.4" W
Date-, 3/11/2003 Caption: Stanley Stikeleather Dairy
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Location
Iredell County, North Carolina
capyrignt M) 190, Maptech, Inc.

U.. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner
Community or Group No.
County Tr-ede ) l
Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam 13 Ft. Length of Flood Pool 1 2 (j_Ft•
Date of Field Hazard Investigation
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev.:Est. Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements: of Breach
Reach:
Length:
Width:
Slope: Land Use
Improvements
Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft.
%
Ft. Ft,
(/1
rio
3
.
Describe potential for loss of.life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach 7')n �' P_
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) a
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)_
By
Concurred By
ame ti tl e
NOTE.: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date y- T- ?7
Date

r�
U
VEGETATION SPECIFICATION
Rip and disk all disturbed area 5" deep. Incorporate two tons of lime
per acre. Apply 1000 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre and smooth seedbed.
Uniformly apply 60 lbs. of fescue seed per acre and 25 lbs. of Abruzzi
rye grain per acre. Seeding should be completed between March 15 and
June I or August 15 and October 15. Immediately mulch with 2 tons of
small grain straw or tame hay -per acre. Reseed any rilled or gullied
areas that may develop.
Note: SCS will determine area to be seeded before vegetative work is
started.
I

i real[]
:rosin
Dermi
;ever
102111 vl
Aree
lasso* f
ij
t ll
n"• i1 t ;t'Q'I. l � ;' r .- � � ''.l it
is A \:•Iw, a 1 r .{�'!7'1�- [' l .{f t !4
�„1 � i i-w�F-'k-� i.Xlrx llyl��yl'd"�}'a'!pyt�"y!y t ��J12.��r!"i 1Y <All ,`��.F� ✓��i ids i���ll
�I 7ir 'S. i i� y '3. .i hi ?, ) � lS•1��f �. 1 :1?Y?� 1
>v,.'r � f e,�,���.�,1�2rri �� it i.Ly �_r -il! « i�a•�i,hjd+•�. ,:.��T a3lR rt7� '%-iy,_r t'��'-' }r'�"�
-Y �•! ?�t,t iriy*,!✓' 2 ��v�� l l-•�a15li +i rf..lvp5y I �.?!)
+�w4c4 .._:.�II���'T�'r'�j:A
osinn ju
u
t' '1�e A 4
f+
777
:y r�"'�'Tr•-1: ?',i.J�� w I� � ql��� ��Fy �il}�,' ��,,/71}'f
�i� I �" ANC i� f 11' �`�•. 5 j�'.ir �,�' .,;';��'�;
Gs,
� J C
I ~- ` 'A tUi �,.t•.y a3l��N'- �,�{7'�csai ����r�)k
r

enhances establishment of ground
cover and minimizes maintenance.
Site Preparation
Where equipment will travel over
the site during planting and/or for
maintenance after establishment,
slopes should be no steeper than
3:1. Where practical, fill and
shape gullied areas. Install neces-
sary water control measures such
as diversions, waterways or out-
lets, subsurface (tile) drainage and
terraces. Remove all debris, such
as stones, tree stumps, etc., that
may interfere with seeding and
maintenance operations.
Seedbed Preparation
Scarify surface to a depth of at
least four inches with a disk or
other suitable method. In some
situations, such as drainage ditch
banks, spoil banks, etc., scarifica-
tion can be excluded if lime, fertil-
izer, and seed are applied to the
roughened surface within one or
two days after earth moving.
Lime And Fertilizer
The amount, timing, and method
of application of lime and fertilizer
materials are very site specific.
These are to be determined by the
person providing assistance from
the SCS office, in accordance with
current guidance in 342-1I of the
Field Office Technical- Guide.
Plant Selection And
Specifications
Select plants which are best suited.
In making the selection, keep in
mind the plants' characteristics, cli-
matic adaptation, the intended
use, and level of maintenance re-
quired. Suggested time of seed-
ing, rates of seed and mixtures for
specific uses should be obtained
from the soil conservationist.
Whenever available, certified seed
tested within six months before
seeding should be used. Legumes
should be scarified, if necessary,
and inoculated with the proper
strain of nitrogen -fixing bacteria be-
fore seeding.
When grass is established by using
stolons (sprigs or runners), use pre-
caution to make certain only fresh,
moist planting material is used.
Seeding Or Planting
Uniformly apply seed with a drill,
cultipacker seeder or hydroseeder.
Seed may also be broadcast by us-
ing a whirlwind or cyclone seeder
or by hand. Cover the seed 1/4 to
1 inch deep, depending on the
size of the seed, and firm the soil
except where a cultipacker or hy-
droseeder is used.
Mul�.._.�
ching
Mulching is a very important step
in establishing -vegetation on criti-
cal areas. Mulch will help hold
moisture, protect soil from ero-
sion, hold seed in place, and keep
soil temperatures more constant.
It should be applied uniformly by
mechanical means or by hand.
Some bare soil should still be vis-
ible through the mulch. Hay or
straw or other fibrous mulches are
best for mulching newly seeded
areas. Most mulch materials are
subject to blowing and must be
tied down by anchoring or press-
ing into the soil. Netting, asphalt
spray, peg and twine, or other
methods may be used.
Maintenance
Lime and fertilizer should be ap-
plied under a regular program
based on soil fertility test and the
use and general appearance of the
vegetative cover. In the absence
of a soil test, the following are sug-
gested lime and fertilizer rates:
One to two tons of limestone per
acre every three to five years, and
at least 40 pounds each of nitro-
gen, phosphorus, and potassium
(400 lbs. of 10-10-10 or equiva-
lent) per acre annually. Nitrogen
may be reduced one-half or more
if legumes are established alone
with grasses.
Care should be taken not to dam-
age the vegetation mechanically
through use of improper mowing
equipment or by too frequent
and/or close mowing.
Where to Get Help
For assistance in planning and es-
tablishing treatment- on -critical ero-
sion areas with permanent ground
cover on your farm, contact your
Soil Conservation Service.
For more details, see SCS Conservation Practice Standard 342-11: Critical Area Planting.
All programs and services of the Soil Conservation Service are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, se
�
age, religion, marital status, or handicap.
October, 1992

a.
•
Op -it y
Use Arem
1-oca�e Aehc,n -ib
5° PAC, be i9,r hft
Ae we area.
�oca�e he0.v� use
oer+le S)ope
��5 aYca is
I n �ead soo4 �d rr1a� be �
l2eeJeJ'
'�'u�n oTT 7��+- � �•
f ac tih►� �7 ra55 p' I4z"
M t it
IS"Up c.,,j%ev4- I>�e Use Afev,
�r1 toRo -t
All Practices Shown are Installed
IZ w Oe
Q"1C8��
3
1A
+er ill t7ei7e� pas✓e
Dr,) Lor
bD' - Low ., Area
�PW'c�'� • l+c.
ScpLE
r " loo'
5CS-ENG-313A REV 8-75

•i
Prismoidal Volume Results
Original Surface Model:
or
Final Surface Model:
pad
Cut Compaction Factor:
0.00
Fill Compaction Factor:
0100
Raw Cut Volume:
1688.77 cu yd
Compacted Cut Volume:
0.00 cu yd
Total Cut Volume:
1688.77 cu yd
Raw Fill Volume:
708 09 cu d
Compacted Fill Volume: 0.00 cu yd y TBM - 1000.00
Total Fill Volume: 708.09 cu yd Top of Wall near
Water Tank
Drainage Area Into Waste Pond
Roof's or Diversions will Divert
Clean Water Around Barns
Area = 19,700 sq f t-,
Feed Bias
Drainage Pipe maybe
required to pipe runoff
from around feed bins
Fitt area to divert water
in front of Milking Parlor -
xi
Tay
Power Pol
000.00 -
9 95 000,70 10
0D
I
� r99dJ
V
998. 3
995.50
98,
1010
0
1000
------Culvert
24' Diameter
L.50 40' Length
lean Water Diversion
11 Side Slopes - 3:1
1005 50 0 50 100 150
Scate 1" = 50'
Stanley Stikeleather Farm
Iredell County, North Carolina
New Freestall Barn
Plan View
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Dato
Designee SCg 3-03 A-'°"°°8
rdle
DAM, SCB 3-03 1
Traced Dnr" Fad Name:
stikeleather

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 18, 2003
Stanley Stikeleather
Stanley Farm
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490021
Stanley Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Stanley Stikeleather:
,- In accordance with your request for expansion received on August 4, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to
1 , ,you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Stanley Stikeleather authorizing the increase of animal
capacity with no expanst` �oftli ct'aniiilal t a, llec_tion, treatment, storage and,land application
system in accordance with General Permit AW02 0000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this systemincluding,,but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Stanley Dairy, located iniIredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 360 dairy animals, comprised of the following: 250 milk cows, 40 dry cows,
40 bred heifers, and 30 young heifers, and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004 and shall hereby void COC
number AWC490021 dated May 1, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to
operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit,
the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required
monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this
COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be
completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Prior to the above -approved expansion, Section IRC of the Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
shall be appropriately signed and maintained with the facility's paperwork for review by Regional Office
staff.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property,
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http,/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/100/. post -consumer paper

4/
a
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any'
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. •A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff maybe reached 704-663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permii gl contac uhSherman at (9 ! 9) 733-5083 ext..529.
3a
Sincerely;
a
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc; (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
eMoomsville=Regional=Office; Water_Quality-Section`( - AWMP)
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490021
NDPU Files
11C OM. OF EMARORMENT
WD NATI'Pt' gE80t1RCE8
MOORES%'- 'AL OFFIIE
AUG 2 2 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
STANLEY STIKELEATHER
STANLEY DAIRY
159 NO=GHAM CIRCLE
STATESVILLE NC 28625
A090WA
IT 0
4;12
En}T
NCDFWNRAR-CUS
NORTH CAROLIJFD&WPM1 �!atI'{j*egAL CFFIOR
ENVIRONMENT AN NATuFPL,,RSOI IAGE
li
February 19, 2001 ; f E B 2 2 2001
i
rr 1;+'f,.i11" '
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490021
Stanley Dairy .
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
'S orage"and Application Stem
Iredell County b - ca
n
In accordance with your application received on December 20, 2000, we are forwarding_ this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Stanley Stikeleather, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with' General
Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Stanley Dairy, located in Iredell County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 135 milk cows; 35 dry cows; 30 heifers; 30 calves; and the
application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Please pay
particular attention to Permit Condition II. 10., regarding removal of trees, shrubs an other'woody debris
on storage pond embankments.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animas above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. 1
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC490021
Stanley Dairy
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Theresa Nartea at [phone] ext. 375.
Surely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Iredell County Health Department
Mooresville -Regional -Office; Water_QiialitTSection]
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

a ,
State of North Carolina
ODepartment of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
f\t (THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
' �Vv eral Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
wing questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
drft2eview the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
P P
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
t° 1.1 Facility Name: Stanley Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Stanley Stikeleather
1.3 Mailing address: 159 Nottingham Circle
City, State: Statesville NC Zip: 28625
Telephone Number (include area code): [phone] or 6890
1.4 County where facility is located: Iredell
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Hwy. 70 East -- 3MD LEFT on to Bell Farm Rd. SR 2316.
APPROXIMATELY 2 MI ON RIGHT. TURN BY RED BARN.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name, (if different from Land Owner): NA
1.7 Lessee's I Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 1/1/1971
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): NA
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 49 (county number); 21 (facility number).-'
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy
135- Certified Design Capacity %
(See/Amendment)
Is the above information correct? 0 yes; 0 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Tvpe of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals ' Type of Poultry No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 ` 49 - 21
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:

.y
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 72.7 : Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 65
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 1
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100'of any of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
NA YES or NO (please circle one)
NA
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? NA
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal;waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior_ to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations. '
The CAWMP most include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every Iand application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 49 - 21
A licants Initials
.S' % ,.S-
S

i°
Facility Number: 49 - 21
Facility Name: Stanley Dairy
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
�. ✓ �► ram•
MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS.
SFIOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION -OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]' :..
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 49 - 21

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number 49 21 Facility Name Stanley Dairy
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for 230 Date of Certification
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking
135
Dry cows
35
Heifers
30
Calves
30
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS 230 **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and' certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
Only the cows being milked were counted in the orli dial certification.
The total number of animals on the farm has not changed.
Amended Certification (only needed is the Incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this ?wu are certifying that the animal waste management system ai this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Numbed
Farm ownerlappHc
Signature jg' Date 30 zaekod
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature Date
Technical Specialist
Signature Date
Phone Number ( ` OV) 03 `~ t� b
N.C. DIVISION OFWATER QUALITY
NON -DISCHARGE PERMn-MG UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER,
RAL.EIGH. NORTH CAROLINA, 27699-1617

- Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please Evoe or print all information (lint doei not require a sl1^:lturC!
E.cistirtQ ,. or- .:' Netiti or ., .. Es ended..:: ( lease circle one) -
' General Information: RECEIVED
Name of Farm: SI`a I z y t r' - ' t�eit't i� y -- z/ _
r _. - 11 047Z— 7aye
Owrie.(s) Name: 5Y �� Sfi�[t? ��� er Phone No.
�'Yfaiiing Address: 'n G°i c/e fM 4umiyr1�.swyu�
Brif
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: , r-eoG�a�
Latitude and Longitude: 3S '/7 RO 1 80 `f K O0 Integrator:
Please attach a copv of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names. directions. milepost. ex.): 64 e�-of^.r7ta �eas„i�� � 1�/9�(- en _rye/� /�•rr.+� �_
Ooeration Descriotion:
Ttipe of Swine NO. ofAnimals
ZI Wean to Feeder
Z Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
:5 Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
• Gilts
• Boars
Type of Poultry
G Laver
3 Pullets
No. of Animals
l'vpe of Cattle svo. o ".ani„tals
Z Dairy /3
J Beef
Other Type of livestock. '� trynber of Anbnals:
Co"s-j 30 ye/)vferS
30 fa tZDo /6. J,,
Acreage available for Application: _7°7- 17 Required Acreage: b T
Number of La,00ns 1 Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: /yS 71/ Cubic Feet (f )
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES orCRO) (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
,i,,ie eiaM#it as se at Ma's,r##a.�i�ik#�ie�#i,dex#��!„i+,rt+n#nrteri!t �aa+koa#,k,Its[t�!t#,ins,:,�i!tir+i+,fa#�MiF,i+#M�i.M�i.s,. ie sa iexk,�#�4 �, is*�*WM�Ky+sa �:
Owner / ;Mana;er Agreement
I (we) verify drat all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage System or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Envirunmcmtal Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there mast be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state tither directly through a man -matte
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that anv modificadon
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in [and ownership requires written notification to DENT or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner S-/J
Signature:
Date: 1
Name of `ianager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date: =
A' C -- august 1. L997

Technica•Z Specialist Certification h
L. As a technical specialist designated by the -North Carolina Soil and Water Conser:ation Commission pursuant to l_:
N'CAC 6i= .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste mana,gernem system for the Farm named above has an animal waste
manaQeute:tt=`pEsn: that. mCets or exceeds standards and soecitications of the Division of Environntental Manageme,It
(DENT) as specified, in 13A NCAC '_'H.0? 17 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) andlor the
North Car6ana� Stiil41,d Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15.E NCAC 2110217 and 1: a NCAC 6c .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may,srgwe;ii _q;cg4CI�ation (SD. SI. WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only terrify pare for which the: are
technically competent-i .
II. CertifIcation o, f Design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate &ox
:D Exi tins facility without retr tit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: stort=?e capahilitV cnasistem xich waste utiliz.16Ilk
requirements. 1
V New, expanded or retrofitted facility_ (SD)
Animal waste 'storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 1-g r'r•x _ le,-)Wt4y
Affiliation VY,019 Yf e 5 Date Wort: Completed: 3 -24, 97
Address (Agent • �4 / WIrte set ,rt�/�.,:1/c , �'. a 477 Phone i`;o.:_S"7�3 -� 7G/
Signature: Date: /;z -
B) Land Application Site (WITP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers): adequate amount of land For waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):La r'r-v Heuer/x.
affiliation u5b44/9(1s Date Work Completed: �- a�'-97
Address (Aaeney): 2v t t.,Ja .- .S? ier. 'Ile, /V C a8'677 _Phone No.:
Signature:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check rite appropriate box
...1 FjLdjisv without exterior lots (SD or WliP or RC)
:5is facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Date: 9f
Facility with exterior to (RC)
Methods to mininuze the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry
Mtlliadon (.lfM_ //Rods _ Date «'ori:COmplz.zd: 3.Z�_ 97
address (Agency a e / Lv ale, .ff fii?fC1"✓il��� Pht)ne No. i7 3
Signature: Data:/z-iD- Ft
.46WC -• Au"u,t 1. llv,

D). Aimlication and Handling Equipment
Check the appr-opHare box
LZf Existing nr expanding facility with cxisting waste application euuinment (NVU? or 1)
Animal waste applicatiun equipment specified in the plan has been zither field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design chars and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required' by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hvdraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedult: for timing of aociications has been
established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are c ,ntained as part of
the plan).
Zi Ve,.v. exvnnded_ or esistiag facili v without existing waste apolicatinn eoninmem ror-irra�- irriV.don. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjusment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
`etv. erpZndeg or xigdGg acility without a ij;drig wit application equipment tiu land ;prendin,_nQj j in.�
r v i 'Q 'n'n (WUP or i)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has bean selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
"contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Z G r -r e rix
Affiliation uSy q - lVied S Date Work Completed:
Address (Agee�nccy): -9 / 4-0 6r- LT. Phone No.: X7 3 -G 7G /
Signature:
_. °t a't't:, ?—rtEt= Date: it - v - 9�
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. _'Mortality Management and Emergency .action Plan (SD
Sf. NVUF. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste yianagement Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Nfanaeement Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Boot the
Nlortality Nlanazemem Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): La rr!g Men.i�
Affiliation 61S,OR -Al(!S Date Work Completed: 1 z -,10 - 9fr
Address (A ency): z� / lNA,� j::{ .ffa'1`�fYe N, C —Phone No.:
Sionature:
/z-ie-r,
V
F) Written Notice of Yew or Expanding Farm All 4
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
a. 1996. If the facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or Iast
expanded
I (eve) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCOS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners nodfed is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Si -nature:
Name of Manager (if different from owrie ):
Date:
Si -nature: Date:
A%vC A.ugust 1. 1997 3

111. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
tie:•. e.c anded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or a -teed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no cerrifcarion is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L a ►'
r-i K
Affiliation Li 51M — /V eC S - I Date
Address
Sienatun
B) Land Apolication Site (W P)
Check the appropriate box
Work Completed: 12 - /d - 7e'
Phone -No.: P3 -- 67G /
Date: /Z-/G- 9a'
The cropping system'is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monfhlday!}ear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wastentilizadon plan.
Q also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): La r"r- ei1 ri,
Affiliation U 5 Z>J - /1/,QC ' Date Work Completed: % 7- 2f' "17 .
Address (Agency,: d?o IN u '� Phone No.: F73- e.74 /
Signature: Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in 111. B
above has been checked. A//p
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DEN[ a verification of completion
from a TechniLzal Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (%ve)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
" f
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
J
Signature -
Date:
A%VC -- Au_ust t. 1997 4

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
acility with exte'rior loci
victlwds to minimize the run off of pollutant+% from lounging and heav use 7xcai ha• ,- bC_a init:Iled as ,ipCLltfec!
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): r- Le_o d Nix
affiliation U 5 DA - N e C S Date Wor.- Completed: /Z. -/0- yy
address (Agency ): ao I Weer 7�aicfL, /�.e N, C . 'Phone No.: f7-4- 674. /
Signature: c,i� Date:, iz ie - Ft
D) Aoolication and Handling E uioment Installation (W P or I)
Chec.t the appropriare blocs
k: ?Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is c:: site and read.• for use:
calibration and adjusttrient materials have been provided to the owners and are eumained'as part of the plan.
-J animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but die owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plant: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjusmient guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
.1 Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on ,site and installed by (monthlday/year); Here is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �-G rr� #,e-d►-;)c
Affiliation u SAA - A4 (I 5 Date Work Completed: 7^ z - 9 7
Address (Agency): a01 t-u/ �e viAL C • Phone No.: 3 -b 74 /
Signature: Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked. 4
I (we) terrify that i (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DELI a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date spet:itied in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of liana;er (if different from owner):
Signature: - Date:
E) _Odor Control., Insect Control and Mortality Manazement (SD. SI. WL'P. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operadonal. The
mortality management'system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation- U 5vM-1VIf C' 5 � Date
Address ( gency): db/
aiUnsture:
AWC -- Augus[ 1. 1997
Wart: Completed: /-I-- /d - FL
Phone No.:
Date: 1 z -/a-

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environments, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, SIC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Manacement Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
WC .august 1. 1997 6

ShavUey SVLk�,z�- Dai*y
Iredell County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
135 milk cows
35 dry cows
30 heifers
30 calves
Total = 230
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and 'Water Conservation District
December ,8, 2000

AATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 4wyf
CONSERVATION PLAN
*P
Owner Stanley DairyOgrator Stanley Stikeleather
County I r e d e l l .. State N Date
Approximate acres Approximate scale
Cooperating with Conservation Distrfc
" Plan Identification Photo number
F Assisted by USDA Natural Resouross Conservation Service
General Location Map
EXIT
q�1• ! ',� O s.► Cep m '� = v^ W '� A j �v
WOOTEN fib L.
'� a 4.- 7A A GROVE 21
Xt7N ' f3TNUT
9.
$;
MIS. SCH.
rn
JAW
I ' V1 zl92
a ;, s0 I
IEW 9 w +
IVAYLNllhjf
O ` FRLEr
p y�R M+f� ` T M OEW RR�
F R AS %93 NWAY DR.
1C I I _ �.1r.r 4 CRE
173
`'� i cc W WEST MAVEEN lr pR R s ; •',
E S2 XIT�� E7uTi53 64 '' MOCKSy`LE 0: EFFIE�o-Y�y rYa ° t RD
x=T !r�I i ���;.T a 3� :F ; MIC! R. $Rf
a R � S�
1 •ILOC11tt r[h lii KE�LLAR
Z 4
an y
.-. -� - , v •/• ;, '`!• EIuy �� ;. `�•..! 1.�' , -r. �. - r._Dai►fSTAS
i
GLTSO
2_
91
64
lk A9p� c
I[1•L6N A. L:E•
P I d S-
y a N
90 rARMW .w
}� rM1Mr' R COOL °a
64 i DO a °,NS � 3m W4rS)DLr
n� 3 ti
EXIT 499
GR" eRr ` a
9 W000 s c I
70 EXrT49A
�y ! 1 ,a �� ax goo
70 ►=
70 ` r
1g / M t &,� STET
Aun
5!
MAT4 �.�� _
J f. aN 1 1• �� E��e • ,
1 OGNTRTCUB. > Afe
Dun
err
q N1
Q 77
4 �n
flf A ,� ~ 1 1I� 0000 e7Nl i.� ❑
e on
ta��tRtF4 `' fs4 Rh coati
c`x, . . � 0fivna •. +..... cry

r
�dp-: ge, Jise Aee,\
�otahc n -,
50�. l�c�
beVio,.hea H Se
i
+-� a''eoi o.. aer4��e sjape
ik oil
s ,
1p
;n, Dad Saul o�+d� 1►'°�� �e
E
Or44',A if aeedeJ .
r
17. f;ppw
C,on&.reie��
9',< tl]3'•
All Practices Shown are instal'Zed
i &. S A-
MS 414 Ir-
Sw -F. ! ztio 1
If ei -fetes
f'er i n ye i f s Pas414+le
Gress . F;1-fie.• -- - _'•d ;
r �
VCR ww t 1}e userAreo�
��- too
D
(v0 _ 11 ,(a�,,,qt Area
S#arr! S*-ke eathe.Y OQ ;r/�
9. 0 Court 1 NaY+ i.clYaj �n4
5CALE t . P!an ,Qw 1
l `rIDO� 4sfv Mang eftnQr1+
- U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
VA
SOM CONSERVATION SERVICE
o....... •--- _-----1------- -_ •�Dote
APpraved
T... - - -- ----
j ,a. ---------- --------
----------..
Traced ............... .._. .w ara.rr»
a..a.r. ......
_......._._._...__._...:: z
SCS-ENG-313A REV 8-75

5NR

r
W
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
11-27-2000
This plan has been prepared for:
Stanley Dairy
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Knottingham Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
704-872-7248
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr.
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
201 Water Street
Statesville, NC 28677
704-873-6761
Develo r Signature
Type of Plan! Nitrogen Only with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
y
Signature (manager or producer)
/.z./ /tom/ •tea a
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: z-�
Technical Specialist Signature
Date
964521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed; 11-27-2000 Cover Page i

f
I.S. DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTURE NC-CPA-1
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE Rev. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
lame Ctarlll= T)airy Addressham sNGZips
Pull
umber and
res if irrigated
o
Farm Boundary .
Tract
473
Field or Land Use Boundary - �-
`•
field Acreogs . 320 Ac•
1
2.5
Cropland
Field Number
IA
5.5
Dairy Lounging area
2
6.2
Cropland
Private Road +•�
2.1
8.2'
Cropland — Irrigated
Public Road .
2.2
8.2
Cropland — Irrigated
Iluildings, houses . ■
3
7.2
Cropland -
Perenaiol Slreaa • .. .
3.3
5.8
Cropland - Irrigated
�~
3.4A
1.5
Cropland — Irrigated
InlumFllehi Stream .
3.4B
1.5
Cropland — Irrigated
Wgetal Iva wolerror
3AC
3.2
Cropland — Irrigated
3.5A
1.7
Cropland — Irrigated
EXISTING PUNNED
3.513
3.6
Cropland — Irrigated
4
8.0
Pastureland
Fence-----�'
e When existing lenses are coebined with other
5,
3.3
Pastureland
symbols, they oar be shown as tallow
6
6.7
Pastureland
Fenn along bath side
of road--s--�•—s— � ,�1
7
2.0
Hay land
fence clung one side
al di Ich .----x-^—----'T—
Fence to be removed.
Ditcd to be removed ,•,p�-..g�
Tract
314
Terrace r• . ,_ T-1 _ -- 1-2
Diverrionie .
D-1 D-2
1
2.5
Hay land
all
Ths his re resent blocks; the errors
npuunt sills
Drainage dilch.
,.frame
01
(open drain)
Tile Drain
L
1.0
Hay land
Dot and Reservoir . c:
2
7.0
Cropland
Field Border.--•---•—--•^—•--
Flrebreak . . —r--F----F---�•F--
Tract
W2
Spring and Trough. `�
4.5
Excavated PII,
Lagoon
1
I
Cropland
gHolding
on
N1Control
5lruracrure •---�'��
Field or land use boundary and field number Inay be shown in rcd.
Water features may be shown in blue.

wu.
SOL k. '-
19

}i3pi3 F (loins sheet 38)

7�1
(D
0

11
Narrative
The Nutrient Management Plan was orginally completed in 1997 and is updated to incooperate a new
irrigation plan.
Animal Waste from confinement areas for 135 dairy cows, 35 dry cows, 30 heilfers and 30 calves are
ultilized in this plan. Dairy and Dry Cow confinement waste is stored in a Waste Storage Pond as a Slurry
and spread by irrigation. The Heilfer and Calf confinement waste are handled as solids by collecting from
sheds, watering and feeding areas and spread broadcast on non irrigated field areas. Sufficient land is
available to adquately spread all animal waste generated on this farm. Poultry houses on this farm are used
for farm storage.
Please refer to the included irrigation plan by Gra-Mac Distributing Co. for waste irrigation application
information,
All waste spreading and waste irrigation will be recorded as support information for future planning for
waste utiliation as well as future agency reviews. Forms are including in this folder for recording
spreading and irrigation.
There is not sufficient N produced from the animal waste to meet all the crop and forage needs. Additional
fertilization will be needed. Soil test and waste sample test results will be required to balance out the
additional nutrient needs of the crops being grown.
The N will be utilized by growing Corn for silage and Small Grain for silage on the cropland fields and
forage on Tall fesuce pasture and hayland. The planting window for corn will be 4/1- 4/30 and small grain
10115-11115. Cropland will be no -tilled for all crops.
All needed cropland, hayland, and pastureland practices are established.
Results from waste sample testing for the past three years show an average of 4.4 lbs of N per 1000 gal, of
waste slurry and 3.9 lbs. of N per ton of waste solids. These quantities sampled include rain water
collected from concrete areas and saturating outside solids.
Field soil test show an improvement over the last three years, with the current year report showing all the
sampled fields with excellent ph and nutrient levels.
Preview Database Version 1.0. Date Printed: 12-11-2000 Narrative Page 1

Support Information for User Defined Sources
The dairy animals on this farm are not totally confined. Adjustments are needed to come up with a reliable
amount of waste material to be spread and to combine all sources of dairy waste handled as a slurry, as
well as sources handled dry.
U8 Dairy Milk and Dry Slurry
The following calutations define the Dairy waste slurry produced per head, stored in the waste storage
pond and irrigated on to cropland.
135 Dairy milk cows confined 80% of the time producing 7749 gal./head/year of waste = 836892 gal./year
35 Dairy dry cows confined 10% of the time producing 7749 gal./head/year of waste = 27122.5 gal. /year
Dairy milk cows with 836892 gal./year + Dairy dry cows with 27122.5 gal./year = 864013.5 gal./ year
U9 Dairy Heilfer and Calf Solids
The following calutations define the Dry Dairy Waste produced per head and collected from sheds,
waterers and feeding areas field spreading on non irrigated areas
30 Dairy heilfers confined 35% of the time producing 12 tons/head/year of waste =126 tons/year
30 Dairy calves confined 75% of the time producing 4.1 tons/head/year of waste = 92.4 tons/year
Dairy heilfer with 126 ton/year + Dairy calves wth 92.4 ton/year = 218.4 tons total dry waste/year.
Preview Database Version 1.0, Date Printed: 12-08-2000 Narrative Page 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U9
Dairy Heilfer and Calf Solids waste generated 218.40 tons/year by a 60
animal Dairy Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
939
Incorporated
1245
Injected
NIA
1Eqjated
NIA
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
12589
U8
Dairy Milk and Dry Slurry waste generated 864,013 galslyear by a 170
animal Dairy Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 270 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
8558
Incorporated
11670
Injected
13226
Irrigated
7780
Actual PAN Applied
Year. 1
11248
Notes;
In `source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
The following minimum criteria must be met in order for a plan to use a User Defined Source to determine
the total pounds of PAN in lieu of NRCS Standards:
1. Recommended standard procedures for collecting the waste samples to be analyzed must be followed,
2. The samples must be analyzed either at the NCDA Waste Analysis Laboratory or at a private lab. The
analysis reports must be available.
3. Records of annual volumes of lagoon liquid applied must be available.
4. A minimum of 3 years of records of both nutrient concentrations and annual liquid volumes must be used
to determine the farm averages. A minimum of three samples (one per quarter with seasonal variation)
must be collected annually -for analysis. For dairys with waste storage ponds, the minimum annual sample
number is two.
5. Extreme sample analysis values should not be used to determine the averages. From the standards
$64521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-27-2000 Source Page 1

database based on 1,403 data points, one statistical standard deviation from the mean deviates 48% for
swine lagoon liquid nitrogen. Therefore, any value used to calculate the 3-year farm average N
concentration that lies outside of the range of the mean + or - 48% should not be used to calculate the farm
average.
If, at a minimum, these criteria have been met for the most recent 3-year period, then the waste utilization
plan may be revised indicating a change in the total PAN on the farm as determined from site specific data,
864521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-27-2000 Source Page 2

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being. grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on -each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility, .
the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning
period_
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to
balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal
waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Tout
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
AppGc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrias
Req'd
Carom.
Fat
Nubian
Applied
Rs.
(lbs/A)
N
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
I N
N
WA
1000
zWA
tone
1000 ZRIS
tuns
--owl
1
U9
Appling
1.0
1.0
escue Hey
4.9
Tons
811-7/31
212
0
❑
Broad.
212
0.0
49.3
0.0
49.3
--owl
2
U9
Appling
7.0
7.0
mall Grain, Silage
10.2
Tons
9115-3/31
114
0
0
Broad.
114
0.0
26.5
0.0
195.6
-owl
2
U9
AppRag
7.0
7.0
S'
22.3
Tons
2115-6/30
243
0
0
Broad
243
0.0
56.5
0.0
395.6
0002
1
U9
Appling
4.5
4.5
map Cram, Silage
10.2
Tans
9/15-3/31
114
0
0
Broad
114
0.0
26.5
0.0
119,3
OD02
1
U9
Appling
4.5
4.5
silaEE
22.3
Tons
2/15-6/30
243
0
0
Broad.
243
0.0
56.5
0.0
254.3
--4314
l
U9
lin
2.5
2.5
crcue Ha
4.9
Tans
8/1-7/31
217
0
0
Broad
217
0.0
50.5
0.0
126.2
8473
1
U9
CECIL
2 55
2.5
map Gram, sila
9.8
Tons
9115-3/31
109
0
0
Broad
109
0.0
25.4
0.0
63.4
8473
1
U9
CECIL
2.5
2.5
Sila
20.5
Tons
2/15�/30
223
0
0
)3toad
Z23
0.0
S1.9
0.0
129.6
8473
2
U9
CECIL
6.2
6.2
mall lira n, Sil
9.8
Tons
9115-3/31
109
D
0
Broad
109
D.0
25.4
0.0
157.2
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-01-2000 WUT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tray
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
f Ass
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rogd
Comm.
Fat
Nutrient.
Applied
Res,
(ibs/A)
I N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs/A
1000
A
tans
1000 Zals
tans
8473
2
U9
CECIL
6.21
6.2
Silage
20.5
Tans
2/15-6/30
223
01
0
Broad
2231
0.0
51.9
0.0
321.5
8473
2.1
U8
CECIL
8.2
8.2
mall Crain. Silage
9.8
Tans
9/15-3/31
109
4
0
hrig,
109
12.1
0.0
98.8
0.0
8473
2.1
U8
CF.CIL
8.2
8.2
Silaigp
20.5
Tons
2/15.6130
223
0
0
bTi&
223
24.8
0.0
202.1
0.0
8473
2,2
U8
CECIL
8.2
8.2
mall Grain, SiJaW
9.8
Tons
9115-3131
109
0
0
hrig
109
12.1
0.0
98.8
0.0
8473
2.2
US
CECIL
8.2
8.2
Silago
20.5
Tons
2/15-6130
223
0
0
Irrip,
223
24.8
0.0
202.1
0.4
8473
3
U9
CECIL
7.2
7.2
mall Grain. Silage
9.4
Tans
9/15-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.0
24.2
0.0
174.1
8473
3
U9
CECIL
7.2
7.2
Silage
19.5
Tans
2115-6130
213
D
0
Broad
213
0.0
49.51
0.0
356.6
8473
3.3
US
CECIL
5.8
5.8
mall Gram, Sile
11.0
Tans
9/15-3131
122
0
0
hrig.
122
13.5
0,0
79.0
0.0
8473
3.3
U$
CECIL
5.8
5.8
Silage
23.0
Tans
2115-6/30
251
0
0
Ini
251
27.9
0.0
I62,5
0.0.
8473
3.4A
US
CECIL
1.5
1.5
mall Gram S'
9.4
Tons
9/15-3/31
104
0
0
Irrig,
104
11.6
0.0
17.0
0.0
8473
3.4A
U8
CECIL
1.5
1.5
Silage
19.5
Tans
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Inig,
213
23.7
0.0
34.9
0.0
8473
3.413
U8
CECIL
1.5
1.5
mall Gram. Mage
9.4
Tans
9115-3/31
104
0
0
hi-i&
104
11.6
0.0
16.7
0.0
8473
3.413
US
CECIL
1.5
1.5
Silage
19.5
Tons
2/15-6130
213
0
0
Irrig.
213
23.7
0.0
34.3
0.0
8473
3.4C
US
CECIL
3.2
3.2
mall Gram, Silage
9.4
Tons
9/15-3/31
104
0
0
Irrig,
I04
11.6
0,01
37.1
0.0
8473
3.4C
U8
CECIL
3.2
3.2
Silage
19.5
Tans
2115#130
213
0
0
Iffig,
213
23.7
0.0
75.9
0.0
9473
3.5A
US
CECIL
1.7
1.7
mall Grain, Silage
9.4
Tons
9/15-3131
104
0
0
Irrig,
104
11.6
0.0
19.2
0.0
8473
3.5A
U8
CECIL
1.7
1.7
Silage
19.5
Tans
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irri&
213
23.7
0.0
39.3
0.0
8473
3.513
U$
CECIL
3.6
3.6
mall Grain, Sila
9.9
Tans
9115-3/31
109
0
0
hri
109
12A
0.0
43.2
0.0
8473
3.SB
US
CECIL
3.6
3.6
, Silage20.5
Tons
V15-6130
223
0
0
Irri
223'
24.8
0.0
'98.4
0.0
8473
4
U9
CECIL
6.5
6.5
escvc Pasture
3.8
Tons
811-7/31
129
0
0
Broad.
128
0.0
29.8
0.0
193.5
8473
5
U9
CECIL
3.3
3.3
escue Pasture
4.0
Tans
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad
133
0.0
30.9
0.0
102.1
8473
6
U9
CECIL
6.7
6.0
ware PasGare
4.0
Tans
8/1-7131
l33
0
0
Broad
133
0.0
30.9
0.0
207.2
8473
7
U9
CECIL
2.0
2.0
came Ha
4.4
Tons
8/1-713 i
198
0
0
Broad
198
0.0
46.0
0.0
92.1
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,249
Total Produced, 1000 p1lons
964.-
Balance. 1000 ollons
1 -385
Manure Solids
Total Aglied, tons
2,928
Taal Produced, tons
1 218
Balance, tons
1 -2 709
Notes: 1. In the trail oohurnr, symbol - means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 12-01-2000 WUT Page 2
0
E

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the fallowing table. Infiltration
rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate
that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be
applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that
each field may receive in any one application evem.
Irrintion Anolication Factors
Tract
Ficid
sail series
A"licatica Rate
"ro IMU
Application Amount
inofiea
8473
2.1
CECIL
0.60
8473
2.2
CECIL
8473
3.3
CECIL
U . 60
8473
13AA
CECIL
0.38
8473
3.413
CECIL
8473
3.4C
CECIL
0.38
0.60
8473
3.3A
CECIL
0,381040
8473
3.5i3
CECIL
864521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed. 11-27-2000 IAF Page 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated, The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,
this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available
storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceedsthe design storage volume
of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste
utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Dairy Milk and Dry Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
411
270
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity
1
1
138
1
2
110
1
3
79
1
4
270
1
5
239
1
6
209
1
7
178
1
8
147
1
9
270
1
10
239
1
11
209
1
12
178
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
864521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-27-2000 Capacity Page 1

0 0
Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
86452I Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-27-2000 Specification Page 1

•
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right -of --ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
Waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
... ._._._......_..... .------........... _._......- - ......._._.__._....._...._._...._....._.._._.._.._..--.----_..---....----------..........._._._._._..........._._..__.................... ._._........._....._............_...._..........
8645.21 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-27-2000 . Specification Page 2

16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets;
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
864521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-27-2000 Specification Page 3

0 i
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
864521 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 11-27-2000 Specification Page 4

IRRIGATION LAYOUT
. Tract 8473
FEELD �2
1250'
---_—__ 1250------
-- - --
k
' S, +
i PLLL i
s5 —� ---�i 48
' i60'
+ 5A
— 350, r - 140` i 460'
t - 45 I , 4C
4.21
L—
�� FIELD =j
PIPE IS 6" SDR 21 GP,SKET,--_D PVC
?1PE WfLLRTION DEPTH = 36" - 42"
TB = THZ ,T BLOCK .
Scale 16=�90,
BUFFER
,
I
I
�n
--�
5tikeleather Dairy
r
Stanley Stikeleather
159 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 25625
Pipe key
-- s- Pfi2Q8 G..k.tad PVC Pwa
2" PR Z@8 59 PVC Ppa
Sprinkler / Valve key
rGa-�w -R.W IEr ON" SL-y PwV .✓Lweo
6' FIQVa 61r I Get. Va>-
1Wd-ent • P-= Reyes Va" 5'
H60wi • Tlr-fti er, VsH 6'
Tr.-P41 Voi,s
i -sv 0r—, V4�,a
j -Hater SuIvL
Gra—Mac Distributing Co
=0 NC Hwy. am N
MOckssill% NC 27oze
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]W
Designed by: Jason Graham
Data 9-Z7-pp

h
EXHIDIT D-I
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: County: Tra_rlP_71
Address: 152 Nnl-ringharl fared- -
Statesville NC 28625 Date: 9-27-00
Telephone: 704-$72-724$__
TABLE Z - Field Specifications k
s
Fleldl
Nuwbtr
Approximate
Rlaxlmuml
Useable Size
ofFleld7
(acres)
SoUType
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Mazlmnm
Application
Rate3
(Whr)
11ta:Ineum; I
Appticetlon k
per Irrigation 1
Cycle3
(Inches) Comments
3
Cecil
Corn Silage & SG Silage
.4
.6
,See attached 111up.
?'I'oinl field acreage milts required buflcr areas. '.
31tefer to F1. C. Irrigation Guide, Field MCC Technical Guide, Section 11 G. Annual application must slot exceed 111c agronomic rates for the soil and cr011 used.
F
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

i
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
EXHMrr D-2
Make, Model and. Type of Equipment:
Long 1560 Traveler_ w/ 1250' of 3.75 ID PE hose & Nelson SR150 Gun w/ 1.1„ Taper Bore Noz
Field Not
and
I iydrant Not
'Travel
Speed
(tllniin)
Application
Rate
(inft)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (A) Length (ft)
Wetted
Diameter
(fett)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Are
(inches) Gun (psi) Reel i) Pattern;
ppr� Pull App. Pull
Commrnls Gallons
2.1
3.3
.34
260
1250
360
1.1
70
107
320
379 Min. 111.805
260
1250
360
1.1
70
107
320
379 111,805
.39
260
860
360
1.1
70
107
320
261 76.995
11 4A
5.8
.34
150
360
210
1.1
70
107
180
62 18.290
3.4B
5.8
.38
240
140
360
1_1
70
107
180
24 7,080
I 4C
.3-4
240
460
360
1.1
70
107
320
139 41-005
3 5A
5.8
.38
260
160
360
1.,1
70
107
180
28 6,260
3.5B
3.3
.3
260
480
360
1.1
70
107
320
145 42.775
1Ttl fin. 41 5
23.6 Hours Gallons
ISee atluched ntnl).
}Shnty sepantle enlrics for each hydrant location in each field.
-{Use the folltswirtg abbreviations for variotts arc pallerns: F (lull circle), TQ (Iltree quarters). IT (two thirds), li (half circle). I' (one third), Q (one quarter)
May also use degrees of arc.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996
•
11

}
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
EXHIBIT D-3
Hake, Model and Type of Equipment: '
Field Nul
and
Line Not
Number of
Hydrants
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
Ilydrant Spacing (ft)
Alung Between
Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
(in/hr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating`, Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
(inches) a Gun (psi) @ H drant r)
Comments
1 See attached mnp.
2Show separate entries for each pipeline with Hydrants in cacti field.
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996
0

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irri ation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
295
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
132
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
Hose Length (feet)
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
None
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
PTO
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
65
t
TABLE S - Thntst Block Specifications
Designer mnv tirovide thrust block details on separate sheet
LOCATION
TI MUST UL0CK
AREA (sq. ft.)
900 Bend
9
Dead End
9
Tee
fl drants
9
Drains
9
.See USDA-1411CS Held Off ice Technical Guide, Section [V, Practice Code 430-DD.
EXHIBIT DA
NRCS, NC
JUKE, 1996
0
i

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
.Name: Jason Graham
Company: Gra-Mac Distributing Company_ _
Address: 2310 NC Hwy 801 N Mo_cksyille NC 27028
Phone: [phone]__ ____ ^ ,
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION-,
llte following details of design and materials trust accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline roittes, thntst block locations and butter areas where applicable.
3. Assumptions and computations for detennining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
•1, SUnRtS and/or CaICtllEttiotuS used for delennining application rates.
5. computations used to determine [lie size ofthrrust blocks and ilhustratious of alt thrust block configurations required in the system.
O. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Mtutuufactttrer's specifications for the irrigation pile and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Witter Conveyance,
N.C. Field Oflice TCCInlliCal Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-01).
R. '11t: infonnation required by this fonn are the tnininuun requirements, It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as
appropriate.
9. lurigatimu piIVS should not he installed in lagoon or storage pond embank -meats without the approval of tine designer.
NOTE: A IatlTcr strip 25 feet wide or wider trust be maiulanned between the limits of the irrigation system and all peremual
streams and surface waters per NC Stniutes.
11
MRCS, NC
JUKE, 1996

4
a Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designerisupplier,
hiclude procedures such as start-up, shut-dovhi, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
See attached sheets for additional specification and operation information.
i
.x
EXH®rt D-
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996
•

TravInAkne space
Ncw or OiLing Itlevi
E d Table
Total
Acres
fo
�7F

GRA-MAID, 11311STRUIBIU111ING UOMIAY
Design — Sales — Seri,ice
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
�IALCP110Nf_: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
t3301 VDA-3232
(3361 996-3000
NC, TOLL FRICE F-B00-422-3560
Specifications Sheet
Stikeleather Data
2310 NC HWY, 001 N
MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 2702©
1. Wettable acres under traveler coverage is ± 33.5 acres.
2. Traveler is a Long 1560 with 1.250' of 3.75" ID PE hose and a Nelson SR1.50
gum with a 1.1" Taper_ Bore nozzle.
3. Nelson SR150 gun performance with a 1.1" taper bore nozzle is 295 GPM. 360'
diameter @ 70 PSI.
4. Friction loss in 1250' of 3.3" ID PE hose at 295 GPM is 37 PSI.
5. Friction Toss in 6" SDR21. 200# pressure rated gasketed PVC pipe at 295 GPM
is .27/100'.
6. Liquid velocity in 6" SDR21. 200#*pressure rated gasketed PVC pipe at 295 GPM
is 3.4'/Sec.
7. Maximum pressure requirement is as follows:
Gun 70 PSI
1250' of 3.75" ID PE hose 37 PSI
2440' of 6" SDR21 PVC pipe 7 PSI
Elevation ± 30' 13 PSI
Misc. 5 PSI
132 PSI
305 Head Feet
S. Application Rare is as follows:
96.3 x GPM 360
3.14 x .9 radius X ARC
96.3 x 295 360
3.14 x(.9(180))2 x 3 00 W 28409
x 1.125 W .38 In/Hr

G R A - ,N'1l A (.,0.N'1111 Y
Design --- Saks --- Sari -ice
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSIEMS
I.L.EM40NF: ADVANCF EXCHANGE
4 .13 b, Cl'N1-.'1?'.
43361 998.3©OO
NC TOLL FREF 1.000.•1:.: .' 7-r"
Specifications Sheet
Stikeleather Dairy
Page 2
9. System travel speeds are as follows:
3200 Arc
19.3 x GPM
Lane x Application Depth
19.3 x 295 5694 39.5 In/Min
240 x .6 77� _
= 3.3 Ft/Alin
= 198 Ft/Hr
WOCK VILLt, PI. C. 270ZO
1800 Arc
32no _ 1.77 x 198 = 350.5 Ft/Hr
1800
_ 5.8 Ft/Min .
10. Pump is a Gorman -Rupp MB4A20A-B Slurry PTO pump.
U . Pump maximums are # 150 PSI and •+. 1000 GPM. -
12. Pump horsepower requirement for 295 GPM at 132 PSI will be approximately 65 HP.

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
1336) 990-3232
13361 998-3600
NC TOLL FREE 1.800-A22.3560
Operations Guide
StikeleaCher Dairy
System Srart--Up
2310 NC HWY. 801 N
MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
1. Attach traveler to hydrant and slowly (C2 MPH) pull out gun cart.
2. Attach pump to system. Open main line gate valve slowly.
3. Prime pump with tractor at low RP11.
4. Open pump discharge valve slowly.
5. Allow all air to purge from the system.
b. Raise tractor RPM until designed pressure is met. (132 PSI)
7. Start traveler engine and allow to warm.
8. Fngage traveler drive and set r4 designed speed.
9. Observe the system to make sure the system is operating properly. (Arc of gun.
travel speed. system pressure)
System Shia t'- Down
1. At the end of the travel pull, the traveler will automatically stop the -
engine.
2. Lower tractor RPM slowly.
3. Close the pump discharge valve slowly.
4.'Disengare the tractor PTO.
5. Close the system main line valve.
G. Reopen the pump discharge •salve to relieve any pressure that may be present.
7. Remove discharge nose from pump and system.
8. Store pump.
System Flushing
L. Flushing of the system lines will need to take place after the complete pump
cycle. or if the system is riot going to be used for several days.

0
GRA-MAC
DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design --- Sales -- Service
COMPUTE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
43361 998-3232
43361 898-3800
NC TOLL FREE 1-800.422.3560
Operations Guide
SlAkCIOZIHIC17 Di-Ifry
Page 2
Flushing Cont.
2310 NC HWY. 801 N
MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
2. System will require a minimum of approximately 6000 gallons of clean water
to flush properly. More would be better.
3. Run the clean water until the system runs clear. (The traveler will need
to be'placed at hydrant #5 and moved to hydrant ll3'to flush line entirely)
Winterization
1. Open all drains in the system. (Only after flushing?)
2. Make sure pump discharge gate valve is left open.
3. After, system has drained, close the pipeline drain valves.
4. Make sure traveler gun cart has been lowered to the ground and the drain
plug opened.
5. Spray lubricant 0,A)--40) into pump suction intake. Rotate PTO shaft so that
impeller and pump housing are coated. This will help to prevent corrosion
during the winter.
6. If gas is left in the traveler engine. treat with a stabilizer. (Sta-Bi1)
Maintenance
1. Do not operate the system if any part is damaged.
2. Replace any worn or damaged parts as soon as possible.
3, Grease hydrant stems anually.
General
1. Do not operate the system -under the following conditions:
Wind greater than 10 MPFT
Rainy weather
.Just after a rain event
In freezing weather or it the pround is frozen

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE 2310 NC HWY. 801 N
1336) 998-3232 MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
13361 998-3800
NC TOLL FREE 1•BOO-422.3560
Operations Guide
SLi.keleathea= Dairy
Page 3
General Cont.
2. Follow waste utilization plan as it is written.
3. Haul as much of the solids as possible and/or agitate frequently. (System
will work much better the more liquid the material is.)
4. Make sure that no waste is running from the fields. If it is running. speed
'the traveler up to a speed at which runoff stops.
5. If runoff occurs. have a safety plan in place.
6. Never open any drain valves unless the system has been flushed.

tie, bseAt-ep, •
ro o. JA of ✓a c CL^a' �e
be to o e.y�t 5e
a +lea .
1- o c. �t h emn use
r
csen+le slope
71
.fin
,a
At
n 'Tod
1 �r.g� i Reedea . ,Y
` — \)J a t 5
0�+
16, S RG
Ps4W>-c
sco +. / zoo 16
N- e; -Perms
F;1�,1�er in tTei� Qas✓e
J + IO. - .. _- Free fF's � - - '�• � r.--
: I ✓. .IS"Cfvtoo-
e 1Areo�
ff
17.0
All -Practices Shown are Installed 3
Orn... ..ate
Sfay)1 $f; ke eathe'r1 Da r
- .rreJe Ceu11 Aloyth AYdina
SCALE Plan
WcksFe Mans ey,.,e + S' s%y►,+
- _ -- U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
�k to„ , SOIL CONSERVATION SE#Ajg
1 - Urn
DOW.......
Tie.. _
Tr.�w...............----------- I O�y.+r+r
_ e..crr --......
�._.._._._...
- SCS-ENG-313A REV 8-75

77
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN'
CATEGORY EXAMPLES ACTION
CONTACTS ,
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff — 704-878-3180
full or partial loss of a lagoon wall
property, contact 911 or Sheriff's Dept.
resulting in a release of waste
-
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-873-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
5353
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor— Church B r o t h e r
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
Grading, Inc.
-
contain the waste on the farm
104-876-1615
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
4. Contact the technical specialist who
certified the lagoon
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or Emergency Management at 704-663-
from base or sidewalls of lagoon;
1699
waste discharging from
underground tiles x-
Tech. Spec. -- 704-873-6761, ext. 3
2_ Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Failure to immediately address
these may result in complete
reinforce weak area of structure until a
technical specialist can assess situation
Local Contractor -Church Brothers
Grading, ---Inc.
structural failure
1
704-87 6-1615
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat" category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single storm events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker
Fj
i

S
Lagoon Overflow
* Add soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam
* Pump wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate
* Stop all additional flow to the
lagoon (waterers)
* Call a pumping contractor
* Make sure no surface water
is entering lagoon
Runoff From Waste
Application Field
* Immediately stop waste
application
* Create a temporary diversion
or berm to contain the waste
on the field
.,
* Incorporate waste to reduce
further runoff
Leakage From Waste
Distribution System
" Stop recycle (flushing
system) pump
* Stop irrigation pump
* Close valves to eliminate
further discharge
* Separate pipes to create an
air gap and stop flow
Leakage From Base or
Sidewall of Lagoon
* Dig a small well or ditch to
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
back into lagoon
* If holes are caused by
burrowing animals, trap or
remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type
soil
* Other holes may be likewise
temporarily plugged with clay
soil
i

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects_ _ _ _ _ Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids 9 Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
19 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at '
discharge t �_
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids 0 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative . Decaying vegetation V Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along,
watert edge on inipoundmentt perimeter.
Feeders • Feed spillage IV Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the k
accumulation of decaying %yrastage
1W Clean up spillage on a routine'tiWs (e.g.,7- to 10
day interval. during summer, 15 to lb -day interval:
L. 7._ �: during winter) .
.''. ;�,.• .Eta —9r. t . . i ..•. _, _ _ - .
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMPs to Control Insects Site SpEcific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed
Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storageareas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewerk grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
Er Inspect for and remove or breakup accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed stora e-as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal
'Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Q' Maintain fence rows and filter stripd around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes
7- to 10-day interval during summer; IS to 30-day
interval during winter) where manin,e is loaded for
,land application or disposal', .
Rr Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
f9"_ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handlin areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Vegetative or wooded buffers
Recommended best management practices
Nl� Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered 91 J Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces ® Promote drying with proper ventilation
l9r Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine IM Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial l( Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial ❑ Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial ❑ Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface decomposition ❑ Tank covers
• Mixing while filling ❑ Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
d' Agitate only prior to manure removal
N( Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial ❑ Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition 91 Remove solids regularly
Mixing while tilling
• Agitation when emptyin
Manure, slung, or - . Agitation when spreading ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader 0 Volatile gas emissions Pr Wash residual manure from spreader after use
Outlets fie' Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMUC - November 11, 1996, page I
P
0

Dairy Farm waste Nianagement Odor* control cneddist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor -Site Specific Practices
[]ncoWNLI manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surtaccs
R(
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
V
Proven bio!2jLical additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Uutside drain • Agitation during wastewater 54 Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
bosses
Litt stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater iT Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission Mr Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
17 Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
Fr Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation Fr Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles . Wind drift 00 Minimum recommended operating procedure
fV Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
n Pump from second -stage lagoon
Ir Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AI< OC - November 11, 1996, page 2
0
0

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site S ecific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition ir Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water • Improper drainage 9 Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
tarin access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
I-agoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manurc and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Plies; PRO 107, 1995 Contcrence Proceedings
Ah10C - November 11. 1996, page 3
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU---BAE
NCSU---BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BA17
Florida Cooperative Extension
0

•
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
rr - ❑ -...� the case -,of- dead poultry only, placing in a -'disposal pit- of"a, size -and- design
approved by the Department of ,Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: STANLEY STIKELEATHER
.,._.. -JOB CLASS -•IV
DAIRY SIZE: 135 MILK HERD
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
Mac Ed ton, Civil En I eer Technician
C
APPROVED BY: , -k, p
DATE:

, WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Management Components and Problems
135 cows are milked on Mr. Stikeleather's farm.
Manure, milking parlor wash water and polluted runoff are
stored in a Waste Storage Pond constructed in the mid
1980's. Cow numbers have increased since the pond was
constructed. Manure is irrigated with an irrigation system
purchased by the landowner.
35 dry cows are kept in a lot near the barn and are fed
--• -•hay on -the lot. Dry.cows are -also fed silage on milk herd -,
feed area once a day. Milk cows have free access to a
lounging area during dry days.
Day old to 800 lb heifers are confined to barns, sheds
and lots near the milking parlor. Polluted runoff from
heifer feedlots flows directly into a stream. 800 to 1200
lb•.heifers are pastured near the barn and are fed next to a
stream.
Runoff from trench silo's flows into stream with little
filtering.
II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A waste storage pond is located near the feedlot and
freestall barn. Waste from the milk herd and dry cows will
be collected in the waste storage pond. The waste storage
pond volume (storage period) is the main factor which
determines the management required to prevent an illegal
discharge. Manure should not be applied to land that is
frozen, snow covered, or saturated. The storage period will
be determined based on current cow numbers and drainage
area.
Irrigation is used to empty this pond. The irrigation
system will be checked to determine if it meets current__,
standards for spreading manure. Modification will be made
if required.

0 0
B. Heifer Housing
Heifer feeding areas will be changed due to limited
pasture on the farm. Most of cropland (open land) is needed
to irrigate manure from waste storage pond. 16.5 acres of
steep pasture is available for the thirty 800 to 1200 lb
heifers. Mr. Stikeleather plans to change and only feed hay
to large heifer group on a heavy use.area in the pasture.
If silage is fed to this group in the future, other plans
will be needed to control manure and runoff.
The 400 to 800 lb heifer -group will be removed from the
farm. Mr. Stikeleather will rent pasture for this group.
. - Day old to 400 .lb,•heifers will be housed.. in old barns and
sheds on the farm.
C. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage pond to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
D. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Livestock are fenced out of the waste storage pond.
Fencing will be changed to create 100 ft. vegetative filters
below lounging.areas. The filters will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
A stock trail shall be constructed from feedlot -
freestall area to dry cow hay feed area. A heavy use area
will be constructed at dry cow hay feed area. The area
downstream of stock trail and heavy use area shall be
maintained as a vegetative. filter. _ y. -- I - , . - . , _ -
A diversion will be constructed below the silo to
divert silo leachate and runoff from a gully to a diversion.
This will provide approximately 200 ft of filtering.
E. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 270 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Iredell County.
Drainage Area = 12,500 sq ft Surface = 10,000 sq ft
Unsurface = 2,500 sq ft
SURFACE UNSURFACE
= NORMAL RUNOFF- RUNOFF
MONTH RAINFALL °s DEPTH % DEPTH NORMAL EVAP.
JAN. 3.70 50 1.85 20 0.74 1.7
FEB. 3.86 56 2.16 25 0.97 .1.6
MAR. 4.51 55 2.48 24 1.08 3.1
APR. 3.35 56 1.88 25 0.84 3.8
MAY 3.86 57 2.20 23 0.89 3.9
JUN. 4.19 60 2.51 27 1.13 4.4
JUL. 4.70 60 2.82 26 1.22 4.3
AUG. 4.83 61 2.95 31 1.50 3.9
SEP. 3.82 66 2.52 32 1.22 3.2
OCT. 3.44 62 2.13 30 1.03 2.4
NOV. 2.95 55 1.62 25 0.74 1.7
DEC. 3.80 57 2.17 23 0.87 1.7
Try 9 months:
October through June Surface Runoff Depth = 19.0"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 8.29"
.. :� _Surface. Runoff= 19 :00",� *: 10, 000. -sq ft= 15,.833. cuf,t
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 8.29 * 2,500 sq ft = 1,727cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surfaces
33.70 - 24.3 = 9.4" = 0.8 ft/9 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff.=_4.91" _
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.9111 * 12,500 sq ft = 5,115 cuft
12"/ft

4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
S. Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.5 ft
6. Waste Volume
a. Milk Herd
135 milk cows are typically on the lot area
approximately 80% of time. A conservative estimate of
manure collected is 80%.
. Volume = 135 cows * 14 cral/day/cow * 270days * 80%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 54,578 cu ft
b. Dry Cows
35 dry cows spend 10% are on the lot approximately.101;
of the time.
Volume = 35 cows * 14 cral/day/cow * 270 days * 10%
7.48 gal/cu ft
1,769 cu ft
C. Total Volume
54,578 cu ft + 1,769 cu ft = 56,347 cu ft
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 100 gal./day
ii-. 7 -,Tank-..wash-,water , .. �.;, .X. _ 15.0..igal::./,day.
iii. Milk house floor wash water 300 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50 _gal._.1day
500 gal./day
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal*'270 days
= 18,048 cu ft

B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
15,833
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
1,727
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
5,115
cu
ft
4.
Manure
56,347
cu
ft
5.
wash water
18,048
cu
ft
TOTAL
91,955
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
0.8
ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5
ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
Stage
1.5
ft
TOTAL
2.8
ft
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
"AS BUILT" Volume
1.5:T
& 2.1:1
106.8' X 187.2'
60' X 130'
2.1:1
2.3 :1
Volume = 10.2/6[60' *1301+ 96.7'*174.91+ 4(78.4'*152.5))
= 123,312 cu ft
Approximately 31,000 cu ft is available for solids
a-= -- accumulation °and . the, pond will. still have .9. months;„:of
storage. This is OK.
Normal Pump Out Volume =
•15,833• + 1,727 + 56,347 + 18,048 + .8 * 106 * 187
= 107,812 cu ft per 9 months
= 145,747 cu ft per year
= 1,090,000 gal per year
= 40.2 ac-in per year
Maximum pond level
0.5" + 1.5" + 5,115 cu ft/(100' * 1801)
= 2.3' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 2.3 below the top of dam elevation of the pond.
The ---emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.5 foot below
the top of dam elevation.
d, p 0 ve/0w Spwy.

0
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond. The District Conservationist will design all
diversions. Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25
year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible4� by guttering. This applies..mostly_-tor-any. new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy -Use Areas and
Filter areas
The, -stock trails and heavy use areas consist of 9" of
compacted ABC stone over a specified type of filter cloth.
The stock trail and heavy use areas shall be fenced. Runoff
from these areas and lounging areas will be directed across
well maintained grass sod. Vegetated filters shall be
maintained between lounging areas and drainage ways.
Filters shall be 100 ft wide. Swells or diversions shall be
constructed and maintained along fence lines to kick water
into filters at frequent intervals.
A. Milk Cows
Milk Cows have access to lounging area located behind
.-freestall,.bar-ns,.7 �, Vegetat-ive filters:, -;.at least_10,0' wide: ,, Z
will be maintained around the lounging areas.

B. Dry Cow Group
35 dry cows are located next to the milk cow lounging
area. Dry cows are fed hay it the lot. Vegetated filters
will be established below feed areas and lounging areas. A
one wire electric fence will be constructed around a draw
near mid point of lounging area to provide additional filter
area in the drainage way. A heavy use area (60' X 601) will
be constructed in dry cow pasture to feed hay. A 150' X
12.5' stock trail will be constructed from the freestall
barn to the heavy use area. Cattle are fed silage daily in
the freestall barn. A clean water drainage way located
directly behind the freestall barn will be.removed.from.the
dry cow lounging area. A water tank will be installed on
concrete lot for dry cows.
See waste Utilization Plan for waste Produced and Nitrogen
Produced

OWY W. M.Y:iR.NA/Yx9.NNM aN.:/p: :A�.I: :dI:4NN•N:A•a�C.Al,.fi:W'A,.�A: :a„s;�Tlv.. 'v'Y.:s::AI:♦V.ww.:MA►.A�.s.M:4i1�A►:P'4i0'iP.f�iOre►.�:voYYe `?.�rY,
l
f
Stanley Stikeleather Dairy
Iredell County, North Carolina
OPERATION
And
r
MAINTENANCE PLAN
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
135 milk cows
35 dry cows 1p
30 heifers
J
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
r
December 8, 2000
a
vairrsrraysiairirirrrir.eiirisirisuruisuivuisrr,:,n�risrsrr�rirrrrriruisrsrsrrirrrrririsr�irrririsrririsi�rrrrili �.r.+.�r•�.,y�rur .�, r r 1 r

C&RATIQN and MAINTENANO - PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
FARM SKETCH
III

AERATION and MAINTENANNE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FARM SKETCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .III
SYSTEM OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV
1. WASTE STORAGE POND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . 3-4
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS AND FILTER AREAS. . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. GENERAL COMMENTS. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ..6-7
7. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(END)
9. WASTE SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . (END)
II

ORATION and MAINTENANS PLAN
...........
.0200 Certification Plan
FARM SKETCH
III

go', , bse Aeea, 4t
OL-%a
J-UCA�t llew-n Use-
4;
be `-2 " '_�
OV4 j
jr4*,A i-F jeeJeJ,
Y%k,ft CAF -f^%4%-
Mt
L7 ` �lr ;; .5-41
17-0 cD
I 1p.!57 &
RS44M
F. 14p-,- 1 -.
i�
18 "CPP C.1 w
P- U5e AcAreao.
sz, ;PC I Z. S
SCALE
Boa -t. izuo 11,
e i T-,',es
4ey- in Yeife.- Pas4-4ye-
Siqylle 6-hke:jeatf e%- DO;?
rr e4 e �l Ckintli AIDY+�7. i,,l Ina
p
WQ Sfv Ma nq _9eftfte" +
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
bore
------------------------ — d -- ------
-S c . la.*
TIIY
--- -------------------------
7rwod ............... .. ......... . sow w"-ftft
Chem"
SCS-ENG-313A REV 8-75

J I

TION and MAINTEN
PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following
components:
1. WASTE STORAGE PONDS
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM (IRRIGATION)
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS AND FILTER AREAS
5. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
6. WASTE UTILIZATION
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots into the WASTE STORAGE
POND (WSP). All contaminated water (wash, parlor and runoff) that
drains from waste covered concrete will be collected in WSP. Concrete
curbs and extra ramps will be installed to divert lot runoff into the
waste storage pond. All waste contained in WSP will be land applied
at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to provide
270 days storage for the solid wastes produced by 135 head milking
herd. See the Waste Utilization Plan for information on irrigation
design and loading rates.
This Animal Waste Management System is
of Animal Waste Contaminates to surface
(25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm,
discharge regulations.
IV
designed to prevent discharge
waters from the twenty-five
as required under the Non -

OPEFt`TION and MAINTEMKNCE PLAN
uzuu uer-Li -ri cari on P i an
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot
runoff and waste water from the milk barn for a 270 day period.
A permanent marker will need to be set indicating the level of
storage available prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour
storm capacity. The pond should be emptied before the level
reaches 2.3 ft. below the planned elevation top of the dam or 0.8
ft. below the spillway elevation. The WASTE STORAGE POND
consists of an earthen dam, clay liner, and concrete chutes for
discharging contaminated water into the WSP.
OPERATION
A. WASTE STORAGE POND
This pond will store solid manure slurry collected from the
milking parlor and free stall lot areas. It will also store
polluted runoff and milking parlor waste water. It will store
waste for 270 days. It is located more than 100 feet from the
nearest well and is not closer than 350 feet from any residence
other than the owner or his tenants.
t

MAINTENANCE
vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and
reseeded as needed to maintain a vigorous stand. The dam should
be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing
operations must take place only when the soil on the dam is dry,
and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less than
four(4) inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage
should be reported to the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation
District office. Any trees or woody growth should be removed by
cutting and also removing the stumps and smoothing to re-
establish vegetation.
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of
using the existing irrigation system presently being used with
the noted modifications. The 1.0 inch nozzle is recommended.
Follow the tables in the WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN that identify the
application rate and amount. System is designed to utilize
irrigation as the main delivery source of nutrients to the
fields. The system will be used when crop and field conditions
are suitable.
2

OPERATION and MAINTEU&NCE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
OPERATION
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid
level reaching the full storage level marker in the structure.
When the liquids level in the WSP reaches the marker, liquids
must be removed by pumping from the structure, either into the
irrigation system or to a spreader tank for land application.
The marker elevation is 0.8 feet below the emergency spillway
elevation.
Do not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion.
Do not irrigate on frozen or saturated soils. Irrigate only
until soil is near saturation point.
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly
agitate the waste in the Storage Pond. If application equipment
(irrigation or spreader) is owned consult owners manuals for
recommended operational procedures. Waste will be sampled and
tested for nutrient content each time the pond is emptied.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receive waste application should have soil tested
annually. It is recommended that waste and soil sample results
be used in conjunction with each other.
OVERVIEW
The CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM consists of first
excluding to the fullest extent possible CLEAN WATER. Other
measures to be utilized are identified below and detail amounts,
quantities and specifications are included in the cost share
contract.
A.
A diversion will be installed below the calf barn and below the
entrance to the silos. It should outlet into a rock lined
channel that will be needed to stabilize the outlet.
3

OPE
CE PLAN
The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically
and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand. It is
essential that neither vehicles nor livestock be allowed to
create travel lanes within the diversion. The diversion should
be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The
diversion may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and
mowing operations must take place only when - the soils are dry,
and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less
than four (4) inches. If sedimentation has reduced the capacity
of the channel, contact the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation
District for technical assistance in correcting this problem.
B.
Guttering will be used on any new construction since owner
believes that installation will be to difficult to install and
maintain on the existing buildings.
C.
All heavy use areas will consist of 9" or more of compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. All heavy use areas
will be fenced. Any significant drainage area above these areas
should be diverted away from these areas. Runoff from these areas
and lounging areas will be directed across well maintained grass
sods. Heavy use areas and lounging areas will be located to
provide the maximum grass filter possible. See VEGETATED BUFFERS
for maintenance. These filters will be at least 100 ft. wide.
Swells or broad based dips will be constructed and maintained
along fence lines to direct water into filters at frequent
intervals.
D.
The dry cow lounging area will have a new stock trail and heavy
use area installed. Before this trail is constructed an
additional 18 inch CPP will be installed or connected to the
existing 12 inch concrete pipe. This will allow clean water to
flow under the stock trail and into the grass filter area. The
grass filter below the trail and heavy use area will serve to
collect waste and utilize the nutrients. The trail will be used
by the dry cows to access the freestalls for feeding when the
milk cows are on the lounging lot.
E.
The milk cows are kept in free stalls and lounging areas. They
travel between the concrete free stalls and the lounging lot on a
stock trail. The concrete part of the stock trail will have a
concrete curb installed. This lane can then be scraped as the
free stall area is scraped and the manure will be collected in
the waste storage pond.
4

ORE
E
G.
The grassed waterway on the west end of the milking herd lounging
area will be established. It will be constructed according to a
designed specification to intercept runoff water and prevent it
from draining across the stock trail.
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID
COLLECTION SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or
replace as needed. The Lumber Pipe Cradle and Bent Support
components shall be inspected seasonally for rot and mechanical
• damage and repaired or replaced as needed. Annually inspect
the pipe coating, and clean as needed.
• 55, +MVE
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two fold purpose, they filter
sediment from exposed feeding and lounging areas. Their width is
based on slope of land and proximity to streams. These areas can
be control grazed or mowed for hay to prevent unwanted growth.
These buffers are used in lieu of storage structures. Proper
maintenance of these buffers must be followed or a storage
structure will be required.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and
erosion within the buffer. If grazing does take place caution
should be practiced to prevent overgrazing. Grass should be a
minimum of six (6) inches. These buffers should have at least
80% ground cover. Specified width of 100 feet must be
maintained. Swells or broad based dips will be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to direct water into filters at
frequent intervals. See the plan map for location of the
vegetated buffers.
5

an
Pipmarp-WIP 0A•
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed according to NRCS standard
382 (Fencing), where recommended by the technical specialists.
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed at locations as indicated
on plan map. Channelized flow from the lounging areas, concrete
feed alleys and hay feed areas will be stopped. Fencing may be
changed to remove cattle from steep draws and below concentrated
feed areas. See the plan map sketch for proper identification of
these areas. It will also be needed along the stock trail to
get the dry cows from the free stall barn to the lounging area.
Another location that fence will be needed will be below the
heavy use area in the large heifer pasture.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical
damage or rot. If fencing wire becomes loose, re -tighten to
original specifications. If fence posts are rotted or damaged in
any way, replace damaged posts with a post which meets the
original specifications.
GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
By signing the Waste Utilization Plan the landowner agrees to
apply the collected waste according to the terms of this
agreement.
Landowner agrees to apply the components of the N.C. Agricultural
Cost Share contract.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides
so that desirable vegetation is not adversely affected. It is a
violation of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted
by its labeling.
6

REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District if
repairs or major modifications are required for any of the
components of this Waste Management System.
Upon completion of all items involved in this plan, your
operation will be certifiable. This plan is for only the number
of animals and acres listed in this plan. Please notify the
TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS) that signed your Waste Utilization Plan
and Certification form if operational changes take place.
7

Attachment 5
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM
FOR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE USE ONLY
EOFM-MC:EOFSTATE ARCHAEOLOGY/DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
STATE SITE NUMBER:
1. SITE NAME(S): ��o n les, 5 � 6 )c4&uy 's rIli 3
2. INSTITUTION: USD --SCS 3. DATE RECORDED:
4. RECORDER:
S. PROJECT NAME: User -,
6. COUNTY: ror1 !_ 7. USGS QUAD MAP: 4P s,,.i1 l2 I~ OL S�
S. DIRECTIONS TO SITE: �51� Z3 'ex.
9. DESCRIBE TOPOGRAPHY: Qn lI i
10. SOIL MAP UNIT: C�,.P
- -11. DESCRIBE,VEGETATION/VISIBELrrY: v
12. SITE DESCRIPTIONIDIMENSIONS: /DD' X. 00'
13. LIST ARTIFACTS: Novae — — —
R
14. CULTURAL CONIPONENTS: (check) PREHISTORIC: HISTORIC
15. OWNER AND/OR TENANT; INFORMANT: — a
Pam.
ADDRESS: (-iy,, P_ .�,. �4 S.JiJJI 1P H C Za�-�-7
PHONE: (7n't) IB7 Z - 2224 $
> > > ATTACH PHOTOCOPY OF THE SECTION OF USGS SHOWING SITE LOCATION < < <

1 � �
v1 J ,r
�:",{ 1� �`-• lad
eat �.6 � r �:r+I �� f '� �����•� ' �� 0 '
_ r�,,tr�
I
999
1
P

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Stanley Stikeleather
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
A��
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 30, 1997
Subject;-,DWQ.Animal Waste.Operations4Site.
a Inspection Report
Stanley Dairy, Facility #: 49-21
Iredell County, NC . .
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on September 29, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson
of this Office. Mr. Johnson had the following observations:
- The area adjacent to the stream in the dry cow lot needs the buffer improved.
- Trees and shrubs on the storage ponds needs to be cut.
- The lot in front of the facility needs improvements.
As discussed, these are to be address by the certified farm plan.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone],
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 North Main Street, CN��� FAX [phone]U0
Mooresville, Nertin Caroline 28115 An Ecluci Opoortur•iiy/Ali,rmative Action Employer
Voice 704ti63-1699 W% recydedr 100% pest -consumer paper

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
EI'DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
JOLUoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Fop
Facility Number
,registered U Certified © Applied for Permit ❑ Permitted
Farm Name: De:i ti
of DSWC„ review 0 Other
Dale of Inspection i
Time of Inspection 3 '3 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Countv:..................�..�..:�.A.'�1..........................,.......,..
Y -
Owner Name: ' :. s- ` , Phone No: .��. �e............... .. ..... .. :�.r-....................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:.............. .................................... Phone No; .7T...........
I f
Mailing Address: ....67,'P ..II%X�. i.h � ........ .t`'r �............ .... '] � :5,�?.�.�1.........................................
fe...�?..
OnsiteRepresentative: ....................`...............................`.......................................................... Integrator:...,..........................,.......................................................
Certified Operator.....».1.�.4/..........1.1�.~£.� 4�1^................. Operator Certification Number:......................
Location of Farm:
Tit Lam. .......�-A.1........ !1,..... ... C ........ ..............w.,....rzla7.7... .... ~....3.l. ru.......... ��......4n ...........5.......... n.� .Y?...............
G.L -af l.....1
Latitude a 01 44 Longitude ' 06 44
Design Current
Design Current
Design' Current', '
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
JE1 Layer
airy
:2 ZS"
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer I
I
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds I0Subsurface Drains Present ❑ l.atnon Area I0Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? AYes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yps No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Ifdischar-e is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. [lot il'y DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Wu
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes P�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes RNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes 6Io
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes `(� No
7/25/97 ✓
Continued on hack

Facility Number: —
�8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 9No
Structures [.a oath lioldin Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):........................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes )Q No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 'Ef�io
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? XYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Yes ❑ No
W'aste Application Ale
��p,14. Is there physical of over application? El Yes Q�No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
II/! or15. Crop type ....1........ 1�1�11.4.,1 .......... r�-11.�15.................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 0-Yes ❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
1P No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19,
is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1!�No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
D No'violations or deficiencies.we're-noted-dur.ing this.visit.-.You.will re'cei've,no further
correspondence about this'.visit:-
Comments (refer to'question #): Explain: any�YES answers`and/or any; recommendations
Use dtrawings,of facility to`better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
C6rcJ % h�P s it4 � 7rzw�enveh�
�eeS Sin i�t l l�� CPA 5 i —6 to �ii � yt�2�5 kp -
S
other continents.
7/25/97
4.
Reviewer/Inspector Name )/; ..,w:Wi is lnA eKiel A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: r 9

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Stanley Stikeieather
Stanley Dairy
256 Nottingham Circle
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Mr. Stikeleather:
lffllawA
,&746ja
[DaHNF;Z
N.C. DEPT. 01r
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTM
& NATURAL REISO)UJ2(,'S
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DEC 17 1996
Facility: Stanley Dairy
Facility ID #: 49-21 DIVISION OF E#Vii;l)UENTAL MANACERINT
Iredell County IIOORESKLE RECIOAAL OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, most complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt at 919/733-0026,
ince�gl
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System 1W y0 Voice 919-733-W26 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission � An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 ISM T11111 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.`s -2!
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: /a�7 .. 1995
Time: 2 'ao
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County: d�j Integrator Phone:
967 '?
On Site Representative:.S�Adu %;&W&(Phone: -
Physical -Address/Location: Pies I FPrnti izd .
Type p try-- a,iryy gn p ty•_Number of Animals on Site:
T e of Operation: Cattl�e,�/Desi Ca aci �
Latitude:$0 " y3 ' oy" Longitude: 3, ° y7' 3� " Elevation: : a Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (EsIor No Actual Freeboard: L Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or f9 Was any erosion observed? Yes oaN
Is adequate land available for spray? ( or No Is the cover crop adequate? Y�e or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? (�r No
100 Feet from Wells? Cesor No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or !&o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
S,r-„III
Additional Comments:
Inspector Nam Signature c
cc: Facility Assessment Unit