20050991 Ver 1_Approval Letter_20050606

Ecosystem
PROGRAM
May 12, 2006
V@[RUW4
MAY 3 0 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
>i,'EIA 0 Al@ STCMMATE-R BRAM-8
John Condrey, County Manager
Rutherford County
289 West Main Street
Rutherford, NC 28139
Project: Rutherford 74 Corporate Center
County: Rutherford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAiti1A permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit
(Sq. Ft.)
(Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Broad 0 0 0 0 239 0 0 0
03050105
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone I at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Chris Mankoff at [phone].
incerely,
?K
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
An-ie Pennock, USACE - Asheville
Kevin Barnett, DWQ Regional Office - Asheville
File
Restores... F ... Prot" Oar State
ern
ICDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
01
i
r
r
>A ?
C3
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 18, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0991
Rutherford County
John W. Condrey, County Manager
Rutherford County
289 North Main Street
Rytherfordton, NC 28139
Subject Property: Rutherford 74 Corporate Center
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Condrey:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 0.09 acres of wetlands and 231 linear feet
of streams for the purpose of property access road at the subject property, as described
within your application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on June 7,
2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered
by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The Certification (s)
allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other
required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge regulations. Also,
this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in
15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in
the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet http://h2o.enr stata.nc usincvvetlands
NorthCarolina
.rtiatijrrrllJ
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 501,16 Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
c,ulllerLUIU /4 totporate tenter:
Page 2 of 6
July 13, 2005
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Plan Location or Reference
Approved Units
Stream 231 (feet) Culvert including headwalls and
downstream stabilization
Wetlands 0.09 acres Forested Wetland fill
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
i?uuicuuiu i f k"WPOCale l.enier:
Page 3 of 6
July 18, 2005
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through protected stream buffers such
that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream. If this is not
possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered
to remove nitrogen, oil, grease and soap. This may require additional approval
from this Office.
7. Buffer Replanting
Replanting of vegetation within disturbed areas located within 25 feet of the
streambank associated with the culvert installation must be done in accordance
with the attached Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration immediately
following construction.
8. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 50 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard.
9. No Impacts Beyond those in Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or
riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-
construction Notification. All construction activities, including the design,
installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water
quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
a.uaal\.1a Vlu /Y %. ULFJV I ULU k.UIRCL.
Page 4 of 6
July 13, 2005
10. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the
Division of Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and
sedimentation control program, an NPDES General stormwater permit
(NCG010000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued to the project. This
General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or
more acres], full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation
control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are
required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may be found at
http.//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
11. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the
original stream profiles are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained
above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall be designed and
installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of the
streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate
stream grade shall be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner,
the pipes shall be removed and re-installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or
erosion of the stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream
dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern and longitudinal
profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Therefore,
you must provide plans with adequate details that indicate that the current
stability of the stream will be maintained or enhanced. You must receive written
approval from this Office for the above plans before the culvert(s) is installed.
Culvert(s) must be installed according to approved plans.
12. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact Mr. Roger Edwards of the
Asheville Regional Office by phone at 828.296.4500 at least 2 business days
prior of the commencement of construction.
12. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
l\UUICLIULU /•f %-Ulpurale l.en[er:
Page 5 of 6
July 13, 2005
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project.
13. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained
jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure
compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall
be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved
for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web
site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands. The text of the sample deed
notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project.
14.Temporary Fills
All temporary fill and culverts shall be removed and the impacted area returned
to the original grade, including each stream's original cross sectional dimensions,
planform pattern, and longitudinal bed and bed profile after construction is
complete or within 6 months of the establishment of the crossing, which ever is
sooner, and the various sites shall be stabilized with natural woody vegetation
(except for the maintenance areas of permanent utility crossings) and restored to
prevent erosion. If the crossings are not completely removed and restored as
described above within the specified time above, additional written approval from
this Office must be obtained to modify this condition.
15. Compensatory Mitigation Using the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table
below. We understand that you wish to make a payment to the Wetlands
Restoration Fund administered by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been determined by the
DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. Until the EEP
receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem
Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization
Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if you
have any questions concerning payment into a restoration fund. You have one
month from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting
purposes, this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the
Wetlands Restoration Fund to meet the following compensatory mitigation
requirement:
Compensatory Credit Mitigation Required
Stream 231 feet
Wetlands 0.09 acres
L?uuLV?LivLU i'? %.VIPviaX k,UIILCL.
Page 6 of 6
July 1S, 2005
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Mr. Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at 828.296.4657.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.. Director
Division of Water Quality
AWK/khb
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: Jon Hollifield, P.E., Odom, Hollifield & Associates, Engineering
152 East Main Street
Forest City, NC 28043
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Ecosystem Enhancement Program
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Asheville Regional Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 05-0991.Rutherford74CorporateCenterP.GC3402.approval

Iletailst - Detalls2 j Permits and Cert s Cross Refs ?'. Impacts ; tAibgations Fees j Affillabons Events ,Inspections comments ` History
Project Number: 20050991 Version: 1 Status: Issued Last ActionDesc: Projectissued
Project Name: Rutherford 74 Cor porate Center Project Type: Industrial) Commercial/ BuslneE PrimaryCounty: Rutherford
'Event Type Event Date Due Date ! Category I Comment Last Update...ILast Update-
Application received in CO 06107!2005 I R11 Wetland Converted Ev watischeper ..06f2412005 I

4pplicationsent to Region -
06!1312005 - -------- -- w- -
R11 Wetland Converted Er alischeper 0 612 412 0 0 5 1
I
i 0 711 812 0 0 5 kevinbarnelt 0711612005
i
I

<Back
-,'.. Close
3 Events Ready SID: WPEV
Triage Check List
Date: 06/13/05 Project Name: Rutherford 74 Corp Center
DWQ#: 05-0991
County: Rutherford
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 6/7/05 to 8/5/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
T X CCU
152 East Main St.- Forest City, NC 28043 • 828/247-4495 • Fax # [phone]•
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
To: NCDENR - DWQ
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleilzlh, NC 27699-1650
Attn:
We are sending 7 copy (ies) of the following
Shop drawings Prints
Letter
Change Order
Date: 6/l/05
JUN 7 2005
ODA
TEZEr 1P;CH
Plans Specifications
Pay Request _X-Other
I Date I No. I Description
6/1/05 05005 Rutherford 74 Corporate Center - PCN Application Forni
X For approval
For review and comment
Make corrections noted Return for corrections
As requested See remarks below
Remarks: One copy of the "Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation" report compiled by S&ME has been included
as additional infonnation. Seven sets of the complete plans have been included, if needed, to provide details for sewage disposal and
stonnwater controls.
Please contact our office if additional infonnation is required. We appreciate your assistance with this project.
Signed
P"
T
t-S&ME
July 7, 2004
Odom & Associates Engineering, Inc.
152 East Main Street
Forest City, North Carolina 28043
Attention: Mr. Jonathan F. Hollifield, P.E.
Vice President
Reference: Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation
70-Acre Property
U.S. Highway 74 and Old Caroleen Road
Forest City, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
Dear Mr. Hollifield:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME), is pleased to submit the results of the Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters
of the U.S. Delineation recently perforned on the property referenced above. The work was
performed in accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 1357-13808-04-Rev, dated June 17, 2004.
The opinions included in this report are based on the information obtained during the study and
our professional experience. This letter is based on observations made on the date noted and
using the procedures described herein, within the project area outlined in the attached figures.
The project area is an approximate 70-acre tract comprised of portions of two adjoining parcels
(Rutherford County Tax Parcel ID Nos. 1634517 and 1634518), located south of U.S. Highway
74, east of Old Caroleen Road, and west of the Second Broad River in Forest City, Rutherford
County, North Carolina (35a 18'54"N, 81 a 49'26"W -Figure 1). Portions of the parcels
excluded from the project area include that already developed with the Tracker Marine facility
(excluding a small area containing a forlner waste filtering plant and lagoon), and a wooded area
located north of the Second Broad River.
S&ME, Inc. I [phone]
9751 Southern Pine Blvd. [phone] fax
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273-5560 www.smeinc.com
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. July 7, 2004
The approximate location of the project area is depicted by the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), a
portion of the 1993 Forest City, N.C. USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2), and a USDA Soil
Survey Map (Figure 3).
Scope of Services
S&ME's approach to this Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation consisted
of the following four tasks:
Task 1: S&ME Wetlands Professionals visited the site and evaluated the property for conditions
consistent with the definition for jurisdictional wetlands as set forth in the 1987 USACOE Wetland
Delineation Manual. S&ME personnel then identified the jurisdictional limits of the on-site
wetlands and marked the upland/wetland boundaries with sequentially numbered flagging. S&ME
also conducted a field review to locate waters of the U.S. on the subject property. Drainage features
identified during the field review were assessed to determine the jurisdictional status of the channel.
Task 2: Following the delineation, S&ME prepared an Approximate Wetlands and Waters of the
U.S. Map (Figure 4) that details the extent and location of the delineated wetlands and waters of
the U.S. The findings of the delineation are summarized in this written report.
Task 3: Following your review of this report, S&ME will prepare a Request for Jurisdictional
Determination (JD), which will be sent the USACOE in Asheville, North Carolina. In addition,
S&ME will request a site visit with a representative from NCDENR's Asheville Regional office
to receive concurrence with our stream classification calls. The USACOE will review the JD
package, and may wish to schedule an on-site visit to evaluate the delineation. Upon
confirmation of the delineated jurisdictional boundaries, the USACOE will provide a JD
Authorization letter.
Task 4: Following receipt of the JD Authorization letter from the USACOE, the approved
jurisdictional boundaries should be surveyed by a registered land surveyor, retained by the client.
The surveyor should then prepare a map of the delineated boundaries of wetlands and waters of
the U.S. to forward to S&ME for review. S&ME will review the map for completeness, and
necessary changes will be coordinated between S&ME and the surveyor. Once necessary
corrections have been made, S&ME will send copies of the survey to the USACOE for final
written verification.
2
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. ' July 7, 2004
Study Methods
On June 23 and 24, 2004 S&ME wetland professionals conducted a field reconnaissance of the
project area. The purpose of the field reconnaissance was to determine the presence or absence
of jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. The delineation was conducted utilizing
currently accepted methods for wetland determination, as set forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACOE) Manual for Identifying and Delineating Wetland Areas, which states
that under normal circumstances, an area must demonstrate the presence of three components to
be considered jurisdictional: 1) hydrophytic vegetation, 2) hydric soils and 3) wetland hydrology.
Prior to the site visit, S&ME personnel reviewed available supporting information including the
1993 Forest Cites USGS Topographic Quadrangle map; a May 9, 2003 topographic map
identified as the J.C. Cowan Plant Lot Layout, provided by Odom & Associates Engineering
(Odom & Associates); the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Rutherford
County (1993), USDA publication Hydric Soils of the United States (1991), and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) publication National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands
(1988). The purpose of reviewing this supporting information was to characterize drainage, soils
and vegetation in the project area. During the site reconnaissance, S&ME personnel integrated
the information obtained from this supporting documentation with field evaluation to determine
the presence or absence of wetlands and waters of the U.S. in areas in which they were most
likely to be encountered. High probability areas might include areas mapped as having hydric
soils, or soils with inclusions of hydric soils, topographic patterns that are associated with
wetlands, or field observations of hydrophytic plants and wetland hydrology.
Following review of the material referenced above, S&ME personnel visited the project area and
conducted wetland delineation sampling. In accordance with the three component approach to
identifying wetland areas, soils, hydrology and vegetation were simultaneously characterized at
each observation point (sample location). The collected field data were then utilized to conduct
the wetland delineation. When all three components tested positive, a wetland designation was
assigned.
3
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. July 7, 2004
S&ME's scope of work also included assessment of on-site streams in accordance with DWQ
and USACOE guidelines. Streams are drainage features that change from ephemeral (non-
jurisdictional) to intermittent (jurisdictional), to perennial (also jurisdictional) along a gradient or
continuum. An ephemeral stream has flowing water only during and for a short duration after,
precipitation events in a typical year. Ephemeral streams are located above the water table year-
round, and groundwater is not a source of water for this type of drainage feature. Runoff from
rainfall is the primary source of water for stream flow. Ephemeral streams are not jurisdictional.
An intermittent stream has flowing water during certain times of the year, when groundwater
provides water for stream flow. During dry periods, intermittent streams may not have flowing
water. Runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream flow. A perennial
stream has flowing water year-round during a typical year, and exhibits biological, hydrological,
and physical characteristics commonly associated with the continuous conveyance of water. The
water table is located above the streambed for most of the year. Groundwater is the primary
source of water for stream flow, while runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for
perennial stream flow. Both intermittent and perennial streams are jurisdictional, and impacts
thereto require written authorization from the USACOE.
The currently accepted stream assessment method used to distinguish ephemeral channels from
intermittent channels is detailed in the DWQ's Stream Classification For n. This form uses a
numeric classification determined by the results of the stream's geomorphic, hydrologic and
biologic characteristics. Examples of these characteristics include the presence or absence of a
pool/riffle sequence, recent alluvial deposits, periphyton (slimy or spongy-leafy growth of algae
on rocks, logs, etc.) and macrobenthos (small invertebrates that are found mainly around the
stream bottom), etc. With respect to intermittent channels, the USACOE uses a different,
although similar, set of criteria to distinguish unimportant from important channels. The criteria
are set forth in the USACOE's Intermittent Channel Evaluation Form, and include characteristics
such as the presence of fish, shellfish or amphibians, wildlife use and undercut banks. Evaluation
of the on-site streams using the USACOE's Intermittent Channel Evaluation Fomi was only
conducted for non-perennial streams.
4
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. July 7, 2004
Generally, a stream channel is perennial when the following criteria are met: 1) Biological
indicators such as fish, crayfish, amphibians, mussels (clams) or large (multi-year) tadpoles are
present, or; 2) Macrobenthos that require water for entire life cycles are present. These organisms
include, but are not limited to, Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies) or Trichoptera
(caddisflies), or; 3) A numerical value of 30 points is determined from the DWQ stream
classification form.
It is important to note that DWQ makes stream assessment determinations independent of those
made by the USACOE, and accordingly, mitigation required for impacts to the on-site streams
may differ, should the conclusions reached by one agency differ from those reached by the other.
Existing Site Conditions
The project area is comprised primarily of woodland and former farm fields that are currently
overgrown. The wooded areas consist of a mixed pine-hardwoods community typical of those
found in the upper Piedmont. Dominant canopy species include shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata),
loblolly pine (P. taeda), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreunz), white oak (Quercus alba), red
maple (Aces f7ibrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), flowering dogwood (Corms florida)
and hickory (Caiya spp.). Dominant shrub and woody vine species include poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), yellow jasmine (Gelsemiun: sempervirens), greenbriar (Smilax
rohindifolia) and muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia). The herbaceous layer covers less than 20
percent of the ground and is dominated by various grasses.
Typical vegetation within the former farm fields consist of black berry (Rhubus sp.), dog fennel
(Eupatorium capillifolh ni), broomstraw (Andropogon virginicus), black cherry (Prunus
serotina), sweetgum saplings, golden rod (Solidago spp.) and various grasses.
Based on review of the USDA Soil Survey of Rutherford County (Figure 3), Pacolet-Bethlehem
complexes comprise the predominant soil type throughout the project area. The Pacolet series
(Typic Kai-Aiapludults) consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils formed in
5
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. July 7, 2004
material weathered mostly from acid crystalline rocks of the Piedmont uplands. The Bethlehem
series (Typic Kanhapludults) consists of well drained, moderately deep soils found on ridges and
slopes of the upper Piedmont. Bethlehem soils formed in residuum weathered from the high-
grade metamorphic rocks such as sillimanite schist, phyllite schist, and mica schist. Within the
project area, slopes associated with the various Pacolet-Bethlehem complexes range from 2 to
greater than 25 percent. A small portion of the project area located near the northern boundary is
mapped as Buncombe Loamy sand (Typic Udipsamments). Buncombe soils consists of very
deep, excessively drained, sandy soils on nearly level to gently sloping flood plains of the
Piedmont and Coastal Plain. The soil was formed in sandy alluvium washed from residuum of
schist, gneiss, granite, phyllite, and other metamorphic and igneous rocks. Slopes range from 0
to 5 percent.
Delineation Results
Figure 4 (Approximate Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Map) depicts the approximate location
and extent of the jurisdictional boundaries delineated within the project area. Based on S&ME's
assessment of on-site conditions, the following jurisdictional waters were identified on the
project area:
Stream Approximate Length of
ID Perennial Channel (H)
1 1,025
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 280
6 1,255
7 370
8 250
Approximate Length of Total Length of
Intermittent Channel (10 Stream (10
700 1,725
225 225
185 185
165 165
115 395
0 1,255
0 370
0 250
6
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. July 7, 2004
The intermittent portions of the streams identified above were classified as "important" in
accordance with the USACOE's Intermittent Channel Evaluation Form.
The Second Broad River comprises the eastern boundary of the project area. The top bank of the
Second Broad River was flagged only cursorily to ensure numbering continuity with on-site
streams draining into it.
Jurisdictional wetlands within the project area are limited to riparian areas associated with the
streams identified above. The approximate location and extent of these riparian wetland areas is
identified on Figure 4. Cumulatively, the total wetland area on-site likely exceeds 1 acre.
Because the wetlands on the property consist of linear, irregularly-shaped areas associated with
the on-site streams, the total on-site wetland acreage should be considered approximate.
Typical tree species within the riparian wetland areas consist of red maple, box elder (Ater
negundo), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and tulip tree
(Liriodendron tidipifera). Shrub species consist of green ash (Fraxinits pennsylvanica) and privet
(Ligustrum sinense). Typical herbaceous vegetation is comprised of Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), jewel-weed (Impatiens capensis) and giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea). Vines
include poison ivy and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissacs quinquefolia). Photos 5 and 6 depict
typical riparian wetland areas identified within the project area.
Recommendations
The jurisdictional limits should be verified by the USACOE, and the delineated boundaries
surveyed and platted by a registered land surveyor, employed by the client. The surveyor should
establish metes and bounds of the jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the U.S. and tie them,
ultimately, to an established property corner. Upon completion of the final survey, S&ME will
review the map, and recommend changes if necessary, then send the final survey to the
USACOE for final jurisdictional determination.
` Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. July 7, 2004
In the event that future development of the project area will result in impacts to waters or
wetlands of the U.S., appropriate authorization from the USACOE and DWQ should be
obtained.
Impacts to greater than 0.10 acre of wetlands, or to any amount of waters of the U.S. (streams)
require a Nationwide Permit (NWP) from the USACOE. NWT-39, available for industrial,
commercial and residential development from the USACOE, has a threshold of 0.5 acre of
wetlands (greater than 0.10 acre requires mitigation), and up to 300 linear feet of stream with
habitat (aquatically-significant).
In the event that the proposed project-wide impacts exceed these thresholds, an Individual Permit
(IP) must be obtained. An IP is a more difficult and time consuming permit to obtain. An IP
generally requires a public notice to notify federal, state, and local agencies, adjacent property
owners, and the general public of the proposed project, and allows an opportunity for review and
comment or to request a public hearing. The USACOE will evaluate: 1) the relative extent of the
public and private need for the proposed activity; 2) the practicability of using reasonable
alternative locations and methods to accomplish the objective of the proposed activity; and 3) the
extent and permanence of the beneficial and/or detrimental effects that the proposed activity is
likely to have on the public and private uses to which the area is suited.
The typical time frame for obtaining the respective permit types are 2-4 months for a Nationwide
Permit, and 6-12 months for an Individual Permit.
In addition to USACOE approval, certain activities that impact wetlands or waters of the U.S.
require authorization from the State of North Carolina. lnpacts to greater than 0.5 acre of
wetlands or greater than 150 linear feet of stream requires a 401-water quality certification from
DWQ. Placement of fill material within greater than 0.10 acre of wetlands or greater than 3001f
of stream (with habitat for fish and wildlife) requires an Individual Permit from the USACOE,
along with the water quality certification. While isolated waters and wetlands are not regulated
by the USACOE, waters and wetlands, both isolated and adjacent are regulated by DWQ. To
? t
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C. July 7, 2004
avoid obtaining a Water Quality Certification, project-wide impacts to wetlands must be less
than 0.10 acre, and less than 150 linear feet with respect to stream impacts.
Additional site-specific stormwater management requirements may be added at DWQ's
discretion. Site-specific stormwater management shall be designed to remove at least 85 percent
of the total suspended solids (TSS) according to the latest version of DWQ's Stormwater Best
Management Practices manual. Further, in watersheds that are classified as water supply waters
(WS), DWQ requires that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas, and ponds followed
by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version of the NCDENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the stormwater management plan.
The final, written stormwater management plan shall be approved in writing by DWQ's
Wetlands Unit before the impacts specified in the Certification occur. The stormwater facilities
must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, and must be constructed and
operational before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the subject site.
Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act establishes a three-step sequence for mitigating
potential adverse impacts to the aquatic environment associated with impacts to wetlands and
waters - first avoidance, then minimization, and lastly, compensation for unavoidable impacts to
aquatic resources.
Mitigation is required for impacts exceeding 0.10 acre of wetlands or 150 linear feet of perennial
stream. On-site preservation/restoration of stream resources is a possible avenue for mitigation
credit. In addition, the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) or other
Mitigation Banks would provide adequate mitigation for the project. DWQ requires stream
mitigation at a 1:1 ratio for restoration. Wetland impacts will require mitigation of 2:1 from both
DWQ and the USACOE for restoration. Preservation credits can range from 4:1 to 10:1.
9
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C.
S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
July 7, 2004
Acceptable forms of compensatory mitigation are (in order of preference):
Restoration: the return of a degraded or previously impacted stream to a more natural
state, or the re-establishment of wetland hydrology and vegetation in an area where it
previously existed.
Creation: the construction of a wetland or stream in an area where wetlands did not exist
in the recent past.
Enhancement: increasing one or more of the functions of an existing stream or wetland
by manipulation of vegetation or hydrology.
Preservation: protection of streams or wetlands through purchase, donation or
conveyance of a conservation easement to an appropriate govcni vent or non-profit
agency for management.
Each agency prefers that mitigation be "on-site" and "in-kind," meaning that restoration or
creation of similar waters on-site should first be considered. Off-site options, or payment into an
approved mitigation bank, however, are also acceptable when no viable on-site option exists.
The NCEEP currently accepts payments and performs mitigation on behalf of permit applicants.
The NCEEP and the USACOE have established a Memorandum of Understanding that allows
the NCEEP to implement mitigation projects on a case-by-case basis when it is appropriate. The
NCEEP uses the following fee schedule to determine how much a permit applicant must pay into
the WRF to fulfill their compensatory mitigation requirements. The fee is based on the acres and
types of compensatory mitigation specified in the approved certifications issued by DWQ and
permits or authorizations issued by the USACOE.
Tyne of surface water or vvetland
Surface waters other than wetlands
Non-riparian wetlands
Riparian wetlands
Salt water wetlands
Cost
5200 per linear foot of stream
$12,000 per acre
$24,000 per acre
S 120,000 per acre
10
• r
Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Delineation
70-Acre Property, Forest City, N.C.
S&ME Project No. 1357-04-340
July 7, 2004
We hope that this letter addresses any concerns you may have regarding jurisdictional areas located
within the project area. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please
feel free to contact Joey Lawler at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
oe er
Proje anager
Dane A. Horna, P.E., V.P.
Senior Review
Lisa J. Becks om, C.W.B., C.E.
Natural Resources Department Manger
Attachments: Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: USDA Soil Survey Map
Figure 4: Approximate Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. Map
Site Photos
Routine Determination Forms, DWQ Stream Classification Forms and
USACOE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms
11
As Shown I I SITE VICINITY MAP I Figure
Checked by. DAH
Drawn by: JoL
Date: 06-09-04
70-Acre Property
U.S. Highway 74 and Old Caroleen Road
Forest City, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357-04-340
1
OF, i
?Oh: :_.. s .t. TopoQy?d* ?. O?fw .;..*py,jq"q../ ea ntsnt o.,wnr - _ .... _..
wwNw rt?!?rr.w rom
? '

r 4Z
6k
lfl? ,
lit
wy. t 3 -'.L
d?rryy. Y ? -.;
Soil Identification Leaend
7B = Buncombe loamy sand, 0-5% Slopes
+r? 1 724B2 = Pacolet-Bethlehem Complex, 2-8% Slopes, Eroded
}1w;
? 724C2 = Pacolet-Bethlehem Complex, 8-15°k Slopes, Eroded ,
724C2 = Pacolet-Bethlehem Complex, 15 25Y° Slopes, Eroded
,t 72402 = Pacolet-Bethlehem Complex, > 25% Slopes, Eroded {
Ud = Udorthents, loamy
Yt
Scale NTS USDA SOIL SURVEY MAP Figure
Checked by: DAH 70-Acre Property
U.S. Highway 74 and Old Caroleen Road
Drawn by: JoL Forest City, North Carolina 3
ENGINEERINt, LS11NG
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date: 06-09-04 Project No. 1357-04-340
m 1 where it enters pipe at N property
..m-�
Photo 3: Stream 3 near junction with Stream 4.
"n' Proto 2 — Stream 2 and adjacent riparlam wetlands.
Photo 5: Typical riparian wetland area near N property boundary.
Photo 4: Stream 6 near the E property boundary.
Photo 6: Typical riparian wetland area along Stream 4.
06/09/04 SITE PHOTOS
Taken by: JoL lb
Checked by: DAHSM
70-Acre Property
Project No. 1-57-04-340 Forest City, North Carolina

i y
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: 70-acre Property River Basin: Broad County: Rutherford
Evaluator: Joey Lawler/Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Second Broad River/9-41 Class WS-IV Date: 6/23/04
USGS QUAD: Forest City, NC Lat: 35.311°N Lon: 81.824°W
Location/Directions: East of Old Caroleen Road, South of Tracker Marine
Stream ID: Stream 1 (DP-1)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landovmer agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I_ Ctemmnrnhnln;jv
Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1 Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 2 3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4 Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5 Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6 Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9 Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2n Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map AndlOr In Field)
Present?
No = 0
Yes = 3
NO I E: It Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And W1 I HUU I Jmuosity 1 hen Score=u-)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 10
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2 3
'resent?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
IH. Biologv
Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Peri hyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
t a
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
T !t ,, .,,,...?,h,.l,,.?.I Ahcnnt Welk Moderate Strom
L t2.7
1) Is There a Head Cut?
0
.5
1
1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 1 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 1.5
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
TT TTvr?rnlnrrv
Ahcent Weak Moderate Strona
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present 1.5 1 .5 0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 1 1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*)
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5 1 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes = 1.5 No = 0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4.5
TTT Rl nIn(TV
Ahcent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
(*NOTE: If 7btat Absence UJAll Plants /n Streantbea As ivotea Aoove antp ints atep utvt caa my rresenc).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 23
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:
Joey Lawler
r a
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: 70-acre Property River Basin: Broad County: Rutherford
Evaluator: Joey Lawler/Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Second Broad River/9-41 Class WS-IV Date: 6/14/04
USGS QUAD: Forest City, NC Lat: 35.315°N Lon: 81.8241W
Location/Directions: East of Old Caroleen Road, South of Tracker Marine
Stream ID: Stream 2 (DP-2)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle Otte Nutnbcr Per Line)
T !!omm?rnhnlnrrv Ahcent Weak Moderate Strom
1 Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 2 3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4 Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5 Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
G Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7 Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9 Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2° Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map An(110r In Field)
Present?
No = 0
Yes = 3
NU I L: It licd & Bank Uausca sy vitcning Ana m i nuu i mnuosny i ncu ocuIc-v
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 13
II. Hydrology Absent Weak ivlouerate iron
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
TTT Rinlnr7V
Ahcent Weals Moderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Peri hyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
T 11 1n.r<1 AhcPnt Weals Moderate Strone
- VVVa__v_ _
1) Is There a Head Cut?
0
.5
1
1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 1 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 1.5
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
7T II.. rlvnlnrr<r
Ahu-nt Weak Moderate Stronu
?. _
1Z t!.Z
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present

1.5

1

.5

0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 1 1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5 1 1.5
Dr Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes _ 1.5 No = 0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4.5
TT7 Tzsnlnrr<i
Ahcent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV mostly 110stly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
(- /VU]L: If IOlaf ADSeneC Uf Al[ YlanlS Jn Jrrcanwcu as 1vUivL, -u ,,j, . nu -J, v ........... ..... 1.
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 26.25
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:
Joey La

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: 70-acre Property River Basin: Broad County: Rutherford
Evaluator: Joey Lawler/Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Second Broad River/9-41 Class WS-IV Date: 6/23/04
USGS QUAD: Forest City, NC Lat: 35.313°N Lon: 81.8241W
Location/Directions: East of Old Caroleen Road, South of Tracker Marine
Stream ID: Stream 3 (DP-3)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
T ("Pmmnrnlinlnav Ahsent Weak Moderate StronLy
1 Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 2 3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4 Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5 Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6 Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7 Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9 Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2° Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map Ai«UOr In Field)
Present?
No = 0
Yes = 3
NOI E: It tied ti Bank Caused By Uttcntng Ana wt t riuu t atnuosity i nen acorc=v-)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 9
II. Hydrology Absent W eaR ivlouerate z!otron
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
TTT Rinlnav
Ahsent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Peri hyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
1 1
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I C;'nmmnrnhnlnav Ahsent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 1 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 1.5
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
TT_ Nvrlrnlnov
Ahsent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present 1.5 1 .5 0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 1 1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5 1 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of
Yes
= 1.5

No=0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
m- Bioloijv Absent Weak Moderate Stronu
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
(' NU/E: /f Yotal Absence UJ All Plants in wreambca As lVotea Abore 3KIP tius Jtcp uwe.c33 JAV rresenr).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 21
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:
Jo 1 1

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: 70-acre Property River Basin: Broad County: Rutherford
Evaluator: Joey Lawler/Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No;
Nearest Named Stream: Second Broad River/9-41 Class WS-IV Date: 6/24/04
USGS QUAD: Forest City, NC Lat: 35.316°N Lon: 81.820'W
Location/Directions: East of Old Caroleen Road, South of Tracker Marine
Stream ID: Stream 4 (DP-4)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural strearn-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
T 17nmmnrnhnlnnv Ahcent Weak Moderate Strom
1 Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 1) 3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4 Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5 Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6 Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7 Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9 Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2° Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map AnttlOr In Field)
Present?
No = 0
Yes = 3
NU It: It tied & tsanK l:aUSea try uncmng nnu w i i nuu i auwwny ,lull owic-? j
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 12
II. Hydrology Absent Weak 1wouerate L*)>Lron
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
TTT Rininav
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Peri hyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
T r'omm?rnhnlnrtv Ahcent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 1 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 1.5
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
IT Hwirnlnov
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present 1.5 1 .5 0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 1 1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 5 1 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes - 1.5
F I No - 0
Channel or in Head Cut? I
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
ITT Rinlnav Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly ATostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 775 .5 0 '0
(• NUTS: /J 7otat Absence UJ All Plants in Jtrcamoca As NOtea Aoove )Kip i nts otep vtvLc-3,3,3.v v rrescm -).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 24.25
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:
Joe'
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: 70-acre Property River Basin: Broad County: Rutherford
Evaluator: Joey Lawler/Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Second Broad River/9-41 Class WS-IV Date: 6/24/04
USGS QUAD: Forest City, NC Lat: 35.314°N Lon: 81.8281W
Location/Directions: East of Old Caroleen Road, South of Tracker Marine
Stream ID: Stream 5 (DP-5)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural strearn-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (C,,,I, 0,, Number Per Line)
T !'n?mnrr?hnlnrrt? Ahcent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 1) 3
3 Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5 Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6 Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7 Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9 Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2° Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map An(LlOr In Field)
Present?
No = 0
Yes = 3
NU It: It tied & IJanK Laused ny uncnmg nnu ?v i i nuu i auiuuany ,,-1 -u ,
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 11
II. Hydrology Absent Weak lvionerate '31ron
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
TTT Mnlnav
Ahcent Weak Moderate Stronu
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Peri hyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 6
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
Ahcnnt WP:Ik Mnderate StronLy
1) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 1 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 1.5-
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
IT u. ,1a ,.., l .,.T. I
AhcPnt Weak Mnderate Strom!
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present 1.5 1 .5 0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 1 1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*)
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5 1 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes = 1.5 No = 0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
TTT MnInrtV
Ahcent Weak Moderate Stronu
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPI,
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed' 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
(' AV I E: Jf 1 olal Absence UJ All rlanls In J(reantaea As jvuwu AUuvv 0n1p 1 n. -LJJ v. -, - .. ?o?,.. 1.
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 26
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:
a ler

ACTION ID Stream I
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAME Odom and Assoc
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Broad WS-IV Class 941

Certified Industrial Sites
DATE 6-23-04
COUNTY/CITY Rutherford/Forest City, NC
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Rain within 48 hours
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
O Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present None identified
o Benthic Macroinvertebratcs No EPT observed
o Amphibians Prescnt/Breeding Salamander observed
O Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function)
O Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Tracks observed
O Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
O Riffle/Pool Structure None present
O Stable Streambanks Weak presence
o Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course
sand
o Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Red maple, flowering dogwood, mountain laurel,
American holly
O Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure Very week undercutting observed
o Flow in Channel
o Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
Discontinue Significant wetland areas observed.
O Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September)
o Seeps/Groundwater Discharge'(June thru September)
O Adjacent Floodplain Present Present only in some areas
O Wrack Material or Drift Lines None present
o Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Arrowhead and netted chain fern
Important to Domestic Water Supply? No
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Yes
Peremiial Channel (stop) O Important Channel: 700 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
O Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Chamtel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if of n C.O.E. project manager - Joey Lawler)
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98

ACTION ID Stream 2
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAINIE Odom and Assoc

DATE 6-14-04
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) Certified Industrial Sites
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Broad WS-IV Class 9-41
COUNTY/CITY Rutherford/Forest City, NC
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Rain within 48 hours
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
o Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present None identified
o Benthic Macro invertebrates
o Amphibians Present/Breeding Salamander observed
o Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function)
O Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Deer scat
o Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
o Riffle/Pool Structure None present
o Stable Streambanks
o Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course
sand
o Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Red maple, flowering dogwood, mountain laurel,
American holly
o Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure Very week undercutting observed
o Flow in Channel
o Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
Discontinue
O Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September)
o Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
© Adjacent Floodplain Present
O Wrack Material or Drift Lines None present
O Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Arrowhead and netted chain fern
Important to Domestic Water Supply? No
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? No
Perennial Channel (stop) o Important Channel: 225 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
O Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if her i . .E. project manager - Joey Lawler)
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
• t t
ACTION ID Stream 3
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Broad WS-IV Class 9-41
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Rain within 48 hours
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
O Fish/ShelIfish/Crustaccans Present None identified
O Benthic Macro invert ebrates
O Amphibians Present/Breeding Salamander observed
O Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function) Iron-oxidizing bacteria observed
O Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Raccoon tracks
O Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
O Riffle/Pool Structure None or very weakly present
O Stable Streambanks Little or no incision noted
a Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course
sand Areas of cobble and pebble noted, but is largely sand
O Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Red maple, ironwood, tulip tree, Chinese privet
O Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure Undercutting observed
O Flow in Channel Approximately I" slowly-flowing of water
O Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
Discontinue Riparian wetlands present
O Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September)
O Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
O Adjacent Floodplain Present Wetland area
O Wrack Material or Drift Lines Attributed to recent heavy rains
O Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Jewelweed and false nettle
Important to Domestic Water Supply? No
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils slap? No
Perennial Channel (stop) O Important Channel: 185 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
O Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other th .O. E. project manager - Joey Lawler)
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAME Odom and Assoc

DATE 6-23-04
Certified Industrial Sites
COUNTY/CITY Rutherford/Forest City, NC
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98

INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID Stream 4 APPLICANT NAME Odom and Assoc
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) Certified Industrial Sites
DATE 6-24-04
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Broad WS-IV Class 9-41 COUNTY/CITY Rutherford/Forest City, NC
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Rain within 48 hours
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
o Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present None identified
o Benthic Macro invertebrates No EPT observed
o Amphibians Present/Breeding Salamander observed
© Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function) Iron-oxidizing bacteria observed
o Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Animal tracks
o Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
o Riffle/Pool Structure None
o Stable Streambanks Upstream portion of channel extremely incised
o Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course
sand
o Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Red maple, box elder, tulip tree
o Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure No undercutting observed
o Flow in Channel Flow present
o Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
Discontinue Large wetland area adjacent to downstream portion
O Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September) Standing water present
o Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
O Adjacent Floodplain Present
O Wrack Material or Drift Lines None present other than that attributed to nearby river
o Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Arrowhead and netted chain fem.
Important to Domestic Water Supply? No
Does Clrannel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Alap? No
Perennial Channel (stop) a Important Channel: 165 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
O Intermnittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(i .O.E. project manager-Joey Lawler)

P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
INTERMITTENT CHANNELS
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID Stream 5
APPLICANT NAME Odom and Assoc
DATE 6-24-04
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Broad WS-IV Class 9-41
Certified Industrial Sites
COUNTY/CITY Rutherford/Forest City, NC
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Rain within 48 hours
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
o Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present None identified
0 Benthic Macro invertebrates No EPT observed
0 Amphibians Present/Breeding Salamander observed
0 Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function)
0 Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Scat observed
0 Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
0 Riffle/Pool Structure None present
0 Stable Streambanks Present
0 Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course
sand Similar to surrounding terrain
0 Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Tulip tree, red maple
0 Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure Undercutting observed
0 Flow in Channel
0 Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
Discontinue Significant wetland areas observed.
0 Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September)
0 Sceps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
0 Adjacent Floodplain Present Present in areas
0 Wrack Material or Drift Lines Present
0 Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Arrowhead
Important to Domestic Water Supply? No
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Yes
Perennial Channel (stop) 0 Important Channel: 115 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
0 Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Tlirough Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if otl C.O.E. project manager - Joey Lawler)
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DELINEATION
(1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL)
Project/Site: North Carolina Certified Sites Program Date: 6-23-04
Applicant/Owner: Odom and Associates County: Rutherford
Investigator: Suzanne Knudsen State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the Site? YES NO Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YES NO Transect ID: WDP Plot ID: 1
Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES NO Lat: 35.3150N Lon: 81.824°W
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liriodendron tulipfera T FAC 9.
2. Juncus effuses T FACW+ 10.
3. Ligustrum sinense H FAC 11.
4. Acer rubrum S/S FAC 12.
5 Ilex opaca S/S FAC- 13.
6. Polystichum acrostichoides H FAC 14.
7. Liriodendron tulipfera S/S FAC 15.
8 Eulalia viminea H FAC+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OB L, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 7/8 = 87.5%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
® No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Depth of Surface Water (in.) ---
Depth to Free Water in Pit (in.) 2 inches
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) 0 inches
Remarks:
Area recently ponded.
Wetland hydrology is present.
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Paco let-Beth lehem Complex Drainage Class: well
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Kanhapludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped
Type? Yes ? No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION Community ID: Wetland
Depth Matrix Color
Horizon
(inches) (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle

(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Texture,
Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-4 A 5YR 4/1 5YR 3/3 Common/distinct Sand
4-8 B 10 YR 6/0 10YR 411 Common/indistinct Sand
8+ C 7.5 YR 6/0 7.5 YR 5/6 Common/indistinct Silty sand

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Concretions
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in
Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil is present. A horizon mucky.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® YES ? NO
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES ? NO ®YES ? NO
Hydric Soils Present? ® YES ? NO
Remarks:
Data point is located within a wetland.
1 1 1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DELINEATION
(1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL)
Project/Site: North Carolina Certified Sites Date: 6-24-04
Applicant/Owner: Odom and Associates County: Rutherford
Investigator: Joey Lawler/Suzanne Knudsen State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the Site? YES NO Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YES NO Transect ID: ' WD P Plot ID: 2
Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES NO Lat: 35.316°N Lon: 81.820°W
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stra Indicator
1. Carpinus caroliniana T FAC 9. Sagittaria latifolia H OBL
2. Platanus occidentalis T FACW- 10. Ligustrum sinense H FAC
3. Lirlodendron tulipfera T FAC 11. Lindera benzoin H FACW
4. Betula nigra T FACW 12. Polystichum acrostichoides H FAC
5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica S/S FACW 13. Arundinaria gigantea H FACW
6. Toxicodendron radicans V FAC 14.
7. Parthenocissus quinquefolia V FAC 15.
8 Impatiens capensis H FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OB L, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 13/13 =100%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
® No Recorded Data Available
V FIELD OBSERVATIONS I
Depth of Surface Water (in.) 1 inch
Depth to Free Water in Pit (in.) '/2 inch
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) 0 inches
Remarks:
Partially inundated.
Wetland hydrology is evident.
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
® Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Pacolet-Bethlehem Complex Drainage Class: Well
Taxonomy (Subgroup): TyP is KanhaP ludults Field Observations Confirm Mapped
Type? Yes ? No
PROFILE DESCRIPTION Community ID: Wetland
Depth Matrix Color
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,
(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR 311 -- -- Silt
5+ B 10YR 4/1 1OR 5/2 Few/indistinct Silt

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Concretions
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in
Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soil is hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® YES ? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® YES ? NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
® YES ? NO
Hydric Soils Present? ® YES ? NO
Remarks:
Data point is located within a wetland.
s
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank. --1 ou
I. Processing L 2005
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit oEry? ``?ie
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rutherford County
Mailing Address: 289 North Main Street
Rutherfordton, NC 28139
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address: [e-mail] (John Condrey, County Manager)
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Odom Hollifield & Associates Engineering
Company Affiliation: ConsultinEngineer
Mailing Address: 152 East Main Street
Forest City, North Carolina 28043
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jonhollifieldgodomengineering.com (Jon Hollifield, P.E.)
Page 3 of 3
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Rutherford 74 Corporate Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): parcel # 1634517 and 1634518
4. Location
County: Rutherford Nearest Town: Forest City
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Rutherford 74 Corporate Center
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Highway 74, Old Caroleen Road
Exit, turn right at top of ramp, site is less than'/4 mile on left.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N 35 18 54/ W 81 49 26
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Currently the land is not used.
7. Property size (acres):
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Second Broad River
9. River Basin: Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at hup://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
92.95 acres
Page 4 of 4
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a road for a future industrial park
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: dozer, front end loader,
compactor
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: rural/residential/ industrial
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: The future development of the industrial park maw require additional permits. This
permit includes needs for the primary entrance and road throuizh the park. As other businesses
join the park in the future, there may be a need to apply for permits if the future buildings or
roads make an impact.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 5
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 Fill 0.09 yes Immediate area Forested wetlands

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:/hvww.fema.cov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 1.43
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Streatn
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )
1 Culvert 231 UT to Second Broad 1 ft. Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditch ing/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
Nvww.usl?s.zov. Several imcmet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
wN w.manguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 231
Page 6 of 6
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The requirements for the industrial nark are to limit the road P-rades to 6% in order to provide for
heavy truck access. This created a fill depth requirement of 35 feet. This is unavoidable.
Additionally, we have provided for 2:1 side slopes on the fill even though we would have
preferred 3:1 (which is what is provided for in the rest of the park). Given the road width
requirements for access with the shoulder width requirements for utilities the impacted distance
is as small as possible.
Page 7 of 7
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The County plans to pay into the NCWRP at the required rate of $205/ LF of stream impact
at a 1:1 ratio.
Contact has been made with EEP. The "In Lieu Fee Request Form" was faxed to Carol Shaw
on 6/1/05.
Page 8 of 8
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://t120.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 231
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 9
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
"Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0212 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
As shown on plans
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer plans have been included to give detail on gravity sewer and pump station proposed
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 10 of 10
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
" 2oO
- je ? l
Appli It/Agent's Signature Date
(Age 's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 11

I 880
I r ,
878 I I i POSSE
(
I
°
?
V
1
2
I
/ 876 1 I ro N
RIPRA i Q N (
I
D
874

/
?
INV. OU
' /

72

I

V

r-

?

1

?

?
833.4
?
633.
TSP
T I. I I II I I I ? , ? > ?!
I 1
?
l S
?
' 870- I
LENGTH 13 ?
LENGTH - It
' I I I I I I ? I ? I '
W pTH 1S' - 22
7
868 Yn U
DAP 2 DEP
H - >
YIEI - 4' IR - 866 i I S
f I ?I I I III I
IMP CTED
864
kTLANDS - l
AREA n?8 862
o
I
V
O '
I

Ogg 860 l
I I
?
'
I I R
CA ??
+L ro
858 Kl in I
,
COK
"_.
/ 856 1
098 l 6 - ?-

854
1 _

i
1
.1
I I I
I
> II I
T
852

0

850 4 0
+ II I ( I I ?' I

? 848 N
/ I I III II I I I ?
?
00
? 2+
?
846
?
l
?
I I
? I I i I III. 1 i? l ? ?
i 1
844 rz -p
I

a 1
842
( 11?I
??°?°I I IN I -

840 I ? ? ? ? ?
? I ? ? I I I I 1

838 I' IIII
I
?
I ?l1 I, I I I I I I ? 1
836 I
1 I E ?K

? ( 41 •i
i

834 l I E
-7 _ i IIN
IIFR CU 3
T REEK f4
?
832 1 1 1 1 I l 1 ,
?'
l l fuEDIA
N?E D

? ? j
?
Z 830
I
'v? ?o
1 1 ?o ? F cRUSHEQ(
:
NOTE: 231
/017 STREARI
WILL BE DISTURBED 828
III
-TON r
r?
I !V

826 il l II I II I I 1
` +
VIII
1 ?? c 1

/ 824 uGRF I 1
i 1 _
'
° 1 1 1 1
? I I ?I Il l l1 11 v`
822
0
?'
i DATUM ELEV 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l i t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ?
,?
?
TEMP BERM 820.00
i I I I I 1 II I I
? L Iq l I I I I

T- co co co co co II I V I I I I I H 1
209 ZF. OF 48"
© SLOP RC
I / / I
LNG I t %

D 2 INV IN 842.0 I
E1 2'
TSP g2 /

0+

00 1+00 2+00

ENTER LINE OF

L

(

a

-)
D
00

?

00
00

v

0
Lo
00

?

n
00

?

n
00
00

;

1
00

M

?
00

?

n
00

o

`r
00

?

r,
00

t

t
00

o

00
co

?

cm
?
00

n

00
00

o
r-
'?
00

n

t
?
00

?

o
?
00

?

C6
N
00

m

Do
?
00

?t

?
I
LO
00
LENGTH
J DTH - 22' i

/
?I I \ WE R 4 2 48" PIPE LOOKING
NORTH TO SOUTH
10+
00
11
+
00

E

N

ER
12
+

LI
0

N
0

E

F RO

A
13+

D
00 14+0

0
CAR
''"??
CARS

JOB NAME: RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER
" =
SCALE: 1 100'

DRAWN BY: JCW
Fr
EI 1) 4
'

E Ssl
?0. E o LOCATION: RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C.
DATE: 5/25/05
CHECKED BY: DWO

21 PROJECT MGR: JFH
152 East Main Street
` PROJECT NUMBER SHEET
Forest City, N.C. 28043
828-247-4495 ` E ?5.,•
ID-- O'90
???,,,11111,,,??? DESCRIPTION: PLAN & PROFILE OF CREEK CROSSING
05005 0
1 OF 1
28922
'Atu%10 F
ENGINEERING PLANS FOR:
RlJTlHMPJF0Rl3 74
CORPORATE CENTER
PROJECT LOCATION:
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER:
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
INDEX
SHEET TITLE SHEET
COVER SHEET 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
UTILITIES LAYOUT 3
ENTRANCE MODIFICATIONS 4-5
ROAD GRADING/PROFILES 6-9
EROSION CONTROL LAYOUT 10
WATER LAYOUT 11
SEWER LAYOUT 12-13
WATER DETAILS 14
SEWER DETAILS 15
STREET/EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 16

LEGEND
EXISTING WATER LINE
- - - - PROPOSED PRCERTY LINE
-X-X- EXISTING FENCE
-E-E- EXISTING POWER LINE
- R, -RV - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-VAY
-RV-RV - PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
o EXISTING FENCE
PROJECT BOUNDRY
' y--
hVO EXISTING HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
PROPOSED HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
x EXISTING GATE VALVE
W PROPOSED GATE VALVE
0 EXISTING SEVER MANHOLE
• PROPOSED SEVER MAW47LE
PROPOSED CURB INLET
PROPOSED STI3RM DRAIN
***CAUTION***

NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL

e
t 3 DAYS BEFORE DIGQNG CALL
TOLL FREE 1-800-632-4649

IK UWM SHOFM ARE 94aM FDR WE ( TRAOTO'3 CD A? M a Y. DER[
RAY K OR YRIRRS ROT SWM1 OR T[3 PLANS THE plarEm ASSRQ No
RTY(MRNY FORM IOCAR 9 NO R 9u W T C9R1fI 's
IR R-m5m 1Y m %vR m IOG1 v N un m- M I n v Rt
? M DuU WADE TO MSn UMTES RY M WORACTUt sx H 1C
sat WS-O SOLNY OF nc CO(TWMFL
i7
152 East Alain Street
Forest City, N.C. 28043
828-247-4495
DAM LARCH 4. 2005
PROJECT NUMBER: 05005
DRAWING NAME PHASE 2
PROJECT MANAGER: JFH
DRAWN BY: JCW
CHECKED BY: DWO
NO DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
YIWYI IT MNr
(not to stole)
II I I `.fin / -,_ 1
I w s?t?t FMDID MOCE
ADVAL 1
R, rI
?
x
I
/
TitM?Q O4SiB10 SEEM
osim ?
LIFT 5TATA)m
11? 11t ,?
L? ? 41?\?//,?'"?,\ \ ? \IIIII, Ilt?l?ttt \?•? ?ta?'111'I l?l,,'?-'??.???? ,?? .: ?; ?`?/,?/ ???1 \\\ \\\?? ?/ ? ? I III I
P,? \?/ ?? \ 11
\\ 1` a? \ III//%/
. R4i'S'ror 1 I I 1 1 1 t\\\t
': '9s°?p ??11??/%-v?v?t\ \ 1 111111`1111ttA VtAA??t,? 11' I i ?IS? / l / ?? ?\ it //1 ? \V ? ? - ? ii
' \ t ta, 111 I l l ll, l 1 a ? _`?; l ?_.\ \? i ? r ll _? ? ? 1 1///? rri
pr rc? I? ? v t 1 1 1 ' I 1 t? '` I I ll 1, l ? ? l l ?( a v v.? v? ?- I I ///,
\ t I 1111 IIt11?1? ?ltA111, l l/,, // - / ?. I Il .mow ?? ?r v \? J// ?%??%
1
1
.1
1
I
I(x
I 'o
I
I ?
I
I U
I F
1 , - v \ 11 , I Ill! /?,li ,/ / / I I f / ( suNr rtwa?
1 --
I I - - 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I ?? 111 I I I r.: / / A Ill v vv ?// / ?K /
A Vv? A I 1 l l I I I 111 Il v? vA vv / 11 - I I////W f } 1 111111, //?? 11)11lll?lrlll''; I/l,ls
?_-D- -mil) \ v? ?? /?i%? I 1111 I? %=?\1\1,111
I A l i 1 ? •?? i/, /
? ?.? / / / Il / /l Ir Ill ??l,?l?/?i??'?i%i//i%//l??(11\ //r//?////?-???/ii//--w? ( ??v?-?/ / ?Ill)11?1??1?ii%=11111j,1?1??? w ? v
pi' /1;'/I
//i - -TOTAL SITE/ACREAGE v` V A 1 111 III 1\? III 1 \??\ \ \ \
I .t 1 I l I // //i _ ?vA \ tl i 1111/ / / .ez9a actiea V \ , A , ??, A
1"`\\
OCRM
v 1 11 )I v?IIIII? I'r // / // ??- vvv ?v I I I I I\ 1 11 A IIl///
/l I ??\ \ \
//I1\ I ?I? I I ?? _ v ?I11"
1/ 1!11111 1 1
` I?1 I I I III'IIv,E?- ???? ? 11111 I III I.11?,/ // / 1 ll, / / / - ? A\ tl I / // ? / I )Il Jl 111 I
I , I ?I ? ? ? ? 1 ullil 11 //r / , ll 1,// / ,__,--_ v ? 1 I i i // ) l l / ll l I I II? I I I I
I- I I II _ v / / / 111 )111111 ?IIII 11///// (?( / ?? / Ill/?l 1 / / r//??_? - /// // I I 1 // )
/// 111 11 / / 1) I { / \
t 1 11 1 av? ???(Ky ' v v I 1 I ll)/?l / 1/,,/ri,,? ? ///? ? 1, 1 ? 1I ,1 I 11 I / I / / _,/ I !I \ v I v /l1V
x/11,
g???/i //////
It
-xis
a I 1 it /I t 1 ?. IIII //
/I//'
I '? I I C\0
1 1 IJI'
V I V ?l) ? ?r?? vv1, 111I1,II;?II,1. 1111,//? X11 I l
/? \ ,1?- ? ?v ? ??_ Vv 1 I I IIIII1111?111?11a', 1' 1 ; 111
II ? I '
I` \ I _\1 \\ \?? 11111III1111';1\\??\ ?111 I(/
IIIIII?111`;A\ ?\\?`, .II
11I111111\1\\`,`,Ilh, Illy II I
? ? ? C// /) , I1 II 11?1 11 I},, 1 . 1
11?11t?` t?
1 I I I'1) 4F
Cpy
\ ??• 'Ik v tip'

I tai i DPBOJnIION I BY I DA= I
BfAlt t' ¦ low
Nam RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER Z 03~0a
`i toumm RUTHBRFORD COUNTY, N.C.
153 East Alain Street
Eared City, 4
495 immmum E%tSfING CONDITIONS
8288-24 2.{73195
MUIFN By. WIF
mnwm B BY. DBO
PRO= UM AB
JOB Nulm= BBat:
OBDOO 20716
Q
---- - -o v 'fir 7? s Hamm ? y -ir j f =---- - ---- --- ---- I( v - - - --- - - -- - / ---- - -
-c III sm min !?/i/, 4?
a II I ?'I J, 1;yj Vii' - - I //, i'?/r /l•a, \? /// / ?, I
c I I !yl i vkr?s,
I I r ?//? - ? I x ?i
/
?0
,:
f 11? ??' - I / v ?? ?! \VAAV1\\ Nib
11 /i ? - A? -?..? 1 I I? ?14•. 4J, i //" ? ?S?i.,PNZ ?f/// ii 1 11??AV A\???// //? f ?I I1 ? .?
,Il??i/,/-v? ? v`? 1 I ? ?II', ,,,, ?,• l', i -=??- ? ? AV ? .?-";????„ ?`v?????=!/i?iv I, ; I II ?I ? I?
oor sy ?_ ?v 1 1 1 II 111111111`1 \ III Ir'lI,, ??, vvV? i -/?1 Milik P"ACLIv
off - -- 1 1 1111 1 Al ? ! 1 ? - •. I ?? - vA Vv /? v ? \ I I ///? / ? ?' ? ' .
I \ 1 l l l l l l l , I 4?' 11' I l l 11 l lip // -?? )II l \?\ \ `l \ , / -/?j/ii \. \
_, ' 1 1 l l PACZ
\ '' 1 I I I ! r?i i //? Ct - 11 //// _\ \?r - J !!f II I? ii \?l\ ?1 \
?
1?_wv?? vw
/i /i/ L/ \ \111 11\\\// i???llll 111A?? ???\\ vA
(, I . / ,?,/ -' .?? X11 111!1 ? /. /'•?; // ;.; , , ,? ?? vv ` ` ? 1 1 111??% 11\•VA ;' ?? \?\\??1 \
-13 _ _ ?/ 1 ? v ??.vv v v ? 1 1 II1 w _-'v 1 ? .. -? ? 111/) 1 \ \
/*m/i`ua/viiIFr
1 I Ilflfl l? ??-?? `1111?1?11j1'?? (?? `,icrr?l ////' i?----/?/ ?????\v? I I I I Jlll ? V 1 1I\? )lll?jlll111,?\\?
?, ?? I II;??`?v v?. /J lllllnf flll,I I // /
o l/l/ll? I?ff?l l?rllll l/// ///
i7!G9?'?II'?l ,1I r I // I I I// v / l l 1 I I / // 1l II I
?- R ` ??
IE 1a? v-?k
/ -. / I \ ? ? / / I ! J /
1 1 ? 1 // l t ' stmt rAcc ?,z/ /
lrllli'/ffJ???/?
111//
a? I? I III/ 111--?\
?v 1
W1 ?:-
111 -_-
?
? ? /1 \ \A?? v?? ?1 ?? V1111111 if
1111111'11l11/
?? ?° V `,1?"'vv? '? ?V?1 111111;11p11?11111, ?'1' 'll
lv \ ,' `? `v`?? 111111111111111'1\??\? '111; II /1
v / I `, A 1 ;III 11 11111 1 ? ????? . ? 1
w?a ? ? ?.? I , I ?, 1111111\?? II?II
'?? ° ?? v `? l 11 1 I??' I I I ? I II I;I 1111V?"1\I'1 '? II; I ? ?
/ I c// / / 1. III?II1111?1\11);?Il, I I I
1
? 1 f I I I 1 1 ?\ ? 1111??A??\1
</II 1111.
pow ? ? ? , ??I I I1 ; ?
SR ;-9, pogo ?l \
Dzscznn x

\
\

O WAIR: s' ¦ 100' DRON mrt rc?
D0 0 rum x- RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER /04ro5 vr: mro

28B2ZJ'q=
?t•? Lomn , RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C.
P201mCT YCE 11H

? '4t7N3o
'' 153 East Main Strctt
Forst Gtr,N.C.38W3

UTHTfES LAYOUT

?
i
AN e38-3474495 05M s07
i6
S 0
MA()lE71C
EXIST. EDGE
OF PAVEMENT
b
A01D
OIA0?d01/
??oxE R ?
x 100' TAPER S
'g
o ?Y
Io'X7O 100P STORAGE
SIGHT TRIANGLE W
,a t ? I I
V I +a N PROPOSED TRAFFIC
ISLAND
R W 10, ,a to n EXIST. EDGE
OF PAVEMENT
SoiTIE- eE1L Rc?i
TAPER
R EDGE ITF NEW "y sitE EASEMENT, See/197
- to ' it EDGE OF NEV THRU LANE
,
n I
I a ACCELERATION LANE
K ?J
_ RAa PROPOSED NEW R/V JSE
n? 8
10'%T0'
\AI SIGHT TRIANGLE Opa TAPER LARRY 0. CRmOSTAPF
550/778
EDGE OF NEV A RSa 1o0' STORAGE
/ Q 1
I \ EDGE OF NEW THRU LANE tro' STORAGE
R, I DECELERATION LANE I
PJOVSTRIAL PARK
L0711
PMUSTRAL PARK
LOTPO
q
ENTRANCE DETAIL
SCALE 11' - 30?
[fF rmf HIT 81YUk-JOUS 014" COURSE
N / 1174 COMPACTED 70100%
COMPACIM STANDARD
BITU1P10115 TACK COAT I
NOTE: CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF ANY
PAVEMENT MARKINGS DISTURBED OR COVERED BY OVERLAY.
TYPICAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVERLAY
N
A-A ROAD CROSS SECTION
NIB
LANL LANE
R-R ROAD CROSS SECTION
Nn
EXISTING ROAD CROSS
SECTI
Nn
MAGNETIC
7?f roTAl PA
R?
RW
c?
7E7XIST,
o /
1 Tjl
NdJ57 PMK
,uE R V
jeo!E
x??? RW
vv %
W
I ?J OfD C/It018?N ROAD
80' R/r
EN
S?L'iS"E AL'.L RIGHT OF
WAY 5?'E U5L4?4T, f, 536/91
N40MTR(AL PARK
ENTRANCE DETAIL
31 V.b

LARRY D. CRNCSTAI
550/7)8

/If l I I / / / \ ` E%'8E \ 1 1 \
- I/ I \ WATER \\ 1 I
TAORADE \ \ 1 1
tANN
BOLMD
1f1 RT \ \ \ \ \ R 11000 maw \ \ \ \ 1 0 0.931 COPE 1 I
\ .v. OUT 26 \ I I I F
\ rR R N000 23
1
/ \ \ \ NY?ai 0.90.5 R 0. t 1` SLOPE
32 .
\ I I I j
-C9 3?a
aim NP R HOOD M231 32 L . a 10.• I , / / cu ?
I I I
/
TOP wa a 117
/ 9n. a r ac& es /
ANT
OAD
,I \
H
i
NV, OUT 915.5 RR 6,6% A\ RE /
31LE'CPIe•?
/ I i RLP O 61 30PE //
and OF HOOD 73J r
/ j/ 91Y. M 0.80.57 /
/ 1 / I / / / ? / 1NV. r 0.0.1.37 rr
1.00 i 00
CC)
' 1 1 I I V 32'Lf.IR?16 II / dlV M6129 ; ?
?
SLOPE
?, i ? 1 I 1i I C I I \ \\ "? I ale;? ( // /
op
? I .? ? Beau
239.9 Lf. Y 1
OP U N000 92"4 I I I / - RR 0 S.M%
ENV. OUT 9115 -- \ V 1 d? V
'1 I ?ap_R
I J 11000 MIS—-
ow.
iwi'e9iex
I I // 15e36LEOF 2,
_ma.C92x>nc? \ 11 I 11 I I l
?? I I C2 I I I III
p s? 1 o__ I II ,, Illo I\?? A I
lI
00
Dzscwr 1111 _ _ J? ,,I ??` I
Ey elit
eruct i' . <a onrx an icr
S?? o!nnHo FIEEB3l xnm RUTEZWORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER DATE: 03/04/05 ?cm en mo
1 ` \ s? I zse ?? t RUTHERFORD COUNTY. N.C. reotur xct trn
152 E9n Main Slmi
\ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I . y 7IRfi f%+ Formt City, N.C. 28043 ?r
'?kr `,' s:a27, ??s ROAD GRADING 703 HUMEM 95999 e OF is A

r , %- 1II _= J _ l 1 1
TOP OF HOOD-1957.
I I I I / r / RLP-`6L'4Cpf
// /
Tsp11
' '-? 8 ??? ?? ???! \ I I I I
LEN,
ZT. - /om61- Id /r r/? a?i eso.ae / r
;
E ANDS
860 V ?? I I I
? BB O,
]77M LF OF W TOP OF HOOD 115C6'.00
/
?l R(Y O 2X 4f)K NY. N 841A0 I
xv.OUT
af.xo I I 0? / ??
3,FEET, ,OF1 WILL BE MTURBO
?xa exsavt
?.97/ / /
x?
r .37
I I i I l ??, ,- I I I 1
/ I rora?yooIli 1e?? mar.Waeb
MY. IXll ebEE Nv. IT 616)5 / I I ARr
200 Zr OF /41r
f2l
i 7"" 4'0 I I woTM
1 I 111 I l l ?/ I
II1??I11 ? II / ?? 1 ?
I 1 11 ? 1 , / I
1, 11
JI ??? I 1 1
4 0bUM-YlflEI3${E eP1Ir 1• • 10 DilTll 8fi M
/' ! / I I 1 tcwo wm RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER UM 07/04/05 czz® Irr) m
4 RUTHHRFORD COUNTY, N.C. PRO= mm an'
rs:es),,.i. St-d
il?ll ?/l 1 l
Foy, City, N.C. a} :ROAD GRADING 5m
s:a:n-449uvs aeons 7 OF 15
-300.24 LF. OF 6W
/// Feu a eoo
NV.OUT 8,;":3'0 ?/ 7 / INV. ourlo4.77
/ tl ?\ ?\ 1
295.00 L.
au ??? \ \ \ ' v
RCJ'Y7I7;? ? I \\ 1
Q ?A} W
PROCESS RATER FRID7 8?0 _? %HO '? I 1 s
7REA7YQI7 UC0011
a \/ ?? v /0 \ \ \ //; \
NYo.RI7 ..6741; M1 r l \ 1 > // /,?
NIN u w os 0 v Vl/ I / / //?
I J \\ CONTRACTOR TO REM"' l?l I lI ' ?j// \\\\\ Q
11 I \?-- '? /l ?l \ \ SOPER DISPOSE OF PACE 2 LNQ?
. 701.74 V. R 48"I ROT[ ` \ r 1 I l II I 1 /// / \ 11 \\ / ^\ \
\ 1? / / I 1 1` / // 1 0, \ // /` \\\\\\ \ \
/ RCP 00.70E SIJIPE' CONTRACTOR OUP TIOE COORDINATE
7N \l I I / I I ?///// \\ 11 \ ?\ ??/// / \ \\
NA ENGINEER RO ON
Q ( /I \ SALL F
SAIME JS co RIM ?? \\ /i I I \
NV. ql, 675.37 ?` \ \ v / 1 I I \ \` ? /// 11 \ xl? I I I I \
\I l? ? \\ ? /\/ // I ? 850 \1 ???/ I I I \
o
s8
aso ?//? / / \ ?\\ \ ?/ 1 \ \ \ I 1 1
,? _, . ? . \ I III 1
00
20214 6P. K 46' // ' \ \ I I I
RcP' 1
7 MSLCPE 66o
\C 9 ¢rWRiny o \ \ \
BY DAn
\ I
I ECIft 1' • f0' D&il/ BTt JCi
oDwH rm mtm RUTHEMRD 74 CORPORATE CENTER MM ? OS ® By: om
/ 1 r i8? I A4
RUTHHRFORD COUNTY, N.C. rzon= mm zm
252 East Main Street
7N0 9: Foret City, N.C. 28043
N?? Jo81m1? mmr
828-247-44956 ROAD GRADING
aeoaa a of to
aa
PA STA - 1.50
PN ELEY .97071
A.D. - -1.00
K . xi00
1-1 YO
>a i ?i? o R
235 l
{
l
i?
J
1

31
9 I L 1
928
1
914
I I I I I I I
1 T 111 I Ti
970 I
• i II
9t8 ? ? ? ? ? ? 1
I ?57 : I I I I I I V N 1
11 u £ I
9 Hi ll M i ll 1
I T
II ? ?? I

°04
?
? I
r II ????
T ??I
T PN ni vl? w77e
?
?djj 111 I I
Y ? t
L O'F N9( f LTA ?
iJA4}} 0 71 0
Q
'I
I L
I I
000
1
Yy
11-
p
5}A
IHS
b
7 .
I .
t
jl .
,l

?? 'J S? 1 ? I ? 1 I PN pIY 652 ? ? jj ?
? I I ? j! I II I A ??? _ ? ry l
891 ° 770q
1!!::i 8
o
b Y
I n I ? ? o i

I
I
I I III ''I ?? y s lf l

? I I I 11 ? ?' I m ' 1
I ? D'
J
1 II
l I?

tl
7
ttl 1 1
ne l 1 5 ii I
4111
w
6se -
I 1 T f'
?
?
?' 1 1 ?
? a
.. +
I I I I I I ' 1 l i I?
? a ?; ! il l;
884 1 I I, ,
II ii. i ?
- 1
}
}?
} 1
I I I I i 11 Illlii ?
ee5
I
II
?
I
I
i
I ?
'
?
it
I
I
I J 1 1
I I I ?i illy''
?

I

1
I

I T

I

?" _

1. I. 1

657
11
1 +
1
1 1 I? f I?io;, 1i
i 1

1 I Jill I I i i1 1
e44
I} 7
r
I}
I}?}

„o r } tf f

6xi I I
4
4 II I ll it 1 III { t 1 1

? Ij
e71 III
I
l

a2s
E
l
T

I

I

I

I I

1

i I
i
l
Ill
7

T
T
1
1
1 v :I
's
?Ra
'oa
- - 8 E " ? E •?
0.00 1.00 7.00 7.00 4.00 5.00
PAGE 8.00
3 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11 00 11.00 13.07 14.00 15.00 15.00 17.00 10.00
PAGE 4
87
87
e7
V
V
es
ae
88
85
85
65
55
05
34
a~
54
84
53
87
e7
S3
93
82
82
82
81
sea 00
0.00 I.00 7.00
48" CULVERT PROFILE
LOOKING NORTH TO SOUTH
PAGE 4
".? .. rln WAM 1'-17 081fA Br: :M
IN J OD0 H4RELDI lm xum RUTHBRFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER W= SUM 1•-loo Mvermm er: lrto
SELL
zom (3 uxLTmH: RUT=ORD COUNTY, N.C. DA 03/04/05 reoncr rce na
153 Ent }Main Surd
7y,'"'?T!? ? For 9 City, N.C. mmrr is ROAD PROFILES ??
06006 9 or is
Q
t III 9a, / U)CM \`b
l u l\ 'yyy„???
IIII I 111 ?(1,?///
k6 am V- I I I
c r ?A A IIII III \ o-111 ?.' ??/ ?AV i ?i J t/I AVA??
?Rr?R'ss s.?y .? 1 I I III , A\V A\ ?? FX G. A s S 11 I 1 I it prTrr ?9 _ III 1 J 1 S 7wI t7 fir/ ?// ?"?' I ?.?\ ?? /? \ ? ?1 ??\ \?? I %////'" ••
r ? ? ??. III11' 11?11?'Jn ?,1111'" L
?i ////// /?• II llIl/_w??? 1 ?? - I )////j/??? ..??v. A
{?, 1 I I ?? ?' 11
ill
i
j?
MEMM t.M I4il,il1lk
I _ __ v _ ?I?,T?,vv
1
\N??\
76jp -/?/
'?? v v V I 1 v - v I I/l//ll )It
Dew
?? ?1 I? ?' II I llI ?/ ?/ 1 ?_, 11 I I/ di / /' 1 \,?) / llr,g\ \ \
ilr (/?, I sr/ 1111 1 \ I llll
1 l l' 11. l +* ,. 1, i v I I I l 1 V I Ill I I
rr / I I I 1 \ 1 III IIl11 I ?\ \?:
I 1l / Il I I
I 1 I? 111I ---- It
?
E ?,? I '?I 1 ' Ill,ll 4?_ ?v? ?- ?1 Ililllnl rll?llll'III,?j // // I l/, /// /--- __ ?- \\ III I I // // ? ?? ? I I Ill Il Ill I
III IIII /? / ,ill /,/ / _ I // I I l 11 I I I I ?? I I I I
ICI I v ?) fl
rlllll r/ I - I // IIII`
I I I i \ '? I 111 I ll/ / / I / I // /// 11 I I I g/l
l,llllll // // / 1 / / IIl/l I //lei--/ // II III I I?? 11
III'1A a-'` ?> ?/Illi Illl ll? I //„ / I I 1 11 II /?
l(
-?-
o-. r
I ,?• V A , I ?l ll,?l it l/rlll??/ ; 1lllll 11 I 1 ?? //( I vA 1 1 ? ' I I /i// i //??/-- ? /i ////// / ? //
?? /o-a ?r``"I / I'l Ir lll? rlll„//•i//// - I li ? / 1 1 I I I / /// ?////?/??--? ii // ///// i /
lllrl
It
-_----
1
i, ? ? 1111 11?\ ???, -??????A1,11•,1/?!?Ill ///;//!?"'?,At --•, l I I I / ? ? -- ?
44 ?V11'1111III?fIII,?/I?//?
1;\111?1\ll'?II;IIII? III' Ilrl I / III /
V0,1IIII?ill11`t?1??\??? X111 I
v A I ? 1 ?\ ?? 1 ? 1111?,1111?,11?1',11:????v II?,JI /
II
??? v ! II l I III1111'Ig\\\\1??,?I?? ii
//// / 1, IIl?llll'1j1?111?;11 W l
N?A\I=' i
?1I.I1111
zo,
'', RRipc ? l?
`R ?y iRDRD \ ?\?t PL? D>03?1?11

\,
","••,.
wit
JOD00
RUTBBftFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER EClll 1' ¦ 100' DRLYN 8L: JIM
r?A ion xlm D= m/a/oa CMEM m: nro
ze tarulotn RUTSERFORD COUNTY, N.C. PROJ= HIM im
151 East %lain Street
N
28043
F
t Cit
C
ous
.
y,
.
82&247
1495 : EROSION CONTROL IAYOUT
011
- 05005 1
6 Q
9sfoI I ?
a
I
1 E_
' sroaACE / 3 \
?? TA?JK ? ? 3 R`,'I?
I EXIST. 12"
SEWER I
Gip r ? ' 8" DIP STUB
3 I 3 OUT
/? 3 I 0--
8" DIP STUB
o OUT I?
.l 3
12" GATE
VALVE
A 8" DIP STUB
- OUT 8" DIP STUB
OUT /
I
2 3 12' GATE 8' DIP STUB
- --------Z-
3 VALVE OUT
cl,
ANT PROPOSED 12" I
OAD p DIP WATER -20 (6 % LINE
1ICif
I
8" DIP STUB 3 8" DIP STUB
OUT 3 OUT
70 12* VA GATE /
I VALVE ?
I F / 3 __--- _ -
I 11 S ? ? ? ?
20
\ I
I REMOVE EXIST. QAP AND / l
I TIE TO EXIST. 12"`WATER
LINE
I cq-
-20 - W W \W W ti?o
r EXIST. 12"
WATER LINE
yo C?
/ TEE v
8' DIP STUB
OUT
THRUST 9MCKING
3 /
TYPICAL 8' SN9 ("TTYPICAI. DETAA
wcs
\ $T alt BY Da _
? 3 PyF9\
/ 4/ CFOj?? W412: I' ¦ aw ere 8A xv
' x- RUTHSRFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER DAM 03/04/05 c2mcm Irrj n
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C. PROXICT rce i i
tounm 3 M E.,t>I,ia Street
?tL \ Eoe t City, C28043 mzsmmnmt WATER LAYOUT in oaom 1t?ie -
[ &
L
Aff
0+00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4+00 5.00 6+00 7.00
h g/Z" J /
?J J
/ Q

J

/ w
??x9o / / 1170 '
N7
x w
P RM 81N
NV N 6311. NY N
.1 NY M 66370
NY M b7.2e NV CUT 66350
o-
J MV OUT 931.04
Ry ??
/ 1063% R`Y 39r
/ V
,
Nu RV
W
? RJ

V \
V Rv
5
R
R
R
'd
? werz6
R
sroae? w
??l J TANK a1Tw olpnj'.2
NY OUT 911.14
wdrze
siaadc[
Td N
X I WATER
= R
x
i
ELTMA
I'
0
O ?P, 66 / / I 1
aJ ?? MY OUT 63.24
` 57,{ 6..2
MU 67795
VETLANDS i NV ouT ben
1 y
} 1
n
1 t
rx Yl 01
6r1 0.00
PoY 667.25
MY N 661 25 L
MY OUT 661.03 r
P /
/ RJ
VETLANDS
10 in xam RUTlIBRFORD 74 CORPORATE
CBNTHR
6 b.
152 e6n Main Street IDPA9mn FOREST CM, N.C.
F-t City, N.C. 28043
828-247-4495 mmpn n SEWER PLAN & PROFILE
4iPJ11 mm 1? ¦ 1 6LYN 6h xv
M. ¦1
cm= an nA
DIE.` 07/4/06 P1Dncr mm dD
7O81fUxRM 7'mzrn
06000 12 OF 16 Q
0.00 1.00 2+00 3.00 4+00 5.00 6.00
0100 1.00
z

'va
?>E
F_sd
910
930
932
928
921
920
Jill 11111
91e
912
oos
904
900
e9e
ma
W4
am --iTT
en
en
A?TV A
macro
0100 1.00 2100 3.00 N00 3.00

? Q

h Q

4' Q•
w

/
o 3. X51
/
NV N 919.99 wy
SiF 51218
/

n NV OUT 919.79
8
1
J
_
RN
NV OUT OUT 936
43
'
8 h (Q10) C e h ^
ll.eef 51 x
.
a SO) 0. RC 2417Y
-
- -
Ad - Ad Ad Ad Ad
-I
STA MOO

9N aaO 59
NV /

17,
I 01031
NV N 07031

.I ? Nv IT Ginn /

/
Q'
QP

Y
9
9'
?
3 /
/

MT PLEASANT
CHURCH ROAD
'R 1906
R/P DITCH
TO DITCH
J
DOMH
O
in xam
RUTBSFtFORD 74 CORPORATE
ENTER
C
--
zeen , o:

?N9Q'
• 152 East Main Street

2804 :8013
N
C
Forest City

wriaot(: FOREST CITY
r N.C.
A?'?.tl???'' ,
.
.
828-2474495 SERER PLAN & PROFILE
E ALM 3' 1' ¦ 1
' DUYN $ri JIM
¦ 10
U.: 1 Brt D7o
DAM 07/1/06 p2GmIM RIM Ad
70D Numcm X14
00000 13 or 16 0

I

I
I
]
I
t`
I
II
i
I eo
"?a
??-

I
7
II
I i
I I I I ? II
I

I

I I I I
? I. I ryU.
? I I I1
II I II I I - I I II I I II I
? I I I I I1 1

I I

l I 1

I1 ?I
I d
a
I
I
I
I
I
II
I I l i I I
' Ji ll

d ?
{1
¦ I

T i
` i;
t y?
!
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
? I I I I I I I I

I I
I I I
I I
I
1 1
1 I
`I
k I I

I
I
I it I
I
II

I

II
I
II I

II

I

5/0' TNPEADfD ROD
(GALVW Q
DIIWIMJS COATED) 2' PLUG M
STANDARD RDW-OFF
e _
2*XZ
PAD NIL
RING
ME
TYPICAL HYDRANT
1LM
CONCH
AU
PLAN
4'1;?4n '1-11'
WATER
1 MAN
DONCPETE -
71 MUST
IR06 '1 II -,i i t
UINSARAC9
EARTH
ELEVA710M
11-
NOTE&
1. FITTINGS SHAM BE DUCTILE RON MECHANICAL
jow Firms DESG ED AND UAMFACTURU7
As PER ANMA CI53 AM RATED AT 200 PD. RTiNCS
SMALL BE IlED ¦TH CEWNT MORTAR WIN A SEAL
Of 1111AMOUS MATO6ALS AS PER AMA 0101.
PLAN
IN91m OGOC 11010 'EA1CR' UST N 701
RR"S PRODUCTS
CaOETE CALM FOR
VALVE BOXES
YW
COVER
Ur ua oPUAnm Nn
00WACim 6A02{L
D1[NSH01 'A'
I-
[zi
ELEVATION
02E 11.23 Rs t3 1M7 iQS 8116
t 12 12 12 16 16 14
6 12 12 12 16 16 1t
0 12 12 to 22 22 16
10 12 14 20 20 25 22
12 12 16 24 32 32 25
14 14 20 26 36 36 32
16 16 22 32 42 42 36
16 16 26 36 48 45 w
20 20 26 w 52 52 u
24 7t % b 64 61 54
30 JO w 56 76 76 66
36 3e SO 70 61 a 60
42 w x m 106 106 62
48 N se 60 124 124 104
TYPICAL THRUST BLOCK
uu

SELECT NATW AL 4ECHANICALLV '^1? v
CORACND N 6' EFTS 12 GAU(E [OPP'F71

• TRACER WIRE
c?l SECURED TO PIPE
NOTE. BELL HOLES NOT SHOW NA.
24
12• uN y Nex
e' u -,
MR WMWUM 36' COVER 3

1?1
p
rif

SELECT NATERAL
TAMPED N 6' Ills
FIB

?-, I II I' II'II II 'If - JIaU
U1E5nFSm EARTH
OR ROCK
TYPICAL EXCAVATION
FLT.1
?'? caoET[ s..n
or m wmi
TYPICAL GATE VALVE
KM
SEE sa Wx
COVM OETAIL
?ioioiglFll[ = IC71 Ji oio?i
OP 7 0(TR26 OF
9R WAX
a
_ L
w
vER AD
PER ASN C"3 & C023
Jowl
matt.oT
(ral
PRECAST
t,AAtat
STEPS STNAIT WILL d LLM
TO R LOCATED OSQ
IWLIO,T /K
r LOA BUM
PLOSCR SEALANT
4*-e OR 5'-W
y?
i
man aWa
sat Ia'-f
PRECAST MANHOLE (475' DIA.)
ILL&
PLAN VIEW
k.L&
PROFILE VIEW
T
,,*I T4"
0 ? 0
$1ET
COVER IAE
t{D•
mTa 6Aa
FRA[ PLAN
ut/v
slsui TO
BE MACHINED
/r
COVER SECTOR
ESTMA7ED M£1(i1T >},
la wtxT
LOAD MTW O - HEA- OM X-I
nW( DAD ,LS
. 5
M=.
TOTAL 365 Nl1
MAW SEC"
MANHOLE RING k COVER
ILT3
,.u..,.., ??. CDAPA= SELECT
BACOILL TO 91X
C:a:., sAOraD rwacTa
1
CRAM 7:1
II I? 91FII
77, tll r wA4mOR` m-
i 3L ySSt,;t{{,3 'i
_ - Sta( (ma. 57) , iSL.:.'+c'N'? A$? i'?' ?'1 '•
rAlnt _, -
ND m K t06w WERAL PIPE UM ,tn mw J cowN EAST K DIP
PLASTIC LATERAL USE A TI T LESS NAOT FOR iTNN9TO1
,X To BEDDING FOR SEWER
ALL urovu A IILi
sorAa tp lJIIDq
GRAVEL 6EOD.00
e Int PK
SEWER LATERAL
Itu
--'l [--s/o
R' 24"
"
6-
6-
6"
1" RADIUS
11"
ea
1" RADIUS
a
a d e Q
d a
d G
a
a
as
: Ir
IUto
L a" AND MUTTER 70 K On1R CTM N 10 MOT IDODM
=NCH MAN" JOET 1rwL K PROW ED AT K11"ALS NOT TO
tO FEEL AT M ENDS AND IaPOET O R[TI.IN2 AND AT ANY
PMJ NOt M Ml OHIO AND OUTMt ANM ODQ CONCRETE
110 FOOT LOW TAAIQD7O 71YL K PROMM BETWEEN POOm ORO
AND VALLEY CLIRL
30" CURS AND CUTTER
MM
- r H 9A9tpAAIL 901Fr4 rAaST
•' o-a?ml
r ax>m AooMUrz ua mrs
1Y Q]/ACIM RM-AAY (IOOR sm.)
PAVEUENT SECTION
Fm
ENTRANCE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY - 80'
31' ASPHALT WIOTH
1/4?/TT 1/4'/FT
ROD CRARO D CROSS S CTION
MM
r 1 a
i A ? ? """ •• ° ?- - ? voeluort era
]I 9.6E A IV.MR .lt rA.cu. irs aao lol.c
LR:'Or°?A ?, '.`?? J M? - ..n,ucAy pluepr... 701t1
? TYN ? _M.uur ely .r M! '- Ay. 01on.e
c
_ we ooo Bonn
i
ipI0t0 fertlliten Ia00 ,a1.0
cosAClO Sty i..a- XK3S LhlrIt
ALL OTHER SUar4ES
\ TRAM:9 nu remu. loo lol.c
.. ?? ). cC'"+ t, - s.rcce le.r.e.n hon. a oles 1.1Z
It, w Le.P.d.n tl.c
Ay. .001D!.c
-} i1 u. ear ll.' . oD inl.c
TEMPORARY BERM DETAIL , w Ir '7 a ky y?? o a o r..llllr.r ooo ltlnc
NLS 1 ew N y Fr .000 lb/.c
Jul
swamill
r
--
L GR.IYHL - ?? 0uTlZT' 1 L'?" SURTAC6 ?? ltIDID
':?G?'?'••?•-••• , ?ENNTRA?NCL II1T PROTLCIIDN ? ? ?.. ?... ? ?.T 1>71? ROOG?CIINC sw.eA I..y ?s. wo is?
GENERAL "Olm /
L. OMY 06TH CLEAR OR INAK MEAL W=ARY FOR OM[AICTa C65M11C11014TRACAMMS E1NSmLA'Mel SROr,CATINS COn51pU Col SPECFCA`M0 CCWIST"Myd 9-EOrr.M"
FIAT ON OOlEltHISE ON[AM ARAB NOT 10 K 0611RNm. OM111DO EAU (Aug Id . D.C ISI
101CO AND CORMIIC 1ON EDlORfOFT FROM MEE NEAR 1o PROERit 1. r- .egad. for the A. -4 dpr p 1. Pt n
ere L SLOPCS A
1. CL- the -trxe Red -it e'N a a wptabA W61T1COEN FATEMAL y. 10r.rn1 laa lel.a
NA uuL 1LD[TANII d ode Cmpact a Z2. F q, .Arad. to
4 ad otw aRcttme mal.M rk er-en, 1. U. Apgrtk R,r IaOrk or prbr d,Rel of I. Plan A aop. F IRA ReI to au.d P Feae and
2 CLEAR AND ON AREAS TO K FILLED TO ROOK TR= INUM DILL roo It. Ina -y a w wy w.lv°.d molAoI e.-A M F Pwrl r mrycted
pool the eAeraa "I u.aeueeed ea mq vdAwafM Eel-% payee-. or vaeegPr+ Pm -
W
MUCK. P ? a OTHER F O M W MA- IANI WIDW THAT INID AFFECT i Pqp q HR, to V-4 RPRRvft km ant Wo" b"0" F MkA IA Mgad ° "-1-b or u.Ww u x E- qty
M qty M of the daps --.W of loo- nUrt[A/EAaLr SPAnG
PINTED !RAl7M °" by Faeaei5 rrop qMn- by IEeh t err 15)
dRe-aT1 moan M q1 plyd, ra rroaq K Woo be RW by b haAT a mFF.w rt.Fp emar,ry of 50; Irwe rmryactad A d to 6 o o Face der. Ay. IOr.to) 110 lol.<
1 NAM FILL N LAMM NOT TO DOTED r N TIKES! AND OM/ACT M a Prmide Jaaq to err .atr to W sn.,l x nlr aoq, olr uRed nrl mwl dReIT rerAr eb. th a w R/F (ameaa) or ]o R/F (.roa ] oma ueFp Re -prarrte FdemRet gat ea
LAVERS AS RDA?ID TO TO REDOIZ ERCSKK 1RPAOE, SETILD01% OR trop. le and be potrtd can pndFp or ,wFr e." ) a LOR aapalth ad a w.r doe roe be e.Wy Aorota ar dop. Do not Rae Papre .are.n l..p.dee. sty lel.c
Old RELAID FRmLR All oa-&Aq pFt. W-m -lop a Faa 1'.
l ILIA 011Op01A AND 010011,103 AM l1Dd MTER OM1t1'ARCt ItAlRSS aMlol OL3 ra°dI,H-- w addare ? CeA I, aue- looe toot ] Far dwo e ,or U-I the Is pone. -at
a Ayry mar Re Add . I, r roAgh yvry oar L." ... lal.c
FIQ Cr SMIDET AT ALL TAeE1 ma qe -eaed ueoae pre a 0-170 d.?y r mF. ° 4. a oe not °bee ar eoOq. w IFe slope ral.
It d oM be lad mrly hlydp nagr'neMmt ILO tO ]ED Inl.c
w ?? SLOPE $ AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN .tr.r .000 lci.c
0, land M !R?Att O ALL NOES DLIM M OIQIRRIION OUATd X E- qol b a. 1.13 lb/ft etw elq a mFFVn
M RETAIN NITER, NOKA1[ NFLTRATOL AND FAOSTAI[ VENTATIa 4, Ca-b A °. opra °" ers rode eft ne a r- I ;E. of e pW
ra a the rd Foe qe lRe of ar'o'ap a dr
L RREDOEIY STABLIM ALL ORATED AREAS YEOaIIY AFTER MIAL -- Red lNa rq pr rwaAy np or dwroy owp"? of °l
woe It A,% a+Fa hwwi,0 or w of a mOtbaar-
aAOFD 6 D9/tlTm DI EACH AREA APPLY TOfaARE ME-%UM ON ALL a E- Vat Sr ra- N pnpel, amore aq the CO.STRIXOe ne?gil of Is,- dome not -Red 1! o- wear. IW IM RW pre a -y e- IRaa
a R AOM -DA IId IqN D TO K MNOVIED OR ODA71D FOR tt rwwq boon w rdrdlr bawl gmwwl n•n,ca .Wnent - the -nlar.
tA71DD OAYI ON b CALENDAR DA1t It k.^ It . -e to nwedd plan A F the uror x IAw lom+e e1 dud F%A-t. does
a d,e ?? Carbvel idrlp fro. a-tFara b oA to Iraq la-gr < 10 idr) rM not Ir two 1 FA deep.
FinaM/, oAtr oonbucliol etdM d M6NK of b- to eW Awt. 11M pFb ee ncewaA L En4w ro.1- F w.fek a
olq ege,d, Iwl- the Db cloth -Ip a e ropat
rdetalb Fnnedlol/, Reed ad nhdd, i-rwu0 real to abF
pool aq Frnp to p MA Pwt oplennn Reed prn'i'ota W rar1A Prbdb,lr and
a SuPPrt amdad = Abk e°A aid mesh the seeded W.... b rRe aM .aFe. M tlu-
Roo d . 4 ,rdope e'Re a poet wq sew /Ir,tl, odor tlr r4Fa rod. r-ea red
hear a'y die elopwo a loom 1' lay EA "HI nhe m,Ad w coon - poReel.
,nM to eolbn a tr
UANTEIVACK PLAN
L Al eeeda W 90dord anbul FrN1aRe M
be drAr or arty mew atre.. NRee.
wrY ewR-/pOAI 1aR1 M N " eaaL
riol Ana p.rY wf. elf eW np? eA M
Ill?(aL Flmtll- s
Ryeedftr,?re/llAAe66rJ to a
2 4ei-d M be lwreel Idled Ir eellr6
fan a Th R Lena rMM1 0? der a IM
feedA The ded.rd fare i M lopdr aR
3. F YtrlrrsY .dk-A tra Y der m
eeaeA eeear derA to
ee0eedlw demo. t1n(? ion mom RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE ScLm ILTS.
I.N?-M?I?rer-apM w lalre` r-eded e
aNR.a WL b I.iIAI R MP-? `R Rer-

F cS D61f CENTER ma 03/3/03
zemsl? `? `''" urAT . FOREST CM, N.C.
152 E.,t Nfein Steel

Txr. ?? `. Forest City, N.C. 28043
8:8-2074495
n1 S PJW/EROSION CONTROL
X3 XCIMER:
DETAIIS
041101 HT1=
ewww1m 411 mm
FROM= VCR! nu
EEX3Y
to OF is
r
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
!P`,
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ag(r7Z?-_-J?1?177
i
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit JUN 7 2005
® 401 Water Quality Certification
F-1 Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules of"R ; `?„? `'`'`"j{
1'r'ETLf,1?'DS NO Si GR..,ti+N1 i=R bi1,,.1XN
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rutherford County
Mailing Address: 289 North Main Street
Rutherfordton. NC 28139
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address: jcondnblueridge.net (John Condrey, County Manager)
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Odom Hollifield & Associates Enizineering
Company Affiliation: Consulting Engineer
Mailing Address: 152 East Main Street
Forest City, North Carolina 28043
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jonhollifieldnodomenizineerint?.com (Jon Hollifield, P.E.)
Page 3 of 3
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Rutherford 74 Corporate Center
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): parcel # 1634517 and 1634518
4. Location
County: Rutherford Nearest Town: Forest City
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Rutherford 74 Corporate Center
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Highway 74, Old Caroleen Road
Exit, turn right at top of ramp, site is less than'/4 mile on left.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N 35 18 54/ W 81 49 26
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Currently the land is not used.
7. Property size (acres): 92.95 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Second Broad River
9. River Basin: Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/adinin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 4
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a road for a future industrial park
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: dozer, front end loader,
compactor
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: rural/residential/ industrial
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application:The future development of the industrial park may require additional permits. This
permit includes needs for the primary entrance and road throui4h the park. As other businesses
join the park in the future there may be a need to apply for permits if the future buildings or
roads make an impact.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/`Vaters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 5
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 Fill 0.09 yes Immediate area Forested wetlands

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Scrvice Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.eov.
*** List a Nvetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltrivater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 1.43
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )
1 Culvert 231 UT to Second Broad 1 ft. Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
?rlvw.uses.eov. Several intcrnct sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., xww.topozone.com,
Nv%v1v.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 231
Page 6 of 6
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The requirements for the industrial park are to limit the road Grades to 6% in order to provide for
heavy truck access. This created a fill depth requirement of 35 feet. This is unavoidable.
Additionally, we have provided for 2:1 side slopes on the fill even though we would have
preferred 3:1 (which is what is provided for in the rest of the park). Given the road width
requirements for access with the shoulder width requirements for utilities the impacted distance
is as small as possible.
Page 7 of 7
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The County plans to pay into the NCWRP at the required rate of $205/ LF of stream impact
at a 1:1 ratio.
Contact has been made with EEP. The "In Lieu Fee Request Form" was faxed to Carol Shaw
on 6/1/05.
Page 8 of 8
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.ushvrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 231
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federaUstate/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 9
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* s hn eact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Lone 1 extends out 3U icct perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
As shown on plans
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer plans have been included to give detail on gravity sewer and pump station proposed
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No F?l
Page 10 of 10
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
- je 6-1-2oo-,
Appli t/Agent's Signature Date
(Age 's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Anny Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Suny
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Anny Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 11

i 8
80
I / 878 p' °j
? I I 21 2
?
RIPIR /
876
R
p
u
3d
a
c
o

-
874 ? t
? 0
I z v
INV.
OU

872

?

LO
833.4'
TSP 01 TS I l i l I I I I I ? ? ? » ?

?

'

870 I U- 23 2
_
LENGTH 13 LENGTH -
? 1 1 I i 1 1
v?grH - 2(y VA TH - zz' 868 1 I II I i N i I i i 1 i
I
DTP -2 ?DEP i t l ilt) i i t I I I
'EI - 4' IR - 866
?
IMP CTED I 86 1 1 1 ( ? co
kTLANDS\ - 4 1 1 1
1 I ! I I ro
ARE a
ov 86 I 0
2
I
o
860 i j R ? n
N Cp I
858 I d j I

z o?
00
^

l
j
9
0
1 ?
856
6
_
v

854
I 1

s

?
11 i I
z
>
I
? I
I
?
I
85 1 1 1 _ _ 1
/ 2 5 i
?+ o 850
"
?
1
j l
i I I

/
?
I
848
I N I
- t
1
I I
?
??
j
?
I
)
I

? 1
(
IC
I
?I
j

0o
2+
846 I I I I IIi
I i i I 1 1
1 1
6?--•-
?
? ,
I
?
I
I
I ,.
?? ?
?,
?
1 844

/`
842 I I °I I

840

838

I 8,36 ilG RHK i 44? i1

o_
834 1
D EEK
832 B, AN ? ?111?11
6" `
8,30 UL> ON
BED-dF RUSHED
231 FEETrF STREAIA
NOTE 828
:
WILL B DISTURBED I l l 70N? .
1

826
I
1
11111 "
/
/
I 1
I II
1
1111
8
4 1 ? 0N
F

/
2
I
I _
$
?
E
( I I I
I

• I I I
!.
? A u
A I I I I 1 1 1 '"7
h?

? 822

I

1

I

I

I I I

1

C~
??(+
I
I
I
DATUM ELEV 1 1 ti
TEM BERM 00
820 ?
.
t Lq
LO N
0)
0)
m
C co 00 00 co Cc)
O
NGI 209 F. OF 48' RC
G / ® 3. SLOP 1
L NG ?
D 36' /

EP 2' 7 IN 842.0 /
/
I TSP t2 /
0+
00 1+00 2+00

ENTER LINE OF

(

N
(O

?

^
N

?

(

C

n
(D
D
O

n
?

?

L

r

n
?

r

r

?

?
ro

n

?
?

o

d
?

r

?
?

c

c

a

d
p

n

o
s

te

0)
ro

r.

4
?

fi

U
ap

r. 1

E
p

`

DD
?

r

ii
?

?

loo
?

?

co
U)
LENGTH - 11
/ DTH
WEIR 4'2
I I l l 48" PIPE LOOKING
NORTH TO SOUTH
10
+
0
0
11
+
0
0

CE

N

T

ER
12
+
LI
0
N
0
E

O

F

R

O

A
13
D
+
00
14+00
,?run(irrrr
CA
Ro
JOB NAME: RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER ..
SCALE: 1 = 100
DRAWN BY: JCW
p1py T% ,.....
0 ESS70
?.' LOCATION: RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C.
DATE: 5/25/05
CHECKED BY: DWO

X 2 1 _ PROJECT MGR: JFH
152 East Main Street 31-05 c
,
` PROJECT NUMBER SHEET
Forest City, N.C. 28043
828-247-4495 2 :,'0 UG1NE,•
,''"t'ID(r(0?o?``` DESCRIPTION: PLAN & PROFILE OF CREEK CROSSING 05005 1 OF 1 0

ENGINEERING PLANS FOR:
RLT111FMP%..1F0PJD 74
CORPORATE CET4TOER
PROJECT LOCATION:
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER:
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
INDEX
SHEET TITLE SHEET
COVER SHEET 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
UTILITIES LAYOUT 3
ENTRANCE MODIFICATIONS 4-5
ROAD GRADING/PROFILES 6-9
EROSION CONTROL LAYOUT 10
WATER LAYOUT 11
SEWER LAYOUT 12-13
WATER DETAILS 14
SEWER DETAILS 15
DAM LARCH 4, 2005
PROJECT NUMBER: 05005
DRAWING NAME: PHASE 2
PROJECT MANAGER: JFH
DRAWN BY: JCw
CHECKED BY: DWO
NO DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
STREET/EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 16
LEGEND
EXISTING WATER LINE
- - - - PROPOSED PROERTY LINE
-X-X- EXISTING FENCE
-E-E- EXISTING POVER LINE
- zv - Rw - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-VAY
-RV-RV- PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
--o----o-- EXISTING FENCE
PROJECT BOUNDRY
?-Y
lqy EXISTING HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
PROPOSED HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
x EXISTING GATE VALVE
W PROPOSED GATE VALVE
6 EXISTING SEVER MANHOLE
® PROPOSED SEVER MANHOLE
ii PROPOSED CURB INLET
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
***CAUTION***

NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL

n ? 3 DAYS BEFORE DI=NG CALL
TOLL FREE 1-800-0.72-4949

f ?w
-1
O) * V M upll1177 9M ARE 940M TOR M CONMACiwi Cowl E CL 04Y. MI[
BC OMII UTLTMS wr SMM w nRS RLARS M Di0im1 A59M3
BO
0 \ (ij
V RL9VR9BLRf ROR M LOCARMS 940'M A 0 R 9 BE M (RAIL CIOR7
Q4O...u I W ACIRIT M L uu" V ALL mms ¦t-I M Wm V M

l/j -
-
n J ?J 8 ALL DmB c wllc m LM1 umTES BY M CWTRACMR SMALL BC M
SOLE REEF" TT OF M Cw1RAC1UL

'J

Ov ?

152 East Main Street
Forest City, N.C. 28043
828-247-4495
VI'-IN[I T Mnr
(not to scale)
l e
I S? /
1
I ? W SSSS
OD rom 1
S REMOVAL
0
X04 I //%//// ,O O J ? ?? w SSS 1
/ OCw Il\\ _
Wn\ / / t
"a cIy,P I I I?/I??/??c C SUS ?//DTI I ?? v I
A , I 6' N-,l /
II I ///r x ,yam 0 car= SEVER / \
411
III111 /////i,? vVAv 11
??1----- - I //?// IIA\ V m
\111'x, _ ?/' v 1 1 I ;? ,/ / iii r? • 5111VAA?I, /?%/j//?' 1 111 Io
?s, I ?x %?%_\VAA1VA\\vv?? / I 1
11AVA\\\\I??/
1 III 1111,/ ///-\ / \1 I III I/ , ?x •/?? ?1 r ?? \\\._. W
1,T `°i11A ?- / v v\ vI?\A vJ 111''I I ?r??/? _?=i% ^ ; l / /..?r ?\ \\??= r I IIII
yC F?f ?j \`// /'? \ 1 11111 1\\\\\\\\ Q.?\?
gq Hq?NT \ ?_?? \ \ \ ? 1 \\ \ \ ? lo
IgQ .10 1 / / ? 1 1 \ \ \ \ ') 1 l ? - -? ? - l I / \ I J / ? 1
?_ A v 11111 11v 11 I ?l,_ lI i ,???? i / 1 \\ ,/i,
a/T ?? -_' \ 1` 1 1 1 111,11111 W I I I I
ecnuos
l
IN
-, 1 v 1 1 Ill l; I I, 1 X11; II; I .i I IIII ?/? s Ivy ?1 J/ 1 I i/??? t v
I I i I / / r !! r II ?: /ii - ? 111 // ? / VA VA ?1 ? /// )/ llI r11?! ? ? ??V ??1\ \' \
I
VAnV1\1?
/41??i/?
Il
ll(l - //
/ \IIIU 1V
(l / , ?jl' o- ????vv 1 ` / ? ?//' // / /// / _- // - ,; ?? ?--.?, /r 111 ? // ? 11 , ?v v?v
\\Vv A
?vvv, v?
yV\
„TOTAL SITE ACREA v A I Il ?/ \ \
vv
-e2:96;acr'ea v ?? 1 A 111 L % / \ ?wIA\\\\v \ \
, \ , A
v . I I I I Il,'lll ;' //?? 1 Vv_> .111; Il lQ_i
///? 111?? / 1 l?
1 I 1 \ 1 1 ? \ 1 ////////III
It
C 1„ I?I, I . ICI ?-? ?? v ? ;III llllti ?_? /// /'/ .o---? I /l I ) A \ ll /l I ?\ \\
If a
I I I ??r_? a ? - 1 I? IIII Ii1? ? /// , I I _ _ I 1 /l /I I , ?? \ 11 1
E= I??1 I iI11I?Illllillvo-?`'- v,; ?? ? ?1 Ililll'I ill I?Ilr,j // / / l// /// / - - ?' A\ v111 ? 1 1 l Ill I
I // I Il/ lI l I II
I I 1111( I1?? I Il 1 III / / / I
I
?V l 144 l lr/ / //// III/ I, - //I li // l A\A 1 V / // lJ ///j // ?
/-- _i
„ /ice JIII ,III I I V1 V / / I??/
i'lll;;IIG????? //
(1/<?
I , 1 11 \ .-? ??? I I'I
? ? ?? 1 111 1 vA?'^? , ?? v11,11,1 //!,
I °' ?? V 1 I 1 A V ??? ? VvA ,I1111I1?111! III l rl//r / /? / / l/ l ?
1??6 1 V \ \\v 11??1 ???\' \?\1 ?1111111?111111111??II1, III?II?I?J/? lI l l ?
1 \ \\ ?? ?? \ ? Il 1 1 111111\ I I I I I I
\ i ?? \ 1? 1111v I ' J
Al
a ? ? A I r 1 ? \? vI 111 IIII III ? 11'11\??\\ ? ? ?? 1?1 I i I I /
I ?..? ?/ V 1 . II X111111,1Vv?vVv?-?I,
??d Jr- 1 I I ? 1 \, \\\
? W,•?o v vv 1 / 1 Illil 11111 111vvA111 '?lllil
?v v J 1 1 1 1 I, Avv i' I I•I' I
"? ?// / l? IIII I11 1 vI1 I
/ / / / // I ,l IV1Av\I?I1!111;, Jl' 11 I a? DDCffiTMN
I/ I I r, I\ I r 1111vVA? ?1•
\
. / I ?J 1 1 1 I WAM [' ¦ IW
I I I 1 i I 1 1, ) ' , ,+ `.. BDQmo in xam RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER n
j Zo 111 I 1) F'a?
BPO \ / zeazz Sic; tncinoxi RUTHERFORD COMM. N.C.
152 Cut Stun St,ae
Fu tCay,NC:B6i3 ESISTlNG CONDITIONS Jos xorEM
=Kzwmb
\',?R P.tI;•• 828-:71-4495
00006
MLTx BY. wr
C®C= Rn M
PRO= kqm am
Sri
a or is
0
I ??'?? , -rrrryrr llt
? / 1 1 / / 1 q `//?? ??)` \? /? ///? 111111 m
I? 11,?r= \ I u
1 I , , ,? \ 1 \\ / /// 11
..111. / - `? - ,-
sRHRG"T 1 `---? . \ \ 1 1\ \\ \\\\ ?\ 1 1 I l,ll ( - ////-- \ \ I)/ii/;
R?»'go -77
1 1111 1111\ v ?? 11 1 11 I I r ??i ??? - I I //i Vii, v
?00jryH .? \ \ AV 1 I I 1 I I 1 J 1 1 III l! / 4J/ //' , -?i6 , ?-? VA?? J - /?1 PAM#
1 - V 1 111111' I1?11?1 \ A111i1? Illy 11// // / II ??-?w? ????? v? ?°
i i 1 A A V i11 1 1 I , I I 1 1 11, , ! // j. ??, II IIl// 11/- WEnnN'S
STOW or
\ --' \ I 11 l i llll I ll??? l l ?? , W'PAtfewi
711
Illl, ?Q' '? 'i ,?i vv f v /ir r/? I III it %?A\ X11 v
"IX
III I ?.vv
Mts
/i //i _ \ \ 111?? I III %, \\?\ \ \\\
\\\
W\\\\\\\\
\ \
' \ ull i. ' i / l l v vV vv 1 1111 vv _? v I / /l)
,G
,? US
PACS
I r /' //A/1
\?;
11111''
I I 1 ?l ' v l?lll? „ILI lll;ll //// / ?Jll 1,/// // /-_---_ v 1 1 I // I l i // !I I 1 ?? II I
?i w I I I+, _4 ? )1 I 1,,x,1 ? \ ? -acv 1 1, sr?J!+ai7?ll,?'ll/'llu 11 Illl // ;/ 1 , / ! /v ?/?lI II I I
kl?lt ?'? ,' I 1 ?w I ?//,llll y Il l Pwacf,,,i?/
r?l ?' _ _? / I l? '?? \ I + • ? ? ' ' ? - l ?,??„' Vii' ? vv ? l I , ? / I I 1 V I I l / / l t - /i // ?,, ? - - ? _ ? // /? //?/ /// ? / //
J??--%ii
?_» l////?/_?A\ 11111
l/
??? V I I ' cA??? ??? `?,A 1? 1'I 1 II t ,ll/r l / l ! 11 l
v? I) ? v ??? vv 111 ?I1'll,?lilil, 'I!`I I, l / !
?/? ??' I 1\ \V 11? ? ? ?\? `VA 11111111'i1j1?1????1111(? ,lil?l? i I I !? I ? ,/
v A v v?v , t l 1 I I I I? 11` 1?1A\?. ? 1 ? I l
?? ?? v / ? ,1v ? ? A 11 1 I I II Illlllllli?A? ?vv`? . ??I? II /
",'?o V v I I l 1 I??, ? 11 ? 1111111 h11Vv??\?'t ?? II
,I I
N,
,' ?/ / II l l ?I Illy 1 I Ili
! , I , 1
.I ICI
pow 1? ? l l ? r
"?
sq

N,

SCUM 1' • 100'
ODOMBO in ml- RUTHERMRD 74 CORPORATE CENTER um 03/04
/05
1???+1
zeazz 5 q `' wamm, RUTHEMRD COUNTY, N.C.
>r' 152 F.,t M.i. street
Ft?\?,•' Farm City, N.C?6017 N01C?
;yA'P.Fl :.•' 829-2174195 UTMTE3 LAYOUT 05005

nf, 1Cw
annm
mm i n
szzm
3 01 16 Q
MAGNEDC
- RW
200' TAPER
RW
' EDGE OF NEW
T 62U LANE
EDGE OF NEW
DECELERATION LANE
EXIST. EDGE
OF PAVEMENT
gi

b $k I ea IV.
?ykbb
A B
$?? R $?
00'
1 TAPER ?x
a Y
A 10'%TO' \ I 1af STORAGE
SIGHT TRIANGLE
PROPOSED TRAFFIC
EXIST. EDGE ISLAND
la n OF PAVEMENT PELL SOlYi-, ASE R'GHT CIF
EDGE OF NEV wer S! s?, EASaEAT, 96
see/'st
la 'r it R? 1RiRU LANE
EDGE [IF NEV
n \ I ^ ACCELERATION LANE
la K W K
R40' PROPOSED NEV R/V
- B
Io•x2a GD
S \ SIGHT TRIANGLE I00 TAPER LARRY D. CnmDSTA F
S50/!7S
y A RNa e 100' STOR
,Oa STORACE I
I
INXSTMAL PARK
LOTJI
MDIISREAL PARK
LOTJIO
ENTRANCE DETKIL
SCALE 1'-Ja
q
EXISTING ROAD RIOT OF WAY - 60'
5' 20' ASPHALT MOTH 5'
174'/FT 174'/FT
ROPE SLOPE
EXISTING ROAD CROSS
SECTI9?J
INTO
q

I k R - DV
EXISTING 20' ASPHALT WDTH PROPOSED 20' A HALT W.OTH
i74:/FT 1 4•/F
PAVEMENT
OVERLAY PASS THRU ACCELERATION
LANE LANE
DN
R-a ROAD CROSS SECT)
m
E 1-2 COPACTED
SURFACE COURSE
C TYPE HS BNIAaNOIIS HIED, DXX6E
M TWO Y COMPACRD Lm
rC GASO M TWO Y COIPACTC9
I
INTA N01R TACK CDAT
NOTE: CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF ANY
PAVEMENT MARKINGS DISTURBED OR COVERED BY OVERLAY.
TIPICAL ASPHALT PAVE7!ENT OVERLAY
rs
A-A ROAD CROSS SECTION
m
MAGNETIC
PF
703."Al
Rw
RW
R V V _ `Y ?
j EXIST, /V
NDVSTRAL PNK
OTJI
I 10ir0 \
b?aay ? W
RW
?0
a? 1
R W
OID C1Tt0IyyN ROdD
'
80

L .Epp
SWMC-E BELL Fiat 56
WAY S. [AiM,Vt, 596/197
POLMTRIAL PARK
Lo' X
ENTRANCE DETAIL
n 1 1 uRar o. canosu?r
1 s6op?s
1
X11

<R
/ /I I / / / \ \ I 510?A?F \ \ \ 1 1 1 I
.05
/ ?? \ \ \ \ \ Of 110fb EET.OtI \ \ 1 0 }97fE I I
lOP OP N00a 23 \ // -\ \ ` ? \ \ NV`gIT E90.S Ji LY. OF
1 1 ` ? I I I ? I I I 1
RIP 6?2
Gs?
OF HOOD M 4 32 LY. OF 18-\
i,1
I s• i
RIPR
NV.
lz- RY Ha6& 17/ /
/ .. INV. e6a49
-10 NY.. OUT 9115 \ RCP • 6; SLOPE 1 ] ? ? l
TOP OF ? ? i? a ex soaa
aHOOD n?
NV. N W6.57 I
?YV. E61.7) / I
I.oo ? ? / / O Il
a ou
1
?. W 1 X19 Cr.aW R I
ANT - \ 1 I s9' Er. or iat I 1 / / 7 14 UZO J I
OAD
\ i -Top-b"
7H OOO seta IN,
NY,
979.9 b
1
iOP OP X 9125 / REP 0 s 586[
A\ ??
NV. OUT 9115
v I J HOW90121-
?_ A I Nv ar a94.3a \W\
Slf1PE?
ROP0A9216
SSex Lr vas \ 11111 I I I (? l
I s61 1 o _ _ VIII,, II. I ??A?? ?A I
3 \ A c 1 I 1 ?? ??? i ffffl 0G] ?/, OL8 c In
By \ ` I I I ,?c xm x?? RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER y? 03/04/05 ?® esl nm_
m0
\ \ s \ zenz6l? 1=~
152 Eart StrN6 >oc mgt: RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C. FBOZ a mm im
\ \ \ \ \ \ '°y'. ?,'p N.C. -7L Q-1 e9re: City, :sa3 I ROAD GRADING ]OHmMEM SEM.
1 I I +yr. ,,. a:?:,??YS osooe e or is
I l r?2 73 LF. Dx lY ????// / z l
?? Nv. at esiw Rv a ,
I fOPR 7? Lf.
J
/ Nv. _Og8 - - I
,h .
,SP? a ?6? C
"UTH - M -
?H /?
6111?WI W0.7A ' / \ I \ / /
1• , / P Hoob e sn , V /
c
ETLANDS?
f; 0+00? ', I I I
731.: Lf.AC M' TOP Of NOON SC' 00
N r
/V. N °q.20 \ I I /
8g KP
o / NY. OUT E11.70 1 I I I / / / //
N .331 10F CC)
57Rf111 / ?? , l I / /
WILL ??,° BE ?TU?
//
e[ sap[
TT
OF 871'
/-7 TOOFHOWMOO
Jf/ II(I NV. N / I I I
h.67
0.10a' NV. OUT M-1166
/ ? ? \ I I 1 I 1 / rl \ \
m 2. [f. OF 4/1 I "^agxTM ARr I
4-41 / N 6120 / I / / I 1 I
I I -W7?TMf NV/
1=7- /
CC)
1 II l? f ? l ?/ I
II?,?I11 II / )1 1?1
I I` , 1 11 ? ? 1 , ? I
1?, _ \ \ I I I ?o / / / I W
I - 1II ? i
ny zz9csxpTm By Ilm
I( ??o
4 ?0 04P
$ ,cur 1• -'W MUMN 8Tt im
1 . / I I I o N ti oUJHE >m xam RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER DAM 03/04/05 cme® m: m0
: e F
l l l` I 1 1\ 1 1 -?
4``` Loc&nm RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C.
152 Eut 7hi6 St,,m
i
EomtCity, N.C.28043 moc!T[mm ROAD GRADING Jw NUNS= SE3Z1!
?? 1 I , Hr. O!;,•• 829-241.4495 O6o06 7 OF is
1//?
C? ?.to ? ??
etiro
NV OUT B,l J'00 1
NY. QIT 4501.05
215DDO Pl . au \ ??O I \ \ \ 1 u
1 W
/ PROCESS WATER FILTER S40
TREATMENT LAGOON
RIM
INV. .4 83&25
- A\ aNmecrot 'OF FENCE,
PER PAGE 2 C)
00
21171 Lt.a?Y I l \ NOTE--
RCP 0 017CX I mritna TMCOCRMWTM7[
\ \
8nr Wfu cxa aR 01 1 / I I //// \\1 ?\ /// \\\\
I f ? ? ? 1 `I III 1 I ? V / // \\ / ` /_ \ \\ \\\ `
?:a?55
m
i ? \ \ \ \ // / / I ? ? 850 \ 1 \\ // I I I \ ?
??? ?? ?/ ?? \` ?? ? III\°
\ sg \\ / \? . I I I I
a60 \, ?, ?? \ I I Ilol
\ II I00 11 1
252.14 LP. OF 40' ?? \ 1 I I 1
ROP, 1.95% SLOPE
a'k'?P?''9 \ ? I I.n ? I ? 1 ? 1
\C , 9 Dz9cRnpDON m nun
WAM 1' ¦ 4w Ci?ix Eft im
I , DO
DATZ: 03/04/05 ma xA- RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER ?® mt nro
/ , r zg `• t ?fmxt RUTEMMRD COUNTY N.C. PRO= um ne
I52 East 511in CtreR
N1 y ° Form City, N.C.:8043 in Numim ?f`
\ / / / !Nr.Em?•• 828-2474495 : ROAD GRADING 06006 a or is
9K
971
23;
921
92,
921
911
91;
901
90,
90
m
e9;
ss.
ea
e7,
er
mi
ee,
eei
e5
as:
eu
e4
eu
e1
93
ez
inn pd+
w
t
PN STA - 1.50
PIA ELEY . 95071
ea
er
ea
er
en
eQ
86
ea,
ea
es
e5
es
u
es
eu
e4
04-
04
eu
e?
es
8T,
e9
eT
ea
92,
?vF?
ez
r
WM-
9.00 1.00 9.00
48" CULVERT PROFILE
LOOKING NORTH TO SOUTH
PAGE 4

ODO.
xm RUTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER yzn swxx 1•.IC
- xam 1.,100 MYN R1 im
CM® IT: om
82 wwm. RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C. MR: 05/04/05 PRO= 5m na

r 152 East Hain Street
r9c?y =
r^415. EorestCity, N.C. 28043
926:47-4795 : ROAD PROFH.ES in mums=
o5aos
9 or !5 Q
o xy I
fTT
Opp y peo ly? //// /? 'ice q
wom
ck:
ck:
14 i/ /
1?j It
o?? rii ?? ?`?`,- I I II
Roposm
,- I I I I I l I% ???,
/I vv??; V` I I I
t ? ? ? ?`? ? ? ?V ' ? 11 ??\V`???? •e? ? ?VI I I 1 ? (r'// ???? i! i ?. _ '_?' I % %v? ?\ ??? ? I I I
nROH es?N? 11111??????\? ?A
?'??11 IIII //?????`///?
eROOS°,o A ?? 111?? »? ???Y p
l/
Lufs
? ? ? ? I I ? I l I ? /// ? //, ?, / ? ? . ??? \II I I Ill/// ' ?•, ?, ? ? .. ? ??\? ? ? ) >'\?.? \
11 I /r % ,o.// , 1 1 111 ?? I 1 \? ?,?\ /l 1 \ \
1 <I I / i
?
,
I 1 v ?? 11,/I/ I? IIII IIIIIIIllj// //? i/ 11 f (I / / / I II?iI I / / ?/i ?/ _' / l l / Ill >? gII I I
/?-- ///mar l?lll ? ? / lIl
?--?///i//j//I Ill /i /
X111I
-/ //
o-?N 1 \ 111 ( 1 //// i/ i// / i
If A /
l 1 ?\ I //Ill/ r Ill I // / 1
//
------
???? _--
/ , A` ?? 111 I I I /I
I
o v/ I ?? 1 ;111?11111?I111'?%\???;?? I I
? ? ,I 111
I/ / l l' I lll;l?? i
??,1 I? ? I I I ?? I(I 111
?'?'?'</ I 1 I III II!
ZO 1 1 , 1 11
sq'9 ?RO?o ? ??I\'? \ Rt D?B?I1DlI

scar i? ioC ?r11 etl n7
1?4
?39F„d wm RUTHSRFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER
jcm mm 03/"/06 rnw® By: 610
1 RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C.
twAnms PRO= um ae

152 Gh Sfain Suer!
eerr=ICity, N.C.28043
828-2474495

Dot EROSION CONTROL LAYOUT

X2NuJ Et:
06006 ? i I L

3Ht:
10 01 !6 Q
? 9p5 m I ? ?/
WATER 3
r STORAGE 3 k
TANK
I / . EXIST. 12"
SEWER I
1 ?1 ? ? 13
I r // / ? I
OOU DIP STUB I
? 31
L!
12' GATE
VALVE
3
A 8" DIP STUB
OUT 8' DIP STUB
I _ OUT /
-?^StOT 3
IRAN T_ _.? PROPOSED 12" J
ROAD
06 20 1J DIP WATER I
LINE
rcil - '?
,if
I 8' DIP STUB (,j 8' DIP STUB
OUT 3 OUT
12" GATE Q-
VALVE /
' N 3
y
I REMOVE EXIST. CAP AND / ?lj
I TIE TO EXIST. 12"WATER
I LINE 3
8 F ?
t O
1 EXIST. 12" 3
?q WATER LIRE
/ 4
3 / \
\ / to
o?FF
3 Pye9\
L
` J 8" DIP STUB
v OUT
-
-
12" GATE
VALVE
8' DIP STUB
OUT
8" DIP STUB
OUT 8" DIP
OUT
-
TK
8' DIP STUB
OUT
acid` 1' ¦ a0' DION art Ica
1004 aum aUTHIOtFORD 74 CORPORATE CENTER nur 03/04/05 0sa® By: am
f.""``' Locum RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C. PRO= mm AH
151 E.0 at.. Str-t
Forest City, N.C.28043 a37CP1P m: WATER LAYOUT 10a Yuma= EffiR
829-117-4495 55005 11 OF 15 Q
TYPICAL 8' STUB OUT DETAIL
M.I.S,
a. 24-
6-
6'
1' RADIUS
d a
1" RADIUS
d d d a
4 a
d d
0
O
C
7-
"07M
L CMS MO O7TTM TD K COCTRI M N 10 rWT IDaMU
L t/t MCI MAW" AMT SMALL K RPM AT MfONALS NOT 10
CCtm 100 SRL ATM COS MO YD-1017 Cr KAIM; AND AT ANY
POR 09M M NEW CLM AND WTTEM AIM 01101 CO EX
SIMKTA.II
S 10 MT tDw MAIQIOO SHML K PMOMM Kilml PN]m CLp
AND YA77EY CAO
30' CURB AND (iLJ
KM
11 SID[ OR MATTER
IYwI
?. COPACRO SM
SLuOC\ w TLOM
Imo- Y w ?-?1 '
TEMPORARY BERM DETAIL
ARTS
ODQ/L 1o1Q
L ONLY O TUM GEAR CH GRAM ARRAS MDESV/ FOR CC rMCML
MM 0 OTORS! DEU EATC AMEAS MM 10 K OSUROM DOl[I
1010E AND 00ff CIOM MW DIT FROM THM MMAS 10 rRlDttE
MAIMIL CLOYA7M
L OEAM AM (MIS AREAS TO K MM 70 001M MM TEDETATM
IUOC MWM OR OIHM OEEC'ICMNS MA1OM111LAT 10MM AFTEET
M PANE= STMILM O M ML
l LAFLAEK ML NUM AAg MM[4 M T TMT TO EMEM O 1 D MK ZrPPME, META gn OR
0001 MDAID IRmDI?
4. KEEP MERSOa NO OWM EL2 AND OSQ IATO NMILYANM KA7IMES
MEE OF MONDIT AT ALL MQ
L MOMOL M i1EAM V ALL SOD MMQ M CONST MC" O MIM
TO OCEAN MIT. 113WAK WLVATOIL NO FA77TAA AC7ITATOL
D0.o1EML
L PEN&A ILY STANL E ALL GRAM AIEAS MMMMIMY ArTM MAL
GRAOW R MOOTED d EACH ARIA AMLY 1OM tM MEALO Of ALL
OIAOm AREAS WEN MOM 15 TO K BM "TED GR ODAYM FOR YS
90000 DAYS GR W CAL)LAN DAYL
YWIdIKE PLAN
L AS M." M ..dA.A ..Md p1.01..I
b. .IMatl b .top N e1r.Mb1
wrF ..M'P.d..l Id.kd Ia Y . s
M coal ..fm U.IL Ir.l M M
My.edde??tlIp.bLn.d.rY r M??e a
L Melfird M be ruin-d Iddd be
ed1.l
I.le. 1M l b.-r .1.4 0t ti . M
f- The e.dw-d 0- r be
I.Ma.d .
R.eeeem b .1.Ma. M b~.
IL t..1. IMrM-7.a_II Mq b d..11 ..
4 M -e.l ..1 M YtM? Ike .
III) Y eprd.dl.l1 M Sti a¢
.b0.. p1. to . Mprr.l de.-6
.eydAM .o.?.
PAT7711 I - 1
I _ I
6L-,- r-
IA %.9.. t'? IY
i ? T
lud
c: L roe,, -
:-- _- GRAYEL
I ENTRANCE/MT
m1sTRRX'ra4 SPEMCAIR"
1. Cl w V. rtraa rd -4 r. A A -gotot %
F..4 rd .qw AMctbI F..t.IM s prm.ly
?m1L
i ion IM pww to IM l W w pv4 ed
P o-w 'Fl m q. o .M ..oq U
I p. -oope to wry atw to br wtln.A
trop
•-Y' F7 S.RIANC MpEACE COURSE
r -0."
COMCR. "-6AI (10011 SM.)
l Are. )
aY
II x -I
I { t t I
?t ryr.1 s
AF.'
•? OU17dT
PROTECTION
I. E.- ..EMvb M q. mt. rb'prom b A pr.
M.. C.oc1 -, M 1..r.e M " ubg,.b to
b. -1, a tM .I...ay -ftb.b.. m
too - M q. wer.b a Ind.bb...4 rq
dA M IMe by Mv'q'" o-omL
1 Rtw dom. M.. -4 -ot root doWg, o,, A-
to wd be "t--td A.n pwd" or t.r.y
M w.slby )1Fto M..Aa .rota ot
1 ram mq M NA are r 1.Dp1
It MI.N be bw4 wm.Ar, boy wog'-r.Nmt
rd ti 7...L
A Cwnbuct tloo wr1 a m Mob CHAR a .oor-
MAWrA Mdl the too M tM Form A tM
doom n wd IM a. qe r-" - or Moby
b.. M
1 E- pwt t. won M prowl/ -v d aD1 Coo
-." Aron a5 pnN.Hr boot p-y-t
Ib "M Moor. M nooe.A Mr. R M W .ppw
wd a qNt
man
bn.detM, .Roo o+.tnrpll.h tobmto A d.b.b.e
AIt -gotAM
A [a..
T
?M ,,, 69S 7fiTCe
CON57RtX1101 gCDFrA1R11S
CO/SIRUCDOR MATEMAL
L U. =o 111' Id.M o,pwb1. d+ A
.AIR M ertlA.A by M oowwhxbr r wrdlw a
b h a 3o eM IArwa so Z (.p
.'lo') A 71); MrgAI.A ooM . Mrry Aa rel.
a D.1 gd/.. R sriMlk wlp / " pm arp-
-m a, bA bK- v A town- to Pooh. mk S
p. ..pclM ""' Poe at 0-170 do% F.
E- p.l pr4 n I.A k/R td aq . 1nMCn
l.pq, of 1 toot.
mm rnM
S. aRoMe1 edrR I. 1w9o A. P.w ath
CMS1Al1CR111
11. E. hl la to-boo .A -.-d IC d.-
r C.I.bvcl - Awn wltk- 1a M 1. Mrgq
of boor to .ooM ) Mto. .boo fMt. - r--.x
ooo.M, fa1.1 1. Rlw dotb all A . .part
pat aq Mb M " M PaL
1 L.prt .Irdr1 .booSq Abdo aq .b.'F'ool
blr./ oou.M, M mom. Mb a p..M .Ap
I.a, bl, rt. Mom at Mad I' I.np EAwW .10
R- to wEtrn of ord.
29
"4vtMS _.
ENTRANCE ROAD RICHT OF WAY - 80'
31' ASPHALT WOTH
1747/FT 174'/FT
ROAD CROSS SECTI
ON
MM
nwcmq
I a??
SNVACE
PAUGIfENINC
caRSrRllclla SRCAIC.A?IG.15
ru suers
1. Fla. M Ma. b Rft W 1. ..rr1 It Mdw .d
FM. - .b pR M pn.r1/ -rooted
1 Ear. qA M ba of b. Moe w is aM.
mwrppctN M A to M blcRoo doop
S. 0- Ao" r, .pp'orbl. b..-t b1.1 =-
too, .b, o.AW a W MCpL Do RA rM. =-
4.. tM 0 .vl... bop nr tl.oo 15 bd....l.rt.
4. Do not bleb or v W RRM Mope loft
015 9.0PC3 AND LMptAOCU AREAS THAT HAVE 1071
QUI® AND GRUBOM
15,1. ?y MrabMi. or w .1 .I Wtblpftd" d
..Or. M q. tMM Woo of ., .001 iMOpe
1'w..t m the pat-
2.
Yd. brrl.e b1.M klRA-b dote
loptl. < 10 bd..) rd nt2end M. pla. 1 Md1 bop.
1 [.LwM...Mnr Y rre_
b..d.IM, oo. rd rrAd1 -gh woo to dtdn
o1M.n -0 qom otbr rd Matti PrMM<a1 ch.dt
.....d.d W.- b rM W ..Mr. rT qw.
a rW .r4
"dM.oA
nWr -- p
POMMMEXT Sf
GRADS LINED CP ELS IIMO
T.11 le.... ... 100 lbl..
Rentudr aue....
R
. ,0 IDl..
D len.
r
1- 4000 Ibis
D I-D I.r111te.r 1200 Iblw
.tn. .00D Ibh.
ALL 0M(A SURFACES
1.11 l... u. ED lb/.c
11¢1 le.P..ei. 30 Ib(.c
R.E. L.P.ov. 10 la.c
Rp. .D mnp
1.1. .000 1.1.
010n01.rl111e.r
an. 1000 Ib1e
I0M Ibpc
1 ol
sL.uER lea 11 - ? uO
G.r....111.1 .0 l.l.c
III 'Au, IS . Mc 11)
RY. 'pr_; l IE_
.'INTIRIEARLY SIRING (r.b I - .., IS)
Ro. ,^r.lnl I'D I'll,
N n l.p.oer. ID It .e
L1.. 2000 lb-
10.10-10 ism It'..
U. 4000 IDI.,
1 s Blvv? RUTTHERFORD 74 CORPORATE BrAM MM MIM Brl icr
IDOMo END CBNTBR nAiC 03/4/05
cze® BTt IM
u0am. FOREST CITY. N.C. PEDIDMT Km in
152 East Main St-t
Forest City, N.C. 28043
8:8
2474495
DmanT tl STREET/EROSION CONTROL JOB MUIM: SEMM
-
DETAILS ?00e is or ?B

PAVEVENT SECTION
MM