SOUTHERN EGG CO LINCOLN CO_MISC_20171231

'3 N
Control Number
County Number
593
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCE INVENTORY
"MoSource Name
5
OWNERSHIP
0
rivate
Source
Address
Sr2 13
2 Municipal
SV2 1380
Sl GI_ Sipe of 2e If
3 County
4 State
city
County
Region
✓e t
i,e a A,
5 Federal
6 Military
Owner/ perator
Quad Name
Multiple SourcSite
oun y ource Vs
YES NO
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
LOCATION
OPERATION TYPE
TYPE OF WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITY
OTHER SOURCE
0 Facility
I Municipal
1 Gasoline/diesel
1 Lagoon, etc.
1
Agricultural Activity
2 Highway
2 Industrial
2 Other oil
2 Landfill-contro.
2
Salt water intrusion
3 Railroad
3 Agricultural'
3 Solvents
3 Landfill-uncont.
3
Chemical stock pile
4 Waterway
4 Oil and gas
4 Corrosives
4 Land application
4
River infiltration
5 Pipeline
5 Mining
5 Other chemical
5 Abandoned site
5
Mine drainage
6 Dumpsite
Other Source
6 Sewage/septage
6 Sewer system
6
Intentional dump
7 Other
7 Sludge
7 Septic tank
7
Spill
Leachate
8 Infection well
8
Leak --above ground
9 Other solids
0 Disposal well
9
Leak --underground
1 In use
10 Gas
WASTE:
STATUS OF SOURCE: � Inactive?
11 Pest/herbicides
/�
ChicKeso & rc4xses
'3 Other
12 Fertilizers
POLLUTION STATUS AND CROSS-REFERENCES
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
FACILITY PERMITTED: Yes No
1 Confirmed (D Rank
1 NPDES 6 Mining
L..`/ Potential 2 Tabulate
No: No:
2 DEM Nondischarge 7 Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
MONITORING WELLS
No: No:
1 No monitoring
2 State has data
3 Well Construction 8 Solid Waste
(Landfill)
3 Data at facility
No: No:
Status unknown
4 Capacity Use 9 Oil Terminal
Registration
DATABASE CROSS-REFERENCE
No: No:
1 ERRIS (CERCLA) list
5 UIC 0 Air Quality
ID:
No: No:
2 Surface Impoundment (SIA)
Comments
ID:
V'deer, S" co'n elp- h'-4, #so 44.
501;d too-sfe /�ul�resC;61� Cyel,'�� felt
3 GW Pollution Source Inv.
Date:
'4 Other DEM investigation
Date:
Compiler: Date:

sEP
W P�E� �1V1S
tO N
GROUND WATER DIVISION
OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
you RA`ook. - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
RECORD OF GROUND WATER POLLUTION SOURCE
LIP 028 437
N68 v S93
35.30 30
81 01 20
RECORD BY: Michael S. Marsh DATE 'Y1176 W.D. PERMIT NO.
TOWN: Denver COUNTY: Lincoln
LOCATION (SKETCH ON BACK): I.0 mi N of 1380 & 1351 on'west side of SR' 138Q_
OWNERS) OF FACILITY OR INSTALLATION:_ Southern Egg Company _
TYPE SOURCE: (LAND FILL, LAGOON, ETC) Solid Waste Putrescible Cycling Cell
CHARACTER AND QUANTITY OF POLLUTANTS: Chicken ,Carcasses
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY (SKETCH ON BACK) : 8' Dee LS to 5' concrete lined:
_ 480 cu. ft. cap. (8 chickens/cu.-ft.-max.)
HYDROGEOLOG I C CONDITIONS AT SITE: sandy clay saprolite, granitic bedrock
POLLUTION CONFIRMED BY ANALYSIS? No DATE ANALYST:
MONITORING FACILITIES INSTALLED: No
SAMPLING SCHEDULE: None
NEAREST STREAM: Branch Forney Creek DISTANCE 2000 ft,
NEAREST WATER SUPPLY WELL: Site (2 wells) DISTANCE
ANALYSES AND OTHER DATA AVAILABLE:
REMARKS:
FORM GW -46

f' . i �� '� % .,..
�Zti.�t.��1.
c
� G y c I, n� G �•'r

G R 0 U N D 1.1 A T E R P O L L U T I O N S 0 U R C E E V A L U A T I 0 N
R A N K I N G C R I T E R I A
THREAT TO GROUNDWATER
Probability of Groundwater Violations
30 Violations documented or highly probable
.2 Default
,i Violations unlikely
Extent of Groundwater Contamination
3 flappable, migrating plume
ODefault
1 Insignificant contamination expected
Seriousness of Groundwater Threat
3 One of most serious in OEM region
0
Default
I Not considered a serious problem
r& FEASIBILITY FOR TAKING ACTION
Feasibility for Remedial Action
0 Remedial action both feasible and desirable
2 Default
1 No remedial action recommended
Desirability of Remedial Action
3 One of top regional office priorities
0 Default
1 Not a priority incident
=i THREAT TO PEOPLE OR ECONOMY
How Hazardous to Health/Economy
3 People or business advised of contamination
20 Default
1 No expected impacts on people or business
Number of People at Risk
3 4 or more family units, or $10,000 loss
0 Default
I No people or other interests at risk
Seriousness of People Threat
3 Strong DEM concern over threat to people
0 Default
1 No threat to people or economy
_—) FEASIBILITY OF RECLASSIFYING GROUNDWATER
Need to Reclassifv Croundwater
3 Groundwater should be reiassified RS or GC
ODefault
I No reciass. nor remedial action recommended
Desirability of reclassification
3 One of top reclassification priorities
02 Default
1 Not a priority incident
THREAT OF POLLUTANTS
How Toxic are Pollutants (use Sax)
3 High value
20 Mod value'
1 Low or None value
Quantity of Pollutants in Ground
3 Reportable quantity of hazardous material
(CERCLA def.) or quantity of real concern
02 Default
I Not of concern to regional office
Seriousness of Pollutant Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
0 Default
I Not a serious threat
RANK SCORE:
Source Name:
llui1
Control Number: 513
County:037
Ranker-
Date
anker:Date : `

JSP MAR 3 01968
Control Nu her
S-'�f
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCE INVENTORY
County Number
Q 3(c
Source Name
OWNERSHIP
S4
0 Private
2 Municipal
'Source Address
� � S. C 3 —
r s t2 135
3
• 1rY1 �
T
3 County
4 State
CityJ
ff
County
Region
L I kico YlT'0�n
Y� !}
i�
5 Federal
6 Military
Owner/ perator
} Quaa game
u p e Sources^ Site--JCounty
Source s
YES NO
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
LOCATION
OPERATION TYPE
TYPE OF WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITY
OTHER SOURCE
Q1 Facility
1 Municipal
1 Gasoline/diesel
1 Lagoon, etc.
1
Agricultural Activity
2 Highway
2 Industrial
2 Other oil
2 Landfill-contro.
2
Salt water intrusion
3 Railroad
3 Agricultural
3 Solvents
3 Landfill-uncont.
3
Chemical stock pile
4 Waterway
4 Oil and gas
4 Corrosives
4 Land application
4
River infiltration
5 Pipeline
5 Mining
5 Other chemical
5 Abandoned site
5
Mine drainage
6 Dumpsite
Other Source
6 Sewage/septage
6 Sewer system
6
Intentional dump
7 Other
iiiJJJ
7 Sludge
7 Septic tank
7
Spill
8 Leachate
8 Injection well
8
Leak --above ground
0 Other solids
a9 Disposal well
9
Leak --underground
1 In use
STATUS OF SOURCE: 2O Inactive?
10 Gas
11 Pest/herbicides
WASTE:
CA,c ke Pi 04 M4 SSe 5
3 Other
12 Fertilizers
POLLUTION STATUS AND CROSS-REFERENCES
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
FACILITY PERMITTED: Yes No
1 ConfirmedID Rank
1 NPDES
6 Mining
0 Potential 2 Tabulate
No:
2 DEM Nondischarge
No:
7 Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
MONITORING WELLS
No:
No:
1 No monitoring
2 State has data
3 Well Construction
8 Solid Waste
(Landfill)
3 Data at facility
No:
No:
OStatus unknown
4 Capacity Use
9 Oil Terminal
Registration
DATABASE CROSS-REFERENCE
No:
No:
1 ERRIS (CERCLA) list
5 UIC
0 Air Quality
ID:
No:
No:
2 Surface Impoundment (SIA)
Comments doer, 6 _o ereie It MAI vel.„,e 481) t4. ;k.
ID:
_J ,
Shc�d Wasf e. Rktresc161c Cyd* --t Cell
3 GW Pollution Source Inv.
Date:
4 Other DEM investigation
Date:
Compiler:
Date:

SEP 29
GROUND WATER DIVISION
GROUND WADER DIVISION OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
RALEIGH, N. Dd DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
RECORD OF GROUND WATER POLLUTION SOURCE
LIP 029 O
068 m
35 27 00
81 02 10
RECORD BY: Michael S. Marsh DATE17F, W.D. PERMIT NO.
TOWN: Lincolnton COUNTY: Lincoln
LOCATION (SKETCH ON BACK) : .35 mi. S of NC 73 - 100' w of SR 1383
OWNER(S) OF FACILITY OR INSTALLATION:_ Southern Egg Company
TYPE SOURCE: (LAND FILL, LAGOON, ETC) Solid Waste Putrescible Cycliinng Cell � ^
CHARACTER AND QUANTITY OF POLLUTANTS: Chicken carcasses
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY (SKETCH ON BACK: 8' deep 5' concrete lined; total volume
480 cu. ft.
HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS AT SITE: sandy clay saprolite, granitic bedrock.
POLLUTION CONFIRMED BY ANALYSIS? No DATE ANALYST:
MONITORING FACILITIES INSTALLED: No
SAMPLING SCHEDULE: None
NEAREST STREAM: Anderson Creek DISTANCE 800'
NEAREST WATER SUPPLY WELL: Site (22wells) DISTANCE 425'
ANALYSES AND OTHER DATA AVAILABLE:
REMARKS:
FORM GW -46

q
Dty�

G R O U N D 14 A T E R P O L L U T I O N S O U R C E E V A L U A T I O N
RANKING CP, ITE P, IA
THREAT TO GROUNDWATER
Probability of Groundwater Violations
0 Violations documented or highly probable
2 Default
I Violations unlikely .
Extent of Groundwater Contamination
3 Mappable, migrating plume
20 Default
1 Insignificant contamination expected
Seriousness of Groundwater Threat
�
3 One of most serious in OEM region
[ 2 } Default
1 Not considered a serious problem
O FEASIBILITY FOR TAKING ACTION
Feasibility for Remedial Action
3Q Remedial action both feasible and desirable
2 Default
1 No remedial action recommended
Desirability of Remedial Action
3 One of top regional office priorities
ODefault
1 Not a priority incident
Z THREAT TO PEOPLE OR ECONOMY
How Hazardous to Health/Economy
3 People or business advised of contamination
ODefault
I No expected impacts on people or business
Number of People at Risk
3 4 or more family units, or $10,000 loss
{ c ] Default
1 No people or other interests at risk
Seriousness of People Threat
3 Strong DEM concern over threat to people
/
12 } Default
I No threat to people or economy
d] FEASIBILITY OF RECLASSIFYING GROUNDWATER
Need to Reclassify Croundwater
3 Groundwater should be relassified RS or GC
ODefault
1 No reclass. nor remedial action recommended
Desirability of Reclassification
3 One of top reclassification priorities
ODefault
1 Not a priority incident
_r'THREAT OF POLLUTANTS
How Toxic are Pollutants (use Sax)
3 High value
OMod value
1 Low or None value
Quantity of Pollutants in Ground
3 Reportable quantity of hazardous material
(CERCLA def.) or quantity of real concern
Oefault
1 Not of concern to regional office
Seriousness of Pollutant Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
0 Default
I Not a serious threat
RANK SCORE:
Source Name: J " 46L,
Control Number:
County:
Ranker:
Date:

Control Number
County Number
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCE INVENTORY
_36
Source Name
OWNERSHIP
Private
2 Municipal
ource Address
• S 2 93 6-1 S 1 Q 4 C 7
3 County
4 State
City / County Region
4
$1 o/in 1
t hL'0�1?
5 Federal
6 Military
Owner/ perator
Quad Name
-Rultiple Sourcep.4 sit
County Soufte #Is
YES NO
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
LOCATION
OPERATION TYPE
TYPE OF WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITY
OTHER SOURCE
© Facility
1 Municipal
1 Gasoline/diesel
1 Lagoon, etc.
1
Agricultural Activity
2 Highway
2 Industrial
2 Other oil
2 Landfill-contro.
2
Salt water intrusion
3 Railroad
3 Agricultural
3 Solvents
3 Landfill-uncont.
3
Chemical stock pile
4 Waterway
4 Oil and gas
4 Corrosives
4 Land application
4
River infiltration
5 Pipeline
5 Mining
5 Other chemical
5 Abandoned site
5
Mine drainage
6 Dumpsite
6 Other Source
6 Sewage/septage
6 ,Sewer system
6
Intentional dump
7 Other
7 Sludge
7 Septic tank
7
Spill
8 Leachate
8 Injection well
8
Leak --above ground
O9 Other solids
0 Disposal well
9
Leak --underground
1 In use
10 Gas
WASTE:
C 'h,'cher) 0'Rr irSa•S
STATUS OF SOURCE: Q Inactive!
11 Pest/herbicides
3 Other
12 Fertilizers
POLLUTION STATUS AND CROSS-REFERENCES
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
FACILITY PERMITTED: Yes No
1 Confirmed 0 Rank
1 NPDES 6 Mining
2OPotential 2 Tabulate
No: No:
2 DEM Nondischarge 7 Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
MONITORING WELLS
No: No:
1 No monitoring
2 State has data
3 Well Construction 8 Solid Waste
(Landfill)
3 Data at facility
No: No:
® Status unknown
4 Capacity Use 9 Oil Terminal
Registration
DATABASE CROSS-REFERENCE
No: No:
1 ERRIS (CERCLA) list
5 UIC D Air Quality
ID:
No: No:
2 Surface Impoundment (SIA)
Comments e e '
h',10 -,O+ P, 5 Co.�erc>ie ,10-, 500 c A 1ff ['.lxcr_t r
ID:
5e10d Wa31c, Cyeji.j Call
3 GW Pollution Source Inv.
Date:
4 Other DEM investigation
Date:
Compiler: Date:

r
CO
GROUND WATER DIVISION
OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
G�- DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
RECORD OF GROUND WATER POLLUTION SOURCE
LIP 027
068 n
35 27 20
81 03 10
RECORD BY: Michael S. Marsh DATE 16/76 W.D. PERMIT NO.
TOWN: Lincolnton' COUNTY: Lfr�rnln
LOCATION (SKETCH ON BACK): 1.1 mi. W. of SR 13{3_ -on S side of NC 73
OWNERS) OF FACILITY OR INSTALLATION: Southern E££ CMRaay„ _
TYPE SOURCE: (LAND FILL, LAGOON, ETC) Solid Waste Putrescible Cycling -Cell ----
CHARACTER AND QUANTITY OF POLLUTANTS: Chicken Carcasses
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY (SKETCH ON BACK) : 8' deep 5' concrete lined:_5QQ curt-.
capacity (at 8 chickens/cu. ft. max.)
HYDROGEOLOG I C CONDITIONS AT SITE: sandy clgy saRj 10 ite, granitic bedrock
POLLUTION CONFIRMED BY ANALYSIS? No DATE ANALYST:
MONITORING FACILITIES INS-TALLED: No
SAMPLING SCHEDULE: None
NEAREST STREAM : Branch of Anderson Creek DISTANCE 1000'
NEAREST WATER SUPPLY WELL: Site (2„wells) DISTANCE 400' _.
ANALYSES AND OTHER DATA AVAILABLE:
REMARKS:
FORM GW -46

i
1
� ell
I�
• � 7i7J ny o i1
log

GR0UND11ATER POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION
R A N K I N E C R I T E P. I A
THREAT TO GROUNDWATER
Probability of Groundwater Violations
30 violations documented or highly probable
2 Default
I Violations unlikely .
Extent of Groundwater Contamination
3 Mappable, migrating plume
Default
1 Insignificant contamination expected
Seriousness of Groundwater Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
Q2 Default
1 Not considered_a serious problem
a FEASIBILITY FOR TAKING ACTION
Feasibility for Remedial. Action
0 Remedial action both feasible and desirable
2 Default
1 No remedial action recommended
Desirability of Remedial Action
3 One of top regional office priorities
(D Default
1 Not a priority incident
THREAT TO PEOPLE OR ECONOMY
How Hazardous to Health/Economy
3 People or business advised of contamination
.0 Default
I No expected impacts on people or business
Number of People at Risk
3 4 or more family units, or $10,000 loss
0 Default
1 No people or other interests at risk
Seriousness of People Threat
3 Strong DEM concern over threat to people
0 Default
1 No threat to people or economy
FEASIBILITY OF RECLASSIFYING GROUNDWATER
Need to Reclassifv Groundwater
3 Groundwater should be relassified RS or GC
2 Default
1 No reclass. nor remedial action recommended
Desirability of Reclassification
/3 One of top reclassification priorities
(D } Defau1t
1 Not a priority incident
THREAT OF POLLUTANTS
How Toxic are Pollutants (use Sax)
3 High value
Mod value
1 Low or None value
Quantity of Pollutants in Ground
3 Reportable quantity of hazardous material
(CERCLA def.) or quantity of real concern
Default
1 Not of concern to regional office
Seriousness of Pollutant Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
0 Default
1 Not a serious threat
RANK SCORE:
Source Name:
Control Number. �� Q_
County- .35
Ranker:
Date: `

I
MAR
Control Number
County Number
4t I
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCE INVENTORY
D 3 4
Source Name
OWNERSHIP
SP
�rivate
2 Municipal
Source Address
S 1?- 136 Q
3 County
4 State
City
4,
County Region
A
i r) C' a/.,
C 0A,
5 Federal
6 Military
Owner/Operator
7V Quad Name
Multiple Source&A4.,Site
County Source s
YES ND
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
LOCATION
OPERATION TYPE
TYPE OF WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITY
OTHER SOURCE
ff)Facility
1 Municipal
1 Gasoline/diesel
1 Lagoon, etc.
l
Agricultural Activity
2 Highway
2 Industrial
2 Other oil
2 Landfill-contro.
2
Salt water intrusion
3 Railroad
3 Agricultural
3 Solvents
3 Landfill-uncont.
3
Chemical stock pile
4 Waterway
4 Oil and gas
4 Corrosives
4 Land application
4
River infiltration
5 Pipeline
5 Mining
5 Other chemical
5 Abandoned site
5
Mine drainage
6 Dumpsite
6 Other Source
6 Sewage/septage
6 Sewer system
6
Intentional dump
7 Other
7 Sludge
7 Septic tank
7
Spill
Leachate
8 Injection well
8
Leak --above ground
Other solids
Disposal well
9
Leak --underground
1 In use�
i0 Gas
WASTE:C��er, (�rC�fS¢5
STATUS OF SOURCE: Inactive.
11 Pest/herbicides
3 Other
12 Fertilizers
POLLUTION STATUS AND
CROSS-REFERENCES
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
FACILITY PERMITTED:
Yes No
1 Confirmed 0 Rank
1 NPOES
6 Mining
0 Potential 2 Tabulate
No:
2 DEM Nondischarge
No:
7 Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
MONITORING WELLS
No:
No:
1 No monitoring
2 State has data
3 Well Construction
8 Solid Waste
(Landfill)
3 Data at facility
No:
No:
Status unknown
4 Capacity Use
9 Oil Terminal
Registration
DATABASE CROSS-REFERENCE
No'
No:
1 ERRIS (CERCLA) list
5 UIC
0 Air Quality
ID.
No:
No:
2 Surface Impoundment ,(SIA)
ID:
Commentsg 1 d f ' p.r, G•S -
�Q� C2Y1,ln en¢C�
S` (,Z� +(,li �1`
M A.7C • �.
3 GW Pollution Source Inv.sol
id Waste
Puf!'Qsc,j L. le Cyel1-1 Ce.tl
Date:
4 Other DEM investigation
Date:
Compiler:
Date:

SEp 1S
GROUND WATER DIVISION
�
ND w40E "IVI OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES
G4 R�L��C,N� N' v -
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
RECORD OF GROUND WATER POLLUTION SOURCE
LIP 026 �3
068 f
35 28 30
81 04 05
RECORD BY: Michael S. Marsh DATE 2,P176 W.D. PERMIT NO.
TOWN: Lincolnton COUNTY: Lincoln
LOCATION (SKETCH ON BACK): SR 1360
OWNER(S) OF FACILITY OR INSTALLATION: Southern Egg Com�an
TYPE SOURCE: (LAND FILL, LAGOON, ETC) Solid Waste Putrescible Cycling Gell
CHARACTER AND QUANTITY OF POLLUTANTS: Chicken Carcasses
DESCR I PTION OF FACI LI TY (SKETCH ON BACK) :- 8' deep— Cement lined—from LS + o
(620 cu. ft. max. cap. at eight (8) chickens per cu. ft.)
HYDROGEOLOG I C CONDITIONS AT SITE: sandy clay "prolite. granitic bedrock
POLLUTION CONFIRMED BY ANALYSIS? No DATE ANALYST:
MONITORING FACILITIES INSTALLED: No
SAMPLING SCHEDULE: None
NEAREST STREAM: Anderson Creek DISTANCE 1000'
NEAREST WATER SUPPLY WELL: Site 2 wells DISTANCE 400'+
ANALYSES AND OTHER DATA AVAILABLE:
REMARKS: No data on wells.
FORM GW -46

w ��
"�
crcG'
�,��
:v

GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCE
R A N K I N G C P, I T E P I A
THREAT TO GROUNDWATER
Probability of Groundwater Violations
0 Violations documented or highly probable
2 Default
1 Violations unlikely
Extent of Groundwater Contamination
3 Mappable, migrating plume
Default
1 Insignificant contamination expected
Seriousness of Groundwater Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
ODefault
1 Not considered a serious problem
n FEASIBILITY FOR TAKING ACTION
Feasibility for Remedial Action
13 j Remedial action both feasible and desirable
2 Default
I No remedial action recommended
Desirability of Remedial Action
3 One of top regional office priorities
0 Default
1 Not a priority incident
THREAT TO PEOPLE OR ECONOMY
How Hazardous to Health/Economy
3 People or business advised of contamination
(2) Default
1 No expected impacts on people or business
Number of -People at Risk
3 4 or more family units, or $10,000 loss
0 Defaul t
1 No people or other interests at risk
Seriousness of People Threat
3 Strong OEM concern over threat to people
Default
1 No threat to people or economy
FEASIBILITY OF RECLASSIFYING GROUNDWATER
Need to Reclassifv Groundwater
3 Groundwater should be relassified RS or GC
0 Default
I No reclass, nor remedial action recommended
Desirability of Reclassification
3 One of top reclassification priorities
Default
1 Not a priority incident
E V A L U A T I O N
—.� THREAT OF POLLUTANTS
How Toxic are Pollutants (use Sax)
3 High value
0 Mod value
1 Low or None value
Quantity of Pollutants in Ground
3 Reportable quantity of hazardous material
(CERCLA def.) or quantity of real concern
2� Default
1 Not of concern to regional office
Seriousness of Pollutant Threat
3 One of most serious in OEM region
Default
1 Not a serious threat
RANK SCORE:
Source Name: '&� #
Control 1, , �� � —
County: (iJ . /1�, A g
Ranker:
Date: