490017_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Animal Waste Management System Operator Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8F .0201
Facility/Farm Name: I C, �U, � I �'v.�� s
Permit #: Vuf� �00 (-7 Facility 1D#: 1-7 county: County: T��dp � +
Operator In Charge (OIC)
Name: - 7T; rl _ `A C .ice
First Middle Last Jr, Sr, etc.
Celt Type / Number._%} W-1 00 i mm_ Work Phone: (gO y)
Signature: � p� C �� J .... Date: J 2 a ~ ! 7
" I certify that I agree to my designation as the Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules and requlations
pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in 15A NCAC 08F ,0203 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary Actions by the Water
Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Back-up Operator In Charge (Back-up OIC) (Optional)
Name
Middle Last Jr, Sr, etc.
Cert Type / Number: W - y 0 Work Phone:( :?o �/ } �`1 �- 2 62 7
Date:- 1..�..._17
"I certify that f agree to my designation as Back-up Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules and
regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in 15A NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary Actions by the
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Owner/Permittee Name: —J-."J
Phone #: ( ?0y) ,��; -2- a 0 3 7 _ Fax#:
Sigt7atUrt?:.S nerAga—
orauthorized agent)o✓.�"Yr-�•.� _... Da to:—. ' 2 %

I
Bealle, James
From:
Beaile, James
Sent:
Monday, November 27, 2017 3:33 PM
To:
Buffington, Beth
Cc:
Lawson, Christine
Subject:
Williams Operator Designation
Attachments:
WilliamsOperatorDesignation.pdf
fyi...
C.
James B. Bealle III
Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
704 235 2162 office
704 743 6872 mobile
L m es. bealleO-ncdenr.gov
www.ncwater.org
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Nothing Compares
vW
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Environmental
Quality
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
RECEIVEDINCUEN HiDVl I
November 30, 2017 NOV 3 0 2017
Jean Redmond
TC Williams Farm WQROS
110 Taylor Springs Road POORMILLE RE(' 10!,JAL OFFICE
Union Grove, NC 28689
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490017
TC Williams Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Jean Redmond:
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received November 27, 2017, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jean Redmond, authorizing the operation
of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for TC Williams Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater than the
following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: 85 Dry Cow: 35 Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: 80 Beef Stocker Calf- Other:
Milk Cow: 200 Beef Feeder:
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC490017 dated October 1, 2014. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified
in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals
authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC _and _the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
State of North Carolina I Snvironrnental Quality I Division of Water Resw ees
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail service Center j Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a I00-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
ha://www.weather.gQy/gsp/.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 704-663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Linda Culpepper
Interim Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWC490017)

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: S Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �]O L Arrival Time: 3: Departure Time: O County: Region:
Farm Name:y . C • C r� 1 ``�� �i e- t Owner Email:
Owner Name: t `\ �"�' " phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: j Integrator: (( Q
Certified Operator: t ' " �� Certification Number: �l 1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -Layer
Other
Poults
Design Current
Longitude:
Cow
Calf
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Design Current
Capacity Pop._
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No z
A NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ NE
❑NA ONE
[DNA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: -
Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If _ees, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
�'c Structur 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
lentifie
4
dllway
Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate Ms e integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environmental th eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes i �oO NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, �orcom�pliance�temafi�vest need ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
I I . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes\7 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind rift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � Q o
13. Soil Type(s): W tiIQ lr[ L~r_
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the
& Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
�D.,,,ecord keeping need im ent? If yes, check the priate box below. ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Application Weekly F board ante Analysis Soil Analysis ❑ Wast fern ETWeaffier Code
all Locking QRropYield 0 Minute Inspections eE3 onthly and V Rainfall Inspections s geur ey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ! SVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ Noii�E] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

1Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: Z- —Z' —l�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes o�NA�E] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? LE]Yeq..�c S, ] NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose o dead with 24 hours and/or document N ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'Ejj�Z ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34" Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ ❑❑ YNAYes Ne-t
❑ NA
Comments (refer to question # ): Ekpla h any YES' answers and/dr '4ny additional recommendations or any other cofnments.
Use drawings. of facility to better ex .lain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
C, 70E�4k
E,-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
❑NE
❑NE
❑NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
January 11, 2016
Thomas C. Williams
T.C. Williams Farm, Inc.
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28689
T MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
T.C. Williams Farm, Inc,/Facility 49-17
General Permit AWC490017
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Dfiverar
On December 10, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected T.C. Williams Farm, Inc. and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Charlie L. Williams, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerel?sB,
alle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated December 10, 2015
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office, 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 29115
704 663 1699

tom:
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Date of Visit: 12/10/2015 Entry Time: 03:00 pm Exit Time: 4:3
Farm Name: T.C. Williams Farm, Inc.
Owner: Thomas C Williams
Mailing Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop
Permit. AWC490017
❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Iredell Region:
Mooresville
pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
704-592-2338
Union Grove NC 286899205
Physical Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop Union Grove NC 286899205
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36' 01' Longitude: B1° 00' 00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Unney Mill. Turn left on Burke Rd.
Farm is on the left about 200 vards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Dischrge $ Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Charlie L Williams Operator Certification Number: 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s}: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector. James Heal Phon 7 -fi63-1699 Fad
Inspector Signature: Date. 4
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
10/14/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.41 Lbs/1000 Gallons
06/23/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.88 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/19/13 > Soil Analysis
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility !Number: 490017 '
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
pi Cattle - Dairy Calf
85
30
!� Cattle- Dairy Heifer
80
80
i Cattle - DryCow
35
30
Cattle - Milk Caw
200
110
Total Design Capacity: 4UU
Total SSLW: 438,750
Waste Structures
Designated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 24.00 48.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
E ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
MCI
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage_& Treatment
Yos No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
� ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
Cl
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
WasJ2 Application
Yen No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/D/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste lica 'on
Yu
No No Ng
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Soybean,
Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Y$!
NO "a No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily avaiiable?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need Improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on Irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fall to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Peirnit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■❑❑
❑❑■❑
Yes
❑
No_Ne_No
ME]
❑
❑
ME]
❑
❑
ME]
❑
❑■❑❑
11
El
❑
❑
❑
❑
ME]
❑
❑■❑❑
page: 5

t
7
Water Resources
ENVMONMENTAL RUALITY
August 2, 2016
Thomas C. Williams
T.C. Williams Farm, Inc.
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28689
�5 t�
R'J5
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretaty
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
T.C. Williams Farm, Inc./Facility 49-17
General Permit AWC490017
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Williams:
L)lrector
On June 22, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected T.C. Williams Farm, Inc. and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Charlie L. Williams, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
eealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 22, 2016
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I W9torRasources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 1 Mooresville, north Carolina 2g115
704 663 1699

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWC490017
Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Iredell Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit: 06/22/2016 Entry Time: 04:30 pm Exit Time: 5:30
pm Incident #
Farm Name: T.C. Williams Farm, Inc.
Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas C Williams
Phone:
704-592-2338
Mailing Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 286899205
Physical Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 286899205
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude:
360 01' Longitude:
81° 00' 00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on Burke
Rd.
Farm is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other lesues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams Operator Certification Number: 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Sits Representative(s): Name Tide Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ja a Phone:;Q„4-66 -
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(&):
Inspection Summary:
03/11116 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.39 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/14115 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.41 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/19/13 > Soil Analysis
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/22/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
85
40
1i Cattle - Dairy Heifer
80
0
Cattle - Dry Cow
35
25
Cattle - Milk Cow
200
110
Total Design Capacity: 400
Total SSLW- 438,750
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 24.00 48.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility !Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/22/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
- Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
ON
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ s
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storane & Treatment
Yes_ No No Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.eJ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
N ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[] M ❑ 0
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
El
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/o/10 Ibs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

if
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/22/16 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Waste Application
Yea _
No _Na Na
Crop Type 1
com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
soybean,
wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 01111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the. facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
110 ❑
Qther Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

t
Division of Water Quality
Facility umber - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
" lb �.� -. p Other Agency
Type of Visit: iFCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: *Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: logj= Arrival Time: 01—(-, Raft �Departure Time: ► o `County: Region:
Farm Name: t C t VW S Owner Email:
Owner Name: <2� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: }
Certified Operator: C�, s ��. C..l
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedej
Farrow to Finish
Other
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: Z �'
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Design Current c
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
1
r
❑ Yes)840U-0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ Noc6E§t❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes []No Iti:F NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

r
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [3 NA CD NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:]Yes ❑ No,:fEWA ❑ NE
S ructuxq 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes h�73— ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[DNA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 4gatr
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes � NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application r
�❑
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of
A` ved Area
12. Crop Type(s):i"
13. Soil Type(s): Mom,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes tlo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ W UP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps [] Lease Agreements
21. Does rec keeping need improvem If yes, check th propriate box below.
❑ Yes I__l i''o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dJgo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _ J�P&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes�No ❑ A ❑ NE
❑ Other:
r[�j �Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ n ee beaFcl_ 1 sis al sis U Wa_s7e'rra!§T5Fr-0"0Weather Code
rl Rainfall ❑ Stocking Crop Yield [] 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

FA I Faeffity Number: jDate of Inspection:
4Yes
% lC3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? N ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Lfgo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No" ; A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ��o
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were high ma
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes%-'Bro ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-ap ca on
31. Do subsurfacc tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes�',53o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application. Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ Yes NA
❑ Ye o ❑ NA
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

iv[slon of Water Quality -
'Facility Number = © 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Tlme: D Departure Time: d2; ounty: Region:
Farm Name: t y' 1 �`- �� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Numbe
Back-up Operator: RZ Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude: l
Design Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
/4�op\
Wean to Finish
I ILayer
Wean to Feeder
I INon-Layer
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Farrow to Feeder
Dry Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
j
Other
—.Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Ocher
Other
�• r:
�f1w
DischarEes and Stream ImDacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes (] No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �] NA [] NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ s No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Condnued

Facility Number: jDate of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment r
R_L�E
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Ye o NA ONE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:]No
NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate o tegrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Ye o [3 NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
oNE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YeA ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bar4SO'
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
ecklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye N
❑ NE
❑ Yes]
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye o A ❑ NE
❑Oth
­017-
Yes NA NE
❑ WU Application ❑ Waekly F�eebaard Waste Soil Analysis ELWaste rs Wea er Code
'tnfall ocki rop Yield Qt2U mute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections udge S ey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yea o ❑ N ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

r Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:]No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to pr er y dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that yr
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Ye r ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Offsc ncy situations as required by the 4e&[:] NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboar a ver-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
sfer to question #): Fxplain any YES answers and/or any additional recom
of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Nil
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
ons or any other cornm6ts.
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 V4,2011

y.1
r
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
March 2, 2017
Thomas C. Williams
T.C. Williams Farm, Inc.
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28689
t ° 6 ago P
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
T.C. Williams Farm, fne.fFacility 49-17
General Permit AWC490017
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Williams:
On February 28, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected T.C. Williams Farm, Inc, and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Charlie L. Williams, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated February 28, 2017
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 23115
704-663-1699

4
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWC490017
Denied Access
Inppectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed hate:
Reason for visit: Routine County:
Iredell Region:
Mooresville
Date of visit: 02/28/2017 Entry Time: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 2:30 pm incident #
Farm Name: T.C. Williams Farm, Inc.
Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas C Williams
Phone:
704-592-2338
Mailing Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 286899205
Physical Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 286899205
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude:
36' 01' Longitude:
81° 00' 00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Unney Mill. Turn left on Burke
Rd.
Farm is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.Question
Areas:
Areas:
Dischrge $ Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams Operator Certification Number. 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Willlams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
11/21/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.50 Lbs11000 Gallons
06/21/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.36 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/26/16 > Solt Analysis
jb
Phone: 4- 3-1699 Exi _
Date: 7
page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 02/28/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle -Dairy Calf
85
25
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
80
20
Cattle - Dry Caw
35
13
A Cattle - Milk Cow
200
110
Total Design Capacity: 400
Total SSLW: 438,750
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond W5P 24.00 32,00
page: 2

C
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 02/28/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Me
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑0
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes Na Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Cl
- Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

L
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility Number. 490017
Inspection Date: 02/26/17 ' inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Na
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Cerbfied Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yet No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ N ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
[j ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
[]
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
[]
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility : Thomas C Williams Facility Number:
490017
Inspection Date: 02/28/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
You No Ns No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
[]
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ E
❑
Other Issues
Yes No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ N ❑ ❑
page: 5

r.
- �,� 3_t � >,� max., - � �' :_ :�. � �
>°N�A�C,S:A'/�cilncf�ic.�v�r
.... � .. _,;.- ... ..� F .• ... /. -_, �y`.���- ,w�-. �_-.� y�� �y y�e}, ea.k3K �.ay'.sf �-.:. w:t'+�a»ipa
4...>« l s
� � • -
n it f i kWpe%�R�:.yts ����L.�IL�A� ..:?I'.
f it MAL,
G Predictive
Client:
Charlie Williams
T C Williams Farm Inc.
139 Burke Farm Loop
Advisor:
,
G Soil Report
Links to Helpful information
Mehlich-3 Extraction
Union Grove, NC 28689
Sample County: Iredell
Client ID57
Advisor ID:
Sampled: 12/2112016 Received:
12/26/2016 Completed: 02116/2017
F—= 49-17
Sample ID: 1
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
KzO
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
0.0 180-220 0
60
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2 -Small Grain (SG)
0.0 80-100 0
10
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - W/V in g/crr>l�; GEC and Na in meq/100 crrr3; NO3-N in mgldo]:
Soil Class. Mineral
HM% WIV GEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-1
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 0.97 11.6 88 1.4 6.2
250 70 63 22 51
201
135 128 824
824
758 0.2 2
Sample ID: 2
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Corn, silage
0.5 180-220 0
50
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0 80-100 0
10
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in glcr&; CEC and Na in meq/100 crrr3; NO3-N in mgldo]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K4 Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.51 0.97 11.1 83 1.9 5.8
244 77 59 20 56
169
118 ill 1028
1028
833 0.2 2
Sample ID: 3
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Infortnation
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
0.8 180-220 0
40
0 0 0
0
0 0
Nate: 3
2 -Small Grain (SG)
0.0 80-100 0
0
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - W1V in glcrrii.; CEC and Na in meg1100 crrr3; NO3-N in mgldr(P]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.56 0.99 10.6 82 1.9 5.6
230 85 59 19 59
150
107 100 1002
1002
790 0.2 2
North Carolina
r>D6woco TnW lr Cmwk rae
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Trox

•
NC> ► C Agxgnomic Division- Pf[one: (91 2655
W6whe: wwW.acagt govlagrotrorriil
ReportNo.
FYIVS1:023�M
Charlie Williams
Page 2 of 6
Sample ID: 4
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1- Corn, silage
1.0
180-220 0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in glcd; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm;]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn AI2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.60 1.01 9.8
79 2.1 5.5
190 50
5B 18
50
131
96
89
722
722
634
0.2
2
Sample ID: 5
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (Ib/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
0.0
180-220 . 0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results junits - W1V in
g/cd; CEC and Na in meq/100 cd; NO3-N In mg/drr>;]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
MnAl2
Zn-I
Zn AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.36 1.03 13.2
89 1.4 6.2
320 98
61 24
57
95
71
64
1266
1266
1028
0.3
2
Sample ID: 6
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
0.0
180-220 0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in
glenf; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/drrP]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS -I NO3-N
0.46 1.03 13.0
86 1.8 6.0
305 100
60 23
61
106
80
73
1207
1207
994
0.3
2
Sample ID: - 7
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1- Com, silage
0.0
180-220 0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in
glen ; CEC and Na in meq/100 cO; NO3-N in mgldrrP]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-I
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.41 1.03 12.5
88 1.5 6.1
29B 93
61 23
59
103
78
71
1195
1195
975
0.3
2

OmIclom. oft
9 rbfi ii
hcW.�.qov ao!on
Charlie Williams
Page 3 of 6
Sample ID: 8
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (ib/acre)
ore
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P206
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
nation
Information
Lime History:
1- Com, silage
0.0
180-220 0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in g/crii; CEC and Na in meq/100 cO; NO3-N in mgIdno):
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K4
Ca% Mq%
S4
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.41 1.06 11.9
85 1.7 5.9
295 91
60 21
54
116
87
80
1349
1349
1057
0.2
2
Sample ID: 9
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonstacre)
N P206
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
0.9
180-220 0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in g/crrP; GEC and Na in meq/100 cO; NO3-N in mgldnol:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mq%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.56 1.01 8.9
78 2.0 5-5
192 70
56 18
48
120
89
82
668
668
522
0.2
2
Sample ID: 10
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P206
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
1.0
180-220 0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in g/cO; CEC and Na in meq/100 cn-P; NO3-N in mg/drifl:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0,56 1.02 9.2
75 2.3 5.5
188 69
54 17
49
116
87
80
650
650
524
0.2
2
Sample ID: 11
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonsfacre)
N P206
K2O
Mg
3
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History;
1- Corn, silage
1.1
180-220 0
70
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note-. 3
Test Results [units - W/V in g1crif; CEC and Na in meq/100 crrP; NO3-N in mg/driift
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
C3% Mq%
S.1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.56 1-02 9.4
75 2A 5.5
184 66
54 17
52
115
86
79
633
633
505
02 2

HA&SlgranodhiC:Division Phone. (89) 73;3-265
wwW targoY/Ag�ontrif
Repott No...:
i=1'171,023496
Charlie Williams
Page 4 of 6
Sample ID: 12
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
0.3
180-220 0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results (units -Will in gled; CEC and Na in meg1100 cnr1; NO3-N in mgldnrl]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 0.94 11.2
83 1.9 5.9
261 70
60 19
48
93
73
66
724
724
808
0.2
2
Sample ID: 13
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (Ib/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
1.7
180-220 0
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2- Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in glcmP; CEC and Na in megh00 cral; NO3-N In mgldd]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac. pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S4
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.76 1.03 7.2
62 2.7 5.0
185 39
46 14
55
103
79
72
540
540
471
0.1
1
Sample 10: 14
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients(lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
1.8
180-220 0
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in glcrrrl; CEC and Na in meq/100 carp; NO3-N in mg/dnrl]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.71 1.00 7.6
60 3.0 5.1
181 40
45 13
58
100
77
70
543
543
437
0.2
3
Sample ID: 15
Recommendations;
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com, silage
1.6
180-220 0
120
0
0
0
0
7UB
Note: 3
2 -Small Grain (SG)
0.0
80-100 0
60
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in glcnrl; CEC and Na in meq/100 crrP; NO3-N in mg/derl]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 Kd
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-AN
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS 1 NO3-N
0.76 1.04 7.2
65 2.6 5.1
185 37
48 14
49
105
60
73
570
570
458
0.1
1

Charlie Williams
Page 5of6
Sample ID: 16
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lblacre)
More
Crop (tons/acre)
N P20r,
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
a
Information
Lime History:
I . Com, silage 0.0
180-220 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note. 3
2- Small Grain (SG) 0.0
80-100 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in 91cd; CEC and Na in meq/1 00 cd; NO3-N in mg/do]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC
BS% Ac PH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S4
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.36 1.01 10.9
89 1.2 6.5 197 139
57 26
44
108
75
68
770
770
583
0.2
2
Sample ID: 17
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tonslacre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
I - Com, silage 0.0
180-220 0
0
0
0
pH$
0
0
0
Note: 3 Note:$
2 - Smalf Grain (SG) 0.0
80-100 0
0
0
0
pH$
0
0
0
Note: 3 Note:
Test Results [units - WN in g/crrf, CEC and No in meq/100 crrP; NO3-N in mg/drr?]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WIV CEC
BS% Ac PH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
No
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.41 0.99 12.9
93 0.9 66 253 225
56 28
58
144
94
87
768
768
775
0.3
2
Sample ID: 18
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (Vacre)
More
Crop (tonslacre)
N P206
KzO
Mg
3
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -FescuetOGrass/Tim, M 0.0
120-200 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
2 -FescuelOGrassfTim, M 0.0
120200 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/ed ; CEC and Na in maqM 00 cnlp; NO3-N in mg/dr&]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC
BS% Ac PH P4 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn AI
Cu-I
No '
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 0.99 9.0
83 1.5 6.0 147 157
50 24
41
99
76
76
447
447
317
0.1
1
Sample ID: 19
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre)
N P2065
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1- Fescue/OGrassrrim, M 0.7
120-200 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
2- FescuelOGrassrrim, M 0.0
120-200 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
Test Results (units - WN in g/cd; CEC and No in maq/100 cd; NO3-N in mg/dol:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC
BS% Ac PH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
No
ESP
SS -I NO3-N
0,51 0.96 9.6
79 2.0 5.7 174 182
47 23
52
78
64
64
505
505
311
0.2
2

TC�4bI�S#g rlDnorr+ic tlnrrsrsn Phone 91 Website�;wwwnagrgov7agtalrflt "'
' („
RepQrtiYo : Fly?71r02496
.9)733-26v5
Charlie Williams
Page 6 of 6
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a Time recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 lb/1000 sq ft) at ono
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for Meld crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-I
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified)_ Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-AI2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
M-0
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutn'ents_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
neagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NOs-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.gov/aaronomi/obpart4.hnd information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help ypu choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/1l
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, WN, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zi AI
zinc availability index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-1, Mn-All, Mrt-Al2, Zn-I, Zn-Al, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
Zn-I
zinc index
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncacrcoylaaronomi/umt.htm

Division ofWater 'Quality
r.. _...
FacilityNumber 0..Divisian of Soil and Water Conservation
_ 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: AJ�Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: OV Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: d Arrival Time: Departure Time: o County:
Farm Name:, C „ N �, Yam' y'�S IZ Owner Email:
Owner Na _ Phone:
Mailing
Physical
Facility
0
Onsite Rep resen
Certified or:�
q =�' L, �
Back-up Operator: `� \ v�0 a
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Integrator:
Certification
Certification
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
a
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
on -
Other I ITurkeyPoults
Other Other
Discharaes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the -conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Region: 0126
Design . Current
)2attle ,, pacify Pap.
M;M'A
M��461�
AbrH
zoMrMM%4jM,,.
a .
Mr-5U�MoM.�
I
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
/r
❑ Yes ❑ N NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Ye No "� 1 ` ❑ NE
❑ s ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment y
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
;tUrI�Str�ucture2Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): (—�Sen
5. Are there any immediate is to cue tlty of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Nc:IA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yez o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes '§Io ❑ NA [] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any re
or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes:. o ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes,hjs,q ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evid9nce of Wind 12nft ❑ AppIication OutsidqdApprovA Area
12. Crop Types): s� C-�IA -01
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
19. Did the facility fail to have
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the GAWMI' r yes, check
the appropriate box. -
❑ NE
❑ Yes IRW ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
E14
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NE
NE
F�NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
ec s estgn aps Lease Agreements Other:
tae
oes record keeping nee vement? If yes, ch appropriate box ❑ Ye o NA NE
Weekl Freebo S '1 Analysis ❑ Weather Code
alltocking field 0 in ections onthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to tall and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes�,1Vo ❑ NA NE
-" je'
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continuer!

Facffi Number: jDate of Inspection: 4
t 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? AWA❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check i es ❑ No ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance.
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facil' imals with 24 hours
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of norgency situation as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-apptl ion
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ NE
❑ Yes.eMNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o 0 NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o [] NA ❑ NE
Comments refer to question Explain an YES answers and/or an additional recdtfimendations'or any other comments:
C q. �� P Y Y Y
IJse, drawings; of, facility to better explain situations (use additional pages :as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
2✓412011

V Y
C
mt�
T. C. Williams Farm Inc.
139 Burke Farm Loop ��—
o-
Union
Grove, NC 28689-9205
Facility No. 49-17
Iredell County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
200 Milk Cows
35 Dry Cows
80 Heifers
85 Calves
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
NC DENR, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resource Conservation Service
July 21, 2004
AQUJFPR'RROTF(71"N tiro, i tUN
MAR 2 0 2009

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
07-21-2004
This plan has been prepared for:
T. C. Williams Farm Inc.
T C Willliams
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28689-9205
704-592-2338
This plan has been developed by:
C Lipe Barrier, Jr,, Environmental Spec. II
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ext. 3 '
a /,, -,�,
Developer eignature,
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
_ established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
✓� the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Y le - 6, 7, C - V
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adapted by the San and Water
Conservation Commission.
L
Plan Approved By: Z Za d
Technical Gecialist Signature Date
- ---- -- --- ----- -- ------ --- -
664954 Database Version 3.1
.................... ------------------------------------------
Date Printed: 07-2I-2004 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
AQUIFFR-PRnTFr..TinN, 4FCTIQN
MAR 2 0 ?qqq

T. C. Williams Dairy Map
and Field Legend
Field Number Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irri,2ated Acres
Land Use
�
ract 411
Mayberry -Harrington
Map 1
Bottoms
1
22.7
22.7
Cropland
2
9.1
9.1
Cropland
2A
16.3
16.3
Hayland
3
7.0
7.0
Cropland
4
7.2
6.9
Cropland
5
9.0
9.0
Cropland
6
16.5
16.5
Cropland
7
3.3
3.0
Hayland
8
1.3
1.3
Cropland
9
8.6
8.6
Cropland
9A
2.0
2.0
Hayland
10
2.2
2.2
Hayland
Tract 534
Dottie Place
Map 7
1
40.0
38.8
Cropland
Tract 587
Home Farm
Map 3
Irrigation. Map
Map 4
Some Irrigation
Pulls extend in to additional fields. Application rates are limited to lowest
PAN of the crops within the pull.
1
2.6
2.6
Hayland
2
10.0
10.0
Pasture
3
22.1
5.0
Pasture
4
20.2
3.0
Pasture
4-1
5.0
5.0
Pasture
4-2
7.9
7.9
Pasture
4-3
5.2
5.2
Pasture
4-4
7.2
7.2
Pasture
4-5
6.7
6.7
Pasture
4-6
6.1
6.1
Pasture
7
16.8
8.6
Pasture
7-1
8.2
8.2
Pasture
8
38.0
15.8
Pasture
8-1
6.2
6.2
Pasture
8-2
6.8
6.8
Pasture
8-3
5.2
5.2
Pasture
Page 1

' T. C. Williams Dairy Map
and Field Legend
Field Number Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irritated Acres
Land Use
Tract 587 Continued
Map 3
9
19.0
8.1
Pasture
9-1
8.1
8.1
Pasture
9-2
7.3
7.3
Pasture
9-3
6.8
6.8
Pasture
9A
13.0
6.0
Pasture
10
2.0
2.0
Pasture
11
75.0
10.5
Cropland
11-1`
3.0
3.0
Cropland
11-2
2.6
2.6
Cropland
11-3
6.2
6.2
Cropland
11-4
7.3
7.3
Cropland
11-5
6.5
6.5
Cropland
11-6
7.3
7.3
Cropland
11-7
7.3
7.3
Cropland
11-8
8.1
8.1
Cropland
11-9
8.1
8.1
Cropland
11-10
8.1
8.1
Cropland
11 G
5.0
5.0
Hayland
12
2.9
2.9
Hayland
_
13
2.0
2.0
Cropland
14
24.5'
2.3
Cropland
14-1
8.1
8.1
Cropland
14-2
7.3
7.3
Cropland
14-3
6.8
6.8
Cropland
14G
4.0
4.0
Hayland
15
$A
8.0
Cropland
16
5.7
5.7
Cropland
Tract 629
Bunny Williams Place
Map 2
1
20.2
19.5
Cropland
Tract 630
Bennie Williams Place
Map 3
1
18.4
18.4
Hayland
2
5.2
5.2
Hayland
Tract 1397
Dickens Place
Map 9
1
38.5
38.5
Cropland
2
17.0
17.0
Cropland
2G
1.5
1.5
Hayland
Page 2

T. C. Williams
Dairy Map
and Field Legend
Field Number Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irrigated Acres Land Use
Tract 1415
Reid Place
Map 6
1
20.5
19.8
Cropland
2
7.6
7.3
Cropland
Tract 1416
Margaret Welborn Place Map 5
1
1.6
1.6
Cropland
2
5.4
5.4
Cropland
Tract 1417
Coytt Williams Place
Map 5
1
4.5
4.5
Cropland
2
2.7
2.7
Cropland
3
7.2
7.2
Cropland
4
1.6
1.6
Cropland
Tract 5842
Speaks Place
Map 8
1
36.0
35.7
Cropland
Page 3

,��
,� }
��'� ti ;'
'' ;. „ .
,�,' � ,b
�. , ,��;
t ' +' ,
� �`°
� Y ,, � � �
r3.,i,. f_'AU� .. �4

T. C. Williams Dairy
4-5 4- Irrigation Map
NT. C. Williams Farm Inc. _4-2 �-4 \ ' I� Facility No. 49-17 in Grove. NC
I Feld 3
I I I I
Pipe key
f I I I
! I I I
I I
rP SR r� P,a.
7-1
Field 4
I CO !
I I r
l ! la !
I r
1 I Field 7
I l ~ ,+
! 1 8-3% .
`� 1
I 1 Field 8 +
4-1.-
4-3 l P-� 8-2 `'+ I
le
sprinkler / valve key
I"
-3 i1 � vT+ww4r Lm.ur.w .F,en m s NLPaw
`11-10 ev,.I drw.1 • Fr, WeY.N. V
�i IS OW w,t r Trr-Awf n V.N. 9'
1 Meld 114 11-2 4-______—__—_ Lsco..,
I , > ! � 1i-1 = �-- spUMa%,
I ! �/ ♦ ` I Feld 14 Feld 15
I > `�
f I I ield9A 11� > > > 1 �}--_--_---- 14-2
9-3 14
9-1 ; 9-2 > Field 11 t=7 !
�`% >
TFT-s RLi35 FAE TG BE L=Tla AT
t EMIT � IN PFE QLEL71H
19 aw. ELE�F. mw Flw PM.
%NTw"M. W&S RL ELCmsi
�, � RM Tract 587
> T `Lint i n- Vlt1E is A PIESS
> �11-5 FORW-19 PHO LE-V Irrigation Fulls
t > > Gra-Mac Distributing Co.
t �> =0 NC Hwy- am N
lioclirvi le, NC 2702E
Phone [phone];i2
I1-9 f Fax Ana-aea sill
- \ ~_ / b. s.sv.►wa u..d.a� Designed by, Jason Graham
' Date:
Scale I" - 600, Deswn Na 12B

s Irs i (y bri iplL '4: F LocationField i Williams Farm
Facility No. 49-17
't l dh 01
$ ({fit�u �d�tk a e�F wq Y �ff�s
7: iy � '#i' C •�,•�; Fi �` r by � Y I a� • F �- R �.
N,�
f
r 4x Ir P I A `I 'I
4 �+
.
� §d
�'Wtt r I � rah. � _ =�-� �,.: .,�y � `�'n,,. - �� ♦ �,a i
wf 1 aaf f I Aat _ 4`'err`
bL
L ! i
Tract 1415
I
a
I r
,. 1. .. .� ., �- _• '.
da
x: Reid
Place
OR 5

9*
i.. � '� a � S E b `�° nrh 14r 4t�y 4 ��i�' r'° 4 y. •, r
ti; io ��� ,•tom v.5 u���k ��- F' x " s�'.. .�'� �,� i ir. x...y
:a��,'; �. ..s,. ,� y ��w"�. ijyl,�Y.{i_.,RAlfai�' -•L:�i
'
'?Location
ap
Facility No. 49-17
ft
��.+��eil*�+.v .• x'�` to '�1� „��r�, a �_F ���+' � �` �.
.cyC"*—'�!• +t'1' � �S h h t ":a"a '�' r y .r;., y, . r � ". d {��w iG'. �.+k �a �`�4 �"' �4F�s,
prar '� 11°Yi � N F'r KR 7 1' •� 5 kS�FI��','�:w� A � ;:'�
�Jr��'� F lays x;"R•'°�F.• ' Fv4���.
¢
drhliyy�r{�� 1t; qei}' � � A 7, ; t �S.Rq� y y4'�'�✓ '"W�,�,1y h ,`.lye r'w ;E', r d
1*0
r,
s r^� •. - -..� t�, z Qom. -
f
a
y
fat- - S` •. t;� `•- �}
r.
'rt14 �� � � t ay {• ,
TEA... 's:Y A r F w

-� T. C Williams Farm Inc.
The farm is operated by T. C. Williams, Son, Charlie Williams and Son in Law, Tony
Redmond. A 200 head Milking herd and 200 head of dry cows, heifers and calves are
managed on this farm. Wet dairy waste and contaminated runoff is collected as slurry
and spread by irrigation or tank spreader on cropland and pasture. Some waste is
collected as solids and spread on adjacent pasture and hayland
Is) "Is] a►MI11 *y
This plan is set up for a two year cropping system, but some systems with grass for
pasture or hay may last S or more years. For record keeping, continue to use the listed
PAN amounts for the crop and field.
Plant Available Nitrogen or PAN is the nitrogen that the planned crop can utilize during
the growing season based on the management system used. Broadcast spreading and
irrigation are the systems used on this farm.
Animal waste can only be applied to land that will be harvested. In the event of crop
failure after animal waste has been applied, replant another crop that can use the
nutrients.
_ The PAN for corn grown for silage, but not needed and harvested as grain, will need a
reduction by 45% due the reduction of crop residue harvested.
Small Grain grown for silage, but not needed and harvested for grain, will need no
reduction since the PAN is nearly the same. If small grains are grown for a cover crop,
only 30 ibs. of PAN can be applied, and that amount must be deducted form the
following crop.
The PAN for crops following soybeans must be reduced by 151bs. to account for the
nitrogen carry over by legumes. If Alfalfa is grown, the PAN would need to be reduced
by SO lbs. for the following crop.
The symbol* is shown beside some RYE and PAN amounts in the Waste Utilization
Tables. Approved RYE and PAN data for these crops are not available for the soil types
they are being grown on and I have used yield data for similar soils in the area.
Some irrigation pulls cross more than field and in some cases more than one crop. Waste
application is limited to the lowest PAN of the crops covered.
RECORD KEEPING
All animal waste applications should be sampled and recorded at time of spreading or
irrigating and test results used for computing animal waste applications. This

information, along with soil test results, provides information on the additional nutrients
needed for producing the desired crops.
ANIMAL WASTE SOURCES
Some Dairy Animals included in this section and on the Source Page are included in both
sources due to waste for 35 animals being collected as both slurry and solids.
U1— T C Williams Dairy Slurry
2,797,000 gals. /year of animal waste, wash water, lot runoff and contaminated
rainfall are collected from 315 confined dairy animals.
This waste source contains 14,175 lbs. of Plant Available Nitrogen or PAN.
See the Waste Management System Design by Samuel C. Bingham dated
10/24/97, Section III, A, B, C and Section VI, C located in the back of the folder
for support information.
U2 — TC Williams Dairy Solids
12,529 cu.ft. of Dairy Solids are collected from 120 confined dairy animals x 62
lbs./cu.ft. divided by 2000 lbs./ton = 450.4 tons of Dairy Solids.
This waste source contains 1,936 lbs. of Plant Available Nitrogen or PAN.
See the Waste Management System Design by Samuel C. Bingham dated
10/24//97, Section VI, A and C located in the back of this folder for support
information.

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
_source(s):
^� Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
D
U1
TC Williams Dairy Slurry waste generated 2,797,000 gals/year by a 315 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
16005
Incorporated
21824
Inj ected
24734
Irrigated
14550
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
16,005
70167
-54,162
13,102,583
-10,305,583
Year 2
16,005
64359
-48,354
12,065,712
-9,268,712
U2
ITC Williams Dairy Solids waste generated 450.36 tons/year by a 120 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1937
Incorporated
2567
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
1,937
91846
-89,909
21,359.26
-20,908.90
Year 2
1,937
88461
-86,524
20,572.04
-20,121.68
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.............
1 Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-21-2004 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below srrmtnarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use_
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Read
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
Caere)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1.000 gals
tons
1397
1
U2
Madison
38.50
38.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
46
0.00
10-70
0.00
411.8
1397
1
U2
Madison
38.50
38.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
4/1-9/15
121
0
1 0
Broad.
121
0.00
28.1
0.00
1,083.3
1397
2
U2
Cecil
17.00
17.00
Small Crain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/3I
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.
0.00
211.51
1397
2
U2
Cecil
17.00
17.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33.49
0.00
569.2
1397
2G
U2
Cecil
1.50
1.50
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/3I
178
0
0
Broad,
178
0.00
41.39
0.00
62.0
1415
1
U2
Cecil
20.50
19.80
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
*20
Broad.
211
0.00
49.071
0.00
971.57
1415
1
U2
Cecil
20.50
19.80
Small Grainy Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
257.8
1415
2
U2
Chewacla-P
7.60
7.30
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
291
0
*20
Broad.
271
0.00
63.02
0.00
460.06
1415
2
U2
ewacla-P
7.60
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.05
0.00
80.64
1416
1
U2
ewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15W30
291
0
*20
Broad.
271
0.00
63.02
0.00
100.94
1416
1
U2
Chewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.05
0.00
17.68
1416
2
U2
Buncombe
5.40
5.40
Cum, Silage
10.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
109
0
*20
Broad.
89
0.00
20.70
0.00
111.77
1416
2
U2
Buncombe
5.40
5A0
Small Grain, Silage
5.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
56
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
6.51
0.00
35.16
1417
1
U2
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6130
305
0
*20
Broad.
285
0.00
66.28
0.00
298.25
1417
1
U2
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
911-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
12.91
0.00
58.0
1417
2
U2
Cecil
2.7
2.70
Corn, Silage
18A Ton
2115-6/30
201
0
*20
Broad.
191
0.00
42.0
0.00
113.E
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 1 of 18

Waste Ut4'n Table
t-)Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field).
N
N
N
N
1000
gpYA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1417
2
U2
Cecil
2.70
2.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11.40
0.00
30.77
1417
3
U2
Congaree
7.20
7.20
Cam, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
305
0
*20
Broad.
285
0.00
66.28
0.00
477.2
1417
3
U2
Congaree
7.2
7.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
911-3131
111
0
0
Broad.
5
0.00
12.91
0.00
92.93
1417
4
U2
hewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
291
0
*20
Broad.
271
0.00
63.02
0.00
100.84
1417
4
U2
ewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.05
0.00
17.68
411
1
U2Riverview-P
22.70
22.70
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
2115-6130
240
0
*20
Broad.
220
0.00
51.16
0.00
1,161.38
411
1
U2
Riverview-P
22.70
22.70
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
263.9
411
2
U2
Braddock-P
9.10
9.10
Corn, Silage
15.7 Ton
2/15-6/30
171
0
*20
Broad.
151
0.00
35.12
0.00
319.55
411
2
U2Braddock-P
9.10
9.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
58
0.00
13.37
0.00
121.E
411
2A
Ul
ver Acw-P
16.30
16.30
Fescue Hay
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
200
0
0
Broad.
100
17.48
0.00
294.86
0.00
411
2A
Ul
Riverview-P
16.30
16.30
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad.
240
41.94
0.00
683.67
0.00
411
2A
UI
Riverview-P
16.30
16.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
8.74
0.00
142.43
0.00
411
3
U2
Riverview-P
7.00
7.00
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6130
240
0
*20
Broad.
220
0.00
51.1
0.00
358.13
411
3
U2
Riverview-P
7.00
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0-00
11.63
0.00
81.4
411
4
U2
Riverview-P
7.20
6.90
Com, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
240
0
*20
Broad.
22
0-00
51J6
0.00
353.02
411
4
U2
Riverview-P
7.20
6.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
80.23
411
5
U2
Riverview-P
9.00
9.00
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
2JI5-/30
240
0
*20
Broad.
220
0.00
51.16
0.00
460.46
411
5
U2
Riverview-P
9.00
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
104.65
411
6
U2
hewacla-P
16.50
16.50
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
291
0
*20
Broad.
271
0.00
63.02
0.00
1,039.87
411
6
U2
ewacla-P
16.50
16.50
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.05
0.00
182.27
411
7
UI
Braddock-P
3.30
3.00
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
107
18.61
0.00
55.84
0.00
411
7
Ul
Braddock-P
3.30
3.00
Corn, Silage
14.4 Ton
2/15-/30
157
0
0
Broad.
157
27.44
0.00
82.31
0.00
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 2 of 18

Waste Utilk a Table -)Year 1
Tract
Feld
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
OWA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsrA)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)_
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tans
1000 gals
tons
411
7
UIBraddock-P
3.30
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
28.05
0.00
411
8
U2Riverview-P
1.30
1.30
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tan
2/15-6130
240
0
*20
Broad_
220
0.00
51.16
0.00
66.51
411
8
U2
Riverview-P
1.30
1.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
15.12
411
9
U2
Riverview-P
8.60
8.60
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
2/15-6130
240
0
*20
Broad.
220
0-00
51A6
0.00
439.99
411
9
U2
'verview-P
8.60
8.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
1 L63
0.00
100.00
411
9A
Ul
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Fescue Flay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
107
18.61
0.00
37.27
0.00
411
9A
Ul
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
14A Ton
2115-6130
157
0
0
Broad.
157
27.44
0-00
5C88
0.00
411
9A
UlBraddock-P
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
18.70
0.00
411
10
UIBraddock-P
2.20
2.20
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
107
18.61
0.00
40.95
0.00
411
10
UI
dock-P
2.20
2.20
Corn, Silage
14A Ton
2/15-6/30
157
0
0
Broad.
157
27.44
0.00
60.36
0.0
411
10
UI
Braddock-P
2.20
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
20.57
0.00
534
1
U2
Cecil
40.00
38.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
58
0.00
13.37
0.00
518.83
534
1
U2
Cecil
40.00
38.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9/15
156
0
0
Broad.
156
0.00
36.28
0.00
1,407.61
5942
1
U2
Cecil
36.00
35.70
Small Gain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
464.93
5842
1
U2
Cecil
36.00
35.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9115
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.00
35.35
0.00
1,261.93
587
1
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.00
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
102
17.83
0.00
35.65
0.00
587
1
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.00
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
40.37
0.00
80.74
0.00
587
1
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
56
9.79
0.00
19.57
0.00
587
2
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
I5.47
0.00
154.65
587
2
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
0.00
53.72
0.00
537.2
587
2
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad_
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
130.23
587
3
U2
Cecil
22.10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
15.47
0.00
77.33
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 10/21/2004 W-JT Page Page 3 of 18

Waste UtilL-uo Table
I
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)_
N
N
PI
N
1000
VVA
Tons
1000 gals
toes
587
3
U2
Cecil
22.10
5.00
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
0.00
53.72
0.00
268.60
587
3
U2
Cecil
22.10
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
65.1
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
15.47
0.00
46.4
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Com, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
0.00
53.72
0.00
161.1
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
39.07
587
4-1
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
153
0
0
irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
63.92
0.00
587
4-1
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Com, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
brig.
731
44.41
0.00
222.04
0-00
587
4-1
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
53.83
0.00
587
4-2
U1
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
100.99
0.00
587
4-2
U1
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Com, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
brig.
231
44.41
0.00
350.82
0.00
587
4-2
UI
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
85.05
0.00
587
4-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
153
0
0
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
66.48
0.00
587
4-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Com, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Irrig.
231
44.41
0.00
230.92
0.00
587
4-3
Ul
Cecil
510
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
55.98
0.00
587
4-4
Ul
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
153
0
0
trig.
67
12.78
0.00
92.04
0.00
587
4-4
Ul
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Com, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
brig.
231
44.41
0.00
319.73
0.001
587
4-4
Ul
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
77.51
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil
6.70
6.70
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
85.65
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil
6.70
6.70
Com, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-/30
231
0
0
Irrig.
231
44.41
0.00
297.53
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil
6,70
6.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Prig.
56
10.77
0.00
72.13
0.00
587
4-6
U1
Cecil
6.10
6.10
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
77.98
0.00
587
4-6
TUl
Cecil
6.10
6.10
1Corn, Silage
I.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
1 0
1 0
brig.
231
44.41
0.00
270.89
0.00
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 4 of 18

Waste Util� ;n Table )Year 1 J
Tract
Feld
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Coma.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
OtWA)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Man reA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
587
4-6
Ul
Cecil
6.10
6.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
65.67
0.00
587
7
U2
Cecil
16.80
8.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
62
0.00
14.30
0.00
123.00
587
7
U2
it
16.80
8.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
50.70
0.00
435.99
587
7
U2
Cecil
16.80
8.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
107.00
587
7-1
U1
ecil
8.20
8.20
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
brig.
62
11.82
0.00
96.95
0.00
587
7-1
U1
ecil
8.20
8.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
41.91
0.00
343.65
0.00
587
7-I
Ul
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
54
10.29
0.00
94.34
0.00
587
8
U2
Cecil
38.00
15.80
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
0
0
Broad.
62
0.00
14.30
0.00
225.98
587
8
U2
Cecil
38.00
15.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
50.70
0.00
801.01
587
8
U2
Cecil
38.00
15.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
I96.5
587
8-1
Ul
Cecil
620
6.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
153
0
0
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
79.26
0.00
587
8-1
UI
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-WO
231
0
0
Irrig.
231
44.41
0.00
275.33
0.00
587
8-1
Ul
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
66.75
0.00
587
8-2
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
86.93
0.00
587
8-2
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
trig.
231
44.41
0.00
301.97
0.00
587
8-2
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Inig.
56
10.77
0.00
73.21
0.00
587
8-3
UL
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
66.48
0.00
587
8-3
U1
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6/30
231
0
0
Irrig.
231
44.41
0-00
230.92
0.00
587
8-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
55.98
0.00
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
0
0
Broad.
62
0.00
14.30
0.00
115.8
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
50.70
0.00
410.64
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.
12.44
0.00
100.78
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 5 of 18

Waste Utili a Table /dear 1
Tract
Feld
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
mod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Wd
(lbs1A)
Comm.
Fart
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
OWA)
I
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Yield)_
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons.
587
9-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Lrig.
62
11.82
0.00
95.76
0.00
587
9-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
41.91
0.00
330.46
0.00
587
9-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
54
10.29
0.00
83.31
0.00
587
9-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
0
0
Irrig.
62
11.82
0.00
86.31
0.0
587
9-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
41.91
0.00
305.93
0.00
587
9-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
54
10.29
0.00
75.08
0.00
587
9-3
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Irrig.
62
11.82
0.00
80.39
0.00
587
9-3
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/l5-b/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
41.91
0-00
284.98
0.00
587
9-3
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
trrig.
54
10.2
0-00
69.94
0.00
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
57
0.00
13.14
0.00
78.94
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Corn, Silage
18.4 Ton
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
46.74
0.00
280.4
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11.40
0.00
68.37
587
10
U2
Conga=
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
8/1-7131
166
0
0
Broad.
73
0.00
16.98
0.00
33.9
587
10
U2
Congaree
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
305
0
0
Broad.
305
0.00
70.93
0.00
141.8
587
10
U2
Conga=
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3131
111
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
12.91
0.00
25.82
587
11
U2
Cecil
75.00
10.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
130.641
587
11
U2
Cecil
75.00
10.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33.4
0.00
351.E
587
11- 1
Ul
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
32.30
0.00
587
11- 1
Ul
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
87.66
0.00
587
11-2
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0,00
27.
0-00
587
11-2
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
411-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
75.97
0.00
587
11-3
Ul
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
TO
Itrig.
5
10.77
0.
66.75
0.00
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 6 of 18

Waste Utili�'-.n Table
'Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Uquid
ManumA
pplied
(sere)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field) .
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons -
587
11- 3
U1
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
brig.
152
29.22
0.
181.17
0.00
587
11- 4
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
78.59
0.00
587
11- 4
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
213.31
0.00
587
11- 5
Ul
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
69.98
0.00
587
11- 5
Ul
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
brig.
152
29.22
0,00
189.93
0.0
587
11- 6
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
78.59
0.00
587
1 I- 6
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig
152
29.22
0.00
213.31
0.00
587
11- 7
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
78.59
0.00
587
11- 7
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
411-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
213.31
0.00
587
11- 8
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8_10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
hrig.
56
10.77
0.00
87-20
0.00
587
11- 8
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
brig.
152
29.22
0.00
236.69
0.00
587
11- 9
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
87.20
0.00
587
11-9
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
brig.
152
29.22
0.00
236.69
0.00
587
1 I-10
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
87.20
0.00
587
11-10
UI
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
236.69
0.00
587
11G
U1
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
9/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
96
16.69
0.00
83.45
0.00
587
I IG
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-WO
218
0
0
Broad.
218
38.10
0.00
190.49
0.00
587
11G
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
46.75
0.00
587
12
U1
Cecil
2.90
2.90
Fescue Hay
4.9 Tons
9/1-7/31
218
0
0
Broad.
109
19.05
0.00
55.24
0.00
587
12
U1
Cecil
2.90
2.90
Corn, Silage
22.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
245
0
0
Broad.
245
42.82
0.00
124.17
0.00
587
12
UI
eel l
2.90
2.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Ton
9/1-3/31
120
0
0
Broad.
60
10.49
0.00
30.41
0.00
587
13
U2
it
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
1 Broad.
5
0.00
13.37
0.00
26.75
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WIJT Page Page 7 of 18

Waste Utili� ,n Table . Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(TWA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acne)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Feld) .
N
N
N
N
1000
g3UA
Tool
1000 gals
tons _
587
13
U2
Cecil
2.00
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9/15
156
0
0
Broad.
156
0.00
36.28
0.00
72.5
587
14
U2
Cecil
24.50
2.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
29.9
587
14
U2
Cecil
24.50
2.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.00
35.35
0.00
81-30.
587
14-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
S.10
Small Gain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-313I
112
0
0
brig.
5
10.77
0.00
87.20
0-00
587
14-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
236.69
0.00
587
14-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
78.59
0.00
587
14-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
213.31
0.00
587
14-3
UI
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
7321
0.00
587
14-3
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
411-9/15
152
0
0
brig.
152
29.22
0.00
198.70
0.00
587
14G
Ul
Madison
4.00
4.00
Fescue Hay
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
71
12.41
0.00
49.63
0.00
587
14G
Ul
Madison
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
16.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
174
0
0
Broad.
174
30.41
0.00
121.64
0.00
587
14G
Ul
Madison
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
911-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
40
6.99
0.00
27.96
0.00
587
15
U2
hewacla-P
8.00
8.00
Small Grain, Silage
*10.0 To
9/1-3/31
*106
0
0
Broad.
53
0.00
12.33
0.00
98.61
587
15
U2
Chewacla-P
8.00
8.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crag
46 bu.
411-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
0.00
41.16
0.00
329.3
587
16
U2
Chewacla-P
5.70
5.70
Small Grain, Silage
*10.0 To
9/1-3/31
*106
0
0
Broad.
53
0.00
12.33
0.00
70.2
587
16
U2
ewacla-P
5.70
5.70
Soybeans, Martured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
0.00
41.16
0.00
234.62
629
1
U2
Cecil
20.20
19.50
Small Gain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-3/31
1I2
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
253.9
629
1
U2
Cecil
20.20
19.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.00
35.35
0.00
6892
630
1
Ul
Cecil
18.40
18.40
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad_
96
16.69
0.00
307.09
0.00
630
1
Ul
Cecil
18.40
18.40
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
38.10
0.00
701.01
0.0
630
1
Ui
Cecil
18.40
18.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
172.04
0.00
630
2
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
178
0
0
Broad.
8
15.55
0.00
80.88
0.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 8 of 18

Waste Utili�,—:a Table "JYear 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
Obs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied I
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field) .
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
630
2
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Corn, Silage
18.4 Ton
2115-6/30
201
0
0
Broad_
201
35.13
UO
192.66
0.00
630
2
Ul
Fil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
911-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
8.56
0.00
44.53
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
13,102,58
Total Produced, I000 gallons
2,797.00
Balance, I000 gallons
-10,305.58
=. =`-
ToUd Applied, tons
<: _; -` -
21,359.2
Total Produced, tons
,ti " -
450.36
Balance, tons
; _,;•._.- _' -
-20,908.90
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 9 of 18

Waste Utilii'n Table JYear 2
Tract
Feld
Source
m
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fem
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field) .
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons -
1397
1
U2
Madison
38.50
38.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
911-3131
92
0
0
Broad.
46
0.00
10.7
0.00
]411.81397
1
U2
Madison
38.50
38.50
Corn, Silage
18A Ton
2/15-6/30
201
0
*20
Broad.
165
0.
38.3
0.00
1
1397
2
U2
Cecil
17.00
17.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
211.51
1397
2
U2
Cecil
17.00
17.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
*20
Broad.
198
0.00
46.05
0.00
782.78
1397
2G
U2
Cecil
I.50
1.50
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
178
0
0
Broad_
178
0.00
41-39
0.00
62.09
1415
1
U2
20.50
19.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
5
0.00
13.03
0.00
257.E
1415
1
U2
Lewacla-P
20.50
19.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
15
0.
35.3
0.00
699.90
1415
2
U2
7.60
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
1 l_05
0.00
80-64
1415
2
U2
ewacla-P
7.60
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
0.00
41.16
0.00
300.48
1416
1
U2
ewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.05
0.00
17.68
1416
1
U2
Chewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
0.00
41.16
0.00
65.8
1416
2
U2
Buncombe
5.40
5.40
Small Grain, Silage
5.0 Tons
911-3/31
56
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
6.51
0.00
35.1
1416
2
U2
Buncombe
5.40
5.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
21 bu.
4/1-9/15
82
0
0
Broad.
82
0.00
19.07
0.00
102.98
1417
1
U2
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
12.91
0.00
58.08
1417
1
U2
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Broad.
179
0.00
41.63
0.00
187.32
1417
2
U2
Cecil
2.70
2.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11.
0.00
30.77
1417
2
U2
Cecil
2-701
2.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
132
0
0
Broad.
132
0.00
30.70
0.00
82.88
1417
3
U2
Congaree
7.20
7.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
12.91
0.00
92.93
1417
3
U2
Congaree
7.20
7.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9/15
179
0
0
Broad.
t79
0.00
4I.63
0.00
299.72
1417
4
U2
hewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3131
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.05
0.00
17.68
1417
4
U2
Chewacla-P
1.60
1.60
1Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
l77
0.00
41.16
0.00
65.8
411
1
U2
Riverview-P
22.70
22.70
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
5
0.00
11.63:::
0.00
263.95
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WLTT Page Page 10 of 18

Waste Utilk a Table JYear 2
Tract
Feld
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Re4d
(lbs/A)
Conan.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field) .
N
N
N
N
1000
SWA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
411
1
U2
Riverview P
22.70
22.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
781.29
411
2
U2Braddock-P
9.10
9.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
58
0.00
13.37
0.00
121.E
411
2
U2
Braddock-P
9.10
9.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
0.00
29.77
0.00
270.88
411
2A
Ul
Riverview-P
16.30
16.30
Fescue Hay
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
200
0
0
Broad.
100
17.48
0.00
284.86
0.00
411
2A
Ul
Riverview-P
16.30
16.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
8.74
0.00
142.43
0.00
411
2A
Ul
Riverview-P
1630
16.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
25.87
0.00
421.60
0.00
411
3
U2
Riverview-P
7.00
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
81.40
411
3 .
U2Riverview-P
7.00
7.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
240.93
411
4
U2
Riverview-P
7.20
6.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3131
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
80.23
411
4
U2
Riverview-P
7.20
6.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34,42
0.00
237A8
411
5
U2
Riverview-P
9.00
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad,
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
104.65
411
5
U2
Riverview-P
9.00
9.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
309.7
411
6
U2
ewaela-P
16.50
16.50
Small Grain, Silage
'9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
•95
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.05
0.00
182.27
411
6
U2
ewacla-P
16-50
16.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
0.00
41.16
0.00
679.18
411
7
U1Braddock-P
3.30
3.00
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
107
18.61
0.00
55.84
0.00
41 l
7
UlBraddock-P
3.30
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
28.05
0.00
411
7
UlBraddock-P
330
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
117
0
0
Broad.
117
20.45
0.00
61.34
0.00
411
8
U2
Riverview-P
1.30
1.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
15.1
411
8
U2
Riverview P
1.30
1.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
44.7
411
9
U2
Riverview-P
8.60
8.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
11.63
0.00
100-00
411
9
U2
Riverview-P
8.60
8.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
296.00
411
9A
Ul
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
1 811-7/31
213
0
1 0
1 Broad.
f 107
18.61
0.00
37.22
0.00
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 11 of 18

Waste Utilk .a Table `:_ -/Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
D)
Soil Series
Taal
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field) .
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
411
9A
Ul
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
18.70
0,00
411
9A
Ul
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
117
0
1 0
Broad.
117
20.45
0.00
40.90
0.00
411
10
Ul
Braddock-P
2.20
2.20
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
107
18.61
0.00
40.95
0.00
411
10
UI
Braddock-P
2.20
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
20.57
0.0
411
10
Ul
Braddock-P
2.20
2.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
117
0
0
Broad.
117
20.45
0.00
44.98
0-00
534
1
U2
Cecil
40.00
38.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
58
0.
13.37
0.00
518.83
534
1
U2
it
40.00
38.80
Com, Silage
1.9 Ton
2/15-&30
239
0
*20
Broad.
21
0.00
50.93
0.00
1,976-06
5842
1
U2
ecil
36.00
35.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
5
0.
13.03
0.00
464.93
5842
1
U2
evil
36.00
35.70
Corn, Silage
1.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
*20
Broad.
211
0.00
49.0
0.00
1,751.7
587
1
U1
Cecil
2.60
2.00
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
204
0
0
Broad.
102
17.83
0.
35.65
0.00
587
1
Ul
it
2.60
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
56
9.79
0.00
19.57
0.00
587
1
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
26.56
0.00
53.13
0.00
587
2
U2
ecil
10.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
Broad.
67
0.00
15.47
0.00
154.65
587
2
U2
ecil
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
5
0.00
13.03
0.00
130.23
587
2
U2
it
10.00
10.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.
35.35
0.00
353.48
587
3
U2
it
22.10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
Broad.
67
0.
15.47
0.00
77.33
587
3
U2
.1
22.10
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
5
0.
13.03
0.00
65.12
587
3
U2
evil
22.10
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.00
35.35
0.00
176.7
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
Broad.
67
0.00
15-47
0.00
46.40
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
39.0
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
I52
0.
35.35
0.00
106.041
587
4-1
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
1 Irrig
67
12,78
0.
63.92
0.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WTI' Page Page 12 of 18

Waste Util� n Table ��. 'Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
OWA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field) -
N
N
N
N
1000
ga1/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons ,
587
4-1
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tan
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
5
I0.77
0.0
53.83
0.00
587
4-1
Ut
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
411-9115
152
0
0
brig.
152
2922
0.00
146.10
0.00
587
4-2
UI
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00.10099
0.00
587
4-2
Ul
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
t0.77
0.00
85.05
0.00
587
4-2
Ul
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
230.84
0.00
587
4-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
66.48
0.00
587
4-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0-00
55.98
0.00
587
4-3
Ui
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu_
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
151.95
0.00
587
4-4
Ul
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
153
0
*20
brig.
67
12.78
0.00
92.04
0.00
587
4-4
U1
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Sntall Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
77.51
0.00
587
4-4
Ul
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
brig.
152
29.22
0.00
210.39
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil:
6.70
6.70
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
hrig.
67
12.78
0.00
85.65
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil
6.70
6.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tan
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
72.13
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil
6.70
6.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
195.78
0.00
587
4-6
UL
Cecil
6.10
6.10
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
Irrig.
67
I2.78
0.00
77.98
0-00
587
4-6
U1
Cecil
6.10
6.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
65.67
0.00
587
46
UI
Cecil
6.10
6.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9115
152
0
0
brig.
152
29.22
0.00
178.25
0-00
587
7
U2
Cecil
16.80
8.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
0
*20
Broad.
62
0.00
14.30
0.00
123.00
587
7
U2
Cecil
16.80
8.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
107,00
587
7
U2
Cecil
16.80
8.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33.49
0.00
288.00
587
7-1
Ul
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
*20
h-rig.
62
11.82
0.00
96.95
0.00
587
7-1
Ul
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
I0.29
0_
84.34
0.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 13 of 18

Waste Util'K_ jn Table �. ) Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Satz Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYF
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
({bslA)
Corrun.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
lies.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(ibs/A)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field) -
N
N
N
N
1000
gai/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons .
587
7-1
Ul
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
brig.
132
25.38
0.00
208.08
0.00
587
8
U2
Cecil
38.00
15.80
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31.
143
0
*20
Broad.
62
0.00
14.30
0.00
225.98
587
8
U2
Cecil
38.00
15.80
Small Gain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
196.58
587
8
U2
Cecil
38.00
15.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0,00
33-49
0.00
529.11
587
8-1
Ul
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
153
0
*20
Irrig_
67
12.78
0.00
79.26
0.00
587
8-1
Ul
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
66.75
0.00
587
8-1
Ul
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu_
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig_
152
29.22
0.00
181.17
0.00
587
8-2
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
*20
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
86.93
0.00
587
8-2
Ul,
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/I-3/31
1I2
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
73.21
0.
587
8-2
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0.00
198.70
0.00
587
8-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
153
0
*20
Irrig.
67
12.78
0.00
66.48
0.00
587
8-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
55.98
0.00
587
8-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
752
0
Irrig.
152
24.22
0.00
151.95
0.00
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
J*20
Broad.
62
0.00
14.30
0.00
115.85
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Small Gain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
100.78
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33.49
0.00
271.25
587
9-1
UI
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
*20
Irrig_
62
11.82
0.00
95.76
0.00
587
9-1
U1
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
54
10.29
0.00
83.31
0.00
587
9-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9115
144
0
0
brig.
144
27.68
0.00
224.23
0.00
587
9-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
*20
Inig.
62
11.82
0.00
86.31
0.0
587
9-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
54
10.29
0.00
75.08
0.00
587
9 Z
UlCecil
7.30
7.30
1Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9115
144
0
0
Irrig.
144
27.68
0.
202.08
0.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 14 of 18

Waste Util% n Table %Year 2 /
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
AYE
Applre,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
R,4d
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(ibs/A)
Res.
pbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
Obs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
{acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field) .
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
587
9-3
U1
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
*20
brig_
62
11.82
0.
80.39
0.00
587
9-3
U1
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
54
10.29
0.00
69.94
0.00
587
9-3
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
brig.
144
27.68
0.00
188.24
0.00
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
133
0
*20
Broad.
57
0.00
13.14
0.00
78.94
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11.40
0.00
68.37
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9115
132
0
0
Broad_
132
0.00
30.70
0.00
184.18
587
10
U2
Congaree
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
811-7/31
166
0
*20
Broad.
73
0.00
I6.98
0.00
33.9
587
10
U2
Congaree
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
I2.91
0.00
25.82
587
10
U2
garee
2.00
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Broad.
179
0.00
41.63
0.00
83.25
587
11
U2
Cecil
75.00
10.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad_
54
0.00
12.44
0.00
130.64
587
11
U2
Cecil
75.00
10.50
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6130
218
0
*20
Broad.
198
0.00
46.05
0.00
483.48
587
11-1
Ul
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
32.30
0.00
587
11-1
U1
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
15
Irrig.
216
41.52
0.00
124.57
0.00
587
11-2
U1
Cecil
2.60
2.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
27.99
0.00
587
11-2
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.60
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
15
Irrig.
21
41.52
0.00
107.96
0.00
587
11-3
U1
Cecil
610
6.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
5
10.77
0.0
66.75
0.00
587
11-3
Ul
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6130
231
0
15
brig.
216
41.52
0.00
257A5
0.
587
11-4
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
78.59
0.00
587
11-4
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-/30
231
0
15
Irrig.
216
41.52
0.00
303.12
0.00
587
11-5
Ul
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
69.98
0.00
587
It-5
UI
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Corn, Silage
1.2 Tan
2/15-00
231
0
15
brig.
21
41.52
0.00
269.90
0.00
587
11- 6
Ul
it
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tan
9/I-3/31
1 112
0
0
brig.
5
10.77
0.00
78.59
0.00
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WTJT Page Page 15 of 18

Waste Utilk A Table t.. )Year 2
Tract
Feld
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pphed
(1bs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
{Feld)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Feld) -
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons -
587
11- 6
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
15
Irrig.
216
41.52
0.00
303.12
0.0
587
11- 7
Ui
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0-00
78.59
0.00
587
11- 7
UI
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6130
231
0
15
Irrig.
216
41.52
0.00
303.12
0.00
587
11- 8
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
911-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
8710
0.00
587
11- 8
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Com, Silage
212 Ton
2J15-6/30
231
0
15
hrig.
216
41.52
0.00
336.34
0.00
587
11- 9
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.0
87.20
0.00
587
11- 9
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6/30
231
0
15
brig.
216
41.52
0.00
336.34
0.0
587
11-10
Ul
Cecil
810
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/3I
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
87.20
0.00
587
11-10
Ul.
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Com, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6/30
231
0
15
Irrig.
216
41.52
0.00
336.34
0.00
587
1IG
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
191
0
0
Broad.
96
16.69
0.00
83.45
0.00
587
1IG
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad_
54
9.35
0.00
46.75
0.00
587
1 iG
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
25.17
0.00
125.83
0-00
587
12
UI
Cecil
2.90
2.90
Fescue Hay
4.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
218
0
0
Broad.
109
19.05
0.00
55.24
0.00
587
12
U1
ecil
2.90
2.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Ton
911-3131
120
0
0
Broad.
10.49
0.00
30.41
0.00
587
12
Ul
.1
2.90
2.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
41 bu.
4/1-9/15
159
0
0
Broad.
15
27.79
0.
80.58
0.00
587
13
U2
1
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
58
0.00
13.37
0.00
26.75
587
13
U2
.1
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
1.9 Ton
2Ji5-6/30
239
0
•20
Broad.
21
0.00
50.93
0.00
101.8
587
14
U2
.1
24.50
2.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
5
0.00
13.03
0.00
29.96
587
14
U2
Cecil
2450
2.30
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6/30
231
0
*20
Broad.
211
0.00
49.07
0.00
112.86
587
14-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
56
10.77
0.00
87.20
0.00
587
14-1
Ul
eciI
8.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
205.6/30
231
0
15
Irrig.
216
41.52
0.00
336.34
0.00
587
142
Ul
ecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage
101 Ton
911-3131
112
0
0
hrig.
56
78.59
0.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 16 of 18

Waste Utili 111 Table )Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic-
mod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
FerL
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
AppUc.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplicd
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gWA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
587
14-2
U1
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Cam, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
15
Irrig.
216
41.52
0-00
303.12
0.00
587
14-3
U1
Cecil
&80
6.80
Small Crain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
56
10.77
0.00
73.21
0.00
587
14-3
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Com, Silage
1.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
15
1 brig.
216
41.52
0.00
292.36
0.0
587
14G
U1
Madison
4.001
4.00
Fescue Hay
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
71
12.41
0-00
49.63
0-00
587
14G
Ul
Madison
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
40
6.99
0.00
27.96
0.00
587
14G
Ul
Madison
4.00
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
411-9/15
105
0
0
Broad.
105
18.35
0.00
73.40
0.00
587
15
U2
Chewacla-P
8.00
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
*10.0 To
9/1-3/31
*106
0
0
1 Broad.
1 53
0.001
12.33
0.001
98.61
587
15
U2
Chewacla-P
8.00
8.00
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
291
0
*20
Broad.
271
0.00
63.02
0.00
504.18
587
16
U2
Chowacla-P
5.70
5.70
Small Grain, Silage
*I0-0 To
9/1-3131
*106
0
0
Broad.
53
0.00
12.33
0.00
70.2
587
16
U2
ewacla-P
5.70
5.70
Com, Silage
29.0 Tan
2/15-6/30
291
0
*20
Broad.
271
0.00
63.02
0.00
359.23
629
1
U2
Cecil
20.20
19.50
Small Garin, Silage
10.1 Tan
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
56
0.00
13.03
0.00
253.95
629
1
U2
Cecil
20.20
19.50
Com, Silage
12 Ton
2/15-6130
231
0
*20
Broad.
211
0.00
49.07
0.00
956.85
630
1
Ul
Cecil
I8.40
18.40
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
96
16.69
0-00
307.09
0.00
630
1
Ul
Cecil
l8.40
18.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
9.35
0.00
172.041
0.00
630
1
Ul
Ce6i
18.40
18.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/I5
144
0
0
Broad.
144
25.17
0.00
463.05
0.00
630
2
Ul
Cecil
520
510
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
178
0
0
Broad.
89
15.55
0.00
80.88
0.00
630
2
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grainy Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
8.56
0.
44.53
0.00
630
2
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
1Soybearts, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
132
0
0
Broad.
132
23.07
0.00
119.96
0.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 17 of 18

Waste WILL,n Table
Aear 2
Tract
Feld
Source
ID
Sail Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res_
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Uquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons -
Total Applied,1000 gallons
12,065.71Tow
produced, Produced, lo0o gallons
2,797.00s
Balance, lo00 gallons
-9.268.71
Total Applied, tons
20,572.0
Total Produced, tons
450.3
Balance, tons
:.::`- _
-20,121.68
Notes: 1. In the tract coltunn, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 WUT Page Page 18 of 18

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
- 1 are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
1
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1397
1
38.50
38.50
15.0
Madison
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
1397
2
17.00
17.00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
1397
20
1.50
1.50
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
1415
1
20.50
19.80
15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
1415
2
7.60
7.30
9.0
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
1416
1
1.601
1.60
9.0
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
1416
2
5.40
5.40
22.0
Buncombe
Corn, Silage
10.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
5.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
21 bu.
1417
1
4.50
4.50
15.0
Congaree
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
1417
2
2.70
2.70
15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
1417
3
7.201
7.20
15.0
Congaree
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
1417
4
1.60
1.60
9.0
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
09.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCS Page Page 1 of 8
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (Lp
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
411
1
22.70
22.70
15.0
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411
2
9.10
9.10
15.0
Braddock-P
Corn, Silage
15.7 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411
2A
16.30
16.30
15.0
Riverview-P
Fescue Hay
4.5 Tons
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tans
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411
3
7.00
7.00
15.0
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
38 bu.
411
4
7,201
6.90
15.0
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411
5
9.00
9.00
15.0
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411
1 6
16.50
16.50
11.0
Chewacla-P
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411
7
3.30
3.00
15.0
Braddock-P
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
Corn, Silage
14A Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
411
8
1.30
1.30
15.0
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411
9
8.601
8.60
15.0
Riverview-P
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411
9A
2.00
2.00
15.0
Braddock-P
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
Corn, Silage
14.4 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCS Page Page 2 of 8
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
411
10
2.20
2.20
15.0
Braddock-P
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
Corn, Silage
14.4 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
534
1
40.00
38.80
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
5842
1
36.00
35.70
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu,
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
1
2.60
2.O0
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
2
10.00
10.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu,
587
3
22.10
5.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
4
20.20
3.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
4-1
5.00
5.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
4-2
7.90
7.90
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
4-3
5.20
5,20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCs Page Page 3 of 8
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Craps Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
4-4
7.20
7.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
4-5
6.70
6.70
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
4-6
6.10
6.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu,
587
7
16.80
8.60
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
7-I
8.20
8.20
15.0
lCecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Crain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
8
38.00
15.80
15.0 lCecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
8-1
6.20
6.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manureti, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
8-2
6.80
6.80
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Cam, Silage
21.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
8-3
5.20
5.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
Com, Silage
21.2 Tons
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCS Page Page 4 of 8
MOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Small Crain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
587
9
19,00
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Crain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
9-1
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
9-2
7.30
7.30
NIA
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
9-3
6.80
6.80
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
9A
13-001
6.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
Com, Silage
18.4 Tons
Small Gain, Silage
8.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
587
10
2,001
2.00
15.0
Congaree
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
587
11
75.001
10.50
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
587
11- 1
3.00
3.00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
11-2
2.60
2.60
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
11-3 1
6.20
6,20
15.0 ICecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCs Page Page 5 of 8
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
bares
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
11-4
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
11- 5
6.501
6.50
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
I1- 6
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Com, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
11- 7
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
11- 8
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
1 11- 9
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
11-10
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
l lG
5.00
5.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
587
12
2.90
2.90
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.9 Tons
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
41 bu.
587
13
2.00
2.00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
587
14
24.50
2.301
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCs Page Page 6 of 8
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
14-1
8.101
8.10
15.0
lCecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Com, Silage
2I.2 Tons
587
14-2
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu,
Com, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
14-3
6.80
6.80
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
587
14G
4.001
4.00
15.0
Madison
Fescue Hay
3.2 Tons
Com, Silage
16.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
587
15
8.00
8.00
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage
*10.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
587
16
5.70
5.70
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage
*10.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
629
1
20.20
19.50
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
630
1
18.40
18.40
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
630
2
5.20
5,20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
Com, Silage
18.4 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 777.30 603.60
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCS Page Page 7 of 8
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

LI
Dtentd,.. a.
d Leachdng o.'
:: Technical Guuittitce
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
x 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004
PCS Page Page 8 of 8
NOTES Symbol * means user entered data.

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. if
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
587
4-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-4
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-5
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-6
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
7-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
8-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
8-2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
8-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
9-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
9-2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
9-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 4
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 5
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 6
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 7
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 8
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 9
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11-10
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587 1
14-1
jCecil
0.40
1 1.0
587
14-2
ICecil
0.40
1.0
587 1
14-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/21/2004 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
} at the end of each month of the plan, Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
TC Williams Dairy Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
7/1
I80
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
150
1
5
119
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
1
9
88
1
10
180
1
11
150
1
12
119
2
1
88
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
150
2
5
119
2
b
180
2
7
149
2
8
118
2
9
88
2
10
I80
2
11
150
2
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------ ------------ - ------ ---- - ----------------------- ------ ----- ------------- ------
1447I 1 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-21-2004 Capacity Page Page 1 -of-I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
} -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 Specification Page I

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
------------------------------------------------- ------_------------._-..__------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 10/21/2004 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are Iimited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
144711 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/21/2004 Specification Page 3

1 C:. W
err D-s
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: r 3 ''
1,oni Slab �ARD N Se. �QA.u�ie�.. llfoD 3� �G Aloe N el anj P /SZ & ,o J.Z6
Field Not
and
Hydrant Nv2
Travel
Speed
(Nmin)
Application
Rate
(i.Jler)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (ft) !.m (ft)
Wetted
Diameter
(Ceet)
EQUIPMENT SETTINOS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(inches Gun (psi) @ Reel i) Pattem3
£ lie -A",
c1144
-
. is
J. fry I
gqqif
'
1.7-6
Bo
1
:5
S. ! Z-
y- z
szr
31.,Q '
1.240
0
12-0
Boo
93
4- 3.
s,,S-
a L40
99-0'
3 '
Zo
300
s.a
4-
s is
ayo'
1308'
300'
1.Z
so
Ixt>
3o0
• z
-r
a 91D,
/dlk'
360rI
.i
IaD
300
A
3 '
I.a•�
It
1ao
300
- I
S:
a RE
la 38
34,6'
. 2.10
S D
12-0
.300
8,
8-
S,aS
a'V
/a-r'
- 3L'01 -
1-7-4
1 LO
3 0o
• z
-2
aq&f1238
0
/.
$0
12.0
300
z
3
y'
$S8'
360'
.Ato
so
1 �
30D
�.
q-
d
3d8'
3 60'
D
3a0
09-Z
P,'�,2Y
3 8'
3
,d b
D
do
300
3 L-
3
I /ag'
3 bo'
,�
0
00
(„ 8
!2
kV,
18`
3'
1, A,
to
IR 0
3 4o
4 a Z-
12 9to'
j`
3tob,
b z
11- 3,
E,aa
q
aYO1
l/Ag"
3W
I.Z
o
d 0
300
1-L1
S is
A4Y0'
IJAI
3(00/
1.2.10
go
IdO
3D8
3 2
11-5
, zs
aG
/,*&8'
3bo'
1.div
go
I /a0
30v
(C),
- (r
S• s.�
. �/
9 PC `
!3X'
3 0'
1 1,40
8O
I /d D
3 oa
2 3 z.
I See attached map.
2Show separale entries for each hydrnut location in each field.
3Usc the following abbreviations for various are patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
MRCS, NC
NNE, 1996
ri

EXHIBIT D-2
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make Model and Type of Equipment: r �
LawQ S #9� a e= ! Rowel x 3 SD 6,sr. CIS 0"1 ' ab '
Field Not
and
I1 drant Not
Travel
Speed
(Wmin)
Application
Rate
iwhr)
TRAVEL LANE
Elfective Effective
Width R) h (A)
Wetted
Diameter
(feel)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating operating��_-f;
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arch
(inches) @ Gun (psi) @ Reel i Pattern;
G b
I1-7
S. xsIq
d
-XV
3 '
1. a�
Sb
2- b
300
, 3 Z
1-8
,S-Is-
q
d bq '
3a.$1,
3 '
1.24
re
12-0
3 o
3. 05-
S,1S'
•1
it to V,
13otgf
3 O
. Z
S'D
I2-0
300
&, O r'
'^
s i ol?
. 1 1�.
'
tW
'h24tl
2-0
D
91 0's-
-
A
)3ag'
3(,P'
.�
80
.10
300
,O S
S;a-Z
o't VO'
)3d8'
3 60-
go
ldd0
500
3 Z
5;d3-
y'
1/ad
3(00'
I See attached snap.
2Show separate entries for each hydrant localion in each field.
3Use lllc following abbreviations for variotis are paltents: r (fill circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), Ii (half circle), T (one third), Q (one gmarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
NRCS, NC
)UNE, 1996

TC
J
TABLE 4 -irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
3 IS.trp
aerating Pressure at Pump (psi)
NA Ps
Design Precipitation Rate (in/hr)
Al
Hose Length (feet)
d i
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
N
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
O
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
6S B HP
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
Deslpner mov nrovlde thrust block details on separate sheet.
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.)
900 Bend
Dead End
Tee
See USDA-NRCS Field Office "rechnicai
Guide. Section LV- Practice Code 430-131).
EXHOrr DA
NRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

BIG GUN° PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY*
)10 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
"S'
'SS"
.6"
'65,
.7"
.75'
A"
.05'
.9"
1.0"
P.S.I.
GPM plq.
.GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM pIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
40'
1 ia
r ,
130 265'
150 273'
165 280"
50
50 205'
64 215'
74 225"
87 235'
100 245`
115 256'
204 300'
70
60 225'
75 236'
88 250'
103 263'
120 2T5'
136 283'
155 295
177 302'
197 310'
243 338'
90
60 245'
83 258' 1
100 270' 1
117 283'
135 295
155 306'
175 315'
201 326'
223 335'
274 362'
i►316'_'�165"
325»
�212 �33$
235 c"s345:
.2f1 372r
110
76 265`
92 27B'
111 290'
129 303'
150 315'
171 324'
195 335'
222 344'
247 355'
304 380'
-AV8118131e only with r1D0 a sHiuo.
100 R RING NOZZLES
100 DN DIFFUSER NOZZLES
PSI
.71 RING
GPM DIA
.77 RING
GPM DIA
.at RING
GPM DIA
.86 RING
GPM DIA
.89 RING
GPM DIA
.93 RING
GPM DIA
.96 RING
I GPM DiA
0,5 DN
GPM DIA
0.6 DN
GPM DiA
0.7 DN
GPM DIA
0.8 DN
I GPM DIA
40
060
60
a1�' 7D
80
i�3 90
140
66 208
78 212
91 215
,.
Z672W0=
66 160
a zs t
=WZQW=
91 182
i)0 1scM,
110 200
D0=8
118 196
iWp.
143 216
103 224
118 235
134 238
�6li zs
164 275
;,mK377:.,.2967r-
169 3D5
W]2&Zff
212 325
222x"335^i:.c
152 242
,1sixas4
1B3 280
.
211 315
M 3. 4-
236 335
3,s.c24B%.345 +
45 154
E6D`"�1�34
B1 235
96 240
110 245
125 260
=39m'.
141 270
1M2w Dom'
163 300
V3 i10sx.4
182 32D
.x1flI 325
1 94 255
105 27D
1f1 265
�7
124 2BD
8
127 275
142 295
'Wi=
145 265
E'�"��= M
�. ...
,,: �_.: ' '
S' '.. 'a.,. -•.^•
162 3D5
...
Y-' _ a
oNN�uw air V'iu.�ab� iui ui uPIe6�V�Y i���}t�tl, G� itlbS �V� �G".
150 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
P.S.I.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
60
11D 265'
143 285'
182 305'
225 325'
275 345'
330 365'
385 380,
a�w' �
�.
- � - . .
80
128 290,
165 310'
210 335'
260 355'
315 375'
380 395'
445 410'
100
143 310'
185 330'
1 235 355'
1 290 375'
355 400'
425 420'
Soo 440'
� 5
�8_420'
)720
157 330'
20a 350'
258 375'
32D 395'
385542D'
4648 5 440•
Say 460'
150 R RING NOZZLES
Rln�
86
GPM DIA.
Ring
B7"
GPM DIA.
Rlnq
1.06
GPM DiA.
Ring
1.18"
GPM DIA.
Rin�
1,26
GPM DIA.
Ring
1.34"
GPM DIA.
Ring
1.41'
GPM DIA.
080
110 2601'
14328o'
182 30D'
vilarl
ilaw
us.
225 315'
M.
275 335'
33D 35D'
385 365'
128 280'
465 300'210
320'
260 340'
315 360'
360 380'
445 395'
mm� pill
143 300'
185 320'
235 340'
1 290 360,
355 380'
425 400'
500 415'
120
157 313'
204 335'
258 390'
320 380,
385 400'
465 420'
545 435'
'The diameter of throw is approximately Job less for the 91" tralectary angle
200 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 270 TRAJECTORY"
7f1n T TAPFR RORF N077LFS
A.S.I.
Nozzle
1.05"
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
1.1"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.2'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
12,
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.4"
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
1.5"
GPM DiA.
Nozzle
1.6"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.75"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.9"
GPM DIA.
298-0
S-2aZT60
70
270 380'
310 380,
355 395'
415 410'
480 430'
555 450'
+-§6 X7a ,
630 465'
X Z- $ „4 .°"
755 495'
BOASa�`..Z-
890 515'
L9$6M5i5'w�"'
.,I5 45
90
310 390'
350 410'
405 425'
475 445'
545 465'
625 485'
715 505,
855 535'
"f SSD,,,,u
10D5 555'
1064, 57`x: a
110
34D 410'
390 430"
445 450'
405 465'
S25 470
"w" 490?
565 485'
605 495'
$eD DBa.e
1 655 515'
695 515'
7iS ai::S3D
755 540'
790 535'
't$ $0
B60 560'
945 565'
8 �$C.4rII
1025 590'
1110 590'
166 �05it
1210 620'
130
370 425'
425 445'
200 R RING NOZZLES
1 1/4" Ring
1 W Ring
1 /2' Ring
1 5A" Ring
113141 Ring
1 "/p' Ring
2' Ring
(1,29' actuall
M.
(1.46" actual}
(1S6" actual)
(1.66" actual]
(1.74" actual)
(1.83" actueli
(1.93" actual)
P.S.I.
GPM
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA,
GPM DIA..
GPM DIA,
GPM DIA.
61
250 340'
330 370'
385 390,
445 410'
S15 425'
586 440'
695 455'
Oj ad"
'%0A,7&42*5=
L"r: 555 ". 44d
:a.rlf5 455�.kr
76�u' d7
80
290 370'
380 400'
445 4213'
515 440'
590 455
675 470'
B05 490'
" 00
325 390'
425 425'
500 445'
Je
575 465'
"''?'$05=;�435T
IH
660 480'
,1s' i .693 fir' 4BU..,
755 500'
':' ,7B0 $.1 b� ,..a�
F
900 520,
' Q,,.945?; �-'-5351._-
t a. xw,i.�'
�1'20
355 410'
465 445'
545 465'
630 485'
725 500,
825 520'
985 545'
67;
.""gym 6 *R 4?„. ..
, � 865'n'>r'yr4gD{ �mr
7W755 .., '='505'".r
7T-8667�?"J!: 626=
•^; 10t 6177 550r' "'
+. 3
'The diameler or throw Is approximately Z46 less for the 24" trajectory angle, bob less for the z1" iraleciory angle.
The BIG GUNS performance dale has been obtained under ideal test conditions and may be adversely affected Dy wind, poor hydraulic entrance conditions or other taclers.
Nelson irrigation Corporation makes no representation regarding droplet condition, uniformity, or appticalion rate.

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific P_ ractices
Farmstead • Dairy production 51 Vegetative or wooded buffers
Cf Recommended best management practices
Lf Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered 61 Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces I( Promote drying with proper ventilation
Li Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine 0 Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial T( Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks Partial microbial 0 Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial 0 Bottom or mid -level loading
basin'surface decomposition 0 Tank covers
• Mixing while filling T( Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying l( Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
Rf Agitate only prior to manure removal
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial 0 Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition 0 Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader • Volatile gas emissions 54 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets W Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page i

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor _ _ _ Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Sod injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
Cf
,Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
i(
Proven biolo "cal additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are fi1lmg
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tan_ k covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
• Agitation during wastewater
❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emission
❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation
0 Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
• High pressure agitation
if Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles
'Wind drift
Lf Minimum recommended operating procedure
Nr Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
0 Pump from second -stage lagoon
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause I BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition 9 Of Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water • Improper drainage if Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory, EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3

Insed Cw" Cheddid for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMWs to Control Insects Site S ecific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
l� Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal f5 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minim� accumulations of wastes
(ie., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handing . Accumulations of animal IN Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
!� Provide for adequate drainage around manure
Itockpiles
nspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Insect CwW Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Uauid Svstems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids 7 Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
_ 0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits Crusted solids O Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative . Decaying vegetation Off Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders • Feed spillage M Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
/accumulation of decaying wastage
0 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Mortality -Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
l�J Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledgpe of -the death. The burial must -be at -least 309 feet from -any -#lowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licenserl under jG,.S. 1-06,168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
1 apyroved by thel3eparrunew_of Agriculture
�1 Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make pgAsible -the -salvage _of -part .jof-a-Azad animal's wdw without-zndanger-ing
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

v
CATEGORY
EXAMPLES
ACTION
CONTACTS
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff — 704-878-3180
full or partial loss of a Waste
property, contact 911 or Sheriff's Dept.
Storage Pond wall resulting in a
release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
{DWQ} - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-878-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
5353
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor — Church Brothers
Grading
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
Statesville, NC 28625
contain the waste on the farm
704-876-1615
704-876-4744
4. Contact the technical specialist who
Tech. Spec, — 704-873-6761, east. 3
certified the Waste Storage Pond
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or After Hours Emergency at 919-733-
from base or sidewalls of Waste
3942
Storage Pond; waste discharging
from underground tiles
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
Local Contractor —Church Brothers
these may result in complete
technical specialist can assess situation
Grading
structural failure
704-876-1615
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat" category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single storm events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker

Waste Storage Overflow
* Add soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam
* Pump wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate
* Stop all additional flow to the
lagoon (waterers)
* Call a pumping contractor
* Make sure no surface water
is entering lagoon
Runoff From Waste
Application Field
Immediately stop waste
application
* Create a temporary diversion
or berm to contain the waste
on the field
* Incorporate waste to reduce
further runoff
Leakage From Waste
Distribution System
* Stop recycle (flushing
system) pump
* Stop irrigation pump
* Close valves to eliminate
further discharge
* Separate pipes to create an
air gap and stop flow
Leakage From Base or
Sidewall of Storage Pond
* Dig a small well or ditch to
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
back into Waste Storage Pond
* If holes are caused by
burrowing animals, trap or
remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type
soil
* Other holes may be likewise
temporarily plugged with clay
soil

'tic 1'0�
V.
ARR
yr
cv-
544
04*': :',z
I
Farm Site Map
T. C. Williams Farm 111c.
Facility No. 49-17
0

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. S., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 10, 2004
T.C. Williams
T.0 Williams Farm
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689-9205
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490017
T.0 Williams Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Uredell County
Dear T.C. Williams:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
To correct the facility's animal capacity and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are
hereby forwarding to you this corrected Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T.C. Williams,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application
= system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the T.0 Williams Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy Cows, 85 Calves, 80 Heifers, 35 Dry Cows, and the
application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW?4P).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void the
COC dated October 1, 2004, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. Ali
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase iri'waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pgy careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
_1 inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
._J
1V_ �00"' arolina
�vatura!!�
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

I
f 1
r Tract d Field
I r I l
•^Maps
II +'
r quit l;f I.r tr f
I
TY
r I
hr
r '� fit. r, ,.! -� .� ��.::..".'Y�•��, I Ir` � � I,i 1 f.. P Y }:l '' t f 'f.:• ri ��' t y' t� � .``\ f --:1 r y!,1 it , r! rl>.!LCi :� ri �! { ft'1p�1 Irl.
r r �i d 12
i
r�,lgggI���ai I� Il1lrrr�.il r j�Yr /� !,I 8.9 If t 4 w�� i k I a ICI
r(!� �'u ..I r I i ' �"�irIIp7�i IN 11 { it ! 1 #a. "�'r Yl 1 1 C { y r 1 Ij�•I aJ 1
I
f t l rX �ri r 9 I. l th ) ri r
j t, fl i'; 1TI rli
- .:� •�\Id f I lift r r I "SI + ., i t, i I 'T l,�il ,IEII rl { rF i r1
s IIVI 's I r ,
i
��Y r Y ti' Frl ..i
JOI
,. , ..
1 {'
,r
oz
Ir µ
r,P•—;.I10 •'3r�mr xYj" ' '1' �`ry". 9ry��ie"�°'p�.avt lr �� ljt,:'j •r:"s

14
W Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ®- O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: AD Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other () Denied Access
Date of Visit: .'t t Arrival Time: eparture Time: O ounty: _� Region: k' b
Farm Name: �� C—� �11�I��1}1�1�Cz Owner Email:
Owner Name: dlt-�-- �-- •yy I Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: A1 �-e- L
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
other
Title:
Latitude:
•
Phone:
Integrator: IQ
Certification Number: a4 l 6
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
ELayer
Non -Layer
D
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharzes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity r Pop.
n�
❑ YeNsEl^No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ N A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Yes � o NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
I
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1?Lh
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ��o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application -
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes,)L!jWo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes P10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind�rift[]Application Outsia of Approved Area
I2. Crop Type(s): Co` S�
Gj
13. Soil Type(s): �7 P'�—a�
e
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yesto— ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes h o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E!14ro A
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑Yes
o [3NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ecklists 0 Design Maps ease Agreements Other-
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
PVaste Applicati'kly Freeboard Waste Analysis alysis aste Transfers ea er Code
infal Stockin Crop Yield 0 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 0_SIuge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No -la- ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

'acill Number: - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ NA
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec ❑ Yes [] No, NA
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead a ' als with 24 hours and/or document Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were highe anr��norml al? �— s
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emeE&ency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over- app tcation)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes' ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yesb��_t
fo L❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
07/, � /I
D�ZL.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Division of Water Quality
Falciiity Number-'----J 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: i 3 Arrival Time: Departure Time: 2;ges County: Region: w 1�CJ
Farm NameOwner Email:
Owner Name: C� le \� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: q
Certified Operator: CYL� to �U Certification Number: �� l
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other
Other
Certification Number;
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop.. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
N
Other
Poults
Design Current
Longitude:
Design Curre t
Cattle Capacity Pop..
RE M -
--'
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �oA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [] No
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑NoM'�4PE
/ ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye`o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
a
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

km
Facili Number: JDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4/Is'storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
/ a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:—
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
— L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1b;o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes T ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 15;hfo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes <?=_rgo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes ' to ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, zn, et .
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside off,Zro,
ed Area
12. Crop Type(s):CS4 J t^PlVC t ��'9 J
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes'J;Q�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes Jddo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes�ELNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o❑
NA
❑ NE18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yeso
r
❑ NA
❑ NE'
Reaulred Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Ce_ to of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[] Yes No
❑ NA
[] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ecklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
2I . Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the propriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Vaste Application Weekly Freeboard rite Analysis Soil Analysis t ransfers Q Weather Code
�ainfall 6�" op Yield [D,1W Minute Inspections onthly and V Rainfall Inspections��Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No�lA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

1N acili Number: - Date of Inspection:
r 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec Yes [::]No A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structurc(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 'f34io
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
Other Issues
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of qaLanimals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher final?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergecy situations as required by the
❑ Yes'127o
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard probl , oveovr-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes Wo
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes M
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes TEgjo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
o t97 $
� o
�.. `�✓b� c7 aw Cam.*11'A
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

0 Division of Water Quality 9Facility Number �� O Division of Soil and Water Conservation F&�=tl0 Other Agency —ji
Type of Visit * Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit # Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: :t+i 12 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: �' ; A Owner Email:
Owner Name: GVV�'L�- l� t W1� S Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Region: Milzb
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
e t� LOAk Operator Certification Number: Certified Operator:W t l 21
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = ' = Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ ' ❑ u
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Opacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity PPRulation
Cow
1
airy Calf
C7
Heifer
PONon-Dairy
aw
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yese)!JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoZaA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yep:Co
NA El NE
[I Ye [INA ❑ NE
12/2"4 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o El NA El NE
N
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ' 1QA ❑ NE
truc re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �, fi6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes '� V ElNA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes �'v ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence o Wind D)rifi 0 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C_X'V"' ('s\
13. Soil type(s) oo y W
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes �
❑ NA
❑ NE.
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes '�o
El NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes_NQ�fib
0 NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 12?1vo
[] NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawingsoffacility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�_7/ 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes �10 [I NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes{ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. Checklists ❑ Design Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Application eeldy Freeboard Waste Analysis oil Analysis ante Transfers nnual Certification
Rainfall Stocking rap Yield _[�<20 Minute Inspections EllZrithly and 1" Rain Inspections JJ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No�TA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pennit? a6 ❑ Yes ❑ No WA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes CgW ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ Noi4A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes,'RKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes �o El NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were hig er 'thannormal?
mal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
,12128104

Facility Number b
*Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water
O Other Agency
(Type of Visit 4D Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O T—e—cff ff WAssilstance
Reason for Visit 46 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Depa'rt�uAre Time: �:$S County: �.v�:_'Region:
pv`1L"
Farm Name: —_ C, i �+�1 �`c �-t_._. Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _
-- —._-- Phone: _—_---.
Title: _
Onsite Representative: _
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
10 Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:.-
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c a L = Longitude: a ° = i =
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er I e
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Cl Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pouets
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
'r
Design Current
Cattle Capacity P ulation
2
l Oiry
r
V
ry
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ISo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No EWA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
❑ Y No El NA El NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
�O
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 'Z h
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes min ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No kA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
❑ Yeso
[I NA [I NE
El NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes1< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes '450 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Ki4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of (Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type (s)
13. Soil type(s)"`^- W
i
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP7
El Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Ye
No
El NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination r ❑ Ye o
El
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElYes
El NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
10 17/ Ic
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes V ❑ NA ❑ NE
the approprrate box. ther v
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate
,bbooxx below. ❑ Yes �-O_Ar
❑ NA ❑ NE
,,�� Waste Application I�Jee[tly Freebaar aste Analysis-IT'Soil Analysis Waste Transfersnual Certification
-0- ainfall PKiocking. EKrop Yield E1110 Minute Inspections ontl>ly and I" Rain Inspections Q Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No )�MA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dQULaaimaJ§ within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the 'inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, aver application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ YesZ�No El NA ❑ NE
�
❑ Yes ❑ N !AfA ❑ NE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No K ❑ NE
❑ Yes gLo
El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes El ElNE
❑ Yes-�< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ElNA ElNE
❑ Yes t ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

0w
N Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Egutine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 06/28/2010 Entry Time:0210 PM Exit Time: 03:30 PM
Farm Name: T C. Williams Farm. Inc
Owner: Thomas C Williams
Incident M.
P .iI"'M41MIM IF
1:0—MT-3KIL•�YkI�
Mailing Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop Union -Grove NC 2868 205
Physical Address: 139 Burke Farm Loon Union Grgve N Z,86899205_
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 36°01'28" Longitude: 81 °00'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1698), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on Burke Rd. Farm
is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams Operator Certification Number: 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s). Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext,2162
Inspector Signature: Date:c�
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
03/31/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10122/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.5 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/27/10 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in July, 2010,
Silage Leachate must be controlled following BMPs to prevent potential discharge. Facility Operator is currently in the process of
coordinating with Iredell SWCD/MRCS to develop and implement a plan to address; work to be completed by September, 2010.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Data: 06t28l2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Cattle
Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle - Dairy Calf
85
40
O Cattle - Dairy Heifer
80
25
Cattle -Dry Cow
35
20
Q Cattle - Milk Cow
200
450
Total Design Capacity: 400
Total SSLW: 438,750
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
WSP
24.00
48M
Page: 2

Permit: AVVC490017 Owner- Facility; Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06128/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes .No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ Cl Cl
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
Cl
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6, Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
Cl
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/28/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/oI10 lbs.?
0
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
rl
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop T e 1
Com (Silage)
yp
Crop Type 2
Fescue
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
i]
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
16. Did the facility tail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Q
■ ❑
Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
Q
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
■ ❑
Q
20. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the CAWMP readily available?
11
■ 13
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Facility Number: 490017
inspection Date: 06/28/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
In
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those Cl ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 5

Permit AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/28/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA N
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
33. Does racility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

i
N Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredeli Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 11/1812C09 Entry Time: 01130 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM
Farm Name: T.0 Williams Farm, Inc.
Owner: Thomas C Williams
Incident M,
Owner Email;
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 139 Burke Farm Loon Union Grove NC 286899205
Physical Address: 139 Burke Farm L990 Union Grove NC 286899205
Facility Status: 0 Compliant
Location of Farm:
Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: 36'01'28" Longitude: 81 °00'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on Burke Rd. Farm
is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams Operator Certification Number: 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
Primary inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
10/22/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons
07/09/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.4 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/15/09 > Soil Analysis
Silage Leachate must be controlled follovAng BMPs to prevent potential discharge. Facility Operator is currently in the process of
coordinating with iredell SWCD/NRCS to develop and implement a plan to address.
IS
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 11118/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Dairy Calf
85
85
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
80
160
Cattle - Dry Cow
35
30
Cadle -Milk Cow
200
160
Total Design Capacity: 400
Total SSLW: 438,750
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 24.00 48.00
Page: 2

f
j
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C 'Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 11118/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. !s any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c, Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
❑
■ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
Cl
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
Cl
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Cl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e / large trees, severe
Cl
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
Cl
❑
dry statics and/or wet stacks)
9, Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Cl
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 11/18/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA Ni_
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? 0
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? Q
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Soybean. Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Q ■
Q
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Cl ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

I
Permit: AWC490017 Owner- Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 11/18/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? 0
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
2& Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
11
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those Cl ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

r
Permit: AWC490017 - Owner -Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Numbs- 490017
Inspection Date: 11/18/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? Q M ❑ ❑
33. Dces facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■0C1
Page: 6

e 'N Division of Water Quality
jn Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 06/20/2008 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM
Farm Name: T.C. Williams Firm. loc.
Owner: ThoMas G Williams
Physical Address:
FacilityStatus: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Fans:
Integrator:
Incident M
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Latitude:36°01'28" Longitude:81°00'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on Burke Rd. Farm
is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Otherlssues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams Operator Certification Number: 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
E 2162
Inspector Signature: Date: �qm-'xa
Secondary tnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
04/07/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.4 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/08/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.3 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/31/08 > Soil Analysis
Silage Leachate must be controlled following BMPs to prevent potential discharge. Facility Operator is currently in the process of
coordinating with Iredell SWCD/NRCS to develop and implement a plan to address.
jb
Page: 1

w
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility! Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for �isit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
85
20
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
80
60
Q Cattle - Dry Cow
35
30
Q Cattle -Milk Cow
200
195
Total Design Capacity: 400
Total SSLW: 438,750
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 24,00 27.00
Page: 2

�. Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Wlliams
Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
❑
■
n
2. Is there. evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
[1
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
[I
■
Q
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
0
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q ■ n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 ■ ❑ El
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ 0 0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Q N n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ 0 Q
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n D Q
20. noes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n Q D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Cate: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ [i
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWG490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
n■pn
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

United States Department of Agriculture
4.j N RCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
June 19, 2008
Jim Propst, District Conservationist
Phone: [phone] ext. 3
jini
Dear Mr. Bealle, NC DENR Mpo
gDaniels(Dames '' V p �Ii+�.J�
I am enclosing documents for Aileen Daniels/Sam Daniels (Dames a� s
Williams (Charlie Williams Dairy).
The Daniels information documents the closure, all forms are signed from my end, Ms. Daniels
needs to send you the original signed copy.
Charlie Williams has a design for the leachate control. We are working on the conservation plan,
and also in the process of updating his waste application plan to handle the leachate. I have
enclosed summary sheets of the design package, our office has more detailed specifications if
you would require that; let me know. The Williams plan will be a Fall plan if that is permissible
in order to be able to get back within proper seeding dates and hopefully obtain more soil
moisture for stability of the structures.
Sincerely,
T
m s
Propst
USDA-NRCS District Conservationist
Iredell FO
Helping People Help the Land
An Equal Qpportunity provider and Employer
q�x+s"

0 NRCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
121 Laurel drive
Rutherfordton, NYC 28139
DATE: May 22, 2008
United States Department of Agricaltu ""'Oh E C E- IVE D
l<
SUBJECT: Charlie Williams Dairy
Waste Management System
FILE CODE: 210
TO: Jim Propst, District Conservationist
Statesville, NC
J U N 2 0 2008
NC DENR MRO
M-Surface Water Protection
A final design of silo leachate control system is attached for the Charlie Williams Dairy. Please
document that cultural resources review has been completed.
A cost estimate was prepared based on EQIP incentive cost list. This should give some
indication of cost. The cost share would be either 50% or 75% of cost shown, depending on the
item.
Considering the possible cost of installing power to pump pit, this alternative is similar cost to
constructing another waste storage pond. The storage period should still be 180 days in waste
storage pond. The actual storage period before adding silo leachate and runoff was probably 7 or
8 months.
In the estimate, pump cost was based on chopper/agitator pump. If cost share is available, this
may not be the appropriate item to use. The cost will be similar to this cost. The other item
would be about half this cost.
As discussed, I will review alternatives with Charlie Williams when we all have a little more
time Let me know
if you have/any questions.
Samuel C. Bingham 7
Civil Engineer
Enclosures
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer
N

CHARLIE WILLIAMS DAIRY
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION: LOCATED west of HWY 115 on SR
1598. Approx.1.5 miles take left on SR
1599. Farm approx. 800' on left
LONGITUDE - 0800 59' 17.44" W
LATITUDE - 0360 01' 17.73" N
PHONE:
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: Maximum Number Cattle in Waste
Management System
200 MILK COWS
35
DRY COWS
30
Heifers
day
old
TO
200 lbs
30
Heifers
200
lbs
to
400 lbs
25
Heifers
400
lbs
to
600 lbs
80
Heifers
600
lbs
to
1200 lbs
PLANNED BY: Jim Propst, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
Mac Edgerton, Civil Engineer Technician
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
APPROVED BY:
DATE:

7. Freeboard & ESW = 1.0 ft See design in field Office
file for freeboard and emergency spillway depth
designed.
8. Silage Leachate Collection
The original waste plan for this operation did not address
the silage leachate problem from three trench silos.
Leachate Collection Design
The floors of all three trench silos are concrete. The
walls are vertical cut walls in earth that appears to have a
low permeability. Clean water diversions need to be
constructed around all the silos. Ground water does not
appear to be a problem. Plastic silage covers are used to
reduce runoff from entering silage.
References for locating silos recommend locating silos 300
feet from water conveyances such as road side ditches, tile
drains, etc. and 50 feet from wells. Due to the location of
these silos to surface water conveyances, grass filters have
not adequately treated the silage juices. A viable storage
alternative is to direct silage leachate flow into the
manure system. The pollutant can be spread at an
agronomical correct rate to recycle the nutrients.
One way minimize pumping and storing so much liquid is to
use a high -flow bypass. A sump pump system will handle the
low flow, highly concentrated silage leachate and first
flush from silo floor. High flow runoff from silos will be
diluted by clean water from surrounding areas and treated in
grass filter available downstream of bypass collections
system.
Runoff will flow through a 4" wide weir in curb. A 2"
rise will be constructed downstream of weir to force water
into weir. Weir flow will enter a collection box and a 6"
pipe will carry water to pump pit. All of the runoff
collected from the silos will be pumped to the waste storage
pond.
More runoff than can pass through the 411 weir will overflow
the collection area and flow through the grass filter
available.
The weir flow from each silo will likely be less than .07
cfs or 31 gal/min. During larger storm events the weir will
flow approximately double this flow rate.
All leachate and runoff will be piped to one sump collection
box.

Total runoff area = 48,600 sq ft impervious and 25,400 sq ft
previous
Runoff from empty silos can be diverted by plugging weir.
Since a silo is normally emptied completely before opening
the next silo and the cover on the silo diverts all clean
water, the drainage area collected will likely be
approximately % the total drainage area of the three silos.
Average size of area collected
Impervious area = 24,600 sq ft
Pervious area = 12,900 sq ft
Total = 37,500 sq ft
The runoff peak volume from the 25 yr storm will not be
collected.
The collection pit will be sized to store approximately 2
hours of normal runoff. This will prevent the pump from
cycling on and off continuously.
Volume = 2.0 hours x 60 min/hr x 31 gal/min/silo x 3 silos
= 11,160 gallons = 1,492 cu ft
A basin 14'x14'x 8' will store 1,568 cu ft or 11,729
gallons.
Volume stored = 1,568 cu ft/37,500 sq ft x 12 "/ft
= 0.50" over average W/S area collected
Note: Since sump basin holds first flush, a pump flow rate
of 100 gallons per minute should be adequate with this sump
basin size. A full basin can be pumped out in 11,729
gallon/100 gallons/min (118 minutes or 2 hours).
Leachate Volume to Store for 6 Months
The volume of leachate and runoff to store is unpredictable.
The volume depends of how effective plastic cover diverts
water and the area of concrete in silo not covered with
silage. Based on silo locations and potential to divert
clean water, it is anticipated that only 50t of the maximum
potential drainage area will be collected. When a silo is
emptied, it shall be cleaned and weir collection point
plugged. It is estimated that 75t of the normal runoff from
drainage area will be collected. The other 25t will likely
bypass the weir and go directly to grass filter.

5
6 months:
September through February Surface Runoff Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.4511* 24,600 sq ft x 75% = 19,142 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.57"* 121900 sq ft x 75% = 4,491 cu ft
12 in/ft
Total - 19,142 + 4,491 = 23,633 cu ft
The literature also suggests that 1 cu ft/year of leachate
storage is needed for every ton of silage stored. At 35 lbs
per cu ft and silage depth of 10 feet the 19,000 sq ft of
silo storage area will store approximately 3,325 tons.
Use leachate storage of 3,325 cu ft per year will be used.
Total silage leachate and runoff storage for 6
months
= 3,325/2
= 1,663 cu
ft/6 months
B.
Summary of Design Volumes
I.
Surface Runoff
35,725
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
14,089
cu
ft
4.
Manure
70,292
cu
ft
5.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
43,316
cu
ft
6.
Silo Runoff
23,633
cu
ft
7.
Silo Leachate
1,663
cu
ft
TOTAL
188,718
cu
ft
8.
Rainfall minus Evaporation
0.8
ft
9.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall
.5
ft
10.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
1.0
ft
Total
2.3
ft

Sizing Cast Iron Submersible Pump
By: Sam Bingham, CE 5-08
280' — 6" PVC
Pipe from basin
to waste pond
50' of Elevation
Difference from basin to
waste pond
Model KZN55CH
Pump or Equal
Waste
Pond
Total Static Head 50 feet
Friction Head Loss, .03 psi loss/100' x 280' x2.31 ft/psi 0.2 feet
Pressure Head at Pond 0
Velocity Head, 1.092/(2*32.2) 0.0 feet
TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD 50.2 feet
Note: Friction Head Loss based on PVC pipe flowing with 100 gallons/min
Using a Model KZN55CH by BJM CORP. pump, the flow rate in pipe will be 100
gallons/min.
The rated HP for this pump is 7.5.

Name: OSBORNVILLE Location: 036' 02'02.65" N 080* 59'07.4611 W
Date: 5121/2008 Caption: Charlie Williams Dairy
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Location Map
Iredell County, North Carolina

�cBJ M
PUMPS
7/24/2006
Visit our website: www.bimpumps.com 0808
Supersedes
0807
TECHNICAL DATA
MODEL KZN55CH
HEAVY DUTY SLURRY PUMP — CHROME IRON / HARDENED DUCTILE IRON
GENERAL DATA
MAX. FLOW: GPM L/min
449 GPM 1699 L/min
MAX. HEAD: ft m
69' 21 m
MAX. SUBMERSION DEPTH: ft m
200" 61 m or limited to length of ower cord
PUMP TYPE
SLURRY HANDLING
SOLID SIZE: in mm
1" 25.4 mm
STRAINER OPENING: in mm
1.375" 34.9 mm
PUMP DOWN WATER LEVEL: in mm
12" 305 mm
IMPELLER DIAMETER: in mm
10.82" 275 mm
DISCHARGE SIZE
3" NPT-MALE 4" NPT-MALE OPTIONAL
DISCHARGE CONNECTION (Optional)
3" or 4" HOSE BARB
PUMP WEIGHT, without cable: lbs k
367 Ibs 166.8 k
SHIPPING WEIGHT: Ibs k
420 Ibs. 191 k
CONSTRUCTIONIMATERIAL DATA
DUAL MECHANICAL SEALS
SILICON CARBIDE/SILICON CARBIDE
MOTOR HOUSING
CAST IRON
PUMP VOLUTE
DUCTILE IRON
WEAR PLATE
HI -CHROME
AGITATOR
H I-C Fi RO M E
IMPELLER
MULTI VANE, HI -CHROME
STRAINER/STAND
STEEL
LIP SEALS & O-RINGS
BUNA-N
ROTOR SHAFT
410 SS
EXTERNAL HARDWARE
304 SS
QTY. OIL IN SEAL CHAMBER
49 U.S. FL. OZ. 1450 C.C.
BALL BEARING: PERM, LOBE. UPPER
6306
BALL BEARING: PERM. LUBE. LOWER
6308
ELECTRICAL /MOTOR DATA
MOTOR: TYPE, RATING HP
SUBMERSIBLE, 7.5
MOTOR RPM
1750
MOTOR INSULATION CLASS
H
MOTOR SERVICE FACTOR
1.15
VOLTAGE - 3 PH, 60 Hz
208V option
230V
460V
575V option
CURRENT F.L.A.
21.4
19.5
9.5
17.8
LOCKED ROTOR CURRENT (LRA)
143
130
65
148
MOTOR PROTECTION
THERMAL & AMP. OVERLOAD
POWER CORD : GAGE; LENGTH
A.W.G. 10/5; 50' 15.2m , SOOW
MAXIMUM LIQUID TEMPERATURE
104°F 40°C
SEAL LEAK DETECTOR OPTIONAL
Seal MinderTM; MOISTURE SENSING PROBE
1- Available in other voltages (and in 50 Hz).
2- Changed to 5 lead cord on mid-2006.
3- Requires a seal fall circuit in control panel for warning signal.
02004 - 2006 BJM pumps, LLC. All rights reserved.
123 Spencer Plain Road
Old Saybrook, CT. 06475, USA
[phone] - (877) BJM-PUMP - Fax: [phone]
REFER TO REVERSE SIDE FOR PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVES
SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE

rn �B J M
w PUMPS
LLI L—
I— LLI
LLI L31
2 ILL
so
24
21 70
18 60
a
LU
U 15 50
Q
>- 12 40
J
Q
O g 30
6 ---� 20
3 10
0 0
MODEL: KZN55CH
UL
LL
LLB
L3.
L1
WIEl
60
• 50
40 8
30 6
20 4
10 2
0 n
U.S. GALLONS 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
LITERS
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
MOTOR: 7.5 HP
SPEED: 1750 RPM
VOLTAGE: 230/460 VOLT, 60 Hz, 3 PH
option 575V, 60 Hz, 3 PH
IMPELLER: 10,82" DIA.
DISCHARGE SIZE: 3" NPT MALE(STANDARD)
HEAD
_
PUMP
EFF.
B.N.P.
2/17/2006 supersedes priors FLOW RATE PER MINUTE SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
O 2004 - 2006 BJM Pumps, LLC. All rights reserved.

2'x2' Collection Box
Weir invert - 60.7
Pipe Invert - 59.0
6' PVC PIP
-650' to Don
W/S Area
19,40 sq ft
2'x2' Collection Box
Weir Invert - 62.5
Pipe Invert - 60.5
2'x2' Junction Box
Pipe Invert - 53.5
Pump Pit
14'x14'x8'
Bottom Elev. - 50.0
Top of Wall - 58.0
Emergency Spillway - 59.0
ESW Width - 10'
Top of Dike - 60.0
Top Width of Dike - 8'
All Side Slopes - 34
Fence around Pump Pit.
\�
Prismoldal Volume Results
❑rlglnal Surface Modell
or
Final Surface Modeli
pIt
Cut Compaction Factor,
0.00
Fill Compaction Factory
0.00
Raw Cut Volume,
18.66 cu yd
Compacted Cut Volume,
0.00 cu yd
Total Cut Volume,
18.66 cu yd
THM
Concrete
105.6
Raw Fill Volume,
Compacted Fill Volume:
Total Fill Volume.
406.58 cu yd
0.00 cu yd
40mini cu yd
W/S A a
Pump pit maybe relocated
to minimize
30,500 q At
earth fill required.
300' - 6'
PVC Pipe
2`x2' Collection Box
Weir Invert - 93.0
Into Ipe Invert - 91.0 f
Pond J
6' PVC Pipe
-500'
heavy Duty Submersible Pump and
Control Panel with float switches
and red light & horn alarm
100 0 100 200 300
Scope V = 100'
Charlie Williams Dairy
Iredeil County, North Carolina
Leachate Control Plan
U.S. DEPART E13NT OF AGRICULTURE
MAT AL RESOURCESCONSEtVA NSERVi
or
a.a SCB s.ns
oe.o SCB
r� s..ra srwR
w€liiams65

Iversion on 4% slope to the collection box
Slab -- 10' wide x 12' long
Slope 2' toward the curb
Runoff from Silos
€lects In Diversion
\ Leachate an Irst flush
\4\ will be divertedI to
Waste Storage Pon
through a 4' wide not
In concrete curb
Collection Box -
2'x2'x2' minimum
Cover with Heavy
Duty Traffic Grate.
See plan view drawing
for location of collection boxes.
Elevations are also on the plan
view sheet;
Clean Water Outlet is 2' higher than
notch In curb to control Leachate
Height - 6'
Width 6'
1 horizontal. No. 4
in center of curb
Water piped to waste
Pipe Diameter - 6'
PVC Pipe
Charlie Williams Dairy
Iredell County, North Carolina
Silo Leachate Detail
Waste Management S tem
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATI]Rn RESOURCES CONSERVA3JON SERVICE
SCB 5-oe
„� , leachate

AW
1nClL Z�S�><
5
STREAM CRa5S1NG
zoo"( t z.5,
zo �A R
ICED flsa
e
�C4N�p{tbap�fAr(CC
kA
j
�WW-15
ER II poND t SILi}��_r4
—Il
Frr d
HASTE Po ND
i=5u/ - +' BELo%V TOPDF DAM
MAx1M)jwl LEVEL/ ZX I3ELDW TOP OF DAM
5CA L E I Zoo'
i. C. WILLIAMS DAIRY
IREDELLCOON7Y, MDRTH CARDLINA
PLAN of5W
WASTE KANAGEMEN7 5YSrk-M
II_ S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
/+ SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SGS-ENG-313A REV e-7, .

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AVVC490017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection __ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit; Follow-up County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/13/2007 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:00 PM
Farm Name: T.C. Williams Farm. Inc.
Owner: Thomas C Williams
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone:7D4-592-2338 _
Mailing Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop Union Grove NC 286899206
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°01'28 Longitude: 81°QQ'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on Burke Rd. Farm
is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
W Otherlssues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 21968
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date: _� 4$J
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
29. Initial inspection conducted on 11/16/07 identified improper disposal of dead animals; NOV issued on 11/27/07. Improper disposal
of dead animals has been addressed.
ib
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 12/1312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490017
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
❑ Cattle Dairy Calf
85
Q Cattle Dairy Heifer
80
0 Cattle Dry Cow
35
Cattle -Milk Cow
200
Total Design Capacity: 400
Total SSLW: 438,750
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 24.00
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
U
■
U
U
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
Q
Page: 2

4
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
FILEColeen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
November 27, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Thomas C. Williams
T.C. Williams Farm, Inc.
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28689
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2007-PC-0794
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
T.C. Williams Farm, Inc./Facility 49-17
General Permit AWC490017
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on November 16, 2007, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
• Facility Operator failed to calibrate waste application equipment once in the first two (2)
years after issuance of the Certificate of Coverage (COC) and then at least once every
two (2) years thereafter. This is a violation of General Permit Condition II.24, and the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
• Facility Operator failed to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours, by burial of
at least three (3) feet deep, and at a distance greater than 300 feet from a surface water
feature. This is a violation of General Permit Condition II.9, the CAWMP, and the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary
Division's General Statutes and Regulations.
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] No ehCaro ina
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: www.ncwater ualit .or NWA(rall'y

T.C. Williams Farm, IncHacility 49-17
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
November 27, 2007
Page 2
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by December 14, 2007,
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future.
In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of the first page.
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely,
ALLI\ -
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report dated November 16, 2007
cc: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Veterinary Division
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Animal Feeding Operations Unit, Raleigh
Regional Files
jb

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 490017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490017 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 11/16/2007 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM
Farm Name: T.C. Williams Farm. Inc.
=M-Willr ••T%F�'Il► ��
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: 704-5&2a�d
Mailing Address: JA QUrke Farm Loop Union Grove NC 286899206
Physical Address:
Facility Status: n Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:36°01'28" Longitude:81'00'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on Burke Rd. Farm
is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 21968
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beall Phone:�35"�«2
Inspector Signature: .� Date:
Secondary Inspecto
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
9
Inspection Date: 11/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
10/08/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.3 Lbs/1000 Gallons
06/18/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 10.3 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/22/07 > Soil Analysis
24. Failure to calibrate waste application equipment once in the first two (2) years after issuance of the COG and then at least once
every two (2) years thereafter; NOV to follow.
29. Improper disposal of dead animals; NOV to follow.
Silage Leachate must be controlled following BMPs to prevent potential discharge. Facility Operator advised to coordinate with Iredell
SWCD/NRCS to develop and implement a plan to address ASAP!
C.
Page: 2

4f `
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number, 490017
Inspection Date: 11/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
85
25
Q Cattle -Dairy Heifer
80
60
Cattle - Dry Cow
35
30
Cattle - Milk Cow
200
195
Total Design Capacity: 400
Total SSLW: 438,750
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 24,00 48.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number : 490017
Inspection Date: 1111612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? r l ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ M ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) Q ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0000
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
.0000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
OSO
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

�
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 11/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
Q
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Soybean,
Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■
Q n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■
n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■
Q n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■
n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
n
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 11/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
Cl
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

` Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 11/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

�/av ZLI07—/2c-a7F[E [�
y 1 2007
Poo A41- Seale-
b a Z C o vt/� rr Nd oz Cy lees Tip f/j e- "Ve
sl �e tA�Ch /g 0V-et 3aa
2 R,c% e/� a�aT we'll c% 5/1ds e- W S.IC i� it e f"u���e
�4ae fo ygNc ACe 01,1A Cq /i'6r f1i:A Vll?ile— @ yall A4 e jc/7-
"? S/d/ `h'S
J
q �ow�� iL%! e lla�d

North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Veterinary Division
P.O. Box 26026, Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
GENERAL REPORT OF COMPLAINT
COUNTY: Iredell
OWNER: Charlie Williams
FACILITY NAME: Thomas
ADDRESS: 139 Burke F
PHONE: 704 / 592 12338
DATE: 12 / 19 / 07
C. Williams Dairy Inc.
DESCRIPTION OF COMPLAINT: Improper Disposal of Dead Domestic Animals
REPORTED BY: DWQ / Mooresville DATE: 11 / 22 / 07
COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY: Veterinary Division Office
IS3 INFORMATION REQUIRED
VMO: Sheppard DATE ASSIGNED: 12 / 05 / 07
ACTION: Premise Inspection
COMPLETE ACTION BY: 12 / 30 / 07
REASON FOR ACTION: Apparent Violation
DATE OF INVESTIGATION: 12 / 11 / 07
INVESTIGATORS: John Singleton
DISPOSITION: James Bealle reported to our office that cattle were buried by Charlie
Williams some time in early November and were too close to a moving stream .Mr.
Bealle wanted me to go back with him in late December to determine if the animals
needed to be moved . I thought under these conditions that would be waiting too long .
I contacted Mr. Williams by telephone and was told the deads had already been moved
and buried at another location. I went to this premise on 12 / 11 / 07 and saw everything
had been done according to our regulations. I thanked Mr. Williams for his cooperation
and told him everything looked to be in order.
I contacted the DWQ office in Mooresville and left a message for Mr. Bealle relating
the same.
SIGNATURE AND DA'
FURTHER ACTIO QUIRED: Pleases �acopjy of this report to DWQ / 704 / 663
/ 1699 . Thank You
SIGNATURE AND DATE: ]RECEIVED
CO-10
Revised 12/93 DEC 2 7 2007
NC DENR MRO
DWQ-Surface Water Protection

❑ Division of Water Quality
t
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II--11
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490017 IJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: OpeCg ions Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Iredell Region:
Date of Visit: 06/28/2007 Entry Time; 01:go PM Exit Time: 02:40 PM
Farm Name: T.C. Williams Farm. Inc.
Owner: Thomas C Williams
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 139 Burke Farm Loop Union Grove NC a§6899205
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:36°01'28" Longitude: "
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill, Turn left on Burke Rd. Farm
is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
N Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
IN Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams Operator Certification Number: 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie Williams Phone:
On -site representative Charlie Williams Phone:
Primary Inspector: Cindy Safrit Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: 6/18/2007 -10.3 IbN/1000gal (1) 4/20/2007 - 3.7 IbN11000gal Irr. pond
5.2 lbN/1000gal (2) 5.8 IbN/1000gal Back of barn
7.5 IbN/1000gal (3) 6.7 IbN/ton calf barn
Soil Analysis: 2/22/2007 for 2006 soil samples
Calibration complete Sept. 30, 2006, Tank looks good. I will contact Ken Vaugh about irrigation calibration.
9) Area below heifer barn should be worked to keep fresh water away from waste & feed. Suggest boards or grading work. Keep an
eye an silage leachate pit below lower silo should be cleaned out periodically to allow leachate setting time.
9,1361AL FOR ANIMALS MUST BE 300' FROM WATERCOURSE.
%Obeck calibration procedure for irrigation.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/28/2007
Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 222
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 24.00 48.00
Page:2 "Ow�

i
y
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Wiiliams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 06/28/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Q ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 06/28/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No . NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Cecil
Soil Type 2
Chewacla
Soil Type 3
Madison
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
s
Page: 4

A
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
11
Inspection Date: 06/28/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Q
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Voc
Nn
NA
MF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 06/28/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. bid Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredeil
Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/01/2006 Entry Time:11. 30 AM Exit Time: 01:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: T.C- Williams Farm, Inc.
Owner Email:
Owner: Thomgs,Q Williams
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: J39 BWrkg Fa[M Loon
Union Grove NC 286899205
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
26'0128" Longitude: 81°00'00",
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on Burke Rd. Farm
is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charlie L Williams
Operator Certification Number: 21968
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Charlie L. Williams
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Charlie L. Williams
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle
Phone: C'10�i)'2�.c�"5-z 16a
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary: -
11/03/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.5 Lbs11000 Gallons
04/18/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.8 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/19/06 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly.
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 200
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pond WSP 24.00 48.00
Page: 2

.
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams Facility Number: 490017
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream lmpacta Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Q ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Cl
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit.? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
Q
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

a
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Facility Number : 490017
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste 4plicat9an
Yes
No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Appbcation outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Com
(Silage)
Crop Type e 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
IN
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
0 ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Q
■
Q ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

4
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
Cl
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑ ■
❑
24- Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0 ■ 0 ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

A
Permit: AWC490017 Owner - Facility: Thomas C Williams
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

I l
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit XCompIiance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit X Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: :3d Departure Time: County:
r t w�1
Farm Name: !a �A%til " F Ain Owner Email:
Owner
Phone:
Region:
Mailing Addrerss, /1� !riy/Ctr Wi tlrB�7 �✓+� 96
Physical Address: L ,,f
Facility Contact: C 42(l�' L4*q / W Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 111 Integrator:
Certified Operator: % Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedei
Farrow to Finish
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =o =' =" Longitude: =o =, =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Cgpacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La e
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
?;Dairy Cow
0600
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Zeef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes J�PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

t
Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection ��' 1'f• a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
Spillway?: Pf
gft
Designed Freeboard (in): a'ti 4WFV 4
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ;R No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? K Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require X yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes O(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 59 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Dritl El Application Outside of Area
l
12. Crop type(s) ep IS-14C 15fi01 r 1rfoos
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes JW No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
09 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
115No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
29 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): la.xplain any YF,S answerµ and/or any reconnnendalions or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
64
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: - a
12128104 Continued

It
• Facility Number: V --17 I Date of Inspection — •-8
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropiiate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Other
❑ Design El Maps
❑ Yes bRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [8 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 9 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application JU Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ® 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ® Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
F1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
RNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
F&I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
IAdditional Comments and/or Drawings:
7 MJjh S� 40 �EQj) C*Wo- µ�;f�,� s�,►�'s Mk .�1f . �d� Sorg b,.r�r,� k� ,�,d pd�,�.
*P Creek 45/4t '
12129104

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 10, 2004
T.C. Williams
T.0 Williams Farm
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689-9205
Subject; Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490017
T.0 Williams Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear T.C. Williams.
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
To correct the facility's animal capacity and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are
hereby forwarding to you this corrected Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T.C. Williams,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application
system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the T.0 Williams Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy Cows, 85 Calves, 80 Heifers, 35 Dry Cows, and the
application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void the
COC dated October 1, 2004, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
N°M Carolina
Natundly
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Custun]er Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.s1ate.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone].623-6748
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be tiled at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
CC' (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490017
APS Central Files

O� 'W A ]F� Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
a �
T.C. Williams
T.0 Williams Farrt
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689-9205
Dear T.C. Williams:
4.
October 1, 2004
wow co
ojii
cf-s
Subject. Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490017
T.0 Williams Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General. Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 6, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T.C.
Williams, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490017 which expires October 1, 2004,
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the T.0 Williams Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 400 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] f FAX, 919-715-0588 / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc,us %��,ry `l�l ye���
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper �% Y I t
to

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the C.A.WMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief,
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit 'by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office.
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredeli County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490017
APS Central Files

�(m6
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Wiliam G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 15, 2004
Mr. T.C. Williams
139 Burke Farm Rd
Union Grove NC
Subject: T.0 Williams Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490017
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
Mr. William Burke of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June 3,
2004. Based on his observations all records were found to be complete. However, attention needs
to be directed to the calf barn closest to the entrance to the farm to prevent any runoff from
occurring, as was discussed with you during the site visit. Enclosed please find a copy of the
inspection report, which should be self-explanatory
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Burke or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
� ,
D. Rex GIeason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
NLDElt
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 877-623-6748
FAX [phone]

lF , s ti r �r • Division of Water Quality':
O DfvieiatroSoil,and`Wate�,Conservatiap�.
O Q egAeencg: ' a ,
t
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility dumber Date of Visit: h-I-2i104 'rime:
_._ O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified Q Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or .above "rhreshold:.........._...
Farm Name: I.C..W.illliam..k'.arin.................................................................................... County: JX.0a................................................ NaQ...........
t)«ner Name: .C........................................... )?4'iUialats..................................................... I'Itone No: 7.1J9r.S�Z.:2238...........................................................
Mailing Address: 139..Ruul�e.kauna.iaaQ�r..................................................................... C(miant.GKAxe.N.C.................................................
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
....................................... ride:..............
Phone No:
......................................................................................... Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Opera tor:Qariel:..L.............................. wMiAMN .......................................... Operator Certification .Number:119.68.............................
Lucation of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Unney Mill. Turn left on
Burke Rd. Farm is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Vine miles north of Statesville.
[]Swine []Poultry ®Cattle []Horse Latitude 73670 01 28 Longitude $1 • 00 00
Design Current
Swine C'anneity Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Design Current
Design • Current.-.
Poultry
capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population.
❑ Layer
I
1
® Dairy
1 400 2Q0
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total, Design Capacity
400
Total !sg W
560,000
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. 1£ discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If ves. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structtre I Structure 2 Structure = Simicfure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ...................................................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 49-17 Date of Inspection FT1-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 9 Yes ❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes No
❑ Excessive Ponding Q PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWNW)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes E j No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Improve area around calf barn ,near house, to prevent any runoff from occurring.
Reviewer/Inspector Name lt�: , II
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Condnued

Facility Number: 49-17 1 Date of inspection 6-1-211f}4
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
CK No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
0 No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit XCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit lk Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
NJ Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .T��lt�r................................................................... County; ..Xr.9Allf k.........................................................
OwnerName:.....M.lt�... � t rt�l��!h f........................................................................ Phone No C4o.f�i .....................................................
MailingAddress: .... L1.01 .....4.P................................................ ......... UAV e... Q:R.RMA............................. ..........................
Facility Contact: ' ... %l! f t!h... »... ............. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ...... ................. ».».....»....................... ..... .................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator: ................................... . .......... ..»..»».».......».....»...»........................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry PgCattle ❑ Norse Latitude • ' " Longitude • 4 94
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
IN Dairy
pp
OL 0,0
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
J
El
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes K No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes a No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes -9 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................».».............................. .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection I tv — o 11
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 52 No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes JR No
❑ Yes g{ No
❑ Yes ER No
12. Crop type bj&&E ( 1)k N
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor 'issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ® No
[_—]Yes ❑ No
[a Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X.No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes $M No
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other eom ments.i
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
1):ZojRo-04 A*c* Ara..rai caWj8MW +.a p rtoq„ f� AAV R"o OFF
9
-' Qe cotj S Rppeory It I'm nod S -opt .
�
Reviewer/huspector Name 1A Is'..1 . A ' ` R
r
ReviewerAnspector Signature: r Date: rp —[ — c:p
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: —171 Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[0 No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
R] No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
GgNo
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
MfNo
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

W A7e9©G
7
ci
Ca `C
'I" ,.I� Michael F. ely.vernor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and ?Natural Resources
I Afan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Ir Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 17, 2003
Mr. Charlie Williams
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28684
Subject: T.C. Williams Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage #: AWC490017
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
October 15, 2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained,
and the records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which
should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johanson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

• Division of Water Quality
" O Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
O Other Agency'
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
i Date of Visit: l0/15/2003 Time:
Facility Number 49 17 I
I ± O Not O terational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified l7 Registered Date last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
FarmName: I.C.Ml RUM.FairM.................................................................................... County: Ircidell ................................................ MQ...........
OwnerName: IX ........................................... W..Ruaittt"s..................................................... Phone No: 244-59Z-Z33............................................................
Mailing .address: I�9.�utrlac.karrzi.1.�nA>}...................................................................... I.Iiaiam.Qr.Qyg..Nr.................................................. 2409-2205..
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:.CH,ARLIE.YaLLLAM....................................................... Integrator:.................
Certified Operator:.hgxjjo..L.............................. WilliAms.......................................... Operator Certification Number:219.0.8 .............................
Location of Farm:
?rom the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on
3urice Rd. Farm is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3b • O1 28 Longitude 81 • DO 00 ••
Design Current
Swine Caneclty Pooulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle capacity Population
❑ Layer JZ Dairy 400 190
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 400
Total SSLW 560,000
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Inilmets
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. notify DWQ) [] Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Stmeture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................ .......................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 36

v�i v�i v r
f Facility Number: ' 49-17 Date of Inspection 10/15/2003
• 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlieation
%.11168&11"CU
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ W1JP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
[] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�. '• VIIy,' 1'y�,3`f^d^r�y1,, .. �,K. . .. 4,r� nr .. .t,'-+ " } ,..+ •{
o{�}mentsrfetrtQ,gi�e9on�. Expl#,aay�r}.'ES�aQsvi�ers audlor any recammend�tipns ar�awny��er�°�omment�';
Use drawings'of fac&Vt6 better ezplain situation's. (use additional pages as necessary): Field Copy ❑ Final Notes g
ACILITY IS PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan Johson
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: lC %—/ 7—C 3

� , z,4,?- /
13
MC D717 fz�"Tq0NMETJT
'�­SOURCES
NOV 2 5 2002

wAr
©� EApG MiraelEasley '
Governor
WrTiam G. Russ, Jr.,Secretary
> North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Nan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Charlie Williams
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28684
Dear Mr. Williams:.
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 15, 2002
7001 2510 0005 0297 9948
Subject: Notice of Violation (NOV)
T.C. Williams Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490017
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility November 14,
2002. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation for the following reasons:
• Over application of PAN to wheat on. tract 587. This is in violation of Section H.
No. 4 of your general permit.
Failure to obtain a waste analysis within 60 days of the waste application date for the
waste applied in January 2002. This is a violation of Section III. No. 4 of your
general permit.
Failure to comply with the conditions of your general permit is a violation of your
Certificate of Coverage pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10C. Be advised
that North Carolina General Statutes provide for civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation per
day as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental laws and regulations.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by November 28, 2002
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violations. Please address your response to the
attention of Mr. Johnson. It is also requested that your response reference the date and subject of
this NOV, as well as the facility number.
AS
NMENWR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone] O

Page 2
Williams
By copy of this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local District
Soil and Water Conservation office, DWQ is referring this facility for technical assistance, if
appropriate. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at (704) 663- 1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
File

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
)ate Of Visit: 11fI312002 Time:
Faciiih' Number 49 17
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: LC S'.4'1JIiRIM&FRSA............................................................... Count): licV.&IJ...................... -_........... .. MQ........
Owner Name; �.__._-----------------'E-'iliRa[Rs---•---------------------- Phone No: 59.4'3$----------------------------------
]Mailing Address': M2.liu k c-EareaLo.0 z...................................................................... [TUjQ. t.GjraxC.NC..................................................
FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No:......................................
Onsite Representative: �)�j$ _----•-----------_-_-_--- Integrator:.___._._._.___-_-_________ --_� _--__-_-
Certified Operator:Cktarlic.1 .. .......................W.ijiAalm,S........................................... Operator Certification Number:z19fg................... ,.........
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Linney Mill Rd. (SR 1598), travel west approx. 2 mi. on Linney Mill. Turn left on
Burke Rd. Farm is on the left about 200 yards. General location: Nine miles north of Statesville,
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 0 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 41 28 66 Longitude 81 • 00 00 •�
47.:r.
Design Current
Swine Canacity-Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design
Current Design Current
:Poultry capacity
Yo ulation Caere Capacity Population
❑ LayerJ
®Dairy 400
22t]
❑ Non -Layer
I
j
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity.: 400
�, Total SSLW'.
560,000
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gailmin"?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system:' (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
NVaste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Sn-ucture 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................ ........... ........................... ............ ........... .............................. ........................... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 24
n c in s in r r ..».:»....r

VJ/VJ/V■ I.VJNu/ItCti ,
Facility Number: 49-17 Date of Inspection 11/13/2002 .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes R No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes O No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ID No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
S No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
X No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
Z No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Recluired Records & Docutimit-s
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) X Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 19 No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes g No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.{�oi.i yyx� I T - A, per . t�ns"".,-/F
.a"fa,,,���/// P;:sk 4: pvTf1m ii
��'.E�Y! S_Y �,�f.�uaRiPr �J+Y� ..
i
ram! , �'' ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
OVER APPLICATION OF N OCCURRED ON TRACT 587. THE OVER APPLICATION WAS LESS THAN 100/t, OF PAN.
--FAILED TO OBTAIN A WASTE ANALYSIS WITHIN 60 DAYS FOR WASTE APPLIED IN JANUARY 2002.
NOV TO BE ISSUED FOR THE ABOVE.
---AS SOON AS WEATHER ALLOWS THE WASTE IN THE STORAGE PONDS NEEDS TO BE LAND APPLIED.
--THE ADDITIONAL ACREAGE THAT HAS BEEN CLEARED IN TRACT 1397 NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FARM
PLAN. THE SOYBEAN CROP SHOULD ALSO BE INCCUDED IN THE PLAN IF IT IS TO RECIEVE WASTE,
Reviewer/Inspector Name A,LAN JOHNSON
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

o�aF w A 7-,�4QG
c
0 �
T. C. Williams
139 Burke Rd.
Union Grove, NC 28684
Dear Mr. Williams:
C On
Subject:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr -Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and 'Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
T.C. Williams Farm, Facility#: 49-17
Iredeli County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required.
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. if the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspeetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
dWA
�DENNT
Customer Service
1 600 623-7748
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson
Environmental'Specialist E
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Fwar�
0 RQ� Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
> North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p C Karr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 17, 2001
Charlie Williams
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28684
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
T.C. Williams Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490017
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May 15,
2001. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency for failing to post emergency action
plan and to have in your files a copy of the odor control, insect control, and mortality checklist.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
/3, , �?, ?, e,.
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
N6EN t
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Q Time: ! •ed
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
$-Permitted!4 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.
Farm Name: ............. I � I C ........� 1..!1.!. {ti ,�...... cK Gvi......................... County:..... a..rtr C ' � 1......_....................................
Owner Name: ............ .......
.. Phone No:.. W.- ...............
FacilityContact: ...................... _........... ............................................ Title: .... ................................... ...................... Phone No: ..................... ..........................
Mailing Address: .....J 1:_ 13A �'�C� .... r .».».L�? ._.......»............
��y/�11
Onsite Representative: � L_ : ._. I!/r acrF3...._.... Integrator:........_ ... .......... ......_............ .....
_..._...... _. ... p .......... --,� _. _ ........
Certified Operator; ,,,,,,,,,,,,, � L.G „....... „, L �/ c ��-,_....... Operator Certification Number:...-.».--,,,,-,,,,,„,,,,,M_.»
Location of Farm:
I.W.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �' �� �44
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Po ulation Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Po ulatioa
Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of •Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds! Solid Traps '� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes RLNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes allo
OI/0l/01
Continued

Facility Number. — ~- Date of Inspection r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ SpiIlway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. ......._....._............... ..... ............ .._._...... ..__... . __... _.._.........._ . __ ._ ...._._.........................................
r r
Freeboard (inches) ....__.._p ..... .............._...........................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes [.�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance improvement?
❑ Yes
Ga No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
&No
Wastc application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type t'-' d �r � S i 7-1 4 / zr--� � �.
�L_
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
1Z'N0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0<9
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
'Eg-do
I7. Are rock out present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Is there ter supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
f No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie! WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
8 Yes
7 �4o
21. Dues record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
&No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
;ZNo
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie! discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
,QNo
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
4 No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[t Yes
LRNo
27. �,Vt—e any additional problems note- which cause noncompliance of the Certified A«'MP?
❑ Yes
[9ZN0
Odor issues
?S. Does the discharge pipe from the c ::►nement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
[ Y.,
❑ No
:iouid level of lagoon or storage pcnd %vith no agitation?
29. .=.-z .here any dead animals not di:- sed of properly within 24 hours?
rNo
_ -•'
:. 1 /41
_n
ued

Facility Number: _ Date of Inspection
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes . - gi No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ %��. ��� Date:

Coll
NCDENR
f ..
+.Ti4MES.13 HUN JR ,.
t1_11-
Ne,
NORTH CAROLINA 'DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE- REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 16, 2000
T. C. Williams
139 Burke Rd.
Union Grove, NC 28689
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Operation inspection
T. C. Williams Farm, Facility #: 49-17
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on August 15, 2000. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency for failing
to have an accompanying waste analysis for the waste applications made in June of
1999.
In general, based on Mr. Johnson's observations, with the exception of the
waste analysis, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained and the
records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be
self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
File
rr�sr
Irr AM FY.ILA
a o 1 a
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVI LLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AF1rIRMATIV9 ACTION EMPLOYER - 150% RECYCLED/10% POST —CONSUMER PAPER

�Biivision of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit CR Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit )Q Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date Id visit: -< Time: 1 Printed on. 7/2112000
1 Facility dumber��—
�. O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted gCertified []Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or :)hove Threshold: .................
Farm Name: �— /� County: ........ $!.-.no (o.........................................
Ownerdame:....... ....T, ........................ !l..,l .,( ............................. Phone No:........ ...1�zc..-`..... ............................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................1'itle:.........................
4 r�d
Mailing .address: ....... � �v.�......r....... —.. �c3 c?` ��.....5 .........
Onsite Representative: .. ..............wu-�`.1..,,,�.....C-Li�............
...........
Certified Operator:........�f !t1 ..L ............ ..�.tj.. l IMs ..... ... .. ..............
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
.........................�J`�r-?il............... k......
Inte-rator................................... ....................................................
Operator Certification Number: ....... r�1..(o_ ..........
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry aCattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ° •• Longitude • < tf
Design Current
Swine Canacity Pnoulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagelon Area ❑ Spray Field area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is anv discharge observed From any part of the operation'?
El Yes
Na
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, wxs the conveyance man-made?
❑Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. slid it reach Water of the State". (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑yes
❑ No
c. II' dischargx is observed. what is the estimated Ilow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
; No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
XNo
Structure I Su•ueture ? Structure Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: .....................................................................
Freeboard f incheal: 7V
5100
Continued
on back

Facility Number: — Date ut' lnspectiun Printed (in: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees. severe erosion. ❑ Yes Z No
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvemen[? ❑ Yes] No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ❑ Yes bl� No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes bQ No
11.
Is there evidence of over applic tion? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
[--]Yes ❑ No
12.
Crop type t.J(t P� L46C4
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes ,KNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ,&No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes gE_No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes itp No
13.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design. maps. etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement'? 6e/ irrigation. Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ Yes No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in chargf'?
❑ Yes ',jZNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergencv situations as required by General Permit?
Cie/ discharge. freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ONO
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes A j No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes A0 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes (2LNo
viQiaiKjtis;or 0e0006es Wkre pbted di�r,�ng#i�4s:vasat: Yoi� witlejoiye too:iirt�ter
correspondence. abbd this visit. •.................................. .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
yf
1-2betj2,4.6ti Iem, tan !�%{,� wC`I ter•-L/���� i
z,0ci5 l �Sl3 / `=14 S /ta //' r�'7"L� � <!2
f� 4'za•lf t
Ir
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %s.. Date: 5100

Facility umber: — Date of inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor helow [3 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes )KNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 49,No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc_) ❑ Yes ENo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes T.No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerared fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'? ❑Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
5100
5100

State of North Carolina 117WA
IT
Department of Environment 1 • 0
and Natural Resources �I
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL 1146561FAUkOF
RNVIRONMENT, HEALTH
February 14, 2000 & NATURAL RMOURCI ,
T.C. WILLIAMS
T.0 WILLIAMS FARM
139 BURKE FARM LOOP
UNION GROVE NC 28689-9205
Dear T.C. Williams:
FEB 18 2000
11NISION OF ENVIRONMENTAi MANAHMEN�
Subject: Application No. AWC4901IPPESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICI
Additional Information Request
T.0 Williams Farm
Animal Waste operation
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 15, 2000:
The first page of the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must list the correct number of animals. According to
the certification amendment there are 200 dairy cows, 35 dry cows, 80 heifers, and 85 calves to young
heifers.
Please provide a clearer map that identifies (outlines or highlights) and shows the acreage for each field to
be used for waste application on Tract 411.
Maximum allowable Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) to be applied must be provided for all crops and fields
listed in the WUP. The Application of Waste by Hauling Tables (Pages 13-15 of the WUP) do not list the
maximum allowable PAN for each crop. These tables only list the application amount by loads of manure.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before March 15, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely,
/usan Caule
Y
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED_
T.C. Williams
T.0 Williams Farm
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689-9205
Farm Number: 49. 17
Dear T.C. Williams:
•
'.1
'A
SEA 22 1999
.,.
NCDENR
�t.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCF-S
September 15, 1999
You are hereby notified that T.0 Williams Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application roust be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
c
far Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (W/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
AMAIATAIilGTN
T.0 Williams Farm
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28699-9205
Dear T.C. Williams:
1 � �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999.�. IMPT. Oil
1RONt►MENT, HEAT."'1
0 NATURAL
JAN 10 2000
MV- 1f� �ii�};�lit?hl`.. Thl. h0`ihfial
Subject: Fertilizer Applical 8iIttcoWtepii!ng
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-17
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or pennitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Nl�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
T. C. Williams
139 Burke Rd.
Union Grove, NC 28684
Subject: Site Inspection
T.C. Williams Farm, Facility#: 49-17
IredeIl County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2.8115
PHONE 704-663-T 609 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen 0 Application for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 601bs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application. rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

A
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
r••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA D T NIT OF
ENVIRONMENT AN I�S
. ��Al�ilA
MAR 5 1998
RN F WINOTIL Iran[
N4ili'iMI loft WM
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number_ I .
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
' Ma� 77
(7/
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility). / L,rJ `c%Dly1
2. Facility No.: 1-7
3. Facility Name: �� , /1i?> � x9J�ll.F l cJ�.0 2 /AA1,4-
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
�'�a L,)(;_11.4Me7
5. Mailing Address: %29' k�/ef. )WIfM C a 14
City:142& gitedye' State: Zip: 47
Telephone No.: ( 704 ) -1972 A 9 33
6. County where facility is located:
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): 4IR
8. Application Date: .2
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
(,�'tltii1�i,IGO'C
��
���tT�6
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the EnvirondWRial �flManagement
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal -waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 1 of 4

G
2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
%vaste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include.
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
60 -41' �f'A '.�' 19"P/�fl�, t-�a v •� r"Pr+�o%Ey !� X T - 9 7 I.W
Aij�2
m N !l 04 fN t q' 4 f
C.
4&j 4J,41Rr 4:eZI eir 4::0P,4,t ,6--7rV
W /;7/
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also Iist the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Applicant's Certification:
I, , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required Farts of this application arc not completed and if all -
Print Name of Owner
Date le�2 �g
igtsature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

Required Items:
One (I) original and two (2) copies of the completed and appropriately executed
annlication form, along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
DiFOR.ti1ATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626.0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T.C. Williams
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689
Dear T.C. Williams:
T `WJ
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 17, 1998 DIMPT
"JUL
tbi ,131 G'
�jx
Subject: Special Agreement .
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
T.0 Williams Farm
Facility Number: 49-17
Iredell County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on February 24, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with T.C. Williams in
order to allow additional time for T.C. Williams to obtain and implement a certified animal waste
management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do .not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 571or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
e�y �'e __
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-17
T.C. WILLIAMS
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by T.C. Williams, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 14313-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works; but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER' is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-17
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date .identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the fast seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the ".OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-17
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For T.0 Williams Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: T.C. Williams
T.0 Williams Farm
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689
Dear T.C. Williams:
1 "" •
10
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANb NATURAL RESOURCES
August 20, 1998
Subject:
Me— PtIPT, qp
gM-'V';t Nk;,T'N dr.
& NA;fv L rn()URe,
Wig* a_ WM'*-Mul. WAr
i414- alk owou. HamSpecial Agreement
Facility Number: 49-17
T.0 Williams Farm
Iredell County
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
A Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: MRO Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Central Files
Shannon Langley
P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/]0% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-17
T.C. WILLIAMS
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by T.C. Williams, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-17
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER' satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNERY control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-17
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For T.0 Williams Farm
Print Name of Gwner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Enviro ental Management Commission:
Date
,,Or.Chairman of the Commission

N.C. DEPT. OIL
I3NNVIRQNMFNT, I4EALTH ,
& NATURAL gFSOURCES
a
i
1, #
_MAW
.� -- � .• ,.% f' ,,� is � ��
a
I -7iF_iJ /f 1 /J /l
•
.�,40
.. �--o.-��. � _ • REF' [[ II �Y
-
r'
r. ,
A

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
,tames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T.C. Williams
T.0 Williams Farm
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689
Dear T.C. Williams:
A, 1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
N.c. 1)e.1,r ()r
PIVON aF EtfVlB�llhf.'"iI@t �., 1;. 6u f
W"wILE E NAI Rig
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
T.0 Williams Farm
Facility Number: 49-17
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a ,good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 %G post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 211,0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
01
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

0
RM
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T. C. Williams
Burke Farm Loop Rd.
Union Grove, NC 28684
Dear Mr. Williams:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 13, 1998
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
T.C. Williams Farm, Facility#: 49-17
Iredell County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 10, 1998 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. A Notice of Violation (NOV) is being issued for the
discharge leaving the paved area where the heifers are housed at the old facility. The
old material (silage/manure/hay) should be removed and the paved area kept clean.
The noted discharge is a violation of North Carolina General ,Statute 143-215.1 (a), in
light of your deemed permitted status.
In addition to the noted violation, the dead calf observed in the drainage ditch
below the old facility should be disposed of in a proper manner. Also, the sludge
dredged from your storage pond should be land applied as soon as possible. For
technical assistance please contact your local Soil and Water District representative.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by March 15,
1998 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problems. Upon receiving your
response a follow up review will be performed.
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOR ESV II -LE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page Two
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (744)
663-1699.
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
01
Sincerely,
Barbara Christian, P.G.
Acting Regional Supervisor

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review''
JODWQ "Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
outipe O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of 'hours.
Farm Status: J-Registered El Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0
>- ❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Ins ection includes travel andprocessing)
x❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....................... . ............................................................................................................................
Farm Ns,pne:... ».��....._ L.U.�1.� i Eti.4 t.i..�......f CLr..U-A.................. County• ...».....»......:..». {{
LandOwner Name; .... ...1 ... ...................1la................................. Phone Na:.... .» ..:.. ��...��............... .......................
FacilityConctact:............. ................... .......................... _..................... Title: » .................................... .......... Phone No:.... .... ..... »................ ......... .................
MailingAddress: ........ L3-..r....... L�..�. 1 ......... ?...... ._.... ... ......................._................. :_r�.114°r....... _..... __........, ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:.......'.. �_�Mi ............................. ........................................... Integrator: ........................................................... I ...........................
Certified Operator: C ff ��` i_�� 43�\............. ....... ..... Operator Certification Number• .. 1. 2k._.
Location of Farm: e}
..tl .:►...... ._ZA:1........ /. /..... "1,-,U iztwi.Ile ........... ......... .R..... ..s7z..... L..i►►.1�x�1 tkt�iL...�.......4
�I. ....... ........5. ..../..S:ri �t......�.. .r.�r � ....���.. ....` %&j,.s.a....�t..l r.)..... �` I..1x:,� �� .........1. � t...:�.r..i! ►1K.....�?►.:..�...L.... �
v G G'F�CXMI r G'iY•�G .Mr t�� J r
Latitude'' Longitude V
Type of Operation and Design Capacity �,��„,••' ;���I 5 �1� `f vnGjG'
Design GWrrent :.: -. ,. __�-_ .. _, .. ,..... �-_•_ ^-------=`
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
C1-Eg9qw to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
Farr w to Finish
❑ Other
Number of �sgoons ! Holding Ponds' 7 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are thcre any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes J1 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? TA Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [I Yes JR] No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes IM No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVinin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify .DWQ) ❑ Yes M No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?' ❑'Yes 1� N6 �^
4. Were there any adverse impacts tR thq writers of the State Bother than from h .discharge? : [;] Yes, �R No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding pondsj,require Yes ❑ No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
No
Structures (Laeoons.Holdirtg Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: .....:.........
Freeboard(ft):............. r......,....... .................................... ................................... .................................... ....................................
....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[ No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
0 Yes
IJ No
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
\No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
MN
17,
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
tR No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(a No
4, 19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
MNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
21.
Did,Reviewer/Inspectar fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
WNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
�R No
For Certirted or Permitted Facilities Qnly A114
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
14 No
24.
Were any -additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
UNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
Q No
0 No violations or deficiencies were -noted during this visit. You.rvill receive 'no further.
correspondence about -this. visit:. :: :: . . . . . . .

J.-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
T. C. Williams
Rt. 1, Box 282
Union Grove, NC 28684
Dear Mr. Williams:
P�ft goomftnwom
IDEHNR
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
FEBRUARY 14, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
T. C. Williams Farm, Facility #: 49-17
Iredell County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on February 12, 1997 by
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental Iaws and regulations.
The facility where you are currently housing your heifers is of some concern because of its location above
the headwaters of a stream. Be sure the person who designs your farm plan is aware of this potential
problem.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. If you
have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
GJ
919 North Main Street, 4C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 7M"M 50°.6 recycled/100,6 post -consumer paper

a,
❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
1
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Zoutine Q Com IRint O Follow-up of DWQ Inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection a2 Z c
Facility Number
Time of Inspection E2= Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:�-e Total Time (in hours) Spent onResiew
.._.r....�..5 L.�......».. �..._......m..........».......
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: _ �A.....» c.la.`..?.�n.S.... .t1h11»........................ County:v--L- a' ... »...... ...........
...............».....»..
Owner Name: Te GC) ll�....Y�:.S.................... .".............. ..., PhoneNo:...... �1. . M.. .3 .._....�.. .....�..
Mailing Address:I L...J�P.K..—.....Z-.'LZ ..............._........
._.
OnsiteRepresentative: _........ ... ...»..... ................. _.._ .......... Integrator: ... ....... _....... _......... ...... " ..... ...........»...... ..".......
Certified Operator:." . `T r l.a" .......... � �, !E............... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude `G Uu Longitude 4 "
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .... .._..... _....... ........ ».......»......... ._................ _............... ....... _.............. .......... ......
_............
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/impmvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
JZ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes
U. No
❑ Yes
ZNo
Continued on back

lot"
2
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? Yes EZ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes RNo
9. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Wo
Structures (Laeoons and/or lloldine Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): _ La Poon 1 Lagoon 2 �. Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes kNo
Lagoon 4
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...1.�..G.kl. l ..r c:..f f.'..... C... f...,f�`.1✓? r..._. U t'rj / ect 7-
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only n/4
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes R[No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes WO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/orany recommendations or any other comments_.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use` additionalpages as necessary):.. ;
(
/t G c I' ��� �U+� � i� � �iu35 /s 10 � q �[t{ Hcar Q � e W r o creek,
4
+s
� 1
u7L, .ua,4 d,,3c�,ge_1A �,-�y� `i�V3 �6N^i.niw�at , `gypj;� Hee�S �-d
1 ff�ac.l,
7� lot-ILCS Qk- 61 4 e-
j M"kv. e%Jev'� 10 'e— 'Nv\ vtolc�� o ►-� o� 5�a�
ce��2aL�_-eca
0.���✓�5.
54^rp_r t•/✓( Sirce tµYra
cjecei5 V\� C hT5 1 Vvvh C'VA �' y`� $lvce o,nA 5 r
Reviewerlinspector Name 1a '
fay
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Sectidh, Facility Assessment Unit i 1/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Healfh and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
,Jonathan B. Hawes, Secretary IDEF.HNF;Z
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
Mr. T.C. Williams
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, North Carolina 28689
SUBJECT: Operation Review Corrective Action Recommendation
T.C. Williams Farm
Facility No. 49-17
IredeIl County
Dear Mr. Williams,
On July 2, an Operation Review was conducted of T. C. Williams Farm, facility no. 49-17. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was = being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and operated under
the responsible charge of a designated operator. However, the following management deficiency was discovered
and noted for corrective action: failure to install start pumping marker within the pond. This management
deficiency needs to be addressed and corrected. You are encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist if
additional assistance is needed. During any ensuing reviews, this same deficiency will be re-examined to determine
if corrective action was implemented.
In order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste CUMgI be
discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems
must be properly maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
Please remember that you are required to obtain and implement an approved animal waste management
plan by the end of this year. The plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information.
Since rel , -
t
p C.ZifinmermanE' onmentaI Engineer I
919 North Main Street, N14W
�C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10°%o pbst-consumer paper

Mr. T.C. Williams
Judy 16, M
Page 2
�r
cc: iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files

State of Nofth Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DNISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 5, 1998
T. C. Williams
Rt. 1 Box 282
Union Grove, NC 28684
Subject: Operator -in -Charge Certification
NCGS 90A-47.2
T.C. Williams Farm, Facility#: 49-17
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
As of January 1, 1998 all facilities must have a certified Operator -In -Charge. A review of
the database does not show this to be the case for your facility. Failure to have a Certified Operator -
in -Charge is a violation of NCGS 90A-47.2.
If you or the designated operator for the facility have not taken and passed the required exam,
an interim certified operator should be obtained. If you have already taken the exam, you may want
to contact Ms. Cindy Dudley of the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification
Commision (WPCSOCC) at 919-733-0026.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
40
D. Rex GIeason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Mcin Street, NAW
r �C FAX 7Q4-C�3-�504Q
Mooresville, North Cordinc 28115 An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 __ __ 500% recycled/Io°a ltcst-consumer paper

-
StaTe oT Norin Carolina
''..
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
"vT
C. Dewey Botts, Director
v41
MEMORANRM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
±&'4
;A
.r
IDEHNR
June 20, 1996
N.C. r)EY°^. (jr
E-N,V��DZ0 M N , r rA!-Ti1.,
JUL 31 1996
.4`;ijd�:.;�R�
16i1�r;[$'riiLf fiC6;;;�ikL OtiiCr
Larr trend Iredell District Conservationist
Car olI" i ce, Assistant Director, Technical services
Williams, Dairy Farm Review by .0200 Guidance Committee
Representatives of the Guidance Committee visited the Williams' Dairy
and reviewed the plan prepared by MRCS and District staff. The issue in
question is a means to handle runoff from a 0.3 acre paved area. The proposed
design provides for a 2 inch concrete lip at the lot edge over which flow will
be directed into a 15 foot wide by 1200 foot long grass filter area that
drains into a farm pond.
The Guidance Committee does not consider the waterway alternate as a
de minimus discharge. We recommend replacing the curb that is broken and
collecting the runoff and piping to the waste storage pond. The roof should
be guttered to minimize the excess fresh water being stored in the waste
storage pond. Once this is done the farm pond could be cleaned out and used
.as a source of drinking water for the dairy animals on the farm.
CP/tl
CC. Guidance Committee Members
.:�
Ak
" '. �°
Te,
�. OL—C
P.O. Box 27687. ,Paleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Fa a :;coortunay Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
x:

State of North Carolina bLtv-
Department of Environment,
WAA
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary EDIEHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
T. C, Williams
Rt. 1 Box 282
Union Grove, NC 28684
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
T.C. Williams Farm, Facility#: 49-17
Iredeil County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan, For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, 4PW FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 �� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 _ 500% recycled/100/e post -consumer paper

1 I Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D.le$30
Water Quali egional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
AV
E3EEHNF;Z
N.C. DEPT, OF
T.C. Williams ENtrrrzc7rvNIEN'r, Nr?
T.0 Williams Farm NATUIZAL
139 Burke Faun Loop
Union Grove NC 28684 DEC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: T.0 Williams Farm r'V'SlOn OF FIiVIIIiIIJfVIl Pl
Facility ID #: 49-17 MFlRLSVIW RIMNAl OFFICE
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Batty Huneycutt at 9I91733-0026.
Sincerely,
�j�
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files AW
Water Pollution Control System W 4 Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certilication Commission NVf CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

State of NOFTn Carolina
Department of 'Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
C. Dewey Botts, Director
4 • Y1F
E) FE FZI
June 20, 1996
N.C. DEPT. 0jr
ENVIRONM NT. H A1,Tf4,
I NATURAL RESOURCE
JUL 31 1996
M>1MoBArrrnUM
DIVISION DE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGUEN1
TO: Larr end'' , lredell District Conservationist MOSRESME REGIONAL OFFICE
FROM: Car 01�" i ce, Assistant Director, Technical Services
SUBJECT: Williams' Dairy Farm Review by .0200 Guidance Committee
Representatives of the Guidance Committee visited the Williams' hairy
and reviewed the plan prepared by MRCS and District staff. The issue in
question is a means to handle runoff from a 0.3 acre paved area. The proposed
design provides for a 2 inch concrete lip at the lot edge over which flow will
be directed into a 15 foot wide by 1200 foot long grass filter area that
drains into a farm pond.
The Guidance Committee does not consider the waterway alternate as a
de minimus discharge. We recommend replacing the curb that is broken and
collecting the runoff and piping to the waste storage pond. The roof should
be guttered to minimize the excess fresh water being stored in the waste
storage pond. Once this is done the farm pond could be cleaned out and used
as a source of drinking water for the dairy animals on the farm.
CP/tl
cc: Guidance Committee Members
P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Eaua' ;Joportun;ty Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: —
Facility No. -IL r 7
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: S )A, 1995
Time: Ix :'30 101
Farm Name/Owner:_ I - G�
Mailing Address: l 3q B u v' 4 4rri l c C4 64�r C1_rove
County:. -5- o eclell Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: -IT- WrlArK5 Phone:
Physical Address/Location: dJG(✓►"`e~ of
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_CattleZDesign Capacity L-ONumber of Animals on Site:_.
Latitude: °®f Z�" Longitude: g) ° oo ' 0 p" Elevation: i 9,22Feet
Circle Yes or 0
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) `Yes or No Actual Freeboard: L Ft. 3 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or ii�o Was any erosion observed? Yes or IQ
Is adequate land available for spray? fe br No Is the cover crop adequate? �or No
Crop(s) being utilized; %/ head
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings(ia or No
100 Feet from Wells? (9or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or 1D
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or 1
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or10 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
2
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Inspector NamSignature GM11
A__
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

V
NORTH CAROLINA 'DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL. OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 13, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
T. C. Williams
Burke Farm Loop Rd.
Union Grove, NC 28684
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
T.C. Williams Farm, Facility#: 49-17
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Williams:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 14, 1998 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. A Notice of Violation (NOV) is being issued for the
discharge leaving the paved area where the heifers are housed at the old facility. The
old material (silage/manure/hay) should be removed and the paved area kept clean.
The noted discharge is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a), in
light of your deemed permitted status.
In addition to the noted violation, the dead calf observed in the drainage ditch
below the old facility should be disposed of in a proper manner. Also, the sludge
dredged from your storage pond should be land applied as soon as possible. For
technical assistance please contact your local Soil and Water District representative.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by March 15,
1998 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problems. Upon receiving your
response a follow up review will be performed.
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOR E9VILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FA% 704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCk.EB/10% POfST-CONSUMER PAPER

Page Two
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704)
663-1699.
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
Barbara Christian, P.G.
Acting Regional Supervisor

N
U
T. C. Williams Farm Inc.
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28689-9205
Facility No. 49-17
Iredell County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
200 Milk Cows
35 Dry Cows
80 Heifers
85 Calves
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
January 31, 2003
{0 1 1

Farm Location Map
T. C. Williams Farm 1ryc.
Facility No. 49-17
Cp R 1802
I �� Pa000CK RD Rp TAP R10GEt.1N R0
yA1 9AIYOR�1N f 1508 180@ 7r
�J$'�a 'K
CA0,CWAf IN. LUNSFURD �f J
�— ' � r r� I �1�-,eae �r •�P• I
PICKER
. .. w ' �;•' v+ - ppC LLB CR.
1 ,~,10 i 1iFJ DR. [i�krL fi4 /i
i r 04 , r usrHrs oR F
r yl
180: �saUS�r w
oap`s mQ jr..LT 1S M R '�1
[NCRffM V "P 5¢� 1607 r I r
1 g0
CAVE MrIL �� �rJ SQhp sf
i
LlNNEYg QG 9 NFrs c��e 1 599 go ,` ew Hopp
�$ 3 "y7
URK
RAC FIRE UlC
rye Ps/
s87
ram. R: .i is Il S9T
_v——ft4V ILGq BHA 4"��4o� i �9 CK �;4 s
1 y PM
i CMG u 'gyp i5 i6 R S �6 uQARD
� z
f z '
1
p
Q
� (7 9a , a
Cl = ' rpaCBR00x J*sy'
Ny
MOU
GiSIDL
&UNCH Ro "Ate, E XALLEY Q��S
IACiAQW DR D RD `�r��y `�. �� QLaNr<=GRC
RD D GILA TH sra aMM
HIGKQH,LN ¢
SPR'. `^
THEE ~ g°�o� r� N h
RO ip �AclypA
LN?
�Q
x UL r a P Ess `ar'ro a4 TwuNIT c
SPRINGS,
1 � a � �UIQa w JUA fi-4�11
6R E4
Mot. �q 9Q� ISBO -
= LN
rZj ! 8g4pC1'f F,q!?
C) '" i 1 '1620� sw E LA[ r c
/ L NE ME o z
/! PATS; Asbury Zz F o�iY �`1�//� � wpUVt4,k Qa = n a
FARM DIP Mtn
HD M
ISG R CENTER
n
R F4

4

Q Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
T. C Williams Farm Inc.
T. C Willlaams
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove, NC 28689-9205
704-592-2338
01-31-2003
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr., Environmental Spec. II
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ext. 3
�}
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
f'1 procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
�/ waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------------------------------•---------------------------------------------------------------------------g -- --
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 Cover Pa e 1

T. C. Williams
Dairy Map
and Field
Legend
.
Field Number Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irrigated Acres Land Use
Tract 411 Mayberry - Harrington
Map 1
Bottoms
1 22.7
22.7
Cropland
2 9.1
9.1
Cropland
2A 16.3
16.3
Hayland
3 7.0
7.0
Cropland
4 7.2
6.9
Cropland
5 9.0
9.0
Cropland
6 16.5
16.5
Cropland
7 3.3
3.0
Hayland
8 1.3
1,3
Cropland
9 8.6
8.6
Cropland
9A 2.0
2.0
Hayland
10 2.2
2.2
Hayland
Tract 534 Dottie Place
Map 7
1 40.0
38.8
Cropland
Tract 587 Home Farm
Map 3
Irrigation. Map
Map 4
Some Irrigation Pulls extend in to additional fields. Application rates are limited to lowest
PAN of the crops within the pull.
1 2.6
2.6
Hayland
2 10.0
10.0
Pasture
3 22.1
5.0
Pasture
4 20.2
3.0
Pasture
4-1 5.0
5.0
Pasture
4-2 7.9
7.9
Pasture
4-3 5.2
5.2
Pasture
4-4 7.2
7,2
Pasture
4-5 6.7
6.7
Pasture
4-6 6.1
6.1
Pasture
7 16.8
8.6
Pasture
7-1 8.2
8.2
Pasture
8 38.0
15.8
Pasture
8-1 6.2
6.2
Pasture
8-2 6.8
6.8
Pasture
8-3 5.2
5.2
Pasture
Page 1

T. C. Williams
Dairy Map
and Field
Legend
Field Number Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irrigated Acres Land Use
Tract 587 Continued
Map 3
9
19.0
8.1
Pasture
9-1
8.1
8.1
Pasture
9-2
7.3
7.3
Pasture
9-3
6.8
6.8
Pasture
9A
13.0
6.0
Pasture
10
2.0
2.0
Pasture
11
75.0
10.5
Cropland
11-1'
3.0
3.0
Cropland
11-2
2.6
2.6
Cropland
11-3
6.2
6.2
Cropland
11-4
7.3
7.3
Cropland
11-5
6.5
6.5
Cropland
11-6
T 3
7.3
Cropland
11-7
7.3
7.3
Cropland
11-8
8.1
8.1
Cropland
11-9
8.1
8.1
Cropland
11-10
8.1
8.1
Cropland
11 G
5.0
5.0
Hayland
12
2.9
2.9
Hayland
13
2.0
2.0
Cropland
14
24.5'
2.3
Cropland
14-1
8.1
8.1
Cropland
14-2
7.3
7.3
Cropland
14-3
6.8
6.8
Cropland
14G
4.0
4.0
Hayland
15
8.0
8.0
Cropland
16
5.7
5.7
Cropland
Tract 629
Bunny Williams Place
Map 2
1
20.2
19.5
Cropland
Tract 630
Bennie Williams Place
Map 3
1
18.4
18.4
Hayland
2
5.2
5.2
Hayland
Tract 1397
Dickens Place
Map 9
1
38.5
38.5
Cropland
2
17.0
17.0
Cropland
.
2G
1.5
1.5
Hayland
Page 2

T.
C. Williams
Dairy Map and Field
Legend
• Field_ Number Total Acres
Broadcast Acres Irrigated Acres Land Use
Tract 1415
Reid Place
Map 6
1
20.5
19.8
Cropland
2
7.6
7.3
Cropland
Tract 1416 Margaret Welborn Place Map 5
1
1.6
1.6
Cropland
2
5.4
5 A
Cropland
Tract 1417
Coytt Williams Place
Map 5
1
4.5
4.5
Cropland
2
2.7
2.7
Cropland
3
7.2
7.2
Cropland
4
1.6
1.6
Cropland
Tract 5842
Speaks Place
Map 8
1
36.0
35.7
Cropland
r-j
L-J
•
Page 3

k' 74
IN
��r "'kt. � �� '' a,pr"i� �`�C • 4rrSV "t§ .�
• i� � 3 T�' S 7 A x k
d ., �' w :.' F " y. _ .jiy f �yaY, 4 1 y�Vy'"1 • ..
a
t «+
WIL
rp uw c^ t
_ �� � ,r �.:. a +.r.• � ''!�� �s',a„ r v-' '`l � 'b����raa R r rqy`,,. rj
�Y'"u r��`" x1 �.f - #, ":Yn� V�. 4 , a � ■,1+:+'�J�r? �^ 9 �. +� s
r ,� • f Ih rr �,.n . +�
h'y ,� `fit'.. Y^"�'-• "'� 'wr � w -'! �4��'����rasv.�}. �v �! r;k• J{ ..
$ V R
_
L� 9r r r v
. �.: `1 ,4 P" YL Wyh w.: s•,,��yy�.. � �A JI
lol
yyqq y�j" ar. .A "I 't� a 2 r""�r�,�.}•Tg c ,i! y � ti� r� i � I �.;f
a'KrF`'•�'T 11
c` r
a� •' r•r�-�ry b4'Y ei.. - , tP ". _,. ����.' n.F .. .. �� �f �6
j^' 3 �� } } a � a I tc� ;?1 t� t ,. . a+Y sF•
:
i
�T� •: � ry � p' { '.i ri�x. �1'r �' • IS y`I' ��'.,.�'T
irr.
�y
1} • '' F � � �r � t �i '' Y. fit. r'.',+r� �.'+ ,
i r
f
Iu
U"P,,{ t'� ., �J Jr+• .f ( ; 4 1 `
1 r ..:�t ' 1 �. 1. �_ c •* �Rda ,r� ,(;+'bf x .r l �,3
F
l .
D
ICI
1
�
O
wFlaP,!I)s
.,t
if
U.
id{dYurk,•/
/ �r

, n
E
_ ,�` " +� }• ,a 1, �.�,�g�f
A,- �"5 w � �z ,.� 1.E �,q►f I RC'il �'tE,� ��w�'..•� ,��t '� r ��.
x • � �r'�,�F- { � �.�� �f�. Illy �� Q�h� w ..
1 r -
A ` •y5 ' - �r •»ice _ t,� i� ��' .�y�,
JJ :, s r � w�d.A ,�k 5�• }
• 1"l� '"fir +� fir`.
`� � ✓•,.� ', 4101
\
Aft
i
, r
` F M
��. J ,jd �' �� 7, �}1 My+# r* _. i r�1 x tea! 's�,�r t�Y�.. .' iw a ` .x• -t
'" y'1 0l •jyi��! �' Y 1
J� y,
c �,..
A I
7
4
' �• t T r ' t} x v r� _ 1
-

r
4-5 4-C
4-2 �%4
j/ I , Field 3
7-1
1
1
Field 7
I I 1 ! ! 8-3 *`�`♦ !
1 ! %,`I !
Field S
y !
8-2 -
iJ `�♦
9-3
9-1 <� 9-2
¢---——— — — — —-- --*14-I
Field 14 ,y Field 15
-
--—— ------ 114-3
T3R,�, E3 A76 ARE TO EEE LaATM RT
EYERT DffM IN PI'E iiI MOM
(TEES. E AM, ORM am PM.
EfiMVM. WAM fm Do Dn.)
TB ■ TPidSi Rt70L5
PIPE lEbi UEN WIN is M BE 2r-C ,
TRDO, tEgM is TC BE 24"
PFE L CP.3EM MM PON
2we PVC.
Tki-ACTLA VfE_VE 15 R PP_SS"
RR iE .0 i1'D VR7" W--k'
i
Irrigation Map
T. C. Williams Farm Inc.
Facility No. 49-17
T. C. Williams Dairy
= Burke Farm Loup
Union Groves NC Zw"
Pile key
s� r PAIR r- i-Nd Mr P*w
r Pit 1 % PC Pp
Sprinlr]eer / Valve key
� j Try b. Lamm� m r Ali,.... Pie.
?V, ho-w. : Rr Pews Ve" a,
r`''.. Wit} Tres-1.4.. V." r
wflv s.VpW
1 \ \
Gra—Mae Distributing Co.
i \
l
2310 NC HVY. a01 N
\
\
\ I1-7
Moekav lle, NC 27028
1 I-9
PIlcne 910-99Ei-3232
Fax [phone]U
Designed by: JLwn Graham
ID-8-BB
Scale: i" - 600,1Design N. iZ8

��, � rt a r-1.':�;�, r'�....- ; �g�,�`�• .'! _ a .� ,.;.� ,h •I_�. f `- t' N`.j �t�. t�i -'4 fd9 ��,,:4 "'f -
��,
�SA t .� r , t{. , t ` f M : � 1 «.Y e'r � . f `� n ` r V f Ilpyy y t C. � �"" 1�•,
� z 5 ��.�:ly x a.. d t '� i ;, • , r�'Fs,)P +leab I �a IS I _ 1
:All -
it.
,r1 in
✓ham q 4�. I;� • � , S � _ t, �' 4 r r Ay.
rr ,
I Kt1"1 Ft K• +1 r �r
r�
dddd �r,
- v
` I
, �1
�*
I'- 4
�,+.r � r ., 1 eF -,(• ti.;+°✓ r, �llla'x •Ys�x' �r� ` J� x �.
F: i Ir•' R •
-
SPI
eA
.
All
+,4
"f'lu - �+ 1 Fr "•A' ,Y #�II �Y? �r�i�. � � 'r��a r� �1" h.J.
'� ` i• �•d i�i. '7 � A 5'...e �� �•
04
+ � ?���, led I `' � . � � � •t � � r I� � J�ItI �
f}
C p
d
r
d .+,• �, � �_'f „{T5) �.{� Jll ,; !f p rl•k �`�r �" ,� xdr Vy j ;r #fM�,;:�. •r�'ry;
1'. M:� '•`N �•i �'.'p1 � l+!.a.: y .i!i ,�g'�,1 ,4ir1�+ ��,j,:.•� y 9�,r ����7 �I,v�.. l: �_9. ln,�..,�. 5 7 ,� ;1 �y� yn,•�ljf�, !^' d'N.
1 ' �' - rr�., �.-F 4te i+ a� �� i I'I' "d, � ��• IV't6 �!!`�.
A
t• , d lK {add � •� :_ t I RI s ' ° ':a II
r
r
• �r
tR
• II—
_ - _iT ,.�{ Y yT %�l ,a•e t •:lt •ICE" \ S -
M+..•q'',"''hhyf� 3 � � -� yy ,aasa�.�� 7� �',nri`r^ ; �..� '� k �dd�.� a i� r�' `�,
;�, ,g� h�hAy k r� �� �f"�'�� ,�yY". 1. V'.i r ��'�✓�. � Y.'_ r 114 ,rpy r J'��1 1.

�yIJ x z+• „ Sj.. '�- i'. ri `ir '1 i1,¢R �Itp -
}Qt
! t a i
`�
w ''! I I.i } per } •�t a � t �� _,1 ���L± .��5 �YS � •
� �. 4N� � i4� � f•° 1 ":4ti,`d�A y�. S� 1 � dla' ��• Cr° �h
� �•g�.�rti. � 1 ! { ; 4 �a as � ���' �� a 1 ' Pa LC 1;. s F4 . �, f i i'�.
1� �Mn l S R ����r .� �j t it .S: p• _ i � w i
4 -1z
�' a_'" � } Y�d � .W rl 1,16# .7 : C 7{, 4 't4 F d '..� •'w
Tract 1415
Reid
1 i� V�. •"yip {pyi� ��� s�®5`ei��� �4�'.. i l� ''' li yl. 1 ;
a. '�A. q% '.,tick — {'Rr p .. i.. .. •, �. ^S�9i
: _
"
-
Place
` i{

7"Williams Farm Inc.'rl
Facility
'
�'�F., .;.� <�'��nyci Y � 1-f�/�f y �} k, 'y+. l��q � i t •J �,Y �.'�4 49-17
p'1?+. 7i ' wh c J r � rt � 1 � }i:L,4•� �- � r
t+, �4. � �r4 � �r s'._ I,J+-+�° � � � �. �s' Sa �1�i,., � �A .` 5•�r'�ar„r�l'•�tir%aNr r Y.
'i+• { '}D �h�M �,�'" is - � t 5 4
' m a
. •-' a.� _ .V.k /y� �i�., V tis� i }�4,k'y+f aft, a t
4l —
p
�H
a•}ro �, _ .;y,,,• a F Y y hi rLr ~ 5'r, ��w .,,39w
eO�
+i. l+r�'9�rm�� '^ z 1A++o �+`x fry ! •°'kka'�� y{r♦ +'�.:{.
��� �`rw �� •'`�}� n �.r � �7.... .114� ���s '�'� * F�•r '}`�4-s. �+Y1Y ,� _1�r( 's �"�u y,
A��� x 4 � 4 ,v �. £-✓� t'�ti'v a �' t �+,���, a
� . r� a °_d ytL:. v R •c y. �` t ���P� p s ,.. � '" 'V S �-= , r
F X 4 : �, -. S eeyy ,� k:. 'ram J '� ��y, " . �+, d ♦�J'�f�a gr
*�`� � r. Fs � `�.�* F '�1'� � t � ,..� `4•-,r i��r�� I•��'x. - -�'f yi.% M s
i
4f4�.i1 °+'fir"!
�. 5�r'$�G of J•r,.>,. _ _� �, S.r .v
f �
ti *;+ •7
n _
k yfj,
y,
K
i
4 in ,.
A �' ra.' 9 r •'
If
-
� r ' � f r�+� «4� � ;, �•� tip;`
.. - z •.� � � fir...:
D r sr
A

4 s '
y rk
'y`�.:- w'#�,• 4� ffi', t 14,. fir...,
19 'ert
, 4
' 4
Al
. ti yew •�,
9 S
" 1: ,x 1. •d ti:.
h s w 1 #
R �
` i .s ��`ro^. ''� yam. -ice' }\. aPY` r4 •'. � �`,.•
1 �� '- k \ 1 i r�l ,ga ,.;•-�, fie.
,o-� {� A '' � ■ +' Ste'

Feld Location
Ma
5.
Williams
lliams
Facility
Farm Inc. .;
No, 49-17 �
w
'
17,
#:
r.�-
;
- !�
•� -, tit ,,
'
��'
�
_
�-�-_y�.
.,ram- � `
H,- . • r
I
'
�'r d-ram
��t
�'
I
•
r
�
vr
i
1, *rr
"ft `
A
3Q 7
38,,E
-
4y5
1.
k
I
•
I
Sol
Aim
f.
0

Narrative
THE T. C. WILLIAMS FARM INC.
This farm is managed by T. C. Williams and son, Charlie Williams. A 200 head Milking herd and
additonal 200 head of dry cows, heifers and calves are managed on this farm. All dairy waste and
contaminated runoff is collected as a slurry and spread by irrigation on adjoining pasture and cropland
or as a solid and spread of more distant crops and hayland.
CROP NOTES
The Waste Utilization Table in this plan has two sections, Section 1 for the normal crops grown on
the farm and Section 2 for alternate crops grown, as part of grass renovation program or grown, for
weed control or to balance the feed crops around the farm operation.
Some irrigation pulls cross more that one field and in some cases more than one crop. Waste
application is limited to the lowest Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) of the crops covered.
The Plant Avialable Nitrogen (PAN) for crops following soybeans must be reduced by 20 lbs. to
allow for carry over of Nitrogen in the soil.
If corn is planted for silage, but is not needed and harvested as grain the PAN uitilized by the crop
must be reduced by 45%to adjust for the forage not harvested.
If Small Grains planted for silage, but is not needed and harvested as grain, the utilization is similar
and not adjustment is needed.
Annual soil samples will be collected and tested each year on all fields that animal waste is applied.
It is important to get representative samples in the root zone to monitor of the possible buildup of
phosphorus, zinc and copper.
--------------------------------•------------------------------------------------------------ .---- -g
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 2

Narrative
Animal Waste Sources
Some Dairy Animals included in this section and on the Source Page are included in both
sources due to waste from 35 animals being collected as both slurry and solids.
U1 - TC Williams Dairy Slurry
2,797,000 gals./year of animal waste, wash water, lot runoff and contaminated rainfall are collected
from 315 confined dairy animals.
This waste source contains 14,175 lbs. of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN).
See the Waste Management System Design By Samuel C. Bingham dated 10/24/97, Section III, A, B, C
and Section VI, C located in the back of this folder for support information.
U2 - TC Williams Dairy Solids
12,529 cu.ft. of Dairy Solids are collected from 120 confined dairy animals x 62 lbs./cu.ft. divided by
2000 lbs./ton = 450.4 tons of Dairy Solids '
This waste source contains 1,936 lbs. of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
See the Waste Management System Design by Samuel C. Bingham dated 10/24/97, Section VI, A
and C located in the back of this folder for support imformation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
333062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 Narrative Page 2 of 2

0 0 0
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the numbs- of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being brown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be
used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field
Section 1- Normal Crops Grown - Corn, Small Grains, Hay and Pasture
See Crop Notes for Additional Information
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Snit Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
C
RYF.
Applec,
Pariod
Naropot
PA
Nutrient
Raq'd
Comm
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
Rea
(NIA)
AppieC
Method
Mature
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid 1
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
11s/A
lOW
t!pdA
tatx
I(H)O gals
[tilts
1397
1
U2
Madison
38.50
38.50
8-11 Grain, Silage111ay
7.7'I'wu
9/1-3/31
85
0
0
Bwad.
85
0.00
20
0.00
761.03
1397
1
U2
Madism
39.50
38.50
Can, Silage
17.0 Tans
V15-6/30
185
0
0
Broad.
185
0.00
43
0.00
1,656.37
1397
2
U2
Caul
17.00
17.00
Small Grain, SilagFdllay
8.81'ons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
98
0.00
23
0.00
397.44
1397
2
112
Cecil
MOO
- 17.00
Com, Silage
19.4 Tuns
2115-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
47
0.00
794.64
1397
20
U2
Caul
1.50
1.50
Fescue Hay
4.0'rata
911-7/31
178
0
0
Broad
178
0.00
41
O.UO
62.09
t415
1
U2
Cecil
20.50
19.80
Smell Grain, Silagoillay
9.4'fons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Broad
RA
00)
24
0.00
478.88
1415
1
U2
Cecil
20.50
19.80
Can, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/1S-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
O.W
50
0.0(1
980.78
14131
2
132
Chewacla-P
1 7.60
7.30
Small Grain, Silagelllay
*9.0 Tans
9/1-3131
•95
0
0
Broad
95
0.00
22
0.00
161.28
1415
2
U2
Chewacla-P
7.60
7.30
Cum, Silage
28.0 Tans
2/15-6/30
1 291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
68
0.00
494.02
1416
1
U2
Chewacla-P
1 1.60
1.60
Small Grain, SilagaMay
'9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
1 .93
0
0
Broad
95
0.00
22
0.00
35,35
----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUT Page 1

WaetP 1 ltili7atinn TAIP.
VPar 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE I
Applic.
Period
Nitrom
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
ComrrL
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(IWA)
Applie,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gaVA I
tans
1000 pals
tons
1416
1
t12
Chewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage
28.01'ons
2115-6/30
291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
68
0.00
108.28
1416
2
112
Buncombe
5.40
5.40
Small Grain, SilageJHay
5.0 Tons
9/1-3131
56
0
0
Broad
56
0.00
13
0.00
70.32
1416
2
U2
Buncombe
5,40
5.40Com,Silage
10.0 Tons
2/15.6130
109
0
0
Broad
109
0.00
25
0.00
136.88
1417
1
U2
Cangprue
4.50
4.501
Small Crain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Broad
111
0.00
26
0.00
116.16
1417
1
U2
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/ 15-6/30
305
0
0
Broad
305
0.00
71
.0.00
319.18
1417
2
U2
Cecil
2.70
2.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 ions
9/ 1-3/31
94
0
0
Broad
1 94
0.00
22
0.00
59.02
1417
2
U2
Cecil
2.70
2.70
Com, Silage
17.7 Tons
2115.6/30
193
0
0
Broad
193
0.00
45
0.00
121.18
1417
3
U2
Congaree
7.20
7.20
Small Grain, Silagetilay
10.0 Tons
9/1-3131
111
0
0
Broad
111
0.00
26
0.00
185.86
1417
3
U2
Congaree
7.20
7.20
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15- /30
305
0
0
Broad.
305
0.00
71
0.00
510.69
1417
4
U2
Chewacla-P
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage(Hay
•9.0 Tans
9/1-3/31
')3
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
22
0.00
35.35
1417
4
U2
Chewada-P
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad
291
0.00
68
0.00
108.28
411
1
U2
Riverview-P
22.70
22.70
Small Grain, Silage(llay
9.0 Tits
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad
100
0.00
23
0.00
527.90
411
1
U2
Riverview-P
22.70
22.70
Com, Silage
22.0 Tans
2115-6130
240
0
0
Broad
240
0.00
56
0.00
1,266.%
411
2
U2
Braddock-P
9.10
9,10
Small Grain, Silage113ay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
25
0.00
226.44
411
2
L12
Braddo&-P
9.10
9.10
Com, Silage
14.4 Tons
V15-6/30
157
0
0
Broad
157
0.00
37
0.00
332.25
411
2A
U2
Riverview-P
16.30
16.30
Fescue Hay
4.5 Tans
811-7/3)
200
0
0
Broad
j 200
0.00
47
0.00
758.13
411
3
U2
Riverview-P
7.00
7.00
Small Grain, Silage/llay
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
100
0.00
23
0.00
162.79
411
3
112
1 Riverview-P
7.00
7.00
Com, Silage
22.01'ons
2115-6130
240
0
0
Broad
240
0.00
56
0.00
390.69
411
4
U2
I Riverview-P
7.20
6.90
Small Gram, SilaErJHay
9.01'ons
9/1-3/31
l00
0
0
Broad
100
0.00
23
0.00
160.46
411
4
U2
Riverview-P
7.20
6.M
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
2115-6/30
240
0
0
Broad
240
O.()0
56
0.00
385.11
411
5
U2
Riverview-P
9.00
9.60
small Gram, SilageJHsy
9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
100
0
0
Broad
100
0.00
23
0.00
209.30
411
5
UZ
lRiverview-P
9.00
9.00
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
2/ 15.6130
1 240
0
0
Broad,
240
0.00
56
0.00
502.32
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUT Page 2

0 0 0
Waste i ltili7atinn Tahle
VeAr i
Trod
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
d
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogr n
PA
Nutrient
Rafd
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic
Mdhod
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
ppUA
tans
1000 pals
tons
411
6
U2
Chewacla-P
16.50
1630
Small Grain, Silaga/Hay
'9.0 Tons
9/1 3/31
*95
0
0
Broad
95
0.00
22
0.00
364.53
411
6
U2
Chewacta-P
16.50
16.50
Cam, Silage
28.0 Tons
2115-6/30
291
0
0
Broad
291
0.00
68
0.00
1,116.61
411
7
U2
Braddodo-P
3.30
3.00
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
204
0
0
Broad
204
0.00
47
0.00
142.32
411
8
U2
Riverview-P
1.301
1,30
8.11 Grain, SilageJUsy
9.0 Tars
9/1-3131
1001
0
0
Broad
1001
0.00
23
0.00
30.23
411
8
U2
Rivaview-P
1.30
1.30
Com, Silage
22.0 Tana
2/15-6/30
240
0
0
Broad
240
0.00
56
0.00
72.56
411
9
U2
Riverview-P
8.60
8.60
Small Grain, Sila&dHay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
100
0
0
Broad
100
0.00
23
0,00
200.00
411
9
U2
Riverview-P
8.60
8.60
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
240
0
Q
Broad
240
0.00
56
0.00
479.99
4111
9A
U2
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tans
8/1-7131
204
0
0
Broad
204
0.00
47
0.00
94.99
411
10
U2
Braddock-P
2.20
2.20
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
204
0
0
Broad
204
0.00
47
0.00
104.37
534
1
U2
Cecil
40.00
38.80
Small Grain, Silagp(Hay
9.6 Tans
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
25
0.00
965.47
534
I
U2
Cecil
40.00
38.80
Corn, Silage
20.0Tuns
2/15.6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
51
0.00
1,967.04
5842
l
U2
Cecil
36.00
35.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tans
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad
104
0.00
24
0,00
863.43
5842
1
U2
Cecil
36.00
35.70
Com, Silage
19.5 Tans
2/15fi/30
213
0
0
Broad
213
0.00
50
0.00
1,768.37
587
1
U2
Cecil
2.60
2,00
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
811-7131
186
0
0
Broad
196
0.00
43
0.00
86.51
587
2
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
1 Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tars
811-7131
140
0
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
0.00
325.58
587
3
U2
Coil
22.10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
0.00
162.79
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tans
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
0.00
97.67
587
4-1
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/I-7/31
140
0
0
Irrig.
140
26.91
0
134.57
0.00
587
4-2
Ul
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Fescue Pasture
4.2Tons
8/1-7131
140
0
0
Irrix
140
26.91
0
212.62
0.00
587
4-3
U1
Cecil
5.20
5,20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7131
140
0
0
Irrip,
1 140
26.91
0
139.95
0.00
587
4-4
Ul
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tars
8/1-7131
140
0
0
Irrix
140
26.91
01
193.78
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil
6.70
6.70
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
I IUI-7131
140
0
0
)rrig,
140
26.91
0
180.32
0.00
-•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUI' Page 3

� a a
Waste 'li tion Tabi
Traci 1
Field
Source
J.D.
Soil Series
s
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogpi
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fort.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N I
N
IWA
1000
gal/A
tans
1000 NPIS
tons
587
4-6
UI
Cecil
6.10
6.10
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Torts
911-7/31
140
0
0
Irrip,
140
26.91
0
164.17
0.00
587
7
U2
Cecil
16.90
9.60
Fescue Pasture
4.01'ons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad
133
0.00
31
0.00
266.00
587
7-1
UI
Cecil
8.20
8.20
F-ae Pasture
4.0 Tons
9/1-7/3I
133
0
0
Imp,
133
25.57
0
209.66
0.00
587
8
112
Cecil
39.00
15.80
Fomaue Pasture
4.0'rons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad
1331
0.00
31
0.00
488.69
587
8-1
UI
cow
6.20
610
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
9/1-7131
140
0
0
hrix
140
26.91
0
166.86
0.00
587
8-2
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/3)
140
0
0
Irriv,
140
26.91
0
183.01
0.00
587
8-3
U1
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7131
lop
0
0
Imp,
140
26.91
0
139.95
0.00
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tans
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad
133
0.00
31
0.00
250.53
587
9-1
Ui
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
133
0
0
Imp,
133
25.57
0
207.10
0.00
587
9-2
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Irrig-
153
29.41
0
214.71
0.00
587
9-3
U1
Cecil
6.80
6.80
FemcuePasture
4.0'1'ons
8/1-7/31
I33
0
0
Irrif,
133
25.57
0
173.86
0.00
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Femme Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
0
0
Broad.
127
0.00
30
0.00
177.21
587
10
U2
Congaree
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
$11-7/31
166
0
0
Broad-
166
0.00
39
0.00
77.21
587
11
U2
Cecil
75,00
10.50
Small Gram, SilaOl lay
8.81'ans
911-3/31
98
0
0
Broad,
98
0.00
23
0.00
239.30
587
11
112
Cecil
75.00
10.50
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
2115-6/30
201
0
0
Broad
201
0.00
47
0.00
490.81
Ul
Codl
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, SilagR/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irri�
IU4
19.99
0
59.98
O.Op
1
Ul
Cecil
3.Op
3.Op
Cam, Silage
19-5 Tans
2/1S 6/30
213
0
0
IrriR,
213
40.95
p
1ZZ.84
0.00
Ml
2
UI
Cecil
2.60
2.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
brig,
104
19.99
0
51.99
0.00
-2
Ul
Cecil
2.60
2.60Com,
Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrix
213
40.95
p
106.46
0.00
- 3
U1
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
IrriR.
104
19.99
0
123.96
0.00
587
11- 3
U 1
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
2115-6/30
213
0
0
Irrif;
213
40.95
0
253.87
0.00
587
11- 4
U1
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/L 3131
t 44
0
0
Irril�
104
19.99
0
145.95
0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUf Page 4

a � �
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Traa
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
a
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogm
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fat.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
IWA
1000
gal/A.
tons
1000 MIS
tons
587
11- 4
U 1
Call
7.30
730
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2115-6/30
213
0
0
Irrip,
213
40.95
0
298.91
0.00
587
11- 5
U1
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrig.
104
19.99
0
129.95
0.00
587
11- 5
Ul
Cecil
6.30
6.50
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
brig.
213
40.95
01
266.16
0.00
587
11-6
IJI
Cecil
7.30
7-301
S.11Grain, Sil.SaHay
9-4Tons9/1-3/31
104
0
0
irriG
104
19.99
0
145.95
0.00
587
11-6
UL
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Conn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrip-
213
40.95
0
298.91
0.00
587
11- 7
Ul
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, SilagdHay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
0
Irrip,
104
19.99
0
145.95
0.00
587
11-7
U1
Cecii
7.30
7.30
Corn, Silage
19.5'r'ons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
IErip,
213
40.95
0
298.91
0.00
587
11- 8
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrip,
104
19.99
0
161.94
0.00
587
11- 8
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Cum, Silage
19.5 Tons
2115.630
2I3
0
0
Imp,
213
40.95
0
331.67
0.00
587
11- 9
1.11
C4361
8.10
8.10
Small Grainy Silage/Hay
9.4 Tans
911-3/31
104
0
D
Irrip,
104
19.99
0
161.94
0.00
587
11-9
Ul
Caii
8.10
8.10
Com, Silage
19.5 Tom
2115-6/30
213
0
0
Irrig,
213
40.95
0
331.67
0.00
587
11-10
UI
Cecil
8.10
8.t0
Small Grain, Silage/1-lay
9.4 Tans
911-3/31
104
0
0
brig.
104
19.99
0
161.94
0.00
587
I1-10
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
19.5'fons
2115-6/30
213
0
0
lain,,
213
40.95
0
331.67
0.00
587
IIG
U2
Cmil
5.00
5.00
FesareHay
4.0Tons
WI-7131
178
0
0
Broad.
178
0.00
41
0.00
206.97
587
12
U2
Cecil
2.90
2.90
Fesme flay
4.4'fons
9/1-7/31
195
0
0
Broad,
195
0.00
45
0.40
131.51
587
13
U2
Cell
2.00
2.00
Small Gam, Silagelllay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad,
107
0.00
25
0.00
49.77
587
13
LJ2
Cavil
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tans
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
51
0.00
101.39
587
14
U2
Cecl
24.50
2.30
Small Grain, SilaWlay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
24
0.00
55.63
587
14
U2
Cavil
24.50
2.30
Com, Silage
19.5 Tans
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
50
0.00
113.93
587
14-1
U1
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrip,
104
19.99
0
161.94
0.00
587
14-1
Ul
Cecil
9.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tans
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrip,
213
40.95
0
331.671
0.00
587
14-2
U1
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, SilagP(Hay
9.4 Tans
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Irrip,
104
19.99
0
145.95
0.00
-----•--------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: I/31/03 WUT Page 5

Waste Utili tionTable
Tray
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
c
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
C
RYE
Applies
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
NI
16s/A
1000
RuUA
tons
1000 gals
tans
587
14-2
U1
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tans
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrig,
213
40.95
0
298.91
0.00
587
14-3
Ui
Cec l
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, SilagcJliay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
1fiR,
104
19.99
0
135.95
0.00
587
14-3
Ul
Cecil
6.90
6.80
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tans
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Irrix
213
40.95
0
278.44
0.00
587
140
L12
Madison
4.00
4.00
Fescue Ilay
3.1 Tans
8/1-7/31
138
0
0
Broad.
138
U.00
32
0.00
129.37
587
15
U2
Chewacla-P
8.00
8.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
•9.0 Tans
911-3/31
•95
0
0
Bid,
95
0.00
22
0.00
176.74
587
15
U2
Chewacla-P
8.00
8.00
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
29l
0
0
Broad,
29)
0.00
68
0.00
54139
587
16
U2
Chewacla-P
5.70
5.70
Smaii Grain, SitsoHay
'9-0 Tons
9/13/31
-95
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
22
0.00
125.93
587
16
U2
Chewacia-P
5.70
5.70
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tans
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad
291
0.00
68
0.00
385.74
629
1
U2
Cecil
20.20
19-50
Small Grain, SilagdHay
9.4 Tans
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad
104
0.00
24
0.00
471.62
629
1
L12
Cedl
20.20
19.50
Corn, Silage
19-5 Teas
2115-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
50
0.00
965.92
-630
1
U2
Cecil
18.40
18.40
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tans
9/1-7/31
178
0
0
Broad
178
0.00
41
0.00
761.66
-630
2
L12
Coral
5.20
5.20
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
9/1-7131
195
U
1 0
Broad.
195
0.00
45
0.00
235.81
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
7,604.06
Liquid Manure'
Total Produoad, 1000 gallons
2,797.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
-4,807.06
Total Applied, tuns
27,799.91
Manure Solids
Total Produced, torts
450.36
Balance, tons
-27,339.55
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol - means Izaserl, otherwise, owned 2. Symbol • means user entered data.
-------- ---- ------------- --- --- --------- ---- ---- -- -------- -- --- ---- - -- ---- ------------ -----------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1131103 WUT Pame 6

a
o a
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
11�
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be
used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be gown Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field
Section 2 - Alternate Crops Grown - Soybeans and Pasture/Hayland Renovation
See Crop Notes for Additional Information
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field I
Source
1.D.
Soil saies
Taal
Acre
Us_
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitmaon
PA
Nutrient
Reined
Comm.
Fat
Nutrient
Applied
Reg
(tWA)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Fuld)
N
N
N I
Ihs/A
1000
P11A
taus
I(1(H) gals
14ars
1397
1
U2
Madison
38.50
38.50
Soybeans, Manured, rAmMe Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
113
0
0
limed.
113
0.00
26
0.t10
1.011.73
1397
2
U2
Cecil
17.00
17.00
Soybeans, Manned, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
132
0
0
Broad,
132
0.00
31
0.00
521.85
1415
1
U2
Cecl
20.50
19.80
Soybeans, Manned, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0,00
33
0-00
644.64
1415
2
112
C'hcwsela-P
7.601
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
.0
0
Broad
177
0.(N)
41
0.(H)
300.48
1416
1
112
Chewafia-P
1.60
1.60
soybeans, Matured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9/15
177
0
0
Broad
177
0.00
41
0.0()
65.86
1416
2
112
Bunamebe
5.40
5.40
Soybeans, ManurA Double Crop
21 hu.
4/1-9/15
82
0
0
Broad
82
0.00
19
0.00
102.98
1417
1
112
Congaree
4.50
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9115
179
0
0
Broad.
179
0.00
42
0.00
187.32
14171
2
U2
Cecil
2.70
7.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9115
124
0
0
Broad
124
0.00
29
0.00
77.86
1417
3
U2
Congpree
7.20
7.20
Soybeans, Manurod, Doubly Crap
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Broad,
179
0.00
42
0.00
299.72
1417
4
U2
Chewacla-P
1 I.60
L60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
1 177
0
0
Bnmd
177
0.00
41
0.00
65.86
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUT Page I

o o 0
Wactp 1 l ili7atinn Tnhh-
Vpar 1
Tra1
Field
SouF'2
I.D.
Sail Series
4
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogm
PA
Nutnart
Req'd
Comm
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Appiec
Mcdhod
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 Is
tons
all
1
U2
Rive view-P
22.70
22.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
38 bu.
411-9115
148
0
0
Broad
148
0.00
34
0.00
781.29
411
2
U2
Braddock-P
9.10
9.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu,
411-9/15
117
0
0
Broad
117
0.00
27
0.00
247.60
411
2A
U2
Riverview-P
16.30
16.30
Small Grain, SilagPfHay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
20
Broad
80
0.00
19
0.00
303.25
411
2A
U2
I Riv rview-P
16.30
16.30
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9115
148
0
0
Broad
148
0.00
34
0.00
561.01
411
3
U2
Riverview-P
7.00
7.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411-9/15
148
0
0
Broad
148
0.00
34
0.00
240.93
411
4
U2
Riverview-P
7.20
6.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu-
4/1-9115
1 148
0
0
Broad
1 148
0.00
34
0.00
237.48
411
5
U2
Riverview-P
9.00
9.00
Soybeans, Manurad, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad
148
0.00
34
0.00
309.76
411
6
U2
Chewacla-P
16.50
16.50
SoybeuL% Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/19/15
177
0
0
Broad
177
0.00
41
0.001
679.18
411
7
U2
Braddock-P
3.30
3.00
Small Gram, Sdage/Hay
9.2 Tans
9/1-3/31
102
0
20
Broad
82
0.00
19
0.00
57.21
4111
7
U2
Braddock-P
3.30
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4)1-9115
113
0
0
Broad
113
0.00
26
0.00
78.94
411
S
U2
Riverview-P
1.30
1.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411-9115
148
0
0
Broad
148
0.00
34
0.00
44.74
411
9
U2
Riverview-P
9.60
9.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad
148
0.00
34
0.00
296.00
411
9A
U2
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage(Hay
9.2 Tom
9/1-3/31
102
0
20
Broad
82
0.00
19
0.00
39.14
411
9A
U2
Braddock-P
2.00
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
113
0
0
Broad
113
0.00
26
0.00
52.56
4111
10
U2
I Braddack-P
2.20
2.20
Small Gram, Sila&&Hay
9.2 Tarns
9/1-3131
102
0
20
Broad.
82
0.00
19
0.00
41.95
411
10
02
Br &k"--P
2.20
2.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9113
113
0
0
Broad
113
0.00
26
0.00
57.81
534
1
U2
COCA
40.00
3810
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 Me.
4/1-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33
0.00
1,299.33
5942
1
U2
Cecil
36.00
35.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
0.00
1,162.31
587
1
U2
Cecil
2.60
2.00
Small Grain, Silago'Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
20
Broad
84
0.00
20
0.00
39.07
587
1
U2
Cecil
2.60
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/19/15
140
0
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
0.00
65.12
587
2
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, SilagcfHay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
20
Broad
1
0.00
201
0.001
195.35
587
2
U2
Cecil
10.00
10A0
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
4
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
0.00
325.58
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUT Pale 2

0 0 0
WaatP T Ttili-Yatinn TAIP
vpu r 1
Tray I
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
{
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nkrogm
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Camm
Fat,
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(aae)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
ibs/A
1000
M1/A
tons
1000 MIS
tons
587
3
U2
Ce6l
22.10
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
20
Broad
84
0.00
20
0.00
97.67
587
3
U2
Cell
22.10
5.00
Soybeans, Manures Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.00
162.79
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Small Gram, SilarJHay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
20
Broad
84
0.00
20
0.00
38.60
587
4
U2
Cecil
20.20
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double- Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
broad.
140
0.00
- 33
0.00
97.67
587
4-1
Ul
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
0
brig.
104
19.99
0
99.97
0.00
587
4-1
UI
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Imp,
140
26.91
0
134.57
0.00
587
4-2
Ul
Cecil
7.90
7.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
brig.
104
19.99
0
157.94
0.00
587
4-2
Ul
lCouil
7.90
7.901
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Irriv,
140
26.91
0
212,62
0.00
587
4-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silag&Hey
9.4 Tms
9/1-3131
104
0
0
brie,
104
19.99
0
103.96
0.00
587
4-3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Irrip,
140
26.91
0
139.95
0.00
587
4-4
Ul
C&al
7.20
7.20
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Irrip,
104
19.99
0
143.95
0.00
587
44
Ui
Cecil
7.20
7.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
brig.
140
26.91
0
193.78
0.00
587
4-5
Ul
Cecil
6.70
6.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Irrip,.
104
19.99
0
133.95
0.00
587
4-5
UI
Cecil
6.70
6.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
brig.
140
26.91
0
190.32
0.00
587
4-6
Ul
Cecil
6.10
6,10
Small Grain, SilsoWHay
9.4 Tans
911-3/31
104
0
0
Irrig.
104
19.99
Q
121.96
0.00
587
4.6
U1
Cecil
6.10
6-10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
brig.
140
26.91
0
164.17
0- 0
587
7
U2
Caul
16.80
8.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
911-3131
98
0
20
Broad
78
0.00
18
0.00
156.00
587
7
U2
Cecil
16.80
8.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
411-9115
132
0
0
Broad
132
0.00
31
0.00
264.00
587
7-1
U1
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Snail Grain, SilageJHay
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Imp-
98
18.84
0
154.49
0.00
587
7-1
Ul
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/ 1-9115
132
0
0
Irrig,
132
25.38
0
208.08
0.00
587
8
U2
Cell
38.00
15.80
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
8-8 Tans
9/1-3131
98
0
20
Broad
78
0.00
18
0.00
286.60
587
8
U2
Cecil
1 38.00
15.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9115
132
0
0
Broad
132
0.00
31
0.00
485.02
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 YAU Pale 3

a a a
Waste Iltili" inn Tattle
Year 1
Tra,A I
Field
Source
I.D.
Soli Series
i
Total
Acre
Use.
Aare
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rect'd
Cunun.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Rea
(INIA)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000018
tans
587
8-1
UI
Cavil
6.20
6.20
Small Grain, Silage/11ay
9.4'1'ons
9/I-3131
104
0
0
Irrig.
104
19.99
0
123.96
0.00
587
8.1
111
emit
6.20
6.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
Irrig.
140
26.91
0
166.96
0.00
587
9-2
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Sitage/1-lay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Imp,.
104
19.99
0
135.95
0.00
587
8-2
Ul
Cecil
6.90
6.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
I rip.
140
26.91
0
183.01
0.00
587
9-3
U I
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, SitagrlHay
9.4 Tones
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Imp,
104
19.99
0
103.96
0.00
587
8-3
UI
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
Irrig.
140
26.91
0
139.95
0.00
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Small Grain, Silag&Hay
9.8 Tans
9/1-3/31
98
0
20
Broad.
78
0.00
18
0.00
146.93
587
9
U2
Cecil
19.00
8.10
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
132
0
0
Broad,
132
0.00
31
0.00
248.65
587
9-1
UI
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain,Silagelllay
8.STom
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
brig.
98
19.84
0
152.60
0.00
587
9-1
Ul
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
132
0
0
Irrig.
132
25.38
0
205.54
0.00
587
9-2
UI
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
I0.1 Tons
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Imp,
112
21.53
0
157.19
0.00
587
9-2
U 1
Cavil
7.30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
411-9115
152
0
0
Irrig.
152
29.22
0
213.31
0-00
587
9-3
Ul
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Sitag&Hay
8.8 Tans
9/1-3131
98
0
0
Irrip,
98
18.84
0
128.11
0.00
587
9-3
UI
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9115
132
0
0
Irrig.
132
25.38
0
172.55
0.00
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tons
911-3/31
94
0
20
Broad
74
0.00
17
0.00
103.25
587
9A
U2
Cecil
13.00
6.00
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
32 bu.
411-9/15
124
0
0
Broad
124
0.00
29
0.00
173.02
587
10
U2
Congaree
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
911-3131
ill
0
20
Broad.
91
0.00
21
0.00
42.32
587
10
L12
Congaree
2.00
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9115
179
0
0
Broad.
179
0.00
42
0.00
83.25
587
11
U2
Cecil
75.00
10.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
411-9115
132
0
0
Broad.
132
0.00
31
0.00
322.32
587
It- I
U1
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
Irrig,
140
26.91
0
80.74
0.00
587
11- 2
UI
Cecil
2.60
2.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
Irrig
1 140
26.91
0
69.98
0.00
587
11- 3
U 1
Ceti]
6.20
6.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
Irrig,
140
26.91
p
166.86
0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 VWT Pape 4

0 0 0
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Traci
Field I
Source
J.D.
Soil Series
a
Taal
Acre
Use
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm
Fat
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibe/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutriart
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Uquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
BaVA
tons
10009319
tons
587
l l- 4
U I
Cac-il
7,30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/ 1-9/15
140
0
0
brig.
140
26.91
0
196.47
0.00
587
11- 5
UI
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Soybeans, b4mmred, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
lrrig
140
26.91
0
174.94
0.00
587
1 I-6
111
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
41l-9115
140
0
0
Irrip,
140
26,91
0
196.47
0.00
587
11-7
U1
Coil
7.30
730
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu,
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
Irrig
140
26.91
0
196.47
0.00
587
11- 8
111
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double CnV
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
140
U
p
Wig,
140
26.91
0
218.00
0.00
587
11- 9
111
Cavil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4119/15
140
0
0
IrriF,
140
26.91
0
218.00
0.00
587
11-10
UI
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
brig,
140
26.91
0
218.00
0.00
587
11G
112
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, SilagdHay
8.8 Tons
911-3131
98
0
20
Broad.
78
0.00
18
0.00
90.70
587
I1G
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Soybeans, Manurod, Double Crop
34 bu.
411-9/15
132
0
0
Broad.
132
0.00
31
0.00
153.49
587
12
112
Cecil
2.90
2.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
20
Broad
89
0.00
21
0.00
60.02
587
12
U2
Cecil
2.90
2.90
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/l-9/15
144
0
0
Broad
144
0,00
33
0.00
97.11
587
13
112
Coil
2.00
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 hu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad
144
0.00
33
0.00
66.98
587
14
U2
Cecil
24,50
2.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
0.00
74.88
587
14-1
U 1
Coil
9.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Irrip,
140
26.91
0
218.00
0.00
587
14-2
U 1
Cecil
7.30
7.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 hu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Irrip-
1 140
26.91
0
196.47
0.00
587
14-3
U I
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 hu.
411 9/15
140
0
0
Irrig,
140
26.91
0
183.01
0.00
587
14G
L12
Madison
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, SilaggrHay
6.9 Tons
911-3/31
77
0
20
Broad.
57
0.00
13
0.00
53.02
587
140
I12
I Madimm
4.00
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
26 hu.
411-9115
101
0
0
Broad
101
0.00
23
0.00
93.95
587
15
U2
Chewacla-P
8.00
8.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
I77
0
0
Broad
177
0.00
41
0 DO
329.30
587
16
U2
Chewacla-P
5.70
5.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
0
0
Broad
177
0.00
41
629
1
U2
Cecil
20.20
19.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Broad
140
0.00
33
A
--630
1
U2
Cecil
18.40
19.40
Small Grain, SiiaswI-lay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
98
0
20
Broad
78
0.04
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUT Page 5

0 i 0
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Said
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fat,
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
Obs/A)
Applie.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid I
Manure
Applied
(erne)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs1A
Ron
gal/A
tans
1000 gals
tons
-630
1
U2
Coed
19.40
18,40
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9115
132
0
0
Broad,
132
0.00
31
0.00
564.83
--630
2
U2
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 ,fons
9/1-3/31
109
0
20
Broad
89
0.00
21
0,00
107.63
-630
2
U2
Cecil
5-20
5.20
Soybemta, Manured, Double Crop
376u.
4/1-9115
j 144
0
0
Broad
144
0.00
33
0.00
174.14
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,366.09
liquid Manure
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
Balance, 1000 gallons
'Foul Applied, tons
16,190.20
Manure Solids
'Total Produced, tors
..
Balance, tans
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol - means leased, otherwise. owned. 2. Symbol a means user entered data.
---- .. .. - ----------------- ---- ----------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 WUT Page 6

X
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U 1
TC Williams Dairy Slurry waste generated 2,797,000 gals/year by a 315
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
16005
Incorporated
21824
Injected
24734
Irrigated
14550
Actual PAN Applied
CPounds)
Actual Volume -Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
39,555.11
7,604,055
-4,807,055
U2
TC Williams Dairy Solids waste generated 450.36 tons/year by a 120
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1937
Incorporated
2567
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Quantity Applied
(Tons)
Surplus/Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
119,498.30
27,789.91
-27,339-55
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG43942
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
Note: In source ID. S means standard source. U means user defined source.
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

Ci
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
lndex(Lt1'
Soil Series
Cron SecLuence
RYE
1197
1
38.50
38.50
15.0
Madison
Small Grain, SilageR-lay
7.7 Tans
Com. Silage
17.0 Tons
139A
2
17.001
17.00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
Com. Silage
18.4 Tons
1397
2G
1.50
1.50
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
1415
1
20.50
19.80
15.0
Cecil
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
1415
2
7.60
7.30
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tans
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
1416
11
1.60
1.601
9,0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
Com, Silage
29.0 Tans
1416
2
5.40
5.40
22.0
Buncombe
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
5.0 Tons
Cam, Silage
10.0 Tans
1417
1
4.50
4.50
15.0
Congaree
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
MO Tons
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
141
2
2.70
2.70
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tons
Com, Silage
17.7 Tons
1417
3
7.20
7.20
15.0
Congaree
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
Com. Silage
28.0 Tans
1417
4
1.60
1.60
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
'9.0 Tons
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
411
1
22.70
22.70
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
411
2
9.10
9.10
15.0
Braddock-P
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.6 Tons
Com, Silage
14.4 Tons
411
2A
16.30
16.30
15.0
Riverview-P
Fescue Hay
4.5 Tons
411
3
7.00
7.00
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
411
4
7.20
6.90
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.0 Tons
Com. Silage
22.0 Tons
411
5
9.00
9.00
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Com. Silage
22.0 Tons
411
6
16.50
16.50
11.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silag&Hay
09.0 Tons
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
411
7
3.30
3.00
15.0
Braddock-P
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
41 l
8
1.30
1.30
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.0 Tans
-------------------------------------------------------------•------ --- ---------------------- ----------------------------------
Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 PCS Page 1 of 4
UTE: Svmbol * means user entered data.

l
1st Ukvu %�l V a JUsx lll4i
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
L-chung
Index (Ll)
Soil Series
Cro Sequence
RYE
Corn. Silage
22.0 Tana
411
9
8.60
8.60
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Crain, Silage/Hav
9.0 Tons
Com, Silage
22.0 Tuns
411
9A
2.00
2.00
15.0
Braddock-P
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tans
411
10
2.20
IN
15.0
Braddock-P
Fescue Hav
4.6 Tans
534
1
40.00
38.80
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain. Silag&Hay
9.6 Tuns
Com. Silage
20.0 Tons
5842
1.
36.00
35.70
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com. Silage
19.5 Tons
587
1
2.60
2.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
587
2
10.00
10.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
587
3
22.10
5.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
587
4
20.20
3.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tans
587
4-1
5.00
5.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
58
4-2
7.90
7.90
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
58
4-3
5.20
5.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
587
7.20
7.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
5$
4-51
6.70
6.70
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
58
4.6
6.10
6.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
587
7
16.80
8.60
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tans
58
7-1
9.20
9.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tans
587
81
38.00
15.80
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tau
58
8-1
6.20
6.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
58
8-2
6.90
6.80
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
58
8-3
5.20
5.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
587
9
19.00
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
58
9-1
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tans
58
9-2
7.30
7.30
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
58
9-3
6.80
6.80
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
587
9A4
13.00
6.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
387
10
2.00
2.001
15.0
Congaree
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
587
11
75.00
10.50
MO
Cecil
Small Gram. Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
Com. Silage
18.4 Tons
587
11- 1
3.00
3.00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com. Silage
19.5 Tots
587
11-2
2.60
2.60
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com. Silage
19.5 Tons
SR7
11-3
6.20
6.20
15.0
C'xit
Small Grain. Silag&HaY
9.4 Tuns
.... ..---------------------------- -----------••---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4CDatabase Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 PCS Page 2 of 4
'�j062
CE: SN-mbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crans Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
L'`sciling
Ins (LI)
Soil Series
Cron Seauence
RYE
Corn, Silagu
19.5 Tons
587
11-4
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Gram, SilagwHay
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.3 Tars
587
11- 5
C50
6.50
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
11-6
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cxil
Small Grain. SilagerHay
9.4 Tons
Cam, Silage
19.5 Tots
587
11-7
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain,SilagzHay
9.4Tms
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
11- 8
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
11-9
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
11-10
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tmj
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
110
5.00
5.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
587
12
2.90
2.90
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tom
587
13
2.00
2.00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
58
14
24.50
2.30
15.0
Cavil
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
14-1
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
14-2
7.30
7.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Gram, SilagelHay
9.4 Tans
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
587
14-3
6.80
6.80
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silagc/Hay
9.4 Tans
Com, Silage
19.5 Tons
597
14G
4.00
4.00
15.0
Mw ism
Fescue Hay
3.1 Tans
587
15
8.00
8.00
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Gram, Silag*Hay
'9.0 Tars
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tans
587
16
5.70
5.70
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage(Hay
*9.0 Tons
Cam, Silage
28.0 Tons
629
1
20.20
19.50
15.0
cadl
Small Grain. SilagdHay
9.4 Tons
y
Com. Silage
19.5 Tons
630
1
18.40
18.40
15.0
Cectil
FesLve Hay1
4.0 Tuns
630
Z
5.20
5.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
PLAN TOTALS.- 777.30 603.60
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• ---------------------
'062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 PCS Page 3 of 4i�TE: Svmbol * means user entered data.

r
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low polential to contribute to
None
2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
= 2 &
oderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< =10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
lroot zone.
High potential to contribute to
utrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
Soluble nutrient leaching below the
i prove the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
of zone.
houuld be considered Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients,
Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such
as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
062 Database Version 2.Q Date Printed: 01-31-2003 PCS Page 4 of 4
: Svmbol * means user entered data.

• The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Source Name TC Williams SlurryDesignStorage
Capacity a s
Start Date 9/15
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
121
1
3
180
1
4
150
1
5
119
1
6
89
1
7
58
I
8
27
1
9
-3
1
10
180
1
11
150
1
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
•-----------•-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-31-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. it also lists the ma,amum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
&oil series
.application hate
(inchesihour)
Application Amount
(inches)
587
4-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-4
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-5
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
4-6
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
7-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
9-1
Cecil
0.40
L.0
587
8-2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
9-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
9-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
9-2
Cecil
0.44
1.0
587
9-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
it- I
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11-2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 4
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 5
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11-6
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 7
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11- 8
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
1 L- 9
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
11-10
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
14-1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
14-2
Cecil
0.40
1.0
587
14-3
Cecil
0.40
1.0
NOTE: symbol • means Leer entered data.
•---------------- ----- -- -- - ------------- --- -- ---- -----
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/3l/03 1AF Page 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Manap-ement
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
0 there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------I--------------------------------------------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be auolied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
® --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
o _______ __________________ ___________________ __---------- _______
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 Specification Page 3

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------
335062 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/31/03 Specification Page 4

T. C. Williams Farm
Soil Survey Legend
Symbol Name, Texture, Slope and Erosion
Alexander County
AcE Ashe-Cleveland complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, stony
BsC2 Braddock and Hayesville clay loams, b to 15 percent slopes, eroded
BsD2 Braddock and Hayesville clay foams, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded
ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
CsD Cowee-Saluda complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes, stony
CsE Cowee-Saluda complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, stony
EcD Evard - Cowee complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes, stony
EcE Evard - Cowee complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, stony
RxA Riverview fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
WeA Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
0
4
\•

r �k � �� 1, u1' �y,i! _ bit` S".. I T 4 „7 l� •71
r
,� jr�� �u~��� � T�%G� I� ✓�� .lam 4ia: �7�*f 1; j �� - '
h• Wit! 5�.�x'r�{f ��� r '�� ! � r� ^'k� � WC', P
"' ftwk
.der', t as '`rMb'-�•� »i e
i+ 1 t� ��� �tieu, '`�_ � '.. i•'4 ��a, a! ��, r� Jl R�� }.�o.+�' �. r ,
�v{T � , � � ,��a"'•%I'S-� �� ��,� fry � _ vT
p:
i
^! WY[f
�.. �� 'M•'''' ✓� ". w '�fy :�.".. i� � �'n r � �hYMfq } 'YfP�a�c..
!y a. off' I
ra , rr p
a,�y�!` �, �'�F4} 'r }�': .,r ��p. �;�{�� � f• �'aM� 1 aY ."yy, � '.1 +.. °fy.. '1�`" �v�p� yi-L.r A .:

T. C. Williams Farm
Soil Survey Legend
Symbol Name, Texture, Slope and Erosion
County
AsB2
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Bn
Buncombe loamy sand
CcC3
Cecil clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded
CcE3
Cecil clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded
CfB
Cecil fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
CfB2
Cecil fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded_
CfC
Cecil fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
CfC2
Cecil fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
CfD2
Cecil fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
CgC2
Cecil gravelly fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
CgD
Cecil gravelly fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
CgE
Cecil gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
CmC2
Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
CmD
Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
CmD2
CsE
Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
Cecil soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes
CsE2
Cecil soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded
CsF
Cecil soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes
CtD2
Cecil stony fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
CuE
Cecil stony fine sandy loam, shallow, 15 to 25 percent slopes
CuF
Cecil stony fine sandy loam, shallow, 25 to 55 percent slopes
Cw
Chewacla soils
CxB
Colfax sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Cy
Congaree soils
Lo
Local alluvial land
MdB2
Madison gravelly fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
MdC2
Madison gravelly fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
MdF
Madison gravelly fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
Mm
Mixed alluvial land
St "
Star loam
We
Wehadkee silt loam
WkC
Wilkes soils, 6 to 10 percent slopes
WkE
Wilkes soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes
WkF
Wilkes soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes

`ry 3 1� i t+.l � ` i')� �' say 'a r� -1:� �'� "=J , 4 " •�.: v 1 �Yy � N'+. 'i'J G. '�
:� tIh O ,`'�� ° �' m' �r t m r. f 4J.CV +� ,\,`♦ C`;Uf o � 5 . , Y s �t.� � + i fi
�A.
rn
r
+ N . I•
-F4 f.R+cr�'' • { f I 1' � 4 �) 'k"`* J � �xc� ��, � ' t, ~ ° : - I�,�.,.n>t
r
jd` i J-
' a, T► `v ) - _?nL_� k a ('` f ;'t: ' f r' 'yl�s�4r' �+ s'. 1
i t lr},�'�a' �+* �k�, -. +.', i� L �3 ���--�UJk �;.F f c � �w'q•' �' °' °�� � fi �r' ,� � 'Hv'�
rS „ qq
IL
�� �.' J� MI �" )j ni.' - 11. I `'� 'p•. Fr -Gi.. _ w.r .l _ t�:y
1 .3 ` � '�:->• i �f �,' w ri y kt `�' ,4tikkl ,t. ;�; - G1� ,� '
r .i 'X� 4 � +� i - � •� 5 .ra' e - cr "Ili
" ' �' �,'t r • t � ' . _ t\ r.+ �!f to I ."�. - :* -
I:
P� • � F w! �6' y1 �trl 4 � �\�
c �� _i � '� j , r• . s:i f rt`4' „yi , � � ! Er rM ri1An Yry�,,`+iQ ,, at. � 1� "�'
f•S" a• . E ,�y)f„ ,` Y {�` , ak•: '- �. � I -+ ..r. � � � t r n ��� 11 q,
,. _ _t A �. , ��, wK' � � 1r ,Cr Jt `;tiA:;.,�„ r !, �'' •� ' ,,,� ,� , 1 Y},f � '? s
J) �R r �+k�..'"_ � !y , 1GArG t `°�,��"�� - y �iC�•a s: 4
tr 'i1, F � i d .. t P.• t � -4�� i�,r=� y� �!'at-` r .,� . r� µ +�I11 '' � ci + J `Y�
r ^�+.'��.�' 4. s' a': I^ S - v 'i _i4"rr k .�,��.;d•,i
Mr4
•ry I U
ill t �.�) f . e �t4 •r .Y�z r r � �� � v c t "r. N +< I fi�.lk t, # t+. 1 '`;�a. r x ~ m i+: �,t YSP: �, r�M t „
�'
ti`? r� Yf': th`.3 d .. wy%.M : X G''! a: ,1.,.. ``w {.. ��, y�� 1• '4NT y.. x `
- { q L',,.1 .. % ¢ .�.f• C7 • M �- �. Jh ,• S'}; '7 ; ip3 �� A k i�`. `s r "� �y..•,,,- � ,L,
LE.I %"^ ,MCI 4�rY. S4- q? d+ ,y �"� #� rat •� "s �,. � �
I E.I � ` :k?-•F� 4 '+�LM3+4 1T°F �'.� ix��'+C � � � ;'�"�,3� * 3 � r f r , �_• � �."'.� .. 1.:'A � +7J � -,. r'` j . W
I' I �� 1,t ,�11l�I �,'�•t�;. fi 9'�� a ? �_:a •w: `��' � : t3 -, r ca Yr '.-�
rF I :'1L'µ 3 Z°y a -'�',+� s'. '�` rr1^,. ''z.��v:',a� .�� '+". r'' ly RwN r"+.•• r `rJ
� r ,..� 'hl �. ?h��� ' e l N �a. d. `� r'Lt'�'k- .%�, s ..= :•�'v r' � `" ��: '}nr `�y, 4N .•r`a ..� �.
F ... '+ r r ,�,4 I. r a. .� i�. �.r +(irr'�`��3 .jaw�r�• " �-c' L �s:
tt. .�yr 'T�� �letl 1, � , , ^�.,��-r •�._.%^ F I}1•\�e- y .�,,/t�"D`. ..
I '{'�{,' M. ,,� �'g; r�1 y �I*7 f . `,l, '•'�•\ \ I �J y l•fsr ,GGU U :! •<:�- [f1
Er"T F 1 t 1f ti ''}k I+ Oyl
:' '•',' �` � ,icetoLL
fl
k1
3 `
-
i :] �'. r . i h 3•.' Y - iF r .` � - mil! G �' �., rl iJ^ 1 r� ! �' _ 1 '�' � 5 C
Irl tea` • i Fe� ' � �- p t j� .i '[ N•
za r + �srr y §��-='�1 z,1 x. 1� 1 I .�, „�, ��,? �• � �t�;+< � WZ
•��� :.r"t�,.. •'r r'. �'. .. � � tea; -_ a .w; .-m ,/ ca
f
• � r
.,e' .. I ' r 1 •,
} ^ „
i" a ,j �kt��.,�. 4 9 Viz. 4N t �! - ql y� —�+,. ,r+ � ,1� �� % 'V � � •.%�. �+I � N",_ +ir•j
"?J7A. ..li � ` r + t - f { ,�' 414 ' a' 'a '� .i ..-'' t CMti d . t •. �i ; r' c� 4AW w
P .F , �' '4�'r�l t � j , r "�� •, t lr � ,yi "i . �� _r 7 Qw� li '�
k • w s, rr I
fir' � ., ' .�Ct i+ )yY 11• .�. r. � µ �'` N , � �'� - .. LLB
- rfi ' � r�'^ � - ;1� �+���'t tli � ' "ti w, •.3', 'ti °,� "`r r+�''� ; ,�' ��+?. � kt,u•.' -�:
rim
{ ,�,. ^' '.* ; ,r , - r r r.!r +, ,V W : - ii f` r • . W �'r
w F ,a
14
a•r,l.. a u. • w

In
[1.:
Ld
1—
Ld
Lli
_L
C/3
c�
y
m
J
R�
_C
CL'
Q
f
r._
�a

,`'erns sheet 13)

G .
� c
1
I
v ) }}
1 � I Ai
,f'1y}III',���It�l t�,rv!11 ��--, 1✓/i��t�l,' Il��
iirl� I,.15�i ��llt(,/I,(✓ �F� ' -,ter � �'•..', 7
=✓/r�l � t
�,�'
Ix
kl
c r
r,
I
I'
\ i 1 ! Y �
fJ i
I q V
,', '0� 14 '���\ 1���I � �+ � •eft.
rNN41,
II / r,1F i•
!
� F
J�k
� o
pp
- � nll *-' �— / t_-.� �' � `r ��!� s•//�'. �, �rr ° f: I r� //iir ry� � ,
ii
�
F—
��: tj
1.
YN
,j}j I f `4 I}JJ ,s r � ,}, ,� f,��) r ( y/ .. -�✓ }`-- J 4, I
✓,,. `� � I _��%' � j/�I I �� / � _ /. -i y1 4 �Ct_- '_ } Sri ' t
}'! ;✓/,,J//': lf�f �� � I i 1�� � �` ,?) ��I�i11 i,1 I ,li,Ilr/r iv u l ��II�,
,�� � � � if ��� •f � o' I J / 'r' ° �,! I � �:, r' �1,1' rr r
'r'• j �y��� �.� �'/`� �� � 7 , 1117,� � `� ' (`f� .// �� •���r\�`` ��lr, 41' , fli,llill'.
`�E1 � VV11 ����,-�� ��\� , � ~ �ljf � 8� ��.' „• � f �, ,t /44 r f Ilf�r � r i��{-. IJ„`I f., J
u�i �'`'\, �',' �\',. 1. - � °+, �_'�-- �'I. I{4 f�n Y.. ril tt++A 'l, •!!. � —
``I1,
,�''`� I!I r / '✓:_ 1. O ` 1 ti a ��i ,� ; �J �t" l i�. � � i_ _ r�,� � �.� •,� �'r1 � � 1 ��'� { . Ir ti�l � U ,. °.� - I , I
I �< `� 1\��\ � j I �\y, 5, ' i� �,, l.: ��� ( �.:... � � I {"I f � • Jr r .�lJ }�� 4"{ r ,� !
'+`� �° �� � � t S�i'`, � nl�lj� t f , f r i%'✓ d� 1 I l f _��{ {��� t�( ty� i rl r, 7°I ' -
7)-
rJ �% Jil� , t � �j%/���)I. 1' 'G/ ! ll��� 71{ �•,�'�i�J t_. � / '7��Ij[gr ��—. ... JI i 11
Y,�111, �r� ',�� .�I ;�I ✓�� 1 �� 1 f l +' {{° r�1'
°1 r
�
✓ 1 h 1
' .� �•. ✓ � ;--� ,---: ((l �''� � � �i rr � I r l�� y fir,° �, � ! ��l _.
��. �a4. _- �_�� \ // � •-. •� �° � i�� � i J . �' �r �,.1 •.1 Yf ���`\ II "' ij!! r'1 .. �/ I '�`\d b'
(, hF
rr
LL,
to
4.,`Lr � ) / ����. - 11�: � �,, `�\fF'� ���,� ,.� r---� � '���I� ' %, • [i$I � �v ,/r' ; J , Ilr I � ii rn
10,
r ✓ \vim. � �� ,� I -'1 'i �� } �, � ,1.
,/ \ �; � 1 .,:_ � . � � � � ;:'•�,, Ili I' [ 1, ' --�: --" .� 2 _
,A �St � ��a - � ''��� )',,r',�'�" � �JJ��Jf_l ���.�,i � .�i'.1 if/� �0,✓�'4 °� /, �(�xf'`,� ! ,1 "._
a � � � � � ���p ~ _ , �}}� err' ;: � ,� � ( � •- v ` � �;, li
J 1 � it /' � \\`i �r•� �I�I t )J�) l I' � �. � —,.�-�� 1 � f f ..� I � Pi (, {� f ' �
��- . f`� -. � l �� Jai ��� v. �+ �"_y��f°� Y } •� , 1 'f";` l ., � � � �{j � •• , `�

3990
I 3989
0
J t .a ! f! `� !1 v' ', ' �" �� L' rl � J r � / /. j ..`_� -• -� �`�� %' JI j,� i Map
1 p
C —� -'� T. C. Williams Farm Inc.
: 65J % Facility No. 49-I 7107
Y
Q �/ c� C i`. �s •�,` /��IL.- �.! /{/r r ,-
-« •-_.� L N '�-?r1„7 I � ,---.�'J. � Crf888' Xn611'�_- _ � �. J
3
-
` `-' � �. ,r r•,�` r 4 -'� -. `l,-y J I ,,/d
1 ,
m�
I n• � I
Fl- hip Ch ^h tr _ _ , -_ \ °•- o �- - '�
87 -fx+J -v' MN C
I
39 raas
!
15f}l�+
� / %
r Iy
' \ C15 \ _v - _ ✓ ter! _ _ � . - - - f '^- � .186E 1�� � i rpp 11 \ r
1 �
v-
•f ' � � � � _� - . ��� -~� �—� W � ` � - � � 1, 1. �:_ . � ` , `� ,, r •rr - �_ �j \ �-. }
_ c 77
�y lr
If
few Ho
�/'�/ } �� .�✓� `-� �- 6 ✓raj �! 'Z� �. - � � ��
pn
- -,�' - r�'*'ti..--. \ S`_
ET tJr`. r� -- hr�- �-- � �1 � y � �_-�J � `�,_,�� /'- _-�✓ �f�r -r �L
!/ ' 100 I
� �f`��(I//.r '�• 4 i�_ i / �r'� - Y� �1 k �-~- ` Y�t . *� ��� :'� I : � `�� � ' I
$591
4/ �� - � � ` � . � �� -� -� � � f' - I , r•, . I �L.I r' z ,�' ...ram f
Cem` �i'\l(
if
r•.`�'
top
i��`•� .� r. 1 �/ t 1 �� (U •fr- 1 �! �J i! c /a fZ 11
�� #I -, � � \� ��� � _ M1�` • 131-' 1 � � � 6� �. r`1 tom'
tv
o r �----_-' f i�'*�� � '��^1 ` � 1 ��--,-r rarer � - (� �� f,�� �.. l � l _ .� ,f / �/y'• l : i � -� - I�f�'"- J-/:' .
84
.'sue rrl�^�
1410000 FEET 5011°00' s021146
11a
ViLLE 4 rr ����tiJJJ 1—
ESE
17 AMP.[CENTRAL! 506 507' 5 r %I 5
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey 4855 rM AdW O} i�i1.5. GOVEFNMEN'
Control by S1SC;S and 1rSC&GS - _ 1 , SCALE 1:24000 Sr

{" •�hll C � �� �/ _ - ' � i� 1 L -� I � f - ! I � Il'-F1 �17i ,4 , +�r�
�� I f=� i t� II ` �l ` -i e� �hlh �'/ftl/�=.5 ,��i�'•f��%t.
it 1• { " _ / ) 1 - 1 --�� --.� ` hl { rag' I. - - +r �} l�'
�r
. f') - � C I�/rjj�+I��I^4.`i`i ��� :`! ~�4 '•�(�`-_ r.�li ° l5 �' � 41. !�. � � .-
rj^^ ` f o le \ ��t� � r I�^�4 �� l/`j `iY�-=1��,`� l' ` o'� ( � ` .` •, : ^ '' (� `r
R ll� C
ous
ol
/ a
r
1
6

i 7 C. Williams Dairy
t �'a-� 4- Irrigation Map
4-2 h
T. C. Williams Farm Inc.
I �- ✓ I Facility No. 49-17 Union Gmre. N
Loop
/ 1 1 , Wield 3
I ! I I
Pipe key
I ! ! + r
7-1 Q r PR�26B 91PPK NO Py.
Field 4
I I I !
I it
I I Field 7
\ q
1 q
8-3 I
! ti Field 8
4-1
4-3
8-2 \.
8
I ! I '{ r11-1 ''• Sprinkler Valve key
I I r yr' 11-3 11-1 -~ - Trw. r- Lomtjm eq V Ri..r.,. Paw
/ i - rFtid�s+F T�s-flet�en Yalw 6' I Field 9 11-4 11- Z I Q- -- — — — — — — — — , q-t a-.., Vei a 2-
I ,
1l-� � \ \ ` I Field 1� Field 15 =
I ield9A \ ♦ \ I 0----=i------
1 #-2
1-8 \ \ \
QL
9-2 \ \ Field 11 © I
`� ` ♦ TrP-b7 B.t'J75 PIE IC PE LZMM AT
sq
* EVERT OR14E IN PIPE DIJEGTDI
8EM
* \ \ \ PFE 1ltTR-L=q WnW IS M If 3V'-Cr
' \ PPE IS S M PM
Z& PRESRAE PC.
TRI-fc-IM: HIVE S R F SS-
\ \ \ 11-5 xm W-V FPCi wnu,RF 1"C
ItGra—Mae Distributing Co.
�\
\ 2310 NC Fury. B01 N
uoclsville, TIC
Phone [phone]=
11-9� Fax 910-NO-3W
Designed by: ]amoa Graham
Dam ID-,s-98
Scale I" - 600' 1 Design Nek 228

i
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrig1tion Gun Settings
i
EXHMBlT U-2
Make, Model and Type of Equipmen(: ,`
,l.oN Sloo 1rt�AKA N sc— Ro-u4P- ems.. 11(Pa 3� -To No JV ! .. I. '
Field Not
and
It ant Not
Travel
Speed
Ok/win)
Application
Rate
ti w)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width fl Lan fl
Wetted
Diameter
feet
EQUIPMENT SITTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
inches Gun(psi) Rol i Pattem3
fle Wu 1.
4R�
.LS
Z 4'
9 `
'
1.2
$o
I :xc>
30
! 2-
4-1.
s 2s
3
!. 2 (p
fa
I Lo
300
R3
-
Szs-
Awo'
9so'
3 '
l.-;Llo
10
1 2.0
300
C,-)
4 -
s is
A90
1308
3bo'
. Z
).0
300
•2-
if- S
S,�sV
'a 9 v'
/alb'
3 D`
•ito
go
1AD
300
/
2-1
S,
,R
ld 3S
3106,
, 26
go
12-0
300
8-
SdS
'R9
/a8'
A D'
1-z4s
80
0-0
300
�2
1a3l?
1 f, 0 '
/.240
80
1 Z0
300
z-
3
TS8'
3 0'
1 a0
3ob
a
-1
S2S
AY",
3&0'
D
0�0
Soo
p
-Z
,zY
.3 8'
.3ka
Aak
90
1010
30D
32-
2 y'
98`
3(oo'
0
0
3 60
3 o z
-
. aJ
�O�(pip
3 r
. L
/AD
3 D
11- 3
, a
q
au"
110,
36D,
1 - 2-
o
a 0
3o0
A, .z
a.s
Y
d yo'
IJA
3(p o
1. 21*
/a4
Sao
3 2
zs
aG '
/068'
360'
l.a(V
g0
,Tao
30a
b
- (v
5• L.�
, y
R Sb'
13v19'
3 0'
146
80
/a p
300
1 See attached snap.
2Sltow separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
-'Use [lie following abbreviations for various arc patients: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of are.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

7j
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
•
EXl Q 3rr ©-2
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: ---• r 3
LawQ S A�tJO p e t cu,e� x 3 lb s mrJ a. .�
Field Nol
and
Ilydrant Not
Travel
Speed
(fl/min
Application
Rale
inlhr)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width(fl) Length fl
Wetted
Diameter
feet
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(inches) Gun (psi) Rat i) Pattem3
i3==Cwb
/1 -7
S. ly
jj.AS
3 '
r 2
Sa
Z
Sop
. 3 Z
1-8
Ak q'
3d$'
3 '
a
fro
I2-o
lot)
8• aS
S, i
A
13d8
3 D"
1. z
l-D
IZfl
3 oa
g. o-5—
J a
s•aS
'
1 d
3 '
D
Zo
'5,OS -
'
'
isag'
3(c '
8�
ao
Sop
,o S
a VO'
13 W"
.360,
AX0
Soo
3 2
14-3
ISee attached map.
2Show seliarate entries for each hydrant local ion in each field.
3Use [lie following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (ftill circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), Ii (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
NRCS, NC
TUNE, 1996

T- c . w; //)q ru.s
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Speciftcalions
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
3 ts0
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
Mg psr
Design Precipitation Rate (Inlhr)
y
Hose Length (feet)
f j ' 0 r
XXXXXXxx
Type of Sneed Compensation
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine* Electric)
O
Pump Power Requirement (lip)
TABLE 5 - Thnist Block Specirications
uesiner may ronue tnruss otocx ue18115 on se araie sneer.
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION I AREA (sq. ft.)
900 Bend
Dead End
Tee
n__ r—'. 11i — I]!_I_1l wt-- !.__21_ n__.:__ 111
..�- .....ass .......................... . �............ �...w , ........0 .., a ......w....w.. ��...-..+a.
EXMIT1A
t
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

BIG GUN° PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS '--- 24° TRAJECTORY'*
010 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
4
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
°5"
'S5"
.6"
.65"
.7'
.75'
.8"
.85"
.9"
1.0'
P.S.I.
GPM 01A.
GPM DIA.
GPM DtA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
p3 40'
1 ' 280y�
1b
130 265'
150 273'
165 280'
204 300'r
50
50 205'
64 215'
74 225'
87 235'
100 245'
115 256'
70
60 225'
75 238'
86 250"
103 263'
120 275'
136 263'
155 295'
177 302'
197 310'
243 336,
°90
�!w
95
149; 295r
.1.18a '30's`d
', a •,-31A�
2ld..."w','�`325
°j.
68 245'
83 258'
706270'
11 7 263'
735 295'
755 30fi'
175 315'
20t 326`
223 335°
274 362'
d5[
05,
.16�J.: '316;.'165
,325,
212:'339
235:" 345'28
y372'T
n0
76 265'
92 278'
111 290'
129 303'
150 3i5'
171 324'
195 335'
222 344•
247 355'
304 380'
Available only with 1`100 8 SR100.
100 R RING NOZZLES
iI�I�I e] ►!# e] I � 15I9 �:i ► [e7��R �.]
PSI
.71 RING
GPM DIA
77 RING
GPM DIA
.81 RING
GPM DIA
.86 RING
GPM DIA
.89 RING
GPM DIA
.93 RING
GPM DIA
96 RING
I GPM DIA
0.5 ON
GPM DIA
0.6 DN
I GPM DIA
0.7 DN
GPM DIA
0.6 DN
I GPM DIA
40
60
60
80
100
"1f8
66 208
78 212
91 215
103 224
118 235
134 238
�"`�15Q 25r r
164 275
189 305
212 325
rr zzi''.3s6"
AiWJXWfi0='
7Ai--
W00}di,'►8a.=
152 242
1,87sc280�._
183 280
211 315�3.90'X
4MaIS "
236 335
k 2a8'"945
45 154
50 ;10
- -
66 168
,.�.73
- -
91 182
' i00-, 94m
110 20C
lie 196
143 216
81 235
96 240
110 245
125 260
265
i .
162 305
29 D,a, -
141 270
163 300
182 320
1a1 :az3'"
94 255
105 270
1 111 265
124 260
a127275145
M
-- i nu Diameter Or 1nmw m appruximately a-m ,ass cur the LI- Irulaut-Y angle, - IV" for Iu-.
150 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY`*
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
PS.L
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA,
I Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM DIA.
60
Ito 265'
143 285'
102 305'
225 325'
275 345'
330 365,
385 380'
80
128 290,
165 310,
210 335'
260 355'
315 375'
380 395'
445 410'
i15=wwu
135 r3.9.0
bD 4jD=
2121MPIMMIM=
100 1
143 310'
185 330' 1
235 355'
290 375'
355 400'
425 420'
1 500 440'
355.`a�bw37o490
, , , -
20
t57 330'
204 350'
258 375'
320 395'
385 420'
465 440'' 1
545 a60
15n R RING NOZZLES
Ring
Ring
Ring
Rin
Ring
Rin$
Ring
PS.I,
86"
GPM DIA.
.97"
GPM DIA.
I",
GPM DIA.
1,te
GPM DIA,
1.28"
GPM DIA.
1.3A
GPM DIA.
1.41"
GPM DIA.
60
110 280'
143 280,
182 300,
22$ 315,
275 335'
330 350,
385 365,
7MD9S(9
80
128 280,
165 300,
210 320'
260 340'
315 360,
380 380,
445 395'
;MMMONUMSYx
35n^TS zz i
r'4Z�8�
- 416a7MT(
too
143 300'
185 320'
235 340'
290 360,
355 300'
425 400'
500 415'
ECKMONXI=ern
-
3ra air
S2S=i
120
157 315'
204 335'
258 360'
320 380'
385 a00'
465 420'
545 435'
'The diameter of throw is approximately 3%;ass for Ina 21" tra)eclory angle.
200 SERIES BIG GUNS - 270 TRAJECTORY"
9nn T TADPQ RnRF Nn771 FS
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
1.05'
t2"
13°
1.4'
15"
1'6'
1.75"
1.9'
P&L
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA,
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA,
g0
iD
tis' 7
625�;�49
70
270 360,
310 380'
355 395'
415 410'
480 430,
555 450'
630 465'
755 495'
ago 515`
9xn==0=
=246
A3f7 ifs
..:: II&M*•4-Z6.1 6:
TA95.rW�°".4id -
67K.V--4*M
90
310 390'
350 410'
405 425'
.
475 445'
545 465'
625 485'
715 505,
855 535'
1005 555'
11�1 l4-ZW0
0=.4-0-Im:
„ 1548d=
s�f3'9q;�„a�00�...
"��a„i755��::�0 - '.
-M- 900.r:561!. a...Y1Q6d:=575.;:.a
110
340 $10'
390 430"
445 450'
S25 4""
605 495'
n: 8301-Md5 .i�`w
695 515'
725-s-.630° .
790 535'
ra B23=i $0
945 565'
w1. 6$ SAp"T
1110 590r
�u7160-Sal.-
�
T30
370 425'
425 445'
485 465'
565 485'
655 515'
755 540'
060 560'
1025 590'
1210 620'
9nn P PIN(% Nn771_FS
PS..
1 y,' Ring
(1.29" actual]
GPM DIA.
t 3G" Ring
(1.46" actual)
GPM DIA.
1 +,j' Ring
(156" actual)
GPM DIA.
t %" Ring
(1.86" actual)
GPM DIA.
IJA• Ring
(1.74" actual)
GPM DIA.
1 '/," Ring
(1.83" actual)
GPM DIA.
2" Ring
(t.93" actual)
GPM DIA.
161 SE
j 90
7. O5'
636"
90
60
250 340'
330 370'
385 390,
445 4110'
515 425'"
585 440'
696 455'
�06'i�xL�s.
'�60,F"�"ti, a425aen"'"•Y
:� 5�44d.��.,,""
� 630�455.r"`"�;�.:�
"765� � d19�:.;
0
290 370'
380 d00'
445 420'
515 440'
590 455'
675 470'
605 490,
Zfd=ffdM,
I q aMUi
i 2 A3$S,�wt�y
1'SAb ..455 4 a
:I�--,26=.,,,14767-IrM,
100
325 390'
425 425'
500 445'
175 465'
660 480
755 Soo,
900 5204
637-
_
v
120
355 470'
485 445'
545 41
630 485'
725 500'
825 520'
985 545'
h"1367
ns.- 3 .•
��TiF�
"+3�'�SC���A70'?'.
��856'�"r.yr490+vt'--
"�-� 755'•'*'505'��
"..� B80-r'?". 625"►."z
�` .1025� �550r�. _
The diameter or Wow is approximately 2% less IOC rile 14" ira)eelory angle, bwo less for Ine ei- tra)cclery angle.
The BIG GUN°' performance data has been obtained under ideal lest conditions and may be adversely alfectee by wind, poor hydraulic entrance conditions or other !actors
Nalson Irngallon Corporation makes no representallbn regarding droplet condnlon, urndormlly. or application rate.

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Ched list
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
•
Dairy production
A Vegetative or wooded buffers
[( Recommended best management practices
C( Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn
•
Wet manure -covered
91 Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces
surfaces
9( Promote drying with proper ventilation
i( Routine checks and maintcnance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
a
Urine
ir Promote drying with proper ventilation
•
Partial microbial
R( Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
+
Partial microbial
❑ Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or
a
Partial microbial
0 Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
❑ Tank covers
•
Mixing while filling
f" Basin surface mats of solids
a
Agitation when emptying
d Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
Pf Agitate only prior to manure removal
VProven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
.
Partial microbial
❑ Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces
decomposition
❑ Remove solids regularly
•
Mixing while filling
•
Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or
•
Agitation when spreading
❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader
.
Volatile gas emissions
19 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets
EMI Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Dairy Farm waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure,
« Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
E4
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
I(
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
« Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain
« Agitation during wastewater
❑
Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations « Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at « Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces « Volatile gas emission ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity
« Biological mixing ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
« Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping
11 Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler « High pressure agitation if Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles « Wind drift - If Minimum recommended operating procedure
Nr Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
0 Pump from second -stage lagoon
dFlush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals a Carcass decomposition od Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water a Improper drainage If Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities a Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto a Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access - - -
Additional Information: Available From :
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3

Insect Control Cheddist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed
if Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal
Pq Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal
C9 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes
7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
Rf Provide for adequate drainage around manure
[stockpiles
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 2

Insect Control Cheddist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liauid Svstems
Flush gutters . Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids © Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative . Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders • Feed spillage 0 Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
91 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 1

C
101
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of -the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from -any flowing
stream or public body of water.
dRgndering_ata rend er�-plant .licensed-under-G.S. 106-I68.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
1 approved by the DepaAmentof Agriculture
EJ Any method which in the professional opinion of "the State Veterinarian would
make po,ssiale -the .alvage . of 4= . of a .dead. animal's value without -endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

.'.r�'`y._se'� Xa'.r
9-+'
r-a... �-.'Z�
,
'�. q T: • u L` C y,a� i�"" Y -
4 '.�"�`E�
L � �; � � ,.tea G�+.� °ne �+ �,t�".W��: �,�.' M�
� � y
.� � ��✓ ..Ec .rs�,. ,,,{sf _ �. tic a
s 1 x
�t.�:
CATEGORY
EXAMPLES
ACTION
CONTACTS
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff — 704-878-3180
full or partial loss of a Waste
property, contact 911 or Sheriffs Dept,
Storage Pond wall resulting in a
release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-878-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
5353
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor —Church Brothers
Grading
3, Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
Statesville, NC 28625
contain the waste on the farm
704-876-1615
704-876-4744
4. Contact the technical specialist who
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
certified the Waste Storage Pond
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or After Hours Emergency at 919-733-
from base or sidewalls of Waste
3942
Storage Pond; waste discharging
from underground tiles
Tech. Spec. -- 704-873-6761, ext. 3
2, Make all attempts to stop the discharge;.
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
Local Contractor -- Church Brothers
these may result in complete
technical specialist can assess situation
Grading
structural failure
704-876-1615
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat" category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single storm events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes,
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker

r.,t
'. ��:.; :a .� ,.. >w'o > ri• - i . syt o-ar :,�:y E� x. £'.r � rd- +k r 's �. X`. �, . � 4 • , �,. ..�.
1aa'€�... -_5. #. � -,�. �.`Si.0 ��'�` - i .. Sn.4KN51 .;.. 4=, '.�'"5 i. ,q` �+vn �}rt5 • p „t "�g .' i.t �.''J.':��YF-_
_ 0,
"wa
Waste Storage Overflow Runoff From Waste Leakage From Waste Leakage From Base or
{ Application Field Distribution System Sidewall of Storage Pond
* Add soil to berm to increase * Immediately stop waste * Stop recycle (flushing * Dig a small well or ditch to
elevation of dam application system) pump catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
* Pump wastes to fields at an * Create a temporary diversion * Stop irrigation pump back into Waste Storage Pond
acceptable rate or berm to contain the waste
on the field * Close valves to eliminate * If holes are caused by
* Stop all additional flow to the further discharge burrowing animals, trap or
lagoon (waterers) * Incorporate waste to reduce remove animals and fill holes
further runoff * Separate pipes to create an and compact with a clay type
* Call a pumping contractor air gap and stop flow soil
* Make sure no surface water * Other holes may be likewise
is entering lagoon temporarily plugged with clay
soil

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
0200 Certification
Plan
T. C. Williams Farm Inc.
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. AGITATIONS AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE
5. VEGETATED BUFFERS
6. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
All solid waste will be scraped from the concrete areas, free stalls and feeding areas and stored in the
WASTE STORAGE POND (WSP). All contaminated water (wash, parlor and runoff) will be piped into
the waste storage pond. Animal waste and contaminated water contained in WSP will be land applied to
cropland and pasture at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to provide 180
days storage for the solid wastes produced by 200 head milking herd, 35 dry cows and 80 heifers using
concreted area for feeding.
Additional solid waste will be collected from calf barn and various heifer and dry cow housing and
feeding area around the farm. These will be applied to pasture and cropland as well.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste
Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required
under the Non -discharge regulations.

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
:
00 Certification Plan
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff and wastewater
from the milk barn for a one hundred, eighty (180) day period. A permanent marker has been set
indicating the level of storage available prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm
capacity. The WASTE STORAGE POND consists of an earthen dam, curbing and ramps for
discharging contaminated water into the WSP. The top of the marker is 2.1 feet below the top of
the dam at its lowest point.
OPERATION
The level of management for the entire system will determine the service life of the WSP. Over
time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WSP. The accumulated solids should
not reduce the usable capacity to a point, which requires removal of the solids for many years if
adequate waste agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid
accumulation of solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the WSP to the point that some
form of dredging will be required.
MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a
vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing
operations must take place only when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be
mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District office.
2. AGITATIONS AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of a tractor PTO driven
agitator/pump. An irrigation system is used to apply the waste to the fields near the operation.
Hauling may be necessary to convey the waste to the other fields or to edges of irrigated fields.
See WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN for additional details.
E

C
ANIMAL. WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
OPERATION
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full storage level
marker in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP reaches the marker, liquids must be
removed by pumping from the structure, either into the irrigation system or to a spreader tank for
land application. Do not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate
on frozen or saturated soils. Irrigate only until soil is near the saturation point.
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly agitate the waste in the Storage Pond.
If application equipment (irrigation or spreader) is owned consult owner's manuals for
recommended operational procedures.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receives waste application should have soil tested annually. It is advised and
recommended that waste and soil sample results be used in conjunction with each other.
Irrigation equipment will be inspected for nozzle wear, leaks, and damage, repaired as needed
and calibrated annually.
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The heifer and dry cow feeding areas located adjacent to the freestall barn. The
CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM consists of concrete curbing around
these concrete feed areas. The curbs allow the waste to be scraped against or direct the waste
and runoff into the WSP and prevent runoff of contaminated waste.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed.
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two -fold purpose, they filter sediment and contaminates
from the exposed feeding and lounging areas below the dry cow lounge lot and below the stock
trail to the heifer pasture. They also used to filter drainage from the three trench silos. Their
width is based on slope of land and proximity to streams. It ranges form 25 to 100 feet and is
identified on the sketch. These areas can be control grazed or mowed for hay to prevent
unwanted growth. Refer to the plan sketch for the locations of the VEGETATED BUFFERS,
2

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
0
:7
MODIFICATIONS
The outlet channel for drainage from the Trench Silo next to the free stall barn is closed up and
needs clearing. A culvert will be installed across the farm road to the East to allow drainage
more directly to an existing grass area that is suitable for a buffer. A riprap diffuser will be
installed at end of culvert to defuse the energy and spread out the flow.
The drainage outlet slope of the Trench Silo below the Southeast side of the Waste Storage Pond
will smoothed and widened to allow drainage to spread out over a wider area.
A new trench silo has been constructed down hill on the southwest side of Waste Storage Pond.
The drainage from this silo will be directed to an existing grass filter area. Grade a suitable
channel to direct drainage, level out existing fill and establish vegetation as a critical area.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within the buffer. If
damage by silo drainage, redirect flow to a different area and reestablish vegetation. If grazing
does take place caution should be practiced to prevent overgrazing. Grass should be a minimum
of six (6) inches. These buffers should have at least 80% ground cover. Specified width must be
maintained.
5. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed according to NRCS standard 382 (Fencing), where
recommended by the technical specialists. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed at
locations as indicated on plan maps. These areas are identified as the dry cow lounging
lot/pasture and along the stock trail to the heifer pasture. Other pastures will not need to be
excluded.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or rot. If fencing
wire becomes loose, re -tighten to original specifications. If fence posts are rotted or damaged in
any way, replace damaged posts with a post which meets the
original specifications.
3

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
r
GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
Modifications to silo drainage on all three trench silos to direct contaminated water to existing
grass buffers and spread out the flow.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation is not
adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted by its
labeling.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District if repairs or major modifications are
required for any of the components of this Waste Management System.
This plan is for only the number of animals and acres listed in this plan. Please notify the
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST (S) that signed your Waste Utilization Plan and Certification form if
operational changes take place.
V
4

Fj
9
PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: T. C. WILLIAMS
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 200 MILK COWS
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
O APPROVED BY
t_
DATE
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer

`A INDEX
I. Waste Production on Farm _
II.
Waste Management Objective
A.
Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
B.
Clean Water Exclusion
C.
Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for Dry Cows
D.
Day Old to 200 lb, 200 to 400 lb and 400 to 600 lb
Heifers
E.
Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for 600 to
1,2.00 lb Heifers
F.
Silo Runoff and Leachate
G.
Waste Utilization
H.
Operation and Maintenance Plan
III.
Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
A.
Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4. Volume of Waste
5. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on'pond surface
6. Milking Parlor Wash Water
l
7. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
B.
Summary of Design Volumes
C.
Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
D.
Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
IV.
Clean Water Exclusion
A.
Diversions
B.
Guttering
V.
Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
A. Day old to 200 lb Heifer Group
B. 200 to 400 lb Heifer Group
C. 400 to 600 lb Heifer Group
"D. 600 to 1,200 lb Heifer Group
E. Dry Cows
(0

1
• VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping System
b. Nutrient Balance
C. Disposal Calendar
E. Operation and Maintenance Plan
0
i

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Production on Farm
Mr. Williams has approximately 200 Milk Cows confined
to the freestall and feeding areas. Slurry manure is pushed
into a waste storage pond behind the freestall and feedlot
area. Runoff from freestall and feedlot area flows into the
pond.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service assisted in
design and construction of the existing waste storage pond
in 1984 on the Williams Farm.
30 heifers day old to 200 lbs are housed in hutches and
sheds near milking parlor.
30 heifers 200 lbs to 400 lbs are housed in old milk
facilities.
25 heifers 400 to 600 lbs are housed in shed between
milk parlor and old milk facilities.
80 heifers 600 to 1,200 lbs are housed in pasture on
farm. An unroofed feed alley is located near a drainage way
below the freestall barn. Runoff leaves the feed area
untreated.
An average of 35 dry cows are confined to 10 acre
pasture near the milk parlor. An unroofed feed alley is
located near freestall barn. Runoff from feed area
intermingles with lounging area runoff. This water
( channelizes and leaves lounging areas with little treatment.
Runoff from one silo flows through a grass farm road
side ditch and then into a pasture. Runoff from a second
silo flows into a pasture. Flow distance is relatively
short to stream at second,silo.
II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the waste production described above in a manner
that does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The
system planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to
surface and ground water by recycling waste through soil and
plants.
The following design and plans are required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
The storage period will be determined in the existing
waste storage pond. Manure for milk herd and dry cow and
large heifer feed area will be collected in waste storage
pond. Runoff from feed areas and milking parlor wash water
O are also stored in pond. The manure slurry is irrigated on
l cropland and pasture.

0
P
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. Livestock Exclusion, Filter Areas and Feed Area for Dry
Cows
Untreated runoff from lounging area and hay feed areas
for dry cows will be prevented. Filter areas will be
established below lounging areas. These filter areas will
infiltrate part of the first flush and filter sediment and
organic particles. Seven acres of pasture will be available
for an average of 35 dry cows. Cattle will be fenced out of
drainage ways. 100 ft of vegetative filter will be
established below areas that will likely become bare in
winter time.
The silage feed area will be totally controlled. A
concrete alley will be constructed next to freestall
building to fed dry cows. Manure and runoff will be stored
in existing waste storage pond. Hay will be fed in a ring
on a heavy use area located next to feed alley in dry cow
pasture.
A stock trail from feed area to lounging area -pasture
will be needed.
D. Day Old to 200 lbs, 200 to 400 lbs and 400 to 600 lbs
Heifers
These 3 heifer groups will be 100k confined under
existing roof.
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for 600 to 1200 lb
Heifers
Eighty large heifers are pastured on the farm. 90 plus
acres of pasture is available for this animal group. Cattle
will be fed silage at new feed alley to be located at
freestall barn. Manure and runoff from,the concrete feed
alley will be stored in waste storage pond. Hay will be fed
in a ring on the ridge. Water tanks will be needed to water
animals.
V
F. Silo Runoff and Leachate
Silo runoff and leachate will be diverted through
vegetative filters.

G. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
H. Operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for
180 day period
Drainage area surfaced
lot.
Use average
runoff values
in Ag. Waste Management
Field Manual. Concrete
channels
shall carry 25 yr
- 24
hr runoff
to Waste Storage
Pond. The
drainage area was
taken
from old
design. The
drainage was
checked and found
to be
the same
as designed.
Approximately
6,000 sq ft of drainage
area will
be added to
pond for feed
alley for dry cows and
large heifers
is 'added
to lot.
Drainage Area =
28,434
sq ft +
6,000 sq ft
= 34,434 sq ft
(
Surface =
34,434 sq ft
Unsurface =
0 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH RAINFALL
DEPTH
k DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN. 3.70
50
1.85
20 0.74
1.7
FEB. 3.86
56
2.16
25 0.97
1.6
MAR. 4.51
55
2.48
24 1.08
3.1
APR. 3.35
56
1.88
25 0.84
3.8
MAY 3.86
57
2.20
23 0.89
3.9
JUN. 4.19
60
2.51
27 1.13
4.4
JUL. 4.70
60
2.82
26 1.22
4.3
AUG. 4.83
61
2.95
31 1.50
3.9
SEP. 3.82
66
2.52
32 1.22
3.2
OCT." 3.44
62
2.13
30 1.03
2.4
NOV. 2.95
55
1.62
25 0.74
1.7
DEC. 3.80
.57
2.17
23 0.87
1.7
Try 6 months:
September through
February Surface
Runoff
Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface
Runoff Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.45"*
12 in/ft
34,434 sq
ft = 28,494
cuft

i 2.
3.
ID
�s
Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 - 12.3 = 9.2" = 0.8 ft/6 month.
25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 34,434 sq ft = 14,089 cu ft
12"/ft
4. Volume of Waste
200 milk cows in freestall barn are on concrete 100% of
the time. loot of the manure produced will be collected in
the waste storage pond.
Volume =200 cows* 14.0 oral/day * 180 days * loot
7.48 gal/cu ft
67,380 cu ft
35 dry cows and 80 large heifers will be on feed alley
less than lot of the time. it is estimated that lot of the
manure produced by these cattle will be collected.
Volume =35 cows * 14.0 gal/day * 180 days * lot
7.48 gal/cu ft
1,179 cu ft
Volume =80 heifers * 9.0 Sal/day * 180 days * lot
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 1,733 cu ft
Total 67,380 cu ft + 1,179 cu ft + 1,733 cu ft= 70,292 cu ft
5. 25 yr -24.hr rainfall on the pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
6. Milking Parlor Wash Water
"i. Pipeline and milker wash water 200 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 50 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water (Flush) 2,000 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50 gal./day
2,300 gal./day
Volume = 2,300 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
= 55,348 cu ft

. 7. Freeboard & ESW = 1.0 ft See design in field Office
file for freeboard and emergency spillway depth
designed.
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1. Surface Runoff 35,725 cu ft
2. Unsurface Runoff 0 cu ft
3. 25 year - 24 hour runoff 14,089 cu ft
4. Manure 70,292 cu ft
5. Milking Parlor Wash Water 55,348 cu ft
TOTAL 175,454 cu ft
4. Rainfall minus Evaporation 0.8 ft
5. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall .5 ft
6. Freeboard & Emergency Spillway 1.0 ft
Total 2.3 ft
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
162' X 178'
2.3'
,18 wide 2.2:1 10.1' 2,3:1
nar. 1.8:Z
/2.3:1
111' X 122'
Volume = 10.1/6[111 X 122 + 152.4X 167.5 + 4(131.7 X 144.8)]
= 194,172 cu ft
This pond has 6 months of storage. Approximately 18,000 cu
ft of storage is available for solids accumulation or volume
that cannot be pumped.
Normal Pump Out Volume
35,725 + 70,292 + 55,348 + .8' X 162' X 178,
= 184,434 cu ft per 180 days
= 373,991 cu ft per 365 days
"= 2,797,000 gallons per year
103 ac-in per year
Maximum pump out level
0.5' + 1.0' + 14,089/(154' X 1701) = 2.1'

D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should -be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2.1 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is 1.0 foot below the
top of dam.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot and freestall barns. The District
Conservationist will design all diversions. Diversions
shall be designed to carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus
capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. Runoff from
heavy use areas and lounging areas will be directed across
well maintained grass sods. Heavy use areas and lounging
areas will be located to provide the maximum grass filter
possible. Grass filters shall be at least 100' wide below
lounging areas and heavy use areas. Swells or diversions
shall be constructed and maintained along fence lines to
kick water into filters at frequent intervals.
A. Day old to 200 lb Heifer Group
30 young heifers are housed in hutches near the milking
herd. Approximately 75t of the manure is collected and
spread regularly.
a
Volume
of manure=30 calves*1.5 gal/hd/dav* 365 days*.75= 1646 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
U

B. 200 to 400 lb Heifer Group
30 young heifers are housed in sheds near the old
milking facility. loot of the manure is collected and
spread regularly.
Volume of manure=
30 calves*3.0 aal/hd/day* 365 days*100%= 4,392 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
C. 400 to 600 lb Heifer Group
25 heifers 400 to 600 lbs are housed in shed located
between milking parlor and old milking facility. Manure
will be stored under roof in a manure pack at fed bunk.
100% of the manure is collected and spread.
Volume
of manure=25 calves*5.0 gal/hd/dav*365 days*100%-= 6,100 cuft
7.48 gal/cu ft
D. 600 to 1,200 lb Heifer Group
Eighty large heifers are housed on 90 plus acres of
pasture. They will be fed silage on a new concrete feed
alley located at freestall barn. A 12:51 wide stock trail
will be constructed from feed alley to pasture. See
drawings for location and length.
E. Dry Cows
An average of 35 cows are located on a 7 acre pasture -
lounging area beside the milking parlor. They will be fed
in a new concrete feed alley located next to freestall barn.
A 20' X 40' heavy use area will be located at entrance to
feed alley. A water tank will be located on this heavy use
area. Hay will be fed in a ring. A 40' X 40' heavy use
area will be installed on ridge in pasture to feed hay .
Runoff from the heavy use area and bare lounging area will
be diverted into 100' of vegetative filter area.
Approximately 10% of the manure will be collected from the
heavy use area and spread regularly.
Volume of Manure
=35 animals * 14 gal/hd/day * 365 days* 10% = 2,391 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft

0
1�
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure will be stored in a waste storage pond for 6
months and will be irrigated.
During the course of one year, this facility will store
103 ac-in of slurry waste. Daily scraping of waste is
required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at other
parts of the farm:
1. Day old to 200 lb Heifers
2. 200 to 400 lb Heifers
3. 400 to 600 lb Heifers
4. Dry Cows
1,646
cu ft
4,392
cu ft
6,100
cu ft
2,391
cu ft
Total 14,529
cu ft
If all of one years waste were spread using a 200 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 73 loads.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off from the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from heavy use areas, lounging areas and trench
silos will be diverted through grass filter areas. Grass
sods will be maintained all year round. These areas maybe
controlled grazed in late spring and early fall when ground
is dry. Weeds may require chemical control or periodic bush
hogging. Grass filters below heavy use areas will be
maintained in a good grass sod. Filter areas below heavy
use areas shall be graded to establish shallow flows.
d

C.
Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and
manure analysis.
a.
Slurry Pond for Milk Herd
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N
35,438 lbs. 0.40 14,175 lbs.
P2O5
21,982 lbs. 0.70 15,387 lbs.
K2O
33,234 lbs. 0.70 23,264 lbs.
138 lbs PAN per ac-in
5.1 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
b.
Other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N
4,502 lbs. 0.43 1,936 lbs.
P2O5
2,791 lbs. 0.70 1,954 lbs.
K2O
3,916 lbs. 0.70 2,741 lbs.
C.
Total Available Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN
16,111 lbs `
P2O5
17,341 lbs
l
K2O
26,005 lbs
D.
Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a.
Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
CROP UNITS ACRES YIELD APPLIC. RATE
S.Grain Sit, tons 90 2.0 9,400 gal/ac
Corn
Silage tons 68 15.0 17,600 gal/ac.
b.
Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED lbs applied/ac (lbs. used/ac)
CROP ACRES N P2O5 K2O
V
Grain'Silage 90 80 (80)
Corn
Silage 68 150 (165)
C.
Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Grain Sil90 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNN
O
Corn
Sil 68 NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
N = not a recommended disposal period
t

/1 E. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage ponds and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
The waste storage pond shall be pumped before it
reaches a point 2.1 ft. below the top of the dam. Post
shall be set with the top at these elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage ponds shall be
mowed annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be
checked and repaired as required.
LO

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Doss Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May I, 2003
T.C. Williams
T.0 Williams Farm
139 Burke Farm Loop
Union Grove NC 28689-9205
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490017
T.0 Williams Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear T.C. Williams:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 6, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T.C.
Williams, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous. COC Number AWC490017 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the T.0 Williams Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy, 35 Dry, 80 Heifer, 85 Calf cattle and the application to land
as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COG shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Pernttee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. AMA
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpl/h2o,enr,state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal opportunity Action Employer 50% recyeled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. if you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490017
NDPU Files
NC DEPT. 0P ENARON
ANDNAT WA,. RESOURCES
NWRESVILLc Ra=GIONAl_
�a
MAY 1 9 2003
ATE

tV:l:. L%ILf' I'. 46.O
MrMltONMENT. HlrALTM
* NATLm.',L :t]",SOURCM
MAR _ ` ?900
�1MA 4F V,:: RA!t�stlltl�j
1{IUAESti'il4 �,;;��'L rlirl
State of North Carolina
RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY( SECTION
NOV A 7 1999
Non.Discharge Permitting
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing Information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: T.0 Williams Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: T.C. Williams
1.3 Mailing address: 139 Burke Farm Loop
City, State: Union Grove NC I Zip: 28689-9205
Telephone Number (include area code): 592-2338
1.4 County where facility is located; Iredell
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the Iocation of the farm identified): Go North from Statesville NC on Hwy. NC 115 about 20
miles to Linney Mill Rd. Turn Lt. on Linney Mill Rd. GO about 2 miles to Burke Rd. and Turn Lt. on Burke Rd. and then
go about 1/4 mile to first house on the left.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/55
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 49 (county number); 17 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy 1L
200- Certified Des' Capacity sue' a#,*C ACd
Is the above information correct? yes; �no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
6
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals TYge of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No —of -Animals
• Wean to Feeder • Layer • Dairy
• Feeder to Finish • Non -Layer • Beef
• Farrow to Wean (# sow) • Turkey
• Farrow to Feeder (# sow)

Other Type of Livestock on the farm: ,10 Xr C.- No. of Animals: Q
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 49.17

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system)/7. /4i9..9- ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 161
2.4 Number of lagoon storag � (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drainspresentwithin 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or TO —)(please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? K/A
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? /V/p
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization PIan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for Iand application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
�w
w
FORM; AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 49 • z7

Facility Number: 49 - 17
Facility Name: T.0 Williams Farm
W'A�Rp�
N� AC�T}•SEC7701V
Nan. for,
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: ��ha go pe �,,
I, -[ _V(% 1 t 3 J (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2 ;attest that
this application for �. C _ 1.Vf )1 ' J, 4: _ . e f' I-)_(Facilityname listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to.mz;ft&incomnlet1'5 t--fi1
Signature
Date ` to — t 4 — ! /
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 4 of 4 49 -17

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
42' /% FaciIit Name 7 '- ('Ar"-/%� (&).11/ 4nff {�crfl7e'r,(Irj�
Facility Number y P
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for q 0 0 Date of Certification /l- i b - 7 I
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking+dry cows a 3 S'
Heifers an _
Calves IY51
Beef Brood Cows .
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL ANIMAL NUMBER 4-0 O **
C4 fvice ' Tp �/oawe �t tf erg.
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation,
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate, however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
/Farm owner/applicant r g
✓ SignatureDate
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature
Date
Technical Specialist //' /d - ?9
Signature Date
Phone Number (704 } 97 3G 7 G l

N"
a �
! � r
v
i
to
Bf�h
`yA
f R /
w
I d96
r s
V /
1,V,
\R
16 �
�15.96
1161
ie_S_? 1e29 2!30 ;1
3117 t30 T
le2115
~
`r0 � '!,', g •y 1e29 ,�'S i _ Hn�ka..i4e
111_3� P121
1�96
z
159.
YE Vaw 1614_i
PO'. 55 .
� 161
590 15
9
F
f
F
mwd
_WI
.7
HAeMOHY
, FOP. 670
cxw �ooe
L O�
4,
I
IMMWAINUUJrl\\I
l'-4) I

�r��r f. � y- - -t.�`"L. =• •T,Jr 'A t �Y' �;3 .4;. '�� .-1 ,,.' ` ",,,�•: .�,, _ 'r!_.
�'_,-� �. '�i;r.1.s `� .,,ki «4A�:c r r �• a x 'Y ��•�+ rd :;� ti 'r, _ S -
S• tlt a 9 • � �� i, l`
rM
_ '$ - '�ii r,} r' '� A Zrs w1 A.� k h. +�w fir•°?r+. ,'1. .. �'x
ti• a�3.+ f � � .G.r K-{s.I.-J+L�. _� J - i� 't a "`1 �.r. r � •�
s Yi�� b� t ��Q V.. f I S J n � .r• i� �- �'�I^Z� b
_
AW
,
rJR
-
� r
lee
�� � '��� • - •. '-'• .:�'rT �i,w_r,.2`+�S rrt +["i'4My�` "�f�-9 • - _ •-
IL
� � T - yr' `4✓v I ��' - �•����C' �' - • � _ - -. �"�` -� R�'' y
.z
� �! �` ''�i �• r +'4I, ,ate j.w'I' �..7"R'�,.+•��.'a .i; 'a _ - � �fYti: -• ' __ r w
� � 1� fir. ';' /•,�.�' �� � kr`�� � 5 :`c .

Animal Waste Management Plan Certific:ati CE IvftE D
(Plesse tti•oe or orint all information that sloes rim reuuire a sitznaturu)
EYistin, or .. New oc .: -• Expanded (Please circle one) OCT' 27 1998
General Information: WATER QUALITY SECTION
Name of Farm: 770. W i 1('t. m ] rCr r M F i:Qtr" C Ilanss EX
Owner(s) game; T. Lv f* Iam s Plho e No�°4-S9Z- 733�
Nfaiiina address: 1351 Burk,- Form o 0
Farm Location: Count'• Farm is located in:
Latitude and Lonaicude:36 C/ 3/ / 8 /D Integrator: '''/A
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions. miillepost. e.c.): /_/"'Y /l S41 of J__/1t 4.rt;r/%. 444 gn SR- /598'+ jo
7'L4r/1 (eP an Fur& F-4pm )P`U. /-04)47ry leek /14i{.
i
Operation Description:
I: pe of swine c4'o. of Animals
:1 Wean to Feeder
:2 Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
C1 Farrow to Finish
M GiIts
ZI Boars
7'ipe of Poultry No. of Animals
-1 Laver
3 Pullets _
Other Tvpe of Livestock:
7: pe of Cattle
No. of Art pals
Z Dairy
:I Beef
Caws
.i!S
f{�i {• r s."' '
8"i7
.Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: y/ 9� Required Acreage: �G
Number of Lagoons I Storage Ponds: Total Capacity: 14, Y3 ¢ Cubic Feet (fN�6 .ho.,fi4f
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPPUY FIELD (please circle one)
pit tlt yea is �dt tk is �. �N pia as yt �M �M sa �It �t pia at at st ale at pit tt Xt pit �N at as +�a pit at is era M,i tk o!a Mt w �1e �!t �!a t!t pia eft pia o!t is +N tia as hit as hit at as pia pia pia lit is a'a �a is t!a ri as �k �h.(t at.A ik +F„oa i� qt a} pia �a r't
Owner / Manager A;reement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be undated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certifcadon to be submitted to the Division or
Environmental Manaeemem before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or applicationsystem to surface waters of the state tither directly through a mace -made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. '-t-hour storm and there must not be run-off from dtz
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized u_sins technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical, specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notificadon to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land O� T. C. Wig%urns
Sig.nature: �. Gt✓ �7t'� Date: let 7
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Si;nature:
Date:
.k%vc -- Au.1st 1. 1991

%C. %dJ �• tiw.s l�a� vy
Technica•1 Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15 A
NCAC 6F .0005. I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Managernen•
(DEM) as specified in 13A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or Lt.
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may si;n each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC. 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which thev are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Coilection. Storage. Treatment Svstem
Check rive appropriare box
J Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: storage capability consistent with w see utilization
requirements.
Y New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to tweet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): S Mae l
Affiliation a.SDX - /yI&S Date Work- om�� d: _ 10-Z%9 7'
.X
Address (Agency): / m oZ G� .. Rr / yG iy. /?lg, ., Sf. 1 ��' Phone
B) Land Anolication Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation L4 5 7)A - N ? C S Date Work Completed: 10 - 20 - q if
Address (Agent: ):_-V11 Wde,•-- Sib, JI/GIle- f W,C. 48G77 Phone No.:W4- 873-476/
Sic -mature: ate. Date: JeD ' '? 0 - IF
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check Me appropriate box
:2 Facilitv-without exterior lots (SD or WliP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
1`lethods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in .
accordance with technical standards developed by y'RCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prim): L a rr- y rl e nG rr)C
Affiliation U 5 D A - MfC S Date Work Completed: !a -
Address (Agency)- 26 N.C, .7,A 77 Phone No.:709'P7f-47-1
Siunature: Date: to - Z�- 71P
%VC -- August I.'1997

T: e- WtlltA/KS
D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
Existing or ex an in; facility with existing waste al22 cadQn equipment (WUP or 1) '
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan),
O New, ex2aUded or e3i5tillg.Facility without existing waste ao lick equipment for spray irrigation (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste ap2lication equipment for land spreading not using
�y irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 'F? ,n 0j t l I E U ] A 11
Affiliation G R A - NI A c- l us"i R , 6,A+,N Cb _ Date Work Completed: 1 R Z Ig
Address (Agency): A 3 t o N c- A L,rK 8o1 N,. M n�,its u, I le- Phone No.: 33 - 9 9 8 -3a 3 2,
Signature: C tj n Date: /o -/V - 9B'
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Ni fortality Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD.
SI. WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L a r'' Y yc'lalri)c
Affiliation USDA d S Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency : �a t W d'�e�- Sfi „ 7-t4,ef�i//� N, C. 4 Phone No.:70f 473.6 76 f
Signature: � � Date:
/0- �• 9�
F) Written Notice'of New or Expanding Swine Farm N/A
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
31, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was It constructed or Iast
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners dnd all property owners
who own property Iocated across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance.with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 3

T.c-W,l1,'a„,.,s
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SI) �
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been instalb
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): S4^1 use. 1 C,
Affiliation US0a - VRC-S Dare Worn C le ed. /o - z-9B
Address (Agency) _��. z�z F«�. B/.�.�� /? � 1.� �►., I�&bone /Vo. B,—Egy z
Signature:,
B) Land Ap Ip ication Site (W P)
Check the appropriate box
/o —/3-98
l The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
:..I Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed corer crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
0 Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 d,
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L arrY h'e nd rrF
Affiliation u sDrl - N AFC, 5 Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Zm < Phone No.:101- P'73 -6 76l
S iQnature:
ace: /D- S- 4P
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked. N%A
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DENI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
ANVC -- August 1. 1997 4

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
".Facility with exterior lots -
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants From lounging and Heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.. .
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L a r"X /4_1� d rf x
Affiliation USDA - y�PCS Date Work Completed: /b- P- fS-
Address (Agenc a r 60,r �` Al Nc. -UZ/ 7 Phone No.:7ef- e 7 3 - G 76/
Signature: ` Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or n
Check the appropriate block
V Animal . waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Anim:,l waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be- *land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): n rim t -V i. &, I t
Affiliation CAA-rflac- �s a,l.�_ G�_ Date Work Completed: _ 19
Address (Agency):3.31Q NC w-$o( N•,Mhr_ C U,Ae N L Phone No.: 336-lit -323 z
Signature: 1A-) QJ Date: ZP / 4 - 9 Y
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D.
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (wd) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM. N/,g
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owtrer):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and ylortality Management (SD. SI. WUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry 9,-,) pf,x
Affiliation N,QC 5 Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency ,ZO t�a.elrt•�- .SZ` .ffac'�r1 y/�I N: C° , a t'G Phone No.: p % 3 - 6 7 (a /
Signature: Date: /6- t - �y
AWC. August 1, 1997 5

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the folio -wing address:
Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29-35
Raleigh, NC 27626.0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Nianagement Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with Your Animal Waste Management Plan.
A%VC -- August 1. 1997 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
T, , {� hereby give Y al.•.r.� (Jrr permission to apply animal
to frorrdiis ante Utilization System on ib f acres of my land for the duration of time shown
below under Term of Agrement. DN 7XP► ,-r
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other trace elements and
when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of waste will
reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Landowner:46a22it�Date:
Waste Producer:
Technical Repre;
SWCD Representative:
ate: 4-1000
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19— to , 20.
(Mnimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)

State of North Carolina
IT
Department of Environmentfflk�X;W'A,� •
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality EL
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor fNCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary 1
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 22, 2000
T.C. WILLIAMS
T.0 WILLIAMS FARM
139 BURKE FARM LOOP
UNION GROVE, NC 28689-9205
N.C. UItpT. 4W
adVIRONMENT, HEALTH
NATURAL RFSOOURCER
MAR 97 p000
1I SlUN of E"'RRNMENTAt MANAGEMEN
14RRRMIttE REGlUNAl. UFF[CF
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490017
T.0 Williams Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear T.C. Williams:
In accordance with your application received on November 17, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to T.C. Williams, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the T.0 Williams Farm Farm, located in Iredell County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 200 Dairy cows, 80 heifers, 85 calves, and 35 dry cows and the
application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC490017
T.0 Williams Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
subnvtted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
_i
err T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
IredellCounty Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Tommy C. Williams p
Location: 139 Burke Farm Loo Union Grove NC 2 6 R6 c \3�-� BEG
Telephone: [phone]pV
Type Operation: DaftyN�-p'�cha+�e P��►it��ib
Number of Animals: 200 Milking Cows
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure(s): One (1) Waste Storage Pond
Application Method(s):Irrigation and Slu= Tank
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to
prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required
for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. You must have the
animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content as close to the time of
application as practical and at least within 60 days of the date of application before
each application cycle. Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must
be analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for
five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Lime must be applied to application fields as recommended
by soil test to maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding
capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons
per acre per year. With special precautions, (see Required Specification
No. 4) waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per
year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is a violation of the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) .0200 regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop.
Otherwise apply waste no earlier than 30 days prior to planting a crop or
prior to forages breaking dormancy. Injecting or otherwise incorporating
the waste below the soil surface will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where waste is applied
shall be monitored and alternative application fields shall be used when
these metals approach excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by gation (method(s) of application) for
this is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to
alter the method(s) of application in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient
levels for various waste application methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for systems in North Carolina. Actual acreage requirements shall be
based on waste analysis reports from storage structures in your waste management
system. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your waste storage pond is designed for JBk days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every (6) Six -MONTHS.
If your facility is unroofed, in no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be higher than the maximum storage marker except in the event of a
25 year, 24 hour storm.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
K

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall
be operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of
an animal waste management system. The North Carolina Water Quality
Commission will provide training and certification of operators.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the Water Quality
Commission.
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ESTMATE OF PLANT AVAH ABLE NITROGEN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
The waste that will now be collected will be from 200 milk cows on concrete
100 percent of the time. 35 dry cows will be collected for about 10 percent
of the time and 80 large heifers will also be collected for 10 percent of the
time.
Summary:
Surface runoff
Unsurface Runoff
25 year- 24 hour runoff
Manure
Parlor wash water
Rainfall, 24 hr storm, freeboard
35,725 cu ft
0 cu ft
14,089 cu ft
70,292 cu ft
55,348 cu ft
184,434 cu ft
Totals: 184,434 cu ft per 180 days = 373,991 cu ft per year =
2,797,000 gallons per year = 103 ac in per year
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM SOLID WASTE
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
Day
old to 200 pound heifers
1,646
cu ft
200
to 400 pound heifers
4,392
cu ft
400
to 600 pound heifers
6,100
cu ft
Dry
Cows
2.391
cu ft
Total
14,529
cu ft
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Total animal waste and waste water volume generated in one year
is approximately 14,529 cu.ft. and 103 acre -inches.
® 138 PAN per ac-in and 5.1 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
14.175 lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
+ 1,93Q_ lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
=16,111 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Values used above are based on analysis of waste from
similar livestock operations in North Carolina (source: USDA-
NRCS FOTG Practice Standard 633-Waste Utilization).
Actual nutrient content of the waste from this system may
vary from these values. Waste analysis should be made of
the actual waste as soon as possible after significant waste
accumulates in the storage pond.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over
applied white meeting the N requirements. in the
future, regulations may require farmers in some parts
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management
plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the infiltration rate of the soil at the
time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial
soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic
solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding
capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
It is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an
irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 through
3. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the
tables may make this plan invalid.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying forage plants under stress condition.
Nitrate poisoning may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is
recommended.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are available for
waste application. It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to apply waste
to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual nitrogen (N)
requirements of the crop to be grown based on the potential productivity of the soil
and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the Nitrogen that can be
reasonably applied to the crop and used by the crop in a timely manner using animal
waste alone. It will not be practical to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with
animal waste. Supplemental applications of commercial fertilizer may be required
during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient needs. It is assumed
that for certain row crops only a fraction of the total annual nitrogen requirement can
be applied using animal waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on each field
on the Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field application tables:
CROP
CODE
CROP
PRODUCT'N
UNITS
NITROGEN
REQUIREM-T
LBS./UNIT
CG
CORN - GRAIN
BUSHELS
1.13
CS
CORN - SILAGE
TONS
11.0
HCS
HAY, COOL SEASON, NOT GRAZED
TONS
45
HGL
HAY, GRASS -LEGUME MIX, NOT GRAZED
TONS
20
HSG
HAY, SMALL GRAIN, NOT GRAZED
TONS
55
PCs
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
13.34
OG
OATS - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
1.15
WG
WHEAT - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
2.05
n

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The following legend explains the soil codes which represent the specific soil types
that are found in the fields which are available for animal waste application:
SOIL
SOIL
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
CODE
TYPE
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
CfB2
Cecil fine sandy loam
(2 - 6 %eroded)
CfC2
Cecil fine sandy loam
(6-10% eroded)
CcB3
Cecil clay loam
(2-6%,severely eroded)
CsE2
Cecil soils
(15-25%, eroded)

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table I: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT NUMBER 587
Recommended
Lbs. N
Crop Realistic Lbs. N to be
Hydrant Pull Field Crop Anticipated Acresl Required Applied
No. No. No. Code Yield Useable Per Ac. To Field
4
1
4
PCS
4 tons
5.12
180
707
4
2
3&4
PCS
4 tons
7.93
180
1094
4
3
3&8
PCS
4 tons
5.23
ISO
722
4
4
3&4
PCS
4 tons
7.21
180
995
4
5
3&4
PCS
4 tons
6.71
180
926
4
6
3&4
PCs
4 tons
6.11
180
843
7
1
7
HCS
4 tons
8.19
180
1130
8
1
8
PCS
4 tons
6.2
180
857
8
2
8
PCS
4 tons
6.82
180
941
8
3
8
PCs
4 tons
5.2
180
718
9
1
8&9
PCS
4 tons
8.05
180
1111
9
2
8&9
PCs
4 tons
7.32
180
1010
9
3
8&9
PCs
4 tons
6.84
180
944
11
1
11
CS
18 tons
3.02
198
417
TOTALS THIS TABLE :
90.0
XXXX
12,415
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required
buffer areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N content
estimated at 138 The N per acre inch.
10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table I a: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT NUMBER 587
Recommended
Lbs. N
Crop Realistic Lbs. N to be
Hydrant Pull Field Crop Anticipated Acress Required Applied
No. No. No. Code Yield Useable Per Ac. To Field
11
1
11
HSG
2 tons
3.02
110
332
11
2
11
CS
18 tons
2.56
198
353
11
2
11
HSG
2 tons
2.56
110
282
11
3
11
CS
18 tons
6.2
198
857
11
3
11
HSG
2 tons
6.2
110
682
11
4
11
CS
18 tons
7.32
198
1010
11
4
11
HSG
2 tons
7.32
110
805
11
5
11
CS
18 tons
6.47
198
893
11
5
11
HSG
2 tons
6.47
110
712
11
6
11
CS
18 tons
7.32
198
1010
11
6
11
HSG
2 tons
7.32
110
805
11
7
11
CS
18 tons
7.32
198
1010
11
7
11
HSG
2 tons
7.32
110
805
11
8
11
CS
18 tons
8.05
198
1111
TOTALS THIS TABLE
85.5
XXXX
10, 667
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required
buffer areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N content
estimated at 138 lbs N per acre inch.
11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 1b: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT NUMBER 587
Recommended
Lbs. N
Crop Realistic Lbs. N to be
Hydrant Pull Field Crop Anticipated Acres1 Required Applied
No. No. No. Code Yield Useable Per Ac. To Field
11
8
11
HSG
2 tons
8.05
110
886
11
9
11
CS
18 tons
8.05
198
1111
11
9
11
HSG
2 tons
8.05
110
886
11
10
11
CS
18 tons
8.05
198
1111
11
10
11
HSG
2 tons
8.05
110
886
14
1
14
CS
18 tons
8.05
198
1111
14
1
14
HSG
2 tons
8.05
110
886
14
2
14
CS
18 tons
7.32
198
1010
14
2
14
HSG
2 tons
7.32
110
805
14
3
14
CS
18 tons
6.84
198
944
14
3
14
HSG
2 tons
6.84
110
752
TOTALS THIS TABLE :
84.7
XXXX
10,388
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required
buffer areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the
melds listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N content
estimated at 138 lbs N per acre inch.
12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Hauling
Using a Manure Spreader
Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Crop
Application
Rate
(loads/acre) I
Application
Amount
(loads)2
T411
1/22.7
Cecil
Corn
5
114
T411
2A/9.1
Cecil
Corn
5
46
T411
3/6.3
Cecil
Corn
5
32
T411
4/7.2
Cecil
Corn
5
36
T411
5/9.0
Cecil
Corn
5
45
T411
6/ 16.5
Cecil
Corn
5
83
T411
9A/4.0
Cecil
Corn
5
20
T411
1/22.7
Cecil
SmGr
5
114
T411
2A/9.1
Cecil
SmGr
5
46
T411
3/6.3
Cecil
SmGr
5
32
T411
4/7.2
Cecil
SmGr
5
36
T411
5/9.0
Cecil
SmGr
5
45
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SEMM AR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
NOTO 1bsN/Ac required for crop = loads/ac
(lbsN/ton(Waste Analysis Report) X ton capacity of spreader
2 loads/ac X Ac in field = loads
Apply manure on sm.gr between AUG-DEC and FEB-MAR and on Corn between MAR-JULY
13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Hauling
Using a Manure Spreader
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Application
Application
No.
No.
Type
Rate
Amount
(loads/acre) l
aoads)2
T411
6/ 16.5
Cecil
SmGr
5
83
T411
9A/4.0
Cecil
SmGr
5
20
T1417
1/4.5
Cecil
Corn
5
23
T1417
2/2.7
Cecil
Corn
5
14
T1417
3/7.2
Cecil
Corn
5
36
T1417
1/4.5
Cecil
SmGr
5
23
T1417
2/2.7
Cecil
SmGr
5
14
T1417
3/7.2
Cecil
SmGr
5
36
T1416
1/ 1.6
Cecil
Corn
5
8
T1416
2/5.4
Cecil
Corn
5
27
T1416
1 / 1.6
Cecil
SmGr
5
8
T1416
2/5.4
Cecil
SmGr
5
27
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SIMULAR TABLE WELL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
NOTE:1 lbsN/Ac required for crop = loads/ac
(lbsN/ton(Waste Analysis Report) X ton capacity of spreader
2 loads/ac X Ac in field = loads
Apply manure on sm gr. between AUG-DEC and FEB-MAR and on corn silage from MAR-JULY
44, /f

WASTE UTMIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Hauling
Using a Manure Spreader
Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Crop
Application
Rate
(loads/acre) I
Application
Amount
(loads)2
T587
16/6.0
Cecil
Corn
5
30
T587
16/6.0
Cecil
SmGr
5
30
T1397
1/32.5
Cecil
orn silage
5
163
T1397
1/32.5
Cecil 5
m gr silag
e 5
163
T629
1 /20.0
Cecil
Corn silage
5
100
T629
1/20.0
Cecil ES
m gr silag
e 5
100
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION
HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
NOTE: I 1bsN/Ac regykCfgr crop = loads/ac
(1bsN/ton(Waste Analysis Report) X ton capacity of spreader
2 loads/ac X Ac in field = loads
apply manure on am gr. between AUG-DEC and FEB-MAR and on corn silage MAR-JULY
15

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen to be
applied using animal waste for all fields which are available for waste application.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
ACRES
USEABLE
TOTAL CROP
NITROGEN
REQUIREMENT
IN POUNDS1
RECOMMENDED
LBS. N TO
BE APPLIED
USING WASTE2
SUPPLEMENTAL
OR RESIDUAL
LBS. OF N
REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1
90.0
16,244
12,415
-3,829
FROM TABLE 1a
85.5
13,161
10,667
-2,494
FROM TABLE lb
84.7
13.040
10,388
-2,652
From HAUL
256.9
73,730
35,980
-22,887
TOTAL ALL TABLES
517.1
101,312
69,450
-31,862
The fields or irrigation pulls listed in table 1-1B plus haul fields
above list all the available acres to apply waste. Odd areas, borders
and some of these pulls will also be used to apply the solid animal
waste collected. 2n any given yearthe producer may choose to not use
certain areas and his application records will show the actual amounts
and areas used. Only 16,111 pounds of PAN are available each year and
the available fields require 101,312 pounds of PAN. An acre inch can
only apply 138 pounds of PAN and system will only be run at .4
inches/per hour. Solid waste usually equals 7#N/TON. One load equals 6
tons.
This summary indicates that only about 1� 6 percent of the total annual nitrogen
requirements can be provided for the crops as listed for the fields available using
animal waste produced on this livestock operation.
l This is the required amount of N needed to meet the Realistic Yield Expectation for
the crop.
2 This is all the PAN that is available from the specific sources of waste produced.
16

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
In order to meet the 0200 requirements this dairy farm will be managed by
collecting 100 percent of the waste from the 200 milking dairy cows, 20 percent of
the waste from the dry cows and 20 percent of the waste from the large heifer
cows. The dry cow and heifer cow feeding areas will be moved to a new feeding
area adjacent to the freestall barn. This area will be curbed and waste will be
scraped to the waste storage pond. Waste from these cow groups will be collected
in the existing waste pond and will be agitated and irrigated to the crop and grass
fields as planned in the waste utilization plan.
Exterior calf lots will not be used as all calves will be housed under roofed
buildings.
The dry cow lounging lot will have a heavy use area installed for feeding hay and
another heavy use area will be installed near the entrance to the new feeding area.
The waste from these areas will be collected and applied to the fields according to
the waste utilization plan. In order to protect the lounge lot and to filter sediment
a vegetated filter area will be installed 100 feet from the streambank on the
lounging lot side and 25 feet wide on the pasture side. Stock trails will be installed
to cross the creek from the lounge lot at two locations for the dry cows and for the
heifer cows.
Other waste will be deposited in pastures and any additional waste applied to
pastures will be reduced to account for the waste received from the pastured
animals. The amount should be reduced 25 percent from what the realistic yield
will permit.
17

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
J;e-
for Trc�-�
Ina t I-r� g
�1
18

xt
46
' _
Y r•.
�C
_
w
r
...,
14
.,•. MCI'-.
,•�,.-_-_, a Sties �;
1
'
•
4
9
Y
....
_
_ - C.•tv..
..
_'- _ :-kir...�►i ten. ._-.,- ,,. •��
�. _ .. _,...
� .� _,:�.... k, ,
--�_ ..., ..� __
. +s.vti.'
,. t_. �.; �..... �-. _-�".

fir
i ; sr _ 7�+ OIC
=a•r ''.'� yam.
Aw
ml
15
,
�'•„+' � n,,; �:'"' .r� L. ` SL lr 1 .f_ �' '{rw �' �r< ���; • Y:fr .+';`'ri .' `�
W-.��+" � --� -- _, � 6 �'r � t?r�„C"` v„�r e't -4�• ti... r k. 7r. � �.^ �-r J-k ...V,� �-�'J
If �V - �ra. ... �'1 1",- T_" �'{`F �l t tr *r i3 a� � �• ' - '!
r• y, r. r�'y{+`�T'� r % .� f' .i^:o-� - - ' �', d7 '� ,i- �' 1 ' 'i � �a�:.,? . r'u 4� 1 °�. -
I
..�P. - �t�', +� 4 .- '� �•,a :'kj-. ����'i =mot' "i°r•,F+•- •'i��r -
.9 .

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�1, 5 opemfor
R�r W L<!- NLS
I £�LL --�.�
_• e..1.ai.4a�C�.4'V ;,t�.:CL��yt S. �-- Sr tag a
hLA,QQZI` Prfl. Q©6C3le U
- nOI �p r
ZZ
Plan ideaLLEcatdou CoNs D Cc�M LtA��ICPhotonnml�er �IIZ 3 on D:�t:cc
Ass:s:ed by S FIE RkC TiqT}A Ali rrrncarvnfT,,r,

Owner
County
Approximate Acres 33
Cooperating with
Plan Identification
Assisted by
� Operator T CI 4 (!f X 4-11'E �U; //("'
State - C- Date 3 -
Approximate Scale P=
Photo Number
r I)c
11

l-Uil,)L:NVAIIUi'i iI-AiN
Owner
County 1 -as& al
ApproximateAcres
Cooperating with
Plan Identification
Assisted by
7-
State
Operator TC1 q N4—lAe 06" R-r Aej
Date 3- /"P— Ff
cafe /= 6C-O,
Photo Number
N
. . . . . . . . .... .
�k
..... -----
......... .... :
®r
4f
J
4 ',-, �
I]

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Using a Traveling Gun
Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Crop
Application
Rate
(in./hr.)
Application
Amount
(inches)
587
3
CfB2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
4
CsE2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
8
CsE2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
9
CfC2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
11
Cfl32
CS
'0.4
0.6
587
14
CM2
CS
0.4
0.6
587
15
CM2
CS
0.4
0.6
587
7
CfC2
CS
0.4
0.6
630
1
CfC2
CS
0.4
0.6
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SIIM31 AR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
19

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
RE9UIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to
the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has a notarized long term agreement for
use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the
producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste,
he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a notarized agreement
(sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available
land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at
the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a
Resource Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). rf a RMS or ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will
be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in
addition to "Buffers" required by DWQ. [See FOTG Standard 393 -
Filter Strips and Standard 392 - Riparian Forest Bgffer j
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing or
any other condition exists which may cause a danger of drift from the
irrigation field. However maintaining residue on the surface will
reduce runoff and may be necessary to meet the soil loss requirement.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled crop and. When applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See 'Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the
Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
20

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
RESUIRED SPECg7CATIONS
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in
a method which does not cause drift from the site during application.
No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive to
odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the
plant. This is an important consideration where swine, poultry or
other ammonia rich waste is being surface applied. Surface broadcast
solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are matted.
Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25
percent of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a
concern where diluted, low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface
broadcast from a liquids holding structure. Where crops are severely
damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot assimilate the
nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur. The potential far salt damage from animal waste should also
be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple
application at lower rates should be used. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production & reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil, or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm
shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and
from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or
canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities sited on
or after October 1, 1995 J shall not be appplied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. (See Standard 393 - F`Ilter Strivs and Standard
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
21

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECLFICATIONS
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal
waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have
been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways which
discharge directly into water courses. If animal waste is to be applied
on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic
rates and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon/holding pond embankments, berms, pipe
runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these
areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon/holding pond
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon/holding pond
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved
closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal
discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be
applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during
the crop season.
21. Hi hly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top
anT bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain
the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- EOVMED SPECIFICATIONS
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining element. Zinc and
copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. Soil pH
shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for
five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC
regulations. North Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that
dead animals be disposed of within 24 hours in a manner approved
by the state veterinarian.
23

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:T.C. Williams Dairy Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or
construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than
the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation or other
equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this Waste Utilization
Plan. The equipment must be available at the appropriate time such that no
discharge occurs from the lagoon, holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage
structure in a 25 year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will
be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates
that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: T.C. Williams
(Please print) l
A�11
Signature: 6_(/�V_/ lip ate: _l0 io"7 '- �16
Name of Manager(H different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please printla y Hendrix
Affiliation:USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): Room 103 Iredell Agricultural Center
201 Water Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5200
Signature: 1p-n Date: 10 - 2 o - qF
24

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm.-T.C. Williams Dairy Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or
construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than
the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation or other
equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this Waste Utilization
Plan. The equipment must be available at the appropriate time such that no
discharge occurs from the lagoon, holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage
structure in a 25 year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will
be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates
that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: T.C.-Williams
(Please print)
r
Signature:- . Date: ✓ .7 7 "
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Speeialist:(PlesBe print)Larry Hendrix
Afflliation:USDA, Natural Resources Conse yatign Service
Address (Agency): Room 103 Iredell Agricultural_Center
201 Water Street
Statesville, NC 28677-520Q
Signature: aga�4 N=—nDate: 3- Z 7 - l k
Ofeeded only if additlonal land has to be [eased, etcJ
25

err as
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make. Model and Type of Equipment. 3
�.aN S(oo l+�AR11 J� se:. �00.ue=�e�. 1J6D 3% .Zo /10 a 111 / ,. 1•i�
Field Not
and
Hydrant No2
Travel
Speed
(R/min)
Application
Rate
(idhr)
TRAVELLANE
Effective Effective
Width (R) Langth (R)
:
Wetted
Diuneter
fee!
EQUIPMENT SETnNGS
Nouk Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Preswfe Arc
Inches Oun (psi) Reel Patt.3
£ C•.41.
-03"
S. Ls
A44 r
y q '
'
1-2-6
So
I If>
3
S.j 2-
4 - z
S1.2s
3kb '
to
I Z0
Sao
93
6b,
. A&
12.0
s Z.r
o'
Cog `
3bo'
j, 2-h
0
jxO
Soo
.
1- 5,
s.'ar
/,Up.*
o'I
.Z to
so
)AD
30o
-b
s,
009'
z3bol
1.1(0
e0
lao
Sao
- !
S.
a '
/d 31
3 O'
J. Z(o
Be
12.0
300
,
8-1
gas,
A'YO '
/a8`
3bol
.z k
80
110
300
6.2
'
1238'
'
I-a4y
So
1 z0
Soo
Z-
3
S.aS
4'
9-71
367011
..A(P
8D
lab
306
- J
X.
3-i'
3 (Po'
Aa CO
n
AD
3o0?.asr
-2-
2.S
W003
f
,d%
80
d
ao
3 Z
LAE
q
A&V
/!air'
3 bo'
.2
0
00
6.8
11- 1
+1'
q I`
3'
1.24
Ito
IR 0
3 0o
J. 0 2
1 J- 3
, a a
'
l/ d8"
360,
• 2-4
o
/010
300
q
A vy'
/3A
360
1.1E
go
MO
3O0
3 2
aG
/4J8'
3fo '
.r1
910
/a4
3oa
6.
P ib `
J3d8'
3 0'
.elb
90
/a p
3 an
7, 3 2--
I See attached map.
2Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each Geld.
3Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
MRCS, NC
TUNE, 1996

7. C.- &jJ# jZfil v „3 a 01 jA/
EXHIBIT D-2
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: 3
s e &vet r 3 /41b jop,& A-c.4go6 ,v
Field Not
WA
H t Nod
Application
Rate
(ink w)
TRAVEL LANE
Effedive Effective
Width R) tt
Wetted
Diamda
feet
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Preswre Prewere Arc
inches) Oun ( Reel pattem3
2� _
T IS.AyG �
cnmmnb
I1-
ks'ar
d
a►a `
3 '
, z
Erb
Z
300
. 3 a
J-8
k6�f
Sd$'
3 '
go
! 20
3 fl
8 • aS
A
/3 tf
3 /
1.Z
g0
MOa
`
1
3&oa
o
g,Os�
)3ag'
366,
I -Alp
80
OX0
300
sass
G'
)3a`
360/
$o
JAO
Soo
SZ
-
S.a,ry
A&y'
Jl �
3&1)r
(0
�d
a
oa
6 . $
I See attached map.
2Show separate entries for each hydrant location in cacti field.
3Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

T.C. C.+.�.1/.q ,us a �%2 y
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
.3 Isco
perating Pressure at Pump (p,%Q
Design Precipitation Rate (in/hr)
Hose Length (feet)
!1
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
4
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
13o
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
&S a
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
Ileslvner mev nrovide thrust Mark deleils on sens<rate sheet_
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.
900 Bend
Dead End
Tee
See USDA-NRCS Field Office Tecluucai
Guide, Section IV. Practice Code 430-131).
err D4
NRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

BIG GUN° PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY"
100 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
PS.I.
Nozzle
'5•
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
'55"
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
.6"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
.85"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
.7"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
.75'
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
.8"
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
.85"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
9"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.0"
GPM OIA,
50
50
205'
64
215'
74
225'
87
235'
100
245'
its
256'
130
265'
150
273'
165
200'
204
300'
70
60
225'
75
23B'
86
254'
103
263'
120
275'
t36
283"
155
295'
177
302'
PAW=
197
310'
MMMMM
243
338'
90
68
245'
63
25a,
too
270'
117
203'
1 135
295'
155
306°
175
315'
201
326'
223
247
335'
355'
274
304
362'
380,
110
76 265' 92 278' 111 290' 129 303'
15D 315'
171 324'
195 335'
222 344'
Available Only with 1`100 3 SH100,
100 R RING NOZZLES
100 DN DIFFURFH NO77LIFfti
.71 RING .77 RING .01 RING 86 RING
.89 RING
.93 RING
.96 RING
0.5 ON
0.6 ON
0.7 ON
0.8 DN
GPM VIA GPM DIA GPM VIA GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM VIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
GPM DIA
t(ewo
224
66 208 78 212 91 215 ��l
118 235
134 238
152 242
45 154
66 160
91 182
110 00
118 498
143 216
81 235 96 240 110 245 25 260
11H
141 270
164 275
183 280
— —
—
94 255 111 265 127 275 145 2B5
1e3 300
189 305Z236
11 315
100
105 270 124 280 1421=1 295 162 305
182 320
2t2 325
335
, .,, err,„•,.,.a,o,r,.,,,,o.,o,.,,,,,o�, „wo..,..,ro„e,o,.,�",o
150 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 240 TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
PS.I,
Nozzle
.7'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
8"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
9"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.0'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.1•
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.2'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
13'
GPM DIA.
60
110
265'
143
285'
1B2
305,
225
325'
275
345'
330
M.
3B5
380'
110
1218
290,
165
310'
210
335'
260
355'
315
355
375'
400'
380
425
465
395'
420'
440'
445
500
545
410'
440'
460'
100 143 310' 185 330, 236 355' 290 3T5'
120 157 330' 204 350' 258 375' 320 395'
385 420'
150 R RING NOZZLES
P.S.I.
Ring
b8'
GPM
DIA.
Ring
87
GPM
OWGPM
Rlnr�
1.08
DIA.
Rln$
1.19
GPM
DIA.
Rln$
1.26
GPM
DIA.
Ring
1 34'
GPM
DIA.
Ring
1.41"
GPM
DIA.
BA
110
26r1'
143
280'
182
300,
225
315'
275
335'
330
350'
385
385'
60
128
280'
165
300,
210
320'
260
340'
31 '-3d
380
380,
445
395'
100
443
300'
185
320'
235
340'
290
360'
355
380,
425
4p0' 1
500
415'
120
157
315'
204
335'
258
360'
320
380,
385
400'
465
420'
545
435'
"The diameter of throw is approximately 3% leas for the 211 trajectory angle.
200 SERIES BIG GUNS - 270 TRAJECTORY"
Inn T TADCQ 1I1`100 u171771 KC
P.S.I.
Nozzle
1.05'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.1"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.2"
GPM VIA.
Nozzle
1,3'
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
1.4'
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
I.
GPM VIA.
Nozzle
1.8"
GPM VIA.
Nozzle
1.75"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
19"
GPM DIA.
70
270 360'
3f0
380.
355 395'
415
410'
480 430'
555
450'
630 465'
755 495'
890
515'
90
310 390'
350
410"
405 425'
475
445'
545 465'
625
485'
715 505'
855 535'
1005
555'
1la
340 410'
390
430'
d45 450'
525
470'
805 495'
695
5,1155'
790 535'1
45 565'
1110
590'
130
370 425'
425
445`
485 465'
565
485'
1 655 515'
1 755
540'
B60 560'
1025 590'
1210
620'
200 R RING NOZZLES
1 %" Ring)
1 1S" Ring
1 i'h" Ring
1 44' Ring
1 V40 Ring
1 rh' Ring
2' Ring
sclua
(
GPM• actual.
1
ac1DIA.
GPM oil.
GPM aciOi1,
GPM" aCtDIA.
actual)
GPM DIA.
(
ARM actual)
PS.I.
GPM• DIA.
60
250 340'
33p 370'
385 390,
445 410'
515 440'
515 425'
590 455'
50440'
e75 470'
695 455'
805 490'
80 290 370' 380 400' 445 420'
100
325 3Bt1'
425 425'
S00 445'
S75 46�
480'
755 500`
900 520'
�8�80
120
355 4T0'
465 445'
545 465'
830 485'
725 500'
B25 520'
985 $45'
bW
53WROWMIMI
"The diameter of throw is approximately 2% less for the 241 trajectory angle, 596 less [or the 21" trajectory Angie.
The BIG GUN* performance data has been obtained under ideal lost conditions and may be adversely affected by wind, poor hydraulic entrance conditions or other factors.
Nelson Irrigation Corporation makes no representation regarding droplet condition, uniformity, or application fate.

d J
J
1
}
J
T8 . Yt-;' •
q\Ti
TB
y �
TB
f r 1
TB
LAGOON
YL
1
/ TB TB
TB
r 1 TB i
TB
J
THRi1°�' a rrKs ARE TO�BEL
EVER
(TEES
HYDRF
TB =
PIPE
TRENC ,
PIPE
200*
TR I -A
AIR 9
4

7z-t� 0: 4
IS P
O�IA
0
'N
i+fli N
lj,- fe mr.,w
0

t
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
T.C. WILLIAMS DAIRY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FARM SKETCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III
SYSTEM OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV
1. WASTE STORAGE POND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. GENERAL COMMENTS . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. APPENDICES (Waste Sample Collection Information, Specification
Sheets) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (END)
YI

C
Appro;dmata sails
A -� , r.Li
Photo a=Ler
Assists by
USDA Scil CcnsnZF-a,U*,-:l Se:-;:r-a
Ha
I-q
S
-1
. �.r,X-A
Z
0.7 1
-1
. �.r,X-A
0.7 1

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE
5. VEGETATED BUFFERS
5. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and stored in the WASTE STORAGE
POND (WSP). All contaminated water (wash,parlor and runoff) will be piped into the
waste storage pond. All waste contained in WSP will be land applied at agronomic
rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to provide 180 days storage for the
solid wastes produced by 200 head milking herd.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal
Waste Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24)
hour storm, as required under the Non -discharge regulations.
=I=

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff
and waste water from the milk barn for a one hundred, eighty (180) day period.
A permanent marker will need to be set indicating the level of storage available
prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 how storm capacity. The WASTE
STORAGE POND consists of an earthen dam, curbing and ramps for
discharging contaminated water into the WSP. The top of the marker will be 2.1
feet below the top of the dam at its lowest point.
OPERATION
The service life of the WSP will be determined by the level of management for
the entire system. Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in
the WSP. The accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity to a
point which requires removal of the solids for many years IF adequate waste
agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid
accumulation of solids which will reduce the usable capacity of the WSP to the
point that some form of dredging will be required.
MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as
needed to maintain a vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least
annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place only
when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a
height of less than four(4) inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District
office.
• ■- ; 1• 11
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of a tractor PTO driven
agitator/pump. An irrigation system is used to apply the waste to the fields
near the operation. Hauling may be necessary to convey the waste to the other
fields or to edges of irrigated fields.
See WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN for additional details.
1

ANIMAL 'WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
OPERATION
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full
storage level marker in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP
reaches the marker, liquids must be removed by pumping from the structure,
either into the irrigation system or to a spreader tank for land application. Do
not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate on
frozen or saturated soils. Irrigate only until soil is near the saturation point.
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly agitate the waste in
the Storage Pond. If application equipment (irrigation or spreader) is owned
consult owners manuals for recommended operational procedures.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receive waste application should have soil tested annually. It is
advised and recommended that waste and soil sample results be used in
conjunction with each other.
OVERVIEW
The heifer and dry cow feeding areas will be moved to a location adjacent to the
freestall barn. In order to collect waste the CONTAMINATED LIQUID
COLLECTION SYSTEM will consists of concrete curbing around these new
concrete feed areas. The curbs either allow the waste to be scraped against or
direct the waste and runoff into the WSP and preventrunoff of contaminated
waste.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION
SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed.
2

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
*41
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two fold purpose, they filter sediment from
the exposed feeding and lounging areas below the dry cow lounge lot and below
the stock trail to the heifer pasture. Their width is based on slope of land and
proximity to streams. It ranges form 25 to 100 feet and is identified on the
sketch. These areas can be control grazed or mowed for hay to prevent
unwanted growth.
Refer to the plan sketch for the locations of the VEGETATED BUFFERS.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within
the buffer. If grazing does take place caution should be practiced to prevent
overgrazing. rass should be a minimum of six (6) inches. These buffers
should have at least 80% ground cover. Specified width must be maintained.
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed according to NRCS standard 382
(Fencing), where recommended by the technical specialists. LIVESTOCK
EXCLUSION will be installed at locations as indicated on plan maps.
These areas are identified as the dry cow lounging lot/pasture and along the
stock trail to the heifer pasture. Other pastures will not need to be excluded.
3

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or
rot. If fencing wire becomes loose, re -tighten to original specifications. If fence
posts are rotted or damaged in any way, replace damaged posts with a post
which meets the
original specifications.
GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
A pump out marker will need to be placed indicating the level to start pumping.
It will be 2.1 feet below the top of the dam. Dry cow and heefer cow feeding pad
will need to be constructed along the edge of t a freestall barn at locations
shown on the sketch with a concrete floor and curbing. These areas will also
have a water tank installed. The existing feeding pads will no longer be used for
feeding. Fence will need to be constructedaround and along thelter areas to
prevent animals from causing damage to
the vegetation. In the dry cow lounge lot a 40, f t. by 40 ft. heavy use area with
watering tank will also be installed for feeding hay. A stock trail or crossing will
be installed for the animals to get across the stream. The heifer cows will have a
stock trail installed from their new feeding area to their pasture and it will also
include a stream crossing. Waste utilization plan will be followed and is
attached.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that
desirable vegetation is not adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any
pesticide in a manner not permitted by its labeling.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District if repairs or major
modifications are required for any of the components of this Waste
Management System.
Upon completion of all items involved in this plan, your operation will be
certifiable. This plan is for only the number of animals and acres listed in this
plan. Please notify the TECHNICAL SPECIALIST(S) that signed your Waste
Utilization Plan and Certification form if operational changes take place.
4

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DW9 704-663-1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 704-873-5353
SWCD 704-873-6761
NRCS 704-873-6761
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not
wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to consider
that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted -in an aerpssible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some
action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of Wastes. Depending on the situation, this may
or may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible
problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff
occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

4
i
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as
opposed to flowing leaks. Possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and
fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and
lagoon bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property
damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
gg Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
fi. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWG, (Division of Water
(,duality) regional office; Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency
number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your name,
facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement
of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that
have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone
number 704-873-5353.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 704-873-0507, Iocal SWCD office phone
number 704-873-6761, and local NRCS office for advice/technical
assistance phone number 704-873-6761.
empctpin.dex
Oct B. 1996
6

EMERGENCY ACTION. PLAN
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department
and explain your problem to them and ask that person to contact
the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem
to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: Church Brothergi Qrading
b. Contractors Address: Fairmont Road
c. Contractors Phone: [phone]
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage
structure (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: La= Hendrix
b. Phone: [phone]
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the system, and
reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with release
of wastes from happening again.
emit! 61a d"
Oct

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
7. e . L"J i Hams �D41r4 2.5e• wf
$uurce Cause WIN to N'iininnize Odor Site Specific l'rnctices
1=:uutslcad • Daily paoduction Vegetative or wooded buffers
e I(econmtcndcd best Inanngenlent practices
• v.13— Goal judgment and connmon sense
I'aml lots or bat it alley We( manure -covered surfaces CPT Scrape or flush daily
sun l;tccs
l Promote drying with proper ventilation
W-f
Routine claccks nod lnaintenlulce on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, Clock tanks
ticajdctl atcas
Uriuc
Pronlolc drying with proper ventilation --
•
Partial Itlicrubitd dcconaposM091.
Replace wct or mauture-covered bedding
Nlaame di-y stacks •
I :alial microbial decomposition
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Slorage I:nnk or basin •
Partial microbial decomposition ;
41
Bollum or mid -level loading
silt Face •
Mixing while lilting ;
sif
'Tank covers
•
Agitation when emptying
wd
Basin surface mats of solids;
41-
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
Agitate only prior to manure removai
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Solent, tIa5111 51N'faCCs •
Pattial ulictubial decomposition
O
Liquid drainage from settled solids
•
Mixing whip filling
❑
Remove solids regularly
•
Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry or sludge •
Agitation what spreading
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets •
Volatile gas emissions
4f
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manurc, •
Volatile gas emissions wllilc
❑
Soil injection of slurry sludges
sltn ry or sludge on field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs
Sul I:accs
a
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush lank covers;
liquid while larks are filling ❑ Mend fill lines to near bottom of tanks will
anti -siphon vents
Oulside drain collccliun Agilaliou during wastewater ❑ Box covers
or junction boxes Conveyance
Ak{UC - November 11. 1996, Page I

Source
Cause
HMI's to Mlnlmiae Odur Sile Specific I'rncliccs
Lill slaliuns •
Agitation during sump Iank
❑
Sump tank covers .
filling arnl drawdo% it
End ordmiupipes at •
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of pines undcrucallt
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level '
Lagoon surfaces •
Volatile gas emission;
❑
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
Iliulugical mixing;
O
Corrcct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
❑
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
0
Minimum agitation wile" pumping;
13
Mechanical aeration;
❑
Proven biological additives
I i igation sprinkler ••
I ligh pressure agitation;
od
Irrigate on dry days witit little or no wind;
nozzles •
Wind drip
AEf
Minimum recommended operating procedure;
9 f
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surrace;
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon;
A!r
Flush residual manure from pipes at end or
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals
Carcass decomposition
pr
Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water around •
Improper drainage;
P' Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities 0
Microbiai decomposition of
away from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public •
Poorly mni"lained access roads
Farr" access road maintenance
roads rrom rare, access
Additional Infunualion : Available From :
Cattle Manure Management ; 0200 Rule/BrAl' Packet NCSU, Counly Extension Censer
Dair y Educational Unit Manure Maungeincnt Syslem - Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory ; EDAE 209-95 NCSU - BAE
I,ngoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure'I'reatmenl and Storage ; EDAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater ; EBAR 106-83 NCSU - 13AE
Calihratiun or Manure and Wastc%valer Applicallon Equil)nteul ; EQAC Fact Shcel NCSU - BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Anitual Manure Manngeutenl: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperalive Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suurce Cause UMI's to Culltrol Insects Site Specific Ih aclices
Mush hullers
• Accumulation of solids 0
0
Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
Remove bridging ofaccunlulatcd solids at
Laguuus and fits • (:lusled Solids yl1 Maintain lagoons, scllling basins and hits where
pest breeding is apparent to miuimire the
ousting of solids to a depth or no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive VcgetalivC • Decaying vegelidiun 10 Maintain vegetative control along balks of
Quwlll Ingoons and other'impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative platter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
l ecdc�s need Spillage 111 Design, operate and (maintain reed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to tlliniruize the
accumulation or decaying wastage.
.!( Clean tip spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Iced Slorage • Accumulations uJ•ICcd 1'csidues J ' Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
43' Inspect for and reinove or break up accumulated
solids in filler strips around real storage as
nealcd.
AMIIC - November 11, 1996, Page

_W
i Source Cause MIS to Control Insects Site Specilic I'racticcs
Animal I luldinb A1cas • Accunnllatiuns of animal wastes 10 I;linlinhle Io►Y areas that trap moisture along
a111I ked wastage rcuces and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
miltimal.
&T� Maintain rencc rows and filler strips around
animal hawing areas to minimize
accumulations or Wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulatcd solids as
needed).
U1p A111mne I lanllling; Accumulations of minlal wastes 1Pr Remove spillage all a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems day interval during; summer; 15-30 day interval
during ► niter) where manurc is loaded ror land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
O'� Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
],of- male inro1n1ation contact the C:uoperalive Extension Service, Department or Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMIC - Nuvember 11, 1996, Page 2

Nlortality N.Management Methods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public body of water.
t Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
•�I Complete incineration
,Z� In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of A_nculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December IS. 1996
s

fi
h
1
. S. Department of Agriculture
oil Conservation Service
RECEIVED
WATER QU4f154§N*
September 1980
NOV f 1e� ,Ve: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DjZj'.harge Fe • .n9
Landowner C. L,-) ; 1�ry County Trca e
Community or Group No. _'—
Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of aam__L2- - Ft. Length of Flood Pool //� Ft.
Date of Field Hazard.1nvestigaticn_ di
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
st, Elev..:Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: !.and Use Improvements : Above . :Floodwater Above
_ : Flood Plain: Flood Plain
. fit,: Ft. - . : �� Ft. Ft.
2 : i�oao : 00 6,3 ' 1p19s`Toee*
3 - .
Describe Potential fe:r loss of life and damage to existing r probable uturg downstream
improvements from a sudden breach 795a Sc/�u -Se _ S'6 -Ay, -)' .00-a" Q--
_
Hazard Classification of nary (a, b, c) (see MEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classificaticn Q i1I. IV, V)— /(_ •�r�..� 6a.46M rre fo TP I
By. I :_: G� l^" "�..�_. Date - 0
Warne tit e )
Concurred Hy _ _ C _. �Date-.8`
NOTE: 1or re:,ey .e s!:ie
2 Atrej; ado--,,J .n: , l .heets as needed.

�8 II
,
I IN
--�• \D Ch I 11 .� \ �� BM
I I /As
♦ It. .�
111 1 J "o�� p 106�
�wC?\�i • v it v 7 i .\�• r?°m� t /w ,� ..-'� f � /� \�i:
W O
c ^,I,�I�III�(�1�1�� \\\ I I) If.� I�'l � �^ .��� % � �t�l•
tat
/p } 4 I� ,)r�1� �\ � �F-' ) 7 -�; : • Y•
t\•\� sq>` n \ .�rll\�•./ 1..� I ��i• III / ,, ,r�. �ll \'r� -= \ �I �`� I\� I

PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: T. C. WILLIAMS
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 200 MILK COWS
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
�. John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
I
APPROVED BY
DATE
a

r
Y
L
INDEX
I. Waste Production on Farm
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and:
Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Clean Water Exclusion
C. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for Dry Cows
D. Day old to 200 lb, 200 to 400 lb and 400 to 600 lb
Heifers
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for 600 to
1,200 lb Heifers
F. Silo Runoff and Leachate
G. Waste Utilization
H. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
A. Design Volumes
1..
Normal Runoff for 180 day period
2.
Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3.
25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4.
Volume of Waste
5.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
6.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
7.
FreeboArd + Emergency Spillway Stage
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
D. Pump
out elevation and ESW elevation
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
A. Day old to 200 lb Heifer Group
B. 200.to 400 lb Heifer Group
C. 400 to 600 lb Heifer -Group
D. 600 to 1,200 lb Heifer Group
E. Dry Cows

VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping System
b. Nutrient Balance
C. Disposal Calendar f
E. Operation and Maintenance Plan
Appendix
Dry Cow Herd Cost Estimate
Large Heifers Cost Estimate
Concrete Feed Alley Cost Estimate
North Carolina Archaeological Site Form
USGS Photocopy
Aerial Photo
Emergency Action Plan
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Design of stream crossings
Vegetation Specification
Treatment of Critical Erosion Areas with Permanent Ground
cover
Fencing for Livestock Exclusion
Construction Specification, Filter Cloth
Construction Specification, Concrete
Operation and Maintenance Plan by Field Office
Waste Utilization Plan by field Office
Drawings
Plan
View
Sheet
1
of 5
Plan
View Feed Alley
Sheet
2
of 5
Feed
Alley Detail
Sheet
3
of 5
Post
and Bar Feed Barrier
Sheet
4
of 5
Stock Trails and Stream Crossings
Sheet
5
of 5

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Production on Farm
Mr. Williams has approximately 200 Milk Cows confined
to the freestall and feeding areas. Slurry manure is pushed
into a waste storage pond behind the freestall and feedlot
area. Runoff from freestall and feedlot area flows into the
pond.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service assisted in
design and construction of the existing waste storage pond
in 1984 on the Williams Farm.
30 heifers day old to 200 lbs are housed in hutches and
sheds near milking parlor.
30 heifers 200 lbs to 400 lbs are housed in old milk
facilities.
25 heifers 400 to 600 lbs are housed in shed between
milk parlor and old milk facilities.
80 heifers 600 to 1,200 lbs are housed in pasture on
farm. An unroofed feed alley is located near a -drainage way
below the freestall barn. Runoff leaves the feed area
untreated.
An average of 35 dry cows are confined to 10 acre
pasture near the milk parlor. An unroofed feed alley is
located near freestall barn. Runoff from feed area
intermingles with lounging area runoff. This water
channelizes and leaves lounging areas with little treatment.
Runoff from one silo flows through a grass farm road
side ditch and then into a pasture. Runoff from a second
silo flows into a pasture. Flow distance is relatively
short to stream at second silo.
II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the waste production described above in a manner
that does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The
system planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to
surface and ground water by recycling waste through soil and
plants.
The following design and plans are required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
The storage period will be determined in the existing
waste storage pond. Manure for milk herd and dry cow and
large heifer feed area will be collected in waste storage
pond. Runoff from feed areas and milking parlor wash water
are also stored in pond. The manure slurry is irrigated on
cropland and pasture.

a�
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. Livestock Exclusion, Filter Areas and Feed Area for Dry
Cows
Untreated runoff from lounging area and hay feed areas
for dry cows will be prevented. Filter areas will be
established below lounging areas. These filter areas will
infiltrate part of the first flush and filter sediment and
organic particles. Seven acres of pasture will be available
for an average of 35 dry cows. Cattle will be fenced out of
drainage ways. 100 ft of vegetative filter will be
established below areas that will likely become bare in
winter time.
The silage feed area will be totally controlled. A
concrete alley will be constructed next to freestall
building to fed dry cows. Manure and runoff will be stored
in existing waste storage pond. Hay will be fed in a ring
on a heavy use area located next to feed alley in dry cow
pasture.
A stock trail from feed area to lounging area -pasture
will be needed.
D. Day Old to 200 lbs, 200 to 400 lbs and 400 to 600 lbs
Heifers
These 3 heifer groups will be Zook confined under
existing roof.
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for 600 to 1200 lb
Heifers
Eighty large heifers are pastured on the farm. 90 plus
acres of pasture is available for this animal group.. Cattle
will be fed silage at new feed alley to be located at
freestall barn. Manure and runoff from the concrete feed
alley will be stored in waste storage pond. Hay will be fed
in a ring on the ridge. Water tanks will be needed to water
animals.
F. Silo Runoff and Leachate
Silo runoff and leachate will be diverted through
vegetative filters.

;' .
waste Utilization
} Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
*� air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
t will be prepared.
H. Operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
Drainage area surfaced lot. Use average runoff values
in Ag. Waste Management Field Manual. Concrete channels
shall carry 25 yr - 24 hr runoff to Waste Storage Pond. The
drainage area was taken from old design. The drainage was
checked and found to be the same as designed. Approximately
6,000 sq ft of drainage area will be added to pond for feed
alley for dry cows and large heifers is added to lot.
Drainage Area = 28,434 sq ft + 6,000 sq ft = 34,434 sq ft
Surface = 34,434 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
%
DEPTH
%
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.,
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51.
27
1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 6 months;
September
through
February
Surface
Runoff
Depth 12.45"
Unsurface
Runoff
Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.45"* 34,434 sq ft = 28,494 cuft
12 in/ft

Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 - 12.3 = 9.2" = 0.8 ft/6 month
25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.911,
a
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 34,434 sq ft = 14,089 cu ft
12"/ft
4. Volume of Waste
200 milk cows in freestall barn are on concrete 100% of
the time. 100k of the manure produced will be collected in
the waste storage pond.
Volume =200 cows* 14.0 cTal/day 180 days * 100%-
7.48 gal/cu ft
67,380 cu ft
35 dry cows and 80 large heifers will be on feed alley
less than 10* of the time. It is estimated that 10$ of the
manure produced by these cattle will be collected.
Volume =35 cows * 14.0 gal/day
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 1,179 cu ft
Volume =80 heifers * 9_.0 aal/day
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 1,733 cu ft
180 days * 10%-
180 days * 10%-
Total 67,380 cu ft + 1,179 cu ft + 1,733 cu ft= 70,292 cu ft
5. 25 yr -24 hr rainfall on the pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
6. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 200 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 50 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water (Flush) 2,000 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50 aal./dav
2,300 gal./day
Volume = 2,300 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
55,348 cu ft

Y' ^
y'
Freeboard & ESW = 1.0 ft See
Free
design in field Office
g
n
file for freeboard and emergency spillway depth
designed.
Summary of Design Volumes
Surface Runoff
35,725
cu ft
,�-
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0
cu ft
3,
25 year - 24 hour runoff
14,089
cu ft
4.
Manure
70,292
cu ft
S.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
55,348
cu ft
TOTAL
175,454
cu ft
4.
Rainfall minus Evaporation
0.8 ft
5.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall
.5 ft
6.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
1.0 ft
Total
2.3 ft
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
162' X 178'
2.3'
wide 2.2:1 10.1' 2.3:1
nar. 1.8:1 2.3:1
111' X 122'
Volume = 10.1/6[111 X 122 + 152.4X 167.5 +'4(131.7 X 144.8)]
= 194,172 cu ft
This pond has 6 months of storage. Approximately 18,000 cu
ft of storage is available for solids accumulation or volume
that cannot be pumped.
Normal Pump Out Volume
35,725 + 70,292 + 55,348 + .8' X 162' X 178'
= 184,434 cu ft per 180 days
= 373,991 cu ft per 365 days
= 2,797,000 gallons per year
= 103 ac-in per year
Maximum pump out level
0.5' + 1.0' + 14,089/(154' X 1701) = 2.1'

pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2.1 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is 1.0 foot below the'
top of dam.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot and freestall barns. The District
Conservationist will design all diversions. Diversions
shall be designed to carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus
capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. Runoff from
heavy use areas and lounging areas will be directed across
well maintained grass sods. Heavy use areas and lounging
areas will be located to provide the maximum grass filter
possible. Grass filters shall be at least 100, wide below
lounging areas and heavy use areas. Swells or diversions
shall be constructed and maintained along fence lines to
kick water into filters at frequent intervals.
A. Day old to 200 lb Heifer Group
30 young heifers are housed in hutches near the milking
herd. Approximately 75% of the manure is collected and
spread regularly.
Volume
of manure=30 calves*1.5 gal/hd/day* 365 days*.75= 1646 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft

200 to 400 lb Heifer Group
30 young heifers are housed in sheds near the old
milking facility. 100t of the manure is collected and
i' spread regularly.
volume of manure=
30 calves*3.0 gal/hd/dav* 365 days*100t= 4,392 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
C. 400 to 600 lb Heifer Group
25 heifers 400 to 600 The are housed in shed located
between milking parlor and old milking facility. Manure
will be stored under roof in a manure pack at fed bunk.
100% of the manure is collected and spread.
Volume
of manure=25 calves* .0 a hd da *365 days*100t= 6,100 tuft
7.48 gal/cu ft
D. 600 to 1,200 lb Heifer Group
Eighty large heifers are housed on 90 plus acres of
pasture. They will be fed silage on a new concrete feed
alley located at freestall barn. A 12.5' wide stock trail
will be constructed from feed alley to pasture. See
drawings for location and length.
E. Dry Cows
An average of 35 cows are located on a 7 acre pasture -
lounging area beside the milking parlor. They will be fed
in a new concrete feed alley located next to freestall barn.
A 201 X 40' heavy use area will be located at entrance to
feed alley. A water tank will be located on this heavy use
area. Hay will be fed in a ring. A 40' X 40' heavy use
area will be installed on ridge in pasture to feed hay .
Runoff from the heavy use area and bare lounging area will
be diverted into 100' of vegetative filter area.
Approximately 10* of the manure will be collected from the
heavy use area• and spread regularly.
Volume of Manure
=35 animals * 14 al hd d * 365 days* 10t = 2,391 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft

y
4
Y;F'1r
3 VI. Waste Utilization Plan
r
:.
. A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure will be stored in a waste storage pond for 6
months and will be irrigated.
y' During the course of one year, this facility will store
103 ac-in of slurry waste. Daily scraping of waste is
required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at other
parts of the farm:
1. Day old to 200 lb Heifers 1,646 cu ft
2. 200 to 400 lb Heifers 4,392 cu ft
3. 400 to 600 lb Heifers 6,100 cu ft
4. Dry Cows 2,391 cu ft
Total 14,529 cu ft
If all of one years waste were spread using a 200 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 73 loads.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off from the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from heavy use areas, lounging areas and trench
silos will be diverted through grass filter areas. Grass
sods will be maintained all year round. These areas maybe
controlled grazed in late spring and early fall when ground
is dry. Weeds may require chemical control or periodic bush
hogging. Grass filters below heavy use areas will be
maintained in a good grass sod. Filter areas below heavy
use areas shall be graded to establish shallow flows.

C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Pond for Milk Herd
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 35,438 lbs. 0.40 14,175 lbs.
P205 21,982 lbs. 0.70 15,387 lbs.
K20 33,234 lbs. 0.70 23,264 lbs.
138 lbs PAN per ac-in
5.1 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
b. Other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 4,502 lbs. 0.43 1,936 lbs.
P205 2,791 lbs. 0.70 1,954 lbs.
K20 3,916 lbs. 0.70 2,741 lbs.
C. Total Available Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 16,111 lbs
P205 17,341 lbs
K20 26,005 lbs
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
CROP UNITS ACRES YIELD APPLIC. RATE
S.Grain Sil. tons 90 2.0 9,400 gal/ac
Corn Silage tons 68 15.0 17,600 gal/ac
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED lbs applied/ac (lbs. used/ac)
CROP ACRES N P205 K20
Grain Silage 90
Corn Silage 68
80 (80)
150 (165)
C. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Grain Si190 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNN
Corn Sil 68
N = not a recommended disposal period

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Tommy C. Williams
RECE,VED
WATF-R n�rs;r ;�;'S� riiniry
FEB 2 9 ,200
Location: 139 Burke Farm Loop, Union Grove, NC 286hln Disc,�j�e pCFM tong
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 200 Milldng Cows, 35 dry cows, 80 heifers, and
(Design Capacity) 85 calves.
Storage Structure(s): One (1) Waste Storage Pond
Application Method(s):Irrigation and Slurry Tank
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in
the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. You must have the
animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content as close to the time of application
as practical and at Ieast within 60 days of the date of application before each application
cycle. Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must be analyzed at least
annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown. Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Lime must be applied to application fields as recommended
by soil test to maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�., ._u�'�'max+. _. .., _.....,:L-._�•.,�.G_..i.�-n'�..L.r.`Phi{.n•��_YL+a�ueb-�_�.��.a-:-a. 'b:'. �___�_-.- .,..._.._ ��.._. _. �.�''. ___
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding
capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons
per acre per year. With special precautions, (see Required Specification
No. 4) waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre
per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is a violation of the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop.
Otherwise apply waste no earlier than 30 days prior to planting a crop or
prior to forages breaking dormancy. Injecting or otherwise
incorporating the waste below the soil surface will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where waste is applied
shall be monitored and alternative application- fields shall be used when
these metals approach excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by irrigation (method(s) of application) for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to alter the
method(s) of application in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for
various waste application methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for dairy systems in North Carolina. Actual acreage requirements shall be
based on waste analysis reports from storage structures in your waste management
system. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your waste storage pond is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every (6) Six —MONTHS.
If your facility is unroofed, in no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
your structure be higher than the maximum storage marker except in the event of a 25
year, 24 hour storm.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance
in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
w

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall be
operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of an
animal waste management system. The North Carolina Water Quality Commission will
provide training and certification of operators.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 Hiles) adopted by the Water Quality Commission.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
k 6
ESTBIATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM LIQUID WASTE
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
The waste that will now be collected will be from 200 milk cows on concrete
100 percent of the time. 35 dry cows will be collected for about 10 percent
of the time and 80 large heifers -will also be collected for 10 percent -of the time.
Summary:
Surface runoff
Unsurface Runoff
25 year- 24 hour runoff
Manure
Parlor wash water
Rainfall, 24 hr storm, freeboard
35,725 cu ft
0 cu ft
14,089 cu ft
70,292 cu ft
55,348 cu ft
184,434 cu ft
Totals: 184,434 cu ft per 180 days = 373,991 cu ft per year =
2,797,000 gallons per year = 103 ac in per year
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ESUMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM SOLID WASTE
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
Day old to
200 pound heifers
1,646 cu
ft
200 to 400
pound heifers
4,392 cu
ft
400 to 600
pound heifers
6,100 cu
ft
Dry Cows
2,391 cu
ft
Total
14,529 cu
ft
6

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Total animal waste and waste water volume generated in one year is approximately
14,529 cu.ft. and 103 acre -inches.
138 PAN per ac-in and 5.1 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
14,175 lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
+ 1,936 lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
= 16,111 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Values used above are based on analysis of waste from similar livestock
operations in North Carolina (source: USDA -MRCS FOTG Practice
Standard 633-Waste Utilization). Actual nutrient content of the waste from
this system may vary from these values. Waste analysis should be made of
the actual waste as soon as possible after significant waste accumulates in the
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses nitro en. .
7

WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the infiltration rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the
available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available
nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
It is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is
installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 through 3. Failure to apply the
recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying forage plants under stress condition. Nitrate
poisoning may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are available for waste application.
It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to apply waste to each of these fields in any given
year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual nitrogen (N) requirements of
the crop to be grown based on the potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the Nitrogen that can be reasonably
applied to the crop and used by the crop in a timely manner using animal waste alone. It will not be
practical to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with animal waste. Supplemental applications of
commercial fertilizer may be required during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient
needs. It is assumed that for certain row crops only a fraction of the total annual nitrogen requirement
can be applied using animal waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on each field on the Department
of Water Quality Waste Application Record Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field application tables:
CROP i CROP
CODE i
PRODUCT'N
UNITS
NITROGEN
REQUIREM'T
LBS./UNIT
CG
CORN - GRAIN
BUSHELS;
1.13
CS
CORN - SILAGE
TONS
11.0
HCS
HAY, COOL SEASON, NOT GRAZED
TONS
45
HGL
HAY, GRASS -LEGUME MIX, NOT GRAZED
TONS
20
HSG
HAY, SMALL GRAIN, NOT GRAZED
TONS
55
PCs
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
13.34.
OG
OATS - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
1.15
WG
WHEAT - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
2.05

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The following legend explains the soil codes which represent the specific soil types that are found in
the fields which are available for animal waste application:
SOIL j SOIL
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
CODE TYPE
i
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
CfB2 Cecil fine sandy loam
(2 - 6%eroded)
CfC2 Cecil fine sandy loam
(6-10% eroded)
CcB3 Cecil clay loam
E (2-6%,severely eroded)
CsE2 Cecil soils
(15-25%, eroded)
10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table l: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT NUMBER 587
Recommended
Lbs. N
Crop Realistic Lbs. N to be
Hydrant Pull Field Crop Anticipated Acresl Required Applied
No. No. No. Code Yield Useable Per Ac. To Field
4
1
I 4
1 PCs
4 tons 5
180
707
4
2
3&4
PCs
4 tons 7.93
180
1094
4
3
3&8
PCs
4 tons 5.23
180
722
4
i 4
3&4
PCs
4 tons 7.21
180
995
4
5
3&4
PCs
4 tons 6.71
180
926
4
6
3&4
PCs
4 tons 6.11
180
843
7
1
7
HCS
4 tons 8.19
180
1130
8
1
8
PCs
4 tons i 6.2
180
857
8
2
8
PCS
4 tons 6.82
180
941
8
3
8
PCS
4 tons 5.2
180
718
9
1
8&9
PCs
4 tons 8.05
180
1111
9
2
8&9
PCs
4 tons 7.32
180
1010
9
3
8&9
PCS
4 tons 6.84
180
944
11
1
11
CS
18 tons 3.02
198
417
TOTALS
THIS TABLE
90 . o
xxxx
12,415
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer areas which
border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N content estimated at 138 lbs N per acre inch.
11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table IA: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT NUMBER 587
Recommended
Lbs. N
Crop Realistic Lbs. N to be
Hydrant Pull Field Crop Anticipated Acresl Required Applied
No. No. No. Code Yield Useable Per Ac_ To Field
11
1 •.
11
HSG
2 tons
3.02
110
332
11
2 j
11CS
18
tons
2.56
198
353
11
2
11
HSG
2 tons
2.56
110
282
11
3
11
CS
18 tons
6.2
198
857
11
3
11
HSG
2 tons
6.2
110
682
11
4
11
CS
18 tons
7.32
198
1010
11
4
11
HSG
2 tons
1 7.32
110
805
11
5
11
CS
18 tons
6.47
198
893
11
5
11
HSG
2 tons
6.47
110
! 712
11
6
11
CS
18 tons
7.32
i 198
` 1010
11
6
11
HSG
2 tons
7.32
110
805
11
7
11
CS
18 tons
7.32
198
1010
11
7
11
HSG
2 tons
7.32
110
805
11
8 1
11
CS
1 18 tons
8.05
198
1111
TOTALS
THIS
TABLE
8 5.5
XXXX
10,667
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer areas which
border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N content estimated at 138 lbs N per acre inch.
12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table IB: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT NUMBER 587
Recommended
Lbs. N
Crop Realistic Lbs. N to be
Hydrant Pull Field Crop Anticipated Acresl Required Applied
No. No. No. Code Yield Useable Per Ac. To Field
11
1 8
j 11
HSG
2
tons
8.05
110
886
11
1 9
11 j
CS
18
tons
8.05
198
1111
11
1 9
11
HSG
2
tons
8.05
110
886
11
10
11
CS
18
tons
8.05
198
1111
11
10
11-
HSG
2
tons
8.05
110
886
14
1 1
14
CS
18
tons
8.05
198
1 1111
14
1
14
HSG
2
tons
8.05
110
886
14
2
14
CS
18
tons
7.32
198
1010
14
2
14
HSG
2
tons
7.32
110
805
14
3
14
CS
18
tons
6.84
198
944
14
3
14
HSG
2
tons
6.84
110
1 752
TOTALS
THIS
TABLE
84.7
xxxX
1 10,388
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer areas which
border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N content estimated at 138 lbs N per acre inch.
13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table IC: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
411
Recommended
Recommended
Lbs. N
Lbs. N
Soil Realistic Lbs. N
Lbs. N
to be
to be
Field Type Crop Anticipated Applied Required
Required
Applied
Applied
No. Code Code3 Yield/ac Acresl Per Ac.
Per Fld.
PerAc/ld.a
Per Fld/ld
1
CfB2
CS
18 ton
22.7
198
4495
198
4495
1
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
22.7
110
2497
110
2497
2a
CfB2
CS
18 ton
9.1
198
1802
198
1802
2a
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
9.1
110
1001
110
1001
3
CfB2
CS
18 ton
6.3
198
1247
198
1247
3
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
6.3
110
693
110
693
4
CfB2
CS
18 ton
7.2
198
1427
198
1427
4
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
7.2
110
792
110
792
5
CfB2
CS
18 ton
9.0
198
1782
198
1782
5
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
9.0
110
990
110
990
6
CfB2
CS
18 ton
16.5
198
3267
198
3267
6
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
16.5
110
1815
110
1815
9A
CfB2
CS
18 ton
4.0
198
792
198
792
TOTALS THIS TABLE:
145.6
22600
22600
1 The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for.
N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what is available using the assumed application method at the rates
as indicated on page 20 "Narrative of Operation ".
3 Time of application for: CS - Mar -Jun, WG - Feb -May & Sep -Nov,
14

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table ID: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract 411 (9A)
and Tract
1417 (1-3), 1416 (1,2)
Recommended
Recommended
Lbs. N
Lbs. N
Soil Realistic
Lbs. N
Lbs. N to be
to be
Field Type Crop Anticipated Applied
Required
Required Applied
Applied
No. Code Code3 Yield/ac Acresl
Per Ac.
Per Fld. PerAc/ld.2
Per Fld/ld
9A
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
4.0
110
440
110
440
1
CfB2
CS
18 ton
4.5
198
891
198
891
1
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
4.5
110
495
110
495
2
CfB2
CS
18 ton
2.7
198
534
198
534
2
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
2.7
110
297
110
297
3
CfB2
CS
18 ton
7.2
198
1426
198
1426
3
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
7.2
110
792
110
792
1
CfB2
CS
18 ton
1.6
198
317
198
317
1
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
1.6
110
176
110
176
2
CfB2
CS
18 ton
5.4
198
1069
198
1069
2
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
5.4
110
594
110
594
TOTALS THIS TABLE:
46.8
7031
7031
1 The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for.
N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what is available using the assumed application method at the rates
as indicated on page 20 "Narrative of Operation ".
3 Time of application for: CS - Mar -Jun, WG - Feb -May & Sep -Nov,
15

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Ji
Table ID: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract 411 (9A)
and Tract
1417 (1-3), 1416 (11-2)
Recommended
Recommended
Lbs.""N
Lbs. N
Soil ealistic
Lbs. N
Lbs. N to be
to be
Field Type Crop Anti63,p`ated Applied
Required
Required-`" Applied
Applied
No. Code Code3 Yield%ac Acresl
Per Ac.
Per-Fld. PerAc/1d.2
Per Fld/ld
9A
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
4.0
110
-' 440
110
440
1
CfB2
CS
18 ton
.5
198
891
198
891
1
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
4.
110',
495
110
495
2
CfB2
CS
18 ton
2.7
- 198
534
198
534
2
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
2.7
110
297
110
297
3
CfB2
CS
18 ton
7
4
1426
198
1426
3
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
.2
110
792
110
792
1
CfB2
CS
18 ton
1.6
198
317
198
317
1
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
1.6
I10
76
110
176
2
CfB2
CS
18-t6n
5.4
198
low
198
1069
2
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
5.4
110
594
110
594
TOTALS THIS TABLE:
46.5
7031
7031
1 The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the Ids listed may, and most Iikely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables. /;
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N
must be based on realistic yield expectation. Eh gures indicate what is available using the assumed application method at the rates as
indicated on page 20 "Narrative of Operation ".
3 Time of application for: CS - Mar -Jun, WG - Feb -May & Sep -Nov,
16

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table I E: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
587 (16), Tract 1397 (1) and
Tract 629 (1)
Recommended
Recommended
Lbs. N
Lbs. N
soil Realistic
Lbs. N Lbs. N
to be
to be
Field Type Crop Anticipated
Applied Required Required
Applied
Applied
No. Code Code3 Yield/ac
Acresl Per Ac. Per Fld.
PerAc/1d.2
Per Fld/ld
16'
CfC2
CS
18 ton
6.0
198
1188
198
1188
16
CfC2
HSG
2 ton
6.0
110
660
110
660
1
CfC2
CS
18 ton
32.5
198
6435
198
6435
1
CfC2
HSG
2 ton
32.5
110
3575
110
3575
1
CfB2
CS
18 ton
20.0
198
3960
198
3960
1
CfB2
HSG
2 ton
20.0
110
2200
110
2200
TOTALS THIS TABLE:
117.0
18018
18018
1 The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will
be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N
must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what is available using the assumed application method at the rates as
indicated on page 20 "Narrative of Operation ".
3 Time of application for: CS - Mar -Jun, WG - Feb -May & Sep -Nov,
17

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
va
Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen to be applied using
animal waste for all fields which are available for waste application.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
ACRES
USEABLE
TOTAL CROP
NITROGEN
REQUIREMENT
IN POUNDSI
RECOMMENDED
LBS. N TO
BE APPLIED
USING WASTE2
SUPPLEMENTAL
OR RESIDUAL
LBS. OF N
REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1
1 90.0
16,244
1 12,415
-3,829
FROM TABLE la
85.5
13,161
10,667
1 -2,494
FROM TABLE lb
1 84.7_
13,_040
10,388
1 -2.,6.52
FROM TABLE 1C
; 145.6
22,600
22,600
FROM TABLE 1D
1 46.8 i
7,031
i 7,031
FROM TABLE lE
117.0
18,018
18,018
-
TOTAL ALL TABLES
569.6
90,094
81,119
-8975
The fields or irrigation pulls listed in table 1-lB plus haul fields
above list all the available acres to apply waste. odd areas, borders
and some of these pulls will also be used to apply the solid animal
waste collected. In any given year the producer may choose to not use
certain areas and his application records will show the actual amounts
and areas used. Only 16,111 pounds of PAN are available each year and
the available fields require 90,094 pounds of PAN. An acre inch can
only apply 138 pounds of PAN and system will only be run at .4
inches/per hour. Solid waste usually equals 7#N/TON. One load equals 6
tons.
This summary indicates that only about 18 percent of the total annual nitrogen requirements can be
provided for the crops as listed for the fields available using animal waste produced on this livestock
operation.
1 This is the required amount of N needed to meet the Realistic Yield Expectation for the crop.
2 This is all the PAN that is available from the specific sources of waste produced.
18

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
In order to meet the 0200 requirements this dairy farm will be managed by collecting 100 percent of
the waste from the 200 milking dairy cows, 20 percent of the waste from the dry cows and 20 percent
of the waste from the large heifer cows. The dry cow and heifer cow feeding areas will be moved to
a new feeding area adjacent to the freestall barn. This area will be curbed and waste will be scraped
to the waste storage pond. Waste from these cow groups will be collected in the existing waste pond
and will be agitated and irrigated to the crop and grass fields as planned in the waste utilization plan.
Exterior calf lots will not be used as all calves will be housed under roofed buildings.
The dry cow lounging lot will have a heavy use area installed for feeding hay and another heavy use
area will be installed near the entrance to the new feeding area. The waste from these areas will be
collected. and applied to the fields according to the waste utilization plan. In order to protect the
lounge lot and to filter sediment a vegetated filter area will be installed 100 feet from the streambank
on the lounging lot side and 25 feet wide on the pasture side. Stock trails will be installed to cross the
creek from the lounge lot at two locations for the dry cows and for the heifer cows.
Other waste will be deposited in pastures and any additional waste applied to pastures will be reduced
to account for the waste received from the pastured animals. The amount should be reduced 25
percent from what the realistic yield will permit.
19

Application of Waste by irrigation
Using a Traveling Gun
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Application
Application
No.
'No.
Type
Rate
Amount
in !hr
(Inches)
587
3
CfB2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
4
CsE2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
8
CsE2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
i 9
CfC2
PCs
0.4
0.6
587
11
CfB2
CS
0.4
0.6
587
14
CfB2
CS
0.4
0.6
587
15
CfC2
CS
0.4
0.6
587
7
CfC2
CS
0.4
0.6
630
1
CfC2
CS
0.4
0.6
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SI IMAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
20

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has a notarized long term agreement for use of adequate land on
which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate Iand to
properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a notarized
agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life
expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in
the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available
land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the
rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic
yield tables at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If a RMS or ACS is used the
soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter
strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in
addition to "Buffers" required by DWQ. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips
and Standard 392 - Riparian Forest Buffer.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing or any other condition exists
which may cause a danger of drift from the irrigation field. However maintaining
residue on the surface will reduce runoff and may be necessary to meet the soil loss
requirement.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
21

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine, poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent
of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a concern where diluted,
low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on
soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient'loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up
released nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple application
at lower rates should be used. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production & reduce the potential for pollution, the waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil, or forages breaking
dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a
lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an
irrigation ditch or canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities
sited on or after October 1, 1995 J shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 392 - Riparian Forest
Bu er
22

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior
converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways
which discharge directly into water courses. If animal waste is to be applied on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates and in a manner
that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon/holding pond embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed,
special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate.
Lagoon/holding pond areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon/holding
pond berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is.
responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved closure plan" which will
eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct
human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications
of animal waste during the crop season.
23

WASTE
UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment
lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the
markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for
waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and
alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels.
Soil pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and
waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application
records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations. North
Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that dead animals be disposed of within
24 hours in a manner approved by the state veterinarian.
24

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:T.C_and Charlie Williams Partnership Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require anew certification to be
submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system
to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed on -site at,the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation or other equipment, to land
apply the animal waste described in this Waste Utilization Plan. The equipment must be available
at the appropriate time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon, holding pond, tank, or other
unroofed storage structure in a 25 year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste
will be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no run-
off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: T.C.and Charlie Williams Partnership Dairy Farm
(Please print)
ff
Signature: ��� 'lJ�;6te:f --2Do4
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please prmt)Larry Hendrix
Affiliation: USDA. Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address (Agency): Room 103 Iredell Agricultural Center
201 Water Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5200
Signature: Date: G- Z`— Z° D O
25

M r,lY•"' � y��
�Ju
`,,i
Vie,;
rye ��;.
• f
OQ /•.- +
F'
Mill 4'
w
�
d -0
�M
'C
S
0
>roaw
In
aq ro
f
fa
cr
fi
n
r
a
z
A
LA
LN
t
g
a
f
O
�
b
h
�
3
M
r�
m
r0
CA
93
p
fl
�
d
P
�
n