BEN HOVIS POULTRY LINCOLN CO_MISC_20171231

JSF MAR 3 0
Control Number
County Number
1914 GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCE INVENTORY
Source Name
1�.
OWNERSHIP
1/IS Ov
,n
0Private
Source Address
2 Municipal
,.}
5ie 16 T
.(�
on TL.e si E'.
�j
S. iC 00
3 County
4 State
City
County
�!►'�L+0/1�
Region
+✓�Co�i«
5 Federal
6 Military
Owner/Operator
i Quad Name
TuTtiple Sources
a
County source s
YES NO
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
LOCATION
OPERATION TYPE
TYPE OF WASTE
DISPOSAL FACILITY
OTHER SOURCE
` n Facility
i Municipal
1 Gasoline/diesellO
Lagoon, etc.
1
Agricultural Activity
2 Highway
2 Industrial
2 Other oil
2 Landfill-contro.
2
Salt water intrusion
3 Railroad
3 gricultural
3 Solvents
3 Landfill-uncont.
3
Chemical stock pile
4 Waterway
Oil and gas
4 Corrosives
4 Land application
4
River infiltration
5 Pipeline
5 Mining
5 Other chemical
5 Abandoned site
5
Mine drainage
6 Dumpsite
6 Other Source
6 Sewage/septage
6 Sewer system
6
Intentional dump
7 Other
7 Sludge
7 Septic tank
7
Spill
8 Leachate
8 Injection well
8
Leak --above ground
9 Other solids
9 Disposal well
9
Leak --underground
Q In use
10 Gas
WASTE: /I
STATUS OF SOURCE: 2 Inactive
11 Pest/herbicides
3 Other
12 Fertilizers
POLLUTION STATUS AND CROSS-REFERENCES
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION
FACILITY PERMITTED: Yes No
1 Confirmed (T) Rank
1 NPDES
6 Mining
(2 Potential 2 Tabulate
No:
2 DEM Nondischarge
No:
7 Hazardous
Waste (RCRA)
MONITORING WELLS
No:
No:
1 No monitoring
2 State has data
3 Well Construction
8 Solid Waste
(Landfill)
3 Data at facility
No:
No:
Status unknown
4 Capacity Use
9 Oil Terminal
Registration
DATABASE CROSS-REFERENCE
No'
No:
1 ERRIS (CERCLA) list
5 UIC
0 Air Quality
ID:
No:
No:
2 Surface Impoundment (SIA)
Comments ►5 0' x 54' x ►o -)x' Palo
3 GW Pollution Source Inv.
Date:
4 Other DEM investigation
Date:
Compiler:
Date:

9
GR0UND41ATER POLLUTION SOURCE EVALUATION
R A N K I N G C P, I T E P I A
THREAT TO GROUNDWATER
Probability of Groundwater Violations
(3 Violations documented or highly probable
2 Default
I Violations unlikely .
Extent of Groundwater Contamination
3 Flappable, migrating plume
ODefault
1 Insignificant contamination expected
Seriousness of Groundwater Threat
3 One of most serious in DEM region
Default
I Not considered a serious problem
13 FEASIBILITY FOR TAKING ACTION
Feasibility for Remedial Action
(D Remedial action both feasible and desirable
2 Default
1 No remedial action recommended
Desirability of Remedial Action
3 One of top regional office priorities
02 Default
1 Not a priority incident
.D THREAT TO PEOPLE OR ECONOMY
How Hazardous to Health/Economy
3 People or business advised of contamination
ODefault
I No expected impacts on people or business
Number of People at Risk
3 4 or more family units, or $10,000 loss
ODefault
1 No people or other interests at risk
Seriousness of People Threat
3 Strong DEM concern over threat to people
0 Default
I No threat to people or economy
- -.) FEASIBILITY OF RECLASSIFYING GROUNDWATER
Need to Reclassifv Groundwater
3 Groundwater should be relassified RS or GC
0 Default
1 No reclass. nor remedial action recommended
Desirability of Reclassification
3 One of top reclassification priorities
0 Default
1 Not a priority incident
`'THREAT OF POLLUTANTS
How Toxic are Pollutants (use Sax)
3 High value
0 Mod value
1 Law or None value
Quantity of Pollutants in Ground
3 Reportable quantity of hazardous material
(CERCLA def.) or quantity of real concern
Default
1 Not of concern to regional office
Seriousness of Pollutant Threat
3 One of most serious in OEM region
2O Default
1 Not a serious threat
RANK SCORE:
Source Name,
Control Number: t0,f � ,�____
County: �1l12(�1[ QQ a
Ranker:
Date: '