The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160404 Ver 2_Edward Johnson_Field Notes 2019-05-15Mitigation Site Meeting Notes Date: May 15, 2019 Project Name: Edwards Johnson Prepared By: Erin Davis, NCDWR Type of Site: NCDMS Stream Site Meeting Type: Compliance Review Sponsor/Provider: Water Land Solutions USACE AID: SAW -2016-00883 County: Johnston *Denotes County w/ 30 -foot Buffer NCDWR ID: 20160404 HUC and Basin: Neuse - 03020201 Weather: Coordinates: ON °W Attendees: USACE - Todd Tugwell DMS - Melonie Allen, Lindsay Crocker, Jeremiah Dow WLS - Kayne Van Stell, Catherine Manner, Adam McIntyre Project Review Checklist - (provide additional detail in notes section on next page) General Site Issues/Concerns: ❑ Vegetation Composition or Density ❑ Inappropriate Credit Ratio Proposed ❑ Planted Stem Vigor (due to soil, browsing) ❑ JD Needed to Confirm Approach ❑ Invasive/Exotic Species ❑ Continuity/Fragmentation ❑ Beaver/Feral Hogs (management plan) ❑ Easement Issues (existing farm, CE, NRCS funding) ❑ Soil (manipulation, compaction, fertility) ❑ Easement Encroachments (livestock, clearing) ❑ Livestock Present/Evidence of Livestock Access ❑ Easement Marking/Signage ❑ Crossings or Utility Lines ❑ Insufficient Project Size ❑ BMPs or Alternate Approaches ❑ Adjacent Property Owner ❑ Fencing Issues or Fencing Needed ❑ T&E Species ❑ Ponds Within Project Area ❑ Section 106 (historic listing/tribal issues) Stream Issues/Concerns: ❑ Incised/Entrenched ❑ Insufficient Stream Drainage Area ❑ Headcuts Present/Forming ❑ Insufficient Hydrology (if raising channel bed) ❑ Stream Structures Failing/Piping ❑ Vegetation in Channel (stream vs wetland) D Excess Sediment/Aggradation ❑ Flow Obstructions (undersized pipes, fords) ❑ Cross -Sections Missing/Indicate Problems ❑ Substrate Concerns (embeddedness, particle size) ❑ Bank Instability/Failure ❑ Live Stakes Absent/Failing ❑ Bench Rills/Erosion (constructed bench or P2 valley) ❑ Evidence of Water Quality Issues ❑ Excess Sinuosity (lack of flow) ❑ In -stream Habitat Weak/Missing El Braided/Anabranch Channel ❑ Stream Buffer Width Inadequate Wetland Issues/Concerns: ❑ Evidence of Excessive Hydrology ❑ Missing Gauge Data (preconstruction or monitoring) ❑ Evidence of Insufficient Hydrology ❑ Gauge Location/Placement ❑ Hydric Soil Indicators/Soil Series ❑ Gauge Maintenance ❑ Surface Roughness or Bedding ❑ Drainage Ditches/Swales Present ❑ Channel Relocation/Riparian Connectivity ❑ Field Tiles/Subsurface Drainage ❑ Hydroperiod Length or Start/Stop Date ❑ Continued Ag Use Adjacent to Wetland Page 1 of 2 Date: May 15, 2019 Project Name: Edwards Johnson Notes, Sketch, Action Items, etc.: Encroachment - 2 rows planted, additional signage installed Minor scour along R2 & upper R3 R2 & R4 confluence - watch parallel streams (one higher in elevation) Low cover areas of trees/herbs in floodplain Upper R3 - numerous tadpoles and fish observed Mid R3 - hurricane sediment deposition, 50-100' length of significant aggradation, watch to make sure system flushes Lower R3 - changed to multi thread system at as -built, adjacent ditch filled, stream development - passive restoration? - braided stream or headwater valley or wetland; functional uplift? - system enhancement vs. restoration; wetland present pre -construction - intent/goal of mit plan design vs. "expected condition/natural process" changes post -construction R4 - flow gauge located in pool (single gauge site) Upper R4 - more enhancement than restoration in top 50-100'; may need supplemental seeding/planting Credit Release/Site Closeout Information (for monitoring or closeout reviews only) Stream Credits Wetland Credits Warm Cool Cold Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal Requested Approved* Result of Monitoring Report or Closeout Review Project Manager Signature Date *The updated credit ledger for the project, which includes this release, must be approved by the Project Manager. Page 2 of 2 Form Updated 03/20/2019