20040462 Ver 1_Complete File_20040325

WT '?:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
?.uC.LR_ 8 S William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O C) G Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 1, 2005
DWQ Project # 04-0462
Haywood County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
5005 0390 00013552 8220
David Probst
Haywood Vocational Opportunities
Post Office Box 3007
Hazelwood, NC 28738
Subject Property: Haywood Vocational Opportunities ?
Haywood County
Site Inspection
Dear Mr. Probst:
On October 4, 2005, Mr. Kevin Barnett of the Asheville Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) and Mr. David McHenry of the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission inspected the installed stabilization structures at the Haywood Vocational
Opportunities site. The DWQ has does not believe that the installed in-stream
structures meet the goal of focusing the thalweg of the stream and reducing the near
bank jstresses during normal flow as presented in the submitted application. As these
structures are not posing an immediate threat to, nor serving to protect the near stream
bank during normal flows, this office does not want any further in-stream work to occur.
-The DWQ feel that continual in-stream work at this location will have not long term
benefit to the stream, yet may result in future instabilities.
At this time, a 25 foot woody buffer from top of flood prone area for the entire stream
length within this property (culvert to culvert), which complies with the Guidelines for
Riparian Buffer Restoration, should be planted to provides stream shading, additional
bank ';stability, and out of bank energy dissipation.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncvvetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally
Haywood Vocational Opportunities
Page 2 of 2
November 1, 2005
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Kevin
Barnett of my staff at 828-296-4657.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards, Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
RCE/khb
_Dann_y Smith, Wetlands-Stor_mwater Branch.
USACE Asheville Regulatory Fiel Od ffice - _ ~- --- -- -
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 04-0462. HaywoodVocational. Inspection
OF vvH/F
0t RpG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 8, 2005
DWQ Project # 04-0462
David Probst Haywood County
Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
Post Office Box 7
Hazelwood, NC 28738
Subject Property: Browning Branch Restoration U@@Rfly@
Haywood Vocational O ortuniti D
pp es, Inc. SEP 2 0-2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional oMA I+ BUCH
Dear Mr. Probst:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 640 linear feet of streams for the purpose
of streambank stabilization at the subject properties, as described within your
application received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on August 29, 2005.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3495 (GC3495). The Certification(s)
allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 13 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other
required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but ',not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and stormwater
regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to
conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose that you described in your application. If you change
your project beyond that authorized below, you must notify us and you may be required
'to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a
copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
,with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc. us/ncwetlands
NoithCarolina
,Naturalty
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Haywood Vocation Opportunities, Inc.
Page 2 of 7
September 8, 2005
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:

- Amount
-Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
Stream 640 feet Browning Branch
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
Haywood Vocation Opportunities, Inc.
Page 3 of 7
September 8, 2005
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Construction in this creek and disturbance within a 25-foot trout buffer should be
avoided during the October 15 to April 15 trout spawning period to avoid adverse
effects of sediment on eggs and larvae.
7. Sediment and erosion control measures must be implemented prior to construction
and maintained on the sites to minimize sediment in downstream areas. Seeding for
a temporary cover of wheat, millet, or similar annual grain or permanent herbaceous
cover should occur on all bare soil within five (5) days of ground disturbing activities
to provide long-term erosion control. The projects should be accomplished in stages
instead of leaving large tracts exposed to further storm events. Erosion control
matting should be used in conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in
steep slope and riparian areas. Matting should be secured in place with staples,
stakes, or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. Straw mulch and tall
fescue should not be used in riparian areas. In addition, because of an anticipated
difficulty in establishing ground cover during the winter, reseeding should be
conducted, as necessary, in the spring-time with a native annual and perennial seed
mix with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain.
8. Any structures (berms, levees, etc...) preventing stream access to its floodplain shall
be removed.
9. Only clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, or other natural stream design
materials and techniques should be used for bank stabilization. Rock should not be
placed in the stream channel in a manner that constricts stream flow or that will
impede aquatic life movements during low flow conditions. Filter cloth should be
placed behind large rock that is used for bank stabilization. Properly designed rock
vanes should be constructed wherever appropriate on bank stabilization and
channel realignment stream reaches to improve channel stability and to improve
aquatic habitat. Root wads should be installed low enough in the bank so that a
significant portion (at least one-third) the root wad is inundated during normal flows.
Haywood Vocation Opportunities, Inc.
Page 4 of 7
September 8, 2005
10. The channel should be restored to a more stable condition. However, under no
circumstances should river rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the stream
channel under authorization of this permit except, if necessary, in the immediate
vicinity of the eroding banks for the explicit purpose of anchoring stabilizing or
flow/grade control structures or for reestablishing the natural and more stable stream
channel dimensions. Stream bed materials are unstable in flowing-water situations
and are unsuitable for bank stabilization. In* stream dredging has catastrophic effects
on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the stream channel can cause
downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the
stream upstream and downstream of the permitted area should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or changing its depth.
11. Stabilization measures should only be applied on or near existing erosion sites,
leaving other stable stream bank areas in a natural condition. Grading and
backfilling should be minimized and tree and shrub growth should be retained where
possible to ensure long term availability of stream bank cover for aquatic life and
wildlife. Backfill materials should be obtained from upland sites except in cases
where excess stream bed materials are available. Berms should not be permitted
because they block the floodplain, constrict and accelerate flood flows, and often fail
and sometimes impede drainage during large flood events.
12. Repairs to eroded banks should be conducted in a dry work area where possible.
Sandbags or other clean diversion structures should be used where possible to
minimize excavation in flowing water. Channel realignments should be constructed
by excavating the new channel from downstream to upstream before connecting it to
the old channel.
13. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank whenever possible. All
mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. Equipment used in stream
channel must be clean, new or low hour equipment.
14. Disturbed stream banks and a 25-foot vegetated zone must be restored along the
entire stream segment in question to natural riparian conditions with native trees and
shrubs (e.g., silky dogwood, rhododendron, dog hobble, red maple, silky willow, tag
alder, black willow, sycamore) to provide long-term bank stability and stream
shading. Note, silky dogwood, silky willow and black willow can be planted as live
stakes collected during the dormant growing season. Cuttings should be randomly
planted on four (4) foot centers from the waters edge to the top of the bank. Trees
should be planted on ten (10) to twelve (12) foot centers. Stream banks in these
areas should also be seeded with a native annual and perennial seed mix with a
temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain. All plantings must be
completed within 15 days of completion of stream work and must extend from the
Scales Street Bridge to the HVO double barrel culvert stream crossing, must be
planted 25 foot deep measured form the top of stream bank back, and must comply
with the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. This buffer is required along
both stream banks with the exception of the Concrete Block Stack Wall adjacent to
the older of the two buildings. In this area, back filling with topsoil and planting of a
dense shrub layer is sufficient.
Haywood Vocation Opportunities, Inc.
Page 5 of 7
September 8, 2005
15. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected riparian zones
such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream. If this is not
possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered
to remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office.
16. Deed Restrictions
Deed restrictions or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained
jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective woody riparian zones in order to
assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These
mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization
Certificate.
18. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Continously recording,
calibrated turbiditimeters must be installed above and below the restoration area
and at any time the above turbidity limit is exceeded, all work must cease on the
property and all sediment and erosion control practices be reviewed, maintained,
or improved. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices must be utilized
to meet this standard. All violations must be reported within 30 minutes
17. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project.
18. Scheduling
• All stream work must be fininshed within 30 days of issuance of 404 and
401.
• All stormwater controls must be completed within 45 days of issuance.
• All plantings must be completed within 60 days of issuance.
19. Monitoring
That within 90 days of the signature date of this Certification, Haywood Vocation
Opportunities, Inc. must provide two (2) copies of a 5 year stream, riparian zone,
and Benthic monitoring plan to DWQ to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, Ashville Regional Office and North Carolina Division of Water Central
Office at 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. Said plan must
detail the monitoring requirement, which will begin upon the full implementation
Haywood Vocation Opportunities, Inc.
Page 6 of 7
September 8, 2005
of the stream and riparian zone buffer restoration. The physical monitoring plan
must include quarterly (January, April, July, October) inspections/review of the
restored stream and the riparian areas. The benthic monitoring plan must be
conducted annually, for a period of 5 years.
Repairs and/or corrections to restoration
days of the inspection observation of
situations:
efforts must be accomplished within 30
notification by DWQ in the following
i. if the stream banks become unstable;
ii. if measures constructed as a part of the stream restoration
efforts have failed or are failing; and/or
iii. if riparian restoration efforts, including plantings, are failing or
are not surviving.
An annual written report must be provided to the Asheville Regional Office and
Central Office of the DWQ by June 1 of each year. The report must describe
each quarterly inspection result and it must include the date of the inspection,
and describe when repairs or corrections were completed. Additionally, it must
also include the benthic monitoring results, for each stream segment restored.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
Haywood Vocation Opportunities, Inc.
Page 7 of 7
September 8, 2005
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Mr. Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at 828-296-4657.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AW Klkhb
Enclosures: GC 3495
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: Mickey Henson, Appalacian Envirommnetal Services
367 Scotts Creek Road
Sylva, NC 28779
Mr. Ronald C. Leatherwood, Clark and Leatherwood
179 Industrial Park Road
Waynesville, NC 28786
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
David McHenry - NC Wildlife Resources Commission
DWQ 401 Unit - Central Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 04-0462.HaywoodVocationalOpportunities.Approval
Triage Check List
Date: 09/01/05 Project Name: Haywood Vocational Opps
DWQ #:04-0462
County: Haywood
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 8/29/05 to 10/27/05 .
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
Stream length impacted
Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
Ditching
Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer';' as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
. yul Z)
Office Use Only: 2 0 4 OF r Version April 2001
0 4 6 2
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank. t _ r
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
D
®Section 404 Permit AUG 2 9 2005
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification DENR - WATER QUALITY
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules wETLMANDSTORMwATERBRANCH
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO) Inc. (David Probst)
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 7, Hazelwood, NC 28738
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, RF
Company Affiliation: Appalachian Environmental Services
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 52, Webster, NC 28788
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mickey.henson(Qappalachianenvironment.com
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
Name of project: Browning Branch Restoration of Stream Impacts
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 8605-81-0728
4. Location
County: Haywood Nearest Town: Hazelwood
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Please see attached MapOuest
directions.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N351 28.492' W 83° 0.229' (WGS84)
j (Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
j coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Haywood Vocational Opportunities is a private, not-for-profit corporation providing
vocational training and employment to adults with disadvantages and disabilities
7. Property size (acres): Approximately 5.11 Acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Browning Branch
9. River Basin: French Broad
Page 2 of 9
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To remove displaced river rock used as toe
protection, reinstall and/or remove in-stream rock structures, revegetate buffer areas along
the project reach, and convey storm water to Browning Brown at non-erosive velocities via
level spreader.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: This project will require the
use of an excavator sufficient in size to move existing in-stream rock structures Loader
Dump Truck. Equipment will be kept out of the stream and all disturbed areas will be
revegetated upon completion of work.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Haywood Vocational Opportunities is a
Training Facility for adults with disadvantages and disabilities. The surrounding land use is
mixed commercial and residential.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
401/404 certifications were requested in June 2005 for the removal of invasive species stream
bank stabilization and in-stream rock structure installation.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Page 3 of 9
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.Qov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwaterlsaltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
Plan Stabilization 640 Browning Branch 301f Perennial

Page 4 of 9
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 640 if
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation,
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The purpose of this project is to enhance and improve the environment Equipment will be
kept out of the stream channel. Whenever possible stream material will be moved from dry areas
? wetlands
installation of
Page 5 of 9
to the banks this will minimize the movement of wet stream material. All material to be
removed that is small enough for a capable person to lift will be removed by hand to minimize
impacts to the buffer areas by equipment. Temporary and/or herbaceous vegetation shall be
planted on all bare soil within 15 working dam ground disturbing activities. Angular stone of
sufficient size will be brought in to stabilize to toe of impacted stream banks where necessary
VIII. j Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
,USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlaiids/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 6 of 9
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htip:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/wr2/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 7 of 9
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Gone t extends out su teet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Imperviousness of the site will not change. Existing building of Haywood Vocational
Opportunities is approximately 1.7 acres of impervious rooftop. Storm water draining from the
roof will be diverted from gutter drains, to ground surface to be treated by a level spreader before
entering the buffer area of browning branch. This will allow the storm water to be treated as it
flows through the buffer area at a velocity very near to zero. Currently storm water is directly
discharged into Browning Branch from the roof of HVO.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 8 of 9
Restroom facilities of Haywood Vocational Opportunities will be used by work crews.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Mickey B. Henson (Agent) 08/19/2005
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Project Name:
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTS
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
Project Owner:
Haywood Vocational Opportunities
Post Office Box 7
Hazelwood, NC 28738
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
CONTACT: David Probst
Designer: ---=
Q
D
AUG 2 9 2005
APPALACHIAN ti,°DSA;,?sro?°?Er;cs
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
367 SCOTTS CREEK RD
SYLVA, NC 28779
828.586.1973
828.631.0343 (fax)
www.appalachianenvironment.com
CONTACT: Mickey B. Henson
Plan Sheet Index
1 - EXISTING SITE
2 - PROPOSED STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
3 - CROSS SECTIONS
4 - DETAILS
975 rp:
•n M,
SUL
Ina
race n..v - . hryp?, w'"b?5 ? 5.
....... ' tr ; n
C--"A, R
R E Ileac Sty HaeAvood Ave

C
'
[
t ma s s
j: i.
Yae? P =a
41 ' E
R
fo_hRd
e U
te

' 4'
pl" ? H=AV0.d y^'
Qu
j}Wr?
c F
e¢
h ?
`p{
Gn
.^sti'.. [ M k'tM5 m re
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Project Description:
Haywood Vocational Opportunities has a perennial stream running through their property. Due to damage resulting
from Hurricanes Francis and Ivan in September 2004 and an infestation of invasive species on the site.
Streambanks were stabalized and in-stream rock structures placed to protect these banks from further damage. In
addition, invasive species were removed. Coir matting was installed on streambanks and the entire reach of stream
was seeded with native grasses including creeping red fescue and brown top millet. The site was scheduled to be
planted with native woody vegetation in the fall.
During post construction inspection, certain aspects of the project were found out of compliance with the scope of
work. This plan outlines the measures to be taken to remedy the problems encountered during the post construction
inspection, including the reinstallation and/or removal of in stream structures, vegetation of buffer areas, and
stormwater conveyance measures.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. RECEIVE AUTHORIZATION OF APPLICATION, CONTACT PERMITTING AGENCIES 48 HOURS
IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUTION. UPON APPROVAL, CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMMENCE IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER.
2. REMOVE ALL RIVER ROCK PLACED ON TOE OF BANK AND REMOVE OFFSITE. THIS WILL BE
DONE BY HAND SO AS NOT TO DISTURB THE STREAMBANK ANY MORE THAN POSSIBLE.
3. ALL COIR MATTING SHALL BE ANCHORED AS SHOWN ON PLANS USING MINIMUM 12" WOODEN
STAKES. IN AREAS SUCH AS OUTSIDE BENDS, RIP RAP OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO WITHSTAND
SHEAR STRESSES SHALL BE PLACED ON THE TOE TO ANCHOR THE MATTING TO THE
BANK/WATER INTERFACE.
4. ROCK VANES WILL BE REMOVED AND REINSTALLED AS SHOWN ON PLANS USING MINIMUM 24"
BOULDERS. BOULDERS SHOULD TOUCH EACH OTHER WITH NO GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS.
HEADER ROCKS SHOULD BE OFFSET UPSTREAM FROM FOOTER ROCKS TO PREVENT SCOUR
BELOW FOOTER ROCKS.
5.OVERSEED DISTURBED AREA WEEKLY AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A DENSE GROWTH OF
VEGETATION.
6. STORMWATER FROM EXISTING HVO BUILDING SHALL BE DIRECTED INTO A LEVEL SPREADER
BEFORE ENTERING BUFFER ZONE AND STREAM.
7. BACKFILL GROUNDHOG HOLES BEHIND CONCRETE WALL. FILL WILL BE USED FROM SOIL
EXCAVATED FOR LEVEL SPREADER.
8. PLANT WOODY VEGETATION ALONG PROJECT REACH IN THE FALL AT RATE OF 436 STEMS PER
ACRE.
fy?' 1 m
x?: rjr° 1
IO \ \ \' t
\ _ - I}i li \ Vµ va
1 --
?Se oir Matted an wed I
Seeded Coir M ed ? Inv v i ecies Removed C
and Strawed ? -Cone a ved From Stma i• ??
TO
t
Invasive Species Rem ved NE E
(TO NEW BRIDGE)
i t I
' i
? i
-Streambank Reshape -Str mbank Re 4
Seeded, Coir Matted d S ~., ed -See d, Coir Matte a t ed
i
CONCRETE RETAINING W LL
L• i?
-Seede , Coir to and Str
1
I
l} as i 2 J.
Seeded, Coir Matted and. Straw
';i ??Stream Re ha ;
-Invasive Species Removed ii ped \
{ ?S ed, oir ed a wed
Py v
I ?
I
iI
?t I
EXISTING 41AYW0oD VOC00NAI. OPPORTUNITIES BUILDING }
ti "?eeded, Coir Matted ' nd Strawed
. s
jl -Siryeambank Resha i d
-Streambank Reshaped. eeded, Coir Matte ii nd Strawed
-Seeded, Coir Matted and Strawed ` aced on Toe Bank
1+,
-Seeded i' oir Matted and Strawed
sDEWALK \ ock Plaon Toe of Bank
% 1 "Seede Coir Matted and Strawed
-Rock P I ced on Toe of Bank
T

N
W E
S
60 30 0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 60 FEET
LEGEND
EXISTING STREAM
SILT FENCE
ROCK VEIN
31
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
_ _ EXISTING f? g5?D
eal l ??
RS: € SITE RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTS z
El RZ1
b HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC ...?g
A. 0' 1 1 I .
21kw 1
}
3 •I,cap 1 fi 4,``
RS 1 ? rp- + ? + 1
\ 14
-Na e' ecies Planted-
Native Spe •es anted (TO ;iIDGE)
(TO NEW BRIL GE)
i
\ t.
Rock Van Reinstalle
Speci ations in ret 4
-NatiS Species Pla
VV
CONCRETE RETAINING W LL
-Backfill Concrete Wall
o Native Species Planted' c
-15' Toe Protection
Upstream of Wall...
ti
-Native Species Planted
Storm Outlets Directed 1 r,
From Gutters to Level
Spreader
Level Spreader Installed
To Diffuse Flow of Storm
Water Through Buffer
OPPORTUNITIES BUILDING
EXISTING NAYWOOD VOCAnoNAL \
I
Native Species Pla
Rock Vane 1 Reins
Native ecie anted
?• s V71S
?• 3
ock Va e93 R oved t !
To rot o d
?R c a Reins
Sp ??jci icatio in sheet
1 _Ni?ti a Sped ante
i
t?
ti It
1i -N20ve Species Planted i
I. I }1
t le
1
I
I
1
b
I
II?
l?
I
i I
to Specifications in S . et I1t, \•? is
-lock Placed o oe Removed
- ative Species c, anted
C /\ ?+ S1DEWAIfC
Rock Placed on Toe Re ve
1 d
(FROM EXISTING BRI E) Native Species Planted
(FROM EXISTING BRIDGE)
i
/
LEGEND
N
W E
S
60 30 0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 60 FEET
EXISTING STREAM
• SILT FENCE
ROCK VANE
RIP RAP TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED HAYOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES 4- + ' ¢ 1- .
Q pc, .; Irk 4?'?
'1 t^ L-? ?CDi
N I ?. SITE RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTS SITE $ b? HAYWOOD COUNTY. NC
tp p� DEPTH (IN)
f N
O O O O O O O
X_
O
-p
-�
O
Z
0
0
cn
=4
0
HAYi'fi 00D VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
o z
CJI
SECTIONS
RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTSP,
�r�rr'77'
I
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
a0
w
I
i
i.d
Q
y
a
W
5
2
N
O
1
i
I
w
�
I
w
7
1
i
I
1
-0
X_
O
-p
-�
O
Z
U)
0
cn
=4
CROSS
HAYi'fi 00D VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
o z
CJI
=4
CROSS
HAYi'fi 00D VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
o z
CJI
SECTIONS
RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTSP,
�r�rr'77'
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC

IVA •?. ?'
h
. STORAMUTER CONVEYANCE MEASURES
drain ban the VI building of HrfmW Vantknl CpPalnkles Ma B-nkv Bmrh
Sameatr cmnd APPALACHIAN
©
ey
0 y
vim ellRads In adr b envs lhd do nwebr nWt the a drwey r that Boe s oval tndr ydmwd be ENVIRONMENTAL SEPnCES
•
yr
n
r
kwMlad to amy wolf to the araam ExMN ptla JJn on The ad side dSr blYIJnB W badadagh 1.
" r
xc e
inr
shoVWa dangllerreagdthsbikWg. Baklaa Wl be In"Ied to sl x barbdty Wee dwravrra t Fh , r waauxn
u
A
u
Irma lho gutter Jahn noso-der will Bln Noe acme a paved Visa bakes It ard- the level spreader. a •. 5 a
wHomm•
w..A
mi
The lawl sprdrWAS wave 1I of d bar ban fdthe roofrr or b. ",g building wll Mrtlr Mk arm of ..,
BM Waaam elm era vabdry as that lox. The as str eB have a chains to be Stated as t Soon ftaughM
O
buflr area helm I rrrhr the Warm
A
T
)??: xr6 0
f? '(t',.,
''cc Y? © Edathb mNwawill not be r d as they m locad in and a gt rods detabishd wood) vegdkan and
the"-al alri. euNra sIsa mquireNe removal dwaodyvegadln.
S
cf VOL/to .

LrT
A
N
DF
SHIR
AX
POPWARD LEVEL SPREADER
1.INSERTBA
AS SHOW
, AN
U
M
E
1 REMOVE iHF 845. AND PLACE LACE SE SEEDRI0]FdDCr CEPM
S INSERT BAR k TO R INCHES FROM SEEOUNG(TOWARD YOU). AND RALMICUTO CIAg BOTIOMOF HOLE
a. PUSH HANDLE FORWARD TO CLOSE T[F OF HOLE
a. REMOVE BAR. AND CAREFULLY CLOSE THE OPENING WITH YCLAKELTOAVOIDNXWGTIE3IDdIG,
a
a.9 S TECHNIQUE WHLL NOT BE USED FOR CCNTANUZZFDTPES'
T. DEPTH OF HOLE MUST BE DEEP ENOUGH TO ACOJM:GAGTE ENTIRE TAPROOT.
e AVOO ROOTPAWrq
lR
n
aAem
I N7TES

1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, NCUlCNG/NY NECESSARY
LAvOLO
N
O.
00 APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER AND SEED. USE TURF REINFORCEMENT MATM4 C7
w ICC%COIR MATTING OR EOJNA JE NT.
( \
i PLAN VEW Z BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORING THE BLANKETNATCEP
X B' WIDE TRENCH WTH APPROXIMATELY 170E BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND
THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WTHAROW
OF STAPLESlSTAKES APPROXIMATELY 50'APARTN THE BOTTOM OF THE

©
LEVEL SPREADER:

o••a C•.fa poq, I•FhMOoy tam
Otlq

Aa (i or Ou1dvo
A AFTER STA04M APPLY SEED
TTRENCH. O BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE
FOLD REMAINING Ir PORTION OF BLANKET BALK

T SOIL
COMPACTED BOIL.SECURE BLANKET OVER APA
AND
SEED
'

3

W
.
•a.ll rh
0
17
t!K? R
O
F
WITH
APMT ACROSS
WITH A ROW OF STAPLESTAPlESR1AKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY W B) VJ
+Yt ? i
i . THE MOTH OF THE BLANKET. I..1
L,

l Alcrbw vercay M mms)'1 Bar
Abvrwvabdy (Jabw7werlmlapnaer•
1.55Idee & FULL LENGTH EDGE OF BLANKETS AT TOP OF SIDE SLOPES MLST REANOIORED
WITH A ROW OF STAPLES:STAKES APPROXIMATELYWAPART NAS DEEP XS
WDE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAKM
ky••I V
F-I SA

Q ^
wow halgwld/rwrrva awrder•Abeh PROFILEVIEYV
Lryh • GTV~Q •1.7WA3%45Q • 6025

4. ADJACENT BLANKETS MUST BE OVERLAPPED APPROXIMATELY SAND STAPLED. N
Aa
W
a level spreaderlkwd wkh gedexble and TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PUCE THE EDGEOFTHiEOVERIIPPNG
N TH
BLANKET SUNG
C"
a,.a
z
•, award WN 857 gavel. E
BLANKET (BLANKET BENG INSTALLED ON TOP) O
OVERLAPPED /y
= 1••I
I•EA15R
K • o! 1 .
L THE TERMINAL END OF THE BLANKETS MUST BEM404ORED YJIH A RONOF
1. SMNGHOEDAO FROM OVERHEAD DOVMWARD. SWING THE BLALEITSFULL L047HVERTICALLY NTOSUL r•12 STAPLESfSTAKES APPROXIMATELY Sa' APART IN Ar DEEP XSWDETR24CK ^ ?1
fi
"
W
IM,NMUM DEPTH OF SLOTG I NDE37
7.P
kd1 THE MJDE UPWARD SUGH%Y BY LIFTING THE DO OF HANDLE d-02M LACKFI LL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING_
,
^
7. SHTHE HANDLE DOVMWMD WHILE PU1NGBOCK TO OPEN HOLE
FU
O
a WITH THE BLADE IN CAVITY TO HOLD BACK LOOSE SOIL CAREFULLY RACE SEEDLING NHOLE WKPG APE ROOTS
ARE FULY EXTENCING. THEN FE)AOV ETHE FACE
Gear a
S CLOSE THE HOLE By INSERTING HrOEDAO BESIDE THE SEEDUNG, THEN UFTI GLF AND PLO" DOWN ON THE Mar
. THEN a
PANME TO EPLANTING SLOTLIS CL04DCCMAETLY G

I

"-
T. A MINIMUM OF FOUR HI SPECIES OF WE ROOT TREE SEEDLINGS AVLLEE SELECI®ANDNSrAlID.
SEE *APPROVED WE ROOT SPECIES UST DLO" FOR ALTETCNTI\£$ U
S -THIS TECHNIQUE WILL NOT BE USED FOR CONTANET ZEDTIREES' I

Guise Or O

0
tte Don
> G ROCK VANE (CONCEPTUAL DESIGN)
v
l o
N o
nnx ir
O
V
CAOSS SON O
APPROVED BARE ROOT SEEDLING SPECIES
I
Planting Palette(Based Upon Availability) tHaRa
I Lwd
S "m 2"
°^
O
Redbud (Cereiscanadensis) ?A ON
1-1 ea GRADE
SHE DMwE
POINTO, Q
0 [-
Doghobble (teucothoe axillaris)
APAG W
Button Bush (Cephalanthus ocddentalis)
• V2 (ROW DIRECTION
/1A
k+t

Silky Dogwood(Comus amomum) 0
A?

} TH
?
NOTE: BOUNDERS
;.? 44`. . j ) 90d PLAN VIEW SHOULD BE
lniana) Q
Witch-Hotel (Namamelis vir 24' MIN
g
i% 975
' Ub
Winierberry(Ilex verddllata) p
,
Yellow-Root (Xanthorhiza simplidssima) (n
E

' Overstory species will not be removed.
" Z z
q REA BA'x
ST
PLANTING PLAN
??"?? ?I
5? TIE INTO TOP OF BANK,
rosrvM"E IEGTM
7
s
R
BLY
.
PREFE
A
FIELD WRZIY: N/A
ALL STABALVED BANKS WILL BE SEEDED WITH AN EROSION CONTROL GRADE ` CRUM IM N/A
PLANTING MIX AT A RATE OF 80b Nacre. AREAS OUTSIDE OF STREAMBANKS WILL BE NOTE: BOULDERS INITIAL &M 2/27/03
SEEDED AT A RATE OF 80b/acre AND MULCHED WITH CLEAN STRAW AT A RATE OF 2 \ SHOULD BE
S1FFA'"8C, 24' MIN ttnMrs Due 8/12/05
FA7FI[ttt L/ AEON
TONSIACRE BARE ROOT TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES WILL BE PLANTED IN THE FALL / REVISIONS
AT A RATE OF 436 STEMSIACRE THROUGHOUT THE RIPARIAN TONE FROM EXISTING sou WE n
CULVERT AT SCATES STREET TO NEW CULVERT 640 FEET DOWNSTREAM. \ INSTALL CLASS I RIPRw FOOTER DEPTHS BELOW
Ir MAY THeO LESS SUBSTRATE
H
17 should artnd to bank I
SHOULD M OFrSET LRSTPEAR OF THE
elevation m strerrtnk NOTE: THE HEADER ROCK
LY
E
R
above baselowtop at water YTOA p1t10 SAPS.
I?U4LL
FAIILURE ROCKS SHOULD O: U BE FITTED
elevation. e45[AQV
w"TaLU+n
-
SHEET
4

01 74
1 i
Office,Use Only: """ \ Form Version April 2001
20040462
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
L Processing A n%%
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ° uG 2 g I*s
F
? Section 10 Permit P QU?y?Tt
® 401 Water Quality Certification WP?ER P
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules oEOSo
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO) Inc. (David Probst)
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 7, Hazelwood, NC 28738
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mickey B._Henson, Ph.D., PWS. RF
Company Affiliation: Appalachian Environmental Services
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 52, Webster, NC 28788
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:[phone]
E-mail Address: mickey.henson(a,appalachianenvironment com
Page 1 of 9
f•
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
,impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Browning Branch Restoration of Stream Impacts
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 8605-81-0728
4. Location
County: Haywood Nearest Town: Hazelwood
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Please see attached MapQuest
directions.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N35° 28.492' W 83° 0.229' (WGS84)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Haywood Vocational Opportunities is a private not-for-profit corporation providing
vocational training and employment to adults with disadvantages and disabilities
Property size (acres): Approximately 5.11 Acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Browning Branch
9. River Basin: French Broad
I
Page 2 of 9
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at ham://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To remove displaced river rock used as toe
protection, reinstall and/or remove in-stream rock structures, revegetate buffer areas along
the project reach, and convey storm water to Browning Brown at non-erosive velocities via
level spreader.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: This project will require the
use of an excavator sufficient in size to move existing in-stream rock structures, Loader
Dump Truck. Equipment will be kept out of the stream and all disturbed areas will be
revegetated upon completion of work.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Haywood Vocational Opportunities is a
Training Facility for adults with disadvantages and disabilities. The surrounding land use is
mixed commercial and residential.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
401/404 certifications were requested in June 2005 for the removal of invasive species stream
bank stabilization and in-stream rock structure installation.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
Page 3 of 9
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* ! List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
Plan Stabilization 640 Browning Branch 301f Perennial

Page 4 of 9
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditch ing/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.ma guest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 6401f
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody

applicable)
(if Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The purpose of this project is to enhance and improve the environment Equipment will be
kept out of the stream channel. Whenever possible stream material will be moved from dry areas
Page 5 of 9
to the banks. this will minimize the movement of wet stream material. All material to be
removed that is small enough for a capable person to lift will be removed by hand to minimize
impacts to the buffer areas by equipment. Temporary and/or herbaceous vegetation shall be
planted on all bare soil within 15 working days of ground disturbing activities. Angular stone of
sufficient size will be brought in to stabilize to toe of impacted stream banks where necessar.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.btml.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 6 of 9
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/M/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Page 7 of 9
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Imperviousness of the site will not change. Existing building of Havwood Vocational
Opportunities is approximately 1.7 acres of impervious rooftop Storm water draining from the
roof will be diverted from gutter drains, to ground surface to be treated by a level spreader before
entering the buffer area of browning branch. This will allow the storm water to be treated as it
flows through the buffer area at a velocity near to zero. Currently storm water is directly
discharged into Browning Branch from the roof of HVO.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 8 of 9
Restroom facilities of Haywood Vocational Opportunities will be used by work crews.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
jj
Mickey B. Henson (Agent) 08/19/2005
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's' signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Project Name:
RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTS
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
Project Owner:
Haywood Vocational Opportunities
Post Office Box 7
Hazelwood, NC 28738
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
CONTACT: David Probst
Designer:

APPALACHIAN
#?@&#
AUG 2 9 2005 L;.
?. BEN KA
?4??M'?j?tr?&tT?i4CQl R ry.
?rC}?
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
367 SCOTTS CREEK RD
SYLVA, NC 28779
828.586.1973
828.631.0343 (fax)
www.appalachianenvironment.com
CONTACT: Mickey B. Henson
Plan Sheet Index
1- EXISTING SITE
2 - PROPOSED STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
3 - CROSS SECTIONS
4 - DETAILS
975 02;
•FYe.N.
;Y OW
Ina

j? Cmpty Ah 1@ ? N
lmb L.;;
SEIlunSt Hu-W EAra
z a
?
4 g,? y R°M +rAH
0
4

a
3
_ , rd.wnRa
'iRa +?
Gay
y
r ?
?. µ°P+
'ti.. ca `?.y q Hudvood N'
E

VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Project Description:
Haywood Vocational Opportunities has a perennial stream running through their property. Due to damage resulting
from Hurricanes Francis and Ivan in September 2004 and an infestation of invasive species on the site.
Streambanks were stabalized and in-stream rock structures placed to protect these banks from further damage. In
addition, invasive species were removed. Coir matting was installed on streambanks and the entire reach of stream
was seeded with native grasses including creeping red fescue and brown top millet. The site was scheduled to be
planted with native woody vegetation in the fall.
During post construction inspection, certain aspects of the project were found out of compliance with the scope of
work. This plan outlines the measures to be taken to remedy the problems encountered during the post construction
inspection, including the reinstallation and/or removal of in stream structures, vegetation of buffer areas, and
stormwater conveyance measures.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE;
1. RECEIVE AUTHORIZATION OF APPLICATION, CONTACT PERMITTING AGENCIES 48 HOURS
IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUTION. UPON APPROVAL, CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMMENCE IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER.
2. REMOVE ALL RIVER ROCK PLACED ON TOE OF BANK AND REMOVE OFFSITE. THIS WILL BE
DONE BY HAND SO AS NOT TO DISTURB THE STREAMBANK ANY MORE THAN POSSIBLE.
3. ALL COIR MATTING SHALL BE ANCHORED AS SHOWN ON PLANS USING MINIMUM 12" WOODEN
STAKES. IN AREAS SUCH AS OUTSIDE BENDS, RIP RAP OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO WITHSTAND
SHEAR STRESSES SHALL BE PLACED ON THE TOE TO ANCHOR THE MATTING TO THE
BANKIWATER INTERFACE.
4. ROCK VANES WILL BE REMOVED AND REINSTALLED AS SHOWN ON PLANS USING MINIMUM 24"
BOULDERS. BOULDERS SHOULD TOUCH EACH OTHER WITH NO GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS.
HEADER ROCKS SHOULD BE OFFSET UPSTREAM FROM FOOTER ROCKS TO PREVENT SCOUR
BELOW FOOTER ROCKS.
5.OVERSEED DISTURBED AREA WEEKLY AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A DENSE GROWTH OF
VEGETATION.
6. STORMWATER FROM EXISTING HVO BUILDING SHALL BE DIRECTED INTO A LEVEL SPREADER
BEFORE ENTERING BUFFER ZONE AND STREAM.
7. BACKFILL GROUNDHOG HOLES BEHIND CONCRETE WALL. FILL WILL BE USED FROM SOIL
EXCAVATED FOR LEVEL SPREADER.
8. PLANT WOODY VEGETATION ALONG PROJECT REACH IN THE FALL AT RATE OF 436 STEMS PER
ACRE.
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
2A kD" '\
31,?5G
1 _-
Seeded, Coir Ma ed
and Strawed
Invasive Species Rem ved
(TO NEW BRIDGE)
-Streambank Reshape
Seeded, Coir Matted d
CONCRETE RETAINING W LL'

,\-Se oir Matted aSTawed
Inv v } ecies Removed
?Conclr e ved From S=am_-
-StrWmbank RE
-See d, Coir M
1- • ¦
Seeded, Coir Matted and Straw t
Invasive Species Removed
t
t
t
vMAnoNAL OPPORTUN111ES BUILDING t
EXISTING HAYW000 '1}
it
i
-Streambank Reshaped
Seeded, Coir Matted and Strawed
I

1
t
}
t I
j
S II
s I
a
Ij
,j
1i
d \
a wed
-?eeded, Coir Matted 'ndlStrawed
t
y S
?Stryeambank Resha d
eeded, Coir Matte nd Strawed
\ N "1c't'Jaced on Toe Bank
\ Seeded ' oir Matted and Strawed
} 510EWNJ< N ock Pla ` on Toe of Bank
s} ,1}s
-Seede Coir Matted and Strawed
Rock P ced on Toe of Bank

LEGEND
N
W E
s
60 30 0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 60 FEET
EXISTING STREAM
SILT FENCE
ROCK VEIN
P HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
_ EXISTING
SITE RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTS
b? HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
ie Irtnd

-, 1?1 I I % ? , ? '? 11111
%.0, .
3? k50 \ ??sti. ?
-Na ' e I ecies Planted
I
Native Spe 'es anted ? (TO IDGE .
(TO NEW BRIL GE)
i I
• i ?
z }j i
t i
Rock Van Reinstalle ' 11
Speci ations in eet 4 t?
-NatiJ Species Pla
I
CONCRETE RETAINING W LL 1?
-Backfill Concrete Wall Native ecie anted 1
Native Species Planted c is f
-15' Toe Protection
Upstream of Wall, ?I ?• 3 j'
,- ` 11 \
4
ock Va e93 R oved •i'
t t
-- Native Species Planted i To rot o d
-- -Storm Outlets Directed i R¢c a Reins
From Gutters to Level Sp qci icatio in sheet
Spreader ?Ntti e Speci ante
Level Spreader Installed
To Diffuse Flow of Storm
Water Through Buffer
OPPORTU4111ES SUIIDING ` }l I
EXISTING HAYWOOAnONA- 1t -Nzttive Species Planted
-Native Species Plah _ }}
n -Rock Vane 1 Reinst It
to Specifications in S.
i
i
i
i
i
i
1 /
i
Dock Placed o
Native Saecie

Rock Placed on Toe
-Native GVP GR ".4 ?
(FROM EXISTING BR:
e Removed
Native Species Planted
(FROM EXISTING BRIDGE)

LEGEND
N
W E
S
60 30 0 30 60 90
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 60 FEET
EXISTING STREAM
SILT FENCE
ROCK VANE
RIP RAP TOE
PROTECTION
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
_ PROPOSED
N SITE RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTS
_ b 6 HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
DEPTH (IN)
m
X
X
0
u
0
z
cf)
G)
m
rr
cn
X
I
X
faco
O
Z
I A
--Al
7K
O
CDP
O
-u
m
X
X
0
u
0
z
cf)
G)
m
0
cn
X
I
X
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
CROSS
RESTORATION OF STREAM IMPACTS
21ts� SECTIONS I
§ HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
1-11114� I
Sri iFoil

LPA +y: w'
lam 0 F? 0 STORMWATER CONVEYANCE MEASURES
Stomrwawr -any ddr lnhe rhkng building of Haywoodvariaal CppabnUse Into Rrowrig 6ndl
wld RIAwLE In adwto euMe list donllwwarsnows BMwderway as shod bow a"apeedr rywamwB b

?
APPALACHIAN
ENVIRONMENTAL SENICEs
rr atom - ww
MaldtoFaxyrlndltoMd?wn. fidrWq pNrddnnhe rd Ids ddw buiOFpWbddroq ,'' snrA wE en»
abovega ddmphwwdwJdtlrbJ16i0. BehrwO be In"Iedto slow Mwvslody o71Wdamrdw rl
Bw ddnE The dnrexdw WE Men Bw auoss a paved area blon B wdantlW level spuds.
I__he F : t

-7 sn MUm
y
Mrand
gl a
n
r
erro
wis
b
TMlwd eprdw wR ensors IndJbwfvn ?Rr !

wsfto
to
char WE
how a chorce to .1
be e glared d
l Aova hsa
damxdw
as
tlM eormwih eroWdyu dlrtlw.Tha plllw
bur- wr before If-,hr the Gene n
EdNnp aMwq who edbrwnweduhrywbptd In ndasrlpd lads dedtllAdwmd/repdtlm wd
IM rarod or he aHw4 would also NR+Ins he nnwd of woos,' vagabdom
1 5

t t'+',

Jd}wµy?"'.

,'i, Ids
:
'
N :
?FY
N oARa NmN+
STMMS LEVELSPREADER .
}l i'; .3 {'S y 4
.
1. INSERT BAR AS SHOWN. AND PUSH HANDLE FORWARD
7. RFMORE TEBAR, A40 RACE SEENPG AT CORRECT CEPTM ,
I Ir?:?.,
S. INSERT BAR 5 TO 4 INCHES FROM SEEDLING (TOWARD YOU). RO RLI HNAE TO CLOSE BOTTOM OF MCIE
4. PUSH HANDLE FORWARD TO CLOSE TOP OF HEIE

4
5. REMOVE B.W, AND CAREFULLY CLOSE THE OPENING PATH YClPHEELTO AVDDNURINGTHESEANG.
a.'I/BS TECHNIQUE W U NOT BE USED FOR CCNTA"Y=TPMS• N0T6.
T.A?OID ROm .ioBE DEEP ENOUGH ioA'SL. M:UksiE@fIPETAPROOT I 1. PRE PARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKET$ NCWDNGANY NECESSARY
B. AVOID 4-ROOTIN05LE B ABOVE) APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER AND SEED. USE TURF RENFORCEMENT MATTING C?
w 100% COIR MATTING OR EOJNAIENT.

` l
VIEW
PUN 2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL BY ANCHORNG THE BLANKET NAB DEEP
X B'VADE TRENCH WITH APPROMMATELY 12" OF BLANKET FXIENCFD BEYOND
THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKETMATHARCW
OF STAPLESISTAKES APPROXIMATELY NT APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE

O © O

QLEVEL -QAsPREADEe
A : A a,f l•tlNr(10 yrdaw),
A • 1M sea (} of bublin MIMny
035*rA4 -4.79 rh t%y
APPLY SEED
TRENCH.
TO COMPACTED 1SOILNANDFOLD REMAIN 07PORTICNCF BLANKET BACK
OVER REED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE Bl1NKFT OVER COMPACTED SOIL
WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES SPACED APPROXRUTELY WAPART ACROSS

W
rA ?'4 A:t THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET.
SUOPEB MUST RE ANN 4ORED
D Lam,
E'A
igi Alo=W whRyIV) bma)4 L9r
Afo VeW.RY N4a+M-1-1 SPsdw•
I35BWr
I E
S FULL LENGTH EDGE OF BLANKETS AT TOP OF SI
WITH A ROW OF STAPLESISTAKES APPROXIMATELY WAPARTNAir DEEPXBv
MADE TRENCH. BAOOILLAND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAONO. 1•wl U
EW
wdwhopl(d) rx level Spwdx•A5Bh PROFILE V
Laph •CKV~d)•4.1W.331A58) A 6035
B hovel apaaderlined with Beds ble and
4. ADJACENT BLANKETS MUST BE OVERLAPPED APPROXIMATELY CANDSTAPLED.
TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM AIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVER APPBA ^
N? P.1
1?I
-
V
E
n?s,NrT^enn A•r^•n boveld with B57 gavel. BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP ON THE BLANKET BEING Q
? AC
h•1

N^'E? 1.60351
a • 0.5 B OVERLAPPED.
B THE TERMINAL END OF THE BLANKETS MUST BEANCHORED YOH AROYCF ^
Z
O
1. SWING HOELMD FROM OVERHEAD DOWNWARD, SIwaNG TEBI-ACE DSFULLUNGTHVfRMCALLYINTO SOIL
(MINIMUM DEPTH OF SLOT ISI INDIES) w•12
d • ODMB STAPLESWAXES APPROOMATELY SB APART IN Ar DEEP XrVADETRENCH.
BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRQN(NAFTER STAPLING.
7. PULL THE RACE UPWARD SLIGHTLY By LIFTING THE END OF HANDLE
S.PUSH THE HANEAE DOWNWARD WHILE PAUJW BACXTO OPEN HOLE
4. WITH THE BIACE IN CAVITY TO HOLD SAIX LOOSE SOIL CAREFULLY RACE SMXAIG N HOLE MAaG SUE ROOTS
THEN REMOWTHE9 ACE
ARE FULLY EXRIEANC
//?iyyy
1/7-1
Z
.
5. CLOSE THE HOLE BY INSERTING HOEDAD BESIDE THE SEDUNG.THENUFlNIGIPANDKKMNGDPNNONTE
bI
EDLING
P
TOWAO S
i G?aAr GICrr (
4
E
?
HANOLETOTIGHTENSO
L TNEH
191
L
.
E
e 8E SORE PANTING SLO7IS a03DCOASIE LY. l
V/
`W
7. A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) SPECIES OF BARE ROOT TREE SFITUWSSALSESE ECI®A"ONBIAIIED.
FOR kTE
ROVEDBARE ROOT SPECIES' LIST
S
z
ES'
I
HISTEC
4'MTECNeWEWHLL NOT BE E USED us©Fa2 aNTANEurNEramTAFES•
Gw
D
O
w
a 1•N A
O

G
On ROCK VANE (CONCEPIUPLDESIGN) EH
O

nx
warnuAo < Z

O
L)
D, )DN
APPROVED BARE ROOT SEEDLING SPECIES i E
M
Planting Polette(Based Upon Availability)
MOelo• ?A?N A
O
G
Redbud (Cercis canadensis) n
O? BE-OW ELEVAD
ROINr ff tP THE OWIEL
,•, E-
0
Doghobble (Leucothoe axiliar)s) ?
LZ r ,
hM
Button Bush (Cephalanthusocddentalis) nNAE (FLOWDIMCTICN a
G1R0 ` I M LENGTH
Silky Dogwood (Comus amomum)
t NOTE: BOULDERS
d
?
iniana) k1 `5
l(Hamamelisvir
Wit
h- H t PLAN VIEW SHOULD
90
24" MIN
.
g
c
aze
L':. 975
'
Viinterberry (flexvertidliata) ;
?'...
Yellow-Root (Xanthorhiza simplidssima) k,?:
, Cl)
A z
6 H
Overstory species will not be removed.
i VIHwGH
AREA OF W Q QI
I STPLAM BANK
PLANTING PLAN
N, TIE INTO TOP OF BANK,
15T05MVNE8GM PREFERABLY W
M IN P
ALL STABALIZED BANKS WILL BE SEEDEDWITH AN EROSION CONTROL GRADE ` DPAUW BY% WA
A
PLANTING MIX AT A RATE OF 601blaae. AREAS OUTSIDE OF STREAMBANKS WILL BE

SEEDED ATARATEOF80lblacreANDMULCHEDWITHCLEANSTRAWATARATEOF2
NOTE: BOULDERS
ems SHOULD BE
SMEAM 24• MIN
NDt11 DOM 2/27/03
TDCAYS DATE ?1
PATHINKAT L/-REC1
TONS/ACRE BARE ROOT TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES WILL BE PLANTED IN THE FALL I Lti saHs
AT A RATE OF 436 STEMS/ ACRE THROUGHOUT THE RIPARIAN ZONE FROM EXISTING at n
CULVERT AT SCATES STREET TO NEW CULVERT 640 FEET DOWNSTREAM. \ INSrALLCIASS IPPRAP FOOTER DEPTHS BELOW
18' MAC THICIPE:S SUBSTRATE
M
12 should todad to banldul
LD N OF TIPSTPEAN OFTIE
SHG
9klJon a sbumbak NOTE: THE HEADER ROCK
L
WILL CAUSE
m
L
R
?
above basebwtopdVwtor D1A
LYTO DAW GAPS.
.RRMSH n BE TTEDNM
FAI
LLRE
akntlon. eASSIwv
w IYA I[V4
-
SHEET
4

OF 4
I
C14 -OW-co2
APPALACHIAN F,NVIRONMENTAL SE.RVICE.5
LAND & WATER -- DESIGN & BUILD
"The art in restoration is in the application. "®
11 July, 2005 D ????D??D
JUL 1 4 2N5
Kevin Barnett
Environmental Chemist ps WATER QUXTAE RTY H
NC DENR, Division of Water Quality
R
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. 70 Hwy
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Re: Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
Browning Branch Streambank Stabilization and Riparian Area Restoration
NCDWQ# 04-0462
USACE Action ID No. 200531690
Haywood County, NC
Dear Mr. Barnett,
Haywood Vocational Opportunities is a private, not-for-profit corporation providing vocational
,training and employment to adults with disadvantages and disabilities. To secure undercutting
streambanks and to improve the line of sight from the existing complex to a newly constructed
complex, we were hired to restore the streambanks and to improve the riparian vegetation along
the stream.
The Pre-Construction Notification form and Stabilization Plan was submitted to the NC Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ), NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) and the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) on 20 April, 2005 for the stabilization of streambank on Browning Branch at
the Haywood Vocational Opportunities facility in Haywood County, NC. I received a letter dated
10 May, 2005 requesting further information on 18 May, 2005. I mailed a reply on 18 May, 2005
answering your questions. On 2 June, 2005 we called you, David McHenry (NCWRC) and
Rebekah Newton (USACE) to request an on-site meeting. We had an on-site meeting on 6 June,
2005. During this on-site meeting everyone was okay with the proposed project and it was
stated that the permits would be issued three days later on Thursday, 9 June, 2005.
The following is in response to Mr. Roger Edwards Notice-of-Violation letter dated 30 June, 2005
regarding the streambank stabilization on Browning Branch at the Haywood Vocational
Opportunities in Haywood County, NC.
367 Scotts Creek Road, Sylva, NC 28779
828.586.1973 Phone [phone] Fax
[e-mail]
www.appalachianenvironment.cwm
5,91-, NC = Lake Glenville, NC = Long Creek, 5C
s
I
Instream Structures and Rock Structures
The J-Hook veins used on-site have been used throughout the mountains of western North
Carolina for over 7 years and numerous years throughout the United States. These structures
have been used on small trout streams and large rivers for trout habitat creation and for
streambank stabilization. The J-hook vanes were installed in accordance with the site meeting 6
June, 2005 at 11:30 a.m. at the project site. The veins were installed using the specifications
recommended by the NCDWQ for streambank stabilization throughout the State. Furthermore,
the veins withstood the increased shear stress and channel velocity of Tropical Storm Arlene,
which was almost an out of bank storm event, and Tropical Storm Christy. [MRH, Ph.D., PWS,
RF] [JCD, E. 1., IEE]
Rock Vein Deflecting Stormflow during Tropical Storm Christy
(7 July, 2005)
Our Qua/iFcations
AES is a woman owned business (state certified) based in Sylva, NC and has been designing and
constructing stream and wetland projects throughout the Southeastern United States for over 7
years. The AES staff has education and experience in civil and environmental engineering,
environmental management, construction management and environmental construction. Our
environmental operators have been conducting grading and excavating projects in Western North
Carolina for over 30 years and a couple of them worked for the NC Division of Forest Resources
in the early 1970s. I have researched and applied stream geomorphology for over 15 years to
streams in Western North Carolina. I have a Bachelor of Science degree in physics with a minor
in mathematics, a Master of Science degree in forest hydrology specializing in geomorphology
and riparian buffers and a Doctor of Philosophy degree in civil and environmental engineering. I
have worked for the Coweeta Hydrological Laboratory, Clemson University and the NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. While working at Clemson I conducted
research at the Coweeta Hydrological Laboratory, where I analyzed numerous mountain
watersheds for shape, dimension and profile. Mr. David Rosgen, P.H. was a principal reviewer
for my research. Mr. Rosgen is a world renowned designer and installer of stream restoration
projects. Mr. Rosgen's techniques have also served as the basis for all stream work in North
Carolina. During the mid-1990's, Mr. Rosgen distributed my research findings at workshops that
he conducted throughout the Southeast. While at Clemson I also worked with Dr. Allen B. Dunn,
Director of the Clemson Institute of Environmental Toxicology, on analyzing watershed
management techniques. My research and projects have been referenced by Dr. Greg Jennings,
P.E. of the NC State University Watershed Institute and by the US Environmental Protection
Agency.
I
My other qualifications include certification as a Professional Wetland Scientist, a Registered
Forester and a Candidate for certification as a Senior Ecologist. I belong to numerous local and
national environmental organizations, such as the American Ecological Engineering Society,
Ecological Society of America and the National Society of Consulting Soil Scientists. I am the
Chairman of the Jackson County Chapter of Ducks Unlimited and I am an active member of
Engineers without Borders - USA. I am also a Board Member of the Jackson County Erosion and
Sediment Control Appeals Board and the Yellow Creek Botanical Institute, a group specializing in
the establishment native species for WNC. I have the science and design education and
experience to conduct environmental projects from the design phase through the construction
phase to the planting stage. At your leisure, please review the attached paper and magazine
article covering recurrence intervals for bankfull storm events in the Southern Appalachian
Mountains. [MBH, Ph.D., PWS, RF][JCD, E.L, IEE]
Stream Buffers
The buffer area was inundated with non-native invasive vines and shrubs, the project mainly
consisted of removing the invasive understory and replanting with native species. Vegetation
present is Morrow's Honeysuckle (Lonicera morrowii), Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora) and
Common Privet (Ligustrum vulgare). When the invasive species are removed that area will be
blanketed with coir matting, seeded with native grasses and planted in the Fall with native woody
shrub species such as Redbud (Cercis Canadensis), Doghobble (Leucothoe axillaries), Button
Bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Silky Dogwood (Corpus amomum), Witch-Hazel (Hamamelis
virginiana), Winterberry (Ilex verticillata) and Yellow-Root (Xanthorhiza simplicissima). The
majority of the existing overstory tree species are Yellow Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), Red
Maple (Acerrubrum), American Dogwood (Corns florida), Black Walnut (Juglans nigra), Yellow
Buckeye (Aesculus octandra) and Black Willow (Salix nigra). We will only remove the dead trees
or the trees that cannot be saved through the stabilization efforts. The upper reaches of the
project do not have any existing vegetation and these areas will be planted. Because of this
effort the stream and trout buffer will be healthier. I have researched streamside buffers at the
Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory with Dr. Lloyd Swift and have authored numerous reports on the
subject for the N.C. Division of Forest Resources. [,6B, Ph.D., PWS, RF][JCD, E.I., ZEE]
During the site visit Ms. Newton and your self stated that you "did not care what took place
outside of the stream and that work could proceed". Furthermore, Roger Edwards stated on 16
June at 2:40 p.m. that "the buffer area was not within the jurisdiction of the NCDWQ or the
USACE". Also would the forested areas within the Streamside Management Zone (SMZ) be
regulated by the NC Forest Practices Guidelines Related to Water Quality (FPGs) - 15A NCAC 1I
.0100 -.0209 and not the Clean Water Act? Further, under Section 404, an exemption exists for
silvicultural (i.e. timber management, wildlife management, recreation, etc.), farming or ranching
activities. Removing invasive species and replanting with native riparian species is definitely a
silvicultural activity. Furthermore, since the rock veins were installed to protect a silvicultural
activity (the replanting of the SMZ) wouldn't they also be exempt? [MBH, Ph.D., PWS, RF][JCD,
IEE]
Our Qua/irications
See previous information. Furthermore, we also have an associate that works with us that has a
doctorate in fisheries biology over 30 years experience with trout and riparian zones in Western
North Carolina.
Rock Wall
We did not stabilize the area around the wall because a relocation of the stream was necessary.
And you were not allowing the relocation to occur. This was made clear at 11:37 a.m. on the 6
June meeting. I still recommend that the stream be relocated away from the wall. [MBH, Ph.D.,
PWS, RFJ [JCD, E.I., TEE]
Our Qualifications
See previous information.
Excavated Rock
The hand placed rock at the toe of the coir matting will be hand placed back into the stream.
The hand placed stream cobble was used because David McHenry (NCWRC) stated at 11:45 a.m.
on the 6 June meeting that he did not want us to use riprap on the toe of the stream channel,
even though that is a standard practice in stream stabilization. [MBH, Ph.D., PWS, RFJ
Our Qualifications
See previous information.
Fiber Matting
The hand placed rock at the toe of the coir matting will be hand placed back into the stream.
,The hand placed stream cobble was used because David McHenry (NCWRC) stated at 11:45 a.m.
on the 6 June meeting that he did not want us to use riprap on the toe of the stream channel,
even though that is a standard practice in stream stabilization. Otherwise, the matting was
installed correctly (please see following picture). [MBH, Ph.D., PWS, RFJ
Bank Protected by Fiber Matting during Tropical Storm Christy
(7 July, 2005)
j
Our Qualifications
See previous information.
Grass
The bare areas will be reseeded. [MBH, Ph.D., PWS, RFJ[JCD, E.I., IEE][JAW, CM]
Our Qualifications
See previous information.

Summary
The forested areas within the Streamside Management Zone (SMZ) are regulated by the NC
Forest Practices Guidelines Related to Water Quality (FPGs) - 15A NCAC 11 .0100 -.0209.
Further, the Clean Water Act Section 404 has an exemption exists for silvicultural (i.e. timber
management, wildlife management, recreation, etc.), farming or ranching activities. Removing
invasive species and replanting with native riparian species is definitely a silvicultural activity.
Furthermore, since the rock veins were installed to protect a silvicultural activity (the replanting
of the SMZ) wouldn't they also be exempt?
Streamside Management Zone (SMZ) be regulated by the NC Forest Practices Guidelines Related
to Water Quality (FPGs) - 15A NCAC 11 .0100 -.0209 and not the Clean Water Act? Further,
under Section 404, an exemption exists for silvicultural (i.e. timber management, wildlife
management, recreation, etc.), farming or ranching activities. Removing invasive species and
replanting with native riparian species is definitely a silvicultural activity. Furthermore, as many
farmers construct berms to protect their crops, would it not be a similar case for a forester to use
rock veins to protect bare root seedlings (a silvicultural activity)?
We have worked with other not-for-profit groups in Haywood County to restore and improve the
environment. We have also conducted environmental field trips to the HVO site for classes from
local schools and colleges to see firsthand environmental stewardship in Haywood County.
Professors and teachers from local schools have stated that the environmental project at HVO is
what other landowners should be doing in the county. Haywood Vocational Opportunities has
also been contacted by funding groups to assist in the removal of invasive species and the
reforestation on the remainder of Browning Branch.
The employees of our company are native to the mountains and our company is in Western
North Carolina to improve the environment for people and to create habitat for animals, thus we
do not understand the animosity. We see people frequently that are blatantly harming the
'environment and are not being stopped. AES and HVO both are trying to improve the
environment and the working conditions of handicapped citizens in Haywood County and nothing
else. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 828-586-1973 extension
302 or by mobile at 828-342-3269.
Sincerely,
.?U
Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, RF
Vice President
Cc: George Marshall, Director, Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
David Probst, Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
Lewis Clark, Senior Project Manager, Clark & Leatherwood, Inc.
Representative Charles Taylor, US House of Representatives - District 11
Senator Keith Presnell, NC State Senate - District 47
Senator John Snow, NC State Senate - District 50
Representative R. Phillip Haire, NC State House - District 119
U.S. Attorney, Western District of North Carolina
S. Kenneth Jolly, Chief, Regulatory Division, USACE, Wilmington District
Scott McLendon Field Office Chief USA
CE Asheville Regulatory Office
Rebekah Newton, Regulatory Intern, USACE, Asheville Regulatory Office
Cyndi Karoly, 401 Program Supervisor, NCDWQ, Wetlands Unit
Roger Edwards, Regional Supervisor, NCDWQ, Asheville Regional Office
David McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Marc Pruett, Erosion Control Specialist, Haywood County
Rebecca Fox, US Environmental Protection Agency
Brian Cole, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Rebecca Henson, DBE, CEM, President and Environmental Manager, AES
Joseph Deal, E.I., IEE, Project Manager, AES
James Walker, CM, Construction Manager, AES
Kris Williams, Esquire, Attorney at Law
Attached: Roger Edwards Letter dated 30 June, 2005.
s
Roger C. Edwards Letter
(30 June, 2005)

F WAIF
_Q?O 9QG Michael P. Ersley, Governor
co y William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
> P North Carolina DepartrrtenE of Environment and Natural W sources
Alan W. Klimek, RE ' )ireewr
Division of W atet Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 30, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED - 7002 0450 0001 9899 0904
David Probst
Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO)
Post Office Box 3007
Hazelwood, NC 28738
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement
Failure to Permit Culverting Activities
NOV-2005-CV-0018
Browning Branch
Haywood County
Dear Mr.' Probst:
While performing a follow-up site visit in regards to the application submitted by your consultant, Mr.
Mickey B. Henson, to both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) to stabilize a segment of Browning Branch (C, Trout), Kevin. Barnett o' the
Asheville, Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality discovered that work, far in exceedance of
both the application request, and the agreed upon scope of work during the site meeting between the
USACOE, the DWQ and your consultant have been performed on your property without first obtaining
a Section 404 Permit and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Section 404 and 401 are part of
the Clean Water Act). Additionally, this activity is a violation of NCGS § 143 -215.1(a)(10) the
excavation of bedload material does not comply with the appropriate Water Quality General
Certification (GC3495) standard conditions.
You must perform the following in order to bring this project back into compliance with the NCO
General Statutes and Administrative Code:
• You will be required to either remove all of the un-permitted instream structures installed on
the property, or upon the issuance of a Permit from the USACOE and a General Certification
from the DWQ for appropriate stabilization of this stream segment. No further work of any type
should be performed on this site (outside of the required maintenance of approved sediment
and erosion control devices) until permits f certifications are secured.
North Carolina Division of Water duality 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
In,ernet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Aecycledll0% Post Consumer Paper
N0n;`thCvolina
f? A?llilJ??lf
Phone [phone] Custorw Sen ice
FAX [phone];43
Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO)
Construction Without a Permit
Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Page 2.
• As the stream-side buffers have been impacted in a far greater length than agreed upon
onsite, the entire stream segment must be replanted in appropriate vegetation to a distance of
25 feet on either side of the stream for the entire stream segment between the bridges on the
property (exclusive of the concrete wail, where back filling behind the wall with soil to prevent
failure and the planting of shrubs between the top of wall and the existing fence). Given the
time of year, this may require pots and balls, though live stakes of willows may be possible.
No matter the method of planting, all buffer re-establishment must comply with the attached
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration.
All excavated rock from the stream channel must be hand placed back in the channel. (This
includes all of the stone placed under the fiber matting installed stream-side onsite.)
All of the fiber matting along the stream is not properly toed in at the stream / bank interface,
and must be re-installed so that erosive stream velocities do not flow under the matting. This
can be accomplished with the installation (by hand) of large rip-rap at this interface with the
matting help under the rip-rap. (This is not a wholesale rip-rapping of the banks, but a single
row of hand placed rip-rap solely to hold down the fiber matting and provide interstitial spaces
at the waters edge for aquatic habitat.)
The rock structures are unconventional and are neither what was discussed
during the onsite meeting, and are not serving the desired purpose of moving agreed
stream
velocities back to the center of the channel. These must be removed and replaced with the
agreed upon structures which are properly installed with at least 50% on the boulders next to
the stream bank being tied into the bank and buried for high flow stability. All structures must
comply with the attached diagram.
An;onsite visit indicates rye grass has been planted and is coming up, but it does not appear to
be thriving. Additional seeding with millet should occur as quickly as possible. There was a
flood mark about two foot up the bank on the matting. It is understood that millet establishes
itself quickly and can get up above the matting quicker.
As this office is preparing a recommendation for Civil Penalty Assessment for the above referenced
violations,' you may submit within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of this notice any justificatior for
these violations for the Director's consideration in the Civil Penalty Assessment process. You may be
subject you to civil penalties of up to $10,000.00 per day, per incident, as per N.C.G.S. 143-251.1 {s).
Additionally, you must submit a timeline for re-submission of your applications to this office and the
DWQ / 401 Permitting Office in Raleigh, which would provide for the above requested items.
I FC1YVVUVU vuVctaVrldl Vj.1l.3UflUFlllies (rivuj
Construction Without a Permit
Notice',of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Page 3.
By copy of this Notice of Violation, the Division of Water Ouality is hereby requesting that all
county permits (including Building Permits and Certificates of Occupancy) be held until such
a time that this site is brought back into compliance with all State Regulations.
If you have any questions, you may contact Mr. Kevin Barnett kevin.barnett@ncmail net or me at
828.296.4500.
Sincerely,
1
Roger C. Edwards, Asheville Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
cc: Mickey B. Henson
Appalachian Environmental Services
Post Office Box 52
Webster, NC 28788
Mrs: Cyndi Karoly, 401 I Wetland Permitting
Mr. Danny Smith, 401 Compliance
Ms. Janet Boyer, Division of Land Resources
Transylvania County Building Inspectors Office
Transylvania County Health Department
Ms. Rebekah Newton, US Army Corps of Engineers

Hydrology Report by Dr. Mickey B. Henson

1
ESTIMATING THE BANKFULL EVENT IN SMALL WATERSHEDS
OF THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN MOUNTAINS
Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, RF
Principal Hydrologist
Appalachian Environmental Services
j Sylva, North Carolina 28779
* Dr. Henson was a Clemson University graduate student working
at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory while conducting this
research.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to distinguish the characteristics of
the bankfull event on nine gaged streams at the Coweeta Hydrologic
Laboratory located in Otto, North Carolina. Hydrologic measurements
were taken during various flows between August 1992 and August 1993.
Visual indicators of the bankfull event were identified for each stream.
The most reliable indicators were: (1) top of point bars, (2) the
line of exposed rocks and/or roots, (3) the permanent vegetation line,
and (4) where the bank slope changes from steep to gentle. Velocities
during the estimated and observed bankfull flow ranged from 0.305 to
I
1.22 m/sec. For eight of the nine study watersheds the recurrence
probability for bankfull flows on the Annual Maximum Series is 1.03 to
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironment.com

2
1.26 yr. Alternatively on the Partial Duration Series the recurrence
probability is 0.20 to 0.30 yr, or 3 to 5 times/yr. These numbers
indicate that the bankfull event occurs in the Southern Appalachians
more often than bankfull events in the Western states, whose bankfull
probability on the Annual Maximum Series is generally accepted as 1.5
yr.
INTRODUCTION
The shape of a stream channel is the result of many interrelated
factors. Channel geometry describes the physical shape, size and
characteristics of a stream and is related to debris loads (debris size,
amount, lithology and debris forms) and to hydraulic factors (velocity,
slope, roughness and flow frequency). For natural streams, the channel
is self-formed and self-adjusted by the water and debris that moves
through it.
Although the channel is formed and maintained in part by the flow
I
it carries, it is never large enough to carry all discharges that occur.
Some floods will overflow the channel banks and enter the floodplain,
which is the area adjoining a channel constructed by the stream at times
of high discharge. However, infrequent extreme flow events are not the
main factors shaping the stream channel. Smaller events known as
bankfull flows are primarily responsible for maintaining channel shape
and dimensions (Dunne and Leopold, 1978).
The ability to determine bankfull flow has practical value.
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironment.com
s
3
Bankfull flows, in conjunction with other stream parameters,
may be used to delineate the area inundated by floods and to establish
the frequency of inundation. Bankfull level also can be used as a
predictor of other hydrologic parameters (channel morphology, bankfull
j
discharge, and drainage basin area), which would provide inventory data
for use with aquatic habitat or biological studies (Clingenpeel, 1988).
Bankfull flow is a critical measurement in Rosgen's stream
classification system (1994). In this system, both entrenchment (flood-
prone width divided by bankfull width) and stream width-depth ratios
(bankfull width divided by mean bankfull depth) depend heavily on an
accurate bankfull estimate. Meander, wavelength, and radius of
curvature in streams also are closely related to bankfull width.
The level of bankfull flow is relatively difficult to distinguish
on small Southern Appalachian streams. These streams are often high-
gradient channels in confined valleys or gorges with little or no
floodplain. They have complex land-use histories and support diverse
and vigorous vegetation communities. All these factors tend to mask or
confuse the determination of the bankfull stage in the field.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to:
1. determine reliable visual indicators of bankfull depth for
small Southern Appalachian streams,
2. compare bankfull flows estimated from visual indicators with
the weir discharges during a bankfull event,
3. determine the recurrence interval and duration of bankfull
flow in these streams.
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironment.com
i
4
STUDY AREA
The study was conducted on nine experimental forested watersheds,
ranging from 12 to 760 ha in size (Table 1), at the USDA Forest
Services Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in southwestern North Carolina.
These watersheds are located within the Blue Ridge Province of the
Appalachian Mountain Physiographic Division. All but Watershed 1 are
reference watersheds, i.e., they have not received any vegetation
manipulation in more than 60 yr. Each watershed in this study is gaged
i
by either a 90 degree, 120 degree V-notch, or a 12-ft Cippolletti sharp-
crested weir, most with over 50 yr of continuous flow record (Swank and
Crossley, 1988).
Within the Coweeta basin, frequent precipitation (long-term
records indicate an average of over 130 storms fairly evenly distributed
throughout the year) sustains high evapotranspiration rates and humid
climate. The Laboratory is located within one of the highest rainfall
regions in the East, with annual rainfall varying from 1778 mm at 671 m
to 2540 mm at 1524 m. Rainfall from convection storms predominates
during the summer months, whereas precipitation during the dormant
season is usually associated with frontal activity (Swank and Crossley,
1988).
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironment.com

5
Elevations of the gaging stations in the study are all above 670 m
in elevation. Maximum elevations of the study watersheds range from
about 991 m to approximately 1600 m above sea level and mean channel
gradients range from 18 to 37%. Mean annual temperature is 12.0 degrees
Celsius and ranges from an average of 11.7 C in the winter to 21.6 C in
the summer. Soils are generally sandy loams formed from a base rock of
mica gneiss, granite gneiss, and mica schist that have undergone
metamorphosis (Dils, 1957). The weathered solum on slopes at lower
i
elevations is often 15 m or more deep, whereas soils are immature and
shallow at elevations greater than 1370 m. Soils which have developed
under hardwood forests usually have infiltration rates exceeding the
maximum rate of rainfall observed in the area; therefore, overland flow
is uncommon and most water reaches streams by subsurface flow (Hibbert,
1961; Swank and Crossley, 1988).
The streams in this study covered a range of sizes. Watershed 1,
one of the smallest streams, had a width of 0.46 m at the study site;
Watershed 8, one of the largest streams, had a width of 3.20 m.
The drainage pattern is dendritic and stream density is high,
often 6.22 km of streams per km2 of land area. Steep sloping mountains,
deep soils, and humid climate all combine to give the Coweeta Hydrologic
Laboratory relatively stable, year-round stream flows.
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironment.com

j
6
Table 1. Characteristics of Watersheds used in Bankfull Study in the
Coweeta Basin
-------------------------------------------------------
WS# WS AREA MAXIMUM CHANNEL YEARS
ELEV. GRADIENT OF
(ha) (m) (%-) RECORD
-------------------------------------------------------
1 16.2 986.6 26.0 56
2 12.1 1004.3 30.3 55
8 759.6 1599.8 22.6 56
9 723.6 1553.5 24.3 56
14 61.6 991.8 18.2 53
18 12.5 992.9 18.9 52
27 38.9 1453.8 33.2 44
34 32.8 1184.1 23.7 33
36 48.6 1541.9 37.1 48
METHODS
Visual Indicators of Bankfull Level
Visual indicator criteria were applied to mark bankfull depth on
channel walls of nine Coweeta streams (Watersheds 1, 2, 8, 9, 14, 18,
27, 34, 36), choosing sites that had uniform and undistorted flow during
the bankfull stage. No significant flows joined the channel between the
test section and the weir.
The indicating criteria represent expected results of active
channel shaping and maintaining processes. Most channels have a nearly
vertical wall at normal water depth which changes as elevation increases
to a sloped or flat floodplain. The elevation where the bank slope
changes drastically may be the level of bankfull or channel-maintaining
flow. On gently sloping banks, the level of channel-maintaining flows
may be indicated by changes in sediment size. A point bar is a deposi-
Appalachian Environmental Services
www. appalachianenvironment. com
i
7
tional feature of the stream where bedload material has been dropped
during high flows. Therefore, the top of the point bar may suggest the
level of bankfull flow. Temporary vegetation may be present and/or
permanent vegetation may be disturbed where the channel-maintaining flow
has occurred. Also, roots and rocks will be exposed when high storm
flows remove the finer particles from the bank (Dunne & Leopold, 1978).
All of these features may be indicators of bankfull flow.
Markers were inserted into the bank at the depth suggested by
those bankfull criteria present at each site. Marking each site
allowed repeated observations during storms.
Comparison of Estimated and Weir Bankfull Flows
Sites were visited during storms to verify bankfull flows.
Storm discharges were calculated from cross-sectional measurements of
width and depth, plus measured velocity, using the equation of Dunne and
Leopold (1978):
Q= W x V x D, [1]
where W is channel width, V is the mean velocity, measured with a pygmy
meter, and D is average channel depth during the storm.
The calculated discharges were compared to measured discharges
at each weir. A strong similarity between the calculated discharge,
based on stream geometry and the weir discharge would confirm that
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviroriment.com
8
i
bankfull flows could be accurately estimated from cross-section
measurements.
Recurrence Interval
Recurrence interval (RI) is the average interval of time within
which the magnitude of a peakflow event is equaled or exceeded once
(Chow, 1964). Wolman and Miller (1960) and Dunne and Leopold (1978)
suggested that the flow during a bankfull event corresponds to the 1.5
yr recurrence interval on the Annual Maximum Series. The Annual Maximum
Flow Series (AMS) is a tabulation of each annual maximum peak flow value
from the weir record. A similar tabulation using all largest storm peaks
is called the Partial Duration Series (PDS). The 1.5 yr recurrence
interval (Dunne and Leopold 1978), or bankfull flow once every 1 to 3
yr, on the Annual Maximum Series is equivalent to a recurrence interval
of 0.92, or 1.1 times each yr, on the Partial Duration Series. Two
questions were asked: 1) what is the flow versus RI relationship from
the long term record at each weir for both series and 2) what is the RI
for the storm flow at each site, determined from the depth defined by
the bankfull markers?
Annual Maximum Series
The flow-frequency methods described by Dalrymple (1960) and
Dunne and Leopold (1978) were used to determine the recurrence interval
(RI) of all storm flows. Peak flows in is-1 (liters per second) were
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviromnent.com

9
expressed in the area-weighted or is-1km2 (liters per second per square
kilometer) by dividing each is"1 value by its watershed area. Discharges
were then ranked from largest to the smallest, the largest storm having
a rank of 1. The RI of each annual maximum discharge from the nine
study watersheds was calculated using Dalrymple's formula:
RI = (N+1) / M, [2]
where RI is the recurrence interval in years, N is the number of years
i
of record, and M is each individual storm's rank.
For each weir record, annual maximum flows were plotted over
their respective RI on Gumbel Type I extreme value graph paper. Because
of scatter in graphed points, we chose to fit regressions to the maximum
annual flow versus RI data and solve the equation for the smoothed
estimate of RI for the apparent bankfull flow value. Adapting Chow's
(1964) equation, the recurrence intervals were linearized by:
K = 1.19245 - 0.7797 x In In (RI / RI-1), [3]
where K is the frequency factor that is a transformation of the
recurrence interval that linearizes the Gumbel Type I distribution.
The annual peak discharges were then regressed against the transformed
recurrence intervals, K, to obtain a linear relationship. For any storm
flow, the RI can be solved at the related K value using the inverse of
Equation 3:
1/RI = 1 - exp( -exp[ - (K-1.19245) / 0.7797]). [4]
The recurrence intervals of bankfull for all nine watersheds
Appalachian Environmental Services
www. appalachianenvironment.com

10
were compared to investigate the proposition that our selection of
visual bankfull indicators yielded a consistent recurrence interval for
bankfull flow.
Partial Duration Series
Dunne and Leopold (1978) suggested using the partial duration
series to determine the duration of the bankfull event. A partial
duration series for a stream not only includes the single maximum flow
for each year, but all the large storm peaks, even if two or more occur
in the same year. At Coweeta, an available data set tabulated all peaks
greater than or equal to 100 is-lkm"2 for each of the study watersheds.
These were ranked from largest to smallest and the data set was reduced
so that the partial duration series contained only as many large floods
as there were years of record, a procedure similar to the annual
exceedance series described by Chow, pp. 8-20 (1964). If peaks occur
together so that they cannot be considered independent storms, the
larger of the two was chosen to represent the event.
As in the annual maximum series, the discharge at the indicated
bankfull depth was used to estimate which recurrence interval on the
partial duration series corresponds to bankfull conditions.
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviroriment.com

11
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Visual Indicators of Bankfull Level
Visual identification of bankfull flow on large streams in
alluvial bottoms is relatively easy. However, small streams in the
Southern Appalachians rarely have alluvial bottoms. Smaller mountain
i
streams seldom develop distinctive topographic breaks between the bank
and the floodplain common in larger streams and rivers. Therefore,
bankfull flow was estimated by observing vegetation, bare rock, washed
root line, and change from a steep to gentle bank slope. The bankfull
depths in Table 2 are averages of several measurements that only varied
over a range of 1.52 cm for each watershed. The visual indicators
present at each of the study sites are also shown in Table 2.
This study suggests that the best indicators of bankfull flow in
the Southern Appalachians tend to be signs of repeated erosion and
cleansing of banks and deposition on point bars. A storm larger than
bankfull can erode the stream banks and mask the indicators. In the
Southern Appalachians, the vegetation line is probably the most
difficult indicator to use to determine bankfull depth. Riparian
vegetation in the mountains withstands high flows and may even regrow
quickly into the bankfull area. This is especially true with certain
types of mosses. Some of the problems of determining reliable
indicators of bankfull flow stem from the stream banks being undercut
and caving in. Based on this research it was equally difficult to
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviromnent.com
F
12
determine bankfull over all stream sizes.
Table 2. Visual Indicator Criteria Present at Each Study Site and Used
to Estimate Bankfull Depth
WS # A B C D E F G H Dbf
1
0.058
2 * * * * * 0.052
8 * * * * * * * 0.472
9 * * * * * * * 0.457
14 * * * * * * * * 0.253
18
0.058
27 * * * 0.436
34 * * * * * 0.280
36
0.222
KEY
A. TOPOGRAPHIC BREAK FROM VERTICAL BANK TO FLOODPLAIN
B. TOPOGRAPHIC BREAK FROM STEEP TO GENTLE SLOPE
C. TOP OF POINT BAR
D. CHANGE IN VEGETATION FROM TEMPORARY TO PERMANENT
E. NO FINE DEBRIS BELOW THIS ELEVATION
F. ROCKS AND/OR ROOTS EXPOSED
G. CHANGE IN SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF DEPOSITS
H. CHANGE IN TEXTURE OF FINES DEPOSITED BETWEEN ROCKS
** Dbf is the average bankfull depth based on visual indicators present
at each study site.
Comparison of Estimated and Weir Bankfull Flows
Numerous storms were observed to gain experience with the types
of flows which accomplish channel maintenance. Visiting sites during
storms is a valuable check on the cross-section and allows making a
comparison between gaged bankfull discharge at the weir and channel
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviro=ent.com

13
geometry at bankfull in the cross-section. In this study bankfull width
(Wbf), average velocity at the bankfull stage (Vbf), and average
bankfull depth (Dbf) were observed and bankfull discharge (Qbf)
calculated. Measurements taken at the sites during storms verified that
bankfull flow on the nine study watersheds, as indicated by visual
indicators, does compare almost exactly with measured storm flows at the
weir (Table 3).
According to Rosgen (1994), the velocity during bank-full flow
usually ranges from 1.37 to 2.13 m/sec. However, Douglass (1974) states
that velocities of this size correspond to the 20 to 50 yr floods at
Coweeta. As Table 3 illustrates, the average velocity during bankfull
flow ranges from 0.39 to 1.13 m/sec. These lower velocities may be due
to the fact that Rosgen studied larger streams than the streams measured
at Coweeta.
Recurrence Interval
Annual Maximum Series
In the west, bankfull flow often is the annual spring snowmelt
i
event that is sustained for several hours. Wolman and Miller (1960) and
Dunne and Leopold (1978) suggested that the flow during this event
corresponds to the 1.5 yr recurrence interval on the Annual Maximum
Series (AMS). However, in the Southeastern mountains the bankfull event
can come any time of the year and is sustained for less than one hour.
Flow frequency data at Coweeta show that the marked bankfull stages are
created by a flow that occurs more frequently than the 1.5 yr recurrence
interval. It is evident that bankfull flow requires several of these
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironment.com

14
more frequent storms per year to shape and maintain the stream channel,
so duration is an additional factor in defining the bankfull event.
For each weir record, the linearizing parameter, K, was
calculated for the RI of each maximum flow (equation 3). Fitted
regression equations were derived for K on peak flow and smoothed
estimates of K were estimated from the equations at the observed
bankfull flow rates (Table 4). Smoothed estimates of RI from the Annual
Maximum Series for the bankfull events were transformed back by equation
4 from those K values.
Eight of the study watershed's recurrence intervals (RI)
estimate that the bankfull event has a probability of occurring once
every 1.03 to 1.26 years (Table 4).
The Partial duration series had a probability of 0.20 to 0.30 yr, or 3
to 5 times a yr, for eight of the study watersheds (Table 5). watershed
8 has a longer recurrence interval due to the fact that it is a
relatively large stream and drains the largest watershed at Coweeta (760
ha).
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvirotitnent.com

15
Table 3. Comparison of measured discharge at each site with the gaged
flow at the nearby weir for a set of near bankfull sized storms.
WS # STORM Wbf AVG. AVG. SITE WEIR
DATE Vbf Dbf Qbf Qbf
(m/d/y) (m) (m/s) (m) (1/s) (1/s)
1 9/5/92 0.83 0.85 0.043 30.00 30.02
2 8/28/92 1.51 0.39 0.035 21.00 20.96
8 8/28/92 6.64 0.94 0.314 1971.19 1971.19
9 8/28/92 4.49 1.13 0.286 1447.81 1447.52
14 8/28/92 1.29 0.82 0.157 167.38 167.10
18 8/28/92 1.93 0.40 0.032 24.36 24.64
27 8/29/92 3.31 0.70 0.156 362.52 362.52
34 8/28/92 1.45 0.49 0.084 58.91 58.91
36 8/28/92 3.98 0.61 0.143 346.94 346.37
Table 4. Estimation of recurrence interval for the annual maximum
series from the regression for annual peak flow on fitted recurrence
intervals.
WS # REGRESSION Qbf* K AMS RI
EQUATION (1/s/km2) (yr)
1 K=(Q+100.60)/340.30 186.29 0.843 1.26
2 K=(Q+108.26)/366.65 170.89 0.761 1.21
8 K=(Q-100.60)/329.25 259.53 0.483 1.09
9 K=(Q-130.13)/364.35 200.08 0.192 1.03
14 K=(Q-109.35)/247.90 272.00 0.656 1.16
18 K=(Q-50.30)/277.64 195.14 0.522 1.10
27 K=(Q-469.11)/1112.64 927.54 0.412 1.07
34 K=(Q-44.83)/64.19 180.25 2.110 3.77
36 K=(Q-83.11)/827.56 713.84 0.762 1.21
*Calculated from righthand column of Table 3.
The large recurrenc e interval for WS34 agrees with other Coweeta
observations that this stream is one of the least responsive to this
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviromnent.com

16
areas high rainfall (Swank and Crossley, 1987). Dunne and Leopold
(1978), in the comparison of recurrence intervals for New Fork River at
Boulder, Wyoming, suggest that a recurrence interval of 1.28 yr
reasonably approximates the expected value of 1.5 yr.
Partial Duration Series
The 1.5 yr recurrence interval (Dunne and Leopold 1978), or
bankfull flow once every 1 to 3 yr, on the Annual Maximum Series is
equivalent to a recurrence interval of 0.92, or 1.1 times each yr, on
the Partial Duration Series (PDS). This project has revealed that the
bankfull event on the PDS occurs more often in mountain streams not
dominated by a once-a-year snowmelt event, such as occurs in many
Western states.
Table 5. Comparison of the Recurrence Intervals for each
of the Study Watersheds
WS#
RI from AMS (years)
RI from PDS (years)
1 1.26
2 1.21
8 1.09
9 1.03
14 1.16
18 1.10
27 1.07
34 3.77
? 36 1.21
0.20
0.21
0.46
***
0.15
0.21
0.18
0.30
0.11
*** Data not available.
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironinent.com
1
17
CONCLUSIONS
Bankfull depth in small Southern Appalachian streams can be
accurately estimated using visual indicators. Generally, it is
preferable to use combinations of several indicators rather than single
indicators. The sorting of bank substrate by size is a good clue in
indicating bank-full on the channel bank, but this indicator may be
confused by a pre-existing size distribution in the bank and slumping
from erosion of the stream bank. Probably the best indication of
bankfull flow is when the following four criteria exist together: the
top of a point bar, the line of exposed rock and/or roots, where
permanent vegetation begins, and where the bank slope changes from steep
I
to gentle.
Caution should always be used when estimating bankfull stage where
channel banks have been undercut or have slumped. Vegetation may be a
good indicator, but one must distinguish between temporary and permanent
vegetation. Vegetation growth since the last bankfull flow may mask the
actual level of the bankfull event. Leaf litter in the fall may
disguise other bankfull indicators while a wash line of organic material
may represent one of the latest storms, but not the bankfull storm.
There are numerous estimators of bankfull flow suitable for
Southern Appalachian Mountain streams. An accurate application of the
visual indicator criteria, as well as stream geometry and velocity
measurements, is necessary to accurately calculate bankfull discharge.
The recurrence interval of the bankfull event in small Southern
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviromnent.com

18
Appalachian Mountain streams is lower than that of the larger streams in
the West, which are characterized by a once-a-year snowmelt event. The
probability of the recurrence interval for bankfull flow for Coweeta's
streams range from 1 to 1.3 yr on the Annual Maximum Flow series,
instead of 1.5 yr as suggested in the literature (Wolman and Miller,
1960 and Dunne and Leopold, 1978). Similarly we found RI is about 0.20
to 0.30 yr for the Partial Duration Series, instead of 0.92 yr as
suggested by Dunne and Leopold (1978). The bankfull event has a
probability of occurring more often and for a shorter duration in the
Southern Appalachian Mountain streams than observed for western streams.
This study introduces the concept that the morphology of Southern
Appalachian stream channels are formed and maintained by multiple
bankfull events which are more frequent and smaller velocity than those
in other stream systems.
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenviromnent.com

19
LITERATURE CITED
Chow, V. T., ed. 1964. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Co. 7:26-8:37.
Clingenpeel, A. 1988. Basin area stream survey (BASS) monitoring plan.
USDA Forest Service, Six River National Forest and the Pacific Southwest
Region. 10 pp.
Dalrymple, T. 1960. Flood-frequency analysis--manual of hydrology:
Part 3. Flood-flow techniques. USDI Geol. Surv. Water Supply Paper
1543-A. 80 pp.
Dils, R. E. 1957. A guide to the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory.
Southeast Forest Expt. Sta. U.S. Forest Service. 40 pp., illus.
Douglass, J. E. 1974. Flood frequencies and bridge and culvert sizes
for forested mountains of North Carolina. Southeast For. Exp. Stn.,
USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-4. 21 pp.
Dunne, T. and L. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New
York: Freeman. pp. 590-669.
Hibbert, A. 1961. A study of commonly used hydrologic concepts and
their application in runoff analysis on small mountain watersheds. M.S.
Thesis, Utah State Univ. 80 pp.
Rosgen, D. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers Catena. 22: 169-
199.
Swank, W. T. and D. A. Crossley, Jr., eds. 1987. Forest Hydrology and
Ecology at Coweeta, Ecological Studies 66. New York: Springer-Verlag.
pp. 3-16.
Wolman, M. G. and J. P. Miller. 1960. Magnitude and frequency of
forces in geomorphic processes. J. Geology 68(1):54-74.
Appalachian Environmental Services
www.appalachianenvironinent.com

Hydrology Article by Dr. Mickey B. Henson
(January/February 1999)
W A T E R S H E D M A N A G E M E N T
Estimating the Bankfull Event in
Small Watersheds
byMc,WyB. Henson
THE shape of a stream channel is the
result of many interrelated factors. Channel
geometry describes the physical shape, size
and characteristics of a stream and is related
to debris loads (debris size, amount, litholo.
gy and debris forms) and to hydraulic factors
(velocity, slope, roughness and flow
frequency). For natural streams, the channel
is self-formed and self-adjusted by the water
and debris that moves through it.
Although the channel is fomied and main-
tained in part by the flow it carries, it is never
large enough to carry all discharges that
occur. Some floods will overflow the chari-
nd banks and enter die floodplain, which is
the area adjoining a channel constructed by
the stream at times of high discharge.
However, infrequent extreme flow events
are, not the [Hair[ factors shaping die stieiani
channel. Smaller events known as bankfull
flows are primarily responsible for maintain-
ing cl=nel shape and dimensions.
The ability to determine bankfull flow
(channel maintaining event) has practical
value to hydrologists, fluvial geonaorpholo-
gists, aquatic biologists, and land planners.
itf l.IaVe'l also cart 1
wouI
td~ritf`
" dAl
tort' ,data far bum;
Cream restW_410n;
fe&;:_;.habitat, ci
cat 9t6dies.-
Bankfull flow, in conjunction with other
stream parameters, may be used to delineate
the area inundated by floods (floodplains)
and to establish the frequency of inundation.
Bankfull level also can be used as a predictor
of other hydrologic parameters (channel
morphology, bankfull discharge, and
drainage basin area), which would provide
inventory data for use with stream
restoration, aquatic habitat or biological
studies.
Bankfull flow is a critical measurement in
numerous stream classification systems and
stream restoration methods. In many
systems, both entrenchment and stream
width-depth ratios depend heavily on an
accurate bankfull estimate. Meander, wave-
length, and radius of curvature In streams
also are closely related to bankfull width.
The level of bankfull flow is relatively
difficult to distinguish on small Southern
Appalachian streams. These streams are
often high-gradient channels in confined val-
leys or gorges with little or no floodplain.
They have complex land-use histories and
support diverse and vigorous vegetation
communities. All these factors tend to mask
or confuse the detenirination of the bankfull
stage in the field.
ShAy Area
The study was conducted on nine experi-
mental forested watersheds, ranging from 12
to 760 ba In size, at the USDA Forest Service's
Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in south-
western North Carolina.
These watersheds are located within the
Blue Ridge Province of the Appalachian
!Mountain Physiographic Division. All but
Watershed 1 am reference watersheds, i.e.:
they have not received any vegetation
manipulation in more than 60 years. Fach
watershed in this study is gaga[ by either a
90-degree, 120-degree V-notch, or a 3.7m
(12-ft) Cippolletti sharp crested weir, most
with over 50 yFats of continuous flow record.
Within the Coweeta basin, frequent
precipitation (lung-term records indicate an
average of over 130 storms fairly evenly dis-
tributed throughout the year) sustains high
evapotranspiration rates and humid climate.
The laboratory is located within one of the

slreartr6aMr.
20-January/February 1999 I=W anci'Water
W A T E R S H E D M A N A G E M E N T
highest rainfall regions in the East, with
annual rainfall van7ng from 1778 mrn at 671
m to 2540 mm at 1524 m. Rainfall from
convection storms predominates during the
summer months; whereas precipitation (hir-
ing the dormant season is usually associated
with frontal activity.
Discussion
Rankfull depth in small Southern
Appalachian streams can be accurately
estimated using visual indicators. Generally,
it is preferable to use combinations of several
indicators rather than single indicators. The
sorting of bank substrate by size is a good
clue in indicating banlduil on the channel
bank, but this indicator may be confused by
a pre-cj&ting size distribution in the bank
and slumping from erosion of the stream
bank. Probably the best indication of bank-
full flow is when the following four criteria
exist together die top of a point bar, the line
of exposed rock and/or roots, where perma-
nent vegetation begins, and where the bank
slope dkinges from steep to gentle.
Caution should always he used when
estimating bankfull stage where channel
banks have been undercut or have stomped.
Vegetation may be a good indicator, but one
must distinguish between temporary and
permanent vegetation. Vegetation growth
since the last bankfull flow may mask the
actual level of the baruldull event. leaf litter
in the fall may disguise other bankfull indica-
tors while a wash litre of organic material
may represent one of the latest storms, but
not the bankf all storm
There are numerous estimators of bank-
full flow suitable for Southern Appalachian
Mountain streams. An accurate application
of the visual indicator criteria, as well as
stream geometry and velocity measurements,
is necessary to accurately calculate bankfull
discharge.
The recurrence interval of the bankfull
event in small Southern Appalachian
Mountain streams is lower than that of the
larger streams in the West, which are charac-
terized by a once-a-,year snowmelt Ltent.
'!he prcirbility of the recurtence interval for
bankf iE flow for Coweeta's streams range
from 1 to 1;3 years on the Annual Maximum
Flow series, instead of 15 years as suggested
in the literature. Similarly we found recur-
rence. interval is about 0.20 to 0.30 years for
the Partial Duration Series, instead of 0.92
years as suggested by Dunne and Leopold.
The bankfull event has a probability of
occurring more often and for a shorter dura-
tion in the Southern Appalachian Mountain
streams. This study introduces the concept
that the morphology of Southern
Appalachian stream channels are formed and
maintained by multiple bankfull events
which are more frequent and smaller velocity
than those in other stream systems. WW
For more infonnatim4 conlaer AfOxy B.
Henson, Appalacbian GnVironmenral
Services FO Box.52, Webswr, X 28788-
0052, W8) 5864973, fax [phone]',
e-ntuil: mbhmsonggle.net
JaauatylFeb tuarv 1999.21
For More Intormatiow. Ci,cle a13
US Environmental Protection Agency Report
Referencing Dr. Mickey B. Henson (Henson et al. 1993).
(25 June, 1999)
s
JUN-25-39 16:22 FROM:C P T 3 BRANCH
are relatively sinuous and have bedform morphology
ndicative of a riffle/pool configuration. Streams
;Iossified as "C" streams are indicated by cross-sectional
%vidth/depth ratios generally greater than 12 and are
slightly entrenched, meandering, and silt-clay dominated
with swell developed floodplain. The floodplain, ofwhich
:hose low gradient riverine wetlands are a part, can be
generally classified av a Class C floodplains formed by
frequently recurring flow-events along a laterally stable,
single threaded, low gradient channel (Nanson and Croke,
I992).
In contrastto unaltered stream reaches, the predominant
altered stream class within the study area is "C" forming
within an "F" featuring a deeply incised or entrenched
channel (Rosgen, 1996). The stream channels are
degraded and enlarged such that the stream has been
decoupled from its historic floodplain. For this reason,
bankfull and channelfull stages are defined as follows: 1)
Sankfull stage corresponds to the discharge that on the
long-term does the most channel work such as channel
maintenance, moving sediment, forming or removing bars
and forming or changing bends and meanders (Dunne and
Leopold, 1978). In the southeast, the bankfull stage is
represented by the top of the point bar or the active
floodplain and has a recurrence interval of 1 to 2 years;
and 2) Chamtelfull stage corresponds to the elevation
required to flood the terrace or the historic (abandoned)
floDdplain.
METHODS
The regional dimensionless rating curve was developed
from calibrated hydraulic curves at seven USGS gaging
stations (Dunne and Leopold, 1978 and Leopold, 1994).
The gaging stations were chosen in the study areabased on
a representative range of drainage area sins, adequacy of
hydrological record, availability of channel geometry
(USGS 9-207 forms), and accessibility. Drainage areas
ranged from approximately 15 mi'to 800 mil. A minimum
of 10 years of the most recent hydrological record was
utilized.
The annual' maximum series foreach-gage station was
ranked and the recurrence interval of each flow calculated
using the Weibull flood frequency method (Ritter at al.,
1995). Mean depths of the stream channel were estimated
from cross-sectional areas and widths as reported in USGS
gage summaries (form 9-207). The "K" factor was also
calculated for each entry at each gaging station (Chow,
19(4 and Henson at al., 1993). The "K" factor linearizes
the relationship between flood frequency and discharge
(Henson at al., 1993). Bankfull indicators were identified
Id:404 562 9224 PAGE 3/5
at representative cross sections at each of the seven L`SGS
gaging stations. A subset ofthe sedimentary and boundary
surfaces reported by Williams (1978) was utilized to
establish bankfull dimensions. Indicators of boundary-
surfaces included the elevation of a change in textural
particle size of recently deposited alluvium and the break
in elevation between hydrophytic and perennial (upland)
vegetation. The cross section was surveyed and bankfull
indicators were compared against the elevation at which
the tvidth/depth ratio becomes a minimum (Knighton,
1984 and Williams, 1978). The elevation of bankfull
indicators from the representative cross section was
traversed across the USGS gage record (Harrelson et al.,
1994) to correlate bankfull elevation with the
corresponding stage/discharge relationship and estimated
recurrence interval. Data from field measurements and
from USGS records were used to plot mean depth at
bankfulI (Dbki vs. drainage area; bankfull discharge vs.
drainage area; and a dimensionless rating curve depicting
the ratio of channelfull discharge to bankfull discharge
(Q,,,,/Qkkd vs. mean depth at channelfull to mean depth at
barMull (D,,eV,kr).
Traditional surveying procedures were not precise
enough to detect relatively subtle changes in the minimum
width-depth ratio. Therefore, field indicators were relied
upon to identify the bankfull depth.
RESULTS
Mean depth (Dw) at bankfull for each stream was
calculated from the cross section, plotted against drainage
area (Figure 1), and regressed against drainage area as
follows:
D,,,- 0.49 A'-' (1)
Once D,kf and the corresponding gage height were
determined, the USGS rating table was used to determine
the discharge (Qwo for each stream corresponding to the
associatcd.bankfull.depth. This discharge was plotted
against drainage area (Figure 2), and regressed against
drainage area as follpws:
Qea= 1.46 A'u (2)
The ratio of mean channel depth (Dw) to D,,r was
plotted against the ratio of discharge at channelfull (Q:,t )
to Qkk fto formulate the dimensionless rating curve (Figure
3) (Multiple R = 0.97; R'= 0.94):
Q./Q?tif- .6.69 + 6.1 DO/D,,, (3)
F'wATF
0 9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 30, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED - 7002 0460 0001 9899 0904
David Probst
Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO)
Post Office Box 3007
Hazelwood, NC 28738
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and
Recommendation for Enforcement
Failure to Permit Culverting Activities
NOV-2005-CV-0018
Browning Branch
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Probst:
While performing a follow-up site visit in regards to the application submitted by your consultant, Mr.
Mickey B.; Henson, to both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) to stabilize a segment of Browning Branch (C, Trout), Kevin Barnett of the
Asheville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality discovered that work, far in exceedance of
both the application request, and the agreed upon scope of work during the site meeting between the
USACOE, the DWQ and your consultant have been performed on your property without first obtaining
a Section 404 Permit and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Section 404 and 401 are part of
the Clean Water Act). Additionally, this activity is a violation of NCGS § 143 -215.1(a)(10) the
excavationof bedload material does not comply with the appropriate Water Quality General
Certification (GC3495) standard conditions.
You must perform the following in order to bring this project back into compliance with the NC
General Statutes and Administrative Code:
You,will be required to either remove all of the un-permitted instream structures installed on
the property, or upon the issuance of a Permit from the USACOE and a General Certification
from, the DWQ for appropriate stabilization of this stream segment. No further work of any type
should be performed on this site (outside of the required maintenance of approved sediment
and erosion control devices) until permits / certifications are secured.
N""o,h?Carolina
dvatvmlly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO)
Construction Without a Permit
Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Page 2.
As the stream-side buffers have been impacted in a far greater length than agreed upon
onsite, the entire stream segment must be replanted in appropriate vegetation to a distance of
25 feet on either side of the stream for the entire stream segment between the bridges on the
property (exclusive of the concrete wall, where back filling behind the wall with soil to prevent
failure and the planting of shrubs between the top of wall and the existing fence). Given the
time of year, this may require pots and balls, though live stakes of willows may be possible.
No matter the method of planting, all buffer re-establishment must comply with the attached
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration.
• All excavated rock from the stream channel must be hand placed back in the channel. (This
includes all of the stone placed under the fiber matting installed stream-side onsite.)
All of the fiber matting along the stream is not properly toed in at the stream / bank interface,
and must be re-installed so that erosive stream velocities do not flow under the matting. This
can be accomplished with the installation (by hand) of large rip-rap at this interface with the
matting help under the rip-rap. (This is not a wholesale rip-rapping of the banks, but a single
row of hand placed rip-rap solely to hold down the fiber matting and provide interstitial spaces
at the waters edge for aquatic habitat.)
• The rock structures are unconventional and are neither what was discussed nor agreed upon
during the onsite meeting, and are not serving the desired purpose of moving the stream
velocities back to the center of the channel. These must be removed and replaced with the
agreed upon structures which are properly installed with at least 50% on the boulders next to
the stream bank being tied into the bank and buried for high flow stability. All structures must
comply with the attached diagram.
• An onsite visit indicates rye grass has been planted and is coming up, but it does not appear to
be thriving. Additional seeding with millet should occur as quickly as possible. There was a
flood mark about two foot up the bank on the matting. It is understood that millet establishes
itself quickly and can get up above the matting quicker.
As this office is preparing a recommendation for Civil Penalty Assessment for the above referenced
violations, you may submit within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of this notice any justification for
these violations for the Director's consideration in the Civil Penalty Assessment process. You may be
subject you to civil penalties of up to $10,000.00 per day, per incident, as per N.C.G.S. 143-251.1(a).
Additionally, you must submit a timeline for re-submission of your applications to this office and the
DWQ / 401 Permitting Office in Raleigh, which would provide for the above requested items.
11ayvvvvu v Uk CU1U1 iai vNNui Lui nuCS krn vv)
Construction Without a Permit
Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
Page 3..
By copy of this Notice of Violation, the Division of Water Quality is hereby requesting that all
county permits (including Building Permits and Certificates of Occupancy) be held until such
a time that this site is brought back into compliance with all State Regulations.
If you have any questions, you may contact Mr. Kevin Barnett [e-mail] or me at
828.296.4500.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards, Asheville Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
cc: Mickey B. Henson
Appalachian Environmental Services
Post Office Box 52
Webster, NC 28788
Mrs. Cyndi Karoly, 401 / Wetland Permitting
Mr. Danny Smith, 401 Compliance
Ms. Janet Boyer, Division of Land Resources
Transylvania County Building Inspectors Office
Transylvania County Health Department
Ms. Rebekah Newton, US Army Corps of Engineers
0 ??/7n l'/
t?
JUL 1 4 2005
?1'ETW
DENR 6§QkStr QUAL6
RANCH
i I
APPALACHIAN ENVIKONMENTAL Jc- EKVICE.5
LAND & WATER Z DESIGN & BUILD
"The art in restoration is in the application. "®
it July, 2005
Kevin Barnett
Environmental Chemist
NC DENR, Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. 70 Hwy
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Re: Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
Browning Branch Streambank Stabilization and Riparian Area Restoration
NCDWQ# 04-0462
USACE Action ID No. 200531690
Haywood County, NC
Dear Mr. Barnett,
Attached, please find the stabilization plan that I delivered to Mr. Roger Edwards on 16 June at
2:40 p.m. Also, when a client submits an agent authorization letter along with a Pre-Construction
Notification application doesn't that mean that the Agent is to be contacted and to have the
correspondence with the regulatory agencies?
If you have any questions regarding HVO, please do not hesitate to call me, the Authorized
Agent, at 828-586-1973 extension 302 or by mobile at 828-342-3269.
Sincerely, l
Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, RF
Vice President and Authorized Agent
Cc: George Marshall, Director, Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
David Probst, Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
Lewis Clark, Senior Project Manager, Clark & Leatherwood, Inc.
Rebekah Newton, Regulatory Intern, USACE, Asheville Regulatory Office
367 Scotts Creek Road, Sylva, NC 28779
828.586.1973 Phone [phone] Fax
mickey.henson@appalachianenvironmentcom
www.appalachianemAronmentcom
5ylva, NC = Lake Glenville, NC = Lon¢ Creelc, 5C
Roger Edwards, Regional Supervisor, NCDWQ, Asheville Regional Office
David McHenry, Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Rebecca Henson, DBE, CEM, President and Environmental Manager, AES
Joseph Deal, E.I., IEE, Project Manager, AES
James Walker, CM, Construction Manager, AES
Attached: Agent Authorization Letter dated it April, 2005
Stabilization Plan dated 6 June, 2005
?\?' ?d, oir Ma etJ a awed
-Seeded, Coir ?o ?,_ Q ve,. ecies oved= C? \\
and Straw d q p ? q Sp o ed eom e am I
-Invasive Specie Re ed \ ?a
-Native S ? NVl'1 G)
1 EI.EVAJI,*\ (=f*REW BRIE GE V ? - i1 _? ?..ttt ??
\ AA ?• `?gHa n
R I
' \-Streambank Reshapk ?am37arRc ed
VSeeded, Coir Matted it?nnd'Sl _ ed €d, Coir tM
L OQ ^c`Planted With Native,V§getatoh,; With Nate .c f
CONtyRETE RETAINING o
SLede Coir t abd Str
7030 ena+ ?i?
2729.0"
v 100 YEAR FLOOD
+ .? Seeded, Coir Matted a `qS a4-ed
m i -Invasive Species Rernov d rs3 \ ?? tream haped
, i -Native Species Plantedt S-Ned?. oir tern ahd awed
K G ?db
8Uil[NNG
E%GSTWG ,y*OOD VOCATI ONAL OPPO?/w
-Seeded, Coir M and Str?,wedN'?
-Native Species td
tW YEAR F1-- -`4 ELEVA1tkl . 27370
\\ `° ?`i.S•tr?ambank Re?sha cd 1
\ -Streambank Reshaped ~< Seeded, Coir ICotied and wed
-Seeded, Coir Matted and Stara d -, ativpecie lan'ed
\ -Native Species Planted
\ a
i
,-Seeded, Coir MaM
\ - \ ,;, -Native Species Pie
.' OM EXISTING Iii
Seeded Coir Matted an It?wed -
\ Native Species-Planted- 'i - -
p v -3ROM EXISTING BRIDGE) woe
YEAR FLOOD PLAN ELEVATION ' 2735.0 \"...
SCates Street
N
W E
s
_1
25 12.5 0 25 50 75
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH s 25 FEET
100 YW FL

00
`r ,

Pab
l?

.
-
r
f
LEGEND
EXIS T i vG STREAM
SILT FENCE
ROCK VEIN
HAYWO VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES 11 Lit" = PROPOSED • e
N rn E ?> f SITE STREAMBANK STABALIZATION V F
j;bb HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC °' ? I ?
?
? +? fdlM???Y'M 1 11
Wp OT'F1,000? ? 1`{ ??
G /Jn y
1?

1 r

000 PLAIN EU11111A? 2728.0 ?L \` ,, \ \ \ }

r
?
? \
\
V
\t
\\ ?? 0
1
J
/
n

r 7030`
0
?
'
. •
??
;
'... / ELEVATON 2729
? \ L\ Imo
?
w t00 YEAR FLOOD / t -A
C N RETE REPUNING WA 1 <`? \ N

..
' \d• III •I! ?\ ??aiz}PBtreet
too yw

1 l ypCATONAL OPPORTUNaTES 8 DING' 11 1
9
-b?
TNC NAYNUDG
\
W
1 E7?S
\
l
? (
I
•
?,
t
\ 1 ELEVATION 2732.0 1
100 YEAR FLOOD PWN ?'..
•
L
\ \

?
1

A
I 91p,
71ON s 2735.0
?
.....` / lOO YEAR FLOOD PLAIN EEEVA
0
t.
- Scates Street

v
" LEGEND
W E
_r..._..?_.._. EXIL,1IN3 STRLAM
s
TEMP DIVERSION DITCH
25 12.5 o 25 50 75 SILT FENCE
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH 25 FEET
11

_

?3

EXISTING
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES 4

$? SITE STREAMBANK STABALIZATION
NC
HAYWOOD COUNTY
•
°' g
? r
.?
, ........
r +

a
0 0
>
0 0 Dl
0 0 0
APPROVED BARE ROOT SEEDLING SPECIES
Planting Palette Based Upon Avcilobdit
Redbud (Cerdscnnadensls)
Doghobble (Leumthoe"marls)
Button Bush (Cephalanthus occ0ent0s)
Silky Dogwood (Gamut amomum) 1N
Witch-Hazel (Hamameps vlrylnlana) P
A
Wlnterberry(11" vertldllata) 975
Yellow-Root (XanthoMlza slurp/IGsslma)
• Overslory species will not be removed.
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCEDULE
ALL STABALRED BANKS WILL BE SEEDED WITH AN EROSION CONTROL GRADE
PLANTING MIX AT A RATE OF 60lb/ava. THE BANKS WILL THEN BE COVERED WITH A
100%COIR FIBER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. AREAS OUTSIDE OF STREAMBANKS
WILL BE SEEDED AT A RATE OF Mbfwm AND STRAWED. BARE ROOT TREE AND
SHRUB SPECIES WILL BE PLANTED THROUGHOUT THE RIPARIAN ZONE.
,wt>.t wa alea. a \\_
.YO ? M ilR 11101m
alV ? ArOI sa
aM111 NI ee1Q ewl1.
TRACKING

s rawTne svaurr
/Ot aMtW Mal+

saa wat IO
.® rA seMM AAt sAeN Are ecetw w
.wtsar rcArr em OIIOOOIR alGR
OII M as enpl{/
erue Aer OweaM

'PLVAnQW A00
m A.sa..arettmat.
swam waoov aaetem
ew oer naanr Harm
M uwer Avsrar,wAer nArn,w
?w autwaa
a rreaawwswr ewr s mAOOrAtr?

saAr rw remro
Hat amr mwr

e+te.A watr
Ieellr MIMOt At Aafet M Yree M.sIrlMef ear AleOe
matt Ai
aar+wra wteewtaw
BANK SHAPING AND PLANTING
W art
Rra.awre.ntt pose.n, \
m+enat nY?y r6etnaA+
e rues s raorrre ever roe
cr t.a H• w w._ryr. r_r 1
?iriaw ri:.i f? acv ??'??
PLAN NEW
b
at
rnw w
L EM
v reev
?r L,t,Amr sa CROSS SECIM
ww asaro
ROCK VEIN
9

? z
0
a N
o x
P.
?yz+i
a
o
a
F
Qr ?
z ? Cav
O ?
Q 0
U
Q a
O F
O ?
?CF7?
w
a a
SHEET
4
-OF4
ATSwea mcYrw?yr1?.,
tarwt awa? :f[i.
/ war arat A r+
rpe0

STA 1
1D ?._? --
top of ben
to
f b
k' APPALAGHIAH
0 . :
p o
an

00 150 200 250 300 - 3 40
50 1 100
0

2 ban
kfull ,; +:•..
-20
-30 _ _edge of water _ . : edge of wat '... __ ` * .:. ,.
-40
-50 ._.... .. _.. ,_.. _. _.. .,..._ _ .........,_? wa
-80 ._ ------ _?_ .?.__.... _ _ _ ._'_.

WIDTH (IM
to STA 2

0 -
p of bank
z
_t0 ._1oo _ 200 Sao aoo_. soo hypo. '1 0 LEGEND Z
i
20 0 t
_
-30

an an
ul L4
a'
-? EXISTING STREAM O
a0
E
-50 edge otwater PROPOSED STREAM z f
/J U
-80 - O
A
70 U O
80
WIDTH (IN)
a
0
O F
in

0 STA 3

-10 50 100 150 _ 200. 250 300 3, 50 En
top of bank
-2t1 O
O E
,.-30 P4 U
bankfull '
bankful _.?---? U pq
.40 ....
rL .50 WA
Owrl ..VA
G
60 tr
edge of water
Pmlm
.70
bank fa(lure
A
-80
g0
-
%mm (Iw SHEET
3
a4

Project Name
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
Project Owner:
Haywood Vocational Op7portunities
Post Office Box
Hazelwood, NC 28738
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
CONTACT: David Probst
Designer & Agent:
I
APPALACHIAN
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
367 SCOTTS CREEK RD
SYLVA, NC 28779
828.586.1973
828.631.0343 (fax)
www.appalachianenvironment.com
CONTACT: Mickey B. Henson
`.i`.. 975 ;`? ° _....
?,..,
......... ;b ..........?,
Plan Sheet Index
1 - EXISTING SITE
2 - PROPOSED STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
3 - CROSS SECTIONS
4 - DETAILS
Proiect Description:
Browning Branch, a perennial stream running through property owned by Haywood
Vocational Opportunities (HVO) in Haywood County, North Carolina has experienced stream
damage during the past year from Hurricanes Francis and Ivan. The extent of this damage
between the conspan at Scates Street and conspan 640 feet downstream consists of eroded
streambanks, woody debris and household trash deposits. There is also an infestation of
invasive species including multiflora rose growing along this reach of stream. HVO is
concerned that continued erosion and bank migration will threaten their existing building on
the west side of Browning Branch and be a hazard for employees of HVO with disabilities.
The project will consist of removing deposited debris and trash, removing invasive
species, stabalizing the streambanks, revegetating the site with native species and installing
rock veins as needed along this reach of Browning Branch. Existing overstory species
including black willow, black walnut, locust and red maple will not be disturbed. Sheet 2 of
this plan gives details of work to take place along this reach of stream.
April 11, 2005
Rebecca Newton
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Dear Ms. Newton,
I am authorizing Mickey B. Henson of Appalachian Environmental Services to act as my
agent for the Browning Branch Stream Stabilization Project at the Haywood Vocational
Opportunities (HVO) Facility in Haywood County, North Carolina.
Sincerely, I n
David Probst
Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO)
PO Box 3007
Hazelwood, NC 28738
Re: 04-0462 Haywood Vocational Opps - Haywood County - NOV?
Subject: Re: 04-0462 Haywood Vocational Opps - Haywood County - NOV?
From: Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:13:01 -0400
To: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
Has received an NOV.
Has not responded.
Projection hold until we get new plans to fix the violation as well as perform the
stabilization as requested.
--Kevin
Ian McMillan wrote:
Kevin, what is the status of this file, 04-0462 Haywood Vocational Opps - Haywood
County? I've got more info received 5/23 in the folder, but when we
teleconferenced with Cyndi I wrote down that this was a problem site and either
had or would be receiving an NOV. I've got a statutory date of 7/21. Thanks, Ian
Kevin Barnett - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Kevin Barnett <[e-mail]>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
1 of 1 7/13/2005 11:13 AM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Kevin Barnett
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Borger Edwards
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc. Expansion County Haywood
Project Number 04 0462 County2
Recvd From APP < Region Asheville
Received Date 3/25/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type 'connection between existing facilities and proposed
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland' Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
9W14 Stream PT_ N F_ 5-16-8 F-c _F_TP 40,305. F_- 40.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352832 Longitude (ddmmss) 830015
Comments:
On Hold - KHB - ARO - 05/10/2005 Add Info Sent
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
A TF =? -6- "J'0-
C
APPALACHIAN F.NVIRONME.NTAL 5E.RVICE.5
LAND & WATER -- DESIGN & BUILD
"The art in restoration is in the application. "@
May 18, 2005
Ms. Cindy Karoly
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: DWQ Project # 04-462
Haywood Vocational Opportunities
Haywood County, NC
Dear Ms. Karoly,
P&ROWR 0
MAY 2 3 200.5
WERMOSAND TMNAT RI BBRRANM
This letter is in reply to your letter dated May 10, 2005 regarding additional information for the
stream stabilization project at the Haywood Vocational Opportunities in Haywood County, NC.
1. Impact 3ustification
The project is a streambank stabilization project. The design will no longer include
stream relocation. Enclosed, Please find a stabilization plan reflecting these changes.
2. Stormwater
Our project is not related to the adjacent project (downstream), so stormwater should
not be a concern. However, the stormwater plan for the new construction was approved
by the Town of Waynesville through their Planning Board and Public Works Departments
using the Town's Land Development Standards. If you need to verify this you may
contact Mr. John Swift, Waynesville Town Planner, at 828-452-0401.
3. Sewage Disposal
Our project is not related to the project downstream. And the existing building has been
on the Town of Waynesville sewer system for over 30 years. However, the sewage plan
for the new construction was approved by the Town of Waynesville through their
Planning Board and Public Works Departments using the Town's Land Development
Standards. If you need to verify this you may contact Mr. John Swift, Waynesville Town
Planner, at 828-452-0401.
367 Scotts Creek Road, Sylva, NC 28779
828.586.1973 Phone [phone] Fax
mickey.henson@appalachianenvironmentcom
www.appalachianenvironmentcom
jylva, NC = Lake Glenv lle, NC = Long Creek 5C
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 828-586-1973 Ext. 302 or by
mobile at 828-342-3269.
Sincerely,
Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, CE, RF
Vice President
Cc: Kevin Barnett, DWQ Asheville Regional Office
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Dave McHenry, NCWRC
Message
Page 1 of 1
Mickey B. Henson
From: Jeff Hatling [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:51 AM
To: " Mickey B. Henson
Cc: Bradford Deaton (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Questions?
We have a golf course development being proposed that the developer is considering stream mitigation. I
met with you firm several years ago and you had done a nice golf course project. Brad Deaton the project
manager is cc on this e-mail and would be the contact person for the project. The project is called Caleb's
Creek.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mickey B. Henson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 3:28 PM
To: [e-mail].
Cc: Rebecca Henson
Subject: Questions?
Mr. Hatling,
How may we be of assistance to you?
Mickey Henson
Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, CE, RF
Vice President
828.586.1973 Ext. 302
828.631.0343 (FaA)
828.342.3269 (Mobile)
Corporate: 367 Scotts Creek Road, Sylva, NC 28779
Lake Glenville: 59 Smoky Ridge Road, Glenville, NC 28736
Long Creek: Damascus Church Road, Long Creek, SC 29658
APPALAcH AN ENVIRONMENTAL 5ERVICE.5
Land & Water _- Design & Build
"The art in restoration is in the application.
5.91,,a, NC # Lake Glenville, NC ^' Long Creek, 5C
5/19/2005
r _
APPALACHIAN
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
367 SCOTTS CREEK ROAD
SYLVA, NC 28119
828.586.1973
FAX: [phone]
WWW.APPALACHIANENVIRONMENT.COM
D ???a V
MA
Y Z 3 2005
MR
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
STORM WATER WETLAND
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
1 -EXISTING SITE
Z -PROPOSED STREAM STABALIZATION
3 -CROSS SECTIONS
4 -DETAILS

f
VAN All

2726
?N -
\ \ \, ", \ tip I ? , ? / \
.?
I _

2721

\ R
, ?
\ \
_ \ \
\ w
I
?` `
\\
2729`0!
NATION 2128 I
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELE / \ \
I

%
ti
I

BUILMNG\
S
OPPORTUNITIE
OCATIONAL
\
1 1
EXISTING HAYVr ,OOD V
\
,
FU s 1
2732.0 I \;
R FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION
100 YEA
\ ? 4

" LEGEND
W E
EXISTING STREAM
s
Too_ TEMP DIVERSION DITCH
20 10 0 20 40 60 •• v SILT FENCE
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 20 FEET
?2 L OPPORTUNITIES
o = u a
??? EXISTING HAYWOOD VOCATIONA
D

sx
SITE STREAMBANK STABALIZATION

HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC 9L F P
?_-

\ V A ?\ \ •? ?\ ?'
\ \\ ?\ \ ?r--
A'?
726 o
2729.0'x.4 ? \ ?
AR FLOOD PLA1N ELEVATION •? ? ?` `, \\ ??? .•. ? ,-
' \ ? v V 1\ ?. ? X29 ? \
\ 1 \1 i
oo
\ 'J
ES 8UILDING\ I
VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNIT' \ \ 1
STING HAYNOOD
eras
IN ELEVATION = 2732.0 \ \ ? ?
pp YEAR FLOOD PLAIN era ,

\

t

N
W VI% E s
20 10 0 20 40 60
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 20 FEET
1\

LEGEND
Y
4?I

J
ii
11,
l?
i
-- .1 1
i

a
i

EXISTING STREAM
SILT FENCE
ROCK VEIN
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
o = PROPOSED
SITE STREAMBANK STABALIZATION# 4L°?D
m
HAY`YOOD COUNTY, NC • ...."mg

STA 1
10
0
10 10 20 20 30 3j? ?,oo 400
-10
z 20
u?i -30
0
-40
-50
-60
WIDTH (III
STA 2
1D
0
-10 10 20 30 40 50 700
i
F-20--
-30 W -40
f7- I
-50
-60
-70
-80
WIDTH (IN)
STA 3
0
-10 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 300 350
-20
- -30
z
x?
W 50
G -60
-70
-80
-90
WD3TH (IN
LEGEND
- D EXISTING STREAM
PROPOSED STREAM
APPGLACHIPN
EN`JIPCNNENT6l SEP'IKES
eu ezarrsu e. aw
ena ? mm
ue eu ion
ru uewaxe

G7
W
E-
zz
::) O
E- E U
oNz
P.
O ?
z
?E-4x
Z U
O x
A
d d O
U Gq
9 d
aax
x
En
Ln O
O'''
W E-
UU
W
U ID PARTY: N/A
DRAWN SY*. N/A
DO& DATE. 7/n/05
TODAY'S DATE: 7/1/63
SHEET
3
OF 4

•"? E 0
IAAIIFgxA.w IUX,INYI
I.w"FP?I+A.wM,a.Faro+
1 ereFAr1+A FI?Aw41 rw+IFFLUx
.,x wro?w GG
1 -1 1 A.
IM. AMGR/u1r 10FF M
I7«F rFpwaiwuwr FF UFa,OAi
+4 eEF I+F?,wUxr
m xo IFF??.wwl IwwlFluxrFOwr«
I
0
0
`i E?wro xaaorxc+avFw.+oa...+w.oweamFwEmrvuu«or«vEmr.?uxnaw.ax...um,orecrae+o+a
1 IULMEIIwF ViwwIJMRr M Ilflw FK F!eGwxSE.
t IUxMwroLL GTVw,M9wA+F RWMMarOaFx,gF.
A ??M IGttw W m Nx?A0MGa0N Ipl WEfu? IU6 eFFtlwO A„KK{+Axwe 41f wLrAAR N+Y IXRApx TEx
+ crow nE xuF r iwFmroxcFaoeFwu rw Iuwa, rrorurr.u u.weu«roawxa?M,almrartxwNrrtxrux
L IF RAF IUMxq Y.OrLL p08F0axVrtY
1 A+rn'w Or rou A 9R?FF Orxa x?r nEF FEE1xp9 E+4we4ERC+wwir+.E0.
w vFOMRwcrelFCFdwr+E+awlwuhwmEE
1 ?r?w rFC«AOU wuwr+F wEaroAaxr+ncauorwES?
ice. f Ae `A `i i `
fwa? a f ? f
s ?A-
r
Ae
?_ s f f
s o
s f `a`
i ? f Af A..
7RAaaAG' Mm ANa'MD' uP s a ` ?A.+. ?, r ...
AAV DOW 7Ar.aa9T
ORCOU DAT Wu 104=4 5=
AAWIA L AO AMAX RLWT. \ ??. °++• i`
TRACKING
AYSrNOLD srxuarwNr
[A1577A; seas-?
APPROVED BARE ROOT SEEDLING SPECIES
Redbud (Cerciscanadensis)
River birch(Betula nigra)
Cherry birCF(Betula lenta)
Red oak(Quercusrubra)
White a a k (Quercus alba)
Sycamore (Platanus 0a identalis)
Yellow poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera)
?. r 0
0
,?:A.?.wlxEx,?Froa?F.,?.ax>u
Aaa axorF Fxrr+r.1 war.
0 0
ear GAL15 m 1.1.I prq
SFr P4V W SOA=4r
fW A9AA!I?4N PAN7AC
or I42GDAX4S SF[ZLES
i@CA,aAC Sll8dA16LYCS IV A SGBF,IIaC PAIN: RTSDA DN CWa W7DWS
AIZ= TIP =Z4#WW PMT e+"WWN AW 5=24 f6CNL,N7 AC OZI6L1F'I,C
AANWa-RJ /F P4A7 SFC=
APPMPMQNS AND EffECLUN£SS
ACST S=IW U ON SMCA,MAS MLAE ACFAA,7F V=W AND OWNa UaUa2N
AW AN7A7MTM
WNLWLS I7a%tuxw 01 ANTAC SY71S
EAIM M CL AAJ C arn/ OALN ANOIFL ~7X6 MOW ROM N7LCI76
Cr= 7Ar mfD 644W ALWr AW AWNAi Lr P NM AAC WCW V=W =AW
amew IASD PL#S
SnfA1B/M' SX ANWbl AO A W&" 6112w 1 CW? 1LLC11WAX AAO eFAR'
L440AC CCAarad AW fACmRS ADP CF7Fb&" PC A AR IX SLar CapaD16:
SMDM AKSE' TEL.S
BANK SHAPING AND PLANTING
r
r
+ *? r APPALACHIAN
ENVIP'NMENTGL SEaJKES
\ iH Hi FCOrn uE, wxi
mve, c enE
u eeA iwF
Fu ueuaxe
ANCHOR TRENCH RATINAL OP AWD FWINEL
#
#bFC
Ar x-3
/ If, r ?
/ e 5-1G-05
IQX SWT AT (7.") SF'MWS
SQL'ElRA: VYW
r r
? r enM.?
rr H
E-
CFWNNEL ANCHOR TRENCH INTERAAITTENT CHECK SLOT z z
W1IS 4 ad= -qS m rr IXM7RLCM PR A#AU7X7LsUXS mfXARYS
A LIO4 Of SZ4%M LAnW PI ARNS.,CTUMM sarsrAW4 a F, U
COIR MATS - CHANNEL INSTALLATION a z
as
o?
z
E
z
ox
0 A
r rz+° cr avW O
,roar NEM U 0
O E.,
O
Reehape s2,wmb3mk pro's wi?t 1
carmas,replantnparianzcoe.
A A#-n<0 OF LOCA7p4 P7ar VLN:S
L.ft -M 'A' at ma INueredai of as rbr
w au 1.11 «oeq eoN Loam pwN re' Ly
se.:gcaD o.woC
mr hp d .W W. A: V"' eW C' Axdd nca
V.f ACfCrpY km attar tM 7GA of Wo 'A pa gAj
wd wii 'C: RIX7( KN ? OFF
PLAN VIEW W
,? FY aW A
ram
_FIELD PARIr: N/A
DRAIM ar: N/A
0.5E STAFNE flOr *CgX S7Cfta WPAL DATE: ]/17M05a
/y
tDOWS EW E. 3/? w
PATNNAr L/-/Ml

'?DJ LAT -AVC'K'PNSP CROSS SECTION
LNm snWAMRW
ROCK VEIN
SHEET
4
OF 4
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Barnett. Kevin
Roger Fdwards,
Facility Name Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc. Expansion County Haywood
Project Number 04 0462 County2
Recvd From APP Region Asheville
Received Date 3/25/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type 'connection' between` existing facilities and proposed
Certificates Stream
Class
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream' Acres Feet
Type ' Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
NW14 Stream O Y OO N 5-16-8 F c- TR 40,305. F- 40.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
i
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? p Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/Coed O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 352832 Longitude (ddmmss) 830015
Comments:
On Hold - KHB - ARO - 05/10/2005 Add Info Sent
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date: 5/2/05 Project Name: Haywood Vocational Opportunities
DWQ#: 04-0462
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office County: Haywood
To: 60-day Processing Time: 4/29/05 to 6/27/05
01'J w
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
Stream length impacted
Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
0 Minimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
n Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
APPALACHIAN F-NVIRONMF-NTAL 5F-RVICE5
LAND & WATER ;u DESIGN & BUILD
April 20, 2005
Rebecca Newton
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
6J r
d n " SRI
Re: Browning Branch Streambank Stabilization
Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO), Inc.
Haywood County, NC
i I
Dear Ms. Newton,

-3:3 @,J971gZD
APR 2 9 2005
C?!lR 4 i i 0: (_JAL1-1 Y
WETLni ,SN DSTCr?.;r;tTER6t'v1'IM
We are requesting permission to stabilize 300 feet of streambank on both sides of Browning
Branch at the Haywood Vocational Opportunities Facilities in Hazelwood, NC. If you have any
,questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 828-586-1973 Ext. 302 or by mobile at 828-342-
3269. Thank you again for all of your assistance.
Sincerely,
Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, CE, RF
Vice President
Enc: Agent Authorization Letter
PCN Form
Streambank Stabilization Plan
Cc: John Dorney, NCDWQ Wetlands Section (7 Copies and Review Fee)
Kevin Barnett, NCDWQ Asheville Regional Office (1 Copy)
Dave McHenry, NCWRC (1 Copy)
Marc Pruett, Haywood County Erosion Control Officer (1 Copy)
367 Scotts Creek Road, Sylva, NC 28779
828.586.1973 Phone [phone] Fax
mi&,ey.henson@appalachianenvironmentcom
vrww.appalachianenvironmentcom
S91-, NC = Lake Glenville, NC =Long Creek SC
April 11, 2005
Rebecca Newton
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
'Dear Ms. Newton,
I am authorizing Mickey B. Henson of Appalachian Environmental Services to act as my
agent for the Browning Branch Stream Stabilization Project at the Haywood Vocational
Opportunities (HVO) Facility in Haywood County, North Carolina.
Sincerely,
David Probst
Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO)
PO Box 3007
Hazelwood, NC 28738
APR 2 200,5
Office Use Only: F, Form Version April 2001
1}E IR -
V,ERNZ8k"'
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any'particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. , Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
IL Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Haywood Vocational Opportunities (HVO Inc. (David Probst)
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 7, Hazelwood, NC 28738
Telephone Number:[phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mickey B. Henson, Ph.D., PWS, RF
Company Affiliation: Appalachian Environmental Services
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 52, Webster, NC 28788
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mickev.hensongappalachianenvironment.com
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Browning Branch Streambank Stabilization Project
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 8605-81-0728
4. Location
County:HgMood Nearest Town: Hazelwood
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Please see attached MapQuest
directions.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):_ N35° 28.492' W 83° 0.229' (WGS84)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Haywood Vocational Opportunities is a private not-for-profit corporation providing
vocational training and employment to adults with disadvantages and disabilities
7. Property size (acres): Approximately 5.11 Acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Browning Branch
9. River Basin: French Broad
Page 2 of 9
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To stabilize the stream banks and reve etate
bare riparian areas.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Excavator, Loader, Dump
Truck
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Training Facilfty
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 3 of 9
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***

I

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hup://www.fema.gov.
*** List', a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
Plan Stabilization 300 Browning Branch 301f Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coni,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Page 4 of 9
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 3001f
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres)
(if Name p Waterbody
applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

List eacn impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
i Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The purpose of this project is to enhance and improve the environment
Page 5 of 9
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httl2://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlaiids/stn-ngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 6 of 9
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/Nvrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 7 of 9
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
,(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
,Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes El No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Gone t extends out :iU teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9

Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Speciesccessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
M,dJD"
AppticantrA"gent's ignature Date
(Agent's signature 's valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Driving Directions from Swannanoa, NC to 56 Scates St, Waynesvill... http://www.mapquest.com/directions/main.adp?do=prt&mapdata=b...
w.w "? ? 1 F_ e y r
78 % cash backs - Cif1
8 Send To Printer Back To Directions purchases at pernarkets,
Start: Swannanoa, NC drugstores and
us gas stations' ":.
End: 56 Scates St J.?J/0 cash backt
Waynesville, NC everywhere else a
28786-1976 US _
Distance: 40.42 miles O %J/O APR*
on balance
transf are for
Total Estimated Time: 46 minutes 12 months
Directions Distance
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
1. Start out going EAST toward ASHEVILLE RD (Portions unpaved). <0.1 miles
..j..:.? ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
,` / 2. Turn LEFT onto ASHEVILLE RD. 0.2 miles
. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
3. Turn LEFT onto US-70/BLACK MOUNTAIN HWY. <0.1 miles
........,,,./... ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
? 4. Turn LEFT onto PATTON COVE RD. 0.3 miles
.... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Merge onto 1-40 W. 31.0 miles
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
csr Merge onto US-74 W via EXIT 27 toward
' 6. CLYDE/WAYNESVILLE/MURPHY/ATLANTA/MAGGIE VALLEY. 1.3 miles
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
WEST Merge onto US-74 W/US-23 S/GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS EXPY via the exit
74 7' on the LEFT. 6.1 miles
:.......................................... ............................. ....................... ...............................................................................................
8. Take EXIT 100 toward HAZELWOOD. 0.1 miles
? ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
9. Turn LEFT onto EAGLES NEST RD. 0.4 miles
4... ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
V 10. EAGLES NEST RD becomes HAZELWOOD AVE/PLOTT CREEK RD/E MAIN ST. 0.1 miles
....;;;/... ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
<?> 11. Turn RIGHT onto RIVERBEND ST. 0.2 miles
.... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
<? > 12. Turn RIGHT onto SCATES ST. <0.1 miles
............ ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
13. End at 56 Scates St, Waynesville, NC 28786-1976 US
F1lgPp T., : . G, b p Smi
25t ;' Weuvemlle y km
o htltanLawsi rctymusFr? CAW*
63 F Ml sr ks Lodgo, ,j Ylalk.rtown
?Gataloochr• >saMlurrt:r k r ElkMounwn - t
RiVo? ltti ?n ? aso ?' ? ?: ?aodfln? ?, o lcsv?li~ ?` Montr.ae
raburss Emma eviUe .,.:
1170 +4}iJ
?Jonatlran Ira?'btrtt ?°` ? H?sri Qrssis .? ? ?. ? r b .1.. ? $
? itCr sk p:irkwayForsst.
0
Ashrs Grwk
27 Tplks r Cartdr ) ???
+rr.. ,---?1 akv _kmnt.nltn? / •? s'
1 of2 4/19/2005 3:13 PM
Driving Directions from Swannanoa, NC to 56 Scates St, Waynesvill...

HazehveyieRIO P, j
o13?TsJint - ? `?,
o ulnland :Sunburst ?Cnuso
0um?tt Slding? ?., _
02005 MapQuestwrn, Inc.; 0,2005 GDT,Inc.
Start:
Swannanoa, NC
US'
300m
00ft?.
m V L-7
B U? z O i7P?
?° ?PEE sf ortst
o 6°
? annanoa'
http://www.mapquest.com/directions/Main.adp?do=prt&mapdata=b...
Mtxkt#ain
End:
56 Scates St
Waynesville, NC
28786-1976 US
s' ' Y3srto'n.,
Baarwaliow
Maxwell MRI

Carolina Ph,
gQpt;
E Main` St t m

4? ?c5 'jam 3 t .

23
l Aa?
?
-

? ?
,
R
r
-
a p?»n
, ??
q ?
? _ _ > _ le
C 2005 MiapQuestcum, Inc. 02005 NAVTEQ
?
02046 @+M"tarktcam"W 02005 G
DT. Inc.
NAVTEO
Notes:
............................................................
........................................................
All rights reserved. Use Subiect to
............................................................ ........................................................ License/Copyright

" """' "" These directions are informational only. No
' '
'"""""""' representation is made or warranty given as
. .............................................
to their content, road conditions or route
usability or expeditiousness. User assumes
............................................................ ........................................................ all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers
assume no responsibility for any loss or
......! ..................................................... ........................................................ delay resulting from such use.
2 of 2
4/19/2005 3:13 PM
....................................
L
APPALACHIAN
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
367 SCOTTS CREEK ROAD
SYLVA, NC 28779
828.586.1973
FAX: [phone]
WWW.APPALACHIANENVIRONHENT.COH
HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
STORMWATER WETLAND
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC
1 -EXISTING SITE
2 -PROPOSED STREAM STABALIZATION
3 -CROSS SECTIONS
4 -DETAILS
WETLAND
46
SEAL
1396
o.
x 975 x:
:off:
FYB.?
r: 7
APR 2 ?i 2005
DENR • vvyl;:', (QUALITY
1'icilAtti03h`,'DS "i LrjtEjjrj;;,H
cA 0A4 6 2

A
? ? ?

&N AN I
VA `' I I? pp 1 I V
'-
-A

I
1 \
sow
woo
woo
\ \ \\'\
I
I

ATlo2726.0 \ \ \
=
t?

OOD PLAIN ELEVATION = 2729' ?? ? \?\ \\ \?\ ? I-- V28

100 YEAR FL , \ \\ \ pp ,
;I
/I

ETA a / I I ply ...
\
I I
1
Tl '
\ t
\
0 ?1
2732.
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION
\
7A I v

N
W E
LEGEND

S EXISTING STREAM
- -TDD- - - TEMP DI VERSION DITCH
20 10 0 20 40 60 . SILT FENCE
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 20 FEET

a
'
?
AL OPPORT
UNITI
ES Y o
m q
? EXISTING HAYWOOD VOCATION
STREAMBANK STABALIZATI ON Sz? ?D
SITE I n
?& NC
HAYWOOD COUNTY Q mg
,

\ 1V,
X26.0 1 \ \ • ? _
\ \ \ \ ?' . t_..
ELEVATION 2
AR FLOOD PLAIN ?
i
i
i 1 \
\
00 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION = 2732.0
IV
W
S
E
i
i
i
i
z
i
20 10 0 20 40 60
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 20 FEET
LEGEND

EXISTING STREAM
PROPOSED STREAM
a SILT FENCE
ROCK VEIN
PROPOSED HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES d=?
N m 1STREAM STREAMBANK STABALIZATIONp_
STABALIZATIONg
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NC

10 STA 1
0
10 10 20 20 30 3 40
-10
z
-20
x
w -30
D
-40-
-60-
WIDTH (IN
10 STA 2
0
10 10 20 30 40 50 700
Z -20
-30
w -40
-50
-60
-70
-ea
WIDTH (IM
STA 3
0
-10 100 1 0 2 0 250 0 350
-20
-30
z
x ?
w -50
60
-70
-80
-90
WDTH(Ih?
LEGEND
---p EXISTING STREAM
PROPOSED STREAM
APPALACHIAN
ENVIPONMENTAL SEW)ICES
.. swimdeMaxi
3 sem
ue sown
i4 bUU]
U)
W
H
F
1-1
zz
?o
Em-4 `
oNz
w
C)
E-+
zoo
C
?zo
!t C)
O
Aix
O?
e4
x
U1
z
O
OF
aU
UW
F= PARTY: N/A
OP/NN ID'. N/A
MT'AL DATE: 1/27/05
TOM% CATS; 3/1/M
SHEET
3
OF 4
0 Eli,
?, 0 ,`, 0 l 0
i
I4f1.,d.,.?wxxpaE,a?
E.xd M I.,?a?,d EEabr,aa?f.d?,
?bm.arw.p.LL M4fropEE p.a
b ? F-ft°al ?Efrp.Kan4.aME?,a
0?u0Pow%p;xp/E I?p
i EE`rwnflroucEruw®.mwr?E.envlnowta..r.\
1 1 \
0 © 0
o ? o 0
?M MFdpIPpl M4eGp WVlfrop,IxaAM VRrtl fUllEN,NVfMVELY iMIp plExE.¢RHd Id,.11VHq
! wne uca?rew luamrEUmona poawuc
1 fm»xne l.ce wmmxpnv. inpEl mavfrorou
EpwEMYnR a 0.d.5E„4r rua lEaM Nx4tfx,fplrt EARUaNUfVmr(Va.Mx
1 anE.wF xaEnf.EnEp wEppE4E*?IEEUxanENwiwa.wnexrooawwrrtw4fmno,>ENV?nans?
l If XAE rNNW 610,n¢pFD[MFmV.
l'IKEFCN.]1EVa11a, ElHpfp?WrrtuFNdp•Y15MMFeLLEE1fCiFLYCK,Y1Hi
a a ...
a .?- f air- ?? a
a "? a i a
r ass a .a s
i a a a f
_a
a
a a ..fE.
o fs `a
a a f fa?1E.
7MCK AY tta71 A140WWM li i am as f aai
AW DOW PC MCWCa
TRACKING

APPROVED BARE ROOT SEEDLING SPECIES
Planting Palette bare hoot Tree Jeealings
Redbud (Cerciscanadensis)
River birch(Betula nigra)
Cherry bircF(Betula lenta)
Red ook(Quercusrubra)
White oak (Quercus alba)
Sycamore (Platanus ooadentalis)
Yellow poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera)
SOAK D%MCS M I.tI (am)
SEI gM?7fC SWED&W
fm IFiNtBtA! PrA MG
OF IAAGDItY,S SPSCZS
AfWb"G SZWAA6M M A STMC SLOE RACAM 10MC aA C2MW AWDOWS
AEm AAF SCSTi'1AG PLW OWEN AW MMTAG AtSZy AID ASTAdC6
A FVkVV% r ASAYr SAC=
A PMAiKN'S AAD EFfFCTiYF7 Sys
ACSr SU'ft WU CM SAdEY®Wa NOW ACCOK7 M=W AYl "W4M AIa%l
1W AWA'/MtA
AVOW= C>Yalctm+ a ANAL srtna
A= N CAWAAA W MW Mot {M77L91c PR CXM WKW now W0=Es
Ln= PC TCLZUACF AWCC fW AAL CXWS,"MVWDMS =LM
lYIAr Atsr RC•S
SAACYBIW =9 40=5" AW AM aWX SgaW WLMF ALUCAMnC AAC BWI'
LOA CCAal Arc AaC7A tDP ar• "AgWM" SAar COAMM
6E1AF AASr Rdli
SLAW AW)W At£ AC=MMM
BANK SHAPING AND PLANING
it
'
YAY/l
ANCHOR TRENCH AllN P AND_CFANN£L
• 7.
y•
V •
•
r
N
r
r -rdl
1C19= Slat AT h' (7.6gJ NR>AKS
r r
? r rrAOw
CFWNNEL ANCHOR TRENCH INTERUITIENT CHECK SLOT
ACSCS? A 0MX S= W AF COW== AM MAUACAMEW SFt!1>fXAIn16
a sz"Mc Al SZKM "MW AGF AAAMMAM SHETAC nQAM
COIR MATS - CHANNEL INSTALLATION
Ala CF ®WC
Reshape SYWMba kProle]*Tn
cdrm2?;, rep'antdparenane.
A &-7WO CA- L"71; PCOC VEWS
C.ro4 nil %' a Y. h1E11r: al Ar Ib?.
it W NA IIz Dank CccouA,npz - by
dfsl/q !n1 C A'?V A. An AM W vaN
0. t of nh A. KN V i Axabd 1W1
&.t A k hM Aa 1M! 'C' Y bcdd M
and f i! CW oavw ft Op d rh 'A'
PLAN VIEW
STMW FLOW
L
-R= tOV
N
•. 1 1 S
1
WY
aYat l?G???
AA>7( H71
Ay<
AKA21' SMIAD
?C11AIClEt' (af?6
m?
,.,Wj LA Y-AnJ'`tvMV CROSS SECAON
MV S7AfAIHD
ROCK VEIN
MMW?
APPALACHIAN
ENVIPONMENTAL SEPACES
IttV4 K E>A
N f11 ro)!
f4 YIUm.!
W
?O
?E-4?
oNz
w
O
H
zoo
?zo
O
O N
O cn
•1u?,
1'1
U)
a
??i
CC.
-'
W
A
MID PARM N/A
MAAM Or. W/A
WAI CAM 2/17/03
T00AYS CATE' A/
SHEET
4
OF 4
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 30, 2004
Haywood County
DWQ Project #: 04-0462
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
Post Office Box 3007
Hazelwood, NC 28738
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact 40 feet of perennial
stream for the purpose of providing connection between existing facility and the proposed facility as
you described in your application dated March 3, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404, which may be
viewed on our website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 14 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a
new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and
approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for
this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding
Nationwide Permit expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to
be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
Conditions of Certification:
Certification of Completion
1. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return
the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands
Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc.
March 30, 2004
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result
in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above
conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786 or Kevin Barnett at our
Asheville Regional Office at 828-251-6208.
Sincerely,
W. Kli ek, P. , irector
JRD/bs
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Asheville DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Patrick Bradshaw, Bradshaw Engineering, Post Office Box 1011, Waynesville, NC 28786
Bradshaw
-ff-
Engineering
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING
P.O Box 1011 - Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.bradshawengineering.com
To: Division of Water Quality
401JWetlands Unit 4u 4 6
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650
RE:
Submittal for HVO Proposed Expansion
Creek Crossing over Browning Branch
Waynesville, NC
From: Patrick Bradshaw, PE
P99 -
D
Date: March 19, 2004
Enclosed please find seven copies of the USCOE Pre-Construction Notification Form for the
project noted above. Also included is a check in the amount of $200.00.
If you need additional information regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 828-452-4410.
MAR 2 5 2004
i

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
L i Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
IL Applicant Information `=gyp F ' J J?
1. Owner/Applicant Information MAR 2 5 2004
Name: Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc
Mailing Address: PO Box 3007
Hazelwood, NC 28738
Telephone Number. -828-456-4455 Fax Number. 828-456-8639
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Patrick Bradshaw PE
Company Affiliation: Bradshaw Engineering, Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 1011
Waynesville. NC 28786
Telephone Number: 828-4524410 Fax Number: 828-456-5455
E-mail Address: patrick@bradshawen ig neering.com
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc. - Pro,g m Expansion
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 8605-82-2326
4. Location
County: Haywood Nearest Town: Waynesville
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
I-40 to exit 27, Proceed west towards Waynesville on US 23/74 to the Hazelwood exit (Exit
9100) At the bottom of the exit ramp turn left onto Eagles Nest Road, go thru 1 stop light
and at the next stop sign take a left onto Hazelwood Avenue proceed 200 yards, cross the
railroad tracks and take the first right on Riverbend Street The site is the large field area on
the right as you Q oceed on Riverbend St
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Lat 35° 28' 32" N Long 83° 00' 15" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 6.005 acres
7. Nearest body of water (streanVriver/sound/ocean/lake): Browning Branch
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr,state.nc.us/admin/maps1/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The existing, site is a large grass lawn area that has been
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of constructing a new production and warehouse space for HVO which
currents occupies a space on the north side of Browning Branch The existing facility will
remain in operation in addition to the new facility. The need for the proposed creek crossing
is to give some element of connectivitVto both the existing and proposed facility particularly
for material transfer, storage etc The work will be performed using traditional earthwork
gquipment, primarily consisting of a track-hoe, bull dozer and dump trucks
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to provide a
connection between HVO's existing facility and the proposed facility (see site plan)
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The proposed development will occupy the entire tract of property no future development is
planned for this property
VL Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts include
the installation of 40 LF of twin arch (bottomless culverts that will be situated on it common
concrete foundation in the middle of the creek and be situated on separate footings on their
respective sides of the creek beyond the normal water surface of the creek _
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100 year Floodplain**
eslno) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A

:m -te Tm rta inrbvie hilt are not limited try me chani7Ed clearing. grading. fill,
a.,aaa a.aa.u auatnava w?.a.awa.y ...a.. a...w•...J ......_...'... J ••••2••---•• ?•?•?- -__?a _ __ __ _ __
excavation, flooding, ditching) ainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both strucUrre and flooding.
ss 100-Year floodplams are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's QTMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httpJ/wxvxv.fema.gov.
sss List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., &cshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease specify)
1 Culvert 40 Browning Branch 12" Perennial

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not )trotted to: culverts and associated np-rap:
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditchingl&aightemng, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
• • Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the neatest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
w«1v.usgs.QOV. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., tti%vxv.topozone.com,
w%vw.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 40 LF
Page 8 of 12
A Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbury
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary ' sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

• List' each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts mchrde, but are not limited to: uL4 excavauwy cuwgwg,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed crossing has been situated at a location so as to cross the creek in a perpendicular
fashion Based on the flood study and no-rise analysis performed for the only viable alternative
is the twin arch culverts (bottomless) as designed Other alternatives became cost prohibitive
due to the required opening associated with the flood study.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to, perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmaide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
s Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
XL Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Due to the Superfund efforts, the existing site has no impervious acreage„ The proposed site
shall have 4.25 impervious acres. This stormwater will be treated in accordance with the Town
of Waynesville standards which are a mirror of the Phase H rules outlined by NCDWQ
f
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All sewage disposal will be discharged into the Town of Waynesville municipal sewer collection
'system
XHL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Appli t/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
no.,ms(D SL'1E
f'"1
CopftM (0)1997. Mapfech, Inc.
ZEXIST.
`
BUILDING
1
1
UPSTREAM INVERT
(BOTH CULVERTS)
= 2722.10 --t
i
BR0WN14G BENCH

II \\
ZFUTURE PAVEMENT,
TYPICAL --\

ZFUTURE PAVEMENT,
TYPICAL7

PREPARED BY: DRAWING SCALE: SHEET TITLE CLIENT: SHEETS

M V = 20'
(?
IS TWONEWY DRAM HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL 1
E JEJ CREEK PLAN OPPORTUNITIES
ngineering PROJECT DATE: HEADQUARTERS OF
CIVIL ENGINEERING ¦ LAND PLANNING MARCH 2004

P.O. BOX 1011, Waynesville, North Carolina 237W
Telephone: [phone], FAX: (828) 45&5455
www.bradshawengineering.com FILE NAME:

CORPS-A01 2

DOWNSTREAM INVERT
(BOTH CULVERTS)
= 2721.10
40 LF OF CORRUGATED
METAL BOX CULVERTS
(2 TOTAL) 12'x3" SPAN x
7'-3" RISE, EACH CULVERT
rr'rr
ma _ EXI ST I N G CREEK *o
r
ONE WIDTH VARIES 10'TO20' '
r
EXISTING GRADE • '
? J
%`%--_----_
EXISTING CREED SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED FILL
MATERIAL-
PROPOSEDGRADE
40 LF OF CORRUGATED
METAL BOX CULVERTS
(2 TOTAL) 12'x3" SPAN x
T-3" RISE, EACH CULVERT
l
Y Y
PROPOSED HEADWALL
AND FOOTINGS BY OTHERS
PROPOSED CREED SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
EXHIBIT - DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PREPARED BY: DRAWIN03CALE: SHEET TITLE: CLIENT: SHEETS
N/A
t y n. J ul
E o E HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES
ngineering CREEK SECTION
CIVIL ENGINEERING m LAND PLANNING PROJECT SATE
MARCH 2004 HEADQUARTERS OF
P.O. BOX 1011, Waynesville, North Carolina 28788
Telephone: [phone], FAX: [phone]
FILE NAME:
G
www.bradshawenginearing.com CORPS-A01 .,