490014_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Type of Visit: 9 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other • 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z 1 Arrival Time: t Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name; t '� " t- CaU� �"� v Owner Email:
Owner Name: V<QA Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: Z
Certification Number:
Longitude:
l
� -�.� + 1 � 1 �y Mu ,� � � 1 :' ' � 1 �f';w�"�
I�F"e ;.�" ' i! : ,'1 �/� 'lam ��I• �
MINE!
NNIN
MEN
jr
041.
ME
mum
r
riC`I`
a
.d� y".""3y �: J�, 9 •���;'� ���""'n'1 c'M1�� t`
■ � 1 ' -_ �.�,
■
� 1 -
--
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No fA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye o--_ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Continued

FFFacihtyNumber: JDate of Inspection: }
Waste Collection & Treatment i
4. Is'stor�age capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes o NA ❑ NE
ra. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e.; large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes CNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 13;�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
Na ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 190
NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is thew evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil'
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):.7
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops
designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?.
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YTNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Y❑ NA ❑ NE
Y❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design []Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ja
er21. D es record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ye!Tr
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
WTste Application �eekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysisste aers eather Code
Rainfall �ockitig rop Yield 0 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge. ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

O
IFactHty Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?. ❑ Yes -:t*o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the fa ility out of compliance with permit conditions related t sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No �1A ❑ NE
the propnate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Nan -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
r
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes k CIO [] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of d4ad-animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher t a� al?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of gmcrgenc�ns.as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
=Yes):�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA' ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
horia
'G",-Le ..f t.�w� b'.k �,I-,6 'y .ry ur �rn3
fl pages as necessary):.,
Phone:
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

j
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Kenneth D. Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Ladd:
PAT LMCCRORY
��Cim�rnor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Seciwary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
January 6, 2016 Uircarar
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy/Facility 49-14
General Permit AWC490014
Iredell County
On November 25, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank James R. Ladd, who was present and
assisted during the inspection. .
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; 'however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated November 25, 2015
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490014 - Facility Status: Active permit: AWC490014
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Vlelt. Routine County: Iredell
date of Visit: 11 /2512015 Entry Time: 04:30 pm Exit Time: 6:00 pm
Region:
Incident #
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy Owner Email;
Owner: Kenneth D Ladd Phone:
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address: 400 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
704-546-7476
Faclltty Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 57' 00" Longitude: 80' 42' 53"
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 112 mile. Entrance to dairy
is on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmonv.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James R Ladd Operator Certification Number: 21420
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd Phone : [phone]
On -site representative James R. Ladd Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspoctor(s):
Inspection Summary:
07/22/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.22 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/31/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.41 Lbsl1000 Gallons
04/09/14 > Soil Analysis
Jb
Phone: [phone] ) _
Datd�
page: 1

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 11/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
50
16
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
200
50
Cattle - Dry Caw
50
25
Cattle - Milk Cow
300
58
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSLW: 707,500
Waste structures
Dlsignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 30.00 36.00
page: 2

A
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility : Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: '11/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:.
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes; notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 01111
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
9
page: 3

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility : Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number:
490014
Inspection Date: 11/25/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yee No Na No
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 01111
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
. ❑ 0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
[]
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

0
0
Permit: AWC490014 . Owner - Facility : Kenneth D Ladd • Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date'. 11/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yge
No Ha No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
MCI ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
110 ❑
Other Issues
Ye$Na_aa Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additonai problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

P
MCCRORY
:` Gavernnr
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
sec-iary
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
f]ireclnr
August 2, 2016
Kenneth D. Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony, NC 28634
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy/Facility 49-14
General Permit AWC490014
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Ladd:
On June 30, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank James R. Ladd, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should, be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality. Regional Operations Section.
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 30, 2016
ib
State of Noah Carolina I Environmental Quality I, Water Resources j Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office j 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville. North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

M Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
t
Facility Number:
490014 Facility Status:
Active Penult AWC490014
[] Denied Access.
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Iredell Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit:
06/30/2016 Entry Time: . 03 00 pm
Exit Time: 5:00 pm Incident 0
Farm Name:
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner:
Kenneth D Ladd
Phone:
704-546-7476
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
Physlcat'Address: 400 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 57' 00" Longitude: 80° 42' 53"
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east an Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 112 mile, Entrance to dairy
is on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: ' James R Ladd Operator Certification Number: 21420
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd Phone : [phone]
On -site representative James R. Ladd Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector. James Be Phone: [phone] E
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/17/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.04 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/02115 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.87 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/09/14 > Soil Analysis
ib
LI
page: 1

Permit: AWG490014 Owner - Facility : Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 06/30/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
'Cattle'- Dairy Calf
50
14
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
200
63
Cattle - Dry Cow
50
15
Cattle - Milk Cow
300
65
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSLW: 707,500
Waste Structures
Dislgnated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard . Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 30.00 36.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 06/30/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other.
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (f yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storas e $ Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable `
to roofed pits,'dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Appllica on
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10-Ibs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Yea No Na No
❑■❑❑
❑ ❑ N ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No N^ a No
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑.
Yes Ng Ne
❑
ME]
❑
❑ N ❑ ❑
page: 3 .

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number. 490014
Inspection Date: 06/30/16 Inpsecction Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
vet No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Corer
Crop Type 3
Timothy, orchard, & Rye
Gress
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Cl E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑El
16.,Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
[} ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes,, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? .
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑.
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility : Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number.
490014
Inspection Date: 06/30/16 •. Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No NH
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ■
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Me Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates I:hat exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
' ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 5

Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical' Assistance j
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emerglency 0 Other 0 Denied Access I
Date of Visit: E;= Arrival Time: Departure Time: nty: � `" q Region:
Farm Name: i%e &I � �—� J� ��t ` � Owner Email:
Owner Name: n ' *----1"-' 6Q Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Oper Certification Number -
Back -up O �)� Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
❑ Yes �i NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []No [] NE
❑ Yes []No A ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 4RDo NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
1,,sst5orac pacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Ye to M NA
NB
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [ Yes No\ .�i'1QA NE
Struc 1 Structu • Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate t s o e in egrity of any of the structures observed? Yes NA [� NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [] Yes ❑ NA NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes o [] NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [] s o NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) /
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Analicatiori
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes YQNo A [] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Y o NA NE
essive Ponding� raulic OvCd9adEjTr 3ien Ground eavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
�IIv > 10% or 10 lbs. Phos allure to Inco orate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
��utside of Acceptable Crop Window" vidence of Wind Drift pplication Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): '
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes o ❑ NA � NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ED Y s o NA NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for 1 ion. [� Yes NA NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Ye o NA NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Y o NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have -all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Ye NA NE
the appropriate box;; � J
21. Does record keeping need impt ment? If yes, check th propriate box below. e NA Q NE
e and V1J. s e eather Code
Q•Rainfall ocking ❑ Crop Yield [] inute Inspections nthly and 1" R 1 Inspections udge Surve
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes [:]No A [] NE
Page 2 of 3 214120 ondnued

Facility Number: JDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibre;tee waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑ �NAE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N NE
PLAT 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments certification? []Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues'
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose w' 4 hours and/or document Ye§_ o NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher i normal?
7 H -
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations a uired by the ❑ es o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-app tcation)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Ye NA -NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a f6llow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (reler;to question#):';Explain any�YES answers and/or any additional_recatnmendations or any oZtter'comments * , i �'t
'•." 7 v
[7se�dr`awEngsfoffacllxtywto b�etter.explatn situahons�{use addltional°pages'as necessary) . ',2� ..��� �• ? :' ., �".-, . ,-�,.:.,.� . ,� r., . ,.... LL��:
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 '
21412011

i1
j�
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
Kenneth D. Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony, NC 28634
ROY COOPER
Governor
M_ ICHAE_L S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
March 10, 2017
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy/Facility 49-14
General Permit AWC490014
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Ladd:
On March 9, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Watery
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank James R. Ladd, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, ' should you have any -questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
<&Bealle
,
III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated March 9, 2017
M.
State of North Carolina I Frivironmental Quality j Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number' 490014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490014
Inpsection type: Compliance Inspection inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region:
Date of Visit: 03/09/2017 EntryTime: 02:00 pm Exit Time: 4:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy Owner Email.
Owner: Kenneth D Ladd Phone:
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address: 400 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
704-546-7476
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 57' 00" Longitude: 80' 42' 53"
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 112 mile. Entrance to dairy
is on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts ■ Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: .lames R Ladd Operator Certification Number. 21420
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd Phone : [phone]
On -site representative James R. Ladd Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector.
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
12/06/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.68 Lbs11000 Gallons
07127/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.58 Lbs11000 Gallons
6120117 > Soil Analysis
jb
Phone: [phone] Ex1
Date: 2^
page: 1

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility : Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 03/09/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
50
18
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
200
62
Cattle - Dry Cow
50
6
Cattle -Milk Caw
300
70
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSLW: 707,500
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond W5P 30.00 48.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 03/09/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
.
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage $ Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑0
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
C]
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑0
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ No ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC490014 'Owner- Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number:
490014
Inspection Date: 03/09/17 Inpsection Type; Compliance Inspection, Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yea No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
Cl 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
o ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑E
❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21" Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490014 Owner -Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number:
490014
Inspection Date: 03/09/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ E
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Y2s Na No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection' did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 1111
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

,0
14
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: • +t> eparture Time: only: .4 Region: 7EPV0 V
Farm Name: iZ rY" � � Owner Email:
Co�Owner Name: , Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _ Title:
Onsite Representative: - v' " v---K`�C�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
ch tiy
�k Al`Fc
- t Yka ,,..'^' I ,m_ S ,-•� '9,, j �•., r �,
'
�4
.• aL, rj."-'c. xr
G i
Mrrliii�
�
■
��
�� ��.e�ja z�''aa �t� M+�e
C�_``1!_�1_��''r�A
', �;�s
n
' d�'k{�
Y:O Y .��r 1a1Y��$ it. ��'.!0t
lai "e�., r�Mb
r
�t ,, k��^�. `3�'i�C',�, �',� '.'� '� �"•
k
■
/ 1
-_
t',
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�To'] NA
��
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[:]Yes
❑ NoA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Y
No NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Condmi.

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
}� Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Ye No NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Yes NA NE
❑ Yes `bTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ ental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?' ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes Z!TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[:]'Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of W' d Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12..Crop, Type(s): "
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Y v ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Yes o NA [] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes%o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
klists Desi Maps Lea s []Other:
21. D ecord keeping need i vement? If yes, check th ppropriate box below. Ye N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste, A licatio ��Weeklboard Wast 1 sis Soil alysis Bather ode
infall Stocking 120 Minute Inspection onthiy and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes , [] NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No � ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued
L -

t l Facffi Number: - Date of Ins ecHon: � �t
i
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check []Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of elan als with 24 hours and/or document LLYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of ecmQo&W,si ations as required by the I�Ye o NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31�Doiurface the drains exist a e facility? If yes, check the propriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
lication Field Lagoon/Storage Pond Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did.the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
�ar
Comments,(refer toguesHoii'#) Ez lain any YES'ansrvers=andlo`raany`,addiHon$1 recommendations or:any; other commedts',''��^ r�G;
�.a g�� ia-:,..: SS tV.':: .LIV:`.K�",�V`5�'"::, r ..7a;p: n'�P �"�:'•.-.�1 a5 v^#rR'.�rs.t�'�1� .��^� a+r x'�1:h�9i� .r� ry �o+�: ::'�'t
Usedrawings`offacilityto;better,ex lain:situations;(use'additional.pages;as°nCcesa.ary) ¢
�, LO��b/
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit:. AeWompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical, Assistance
Reason for Visit: 40 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency. 0 Other 0 Denied Access
0ADate of Visit: 2 Arrival Time: Departure Time: N'0 ounty: - Region: VV- `ICJ
Farm Name: L] 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: `'� �-- Phone: f
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contract: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: jovj'-eS , Integrator:
Certified Operator: �t Certification Number:
Back-up Operator
Location of Farm:
P �
r' Al, L-�Z,Certification Number:
Latitude:
Longitude:
iaim
,. `-_ems-���.. w'
-. � - ---,..
;u:.■
�■,.+
h 4 nj 14 i 4 b -.'1
�4���_�J��_��.
h
■
""• •
--
T
r--"•'
I��
NUM
VON
K.
ar
.3y
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [] Ye o ❑i>z):3
NE
Discharge originated -at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? []Yes ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Y o NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faciii Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection &Treatment'
4. Is storage capa"city (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Y CNo NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:]No NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Struc c 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or en ' on threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Ye No NA ' ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aunlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Mo ❑ N E
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn c.
❑ PAN [] PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. [] Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare So1ir�
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence W} Dri Ap lication Outside o roved kea \1
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAAP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ' ❑ NA 0 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Rwnuired Reenrdc & Dneume.nk.
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readi yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
Checklists Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑ r:
Lz�
ecord keeping need im ent? If yes, check�aste
opeate box belo ❑Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
App�StockingF7'&rop
Wee y Freeboard Analysis Soil Analysis as a ransfers eather Code
Rainfall Yield 0 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections fudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? jE]
WN
NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ N NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phos horns loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues 1
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
Y o
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No
C ] NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of a ns as required by the
❑Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑
❑ NE
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
IYes,NA
❑
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain' apy,YES, answers and/or any additional recomimendations or_any,other comments ``.
Use drawiu s of fadliitiio better 'ex lain'situatioiis use additional a es ssa
G:n:Z1 S�
Ca972-zc �lv>k
ReviewerlInspector Name:
Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

4PI"Division of Water Quality
Facility Number � - � 0 Division of Sold and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
FType of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reasan for Visit: 10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: A rival Time: Departure Time: • Rounty: I Region:
Farm Name: ` v't Owner Email:
Owner Name: i ��� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: L
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other
Other
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Ngtt►her✓"���
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop.. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Pullets
Other
Puuets
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude:
Design Current.
Cattle Capacity Pop
MUM
❑ Ye o NA] NE
[]Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No0:5k ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ YeseNoA ❑NE
Yes ❑ NE
Yes ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Ins ection:
1*
Waste Collection &_Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage; etc.)
structures observed?
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes�ON�
NA lE,
❑ Yes A ONE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑NA ❑NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes�No [] NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Y No ❑ NA [] NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application -
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes` ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total .Phosphorus
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window /�❑ Evidence of M
12. Crop Type(s): l..r,.tk R\
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
id Rriff U Applic,
. A
%
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Outside of Approved Area
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the -facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ElYeo A ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes A ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ ease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improve ent? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Ye [ NE
❑ W Application eekly oard aste Arralysis it Analysis ante Transfers Weather Code
Rainfall4W'cking p Yield ❑ 1 0 Minute inspections Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [] Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes A ❑ N1
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Conrxnued

1"acility Number: _ - Date of Inspection: �P y
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facili of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the ap riate boxes) below.
allure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-comZ[l nt s levels in any lagoon
Vist structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Ye ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments {PLAT} certification? _ A
Other Issues_-
28. Did the facility fail to prspe y dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �NoNA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Of •gene s' ions as required by the
❑Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-app ication)'�
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the perm -it or CAWMP?
❑ Ye
A
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question`#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use .additional panes as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
Kenneth Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
06-02-loos
This plan has
Jinn Summers
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Dr.
m oe
eloped by:
APR 2 2009 1
tDWQ
Harmony, NC 28634 Statesville, NC 28677
704-546-7476 1 704-873-67b
Type of Plan:
De eloper Signature
Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
�-13-().s
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
CTec ical Specialist Signature Date
__--'-----------------------------------'-__-'-___----_-----------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-13-2005 Cover Page 1

The Wasted tilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropl eeded to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
OWA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOOO
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5239
1
U2
Cecil
24.70
24.70
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tans
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
32.67
0.00
806.92
5239
2
U2
hewacla-P
4.90
4,90
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
2217
0.00
108.E
5239
2
U2
Chewacla-P
4M
4.90
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
67.90
0,00
332.73
5239
3
U2
Cecil
5,50
5.50
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
811-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0,00
32.67
0,001
179.68
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2.00
2,00
Small Grain, Silage
*7.0 Ton
9/1-3131
*74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.00
17.27
0.00
34.54
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2,00
2.00
Corn, Silage
*20.0 To
2/15-6/30
*209
0
0
Broad.
208
0,00
48.5
0.00
97.07
5239
5
U2
Cecil
9,20
9.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7131
140
0
0
Broad,
14C
0.0
43-19
0.00
397.33
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
2417
0.00
92.22
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3,80
3.80
Cum, Silage
19,5 Ton
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.70
OM
188.87
5239
7
U2
Ccoil
23.00
23.00
Corn, Silage
19.5 Ton
2115-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
0.00
45.04
0.00
1,035.84
5239
7
U2
Cecil
2100
23.00
Rescuegrass Hay
*6.3 Ton
8/1-7/31
*280
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
32,67
0.00
751.3
5239
8
U2
Cecil
14.50
14.50
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
44.11
0.00
639.65
5239
9
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
44.11
0.00
441.14
5239
l0
UI
Cecil
11.20
1.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0.00
49.98
0.0
5239
10 IA
U1
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0.00
91.46
0.0
5239
10 IA
UI
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
21$
0
0
Itrig.
21$
38.03
0.0
186,34
0.00
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page I of 12

Waste Uti 'i�i gable
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
FerL
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A) I
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Metbod
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Torts
1000 gals
tons
5239
10 IB
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
19.67
0.00
89.60
0,00
5239
10 1B
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Corn, Silage
0.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Inig.
218
38.03
0,00
182.54
0.0
5239
11
U1
CeGil
82.50
8.30
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
brig.
191
33.32
0.00
276.55
0.0
5239
112A
Ul
Ceed
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
0.00
56.00
0.00
5239
11 2A
Ui
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6I30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.
114.09
0,0
5239
11 2B
Ul
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1 3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
102,66
0.0
5239
I12B
Ul
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0,00
209.16
0.00
5239
113A
UI
Ceci[
4.90
4.90
Smaii Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.0
5239
11 3A
Ul
Cecil
4,90
4.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
216.77
0.0
5239
11 3B
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.0
5239
11 3B
U1
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38,03
0.00
216.77
0.00
5239
11 4A
U1
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig_
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.0
5239
11 4A
UI
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6130
219
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
O.Ot
216.77
0.0
5239
I1 4B
U1
it
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1 3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
0.00
I06.39
0.0
5239
11 Q
UI
it
3.90
3.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig,
218
38.03
0.00
216,77
0.0
5239
11 SA
U1
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Torts
9/1-3/31
I07
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0.00
123,19
0.0
5239
H 5A
U1
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Corti, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-&30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38,03
0.00
250.99
0.00
5239
11 513
UI
Cecil
3,80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Inig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.00
5239
11 5B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38,03
0.00
216.77
0,00
5239
11 6A
Ul
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Inig.
107
18.67
0.00
95.20
0.0
5239
11 6A
U1
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
2I8
0
0
Irrig,
218
38.03
0.
193.95
0.
5239
11 6B
UI
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911 3131
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0.0
28.00
0.00
729222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 ArU T Page Page 2 of 12

Waste UtIfiiL, cable
Tract
Field
Source
1D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APplic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(IbslA)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
lies.
(lbs/A)
Applio,
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5239
It 6B
U1
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Cam, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/I5-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38,03
0.0
57.04
0.06
5239
11 7A
U1
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
52.26
0.0
5239
11 7A
Ul
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0,0
106.48
0,0
5239
11 7B
Ul
jCecjI
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
I8,67
0.0
70.93
0.00
5239
11713
UI
it
5.30
5.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
144.51
0.00
5239
11 SA
Ul
it
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage.
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
0,00
76.53
0.0
5239
11 8A
Ul
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38,03
0.00
155.92
0.0
5239
11 8B
Ul
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0,00
48.53
0.0
5239
It 8B
Ul
ecil
4.80
4.80
Corn, Silage
0.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
2I
39.03
0.
98.88
0.0
5239
11 8C
U1
ecil
I
3,60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.671
0.00
28.00
0.0
5239
11 8C
Ul
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.001
57,04
0.00
5263
1
U2
Lloyd
7.60
7.60
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.70
0.00
377.75
5275
1
U2
Cecil
II AO
11.40
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0.00
540.0
5275
1
U2
lCecil
11.40
11.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
0,00
12.72
0.00
144.98
5275
2
U2
ecil
20.90
20,90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
0.00
46.2
0,00
965.65
5275
2
U2
Cecil
20.90
20.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-313I
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.49
0,00
260.92
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4,50
Cam, Silage
0.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0,00
213.16
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tans
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.7
0.00
57.23
5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0.00
236.85
5275
4
U2
evil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9./1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
63.59
5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Corn, Silage
19.1 Ton
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
0.00
43.87
0.00
465.02
5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
49
0
0
Broad. 1
49
0.00
11.31
0.001
119.97
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 3 of 12

Waste Utilbz,able
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Res.
(lbsrA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(1bs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(sere)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
pl/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Corn, Silage
19.1 Ton
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
0.00
43.87
0.00
3,553.45
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11.32
0.00
916.7
5310
1
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0.00
748A5
5310
1
1 U2
lCecil
15.80
15.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
1 55
0.001
12.72
0.00
200.9
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27.80
27.80
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0.00
1,316.8
53I0
2
U2
Cecil
27,80
27.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
353.55
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
%50
9.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
97
0.00
22.63
0.00
215.03
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Corn, Silage
19.1 Ton
2115-6/30
208
0
0
Broad_
208
0.00
48.54
0.00
46LI
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
0.00
46.20
0.00
887.1
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Rescuegrass Hay
*6.0 Ton
8/1-7/31
*266
0
0
Broad.
133
U.00
31.
0.00
595.88
5764
1
U2
k=l
32.D0
32.00
Caro, Silage
20.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0.00
1,515.94
5764
1
U2
eciI
32.00
32.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.40
I2.7
0.00
406.
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
4,561.63
Total Produced, IOM -,Ions
3,333.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,228.63
Total Applied, tons
19,723.
Total Produced, tons
205.5
Balance, tons
-19,517.5
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005
WUT Page Page 4 of 12

Waste Utiliz}-Ifable
2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crap
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
FerL
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(IbslA)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NutrimnA
pplied
(IhslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5239
1
U2
Cecil
24.70
24.70
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
Q
Broad.
140
0.00
32.67
0.00
806.9
5239
2
1 U2
hewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
22.17
0.00
108.E
5239
2
U2
hewacla-P
4,90
4.90
Corn, Silage
29.0 Ton
2115-6/30
291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
67.90
0,00
332,73
5239
3
U2
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Fescue Pastare
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
I40
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
32.67
0.00
179.E
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
*7.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.00
17.27
0.00
34.5
5239
4
U2
ehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
*20.0 To
2/15-6/30
*208
0
0
Broad.
208
0.00
4&54
0.00
97.0
5239
5
U2
Cecil
9.20
9.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad,
14o
0.00
43.19
0.00
397.33
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
24.27
0.00
92.22
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Corn, Silage
19.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.70
0.00
188.87
5239
7
U2
Cecil
23.00
23.00
Rescuegrass Ray
*6.3 Tan
8/1-7/31
*280
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
32.67
0.00
751.3
5239
7
U2
Cecil
23,00
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
0.00
12.14
0.00
279.09
5239
8
U2
Cecil
14.50
14.50
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0,00
44.11
0,00
639.65
5239
9
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
143
0
Q 1
Broad.
143
0,04
44.11
0.00
441.1
5239
10
Ul
Cecil
11.20
1.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0.00
49.98
0.0
5239
10 IA
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/3I
107
0
0
mg,
107
18.67
0.00
91.46
0.0
5239
10 lA
Ul ICIIii
4.30
4.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
186.34
0.0
5239F1O1
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0.0
89.60
0.00
5239
U1
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Com, Silage
0.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
182.54
0.05239U1
ecil
82.50
8,30
Fescue Pay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33,32
0.0
276.55
0.05239
UI
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18,67
0.00
56.00
0.0
5239
11 2A
Ul
Cecil
3,60
3.60
1Corn, Silage
0.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
1 Irrig. 1
218
38A3
0.0
114.09
0.
5239
11 2B
Ul
Cecil.
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
1 brig.
107
18,67
0.0
102.66
0.00
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 5 of 12

Waste Util", _,"able ear 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use
Acres
Lipp
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
R,4d
(lbs1A)
Comm
Fat
Nutrient
Applied
(1WA)
Res.
OWA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOW
gaVA
Tans
1
1060 gals
toes
5239
11213
U]
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
209.16
0.00
5239
11 3A
Ul
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.391
0.00
5239
11 3A
UI
it
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
216.77
0.0
5239
II 3B
U1
Cecil
520
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.0
5239
11 3B
Ut
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Corn, Silage
0.0 Ton
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
216.77
0.0
5239
I1 4A
Ul
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
19.67
0.00
106.39
0.00
5239
11 4A
Ul
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
ITrig.
218
38.03
0.00
2I6.77
0.0
5239
11 4B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.0
5239
11 4B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Com, Silage
20.0 Tan
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
216.77
0.00
5239
11 5A
U1
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
UO
123.19
0.0
5239
11 5A
UI
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
250.99
0.0
5239
11 513
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.00
5239
11 5B
U1
1Cecil
3.80
3.80
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
219
0
0
Irrig.
219
38.03
0.00
216.7
0.0
5239
11 6A
U1
ecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0,010
95.20
0,00
5239
11 6A
Ul
C=iI
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0,00
193.95
0,00
5239
11 6B
U1
Cecil
1.30
t.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
28.00
0.0
5239
11 6B
UI
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Com, Silage
0-0Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
2I8
38.03
UO
57.04
0.00
5239
11 7A
Ul
Cecil
4,00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig-
107
18.67
0.00
52.26
0.00
5239
11 7A
Ul
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
106.48
0.0
5239
11 7B
U1
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Small Crain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0,00
70.93
0.0
5239
11 7B
UI
ecil
5.30
5.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
2I8
39.03
0.00
144,51
0.
5239
I l 8A
U1
kwil
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
76.53
0.0
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 6 of 12

WasteUtili3L- gable
'"ear 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs(A)
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(%s/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nu rientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
IV
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
IOoo gals
tons
5239
11 8A
Ul
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig_
218
38.03
0.00
155.92
0'00
5239
11 8B
Ul
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0,00
48.53
0.0
5239
11 8B
Ul
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig_
218
38,03
0.00
98.88
0.00
5239
11 8C
UI
Cecil
3.60
3.60
ISmaH Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
28.00
0,0
5239
11 8C
U1
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38,03
0-00
57.04
0.0
5263
1
U2
Lloyd
7.60
7.60
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7131
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.70
0.00
377.75
5275
1
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
144.98
5275
1
U2
lCecil
11.40
11.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/I5
144
0
0
Broad_
144
0.00
33.60
0.00
383.07
5275
2
U2
Cecil
20.90
20.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12.49
0.00
26092
5275
2
U2
Cecil
20.901
20.90
Soybeans, Manured, Rouble Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33.6
0.00
7022
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.0
57.23
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/I-9/15
144
0
0
Broad_
144
0.00
33.60
0.00
151.21
5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5-001
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
63.5
5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33.60
0.00
168A1
5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11.32
0.00
119.97
5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Soybeans, Manumd, ruble Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
0.00
29.87
0.00
3I6.61
5308
1
U2
Vloyd
81,00
81.00
1Sma11 Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
1132
0.00
916.72
5309
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
ISoybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
0.00
29.87
0.00
2,419.37
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3131
109
0
0
Broad_
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
200.94
5310
I
U2
coil
15.80
15.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
UO
33.60
0.00
530.92
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27,80
27.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
_ 0.00
12.7
0.00
353.55
5310
2
U2 ICcoil
27.80
27,801Soybeans,
Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0,00
33.6
0.00
934.15
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 7 of 12

Waste Utilh4ft .. able
E
ear 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(16s/A)
Comm.
Felt
Nutrient
Applied
(ibs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrien
pplied
(UWA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N1
1000
ga1/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
97
0.00
22.63
0.00
215.03
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Corn, Silage
19.1 Ton
2/15-6130
208
0
0
Broad_
208
0.00
48.54
0.00
461.1
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Rescuegrass Hay
*6.0 Ton
811-7/31
*266
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
31.04
0.00
595.88
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
t9.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5764
1
U2
Cecil
32.00
32.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1 3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
406.96
5764
1
U2
Cecil
32.00
32.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33,60
0.00
1,075.28
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
4,561.63
Total produced, Iwo gallons
3,333.00
Balance, woo gallons
-1,228.63
Total Applied, bons
15,204.77
Total Produced, tons
205.5
Balance, tons
-14,999.27
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 8 of 12

Waste Utiliz k,�able
3
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Read
(lbs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Appliie.
Method
Manure
PA
NuttientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
low
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5239
1
U2
Cecil
24,70
24.70
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0,00
32.67
0.00
806.9
5239
2
U2
hewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*95
0
1 0
Broad.
95
0.00
22-17
0.00
108,62
5239
2
U2
Chewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Cam, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6130
291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
67.90
0.00
332.73
5239
3
U2
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
32.67
0.00
179.68
5239
4
U2
Wehadkec-P
2,00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
*7.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
*74
0
0
Broad.
7
0.00
17.27
0.00
34.54
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2,00
2.00
Corm, Silage
*20.0 To"2/15-6/30
*208
0
0
Broad.
208
0.00
48,54
0.00
97.07
5239
5
U2
Cecil
9.20
9.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
9/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
43-19
0.00
397.33
5239
6
U2
it
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
24.27
0.00
92,22
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Corn, Silage
19.5 on
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.70
0,00
188.8
5239
7
U2
Cecil
23.00
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
0.00
12.14
0.00
279.09
5239
7
U2
Cecil
23.00
23.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
32,67
0.00
751.3
5239
8
U2
kil
14.50
14.50
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad,
143
0.00
44.11
0.00
639.65
5239
9
U2
il
10.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0,00
44.11
0.0
441,1
5239
10
Ul
ecil
11.20
1.50
Fescuc Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0.00
49.98
0.00
5239
10 IA
UI
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18,67
0.00
91.46
0.0
5239
10 IA
U1
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Cart, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
hrig.
218
39.03
0.00
186.34
0.0
5239
10 1B
U1
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
89.60
0.0
5239
10 IB
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38,03
0.00
182.54
0.0
5239
11
Ul
Cecil
82.50
8.30
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0.00
276.55
0.00
5239
11 2A
Ul
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Smal[ Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.0
56.00
0.0
5239
11 2A
UI
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Cam, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
21$
38.03
0.0
114.09
0.0
5239
11 2B
Ul
Cecil
5,90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
lrrig.
107
18.67
0.00
102.66
0.0
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 9 of 12

Waste Utiliza��fawe
Ly--4ear 3 't
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Cmp
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fer,
Nutrient
Applied
(IbslA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs(A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(aae)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5239
11 2B
UI
Cecil
5.90
5."
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-650
218
0
0
brig_
218
38.03
O.M
209.16
0-00
5239
11 3A
U1
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1 3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.00
5239
11 3A
Ul
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
38.03
0.00
216.77
0.00
5239
11 3B
Ul
ecd
5.201
5.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tans
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106,391
0.0
5239
11 3B
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Cote, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15 6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0-00
216.77
0.0
5239
11 4A
Ul
Ced
5.30
530
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.
5239
11 4A
Ul
Cecil
5.30
530
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
216.77
0-00
5239
11 4B
Ul ICecH
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
10639
0.0
5239
It 4B
U1
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig_
218
38.03
0-00
216.77
0.00
5239
11 SA
Ul
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Small Gain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
I07
18.67
0.00
123.19
0.00
5239
11 5A
Ul
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
1 218
38.03
0.00
250.991
0.0
5239
11 5B
U1
Cecil
3,80
3.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
106.39
0.00
5239
It 5B
Ul
Lil
3.80
3.80
Com, Silage
20.0 Tan
2115-6130
218
0
0
Irrig.
21
38.03
0.00
216.77
0.0
5239
11 6A
U1
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0.00
95.20
0,00
5239
11 6A
Ul
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Cam, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
o.00
193.95
().001
5239
11 6B
UI
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
aGO
28.00
0.0
5239
11 6B
Ul
Cecil
I.30
1.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-00
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0.00
57.04
0.
5239
11 7A
Ul jCecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Inig.
107
18.67
0,00
52.26
0.00
5239
11 7A
Ul
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
2I8
38.03
0.00
106.48
0.00
5239
11 7B
Ul
Cecil
5.30
530
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
OW
70.93
0-00
5239
11 7B
Ul
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Corn, Silage
0.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0.00
144.51
0.0
5239
11 8A
I U1
ecil
3,20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tans
9/1 3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18,W1
0.00
76.53
0.00
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 10 of 12

Waste Util'iz. - i!'able
----fear 3 J
Tract
Field
Source
M
Sail Series
Toial
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applio.
period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(IWA)
Comm.
Fen
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
I000 gals
toes
5239
11 SA
UI
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Corn, Silage
0.0 Ton
2115-6130
218
0
0
brig_
218
38.03
0.00
155.92
0.00
5239
11 8B
UI
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tans
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
48.53
0.0
5239
11 8B
UI
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Com, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0.00
98.88
0.0
5239
11 8C
Ul
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0.00
28.00
0.00
5239
11 8C
UI
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
39.03
0.00
57.04
0.00
5263
1
U2
Loyd
7.60
7.60
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49,70
0.00
377,75
5275
1
U2
oil
11.40
11.40
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tan
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0,00
540.0
5275
1
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1 3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
144.98
5275
2
U2
it
20.90
20.90
Cum, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6130
2I8
0
20
Broad.
198
0.00
4610
0.00
965.65
5275
2
U2
ecil
20.90
20.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad_
5
0.00
12.49
0.00
260.9
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2/15 6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0.00
213.1
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
57.23
5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad,
203
O.GO
47.37
0.00
236.85
5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad,
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
63.5
5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Corn, Silage
19.1 Ton
2/15-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
0.00
43.87
0.00
465.02
5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
911-3131
49
0
0
Broad
49
0.00
11.32
0.00
119.97
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Corn, Silage
19.1 Ton
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
0.
43.87
0.00
3,553.45
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1 3/31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.0
11.32
0.00
916.7
5310
1
UZ
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0-00
47.37
0.00
748.45
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.72
0.00
200.94
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27.80
27.80
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.37
0.00
1,316.8
53I0
2
U2
Cecil
2T80
27.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
55
0,00
12.72
0.00
353.55
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 1 i of 12

Waste Utilh�, `able � ea[ 3
Tract
Field
Source
lb
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(I WA)
Liquid
ManwrA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
Ions
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
97
0.00
22.63
0.00
215.03
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Com, Silage
19.1 Ton
2115-6/30
208
0
0
Broad.
208
0.00
48.54
0.00
461.1
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19,20
19.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 btr_
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33.60
0.00
645.17
5764
1
U2
Cecil
32.00
32.00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Ton
2/15-6130
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47.3
0.00
1,515.94
5764
t
U2
evil
32.00
32.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3131
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.7
0,00
406.9
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
4,561.63
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
3,333.0
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,228.63
Total Applied, tons
Total Produced, tons
205.5
Balance, tons
-17,922.98
Notes: I. in the tract column, -- symbol means leaser!, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol s means user entered data
728222 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2005 WUT Page Page 12 of 12

' � n �. 4 11 { 4'. 'S r i ,1• '- 1 51 1 1 - �r , { I � } ✓..`ff
iv
` u' N.;r !fi•tt,:. `I� 7'r'A, f', 'r. t Y �' ria 'J, A� #}. r:.'al a A:M1 -'.I,, �'. ,•'I 1 '10 ;FI
a >a
91
qp
r 1 � r il k!}l�$1• d . r IFR ' �iJ ^ r�' IA#hht•'�j" ""r�5;r � i!' t" � r7 1 5;1 ' : 1'y � �.
�`e i � r �1^ ::' {{ r a , � +', �-.M•FI I�.. r�� �, ,, „t kuv'i f 1� S _V.w spy # ��,�•„III ry
r.,
1
i WI
l°I
�. e9�,_� „•§ � � . s A + t_. �Y � � •'Y: � B i� A a y�. BA , �, ` �- } B 4 h � � q.
: �y., 4 � 1 5d ''.i •� Y ' � '', � �Al N 'l ... { I i a k �� ° 4 �' ' r 1)�. ':il A .1. .
M ?� � �� A • � n I�•'RV 'l, f 6 �. N 1 I � ! 1 1 ,,�' F " •4rR.
1
qA' n _ i iIF a f t
1
{A a •ti,, r s B S,
:
_
i, fr
k
�
r` •.6 1 f I� 1 ke�,., � � � dqh' ,T � ii 1 : , nl I I r� � �� � '"� .
i.
1.
- y
. = 1
c v
��; ,� ,'I, A'�' I�, '�r `., Xi,}. 1+i7t'°wj�kxs':c ''' �rj.,•b! �} r
�e
r l
i
F� �„ '� 1 a V: .i1%•i
:
a r'TSRi: i i 1 n 4& ff a y xAW .
1� d.a`hI "- ��++ r r i,l r r,� ' t Y3 '��j ,i �} II�-.� � !• a� 3 �i•+
m n d
15
if
lot
: y► 1 radk ,t,k'I" r r
ny
3 1i o � f�� >} a } .i i h� • Y_ A4 1
cl
tv
h
r i vi
BI''� d # � "!el MI ,G ':1w 1 �r+ ,-.�f 14 i!' r rA s •1- 1 ��', ,. e
], Aw.
1 r.if n R r IV A:e 9 A Al { A k'+�
-
#
��'�I?��#+� 'i 'Ih IV r 1� �{':�,r1 ;!i' 1 I,! 1 n�G �'; � f„ 1 Il A i r^' t �y�•#�..
� II �p�',• h, .1.5� i 1 .�; .;•.� 5`' M v � r �� � �+�,,I + `I
W I k , f f S Y r 1 N BP�r71�x''1 +. it F�'Sk � J :� y r 4`• � i bi ��I � Syr' A 11E ,�I �,V �.,I
r ��'G�'�.vi �,}5yr� h 1 a �.�•vS}. , r''�I "r h r ::5' � I f .� � sB . �i�, 'S + v

4t
r a
>y "-1 � Y7r 'I' � � � ��'r���7;� ,., •� it �MF�' .w- , s ''�' ���,. .' -
•'i, Yil. � y f I dM �,.
i !
i-M� r rX_ z { � �,j � 1 r �x r t r ��• � � .. ��� rb b.
» + 1 r -
3 I. { { t
.p f Vp 1qn ,fir„i
• r irN `"tr �;,l 'n� r �r�' � > l�qt 6ai4 k� i} z � 1 � `. k& a',��^
6 !' } iIM
t W • �E 1. 1' "�"�
• _ + N y} y !4, 7 '' fury,. F+ r� 1r r:. • n
gol
0111
.f q�Y'r,r
i" FFF
�. ^; 1� �z a a �� 1� ..cw e � p, � �k$, 3'' - - itp r�e� -1 � �hfrr ! rh: � ^� � 'rta• ' i r" 6} x
r.,, { - rnyF 3^�+� r , �: '• r i "fib � .�rr..�'q -¢r
�� ���; 'I �� '.�Iz b�7- !I rF' + iui T° rs. ,, '.�•F, N i���;,�r. � �'I, +_. � �k' �� 4 �'.
a 'r r� f - I.p P { I ��� ::y { i r, r r :�� � ,�„Salf ,.r r { � 'Ar s • x �
y 1 1�J �vn.r Pr ; 4yM F, r r
r �� m ,; L
�
R. -
i 1 qJi
l 4i yt; p s w 4 s
C r'pr
or
, o�{f7z �r'fm rt►;" r �b i ('+ �f ��i4$tr � '�o !i. + �:y. r�' �� �d'�� i � "r.
:':C: ��' ti. i �! r,'i. v' x ' - !I � ,b �,7, 67 .., yr: ;.� 3r ! � �r. r.:re{r .r• -y� .max„
:
,
I ?.
.:, ., !.'rtCr �'` � - rrr!'.,c. n7' �•'1. � f�' '4'•' :�i"�,yx,�',� , t _ +yr , rP r{s rli �y � �� �,4 $S _
: �,. ,. �•"Y' ).�,.1 I +t h1�3 5���� ti r'{ie� !.3 it iY 11y4t if�"�Yi�r�'r' !' irf� !F_: Y � L I, y ,���.! �'V.Y i`Ib i,. ..
f 1 w i:r f��,.. •.P nl r: P�LMk'nI�i�le�r��1
T
r'• TT
!�'
rf
,--
Will..
l k
17, +
r
- t. f�. h f. �•" � !:. ,AR ��C,,4.,. 1 ;r�`'�� I:'vr� � ��ft f'��."�,y, `hi{ ati. ✓a¢;rh"'��L :W:':r�?r• i'� ! � [ -�+"
.:I:.. �� .''• e".�`a� „c ���;. G, �,S. ',� �,df•��r �`I,- rtln, ,.{k,r, .. ,�:' Ira^-q'•J � �..
., ,:, ,,. h ,! � { :.,.l,.. ' � •��� .?-Fi ." 9u� �`�e� - � �� r ,;. .:::
���� iV `�p 1y� .�.NixN/�� , i ,� -''.ya .i; � � �i{.G,iV 71 pq,;,.��rW�},__��r:-' � � r,�7k
,Lirr4µ V.�}}�1� R. b r i_r.,',r ,. 1.r/ .J Yt K ;r ? §y'.. 'K,'t1•h
Vii I,!>.. i i? j1{�. �:. ;,; .. 5.: ." �k 1 �: i t si.:.ih lye V. :{.f
�r�� r'�d,93{, ti �. 5 c C r';°r_ -d� Y �4_ _�f; K�r: - �.!,�
1yr'u Mtn I !
i E$! s1
F4 IV.ff• - `F*r # + ,� 1 n.,, r z. '41 f a"'h : �' ,i_ rp ,f
a,..iex ^'...:�"a.yk IsC tr � , - �t •':. � _-. � � ` � ...� a•�rl ; �":�.• � �, _ 3 �. i ' fyy �"', .
g SON,M 13
7 SAW

' { y rt ,y. f :. blj Y• �,) - r, t" ti rY'ir ski:, � N....1. � I1M Nth.
:y
'OT
-yy�� ri }nlf 4}�b�M1S f �a 4:lS 1ry,'! AiF
v + Jf", 1 t d f " ark,
}'Rr
ti,� r
f ,
y, b
M1'. 1 � S17,h �N Ifi 9, wr E, �� I° �' � '�' ��•�. r '.P:'. e rr, !
disa+
IN f ! I
OL
-
�r
, r
'u
�i,�u rm 'p)t ' ... �,. � 'rt ;:': � y���i t1,16�iJM1�� I � 1 �' c � r �.. � II � ��,r ��� �.,�NNf t• ,1 kw
itIJ��,pyi
.:1 � 1 1'I �1 1 v I+ r ar,.r''%� I it
.y�rR�' ,r !' A Y�,Iri ..�,.,.,- _i.,."�.
e
�' 1. .. 1 R i V "I, ���r
11
5r C5.4''�dNvst?'t�i���,�,
I
, k A
,
t8
t I1� '. �1 { `.:• ry3u�p �. I �P ; I 'L lk r.' rT� 'i(. �+� � '' J'
6"� ., v i� L°' � �.� �• { >dY'�kR �l f��h t Y�yvi �°�� .ur :..
�+gg;
�� If i} 1.61 � y
NIII 71' tal
'r °+ ,:� I r a ttii �' � �''" � � �IYf 3 �' �' � ,y �S �� }Ir v 9', � tJ' �'•
A
r
t 4'
i1,7mr,w45r'r°rr
E , 4:,�,, 9 t 1. I! G� � � ♦'� '�.
AI
,, r : r
4
�.Al
It
, r P a.
�;"�gY,!'v ry
r:: �b r 7 rze` k is � a.'�ar � ' ku �: ` rt" S '°� ty;. ,�+r��, `:�•�:a�`'Srv.:.
F.;� gin• � b�" . �y 4 r Tu .
mw '' r�;1•°ti-.4�i 1 1 N+4t .tM1 IiUf 14 i ! ',;p!,. ,d 6.'i: R -Ig ,
.7,:.
N 4
' Af' : i,}rF�' f��l.,�rla°r± �I�i57 �.� Z-'. r 11+?rt'� 1 In. , 1', •w,. I v1
�Ili
i
H ati'fi w � 3 C
r
`� ! �"` ��- 'rl 16 I ,•�'�� I°'�n�i I ' ��` �.'{'h NF" F '�' ' � 1 '�, f . , �+".��W�y1�re h� I�,�rc��IR� ,�� .1'
y
�r ,. d. M �.,� 'f. ,I r; �RJ;l�I'`r r,.'i r�, a � l+.,, ,,r�,. � q�f�:'i �4 ,� :•:na
l I�Ir! 41'�i "� - ' �:'•1j r1+��r�;.L
r r
F
I
�e
f
I-

49 Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 0. Division of Soll and Water Conservation
d Clther Age�icy
Type of Visit: 19 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral d Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 L Arrival Time:�Departure Time: County: Regionif 1'tDm
Farm Name:-�6 `aS Owner Email:
Owner Name: f `� e �--a �+c-�t Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
jaW�'{'C-'
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Title: Phone:
Integrator: _
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
La er
Non -La er
Non -
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design*Curren
Cattle Capacit
Dairy Cow
Pairy Calf
R Heifer
Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes
'J�'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No')RA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volurne that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. 1f yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
tA' Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 1 .�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):#
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there strictures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes_ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No nT� ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NLJ.W ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes t�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes`_ No ❑ NA ONE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lq ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of W' d Drift �❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 4
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWM1s? '
❑ Yes MS6
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Aim ,❑ NA
[] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes jo I+
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?14
❑Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box,
s s Design 'teVe_ Agreements ❑other:
21. D record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Y No ❑ N ❑ NE
Waste Application ee Freeboard ante Analysis 'Soil Analysis rite Transfers Weather Code
lllnfall tockin Crop Yield Df20 Minute Inspections onthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,No [] NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No�A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

acili Number: - Date o(inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes —1!jZo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher t normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office oLemergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-app icatlonw)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 1�5o ® NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9 ❑ NA
❑ Yes [ NA
❑ Yes ro[] NA
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
❑ NE
NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

� 4
Type of Visit: IF Compliance Inspection U Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: 161,'ab Departure Time• + ounty: 1 Region:
Farm Name: " ►y"e �"er Email: -
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: d44 Integrator: 7-7
Certified Operator: z �l� iJ 41 �~ l Certification Number: Z 2
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine '.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Latitude:
Longitude:
resign Cgrretaf Design Current.. " Deslgt C,
opacity Ptlp WetPoi�try Capadty'op Code Capacty�,,
ILayer
Non -La er
Design
Current
Iry Peffltru '(`_'eriarltiv" . Poi."
Boars I jPullet
#Other
Other
e .
11 II"0
....
r, M I
MAA.
s
M Ift—W
Discharaes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
}'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No iA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No j2fNA
0 NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ a OVA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NJP' A ❑ NE
Strupture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:",A'
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) �'���
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Ye sNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? ���
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes '5Z5o
0 NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes J?�o
❑ NA
[:3NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
nce of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
� , �� c�klA CaQ,
Akr ; b 4 , je Qs°�_j
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements
❑ Yes _jj;�lVo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No
0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o
❑ T sA ❑ NE
❑Yes�o
❑ Yes*o
❑ Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[] NA, ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
21. Do record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �] NA ❑ NE
AppI' do �e kly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis aste Transfers Weather Code
k aunfall Locking Crap Yield 120 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections _-Easruage Survey
L22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑Y o ❑NE
21412011 Continued

lifacifityNumber: - 1 jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?3Z ❑ [3 Ye [3NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ) P+ ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dea 'mall with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of mer enc situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ';LZ LIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
■ ■
MWE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes to NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Cni<nterents (refer to,qslo#ExglananYES answers aadtor any additional recaminendatians or any other;cb...... s.
Use dacaIn>xs of facllty to:better explain situatlona fuse additional pales as-neceseaMy)
v R =n . 19 1
.- 5 --�>Uv C1,12.
C'O�,I��S 11 � � 5 T
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
o"/
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

r
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit • Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: PWl2 Arrival Time: 02;efa Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: COV L" A 1 S _y Owner Email:
Owner Name: O jVl ____ q _._ .. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ,_ j_
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Region:
Phone No:
Integrator:
--_ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number: v
Latitude: 0 0❑ 6= Longitude: 00
0 f= G
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et ,
Dry Poultry
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Puults
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Po,leti'on
ai Cow
—26M
11 7 "]
airy Calf
1 Sd _II
_':�D
Dai Heifer
ISS
My Cow
Sn
Mon -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
c. What is the estimated voltimr that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Ye CNo ❑ NA ❑ N>J
El Yes ❑No❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No t2t:!59 ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes n El NA ❑NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0 'A i I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
tructur 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes -E3o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [I ME
Stricture 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes t - ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes � El NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes ``NL& ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NTio ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ YesXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application Outside of Area
C C -` k* S°. Gt C v�r
12. Crop type(s) --------- _
13. Soil type(s)
14. Da the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 4ANo
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'[Yes No
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
1 S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
l � 2� i `� "`'yam ►� �-i���l�b �°'�U'�``S
/ l 1
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewerllnspeetor Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the approprrate box.
r
❑ Yes k ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ta ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
E-- aste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard .E waste Analysis E,SeirAnalysis aste Transfers Annual Certification
-CJ Rainfall�tocking rop Yield 20 Minute Inspections 01gonthly and 1"Rain Inspections .0Weakher Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 2l�ty
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higltiT-76—annormal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhrispection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes �4 ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �NA
❑ NE
6 Yes ElNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA
ElNE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �VA
❑ NE
❑ Yes., o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes '1*,qo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � 1 o
❑ NA [INE
❑ Yes I'�-o
❑ Y No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490014 — Facility Status: &;five Permit: AVVC490014 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliaoce Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rcutine�_____ County: Ire ll Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 06/2912011 Entry Time:12:30 PM Exit Time: Q2-00 PIVI
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & 5ons Dairy
Owner: Kenneth D Ladd
incident #R;
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 521 - ox_Hunter Rd Hgrmony NG 28634
Physical Address: 400 Fox Hunter Rd HarmonyNQ 28Q24
Facility Status: ® Compliant (] Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35c570" Longitude: 80°42'53"
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 112 mile. Entrance to dairy is
on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: James R Ladd
Secondary OIC(s):
jj Waste Collection & Treatment jj Waste Application
ji Other Issues
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd
On -site representative James R. Ladd
Primary Inspector: Jame alle
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspector(
7�1
Inspection Summary:
03/30/11 > Waste Analysis > N = 23 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/09/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.4 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/25/11 > Soil Analysis
IM
Operator Certification Number: 21420
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Date:{
IK
Page: 1

0
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth 0 Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 06129/2011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Oper2fions Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
50
12
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
200
85
Cattle - Dry Cow
50
25
�1 Cattle -Milk Cow
300
130
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSLW: 707,500
7 ILF— .Ln C!—.—&a ...--
Type Identifier Closed hate Start Date Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
rite Pond WSP 30.00 48.00
Page 2

f
� 4
Permit: AVVC40CC14 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 06129/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? (_I p:.I ❑ C 1
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n ❑
0
0
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
n
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potentiat adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
f=1 ®❑
C�
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0 ®
0
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
t-1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe ❑ ® n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ®❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
®
n
D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
to
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
in
n
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
OBUD
improvement?
11 is there evidence of incorrect application?
0
®❑
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
171
I leavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: 3

Permit: AVVC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Cate: 06/29/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application
-- --
f_ I
PAN?
-
n
Is PAN > 10%110 Ibs.?
n
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
❑
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 2
Timothy. Orchard, &
Crop Type 3
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14 Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
D
M
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
0
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure anftr operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
®n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage fnr land application?
n
®❑
1 B. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl
0
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
-
NE
'19. bid the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
F1
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of tine CAWMP readily available?
n
®n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n
VVU P?
Page4

Ir
Permit: AVVC490014 Owner -Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number; 490014
Inspection Date; 06/29/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspecttan Reason for Visit: Routine
Rocords and Documents Yes No NA NE
Cl;ecklists? f 1
Design? n
Maps? n
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
if Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ® 0 n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
F1
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
n
Soil analysis?
n
Waste Transfers?
n
Weather code?
n
Rainfall?
n
Stocking?
n
Crop yields?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
n
Sfudge Survey
❑
22 Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0
R f] n
21 If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rair:breaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
O ® n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
® n n
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
box(es) below
Failure to complete annual sludge survey n
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels n
Non-carnpdant sludge leve€s in any lagoon (—
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance,
26 Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? n n f Wl
Page: 5

' � I
Permit: AWC49CO14 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: OU2912011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NE .
27. Did the facility fail to sfrcure a phosphorous loss assessment (FIAT) c<€lific. tic;n"
t l
i I
fA ( _l
Other Issues
Yes..No
NA NE
28. Did the facility fart to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
®
00
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
n
■
n ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
®
n U
freeboard problems, over -application)
31 Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
O
®
n 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32_ Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Camgliance Inspection Inactive or Closed gate:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Iredel� Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 03/25/2010 Entry Time: 1,1 30 AM Exit Time: 12.30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd _ Sons Da„iryOwner Email:
Owner: Kering(_h D Ladd-__ Phone: 7 4 4 -747
Mailing Address: 521 F2x Hunter rd _ _ � I Harmony NC 28634 _
Physical Address: 400 Fox Hunter d Harmony NC_28634_
Facility Status: E Compliant
Location of Farm:
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: 35°_5.7'00" _ Longitude: 80°42'53", --
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 1/2 mile. Entrance to dairy is
on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: James R Ladd
Secondary OIC(s):
6 Waste Collection & Treatment JW Waste Appiication
jj Other issues
Operator Certification Number: 21420
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd
On -site representative James R. Ladd
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James B It Phone: [phone]
Ext. 62
Inspector Signature: Dater
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
03/04/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.97 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/21/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs110D0 Gallons
03/06/09 > Soil Analysis
E.
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Inspection Date: 03125/2010 Inspection "type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Dairy Calf
50
61
Q Cattle - Dairy Helfer
200
50
Cattle - Dry Cow
50
20
Cattle - Milk Caw
300
13C
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSL,W: 707,600
Closed Date Start bate Desiqned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pond WSP 30.00 32.00
Page: 2

Permit: AVVC490014 Owner- Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 03125/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Discharges & Stream Impacts 0000
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at
Structure
Application Fie4d
Cl
Other
❑❑■❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Yes No NA NE
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e.1 large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management !� ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
1
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
improvement?
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n_
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number : 490014
Inspection Date: 03/25l2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cam (Silage)
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type S
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
❑■np
n■nr❑
n■❑in
n■❑n
Yes No NA NE
n■n❑
n■nn
n
Page: 4

P
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 0312512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Records and Documents
L�
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
El
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ E 0 ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Q
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
i-1
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n_
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
In
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
0 n ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ 0 ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
D %l
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n n D
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ 0 n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ 0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Inspection Date: 03/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 490014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n n
0■nn
0 0 0 0
Page, 6

w
Bealle, James
From:
Knox, Ben
Sent:
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 8:42 PM
To:
Bealle, James
Subject:
FW, James Ladd Info Sheet
Attachments:
Ladd, James W06051.pdf
Importance: High
James,
See the below email I sent last week. I had your email address wrong. I hope it comes through this time, Call me if you
have any questions. 704.213.0434
J. Ben Knox
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
patries.
J. Ben Knox
Regional Agronomist NCDA&CS
585 Lentz Rd.
Mt. Ulla, NC 28125
7041278-9414 office
From: Knox, Ben
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:58 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: FW: James Ladd Info Sheet
Importance: High
Jaynes,
Please see the attached information sheet for James Ladd. I picked up waste sample at Southern States back in late Dec
or early Jan. It got put into a soil cart and was not found until they got to that cart in late Feb. Note the date of 12-8-09 for
when they pulled the samples.
If you need anything else please let me know.
Sincerely,
J. Ben Knox
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
patries.
J. Ben Knox
Regional Agronomist NCDA&CS
585 Lentz Rd.
Mt. Ulla, NC 28125
704/278-9414 office
From: Carpenter, Darlene R
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:28 AM
To: Knox, Ben
Subject: lames Ladd Info Sheet
Importance: High

w
Please see the attached, requested copy of James Ladd's info sheet. If I can be of further assistance, please let me '
know.
Darlene
PWSM Advisory Section
***My email address has changed to Darlene. Car enter nca r. ov - please update your records.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Form AD9 (revised October 2008)
SAMPLE TYPE
(circle one I see IPStructions)
Predictive Diagnostic
Research Out of State
SAMPLE INFORMATION
WASTE SAMPLE INFORMATION �
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division PlantlWastelSolution Section {f �
Mailing Address: 1040 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-104ffl
Physical Address (UPSIFedEx): 4300 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh NC 27607
Phone: [phone] Web Address: www.ncagr com1agronorni
GROWER INFORMATION toleaso orinn
ff
i Waste Arlal}ISIS
REPORT
I!l 06051
DATE REC'D 1 _ -
PAID
CONSULTANTIOTHER RECIPIENT
FARM ID
SAMPLED BY
LAST NAME FIRST NAME PHONE
LAST NAME FIRST NAME PHONE
O�' j.CY
pz7l (p_)i-4v-Lt 1
(_--) --_ — —__--
NO. 0 LES
C UNTY(where collecte) "A
ADDRESS
f7 ' -
)& ili�Tc d 4
4
ADDRESS
CITY STATE ZIP
CITY STATE ZIP
(see tee intorma 0
ECK ayabtetoNCDA&CS)
YY CRDER ( ) CAST I
( ) ESCROWACCOUNT (enter aocl_ name)
C{✓!1`!j i.p �!l
Results are available wtilim ff,,N.C. samples Qtt y). Please check this box if you do ROt need (t tepr�rf minted to me.
E%TRRTESTStS101 LAB USEDNLY
LABNUMPIER
WASTE APPLICATION CORRESPONDING SAMPLE 113 No ��
(leave blank)
SAMPLE ID CODE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION I COMMENTS METHODS SOIL PLANT SOLUTION NH, metatm CCE
PH EC c aZU s
56r,�G
Y >P�
ltii
HOW TO FILL OUT THE INFORMATION SHEET (provde.all informationrequested iri shaded areas)
APPLICATION METHODS
SAMPLE TYPE —,predictive samples are analyzed for nutrient content. The report will provide interpretation & general recommendations.
An agronomist reviews results of diagnn.stic samples, identifies potential nituitionai problems & makes suggestions for management
BR � Waste broadcast on soil surface
Research is for samples submitted in connection with an approved research contract agreement.
and left uncovered for one week
Out of state is for samples submitted from outside North Carolina-
St = Waste broadcast on soil surface
GROWER INFORMATION — Provide contact information (phone with area code, address, e-mail) and area where sample was collected.
and plowed or disked into soil
PAYMENT — Calculate total fee based on number and type ofsample types and any additional tests (see back). Indicate method of payment.
within two days
SAMPLE ID — Provide sample identification (no more than six digits or letters). Put ilie same 1D on the sample container.
WASTE CODE — identify the type of waste in. the sample by using codes (see back of information sheet).
IN = Waste injected directly into the
soil and covered immediately
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ! COMMENTS — Briefly describe problem or reason for sampling (necessary for diagnostic samples).
APPLICATION METHODS — Select One or two application methods .from the list at the right for estimation of nutrient availability_
IR = Waste applied through irrigation
CORRESPONDING SAMPLE ID --- List the 1Ds of anymatching soil, plant or solution samples submitted.
system and left uncovered for one
EXTRA TESTS — indicate nonstandard tests desired: nitrogen breakout (nitrate & ammoniiun), heavy metals and calcium carbonate equivalence.
week or longer
S
_1/

Division of Water Quality
(� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490014 _ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AW 490014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qgmoliance inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: lredell _ Region: Mouresvilla
Date of Visit: 1J(/22/2009 _- EntryTime:03:00 PM
Exit Time: 04:30 PM_ Incident #:
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons DairyOwner
Email:
Owner: Kgnnglh D Ladd
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hurter Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address: 400 Fox Hunter Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Latitude: 35'5,7'00" Longitude: 80°42'53"
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel
east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 1/2 mile. Entrance to dairy is
an the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection
& Treatment Waste Application
jj Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James R Ladd
Operator Certification Number: 21420
Secondary OiC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative James R. Ladd
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James tie
Phone: Ext47 8 24699
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
0812l/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons
05/04/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/06/09 > Soil Analysis
Jb
Page:1

J
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Cate: 10122/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Cattle
Design Capacity
Current Population
O Cattle - Dairy Calf
50
20
Q Cattle - Dairy Heifer
200
60
Q Cattle - Dry Cow
50
60
Cattle -Milk Cow
300
105
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSLW: 707,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Bate Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 30.00 45,00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Bate: 10/2212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ fl
Discharge originated at:
❑
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
❑
❑
■ ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■ n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
0 ❑
if yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I,e.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
t1
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AVVC490014 Owner- Facility: Kenneth U Ladd
Inspection Date: 10/2212009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490014
Reason for Visit Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
Tl
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0
■
n
n
Plan(CAbVMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0
■
❑
Cl
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
rl
■
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
0
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
W U P? Cl
Page:4

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 1012212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? 0
Design? ❑
Maps? 0
Other? 0
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ii
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
0
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
it
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
0
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Cl
Stocking?
Annua! Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■ n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q
is 0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
13 ■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0 ■ 0
Other lssues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additionai problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ n 0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
0
IN ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
0
■ 0 Q
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

a
A
Permit: AVVC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number : 490014
Inspection Date: 10/22/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional ❑WQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? fl M ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector Fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? C] ■ ❑ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
O■DO
Page:6

Division of Water Quality
m..-,...... ' n Division of Soil. and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 44 KC1.4 Facility Status: &-Aive Permit: AWC49QQ14 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance InspeclIon Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rnj{tine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: GMT12008 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Kenr)eth D Ladd
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Harmony NC 28634 _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°57'00" Longitude:80°42'53" _
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 1/2 mile. Entrance to dairy is
on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
0 Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
im Other Issues
Certified Operator: James R Ladd Operator Certification Number: 21420
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd Phone: [phone]
On -site representative James R. Ladd Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date: 4
Secondary Inspector(s): Q_J
Inspection Summary:
04/07/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/11/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/03/08 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in May, 2008.
12
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 05/07/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Dairy airy Calf
50
15
Q Cattle -Dairy Heifer
200
45
Q Cattle - Dry Cow
50
20
Cattle -Milk Cow
300
130
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSLW: 707,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 30.00 48.00
Page: 2

l^
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
T Inspection Date: 0510V2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:. Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 0 ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
❑
❑
or closure plan? ,
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 05/07/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
nurin ni ri��rurr� r.w.n�
Reason for Visit: Routine
-
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P2O5?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
11
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ n ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 ■ Q n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D ■ n 0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

4"
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number:
490014
!nspection Date: 05/07/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
rirrnY
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
D
Maps?
D
Other?
Q
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
D
■
D
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
D
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
Rainfall?
D
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
D
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
Stocking?
D
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
D
■
❑
D
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? D
D
■
D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
D
D
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
D
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
D
■
D
D
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
D
D
■
D
Ve-
k1-
AIA
Mr-
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those D ■ D D
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air D ■ D D
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

. "7r
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
ti
Inspection Date: 05/07/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? I I ■ n n
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 ■ fl n
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0000
Page: 6

04/ 22/ 2008 13: 42 7045462234
,ti v+n e 5 i!)e e ,. L,L C—
UV-
Vke d
LADD
PAGE 01
Fe s c a e c. n of d)r c.. k a rck t r- a 5 S c.ca ,:� .S
war,+e- t✓1Gn �.ritcri4 Pi ►�, en�'�Y1
0 vL {
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
Kenneth Ladd
521,Fox Hunter Rd.
06-02-2005
This plan has been developed by:
Jim Summers
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Dr,
Harmony, 2VC 28634 Statesville, NC 28677
704-546-7476 1 7-87.3-676
Type of Flan:
�-3r Signature
Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operotion and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste "Oliration plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications eonceraing animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
Date
This plan meets the Minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission. r
Flan Approved By:
Tcc cal Specialist Signature Date
- - r - - 1 -- - - - - - - - n - - - - - - R
Proviow Database Vmion 31 Date Printed; 06-13-2005Cover Page 1

MN
'42 7045462234 LADD PAGE 02
below provides a surnmary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field, Realistic Yield estimates
for each orop in the plan, In addition, the LeaChing Index for arch Meld is shown, where available.
)ps Summary
Total
Acres
Usoablc
Acres
L=hing
Index (LI)
Sol] Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
24,70
24.70
NIA
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4,2 Tons
4.90
4,90
NIA
Chcwacla-P
5mali Orain, Silage
Corn, Silage
•9.0 Tons
25,0 Tons
5.50
5,50
N/A
CcGll
Fescue Pasture
4,2 Tons
2.00
2.00
N/A
Wehacil ec-P
Small Grain, Silage
►7.0 Tans
Corn, Silage
+20,0 Tons
9.20
9.20
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
3.90
3,U
MA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
23.0
23.00
NIA
Cecil
COM, Siia c
19.5 Tons
Rcscuegrass Hay
•63 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bts,
14.50
14.50
NJA
Cecil
Fe5CU& PMtUre
4.3 Tons
10,00
10.00
NIA
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
11.20
momp�
1.50
mammon
NIA,
Cc it
Fescue ;ly
4.3 Tans
ON
4.30
430
N/A
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Corn. Silage
20.0 Tons
4.60
4,60
NIA
Cecil.
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tuna
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
82.50
a.30
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4 3 Tons
3.60
3,60
N/A
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tares
5190
5.90
N/A
Cecil
Smal# Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
4.90
4.90
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage-.
9.6 Tons
COrn, Silage
20.0 Tons
5.20
5.20
N/A
Cecil
Small Cirairt, Silage
9.6 Tans
Guts ',i1a ,.
20.0 Tut
5,30
5.30
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.4 Tons
Com, Silage
20,0 Taal
atabase Version 3.1 Doc Printed 612/2005
taans user cntorod data,
PCs page I+age I of 3

06/1112608 11116 7045462234 LAD➢ PACE 01
ac)
4 G11c3 2)e�11c. 10a 6o4O
F'� 3S_
,spy �„3 • lcO`i
�TpOn Da,r,
S aE Fox �
uwk-e " Ra
aq
V koAt '704 5 q b - ,)1 7 a-
FaY. 704 5q�, i23q
Cr>�'.b�ak°inn
,Jla�.r .-A - J - a % - OR
CALIBRATING SOUP AND SEMI -SOLID MANURE SPREADERS USING THE WEICINT•AAEA MFrNOD
1. Spread a tarp or plastic sheet aver the ground turlaca and secure with pEns of small weights, The tarp shoaid
have at least 100 square fee[ (9'X12', 10'X1gr, etc.) of soAace area.
A. width —/ 10 X length L10 .6. /d 0 f[s
2. Start applying manure downrange of the tafp and spread directly across the center of It In a manner similar
to the regular spreading patterns and settings of the appllcatat (speed, spreads seranga, ovedap).
Trial 1 TrIC 2 Trial 3
b. Forward speed, gees, or
throttle setting U7 —•-.— --,—,—
c. PTO speed or selling?--
d. Spreader gate setting
3, Transfer the manure collected on the tarp Into a woighing container and weigh using 00 accurate set of spin -
tension or pladorm xaks.
a, Empty weight of welghing container—ra�.".j�Y`,� —. ---[bs
f. Gross weightofcont$fner+manure n�x= —.-� lot
g. Net weight al manure (f - e) — ._-...—.......�- �- ibs
A. Compute the manure application rate:
h. Area ar tarp (a) --- OL--Oy-- -- h[
I, Application rote (g+ h)
I. Application rat. (IX 43560+2000) �A y + tonsfacre
S. Compute the nucr[ent appkatlon rate.
to Manursalwlysis N 16sr[on
p$o, �, Y _ _..-- lbslton
1. Applkadon rate N ,, 9..a, `.—_..�... Ihslacre
0 X k) pso, J..�a 3 _ .. — lbslacre
KsO •,j,�. ��n.7 5 __ ._ Ifsslecre
6. R the appligtlon ram 1 not acceptable, repeat the procedure at diderent spreader settings, speed$,
or both (Item 2) until the desired apPilsatlon rate is achieved.
Prepared by
1.C. AoW4 Mbpkal and AgntUR-Ml EnglMering Estwoon SpedaWe
RA. Evan,, elofnglw) and Agricultural Engineering fxcenslan Sprelallst
D.A. CMM SO SUsnre f$tMODn SOCA I
2,saa copies or than publkdacument rvwrrpr6iled at a mr ss' $409, or 5.24 peraopy.
Pa WlOtwa ey
NORTH CAROLING COOPRR %, EItT[NHON NRvwE
DM�Staerae In sam,.ranc. a11M Ash el C-si as ce MAya ana Juno w, Stitt.—Playlnant ana P,egrarh dppananlaM anah$M h
ellpaanla ragardlaaeW raN,aalar.na[lanal9,1p ,Me.pe, al areah1111Y�Nash GaraIIM Bhta Zlnivaraity. Nanh Caolfm AaTfMal
llniverUly, ll,B. DepahMAnl a1 Atl Haulll[re, en9 Ipell ghvarnmann 000"ratln .
y/9i—z5M—.IMnn[Etrroxw w.M4
m+.tlr«

,>
p
-'�c
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Kenneth D. Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Ladd:
vvimam U. rcoss Jr., secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 10, 2007
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2007-PC-0816
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy/Facility 49-14
General Permit AWC490014
Iredell County
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on November 30, 2007, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
Facility illegally discharged animal waste into an unnamed tributary to Hunting Creek
beginning on November 29, 2007. At the time of the inspection, the situation was in the
process of being addressed. This is a violation of General Permit Condition I.1, and 1.2,
and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The Division, of Water Quality appreciates your prompt response to the discharge including the
required notification and reporting. We are in receipt of a copy of the press release. Please note
that General Permit Condition III.16 requires maintenance of this documentation for at least one
(1) year after the discharge and must be distributed to any person upon request,
Division of Water Quality / Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] IVo Cara%Va
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: www_ncwsterpuality.ora �►HrurQi'y

Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Di
NOTICE of VIOLATION
Deeember 10, 2007
Page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report dated November 30, 2007
cc; Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Animal Feeding Operations Unit, Raleigh
Regional Files
jb

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soli and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490014____ _ _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type. Comoliance Inspection __ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Emergency County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 11/30/2007 Entry Time:10:30 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Kenneth D Ladd Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
Location of Farm:
Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude:35°56'48" Longitude:80°42'48"
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 1 /2 mile. Entrance to dairy is
on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Certified Operator: James R Ladd
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 21420
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd
'��T7T�trL•!�.'il'.�L•Irl:1
On -site representative James R. Ladd Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: (f?ts4)aw `-al6a
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
1. Notification received on 11/29/07 regarding the illegal discharge of animal waste into an unnamed tributary to Hunting Creels; NOV
to follow,
10.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014 R
Inspection Date:11/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Emergency
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
❑ Cattle - Dairy Calf
50
❑ Cattle - Dairy Heifer
200
❑ Cattle - Dry Cow
50
❑ Cattle -Milk Cow
300
Total Design Capacity: 600
Total SSLW: 707.500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond WSP 30.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any park of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
■
13
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
5,000 Gallons
■❑❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 2

-z L\�
d4
vo

11/16/2®97 13:22 7945452234
LADD
PAGE 81
3
Rohs Carl Ladd i Sons Dairy
Farm 4 49-14
On November 29, 2007 at 2.45p.m. we started to pump
waste and were getting lines charged back up after
we saw that the pressure wasn't normal at operator
levels. We thought the pump may havf. had trash
built up in it, as it had in the past. We thought
that was the cause for the pressure not being
correct. After finding that there was no trash in
the pump, we then chocked for valve leakage. A
leak was detected at 3:30p.m., and was immediately
corrected after shutting the system down. Personnel
were onsite at all times during the time of the
waste spill. Monitoring of the waste spraying
equipment was occurring from one end of the field
to the other, and as the back side of the field's
equipment was being checked the leak was occurring
on the front aide of the field's drain valve.
Emergency Management was notified.
The valve leakage was due to trash in the valve,
which kept it from closing off properly when the
pressure was applied to the lines. The trash blew
out of the valve causing it to leak.
To further prevent any future spills from occurring
we will be having someone checking the lines and
the valves for leaks as we are charging them prior
to and during waste pumping.
To assist with the cleanup of this waste spill we
have put hay bales in the water streams to filter
out the waste and to help clean up the water.
We are also in the process of conducting a waste
analysis.
+ Y 2 d

tome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy 49-14
Subject: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy 49-14
From: James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:33:07 -0500
To: [e-mail]
fyi...
http_//www.statesville.com/serviet/Satellite?pagename=SRL/MGArticle/SRL BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1173353715480
jb
James Bealle <[e-mail]�
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
i of 1 12/3/2007 11:33 AM

Hay used to battle manure pileup I Statesville Record & Landmark
Page 1 of 2
N
ISearch I Gof
Front Page
Local News
State News
National News
Statesville's Most
Wanted
Sports
Newspapers In
Education
Weather
Hurricane Center
D.C. Dateline
2008 Elections
Subscribe
Local Video
Photo Galleries
Faith and Values
Iredell County
Churches
2007 Physician
Directory
Games
Health
Movie Listings
Submit a Letter to
Editor
TV Listings
Obituaries
Search All Ads
Place Your Ad Online
Newspaper Ads
CarSeeker
HomeSeeker
.lobs
Our Community
:•
Media General Sites
Advertising
Contact Us
Work Here
Printer -Friendly Version d§
Emait this Story i©
Hay used to battle manure pileup
From Staff Reports
Statesville Record and Landmark
Monday, December 3, 2007
Emergency crews used hay to
clean manure out of a Hunting
Creek tributary in the Yadkin
River basin Thursday evening
after 5,000 gallons of
wastewater from a spray field
irrigation system leaked.
Terry Ladd with Rome Carl
Ladd and Sons Dairy in
Harmony said a missing cap at
the end of an irrigation line
caused the incident.
State law requires
municipalities, animal
operations, industries and private property owners who operate waste
handling systems to issue public notices when a waste spill of 1,000
gallons or more reaches surface water.
Subscribe to the Newspaper
O 2007, Media General Inr_. All Rlghts Reserved
* our Terms & Conditions *
re el
64wstice
hookedget
`.
Y �
.:,.
pfu :let a Vi A
Vls bcertificate
Cfeaf�ltrr'v�`
n�pn-spcmd i�4osrto.',
4 me
Ist month
FREE,
Envw wEd u�, �tr
http:llwww. statesville. comiservletlSatellite?pagename=SRLIMGArticle/SRL_BasicArticle... 12/3/2007

CArQ spill to stream lredell Co
Subject: CAFO spill to stream Tredell Co
From: Andrew Pitner <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:35 -0500
To: Todd Bennett <[e-mail]>, Rick Shiver <[e-mail]>, Ted Bush
<T'[e-mail]>
CC: susan massengale <[e-mail]>, James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Hey Folks,
I just wanted to make sure y'all are aware that there was a spill from facility
49-14 (Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy) yesterday that made it to a creek. We got the
call last night, and James Bealle was out there this morning to see what had
happened and to advise them about what they're required to do. Apparently, a
portion of the irrigation system failed and they've estimated that approximately
5000 gal was released to a tributary of Hunting Creek in northern Iredell County
near the town of Harmony. At this point, they've made efforts to contain and clean
up what's left. Based on our previous experiences, this facility is typically
fairly well run and the operators have been responsive. If anything else
significant comes up, I'll pass along the word. Andrew
Andrew Pitner, P.G. - Andre_w_.Pitne.r@nc:.mail.ne_t
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office (MRO)
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
MRO Main Phone: [phone]
Direct Phone: [phone]
MRO Fax: [phone]
1 of 1 12/3/2007 9:51 AM

C.,* ;, ident in lredell County (HARMONY) on 11/29/2007 06:19:36 PM
Page 1 of 2
NC Division of Emergency Management
Emergency Report Form (Rev 2.0)
Taken by: M Cline
Date Reported: 11/29/2007
Time Reported: 06:23 PM
Date Occurred: 11/29/2007
Time Occurred: 06:00 PM
Reported by: Paul Webs#er
A ency: Iredell County E
113hone: 704-437-2489
County: Iredelf ----71C!tv.
HARMONY
EM Area: W 11
EVENT TYPE
Weather Event:
HazMat Event:
Wx Event Name:
HazMat Class: NIA
HazMat Mode: NIA
FNF Event:
Non-FNF Event:
SAR Event:
FNF Type:
FNF Class:
Fire Event:
Complaint:
OTHER EVENT: Water
Contamination
Event Description: A breach of an irrigation system on a dairy farm resulted in approximately 5000 gallons of
manure spilling into a creek. local EM requests NCEOC have a representative from DWQ contact him.
Attachments:
Deaths: In arias: Evac: Radius:
[Responsible Party: James Ladd Dairy Farm RP Phone:
Point Of Contact: IPOC Phone:
Event Location: 496 Fox Hunter Road, Harmony
Latitude (decimal degrees ) (NC inland range is 33.840 - 36.588 degrees. Values outside these parameters may
be used.)
Longitude (decimal degrees) (NC inland range is 75.460 - 84.322 degrees. Values outside these parameters
may be used.)
USFS Bloch -Square -Paint Svstem: Block= Square= Point--
IIRRT Request: No IIRRT Mission No.: IIRRT Team Number: II
COUNTY AGENCIES
LEMC. Y SO: PD: LFD: Y CHealth: Sewer: PWRK:
Other Local Agencies.
STATE AGENCIES
A/C: SHPlSWP: jjEnv. Mgt: A Water: A DRP- CAP: DOT: DMV:
Other State or Federal Agencies:
Notes: 1830- Dana Foley, DWQ briefed.
2015 - P. Webster called in update. They have scene under oontrol to DWQ's satisfaction. Scene location Lat 35
Deg 56.49 N, Long 80 Deg 43.05 W.
2205- John Grey, a contract engineer for the town of Mocksville, contacted NCEOC to advise that they have shut
down the intake of their water treatment facility. The creek that was affected is an intake of their system and they
are going to resume operation only after the water has been cleared for use. He also requested to speak with
DWQ.
2207- Paged DWQ.
2212- Dana Foley briefed and given contact info for John Grey.
http://149.168.212.171EM live/EMReport.NSFla6413acc3O4fce69852566f20012732fl9f... 11/30/2007

lucident in Iredell County (HARMONY) on 11/29/2007 06:19:36 PM
Page 2 of 2
2220- D. Johnson briefed.
2222- D. Gee briefed.
2224- Capt. Briggs, PIO, briefed.
2240- R. Tuttle briefed.
EM Hours: SAR Hours: Call #:
e
_j
http:// 149.168.212.171EM_livelEMReport.NSFla6413 acc3O4fce69852566f20012732fl9£.. 11 /3 0/2007

Is
y
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
. ..................... ......
Facility Number: 420014 Facility Status: Active - Permit: AWC490014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
IEjeason for Visit: Routine __ _ ___ _ County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 08/24/2007Entry Time:01:30 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Kenneth D Ladd ___ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant I_J Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°56'48" — Longitude: 80°42'48"
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 1/2 mile, Entrance to dairy is
on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: .lames R Ladd Operator Certification Number: 21420
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative James R. Ladd Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd Phone. [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: tiff 2l 7
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
03/21/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/11/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.90 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/14/07 > Soil Analysis
is
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number; 490014
Inspection Date: 08124/2007 Inspection Type: Complianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Cattle
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle - Dairy Calf
50
30
Cattle -Dairy Heifer
200
40
Cattle - Dry Cow
50
30
Cattle - Milk Cow
300
96
Waste Structures
Type
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
600
707,500
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond WSP 30.00 48.00
Pager 2

Permit: AWC490014 Owner- Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 08/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure f=1
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
Cl
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
171
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
0
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any requ€red buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

C
Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number: 490014
1
Inspection Date: 08/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%I10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
171
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com
(Silage)
Crop Type 2
Smali Grain
Cover
Crop Type 3
Crap Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animai Waste Management
❑
■ n
0
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
(3
■ n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ Q
0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Facility Number : 490014
Inspection Date: 08/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
n
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
11
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigaticn equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
n
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
I-
■
\IX
❑
\IC
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the 'inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit; AW0490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number : 490014
Inspection Date: 08/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ 0 0
32 Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? Cl ■ Q 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
00110
Page: 6
0

4
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490014 , Facility Status: A,gtive Permit: AM490014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance lnsoecllon Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12101/2006_ Entry Time:04;00 ,PM_ � Exit Time: 05-30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy _ Owner Email:
Owner: KPnoetb Q Ladd __ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 5.21 Fox Hunter Rd I HarmonyNQ 2N24
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 55'56'48" Longitude: �0'42'48"
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 112 mile. Entrance to dairy is
on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James R Ladd Operator Certification Number: 21420
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative James R. Ladd Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name James R. Ladd
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [72?ss't6�
Inspector Signature:
Date.bad1 W 1'
Secondary Inspectors .
Inspection Summary:
08/08J06 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.3 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/20/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 1 8 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/08/06 > Soil Analysis
12
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number : 490014
Reason for Visit: Routine i
Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 300 179
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 3000 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490014 Owner- Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number : 490014
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharnes & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
❑
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
■
n
Cl
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
discharge?
__..._.-......._... Collection, Storage & Treatment
Waste Co ... _.. ........... _.._....._..
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
if yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
Q
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
IQ. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
o
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth 0 Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 121011206 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs ? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Sail Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16 Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Small Grain Cover
❑■00
n■nn
n■�❑
n
Page:4

Permit: AVVC490014 Owner - Facility: Kenneth D Ladd Facility Number: 490014
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine .
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ ❑ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? in
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
in
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n ■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 0 0 ■ 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
D
27. Did the facility faii to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n n
29. Did the facility Fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the Gme of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490014 Owner- Facility: Kenneth D Ladd
Inspection Date: 12/0112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 490014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page 6

WATF,9
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
O�
Q�
William G. [toss Jr., Secretary
O� -
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Allan W, Klimek, RE, Director
p *�
Division of Water.Quality
November 24, 2004
Kenneth Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony NC 28634
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490014
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
In accordance with your application received on November 8, 2004, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Kenneth Ladd, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number
AWC490014 which expired October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy, located in Iredell County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 300 milk cows, 50 dry cows, 200 heifers, and 50
calves, and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please_pay careful attention to the record keeoina
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
One
Nbf Carolina
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service A tur,11111
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnative Action Employer— 50°% Recycled110% Rost Consumer Paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per t5A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at 715-6698.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ec's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Pile AWC490014
APS Central Files

r7
y
Type of Visit I
Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation
O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
0 Routine O Complaint
Q Follow up Q Referral O Emergency
O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: `IS - 0 -F Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��� I r Region: I P60
Farm Name: Qo C Q-A.1,� 4— S„ 3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: +efL LA41j Phone:
Mailing Address: 5 2- 1 '-x 14,-- m N C rd 1 G
Physical Address: I; ee
Facility Contact: DMk 44d� Title: ©wA-rl� /DY C Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 1;:7 Integrator:
Certified Operator: '�0%44 S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
f Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
L,0,14
Operator Certification Number: 1 q ao
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 = I = It Longitude: = ° 0 f 0 "
Design. Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
21 Dairy Cow
Kj Dairy Calf
ER Dairy Heifer
-a- ?
FS1 Dry Cow
S�
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: F7
Discharp,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance than -made?
b..Did the discharge .reach waters of the State? (If yes., notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached wafters of the State (gallons)?
f d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 25 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

i* i
Facility Number: Y I — 10
.Date of Inspection I i Irt -o¢
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier: t.V'S P
Spillway?: he5
Designed Freeboard (in): 'R CO
Observed Freeboard (in): is
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes
M No ❑ NA [I NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
tO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
)E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
l2. Crop type(s) Coral 5'6a e -:5 ',48 xcttt''j
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,❑
Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
5d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
r N q gr 47. °� a \a
Reviewer/Inspector Name Ph
one.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: It -- K-0 S
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: of j S� Date of Inspection I -I S -057
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp [l Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
©No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
S�►e�rr4 kee�trsS =r, 2 d C.'14 24S
12129104

ttA.-IoQ6
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretery
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 21, 2004
Mr. Dale Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd
Harmony NC, 28634
Subject: Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC 490014
lmdell County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Mr. William Burke of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June 8,
2004. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be properly operated and maintained and
all records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be
self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Burke or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
ENR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 877-623-6748 FAX (70+4) 663-6040

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 6»8»Z404 Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
Farmvane: ............................................................ County: JrAdga ................................................ iY.[ Q...........
OwnerName: Kglililgtji................................. Ladd............................................................ Phone No:%6:.747.6 .................................................................... ..................................
Mailing address: ���.�a�.�1�iltlrx..Raa.d ............................... ........'UaxzaatAX...N.C.................................... ........... Z�6�4..............
................................ .......
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:.....................................................................................
Certified OperatorUaJ[m.& ...............................Ud.d .................................................. Operator Certification Number-ZI.42.Q .............................
Location of Farrar:
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 1/2 mile. Entrance
to dairy is on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony. .T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' S6 48 Longitude F 8-0 ' 42 48 .i
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray .field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IS No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................ 1................ ........ :.......................... .................... ........ ........ ................. I ............. ........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 60
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 49�--14 Date nt'lnspection 1 6-8-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes N No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Corn (Silage & Grain)
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
appear well maintained
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name W,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
12112103
Date: G I+ _ ,
Continued

Facility Number: 49-14 Date of Insp..tif)n r 6-5-2004
Required Records & Documents
21, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available'?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
PIES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain raiubreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey'?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall []Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

11
I t
Type of Visit )4 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit ARoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number 9 ! y Date of Visit: ^ ec-+ y Time:
Nat Operational C Below Threshold
Zj,Permitted-n Certified 13 Conditionally CertMedd 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
FarmName. ..Asd...........M..!l ............................ County:....rrh�/............... ........ .,........ ,........ ..........
Owner Name: ... 0fta.... :aw................................................................................. Phone No:... �!O f�...~...5 ` .'..,... ..4� �.. ...........
MailingAddress:.. n$. ... °. .1 !^ ................................................................ M Y....1�....................................... -25$ 43.Y..
Facility Contact: ...O.P?k.... "t..Set!ta........ Tide; .................... . .......................................... Phone No:..................................................
OnsiteRepresentative:.....As........L g!�� ................................................... Integrator: ... ...... ........... .....,........................................... .......... ....
Certified Operator : ................................................... .......................................................... .. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm -
[]Swine ❑ Poultry CgCattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0• ' 0" Longitude • t 66
Swine
DesRgn Current,De Design ". Current Aesiign Cut°rent
pa. ty p Capacity: `Popttlation
Capacity;;;Population,.;a;Poultry,:
Ca ci Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
El Boars +—
Ntuttltear of,�agoqus
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes O No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Cl Yes ',No
Structure. 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stricture 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): G D'
12112103 Continued

Date of Inspection Facility Number: 'j — y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes V No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes JZNo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes MNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes $[ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ANo
elevation markings?
Waste ADulication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Ef No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .91 No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Go
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Ps No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes P No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes PWNo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes [;gNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes NNo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes R No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes RNo
Air Quality representative immediately.
commobW r ttr questioni#) ; Eacl �y3T$ ��e�� �❑ Field Copy
� eFinal Notes
uft dt iwih bU&MtY to bekterex�situ �o �'}�
f 4 P1 liO4d 12'c— r A ApPeArt we 11 M A.:.) �.,�,�.►�e1►�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Continued

+ Facility Number: y 4 — 1 4y Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C'No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
ERNo
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,8 No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ER No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
NPDES Permitted. Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

,t1-AJ "Aj
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 6, 2003
Mr. James Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Ladd Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage #: AWC490014
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on November 5,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Q _
NCDENFt
Customer Service
1 877-623-6748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street. Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

�� ,x .: f♦ Division of Water Quality.
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
' i ` ash7 r�✓'�"s f 'Ps i t. 0 Other AgenC�
r �, .,' �..� ��. ,�. �°� �� �_ n•� t„rc,. �e.lf� L, 7'S-..i,:::1" e 'Tti"' .�. r.: x .. '..f .,, i '��` , �, ;�l$E,'` .. �4 �„h,i„�,n .� �':i'i,�,
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
t Date of Visit: r 11/05/2003
Facilitv `umber 49 14�
Q Not Operational Q Below "Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified jQ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: �iatiue..Carl.L�ad .,S:anJs I?airy............................................................. Country: I. gdell................................................ lY Q...........
Owner Name: Ke111 ctt................................. Ladd.................................
flailing Address: ���.�Si,�.HlAptlrlC..I{�€A(�............................................
Facility Contact: .................... .......................................................... .ritie:
Onsite Representative.,],ME,5.LAD.0.............................
Certified Operator.jamg.&.& ............................... Ladd .......................
Location of Farm:
Phone No: 5.46: i4,1ft................................
TUrmony...K.0....................................................... 2 4..............
..................................... Phone No:.................
Integrator:
OperatarCertificatiart Number:Z1.42Q.............................
Prom the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 1/2 mile. Entrance
o dairy is on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
❑ Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse latitude 35 • 56 48 Longitude 8t7 • 42 48
Design Current
Swine C anacdty Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ®Dairy 600 I2Q
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 600
Total SSLW 840,000
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Sprav Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste :Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
IV
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Dischar�w.e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in ��alimin?
d. hoes discharge bypass a lagoon systen•t? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 7 Sirticture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................. ..............
Freeboard (inches): 48
AC/n?/nI
i'nwfiw.—A

iI J/ VJ! V I
Y
Facility Number: 49-14 Date of Inspection 11/05/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
I- il114enueu
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in. compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
r
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
FACILITY WAS PROPERLY OPERATED AND RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan Johson .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /' 1-- Date: ` --
J

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN UrETT REQUESTED
Kenneth La- -
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony NC 28634
Farm Number: 49 - 14
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
1 0FM4W'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLtNA DEPARTMENT OF'
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.10C, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of
this letter, your farm has six 60 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting
documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996),
Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by
the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your
application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. if any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
�R: J ,• f � I Y r�
or "'Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Kenneth Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
IT V
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 31, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWC490014
Additional Information Request
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 30, 2000:
1. Your facility was certified for 337 animals. However, your waste utilization plan is for 230 cows. Please contact your technical
specialist to verify and revise, if necessary, your waste utilization plan to reflect the correct number of animals on the farm.
2. A site visitation report filed by a Division of Soil and Water inspector found soybeans on the spray fields. Please
include in your waste utilization plan all the crops that receive animal waste.
3. Please submit the second page of the Site Evaluation Form to be included in the permit package.
4. The waste application windows given in the waste plan is unclear. Please clearly specify the waste application months
for each crop and field separately.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 30, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
cc. Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
Sincere] ,
JR Joshi
Non-Dis
arge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

14C DEPT. OF RVIROMMEMT
AN
3 P ,T' It ;_ �E: ' Iktli�iChael F. Easley, Governor
IESVILLE W':'.. ; rr
. William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Clina 'jtt of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
F't
VAN 2003Division of Water Quality
January 13, 200
Kenneth Ladd
WATERV U i'Oumber 49 - 14
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony NC 28634
Subject: Public Meetings for Draft Renewal of State Non -Discharge Animal Waste Operation General
Permits
Dear Producer:
Your animal waste management facility is scheduled to be issued coverage under the Animal Waste
Operation General Permits in the near future. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently
in the process of renewing the Animal Waste Operation General Permits and is scheduled to have the
permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for
coverage under the reissued permit.
The Division has published a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of
the draft animal waste operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext. 574
The Division will be conducting public meetings regarding these renewed permits. The following is a
list of dates, times, and locations of the public meetings:
February 3, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Kenansville — James Sprunt Community College
February 4, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Wllliamston — Martin Community College (Bldg. 2 Auditorium)
February 6, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Iredell — Iredell County Center
Further information can be obtained by reviewing the Fact Sheet available at the website and address
listed above.
w.
}fie
Cc: e i �' t�/1i r , .....C&ON
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Application File 49 - 14
AA��.
N NR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:l/h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Michael F_ Erskx Covemor
William G. Ross Jr_. Secretary
North Caraiina DepartMent of Environment and NaWral Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 31, 2002
James Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Ladd Dairy, Site Inspectior
Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Alan W, Klimek, P E . IAirector
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 30,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained; and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
N. C. Divisions of Water Quality 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 26115 Phone [phone]f99
FAX (7D4) 663-6U40
=J&
t4[MEW,

Facility Number 4� ]4 ate of Visit' 1Q13QI2002 Time:
1
I Fa - -- 0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:... -... __ ._ _.
Farm Name: RQmc.Gam'1.LaddAk.RQ s.AakY...................................... Count)•: Iiceddl.................... ......... ........
Owner Name: 1 11xt~th---------------- I.gl ..._._-----------_--.-.-.---- Phone No: S k:Z47h----•_...._..
Mailing Address: 521YUffflaxen.RoAd....................................................................... Hay:r>«na-M.............. .......................................... 180.4 ..............
Facility Contact: ................Title: Phone No:
........................................................... .....................................................................................
Onsite Representative: dAD'l�S�l3----------------- ---------- Integrator:
Certified Operator:J,aTlo►e5A ............................... Ladd- .... ........................................... . Operator Certification Number:ZI41Q.............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Fox Hunter Road and Dyson Rd., travel east on Fox Hunter Rd. approximately 112 mile. Entrance *
:o dairy is on the left. General location: Northeast of Harmony.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry IN Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • S6 48 Longitude SO ' 42 48 .,
Design -'Current benign ..:'Current Design ` ` kCurrent _
;Svt'lne CRP,acity Population Poultry Ca adi -Population ".Cattle :capacity%capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 250 14.
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other _
❑ Farrow to Finish �T oW Di esi CS a1; . ' 250
❑ Gilts P �'
❑ Boars T'nta7'SSLW"''1 350,000
1
Subsurface Drains Present JI❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) D Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal; min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than froth a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
NVaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
StRiCtUre 1 StrUCtUrC ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ........................... .......-------------- ..._.. ........................................... .......... ........................... ................... .........
Freeboard (inches): 12 -
Fero s in 1 f•.....s.....,r

.00
v.riv,►rvx
Facility Number: 49--14 Date of Inspection 10/30/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste 6uplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
a..vruuucu
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ Wi3P, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
- 0 Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.

4. Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the
appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the project
submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the dowtslope surface waters (tire surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow
toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore, you are required. prior to submittal of the application package. to submit this form. with
items I through 7 completed, to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum you must include an 8.5" by I l" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located.
Identity the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the
classification. reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.1 Farm Name: Route Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
4? Name & complete address of engineering firm or teclutical specialist; C._Lipe Barrier. Jr_Fnvir_omental Specialist. lredell Soil
and Water Consenntion District. 444 Bristol Drive. Statesville. NC 28677-2942
Telephone number: (704 ) 873-6761
4. ; Nance of closest downslope surface waters: Hunting Creel,
4.4 Cotutty(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located:Iredell
4.5 Map name and date:Harmonv. NC 1993
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate). Signature. and Date:
d��,�/-� f a
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located as identified on the attached map segmentt(s):
Name of surface waters: 7gtf vI
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):_j�)-S
Proposed classification. if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachmettts must be signed)
Dater ` &
L'n-DAlf. A xxln i` ATVI&IL7 — UXrD 1717Ina tb--- A ..rG

��'I�Z:i� �`� ��^�-����.�—�",;�� � I rls..4% ' �` ''� Y •� } � I _ r'dI �,�_ +(..�.-:,,• 4 `�I � ` �' � , •.
' - j �� .�-~al \ :ll s!� ",vs:;:.w��"�,.1. � _.._`. _ � t .' 1111 I i� �•�I P� ( - .�
r ;� ` u� [+��\\ I I ' �"_"..I _ ;t� ,c'�`iu"' �_' •—!. _ -ac� 4 1 f II ,r ! r'!/' � 11
�iYI
III ` ,x 7� �,.. { { If - \ - ! 1- •... — • f�' �„ _��
,`� y .v-_--�r � �''} Y��� •� { l _F�4� l �3 ��1 ! � I.7 II � � %�,�••,
a \� �,s �I � a �., �r 't _ :... �f, J;i "�,�-• _ -a _i "�� 1. SI h �-.'.,�.
1 I}L
'-H••,•. 1 �ac�„ l f. I �'.,1' �} �,�� —-,-:'�'.. .'� :•�:!'--';" I �'� �� �'� ,ts 11t2q�, �'t'' ,
I ''�j�.l—.� ryg 1 l I ;fir" �� i : �•. 5. I' r I J' / fil ,1 `�"'. '+ 4 `71
��"" � ( � I l.si �7IIs n. ^•-r ,L . ./''a'.--`.\ t � .:f� - r . f � _ � i � � I � � � ! f �� E ! 'a • !, \a
t �,.�. I i„',-�r_�e`, �.�-- 7` \iFZM1 t„F ` ,! !( �u _ / Tf�-� ,- ."J• 11.-� ,f�`''` r•.•:- :-,,:1
t "t j5 -,1-� � �''S�'�`-:3'�� �t .t �.:41 I �1 Yr'r J `' ✓ �._� �rtc tM1
-
'�'���. ! i t - --•-�ti 1,I ' u'? �/'• s t �- I y �II L! IIfir•]1 I f 1. 111,_ - i Lt ,v
'! J r .''�'{ y � Lam, ft,'��'{' �:?' � 111lr}II 1 t.� r il- y( ` �+� � �,_:� � rr � rf � i I ns � n "�•r� IY ^�.\
�s?>
--'- ��' ::r'f 1.. :� ��� , 'I I.._. L. � i \--i? \ -'1� I - r^t --r,.-r�r y�••.. 5 �I I' -I: -
� y' aLacfa ©alry' �,%� F1, L
�f- � �' ( ✓ f �+, \4r��! � ;;, �flr ,,,I
i- QLy- M , �r qhI`�" � � '-�. .���. 1'. �•\ I II i _.w7 r' +.• f (�.
�tl.
i_: —, ��` - �'.I _ ..:.��„ r.�~:�1 / ..�J I !- y �{^ }"i _ rr rr 1�1�11 �rll • .1•I_
J.
oi2a II 128}
f w
�• r� \ �1 �4� 1 } f � F a@ I I I•�
I /�`'; -�Y_ ` ,.. �''• { it
} Jare -urt\ ! '1
y Ltl _ c •rtj-I� y I;
v
v Ir. f, �,•' I c 't
Name: CALAHALN Location: 035' 57' 07.5" N 080° 43' 23.4" W
Date:4/1512002 Caption: Ladd Dairy
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 Feet Iredell County, North Carolina
n c,

o�oF w A
i
o �
Kenneth Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject:
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Ladd Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops gown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker' must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion:
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoontstorage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
ARM _
N-L�iJENR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely
Alan D. Johnson��f��`
Environmental Specialist Il
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

�..
�rA
O G9
sa �
James Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 30, 2001
Subject: Ladd Dairy, Site Inspection
Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April
24, 2001. Based on his observations made during the inspection the facility appeared to be
well maintained; and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report,
which shouid.be self-explanatory.
Be reminded that should waste be applied to a field whose crop has not been removed,
then the nitrogen applied must count towards the following crop. For example, in a small
grain/corn rotation, if 25 pounds of nitrogen is applied to small grain, but the small grain is
killed rather than removed from the field, then that 25 pounds must be deducted from any
additional nitrogen to be applied to the corn.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
lvacw
iDEhiR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ,Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 6 Time: v?�
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
© Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............. — .......
Farm Name:........,%l...S.................................................................. County:...... .......................... ............. .....
_..
OwnerName:- ..........���.e.7......... ,.............. ........................................ Phone No:.....,................................................................................
FacilityContact : ............ .................. ............................................ .... Title ..., ............................................................. Phone No:..----.............. ... ...........................
Mailing Address: ... ...S.-.Z1 ............... �s..... ttt� F�,� ...1.......................... ...... .....
�'��?C�f ?:f�Yl. .. .......................... �
OnsiteRepresentative: ............,r..�r......:-�.r-C...�.................................. Integrator:........, ..... ............ ............................. .......... ..... ..... .......
Certified Operator: �s`/ , Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude Longitude ��• �� �s
Design Current
awlne capacity actty ro ulanon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
oars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
(KLDairy I -Z Z
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Tota15SL V ,—.-----
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / SaI Tra s
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
P
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin'?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
?. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 4 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes CkNo
01/01/01 Continued

.............................................. . .....
[Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure"3 Structure 4
❑ Yes�No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .M ....N . ..... - .. �.. .... .. ...._. .� ... ..._......... .�� .... _ .... �_ -�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes] No
seepage, etc-) / \
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes -t`No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenatice/improvement? ❑ Yes E!rNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes -9[ No
Waste ARplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes RNo
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding []PAN [:]Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes &No
12. Crop type ('� r) ✓ vI _. 5'IPL K, // I .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes RNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes J;;LNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes 0 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes FalNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes �ffNo
17. Are r outcrops present?
❑ Yes ❑ No
18�,js-th ere a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑Unknown
❑ Yes ❑ No
'Re aired Records &Documents ❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ YesNa
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ,�] No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes 4�3 No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes C No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes (4� No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes �RNo
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes --No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ZNo
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes No
01/01/01
Continued

r
Faci ity Number: 1 Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the Iiguid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes VNo
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
0
Date: / G y -
01/01'/01

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
T NCDENR MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
:
WATER QUALITY SECTION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. September 11, 2000
GOVERNOR
James Ladd
-,-'BILL HOLMAN
' SgCR E,TARY
Lc
i
71
.e
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Ladd Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on September 6, 2000. Based on his observations during the inspection the facility
appeared to be well operated and maintain; and the files were complete. Please note
the comments on the enclosed inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely, f ...
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
z a a
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLE0110% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Con.Servation
0 other Agency
Type of Visit 45.Compliance inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation.
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Da to of Visi L: � �F' — - TimR:: •' Printed on: 7/2112000
Facility Nurnher
O Nest O erational O Below• Threshold
❑ Permitted ©Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
{ ... ...
FarmName: ...................1- .s .......... ............................................. Countv:.........s.�...>* f L� .....................
XOwner Name :............ . Phone No:
I+acilit-v Contact' .............................................................................. Title:..........................................,..................... Phone No:..................................................
..--
Mailing Address: .....��1..........j`+w.�....... Y4� Cam.. �cx.�!r Yt/k.�. i.�,�.....................................-•5�,��?. -11(..
Qnsite Representative-., .................. ........... �:................. ...... Inte+gyrator:
r....................................................
.................. ................
Certified Operator: ............. .... - ::.... 1 ,5.......... G .0 ............................. Operator Certification Number-1k.a.-L) .................
Lotffilo—n of'Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry U) Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �° C�.. Longitude C�• �+ L�«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Nan -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder �❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish i - Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE3 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag-u+n Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid 'Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Irrl_p
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Dis::harge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischartIc is observed. ww, the convuvance inan-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. li' dischari c is obscraed. what is the CSLim ueci now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lasToon system' (If yes, notify DW6) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation? ❑Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters 4the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freehoard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structur: I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ..............._...............................................................................................................................................................................,................
Freehoard (inches): -f6
Continued on back ,

[Facility Number: — Datc of Inspection Printed on: 7121120DD
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inucarity of :in\• of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ yes kNo
seepage,
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes .�.Na
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes. and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancchmprovement7 ❑ Yes 6No
9, Does anv part of the waste management system other than waste st: 1 Lures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ENo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
2No
A --rite :knnlication
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
W°
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
tO No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with dose designated in Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
J,Na
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
h) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended far a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
$1 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
KNo
Required Records & Documcnts
17. Pail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design. maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. xvaste analysis g soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
� No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a activelx certified operator in charge"
El Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
&
(ie/ discharge.. freeboard problems, over application)
❑
No
21 Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Sj No.
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
RZNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncomplianc: of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
e No
kl%
�: ?'Vo yio aiigzis . .clef c.. . . were i�r ed during tii'rs:�..... wi�1 i eeeiye o• further .
ctirres�oridence:abautth' visit_
Comments (refer to question + ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
iQ-s�rcLrvc
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Date: Y^ 4 '- oo 5101

Facility Number: Date of Iuspection Printed on: 7/2112000
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes RNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 9No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes KNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5I00

fl�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL, RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
.JAMEs B. HUNT JR. _
September 11, 2000
GOVERNOR
James Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
- BILL HOLMAN
I
Harmony, NC 28634
-SECRETARY
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Ladd Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on September 6, 2000. Based on his observations during the inspection the facility
appeared to be well operated and maintain; and the files were complete. Please note
the comments on the enclosed inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely, f .,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
S,
a
' I
n
Rt
918 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
M.
PFIONE70.4-663-1668 FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

G�Diivision of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit 45Zompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 9 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access I!
Date of v i%it; 'f eme: /d : �'CJ I Printed on, 7/21/2000
acility Number[--rl
, •,., _.� - O Not 4 erational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName : ................... A:7to-.4\1........... 4 1`........................................... County:......... lr £'.1`...........................,.........,.
.—
Owner Name: ��� lfl. . . .........L4._'.............................................. Phone No: ....... .... t 7ix?
FacilityContact:.......................................................................... Title:.............................................................. Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ..... S�Z\....... ....... R-Q x` .2 /
OnsiteRepresentative ................ �..r�...h!!.s.............t.- 4........................... Integrator:......................................................................................
4
Certified Operator: ............. ..� C� i ° �........ L-f� ...... Operator Certification Number.11 IZ4-�
. ................... ..................... ........
Lec5fi-o"n'of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Q Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �•°°+ Longitude �• ��«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capkeity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish 4 Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lag"rin Area ILI.Spray Field Area
No Liouid Waste Manasement Svstem
Discharg, & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed From any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discliarL>e is observed. slid it reach Walter of the State"? (If yes, notify DWQ)
C. II' discha1'2C is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/thin"
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No I
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters a the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [-]No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure: 2 Strt CLUrc , Structure 4 Structure 5 Siructure 6
Identifier: ..................................................................................................................................
.................................................
Freeboard (inches):
S/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: —
Date of Impection Printed on: 7/2112000
5. Are There any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
[] yes
RNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed.through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
MNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ym and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW Q)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
6o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
2No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers With required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
fNo
4i wdv tPplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Wo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
f� No
'� \
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t ose designated in e Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
J,No
14. a) Does the facility lack, adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
R.No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
iK No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
%No
Reguirecl Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps. etc.) ❑Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes X No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes g'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge' ❑ Yes L�No
22. Pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as requiredby General Permit?
Ge/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes & No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes 19 No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes OINo
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes g No
Io viaiafi nis;o4- ftfidenc#e5 •Were P4�t;et�•.00u ift xhis'visit: Yoit will teeeiye •no; fuxther :
ror'respondence.abirUt this visit ;
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
1Vt,eA Am 4n -� 1�c� -�e r'Vy� ,
,��ir0.M �11�Ct�v� 1S >►��uLet SOY�G
rr n
EAU
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: c"_r `�"~ " Date:

Facility Number: — Date of Ittspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odord ues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes RNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
A.
5/00

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Kenneth Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
IVA
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
r
!'d C. I?ki.l°T so
December 30, 1999 Of"RONNYENT, HyAL
■ NATi1RV�, k�hC3tli2Cil�
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-14
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

JAM:ES .B:-HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
V�a
6
;�-...�x''•h!' NORTH GAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 4, 1999
Kenneth Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Ladd Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
November 3, 1999. In general, the facility appeared to be in good shape. Regarding the
matter of obtaining a waste analysis, it is requested that you obtain a written response
from the Agricultural Extension Service or Regional Agronomist as to their willingness to
assist in sending the waste samples to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture's lab
in Raleigh for analysis. Please submit a copy of their response to Mr. Johnson by
December 1, 1999.
Please note that during many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some
farms are often missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available
for review. The following items must be available for review by the inspector during the
inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan which must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
f.17 C r>
rN a,e ew.rrn
7 0 1 0
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281IS
PHONE[phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AKFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

L 1-0
Page 2
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications should be made
during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be applied no
earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

Routine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number ��fC—j Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hb:mm)
0 Permitted Wertified [3 Conditionally `Certified © Registered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......... Nflh: 5.......... r- .......1 i4?'C ....... .. ........... County: .............. -- 1...............................I........
OwnerName: ............ .........�1.................................... ..,........ Phone No:........, ....".... .`f .......I.....................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Thane No:.......
.... S..........................................
Mailing Address:. i.. .....11?: k1 ..,. .......,.... ,o.'- !! .'.................................... ....:2. a—f
OnsiteRepresentative.......... I°k! ................... / ltI................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
�rLj e—,....................................................... p ? ..fied Operator:,,,,,,,,, j, Operator Certification Number:......,.. -...,` .
............
Certified
LwWion of Farm.
e ' 4 « Longitude ' 1
Number of Lagoons„ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holdingpitds 1 Solid �i'i'�as ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System >'
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [3 Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge; is observed, did it reach Water or the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min!
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? tg�pillway
Structure 1. Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure: 4 Structure 5
Identifier. -
Freeboard (inches): .... .......... 7---L.,...... ............I.........
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes t0l No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes kNo
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — !late of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-5 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
0
❑ Yes gizNo
Cl Yes ,61a
❑ Yes41KNo
❑ Yes t No
❑ Yes MLNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
1.4, a) Does the Facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19..Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21.. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
LINO yialatxpris oir def d6ncips mere noted• during •this'visit; • :Y:oir will i�eogiye Rio further' '
c©r es endence. abau this ,visit. .
Camments.,(reN.r. to cluesttan #) Explain any YES answers andlar any tecnri�tidendat�6tts ur any other somt teats.
.offacilx Q l)'ett t"ex alri ' t7atlons. Use addifi; 43is ti
Use, drawings ty:pn (_ na1 pages aesfy: t
❑ Yes fi�'No
❑ Yes EKNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes RNo,
❑ Yes J�kfilo
❑ Yes tNo
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes JJ No
❑ Yes PkNo
❑ Yes (,No
❑ Yes i] No
❑ Yes ,® No
❑ Yes ZQ No
❑ Yes 1�440
4,-J
yo"Y an
e-vxs 1'6 - c •e- vt.� 1
4140 V- r / �� �
`i ��a -t' �- �
A&
t_eX
tt
rho_ "a5
.SCE r+.�J l
Reviewer/Inspector Name "
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Date of laspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes /No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 4'No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes UNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems With the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes kNo
31. Do the animals teed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ YesNO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes�o
3/23/99

4me all p y 3
Ub;
T
lU\%/.�� \\\� ?
Wli
cp A N i. T
.ar
If
IN

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
115 cows are milked on the Ladd farm. Polluted runoff from feedlots
and lounging areas will be collected in a new waste storage pond.
Milking parlor waste will also be piped into this pond. The system
planned will economically as possible handle all the waste problems
present on the fro meet the'0200 state regulations. The waste
storage pond volume is the main factor which determines the
management which will be required to prevent an illegal discharge.
Therefore a six month period of storage is designed. The waste
storage pond is located over 100 feet from the nearest well and not
closer than 350 feet from any residence other than the owner. Where
clean water can be excluded from the feedlot the owners are
encouraged to do so by guttering and piping. Safety rail shall be
constructed at all push off ramps.
Livestock shall be fenced out of the waste storage pond. Fencing
will be changed to remove cattle from the draws and streams below
concentrated feed areas. These filter areas will infiltrate part of
the first flush an& filter sediment and organic particles. A stock
trail shall be constructed from the feedlot to the lounging area
located above the silos. The area downstream of the stock trail and
waste storage pond shall be maintained in a grass sod. This will
allow runoff from the silo to be filtered and will provide a place
for clean water to be diverted.
Waste application will be by irrigation and monthly spreading of
solids collected from day old-400 lb heifer lot and the lounging
barn. Application will be by waste analysis and soil testing.
Follow the irrigation plan developed by GRA-MAC IRRIGATION.
12

'd`
la
At
a�.V "�.'�.i �g%'i6✓ � R^ `,3`'.���w�y�..� � ate.. � » ::`�" _, .�'
�• tl � � d a/ ..e. tr. g'1:'+" kc `-: k Y a'�..e e1. ud ,,iirr''�+ '�°` z
„ s'"{". �za �'� . j�n 4 mac e3 } ✓ 9'+- . t� y.g4. a
a
w
,„ "&j.,Y•. E .G, �a. ti Y 'A?�; �✓' ri AIL, T W +�
1 j
�FLw� ��• ! `r-�r�r'"7 ,�4 :y w er. F..^Z..P r�$�"�y'i" �Y N-�`��. +Pr
sR
+ r=wllir
'
A
N"y 9 v. 4 � y �rf' r s� L r �+� '�.'a � 9� • ,� AU '� ` e:., �
��� �����[��„i.��y*�.�i, `a �"','�,,�� � }ti" .N � ," �. f f r��' 4 ^ 7 � / � Y �° ��' �+zy r� � ' r � _*`6'�,�� � ✓� "i
N P
Jp-
��i 4 j «�'�'-k:-'�" r'f .., .1•�;M yr,�,, ��r .�, � v Y X Y �'iw4"-id' w (,.• .� } r'r:i r, { �'+TY}cc��..
„4St 4 - '�' �1 »i ►v � �-.. r-r `� � ,.,1, ej'Y '�6•w"'�i . � 1^ .. ' w y F• � + �

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are
available for waste application. It will not be necessary and may not
be desirable to apply waste to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual
nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the
potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Hof N to be Applied per acre indicates the
Nitrogen that can be reasonably applied to the crop and used by the
crop in a timely manner using animal waste alone. It will not be
practical to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with animal
waste. Supplemental applications of commercial fertilizer may be
required during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient
needs. It is assumed that for certain row crops only a fraction of
the total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using animal
waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on.
each field on the Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record
Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field
application tables:
CROP
CODE
CROP
PRODUCTIN
UNITS
NITROGEN
REQUIREM'T
LBS./UNIT
CG
CORN - GRAIN
BUSHELS
1.13
CS
CORN - S I LAGE
TONS
11.0
HCS
HAY, COOL SEASON, NOT GRAZED
TONS
45
HGL
HAY, GRASS -LEGUME MIX, NOT GRAZED
TONS
20
HSG
HAY, SMALL GRAIN, NOT GRAZED
TONS
55
PCs
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
13.34
OG
OATS - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
1.15
TB
BURLEY TOBACCO
POUNDS
0.07
WG
WHEAT - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
2.05
L

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 1.: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be
No_ No_ Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Annlied2
5239
10
CgC2
PCs
7 aum
8
93
1080
5239
11
CfC2
CS
18 ton
22
198
1474
5239
11
CfC2
HSG
3 ton
22
165
1474
5239
12
CfC2
CS
18 ton
30
198
2010
5239
12
CfC2
HSG
3 ton
30
165
2010
5239
7
CfC2
CS
18 ton
20
198
32
TOTALS THIS TABLE
60
8080
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus
the required buffer areas which border streams or residential
areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most
likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources
such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 1: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl- Required to be
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Annlipd 2
5239
10
CgC2
PCs
7 aum
10
13
910
5239
11
CfC2
CS
18 ton
27
198
4752
5239
11
CfC2
WG
60 bu•
27
123
3321
5239
12
CfC2
CS
18 ton
35
198
6930
5239
12
CfC2
WS.
60 bu
35
123
4305
5239
7
CfC2
CS
18 ton
20
198
3960
TOTALS THIS TABLE
151
24178
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus
the required buffer areas which border streams or residential
areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most
likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources
such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
Ef

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANr) NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVII,, LE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
Kenneth Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Site ,Inspection
Ladd Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
IredeIl County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
.inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
010 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORIESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE 7g4.663-1680 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIAMATIVC ACTION EMPLOYER - 30% RECYCLE0/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPlR

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen M A
Mlication for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely tam around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soli pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste sam les/anal sis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to S) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 Feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this mutter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. F. j
i Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

c
A State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
I
fV)(�
1 AW-%ftoom"1%
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AN❑ NATURAL RESOURCES
MEMORANDUM V `
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
n
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
7
75 0'/b
0. r r
5?a-e_J gAewc,� I
"r-
at) nec.,cJ
cLk 0 G4`7 S/ 9 6
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27525-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment and Natural Resources 11
Division of Water Quality MAR 12 1998
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMlk�T�,''TER QUALITY SECTION
(INFORMATION REQUIRE]] FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A b0-EZi'-%tW }�nf
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
ct��r�.� ILnrie'
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): ,. r_� 1993
2. Facility No.: �7
3. Facility Name: CCk,
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Mailing Address:.
City: ��G,��_ r� i U State: N _C_ _ Zip: .D y 4, �5 tf{
Telephone No.: ("` ec b �5cJ(o_ `7 q '] (0
6. County where facility is located:—r,dt
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle), O.t• f` CtA le
8. Application Date: 3 — 1 3-
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal -waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
Iona as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
3-74
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 1 of 4

I Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include.
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Fundsexpended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
Iq 1'T�jc6G. -A- �,l `J 4�� bf R!ax P'ta�C'4YC.e5 L_4f:in L-'(4ica t'fi4CR-
�r
Q c 511
6: 5- 3n
\1CL 4SSe � .�
. ,..... Q �.LnSPec_�icN
FORM 5PAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

IL. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION :
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
— 1. - - , TeF'°c
.Applicant's Certification:
LcJcA , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC h� as been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required partof this application are not completed and if all
this facility is found to be ineligible to enter into_a special agreement with the EMC nothing in
this document removes my responsibility and liability for complying. with all North Carolina
ken,? L a -A ck --Tho rvLaS L-c dJ :�-e5 LcJ� .
fPrint Name Owner
`l� � -/ �>
Date - l-- I� LT
ignature of
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 3 of 4

-�df►iC�i �c�u
�-�L'LS�L S�Ct C�ct 71C7� coin lI 'C- Fa:6se"11al,le,i
�+1 S��GiafJ J CaP�
n e-ed +-D 60 5e e,(., 3 O r
I.. i0 C-2 4 r � l r i c�t5 b ee,�� Co nz � l e mod( .� C)
J
Cow s 4L e C CC P55 G 10r- 5
i L
CIIA (ICk..r-c un � - -te-J to + l c.5 b ee-Cori le4ed
t,O 1en o�radi�5 CDrnPle�eel fce
Grit', �-a us bee,J --!5 c �c� <� ue~
Prd" ecJ Cc rAp le�ed
���- 3 0 - q

CJe LC'i Y'f i GSLL� 4C i1 L J. f �/ti,� �•
f
Fe(rnti} j nd C ?-Ifr 5ka y C /-Lt
a1.tD
���
�� �
�� ��,��
�7n� l��ct�u1� ( �c�s•o� rc�s
�'on s'r'r ✓a�� a,J
Jam- L'� +�► [s°
��
�Y e�,I� f �
� a rc n !- � � cts � r1 �
� P_ S � � �S
why
�fd,LC�i- Q�Y[f�
i fyl4 k%, rt� Sc�%r �.
C.cLOf-d i n' T"Q
E r m
fIf-e. cz,�.1 t ; �.

Reguired Items
One (l) original and N,o C2) copies of the completed and appropriately executed
application form, along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORINIATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4

U.S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 1 of 6
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 20, 1998
Iredell County (Statesville Field Offi7e [phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Ladd, Dale
Business Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Business ID: laddda
Client Address
------------------------------
521 Foxhunter Rd
Harmony, NC
28634-
Client Phone Ext Description
704-546-2172 HOME
Business Address
------------------------------
521 Foxhunter Rd
Harmony, NC
28634-
Business Phone Ext Description
546-2172 BUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Plan Cover Note Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 04/19/97
Note:
Tract 5239 was revised to include practices needed to meet the 0200 rules
and regulations set by North Carolina. Practices needed will be used to
develop a NC Agricultural Cost Share Contract.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_---
Assistance Type: Plan Cover Note Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 04/15/97
Note:
Plan developed for the Waste Management System to meet North Carolina's
water quality 0200 rules and regulations. Cost share contract will also
be developed from this plan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 02/20/98
Note:
James Ray came by and requested the WUP revi.son as he wanted to apply
waste on other fields.

U.S.'DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 2,,of 6
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 20, 1998
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office [phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Ladd, Dale
Business Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Business ID: laddda
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 12/22/97
Note:
Request for reimbursement for dam construction as weather and cold
temperatures have stoped the work. Final construction check was made for
the dam and it does meet specification. Due to his plans to grade for
the new barn at his own cost he does need a place to put the dirt on the
back of the dam to reduce the slope and make it safer to mow. During the
grading rain and winter weather has stopped the work and contractor needs
his money. Pernmission given to submit request for cost share of only
the earth fill. Vegetation and concrete payment will be made later.
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: C01
Note:
Ladd's asked me to stake off the proposed ne
location. Rough grade stakes were installed
be made tomorrow as this area is lowered and
grade entrance and holding area 100 feet and
at 1% grade toward the pond.
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: 7CS
Assisted By: LLH
Date: 12/17/97
w parlor and freestall barn
and construction checks will
graded. Layout was for 3%
the barn location was graded
Assisted By: LLH
Date: 12/17/97
Note:
Work completed on the WSP. Construction check made and spillway and dam
are at proper heights with settlements added. All ramps are installed.
Three are to be cost shared and one is for future expansion and was paid
for by Ladd along with the lane of concrete above the WSP. Original
contract called for the scrape lane to tie directly into the old lane.
This was removed and is to be replaced at Ladd's expense. The clean water
storage pond was installed but the maximum effective depth could only be
2 feet as the loader was stuck. Will need to get a back hoe to complete
deepening to 5 feet as planned for flush out water. The waterway flowing
into the catch basin was installed and power tamped and inlet lid will be
installed later.

U.S.'DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office;[phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Ladd, Dale
Business Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Business ID: laddda
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: 7CS
Page 3 of 6
Feb 20, 1998
Assisted By: LLH
Date: 12/15/97
Note:
Request for cost share reimbursement made to Div. for stock trail.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: CF1 Date: 11/18/97
Note:
Did construction check on the WSP that is being constructed. Dam and
bottom elevations were checked. Pond not constructed to depth needed. Dam
height near the top. See check out notes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 07/03/97
Note:
Received letter of Div S & W Raleigh approval. Prepared plan with
specifications and notified Dale that he was approved and ready to start.
Will take specifications to him when we stake off for the WSP.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 06/19/97
Note:
Made changes and corrections as requested by Todd Kennedy and resubmitted
to him for final approval by Div of S&W.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 04/19/97
Note:
NCACSP contract developed and will be presented to the Iredell SWCD on
April 18, 1997.

U.S..DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Iredell County�(Statesville Field Office
Client Name: Ladd, Dale
Business Name: Rome Carl Ladd
Business ID: laddda
[phone]
Assistance Notes
& Sons Dairy
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: 7CS
Page 4 of 6
Feb 20, 1998
Assisted By: LLH
Date: 04/15/97
Note:
Wrote the 0200 management plan for contract preparation in FOGS.
-------------------------.,----_-___---------------------------------------___---_
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 03/10/97
Note.
Reviewed plan with Dale Ladd and he accepted and signed the waste
utilization plan and provided lease agreement on rental land. Said he
would sign the acceptance of approved plan when cost share contract was
discussed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 03/06/97
Note:
Began the development of WUP and soils information to send to Gra-Mac
irrigation as they need to complete the design before March 15, 1997.
--------------------------------------------------W------------W--------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: RHB
Fund ID: FSA Date: 02/20/97
Note:
Tract 5288 has been transferred to the current owners Dean and Martha
Boger.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical. Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 01/22/97
Note:
Met at barn and discussed the need for 0200 plan and options. NRCS
employees involved were Sam Bingham, L. Hendrix and Renessa Brown.

U.S.-DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 5 of 6
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 20, 1998
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office [phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Ladd, Dale
Business Name: Rome Carl. Ladd & Sons Dairy
Business ID: laddda
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: COI
Assisted By: LLH
Date: 11/14/96
Note:
Today I met with Dale, Tommy and Carl Jr. Ladd and Sam Bingham and
Renessa Hardy to discuss the waste mgt plan for 0200 certification. Area
identified to survey and discussed possible alternatives. No decision
could be made until drainage areas were .identified. Ladds need to decide
on the method of hauling or irrigating waste. Survey will be scheduled
soon and Ladds will be notified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: PKW
Fund ID: FSA Date: 06/05/96
Note:
STATUS REVIEW FORM NRCS-CPA-18
Admin. State & County Loc. State & County
Tract Number
37097 37097 5239
New Tract Number Cat. of Status Review
Producer Name
R Ladd, Dale
Total Hours Spent on Status Review Status
Review Date
3 06/03/1996
Reviewer Initials Crop Year
PKW 96
----Erosion Data ---If Crop
Bef Af Residue P Y
Field
F1d LU
FSA
FS
Cur ACS
planned
-----Wet -------
Num(s) Acres Det Cd
TV Rt
Rt Rt Rt
pin
act
L N Acre Lbl Dt
1
13.5 ND OT
Y
0.0 N
Practice
Codes:
FIELD
Dter: NN
11
13.0 HEL
C 4
7 4 4
5
30
60 P Y
0.0 N
Practice
Codes: 329
344
FIELD
Dter: UA
12
61.7 HEL
C 4
7 4 4
5
30
60 P Y
0.0 N
Practice
Codes: 329
344
FIELD
Dter: UA
2
23.7 ND
OT
Y
0.0 N
Practice
Codes:
FIELD
Dter: NN
3
5.0 NHEL
OT
Y
0.0 N
Practice
Codes:
FIELD
Dter:.NN
5
9.8 HEL
C 4
7 4 4
5
30
30 P Y
0.0 N

. j
U.S.-DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office [phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Ladd, Dale
Business Name: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Business ID: laddda
Page 6 of 6
Feb 20, 1998
Practice
Codes: 329
344
FIELD
Dter: UA
7
18.4 HEL
C 4 17 7 4
5 30 30 P Y
0.0 N
Practice
Codes: 329
344 386 412
FIELD
Dter: UA
9
15.9 HEL
C 4 15 7 4
5 Y
0.0 N
Practice
Codes: 328
510
FIELD
Dter: UA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: FSA Date: 06/19/95
Note:
Status Review 1995, (UA) Actively Using Practices. Completed by Perry
Wilkerson.

- ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ADivision of Water Quality
Routine O (:►>nt laint O F olln)w-u c►f DW( ins cation O Follow-up of DSW C review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
I Time of Inspection lrft 24 hr. (hh:mm)
'Registered © Certified © Applied for Permit C( Permitted 3 Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:..R vw: .......cG.-A....... .. ......... County:..... -re .£'...1.......................-1...................,
OwnerName: ...... .....F.tk� i...........>............................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................. Phone No:... / ...........
Mailing:address:...... V..� .............. e�........1'fs✓73tra...............................(................................................ n?.cf��.� ,....
Onsite Representative............ ............ integrator% ...................... .................................. .............................
Certified Operator •...... ............... . 4�.da........................ Operator Certification Number:...I..�fZ C�
............
Location of Farm:
.. .... ....... .......` t01................................. L z...., ...... .p..t.... ...........Ts:x%_st
e ............
�` N. �,;.... a n.. ..�....�I �i
........ fin r�
.... t.� ..t�
'�. .... 1..`d.. .C..
YM..
f ..�:I,..7.. l . e 1• r I �cc
,, r:s.,.7.,
l 673 �* ��
.��aa ArvVt
h.'R !_G7'f ._i._ w�:• .jrw.
Design , Current
Design Current ...:..:Design
. Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
IM7Dairy
25-0
ElFeeder to Finish
Nan -Layer
❑ Nan -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
S—v
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
O 4a"o
Number of Lagoons / Holding. Ponds �, ILl Subsurface Drains Present lLj Lagoon Area Jp Spray Field area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notif)v DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Row in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenancef improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
9Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ Yes
9( No
❑ Yes 1,No
❑ Yes C2kNa
Continued on back

CN'uciIi'tN.r: —
8. Are there lagoow; or storagge ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑Yes �4No
S.tructures +Lagoons,11olding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft). .......,f{v! ................
Structure 2 Structure 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'?
❑ Yes kNo
Structure 4 Structure 7 Structure 6
I L. Is erosion, or anv other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Ye.
XNo
Ayes
0
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes A\o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .....l..f ....fix. f 1�.................. .................. ,................... ............ ............. ................................................ .................... .............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWIvIP)? ❑ Yes kNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ No violations or deficiencies. were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this. visit. .
❑ Yes k..NO
❑ Yes oi(Vo
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes KNIo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes DZNo
❑ Yes ^No
❑ Yes fkNo
❑ Yes f .No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any othercomments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�.s bet, �7"f
7'p
_P r`1
,r - L a .45 r"""A � l'r Cjb Hr,_ Ut kej j;c>'r rLOLti C
it,e_ �frv*N etc." 6C. l �.V'-���-+ C�C1` qOr MCrX �W��,.t�,Z C�CiL� � .
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspectiir Signature: /� �,�.. ,� � Date: —2 -- j

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Kenneth Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd
Harmony NC, 28634
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NPruRAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1999
t";.rm,.�.�"'i.?fir
s"1F 3�.iiP 1 fl-T..'
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Facility Number: 49-14
Iredell County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on March 12, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Kenneth Ladd in
order to allow additional time for Kenneth Ladd to obtain and implement a certified animal waste
management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina !General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

r
Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File ; Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
MHORegional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-14
KENNETH LADD
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Kenneth Ladd, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-14
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER'S" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

3
Farm Number: 49-14
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

I State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 17, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Kenneth Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd
Harmony NC 28634
lkf?WA
4,a��
�A�r�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA pEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Facility Number: 49-14
Iredell County
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on March 12, 1998, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Kenneth Ladd in order to allow
additional time for Kenneth Ladd to obtain and implement a certified animal waste management
plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SO% recycle&10% post -consumer paper

Ii
Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 571or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Comphance/Enforcement Unit
DWt,Q Regional Office:
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-14
KENNETH LADD
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G. S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Kenneth Ladd, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 14313-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works; but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER' is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission asset forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph l(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30,1998.

Farm Number: 49-14
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (a) (1) (E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-14
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
S. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

r
s� NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF'
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
NCDEHR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
JAMES B. HUNTJR March 2, 1998
.GoYERNOR ij
Kenneth Ladd
k' Rt. 1 Box 264
Harmony, NC 28634
vir►YNE McDEYIT'i Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
-_$>wcR6TARY Site Inspection Report
Ladd Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
j r Dear Mr. Ladd:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 18, 1998 by Mr. Alan
Johnson of this Office. You should be sure that the certified plan establishes the maximum
number of animals that you plan to house at the facility. In addition, all fields that you
plan to use for the land application of waste should be included in the waste utilization
=h plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2911 S
PHONE [phone] PAX 704-663-9040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- SO% RECYCLE13/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3Other Agency
aDivision of Water Quality
-1011ourtne OCont pfaint OFffilb��-tt OrDWQins pectkm 4D,�Vollow-upofl)SWCreview 00ther
E Facility Nu�mber D I ate of Inspection
1
,,me of Inspection 24 lir. (hh.-m
A
ORegistered 13 Certified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Lisi Operated: ...........................
x
'�ame: .Uv.u, ........... ............................. y ............... .......... ............
Farnij ....... County:......:. u n t
Owne'r Same . ..... ........... . .................. I ............... Phone No: .......................................................................................
FacilityContacf: ............................ ................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone NO: ..... 7.� ...........
Mailing Address: ............. .......... .................
A
Onsite Ikepresentative ............ ........... J_..GJ.A ...............
Certift ,pd Operator ...............
Location of Farm:
Boars
................................. ....... ..
Integrator: ......................................................................................
......... Operator Certification Number..._�_.!..q.
....ZS
77
A
c ...........
'k .... e_. FC- J
r -77 -7 --,I* r =-., r ­F7,.
i.tion .,Panl0j:....
Total tAl Design C
Total
JE1 Subsurface Drains Present:] 10 Spray Fie
-.N ej�,'-DfLagoons I H Iding Ponds, Lagoon Area Id Area
.. ..... . .. . ....
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
.. ......... ......
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 9yes El No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes l No
Discharge ori-inatod at: El Lagoon [I Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, l(discharge is observed, did itreaoh Surface Water? (If yes notify DWq) 0 Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaYmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) rl Yes ❑ No
3. Is there,evjdMce of pasi discharge frora'any part of the opdration?..
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than fiom a d1scbar'9e? ❑ Ya N' 0
5. Does any part of the waste rnanaggeinOht �ykein (oth6i than lagobins/614ng ponds) 'requ' ii�e Elyef
9 N6
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes 1ANo
[
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge ? L1 Yes%No
7/25/97 ti ­N
Continued on back
, j 41

[Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponces on site which need to be properly; closed'?
Structures (Lag oons,tiol ding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than.adequateT
irnlc=tore 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes t]Cl No
❑ Yes No
.structure 5 Structure 6
Iilentifer: /
Freeboard(ft):.........10........................................................................................................................ ............... ........................................ I..................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes KNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? Yes M51110
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? VYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
Waste 2kpplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15: Crop type ; i.k ......r .... e"r �. ZA................... ...
..................................... .............................................................
15. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does..the receiving crop need improvement?
r..- NIj
19.' Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
.0..
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
' 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
0 No.violat ons or deficiencies. were noted during this visit. Vou.will receive no further
coriispondeke about this visit:
❑ Yes l klllo
❑ Yes bulu No
❑ Yes )K1No
❑ Yes k.No
❑ Yes i4k
❑ Yes �j[No
❑ Yes k_No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes �ZNo
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes LkNo
❑ Yes f MI No

if WOW
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE VESTED
Kenneth Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
1 • "1
�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOLIRGES
February 11, 1998
rie
& a}rATU..AL ,
FEB 5 1990
�1<f��',�,� �i F�S�i�'�_�$�r�rl?t .-�r•e,..; r
th�.�"UE hi1tu"AL 0}riCE.,t�
Subject: Request for Status Up,�a��
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Facility Number: 49-14
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter,
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that mast be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the. threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30.000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address;
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997, Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard.
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Al'Curmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Kenneth Ladd
496 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony, North Carolina 28634
Dear Mr. Ladd,
ATW"5WA
E:3aHNF:;Z
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Facility No. 49-14
Iredell County
On July 10, an Operation Review was conducted of Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy, facility no. 49-14. This
Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, dairy parlor wastewater was observed discharging from a pipe into a ditch that reaches
the local branch. Since it is illegal to discharge animal waste into waters of the State, your operation along with
supporting documentation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further investigation and possible
enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify Division of Water Quality and the owner/operator of
this observed violation.
As discussed during the Review, it is imperative that this discharge is eliminated as soon as possible. You
are strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help. You may also want to contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District Office since they may be able to provide you with additional technical
and/or financial assistance to implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental regulations, animal
waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified
operator.
Also remember that all registered livestock operations are required to obtain and implement an approved
animal waste management plan by the end of this year, and to gain certification as a animal waste system operator.
The animal waste management plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer, For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information.
919 North Main Street, �� yC FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 5C%o recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Kenneth Ladd
July 16,1997
Page 2
cc: Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources +
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary C) � �. � F1
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman V
November 6, 1997 X.N.vt � ( )r: ",I I'll- �� T,
Kenneth D. Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Road NOV 1. 947
Harmony NC 28634
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Dear Mr. Ladd:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919l515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System operators Certification Commission
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r - AS
In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. 'This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/bethianimalwaste/tempcertfollowup
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
James Ladd
496 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Ladd:
A-;,
lDEHNR
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
FEBRUARY 12, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Ladd and Sons Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on February 6, 1997 by
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental laws and regulations.
It was observed that there is currently no lagoon system in place. Mr. Johnson said you informed him
that a farm plan is being developed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS). Be advised
of the importance of having a certified plan by January 1, 1998. By this deadline, the facility must be in
compliance with all state guidelines. No discharge of waste was observed entering the stream below
the facility during the inspection.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. If you
have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, Nf
�y� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal' FAX
Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 :.,_, 50% recycied/10% post -consumer paper

FarmName: ... . ...... . ....... . ... ...... d✓J �: ._....I �L..,...... County:....... �� '� �'.��,................. ............... .........
wger Name: ,....- .... w.. L............. -.... .._....._...................... Phone No:...,,51.-.......raF......-.....w.....
- .......
-..
6.5
Mailing ......j r �........ .._.... - ........ .....2.
I R...
r' \
Onsite Representative:...........J..tS::k4 �...............-...L�. !.fir ....................... Integrator: ��..iG71.L11/k �.......,.�lt� ...........CC�l�ci��.
Certified Operator: _... f�' ..... t.f1- ....,.,..�..._ . ....... ..................... Operator Certification Number: » ................................. ......
Location of Firm:
.... ...................................................is ...-...... ....... .t....... , ...... .. LG ... 1C ............................... 4
.. �........._._... .. v� ... _. ...:. Z 1ft Qk ............. . -...._........................ ................ .... ................... . ...... a
Latitude �` �� 0 u Longitude ' 6 if
J.[3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..... ............. ......... � ........ _ .. _....-........_...... ........ _............
,.............
Type of Operation and Design Capacity`
pj
Swine Number
,*,Poultry,. Numbers"
Cattle
Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
airy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -La er
❑ Beef
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Teeder
Farrow to Finish
�.❑ UtherType of Livestock
Number of Lagoons ( Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drams Present
y
=3 ,' ID Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
- —
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
2 Yes -'No
0 Yes . ([No
❑ Yes J' No
El Yes � No
IYes No
❑ Yes JA No
❑ Yes qNo
KYes ❑ No
Continued on buck

. r
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes R NS
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/i/97)? ❑ Yes %No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes PNo
Structures ffiatzoons and/or Holding Ponds AJ/P
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? / ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (fi): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Anplleatlnn
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ._.....�fi. Y... .. ........ ........... ........................... ......... ...,.............
I6. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or 'any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. `(use additional,pages as necessary] LL
... ;.
�ylb
t �tfc/ 40 Cam. 1 0."I
IVY 442— i �;enV`KS. tr'u K'trC � i� 5 [ i5 '� C b
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes No
J4 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'>Ct.fAOr {� VKC.v -V-e- PP
i 5 g CcC`0. CCL ?b_ `0 C _t&V_ \�C�`gt0
ath & �e� ka SA ra P4 r1 t++ �-�cx � 5 „�� irLe G-r-L c f S�+ CJL� Uc_
I�QIt'tY 1� V c Lt t-5 . �.V�� 1'.r.� C'1 { 1O 7,5 4 6�t1eA c.,,r' _c-1...,Y (5
_. i _ P t C _ _ .E _. _ .tl t r _ /1 _ r t . _ 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name 6
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: t Date:
ce. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14196

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ATAW*SIWIJ
Mooresville Regional Office A
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 1DEiHNF;Z
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Kenneth Ladd
Rt. 1 Box 264
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Ladd Dairy, Facility #: 49-14
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Ladd:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be Implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently Identified.
919 North Main street, V FAX [phone]
NV; Mooresville, North. Carolina 28115C An Equal Opportunity/A'frmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
Water Quali egional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Kenneth Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
496 Fox Hunter Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Mr. Ladd:
[DaHNF;Z
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Facility ID #: 49-14
Iredell County
DEC
D1V1Silili OF
MU[1LSI igE Cii e ss � �r iu
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21,1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
/Zt'�
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System N��C Volce 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certff catlon Commission An Equal Opportunity/Aiflrmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Ralelgh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ I (Y% post -consumer paper

0�0�, W A'Zl Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. FRoss'Jr., Secretary
North CarollnWl'epa; , erit of t'rjyiroririei pnd iVatural Resources
nek, P.E., Director
' Division of Water Quality
May 30, 2003 JUN 0 4 2003
Kenneth Ladd
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony NC 28634
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No, AWC490014
Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Kenneth Ladd:
In accordance with your'application received on August -13, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Kenneth Ladd, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist
of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Rome Carl
Ladd & Sons Dairy Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater than annual average
of 300 Milk Cows, 50 Dry Cows, 200 Heifers, and 50 Calves and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the
required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future
samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will
need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to. comply with all applicable laws,
rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this
permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation
to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any
wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the
CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through
143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General
Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit intemet hftp://h2D.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Cancer, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal opportunity Action Employer 50%v recycled/10% post -consumer paper

This COC is not automatically transferable. A ,.rrowilership change application must be submitted to the
Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. +
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for
an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a
request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office, Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J. R. 3oshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
vile Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Heath Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490014
NDPU Files

In -al- o0
C C�GtiY Le.Ulo� SnnS'
rod \A,,'i�
A�}cn'ton o N C F. N R
�r\ response. io -*1 le'Aec sent on
are. amw er s Ao dour c�veslr on s .
1�1on N c— I;pr&3C/
Mop 3 \ . and o -lone. �olkovai ns
1. Our syccAoMs� is �arr� IAeMv ti X lrede lI
So % ` and Water . lake wt % tt be send irv� Aou 0'. reV i 58 C-OT`A
o4 our v Aaste Lk:�'t t i aa� on ?tan A-o cormc-c t1le nu mwer
o� Oln%TrAkS o+n oLI( 'Farrah..
copies 04 our WoLste LAi li=-W5n Pin (nave 0ire"!3
been sen4 -�o '--tau.. Tease. ce. er A-o your Cop4es .fie.
plan Vnas r\4 chanosed . Atn;moal waste is ap,pV►e-d `klt)
smalk Ovain , raSS i and Coe r\ , one. s"t; gM in Vqa
har v e s�k e�d for • �C�'nere a-�te c , Soybcoacls vt ece+
►n the Px end . 'hem
AS v; V'c 160S an•rnal via e a4p
*ko s xt\ Jac so•\. 'Please note : �� Wks tvo D\V.E-C;v
r r AST E 'ra -VAS Soy Se w 5 i ana
�}pPL1G�t''Ctot� op. �Nt�L W � the; spy�nS. �•s
no tr'Irher •�er�� 1�Zer Was o�+dd `�, � ©n- s�'te inns on
rtas ety*dined to ' �uYlnarn dv�r�na� N 0"\►rn's s� e
3 -- ael - 0c). ?lease re r 'pro c Copy ci no v i6kawons aj ilne.
ins on arrd �e *VA Y� observed
-1-ivfve o� w"S �5r
13 . Tease Vc. cf -k-o X-e4erexu.e s : ru ludcd '%Vn *\e. )gage.
es l b �-1�1 ►n '�lne Vaaste Lj- Alza�ton Ytan .
. Tease resirer -to ?O' • �'on arc h lash Col�r�n on
`Che rctioc�rhs oar ap4;xcu

/ :6,'
Facility Number ) d,r Date of Inspection y�_ = Ito
__ - - ..] Time: of Inspection I 13 : n ED 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........ ............. '?: '..!....... ! 1✓ ...f........ ':r;� ...... :.ray..... county: .........�r�..::X .......... I.............. !:} eu.......
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:...... :�...... .......................................................
FacilityContact: ......... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address,
OnsiteRepresentative:......:.'! f.7..........E :.............. ............................., Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:,.....s :.h.� 5............('.2 ........................ fh.t :�..................... Operator Certification Number:.....Z.1..4/20..............
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 6 " Longitude • L «
U^•�� t<a achy ;lro .uta.rton:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design. Current
pgsti
Current
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Ca aci
'.Po elation
❑ Layer
Dairy 1
2—
i Iurnbeol`i.a�►tn i y ',i; ❑❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area [I Spray Field Area
Holding I'otids / SvlitbTt'At7' No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacks
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made'?
b. Irdischarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (Ifyes, nt)tif'y DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? to Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
El Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes El No
El Yes El No
El Yes .9 No
❑ Yes 1j No
❑ Yes 5d No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............. 9.............. ................................................. .................
5. Are there any Immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes W No
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued an back

Facility Number: 119 - f Date of inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes R No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JR No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require rnaintenancehmprovement? ❑ Yes 1A No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Anolication
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
1 I. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Reauired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? Afjrl ❑ Yes ❑ No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 5d Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 52 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes §4 No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [] Yes 0 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector tail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes fR No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 5d No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes IR No
0' Rio �+i�la I rjs'a�' Cien..e v.. .note it ririg t�tis:viS Yo>ix iviIi l�ec ive Ito fp>�th�r : .
. • corres onci�eitce: a�otit: thi'is .visit.. • ... .... . • .... .
GainixteMs frof*~x to question #� Explain any YES,answers and/ar apy conamenda#ivns or y oihet
csrtaeanaienf.
(
Use draWtI of faciliyty to . beiter ex lain situations. use additional Pages as necessary}
� �� i�:;•,=; �• ���.-,�f,: fir::: = j�" ��, l� iy. r' � :� �� t��.�� . !-f' t�y� �t�;�.�pn.'
44 K 1"i1ti S IV #7 :::. •s.' !::} f -�� .. J, '.N'�- f� � ftl r;� '_'• �!1 ref% r i.�.-'l.' �i.r f,-. ! �L. rr 4 . L' C .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
. .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: - ?/Y'-01 x�'am; �
3/23/99

Facility Number: � G -W 1�
Date (if Inspection
Odor Issues '
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30,
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
C@ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
ElYes
ElNo
3/23199

United States Natural
Q1,R)
Department of ResourcesAgriculture Conservation
Service
NC-CPA-17
s, REV. 1, 2-96
I
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
NAME & e• L dd ,.r
jj
.f a x fan of
�►w 1a & a- i ..
TELEPHONE 70"f - Sit(. - .2/ 7 Z
LOCATION IBCe // G aw�'Zitr
SIZE OPERATION e,dw z
DISTANCE FROM,iEAREsr RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER /&O & FT.
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACILITY (sdwol. chinch, etc.) ?' LKO w FT;
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?
YES NO ✓
If ycs, MRCS cannot provide assistants.
is SITE AT LEAST wo FT. FROM A" BLUE LINE" PlsRENNIAL STREAM?
YES NO
If no. site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN I MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPAL TW
YES— NO �
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtaided prior to design approval.
ARE urmmES IN CONSTRUCTION ARIA?
YES .. NO
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR. ANY NON -CROPLAND? YES— NO ✓
If yes, producer most complete Form MRCS-CPA48 (Request for Certified
Wetland Determinatlon/Dellneadouj
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES,,,,_ NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF
ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMIIYE IF PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED. THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY LAND UNTIL A WETLAND DELINEATION .
IS MADE.
MRCS will provide technical assistance• in wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland
Inclusions less than one acre In size, MRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values lost are fully
mitigated. For natural wetlands greater than one acre'la size. MRCS will provide assistants only after a
rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimization of Impacts, and compensatory mitigation is
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL SEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER:
• PREDOMINANT WIND D(RECTION? YES P,-- NO _
• PRECHARGING LAGOON "FRESH WATER 0 AT LEAN 1/2 YES NO N/O'
OFTHECAPACrrY? Wrt1t� 5YV-'�r /'"i.)4. .
• USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT iN LAND APPLICATION YES ✓ NO
OF WASTE?

NC-CPA-17
REV, 1, 2.96
Page 2
N
OTHER EYv1RONKENT`A.L FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT? YES NO ✓
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AREA OR
WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL. SCENIC AREA? YES NO
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED AREA? YES � NO
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT FARMLANDS IN THE YES ✓ NO _
OPERATING UNIT?
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODSUSTING? YES NO
If the answer to any of the above is yea, NRCS will not provide technical
assistance unless Meng policyis followed
WASTE MANAGE.M&N T
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY ALL WAS M YES L NO
INCLUDING SLUDGE. ALTHOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED U*7EQUMMY7
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? &'/&9 YES NO
IF IAft IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER (LET AGREEMENT ON LAND YES . NO _
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE?
(Attach Waste Utalution Plan to site evaivation.)
SOIL PME.MGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOII. LNVF.SITGATION
SIMET ATTACEMD
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR L-&000 T7 kV 5P
YE8 ✓
NO,,,-,,,,„•,
IS A LINER REQUHUM?
YES
NO —
TYPE OF LINER. TO BE USED:
CLAY 1� BENT oNTTE - _ sYNTili c _
IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON
YES ✓
NO _
STIE7
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE
YES—
NO _ _ W A
ACCESS TO CLAY?
iS A CORE TRENCH REQUIREW
YES ✓
NO
(Attach sail investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT?
YES—
NO
(If yes, tile must be removed or plugged)
SITE APPROVED YES NO _ CONDITIONAL_
COMMENTS
THIS SITE INIMT(GATION IS VALID FOR TWELVE MONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRUCTION
HAS NOT BEEN STARTED WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS, A NEW SITE INVESTIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED. Y
SIGNATURE ;� DATE
F Changes in the local or state law or changes in the standard could require a new site investigation.

r
Evaluation of Soils for Use in Dam Construction
Rome Ladd Farm
By: Sam Bingham, Civil Engineer, NRCS
A bathtub style clay liner will be constructed in the
waste storage pond embankment (ie see design drawings.)
NRCS will check the depth prior to backfill. All trenches
shall be dewatered prior to placing earth fill. Any organic
layers on the foundation surface shall be removed to placing
earth fill.
All alluvial material suitable for use in the dam
construction must be placed in downstream slope of dam. Any
material with rock greater than 6" in size shall be wasted
outside the embankment on the downstream toe of the dam or
rock shall be sorted from the fill material prior to use.
Clay material (MH, SC, or CL) shall be used for clay
liner construction.
COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS
Maximum thickness of layer before compaction is 8" or
less. Compaction is equivalent to or better than the
following. A sheeps foot roller shall be used for
compaction. At least 6 passes shall be made over each lift.
The clay liner material shall be placed at optium plus 2t
moisture content.

■■■■■■■o■■N■ ■■■ ■1■■■■■1■■
■
■
■
■
mom
m■■■■■ ■
■■■■■■v"ImmysEw"A
■
I&Mo ©Ir ao R3a 'o is m MIEl 3 m o m1m:M d !o ®�M'
mm
miumm son WoUmmu"NEWEEN
mmolmilm ME MEMO RE so ME 0 KENN
"i■it.IiPIN ■■■■■■;■,■■■■■:■■'■■"11,

TYPES OF MATERIAL EWOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Usr oar• of symems below) =�
-. _ IINIf1F.0 CLAS.SIFICAT1faN
I �USnA CL.ASSIFICATI
GW -Well tttaded xmvels: gravel. sand mix
GP - P(riv graded Rrxvels
GM -Silty 0r sails; graver xwnd-silt mire
GC -Clayey gravels: gravel -sand -clay mix
g-gravel
i u -sand
vies -very fine send
at • sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands: sand-Rravel mix
fal - fine sandy Iaent
SP - Poorly graded sands
SM - Silty sand
SC -Clayey sends: sand -dell Wow-
ML • Silts: silty, v. fine sand&. sandy of clavey site
I - Iwm
=I - gravelly loam
si - silt
ail -silt loam
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
cl-clay least
CH•Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sici-silty clay loop;
MH - Elastic silts
GL'-organic silt$ andsilty days. low Pleaticity
sel -sandy clay loam
sic -silty clay
OH -organic clays, medium to high Plasticity
c-clay --
L suitable material for embankment to available
mow► a a16►
YM O Ne 1JY a.M wirwr r.rww■ .w M. eR �w
eo
L Ssplain hasmrda'ngwrinm nmwi.d attention fa deauto NcJ
A loirrMw Qy to
hyl arm
GZNERAI. RE1Vf &M:
24
25.
W
27
29
aft 81
31
35 X_
,il
U
39 �
41
U
42144146
U
471,0149150
51
I
a

17_1 Ii� i� , - Tr..._ i 'I�fr , •`:" ~� ,rr+r } jr r
ro -.S {��� `t�( , I ai ,in- llb1� .���' ���t( r(r''} �rK ' �1."Y •�.': { li.
�' � 'k�i� ,'II• kl�t 1 �r't 1� `' � � u� ` ` �' �J' '`'�'yll I ,'�il 1! �.•ll � �(�4
AX
IF
•��:,�Ill� i ' i /•;: '1{Ill I �. rY� ( , i-/f, =1! ( a J�
''-----'�1 � �; � � ' � �' _ •'ter r. 1,,..5�� ri � '' �� � ; )•,t � 4 r !-. t, i 5 i a rt � (�
� ��' , - ..;• E r .�_��� I1� t9i) t �-"-t ,u� �� ` �_`��� a' Ii ?I}i(• f�--�yCL
:�, •�' �'�i; _ � x+
of Q
ta
` `,= cxn+ ,0111_ � 'f( } .•fr �.� ` �, ((�+ 5` �'J'� i �J-��� �.rl 'I% '' �� - � 1,
. ` _- l r',q1 � if I{',1%i ��' •+ � _ 1~.i— .S�` .:��F ,�il!.-.\`, �.
. �:1 's� ; � ,,.- : ' ` `� - `���' _ 0 �• y ` 1 1, �� i . :` .
j l' �' � .,i:i•\ !( C` fir': ,! [({_'• �,:Y,, 1. )' =� �)} ,r �11 t
if
�i coos ����_ --- •tip: E.
/fj is ,r Ilr•�I, ! �S 15�•0_ �' 't`` rj /�_' �`' � j� �`,1 } r} _TffJ '���_ /y`/} s I� �' j 1.� �_ : f
ey
D Ai
41
- � Z k ' �. VI m .. ll n' r is ��1 �I 1 •. 71 '#� i I i � � 1 _'rf t � y��' {' 'i%:� Ir
`y.LS_ r �� �`^�� -i'_ t !�v . ,•JT x - ' II r r. �(1 - i l i
' _\�� .i 1. rl �\'4li, F. � .�' Or'a /h is��i7 U tt'S, •t {'�` � ; � •.I(; f 1�15-'' I ��' `, •fj� .
` � _. - .I ... - .(t(f,• II � rf({ f 5 .'�`. =� � \�\��r�-{{ r' )/ J ;�' ''il! �:` r .
- �\ ',;k' 4,••,'�'r .,i�;• ., � .;J { 11� L!I r>r�� \1N,•�r,a. )urFir,/i/ _.,� I
- -, .� — -�----1�. 4;,�(l `''1 " r�� �(r •'I .��. ��% � '��,� 1i` :',��j i�y �� ( `'�'"��J���� ���Jn;` �`j��'1' a�..�''.

ervation Service
September 1980
File Code: 210
-.HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR P.MS
Landowner o County
Community or Croup No. Conservation Plan No.■ -
Estimated Depth of Water,to Top of Dam II Ft. Length of Flood Pool 24,o Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation -2 T •
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est.-Elev. Mt.
eva ion
:....
; ..
:
'Kind of :'Improvements:
'of Breach
Reach: Length:
Width:
Slope:
Land Use
Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
t. .:.
Ft.
Ft.
Ft.
2 • D �ODt. - .. •
• •
f ��3 �� �.
Describe potential for loss of life
improvements from a sudden breach_
damage to existing or probable future downstream
Hazard Classification of Dam O b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)_ a
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V) 6 Io
Jl0AYt►., vvx
Concurred B
[Lug t*
Date De_9(
y SU (.zs�-cam Date 02r— 0 9
me tI e
1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.

n
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, Part II, must be included with this application
prior to the application being accepted as complete,
Application Date:
<THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE FILLED OUT USING
THE i k B KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS
1. GENERAL .INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Kenneth Ladd
1.3 Mailing address: 521 Fox Hunter Road
City: Harmony State: NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number: [phone]
1.4 County where farm is located: Iredell
1.5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Harmony go East on HWY NC 901 to left on
Sheffield road, to Right on Dyson Road, then left on Fox Hunter Road, go to 52I Fox Hunter Road.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No:49-14.
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals
p Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: _
FORM: AWO-G- NEW or EXP. 7/7/99
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Layer g Dairy 600
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Turkey
No. ofAnirriiils:
E �' .5
Page 1 of 5

1
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 4i4 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 150
2,4 Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3); Required Capacity: (ft.))
Number of Storage Ponds: 1; Total Capacity: 166.153 (ft'): Required Capacity: 155.991 (ft3)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. Applicants
Initials
3A One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations;, L,
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed,
3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP. it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:, G, .
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent.
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required.
3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farm Siting Act
including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed I inch
400 feet. At a minimum, the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to
occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools, hospitals, churches, outdoor recreational facilities, national
parks. state parks. historic properties, or child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500
feet, water supply wells within 500 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries, and
perennial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road. street, or highway from the facility, the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination.
3.3.5 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features that affect facility design, the
dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities, the fields used for waste application, and areas where
surface runoff is to be controlled.
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required.
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility.
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field.
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3. l5 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3. l7 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3. l8 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted. .
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction. or Expansion of Swine
Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
"your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, please include the additional components
Jth your submittal.
UnD f ,t. s rxrn I" %t V %V -- V V D '71'7100 o--- I -r a �CtAARGE PER,w r�

f
Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the
appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the project
submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow
toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore. you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to summit this form. with
items I through 7 completed. to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Superr-isor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I V copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located.
Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the
classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.1 Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
4.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm or technical specialist: C. LiM Barrier. Jr. Enviromental Specialist, Iredell Soil
and Water Conservation District 444 Bristol Drive Statesville NC 28677-2942
Telephone number: (704 ) 873-6761 _
4.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Hunting Creels
4.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located:lredell
a Map name and date:Harmonv NC 1993
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature,, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: rw st *rota, L' Pee [
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification. if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date.
(All attachments must be signed)
IV,
C�Uc
Ti'l oV,- A [AJf% n ATr1111 .... r `ID 17117/an U- 4 -I'=

APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
,. Kenneth Ladd (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2). attest
that this application for Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. l understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included. this application package will be
returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date � — � — 0 —
6. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if dilTerent from the Land Owner)
1. (Manager's name listed in question 1.6). attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included. this application package will be
returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE. INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
C1'1011d. A'%WN d� ArLlxl __ VV0 '7/'7100 D___ 4 -f--

k
Ar Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please tvne or print all information that does not require a sienature
Xxistin2 or New or (Expanded) (please circle one) i
General Information:
Name of Farm: Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy Facility No: 49 -- 14
Owner(s) Name: Kenneth Ladd Phone No: 704-546-7476
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd., Harmony, NC 2863.4_
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: lredell
Latitude and Longitude: 35 56 50 1 80 42 50 lntegrator:None
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): From Harmony NC _goeast an Hwy NC _901, to Sheffield
Rd., turn left on Sheffield Rd o to Dyson Rd. turn Right and go to Fox Hunter
Rd., turn left: and go to 521.Fox Hunter Rd.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
• Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
• Gilts
❑ Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
O Layer
❑ Pullets
Other Type of Livestock:
Tvpe of Cattle No. of Animals
CR Dairy 600
© Beef
Number of Animals:
Expanding Operation Only
Previous Desi n Ca aci 337 Additional Desi Ca aci : 263 Total Design Capacity.. 600
Acreage Available for Application: 454 Required Acreage: 150
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : I Total Capacity; 166,155 Cubic Feet (f33)
.Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or & (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
f'sled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District, I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner : Kqnn.e....th
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
WC -- August 1. 1997
Date: 6— `"0Z-
Date:
RGE PEP;'.
f..... .... ...

d
Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
M New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Samuel C. Bingham
USDA — NRCS
Address (Agency)' Laurel.
Signature: A
Work Completed: 4-15-02
one No.: 704-287-4220
te: p z
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
erfordton. NC 28139
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): _C_. Lipe Barrier-, Jr.
Affiliation NC — DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
A
S
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
M Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L. Hendrix
Affiliation USDA - NRCS_ Date Work Completed: 1-23-97
Address (
Signature
AWC -- August 1, 1997

s D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
¢ Existin or expanding facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
13 New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste applicatian equipment for spray irrigation. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Q New, expanded. or existinz facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using
Vray irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C . Li,pe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC-DENR, DSWC _ _ _ Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
Address (Agency):
E)
[e No.: 704-873-6761
r
ST,V*'UP.,. RC or I
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L. Hendrix
Affiliation USDA - NRCS _ _ Date Work Completed: 5-17-02_
Address (
Signature
No.: 704-873-6761
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block Is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21,1996, when was It constructed or last expanded
(we) certify that 1(we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner
Date:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

0
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, torage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (Sl)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards..and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L. Hendrix
Affiliation USDA-NRCS Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
Address (
Signature
B) Land ApplicationSite (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
No.:704-873-6761
M The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
U Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_C. Live Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC-DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
Address (Agency): 444 Bristol Dr. Statesville, NC 28677 Phone No.:704-873-676I
Signature: V'-J Date: - �9100
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
1 (we) certify that 1(we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. 1(we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 4U 3f,

C) Runoff _Controls_from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L . Hendrix
Affiliation_ USDA-NRCS .,_.................. Date Work Completed: 9-17-02
No.: 704-873--6761
D) Apiplication and Handling EQulument Installation (WUP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with
the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C . Lipe Barrier, Jr._
Affiliation. Nr--DENR, Dswc Date Work Completed: -
Addrew (Agency : 444 Bristol Dr.. 5 aCosville, NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
Signature: _ �. f� Date:Za
, ,D
The following signature block is only toibe used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will summit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature. Date:
E) Odor -Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD. SL WUP. RC or l)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality
management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L . Hendrix
Affiliation USDA-NRCS Date Work Completed: 5-10-02
to No.: 704-873-6761
AWC - August 1, 1997 5
Jt)NI T l200?
,,i CHARGE PE?

f Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature
lExiEsting- or New or (Exvanded) (please circle one) I
General Information:
Name of Farm: _ Rome Carl Ladd & Sons Dairy Facility No: 49 -- 14
Owner(s) Name: Kenneth Ladd Phone No: 704-546-7476
Mailing Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd., Harmo, _NC 28634
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: Irede11
Latitude and Longitude: 35 56 50 1 80 42 50 Integrator:None
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): From Harmony NC, go east on Uwy NC 901, to Sheffield
Rd., turn left on Sheffield Rd,_go_to Dyson Rd.., turn Right and go to Fox Hunter
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
O Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
• Farrow to Feeder
• Farrow to Finish
Z1 Gilts
❑ Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
Other Type of Livestock.,
Tvpe of Cattle No. of Animals
[R Dairy 600
❑ Beef
Number of Animals:
Expanding Operation Only '
Previous Design Capacity: 337 Additional Design Ca aci : 263 Total Design capacity: 600
Acreage Available for Application. 454 Required Acreage: 150
Number of Lagoons I Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 166, 155 Cubic Feet y13)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or (5 (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Lana Owner: Kenneth L
Signature:
Date: � �; 0 �
Name of'vlanager(i f different from owner): — . — --- - -
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
J U N 1 2000
PER".....,�.....:

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in ISA NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 214.0217 and ISA NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
H. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment_ System
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
M New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Samuel C. Bingham
Affiliation USDA — NRCS Date Work Completed: 4-15-02
Address (Agency Laurel Dr., Ruitherfordton, NC 28139 Phone No.: 704-287-4220
Signature: DaterIM 2 o a z
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):__C_._Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC — DENR DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
Address (Agency,): Phone No.: 7 4-873_ C 761
l + +
Signature: Date: .-5-
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
® Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L. -Hendrix
Affiliation USDA — ARCS Date Work Completed: 1-23-97
AWC -- August 1, 1997 2
j(
\1(.JN-F)ISCHARGE PFR''. '

D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate hoe
IR Existing or expanding_ facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
❑ New expanded, or existing facili without existing waste application equipment fors ra irri anon. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
U New, expanded, or existing facility without existing avast_e application equipment for land spreading not using
spray irrigation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC-DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
Address (Agency): 44� 4 Bristol Dr. , Statesville, 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
( g Y ' NC
Signature:- � X .� _ .� �l/'tdd�f _-- Date:.
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Manaeement and Emergency Action Plan (SD
Sl, WUP, RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan, Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L. Hendrix
Affiliation USDA - NRCS_. Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
No.: 704--873-6761
S-3o- az
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
;' ,;
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 11997 3 JUN 1 1 2002
wig DISCHARGE PERT..'

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment, Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards. -and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):__Larry L. Hendry
Affiliation USDA --MRCS Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
No.:704-873-6761
3 =.a?o — D Z—
^—
B) Land Annlication Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
U The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Cl Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/daylyear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C.___ Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC—DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-17-02
above has been checked.
Phone No.:704-8a73-6761
Date:.- ,/ d,._a
itional approval in III. B
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: NA.
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L. Hendrix
Affiliation_ URDA—NRCR_ _ Date Work Completed:5-17-02,,,,,,_
Address (Agevaa4l,,
: 444 Bristol Dr. Statesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
Sigure: natY Tate. .S --lv- O L
D) ; 2Dlication and Handling Eauinment Installation (WUP or n
Check the appropriate block
50 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
C� Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with
the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C._Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation lac-DENR, pswc Date Work Completed:. 5-17-02
The following signature block is only to'be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will subunit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enferc=ent action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality
management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry L. Hendrix
Affiliation USDA-NRCS Date Work Completed: 5-10-0 2
AWC -- August 1, 1997
one No.: 704-873-6761
te: .f-- s iz-at -
JUNK 7 1 3U0
LiC;I 1-c;' CHARGE PEP'
' "._... ,._.

F
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, Part II, must be included with this application
prior to the application being accepted as complete.
THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE FILLED OUT USING
THE 1 \ It KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS
Application Date:
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Kenneth Ladd
1.3 Mailing address: 521 Fox Hunter Road
City: Harmony State: NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number: ( 704) 546-7476
1 A County where farm is located: Iredell
1.5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Harmony go East on HWY NC 901 to left on
Sheffield road, to Right on Dyson Road, then left on Fox Hunter Road,A2 to 521 Fox Hunter Road.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No:49-14.
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 600
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow) ❑ Turkey
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
[] Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
No. of Animals: --
k
FORM: AWO-G- NEW or EXP. 7I7199 Page I of 5
�:_�!! Ci15Ci [FtRGE PER�ti- -

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not cavered by the application
system): 454 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 150
2.4 Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (W): Required Capacity: (0)
Number of Storage Ponds: l; Total Capacity: 166.155 (V); Required Capacity:155.991 (ft')
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. Applicants
Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations,
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent.
33.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required.
3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farm Siting Act
including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed I inch =
400 feet. At a minimum, the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to
occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools, hospitals, churches. outdoor recreational facilities, national
parks, state parks, historic properties, or child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500
feet, water supply wells within 500 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries, and
perennial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property- owners. all property- owners who own property located
across a public road. street, or highway from the facility. the local health department. and the county manager
or chair of the county board of conunissioners if there is no county manager. have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination.
3.3.5 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features that affect facility design, the
dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities. the fields used for waste application, and areas where
surface runoff is to be controlled.
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.3 , 7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required.
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility.
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field.
3.3,11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan,
3.3,17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction or Expansion of Swine
Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
"your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list. please include the additional components
ith your submittal.
VnO%4. A'LAIn f"' \TL'\=1 -- L'YD "71.7MA I)......'1 ,.fC

Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the
appropriate OWQ regional office and included as a part of the project
submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flogs
toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore. you are required prior to submittal of the application package, to subirut this form. with
items 1 through 7 completed to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Super-,isor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum. you must include an 8.5" by 1 I" copy of the portion of 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located,
Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the
classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.I Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
4.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm or technical specialist: C. Lipe Barrier_ fr. Enviromental-Specialist. Iredell Soil
and Water Conservation District, 444 Bristol Drive Statesville. NC 28677-2942
Telephone number: (704 ) 873-676
4.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Hunting Creek
4.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located:lredell
i Map name and date. -Harmony. NC 1993
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
a
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: "Iryt T/Yrq Cyr' �C
I.
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): 6( "!S --
Proposed classification, if applicable:/f
Signature of regional office personnel: Date:_
(All attachments must be signed)
J U N 1 1 2002
cna%,x. A%14-1 4" NTVlilt' z-vn Pf!^Imn -rr ,,jiA-DISCHARGE PEHr:;,'._:"

APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
Kenneth Ladd _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2). attest
that this application for Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not includa this application package will be
returned to me as incomplete.
Signature " _;7V kj2i� Date'
6. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1. (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.I) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge, I understand that if all required harts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included. this application package will be
returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE. INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING WFORMATION AND MATERIALS.
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
Vnan.r. A%1/n !- %TV%'11 __ VVD err-rinn n...._ •4 ..re

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, Part II, must be included with this application
prior to the application being accepted as complete.
<THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE FILLED OUT USING
THE I k 13 KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS
Application Date:
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Kenneth Ladd
1.3 Mailing address: 521 Fox Hunter Road
City: Harmony_______ State: NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number: ( 704) 546-7476
1.4 County where farm is located: Iredell
1.5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Harmony go East on HWY NC 901 to left on
Sheffield road, to Right on Dyson Road, then left on Fox Hunter Road, go to 521 Fox Hunter Road.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's 1 Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
Z. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No:49-14,
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer M Dairy 600
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow) ❑ Turkey
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
[] Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals--
J0 N l 1 2002 `
FORM: AWO-G- NEW or EXP. 7/7/99 Page 1 of 5 P'
�. LL,,1-DI: C1-IARGE PERV11."`'

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 454 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 150
R
2.4 Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity-: Cubic Feet (ft'): Required Capacity: (ft')
Number of Storage Ponds: I. Total Capacity: 166.155 (ft'}; Required Capacity:155.991 (ft3)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. Applicants
Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent.
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required.
3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farm Siting Act
including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch
400 feet. At a minimum, the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to
occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools. hospitals. churches. outdoor recreational facilities, national
parks. state parks, historic properties, or child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 300
feet, water supply wells within 500 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries, and
perennial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners. all property owners who own property located
across a public road, street, or highway from the facility. the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager. have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location,
3.3.5 A wetlands determination.
3.3.5 A map shoeing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features that affect facility design, the
dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities. the fields used for waste application, and areas where
surface runoff is to be controlled.
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required.
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility.
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field.
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUR
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.15 . The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3. l7 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
33,18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3. l9 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction-or-Expan f the
Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list. please include the additional components
"ith your submittal.
JUN 1 1 2002
VnDN't. AWn r- krvrxt cvo 'Tr'7r00 o- It ,.e.. ._....:..'
;-_a1 E-USCHARGE

Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the
appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the project
submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow
toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore, you are required prior to submittal of the application package. to submit this form, with
items 1 through 7 completed, to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum. you must include an 8.5" by 1 I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located.
Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the
classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.1 Varna Name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
4.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm or technical specialist: C. Lime Barrier. Jr, Enviromental Specialist. Iredell Soil
and Water Conservation District. 444 Bristol Drive Statesville. NC 28677-2942
Telephone number: (704 ) 873-6761
4.3 Name of closest dow-nslope surface waters: Hunting Creels
4.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located:lredell
i Map name and datc:Harmonv NC 1993
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature. and Date:
a
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segrnent(s):
G
Name of surface waters: v7 T,ncc, Cr-e
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification. if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: lrt /L-
(All attachments must be signed) ( ,
Date: �L ()
J U N 1 1 2002
V"DILA. 411/n r- NTVI%Ar -- VVD "FLIT/ O 0--- .4 -Cc �)[1-DISGHARGE PERK:'-- . "

APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
,. Kenneth Ladd (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest
that this application for Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dain- (Facility name listed in question 1,1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included. this application package will be
returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date � -" � r 0 "Z
6. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only ifdifTerent from the Land Owner)
1. (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be
returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE. INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FOR%1,11-1I' BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE ASAN ORIGIA-14L)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, Part H, must be included with this application
prior to the application being accepted as complete.
THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE FILLED OUT USING
THE Tab KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS
Application Date:
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Rome Carl .Ladd and Sons Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Kenneth Ladd
1.3 Mailing address: 321 Fox Hunter Rd.
City: Harmony State: NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number: ( 704) 546-7476
1.4 County where farm is located:
1.5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a cop) -
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Harmony. NC. go east on Hwv_NC 901 three miles.
left on Sheffield Rd one mile -right on Dyson Rd. 114 mile and left on Fox Hunter rd. to 321 Fax Hunter Rd.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land (honer):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No:
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals
❑ Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals Tyt)ce of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Layer ® Dairy 600
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Turkey
No. of Animals:,
i.
Cf1D1.1. A {Jill d" %TV117 n.. Z V D 01107/AO
l!!

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 454 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 150
2.4 Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (f 3); Required Capacity: (ft')
Number of Storage Ponds: 1; Total Capacity: t66,155 (ft'): Required Capacity:155.99I (ft3)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item_ Applicants
Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations,
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste :facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed-,
3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility does
not have a CAWMP. it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent.
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons. if required.
3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farm Siting Act
including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch =
400 feet. At a minimum the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to
occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools. hospitals. churches. outdoor recreational facilities. national
parks. state parks. historic properties. or child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500
feet, water supply wells within 300 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries, and
peremiial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property- owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road, street, or highway from the facility, the local health department. and the county manager
or chair of the county board of conunissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination.
3.3.5 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility- location showing features that affect facility design, the
dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities, the fields used for waste application. and areas where
surface runoff is to be controlled.
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.3.7 Proposed runoff' control measures., if required.
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility.
3.3. t0 The soil series present on every waste disposal field.
3.3.1 t The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3. l6 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3,17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted._...._........_
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction,,or Expansipn of Irvine
Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list. please include the additional components
Ath your submittal. j `lJ c(�
J:,1-DISCHARGE PER':' - �"

Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the
appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the project
submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow
toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed trust be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore. you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this fornL with
items i through 7 completed to the appropriate Di,,Ision of Water quality Regional Water Quality Supenisor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7. 5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located.
Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the
classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map. into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.1 Farm Nasne: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
4.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm or technical specialist: C. Lips Barrier. Jr, Emdromental SPeGialist. Iredell Soil
and Water Conservation District, 444 Bristol Drive, Statesville. NC 28677-29.42
Telephone number: (70 4 ) 873-6761
4.3 Name of closest do%vnslope surface waters: Hunting Creek
4.4 Couitty(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located: Iredell
i Map name and date:Harmonv, NC 1993
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters:^ fr el Tfhrj reP ll
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):��5 ^
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachments must be signed) r ��
Date:S—�— /'"` l

APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
Kenneth Ladd (Land Chvner's name listed in question 1.2), attest
that this application for Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy (Facility na=listed in question 1.1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be
returned to me as incomplete.. ,
Signature
Date Y — l — () Z �..
6. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question L 1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included this application package will be
returned as incomplete,
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]

T
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Fonn
(THIS FOR.II.bL l Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE.-1S.4_V ORI0.1:1L)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, Part II, must be included with this application
prior to the application being accepted as complete.
<THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE TILLED OUT USING
THE TAB KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS
Application Date:
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Kenneth Ladd
1.3 Mailing address: 321 Fox Hunter Rd.
City: Harmony State: NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number: ( 7041546-7476
L4 County where farm is located: Iredell
L5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers :for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Harmony, NC. o east on Hwy NC 901 three miles.
left on Sheffield Rd_ one mile. right on Dyson Rd. 1/4 mile and left on Fox Hunter rd. to 321 Fax Hunter Rd.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable. please circle which type is listed).
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No:
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No, of Animals"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 600
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ❑ Beef
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow) ❑ Turkev
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
❑ Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
No. of Anmals;_.d, ...._...._ . _..
,,�'�
YM'
E74-1 1.f. A\aln d- AiL Lit ..« LvA 91'7/no i]...... 1 -4rC

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 4i4 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 150
2.4 Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft- ), Required Capacity: (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: I Total Capacity: 166.155 (ft'). Required Capacity:155.991 (f(')
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. Applicants
Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations,
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed:
3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management flan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.11 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent.
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons. if required
3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farris Siting Act
including a site map prepared by a Registered land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch =
400 feet. At a minimum, the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to
occupied residences within 1500 feet. schools, Hospitals, churches, outdoor recreational facilities. national
parks. state parks, historic properties, or child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500
feet. water supply wells within 500 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries. and
perennial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road. street, or highway from the facility, the local health department. and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination.
3.3.5 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features that affect facility design, the
dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities. the fields used for waste application, and areas where
surface runoff is to be controlled.
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures. if required.
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility.
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal f eld.
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.15 The required MRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3. l8 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction or Expansion of SMne
Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
"vour CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, please include the additional components
Ath your submittal.

Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the
appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the project
submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that anv overflow from the facility would flow
toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore, you are required. prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form. with
items 1 through 7 completed, to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Super0sor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by I I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located.
identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the
classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.1 Farm Name: Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
4.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm or technical specialist: C. Lipe Barrier. Jr, Enriromental Specialist, fredell Soil
and Water Conservation District_ 444 Bristol Drive Statesville. NC 28677-2942
Telephone number: LZO4 ) 873-6761_
4.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Hunting Creek
4.4 Countv(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located:lredell
.i Map name and date: Harmony, NC 1993
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate). Signature, and Date:
6"k-& Jd6d4'L'('4 6/'/0 �?
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
PIease provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or Field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: Ar v7 7 /)ham C j[
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): i
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachments must be signed)
V"DV1. A{x!!l !" AlC1111 -- V V D 'IMMin a--- I -Cr
�— Date:

APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
_ Kenneth Ladd (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest
that this application for Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dain, (Facility name.listed in question 1.1) has been
revie,,ved by nie and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included this application package will be
returned to me as incomplete.
Sivature i Date
6. ' MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if dit3erent from the Land Ovmer)
I. _ (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that
this application for _ (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application
are lnot completed and that if all required supporting, information and attachments are not included. this application package will be
returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS.
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
i
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
s
t
i

Rome Carl Ladd and Sons
Dairy
ff!! AAII { I
11�1� I 1 ' c
Kenneth Dale Ladd ��Q2
f !Cf�r MSCHARGE PEMm-7 -iv
521 Fox Hunter Road
Harmony, NC 28634
Facility No, 49-14
Iredell County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
300 Milk Cows
50 Dry Cows
100 Bred Heifers
100 Young Heifers
50 Calves
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
May 28, 2002

ovc h"J'w
Farm Location Map
IN MILL Ladd Dairy
RDRoMAIBERRy
Facility No. 49-14
IANMLE T
RD
M,%jAHCN FARM >
RD -K CHIGGER
"A"AAN TO 0
ThANQUILITY 'Q4
clrr LN
126
901 2125 NY T�-ER
MYSR SC
28625 AV. aN QmON a 0
GROSE w-- - b�A—
lk
L ION
LIN
W,
w
TOMLIN !
RD
1843 E
00 .
S.239
EAR MARICN*g
0 uj
= OR
JWINCMILL Y m o ACExgy
CID CT
LU cl� RD.
4�
14�
PINEY
GALLIHER f?01 2130
lu
GLENWCOO VALLE"
"I OR.
I L Ut
�k <Z-
41 4� FORD
RD.
'11AW'
41-
'Z
J,
21 RD.
NWAY RD.
Cr
0 T1?JSL <
FLORA on.
hS,TR Point CID
MAGHO LN
HEARTACS
\LLE
ZI 59
fx-
K a FIJI
LLI cn
Cr EVANS VALLEY
:z BF AFL RD,
OR
Fkory' Ofk
PARSLEY 5 SO As
L - C.
Yr
�44R$f v OIL
41

.Facility Site Map
Ladd Dairy
Facility No. 49-14
T
IWO
�-
' by i!^ �... I �. � ""A .,. •> � r � J r'y p"
J
r1 �T'yY�G�"b N � � •f�p� P�''�Ir k M
A
w 40
4
ur
�A7w� �•�" ���� ..,nWa„� .' w,r",5, •',c.
ye
0.
•I�sy�ApX �i,l!�SY�,
Z4 ..
R!}�
y
�,,�, '�,,"§�.,�u',', �, �.: a �• ».. ,yxit� 2.. t _.
4 r�jJ�Y" i
� Y

•
L�
•
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
U5-29-2002
This plan has been prepared for:
Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
Kenneth Ladd
521 Fox Hunter Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
704-546-7476
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr., Environmental Spec. II
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ext.3
C /"'� 9L2L� C'
Develop r Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Y5:eaa44& -�e� &0 - � —0
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: _l34 a
Technical Specialist Signature Date
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-29-2002 Cover Page I

Map and Field Legend
Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
Field Number_ _ Total Aches Broadcast Acres Irrigated Acres Land Use
Tract 5239 Ladd Family Map 1
1
24.7
24.7
Pasture
2
4.9
4.9
Cropland
3
5.5
5.5
Pasture
4
2.0
2.0
Cropland
5
9.2
9.2
Cropland
6
3.8
3.8
Cropland
7
31.0
31.0
Cropland
8
14.5
14.5
Pasture
9
10.0
10.0
Pasture
10
11.2
1.5
Cropland
10 la
4.3
4.3
Cropland
10 lb
4.6
4.6
Cropland
11
82.5
8.3
Cropland
11 2a
3.6
3.6
Cropland
11 2b
5.9
5.9
Cropland
• 1'l 3a
4.9
4.9
Cropland
11 3b
5.2
5.2
Cropland
11 4a
5.3
5.3
Cropland
11 4b
3.8
3.8
Cropland
11 5a
6.0
6.0
Cropland
11 5b
3.8
3.8
Cropland
11 6a
4.0
4.0
Cropland
11 6b
1.3
1.3
'Cropland
11 7a
4.0
4.0
Cropland
11 7b
5.3
5.3
Cropland
It 8a
3.2
3.2
Cropland
11 8b
4.8
4.8
Cropland
11 8c
3.6
3.6
Cropland
Tract 5263 Map 1
1 7.6 7.6 Hayland
0 Page 1

Map and Field Legend
Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
Field Number Total Acres Broadcast Acres Irrigated Acres
Land Use
Tract 5275
Arthur W. Millers Map 3
1
11.4
Cropland
2
20.9
Cropland
3
4.5
Cropland
4
5.0
Cropland
5
10.6
Cropland
Tract 5308
Ladd Family
Map 3
1
81.0
81.0
Cropland
Tract 5310
Ladd Family
Map 3
1
15.8
15.8
Cropland
2
27.8
27.8
Cropland
Tract 5311
Ladd Family
Map 1
1
9.5
9.5
Cropland
2
20.0
20.0
Cropland
Tract 5764
Ladd Family
Map2
1
38.2
38.2
Cropland
0
Page 2

= i
......... . . . . . . . . .
31,1
Ii
WII`�
= I
E *
'v. It
- It'
•
I —
I
N
n ;
lIS QqV c.ice:4
.
.'fit ;i
;uA
tv
40, 1
l9k
it
AIX
"v
Pii, A
:r4
14
I.;.. ? I , 1, - - I. �. 4, 4 , � -
lb
Wa
4
ir
4,1
wl
fl

• �Z'' -. - ` ' ' ^ ,..*•: ,,., `��l'�,���.'�.p••r�-;ram �'�' � ��
Yih 'C
-. .:� _.�_ � - .a•�•... ��Jy ��t fir' �i� _ #'i'�,. r�1�� _Ai - �'�'"t:F •.a
wR
Nle
10
r - a
>ti
`C fro t r ;d '-' _ may}-t��.f'ia���rr�'7-. _ ice.. _.- F'��L - _j���a{-� ��Y--'ric• .:{! tea. _ _
j£s' �.+. - - •�++� { ''�,� �YF;-�� e '._ � - -�`-+' � •� v� •[. iir i'��a � 4 �rr+t5�� sr^,T � "r� � l: . r "�_ � -"�_ TS
•
t >
,a €.
..!'_ ?irk -. -� = '.-'+�T:.Tix"' _ #'.y��ltg;• •'R`,F[:t,r :t 7F•� .. r ,D:.-',rf'� - t �,•. "_�:-��y_� -
Y tb '. .w.►�$. .,�'"i , =-r �� . ,Lys �Jr._ ,� _�. _ x. � � � �•� ... F�+' .1'J==a7�- ,.� E _ '` _ :�- 3, 9 �'� F I
^a ren. .,�,.',� s F .� .> • `y,"if: -i" - -ai .�. - ..:fit s^sY ,i _
- c ; . c•'3i'4 a=Y You :-'dy a : Ri` :_s r - �Y`ji'r.E s - k • , s, - .F ' ' '--t ro -
v ,� -`•"• �a �". �'$ _ _,>�sy..._i`•.,,5•�a,:� `"f �' Ax ,� •'t - i �;� t ? � � ?�i ,.411.
..
y�a',_
•. '! i`_'� r ' t'" s... _ '�a"A!F y'ti f ?C - ' 4-.:'r� T, �t fg�� Y `
{. -�eve
-
T
,
: �- - -� �.` - _ t __ �,;}�iy73{��a'i _ t.'$ .• � .,u trt 1 :;..'. �`� �. +�p -�'Y. F - .^�� '�� si-�'yr�''�'-5 .__ _ � y. j�.r'SQz' � �+ � ?D�r} � =�� •`,��
F � - i�_ 4- •,C a9�:'1 � �� f
Not
J
�.� r ti rr; _ �,�._, "�.-.:.:�- .� ,.K '4T _,.���...` '�r-y ,w •r_Fi _ y`� 31,
S
z,
- _
_
v ,� a ,� a F3�._ .�: .'�--� �� r.�� ... r' €z.x .-°�ik,. ' p• rr -��-r •e:r ?• _ _ - : Q
,. � � � - Via-" � o ,--a. � s .,�� -, �. •�ya. a - A g." _ ?-s. _ � �� �F�
y.
:
4
tA-4
s
IMA
� _ "'' R`aa5 �- '•exa r='
t „ •�y�. it - r � 7.. -t '.�';.'.`_ x '.�`-'r'.- ... r'Ff ��.' � e .r;,` - .; :�aE 1.��� ° � _ P'�`�•-r, ���. r'�.� '�' _�
- - .� - - -max x � - x .7h k ^s '- � x• -,rF
., 41
�E
WWI
x :,,,.'''+'"` ag f t�i' .- ' _ - _ "d'x',. - -"•"ram. 6'a` _ #.. R ''�� ..., v t
{
S �«
�r
J -
€I` _mil
4r _
7•L
- as
t.
'�s ' ` -�_ � <..: ' .. � . �, is =� �f w t+ -`� _ :F:-� ;�,� ;• mat' ��i',��- �„•_ �.:r�,.::
lk. _
- .. �- r y-± �`:� ,.. _: :.-;° �+..- - : ii.�e 'a» ...t- k. t., � - rt _ 'sa � i•, `a ir'
�s:. .3: i; -: �. „-- :�. �.-y. _. "i_ �. 'O++-• J-� + i4 •4. { A �` -, 2.=._ . r. i.-i..� - �.•��� Y T�....- .�."'
f
Y
e� .. fir L - ., � `:i -,. Y _ X * — f . ? �_ Y:,.,� � ~il ..'°� I .. .r •;. a _'.•X� r - '>'. _ � � . 4 1�.., _� L _ b_Sa.'. F ...nC
`,€"u�
r`
s � t
-1. w- a . .... _f �i .-� --,:�, .. i� ; �._ .� �ik • r e � 8 i� $ �Alr 3� r � • _ -g �138 �,_,�
774
:, r. = st k:. *f; E -� r' >tiw --,. r:�: s.• r f ��, i}• �i.
-`-..,.r"= -t . ; _ i E`. .:- -x�.-• :. �`" a`.. _4a i+aPr = _ ...8 ' `_yi��.. rr.s.. 4,..y
- - _.r} •-�' _�.: �� �. f _.Ai_ +ic. _^{ �� �x: - - 1 - � IEr'='�-�"'��"- ' "-r`. ��,:rr:, �_-r,,._'�q, ..�Y s:•t :r
r�� "i, .s�v- --,-_ .. -. . _ x '..Ayf • � 1�. :�. .' _ - � :y'R-. -i' _ °t.- - �--�- ,er y +�+ TY" rr• �- ��
40
g r
�-`-
s
-
-.� - _s' �.: as ^ - -'Y" C :,kF t'_e"_ P � 3r � � _ •.7 � � f. � _. tea_ �AyS-... ...re-�
wx�,;
4

Field Location Map
Ladd Dairy
Facility No. 49-14
f i•
�.. Y -
. a
S
m
IF I.•�y'�,r Il' 11.E ,
p�
r: e(
y n j it
.s,
N sx*
9�

-i.4 5
t. • 3 r.rr,'� 7�, ": d ✓„� � � ,� tr '�� ¢ir I'' �� � i °.nr��t� 1 � `' C �'���.� � �.,. ._ ..:.
' S ,.� ,, f �� '�.�" '� k • 3 1 ,,,,y b� ,s hey.. 1' �, f . r+r. f �; �� J � n. y� � '� ':rt
..., ", ¢' '..','S7 �r�"a ,' ¢r � "re• �,y rr�t ' fir- FMB" _;.: '' 1,
r r i i ` r•�: „ L 'r{.b''S .r-i-+ t r" `�°',1 'n;
y�i t a " .,r; ,.�w .r,. ��++f+ rev.' ,, •. +i�s�_ fi
F ,lry i S •r. I ,� ., �y+
! 1
4t
r•'
P Y'
r
Ik ,
z >; el i
44
ir„
I
9
1 r 4,� �• +,.�� �,&��s-�` rK:. t5r>i � tr{� rt'-,�� �.P rat n:�"�e�.,�
..1'y'j
s � +
f8�i!. � � •�`! y � 1! �'.' �eF � ! 1 ' 1:�� y 4 �'t�!. � �s F�.�Y°1�.: {� � 11.
�,
fff .as.+t { `{>r q� ry x'm.Y 4-1
r.: � ^�{ x,��iWi�. � ' �' y }�r� ,,.: � 4 �it�"r t r e5t,` t.A.r t r �� R1�',i' " �F } t •a
4 5 - }1-•e• s ,r• - ! s�-3 ' �_ �T #m R4 �;�� �kf:gY'�f W i4 ,s3 �;i�y�•
a
.T
o
a �
a1 f
4'eC'fT�,Fr*AFs
W �,c 9� a ey� j;'4 d. r yr Fj r:
Y�-z'�
i
r .
-�� _ + Y -�'• �.dfi � f��� s "AesR �_ y a lei. �, -A +s r'iza.`� � �A ,S h 'ii�..� l� m ,� �l�l v� i'
$ i�"F`. �a y,i'.� s„•h7��yr'�_ L .S �t. t 1-Y, r �-�.o� ,"T <int°�'tt! Y,�
yy�+ 4y r
Vj
•,�ri
�
�
r • �_ � ':� sS _ f __ �...:r ! 1 :� ra 5 ( d +Fti �,' ° �.'.,� �� .P ��7s w. F rx:Gq � 7.��'�'I r k! ��.
f
_ � ,��r� -� ! r9' a s "e�-� p `' � •c�,, � s z,� G � �''�<i ��,��- �''�1r�?',tit`�s
f�a •� .!-• 'L� d"ti.` r. •'� ti�d'�.+ � � r �l,r �� {r � �� vi`_ ,x � .ar:9� �.�.�_..t
fr.., 4. -��y. "iv F' .. .�Y + .� •.-'1t`� p.;_ ?. s .� '. ^y '� s }... ix _. � 5.p�uy[?'�
y ,
� _ �'lrrt�+ �
� r e%
f
} R rr
l �
a
• „ YF
r' r
pp ,_
+ u
.F
1 • r �.. �: . iv � r• + .' y^+ s
09
P,
^ r r
t` '' � ' is ". y.r � � ..� +: : Hr.S .r * i ii d"I-`")�:.. ..,r � ^.• �. +H, 7 If �:�
a ^,+, ;..p J "s �' p-^,° Ac ''iy y •A}r g��.f` 14,�, '!""'. `�pf y,1 y+:.'+ rw+w•.-ia.f ,P'.».
':f , ,� � d$, + d d,"l�. *rog e°"�'!N .�'P'pt�, ��:,. - 1§ rl.ar+�'I �:�t, •',,4, �J• i �.� C�'. o.iri; y:,r ua .„ �F ��i!t-. NS 3-,j.�'.
q,•-. s+au: ." ..r- d.! � ti. i, d" .. ',"i ryr�•-': Sp �f' N f:��:,
� ' r
r
� _ - s i S �•�.l�'��w�l! 4444 r 7a•�� ��JiK ! � a B'"��� si is w5,
',
50 t "y i,. '�'a..4."ww'., #'�S k Y~;4b ,`i•'.,
Y'.+iii,�A + •�' f
ry

1 � +F :l �' say S � � �� � � �" S • � �
`'f a =�� ..-+!] ,� � � �� �,�, � -,�; �i �. ,� � � �•�'-
r�r � :. �y 1 a�fit _ .r •kj�-,y ,� II P �����,'� - �s;•
t„ w�
:.a.., � ;_ �,�•� r„-y � ,. -'•. � 1 _ � /g �� .J; Fri S 'r a
\ :.: �- ; � �, s ' � .t° � � '° � • .`•ate .r, j � '+L ".•. � '�` a �e�t� i E,y ' �l � �i �`+ Tii� -
'
Ffa., J .� k n [ 1 � ���� r, y "�i,3T.rYF��WC� .� r� i ,.� �! • • -:,ae "-� � S �` �k� j.t+ , ; ,�;,F. -- ,^
r
a �n
r u � .,, . 1 wu - - >� �;r u." �' 1 x � • WMAR
A-
vi
11-A
��`�' •y 1 V"� i�+ -.�r �''..�' r �":.��.., '- _`�M.�''' _- icy '. .✓r iliH >;3 f' _ T��?��.`_". 3 �''"f -`'-"~ �i
NOR
-.rPR"•.; _ .1 . ,� Iry �, r�x�r�' � �.'r- 7:_T'-: yi ;s`.«<: f �� ?:.'y,f`,.I c-" ` '# ° �: "�'
3s` ny� � •iS. L �
�:. .1 +�'. �''� `` � }�, y _ _ s/ y '.}1..'F ti..., „z� .✓.....•i.jk y���+.'�t"S•.+,''.. ":'Y't �'.
it -1 r,'i -' <'�,:+� �r•3i L"ra- `. `°"�'4
��.._�'YJ' •� -_ -�. 1r��y�d j fA ,� Y'L,�l�j _ •.1 ov �'`� S-a' "{'��`` _
r'� F� "" aih 4:jI� 9• r �r 1 I t '� � f174
+' � i_;'' '.'i3'' i.t� ia.�' 1 �� ���,k9.. i' ® `4p �F�-�}R--J• xYv
VA
min
It
f. fit. b% -4. �, .. � i .! ;ram. R. _ F,1 � � �, '• �: -�e3 - �; ':' `i" � i :�'. i?.,�.
' Y
'a .yam �s _ 1y9 s♦ � _ yJ� � �� '..*,'�.c � _ _ ��-�:'
.�+•sx3�r� �M ti1. !' +� 1 � �"7� r' :~ ri z c - ` � '{v' _�x����t- t � `w
.8_ ,uE� ;� �.-.,* '" a <' x -.£--• �. - .« .sue:* � i--`
�' $ • :'bf sO� '�� y,;`� ?� r �I !1"g � :S �^ s-: - ` x �a� .• -� c" � a S
a ,
•,,y-_ � _^ems_-• �- ; i;� -
a
Lq
Firyy t �pdiitt�A

. Narrative
ABOUT THE LADD DAIRY
The Ladd Dairy plans to grow to 600 Dairy animals of various ages over the next several years.
Additional buildings are being planned in preparation for the expandition. The Waste Storage
Pond is adquate, but will required the storage period to be shorten to 120 days. Sufficient
land is available for animal waste disposal.
Most Animal Waste is collected the the Waste Storage Pond and spread by irrigation on to
cropland. Dairy Solids are collected on spread on other cropland and pasture.
CROP NOTES
This plan uses a two year cropping system even though the system may be longer. It includes
all the crops grown on the fields involved except annual sorghums. These can be subsituted
for corn using the same PAN (Plant Available Nitrogen) rates. An additional year or more of
corn can be grown, using the same PAN rate as the first year.
The PAN for Small Grains and Grasses is divided into Fall and Spring applications, but total
could be used at any time. Add both fall and spring together for crop total used in record
keeping.
. The PAN to be supplied to crops following soybeans must be reduced by 20 lbs due to
N carry over. The software automaticly does this for crops that follow in this plan.
All corn is planned for silage. If the corn silage is not needed and the corn is harvested
for grain, the PAN applied must to reduced by 45%.
If small grain silage/hay is not needed and harvested as grain the PAN is nearly the same
and no adjustment is needed, but if not utilized and left for cover, only 25 lbs. of PAN can be
applied, and all must be transferred to the next crop.
Rescuegrass (Matua Grass)is being grown on this farm. The expected yeild or RYE is
7.5 tons/acre for Cecil Soil in the fields used.
The symbol * is shown beside some RYE and PAN amounts on the Waste Utilization Tables.
Approved RYE and PAN data for these crops are not available for the soil types they
are being grown on. Information from Memorandum by Dr. Jim Green, Chairman of the NC
State University Forage Production Workgroup, dated 6-29-98 was used for Rescuegrass.
RECORD KEEPING
All waste applications must be sampled and test results used for recording Animal Waste Application.
This information along with soil test provides information on the additional nutrients needed for crop
production.
40 $95777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: O5-29-2002 Narrative Page 1 of 2

i
Narrative
ANIMAL WASTE SOURCES
Ladd Dairy Slurry
550 Dairy Animal Produce 3,333,000 gals. of Animal Waste Slurry annually.
This slurry contains 22,670 lbs. PAN (Plant Available Nitrogen)
See Waste Management System for the Ladd Dairy Farm by Sam Bingham Dated 4-15-02
Section III, C. and VI, C. for Support Information
Ladd Dairy Solids
205 Tons of Animal Waste Solids are produced annually by 150 Dairy Animals containing
881 lbs. of PAN
See Waste Management System for the Ladd Dairy Farm by Sam Bingham Dated 4-15-02
Section V, A. and VI, C. for Support Information.
- ...---..
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-29-2002 Narrative Page 2 of 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U1
Ladd Dairy Slurry waste generated 3,333,000 gals/year by a 550 animal
Dairy Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 120 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
24944
Incorporated
34015
Injected
38550
Irrigated
22676
Actual Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
25,792
4,760,064
-1,427,064
Year 2
25,792
4,760,064
-1,427,064
Year 3
25,792
4,561,632
-1,228,632
U2
Ladd Dairy Solids waste generated 205.50 tons/year by a 150 animal Dairy
Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
881
Incorporated
1167
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Actual Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Tons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
87,239
20,717.22
-20,511.72
Year 2
66,383
15,850.37
-15,644.87
Year 3
79,278
18,859.44
-18,653.94
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
ofNRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
Note: in source ID; S means standard source, U means user defined source.
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-29-2002 Source Page 1 of 1

'1?1e Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the craps to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and
the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be
used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent overapplication of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
See CROP NOTES in the Narrative Section for Additional Information
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
1.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
lbs/A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
]hs/A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gal/A
tans
1000 gals
tons
5239
1
U2
Cecil
24.70
24.70
Fescue Pasture
41 Tons
&1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.w
906-92
5239
2
U2
Chewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Small Crain, Siiage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
22
0.00
108.62
5239
2
U2
Chewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
2115-6,130
291
0
0
Broad.
29t
0.00
68
0.00
332.73
5239
3
112
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
811-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.00
179.b8
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*7.0 Tons
911-3/31
*74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.00
17
0.00
34,54
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
*20.0 Tons
2/I5-6/30
*208
0
0
Broad.
208
0.00
49
0M)
97.07
5239
5
02
Cecil
9.20
9.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
811-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
43
000
397.33
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.90
Small Grain, Silage/llay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
24
0.00
92-22
5239
6
02
Cecil
3.801
3.80
Cara, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
50
0.00
188.97
5239
7
U2
Cecil
31.00
31.00
Corn, Silage
19.5Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
0.00
45
0.00
1,396-13
5239
7
U2
Cecil
31.00
31.00
Rescuegrass Hay
*6.3 Tons
8/1-7131
1 *140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.00
1,01274
5239
8
U2
Cecil
14.50
14.50
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7131
143
0
0
Broad.
1 143
0.00
44
0.00
63965
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 5/29/02 WUT Page

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
1_D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Ibs/A
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
1hslA
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N I
N
N I
lbs/A I
1000
gal/A
tons I
I000 gals
tons
5239
9
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0,00
44
0.00
441.14
5239
10
UI
Cecil
11.20
1.50
Fescue flay
43 Tons
8/t-7/3t
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0
49.98
0.00
5239
10 IA
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
91.46
0.00
5239
10 IA
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
38,03
0
186,34
0.00
5239
1010
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-313 t
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
NAG
0.00
5239
10 1B
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Cam, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
prig.
218
38.03
0
182.54
0.00
5239
11
U1
Cecil
82.50
8.30
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7131
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0
276.55
O.OQ
5239
11 2A
Ul
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
56.00
0.00
5239
11 2A
Ul
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
114.09
0.00
5239
11 2B
Ul
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
102.66
0.00
5239
11 2B
Ul
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Inig.
2t8
38 03
0
209.16
0.00
11 3A
U1
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig_
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
11 3A
Ul
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
11 3B
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Stnall Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
106,39
0.00
11 3B
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/1S 6l30
218
fl
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
11 4A
Ul
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
91E-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
IQ7
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
[52391
11 4A
U1
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Cam, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115 6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.0+!
11 4B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
11 4B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Com, Silage
200 Tons
2/15 fi130
2l8
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
2I6.77
0.E10
11 5A
Ul
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/flay
9.6 Tons
911-3/3E
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
123.19
0.00
11 SA
Ui
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Cam, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
3803
0
250.99
0.00
11 5B
UI
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig
107
t8,67
0
106.39
0.00
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5129/02 WUT Page 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D. I
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
lbs/A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic-
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N I
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
I" gals
tons
5239
11 5B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
5239
11 6A
U1 1
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9-6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
95.20
0.00
5234
11 6A
Ul
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
01
193.95
0.00
5239
11 6B
Ul
Cecil
I.30
1.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
[Trig.
107
18.67
0
28.00
0.00
5239
11 6B
UI
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Com, Silage
20-0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
57.04
0.00
5239
11 7A
Ul
Cecil
4-00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18-67
0
52.26
0.00
5239
i 11 7A
U1
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
106.48
0.00
5239
it 7B
UI
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
0
70.93
0.00
5239
11 7B
Ul
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
144.51
0.00
5234
11 8A
Ul
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
76.53
0.00
5234
it 8A
Ul
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Cam, Silage
20-0 Tons
2/t5-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
155.92
0.00
5239
11 SB
Ul
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
48.53
0.00
5239
11 8B
Ul
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
216
38.03
0
98.88
0.00
5239
11 8C
Ut
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
28.00
0.00
5239
11 8C
Ul
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
57.04
0.00
--5263
1
U2
Lloyd
7.60
7.60
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
50
0.00
377.75
-5275
1
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
540.02
--5275
1
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
D.00
144.98
--5275
2
U2
Cecil
20.90
20.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
0.00
46
0.00
965.65
-5275
2
U2
Cecil
20-90
20-90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
54
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12
0.00
260.92
-5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Com, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
213.16
-5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
131
0.00
57.23
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WUT Page 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
1.D-
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use_
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req`d
bs/A
Comm-
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
1bs/A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
I"
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
-5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2115-6130
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
236.85
-5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/May
9.8 Tons
9/1-3131
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
63.59
-5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Corn, Silage
19.1 Tons
2/15W30
208
0
20
Broad,
188
0.00
44
0.00
465.02
-5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
l0.fi0
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11
0.00
119.9 6
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
8I.00
81.00
Corn, Silage
I9.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Broad,
188
0-00
44
0.00
3,553.45
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8-7 Tons
9/1-3131
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0-00
11
0.00
916.72
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
748.45
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15-80
15.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.,
55
0.00
13
0.00
200.93
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27-80
27.90
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
211SW30
223
0
20
Broad,
203
0.00
47
0.00
1,316.89
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27-80
27.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad,
55
0.00
13
0.00
353.55
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
97
0.00
231
0.00
215.03
5311
l
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Corn, Silage
19.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
208
0
0
Broad.
208
0.00
49
0.00
461.10
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
0.00
46
0.00
887.10
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Rescuegrass Hay
*6.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
*133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
31
0.00
595.88
57&4
1
U2
Cecil
38.20
38.20
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
11809,53
5764
1
U2
Cecil
38.20
38.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/!-3/31
55
4
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
485.81
Lagoon
Liquids
Total Applied, 1000
gallons
4,561.63
FF = Q
Total Produced 1000 gallons
3,333.00
"
__
Balance 1000 gallons
-1 228.63
-
Manure Solids
Total A lied tons
20,717-22
Total Produced tons
205.50
Balance, tons
-20,511.72
Notes: ! . In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. SymboI * rneans user entered data.
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed_ 5/29/02 WUT Page 4

• 0 0
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract I
Field
Source
t.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Ibs/A
Carom.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
lbs/A
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N I
N
N
Ibs/A I
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals I
tons
5239
1
U2
Cecil
24.70
24.70
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7131
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.00
806.92
5239
2
U2
Chewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9,0 Tons
911-3131
*95
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
22
0.00
108.62
5239
2
U2 I
Chewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad,
291
0.00
68
0.00
332.73
5239
3
U2
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.00
179.68
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*7.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.00
17
0.00
34.54
5239
4
U2
I Wehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Com, Silage
*20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
*208
0
0
Broad-
208
0.00
49
0.00
97.07
5239
5
U2
Cecil
9.20
9.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
43
0.40
397.33
5239
6
02
Cecil
3.80
3.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9A Tons
9/1-3131
104
©
0
Broad.
104
0.00
24
0.00
92.22
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Cam, Silage
19.5 "Cons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
50
0.00
188.87
5239
7
U2
Cecil
31.00
31.00
Rescuegrass Hay
*6.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
*140
0
0
Broad.
1 140
0.00
33
0.00
1,012.74
5239
7
U2
Cecil
31.00
31.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9A Tons
9/1-3/31
52
0
0
Broad.
52
0.00
12
0.00
376.16
5239
8
U2
Cecil
14.50
I4.50
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
44
0.00
639.65
5239
9
U2
Cecil
10.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
9/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
44
0.00
441.14
5239
10
UI
Cecil
11.20
1.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0
49.98
0.00
5239
10 IA
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/3 t
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
p
91.46
0.00
5239
10 IA
UI
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Com, Silage
20.0Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig_
218
38.03
0
186.34
0.00
5239
10113
U1
Cecil
4.601
4.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tans
911-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
89.60
0.00
5239
10113
UI
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Com, Silage
20.0Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
182.54
0.00
5239
11
UI
I Cecil
82.50
8.30
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0
276.55
0.00
5239
11 2A
UI
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
56.00
0.00
5239
11 2A
U1
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Com, Silage
20.0Tons
2/15-6130
21$
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
114.09
0.00
5239
11 2B
UI
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/t-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
102.66
0.00
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WUT Page 5

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
LID. I
Sail Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
IIss1A
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
ibs/A
Res.
Qbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N I
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
I ODO gals
tons
5234
11 2B
U 1
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
209.16
0.00
5239
11 3A
UI
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11 3A
U1
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/I5-6130
218
0
01
Irrig.
218
38.03
p
216.77
0.00
5239
11 3B
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tans
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11313
UI
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Cam, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
5239
11 4A
UI I
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11 4A
UI
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-W30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
5239
11 4B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11 4B
UI
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Com, Silage
20.0 Tans
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Itrig.
218
38.03
o
216.77
0.00
5239
11 SA
UI
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
123.19
0.00
5239
11 SA
Ill.
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Cam, Silage
20A Tons
2/15�i/30
218
D
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
250.44
0.00
5239
11513
U1
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig_
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11 SB
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.$0
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/E S-W30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
5239
11 6A
U1
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
95.20
0.00
5239
11 6A
UI
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
20.0Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
38.03
0
193.95
0.00
5239
11 6B
UI
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
28.00
0.00
5239
11 6B
UI
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Com, Silage
20.0 Tans
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
57.04
0.00
5239
11 7A
UI
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
Q
52.26
0.00
5239
11 7A
UI
Cecil
4.00
4,00
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
38.03
Q
106.48
0.00
5239
11 7B
Ul
Cecil
5.30
5,30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
70.93
0.00
5239
11 7B
UI
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
144.51
0.00
5239
11 8A
Ui
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
O
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
76.53
0.00
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WUT Page 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
1,13.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use_
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(1bs/A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
lbs/A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N I
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
5239
11 8A
UI
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
38.03
0
155.92
0.00
5239
11 8B
U1
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
48.53
0.00
5239
11 8B
U1
Cecil
4.80
4.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
38.03
0
98.88
0.00
5239
it 8C
ill
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Ireig.
107
18.67
Q
28.00
0.00
5239
11 8C
U1
Cecit
3.60
3.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15W30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
57.04
0.00
--5263
1
U2
I Lloyd
7.60
7.60
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
213
0
0
Broad,
213
0.00
50
0.00
377.75
-5275
1
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
144.98
-5275
l
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
34
0.00
393.07
--5275
2
U2
Cecil
20.90
20.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
54
0
0
Broad.
54
0.00
12
0.00
260.92
-5275
2
UZ
Cecil
20.90
20.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
34
0.00
702.29
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
57.23
-5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
34
0.00
151.21
--5275
4
112
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tans
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
63.59
---5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
34
0.00
168.01
--5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-N31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11
0.00
119.96
-5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9115
128
0
D
Broad.
128
0.00
30
0.00
316.61
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/I 3131
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11
0.00
916.72
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
0.00
30
0.00
2,419.37
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
200.93
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
34
0.00
530.92
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27.80
27.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3131
55
0
D
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
353.55
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27.80
27.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9115
1 144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
34
0:00
934.15
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WUT Page 7

s 0 •
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Ibs/A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
lbs/A
Res.
(ibs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
5311
l
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
97
0.00
23
0.00
215.03
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Com, silage
19.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
208
0
0
Broad.
208
0,00
49
0.00
461.10
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Rescuegrass Hay
*6.0 Tons
811-7/31
*133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
31
0.00
595.88
5311
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
54
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
5764
1
U2
Cecil
38.20
38.20
Smai1 Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
485.81
5764
t
U2
Cecil
38.20
38.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
34
0.00
1,283.61
La oon
Li uids
Total Applied,
1000
gallons
4,561.63'
Total Produced 1000
gallons
3,333.00'L
Balance 1400 allons
Manure Solids
Total Applied, tons
< .;'_ , :_;_:
15,850.37
Total Produced tons
T£ `r .4
205.50
Balance, tons
w.Y; -
-15,644.87
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol - means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. symbol * means user entered data-
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WUT Page 8

i ! •
Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crap
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
1bs1A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
lbs/A
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons I
1000 gals
tons
5239
1
U2
Cecil
24.70
24.70
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7131
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.00
806.92
5239
2
U2
Chewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
*95
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
22
0.00
108.62
5239
2
U2
Chewacla-P
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30 1
291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
68
0.00
332.73
5239
3
U2
Cecil
5.50
5-50
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
33
0.00
179.68
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*7.0 Tons
911-3/31
*74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.00
17
0.00
34.54
5239
4
U2
Wehadkee-P
2.00
2.00
Cam, Silage
*20.0 Tons
2/15W36
*208
01
0
Broad.
208
0.00
49
0.00
97.07
5239
5
U2
Cecil
9.20
9.20
Fescue Pasture
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
140
0
0
Broad-
140
0.00
43
0.00
397.33
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104.0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
24
0.00
92.22
5239
6
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
50
0.00
188.87
5239
7
U2
Cecil
31.00
31.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
52
o
0
Broad.
52
0.00
12
0.00
3767
5239
7
U2
Cecil
31.00
31.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9115
140
0
0
Broad-
140
0.00
33
0.00
1,012.74
5239
8
U2
Cecil
14.50
1450
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
44
0.00
639.65
5239
9
U2
Cecil
10.00
IU0
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
44
0.00
441.14
5239
10
U1
Cecil
11.20
1.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
brig.
191
33.32
0
49.98
0.00
5239
10 1A
U1
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1 3/3I
107
0
0
Irrig_
107
18.67
0
91.46
0.00
5239
10 lA
UI
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig,
218
38.03
0
186.34
0.00
5239
10 1B
U1
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
89.60
0.00
5239
10 1 B
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
182.54
0.00
5239
11
UI
Cecil
82.50
8.30
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/I-7131
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
33.32
0
276.55
0.00
5239
11 2A
U1
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Sma11 Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
WI-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
56.00
0.00
5239
11 2A
Ul
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38 03
0
114.09
0.00
5239
11 2B
U t
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/ 1-3131
107
0
0
brig,
107
18.67
0
102.66
0.00
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WUT Page 9

• 0 i
Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic-
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A I
1000
gal/A
tons I
I OW gals
tons
5239
11 2B
UI
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
209.16
0.00
5239
11 3A
UI
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18,67
0
106.39
0.W
5239
It 3A
UI
Cecil
4.90
4.90
Com, Silage
20.0 Tans
2/15-&30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38,03
0
216.77
0.00
5239
11 3B
UI
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11 3B
Ui
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
5239
11 4A
UI
Cecil
5,30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
brig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11 4A
U1
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Com, Silage
20.0 Tours
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
21$
38.03
0
216,77
0.00
5239
11 413
UI
lCecill
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
brig,
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
$239
11 4B
Ul
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
0
twig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
UO
5239
11 5A
Ul
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
0
123.19
0.00
5239
It 5A
UI
Cecil
6.00
6.00
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
250.99
0.00
5239
It 5B
U1
Cecil
3:80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31.
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
106.39
0.00
5239
11 5B
U1
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6i30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
216.77
0.00
5239
It 6A
U1
Cecil
4,00
4.00
Small Grain, SilagefHay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18,67
0
95.20
0.00
5234
11 6A
UI
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
193.95
0.00
5239
11 6B
UI
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
28.00
0.00
5239
11 6B
U1
Cecil
1.30
1.30
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
frrig_
218
38.03
0
57.04
0.00
5239
t 1 7A
U1
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig,
107
18.67
0
52.26
0.00
5239
11 7A
UI
Cecil
4.00
4.00
Com, Silage
20.0 Tours
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
106A8
0-00
5239
11 7B
UI
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, SilagefHay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
70.93
0.00
5239
11 713
U1
Cecil
5.30
5.30
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
frrig.
218
38.03
0
144,51
0.00
5239
11 8A
U1
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
76.53
0.00
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WUT Page I0

i 0 •
Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use_
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Ibs/A
Comm.
Fen,
Nutrient
Applied
ibs/A
Res_
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N I
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
5239
11 8A
U1
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Cam, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
0
brig.
218
38.03
0
155V
0.00
5239
11 813
U I
Cecil
4.80
4.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
prig.
107
18.61
0
48.53
0.00
5239
11 8B
U) lCecil
4.80
4.801
Cam, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
219
38.03
0
98.98
0.00
5239
11 9C
U I
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Small Crain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
18.67
0
28.00
0.00
5239
11 9C
U1
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Cam, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Irrig.
218
38.03
0
57.04
0.00
-�5263
1
U2
Lloyd
T60
7.60
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
50
0.00
377.75
-5275
1
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Cam, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
540.02
5275
1
U2
Cecil
11.40
11.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
144.9 .
5275
2
U2
Cecil
20.90
20.90
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad,
198
0.00
46
0.00
965.65
5275
2
U2
Cecil
20.90
20.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
54
0
0
Broad-
54
0.00
12
0.00
260.92
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Cam, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
213.16
5275
3
U2
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
57.23
--5275
4
U2
Cecil
5.00
5.00
Cam, Silage
20.5 Tons
W15- i/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
236.85
--5275
4
U2
Cecil
5,00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
63.59
--5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Cam, Silage
19.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Bmad.
188
0.00
44
0.00
465.02
-5275
5
U2
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0.00
11
0.00
119.96
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Cam, Silage
19.1 Tons
2/15 b/30
208
0
20
Broad-
188
0.00
44
0.00
3,553.45
5308
1
U2
Lloyd
81.00
81.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
49
0
0
Broad.
49
0 Oli
I 1
0.00
916.72
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15.80
IS.80
Com, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
748A5
5310
1
U2
Cecil
15.80
15.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
200.93
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27.80
27.80
Cam, Silage
20.5 Tons
2115-6130
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0,00
47
0.00
1,316.89
5310
2
U2
Cecil
27.80
27.8D
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3/31
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
353.55
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/29/02 WLJT Page 11

0 .
Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
Tract
Field
Source
I_D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Ibs/A
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
lhs/A
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
I N
N I
Ibs/A I
1000
gal/A
tons 1
1000 gals
tons
5311
1
U2
I Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad,
97
0.00
23
0.00
215.03
5311
1
U2
Lloyd
9.50
9.50
Com, Silage
19.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
208
0
0
Broad.
208
0.00
49
0.00
461.10
53111
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Small Grain, Silage/flay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
54
0
0
Broad.
0
0.001
0
0.00
0.00
13111
2
U2
Cecil
19.20
19.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad-
144
0.00
34
0.00
645.17
5764
1
U2
Cecil
38.20
38.20
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
1,809,53
5764
Y
U2
Cecil
38.20
38 20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
911-3131
55
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
13
0.00
485.81
!Mon
Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
4,561.63
-
Total Produced 1000 gal tons
3,333.00
a
Balance 1000 eallons
-1 228A3
: -O
Manure Solids
Total ARplied, tons
&
18,859.44
Total Produced tons
Balance, tons
m'°
-18,fi53.94
Notes: 1. In the tract column. symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
895777 Database Version 2.0 Data Printed: 5129/02 WUT Page 12

0
The irrigation Application Factors for each Meld in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate vanes with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Arnount
(inches)
5239
10
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
101A
Cecil
0.40
1.00
$239
101B
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
11
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
112A
Cecil
0.40
1100
5239
112B
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
113A
Cecil
0,40
1.00
5239
113B
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
114A
Cecil
0.40
1100
5239
114E
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
115A
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
115B
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
116A
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
116E
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
117A
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
1178
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
119A
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
118B
Cecil
0.40
1.00
5239
11 SC
Cecil
0.40
1_00
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-29-2002 IAF Page 1 of 1

. The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
0
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Laddairy Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
19115
120
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
120
1
2
120
1
3
89
1
4
120
1
5
98
1
6
120
1
7
89
1
8
67
1
9
37
1
10
120
1
11
99
1
12
68
2
1
37
2
2
58
2
3
27
2
4
120
2
5
98
2
6
120
2
7
89
2
8
67
2
9
37
2
10
120
2
11
99
2
12
68
3
1
37
3
2
56
3
L 3
25
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 05-29-2002 Capacity Page 1 of 2

�J
0
0
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
ILadd Dairy Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/15
120
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
3
4
120
3
5
98
3
6
120
3
7
89
3
8
67
3
9
37
3
10
120
3
11
99
3
12
68
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 05-29-2002 Capacity Page 2 of 2

0 Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass
filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS
Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disidng after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste
is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Prinked: 05-29-2002 Specification Page 1 of 3

. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal
waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields
have been approved as a land application site by a 'technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways
that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed
waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
0 895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-29-2002 Specification Page 2 of 3

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
i disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other
restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop
sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH
shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimu
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
40 895777 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-29-2002 Specification Page 3 of 3

0
Summary of Changes
Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
Irrigation Plan
The existing plan was updated to include newly cleared acreage in existing fields and
meet New and Expanded System Rules required to increase herd size.
Existing Wetted Diameter from Nozzle Chart = 360 feet
New Wetted Diameter -360 feet x 90 %x 90% = 292 feet — used for external Ianes
Pull width = 234 feet existing lane spacing used for internal lanes
Pull Lengths in table have been reduced by 234 feet for stop and start end areas.
Table N75+ was used for start and stop end areas for single lanes.
Table NE70 was used for start and stop end areas for external lanes.
Table NI70 was used for start and stop end areas for internal lanes.
The existing equipment is the same as the original plan except a 1000 ft, hose is used and
a nozzle gauge has been installed.
Sloping terrain allows some curved lanes without crop damage.
Some over spray occurs onto reforested areas around the field. Sufficient buffer area
with grass or forest cover already exists around the irrigated area.
Acres Irrigated
Field 10 — 8.9
Field 11 — 64.7
Total Acres in Field
11.2
82.5

4r
!vx-
I- __-, I _L Arl
tee. rC',
W
7ti ot 7-
II
Ike
m 2. J4
im
r ir
_74 - PR-1--le I - 'K
rLs. v
1.1 A
4
444,
fr.1 o
F, Am I
n,
r•
At
-%Zy A
T' t
J9
ok
Mal
4L,
eg.
_Al
JOT.,
u t _3L
mbw
k- r
VC
A L I,.,, ..
7.7.
A rr
t V,
4­1 N jx
17, N
-W• -qwl
ig r
V.
T _ 44
7 A W.k ')L-
4 'If
7`�
-nj
TVL
- VOw)
Ril
ow MW I TI

Wetable Acres Work sheet
Traci No. Pull Number
f
Wetted
Dlameter
Internal
External
Ant
Angle
Pull Lenoth
Pull Width
Acres
Acres
Stop End
Acres
Start End
Total
Acres
1,4
6
5-1�
!D 1
-P
-1a�
�
a
/
6199
6.
6r*71-
44
a
a! Q
0.86
0.34
�.
!/
336
5'-z'2
o,36
8�
1
,
aQa
!
3b
91
21q
</,?
a
.
9a
.
336
g73
3.31
6.a,3
O,a8
3Vb
Y91
C.So
1l 3
b
619
-zV
S. -:b
o6. az�
O o78
3! �
a� a
�:
2
3-�
apa
3
,36
.34
1/ 4e
N
336
lip
s1/
6,911
as
o, a
A
11 7/4-.
45if
336
3��>
aQa
3,3-G
e�,26
Z
5z, 0
g�
V.:a
6,
�3
6
�!
c
194.
-ell
6• V43.

0
THRi W ELM(S ARE TO 6E LOCATEO AT
EVERT CF1AN E IN PIPE OiRECTION.
CTEES. ELBOW5, GUM E)TTRT PIPES,
HYMWS, DRAM. & END CAPS)
PIPE I5 CTEO SOR21 PR200
200e PRESSURE PVC
PIPE WSTALLATI€ N OFTH IS 36"- 42"
TREN04 WIDTH IS 24"
TO = THRUST BLODC
!I
DWIGA
ST[PP
Member
The Irrigation Association
f
ROME CARL LADD. SR DAIRY
Dale Ladd
SM Fox Hunter Rd
Harmony NC 25634
Pipe keg
— 6' Pima f,gle.t.d PVC Pip.
r P:i 91 PVC PW.
See Updated Photo Based
Irrigation Map
and Revised
Wetable Acres AVork Sheet
SprinWer / Valve key
_ NO - 4 + Trr4wi W.W fi 2£B
S' Flrp Iln.l G.i. Va iw
Wa Sppki
Gra-Mac Distributing C
2310 NC Hwy. 801 N
Moekrwille, NC 27028
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]M
Designed by: David Graham
Date 3-12 97
Scala I" jfj` Design No.

IRRIGATION SYI.& DESIGN PARAMETERS i
LandovwnerlOperator Name: Rome Ladd Sr. Daigy County: Iredell
Address: 521 Fox Hunter Rd
_Harmony NC 28634 bate: 3-7-97
Telephone: [phone] �-"-
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications'
Field
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Field'
{acres)
Sail Type
Slope
(11.)
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Hate 4
(inlhr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
cycle'
(inches)
comments
10
10
L rtyr2
6-10I
I
11
27
CfC2
L 6-10 lCorn
Silage/ Sm. Grain
.4 I
.75 I
"
12
35 {
CfC2 16-10
Korn Silagel Sin. Grain
.4 I
.75
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
i
i •
I
I
"
l
1
I
I
I
l
•
1
I
I
I
!�
I
I •
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
'Table to be completed in its entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
2See attached map' provided by the Field Office for field Iocation(s). -
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section A G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Irrigation Parameters
October 1995
page-1
USDA-URCS
florlh Carolina

"
ABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
0
Make, Model and Type of Equipment. Kifco/Ag--Rain E33A w/800' of 3.3" ID PE hose & Nelson SR150 Gun w/ 1.1 taper nnz.
Field No'
and
Hydrant Noe
Travel
Speed
(ft/min)
Z
Application TRAVELLANE Wetted
Rate Effective Effective Diameter
(inlhr) Yrdth (ft) Length (ft) (feet)
EWPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operatirig
Diameter Pressure. Pressure Are
(Inches) @ Gun (psi} @ Reel (psi) Patterns
Comments
10 IA
5.5 I
.37 I 234
540 360
1.1
70
Q
i at dam' i
10 1B
5.5 I
.37 I 234
455 360
1.1
70
11A 330
I
i
11 3A--1
5.5 I
.37 - 234 I
980 - 360
1.1
70
114 330
11 3B
5.5 I
.37 .234 I
750 ( 360
1.1 I
70 I
114 330
11 4A
5.5 I
.37 2
I114
I
11, 4B
5.5 I
.37 234 I
820 360 I
1.1
70
114 330
11 SA {
5.5 I
.37 234
980 - I 360
1.1 I
70 I
114 330
11 5B
5.5 I
.37 I 234 I
630 360
1.1
70 I
114 330
I
f ! I
l
I
I
1
12 2A
I 5.5
.37 234
I 580 360
1.1
ZO
114330
12, 2B
I 5.5
I .37 234
960 1 3601
1.1
I 70
I 114 I 330
I
12 6A
5.5
I .37 234
770 360
I 1.1
70
114
12 6B
5.5
.37 I 234
I 80 I360
1.1
70114
I
12 7A
I 5.5
I .37 234
610360
1.1
M114I110I
12, 7B
5.5
I .37 234
I 510 360
I 1.1
I 70
114 330
12 8A
5.5
I .37 234
I 820 360
1.1
70
I 11 I
I
12 8B
5.5
I .37 234
I 420 I 360
1.1
70
I114 330
6Lxp paM. at dgLigaW
I
I
'I
'See attached rriap provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
2Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degree of arc in degrees.
Irrigation Parameters USDA•NRCS
October 1995 page-2 Borth Carolina
nt
int

TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
9 9
Make, Model and Type of Fquipmenf:
Field Not
and
Line Not
Number of
Hydrants
welled Hydrant Spacing (fl)
Diameter Along Between
(feet) Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
(Whr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle operating operating
Diameter Pressure Time
(inches) @ Gun (psi) @ Hydrant (hr) Comments
I
f�
I
�
I
I
1
�II
I
II
1
I
I
I
I
� E
1
7
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
'Show separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in each field.
Irrigation Parameters -
USDA -sacs
October 1995 page-3 North Carolina

A
tW
TABLE 4 �- lrrigatit System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
krlgalion
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gprn)
295
XXX
operating Pressure at Pump (ps) Lagoon
Q
Design Precipitation Rate (In1hr)
.37
Hose Length (feet)
8W
xxxxxXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
Mech.
xxxMxx
Pump T)W (PTO, Engtne, Electric)
En ine &
XXX
Pump Porter Requirement(hp) Lagoon
35 $HP
{ XXX
,FM at aW F ield
{ 67
XXX
Field Pump HP
45 BHP
XXX
{
{
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications'
npsinner may nrnvide thrust hlnrk details an separate sheet.
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.)
90' Bend
9
Dead End
Tee
Hvdrant
9
Drains
9
Groun Entry Pipe
9
]see USDA-hRCS Field Mice Technical Guide, Sedion IV. Practice Code 430-DD.
Irrigation Parameters
October 1995 pager(
USDA -MRCS
North Carolina

IRRIGATIC SYSTEM DESIGNER
low —
Name: David Gkabam
Company: Gra-Mac Distributing Company
Address: 2310 NC HWY 801 N Mocksville NC 27028
Phone: [phone]
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
b. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7_ Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-A'RCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD,
B. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the '
designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval
of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip 25 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per DEHNR-DENT Code Section 15A NCAC 2B .0200 -Waste Not Discharged to Surface
Waters.
Irrigation parameters USDA41RCS
October 1995 page-5 North Carolina

Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
See attached sheets for additional Mgcifications and opgrations information.
Irrigation Parameters USDA-11RCS
October 1995 page-6 North Carolina

Models to choose from:
...40A.
4.0"
I/D x 1250'
E37A.
3.7"
I/D x 1050'
E30A
3.0
I/D x 1000
E25A.
2.5"
I/D x 800'
E21 A.
2*1 "
I/D x 660'
Extra tube can be added
to most models.
Ask your representative
for details.
Row Crop Gun Cart with galvanized body is
4atandard equipment. An optional Low Profile
.Cart is also available.
Nelson 150 Gun spraying dairy wastewater
Optional Equipment
Low Profile Gun Cart. Recommended to
reduce stream height and wind drift. (For
illustration see inside back cover.)
Pressure Sensitive Drive Shutoff.
Automatically stops the engine when the
supply pump Is stopped.
PTO Shaft. To dry rewind the tube by
means other than the engine.
Performance Information
Flow
'"•c"'°•
SPRINKLER
AREA COVERED
Model
GPM
Inlet
`'" PS�•
'Width
,
Presaure
PSI
wetted
Dla, ft.
Feet
lun it
E40A
300
97
70
371
316
1408
with
360
106
70
393
334
1417
NELSON
400
116
70
407
346
1423
SR2O0R
450
138
8o
429
364
1432
Sprinkler
500
150
80
443
376
1438
E37A
200
a6
70
314
267
1184with ._:
250
94
70
329
279
1190
NELSON
300
103
70
350
298
1199 °
SR15OR
350
115
70
367
304
1202 ;
Sprinkler
400
127
70
364
310
1205
450
.141
70 ; `
371
316
1208 J
E30A
180
94
60:
300
' 255 '-
1128
200
.102
60
307
261
1131
With
NELSON120
70
321
273
1137.
sR1ooR
240
129
70
329
°y 279 -
.1140
sprinkler
260
138
70
336
285 '
2
1143' ".
280
148,�70
336
=
1143 ,
E25A
80
75
. 80
229
�: 1"
897
100
82;
60
903
N'sow
120
92
60
257,219
":
`,909 rk
sR10OR
140
112
70
271
231
915
Sprinkler
160
124
70
286
243
921 F cc
180
137
70
300
255::
'928 r:
E21 A
60
67
50
'
214
782
" 1 a8
751 12
1
70
82
60
221
`
754
With
80
89
60
229
194�
757 r`
NELSON
SRIOOR
90
96
BO
236
200
780 .ry,.
t.;
spdnktar
1 Ei3
60
243
206
763
110 1
112
60
250
213
766 fi
Performance shown in the above tables are based on clean water. Actual performance may vary
depending on the solids content of the wastewater being applied.
'Recommended width is based on 85% of the wetted diameter. This width reduces the possibility of
excess application In the overlap areas. When using the machlne for Irrigation the recommended width
Is 70% of the wetted Dia.
Specifications"''
Model
E40A
E37A
E30A
E25A
E21A
PE tube I.D. (in.)
4.0
3.7
3.0
2.5
2 1'
PE tube length (ft.)
1260
4050
1000
800 , .:
660
Dry Weight (lbs.)
9240 .`
8240
4310
2500
1780;
Weight with water (Ibs)
16520
13120
7280
4200 -'-
2700
Tire Size
Shipping dim.: (ft. In.)
11 Lx15
12.5Lx15
9.5Lx14 6.70x15
4.80x12
Length
40
*9-10
18-0
*9-0
13-5
1"
Q:g
Width (8-3* wlo wheels)
7-5
6.9
5-10
Height
12-8
11-4
10-0
7-11
6-10
�Adj
600 S. Schrader Ave„ P.O. Box 290, Havana, IL 62644 t,
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
9ecausa of continuing product improvemenm pnotos of machines in this ieallat mry not he identleW to current momfion. the peftmanee mbmadon in this 1eEtllet is Caged an Iew conduCled under pgftlar Set of CordltlolL7.
Actuell field performance maY vary Imm this data tlepending on vanade rarcumsumm of ttme, place, weather, human jldgemaraand other lwon. SpeClAcatlons and prkee are %0ea to change Wleloutllotice.
GX9306SR-0 Pnnlad in u.s.A,

GRA-MAC, DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales -- Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
t
TELEPHONE. ADVANCE EXCHANGE
18101 p98.3232
M101 9S8 3800
NC TOLL FREE I-800.422.3560
Operations Guide
Ladd Dairy
System Start -Up (will require two people with radios)
2310 NC HWY. 801 N
MOCK5VILLE, N. C. 27028
1. Attach FRT94/35 PTO pump to hydrant in field and open hydrant amd--.-pump valves.
2. Attach traveler to FRT94/35 PTO pump and then slowly pull out traveler
hose. Be sure to observe all buffer zone areas.
3. Move John Deere power unit to lagoon and hook discharge hose to the
ground entry gate valve adapter. Open ground entry gate valve.
4. Place suction line into lagoon and prime power unit pump.
5. Start the power unit and leave at idle speed.
6. Raise the power unit RPM slightly and allow all of the air to evacuate
the system lines.
7. Raise the power unit RPM to reach the designed pressure of ± 110 PSI.
8. Start tractor and then raise RPM slightly.
9. Engage tractor PTO.
10. Raise tractor RPM until the designed pressure of ± 114 PSI is met on the
' traveler. ( since the pump is next to the traveler the pump PST should
read about the same (114))
11. Start the traveler motor and engage the drive.
12. Set the traveler to the proper designed speed of 5.5 Ft/Min (330 Ft/Hr).
13. Observe the gun arc to make sure it is set to 330 degrees.
14. Observe the entire system to make sure it is operating properly.
System Shut Down
1. The traveler will shut i1ts motor down automatically at the end of the
travel pull. The two exceptions to this are the hydrant pulls 1A and
8B. The pumps will need to be shut down on these two pulls prior
to the traveler.making a full pull.
2. After the traveler has made the pull. Lower the tractor RPM and
then shut off the PTO.
3. Lower the power unit RPM to idle speed.
4. Close ground entry gate valve.
5. Shut down power unit.

ki
GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales -- Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
4010) a98-3232
1910$ 998 3800
NC TOLL FREE 1-800-422.3550
Operations Guide
Ladd Dairy
Page 2 -- -
System Shut -Down (cons)
2310 NC HWY. 80t-N
MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 2702B
6. Close field hydrant and then move pump & traveler to next hydrant.
7. Follow system start-up.
Flushing
1. Flushing will need to take place after a pumping cycle is complete.
Do not allow the slurry to stay in the pipelines for more than a
week without flushing.
2. The flushing procedure start-up is the same except that the power unit
will need to be placed at the fresh water location.
3. Run the system until all of the end hydrants have been flushed clear.
(hydrant 5 & 8)
4. Follow system shut -down
Winterization
1. After the lines have been flushed, open all of the drains in the system.
(pumps, pipelines, traveler, etc.)
2. After the pipelines have drained, close the pipeline drain valves.
3. Open the FRT94/35 PTO pump discharge gate valve and leave open.
4. open the ground entry gate valve and'pour in a, small amount of anti-
freeze. This will help prevent freezing. Leave ground entry gate valve open.
5. Splash a small amount of lubricant into the pumps suction housing to
help prevent corrosion.
Maintenance
1. Follow all maintenance manuals supplied with the system.
2. Replace any worn or damaged parts as soon as possible
3. Grease hydrant stems at least annually.
4. Be certain to follow the waste utilization design strictly.

GRA - LAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design -- Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
19101 990.3232
19101 990.3800
NC TOLL FREE 1.800-422.3560
Specifications Sheet
Ladd Dairy
2310 NC HWY. 801 N
MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
1. Acres under traveler coverage is ± 75 acres.
2. Traveler is a Kifco/Ag-Rain E33A with 800' of 3.3" ID PE hose and a
Nelson SR150 Gun with a 1.1" taper bore nozzle.
3. Nelson SR150 gun performance with a 1.1" taper bore nozzle is 295 GPM,
3601 diameter at 70 PSI.
4. Travel Lane spacing is ± 234'.
5. Friction loss in 800' of 3.3" ID PE hose is 44 PSI.
6. Friction loss in 6" PR200 PVC pipe is .27/1001.
7. Liquid velocity in 6" PR200 PVC is 3.4 Ft/Sec.
8. Maximum pipeline pressure for 6" SDR21 PR200 PVC pipe is 144 PSI.
9. Pressure requirements are as follows:
Gun 70 PSI
800' of 3.3" ID PE hose 44 PSI
3600' of 6" PR200 PVC pipe 10 PSI
Elevation ± 110' 48 PSI
Miscellaneous 5 PSI
Total System Pressure 177 PSI
409 Head Feet
10. Application Rate is as follows:
96.3 X GPM 360 +
3.1 .9 x Radius i ARC
96.3 X 295 28409 - .34 In/Hr
3.1 .9x102 360 -824
t� 330 - 1.09 .34 x 1.09 = .37 In/Hr

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales -- Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE 2310 NC HWY. 801 N
19101 998.3232 MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
19101 998.3800 _ -
NC TOLL FREE 1.800.422.3580
Specifications Sheet
Ladd Dairy
Page 2
11. Travel Speed is as follows:
19.26 X GPM 19.26 X 295 _ 5682 65.63 In/Min
Lane Space x App. Rate ., 2� _�7'_ - 76: 58 -
5.5 Ft/Min
- 330.Ft/Hr
12. The system will require two pumps because of the 144 PSI maximum pipeline
pressure requirement. The lagoon pump will supply enough pressure to force
feed the field pump. The field pump will then boost the the pressure to
(41 the required level to operate the traveler at the designed rate.
0
13. The lagoon location pump must produce at least 110 PSI at 295 GPM.
14. The field location pump must produce at least 70 PSI at 295 GPM. The field
pump must also be capable of handling a total pressure in excess of 200 PSI.
15. The lagoon location pump is a Berkeley B4ETQB(SL) SAE slurry pump on a
4045T 115 BHP John Deere diesel power unit.
16. The maximums for the B4ETQB(SL) on the 4045T is 160 PSI and 600 GPM.
17. The horsepower requirement for the B4ETQB(SL) for 295 GPM at 110 PSI is t 35 BHP.
18. The 4045T will need to turn approximately 1800 RPM ;o achive the 295 GPM at
110 PSI requirement.
19. The field location pump is a Kifco model FRT94/35 1000 RPM PTO Slurry pump.
20. The pump maximums for the FRT94/35 are 200+ PSI and 600 GPM.
21. The FRT94/35 horsepower requirements for 295 GPM at 70 PST is t 45 BHP.
We recommend at least an 80 horsepower tractor for this pump.

North CC** Soda U*mly L a land- Departrnerrt of Cmp Science
W" Lmarsty and a carntltuart hawon
of The Ur6 rww of North Carof r e
C
A
College of Agriadture and Ufe Sdanoas
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27596-7520
919.5152647
919.515.7969 (fax)
Memorandum
TO: North Carolina Certified Technical Specia ists
FROM: ❑r. Jim Green, Chairman
NC State University Forage roduction Workgroup
DATE: June 29, 1998 �/
SUBJECT: Crop Management Practices for Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
The following is a four -page summary of suggestions for management practices for some
forage crops that can be used in waste management plans. These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC State University Forage Production Workgroup, a group comprised
of NC State faculty and NRCS agency personnel with expertise with the crops.
There are limited documented research responses of some of these practices on the many sons
and environments where these crops are currently being grown. The Forage Production
Workgroup has taken the available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that will allow farmers to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management plans. As data become available to
substantiate or refute these suggestions, the Forage Production Workgroup will make
appropriate changes.
Bermuda Overseeded With Cereal Rye anal Annual Ryegrass _
Cturently two types of `ryegrass" are being used for winter overseeding in fields used for
animal waste management. Cereal om is a winter annual smallgrain that looks similar to
wheat, barley and oats. Annual rygtrass is a winter annual grass that looks much like tail
fescue. Both of these grasses, when growing during the winter on bermuda sod, can have
significant impact on subsequent bermuda. yields. In effect, the total yields from an acre
growing the combination of bermuda with these winter annuals will usually yield between 1-2
tons more per acre than bermuda growing alone for the year. Therefore, the total amount of
PAN /acre for the year is about 100 lbs more than for Bermuda alone. Although cereal rye and
annual ryegrass are suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different
and thus practices implemented are dependent on the crop selected.

0
NO th C&*GW a Stir UrWV*Mty A a krKl- Department of Crop Science
WW rm.31y and a 00stALW9 raihdim
of The Lf MSty of North Urairs
Cdiege d Agriculture and Life Sciences
Campus Box 7620
RaWgh, NC 27695-7620
919.5152647
019.515.7959 (fax) -
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by .October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 Ibs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If rye
growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior
to heading or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for
shading Bermuda and reducing its yields. The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda
overseeded with cereal rye must be reduced in accordance with NRCS - Technical
Standard #590.
Annual Ryegrass
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3
inches tall) bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short
Bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 lbs/acre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30.
An additional 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda mist be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will
reduce bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is
required by heading or April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging
bermuda during April -May period. To favor the production of the bermuda, additional
harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
The PAN rate for grazed systems with bermuda overseeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.

North Camfm Stela Unma y a a land- Depa t wrtt of Crop Science
gwnt U*M5 y end a cwat hwi intttim
d The lfM r* of NoM Carolina
i
Ccdegs ct Agriculture and Us Sc:iancea
Campus Sox 7620
Raleigh, NO 27BOS-7620
919.5152647
919.515.7959
Eastern Gamagrass
Limited data are available on the response of gamagrass to various levels of N and soll types
in North Carolina. However, until further data is collected, the following guidelines may
be used.
1. On sandy textured soils that are well drain or excessively well drained, gamagrass may
yield similar to hybrid bermudagrass at similar PAN rates.
2. On heavy textured soils that are poorly to somewhat poorly drained, gamagrass may yield
1.5-3 times more than hybrid bermuda.
Gamagrass establishes slowly and will not usually produce much harvestable forage during
the establishment year. It is best to allow the growth during the seedling year to accumulate
for most or all season; if it is to be harvested, it should be done after full seedhead formation
on a majority of the plants. Therefore, PAN for the seedling year should be modified
accordingly. Overseeding gamagrass with winter annuals is not currently advised because the
harvesting or grazing management of the winter annual crops during February -April would be
detrimental to the survival of gamagrass. Gamagrass should not normally be harvested or
grazed below 6-8 inches stubble.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N needs per ton of
hay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay in the 24-
36 inch stage of growth, the N rate ranges from 40-50 lbslton of dry matter. The PAN rate for
grazed systems must be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard #590.
The application window for gamagrass is slightly earlier than for bermuda; gamagrass starts -
growing about 3-4 weeks earlier than Coastal bermudagrass and about 2-3 weeks earlier than
Tifton 44. Gamagrass is dormant from frost to March. The last application of PAN in the
summer should be prior to August 31.
Rescuegrass (i.e. Matia)
Rescuegrass is a cool season grass and makes most of its growth from M=h-June and
September -November. It should receive most of its N during the September -October and late
February through May months. Limited data are available for realistic yields of rescuegrass
on various soils and at various N levels in North Carolina. However, until further data is
collected the following suggestions may be useful
1. On sandy, well drained to excessively drained soils, rescuegrass may yield 1 S- 3 fines
fescue, assuming a uniform and dense stand of grass is present.

North Cw*m State Univer,ty e a Ynd• Depera mrtt of Crop Soiertoe
giant wv.nty end a wrafirt,art i:adution
of The Unire * at North Cam
•
�O
College of Agriatilture and Life Sciences
Campus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.515.2647
919.516.7959 (tax) -
2. On wet or poorly drained soils, rescuegrass may yield .75 -1.0 times as much as fescue.
3. On soils where both are well adapted the yields of rescuegrass may be 1-1.5 times more
than fescue.
The above RYE estimates assume that stand density is maintained through natural rewzding
every year. Although rescuegrass is a "perennial" it does not maintain dense, satisfactory
stands unless it is allowed to reseed every year. Even under this management it is likely that
disease will affect one or more growths in some years.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N needs per ton of
bay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay, the N
rate is similar to other cool season grasses such as fescue, ranging from 40-50 lbs/ton.
Rescuegrass may also continue some growth in June -August if moisture is available. During
these off-seasons, rescuegrass should not receive more than about 25 lbs N/acreJmonth. Only
apply 25 Is N/acre in June -August if the equivalent of 1-inch of water can be applied at the
same time. If the crop does not respond with at least a 1000 lbs of growth within a 3-5 week
period do not make another application until the plants have had the opportunity to use the
previous application.

0
10
WASTE UTILIZATI
PLAN�f
W wild only i'ad&0ma[ I=d:as RO bo Isam*4 *wj
RI, s, hereby give r�
please print (landowner) (waste producer)
permission to apply animal waste from his/her Waste Utilization System on
acres of my land for the duration of time shown below. The field(s) on
which waste can be applied are shown on the attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and
other trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or
crops. I also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial
fertilizer.
Landowner: Date: l�
Waste Producer: Date:
Term of Agreement: , I9mo , 20go'
alnlmm qj as Marrd ftww
(am Rcqu atfoa No. zJ
NOTARY
Z9A

s
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
0
t6
(0
(Mnyded MI.F it additiM" land has to tea leaaad, arc.)
hereby give 011.1 2fv"i55'v/J
permission to apply animal waste from his/her Waste Utilization
System on � �r acres of my land for the duration of time shown
below. The fields? on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
T 523q CU. It -t P4r4 ff-P F(d 12 .
r
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:r
A9V &
Waste Producer:
,6 C4'e44 -;.ec
to : 3 -13-q l
Term of Agreement: xmzecA / 3 _ _ ,19-21 to sari 1 20 9-9
Odale of TM Yon oa Coe Shmed hm*
(See Reored Sped lead" No. 2.)
311.13197
g6-er-C4L1
NOTARY
2.5

w. ...; 6
1
14
" I
R:
Facility Site Map
Ladd Dairy
Facility No, 49-14
jL
1'
l h

:: � � '. _d ' fl v17E- F ` �.,!Md41'yiYN N -
••. S. ,SK tLa'���4'" �.'..;'sj ���" � �' `-•tit At+ � �, i. w.%�:'�' S )'"§'�}
F��
CATEGORY
EXAMPLES
ACTION
CONTACTS
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff — 704-878-3180
full or partial loss of a Waste
property, contact 911 or Sheriff's Dept.
Storage Pond wall resulting in a
release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-873-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
5353
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor— Marvin Church
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
Grading
contain the waste on the farm
459 Fairmount Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
4. Contact the technical specialist who
704-876-4369
certified the Waste Storage Pond
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or Emergency Management at 704-663-
from base or sidewalls of Waste
1699
Storage Pond; waste discharging
from underground tiles
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
Local Contractor — Marvin Church
these may resulf in complete
technical specialist can assess situation
Grading
structural failure
704-876-4369
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat" category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single storm events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker

. _ E a a' �St _,; w ,ti... ,..... ys .v; b. i',➢,,..� _ -.
. 1" r �s5 . i'� �; • '`Y k�.,.s`` „76,`x _ S� .�ro� "4 �� �- �-�'--r> ',�T ' ' -� 5•�r- : �X ..a �.g '��.�s-.'
ritKti
r.x=fii. YiK
Waste Storage Overflow Runoff From Waste Leakage From Waste Leakage From Base or
Application Field Distribution System Sidewall of Storage Pond
* Add soil to berm to increase * Immediately stop waste * Stop recycle (flushing * Dig a small well or ditch to
elevation of dam application system) pump catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
* Pump wastes to fields at an * Create a temporary diversion * Stop irrigation pump back into Waste Storage Pond
acceptable rate or berm to contain the waste
on the field * Close valves to eliminate * If holes are caused by
* Stop all additional flow to the further discharge burrowing animals, trap or
lagoon (waterers) * Incorporate waste to reduce remove animals and fill holes
further runoff * Separate pipes to create an and compact with a clay type
* Call a pumping contractor air gap and stop flow soil
* Make sure no surface water * Other holes may be likewise
is entering lagoon temporarily plugged with clay
soil

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause F BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead . Dairy production BA Vegetative or wooded buffers
I Recommended best management practices
St Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered IA Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces Ib Promote drying with proper ventilation
LEI Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine 9 Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial Gf Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
•
Partial microbial
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or
•
Partial microbial
❑
Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
❑
Tank covers
•
Mixing while filling
❑
Basin surface mats of solids
Agitation when emptying
N(
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
hf
Agitate only prior to manure removal
I
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
r
Partial microbial
❑
Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces
decomposition
❑
Remove solids regularly
•
Mixing while filling
•
Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or
•
Agitation when spreading
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader
.
Volatile gas emissions
II
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets
LI
Proven biological additives or oxidants'
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Uncovered manure,
Cause
• Volatile gas emissions while
❑
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
91
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
l(
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
p
Extend fill fines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain
+ Agitation during wastewater
19
Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater
lagoon conveyance
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission
• Biological mixing
• Agitation
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation
nozzles Wind drift
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2
❑ Sump tank covers
❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon liquid level
❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives
Mr Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
d Minimum recommended operating procedure
❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
C Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Prac#ices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water • Improper drainage 1W Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access ffI Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System --Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3

insect Contra/ ChuMist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMPs to Control Insects Site S eciiic Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed
Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
1(
inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal Rf
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e,, inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal C' Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes
7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
59
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
9(
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
_hand!jga areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 2

Inad Ca*d Cheddirst for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids C7 Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
_ discharge _
Lagoons and. pits • Crusted solids C3 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation R1 Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders Feed spillage V Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
CAI Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, I996, page 1

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
If Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
1 stream or public body of water.
�J Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
i—J Complete incineration
Q 1n the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
T( Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animaI's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
0
0 December 18, 1996

PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: LADD DAIRY FARM
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 300 MILK COWS
50 DRY COWS
100 BRED HEIFERS
100 SMALL HEIFERS
50 DAY OLD TO 200 LB HEIFERS
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
Mac E gerton, Civil Engineer Technician
APPROVED BY: �z �u�� C�
DATE -
Revision ##1 - The waste storage pond was constructed larger
than designed. Site topography allowed larger pond
construction without adding much cost. The Ladd's also
request to modify the waste management system prior to 0.200
certification. They attest to DWQ that expansion was likely
within the next year or so. The Ladd's indicate that DWQ
recommended that the waste management system be modified for
greater numbers subsequent to 0.200 certification if
possible. This revision increases milk cow numbers from 115
to 230.
Revision #2 - On June 9, 2000, Larry Hendrix indicated that
the Ladd's request revising their waste management system
for additional heifers fed on the feedlot at the dairy barn.
This revision increases bred heifers from 37 to 40 and small
heifers from 40 to 80.
Revision #3 - The Ladd's are expanding by adding a freestall
barn. A new milking parlor has recently been constructed at
this farm. This revision updates cow numbers and parlor
wash water volumes. The storage period was reduced from 6
months to 4 months with the additional cattle, parlor water
and drainage area.
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02

0
0
0
INDEX
I. Waste Production
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Clean Water Exclusion
C. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
D. Waste Utilization
E. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1.
Normal Runoff for 120 day period
2.
Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3.
25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
5.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
G.
Waste Volume
7.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump
out elevation and ESW elevation
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails and Filter Areas
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrients
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan

0 Appendix
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Aerial Photo
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Check of Design using Computer Program, S
Operation and Maintenance Plan
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Drawings
System Plan View
pages
1 of 1
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02

0
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Production
300 cows will be milked on the Ladd farm. Polluted
runoff from concrete lots and lounging areas are controlled.
Runoff from the feedlot area is also controlled. Manure and
parlor water are collected.
50 dry cows, 100 bred heifers and 100 small heifers
will be fed on the lot. Cows on lot have free access to a
lounging barn bedded with shavings. A new freestall barn
will be constructed to house cattle. Cows have some access
to lounging areas.
II. Waste Management objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
. A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
A waste storage pond located near the milking parlor
and feedlot and stores manure, milking parlor wash water and
polluted runoff. The Waste storage pond is located over 100
ft. from the nearest well. The waste storage pond is
located no closer than 350 ft. from any residence other than
the owner or his tenants.
Irrigation will be used to empty this pond.
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage pond to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02

C. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Livestock shall be fenced out of waste storage pond.
Safety rails shall be installed at Push Off Ramp. Fencing
will be changed to remove cattle from draws and below
concentrated feed areas. These filter areas will infiltrate
part of the first flush and filter sediment and organic
particles.
A stock trail'is located from feedlot to the dry cow
and bred heifer pasture located above silos. The area
downstream of stock trail and waste storage pond shall be
maintained in a grass sod. This will allow runoff from silo
to be filtered and will provide a place for clean water to
be diverted.
D. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
E. operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
4o maintaining the system. An operation and maintenance plan
is attached.
Fj

III. Waste Storage Pond for Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 120 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Iredell County.
Drainage Area = 65,667 sq ft Surface = 49,895 sq ft
Unsurface = 15,772 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
%
DEPTH
%
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 4 months:
November through February Surface Runoff Depth = 7.8"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 3.32"
Surface Runoff= 7_811* 49,895 sq ft= 32,432 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff=3-32* 15,772 sq ft = 4,364 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surfaces
14.31 - 6.7 = 7.6" = 0.6 ft/4 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff = 4.9111 * 65,667 sq ft = 26,869 cu ft
12"/ft
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
• Rainfall = 5.511 = .5 ft

5. Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.5 ft
6. Waste Volume
300 milk cows and 50 dry cows are typically on the lot
area approximately 80% of time. The estimate of manure
collected is 80%. 100 bred heifers and 100 small heifers
will be on lot approximately 50°s of the time.
300 milk cows + 50 dry cows = 350 cows
Volume = 350 cows * 1.4 gal/day/cow * 120 days * 801c
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 62,888 cu ft
Volume = 1.00 bred heifers * 10 aal/day/head * 120 days * 50%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 8,021 cu ft
Volume = 100 small heifers* 3.5 gal/dayfhead * 120 days *50'1
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 2,807 cu ft
Total = 62,888 + 8,021 + 2,807 = 73,716 cu ft
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
• i. Pipeline and milker wash water 480 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 30 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water 600 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water __ ^s}gal - /
1,160 gal./day
Volume = 1,160 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 120 days
= 18,610 cu ft
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
32,432 cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
4,364 cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
26,869 cu
ft
4.
Waste Volume
73,716 cu
ft
S.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
7R,r'1n (->>
ft-
TOTAL
155,991 cu
ft
4.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
0.6 ft
5.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5 ft
6.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
Stage
1.5 ft
TOTAL
2.6 ft
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02
0

E
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
Is 114' X 254'
2.6'
2:1 \ 1 8.4' / 2:1
70' X 210'
Volume = 8.4/6[70' *210'+103.6'*243.6'+ 4(86.8'*226.8')]
= 166,155 cu ft
Volume OK. Approximately 10,000 cu ft for solids
accumulation or volume unable to be pumped.
Normal Pump Out Volume =
32,432 cu ft + 4,364 cu ft + 73,716 cu ft
+ 18,610 cu ft + 0.6' * 114' * 254'
= 146,496 cu ft per 120 days
445,592 cu ft per year
= 3,333,000 gal per year
= 122.8 ac-in per year
Maximum pond level
0.5' + 1.5' + 26,869 cu ft/(104' * 2441)
3.1' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 3.1 ft below the top of dam elevation of the
pond. The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.5 foot
below the top of dam elevation.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond. The District Conservationist will design all
diversions. Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25
year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store some sediment.
0

B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails and Filter areas
The stock trail consist of 9" of compacted ABC stone
over a specified type of filter cloth. The stock trail
shall be fenced. Runoff from these areas and lounging areas
are directed across well maintained grass sod. The stock
trail and lounging areas are located to provide the maximum
grass filter possible. Filters shall be maintained between
lounging areas and drainage ways. Filters shall be 100 ft
wide. Swells or diversions shall be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to kick water into filters at
frequent intervals.
A. Bred Heifers Cows and Dry Cows
100 Bred Heifers and 50 dry cows have access to pasture
located above silos. To access this area, a stock trail is
located from feedlot to lounging area. Grass will be
maintained on steep hillside below stock trail.
Manure will be collected and spread annually from the
lounging barn. Note: Most of manure will be collected on
concrete that will be scraped to waste pond.
Volume
Manure = 150 cattle * 110 cu ft/animal/3 months *12mon.* 10%
6,600 cu ft = Approx. 205 tons
B. Bred Heifers and Small Heifer Group
100 Small Heifers are in pasture and will be fed silage
on concrete at back of barn. The lot will be scraped daily
into the slurry pond.
C. Day old to 200 lb Heifer Group
50 young heifers are kept in hutches and small lots
near the milking herd. Very little manure is collected from
this area. Grass filters are maintained below this area.
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02

Fj
0
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for milking herd will be stored in a waste
storage pond for approximately 4 months and will be
irrigated.
During the course of one year, this facility will store
122.8 ac-in per year of slurry waste. Daily scraping of
waste is required to move the waste into the storage
facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at
other parts of the farm:
Dry Cow and Bred heifers (Lounging Barn) 6,660 cu ft
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from stock trails and lounging areas are
diverted through grass filter areas. Grass sods are
maintained all year round. These areas may be controlled
grazed in late spring and early fall when ground is dry.
Weeds may require chemical control or periodic bush hogging.
Grass filters 100' from the ditch banks will be fenced and
maintained in a good grass sod.
C. Nutrients
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Pond
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL 7402SP'q AVbTT.,ART,R NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 56,675 lbs. 0.40 22,670 lbs.
P205 35,543 lbs. 0.70 24,680 lbs.
K20 53,457 lbs. 0.70 37,420 lbs.
185 lbs PAN per ac-in
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02

b. Other Manure around the Farm
j)TgPOSATiT,i('Z„SSF.,q AVA_TTA_BLF _N_TTTRTPN_T_
(nutrient availability)
N 2,049 lbs. 0.43 881 lbs.
P2O5 1,288 lbs. 0.70 902 lbs.
K2O 1,786 lbs. 0.70 1,250 lbs.
4.3 lbs PAN per ton
C. Total Available Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 23,551 lbs
P2O5 25,782 lbs
K2O 38,670 lbs
40
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02

VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan
l
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage ponds and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond for .manure reaches a
point 3.1 feet below the top of the dam, the storage pond
shall be emptied. A post will be set with its top at this
elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be checked
and repaired as required.
0
Revision #1, 9-23-98
Revision #2, 7-06-00
Revision #3, 4-22-02
40

Y r fi •`d ( r
r � Il. # rF %1 yd h<. h}+ �y€ � r5.'y 4 r,i •�'y. �-0,
F�� 1, � z •TM y° f rr" ra � ,,y k'
I'N11
" :1WM�"�`K}f ' 't •.� ['.�.�°' � '� �#; .k �. '�j'r `},✓ i�'pr a r ..I f'T � i�SI,Aa' ktlr{4'<�4� 5�4, y � ',
!
' u !' " T ��r.a , , r ". f` },, " Rs F t ,'i I 'k4ri Iw' '+I`f' Y'A�t'
: s. '„ r 4 r.: �,t , v i�" } A" .0
i�
2 rF ` ~{7x LF 1 .wx siii I..... "Fel.
lf4. 4
4l rj-
4d'al A. •IkV'I , 't.:',. m .lu, d '' Sy �'# 'F -'z»; " s t
i�rr "
•vF � ,'�, r' �,_ ^IF _ F.: "k 1 � l ii:� €o h , +, 44 � �,.«.- s r..,$Ip' ''=m
Ail kl
kI
r ,i
Ty p wel+ a,fE•.C.I .� _ _ yf¢ "�`
4 S y^ x T,w
sF'„9W t ' :� �" ri 7 °I€ € I gyylwy ';I Aoi
rk .. ..,.� o k S ' k t 41
y € � �4a - ,.: � .��' .. k e.. € - l � � ,�,:` I 8 ,, ;: h {i +tln:. ri ; 'r1 �• Y r€I [: �. , 'I t li rp —, .
::I. "•k' 4, 'S E ::. n`w' ,. II,r s ...re „M1.+ kfa
a,�:gf {tk h v
II r
e ,•.R +"�.P r*'��i ' * nr,: y �f 1#'•,.'r I. < €�'•"' la ,u€ t":?.ks... .
OA.
r a '. 4, J" �� �� �; is.s ,u • "'S : 1. ., •',w '� $ .: o >�AI @ ��" Nn} t ;��'�' I r '�' ���` '
� r ".^� I Tl r rY _• � i,1, � t �u y�-F'��.ay;. 1. i � 'rdr tin Fi•���r h.:I nlF,l. (9'I le.,y
I C
n
€ ': ; t i 1� 4 •, {� '.i I '. r S V � !€: f�4 Y' � I rvrH kl•.v
4.0 a 1 Jv4,'Il.' I € hY4 '�': iy, ri 'w,•k, '�'� dy :� I '
� � � 1� €€; .1 w $N€ r, py��Yr, I,., � 'A ' 9v!!��k�.' f� d•+ �1,, �, � : r f i.
-ARID".
rD
r
r Rx€ F
4d Iii
4�5'� • , 1 s� . rd�; :. � 'L: � . I,fi�i a � ; ° � �, ° 1 { ^'" y€ E� r l "�;`b. 'M i' '�i � c. +p� �f iaY rs:l-�- 1 ;, � '. ,K �'.-,.( } � .. I € r I: •. "II� ld ,.'..
.ai<,Y� I L�. f v; t FnE, �.y. I p .",1� r�, �:� �' "jlr.d M1 r Vi { e # • € �e fia'i i" naw,�' 9r f
€. ! a�� �r '. � -€�w�r w�
:E s
!1'; f *11 "�Y t J� r k < kka•'� - rT '' ^"'`+.' .. ,,,` 4 x ! m .k 4 IF._' a V �..
S Y'n�j � �� I F, •�, ; d ��l �€ X1� , € ;T �p"t$k� 7� �r 1C 1 F r� '�„ ' , � VAS ,: f:q�.,1 V Ji., : rur��' }! fi i ., N I
,h � "� ��'� i '§ � :�C a ..S r flit :. e df r ,N .. ..1 , ;.4 '�R '�i� , a:��,6'` � } 4' ,n, �. 7' aryuryk! I ' • �V N€ ',�I'' jra. ';
OVA
f i°I I,
ta
't ry s' +' '� Y€ v •n ".�' i W^.'d":,, €y` • 1d Ie
��� � ''I ! I � � 4 ��. �I41 a y »VS 'aa} .t' � � '�. ��l -,�. ".�� � � � € �•�r :� .�}r ,Y #P
jj _•i-•. .�.. fie'' v<. �-.4 ,tyv r n_ ' ,.,<.�:k 1, h', 1L ..LL ..r
t y L
14 f1f3f� r ..y �: ,.k p E € s 11 r I kfl I�'�i �f•1'r
:�
. a;e y�,. F, �S�' z kk'M €' e r'• "fYyS��� ry It i! :'. I5i"f. AV � ,��
SK
i$'t8$Y
,kid
.i_ �'1 rn,E I .M,y`# Syr i.
44
f i Y 4'd,:rl 'R ����..jS l� ,. :. € aX 1 � ,:.�`i•�1� �..Y•
tv
7.4
r
Y
»
w
44 +� f _tl j _ _ y - .5C :: "`FF. i A l apf j
1 n
m4.n,r� Il
q,_Sa€t
Ali r , a
�` 'fin+ 1 m,r'
l}T •�s •'_FF €
o
,mod s

'�✓ '[.� '.^` }, z . ..�!'. 7 rr"`R _, �. ; flr. i r71
- ! .- � ' `' y , ��� ✓ � � f 1. V l l L.] /j I .5
77, �`f'� ItiJ� (I 'I `� . rl•. ± J i r :� / , -.�y •':�.;
11. 4..^ 1: ;r � � y ,'•', ;1 I1:F } ��`iliV rf f^ -` I f';��;: _- ' rr
�,-
I
.. 1r v" �'�J{i 'Z` L'`���r� �C�� 1 \ 4 �=•: 111 �k /``� \�'?,'I YC•+..> e"'$ 0
�`'k-`+ CIT�' •1'I' V v \ !ji! - � ll��-� h- - ��, 1 r/'.. i �j/ � /" �I ti\ ?rr.., ,...
.tip r_ �f\ , ` V ' fl / .t�l ' ! rr.. �• ',.
R9tT n�• � :'' f— ,.���1--`:
y, r� 'l�rh { ``5' /,♦ I-'"r•,�^? -1 ..../ oft
.+. �,��,�j ".� l � > > '•*.,`' � �' , fr, � rs 1 I.'. �i '� - it ��Lr } ]f'`
+ : �Jr r /•' � } 11 ( I l / a�, � ,/ _ � n .l l �. __ �! „ �!
-:1 i !"] I+[I 4 - �_p l� ,... � SSJ �' � -•r J i� � I # f/ r$!� l,� }i,.f r'�� - 1 S ,�9t!• ; _
.:��y `+.' ' �r t ,6 � i,� •� - f ,a;g,,._ -.` G.7,I�4� � �,..I .� �'� }: �!I -. L / lr i :: J
)f/� ��� .�i � °� \��t, �,ff1 i-h � fr�r �fyv r� �,� 1;' Lf�l :4r1 t �Fr �{! S' �, �✓../�.r f � ��-�.
r: Jf �r!'.� � 4y.-r• J __ Z 'r '�-- w ,:�r ��i / ,% •� - i:, �','.-r I � /'-�' �}; �'q.
4;H '.���il�+ � rF. l,� r o45. � ✓r,- �` _�, �r l R
14 ! J I�•, �.` ! t� I ��i� i�l� F\ jrl rkh "f�r { f F F, * f l' S� �r -_ri" - "� �+ rn,.�-
7 ,
- /SI J I � :� !'. � �, A� '� 1 k9% ..ter `.�•�} _ �f r. �'` '�- - - i I it �
26
��.•� � 'J � r .. � i r r'`, ._ II �i ,�;� r It I ✓ � vx f ' s ,
SI � �r f `ff�.:�.,� _. f ' ��� � / _ f' I, j - �/r•, '.;�, _ -,f�/' � ll;i.�' �+-• �' �v - .� by ..r ➢ -�' � f, I '-- �-
�, �` rf� 1( i�i ��'�` �L LiC�;.Oai ♦'S ! r 1 '+
�
f':i:f � ...� y ^� , // 9�i1�"3eF`�� S'!�.' k" r.-- Ad \ � �• F_..��
!-:�% � .. {� l . , a.t r.,t � � . lr � ;✓�/� f � ,E,I E`�`'s ;:: c' � r � �� lr '� \ ..:. ��
/(2129
/� \ r •'! !
II 3 1
fy% / E
'W' i fix: `� 4 ✓'�� r 41
• �, fi 41
K0.IJ �✓ %
( f�.,J•r�.3M is r l S
Name: CALAHALN J Location: 0350 57' 07.5" N 080° 43' 23.4" W
©ate: 4/15/2002 Caption: Ladd Dairy
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Iredell County, North Carolina
opynglit (G) 1997. maptem Inc.

Attachment 5
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM
FOR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE USE ONLY
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGYIDIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
STATE SITE NUMBER:
1. SITE NAME(S): _ aynr L CA k ........ -
Z. INSTITUTION: A- C 3. DATE RECORDED:
4. RECORDER: _ L-arCe M.,zky-; i - - — — -- - -- —
S. PROJECT NAME:
CLIVIA
S. COUNTY: 7. USGS QUAD IMAP: Ct Qt,5 a
S. DIjRJE�CTIONS TO SITE: _ _ F, er l gajit Le' .,,,,t,
j2 _4tgi�__ �)Z 21 Zvi kn )(, ) o-c .t r� Yl e �.,r H � rt 4-► nai CYe ie k
9. DESCRIBE TOPOGRAPHY:
r_tt+�.� � [_1MS �.► �t S l i� P n S' ��� �� to ,/� A trfn •� / S?7 � � ,�,.,ra S-r�na�1 r '�'v�.s �.�..,
10. SOIL MAP UNIT: C C � S« vc 00De 9 44t Q
11. DESCRIBE VEGETATION/VISIBILITY: r.:.:,.... �•
iZ. SITE D£SCRIPTION/DLNSIONS: , 2 3 Ira ad�«.c�A•..
13. LIST ARTIFACTS: P1�;�, :l <.t hr► on 1 8 bC
T [ l Sri,
��.*.fit, 5'I�•►y,� �, _ .- _.
14. CULTURAL COMPONENTS: (check) PREHISTORIC: HISTORIC
15. OWti'ER AND/OR TENANT; DIFORMANT: i 1G m o LaAtl �r►-
�t Lowc/
ADDRESS:
521 ! .f vmtcr- & _ PHONE: (LO ). —� ZLZ,�
�tar^lo�� N. C. a8"G3
> > > ATTACH PHOTOCOPY OF THE SECTION OF L;SGS SHOWING SITE LOCATION < < <

I
0
0
United States Natural
Department of Resources
*' Agriculture Conservation
Service
WASTE KANAGEMENT FACMM SITE EVALUATION
G&NERAL U4VOILMATION
NAME 7Com e-. dd ' r
S
TELEPHONE 74f- S ilr► - .Z/
LOCATION Z-d de/% Coar� l�y
SIZE OPERATION A.3 D L+.Ow
LOCATION DATA
DLSTANCE FROMNEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER 16 G a FT.
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PL"BLIC FACILITY (UbwL dmr* era) y / b p FT.
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAINT
YES _ NO
If yes, NRCS cannot provide assistance
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A. -BLUE LINE^ PERENNIAL STREAM?
YES NO
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN I MIL= ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY?
YES _ NO ✓
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval.
ARE u nTTiE3 IN CONSTRUCTION ARPA?
YES— NO
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Englaeeting Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON -CROPLAND? YES „ NO Y
If yes, producer must complete Form NRCS-CPA--38 (Request for Certified
Wetland Determination/Delineadon}
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES NO
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, rr IS THE RESPONSIBIL= OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF
ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY LAND UN'TI. A WETLAND DELINEATION
IS MADE.
MRCS will provide technical assistance•in wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland
inclusions less than one acre in size. MRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values lost are fully
mitigated, For natural wetlands greater than one acre in size. MRCS will provide assistance only after a
rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimization of Impacts, and compensatory mitigation is
carried out in that order of preference.
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WrM PRODUCER:
• PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION?
• PRECHARGING LAGOON WrM FRESH WATER.40 AT LEAST (17
OF THE CAPACITY? WRl t%. 5Y? r� f"L yO�.
• USING GOAD SOUND AMCMENT IN LAND APPLICATION
OF W AM?
YES NO _
YES YO A11.4
YES it NO
NC-CPA-17
REV, 1, 2.96

NC-CPA-1 7
I
0
0
IS ENDANGERED A.2MMOR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESLYI'>
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PUNNING AREA OR
WILL PUNNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA?
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL, SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED AREA?
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE. STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT FARWANDS IN THE
OPERATING UNIT?
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING?
If the answer to any of the above Is yes, MRCS will not provide technical
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY ALL WASTE
INCLUDING SLUDGE. ALTHOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
IF NO. DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? )V%
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE?
(Attach Waste Udltttatiott Plan to site evaluation.)
REV. t, 2-96
Page z
YES _
NO ✓
YES
NO
YES _
NO ✓
YES ✓
NO
YES
NO f
NO,
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
SOIL INVESTIGATION- VALID ONLY IF SOIL 1NVESTLGATION
SKEer AITAC MD
13 SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGAAN? j45R YES ✓ NO
IS ALINER REQUIRED? YES No —
TYPE OF LINER TO BE USED: CLAY Y' BENTONITE ,,,,` SYNTHETIC_
LF CLAY LINER LS TO HE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVArr s,L.,e ON YES ✓ im _
SITE?
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE YES NO _ )V 1A
ACCESS TO CLAY?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? YES ✓ NO
(Attach sail investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT? YES NO bo/
(1fM the must be removed or plugged)
SITEAPPROVED YES NO_ CONDITIONAL_
COMMENTS
THIS SITE 24VESTEGA7ION IS VALID FOR TWELVEMONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRUCTION
HAS NOT SEEN STARTED WMIIN TWELVE MONTHS. A NEW SITE LIMSTIOATION WILL BE REQUIRED. Y
SIGNATURE DATE
F Changes in the local or state law or ciwnges in the standard could require a new site investigation.

■■■IM■MI■MINE MEN ■MIMMMM�
No iM■■■■■ N■■ N■■ENES■
of
■■ ■NEEM .. ... ■■■■IM1■■E■■
■■■MI■■r■r■■■.■
■■■r■r■■r■■M.E
■■■■SYa� ■M■■rE
iii"n©nUUM o0o m ®IMM m omlm'mo o©�oio
ISIMM
mrsou■jum■.S■■■AMMON."■■■■■0
®' MIMI1MEN■OME00■EONNEA■'ER
MOM EMINKNO
small REIMrimii,rM1rM1r:11111rms:ommsn;m
ir71■1■■1 "MEN 11■■■MEN m■;■!■m■■'mm
1M.U111JINEMENEON N000NONE NoNO!

TYPES OF MATEMIAL ENCOUNTERED IN WRINGS
._ . _ _ ... . _ .. _ ...y. ....._ [Ua� lens• of ey�t�rnx hrlowj .. ._ _... ,,.,,
-- ••- UNIFIED CLASSIFICATICIN
-USM CLASSIFICATION --
GW - WeI1 griided wavels: gravel. sand min
GP - Poorly graded WAV'ria
GM •Silty pravei4; gravel stand -Kilt mix
GC-Clavey gravels; grave! -sand -clay mix
it - gravel
t s -sand
vis-v*ry fine sand
sl • sandy loan
SIN - Well ltraded sands: sand -gravel Dais
isl -fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands
SM -silty sand
SC -Clayey sands; nand -clay misttlris
ML - Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clavey silt
l - Loan
gl - gravelly loam
si - silt
sil -silt loans
CL -Clays of low to madium plasticity
CH -Inorganic clays of Dish plasticity
cl -clay loam
j sicl-silty clay loos
MH - El•st is silts
j scl -sandy clay kwm -
OL-Organic silts and silty clays. low plasticity
OH -Organic clays. siedium to high plasticity
sic -silty clay -
a -clay —
L Suitable material for ambanimant is available we rlmba.ir wftm snow an she sko*y .s -
wrwr r+mr
REMARKS:
L EttplwA bazar& requiring spatial attr.ntiao in drnwn
�n GtY;� I���� !ytf�k ��Ylar •✓1 S19,tci�� �t,+i"t� .
a�5 Y•e i S 1� G fM i arro w ce 'q ,
GENERAL REMARKS: '
24
26.
2s
27
?a
2q
30 31 3! 3s 34
36
36
37
3a 39 40
41,
42
42
44145
4s
47148140160
51

Evaluation of Soils for Use in Dam Construction
. Rome Ladd Farm
By: Sam Bingham, Civil Engineer, NRCS
A bathtub style clay liner will be constructed in the
waste storage pond embankment (ie see design drawings.)
MRCS will check the depth prior to backfill. All trenches
shall be dewatered prior to placing earth fill. Any organic
layers on the foundation surface shall be removed to placing
earth fill.
. All alluvial material suitable for use in the dam
construction must be placed in downstream slope of darn. Any
material with rock greater than 5" in size shall be wasted
outside the embankment on the downstream toe of the dam or
rock shall be sorted from the fill material prior to use.
Clay material (MH, SC, or CL) shall be used for clay
liner construction.
COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS
Maximum thickness of layer before compaction is at, or
less. Compaction is equivalent to or better than the
following. A sheeps foot roller shall be used for
compaction. At least 6 passes shall be made over each lift.
The clay liner material shall be placed at optium plus 2t
moisture content.

U. 4• Uepartment a; Hgricutture
Soil Conservation Service
nV—cau—.rr
September 1980
File Code: 210
.HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR VMS
andownerQrllP L4 Countye�e
Community or Group�.,..�_ —..
e No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water „to Top of Dames Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation - ZZ- -
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstreaps to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
•
..
-Est.,Elev
. :Est.
evati on
:...
:.
'Kind of
.'Improvements:
-of Breach
Reach: Length:
Width:
Slope:
Land Use
Improvements
: Above M oodwater above
0.:
. :
• -
:. Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
t.
.cost"c
Ft.
hunt
Ft.
•
Ft.
•
2 • jean
jo��:
3 -�'
5kwz
- Y►av�r
i -•—
- •'
—
4S
Describe potential for loss of life an�damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breachg e
Hazard Classification of Dam `lam b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) a —
Dam -Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)
By
Concurred B
Date .6 G 96
y [.i,-clam!�*,Date ON--
e to
MOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.

Animal Waste Management Plan
Designed By: Sam Bingham
Date: 04/12/2002
Farm Information
Farm Type: Dairy
# of Operating Periods: 2
prepared for Ladd Dairy
Checked By:
1st Operating Period: November - February
2nd Operating Period: March - October
Climate Data
State: NC
County: I redell
Station: 1
25 Year - 24 Hour Storm Event: 5.5 inches
Lagoon Loadings:
Barth KVAL: 0
Anaerobic Load Rate: 0 Ibs VS/1000 cu. ftlday
Load Rate For Odor: 0 lbs VS/1000 cu. fVday
Date:
Month
Rain (in)
Evap, (in)
January
3.70
1.70
February
3.86
1.60
March
4.51
3.10
April
3.35
3.80
May
3.86
3.90
.tune
4.19
4.40
July
4.70
4.30
August
4.83
3.90
September
3.82
3.20
October
3.44
2.40
November
2.95
1.70
December
3.80
1.70
Totals
47.01
35.70
AWM Page 1

Animal Data
Animal
Quantity
Weight
Manure
VS
TS
Manure
VS
TS
lbs
cu.ftldaylAU
ibs/daylAU
Ibslday/AU
cu.ftlday
Ibslday
Ibslday
Dry
50
1400
1.30
8.10
9.50
91.00
567.00
665.00
Heifer
100
1000
1.30
7.77
9.14
130.00
777.00
914.00
Lactating
300
1400
1.30
8.50
10.00
546.00
3570.00
4200.00
Small Heifer
100
350
1.30
7.77
9.14
45.50
271.95
319.90
Totals
550
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
812.50
5185.95
6098.90
Locations
P u r 1000 lbs
Percent of Manure Deposited in Each Location:
1 st Operating Period: November - February
Location
Dry
Heifer
Lactating
Small
Heifer
Waste Pond
80
50
80
50
Totals
80
50
80
50
�nd Operating Period: March - October
Location
Dry
Heifer
Lactating
Small
Heifer
Waste Pond
80
50
80
50
Totals
80
50
80
50
AWM Wage 2

Additions
Vaste Water VS Loading: 12.9 Ibs/1000 gal/day
1 st Operating Period: November - February
Waste Streams
Wash Water
Flush Water
Bedding Type
Amount
--- Units
gal/day
gal/day
lbs/day
Waste Pond
1160.00
0.00
0.00
2nd Operating Period: March - October
Waste Streams
Wash Water
Flush Water
Bedding Type
Amount
--- Units --->
gal/day
gal/day
Ibslday
Waste Pond
1160.00
0.00
0.00
•
AINM Page 3

Runoff
6unoff Volume Method:Enter Monthly Runoff Volumes
Impervious Area: sq. ft
Runoff Volumes (1000 cu. ft.)
tx-
Pervious
Impervious
Monthly Totals
January
7.69
0.97
8.66
February
8.98
1.27
10.25
March
10.31
1.42
11.73
April
7.82
1.10
8.92
May
9.15
1.17
10.32
June
10.44
1.49
11.93
July
11.73
1.58
13.31
August
12.27
1.97
14.24
September
10.48
1.60
12.08
October
8.87
1, 35
10.22
November
8.86
0.97
9.83
ecember
9.02
1.14
10,16
Total
115.62
16.03
131.65
25 Yr-24 Hr
26.87
0.00
26.87
Storm
�'A
1�
0LO
AWM Page 4

Management Train
taste Pond --> Storage Pond #1
Runoff -----> Storage Pond #1
11
0
AWM Page 5

Waste Facilities
torage Pond #1
Desicn Dimensions
Shape:
Top Dimensions:
Bot Dimensions:
5ideslope:
Storage Depth:
Final Depth:
Freeboard:
Rectangle
114.0 ft x 254.0 ft
70.0 ft x 210.0 ft
2:1
8.4 ft
11.0 ft
1.5 ft
Water Budget (1000 cu. ft�
Desicn Quantities
Depth of 25 Yr. Storm:
5.5 in
Depth of Precip Minus Evap:
7.8 in
Waste Volume:
159465 cu. ft
Permanent Add'! Storage:
650 cu. ft
Storage Period:
4 months
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
Waste Volume
23.33
21.82
23,33
22.57
23.33
22.57
23.33
23.33
22.57
23,33
22.57
23.33
275,39
Runoff
8.66
10.25
11.73
8.92
10,32
11.93
13.31
14,24
12,08
10.22
9,83
10.16
131.65
Prec-Evap
433
5.45
3.40
0.00
O.DO
D.DO
0.97
2.24
1.50
2151
3.02
5.07
Storage Volume
36.81
37,52
38.46
31.49
33.65
34,50
37.60
39.81
36.15
36.06
35.42
38.55
0
�f3 zC �- "
c c_
0
j Z(0
•
AWM Page 6

125
Lock Tr
110
TBM - Elevation = 99.98 105
Located on loading pad at push r
off ramp on uphill side. Base of 1o0
crack in retaining wall, r-
85
70
60
Silos
ging Area
Culvert-6
6' PVC
I110
%105
100
PVC Pipe
5 �
Clean Water Pond
Actual Size of pond will be specified by irrigation
designer. Water will be piped from adjoining draw.
Estimated Bottom = 55.0
Estimated Bottom Dimension = 20' X 50'
ESW Elevation = 60.0
Unsurfaced D. A. - 15 Ft-.
h >,/
a'ter bl�erslohs
4
�7
1 75 s0
70
110
105
1o0
95
1
90
Milk Parlor and
Freestall Barn
Ito
of Surfaced D, A, - 49,895 sq ft
Waste Storage Pond
Top of Dan Elev. = 100.0
Emergency Spillway = 98.5
Max. Elev, = 97.1
Average Bottom Dimensions = 70' X 210'
Inside slopes = 211
Outside slopes = 3d
Top of Dam Width = 10'
Bottom Elevation = 89.0
Scale €' = 80'
Ladd Dairy Farm
Iredell County, North Carolina
System Plan View
Waste Management System
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
[)ale
Sam Bingham4-2002 0-"ad By
mow, SCB 1-97
Tma /S Ze7e
T+cee Sheet 1 No. wmp Re N�
ChecMe; o 1

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
Rome Carl Ladd and Sons Dairy
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following major components:
1. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPE
2. WASTE STORAGE POND
3. IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
5. FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREA
6. CONCRETE CURBING
7. VEGETATED DIVERSION
8. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
9. Filter AREA PLANTING
10. STOCK TRAILS
11. TROUGH OR TANKS
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and freestall barn and stored in the WASTE STORAGE POND.
Slurry waste will be irrigated from the SLURRY WASTE STORAGE POND at agronomic rates. The WASTE
TORAGE POND is designed to provide 120 days storage for the slurry wastes produced by 300 milk cows,
dry cows and 250 heifers.
Also, contaminated runoff will flow into the WASTE STORAGE POND. This structure is designed to provide
storage for runoff from the feedlot and wastewater from the milk barn for a 120-day period and provide
storage space for the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm runoff from the feedlot into the pond.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste Contaminates to
surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required under the
Non -discharge regulations.
Runoff from lounging areas is diverted through 100' of filter area.
Small heifer feed areas in barns and lots will also be collected and spread.
9

1. WASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store manure, feedlot runoff and waste water from the milk
barn for a 120 days period. Additional storage space is included to contain the twenty-five (25) year,
twenty-four (24) hour storm runoff from the feedlot. A post will be installed with the level of the top of post
indicating the level of storage available prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity. The
maximum storage level is 1.6 ft. below the emergency spillway elevation. The WASTE STORAGE POND
consists of an earthen dam and concrete chute for discharging contaminated water and manure into -the
structure.
OPERATION
The level of management for the entire system will determine the service life of the WASTE STORAGE
POND. Once the manure and bedding materials have reached the WASTE STORAGE POND, how
effectively the waste is agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the WASTE STORAGE
POND.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WASTE STORAGE POND. The accumulated
solids may accumulate up to 6,000 cu ft of space before the storage period is affected adversely. Poor
management will result in the rapid accumulation of solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the
WASTE STORAGE POND to the point that some form of dredging will be required. If a large volume of solid
waste is allowed to wash from the lot and/or if inadequate agitation is performed, this dredging operation
could be required in a very short period of time.
pt any point in the future the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND becomes reduced to the
int that solids must be removed, the removal of these solids will be at your expense.
MAINTENANCE
The concrete in the WASTE STORAGE POND should be inspected periodically for major cracks. Vegetation
on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a vigorous stand. The dam
should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place only when
the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any
time. See FILTER AREA PLANTING for further maintenance requirements. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the tredell Soil & Water Conservation District office.
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPE
6A=_U1WI__U"]
The milking parlor wastewater pipe consists of PVC pipe from milking parlor to waste storage pond.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the PIPING SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or
replace as needed. Inspect the drop structures seasonally and remove accumulated solids.
9

3. IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM consists of a Pump, requiring large tractor with H. P. specified,
with a suction line and underground pipe to irrigation fields, above ground hydrants and a moveable gun with
a bore nozzle See irrigation design for design data.
OPERATION
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full storage level marker in the
structure. When the liquids level in the WASTE STORAGE POND reaches the marker, liquids must be
removed by pumping from the structure, either into the irrigation system or to a spreader tank for land
application. Do not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate on frozen or
saturated soils. Irrigate only until soil is near saturation point.
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly agitate the waste in the Holding Pond. For
irrigation, the gate valve controlling agitation will be closed and the irrigation mainline valve will be opened.
The gun will already be at one of the hydrants, the other will be plugged. This gun can operate a maximum
of under ideal dry conditions, The irrigation mainline valve must be closed to change the gun location. For
filling spreaders, the agitation control valve will remain open while the filler valve is opened. The agitation
valve may be throttled down to divert more volume to filler line.
MAINTENANCE
Oil tests the irrigation fields annually. Vegetation in the irrigation fields should be inspected periodically
and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand. Fields may also need to be limed and fertilized
annually. It is essential that neither vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within the
irrigation fields. The irrigation fields should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The
irrigation fields may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take place
only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than four
(4) inches. See FILTER AREA PLANTING for further maintenance requirements.
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
Clean water collection and piping consist of piping clean water under stock trails and diverting clean water
around lounging and feedlot areas.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the components of the CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM annually for cracks
or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed. Inspect annually and remove accumulated
sediment.
0

5. FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREAS
OVERVIEW
The FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREAS serve a tow fold purpose, they filter sediment from exposed
feeding and lounging areas. They are located below the milk cow lounging lot and also below the silo and
diversion outlet. These areas can be control grazed or mowed of hay to prevent unwanted growth. These
buffers are used in lieu of storage structures. Proper maintenance of these buffers must be followed or a
storage structure will be required.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within the buffer. If grazing does
take place, caution should be practiced to prevent overgrazing. Grass should be a minimum of six inches.
These buffers should have at least 80% ground cover. Planned width must be maintained.
6. CONCRETE CURBING
OVERVIEW
The CONCRETE CURBING constructed on the lot will prevent contaminated liquids from entering the
stream in any storm less severe than the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm.
MAINTENANCE
Oe concrete should be inspected periodically for major cracks.
T. VEGETATED DIVERSION
OVERVIEW
A VEGETATED DIVERSION will be located above the WASTE STORAGE POND and will convey
non -contaminated runoff around the structure. Diversions will also be located around the feedlot to divert
clean water.
MAINTENANCE
The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a
vigorous stand. It is essential that neither vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within the
diversion. The diversion should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The diversion may
be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take place only when the soils
are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches. If
sedimentation has reduced the capacity of the channel, contact the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation
District for technical assistance in correcting this problem. See FILTER AREA PLANTING for further
maintenance requirements.

8. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed at locations as indicated on plan maps. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
will be installed according to NRCS standard 382 (Fencing).
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or rot. If fencing wire becomes
loose, re -tighten to original specifications. If fence posts are rotted or damaged in any way, replace damaged
posts with a post, which meets the original specifications
9. FILTER AREA PLANTING
OVERVIEW
FILTER AREA PLANTING applies to seeding 100` of grass below the lounging areas and seeding diversions.
At least 25' of grass area should be maintained between ditches and stock trails.
MAINTENANCE
Soil samples should be taken at least once per year. Fertilizer and lime should be applied at the rates
recommended as a result of the soil test. Fertilizer and lime should be applied either during
September -October or February -March. Vegetation should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed
insure a vigorous stand. The filter area may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing
qWerations must take place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a
height of less than four (4) inches. All FILTER AREA PLANTING should be mowed at least annually to
prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place only when the soil is dry and vegetation should
not be mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time, Do not mow cool season grasses during
periods when plants are showing signs of drought stress.
10. STOCK TRAILS
OVERVIEW
Stock trails will be located as indicated on plan maps.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the stock trails periodically for damage and wear. If gravel layer becomes thin, gravel shall be
replaced to maintain a minimum of 4" of cover over the filter cloth. Manure accumulations in broad based dips
on stock trail shall be removed at regular intervals to prevent overtopping.
12. TROUGH OR TANK
OVERVIEW
water tanks are placed around the farm to provide a healthy source of cattle water at locations that cattle
spend their time and to replace streams as the major drinking source.

MAINTENANCE
0
inspect the TROUGH OR TANK area periodically for any soft or damaged areas in the cloth and gravel. If
the gravel gets thin, more should be applied to the recommended depth. The designed depth should be
maintained over the entire area for it to remain structurally sound. Inspect the tank itself along with the base
for damage and repair or replace if necessary.
GENERAL COMMENTS
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation, especially that
of the filter area, diversion and dam, is not adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a
manner not permitted by its labeling. To protect yourself, never apply any pesticide in a manner or for a
purpose other than as instructed on the label or in labeling accompanying the pesticide product that you
purchase. Do not ignore the instructions for use of protective clothing and devices and for storage and
disposal of pesticide wastes, including containers.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water conservation District if repairs or major modifications are required for any of
the components of this Waste Management System.
0
0
r_