230008_PERMIT FILE_20171231

NCDENR
Norti Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Pesour c.as
Beverly E-aves Perdue
Governor
Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate
Bridges/Cook Dairy
3515 Ken McEntire Rd
Lawndale, NC 28090
Dear Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate:
ivi inn nr Wgfit;r 0ii litlr
Goleen H. Sullins
Director LU
October 15, 2009 1
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC230008
Bridges/Cook Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cleveland County
In accordance with your requests for renewal and change of ownership, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Bridges/Cook Dairy, located in Cleveland County, with a swine animal capacity
of no greater than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: 30 Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: 15 Beef Stocker Calf: Other:
Milk Cow: 130 Beef Feeder:
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC230008 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 flail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location; 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh. North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] ! FAX.: 91S 715-0588 0ustomei Service: 1,-877-623-6748
Internet wvmncwateraualitv.or,
_ �a; 1Do.,rtm,itp-..,ffirrualm", knon _ ,:-nilove,
One
Nolrth]r—a-.o ina
4 147,A nt V

i
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does'not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws.i rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this pe t con ve a v property rights in either real or personal property.
+._ S
Per 15A;NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National. Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/er/p
facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
AAA:,
fur Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Cleveland County Health Department
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC230008)
AFO Notebooks

Nutrient Management Plan for Animal Waste Utilization
Bridges and Cook Dairy — Facility Number 23-8
Cleveland County
2008 RECEIVED I DENR f DWQ
September
Revision 20 AQUIErP'PPnTFr.T1ON SECTION
MAR 19 2009
This plan updates the prior waste utilization plan. The Phosphorous Loss
Assessment Tool ( PLAT) was utilized. It showed the P loss Index rating to
be low or medium for these fields and operation. Therefore application rates
will continue to be based on the nitrogen needs of the crops. Nitrogen needs for
listed crops were based on current accepted realistic yield expectations (RYE) for
the soil type of the planned fields.
Background data from approved plan.
Waste management plan is for 130 milk cows including 56 Holsteins, 55
Guernsey and 1.0 Jersey. Because of the smaller size of Guernsey and
Jersey, this is the equivalent to 115 Holsteins weight. An additional 15
heifers also are included on the lot. These cows spend approximately 50%
of the time on the lot (50% confinement and 50% in pasture). The plan
also includes manure for 30 calves (day old — 400 lb. with 75% collection)
which can be spread with a solid spreader or pushed into the waste
storage ponds for irrigation.
Capacity of Waste Storage Ponds for 180 Days.
Slurry - 535,409 gallons
Flush - 146,571 gallons
Total - 681,980 gallons (91,174 cu ft)
Methods of Application.
• Irrigation of waste storage ponds by traveling gun on 48.66 effective
acres (fields la, 2a, 3a).
• Solids from calf hutches may be incorporated into waste storage
ponds or spread with solids spreader.
• Broadcast of slurry waste using hauling tank.
Estimated Plant Available Nutrients (lbs.) Produced. PAN PAP2O5 PAK20
Milk cows and heifers (130) 4,442 4,822 7,290
Calves (30) 219 221 ' 311
Total 4,661 5,043 7,601

A
Cropping System and Realistic Yields.
The planned cropping system for crop fields is a one year system of small
grain for silage (or hay) followed by double cropped corn silage. For
erosion control the small grain is planned to be no -tilled at a minimum
every other year while the corn is planned to be no -tilled every year. At
time of no -till planting there should be a minimum residue cover of 30%.
Pasture should be properly grazed and maintained for optimum production.
Realistic yields based on soil type and slope. See plan for realistic yield by
field.
Waste Application.
Based on a phosphorous loss index of "low" or "medium" animal waste
may be applied based on the nitrogen needs of the crop. This will result in
the over -application of phosphorous and future assessments could show a
P index of "high" or "very high".
The nitrogen needs of the crops are based on realistic yield estimates and
soil type. Animal waste should be tested for nutrient content and applied at
a rate not to exceed these nitrogen amounts. Waste should not be applied
more than 30 days prior to planting. if commercial fertilizer is used to
supplement the application of animal waste the total of the two should not
exceed the nitrogen needs.
Please refer to your attached Nutrient Management Plan for Animal Waste
Utilization for additional details and specifications.

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Kevin Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd
Lawndale, NC 28090-9672
[phone]
09-09-2008
This plan has been developed by:
P. Benjamin Robinson, Jr.
NRCS
844 Wallace Grove Drive
Shelby, NC 28150-9213
[phone] Ex 3
�Z=
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. Y have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (vvAbar) fr Date
J—
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
.....------•----------------------•-............----.............--..------........................................ ........ -------
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 09-09-2008 Cover Page 1
/I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U1
130 Milk cows, 50% confinement waste generated 1,379,950 gals/year by a 130 animal
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
4884
Incorporated
6661
Injected
7549
Irrigated
4440
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) +
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
4,884
43427
-38,543
9,314,016
-7,934,066
S44
Dairy (Calf) Solid waste generated 123.00 tons/year by a 30 animal Dairy (Calf) Solid
operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
529
Incorporated
701
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year I
529
5664
-5,135
1,317,19
-1,194.19
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
- ------ --- - ---- -------- .....----- ..........-- "ef_ --- -s---...--------------------------.....------------- .-........--------
.
Note: In source [D, S means standard source, iJ means user defined source,
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 09-09-2008 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
beaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
585
1
9.20
8.90
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
Coro, Silage
21.2 Tons
585
3
20.60
20.30
NIA -
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
585
4
6.30
4.70
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10) Tons
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
965
la,2a,3a
48,70
48.70
NIA
Appling
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
Coro, Silage
21.9 Tons
965
1 b,2b,3b
17.90
16.00
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10 A Tons
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
965
4
8.50
7.60
NIA
Appling
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Torts
965
5
10.50
10.20
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
Coro, Silage
21.9 Tons
965
6
8.701
8.00
NIA
Appling
Fescue Pasuue
5.1 Tons
965
7
13.00
11.90
N/A
Appling
Fescue Pasture
5.2 Tons
965
8
16.50
16.30
NIA
Appling
Small Grain, Silage
10.6 Tons
Coro, Silage
23.0 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 159.90 152.60
';g^���')y!T�ry�r6'rrl�f}�,
r�).
t�5+"� b���ir!s'i �.Ti. ip�
�SZ
'-�.•P4T.L�FQ^.,".:=�LL%i4mea
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
c 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
922858 Database Version 3.1 Data Printed 9/9/2008
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCS Page Page 1 of I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use -
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
!D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APplic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
FeM
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
g&VA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
585
1
UI
Cecil
9.20
8.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/3 t
112
0
D
Broad.
112
31.64
0.00
281.61
0.00
585
I
Ul
Cecil
9.20
8.90
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2115-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
65.26
0.00
580.83
0.00
585
3
UL
Cecil
. 20.60
20,301
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
32,49
0.0
659.54
0.00
585
3
Ul
Cecil
20.60
20.30
Cam, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
67.52
0,00
1,370.69
0.00
585
4
Ul
Cecil
6,30
4.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
11
31,64
0.00
148.72
0.00
585
4
Ul
Cecil
6.30
4.70
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
65.26
0.001
306.73
0.00
965
la,2a,3a
U1
lAppling
48.70
48.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
I15
0
0
Irrig.
115
12.78
0,00
622.33
0.00
965
la,2a,3a
UI
Appling
48.70
48.70
Corn, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6/30
239
0
D
Irrig.
239
26.56
0,00
1,293.36
0.00
965
1b,2b,3b
S44
Cecil
17.90
16.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad. 1
115
0-001
26.74
0.001
427.9t,
965
Ib,20b
Ul
Cecil
17.90
16.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
965
lb,2b,3b
S44 ICecil
17.90
16.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6130
239
0
0
Broad.
239
0.00
55.58
0.00
889.29
965
4
U1
Appling
8.50
7.60
Fescue Pawn
5.1 Tons
8/1-7131
170
0
0
Broad.
170
48.03
0.00
365.01
0.00
965
5
Ul
Cecil
10.50
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
32.49
0.001
331.39
0.00
965
5
UI
Cecil
10.50
I0.20
Cam, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6130
239
0
0
Broad.
239
67.52
0.00
688.72
0.00
965
6 1
Ul
Appling 1
8.70
8.00
Fescue Pasture ISATonsl
8/1-7131
170
0
0
Broad.
170
48.03
0.00
384.22
0.00
965
7 1
UI
piing
13.00
11.90
Fescue Pasture
5.2 Tons
8/1-713I
173
F0
0
Broad.
173
48.88
0.00
581.62
0.00
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 9/9/2008 WUT Page Page 1 of 2

Waste Utilization 'Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic_
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
OWA)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
pbslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaYA
Tons
I000 gals
tons
965
8
U1
Appling
16.50
16.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.6 Ton
9/1-3/31
118
0
0
Broad.
118
33.34
0.00
543.39
0.00
965
8
Ul
Appling
16.50
16.30
Corn, Silage
23.0 Ton
2/15-6130
251
0
0
Broad.
251
::70,9 ..1
0.00
1,155.86
0.00
Total Applied, IODO gallons
9314.0
Total Produced, IODD gallons
1,379.95
P_. A
Balance, 1000 gallons
-7,934.07'
Total Applied tons
1,317.1y
Total Produced, tons
123.00
Balance, tons
PIP
-1,194.19
Notes. 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 9/9/2008 WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
96S
Ia,2a,3a
Appling
0.45
1.0
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 9/9/2008 IAF Page Page 1 of I
NOTE; Symbol * means user entered data

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name 130 Milk cows, 50% confinement
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Availabie Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
I
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
149
l
6
119
1
7
88
I
8
57
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
I
150
1
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
.-----------•------............................... -------------------------------------------- - ................. .----.....---•--------
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 09-09-2008 Capacity Page Page I of I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
----------------------- ----...................................................... .---------------------------------- ........ ....... .-.
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 9/9/2008 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by. over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shalt not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 9/9/2008 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a ".closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
1.9. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within SO days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintainer) for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
................... ..----­--------------................................................................ --...... ------------- ------ -------------------
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 9/9/2008 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4, 6, 7
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1a,2a,3a, Ib,2b,3b, 3, 4, 5, 8
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 Ibs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of tite corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
----------------------------------------------------••-----.......--•--------------------._--..----------•--- .-----• - ........
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 09-09-2008 CropNote Page Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1 a,2a,3a, I b,2b,3b, 3, 4, 5, 8
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. in the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till, Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
----- ••-------------------------------------------------•----...-------------------•------------------------•-----•----------------
922858 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 09-09-2008 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

Bridges & Cook Dairy
Date: 9/3/2008
Customer(s): BRIDGES & COOK DAIRY
District: CLEVELAND SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1 "=660'
Field Office: SHELBY SERVICE CENTER
Agency: USDA, NRCS
Assisted By: Robinson Jr, P Benjamin
State and County: NC, CLEVELAND
340 0 340 680 1,020 1,360
Feet
A

Bridges & Cook Dairy Date: 9/912008
Customer(s): BRIDGES & COOK DAIRY Field Office: SHELBY SERVICE CENTER
Agency: USDA, NRCS
District: CLEVELAND SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Assisted By: Robinson Jr, P Benjamin
State and County: NC, CLEVELAND
N
o 340 0 340 680 1,020 1,360
Feet

Soil Map—CEeveland County, North Carolina
N �
A 0 t00 200 400 W0
Feet
0 500 I AO 2,000 3,000
" WkWM Reaaroas Web Sall Survey 2.0 9woos
40 cumwvawn Service National Cooperative Sail Survey Page i of 3

Map Unit Description (Brief) -Cleveland County, North Carolina
Map Unit Description (Brief)
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the selected area. The map unit descriptions in this
report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and
properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area
dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit
is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant
soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties
of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they
have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
The "Map Unit Description (Brief)" report gives a brief, general description of the
major soils that occur in a map unit. Descriptions of nonsoil (miscellaneous areas)
and minor map unit components may or may not be included. This description is
written by the local soil scientists responsible for the respective soil survey area
data. A more detailed description can be generated by the "Map Unit Description"
report.
Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in
other Soil Data Mart reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations,
capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the
Soil Data Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit
descriptions.
Report —Map Unit Description (Brief)
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Description Category: SO1
Map Unit: ApB Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
This map unit consists of gently sloping Appling soils on uplands. Appling soils are
very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Map Unit: ApC—Appling sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes
This map unit consists of gently sloping and strongly sloping Appling soils on
uplands. Appling soils are very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface
layer and a clayey subsoil.
Map Unit: CaB2--Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
tJ_..SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 9/2/2008
i Conservation Service National Cooperative Sail Survey Page 1 of 2

Map Unit Description (Brief) —Cleveland County, North Carolina
This map unit consists of gently sloping Cecil soils on uplands. Cecil soils are very
deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Map Unit: ChA--Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally Flooded
This map unit consists of nearly level Chewacia soils on flood plains. Chewacla
soils are very deep and somewhat poorly drained. They have a loamy surface layer
and subsoil. Seasonal high water table is within a depth of 0.5 to 1.5 feet. These
soils are subject to occasional flooding.
Map Unit: HeB—Helena-Worsham complex 1 to B percent slopes
This map unit consists of nearly level to gently sloping Helena soils and nearly level
Worsham soils on toe slopes and head of drainageways. Helena soils are very deep
and moderately well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Seasonal high water table is within a depth of 1.5 to 2.5 feet. Worsham soils are
very deep and poorly drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey
subsoil. Seasonal high water table is within a depth of 1.0 foot.
Map Unit: PaC2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
This map unit consists of strongly sloping Pacolet soils on uplands. Pacolet soils
are very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey
Subsoil.
Map Unit: PbB2—Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
This map unit consists of gently sloping Pacolet and Bethlehem soils on uplands.
Pacolet soils are very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and
a clayey subsoil. Bethlehem soils are well drained and have soft (rippabie) bedrock
within a depth of 20 to 40 inches. They have a gravelly, loamy surface layer and a
clayey subsoil.
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Cleveland County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Jun 22, 2007
lJ Natural Rasaurcas Web Soil Survey 2.0
Conservation Sarvlca National Cooperative Soll Survey 912/2008
Page 2 of 2

Soil Map -Cleveland County, Noah Camlins
IN Metgrs
a Sao zoa aao saa
Fast
a 450 900 I'm 2.700
L.SUA t>&WBJ Resomes Wets Soil Survey 2.0 =ld; ? 0.
CorraemOon Semioe National Cooperative Boll Survey = .fie t

Map Unit Description (Brief} —Cleveland County, North Carolina
Map Unit Description (Brief)
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the selected area. The map unit descriptions in this
report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and
properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area
dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit
is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant
soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties
of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they
have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
The "Map Unit Description (Brief)" report gives a brief, general description of the
major soils that occur in a map unit, Descriptions of nonsoil (miscellaneous areas)
and minor map unit components may or may not be included. This description is
written by the local soil scientists responsible for the respective soil survey area
data. A more detailed description can be generated by the "Map Unit Description"
report.
Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in
other Soil Data Mart reports, which give properties of the soils and the limitations,
capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the
Soil Data Mart reports define some of the properties included in the map unit
descriptions.
Report —Map Unit Description (Brief)
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Description Category: SOI
Map Unit: ApC Appling sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes
This map unit consists of gently sloping and strongly sloping Appling soils on
uplands. Appling soils are very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface
layer and a clayey subsoil.
Map Unit: CaB2--Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
This map unit consists of gently sloping Cecil soils on uplands. Cecil soils are very
deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Map Unit: PaC2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 9/212008
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2

It
Map Unit Description {BrieO--Cleveland County, North Carolina
This map unit consists of strongly sloping Pacolet soils on uplands. Pacolet soils
are very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey
subsoil.
Map Unit: PaD2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
This map unit consists of moderately steep Pacolet soils on uplands. Pacolet soils
are very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey
subsoil.
Map Unit: PsC2—Pacolet-Saw complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
This map unit consists of strongly sloping Pacolet and Saw soils on uplands.
Pacolet soils are very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface layer and
a clayey subsoil. Saw soils are well drained and have hard bedrock within a depth
of 20 to 40 inches. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Map Unit: ToA—Toccoa loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
This map unit consists of nearly level Toccoa soils on flood plains. Toccoa soils are
very deep and well drained or moderately well drained. They have a loamy surface
layer and loamy subsoil. Seasonal high water table is within a depth of 2.5 to 5.0
feet. These soils are subject to occasional flooding.
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Cleveland County, North Carolina
Survey'Area Data: Version 13, Jun 22, 2007
U211111111111111 SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 9I2/2008
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2

Bridges and Cook Dairy
Waste Storage Pond
Slurry Pond"
Elevations
Feet Below
Top Marker
Interval
Depth
Gallons
Removed per
Interval
Depth of
Remaining
Li id Waste
Gallons
Remaining
In Pond
Top Marker 193.4
0
0
0
8.4
535,409
192.4
1.0'
1.0'
85,010
7.4
450,399
191.4
2.0'
1.0'
78,749
6.4
371,650
190.4
3.0'
1.0'
72,731
5.4
298,919
189.4
4.0'
1.0'
66,951
4.4
231,968
188.4
5.0'
1.0
61,408
3.4
170,560
187.4
6.0'
1.0'
56,106
2.4
114,454
186.4
7.0'
1.0'
51,043
1.4
63,411
Bottom Pond 185.0
8.41
1.4'
63,411
0
0
Total 535,409

Elevations
Bottom 12" 193.5
PVC Pipe
192.5
191.5
190.5
189.5
188.5
187.5
186.5
Bot torn Pond 185.0
Bridges and Cook Dairy
Waste Storage Pond
"Flush Pond"
Feet From
Bottom _Pipe
0
1.0'
2.0'
3.0'
4.0'
5.0'
6.07
7.0'
8.5'
Gallons
Interval
Removed per
Depth
Interval
0
0
1.0'
28,762
1.0'
25,171
1.0'
21,822
1.0'
18,710
1.0'
15,838
1.0'
13,205
1.0'
10,811
1.5'
12,252
Total 146,571
Depth of
Remaining
Gallons
Liquid Waste
Remaining
8.5
146,571
7.5
117,809
6.5
92,638
5.5
70,816
4.5
52,106
3.5
36,268
2.5
23,063
1.5
12,252
0
0

NCANAT Version: 1.99
PLAT Results For: Cleveland 9/3/2008
9:25:35 AM
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop.
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 6
SOLUBLE P = 3
LEACHATE P 0
SOURCE P - 4
TOTAL P RATING = 13 (LOW)
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook
965
la,2a,3a
APB: Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Buffer Width Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1.34 ac in
Lb P205: 99.3 lb
Application. Method: All other surface
4.0 t/ac/yr
10-19 ft
165
1.13
GOOD
OUTPUTS

TAT Version: 1.99
LT Results For: Cleveland
9/3/2008 10:04:31 AM
'alendar Year:
'ounty:
roducer Identifier
Tact Number:
ield Number:
oil Series:
oderately eroded
rop.
Mpg:
ertilizers:
pplications
oil Loss:
eceiving Slope Distance
ail Test 0" - 411
WV Factor (USER)
l ydroogic Condition:
ARTICULATE P _
9
OLUBLE P =
4
EACHATE P
0
DURCE P _
29
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook
965
lb,2b,3b
CaB2: Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage -- high residue
Buffer Width Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 45 1000 gal
Lb P205: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
4 t/ac/yr
100-149 ft
188
1.14
GOOD
OUTPUTS
A-L Y RATING = 42 (MEDIUM)

CANAT Version: 1.99
PLAT Results For: Cleveland
9/3/2008 9:45:5B AM
alendar Year:
ounty:
roducer Identifier:
Tact Number:
field Number.
oil Series:
MPs.
ertilizers:
pplications
oil Loss:
eceiving Slope Distance
oil Test O" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
ydrologic Condition:
ARTICULATE P _ 1
OLUBLE P = 3
EACHATE P = 0
P = 18
P RATING = 22 (LOW)
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook
965
4
APB: Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Fescue (Pasture) :
Buffer Width, Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 30 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
0.6 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
157
1.04
FAIR
OUTPUTS

C.TAT Version: 1.99
PLAT Results For: Cleveland
9/3/2008 9:59:19 AM
'alendar Year:
ounty:
roducer Identifier:
ract Number:
ield Number:
oil Series:
oderately eroded
rop:
MPS:
ertilizers:
.pplications
oil Loss:
.eceiving Slope Distance
oil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (USER)
ydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P -
19
OLUBLE P =
3
EACHATE P T
0
OURCE P =
26
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook
965
5
CaB2: Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Buffer Width Width = 15 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 40 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
4 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
124
1.11
GOOD
OUTPUTS
AL P RATING = 48 (MEDIUM)

NCWT Version: 1.99
J
PLAT Results For: Cleveland 9/3/2008
Calendar Year:
County:
Producer Identifier:
Tract Number:
Field Number:
Soil Series:
Crop:
BMPs:
Fertilizers:
applications
Soil Loss:
Receiving Slope Distance
Soil. Test 0" - 411
WV_Factor (USER)
Hydrologic Condition:
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P _ 2
LEACHATE P _ 0
SOURCE P - 18
TOTAL P RATING = 21 (LOW
INPUTS
10:32:31 AM
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook Dairy
965
6
ApB: Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Fescue (Pasture)
Buffer Width Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 30 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
0.7 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
71
_96
FAIR
OUTPUTS

7ATANAT
_..................... . _ - �.............
Version: 1.99 Results For: Cleveland 9/3/2008 10:33:21 AM
alendar Year:
ounty:
rodueer Identifier:
ract Number:
field Number:
oil Series:
rap.
MPs:
ertilizers:
pplications
oil Loss:
eceiving Slope Distance
oil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
ydrologic Condition:
ARTICULATE P _
1
OLUBLE P =
2
EACHATE P =
0
OURCE P µ
18
P RATING = 21 (LOW)
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook Dairy
965
7
ApB: Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Fescue (Pasture) :
Buffer Width Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 30 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
0.7 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
71
.96
FAIR
OUTPUTS

CATAT Version: 1.99
PLAT Results For: Cleveland
alendar Year:
ounty:
roducer Identifier:
ract Number;
ield Number:
oil Series:
rop:
MPs :
ertilizers:
pplications
oil Loss:
eceiving Slope Distance
oil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
ydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P _
5
OLUBLE P -
1
,EACRATE P =
0
OURCE P =
21
9/3/2008 10:35:21 AM
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook Dairy
965
8
ApB: Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Buffer Width Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 45 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
6.0 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
71
1.18
GOOD
OUTPUTS
AL, P DATING = 27 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1.99
PLAT Results For: Cleveland 9/9/2008 3:36:24 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year:
2Q0$
County:
Cleveland
Producer Identifier:
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Tract Number:
505
Field Number:
1
Soil Series:
CaB2: Cecil sandy clay loam,
2 to 8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage - high residue
BMPs:
Buffer Width Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
40 1000 gal
Lb P205:
5.8 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Soil Loss:
4.3 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 411
132
WV Factor (USER)
1.1
Hydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 18
SOLUBLE P - 3
LEACHATE P _ 0
SOURCE P =
TOTAL P RATING
l
KT1
47 (MEDIUM

CANAT Version:�-
i
PLAT Results For: Cleveland 9/9/2008 3:40:33 PM
alendar Year:
ounty:
roducer Identifier:
Tact Number:
field Number:
oil Series:
oderately eroded
rop:
MPs:
ertilizers:
pplications
oil Loss:
eceiving Slope Distance
oil Test 0" - 41,
WV Factor (USER)
ydrologic Condition:
ARTICULATE P =
12
OLUBLE P
4
EACHATE P =
0
OURCE P =
26
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook Dairy
585
3
CaB2: Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Buffer Width Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 40 1000 gal
Lb P205: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3.8 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
150
1.00
GOOD
OUTPUTS
P RATING = 42 (MEDIUM)

CANAT Version: 1.99
PLAT Results For: Cleveland 9/9/2008 3:38:31 PM
'alendar Year:
ounty:
roducer Identifier:
ract Number:
ield Number:
oil Series:
oderately eroded
rop :
KPs :
ertilizers:
pplications
oil Loss:
eceiving Slope Distance
oil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
ydrologic Condition:
ICULATE P = 20
P =
4
E P =
0
P =
26
INPUTS
2008
Cleveland
Bridges & Cook Dairy
585
4
CaB2: Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Buffer Width Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 40 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 5.8 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3.8 t/ac/yr
20-29 ft
157
1.04
GOOD
OUTPUTS
P RATING = 50 (MEDIUM

aeility Number
49 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit frCompliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason far Visit Ot Routine o Complaint Q roiiow up 0 Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Hate of Visit: WtIS Arrival Time: Departure Time:It' 21,d&�7K, Count: i
Farm Name:Owner Email: — - - — - —-------- ------ _
Owner Name: -__----------_---- Phone:
Mailing Address: — _.. _-_--- _ _______ __—.-----
Physical Address:_ -----
Facility Contact:
Title: _...—.._.
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ----_-_-- — _-- ,-- --,--.---------_____—
Back-up Operator: -----_--_.— Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = 0 Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ t = «
Phone No:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Integrator: --
Operator Certification Number: .. _. _..
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑Non -Layer I I El
Discharges & Strearn Imnacts
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dait Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
J
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NI?
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
�
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
other than from a discharge'?
12128104
Continu
d

[Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
El Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DW
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`?
ElYes
ElNo
ElNA ❑ E
$. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ma intena itce/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
❑ Excessive Pondiag ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Dritl ❑ Application Outside of Area
1.2. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
4 6mrnents (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and or any recomimendafipas or atny otltet ��ounrrlents � � �`'',vt, a��ls ro
Use drawings of iacility to better e�piain situations: (use additional pades as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued
f
f",

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes. check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropiiate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certific
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Cod
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
23..If selected, did the .facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certi Pied operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
d.iiionstl Comments and/or Drawings:
0A
_9
iCCle�, �c�ar4 MA ✓\�'�.>
NE
NE
NE
Ltion
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
12128104

A97
NCDEE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Colleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director I:f ' cr taf3/1
September 10, 2010
u ti I UP 14 2010
Reba Head for the Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate
Bridges & Cook Dairy
3515 Ken McEntire Road = ""{
.�....•.;L..
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject; Rescission of Animal Waste Permit
Certificate of Coverage No. AWI230008
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Cleveland County
Dear Reba Head:
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit Certificate of
Coverage with the submission of a completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure
Report Form on September 8, 2010. Staff from the Mooresville Regional Office has confirmed
that this Coverage is no longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate
of Coverage No. AW1230008 is rescinded, effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you must first
apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal
waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will
subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 if it would he helpful to discuss
this matter further.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins
cc: James Bealle, Aquifer Protection Section, Mooresville Regional Office
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Cleveland County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
Permit File AWI230008
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715.60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet w_%v.nmatqrauaIitv.gffl
ont
NhCarolina
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Bealle, James
From: Joshi, J.R.
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:57 AM
To: Bealle, James
Cc: Christine Blanton Lawson
Subject: AW1230008
Attachments: AW1230008P100726.docx; image001.jpg
The individual permit we sent for Bridges/Cook Dairy had wrong address on it. I have since corrected the
address and re -sent them a copy. The corrected copy l attached for your records.
I. X Joshi
NC-DENR Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
New email address: laya.ioshi a�ncdenr,rrav
DISCLAIMER: All a -mails sent to and from this account are subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

to
Y' MA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
July 26, 2010
Reba Head for the Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate
Bridges/Cook Dairy
3515 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Permit No. AW1230008
Bridges/Cook Dairy
Animal Waste Management System
Cleveland County
Dear Reba Head:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with your June 30, 2010 request for a zero animal permit, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Permit issued to Reba Head for the Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system. You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to
zero until such time as the waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished
to maintain it as an active cattle farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Bridges/Cook Dairy, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
annual average of zero (0) cattle.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 2015 and replaces the COC No.
AWC230008 issued to this facility on October 15, 2009. You are subject to the conditions of this permit
until the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a letter to
the Division of Water Quality to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure
of all containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a I00-ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1636 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
i_ocation: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone]FAX: [phone]Customer Service:l-877-623.6748 Nort Carolina
Internet: www.nmaterquality.org /y}�/}+/y/I
An Equal Opportunity l Afflrmalive Action Employer ;Vatuxally

V
If you wish to continue the activity pennitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. if you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Cleveland County Health Department
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
APS Central Files (Permit No. AW1230008)
AFO Notebooks

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL CATTLE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Reba Head for the Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate
Cleveland County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Bridges/Cook
Dairy, located in Cleveland County, consisting of zero (0) cattle and the application to land as specified in
the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated tinder this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25-year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established.
for receiving waters as per Title I SA, Subchapter 213, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
3. The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.

4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 1.43-215.1013(1) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.
5. Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case -by -case basis by the Division.
II. OPERATION A_ND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
l . The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times,
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the Optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
5. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc, shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.

Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.
10, A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13, The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and. handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14, No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
18. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.

III, MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.
Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days -(before or after) of the date of application.
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc Phosphorus Copper
4, The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record
the off -site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition 111. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition 11I.3.

6. A copy of this Permit, the Facility's permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.
7. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional. Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required. in Condition V. 2. of this Permit.
c. Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
d. Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
e. Any fail ore of the animal waste management system that renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
f. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.

The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.
IV, INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
I. The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required tinder this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoonslstorage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25-year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one ( I ) foot of structural freeboard.
3. Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.

Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (1.5) days of completion of closure.
4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit.
This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
7. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111(c). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
Vl. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
3. It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 26th day of July, 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
for Coleen .H. Sullins, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AW1230008

-gwA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment
Division of Water Quali
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Coleen H. Sullins
Director IN JUL 2 6 2010
July 26, 2010
Reba Head for the Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate t D V4f�<O
Bridges/Cook Dairy taltor roteci
334 Lundy Rd
Statesville, NC 286258334
Subject: Permit No. AWI230008
Bridges/Cook Dairy
Animal Waste Management System
Cleveland County
Dear Reba Head:
In accordance with your June 30, 2010 request for a zero animal permit, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Permit issued to Reba Head for the Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system. You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to
zero until such time as the waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished
to maintain it as an active cattle farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Bridges/Cook Dairy, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
annual average of zero (0) cattle.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 2015 and replaces the COC No.
AWC230008 issued to this facility on October 15, 2009. You are subject to the conditions of this permit
until the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a letter to
the Division of Water Quality to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure
of all containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a 100-ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One 1
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NofthCarollna
Internet: wauw.ncwaterquality.org � �j�f f�� //a ,
An Equal opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer � �/ K 1`/✓,�

'w
If yourwish.to-continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
appli is fotE renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This Kermit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the D'v pn priax'to A name change or change in ownership.
f F,
This acility is located in a county -covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aqui er Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Cleveland County Health Department
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWI230008)
AFO Notebooks

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL CATTLE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Reba Head for the Heirs of Jerry Cook Estate
Cleveland County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Bridges/Cook
Dairy, located in Cleveland County, consisting of zero (0) cattle and the application to land as specified in
the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP),
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25-year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 213, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.

4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.1013(1) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.
5. Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case -by -case basis by the Division.
H. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
?. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
5. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and. soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.

9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.
10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
1 l . At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third parry applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
is. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design acid installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.

III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.
2. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application.
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc Phosphorus Copper
4. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record
the off -site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition 1I1. 3.

6. A copy of this Permit, the Facility's permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.
7. Within fifteen (1 5) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
b. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V, 2. of this Permit.
C. Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
d. Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
e. Any failure of the animal waste management system that renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.

k
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.
IV, INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
1. The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c, inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25-year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (I) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (e) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.

EN
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.
4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit.
This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a. desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111(c). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
1. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 26th clay of July, 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
,for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AW1230008

Two Waste Storage Ponds
Closure Plan
Name: Jerry Cook Estate
(Bridges & Cook Dairy)
c/o Reba Head
3515 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Phone: [phone]
Facility No. 23-8
Date Prepared: June 2010
Location: On SR 1363, Ken McEntire Rd.
Tract:
965
County:
Cleveland
Lat.h
350 24' 14"
Long.
810 38' 03"
Hu. No.:
03050105080030
Regional Division of Water Quality Phone: [phone]
Plan prepared by: Ben Robinson, District Conservationist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
[phone] Ext. 3
-p
it
o
�
G�
NOTE: NRCS or SWCD personnel must be on site while the waste ponds are being
closed for them to certify the closure of the ponds. Per NC regulations there
must also be a certified Operator In Charge (OIC) for this facility in order
to supervise and document the application of the animal waste. An OIC
must be a person who has been certified as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator for Type B (cattle).
GENERAL
Two waste storage ponds were constructed in February of 1999 for a dairy operation of
130 milk cows and 15 heifers spending 50% of the time on the lot plus 30 calves. The
farmer, Kevin Bridges, currently is using the facility. The waste storage ponds were
constructed above the high water table of the soil. For waste removal, the Liquid and
SIurry shall be agitated and pumped to the extent pumping will allow and applied to the
field through hauling tanks or irrigation. The remaining sludge will be removed and the
bottom and sides scraped using equipment such as an excavator with the sludge being
spread with a solids spreader.
VOLUME TO BE REMOVED
The two waste storage ponds are typically referred to as the slurry and the flush pond and
are connected by a 12" PVC pipe. The slurry pond is the larger of the two. Runoff from
the lot enters the flush pond directly. The slurry pond is 119 feet by 119 feet at the inside
top and 75 feet by 75 feet at the bottom. Total depth is 11 feet with the depth of animal
waste at the full marker being 8.4 feet. The capacity at 8.4 feet deep (full marker) is
535,409 gallons or 71,579 cubic feet.
The flush pond is 74 feet by 74 feet at the inside top and 30 feet by 30 feet at the bottom.
Total depth is 11 feet with the maximum liquid level at the bottom of 12" PVC going to
slurry pond being 8.5 feet deep. The capacity at 8.5 feet deep, pipe elevation, is 146,571
gallons or 19,595 cubic feet.
Total animal waste capacity for both ponds at full marker is 681,980 gallons or 91,174
cubic feet. It is estimated that the bottom two. feet of animal waste is "in -the form -of
sludge that cannot be removed by agitation and pumping.

! 2
NUTRIENT CONTENT OF WASTE
It is anticipated that the waste storage ponds will be closed in 20I0. Due to the fact the
facility is still in use, the amount of nutrients that will need to be applied will be
estimated based on full ponds (six months of storage) and estimated nutrients (from the
waste management plan) generated in six months. The method of application will be
based on broadcasting the animal waste without soil incorporation.
Actual nutrient content will need to be determined prior to closure by sampling the
slurry waste (after agitation) and the sludge within 60 days of waste application and
calculating the actual volume in the ponds.
Based on the current 85 milk cows at 50% confinement, it is estimated
the nutrient content for six months of storage are as follows:
Plant Available Nitrogen (lbs) PAN 1,657
PIant Available Phosphorous (lbs) PAP205 I,635
Plant Available Potassium (lbs) PAK20 2,472
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE
Animal waste shall be sampled within 60 days or less of application. The slurry
waste (after agitation) should be sampled as well as a separate sample for the sludge.
See attached information on waste sampling. Animal waste shall only be applied to
fields in the waste utilization plan. The waste utilization plan approved in September
2008 showed a Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool rating of Low or Medium for fields
in the plan. Therefore animal waste may be applied according to the Nitrogen needs of
the crop. No animal waste shall be applied in the buffers indicated in the waste
utilization plan.
Animal waste shall only be applied to actively growing crops or within 30 days or
less of planting a crop or within 30 days or less of a perennial forage, such as grass,
breaking dormancy. The next appropriate time for 2010 would be in late summer or
fall. Animal waste could be applied to the fescue pasture from August 15 - October
15.-(Spring: February 15-April 15) If small grain is to be planted in the crop fields in
the fall of 2010, 30 lbs of Nitrogen per acre could he applied within 30 days or less of
planting. Optimum dates for planting Oats and Barley: September 15 — October 15;
Wheat and Rye: October 15 —November 15.

The Waste Utilization Plan shows the following for fall application:
Tract
Field
Useable Acres
. Cron
Nitrogen Arent. / Ac.
965
]a, 2a, 3a
48.7
Small Grain
30 lbs
965
lb, 2b, 3b
16.0
Small Grain
30 lbs
965
4
7.6
Fescue Pasture
85 lbs
965
5
10.2
Small Grain
30 lbs
965
6
8.0
Fescue Pasture
85 lbs
965
7
11.9
Fescue Pasture
86 lbs
965
8
16.3
Small Grain
30 lbs
965
9
2.7
Fescue Pasture
90 lbs
585
1
8.9
Small Grain
30 lbs
585
3
20.3
Small Grain
30 lbs
585
4
4.7
Small Grain
30 lbs
Note: If small grain follows soybeans, do not apply waste due to residual Nitrogen
available from soybeans.
Do not apply waste to fields while it is raining or when the ground is saturated. Avoid
spreading prior to predicted rain. A current soil sample is required for all fields receiving
animal waste.
SPECIFICATIONS
The slurry in the waste storage ponds can be removed utilizing the existing irrigation
system in fields 1 a, 2a, 3a of tract 965 or tank hauled and spread on any of the planned
fields on tract 965 or tract 585. The sludge and all remnants of animal waste shall be
scraped from the bottom of the ponds by machinery such as an excavator and
spread utilizing a solids spreader.
Prior to the breaching or removal of the waste storage ponds by grading the
certifying technicians will need to inspect the ponds to verify that all animal waste
and sludge has been removed that is reasonable and practical based on the
technician's visual inspection and judgment.
Closure of this operation must be done without any runoff of the effluent. After removal
of all the waste as certified by the technician, the dam and pond area will be graded and
shaped so as to avoid ponding rainfall runoff and to facilitate seeding and maintaining
vegetation. All pipes will be removed. All disturbed areas will be vegetated according to
NRCS standards. Exclude any pastured livestock until vegetation is well established.
I agree to have a certified Operator In Charge (OTC) for cattle for this facility in
order to supervise and document the application of animal waste.
I agree to close the waste storage pond according to the above plan that meets
NRCS standards. I will schedule the closure of these waste storage ponds with
personnel of the Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District and NRCS and I
will notify the Division of Water Quality 24 hours before the closure is started.
Date: _ - a2 46 .2 a / i)

Animal Waste ��orage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
1 (Please t� it print all information that does not require a ature)
1
General Information:
Name of Farm:
Owner(s) Name:_
Mailing Address:
Facility No -.
Phone No:
County:
Operation Description (remaining animals only):
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. ofAnimals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. ofAnimals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Type of Dairy
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
No. ofAnimals
Number ofAnimals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the G.S. § 143-215.1013 threshold? Yes o No o
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes? Yes o No o
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:
(Name) of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quad ity's Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on (date)
for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the
start of closure, which began on (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature:
Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: _ _ Date:
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,.NC 27699-1636 '
PLC - I May 4, 2007

r
Bridges and Cook Dairy
Waste Storage Pond
"Slurry Pond"
Gallons
Depth of
Gallons
Feet Below
Interval
Removed per
Remaining
Remaining
Elevations
Top Marker
Depth
Interval
Liquid Waste
In Pond
Top Marker 193.4
0
0
0
8.4
5351409
192.4
1.0'
1.0'
85,010
7.4
450,399
191.4
2.0'
1.0'
78,749
6.4
371,650
190.4
3.0,
1.0'
72,731
5.4
-298,919
189.4
4.0'
1.0'
66,951
4.4
231,968
188.4
5.0'
1.0
61,408
3.4
170,560
187.4
6.0'
1.0'
56,106
2.4
114,454
186.4
7.0'
1.0'
51,043-
1.4
63,411
Bottom Pond 185.0
8:4'
1.4'
63,411
0
0

Bridges and Cook Dairy
Waste Storage Pond
"Flush Pond"
Gallons
Depth of
Feet From
Interval,
Removed per
Remaining
Gallons
Elevations
Bottom Pipe
Depth
Interval
Liquid Waste
Remaining
Bottom 22" 193.5
0
0
0
8.5
146,571
PVC Pipe
192.5
1.0'
1.0'
28,762
7.5
117,809
191.5
2.0'
1.0`
25,171
6.5
920638
190.5
3.0'
1.0'
21,622
5.5
70,816
189.5
4.0'
1.0'
18,710
4.5
52,106
188.5
5.0'
1.0'
15,838
3.5
36,268
187.5
6.0'
1.0'
13,205
2.5
23,063
186.5
7.0'
1.0'
10,811
1.5
12,252
Bottom Pond 185.0
8.5'
1.5'
12,252
0
0
Total
146,571

BRIDGES & COOK DAIRY
'SLURRY" WASTE STORAGE POND
ELEVATIONS
TOP DAM: 196.00
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY: 195.00
194.40
193.40 MAXIMUM LIQUID LEVEL
192.40
i91.40.
190.40
TOTAL DEPTH
OF LIQUID 8.4 feet

y
ICDA&:CS'Agrono�ic Di$isloil.; Phoae:�(99j733-2655»';",Web sit+ec wa+w:neagr:gav/agrotiamt/
Report No: 39336
Grower-
Head, Gary/Reba
Copies To:
-
3515 Ken McEntire Rd.
��'�
Soui Repo
Lawndale, NC 28090
4 est r-1
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Received: 05/20/2010 Completed: 05/28/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Cleveland County
Agronomist Comments
Field lnforniatioo s.
Appljetl?Lurie
' Recomn enilations.
'Tmple No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S Crt Zn B Mn See Note
4
Ist Crop: FeVOG/r1rn,M ST
120-200 0 0
0 0 $ 0 .0 0 12
7'-oc f Q615' Xi F& V
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soft Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
11fn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-AI
C11-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N.
Na.--
MIN 0,46 1.07
10.5 78.0
2.3 5.6 224
144
52.0
19.0
103
79
253 253
23
58
0.2_-
TieldInformaiion
Applieii Lime
Seco;a tiendatioiis
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
g S
Cri
Zn
B Mn
See Note
6
Ist Crop: Fes/OG/Iim,M
.8T
I20-200
0
30-50
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
L
74 o f F !d +p
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Sofl Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I
K 1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(l)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N ..,Va, -
MIN 0.60 1.17
8.5 71.0
2.5 5.7 289
52
51.0
I7.0
80
65
27I 271
66
31
0.0
Field Infonnation
Applie&Lime:
=`iteeominendatlon's.
aple No. Lost Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cn
Zn
B Mn
See Note
7
Ist Crop: Fes/OGl1 m,M
0
120-200
0
0
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
7-m G f q4 6Se /W ~f
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Solt Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(l)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-AI
Ca-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
,Va
MTN 0.36 LII
14.0 87.0
1.8 6.2 435
190
58.0
22.0
88
67
446 446
85
56
0A
Field Infot-matIan ; i::
' pplieiE I,ia% _
Recoiiiii dAo' n*s .
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cn
Zn
B Mn
See Nate
8
1St Crop: SmGrain SiVCorn
Stl
1.5T
80- 100
0
120-140
0 0
0
0
I0
-33
f lrwc ( E
2nd Crap:
0
Test Results -
Soil Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.56 1.21
5.6 52.0
2.7 5.3 262
32
34.0
15.0
23
24
81 81
36
33
0.0

,y
,CDAkS Agronamlc Didlsion Phuge:'(919)J33�2655*` , We>s site:ewwcv acagr.gov%agr'ofloif i/
Grower: Head; Gary/Reba
Report No: 39336 Pg 2
"Field information • ',
App lied Lurie;
RecainaiearlatIlias
Sample No. Last Crop
9
Mo Yr r/A
Crop or Year Lime
1st Crop: re"G/rirn,M -3T
2nd Crop:
N P205 1i:20 Mg S
120-200 0 0 0 0
0
Cu Zn B Mn See Note
0 0 .0 0
Test Results
Soil Class 11M% W/Y CEC BS% Ae pH P-1 K-1 Ca% A"
MIN 0.41 1.13 14.6 85.0 2.2 5.9 700 124 69.0 12.0
Mn-I Mn-Affl) Mn AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI
235 158 749 k 749
Cu-1 S-1 S5-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na.
74 52 0.I
e
f
i
- 3
i
North Carol i na Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded !
-' through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Z 3' Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission

,Ar
CI)A&CS Agronomic D sioiill' -� Pharie' {g19)733 2b55'We115ite tirovty dcag.gav/agro�onii/ '
Report No: 32639
Grower:
A
oil "t ReP"rt
Bridges, Kevin/Charles
1111 Bridges Dairy Rd
Shelby, NC 28150
Copies To:
f
F"I
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Farm:
Received: 03/15/2010 Completed: 04/13/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Cleveland County
Agronomist Comments
FieldIsfomatlon p
Applied!Lhli E'Mecbntmen
atlonst�,
Vample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
1
Ist Crop: Small Grains 0
80-100 0 0
0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ -3
%rain 96S f' /aj & 3LL
2nd Crop: Corn,Siiage 0
180-220 0 0
0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ �
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NW-N NH4-N-
Na ..
MIN 0.41 1,01
11.4 89.0
1.2 6.5 427
524
36.0
3I.0
I58
97
104
357 357
154
286
-2.9.:
Field Information
�Applled Llme
Reeomme datlons
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr r/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Ma
See Nate
,
/lave In
1st Crop: Soybeans
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
pH$
3-
svasfc fit,
2nd Crop: Cam,Silage
0
180-220
0
0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
-1
_
;
Test Results
•'
soft class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS -I NO3-N
AWN . Mi l
MIN 0.27 0.99
15.4 97.0
0.4 6.9 408
517
49.0
32.0
180
104
111
446 446
193
285
2.6 '
Field Information r.
; ;Applied I;i>eie ?
Recoteimendatinns;;
.
imp le No. Last Crop
Mo Yr ZIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cis
Zn
B Mn
See Note
3
Ist Crop: Corn,Silage
.6T
180-220
0
0-20
0 0
0
0
.0 0
3
%tect
2nd Crop: Com,Silage
0
180-220
0
0-20
0 0
0
0
.0 0
-3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.81 1.08
7.2 75.0
1.8 5.7 201
119
46.0
21.0
105
80
80
197 197
84
92
0.5
Field lufortnatioa j
Applle ! i;ime >
4 Reca"mmen`dafions -
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Crr
Zn
B Mn
See Note
4
1st Crop: Corn,Sliage
0
180-220
0
50-70
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
"
,S-
2nd Crop: Com,Silage
0
180-220
0
50-70
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(i)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zrr-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
AWN_ •
Na ;
MIN 0.46 1.00
8S 90.0
0.9 6.5 123
69
58.0
28.0
125
84
84
215 215
67
4I
0.1

�1
L
NQDAIfCS Agrbnam#c biv4sian
Phone:;(gig)�3.3.2655 _ Web'site www,nc gr.gov/agronam9/
..
;Grower_' _Bridges KevWcharies .;
",Report No: 32639 Pg 2
Field-Wormation_rApplied
Lune ¢
' Recariiinendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205 K20 Mg S Ca
Zn B Mn See Note
5
1St Crap: Corn,Stlage
LIT
180-220
0-20 90-110 0 0 0
0 .0 0 -3
7- . — 46S
2nd Crop: Com,Silage
0
180-220
0-20 40-110 0 0 0
0 .0 0 -3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac PH P-I K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Mn—AI(l) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn AI Cu-I
S-I SS -I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.51 1.20
4.4 57.0 1.9 5.1 76 46
39.0 12.0
40
41 41 82 82 33
43 0.1
North Carolina
sue" i•:
Tob2CCo Trust Fund Commission
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission: .
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients_and safeguard environmental quality..
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture ',

` cbMCS; Agr_odomic Division Phonei (919 733 2655 „ . Webisite s ncag gov/agrgnomi/
:Report; W06045
Grower
Bridges, Kevin/Charles
Copies to:
3370 Bridges Dairl
Rd
Shelby, NC 28150
s
tl
Waste Analysis Report
pa.
Received: 02/26/2010
Completed: 03/03/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Cleveland County
Sample Informatton : -
Labdratory Resu]ts (parts per mlllioa ualess titfierwlse aoted}
Sample ID:.
N
P K Ca M8
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu
B Mo Cl C
i
Total 102
49.9 302 181 77.8
31.1
6.35 1.09
0.67
0.28
0.46
IN-N
11e Coder
-NH4
Na Ni- Cd Pb
Al
Se Li
pH
SS
ON DM% CCE% AL£(K
LSD
-NO3
89.3
6.46
Description:
OR-N
Dairy Li . Slurry
Urea
Recomiendations:
` .-Nutrients AQlabieldr First Crop
Ibs%1000 gallons
Other Elements Ibs/1000 gallons
Application Method
1'205 120 Ca..I Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cu
B Mo
Cl
Na
Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Irrigation
0.67 ; 2.4 1.1, 0.45` 0.18 o-M 0.01
FO'3
T T
T
0.74
Broadcast
0.67 2.4 ' 1:1- ,_ 0.45 - 0.18 0.04 0.01
T T
T
0.74
Completed• 3/2/2010
Sample Info`ri iatian' ; . •
Lahoratory.. esuits (parts penis iilioa anises otherwise noted)
Sample IDr ;"":
N
P K Ca
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Ca
B hfo Cl C
2
Total 258
199 528 559 213
101
84.7 6.05
5.40
1.35
0,95
`' ==
LV N
it�aste Code:,...
NH4
Na Ni Cd Pb
Al
Se Li
pH
SS
CN DM96 CCE% ALE(Kgal)
LSD-_. _
NO3
140
6.35
'*ipttonr
OR-N
Li . Slurry
Urea
Recommendations'
Nutrieats�A Ilable for. First Cro
Ibs/1000 allows
Other,Blements Ibs/1000 allows
Application kelhod
N P205 120Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cry
B Mo
Cl
Na
NI Cd Pb At Se if
Irr pdon
0.86. 2.7 ° 4.2 3.3 L2 0.59 0.49 0.04
o.o4 0.01
0.01
1.2
Broadcast'
0.93 : 2.7 i 4.2 3.3 ,.. 1.2 0.59 0.49 o.04
0.04 .0.01
0.01
1.2
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
�- through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
tobacco trust Fund C ommisston

NCDA&gAgronamic D,i�isiunt. yPhone i(g3g)733=2655 ; We1r site wwiv.ncag�r:govfagronoirii% ,
Report: W05753
Grower
Bridges, Kevin
Copies to:
••_<+3C1u1TV&{
PO Box 35
;.;.
Polkville, NC 28136
W-
��. aste A nalysis Report
Farnz
m t
Received: 02/19/2009 Completed: 02/26/2009 links to Helpful Information
Cleveland County
Sample lnforinat6ni-
.-l.abaratory'Results'{parts per-inlllioa nuless"o`il ersvlse noted):
Sample 1D:
N
P X Ca M9
S
Fe Mir
Zn
Cu
B MO Cl C
Total 500
215 691 436 240
63.3
28A U1
4.49
0.94
0.47
IN-N
.sle Code:
NH4
Na Ni Cd Pb
Al
Se Li
pH
SS
C.N DM% CC6% ALE
LSD
NO3
182
6.54
llescrlptlon
OR N
Dal`"LC '. Slu
Urea
IiAolini ttdatlons: I
Nutrients Avallable for. First Crop-Ibs11000
gaubm.
'Other Elements lbs/1000 allons
App/lcallon Method
N P205 "'DO Ca big 5 Pe Mn
Zn Cu
B MO
CI
Na
Ni Cd P8 Al Se Ll
irrigaaon
l'i 2.9 5:5 2,5, I;4 0.37 0,17 0.02
0.03 0.01
T
1.5
Broadcast-`
1"8 2.9 5.5 -2.5:" . 1A 0.37 0.17 0.02
0.03 0.0I
T
1.5
'Complete6 2l26/2009 `
S
�..:r *:
Sample Information ,�
. 1A6rator' IC6ula'(parts`per'million unless otlierwfse,rioteii)
Sample ID: -.
N
P ,C Ca At
S
Pe Mn
Zn
Ca
B Mo Cl C
Total 148
63.1 442 175 90.0
22.7
9.18 0.95
0.89
018
0.07
2"
LV-N
Waste Code:.
-NH4
Na Nf Cd Ph
Al
Se Li
pH
SS
C•N DM% CCE% ALE(K )
LSD'
-NO3
102
6.72
'riptfon
OR-N
Li " Slurry
Urea
Recommendations;
' Nvtrlents Available for First Crop
lbS11000 gallons
Other Elements ibs/1000 allons
Application Method
N P205 -4120 ° Ca.• ; Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cn
B No
C1
No
Nl Cd Pb Al Se Lt
Irrlgaaon
0.49 0.84 : 3.5 1.6 0,53 0.13 0105 0.01
0.01 T
T
0.85
Broadcast
0.53 0.84 3.5 1.0 0.53 0.13 U5 0.01
0.01 T
T
0.85
MOOS: B c 500 !!!!s!!#!!
Tobacco (rust Fund Commission
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible Is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

q,,
�1VC6 CS-A#o9oMiC-DMsldn.r'Phone : ,We pite:mw ticagr;gov, agrono
Report W01627
Grower.,
Bridges, Kevin/Charles.
Copies to:
IJ
3370 Bridges Dairy
Rd
Shelby, NC 28150
ti
Waste Analysi's Report
Parnr Cook
Received: 09/0212008 Completed: 09/03/2008 Links to Helpful Information
Cleveland County
Sample
Uborit6 Iteli 16 i, llk'n�,uikis'o-tih-i M W)' se note
ry
S,ii*e id.
N
P K Ca Mg
S
Fe Mn
Z"
Cu
B Mo CI C
Total 2601
534 1362 1097 486
246
148 16.0
10.5
4.18
2.05
INN
ate Code.,
-NH4
Na M Cd A
At
Se U
PH
5S
C.-N DM% CCE% ALE(Kgal)
LSD
-NO3
348
6.83
Desc? lPtlox:
OR-JV
Dal6`afSiry
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients iral(Ak for First Crop
lbs11000 gallons
Other Elements lbs11000 gglons
Appcao,i method
.
N� P205 K20 ri; Mg S Fe Mn
ZA C"
5 Mo
Cl
No
ivi Cd Pb At SO U
Irrigation
8.7 7.1 1019 ..6.4 2.8 IA 0.87 0.09
0.07 0.03
0,01
2.9
Broadcast
9.3 7-1 1o.9 ;6.4 is, 1.4 0.87 0.09
0.07 0.03
0.01
2.9
The waste contains i large2m4nt of nitrogen. To proterfifie.environment, to apply thi waste only 21 rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement.
A
Sampteln6irmation
iniftlo-a" 4@6i0iihi4
ry per, otherwise rioted)
Sample ID.-
IV-
P K Ca Afg
S
Pe Mn
zn
Ca
8 Mo CI C
Total 1224
186 503 627 240
267
401 11.4
1t-3
4,20
2.03
02.
IN-jV
Wane Code:
-NH4
LSD - "'
-NO3
Na Ivi Cd Pb
Al
SO U
pH
SS
G.-N' DNS CCE% ALE(KgA)
too
F
6.54
OR-N
Li . St'
Urea
Recommen(btions: I
Xjtjjjdts Available for First'Crop
lbsllooOgallow
Other Elements lbs/1000gallons
AppMkati6dMe4bod
N P205 :120 Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Z12 cr,
B Mo
a
Na ,
M Cd Pb Al Se U
-Ifi*96n
4.1 2.5 4.0 317 1.4 1.6 2.3 .0.07
0.08 0.03
0.01
0.84
4.4 2.5 4,0 3.7 1.4 1.6 2.3 0.07
0.08 0.03j
0.01
0.84
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
lob;3cco [rust Fund Commission Steve TroxIer, Commissioner of Agriculture

3:fr
1QCbAik AgrOnolnie Division: , Phorie ' - J ..
'''(919)733=2d55„����Weti' Site: w*v.ecagr':gov/agroriomi%
Report; W05225
Cromer.,
Bridges, Kevin
Copies to:
*�
PO Sox 35
Polkville, NC 28136
o
Waste Analysis Report
Farm Cook
Received: Q2/11/2008 Linkto Helpful Information
Cleveland County
Sample ln, rmatlon
iLAW ratory,Resvlti4arts:per.'tnlllinu unless utlierivlse uote�
Srrirvple'!D `.',
N
P K Ca Mg S
Pe Mn Zn
Ca B Mo
Cl C
Total 3171
964 1977 2374 915 451
296 33.7 25.2
7.33 2.01
IN-N
e Code:
NH4
Na M Cd Pb Al
Se Li pH
SS ON DMW
CCE% ALE(K )
LSD _,
-NO3
504
7.12
Description:
OR-N
Dairy Li . Slurry
Urea
Ric • iniiiendatlons:
Nutrients'Av411able'for First Crop
1bs11000aliens
Other Elements
1bs11000 alions
Application Method
N P205 K20 Ca V S Pe Mn Tar Ca
B bfo CI
Na Nt Cd P6
Al Se Li
Irrigation
10.6 12.9 15.8 13.9 5.3 2A 1.7 0.20 0.17 0.05
0.01
4.2
The waste product oontains large amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and zinc. The waste should be applied at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement unless one of the other
elements are more restrictive.
When`soll test Pis very high and
the site is vulnerable to, phosp6 rus movement to neartiy,surfatie water, limit application of P to estimated crop removal of this element. Limit zinc application as necessary to avoid
excess'accuinulallon of this element in the soil.
Sainple Information
i' la6oratoryResnits (parts per:rutlliog unless oche wfse noted):
Sample
N
P K Ca Afg S
Pe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo
CI C
' s
-2 - -
Total 1134
240 631 885 317 311
466 14.7 17.5
4.58 0.00
:'
INN
WastewCode:
-NH4
1 ,::'.=_ ,• •�.;,
-NO3
Na M Cd Pb At
Se Li pH
SS C-N DAM
C0% ALE
De , iption
OR-N
132
6.6
Dal Ll . Slurry
Urea
Recommendations;
1 Nutrfeiits Availabli fbr First Crop
lbs Io00 allons
Other Elements
ibs11000 gallons
Application Melhod
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Pe Mn Zn Cn
B Mo Cl
Na Ni Cd Pb
Al Se M
Irrigation
3.8 3.2 5.1 5.2 1.9 1.8 2.7 0.09 0.I2 0.03
0.00
1.1
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
r through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
aL Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
'fa6hcca trust Fund Commission -Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

+5'A.-1��_ �11 AMM s• ` . { 2 d.,^LYI" iff •A,Z 1k 1
�;��5.. j �x�' }" ,�' �� to ' ��t•r h ems, � 1 � .,, �� �� _ • • � , N 11� , ,,� � r�....��_
mr
71
Wks
Ic
60 ft.
buffer
200 ft. buffer
ouse
��y1i1 �• _ +x e� ;���,�:�nkr�• `ii���t4��,j�`,� �"A: � aE•'f �F'i.." ` 1.• r; .!' `�r+^7} { yrry
F : � I]�. ���--ram- .� ,l\ r � �'_"`-='_' % 5� ` r�! r4•r�;. ' � i r
L s1 M i?iy: ;�M'., � � r�.v� �. �' �,� �a ,.,` . � I,IY.1►JC! : � ,� 5��-a��e: �- ;. ,•4 � , ��;
r�':Y5 .4.. • i'ja •. .+! + 4 'r«. �' -y '� •E' a !� s + .• � 1 ' .'
��a { /.vY , � lj 'r4•' ,. , � %
Z'`L t. i l`x r' �t • . .v� I,S
from h
•t' S
L w�$1 !ec- �• >t1a g'-e:�L 'tln �� �' . i" �q� �`' `y�,L' � . N ti� . 1 {
%.�, li5'4`•�.,r�. '�F'1'���-': �� `r�� i `l ��� 'zr'Y. � ti- � r . i� R yi
� •',4.41 r��i r �� x F1�L.t�' f��w• l � � � -,k�� \' a �',L. �-ter!'--`- w�f�j, Jf,.x.,,- ,/' F �y -�d• '',t,,,r
.1 ," � . r, 'i► �'\ r.` r= . �� .7'-r.[!? fix. � !t> 4 .r: - f Yy r - � 1 4� }� I f
' k� ! ! � � •sLu 1. i �1J : 7' a °� �' ra•� • `"`Mii {1'`t��`. r. %. � � _•__-., • �j � x, 5�`� � -�� � �L-iCSh ' ''
r r�Y rs♦ 7 y '��A 14"-0' j�/'t .,•;� �ty� > r +r5'.Y a.
%
REM
�-s1 •.''}I y ,�
r it •b � ^„ '�� � r • 1 '
,+i � ++r, �, �5, �Y;'�r'.t - ./• +•� ' � i } -� � Lit.._ }'-.x • 7� 1.� 4"' � • il�
.� i r ��''r(trrrlC- 3 +s `'�c('e ��y�rye. i r �' y }: �� L •' �1 �....` rlt �],x +�ry: � •p•`r � '�
1r• [.f.•li.�.'¢' 4JYf,�'.C�ya Yi.-ri _lt,�rE��•...-.' �l� � �� I+j !� `,7 a!'

{
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
06-07-2010
This plan has been prepared for:
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Kevin Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd
Lawndale, NC 28090-9672
[phone]
This plan has been developed by:
P. Benjamin Robinson, Jr.
NRCS
844 Wallace Grove Drive
Shelby, NC 28150-9213
[phone] Ex 3
_2?es- _
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Z�k &" &
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
�f.2'V-
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: _ �,
tY/—Z'CZd
Technical Specialist Signature Date
----------- —--------------------------------------------•--------.--------..-----
3096d3 Database Version 3.1.
•- -- ------ ---------- •-------
.Date Printed: 06-07-2010 - Cover Page

•,
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
Ul
130 Milk cows, 50% confinement waste generated 1,379,950 gals/year by a 130 animal
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen.Generated per Year
Broadcast
4884
Incorporated
6661
Injected
7549
irrigated
4440
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year l
4,884
43913
-39,029
10,569,448
-9,189,498
S44
Dairy (Calf) Solid waste generated 123.00 tons/year by a 30 animal Dairy (Calf) Solid
operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
529
Incorporated
701
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
529
5664
-5,135
1,317.19
-1,194.19
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG43942
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
---------- ---- - ----- -- ------ ------••-- ---------- - •-- -------- ---- --
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified,in the plan for this source.
309643 Database Version.3.1, • Date Printed: 06-077.20 6- ' ••Source Page'Page l of I .

Y
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High,
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(lWacre)
585
1
9.20
8.90
Medium
N/A
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
55
N/A
Com, Silage
21,2 Tons
72
N/A
585
3
20.60
20.30
Medium
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
56
N/A
Com, Silage
21.9 Ton
74
N/A
585
4
6.3
4.70
Medium
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
55
N/A
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
72
NIA
965
1 a,2a,3a
48.70
48.70
Low
N/A
Appling
Small Grain, Silage
10.9 Tons
59
N/A
Com, Silage
23.8 Tons
81
N/A
965
1b,2b,3b
17.90
16.00
Medium
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
56
N/A
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
74
NIA
965
4
8.50
7.60
Low
NIA
Appling
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8
NIA
965
5
10.50
10.20
Medium
NIA
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.4'rons
56
NIA
Cam, Silage
21.9 Tons
74
N/A
965
6
8.7
8,00
Low
N/A
Appling
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8
N/A
965
7
13.00
11,90
Low
N/A
Appling
Fescue Pasture
5.2 Tons
8
N/A
965
8
1 16.5
16.30
Medium
N/A
Appling
Small Grain, Silage
10.6 Tons
57
NIA
Corn, Silage
23.0 Tons
78
N/A
965
9
3. I
2.701
Medium
N/A
Appling
Fescue Pasture
5.4 Tons
9
N!A
PLAN TOTALS: IW.01/ 155,30
309643 y.�,l]atabasc,Version 3 1 Date Printed 6/7/2010
�• PCs Page Page 1 of2 ,
NOTE: Symbol* means user entered data.

is
otenha I LeachIng
Guidance
,
.Technical -,4-
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
0 1 >
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of --field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLATlndes
J,9
ou 1, Re Recommendation 4 tjy
PU 7,
Management qment c6
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25-50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 -100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
'309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6n12010
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol means user entered data.

-The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
'Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
N
N
N
N
Iwo
gai/A
Tons
1000 gals
585
1
U1
Cecil
9.20
8.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
112
31,64
0.00
281.61
0.00
585
1
UI
Cecil
9.20
8.90
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6130
231
0
0
Broad.
231
65.26
0.00
580.93
0.00
3
Ul
Cecil
20,60
20.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
32.49
0,00
659.54
0.00
L
3
UI
Cecil
20.60
20.30
Corn, Silage
1.9 Ton
2115-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
23
67,52
0,00
1,370.690.00
4
Ul
Cecil
6.30
4.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Ton
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
11
31.64
0.00
148.72
0.00
585
4
U1
Cecil
6.30
4.70
Corn, Silage
21.2 Ton
2/15-6130
231
0
0
Broad.
231
65.26
0.00
306.73
0.00
,965.
la,2a,3a
Ul
Appling
48.70
48.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.9 Ton
9/1-3/31
121
0
0
Irrig.
l l
35.741
0,00
1,740.46
0.00
965 '
la 2'a,3a
U1
Appling
48.70
48.70
Corn, Silage
23.8 Ton
2/15-6/30
259
0
0
Irrig.
239
26.56
0.00
1,293.36
0.00
965
Ib,2b,3b
S44
Icecil
17.90
16.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
427 9'
965
Ib,2b,3b
U1
Cecil
17.90
16.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3131
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
965.
lb,2b,3b
S44
Cecil
17.90
16.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6130
239
0
0
Broad.
239
0.00
55.58
0,00
889.29
965
4
UI
Appling
8.50
7.60
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
811-7/31
170
0
0
Broad.
170
48.03
0.00
365A1
0.00
965 '
5
U1
Cecil
10.50
10.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
32.49
0.00
331.39
0.00
965
5
Ul
Cecil
10.50
10.20
Corn, Silage
21.9 Ton
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
67.52
0.00
688.72
0.00
965
6
UI
Appling
8,70
8.00
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
811-7131
170
0
0
Broad.
170
48.03
0.0
394.22
0.00
965
7
U1
Appling
13.00
11.90
Fescue Pasture
5.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
4
0
Broad.
173
48.88
0.00
581.62
0.00
' 309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/7/2010 WUT Page Page t of 2

WaefP-T1f1 Ta+;nn T9hlP
xr 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
T
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop C
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Mamt eA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
965 '
:. 8
U1
Appling
16.50
16.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.6 Ton
9/1-3/31
118
0
0
Broad.
118
33.34
0.00
543.39
0.00
965
8
U1
Appling
16.50
16.30
Cont, Silage
23.0 Ton
2/15-6/30
251
0
0
Broad.
251
70.91
0.00
1,155.86
0.00
965
9
U1
Appling
3.10
2.70
Fescue Pasture
5.4 Tons
8/1-7/31 1
180
0
0
Broad.
180
50.95
0,00
137.30
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
10,569,45
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,379 95�
�F
Balance, 1000 gallons
-9,189.5
Total Applied, tons
,.:
1,317.19
Total Produced, tons
P
123.00
Balance, tons`{
-1,194.19
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
" 309643 Database Version 3.1
3 `
2. Symbol * means user entered data -
Date Printed: 6/7/2010
WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inchies/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
965
la,2a,3a
Appling
0.45
1.0
W
309643, ;.,Database Version 3.1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Date. Printed: 6/7/2010 ,.
IAF.,Page,Page'<l'_off .i1.!...

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Q
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(Ions/A)
Tract Field
5$5
I
Req'd Nutrients
112
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
8.90
911-3131
Supplied By:
c
g
Y
w
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
10.1 Tons
03-11-08
Manure
112
Ito
167
541
2
21
1
0
P Removal
IRating
55 lbs/ae.
Medium
BALANCE
0
110
167
541
2
2
1
0
Tract
IField
585
3
Req'd Nutrients
115
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
20.30
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
W %
;'?j� l
mW:ma'
;
wpm
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
1 03-11-08
Manure
115
113
172
55
2
2
1
0
P Removal
IRating
56 lbs/ae.
Hcdium
BALANCE
0
1131
172
55
2
2
i
1 0
Tract
Field
585
4
Req'd Nutrients
112
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.70
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
n"
's !
.;
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.1 Tons
03-11-08
Manure
112
110
167
54
2
2
1
0
P Removal
Rating
55 Ibs/ac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
110
167
54
2
2
1
0
Tract
Field
965
la,2a,3a
Req'dNutrients
121
0
40
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App, Period
48.70
9/1-3l31
Supplied By:
�Nti T.
MAIN
11 W
MM�
"O,O
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.9Tons
03-11-08
Manure
115
125
189
61
2
31
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
59 lbslac.
IL
BALANCE
I -6
125
149
61
2L
11
1
1
309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/7/2010
NMR Page Page 1 of

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
965
lb,2b,3b
Req'd Nutrients
115
0
40
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App.
Period
16.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
03-I 1-08
Manure
115
116
163
59
2
2
01
0
P Removal Rating
56 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
116
123
59
2
2
0
-1
Tract Field
965
5
Req'd Nutrients
Hs.
0
50
0
0
0
0
2
Acres
A Period
App.
10.20
9/1-3/31
Supplied B :
PP Y
r rf
��.,+ �.
"'"�
�. ��_,._
"` '�`�
��',':ttr�
�` i 1-1111
qr��,�
�¢:�
�
� `
+.Yl
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen,
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
03-11-08
Manure
115
113
172
55
2
2
1
0
oval Rating
56 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
113
122
55
2
2
1
-2
ER
Field
965
8
Req'd Nutrients
118
0
30
0
0
0
0
l
App. Period
16.30
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
MW'
t
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.6 Tons
03.11-08
Manure
118
116
176
57
2
2
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
57 Ibs/ac,
Medium
BALANCE
0
116
146
57
2
2
1
-1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/7/2010 NMR Page Page 2 of

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1 N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn Zn
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Cu Dime
(lbs/A) (tonslA)
Tract
Field
585
1 Req'd Nutrients 231
0
30
0
0 0
0 0
Acres App.
Period
8.90
2/15-6130 Supplied By:
I
0
O
IW �,, ��
CROP
Corn, Silage Starter, , 0
Commercial Fen, 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Cecil Residual 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
RYEJ Sample Date
21.2 Tons
03-11-08 Manure 231
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
P Removal
I Rating
72 Ibs/ac.
Medium BALANCE 0
0
-30
0
0 0
01 0
Tract
Field
585
3 Req'd Nutrients 239
0
0
0
0 4
0 0
Acres App.
Period
20.30
2115-6/30 Supplied By:
Im. MOW
CROP
Corn, Silage I Starter 0
Commercial Fert. 0
0
0
0
01 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Cecil Residual 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
RYE Sample
Date
21.9 Tons
03-11-08 Manure 239
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
P Removal IRating
74lbslac.
Mcdium BALANCE 0
0
0
01
0 0
0 0
Tract
Field
585
4 Req'd Nutrients 231
0
10
0
0 0
0 0
Acres
App. Period
4.70
2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
a !
'1
`"r
. 3
_ i MOM
CROP
Com, Silage Starter 0
Commercial Fen. 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Cecil Residual 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
RYEI Sample Date
21.2 Tons
1 03-11-08 Manure 231
0
0
0
0 0
01 0
P Removal
Rating
72 Ibs/ac.
Medium BALANCE 0
0
-10
0
0 0
0 0
Tract
Field
965
Ib,2b,3b Req'dNutrients 239
0
90
0
0 0
0 0
Acres
App. Period
16.00
2115-6130 Supplied By:
1+`
rm N
CROP
Corn, Silage Starter 0
Commercial Fert. 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Cecil Residual 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
RYE Sample
Date
21.9 Tons
03-11-08 Manure 239
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
P Removal
Rating
74 lbs/ac.
Medium BALANCE 0
0
-90
0
0 0
0 0
Tract
Field
965
4 Req'd Nutrients 170
0
20
0
0 0
0 1
Acres I App. Period
7.60
811-7/31 Supplied By:
_w
MOM MR -
CROP
Fescue Pasture Starter 0
Commercial Fert. 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Appling Residual 0
0
0
0
4 01
01 0
RYE Sample
Date
5.1 Tons
03-11-08 Manurel 1701
168
254
82
3 3
1 0
P Removal Rating
8 Ibslac.
w BALANCE 0
168
234
82
3 3
l -1
309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/7/2010 NMR Page Page 3 of 4

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn Cu
(lbs/A) (ibs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
965
5
Req'd Nutrients
239
0
110
0
0
0 0
0
Acres App.
Period
10,20
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:jA,.
"
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Sample
Date
21.9 Tons
03-11-08
Manure
239
0
0
0
0
0 0
0oval
Rating
74 Ibs/ac.
edium
BALANCE
0
0
-110
0
0
0 0
0
E
Field
965
6
Req'd Nutrients
170
0
20
0
0
0 0
1
App.
Period
8.00
811-7/31
Supplied By:
p
tr
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
.0
0
0
0 0
0
Commercial Fed.
0
01
0
01
0
0 01
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
01
01
0 0
0
RYE Sample
Date
5.1 Tons
03-11-09
Manure
170
168
254
82
3
3 1
0
P Removal
Rating
8 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
168
234
82
3
3 1
-1
Tract
Field
965
7
Req'd Nutrients
173
0
20
0
0
0 0
1
Acres I
App. Period
11.90
811-7/31
Supplied By:
Mill -
Y
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Commercial Fen,
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
5.2 Tons
03-11-08
Manure
173
171
258
83
3
4 1
0
P Removal
Rating
8 lbs/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
171
238
83
3
4 1
-1
Tract Field
965
8
Req'd Nutrients
251
10
80
0
0
0 0
0
Acres
A Period
16.30
2115 6/30
Supplied B
F?_
1 t'
tip+ r
t" a
i aF
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0 01
0
Commercial Fen.
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
RYEJ Sample
Date
23.0 Tons
03-11-08
Manure
251
0
0
0
0
0 01
0
P Removal
Rating
78 lbs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
-10
-80
0
0
0 0
0
Tract
I Field
965
9
Req'd Nutrients
180
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.70
8/1-7/31
upplied By.
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Startcr
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Commercial Fen,
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
01
0
0
0
0 01
0
RYE Sample
Date
5.4 Tons
5-20-10
Uium
Manure
180
178
269
87
3
4 1
0
P Removal
Rating
9 lbs/ac.
BALANCE
0
178
269
87
3
4 1
1 0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 6/7/2010 NMR Page Page 4 of 4

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/-)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
585
1
Small Grain, Silage
5.6
0.0
59
None
152
None
585
1
Corn, Silage
5.6
0.0
59
None
152
None
585
3
Small Grain, Silage
6.0
0.0
71
None
311
None
585
3
Corn, Silage
6.0
0.0
71
None
311
None
585
4
Small Grain, Silage
5.4
0.0
54
None
196
None
585
4
Corn, Silage
5.4
0.0
54
None
196
None
965 i
Ia,2a,3a
Small Grain, Silage
5.3
0.9
53
None
175
None
965.
1b,2b,3b
Small Grain, Silage
5.3
0.9
55
None
194
None
965
1b,2b,3b
Corn, Silage
5.3
0.0
55
None
194
None
965' '
4
Fescue Pasture
5.0
0.6
57
None
69
None
965'
5
Small Grain, Silage
5.3
1.6
49
Hone
95
None
965
5
Corn, Silage
5.3
0.0
49
None
95
None
965
6
Fescue Pasture
5.0 1
0.6
57
None
69
None
965
7
Fescue Pasture
5.0
0.6
57
None
69
None
965:;
S. ,
Small Grain, Silage
5.1
1.0
29
None
54
None
965
8
Corn, Silage
5.1
0.01
29 1
None
54
None
965.
9.
Fescue Pasture
5.9
0.31
74 1
None
749
None
.309643
-- - - ---------------------------------------------------
Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 06-07-2010
STV Page Page 1 of I

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Availnhle Waste 4tnrnve (nnncity
Source Name
130 Milk cows, 50% confinement
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
149
1
6
119
1
7
88
1
8
64
1
9
180
L
10
180
1
11
150
1
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
309643 Database Version 3.1
- ---------------- - -------------------------
Date Printed: 06-07-2010 Capacity Page Page 1 of I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste.
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offske or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
.---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------
309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/7/2010 . Specification Page 1-

M
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. 309643 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/7/2010 . Specification Page 2:

FM
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. 1f animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (S)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I --------------------------•---- •-------
309643 Database Version 3.1- Date Printed: 6/7/2010 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4, 6, 7, 9
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, la,2a,3a, Ib,2b,3b, 3, 4, 5, 8
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
------------------------------------------------------------•-------------...------------------------------------------------------- I -
309643 . -..Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-07-2010 . Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2

W
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1a,2a,3a, lb,2b,3b, 3, 4, 5, 8
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
---- - ------------------------•------------------------------------------- ------------------- - -----------------
309643 1 . Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:. 06-07-2010 . CropNote Page Page 2 of 2 .

y i Drvtsftin of•Water Quality t_ ° „ i
' Facility Namber.� 6� y0 Division of Soil; and Water Conservation ` €
:�.0 Other Agency, f
u..
Type of Visit At Compliance Inspection 0 operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit @ Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: t2A0 Arrival Time: Departure Time: �'� 4- Count': _ C Region:""--V
Farm Name: Owner Email: _
Owner Name: �_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone
Onsite Representative: � � _ Integrator:
Certified Operator: �/�t--' �' Y 1 ► - _ Operator Certification Number, -2k_s��
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedei
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑ ` ❑ " Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ ' ❑
Design Current . Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
Non-Layet
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity P0_pp1$liQn
Cow
1
'airy Calf
rai
Dai Heifei
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Socket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?, ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) El ❑ N ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yej0N A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye ❑ NA [INE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Ye❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

4�.
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes >047 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [INE
Structur i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 tructure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental tVjat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes \ Flo ❑ NA [INE
, maintenance/improvement? �" -
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving cry npSdiffer from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yeso
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes XN
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes to
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ElYes
I S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑NA [I NE
El NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
_ l •ii" !Itll� _
i
Reviewer/inspector Name 7 ty`3� S fii G o a d'�� k . Phone:
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued
f

Facility dumber: — I Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Ye sl o NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have al compone�f the CAWMP r ily avai able? If yes, check ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. WUp Checklists Dfe., Maps „L_, Qthheer
21. Does re ord keeping need imp ovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ,—,,� ❑ Yes LQo ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Application:: Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis oil Analysis � waste Transfers fE nnuai Certification
. tainfall ❑zecking ❑ ,Cpr-Celd ❑jZT61inute Inspections Monthly and I" Rain Inspections Q-Weeather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of er encv situaijuns as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, r application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ eN NE
❑ Yes❑ No NE
❑ Yes.�h[o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A El NE
[I Yes ' El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No>5;� ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA
❑ NE
El yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
Adtditional;Coinments's�ndlarDrawings y:
�'r �-,
.;,� �•e.. �,%'{a;,ti �rf�, Y `�axti
12128104

® Division of Water Quality
Facility 'Yu b,er �� Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
.� Q Other Agency -�
Type of Visit f) Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complain Follow up O Referr rgency O Other ❑ Denied Access
� p
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: r Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: R Owner Email: '
Owner Name: _ _ Phone:
Mailing Address: Z_ A
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: '
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
1❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other .
❑ Other
Phone No:
integrator -
Operator Certification Number:o_S?__
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ e❑ 6 Longitude: = o a i
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
MEkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
C,,Rule Capacity PQPULation
C�Dairy Cow
Mairy Calf
O
2�
ai Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -:Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No.NA ❑ NE
i
❑ Yes ❑ No�1A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
�NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o El NA [] NE
❑ Ye ?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number; — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate`? ❑ YA o ❑ NA ❑-NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑No hfA �❑ NE
S�cµctur i Structur Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
[dentifier: }�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [3-*on NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme tal threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [IYe❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes ❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1p__� NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Ye- ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metros (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Applicati%nOWstde of Area
I2. Crop type(s) G U ` V\
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes - ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?) % __3 j 1 ❑ YQS, _NoA❑ YAQ NE
"fi!F.i� `- �. ii- -films ke J"".'e'.3 K�j1b5b'4a eL4 `.ixYF•t i YJlrs� • Mif'% iS' "ti�'"'r�51 .�y1. 3 ^
,Comments.(refer to question #):��'Explain any�YES,anawers-andloran -'recommendations,orsany othe 'co
—k�.a"r .�.:tt1w<.,'vC m>�= �,rn� `=..y�'v�'v�"adt'Sn�SkW]' :: �+r
tllse: drawgs of facility tb better explain s€tuat€ons. (use addlt€o es as necessa .
t i i�u .trL `ss._
�agO _ - 1
2 a ; 7•, rt]Y - %C`"r -4., n2�i{
Reviewer/inspector Namer: ' + zc r r. , h�a_Hr�k.a'; .� ��, w*� w�aa phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
"ired Records & Documents
19.
Did'the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes oNA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components o WMP rea�di! available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑Yes o NA
❑ NE
Checklists ❑ sign aps er
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application eekly Freeboard �]�ste Analysis oil Analysis aste Transfers a Certification
Rainfall E>t<king op Yield 0 Minute Inspections fonthly and V
Rain Inspections -0-�V3ther Code
22,
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes No
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ NA
❑ YC�$
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes =No ❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No❑ NE
Other
Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes J�<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31,
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ YesNA
AZ�O:t
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)k'_e
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes i o NA
❑ NE
Additional Comtnents`and%or Drawings "" �" is ��. "_ •', » ° a•r S y F 3 spy=µ ram. .l�f !' tl' `'
12128104

r
Fac1.ilit1. i°.Number
® Division of Water Quality
f : •0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation i� . A
Q-Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Q Complaint CiFollow u 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date or visit: �b�°'�D`{ Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: I "C - �� ��'� Owner Email: _
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: _
Certified Operator: _ G 0_ Y`
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator: _
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location=0Longitude: 0
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other ,
❑ Other
Design Current . Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Ca*city Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
D Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
v
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA DINE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
qNE
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
NE
❑ NA
❑
E
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
12128104

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard:
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [
❑Yes .❑No ❑NA [
Structure 5 " Structure 6
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance/improvement? '
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
1VE
NE
E
NE
NE
NE
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
I5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NE
❑ NAINE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes
El No
❑ NANE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
El
❑ NANE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
❑ No
El NA
Reviewer/inspector Name k ;f; � � � 5it..o r ,; V' ; t r w�� xsn-� Fu �, ,s hh,
,.,.a . r - �..: •. �5+ �.ae+,< �S �--�'�C`rc�5�w xh-A1'sr?'r','+1� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

b.
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
R_ e4uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the approprrate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
[I Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [I Soil Analysis [I Waste Transfers El Annual Certific tioi
❑ Rainfall El Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections El Weather Cod
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ , E
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
A`dlclttinn'al Cotnmetits an Draivfngs: _ ,. ;,c ,' r yY `,. ;
12128104

Facility Number
I© Division of Water Quality 4
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit ® C fiance I ection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routlne 40 Co plaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Tine: o`ia'i A, I Departure Time: a6. - • County: Region:
Farm Name: �.!' _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: _._ __. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: �.
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: _ ff Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: _ - _ Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = 0 0 g = gg Longitude: = o = 6 ❑ ��
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Design Current, Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
_ JEJ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capaelty Population
❑
Dai Cow
77
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA U NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
[--]Yes [:]No ❑ NA INE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
12128104 Contin

Facility Number; — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA G
El Yes El No ❑NA [
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA G
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
maintenance/improvement?
t. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate lvlanure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Fy R
a
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
E
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name T `' "� ' , • : •`st; ,'=
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records_& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps p El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certi cation
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather C de
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and feport the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E NE
qu
�ddttionalCtiinmst>ts,andlarDrawings
12128104

no
MRO Incident/ Complaint R ort
Received By
Date Received
Time Received a Ipm
County
Complaint Type
.Incident # (RIMS, RUST, ETC)
no
no
Pr
esponsibl Pa y: mp inag
^�JCr) do
Responsibl Par Addrkss 1 Phone:
can IC k. �j 1 fJ 4G5 1 1 a
Investigator
Contact Date
Investigated Date
Response. Date
Investigated? _yes _
Directions to Site:
Actions Taken/Comments:
Referred to:
UST LO ZAP
PW County HD
Referred on: /42d,07
Referred by: ,�r���.�,
C laina t Ad re s 1 Ph no:
ax'vy
c — Z500
(JA "b&AC) a, — Q'co
fin d
SWP Haz. Waste Solid Waste
d I0)
y4e,

FaMityNumber rZ3 -•-�
0 Division of Water Quality . I
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation �j
0 Other Agency J
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4&Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: i Arrival Time: Departure Time: :� .County: _ G Region:
Farm Name: C Ca T K Lek � f­7 Owner Email: _
Owner Name: Q! Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: _ _�1i` `/
Certified Operator: C'!�L� 1� r
Back-up Operator: _
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:-� l7
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: e =1 Longitude: ° i ❑
41
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Other
❑ Other
Design Cu
Wet Poultry Capacity Popr
Layer
Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turke s
Turk e Poults
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the. conveyance man-made?
Design Current
n Cattle Capacity PP n
2�iry Cow
Eitbairy Calf
�r0
ai Hcifei
t
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the'discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ElNE
ElYes ElNo ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: :;t3— a iFS1 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Strucurr 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 fracture 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity or any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do anv of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �NoNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes/LN�o ❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement? 4s
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yc❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift pplication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) at✓ Cj�d�� VV
14. Do the receiving cro s differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, ❑ Yes �3o ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o Ell NA ❑ NE
':,
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equ:2Per? ^ Yes o NA ❑ NE
�:!��i`C.t�'•,7f� �C�l-t`.:,,Sc�r.�:�.rY�: Z.��C _4".-.1i�a. Sd3. a.'; "+uv.r��i3'. .f- ��''Y:.v x4�Xd:�.il G'. .�:��. �.,.'"�ki �i.A fr'l�i-ki�`it� �hr^ Lr. :+r .,+.' '�� ,.4i iT'.�/ i:
1Z
ReviewerlInspectorName Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
w
12128104 Continued

_p �•T
tr Facility Number: Z,�—� Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of CAWMP re ily available? If yes -heck ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
UP ecklists esign aps ther
21. Does record k ing need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ W e Application ly Freeboard�OMLisnute
te A alysis Soil Analysis aste Transf Annual Certification
ainfalI Stocking ❑ field Inspections Monthly and l" Rain InspectionWeather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were hig� o a]?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of ether enc situ tions as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over appltca i n)
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes X0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes D N`o_j�< ❑ NE
❑ Yes�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes to❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes X. ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ' 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Ad`iiltinnal Cornmeuts and/or Drawings:
12128104

Irrigation Calibration
Subject: Irrigation Calibration
From: Cindy Safrit <cindy. safrit@ncmail. net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:56:49 -0400
To: Joseph Hudyncia <Joseph. Hudyncia@ncmail. net>, James Bealle <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail]
James/Joe,
Mr. Kevin Bridges from Cleveland Co. contacted me last week with a question
concerning irrigation calibration. His farm has experience some hardship this fall
with the unexpected death of his farming partner in a house fire. This has put
Kevin in a bind for getting things done on the farm. Mr. Bridges is planning to
contract The Southers Boys to empty the pond this fall, so he will not be using his
irrigation. I told Kevin that he does not need to calibrate his irrigation system
until he uses the system again. I also, advised Kevin to get a calibration from the
Southers Boys for their tank, and to check his hydrants to make sure they are all in
working order. If either of you have any addition comments to add Kevins' cell
phone is 704-477-2237. Thanks and have a good weekend.
Cindy
Kevin,
If you need help with calibration this spring you can reach me on my cell phone
704-754-0566.
Cindy Safrit,PE - Cindy.SSafrit0ncmail.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment &Natural Resources
Div. of Soil & water Conservation
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 of 1 10/2/2008 5:48 PM

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 230008 Facility Status: 6ctive Permit: AWC.230008 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComoliancpInspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Bgutine _ _ County: Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 06/21/2007 Entry Time:04:30 PM Exit Time: 05:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bridges a Cook Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Jerry S Cook Phone: [phone]_
Mailing Address: 3529 Ken McEntire Rd _ _ Lawn -dale NC 280909672
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"24;3Q" _ Longitude: 81°37'48
From the intersection of Hwy 182 8 SR 1363 (Ken Mc Entire Rd.), travel south aproximately 1/2 mile on Ken Mc Entire Rd. Farm is on
the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charles K Bridges Operator Certification Number: 21568
Secondary OIC(s):
Ort-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Charles K. Bridges Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Charles K. Bridges Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beaile Phone: C7°y7�c35'�6�.
Inspector Signature: Date: J�y�ztd
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
12/11/06 > Waste Analysis > N = (1)3 0 (2)0.56 Lbs11000 Gal#ons
09/13/06 > Waste Analysis > N = (1)2.6 (2)0.51 Lbs/1000 Gallons
02/04/07 > Soil Analysis
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC230008 Owner . Facility: Jerry S Cook Facility Number: 230008
inspection Date: M2112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 130 113
Total Design Capacity: 130
Total SSLW: 182,000
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freoboard
k1ste Pond PUSHOFF WSP 19.00 48.00
k-1-1te Pond RUNOFF WSP
Page: 2

Permit: AVVC230008 Owner - Facility: Jerry S Cook Facility Number: 230008
Inspection Date: 06/2112007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ® n n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n 0 Q
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) no 0 o
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
M
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
s
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
®D
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
®❑
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
®
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
®
n
Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
®
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
®
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
®n
n
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
®
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overfoad? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC230008 Owner - Facility: Jerry S Cook
Facility Numbor : 230008
Inspection Date: 06/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yos No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total P2O5?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Sofl Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soit Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
®n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0
®
❑
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
®❑
Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
0
®
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
®
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

' Permit: AWC230008 Owner - Facility: Jerry S Cook Facility Number : 230008
Inspection Date: 06/2112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
Q
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
®n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
®
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
®
❑
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
®
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
Is
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
®
n
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
®
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
®
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Cl
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

w
Permit: AWC230008 Owner - Facility: Jerry S Cook Facility Number: 230008
Inspection Rate: 08121l2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did ReviewedInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

MM
G �Mom
,: _A4
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow 'up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denlid Access
Date of Visit: 11VZ1,144 I Arrival Time: � Departure Time: County _ Region:
Farm Name: t- SOwner Email:
r
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: qP_d V-1 Integrator:
Certified Operator: lid (/(yI. a'L•r ' Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: - Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =e dd Longitude: =e id
Desrgn�
L '�V } ..� > k i9 1d t.i
�, ..:� 1 d 14.,t� 'k Y . T3i "Y� -
F\"y�.,
t
^Current � w- ck Design p, Current .Design , Currents .
1 v .. w
,Y
t
Swine x!Cppacity
1.4"._
u '3.
Populafion Wet Poultry C�piicity Population 'uzCapack Pop'ulation
tCattle- ,
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
=s, ❑ Wean to Feeder
` ❑ Non -La et
❑ Feeder to Finish
"� 4 _ xs
y
❑ Farrow to Wean
,�z
':_
Dry Poultry rWt ;
❑ Farrow to Feeder
.6,
Y ❑ Farrow to Finish
. ❑Gilts
s ❑ Boatrs
14
❑ Other
� �
ref kNumber of Structures '.
- �, irL�. Oi-+. .�-,-, .•Na F. a a ,r. .is.
... i� � 1 �rsr � -�� c.i' c �, - _
❑ Layers
❑Non -La Non -Layers
[] Pullets
❑ Turkeys
El Turkey Poults
El Dairy Cow c'7
Dai Calf
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dar
❑ Beef Stocker
❑'Beef Feeder
El Beef Brood Cow
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

74 Facility Number: — Date of inspection C�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ N1'
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): %Z _ `� 2 r ^
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�U No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
,,,,yy
kNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
50 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�9 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
JZZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
t4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
El Yes
4ANo
[INA [INE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[vt o
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[]
Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
ElNA [INE
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
PlNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

t _
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
1
Reguired_Records & Documents
19.^Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Cl Yes 1WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes -jj�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4S�qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
99NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
J�ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
O NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
0 Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an.odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
-31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
RjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
'�}„�ti ��"8�1t ir�s3Y4. DES' 4''. iii. a "V+ f Y Vv," h' G^-'. Z t
Additional Comments and/or Drawingsfi!'� �p "�z;:�x°;�
12128104
12128104

(Type of Visit )D Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit J& Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time. '% Departure Time: County: Region: Meo
Farm Name: e� Ca-oF fV/4_i`IZ f Owner Email:
Owner Name: Z�fM'y � , +� her k! 'AtL) Phone:
i► / 1
MailingAddress:.3S�% tn/ �C,N#+C_ �Q [.,AwA►�i�/� a✓c 9ri07d
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 0�7 Title: Phone No.
Onsite Representative: ��+� �n �g Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = 0 =' 0 " Longitude: = o =' =
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
1 ❑ Layer
_ 1! ❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Points
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
Dairy Cow
p
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures: ='
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes JA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
50 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 'S —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes RNo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: WAA Awy _
Spillway?: �$S
Designed Freeboard (in): 6
Observed Freeboard (in): 1
El NA ❑NE
El NA ❑NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
®'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
2INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. 1s there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[] Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
19 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to gaestion #) Expiain,any�YESianswerswand/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Us drawingPaclli�better explainrsitfiii s {use'7uddttional pages as necessary
L.�.�..
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: =46g Date: �� }]. D.,'f
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — egf Date of Inspection s
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes CRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes '4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21, Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
EX NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
0 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[@ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
P9 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [29 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1♦f 4._4.
"Additional} t✓OtllmeritS i111Ii�Ut hDraWlll�3 q 'q,
� 3 �s. §
Vdy/o S A) /. 4 o. y y
12128104

AL'l
r q1 r`Divys�on of Water Quality
`` Q Il7ivislon of Soil and Water Canserva6on
-. .<• . �„ .Other Agency
Type of Visit$(•Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit )&Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: �I '0"1►'o Time:
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
,Permitted M Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............•...•••...•
FarmName: 4.-.Jcevk......R�I�.......................................................... County:..C'/ !ir' ........................... ......... »..........
OwnerName: R1'.`...................... ....�jlJ!M�ie3...1.ZStr....................... Phone No:......................................................................................
Mailing Address: „3�J ..... s^ ........................................... ....",^b RlC...............;:2c ........ ... e L........
Facility Contact: .............................Title:.. Q++�++•c�O�u+►�✓t................. Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ............. !f......................_............................................I................... Integrator:.....................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
E) Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a 4 " Longitude 0 • 4 "
, 9 r
Destiga Current Design Current �' : Des�ga .,.. Current.'_
F
n
Ca aci `" 060ulatfon"
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ ....
; eful Yelaion°a
.ai Ca acPo elaton:
LayeDairy 11 0 gir
❑ Non -Layer: ❑ Non -Dairy
t ❑
Other
YT&A Design.Capac>Ity I3 0
Nutn L er of agoons
t3 u -
lid, Transi
Discharges & Stream llimpacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ID No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaurnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes © No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes © No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes © No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes E] No
Structure I 'Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Idcntifler: -Q�t ...... ...... 1l�AJ� ....... ................................................................................................................................... ....... ...........................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 _ Continued

r
acility Number: -- 8 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ®No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes © No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes El No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes © No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes © No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ©No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
.Commeats�{refer to question,,#) F.xplsun any YES answers and/or any.recommendatons orany other rnmiients..
'.Uw swings of facilitygto3better explain situations' {use'edditiatyal pages as necessary): ° Field Copy _❑ Final Notes
.45, k z .a r- ..°z .a i 3 a�,.l. ` -•'�i. `
Qeca+�S %�twe� Con.plk.F �►
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 Continued

l
Facility Number: �y3 — 9; Date of Inspection '1- �` -0ti
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

=O� WArfiA ' ..
ic�' Michael F. Easley, Governor ri
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
—! North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 19, 2003
Kevin Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Cooks/Bridges Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage; AWC230008
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Bridges:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May 12,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be properly maintained and all records
were complete. Enclosed please rind a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachment
cc: File
AA
NMENR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
SHONE [phone] Customer Service
=AX [phone] 1 800 623-7748

REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 21-1.0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility oa the registration databuse.
Facility Number.
Farm Name:
Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out ofbusinesslno animals on site
closed out per NRCS standards
- -- be30v�—thtr-tb.Ct5h0id~(l�ss�h.ar<244�xrar�ne�1411-�unzinctisatt]�,JS_�ctscs,_�4_44_shaa�or
30,000-poultry with a liquid animal waste manApment systrni)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, I will be required to
notify and re -register with the Division of Water Quality.
Signature: Date:
Please neon completed form to: DEHNR-DWQ
Wa= Quality section
Conn limce Group
P, 0, Box 29535,
Raleigh, NC 27626.0535
RR-4/97

Division o[ Water Quellty
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation r"
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
IReason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
I 1 Facility Number 23 Dale of 1'islt: oS112/2003 Time:
' 2577,t overational BelowThreshold
❑ Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Daie Last Oper:ucd or ahaye'fhteshold: .__....._....
F:tr•rn Name: 8rldgesA.Cook.A.airy.......................................................... CFrunty: Qgxelaud ............................... Mid........
Oweer \ante: �LeCly_S.J.CbaricsCDnk./_Bxullgrs_------.___.-._.-.-- Phone :Nei: 79.4:53E:7jj12.-----------------------------
\lailing .address: 52,9.. �d.lYLc.FlxtArtr.ttAuti............................................................... tern.dads....NC.......................................................
FacilityConlact:...........................................................'I'ille:............................................... Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: l{,LYJN.BRlt2GFSE-------------------------------- Integrator':.------------------------------- ------- --
CertifiedOperatr►t':CtlAdikS.K�........................... Br.ijjr.0 ...........
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:22,5!t$.............................
From the intersection of Hwy 182 & SR 1363 (Ken Me Entire Rd.), travel south aproximately 1/2 mile on Ken ,Me Entire Rd.
Farm is on the left.
❑ Swino ❑ Poultry ® Cattle []Horse Latttudc 35 • Z4 36 Longiluder 81 • 37 J8
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
IN Dairy
1 145 98
❑ Feeder to Finish
10Non-Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
145
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
203,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons [ c,� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps u ❑ ,No Liquid Waste NIanagement System
Disch:tr�es & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge ori��inated ar. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance roan -made:' ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. It'discharue is observed. did it reach %Pater ofthe State'' (II'yes. notify IaWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated Ilow in ual/min'.'
d. Does discharge bypass it lagoon system'.' I Il'yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
NVaste C'oilection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I SLructui-e 2 Stntcture - Structiu-c 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldenti liar: .............
Freeboard (inches): 26
nein.inr r,...:.....r

vJI'/J/V 1
• 4!/!!1 /!lNCfl y
Facility Number: 23-8 Dale of inspection 05112,20 073 (�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste A milicalion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records _& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Cl Yes ® No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
•.t+n�p. �w.�"..•e..._S_i...�Y'��. ••i}.4�! sn.t J,K.... .. 7'."d,C^ Y. �':�aYY.,r"^rrt�^! yte.,ui}.i3SY�'ef7�.•'fi-"Y444:'�-l�i."!•.RL�,Y'^4i1�'Y•W.d+r • t
C-°,a eats.( er�to�ju4oa#a:xpl,gny $ a rsaadla�,a_y� ad o ;� ; N
Use gs p ty , - �g�plaE�a itustioaz;; use' ddition'• ri�q�Rsl:❑Field Copy ❑Final Nates `
FACILITY IN GOOD SHAPE.
OWNER CONTEMPLATING GOING BELOW THE 100 HEAD THRESHOLD.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan Johsop
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l Cy';y-try_ c,� ��^ Date: %

W A rF Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North h Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 24, 2004
Jerry S. Cook / Charles Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale NC 28090-9672
1,1 MA71 , ^I IGf =C
DEC 15 2004
�SVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
... �., "ROUNDI-iATIDR S,.CTIOiV
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC230008
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Cleveland County
Dear Jerry S. Cook 1 Charles Bridges:
In accordance with your application received on November 18, 2004, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jerry S. Cook / Charles Bridges, authorizing the operation of
the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC
Number AWC230008 which expired October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Bridges & Cook Dairy, located in Cleveland County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 130 dairy cows, 15 heifers, and 30 calves, and the application to
land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring, conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: ht1p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal opportunllylAf irmative Action Employer —50°% Recyded110°% Post Consumer Paper
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
N��rcnCarol i na
A114tra!!y

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at 715-6698.
Sincerely,
(!
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Cleveland County Health Department
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC230008
APS Central Files

�OF W ArFgQ Michael F. Easley, Govemor
�0 G William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
r? North Carolina []apartment of Envir �Vattuurral Resources
� uF
ty
r A- OFRC
March 28, 2003
I
CERTIFIED MAIL f E 3 �003
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jerry S. Cook and Charles Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale NC 28090-9672
Attn: Jerry Cook & Charles Bridges
Subject: Application No. AWC230008
Additional Information Request
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Cleveland County
Dear Jerry Cook & Charles Bridges:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. 'Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 27, 2003:
This office currently has a waste utilization plan (WUP) for this facility that is dated 511011999 and is written for 130
milk cows and 15 heifers. An amended certification submitted later shows the facility actually has 130 milk cons, 15
heifers, and 30 calves. The waste from all the animals should be accounted for in the WUP. Please verify that the same
WUP is being followed on this farm and, if so, have the necessary changes made to the WUP to correctly reflect the
number of certified animals on the WUP and have the corrected pages signed by both the owner and technical specialist.
If you have modified the WUP since then, please submit a cop), of most recent WUP that reflects correct number of
animals, crops grown, field utilized and has field maps with acreage clearly marked on the maps.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before April 27, 2003 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in
accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Sincerely,
C(
J. R. J shi
Soil Sol
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
Internet http:Hh2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
DENR Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
R_ET1 RECEIPT REQUESTED
T-e fiarles Cook I Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale NC 28090-9672
Farm Number: 23 - 8
Dear Jerry S. I Charles Cook / Bridges:
/ 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Bridges & Cook Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
ncerely,
7;2 4L
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Offce.(w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Jerry S. / Charles Cook / Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale NC 28090-9672
AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
'JOORESI'Ll.E RFGN;IIAL OFFt(Michael F. Easley, Governor
r '�4V William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Nbflh Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
AAI 14 2003 Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
; Division of water Quality
January 13, i�R$� QUA 11S
EM
+� Facility Number 23 - 8
Subject: Public Meetings for Draft Renewal of State Non -Discharge Animal Waste Operation General
Permits
Dear Producer:
Your animal waste management facility is scheduled to be issued coverage under the Animal Waste
Operation General Permits in the near future. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently
in the process of renewing the Animal Waste Operation General Permits and is scheduled to have the
permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for
coverage under the reissued permit.
The Division has published a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of
the draft animal waste operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext. 574
The Division will be conducting public meetings regarding these renewed permits. The following is a
list of dates, times, and locations of the public meetings:
February 3, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Kenansville — James Sprunt Community College
February 4, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Williamston — Martin Community College (Bldg. 2 Auditorium)
February 6, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Iredell -- Iredell County Center
Further information can be obtained by reviewing the Fact Sheet available at the website and address
listed above.
Cc: zMo reo svilie-RegionakOfflce,_Division oof-Vllater CFUality
Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Application File 23 - 8
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
NCDENR
Internet http-./fh2o.enr.no.state.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

o> WATF
`off qQG Michael F. Easley
Governor
c William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 10, 2002
Kevin Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Cooks/Bridges Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC230008
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Bridges:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 9,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be properly maintained; and the records
were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
AM
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
1 800 623-7748 Fax [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access +I
Date of Visit: 4/9/M2 Time:
FFacility Number 23 8
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
[] Permitted ■ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Bridges.&.C.Qok.IDairy.............................................................................. County: ClexdauW................... ..................... 5MQ...........
Owner Name: dr,i'.xY.,S,,.I..Cltars.............. Ctt2kj..HrjdgCS........................................ Phone No: 7ft4-538.!7j&j2 ........................................
Mailing Address: 3522.Kern.NleCt jrC.RQUd............................................................... hawadaleAC...................................................... 209k:9.671.
Facility Contact............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: JS,EVIK.BRWGES ................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified 0perator:C(u1es,j........................... Bridga ............................................. Operator Certification Number:215.61 .............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy 182 & SR 1363 (Ken Me Entire Rd.), travel S. 1mi. Farm is on right. +
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • ®1 ®11 Longitude
�'i��,�; `ksxt.• i xw,}., ..�... --"r"sc:�
�`•�_1^ _ t �r rtr:� -_ @SlglltC11I7CIIt.,{DCS](ggnCIIPTedt S.xrSYeri' 3iq.SkDe6lglti LLrrCIIt'
wine �F a� #fa `at i Po tilation' ` tt]ec c�
;S�-'.';;`CetPti ulation`PoWtry•� ,Cea t aci u:)i�o ttlatioa
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer I I I®Dairy I45 102
�'t ❑ Feeder to Finish ° ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non Dairy
'irs"dsi'ni';•ri^Se'+ i�x-,°+;,•:titcrv:;?=w?�4¢'u"1w.iT^d'i1"4`
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish 't`';o�I}esig>at'ar[ty� 145
..� ❑ C'iilts rY,'=�� t ����iZ�: ,��:rS�?a s li"T �
❑ Boars ' ,� ',r`''Q �r [I'otalE.SSL`W5 203,000
Foll
n2 aloss i :y ❑ Subsurface DrainsPresent ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
n❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream mac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ­al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge.
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 90
05103101
Continued

Facdlity Number: 23-8 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (id trees. severe erosion, ❑ yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanceelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ' ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain)
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records _&_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Gel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes' ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
UJIUMvl
[:ont7nued

. terra
ppp� --
FaMty Number: 231 Date of Inspection 4/9CZM12
Odar Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes % No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
.&i
05103101
J

` pF \NATE9 Michael F. Easley
Q Governor
�O G�
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secrelary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CO
O ,•� Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 3, 2002
Kevin Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Operation Review/Compliance
Cook & Bridges, Facility #: 23-8
Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Bridges:
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker' must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
AWA
RM9W
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
Alan D.Johnson/
Environmental Specialist I1
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Q�pF wArF9OG rhael GoE��emo
Uj William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Y Gregory A. Thorpe, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 6, 2001
Kevin Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Cooks/Bridges Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC230008
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Bridges:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 2,
2001. Based on his observation made during the inspection, the facility appeared to be properly
maintained; and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection reports, which
should be self-explanatory
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
ARA
MEW
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gl ason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit (Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit )SrAoutine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or Visit: Time: '6)
..__ ` - 10 Not Operational Q Belo%v Threshold
Permitted [Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or.Above Threshold . ................. -......
Farm Name: ........................�s�� ,; .... ... ! :n-tz i............. Countv:.......... ....`.. L•.� .1 �..... ..I....................
OwnerNamc:........ ..s............. .... ... x...... A. " Phone No: ....................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:......................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address:.... . �1........ 1'eia�....... `1 tQ.. [...c.'.......?C:. ................................. ............
Onsite Representative: I�
� ........_............._... Integrator:
..4.................................. ` r
Certified Operator...... ,,�,:�,..., .t.....' ............... Operator Certification Number
.......................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude �• �• �•� Longitude �' ��•
Design Current
twine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
f-"- I
Total Design Capacity
.Total SSLW
Nurriber•of Lagoons ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
olding Ponds / Solid Traps No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZLNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2: Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EYNo
3•. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ YesA�No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? &Spillway ❑ Yes ET.No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Frccboard(inches). ......... ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Oe/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or -
closure plan? ❑Yes � No
(If anv of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes j No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 4,No
9. Do an}, stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes RNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Yes C;LNo
12. Crap type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes !Q No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ca -No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
q;� No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[�JtNo
17. Are rock outcro,,
Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a waters well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
WNo
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
Q No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
+_No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at -the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
ElYes
Q No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
4 No
26, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1� No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
5�No
01/01/01
Continued

Facility Number: _ Date of Inspection L.J
Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perTnanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Qilo
❑ Yes .E} No
❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about tfiiis visit.
Reviewer/Ins ector Name �' ; - ' i w-�{ .i r , �
p . �,,. a ty,�... s� wa ,.,...,S.�:r�err,..• a—+ s � °!x�z. � �a `k
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� Date.
01/01/01

ACDENk
JAML'S,B. HUNT JR.
GOVCRNOR
-BILL•HOLMAN
SECRETARY
KERR'T.'STEVEN6
:DIRECTOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 14, 2000
Kevin Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Cooks & Bridges, Facility #: 23-8
Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Bridges:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
March 8, 2000. Based on his observations the facility and files appeared to be in good
shaped. As discussed, Mr. Johnson has enclosed a change of ownership form and
designated operator form for you to complete. Please mail the information to the address
located at the bottom of the forms.
Be reminded that the following items must be available for review by the inspector
during the inspection:
• Certification forms and Certificate of Coverage.
• Site diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Waste application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste utilization plan, tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
It is suggested that this he maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency action plan which must be posted.
• Insect, odor control, and mortality checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a
Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 26115
cc: File PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% PDST-CONSUMER PAPER

0 Division of Soil and Water. Conservation Operation Review 4f;
D Division of Soiland Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection t `F
0 DiviAon'of Water Quality =Compliance Inspection
w 0 Other:' , v a Agency Operation°Re��ew
Q Routine Q Complaint Q FnIlow-up of DIVQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 2— if —
Time of Inspection Ei=24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:...........(10..O.ICS........A.......... .tr c..d�...0.................................. County:...........-1.`G.s. mrt.....................................
OwnerName:......... SC 9 .1� eQo ��................................................................. Phone No:......., ....-...�.R.12.................................
Facility Contact:.f?:.�r.l..l� �r�.`�. s......Title:...... ...... Phone No:..3...'...L.�[..�...
MailingAddress: , e V 1 ` '�� r
....3......�.`...........K....... a.........M..........,....................................L.1................................... ........ ..
OnsiteRepresentative:............A� .i,?.t.s .,.............. !C.�.�1 ��.......................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator r
pIM..LYh.............. :...... .t...f. ........................... Operator Certificatinn Number:..... •L-..5% ...........
ocation of Farm:
.. ... .. ...... ..
=1 =if Longitude =• =' =11
Design Current Design Current Design ' Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle -�Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gifts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ENo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (II' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Npillway ❑ Yes 10No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............4.1.............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: --� Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes kNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an \\
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (BNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,�j No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level \
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes MNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN El Yes No
12. Crop type d ; e.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes EqNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 4!§,,No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes po No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes .No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes qNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Q.No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes P.No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [:]Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes JD —No'
o yiolafioris'or deficiencies ti... noted during t1�is;visit::. . . ...receive Rio further
6 res�6fidence.'about: this visit .
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or An y recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
J • ' :J O...>+ 7 J W ¢'
^E: _. Y c $�F4 �' �`") Y eY i-j 1
K @s�-.�✓ 6'AS \ b 0 k
fly (' 6 �..-�'a, t �
VV\' i �5 11..L `t
4d�
C_ C_
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
n
t Date: �'

r Facility Number: -- Date of Iuspection 0
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes A.No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes IkNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes Q No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 6 fvo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes *<O
itionaAddl',Comments an or 15r4wingsl
A..

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Jerry S. / Charles Cook / Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale NC 28090-9672
Dear Jerry S. / Charles Cook / Bridges:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 23-8
Cleveland County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
NCDEN.R DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 29, 1999
JAMES B. HUNT JR.. Jerry Cook
GOVERNOR
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
.VVAYNE iocr)EVITT , Cooks & Bridges, Facility #: 23-8
!SECRETARY "f, .•' g °
Cleveland County, NC
{} ; Dear Mr. Cool:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
January 28, 1999. The facility appeared to be in good shape. However, you need to
4n ., ensure that all the necessary forms are available for the inspector's review at the time of
inspection. Also you need to complete the animal mortality and insect control checklists
�'^ • . _",_. located in your farm plan. Finally, you must apply the animal waste only to those crops,
and at the recommended rate, listed in the certified farm plan.
1 yy�` i wir,
5 Regarding the irrigation system installation, should it appear that the deadline will
not be met, you need to notify Mr. Shannon Langley of our Raleigh office. He may be
contacted by phone at [phone], ext. 58I, or at P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC
27626-0535.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
1 E Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
" :fi' .•1. ` ; Sincerely,
,- cc
D, Rex Gleason, P. E. -
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FA% 704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review.
[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation, - Compliance Inspection
;.
vision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
outine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follokv-up of DSIVC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
'1'[nu: of Inspection 2.4'hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted [] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operate ..........................
Farm Name: ...!t-�..dSJ>L'S..... �?o.� .��.r..... County:............4.��Pr:.�r�a!L..............,....................
Owner Numc:.........!+'1�.......,..�. ......!%f,?.5?.J.................................................... Phone No: .................... y7..�..�., Z.............................
FacilityContact: .......................C, .l.� ........... 1'itle:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ...,.:rr�..-.j....1..,,... .?—.r ......M..C.I"M........k.................... .. ... 1rf....................................... aZ....... j.,0.
Onsite Rcpresentative:...... -t comet..... .......... Integrator:..... ..................................
Certified Operator: ......... a' kcr.-Ir's.................�,S.e-s........................... Operator Certification Number:... �.C� C 2z...........
Location of Farm:
r....................................................... .......... .............
r
Latitude 0 r �' �:+ Longitude L _J • �' C�i°
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 10 Dairy I jj%) I/
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I❑ Subsurface Drains Present Ij❑ Lagoon Area I❑'spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
it. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. [I'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin':
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
1 Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I rStrUCtUrc. 2 Structure a
ldcmifier: �lgrr� Riff 11__
freeboard (inches): 1 v? F�
D............. .rAo..5...r.k►�.........................................
1 /C199
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
9No
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ Yes , Q140
Structure 4 Structure 5 Struc:ture G
..............................................................................................................
Confinued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
rare there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
• seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes KNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes E No
8. Does any pare of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes W No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes %No
Waste Aanlicution
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? / ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen El Yes , No
12. Crop type ... .C?.t Y�.. f..,,�f1h. c.�.l.... i"k? r.►1.......................................... ...........................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [-]Yes A No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint) ❑ Yes ZNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑ Yes �WNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 9No
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes VNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes 1,Q No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes ElNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes RNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ElYes KNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freehoard problems, over application) ❑ Yes qNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes XNo
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes WO
1PNO..
vi intions:on deficiencies .were noted ri[iring.tfiis.visit:. I'oti wiyl.receivE ncr feirtlier
eQ Ct sparidehee'about'this visit: .: . . . . . .... . . .. . .. . . . ... . . . . .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):,
Cor i � 0141 C��
r tt CeL 10&A <Tr� Vic,1OK X�t2St-.,11 r0'1 �ec jr "ZI e, .Z— Z 7'1
toe 111cbte. CzCIr �G - r�ltYteta �1�4i L'O4h��z11Or'1 O� 1IiYt�L[ [rVI) /NS�T�/Q�/ �,
we,54c_ aW,'e a✓A Y-e-e0r-,4 nr aNa��/Sf5 t I►ttiuvW�u OrV� Ce .RG�
Jer: tLe,�ra.'\ v���'4 T� toe-/ JCepT aT` Cy ~Q-A �
�y ci►1� t h'S'�G� C �1 ` C t C�1 5�$ nee. L� CJ 'C� CGtY1� li .
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 1'7 V 9 , L 11/6/99

DENR
JAME6 B. HUNT.IR.ar
NORTH CAROL,INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 19, 1998
Hazel Sigmon
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Site Inspection
Al Cook & Sons, Facility #: 23-8
Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Sigmon :
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan andbr have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 20115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -SOS RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPZR

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General -Recommendations for Nitro en A ication for Cgmmon Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 Ibs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 kbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

r' y
Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
piMucer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Cleveland SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely, _ Q
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
rl Water Quality Regional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
1'M'F_KWA
a
A&;�
Own" 000%
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/TURAL RESOURCES
October 12, 1998
Attn: Jerry S. Cook and Charles Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale, NC 28090
Dear Messrs Cook and Bridges:
N.C. D-VT. Qg
OCT 14 1998
U.kwl fT T'I ""'s�fYr1IT
La'iaf U OFFICE
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 23-8
Cleveland County
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howar , T, E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc Mooresville -Regional Office w/attachments
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District w/attachments
Facility File w/attachments
Central Files w/attachments
Shannon Langley w/attachments
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CLEVELAND
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 23-8
JERRY S. COOK AND CHARLES BRIDGES
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Jerry S. Cook and Charles Bridges, hereinafter
referred to as "OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and
hereinafter referred to as the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H ,0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

f Farm Number: 23-8
Special Agreement
Page 2
Y (b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER'S" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

' Farm Number: 23-8
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Bridges & Cook
`,
Print Name
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
jroo—Chairman of the Commiss'
jab,;,�-
inf�tink�

r�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
i
I
VIVA
1 Live •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANc> NATURAL RESOURCES
N.C. OMIT W
"i'YTiL(]i MENT. NgA=elft
• NAT MAL Its"0MCM
OAR 5 1998
4MlF wmmm wvr
lamm(IMM M0
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number a3
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
ec
5 �yc2�
fs Qv
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT ,
(D;FORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): Jerry S. Cook and Charles Bridges
2. Facility No.: 23-8
3. Facility Name: Bridges and Cook Dairy _
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Jerry S. Cook
5. Mailing Address: 3529 Ken McEntire Road
City:- Lawndale State: NC Zip: 28090
Telephone No.: (704.) 538-712
6. County where facility is located: Cleveland
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): Cattle_ (Dairy_}
8. Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who -makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1,997.. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their. local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These .
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested, assistance from their local Soil R. Water Conservation District
May 24, 1996
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 1 of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist ,
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
See Attachment
ti
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

Bridges and Cook Dairy
Application for Special Agreement, DENR - DWQ
CES = Cooperative Extension Service Personnel
NRCS = Natural Resources Conservation Service Personnel
SWCD = -Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District Personnel
11. 2. A
12/17/93 Met with CES personnel about farm waste management
registration. Plan to merge with Jerry Cook at year's
end.
02/24/94 Met with CES about animal waste plan information.
03/28/95 Discussed farm plan with CES. She encouraged that we
contact SWCD/NRCS.
08/23/95 Met with CES about waste plan.
06/12/96 Met with CES about SWCD developing waste plan.
07/17/96 Discussed options for animal waste management with
SWCD/NRCS.
07/18/96 SWCD/NRCS discussed options for animal waste management
again. They will return to do survey for better cost
estimates for different options.
07/23/96 SWCD/NRCS surveyed feedlot and barns. Checked soils
for possible waste pond,
08/08/96 More surveying of dairy layout and lot completed by
SWCD/NRCS.
08/15/96 More.surveying and measuring done by NRCS. Waste
management system options discussed with NRCS. Decided
to push all manure into waste pond.
08/20/96 SWCD/NRCS checked elevations and preliminary layout of
waste storage'pond in field.
08/2i/96 NRCS bored and bagged some soil at different depths for
further evaluation.
09/03/96
NRCS discussed options for waste management system.
Will study options and get back in touch.
01/07/97
Met with CES to inform her about waste plan
certification progress.
01/13/97
SWCD/NRCS talked about waste management system. Want -
something finalized soon.
04/15/97
Discussed options again with NRCS. Want everything in
one waste pond or separate solids in one waste pond and
runoff in another Waste pond.
04/17/97
Met with NRCS and discussed waste management system.
Decided to catch all waste in storage pond and,
irrigating waste to field.

04/22/97 SWCD/NRCS did survey to supplement previous layout and
topo survey for waste management system.
04/29/97 Spoke briefly with SWCD/NRCS and set time to go over
waste management system.
05/16/97 Reviewed NC Ag Cost Share Program (NCACSP) contract
with SWCD/NRCS. Plan is for waste management system.
05/20, 05/22 Charles Bridges attended Animal Waste Operator -
Training.
06/97 Charles Bridges took and passed test.
06/06/97 Met with CES explaining that we were working with
SWCD/NRCS in possibly building waste storage pond and
irrigating.
07/97 Kevin and Amy Bridges attended Animal Waste Operator
Training.
47/02/97 Received NCACSP contract for waste management system
from SWCD.
08/20/97 Called SWCD/NRCS office to see if contract under NCACSP
(for waste management.system) was approved.
09/97 Kevin Bridges took and passed test.
09/23/97 SWCD/NRCS personnel checked on progress. Waiting on
grading contractor to look at site. Irrigation
specialist has looked at site.
10/14/97 Met with CES about farm plan progress.
11/04/97 SWCD/NRCS checked to see if grading contractor had been
to look at site.
11/20/97 Irrigation information requested from SWCD/NRCS by
irrigation specialist.
12/97 Amy Bridges took and passed test.
01/21/98 Grading contractor came and look at site and will give
estimate soon. Received preliminary cost for
irrigation system. SWCD/NRCS was informed of this.

II.',2. B
,b4/*/97 Waste Management System Plan approved including
Operation and Maintenance Plan, Emergency Action
Plan, Odor and Insect Control Checklists, and
Mortality Management Methods.
04/30/97 Waste Utilization Plan.
05/16/97 NC Ag Cost Share Program contract
5% 6/97 NCACSP contract signed (all components for waste
management system included in contract).
II. 2. D No funds expended to date.
II. 2. E. None - waiting on contractor.
II. 2. F Not applicable.
II.. 2. G Have not started grading due to extremely wet
conditions and contractor work schedule. The
Soil and Water Conservation office checks
on progress often, approximately twice a month.
Have had numerous contacts with grading contractor
and irrigation specialist.
Charles Bridges, Kevin Bridges, and Amy Bridges
have all taken waste operator training and have
passed test.
II

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION: `
Please Iist each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Grading to be completed including 2 waste storage ponds, diversions
& stock trail - June 15 1998
1YI Concrete, fencing, stone installation to be completed - June_30, 1998
Seeding of grass to be completed -August 1, 1998
DI Irrigation system installed - August 1, 1998
Applicant's Certification:
I, Jerry S. Cook _ , attest this application for a Special Agreement -
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
kno«-ledae. I understand if all required harts of this application are not completed and if all
this facility is found to be -ineligible to enter into a special aareeme t with the -ENIC nothinag
this document renio�rrt re pon�-ibility and liability forcomplving with all North Carolina
General Statutes and Rec.,ulatign5, I understand that t e failure to meet any dates that are agreed
upon by myself and the E—MC will result in_an ropriate enforcement_ actions being taken by the
ELIC.
Lumy
Print Name of f5wner
JAA�!� Date4r D —
Si ature of -ner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

Reguired Items:
One (1) original and two (2) copies o{the comp eted and appro.pri'atelyexecuted
a-p lication form, along with an), attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORMMG
E•NFOR-MATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWLNG ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON•DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCENIENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
i
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 4 of 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
•. ' and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary_.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P,E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd
Lawndale NC 28090
Dear Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges:
A Tk?WA
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DepwrtAp:NT of
EMARONMENT AND NAruRAL,RESOURCM ( r
July 17, 1998
,JUL 20 1998
i�,I OF r,
FT. ,...ta',Ff 41
„
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Bridges& Cook
Facility Number: 23-8
Cleveland County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on February 23, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Jerry S. & Charles
Cook & Bridges in order to allow additional time for Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges to
obtain and implement a certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject
facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 57] or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
a���7 �. � W
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CLEVELAND
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 23-8
JERRY S. & CHARLES COOK & BRIDGES
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges, hereinafter
referred to as "OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and
hereinafter referred to as the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H ,0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER' is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph I (a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 23-8
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(l)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 23-8
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Bridges & Cook
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges
3529 Ken McEntire Rd
Lawndale NC, 28090
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1998
Dear Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges:
`k,Lc
Rf-L;S
SEP I C 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Bridges & Cook
Facility Number: 23-8
Cleveland County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on February 23, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Jerry S. & Charles
Cook & Bridges in order to allow additional time for Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges to
obtain and implement a certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject
facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-053S Telephone 919-733-SO93 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
1N4R'O-Regional, Office
Dewey Botts— Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMNIISSION
COUNTY OF CLEVELAND
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 23-8
JERRY S. & CHARLES COOK &. BRIDGES
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges, hereinafter
referred to as "OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and
hereinafter referred to as the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 23-8
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written -demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 23-8
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Bridges & Cook
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

L
®TWA
11
+�/ +•M
�Iw�►
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
Jerry Cook
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
��
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTME T OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 25, 1998
WAYNE MCDEVIrr Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
SECRETARY Site Inspection Report
Cooks & Bridges, Facility ##: 23-8
- Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Cook:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June
.. "1,, 23, 1998. Every effort must be made to implement your certified farm plan. Be sure to
document any conversations you may have with contractors and other persons concerning
the implementation of the plan. Also, it is advised to include in your waste utilization
- plan, any fields or crops you may use for the application of waste.
The stockpiled manure at your facility should be applied as soon as possible.
Also as discussed, all records should be maintained at the facility. Please submit to this
I
Office a copy of your waste application (form SLD 2) records by July 14, 1998. Please
send the form to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
E - If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
F :� Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
"` Fs 1 £ Sincerely,
cc:
R;".-,......-'".� fib'' , ,{'y'• - �tM-'�'
..,_
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cleveland SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

►� �' M [3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency
1 Division of Water Quality> e
.;. s,. <.
Routine 0-Complaint 0 Follow-u 'of DAV ins ection 0 Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
'Registered [3 Certified ' 0 Applied for Permit [] Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:... ......................
L g Ce..(r{�
Farm Name: Gi.:C?..k- �.5.......'X... �..r.:.S..�j..� �.�. ... County:..... ... ....................................
OwnerName: ....... :......... .. t� ,!- ........,......co.-01................................................. Phone No•...........,..........................................................................
FacilityContact �1L Title Phone No
........�.?t rf .. Co�' 0lc_ ................... j� I � 3....� -.7...g..�.. ...
Mailing Address:...,1.;K Z.9.............. .........4..............t.--
Onsite Representative:...................................................... Integrator:...............................................................
r!
Certified Operator ;,,,..0 ( -!._ }.............. . ........................... Operator Certification Number;......................
�!i�......VJ
` ...........�}.
.....
.. L:. ....A..... .........
................
.. 9t�.....id...l�..�r.h..
;
.J1.�.i....
t
--`f ,r.r.�i.e. �,........ A :�i.......................... . ! .....Y1n.s .�............. � .r..t!1�
....>arL........i.....
n +
'............ P-ri....... l[........ .............................. .
Latitude 3(,, i" Longitude I T1 I• L37 I` 15`o I46
D
Swine ' Ca
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
�w
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
of Laeoons / I
Current Design Current Design Current
Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population w
❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total.Design Capacity:, ! 2C,
Total SSLW i7t vu�
Ponds E
J 10 Subsurface Drains Present jl❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
,.
No Liquid Waste Management System „}
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
kYes ❑ No
KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes )qNo
❑ Yes ,M No
❑ Yes >0 No
❑ Yes 6No
❑ Yes No
R] Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ,jMONo
Continued oln back

Facility Dumber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑•Yes No
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.) ✓k
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes fir] No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................... ........
Freeboard0:.........N.A............ ... ................................. :.......... ................... ..... ............. ............................... ............................ ................................. ...
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes '�No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ✓� No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
A
Waste Application fl
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
$kNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
r
15. Crop type ......... ld.;i/\........ 51..�10:75;1._..1...............'1112:!...................................
..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
g No
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
PLkNo
18, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
19. Is there a lack of available.waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative`:'
❑ Yes,
�E:j No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
KYes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onlyj�
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
tdNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No.violations or deficiencies. were- noted during this: visit.- Moil mill receive no further
Oeresp6bdehce Ahkit this. visit:
Comments {refer fa Iquestion #) Explain anyjYES answers andlor any recotttmendattons or any;other continents <
Ilse draw>4ngs of facility taubefter explain situahons.'(use additional pages as;necessarv)
r / " 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name �;>< _; "�;` ' �� -< � �.�..�>����zp��•• .��� .�. � �°`�F
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G� Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
,lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED
Jerry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges
Bridges & Cook
3529 Ken McEntire Rd
Lawndale NC 28090
Dear .ferry S. & Charles Cook & Bridges:
1 � •
Won
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
!v_C FI�. OF
February 11, l998
. r. !f ,,st eic
FEB 1[7 J998
iflYmn ar [9y,_ .�T,,♦F� .�{C.,ii
.:.iLr'f iLtL ll"t,:WfflU MICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Bridges & Cook
Facility Number: 23-8
Cleveland County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2N .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in. operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 211.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File -- Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Caroiina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 5, 1998
Hazel Sigmon
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Operator -in -Charge Certification
NCGS 90A-47.2
Al Cook & Sons, Facility #: 23-8
Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Sigmon :
As of January 1, 1998 all facilities must have a certified Operator -In -Charge. A review of
the database does not show this to be the case for your facility. Failure to have a Certified Operator -
in -Charge is a violation ofNCGS 90A-47.2.
If you or the designated operator for the facility have not taken and passed the required exam,
an interim certified operator should be obtained. If you have already taken the exam, you may want
to contact Ms. Cindy Dudley of the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification
Commision (WPCSOCC) at 919-733-0026.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Cleveland SWCD
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Main Street, Nil
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 - 50°o recycled/10°b ooc-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water.Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
Jerry S. Cook
3529 Ken Macketire Road
Lawndale NC 28090
Dear Mr. Cook:
4
�Jp
UEHNF4
N.C. DU-1. OF
YL,N iR[)NNiEN'rHEALT3i,
.t NATURAL RM)UR('?'S
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
NOV 10 1997
31VIZ!l gF HIVIRMUTAE VADA&=PERT
MR UTILtE 1901Ai BFFFU
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely,
)", I'X-4'�
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/beth/animalwaste/tempcertfollowup

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p = H N R
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Hazel Sigmon
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Al Cook & Sons, Facility #: 23-8
Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Sigmon :
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pondAagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm, A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, N%4)CAn
FAX [phone]Mooresville, North Caroline 28115 Equal Opportunity/Afirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 W% recyc!ed/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
PIease note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D.. ex' Mo . L�.''' J-"�
Water Quali egional Supervisor
cc: Cleveland SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
GJ

-i�a ��'a'ii • rrp+ .4 �a'L71 it �: iy�• _ •I� �;�nr�X nm2Sr�n�rJ�
xog 'O'd
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Hazel Sigmon
Al Cook & Sons
3529 Ken McEntire Rd
Lawndale NC 28090
Dear Ms. Sigmon:
r A
CDEHNR
N.C. DI?FT. Oe
LNWRONh41 NT. HEAL'Pl '
✓9 NATURAL RI~SOURCES
DEC 17 1996
ONI$I(fN tiF C;iti''^HIt+, ;i"! 'r";SC:'111T,
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation MOSMILE Kai-�14 iuR=1
Facility: Al Cook & Sons
Facility ID #: 23-8
Cleveland County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment proces(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996,
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Ns HA40
a u
Walt e I n oar
O perato on
P,O. Box 29 6-0535
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder U0WJ10yG 'Jeppel 'M aAG�S
AiojeJoeS `sAMOH 'g UD #DUOr
Jouaeno!D •'Jj''}unH 13 s9wDr
a T ArdL,' tV

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Jerry Cook
3529 Ken McEntire Rd.
Lawndale, NC 28090
Dear Mr. Cook:
�ML)
6"LAA
1:3EHHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 12, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Bridges & Cook Dairy, Facility #:23-8
Cleveland County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on June 11, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this
Office. A reminder, the farm plan being developed must be in place by December 31, 1997.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Cleveland County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, Nvy� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

toutine 0 Cam laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ��� 24 hr. (bh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status:
Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review L.
Certified ❑ Permitted
or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
......_.... ..... .................... ....... ............... ..`...... . _........ .... » ..............
FarmName: ................ . •......... dh..................
..................... ........ County:..... g[`2clG\ej................... .......... ..........
Land Owner Name:.. a ' f lG1�%....�... .....-..� ?
.`C! e9. Phone No:..._..5 3 ;.r...... ...-.............. .»..... _...
y-.
FacilityConctact:........� ......i QF�............................
T��itle:................................................ Phhonet No:..........................................................
Mailing Address:.......23T-2 ...........k.:�Y.........� �.0
a �1�f1 ...E . f 2 � ..... . ...............
Onsite Representative: .............. ..............L............................................... Integrator:.....................................................................................
Certified Operator:.......,) 1�AT..................... .�.t.,�!�................. ........ ....... .... Operator Certification Number:........................................
Location of Farm:
i`� .. c�r�......0. �.......
_... ��.r., 3..........�. i? .....
4
t� . ► ...... ..t�.! !.....A.....Q..�? p1CpK..........-1...,r17,.c........
tAX. . - n...... �� ............................................................................
8
Latitude �•Q`« Longitude �• ��«
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Designer Current Design Current r' Design ' Current
Swine,,,, „..,Ca aci ..,Po "ul"anon 1?ou�try ,.. Gg aci Po "lation a Cattle Ge'aci Po nlatiori
(] Wean to Feeder ( La er a'
El Feeder to Finish J ❑ Non -Layer d ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Y e r ``S�Tota1 DesignCapactty
Farrow to Finish " ' .€t k 4 e$
0 =Tata1 SSLW E
Other ,
,
3<Number of Lagpons'/ Holdiitg Ponds., w {` ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
F:,
[Lagoon Area Spray Field Area`
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5, Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
0Yes ❑ No
IQ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes CkNo
❑ Yes ANo
Continued on back

Facility Number:... Z .......... .....-
6, Is facility noti n compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
� No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
[2CNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
Z No
,truc(ilres (I pggons and/or Holding Ponds) 1&0
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Freeboard. (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
It. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waite A,palication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State,, notify DWQ)
ZZA
15. Crop e .................. ........ ............. zk ..S%ats....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
JR:No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
IR
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
J No
' `RNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[:]Yes
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
$Q No
For
Certifigd Facilities Only 41114
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24,
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer t6 question'#):: Explainyany YES'answers and/or.any-recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pages as necessary}
vL-&1 ✓1 i 5 -, (L T� rO CO�5 o� �O e' e \
V1� C v�}�'-}��e cA �
t,ajjG 5ke
� �+��nS
q vt) ya'✓N f / Ll e.re�
reds CLk'rb 14-1
.mv-C-3c poknj Ck �ac; `4y
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: r. I ,
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Sectiod,Pacility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

A Michael F. Easley, Governor
NC DEPT. OF WVWW9N fs'�r., Secretary
North Carolina Depar i�iRSMLLEftRjES� Cftrd! Resources
��E � ^ . I ., Director
ion ofyy tiler Quality
May 30, 2003 V'. IJUN 0 4 2003
Jerry Cook & Charles Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale NC 28090-9672
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC230008
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Cleveland County
Dear Jerry Cook & Charles Bridges:
In accordance with your application received on June 30; 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Jerry S. Cook and Charles Bridges, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal
waste from the Bridges & Cook Dairy Farm, located in Cleveland County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than annual average of 130 Dairy Cows, 15 Heifers, and 30.Calves, and the application to Iand as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the
required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future
samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will
need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to, comply with all applicable laws,
rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this
permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation
to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any
wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the
CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through
143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General
Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.no.state.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]M
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the
Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for
an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a
request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is. located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
6MEo sville-Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Cleveland County Health Department
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC230008
NDPU Files

Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District
844 Wallace Grove Road Phone: [phone]
Shelby, NC 28150-9213 Fax: [phone]
FACSIMILE TRANSMiTAL
Date: October 19, 1999 Number of Pages: 2
To: J. R. Joshi
Division of Water Quality
From: Ben Robinson
District Conservationist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Subject: Calculations for PAN - Bridges and Cook Dairy.
An amended certification number will be submitted to include 1 day
old to 400 lb. calves.

Bridges & Cook Dairy
Cleveland County
Facility Number 23-8
Explanation of PAN calculations - Waste Management Plan VI. a.
by Sam Bingham, NRCS Engineer
130 milk cows - 65 Holsteins, 55 Guernsey, 10 Jersey
Equivalent to 115 Holsteins weight
NRCS Waste Utilization Standard 633
Page 633-18
N: 115 cows x .29 ac. inch per year x 50%. confinement x 611 lbs. total N per ac
x .40 coefficient = 4,075 Ibs. PAN
15 - 1,000 lb. heifers x .2 ac in per year x 50 % confinement x 611 lbs total N
per ac. in x .40 coefficient = 367 lbs. PAN
Total PAN = 4,442 lbs. PAN
P20s: 115 x .29 x .50 x 379 x .70 = 4,4241bs. PAP205
15 x .20 x .50 x 379 x .70 = 398 lbs.
4,822
K20 : 115 x .29 x .50 x 573 x .70 = 6,688 lbs. PAK20
15 x .20 x .50 x 573 x .70 = 602
7,290 **
** Please make change to figure in plan - 8,052 lbs. PAK20 is incorrect.
Use 7,290.

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number 23-8 Facility Name Bridges & Cook DaiKy
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for 145 Date of. Certification �12/22/98
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking -dry cows 130
Heifers �15
Calves 3Q
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL ANIMAL NUMBER 175 **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
The Waste Management System and Waste Utilization plan is based on
175 cows - 130 milk cows.(65 holsteins, 55 guernseys, and 10 jerseys),
15 1,000 lb. heifers, and 30 calves. All other heifers are removed from
the fart, The milk cows and large heifers spend 50% of the time on the
lot. The 30 calves are confined to bares, sheds, and lots near the
milking parlor. The mant.tre fran the milk cows and large heifers while
on the lot is secaped into 2 waste storage ponds and irrigated. Lot
runoff is also collected in the waste storage ponds. Manure from the
calves is collected periodically and applied with a solids spreader..
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animah was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at thisfacility has been evaluated for
the maximum.number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature .S Date Je rZ p
r
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature
Date
Technical Specialist r� �j�
Signature Date /O ZZ QCi
Phone Number (70f) IM- 0ZS 6'

Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District
844 Wallace Grove Road
Shelby, NC 28150-9213
[phone], Ext. 3
Fax: [phone]
June 6, 2000
TO: J. R. Joshi
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch/Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
FROM: Ben Robinson
District Conservationist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
844 Wallace Grove Road
Shelby, NC 28150
Enclosed is the information you requested concerning the animal waste plans for Bridges and Cook
Dairy (23-8) and Hamrick Brothers, Inc. (23-13)
Bridges and Cook Dairy: The PAN for the calves is included in the Waste Management Plan and
Waste Utilization Plan. Sam Bingham in the WMP referred to the calves as "young heifers"
but are technically calves. See calculations.
Hamrick Brothers, Inc.: The calculations for the PAN for this operation are shown. The Waste
Utilization Plan for this operation has been revised to match the calculated PAN. Please
place the maps from the WUP that was provided earlier with this revision.
If there are any questions, please let me know.
it

Bridges and Cook Dairy — Cleveland County
Facility 23-8
PAN Calculations
30 calves — day old to 400 lbs.
average 150 lbs. (more smaller than larger calves)
From NRCS 633-9
3.5 gallons manure and urine per head per day for 350 lbs. average calf
For 150 lbs. average calf use 1.5 gallons/hd/day
1.5 x 30 calves x 365 days x 75% collection = 12,319 gallons
12,319— 7.48 gallons/cu. ft. = 1,647 cu. ft.
From NRCS 633-9: 62 lbs. manure per cu. ft.
1,647 x 62 = 102,114 lbs. = 51 tons manure
PAN = 4.3 lbs./ton
51 x 4.3 = 219 lbs. PAN
219 lbs. PAN included as "other manure around the farm" in Waste Management System
write-up and as "broadcast solid waste" in Waste Utilization Plan.

t N
PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: JERRY COOK AND CHARLES BRIDGES
BRIDGES & COOK DAIRY
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 130 MILK HERD
COUNTY: CLEVELAND
PLANNED BY: Ben Robinson, Distract Conservationist
Scott Miller, District Technician
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
Mac Edgerton, Civil Engineer Technician
APPROVED BY: C
L"'-
DATE: Z6-

INDEX
I. Waste Management Problems
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
B. Heifer Housing
C. Clean Water Exclusion
D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
E. Waste Utilization
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
S. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
G. Waste Volume
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping System
b. Nutrient Balance
C. Disposal Calendar
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan

Appendix
Waste Storage Ponds Cost Estimate
Irrigation System Cost Estimate
North Carolina Archaeological Site Form
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Aerial Photo
Emergency Action Plan, 3 sheets
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Waste Management Facility Site Evaluation
Soil Investigation to Determine Suitability of Proposed Pond
Site
Drainage Area
Earth Fill & Excavation Quantities
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Irrigation System Design Parameters, 6 pages
Specification for Construction of Ponds and Reservoirs
Vegetation Specification
Treatment of Critical Erosion Areas with Permanent Ground
cover
Fencing for Livestock Exclusion
Fabric Filter Cloth
Construction Specification, Concrete
Operation and Maintenance Plan (by Field Office)
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Drawings
Plan View
1
of 5
Concrete Chute for Water
2
of 5
Concrete Chute for Manure
3
of 5
Details Sheet
4
of 5
Safety Rail
5
of 5

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Management Problems
130 cows are milked on the Bridges -Cook farm. Milking
parlor wash water and polluted runoff.are uncontrolled.
Manure is presently scraped and hauled about once a week.
15 heifers are also kept on the lot. Dry cows are
counted in the milk cow number. Milk cows have free access
to a lounging area. The night lounging area is mostly bare
ground next to a ditch.
rcgNCs)
Day old to 200 lb heifers are confined to barns, sheds
and lots near the milking parlor. All other heifers are
removed from the farm.
II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Ponds for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
Waste storage ponds will be located near the feedlot
and freestall barn. Waste from the milk herd, dry cows and
large heifers will be collected in the waste storage ponds.
The waste storage pond volume (storage period) is the main
factor which determines the management required to prevent
an illegal discharge. Manure should not be applied to land
that is frozen, snow covered, or saturated.
Irrigation will be used to empty the slurry pond. A
small pond will be constructed next to slurry pond to store
lot runoff to flush the irrigation system.
B. Heifer Housing
All weaned heifers will be removed from the farm.
C. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping and guttering will be used where practical.
Guttering will mostly be used on any new buildings.

D. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Livestock are fenced out of the waste storage pond.
Fencing will be changed to create 100 ft. vegetative filters
below lounging area. The filters will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
A stock trail shall be constructed from feedlot -
freestall area to pasture. A heavy use area will be
constructed at entrance of lot at lounging area.
E. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

III. waste Storage Ponds for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1.
Normal Runoff
for 180 day
period
Use average runoff values
in Ag.
Waste
Management Field
Manual for Cleveland County.
Drainage Area
= 40,741 sq
ft Surface =
31,113 sq ft
Unsurface
= 9,628 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH RAINFALL
% DEPTH
%
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN_
3.89
53 2.06
20
0.78
1.3
FEB.
4.18
57 2.38
25
1.05
1.4
MAR.
4.69
57 2.67
24
1.13
3.1
APR.
3.51
59 2.07
26
0.91
3.6
MAY
3.99
58 2.31
24
0.96
4.3
JUN.
3.93
60 2.36
27
1.06
5.0
JUL.
4.82
60 2.89
27
1.30
5.0
AUG.
4.46
61 2.72
31
1.38
4.2
SEP.
3.42
67 2.29
33
1.13
3.4
OCT.
3.48
62 2.16
30
1.04
2.4
NOV.
3.15
59 1.86
26
0.82
1.7
DEC.
3.90
59 2.30
24
0.94
1.6
47.42
28.07
12.50
37.0
Try 6 months:
Oct. - March Surface Runoff Depth = 13.43"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.76"
Surface Runoff= 13.43" * 31,113 sq ft= 34,820 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.76 * 9,628 sq ft = 4,621 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surfaces
23.3 - 11.5 = 11.8" = 1.0 ft/6 month
3.. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 6.0
Runoff = 5.4111
25yr-24hr runoff= 5.41" * 40,741 sq ft = 18,367 cuft
12"/ft

4.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 6.0" = .5 ft
5.
Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.0
ft
6.
Waste Volume
a. Cows
65 Holsteins C 1,400 lbs
55 Guernseys Q 1,100 lbs
10 Jerseys ® 900 lbs
Equivalent to 115 Holsteins @ 1,400 lbs
It
is estimated that 50% of the manure will be
collected on
the
feedlot and freestall area.
Volume
= 115 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 180 days *
50%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 19,372 cu ft
b. Large Heifers
15 large heifers spend 5026 of the time on
the lot.
Volume
= 15 heifers * 10 gal./day/cow * 180 days
*.500
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 1,805 cu ft
C. Total Volume
= 19,372 cu ft + 1,805 cu ft = 21,177 cu ft
7.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water
100 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water
150 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water
300 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water
50 cfal.Zday
500 gal./day
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
= 12,032 cu ft

B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
34,820
cu
ft,
2.
Unsurface Runoff
4,621
cu
ft�`
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
18,367
cu
ft
4.
Manure
21,177
cu
ft,,
S.
Wash water
12,032
cu
ft•`
TOTAL
91,017
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
1.0
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5 ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.0 ft
TOTAL
2.5ft
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
Two ponds will be required. A small pond will be used
to store water to flush irrigation system. 8.5' of depth
will be used. A pipe will be install to divert other water
to slurry pond after flush pond fills up.
Flush pond dimensions, Bottom - 30' X 30'
SS - 2 :1
Top - 74' X 74'
Depth to top - 11.0'
Depth to drain pipe - 8.5'
Normal storage volume =
8.51/6[30'X30' + 64' X 64' + 4* 47' X 47']
19,595 cu ft
Second pond will require an additional storage of
91,017 - 19,595 = 71,422 cu ft
2:
119' X 119,
75' X 75'
Volume = 8.5/6[ 751* 751+ 109' * 109' + 4(92' * 921)]
= 72,763 cu ft
This is OK.
2.1:1

Normal Pump Out Volume = �q,6:7
34,820 + 4,621 + 21,177 + 12,032 +1.0 *(119 * 119+ 74 X74)
= 92,287 cu ft per 6 months
= 184,574 cu ft per year
1,380,000 gal per year
= 50.8 ac-in per year
Flush Pond = 39,190 cu ft/year or 293,141 gal/yr
or 10.8 ac-in per year
Slurry Pond = 145,384 cu ft/year or 1,086,859 gal/yr
or 40.0 ac-in per year
Maximum pond levels
0.5' + 1.0' + 18,367 cu ft/(66' * 66' + 110' X 1101)
= 2.6' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 2.6 below the top of each dam. The emergency
spillway elevation is planned 1.0 foot below the top of dam
elevation.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot area. The District Conservationist
will design all diversions. Diversions shall be designed to
carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store_
some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.

V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter areas
The stock trails and heavy use areas consist of 9" of
compacted ABC stone over a specified type of filter cloth.
Runoff from the lounging area will be directed across well
maintained grass sod. Vegetated filters shall be maintained
between lounging areas and drainage ways. Filters shall be
100 ft wide. Swells or diversions shall be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to kick water into filters at
frequent intervals.
A. Milk Cows
Milk Cows have access to lounging area located behind
the freestall barns. vegetative filters at least 100' wide
will be maintained around the lounging areas.
B. Day old to..400 lb Heifer Group (calves)
(calves)
30 young heifers are kept in hutches and sheds near the
milking herd. Approximately 7516 of the manure is collected.
Manure will be collected and spread as needed.
Volume
of manure=30 calves*1.5 a1 hd da * 365 days*.75= 1,647 cuft
7.48 gal/cu ft

VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for milking herd, dry cows and large heifers
will be stored in a waste storage ponds for approximately 6
months and will be irrigated.
During the course of one year, the ponds will store
50.8 ac-in per year of waste. Daily scraping of waste is
required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at
other parts of the farm:
1. Day old to 400 lb Heifers (calves) 1,647 cu ft
If all of one years waste were spread using a 200 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 8 loads. Assuming 1
load per hour, it will take 8 hours to spread this manure.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off from the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from the lounging area will be diverted through
100' vegetative filter areas. Grass sods will be maintained
all year round. These areas maybe controlled grazed in late
spring and early fall when ground is dry. Weeds may require
chemical control or periodic bush hogging. See plan map.
C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Waste Storage Pond
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 11,104 lbs. 0.40 4,442 lbs.
P205 6,889 lbs. 0.70 4,822 lbs.
K20 11,503 lbs. 0.70 &, 959 lbs. 7R40 jbs
111 lbs PAN per ac-in
or 4.1 lbs per 1000 gal
Nutrients in flush pond not include in this calculation.
Nutrient content will be low in the flush pond.

b. other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL NUTRIENTS
DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 510 lbs.
0.43 219 lbs.
P205 316 lbs.
0.70 221 lbs.
K20 444 lbs.
0.70 311 lbs.
C. Total Available
Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 4,661 lbs
P205 5,043 lbs
K20 8,363 lbs
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
Spreading Schedule
9 months storage on spring corn
for waste storage
3 months storage on small grain
Spreading Schedule
When cropland is available barns
for other manure
will be cleaned out.
CROP UNITS
ACRES YIELD APPLIC. RATE
Corn Silage tons
22 15.0 1.4 ac-in/ac
Small Grain tons
14 2.0 0.7 ac-in/ac
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED
lbs applied/ac (lbs. used/ac)
CROP ACRES
N P205 K20
Corn Silage 22 150 (165)
Small Grain 14 80 (110)
C. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Silage 22 NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Small Gr.14 NNNNN
N = not a recommended disposal period

VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage pond and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond reaches a point 2.6 ft.
below the top of the dam, the storage pond shall be emptied.
A post will be set with its top at this elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be checked
and repaired as required.
l

S
r,
V
"r
7
,}
IC
'�I
U
JYI
,5
lid
ri�
l
PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM �.
OWNER: JERRY COOK AND CHARLES BRIDGES
BRIDGES & COOK DAIRY
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 130 MILK HERD
COUNTY: CLEVELAND
PLANNED BY: Ben Robinson, District Conservationist
Scott Miller, District Technician
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
Mac Ed erton', Civil 1Engineer Technician
APPROVED BY: joC, /--
DATE: 2.5
0

INDEX
I. Waste Management Problems
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
B. Heifer Housing
C. Clean Water Exclusion
D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
E. Waste Utilization
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3_ 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
5. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
G. Waste volume
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts.(polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping System
b. Nutrient Balance
C. Disposal Calendar
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan

Appendix
Waste Storage Ponds Cost Estimate
Irrigation System Cost Estimate
North Carolina Archaeological Site Form
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Aerial, Photo
Emergency Action Plan, 3 sheets
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Waste Management Facility Site Evaluation
Soil Investigation to Determine Suitability of Proposed Pond
Site
Drainage Area
Earth Fill & Excavation Quantities
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Irrigation System Design Parameters, 6 pages
Specification for Construction of Ponds and Reservoirs
Vegetation Specification
Treatment of Critical Erosion Areas with Permanent Ground
cover
Fencing for Livestock Exclusion
Fabric Filter Cloth
Construction Specification, Concrete
Operation and Maintenance Plan (by Field Office)
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Drawings
Plan View
1
of 5
Concrete Chute for Water
2
of 5
Concrete Chute for Manure
3
of 5
Details Sheet
4
of 5
Safety Rail
5
of 5

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Management Problems
130 cows are milked on the Bridges --Cook farm. Milking
parlor wash water and polluted runoff are uncontrolled.
Manure is presently scraped and hauled about once a week.
15 heifers are also kept on the lot. Dry cows are
counted in the milk cow number. Milk cows have free access
to -a lounging area. The night lounging area is mostly bare
ground next to a ditch.
( Cq lucs )
Day old to 200 lb �-ieifers are confined to barns, sheds
and lots near the milking parlor. All other heifers are
removed from the farm.
II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Ponds for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
Waste storage ponds will be located near the feedlot
and freestall barn. Waste from the milk herd, dry cows and
large heifers will be collected in the waste storage ponds.
The waste storage pond volume (storage period) is the main
factor which determines the management required to prevent
an illegal discharge. Manure should not be applied to land
that is frozen, snow covered, or saturated.
Irrigation will, be used to empty the slurry pond. A
small pond will be constructed next to slurry pond to store
lot runoff to flush the irrigation system.
B. Heifer Housing
All weaned heifers will be removed from the farm.
C. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping and guttering will, be used where practical.
Guttering will mostly be used on any new buildings.

D. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Livestock are fenced out of the waste storage pond.
Fencing will be changed to create 100 ft. vegetative filters
below lounging area_ The filters will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
A stock trail shall be constructed from feedlot -
freestall area to pasture. A heavy use area will be
constructed at entrance of lot at lounging area.
E. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

III. Waste Storage Ponds for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Cleveland County.
Drainage Area = 40,741 sq ft Surface = 31,113 sq ft
Unsurface = 9,628 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
%
DEPTH
a
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.89
53
2.06
20
0.78
1.3
FEB.
4.18
57
2.38
25
1.05
1.4
MAR.
4.69
57
2.67
24
1.13
3.1
APR.
3.51
59
2.07
26
0.91
3.6
MAY
3.99
58
2.31
24
0.96
4.3
JUN.
3.93
60
2.36
27
1.06
5.0
JUL.
4.82
60
2.89
27
1.30
5.0
AUG.
4.46
61
2.72
31
1.38
4.2
SEP.
3.42
67
2.29
33
1.13
3.4
OCT.
3.48
62
2.16
30
1.04
2.4
NOV.
3.15
59
1.86
26
0.82
1.7
DEC.
3.90
59
2.30
24
0.94
1.6
47.42
28.07
12.50•
37.0
Try 6 months:
Oct. -- March Surface Runoff Depth = 13.43"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.76"
Surface Runoff= 13.43" * 31,113 sq ft= 34,820 tuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.76 * 9,628 sq ft = 4,621 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surfaces
23.3 - 11.5 = 11.8" = 1.0 ft/6 month
3- 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 6.0
Runoff = 5.4111
25yr-24hr runoff= 5.41" * 40,741 sq ft = 18,367 cuft
12"/ft

4.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 6.011 = .5 ft
5.
Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage
1.0 ft
b.
Waste Volume
a. Cows
55 Holsteins @ 1,400 lbs
55 Guernseys @ 1,100 lbs
10 Jerseys @ 900 lbs
Equivalent to 115 Holsteins @•1,400
lbs
It
is estimated that 50% of the manure will
be collected on
the
feedlot and freestall area.
Volume
= 115 cows * 14 galldayZcow * 180 days
* 50%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 19,372 cu ft
b. Large Heifers
15 large" heifers spend 50% of the time
on the lot.
Volume = 15 heifers * 10�ga lday/cow * 180
days * 500-o
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 1,805 cu ft
C. Total Volume
= 19,372 cu ft + 1,805 cu ft = 21,177
cu ft
7.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water
100 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water
150 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash .water
300 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water
50 aal./dav
500 gal./day
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
= 12,032 cu ft

B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
34,820 cu
ft,
2.
Unsurf ace Runoff
4,621 cu
f t "'
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
18,367 cu
ft
4.
Manure
21,177 cu
ft--
5.
Wash water
12,032 cu
ft•'
TOTAL
91,017 cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond'surface
1.0
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5 ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.0 ft
TOTAL
2 .5 f t
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
Two ponds will be required. A small pond will be used
to store water to flush irrigation system. 8.5' of depth
will be used. A pipe will be install to divert other water
to slurry pond after flush pond fills up.
Flush pond dimensions, Bottom - 30' X 30'
SS - 2:1
Top - 74' X 74'
Depth to top - 11.0'
Depth to drain pipe - 8.5'
Normal storage volume
8.5' /6 [30'X30' -+- 64' X 64' + 4* 47' X 4711
= 19,595 cu ft
Second pond will require an additional storage of
91,017 - 19,595 = 71,422 cu ft
2:
119' X 119'
75' X 75'
Volume = 8.5/6[ 751* 757+ 109' * 109' + 4(92' * 92')]
= 72,763 cu ft
This is OK.
2.1:1

Normal Pump Out Volume = Qg6'y
34,820 + 4,621 + 21,177 + 12,032 +1.0 *(119 * 119+ 74 X74)
92,287 cu ft per 6 months
184,574 cu ft per year
= 1,380,000 gal per year
= 50.8 ac-in per year
Flush Pond = 39,190 cu ft/year or 293,141 gal/yr
or 10.8 ac-in per year
Slurry Pond = 145,384 cu ft/year or 1,086,859 gal/yr
or 40.0 ac-in per year
Maximum pond levels
.0.5' + 1.0' + 18,367 cu ft/(66' * 66' + 110' X 1101)
= 2.6' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 2.6 below the top of each dam. The emergency
spillway elevation is planned 1.0 foot below the top of dam
elevation.
TV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot area. The District Conservationist
will design all diversions. Diversions shall be designed to
carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store
some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.

V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter areas
The stock trails and heavy use areas consist of 9" of
compacted ABC stone over a specified type of filter cloth.
Runoff from the lounging area will be directed across well ;
maintained grass sod. Vegetated filters shall be maintained
between lounging areas and drainage ways. Filters shall be
100 ft wide. Swells or diversions shall be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to kick water into filters at
frequent intervals.
A. Milk Cows
Milk Cows have access to lounging area located behind
the freestall barns. Vegetative filters at least 100' wide
will be maintained around the lounging areas.
B. Day old to-440 lb Heifer Group (calves)
(calves)
30 young heifers are kept in hutches and sheds near the
milking herd. Approximately 75% of the manure is collected.
Manure will be collected and spread as needed.
Volume
of manure=30 calves*1.5 aal/hd/dav* 365 days*.75= 1,647 tuft
7.48 gal/cu ft

VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for milking herd, dry cows and'large heifers
will be stored in a waste storage ponds for approximately 6
months and will be irrigated.
During the course of one year, the ponds will store
50.8 ac-in per year of waste. Daily scraping of waste is
required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at
other parts of the farm:
1. Day old to 400 lb Heifers (calves) 1,647 cu ft
If all of one years waste were spread using a 200 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 8 loads. Assuming 1
load per -hour, it will take 8 hours to spread this manure.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off from the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from the lounging area will be diverted through
100' vegetative filter areas. Grass sods will be maintained
all year round. These areas maybe controlled grazed in late
spring and early fall when ground is dry. Weeds may require
chemical control or periodic bush hogging. See plan map.
C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Waste Storage Pond
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 11,104 lbs. 0.40 4,442 lbs.
P205 6,889 lbs. 0.70 4,822 lbs.
K20 11,503 lbs. 0.70 &.,� lbs. '72gp Jbs
111 lbs PAN per ac--in
or 4.1 lbs per 1000 gal
Nutrients in flush pond not include in this calculation.
Nutrient content will be low in the flush pond.

b. Other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 510 lbs. 0.43 219 lbs.
P205 316 lbs. 0.70 221 lbs.
K20 444 lbs. 0.70 311 lbs.-
C
. Total Available Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 4,661 lbs
P205 5,043 lbs
K20 8,363 lbs
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
Spreading Schedule 9 months storage on spring corn
for waste storage 3 months storage on small grain
Spreading Schedule When cropland is available barns
for other manure will be cleaned out.
CROP UNITS ACRES YIELD APPLIC. RATE
Corn Silage tons 22 15.0 1.4 ac-in/ac
Small Grain tons 14 2.0 0.7 ac-in/ac
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED lbs applied/ac (lbs. used/ac)
CROP ACRES N P205 K20
Corn Silage 22 150 (165)
Small Grain 14 80 (110)
C. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT-NOV DEC
Silage 22 NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Small Gr.14 NNNNN
N = not a recommended disposal period

VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage pond and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond reaches a point 2.6 ft.
below the top of the dam, the storage pond shall be emptied.
A post will be set with its top at this elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be checked
and repaired as required.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
(Revision #5 Updates Plan Approved 06/12/00)
PRODUCER: Jerry Cook & Kevin Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
LOCATION: 3529 Ron McEntire Road
Lawndal.e, NC 28090-9672
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Dairy
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 130 Holstein/Guernsey/Jersey Milk Cows
(Design Capacity) 15 Holstein/Guernsey/Jersey Heifers
30 Calves
STORAGE STRUCTO (s); Waste Storage & Flush Pond
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation & Broadcast
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste must be
analyzed within 60 days of each application cycle. Soil tests shall be done annually so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre
annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface
is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which
is not allowed under Division of Water Quality regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwide odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied
not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 2
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all the fields where waste is applied
shall be monitored and alternative application fields shall be used when these
metals approach excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for broadcasting,
injecting and irrigating waste are not the same.
The waste management 'system which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall be
operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of an
animal waste management system.' The North Carolina Water Quality Commission will provide
training and certification of operators.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of water samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the Water Quality Commission.
AMOUNT of WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, eta.)
Waste Storage & Flush Pond: 690,307 gallons - Irrigated
Scrape & Haul - calves & heifers: 1,647 ft3 (51.tons) - Broadcast
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
Waste Storage & Flush Pond: 4,442 lbs. PAN irrigated liquid waste
+ 219 lbs. PAN broadcast solid waste
4,661 lbs. PAN Total
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and surface application.
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & I
CROP CODE
YIELD
LBS AW N
COMM N
****
* LBS AW
CLASS
PER AC
PER AC
ACRES
N USED
DETERMINING
------
PHASE
APPLY
------
METH.
APPLIC. TIME
965
1A,2A
31B2
CS-1
15
165
0
48.7
8,035 Mar --June
3A
965
1A,2A
31B2
(SOS -I++)
(12)
(120)
(0)
48.7
(5,844 Apr -June)
3A
965
1A,2A
31B2
SGH/S-I
2
40
0
48.7
1,948 Sept --Nov
3A
70
0
3,409 Feb -Mar
965
1B,2B
31B2
CS-B
15
165
0
16.0
2,640 Mar -June
3B
965
1B,2B
31B2
(SOS-B++)
(12)
(120)
(0)
16.0
(1,920 Apr -June)
3B
965
1B,2B
31B2
SGH/S-I
2
40
0
16.0
640 Sept -Nov
3B
70
0
1,120 Feb -Mar
Total
66.6
J 18,315

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 3
I - Irrigated B - Broadcast
* LBS AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
++ Sorghum -Silage may be substituted for Corn -Silage -
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of
North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses nitrogen.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in table 1 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
LBS N PER UNIT
CS
Corn - Silage
Tons
11.0
SGH/S
Small Grain Hay (Oats, Wheat,
Barley, Rye)
(or silage at 6 tons yield/acre)
Tons
55
(18.3)
SOS
Sorghum - Silage
Tons
10.0,
TABLE 1
TOTAL
AMOUNT OF
TOTALS FROM TABLE 1
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
64.7
17,792 **�*
64
17,792 ****
N PRODUCED
** BALANCE
4,661
1713,131
** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the
animal waste N produced.
*** Acres shown in each of the proceeding tables for broadcasting estimates useable
acreage of the field excluding required buffer areas which border residential
areas. Useable acres in the fields may vary slightly from acres shown in the
broadcast tables.
**** This number is based on double cropping corn silage (non -tropical) and small
grain hay on all cropland fields.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 4
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time
of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil
moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids.
The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil
at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the
nitrogen needs of the crop.
if surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the
responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation
system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to
apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this
plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and
amounts.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application hate
Application
(In/Hr)
Amount (In.)
1A, 2A, 3A
31B2
Corn Silage &
0.40
0.60
Small Grain Hay/
Silage
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. in many situations, the
application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation.
The maximum application amount shown can be applied under'optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 months. In no instance should the
volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm
storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader
equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1
and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the
tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance
in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Manure is scraped daily to a waste storage pond. The pond stores approximately 160 days
of manure accumulation. A second pond will
store lot runoff and will be used to flush irrigation system after applying slurry waste.
Waste storage ponds are emptied by irrigation when crop and soil conditions are suitable.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Sail Type:
PAGE 5
31B2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands.
They formed in residuum from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface and a
clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is low.
Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
32C2 - Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands.
They formed in residuum from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer
and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is
low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
36B - Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
These nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, well drained soils are on
uplands. They formed in residuum from felsic rocks. They have a loamy
surface and clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell
potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
5933 - Helena -Worsham complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes
This map unit consists of nearly level to gently sloping Helena soils and
nearly level Worsham soils on toe slopes and head of drainageways. They
formed in residuum from felsic rocks and mafic rocks. Helena soils are deep
and moderately well drained. They have a•loamy surface and clayey subsoil.
Permeability is slow and shrink -swell potential is high. Seasonal high water
table is within 1.5 to 2.5 feet. Worsham soils are very deep and poorly
drained. They have a loamy surface and clayey subsoil. Permeability is slow
to very slow and shrink -swell potential is moderate. Seasonal high water
table is within a depth of 1.0 foot.
9882 - Bethlehem-Pacolet complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
This map unit consists of gently -sloping, eroded Bethlehem soils and Pacolet
soil on uplands. Bethlehem soils are moderately deep and well drained. They
formed in residuum weathered from high-grade metamorphic rock. They have a
loamy surface and clayey subsoil. Permeability.is moderate and shrink -swell
potential is low. Soft (rippable) bedrock is within 20 to 40 inches of the
surface. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet. Pacolet soils are
very deep and well drained. They have a loamy surface and a clayey
subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is low.
Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or
has an agreement for use"of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If
the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the'rate of application for'other nutrients.
9. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10
tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff
leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation
field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation
tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does
not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur off site or to surface waters and in a method which
does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in
order to control odor or flies.
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential
for salt damage from animal waste should also -be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on
soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these
soils should be held to a minimum suitable winter cover crop planted to take up
released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting
of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a
lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an
irrigation ditch or canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities
sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
perennial water. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
19. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
cropland provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways
that discharges directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste
shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc_). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should
be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
is. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19, Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20, Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
For direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct
human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications
of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping
shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be
the rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach
excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained.
Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application for
all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Jerry Cook & Kevin Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm
event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -
site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water' Conservation
District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation or other equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this Waste Utilization Plan. The equipment
must be available at the appropriate time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon,
holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage structure in a 25 year, 24 hour storm
event. I (we) also certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and rates that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: Jerry Cook
(Please print)
Signature: 6Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: Ben Robinson
(Please print)
Affiliation: USDA- NRCS
Address (Agency):
844 Wallace Grove Road
Shelby, NC 28150-9213
Date:
Phone No.: 704/471-0235 Ext. 3
Signature: ?04� _ Date: 4

r/4
.. V
lit
4.0
zo
Al
6

414m
4d
M

A
At .t . I`
0 'I
... �•L�
•1
• r
r • l wf. .
.i.ir•'
�iec
m'
yIR7
. a
r N• •
r.�-sy.:4�
. 361 • •aM
a�• :061
a
Parl
NJ
0
/ t1;![fGliii'
to
1362 ...
/;
..
a
363
; � s
•;
x
, 1F�.
•: 060 Fes;. 1
�,
'''JJJ��`��1 �
1
.� •
yam,
�
�'S ,
�,tr.�f
1. •b O
..J �
�I •
�
`t
•
1
226
ror
Cem
v
'
I
7
d
ifporL
\,
r363
---�000
1351
vc

Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District
844 Wallace Grove Road
Shelby, NC 28150-9213
[phone], Fart- 3
Fax: [phone]
June 6, 2000
TO: J. R. 7oshi
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch/Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
FROM: Ben Robinson ---
District Conservationist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
844 Wallace Grove Road
Shelby, NC 28150
Enclosed is the information you requested concerning the animal waste plans for Bridges and Cook
Dairy (23-8) and Hamrick Brothers, Inc. (23-13)
Bridges and Cook Dairy: The PAN for the calves is included in the Waste Management Plan and
Waste Utilization Plan. Sam Bingham in the WMP referred to the calves as "young heifers"
but are technically calves. See calculations.
Hamrick Brothers, Inc.: The calculations for the PAN for this operation are shown. The Waste
Utilization Plan for this operation has been revised to match the calculated PAN. Please
place the reaps from the WUP that was provided earlier with this revision.
If there are any questions, please let me know.

V
Bridges and Cook Dairy — Cleveland County
Facility 23-8
PAN Calculations
30 calves -- day old to 400 lbs.
average 150 lbs. (more smaller than larger calves)
From NRCS 633-9
3.5 gallons manure and urine per head per day for 350 lbs. average calf
For 150 lbs. average calf use 1.5 gallons/hd/day
1.5 x 30 calves x 365 days x 75% collection = 12,319 gallons
12,319 ; 7.48 gallons/cu. ft. = 1,647 cu. ft.
From NRCS 633-9: 62 lbs. manure per cu. ft.
1,647 x 62 = 102,114 Ibs. = 51 tons manure
PAN = 4.3 lbs./ton
51 x 4.3 = 219 lbs. PAN
219 lbs. PAN included as "other manure around the farm" in Waste Management System
write-up and as "broadcast solid waste" in Waste Utilization Plan.

Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District
844 Wallace Grove Road Phone: [phone]
Shelby, NC 28150-9213 Fax: [phone]
FACSIMILE TRANSMITAL
Date: October 19, 1999 Number of Pages: 2
To: J. R. Joshi
Division of Water Quality
From: Ben Robinson
District Conservationist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Subject: Calculations for PAN - Bridges and Cook Dairy.
An amended certification number will be submitted to include 1'day
old to 400 lb. calves.

Bridges & Cook Dairy
Cleveland County
Facility Number 23-8
Explanation of PAN calculations - Waste Management Plan Vl.a.
by Sam Bingham, NRCS Engineer
130 milk cows - 65 Holsteins, 55 Guernsey, 10 Jersey
Equivalent to 115 Holsteins weight
NRCS Waste Utilization Standard 633
Page 633-18
N: 115 cows x .29 ac. inch per year x 50 % confinement x 611 lbs. total N per ac
x .40 coefficient = 4,075 lbs. PAN
15 - 1,000 lb. heifers x .2 ac in per year x 50 % confinement x 611 lbs total N
per ac. in x .40 coefficient = 367 lbs. PAN
Total PAN = 4,442 lbs. PAN
P20s: 115 x .29 x .50 x 379 x .70 = 4,424 lbs. PAP2O5
15 x .20 x .50 x 379 x .70 = 398 lbs.
4,822
K2O : 115 x .29 x .50 x 573 x .70 = 6,688 lbs. PAK2O
15 x .20 x .50 x 573 x .70 = 602
7,290 **
** Please make change to figure in plan - 8,052 lbs. PAK2O is incorrect.
Use 7,290.

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number 23-8. __,.._ Facility Name Bridges & Cook Dai
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for 145 Date of Certification i 2/22/98
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking -dry cows 130
Heifers 1_
Calves 30
BeefBrood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL AN]MAL NUMBER 175 **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
The Waste Management System and Waste Utilization plan is based on
175 cows - 130 milk cows (6.5 holsteins, 55 guernseys, and 10 jerseys),
15 1, 000 lb. heifers, and 30 calves. All other heifer:; are reinoved from
the farm. The milk cows and large heifers spend 50% of the time on the
lot. The 30 calves are confined to bares, sheds, and lots near the
milking parlor: The manure fron the milk cows and large heifers while
on the lot is scraped into 2 waste storage ponds and irrigated. Lot
runoff is also collected in the waste storage ponds. Manure from the
calves is collected periodic -ally and applied with a solids spreader..
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated far
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature S Date
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature
Date
Technical Specialist �%/�
Signature J H��`� !�R _ Date !4 � ZZ
Phone Number (70tf) S171d23 5—

State of North Carolina �Yn� RwC6/VEG
Department of Division s on of Water Quanvironment and lity al Resources �N '�+C�r}•SF�r10t,�
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 3 01gr
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USERS AN ORIGINAL) Non-Q�s�
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations Top,,,,
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 FacilityName: Bridges &: Cook
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: .terry S. / Charles Cook / Bridges
1.3 Mailing address: 3529 Ken McEntire Road
City, State: Lawndale NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-538-7812
1.4 County where facility is located: Cleveland
Zip: 28090-9672
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): n
OR.....
/From the intersection of Hwy 182 & SR 1363 (Ken Mc Entire Rd.), travel S. — I mi. Farm is on right.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): eels Sati, r- a 5 owner
1.7 Lessee's 1 Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 0 1/0 1/54
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _23 (county number); $ (facility number).
2.2 Operation DescriptEo Cattle operation
miry
145- Certified Design Capacity -
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals T e� of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 23 - 8

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 156.00 ; A ired Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
2.4 Number of lagoons/ - orag pond (circle which is applicable):
J
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or N (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standard etc.) (Swine Only)
Na7��P�'�cAbre YES or (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED I i EMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations; .
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal- Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CA WMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CA WMP must include the following components. Some of these components mat, not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CA WUPfor permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
33A The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
33.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
—tl , S
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 23 - 8

RECEIVED
tivArFR 0' +AL1TySECrrarl
Facility Number: 23 - 8 JUN 3 01499
Facility Name: Bridges & Cook Dairy
Non-Dischara Permitar,�
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
and Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for w �'�p,� ��t/Q 1! _ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me a6d is accurate and complete tot a best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature ���� / � _ 7 Date /-.z Yy
�. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 23 - 8

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number 23-8_ Facility Name Bridges & Cook Dairy
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for 145 Date of Certification 12/22198
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Mincing+dry cows 13Q
Heifers 1.5
Calves . 30
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL ANIMAL NUMBER 175 **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
The Waste Management System and Waste Utilization plan is based on
175 cows - 130 milk cows.(6.5 holsteins, 55 guernseys, and 10 jerseys),
15 1,000 lb. heifers, and 30 calves. A-11 other heifers are removed from
the farm. The milk cows and large heifers spend 503% of the time on the
lot. The 30 calves are confined to bares, sheds, and lots near the
milking parlor. The manure frown the milk cows and large heifers while
on the lot is scraped into 2 waste storage ponds and irrigated. Lot
runoff is -also collected in the waste storage ponds. Manure from the
calves is collected periodically and applied with a solids spreader..
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature A Date 1 e
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature . Date
Technical Specialist
Signature _ . a� _ . Date /O' ZZ ?e1
Phone Number (70y) V71-^ CZS 6'

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1198)
AsbevRk Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodf n Place
Asheville, NC 28801
fszgy 251-6208
Fax (e1s) 251- 452
Avery Macon
Buncombe Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell,
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Header=
Jackson
Yancey
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax (910) 48"707
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Richmond
Cumberland
Robeson
Harnett
Sampson
Bake
Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Streit
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
WQ 771-4600
Fax (33�) 771401
Al cc Rocldngbam
Akleghany Randolph
Ashe Stokes
Caswell Sorry
Davidson Watauga
Davie Wilkes
Forsyth Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
(2S) 946.6481
Fax {tea) 975-3716
Beaufort Jones
Bertie - - Lenoir
Catalan Martin
Cbowan Pamlico
Craven Pasquounk
Curatuck Perquimans
Dare Pitt
Gates Tyrea
Graeae Washington
Hertford Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]M
Alexander
Lincoln
Cabatrus
Mecklenburg
Catawba
Rowan
Cleveland
Stanly
Gaston
iredeU
Union
'Raleigb Regional WQ Supervisor
38M Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Cbatham Nash
Durban - Northampton -
Ed wmmbe orange
Frawain F"son -- _ - -- -
Granville Vance
Halifax Wake
Johnston Warren
Lee Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3645
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Cartem Onslow
Columbus Pander
Duplin
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128199
Page 4 of 4

Animal Waste Nfanagement Plan Certification
(Please tvoe or orint all inforrnachon that [lees not require a s' et
E:Yistin- >: or:: ye�k..:: ar:::�h: Es anded''':`( tease circle: one)' :":r{ °::'
General Information:
Name of Farm: Bridges and Cook DairyilitY No: J$3 -- 8
Owner(s) Name: Jerry S. Cook and Charles Brid es % (�(X -7812.
Mailing Address: 3529 Ken McEntire Road, Lawndale, NC 28090-9672- "'N"ance Eri
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: Cleveland
Latitude and Longitude: 350." 24' !V./ 81° 38' 03" Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): On Ken McEntire Road, 1/4 mile from the
intersection of Highway 22.6 near Polkville, NC. _
Ooeration Description:
Type of Swine No. of:lnirnals
:1 Wean to Feeder
ZI Feeder to Finish
Q Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
7 Boars. .
Type of Poultry ft. of Animals
ZI Laver
7 Pullets
Orher Ttipe of Livestock:
Type of Cattle f%Io. of Animals
X Dairy 145
:1 Beef
.Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application:5. Required Acreage: 19
Number of La,00ns / Storage Ponds: 2 Total Capacity: 92,358 Cubic Feet (ft')
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: ITS or YO (please circle one)
If YES. are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
�*h�a�aaieaNMMcMF���i*�a,N,k**hhx.k�*�M+i.x.Ma.Ma.a.Fi.!.+,,*k�,Fohi.iaka.a�+N�t+ass;+��ada,iiis�,x+�+�a,.�M*?.a.i.xM�e:,.isa.a,kx�.
Owner / Nfana;er Agreement
I (we) verify [hat all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing,. I (%ve) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. i (we) know that anv expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Nlanagemem before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directiv through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the ?3-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. r (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from louneina and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that anv modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted. to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DENI or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner: Jerry S. Cook and Charles Bridges��
Signature: ��,,� S�,f - Date: /si-2 2 -
Name of Nfanager(if different from owner):
Signature: - Date:
.- WC -- August 1. 199 1

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the `forth Carolina Soil and Wate: Conservation Commission pursuant to I;A
NCAC 6F..0007. t ckriltji that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management"'plthat_ meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management ,
(DElrl) as 5pecifie&4n.1 A NCAC 211.0 17 and the USDA-Naturai Resources Conservation Ser%ice (iyitCS) and/or the
North Carolina. Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 13A NCAC Z'_-i.0217 and 15A XCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. TAe following, gIemetgs:aite included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign"each cer_uficat6i (SD, SI, WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only cerd v parts for which they are
technically competent:
II. Certification of Design Bn�s Ca k
A). Collection. S tor -a-
ge. Treatment System
Cited the appropriate bo.,c
-1 Existing facility witht�ut retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: storage capahility consistent widt waste utilization
requirements.
New. e.
Nuanded or retrotttted facility (SD)
.animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C
Affiliation USDA - /YeA I 4s,Lr 6n�y-J-,S JreLlDate Work Comp fed: 7
Address (Agency_): ,A u:z 3 . &,I�L,.� ���N���.� 5t /[u JiprT�+:•� � I�� Phone Na. g �r 7-,g¢j z
Signature: C. Date: a-e, - 98
B) Land Anglication Site )
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste udlizadon; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic •and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please. Print): y�rihddir�sor,.7r•
Mfiliation SA RGS Date Work Completed: 11/36147 7
Address (Agency): 95ff a 119ce (,rout �fc� G SQ Phone `ro. 74y/y)1'a2.i
Siigna.ture: Date:12AZ f
C) Runoff Controls from Ezterjor Lots
Check the appropriate box
..-1 Facility Mthaut exterior is (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
'Ya,/
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by FRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please print): - jar--,t,
: Atttliation Res Date Work Completed: 6 9�
Address . 7-YIs'b Phone -,No.: 7oq q7/ o23�
_ _ —
Siinature: , Date: l a 3z- --
WC -- .august 1. 1997

D). r\ olication and Handling, E ui ment
Check: the appropriate box
J ExjS[LI1; nr rzpandine fnciligy with existing waste 1,2plication_egui0mgM (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been zither field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applicadons has been
established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
e plan).
Few. expand �l. nr exi, wiin; wa to icatinmen t -or snr, irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
;D New. expanded. or existing flci ' v wiLhogg gxiscing w, . li 'nn egMiarnent for l d S r ding n 'tjg
i o0, (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management pian: '(proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates ,tot to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
-,contained as part of the plan). TT
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): cl�
Affiliation-CZ,WI ,'rj2J P9,J K G Date Work- Completed:
Address (Agenc ): '� 7 Phone No.:
Signaiur •56
Date:
E) Odor Conti:oi. Insec troi. Nfortality ytanaaement and Emergency Action Plan W.
:.._ SI. WUP. RC or D The waste management plan for this ' facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Nlanagemem Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan: Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize odors and Best
iv-lanagement Practices to Control Insects have been selected and includedd in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 5o 5. Mi LL
Affiliation- 15LAK0 Syn, 2E 06 5 Date Work Completed: 2S
Address (Aa cy): QJq WAL&ACY E (_ a lab Phone `o.: -cu3 .---
5i1rnature: Date: 1.2/M / ig
F) Rritten Notice of New or ExDandine Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin consrructlan after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (eve) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and ail property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine Farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: _ Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
N C -- Au.-ust 1. 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no cerrification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ �l�ca&,cA f- ae e-(A.Js
Affiliation Date Work` Completed: i Z/Z-.4gS
Address (Agency): 9*t.Cta.( Ue+ l Oc} ZS l Va Phone No.: 7e If /v-yi I e z 3S—
Signature: Date: t 2. /1.2,/9 V
B) Land Application Site (W P)
Check the appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
:.I Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monthldavlyear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
Q Also check. this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):__?. as5f; ih►iH Adi"SOV7 �%r —
A-ffiliation__=A =/Vif 6S Date Work- Completed: /ZA-1Z
Address (Agency): f�Lda Lie (arovc 1W /67y_-,d Z17/0 Phone No.:70�1YL,'a2
Signature:zta!:Date:
This following signature black is onlw to be "used
above has been checked. ..f .
when the box for conditional approval in Ill. B
I (we) ceriify that I (we) have committed to establish the trbpping system as-speciited in my (our) waste udlization plan.
and if appropriate 'to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DELI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days foilo-itig the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEtiI_
Naive of Land Owner:
Signature:_. Date:
Name of ZManager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
ANVC -- August 1. 1997

C) Runorf Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior leas
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ -J Sovn-e cfre:;,
Affiliation N A-C-S Date Work Completed:
Address (Age cy): 3,q4 Wztta.-.,L- GrvuA- R e. (Lit NC Phone yN.: � t a Z3C
Signature: .-r_r_"i Date: /Z/zzLyPO
D} i2alication and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block-
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is o:: site and ready for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained'as part of the plan.
J ,Animal waste application and Handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
justnient guidance Have been provided to the owners and are contained a5 part of the pl;tn.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and h• d ' _ equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by "Z (month/daylvear); there is adequate
storage to bold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan. y
dame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ' V
Affiliation O Date Work Completed: la -'-Al -�J
Address (Agen y): 4 Phone No.:
Signature Datd:_ / .Z ]'
The following M64nat; . bck is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DE:NI a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional ceratication. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DE.M.
Name of Land Owner:_ rc ]% sie- ye.17 (dok
Signature: —
Date: 1.2, -• .4•Z 93
Name of N[anager (it` different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality Manatrement (SD. Si. WUP. RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): LEI�
Affiliation C EL Date Work Completed: a 4
Address (Age cy); LL . vt= Phone No.:
Signature: Date: �a
A%VC -- Au -Must 1. 1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- :august 1. 1997 fi

TECHNICAL SPECIALIST FOR ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
DESIGNATION CATEGORY
CODE
AREA OF AUTHORITY
Collection, Storage,
SD (design)
- lagoons, storage ponds, dry stacks, storage structures,
and/or Treatment
SI (installation)
composters, pushoff ramps, curbing and other similar
structures
Waste Utilization Plan
WUP
- design and installation (development and
implementation) of land application plans
including crop and acreages available to meet nutrient
budget, hydraulic and nutrient loading rates, placement
of application site buffers
- measurement of existing storage volume
- confirmation of existence and compatibility of land
application equipment with waste utilization plan
- certification of cropping systems
- confirmation of absence of exterior lots
- confirmation of sludge and effluent removal and
application at agronomic rates for lagoon closure
Runoff Controls
RC
- design and installation of filter strips, grass
channels, and related bmps used to reduce runoff from
exterior lots (primarily dairy operations)
irrigation Equipment
I
- design and installation of irrigation systems to
include pipe size, pump horsepower, nozzle size, system
layout, thrust blocks, etc. and operation plan to meet
criteria of Waste Utilization Plan (hours per set, ,
etc.)
Technical Specialists are designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F.0005.
Technical Specialists should only certify parts of a plan for which they are technically competent.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
(Revision # 2 Updates Plan Approved 05/10/99)
PRODUCER: Jerry Cook & Charles Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
LOCATION: 3529 Ken McEntire Road
Lawndale, NC 28090-9672
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Dairy
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 130 Holstein/Guernsey/Jersey Milk Cows
(Design Capacity). 15 Holstein/Guernsey/Jersey Heifers
STORAGE STRUCTURE(s): Waste Storage & Flush Pond
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation & Broadcast
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of .
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste must be analyzed within 60 days of each application cycle. Soil
tests shall be done annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced
for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater
than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10
tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips
are established.
4. Do not.apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under
Division of Water Quality regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 2
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and
to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be
applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days
prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all the fields where
waste is applied shall be monitored and alternative application
fields shall be used when these metals approach excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application method shown above. If you
choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan.
Nutrient levels for broadcasting, injecting and irrigating waste are not
the same.
The waste management system which is covered -by this waste utilization
plan shall be operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate as
an operator in charge of an animal waste management system. The North
Carolina Water Quailty Commission will provide training and
certification of operators.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on'typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should
be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management
facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling.
techniques, preparation, and transfer of water samples to the lab for
analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the Water
Quality Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
Waste Storage & Flush Pond: 690,307 gallons - Irrigated
Scrape & Haul - calves & heifers: 1,647 ft3 - Broadcast
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
Waste Storage & Flush Pond: 4,442 lbs. PAN irrigated liquid waste
f219-lbs. PAN broadcast solid waste
4,661 lbs. PAN Total
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be.grown, soil type and surface application.
11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 3
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
***
* LBS
& CLASS
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
DETERMINING
PER AC
AC
USED
PHASE
------
APPLY
APPLIC.
METH.
TIME
965
1A,2A
31B2
CS -I"
15
165
0
48.7
8,035 Mar
3A
May
965
1A,2A
31B2
(SOS-
(12)
(120)
(0)
48.7
(5,844 Apr
3A
I++ )
Jun
965
1A,2A
3132
SGS-I
6
40
0
48.7
1,948 Sep
3A
Oct
70
0
3,409 Feb
Mar
965
1B,2B
31B2
CS-B
15
165
0
16.0
2,640 Mar
3B
May
965
1B,2B
31B2
(SOS-
(12)
(120)
(0)
16.0
(1,920 Apr
3B
B++ )
Jun
965
1B,2B
31B2.
SGS-B
6
40
0
16.0
640 Sep
3B
Oct
70
0
1,120 Feb
Mar
TOTAL
66.6
18,315
I - Irrigated B - Broadcast
* LBS AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
++ Sorghum -Silage may be substituted for Corn -Silage.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be overapplied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers An some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in table 1 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
LBS N
PER UNIT
CS
Corn - Silage
Tons
11.0
SGS
Small Grain - Silage
Wheat/Oats/Barley/Rye
Tons
18.3
SOS
Sorghum - Silage
Tons
10.0

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 4
TABLE 1
TOTAL
AMOUNT OF
**
TOTALS FROM TABLE 1
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
64.7
17,792 ****
64.7
17,792 ****
J PRODUCED
BALANCE
4,661
- 13,131
** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
*** Acres shown in each of the preceeding tables for broadcasting
estimates useable acreage of the field excluding required buffer
areas which border residential areas. Useable acres in the fields
may vary slightly from acres shown in the broadcast tables.
**** This number is based on double cropping corn silage (non -tropical)
and small grain silage on all cropland fields.

WASTE fITILZZATION PLAN
PAGE 5
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application.amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at
the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied
exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to
ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the
acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates
and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a.guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Application
No.
Rate (In/Hr.)
Amount (In.)
1A,2A,3A
31B2
Corn Silage &
0.40
0.50
Small Grain
Silage
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
,assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.

WASTE UTILISATION PLAN
PAGE 5
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of'once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your
structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure
that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct
rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the
recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make
this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Manure is scraped daily to a waste storage pond. The pond stores
approximately 180 days of manure accumulation. A second pond will store
part of the lot runoff to be used to flush irrigation system after
applying slurry. waste.
Waste storage ponds are emptied by irrigation when crop and soil
conditions are suitable.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 7
Soil Type:
31B2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils
are on uplands. They formed in residuum from felsic rocks.
They have a loamy surface and a clayey subsoil.
Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is low.
Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
32C2 - Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded
soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum from felsic
rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey
subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell
potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0
feet.
36B - Appling sandy loam, 1 to.6 percent slopes
These nearly level to gently sloping, very deep, well
drained -soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum from
felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface and clayey subsoil.
Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is low.
Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
59B - Helena-Worsham.complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes
This map unit consists of nearly level to gently sloping
Helena soils and nearly level Worsham soils on toe slopes
and head of drainageways. They formed in residuum from
felsic rocks and mafic rocks. Helena soils are deep and
moderately well drained. They have a loamy surface and
clayey subsoil. Permeability is slow and shrink -swell
potential is high. Seasonal high water table is within 1.5
to 2.5 feet. Worsham soils are very deep and poorly
drained. They have a loamy surface and clayey subsoil.
Permeability is slow to very slow and shrink -swell potential
is moderate. Seasonal high water table is within a depth of
1.0 foot.
98B2 - Bethlehem-Pacolet complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
This map unit consists of gently sloping, eroded Bethlehem
soils and Pacolet soils on uplands. Bethlehem soils are
moderately deep and well drained. They formed in residuum
weathered from -high-grade metamorphic rock.- They have a
loamy surface and clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate
and shrink -swell potential is low. Soft (rippable) bedrock
is within 20 to 40 inches of the surface. Seasonal high
water table is below 6.0 feet. Pacolet soils are very deep
and well drained. They have a loamy surface and a clayey
subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell
potential is low. Seasonal high water table is'below 6.0
feet.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 8
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in -the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which
to properly apply the waste. if the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is
the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update
of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to 'meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available
moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of
management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5
or more tons, but less than 1.0 tons per acre per year providing
grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of
drift from the irrigation field.
&. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina"
for guidance..)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the
site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during*
rainfall events, or when the.surface is frozen..
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 9
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a
swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property
boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an
irrigation ditch or canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393
- Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not -be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed
waterways -that discharges directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16.. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.).
Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other -woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should
be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or
discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be -suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing
a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal
discharge, pollution and erosion.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE 10
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and
spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be
applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all
waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the
liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall
be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc
and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive
levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and
maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five
years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained
for three (3) years. Waste application for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Jerry -Cook & Charles Bridges
Bridges & Cook Dairy
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and
the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved
animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know
that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before.the new animals are stocked. I
(we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed
on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon
request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation or
other equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this Waste
Utilization Plan. The equipment must be available at the appropriate
time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon, holding pond, tank,.
or other unroofed storage structure in a 25 year, 24 hour storm event.
I (we) also certify that the waste will be applied on the land according
to this plan at the appropriate times and rates that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: Jerry Cook
(please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: Ben Robinson
(please print)
Date:
Affiliation: USDA- NRCS Phone No. 704/471-0235 Ext. 3
Address (Agency):
844 Wallace Grove Road
Shelby, NC 28150-9213
Signature: Date: (o" 7- /

I
�'53�,�'k 5 1t �1'I,Y e'V �`, �.t �18�,� � �kgil I yr. sip• //��� ?� .34 3i,"k'1 � Y°J7�5�;;k� Y y�.
k p p
g : I. -a. P i� U t'= ,•fir. eft ,� ra4� F' ._ q 4 y ,�•S
lY i 1 �
q _._ ,ram i F I• e.
a
..- D ay,,,b,, +�:.. �� tlR :9 ,..�.r,. 3' %-�, t•�_ I...�I N �, ' - q, � .. ; 1 I p !
if
q!
o
170
tittle F Q of tY r o
�;
G
lia
a., O gC {.G - '' ?: +�. R' ° r. :.,� ik d! !fey' ,yy• ` In, ^
.% p � IRd 'jy J.^(.iJP � 4 vk .' Yn C,�,��� •Y :_� 4'T: 4 �{
',� 1*. � n?�f44. ��. ° `` rG� �+ tl -,t 'f•,. fi ° V� Si ° i, � L. p-o
.f:)r) 5, +, a. o'-�L ,��"•�idJj " k
a -,y,, `Yt t+Y •'�1 .Y..Jk+w Q.i �j, a oo: r'U < (r a r, { r AIN
0.
44
ilw
40 '.Ye k o a k' �-
p ��� �- Ck. 9F G• � � "fit. , ,t.,
a '''S' y�fi'/� n .r ',Y _ti"l+ �• ;- �! _ "ram 'r :. �':
q�� D7✓ .k•y "H� O
• af' 6'%�h dim 1 .� �'_ 6 .
o e 1� a ��' r> r<• t �� s `a �'�` u
R k Oa o k pg q o iS
l
a �T ������1qq1__yyN � ']]�� i Pd�Q MM r m Rkf`v- yv t k .I�,-"'•�'�..k %�.
: T�1� � j `f 1 ��-iill `f 'f.. :. ♦fir„ , O, yl� T � ,�X 'Ir �ti. �' :;JQ , 1 '
41
14
6 ... � c•o 'i P I :�.�. ��rJ � .. M� �li .i` � � 4j �/Ff �'vt
9.;��
Y�- ' � �' n 1!- ° �:L 1 � D ;s ��ti•j l��.Yy ' ��T�er�� �� � Urra r {L
� a o n �y �a a � � •. - .'i��.��' ���"��}�j�_•75� ill""��i�w rsY .J�'u.�r
"� •v, � 1 .4.4 d
�,xss, �r I,,� ! �(M(' eS'�rr y,�. f� LL+�� K y ra',�✓':,t k�tGrv�e � �.71y. F
'�- k tl 1' ykJ ��R '�k �*Q 1��. L` �,.,� {' .. l'tr�' i�4����br�3- �AS�IF'lJ,. ,{t Icy w.Y�, • 17����. `k,S 4'SJ
' l :,a 1' 1,' 43� rS+ yr � a. a '�' c ✓ti•vv.Y k �-� � � �.s .y -
�O tl��F- sn :�� � .`a 4� wb9 �.3 - ,, r '� r � •'%r � i" 4I�1��' +• r �,,
tW" r sw Y r svr; d 7' t i,

I
K-1
q;,61 3
tl
;;!fk
it

\ � ►ti.� r !M?I�t '` i
_ i .J'. 1'` ��O �
(_,p'p_`\l
i\
1rl
♦ •�
.r'
'+i A'
� ♦
_ +5: - ,
7. -
;ter iai'�, . •�.t•
+ja 1;; •�•�r Va
..s.
,�,
q,^
:j
rl ••
- ,
.-+��
S 1
th?Q?
t
a..•a-
1 +J ,
r „
,
rr � . !
+ 2 4: _{;'• _
.,
' SY4^ •3 ��• � ~i L<
� `a� � a5r
flfi� 1 ' ;
i �' 1 i
y�Ue ;
+ iS
^ r ' �fa'. �1"�
+t• �
El mot'' �► �
� �,
7 '�
r �' `
a
�
j
•�
,.
�- '_ [\-�:�
1
,t. ). n�!
�7 r
� :•
oval l� .� st'
r,Aj' � 4 Z
`� r/
!r u - .we4r'
_
� � I N � w!•
E,�.- •.c, 11\ r. �.
x,
' Zt ■p t. �
." ily
_ „�. it rffi
_... ••i� :r,
�^�I"
.• N
A
:�• ,� �,. � i
1,� ��t
f.t' '��'� _ _ s�"
1 i
�+ 36] ; BM: ,. ,
L'.. �l.s:•' .3
yr- �:.,G � ' ; i �` ,
Y_I-� •4� 1
7 ilea
�P8
•�
¢
,•
;1 � a � +! � Si;
�_ tl
F y,o •I
• 1''.
.i c - K�'�107 �
eF � '{���j,$ �� k�i� '��Hr `.t
,Y �� _.-i" �a#�r �
�
,�
��' {♦
�. ['
d
�r d J ;
I ` _
�+ S•.11k '{�.•� � Ji '4 �`4!5 �,� f _I 4
4�,5�` +f�. s1__`•,. ��^�r�.•� `J� �."
1 �L,.�d �[ •r �'
r �
''k�(�'-.�y..�. K!r
:� t
� .. r r �,
�+ ,
':i.
_
j62 r P
-,n�N`.•
_
•� 4 :
', *
-
{ 'N t.G.
-ae,3:jC:n •
�
�'. . L\.
-
!
� �1 iy � . � _
�rh' 'y�t
-
� ^x� dCE T�� r _�..'
i.
.�"14ci
r'ry1:.,,�1
�
y; ' � ,. c+� '
{��x �'!?,�,
T I
4 ' ik?: ` �"' :'.i'j%,, .,,. q�
'�7
�:✓, ��•GYY'
gp � j`�,
a
� Sa �� r
a 1• � i � S
3�a¢ [fir j.� ti)i'•.
S4' 1 '� n r •
'?-�
.+R,.,
�����
L :../ .'i: 363 �'
,3c�� � tea. y'
�<
fC2
' r `ST`
r�N 1. �i ;s r ',
' � 4 _ �k�� ��
r .�+fZ
, � .r� �. � L.•
J - � ,
..5���
' �.4. t.•' i',i )
� r d� t.•r".A.•.!�" �.
Y i �
at�s.syr
� 1•'TM[
K ry
j
'-.�„s `+w-, a•�'r
a"'r' r1
y�,
'.p
t �
•
`,at
�
W'
r ,� �etl.
y
� .4 a..�,•7:s�'�r�;^
iJ;� :� s. N,'. y�:,a. � I �
�a K�.]a4
�
� 1 '
�'
`<
3s r'Li �
-L +,
-!'
' 1 - % ���.'r
r -k -
�, ,yn.: b r`�'�4t.µ d`-
4aa..e , w - rw�.�'C' �' r�
���'''w���/ff _�,1 ` + 4 ,
� �r •�-�a',,,�.',
;'�
.,�I
s�
f � ••
�,�, ¢
+�!
L, •• � "�✓�.J; Y
�
- ,TFr'r ?C� �j �- Ji � �. .n,f
�
ry�k�i
c5"4`.�I�`a t �?#��,. ! n,y7
� Y-�ti����,,
r
�.�,} , �
q
� Y�a�.
I` •
f-S it T., Q $�
.yj� � F \_N �
��'�'Y-�. /.. a� Ill
-
.� �
,1
•�
� r
r�
t
--.�
' r.
� 'a
'C � 1# _ �'
i l�Sp•. •
J+l, �
ff
I ' I i f
- ��' Si'4A�%4 F
s �l P r
4,
..�
��,'.
.�3,1
+ �t 1' pe ,
- ,F f
L'
Ir 'r r
•tf�•"
�
��
_. 5 e .,
'
��
y.
_ - � S `.•ram.
f � i ` � -
2 Y+
•i ♦e,!
�;� .�. ��; t�
5
4.�
� �{ its .•.'+ ! t.�i'
° .
`.rover
9, "4±'� i
4sA�••' M0, r�
W41 d
ie aa. 4 �,� °`,�� �
�� r� ' 1r �r;
_ r • � �' ��i•.t1�'r;.�
1116
........_ ..... ` oa 4U '4U ..

RECErvEo
WAT�o nr "q ITY,SF;`170tR1
'JON 3
*f"D scnargq P"fty
PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: JERRY COOK AND CHARLES BRIDGES
BRIDGES & COOK DAIRY
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 130 MILK HERD
COUNTY: CLEVELAND
PLANNED BY: Ben Robinson, District Conservationist
Scott Miller, District Technician
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
Mac Edgerton, Civil Engineer Technician
APPROVED BY: C
DATE: zs

INDEX
I. Waste Management Problems
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for -manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
B. Heifer Housing
C. Clean Water Exclusion
D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
E. Waste Utilization
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
5. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
6. Waste Volume
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation -
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping System
b. Nutrient Balance
C. Disposal Calendar
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan

Appendix
Waste Storage Ponds Cost Estimate
Irrigation System Cost Estimate
North Carolina Archaeological Site Form
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Aerial Photo
Emergency Action Plan, 3 sheets
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Waste Management Facility Site Evaluation
Soil Investigation to Determine Suitability of Proposed Pond
Site
Drainage Area
Earth Fill & Excavation Quantities
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Irrigation System Design Parameters, 6 pages
Specification for Construction of Ponds and Reservoirs
Vegetation Specification
Treatment of Critical Erosion Areas with Permanent Ground
cover
Fencing for Livestock'Exclusion
Fabric Filter Cloth
Construction Specification, Concrete
Operation and Maintenance Plan (by Field Office)
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Drawings
Plan View
1
of 5
Concrete Chute for Water
2
of 5
Concrete Chute for Manure
3
of 5
Details Sheet
4
of 5
Safety Rail
5
of 5

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Management Problems
130 cows are milked on the Bridges -Cook farm. Milking
parlor wash water and polluted runoff are uncontrolled.
Manure is presently scraped and hauled about once a week.
15 heifers are also kept on the lot. Dry cows are
counted in the milk cow number. Milk cows have free access
to a lounging area. The night lounging area is mostly bare
ground next to a ditch.
Day old to 200 lb heifers are confined to barns, sheds
and lots near the milking parlor. All other heifers are
removed from the farm.
II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Ponds for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
Waste storage ponds will be located near the feedlot
and freestall barn. Waste from the milk herd, dry cows and
large heifers will be collected in the waste storage ponds.
The waste storage pond volume (storage period) is the main
factor which determines the management required to prevent
an illegal discharge. Manure should not be applied to land
that is frozen, snow covered, or saturated.
Irrigation will be used to empty the slurry pond. A
small pond will be constructed next to slurry pond to store
lot runoff to flush the irrigation system.
B. Heifer Housing
All weaned heifers will be removed from the farm.
C. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping and guttering will be used where practical.
Guttering will mostly be used on any new buildings.

D. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Livestock are fenced out of the waste storage pond.
Fencing will be changed to create 100 ft. vegetative filters
below lounging area. The filters will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
A stock trail shall be constructed from feedlot -
freestall area to pasture. A heavy use area will be
constructed at entrance of lot at lounging area.
E. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

III. Waste Storage Ponds for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1.
Normal Runoff
for 180 day
period
Use average runoff values
in Ag.
Waste
Management Field
Manual for Cleveland County.
Drainage Area
= 40,741 sq
ft Surface =
31,113 sq ft
Unsurface
= 9,628 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH RAINFALL
°s DEPTH
s
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.89
53 2.06
20
0.78
1.3
FEB.
4.18
57 2.38
25
1.05
1.4
MAR.
4.69
57 2.67
24
1.13
3.1
APR.
3.51
59 2.07
26
0.91
3.6
MAY
3.99
58 2.31
24
0.96
4.3
JUN.
3.93
60 2.36
27
1.06
5.0
JUL.
4.82
60 2.89
27
1.30
5.0
AUG.
4.46
61 2.72
31
1.38
4.2
SEP.
3.42
67 2.29
33
1.13
3.4
OCT.
3.48
62 2.16
30
1.04
2.4
NOV.
3.15
59 1.86
26
0.82
1.7
DEC.
3.90
59 2.30
24
0.94
1.6
47.42
28.07
12.50
37.0
Try 6 months:
Oct. - March Surface Runoff Depth = 13.43"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.76"
Surface Runoff= 13.43" * 31,113 sq ft= 34,820 tuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.76 * 9,628 sq ft = 4,621 tuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surfaces
23.3 - 11.5 = 11.8" = 1.0 ft/6 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 6.0
Runoff = 5.41"
25yr-24hr runoff- 5.41" * 40,741 sq ft = 18,367 tuft
12"/ft

4.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 6.0" = .5 ft.
5.
Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.0 ft
6.
Waste Volume
a. Cows
65 Holsteins @ 1,400 lbs
55 Guernseys @ 1,100 lbs
10 Jerseys @ 900 lbs
Equivalent to 115 Holsteins @ 1,400 lbs
It
is estimated that 50% of the manure will be collected
on
the
feedlot and freestall area.
Volume = 115 cows * 14 aal/day/cow * 180 days * 50%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 19,372 cu ft
b. Large Heifers
15 large heifers spend 50% of the time on the
lot.
Volume = 15 heifers * 10 a1 da cow * 180 days * 50115
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 1,805 cu ft
C. Total Volume
= 19,372 cu ft + 1,805 cu ft = 21,177 cu ft
7.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 100
gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 150
gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water 300
gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50
cral./dav
500 gal./day
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
12,032 cu ft

B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff 34,820
cu ft
2.
Unsurface
Runoff 4,621
cu ft-,
3.
25 year -
24 hour runoff 18,367
cu ft
4.
Manure
21,177
cu ft-
5.
Wash water 12,032
cu ft•,
TOTAL 91,017
cu ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
1.0
7.
25 yr- 24
hr rainfall on pond surface
0.5 ft
8.
Freeboard
+ Emergency Spillway Stage
1.0 ft
TOTAL
2.5ft
C.
Sizing Waste Storage Pond
Two ponds
will be required. A small pond
will be used
to
store water
to flush irrigation system. 8.5'
of depth
will be used.
A pipe will be install to divert
other water
to
slurry pond
after flush pond fills up.
Flush pond dimensions, Bottom - 30' X 30'
SS - 2:1
Top - 741 X 741
Depth to top - 11.0'
Depth to drain pipe - 8.5'
Normal storage volume
= 8.5'/6[30'X30' + 64' X 64' + 4* 47' X 47']
19,595 cu ft
Second pond will require an additional storage of
91,017 - 19,595 = 71,422 cu ft
2:
119' X 119,
75' X 75'
Volume = 8.5/6[ 751* 751+ 109' * 109, + 4(92' * 92')]
= 72,763 cu ft
This is OK.
2.1.1

Normal Pump Out Volume = 1616",
34,820 + 4,621 + 21,177 + 121032 +1.0 *(119 * 119+ 74 X74)
= 92,267 cu ft per 6 months
= 184,574 cu ft per year
= 1,380,000 gal per year
= 50.8 ac-in per year
Flush Pond = 39,190 cu ft/year or 293,141 gal/yr
or 10.8 ac-in per year
Slurry Pond = 145,384 cu ft/year or 1,086,859 gal/yr
or 40.0 ac-in per year
Maximum pond levels
0.5' + 1.0' + 18,367 cu ft/(66" * 66' + 110' X 1101)
= 2.6' below top of dam
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 2.6 below the top of each dam. The emergency
spillway elevation is planned 1.0 foot below the top of dam
elevation.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot area. The District Conservationist
will design all diversions. Diversions shall be designed to
carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store
some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.

V. Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter areas
The stock trails and heavy use areas consist of 9" of
compacted ABC stone over a specified type of filter cloth.
Runoff from the lounging area will be directed across well
maintained grass sod. Vegetated filters shall be maintained
between lounging areas and drainage ways. Filters shall be
100 ft wide. Swells or diversions shall be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to kick water into filters at
frequent intervals.
A. Milk Cows
Milk Cows have access to lounging area located behind
the freestall barns. Vegetative filters at least 100' wide
will be maintained around the lounging areas.
B. Day old to 400 lb Heifer Group
30 young heifers are kept in hutches and sheds near the
milking herd. Approximately 750 of the manure is collected.
Manure will be collected and spread as needed.
Volume
of manure=30 calves*1.5 al hd da * 365 days*.75= 1,647 cuft
7.48 gal/cu ft

VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for milking herd, dry cows and large heifers
will be stored in a waste storage ponds for approximately 6
months and will be irrigated.
During the course of one year, the ponds will store
50.8 ac-in per year of waste. Daily scraping of waste is
required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at
other parts of the farm:
1. Day old to 400 lb Heifers 1,647 cu ft
If all of one years waste were spread using a 200 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 8 loads. Assuming 1
load per hour, it will take 8 hours to spread this manure.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off from the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from the lounging area will be diverted through
100' vegetative filter areas. Grass sods will be maintained
all year round. These areas maybe controlled grazed in late
spring and early fall when ground is dry. weeds may require
chemical control or periodic bush hogging. See plan map.
C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Waste Storage Pond
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT.
(nutrient availability)
N 11,104 lbs. 0.40 4,442 lbs.
P205 6,889 lbs. 0.70 4,822 lbs.
K20 11,503 lbs. 0.70 8,052 lbs.
111 lbs PAN per ac-in
or 4.1 lbs per 1000 gal
Nutrients in flush pond not include in this calculation.
Nutrient content will be low in the flush pond.

b. Other Manure around the Farm ,
TOTAL NUTRIENTS
DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 510 lbs.
0.43 219 lbs.
P205 316 lbs.
0.70 221 lbs.
K20 444 lbs.
0.70 311 lbs.
C. Total Available
Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 4,661 lbs
P205 5,043 lbs
K20 8,363 lbs
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
Spreading Schedule
9 months storage on spring corn
for waste storage
3 months storage on small grain
Spreading Schedule
when cropland is available barns
for other manure
will be cleaned out.
CROP UNITS
ACRES YIELD APPLIC. RATE
Corn Silage tons
22 15.0 1.4 -ac-in/ac
Small Grain tons
14 2.0 0.7 ac-in/ac
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED
lbs applied/ac (lbs. used/ac)
CROP ACRES
N P205 K2O
Corn Silage 22
150 (165)
Small Grain 14
80 (110)
C. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB
MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Silage 22 NNNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Small Gr.14
NNNNN
N = not
a recommended disposal period

VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage pond and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond reaches a point 2.6 ft.
below the top of the dam, the storage pond shall be emptied.
A post will be set with its top at this elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be checked
and repaired as required.

Waste Storage Ponds Cost Estimate
Excavation - 3,609 cu yd @ $2.00 per cu yd = $7,218.00
Vegetation - Seed and Mulch graded area around pond
and diversions
4.G 1.5 ac @ $516.00 per ac = $774.00
Diversions - 620 ft @ $2.00 per ft = $1,240.00
Other Vegetation such as filter areas - Seed 1.0 acre
Seeding - 1.0 acre @ $216.00 per ac = $216.00
Seedbed - 1.0 acre @ $50.00 per ac = $50.00
$266.00
Pipe connecting flush pond and slurry pond
70' - 12" PVC pipe @ $16.00 per ft = $1,120.00
1 elbow @ $135.00 = $135.00
$1,255.00
Extending parlor water pipe to slurry pond
16' - 12" concrete pipe @ $13.00 per ft = $208.00
Concrete Chutes
Slurry Chute 7.6 cu yd plus 20°s
Concrete-- 9.1 cu yd @ $100.00/cu yd= $910.00
Steel - 662, @ .668 lbs/ft @ $0.74/lb = 327.24
$1,237.24
Feedlot Chute 5.5 cu yds plus 2015
Concrete - 6.6 cu yds @ $100.00 per cu yd = $660.00
Steel - 250 sq ft = 53 lbs @ $0.74/lb = $39.22
Steel - 45' @ .668 lb/ft @ $0.74/lb = $22.24
$721.46
Concrete Slab at Slurry Chute - Gonnrc+ e4,r 40 /,/-
Concrete - 1,200 sq ft X 411 = 14.8 cu yds plus 2016
17.8 cu yds @ $100.00 per cu yd = $1,780.00
Steel - 1200 sq ft @ 21 lbs/100 sq ft = 252 lbs
252 lbs @ $0.74/lb = $186.48
$1,966.48
Concrete Hump at entrance to Lot
.5' X 6' X 15' = 1.7 cu yds
1.7 cu yds @ $100.00 per cu yd = $170.00
Concrete Curbs - 230, x 8" X S"
Concrete - 3.8 cu yd @ $250.00 per cu yd = $950.00
Steel - 307 ft @ .668 lbs/ft @ $0.74 per lb = $151.75
$1,101.75
Safety Bar at Push Off Ramp
labor and materials @ $200.00 each $200.00

Fencing around Pond, filter at lounging area and stock trail
Barb wire - 800 ft @ $1.50 per ft = $1,200.00
1 gate @ $65.00 each = $65.00
$1,265.00
Stock Trails - Estimated Length = 220' X 12.5'
Grading - 220' Q $1.50 per ft = $330.00
Gravel - 130 ton @ $12.00 per ton = $1,560.00
Filter Cloth - 306 sq yd Q $2.00 per sq yd= $612.00
$2,502.00
20' - 18" CPP Q $9.75 per ft = $195.00
Total = $20,319.93
Irrigation System Cost Estimate
The nutrient content of waste stored in waste storage pond
is estimated to be 111 lbs PAN per acre -inch. The pond will
store 50.8 ac-in per year. This will require a solid set
irrigation set up for approximately 23 plus acres. The
cropping system will determine the exact number of acres
needed.
It is recommended that the irrigation system designer be
given field location, size, slope, soil type, maximum
application rate, -crops, and maximum application per
irrigation. If a 23 acre application area is large enough,
the system is estimated to cost between 30,000.00 and
50,000.00 dollars.
Typical system cost
Propeller Agitator - $6,000.00
Pump - $5,300.00
Traveling Gun $16,500.00
Dry Hydrants & Pipe $10,000.00

Attachment 5
t 1 .L- A. fl !�r /y %Q ,
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM
FOR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE USE ONLY
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY/DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
STATE SITE NUMBER:
1. SITE NAME(S):
2. INSTITUTION: SDA-SCS 1 3. DATE RECORDED: - Z 5'4 7
4. RECORDER: & )?ak4sll,
S. PROJECT NAME: _ W a5 �e :k& jn u Po As cr 4 $%a k T]' -J
6. COUNTY: L; leu-e tavJ 7. USGS QUAD MAP: -fiv e
8. DIRECTIONS TO SITE:
9. DESCRIBE TOPOGRAPHY:
10. SOIL MAP UNIT':- if. ec.; I
11. DESCRIBE VEGETATION/VISIBILITY:
12. SITE DESCRIPTIONIDIMENSIONS: 7o0 , Y,30 Q ,
13. LIST ARTIFACTS: A/Oht Fou 4
Atr-,.
14. CULTURAL COMPONENTS: (check) PREHISTORIC: HISTORIC
15. OWNER AND/OR TENAN"T; UN FORMANT: @ ,r L o L
ADDRESS: _ 3szrj , ►CPh 171 & 4i re- 4001A t& z f3 ac 0
PHONE: 78/'L
> > > ATTACH PHOTOCOPY OF THE SECTION OF L'SGS SHOWING SITE LOCATION < < <

F
,r I
Polkville
I
'
I y_
; 1361 �• •BM
;108!
r
r _
Trailer
Park
' 107
ITrailer
Pa
44
! i�• f• II �`-
� •
e9
� i
J I
I
"`hl
5 r '0 60
IL
-00
,4
f/•�., .�
�� ,��., ,
,, . ° ,W
J
I d
ro
_
692
r
'"
I
25'
s[19
3118
k
1016
91509o[IN
INT[!1lO�—O[OLG CP L SVNV[V• PISTON, VISOIN,At f0�� - `• 5*22'3"
44200"-E .43 81°37'30"
ROAD CLASSIFICATION 'ry
Primary highway, Light -duty road, hard or
hard surface.___.__•.:..•_ improved surface._...-'
Secondary highway,
hard surface ._............ .w � Unimproved road .............
CInterstate Route 0 U. S. Route G State Route
POLKVILLE, N. C.
QUADRANGLE LOCATIONNW/4 SHELBY 15' QUADRANGLE
N3522.5—W8137.5/7.5
1982
MA 4654 1 N11V—$ERI$S V842

0
i t;V.`A_
Iliiq
or
to .9
VIAitP _1%
It
Ij, .7X il I Z
h. j 1+
0 im
1 14
Wrye
AA,
it
*4 x
Z4
L. . —' . I , 1 .41
'Ny
OF-
14
sp,
IT
id]
irk 19
t
NZ, jo
tz_ ot
J
'4A 7

3r�d9�s ��r C,ack ���y ..� �•.
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
_ e
SmIrce — _— Cause , Rhips to minimize odor Site Specific Praclices
Farruslcarl + Dairy production 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers
n Recommended best management practices
1( Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn alley Wei manure -covered surfaces n Scrapu or flush daily
surfaces ❑ Promote drying with proper ventilation _
Gil Routine checks and maintenance on wale:rers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
liedded areas
• Urine
ld
Pronsote drying'with proper ventilation
+ Partial microbial decomposition
Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
Hamm: Dry slacks
0 Partial microbial decomposition
Provide liquid drainage: for stored mamire
Sturilge lank or hasin
• Partial microbial Decomposition ;
n
Bottom or midlevel loading
sus face
+ Mixing while filling ;
Ll
Tank covers
_
+ Agitation when emptying
n
Basin surface orals of solids;
D
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
n Agitate only prior to manure removal
n Promi biological additives or oxidants
Scaling basin Surfaces
Partial microbial decomposition
0
Liquid drainage from settled solids
•
Mixing white fifling
Ell
Remove solids regularly
•
Agilanann when emptying
Alanure, slurry or sludge
Agitation when spreading
n
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
stucadcl. outlets
Volatile gams ernissiolls
n
Wash residual manure: froin spreader after use
C7
Proven biological additives or oxidants
I incovcred uranure, 0
Volatile gas emissions while
n
Soil injection of sherry/sludges
slurry of sloelge uu field
drying
n
Soil iucorporalinn wilhiu alb firs
!,III tikes
Spread in thin nuifemn layers fete rilllld eln-ylnl;
17
Proven biological addilives or oxielanls
1-IIIsII I:urhs •
Agitation ofrecycled lagoon
n
I'htsh lank- covers;
llelnnl while tanks are tilling
0
Extend fill lines to near bulletin of tanks wilt
aall-snplinn vents
Oniside chain coflection • Agitation during wasic%vater n iiox covers
or juuclion boxes conveyance
Ahl()f' - Noveuther 11, 1996, Page

Source Cause DMPs to Minimize Odor' Site Specific Practices
Lift Stations • Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump truck covers
filling and drawdown
Fnd of drainpipes at^ - . , Agitation during wastewater CI Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission; Cl Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum srirface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler 0 l ligh pressure agitation; Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
it" LzleS 0 Wind drift RIJ Minimum recommended operating procedure;
❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
0 Pump from second -stage lagoon;
flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
I )cad animals • Carcass decomposition 10 Proper disposition of carcasses
Slandin6 %vater around 0 Improper drainage; L1 Grade and landscape such That Witter drains
laciliiies . Microbial decomposition of away from lacilitics
organic tualler
Atnd iracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads ❑ farm access road snainienance .
roads lioot Iarin access
Adilkional 111fornialion : Available From:
Cattle ManlrrC Management ; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSI1, Counly Extension Center
Dairy Educational unit htanure Management System - take Wheeler Road field Laboratory ; PAW-- 209-95 NCSU - IIAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; FBAF 103-83 NCSI I - 11A E
Management of hairy Wastewater ; EBAE 106-83 NCSI I - IIAE
Calihniliuu of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; E11AF Fact Sheet NCSII - IIAIi
Nuisance Cimccrns in Animal Mantire Management: Odors and Flies; 111It0107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
Aht! K' - November I I, 1996, Page 2

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Snurce Cause BMPs to Cottlrol Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Clutters • Accumulalion of solids O flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gullers as designed-
13 Remove bridging of accunwlaled solids ;it
discharee
Lagoons and his Crusted Solids 11 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize [lie
crtsting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
S ioclics over more than 30% of surface.
Fxc%:''bive Vegctativc decaying vegetaliolt M Maintain vegetative control along banks of
t iru1v111 lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waler's edge on inipoundnienl's perimeter.
_ Dry Systems
1 enters -�--- • Deed Spillage n Design, operate and maintain feet! syslenis (e.g.,
bunkers and iroughs) to minimize lire
accumulation of decaying wastage.
Deed Sruray.c 0 Accumulalions of feed residucs
Gl Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval daring summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
CI Retluce innisture acc•ttnulatiou within and
around ininicdiaic perimeter of Iced storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing ude(loale eootaiiintent
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moislur: grain products).
C1 Inspect for anti reiiiove'br break tip accunridaied
solids in filler strips around feed storage as
needed.
ANIK: - Pltrventbcr t I, 19,16, Page I

inure
Ani►ua! Ilolding Areas
Cause
BMPs to Control Lrsects.
• Accumulations of animal wastes I Eliminate low areas that trap moist►►re along
Mid feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal. J
$� Maintain fence rows and filter *strips around
aninsal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Di y Manure I lamlling Accumulations of animal wastes n Itemove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Syste►ns clay interval during summer; 15-30 clay interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
n Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles,
C3 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
Site
For more infonnauian contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State l Iniver0y,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
►ccific Praclices
AAIIC - tdr►venil►cr 11, 1996, Page 2

`Mortality Management Methods
(check- which methodf.$) are being implemented)
Burial three fee+ beneath the surface of the around ' ' hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 fe--::.om any flowing
stream or public body of water.
J Rende-ina at a rendering plant licensed untie: G.S. IC6-168.?
Comulete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of .agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State V e:e:inarian %would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value %virhout endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Vetennarian must be
attached)

�-. United States Natural .
{� Department of Resources
Agriculture Conservation
Service
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME Teyf L
ALoa k
TELEPHONE ya 4 .- . ,'j A —'7 A i 7.
NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-96
LOCATION ht FA4irei[cQ
o �O
SIZE OPERATION J -O t) l ry.
LOCATION DATA
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER oy FT.
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACILITY (school, church, eta) Z Apo FT.
IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN?
YES _ NO Z
If yes, MRCS cannot provide assistance
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL STREAM?
YES NO
If no, site must be relocated
IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY?
YES NO V
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval.
ARE UIiL1TiFS IN CONSTRUCTION AREA?
YES NO
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site
evaluation.
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON -CROPLAND? YES _ NO
If yes, producer must complete Form MRCS-CPA-38 (Request for Certified
Wetland Determinadon/Delineation).
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES _ NO
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF
ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY LAND UNTIL A WETLAND DELINEATION
IS MADE.
MRCS will provide technical assistance in wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland
inclusions less than one acre in size, NRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values lost are fully
mitigated. For natural wetlands greater than one acre in size, NRCS will provide assistance only after a
rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimization of Impacts, and compensatory mitigation is
carried out in that order of preference.
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER:
• PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION? YES V NO
• PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST 112 X' A YES T NO
OF THE CAPACITY?
• USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN LAND APPLICATION YES NO
OF WASTE?

NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-98
__.
Page 2 _.
OTHEfiENiYIHONMF ALAL'FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT?
YES _
NO
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AREA OR
WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA?
YES _
NO
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED AREA? .
YES
NO
ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LACALLY IMPORTANT FARMLANDS IN THE
YES
NO
OPERATINGUNTT? Agenej peticy fellows
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING7
YES _
NO
If the amwer to any of the above is yes, MRCS will not provide technical
assistance unless agency policy Is followed.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY ALL WASTE YES NO
INCLUDING SLUDGE. ALTHOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
IF NO. DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES _ NO
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND YES NO _
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE?
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL INVESTIGATION -VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION
SHEET ATTACHED
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR h*GQQ W? Wosf"e. ,rn q G n ��/
YES Y
NO
IS A LINER REQUIRED? 44
YES ✓
NO
TYPE OF LINER TO BE USED:
CLAY ZBENTONTI'E
_ SYNTHETIC _
IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED, ES SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON
YES V
NO
SITE?
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE. DOES LANDOWNER HAVE
YES
NO
ACCESS TO CLAY?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
YES
NO
(Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT?
YES _
NO
(If yes, We must be removed or plugged)
SITE APPROVED YES NO CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID FOR TWELVE MONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRUCTION
HAS NOT BEEN STARTED WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS, A NEW SITE INVESTIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED. y
SIGNATURE _ DATE
I! Changes in the local or state law or changes in the standard could require a new site investigation.

INDE ■ '■I■ ■ ■'■I■I■ ■I■ ■f■I■ ■!■

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Unt, on(- of sy%temc below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION I� USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW - Wrl l graded gravel-: itravel, sand mix I g- gravel -
GP-Pnotly ginded Rtavels } s-sand
GM - Silty j!vive1c; gravel sand-crlt mix vt:: - very fine stand
GC - Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix sl -sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands: sand -gravel mix fsl- fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands 1- loam
SM - Silty sand gl - gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands: sand -clay mixtures si - sill
ML -Silts; silty. v. fine sands: sandy or clavey silt sil - silt loam
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity cl - clay loam
CH - Inorganic clays of high plasticity Biel -silty clay loam
MH- Elastic silts act -.sandy.clay loam
OL- Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity . sic -silty, clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity c-clay
1. Suitable material for embankment i. available Weis ' 0 No 11ndicerr mAem rartahm en tt- .krrch apt
atpEnir sal
REMA L.KS: .F
I Earplain hasardi requiring special attention in denlytn r.Srer+a�e. ra.nw, ,od arc t
GENERAL REMARKS:
24 25 26 27 28 29 1 V 31 321193 V 34 35 36 37 M 39 40 41 42 i3 44 4514611i7148 IQ W 51
II
JAJ
.t

)3\25
=196.54
, 74--I s 44
-7,
8 �- �` t-
Milking Parlor
21 kC
y =19 5 EL= w O1.$3
EL=198. -
y EL=198.65
EL=194, Q`Q L=200.99
o.c
Ereestalls Qo-� EL=198.46EL=19 .91 Barn
=192.99=196.67 ���-�� TBM
7` EL=200.00 E =2 =2 0.80
12.82=196.50 EL=2 4
EL=196.33 = 0 31
92 �� L=199.73
EL 2. 4 EL-198.61 �1^Ia4n
.Pipe Invert �r tie ' •�,,
EL=193.30 ������ cl40,

U. S'. Department of Agriculture NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
File Code: 210
....HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner Ze' 'o County a a
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water ..to Top of Dam 1 I Ft. Length of Fl.00d Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 47-9— q
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est.—Elev. :Est. ElevaFlon
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land. Use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
:. Flood Plain: Flood Plain
t. Ft...PO 4,rc ' ' . iJ Ft. Ft.
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and d mage to existing or probable future downstream.
improvements from a sudden breach n2
Hazard Classification of Dam Gb, c) (see HEM -Part 520.211' 0.
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)�� °
By
�a e
7), C,
e
Concurred By
ame ti le
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date

I 1
INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical iisis'tance from the Soil Conservation Service
must have a hazard classification assigned by the person responsible for
approving -the design. '-Most farm ponds:••except in borderline cases, canbe classified after a complete field investigation without assuming failure
and making breach studies.' This data sheet is to be -used for: recording
the information obtained through field. studies and for documenting the
-hazard classification.' Where there is a. possibility fbr.Toss of life or
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult. with .the. area engineer:j- :yr'..:'
Hazard classifications of dams"ire imade by, evaluating the Possibility
for loss of life and the extent of damage that would result if the dam
should suddenly breach --that- is --a section of. the .dam..be. suddenly .and .._.
,ompi'etel'y -washed -out. = It is to be assumed that a wal l of water will be
.rel eased equal tb_*;the height of ­ the `dam. This flood wave will be reduced
,.in height as it moves down the�� flood' plain. The wave height (depth of
_flood'ing) shouT'd he evaluated for a .sufficient distance.downstream until—.-.—:
the estimated flood level will not cause significant damage to improvements,
such as homes, buildings, roads., -utilities, reservoirs,.'etc. The breach
flood level will -be reduced depending on the valley storage', slope, and '
----openess • of the flood plain; however,.. in . a. narrow. steep valley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
- - evaluation is to compare available. valley storage. (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
...evaluated with a Judgment estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
-the area engineer -.should be consulted before making design commitments. .... :........-

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
Jerry Cook and Charles Bridges
Bridges & Cook
Dairy Farm
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Designed for a herd size of 230 Dairy animals
In Cooperation with
Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation District
and
U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service
Cost Share Funding provided through the
N.C. Agricultural Cost Share Program
April 24, 1997

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SYSTEM OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . III
1.
WASTE STORAGE POND . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 1
2.
MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPE . . . . . . .
. . . . . 2
3.
IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 3
4.
CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM. . . .
. . . . . 4
5.
CONCRETE CURBING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . , 5
6.
VEGETATED DIVERSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 6
7.
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 7
8.
FILTER AREA PLANTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 8
9.
STOCK TRAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 9
GENERAL COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 10
Bridges & Cook DAIRY Farm
Cleveland County, N.C. April 24, 1997

SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following
major components:
1. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPE
2. WASTE STORAGE POND
3. IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
5. FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREA
and the following associated components
6. CONCRETE CURBING
7. VEGETATED DIVERSION
8. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
9. FILTER AREA PLANTING
10. STOCK TRAILS
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and stored in the
WASTE STORAGE POND. Slurry waste will be irrigated from the
SLURRY WASTE STORAGE POND at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE
POND is designed to provide 180 days storage for the slurry
wastes produced by 130 head dairy herd.
Also contaminated runoff will flow into the WASTE STORAGE POND.
This structure is designed to provide storage for runoff from the
feedlot and waste water from the milk barn for a 180 days period
and provide storage space for the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-
four (24) hour storm runoff from the feedlot and any watershed
into the pond.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent
discharge of Animal Waste Contaminates to surface waters from the
twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required
under the Non -discharge regulations.
Runoff from l i �areap is diverted through 100, of filter
areas.
Small heifer feed areas in barns and lots will, also be collected
and Spread.
All maintenance and operation costs are the responsibility of the
landowner and cannot be cost shared.
Bridges & Cook DAIRY Farm
Cleveland County, N.C. April 24, 1997

1. WASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store manure, feedlot
runoff and waste water from the milk barn for a 180 days period.
Additional storage space is included to contain the twenty-five
(25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm runoff from the feedlot.
A post will be installed with the level of the top of post
indicating the level of storage available prior to infringing on
the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity. The maximum storage level
is 1.6 ft. below the emergency spillway elevation. The WASTE
STORAGE POND consists of an earthen dam and concrete chute for
discharging contaminated water and manure into the structure.
OPERATION
The service life of the WASTE STORAGE POND will be determined by
the level of management for the entire system. Once the manure
and bedding materials have reached the WASTE STORAGE POND, how
effectively the waste is agitated will determine the amount of
solids which remain in the WASTE STORAGE POND.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the
WASTE STORAGE POND. The accumulated solids should not reduce the
usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to a.point which
requires removal of the solids for many years IF adequate lot
scraping and waste agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor
management will result in the rapid accumulation of solids which
will reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to the
point that some form of dredging will be required. If a large
volume of solid waste is allowed to wash from the lot and/or if
inadequate agitation is performed, this dredging operation could
be required in a very short period of time.
If at any point in the future the usable capacity of the WASTE
STORAGE POND becomes reduced to the point -that solids must be
removed, the removal of these solids will be at your expense.
This would be part of the maintenance of your system and cannot
be cost shared.
Bridges & Cook DAIRY Farm
Cleveland County, N.C. April 24, 1997

MAINTENANCE
The concrete in the WASTE STORAGE POND should be inspected
periodically for major cracks. Vegetation on the dam should be
inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a
vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to
prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place only
when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be
mowed to a height of less than four(4) inches at any time. See
FILTER AREA PLANTING for further maintenance requirements. Any
evidence of sloughing or seepage should be reported to the
Cleveland Soil & Water Conservation District office.
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPE
OVERVIEW
The milking parlor waste water pipe consist of concrete pipe from
milking parlor to waste storage pond.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the PIPING SYSTEM for cracks
or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed. Inspect
the drop structures seasonally and remove accumulated solids.
3. IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM consists of a Pump, requiring
large tractor with H. P. specified, with a suction line and
underground pipe to irrigation fields, above ground hydrants and
a traveling gun with a bore nozzle. See irrigation design for
design data.
Bridges & Cook
Cleveland County, N.C.
DAIRY Farm
April 24, 1997
2

OPERATION
Cleveland Soil & water Conservation District staff and/or USDA -
Natural Resources Conservation Service staff will be present
during the first irrigation operation to assist in determination
of optimum equipment calibration level required for each of the
gun setups.
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid
level reaching the full storage level marker in the structure.
When the liquids level in the WASTE STORAGE POND reaches the
marker, liquids must be removed by pumping from the structure,
either into the irrigation system or to a spreader tank for land
application. Do not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff
or erosion. Do not irrigate on frozen or saturated soils.
Irrigate only until soil is near saturation point.
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly
agitate the waste in the Holding Pond. For irrigation, the gate
valve controlling agitation will be closed and the irrigation
mainline valve will be opened. The gun will already be at one of
the hydrants, the other will be plugged. This gun can operate
a maximum of under ideal dry conditions. The irrigation
mainline valve must.be closed to change the gun location. For
filling spreaders, the agitation control valve will remain open
while the filler valve is opened. The agitation valve may be
throttled down to divert more volume to filler line.
MAINTENANCE
Soil test the irrigation fields annually. Vegetation in the
irrigation fields should be inspected periodically and reseeded
as needed to insure a vigorous stand. Fields may also need to be
limed and fertilized annually. It is essential that neither
vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within
the irrigation fields. The irrigation fields should be mowed at
least annually to prevent woody growth. The irrigation fields
may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing
operations must take place only when the soils are dry, and
vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than
four (4) inches. See FILTER AREA PLANTING for further
maintenance requirements.
Bridges & Cook DAIRY Farm
Cleveland County, N.C. April 24, 1997

4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AM PIPING SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
Clean water collection and piping consist of piping clean water
under stock trails and diverting clean water around lounging and
feedlot areas.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the components of the CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING
SYSTEM annually for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or
replace as needed. Inspect annually and remove accumulated
sediment.
5. CONCRETE CURBING
OVERVIEW
The CONCRETE CURBING constructed on the lot will prevent
contaminated liquids from entering the stream in any storm less
severe than the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour
storm.
MAINTENANCE
The concrete should be inspected periodically for major cracks.
6. VEGETATED DIVERSION
OVERVIEW
A VEGETATED DIVERSION will be located above the WASTE STORAGE
POND and will convey non -contaminated runoff around the
structure. Diversions will also be located around the feedlot
to divert clean water.
Bridges & Cook
Cleveland County, N.C.
DAIRY Farm
April 24, 1997
4

MAINTENANCE
The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically
and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand. it is
essential that neither vehicles nor livestock be allowed to
create travel lanes within the diversion. The diversion should
be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The
diversion may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and
mowing operations must take place only when the soils are dry,
and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less
than four (4) inches. If sedimentation has reduced the capacity
of the channel, contact the Cleveland Soil and Water Conservation
District for technical assistance in correcting this problem.
See FILTER AREA PLANTING for further maintenance requirements.
Bridges & Cook DAIRY Farm
Cleveland County, N.C. April 24, 1997

7. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed at locations as indicated
on plan maps. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed according to
NRCS standard 382 (Fencing).
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical
damage or rot. If fencing wire becomes loose, re -tighten to
original specifications. If fence posts are rotted or damaged in
any way, replace damaged posts with a post which meets the
original specifications.
8. FILTER AREA PLANTING
OVERVIEW
FILTER AREA PLANTING applies to seeding 100' of grass below the
lounging areas and seeding diversions. At least 25' of grass
area should be maintained between ditches and stock trails.
MAINTENANCE
Soil samples should be taken at least once per year. Fertilizer
and lime should be applied at the rates recommended as a result
of the soil test. Fertilizer and lime should be applied either
during September -October or February -March. Vegetation should be
inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a
vigorous stand. The filter area may be control grazed or mowed
for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take place only when
the soils are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed
to a height of less than four (4) inches. All FILTER AREA
PLANTING should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody
growth. Mowing operations must take place only when the soil is
dry and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less than
four (4) inches at any time. Do not mow cool season grasses
during periods when plants are showing signs of drought stress.
Bridges & Cook
Cleveland County, N.C.
DAIRY Farah
April 24, 1997
6

9. STOCK TRAILS
OVERVIEW
Stock trails will be located as indicated on plan maps.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the stock trails periodically for damage and wear. If
gravel layer becomes thin, gravel shall be replaced to maintain a
minimum of 4" of cover over the filter cloth. Manure
accumulations in broad based dips on stock trail shall be removed
at regular intervals to prevent overtopping.
GENERAL COMMENTS
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides
so that desirable vegetation, especially that of the filter area,
diversion and dam, is not adversely affected. It is a violation
of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted by its
labeling. To protect yourself, never apply any pesticide in a
manner or for a purpose other than as instructed on the label or
in labeling accompanying the pesticide product -that you purchase.
Do not ignore the instructions for use of protective clothing and
devices and for storage and disposal of pesticide wastes,
including containers.
REPAIRS
Notify the Cleveland Soil and Water conservation District if
repairs or major modifications are required for any of the
components of this Waste Management System.
Bridges & Cook
Cleveland County, N.C.
DAIRY Farm
April 24, 1997
7

•. , /
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
BRIDGES AND COOK DAIRY
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 704-663-1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 704-484-4841
SWCD 704-471-0235, EXT. 3
NRCS 704-471-0235, EXT. 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an
accessible location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action
items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Storage Structure overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -actions include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

r
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of storage structure. Often this is seepage as
opposed to flowing leaks. Possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note an obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was release and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3,' Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office: Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency number:
919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your name, facility,
telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact
location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under
taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone
number 704-484-4841.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 704-482-4365, local SWCD office phone
number 704-471-0235, extension 3, and local NRCS office for
advice/technical assistance phone number 704-471-0235, extension 3.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain
your problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize
off -site damage.
a. Contractor Name: Hendricks Grading Com an
b. Contractors Address: 1168_W, Stagecoach Trail, Lawndale, NC 28090
c. Contractors Phone: [phone]

6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the storage structures (MRCS,
Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: Ben Robinson, DC
b. Phone:.[phone], extension 3
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
beep problems with release of wastes from happening again.

LANDOWNER ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL
OF PROPOSED PLAN
I have read the detailed plans for this waste management system and have reviewed the
construction drawings and specifications developed for this system by representatives of the
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and approved on /zs q7
The components shown on the plan represent the alterative of my choice and is acceptable as
a waste management system on my farm. I understand the requirements of the plan and
agree to implement, or cause to be implemented, the details of this plan to the best of my
abilities with technical assistance provided by representatives of the USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
I have read the "Operation and Maintenance Plan" and the "Waste Utilization Plan" and
fully understand both of these documents and agree to follow these plans. I understand the
North Carolina Cost Share Program Contract signed by me on requires that I
maintain this system according to the "Operation and Maintenance Plan" for a period of no
less than ten (10) years from the date of final cost share payment. Failure on my part to
follow this plan may result in prosecution by the State of North Carolina under the terms of
the Contract. If I find any part of either of these plans is not workable, I will contact the
Soil and Water Conservation District so an acceptable alternative plan may
be developed.
I am fully aware that modifications to the proposed plan may be required after construction
to insure that the system operates in the manner and with the efficiency for which it was
planned. Changes in this plan may not be made either during or after construction without
the mutual consent and cooperation of myself and the G euel4&% Soil and Water
Conservation District. I agree to cooperate with USDA Natural Resources Conservation
Service representatives in an effort to maintain and operate this system as effectively as
possible.
The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service representative has thoroughly reviewed
with me this comprehensive waste management plan and the associated cost share
reimbursement provisions. All questions have been addressed and answered to my
satisfaction.
le�ndoQer Name
f
USDA -MRCS or SWCD Representative
Date
Y/3 o/g T
Date
USDA-NRCS December 1995

Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
r
r
f
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
d9r45es £ a.k DdlY
J ckkfY6 CZAC1 County: C 1 e ut) CI VS
5
z Date:
7/W- - 5113 - 70 / z
EX 03rr D-1
Held'
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
ol'Fleld2
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
I Crop(B)
Maximum
Application
Rste3
(lulhr)
Maximum
Application
pir Irrleatlon
Cycid
(inches)
Comments
3
P
Z—
S• Q
p� n
I�
y.
1 See attached map.
2Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
311efer to N. C. irrigation Guide, Field Office Teclurical Guide, Section If G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rules for the soil and crop used.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

EXH1BIr D-2
TABLE Z - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Model
..
Field No'
ow
TRAVEL LANE
f_
R_Ctn-)_
EQUIPMENT SUTINGS,
Nozzle Operating .,
G
Flo L;
i�M
��
r
P—MMI
M'_'
rwl'AMMMM1�9M1
MMMM������
�4c4ucLI wettabte. �► YB.G� ac.
1See attached map.
2Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
3Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of are.
NRCS, NC
JUNE,' 19%

P,XEM1717 D-3
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field Nol
and
line Not
Number of
Hydrants
Wetted
Diameter.
feet
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
Along Between
Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
in/hr(inches)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Node Operating Operating
Diameter - Pressure Time
Gun ( sl) @H Brant r
Comments
I3ee attached map.
23how separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in each field.
` NRCS, NC
TUNE, 1996
•
a

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
Q FU
Design Precipitation Rate (Inlhr)
3$••
Nose Length (feet)
/
xxxxxXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
�-
�U
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
t
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Sllccifications
Dealoner ennv nrnvide thrust hinelc detaile nn eenwrate sheet_
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.
900 Bend
Dead End
Tee
'See USDA -MRCS Field Office Tedwical Guide, Section 1V, P(actice Code 430-131).
r '
EXI ITT D-4
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

i i,4,11:11dUzi
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar shed most convinient to the designer/supplier.-
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
}�
..._
i NRCS, NC
J11NE, 1996

EXHIBIT D-5
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESI NER .
Name: W:F .ov ;F
Company:
Address -
Phone:
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
I . A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, ttuust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements,
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s),
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section 1V, Practice Code 430-DD.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as
appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buf er strip y%sl feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.
NRCS, NC
TUNE, 1996

_. 1
,dr1 05 DIr
CAWMP Wenabla Aga Tt wXmg Gun Fidd Data dmi. MGM
G QU�? l� ,
Hard Hose Traveling un System
FIELD DATA SHEET
1. Make and model number
2. Hose length e3�jfeet] and hose inside diameter (ID)[inch]
3. Gun make and model number/V e—L can /DU
4. Gun nozzle size D, 9 Cinch], ring orifice, taper bore orifice..
5. Gun arc angle 3/ [degrees]
6. Travel lane spacing :Z 1 D [feet]. Indicate whether uniform, random.
Number of exterior hydrants 3 Number of interior hydrants
7. Gun wetted diameter zRS [feet]- measured, based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure 1pC) f psi]. observed at working gauge,
,fee
determined from gun charts, / calculated (show calculations) by SokN,•�n
**9. Operating pressure at hose reel [psil observed at working gauge,
provided by owner.
* * 10. Supply he size [inch] (from pump to last hydrant).
** 11. Supply line length feet (maximum pumping distance).
* * 12. Supply he type PVC, aluminum.
* * 13 . Pump make and model number
* * 14. Pump capacity, m].
** 15. Engine make and model number
or
* * 16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp] [rpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended that operating pressure at the reel and gun wetted
diameter be field determined.
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres will be determined by travel lane
* * Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information furnisheI
-,
andlor
Signature of Owner or Facility Representative re of T 'cat Specialist
a a epy,"
Printed Name of Owner or Facility Representative Printed name of T hnicl pcaalist
Date Date Al Q
*** the data sheet.
Only the person or persons collecting the data shout sign

CAWMP Wettable Acre /� i ? `fQ ;9 y., ��, .�� V Traveling Gun Computatiaul W 2-20.99
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
! COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) Field Number (Identification) 3 a
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes .rfeet]'Length of pull(L 1)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes �lfeet ] Length ofpull(L2)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _[fed] Length ofpull(L3)
4. Wetted Diameter 7-9 S[feet] From: field data sheet
5. Spacing Z 10 Hydrant Spacing [feet], [as percent of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant Layout _Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane locatio
' Travel Lane Length�`W Interior or Exterior (Lanehiydrant)
►_ (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 7Q Column
t Z. (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
(Pull Length a i [feet] X Wetted Width 22-o [feet)) / 43,560
3 S (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table _ L! L 70 Column
_ Total acres for Travel Lane Length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel Lane Length ; Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
_ (a) Acres start end of pull from Table &.4f 7o Column —rE.
zs(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L0
{Pull Length Z fra o [feet] X Wetted Width Z 1 D [feet]) / 43,560
3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Tabled Column _F
Z.06 Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
G "Travel Lane Length JM Interior or ��Exterior (Lane/Hydrant) (fnd
is (a) Acres start end of pull from Table N 1�- L Column E_,
(b) Acres middle portion of pul14L 1)
{Pull Length [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]) 143,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table ' Column
S bSTotaI acres for Travel Lane Length (13) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Md1tiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number pulls of each category in the
field. Sum f these and this is the total irrigated acreage for th 1 .
k�
ee (a) Acres per Tra a Length 1- # Lanes = Acres
S (b) Acres per Travel Lan (L2) X # Lanes - Acres
(c) Acres per Tr Lane Length (L3 # Lanes - Acres
Tgta AWMP Wettable Acres for fi um: Sa + 8b + 80
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 4nft Date: 4

t3 r IrGiA 2S �` C p� r ; act Yam} ✓�/L�C�Z ��O
CAWMP Wetla6le Aero � Tnrve6g Gun Canputaia W Work4we4 2-20-"
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) Field Number (Identification)
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes [feet] Length of puU(L1)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes __jfeet) Length of pull(L2)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes ,Meet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted Diameter [feet] From field data sheet
5. Spacing Hydrant Spacing [feet] [as percent of wetted diameter)
6. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel Lane Length ff::Z} Interior or ✓ Exterior (LanelHydrant)
, q (y (a) Acres start end of pull from Table N E 70
Column
Y. 60 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
{Pull Length 4 LD[feet] X Wetted Width
'ZZ-0 [feet]} 143,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table
Column
5S Total acres for Trav Lane Length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
---r �% Travel Lane Length (Ed)Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
p- q-5- (a) Acres start end of pull from Tables 7 U
Column
G,Sa (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull Length SU [feet] X Wetted Width
Z 10 [feet]) / 43,560
�-- (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table
Column
ar, D 3 Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
` Travel Lane Length (W) Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
-Qd-5-(a) Acres start end of pull from Table p
Column.
413 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) .
{Pull Length�,50' [feet) X Wetted Width
Z1D [feet]) / 43,560
— (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table
Column
5 n3 Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the
field. Sum all of these and is the total irrigated acr r the field.
5� (a) Acres per Travel e Le (L1) X # Lanes - Acres
(b) Acres per Travel a gth (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per TOO Lane Lengt�L3) X # Lanes - Acres
To!!jRAWMP Wettable Acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
r
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by:
l
Dater

cAwMP Wettable Acm / Tmvdina Gun Comp.1.9 9 WoWwet, 2-20-99
Hard Hose Traveling Gun"Systero
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) Field Number (identification)
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes [feet] Length of pull(LI)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes � [feet] Length of pull(L3 )
4. Wetted Diameter [feet] From field data sheet
5. Spacing Hydrant Spacing [feet] [as percent of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
t based on pattern, spacing, and vel lane location.
j Travel Lane Length') Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
�(a) Acres start end of pull from Table -T� 70 Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
(Pull Length_? �T[feet] X Wetted Width Z10 [feet]) 143,560
wow (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
0 Total acres for Travel Lane Length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
_ Travel Lane Length %4) _.,/ Interior or Exterior (LanelHydrant)
5— (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 70 Column
�9 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
(Pull Length qS0 [feet] X Wetted Width Z / o [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
S, a3 Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel Lane Length (U) Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)r
%15- (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 0 Column F
y� S� (b) Acres middle portion of ull (L1)
{Pull Length ° 3 [feet] X Wetted Width wo [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
-�,'�Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel
field. �m al of these and this is the total irrigated e;
� e_
�I (a) Acres per Travel Lane en (L 1) X
(b) Acres per Travel Lane n h (L2) X .
(c) Acres per Travel
1' by the number of pulls of each category in the
for the field.
# Lanes
# Lanes
X # Lanes
Acres
= Acres
Acres
Total CAVVM1*Wettable Acres for field (Sum: 8a .+ 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Dater

CAWMP Wettable Acre rGs LO4 ✓R i `:� Tmvding Gun Computrii nai Warksieet, 2-20-99
G� eye t a and Hose-avel r�g�Guw System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) Field Number (Identification)
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _[feet] Length of pu11(L 1)
# interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes jfeet] Length of pull(B)
4. Wetted Diameter [feet] From field data sheet
5. Spacing Hydrant Spacing [feet] (as percent of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane locatio
Travel Lane Length (LI) Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
► y(p (a) Acres start end of pull from Table _ 1 LE 7D Column S
1.76 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
{Pail Ler►gth1 [feet] X Wetted WidthQ [feet])143,560
— (c) Acres stop end of puil from Table Column
3. % Total acres for Travel Lane Length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
1� tl /
--�k Travel Lane Length (12) Interior or V Exterior (Lane/Hydrant) _
► ' (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 76 Column J
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L0
{Pull Length ZIQ [feet] X Wetted Width 7zo [feet])143,560
S (c) Acres stop end of puU from Table 1%_ i;-:r 70 Column J'_
Z 1 Z7 Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
" L1
1 Travel Lane Length (1.3) Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
�o (a) Acres start end of pull from Table - Column
ZZ(b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
{Pull Lengthy [feet] X Wetted Width Z7,o(feet)) / 43,560
g---�— (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
TAD otal acres for Travel Lane Length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the
field. Sure all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
ee
(a) Acres per Travel a Len 1) X # Lanes = Acres
S h� .
(b) Acres per Travel Lai ngth (L2) X #Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per Trave YLane Len (L3) X # Lanes = Acres
Total CAWMP Wettable A es for fie] (Sum: Sa + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:�,S""„"'�

CAW AP Wettable Acre
Traveling Gun Cow;atstiwW WorksicK 2-20.99
Hard Hose T eling u System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) Field Number (Identification)
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _[feet] Length of pull(L 1)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes __ _ - f feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes ,_[feet] Length of pull(B)
4. Wetted Diameter [feet] From field data sheet
5. Spacing Hydrant Spacing [feet] [as percent of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane locatio .
►' Travel Lane Length (U) Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from - Table p Column
Z,o u (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull Length29Z [feet] X Wetted Width ZZO [feet]) / 43,560
�---- (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Z; Total acres for Travel Lane Length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
---) Travel Lane Length (L2) Interior or Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
(Pull Length [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L2) (Sum: a + b + 0
Travel Lane Length (13) Interior or Exterior (Lane(Hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table -- Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull Length [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Travel Lane Length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the
field. Sum all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per Travel Lane Length,(L 1) #Lanes — Acres
(b) Acres per Travel Lane LengtW(L`) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per Travel C ength (LI) X # Lanes = Acres
Total CAWMP Wettable Acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:

C o.H�a��f►�� � works�t�e�
5
5 • " ' ►� �,,,w,r Of 4421 u la d-ed cj ajo,
bra vc l "r e Ef recltit kres
0,73
'• f� ''
Z, DLo
S" z(p
V
Y
10
+.
�,w
s+ o3
11
lr�
C
`/1 DZ
�
7vM
�J
r
yL
Tea l Cgw Mp
E e 4 i,j,,- Acye5
-7, Z7
�olo Azos
wiy
sj4/ 11
e� ' j,�e l rC, �a u+"a «►a j � kS ee- C.���eal L.

,' 67 43 p9a rtrr� ay m f60f�
Q 9p 6 i.. ,p !� i ^r c c`i � �i
1537 pry c 1 ��/yf 4` P°� p U ps `62T a , m o r, 1
�'53p- 1534 q( y R v, On pro l Ye� L? r
y (Fy R 1536 �538 543 `q gg�rs19-.r1 Da �h
153 r cOto+ :'n'c': ( .. w j A \' J x S4 `3 160 sm
M \ fqy /53.3 1529 F- {oACA UIPI f 162 3" aq� yap!
LIF
RA
V
.l-EV�UtiN l538 °-`�-. �� � i 160;`� -
1557 o yr Q 4
C011Ptijl 1c l53G4p''F New Hame rJ¢�o 14CR EYC�H.\ , °R 1633 �j ! !4' �' duEEN�g cx
y �K �, ! a GS ` O a ! z t.
vJ53 529 �PlAH SCH, pq r539 �' / 9H E RD. ?\ 1632 �{ 41. 1606P6�
ry`� ��Jspa'" r53 J 1004 p, I'6341' 1617
o MAN TA y `) , E
( DR 531
c C4SAR
,YFq 1519 J / r 1615
2'2fi" r a`�r 1 1529 0 1528 ay x Fc a�1 1i3i5 Qeo. 1E35 aFt� `��
s r ( J I yF �y 1563 518 d qE , �� e e r o
RD
yoo6/ " 1550 F� I p�N 4� r q����a�r4.Vpp 4ye I y.a' 1614 m�MP016!?
P,6,>r4 I0 SER DR. �q` " OR rb D, `` a a m 1636 \ qa G?G 16T0 ' 1 �4
CAS moo, y P1L 1!i0. % KE R ISJ7� /FP. RD. F
o \ r r l26 J512i4^(�J� "` Ra
�+F� 1637
y� 29 1525( � � 1N509 !7Fi15 4 a° ."f3�", moo. t 21-4 35 �.�, BL c
/ �,454P FOq I,524 4s . - 13R. o h T 9, `L ✓ ��/q ' \ ! 76 6n— a o �Gr �p4 q 100 --1678 �� / wrttrs a
O 13Y6 v!'` oL��v! 15223 RD. akef �( R°' r564 0���\ o XtIO- N - "� 7 oR �� 1612
r515 Q'�2Mt1
V `+ *11 E R I Lrr� 0 Cie c'
rr ��� 1379 y 1509 CIIuR \, RO ^ °sE �� 16 9 •r
p � cy K srLEx 1640 7J F 1 45 :r
15415'28
1378 LONDON n '° R0. 11 q 164"-7r.y"
M. �R LKETT 4�• ,,, 6RDo 9:3�9 3'6 13J, �-m4 ".
far:
-
1641LL
Nop` r ci l520` 'r f'.S ,;' ,� lcov yr- ON
OJHrcKs
662 oy spr,
/ 4 SAND HI 1662 RD
151D1 d IG po ' ��� 4 ~ Bu
a° 1387 ( J3 ,, Hat'L7 %oP+sos(r I m gHa r I RD.
c, Y : RD f - 1503 ~' ° �/ "r 1663 c
114571 1A00 9 g z
�qy 2 n�,„w p-ai. ILLE :,la 4 �`, �` .�4� o � 0
13871 { _� scH 3s1 J RDr� .. aL t� R�H°R.�
+ A AG>rGOAC ONE J5 9� g'2ti
30H1+' ' �qWE eq SIC HEtlCX2
137 R pp'.DEOR9E r' BEAY rDN,�c3 'N'19N 5�p G� , F
4 C YLALS J6�0
LEY. D1T 80s 6F D
fr8se6K7y} J8 1
SCR• ;+ +' • c o
1w ! 600 . 13b2 , i �O of ca 4.6 p „�� �L DALE r(( pf 2
1 ro v
`i3s1 r's. ° r ^i r8 x
7
:;. o-. Al O ,• 1$ Q ��$ ON y ��p�
�h
StN1852 rCS
PA3 uBB8e0 5
G4sJisT.
\ ' �•� �, .+ uHrD I364,. �1364 ROD,
b' �Nq 1358 ..o,`ti °� o ; r , ; T 182 0� RY �+ !8 1808
.. Campcc�l f3RIGG'eq 3 ' �o
RCD o,X M.ve DR �'F�is j s (8 4 WILES 1825
� 5 IL
A7TlNr0 Hu CH R g _ iP p SANOFy AC
iPQL 52 Eta �, — r
13 x o,`•� � ko• 7 Olt 1 � � sC a Ile f ��,' 1$24 S
'355 Y \ . r 35a �— T P. IS
!\ °o I J J1339257 3��°0��FeHE�VT�JI81h HE,iWNa. 6
0 REND R 349 RDM J826
Rr344 to a7
�
�.
" L�r Q,z 6- // 1 4 ° „ ietcalf � 4
135� 1348 13 ° c4 avf,\ WALLACE w !t
MP 1347 5 0� lB3J' I 1 RO• 2F�GROVER ¢,
4r = RrES R D A 1351 CK 'yel'- \ RD.
j�1327 13s BCyuRc $N o�JRN 9 �FR 13 . giaic -to3 jr y J82 18
11 bFy�h {� r3r3 I c ° DLEDR ZELA CH 1337 °y° RtDGEL
8'0 9 g F ao y' 1338 P `1343
c � /3 q o�
e !33
p f334 4 1336 (( �B �E1°' 13 3 r FR1 m
O L �m f40! 4Scp4 x �R4 a �d I 1 Lk O ¢ !8 wE 0 1 S i8 12'
Gfrw' RD R ° A� cP�� y r!' � ° c � 1 1840 1842
xa p �� 4 �, Kwom1841 b r
J33 y l333 r N �� t 1382 qy �P �� J3 0 ` 13a
44j�� ES
11 �2 r34r ��/ �/ sq E� 1850 +tom o o -e1
Ro, 4a 1323 syy `'r R vUE Rv- ya , w R y ja
rsl82T
1 0 to H11RRE;: R� �'� FP 1349 - no F+ O e ra`53

JRL-
m
I
!, �Jji
K'S
4

r —
CD 00 w C 00'
Filt r Ar a
FLUSH POND DESIGN DATA
Top of Dam Elev.. - 196.0 -
Bottom Elev. 185.0
Top " of Dare Width - 10'
'Bottom Dimensions - 30' X 30'
Inside Side Slopes" - 2.1
Outside Side Slopes - 3.1
Add 5% to dam height for settlement _
Top of Dam Inside Dimensions - 74' X 74'
CPP-_C vert
f a,
Scale 1'=60'
PRISMOIDAL METHOD
ORIGINAL SURFACE"
Orig-ground
FINAL SURFACE
final_ground
CUT COMPACTION FACTOR
0.00 X
FILL COMPACTION FACTOR 0.00 •% --
RAW CUT VOLUME
3212.56 CY
-RAW FILL VOLUME
2181.97 CY
4�
"
o

Bridges and Cook Dairy
Effective Area to be Irrigated: 48.66 Acres
Application Rate: 182 Gallons Per Minutes
Two Waste Storage Ponds - Capacity
Storage Period = 6 Months
Storage Capacity = 91,174 cult = 681,980 Gallons
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Per Year = 4,442 lbs. - Irrigated
Crop
'
Stage
Date
Waste
Applic.
Gallons
In Pond
(Estimated
months
storage
in ponds)
Lbs N
In Pond
Gallons
Irrigated
(Estimated
months
storage
irrigated)
Lbs N
Irrig.
N
Appl.
Rate
Min.
Acres
Needed
Gallons
Remain.
in Pond
N
Rama
InPo
Sg Silage
Harvest
May 1
Corn
Silage
Plant
May 15
681,980
2,221
681,980
2,221
165
14
0
0
(6 months)
(6 months)
Harvest
Sept 15
Sg Silage
Plant
Oct 15
568,317
1,851
340,990
1,111
40
28
227,
740
(5 months)
(3 months)
.
327
Topdress
Feb 15
�,
681,980
2,221
340,990
11111
70
16
340,
1,11
(6 months)
(3 months)
990
in.
zd
L

i
Bridges and Cook Dairy
Irrigation System
Hard Hose Traveling Dun
Tract 965, Fields 1A, 2A, 3A
Effective
Hydrant Lane Pull Length (ft) Acres
Distance From Edge
Of Field Marker (stake)
To Start Pull (ft)
H 1
A
23
0.93
165
H 2
H
260
2.06
150
H 3
C
950
5.15
150
H 3
D
950
5.26
325
H 4
E
950
5.03
150
H 4
F
950
5.03
425
H 5
G
945
5.00
150
H 5
H
950
5.03
525
H 6
1
933
5.02
150
H 6
J
668
3.74
535
H 7
K
290
2.27
150
H 7
L
241
1.68
Skip 400' after pull K
H 7
M
397
2.46
340
Total 48.66
Note: 1 meter = 3.281 feet
1 foot = 0.305 meters

L BRIDGES &COOK DAIRY
"SLURRY" WASTE STORAGE POND
ELEVATIONS
TOP DAM: 196.00
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY: 195.00
I
194.40
193.40 MAXIMUM LIQUID LEVEL
191.40
190.40
,. TOTAL DEPTH
1 ' OF,LIQUID 8.4 feet
BOTTOM POND: 185.00-

Bridges and Cook Dairy
Waste Storage Pond
"Slurry Pond"
Gallons
Depth of
Gallons
Feet Below.
Interval
Removed per
Remaining
Remaining
Elevations
Top Marker
Death
Interval
LLcoid Waste
In Pond
Top Marker 193.4
0
0
0
8.4
535,409
192.4
1.0'
1.0'
85,010
7.4
450,399
191.4
2.0'
1-.0'
78,749
6.4
371,650
190.4
3.0'
1.0'
72,731
5.4
298,919
189.4
4.0'
1.0'
66,951
4.4
231,968
188.4
5.0'
1.0
61,408
3.4
170,560
187.4
6.0'
1.0'
56,106
2.4
114,454
186.4
7.0'
1.0'
51,043
1.4
63,411
Bottom Pond 185.0
8.4'
1.4'
63,411
0
0
Total 535,409

4.�
Elevations
Bottom 12" 193.5
PVC Pipe
192.5
191.5
190.5
189.5
188 5
187.5
186.5
Bottom Pond 185.0
Bridges and Cook Dairy
Waste Storage Pond
"Flush Pond"
Feet From
Bottom Pine
0
1.0'
2.01
3.0'
4.0"
5.0'
6.0'
7.0,
8.5'
Gallons
Interval
Removed per
Death
Interval
0
0
1.0'
28,762
1.0'
25,171
1.0'
21,822
1.0'
18,710
1.0'
15,838
1.0'
13,205
1.0' 10,811
1.5' 12,252
Total 146,571
Depth of
Remaining
Gallons
Li id Waste
Remaining
8.5
146,571
7.5
117,809
6.5
92,638
5.5
70,816
4.5
52,106
3.5
36,268
2.5
23,063
1.5 12,252
0 0