130007_PERMIT FILE_20171231

11 r� '�a?" -w t._r: - , i. 3t � F •z.. 'a. - T F :� -..-' i ateOua'i.. � ��'s. r•: r, e5:.`L- � c- ?
Wlrty., a r �.z 1 }t ar ti. p � ,✓
Fac><I>tty Nutritier 3 O ` r ` 0,biVIsIon,of Soil end Water' Cogserval3on; ` te a
r..H.. t "Kii ! - no, Y.. � - q
Qt he
r`Agency r_
Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4 Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ,CQN� Region:
Farm Name: �`�' �j��1 .. ��COwner Email:
Owner Name: _ `'�` y Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: e j_ __ ___ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [=o �' `� Longitude: =o =' = 11
( 44�\- Jt cq�
Design f "Current '` Design Current _ -Design` 'Current" .
Swine Y Capacity Population Wet Poultry. Capacity ',Population Cattle 'Capacity, Population"
LJ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
'Other.
❑ Other
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ TurkeyPoints
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Q;Rg-Cow
EMairy
Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑Beef
Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that. reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes CN ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No"�NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No bQNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No N:�A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye
ElNA
[INE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o V�A
A El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structurq l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identiiier:
r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in,):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Y o NA [I NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA � NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need []Yes []No ❑ NA EINE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes []No ❑ NA UNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window []Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? - -
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination %❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA CINE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA El
NE
. r;,; :�i.•Y.w'?r 7'..ri�Yr� +1'i. .. �r :� - �`,`,y{¢,V�]f."r t �. -`{' a..s . .. Myri`v_!, +�t'y i s,"';,+nei�
�tE!i1'_ .iiH", Y .L.� _'�_ .��i _='�: • f4 .r'�^I'4 � hY��
- .. a:y�. Y y}W�,ev; ;?w 'i�
fi.C. 1f�ItY• �l,.iE"..
2..� -q ..may .,�,µ1 i•C'�3K .:i��
1-\a �.� �'.d.S�+Y �F
Reviewer/Ins ector Name "" , .;� ¢ : r� Jk� �, =;`t s "� r ;r ' *"
p F y.. �; � s w t. Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued
M

Facility Number: — _ Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NI,
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certif cation
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather C de
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Sr'. «{��. .i}r- 3.�-r' :LV E,`. i k�-.4.. i - �. �Zc i it 5 �:'_f"ij, i',v h 4` 'S -•.!. '',} i, RS Y}{ l si A
Additionai Comments'and/ortDrs►din S � �}�� ,� x; �' i. ^r :e-'> � '�.% "'���'�'"� ` � '�y=cHF'�
!^"
4
12128104

January 11, 2008
Joe Harris
Harris Dairy
1643 Pembrook Road
Harrisburg, NC 28075
Subject: Rescission of Animal Waste Permit
Certificate of Coverage No. AWC130007
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Harris:
Michael R Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
D
Jai 3 0 2008
-------------
NC DENR MRO
DWQ - Aquifer Protection
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit Certificate of
Coverage. Staff from the Mooresville Regional Office have confirmed that this Coverage is no
longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No.
AWC 130007 is rescinded, effective immediately.
If you again wish to operate an animal waste management system you must first apply for and
receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal waste
management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will subject the
responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day,
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 if it would be helpful to discuss
this matter further.
Sincerely,
oleen H. Sullins
CHS:tlbltjs
cc: Andrew Pitner, Mooreville Regional Office
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
AP5 Central Files
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
None la
J atura�fy
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Maii Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
InbEn t a mv.nDAeletaluality.org 512 N. Salisbury St. • Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An E*A Q p hrWAffirr v ive Action Em0byer-50-/6 % ded110% Post Carwrt;r raper

[Fwd: Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure]
Subject: [Fwd: Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure]
From: James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Date:: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:59:03 -0500
To: [e-mail]
fyi...
Jb
Subject: Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure
From: William McClellan <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:26:31 -0500
To: "James.B ealle@ncmail. net" <[e-mail]>
Mr. Bealle,
I am sending you the notification that Harris Dairy Farm 13-07 in Cabarrus County has started his waste pond
closure.
Soil samples and waste samples have been taken and Mr. Harris plans to start spreading as soon as possible.
Two new waste samples were
taken today and Mr. Harris will spread according to his waste closure plan.
Thanks,
Daniel McClellan
Cabarrus SWCD
704-920-3301
DISCLAIMER:
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James Bealle <iames.bealle(a),ncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
r
11 Content -Type: message/rfc822
Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure
Content -Encoding: 7bit
1 of 1 11/21/2007 12:59 PM

J
f Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 130007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC130007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Co=1jancg Inspectogn Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Moor „gville
Date of Visit: 05/16/2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM_ Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident ##:
Farm Name: Harris Dai[yInc.Owner Email:
Owner: Harris Dairy Inc_ Phone: [phone]
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' j7'42" Longitude: &Q°36'05"
From the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2 mile, Farm is
on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joe B Harris Operator Certification Number: 21594
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Joe B. Harris Phone., 704-455-2476
24 hour contact name Joe B. Harris Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspect
Inspector Signa
Secondary Insp
Inspection Summary:
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
ib
Phone:
Date: (� 16, 7
Page: 1

0
Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc
Inspection Dale: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 130007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 0
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1sle Pond WP1 18.00 48.00
Page: 2
�

a
r t Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Hams Dairy Inc Facility Number: 130007
Inspection Date: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $ Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
01111
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
❑
o
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
n
Q
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc Facility Number: 130007
inspection Date: 05/16t2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Cl
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 ibs.?
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift? D
Application outside of application area? Q
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
0
Plan(CAWMP)?
151 Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
0
■
❑
0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
Q
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q
■
Q
D
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
11
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc Facility Number; 130007
Inspection Date: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? n
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Q
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Q
Waste Analysis?
. ❑
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
❑'
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
i❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
❑ ■
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
Q ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ ❑
D
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
Q ■
❑
Other issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Q
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
0
■ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■ ❑
0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc Facility Number: 130007
Inspection Date: 05/1612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes Ma NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q 013
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? 0 0 Q
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 ■ Q
Page: 6

06-04-'07 11:26 FPOM-
7047956432
T-177 P001
F-754
715 Caherrus Avenue West; Concord, NC 28027-6214
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
To: raPs From:
Fax: Pages:
Phone:-
Re:
CC:
0 Urgent ❑ For Review G Please Comment ❑ Please Reply 0 Please Recycle
e Comments:
�Ar�� S free bool"d kx-v-'�

a
06-04-'07 11:26 FROM- 7047956432 T-177 P002 F-754
� WASTE POND/LAGOON FREEBOARD AND AVAILABLE STORAGE CAPACITY"
Permit
Owner
Operate
JMWMMMMM
FROM
1. Freeboard plus available storage capacity is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon/storagc pond
embanlanent and the level of liquid. Vor lagoons/storage ponds with spillways, the difference between the
level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should be recorded.
2_ Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded weekly in inches.
3. Recording rainfall in inches is highly recommended but not required unless specifically required as a
condition of the facility's animal waste management plan or permit.
4. Optional: Sketch your lagoon(s)/storage pond(s) and the direction the wastewater flows fi-om the houses to
the lagoons on the back.
NCi7ENR/DWQ: FbC2 form

�� ' -�, i ^� E ,h r �, .9��.�w'T.s:.xu,w �7•'+ «�Pt � . G?`�,u;�• ,agmk Wr-' �. .,.s, �,�,� •r �., �� � F
diDivialnn_nt Water !}utility w... rH.. ua ca�x
Y
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi , Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: fj a,/ 5- Region: MOM
Farm Name: r1 4 - Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ED o E Longitude: 0 0= 4
-°+] , S .lFt Z*
7;� 3( J- ;
G Desi
` q _� ]" r l� 4 ,:. - �l; 1 R�.y.�. 3+ { •
Design
Yam. ' t•i
a n p Current
- Curr0, y �� Design. Current, tier B z r hw ^\
.-• ',.,5 4
1{.
Swine Capacity
..,, is ` v x ..
Population, +f�'ti'et Poultry Population
{ .� Y l t... ,. ' h S
Y5Cattle F r Capacity" Population
�f >Cpacrty
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
ne
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
❑ Feeder to Finish
x ; �r : w
❑
i°-i
Farrow to Wean
I
„Dry Poultry
. ❑
Farrow to Feeder
-
- ❑ La ers
ITT] Farrow to Finish
4
❑ Gi3ts
N ❑ Nan -La ers
❑ Boars
El Pullets
'
}a r yr 3 <> ❑ Turke s
do.A'.''N`
Y ❑ TurkeyPuults
❑Other
❑ Other
a $'9
Number of Structures
�^ wfn z 7^,. r � .� ,, ,�„'S r rrt c 4 :? t� y k'ti ' ✓i �l � +�4� ":.,cr \. }� era ��3 :,3 � � Lt��r' ti
Dai Cow
Dai Calf
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ D Caw
❑ Non -Dal
❑ Beef Stocker
El -Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other.
,
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA " ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify. DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
I�,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection+ts�can.
Waste Collection & Treatment -
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes MkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 0--
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? []Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE .
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes DhNb ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
r
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �],No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
WE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
R$NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EE-NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination's
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[a NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
'7 No
❑ NA
[I NE
re. C 0,,j 5 eta r
5 0 U 0(
f � � Gt eat �4• �r a- � .saiG vw .
�l
1� C
Reviewer/Ins ector Name t�sa..n '° ;;'sl h.c?�,;� Phone:
p U�. ,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Gf,L, _ij ,�Date: /Z/%6 /0(
IZ128/04 - "Continued
E

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. E+id the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA hNE . .
❑ Yes- ❑ No ❑ NA OkNE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the' permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yesi
[RVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[9NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
.I NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[KNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
CANE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ME
❑ Yes 9INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
El NA
❑ NE
Yes
ElILT
,,+&�No
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
"K7 6V tit' 01 ev
.S' e'p t c G�(Ci ! • C.�Gt 5 !2% /mil O) �� d'i
12129104

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality,
October 1, 2004
pC i 9 2004
Harris Dairy Inc.
Harris Dairy Inc. MC rrc
1643 Pembrook Road am m'� YugA6-
Harrisburg NC 28075
InI�ORi i , 2. �n�:�ri'r10E
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWCI 30007
Harris Dairy Inc.
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cabarrus County
Dear Harris Dairy Inc.:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harris
Dairy Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC130007 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Harris Dairy Inc., located in Cabarrus County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keenins?
andmonitoringconditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc,us ;Vaturaliff
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215:6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ce's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Cabarrus County Health Department
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC130007
APS Central Files

r�
4
Type of Visit 99 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ARoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑Denied Access
Date of Visit: f; ' es Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: St4Y AAt F) f 3J ;ri r Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ .._ S 14'1�tP` S Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
L j Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 6 = Longitude: = ° ❑ d
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Fon-Layet--t—
a er '
I �i I 1
Dry Poultry
Non-L
Pullets
Poults
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
[� Dairy Cow
Oo
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
0 NE
❑ NA
55 NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —7
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: mAc •
Spillway?: N O
Designed Freeboard (in): 100
Observed Freeboard (in): 3S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No � NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) COILij
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
23 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. -Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VS No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name "�"f Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 05
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 173 — r7 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [K Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropiiate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[RNA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addit�onul Gomments.and/o`r Drawings + �� yf' }
r-*Cvv% has 6.4- }`i+r►s'41) rr f c+ r*5* Z-3 X46000. Mrt. is r�s
w +os wo f A.*f.& OF r+• q u Y i4 o,pjs . 45W a A's 4. 1- ®tl s.. �..rA-4 ow't µ.—As �-
C w•' I I $.
OFt..!ORk wA') a1rr... a.- P'sR rLA+�,/J �4S ;phi.+/ 100kr Va).
12128104

Michael F. Easley, Governor
r William G. Ross. Jr -Secretary
�+ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Akan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 27, 2003
Mr. Joe Hams
Harris Bros. Dairy
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, NC 28075
Subject: Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Harris:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 23,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be adequately operated and maintained.
It was also noted that improvement in record keeping had been made from the previous year.
However, the following deficiencies need to be addressed
• The storage pond embankments require general maintenance (mowing, etc.).
• On the waste application form the operator and facility information must be included.
• A copy of your permit and certification form must be available during the inspections.
A copy of the inspection report is enclosed. If you have any questions concerning the
report, .please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
PHONE [phone]
FAX (7D4) 663-6D40
Sincerely,
Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
116
ZDER
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

IF Division of. Water QualIty4,
Division of 5oi! ead Water Conservatio
O O'ther Agency;; '� .. -,r.v- ". :'.,• r„c:
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 07/23/2003 Time:
Facility Number 13 07
tp Not O erafional 0 Below "Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ... -..- ......
Farnt Name: Harms.Hatt'yAnc.................................................................... County: C�abArruS ............................... MQ........
Owner Name: I�CI�1?�IYKIAC.._.---------------------- Phone No: 794:455:�474._----------------------._._..
�tailirtg.address: �G.I'�nnbr.�a.t;,a�td........................................................................ I�latriiklttrg..P.?C................................................... 1.A�5..............
FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No: .......................
Onsite Representative: di21~.ARRGS_._._._._._•------_._----------._._--- Integrator: ---------------------------------------_-_-
Certified Oper•ator:J.9.p.B. ..................................... IjArrb ............................................... Operator Certification Number:21S .4 .............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2
mile. Farm is on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord. .—
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S • 17 42 Longitude 1 80 10 36 0-57
Current
awsuc
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feedei
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle capacity Population
❑ Layer 10 Dairy 200 120
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity200
Total SSLW ; 2809000
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagvon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Pond's / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar_1es & Strcam Int pacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obser�-ed, did it reach Water of the State'' (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. li'discharge is observed, what is the estimated ilm"' in -0min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
VVaste Collection &_'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 SU'ucture 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............. I. . ..-.2....-•--•-... .......................... ........................... ........................... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 24 22
t

V✓/V✓/VI
Facility Number: 13-07 Date of Inspection 07/23/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
N1'aste Anpiication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
® Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify -regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) I
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
-+*7we�,.:ap.. ws....hd^.r•m ," .. • r. - .. .. _ • _,. ... -.. •F,r..� .,+`s"!'rfi, an"^""I-..•-^tx •• rtS:•r. �wz.: •� •n ,d 4�� ""'+� ��a�4s
,Cammeuttid(retcr�to question #)� Ezplaln any YES answers andlor. any,recommeadaionti or any other comments: �: ;
�p m•�x«r¢ r _ . .. a:re....t.,�c ;��ss+:_.:is!' .i3-hF..
,Use drawin��gjs of flYacility1 to baea,�tter eipEain sifuatIans (useyadditianal page's�as necessary) ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes z ' �,
.'.
ry: "k �^.w3
.H�w'h:,�w+'vY.�.'F�Ysw- X'„��e .s3.�. ...h \ .G.'. Y`. .. �.hr,-�l h:IVr,.�.-.-n..-v-.r�.T�n....;w•.
---THE STORAGE POND EMBANKMENTS REQUIRE GENERL MAINTENANCE.
---DURING AN rNSPECTION THE PERMIT AND FARM CERTIFICATION FORM SHOULD ALSO BE AVAILABLE
---ALTHOUGH THERE WAS IMPROVEMENT IN THE WASTE APPLICATION RECORD KEEPING, INFORMATION SUCH AS
OPERATOR SIGNATURE, FACILITY NUMBER, ETC. SHOULD ALSO BE COMPLETED.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan 3ohson
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
v

0� W Ar�9IAch, rF.Easley
`DC� pG Governor
CO
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
?: ; r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Reaouross
Alan W. Kilrnek,' Director
.Division of Water Duality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 6, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL 7001 2510 0005 0288 0081
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Joe Harris
Harris Bros. Dairy
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, NC 28075
Subject: Notice of Violation
Inadequate Records/Files
Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007
Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Harris:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 5,
2002. Based upon the inspection and a review of your files, this letter is being issued as a Notice
of Violation (NOV) for the following violations:
• Failure to adequately keep a record of the weekly freeboard levels of the waste
storage ponds.
.• Failure to provide information regarding the annual soil analyses for the year 2001.
• Failure to conduct a waste analysis of the waste applied during the fall of 2001.
Failure to follow the'requirements of the certified farm plan and to maintain and provide
complete records is a .violation of Section Ill of your Certificate -of Coverage AWC 130007,
pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 OC.
It is requested that a written response be submitted by September 21, 2002 indicating
your actions to correct the noted violations. Please address your response to the attention of Mr.
Johnson. It is requested that your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as
the facility number.
N Aft
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresvfile, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

Page 2
Harris Bros.
By copy of this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local
District Soil and Water Conservation Service, DWQ is referring this facility for technical
assistance, if appropriate. if you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
o.
Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Cabarrus County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
File

Date of isit: 9/5/10112 Timc:
Facility Number 13 7
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered , Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ... __ __ _.....
Farm Name: Harris.DairxJAC......................................................... County.
. • UbAXTU5_._..................._.__.........
Owner Name:C=iS-------------_-_-- I?airy_IuC.._._._._._._------------- Phone No: 794:455=.4It-------------------------___--
Mailing Address: a.643,X.eMbrualj.RQmd........................................................................ Har.ris)"aurg.Ac .............................................. 7.80,75 ..............
FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No:......................................
Onsite Representative: �i21K�ARRLS-------------------------------------- Integrator:------------------------------_�-------
Certified Operator:JfD0L..................................... Hairris................................................ Operator Certification Number:2159.4...-...........
Location of Farm:
ram the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2
'le. Farm is on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 17 42 Longitude 80 • 36 QS
Design Current '7]esign -Cur_:rent Design _Cnrrent
Swine 'Ca aci Po elation Poultry -,Capacity Po elation Cattle Ca aci ':Po ttlation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑Layer ®Dairy 200 125
❑ Non -Layer ~� ❑ Non -Dairy I I'
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity ' 200
Totallssl ;w 280,000
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IS No
'Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ......--..Side. .......... ...........ICaC.......-........................... .............................
Freeboard (inches): 48 48

VJJ UJ/ V/
Facility Number: 13-7
Date of Inspection F 9/5/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
I.VIY�!lYGif
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Alfalfa Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
IN No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
® Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) -
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23..Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
#19) RECORD KEEPING NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED IN ALL AREAS. (FREEBOARD LEVEL, WASTE APPLICATIONS)
THE PUMP MARKER IN THE SIDE WASTE STORAGE PONDS NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED. THE MARKER SHOULD BE
THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT THE ANIMALS ARE KEPT ON THE LOT NEEDS TO BE REVISED IN THE WASTE
ANAGEMENT PLAN. THE PLAN INDICATES 18 HOURS/DAY. MR. HARRIS STATES THAT THE ANIMALS ARE ON THE
)T APPROXIMATELY 7 HOURSMAY.
ISSUED.
Reviewer/Inspector Name N
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: , "��

05103101 Condnaed
Facility Number: 13-7 Date of Inspection 9/5/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®'No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perrnanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
ALI

F WATE
`O�� 9pG Michael F, Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
> y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
co Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 9, 2002
Harris Dairy
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, Nc 28075
Subject: Operation Review/Compliance
Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Harris:
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder. the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified faun plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
M _
t8
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson/'
Environmental -Specialist II
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

o�oF W A rF9 pG
t7 �
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Harris Bros. Dairy
Joe Harris
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, NC 28075
Dear Mr. Harris:
l.�
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March 23, 2001
Subject: Notice of Violation/
Recommendation For Enforcement
Inadequate Records/Files
Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007
Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection
Cabarrus County, NC
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 16, 2001.
Based upon the inspection of the facility and a review of your files, this letter is being issued as a Notice
of Violation (NOV) with a Recommendation for Enforcement for the following violations:
• Failure to keep a record of the weekly freeboard levels of the waste storage ponds.
• Failure to provide information regarding the annual soil analyses for the year 2000.
+ Failure to conduct a waste analysis of the waste applied during the fall of 2000.
•. Failure to post the Emergency Action Plan and have in the file a copy of the required checklists
(insect control, mortality, and odor control).
• Failure to amend the waste utilization plan to indicate the crops and fields currently being utilized for
waste application.
• Failure to maintain adequate freeboard in the side waste storage pond.
• Failure to remove vegetation and trees from the embankment of the rear waste storage pond.
Failure to follow the requirements of the certified farm plan and to provide complete records
during an inspection is a violation of your Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007 and North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.10C.
If you have an explanation for the noted violations that you wish to present, please respond in
writing within ten (10) days following the receipt of this notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if
an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with
the enforcement package for his consideration. Please address your response to the attention of Mr.
Johnson. It is requested that your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as the
facility number.
l�.b�ENWR
tomer Service
:00 623-7748
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Page 2
Harris Bros.
Be advised that North Carolina General Statues provide for penalties of up to $25,000
per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and
regulations. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. If
you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone].
By copy of this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local
District Soil and Water Conservation Service, DWQ is referring this facility for technical
assistance, if appropriate. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Rex Gleaso /,P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Cabarrus County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
File

I
_ F .. . 4rid.•`ti;.— yea!,. .; _'r•, ._ _ _
�•+� ''� � � '� ,« _ i sion`iif �9ater.`Quality �;.,="•y: - _ � �- ��`t-.
Division of Soil "d Water C;onservation 4'}Rr�kc F . t ` S{�
'� 4 �fw i • 1� )74*t" J T
a;�Fh a ► .Sri .. f Nit _� i : s�r y
i'r� - r ? O Ot►lerAgencya--•:;{! :at . .,�il!::..r...:. r:
S+ + r 3...lfiRiC` e. ' r Nf
a c• yl
_ !e ,.,'�'•„'--t,�. �.. �'47i' }'11:. .:° rt _y.Y h•r�?.�'�.� ':v"E:s T..l� „yw :, .t..r.f .1..;. J � >�;��+: i• �.,,�. k...
Type of Visit -1P Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit �& Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilit),Number Date urvisit: [f�(vf Time: T �G'C�
Q Not 0 eratiotial 0 Rclon' Threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified © ConditionalIy Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold. ...............
Farm Name .! County:.. . .................................
OwnerName: .................1T s:f u L,...............h...z.................................................. Phone Vo:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: .Title: PhoneNo: .... ...............................................
Mailin Address: �fGG . � 7C�Gaw.... ,....I��C .................... �
g `1:.. cz.k. � x-� : �....� k r-�J....... ............I........ 2....... `..:.ZS`
Onsite representative ..................r.:..............�..c:. Iriiegra[or:
Certified Operator: .............._}.Q. ................................... Operator Certification Number: ........
Location of Farm:
Y
[I Swine [I Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude• Longitude • �u
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[] Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I IDairy o p
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ 13oars Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons JCI Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps E::= ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
Discharge originated ar. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min:'
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [�kNo
3'. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
01/01/01 rnrrlinrun.i

Date of Inspection
Facility Number:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
lkycs ,.,. No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Ident'stier: ......i.fC�.e ........ ;recrr...........................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): �.Z...1t_
...... .1..............4...............................................................................---_...........
. .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
Cl Yes
[�Aio
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
[rIyes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
, Yes
❑ No
Waste ,application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
4 No
l l . Is there evidence of over application'? Cl Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
,R No
12, Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWhiP)'?
Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
,a No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;My No
17,dkfe rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1.8. s there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
On -site ❑Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
Cl Yes
[ FNo
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes
❑ No
21, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
, Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[&No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
J"o
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
RNo
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
,&No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
6 No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
RNo
01 /01 /01 •
Continued
r� �

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Igo the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover?
Printed on: 1/I7/200I
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes b vo
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ❑ No
jU No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Com>Qierits:(Tefer to questiop #):=Exp ain any, -YES answeis'an or any. recommendations o� ariy;other. connrnents:'.:= r w'"
l ge'drawtngs of facilityto better explain situations {use additional pages as necessary}
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
' `1 led /2) Gl/'Gi r e; u ij e-
r CU 4 S ter A,
LO e,5te-- L.Ucc- 5 4j e c cti
�-�4,1 �r,-r- I VX �c .
4— jU v C�Aci i Y S e. 5
0C� ti Lip l I l`C'A�n
1--Cl l �}2c cv4�'rc.1 v � fL c�c._r tf'_<5£� r
�)VA
ac— �� �� � �'Lcl•��.- car` �t l� `�'�� �vLt e'r� e i7c c
Reviewer/Inspector Nance L-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 d
01/01/01

Facility Number --- Lagoon Number Lagoon identifier
0 Active 0 Inactive Latitude Longitude.
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HQW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
O less than 3o0 ft 0 30o ft - 1000 ft 0 greater than 1000 ft
O Yes 0 No
0<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes 0 No O Unknown
O Yes 0 No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown
44. Depth to Groundwater: 0 Unknown
45. Spillway? 0 Yes O No
46. Adequate Marker? • 0 Yes O No
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure? O Yes 0 No
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
j'

� MR '
JAMES S. HUNT
GOVERNOR _:: r.•
. ' VPAYNE,'NI CD>w V 1TS-";
SECRETARY r,• S^L'�`�1�•-
�Y
1 ,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OPFIGE
DNISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 19, 1998
Harris Dairy
1643 Pernbrook Rd.
Harrisburg, Nc'28075
Subject: Site Inspection
Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7
-Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Harris:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronoinic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
DID NORTH MAIN STR$ET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2611E
PHONE [phone]D FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

).
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogm_M Applac_ation for Common QLgps:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorgbum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 401bs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 601bs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where, the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil_ anaivgis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is nol going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who.apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
�1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Cabarrus SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

No.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
William E. Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Joe Harris
Harris Dairy Inc.
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, NC 28075
Dear Mr. Harris:
AM
.NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 3, 2000
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Inspection
Harris Dairy Inc.
Certificate of Coverage # 130007
Cabarrus County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
October 31, 2000. Based on his observations during the inspection this letter is being
issued as Notice of Deficiency for the following:
• Trees on the dam embankments. These need to be removed.
• Failure to keep a record of the storage ponds' freeboard levels.
In addition to the noted deficiencies, you should contact your technical specialist
regarding the construction of a permanent diversion at the push -off ramp for the side
storage pond. Also, you must be sure that the crops and fields receiving waste are listed
in the waste utilization plan. The fields and crops you identify on the waste application
forms should be in agreement with those listed in the plan.
Be advised that the following must also be available for review by the inspector
during the inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Three years of data (waste/soil analyses, waste application records).
• Emergency action plan, which must be posted.
• Insect, odor control, and mortality checklists must be completed.
a
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

Page 2
Harris
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
iYi . f.�rl•t, . � C..^�---
D. Rex. Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File

Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Alcompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit R'Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
' Cd n: 7/21/2000
' t)atc uP �� isit: (�' '"5 'r , ; Firuc: Pri�led u
Facility Number i
0 Nut O erational Q Below Threshold
13 Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Uate Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....................
Farm Name: 5 lJl..(.r. County:. Catr'rl?t...................................
A
OwnerName: ...................:I Tc.:. ...........................L.!� ........ .12 .................. I hone Na: ............l,l .....'. T ............................,
"{"
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:................................. Phone No:
.................:.............
,Mailing Address:..1��..�1F-3..........�t..:L`?PC ......................yl
lll. �:.( �t ll/.............
........ .
OnsiteRepresentative:....:. .c ................................................................ Intel;rator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: .. Operator Certification Number:f!
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �+ �•� Longitude �• ��«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder (❑ Laver ® Dairy /
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagmin Area 10 Spray hietd Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Diseharees S Stream Im act5
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
Discharge originated au ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischari c is observed, ryas the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the -State'! (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. II'dischargc is ubscrvcd. what is the estimalcd flow in gal/ruin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes B.No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters ofthe State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 91No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? E] Spillway
Struc:turc I
Structure 2 Structure Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
ffl�yes J�No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

�Facility Number: /Z _ Date u1' lnr-pectiun !Tinted On: 7/21/2000
5.• Are there an)' i�m-+m�-ediate threats to the integrily of any of the structures observed'? Oe/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes RNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? . ❑ Yes 16 No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes allo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes J4 No
Waste application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R�No
1 1. is there evidence of over appii::ation! ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Yes SNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Regards & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design. maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? fiel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility'require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
C7; K6'**iolaiigris o' t, &nc�, ien, Ne* -v;t=ere itafed- ditfi ig #his'visit: • Yott Will •reed,06 Rio; further - ;
.. • r rresD6Tidence. aboutthis visit • . • .-• . ' ................. ' .......... ' .... .
IF- +WNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
9Yes ❑ No
,'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes gj No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes Qg,�Jo
Yes ❑ No
,Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes B :No
❑ Yes ;EP-No
❑ Yes ) No
❑ Yes ►!TNo
❑ Yes E�Xo
❑ Yes trNo
Comments (refer to question #E): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations -or any other comments.
Use drawings of facHity to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
a�' � P�r� n e.v�� b tir+r��r 1 �t►JrXS ► o►� 5 �oa�`c�, ��. es�tis� �e �.
s � d>✓ pis k �� ,�-a.,,,,,,, .
trA, *r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector signature: /V Date: 5100

Facility Number: — Date of inspection �_� Printed on: 7/21/2000
Wor Is5ue5
6. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [RNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 4No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do _the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes RNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a` �
r t� � ' h C � ��v 1 V+� �l W � � ��
5100

State of North Carolina 'T
Department of Environment N. . 4 •
and Natural Resources XNM� N O MEN" HEALTY� �i►
Division of Water Quality;1A
- Riso RCES
JAN 24 2000
._James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor �_
Bill Holman, Secretary wrlsloR OF 6�YIRi2N1KfNTA1 MANA6EY
Kerr T. Stevens, Director aNpRES'" "IN Al B 41 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Fes{ ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL_ RESOURCES
January 19, 2000
HARRIS DAIRY INC.
1643 PEMBROOK ROAD
HARRISBURG NC 28075
Subject: Application No. AWC130007
Additional Information Request
Harris Dairy Inc.
Animal Waste Operation
Cabarrus County
Dear Joe B. Harris:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by February 18, 2000:
I. Please provide waste storage pond capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.) for the two
ponds at your facility. Be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard
classifications that may be applicable.
2. The irrigation parameters listed in your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) exceed current recommendations.
Irrigation events are to be listed in the WUP as the maximum application allowable for that soil type from
the time the pumps are turned on until the time they are shut off. The application events listed in your WUP
appear to be out of the Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this guide have not
been adjusted for the application of animal waste. It is currently recommended that total application
amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any soil type. If your application rates need to be
adjusted for the application of animal waste, please have your Technical Specialist revise your WUP to
reflect the appropriate application amount per event. If the rates exceed the recommended one inch, please
have your Technical Specialist justify the increased application rate in the narrative of your WUP.
3. Please provide the Operation and Maintenance Plans for this facility.
4. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented at this facility should be identified (check
the appropriate BMPs) on the Insect Control Checklist, on the Odor Control Checklist and on the Mortality
Management Checklist.
5. Please provide the Emergency Action Plan for this facility.
6. The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) submitted is for 160 head of dairy cows. The certification for your
facility is for 200 cows. Written in on your WUP is 200 but the WUP is still only for 160. Currently, the
permit can only be written for 160. Please indicate in your response to the above items what number you
would like to be permitted for. If it is more than 160, you will need to contact your technical specialist and
have your WUP revised to reflect the correct number of animals.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 13-0007
Joe B. Harris
Page 2
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
.-sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention a4the address below.. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before February 18; 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to,be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
Cabarrus SWCD

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Harris Dairy Inc.
Harris Dairy Inc.
1643 Pembrook Road
Harrisburg NC 28075
Dear -Harris Dairy Inc.:
e��
ANCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENViRONMEN7`AND NATURAL�UFES
December 30, 1999 q r1Art3t{wL >;�soUxc�ae
FJAN 10 M0
���I4�Hf.�Ili1�yAI1'�itAl 9Fft� tMHtt
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 13-7
Cabarrus County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for PIant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere
/
/'
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Cabamas County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Al7irmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

Stag of North Carolina
Department -of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr_, .Governor
William E. Holman, .Secretary
Harris Dairy
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, Nc 28075
Dear Mr. Harris:
NC*DENR
'NORTH C+r.OUNA DEF06RT► ENT OR
-ENviRowmewT AND Nal]RAL RESouRGES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 1, 1999
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7
Cabarrus County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 21,
1999. A copy of your plan should always be available for review during an inspection. Also, three years of
records must be on hand for review during an inspection.
Please note that during many of Mr. Johns_on's inspections he has noted that some farms.are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The following items
must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection:
• Certification forms.
Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number , usabletwettable acres (not necessarily total
acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan which must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of Violation
or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications should be made during the time the
crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days
prior to planting. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
P m1 G-cj,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal -Opportunity Affmnative Action Employes 50% recycleWll)%.post-consumer;paper

• - 13 Division of Soil and Water: Conseiryatio[i .',Opeiratior Review
„..: Division of Soil and,Water,Conservation.- Co'rnpliance;inspection t
Division of Water Quality = Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number late of lnspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Ig Not O erational 1 Date Last Operated:
� TT.�/./.a_ ... I
Farm Name: ...... 1.f6 ....................�r.lf`....1 `� C-......... ... ....................... County:........ r.. Felt .f�..................................
Owner Name ,( -� Phone No: yS 5�— Z*-) Iq
.r/I..S............. �..t.r.4...........rX�............................................................... .. ?... ,Z...`I l
Facility Contact: .............................................. :............................... Title• Phone No
Mailing Address:........ G..��3........... G-e!.',i..-krD.� ......... ................ ......1f f��.l.�... u.r,.. ............................... ...�%.7~
Onsite Representative: ................. Aae ...................... l.i`i.5................. Integrator:....................................................
.............................................
e
tied Operator:. ,�•,`�� .... Operator Certification Number:..,�j.,!5 ,,,,,,,•„... r...t. �............................tion of Farm:
...... ... ..... ................ .. ....
atitude Longitude 0
Design Current " . `. Design Current Design Current
,PSwine. ation attle' Capacity Population.'
❑ Wean to Feeder El Layer ❑ Dairy Z 3
❑ Feeder to Finish 1[:] Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
0 Gilts,
❑Boars :.:. Total SSLW "
;Number of Lagoons � . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon ID Spray liield Area
Holding -Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ii'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Struct rc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: •� Z r e,CC tr
Freeboard(inches): ..........r..`........................... ..�........................................... ..... ................................... ............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity. of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc)
❑ Yes
*0
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Mo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
............................
[:]Yes %�No
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes U[No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes *0
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes RNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes KNo
Waste ADnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
jjj'No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
KNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[:]Yes
05.L40
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
9Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[9 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
O'No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
14Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
KNo
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
04No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency,?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
yiQla>�it?�1js.o dgfcjeO;�'b4tedi� {�ls v�sXt► You :wii� ><•eeiyea fu>�tor;
correso oiideiki abb;6t this visit .
r #r�.7rqs�-. eexr uti - <s�t2xn �sr .. .- .W ar p€yRept 9lrw
C6imments (refer to q on #) Y ExplaaiWa ES answers an� r3any':`recommendations, or any ,other comments
[Use;drawings�offacil>it to better ex la ii:s§i uattons use addtttonal1 a es as.necessa., r, y _. : : P. ___ _ m _.,,v _ ��. __,. ,p S 3')r t r. �� tr,;1,
tf : �rv�.3 ✓� F�-tCc� `t'�Q�- `+'�'P �a�'vr� , �G�v\ t,�ccs y��' GL� o�,�b [� �
LAO C�_r vs'4',a +'y �m� a a V C" s P r r tn•:
e- {�►o- h 1 [�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ELNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes RNo
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes AM -No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes KNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yos RNo
3/23/99

,State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECTIPT REQUESTED
Harris Dairy Inc.
Harris Dairy Inc.
1643 Pembrook Road
Harrisburg NC 28075
Farm Number: 13 - 7
Dear Harris Dairy Inc.:
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsOURGEs
April 6, 1999 Uwe, Qr-
W4*. t
at•w
ApA 10 19M,
You are hereby notified that Harris Dairy Inc., in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm
has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 676 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone]
extension 364 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Zcerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

y�Y _
-y-a-416J
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 8, 1998
Harris Dairy
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, Nc 28075
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations .
Site Inspection Report
Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Harris:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May
6, 1998. You should be sure that the number of animals (160) in your waste utilization
plan agree with the number (200) stated in your certified plan. Also, the vegetation on
your storage pond at the rear of your facility should be cut.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cabarrus SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREE7, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX 704-663-SOAO
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

'
'j13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
MDtviston of Water Quality
,, r
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u 'of DWQ ins cction 0 Follow-up of DSWC review• 0 Other
Facility Number Date of inspection
Time of Inspection i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered r.9kertified 13 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 1E3 Not O er:►tional " Date Last Operated:
.--:­ r
Farm Name: ........ �q.n i-?........�r LLt __.y 4_-t L County:.......CCa,..k+.&.�!rl.�L....................................
Owner Name : / 14sr
............H.CLu'.y- t..5............... �.Y.�.�......�........ L................................ Phone No: ZI'll 7�...................... o r 2 3..
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ..............
la 3...... t�e.F►-►...r�, ......�..........rr..t...0 .......................................
Onsite Representative:........... .......... 1.4 L C..rI... I ....................................... integrator:......................................................................................
I
Certified Operator,....... ....... .............. Y' l 5................................ Operator Certification Number:.... !. .
Location of Farm:
...... .�r...........,...w�...... ..L............r...... ....�.. �...................................�..�.......w.......t.....� ..... j.......t...................-.........�..
. . ... . ... ... ff,, . ........
.�... 45_...... hY..Y►.....f'.,o hv....0L1..................
Latitude �' � L_LJ°� Longitude ®• (0
Design ' .,Current Design Current
Swine, Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population . Cattle „
❑ Wean to Feeder I0 Layer airy
❑ Feeder to Finish JCI Non -Layer I 1 ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish -Total Design Capacity]
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Design Current
Capacity Population
C)d
_v6
a S'01 0G�4
Number of Lagoons / Holding. Ponds,. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
3'.. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
l.,
General
❑ Yes 16 No
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes )No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? Of yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes XNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ANo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes NEANo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes *No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes '�_No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Y
Faocilitf 'umber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures I,a oon. 11oidin Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ;,f{.,Crt......
Freeboard(tt):............s.........................................,...................................................................................................,.,..
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of -adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes K No
Structure 6
........................................
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes P!�N'o
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes >ff No
❑ Yes 'No
I—N
....................................................
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PINo
❑ Yes ZjNo
Q No.violationS-or de'fi'cienCie's. Were-noted'durin ' this visit.- Nou4ill receive -no ftirther
correspondence about this'. visit'.-'.',
Jse nrawingsor.t"st
Ub was �.
stion*): tiplain arty AS answers and/or utiv recoii meiidattons or any other
py
to better explain situations."(use additional pages as•neccssa -y.:s
s �
;,- 1 rij p 146 ; s
K —M 6 tV5
de�e.
/,L"
far d OO � wa5 L
Aot. 4 coai�C�
gCc,o`&`7/ r
as1 t,ea.✓ .f C�f�c� �.o
yea r
uI; lrja�z'or p/ate r s
'}&e 4e c_� . sPe _1',,1 s
❑ Yes qM
f-141 No
❑ Yes `�No
❑ Yes �JJNO
❑ Yes K] No
❑ Yes `4 No
❑ Yes 'INo
❑ Yes Wo
-r,m-
f 13 OAJ t~
_5
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name "~
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
• Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W, Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Harris Dairy Inc.
Harris Dairy Inc.
1643 Pembrook Road
Harrisburg NC 28075
Dear Mr. Dairy Inc.:
1DEHNFZ
N.C. DEP'r. op
ENVIRONMENT, ItFAI,'rIX
& NATURAL Rl WC1tJ,tCt S
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DEC 17 1996
Facility: Harris Dairy Inc.
Facility ID #: 13-7 DIVISION OF ENVIR011H NTliI IIANAGELIENT
Cabarms County NOLIRESKU RERIONAE OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners'and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate ari
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System P6. Voice'919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresvilie'Regional Office 0
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ... t,
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary IDEEHNF;Z
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
MARCH 19, 1997
Joe Hams
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, NC 28075
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Harris Farm, Facility #: 13-7
Cabamis County, NC
Dear Mr. Hams:
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on March 7, 1997 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
The runoff from the back lot needs to be collected in some manner rather than diverted down the side of
your application field. Please bring this to the attention of the Natural Resources Conservation Service
specialist who is working with you on developing your farm plan for the certification process.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also,
please be advised that North, Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day
per violation as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental laws and regulations. If
you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gle on, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Cabamis SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
T. ,
919 North Main Street, I *C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

x t
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review `
p fi DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
toutine 0 Cam laint 0 Follow-ue of DWQ ins ection G Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: __ Qec� r 3..Tic�.„ . ..... _._...„ _ ....._......
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection I f = `f 5' I Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel, and processing)
FarmName: _ . L.C...S� .„ _..„_ ....._..... _ »..»...„r .... County:.--..C.�L.S.._.„......_..».......».»...._..
Owner Name:._ »� ._ ..14—)./!` ....._ „... ..__ _... _.... Phone No . 5'��..�.. � ........... _ ._......._..
Mailing
OnsiteRepresentative: _ » .v �rk .„ ..... _ ..........„»...„ ..... Integrator: ........... . . ..... . ...... ....__.....„„...._„
Certified Operator: _.. _ ...a ... _..... fL�.�...._.._._. „._.„ » „._ Operator Certification Number: _ .... .......... ........ ._......
„ ...
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 6 ram" Longitude �• �� �« Kpdc-1 ta'd
Cl Not Operational Date Last Operated:..»„„.�,.`�`re...� .._.........._.„_ ...._ ...„._.„_ ......._.......„.........__....
of Vperation anti
rbwme Number.:;
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
-: �YPoultry ; Number ,t ° ` •Cattle,
❑ La er
,:
Da'
❑ Non -Traver
Beef
❑ Other Type of Livestock
;
F f
❑ Subsurface Drains Present xh
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds � � �.
Y-
r A �� g ` r` < , ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
!Cieneral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ENo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®.Yes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes (9 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ERNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons and/or lioldinrt Pands)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (h): La 02 1 M La on 2 r� Lagoon 3
ff ....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Annlication Allk
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(1f in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .r G,15 kL !? Gt.r. ..... Cow .... .....
_ ..._ ....__..... .....__.._._r ....» ....
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only A/l
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes 25.1No
❑Yes .E.No
❑ Yes 5ZNo
❑ Yes [RNo
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 19No
,Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R°o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments"
Use dmivings-of facility;to bette'r.explain'situations. {use additional,pages
`nte�_e. is b)as�e, ;n� d4 Az- .e_ pczjP_ . aw-Loc�_, b,_�
irtt-a (0,300n. r { l
�l e Y e 15 1' kn a vyx Tln� (a Q L IG `LST W to �' G Nt Q e 5 I Yee C OI1 ECr��
ILL SDvVt@ WLC�hv���. ` 1C S"r-Y0.
`2v.��y d1►� IS h���ng Cl�\1f' ��1 b�f (� 1
s to C� 0, U ca _I olk i Clc�
Iv`\-0 A OOCI @Jtll C1`�r�o� ,
Reriewer/lospector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
yr "443ion of n arer Quahr)-, water Quatiry aection, t acimy Assessment Unit
11 /14/96

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.)?) -
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:, 1995
Time: 1 I : 00
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County: CA,b0.-yiAAp, Integrator Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: M
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation:Swine—Poultry_Cattle Design Capacity:JbDNumber of Animals on Site:, u
Latitude: 0 Longitude: a
Elevation: Feet
3 5 19 Z $a 36
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have suffi ' nt freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 4 hour storm event
ar NO i 0 In �i,Qs ( Lar�tr
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) �e or o Actual Freeboazd:� t�Inches (5�►,al rev
Was any seepage observed from the Iagoon(s)?
70-$0 C% nQA t—
Is adequate land available for spray? 5e or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Yes or&i Was any erosion observed? Yes oi�i
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings, Ye or No
100 Feet from Wells? G or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or®
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o NzDoo
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes
� �
J •� i l�iJ\1.� ' � • . �.h.t� �..I
Inspector Name 4m Signature ► �e�,�
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • Mooresville Regional Office • 0
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDEHNF;Z
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Harris Dairy
1643 Fembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, Nc 28075
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Harris:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, faun your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main 5trest N%OCAn
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Caroline 28115 Eciucl Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 7C4-663-1699 50%. recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Cabarrus SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D.�eX'C o
Water Quali egional Supervisor

�0F WArF9
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross. Jr -Secretary
> -1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
_ Alan W. VJimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 27, 2003
Mr. Joe Harris
Harris Bros. Dairy
1643 Pembrook Rd.
Harrisburg, NC 28075
Subject: Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Harris:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 23,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be adequately operated and maintained.
It was also noted that improvement in record keeping had been made from the previous year.
However, the following deficiencies need to be addressed
• The storage pond embankments require general maintenance (mowing, etc.).
• On the waste application form the operator and facility information must be included.
• A copy of your permit and certification form must be available during the inspections.
A copy of the inspection report is enclosed. If you have any questions concerning the
report,.please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�)' F�-C-
Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
,:,DEN
Mooresville Regional ice. 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone] 623-7748

ati �+++[+:,ry�`'�r^h'�;3`"W'�'a�'k✓�}w'� Divisiaa b[WaterQtsaltty .- .��.�.;�, a��_ �a y�'` `�'�.v �' �f�•� �s
�s-f�W"�F, "CPF�Jrkti �y..JJ�+,.;iq^�•�7" •-.rr.•_. - �-;:.. ^' -�"" --• L 7 -.� n - y�h�+�5�;�,5 t,ar ^���Sr� .{h7 -T.
,� +�, �,..r; R � ,�:. � �,, �, � a,; Q Division o[ Soil and Water Conservation+� �. - � ���,.��� � � �.� s•
c� i �� "�` �,>-'�^s:-��.'� 3 Y fit' r '� � Other•Agetney : ,..:..__. '; .: •, _ :". � -.t: ,a-I"v' ��. � �t� �wr� .
...�--.....t:�'Lt..zw.�.'!S�c�cz"�7'*�..�-�'��� ��•: ., ... _ w _ .�:>•r . ..r .� '.r: - :,. ,a�.,Y.�r : �-t ��:?-�`fi£�.t..sr<.�.Y'��. ��`4-t<W..::.
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date o1' Visit: b7/23/2t3t13 Tinte:
E Facility Number 13 07
NNol O leradonal Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........... _.
Farm Name: HarriS.Airy.J.III........................... ............................. County: CAbAXr-us................................ 11MQ........
Owner Name: Aat;ii�I2ail)_Iit>:,._.----------------_-__-- Phone No:
(Mailing Address: 1041ftimbr.ulp.RoAd........................................................................ Harrisbure.AC .................................................... IOU ..............
FacilityContact:...........................................................`Titie:............................................... Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: dS2F{$ARRiS-----------------------•-------------- Iniegralor:.----------------------------------------..
Certified Operator: �cD....... ............................... arx�s................................................ Operator Certification Number-21SQ................4 .............
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2
mile. Farm is on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord.
❑ 5wine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F3579 17F 427.. Longitude 80 ' 36 OS
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
JE1 Layer
10 Dairy
1 200 1 120
❑ Feeder to Finish
JE1 Non -Layer
I JE3 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity_
200
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
_•,
Total SSLW.
280,000
Number o[Lagoons 2 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Diseharees S Slre:tau Im� )t acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach N ater of the State'' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. ►%'hat is the estimated flea• in =al/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DVVQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ 1............. ............ 2............ -------------•--•--•--•-•............... ............ ........................... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 24 22
AC in 2 An r r..».s..... r

vJiv✓ivy a.,urenurr�u .y
Facility Number: 13-07 Date of Inspection 07/23/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
\Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
,}yr.r..,,y .�ion�r ..:-:.. P.. s. - ..�. .w. si'- .. ..:.. k 4+.. - . ti?w'=ht..7.,K..S. S'i�f:�YjV•�Y.�'�
C mme (refernto quest_#) ' Explain,any YES:Sanswersiandl. .ar_any recomme?ndations orany other comme
Use drawings of facW�to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) tyk'Field
"�} - Copy ElFinal Notes
0
•'fin x� s�Ir ..?ter w t'+t' *r, ', e _:r-air k L
�^!irw^-�.ti 5F4i �` Y'1 '�� py
.S;�f��l�'f5 t� •r .i. 'Gi. a'4.f � ':'1 NVF r.Y.: h_...-dS .
---THE STORAGE POND EMBANKMENTS REQUIRE GENERL MAINTENANCE.
---DURING AN INSPECTION THE PERMIT AND FARM CERTIFICATION FORM SHOULD ALSO BE AVAILABLE
---ALTHOUGH THERE WAS IMPROVEMENT rN THE WASTE APPLICATION RECORD KEEPING, INFORMATION SUCH AS
OPERATOR SIGNATURE, FACILITY NUMBER, ETC. SHOULD ALSO BE COMPLETED.
ReviewerlInspector Name Alan Johson
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date:

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of EmAIG r AW L%WtqNbN oW s
t'JOOk v b VKI mAkFP0VR0W11r
,wA_ LppIl
May 1, 2003
Harris Dairy Inc.
Harris Dairy. Inc.
1643 Pembrook Road
Harrisburg NC 28075
WAY f 9 2003
r ,
WATER MIA 8��'�
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC130007
Harris Dairy Inc.
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cabarrus County
Dear Harris Dairy Inc.:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harris
Dairy Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC130007 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Harris Dairy Inc., located in Cabarrus County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, 'and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization PIan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with ail applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permttee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.'
wERNR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2c.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone] .
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP miy result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish _to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, F.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Cabarrus County Health Department
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC130007
NDPU Files

ANIMAL WASTE_ UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: JOE B. HARRIS
Location: 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD
HARRISBURG, NC 28075
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Dairy Milk Cows
Number of Animals: 200 head
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure: Waste Storage Structure
Application Method: Irrigation and Broadcast
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are needed so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre
annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is
not allowed under DEM regulations.
Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwin SIVEID
problems. NA njjAt.r .
Nonaso1ome Pemooa

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied
not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The established acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made,
which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area
receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content range for
specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A
NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by, the Environmental Management Conunission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER 60 DAYS (gallons)
200 hd x 7749 gal/hd/yr x 60 days/ 365 days/yrl8 hrs on lot/24 hrs/day = 191,072 gals/60 days
WASTE WATER PER 60 DAYS (gallons)
800 gal/day x 60 days = 48,000 gals / 60 days
NORMAL RUNOFF (gallons)
(Both Ponds)
0.2 ac x 7.49" = 1.5 ac-in / 12"/ft = 0.13 ac-ft x 43,560 ft'/ac = 5438 ft'
5438 ft x 7.48 gal/ft' = 40,676 gals / 60 days
HEAVIEST 2 MONTHS OF RAINFALL (gallons)
(Both Ponds)
9.3" Rain — 6.7" Evap = 2.6" / 12"per ft. = 0.22 ft x 12,589 W S.A. = 2770 ft'
2770 ft' x 7.48 gal/ ft= 20,720 gals / 60 days
VOLUME OF 25 YEAR / 24 HOUR STORM EVENT (gallons)
Runoff Area (Both Ponds)
5.8" x 0.2 ac / 12"per ft. = 0.1 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft3 / ac-ft. = 4211 ft' = 31,497 gals / 60 days
Pond Suface Area (Both Ponds)
6.0" x 0.29 ac / 12"per ft. = 0.145 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft / ac-ft. = 6316 ft' = 47,245 gals / 60 days

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL WASTE STORAGE NEEDED PER 60 DAYS (gallons)
191,072 gals A.W. + 48,000 gals Parlor + 40,676 gals R.O. + 20,720 gals Precip. +
31,497 gals 25.24 R.O. + 47,245 gals 25/24 Pond S.A. = 379,210 gals
Pond 1
Pond 2
TOTAL "AS BUILT" STORAGE AVAILABLE (gallons)'
15,000 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 112,200 gallons
37,225 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 278,443 gallons
Total = 390,643 gallons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
379,210 gals / 60 days x 365 days / year x 4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal.* = 9458 lbs. N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil
type and surface application.
*4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal represents highest level of the three most recent waste analysis.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1. ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER:
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BU.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
309
la
IdA
PASTURE
4.0
30
12.5
1500
MAR-
EnB
Fescue
JUNE
Ch
SEPT-
DEC
309
lc
IdA
CORN SIL
17
10
16.4
2788
APR-
MeB
iJULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
2009
MAY-
JULY
309
ld
IdA
CORN SIL
20
10
17.6
3520
APR-
Ch
JULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
2156
MAY-
JULY
309
2
IdA
CORN SIL
17
10
52.3
8891
APR-
EnB
JULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
6407
MAY-
JULY
309
3a
IdA
CORN SIL
17
10
14.6
2482
APR-
EnB
JULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
1789
MAY-
JULY
309
3b
IdA
FESCUE
3.5
40
6.6
924
MAR-
EnB
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
309
4
EnB
PASTURE
3.3
30
25.9
2564
MAR-
EnD
Fescue
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
309
12
IdA
PASTURE
3.5
30
24.9
2615
MAR-
EnB
FESCUE
DUNE
SEPT-
DEC
387
1 a
CoD
MATUA
9.0
45
3.9
1539
MAR-
MeD
Hay
JUKE
CoB
SEPT-
DEC
387
1 b
CoB
CORN SIL
23
10
12.3
2829
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1937
MAY-
JULY

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BU.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
387
4
CoB
CORN SIL
23
10
4.0
1495
APR-
CoD
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1024
MAY-
JULY
BA EY
60
1.4
546
SEPT--
NOV
FEB-
APR
388
1 a
Ch
ALFALFA
0
15.0
NIA
MeD
FoB
CORN SIL
20
10
3000
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
2363
MAY-
JULY
388
1 b
MeD
FESCUE
4.5
40
3.4
612
MAR-
MeB
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
1 c
Ch
CORN SIL
22
10
5.8
1276
APR-
MeD
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
914
MAY-
JULY
388_
2a
EoB
FESCUE
4.5
40
3.0
540
MAR -
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
2b
EoB
CORN SIL
22
10
9.0
1980
APR-
Ch
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1418
MAY-
JULY
388
3
MeD
PASTURE
4.5
30
3.6
486
MAR-
Ch
Fescue
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
4a
MeD
CORN SIL
22
10
7.9
1738
APR-
Ch
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1244
MAY-
JULY
RYE
6.0
40
1896
SEPT-
NOV

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
FEB-
APR
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BU.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
388
4b
Ch
MATUA
9.0
45
4.9
1985
MAR -
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
4c
MeD
PASTURE
4.5
30
4.2
567
MAR-
CoD
Fescue
.TUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
5a
CoB
MATUA
9.0
45
0.8
324
MAR -
Hay
DUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
5b
CoB
CORN SIL
23
10
2.7
621
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
425
MAY-
JULY
BARLEY
45
1.4
170
SEPT-
NOV
FEB-
APR
388
6
CoB
MATUA
9.0
45
6.2
2511
MAR-
CoD
Hay
JUNE
SEPT_
DEC
388
7
PoF
PASTURE
4.0
30
7.2
864
MAR-
PcE3
Fescue
JUNE
Ch
SEPT-
DEC
388
8
Ch
PASTURE
4.5
30
10.5.
1418
MAR -
Fescue
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
9
Ch
CORN SIL
28
10
7.4
2072
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
55
3.5
1425
MAY-
JULY

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BU.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
389
3
CoB
CORN SIL
23
10
12.9
2967
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
2032
MAY-
JULY
BARLEY
45
1.4
813
SEPT-
NOV
FEB-
APR
5599
1
IdB
CORN SIL
17
10
32.8
5576
APR-
IdA
JULY
MeB
SOYBEAN
32
3.5
3674
MAY-
JULY
TOTAL:
329.2 1
45314
* Acreage may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding (i.e. interplanted) or winter
annuals following summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the
N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of
North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses nitrogen.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in table above:
Crop RYE (Realistic Yield) unit _ lbs N per yield unit
Corn Silage ton/acre 10 lbs/ton
Soybeans
Barley
Pasture (grazed)
Pasture (hay)
Matua Grass (hay)
NITROGEN PRODUCED:
NITROGEN USED (AV):
bushel/acre
3.5 Ibs/bu
bushellacre
1.4 lb/bu
ton/acre
30 lbs/ton
ton/acre
401bs/ton
ton/acre
45 lbs/ton
9,458 LBS
45,314 __LBS
***BALANCE -37,344 LBS
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize,the animal waste N
produced. A negative number indicates more N needed than supplied by the waste.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SEE ATTACHED MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION
OF ANIMAL WASTE.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Your facility has been determined to have a waste holding capacity for 60 days of temporary
storage with a maximum of 200 head of cattle. The temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 2 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste stored in your
structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event
of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the application
equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in table 1. Failure to
apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen may make this plan invalid. Call your
technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Animal waste disposal will be completed by two methods, irrigation and broadcast application
for this dairy operation. The irrigation system is a traveling gun operation and irrigates Tract
388, fields 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and Tract 387, fields 1, and 4. The farm operation has a
3300 gallon Slurry -Tank applicator. The remaining fields listed in table I will receive waste
through broadcast applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content,
soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should
not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate
the acres shown in the table of acres owned by the producer. Failure -to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may make this plan invalid.
The irrigation system consist of one traveling gun operating at one time. At no time will the
application amount of waste water exceed more than one inch of waste water applied during the
application cycle. See table 2 for maximum application rates.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY SLURRY TANK
The operator has a 3300 gallon Slurry Tank applicator and will use this to apply animal waste on
fields not covered by the traveling gun irrigation system. Effective utilization of maure is not

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a given area. For proper calibration
of manure spreader, see attached information sheet.
Table 2. Maximum application rates for traveling gun system.
Tract
Field
Acres
Inches/ Hr
MaxJ Cycle
(inches)
Max. Amt/
Cycle (ac.-in.)
387
la
9.0
0.30
0.90
8.1
387
lb
12.3
0.30
0.90
11.0
387
4
4.0
0.30
0.90
3.6
388
la
15.0
0.20
0.60
9.0
388
lb
3.4
0.20
0.60
2.0
388
lc
5.8
0.35
0.70
4.0
388
2a
3.0
0.2
0.60
1.8
388
2b
9.0
0.20
0.60
5.4
388
3
3.6
0.35
0.70
2.5
388
4a
7.9
0.35
0.70
'5.5
388
4b
49
0.35
0.70
3.4
388
4c
4.2
0.30
0.90
3.7
388
5a
0.8
0.30
0.90
0.8
388
5b
2.7
0.30
0.90
0.8
388
6
6.2
0.30
0.90
5.5
388
7
7.2
0.20
0.60
4.3
388
8
10.5
0.35
0.70
7.3
388
9
7.4
0.35
0.70
1.6
Total
80.3 ai
MANAGEMENT OF WASTE APPLICATION
No matter what method is used., waste is to be applied to crops and/or pasture during the growing
season when needed for nitrogen benefits or as needed for irrigation water as long as nitrogen
limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded.
The waste storage pond levels will be pumped down prior to December to allow storage during
the winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively
growing to take up nutrients. The waste is to be applied to the fields and crops listed in Table 1
within the nitrogen limits listed. Waste will not be applied in such a manner that results in waste
runoff or over application of nutrients.
Application rates must be based on current waste analysis and applied to actively growing crops.
Waste must be analyzed as close to the time of each application as practical and at least within 60
days (before or after) of the date of application. Additionally, a representative Soil Fertility
Analysis shall be conducted annually on each application site receiving animal waste. The

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
results of these test shall be maintained on file for a minimum of three years. Proper records,
including maintenance, repair and irrigation (waste application) records, shall also be maintained
on site and in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells or within 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the farm operator. Animal waste shall be applied in a manner not to
reach other property and public rights -of -ways by runoff or drift.
The Division of Water Quality Regional Office in Mooresville will be notified at 704-663-1699
as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters.
b. Spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting animal waste to the
application sites which results in, or may result in, a discharge to surface waters.
c. Any deterioration or leak in a storage pond.
d. Failure to maintain adequate storage capacity in a storage pond that poses an immediate
threat to public health or the environment.
e. Overspraying animal waste either in excess of the limits set forth in this plan or where
runoff enters waters of the State.
f. Any discharge that bypasses a a storage pond.
Also, refer to Required Specifications, Irrigation Calibration, and Waste Sampling. (attached)

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Name of Farm: HARRIS DAIRY
Faciliv Number: 13-7
Owner/Manner Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to
be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this
system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil
and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: JOE B. HARRIS
Signature: Dater 31 r0 d o
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Date:
KEN COUCH
Resource Conservation Specialist
Cabarrus SWCD
Certified By: MATTHEW J. KINANE
Affiliation: USDA-NRCS Phone No.: 704-788-2107
Address (Agency): 715 CABARRUS AVENUE WEST
CONCORD, NC 28027
Signature: a{- Date: o3 of I a boc,

State of North Carolina
Department of EnvironmentN: ` •
and Natural Resources " -
Division of Water Quality I)SEP
g
1999
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 41VINOP -
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
gz
NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 31, 1999
HARRIS DAIRY INC.
1643 PEMBROOK ROAD
HARRISBURG NC 28075
Attn: Joe B. Harris
Subject: Application No. AWC130007
Additional Information Request
Harris Dairy Inc.
Animal Waste Operation
Cabarrus County
Dear Joe B. Harris:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has received your application for the General Permit for Animal Waste. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by September 30, 1999:
Please see the attached page of required items. We will need these in order to issue your permit. Please
contact your technical specialist if you need help locating some of these items.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, .
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before September 30, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request or feel that you may need additional time to gather the information, please
call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Moo resville-Regional.Office, Water-Quality-O
Permit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27626-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
HARRIS DAIRY INC.
ATTN: JOE B. HARRIS
1643 PEMBROOK ROAD
HARRISBURG NC 28075
Dear Joe B. Harris:
ffl:F;V,A
IT 0 0
A&4 2
__ !Ll ���
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTQIPjVftQRbL RESOURCES
JV 41YtyE�PL: �sr
September 19, 20001�
®p — �oo�
b�pQ �i,�Qq
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No: AWC130007
Harris Dairy Inc.
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cabarrus County
In accordance with your application received on June 18, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harris Dairy Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Harris Dairy Inc. Farm, located in Cabarrus
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 200 Dairy cows and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). .
The COC shall be effective from the date of is until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC130007 ,
Harris Dairy Inc. /
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
infonnation on this process. Unless such a. request is made within 30 days, this COC shall, be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
i 'L-14
err T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
CabarrusCounty Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

�—�- Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
l P!caie '.vice or oritit all intitrm-.a6sn Ulm Joe-i Mot re:fulre a it•:".;Wir_
Exiscin_- or New or Expanded (oiease circle one)
{;eneral fnformation:
Name of Farm: k�dlSt 2`11 �,uC : „,Facility `o:,r--�
Owner (s) Name: Six. Phone `o: ID - -42g7
Tailing address: gnq_� kiC
C28,015-
Farrn Loc_7rion: County Farm is located in:
Latitude and LonUicude: IL
Integrator:
P?ease attach a cocy of a counLy road ma4 with location iddriciaied. and describe beiow (Be specific: road
t
names. diraccions. milepost. e.c.): H- (Otj (,<,
p lilt fZO[� t�- 42� - -
Operation Descriotion:
ype o%swine tVo. ofAttirnals
Zi Wean to Feeder
Z Feeder to Finish
D Farrow to Wean
.D yarrow to Feeder
•D Farrow to Finish
D Gilts
Z Boars
T% f �k�tilnais ripe or Carrie :Vo. gfArtimals
�, ..,. M�Dairy _ a�
Z Pullets :I Beef
'Viunher of Animals:
Ntr .nt..:ha T,' Loop pliarico Ent
j 1 {
a
�re.zotrs:Desi nxCaaacr.. •v: �`?-�-��-��•rlrldiridn'a�.D'esr�n:'Cisrlacrrt::�:�=>�: .`"�..<. �'oral. Desi2mCi�rbacrt�...°�':..��.k •,;>• ...
acreage available for application: Required .acreage: 028
.N'umber of Lagoons I Storage Ponds: 2 Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: ITS or (a (please circle one)
I.f YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
sAaxxxseµrr�i�si�a��k��s�a:�ai�sief a!��a as a��s��n�ia ra �l n�xia wa i�f�i�s+,asys4a+aw aL sw a�s�arxia xi,,.ki.. a�wx Mae�si�x a�xr,�a.�ies+s�rs iaia fk r.�ie aria f�ila Hip i�i.. *r
Owner I Mana;er areetnent
[ (eve) veri[v that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changin_,. I (ire) understand cite operation
and mainccnance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named' above and will
implement these procedures. i (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capuc:ity of the :waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Manase:nent before the necv animals are stocked. [ (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or froth a storm event less severe than the 25-vear. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. [ (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Consmadon Sar.ice. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and water Cunservadon District. [ (we) know chat any modifecadon
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DE`[ or a new certificadon (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a It le transfe.,/.�
N'a ne of Land Owner ct� !i /✓ ti �l�
Si;nature: v - once: _1.2.-;1.2„ 7
r
r':lrrte of ti( s,er(ii ciit e:e tc [corn owndr): ..ra .1J- /7/QY f�,S
Sig,nncure: -
T
AWC -- Nu-u,t t. 1910 t

Technica-1 Specialist Certification
L AA a WC.'Inical specialist de,ignawd by aw Norfh Carolina Soil and water Cunser:attun Conimissiorl psirsuant
,NC.-\C 6 •0003. I certify that the animal waste management system fur the farm nuvted above has an animal wy
management plan that me_u or cxc_eds standards and speciricatiuns of the Division of Environmental `Ianagem
(DEM) as specified in i3A NC..\C 3H.0317 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conset:•afion Service (NRCS) antilor tr.
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission, pursuant to lid ,CAC 3H.03t7 and 1=.� NC.�C t5F .0001-
.0003. The following elements are included in the plant is applicable. While•each cat* ur: designates a technical specialist .
who may sign each certification (SD. SI. WU"P, RC. I). the technical specialis[ should only certify parts for which the.: are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storace. Treatment System
Check the appropriare box
?! Exi ring facility without recroCt (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity:
requirements.
,tora;e capahiliv. c;Insistent .r•itll rr;tSte utilization
Z yew, exrnanded or retrotieted facility (SD),
-Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_�,l�l�[2_�LO2
Mfiliadon Date Work Completed:
Address
Signaturt
hone No.:- r704--788 ;d0�
ate: -aa'97 --.�
B) Land ADpIicatfon Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization: chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loadine rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ RLE-tAap =Aqw(z-
Mfiliation D Date Work Corpleted:_ 9- rs-R7
Address (A2enc Lit)eeP L Phone No.:
Signature: .Date: /2 ',2-1 �
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the approprrare box
Z! Facility without exterior lots (SD ar Wt P or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior loLs.
4 Fsci itv with exterior t (RC)
McEhods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): iRCt+42L� --�(-v�—
Aiki[iati�n Date Wor -- Comple:ed: /-2-Z2--97
Address (.�Je tr:.!}: COQD PC 28oZ? Phone NO .: `7 -7 - Xes
Si,L,nzture: DUEL: / -.2A-97
AWC •- AU

./). Apolir_ation and HandliniE[Iuinment
C1teck the uppropr(we ijox
Er ,-kr 1'zy of e:+ i a j . r with
is q was li' 'nn r t n (1V[.P or i)
.animal waste application equipment ,petitied in the plan has been eidher ticld calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessari to accommodate the
waste management plant: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
e ;teed either the specitied hydraulic or nutrient Loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established. required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment 'guidance are C-mained as part of
the plan).
Z New, vuninded_nr existing facility without existing rice application rQlirm� t for sr+r. irricn[ipn (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can toyer the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
�%v.: panded. nr existins Facility without existing wtiste :hnnlication egu'pnhent Cor land snreading not t1sir,u
s=iv irrigacion (WUF or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to appiv waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule For timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibradun and adjustment. guidance are
,-contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): l �N
Affiliation SWCD Date
Address (
Signature
W'orl; Completed: /.2--Z) q7-
he ,\ro.: 7D�-7S8-r�lQ�
E) Odor Control. Trisect Control. Mortality'Management and Emerze_ncv :fiction Plan (SD
SI. WUP. RC or I)
The waste management. plan for this facility includes a Waste' Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency .fiction Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
`fort Iity Management Plan and the Emergency .action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
'same of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �411�N �rd`iLO22
Affiliation SWCQ Date Work- Completed: a
Address (AgencIO: cm&A OC Phone No.:-10 q - 186 -0,V 05
Si -nature: i24�-9� 4 CD�Wk�Date:_�.� o22
F) Written Notice of New or. Exvandin2.Swine Farm
The follo«in.- signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21. 1996. If the Facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that i (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance wit] the requirements of YCGS 106-305. A copy of the nonce and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:,_
Si -nature:
Date:
dame of'YIana;er cif different from owrer':: �.
Signature: Date:
,XWC -- .-u-ust I. 1' 97

III. Certification of Installatiolz
A) Collection. Storarte. Treattment Installation �'4t
New. exnanded ter ref otitted utility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to IaJouns and ponds. have bern installf
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and saecificadons.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification: is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B} Land ahylicdtion Site (WLP)
Check the appropriate box
3i The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
:1 Conditional .approval: all required land as speciiied in the plan is cleared for planting. the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (momhldayiyear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
Z) Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan cannot be established on newly cleared land within 30
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):�LtN AtaD, __�A_ YLo2
Affiliation U Date Work Completed: a-�2 "47
Address (Agency): T W- ' CAN Q.0 A)C A2 Phone No. '70q-798 o?I0S__
Signature: Date:_ --22 -7
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certifv that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion conrol. and will submit to DEl[ a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within li calendar dsr3 following the elate specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DE.M.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (ifdifferent tram owner):
Date:
Si(nature:_ _ _ _ Date:
,kut.-Ust 1. tg,)7

C). Runnf r Controls rrnm Exterior Lots (RC)
Facilicv with ctxt2rior lot;
NletltudA to n1inlntiZe die run off of pollutants front lswn-iin; and %eavy u,e :,:• ;,; ha:� be_n ;n,;t,1llecl as .,pecitied
in the plan.
Forfaciluies without extetlor lots. tit) certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):. ��js,t�A{Z© t A, � Lo2 _
Affiliation r3Q({ek(.t5 �WC,D Date ��•or:: Completed: �2
Address (AZency): $� GeiucoR� Q1:ane �o. _ 'r�i0h
Signature: Date:_ 42 `a,;?'9
D) anvlication and Handlina E ui rnent installation (WI.:P or I)
Check thypropriare block
._1 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the pian is o:: site and read-.- for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part or the plan.
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in dw plan ,gas not been insualled but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment ,specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Conditional approval: :animal waste application and handling equipment specified in [he plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year):- there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):lC
Affiliation 0-2R 5 SWCp Date Work Completed:_ /o?? a�2 - 7
Address (Agency): VQQ. Phone -
o.
Si;nature:
The following signature block is only% be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subjec: me
(us) to an enforcement action from DENT.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of :Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor_ Control. Tnsect Control and_Mortality-�lanatiement (SD. Si. WUP RC or 1)
-Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. Tne
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prirt[):
Aftiliati.o
Address (agency):
Siv nature:
-SG') C
_ Date: /�
A C -- Aw4uit 1. 199

y�}Cdp
llv J
A71 W Vd
IygW3� ,tea
Art C;r-
NI Oa
01W H08H01�7J
n )y
m
4 �. W313 rA
b -13N138 ¢
z Zz
��y o OO
y �0o S {3HOti 1 0
3 3:
a -a a� fn
4ate/wu +r^� 10 baMH
r
7H51fixD�K 3Jatts
S08 s •°b KpOaB ��3ssgyav i
fn )
ur =IIVV Cn
H138 ,= d`� a O
rn
ONS dl Qey w AN)Oa
7U
a y
0
N
s��=
a'A�Hor
�
a
o
3noa�ll3e
a3,x
TONI ANVO '
fa to Grp
r of a 3 a
•
-our •OfV1NaOW �
0a x a a' R
-
�n s rn
z oA�8Ah01 j ) �� 3 Id / a o�yo°z t53Afa w o
.0 n��Z` 'D�2 a• 3 z �a n3E , co
iS'd d� AlL 3 a
0 m' IM3
.i11�1) x %S �l oa
µ `°3Sn 1 ��a `+nw b�
ao �� ap o� �+ 0b3H3ti4 7
109
n0
o d• � .� •�� � a�B$., \� s 'S:,� y ,,, r °tip J)
� .'� � - . � 1. �--� . _.., • . �� d- a� . ��a . r.:-'i ` ' � ` ��°�.
p I v .3La"bye xd
109
qp J ' a
�N1003N
' •1 � � r 0
Al Dprr
N3)0
T" �o"acPo 1N31 /: ��d -I
y`0
o OS ,tp�aulN. �w a.1 1-. Q '!' ,,.,• ".i d'rb
on ac � � W � _--� � �•.= ! • � � � r- - y 'll3aC'23'hh• `' .y a �•
? cn ,,a��0ao C add 9�1 �L '-�' _� _ r— �. :s �s�,•�': � o�� � �
yr p
Z ���� dd L�t'1 i�. di\ r./ � d� 00 •x T .0�, y 1
►i�b
H J °; I ''
'Dad i�o� ''��%y c ow. oQ7 ya '► .; Jd�dIN a0dC�ti�'
9v 0 y a .ot`� �o°o a H3no
LI
0

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN RECEI V
wg�R OUgttn,SE D ON
Producer: JOE B. HARRIS
Location: 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD
HARRISBURG, NC 28075
Telephone: [phone]
Type -Operation: Existing Dairy Milk Cows
_�
Number of Animals: 160.00 head -.-- n00 I� '
d
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure: Waste Storage Structure
Application Method: I Irrigation
IV 2 01999
Non -Discharge permitting
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before
each application cycle. Annual soil tests are needed so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be.grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre
annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is
not allowed under DEM regulations.
Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied
not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injection the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose t6 change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The established acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which
could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste
to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content range for specific crop
production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
160.0 head x 7749 gal/head/year x 12 hrs on lot/24 hrs per day = 619,920 gals waste per year
160.0 head x .29 ac inch/head/yr x 12 hrs on lot/24hrs per day = 23.2 acre inches per year
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
23.2 acre inches of waste x 243 Ibs N/acre inch = 5637.61bs N/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil
type and surface application.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1. ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER:
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
TON,
BU
LBS N /
TON, BU.
ACRES
LBS N
USEDI>
MONTH TO
APPLY
387
1
CoB
CORN SIL
20
10
16.1
3,220
APR-JULY
387
4
CoB
CORN SIL
20
10
6.5
1 300'
APR-JULY
387
4
CoB
BARLEY
45
1.5
6.5
439
OCT-MAR
388
1
Ch
EoB
CORN SIL
19
10
24.2
4,598
APR-JULY
388
1
Ch
EoB
BARLEY
35
1.5
24.2
1,271
OCT-MAR
388
2
Ch
CORN SIL
22
10
12
2,640
APR-JULY
388
3
Ch
CoD
PASTURE
2.8
30
3.6
302
FEB-MAR
AUG-OCT
388
4
Ch
COB
CORN SIL
20
10
17
3,400
APR -DULY
388
4
Ch
CoB
BARLEY
35
1.5
17
893
OCT-MAR
388
5
CoB
CORN SIL
20
10
3.5
700
APR -DULY
388
6
CoB
SUDEX
5
45
6.2
1,395
JUNE-SEPT
388
6
CoB
BARLEY
45
1.5
6.2
418
OCT-MAR
388
7
Ch
PASTURE
3
30
7.2
648
FEB-MAR
AUG-OCT
388
8
Ch
PASTURE
3
30
10.5
945
FEB-MAR
AUG-OCT
388
9
Ch
CORN SIL
22
10
7.4
1,628
APR -DULY
TOTAL:
168.1
23,797
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals following summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the
N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of
North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses nitrogen.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in table above:
Crop RYE (Realistic Yield) unit Ibs N per Yield unit
Corn Silage ton/acre 10 lbs/ton
Barley bushel/acre 1.5 Ib/bu
Pasture (grazed) ton/acre 30 lbs/ton
Sudex ton/acre 45 lbs/ton

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NOW9,P
NITROGEN PRODUCED: 5,637.6 LBS.
NITROGEN USED (AW): 23,797.0 LBS
***BALANCE-18,159.4 LBS
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced. A negative number indicates more N needed than supplied by the waste.
SEE ATTACHED MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION
OF ANIMAL WASTE.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY HIM ON
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant
available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate
the acres shown in the table of acres owned by the producer. Failure to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
APPLICATION RATE
* APPLICATION
in/hr
AMOUNT inches
387
1 & 4
CoB
CORN SIL.
0.30
3.25
BARLEY
0.30
2.40
SUDEX
0.30
1.90
388
1-9
CoB
CORN SIL
0.30
3.25
CoD
BARLEY
0.30
2.40
PASTURE
0.30
1.60
388
1-9
EoB
CORN SIL
0.20
1.15
BARLEY
0.20
1.20
388
1-9
Ch
CORN SIL
0.35
2.35
BARLEY
0.35
1.90
PASTURE
1 0.35
1 1.60
*This is the maximum application allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed
' for the crop is not over applied. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under
optimum soil conditions.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be
removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste
be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard
except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the application
equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in table 1. Failure to
apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen may make this plan invalid. Call your
technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE QF OPERATION
The temporary waste storage consist of two waste storage ponds. Waste is to be applied to crops
and/or pasture during the growing season when needed for nitrogen benefits or as needed for
irrigation water as long as nitrogen limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded.
The waste storage pond levels will be pumped down prior to November to allow storage during
the winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively
growing to take up nutrients. The waste is to be applied to the fields and crops listed in Table 1
within the nitrogen limits fisted. Waste will not be applied in such a manner that results in waste
runoff or over application of nutrients.
Application rates must be based on current waste analysis and applied to actively growing crops.
Waste must be analyzed as close to the time of each application as practical and at least within 60
days (before or after) of the date of application. Additionally, a representative Soil Fertility
Analysis shall be conducted annually on each application site receiving animal waste. The results
of these test shall be maintained on file for a minimum of three years. Proper records, including
maintenance, repair and irrigation (waste application) records, shall also be maintained on site and
in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
The Division of Water Quality Regional Office in Mooresville will be notified at 704-663-1699 as
soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence
of any of the following events:
a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters.
b. Spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting animal waste to the
application sites which results in, or may result in, a discharge to surface waters.
c. Any deterioration or leak in a storage pond.
d. Failure to maintain adequate storage capacity in a storage pond that poses an immediate
threat to public health or the environment.
e. Overspraying animal waste either in excess of the limits set forth in this plan or where
runoff enters waters of the State.
f. Any discharge that bypasses a a storage pond.
Also, refer to Required Specifications, Irrigation Calibration, and Waste Sampling. (attached)

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Name of Farm: HARRIS DAIRY
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to
be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this
system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil
and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: JOE B. HARRIS
Signature:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Date: ,2- a -- ?�
Date:
RICHARD I. TAYLOR
Affiliation: CABARRUS SWCD Phone No.: 704-788-2105
Address (Agency): 745 CABARRUS AVENUE WEST
CONCORD, NC 28027
Signature: Date:

WASTE UT i : ZAT ION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste sna_ . not r can surface wa v :F : re state b.
runoff, drift, manm ace conveyances, direct sop . . _ a , i on , or
direct discharge during waaration or land ampli ca.'t1on, Amy
discharge of waste which . esc`res surface water jA prohibited.
2. There lust b; documer at_.r in the sastgn folder that the
producer l tn:er- owns zr- has an agreamert for .use of aaequ_-lt•-W
land on which to wrz a ,c awy the wast . :f the producer does
not yawn adoc me land: t- pyacery disp. e of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an ag', dam_:- _ with n landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him her- the use cT the land for
waste application. It is the ; espons is i l i -y cf the owner- of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Flan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of util_lat__n, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be apolied to meet, but not exceed, the
nAr-ogen need's for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, un lesss ' There are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other- nutrients.
4. animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be apolied to land that is eroding
at 5 or More tens, but less Than 10 tens per acre per year
providing: grass filter- strios are installed where runoff leaves
the field. !See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste ,is to be applied onacres subjects to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
doe's not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Cart l ina" for guidance.
%. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates n; . to eKcaed the soil
infiltration rate sw=h that , _rn',Tf does n•_. 'ac'cur Offsite Or •t.:�
surface waters and in a method which does not cause tr i t from
the siteduring application. No ponding should occur- in orda,-
to control odor or flies.
a Animal waste sna.11 not w applied cc zatorated s I_ri doring
rainfall events, or when tha sor''st a is f'r o en.
. ?nimaj oasis shall ce apg:lsd gar, anti4ely growing ;ropy in such
a manner" that the crap is nQ t _ yet ec w i V Aa's to to a depth that.
wo+_ li inn iL i t growth. The ;v 7 r t; 41 for salt damage from an ims
waste should also be consijs=arld.

WASTE UT it- I::;',TiON FLAN
FEQU_IFED_5FECIFICATION5
spring ,_...ar?te,:1 _ -DM 3-. " s 4J_.*h a nigh �i?'.•7en':..�..L fo,
19 A:-- ,ir-g. ie,;_ 1oaa-;ng rates on these zoils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable .linter cove,,- ^rop planted to
take up re.eased Waste shall not be app««--'a more
than 31:1 day_ pri.,l_ ., p:a,Ii ing '_f 'he _,-L ge= lrea�.:,
dorman c.Y
11. any new ,,give zf j el- o:?ct.0ber 1, ' ,4?z shell,
comply with tn? T'y11owing: .,e OLIt-fir per-iinetel- of the land area
onto wh1ch wr—zta is applied fl--tm .a 1ag',on thhat. i = _. comp-Imen t of
a swine ; arm Si -.all be at least 5(:! feet from any residential
property boundary and from .any perennial stream or rive,,- (purer
than an irrigation ditch or. canal. Arrimal waste other- than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after Olctober 1., '_995),
shall not be applied closer than ES feet to perennial waters.
(See �;t•an'dard 393 - F i l tar Str ips 's .
12. Animal waste shall not be .app;-4a,d closer- than 1k_if.l Tact t,i
wells.
13. Animal waste Shall not be applied closer than E0C) feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other- property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surfaCe w•zrters,
drainageways, or wet -lands ty a discha-•ge t:ir by over ---spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have Ween approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly inton water- courses,
acid on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift -From
the site.
16. Dames-?'_ .ar.d industrial wasta from washdown f-aci l ities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be d--sch3rged into the
animal waste management system.
1?. A protective cover appropriate ve.get•ati..ln will be
established on all disturbed areas 4iagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be f?nced . as necessa;-y j r.o
protect the vegetation. °•r°e�e}.3 ; --. 1 =_lch as f!-e•es, anl-'«tfi3s and
l'ltn r- Wo.��']y species , air • . a:"? l .iT:. kar_ r,_ ;a:-,s.g..� WI^•el-e =,-Iriaidered
aOp!-ops - -Ate. l.ag_ on arsa= 71ean'.. ?c_eaa ible
Se --ina and "i--i--- C�.% ?5 SroZ -.-Z =e -r3-;, Mr+

q4JON S-Isaw ��''=r _k=—UU--) s UT 1.0 peslds'p as =ItM slIeWTul? peaQ •ELD
's_leaA (g) aAT a _iC•l paute4UTWW
aq T!sgS 94SLPM _ia4'4'C TIE- -iC.:� sp_kC'C,a_k uC'T�eMT -UCJe a.IS?M •s_k??aA
(2) 6a_14'4 -LC-.L aeuTl-,-':iuTeur aq TTsUS sp-_i0Ma'_( UaT•}V:)tTdde a4sem
A-(p f•-'*i1-1LI A .s._eaf. ani_: _kc,; -4da:A as TTe4s sp_kO:)a_k STsAlieue
a4sem PUP T70S 'ncr_Tlp'1LT'3w pus uLn:aznpu_ld do-iz wnwT4dc
_kLll pagsa-:i'pl? a- 77t•L45 H. •S C-Ac�T aATSs Z);tS gzeojdde sTelaw
Sat4q UaUM preSii SO T T>i-LS sma :s do-tz, C-AT I u_k-'•Y TP PUSPS-t0'4TU0UJ
SO lleq% STT'Cs a44 UT S,aASj GU!' _LIZ7 '4uewaTa
8UT UTtid_ic3 fcp, — a3ls_i EUS CSC T -'t?Ls ' pcT T dd>< c_lr ."s-aonpLn-td
a4sem Q_ka4M S9-;Ts d0-1:� ATTFnuu>r :1seaT 4v pesseq .eq TTP4s
T T Lis pus UC T'teZ . T - 41 i = C: sr.SD f_,q UT L 1 TM p<&q eq aq T l?qS c3gSeM ' 22
• spuod aye-iogs
e:;St'M _ cLJi-,TCA c•8L*_I0:;s ujnw:`,.SLL'• auL; L'4 pca_iinb$_: aq
TT iM-(a.-q-t w 'S_lsj_IP111 aq-4 Lia9M-4SCy SAsT pTmbTT 9J-4 UTlp'4UTlpLLJ
-:1prablpUtU3 cp .' IF, LS5 bUTdwl'1A 'SUc-nbe: a45PM TTlp
0 (at M10A bUTdiund) a5lp_10-;,s Axtp todwa4 GL,'-; ;C' s.UC,T ;EI.C+Ta UJ'144t'!q
pus do-4 ay4 0'_ c'eT Tom?=_UT aq 1-Pus S_la)j-1Pw eTaTsTA A.I45iH ' T2
•ucnsse's dcr_kC+ aq4 6ui_klnp a-4sem TNwTUs
.J., sU071'4 <TTddlr-ie4'4-kMJ. CIu u-aTM quetda_td paTTdde eq Aluo pTnogs
t T UCT4dwnsuom ulpkul-,4 sdLi_ka uo pas)-, st a4sem TlpwTuw
1.T 'ULrT'-:.dwi7sUl•s Lreti11"iq qz—=a-::p _kol siC+_ln-.t1'4'4L1 pulp
jCs�. k U' Pas'-,cC.• U>r=24stM Ii±wTUd •i_lE
.�C• da;>� �-�li�,fr� C - --� CZ,L_ ...,_ U71E-tV ..IIF MF•�_k u r_ T'',s ::'us
`t':•f Vic`: `...._II'+. 'E E!, Lel•,c_!C: _.. e = p _ � _i^ 'C^ u:: '"'dsU: a
r�•(�-�Ci,rc ' .._c r�T Ft `..'diJI.-i rb;.. ~-- F---`•- -• '-'.-� �"+l. 1lpL: � �'�M •�i
c, c: t U IE C, T 1T C+ L7 c E" L' c- n F. J 1 T O' W i7 u1
a:L iz e" L U; 7 E Tf+, _ T LlW, - W c 11-re L. T - r: f • Q T ' UaUla T dLL! T
_: r _: L: , 'E. _1. _ _. C -' i.!'_ _ G: c '. 5 c U f. C c U FI & J E' L' T iu _i a -
_! i?' li r T U IF
SNG I G32I nOMI

Agri -Waste Management
Siological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
,fames C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader. collect about 2 lbs of manure from
' different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the' surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid,Kanure Slurry
L. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper and of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over and
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at lease l quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. "take sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper-ag::acor pu.Mp or propeller ag:tacor.
b. Take subsar.•nles from about 5 pit locations. from agitator puxp
or frcn spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
+► Professor and Extension Specialist. Biological and Ag:iculcural Engineering
Department, ;larch Carolina Stace University, Raleigh, NC.

2 -
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint cc a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic samp:-s ccnta:ne_.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of 10=15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within V of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
L. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g., _
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area do:•n to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket. mix, and add
about-2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix. add 2.3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and sea?.

t
. 2 -
e. Mix and Add 3/4 pint Co a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to f:Lsh tanks in a nonmetallic sampld container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on and of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within 1' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers. and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b..Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
:around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and -6he
`other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
C. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about•2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
U. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and sea?.

. 3 .
r
II. SAIXPL9 PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is Most reliable way or sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
I. AAL Eastern Agricultural Lab. Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: (312)398-OLIO
ii. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Vinton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
:Ph: [phone]
IV. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, VI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
I. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Wasce/Solution► Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders.
brooderhouse, grower, number Flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Wasce type (dairy.lot scraped manure, liquid slurry: swine -pit
slurry. lagoon. liquid, sludge: broiler -house liter, stockpile
IV. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P. K, Ca, fig. van.
S. Fe, Ln, Zn, Cu. B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, No. Cd, Ni. Pb

OE
40
Ir
74

I.-
�jil�tL'• f � � � �� �4 � • l i by
y .� K R: 'I( r.��l�.r,��t� ���{ ��s',t�yf�`�,�;r��,-.:�..•f.,,..�;I-'�"' ;'�• 7liq.�,lt. ��• i�
S ,�1r..1 R � .��, a;"� ,L l:�i - � tir��p �.. ,•���''TR ':.r F �� 1'ar r y � � r-
� H�?^'I�y ''7 '.I , .'rY, r - �^d � t ,;' ^ ����YI"v it�� r o� s '. , �,5 "',, 7 1 �' ♦" � \ \ i
,�,+.,`.�..:i, yr• 1M'•. 'i"+ '=•1;J,+..: J.'tS';!`,^,lti',,� :';1' ,;: ;',.i'S. � `:C .,t. . �.sa�v
� y S��r:� ? rLsr�'r Sti, �•. r,,,PY'� Jr r+ J�\ 'tom , •l. 4 4t •�+ ref +r,;.'
.r` ,fa � r� rrr �.CY..'��:f.•!•1•}1•�Y �� :at .}h � R,.F % °� ` �r, } r „pt �,, {
,r{ t r T }�� 7•.•..7�1+. ,y�:.rr ,,I r.e `i,'� - ,; � d r < t , .,. , j,r , � ,
I•i, :rs �, ,r. �.'.. �' t.' ,'r, , •>•y:: .ri {i '`l.''i �'. ... ^r � t' ( I f\. r, i Y.. ;. -��'. .SS h." �`r •Cr 1 .'r;••s
'� 'r ,� ��� 1n-;t�.}, 4� �' '•'S� �� 'r..l br.':3 - '� ti - ,�� � r r ;;r j !-' �, s �{l
' � �' ^�,•�'. .(. +, ,� +r: .< ,.,r�S , �'S n7 71, r..n r +'.i S \` � i rti � � *,•�� ,-f+��'•
•�+..t�.iR �H.. ,l�ih..7.•irir' ''�:y '{j1 - t N :k' �Sw.'� ,•,
r + :� _•/7 `�� f: Sj, , '. f R_ C;r fl' •� , J, .l,
�y�► -t�' �; ;'�1, � NSF ;�,� � i�.� � + ru � '
.�, }��yf'� :�•,-i,�"F��. h ti,��1� +' 'i. .'r.;• 'Y4 .t cif ,'�:r1 :'�' :S, •'l._ '�
}s�s-��u �•x /�, •+'.+�l+t `� .�.. _ + 'e"y p. .'fY ,,'.:� .. '7 y' +�'' �� ,s.w.s,r i�.�r'r
4 }y},,,'fr�,y f�J4 Y.��`7 1-' .� r'i, ; f � q. I +,'\ ti•. 'fit'_ .ids S .i'.
ft Tirf ..' �� ✓• , '. l.i(''R: I�.T.,i S � y`, ylf 1 'L� `.1 I_. S " .� r : . «
'.�� �•r} .• r•'1L'4 Z i. #' ,'.' , a.7.[Y$ r„}' 3r.. s �', 'I � -�,'yr•h f ray;.,.
..Y,r;�� ^ ,I JC' r� : � •r L" -� � �•..�r, i'~ ��� r7�r� br ,� ti
..�i.} i? + '.,��'x�rr �:. �1 i- +'�-.4�t,' .S ''1.' rl ��.4s{q�+r•r' .
17
.S1 _�'bi-. 1 I�": s , y .�. � f7r..� j .s• �yl. Y.
:.�.f1•. r},��`' ��, `4' .� �1.'�, ��I�y.� 3 s, - j ,F 1 7,r r}J (� r y,! r' y q i �Yi ,,�,"r� •V �fr{��� ��� 1 r� '�f•�14f'.,sgr\°' �� � Ji4�f /[yF- d)/S�f'y = �+ � �r :a � � \ ',5.'� � � +F' �' E#"�, t�,, r
�F t t-r� _ +� tr fe' 11.,7: 'v �.., r,,i I. :`.I�;=:. ' � � �• J7 �w
'fr�.SY;,}�,,�j''.
T•'Fs Y.,+J ``y. ?i I ik"'•T� re +, ,ails' T13t .t )'�♦ie,:} '.i'ri r•�. :.(.+`� �7YYt '�.� ,.1t+w \
±� �%YY��'} •+ Y'! } � ,.,'! � .1 t�f_r, t.l .• is ,ar`'?•fro•s :.5� '' � ♦ �`r
��/ir ��tl � M « 'h • Fl: ��jrl.i'�.� • t 7.'S:� _~ i , � • s �"J r '� � r . .rL>
rq.i�, .'
. -+i � r 1�,J+rI +r },y r •. Y `..? i a� c .f4 .i ;1! ' .•: Ji'' •J ••'� 5.• .� � _y , - .
o'" %+x r' 'K''•.f. ,J.• :s=tir.: rr�, r f�l 1.:. ! (,,i. � r. v _ - 7
r '>, -+ .,-� • � t '.3 � � ., s \; ' � �, is S ' .�' j 1 3j
"'}k? rl . 4 fr i '� b 1 4 i •j,,,
.:t4l 1 ( '.r ' Sv'fl," oil'r�- ��:L r s i a' I rr -� ,� c , %+ :err' r .: „_ ! ,!�'q r\,•
� ,� r,: jtt J'i"` s `*- I'} - 1 '•f 1 l•, •..+1e � ,
�1'd+'/ }'�- .r 'iir` + 1r>+ L+,II�.r i'jk •yr� S�'.it� ��,,'f.: .' -+ N,t-i.. I.�'`�.a i.k.
1 �,1 � u! I .� S� r �„�'M�•�1•L' .4. l i .� . t �3 ; ;•r� `•'. •} hrl. '• t -- J i ' '!b:
•f�„rS ti' y' j. h I r : s �.�:• r }: d� r'r�: ':��'i 1 'a.�
f, .yam, S l- _ ,f�;.��r} 1' {'� ;i 1 \ 7,s , '`+• ,� r y7�r,.
:;s s.' �~ryr.' ,si+ / } r . i .,: �t}"-.` F�. +�•I �' • C. ,, s� "y °5^ ,; t ; �' . , I.: i t .t' i
+�"il} 1r w��(�l�s ���,y;� ,+ r~_1 � .fit' �` '� .• ..r l �� <.ti =j, ��t. ' � F + + +r .. ';l ,E i - �,
h�4! - I � r J� 1 �' . .r�{i>�Q'v� - �- t rr ��r}r+�•k' } i .� �'+.. .� :' 114 + n. i/ w
S .+ ray Vy.<7 ter'-lr ,�' �s.• °�`�: ��' ^ .� ice. I ,r ,- '.�_ ./` {z-
Olt
+ �. ,Irr t yc!I �,ts17j�;':I• ( lu'� '.`',t� �+ 1, s' 'i`:' sir
'+1 •,�i .r 'S,#,r '�. , 5• Fk{�Tf itJ,t \iH .�';I'.Y+., 7 {'Y - �� a. � '
t r rl + t4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: JOE B. HARRIS
Location: 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD
HARRISBURG, NC 28075
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Dairy Milk Cows
Number of Animals: 200 head
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure: Waste Storage Structure
Application Method: Irrigation and Broadcast
WAT?E C Ei VED
QUALl ySEC7lON
MAR 2 8 2000
N0n.Discf4rge Permitting
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are needed so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre
annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is
not allowed under DEM regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied
not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The established acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made,
which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area
receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content range for
specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A
NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER 60 DAYS (gallons)
200 hd x 7749 gal/hd/yr x 60 days/ 365 days/yr18 hrs on lot/24 hrs/day = 191,072 gals/60 days
WASTE WATER PER 60 DAYS (gallons)
800 gal/day x 60 days = 48,000 gals / 60 days
NORMAL RUNOFF (gallons)
(Both Ponds)
0.2 ac x 7.49" = 1.5 ac-in / 12"/ft = 0.13 ac-ft x 43,560 ft3/ac = 5438 ft'
5438 ft3 x 7.48 gal/ft' = 40,676 gals / 60 days
HEAVIEST 2 MONTHS OF RAINFALL (gallons)
(Both Ponds)
9.3" Rain — 6.7" Evap = 2.6" / 12"per ft. = 0.22 ft x 12,589 ft2 S.A. = 2770 ft'
2770 ft3 x 7.48 gal/ ft3 = 20,720 gals / 60 days
VOLUME OF 25 YEAR / 24 HOUR STORM EVENT (gallons)
Runoff Area (Both Ponds)
5.8" x 0.2 ac / 12"per fl. = 0.1 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft' / ac-ft. = 4211 ft3 = 31,497 gals / 60 days
Pond Suface Area (Both Ponds)
6.0" x 0.29 ac / 12"per ft. = 0.145 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft3/ ac-ft. = 6316 ft3 = 47,245 gals / 60 days

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL WASTE STORAGE NEEDED PER 60 DAYS (gallons)
191,072 gals A.W. + 48,000 gals Parlor + 40,676 gals R.O. + 20,720 gals Precip. +
31,497 gals 25.24 R.Q. +47,245 gals 25/24 Pond S.A. = 379,210 gals
Pond 1
Pond 2
TOTAL "AS BUILT" STORAGE AVAILABLE (gallons)
15,000 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 112,200 gallons
37,225 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 278,443 gallons
Total = 390,643 gallons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
379,210 gals / 60 days x 365 days / year x 4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal.* = 9458 lbs. N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil
type and surface application.
*4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal represents highest level of the three most recent waste analysis.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1. ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER:
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BU.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
309
1 a
IdA
PASTURE
4.0
30
12.5
1500
MAR-
EnB
Fescue
JUNE
Ch
SEPT-
DEC
309
I c
IdA
CORN SIL
17
10
16.4
2788
APR-
MeB
JULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
2009
MAY-
JULY
309
Id
IdA
CORN SIL
20
10
I T6
3520
APR-
Ch
JULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
2156
MAY-
JULY
309
2
IdA
CORN SIL
17
10
52.3
8891
APR-
EnB
JULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
6407
MAY-
JULY
309
3a
IdA
CORN SIL
17
10
14.6
2482
APR-
EnB
JULY
SOYBEAN
35
3.5
1789
MAY-
JULY
309
3b
IdA
FESCUE
3.5
40
6.6
924
MAR-
EnB
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
309
4
EnB
PASTURE
3.3
30
25.9
2564
MAR-
EnD
Fescue
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
309
12
IdA
PASTURE
3.5
30
24.9
2615
MAR-
EnB
FESCUE
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
387
la
COD
MATUA
9.0
45
3.8
1539
MAR-
MeD
Hay
JUNE
COB
SEPT-
DEC
387
lb
COB
CORN SIL
23
10
12.3
2829
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1937
MAY-
JULY

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BU.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
387
4
CoB
CORN SIL
23
10
4.0
1495
APR-
CoD
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1024
MAY-
JULY
BARLEY
60
1.4
546
SEPT-
NOV
FEB-
APR
388
la
Ch
ALFALFA
0
15.0
NIA
MeD
EoB
CORN SIL
20
10
3000
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
2363
MAY-
JULY
388
1 b
'MeD
FESCUE
4.5
40
3.4
612
MAR-
MeB
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
Ic
Ch
CORN SIL
22
10
5.8
1276
APR-
MeD
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
914
MAY-
JULY
388
2a
EoB
FESCUE
4.5
40
3.0
540
MAR -
Hay
JUKE
SEPT-
DEC
388
2b
EoB
CORN SIL
22
10
9.0
1980
APR-
Ch
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1418
MAY-
JULY
388
3
MeD
PASTURE
4.5
30
3.6
486
MAR-
Ch
Fescue
.TUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
4a
MeD
CORN SIL
22
10
7.9
1738
APR-
Ch
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
1244
MAY-
JULY
RYE
6.0
40
1896
SEPT-
NOV

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
FEB-
APR
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BIJ.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
388
4b
Ch
MATUA
9.0
45
4.9
1985
MAR -
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
4c
MeD
PASTURE
4.5
30
4.2
567
MAR-
CoD
Fescue
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
5a
CoB
MATUA
9.0
45
0.8
324
MAR -
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
5b
CoB
CORN SIL
23
10
2.7
621
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
425
MAY-
JULY
BARLEY
45
1.4
170
SEPT-
NOV
FEB-
APR
388
6
CoB
MATUA
9.0
45
6.2
2511
MAR-
CoD
Hay
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
7
PoF
PASTURE
4.0
30
7.2
864
MAR-
PcE3
Fescue
JUNE
Ch
SEPT-
DEC
388
8
Ch
PASTURE
4.5
30
10.5
1418
MAR -
Fescue
JUNE
SEPT-
DEC
388
9
Ch
CORN SIL
28
10
7.4
2072
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
55
3.5
1425
MAY-
JULY

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
CROP
RYE
LBS N /
ACRES
LBS N
MONTH
TON,
TON, BU.
USED
TO
BU
APPLY
389
3
CoB
CORN SIL
23
10
12.9
2967
APR-
JULY
SOYBEAN
45
3.5
2032
MAY-
JULY
BARLEY
45
1.4
813
SEPT-
NOV
FEB-
APR
5599
l
IdB
CORN SIL
17
10
32.8
5576
APR-
IdA
JULY
MeB
SOYBEAN
32
3.5
3674
MAY -
TOTAL:
329.2
45314
* Acreage may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding (i.e. interplanted) or winter
annuals following summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the
N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of
North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses nitrogen.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in table above:
Crop
RYE (Realistic Yield) unit _
lbs N per yield unit
Corn Silage
ton/acre
10 lbs/ton
Soybeans
bushel/acre
3.5 1bs/bu
Barley
bushel/acre
1.4 lb/bu
Pasture (grazed)
ton/acre
30 lbs/ton
Pasture (hay)
ton/acre
40 lbs/ton
Matua Grass (hay)
ton/acre
45 lbs/ton
NITROGEN PRODUCED: 9,458 LBS
NITROGEN USED (AW): 45,314 LBS
***BALANCE-37,344 LBS
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced. A negative number indicates more N needed than supplied by the waste.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SEE ATTACHED MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION
OF ANIMAL WASTE.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Your facility has been determined to have a waste holding capacity for 60 days of temporary
storage with a maximum of 200 head of cattle. The temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 2 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste stored in your
structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event
of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the application
equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in table 1. Failure to
apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen may make this plan invalid. Call your
technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Animal waste disposal will be completed by two methods, irrigation and broadcast application
for this dairy operation. The irrigation system is a traveling gun operation and irrigates Tract
388, fields 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and Tract 387, fields 1, and 4. The farm operation has a
3300 gallon Slurry Tank applicator. The remaining fields listed in table 1 will receive waste
through broadcast applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content,
soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should
not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate
the acres shown in the table of acres owned by the producer. Failure to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may make this plan invalid.
The irrigation system consist of one traveling gun operating at one time. At no time will the
application amount of waste water exceed more than one inch of waste water applied during the
application cycle. See table 2 for maximum application rates.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY SLURRY TANK
The operator has a 3300 gallon Slurry Tank applicator and will use this to apply animal waste on
fields not covered by the traveling gun irrigation system. Effective utilization of maure is not

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a given area. For proper calibration
of manure spreader, see attached information sheet.
Table 2. Maximum application rates for traveling gun system.
Tract
Field
Acres
Inches/ Hr
Max./ Cycle
(inches)
Max. Amtl
Cycle (ac.-in.)
387
la
9.0
0.30
0.90
8.1
387
lb
12.3
0.30
0.90
11.0
387
4
4.0
0.30
0.90
3.6
388
la
15.0
0.20
0.60
9.0
388
lb
3.4
0.20
0.60
2.0
388
I c
5.8
0.35
0.70
4.0
388
2a
3.0
0.2
0.60
1.8
388
2b
9.0
0.20
0.60
5.4
388
3
3.6
0.35
0.70
2.5
388
4a
7.9
0.35
0.70
5.5
388
4b
4.9
0.35
0.70
3.4
388
4c
4.2
0.30
0.90
3.7
388
5a
0.8
0.30
0.90
0.8
388
5b
2.7
0.30
0.90
0.8
388
6
6.2
0.30
6.90
5.5
388
7
7.2
0.20
0.60
4.3
388
8
10.5
0.35
0.70
7.3
388
9
7.4
0.35
0.70
1.6
Total
80.3 ac-in
MANAGEMENT OF WASTE APPLICATION
No matter what method is used, waste is to be applied to crops and/or pasture during the growing
season when needed for nitrogen benefits or as needed for irrigation water as long as nitrogen
limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded.
The waste storage pond levels will be pumped down prior to December to allow storage during
the winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively
growing to take up nutrients. The waste is to be applied to the fields and crops listed in Table I
within the nitrogen limits listed. Waste will not be applied in such a manner that results in waste
runoff or over application of nutrients.
Application rates must be based on current waste analysis and applied to actively growing crops.
Waste must be analyzed as close to the time of each application as practical and at least within 60
days (before or after) of the date of application. Additionally, a representative Soil Fertility
Analysis shall be conducted annually on each application site receiving animal waste. The

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
results of these test shall be maintained on file for a minimum of three years. Proper records,
including maintenance, repair and irrigation (waste application) records, shall also be maintained
on site and in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells or within 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the farm operator. Animal waste shall be applied in a manner not to
reach other property and public rights -of -ways by runoff or drift.
The Division of Water Quality Regional Office in Mooresville will be notified at 704-663-1699
as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters.
b. Spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting animal waste to the
application sites which results in, or may result in, a discharge to surface waters.
c. Any deterioration or leak in a storage pond.
d. Failure to maintain adequate storage capacity in a storage pond that poses an immediate
threat to public health or the environment.
e. Overspraying animal waste either in excess of the limits set forth in this plan or where
runoff enters waters of the State.
f. Any discharge that bypasses a a storage pond.
Also, refer to Required Specifications, Irrigation Calibration, and Waste Sampling. (attached)

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Name of Farm: HARRIS DAIRY
Faciliv Number: 13-7
Owner/Mana er A reement
1 (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and .
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to
be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this
system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil
and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: JOE B. HARRIS
Signature: od• Date:_ 3117I00
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan
Date:
KEN COUCH
Resource Conservation Specialist
Cabarrus SWCD
Certified By: MATTHEW J. KINANE
Affiliation: USDA-NRCS Phone No.: 704-788-2107
Address (Agency): 715 CABARRUS AVENUE WEST
CONCORD, NC 28027 1
Signature: If OL Date: b3 ! a y la 000

tr
i
a
lot
I
:1
�v

iE , .-r7+j t�•? �irf' •. "'C °� i y 'q�., res . ° ° r � � ,t„_. 1.
`o �f����' �lt�;. ht��, � y'1 ,�, ti� ,�g� r l4' ,• pA II • �� * +��
�^� � ` - f� ''�4�`I��p r� �fl �i p_ I l f� ,�• �a � i,� �. � i!s sL f
OR
OF
i � �� >rti�;/r�� f r � '• • • ') � t � j � ,, (},ram
ONO
w Ea
00
V �� tru •• �• i"" -��J'y 1{��,' �^�. ,i� � w � d��; r yA�cS '
]i wl 4 fl s G1t1
X
A INS
po
ol
4k °�r ',,`_ w i ai+rw n s %' Is,K $ c:..• "7� �'�/` .; ��' 'i' t,LY r !� w ra i� f `,
y�
�t`� b . �t.� Ip scy c !' � ,+� ylh¢ '.f�jj! eT� •' J �� " k ��:�� O
q• t r •- ,C 1. .. till
Jk� Illy
• `psi ` �bt a "� y �.. I `:aj�•f ^�a'la � .-� -. G o ,,.a D ;��� f� I, M1 � ,

fo-
,b
All-
13
EP
i .
40
All
tk
' rL'•rf �/mob/,• 'f � , �� ' P � -.� r - - I
�.T �9� i„�"""' ✓ , \. ; � `�•,, � v �, . '� �tk' ;Q + n n U Ards
1 r'k ,. �.4 ' � �• � `" � ��- is h ��-yj� � • �• r4 „"� �. ' � �;� 9 i O.�y aC`,r r�,�` A .
r�, �� ��� , � t � ��` � /���333�� [� !1 � � i {�y��'r . � �� •t,l � i kf L �
"b r� ,,,r• r44 �
jJ
Ilk
a s "fir n b
04
a
.,. , ,; it �' is•. i '�t'� �+'
VN� J / \ .. �. � . �-• 4 _ � •moo O � ": .' ' ` .

10;r�0
11 aa�V .f�'1"T,• ; � �rL ��1��1 :iiiifi1 ` .`' •51, �. � Yn LS�'h r4 L� ., ' Yf`i
lti .KIM,
�N t:�J,�.� V{11 � �•.+'y� " / r .���• i`7y .�, +y[.,. .` � ?r�' •1lOt'`�''Nt
r.0.
AFL
MGM. OT
015
11.4
Vol
••} 4 S.� �l� i �� i✓`r ♦ '�'+ fly .}.L
` ` .o ►' ",1�14 f+1 + ram`
• F�� �l, .�j��:yY��� r'�;:^�ji' ,lit' tr:' : i 1yel• ..
'r r�.'� f` - Ina\. � F3 , I .i•+4
7 11l.�lP.� 1` 1�7_AV �fN � 1 ' •f :J.S�. .. �.
�t yt.7' f��f�r;Y ij?fi: �r ® �'. .��• rp,„ ,!�_ .
k.N ,•`�)' �.1�,���►�a.f�'�•�„j' ,ji:�� .p.r-,j�4 ��i: r.-,: f

r,,}}.t `�jj tA'�(i't�[r V]y�11 - >, •'i L` • }i, � �'' +,{r ��:,�, v` _ I .f�A:�`gl •J,. '�r {
rr i.{1 f 'r �H" _+~A •,{' �� <`�j Ir'M t�'i Y t,��"�\' f{ 4
•�y`�•ytHr" l�'F,i� .r �.�J •1.ltal:.l V'��� � .:;��1'�� ti,"• �'�• ,h• '� - �����f'�� ;�...,;!'y�{,
`' j�?f_ CTt:I ss.: r ' �••� � C .� I . `�!. jn' ,F .fit 1' /,,*�S':a7-'�^-w' � Mc r 4-
41
kk
Ki
'•it�,' "�.t„,,�.'�`� i ,!',�:ij'�' ,� ,,y?.l 'ij 7�'- ' • r F , `� � i _�-:�r�'• -i .I .r
` �ti � .� �� d .� � � iI � J/ '� A r f �',`• � Ar�„
C10 7,., ,�� , � ' - VIM J .I'���.. .�xn �'• � 1 ,� �.t„ t
DO
.1'J
"'�+�• `•K: ! �� i• , `, �J7 ..Yrlf , ��•{wF..� •1' i ,� � ;� s>a ,'_�' ,,y' , rr �` `�, fit. � , •\•, '� � '
(J 1 fW I "CC!!1 •i �71 �s ,, 1 , F
th����' d I'�, it `',`-1 i f , { ',�j ..lrk•+ .I`1 ,1 . � ���t r �l i
1�.f.i' _ - ,�""'`--, ��� a •tip., �,. rVl' ��11. .. r+��� (�+ •
31,
I '�t ,��fr .'p��• •+flrr-�!' jf� •� v �...;^�iyc 1i. �,,{]y���t, i )/
IANt,f,
,� . ., � r : ff7:'+ ! �: r � ; rit < �>t• ,N.. i '�,, • �.� ii a ;,,, '.� �-.•- �,`-'sx:•., h�tv ' 4
4-./ �]� �1 A n,.r� ,fir, �� ...r' "�'� �%•' •r t J� Jt ' 'k. ` k11w�f�r �„'�. ��
W ftLL�j++;�jjjf ` '.* �S'y h ' � tiy. '`�,,... L j rF,l+'•S�. 4. .i �.� �,`,.. \'�.Iy. .. _ •. ,.•'�� �. .t.
~ ��•: y :, y!�{ ttia ,••• r i�f�;,. �,` I . r '}`', •vim-„ r ' / w�.. ��.... ; : �fs- ..f r r �f
'r}} �' •`.
A +f.:*1ti:G' I�. s ilk" ) V`�• 7 ' ;�.j`Hl� _. 1JL ` •� � �
AL
''� ' is �!,�,. ' �' k , `k�='i'' • ` �r� r !
r '
If
• �• ��,�� ��� •'�ti �' {rr X -� '4, �-'! tr,!i�,i;e- Y' .! `• :.�i s f.,j:', � _ �� 4 {'I,��i'�" � r
�01••, I.ilk ,� +��• r/..,�, �10
7Ird(A::1P
r ♦ .c !.`t rr h €t+ F -•i p y .r'L 4i •�..
{firit
tv
AlK
-� Ord_• '.ti .. .� T. �iSC7.3.. _,:. �:�•F %•�ftJ r'ti .`1' .' Cc,'• {•.r
+ i
ta' ,1 If7
Lam• � �'- r. {`. N• e' r r '�' � •`•' �"'d�.�.,-7 ••• `,�'S''',�'yyllt.l, j
tea¢ f L! r•/ .. � ! sus t � �f,^ F �, i �.. �f•� T•� ( +� j� ,�i� 4 �'-
• �,�rM� t rt i'1• .! ' �I� ,�r�.�A•.l+ti' �•, '; �s, r!3AJ�:," 1�. •�+`i' �,l�S •. ., rr

iw,, i,1 �'� '. 'tip ,"' .� Il�r �' •� _;•_. .F,• C' 1 k►� .'' iFJ''• +r
NO
J�` r. ' f .Yr�li>f 1■ 1•�j{e a rll �f: f'° r• Ali �:*';'7 fa�rf/y
�� ;'i, :I t , � ,' - j. � .�'.� �).qj��� � � 1. •-
[`[` "}�� ��� •, .`•f i' . •'ter,+ �� ��* �T � •'• ;Y• P_"` � r •.a,«1:37,. /�--'+',�'y,Sf,��,Jsu _.e.,.
I+����t \,i � y4L�.}� �t:5!• Ir I{i.�� � � �Y.j�,`�f 1 s'.',�, t � l�' • .. _ ; T•..�• f.
'� �:,� yr ,cr '� ? 4 _ • t�: � +' j.".. • �� ' . ,• �.�
�rS.}i Y' �j�' �y. .j. • r rr f • �e'.
t.i� ; .i .J<.�,�fi'r►a-{`!'��t th i,.. ,rlys, .d -. �? i ,} '^'-.lti ••' J � f , •• `
"t � ti1!'I � r� Y trams ��5;•, .�.�' .��f ... .r-1 t` ` ': a +.
•y�` �);,, �f = Y,t { },l�►��y� (!i , . .r 7 , }•' 1 '�� lam' �• '`• •
�rl ! •r ;;S,a q;', �f "1.�° ?'t : "g ! ....
Ni�"Ih / 4 { :� + i 4 / .• Y;.t '
,,�l3�jY6� f + 1 ����.r �� Ir { +�MT`rfV .'��'� ••;�� t` ty1„i i �... ^}i
4���, �7�'�-S-�fY�{.v`-{r., _,�;rr; ` �I� ( i y ;:�,•.,l,�r.''`st��:,.✓� . J� _ �+G+.-. -v•
' � a .�,�y,; 1�a 1, '�� wl+' ` Ty ''i:=k• y"40'• i• r f d �ytit"Irl +• � ,,_l.�• �• lr rit,+�� i
611
�'(1 ����{�t�f' "'r� _ � �w.i!,t���.•��L=1��fF��'' `�� �. ��• ly��''�'r",.�,�++fir; ,���'`,��.v� �• i .�'�I.�'F".
`' tea,+ y, 1 Y+' .�nr i'. .rTy. 'r+;:,' �F,L i!—_,�yl' �•q,S.'•},� 4 �u �l' 4,i'i, I I •..�i�'r1v'*+' Ay',J.1T , ' F w�•� 1
"l►�• ' ', I...,.f � � 1%i! � ��}�j� {4;, � '.F Q y • �.3 f r/,J ••+} r� �.�. Il• �`LM . � ��. + �'+. •+4 �-�'.�',
'.i•J 1 . f -L Sr,.�; S r+'. r '' i.F/ :.; C;j^ � rl tip.' : � �%• -7y� � t �, .y i
\ I � . � rA �,; / t {:1/ � '' • t ' 115f"" � r[ ,dy p��11 ' • 1 ; I
.; J +. �py1� t �..•,L��,J�i:�`�'.�' �sl '3�-'lG,+�,�.�'i'Y .,� =�.•� v.���i ���5 .��,t�«�`'�'S. r` a `
�5�+7 i Lc'L.',��lh� [��� i:-'r.ti'.r �'q .�, ��1.:.5��-::a='�" /I�� l�,h��r '�+l•��`�"'• �" _ „ _
i.".;err 41� i. 1� yr'f •r�'`��i. F rs',,' auj ` r�,` •r� S
.� u. � . R.t ' �i �� ,! ,�i.����F'�•,.. t..ta /fijd'� 1. ,i,, A. .k 41.\ , .''
it
� .ti �` �e},?�i!• ,�` Y + ? ��y� 1.1y 'T.•`.���,� h�. ✓� � ` a;F.t�.� r w� � � �f � f,�I� •� ., : r ..-JI
�4 �' ^'zi �.�. •it A�#1�,.Y}��� '�="•.T M+, Y.; R '/`i.�! I.t� �•���� i T y�•''Y'fi 'i=,.^� c r 5 T` -i'y ��
1 1'} ' i' "'CC..77 ,,. '_,��•s' • I ,L�` •. �,y« t�,ca: �F. Wit--:',�{,;��l: • (:li .l �:�(/'irr �`' f, t / r , ? r''."�,.
�!e-. ." �=A •.`�' ''Jyrii �'� �,� ,tyl ���['�/',��yet�,.. f4kv��.-.�11 _•,�tir`='���i �-!f-��-,�If,"l-'` ,`��''ll��.,.
��r• � r�'r"'�� �.`•"^� � �~ ' q,��j}�. " -' � , w �'ity �`V �riwLl� ,' ; `�7U'�iF . T`' •'(+¢,��' rl ` ai Y gS6,_ia11 j � ��! /
IfSIC �+' iN�� ,�•lif(,i"{ ..:�`j"'.r, t4 1 1 il�.yr!' 1 _ �I''F�_+ri,•', �,�+ :4`: i
`.aFi ", r, t►•• � �, •.r' �Y y.� -•„t, - � '\fir', I ��i.�! t'•x.,.'� � �w �,.•'.ry
',.,li(Aj 11r ./►i; . �. v. 1 �:z:: � y�'�j(1�.�_ � �+'};�, �., 3„' ray `�i!i:•,,• � �,`i1
i"••fir �' ^."i .. .w _ .__.. /`, �.. --� -�.r.L -.,. ....._.....- � � :' •{JI ,�/ 1�.._ri w. _r, „lyl �r� 1
j�1 lk 1 1 ..^f 1 i'• f �'�• �' � ��t4r � /� jr'�r � �� 1 r � r/�:I
������.�;;,�r�k��.��•t�r i �ilT'.I ri � � , :� 7r�,lY'i� / .,�a�� .�� �",��t � J"/'.11 r ,.f ✓`'� '+v
�!!!{ � �iaa, r• r�� rt r' J�, f , f� F v vY �� 1• • �{1t F• �Er f� �'� � •�`•
k ►'� 6` � � �' i" is��f
1P�� � Yv� ` ����i'if'� �� . ��i J' ���`�' 1 � �. � ! r�1Vj� .s�'?-`4r1`,.� .•�iJ `�.'-. T` '
�ter. '1a V
�� ` bj. �� a�'�yf• A f -
%4y�•j l' .hjF �-y,�f' I��•T ;J�r, n'�, •�y r•.', r!,Ip r.%i�Ft1:d6�*��1''•�9
..- � 1J � �:�r } `•`.\CTr=�!•r�-_•..r ytI � (f5"a3�( .J`,4� r.�.11 a\_ :�.V,�; : r(� �7
��' �'"�4q�� (.I_y .I��t4�t.. ,'� r'f l;J,S .+•'1� I,�..A'�• ••'�l,�rY:� f ,
lip
j' ^•;•', .M1 ,r ' tr• 41�ti,_' �', •ram'Yi, ,'i' r -,
r f� �j ,/ . i •�, ti /� f
rez
Ci , . / / rr4x � •H ��a;4•j�1 � tiJ f� }, � � a,Y•
04 0
'! •, :1 �a 1 ,/► f ' �•, y y � fir' SSk��� ! �y,��
,` RF7 Q `,• .�a.• awn, !j I' , i�'11+:�� "'
t
.'' •� '� 1.1 ,, �<r.. 4+15� • f�ii��, 1.
i )ll ,j-
I �,: '' a 117 G' � ...,.•"t!A'f�,�;�.,��1•

�9 t IdA' r E
Ma8 a8 n •.
`dr JQ '' •':' '' ' i� ` Mal
M `+ Aa8 h 6
e �. •'P lam'
MMeB
aDI�haoz r f
a M 8 T
' e6'
t � } . i„" � ,CFi�'��ar��3 ; � Ch ��• IdA ,�s 1r�, i t r`
Ch o
;�,' .� e e� 4r Ypi . �nq • •... P, oEnu
EnB.•
IA} ti d
EDi
e+R
`�, MeD eq._.G{y ,Meb
�n MeB �a3• ii ` .. a IdA
+? idA ��." ,m MeeBEnO
�G `` + `BQCk.�; a isa Ch• 'i ii CuB2 t,� ,. _
� 'i yM
IdA- En
L9WILCuB 2 It
r . r„ l!-
Y. ! e
LU
a � ��Y L��� -r� •' � 'r� Y�I'• R �
.r "rJ��. •1A tt P
�., • r� _°"�'� .. � �w�� '.sir`••, • *" � ,, , `
AaB-
EnD
a
J `'41�:FS{. "'r s s, � �•'' - .��= ;ems•' i 1
,Jr�J �� :'�.',+� Fitfw} [a t� •" I•i-,:;ir•y � ..7L�4 �.�(a;�.
`�,ra � u�� 9Sl�i���,_5': if pJM• ��•;'v „i�+�, �� _,rn:. t'
!A:• �•f:iir •�`_��ri r• :' i
IF
■ f �1C �i(r5y r3o1'{��.�ry.� r`'". .r�.,y{{i r r� •,�,4'y
J 1�•M �S�; +'��.�[�,'il�{fuf •her, �S�?' t ��s �s;.,y�1r'�i��f�.'lY `f�`'�'�f � ?i�ef.,i J".f'�••� ~{=r

'rti, ,
r ` r a.
. o T.
� � '� n ;f�•'.?�, J' � c �r4 � -\ �+ 1 � Cyr � _-
EP
Rr
94
0/
fJ"' i.sY,'i, ,r a D.. y //I .�- ° Q-/y-✓}-w�
A''I1"nj-.�
� .f+ S•T+�f � * � � � ' „: , ;ti' '�j•� } r7J ;j .�. � , ! x�!r ��i.,a k +k 5,`�� - . •g f�i• _ /
r d f - \' Q ` �3S 1 y� ; # 4 ;i u . ; a to0
JA
t � s j3Y' E ` 1i'_+. y �° � r W 4, ',5 n°`''�` -° �°\ ?. '} S►�i`,- #.il r s
' ✓ R i r 1 " '
fir 'M
✓ `1� ,(„� 1 Q� -. ! f r� i � � � / a e� a �T�„ / � i - '
SS
x^ 0 uCk
„
ch

„fit � � `'� o '��''� � a � ! � ', !t r � `'Xi•`+� � rf 9 � f' � A ` 1 1 �4S
-s AT
Q All
Ally °' f �;�`= L L ��', rl.� >�J � s ' c• •'i•fl�Z_Nt I�-
0 ��. r '� ..t i, 11, 1i�iilli��. _ i�%1. g��'.� i'•. .� �4, ,'/� � � r�rl` � • ��,
i . �"� 1, ��o • Q,:. .r�fl -�' '-` "� � �1r �F�".%. •�"�>r Vy �'r.� •?� '�, 7_ �r�
r 4 j,t j �. i-.7)�LY�a. +!� �.,� ”. SAS 3 `•a-� ` '1. � rN-~l'
AFp7� -A. f
S - s t� �`�! i,�`5 �N' `>( ri "j.'"L *r yjt� r ro �•. j tJ -t, }•a 6 ? t t4 a ���
a a s�?
�l71
.x. ` p : , s, J r.i � _��` 1.:. "�t�' r '�� .� �•° e�.""CC 4 w F' z ,, v, '� �,y9.
mm
WWI
Zip
CA
AA
413
n Now
o U� t�g rt r;nr I� 1 i� �a �ij 7 , Fe. 1 • �o
�>' �t '"!`.� �,F•'i /�'�r���'..�!' t rF �r-a Y Ir �� I ,.,� + r '�a •� ,z
'� . F'• � �� {� ��..`. F, 7'.1�Y5�.1
At���I�lrt��r7i.�'�)
�;.�yl�/a �
3 fk r°".�aA'� S T.r ? ' 17 .7IN,dL
�' '� • 4, �^�. .'C f.. r �r � 1,
al
^•r'4.. r - 1 �/1 J.t.. -ti'% r �. _ ��1� ,l
99. P.9
{ ii; �� �.�'T { Jir°��'��'- () 'P- •����`�,-a�f�'Il' � � � � '� � `? ,�?� /�•�} t'aw .� y �
"VA of
V�, .•rry' ,sy' �. wk .4
'�i
it.+ii 4
- tti� � � = �, � y'i•31'I �'N�t � �J 7J �r-�� r.. 1[71� �J� i �-K �.?�, .Y�,.�,/�l'Y��ke...,.�
° • ) r, 11' �� � ` � ,t' � � n.: `7- s Rl L�l,i/ ! 5 *{� r�r"'. {r^� f"r�I�
Ui ,�, t rC �l�j "•�.�..., ty, ". � �1 p .�� a�°a au'.

CALIBRATION OF MANURE SPREADERS
Effective utilization of manure is not possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a
given area. Calibration of your spreader is a simple and effective way of improving utilization of
nutrients in manure more effectively. Only by knowing the application rate of your spreader can you
correctly apply manure to correspond to your crop needs and prevent water quality problems through
the over application of animal manure.
Applicators can apply manure, at varying rates and patterns, depending on forward travel and/or
PTO speed, gear box settings, gate openings, operating pressures, spread widths and overlaps.
Calibration defines the combination of settings and travel speed needed to apply manure, bedding
or wastewater at a desired rate and to ensure uniform application.
Spreader Capacity
Liquid spreader capacities are normally rated by the manufacturer in gallons. Multiply by 0.0042
to get tons.
Solid and semi -solid spreaders are rated by the manufacturer either in bushels or cubic feet
(multiply bushels by 1.24 to get cubic feet). Most spreaders have two rating capacities: (1) struck
or Ievel full, and (2) heaped. Calibration of solid manure spreaders based on its capacity
(volume) is difficult to estimate accurately because the density of solid and semi -solid manures _.
are quite variable. Density is the weight of the manure per volume of manure ( pounds per cubic
foot). Manure density varies depending on the type and amount of bedding used as well as its
storage method. Therefore, if you estimate spreader application rates as the volume of the
manure the spreader holds you are overlooking the fact that some manure weighs more than other
manure. This can cause a significant error when calculating manure application rates.
Since manures and litters have different densities, an on -farm test should be done. To determine
the load (tons) of a manure spreader:
I . Weigh an empty 5-gallon bucket.
2. FiIl the bucket level full with the material to be spread. Do not pack the material in the
bucket but ensure that it settles similar to a loaded spreader.
�. Weigh the bucket again. Subtract the empty bucket weight from this weight to calculate
the weight of the contents.
4. 'Multiply weight of contents by 1.5 to calculate pounds per cubic feet, density.
OPLNIP--:Mirth 17. 1997--,14n 13

5. Multiply the manure density by the cubic feet capacity of the spreader and divide by 2000
to get the tons of material in a spreader load.
weight of S gal manure x 1.3 x spreader caeac-*- (rt 1)
Spreader load (tons) � 2000
Solid and Semi -Solid .Manure Spreaders
In order to calibrate a spreader for solid manure (20 percent or more solids). the following
materials are needed:
1. Bucket
2. Plastic sheet, taro or old bedsheet. An even size, 3 feet by 3 fee;.. 10 fee: by 10 feet, or 12 feet
by 12 feet, will make calculations easier.
3. Scales
Calibration method:
1. Locate a large and reasonably smooth, flat area where manure can be applied.
2. Spread the plastic sheet, tarp or bed sheet smoothly and evenly on the ground.
A. Fill the spreader with manure to the normal operating level. Drive the spreader at the
normal application speed toward the sheet spread on the ground. allowing the manure to
begin leaving the spreader at an even, normal rate.
4. Drive over the sheet at the normal application speed and settings while continuing to
apply manure. If a rear discharge spreader is used, three passes should be made: first,
drive directly over the center of the sheet, the other two on opposite sides of the center at
the normal spreader spacing overlap.
S. `Neigh the empty bucket and plastic sheet, tarp, or blanket.
4
b. Collect all manure spread on the sheet and place it into the bucket.
7. `Neigh bucket and manure and subtract the weight of the empty bucket and ground sheet.
This will give you the pounds of manure applied to the sheet.
S. Repeat the procedure three times to get a reliable average.
9. Determine the average weight of the three manure applications.
l� �

9
r
10. Calculate the application rate using the following formula or Table 5-3:
Application rate (tons/acre)
lb manure collected x 21.73
sheet length (tt) x sheet width (ft)
11. Repeat the procedure at different speeds andor spreader settings until the desired
application rate is achieved.
Example:
What is the application rate (tons per acre) if you collect 3.5 pounds of manure on a 10-foot by
10-foot tarp during a calibration run?
Application rate (torssrac:e) 3.5 lb manure x 21.7 310 ft x 14 ft a 1.35 tons/acre
Table 5-3. Calibration of Solid Manure Spreaders
Pounds of Manure
Tons of Manure Applied/Acre
Awlied to Sheet
Size of Ground Street
3' x 3' 10' x 10'
12' x 12'
1
0.34 0.22
0.15
2
0.63 0.44
0.30
3
1.02 0.65
0.45
4
1.36 0.37
0.61
5
1.70 1.09
0.76
6
2.04 1.31
0.51
7
2.38 I.52
1.06
S
2.72 1.74
1.21
9
3.06 1.96
1.36
10
3.40 2.13
1.5I
15
5.10 3.27
2.27
20
6.81 4.36
3.03
Many times it may be necessary to adjust the rate in which waste is applied from the way it is
normally spread. Changes in application rate can easily be done by increasing or decreasing the
speed in which the waste is being applied. In order to perform these calculations, the spreader
load (tons), duration of application (minutes), and the average width (feet) of a normal
application needs to be known. The application rate and travel speed can be found using the
following equations:
Application rate (tons/acre) . spreader load (tons) x 495
time (min) x width (ft) x travel speed (mph)
spreader load (tons) x 495
Travel speed (mph) ' time (min) x width (ft) x application rate (ton"cre)
OPUMP--North ! 7, 1997-o73;e _0

Example:
What speed should you run if you wish to apply 4 tons of manure per acre with a 3-ton spreader?
Your spreader application width is 20 feet and ,your spreader empties in 6 minutes.
Travel speed (mph) - 3 tons x 493 = 3, i moh
6 min x 20 it x 4 tonstacre
Spreader Pattern Uniformity
To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed. place a line of small
pans or trays equally spaced'(2 to 4 feet) across the spreader path. The pans should be a
minimum of 12 inches by 12 inches (or 15 inches in diameter), but no more than 24 inches by
24 inches; and 2 inches to 4 inches deep. Viake one spreading pass directly over the center pan.
Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the contents into equally sized glass cylinders or
clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each.
The effective spread width can be found by Iocating the point on either side of the path center
where manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. The distance
between these points is the effective spreader width. The outer fringes of the coverage area
beyond these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a uniform rate over the
entire field. "Flat -top," "pyramid," or `oval" patterns are most desirable and give the most
uniform application. ";vi," "W," "steeple," or "lopside" patterns are not satisfactory and one or
more of the spreader adjustments should be made.

Mortality Management Nlethods
(check which mechod(s) are being implemented
Cy Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture r
:=1 Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 15. 1996

Suurce Cause !rn•tl's to Minimize Udur Site Specific Practices
Lilt staliuns Agitation during sump lank ❑ Sump lank covers .
Iillitig alai drawdown - N R
1:11d fif diainpiper at 9 Agilalion daring wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
labnun conveyancc lagoon liquid level NA
Laguna -;III races 0 Volatile gas emission; 0 Proper lagoon liquid caluncily;��—
• Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon sinrlup procedures;
• Agilalium ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Vr Minimums agitation when pumping;
0 Mechanical neratiou;
17 Proven biological additives
h6ptium sprinkler •. I Iigh pressure agitaliun; ir, lrr'ignle on dry days wilh little or no %vied;
males Wind drill ❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure;
D Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
Pump from second -stage lagoon;
W" Flush residual mtauurtrc from pipes at cud of
slurry/sludge pumpings '
Dead annuals Carcass decuntposilion Proper disposition of carcasses
Staudiuig Avalcr around • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that, water drains
tncilitics . Microbial decomposition of away From facilities
orgarr'rc Inatter
Mud Uscked onto Public • Poorly maintained access roads t7 Fartn access road maintenance
roads from Imm access
Addilional h+futmation : Available From :
Cattle Maome Managemcid ; 0200 kule/BlAP Packet NCSU, County Extensiun Center
Wiry Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Read Field Laboratory, EDAE 209-95 NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and hlanagemew fur Livestock Mamure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAri
hiam Lmucnl of Dairy Wastewater: EBAF I06.83 NCSU - DAE
Cafthratiun of Manic and wastewater Application Equipment; LBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - DAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Managenieut: Odors and Flies ; . PROM, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
ANK uvernber 11. 1996, Page 2 r

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source C:lnse 13f►11's to AlGtlnlite Odor Site Specilir 1'ncclices
I a,msl�ad Dairy ploducliuu 11 Vegetative or wooded buffers
O Vtccommendcd best managctnent practices
Q/ Good judgment and common sense
fared lots lrr bans alley • Wet manurc-coveted surlaccs Scrapc or Bush daily
5111 I:ll'L'S
O Promote drying wills proper ventilation
Cl Routine chucks and maintermoce on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stuck larks
1lcddcd alcas
0
Ul ine
FRr1'rolnute drying with proper ventilation
•
Palfiai microbial decomposition
Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
�hlanulc dl y sImks
•
1'al lial 111iC1'ollial dcculllpositioll
i'rovidc liquid drainage ror stored manure
Slowgc tank m basin
•
I'mlial microbial decomposition ;
❑ 11ollmn or mid-Iml loading
5111race
•
Mixing while filling ;
0 Tauk covers
•
Agitation when emptying
❑ ' Basin surface mats of solids;
Vr.Minimim lot runoff and liquid additions
19"' Agitate only prior to manurc removal
❑ -Proven biological additives or oxidams
Sculillg 11:ISIn surfaces
l':utial Microbial decomposition
0 Liquid drainage. Isom settled solids
•
Mixing while tilling;
C3 Remove solids regularly
Agitation when emptying
pk
_
Nimmie, slurry or sludge
Agitation when spreading
❑0 Soil injection of slurrylsludgcs
shlca[lel. UHIICIS
•
Volatile gas emissions
L Wash residual manurc from spreader after use
❑ 11tovcn biological additives or oxidants
tlncumcd 11MIMlr,
•
_
Volatile gas emissions Mile
❑ Soil injection of slurrylsludgcs
shnry 111 Sludge 1m field
drying
'❑J Soil incorporation within 48 hrs
Sul IflCcs
1s�1 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
blush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon O Mush lank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Extend Sill lines to uenr bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents N, A'
. Outside Blain collection • Agilativit during wastewater ❑ Box covers
01 juncliull bUxcS collveyrincc
AMOY00"4�',cluber 11, 1996, Pale I ��
o u

Suarce Cause BM. to Control Insects Site Slrccilic Practices
Animal I luldinb Aicas Accwmilatiuns ul'animal wastes O Eliminate low areas that trap moisture Along
and feed wastage fcuces and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
1minimal. '
® Maintain fence rows and filler strips around
animal holding areas to nrinio1i7C
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or breakup accumulated solids as
Ui y Alantnc I landlinb Accnnmlaliuns of.mimal wastes Cl Remove spillage on n routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systcros day interval during suinmer; 1 S-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposai.
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
O - `Insimct for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handliug areas as needed.
For mute iufinmation contact the cunperalive Extension Service, Ucparlment of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AA -II -tuber 11. 1996, rage 2 `, r

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
�Suurcc C:+usc
BMI's to Control insects
Site Specific 1'radiccs
Liquid Systenls
F111511 Grultels • Accumulation of solids
❑ flush system is designed and operated
so,"e, 1�S a�-
suff iciently to remove accumuhted solids Rom
Ice-" 5ot� gs
gutters as designed.
f-1 Remove bridging oraccumulatcd solids at
ivc�o 1no1.A.: Qo>n�.S.
discharge
La-Uu11s a11d rlts • i lUStl't1 S(tllll5
❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits wheiC
(:iDMnR�..�rl. o►a�f,�e►tk-+t+ev1
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
a„�a =.pw,�s vy� ofk- td1i�5
crusting orsolids to a depth of no morc than G -
3 inches over more than 30%orstlrrace.
Qvw.Qtv►o,
Excessive VegOalive • Decaying vebetatiun
❑ Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Glowth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation or decaying vegetative matter
along %vater's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Fccdcrs feed Spillage ❑ Design, operate and luainiain feed systems (e.g..
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
vccunlulation ordecaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Stol age Accumulations of Iced residues ❑ Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of reed storage
areas by Insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (c-g.,
covered bin for brewces grain and similar high
moisture grain products). .
9( inspect ror and reinove or break up accumulated
solids ill tiller strips around reed storage as
needed.
nn1► vembcr 11, 1996, rage t (,P� /046�

.4. 1-
'rt
J.J
l.. J
y4-
th
LL
70 r
bl CA
h.4.
14

n
a'.
,r•. ,. .. ...,. .F.. _ „•., o.........,.i ti f.�.I: 1.fiP:.f�-I..:uii,..rx,r:,:.r..��,r.tti.: ars.. , ^. r:c-,,':i zrw.:ti f* N«t t "',t w.1-,41''v.'ti�'lDl4`>@��iri,�+jFSn•.R!-»,:pa::r..;l.,:l.�".--�•=-'-�•�=.sit,.1, '�31�'W:�" :/ '3'-! ... a,� F : ' :_� ! I � ��QQpp .I i.l , � � F 1 1 { e � iW)•? � I •1 � :,: f r. ' , ' �, ' Y
' ' a i 1 '�_ `' f I � T ` .I 1 _.. _ .-t _ ,!•i_! F ''r• .i.- I� - _i.i ` :�� ' _ •,
d+
SS
� .7. .. . r •'f •�.f,� �1i'r- j -! ii-f � � •� •IQ �`•{ Cr-� -rJ.
i. i I ; +i: t''!•( i_� ( ,'i 1 i :� { �rl {�1tk �1 1 i(r(
. l,.q..l ��. i.^� .3 •i .; 1 1 1 ' ,,€ j I I , �.!�,'}, .�-�' T_�., tr��, 1 ! i_ , .l •.r Ir��:Fk:i-� i"�f. , +3
. .� r � i I i � } I y � �' } ' F ! • _; ! �-�� .T � i 1 I � �i—" a
. .. .( , - •i-.3 ii .-f .i ..�.. t. 1 - ! , r .' .. .1•.1 .l,_I _i.,_1�1. 1 .F L..L • r ! � 1 •i ', • `.
' •�• ! ; � .� I 1 ~• ! F _, i E 1 1 . L .3 � , , i -( �' , i I f_ i -I ' l ` +
j .i f I j •r _. r i � 1 + .I 1'�'1i , •�_ -� •1_ •�-: �' , '! I '•r i I `! f',- - F i
, 5--. , , .j .i j._i - � i � ', ! ., , �/� .�.. �r _, 'i �'� � : 1( : ' '+ j I ; : ii • i
€ i i i {.. i { ? , j i ; i I . i I •1 i •, - .� •1 ,� � 'r I f i ��~ I 1-; •E .j -_ .� � ,
'
, ...� I. +_ "t !•_l _{._+-_r h. f, , ? ;._; ..r , .. j ! i( y� � �•f _I ,�....�., .j .i..�.�.� _I
' -i 1'r I-+•+ I, 1 F i ] l rf, AS,
-, •( � t I ; ,' , 11 .���:.,� ,..a \1`..F. .r .i .i �'•j - - rt}�,' r �S•;}'•f�.• 'I
• ! + ' • 1 : _... �. i j � i _l. I ..: i ? _ .; i , i � : ; _� ' � I .'1� .It'i' - i• I —�� ' -€ i ! r 1 j � I � '� � �i � -� . i �.Ji'•�JJ. I � _ .i
SN
011
• ' - - � ' € ,( E.:{_j 'j .F. { .j f 1 � ` -_ i { �! � . i � ' h� � .�. i ' i f ! ,� ' ; �� ` ! �'t ��(9 .itL•� I:.�,rrr row
1' I -� - i F. •11 v1 ; -I' ` I T (�, IV Y`! _, - ' •.' a '..}-j ' 1 I 1?
,,,.1�; II I '_ i-}�! '• .�_.11�• ! II�_�.i� 1J !'� �1 , i I{
1 .{ ,I .,�. J-•f ,_.! ` L +_ :, .�. i rA it j r y I + ' �D } • �i -,. , 4 _�. . r. �..i .iw. I 1 +�
, I ' 1 I j ` )I� i � 1 , � { � f , i 4 '� g .i I ,� -T . I . i � �'� ; � { ' •�•. � i 1 I S-.� . i (_.� (J �
i! i r I..! i I{ •, f r 1 _, ' y' .1 3,`t r { i€ S�' § .,
1 i' T E• ti s , , s a I t � -4 ' .1, € I ! � �1 .9. ! I i 1 F ;. ( ' � 1 , _' 1 •�•-I _� I � r t � �ka
i !
:{
• - I � 1. '� s '�i ; ... � i � , i i � � �1 i 3 ' i y - • -y + , f } a Y
f . r . , �•''_.1 ,. F... • j 1 _ •(• ! f K ! a:
' : 1 1 '• i.Or-� �. .0 i i i• I"_ � -I„r r 111 '�' • i 'I �
10
t I I � i j t �. .., f � f !. _ � r €•�-1 _�� � 1'i i � �� 1-E. �- -�' '_ �.1 i•;��.:I-;•--�.; . ;
I I € s €. i f r 1 t J t-.1 fit_€• r t f_ ,
_7._
f t i � i.i j'!_I r I � { ,1 , 1•-� �• 'ram ( f i'i�r `- i ' ( 1 = t j {R ( ��: (_S.i = T' I ,
♦ o i - :'! ! (`q•� ir
1141
r--- I i • I 1 ; i ! !- i� 1 i '• �'^ �i _f t- 't' _ ' •_, _.'-_:_ ,� r,
,..1 �.. . r
i{ t ., y j :� ; •y , .. ! j y�.1 I I 3 I i f f'i , 1 1 I �r 11 i 5
1 a I_ jj, �. _ 1 1 i i fj � L j am•; � r I} f i �11 t�• I i�( i t F.. ,. I i- I i^ 1' ' �' � j i s li
' - I I t i �•1.4..i �'"I } i 11;( I..' ! :�1 F. I F I �( %•�•�- ( I 1 � I �_ ' I _�I, 1 I i r e h
I 1!
I� r# i 1 1 f ►'! 1 i 1 1 i_ i s
• ', r 1 + � i.^C.S_}_1 r I i:..T r f •_ £ ,� + ! S i..s # �}; rqr• '�. _ ; � Y^''"!"i I�'}"-' '—� _ �
t-{ • 1.�._r...i_! ; 1 !.; i.r-• :�•; ! ' i '� 'O ..r,,�`' ; �' /€-7.� �. 1.1l��.3�.�_I_� � r
�I slSr:1' I s:=it.
' 1- �• i I ...�
�
i i - i i ,_ jY� �A
' : -(' -r•.i i ' 1 I•w
r' ; r'i ! .l 1 ' F� I •v��` ��• �_ r t ; -
._. . • , ., . _�_ _I '_�- � ; �' ;.. , r : 3 � i ii r 1• i��-�-,. ;: f : � .�. 11 i Jp � , '1 _ i-1.L 1-'-i � _
! I I ' ! � 11..1.I 1 1 ! I '.J-; I j i , i �' a i i li'- I .•; ! (. � ' j` 1 '��, ;•1 S'S'r� I-r 1 � [ -' � I i "f j- I � 1 i r �',U}• � (�; �' { : � I �"; ! I� I\ � _�_..4 r �_�IT
.• s '
+. ' i i -1_i ! e , r �-I• -} !• r ;.i_E.,�:. ; I �., i I. '�►,.�.�~ i� J � i - ! I G
., ; ; I"3•_ .�`r-.T _ 1.. I r y. i. I_ i. i..y E Y !. ,�. ..(�,! L. �, l.. i...i._!. �-� ,. .;- �-F-`- �.- •\`_i..l
. � r j '. ;- I } ! ' •1• y � .!. ' r
(�t i _I
1 r i.. i j -J- F I 1' j j I �• • r• ' 1 r E{` + . j� t` i i_ If'i I_. 1: 1 i ,�~ { 1• O
4,. �;-[ � � ( ' 1 i r i (._i_• �_• 1• '1� L (. j :O +•
• I' .,, j'. i, LJ.� 1 i �' i ?,# 1 I ; f i i i' j-•f ••Il' i_1!•::Ii I- 1 1 i r '..;WL
,, li p i ! i'• '1 I I �! "!. !MF I I I_'- i i : !�' \1-' fit. i ' �1S �+ 1•�
• � A r ! i..':.. � ! : , 1 ; r '` 1 _ •-- �� i_ ^� '�,�i, I : ' + I ja 1 O: t \ .1 r
_ I ' .. t';' h !' i -:,: �f �. • i I ' 's � '� 1 yt
r , I _ , f r-1 1 •. I- . y ��••' t• i. 57.�•..! ':T' I.
Zb
F�I.i�, �' , � f + ; E � ( : I .{..�-�=i +-,-4^'{t_'}• f-� , ,•,, ._,i ' , r ...-� -i•-r-r;..=�A• pN� _.
1 I r, i j , ;f _ • _.. �. , .1.. j`_..f . r r i i i , I 1 � I `,' ". $
c !
j.• 1 ", i i' �' �, I .!_ I_,_j +' i"i f ' i--4=i• ' i i' V 'i A. i, I (•,
. 1 ,
� I I ,
1 L i j t }....'_ , �: t , I ; '! I• , ' 1- -i :.1...,..;!_?..,.}...i—.� �
' � 5 ; � ' i-i•' r � ! r f i, � ;�, ��• � I:{.�_ .j� � f-_•i-�'. �-.! .i '.i f 1 -i-- --� -�-j
i ' , ' , + :.€ � ( , S f � i , I ' } �'• ! i � i- , ; cyt • ; I ! r j _' r i i J I �_.�

S

Li. S. C)rPAF,?Thtt--NT Of'
SOIL CONSERI'47-00N SF'RVoCE.'
. T -A
'O-A 7 C L�4 1- 4 3
9- wc \)rj\Qv,^C.
L aer
4 1
1-4
cr
AAi -
0i
F-55h--
IF
I
r
go
Q0 rs
it g! -f—

CC MPUTAT.R.'I SHE7r',
'E C L _,'O�v SERVICE
S TA TE
C /_4AP_K HAP'Zis �-Alm2p_,05�__to
BY iYA TE_ Poe plo,
-77 1
SUBJECT
-S) 7- C- P*STS ST pi, HEE-,.-., OF
ILM A
7-pT '2- MO
AN2 A!i --f P-1 0 '___nP
T
t 'A
E*q0F_qLS___lw U, _CO,N)GeT__ N5 Fr 0
L
7
L
07-MOM JE, L
66,
P-
Ru A OFF_FAO ry J! ZGyj�.-.24Ap �p
f,
'I33C.Fs�_�0:54) 78_�Fs_- -T 5E
cF
35, 0
C-j'_ A-1) WAIZTF. PINE