Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout130007_PERMIT FILE_2017123111 r� '�a?" -w t._r: - , i. 3t � F •z.. 'a. - T F :� -..-' i ateOua'i.. � ��'s. r•: r, e5:.`L- � c- ? Wlrty., a r �.z 1 }t ar ti. p � ,✓ Fac><I>tty Nutritier 3 O ` r ` 0,biVIsIon,of Soil end Water' Cogserval3on; ` te a r..H.. t "Kii ! - no, Y.. � - q Qt he r`Agency r_ Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 4 Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ,CQN� Region: Farm Name: �`�' �j��1 .. ��COwner Email: Owner Name: _ `'�` y Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: e j_ __ ___ Operator Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: [=o �' `� Longitude: =o =' = 11 ( 44�\- Jt cq� Design f "Current '` Design Current _ -Design` 'Current" . Swine Y Capacity Population Wet Poultry. Capacity ',Population Cattle 'Capacity, Population" LJ Wean to Finish ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts 'Other. ❑ Other ❑ Layer ❑ Non -La et Dry Poultry ❑ Layers ❑ Non -Layers ❑ Pullets ❑ Turkeys ❑ TurkeyPoints ❑ Other Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Q;Rg-Cow EMairy Calf ❑ Dairy Heifer ❑ Dry Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Cow c. What is the estimated volume that. reached waters of the State (gallons)? Number of Structures: d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes CN ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No"�NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No bQNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No N:�A ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Ye ElNA [INE 12128104 Continued Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o V�A A El NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE Structurq l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identiiier: r Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in,): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Y o NA [I NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA � NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need []Yes []No ❑ NA EINE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes []No ❑ NA UNE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) []PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window []Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? - - ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination %❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA CINE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE . r;,; :�i.•Y.w'?r 7'..ri�Yr� +1'i. .. �r :� - �`,`,y{¢,V�]f."r t �. -`{' a..s . .. Myri`v_!, +�t'y i s,"';,+nei� �tE!i1'_ .iiH", Y .L.� _'�_ .��i _='�: • f4 .r'�^I'4 � hY�� - .. a:y�. Y y}W�,ev; ;?w 'i� fi.C. 1f�ItY• �l,.iE".. 2..� -q ..may .,�,µ1 i•C'�3K .:i�� 1-\a �.� �'.d.S�+Y �F Reviewer/Ins ector Name "" , .;� ¢ : r� Jk� �, =;`t s "� r ;r ' *" p F y.. �; � s w t. Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 12128104 Continued M Facility Number: — _ Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NI, ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certif cation ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather C de 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Sr'. «{��. .i}r- 3.�-r' :LV E,`. i k�-.4.. i - �. �Zc i it 5 �:'_f"ij, i',v h 4` 'S -•.!. '',} i, RS Y}{ l si A Additionai Comments'and/ortDrs►din S � �}�� ,� x; �' i. ^r :e-'> � '�.% "'���'�'"� ` � '�y=cHF'� !^" 4 12128104 January 11, 2008 Joe Harris Harris Dairy 1643 Pembrook Road Harrisburg, NC 28075 Subject: Rescission of Animal Waste Permit Certificate of Coverage No. AWC130007 Cabarrus County Dear Mr. Harris: Michael R Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Coleen H. Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality D Jai 3 0 2008 ------------- NC DENR MRO DWQ - Aquifer Protection Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Staff from the Mooresville Regional Office have confirmed that this Coverage is no longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No. AWC 130007 is rescinded, effective immediately. If you again wish to operate an animal waste management system you must first apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day, Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 if it would be helpful to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, oleen H. Sullins CHS:tlbltjs cc: Andrew Pitner, Mooreville Regional Office Technical Assistance and Certification Unit AP5 Central Files Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office None la J atura�fy North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Maii Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (919) 733-7015 Customer Service InbEn t a mv.nDAeletaluality.org 512 N. Salisbury St. • Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX (919) 733-2496 1-877-623-6748 An E*A Q p hrWAffirr v ive Action Em0byer-50-/6 % ded110% Post Carwrt;r raper [Fwd: Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure] Subject: [Fwd: Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure] From: James Bealle <james.bealle@ncmail.net> Date:: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:59:03 -0500 To: andrew.pitner@ncmail.net fyi... Jb Subject: Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure From: William McClellan <WDMcClellan@cabarruscounty.us> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:26:31 -0500 To: "James.B ealle@ncmail. net" <James.Bealle@ncmail.net> Mr. Bealle, I am sending you the notification that Harris Dairy Farm 13-07 in Cabarrus County has started his waste pond closure. Soil samples and waste samples have been taken and Mr. Harris plans to start spreading as soon as possible. Two new waste samples were taken today and Mr. Harris will spread according to his waste closure plan. Thanks, Daniel McClellan Cabarrus SWCD 704-920-3301 DISCLAIMER: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. James Bealle <iames.bealle(a),ncmail.net> Environmental Specialist NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS r 11 Content -Type: message/rfc822 Harris Dairy farm Waste pond Closure Content -Encoding: 7bit 1 of 1 11/21/2007 12:59 PM J f Division of Water Quality n Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 130007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC130007 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Co=1jancg Inspectogn Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Moor „gville Date of Visit: 05/16/2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM_ Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident ##: Farm Name: Harris Dai[yInc.Owner Email: Owner: Harris Dairy Inc_ Phone: 704-455-2476 Physical Address: Facility Status: 0 Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' j7'42" Longitude: &Q°36'05" From the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2 mile, Farm is on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Joe B Harris Operator Certification Number: 21594 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone On -site representative Joe B. Harris Phone., 704-455-2476 24 hour contact name Joe B. Harris Phone: 704-455-2476 Primary Inspect Inspector Signa Secondary Insp Inspection Summary: 24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event. Facility is currently in the process of closure. ib Phone: Date: (� 16, 7 Page: 1 0 Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc Inspection Dale: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number : 130007 Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Cattle Cattle -Milk Cow 200 0 Total Design Capacity: 200 Total SSLW: 280,000 Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard k1sle Pond WP1 18.00 48.00 Page: 2 � a r t Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Hams Dairy Inc Facility Number: 130007 Inspection Date: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 01111 If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n ■ ❑ o B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ n Q improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ Page: 3 Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc Facility Number: 130007 inspection Date: 05/16t2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Cl PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 ibs.? Total P205? ❑ Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? D Application outside of application area? Q Fescue (Hay, Pasture) Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ 0 Plan(CAWMP)? 151 Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 ■ ❑ 0 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ Q 18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Q ■ Q D Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ 11 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ■ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc Facility Number; 130007 Inspection Date: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? ❑ Design? n Maps? ❑ Other? ❑ 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ Q If yes, check the appropriate box below, Waste Application? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? Q Weather code? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Transfers? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly? Q Waste Analysis? . ❑ Annual soil analysis? Q Crop yields? ❑' Stocking? ❑ Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? n 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? i❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n ❑ ■ ❑ 24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ■ Q ❑ ❑ 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ ❑ D 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Q ■ ❑ Other issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? Q ■ ❑ ❑ 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 ■ ❑ ❑ mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ 0 Quality representative immediately. Page: 5 Permit: AWC130007 Owner - Facility: Harris Dairy Inc Facility Number: 130007 Inspection Date: 05/1612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Other Issues Yes Ma NA NE 31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q 013 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? 0 0 Q 33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ■ Q Page: 6 06-04-'07 11:26 FPOM- 7047956432 T-177 P001 F-754 715 Caherrus Avenue West; Concord, NC 28027-6214 Telephone: 704-920-3300 Fax: 704-795-6432 To: raPs From: Fax: Pages: Phone:- Re: CC: 0 Urgent ❑ For Review G Please Comment ❑ Please Reply 0 Please Recycle e Comments: �Ar�� S free bool"d kx-v-'� a 06-04-'07 11:26 FROM- 7047956432 T-177 P002 F-754 � WASTE POND/LAGOON FREEBOARD AND AVAILABLE STORAGE CAPACITY" Permit Owner Operate JMWMMMMM FROM 1. Freeboard plus available storage capacity is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon/storagc pond embanlanent and the level of liquid. Vor lagoons/storage ponds with spillways, the difference between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should be recorded. 2_ Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded weekly in inches. 3. Recording rainfall in inches is highly recommended but not required unless specifically required as a condition of the facility's animal waste management plan or permit. 4. Optional: Sketch your lagoon(s)/storage pond(s) and the direction the wastewater flows fi-om the houses to the lagoons on the back. NCi7ENR/DWQ: FbC2 form �� ' -�, i ^� E ,h r �, .9��.�w'T.s:.xu,w �7•'+ «�Pt � . G?`�,u;�• ,agmk Wr-' �. .,.s, �,�,� •r �., �� � F diDivialnn_nt Water !}utility w... rH.. ua ca�x Y Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visi , Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: fj a,/ 5- Region: MOM Farm Name: r1 4 - Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: ED o E Longitude: 0 0= 4 -°+] , S .lFt Z* 7;� 3( J- ; G Desi ` q _� ]" r l� 4 ,:. - �l; 1 R�.y.�. 3+ { • Design Yam. ' t•i a n p Current - Curr0, y �� Design. Current, tier B z r hw ^\ .-• ',.,5 4 1{. Swine Capacity ..,, is ` v x .. Population, +f�'ti'et Poultry Population { .� Y l t... ,. ' h S Y5Cattle F r Capacity" Population �f >Cpacrty ❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ne ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -La er ❑ Feeder to Finish x ; �r : w ❑ i°-i Farrow to Wean I „Dry Poultry . ❑ Farrow to Feeder - - ❑ La ers ITT] Farrow to Finish 4 ❑ Gi3ts N ❑ Nan -La ers ❑ Boars El Pullets ' }a r yr 3 <> ❑ Turke s do.A'.''N` Y ❑ TurkeyPuults ❑Other ❑ Other a $'9 Number of Structures �^ wfn z 7^,. r � .� ,, ,�„'S r rrt c 4 :? t� y k'ti ' ✓i �l � +�4� ":.,cr \. }� era ��3 :,3 � � Lt��r' ti Dai Cow Dai Calf ❑ Dai Heifer ❑ D Caw ❑ Non -Dal ❑ Beef Stocker El -Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Cow Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �,No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other. , a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA " ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify. DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes I�,No ❑ NA ❑ NE other than from a discharge? 12128104 Continued Facility Number: — Date of Inspection+ts�can. Waste Collection & Treatment - 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes MkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: 0-- Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? []Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE . (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes DhNb ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? r If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �],No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA WE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA R$NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EE-NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination's ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [a NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N[No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes '7 No ❑ NA [I NE re. C 0,,j 5 eta r 5 0 U 0( f � � Gt eat �4• �r a- � .saiG vw . �l 1� C Reviewer/Ins ector Name t�sa..n '° ;;'sl h.c?�,;� Phone: p U�. ,. Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Gf,L, _ij ,�Date: /Z/%6 /0( IZ128/04 - "Continued E Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents 19. E+id the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑Other ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA hNE . . ❑ Yes- ❑ No ❑ NA OkNE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the' permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yesi [RVo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [9NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA .I NE ❑ Yes ❑ No [KNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA CANE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ME ❑ Yes 9INo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [ 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes El NA ❑ NE Yes ElILT ,,+&�No No ❑ NA ❑ NE "K7 6V tit' 01 ev .S' e'p t c G�(Ci ! • C.�Gt 5 !2% /mil O) �� d'i 12129104 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director Division of Water Quality, October 1, 2004 pC i 9 2004 Harris Dairy Inc. Harris Dairy Inc. MC rrc 1643 Pembrook Road am m'� YugA6- Harrisburg NC 28075 InI�ORi i , 2. �n�:�ri'r10E Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWCI 30007 Harris Dairy Inc. Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Cabarrus County Dear Harris Dairy Inc.: On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28). In accordance with your application received on March 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harris Dairy Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC130007 which expires October 1, 2004. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Harris Dairy Inc., located in Cabarrus County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keenins? andmonitoringconditions in this permit. If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One NorthCarolina Phone: 919-733-32211 FAX: 919-715-05881 Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc,us ;Vaturaliff An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility. Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215:6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (704) 663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at (919) 715-6698. Sincerely, for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ce's) Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section Cabarrus County Health Department Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File AWC130007 APS Central Files r� 4 Type of Visit 99 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit ARoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑Denied Access Date of Visit: f; ' es Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: Farm Name: St4Y AAt F) f 3J ;ri r Owner Email: Owner Name: _ .._ S 14'1�tP` S Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to Finish L j Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts Other ❑ Other Integrator: Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: Latitude: = o = 6 = Longitude: = ° ❑ d Design Current Design Current Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Fon-Layet--t— a er ' I �i I 1 Dry Poultry Non-L Pullets Poults Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? Design Current Cattle Capacity Population [� Dairy Cow Oo ❑ Dairy Calf ❑ Dairy Heifer ❑ Dry Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Cow Number of Structures: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE ❑ NA 55 NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 91 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 12128104 Continued Facility Number: —7 Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: mAc • Spillway?: N O Designed Freeboard (in): 100 Observed Freeboard (in): 3S 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No � NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) COILij 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 23 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. -Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VS No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE Reviewer/Inspector Name "�"f Phone: Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 05 12128104 Continued Facility Number: 173 — r7 Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [K Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropiiate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps ❑Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [RNA ❑ NE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE Addit�onul Gomments.and/o`r Drawings + �� yf' } r-*Cvv% has 6.4- }`i+r►s'41) rr f c+ r*5* Z-3 X46000. Mrt. is r�s w +os wo f A.*f.& OF r+• q u Y i4 o,pjs . 45W a A's 4. 1- ®tl s.. �..rA-4 ow't µ.—As �- C w•' I I $. OFt..!ORk wA') a1rr... a.- P'sR rLA+�,/J �4S ;phi.+/ 100kr Va). 12128104 Michael F. Easley, Governor r William G. Ross. Jr -Secretary �+ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Akan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality WATER QUALITY SECTION July 27, 2003 Mr. Joe Hams Harris Bros. Dairy 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, NC 28075 Subject: Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007 Cabarrus County, NC Dear Mr. Harris: Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 23, 2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be adequately operated and maintained. It was also noted that improvement in record keeping had been made from the previous year. However, the following deficiencies need to be addressed • The storage pond embankments require general maintenance (mowing, etc.). • On the waste application form the operator and facility information must be included. • A copy of your permit and certification form must be available during the inspections. A copy of the inspection report is enclosed. If you have any questions concerning the report, .please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. cc: File PHONE (704) 663-1699 FAX (7D4) 663-6D40 Sincerely, Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 116 ZDER Customer Service 1 800 623-7748 IF Division of. Water QualIty4, Division of 5oi! ead Water Conservatio O O'ther Agency;; '� .. -,r.v- ". :'.,• r„c: Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason far Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: 07/23/2003 Time: Facility Number 13 07 tp Not O erafional 0 Below "Threshold ® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ... -..- ...... Farnt Name: Harms.Hatt'yAnc.................................................................... County: C�abArruS ............................... MQ........ Owner Name: I�CI�1?�IYKIAC.._.---------------------- Phone No: 794:455:�474._----------------------._._.. �tailirtg.address: �G.I'�nnbr.�a.t;,a�td........................................................................ I�latriiklttrg..P.?C................................................... 1.A�5.............. FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No: ....................... Onsite Representative: di21~.ARRGS_._._._._._•------_._----------._._--- Integrator: ---------------------------------------_-_- Certified Oper•ator:J.9.p.B. ..................................... IjArrb ............................................... Operator Certification Number:21S .4 ............................. Location of Farm: From the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2 mile. Farm is on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord. .— ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S • 17 42 Longitude 1 80 10 36 0-57 Current awsuc ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feedei ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity population Cattle capacity Population ❑ Layer 10 Dairy 200 120 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity200 Total SSLW ; 2809000 Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagvon Area ❑Spray Field Area Holding Pond's / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System Dischar_1es & Strcam Int pacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is obser�-ed, did it reach Water of the State'' (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. li'discharge is observed, what is the estimated ilm"' in -0min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No VVaste Collection &_'Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 SU'ucture 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ............. I. . ..-.2....-•--•-... .......................... ........................... ........................... ........................... Freeboard (inches): 24 22 t V✓/V✓/VI Facility Number: 13-07 Date of Inspection 07/23/2003 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes ® No immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No N1'aste Anpiication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No 12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Hay) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No 20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No 22. Fail to notify -regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) I ❑ Yes ® No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ®No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No 113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. -+*7we�,.:ap.. ws....hd^.r•m ," .. • r. - .. .. _ • _,. ... -.. •F,r..� .,+`s"!'rfi, an"^""I-..•-^tx •• rtS:•r. �wz.: •� •n ,d 4�� ""'+� ��a�4s ,Cammeuttid(retcr�to question #)� Ezplaln any YES answers andlor. any,recommeadaionti or any other comments: �: ; �p m•�x«r¢ r _ . .. a:re....t.,�c ;��ss+:_.:is!' .i3-hF.. ,Use drawin��gjs of flYacility1 to baea,�tter eipEain sifuatIans (useyadditianal page's�as necessary) ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes z ' �, .'. ry: "k �^.w3 .H�w'h:,�w+'vY.�.'F�Ysw- X'„��e .s3.�. ...h \ .G.'. Y`. .. �.hr,-�l h:IVr,.�.-.-n..-v-.r�.T�n....;w•. ---THE STORAGE POND EMBANKMENTS REQUIRE GENERL MAINTENANCE. ---DURING AN rNSPECTION THE PERMIT AND FARM CERTIFICATION FORM SHOULD ALSO BE AVAILABLE ---ALTHOUGH THERE WAS IMPROVEMENT IN THE WASTE APPLICATION RECORD KEEPING, INFORMATION SUCH AS OPERATOR SIGNATURE, FACILITY NUMBER, ETC. SHOULD ALSO BE COMPLETED. Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan 3ohson Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: v 0� W Ar�9IAch, rF.Easley `DC� pG Governor CO William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary ?: ; r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Reaouross Alan W. Kilrnek,' Director .Division of Water Duality WATER QUALITY SECTION August 6, 2002 CERTIFIED MAIL 7001 2510 0005 0288 0081 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Joe Harris Harris Bros. Dairy 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, NC 28075 Subject: Notice of Violation Inadequate Records/Files Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007 Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection Cabarrus County, NC Dear Mr. Harris: Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 5, 2002. Based upon the inspection and a review of your files, this letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) for the following violations: • Failure to adequately keep a record of the weekly freeboard levels of the waste storage ponds. .• Failure to provide information regarding the annual soil analyses for the year 2001. • Failure to conduct a waste analysis of the waste applied during the fall of 2001. Failure to follow the'requirements of the certified farm plan and to maintain and provide complete records is a .violation of Section Ill of your Certificate -of Coverage AWC 130007, pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 OC. It is requested that a written response be submitted by September 21, 2002 indicating your actions to correct the noted violations. Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson. It is requested that your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as the facility number. N Aft Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresvfile, NC 28115 PHONE (704) 663-1699 1 800 623-7748 FAX (704) 663-6040 Page 2 Harris Bros. By copy of this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local District Soil and Water Conservation Service, DWQ is referring this facility for technical assistance, if appropriate. if you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, o. Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Cabarrus County SWCD Compliance/Enforcement Unit Regional Coordinator File Date of isit: 9/5/10112 Timc: Facility Number 13 7 O Not Operational Q Below Threshold ® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered , Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ... __ __ _..... Farm Name: Harris.DairxJAC......................................................... County. . • UbAXTU5_._..................._.__......... Owner Name:C=iS-------------_-_-- I?airy_IuC.._._._._._._------------- Phone No: 794:455=.4It-------------------------___-- Mailing Address: a.643,X.eMbrualj.RQmd........................................................................ Har.ris)"aurg.Ac .............................................. 7.80,75 .............. FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No:...................................... Onsite Representative: �i21K�ARRLS-------------------------------------- Integrator:------------------------------_�------- Certified Operator:JfD0L..................................... Hairris................................................ Operator Certification Number:2159.4...-........... Location of Farm: ram the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2 'le. Farm is on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 17 42 Longitude 80 • 36 QS Design Current '7]esign -Cur_:rent Design _Cnrrent Swine 'Ca aci Po elation Poultry -,Capacity Po elation Cattle Ca aci ':Po ttlation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars ❑Layer ®Dairy 200 125 ❑ Non -Layer ~� ❑ Non -Dairy I I' ❑ Other Total Design Capacity ' 200 Totallssl ;w 280,000 Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IS No 'Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G Identifier: ......--..Side. .......... ...........ICaC.......-........................... ............................. Freeboard (inches): 48 48 VJJ UJ/ V/ Facility Number: 13-7 Date of Inspection F 9/5/2002 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Annlication I.VIY�!lYGif ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type Alfalfa Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes IN No 16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) - ❑ Yes ® No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ®No 23..Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ®No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes #19) RECORD KEEPING NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED IN ALL AREAS. (FREEBOARD LEVEL, WASTE APPLICATIONS) THE PUMP MARKER IN THE SIDE WASTE STORAGE PONDS NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED. THE MARKER SHOULD BE THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT THE ANIMALS ARE KEPT ON THE LOT NEEDS TO BE REVISED IN THE WASTE ANAGEMENT PLAN. THE PLAN INDICATES 18 HOURS/DAY. MR. HARRIS STATES THAT THE ANIMALS ARE ON THE )T APPROXIMATELY 7 HOURSMAY. ISSUED. Reviewer/Inspector Name N Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: , "�� 05103101 Condnaed Facility Number: 13-7 Date of Inspection 9/5/2002 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®'No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perrnanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No ALI F WATE `O�� 9pG Michael F, Easley Governor William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary > y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 0 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director co Division of Water Quality WATER QUALITY SECTION January 9, 2002 Harris Dairy 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, Nc 28075 Subject: Operation Review/Compliance Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7 Cabarrus County, NC Dear Mr. Harris: The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this, there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder. the following information is a partial list of what is required: • A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review. The certified faun plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit. • Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September. • Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample. • Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s) performing the review. • Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion. • A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ. • The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the lagoon/storage pond embankments. The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at (704) 663-1699. M _ t8 Customer Service 1 800 623-7748 Sincerely, Alan D. Johnson/' Environmental -Specialist II Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE (704) 663-1699 FAX (704) 663-6040 o�oF W A rF9 pG t7 � CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Harris Bros. Dairy Joe Harris 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, NC 28075 Dear Mr. Harris: l.� Michael F. Easley Governor William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources WATER QUALITY SECTION March 23, 2001 Subject: Notice of Violation/ Recommendation For Enforcement Inadequate Records/Files Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007 Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection Cabarrus County, NC Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 16, 2001. Based upon the inspection of the facility and a review of your files, this letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) with a Recommendation for Enforcement for the following violations: • Failure to keep a record of the weekly freeboard levels of the waste storage ponds. • Failure to provide information regarding the annual soil analyses for the year 2000. + Failure to conduct a waste analysis of the waste applied during the fall of 2000. •. Failure to post the Emergency Action Plan and have in the file a copy of the required checklists (insect control, mortality, and odor control). • Failure to amend the waste utilization plan to indicate the crops and fields currently being utilized for waste application. • Failure to maintain adequate freeboard in the side waste storage pond. • Failure to remove vegetation and trees from the embankment of the rear waste storage pond. Failure to follow the requirements of the certified farm plan and to provide complete records during an inspection is a violation of your Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007 and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10C. If you have an explanation for the noted violations that you wish to present, please respond in writing within ten (10) days following the receipt of this notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration. Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson. It is requested that your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as the facility number. l�.b�ENWR tomer Service :00 623-7748 Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE (704) 663-1699 FAX (704) 663-6040 Page 2 Harris Bros. Be advised that North Carolina General Statues provide for penalties of up to $25,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. By copy of this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local District Soil and Water Conservation Service, DWQ is referring this facility for technical assistance, if appropriate. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, Rex Gleaso /,P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Cabarrus County SWCD Compliance/Enforcement Unit Regional Coordinator File I _ F .. . 4rid.•`ti;.— yea!,. .; _'r•, ._ _ _ �•+� ''� � � '� ,« _ i sion`iif �9ater.`Quality �;.,="•y: - _ � �- ��`t-. Division of Soil "d Water C;onservation 4'}Rr�kc F . t ` S{� '� 4 �fw i • 1� )74*t" J T a;�Fh a ► .Sri .. f Nit _� i : s�r y i'r� - r ? O Ot►lerAgencya--•:;{! :at . .,�il!::..r...:. r: S+ + r 3...lfiRiC` e. ' r Nf a c• yl _ !e ,.,'�'•„'--t,�. �.. �'47i' }'11:. .:° rt _y.Y h•r�?.�'�.� ':v"E:s T..l� „yw :, .t..r.f .1..;. J � >�;��+: i• �.,,�. k... Type of Visit -1P Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit �& Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Facilit),Number Date urvisit: [f�(vf Time: T �G'C� Q Not 0 eratiotial 0 Rclon' Threshold ❑ Permitted ❑ Certified © ConditionalIy Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold. ............... Farm Name .! County:.. . ................................. OwnerName: .................1T s:f u L,...............h...z.................................................. Phone Vo:....................................................................................... Facility Contact: .Title: PhoneNo: .... ............................................... Mailin Address: �fGG . � 7C�Gaw.... ,....I��C .................... � g `1:.. cz.k. � x-� : �....� k r-�J....... ............I........ 2....... `..:.ZS` Onsite representative ..................r.:..............�..c:. Iriiegra[or: Certified Operator: .............._}.Q. ................................... Operator Certification Number: ........ Location of Farm: Y [I Swine [I Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude• Longitude • �u Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population [] Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I IDairy o p ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity ❑ Gilts ❑ 13oars Total SSL W Number of Lagoons JCI Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps E::= ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges & Stream Impact 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo Discharge originated ar. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min:' d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [�kNo 3'. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No 01/01/01 rnrrlinrun.i Date of Inspection Facility Number: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway lkycs ,.,. No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Ident'stier: ......i.fC�.e ........ ;recrr........................................................................................................................... Freeboard(inches): �.Z...1t_ ...... .1..............4...............................................................................---_........... . ............................. 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion. ❑ Yes No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? Cl Yes [�Aio (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? [rIyes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? , Yes ❑ No Waste ,application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 4 No l l . Is there evidence of over application'? Cl Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ,R No 12, Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWhiP)'? Yes ❑ No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ,a No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ;My No 17,dkfe rock outcrops present? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.8. s there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No On -site ❑Off -site Required Records & Documents 19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? Cl Yes [ FNo 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Yes ❑ No 21, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) , Yes ❑ No 22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No 23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [&No 24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes J"o 25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes RNo 26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ,&No 27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 6 No Odor Issues 28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes RNo 01 /01 /01 • Continued r� � Facility Number: - Date of Inspection 30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 34. Igo the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover? Printed on: 1/I7/200I ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes b vo ❑ Yes Q No ❑ Yes ❑ No jU No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Com>Qierits:(Tefer to questiop #):=Exp ain any, -YES answeis'an or any. recommendations o� ariy;other. connrnents:'.:= r w'" l ge'drawtngs of facilityto better explain situations {use additional pages as necessary} Field Copy ❑ Final Notes ' `1 led /2) Gl/'Gi r e; u ij e- r CU 4 S ter A, LO e,5te-- L.Ucc- 5 4j e c cti �-�4,1 �r,-r- I VX �c . 4— jU v C�Aci i Y S e. 5 0C� ti Lip l I l`C'A�n 1--Cl l �}2c cv4�'rc.1 v � fL c�c._r tf'_<5£� r �)VA ac— �� �� � �'Lcl•��.- car` �t l� `�'�� �vLt e'r� e i7c c Reviewer/Inspector Nance L- Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 d 01/01/01 Facility Number --- Lagoon Number Lagoon identifier 0 Active 0 Inactive Latitude Longitude. By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number: 35. Surface Area (acres): 36. Embankment Height (feet): 37. Distance to Stream: 38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon? ❑ On -site ❑ Off -site 39. Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 40. Overtopping from Outside Waters? 41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards? 42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent NRCS Standards? O less than 3o0 ft 0 30o ft - 1000 ft 0 greater than 1000 ft O Yes 0 No 0<5 05-10 0>10 O Yes 0 No O Unknown O Yes 0 No O Unknown O Yes O No O Unknown 43. Was groundwater encountered during construction? 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown 44. Depth to Groundwater: 0 Unknown 45. Spillway? 0 Yes O No 46. Adequate Marker? • 0 Yes O No 47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure? O Yes 0 No 48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): j' � MR ' JAMES S. HUNT GOVERNOR _:: r.• . ' VPAYNE,'NI CD>w V 1TS-"; SECRETARY r,• S^L'�`�1�•- �Y 1 , NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OPFIGE DNISION OF WATER QUALITY November 19, 1998 Harris Dairy 1643 Pernbrook Rd. Harrisburg, Nc'28075 Subject: Site Inspection Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7 -Cabarrus County, NC Dear Mr. Harris: Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service. Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general permit. Waste applications Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronoinic principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required (e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that the previous crop has been removed from the field. DID NORTH MAIN STR$ET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2611E PHONE 704-663-166D FAX 704-663-6040 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER ). Page 2 Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance. General Recommendations for Nitrogm_M Applac_ation for Common QLgps: • Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early March. • Corn/Sorgbum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting. For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder when the corn is 18 inches high. • Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one- half (1/2) in mid -August to September. • Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 401bs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 601bs N/ac in April and the remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each cutting. Finally, there have been instances where, the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the facility, or the amount of rainfall. Soil_ anaivgis (FREE) Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4 inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems. Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to maximize crop production. Page 3 Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample) The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent sample results. Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond, approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is nol going to be shipped the same day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers. For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon storage pond prior to application, it is strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date. For farmers who.apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season. If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P. E. �1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Cabarrus SWCD Non -Discharge Compliance Unit Regional Coordinator No. State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Mooresville Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor William E. Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Joe Harris Harris Dairy Inc. 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, NC 28075 Dear Mr. Harris: AM .NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES WATER QUALITY SECTION November 3, 2000 Subject: Notice of Deficiency Animal Operation Inspection Harris Dairy Inc. Certificate of Coverage # 130007 Cabarrus County, NC Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 31, 2000. Based on his observations during the inspection this letter is being issued as Notice of Deficiency for the following: • Trees on the dam embankments. These need to be removed. • Failure to keep a record of the storage ponds' freeboard levels. In addition to the noted deficiencies, you should contact your technical specialist regarding the construction of a permanent diversion at the push -off ramp for the side storage pond. Also, you must be sure that the crops and fields receiving waste are listed in the waste utilization plan. The fields and crops you identify on the waste application forms should be in agreement with those listed in the plan. Be advised that the following must also be available for review by the inspector during the inspection: • Certification forms. • Site diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas. • Three years of data (waste/soil analyses, waste application records). • Emergency action plan, which must be posted. • Insect, odor control, and mortality checklists must be completed. a 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone 704-663-1699 FAX 704-663-604 An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper Page 2 Harris If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, iYi . f.�rl•t, . � C..^�--- D. Rex. Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: File Division of Water Quality Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation Q Other Agency Type of Visit Alcompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit R'Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access ' Cd n: 7/21/2000 ' t)atc uP �� isit: (�' '"5 'r , ; Firuc: Pri�led u Facility Number i 0 Nut O erational Q Below Threshold 13 Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Uate Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................... Farm Name: 5 lJl..(.r. County:. Catr'rl?t................................... A OwnerName: ...................:I Tc.:. ...........................L.!� ........ .12 .................. I hone Na: ............l,l .....'. T ............................, "{" Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:................................. Phone No: .................:............. ,Mailing Address:..1��..�1F-3..........�t..:L`?PC ......................yl lll. �:.( �t ll/............. ........ . OnsiteRepresentative:....:. .c ................................................................ Intel;rator:...................................................................................... Certified Operator: .. Operator Certification Number:f! Location of Farm: ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �+ �•� Longitude �• ��« Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity PopulationCattle Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder (❑ Laver ® Dairy / ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Total SSLW Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagmin Area 10 Spray hietd Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Diseharees S Stream Im act5 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo Discharge originated au ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If dischari c is observed, ryas the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the -State'! (if yes, notify DWQ) c. II'dischargc is ubscrvcd. what is the estimalcd flow in gal/ruin'? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes B.No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters ofthe State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 91No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? E] Spillway Struc:turc I Structure 2 Structure Structure 4 Identifier: Freeboard (inches): 5/00 ffl�yes J�No Structure 5 Structure 6 Continued on back �Facility Number: /Z _ Date u1' lnr-pectiun !Tinted On: 7/21/2000 5.• Are there an)' i�m-+m�-ediate threats to the integrily of any of the structures observed'? Oe/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes RNo seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? . ❑ Yes 16 No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes allo 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes J4 No Waste application 10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R�No 1 1. is there evidence of over appii::ation! ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Yes SNo 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Regards & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists. design. maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? fiel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility'require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? C7; K6'**iolaiigris o' t, &nc�, ien, Ne* -v;t=ere itafed- ditfi ig #his'visit: • Yott Will •reed,06 Rio; further - ; .. • r rresD6Tidence. aboutthis visit • . • .-• . ' ................. ' .......... ' .... . IF- +WNo ❑ Yes ❑ No 9Yes ❑ No ,'Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes gj No ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes Qg,�Jo Yes ❑ No ,Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes B :No ❑ Yes ;EP-No ❑ Yes ) No ❑ Yes ►!TNo ❑ Yes E�Xo ❑ Yes trNo Comments (refer to question #E): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations -or any other comments. Use drawings of facHity to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): a�' � P�r� n e.v�� b tir+r��r 1 �t►JrXS ► o►� 5 �oa�`c�, ��. es�tis� �e �. s � d>✓ pis k �� ,�-a.,,,,,,, . trA, *r Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector signature: /V Date: 5100 Facility Number: — Date of inspection �_� Printed on: 7/21/2000 Wor Is5ue5 6. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [RNo 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 4No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.) ❑ Yes No 31. Do _the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes RNo 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No Additional Comments and/or Drawings: a` � r t� � ' h C � ��v 1 V+� �l W � � �� 5100 State of North Carolina 'T Department of Environment N. . 4 • and Natural Resources XNM� N O MEN" HEALTY� �i► Division of Water Quality;1A - Riso RCES JAN 24 2000 ._James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor �_ Bill Holman, Secretary wrlsloR OF 6�YIRi2N1KfNTA1 MANA6EY Kerr T. Stevens, Director aNpRES'" "IN Al B 41 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF Fes{ ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL_ RESOURCES January 19, 2000 HARRIS DAIRY INC. 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD HARRISBURG NC 28075 Subject: Application No. AWC130007 Additional Information Request Harris Dairy Inc. Animal Waste Operation Cabarrus County Dear Joe B. Harris: The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by February 18, 2000: I. Please provide waste storage pond capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.) for the two ponds at your facility. Be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable. 2. The irrigation parameters listed in your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) exceed current recommendations. Irrigation events are to be listed in the WUP as the maximum application allowable for that soil type from the time the pumps are turned on until the time they are shut off. The application events listed in your WUP appear to be out of the Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this guide have not been adjusted for the application of animal waste. It is currently recommended that total application amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any soil type. If your application rates need to be adjusted for the application of animal waste, please have your Technical Specialist revise your WUP to reflect the appropriate application amount per event. If the rates exceed the recommended one inch, please have your Technical Specialist justify the increased application rate in the narrative of your WUP. 3. Please provide the Operation and Maintenance Plans for this facility. 4. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented at this facility should be identified (check the appropriate BMPs) on the Insect Control Checklist, on the Odor Control Checklist and on the Mortality Management Checklist. 5. Please provide the Emergency Action Plan for this facility. 6. The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) submitted is for 160 head of dairy cows. The certification for your facility is for 200 cows. Written in on your WUP is 200 but the WUP is still only for 160. Currently, the permit can only be written for 160. Please indicate in your response to the above items what number you would like to be permitted for. If it is more than 160, you will need to contact your technical specialist and have your WUP revised to reflect the correct number of animals. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Application No. 13-0007 Joe B. Harris Page 2 Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, .-sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention a4the address below.. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before February 18; 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to,be operating without a permit. Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at (919) 733-5083, extension 364. Sincerely, Dianne Thomas Soil Scientist Non -Discharge Permitting Unit cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Permit File Cabarrus SWCD State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Harris Dairy Inc. Harris Dairy Inc. 1643 Pembrook Road Harrisburg NC 28075 Dear -Harris Dairy Inc.: e�� ANCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENViRONMEN7`AND NATURAL�UFES December 30, 1999 q r1Art3t{wL >;�soUxc�ae FJAN 10 M0 ���I4�Hf.�Ili1�yAI1'�itAl 9Fft� tMHtt Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping Animal Waste Management System Facility Number 13-7 Cabarrus County This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for PIant Available Nitrogen (PAN) application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers. Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2, SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an appropriate enforcement action. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting requirement. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the DWQ staff at (919) 733-5083 ext. 571. Sincere / /' Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality cc: Mooresville Regional Office Cabamas County Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Al7irmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper Stag of North Carolina Department -of Environment and Natural Resources Mooresville Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr_, .Governor William E. Holman, .Secretary Harris Dairy 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, Nc 28075 Dear Mr. Harris: NC*DENR 'NORTH C+r.OUNA DEF06RT► ENT OR -ENviRowmewT AND Nal]RAL RESouRGES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY October 1, 1999 Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site Inspection Report Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7 Cabarrus County, NC Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 21, 1999. A copy of your plan should always be available for review during an inspection. Also, three years of records must be on hand for review during an inspection. Please note that during many of Mr. Johns_on's inspections he has noted that some farms.are often missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection: • Certification forms. Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas. • Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses. • Maps of acreage and irrigated fields. • Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number , usabletwettable acres (not necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste produced by livestock. • Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data. It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder. • Emergency Action Plan which must be posted. • Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed. • Certified Operator renewal card. Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications should be made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, P m1 G-cj, D. Rex Gleason, P. E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: File 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone 704-663-1699 FAX 704-663 6040 An Equal -Opportunity Affmnative Action Employes 50% recycleWll)%.post-consumer;paper • - 13 Division of Soil and Water: Conseiryatio[i .',Opeiratior Review „..: Division of Soil and,Water,Conservation.- Co'rnpliance;inspection t Division of Water Quality = Compliance Inspection 0 Other Agency - Operation Review Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other Facility Number late of lnspection Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm) Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Ig Not O erational 1 Date Last Operated: � TT.�/./.a_ ... I Farm Name: ...... 1.f6 ....................�r.lf`....1 `� C-......... ... ....................... County:........ r.. Felt .f�.................................. Owner Name ,( -� Phone No: yS 5�— Z*-) Iq .r/I..S............. �..t.r.4...........rX�............................................................... .. ?... ,Z...`I l Facility Contact: .............................................. :............................... Title• Phone No Mailing Address:........ G..��3........... G-e!.',i..-krD.� ......... ................ ......1f f��.l.�... u.r,.. ............................... ...�%.7~ Onsite Representative: ................. Aae ...................... l.i`i.5................. Integrator:.................................................... ............................................. e tied Operator:. ,�•,`�� .... Operator Certification Number:..,�j.,!5 ,,,,,,,•„... r...t. �............................tion of Farm: ...... ... ..... ................ .. .... atitude Longitude 0 Design Current " . `. Design Current Design Current ,PSwine. ation attle' Capacity Population.' ❑ Wean to Feeder El Layer ❑ Dairy Z 3 ❑ Feeder to Finish 1[:] Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 0 Gilts, ❑Boars :.:. Total SSLW " ;Number of Lagoons � . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon ID Spray liield Area Holding -Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ii'yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Struct rc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: •� Z r e,CC tr Freeboard(inches): ..........r..`........................... ..�........................................... ..... ................................... ............................ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity. of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc) ❑ Yes *0 ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes Mo ❑ Yes KNo ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure 6 ............................ [:]Yes %�No Continued on back 3/23/99 Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes U[No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes *0 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes RNo 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes KNo Waste ADnlication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes jjj'No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes KNo 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [:]Yes 05.L40 b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 9Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [9 No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes O'No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes RNo Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 14Yes ❑ No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes ❑ No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes KNo 21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 04No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency,? ❑ Yes No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No yiQla>�it?�1js.o dgfcjeO;�'b4tedi� {�ls v�sXt► You :wii� ><•eeiyea fu>�tor; correso oiideiki abb;6t this visit . r #r�.7rqs�-. eexr uti - <s�t2xn �sr .. .- .W ar p€yRept 9lrw C6imments (refer to q on #) Y ExplaaiWa ES answers an� r3any':`recommendations, or any ,other comments [Use;drawings�offacil>it to better ex la ii:s§i uattons use addtttonal1 a es as.necessa., r, y _. : : P. ___ _ m _.,,v _ ��. __,. ,p S 3')r t r. �� tr,;1, tf : �rv�.3 ✓� F�-tCc� `t'�Q�- `+'�'P �a�'vr� , �G�v\ t,�ccs y��' GL� o�,�b [� � LAO C�_r vs'4',a +'y �m� a a V C" s P r r tn•: e- {�►o- h 1 [� Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3/23/99 Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ELNo liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes RNo 28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RNo roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes AM -No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes KNo 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yos RNo 3/23/99 ,State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECTIPT REQUESTED Harris Dairy Inc. Harris Dairy Inc. 1643 Pembrook Road Harrisburg NC 28075 Farm Number: 13 - 7 Dear Harris Dairy Inc.: f NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsOURGEs April 6, 1999 Uwe, Qr- W4*. t at•w ApA 10 19M, You are hereby notified that Harris Dairy Inc., in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 676 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application. The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Post Office Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at (919)733-5083 extension 364 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at (704) 663-1699. Zcerely, for Kerr T. Stevens cc: Permit File (w/o encl.) Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.) P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper y�Y _ -y-a-416J NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY May 8, 1998 Harris Dairy 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, Nc 28075 Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations . Site Inspection Report Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7 Cabarrus County, NC Dear Mr. Harris: Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May 6, 1998. You should be sure that the number of animals (160) in your waste utilization plan agree with the number (200) stated in your certified plan. Also, the vegetation on your storage pond at the rear of your facility should be cut. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P. E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor Cabarrus SWCD Non -Discharge Compliance Unit Regional Coordinator 919 NORTH MAIN STREE7, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115 PHONE 704-663-1699 FAX 704-663-SOAO AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER ' 'j13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency MDtviston of Water Quality ,, r Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u 'of DWQ ins cction 0 Follow-up of DSWC review• 0 Other Facility Number Date of inspection Time of Inspection i 24 hr. (hh:mm) 0 Registered r.9kertified 13 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 1E3 Not O er:►tional " Date Last Operated: .--:­ r Farm Name: ........ �q.n i-?........�r LLt __.y 4_-t L County:.......CCa,..k+.&.�!rl.�L.................................... Owner Name : / 14sr ............H.CLu'.y- t..5............... �.Y.�.�......�........ L................................ Phone No: ZI'll 7�...................... o r 2 3.. FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... Mailing Address: .............. la 3...... t�e.F►-►...r�, ......�..........rr..t...0 ....................................... Onsite Representative:........... .......... 1.4 L C..rI... I ....................................... integrator:...................................................................................... I Certified Operator,....... ....... .............. Y' l 5................................ Operator Certification Number:.... !. . Location of Farm: ...... .�r...........,...w�...... ..L............r...... ....�.. �...................................�..�.......w.......t.....� ..... j.......t...................-.........�.. . . ... . ... ... ff,, . ........ .�... 45_...... hY..Y►.....f'.,o hv....0L1.................. Latitude �' � L_LJ°� Longitude ®• (0 Design ' .,Current Design Current Swine, Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population . Cattle „ ❑ Wean to Feeder I0 Layer airy ❑ Feeder to Finish JCI Non -Layer I 1 ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish -Total Design Capacity] ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Total SSLW Design Current Capacity Population C)d _v6 a S'01 0G�4 Number of Lagoons / Holding. Ponds,. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area 3'.. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System l., General ❑ Yes 16 No I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ANo 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes NEANo maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes *No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes '�_No 7/25/97 Continued on back Y Faocilitf 'umber: 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures I,a oon. 11oidin Ponds Flush Pits etc. 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ;,f{.,Crt...... Freeboard(tt):............s.........................................,...................................................................................................,.,.. 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of -adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ Yes K No Structure 6 ........................................ ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes P!�N'o Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes >ff No ❑ Yes 'No I—N .................................................... ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes PINo ❑ Yes ZjNo Q No.violationS-or de'fi'cienCie's. Were-noted'durin ' this visit.- Nou4ill receive -no ftirther correspondence about this'. visit'.-'.', Jse nrawingsor.t"st Ub was �. stion*): tiplain arty AS answers and/or utiv recoii meiidattons or any other py to better explain situations."(use additional pages as•neccssa -y.:s s � ;,- 1 rij p 146 ; s K —M 6 tV5 de�e. /,L" far d OO � wa5 L Aot. 4 coai�C� gCc,o`&`7/ r as1 t,ea.✓ .f C�f�c� �.o yea r uI; lrja�z'or p/ate r s '}&e 4e c_� . sPe _1',,1 s ❑ Yes qM f-141 No ❑ Yes `�No ❑ Yes �JJNO ❑ Yes K] No ❑ Yes `4 No ❑ Yes 'INo ❑ Yes Wo -r,m- f 13 OAJ t~ _5 7/25/97 Reviewer/Inspector Name "~ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: State of North Carolina Department of Environment, • Health and Natural Resources James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Steve W, Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996 Harris Dairy Inc. Harris Dairy Inc. 1643 Pembrook Road Harrisburg NC 28075 Dear Mr. Dairy Inc.: 1DEHNFZ N.C. DEP'r. op ENVIRONMENT, ItFAI,'rIX & NATURAL Rl WC1tJ,tCt S Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DEC 17 1996 Facility: Harris Dairy Inc. Facility ID #: 13-7 DIVISION OF ENVIR011H NTliI IIANAGELIENT Cabarms County NOLIRESKU RERIONAE OFFICE Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements for designating an OIC. A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners'and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of 1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste. As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate ari Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and returned by December 31, 1996. If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919n33-0026. Sincerely, FOR Steve W. Tedder Enclosures cc: Mooresville Regional Office Water Quality Files Water Pollution Control System P6. Voice'919-733-0026 FAX 919-733-1338 Operators Certification Commission An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • Mooresvilie'Regional Office 0 James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ... t, Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary IDEEHNF;Z DMSION OF WATER QUALITY MARCH 19, 1997 Joe Hams 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, NC 28075 Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site Inspection Report Harris Farm, Facility #: 13-7 Cabamis County, NC Dear Mr. Hams: Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on March 7, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible. The runoff from the back lot needs to be collected in some manner rather than diverted down the side of your application field. Please bring this to the attention of the Natural Resources Conservation Service specialist who is working with you on developing your farm plan for the certification process. Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also, please be advised that North, Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental laws and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, D. Rex Gle on, P. E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor Enclosure cc: Cabamis SWCD Facility Assessment Unit Regional Coordinator AJ T. , 919 North Main Street, I *C FAX 704-663-6040 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper x t DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review ` p fi DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection toutine 0 Cam laint 0 Follow-ue of DWQ ins ection G Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other Facility Number Farm Status: __ Qec� r 3..Tic�.„ . ..... _._...„ _ ....._...... Date of Inspection Time of Inspection I f = `f 5' I Use 24 hr. time Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview or Inspection (includes travel, and processing) FarmName: _ . L.C...S� .„ _..„_ ....._..... _ »..»...„r .... County:.--..C.�L.S.._.„......_..».......».»...._.. Owner Name:._ »� ._ ..14—)./!` ....._ „... ..__ _... _.... Phone No . 5'��..�.. � ........... _ ._......._.. Mailing OnsiteRepresentative: _ » .v �rk .„ ..... _ ..........„»...„ ..... Integrator: ........... . . ..... . ...... ....__.....„„...._„ Certified Operator: _.. _ ...a ... _..... fL�.�...._.._._. „._.„ » „._ Operator Certification Number: _ .... .......... ........ ._...... „ ... Location of Farm: Latitude 0 6 ram" Longitude �• �� �« Kpdc-1 ta'd Cl Not Operational Date Last Operated:..»„„.�,.`�`re...� .._.........._.„_ ...._ ...„._.„_ ......._.......„.........__.... of Vperation anti rbwme Number.:; ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish -: �YPoultry ; Number ,t ° ` •Cattle, ❑ La er ,: Da' ❑ Non -Traver Beef ❑ Other Type of Livestock ; F f ❑ Subsurface Drains Present xh Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds � � �. Y- r A �� g ` r` < , ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area !Cieneral 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ENo 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®.Yes ❑ No a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes (9 No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No 4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ERNo 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No maintenance/improvement? Continued on back 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (Laeoons and/or lioldinrt Pands) 9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? Freeboard (h): La 02 1 M La on 2 r� Lagoon 3 ff .... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? Waste Annlication Allk 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (1f in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type .r G,15 kL !? Gt.r. ..... Cow .... ..... _ ..._ ....__..... .....__.._._r ....» .... 16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the cover crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? For Certified Facilities Only A/l 20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? 23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes 25.1No ❑Yes .E.No ❑ Yes 5ZNo ❑ Yes [RNo Lagoon 4 ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes 19No ,Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes R°o ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments" Use dmivings-of facility;to bette'r.explain'situations. {use additional,pages `nte�_e. is b)as�e, ;n� d4 Az- .e_ pczjP_ . aw-Loc�_, b,_� irtt-a (0,300n. r { l �l e Y e 15 1' kn a vyx Tln� (a Q L IG `LST W to �' G Nt Q e 5 I Yee C OI1 ECr�� ILL SDvVt@ WLC�hv���. ` 1C S"r-Y0. `2v.��y d1►� IS h���ng Cl�\1f' ��1 b�f (� 1 s to C� 0, U ca _I olk i Clc� Iv`\-0 A OOCI @Jtll C1`�r�o� , Reriewer/lospector Name Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date: yr "443ion of n arer Quahr)-, water Quatiry aection, t acimy Assessment Unit 11 /14/96 Site Requires Immediate Attention: Facility No.)?) - DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE:, 1995 Time: 1 I : 00 Farm Name/Owns Mailing Address: County: CA,b0.-yiAAp, Integrator Phone: On Site Representative: Phone: M Physical Address/Location: Type of Operation:Swine—Poultry_Cattle Design Capacity:JbDNumber of Animals on Site:, u Latitude: 0 Longitude: a Elevation: Feet 3 5 19 Z $a 36 Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have suffi ' nt freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 4 hour storm event ar NO i 0 In �i,Qs ( Lar�tr (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) �e or o Actual Freeboazd:� t�Inches (5�►,al rev Was any seepage observed from the Iagoon(s)? 70-$0 C% nQA t— Is adequate land available for spray? 5e or No Crop(s) being utilized: Yes or&i Was any erosion observed? Yes oi�i Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings, Ye or No 100 Feet from Wells? G or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or® Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o NzDoo Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes � � J •� i l�iJ\1.� ' � • . �.h.t� �..I Inspector Name 4m Signature ► �e�,� cc: Facility Assessment Unit State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources • Mooresville Regional Office • 0 James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDEHNF;Z Wayne McDevitt, Secretary DMSION OF WATER QUALITY September 15, 1997 Harris Dairy 1643 Fembrook Rd. Harrisburg, Nc 28075 Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations Harris Dairy Inc., Facility #: 13-7 Cabarrus County, NC Dear Mr. Harris: The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997, and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection. As a certified, or soon to be certified, faun your files at a minimum must contain the following information, and need to be available for review during the inspection: Certification forms Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones Waste application records/forms Maps of acreage and irrigated fields Waste utilization plan Waste and soil analysis records Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/ hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified. For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9 inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified. 919 North Main 5trest N%OCAn FAX 704-663-6040 Mooresville, North Caroline 28115 Eciucl Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Voice 7C4-663-1699 50%. recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper Page 2 The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may be issued for the following instances, among others: a) inadequate freeboard, b) inadequate land for waste application, c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage, d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility, e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or f) other minor deficiencies. Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the application records not being filled out properly. Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. cc: Cabarrus SWCD Facility Assessment Unit Regional Coordinator AJ Sincerely, D.�eX'C o Water Quali egional Supervisor �0F WArF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross. Jr -Secretary > -1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources _ Alan W. VJimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality WATER QUALITY SECTION July 27, 2003 Mr. Joe Harris Harris Bros. Dairy 1643 Pembrook Rd. Harrisburg, NC 28075 Subject: Harris Bros. Dairy, Site Inspection Certificate of Coverage AWC 130007 Cabarrus County, NC Dear Mr. Harris: Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 23, 2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be adequately operated and maintained. It was also noted that improvement in record keeping had been made from the previous year. However, the following deficiencies need to be addressed • The storage pond embankments require general maintenance (mowing, etc.). • On the waste application form the operator and facility information must be included. • A copy of your permit and certification form must be available during the inspections. A copy of the inspection report is enclosed. If you have any questions concerning the report,.please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, �)' F�-C- Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: File ,:,DEN Mooresville Regional ice. 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE (704) 663-1699 Customer Service FAX (704) 663-6040 1 800 623-7748 ati �+++[+:,ry�`'�r^h'�;3`"W'�'a�'k✓�}w'� Divisiaa b[WaterQtsaltty .- .��.�.;�, a��_ �a y�'` `�'�.v �' �f�•� �s �s-f�W"�F, "CPF�Jrkti �y..JJ�+,.;iq^�•�7" •-.rr.•_. - �-;:.. ^' -�"" --• L 7 -.� n - y�h�+�5�;�,5 t,ar ^���Sr� .{h7 -T. ,� +�, �,..r; R � ,�:. � �,, �, � a,; Q Division o[ Soil and Water Conservation+� �. - � ���,.��� � � �.� s• c� i �� "�` �,>-'�^s:-��.'� 3 Y fit' r '� � Other•Agetney : ,..:..__. '; .: •, _ :". � -.t: ,a-I"v' ��. � �t� �wr� . ...�--.....t:�'Lt..zw.�.'!S�c�cz"�7'*�..�-�'��� ��•: ., ... _ w _ .�:>•r . ..r .� '.r: - :,. ,a�.,Y.�r : �-t ��:?-�`fi£�.t..sr<.�.Y'��. ��`4-t<W..::. (Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date o1' Visit: b7/23/2t3t13 Tinte: E Facility Number 13 07 NNol O leradonal Q Below Threshold ® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........... _. Farm Name: HarriS.Airy.J.III........................... ............................. County: CAbAXr-us................................ 11MQ........ Owner Name: Aat;ii�I2ail)_Iit>:,._.----------------_-__-- Phone No: (Mailing Address: 1041ftimbr.ulp.RoAd........................................................................ Harrisbure.AC .................................................... IOU .............. FacilityContact:...........................................................`Titie:............................................... Phone No: ...................................... Onsite Representative: dS2F{$ARRiS-----------------------•-------------- Iniegralor:.----------------------------------------.. Certified Operator: �cD....... ............................... arx�s................................................ Operator Certification Number-21SQ................4 ............. Location of Farm: From the intersection of Rocky River Road (SR 1139) and Pembrooke Road, travel east on Pembroke approximately 1/2 mile. Farm is on the left. General location: about 6 miles south of Concord. ❑ 5wine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F3579 17F 427.. Longitude 80 ' 36 OS Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer 10 Dairy 1 200 1 120 ❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I JE3 Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity_ 200 ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars _•, Total SSLW. 280,000 Number o[Lagoons 2 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Diseharees S Slre:tau Im� )t acts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach N ater of the State'' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed. ►%'hat is the estimated flea• in =al/min'? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DVVQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & 'Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ............ 1............. ............ 2............ -------------•--•--•--•-•............... ............ ........................... ........................... Freeboard (inches): 24 22 AC in 2 An r r..».s..... r vJiv✓ivy a.,urenurr�u .y Facility Number: 13-07 Date of Inspection 07/23/2003 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑Yes ®No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ®No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No \Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No 12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Hay) 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes [:]No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. ,}yr.r..,,y .�ion�r ..:-:.. P.. s. - ..�. .w. si'- .. ..:.. k 4+.. - . ti?w'=ht..7.,K..S. S'i�f:�YjV•�Y.�'� C mme (refernto quest_#) ' Explain,any YES:Sanswersiandl. .ar_any recomme?ndations orany other comme Use drawings of facW�to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) tyk'Field "�} - Copy ElFinal Notes 0 •'fin x� s�Ir ..?ter w t'+t' *r, ', e _:r-air k L �^!irw^-�.ti 5F4i �` Y'1 '�� py .S;�f��l�'f5 t� •r .i. 'Gi. a'4.f � ':'1 NVF r.Y.: h_...-dS . ---THE STORAGE POND EMBANKMENTS REQUIRE GENERL MAINTENANCE. ---DURING AN INSPECTION THE PERMIT AND FARM CERTIFICATION FORM SHOULD ALSO BE AVAILABLE ---ALTHOUGH THERE WAS IMPROVEMENT rN THE WASTE APPLICATION RECORD KEEPING, INFORMATION SUCH AS OPERATOR SIGNATURE, FACILITY NUMBER, ETC. SHOULD ALSO BE COMPLETED. ReviewerlInspector Name Alan Johson Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of EmAIG r AW L%WtqNbN oW s t'JOOk v b VKI mAkFP0VR0W11r ,wA_ LppIl May 1, 2003 Harris Dairy Inc. Harris Dairy. Inc. 1643 Pembrook Road Harrisburg NC 28075 WAY f 9 2003 r , WATER MIA 8��'� Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC130007 Harris Dairy Inc. Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Cabarrus County Dear Harris Dairy Inc.: On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit. In accordance with your application received on March 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harris Dairy Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC130007 which expired on April 30, 2003. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Harris Dairy Inc., located in Cabarrus County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, 'and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization PIan developed. The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with ail applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permttee must submit documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility.' wERNR Non -Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Customer Service Center An Equal Opportunity Action Employer Internet httpJ/h2c.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu Telephone (919) 733-5083 Fax (919)715-6048 Telephone 1-877-823-6748 . 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP miy result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you wish _to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (704) 663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at (919) 733-5083 ext. 502. Sincerely, for Alan W. Klimek, F.E. Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section Cabarrus County Health Department Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File AWC130007 NDPU Files ANIMAL WASTE_ UTILIZATION PLAN Producer: JOE B. HARRIS Location: 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD HARRISBURG, NC 28075 Telephone: 704-455-2349 Type Operation: Existing Dairy Milk Cows Number of Animals: 200 head (Design Capacity) Storage Structure: Waste Storage Structure Application Method: Irrigation and Broadcast The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are needed so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwin SIVEID problems. NA njjAt.r . Nonaso1ome Pemooa ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The established acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by, the Environmental Management Conunission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER 60 DAYS (gallons) 200 hd x 7749 gal/hd/yr x 60 days/ 365 days/yrl8 hrs on lot/24 hrs/day = 191,072 gals/60 days WASTE WATER PER 60 DAYS (gallons) 800 gal/day x 60 days = 48,000 gals / 60 days NORMAL RUNOFF (gallons) (Both Ponds) 0.2 ac x 7.49" = 1.5 ac-in / 12"/ft = 0.13 ac-ft x 43,560 ft'/ac = 5438 ft' 5438 ft x 7.48 gal/ft' = 40,676 gals / 60 days HEAVIEST 2 MONTHS OF RAINFALL (gallons) (Both Ponds) 9.3" Rain — 6.7" Evap = 2.6" / 12"per ft. = 0.22 ft x 12,589 W S.A. = 2770 ft' 2770 ft' x 7.48 gal/ ft= 20,720 gals / 60 days VOLUME OF 25 YEAR / 24 HOUR STORM EVENT (gallons) Runoff Area (Both Ponds) 5.8" x 0.2 ac / 12"per ft. = 0.1 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft3 / ac-ft. = 4211 ft' = 31,497 gals / 60 days Pond Suface Area (Both Ponds) 6.0" x 0.29 ac / 12"per ft. = 0.145 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft / ac-ft. = 6316 ft' = 47,245 gals / 60 days ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TOTAL WASTE STORAGE NEEDED PER 60 DAYS (gallons) 191,072 gals A.W. + 48,000 gals Parlor + 40,676 gals R.O. + 20,720 gals Precip. + 31,497 gals 25.24 R.O. + 47,245 gals 25/24 Pond S.A. = 379,210 gals Pond 1 Pond 2 TOTAL "AS BUILT" STORAGE AVAILABLE (gallons)' 15,000 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 112,200 gallons 37,225 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 278,443 gallons Total = 390,643 gallons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 379,210 gals / 60 days x 365 days / year x 4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal.* = 9458 lbs. N Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. *4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal represents highest level of the three most recent waste analysis. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1. ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER: TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BU. USED TO BU APPLY 309 la IdA PASTURE 4.0 30 12.5 1500 MAR- EnB Fescue JUNE Ch SEPT- DEC 309 lc IdA CORN SIL 17 10 16.4 2788 APR- MeB iJULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 2009 MAY- JULY 309 ld IdA CORN SIL 20 10 17.6 3520 APR- Ch JULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 2156 MAY- JULY 309 2 IdA CORN SIL 17 10 52.3 8891 APR- EnB JULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 6407 MAY- JULY 309 3a IdA CORN SIL 17 10 14.6 2482 APR- EnB JULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 1789 MAY- JULY 309 3b IdA FESCUE 3.5 40 6.6 924 MAR- EnB Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 309 4 EnB PASTURE 3.3 30 25.9 2564 MAR- EnD Fescue JUNE SEPT- DEC 309 12 IdA PASTURE 3.5 30 24.9 2615 MAR- EnB FESCUE DUNE SEPT- DEC 387 1 a CoD MATUA 9.0 45 3.9 1539 MAR- MeD Hay JUKE CoB SEPT- DEC 387 1 b CoB CORN SIL 23 10 12.3 2829 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1937 MAY- JULY ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BU. USED TO BU APPLY 387 4 CoB CORN SIL 23 10 4.0 1495 APR- CoD JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1024 MAY- JULY BA EY 60 1.4 546 SEPT-- NOV FEB- APR 388 1 a Ch ALFALFA 0 15.0 NIA MeD FoB CORN SIL 20 10 3000 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 2363 MAY- JULY 388 1 b MeD FESCUE 4.5 40 3.4 612 MAR- MeB Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 1 c Ch CORN SIL 22 10 5.8 1276 APR- MeD JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 914 MAY- JULY 388_ 2a EoB FESCUE 4.5 40 3.0 540 MAR - Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 2b EoB CORN SIL 22 10 9.0 1980 APR- Ch JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1418 MAY- JULY 388 3 MeD PASTURE 4.5 30 3.6 486 MAR- Ch Fescue JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 4a MeD CORN SIL 22 10 7.9 1738 APR- Ch JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1244 MAY- JULY RYE 6.0 40 1896 SEPT- NOV ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN FEB- APR TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BU. USED TO BU APPLY 388 4b Ch MATUA 9.0 45 4.9 1985 MAR - Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 4c MeD PASTURE 4.5 30 4.2 567 MAR- CoD Fescue .TUNE SEPT- DEC 388 5a CoB MATUA 9.0 45 0.8 324 MAR - Hay DUNE SEPT- DEC 388 5b CoB CORN SIL 23 10 2.7 621 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 425 MAY- JULY BARLEY 45 1.4 170 SEPT- NOV FEB- APR 388 6 CoB MATUA 9.0 45 6.2 2511 MAR- CoD Hay JUNE SEPT_ DEC 388 7 PoF PASTURE 4.0 30 7.2 864 MAR- PcE3 Fescue JUNE Ch SEPT- DEC 388 8 Ch PASTURE 4.5 30 10.5. 1418 MAR - Fescue JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 9 Ch CORN SIL 28 10 7.4 2072 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 55 3.5 1425 MAY- JULY ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BU. USED TO BU APPLY 389 3 CoB CORN SIL 23 10 12.9 2967 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 2032 MAY- JULY BARLEY 45 1.4 813 SEPT- NOV FEB- APR 5599 1 IdB CORN SIL 17 10 32.8 5576 APR- IdA JULY MeB SOYBEAN 32 3.5 3674 MAY- JULY TOTAL: 329.2 1 45314 * Acreage may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals following summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. The following legend explains the crop codes used in table above: Crop RYE (Realistic Yield) unit _ lbs N per yield unit Corn Silage ton/acre 10 lbs/ton Soybeans Barley Pasture (grazed) Pasture (hay) Matua Grass (hay) NITROGEN PRODUCED: NITROGEN USED (AV): bushel/acre 3.5 Ibs/bu bushellacre 1.4 lb/bu ton/acre 30 lbs/ton ton/acre 401bs/ton ton/acre 45 lbs/ton 9,458 LBS 45,314 __LBS ***BALANCE -37,344 LBS *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize,the animal waste N produced. A negative number indicates more N needed than supplied by the waste. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN SEE ATTACHED MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION OF ANIMAL WASTE. NARRATIVE OF OPERATION Your facility has been determined to have a waste holding capacity for 60 days of temporary storage with a maximum of 200 head of cattle. The temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 2 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the application equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in table 1. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. Animal waste disposal will be completed by two methods, irrigation and broadcast application for this dairy operation. The irrigation system is a traveling gun operation and irrigates Tract 388, fields 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and Tract 387, fields 1, and 4. The farm operation has a 3300 gallon Slurry -Tank applicator. The remaining fields listed in table I will receive waste through broadcast applications. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in the table of acres owned by the producer. Failure -to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may make this plan invalid. The irrigation system consist of one traveling gun operating at one time. At no time will the application amount of waste water exceed more than one inch of waste water applied during the application cycle. See table 2 for maximum application rates. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY SLURRY TANK The operator has a 3300 gallon Slurry Tank applicator and will use this to apply animal waste on fields not covered by the traveling gun irrigation system. Effective utilization of maure is not ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a given area. For proper calibration of manure spreader, see attached information sheet. Table 2. Maximum application rates for traveling gun system. Tract Field Acres Inches/ Hr MaxJ Cycle (inches) Max. Amt/ Cycle (ac.-in.) 387 la 9.0 0.30 0.90 8.1 387 lb 12.3 0.30 0.90 11.0 387 4 4.0 0.30 0.90 3.6 388 la 15.0 0.20 0.60 9.0 388 lb 3.4 0.20 0.60 2.0 388 lc 5.8 0.35 0.70 4.0 388 2a 3.0 0.2 0.60 1.8 388 2b 9.0 0.20 0.60 5.4 388 3 3.6 0.35 0.70 2.5 388 4a 7.9 0.35 0.70 '5.5 388 4b 49 0.35 0.70 3.4 388 4c 4.2 0.30 0.90 3.7 388 5a 0.8 0.30 0.90 0.8 388 5b 2.7 0.30 0.90 0.8 388 6 6.2 0.30 0.90 5.5 388 7 7.2 0.20 0.60 4.3 388 8 10.5 0.35 0.70 7.3 388 9 7.4 0.35 0.70 1.6 Total 80.3 ai MANAGEMENT OF WASTE APPLICATION No matter what method is used., waste is to be applied to crops and/or pasture during the growing season when needed for nitrogen benefits or as needed for irrigation water as long as nitrogen limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded. The waste storage pond levels will be pumped down prior to December to allow storage during the winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively growing to take up nutrients. The waste is to be applied to the fields and crops listed in Table 1 within the nitrogen limits listed. Waste will not be applied in such a manner that results in waste runoff or over application of nutrients. Application rates must be based on current waste analysis and applied to actively growing crops. Waste must be analyzed as close to the time of each application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. Additionally, a representative Soil Fertility Analysis shall be conducted annually on each application site receiving animal waste. The ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN results of these test shall be maintained on file for a minimum of three years. Proper records, including maintenance, repair and irrigation (waste application) records, shall also be maintained on site and in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells or within 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the farm operator. Animal waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public rights -of -ways by runoff or drift. The Division of Water Quality Regional Office in Mooresville will be notified at 704-663-1699 as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters. b. Spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting animal waste to the application sites which results in, or may result in, a discharge to surface waters. c. Any deterioration or leak in a storage pond. d. Failure to maintain adequate storage capacity in a storage pond that poses an immediate threat to public health or the environment. e. Overspraying animal waste either in excess of the limits set forth in this plan or where runoff enters waters of the State. f. Any discharge that bypasses a a storage pond. Also, refer to Required Specifications, Irrigation Calibration, and Waste Sampling. (attached) ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Name of Farm: HARRIS DAIRY Faciliv Number: 13-7 Owner/Manner Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: JOE B. HARRIS Signature: Dater 31 r0 d o Name of Manager (If different from owner): Signature: Name of Person Preparing Plan: Date: KEN COUCH Resource Conservation Specialist Cabarrus SWCD Certified By: MATTHEW J. KINANE Affiliation: USDA-NRCS Phone No.: 704-788-2107 Address (Agency): 715 CABARRUS AVENUE WEST CONCORD, NC 28027 Signature: a{- Date: o3 of I a boc, State of North Carolina Department of EnvironmentN: ` • and Natural Resources " - Division of Water Quality I)SEP g 1999 James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 41VINOP - Wayne McDevitt, Secretary gz NCDENR Kerr T. Stevens, Director I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES August 31, 1999 HARRIS DAIRY INC. 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD HARRISBURG NC 28075 Attn: Joe B. Harris Subject: Application No. AWC130007 Additional Information Request Harris Dairy Inc. Animal Waste Operation Cabarrus County Dear Joe B. Harris: The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has received your application for the General Permit for Animal Waste. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by September 30, 1999: Please see the attached page of required items. We will need these in order to issue your permit. Please contact your technical specialist if you need help locating some of these items. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, . sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before September 30, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit. Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request or feel that you may need additional time to gather the information, please call me at (919) 733-5083, extension 364. Sincerely, Dianne Thomas Soil Scientist Non -Discharge Permitting Unit cc: Moo resville-Regional.Office, Water-Quality-O Permit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27626-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality .lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director HARRIS DAIRY INC. ATTN: JOE B. HARRIS 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD HARRISBURG NC 28075 Dear Joe B. Harris: ffl:F;V,A IT 0 0 A&4 2 __ !Ll ��� NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTQIPjVftQRbL RESOURCES JV 41YtyE�PL: �sr September 19, 20001� ®p — �oo� b�pQ �i,�Qq Subject: Certificate of Coverage No: AWC130007 Harris Dairy Inc. Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Cabarrus County In accordance with your application received on June 18, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harris Dairy Inc., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Harris Dairy Inc. Farm, located in Cabarrus County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 200 Dairy cows and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). . The COC shall be effective from the date of is until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Certificate of Coverage AWC130007 , Harris Dairy Inc. / Page 2 This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for infonnation on this process. Unless such a. request is made within 30 days, this COC shall, be final and binding. The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (704) 663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at (919) 733-5083 ext. 546. Sincerely, i 'L-14 err T. Stevens cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) CabarrusCounty Health Department Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File NDPU Files �—�- Animal Waste Management Plan Certification l P!caie '.vice or oritit all intitrm-.a6sn Ulm Joe-i Mot re:fulre a it•:".;Wir_ Exiscin_- or New or Expanded (oiease circle one) {;eneral fnformation: Name of Farm: k�dlSt 2`11 �,uC : „,Facility `o:,r--� Owner (s) Name: Six. Phone `o: ID - -42g7 Tailing address: gnq_� kiC C28,015- Farrn Loc_7rion: County Farm is located in: Latitude and LonUicude: IL Integrator: P?ease attach a cocy of a counLy road ma4 with location iddriciaied. and describe beiow (Be specific: road t names. diraccions. milepost. e.c.): H- (Otj (,<, p lilt fZO[� t�- 42� - - Operation Descriotion: ype o%swine tVo. ofAttirnals Zi Wean to Feeder Z Feeder to Finish D Farrow to Wean .D yarrow to Feeder •D Farrow to Finish D Gilts Z Boars T% f �k�tilnais ripe or Carrie :Vo. gfArtimals �, ..,. M�Dairy _ a� Z Pullets :I Beef 'Viunher of Animals: Ntr .nt..:ha T,' Loop pliarico Ent j 1 { a �re.zotrs:Desi nxCaaacr.. •v: �`?-�-��-��•rlrldiridn'a�.D'esr�n:'Cisrlacrrt::�:�=>�: .`"�..<. �'oral. Desi2mCi�rbacrt�...°�':..��.k •,;>• ... acreage available for application: Required .acreage: 028 .N'umber of Lagoons I Storage Ponds: 2 Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (0) Are subsurface drains present on the farm: ITS or (a (please circle one) I.f YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one) sAaxxxseµrr�i�si�a��k��s�a:�ai�sief a!��a as a��s��n�ia ra �l n�xia wa i�f�i�s+,asys4a+aw aL sw a�s�arxia xi,,.ki.. a�wx Mae�si�x a�xr,�a.�ies+s�rs iaia fk r.�ie aria f�ila Hip i�i.. *r Owner I Mana;er areetnent [ (eve) veri[v that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changin_,. I (ire) understand cite operation and mainccnance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named' above and will implement these procedures. i (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capuc:ity of the :waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Manase:nent before the necv animals are stocked. [ (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or froth a storm event less severe than the 25-vear. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. [ (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Consmadon Sar.ice. The approved plan will be tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and water Cunservadon District. [ (we) know chat any modifecadon must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DE`[ or a new certificadon (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a It le transfe.,/.� N'a ne of Land Owner ct� !i /✓ ti �l� Si;nature: v - once: _1.2.-;1.2„ 7 r r':lrrte of ti( s,er(ii ciit e:e tc [corn owndr): ..ra .1J- /7/QY f�,S Sig,nncure: - T AWC -- Nu-u,t t. 1910 t Technica-1 Specialist Certification L AA a WC.'Inical specialist de,ignawd by aw Norfh Carolina Soil and water Cunser:attun Conimissiorl psirsuant ,NC.-\C 6 •0003. I certify that the animal waste management system fur the farm nuvted above has an animal wy management plan that me_u or cxc_eds standards and speciricatiuns of the Division of Environmental `Ianagem (DEM) as specified in i3A NC..\C 3H.0317 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conset:•afion Service (NRCS) antilor tr. North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission, pursuant to lid ,CAC 3H.03t7 and 1=.� NC.�C t5F .0001- .0003. The following elements are included in the plant is applicable. While•each cat* ur: designates a technical specialist . who may sign each certification (SD. SI. WU"P, RC. I). the technical specialis[ should only certify parts for which the.: are technically competent. II. Certification of Design A) Collection. Storace. Treatment System Check the appropriare box ?! Exi ring facility without recroCt (SD or WUP) Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: requirements. ,tora;e capahiliv. c;Insistent .r•itll rr;tSte utilization Z yew, exrnanded or retrotieted facility (SD), -Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds. have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_�,l�l�[2_�LO2 Mfiliadon Date Work Completed: Address Signaturt hone No.:- r704--788 ;d0� ate: -aa'97 --.� B) Land ADpIicatfon Site (WUP) The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization: chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loadine rates. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ RLE-tAap =Aqw(z- Mfiliation D Date Work Corpleted:_ 9- rs-R7 Address (A2enc Lit)eeP L Phone No.: Signature: .Date: /2 ',2-1 � C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots Check the approprrare box Z! Facility without exterior lots (SD ar Wt P or RC) This facility does not contain any exterior loLs. 4 Fsci itv with exterior t (RC) McEhods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): iRCt+42L� --�(-v�— Aiki[iati�n Date Wor -- Comple:ed: /-2-Z2--97 Address (.�Je tr:.!}: COQD PC 28oZ? Phone NO .: `7 -7 - Xes Si,L,nzture: DUEL: / -.2A-97 AWC •- AU ./). Apolir_ation and HandliniE[Iuinment C1teck the uppropr(we ijox Er ,-kr 1'zy of e:+ i a j . r with is q was li' 'nn r t n (1V[.P or i) .animal waste application equipment ,petitied in the plan has been eidher ticld calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessari to accommodate the waste management plant: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to e ;teed either the specitied hydraulic or nutrient Loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been established. required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment 'guidance are C-mained as part of the plan). Z New, vuninded_nr existing facility without existing rice application rQlirm� t for sr+r. irricn[ipn (I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can toyer the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). �%v.: panded. nr existins Facility without existing wtiste :hnnlication egu'pnhent Cor land snreading not t1sir,u s=iv irrigacion (WUF or I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to appiv waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule For timing of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibradun and adjustment. guidance are ,-contained as part of the plan). Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): l �N Affiliation SWCD Date Address ( Signature W'orl; Completed: /.2--Z) q7- he ,\ro.: 7D�-7S8-r�lQ� E) Odor Control. Trisect Control. Mortality'Management and Emerze_ncv :fiction Plan (SD SI. WUP. RC or I) The waste management. plan for this facility includes a Waste' Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency .fiction Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the `fort Iity Management Plan and the Emergency .action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility. 'same of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �411�N �rd`iLO22 Affiliation SWCQ Date Work- Completed: a Address (AgencIO: cm&A OC Phone No.:-10 q - 186 -0,V 05 Si -nature: i24�-9� 4 CD�Wk�Date:_�.� o22 F) Written Notice of New or. Exvandin2.Swine Farm The follo«in.- signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June 21. 1996. If the Facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded I (we) certify that i (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who own property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in compliance wit] the requirements of YCGS 106-305. A copy of the nonce and a list of the property owners notified is attached. Name of Land Owner:,_ Si -nature: Date: dame of'YIana;er cif different from owrer':: �. Signature: Date: ,XWC -- .-u-ust I. 1' 97 III. Certification of Installatiolz A) Collection. Storarte. Treattment Installation �'4t New. exnanded ter ref otitted utility (SI) Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to IaJouns and ponds. have bern installf in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and saecificadons. For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification: is necessary. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Affiliation Date Work Completed: Address (Agency): Phone No.: Signature: Date: B} Land ahylicdtion Site (WLP) Check the appropriate box 3i The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan. :1 Conditional .approval: all required land as speciiied in the plan is cleared for planting. the cropping system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by (momhldayiyear); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan. Z) Also check this box if appropriate if the cropping system as specified in the plan cannot be established on newly cleared land within 30 of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control: Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):�LtN AtaD, __�A_ YLo2 Affiliation U Date Work Completed: a-�2 "47 Address (Agency): T W- ' CAN Q.0 A)C A2 Phone No. '70q-798 o?I0S__ Signature: Date:_ --22 -7 This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B above has been checked. I (we) certifv that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan. and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion conrol. and will submit to DEl[ a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within li calendar dsr3 following the elate specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DE.M. Name of Land Owner: Signature: Name of Manager (ifdifferent tram owner): Date: Si(nature:_ _ _ _ Date: ,kut.-Ust 1. tg,)7 C). Runnf r Controls rrnm Exterior Lots (RC) Facilicv with ctxt2rior lot; NletltudA to n1inlntiZe die run off of pollutants front lswn-iin; and %eavy u,e :,:• ;,; ha:� be_n ;n,;t,1llecl as .,pecitied in the plan. Forfaciluies without extetlor lots. tit) certification is necessary. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):. ��js,t�A{Z© t A, � Lo2 _ Affiliation r3Q({ek(.t5 �WC,D Date ��•or:: Completed: �2 Address (AZency): $� GeiucoR� Q1:ane �o. _ 'r�i0h Signature: Date:_ 42 `a,;?'9 D) anvlication and Handlina E ui rnent installation (WI.:P or I) Check thypropriare block ._1 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the pian is o:: site and read-.- for use: calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part or the plan. J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in dw plan ,gas not been insualled but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment ,specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan. J Conditional approval: :animal waste application and handling equipment specified in [he plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year):- there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):lC Affiliation 0-2R 5 SWCp Date Work Completed:_ /o?? a�2 - 7 Address (Agency): VQQ. Phone - o. Si;nature: The following signature block is only% be used when the box for conditional approval in III D above has been checked. I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subjec: me (us) to an enforcement action from DENT. Name of Land Owner: Signature: Date: Name of :Manager (if different from owner): Signature: Date: E) Odor_ Control. Tnsect Control and_Mortality-�lanatiement (SD. Si. WUP RC or 1) -Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. Tne mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prirt[): Aftiliati.o Address (agency): Siv nature: -SG') C _ Date: /� A C -- Aw4uit 1. 199 y�}Cdp llv J A71 W Vd IygW3� ,tea Art C;r- NI Oa 01W H08H01�7J n )y m 4 �. W313 rA b -13N138 ¢ z Zz ��y o OO y �0o S {3HOti 1 0 3 3: a -a a� fn 4ate/wu +r^� 10 baMH r 7H51fixD�K 3Jatts S08 s •°b KpOaB ��3ssgyav i fn ) ur =IIVV Cn H138 ,= d`� a O rn ONS dl Qey w AN)Oa 7U a y 0 N s��= a'A�Hor � a o 3noa�ll3e a3,x TONI ANVO ' fa to Grp r of a 3 a • -our •OfV1NaOW � 0a x a a' R - �n s rn z oA�8Ah01 j ) �� 3 Id / a o�yo°z t53Afa w o .0 n��Z` 'D�2 a• 3 z �a n3E , co iS'd d� AlL 3 a 0 m' IM3 .i11�1) x %S �l oa µ `°3Sn 1 ��a `+nw b� ao �� ap o� �+ 0b3H3ti4 7 109 n0 o d• � .� •�� � a�B$., \� s 'S:,� y ,,, r °tip J) � .'� � - . � 1. �--� . _.., • . �� d- a� . ��a . r.:-'i ` ' � ` ��°�. p I v .3La"bye xd 109 qp J ' a �N1003N ' •1 � � r 0 Al Dprr N3)0 T" �o"acPo 1N31 /: ��d -I y`0 o OS ,tp�aulN. �w a.1 1-. Q '!' ,,.,• ".i d'rb on ac � � W � _--� � �•.= ! • � � � r- - y 'll3aC'23'hh• `' .y a �• ? cn ,,a��0ao C add 9�1 �L '-�' _� _ r— �. :s �s�,•�': � o�� � � yr p Z ���� dd L�t'1 i�. di\ r./ � d� 00 •x T .0�, y 1 ►i�b H J °; I '' 'Dad i�o� ''��%y c ow. oQ7 ya '► .; Jd�dIN a0dC�ti�' 9v 0 y a .ot`� �o°o a H3no LI 0 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN RECEI V wg�R OUgttn,SE D ON Producer: JOE B. HARRIS Location: 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD HARRISBURG, NC 28075 Telephone: 704-45 5-2349 Type -Operation: Existing Dairy Milk Cows _� Number of Animals: 160.00 head -.-- n00 I� ' d (Design Capacity) Storage Structure: Waste Storage Structure Application Method: I Irrigation IV 2 01999 Non -Discharge permitting The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are needed so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be.grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injection the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose t6 change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The established acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 160.0 head x 7749 gal/head/year x 12 hrs on lot/24 hrs per day = 619,920 gals waste per year 160.0 head x .29 ac inch/head/yr x 12 hrs on lot/24hrs per day = 23.2 acre inches per year AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 23.2 acre inches of waste x 243 Ibs N/acre inch = 5637.61bs N/year Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1. ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER: TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE TON, BU LBS N / TON, BU. ACRES LBS N USEDI> MONTH TO APPLY 387 1 CoB CORN SIL 20 10 16.1 3,220 APR-JULY 387 4 CoB CORN SIL 20 10 6.5 1 300' APR-JULY 387 4 CoB BARLEY 45 1.5 6.5 439 OCT-MAR 388 1 Ch EoB CORN SIL 19 10 24.2 4,598 APR-JULY 388 1 Ch EoB BARLEY 35 1.5 24.2 1,271 OCT-MAR 388 2 Ch CORN SIL 22 10 12 2,640 APR-JULY 388 3 Ch CoD PASTURE 2.8 30 3.6 302 FEB-MAR AUG-OCT 388 4 Ch COB CORN SIL 20 10 17 3,400 APR -DULY 388 4 Ch CoB BARLEY 35 1.5 17 893 OCT-MAR 388 5 CoB CORN SIL 20 10 3.5 700 APR -DULY 388 6 CoB SUDEX 5 45 6.2 1,395 JUNE-SEPT 388 6 CoB BARLEY 45 1.5 6.2 418 OCT-MAR 388 7 Ch PASTURE 3 30 7.2 648 FEB-MAR AUG-OCT 388 8 Ch PASTURE 3 30 10.5 945 FEB-MAR AUG-OCT 388 9 Ch CORN SIL 22 10 7.4 1,628 APR -DULY TOTAL: 168.1 23,797 * Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals following summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. The following legend explains the crop codes used in table above: Crop RYE (Realistic Yield) unit Ibs N per Yield unit Corn Silage ton/acre 10 lbs/ton Barley bushel/acre 1.5 Ib/bu Pasture (grazed) ton/acre 30 lbs/ton Sudex ton/acre 45 lbs/ton ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN NOW9,P NITROGEN PRODUCED: 5,637.6 LBS. NITROGEN USED (AW): 23,797.0 LBS ***BALANCE-18,159.4 LBS *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. A negative number indicates more N needed than supplied by the waste. SEE ATTACHED MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION OF ANIMAL WASTE. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY HIM ON The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in the table of acres owned by the producer. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP APPLICATION RATE * APPLICATION in/hr AMOUNT inches 387 1 & 4 CoB CORN SIL. 0.30 3.25 BARLEY 0.30 2.40 SUDEX 0.30 1.90 388 1-9 CoB CORN SIL 0.30 3.25 CoD BARLEY 0.30 2.40 PASTURE 0.30 1.60 388 1-9 EoB CORN SIL 0.20 1.15 BARLEY 0.20 1.20 388 1-9 Ch CORN SIL 0.35 2.35 BARLEY 0.35 1.90 PASTURE 1 0.35 1 1.60 *This is the maximum application allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed ' for the crop is not over applied. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the application equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in table 1. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. NARRATIVE QF OPERATION The temporary waste storage consist of two waste storage ponds. Waste is to be applied to crops and/or pasture during the growing season when needed for nitrogen benefits or as needed for irrigation water as long as nitrogen limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded. The waste storage pond levels will be pumped down prior to November to allow storage during the winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively growing to take up nutrients. The waste is to be applied to the fields and crops listed in Table 1 within the nitrogen limits fisted. Waste will not be applied in such a manner that results in waste runoff or over application of nutrients. Application rates must be based on current waste analysis and applied to actively growing crops. Waste must be analyzed as close to the time of each application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. Additionally, a representative Soil Fertility Analysis shall be conducted annually on each application site receiving animal waste. The results of these test shall be maintained on file for a minimum of three years. Proper records, including maintenance, repair and irrigation (waste application) records, shall also be maintained on site and in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years. The Division of Water Quality Regional Office in Mooresville will be notified at 704-663-1699 as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters. b. Spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting animal waste to the application sites which results in, or may result in, a discharge to surface waters. c. Any deterioration or leak in a storage pond. d. Failure to maintain adequate storage capacity in a storage pond that poses an immediate threat to public health or the environment. e. Overspraying animal waste either in excess of the limits set forth in this plan or where runoff enters waters of the State. f. Any discharge that bypasses a a storage pond. Also, refer to Required Specifications, Irrigation Calibration, and Waste Sampling. (attached) ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Name of Farm: HARRIS DAIRY Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: JOE B. HARRIS Signature: Name of Manager (If different from owner): Signature: Name of Person Preparing Plan: Date: ,2- a -- ?� Date: RICHARD I. TAYLOR Affiliation: CABARRUS SWCD Phone No.: 704-788-2105 Address (Agency): 745 CABARRUS AVENUE WEST CONCORD, NC 28027 Signature: Date: WASTE UT i : ZAT ION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste sna_ . not r can surface wa v :F : re state b. runoff, drift, manm ace conveyances, direct sop . . _ a , i on , or direct discharge during waaration or land ampli ca.'t1on, Amy discharge of waste which . esc`res surface water jA prohibited. 2. There lust b; documer at_.r in the sastgn folder that the producer l tn:er- owns zr- has an agreamert for .use of aaequ_-lt•-W land on which to wrz a ,c awy the wast . :f the producer does not yawn adoc me land: t- pyacery disp. e of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of an ag', dam_:- _ with n landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him her- the use cT the land for waste application. It is the ; espons is i l i -y cf the owner- of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Flan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of util_lat__n, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be apolied to meet, but not exceed, the nAr-ogen need's for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, un lesss ' There are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other- nutrients. 4. animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be apolied to land that is eroding at 5 or More tens, but less Than 10 tens per acre per year providing: grass filter- strios are installed where runoff leaves the field. !See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip) 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. 6. When animal waste ,is to be applied onacres subjects to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application doe's not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Cart l ina" for guidance. %. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates n; . to eKcaed the soil infiltration rate sw=h that , _rn',Tf does n•_. 'ac'cur Offsite Or •t.:� surface waters and in a method which does not cause tr i t from the siteduring application. No ponding should occur- in orda,- to control odor or flies. a Animal waste sna.11 not w applied cc zatorated s I_ri doring rainfall events, or when tha sor''st a is f'r o en. . ?nimaj oasis shall ce apg:lsd gar, anti4ely growing ;ropy in such a manner" that the crap is nQ t _ yet ec w i V Aa's to to a depth that. wo+_ li inn iL i t growth. The ;v 7 r t; 41 for salt damage from an ims waste should also be consijs=arld. WASTE UT it- I::;',TiON FLAN FEQU_IFED_5FECIFICATION5 spring ,_...ar?te,:1 _ -DM 3-. " s 4J_.*h a nigh �i?'.•7en':..�..L fo, 19 A:-- ,ir-g. ie,;_ 1oaa-;ng rates on these zoils should be held to a minimum and a suitable .linter cove,,- ^rop planted to take up re.eased Waste shall not be app««--'a more than 31:1 day_ pri.,l_ ., p:a,Ii ing '_f 'he _,-L ge= lrea�.:, dorman c.Y 11. any new ,,give zf j el- o:?ct.0ber 1, ' ,4?z shell, comply with tn? T'y11owing: .,e OLIt-fir per-iinetel- of the land area onto wh1ch wr—zta is applied fl--tm .a 1ag',on thhat. i = _. comp-Imen t of a swine ; arm Si -.all be at least 5(:! feet from any residential property boundary and from .any perennial stream or rive,,- (purer than an irrigation ditch or. canal. Arrimal waste other- than swine waste from facilities sited on or after Olctober 1., '_995), shall not be applied closer than ES feet to perennial waters. (See �;t•an'dard 393 - F i l tar Str ips 's . 12. Animal waste shall not be .app;-4a,d closer- than 1k_if.l Tact t,i wells. 13. Animal waste Shall not be applied closer than E0C) feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other- property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surfaCe w•zrters, drainageways, or wet -lands ty a discha-•ge t:ir by over ---spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided they have Ween approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly inton water- courses, acid on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift -From the site. 16. Dames-?'_ .ar.d industrial wasta from washdown f-aci l ities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be d--sch3rged into the animal waste management system. 1?. A protective cover appropriate ve.get•ati..ln will be established on all disturbed areas 4iagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be f?nced . as necessa;-y j r.o protect the vegetation. °•r°e�e}.3 ; --. 1 =_lch as f!-e•es, anl-'«tfi3s and l'ltn r- Wo.��']y species , air • . a:"? l .iT:. kar_ r,_ ;a:-,s.g..� WI^•el-e =,-Iriaidered aOp!-ops - -Ate. l.ag_ on arsa= 71ean'.. ?c_eaa ible Se --ina and "i--i--- C�.% ?5 SroZ -.-Z =e -r3-;, Mr+ q4JON S-Isaw ��''=r _k=—UU--) s UT 1.0 peslds'p as =ItM slIeWTul? peaQ •ELD 's_leaA (g) aAT a _iC•l paute4UTWW aq T!sgS 94SLPM _ia4'4'C TIE- -iC.:� sp_kC'C,a_k uC'T�eMT -UCJe a.IS?M •s_k??aA (2) 6a_14'4 -LC-.L aeuTl-,-':iuTeur aq TTsUS sp-_i0Ma'_( UaT•}V:)tTdde a4sem A-(p f•-'*i1-1LI A .s._eaf. ani_: _kc,; -4da:A as TTe4s sp_kO:)a_k STsAlieue a4sem PUP T70S 'ncr_Tlp'1LT'3w pus uLn:aznpu_ld do-iz wnwT4dc _kLll pagsa-:i'pl? a- 77t•L45 H. •S C-Ac�T aATSs Z);tS gzeojdde sTelaw Sat4q UaUM preSii SO T T>i-LS sma :s do-tz, C-AT I u_k-'•Y TP PUSPS-t0'4TU0UJ SO lleq% STT'Cs a44 UT S,aASj GU!' _LIZ7 '4uewaTa 8UT UTtid_ic3 fcp, — a3ls_i EUS CSC T -'t?Ls ' pcT T dd>< c_lr ."s-aonpLn-td a4sem Q_ka4M S9-;Ts d0-1:� ATTFnuu>r :1seaT 4v pesseq .eq TTP4s T T Lis pus UC T'teZ . T - 41 i = C: sr.SD f_,q UT L 1 TM p<&q eq aq T l?qS c3gSeM ' 22 • spuod aye-iogs e:;St'M _ cLJi-,TCA c•8L*_I0:;s ujnw:`,.SLL'• auL; L'4 pca_iinb$_: aq TT iM-(a.-q-t w 'S_lsj_IP111 aq-4 Lia9M-4SCy SAsT pTmbTT 9J-4 UTlp'4UTlpLLJ -:1prablpUtU3 cp .' IF, LS5 bUTdwl'1A 'SUc-nbe: a45PM TTlp 0 (at M10A bUTdiund) a5lp_10-;,s Axtp todwa4 GL,'-; ;C' s.UC,T ;EI.C+Ta UJ'144t'!q pus do-4 ay4 0'_ c'eT Tom?=_UT aq 1-Pus S_la)j-1Pw eTaTsTA A.I45iH ' T2 •ucnsse's dcr_kC+ aq4 6ui_klnp a-4sem TNwTUs .J., sU071'4 <TTddlr-ie4'4-kMJ. CIu u-aTM quetda_td paTTdde eq Aluo pTnogs t T UCT4dwnsuom ulpkul-,4 sdLi_ka uo pas)-, st a4sem TlpwTuw 1.T 'ULrT'-:.dwi7sUl•s Lreti11"iq qz—=a-::p _kol siC+_ln-.t1'4'4L1 pulp jCs�. k U' Pas'-,cC.• U>r=24stM Ii±wTUd •i_lE .�C• da;>� �-�li�,fr� C - --� CZ,L_ ...,_ U71E-tV ..IIF MF•�_k u r_ T'',s ::'us `t':•f Vic`: `...._II'+. 'E E!, Lel•,c_!C: _.. e = p _ � _i^ 'C^ u:: '"'dsU: a r�•(�-�Ci,rc ' .._c r�T Ft `..'diJI.-i rb;.. ~-- F---`•- -• '-'.-� �"+l. 1lpL: � �'�M •�i c, c: t U IE C, T 1T C+ L7 c E" L' c- n F. J 1 T O' W i7 u1 a:L iz e" L U; 7 E Tf+, _ T LlW, - W c 11-re L. T - r: f • Q T ' UaUla T dLL! T _: r _: L: , 'E. _1. _ _. C -' i.!'_ _ G: c '. 5 c U f. C c U FI & J E' L' T iu _i a - _! i?' li r T U IF SNG I G32I nOMI Agri -Waste Management Siological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION OF LAND APPLICATION RATES ,fames C. Barker* I. SAMPLE COLLECTION A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader a. From loaded spreader. collect about 2 lbs of manure from ' different locations using nonmetallic collectors. ii. From storage a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the' surface crust avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors. B. Liquid,Kanure Slurry L. Under -slotted -floor pit a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into manure to pit floor. b. Seal upper and of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over and of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container. c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at lease l quart. d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container. ii. Exterior storage basin or tank a. "take sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure chopper-ag::acor pu.Mp or propeller ag:tacor. b. Take subsar.•nles from about 5 pit locations. from agitator puxp or frcn spreader and place in a plastic bucket. +► Professor and Extension Specialist. Biological and Ag:iculcural Engineering Department, ;larch Carolina Stace University, Raleigh, NC. 2 - c. Mix and add 3/4 pint cc a nonmetallic sample container. C. Lagoon Liquid L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe to flush tanks in a nonmetallic samp:-s ccnta:ne_. ii. From lagoon a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of 10=15' pole. b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge. c. Brush away floating scum or debris. d. Submerge bottle within V of liquid surface. e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container. D. Broiler or Turkey Litter L. House litter a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g., _ areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of floor surface in each area. b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and the other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface. c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area do:•n to earth floor and place in a plastic bucket. d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket. mix, and add about-2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal. ii. From stockpile a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile. b. Mix. add 2.3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and sea?. t . 2 - e. Mix and Add 3/4 pint Co a nonmetallic sample container. C. Lagoon Liquid L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe to f:Lsh tanks in a nonmetallic sampld container. ii. From lagoon a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on and of 10-15' pole. b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge. c. Brush away floating scum or debris. d. Submerge bottle within 1' of liquid surface. e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container. D. Broiler or Turkey Litter i. House litter a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g., areas around feeders and waterers. and estimate percent of floor surface in each area. b..Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is :around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and -6he `other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface. C. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to earth floor and place in a plastic bucket. d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add about•2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal. U. From stockpile a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile. b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and sea?. . 3 . r II. SAIXPL9 PREPARATION AND TRANSFER A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants, soaps, or treat in any other way. B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly. C. Hand -delivery is Most reliable way or sample transfer. D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape. E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts: I. AAL Eastern Agricultural Lab. Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp. 7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090 Ph: (804)743-9401 Ph: (312)398-OLIO ii. Fisher Scientific Co. 3315 Vinton Road Raleigh, NC 27604 :Ph: (919)876-2351 IV. NASCO 901 Janesville Avenue Fort Atkinson, VI 53538 Ph: (414)563-2446 F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly. C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents. I. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture Agronomic Division Plant/Wasce/Solution► Advisory Section Blue Ridge Road Center P.O. Box 27647 Raleigh, NC 27611 Ph: (919)733-2655 Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell ii. Forward $4 along with the sample. iii. Include the following identification information with sample: a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.) b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders. brooderhouse, grower, number Flocks grown on litter; etc.) c. Wasce type (dairy.lot scraped manure, liquid slurry: swine -pit slurry. lagoon. liquid, sludge: broiler -house liter, stockpile IV. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P. K, Ca, fig. van. S. Fe, Ln, Zn, Cu. B v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, No. Cd, Ni. Pb OE 40 Ir 74 I.- �jil�tL'• f � � � �� �4 � • l i by y .� K R: 'I( r.��l�.r,��t� ���{ ��s',t�yf�`�,�;r��,-.:�..•f.,,..�;I-'�"' ;'�• 7liq.�,lt. ��• i� S ,�1r..1 R � .��, a;"� ,L l:�i - � tir��p �.. ,•���''TR ':.r F �� 1'ar r y � � r- � H�?^'I�y ''7 '.I , .'rY, r - �^d � t ,;' ^ ����YI"v it�� r o� s '. , �,5 "',, 7 1 �' ♦" � \ \ i ,�,+.,`.�..:i, yr• 1M'•. 'i"+ '=•1;J,+..: J.'tS';!`,^,lti',,� :';1' ,;: ;',.i'S. � `:C .,t. . �.sa�v � y S��r:� ? rLsr�'r Sti, �•. r,,,PY'� Jr r+ J�\ 'tom , •l. 4 4t •�+ ref +r,;.' .r` ,fa � r� rrr �.CY..'��:f.•!•1•}1•�Y �� :at .}h � R,.F % °� ` �r, } r „pt �,, { ,r{ t r T }�� 7•.•..7�1+. ,y�:.rr ,,I r.e `i,'� - ,; � d r < t , .,. , j,r , � , I•i, :rs �, ,r. �.'.. �' t.' ,'r, , •>•y:: .ri {i '`l.''i �'. ... ^r � t' ( I f\. r, i Y.. ;. -��'. .SS h." �`r •Cr 1 .'r;••s '� 'r ,� ��� 1n-;t�.}, 4� �' '•'S� �� 'r..l br.':3 - '� ti - ,�� � r r ;;r j !-' �, s �{l ' � �' ^�,•�'. .(. +, ,� +r: .< ,.,r�S , �'S n7 71, r..n r +'.i S \` � i rti � � *,•�� ,-f+��'• •�+..t�.iR �H.. ,l�ih..7.•irir' ''�:y '{j1 - t N :k' �Sw.'� ,•, r + :� _•/7 `�� f: Sj, , '. f R_ C;r fl' •� , J, .l, �y�► -t�' �; ;'�1, � NSF ;�,� � i�.� � + ru � ' .�, }��yf'� :�•,-i,�"F��. h ti,��1� +' 'i. .'r.;• 'Y4 .t cif ,'�:r1 :'�' :S, •'l._ '� }s�s-��u �•x /�, •+'.+�l+t `� .�.. _ + 'e"y p. .'fY ,,'.:� .. '7 y' +�'' �� ,s.w.s,r i�.�r'r 4 }y},,,'fr�,y f�J4 Y.��`7 1-' .� r'i, ; f � q. I +,'\ ti•. 'fit'_ .ids S .i'. ft Tirf ..' �� ✓• , '. l.i(''R: I�.T.,i S � y`, ylf 1 'L� `.1 I_. S " .� r : . « '.�� �•r} .• r•'1L'4 Z i. #' ,'.' , a.7.[Y$ r„}' 3r.. s �', 'I � -�,'yr•h f ray;.,. ..Y,r;�� ^ ,I JC' r� : � •r L" -� � �•..�r, i'~ ��� r7�r� br ,� ti ..�i.} i? + '.,��'x�rr �:. �1 i- +'�-.4�t,' .S ''1.' rl ��.4s{q�+r•r' . 17 .S1 _�'bi-. 1 I�": s , y .�. � f7r..� j .s• �yl. Y. :.�.f1•. r},��`' ��, `4' .� �1.'�, ��I�y.� 3 s, - j ,F 1 7,r r}J (� r y,! r' y q i �Yi ,,�,"r� •V �fr{��� ��� 1 r� '�f•�14f'.,sgr\°' �� � Ji4�f /[yF- d)/S�f'y = �+ � �r :a � � \ ',5.'� � � +F' �' E#"�, t�,, r �F t t-r� _ +� tr fe' 11.,7: 'v �.., r,,i I. :`.I�;=:. ' � � �• J7 �w 'fr�.SY;,}�,,�j''. T•'Fs Y.,+J ``y. ?i I ik"'•T� re +, ,ails' T13t .t )'�♦ie,:} '.i'ri r•�. :.(.+`� �7YYt '�.� ,.1t+w \ ±� �%YY��'} •+ Y'! } � ,.,'! � .1 t�f_r, t.l .• is ,ar`'?•fro•s :.5� '' � ♦ �`r ��/ir ��tl � M « 'h • Fl: ��jrl.i'�.� • t 7.'S:� _~ i , � • s �"J r '� � r . .rL> rq.i�, .' . -+i � r 1�,J+rI +r },y r •. Y `..? i a� c .f4 .i ;1! ' .•: Ji'' •J ••'� 5.• .� � _y , - . o'" %+x r' 'K''•.f. ,J.• :s=tir.: rr�, r f�l 1.:. ! (,,i. � r. v _ - 7 r '>, -+ .,-� • � t '.3 � � ., s \; ' � �, is S ' .�' j 1 3j "'}k? rl . 4 fr i '� b 1 4 i •j,,, .:t4l 1 ( '.r ' Sv'fl," oil'r�- ��:L r s i a' I rr -� ,� c , %+ :err' r .: „_ ! ,!�'q r\,• � ,� r,: jtt J'i"` s `*- I'} - 1 '•f 1 l•, •..+1e � , �1'd+'/ }'�- .r 'iir` + 1r>+ L+,II�.r i'jk •yr� S�'.it� ��,,'f.: .' -+ N,t-i.. I.�'`�.a i.k. 1 �,1 � u! I .� S� r �„�'M�•�1•L' .4. l i .� . t �3 ; ;•r� `•'. •} hrl. '• t -- J i ' '!b: •f�„rS ti' y' j. h I r : s �.�:• r }: d� r'r�: ':��'i 1 'a.� f, .yam, S l- _ ,f�;.��r} 1' {'� ;i 1 \ 7,s , '`+• ,� r y7�r,. :;s s.' �~ryr.' ,si+ / } r . i .,: �t}"-.` F�. +�•I �' • C. ,, s� "y °5^ ,; t ; �' . , I.: i t .t' i +�"il} 1r w��(�l�s ���,y;� ,+ r~_1 � .fit' �` '� .• ..r l �� <.ti =j, ��t. ' � F + + +r .. ';l ,E i - �, h�4! - I � r J� 1 �' . .r�{i>�Q'v� - �- t rr ��r}r+�•k' } i .� �'+.. .� :' 114 + n. i/ w S .+ ray Vy.<7 ter'-lr ,�' �s.• °�`�: ��' ^ .� ice. I ,r ,- '.�_ ./` {z- Olt + �. ,Irr t yc!I �,ts17j�;':I• ( lu'� '.`',t� �+ 1, s' 'i`:' sir '+1 •,�i .r 'S,#,r '�. , 5• Fk{�Tf itJ,t \iH .�';I'.Y+., 7 {'Y - �� a. � ' t r rl + t4 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Producer: JOE B. HARRIS Location: 1643 PEMBROOK ROAD HARRISBURG, NC 28075 Telephone: 704-455-2349 Type Operation: Existing Dairy Milk Cows Number of Animals: 200 head (Design Capacity) Storage Structure: Waste Storage Structure Application Method: Irrigation and Broadcast WAT?E C Ei VED QUALl ySEC7lON MAR 2 8 2000 N0n.Discf4rge Permitting The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are needed so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. 5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The established acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER 60 DAYS (gallons) 200 hd x 7749 gal/hd/yr x 60 days/ 365 days/yr18 hrs on lot/24 hrs/day = 191,072 gals/60 days WASTE WATER PER 60 DAYS (gallons) 800 gal/day x 60 days = 48,000 gals / 60 days NORMAL RUNOFF (gallons) (Both Ponds) 0.2 ac x 7.49" = 1.5 ac-in / 12"/ft = 0.13 ac-ft x 43,560 ft3/ac = 5438 ft' 5438 ft3 x 7.48 gal/ft' = 40,676 gals / 60 days HEAVIEST 2 MONTHS OF RAINFALL (gallons) (Both Ponds) 9.3" Rain — 6.7" Evap = 2.6" / 12"per ft. = 0.22 ft x 12,589 ft2 S.A. = 2770 ft' 2770 ft3 x 7.48 gal/ ft3 = 20,720 gals / 60 days VOLUME OF 25 YEAR / 24 HOUR STORM EVENT (gallons) Runoff Area (Both Ponds) 5.8" x 0.2 ac / 12"per fl. = 0.1 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft' / ac-ft. = 4211 ft3 = 31,497 gals / 60 days Pond Suface Area (Both Ponds) 6.0" x 0.29 ac / 12"per ft. = 0.145 ac-ft. x 43,560 ft3/ ac-ft. = 6316 ft3 = 47,245 gals / 60 days ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TOTAL WASTE STORAGE NEEDED PER 60 DAYS (gallons) 191,072 gals A.W. + 48,000 gals Parlor + 40,676 gals R.O. + 20,720 gals Precip. + 31,497 gals 25.24 R.Q. +47,245 gals 25/24 Pond S.A. = 379,210 gals Pond 1 Pond 2 TOTAL "AS BUILT" STORAGE AVAILABLE (gallons) 15,000 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 112,200 gallons 37,225 ft3 x 7.48 gal / ft3 = 278,443 gallons Total = 390,643 gallons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 379,210 gals / 60 days x 365 days / year x 4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal.* = 9458 lbs. N Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. *4.1 lbs. N / 1000 gal represents highest level of the three most recent waste analysis. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1. ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER: TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BU. USED TO BU APPLY 309 1 a IdA PASTURE 4.0 30 12.5 1500 MAR- EnB Fescue JUNE Ch SEPT- DEC 309 I c IdA CORN SIL 17 10 16.4 2788 APR- MeB JULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 2009 MAY- JULY 309 Id IdA CORN SIL 20 10 I T6 3520 APR- Ch JULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 2156 MAY- JULY 309 2 IdA CORN SIL 17 10 52.3 8891 APR- EnB JULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 6407 MAY- JULY 309 3a IdA CORN SIL 17 10 14.6 2482 APR- EnB JULY SOYBEAN 35 3.5 1789 MAY- JULY 309 3b IdA FESCUE 3.5 40 6.6 924 MAR- EnB Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 309 4 EnB PASTURE 3.3 30 25.9 2564 MAR- EnD Fescue JUNE SEPT- DEC 309 12 IdA PASTURE 3.5 30 24.9 2615 MAR- EnB FESCUE JUNE SEPT- DEC 387 la COD MATUA 9.0 45 3.8 1539 MAR- MeD Hay JUNE COB SEPT- DEC 387 lb COB CORN SIL 23 10 12.3 2829 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1937 MAY- JULY ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BU. USED TO BU APPLY 387 4 CoB CORN SIL 23 10 4.0 1495 APR- CoD JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1024 MAY- JULY BARLEY 60 1.4 546 SEPT- NOV FEB- APR 388 la Ch ALFALFA 0 15.0 NIA MeD EoB CORN SIL 20 10 3000 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 2363 MAY- JULY 388 1 b 'MeD FESCUE 4.5 40 3.4 612 MAR- MeB Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 Ic Ch CORN SIL 22 10 5.8 1276 APR- MeD JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 914 MAY- JULY 388 2a EoB FESCUE 4.5 40 3.0 540 MAR - Hay JUKE SEPT- DEC 388 2b EoB CORN SIL 22 10 9.0 1980 APR- Ch JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1418 MAY- JULY 388 3 MeD PASTURE 4.5 30 3.6 486 MAR- Ch Fescue .TUNE SEPT- DEC 388 4a MeD CORN SIL 22 10 7.9 1738 APR- Ch JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 1244 MAY- JULY RYE 6.0 40 1896 SEPT- NOV ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN FEB- APR TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BIJ. USED TO BU APPLY 388 4b Ch MATUA 9.0 45 4.9 1985 MAR - Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 4c MeD PASTURE 4.5 30 4.2 567 MAR- CoD Fescue JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 5a CoB MATUA 9.0 45 0.8 324 MAR - Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 5b CoB CORN SIL 23 10 2.7 621 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 425 MAY- JULY BARLEY 45 1.4 170 SEPT- NOV FEB- APR 388 6 CoB MATUA 9.0 45 6.2 2511 MAR- CoD Hay JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 7 PoF PASTURE 4.0 30 7.2 864 MAR- PcE3 Fescue JUNE Ch SEPT- DEC 388 8 Ch PASTURE 4.5 30 10.5 1418 MAR - Fescue JUNE SEPT- DEC 388 9 Ch CORN SIL 28 10 7.4 2072 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 55 3.5 1425 MAY- JULY ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TRACT FIELD SOIL CROP RYE LBS N / ACRES LBS N MONTH TON, TON, BU. USED TO BU APPLY 389 3 CoB CORN SIL 23 10 12.9 2967 APR- JULY SOYBEAN 45 3.5 2032 MAY- JULY BARLEY 45 1.4 813 SEPT- NOV FEB- APR 5599 l IdB CORN SIL 17 10 32.8 5576 APR- IdA JULY MeB SOYBEAN 32 3.5 3674 MAY - TOTAL: 329.2 45314 * Acreage may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals following summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. The following legend explains the crop codes used in table above: Crop RYE (Realistic Yield) unit _ lbs N per yield unit Corn Silage ton/acre 10 lbs/ton Soybeans bushel/acre 3.5 1bs/bu Barley bushel/acre 1.4 lb/bu Pasture (grazed) ton/acre 30 lbs/ton Pasture (hay) ton/acre 40 lbs/ton Matua Grass (hay) ton/acre 45 lbs/ton NITROGEN PRODUCED: 9,458 LBS NITROGEN USED (AW): 45,314 LBS ***BALANCE-37,344 LBS *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. A negative number indicates more N needed than supplied by the waste. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN SEE ATTACHED MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION OF ANIMAL WASTE. NARRATIVE OF OPERATION Your facility has been determined to have a waste holding capacity for 60 days of temporary storage with a maximum of 200 head of cattle. The temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 2 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the application equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in table 1. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. Animal waste disposal will be completed by two methods, irrigation and broadcast application for this dairy operation. The irrigation system is a traveling gun operation and irrigates Tract 388, fields 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and Tract 387, fields 1, and 4. The farm operation has a 3300 gallon Slurry Tank applicator. The remaining fields listed in table 1 will receive waste through broadcast applications. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in the table of acres owned by the producer. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may make this plan invalid. The irrigation system consist of one traveling gun operating at one time. At no time will the application amount of waste water exceed more than one inch of waste water applied during the application cycle. See table 2 for maximum application rates. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY SLURRY TANK The operator has a 3300 gallon Slurry Tank applicator and will use this to apply animal waste on fields not covered by the traveling gun irrigation system. Effective utilization of maure is not ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a given area. For proper calibration of manure spreader, see attached information sheet. Table 2. Maximum application rates for traveling gun system. Tract Field Acres Inches/ Hr Max./ Cycle (inches) Max. Amtl Cycle (ac.-in.) 387 la 9.0 0.30 0.90 8.1 387 lb 12.3 0.30 0.90 11.0 387 4 4.0 0.30 0.90 3.6 388 la 15.0 0.20 0.60 9.0 388 lb 3.4 0.20 0.60 2.0 388 I c 5.8 0.35 0.70 4.0 388 2a 3.0 0.2 0.60 1.8 388 2b 9.0 0.20 0.60 5.4 388 3 3.6 0.35 0.70 2.5 388 4a 7.9 0.35 0.70 5.5 388 4b 4.9 0.35 0.70 3.4 388 4c 4.2 0.30 0.90 3.7 388 5a 0.8 0.30 0.90 0.8 388 5b 2.7 0.30 0.90 0.8 388 6 6.2 0.30 6.90 5.5 388 7 7.2 0.20 0.60 4.3 388 8 10.5 0.35 0.70 7.3 388 9 7.4 0.35 0.70 1.6 Total 80.3 ac-in MANAGEMENT OF WASTE APPLICATION No matter what method is used, waste is to be applied to crops and/or pasture during the growing season when needed for nitrogen benefits or as needed for irrigation water as long as nitrogen limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded. The waste storage pond levels will be pumped down prior to December to allow storage during the winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively growing to take up nutrients. The waste is to be applied to the fields and crops listed in Table I within the nitrogen limits listed. Waste will not be applied in such a manner that results in waste runoff or over application of nutrients. Application rates must be based on current waste analysis and applied to actively growing crops. Waste must be analyzed as close to the time of each application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. Additionally, a representative Soil Fertility Analysis shall be conducted annually on each application site receiving animal waste. The ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN results of these test shall be maintained on file for a minimum of three years. Proper records, including maintenance, repair and irrigation (waste application) records, shall also be maintained on site and in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells or within 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the farm operator. Animal waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public rights -of -ways by runoff or drift. The Division of Water Quality Regional Office in Mooresville will be notified at 704-663-1699 as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters. b. Spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting animal waste to the application sites which results in, or may result in, a discharge to surface waters. c. Any deterioration or leak in a storage pond. d. Failure to maintain adequate storage capacity in a storage pond that poses an immediate threat to public health or the environment. e. Overspraying animal waste either in excess of the limits set forth in this plan or where runoff enters waters of the State. f. Any discharge that bypasses a a storage pond. Also, refer to Required Specifications, Irrigation Calibration, and Waste Sampling. (attached) ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Name of Farm: HARRIS DAIRY Faciliv Number: 13-7 Owner/Mana er A reement 1 (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and . maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: JOE B. HARRIS Signature: od• Date:_ 3117I00 Name of Manager (If different from owner): Signature: Name of Person Preparing Plan Date: KEN COUCH Resource Conservation Specialist Cabarrus SWCD Certified By: MATTHEW J. KINANE Affiliation: USDA-NRCS Phone No.: 704-788-2107 Address (Agency): 715 CABARRUS AVENUE WEST CONCORD, NC 28027 1 Signature: If OL Date: b3 ! a y la 000 tr i a lot I :1 �v iE , .-r7+j t�•? �irf' •. "'C °� i y 'q�., res . ° ° r � � ,t„_. 1. `o �f����' �lt�;. ht��, � y'1 ,�, ti� ,�g� r l4' ,• pA II • �� * +�� �^� � ` - f� ''�4�`I��p r� �fl �i p_ I l f� ,�• �a � i,� �. � i!s sL f OR OF i � �� >rti�;/r�� f r � '• • • ') � t � j � ,, (},ram ONO w Ea 00 V �� tru •• �• i"" -��J'y 1{��,' �^�. ,i� � w � d��; r yA�cS ' ]i wl 4 fl s G1t1 X A INS po ol 4k °�r ',,`_ w i ai+rw n s %' Is,K $ c:..• "7� �'�/` .; ��' 'i' t,LY r !� w ra i� f `, y� �t`� b . �t.� Ip scy c !' � ,+� ylh¢ '.f�jj! eT� •' J �� " k ��:�� O q• t r •- ,C 1. .. till Jk� Illy • `psi ` �bt a "� y �.. I `:aj�•f ^�a'la � .-� -. G o ,,.a D ;��� f� I, M1 � , fo- ,b All- 13 EP i . 40 All tk ' rL'•rf �/mob/,• 'f � , �� ' P � -.� r - - I �.T �9� i„�"""' ✓ , \. ; � `�•,, � v �, . '� �tk' ;Q + n n U Ards 1 r'k ,. �.4 ' � �• � `" � ��- is h ��-yj� � • �• r4 „"� �. ' � �;� 9 i O.�y aC`,r r�,�` A . r�, �� ��� , � t � ��` � /���333�� [� !1 � � i {�y��'r . � �� •t,l � i kf L � "b r� ,,,r• r44 � jJ Ilk a s "fir n b 04 a .,. , ,; it �' is•. i '�t'� �+' VN� J / \ .. �. � . �-• 4 _ � •moo O � ": .' ' ` . 10;r�0 11 aa�V .f�'1"T,• ; � �rL ��1��1 :iiiifi1 ` .`' •51, �. � Yn LS�'h r4 L� ., ' Yf`i lti .KIM, �N t:�J,�.� V{11 � �•.+'y� " / r .���• i`7y .�, +y[.,. .` � ?r�' •1lOt'`�''Nt r.0. AFL MGM. OT 015 11.4 Vol ••} 4 S.� �l� i �� i✓`r ♦ '�'+ fly .}.L ` ` .o ►' ",1�14 f+1 + ram` • F�� �l, .�j��:yY��� r'�;:^�ji' ,lit' tr:' : i 1yel• .. 'r r�.'� f` - Ina\. � F3 , I .i•+4 7 11l.�lP.� 1` 1�7_AV �fN � 1 ' •f :J.S�. .. �. �t yt.7' f��f�r;Y ij?fi: �r ® �'. .��• rp,„ ,!�_ . k.N ,•`�)' �.1�,���►�a.f�'�•�„j' ,ji:�� .p.r-,j�4 ��i: r.-,: f r,,}}.t `�jj tA'�(i't�[r V]y�11 - >, •'i L` • }i, � �'' +,{r ��:,�, v` _ I .f�A:�`gl •J,. '�r { rr i.{1 f 'r �H" _+~A •,{' �� <`�j Ir'M t�'i Y t,��"�\' f{ 4 •�y`�•ytHr" l�'F,i� .r �.�J •1.ltal:.l V'��� � .:;��1'�� ti,"• �'�• ,h• '� - �����f'�� ;�...,;!'y�{, `' j�?f_ CTt:I ss.: r ' �••� � C .� I . `�!. jn' ,F .fit 1' /,,*�S':a7-'�^-w' � Mc r 4- 41 kk Ki '•it�,' "�.t„,,�.'�`� i ,!',�:ij'�' ,� ,,y?.l 'ij 7�'- ' • r F , `� � i _�-:�r�'• -i .I .r ` �ti � .� �� d .� � � iI � J/ '� A r f �',`• � Ar�„ C10 7,., ,�� , � ' - VIM J .I'���.. .�xn �'• � 1 ,� �.t„ t DO .1'J "'�+�• `•K: ! �� i• , `, �J7 ..Yrlf , ��•{wF..� •1' i ,� � ;� s>a ,'_�' ,,y' , rr �` `�, fit. � , •\•, '� � ' (J 1 fW I "CC!!1 •i �71 �s ,, 1 , F th����' d I'�, it `',`-1 i f , { ',�j ..lrk•+ .I`1 ,1 . � ���t r �l i 1�.f.i' _ - ,�""'`--, ��� a •tip., �,. rVl' ��11. .. r+��� (�+ • 31, I '�t ,��fr .'p��• •+flrr-�!' jf� •� v �...;^�iyc 1i. �,,{]y���t, i )/ IANt,f, ,� . ., � r : ff7:'+ ! �: r � ; rit < �>t• ,N.. i '�,, • �.� ii a ;,,, '.� �-.•- �,`-'sx:•., h�tv ' 4 4-./ �]� �1 A n,.r� ,fir, �� ...r' "�'� �%•' •r t J� Jt ' 'k. ` k11w�f�r �„'�. �� W ftLL�j++;�jjjf ` '.* �S'y h ' � tiy. '`�,,... L j rF,l+'•S�. 4. .i �.� �,`,.. \'�.Iy. .. _ •. ,.•'�� �. .t. ~ ��•: y :, y!�{ ttia ,••• r i�f�;,. �,` I . r '}`', •vim-„ r ' / w�.. ��.... ; : �fs- ..f r r �f 'r}} �' •`. A +f.:*1ti:G' I�. s ilk" ) V`�• 7 ' ;�.j`Hl� _. 1JL ` •� � � AL ''� ' is �!,�,. ' �' k , `k�='i'' • ` �r� r ! r ' If • �• ��,�� ��� •'�ti �' {rr X -� '4, �-'! tr,!i�,i;e- Y' .! `• :.�i s f.,j:', � _ �� 4 {'I,��i'�" � r �01••, I.ilk ,� +��• r/..,�, �10 7Ird(A::1P r ♦ .c !.`t rr h €t+ F -•i p y .r'L 4i •�.. {firit tv AlK -� Ord_• '.ti .. .� T. �iSC7.3.. _,:. �:�•F %•�ftJ r'ti .`1' .' Cc,'• {•.r + i ta' ,1 If7 Lam• � �'- r. {`. N• e' r r '�' � •`•' �"'d�.�.,-7 ••• `,�'S''',�'yyllt.l, j tea¢ f L! r•/ .. � ! sus t � �f,^ F �, i �.. �f•� T•� ( +� j� ,�i� 4 �'- • �,�rM� t rt i'1• .! ' �I� ,�r�.�A•.l+ti' �•, '; �s, r!3AJ�:," 1�. •�+`i' �,l�S •. ., rr iw,, i,1 �'� '. 'tip ,"' .� Il�r �' •� _;•_. .F,• C' 1 k►� .'' iFJ''• +r NO J�` r. ' f .Yr�li>f 1■ 1•�j{e a rll �f: f'° r• Ali �:*';'7 fa�rf/y �� ;'i, :I t , � ,' - j. � .�'.� �).qj��� � � 1. •- [`[` "}�� ��� •, .`•f i' . •'ter,+ �� ��* �T � •'• ;Y• P_"` � r •.a,«1:37,. /�--'+',�'y,Sf,��,Jsu _.e.,. I+����t \,i � y4L�.}� �t:5!• Ir I{i.�� � � �Y.j�,`�f 1 s'.',�, t � l�' • .. _ ; T•..�• f. '� �:,� yr ,cr '� ? 4 _ • t�: � +' j.".. • �� ' . ,• �.� �rS.}i Y' �j�' �y. .j. • r rr f • �e'. t.i� ; .i .J<.�,�fi'r►a-{`!'��t th i,.. ,rlys, .d -. �? i ,} '^'-.lti ••' J � f , •• ` "t � ti1!'I � r� Y trams ��5;•, .�.�' .��f ... .r-1 t` ` ': a +. •y�` �);,, �f = Y,t { },l�►��y� (!i , . .r 7 , }•' 1 '�� lam' �• '`• • �rl ! •r ;;S,a q;', �f "1.�° ?'t : "g ! .... Ni�"Ih / 4 { :� + i 4 / .• Y;.t ' ,,�l3�jY6� f + 1 ����.r �� Ir { +�MT`rfV .'��'� ••;�� t` ty1„i i �... ^}i 4���, �7�'�-S-�fY�{.v`-{r., _,�;rr; ` �I� ( i y ;:�,•.,l,�r.''`st��:,.✓� . J� _ �+G+.-. -v• ' � a .�,�y,; 1�a 1, '�� wl+' ` Ty ''i:=k• y"40'• i• r f d �ytit"Irl +• � ,,_l.�• �• lr rit,+�� i 611 �'(1 ����{�t�f' "'r� _ � �w.i!,t���.•��L=1��fF��'' `�� �. ��• ly��''�'r",.�,�++fir; ,���'`,��.v� �• i .�'�I.�'F". `' tea,+ y, 1 Y+' .�nr i'. .rTy. 'r+;:,' �F,L i!—_,�yl' �•q,S.'•},� 4 �u �l' 4,i'i, I I •..�i�'r1v'*+' Ay',J.1T , ' F w�•� 1 "l►�• ' ', I...,.f � � 1%i! � ��}�j� {4;, � '.F Q y • �.3 f r/,J ••+} r� �.�. Il• �`LM . � ��. + �'+. •+4 �-�'.�', '.i•J 1 . f -L Sr,.�; S r+'. r '' i.F/ :.; C;j^ � rl tip.' : � �%• -7y� � t �, .y i \ I � . � rA �,; / t {:1/ � '' • t ' 115f"" � r[ ,dy p��11 ' • 1 ; I .; J +. �py1� t �..•,L��,J�i:�`�'.�' �sl '3�-'lG,+�,�.�'i'Y .,� =�.•� v.���i ���5 .��,t�«�`'�'S. r` a ` �5�+7 i Lc'L.',��lh� [��� i:-'r.ti'.r �'q .�, ��1.:.5��-::a='�" /I�� l�,h��r '�+l•��`�"'• �" _ „ _ i.".;err 41� i. 1� yr'f •r�'`��i. F rs',,' auj ` r�,` •r� S .� u. � . R.t ' �i �� ,! ,�i.����F'�•,.. t..ta /fijd'� 1. ,i,, A. .k 41.\ , .'' it � .ti �` �e},?�i!• ,�` Y + ? ��y� 1.1y 'T.•`.���,� h�. ✓� � ` a;F.t�.� r w� � � �f � f,�I� •� ., : r ..-JI �4 �' ^'zi �.�. •it A�#1�,.Y}��� '�="•.T M+, Y.; R '/`i.�! I.t� �•���� i T y�•''Y'fi 'i=,.^� c r 5 T` -i'y �� 1 1'} ' i' "'CC..77 ,,. '_,��•s' • I ,L�` •. �,y« t�,ca: �F. Wit--:',�{,;��l: • (:li .l �:�(/'irr �`' f, t / r , ? r''."�,. �!e-. ." �=A •.`�' ''Jyrii �'� �,� ,tyl ���['�/',��yet�,.. f4kv��.-.�11 _•,�tir`='���i �-!f-��-,�If,"l-'` ,`��''ll��.,. ��r• � r�'r"'�� �.`•"^� � �~ ' q,��j}�. " -' � , w �'ity �`V �riwLl� ,' ; `�7U'�iF . T`' •'(+¢,��' rl ` ai Y gS6,_ia11 j � ��! / IfSIC �+' iN�� ,�•lif(,i"{ ..:�`j"'.r, t4 1 1 il�.yr!' 1 _ �I''F�_+ri,•', �,�+ :4`: i `.aFi ", r, t►•• � �, •.r' �Y y.� -•„t, - � '\fir', I ��i.�! t'•x.,.'� � �w �,.•'.ry ',.,li(Aj 11r ./►i; . �. v. 1 �:z:: � y�'�j(1�.�_ � �+'};�, �., 3„' ray `�i!i:•,,• � �,`i1 i"••fir �' ^."i .. .w _ .__.. /`, �.. --� -�.r.L -.,. ....._.....- � � :' •{JI ,�/ 1�.._ri w. _r, „lyl �r� 1 j�1 lk 1 1 ..^f 1 i'• f �'�• �' � ��t4r � /� jr'�r � �� 1 r � r/�:I ������.�;;,�r�k��.��•t�r i �ilT'.I ri � � , :� 7r�,lY'i� / .,�a�� .�� �",��t � J"/'.11 r ,.f ✓`'� '+v �!!!{ � �iaa, r• r�� rt r' J�, f , f� F v vY �� 1• • �{1t F• �Er f� �'� � •�`• k ►'� 6` � � �' i" is��f 1P�� � Yv� ` ����i'if'� �� . ��i J' ���`�' 1 � �. � ! r�1Vj� .s�'?-`4r1`,.� .•�iJ `�.'-. T` ' �ter. '1a V �� ` bj. �� a�'�yf• A f - %4y�•j l' .hjF �-y,�f' I��•T ;J�r, n'�, •�y r•.', r!,Ip r.%i�Ft1:d6�*��1''•�9 ..- � 1J � �:�r } `•`.\CTr=�!•r�-_•..r ytI � (f5"a3�( .J`,4� r.�.11 a\_ :�.V,�; : r(� �7 ��' �'"�4q�� (.I_y .I��t4�t.. ,'� r'f l;J,S .+•'1� I,�..A'�• ••'�l,�rY:� f , lip j' ^•;•', .M1 ,r ' tr• 41�ti,_' �', •ram'Yi, ,'i' r -, r f� �j ,/ . i •�, ti /� f rez Ci , . / / rr4x � •H ��a;4•j�1 � tiJ f� }, � � a,Y• 04 0 '! •, :1 �a 1 ,/► f ' �•, y y � fir' SSk��� ! �y,�� ,` RF7 Q `,• .�a.• awn, !j I' , i�'11+:�� "' t .'' •� '� 1.1 ,, �<r.. 4+15� • f�ii��, 1. i )ll ,j- I �,: '' a 117 G' � ...,.•"t!A'f�,�;�.,��1• �9 t IdA' r E Ma8 a8 n •. `dr JQ '' •':' '' ' i� ` Mal M `+ Aa8 h 6 e �. •'P lam' MMeB aDI�haoz r f a M 8 T ' e6' t � } . i„" � ,CFi�'��ar��3 ; � Ch ��• IdA ,�s 1r�, i t r` Ch o ;�,' .� e e� 4r Ypi . �nq • •... P, oEnu EnB.• IA} ti d EDi e+R `�, MeD eq._.G{y ,Meb �n MeB �a3• ii ` .. a IdA +? idA ��." ,m MeeBEnO �G `` + `BQCk.�; a isa Ch• 'i ii CuB2 t,� ,. _ � 'i yM IdA- En L9WILCuB 2 It r . r„ l!- Y. ! e LU a � ��Y L��� -r� •' � 'r� Y�I'• R � .r "rJ��. •1A tt P �., • r� _°"�'� .. � �w�� '.sir`••, • *" � ,, , ` AaB- EnD a J `'41�:FS{. "'r s s, � �•'' - .��= ;ems•' i 1 ,Jr�J �� :'�.',+� Fitfw} [a t� •" I•i-,:;ir•y � ..7L�4 �.�(a;�. `�,ra � u�� 9Sl�i���,_5': if pJM• ��•;'v „i�+�, �� _,rn:. t' !A:• �•f:iir •�`_��ri r• :' i IF ■ f �1C �i(r5y r3o1'{��.�ry.� r`'". .r�.,y{{i r r� •,�,4'y J 1�•M �S�; +'��.�[�,'il�{fuf •her, �S�?' t ��s �s;.,y�1r'�i��f�.'lY `f�`'�'�f � ?i�ef.,i J".f'�••� ~{=r 'rti, , r ` r a. . o T. � � '� n ;f�•'.?�, J' � c �r4 � -\ �+ 1 � Cyr � _- EP Rr 94 0/ fJ"' i.sY,'i, ,r a D.. y //I .�- ° Q-/y-✓}-w� A''I1"nj-.� � .f+ S•T+�f � * � � � ' „: , ;ti' '�j•� } r7J ;j .�. � , ! x�!r ��i.,a k +k 5,`�� - . •g f�i• _ / r d f - \' Q ` �3S 1 y� ; # 4 ;i u . ; a to0 JA t � s j3Y' E ` 1i'_+. y �° � r W 4, ',5 n°`''�` -° �°\ ?. '} S►�i`,- #.il r s ' ✓ R i r 1 " ' fir 'M ✓ `1� ,(„� 1 Q� -. ! f r� i � � � / a e� a �T�„ / � i - ' SS x^ 0 uCk „ ch „fit � � `'� o '��''� � a � ! � ', !t r � `'Xi•`+� � rf 9 � f' � A ` 1 1 �4S -s AT Q All Ally °' f �;�`= L L ��', rl.� >�J � s ' c• •'i•fl�Z_Nt I�- 0 ��. r '� ..t i, 11, 1i�iilli��. _ i�%1. g��'.� i'•. .� �4, ,'/� � � r�rl` � • ��, i . �"� 1, ��o • Q,:. .r�fl -�' '-` "� � �1r �F�".%. •�"�>r Vy �'r.� •?� '�, 7_ �r� r 4 j,t j �. i-.7)�LY�a. +!� �.,� ”. SAS 3 `•a-� ` '1. � rN-~l' AFp7� -A. f S - s t� �`�! i,�`5 �N' `>( ri "j.'"L *r yjt� r ro �•. j tJ -t, }•a 6 ? t t4 a ��� a a s�? �l71 .x. ` p : , s, J r.i � _��` 1.:. "�t�' r '�� .� �•° e�.""CC 4 w F' z ,, v, '� �,y9. mm WWI Zip CA AA 413 n Now o U� t�g rt r;nr I� 1 i� �a �ij 7 , Fe. 1 • �o �>' �t '"!`.� �,F•'i /�'�r���'..�!' t rF �r-a Y Ir �� I ,.,� + r '�a •� ,z '� . F'• � �� {� ��..`. F, 7'.1�Y5�.1 At���I�lrt��r7i.�'�) �;.�yl�/a � 3 fk r°".�aA'� S T.r ? ' 17 .7IN,dL �' '� • 4, �^�. .'C f.. r �r � 1, al ^•r'4.. r - 1 �/1 J.t.. -ti'% r �. _ ��1� ,l 99. P.9 { ii; �� �.�'T { Jir°��'��'- () 'P- •����`�,-a�f�'Il' � � � � '� � `? ,�?� /�•�} t'aw .� y � "VA of V�, .•rry' ,sy' �. wk .4 '�i it.+ii 4 - tti� � � = �, � y'i•31'I �'N�t � �J 7J �r-�� r.. 1[71� �J� i �-K �.?�, .Y�,.�,/�l'Y��ke...,.� ° • ) r, 11' �� � ` � ,t' � � n.: `7- s Rl L�l,i/ ! 5 *{� r�r"'. {r^� f"r�I� Ui ,�, t rC �l�j "•�.�..., ty, ". � �1 p .�� a�°a au'. CALIBRATION OF MANURE SPREADERS Effective utilization of manure is not possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a given area. Calibration of your spreader is a simple and effective way of improving utilization of nutrients in manure more effectively. Only by knowing the application rate of your spreader can you correctly apply manure to correspond to your crop needs and prevent water quality problems through the over application of animal manure. Applicators can apply manure, at varying rates and patterns, depending on forward travel and/or PTO speed, gear box settings, gate openings, operating pressures, spread widths and overlaps. Calibration defines the combination of settings and travel speed needed to apply manure, bedding or wastewater at a desired rate and to ensure uniform application. Spreader Capacity Liquid spreader capacities are normally rated by the manufacturer in gallons. Multiply by 0.0042 to get tons. Solid and semi -solid spreaders are rated by the manufacturer either in bushels or cubic feet (multiply bushels by 1.24 to get cubic feet). Most spreaders have two rating capacities: (1) struck or Ievel full, and (2) heaped. Calibration of solid manure spreaders based on its capacity (volume) is difficult to estimate accurately because the density of solid and semi -solid manures _. are quite variable. Density is the weight of the manure per volume of manure ( pounds per cubic foot). Manure density varies depending on the type and amount of bedding used as well as its storage method. Therefore, if you estimate spreader application rates as the volume of the manure the spreader holds you are overlooking the fact that some manure weighs more than other manure. This can cause a significant error when calculating manure application rates. Since manures and litters have different densities, an on -farm test should be done. To determine the load (tons) of a manure spreader: I . Weigh an empty 5-gallon bucket. 2. FiIl the bucket level full with the material to be spread. Do not pack the material in the bucket but ensure that it settles similar to a loaded spreader. �. Weigh the bucket again. Subtract the empty bucket weight from this weight to calculate the weight of the contents. 4. 'Multiply weight of contents by 1.5 to calculate pounds per cubic feet, density. OPLNIP--:Mirth 17. 1997--,14n 13 5. Multiply the manure density by the cubic feet capacity of the spreader and divide by 2000 to get the tons of material in a spreader load. weight of S gal manure x 1.3 x spreader caeac-*- (rt 1) Spreader load (tons) � 2000 Solid and Semi -Solid .Manure Spreaders In order to calibrate a spreader for solid manure (20 percent or more solids). the following materials are needed: 1. Bucket 2. Plastic sheet, taro or old bedsheet. An even size, 3 feet by 3 fee;.. 10 fee: by 10 feet, or 12 feet by 12 feet, will make calculations easier. 3. Scales Calibration method: 1. Locate a large and reasonably smooth, flat area where manure can be applied. 2. Spread the plastic sheet, tarp or bed sheet smoothly and evenly on the ground. A. Fill the spreader with manure to the normal operating level. Drive the spreader at the normal application speed toward the sheet spread on the ground. allowing the manure to begin leaving the spreader at an even, normal rate. 4. Drive over the sheet at the normal application speed and settings while continuing to apply manure. If a rear discharge spreader is used, three passes should be made: first, drive directly over the center of the sheet, the other two on opposite sides of the center at the normal spreader spacing overlap. S. `Neigh the empty bucket and plastic sheet, tarp, or blanket. 4 b. Collect all manure spread on the sheet and place it into the bucket. 7. `Neigh bucket and manure and subtract the weight of the empty bucket and ground sheet. This will give you the pounds of manure applied to the sheet. S. Repeat the procedure three times to get a reliable average. 9. Determine the average weight of the three manure applications. l� � 9 r 10. Calculate the application rate using the following formula or Table 5-3: Application rate (tons/acre) lb manure collected x 21.73 sheet length (tt) x sheet width (ft) 11. Repeat the procedure at different speeds andor spreader settings until the desired application rate is achieved. Example: What is the application rate (tons per acre) if you collect 3.5 pounds of manure on a 10-foot by 10-foot tarp during a calibration run? Application rate (torssrac:e) 3.5 lb manure x 21.7 310 ft x 14 ft a 1.35 tons/acre Table 5-3. Calibration of Solid Manure Spreaders Pounds of Manure Tons of Manure Applied/Acre Awlied to Sheet Size of Ground Street 3' x 3' 10' x 10' 12' x 12' 1 0.34 0.22 0.15 2 0.63 0.44 0.30 3 1.02 0.65 0.45 4 1.36 0.37 0.61 5 1.70 1.09 0.76 6 2.04 1.31 0.51 7 2.38 I.52 1.06 S 2.72 1.74 1.21 9 3.06 1.96 1.36 10 3.40 2.13 1.5I 15 5.10 3.27 2.27 20 6.81 4.36 3.03 Many times it may be necessary to adjust the rate in which waste is applied from the way it is normally spread. Changes in application rate can easily be done by increasing or decreasing the speed in which the waste is being applied. In order to perform these calculations, the spreader load (tons), duration of application (minutes), and the average width (feet) of a normal application needs to be known. The application rate and travel speed can be found using the following equations: Application rate (tons/acre) . spreader load (tons) x 495 time (min) x width (ft) x travel speed (mph) spreader load (tons) x 495 Travel speed (mph) ' time (min) x width (ft) x application rate (ton"cre) OPUMP--North ! 7, 1997-o73;e _0 Example: What speed should you run if you wish to apply 4 tons of manure per acre with a 3-ton spreader? Your spreader application width is 20 feet and ,your spreader empties in 6 minutes. Travel speed (mph) - 3 tons x 493 = 3, i moh 6 min x 20 it x 4 tonstacre Spreader Pattern Uniformity To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed. place a line of small pans or trays equally spaced'(2 to 4 feet) across the spreader path. The pans should be a minimum of 12 inches by 12 inches (or 15 inches in diameter), but no more than 24 inches by 24 inches; and 2 inches to 4 inches deep. Viake one spreading pass directly over the center pan. Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the contents into equally sized glass cylinders or clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each. The effective spread width can be found by Iocating the point on either side of the path center where manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. The distance between these points is the effective spreader width. The outer fringes of the coverage area beyond these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a uniform rate over the entire field. "Flat -top," "pyramid," or `oval" patterns are most desirable and give the most uniform application. ";vi," "W," "steeple," or "lopside" patterns are not satisfactory and one or more of the spreader adjustments should be made. Mortality Management Nlethods (check which mechod(s) are being implemented Cy Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water. Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7 Complete incineration J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the Department of Agriculture r :=1 Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached) December 15. 1996 Suurce Cause !rn•tl's to Minimize Udur Site Specific Practices Lilt staliuns Agitation during sump lank ❑ Sump lank covers . Iillitig alai drawdown - N R 1:11d fif diainpiper at 9 Agilalion daring wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath labnun conveyancc lagoon liquid level NA Laguna -;III races 0 Volatile gas emission; 0 Proper lagoon liquid caluncily;��— • Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon sinrlup procedures; • Agilalium ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio; Vr Minimums agitation when pumping; 0 Mechanical neratiou; 17 Proven biological additives h6ptium sprinkler •. I Iigh pressure agitaliun; ir, lrr'ignle on dry days wilh little or no %vied; males Wind drill ❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure; D Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; Pump from second -stage lagoon; W" Flush residual mtauurtrc from pipes at cud of slurry/sludge pumpings ' Dead annuals Carcass decuntposilion Proper disposition of carcasses Staudiuig Avalcr around • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that, water drains tncilitics . Microbial decomposition of away From facilities orgarr'rc Inatter Mud Uscked onto Public • Poorly maintained access roads t7 Fartn access road maintenance roads from Imm access Addilional h+futmation : Available From : Cattle Maome Managemcid ; 0200 kule/BlAP Packet NCSU, County Extensiun Center Wiry Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Read Field Laboratory, EDAE 209-95 NCSU - BAE Lagoon Design and hlanagemew fur Livestock Mamure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAri hiam Lmucnl of Dairy Wastewater: EBAF I06.83 NCSU - DAE Cafthratiun of Manic and wastewater Application Equipment; LBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - DAE Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Managenieut: Odors and Flies ; . PROM, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension ANK uvernber 11. 1996, Page 2 r Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Source C:lnse 13f►11's to AlGtlnlite Odor Site Specilir 1'ncclices I a,msl�ad Dairy ploducliuu 11 Vegetative or wooded buffers O Vtccommendcd best managctnent practices Q/ Good judgment and common sense fared lots lrr bans alley • Wet manurc-coveted surlaccs Scrapc or Bush daily 5111 I:ll'L'S O Promote drying wills proper ventilation Cl Routine chucks and maintermoce on waterers, hydrants, pipes, stuck larks 1lcddcd alcas 0 Ul ine FRr1'rolnute drying with proper ventilation • Palfiai microbial decomposition Replace wet or manure -covered bedding �hlanulc dl y sImks • 1'al lial 111iC1'ollial dcculllpositioll i'rovidc liquid drainage ror stored manure Slowgc tank m basin • I'mlial microbial decomposition ; ❑ 11ollmn or mid-Iml loading 5111race • Mixing while filling ; 0 Tauk covers • Agitation when emptying ❑ ' Basin surface mats of solids; Vr.Minimim lot runoff and liquid additions 19"' Agitate only prior to manurc removal ❑ -Proven biological additives or oxidams Sculillg 11:ISIn surfaces l':utial Microbial decomposition 0 Liquid drainage. Isom settled solids • Mixing while tilling; C3 Remove solids regularly Agitation when emptying pk _ Nimmie, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading ❑0 Soil injection of slurrylsludgcs shlca[lel. UHIICIS • Volatile gas emissions L Wash residual manurc from spreader after use ❑ 11tovcn biological additives or oxidants tlncumcd 11MIMlr, • _ Volatile gas emissions Mile ❑ Soil injection of slurrylsludgcs shnry 111 Sludge 1m field drying '❑J Soil incorporation within 48 hrs Sul IflCcs 1s�1 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying 0 Proven biological additives or oxidants blush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon O Mush lank covers; liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Extend Sill lines to uenr bottom of tanks with anti -siphon vents N, A' . Outside Blain collection • Agilativit during wastewater ❑ Box covers 01 juncliull bUxcS collveyrincc AMOY00"4�',cluber 11, 1996, Pale I �� o u Suarce Cause BM. to Control Insects Site Slrccilic Practices Animal I luldinb Aicas Accwmilatiuns ul'animal wastes O Eliminate low areas that trap moisture Along and feed wastage fcuces and other locations where waste accumulates and disturbance by animals is 1minimal. ' ® Maintain fence rows and filler strips around animal holding areas to nrinio1i7C accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and remove or breakup accumulated solids as Ui y Alantnc I landlinb Accnnmlaliuns of.mimal wastes Cl Remove spillage on n routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 Systcros day interval during suinmer; 1 S-30 day interval during winter) where manure is loaded for land application or disposai. O Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles. O - `Insimct for and remove or break up accumulated wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure handliug areas as needed. For mute iufinmation contact the cunperalive Extension Service, Ucparlment of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613. AA -II -tuber 11. 1996, rage 2 `, r Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations �Suurcc C:+usc BMI's to Control insects Site Specific 1'radiccs Liquid Systenls F111511 Grultels • Accumulation of solids ❑ flush system is designed and operated so,"e, 1�S a�- suff iciently to remove accumuhted solids Rom Ice-" 5ot� gs gutters as designed. f-1 Remove bridging oraccumulatcd solids at ivc�o 1no1.A.: Qo>n�.S. discharge La-Uu11s a11d rlts • i lUStl't1 S(tllll5 ❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits wheiC (:iDMnR�..�rl. o►a�f,�e►tk-+t+ev1 pest breeding is apparent to minimize the a„�a =.pw,�s vy� ofk- td1i�5 crusting orsolids to a depth of no morc than G - 3 inches over more than 30%orstlrrace. Qvw.Qtv►o, Excessive VegOalive • Decaying vebetatiun ❑ Maintain vegetative control along banks of Glowth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent accumulation or decaying vegetative matter along %vater's edge on impoundment's perimeter. Dry Systems Fccdcrs feed Spillage ❑ Design, operate and luainiain feed systems (e.g.. bunkers and troughs) to minimize the vccunlulation ordecaying wastage. Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter). Feed Stol age Accumulations of Iced residues ❑ Reduce moisture accumulation within and around immediate perimeter of reed storage areas by Insuring drainage away from site and/or providing adequate containment (c-g., covered bin for brewces grain and similar high moisture grain products). . 9( inspect ror and reinove or break up accumulated solids ill tiller strips around reed storage as needed. nn1► vembcr 11, 1996, rage t (,P� /046� .4. 1- 'rt J.J l.. J y4- th LL 70 r bl CA h.4. 14 n a'. ,r•. ,. .. ...,. .F.. _ „•., o.........,.i ti f.�.I: 1.fiP:.f�-I..:uii,..rx,r:,:.r..��,r.tti.: ars.. , ^. r:c-,,':i zrw.:ti f* N«t t "',t w.1-,41''v.'ti�'lDl4`>@��iri,�+jFSn•.R!-»,:pa::r..;l.,:l.�".--�•=-'-�•�=.sit,.1, '�31�'W:�" :/ '3'-! ... a,� F : ' :_� ! I � ��QQpp .I i.l , � � F 1 1 { e � iW)•? � I •1 � :,: f r. ' , ' �, ' Y ' ' a i 1 '�_ `' f I � T ` .I 1 _.. _ .-t _ ,!•i_! F ''r• .i.- I� - _i.i ` :�� ' _ •, d+ SS � .7. .. . r •'f •�.f,� �1i'r- j -! ii-f � � •� •IQ �`•{ Cr-� -rJ. i. i I ; +i: t''!•( i_� ( ,'i 1 i :� { �rl {�1tk �1 1 i(r( . l,.q..l ��. i.^� .3 •i .; 1 1 1 ' ,,€ j I I , �.!�,'}, .�-�' T_�., tr��, 1 ! i_ , .l •.r Ir��:Fk:i-� i"�f. , +3 . .� r � i I i � } I y � �' } ' F ! • _; ! �-�� .T � i 1 I � �i—" a . .. .( , - •i-.3 ii .-f .i ..�.. t. 1 - ! , r .' .. .1•.1 .l,_I _i.,_1�1. 1 .F L..L • r ! � 1 •i ', • `. ' •�• ! ; � .� I 1 ~• ! F _, i E 1 1 . L .3 � , , i -( �' , i I f_ i -I ' l ` + j .i f I j •r _. r i � 1 + .I 1'�'1i , •�_ -� •1_ •�-: �' , '! I '•r i I `! f',- - F i , 5--. , , .j .i j._i - � i � ', ! ., , �/� .�.. �r _, 'i �'� � : 1( : ' '+ j I ; : ii • i € i i i {.. i { ? , j i ; i I . i I •1 i •, - .� •1 ,� � 'r I f i ��~ I 1-; •E .j -_ .� � , ' , ...� I. +_ "t !•_l _{._+-_r h. f, , ? ;._; ..r , .. j ! i( y� � �•f _I ,�....�., .j .i..�.�.� _I ' -i 1'r I-+•+ I, 1 F i ] l rf, AS, -, •( � t I ; ,' , 11 .���:.,� ,..a \1`..F. .r .i .i �'•j - - rt}�,' r �S•;}'•f�.• 'I • ! + ' • 1 : _... �. i j � i _l. I ..: i ? _ .; i , i � : ; _� ' � I .'1� .It'i' - i• I —�� ' -€ i ! r 1 j � I � '� � �i � -� . i �.Ji'•�JJ. I � _ .i SN 011 • ' - - � ' € ,( E.:{_j 'j .F. { .j f 1 � ` -_ i { �! � . i � ' h� � .�. i ' i f ! ,� ' ; �� ` ! �'t ��(9 .itL•� I:.�,rrr row 1' I -� - i F. •11 v1 ; -I' ` I T (�, IV Y`! _, - ' •.' a '..}-j ' 1 I 1? ,,,.1�; II I '_ i-}�! '• .�_.11�• ! II�_�.i� 1J !'� �1 , i I{ 1 .{ ,I .,�. J-•f ,_.! ` L +_ :, .�. i rA it j r y I + ' �D } • �i -,. , 4 _�. . r. �..i .iw. I 1 +� , I ' 1 I j ` )I� i � 1 , � { � f , i 4 '� g .i I ,� -T . I . i � �'� ; � { ' •�•. � i 1 I S-.� . i (_.� (J � i! i r I..! i I{ •, f r 1 _, ' y' .1 3,`t r { i€ S�' § ., 1 i' T E• ti s , , s a I t � -4 ' .1, € I ! � �1 .9. ! I i 1 F ;. ( ' � 1 , _' 1 •�•-I _� I � r t � �ka i ! :{ • - I � 1. '� s '�i ; ... � i � , i i � � �1 i 3 ' i y - • -y + , f } a Y f . r . , �•''_.1 ,. F... • j 1 _ •(• ! f K ! a: ' : 1 1 '• i.Or-� �. .0 i i i• I"_ � -I„r r 111 '�' • i 'I � 10 t I I � i j t �. .., f � f !. _ � r €•�-1 _�� � 1'i i � �� 1-E. �- -�' '_ �.1 i•;��.:I-;•--�.; . ; I I € s €. i f r 1 t J t-.1 fit_€• r t f_ , _7._ f t i � i.i j'!_I r I � { ,1 , 1•-� �• 'ram ( f i'i�r `- i ' ( 1 = t j {R ( ��: (_S.i = T' I , ♦ o i - :'! ! (`q•� ir 1141 r--- I i • I 1 ; i ! !- i� 1 i '• �'^ �i _f t- 't' _ ' •_, _.'-_:_ ,� r, ,..1 �.. . r i{ t ., y j :� ; •y , .. ! j y�.1 I I 3 I i f f'i , 1 1 I �r 11 i 5 1 a I_ jj, �. _ 1 1 i i fj � L j am•; � r I} f i �11 t�• I i�( i t F.. ,. I i- I i^ 1' ' �' � j i s li ' - I I t i �•1.4..i �'"I } i 11;( I..' ! :�1 F. I F I �( %•�•�- ( I 1 � I �_ ' I _�I, 1 I i r e h I 1! I� r# i 1 1 f ►'! 1 i 1 1 i_ i s • ', r 1 + � i.^C.S_}_1 r I i:..T r f •_ £ ,� + ! S i..s # �}; rqr• '�. _ ; � Y^''"!"i I�'}"-' '—� _ � t-{ • 1.�._r...i_! ; 1 !.; i.r-• :�•; ! ' i '� 'O ..r,,�`' ; �' /€-7.� �. 1.1l��.3�.�_I_� � r �I slSr:1' I s:=it. ' 1- �• i I ...� � i i - i i ,_ jY� �A ' : -(' -r•.i i ' 1 I•w r' ; r'i ! .l 1 ' F� I •v��` ��• �_ r t ; - ._. . • , ., . _�_ _I '_�- � ; �' ;.. , r : 3 � i ii r 1• i��-�-,. ;: f : � .�. 11 i Jp � , '1 _ i-1.L 1-'-i � _ ! I I ' ! � 11..1.I 1 1 ! I '.J-; I j i , i �' a i i li'- I .•; ! (. � ' j` 1 '��, ;•1 S'S'r� I-r 1 � [ -' � I i "f j- I � 1 i r �',U}• � (�; �' { : � I �"; ! I� I\ � _�_..4 r �_�IT .• s ' +. ' i i -1_i ! e , r �-I• -} !• r ;.i_E.,�:. ; I �., i I. '�►,.�.�~ i� J � i - ! I G ., ; ; I"3•_ .�`r-.T _ 1.. I r y. i. I_ i. i..y E Y !. ,�. ..(�,! L. �, l.. i...i._!. �-� ,. .;- �-F-`- �.- •\`_i..l . � r j '. ;- I } ! ' •1• y � .!. ' r (�t i _I 1 r i.. i j -J- F I 1' j j I �• • r• ' 1 r E{` + . j� t` i i_ If'i I_. 1: 1 i ,�~ { 1• O 4,. �;-[ � � ( ' 1 i r i (._i_• �_• 1• '1� L (. j :O +• • I' .,, j'. i, LJ.� 1 i �' i ?,# 1 I ; f i i i' j-•f ••Il' i_1!•::Ii I- 1 1 i r '..;WL ,, li p i ! i'• '1 I I �! "!. !MF I I I_'- i i : !�' \1-' fit. i ' �1S �+ 1•� • � A r ! i..':.. � ! : , 1 ; r '` 1 _ •-- �� i_ ^� '�,�i, I : ' + I ja 1 O: t \ .1 r _ I ' .. t';' h !' i -:,: �f �. • i I ' 's � '� 1 yt r , I _ , f r-1 1 •. I- . y ��••' t• i. 57.�•..! ':T' I. Zb F�I.i�, �' , � f + ; E � ( : I .{..�-�=i +-,-4^'{t_'}• f-� , ,•,, ._,i ' , r ...-� -i•-r-r;..=�A• pN� _. 1 I r, i j , ;f _ • _.. �. , .1.. j`_..f . r r i i i , I 1 � I `,' ". $ c ! j.• 1 ", i i' �' �, I .!_ I_,_j +' i"i f ' i--4=i• ' i i' V 'i A. i, I (•, . 1 , � I I , 1 L i j t }....'_ , �: t , I ; '! I• , ' 1- -i :.1...,..;!_?..,.}...i—.� � ' � 5 ; � ' i-i•' r � ! r f i, � ;�, ��• � I:{.�_ .j� � f-_•i-�'. �-.! .i '.i f 1 -i-- --� -�-j i ' , ' , + :.€ � ( , S f � i , I ' } �'• ! i � i- , ; cyt • ; I ! r j _' r i i J I �_.� S Li. S. C)rPAF,?Thtt--NT Of' SOIL CONSERI'47-00N SF'RVoCE.' . T -A 'O-A 7 C L�4 1- 4 3 9- wc \)rj\Qv,^C. L aer 4 1 1-4 cr AAi - 0i F-55h-- IF I r go Q0 rs it g! -f— CC MPUTAT.R.'I SHE7r', 'E C L _,'O�v SERVICE S TA TE C /_4AP_K HAP'Zis �-Alm2p_,05�__to BY iYA TE_ Poe plo, -77 1 SUBJECT -S) 7- C- P*STS ST pi, HEE-,.-., OF ILM A 7-pT '2- MO AN2 A!i --f P-1 0 '___nP T t 'A E*q0F_qLS___lw U, _CO,N)GeT__ N5 Fr 0 L 7 L 07-MOM JE, L 66, P- Ru A OFF_FAO ry J! ZGyj�.-.24Ap �p f, 'I33C.Fs�_�0:54) 78_�Fs_- -T 5E cF 35, 0 C-j'_ A-1) WAIZTF. PINE