130001_PERMIT FILE_20171231

wALFA
pG
r
January 7, 2008
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Pleasant Rd S
Concord, NC 28025
ichael F. Easley, Governor
r
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS130001
Porter Farms
Animal Waste Management System
Cabarrus County
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on December
27, 2007. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement
for the lagoon at the Porter Farms facility not to be required until 2009. Due to the amounts of
treatment volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2009.
The results of the 2009 sludge survey are to be submitted by March 1, 2010.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (919)
715-6937.
Sincerely,
7*449�
Miressa D. Garoma
Soil Scientist
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Central Files
NOnthCaroiina
Natlrra!!�
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699.1636 Telephone•, [phone]
Internet: w"vw.ncwatetaualitv.ors Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnative Action Employer— 50% Recyciedlt0% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: [phone]

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
July 10, 2017
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mount Pleasant Road South
Concord, NC 28025
F `
ROY COOPER
Governor
\1
MICHAEL S. REGAN ,
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Porter Farms/Facility 13-01
General Permit AWS 130001
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Porter:
On July 6, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality
Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Porter Farms and the permitted waste
disposal system. We wish to thank Jared. C. Portei, who was present and assisted during the
inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ames B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated July 6, 2017
IS
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quulity Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 4 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ . Other Agency
Facility Number:
130001 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS130001
Denied Access
Inpsection Typo:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Cabarrus Region:
Mooresville
Data of Visit:
07/06/2017 Entry Tim: 03:00 pm
Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident 0
Fans Name:
Porter Farms
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner,
Thomas E Porter
Phone:
704-785-8891
Mailing Address:
4455 Mt Pleasant Rd S
Concord NC 280257659
Physical Address:
4603 Mt Pleasant Rd S
Concord NC 280257659
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farts:
Latitude: 35' 21' 07" Longitude:
80° 26' 40"
Five mites south of Mt.
Pleasant on Mt. Pleasant Rd. (SR 1006). Farm is on the left across from the intersection with Bost Cut Off
Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas E Porter Operator Certification Number: 17560
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Thomas E. Porter Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Jared C. Porter Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector.
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/15/17 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.88 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/03/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.16 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/05/16 > Soil Analysis
U.
Phone: [phone] Exi
Date: It
page: !

Permit: AW5130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 07/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations - Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Farrow to Wean 2,000 1,980
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 866,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WP1 19.00 28.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 07/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yea_
No No No
'
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
ME]
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
[IN
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
110
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M,
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or poten6ai adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
.0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
� ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas E Porter Facility Number. 130001
Inspection Date: 07/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
ate Aonlication
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hey, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 -
Matue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
MEI
❑
Records and Documents
Yea No No He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ M ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the,appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑P
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 07/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea
No No No
Crop yields?.
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 _❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
MCI ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0 Cl
Other Issues
Yea No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ M ❑ ❑
page: 5

type of vtstt: w c:ompuance inspecnon U uperation Keview U Structure Evaluation U 'Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 C=Iaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:. Departure Time: I o,2t0 County: Region:
Farm Name: �01�'C �, G] T Owner Email:
Owner Name:��s Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ��;' ►�tf'y� ��C`'�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: t
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
�F � � -,�': �{ a iv `�.�'. c12 �..� �
Yy � � .':] a' �.: ., ,�Y' '?i' ✓n_r5, t 1 1
'. '�34— 3*,x''�+ � a
,_ 'J:.r •Mt � ,3fu �6iU � F -, � z s 1 � i f: _ i
I 't'g 4, .� "ice � � "' r-""^`I..Y" �'_' -` J/l �!•FIJ 11�
�:: k v.. ak 4'��� `fir. k �I►,%� t' _��
,.
n - �,,�
�. -
_ �S
�-
■
" 1 ' f 1 1
—�
" ydE.3 �,x � ^' � oaf L ��- a Y� �. ■
r
--
-
3
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Y� ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ] Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑NotA
A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes ❑ No A ❑.NE .
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continur

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 1
Waste Collection & Treatment e`
4. Is 'storage capacity {structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Ye o F NA ❑ NE
• a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No KI NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �•
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ►'"1
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yew No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ,.plo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures nced maintenance or improvement?
❑Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures
require [] Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application "
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box
below. [] Yes] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ,
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift
OjApplication Outside of Approved Area
�-
�p�]
"� C
12. Crop Type(s): 1
_
W v ` r
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes�Ta
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes'&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes fI �"'/
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[] Yes Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes `trio ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
�s s es�gn Maps [] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes o ❑ A ❑ NE
Was e A r�ekl F •eeboard is aste rans ers ❑ e
StockiYie Inspection on L{ and 1" Rainfall Inspections ludg� e Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �RNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued
9

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: I Oq(e VAS
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? C] Ye No [] NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
e to complete annual sludge survey —E:rFailure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-c ompliantt sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes_J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Ye ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher t i n ormal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emereg ��ns as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes t=12% [DNA [] NE
❑ Yes )EJ�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes " d' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
January 6, 2016
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms .
4455 Mount Pleasant Road South
Concord, NC 28025
PAT 1Vf� C O R`Y
U—
r
DONALD
R. VAN DER VAART
ACIVIary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Porter Farms/Facility 13-01
General Permit AWS 130001
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Porter:
Dinxfor
On November 18, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Porter Farms and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
1:� 4 -
Bealle Ill, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section.
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated November 18, 2015
Jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
MoonwAlc Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

N
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 130001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS130001
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Cabarrus
pate of visit: 11/1812015 Entry Time: 12:30 pm Exit Time: 2:00 pm
P rt F
Region:
Incident 0
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
Farm Name: o er anus
Owner Email: teporter02Uaol,com
Owner: Thomas E Porter Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 4455 Mt Pleasant Rd S Concord NC 280257659
Physical Address: 4603 Mt Pleasant Rd S Concord NC 280257659
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 21' 07" Longitude: 80' 26' 40"
Five miles south of Mt. Pleasent on Mt. Pleasant Rd. (SR 1006). Farm is on the left across from the intersection with Bost Cut Off
Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas E Porter Operator Certification Number: 17560
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Thomas E. Porter Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Thomas E. Porter Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beall Phone:�yy77�0t�4-663-1699 Exf
Inspector Signature: Date: a81
Secondary Inspector(a):
Inspection Summary:
09/09/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.54 Lbs11000 Gallons
06/25/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.94 Lbs/1000 Gallons
08/07/14 > Soil Analysis
lb
page: 1

Permit: AWS130001 Owner- Facility : Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 11/18/15 Inspection Type: 'Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operatlons Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,000 1,982
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 866,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard. Freeboard
Waste Pond WP1 t9.00 29.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 11/18/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
Cl M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes NQ_No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
O ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste APRIlicaltion
Xes _No No Me
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas E Porter Facility Number:
130001
Inspection Date: 11/18/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
' Routine
sate_ gplication
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Smaii Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑,E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ E ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Ng Ns
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify 1
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑E
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

i
. Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 11/18/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Na
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑ .
Monthly and T' Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ E ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
Cl
0 ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below. ,
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ N Cl ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ E ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ E ❑ ❑
page: 5

t
4
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
December 2, 2016
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mount Pleasant Road South
Concord, NC 28025
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Porter Farms/Facility 13-01
General Permit AWS130001
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Porter:
Director
On September 29, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of. Water Resources (D WR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Porter 'Farms and the permitted
waste . disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ames B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office,
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 29, 2016
Jb
State of North Carolina I EnvuonmenW Quality I Water Reaoorcea I Water Quality Regional Operations.
Mooresville Regional Office J 610 Ent Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 2811_5
704 663 16"

f
Division of Water -Resources
Division of Soll and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
130001 Facility Status:
Acute Permit: AWS130001
'Denied Access.
Inspection Type:.
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit
Routine
County: Cabamis Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit:
09/2912016 Entry Time: 03:00 pm
Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident d
t
Farm Name:
Porter Farms
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Thomas E Porter
Phone:
704-785-8891
Nulling Address-
4455 Mt Pleasant Rd S
Concord NC 280257659
Physical Address:
4603 Mt Pleasant Rd S
Concord NC 280257659
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latltudo: 35° 21' 07" Longitude:
80' 26' 40"
Five miles south of Mt. Pleasenl on Mt. Pleasant Rd. (SR 1006). Farm is on the left across from the intersection with Bost Cut Off
Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas E Porter
Operator Certification Number. 17560
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Represontative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Thomas E. Porter
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Thomas E. Porter
Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector. James
Phone: 7 4 3 169
Inspector Signature:
Date: �•
Secondary Inspector(s):
V
Inspection Summary:
03/31/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.17 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/09/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.54 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/05116 > Soil Analysis
U
page: 1

Permit AWS130001
Owner - Facility: Thomas E Porter
Facility Number.
130001
Inspection Date: 09/29/16
Inpsection Type: ' Compliance Inspection
Reason for Vtsit:
Routine I
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean
2,600
1,992
-Total Design Capacity:
2,000
Total SSLW:
866,000-
Waste Structures
Dlslgnated
Observed
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date
Freeboard
Freeboard
Waste Pond
WP1
19.00i
24.00

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas.-E Porter Facility Number:
130001
Inspection Date: 09/29/16 Inpsection'type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Aischaraes & Stream Imdacts
Yea No
Na me
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
.
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
'El .
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of, the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑ .
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storavie & Treatment
Y" No Net Ne .
4. Is storagecapacity less than adequate?
❑ -M
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e.1 large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the•permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) -
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aoolicatlon
Yes
No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
,
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
�..❑
.
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
....•:.
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?..
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

e
Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility : Thomas E Porter— Facility Number..
13D001
inspection Date: ' 09/29/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection <Reason for Visit:
Routine
Yes No Na No
Waste AnpllcaMon
Fescue (HaY, Pasture)
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2;
n�afr,a (Hey)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
,
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type.4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑ ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ N❑
❑
determination?
❑ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
'
❑ ❑
❑
Records and_Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Yes 'No Na No
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑
Wup?
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑ '
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑ '
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑....
t
page:
' ._ 4

Y
r,
Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas E Porter Facility Number:
1300011
Inspection Date: 09/29/16 Inspection type:. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit
Routine
Regords and Pocuments
Yn
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 Cl
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
00
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
[IN
[]
❑
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous foss assessment (PLAT) certification?
1111
❑
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewertinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yea
❑0❑❑
No Na Na
❑
M ❑
❑
❑
M ❑
❑
❑
MCI
❑
El
[1,0110
❑■❑❑
❑
ME]
❑
page: 6

Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Type of visit: 09 Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine' O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 93MM Arrival Time: a Departure Time: County:(:24 °URegion:' ` `(_-)
Farm Name: f 1, Owner Email:
Owner Name: G , i yr- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:7W I:f-- A ) �-!/\j
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: ( 6
Certification Number:
Longitude:
JEFDesDesignSwine city Pop.
Wet Pouitry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
EAtdffer to Finish
D . Poult ,
Design
Ca aci
Current
P,o P.
Da' Heifer
Farrow to Wean
arrow to Feeder
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
- - Boars-, ---- - - -- - _
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
__,Beef
Brood Cow_
- ---
- -
Li—ot-her I 10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ Nojg;LA-❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Ye❑
VN'o
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Y
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than -from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 ' 21412011 Continued

Facifi Number: -
Date of Inspection:
4. Is storage capacity?(
plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2
rA/ Identifier:
JP1017 Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 3 Structure 4
ie structures observed?
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
[:]Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No C .JJM D NE
Structure S Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YeKE� ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance.or-improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes rEpo 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manurc/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Qqtside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): OV-11 -
13. Soil Type(s): Q
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? J
/ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑yes
No ❑ NA
❑_NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
Yes
No NA
❑ NE
ftuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Y NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ec ists Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease AgreementsZaste*�.E3Veather
21. Doe record keeping need improvement? If yes, check ppropriate box below. - ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application eekly Freeboard WasteAnalysisTon�ly
of alysis Code
ainfall tocking ❑ C�Yield Minute Inspections and 1" Rainfall Inspec 'ons' Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued -

o
]FacilityNumber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Ye o ❑ N ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual'sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
5��
List structure(s) and date of fast survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o N ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT') certification? ❑ Y A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facil' roperly dispose of d animals with 24 hours and/or document Yes NA ONE
and report mortality rates that were higher nonma ?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. \
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes o ❑ NA [ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoontstorage Pond ❑ Other:
Were the CAWMP?
Yes
NA
NE
32. any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of permit or
❑
❑
❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same, agency? _ _ �_ _.__
__.❑ _ �❑
NA
❑ NE
Gents (refer to question.#): Ex61ain any::YES answers
rawings of facility to. bettex:eiplain.situations (use adi
CC3�3
oq o . �ct /�7 3gym,p"�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Any.'additiopal recommendations or any other't
pages as necessary).,:.` , ••, } ::;
ZK -I �t� ­-
G� t - I k-v
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3
21412011

Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ��� Departure Time: oil ` County:C . itRegion:
Farm Name --mat 1� ► "Ci� �l-�' Owner Email:'
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Opera
Back-up Opera
L�
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
CC }r Integrator:
Certification Number:
E�=CertiflcationNumberc��i�ll
0
Latitude: Longitude:
Design` ' Curreist'� Design. Current Design ,Current
Swine Capacity Pap Wet Poultry Capacity Pop Cattle, Capacity > Pap 4
Wean to Finish La er
' Wean to Feeder Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
F ow to Wean Design ; Current- a.
4
ow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
:Other
D , -Pouf Capacity.. Pop.
Layers
_
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts �,�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yeti! o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El structure [I Application Field ❑ Other:
��
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [] No A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yeo ❑ N NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes `NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
1
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facill Number: jDate of Inspection:
j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No A
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
V.1pdJer
Structure 5 Structure 6
tifier:.
way?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
4tothegrity
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate th of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes o NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[:]Yes NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t rest, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ]o ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑• Yes rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes [] NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ApiRlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Ye No ❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [,] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evide cc of Wind Drift ❑ Ap ' ation Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): �. ��iIt
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes [_ o ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes rEl NA
r] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility•fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
hecklistsLi Design Lj Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. re
s No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Appllii ion �ly Freeboard �te Analysis oil Analysis rans s ❑ Weather Code
[&sinfail' j�f Stockin Crop Yield [�] 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspec ons Sludge Survey
�.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [] Yest!KNo [DNA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 21412011 Continued
��� M

., _
FacilityNumber: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes N ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check �❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher an�f` normal`?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of ernSr&jg&juUations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-app ation)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yess
❑ Yes�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
I NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA {] NE
❑ Yes EEMo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any Additional., recommendations or any other,comments.
Use drawings of facility, to better explain situations (use additional pakes as necessary).._
� ► � v�� z B
0-2
M
ReviewerlInspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

13-01
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Porter Farm
Thomas Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road
Concord NC 28025
03-23-2005
This plan has been developed by:
Daniel McClellan
Cabarrus SWCD
715 Cabarrus Ave W
Concord, NC 28027
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste. management that are included with
this plan. I
-,�-os
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:� n
Technical Specialist ignature Date
_ - _ - - - - _ - 464022 D_ ^ ' - - _ _atabase Version 3.1 D- - _ _ _ - - Date Printed; 03-23-2005 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED / DENR 1 DWQ
AQUIFFR'PPnTF(',T1nN SECTION
MAR 16 2009

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s)-
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U3
Test waste generated 7,046,600 galslyear by a 2,200 animal Swine
Farrowing Weanling Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
store a ca acities of p2proximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
12686
Incorporated
21787
Injected
23994
Irrigated
13790
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied'(lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit(lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
d3,790
16008
-2,218
8,180,025
-1,133,425
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S mesas standard source, U means user def-med source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source
464022 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-23-2005 Source Page 1 of I

Narrative
Waste Utilization-- Use agricultural waste or other waste on Iand in an environmentally acceptable
manner. Refer to waste sample and soil sample results for applying waste.
-----------------------------,----------------,-------------- -- --- - ---
464022 Database Vernon 3.1 Date Printed: 03-23-2005 -- Narrative Page 1 -of 1

-1
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the
Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass forthe crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Airs
Plat
Reim g
�
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
al
RanTract
0lQbs1e as/acre)
Applied
{Ibs(aam)
950
3
10.3C
6.44
Medium
NIA
Csuldston
Fescue Pasture
*5.6 Tons
9
NIA
950 1
1 4
1.801
1.5
Medium
N/A
Goldston
Fescue Pasture
3.4 To
5
NIA
950
5
15.5
13.3
Medium
NIA
Goldston
Fescue Pasture
*5.6 Ton
9
NIA
950
6
17.
14.2
Low
NIA
Kirksey
Fescue Pasherc
*8.0 Ton
13
N/A
950
7
4
3.1
Low
NIA
Badin
Fescue Pasture
*7.8 To
12
NIA
950
8
I.1
I.
Low
NIA
Badin
Fracuc Pasture
07.8 Toa
12
NIA
950
9A
2.2
2.
Low
NIA
Badin
Fescue Pasture
*7.8 To
12
NIA
950
913
0.
0.
Low
NIA
Kadin
Fescue Pasture
3.9 TO
6
NIA
968
2
57.
40.51
Low
NIA
Gea viuc
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Ta
8
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 110.40 83.10
mNq+f
4 �� tiy�iw f [- �r
..sa'il�lyt��5.,'''P018lt�iQl.dCli1TJTeC�IIICQ�C►flidQltCC
_'" �H�M
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned,
>_ 2 &
soluble nutrient leaching below the
<= l0
root Done.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zon&
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency'should be
> 10
considered Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328� Long-TermNo-Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffets (391).
�3.7ia
. Jack
f.T`fndPx
Rating
add
—1 Management Reconunendahon �r
...: :..�
•a.. u.e%n"3�w= :.era �
.:._ -..f� o-....,.Ei-..;, � ..:.::." n..": y _ ,.
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed, N based application
25 = 50
Medium
No adjustment needed, N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
464022 Database version 3.1 Date Printed 3232005
PCs Page 1 or I
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below sununarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of .
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements;_
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by inanure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity ofsolid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. 'A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensule'that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Some
ED
soil Series
Total
Aces
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Apptie
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Raq'd
pbs/A)
COM I
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
App6c,
Maw
Manua:
PA
Nuuient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
MmureA
ppffcd
(acre)
solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Mariure
Apples
(Field)
Nf
Ni
IY
N
I00a
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
i tons
950
3
U3
t'3oldston
10.30
6.44
Fescue Pasture
05.6
811-7/31
0208
0
0
brig.
20S
106-2
0.00
684.51
0.00
950
4
U3
Goldstion
I.80
L,50
Fescue Pasture
3.4 Tons
8/1-7131
1 0128
0
1 0
IMS
128
65.41
0.00
98.11
0.001
950
5
U3
Goldston
15.50
13.39
Fescue Pasture
"5.6
8/1-7/31
•208
0
0
IiTig.
208
106.29
_ 0.00
1,423.23
0.
950
6
U3
Kirlrsey
17.00
14.26
Fescue Pasture
08.0
8/1-7131
0260
0
0
brig
132.86
0.00
1,894.63
0.
950
7
U3
Badin
4.20
3.10
Fescue Pasture
•7.8
8/1-7/31
'254
0
a
brig.
254
129.801.
D.00
402.3
.0.
950
8
U3
Bedin
1.10
1.00
Fescue Pasture
•7.8
9/1-713 t
0254
0
0
brig.
254
129.90
O.GC
129.8
0.
950
9A
U3
Badin
2-20
2.00
Fescue Pasture
•7.8
8/1-7131
•254
0
0
Irrig.
254
129.
' 0.00
25939
0.00
950
9B
U3
Badin
0.90
0.90
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
811-7131
127
0
0
Irrig.
127
64.90
0.00
58.41
0.00
968
2
U3
Georgevillo
=57.40
40.51
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
k 56
0
0
Inig,
156
3,229.37
0.G
Total Applied,
1000 gallons
8,180.03
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
7,046.60
i "
MOM
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,133.43
f IVIR
Total Applied, tons
`= r"-1_altx
0.00
Total Produced, tons
ca
0.
Bntance, tons
WO
0,
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned 2. Symbol* means user entered data.
464022 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/23/2005 WUT Page 1 of 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hots that may be applied to each Feld selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one.application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(incheAour)
Application Amount
(inches)
950
3
Goldston
*0.36
1.0
950
4
Goldston
$0.36
1.0
950
5
Goldston
*0.36
1.0
950
6
Kirksey
*0.36
1.0
950
7
Badin
*0.36
1.0
950
•8
Radin
*0.36
1.0
950
9A
Badin
*0.36
1.0
950
9B
Badin
*0.36
1.0
968
2
Georgeville
*0.36
1.0
464022 Database Version 3.1 ' Date Printed 3/23/2005 IAF Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

_`
The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the claps to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in afield. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
I
N
(IbslA)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(WA)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
950
3
Req'd Nutrients
•208
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Aons App.
Period
6.44
8/1-7/31
Supplied By
RP7fii:
,,Oj,
Q
x s� z
4wrI" ;
';
R 5" r�
t .
7,s a"
V
p"'e fi.�t ,q
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Pert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Goldston
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
hate
*5.6 Tons
10-22-04
Manure
2081
105
387
501
1
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
9 Ibs/ac.
Medium
BALANCE
0
105
387
50
1
1
0
0
Tract Field
4S0
4
Req'd Nutrients
*128
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acm App.
Period
1.50
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
'�
N e
n�ya
c'�r ��"
J'%�Y`�X ..,'.'�
4 f °�'
aZS�?r..�t�fdiN'Wt
K
a
y yTx
CROp
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Goltwon
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
3A Tons
10-22-04
Manure
1281
64
238
31
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
5 lbs/oe.
Medium
BALANCE
0
64
238
31
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
950
5
Req'd Nutrients
*208
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
13.39
8/1-7/31
Supplied BY
"a
'./iC pry
.— ri'3^3
e}S+; f JW
,x;._, Y"r
�auf
`+
��
` ,
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commensal Fort.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Goldxtoa
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
*5.6 Tons
10-22-04
Manure
208
105
387
50
1
1
0
0
P Removal
I Ruling
9 ars/ae.
Medium
BALANCE
0
105
387
50
I
1
0
0
Tract
Field
950
6
Req'd Nutrients
*260
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
14.26
8/1-7/31
Supplied
,,Ir.
�� 1�-
1101W,
��
I-
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Stllrter
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
COnunercial Fart.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Kirksey
Residual
0
0
0
0:
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
*8.0 Tons 1
10-22-04 .
Manure
2601
131
484
621
1
1
0
0
P Removal
I Ratiag
13 ibs/ac.
w
$ALANCE 1
01
1311
4841
621
11
1
0
0
464022 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/23/2005 NMR Page I of 2

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
Obs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
950
7
Req'd Nutrients
*254
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
A .Period
itP
3.10
8/1-7 1
/3
lttxl B y
`
"� s' _
.3?
y
a. ' . �
tie ?
• r
ft, � .'
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
D
0-
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Samplc
Date
*7.8 Tons
10-22.04
Manure
254
128
473
61
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
1216s/ac.
w
BALANCE
0
128
473
61
1
1
0
0
Tract
I Field
950
8
Req'd Nutrients
*254
150
150
10
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
1.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:WFU
i'"•Y''3
J'
Vie-•
t
Ffya'•�:tx c.
#rr-
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
pate
*7.8 Tons
12-22-04
Manure
254
128
473
61
1
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
1216slac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-22
323
61
1
1
0
0
Tract
Field
950
9A
Req'd Nutrients
*254
150
150
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
2.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By.AWM
09
PRM
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
*7.8 Tons
12-22-04
Manure
.254
128
473
61
I
1
0
0
P Ramova] Rating
12lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
22
323
bl
1
1
0
R
Tract Field •
950
9B
Req'd Nutrients
127
ISO
150
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
0.90
8/1-7131
Supplied BY
��r � :
.:
ts.
._ _ r
.... .:....:..
cry..
-tic '--5.
.3,-e ..r_...
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fart.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Badin
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
Oi
0
ple Date
3.9 Tons
12-22-M
Manure
127
64
237
30
0
1
0
0
l Rating
6 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
-86
87
30
0
1
0
0
P
Field
968
2
Req'd Nutricnts
156
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p. Perio&I
40.51
9/1-7/31
Supplied By.
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Geervvilic
Rcsiduall
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.8 Tons
10-22-04
Manure
I56
7$
291
37
0
I
01
0
PRarwovallRatingl
8 Ibs/ac.
w
BALANCE 1
01
7$
291
37
0
1
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means -user entered data
464022 Database Version 33 Date Printed:' 3/2312005
NMR Page 2 of 2

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should betaken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated bydividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
Sy adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Valuesit Test
Tenet
Field
Crop
pH
lame Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Rocornn=dation
950
3
Fescue Pasture
6.4
0.0
294
None
382
None
950
4
Fescue Pastum
6.1
0.0
132
Nona
329
Nona
950
5
Fescue Pasture
6.0
0.0
232
None
455
None
930
6
Fescue Pasture
6.4
0.0
378
None
488
None
950
7
Fescue Pasture
6.3
0.0
295
None
390
None
950
9
Fescue Pasture
.0
0.0
0
None
o
None
950
9A
Fescue Pasture
.0
0.0
0
None
p
None
950
98
Fescue Paslura
.0
0.0
0
None
1 0
None
969
2
1 Fescue Pnsture
6.1
0 11
129
None
1 203
1 Nona
------ -- - ------------------------------------------------------
464022 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 03-23-2005 STV Pa 1 of t

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effiuent,application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gavac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
-15 Years Accumulation'
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
ISO
13.16
65.19
130.38
195.57
Hay 6 ton 1ZY.E.
300
26.32
32.59
65.19
97.78
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
61.12
122.23
183.35
------------------------------------------------------------- ---
464022 Database version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-23-2005 Sludge Page I of I

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacityshould be greaterthan or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates thatthe plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storatxe Canacitv
Source Name Test
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
StartDate 9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
170
1
2
163
1
3
174
1
4.
180
i
5
180
I
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
I0
180
1
11
171
1
12
161
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
464022 _ Y r ^` _ _
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-23-2005 Capacity Page1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must.be documentation in -the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 -- Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
464022 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/23/2005 Specification Papte ]

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wastetnutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
- _ -464022 ^' ' {' Database Version'3.1 ^ _ ` - - _ _ _ - - Date Printed: 3/23/2005 T �' ' _ Specification Pate 2 --

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
464022 Daubase Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/23/2005 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when.
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a,manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
r Y r -
464022 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/23/2005 Specification PaRe 4

Crop Notes
Fescue. Piedmont
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tail fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 201b/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 601b/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%' for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 7, 8, 9A, 9B
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with. clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper Iegume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The folIowing crop note applies to field(s): 3, 4, 5
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted -
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegmss. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20'and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
464022 - - - - - -"- _ _ _
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-23-2005 Crop Note Page 1 of I

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
PO Box 796
Salemburg, NC 28385
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 1, 2009
Dee Freeman
I�! OCT - s zoos
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS130001
Porter Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cabarrus County
In accordance with your requests for renewal and change of ownership, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Thomas E. Porter, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Porter Farms, located in Cabarrus County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: 2000 Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS130001 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keening and monitoring conditions in this permit. _ Record keeping form_ s are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record ke=ina forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Ra fth, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location; 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleio, North Carolina 27604 ne
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 oil ffi Carolliina
Internet: www.nanratemuality.org �/��urQf�i�
An Equal Opporlunity 1 Affirmalin Action Employer

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15AiNCACC'2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements; or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 111.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website - at:
www.erh.noaa..eov/er/gsli/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Cabarrus County Health Department
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS130001)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC

,Bealle, James
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sent with Genius Scan for iOS.
ltttp: lbit.ly/download-genius-scan
Sent from my Wad
Tommy Porter <[e-mail]>
Monday, September 29, 2014 9:28 AM
Bealle, James
[e-mail]
[Start] 2014-09-28 22:42
2014-09-28 22-42.pdf

md:� in
lg.*40-
.4D.Af�
f% C'ning
21 Rl N% VEF sD-.A, Y
E%-cran,g
Junc Mav
2014
22THt'kSDAY
23FRID,AY
E-scning
24S AT U RDAY 25 suNDAY
IL
Evening
lk

0
a. so Alit
w2sn4
WMurn Date
Paycheok 4712 OE/71/2014 Boon B Blai
TOTAL
Check
TOTAL
Cheek
TOTAL
Check
TOTAL
Bill Prat -Cho"
BNt
TOTAL
---��
Check
TOTAL
��
TOTAL
4713 KII/2914 Cash
PorEer Farms, Inc.
1+larrre
r
'
Check Detail
May21-31,2614
twn Account
Paid Amount
or+Qi�•i Anfou:st
checking
40'63
Payroll F.vemes
.580.00
580.00
-72.00
Payroll LisbllWas
72.00
35.96
Payroll Expenses
•35.95
135.98
Payroll Usb6hiss
35.96
45'96
Payroll Llablut1es
35.90
8.41
Payroll F,xpensa
-8.41
43,41
Payroll Liabilities
8.41
.8.41
Payroll Llabilltias
8.41
45.00
Payroll LJabNitles
25.00
2.78
Payroll FVenaes
-2.78
-2.78
Payroll Usisibea
2.78
436.63
checidng
a,BOO.oc
Equ0nent Rental
�.r�Q.00
3,500.00
-3.500.00
3-NO-00
4714
98f1A/2014
Capsrrus Courft
chscOV
- MOO
Pmfessiomi Fan
-160.00
180.00
-180.00
180.00
4718
0&2V=4
Jared Porter
Chile"
-21MOO
Relrnbume sysassa
-2,600.00
2.6W.00
-2,000.00
2,800.00
4716
08/t7J20/4
Crop Production...
checldnp
-1-79LOO
06f1212014
Fedillxers
4,T96.00
1,79&00
.1.796.00
1,786.00
4717
08/21/2014
NC Oepertrerant of..
ctrscklrrp
4&00
rollsasicnal Faes
-16.00
16.00
-MOD
MOD
4719
08fi8lI014
EsrgWm L Tyede
ched*q
a4'r.a4
Payroll Expenses
aR00
270.00
Payroll Elrpeates
.16.74
1&74
Psyr+DA Llamb"
16.74
-W74
Payroll L}st811UM
16.74
-10.74
PeyroN EAmmee
-&92
3.92
Paymu LhbM*
3,22
-3.92
Palma Lis«btiltiee
3.02
A92
Peyror Evans"
AM
1.02
Peyrolt Lie ADO
1.02
-1.62
Payroll Llehlir n
2.00
-2.00
ptyroll Expent 11
-1.30
1.30
Psy" Latin
1.30
-1.30
447.24
W^ 247.34
PW 3

5/21/2014
NC Depot nwa of Ag*ubm —16.00
Sbehm and OQMODO-P" -a ---------- — ---
NC De putnwd of Aoftftffe
1040 Meal SGFWM C4Kftr
RMOO, MC 27MG 1040
NC DepwWwd of AWbA" swinepoultry swrq* 52112014 16.00
16-00
NC Depeftwd of AgricuMm owme poultryUMPIS 602112014 16.00
WOO-%

_-
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number _ � - r0-� O Dlvisibn of Sell and, Wat0 Conservation t _
Q Other Agency 1"
Type of Visit: 49 Compliance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit-.' O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
�W �r IIII��IP��11 YIIY_�I11 Ili 1 A• �
Date of Visit: �Arrival Time: a Departure Time: =$ County: Region: *4
��l 1 � _ —
Farm Name: � r Owner Email:
Owner Name: �,� �°�i Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
_ -Design "Current
Design
Current
Design Current 1
Swine Capacity. Pop. ,
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity - Pop.
Wean to Finish
I JLayer
Dairy
Cow
Discharges and Stream Ima_acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ' ❑ NA [] NE
a
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/1011 Continued

Facility Numbeq - - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection &TYestment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes Vo NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Y ��_o 0 NA ONE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �a ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack.adequate markets as required by the permit? 0 Yes �to ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,•dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes�g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes �NoNA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN - ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. C] Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application utside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C,
13. Soil Type(s):�--
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes go 0 NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Ip ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Ye o . ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ps ease greemen s ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, eck the appropriate box below, es ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
2rifiall
pplicationeekly Freeboar aste Analysis Soil Analysis to rans ers eather Code king ❑ Cr ieid [:]I e Inspections nthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail'to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No <NMNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 21412011 Continued
*1
J

Facili Number: IDate of Ins ee' don: ,a l
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [DNA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec y1 ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
t
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
[] Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes jrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Yegc::M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �3vo 0 NA ❑ NE
es ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other.
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [:]Yes NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
r.
Use drawinEs of facility to better explain situations (use additional panes as necessary).
LN
2)S2�q:71 3
7-713r---
V\'YC
�p :
Tf
b® C
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date;
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Faciiity Number
Division of Water Quality
©- - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency _s • .
type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
teason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:. Arrival Time: 3+c � Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: owner' Email:
Owner Owner Name:"' J �� 1 �r 1Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
111
1.0
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
= Design. Current Design Current Design Current
Swine' Capacity Pop, Wet Poultry . Capaclty` .Pop. Cattle_` Capacity° Pop.-
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
F eder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gifts
Boars
Other
Other
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
Layer
Non -La er
n PClan r­�Pnt
Dry Poult
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
DaiLy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
�1A
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
;!5�VA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ o
A
❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
1
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment"
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 1 - o1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No �VA ❑ NE
.Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ; ��—
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inT
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, e
iiy of any of the structures observed?
}
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure. plan?
❑ Yes��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �<No ❑ NA [] NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;go
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 12Aio ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �T0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of�Wind
yDrift ❑ App ' ation Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): _C"vp' . C
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
4S:0AM Gg(qJ'�,.
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes :EgNo
❑ Yes bio
❑ Yes DKNO
❑ Yes
I—! Yes >_�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[] NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
es�gn Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. D es record keeping need im ovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ NA ❑ NE
W " Applicati n 1�4�eekly Freeboard�Minutc
aste Analysis oil Analysisgi�as�teTmnsfers alher Code
ainfall Stocking ❑ C Yield ❑ Inspections ❑hly and I" Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No�NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes , o
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

_--,.' clli Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec , Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss asses Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issu
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes IQo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergenc si ions as required by the
Yefso
❑ NA
[3NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains'exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Ye❑
NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storagc Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes 1i0
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes to
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
0
r, 01*�)]
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

7
r'
Division of Water Quality �• -�
Facility Number Q 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I L5 t Arrival Time: Departure Time: F r :;­OCounty:
Farm Name: __. ' WN1_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility, Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative::-�{ -��,r
Certified Operator: VIaS r i �"
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
,Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Region: "` i _0
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:(, -7
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 0 I ❑ Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ ' 0 "
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
DEX Cow'
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stockei
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o [I NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ N><7NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural fi•eeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 cture 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 4t� ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes )!�40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑'Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ��—� 1 a siv�`) -
13. Soil type(s) 1�° C 7�, v
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes )21�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ElNE
❑ Yes, o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
rL4.'& cry? Qj A�l d' \\
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued
W

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yest❑NA
ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ YesEl NA
[INE
the appropirate box.
gn Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Y ❑ NA
❑ NE
�aste Application �eekly Freeboard Analysis oil Anal sis Waste Transfers Annual Certification
Rainfall Stocking rop Yield 20 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0<eather
Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes"�ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No '15NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes)go ❑ NA
❑ NE
��'�
26. Did the facility fait to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
[I NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ETKo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higan normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
�,
❑ Yes j,o ❑ NA
ElNE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
�
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of . ns as required by
❑ Yes ) No ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (W discharge, freeboard problems, ove�plication)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

®-Divislon'orwater Quality ,
Faciiity.Number. j 3 T 0�Divislon,of Soll.and Water Conservation r
0 Other Agency 1
Type of Visit (9 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Dote of Visit: i t i Arrival Time: �a :Qri � Dep�a(r�ture Time: � t �`�' County: � NS Region: V 1�
Farm Name: C) V v_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: -
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: d1�S ` Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
10 Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ tder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 0 d Q Longitude: •❑ °==
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Murkey Puults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: L\_1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ YeSA o — El NA Cl NE
❑ Yes . ❑ No ElNE
El Yes' ElNo OtA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE,
❑ Yes jD NA ❑ NE
❑ YesV�ro
❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes—'5 — NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes ❑ No� ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): '
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment l threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N4LIro ❑ NA ❑ NE
t
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apalication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 I . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incoiporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application utside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination' ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes &M ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
SCommeiits'(refer to question #): Eplairt sink YES•answers"and/or any irecvmmendations or any utiter commen#s.
Use',dritWin s'ot`faci# to,better.,ex Lain situations.' use additional, a es as necesea }
lI tY P ( g .
P
4
It
t L S [ Jtrfl dye S
ReviewerAnspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
r
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ yestEJ
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ W aps e r
21. Does r rd keeping need improvem t? If yes, check th appropriate box below. ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
Waste Application eekly F and Was alysis oil Analysis Waste Transfers �An�ntuification
ainfall ❑ ocking rop Yield 20 Minute Inspections n� onthly and I" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain'rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1A ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o El NA El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes a El NA ❑'NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes ❑ NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? El yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of
�ea thin 24 hours and/or document ❑ yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ yes CNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer as required by ❑ Yes VEOI
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Ye ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes❑ NE
.., - .
Additional Comments and/or Drawings -.': u F ,''
6
4
1 12128104

Division of Water Quality
facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation `
O Other Agency
fype of Visit Op Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
eason for Visit *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: Countv: �� Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
,Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: T Title: _
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: woi► " T_
Back-up Operator:_
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o = ' Longitude: = ° = ' = "
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
arrow to Wean -Z -YO 2DtD
Eff—Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ a er
❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
Nc
Pu
Tu
Design Current
Capacity Population.
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
El
-Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
• d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
i
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes • ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
IM8104 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
tk>
.�
Waste Collection &c Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes%o El NA ❑ NE
h v
�a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
i llway?:
Designed Freeboar
Observed freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(icl large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen al threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any ofthe structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;[0:3 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application�-O�utsii e of Area
12. Crop type(s) fie. C4,0,� . `tts_
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a
fo question #)i
_ n situations. (rise additional
�ssary)
i y „•
ww•
Reviewer/Inspector Name `' �§ A r . ,il Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
N El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
E
12128104 Continued

�4f
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available2 If yes, check El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ec is s ign Maps they �.�,
2l , Does record keeping need improve;pent? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes L Vo A El NE
J2<aaste Application eekly Freeboard a-s'te Analysis Soil Analysis aste Transfers/ ❑ Annua Certification
❑ tall ❑ eking ❑ C Yield _0 Minute Inspections ❑ thly and I" Rain inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes--154.,;o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes, fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 5eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ElNA ElNE
Other Issues 3�<
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes-Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes XVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were hig an normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 12C ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office ofemer enc situations as required by ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, o app icatton)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes_i�do ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional C6inmei nts andlar, Drarritigs:
12128104

.0
' bealle, James
From: Daniel McClellan [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 5:04 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Porter Mutua Fields
Attachments: Porter RYE Mutua.pdf
Mr. Bealle,
Porter Farm maintained records for RYE on his Mutua grass fields for 5 years and we took and average of the best 3
years to determine the Rye for Mutua since the state used the RYE of Fescue. Fields 3,5,6,7,8,9A were all in mutual grass
and have RYE records. I have attached the sheet that the records were determined on. on the WUP I may should have
used rescue grass rather than fescue for the crop type since mutua isn't on as a crop selection. If you need anymore info
let me know.
Daniel McClellan
Cabarrus Soil and Water Conservation
DISCLAIMER:
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AMENDMENT
Producer.
Porter Farms
County: ;Cabarrus
Address:
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road South
Facility Number: 13-0001
Concord, NC 28025
Permit Number. JAWS130001
Field Acres
Actual Yield By Year (Tons)
Average 5
Average
Field Number
Expected(!on s RYE
Total Field Acres
Wettable Acres
Expected Yield
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002 "*
Year
Yield
High 3
Yield
3
5.6
10.30
6.44
36.50
36AO
37.05
37.05
37.75
13.00
32.25
j 37.28
5
5.6
15.50
13.39
74.98
75.40
76.05
75.40
74.10
36.40
67.47
1 75.61
6
8.0
17.00
14.26
114.08
114.40
115.70
; 113.75
113.75
52.00
101.92
i 114.61
7
7.8
4.20
1 3.10
24.18
24.70
24.05 25.35
25.35
13.00
2-2,49
; 25.13
8
7.8
1.10
1.00
7.80
7.80
7.80 ; 8.45
j 6.50
2.60
5.63
8.01
9A
7.8
2.20
2.00
15.60
18.20
j 15.60 17.55
14.95
7.80
14.82
17.11
NOTES:
I
Realistic Yields Expectations (RYE) for Fescue and Matua grass mixture which are used in the Waste Utilization Plan are higher than established USDA-NRCS standard RYE
for this crop and soil type. Porter Farms have maintained records of actual yields for each field. The average yield for the highest 3 years is higher than the expected RYE. For
this waste utilization plan, the expected yield will continued to be used. "During calendar year 2002, a severe drought affected the yields.
Porter Farms will continue to maintain records of actual yields of the Fescue and Matua grass mixture for waste application fields. If the actual
yields are less than the listed RYE for (three out of the five years), the RYE for that field and the waste application rate will be adjusted. The
adjusted rates will be based on actual yields.
Signature of Facility Owner:
- I�
Thomas E. Parw. Jr.
Date I t
Signature of Technicial Specialist:�,t.,
I
Watthevn . USDA-NRCs
Data f
I l
I
t
F
j
I 1
I
Porter Farms 1 of 1 217103

Type of Visit QD Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ®Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access '
Date of Visit: ® `Arrival Tiene: =✓l Departure Time: drx County;
Fat•111 1�71111C: `� C " `"r� �p ��� V�IiCI L', 11Ailli.
Owner Name: °T YvV Phone: _
Region:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: 6 Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: E] e Longitude: 0 ° F—T "
DesignCurrent I.
Design. Current s t Destgn Current
Swine ' `"' Capacity: 1'optilation Wet -Poultry ;,;Capacity Po rulation 4Cattlei '; , Y
Capacity Population,.,
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
eeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Oilts
❑
Boars
❑ Layer
❑ Non-Layet
a
Dry Poultry �nx
❑ Layers {
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
Other,"'
❑ 'l'urke
❑ Other ❑Other
rI
Puult .
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dai Heifej
❑
D Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
' a
Number of 5trui
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that.reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
a
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No <6A ❑ NE
[]Yes ❑ Nd- KA. ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o El NA ElNE
ClYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:---.`'�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): a7
Observed Freeboard,(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
.. through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes � o" ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1@1C ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes CONA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? `'���\
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is. there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o,
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Cro Window El Evidence of Wind Drifi ❑ A lication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) T,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes o
ElNA ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes XO
❑ NA ❑ NE
'�*a1 �t 'tea"8is s�:, s k`�� g'�
C° nts (efer to question #)tA Expla anygE answers!autl/or' ny comet fans ar anCher. otnments:
C]se.tlrawings o�f�faclility tt►}better• explya�iyn esitupatl�ons: (use,addiyt)ion_altpag�essias n5etces�s�ayry): h
C(F 4. �'�{�,..PCc'Ti'�k�T+Y S�F`�?'-4w�'is�° � Zirixn�l�-a�ck��/�' +NL'.43.�5h��_
O-Zo
16'
bid
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
I2128104
Continued

'i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Pen -nit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components o he CAWMP re ily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA El
the approprrate box. ❑ P ❑
ecklists esign aps er
21. Does rec rd keeping nee improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
4 Yi1Jll: 11tl tJll LilLkWl `rr ccniy CCCOOZUG ' 4 - e Anaiy'si5 ri oJii n�iuiy.�ia r1 ` Slls i C1cC5 t.Uktudl %r C1kj lilaAtiuli
��
fLJ Rainfall �ocking ❑ C field CCCCute Inspections and 1" Rain Inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes]J' ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑`No�RVA
❑ NE
❑ Yes' Vo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NQPNE4
ElYes Rio
[IN
❑ Yes ❑ No
�fA ❑ NE
❑ Yes all o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes &o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes t�NA
ElNE
ElYes❑
NA
❑ NE
Adesditior ' -.mment•._sandLorDrawin, r ,gs,.�
W ` + '' -4s 1 •s y. -ij-' '� l a V a J , c's. {� n A l;i M t ^;N+Srn j3
nal Co�
12128104

r
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 130001 Facility Status: Aplive Permit: AWS130001 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Cabarrus Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09/26/2008 Entry Time:12!30 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Porter Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas E Porter Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 4455 Mt Pleasant Rd S _ Concord NC 280257659
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator: Cargill
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°21'07" Longitude: 80°26'40"
Five miles south of Mt. Pleasent on Mt. Pleasant Rd. (SR 1006). Farm is on the left across from the intersection with Bost Cut Off Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas E Porter Operator Certification Number: 17560
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Thomas E. Porter Phone: [phone]
-On-site representative Thomas E. Porter Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Jame ealle Phone: [phone]
Ex.12,
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(
k I
Inspection Summary:
06/16/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.3 Lbs/1000 Gallons
D1/24/08 > Soil Analysis
Jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas E.Porter Facility Number: 130001 1
Inspection Date: 09/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,000 2,085
- ---- ----- - --_ - - — - - - ... _ -- - - Total Design Capacity:_ _... —---'2,000---- -
Total SSLW: 866,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WP1 T
19100 39.00 I --- __
Page: 2

Permit: AVVS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 09/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Innacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
0
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
rl
Application Field
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
0
■
0
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (it yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
0
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
■
0
0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
0
■
0
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that, are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0
■
0
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
■
0
0
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
n
0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
■
0
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0
■
0
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0
■
0
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
Q
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWS130001 Owner- Facility: Thomas E Porter
Inspection Date: 09/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 130001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
fl
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
In
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Sail Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
. ■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
In
0
Page: 4
r

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas f Porter
Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 0912612008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? DODO
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
rl
Weekly Freeboard?
rl
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
f-I
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n ■' n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 0 0 ■ 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
0
D
■
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
D
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
fl
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
2& Were an additional roblems noted which cause non-comP liance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
Y P
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 ■ n ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ Q ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS130001 Owner -Facility: Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001 ►
Inspection Date: 09/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
34, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? n ■ Do
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 ■ El 0.
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ■ ❑ Q
Page: 6
�� r

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 130001 Facility Status: Activ2. Permit: AWS130041 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: GomplmanQg Inspectioa Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Cabarrus �- Region: Mgoresville
Date of Visit: Q5/1612007 Entry Time:03-00 PM Exit Time: 04-QO PM Incident #:
Farm Name: PPo ter E rm�. Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas E Porter
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 4455 Mt Pleasant Rd S _ _ Concord NC 280257659
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant
Location of Farm:
Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: 35°21'07" _ — Longitude: 80°26'40"
Five miles south of Mt. Pleasent on Mt. Pleasant Rd. (SR 1006). Farm is on the left across from the intersection with Bost Cut Off Rd
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas E Porter Operator Certification Number: 17560
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Thomas E. Porter Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Thomas E. Porter Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: 'vli ti i
Secondary Inspector(s):
�_)
Inspection Summary:
03/27/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.0 Lbs11000 Gallons
09/07/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.2 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/29/06 > Soil Analysis
lb
Page: 1

Permit: AVVS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas E Porter Facility Number; 130001
Inspection Date: 05/1612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,000 2,180
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 866,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WP1 19.00 40.00
Page: 2

i Permit: AWS130001 Owner • Facility: Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Cl
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
00.00
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
WOO
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? Q
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS130001 Owner -Facility: Thomas E Porter
Inspection Date: 05/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 130001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type_4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? Q ■ ❑ Cl
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. bid the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4
9

0
Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas E Porter Facility Number: 130001
Inspection Date: 0511612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ' ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? In
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fait to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS130001 Owner - Facility: Thomas E Porter
Facility Number: 130001
i
` t
r
Inspection Date: 05/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q m ❑ Q
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Q ■ Cl
■ Q D
Page: 6

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �p� Arrival Time: :,at7 Departure Time: C� County: Region
Farm Name: c�i ./-.. _/t!��,_.:. Owner Email: -
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: a% lrc Integrator:
r�
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o l ll Longitude: o ❑ l�
ref 7:,,� r � �L nr, yw f }Y ,l, is-,.v:�'., i
=, ' i' " e + t 5' y}--.," 5 Ff .�,. �s v v n t �*
CurrentDesign:..*. MCurrent t _ 4 Design .a; Current,`
Capacity Population ;Y k^Wet Foultry C pactty,'Fopulatlon Cattle h , a4 ,�'Capacity���Poptilatioti
v, ..
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy Cow
ElWean to Feeder ❑ Non La er h" El -Dairy Calf L'
_ ElFeeder to Finish z _ El Dairy Heifei.
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ D Cow
,
,���Dry Poultry, - �„'�<
El Farrow to Feeder " ❑ Non-Dai
❑ La ers
- ElFarrow to Finish :� < ❑ Beef Stockei;
❑ Nan -La ers f'
t ❑ Gilts 0-Beef Feeder fiY,
❑ Boars ❑Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
4•T ti"t f Y l� --Pc� "'w �. n 1t�.,. c�.rl;-'''.w `�.f�•o-r�^wi'� Ak ��'y
Other yap T�ay�� FrSi u:�
❑Tu
4
rkey Poults I
y ❑ Other v ❑ Other I INumber of Structures 1 ��
r .'4"fi. r t- :.��4...�'--�r . �.Y a,rk,. 4.. �:. .� , i .wi f_ 5..�. ,�y �... �,d� 1, ,d ., l� b +�"� x •�! .�; � � _ jh".k� +'7.;',sP,?
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
)&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
ElYes
ElNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify bWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — " Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
nim
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE`y
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 2,No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes .&No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 9No-
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes [rl�b
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes Q,,No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ap lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes y No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes f�] No
Cl NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of
Area
12. Crop type(s) 4—f. r, e , I
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes tM No
❑ NA [I NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes g] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑.Yes
Z.No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes E9 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 4!3.No
❑ NA ❑ NE
ReviewerAns ector Name c �Phone: p `
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� *� . J Date: 2 to
12128104 Continued
0

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Re;Juired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Other
❑Yes '�jNo ❑NA. ❑NE
❑ Yes 14No El NA ❑NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes k(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the -facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT).certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
NNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
,&'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
of No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes �DNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 9No
ElNA
ElNE
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road South
Concord NC 28025
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NC DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL_ RESOURCES Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
RECEIVED Division of Water Quality
090erll ,ko 4
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
M-GROUNDWATER SECTION
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS 130001
Porter Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cabarrus County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 10, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Thomas
E. Porter, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS 130001 which expires October 1, 2004,
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Porter Farms, located in Cabarrus County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 2000 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record kee in
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section —Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
< NorthCarolina
Phone; 919-733-3221 1 FAX: 919-71M5881 Internet: h2o.enr,state,nc.us Natmrjallff
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 60% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Cabarrus County Health Department
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS130001
APS Central Files

Type of Visit P Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit A Routine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ��] County: (,e ,4o'r 4 Region: A ')
Farm Name: POCZ try FAIL-tA Owner Email:
Owner Name: lrom C 5 vtlgrR _- _ n Phone:
Mailing Address: y y SS MI P11-ASrN E
A\
Physical Address: r
Facility Contact: ^ Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:-rk'm4� _ RQIr'r Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
�o
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
[--]Layer
❑ Non -La er
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
®
Farrow to Wean
v
14770
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Po Its
❑ Other
Longitude: = ° 0 ' 0
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: El
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

' -. - — �- H• F,.., �M.r�.. a .r. , '�,,; —. f.� ... ,....
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes BNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
identifier: L.- I wa
Spillway?: Y r -5
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes © No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes E1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 191 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
s 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes •® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12, Crop type(s) AA4k q Fc5["e
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination;
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
• Ree owe PS d- rAer,M A/)pr,qr r
'. WP.►I 0047 N<w pnRM, Rtci�:MRN
LeF{
Reviewer/Ins ector Name '''"'`
p rAy � � �. e���: � ::s:,MMRhone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: !i A-t4 Date: �L D. 6 - o S
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes R) No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropiiate box, ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? []Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑y No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addition' al.Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

t
a
Facility Number Date of Visit: 7- 33 ' Time:
O Not O erationa . O Below Threshold
I&Permitted O Certified [3Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
tn
FarmName: ........ [, Zi SJ.4iX........i atri M.f............ ............................................. I..... County:... . CAVL69 ..................................................
OwnerName:..Tbmsp ......................... ..1.1F�..M ............................................... - Phone No:......................................................................................
MailingAddress:............................................................._._............................................................................................... »........... ............................ ..........................
Facility Contact: .............. PQk.*M...... _....... ..... Title: ....... 0_&.11.AMX................................. Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ...................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
IRSwine []Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude • 4 «
r
DesigDl�"Currents'`' `Design Current' '" a °Design ` Curent-
Swine Ca aci ' „Po elation. " Poultry.<,.<t, s Ca "aci ° s P.o iilation:E ;Cattle ° .Ca""acityPopulatian
,4
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Farrow to Wean
p o
0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
i ❑ Other I
Tota1 Designs Opacity,,', C
c9€?, 9 o AI'.SE
_; °Number o€:Lagoons
u h
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
,:L000
p
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �X No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes JQ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes RI No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......... ... I ..... .............. ................................... .................. .................. ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes M No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or [] Yes Qj No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes No
elevation markings?
Waste AnDlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type / Atk,d Ae_,c t
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. 1s there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
1$. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ]a No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 2 No
6
=Comments (refer to questaon #) Explain any YESaaswecs andlor any recommendatzoasEoranyotber comments ean��s ,IT
;
'use drangs otfacility toibetterezplamsitpadoas{nse additional,pages.as:neery):' . [I Field Copy Q Final Notes 3 s
rAmm swoteeroA ds well K,�Pt .
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;1W
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 17' ;J 0 4/
12112103 Continued

A
1~acility Number: ,.
Date of Inspection FT--5T--A
Renuired Records & Document~
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[& No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iet WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[W No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Q1 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
26.
FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie1 discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
MNo
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
In No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
Cl No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Michael F
( ; 4J
Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Nalural Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 24, 2003
Mr. Tom Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Subject: Porter Farms, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWS 130001
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Porter:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water 0uafity
Coieen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quaiity
Mr. AIan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 23,
2003. Based on his observations, the records were found to be complete and the facility
appeared to be well operated and maintained.
Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
AM
1vCOENR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office. 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 877-623-6748 FAX [phone]

! 7rr,�, a i?i;;,
:`yt •w '_
Division of Water Quality
,
10 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Oak. of Visit: 07/23/2003 Time:
hacilit, Number 13 O1 !
Q Not Operational 0 Ilelotir Threshold
® Permitted ® Certifier! [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered I)atc 1.-ast Operated or .above Threshold: . __ ..........
Farm :Name: Ractex.Farms ............................... ..... County: Caba,rr-tts.............. ll'I1 Q......
Owner game: Thmnas-h,__.___-------- - --------•_-__ Phone :No:
Meiling Address: 445..1Ya1-.R1�asa�nik.iieaci. A.l�t� ..................................................... CQlns.vrll..t�.C............................. R ..............
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: ........ Phone No:
Onsite licprescntatiye:'>_OM�QRT�R_._._____•-------------------•____-- Intcgrator:C,argill--•-----------•---------.------_--..
Cet'titicd operator:jjjQxus.hr........................... jrVlrtet•................................................ Opermor Certit'icatinn \'rltilbel':l C11}.
Location of Farm:
Five miles south of Mt. Pleasent on Mt. Pleasant Rd. (SR 1006). Farm is on the left across from the intersection with Bost
Eut Off Rd.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse latitude F35 ` 21 07 L,on;;itudc 80 • 2b 40
Design Current.
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
JE1 Layer
I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
JCI Non -Layer
I Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
2000
1925
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
866,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Are ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes i8 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance than -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water ot'tlie State`? (li'ves, notify DWQ) [j Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in 1plhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system! (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & TI-eattilent
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 StRiCtUre Structure 0
Identitier:........................... ............ ............... .......................... ........................... ........................... ...........................
Freeboard ( inches): 15
neinarnr r'�»•+»•��•+

UJ/UJ/UA
Facility Number: 13-01
Date of Inspection 07/23/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Applicalion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? . ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
�i/nei+iKfN
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Matua
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Cl Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[j No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.. � a ..a. .. T.�. - i`�Y •^ a! �I ..i�Ji .
•%Y!'',n FP f..i n. y; V. ��F l'+.. �'t '� .� ^. �'answers
Camtnents�(re�fer`to qut o E.plaln any YES answesaudlor any recotunnendationsor�any otheco.mmeats,�f
Use dra ngs oc�ff facilityy, to better explaintsituations',(usi additional pages aVs tiece�;6yj..I)�"❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes 4,0'��"
.4ir.5�'•lY.i`. h;4
FACILITY WAS WELL MAINTAINED. THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
wer/Inspector Name Alan Johson
E
wer/Inspector Signature: J �� Date:

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road South
Concord NC 28025
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS130001
Porter Farms
Swine Waste Collection; Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cabarrus County
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 10, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Thomas
E. Porter, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS130001 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Porter Farms, located in Cabarrus County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 2000 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. AMW
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS•standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the.activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership,
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Cabarrus County Health Department
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS130001
NDPU Files
E

l
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: PORTER FARMS
Address: 4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Type of Operation: SWINE
County: CABARRUS
HU CODE: 03040105020060
Number of Animals: 2000
Your animal waste management facility had been designed for a given storage capacity.
When the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to
prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the
fields where waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil .
tests are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the
crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates and leaching
potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen. Either
of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should also
be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste are based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find infon-riation
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for
analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year: (gallons)
2000 animals X 3,203 gal waste/animal/yr = 6,406,000 gal waste/year
Amount of Nitrogen Produced Per Year (lbs)
2000 animals X 5.4 lbs N/animal/yr = 10,800 lbs N/year produced
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. Your facility is designed
for 180 days of storage. Therefore, it will need to be emptied every 6 months.
The following acreage for waste application will be needed based on the crop to be
grown and the surface application: (ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER)
Field
Soil
Crop
Rye
Lbs
Actual
Wettable
Lbs N
Months to
Numbers
Type
Tons
N/ac
Acres
Acres
Used
Apply
3
GoC
Fescue/
5.6
275
10.3
6.44
1771
March -October
Matua
4
GoC
Fescue
2.8
125
1.8
1.5
187.5
March -October
5
GoC
Fescue/
5.6
-275
15.5
13.39
3682.25
March -October
Matua
6
KkB
Fescue/
8.0
330
17.0
14.26
4705.80
March -October
Matua
7
BaB
Fescue/
7.8
345
4.2
3.1
1069.5
March -October
Matua
8
BaB
Fescue/
T8
345
L I
1.0
345
March -October
Matua
9a
BaB
Fescue/
7.8
345
2.2
2.0
690
March -October
Matua
9b
BaB
Fescue
3.9
200
.9
.9
180
March -October
9c
BaB
Fescue
3.9
200
1.4
1 1.0
200
March -October
-Total
Amount of N Produced
Surplus or Deficit
43.59 12831
-10800
2031.05
*This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield
expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the
N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require
farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan
that addresses all nutrients .
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of wastewater.

r
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
Field
Numbers
Soil
Type
Crop
Soil Permeability
(in/hr)
Application Amount
(In/application) (In/yr)
3
GoC
Fescue/Matua
2.0-6.0 -
.36 6.0
4
GoC
Fescue
2.0-6.0
.36 2.7
5
GoC
Fescue/Matua
2.0-6.0
.36 6.0
6
KkB
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
.36 7.2
7
BaB
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
.36 7.5
8
BaB
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
.36 7.5
9a
BaB
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
.36 7.5
9b
BaB
Fescue
0.6-2.0
.36 4.3
9c
BaB
Fescue
0.6-2.0
.36 4.3
Your lagoon is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation 91.8' and the level
should not be pumped below 88.9' to allow adequate permanent storage for treatment of
waste.
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
THE CLEAN WATER ACT OF 1977 PROHIBITS THE DISCHARGE OF
POLLUTANTS INTO THE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. THE
DEPARTMENT OF ,ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES,
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, HAS THE RESPONSIBILTY
FOR INFORCING THIS LAW.

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This swine operation (farrow to weaning) consist of 2000 sows. Breeding, gestation, and
farrowing buildings are flushed with recycled water from the lagoon. Liquid effluent will
be pumped onto adjacent pasture and hayland. Waste is to be applied to 40.19 acres of
fescue overseeded with matua and 3.4 acres of fescue.
The lagoon is designed with 180-day storage. (Total capacity 1,112,831 cu.ft.)
Therefore it will require pumping down to permanent storage level every 6 months.
Waste is to be applied to fescue/Matua during March -October. Waste may be applied
during the season when needed for nitrogen benefits or pumped as needed for irrigation
water as long as nutrient limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded (and waste is
applied to actively growing crop). NOTE: The waste in the lagoon must be maintained
at or below the maximum liquid elevation of 91.8'. Also, the lagoon level must not be
pumped below elevation 88.9' to maintain adequate permanent storage for treatment of
waste by bacterial activity.
The volume of estimated waste produced per year is 6,406,000 gal = 235.9 acre inches.
(6,406,000 gal / 27,152 gal/ac inch. = 235.9 ac inches) With the system applying .36 ac
inches/hr, the system will require 655.3 hrs/yr to apply waste. The system will apply .36
inches per application to area under gun of approximately 16.6 lb N per acre per
application. (5.4 lb.N/animal/yr / 3,203 gal waste/animal/yr x 1000 = 1.68 lb N/1000 gal
1.68 lb N/I000 gal x 27.152 1000gals/ac in x .36 ac in/application = 16.6 lbs.
N/application).
Nitrogen applications should be split over the growing season
during the period of March -October. Application rates must be
adjusted to waste analysis reports when received.
The irrigation system specifications indicate using a Kifco E30A Slurry Reel with 1000'
of3: ID PE hose, with hydraulic drive, and a Nelson SR150 Gun. The Nelson SR150
Gun is intended to operate with maximum ring orifice of 1.08 at 70 PSI, 197 GPM, with a
diameter of 310' (lane spacing of 230' or 75% of 310'). System pressure required is 123
PSI A 197 GPM. The system's Kifco NT120S engine driven pump is capable of
pumping flows up to 500 GPM at pressures up to 150 PSI. The application rate will be a
maximum of .36 inches per hour with gun cart travel speed of 3.83 ft/min.
The lagoon will be pumped down prior to December to -allow for storage during the
winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively
growing to take up nutrients. The lagoon will be pumped as needed to provide adequate
waste storage during the times listed in the chart on page 2. Adequate land is available
for proper disposal and utilization of waste produced.
Refer also to attached Waste Utilization Plan Required Specifications and information
provided on waste sampling for additional specifications and recommendations.

4
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Porter Farms
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approve animal waste utilization plan for the
farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system of construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the
farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: IF. Fr'-,,+C
lease print)
Signature: Date: 49 ' 3
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Prepared by:. -Di Sr1L4 Cvos'Wo► vilf - 07-aW3
N e Title Date
uSo a - H LCS

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AMENDMENT
Producer: Porter Farms County: Cabarrus
Address: 4455 Mt. Pleasant Road South Facility Number: 13-0001
Concord, NC 28025 Permit Number: AWS130001
Field Acres
Actual Yield By Year (Tons)
Average 5
Average
Field dumber
Expe o s RYE
Total Field Acres
Wettable Acres
Expected Yield
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002 -
Year
Yield
High 3
Yield
3
5.6
10.30
6.44
36.50
36.40
37.05
37.05
37.75
13.00
32.25
37.28
5
5.6
15.50
13.39
74.98
75.40
76.05
75.40
74,10
36.40
67.47
75.51
6
8.0
17.00
14.26
114A8
114.40
115.70
113.75
113.75
52.00
101.92
114.51
7
77.8 1
4.20
3.10
24.18
24.70
24.05
25.35
25.35
1 13.00
22.49
25.13
8
7.8
1.10
1.00
7.80
7.80
7.80
8.45
6.50
2.60
6.63
8.01
9A
7.8
2.20
2.00
15.60
18.20
15.60
17.55
14,95
7.80
14.82
17.11
NOTES:
Realistic Yields Expectations (RYE) for Fescue and Matua grass mixture which are used in the Waste Utilization Plan are higher than established USDA-NRCS standard RYE
for this crop and soil type. Porter Farms have maintained records of actual yields for each field. The average yield for the highest 3 years is higher than the expected RYE. For
this waste utilization plan, the expected yield will continued to be used. **During calendar year 2002, a severe drought affected the yields.
Porter Farms will continue to maintain records of actual yields of the Fescue and Matua grass mixture for waste application fields. If the actual
yields are less than the listed RYE for (three out of the five years), the RYE for that field and the waste application rate will be adjusted. The
adjusted rates will be based on actual yields.
Signature of Facility Owner:
Thomas E. Porter, Jr.
Dale
Signature of Technicial Specialist:
_ _
- - - - Watth J. 'nane, DA-NRcs - -
- - -Dale -- ----
1
1
Porter Farms 1 of 1 2l7103

R - N.C. DEPT. On
ENVIRC;NMENT,
1
}% & NAR) AL RESOF ' ',_'ES
AUG 23 2000
Amauot• 0f_ W�4.�F'l+- far I (gallons) l►-+ns) ETMOF Eta1�U6,:..�..! ;-a114BIT
MaRES','.UL OMICE
2000 animals X 3,203 gal waste/animal/yr W 6,406,000 gal waste/year
aML t o_ .r�9@.�4_R+'.. � @... �'er____Y' .:.r (lbs)
2000 animals X 5.4 lbs N/animal./yr = 14,800 lbs N/year produced
Applying the above amount of waste is a big .lob. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. Your
facility is designed for 180 days of storage. Therefore, it will need to
be emptied every 6 months.
The fallowing acreage for waste application will be needed based an the
crap to be grown and surface applications(ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER)
Field 1 Sail Crop
Lbs
N 1 Ac
Lbs N Months to
'Numbers! type
Per
Ac 1 1
Used I Apply
;
'
T1
3 1 soc 1 Fescue/1
275
1 10.31
2,830 Mahrch-October
;
1 1 1 Matua 1
1 1
_.__ *V(9oC-
_.�_--_....125-..._..'._i.-,8.,.,._..._.,..225
�� �_.__--.__.._..,e1---•--._-__.___-_-;.
41._Fescue
„
rt5-
w8aCr�+-Fescue/,'..._....275W._-.*15.5
1 f
*.__.4,263..._.,...'�___._.-,,,.___,......11__..,...._......._._.__-1
1 1 1 Matua 1
1 1
,
to
' 6 1 hk3 1 Fescue/1
33o
117.0,'
5,6lo
1 1 1 Matus 1
1 1
1
1
1 7 1 Ba8 1 Fe6cue/1
345
1 4.21
1,449 1
i e r Matua ;
1 8 1 BaB 1 Fescue/1
345
1 1.1;
380 1" Is
' Matus
1 9a 1 Ba8 1 Fescue/'
34S
1 2.21
759
1 1 Matua 1
1 1
1
1
1 9b 1 SaB 1 Fescue / 1
200
1 .91
190 1 "is
;
1 9c 1 Sa8 1 Fescue/1
200
1 1.41
280
------------
'ro t•a l
1 54.41
15,976 1
Amount of N Produced
1 1
0 0i'i 1
Surplus or PjLUrLt
1 1
.5.17E 1
*This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTES The applicator is cautioned that F and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management- plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.

Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
Wettable Acres
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Thomas E. Porter Jr
4455 Mt Pleasant Ltd S
Concord NC 28025
704-786-9551
County:
Date:
Cabarrus
1-31-96 (Revisers 9--9-99)
EXHO D-1
Fleidt
Number
.AFproshnate
JvainOm►
Useable Stu
of Fkld2
(acres)
Sol! Type
Slope
C.P s)
Mash—
Application
IGte3
(Inlhr)
Maximum
Applkatton
per Irigation
Cy'k3
Comntesets
3
6.44
GoC
FescuelMatua
.35
.75
5
1 .ga
GoC
Fesuce Matua
.35
.75
A Sriall Part of Field #4 is
jn(-luded with im
Gi
14.26
UB
Fescue/matlja1
Pa p d .S is
included with pull. #7 & #8
10
8 {'/
Ma
l See allached map.
2Total field acreage minus required buffer areas_
3Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section lI G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used_
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gan Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: Ufco Model E30A w/ 1000' of 3.0" 7n PE hose and a Nelson SR150 (fin w/ 1. 08" Ring
Held Not
ud
Hydrant Nat
Tm,,d
Speed
jpU )
AWkgian
Rite
(idtu)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (tt) Len (A)
Wetted
Diameter
(fed
EQUIPMENT SETMOOS
Nozzk Operating Opting
Diameter Pressure Presswa Are
Cmdrer Cron i) Red 7 Pattae3
Cow
3.1
2.8
210
310
1.08
70
1.1
3,2
2.8
.35
255
500
1 310
1.08
70
112
315
5,3
2.8
.35
255
660
310
1.08
70
112
315
5.4
2.8
.35
230
580
310
1.03
70
112
315
5.5
2.8
.35
230
760
310
1.08
70
112
315
5,6
2•.8
.35
255
790
310
1.08
70
112
315
6.7
2.8
.35
255
91Q
310
1.08
70
112
31
6.8
2.8
35
255
860
310
1.08
70
112
31.
6.9
40
-4-0-0
1.03
70
112
-115
Malke aurp. LQ rapmle t
10,10
2.8
.35
290
560
310
1.08
70
112
31.5
10.11
2.8
.35
280
380
310
1.08
70
112
315
I Sec attached reap.
2Show separnte entries for each hydrant localiat in each Geld.
3Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: l~ (full circle), TQ (throe quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees ofarc.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996
4.9

EXHMBIT D-3
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field Nal
and
Line No,2
Number of
Hydrants
Wetted
Diameter
feet
Hydrant Sparing (ft)
Along Between
Pipeline P[ eltnes
Application
Rate
(lnlhr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
(inches) Q Gun ( rant r
Comueeats
ISee attached map.
2Show separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in each field.
NRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

TABLE 4 - I rigation System SpaiBcatim
Traveling
][Eftatlon Gun
Sotld Set
I atlon
Flow Rate of SprhtUer (gprn)
197
xxx
persting Pressure at Pump (psQ
123
xxx
Design Precipitation Rate (ldhr)
.35
Base Length (fat)
1000
xxxxxxxx
Type of Speed CompcnssUou
Mech.
xxxxxxxx
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Dn zne
xxx
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
40 BHP
TABLES - Thrust Block Specifications
Deslener may Dravida thrust block details en senarate sheet
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. ft.)
W Bend
9
Iliad End
9
Tee
Drains
Gmind Fattvr Z—Pio
9
IS= USDA-NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
tv t
MRCS, NC
7UNE, -19%

EXHOIT D-5
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: David %Yearn
Company: Gra—Mac Distributing Compan�r�
Address: 2310 NC Hwv 801 N Mocksville NC 27028
Phone: [phone]
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
l . A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes. thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sou es and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
S. Computations used to determine We size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump. traveler and sprinldegs).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA -MRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV. Practice Code 430-DD
S. The information required by this form arse the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as
appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not he installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip 7 5 feel wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.
'a
NRCS, NC
TUNE, 1996

EX IBTr D-G
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start up, shutAown. winterizatiam and regular maintemame of all equipmzent.
1 See attached sheets for additional operation and sDecificati.on information. I
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

E'
Wettable Acres For P697 ER F-AIZM5
i
�,:'• ; ;..'Tiraval 'lane space 7 $^ New orExisting Tt
Start
Stop Total
i Md Table L. X W/43560 Total End Table Acres
$o
��
3 rs
EE 7S
a� s's
.43
. q8 6E75 1.07
p�
930
44...EFE'7S
$Cap-
&GO
g p^
_ � 55 ^
a '3 0
?30
�.s`s�
3. ��
3 . (%
q 8 EC
, y 3 Er 7 � q . O9
.2..$�._
r: ' .
(�
►EL 7 5-
CPU
FT- -7 S
5
aSo.
0
ET 757
760
y.0�
. y3 �=�S .� 5.01 _
. qS� EF�s 5,7(o
EE7s
�Ro
y.G;L
S. 33
aao
3
EE7 S
sS
. y $ EE -rs G . y 7
75
SlaO
_a�SS
$.03
$ EE75 . 17 _
EF- 73
yoO
1 y 0
1. aq
f a
o 6F7 sir
E.._..
_
ego
�57.
'E90+
3So
P8b
a.y4
• V3 C90 r 3: ��
�
.ram_—..' •_
�.-..—...r-.. _-_
_
.:� •
. Jf�
�
t � '
r
._-..err•..
-�.�r
_..�
-
��^
f, r
!

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales -- Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE* ADVANCE EXCHANGE
13361 998-3232
[phone]
NC TOLL FREE 1.800.422-3560
Porter rants
Specification Sheet
1. Wettable acres under traveler coverage is ± 48.63 Acres.
2310 NC HWY, 801 N
MOCKSVILLE, N. C, 27028
2. System Traveler_ is a Kifco E30A w/ 1000' of 3.0" ID PE hose and a Nelson SR150
Ginn with a 1.08" ring nozzle,
3. Nelson SR150 gun performance with a 1.08" ring nozzle at 70 PSI is 197 GPM,
and a dimeter of 310'.
4. Lane spacing is 2301.
5. Friction loss in 6" SDR21 PR200 200# pressure rated gasketed PVC pipe at
197 GPM is .11/100' .
6. Liquid velocity in 6" SDR21 Gasketed PVC pipe is 2.25 FT/Sec.
7. Pressure loss in 1000' of 3.0" ILA PE hose at 1.97 GPM is ± 42 PSI.
S. SyGtem pressure requirements are as follows:
Gun 70 PSI
1000' of 3.0" ID PE hose 42 PSI
Elevation ± 20' 8 PSI
± 2100' of 6" PVC pipe 3 PSI
123 PSI
284 Head Feet
9. .Application Efate is as follows:
96.3 X GPM 360
3.1 X . 9 rad i.us X ARC
96.3 X 197 360
3�!W —X .9 155� X 315
18971
61105 x 1.14 = .35 In/IIr. for 315 .Deg Arc
1�105
.31 x { 0 _ .62 In/Hr for 180 Deg Arc

GRAPMAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE 200 NC HWY, GOt N
f336Y 998.3232 MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 2702E
t336i 998-3800
NC TOLL FREE 1-000-422.3560
Porter Farms
Specification Sheet.
10. Travel Speed is as follows:
19.3 X GP1.1
Lane Spacing X Appl.icatign Depth
19.3 X 197 _ 3802 = J3 Ire/Min
230 X— 115
2.8 Ft/Min
= 1-68 Ft/1Tr
For 1801 Arc
315 = 1.75 2.8 Ft/Miry X 1.75 = 4.9 Ft/Min
180
- 288 Ft /H7-
11. System pump is a Kifco NC120S Frame Mount on a John Deere 4045D Power Unit.
12. NT120S Frame Mount Pump is capable of pressures to 150 PSI and flows up to
500 GPM.
1.3. Horsepower requirement For 197 GPM at 123 PSI is ± 40 .B1 P. The John Deere
4045D Power Unit_ is rated at 80 BHP @ 2200 RPM.

Design — Sales -- Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE.' ADVANCE EXCHANGE
10101 090-3232
19101 E9a-3800
NC TOLL FREE 1.800.422-3560
System Operation
Porter Farms
System Start -Up
2310 NC HWY. 801 N
MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27020
1. Attach traveler to hydrant and pull out hose.
2. Move pump to lagoon.
3. Prime pump.
4. Start engine.
5. Leave engine at idle speed until all air is evacuated from system lines.
6. Raise engine speed to meet require pump pressure. (123 psi)
i. Start traveler motor.
8. Adjust traveler motor speed to reach required hose speed. (4 ft/min)
System Shut -Down
1. Lower engine speed to idle.
2. Shut off engine.
3. Move traveler to next location or to storage.
4. Move engine to storage after pumping.
Winterization
1. Open all drains in the system. (pipelines, pumps, traveler, etc.)
2. Open pump discharge gate valve and leave open.
3. Spray lubricant into pump suction and rotate shaft to help prevent
rust.
4. Open ground entry gate valve and pour in a small amount of anti -freeze..
5. Leave ground entry gate valve slightly open.
6. After water has been evacuated, close pipeline drains.
Maintenance
1. Follow all manuals supplied with the system.
2. Grease hydrant stems annually.
3. Replace any wore or damaged parts as soon as possible.

,A ,AAA .
�- NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNT JR.-
GOVERNORr.'c:'
`x=
BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
7.
E,t
L J'i '�.
^r>—
f' ?
�.A
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 28, 2000
Tom Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Porter Farms, Facility #: 13-01
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Porter:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on August 22, 2000. Based on his observations, the records were found to be
complete and the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained.
Your waste plan indicated that approximately six million gallons of waste are
generated annually. However, your records indicated that approximately two million
gallons of waste have been applied annually for the past two years. Please submit in
writing an explanation for this discrepancy. You may want to contact your technical
specialist.
Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D - '2 4-�
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STRHET, M00RESVILLE, NORTH CAROL INA 26115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Q Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other .Agency
Type of Visit 34 ompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for visit +Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other
❑ Denied Access
Date or visk:
Facility Number 11 h t—1 1 r
Pr•inied on: 7/21/2000
t
o Not Operational O Below Threshold
© Permitted
❑Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑Registered
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name:
`.�1
L
County: .......
j C'.� ...................................
........... ...... ...................................
............... ........
.....
Owner Name
i.1:.S
�O
Phone No: ..........
]� �.....-.....� �c
FacilitcContact: ..............................................................................Title:.......................................................... Phone No:
Mailing.Address:........... .-.......(. V......... Lra.ti. .�4.'L. ....+5. .. ...............�c)t1...Lsd�'i .�...�...
....................................
Onsile Representative:...........f.C.? z........ ..... C.+.e.. ................ Iniegrator:......_.................................................
Certified Operator:. ... j5tr✓t,.................. [ ........ Operator Certification Number:.....f.2.,�(
Lpe-Stion of Farm:
I _ . _I,T
f5i(Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse I-' a �• �` �'` Longitude • 4 «
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle capacity Population
10 Wean to Feeder j❑ Layer ❑D—airy
❑ Feeder to Finish j❑ Non -Layer 1777�7:d❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean '? ,-',
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE3 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lags -n Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar_s,es S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 6M No
Discharge oriuinaied at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If di;chur,c is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If dischan c is observed. what is the estimated now in gal/thin?
d. Does cischarge hvpass a lagfoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ,kNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters 4 the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 9Spillway ❑ Yes 4kNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identif icr:.................................:...................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

lFacility Number: — l):,te 44f Inspectimi Printed ()n: 7/21/2000
5. Arc there any immediate threats to the intc�_,rity of any of the structures observed! (ic/ trees. severe erosion. ❑ Yes IKNo
scepat*e. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? El Yes 7-*0
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need main ten ance/improvement? ❑ Yes >NO
S. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1;No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings`? ❑ Yes E),1Vb
NVnNte Application
lb. Are there anv buffers that need maintcnancehmprovement'? ❑ Yes,[j_No
11. Is there evidence of e w applicati^n•? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes No
12. Crop type A�C, C' S
,_.:.
13. Do the receiving crops differ µ;ih those designated i'n the Certified Animal <Vaste Management Plan (CAWMP)'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage-ibr land application'? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement" ❑ Yes PaNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ,RNo
Required Records S Documeims
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'? ❑Yes �kNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUR checklists. design. maps, etc.) ❑ Yes P!�No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? Oe/ irrigation. freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes - No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes /V] No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? !/
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes � No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes ABoL[o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ERNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Ye�No
13; Nb-violatiflris'or. deft,ciendes •mere noted• dit•fi-ft fii'tis:visit: • Y:oi} .will-t"&00i iio fufrther
ctirres' bride' e: about: this :visit: '
Comments (refer to question #l:): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Iluy /J•. yLe- Icictri 4ic<s� �nc�ltJ[sis n� �["J,-isI •; c.s �to��ca �o.rl,1� `l- � ���(D+cS
` r rl �f�i't�� 4Yi. 1�e _'LA� cs.nCt IYS � �.,: Vr� CL c,CJ( _
Lo r,5 01\ �rL�C ��►'aX UV�� ro Lin �1tD�t SGIS, t..vcp�.:ST�-USG
'(� `'�' O.t.G� a-hv��G�l l _ �csw^eu�.+�r `�Qz�� C ta��l ��nDc�.: �{-Q1c��— i'�S5 t �^�✓l Z 4'hC � ~b
r- roc (:e— (it ' � (► c � t°"�_
l R
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 10 _ Date: Z 5/00

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
'odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge aUor below ❑.Yes AANo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �9(No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes/ No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes t5wo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ YesP9.No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenUtemporary cover? ❑ Yes 'I3o
5/00

VIP, Z4
F WAT V
'-0 'J E9QG Michael F. >=ashy
Governor
III William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
D' 'C ,Alan W: Qlrnek, Director
.Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 6, 2002
Tom Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Subject: Porter Farms, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWS 130001
Cabamzs County, NC
Dear Mr. Porter:
Mr..Alan.Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 5,
2002. Based on his observations, the records were found to be complete and the facility
appeared to be well operated and maintained.
Enclosed.please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: File
AM
N AR
Customer:Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gl ason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
'Mooresville Regional Dffioe,.919 'North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
-PHONE t704) 663-1699
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
FFacility Number 13 1 Date of Visit: 9I5/2002 Time-
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ __ __ __ __ __ __
Farm Name: Parter.Forms......................................................................... County: Cab us...._- -- -- -- -- -- �. ma ........
Owner Name: Thames._.------_-_-- P.otter.----------------------_-_--- Phone No:{7R4).7-2LsLLJ.85=$�i.2L�--------•---
Mailing Address: �k9 �. ..�itrnstttat.Raid. �autkt..................................................... cajac r.LM......................................................... 7.8925 ..............
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: ............................................... Phone No:
Integrator:�gill------------------_�__�_--------
Certified Operator: Tltitliil al. ........................... Fater ............................................... Operator Certification Number: 175.6Q....... ......................
Location of Farm:
Five miles south of Mt. Pleasent on Mt. Pleasant Rd. (SR 1006).
Farm is on the'left across from the intersection with Bost Cut Off Rd.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 21 07 Longitude 80Of 26 40 u
,Design (Current
..;Swine -icapacity -Population - '`Poultry .
5 ❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
2000
1923
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current - DDesign ;Current
;a aci d'a ulatian J Cattle CspacityPopulation
U layer I I JL_j Dairy
❑ Non -Layer " ❑ Nan -Dairy
, ❑
Other
`TotalaDeftn-4Capaeity`y 2,000
L: ToW..SSLW'. 866,000
_t
Subsurface Drains Present EJ❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [-]No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: --•--•--•--.......--•--•--
Freeboard (inches): 18
ncAn2/ni
�wwfirr •. w.f

Facility Number: i3-1 Date of Inspection 9/5/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aonlication
�.wsurueeu
❑Yes
®No
[] Yes
IN No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. -Crop type Fescue (Graze) matua
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land.application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require.a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about.this visit.
r'98MEM F[0:3Fie!1d !Cop!yOFinal Notes
FACILITY AND RECORDS ARE WELL MAINTAINED.
Reviewer/Inspector NameO_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f _ Date:

05103101
Facility Number: 23_I
Date oi'inspection 9/5/2002
Confinued
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes IN No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No

PORTER FARMS, INC.
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. s.
Concord, NC 28025
�tP4P1T. ie� s� r : HtAL7-lt
r4 L�t+I Anna r,+
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Home Phone [phone]
Ci�rl::'till r3� 7i'� 1-,'11;,'.rj;,"r!, 1 AR145F11®j
At 9Fii$F
Alan Johnston
919 N Main St.
Mooresville, NC 28115
November 19, 2000
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Insp.
Porter Farms, Facility #:13-01
Cabarrus County, NC
Waste Water Applied
Dear Mr. Johnston,
Responding to your request on the amount of waste watcr applied over the past two years. Additional
records on form IRR-2 were in the back of our spray records which were not calculated in your figures. The total
volume pumped in 1999 was 3,229,400 gallons and the total volume puniped as of 10-31-00 was 3,580,000
gallons.
In addition talking with Matt Kinane (resource conservation specialist) he indicated that figures were
added for normal rainfall. Annual rainfall for our area for the past three years has been far below average. We also
monitor water usage very closely to conserve water. 1 have also attended some seminars which indicate that sows
probably do not generate the amount of waste as was used to figure most waste plans in North Carolina. Please let
me know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Tonuny Po er

ASTA?' NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF
s ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1 ..
r NCDENR MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
JAMES.H. HUNT JR.
-GOVERNOR < August 31, 2000
+_N
f1:
Certified Mail
�.. Return ReceiQt Requested
BILL HOLMAN z
SECRETARY
Tom Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd.
- Concord, NC 28025
Subject: Wettable Acres Determination
Status & Notification
Facility #: 13-1
„ 'fv Dear Mr. Porter:
You were sent a letter requesting that you provide me with the necessary
-R,._
7.
information to complete the evaluation of your facility with respect to a Wettable
Acres Determination. The result of this evaluation and the required action to be
taken by you is indicated below.
v �'� µ"7. • Based upon the new information your facility is exempt at this time from
undergoing a Wettable Acres Determination. No further action is necessary at
I this time.
rl If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
I j}•.- contact me at [phone].
Sincerely
--. Alan Johnson
Environmental Specialist II—` cc: Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
two-c.3L, _-.n'ri-"\.:'-�•i_ i•. �-��
919 NORTH MAIN BTRCET� MOORESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 2811E
PHONE [phone] FA 7C 704-063-8040
'
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLER/10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

oF wArFgQG
to
o c
Thomas E. Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Dear Mr. Porter:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.; Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 9, 2002
Subject: Operation Review/Compliance
Porter Farms, Facility #: 13-1
Cabarrus County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be lvailable for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application.records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be dear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspection.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions, if there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
1
Alan D.Johnson
Environmental'Speciaiist II
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street; Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

J+ + am]
oF w A rF9QG Micha . Easjley LLL,,,JJI
-
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March 20, 2001
Tom Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Porter Farms
Certificate of Coverage AWS 130001
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Porter:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 16,
2001. Based on his observations, the records were found to be complete and the facility
appeared to be well operated and maintained.
It is suggested that when taking the weekly freeboard measurement that the reading be
made from the crest of the spillway rather than from the maximum liquid level mark.
. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
?`bEN
ustomer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

.Y. .:r:%: ii M.s.:`r..-.r.:,,.-'F � �-: ..-.Y�`1r' �%`�•s1: �,T••..y%F�� -:; ..,t �.. _ - - .,� .�. ..�,
•.i•. ��'.:i,'•1.:i�.����,.j}��r}ti• �;x..+r�•=a-_ DRYLSeoti;of, .BtCl: L Fih:�+^r'' �+-, :�: _`-•��*�.'•,��:.' �-y1�f^��,
.�il��3•�.:.- •.f7'F'.t,,+-•�_ '.7: J'��-;�!`n- •,ry.w.;..,..�. y,y;f+�^�..�ii'".,s...�zw�.;_ � _
A��,p Divisien'of Sub and: Ater. ooservation„� „_z
:w �trtr,zt • ' �^';; -''S
•�F! .mow �.p-.,�.�' �,,,r..,-.> �y�_.A• x?'l. � Yr�-�i�i 7"'''T'�iV
■ . ' l7 t: fi a zr� tll$CA tiYy¢ t j.. ,t• ,�I �f. r�..�
.f ��
._,,•w ti. Wt+;ra: •.�J.i+ CL�-C•'..•x• �:�}F�7'�rta`:%:f;-1.5i!r��..: st•=�. `tom � :fr :tt:�:6i'�+!tr „•�.:�:*f::��t�
Type of Visit- Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason. for Visit 0111outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I Date or Visit: Time: i
O Not Operational O Bciow Threshold
Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:...........
Farm Name: ................. _..�1s.:. t` !�..... Ct Sc:..!l1r1...............--
Owner Name:,••c� cy►� •, >C'�
..................... �.._................._.......G......X:t........................._............
County-�i•� -Y1� ...........
Phone No: ................ ...... ............. ...............................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:........................
Phone No: •.
Bailing Address. _..'4 Y-! - :..............af
Onsite Representative:......... L�.�...-.....���
Certified Operator:........... vF ............................�&
....?. .a-54 E_ .......
.... .........................
_.... .
Cr�t� ........�''�
integrator: _....:.... ...........
...................
Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
+ Swine 4 it ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude • Longitude �` ��• �••
t
Design Current
Swine Canaciri• Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
i v
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Are -
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges A Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of Elie State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No -
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge hvpass a lagoon system? Elf yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes [No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [3,No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: _� Date of InspeCtiori""" `C '
-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard:plus storm storage) less than adequate? �5piilway
❑Yes ��No
Strui:iure 1 - 5tructurc 2Structure 3 Structure 4 ' Structure 5
Structure fi
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .-_.>T ........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes ,�] No
_ \
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes +� Na
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes allo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum -liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes qNo
W2.9te Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ANo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑Yes Z No
12. Crop type--
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW1ViP)?
❑ Yes t No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
t:) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes qNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes jLNo
17. ock outcrops present?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 iE:;s there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oc/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes XNo
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes JkNo
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicabla setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ®No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency.situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ,� No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes is( No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 6No
27, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW1ViP?
❑ Yes No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes ;Cl No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes No
01/01/01
Continued

�- Facility Number:=-- - - -. Date of Inspection 4 ��
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property) ,
__31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,.etc.) -.
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. I)o the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover?
Printed on: 1/17/2001
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ❑ No
-M No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name -
Reviewer/luspector Signature:
Date: .311t`le /
01/01/01

r-cwjl ty I'JurnuUS — Lagoon tvumder - Lagoon Identifier
O Active O Inactive , n Latitude Longitude ❑
By GIPS or, Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater encountered during ,construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
46. Adequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
O less than 300 ft O 300 ft - 1000 ft O greater than 1000 ft
0 Yes 0 No
0<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No 0 Unknown
O Yes 0 No O Unknown
O Unknown
O Yes O No
O Yes O No
O Yes O No
I

.State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill! Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road South
Concord NC 28025
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
IIkT?W'A
IT
1 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENviRONMENT AND NATURAL- RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 13-1
Cabarrus County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
S in cer ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Y'~
i
R
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
:and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
William E. Holman, Secretary
Thomas E. Porter
4455 Mr. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Dear Mr. Porter:
A IT
• •
NCDFN'R
NORTH CARouu^ Dm%m:rrMEKr or-
EN%nRcm . ew ANo NRCURAL REsouft=
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 3, 1999
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
'Porter Farms, Facility #: 13-1
Cabarrus County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 31, 1999. In
general the facility was in good shape. However, you need to ensure that the weeds in your waste
application fields are kept under control. Also, a current waste analysis is needed for your files.
Please note that during many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The following items
must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number, usabletwettable acres (not necessarily total
acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
Itis suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan which must be posted.
• -Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must,be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of Violation
or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications should be made during.the time the
crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days
prior to planting.
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North-Carohna 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyeieW10%-post-consumer paper

Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
,� D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File

Division of Soil and Water -Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection'
Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection r 24 hr. (hh:inm)
Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
� County:
Farm Name: ............. ._c 1 �7 .1 ...............4 ✓'.it4�. ..............................County:..........4.-�..�:1�1.1��1/1..3..............................
OwnerName:...................................._T7G............... ............ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact; .............................................................................. Title:.............. Phone No
Mailing Address: ..... ���`"E�.:,?.,.../i..T............ r�1....� k...ed. .�r..............�....................... ............ 02..©�..
Onsite Representative:........ 6 �o.1.... Integrator:........................................................
Certified Operator: .......... :,>74 A"4•6;,,,,,,, ,, w Y , Operator Certification Number:1.
Loca--ti—on of Farm:
—1
atitude Longitude
Design Current ' Design -Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population'
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW ,
Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
. surface Drains Present ❑
'.INumber of Lagoons .. 0 ❑Sub ❑ t; P Y
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated ac [:]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Suite? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ' ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 1Z No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ASpillway ❑ Yes 4N0
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .......'T..Ll........I....................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on b ck

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Ya [J No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes )Vl No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes /tM
12. Crop type t'11��vtip`
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes pivo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes X-No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
WYes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes 10 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ,t.No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ANo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes &o
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
A Yes ❑ No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes JKNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes Jj No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes V No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes 5d-No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes X.No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes qNo
�Vo yitjl'a i0ris:0r.dg a enctes iv�re jagtetl dt;�t'i>tag phis"visit; Yoh will �ecgiye o fU t�gr
ctirrt s�ondeni & about: this visit:
�y ixt€ tflF'1 ttxaaP k3[€�6rv'9 €�4q pnYRs+ tnl P ,I
Comments{refer to, quest #) Explain 'any YES,answers andlor'"a'uy recommendations orrany�ott er�eomments.`
Use drawings of facility totettec`explain situainoas (use'additlo'nahpages as necessary) }<€';,, �; ; •
; ;�.
S %.5
5"cwl� e , c�a �. P1NM�� 6� --ia w �-{ 1:► v� lad aka IS
Ne.e� � .[:1.:5�Y-we�•I-�.I�r ey��a� �� �.�e�s �.1"�. v.�u��e-
� i�� c
u
_iz_:`eA4,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: �(✓� r-
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Date of I11spection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes f No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Ycs ^No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes NJ
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes *0
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes P�Vo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? AY es ❑ Nu
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
w
3/23/99

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number; -- . -1 Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: n - Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Ao-o Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit ,3111 exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: .2 . Operation pended for w !e acre
determination based on 1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: fv a pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption,)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an 1 or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails _one of the .eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in overapplication of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according #ofarm's-last two years -of irrigationTecords.-..
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous.ditches;failure to.deduct required.
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage .identifiied.in-CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields -fields less than-5-acres fortravelers-orless than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination.required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' Z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
l�
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERS - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres -and having -received less -then 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the•farm's previous two years' (1997 S '1998) of irrigation records,zannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in -the comment section and must be -accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P1 Plan lacks foil win information: a c�
P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to -below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):

JAMES S. HUNT JR.;
GOVERNOR
-• WAYNEirICDEViZ7«-, ;,
IF
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 19, 1998
Thomas E. Porter
4455 Mr. Pleasant Rd. S
Concord, NC 28025
Subject: Site Inspection
Porter Farms, Facility #: 13-1
Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Mr. Porter:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] GOP FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / APFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

i a
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen pplication for CommonCrops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorgbum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• r Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
prdaucer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Cabarrus SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
46
6 gr i"ivision of Water Quality L
k
HP%outine 0 Coninlaint 0 Follow-ut)of DAVO instiection 0 Follow -no of DSWC review 0 Other I
- 1�4
— --- - ------- Date of Inspection I 11tZ4
Facility Number I
Time of Inspection E&nZ124 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered, fkCe_rtifiedJ3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted JE3 Not Operational . I Date Last Operated ...........................
­ Farm Name: .............P...C. �: .......i.-VVV...S ..............-........................County:........
�z ................................
OwnerName: ......... y r6h. h-.? z 1.5........... ................. P& .. ........................... Phone No: .......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ............................ ................................... I ............. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ............................
7­ ... * .............
. ..... 5A ... ....... ............................................
Mailing Address: ........ 14fj_5 . . ........ ..... PrI
Onsite Representative: ............ 7Xdm,a,:F ................... 1, PIC ....................... Integrator: ............ I ................. .... ................... .................
Certified Operator ......... 74!a.4-7 A . ...... ..................... . ................... Operator Certification Number,...... —6.0 ..........
Location of Farm:
L t L I'
...... C".kok ...... rzk'*\� ............
I ---....(!IA..-.-- . -....Rd:... _..........0
Latitude
Longitude
P trepe, 5a, f-
Design,' ,,,Curreint E I Deisign Current Design Current
,Swine CapacityCapacity
.Population Poultry "Capacio Population Cattle ci 'Population
U Wean to Feeder Io Layer I ❑ Dairy I I
❑ Feeder to Finish I0 Non -Layer I 1 10 Non-DairyL I
RjEow to Wean J
El I Farrow to Feeder Q Other
El Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
0 Gilts
El Boars Total SSLW
Number pf Lpgioons: Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1'1[j Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding
No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [I Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discha.'rge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
k., No
❑ Yes
�No
0 Yes
0 No
0 Yes
[] No
0 Yes
El No
0 Yes
PI.No
0 Yes
Wo
• Yes
2NNo
• Yes
;.No
• Yes
XNo
Continued
on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure. 2 Structure 3 . Structure 4
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes J�No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft).......�i:... �.......................................................................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
IL
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
,� No
12,
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
A No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type d.SG.. ................... xs....GEC............................ ..................... .............. ............. ............................................
.............................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management ['],in (AWM13)?
❑ Yes
No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�[ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
( No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes
91 No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
V No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
tA No
For
Certirigd or Permitted FacilitiesOnl y N J
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MP?
,❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No.violations or defieier c'ie's were,noted:during this:visit.- You.will receive no further
.�:�correspbtidenceab"out this'.v�sit:•:•�.�:��.. �.•��.- '.� �:�'.•;.::�. .�. :.•,�..�..,�.:.�.,:�.�• ,
Com ments (refer'to question #), I:xplam any.YES answers andlor any rrcomimendattons or any"other comments.,.,,.,,
Zt
Use=drawings of facility tti:better explain situati6ns,juse additional pages as necessary} yP,
7/25/97
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
V

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Thomas E. Porter
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. South
Concord NC 28025
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
AX? '
••
0,�
N C D EN.,cR
0� }*A"tVV AL A'tv-�OUFtt3D;;i
June $,1998
JUN 12 194$
Subject: Additional Information Request
Porter Farms
Facility Number 13-0001
Animal Waste Operation Permit Application
Cabarrus County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject permit application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review.
Your WUP lists crop yields for fescue and matua grass that exceed NRCS Standard Realistic Yield
Expectations (RYE) for your soil type. Please contact your Technical Specialist and have your WUP amended to
include a condition that allows you to use this increased application rate as long as your actual yields meet or -
exceed this increased crop yield rate for three out of five years. Additionally, please include within the condition
that if these yields are not met for at least three of the next five years, your application rate will be adjusted to
reflect actual yields produced on these waste application fields. All amendments to WUPs must be signed and
dated by both the landowner and the Technical Specialist before they are submitted for review.
All revisions / amendments are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical
Specialist before they are submitted for review. PIease reference the subject facility number when providing the
requested information. All information should be signed and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address
below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before July 8,1998, or the Division will
return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be
considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 533. .
Sincerely,
Katharine Keaton
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

MAY--09-99 FRI 04:37 PM CABARRUS SWCD _
6432 P.Oa
1998 CONSERVATION FARM FAMILY
CA$A.RRUS SOIL & WATER CONSFRVATION DISTRICT
Address:4455 Mj, PJLeas X Rd-,-5, CaAQgvL.. --CAbAMQQoMW
State N& - ZjR 28925 — PhRim 74 78Ot2551
Name aroma to qpw on awudcwMe to
off Nations, Offlces Held and Manors Received:
Watershed Improvement Commission, "nun
Cabarrus Chamber of Commerce Agri -business Committee, member
Cabamis County Cattleman's Association, member and past president
1992 Concord Rotary Club Farm Family
Southern States, past member of the board of direetors
Mt, pleasant Middle School Parent-Teochtr Orgaiiization (PTO), past president & vice-
presidcnt couple
St. Thomas Aquinas Catholic Church, member
Conui ONly In ormadon: Livestock %formadon:
Acres
Major crop(s) Type *Read
Haylaiid 25 Dairy.......,.
Hogs......... 1900+
Rar%dpastare 450 Beef cattle.—
Woodland/forest 195 Cow/calf ...... 200/200
Other Sheep..........
Poultry, ....... 25,000
TOTAL. 5�g

MAY-08-98 FRI 04:37 PM CABARRUS SWCD
1 jai 793 6432 P.04
.M#Jor Sot! &later Consavadox Tuchniquay;
The home place was in row crops when it was purchased, All fields have now been
converted to pasture. Some of the rental land was also used for row crops before
converting all fields to pasture. Animal waste plans are followed for frog and poulryy
operations. Pastures are maintained in excellent condition by fertilizing and liming
according to aoll tests, rotating livestock. and interseediWoverweding as needed.
CompostcM critical area treatments, heavy use areas, waste storage structures, have all
been used to conserve natural resources.
x Conaery don rechWques (30 points)
Idet d* the wit and waW mourw Managa n t problabs found on your Am. Descu ibe tlu inwvatiw aP wall u to dittoW
oonm vadon teehpl" you have need to add ss these omblemt.
Managing hog and poultry animal wastes has been the primary conservation challenge.
Managing runofi"from fium buildings and roads, and heavy use areas has also required
conservation measures. All the fields at the home place were converted Rota cropland to
pasture and are used for land application of animal wastes. Fifty-five acres are irrigated
using liquid animal wastes. Matua grass has been introduced into fescudclover stands to
provide better m&ient utilization while providing better grazing for livestock. Small grain
is ovcrseeded in the fall for the saute reasons. A heavy use axes was installed next to the
barn so ,pastures would not be damaged by traffic during wet periods.
R' Consenwdon Education (20pol mV
Tell how your Arm hu boas wad In alder to OedwaMato to other■ la the oommUt ity the problems and aotutiona In .aricuMwW toomm
CMAMV14ioa. ZhVWn O bw wVS that you pubucito YM MawVagon t4Cht U$$ aid omepta.
The Cabanas County Cattleman's Association has toured the £arm in the past and a tour is
scheduled this spring for the St, John's Grange. Community leaders and farmers were
invited to anti► open house and tours of the new hog operation. Cargill Company literature
has featured the farm. We participate in career days at Mt. Pleasant Elementary School,
and the school has brought classes out to our farm to study agricultur% sea how food is
produced, and learn about natural resource constsrvittion,

1 70`t 72g _r P. 0S
MAY--08-98 FR I 04 :38 PM CABARRUS SWCD _ r*�
CHI CoMM*eMsive cons" Systems (30p0in4
DUar& the woe is whA yvu luvd gGn%W "maWj?Z P atMUV
for an or&o agtiauibual and lhrcrsry ad 411a cn yF t &m
In accordance with an animal waste management plan, animal wastes are composted
and/or stored before being used to meet the nutrient needs of the pastures. As mentioned
earlier, matua grass and &:Hall grain ere used to increase nutrient uptake. The pastures on
one of the rental farms provide 100°!o of the food supply for the oattle on that farm.
Rotational grazing and stockpiled forages have eliminated the need for feeding hay. A
water system supplies clean water to all pastures.
The N.0 Forest Service has worked with us to develop a forest management plan for our
135 wes of trees. The forests an the fhm provide shelter £or wildlife including deer and
wild turkeys, while the pastures with clover provide a source of food.
IV. In4Nvtdaa11n1dadHe (Zopofnts)
Explain to what dMcat your M hoer, initiadva and eqWymeid an used in developing stud bmplgnant►a& yqu vaum- tloq ►srhrri 0M
bwimu what ways in WOO you lave ands you aolb< Mtka ayrtew coat effediv'a Tell haw you gas alul.d in mwvatioa.
We were atnong the first farmers in Cabamus County to take advantage of the N. C.
Agriculture Cost Share Program to help us solve canservation problems on the firm. We
Were also the first farm to register w required by the state _0200 aWmal waste regulations.
We want to stay one step ahead ofall rules and regulations. We are presently reviewing
the existing waste ,management plan for our 25,000-breeder replacement poultry operation
to be sure we are in voluntary compliance with pending new legislation. Ilse areas
surrounding the poultry houses and hog lagoon are fenced so that Cows can be used to
selective grace the grass, reducing tha ncod for mowing.
We treat our leased land the same as our own farm. ,At our own expense, we drilled a well
and laid over a mile of pipe on one of the farms we rent to provide a clean source of water
for our cattle. We also sub -divided the pastures (also at our own vl pense) to improve
grazing efficiency. By using rotational grazing and stockpiled forages, we have eliminated
the need to feed out hay, saving us time and money by eliminating trips to and Horn this
farm that is across the county.
v Dewy** *AY You hwelce Coruervadotic (May be used for news purposes)
We want eveiythiag to look nowt and nice when folks drive into the farm. We also cut the
Wass weekly for the neighboring church for the same reason. I try to maintain our
driveways so they don't wash during rainstorm. i don't litre to see the ground in my
pasture. Conservation is the right thing to do, and protects my firm as well as the rest of
the environment. I'm drinking the water. Everywhere I have anunals, I have wells, and I
live right in the middle.

MAY-08-98 PRI 04.39 PM CABARRUS SWGJP
795 6432 P.06
Thtw generations of the Porter &wily live on the fw-m. This is is 1411 ttme, Airnlly farm,
providing 100% of the income. Their pastures are among the best -maintained pastures in
the county. Their immediate neighbors include a childoare facility and a chw-ch. State
inspectors monitoring compliance with animal waste regulations give consistently high
evaluations ibr this Arm.
Farmer Division of Soil and Water Conservation employee Todd St. John noted on one
evaluation report, "This arm is immaculate and is kept in excellent condition. This fhrm
could be a model of oxoellent management."

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN IPT REQUESTED
Thomas . Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. South
Concord NC 28025
Farm Number: 13 -1
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
March 20, 1998 MNYI ON"i19"rr, t:F:,c:rt'
MAR 23 1998
VISION of NVIRDtMINTA! 'V:A"rVJENT
IRMUME RV4111 iAi OFFICE
You are hereby notified that Porter Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has
sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please.call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
A. ar , r., . .
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, Norm Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd, South
Concord NC 28025
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Porter Farms
Facility ID#: 13-1
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Porter:
81'4VC. F31,>,r. Oar
NATVR�i , r: "'IPA [ ,1,I,�
2� eso�`IZC S
NOV g 1996
ifl�lSlDf! OF [Fil OfllffNrAt l.,'AN4CfnfNT
uOCBfSVfttf RLSIOMA! OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., , Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, K 14C FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
A_-- Health and Natural Resources `° � • �
Mooresville Regional Office A
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary EDIEHNF:Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MARCH 19, 1997
Thomas Porter
4155 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Porter Farm, Facility #: 13-1
Cabamus County, NC
Dear Mr. Porter:
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on March 7, 1997 by Alan
Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are indicated
in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
Your facility appeared to be in good condition. Please continue to work with your local Soil and Water
District concerning your farm certification.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also,
please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per, day
per violation as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental laws and regulations. If
you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gl ason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Cabamrs SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
q4t'onal Coordinator
"i
919 North Main Street, ! �y�C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 ; . 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

z t� ❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review iR pA} j
q _; k-jg-DWQ�Anlmal Feedlot OperatiJon'Site Inspection
routine O Cam faint O Follow-up of MV2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status:— .........» ......._..... ....
Date of Inspection 13/?/7119
Time of Inspection 0 Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm h'ame:.,l.�L� .... ...Z �I!'Ci?..... _......_.».�.. r.... Couary.__�f'i!GeS............_..................
Owner Nante:Plione No:._ 7 ��.L' _ES.,L............. _... __..._..
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: _...... ._..... ....._......_..... Integrator:..-...-.. . . ..... . ..... ._.....» ......_......
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: _ .. ..........f
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �° ���
❑ Not U eratianal Date Last Operated:.. .....!C __........_ . ......_ ..._�.................. .....
r ....__....
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swene >''
.. `: Number ,y ` 7:=
Poultry .
Number
Cattle - Number
, .
❑ Wean_
.
Layer
sj
❑ Dairy
N
[) Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Seef
Farrow to Wean
Y
QX
x
Farrow to Feeder
,
,
Farrow to Finish
❑Other Type of Livestock
1
Number of Lagoons l Holding Ponds I0Subsurface Drains Present - t
r 3� ' „z�t'�`y x .. ` ` , ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ljl� No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Wo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is•observcd, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ -Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R.
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Cl Yes 0No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes VNo
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

V. AO aww+uJ uv% u► �,VHLJJI II" wiuj auy alijim auic acwa4A %,IILUIlat
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after l/l/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Frceboard (ft): Lagooq.l Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste_ Application /V//�_
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type >rr )4 !!YL ........,,�tpf ��..>� :.. .........._ . _ �...
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 7 7GGf`-ej PG 3 � ,•�
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only //`-
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
u asa ,q1,.V
❑ Yes A Na 1
i
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 4
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES ansvVets and/or -any recommendations or any.other.comments:..
Use drawings :of faoi] 4-to' better explain situations: (use additional,pages as necesFsary)
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 4�No
❑ Yes T"
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,RNo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Resdew•er/lnspectorName
Reviwer/InspectorSignature: Date: 3LAI
ec: Division of Water Quality; Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
r Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresvllle Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Tommy Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road, South
Concord, North Carolina 28025
1DEi.HNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 26, 1996
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Lagoon Inspection Report
Porter Farms
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Porter:
Enclosed is a copy of the inspection report for the inspection of the animal
waste storage structure(s) conducted on duly 25, 1996 by Ms. Linda Vernon of this
Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If any problems or inadequacies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary actions to address the problems
as soon as possible. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes
provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal
penalties for violation of State environmental laws and regulations.
If technical assistance or financial assistance is needed, please contact your
local Soil and Water. Conservation District.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent
under separate cover. -If you have questions regarding this matter, please feel free
to contact Ms. Vernon or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Cabarrus SWCD w/attachment
Facility Assessment Unit w/attachment
Regional Coordinator
LV
919 North Main Street, NV��C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
n Mailing Address: Vftyli c �a S
County: C aNac,r uS Integrator: Phone:
78Y 48�1(F.".V)
Site Requires Immediate Attention: tS6
Facility No. 13-1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:141A X. 1996
Time: a:30 ft
Farm Name/Owner:
Phone: 764 - 2 f,
e of Operation: Poul rao soaoso�
Type p try_Cattle_Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: a000 fJ+eo. SO'Cahs
Latitude:39 ° al ' 01" Longitude: Fa ° c'.b' y0" Elevation:r(ol) Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 h ur storm vent
APf-ox. 91, F'.s ''I/ -
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) eor No-,4eta} Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No Was any erosion observed? Yes o N®
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate. Ye or No
Crop(s) being utilized: 'F45C114.16 s_
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria 200 eet from Dwellings? Oor No
100 eet from Wells? e�r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o(No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes de
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? YesIor No
Additional Comments:
be I'n) de,,a-Ior*d 1J Torkw
fMPrci3frQ. b�f?r�t*On
Inspector Name ., f-rxl&- • K rolco
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
VQry
Signature _64V L, • ve'�
L

r'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Moor esville Regional Office
James' B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Thomas E. Porter
4455 Mr. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Dear Mr. Porter:
QZIW
6�_&
OEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Porter Farms, Facility #f: 13-1
Cabarrus County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main 5tree=, N%ICAn
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, !North Carolinc 28115 Eclucl Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 509a recycled/104; post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
l � �
C)t�so .)�'
Water Quali egional Supervisor
cc: Cabarrus SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
GJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Tommy Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road, South
Concord, North Carolina 28025
.. r-in
1DEF.HNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 26, 1996
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Lagoon Inspection Report
Porter Farms
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Porter:
Enclosed is a copy of the inspection report for the inspection of the animal
waste storage structure(s) conducted on July 25, 1996 by Ms. Linda Vernon of this
Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If any problems or inadequacies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary actions to address the problems
as soon as possible. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes
provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal
penalties for violation of State environmental laws and regulations.
If technical assistance or financial assistance is needed, please contact your
local Soil and Water. Conservation District.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent
under separate cover. .If you have questions regarding this matter, please feel free
to contact Ms. Vernon or me at [phone] .
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Cabarrus SWCD w/attachment
Facility Assessment Unit w/attachment
Regional Coordinator
LV
919 North Moln Street, Nil
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolino 26115 CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmotive Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/IC% post -consumer paper

Site Requires immediate Attention:
Facility No. 13-,1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
.DATE:3k�X, 1996
Time: c9'W2.(W-
Farm Name/Owner: te r r rn
Mailing Address: q4.0 M+ • �t iva^ _ _ d S . erv..' f nc1__.
County:_ CaNrfus Integrators _ Phone:
On Site Representative:"Ton%Mr A %P-NE*V(- Phone: - - 94 1 �#13 70 79S
Physical Address/Location: Sr W
A
Type of Operation: Poul ��� yp p try CattIe� Design Capacity s Number of Animals on Site: a000 wa..w ks
Latitude 3S ° aA ' 01" Longitude: Fa ° -d-' qa" Elevation:�Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboarr4 of I Foot + 25 year 24 h9ur storm Fvent
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yee or No -Act Freeboard: Ft,_- hest 1
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No Was any erosion observed? Yes o ND
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate. Ye or No
Crop(s) being utilized: Fesc t..
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria 200 eet from Dwellings? 'e�or No
100 eet from Wells? ?9br No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o(No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? es or No
Additional Comments:
be'A.� d4vILI"prd
fMPrei3Iv9.
I V MY* y
Inspector Name LI� 1, • V r0lan
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
very
Signature_6�l�A r']r.
L

.4
WASTE UTILIZAT[O;`; PLA;`,
Producer: PORTER FARMS
Address: 4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NIC 28025
Type of Operation: SWFNTE
County: CABARRUS
HU CODE: 03040105020060
Number of Animals: 2000
Your animal waste managcment facility had been designed for a given storage capacity.
When the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to
prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the
fields where waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic•yields of the
crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates and leaching
.potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen. Either
of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should also
be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production, the waste should be applied to a growin+or crop or not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste are based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find infonnation
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for
analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

amount of Waste Produced Per Year: (gallnns)
2000 animals 1 3.203 C7al waste/animal/yr = 6.406,000 gal , , to/,Tear
Amount of Nitrogen Produced Per Year: (lbs)
2000 animals X 5.4 lbs N/animal/yr = 10,800 lbs N/year produced
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. Your facility is designed
for ISO days of storage. Therefore, it will need to be emptied every 6 months.
The following acreage for waste application will be needed based on the crop to be
grmvn and the surface application: (ACP`ES OWNED BY PRODUCER)
Field
Soil
Crop
Rye
Lbs
Actual
Wettable
Lbs N
Months to
Numbers
Type
Tons
N/ac
Acres
Acres
Used
Apply
3
GoC
Fescue/
5.6
'275
10.3
6.44
1771
March -October
Matua
I
4
GoC
Fescue
2.8
125
1.8
1.5
187.5
March -October
5
GoC
Fescue/
5.6
275
I5.5
13.39
3682.25
March -October
Matua
6
KkB
Fescue/
8.0
330
17.0
T4.26
I 4705.80
March -October
Matua
7
BaB
Fescue/
T8
345
4.2
3.I
1069.5
March -October
Matua
I
8
BaB
Fescue/
7.8
345
1.]
1.0 4
345
March -October
Matua
1
9a
BaB
Fescue/
7.8
345
2.2
2.0
690
March -October
Matua
9b
BaB
Fescue
19
200
9
.9
180
March -October
9c
BaB
Fescue
3.9
200
1.4
1.0
200
March -October
Total 43.59 12831
Amount of N Produced -10800
Surplus or Deficit 2031.05
"This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield
expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K maybe over applied while meeting the
N'requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require
farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan
that addresses all nutrients .
See the attached rnap showing the fields to be used for the utilization of ivastewater.

APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
Field
Numbers
Soil
Type
Crop
Soil Permeability
(in/hr)
Application Amount
(In/application) (In/yr)
3
GoC.
Fescue/Matua
2.0-6.0
.36 6.0
4
GoC
Fescue
2.0-6.0
.36 2.7
5
GoC
Fescue/Matua.
2.0-6.0
.36 6.0
6
KJ B
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
36 7.2
7
BaB
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
.36 7.5
8
BaB
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
.36 7.5
9a
BaB
Fescue/Matua
0.6-2.0
.36 7.5
9b
BaB
Fescue
0.6-2.0
.36 4.3
9c•
BaB
Fescue
0.6-2.0
.36 4.3
Your lagoon is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every-6-months. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation 91.8' and the level
should not be pumped below 88.9' to allow adequate permanent storage For treatment of
waste.
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
THE CLEAN WATER ACT OF 1977 PROHIBITS THE DISCHARGE OF
POLLUTANTS INTO THE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. ' THE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES,
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, HAS THE RESPONSIBILTY
FOR IN'FORCING THIS LAW.

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This swine operation (faiTow to �veaning) consist of 2000 SoNvs. Breeding, gestation, and
farrowin ,buildings are flushedwith recycled water from tN, lagoon. Liquid effluent «-i11
be pumped onto adjacent pasture and ha}Hand. 1.��aste is to be applied to 40.19 acres of
fescue overseeded with matua and 3.4 acres of fescue.
The Ia(,00n is designed with 180-day storage. (Total capacity 1.112,831 cu.ft.)
Therefore it will require pumping down to permanent storage level every 6 months.
Waste is to be applied to fescue/Matua during March -October. Waste may be applied
during the season when needed for nitrogen benefits or pumped as needed for in-ivation
water as long as nutrient limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded (arid waste is
applied to actively growing crop). NOTE: The waste in the lagoon must be maintained
at or below the maximum liquid elevation of 91.8'. Also, the lagoon level must not be
pumped below elevation 88.9' to maintain adequate permanent storage for treatment of
waste by bacterial activity.
The volume of estimated waste produced per year is 6,406,000 gal = 235.9 acre inches.
(6,406,000 gal / 27,152 gal/ac inch. = 235.9 ac inches) With the system applying .36 ac
inches/hr, the system will require 655.3 hrs/yr to apply waste. The system will apply .36
inches per application to area under gun of approximately 16.6 lb N per acre per
application. (5.4 lb N/animal/yr / 3,203 gal �vaste/ariimal/yr x 1000 = 1.68 lb N7/1000 gal
1.68 Ib N/1000 gal x 27.152 I000,als/ac in x .36 ac in/application = 16.6 lbs
N/appli cation).
Nitrogen applications should be split over the ;rowing season
during the period of March -October. Application rates must be
adjusted to waste analysis reports when received.
The irrigation system specifications indicate using a Kifco E30A Slurry Reel with 1000'
of 3: ID PE hose, with hydraulic drive, and a Nelson SR150 Gun. The Nelson SR150
Gun is intended to operate with maximum ring orifice of 1.08 at 70 PSI, 197 GPM, with a
diameter of 310' (lane spacing of 230' or 75% of 310'). System pressure required is 123
PSI A 197 GPM. The system's Kifco NT120S engine driven purnp is capable of
pumping flows up to 500 GPM at pressures up to 150 PSI. The application rate will be a
maximum of .36 inches per hour with gun cart travel speed of 3.83 ft/min.
The lagoon will be pumped down prior to December to allow for storage during the
winter months w-hen the ground may be saturated or frozen and crops are not actively
,growing to take up nutrients. The lagoon will be pumped as needed to provide adequate
:waste storage dining the tines lasted in the chart on page 2. Adequate land is available
for proper disposal and utilization of waste produced.
Refer also to attached Waste Utilization Plan Required Specifications and infonrlation
provided on waste sarnpling for additional specifications and recommendations.

WASTE UTILTZATfONT PLAN, AGREEMENT
\game of Farm: Porter Farms
Owner/Mana(zer Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approve animal waste utilization plan for the
faun named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system of construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEN) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state frorn a storm event less
severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the
farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Rr
(please print)
Signature: Jjc�7,�, bate:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Prepared by: 'T��t�x«� rl LA -,3 ca -n74j
NanQ Title Date
k-iS DA - HISS

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AMENDMENT
Producer:
Porter Farms
County:
Cabarrus
Address:
4455 Mt. Pleasant Road South
Facility Number.
_
13-0001
Concord, NC 28025
Permit Number:
AWS130001
Field Acres
Actual Yield By Year (Tons)
Average 5
Average
Field Number
Expected RYE
(Tons)
Total Field Acres
Wettable Acres
Expected Yield
1998
1999
2000
2001
2042 .•
Year
Yield
High 3
Yield
3
5.6
10.30
6.44
36.50
36.40
37.05
37.05
37.75
13.00
32.25
37.28
5
5.6
15.50
13,39--1
74.98
75.40
76.05
75.40
74.10
36.40
67.47
75.61
6
8.0
17.00
14.26
114.08
114.40
115.70
113.75
113.75
52.00
101.S2
114.61
7
7.8
4.20
3.10
24.18
24.70
24.05
25.35
25.35
13.00
22.49
25.13
8
7.8
1.10
1.00
7.80
7.80
7.80
8.45
6.50
2.60
6.63
8.01
9A
7.8
2.20
2.00
15.60
18.20
15.60
17.55
14.95
7.80
14.82
17.11
NOTES:
Realistic Yields Expectations (RYE) for Fescue and Matua grass mixture which are used in the Waste Utilization Plan are higher than established USDA-NRCS standard RYE
for this crop and soil type. Porter Farms have maintained records of actual yields for each field. The average yield for the highest 3 years is higher than the expected RYE. For
this waste utilization plan, the expected yield will continued to be used. "During calendar year 2002, a severe drought affected the yields.
-
Porter Farms will continue to maintain records of actual yields of the Fescue and Matua grass mixture for waste application fields. If the actual
yields are less than the listed RYE for (three out of the five years), the RYE for that field and the waste application rate will be adjusted. The
adjusted rates will be based on actual yields.
Signature of Facility Owner:
7rrr.�
.-� R - - &3
Thomas E. Paler. Jr.
pate
Signature of Technicial Specialist:-,np,.�,
- p
-- - - . -
Matthew ne. USpA-NRCS
pale
Porter Farms 1 of 1 217103

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
15
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 20, 1998
Thomas E. Porter
Porter Farms
4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. South
Concord NC 28025
1 • �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/QuRAL REsouRces
JU.t 23 194j
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS130001
Porter Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Cabarrus County
Dear Thomas E. Porter:
In accordance with your application received on May 11, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Thomas E. Porter, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Porter Farms, located in Cabarrus County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 2000 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS 130001
Porter Farms
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. -.A namelownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change.in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
Sincerely,
t
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: . (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Cabarrus County Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water QualitySection .'
Cabarrus County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

f
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resour sQ9Cff
Division of Water Qualityiril!u_�,gaN
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form y
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAl�i..,... 1 1998
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste O t*To Trmitrrnq
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Porter Farms
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Thomas E. Porter
1.3 Mailing address: 4455 Mt, Pleasant Rd. South J
City, State: Concord NC Zip: 28025
Telephone Number (include area code): [phone] or 785-8891.-
1.4 County. where facility is located: Cabarrus
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Mt. Pleasent Rd. South 1006 5 miles south of Mt.
Pleasent. 112 mi. north of Miami Church Rd. Across from intersection of Bost cut off Rd. and Mt, Pleasent Rd. South
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): C A-9 r i 0- iz K _
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/93
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 13 (county number); __I_ (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description- Swine operation
-Fa ow to Wean
2000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? TYyes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum nuinbU for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No, of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow) _
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/26/98 . Page 1 of 4

A
3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): _ 54.4 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 37
2.4 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or a
(please circle one)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or(please circle one)
2.6 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRC Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
E or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? �4
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? [ "
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your -initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.)
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, such as an irrigation design,
or site evaluation, please include the additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98
Page 2 of 4
Applicants Initials
p

Facility Number: 13 - I
Facility Name: Porter Farms
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, OzTM MK (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for O g Teiz Fa-m 1�_ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by rre and is accurate an complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will bf r turned to me as incompl
Signature Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, __ (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed y me and is accurate and complete tote best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 3 of 4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AMENDMENT: 1.0
Producer: Porter Farms County: Cabamas
Address: 4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd., S.
Concord, NC 28025
RECEIVED
Facility: 13-0001 WATER 90AIJTY SECT110N
JUN 1 91998
NIm-0 scharge permitting
Realistic Yield Expectations (RYE) for Fescue and Matua grass mixture which are used
in the Waste Utilization Plan (signed and dated January 17, 1996) are higher than
established NRCS standard RYE for this crop and soil type. The application rates listed
may be used as long -as actual yields for the farm meet -or exceedthe-RVE rates listed -in
the WUP for at least three out of five years.
Porter Farms will maintain records of actual yields for waste application fields. If the
actual yields are less than the listed RYE (for three out of five years), the RYE for that
field and the waste application rate will be adjusted. The adjusted rates will be based on
actual yields.
Signature of Facility Owner: - ' p
Thomas E. Porter, Jr.
Signature of Technical Specialist:
Rich4d Taylor, Caba�4VIVater Conservation District

cAWMP Wdtahale Acre 11-30-"
CAWMP WETTABLE ACRE COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification)
2. Irrigation System Designation
3. Type of Irrigation System
Field Number (Identification)
Existing Irrigation System
New / Expanded Irrigation System
Stationary Sprinkler Hard -Hose Traveler
Center Pivot Linear -move System
4. Number of Stationary Sprinklers # Interior sprinklers # Exterior sprinklers
Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes
5. Wetted Diameter a I Q [feet] From field data sheet yev Length of pull [feet]
6. Spacing 2 3 0 Lateral / Hydrant Spacing [feet] [as percentage of wetted diameter]
Sprinkler spacing along lateral [feet] [as percentage of wetted diameter]
7. Sprinkler or Hydrant Layout Multiple Laterals/Hydrants
Single Lateral/Hydrant Excessively spaced Sprinklers/Hydrants
8. Read the irrigated area per sprinkler/travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate tabale and
column based on pattern, spacing, and sprinkler/travel lane location.
Stationary Sprinklers
Acres per Interior sprinkler from Table Column
Acres per Exterior sprinkler from Table Column
Traveler: Interior Hydrant (travel lane)
S (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull
(Pull Length [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]) / 43,560
• 31 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Interior pull (Sum: a + b + c)
Traveler: Exterior Hydrant (travel lane)
e QN (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull
{Pull Length [feet] X Wetted Width [feet] }/ 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Exterior pull (Sum: a + b + c)
9. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per sprinkler or travel pull by the number of sprinklers or pulls
of each category in the field. Sum all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per Interior Sprinkler or Pull X # Sprinklers or Pulls = Acres
(b) Acres per Exterior Sprinkler or Pull X # Sprinklers or Pulls = Acres
Total Wettable Acre for field (Sum: 9a + 9b)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date:

Np S AllIR1
31� 5100HOS 0� �y �09 �ybnti by kDROk
\ r� PUQIp1 ; n No •Oti �s r 0'a �''r^;v
y1 NI _O
ryb� s odd �y ONalOIW f �eoako
,36 e ��" \
M N7 13ti°� d
w
vZ 109 N35 i/ yYc m a ow
a �x Z3NI3 y° ti' om
3y ya61� a -do
fiH IbWK
v 3X tl }ya
� ` J a b VHSTA �M - �` 3 3fS4ttl mil}
7S5 I S)ko a dv
- - ti SRd A eg
b 1Soe
NIrW.-, o S� IV13 018'0o� 7tln
j .f G'lH J JS! OIN ! 'J
00a < V b` J It
� " BJO�S rr '' z rn atzld
SI1dvB a��
4 3 8$g1SCO Sv7M
c � D 1
�y ' 3Nv1 `' ei bAGWO 4u3pADp a
wf � � Pi. O - 0 •N 7
n � r fiV"'yV3 aOOZ r, ay n >sq S13`J918 �� �' WO x03 0 g 7
ryb
Ir 5��` o Od r M3rl m' "� 6 7io 30dy` �r�dWrg r,",� N 1Qiy9Fv �•`a 111W
,�i•, °H l�t'A Yd - °y m o y °j
'k'q,' 4�tl""bbar m
r �.h baA I9 ' � . .i. oa x I g od
a �,4• UI °' �3� 109 Vd
AbO d 3n� dt 3b�1S SJ
Iwaiw
�\'Ga y m z a
a
d,
I09
�
£1 �• Y �a s�N' �o� 3?�r 6b w
No
1
zn C. + J CA km o �• a awd3a b�� �asw r o R
0 ti6t! 1119�W
oar day
�h d 109
oaf & o� �� N t4 o p 0auj
°
N�ypp 'oa 3sna�
Itl a
a 1 • `�'° °� r eb ss I yH�� dam} ° 1 O7 ''i�� t`r
yo a o 1 I jdm
'MO Qy \ �: -i�: rx "s ti J S LU;Ob S� ri tl35iK
Mai '�Jd �/ ? C: f✓
y� 0, � � 5 ti. :50J,y .^. � 3. ! �/ d• Od s i .,, ,/
. J �k18RlN� Oil J' ^yr ,4DJT4 Oa v},y ctlj0�21 11„ ro �. J b�, � ^ 10tlnHa� 1.
w dlf1� g aA3 A JaUJI lai VA 0
s }
'y.-
mU4' Aby39 Nb 4/ di t11� / 'tea aa+ ��e �v� f•� .off' s w.
(lid
.-
�,���-a 4.- ? F f Na 11n�'

WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN
Producer: PORTER FARMS
Address: 4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd. S.
Concord, NC 28025
Type of Operation: SWINE
County: CA6ARRUS
HU CODE: 03040105020060
Number of Animals: 2000
Your animal waste management facility had been designed for a given storage
capacity. When the waste reaches the designed level. it must be land
applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses
nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan
in order to maximize the fertilizer- value of the waste and to ensure that
is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on
the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates and leaching potential.
Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre
per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production, the waste should be applied to a growing crap or not more than
30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be
based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility.
Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management
Commission.

i
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year: (gallons)
2000 animals X 3,203 gal waste/animal/yr = 6,406,000 gal waste/year-
Amount of Nitrogen Produced Per Year.• (lbs)
2000 animals X 5.4 lbs N/animal/yr = 10,800 lbs N/year produced
Applying the above amount of waste is a big jab. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. Your -
facility is designed for IeO days of storage. Therefore, it will need to
be emptied every 6 months.
The following acreage for waste application will be needed based on the
crop to be grown and surface application:(ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER)
f--------------------_--------_--_--------_-----------------------------------------
Field :'Soil Crop :RYE : Lbs 1 Ac L.bs N 1 Months to
.Numbers! type (tons.' N/acl Used 11 Apply
-------+-_----+-----_--------+---------__----------+------------------------
3 GoC Fescuel�5.6 275 �10.3 2,B33 March -October
f Matua 1 i i
-------+------+---------+-----+-----+---_-+-----_---+--------------------------
! 4 GoC Fescue :2.8 ; 125 : 1.8 f 225 " "
---------+____--+--------+-----r-------+------r----------+-------------------------!
5 GoC I Fescue/15.6 275 '15.5 4,263 '
Matua I i 1
-----_...,-------+--------+__--------_----------------+-----------------------
6 KkB Fescue/f8.0 330 :17.0 5,610 1 "
Matua f
-------+-------+----------+----+-----+----------------a------------------------- f
7 1 BaB Fescue/:7.8 345 1 4.2 1,449 l
Matua
-------+-------+------_--------------+------------------------------------------
8 ! BaB t Fescue/:7.8 1 345 1.1 ! 380 It
It
Matua
------_+------+---------------------+-------+---------a--------------_---------_--
' 9a I BaB : Fescue/.7.8 345 2.2 1 759 It"
Matua f
-------+------+___-----+----+-_--_--+-----+------_----+---------------------------
' 9b BaB Fescue/:3.9 : 200 .9 180 "
-_-------------r---------+----------+-----_---------__+-----------------------
' 9c : BaB ; Fescue/:3.9 : 200 1 1.4 : 280 [
+.....---__--------__------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 154.4 15,979
Amount of N Produced 10.800
Surplus or Deficit 5.179
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management
Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have
a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.

S&e attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste
water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
+--------------------------___--_-__-____---_____-----_---------__-----_--_+
Field 1 Soil Crop :Soil permeability; Application Amount 1
1Numbersl Type 1 (in/hr) : (In/application) (In/yr)
_____-_+--___-+---_-------+------------------------------__
3 GoC Fescue/ 2.0-6.0 .36 6.0
Matua
.-_---_+----_-+-----__--_-------------------+----_---__-----_----_----_---;
4 GoC Fescue 2.0-6.0 .36 2.7
-------+------+------------+-----------------+---_---------------------------1
5 1 GoC 1 Fescue/ 1 2.0-6.0 .36 6.0
1 1 Matua 1 1
---------+------+------------+-----------------+--------------------------------1
1 6 1 KkB 1 Fescue/ 1 0.6-2.0 1 .36 7.2 1
1 1 Matua 1
-------+------+---------_--+-------_--------_--+---------------_
1 7 1 BaB 1 Fescue/ 0.6-2.0 1 .36 7.5 1
1 ! Matua 1
---..............-----.........-+---.........-------...----...........---------+-.....,.,---.....,....---._...----._...__---........,.__.... - ;
8 1 BaB 1 Fescue/ 1 0.6-2.0 1 .36 7.5 1
1 1 1 Matua 1 1
-------+------+-----------+------------------+----------------w---------------;
1 9a 1 BaB 1 Fescue/ 1 0.6--2.0 1 .36 7.5 1
Matua 1 1 1
--------------------
1 9b 1 Bab 1 Fescue 1 0.6-2.0 1 .36 4.3 1
_-_----+--_---+---_-------+-----------_-----+----------------------------
9c 1 BaB 1 Fescue 1 0.6-2.0 1 .36 4.3 1
+---------------------.------------------.--_------------_-----_--____-___-_--
Your lagoon is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no
instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed
Elevation 91.8' and the level should not be pumped below 88.9' to allow
adequate permanent storage for treatment of waste.
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the
waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to
apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
THE CLEAN WATER ACT OF 1977 PROHIBITS THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS INTO THE
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND
NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, HAS THE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFORCING THIS LAW.

NARRATXVE OF OPERATION;
This swine operation (farrow to weanling) consist of 2000 sows. Breeding,
gestation, and farrowing buildings are flushed with recycled water from the
lagoon. Liquid effluent will be pumped onto adjacent pasture and hayland.
Waste is to be applied to 50.3 acres of fescue overseeded with Matua and
4.1 acres of fescue.
The lagoon is designed with 180 day storage. (Total capacity 1,112,831
cu.ft.) Therefore it will require pumping down to permanent storage level
every 6 months. Waste is to be applied to fescue/Matua during March -
October. Waste may be applied during the season when needed for nitrogen
benefits or pumped as needed for irrigation water as long as nutrient
limits and infiltration rates are not exceeded (and waste is applied to
actively growing crop). NOTE: The waste in the lagoon must be maintained
at or below the maximum liquid elevation of 91.8'. Also, the lagoon level
must not be pumped below elevation 88.9' to maintain adequate permanent
storage for treatment of waste by bacterial activity.
The volume of estimated waste produced per year is 6,406,000 gal = 235.9 ac
inches. (6,406,000 gal / 27,152 gal/ac inch. = 235.9 ac inches) With the
system applying .36 ac inches/hr, the system will require 655.3 hrs/yr to
apply waste. The system will apply .36 inches per application to area
under gun or approximately 16.6 lb N per acre per application.
(5.4 lb N/animal/yr / 3,203 gal waste/animal/yr x 1000 = 1.68 lb N/1000 gal
1.68 lb N/1000 gal x 27.152 1000gals/ac in x .36 ac in/application = 16.6
lbs N/application).
Nitrogen applications should be split over the growing season
during the period of March -October. Application rates must be
adjusted to waste analysis reports when received.
The irrigation system specifications indicate using a Kifco E30A Slurry
Reel with 1000' of 3" ID PE hose, with hydraulic drive, and a Nelson SR150
Gun. The Nelson SR150 Gun is intended to operate with maximum ring orifice
of 1.08 at 70 PSI, 197 GPM, with a diameter of 310' (lane spacing of 230'
or 75% of 310'). System pressure required is 123 PSI ;D 197 GPM. The
system's Kifco NT120S engine driven pump is capable of pumping flows up to
500 GPM at pressures up to 150 PSI. The application rate will be a maximum
of .36 inches per hour with gun cart travel speed of 3.83 ft/min.
The lagoon will be pumped down prior to December to allow for storage
during the winter months when the ground may be saturated of frozen and
crops are not actively growing to take up nutrients. The lagoon will be
pumped as needed to provide adequate waste storage during the times listed
in the chart on page 2. Adequate land is available for proper disposal and
utilization of waste produced.
Refer also to attached Waste Utilization Plan Required Specifications and
information provided on waste sampling for additional specifications and
recommendations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Porter Farms
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system of construction of new facilities will require a new
certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management
(DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-
hour- storm. The approved plan will be filed on --site at the farm office and
at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: :no rn)gf _S �E. ORT erg -5'g�
(please print.) .-. --
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager
(If different from owner) :
Signature: Date:
Prepared by:
Name Title Date

U.S. Department of Agriculture Page ]
Natural ReSC,UI-ces Conservation Service
------------------------------------------------------------
PORTER FARMS
Field Listinq
Tract NUrmber: 9.50
------------------------------------------------------------
Field Fiel❑
Number Acres LandUse
------------------------------------------------------------
1
5.3
Pasture
2
6.6
Pasture
3
10.3
PastLlFe
4
6.4
Pasture/POUT try Facility
5
15.5
Pasture
6
17.0
Pasture
7
4.2
Pasture
s
1.1
PaStur-e
9
11.3
PastUl-e/Swine Facility

[ � l r ' � �� � �v3l ate, � �' • � �i �'
i. Lam, _y.� 1'/� • Y- �\
t �• M'! .ill Y +,11V w,r
.� ' .1 a1 ..�..•1'•\.. •r.u13 ^far .•• 4.'
14
IL
��ar '` .�'. �' ti.l s+'�i. _` � j.• .5IL'.a: •'<' .1.�• � y �;r : `; , k .. j,� _ ,� 'ice.= ..
��'�,r '�.IJ•~•�.t•.•• ��. a.3.,:�\•+'~ •�. r �r�].i,-..'s�. .l:!,'"e'_.' ;Cti'�:'::r-;L�
JF
Y 1t • � '_l.«: r, . yt'• '..:.�. y �:_ .r Li: ".1I rir•�.r. _ rt.:'+�.':�{ ;':'• ••
v'. i,•-
# «: .:\-, ;:f. •..,i' •'Z. ~ ;�a ' •mob'•
�'` `:�\:? \mod, 1. .•`•• � .� 'i�•, \ �:' '.'
l � Yam. ••l• •� J •.��•`:: +- �'�•"M_�'yc�,--� � ,h,t, -.G'� 't 4i. _,. � •~,• ,4. �;
+�; ,..' �• 1'1• -.�". y3tl.ti,\•ram. +�'„". 1}. \.`. �.,• .� a. i ;1L• ?.
. ate_ , * \ f�, �''��' * l''`'`:i'i� f. •. ic; �'a 1i41.:..�•,, ;�[• . 5.:
;.r 4 -�15,- - i3♦C•s •.ti. .:' '�•�•t -.'Y L\ ''-. r: r` .i�= O 't';. .
A , 4�`•1'• a,n y
�� ��k� :4• � ':;'�:��_•�...�.:t..?�,"`�,:t*jam t��:4; .•., .�..
F i 1 4 • 4�ia•,if:. t.� r• . s . fi . � _} •. L .,a1 Z - ,
r • :4• i`�;-( '�_ •' .ii••'�`� ""*�, ( '•ti:a.•. t� �,.f a .�Yi': t _t" to"-�S•E'�.5.�7
.5 '= i `y.' r` l''a'�"• a. - r`. , 9.. '. �'.� ., Ya �.T -' .-♦ • Tt Y"' • � : � St'♦w-%'♦
. � , i'. ', .'':. as-. �' �:J '", :1� , .. +1 •'' .
`.y�j!. •� � , .i \ Via. 1•: - .. -
-✓. 'r� , =;' •. �� 1. •�•••� ., ' + l�. .. ' '.,,' � �-f. ,•{

THOMAS E PORTER JR - PORTER, THOMAS E , JR
Rlap
' mbo 1
BaB
,
,
,
GeB2
h
,
GoC
Soil name and description
Badin channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
These gently sloping, moderately deep, well drained
soils are on upland. They farmed in residuum from
Carolina slates and other fine grained racks. The
surface layer is loamy with a significant amount of
channery mixed in. The subsoil is clayey. Permeability
is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. Soft
bedrock is within a depth of 20 to 40 inches. Seasonal
high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes,
eroded
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded
soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum from
Carolina slates and other fine grained rocks. They have
a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Permeability is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is
low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Goldston very channery silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes
These gently sloping to strongly sloping, shallow, well
drained to excessively drained soils are on uplands.
They formed in residuum from Carolina slates. They have
a loamy surface layer and subsoil with a significant
amount of channers. Permeability is moderately rapid
and shrink -swell potential is low. Soft bedrock is
within a depth of 10 to 20 inches. Seasonal high water
table is below 6.0 feet.
TaP 1 Tatum silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
These gently sloping, deep, well drained sails are on
uplands. They formed in residuum from Carolina slates
and other fine grained racks. They have a loamy surface
layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate
and shrink -swell potential is.moderate. Soft bedrock is
within a depth of 40 to 60 inches. Seasonal high water
table is below 6.0 feet.

it �l:.lir• { �� yr � ���. '�� �• � - ;�� 1 �'Y'�':� r 'i
77
IV-
jw
Val
Q L� AD
�i "t... 5 ii' s=• n 1j1 c, l t s.
` � _'• :mil - ,' ';r... � • 'ti. ',� lJi�. _ •'�1 ;.
. i:J' rS •'iJ '"�• ,.i� � �` / ,,((Cl�!'J4 .�"'�' ; ^• �� � ,'`.�,C/ � `��a T�l�+i
^j �'^7 .. ✓ -eA 1'Ty�� T y:,• �' r 1•. ■ T::1: i'/`s � � - r _y•
-ltA ot'. '�tjf.-' .� �Y,V': ' .�'� ,1 .'. .Y• .-�rl s�•• � � ryi�`D 4�rj L/� ti.41Rtit��1 ��' :.>�.
� .rr' •!�'� ;;�� ...,� �. •�•:>.'ffir',;'t'� ..i '• �7 � i:�4r"-�i:i�4 �%r'J� r
�,,,r ,r „ ,`e� .i rR: \'� J �� •v �•!INS
i ti"ftiCe '" �• n m
��..,wyti'
:�► �: � �,�:t.l.'��a•'�\.fa_ :�,i�e '; :��' 15e !b .•��i5� - 4't'1'•���,�,~ •� �• �'�a:;��R•
. r� �� v�1•,,�l��i��'`i ��1 i ��, � r �. �1 'j, -. .'�4i7'i'n t'• `•� � ��
'� Ow��' ��r� I h t�%`���� •, .� \`�s�y\• I *.�'�' "` �r�t`�pJ J/�. .. !, _ i y Y�
's "F yet-,. t f3x.� i' °�:ti�,.� �� �.' _, � � '•`��`,v l r i�
..�'EIVIF
� t �''� � \'•fir `l, r .�,( .�� .:�. , '
',, t' 1 ., 1!P . r. ; 't: ,' ti I i! I j rfr�, •'�I 'c R
77
van
IZ
lr�, •�•�� t, „�5;�1\! .�i '�a Q��a;, �` a`!� �, f`: �• ! �•''^`•...r.�J'r�" �` u�„ •�-•r F w
Ufa\ w�.. ,�'i�, ,!. :/ �'V4� / •'�J � '�� �.✓,
/� ..
;.��.�� ••. ice', `� � .: /� :1•�� I r 1 / � •'��i� �ID fir'''. �• i:,,�r.� �-.
t b F I.
• i ' Ri ��-�;'"..%� `err'', ..� ,., .�"`�' � , *, �

iifjj
� i � / � V � + • may✓/' _
gaol
O
i - ; I •tip i i ` 1
✓ - ��e e ' 'I%7-4
•
�� °4 s f 9• 1 J �l
r� �� - • � �V rid' P �' �� i. �� r'i p . . "_V �.n1 t .\ �� ,L9 1' i 1 '
`...I � ' �" "'� � \ A � '�/\� f ' U may\ '4y+ ✓� •fill
En
or 0
' 'A I~

I} }'-'Y
r:..:.. ....--.. �. .. .... ... .. -.:'-. .:.:...-.. ... .r... ... n. ..5. ..... .. .n. .. e.....v ..r ..r ... ...f .r.tr
REQUIRED 52ECIFICATTQNS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are
subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Environmental. Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the
producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the
life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource ylanage men t System (RtiFS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
4reater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate ftlter•strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by
DENT.
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application, Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not camased by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important consideration
vhe;e ;will:. poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface applied. Surface
broadcast solids or sluries may damage crops if leaf surfaces ax! matted. Generally waste
should be applied such that no more than =0 to =5 percent of the leas area is covered. This
should not normally be a concern where diluted, low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface
broadcast from a liquids holding structure. Where crops are severely damaged due to

RE 'TRED SPECTFTCATION5
waste application, the plants cannot assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to
surface waters is likely to occur.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fail or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may
be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are
present.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned
by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided thev have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into
water courses, and only then at agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition
to the one ( 1) foot mandatory freeboard.
I8. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
{lagoon embankments, berms. pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary. to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species. etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or
discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste 'handling structures, piping, pumps. reels. etc., should be inspected on a regular basis
.o prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular ma incenance checUist should be kept
on site.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHO'N'E NUMBERS
DWQ r704-1y(Q3- 109
E'.Iv[ERGEvCY y[AvNAGE'vIE�T SYSTEM 70-q l792-0411 �
SWCD =4 z l B 2105'
MRCS - a
This plan will be imolemenced in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running oft site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The foilowing are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may not be
possible. Suzaesced responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm co increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
S: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application races for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakaae from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush -systems. houses, solld separators -action include:
a. Scot) recycle pump.
b. Scop irrigation pump.
Make sure ho siphon oczurs.
d. Stoo all tiows in the ?rouse. t1USh ;Vstems. Qr ialid ;epurators.
Du__:ttii�z 13. 1110.6

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting* Trumps.
E: L_akage from base or side -.%-all of lagoon. Often this is sz_oage as opposed to
flowing_ leaks- possible acrion:
a. Dig a small sum or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
Put in a submersible pump. and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and Fill
holes and compact with a cfay type soil.
c. Have a proressional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
?. assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters'
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration'?
c. Anv damage noted, such as employee injury, fish Tails. or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property'?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters'
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
tr. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal. business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-7j3-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name. facility. telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill. weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EvIS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES. phone number - - , local SWCD off ce phone number
and local MRCS office for advice!technical assistance phone number - -
If none of the above works call 9 i l or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for ,you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:. 5• J' FLOVJ6 6RA-D1A ;
b. Contractors .address: WDLAr D 1 N -�.
� _
c. Contractors Phone-:
l

6: Contact the cechnicui specialist who eercitied the laI_oon (NR(;S. Con�ulcin_
Enginezm etc.) r
a. Name: RWArW—I+ gL00- CAAWAUS 5v&O 4pikot i NRGS
b. Phone: 04- 4 -'Igg- AIOU
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical :ssisrance agencies to
rectify the dama;e. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep probiems with release of wasces from happening again.

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Suul i-e
Cause
IJRII's lu mil linlizc Udor Site Specilic Pl aclicec
I':IIII1SICad
• Swil1C ploductiol1
@I Vegetative or wooded buffers;
lt( Rectlmineuded best minig mellt practices;
lit Good Judgment and common sense
Ammal body s places
• hilly limmllc-Coveled allilll,'ll5
Ef Dry flours --- ---. .-
il��n slfilacrt
—1i;�t mclniur cuvclttl llurns
iF Sluticd Iluurs; -
IY Waterers located over skilled Iloms;
Ef Fecticrs at high end ofsukid Iluels;
f/ Scrape manure buildup firom Iloors;
wUnderfloor venlilalion for drying
-A—Milk n111cctitnl Ails
• Wile;
Fr Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge, - ---
• hillial miclubial dectlmpositiull
OF scrape;
wUnderlluur ventilation
%Te11t11:1tioll exhatist fails
• Vulalde gases;
Ef Fall lunintellince;
Dust
Efficient air momilellt
-Illdl1pl till Iacet
• Dust
_ wasildown bcllvccll groups orallimals; - -
❑ Feed additives;
❑ feeder covers;
Red delivery downspout extenders to feeder
-
covers _
1=tu�h laukt
Agoaiiou urlecycled Iagoun
❑ Flush lank covers; -
liquid while tanks are tilling
❑ E.-Mend fill lints to near bollom urtanks with
anti -siphon mils
-f loch Aleys a Agitation during ►vaslcwalcr &F Underfloor Iush with underfloor vcntilaliun
cun►cyance
I'll iechal ge puillls 0 Agitation of tecyclell lagoon Cl ExIcud recharge lines to near bultom of Ails
liquid while Ails ilrc lilling wills anti -siphon vcnls
1-01 claliuns • Agitation durhig sump lank ❑ Sump tank covers - ~
filling and drawdown
Utllsidc thain Colicclion • Agitation during wastewater ❑ flux covers
ur jlmcliun huxes conveyance
AAlrlt ►cnlbcl 11. 1996, Page 3

A.-r+'s to Miuiruize Odur� site Specific I'I ncliccc
C:anse TT
Iald of thainpipes al
• Agitalitnl dill ing wastewater
❑
liMend discharge point of pipes undeincalli ---
larvolt
Culiveyallce
lagoon liquid level
I.agtlull sill hlCcs
0Volatile gas emissions;
Proper taguon liquid capacity;
• Itlultigical Illlalllg;
I(
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agilalion
f(
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Minimum agilalion when pumping; tjbpd
CJ
Mechanical aeration;
❑
Proven biological additives
Ilsigatiull splillOcr
0 high plessutc agii.11iuu;
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
llor.zles
0 Wind drill
Minimum recommended operating pressme;
Q
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -singe lagoon
Storage lank of basin Primal microbial decomposition; Cl Boltoul or midlevel loading;
sill lace • Mixing while filling; ❑ 'yank covers;
• Agilaliun when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidatils
Sdtling Il;isin sin lace • Patiial microbial decomposition; ❑ Extend drainpipe outlets undemealh liquid
• Mixing while fillilig; level;
• Agilaliun when eugllying CI Remove settled solids regularly
Maimic. slurry of sledge • Agilaliun when spreading; ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
wicadct uullcls 0 Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader aRcr use;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
l lllcuvcicd illalullc, Volatile gas cmissiulls while ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sluuy or sludge on field drying 0 Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
sw laces
O Spread in lhiu uriiform layers fur rapid drying;
O Proven biological additives or oxidauls
Dead animals • C'nicass dccompusiliolt G1 Proper dispositiun of carcasses
Dead animal disposal C:alcass decumpusilioll ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial Ails;
1'il` ❑ I'rol:er'localioli/consliruetiou of disposal pits
Inciucialuls Incolnplele conihuslion ❑ Secondary stack burucrs
AAIt1C: - lluvembei 11, 1996, Page 4

Suurce Cause BR-li's lu Minimize Odor Silt 51100 Practices
Slanding walcr around 9 1111ploilcr lllainage;
(;rack and landscape such that waler drains
lacilO& Microbial decomposition of awry flum flcililics
inganic I nllcr
f+lalrule Uarkcel l+nk1 I'uulY nlaintahw(l access ruad5 Karol access road wnhaenancc - —
public 111.1115 fllllll latlll
Addilimud I111 linalioll : _ _ Available from .
<<ti IIIC Minnie Mana'�--cinvnt 11211t} itulelliMl' Packet NCSU, County I Mension Ccnlcl
Swiuc I'luduclion FalIn Polenlial Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAG I-acl Sheet NCSU- IlAI;
Swine I'luduetinn lWlily Mamllc Munngcmtllt: Pit Recharge - Uguun Tmahucnl ; EIJAE 12848 NCSU- "A1,
Swiuc t'lodlsclion Facilily Manulc Managcnlcnl: Underllonr F ush - lAgoun Trcalment ; FBAi: 129-83 NCSU - HAF-
I..rc= Design and MaImgnnem for l.ivcslock Mute Ifenin col and Skanc ; EBAG W343 NCSU - HAI:
U.Ililnalion of N1:r111ac aml Waslewaler Applicalion liquipincal ; EIJA1; Fact Sheet NCSU - 11A1;
(oamlling (Mms h nl Swine [buildings ; PUN33 NCSU - Swine Exiensian
Ia1Yi1nI1111e111a1 Asslnance I'1ogranl ; NVPC Manual NC Pwk 1'rodueas Assn
r llllions Or Rlauaging Odor ; a IgmI lion the Swhw Odur •[•ask Force NCSU Agri Coununuicaliuns
Moisance Concclns in Anirllal hlmn is MaMaganenl: Mrs and Pries; PROW, 1995 Conference Proceedings FlotkM Cu"malive Extension
ANIO( cinbet 11, 19116, Page

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
call«
unIl►s �o Control Insects — Site sllccitie III IdIce's
Liquid Systems
Flush (4111cls
Accunmialion of solids
el Mush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accummlaled solids from
/ glitters as designed.
L/l Remove bi-idging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lm-oulls and 1'ils
• ci listed Solids
In Maintain lagoolls, .icllling basins and pits witcle —
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
ciusting of solids to a depili of no more than G -
8 inches over more tbau AM of surface.
I,.Cccssivc Vegel-Illve
• Decaying vegetaliull
Maintain vegetative control almig battles of
( IUNVIII
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumuimion of decaying vegetative maller
along waters edge oil iiupoundinclit's perimeter.
Dry Systems
feeders
• Deed Spillage
CI Design, operate and niniulain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize (lie
+accumulation of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Jay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Sloiage ACCLI111tIIaliUdis of feed icsiducsM Reduce moisture accunrulalion within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bill for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
Inspect for and reinove or break up accumulated
solids in lihcr strips around feed storage as
needed.
AMIC - November 11, 1996. Page I

S,1Iii'CC Cause 11Ml's to COMM Insects Site Specific Pracfices
Aninial I lidding Aicas • Acciminhilions o1 animal ►vasles Elinihiate to►v areas [fiat trap moisluie along -
a1111 teed %vistage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disliubance by animals is
/minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to inininiize
accumulalions of wastes (i.e., insliccl for and
reinove or break up accumulated solids as
_ needed).
DI I NhumC I Iandlimg Accultmh iuns of minial ►vaslcs Cl Rcinove spillage on a iouliric basis (e.g., 7 - 10
SYSIClns day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during win(er) wheic manure is loaded fur land
applicaliun or disposal.
O Provide IUr adequate dminage mound manulc
stockpiles.
O Inspect for mid remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filler strips around stockpiles and
nlmmre handling areas as needed.
I-m 111ule infuinialiall colilact I11C Cooperative EXIC11sion Service, Ucpailincnl of Enlomology, Box 7613, With Carolina Slate Univcrsily,
Ralcigh. NC, 27695-7613.
AMIC *nibcr 11, 1996, Page 2

Mortality Manacement Methods
(check which method(s) are bein_, implemente:i)
G Burial three feet beneath the surface of the :round within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv tZowinv
stream or public body of water.
Renderine at a renderinz plant licensed under G.S. 106-165.-
Zi Complete incineration
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture Y
J Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
Duman or animal health. (Written approval of the Stare Veterinarian must be
attached)
Dece:nbe,- I ,). 1 yea(,

REVISIIIN DATES
DATE
5/04/93
p
09-02-93
06 - 23 - 93
DRAVN BY
Csu
05 - 27 - 93
FILE NUNS€
21693
05 - 05 - 93
CAC)PRODUCTS
CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PORTER FARMS
2000 SOWS (FARROW TO WEAN)
SCALE V a
so,
SHEET 0
2

Operator. Wayne Griffin County: CABARRUS Date: 05/25/93
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 750.0 feet (plus)
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
I
0 tows farrow to finish) x 1417 Ibs. 0 lbs.
0 sows farrow to feeder) x 522 Ibe. 0 lbs.
0 head flnlshin only) x 135 Ibe. 0 [be.
2000 sows farrow to wean) x 433 Ibe. a 868000 Ibs. 3
0 hood wean to feeder) x 30 lbs. .. 0 (be.
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) s 866000 Ibs.
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume - 866000 tbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW 1 CF/lb_ SSLW
Volume - 868000 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume 0.0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 450.0 feet : Inside top width 245.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 101.0 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet : Side slopes 2.0 : 1 (inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 100.00 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevatlon 87.0 feet
Total design volume using prismoldol formula
SS/ENDI SS/ENO2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 'LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 446.0 241.0 13.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH s WIDTH e
446.0 241.0 107,486 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF 130TTOIA
LENGTH * WIDTH
394.0 189.0 74,466 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH • WIDTH • 4
420.0 215.0 361,200 (AREA OF MIDSECTION • 4)
CU. FT. [AREA TOP + (4.AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] • DEPTH/6
107.486 361,200 74,466 2.2
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL w 1,176.829 CU. FT.
5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA.
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length • Width e
450.0 245.0 110.250 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length • Width
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA I10,250 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.

_ 1)3
0 lbs.
0 lbs.
0 lbs.
000 lbs.
0 lbs.
.000 lbs.
1DTH DEPTH
1.0 13.00
4)
• DEPTH/6
2.2
29 CU. FT.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure In CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume - 886000 Lbs. SSLW a CF of Waits/lb./Day • 180 days
Volume + 211997 cubic feet
58. Volume of wash water
This In the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for In Sk
Volume - 0.0 gallons/day • 180 days storage/7.48 gallons per CF
Volume - 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall In axes" of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount
180 days excess rainfall — 4.5 Inches
Volume — 4.5 in • DA / 12 Inches per foot
Volume - 41.344 cubic feet
5D. Volume of 25 year — 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.0 inches / 12 Inches per foot • DA
Volume d 55,125 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 211997 cubic feet
59. 0 cubic feet
5C. 41344 cubic feet
5D. 55125 cubic feet
TOTAL 308,466 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 1,174,466 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 1,176.829 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 886000 cubic fact
tr�
At elev. ' 93 feet; Volume is 866,593 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design v olume less 25yr-24hr storm is 1,121,704 cubic feet
9
ell ( 1- 6-,Xt elev. -�B;t�eet; Volume Is1 m i s] cubic feet (start pumping).
(�VAT
i
7. DESIGNED BY: Wayn Griffin APPROVED 9Y.
DATE.�jr3 GATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
II
This lagoon Is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with min. odor
I
ALL SURFACE OF
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be reached
AREA IMMEDIATE,
(permanent + temporary storage) may vary due to soil conditions flushing
DISK TO PREPAR
10138
operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed •6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume based on:
A CULTPACKER C
I BO days
1) waste from animals•. 2) excess rainfall after evaporation; and 3) the largest
AREA TO BE SE
24 hour (one day) rainfall that occurs on the average of once every 25 years.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be fairly
SEED MIXTURE;
constant throughout the year and from year to year. This estimate Is based on
Diume
excess rainfall which is equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months
APPLY THE POLL
circulate
excess in a yyear. The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider In an
annual pumpping cycle, but this storage volume must always be available. A
;
maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin pumping and this is
CF
usually the outlet Invert of pipe(s) from bullding(e). If the ouUot pipe is
�r
not Installed an this elevation to indicate when Pumping should begin.
SPECIFICATIONS
elevation must be established to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these
Clearing:
two elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit. such as
weather. soils. crop. and equipment in order to apply waste without runoff or
All trees and br.
amount.
leaching.
excavating or fii.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable method of
PP 9 P
foundation of th
stumps and roa:
disposal. Methods of application include solid not, center pivot. guns, and
minimum depth
I
traveling gun irrigation. Care should be taken when applying waste to prevent
debris. The fou
damage to crops and runoff.
I embankment ma
Il topsoil (3') and
The following Items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre --charged to 1/2
Cut—off Trench:
Its capacity to prevent excessive odors during start—up. Pre —charging reduces
Cut—off trench
the concentration of the Initial waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing
removing an uns
odor*. Solids should be covered with liquid at all times. When preehar ing
cut—off trench.
Is complete, flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should
not to be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This plan
Constructlon:
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment) before land.
Construction of
application• yyI
lines and grades
3. Begin um out of the lagoon when level reaches elevation 9R4 as
pump—outg
of the SCS. Ec
standing water.
marked by marker. Stop pump —out when the fluid level roaches
ahseps—foot roll,
sievatlan 7:t3 thlagi
Installed using t*
prevents the loafs of fa�rable bacteria). The design temporary storage. less
shall Include
25 year storm is 253.341 cubic feet or 1.894,987 gallons. As stated before
of .
when areas of L
thisvolumewill wry considerably from year to year.
excavated a mlr
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is one (1) inch and
with a SCS appr
information In tF
cubic feet
the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3 Inch per hour.
taken during ccr
,ing)
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the lagoon mowed
annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed to maintain a vigorous
Vegetation:
feet
stand.
6. Re air an eroded areas or areas damaged b rodents and established in
p Y g Y
All exposed erne
planned type of
9)•
vegetation.
seeding specificc
7. Ail surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable outlets.
S. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around waste
utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Woes will not be applied in
open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a residence or within 100 fee of
a well.
9. Ail permeable areas in the proposed lagoon area should be over excavated
and back filled with 1 foot of clay that is compacted in two-6 inch hits to
insure seepage does not occur. These areas should be compacted with a
sheepsfoot roller.
'
10, Waste is to be removed and applied to acres of fescue (astablished) and
eight acres of costal bermuda (to be established).
11. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohlbtts the discharge of pollutants into
waters of the United States. The Department of Envlronment, Health, and
Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management, ham the responsibillty
for enforcing this low.

SEEDING SCHEDULE
,dor ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE ALL DISTURBED
AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED. APPLY UME FERTILIZER THEN
DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH
A CULTPACKER OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT.
5st AREA TO BE SEEDED: 15.3 Acres
ire.
y SEED MIXTURE. 122.4 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS o B LBS./ACRE
an
APPLY 11iE FOLLOWING: 15.3007
LBS. OF OF 10-10-1
OM10 UFERTIU ETR0NS000 L S./ACRE)
is
nt SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
Clearing:
r All trues and brush shall be removed from the construction area before any
excavating or fill Is started. Stumps will be removed within the area of the
foundation of the embankment and fill areas and all excavated areas. All
stumps and roots exceeding one (1) Inch in diameter shall be removed to a
�t !J minimum depth on one (1) foot. Satisfactory disposition, wQI be made of all
debris. The foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material. Lagoon site (and pad site Is needed) to be stripped of
1` topsail (T) and stockpiled for use on dike and pad slopes (2-3•).
1 /2 I Cut—off Trench:
°s Cut—off trench shall be Installed as shown. Foundation to be prepared by
removing all unsuitable materials down to stable molls before excavating for
cut—off trench.
Construction:
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to the neat
lines and Ssrodeo as planned. Deviations from this will require prior approval
of the SCS. Earthfill shall be placed in max. of 6" lifts and not placed in
standing water. Compaction shall be performed by the construction equipment or
mheepe -foot roller during placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be i
Installed using the more Impervious materials. Construction of fill heights
shall Include FIVE (5) percent for settlement To protect against seepage.
° when areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to be
excavated a minimum of one 1) foot below grade and backfilled and compacted
ech and with a SCS approved material Us—CL.SC.CH). Refer to the Moll Investigation
information In the plans for special considerations. Precautions should be
taken during constructon to prevent excessive erosion and sedimentation.
mowed
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be seeded to the
in planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construction according to
seeding specifications sheet
Mt of
:ad
I i
d j �
Ity � i

1®111!
L GOON,1111
B OTT" E V . _
� 87. �
T6P OF QIKE=(\
�g;y 13�,►�m r-rFw
(VARIES IN FILL S CTIONS
AS SHO N HERE N)
lo
\ \
4500 0
\ \ 4
LL
106 TD '
f f
I f
I"
i�
-ri •r.nrn�..� - - �� i
'':
, i.14
--1

G RA -MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
T ►r^rrr1N tinlr r Sort.;,",
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE ROUTE 2. 80X 212
1919) 908.3232 MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
19191 908.3800
PORTER FARMS
CONCORD, NC
S2ecification Sheet
1. Acreage under traveler coverage ± 56 acres.
2. System is designed using a Kifco E30A Slurry Reel w/1000' of 3" ID PE hose,
hydraulic drive, and a Nelson SR150 Gun.
3. The Nelson SR150 Gun is intended to operate with maxir= ring orifice of
1.08 at 70 PSI, 197 GPM, with a diameter of 310'.
4. Lane spacing will be 230' (310' x 75%).
5. System pressure requirements:
Gun
1000' of 3" ID PE Hose
20' Elevation
2T00' 6" PVC Pipe (.11/100')
70 PSI
42 PSI
8.6 `PSI
2.31 PSI
122.91 PSI Pump Pressure
284 Head Feet
6. Friction loss in 6" PVC @ 197 GPM is .11 PSI loss per 100 feet.
7. Liquid velocity in 6" PVC Pipe is 2.25 feet per second.
8. The application rate will be a maximum of .36 inches per hour.
9. Gun Cart Travel Speed ( in/min.) = u 19.26 x GPM
Lane Spacing (ft.) x Depth of Application (in)
Travel Speed ( in/min.) = 19.26 x 197
230 x .36
Travel Speed ( in/min.) = 46 in/min.
3,83 ft/min.

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
COMPLETC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE ROUTE 2. BOX 212
19191 098.3232 MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
f919! 998-3800
10. The Kifco E30A Slurry Reel is capable of return speeds of 1 to 6.3 ft/min.
11. System pressure required is 123 PST @ 197 GPM. The Kifco NT120S engine
driven pump is capable of pumping flowes up to 500 GPM at pressures up -
to 150 PST. t
12. Brake horsepower required to operate pump is 40 Brake HP. The John Deere
4045D is rated at SO Brake HP @ 2200 RPM.
f
r

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: _Thomas E. Porter, Jr.
Address: 4455 Mt. Pleasant Rd S
Concord NC 28025
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE I -Field Specifications
county: Cabarrus
Date: 1-31--96
Field
Numbcr1
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
or Field3
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%j
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate 4
(inlhr)
!Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle4
(inches)
Comments
o
1
u
I .35
i
1
5
15.5
I GoC
I
I Fescue
I .35
I .95
6
I 17.0
I x B
I
IFescue
.40
I 1.6
I
I
I
I
I
7
I 4.2
I BaB
I
I Fescue
I .40
1.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
I 1.1
I BaB
I
Fescue
I .40
1.6
10
I 8.0
BaB
I Bermuda_ I
.40 I
1.6 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'Table to be completed in its entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Irrigation Parameters
October 1995
11
page-1
USDA -MRCS
North Carolina

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: Kifco Model E30A w/ Nelson SR150 Gun (1.08 ring nozzle)
Field No
and
Hydrant Nos
Travel
Speed
(fvmin)
Application
Rate
(inlhr)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (ft) Length (ft)
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(inches) @ Gun (psi) @ Reel (psi) Patterns
Comments
3,1
4 1
.35
230
480
310
1.08
70
112
270
3,2
4
.35
230
790
310
1.08
70
112
270
5,1
4
.35
230
860
310
1.08
70
112
270
5,2
4
.35
230
745
310
1.08
70
112
270
5,3
4
.35
230
940
310
1.08
70
112
270
5,4
4
.35
230
960
310
1.08
70
112
270
6.1
3.4
.40
230
1090
310
1.08
70
105
270
6,2
3.4
.40
230
1020
310
1.08
70
105
270
6,3
3.4
.40
120
660
180
1.08
70
105
270
10 lA
3.4
.40
230
745
310
1.08
70
105
270
10 1B
3.4
.40
230
545
310
1.08
70
105
270
eL L r
f'n2 a
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
2Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'tJse the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degree of arc in degrees.
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1996 page-2 North Carolina

TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field No'
and
Line Noe
Number or
Hydrants
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
Along Between -
Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
(inlhr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
(inches) @ Gun (psi) @ Hydrant (hr)
Comments
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
=Show separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in each field.
Irrigation Pararneters USDA -MRCS
October 1995 page-3 North Carolina

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
197
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
123
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
. 35 / . 40
Hose Length (feet)
1000
xxxxxxxx
Type of Speed Compensation
Mech.
xxxxxxxx
Prune Type (PTO, Englne. Electric)
Engine
Pump Power Regnirement (hp)
40 BPH
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications'
Desioner may Drovide thrust block details on separate sheet.
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK
AREA (sq. fL)
90' Bend
Dead F.nd
6
Tee
9
Hydrants
9
Drains
9
Ground Ent Z-Pi
'See USDA-NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-1313,
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1995 page-4 Forth Carolina

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: David _
Company: Gra—Mac Distributing Company
Address: 2310 NC Hwy 801 N Mocksville NC 27028
Phone: [phone]
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
b. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA -MRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD,
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the
designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval
of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip 25 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per DEHNR-DEM Code Section 15A NCAC 2B .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface
Waters.
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
October 1995 Page-6 North Carolina

Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1996 page-6 North Carolina

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE 2310 NC HWY. 801 N
Mob 990-3232 MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
19101 998.3300
NC TOLL FREE 1.600-422-3560
System Operation
Porter Farms
System Start -Up
1. Attach traveler to hydrant and pull out hose.
2. Move pump to lagoon.
3. Prime pump.
4. Start engine.
5. Leave engine at idle speed until all air is evacuated from system lines.
6. Raise engine speed to meet require pump pressure. (123 psi)
7. Start traveler motor.
8. Adjust traveler motor speed to reach required hose speed. (4 ft/min)
System Shut -Down
1. Lower engine speed to idle.
2. Shut off engine.
3. Move traveler to next location or to storage.
4. Move engine to storage after pumping.
Winterization
1. Open all drains in the system. (pipelines, pumps, traveler, etc.)
2. Open pump discharge gate valve and leave open.
3. Spray lubricant into pump suction and rotate shaft to help prevent
rust.
4. Open ground entry gate valve and pour in a small amount of anti -freeze.
5. Leave ground entry gate valve slightly open.
6. After water has been evacuated, close pipeline drains.
Maintenance
1. Follow all manuals supplied with the system.
2. Grease hydrant stems annually.
3. Replace any wore or damaged parts as soon as possible.

4045D
Performance Rating
Rated Gross Power ........... 85 bhp (63 kVV) @ 2400 rpm
Peak Torque ............. 217 lb.-ft. (295 N-m) ® 1200 rpm
Fuel Economy (BSFC) .. 0.345 lb/hp hr. (210 g/kW h) @ 1600 rpm
Continuous Rating
Gross Power ................ 78 bhp (58 kVV) p 2400 rpm
Peak Torque ............. 200Ib.-ft. (271 N-m) @ 1200rpm
RATED BHP is the0wer rating for variable speed and load applica-
tions where full power is required intermittently.
CONTINUOUS BHP is the power rating For applications operating
undera constant load and speed For long periods of time.
POWER OUTPUT is within + or - 5% at standard SAE J 1349
conditions.
PHOTOGRAPHS MAY SHOW NON-STANDARD EQUIPMENT
POWER
BrDEERE.
Performance Curve
Will
10 12 14 IG 10 20 22 24 25
En6me S peca—rpm's in S 00's

rt 4-
.50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
GPM
Performance and HP at full speed and full impeller dia.
(Input speeds = 540, 1000, 2000 depending on the gearbox ratio)
Increasing the speed on the angina driven pump to 2200rpm will
increase the pressure by 40 psi. Contact your local dealer or Kifco
for details of horsepower and performance changes.
FRT94/53 Pump Performance
300
250
PSI 200
150
100
20C
15C
HP i00
50
0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 -500 550 600 650
GPM
Curve A = Performanco and HP at full speed and full impeller dia.
(Input speeds = 540, 1000, 2000 depending an the gearbox ratio)
Curvo B = Performance and HP at 90% of full speed or at full speed with trimmed impeller.
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
I
600 S. Schrader Ave., P.O. Box 367, Havana, IL 62644
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
sevuue al aanwan pww frnpanmom phatm al machrm in Nix lu6at may not be -idenbcal to oaronlprod=on. The porlormamo nlarmation in : six teallet u bued on usn candWod urda a parMW !el al can&dww. ACWW field
puttmance wr rarr rrom dda data deponOV on YWUUI draanatanaes or pme, plus, waatnu. hvnan iAllmenl and a7sar taclen. Speafcaeau aN p-CAS are UAVC to drupe M Met naoce.
GK9502K5P
Printed in USA

1IQGUN° PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 24° TRAJECTORY"
100 T TAPER DORE NOZZLES
P.S.I,
Nozzle I
GPM DIA,
NaiS21e"
'S
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
.8•
GPM DIA.
Nazrle
.65'
GPM DIA.
Nottlo
GPM ,7" OIA.
Nozzle
.75"
GPM OIA,
Nozzle
A"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
GPM.BS" DIA.
Nozzle
GPM.9'
OIA,
No;tle
1,0"
GPM DIA.
401;.'-47rsis:t411B.L'3
6 {t
7 S• 230'.,;^'1A3'
z �0:�:,1S85a.,,;250.�
Its 256'
4.t O.iF
't52' 6,
rr
50
. 50 205,
64 215,
74 225'
07 235'
100 245'
130 265'
150 273'
165 200'
204 300'
70
,BO..
60 225'
zii.-L 23?I�"ac
75 238'
80 250'
103 263'
rvLT6 y�"`.�2234v
120 275'
136 283'
155 295'
177 302'
l97 310,
243 338'
90
68 245'
03 258'
100 270'
117 283'
135 295'
115 306'
175 315'
201 316'
223 335'
274 362,
7 00�
. u 72-.=b-S
`I
�SG1"a.
Erb — r� y'
;;;1.4�';;ti�'y305
i`3,16�
„g
76 265
7
92 276
111 290,
129 303,
150 315'
L , 71 324
195 335'
222 344'
247 355'
304 360,
Avadable only with 1`100 a -SR100.
100 R RING NOZZLES
100 DN DIFFUSER NOZZLES
PSI
.71 RING
GPM DIA
.77 RING
GPM DIA
.81 RING
GPM DIA
.06 RING
GPM DIA
.89 RING
GPM DIA
.93 RING
GPM OIA
.96 RING
GAM DIA
0.5 ON
GPM OSA
0.6 ON
GPM DIA
0.7 ON
GPM DIA
0.8ON
GPM OtA
.,�.Y.
40
T60ii
60
,'7o,�,:
80
790'w
100
1:10 `=
-.�:y+�:G+�'� a,'ti t
66 208
'e Z,r7A,s Z =
_01_235
,r89:6246'"r
94 255
79,:.�"'S.11.
105 270
1'10i 17
:ilwie"'
70 212
: A-M=.'
96 240
M—LiVZ-z-0
-111 265
27S i;SaS
124 280
30
'•
91 215`
32 A0�230
110 245
5715 60M
127 275
r
142 295
! . 3U,
,1;'.3�Y.J�.��i'aTii:
103 224
uWs1;15�,�2A0
125 260
M1.a5Z764�".=NO-j9U
145 285
of aai�5
162 305
6,M 51.7^10
y1r+'+aw�i►.e�:u".w
118 235
,129 i�250
141 270
w.1'E7—Tf
163 300
"..�7asaio
182 320
325 i
ii:t:.rer ry
134 238
731 180,y255 "
164 275
.,1295
189 305
2oi 315
2,2 125
222 r 335
l:ii':.�
152 242'
i—s87- -eb =
103 280
211 315
224 5a
236 335
tom, W44 s345
:r:•�' •
45 154
=60 0S:X
.1�1 ..:u.
66 168
179:
a`i:L�►'/.fiml% � �
91 182
}
lie 198
tMUjr0 -a=
110 200
t43 218
—
,r`
"The dlemotor 01 throw Is approylmslsly 3%1e83,or the 21' trajoetory, angle, 6% 1035 ror to
150 SERIES BIG.GUNS — 240 TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
P.S.I.
Nozzle
,7"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
.8'
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
'9"
GPM OIA.
Nozzle
1.0"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.1"
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.2"
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
1.3'
GPM DIA.
I.. ,:
60
'.70.�
''1 ` 0 . ';
. - . AO.i .a25
Ito 265'
r rt� .r}v O n '
i�s3Y. - 7 w
143 285'
:ia",*'185J ti'�
-+' .t_1�i�.'...29015-
182 305,
* 205 37D;,. i,t
ri:..4 .,.:ia X5',rs.
225 325'
t:.255 k� '330'•s S
,'.';:.,►� S,.wL'. .w.:.,a..
275 345'
"�,.;3004 .,r;
&`i
+4F:w35
Wi 380'
330 365'
J
80
7 aaT
100
�,,o�
126 290'
a:,,:ufasZ oti` a
143 3t0'
x ;�u,iSD�M_t3ffQd'iw
165 310'
210 335'
260 355'
�5' r
290 375'
315 375'
i:a53 93' ,w.4
355 400'
70�{1a:
380 395'
445 410'
3 2a3F
165 330'
ua
•" 222,u 45 r�.r:
235 355'
2a78�
Z 4G.
425 420'
500 440' ,
g .3gs
120
t57 330'
204 350'
250 375'
320 395'
385 a20'
465 440'
545 460'
150 R RING NOZZLES
P.S.I.
Ring
.8G
GPM DIA.
Ring
.97'
G�PPM� DIA.
Ring
1.08'
GPM 31A.
Ring
1.18"
GPM OIA.
Ring I
1.26"
GPM DIA.
Ring
1.34'
GPM OIA.
Rini
1,41
GPM DIA,
r.60.,-
60
0
--"!100.Uir 224 J'S
110 260,
:. 20'tL7'2i 1101=1
t .Mra 265.A�wiM
143 250,
I=i356""'y`290.r.KlcL
Y}i Ma1e1.6S'. A' ./1.
�;aeaes:,:�..,�:s,;zos3oo.
182 300,
fx7Ei afl ..-Tt'3Ta',.',�.`r'''
JI'"' h
225 315'
=75 X ,,.:�'
�iIR iw.r.V'
:.�,.a5s..:,:r,,.32a,t„i
275 335'
�a 29 a 33a" z
S7' 4: i7.iR!�..ri"I� l
�300,_..�
330 350,
i. r.,3� 1�#��'-
7:, r
.:..L,ia
385 365'
- 'o
00
128 280,
f MEZ?aa ffi
165 300,
210 320'
260 340'
315 360,
300 380'
445 395'
I
143 300'
:fsa ►3a�
185 320'
235 340'
290 360,
355 390,
425 400'
too
-120�
500 415'
{oa c�
• +7�So
,
20
=ro
120
157 315'
204 335
250 360,
380,
320 360'
305 400'
465 420'
545 435'
'The diamotor of throw is approximatoly 3% lass for the 21' trajectory angle.
200 SERIES BIG GUNS — 270 TRAJECTORY"
200 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzlo
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
Nozzle
1.05"
1,1'
1,2'
1.3"
1,4"
1,5'
1.6.
1,75"
1.9.
PS.1.
GPM pIA.
r GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA.
GPM OIA.
GPM OW
GPM DIA,
GPM OIA,
GPM pIA,
:a OOZ
-250 1�.345:{it
,
`.i3a:.13Q;:f:376'
355 395'
;365 :380':
415 410'..
'MS:u:.:4lO
� 480 430'
, d515� r`:430''"
555 450'
•755
70
270 360,
310 3",
630 465'
495,
990 515'
-Iita Z
=90`7
S8o7g=Xo - -
"=. W4s 430.,=
=$] 5=450. M
77690'l. j. 70 r
."'r.',825 =4W=
= ' • 1 :I
5
90
310 390'
350 410'
405 425'
475 445'
$ay 465'
625 485'
715 505,
855 535'
1005 555'
:f00„
3
{! •
5s�"A40 .„
' 00"I .,�,
r.=675+'s'..48G' :
«` .860 " SOGT :
"r.. 7G d�,;,fi
90C. h�
S4Y.
110
340 410'
390 430'
4a5 450'
525 470'
$05 495,
605 515'
790 535'
945 565'
1110 590'
ut20
�a.T355"t i
k+d'
;�.4eo' ,'
W.7,4 1i
e3b: sos
�i5 rsoo:s
.::c625�i48',?i':
,*'LABS eg'�£
1a-6 Box=
130
370 425'
425 445'
4B5 465'
$65 485'
655 515'
755 540'
860 560'
t025 590'
t2t0 620'
200 R RING NOZZLES
, 'G' Ring
0.29• actual)
PSI. GPM OIA,
1 ,A, Ring
0.46' actual)
GPM DIA,
141 Ring 1 %" Ring 1 jA' Ring 1 'A' Ring
(1.56' actuai) (1.66, actual) (1.74' actual) 083' actual)
GPM OIA. GPM DIA. GPM GIA. GPM DIA,
2" Ring
�1.93' actual)
PM DIA.
=1:s50'': r� 230 1
r "
4R0.
•. 43 ,
60• 250 340'
330 370'
385 390' 445 410' Sty a25' S05 440'
695 455'
r 70;ts�4Y,�27ar�3�5,.3'i�"'1a7,.a05��60;'i'.iZSSw'.`w"i+355;4�G'"�'�
Gz'nr�ab$5.
d$id17
00 290 370'
380 400'
a45 a20' 515 440' 590 455' B75 470'
wrk426 �2 5' W! .'i ii::. a 545 r� 55 S: �� 925: 470�, �• "i="•^'=,,,,7,11S6
005 490,
CBS S
too 325 399'
M{0IS. COOu 'i',dffS4
425 425'
39`:�i,"=626=455;
Boo a45' 575 465' 660 400' 755 500'
16076
900 520'
120 355 4!0'
130+'S:070?�{3.h.+43dU2665
545 465' 630 485' 725 500' 825 520,
985 545'
465 445'
"Trio diameter of thraw is approximately 2% loss loz the 24' trajectory angle, 546 less for trio 21' trajectory angle.
The CIIG GUN' performance data has boon oblainod undar idual Sa91 conditions and may bo adversely altotlud by wind, poor hydraulic onbanco conditions or other ,attars.
Nelson Irrigation Corporation maxos no rOprosenlaticn regarding droplet condition, uniformity, or application rate.

WOO
I I I
11
J

Ag-Rain Slurry -Reels are specifically
designed for the land application of
wastewater. These machines provide a
fast, economical way to spread liquid
waste. They are simple to operate,
require minimal labor and are easy to
adjust to the required depth of applica-
tion.
Slur Reel Advantages
and Benefits
Slurry -Reels are quick and easy to set
up and operate unattended. They can
apply liquid waste with superior unifor-
mity- to stationary gun systems.
Depending on the machine size, they
can spread the liquid over swaths up to
1/4 mile in length at a single setting.
The machines almost totally eliminate
the soil compaction problems associat-
ed with tank wagons. Slurry -Reels are
very portable and can easily be towed
from one location to another.
In addition to wastewater disposal, the
machines do an excellent job of irriga-
tion which makes it possible to turn
wastewater into a valuable asset.
Engine Drive Unit
Two styles of engine drive are used on
Ag-Raln Slurry -Reels. Both use a
Honda 5 HP OHV engine complete with
a large capacity fuel tank.
If the wastewater is free of solids, such
as partially treated or secondary lagoon
water, a turbine drive Water -Reel will
operate very efficiently. In these cases
a turbine is usually preferred for its sim-
plicity and reduced maintenance
requirement.
Slurry Pumps
A line of PTO Slurry Pumps are avail-
able for pumping wastewater. The
pumps have either an open or closed
vane impeller which is not easily
plugged by solids. A pedestal mounted
version is also available. Contact Ag-
Rain for more information.
Engine Drive Slurry -Reels
Model E40A Slurry -Reel
Model E30A Slurry -Reel
Model E21A Slurry -Reel

> "'Economical Wastewater Disposal Machines
E40A & E37A Hydraulic Drive
E30A, E25A & E21A Mechanical Drive
Low Profile Gun Cart.(GaIvan ized Body)
Crank -down Pressure Gauge &
Stabilizer Leg Protector
Hydraulic Drive
The E40A and E37A models are fitted with an engine powered,
variable displacement hydraulic transmission. To avoid over-
heating, the transmission is air cooled by a high capacity fan.
Through the transmission, the speed range is infinitely
adjustable and also speed compensated during operation. A
speed indicator displays the ground speed of the gun cart. The
speed is simple to adjust using Ag-Rain's unique system.
Mechanical Drive
The E30A, E25A and E21A models are fitted with a mechanical
drive. The speed is infinitely adjustable and speed compensated
during operation. A unique speed indicator displays the ground
speed of the gun cart and is simple to adjust.
Polyethylene Tube
The medium density polyethylene tube has a thick wall and is
especially made for the Slurry -Reel. It's built to resist wear, to
withstand repeated coiling and to resist the brittling effect of ultra
violet rays. It can be repaired with a screw -in mender or by weld-
ing. The tubing is backed with a 5-year pro -rated warranty.
Special Features
Ag-Rain Slurry -Reels include all the regular features you would
expect from a well designed traveler. A few of the special fea-
tures that makes Ag-Rain stand out from the crowd are:
4 A Fall Safe Shut -down System '
6 A Unique Anti -coast Brake
4 Retraction Speed Indicator
4 Speed Compensation on all models.
4 Eaton Variable Displacement Hydraulic Transmission
(E40A & E37A only.)
J Crank -down Stabilizer Legs (Except E21A)
Optional Low Profile Gun Cart reduces stream height
and wind drift.
4Turntable. - Rotates on heavy duty Ball bearing.
6 Pressure Gauge Protector
Regular Features Include:
Automatic Engine Shutdown Miswrap Safety Stop
Infinitely Adjustable Speeds Gun Cart Lift
Non -Ferrous Swivel Seal Foolproof Clutch
Supply Hose Honda 5 HP OHV Engine
Gun Cart Large Fuel Tank
Hose Guide Medium Density Polyethylene
Heavy Duty Chassis Tube
Nelson Slow Reverse Gun

,—a .
5 Models to choose from:
E40A.
4.0"
IID x 1250'
E37A.
3.7"
IID x 1050'
E30A
3.0"
IID x 1000'
E25A.
2.5"
IID x 800'
E21 A.
2.1 "
IID x 660'
Extra tube can be added
to most models.
Ask your representative
for details.
Row Crop Gun Cart with galvanized body is
standard equipment. An optional Low Profile
Gun Cart Is also available.
Nelson 150 Gun spraying dairy wastewater
Optional Equipment
Low Profile Gun Cart. Recommended to
reduce stream height and wind drift. (For
illustration see inside back cover.)
Pressure Sensitive Drive Shutoff.
Automatically stops the engine when the
supply pump is stopped.
PTO Shaft. To dry rewind the tube by
means other than the engine.
Performance Informatlon
Flow
M; ;ire
SPRINKLER
AREA COVERED
Model
GPM
P Psi f°
`�h
Pressure PSI
et d
IwL°i nn 'n.
E40A
300
97
70
371
316
1408
with
350
106
70
393
334
1417
NELSON
400
116
70
407
346
1423
SR2110R
450
138
80
429
364
1432
Sprinkler
500
150
80
443
376
1438
E37A
200
86
70
314
267
1184
250
94
70
329
279
1190
with
300
103
70
350
298
1199 .
NELSON
SR16oR
350
115
70
357
304
1202
Sprinkler
400
127
70
364
310
1205
450
141
70
371
316
1208
E30A
18o
94
50
300
255
1128
200
102
60
307
261
1131
with
220
120
70
321
273
1137
RNELSON
R1 OD
S00R
240
129
70
329
279
1140
Sprinkler
260
138
70
336
285
1143 ".
280
148
70
336
285
1143
E25A
80
75
60
229
194
897
100
82
60
243
206
903
with
120
92
60
257
219
.
909,
NELSON
SR100R
140
112
70
271
231
915
Sprinkler
160
124
70
286
243
921''
180
137
70
300
255
920
E21 A
60
67
50
214
182
751
70
82
60
221
188
754
with
80
89
60
229
194
757.
NELSON
SR100R
90
96
60
236
200
760'x.
Sprinkler
100
103
60
243
206
763
110
112
60
250
213
766._
CA�QVdb=4=2
600 S. Schrader Ave., P.Q. Box 290, Havana, IL 62644
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Performance shown in the above tables are based on clean water. Actual performance may vary
depending on the solids content of the wastewater being applied.
'Recommended width Is based on 85% of the wetted diameter. This width reduces the possibility of
excess application in the overlap areas. When using the machine for irrigation the recommended width
Is 70% of the wetted Me.
Specifications
E40A
E37A E30A
E25A
4.0
3.7 3.0
2.5
1250
1050 1000
800
9240
8240 4310
2500
16520
13120 7280
4200
11 Lx15
12.5Lx15 9.5Lx14
6.70x15
Model
PE tube I.D. (in.)
PE tube length (ft.)
Dry Weight (lbs.)
Weight with water (lbs)
Tire Size
Shipping dim.: (ft. in.)
Length
Width (8-3" w/o wheels)
Height
E21A
2.1
660
1780
2700
4.8002
18-0 18-0 13-5 11-8 9.8
'9-10 '9-0 7-5 6-9 5-10
12-8 11-4 10-0 7-11 6-10
Because of 9 product improvements, photos of machines in Ws IeaW may not De identical to current producW. The performance inlamaoDn in ft leaflet is based ant tease eortduCW under a peniadar set of conditions.
Ach" net Wormence may vary from dus data depending on vanaphi Cr0.lmStmes of time, dace, weather, human judgement and other faeiais. Speoficahons and prices are subjeq to Charge without notico-.
GKMSR-U printed in U.SA.