020013_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Water Resources
Environmental .Quality
November 7, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David W. Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
F�LFRQY COOPER
j Governor
MICHAE177 S- GAN
Secretary
LWDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2017-PC-0695
I SA N.C.A.C. 2T ,1304
Chapman Farms/Facility 02-13
General Permit AWCO20013
Alexander County
Dear Mr. Chapman:
On September 29, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected Chapman Farms and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure. to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of
the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit Condition III.5, II1.11, and II1.12,
and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after)
of the date of application in accordance with the permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action,
please submit a written response to this Notice by November 21, 2017. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources Water Quality Regional operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 Fast Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

Chapman FarmstFacility 02-13
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
November 7, 2017
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue a civil penalty
assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
1
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
ericlosure`"Compliance-Inspection'Reportdated-September 29, 2017 -"- - -- -- - -- �- - -
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E-Mail
Alexander Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWCO20013
Regional Permit File AWCO20013
jb

Facility Number: 020013
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for visit: Routine
Region:
Incident 0
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCO20013 Denied Access
InartivA Or Clnsert Data,
Mooresville
828-632-3129
Mailing Address: 280 Chapman Farm Ln Taylorsville NC 28681
Physical Address: 280 Chapman Farm Ln Taylorsville NC 28681
County: Alexander
Date of Visit: 09/29/2017 Entry Time: 03:30 pm Exit Time: 4:30 pm
Farm Name: Chapman Farms
Owner- David W Chapman
Owner Emall:
Phone:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 56' 40" Longitude-. 81° 12' 41"
From the intersection of NC 90164 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church
Rd. The farm is on the right.
Question Areasc. _ — - -- — - — - .
Dischrge a Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David W Chapman Operator Certification Number: 20927
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative David W. Chapman Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector. James
Inspector Signature:
Secondary inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
09/14/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.58 Lbsm000 Gallons
04/18/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.88 Lbsl1000 Gallons
03/27/17 > Soil Analysis
Phone: [phone] Ext
Date: '�
21. Failure to conduct Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application; NOV to follow.
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWCO20013
Owner- Facility : David W Chapman
Facility Number.
020013
inspection Date: 09/29117
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow
250
192
Total Design Capacity:
250
Total SSLW:
350,000
waste Structures
Disignated
Observed
Type identifier
Closed Data start Date
Freeboard
Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 18.00 4&00
Wet Stack WET STACK
page: 2

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 09I29117 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit! Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
[]
❑
[]
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
[Is
❑
2. Is there,evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
01113.
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No No Me
A. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
Cl
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures track adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable.
❑
A ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑01111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 101Y6110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWCO20013
Inspection Date: 09/29/17
Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yee Na Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Com (silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat, eadey,
oats)
Crop Type 4
Timothy, orchard, & Rye
Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6 _
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Mane ementPlan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility tack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly. Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
00130
❑■❑❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■❑
❑
Yee No No No
❑ ❑ ❑
page: 4

Permit: AWCO20013
Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 09/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Records and Docum&
Yo"Q
Na No
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ M ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26: Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
- M. ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
1113011
Other Issues
YW-No
Na Na
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fall to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

DIvls"Ion of
Facility Number O®- a Division of Sail and Water Conservation �� l
Q Other Agency t
Type of visit: IWCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 'Arrival Time: Departure Time: ounty: A aT4 Region:
Farm Name
Owner Nam
Mailing Add
Physical Ad+
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
V Certification Numbe L��*ta
L
ertification Number
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Gurrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle ' r Capacity .r
Wean to Finish
Layer
ai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
airyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow. to Feeder
D . P,ault
Ca acl
Pop.
Non-DaiKy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
10ther
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑Nw=aPFA NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)] Yes [:]No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes !&a. -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any imme at the i tegrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site'which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
4VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA r] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes <!�o
NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes '�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improve
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Ye No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Kind Drift ❑ Application Outside of pp Area
� % F
12. Crop Type(s): C
13. Soil Type(s):
I 8�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
, . ❑ Yes
❑ NA.
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes N
❑ NA
❑ NE'• .
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all compo cots of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. /
'UP hecklist4 ❑ Design Ermaps ease Agreements
❑Other:
21. es record keepingg nerovement? If yes, c ropriate box below: ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Ye,kly Freeboard a Analysis Soil Analysis a Transfers �'v4e ther Code
❑ aall ekingop Yield 20 cctions ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
L
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Pace 2 of 151 Condnued

1 racili Number: JDate of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes o ❑ NA NE
25. Is the f ility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] No NA ❑ NE
th ropriate box(es) below.
F ' e to complete annual sludge survey �ilure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes_QNo A�__R ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to prope is ose ' a s with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Ye9AED$Q7 ❑ NA
❑ Ye ❑ NA
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
Comments (refer to question i s Explain any, YES answers.and/or any additional` iecominendations or any other comments:
Use drawiags.of facili to better explain situationi(use additional pages as necessary).
LIry
Z. t
03l9_7 ti
l
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

..ECEIVE tNCpENRiDWR
NOV 2 9 2017
WQROS
MOORESVILLE rEt31ON-AL OFFICE
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
November 7, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David W. Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsvilie, NC 28681 .
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2017-PC-0695
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Chapman Farms/Facility 02-13
General Permit AWCO20013
Alexander County
Dear Mr. Chapman:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretor,
LIlVDA CULPEPPER .
Interim Director
On September 29, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected Chapman Farms and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 1 SA North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of
the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit Condition III.5, III.11, and III.12,
and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after)
of the date of application in accordance with the permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition. to the• specified corrective action,
please submit a written response to this Notice by November 21, 2017. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quaf ity ! Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations

'" *+".+
A F�LIE
KU
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
David W. Chapman
Chapman Farms
280.Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Dear Mr. Chapman:
September 9, 2015
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Chapman Farms/Facility 02-13
General Permit AWCO20013
Alexander County
On June 29, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected Chapman Farms and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 29, 2015
jb
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nrdenr.gov
An Equal Opporwnity 4Af anal Action Employer —Made in part by recycled paper

MI
0
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 020013 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
oats of Visit: 06/29/2015 EntryTime: 02.00 pm
Farm Name: Chapman Farms
Owner:
David W Chapman
Active
permit: AWCO20013 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Cinsed Date:
County: Alexander Region:
Exit Time: 3:30 pm Incident#
Mooresville
owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 280 Chapman Farm Ln Taylorsville NC 28681
Physical Address: 280 Chapman Farm Ln Taylorsville NC 28681
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 56' 40" Longitude: 81° 12' 41"
From the intersection of NC 90164 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church
Rd. The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David W Chapman
Operator Certification Number: 20927
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative David W. Chapman
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Jame B
Phone: [phone]ExI
Inspector Signature:
Date: �
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
01/08/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.66 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/25/14 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.86 Lbs11000 Gallons
04/24/15 > Soil Analysis
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 06/29/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 250 237
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 19.00 36.00
Wet Stack WET STACK
page: 2

tV
Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 06/29/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ng
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storago & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea Ng Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Y
Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 06/29/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Aanlication
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Sail Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na_Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Cl
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 4

N
Permit: AWCO20013• Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 06/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Nit —No
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes No N"e
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

� Ai�A"1� +�' s a � � �,+s , L •�Fa `» � � ', .: " � �.. 'Y' ii_ � � � .. � 7 s 1 � � e .s�' � A 'ZF+.• r_rdl� < E � �!r ' Sf P \ :. �
<� _A • l 1 � \� �� � -� r 1 t � ,, 1 ! 1 I I 1 i yl'�y 1 �i .. R /{
' S^'Z..gw' ,hr ,_ e� ';' -'•�. `�` Yr'�� {- 7,t. r• ;�,��" r -s. ``s ��.Ei '+. r�@3-`.r� a4,:7 '$`' om !/'
•i5`ci 4"b' �6 Pr "'' .sae M .:,.Ai „' ` .'I nil i .
Reason for Visit: Gf'Routlne Q Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time: Departure Time: �K ounty: Region:
Farm Name: Cl� Po����/V`,�— Owner Email:
Owner Name: ���-� dv C hone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
t� a'-OW�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Form:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number: ��
Longitude:
t
Y.� --^ W. .t •'_
X # T ♦
1
,
.:
t,. _ T
k
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment �4
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Ye �No[� NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ N NA [] NE
Structurg 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Struc
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [] Ye ❑ NA FINE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentplitweat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, se acks, or compliance alternatives that need
Yesy
Q NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L] No M. NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. [3 Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop WWiindlow` ,- ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Ap oved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ��` �` C
a'3 f�;�
13. Soil Type(s): cf"__1_k__v !'� '`'Lj l`!_/ Z�s
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reguired Records_ & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the
Hcate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
`A,'� �Y�.
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA [] NE
r -
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o [] NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP 1 e Agreements
2l . Do record keeping need im rovement7 if yes, propriate box below. 1
ast pplication Weekly Freeboard Analysis Soii Analysis
❑ R infall ❑ S�,c g Crop Yield l ttte-Insnect� inns® Mnnthl3c..anr� 1 " R A;
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Y+� o A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NAB�❑ NE
n Wd thrr Code
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA [] NE
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: D C �VE;
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes)R&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes [:]No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NoI NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose o� with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher t an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. &V
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the'appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes %No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes TO
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments {re#er to question,#} Explain any, YES answers y y.
rs: and/or;an additional recommendations or an o
comments
a
TJse�drawint;'saf facility &better'exnlain"situations.(use addjtional�oa�es'iii-necessarY):
_
`r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

K?'. . r;0.
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
March 23, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David W. Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
PAT CRORY �- 1= Govemor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Sectwary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2016-PC-0100
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Chapman Farms/Facility 02-13
General Permit AWCO20013
Alexander County
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Director
0
On February 17, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water,
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected Chapman Farms and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of
the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit Condition 1II.5, III.11, and III.12,
and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after)
of the date of application in accordance with the permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action,
please submit a written response to this Notice by April 15, 2016. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality j Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operatious
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 29115
704 663 1699

Chapman Farms/Facility 02-13
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
March 23, 2016
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue a civil penalty
assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely, .
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated February 17, 2016
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E-Mail
Alexander Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWCO20013
Regional Permit File AWt020013
IS

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 020013 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 02/17/2016 Entry Time: 04:00 pm Exit Tlmo
Farm Name: Chapman Farms
Owner: David W Chapman
Permit: AWCO20013 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Alexander Region: Mooresville
5:30 pm Incident 0
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 280 Chapman Farm Ln Taylorsville NC 28681
Physical Address: . 280 Chapman Farm Ln Tayforsville NC 28681
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 58' 40" Longitude: 81° 12' 41"
From the intersection of NC 90164 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church
Rd. The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David W Chapman Operator Certification Number. 20927
Secondary OIC(s).
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman
Phone : [phone]
On -site representative David W. Chapman
Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: James eal
Phon63-1699 E+�ad�
Inspector Signature
Dat �1�0
:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
01/08/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.66 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/25114 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.86 Lbs11000 Gallons
04124/15 > Soil Analysis
21. Failure to conduct Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application; NOV to follow.
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W.Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 02/17/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 250 235
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Dlalgnated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Vaste Pond WSP 18.00 20.00
Vet Stack WET STACK
page: 2

0
Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 02/17/16 • Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharags & Stream „Impacts
Yee No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
s ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
[]
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment
Yes No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
[]
If yes,'is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste. management or closure plan?
7. Do any.of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M00
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by.the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other titan the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ARRlication
lies No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number:
020013
r
Inspection Date: 02/17/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yee No Na Me
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain {Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye
Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[IN ❑
❑
_Records and Documents
Yee o Na_N%
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
N ❑ Cl
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility : David W Chapman Facility Number:
020013
Inspection Date: 02/17/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yap
No Na No
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?.
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
[]
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fait to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑.
❑
❑
26. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ■
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Cl
❑ E
❑
Other Issues
Ym
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or 11011 ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewhnspection with on -site representative? ❑ E ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 11011
❑
page: 5

RECEIVEDINCDENRIDWR
n APR 13 2016
WQR
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
/!�iv►clwmls on. PrA Ede..
teem +GS��"
r &b h c Gr x ► i� !r1 ,�lD%�r �G a f �► �1 . f. k
►v4 tt h r ! ls9A s tG r %t
a.Ar.,::14 r
ej
41_ fir I'C 416W p f/e A -f A
r s-2—!J Z-13
st
fGr•k; qwG

PAT MCCRORY
Gnvcmor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
March 23, 2016 +011r
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David W. Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2016-PC-0100
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Chapman Farms/Facility 02-13 ,
General Permit AWCO20013
Alexander County
Dear Mr. Chapman:
On February 17, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected Chapman Farms and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are.hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as'follows:
Violation I:
Failure to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of
the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit Condition I1I.5, II1.11, and 1I1.12,
and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after)
of the date of application in accordance with the permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action,
please submit a written response to this Notice by April 15, 2016. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance —
Reason for Visit: *Routine O Complaint' O FoUgw-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: a [ Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:%4!4
Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:`'�'��
Back-up Operator:
' Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Desl p Curre t e i Csurre t Designrrept 4
Sw ' y{yyC,g�yayp{� ci ap. oultry aei op. Cattle ` Capacity(7yPo "a
Wean to Finish Layer,
Wean to Feeder Non -Layer ry
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
e gn enDry
Farrow to Feeder
w Farrow to Finish La ers
Gilts Non -La ers
;y
Boars Pullets • i
f� Turkeys
Turke Poults `
Other Other z71
s}�: rY-^,.rv� , °+-: �..,:..n .. , ♦ ,b•�: �.:. �_v.,��. �.x�� :+e+s r®r v}wc. � ., ti! . -i
Cow
Dai Calf
Dai Heifer
Caw
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
BBeeeef Feeder
f Brood Cow
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yesie--� ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at. ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste managementW system? (If yes, notify DR) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
"3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye o ❑ NA CD NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/20I4 Continued A
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yesie--� ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at. ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste managementW system? (If yes, notify DR) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
"3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye o ❑ NA CD NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/20I4 Continued A

jFacilq Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes L._1 U ❑ NA NE
1' a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: `
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): "
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?] Yes ❑ NA. ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or envirc ental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑y
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 01
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > l0% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus _ ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Appro ed
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [D NA [] NE
Required Records & Documents TT�
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ NA] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps 0 Lease Agreements [:)Other-
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Y o [�NA �E]NE�
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspec ❑ Sludge Survey
. 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ycs'onsfo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
- - 4 _.el 2,14/20 4 Continued

�Faeffity Number: - Date of Inspection:
' 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ���.Yes o ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate.box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes— ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT)
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animal with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
� an norm and report mortality rates that were al?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes\Q90"❑ NA
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the jYeso
❑ NA
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ NA
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems not which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Ye❑ NA
33.'Did the-Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Y Flo -❑ NA
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
d� — eft", !
61 ME
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ YT\D,AiS ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412014 `�'

Type of Visit: 4P Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O.Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 02Departure Time: County: -T ` Region:
Farm Name: Z�_ k 1 '�\ WOV�\ S Owner Email:
Owner Name: v Va` hone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: 4:�' `J V y_y� 1 �� Certification Number: 2
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
"`"'�� q�.� -.� � ��.
r� � 1 �•�"q +s°",� x T v V'�
P}y� ' 1
�:� ��
�i l,� }`Y3�,;e^'i.�. '� ��)
� �.
Or
to
Dischars and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes <No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
[] Yes [] No .�1A ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued
-1

� ss�
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection;
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o[:] A ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA E
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Struc
Identifier: 4p&*,A
Spillway?: �---
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the int�e of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 5��ff
NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) '��
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes_.�11f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? '�
Waste Application
l0. Are there any require u ers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes DleJ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crap Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops -differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes IQXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 36a:50 0 NA [3NE
;Zo18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N ❑ NE
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit rea I y avai a le? es o NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
r ❑ Q-Lease rt ens ❑Other:
21. D record keeping need i ovent? If yes, check the appro a box below.r,i
❑ NA i E
52infall
pplication We�ekl;board a Analysis ❑ So' alysiser Code
ocking p Yield nute Inspections onthly and 1" Raifudge Sury
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? A [] NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility ail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?�❑ Yes'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facil' out of compliance with permit conditions related to ge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
��❑ No ❑ NE
the app priate box(es) below.
❑ ilure to omplete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non- mpliant sludge levels in any lagoon
t structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �Wo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
----------- &
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations.as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, ove - pp tcation)
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes do ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer -to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use.dravvirs of facility to Better explain situations (use additional pales as necessary). _.
C�
�. $ �CN
cl�
a 2y/�S
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3
21412011

M �- o
Chapman Dairy Farm
Bill Chapman -)3
280 Chapman Farm Lane Od
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Facility No. 02-13
Alexander County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0.0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
250 Dairy Animals
In Cooperation with the
Alexander Soil and Water Conservation District
NC DENR, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
USDA, Natural Resource Conservation Service
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
AQUIFFR'PROTFC'T]ON 9PCTION
MAR 2 0 2009

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Chapman Farms
David William Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
828-632-3129
03-05-2009
This plan has been developed by:
Lee J. Holcomb
Alexander Soil & Water Conservation Distric
3741stAvenue SW
Taylorsville, NC 28681
828-632-0638
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
ilo �Zt 4-- �) ,
2-
Signature (owner)
Date
eivam-a-�
3 r -
IV
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical pecialist Signature Date
. -
---. --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •------------•------------
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-05-2009 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED I DENR 1 DWQ
AQUIFFR,PP0TFr.Tj0N SECTION
MAR 2 0 2009

Narrative
Chapman Dairy Farm
Bill, Daniel, & Gary Chapman
The Chapman Dairy Farm is permitted for 250 Jersey cows, but currently manages less than the
permitted threshold. This Waste Plan assumes a dairy operation with 250 head of Jersey milk
cows,
Refer to the aerial photo of the dairy operation for familiarity with the waste storage pond and
drystack. The waste storage pond is located at the dairy headquarters where the lot runoff, milk
parlor wash water, and silage leachate are captured. Under the Location Maps tab in the folder
there is a diagram showing the routing of PVC pipe to collect the liquid waste. The waste
storage pond is approximately 76'W x 154'L x 9'D, and has a storage capacity of at least 90
days. The liquid waste from the storage pond is irrigated with a solid set gun on fields 1, 2, and
3 of Tract 1659. The solid waste is scraped onto a concrete stacking pad and either hauled to the
drystack-or land applied on the waste application fields. The drystack also has an approximate
storage capacity of 90 days. The litter from Gary's chicken houses is also utilized on cropland
and hayland. Refer to the map of Tract 9643 to view the location of these houses. The litter is
cleaned out at least once per year and stored in a separate drystack, near the chicken houses, or
land applied on the waste application fields.
Crop Notes
This plan is set up for a two year cropping system, but some systems with grass for pasture or
hay may last 8 years or longer depending on rainfall and levels of management. The Chapman
Dairy plants matua (rescuegrass) on Tract 1659, Field 2. N.C. State University did not have
yield records for matua at the time of updating the plan. The method used for the RYE was
taking farm records from the dairy and coming up with an average expected yield in tons/acre.
Also, there was no yield data for small grain silage on a Chewacla-Piedmont Soil Series in the
Nutrient Management Software. It appears this was a typographical error in the Standard
Database, as it showed 0 tons for the yield. After comparing similar soil series such as
Riverview, the planner input 10 tons/acre for the silage yield. For the dairy record keeping,
continue to use the listed PAN amounts for the crop and field.
The main two year crop rotation in the plan is Small Grain Silage, Soybeans, Manured, Double
Cropped, and Corn Silage. On some fields Forage Sorghum for Silage or Annual Ryegrass for
Hay/Pasture is planted. As part of record keeping, the amount of PAN applied will need to
correspond to which crop is planted that particular year. The Chapman Dairy cuts small grain
(wheat, barley, or oats) both for silage and grain. The N rates are the same for barley -grain,
wheat -grain, and small grain silage. Therefore, there is no need for any N reduction since the
PAN is the same. The dairy will need to make the decision and then document on the waste
record keeping forms which harvesting method was chosen. If small grains are grown for a
cover crop, only 30 lbs: of PAN can be applied, and that amount must be deducted from the next
crop.

Crop Notes, cont'd
A similar situation applies for fields that the Chapman Dairy rotates back and forth between
pasture and hayland. Waste should be applied to the fields at the lesser N rate for pasture, unless
documented by the manager that those fields are being harvested for hay.
Animal waste can only be applied to land that will be harvested. In the event of crop failure after
animal waste has been applied, replant another crop that can use the nutrients.
The PAN for crops following soybeans must be reduced by 20 lbs. to account for the nitrogen
carry over. If Alfalfa is grown, the PAN would need to be reduced by 80 lbs. for the next crop.
Note to the managers' reviewing the waste plan — There are instances where the recommended
amount of Nitrogen per acre is not applied at the full rate when reviewing the Waste Utilization
Table. This is because the software shows how much waste is applied during a calendar year.
For example, small grain silage has waste applied at planting in October or November, and then
applied again the next spring. Take a look at the Waste Utilization Table and get familiar with
the tables.
The source used for Gary's chicken houses is for Broiler Breeder Whole House Litter. This is
the closest "standard" source that is similar to the waste analysis reports reviewed from Gary's
chicken houses. Once there are at least three years of waste analysis reports, a user defined
source will then be used instead of the standard source shown in this updated plan.
Note to DWQ & DSWC reviewers of the waste plan — The litter from Gary's two chicken
houses are applied to: Tract 9343, Fields 1 & 2.
Tract 9640, Field 4
Tract 9643, Fields 1 & 2
These are the designated fields where the chicken house litter is shown to be applied. However,
the dairy will apply the chicken house litter to different fields in the waste plan other than those
stated above. If different fields are used for the chicken house litter, then the managers' should
make note on the waste record keeping forms and make sure not to apply above the listed PAN
for that particular field and crop. The same applies if using two sources on one particular field.
This method of developing the waste plan is more beneficial in keeping the waste utilization
table organized and easier to review.
2

Animal Waste Sources
UI Chapman Farms - Liquid Manure Slurry
250 milk cows produce 340,303 gals of liquid manure slurry with 178 lbs. of PAN.
See Chapman Dairy waste storage pond designs for support information on manure
volume and storage available.
See User Defined Worksheet for concentrations used in Nutrient Management Software.
SI —Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid Waste
500 milk cows produce 4,250 tons of Manure per year and 18,275 lbs of PAN.
S24 -- Broiler Breeder House Whole Litter
20,000 pullets produce 480 tons of Litter per year and 6,696 lbs of PAN.
Special Notes
Waste Storage Pond Capacity: Waste Storage Pond — 45,495 ft3 or 340,303 gals.
Drystack or Waste Storage Structure -- ft3
9

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
Ul
Chapman Farms - Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 340,303 gals/year by a 250
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
196
Incorporated
268
Injected
303
Irrigated
178
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied 0bs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
178
3900
-3,722
7,436,391
-7,096,089
Year 2
178
5218
-5,040
9,950,351
-9,610,049
S 1
Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 4,250.00 tons/year by a 250 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
18275
Incorporated
24225
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
18,275
64590
-46,315
15,020.65
-10,770.65
Year 2 1
18,275
71167
-52,892
16,550.361
-12,300.3-6
----------i- ----- -- -- -- ------------------so—u'-----------------•---- ------------- --- -----------•----------• -----••-------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
" Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-05-2009 Source Page 1 of 2

S24
Broiler Breeder House Whole Litter waste generated 480.00 tons/year by a 20,000
animal Broiler Breeder House Whole Litter operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
6696
Incorporated
8779
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
6,696
10444
-3,748
748.72
-268.72
Year 2
6,696
12431
-5,735
891.14
-411.14
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AGA39-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
-------------------- ---------------- ----- -------------------------------------------- -s------ ------------•-----------•--------.--------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
" Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-05-2009 Source Page 2 of 2

fie table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
ield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1324
1
9.30
9.00
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 be.
Corn, Silage
17.4 Tons
1325
l
13.40
12.70
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
1325
2
18.50
18.20
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
1325
3
13,90
13.80
15.0
Riverview-P
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
1325
5
10,50
9,30
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
1325
6
5.90
5.40
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
1336
01
14.60
14.00
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
1336
02
4.30
4.30
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
1350
2
10.50
10.50
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
1350
3
1 1.60
1.60
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
1387
1
5.20
4,70
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
1 10.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
1391
2a
3.60
3.60
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
Corn, Silage
17.4 Tons
1391
2b
3.50
3,50
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
1391
3a
7.60
7,20
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
83 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
1391
3b
8.901
8.90
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
1391
4
2.30
2.20
- 15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/5/2009
PCS Page 1 of 5
NOTE. Symbol " means user entered data.

Planned Craps Summary
Tract .
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Cam, Silage
19.6.Tons
1492
1
2.901
2.70
15.0
IPacolet
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
1492
2
5.50
5.00
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
1576
1
6.30
6.30
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
1589
l
2.401
2.40
15,0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
1589
2
3.75
3.50
15.0
IPacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3 Tans
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
1590
1
5.60
5.50
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
Com, Silage
18.4 Tons
15 11
1
6.001
5.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu
Cam, Silage
21.2 Tons
1591
2
3.90
2.90
15.0
jCecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10A Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
Cam, Silage
•21.9 Tons
1659
1
10.20
10.20
15.0
Cecil
Annual Ryegrass - Hay
3.8 Tons
Annual Ryegrass - Pasture
3.8 Tons
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6 Tons
1659
2
9.40
9.40
15.0
Pacolet
Rescuegrass Hay
•3.0 Tons
Rescuegrass Pasture
*3.0 Tons
1659
3
5.20
5.20
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10. I Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Cam, Silage
21.2 Tons
1659
4
13.50
13.50
15.0 lPacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
1659
5a
3.90
'3.70
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
1659
5b
3.40
3.40
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
1659
6
14.00
12.90
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
1659
8
5.101
5.001
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
1659
9
2.50
2.50
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/5/2009
PCS Page 2 of 5
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1748
1
12,50
11.60
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
I801
1
8.401
7.40
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
1801
2
6.60
5.50
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
1876
1
1,30
1.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
1876
2
6.30
5.50
15,0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
1876
3
2.00
1.70
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
43 Tons
1876
6
8.90
8.90
15,0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
1876
9
3,00
3.00
15.0
Cecil
small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
1886
1
6,801
6.80
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
30.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
41 bu,
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
1938
3
15.30
14,80
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
1938
4
23.801
22.50
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
1956
1
3,90
3.90
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.2 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
Corn, Silage
16.0 Tons
1956
2
2.00
1.80
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
2112
01
4.501
4.50
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
Corn, Silage
17.4 Tons
2112
02
2,60
2.40
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
2112
02a
4,50
4.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2112
03
4.00
4.00
11.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10,0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu,
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
2112
04
3,90
3.90
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
2112
05
8.00
8,00
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4. I Tvns
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/5/2009
PCs Page 3 of 5
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
2112
06
12.70
12.70
15.0
Pacolet
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
2130
1
5.201
3.70
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
9342
1
22.40
21.00
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
Corn, Silage
17A Tons
9343
1
17.40
17,40
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.6 Tons
9343
2
4.10
4.00
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.2 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
Corn, Silage
16.0 Tons
9640
4
7.701
7,70
15.0.
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
9641
1
15.50
15.50
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
9641
2
4.10
4.00
15.0
Pacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
9641
3
2.30
2,30
15.0
Riverview-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
11
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
9642
2
2.70
2.00
15.0 lPacolet
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
Corn, Silage
19.0 Tons
9643
1 1
15,30
15.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
9643
2
10.10
8.90
15,0
Pacolet
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
PLAN TOTALS,. 484.95 464.40
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/5/2009
PCs Page 4 of 5
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

LI
. Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
2
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone,
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding rapacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered, Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/5/2009
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCS Page 5 of 5

The 1 Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization , .or this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number o s of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The'plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by thecrop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
I Soil Scries
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appliic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Qbs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Obs/A)
Res.
GWA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied 1
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
I324
1
SI
Pacolet 1
930
9.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
52
0,00
12.14
0.00
109.25
1324
1
Sl
Pacolet
9.30
9.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crap
30 bu.
4119/15
I l7
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
27.21
0.00
244.$8
1325
1
SI
Pacolet
13.40
12.70
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
811-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
182
0.00
42.32
0.00
537.53
1325
2
SI
Pacolet
18.50
18.20
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
27,91
0.00
507.90
1325
3
SI
Riverview-P
13.90
13.80
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
150
0
0
Broad.
150
0.00
34.88
0.00
481.39
1325
5
S I
Pacolet
1 OS0
9.30
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
281,16
1325
6
S!
Pacolet
5.90
5.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0,00
27.91
0.00
150.70
1336
01
SI
Pacolet
14.60
14.00
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
423.25
1336
02
S1
iverview-P
4.30
4,30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad,
57
0.00
13.25
0.00
57.00
1336
02
Sl
Riverview-P
4.30
4.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
0.00
32.56
0.00
140.00
1350
2
S!
Riverview-P
10.50
10.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
60
0.00
13.96
0.00
146.51
1350
2
SI
Riverview-P
10.50
10.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
361.39
1350
3
S 1
Riverview-P
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
60
0.00
13.96
0.00
22.33
1350
3
S l
Riverview-P
1,60
1.60
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
1 0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
55.07
1387
1
Si
Cecil
5,20
4.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad,
69
0.00
16.04
0.00
75A2
1387
1
SI
Cecil
5,20
4.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9115
156
0
0
Broad,
156
0.00
36.28
0.00
170.51
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 1 of l 1

Waste U in 'cable gar 1
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(ibs/A)
Cann,
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs1A)
Res.
Qbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(awe)
LiqL Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1391
2a
Si
Pacolet
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad_
52
0.00
12.14
0.00
43.7
1391
2a
S1
Pacolet
3.60
3.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
4/1-9115
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
27.21
0.00
97.95
1391
2b
S1
Pacolet
3.50
3,50
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
37.21
0.00
130.23
1391
3a
S1
Pacolet
7.60
7.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.84
0,00
92.42
1391
3a
S1
Pacolet
7.60
7.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
411-9/15
121
0
0
Broad.
121
0.00
28,14
0.00
202.60
1391
3b
SI
Pacolet
8.90
890
Fescuc Hay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
182
0.00
42.32
0.00
376.69
1391
4
SI
Pacolet
2,30
2.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
9/1-3131
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
13,67
0.00
30.08
1391
4
S1
Pacolet
2,30
2.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
0.00
29.77
0.00
65.49
1492
I
S1
Pacolet
2.90
2.70
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
182
0.00
42.32
0.00
114.28
1492
2
S1
Pacolet
5.50
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7/31
137
0
0
Broad,
137
0.00
31.86
0,00
159.30
1576
1
SI
Riverview-P
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
100
0
0
Broad.
60
0,00
13.96
0.00
87.91
1576
1
S1
Riverview-P
6.30
6.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34,42
0.001
216.83
1589
1
SI
Pacolet
2.40
2.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Broad.
57
0.00
13.25
0.00
31.81
1589
1
SI ,
Pacolet
2.40
2.40
Soybeans, Manurcd, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
Broad.
124
0.00
28.84
0.00
69.21
1589
2
SI,
Pacolet
3.75
3.50
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.84
0,00
44.93
1589
2
S1
Pacolet
3.75
3.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
4/1-9/15
121
0
0
Broad.
121
0.00
28 14
0.00
98.49
1590
1
SI
Pacolet
5.60
5.50
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
55
0.001
12-84
0.001
70.60
1590
t
SI
Pacolet
5.60
5.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
4/1-9115
121
0
0
Broad.
121
0.00
28.14
0.00
15437
1591
1
Sl
Cecil
6.00
5.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
15.63
0,00
82.82
1591
1
SI
Cecil
6,00
5.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.00
3535
0.00
187.35
1591
2
SI
Cecil
3.90
2.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
69
0.00
16.04
0,00
46.54
1591
2
Sl
Cecil
3.90
2.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9/15
156
0
0
Broad.
156
0.00
36.28
0.00
105.21
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 2 of I i

Waste U . on Table -%r I
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(ibs/A)
Com-
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Res.
0bs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
ppbed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liq. 'Solid
Manure- Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1659
1
UI
Cecil
10.20
10.20
Annual Ryegrass - Hay
3.8 Tons
8115-5/15
169
0
0
Irrig.
85
161,14
0.00
1,643.59
0.00
1659
1
U1
Cecil
10.20
10.20
Annual Ryegrass - Pasture
3.8 Tons
8115-5/I5
127
0
0
Irrig.
64
121.09
0.00
1,235.13
0.00
1659
2
UI
Pacolet
9.40
9.40
Rescuegrass Hay
*3.0
8/1-7/31
*133
0
0
Irrig.
133
253.62
0.00
2,384.06
0.00
1659
2
U1
Pacolet
9.40
9.40
Rescuegrass Pasture
*3.0
9/1-7/31
*100
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
UO
0,00
0.00
1659
3
Ul
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
67
128.15
0.00
666.36
0.00
1659
3
UI
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9115
152
0
0
Irrig,
152
289.86
0.00
1,507.25
0.00
1659
4
SI
Pacolet
13.50
13.50
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
408.13
1659
5a
SI
Pacolet
3.90
3.70
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tans
8/ 1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0,00
30.23
0.00
111.86
1659
5b
SI
Cecil
3.40
3.40
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
37.21
0.00
126.51
1659
6
SI
Pacolet
14.00
12,90
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
33.26
0.00
428.99
1659
8
Si
Pacolet
5.10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
151.16
1659
9
SI
Pacolet
2.50
2,50
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0.00
79.65
1748
1
SI
Pacolet
12.50
11.60
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tans
811-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31,86
0.00
369.58
1801
1
SI
Cecil
8.40
7.40
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/I-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.53
0.00
366.55
1801
2
S[
Pacolet
6.60
5.50
Fescue flay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
182
0.00
42.32
0.00
232.79
1876
1
SI
Cecil
1.30
1.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
64
0.00
14.93
0.00
16.42
1876
1
SI
Cecil
1.30
1.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad,
144
0.00
33.49
0.00
36.84
1876
2
S1
Cecil
6.30
5.30
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
260.93
1876
3
SI
Cecil
2.00
1.70
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
44.42
0.()Ol
75.51
1876
6
SI
Cecil
8.90
8.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.I
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
15.63
0,00
139.09
1876
6
S1
Cecil
8.90
8.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0,00
35.35
0.00
314.60
1876
9
S1
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
10.4
911-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
69
0,00
16.04
0.00
48.14
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/52009 \ UT Page 3 of I I

Waste U on Table ear 1
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
I Acres
Crop RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Cnmm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Res,
(IWA)
Applic.
MdW
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liq, Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1876
9
Sl
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9/15
156
0
0
Broad.
156
000
36.28
0.00
108.84
1886
1
Sl
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.8
9/1-3/31
120
0
0
Broad.
72
0.00
16.75
0.00
113.86
1886
1
S 1
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
41 bu.
4/1-9/15
159
0
0
Broad.
159
0.00
36.98
0.00
251.44
1938
3
Sl
Pacolet
15.30
14.80
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
182
0.00
42.32
0.00
626.41
1938
4
Sl
Pacolet
23.80
22.50
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0,00
27.91
0.00
627.90
1956
I
Sl
Pacolet
3.90
3.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
11.16
0.00
43.54
1956
1
S1
Pacolet
3.90
3.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
4/1-9/15
105
0
0
Broad,
105
0.001
24.42
0.00
95.23
1956
2
Sl
Pacolet
2.00
1.80
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
37.21
0.00
66.98
2112
01
S1
Pacolet
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
911-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
52
0,00
12,14
0.00
54.63
2112
01
S1
Pacolet
4.50
4.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
27.21
0.00
122.44
2112
02
Sl
ecil
2,60
2.40
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.53
0.00
118.88
2112
02a
Sl
Cecil
4.50
4.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4
9/1-3/31
I15
0
0
Broad.
69
0,00
16.04
0.00
69.00
2112
02a
S1
Cecil
4.50
4.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9115
156
0
0
Broad.
156
0,00
36.28
0.00
156.00
2112
03
S 1
Chewacla-P
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
• 10.0
9/1-3/31
* 106
0
0
Broad.
64
0,00
14.79
0.00
59.16
2112
03
Sl
IChewacla-P
4.00
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
177
0
0
Broad.
177
0.00
41,16
0.00
164.65
2112
04
S1
Pacolet
3,90
3.90
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
000
117.91
2112
05
St
Pacolet
8.00
8.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0.00
254.88
2112
06
Sl "
Pacolet
12.70
12.70
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0,00
404.62
2130
1
Sl
Cecil
5.20
3.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad,
67
0.00
15,63
0.00
57,82
2130
1
S l
Cecil
5.20
3.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1-9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.00
35.35
0.00
i30.79
9342
1
Sl
Pacolet
22.40
21.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
52
0.00
12.14
0.00
254.93
9342
1
Sl
Pacolet
22.40
21.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
30 bu.
4/1-9/15
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
27.21
0.00
571.39
336752 ' Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 4 of

Waste U .on Table Par 1
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop RYE
APpOc
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
pbs/A)
Carom
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(1bslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liq. Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9343
1
S24
Riverview-P
17.40
17.40
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
4.22
0.00
73.34
9343
1
S24
Riverview-P
17.40
17.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
10.32
0.001
179.62
9343
2
S24
Pacolet
4.10
4,00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
3.44
0.00
13.76
9343
2
S24
Pacolet
4.10
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
27 bu.
4/1-9/15
105
0
0
Broad.
105
0.00
T53
0.00
30.11
9640
4
S24
Riverview-P
7.70
7,70
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
60
090
4.30
0.00
33.12
9640
4
S24
Riverview-P
7.70
7,70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
411-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
10.61
0.00
8 L69
9641
1
S1
Riverview-P
15.50
15.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
60
0,00
13.96
0.00
216.28
9641
1
SI
Riverview-P
15.50
15.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/0
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34,42
0.00
533.48
9641
2
SI
Pacolet
4.10
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3 Tons
911-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
55
0.00
12.84
0.00
51.35
9641
2
S1
Pacolet
4.10
4.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
4/1-9/15
121
0
0
Broad.
121
0.00
28.14
0.00
112.56
9041
3
S1
Riverview-P
2.30
2.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
60
0.00
13.96
0.00
32.09
9641
3
S1
Riverview-P
2.30
2.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
38 bu.
4/1-9/15
148
0
0
Broad.
148
0.00
34.42
0.00
79.16
9642
2
S1
Pacolet
2.70
2.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
57
0,00
13.25
0.00
26.51
9642
2
S1
Pacolet
2.70
2.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
1Broad.
124
0,001
28.84
0.00
57.67
9643
t
S24
Cecil
15.30
15.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.t
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
4.82
0.00
73.70
9643
I
S24
Cecil
15.30
15.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
39 bu.
4/1=9/15
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.0
10.90
0.00
166.71
9643
2
S24
Pacolet
10.10
8.90
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
9/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
87
0.00
6.20
0.00
55.19
9643
2
S24
Pacolet
10.10
8.90
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tans
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
65
0.00
4.66
0.00
41.47
336752 Database Version I I Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 5 of

Waste U .on Table
ear 1
Nitrogen
Comm
Res.
I
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liq, Solid
PA
Fert.
Obs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
pplied
Applied
Applied Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field) (Field)
OWA)
(lbs/A)
(ibslA)
low
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
Tract
Field ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gallA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
7,436.39
----z-
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
34030
Balance, 1000 gallons
-7,096.09
Total Applied, tons
;! ;i
15,769.37
Total Produced, tons
y;, ! yc?
4,730.00
Balance, tons
'u
-11,039.37
Notes: i . in the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 6 of I 1

Waste U '6n Table ear 2
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop RYE
Applic.
period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Redd
Obs/A)
Cornm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res. I
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Liquid
ManurrA
pplied
(acre)
Solid .
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liq, Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Feld)
N
N
N
N I
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1324
I
Sl
Pacolet
9.30
9.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
35
0.00
8.09
0.00
72.84
1324
1
S1
Pacolet
9.30
9.00
Com, Silage
17.4
2/15-6/30
190
0
20
Broad,
170
0.00
39.53
0.00
355.91
1325
1
Sl
Pacolet
13.40
12.70
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
182
0.00
42.32
0.00
537.53
1325
2
Sl
Pacolet
18.50
18.20
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
27.91
0.00
507.90
1325
3
Sl
Riverview-P
I3.90
13.80
Fescue Pasture
4.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
150
0
0
Broad.
150
0.00
34.88
0.00
481.39
1325
5
Sl
Pacolet
10.50
9.30
Fescue Pasture -
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0,00
30.23
0.00
281.16
1325
6
Sl
Pacolet
5.90
5.40
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
811-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
27.91
0.00
150.70
1336
0!
SI
Pacolet
14.60
14.00
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30,23
0.00
423.25
1336
02
S1
Riverview-P
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, SilageAiay
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
38
0.00
8.84
0.00
38.00
1336
02
St
Riverview-P
4.30
430
Corn, Silage
20.9
2115-6/30
228
0
20
Broad.
208
0.00
48.37
0.00
208.00
1350
2
S!
Riverview-P
10.50
10.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
40
0,00
9.30
0.00
97.67
1350
2
S!
Riverview-P
10.50
10.50
Corn, Silage
22.0
2/15-6/30
240
0
20
Broad.
220
0,00
51.16
0.00
537.20
1350
3
81
Riverview-P
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
40
0,00
9.30
0.00
14.88
1350
3
S1
Riverview-P
1.60
1.60
Cam, Silage
22.0
2/15-6/30
240
0
20
Broad.
220
0.00
51,16
0.00
81.86
1387
1
S1
Cecil
5.20
4.70
Small Grain, SilagdHay
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
46
0.00
10.70
0.00
50.28
1387
I
S1
Cecil
5.20
4.70
Corn, Silage
21.9
2115-6/30
239
0
20
Broad,
219
0.00
50.93
0.00
239.37
1391
2a
S1
Pacolet
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
35
0.00
8.09
0.00
29.14
1391
2a
St
Pacolet
3.60
3.60
Coro, Silage
17.4
2115-6/30
190
0
20
Broad.
170
0.00
39.53
0.00
142.32
1391
2b
S I
Pacolet
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
37.21
0.00
130.23
1391
3a
Sl
Pacolet
7.60
7.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3 Tans
9/1-3/31
92
1 0
0
Broad.
37
0.00
8.56
0.00
61.62
1391
3a
Sl
Pacolet
7.60
7.20
Corn, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
20
Broad.
181
0.00
42.09
0.00
303.07
1391
3b
Sl
Pacolet
8.90
8.90
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
182
0
1 0
1 Broad.
I
0.00
42.32
0.00
376.69
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 7 of I I

Waste U 'on Table
ear 2
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs1A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(IbsIA)
Res.
pbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Manurr-A
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liq, Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1391
4
S1
Pacolet
2.30
2.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
81 Tons
911-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
9-12
0.00
20.06
1391
4
S1
Pacolet
230
2.20
Com, Silage
19.6
2115-6130
214
0
20
Broad.
194
0.00
45-12
0.00
99.25
1492
1
SI
Pacolet
2.90
2.70
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
911-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
182
0.00
42.32
0,00
114.28
1492
2
SI
Pacolet
5.501
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0.00
159,30
1576
1
Si
Riverview-P
6,30
6.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
40
0.00
930
0.00
58.60
1576
1
S1
Riverview-P
6.30
6.30
Cam, Silage
22.0
2/15-6/30
240
0
20
Broad.
220
0,00
51.16
0.00
322.32
1589
1
Sl
Pacolet
2.40
2.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
38
0.00
8.94
0.00
21.21
1589
1
S1
Pacolet
2.40
2.40
Com, Silage
19.0
2/15-6/30
207
0
20
Broad.
187
0.00
43.49
0.00
104.37
1589
2
S1
IPacolet
3.75
3.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3 Tons
911-3/31
92
0
0
Broad,
37
0.00
8.56
0.00
29.95
1589
2
S1
Pacolet
3.75
3.50
Com, Silage
18.4
2/15-6130
201
0
20
Broad.
181
0.00
42.09
0,00
147.32
1590
1
S1
Pacolet
5.60
5.50
Small Grain, Silagc/liay
8.3 Tans
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
37
0.00
8.56
0.00
47.0
1590
1
S1
Pacolet
5.60
5.50
Corn, Silage
18.4
2115-6/30
201
0
20
Broad.
181
0,00
42.09
0.001
231.51
1591
1
SI
Cecil
6.00
5.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
W.I
911-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
45
0.00
10.42
0.00
55.22
1591
1
S1
Cecil
6.00
5.30
Corn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
231
0
20
Broad,
211
0.00
49.07
0.00
260.07
1591
2
S I
Cecil
3.90
2.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10A
911-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
46
0.00
10.70
0.00
31,02
1591
2
S1
Cecil
3,90
2.90
Corn, Silage
21.9
2/15W30
239
0
20
Broad,
219
0.00
50.93
0.00
147.70
1659
I
UI
Cecil
10.20
10.20
Annual Ryegrass - Hay
3.8 Tons
8/15-5/15
169
0
0
Irrig.
85
161.14
0.00
1,643.59
0.00
1659
1
UI
Cecil
10.20
10.20
Annual Ryegrass - Pasture
3.8 Tons
8115-5115
127
0
0
Irrig.
64
121,09
0.00
1,235,13
0.00
1659
1
UI
Cecil
10.20
10.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6
4/l-9/15
141
0
0
Irrig.
141
268.981
0.00
2,742,571
0.00
1659
2
UI
Pacolet
9A0
9.40
Rescuegrass Hay
*3.0
8/1-7/31
* 133
0
0
[Trig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1659
2
U1
Pacolet
9.40
9.40
Rescuegrass Pasture
*3.0
811-7131
*100
0
0
Irrig.
100
190.69
0.00
1,792.53
0.00
1659
3
UI
Cecil
5,20
5.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1
-
9/1-3/31
-
112
I-
0
0
Irrig.
Ii
45
85.43
0.00
444.24
0.00
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 8 of 1

Waste U 'on Table Par 2
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
0bs1A)
Comae
Fell.
Nutrient
Applied
Obs/A)
Res.
(16s1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liq, Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1659
3
U 1
Cecil
5.20
5.20
Corn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
231
0
20
Irrig.
211
402.37
0.00
2,092.30
0.00
1659
4
SI
Pacolet
13.50
13.50
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
408.13
1659
5a
S [
Pacolet
3.90
3.70
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
111.86
1659
5b
S1
Cecil
3.40
3.40
Fescue Pasture
4,9 Tons
81I-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
37.21
0,00
12&51
1659
6
S1
Pacolet
14.00
12.90
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
33.26
0.00
42&99
1659
8
1 S[
Pacolet
5.10
5,00
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
151A6
1659
9
SI
Pacolet
2,50
2.50
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7131
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0.00
79.65
1748
1
Sk
Pacolet
12.50
11.60
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7131
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0.00
369.58
1801
1
SI
Cecil
8.40
7.40
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7131
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49,53
0.00
366.55
1801
2
SI
Pacolet
6.60
5.50
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
182
0
0
Broad.
192
0.00
42.32
0.00
232.79
1876
1
S1
Cecil
1.30
1.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
43
0.00
9.95
0.00
10.95
1876
1
S1
Cecil
1.30
1.10
Corn, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
0.00
46.05
0,00
50.65
1876
2
SI
Cecil
6.30
5.50
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/3 1.
204
0
0
Broad.
204
0.00
47.44
0.00
260.93
1876
3
SI
Cecil
2.00
1.70
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.001
44.42
0.001
75.51
1876
6
S1
Cecil
8.90
8.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
45
0.00
10.42
0.00
92,72
1876
6
S1
Cecil
8.90
8.90
Corn, Silage
211
2115-6/30
231
0
20
Broad.
211
0.00
49.07
0.00
436.71
1876
9
SI
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, Silage(Hay
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
46
0,00
10.70
0.00
32.09
1876
9
SI
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Corn, Silage
21.9
2115-6130
239
0
20
Broad.
219
0,00
50.93
0.00
152.7
1886
1
SI
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.8
9/t-3/31.
120
0
0
Broad.
48
0,00
11.16
0.00
75.90
1886
1
S1
Cecil
6.80
6.80
Com, Silage
22,5
2/15-6130
245
0
20
Broad.
225
0,00
52.32
0.00
355.81
1938
3
SI
Pacolet
15.30
14.80
Fescue Hay
4.1 Tons
8/1-7131
182
0
0
Broad.
l82
0.00
42.32
0.00
626.41
1938
4
Si
Pacolet
2180
2150
Fescue Pasture
3.6Tons
811-7131
120
0
0
1 Broad.
120
0.00
27.91
0,00
627.90
336752 . Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 9 of I I

Waste U on Table -ar 2
Tract
Source
Field ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(Ibs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
QbsIA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
LigL Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
galIA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1956
1
SI
IPacelet
3.90
3.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.2 Tons
9/1-3131
80
0
0
Broad.
32
0.00
7.44
0,00
29.02
1956
1
SI
Pacolet
3.90
3.90
Corn, Silage
16.0
2/15-6/30
174
0
20
Broad.
154
0.00
35.81
0.00
139.67
1956
2
S1
Pacolet
2.00
1.80
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
811-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
37.21
0.00
66.98
2112
01
SI
Pacolet
4.50
4.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
35
0.00
8.09
0.00
36.42
2112
01
SI
Pacolet
4.50
4.50
Corn, Silage
17A
2/15-6/30
190
0
20
Broad.
170
0.00
39.53
0.00
177.90
2112
02
S1
Cecil
2.60
2.40
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
0.00
49.53
0.00
118.88
2112
02a
SI
Cecil
4.50
4.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4
9/1-3131
1I5
0
0
Broad.
46
0.00
10.70
0.00
46.00
2112
02a
SI
Cecil
4.50
4.30
Corn, Silage
21.9
2/15-6/30
239
0
20
Broad.
21
0.00
50.93
0.00
219.00
2112
03
SI
Chewacla-P
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
•10.0
9/1-3/31
'106
0
0
Broad.
42
0.00
9.86
0.00
39.44
2112
03
S1
Chewacla-P
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
28.0
2/15-6130
291
0
20
Broad.
271
0.00
63.02
0.00
252.09
2112
04
SI
Pacolet
3.90
3.90
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
811-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
30.23
0.00
117.91
2112
05
Sl
Pacolet
8.00
8.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137 1
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0.00
254.88
2112
06
S1
Pacolet
12.70
12.70
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
31.86
0.00
404.62
2130
1
S1
Cecil
5.20
3.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
45
0.00
10.42
0.00
38.55
2130
1
S1
Cecil
5.20
3.70
Com,Silage
21.2
2115-6/30
231
0
20
Broad.
211
0.00
49.07
0.00
181.56
9342
1
S1
Pacolet
22.40
21.00
Small Grain, Silagefliay
T8 Tons
9/1-3131
87
0
0
Broad.
35
0.00
8.09
0.00
169.95
9342
1
S1
Pacolet
22.40
21.00
Com, Silage
17.4
2/15-6/30
190
0
20
Broad.
170
0.00
39.53
0.00
830.22
9343
1
S24
Riverview-P
17.40
17.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
2.81
0.00
48.90
9343
1
S24
Riverview-P
17.40
17.40
Corn, Silage
21.6
2/15-6/30
235
0
20
Broad.
215
0.00
15AI
0.00
268.18
9343
2
S24
Pacolet
4.10
4.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
32
0.00
2.29
0.00
9.18
9343
2
S24
Pacolet
4.10
4.00
Cam, Silage
16.0
2/15-6/30
174
0
20
Broad.
154
0.00
11.04
0.00
44.16
9640
4
S24
Riverview-P
7.70
7.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
40
0.00
2.87
0.00
22.08
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 WUT Page 10 of I I

Waste U on Table gar 2
Tract
Source
Field ID
I Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop RYE
Applic.
Peried
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Comm
Fett.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
0WA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liq, Solid
Manure Manure
Applied Applied
(Field) (Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9640
4
S24
iverview-P
7.70
7.70
Corn, Silage
22.0
2/15-6/30
240
0
20
Broad.
220
0.00
15.77
0.00
121.44
9641
1
S1
iverview-P
15.50
15.50
Small Grain, SilageAiay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad,
40
0.00
9.30
0.00
144.18
9641
1
Si
Riverview-P
15.50
15.50
Corn, Silage
22.0
2/15-6/30
240
0
20
Broad.
220
0,00
51,16
0.00
793.01
9641
2
Sl
Pacolet
4.10
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.3Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Broad. 1
37
000
8.56
0.00
34.23
9641
2
S1
Pacolet
4.10
4.00
Corn, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
20
Broad.
181
0.00
42.09
0.00
168.37
9641
3
SI
Riverview-P
2.30
2.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 ions
9/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
40
0.00
9.30
0.00
21.40
9641
3
S1
Riverview-P
2.30
2.30
Corn, Silage
22.0
2/15-6/30
240
0
20
Broad.
22
0-00
51.16
0.00
117.67
9642
2
Sl
Pacolet
2.70
2.00
Small Grain, SilageJHay
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad_
38
0.00
8.84
0,00
IT68
9642
2
SI
Pacolet
2.70
2.00
Conn, Silage
19.0
2115-6/30
207
0
20
Broad.
187
0,00
43,49
0.00
86.98
9643
1
S24
Cecil
15.30
15.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad,
45
0.00
3.21
0.00
49.14
9643
1
S24
Cecil
15.30
15.30
Conn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6t30
231
0
20
Broad.
211
0.00
15.13
0.00
231.42
9643
2
S24
Pacolet
10.10
8,90
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
87
0.00
6,20
0.00
55.19
9643
2
S24
Pacolet
10.10
8.90
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad,
65
0.00
4.66
0.00
41.47
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
9,950.35
fl`
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
340.30
Balance, 1000 gallons
-9,610.05�;w
Total Applied, tons
17,441.50
Total Produced, tons
r°'ti
4,730.00
Balance, tons^
i
12,711.50
Notes. 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2, Symbol * means user entered data.
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed_ 3/5/2009 WUT Page 1 I of 1 l

"he Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
rith soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1659
1
Cecil
0.40
1.0
1659
1 2
Pacolet
1 0.40
1 1.0
1659
1 3
Cecil
1 0.40
1 1.0
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/5/2009 lAF Page 1 of I
NOTE; Symbol * means user entered data.

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste StoracFe C',anacity
Source Name
I Chapman Farms -Liquid Manure Slugj
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
11/1
90
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
90
1
2
90
1
3
90
1
4
90
1
5
90
1
6
90
1 _
7
90
1
8
90
1
9
90
1
t0
90
1
11
60
1
12
29
2
1
17
2
2
90
2
3
90
2
4
90
2
5
90
2
6
90
2
7
90
2
8
90
2
9
90
2
10
90
2
11
90
2
12
90
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
---- --------------------••--------- -----..-.------------....---------------------------------------------..-..--.
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-05-2009 Capacity Page I of

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Manazement
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface.waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..
336752 Database Version 3.1 pate Printed: 3/5/2009 Specification Paze 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following; The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be -applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
............. ----------------- -------------------
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009- Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the Iiquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
---- --------------------- ------------------------ ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------..----I—--
-336752 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/5/2009 Specification Page 4

Tract, Field, and Irrigation Pull Listing
Chapman Dairy Farm
Land Use/
Tract or Field #
Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irrigated Acres Landowner
Tract 1324
Map 3
Mildred Meadlock
1
9.3
9.0
Cropland
Tract 1325
Map 1
Sue Childers & Family
1
13.4
12.7
Hayland
2
18.5
18.2
Pasture
3
13.9
13.8
Pasture
5
10.5
9.3
Pasture
6
5.9
5.4
Pasture
Tract 1336
Map 5
Thomas Harrington
1
14.6
14.0
Pasture
2
4.3
4.3
Cropland
Tract 1350
Map 6
Melinda Chapman
2
10.5
10.5
Cropland
3
1.6
1.6
Cropland
Tract 1387
Map 7
Tammy Watts
1
5.2
4.7
Cropland
Tract 1391
Map 15
Allen Bost
2a
3.6
3.6
Cropland
2b
3.5
3.5
Hayland
3a
7.6
7.2
Cropland
3b
8.9
8.9
Hayland
4
2.3
2.2
Cropland
Tract 1492
Map 21
Thomas Harrington
1
2.9
2.7
Hayland
2
5.5
5.0
Pasture
Tract 1576
Map 8
Roxanne Icenhour
1
6.3
6.3
Cropland
Tract 1589
Map 9
Larry Adams
1
2.4
2.4
Cropland
2
3.75
3.5
Cropland
Tract 1590
Map 12
Douglas K. Watts
1
5.6
5.5
Cropland
Tract 1591
Map 13
Travis Wike
1
6.0
5.3
Cropland
2
3.9
2.9
Cropland
Page 1

Tract, Field, and Irrigation Pull Listing
Chapman Dairy Farm
Land Use /
Tract or Field #
Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irrigated Acres Landowner
Tract 1659
Map 14
Bill Chapman
1
10.2
10.2 Cropland/Hayland
2
9.4
9.4 Pasture/Hay
3
5.2
5.2 Cropland
4
13.5
13.5
Pasture
5a
3.9
3.7
Pasture
5b
3.4
3.4
Pasture
6
14.0
12.9
Pasture
8
5.1
5.0
Pasture
9
2.5
2.5
Pasture
Tract 1748
Map 17
Harry Lee Moose
1
12.5
11.6
Pasture
Tract 1801
Map 22
Victoria & Eva Watts
1
8.4
7.4
Hayland
2
6.6
5.5
Hayland
Tract 1876
Map 16
Meril Moose
1
1.3
1.1
Cropland
2
6.3
5.5
Hayland
3
2.0
1.7
Hayland
6
8.9
8.9
Cropland
9
3.0
3.0
Cropland
Tract 1886
Map 2
Terrill & Sherry White
1
6.8
6.8
Cropland
Tract 1938
Map 17
Harry Lee Moose
3
15.3
14.8
Hayland
4
23.8
22.5
Pasture
Tract 1956
Map 18
Pansy Howell Estate
1
3.9
3.9
Cropland
2
2.0
1.8
Hayland
Tract 2112
Map 19
Bill Chapman
1
4.5
4.5
Cropland
2
2.6
2.4
Hayland
2a
4.5
4.3
Cropland
3
4.0
4.0
Cropland
4
3.9
3.9
Pasture
5
8.0
8.0
Pasture
6
12.7
12.7
Pasture
Page 2
r

Tract, Field, and Irrigation Pull Listing
Chapman Dairy Farm
Land Use 1
Tract or Field #
Total Acres
Broadcast Acres
Irrigated Acres Landowner
Tract 2130
Map 4
Bill & Daniel Chapman
1
5.2
3.7
Cropland
Tract 9342
Map 7
Barnes, Kerley, & Watts
1
22.4
21.0
Cropland
Tract 9343
Map 20
Bill Chapman
1
17.4
17.4
Cropland
2
4.1
4.0
Cropland
Tract 9640
Map 11
Robin Crowe.
4
7.7
7.7
Cropland
Tract 9641
Map 10
Roxanne Icenhour
1
15.5
15.5
Cropland
2
4.1
4.0
Cropland
3
2.3
2.3
Cropland
Tract 9642
Map 4
April Jenkins & Darlene Charles
2
2.7
2.0
Cropland
Tract 9643
Map 20
Bill Chapman & Others
1
15.3
15.3
Cropland
2
10.1
8.9
Pasture/May
"The corresponding soil maps are placed directly behind the tract maps.
Page 3

m
,+ F
L
Usable - 12.7 Ac.
!
4�. ftiT�y
ear--:: Usable-9.3AG
Am
AV

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
-Alexar ail & Water Conservation District Scale F
1"=500' 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,OL

„�. , d - `:r 5. � ' '; h f6'- r . •rr'� #i t { 4 ' : � �'+ 7 �,�•'� _.f`� - J i�4 3- •.. ,� ram. ��� �...., .F..� „t�-� ,-- k a,r - �. - '
�IS`:`f•� ” .1i,'"�t3�'�� 1�.�"1,-: 1� �� � �t?�"�,S'7` ,•iy;.����j,�.L i -4 ;, r S.~ ��i�'' ;_ �'• ��i �� ' � f r, Y i-i
A�l}
y+'ia7's ., y- y'�:,.� =i- '�L'Y it•=' 7 *i• - - - - - s�•'xi+ sf�.�,•{,s. '•r
�1 4 k Y. . �• `{ li' Y �•-" tity; j` � 1. vr'^�� i-'�.. � t - 6 � - y .. _ `�� °� _ _
t��. 4S .•�#:?.:1�� J'�T' ol��. � .� S(i`r/-3•r�''�Fi6�3, 'fit. 1 t -1 _l. ;rs _ _ _ __ ,i 1� r
F •r•�j xr7 �r � � i ��Y S �a �� L�� d S � �i � ,� �.r + S #. i i i � . /, y �' � 't - � -` - r t ft ti-S'"
+�,.i� c F�f �lix t�T. •�}����•��-�'"' .�}`�r �"a �y:� ], i r ,y.l .j � _•t '� s �• �'�_. ;'. _� 'y ����L 4• ,'�f
'1i+I f r i�,� � ��iT '�k r• �+.��'' _,,��� �i,.. � 4':. � , � t �c y `i ati � - '� � -• �',��� -
`F 'C f#pr-i A1.y� Yi �� 4 i1A< ��`•�. �' Y5- I • - _ —'' t q
�';�� c
4.
� i' �''4y,::� � +` wfT� rr�3=aS��� i- ,�,�� �+�'� Tom_ -_ �-- _ .- J �r a "`• - -
-.' s �!' L•� ��'` � i �' { � rr 4 f � f � ti ti F � d ; � '-t. r "� 41 t.,-". r- � _ � r a'� _ n ' •
's ` • � i � } ;3 J ' ! } 1 S
j"2 lr, ter^ i a.-.'/I17T1r14t� yr Y.•v� f i. + • , x .k -
S
s f� ... 1- _a ..d' ""e -.T �Gf'�•si'ii. `H'+, r"�•� t. ,€ f >�
�+r`}".ri`tfs"S- .8 r
•�: i� Tt�'- r-ri','4` -�� }-�• � j�.*�•,•t��� �.: "' '§ „Ty.^', '�a 's ''' �:• i. .�•' i,,- �i .
'-`,`aiSr- � r +• , f -. t TU a ; a t � i {- a ..( ,. Ir _ .
S a { t' tte►sX. - - - ' s{� � 4 _ r j ' : � T Y' ,a t � t s r :_S ;7 Y', j
+t
3-"r .! ,3. Yr i '!•.¢-, f_ 't j ��,rL, -LL rL rr }' - „ i _ r j +
41
Legend
Minor -Roads i
Emu= Major Roads
Al
Field Boundary
- F t,, -J{ �� �y� � •'P� t � ka �}�, "f. ��� t� },� r ,�� i y�y -#• _ .' s r4 .
c
+i' _ 4 r

;j �� �L �'l `y a, Y+l���kP�..'��1� <s �', �1�^* �f} �` V ,�. '�-i ��,V_ �'ilrr ``. Y� 1 ��7t �' `��"`,."a�.,,. ���'.. �^ti �+' __ ,`�-'t'-T 1•n,-�.��', , (�'iR "- r�Z •Y'.
f+'2 J r Z:.. S� • �1 1 r .�� i •�,1 �_ +' t C `a �.�•a'�'_ s
''aPCCr _ •'t. i.•:}•-, '�,. �i!( � :i • � "i. ♦-
.fit. � .. R,
X Rk Y r..•' '+'t � P`iS"1+C� � •.ti: r �` �./ "" ��. � i1•r f � :'
-Y i- R `•�. Y T—t ... tG '.r, 0). 5, • a[ is j^P 10 v q •:` r.: t. - , '` t , - _ a `_.
�iq,' � � W.L. Sx .�.`v ��� � r'�T}, �i x+��,• - c• y, � + - .. t .?�� � - .... - � - }
fi ~Y d � .t"` •� t'P mil, _ �. r�
;�`}\'. � � i s1_. a1f. J4 1Y '.� a 1' •� •� "� � f J
'_ts �iY,.'i° 3 •. ��t �� * ++. a i �� 1 •.� - �' �� i! }.1 t' f� a�: , ,.- - T -`.:v _ _ '..�,'>. l - r I�r
J
`n�.R4`�� :,t+•ISy�#���'t
,[ Jti � �l �� l l+ ��` � - �t_ 1` .�S + , ^s="`-^ "' ,ham - • ,-.�: _y �.- f _ [/f
x ii--.•.,, � : it l ' '' "� � � � •_ �" `� � � _ �- �` '
' X e 2 aY t
�� � tiCa, � � _ �' A�j�"I t r 1 '�'t�' '�_•' s ��` w.,� �-S;F�` z.. - � - .. ,��, i �ti.
I '' �, �i �y Fi s s.� `� '�' l' �'Y�i� �„'�xF #} {Sa �y,i �4�1'`f�•',r},�..a :` ';•V `�`Y •.- - _ - - - -, .,`
• 1 :iti �� t ••1Iy f �i -,'1;� . yi+ �.s' i .i t J i.t •
w ,�. �d-.'�yr,."^'�r'..�---,:� •affij.'Y3�" ,j.. ' _Arjtil + ` i.' - ,
PCC2 Usable 6.8 Ac _
rF<�{rY
Legen
t•{{. C' �4, # S Minor Roads
r
of

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
51,
Legends
Minor Roads
Major Roads 4 [ - £'•
'—N—* Hydrology
Field Boundary
0 200' Dwelling Buffer
.Alexar
i ract _i 4L4 - wIap a
k
Fieltl 1� J
- t 9
1
. • '� 7,
-
I
A & Water Conservation District Scale F
1" = 300' 150 300 600 900 1,21

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
Tract 1324 - Map 3
Al
Y % •G
Via. •�
E.t�u z. t T• � 1. .7 - �jI =t. 3
� , .` •.,c`T -v.. r�� c � r r�, tiT r � ` -s� �- �� ;z�.
�'� � ��'" �Z•-�" t'-�"'^��`���_� dam__ -� c -'�'S c+� ,_ 1� •Y � � � a, �. �:,'�y.
t c.
Lr C g r O
Legend
Minor Roads rt
Major Roads
rS,* Hydrology j. ra •. �F `
Field Boundary ` Y
Soil Map knits
200' Dwelling Buffer,.
4 c
•Alexal :)ii & Water Conservation District Scale
1" = 300' 150 300 600
--
x
m
=1Y
N
F
900 1,21

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
Scale
-'Alexai oil & Water Conservation District
'[" = 300' 150 300 600 900 1,2t

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
-0-__ _ • A J w A A A w A w - a A
N
Alexar ail & Water Conservation District 1.0 " = 1
300' 150 300 600 900 1,2C

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
T_ _• I A A A a s r
1 raci 11330 - nnaD :)
I *t
'�•
f .y,Yli'f'3�E4Yt 3,4Y- 'v ',At
/ �
�• 3
�~
S, w4^� ?`
_�.
AL
JIM
12
Ltd' .. Ti7Y'
YA
a
i_
_
Usabte
- I I
N
Alexar ail A Water Conservation District Scale F
1" = 30W 150 300 600 900 1,k

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
Scale F
Aiexar. iil & Water Conservation District
1" = 300' 150 300 600 900 1,2G

• _k r_ _ i `: ems• 'rl ; •_ �.1' • ^•_j�"xl- - - -
- ; �' f9t� Y•;.-, .Y y - �,'-�� is i.jj���,,'1`' t�-_ � -r �' - _' �-��'
�. l • 1 -v 1� , i , r } �'-f•..•.S • "�'- • `� R c,y 1 f� f ± 1
''�'S�"^;,, _ '( - - - �. .s _'a' mob' 't' . 'A•��• r-^a �` r - �.,-L4'� ,y�' b• - J.
;Jf �1 •.!�
r x . • -- . • jj' , {,►.fir �l r �'�' .� --: �- „- _ •.: -.
Al
•1 u — Y � .'. s «� •ir z
v'-'lj"S••}�""•eliG3'�.:7�w@
'+*
-Usable -105AGI �z_Ii S c -
1' la4
��'_,.I. - f ,•�r} .i7a.�,` 'SF' .�. ` Tk _ �A �+y 'rLry'A�
,s { • j a�., r'� Legend
Usa6te.".1.6
Minor Roads
-Mpior Roads
Hyd
logy
01
fps a f t 86undai
i 4 rt r 1 sr' a : 3 a •. ti g S ; rt t y
- • .3 - ,l=a..�L. _-_lt-_ ..� .�.-� �?� - _ V� %` +Is f--e'3 c..-"�.�.1•-3c -. .:.r ��>�l r�ieYrs 9+-- _,. � ik. _F ri+,.l,'; k �+ .c ii .. _. ,�'.. 1'

CeB2 �. • i .; ,� ' - fir ' t,J�3r� ti � -.� s z J"�
CeB2 `. ri i itiY /�`t l f S r t i r +
• �. -� h. Lti*•`J`�A% '.+. �.J�•"'rr. • �. , 2.' � t di�,, ;?�_��6y j��:'}-.= f -_ a. __l. ' ;+"�:�
y i �J `� •. ,. Sere Y •�� r� � r .� - 3.�• f�} N. � *�_ � 1'�q`r_- � •t "�• •�
XhA
:EPcC2' F r. PaD
- :) y` art _ .. .. . -' •%% '� � .�-• r ti. - +� _ .h
lip
It
PaD 1 r ryYl+' " ,if,f • �; Y -� ` { ' 1*
;� 4, 9 n• J - 5 r _ , � f�i � . I•, � f � 5 � � 3 ,r h rr �� i r* r e =' [µ
- �� - ar �A - -_- ��' • . � ".
r ' "r' `4 ; °•�ti r Usable,- 10.5 AC:+ aS �CC2fs$
'PaD CIiA :.
Js' ^L '7'-' -' � � tt +t - y _� .a 'i-1-.r...•5n >•"- `c':-s .. , 'd � .� A - ._.J -J� L
,� �• . ` tti t�i ri} rF �� - 4 .� usable.- .8'Ac. Sw_.
en
NX
`'�• •_
Minor Roads
Emms Major Roads
Field Bounds
.j't .i i = ..�.w,,.�..a »a'r-�.. r. _ s..` f r:r :r r- '_iy 'R t -f = I �•a
PaD PcC2 r� >".': f�PCC.2 F, LSD f� Y _ '
�'s c . mot—. ._ �_. e�..t 9:„s a€ � � ,.Y�rY �. •! Y- .v. .w.a ��_1 ��. .+. _,. �.. .._. ,.. Yt T

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
9-._ _ 1_ I A A 1 A A A I A a M
N
Alexar, )il & Water Conservation District Scale F
1" = 400' 200 400 800 1,200 1,6G

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
T . • JAA-0 A Aw IA wM
- N
Alexar Al & Water Conservation District Scale F
1 " = 400' 200 400 800 1,200 1,6C

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
i ract -i Z)r d - wIap is
,�*-` ..• _tidy: � � �are�. _ '� �' - �
.A •S 7'� � ti• y � -�
i �•F 1 .• :� 1 I' r
T1576f
r r
1
nF
-
Legend
Mutor Roads
EMOM Major Roads
!7' St.., Hydrology
:.Field Boundary
25' S"am Buffer
N
Afexa[ ail & Water Conservation District Scale r
1 " = 300' 150 300 600 900 1,2t

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
r. — — & A d". -w 0% a! 0%
Alexa-:
I IdUll. I Uf 0 - 1V1d[J 0
6.3PC.
111WAMN
A
Z
V,
UfA,
Le'&-nd
Minor Roads
Major Roads
O—NL, Hydr6lo6
Boundary
Soil Map UnIts
oil & Water Conservation Scale r . District V = 300' 150 300 600 900 1,2k

0
0
N
O
O
A
Q
O
I
O ,
O
111
' z

O
O
N
O
Q
0
a
0
w�
0
' z

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
Alexa oil & Water Conservation District Scale
1" = 500` 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,0,

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
Tract 9641 - Map 10
N
Alexa oil & Water Conservation District Scale
1" = 50W 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,0k

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
Tract 9640 - Map 11
N
Scale 1
Alexar ail & Water Conservation District
1" = 500' 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,OC

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
Alexan ril & Water Conservation District Scale F
1" = 50w 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,OG

i
X
0)
I
5I
fD
Ci
O
CD
O
7
0
CO
Rl
Cl)
r-n
i C
It
C co
O
O
N
O
AI
0
0
C
O
O
0 ,
0 —n
TV
' —
y N
n G � • t F r. � ��a���� aC ' r.��:: iF - .�.y `�t }-.�'7k'.�� 5 R r
�
�l
1 ♦
S O
i'1 it •
ty�r Firyy l A4t ""
k�e+.F.yU�'
�,�d¢r'�' .,s.� :,.�� t F'{� .. SP}• I � . V fi''4r 4� : /r !�r
d 4� }jb�� r ' `Yr1-: • •�-'�� y JF [� �l. 'ti 1 t:.FY Y N'-�
co cn '�: / ,� • t r �-.� w i ,,,E
cp
All,
` ''.7F � alw••• `yw.v i ^� 'n v� '
f� 1y', � 1�,.1:' s1}ti,,,w..� A -• ,�'• y' k1.1S � f � a1 i
CP
� "� t1 �'iy �, �� 1^'� ,l�y•�.t F" 1 , - a*Y -. Z &`fir .y> �Yi; t t� €ly. ,
�^ _, Oyu i,��?,i�g i .3"��i'�"'" r � M'' t: � �. r � - �.�,,,.a .;n.;• �.r
�� `sir: �. ,._ . �',��3I, �' � � �.•

14
ro
x
m
7
0
0
N
O
O
A
0
11
O�
0
0 T1
M)
' z

r. •��, s -G:� �L�,[ �� fi`��`r�,� �.*."�'r�cu�'-� gI .y �.rTf� - "f• ,y. 9. .� - � Si.—��� �'�� = •
ch , t' t -�. �54 ,1 _ _L- Y' � � }}� ;�. 1 • � � - `r�� t — ~ e, �? 1,`ay7i< � � ..�•�i��•._•� , "
• tY4,.� .. .7e } f _ `" _ -ram a � 1. �� � � � 'x t�`�
' 1 T r _ '+4i _ ti - 'y � L {Ft - 1 + i •S J- � _ j L� �r ^4 _ � - � -
+-r•f "�'..{"� !; J 1l r s - {. - 7 �� lrll•Jl�l. ! �1��-i� •,� _ ; l ,
TW
T.
vim
i • 7 -ll ? ti rr - _ + pp� _ - s ,)jpp _ •
z���'kt ``� . " �J ,j4 _'U11.31.U47'_f �,, ter. - • � .�• 4 -•
r;_„gyp.`-$ �'�r?' y �.., -+�_ `+ . i �?' +a-»r•- ,�� �q — - - Rtu U'
• _{'` - _ l
Field
+ J • �— ~, -
9
—. �_ .k -!• J ` f�',

y., r ,• �, ds 4 tam ,�;,.1 .:.t��rx: �Y��e•- .._.. � , � � ,- �,� ,, _. r ti - • �t ��. .�.� � _
.,,►
ed
TIM
PaD
►: ie 'O' }�L� 1
I� . ��•,.. , .� � � � , � �d t {j - - Cal 9• ,� -
�r� ' -� wy�-{+ �,F .r S .1Y [ 3. 3 - w. �.i�'.! `� ,.•j '-1�y,I7,�7Q �� '.
.C6132'
`• V
".4r ':- f .ti •. 1. - ! , T - ,,
Usable Acres'
Field 2
s` . �. r . f • Pal]:=
ML
12
f�,�

�x/ � •�� � •,fit ;�"� �° �1 _F+a a �+�t�� 4(�} ��' _
Ce62
M
PaD
�, �' _ _ _ � y .r' _ - � �'.. �+ t' `r L`1"L4.:U_J � � _ � :• •' .sue•_ .
� ,I00,:N41
Af
� , � •�� +4 •� A " � I! 't ' s.• - _Y, 1i17LLfalAf �Jl � �.•t•���''
1 i- _ '�' DOB"� L' - - t � ! �s •+ ,
-
t - .} PAD. r ` , ,PArtor Roads

1
Usable - 7 2 AC j,_,"�R .
• • � `� f Ya 11Y 61•Mlf-?� `
Usable = 8 9,Ac' l IAiNL F
� •� p 'C'�y� .i ysy c
•� • A l � ri - u 44.4 �+' 'k '� �'
;r t;Usahle 15A�c
Usabr
:r Yi 11• .Yk.I. k.r r... � t 1

ik
Pao
kKIL
.. Rni
DoB
.f • �� - _ Usable • 2:2 Ac.,� _ ��
�� � - • :� Usable - 72 Ac .,fa::,e. .. ° t- - L4+,
Tim
it
b � -
,n S r ec
. ey-' ,_ ; Y,' u13 , k .4. �IJ-7�1►C�kJ�U J� _ �y� �''
RnE
�t4T - "::F � � � + Y,.rt :�. �`.}. Usable•3.SAc I�d �. ,
`� ' - . _ % F�. a it �_L 'v+te�• .j '- CsE
Rao 1
' s �' h a

- l � „r .ax, i �y ''°' �;�-�zjS - :�� •i���� '' •' �.' ''' i 3� S ; � -� cif/�� f L� �`�
' 4l �� t �...,,�i a _�J 1 ���� �•� t�� ..; � _ - � . "�;`'.�`=5�.��.�c
PINEY - •'•
'.� 1 • �,7. F � r� . _�f � ! � � � - )YY '„ �:• � �`[� �� `j /je • 1ri (,J }Lr�l} �i� .t, i..r s�^y`��.?ty�„-r
.. ` ' F , r �3��u..(a(�yi!e���+j ,k' L •+ + 5 ' } ` _ , yt r - 3 !. JYIa •
.+f •�. L, Lti _ _ lf[l.LL;J �% - \ _-z;-•'�-1at- - sh 4 i 'a' `.
Tim
[ 9t 113 �•S tpmQov
, r�..y� } ti,. �� C�„ a '�(•�\,�) � .t �v 1
- E�.. i � _ r _ � �>_ �� -1 .sx icy r•' 1 '. _ ;•�<�l-1
Um q
,�• 'RiN
� ��-1c •. :.y; .�- , _ .V�, �� '4+�i��� J 'ice �s •*
Uegehd
Um
gm
Minor Roads
•����'� - �i, �, r••�r •: i t: , ram' ._-4r A � . ,. � '
r. r• •sic '�•4 o-1 s No Hydrology
Field Boundary
• - �:y rr 'aim! f �. -'S'j.
jt 't •ti,4 l 1 Nr n 00D

�,� {`. 1�yf fL _ .3�{"!� c' .i 'J ._ 5 . tf� `tJ ins R�•
COE
Al
` ���' eL}1 JL ..! 1 �...�,�"i.-Y, ff '� t•, t S•ia - _.• - 4 ��.171
'r
`• '_•..•-t.I; "� ' • �• �; a, f , C�,��3 �. �'�t � � �:: ow �CC2�_ �a-�ti f #• r� .'� ., w
..._ � � ,r � r1 i ���•.� �1��' �1'y K'vT
_ eB2
�• , -.� '_ t r -r;• ; • fir.. 1 } "L..` +.
Jr.. _
- ���� „fir f '•Y _ • - __ ! � 2.
IT
�; 1 y; + �,�ys���,�ys�a � • 3-�.J� /gip/�'". � {�� �f +.C.
'� •r+ =�-i� . , `.i I, ; --Irl1Ji.JC yr f "' F. ri Y.T'., # � . r .
5•CeEl
lZ
f B2 3
Lebend
TIM
Usiabld
-Acirds,
�• - S.66
WI�iL!1 tl _ - it •+ '/'}`�-ty]` y- . ; tMin6r Roads
Ma
.; ...^ :,.,. ...;_ �- ..- .. f.�.— r. �:..� �i-.,i� _... fir=.. . •.. Gh/� . _ � .. .'�"' �i�.l:.:; i.

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
J w A J w w w =- J
f faGt5 -I r 40 09 -1 V30 - IVlap
2�kT
Al
' T1938
.� Field 3 _
V ( � utter •F +l�l..y7f
Via•; ,�..'� � z+_� a W� � .' _. � �r �� -_. � i .'.try���..��'..��.L-�,,��. � - /`,� �_ :'-� -° a
w i 15
-
�` 1111748 R
Field 1
ZEB WATTS
%:
4,7
s '"tl"4•.y 1
e�@nd
~ Minor Roads_
F e=: MaJo7r Roads6'',
r ��• Hydrology
` Field Boundary
s 25 stream Buffer-
' 26
0 {)welling:Buffer
N
Alexar ail & Water Conservation District Scale f
1 " = 400a 200 400 800 1,200 1,6L

Chapman ®airy Farm - WUP Maps
Tracts 1748 & 1938 - Mai) 17
4 =�_2 G� e.� ` � ,�?.+ K1 _ r w�.�kT .. •,`:x.. 4`_ ,:� t. - ,� yw�. ��,..t - y - ...
'�. � f S,p 't��'��i-,1�.� r _ 7 �,f3' � 1�y, u \. • 1� �iY y��`.` .} i '�•• �j y � �, �
�! r �� . �'''`' s r t , - 5. =� T1938 `� �� F ._. ±� -�' �-' � � �' �` � �-� �.`•,��x� , .
�'y '�E •may' � �''L � , v a "} ti y � d r - � �� �r'] � � �
i + , ��k i �.i R ��'4' f ' vt`S'� Y •. � _ �� _f C i '! ^F � _. ,
_ �� r � t �,Y >� • � �" .Field 4 ; �t � 1 �+! � � ;- � -
r, ' Z,_
<Y#
-
�,
f
ZEB WATTS Rb -SR 1s1B r R {5
K.
.
Al
Legend'
MmbrRoade.
� as ' ' }: , . f Major Roads
ct, ��� � S�` �':� � ' 4� � + �--.;"`!k � � s..►: ' a _� by x` i ;� �� F'lgdrotogy'`
Field Boundary
rR ° c .� _ r , a' ? k� � Soil Map Unlls
N
Scale F
Aiexal A & Water Conservation District
. 1" = 400' 200 400 800 1,200 1,61

� "s�C ^rr � -•'i 4 � ;' �+ �.A+� � �'!.; ;"f t :.,r - � M _ _ .1-. _ ' -. ��,. • s F f 'i � • _ ._ ,• ��r' - � f • � !
{ �,- � -t f i� �j „"i-•+••.•ear.';—.�1i� �'j�t � ..+; _i i _•- Ft ti (� �
.. •gay •,' T � � - � 4•, r .F ��. ,L, - _ _ _ • �� _
o _ Id.-. t v, t TAIT
11� V,
� t s� `r � a �y,lA� try _.. �! i r ��' st _ ;^' I i 1 T - 4 � ti • :' T i '• .'
rp
%f��`+r,'•i } i;: ` . -.�� _ - - _ 41• • _ ' Y -
�-.` �P� . -F �� i ;� }' i - - - r +r z•' -�' Yam. � � �
�•:��I :. r! ♦ j,,. : ±' w •' �. - �IFlA_=RL'JL [llL•1AJL7 ` �•
• •1i -{ , �, ; - ;� t , + . Usable • 3.9 Ac. Usable • t.B Ac.
Legend -
Minor Roads
MajorRoads
'f •� 7 Y, ` ti?. _„ r ant -•..� ,. 1 `
Field BoundarY
- rl _ a�•'�4"ate ' .�a j

_ r `
< mix jj,'�,,. �� r f �•.�� `t i • - e ? -
-. • r', .
1�Y•�+.+i— cq14
r-�L' 4� ' �j.y �' -i �.} t •+rif .:j - 1 -, - �•
CeB2 ? e S r ` . 4 '! ' - .�". _ - to 7 �� • ' k �I_.Z%i� � - i � s - � - - �_ ,
•F 7
r ♦>s r~ � � - _� �-[1l M`� �. � s
t r,
��:��'�� _ �� 'icwl,` .��i -F f's yli ��_ r V•1•� � .. P�.. �� i. + •
-
t /+ o �y v'
. "7 � •r r?r 1� L' -"'!"� � .` _ G;. - �.f L •� - Y � , � CeB2 L 1.
A -
J'4 - v.•/ ', _ w • _ .. to
t - CeB2Major Roads
Legend
Minor Roa
ds
44,
Hydrology-
;tr .y . ; ;; e ChA
Field Boundary
r Sail Map: Units PCC2
• f�l-lam A` :.r �i�74
��
,. CeB2
REM
Usable •'3.9 Ac.
S
PCC2.
PaD +
(w
Usable •'1,8 AG_
ChA
Pa ANY
Pa D
f

���i��1�„r ; t.=l, ` - ;.�/aa'� S z'` ,'1• U't11LLJ CJ rr 'I,� - - '- _ � - -� -, "sl ,..:r•�� •�►!�,� .P'r� R �; •L gip.;, •f'r{v:
I . i�7
i ?
Imtit , t r -_ `l ' • r {
c t t, rt;•� t � ' ". ,� --�.1-� S. F i _, 'ter 3�_�«
JxS.Y r - -�� �. �,j}' t'� ,�j � i � � �,'j. i•ti �. 7,� i �'L_
it- '-'s..'3k�.- { • .�F7!l ,.�'I l.. r'1y� - sf/� f .? ' R. 1'Y-_ ,ri. l
zl
Aegend
- _i _ � � ay _ � �4Y yvi ` ��`�7 Jr� r..f� � _- . 'rI�1#! . ; ., `- '"� ;, �n ij� ���^ -'r . Jt ��� 1•� • _��' •
r �•."*r'_RY"'���-f#r�� �� �� tY., 1'i ?,. cI Yam, �, � 1� �,�'el �1�` ��� ry.
S
Ujn(w Roads� -1 +' �= ti �y►'r �. i- � �' •'4 yf � 't) [� � ` 1^'� f � r� 4�l �I�r���J � ��- �
RoadsMajqr
t-�-`+� 1 [ --... I •S IJ l 5�+�.• 4 �'.r.� '1 Y� •1 _ S - I _
Hydrology ! s,,.� . _ t jai '"-� is i-+"'.. =r4 ll •. .. - v., ra.- - , f _ 7 y
Field Boundary .jr� 'wLrfSyk,.,��{Y 11 4 j _ •
2.51 Stream Buffer
- - r •`} } ft-;_[. "S. r 1- j �,r•,• _ _r. 1� a - . 1
fl
11

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
. Tract 2112 - Map 19
N
Alexar ail & Water Conservation District Scale
1" = 500' 1 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,t

I IL
ell
Jw-
S� ry1. .. J � : t �F 1 � .c .�3��� .. r l:P` � -. * ,.i`•: - •; A
Usable 15.3
Phu q
- y � ,� vim`-y^{ry"+�✓�,} T-! _ �J' 4E n y J Y�y','r .. } ��
Usable 17.4 Ac ¢ _ F�(1f: �' ''� wre .�•Y F ,,� *'
.�' _:l 'T - ��� _ - ' - / •- J �;i , � . ��t �p`w'i may. ,� . ' a xJ����1
r. ,i 1 rr l .. "'TTi i 'r �w� }, E1�` Y rIJ .�^N� V •V S*y +y
•f ff �, _ r -.'.k' - r%'-�x
- '` r �_ Syr-- _a }lY. ,, •�'��5 � a. ''' � "�;,r..+r„ � -�_���-. _ ��'.
o- - _._. •� �ei�"..+.�t=�� iF. '.._>,. _.�-. ` �• _�. � - - .- -a ...z+a�•�3:''.a:ta,.:eL«.. �-4'.s�Y .i'�..,;,'cl+�`ii` -4_., ��-_,.t'b'• ..,�'w:.r ,4'4 <.l -

iu
__r CeB2 �'e •� ��
_ sit r�/
'VC2,p...a-.li 2 - ` �� •.+4 ` • 4• ��4 •1 } 4 / .i,, ,r a� ` 1
PCC
" P f
,Papa ..�[� ' '' r j�1 -y. �"4`-'.�'. ��. - �I. r -• - . •. �'�r'.
pc
IL
• "�'' t.1���7>.. 1} �G; it � � - _ �'• S _ s `` ..�� �i.i �
��e�y�+��; i M. t CeB2 -- - 0e92 ,
"•' • � �7/•� f _ _ ' . � F tit
f _ iY Usable 15.3 Ac [ •}�' "� PCC2
1114
PaD
PaD
ViA:a.t
�.'`j�'.�.....�.r-.-�.�� -4 1 •��., ,5•:1 ��:4s•ti�f/�•.
Usah1E - 8.9 Ac: ?"
USAJO..oe�. PaD - K
IL
, .x
,'l ..,. yt�3 i�J �; - _ s -- •' die .y ' "*,-_`-"r.'��r��_ir`, c
"Usable' - 17.4 Ac
M•
® j� >t •' �-,.'>ti� �'1 1 �� ✓ - x 11: i a_. ! � 1'�. '�`- PC.[1L � „y� -drip '�.-. �3�0"� K.; ' k�
I .. _.... - �di �_Ik f .., .. ... .�. .._.=�•r` - -. --.. -. .. !-;:a��. �.��s. ,a .. ...a �i.,,rat,•......SFin.��.Ec'.c�`',_� `�...�.�'u-. �. ��.-..i �:ay+,.

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
Alexar ail & Water Conservation District Scale F
1" = 300' 150 300 600 900 1,2C

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
' N
Alexai -)il & Water Conservation District Scale F
1" = 300' 150 300 600 900 1,2(

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
Scale
Alexar ail & Water Conservation District
1" = 400' 200 400 800 1,200 1,E

Chapman Dairy Farm - WUP Maps
N
Alexar ail & Water Conservation District scale
1" = 400' 1 200 400 800 1,200 1,.

Date of Visit: t Arrival Time: ; Departure Time: County: i y0 Region: l .t3
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: V �' C �°1�!'�� Phone:.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title: Phone:
Certified Operator: p-W t 1 `\ " c C r -t emqk"',
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Design
.Current
Current`
`.. Design; Current
Swine Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry Gapacity Po
in
Cattle Gapaciity Pap.
Wean to Finish
Layer
airyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
a ....
a' Calf
Feeder to Finish
#y
Design Current
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
D Cow
D . P,oult .
Ca aci P.,o
-
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
[Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys t� y
Other Turkex Poults
Other Other"s t
Discharill and Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
[] NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No A
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[—]Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No �A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 5Z�N—o ❑ NA ❑ NE
_ r _
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Stcture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
of
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): `
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ;0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes a ❑ NA 0 NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes DTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Ev}i�drence of ind Drift ❑ Application Outside of App ed Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cy' 1 1 a � gC��� , ��
13. Soil Type(s): Y1lAUl `� " % 6-)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes,'J�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes1Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes '5;�Ko
❑ NA
[] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes )!gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes _:J�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 1ea
❑ NA
0 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �?+fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ease greements ❑Other:
2 L Do s record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the ropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Application y Freeboard aste Analysis Soil�Analysis aste Transfers er Code
6.F, nfali ocking2<eeee
ield 120 Minute Inspections ❑ DrtcMCy and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑ e urvey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 21412011 Continued

ftfacflity Number: jDate of Inspection:
~ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
a 1.
❑ Yes ,KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ No�A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly ispose of dead animals ith 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of enjer enc situat' s as required by the
❑ Ye o
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-applZa ion
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes"'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ AppIication Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes JE;Go
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes _J!�CNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
0 Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments{refer, to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any ather.comments.
Use drawings of. facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
0�17 -z
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/20II

(Type of Visit: 40 Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation C) Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 6 Routine '0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
-IIIII�IIIYIII -- - - I�I_PI�_PIIIIIIrI1Yr1 �
Date of Visit: a 1 Arrival Time: a3'.•'D _ . Departure Time: county: �A`r Region: _
Farm Name: Owner Owner Email:
T
Owner Name: Mf L4A,. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Tide:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: Zc) 9 2
Certification Number: ~~`
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current"
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
I ILayer
r Cow
in to Feeder
Non -La er
I
baiiy—Calf
Feeder to Finish'
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . aP,oul
Ca aei
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: ka_�
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any'part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No �NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �-
Spillway?: ---
�r
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �ry
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integnty of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes `o ❑ NA 0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes -:tSoo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �TN_o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes bkTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu., Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside f Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): c�M 604� a Fe:Sc-q
,
481�
13. Soil Type(s): rn v"/ V
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 13�ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did'the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?�
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes J!§�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ec �s s esign aps Lease Agreements Other:
WwasteAp
es record keeping need im vement? If yes, check t appropriate box belo ❑ Yes NA [] NE
plicatio Pee y Freeboard Waste Analysis it Analysis �aste ransfers ['W other Cade
infall ockingp Yield Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑.�.►Qge Survey.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a ram gauge. ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ o NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -I I Date of Inspection:
tt 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
�j25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec ❑Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure.to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [] No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of drad_aaiptals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �90
and report mortality rates that were higher than -normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ YesNo
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of em tion as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes>g:No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?q�YesVo
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes�NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any Additional recdmmendations'or any other comments: .
Use drawings of,facillty`to better explain'situati'M (use additional . ages'as necessary}.
-7 4c> r2 —�
rop
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

®.Division of WaterQuality
Facli3l�' NUmbel' ��. 4 Q Division of;Soil and'Water.Conservatfon
- - Other Agency
M .. operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Tech • � nical Assistance
Gnm�+llAnce inSpQetlOn O P
Reason for Visit *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied AccesFsr,
Date of Visit: O. 1�'�,�tz Arrival Time: f6` 1: Departure Time: OSS3r County: Region: m
Farm Name: GYtA Owner Email:
Owner Name: 5 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: T, : ___ Q!f—
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: O I C lkq
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: -
Operator Certification Number Z'7 _
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: a o= 6 Longitude: = c❑ 6❑
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity ' Population Wet Poultry C&pacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La ec
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Capacity Population
i Cow
Sffi
Dai Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: [t
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any 'part of the operation? ❑ Yes> CNo[__1NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No N El
b. Did the discharge reach waters.of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2'71
CA ❑ NE
-
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
121)8104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0 • �,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes ATo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No'_1R;PA ❑ NE
Sture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier.
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): <ti
5. Are there any immediate threats egrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ YesTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? VV
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and: the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. -Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes bk<_0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes'No ❑ NA [INE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes-�e_o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Rrifl ❑ Ap lication Ouutsi a of Area
�{�
12. Crop type(s) C S�r
I\ S
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? - ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes -9[o1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination s❑ Yes { ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
�Coinn ents (refer t6 quesiian #)i Explain any, YES answers and/or any recommendations or any,ather comments �, r
l7si:Atawrings of facility to'better explain situations..(use additional pages as necessary)
cal /a l 0.77C)
L• bS /i a-z� �a�, `3
VIIA
Reviewer/I nspector Name ;.°u t , Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility'Number: — Date of Inspection
Rchuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. i n er
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application Q_*eekly Freeboard�aste Analysis 131oil Analysis
❑ Yes �Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'Z�5o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )2!6 El NA ❑NE
L --QVaste Transfers [Annual Certification
ainfall Otocking ,Qtrop Yield 4EfTll20 Minute Inspections El<onthly and I" Rain Inspections EMeather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permite
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were hig tan nonnal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air duality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of a ns as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes;91�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑N El NE
❑ Ye o S.Q❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No❑ NE
Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes�io ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes
//`` ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesX
❑ YeVo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Addidonal Comments and/or Drawings: -
12128104

® Division of Water Quality
=;adlityumber O 2 l 3 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency 4rtr
Type of Visit • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access .
O 1 0
AAAAA
Date of Visit: � lb� t 1 Arrival "Time: . 'parture Time: County: ��� Region:
Farm Name: G kOL P� `t`4.A'V\ � S Owner Email:
Owner Name:
W
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
f -
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: _ t. Integrator:
Certified Operator: _ ��yy ' ty��" `--- Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: _ . T _ Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ ° ❑ I ❑ [I Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ ❑
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
PC03
La er
Nan -La et
Dry Poultry
Laers
Nan-L
Pullets
LJ Turke Puults
❑ Other
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Piop
Mairy Cow
I 2 ID
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: Eh
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes bK.;Q- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoC%N'—'A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 'Xi ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYe ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection C�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
tructurp I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes JaTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �geA ❑ NE
Structure 5 -Structure 6
3. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any ot-the structures observed?
❑ Yes 'N_�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate.public health
or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Z]
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
. ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Fleavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) Ca� (\ (1Z_11Ials`� 11
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? []Yes'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes .leo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre detennination!❑ Yesj�o_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
a
;omtnents (refer,to.question #) ; Explain atiy, YES a&wers.and/or airy recomn
❑ Yes
❑ NE
:. - .ti.a._ "�:it. w :''.ia 5;'irt,-� T{.s::v m �1iC4`1�ia r,9§ • ,.,.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name l � z' ., Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12128104 Continued

'i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Alo ❑ NA ' ❑ NE'
20. Dges the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes. check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ecklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Otller
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
.J1 Waste Application ;2"weekly Freeboard 1;Maste Analysi Soil Analysis Waste Transfers'1 Annual Certification
P<aintal] Locking perlop Yield El.__ Minute Inspections 12<onthly and 1" Rain Inspections IffWeather Code
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the Facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �iA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? p[E2r�Nol ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No NIA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes _ 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �!A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 4 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document jes
es �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31, Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer enc ituations as required by ® ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, ov application
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 'pf,,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Commetits and/or Drawings:
� � y
4
�l
12128104

Division of Water Quality
r Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number ; 020013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCO20Q13 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Complia2gg Insoection Inactive or Closed Dale:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alexander _ Region: Mooresville _
Date of Visit: 03/09/2010 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 04-30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Chapman Farms Owner Email:
Owner: David W Chapman Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 280 Chapman Farm Ln _- Tavlorsville NC 28681
Physical Address: 280 Cha=U Farm Ln _ _ _ Tavlorsville NC 28681 _
Facility Status: N Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°56'40" Longitude: 81"12'41"
From the intersection of NC 90164 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church Rd.
The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: David W Chapman
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment
Other Issues
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman
W Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 20927
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Ile. Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
02/19/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.42 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/20/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.55 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/20/09 > Soil Analysis
H.
Page: 1

Permit: AVVCO20013 Owner - Facility: David WChapman Facility Number:020013
Inspection Date: 03109/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Rcutine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle - Milk Cow 250 241
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond WSP 18.00 48.00
et Stack WET STACK
Page: 2

Permit: AWCO20013 owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number : 020013
Inspection pate: 03/09/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
In
a. Was conveyance man-made?
nn■n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
Q
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
❑
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
!�
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWCO20013 owner -Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection bate: 03/0912010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? 0
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? In
Outside of acceptable crop window? 13
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1 Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4 Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management n ■ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? fl ■
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n ■ 0 l]
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Q ■ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ■ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

4
Permit: AWCO20013 Owner -Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 03/0912010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? n
Design?
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n i=l
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Cl
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
❑
■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n n
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■ 0
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n Cl
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n n
29, Did the facility fait to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those fl ■ n f I
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner -Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number : 020013
Inspection Date: 03I09t2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
rj Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 1 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCO20013 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CoMgli@are Inaggrtion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: R,iytire County: Algxa� nder Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 08/21/2009 Entry Time:04:00 PM Exit Time: 05:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Chapman FarmFarm§ Owner Email:
Owner: David W Chgpmgn
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2-10-C-hapman Farm Ln Taylorsville NC 28681
Physical Address: 280 Chapman Farm Ln
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
-If19L•7'�111Cai;LeYki
Latitude:35°56'40" Longitude: 81"12'41"
From the intersection of NC 90164 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church Rd.
The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: David W Chapman
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Operator Certification Number: 20927
On -Site Representative(s):
Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name
David W.
Chapman
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative
David W.
Chapman
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James 8 le Phone: [phone]Ex 2162
Inspector Signature: Date: 2t
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
08/19/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.80 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/27/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/09 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in August, 2009.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner -Facility; David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 08I2112009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 250 242
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 18.00 38.00
ket Stack WET STACK
Page: 2

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 08/21/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance lnspec£ion Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
MOD
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Inspection Date: 0$12112009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 020013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
i]
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1 _
Cam (Silage)
Crop Type 2 .
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
Q
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Q
■
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q
■
n
Q
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0
■
Q
Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
p
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Facility Number. 020013
Inspection Data: 08/21/2009 Inspection Type: Comptiance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
n
Maps?
❑
Other?
rE
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
. ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
fl
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stacking?
In
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
In
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
In
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead'animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: OW112009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes. contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Cl ■
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Cl ■ 0 n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Q ■ ❑ 0
Page: 6

. Division of Water Quality
_4 n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 020013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCO20013 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alexander Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 02/15/2008 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time:02:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Chaoman Farms Owner Email;
Owner: David W Chapman
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address:280-Chapman Farm Ln Taylorsville NC 28681
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°56'40" Longitude: 81°12'41"
From the intersection of NC 90/64 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church Rd.
The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David W Chapman Operator Certification Number: 20927
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:[phone]
Inspector Signature: Date: E 1 2
Secondary Inspector($):
Inspection Summary:
02/12/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 0,91 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/05/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.24 Lbsl1000 Gallons
03/24/07 > Soil Analysis
a
'! Page: 1

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 02/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 250 244
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350.000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond WSP 18.00 3&00
�et Stack WET STACK
Page: 2

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Dale: 02/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischames & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ D 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
n
Other
Q
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0
■
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
rl
❑
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry Q
■
Q
D
stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?'
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? J1
Hydraulic Overload? it
Frozen Ground? fl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? fl
Page: 3

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 02/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
- Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Q
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
0
Outside of acceptable crop window?
(!
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
Crop Type 4
Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
❑
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
p
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n`
■
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner -Facility: David W Chapman
'r Inspection Date: 02/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 020013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? n
Checklists? ❑
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ 0 11
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
171
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n ■ n
26. Did the facility fail to have an.actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
0' ■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ ❑ n
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Inspection Date: 02/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
n .
Facility Number : 020013
Reason for Visit: Routine i
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately,
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32, Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
0
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
■
n
n
Page: 6

#1 Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 020013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCO20013 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Coagoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine , , County: Alexander Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 11/301,2007 Entry Time:_03-aQ PM Exit Time: Q5Q0 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: ChaPmanDim Owner Email:
Owner: 12ayid W Chapman Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 280 Chaoman FarmTaylorsville NC 28681
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant E) Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 81°12'48"
From the intersection of NC 90164 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church Rd.
The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David W Chapman Operator Certification Number: 20927
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: -
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
10/05/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.24 Lbs/1000 Gallons
06/06/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.70 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/24/07 > Soil Analysis
Page: 1

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� —
Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility.Number: 020013 • .
Inspection Date: 11/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 250 226
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 18.00 48.00
Net Slack MT STACK
Page: 2

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 11/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
A
np■n
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (blot applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
■
❑
❑
❑■Qn
❑
■
❑
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
❑■n❑
0■❑❑
n
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Inspection Date: 11/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 020013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
n
If yes,.check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

4f Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number., 020013
Inspection Date: 11/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WU P? ❑l
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑ .
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 ■ n 0
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 11/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the, facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ n
Quality representative immediately.
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Q ■ Q D
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ■ 0 0
Page: 6

d'
❑ Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Q 0013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCO20013 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Ogeratfona Review _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoWtine County: Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 08/01/2007 Entry Time:03-10 PM _ Exit Time: 04:20 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner: David W Chapman Phone:
Mailing Address: 280 Chapman Farm_Ln ___ Taylorsville NC 28681
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 81°12'48"
From the intersection of NC 90164 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church Rd.
The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: David W Chapman Operator Certification Number: 20927
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Cindy Safrit Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: 6/6/2007 - 0.7 IbN11000gal WSP
4.41bNlton scrape
Soil samples: 3/24/2007
24) Bill has ordered a flow meter and plans to calibrate at next application.
Tract 9643 field 1 has been added to the WUP, Thanks.
Farm and records are in excellent condition.
Page: 1

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 08/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 250 F 206
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
taste Pond WSP 18.00 36,01
let Stack WET STACK
Page: 2

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 08/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Q
Application Field
n
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
Cl
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
Q
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
o
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
❑
n
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

4
Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 08/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Cecil sandy clay loam,
2 to 8 /o slopes, e
Soil Type 2
Pacolet sander clay
loam, 8 to 15 /o slopes
Soil Type 3
Dogue sandy loam, 2 to
6% slopes, rarely
Soil Type 4
Riverview fine sandy
loam, 0 to 2% slope
Soil Type 5
T
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
.❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Q
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 08/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Wt1P? [l
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
0
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ n ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Facility Number: 020013 ti
Inspection Date: 08/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues I
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
Q
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlnspection with on -site representative?
❑
■
❑
Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
Q
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 020013 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCO20013 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection - Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Boutin@ County: Alexandgr Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/28/2006 Entry Time:Q2:.QQ PM Exit Time: 03-00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Chapman Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: Qavid W QhgQMan Phone: 828-6az-3129
Mailing Address: 280-Chapman Tgvlorsville NC 2, a81
Physical Address:
Facility Status: M Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*56'36" Longitude: Q1"12'48"
From the intersection of NC 90/64 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks Church Rd.
The farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David W Chapman Operator Certification Number: 20927
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative David W. Chapman
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name David W. Chapman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: tvt ::c�OtG
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
11/13/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.55 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/22/06 > Waste Ana}ysis > N = 0.87 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/10/06 > Soil Analysis
8
Page: 1

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number : 020013
Inspection Date: 12t28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 250 232
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 18.00 42.00
Net Stack WET STACK
Page: 2
t

Pormit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 12/28/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Cl
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
❑
■
❑ .
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le) large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
00
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
❑
0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
■
❑
0
improvement?
Waste AppIicatljqn
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
Cl
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
[1
■
0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
In
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman
Facility Number; 020013
Inspection Date: 12128/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason far Visit: Routine
Waste A _plicatfon
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? '
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4 Timothy, Orchard, 8
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
1& Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
o
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4
t

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner -Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013
Inspection Date: 12/28/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? Q
Checklists? ❑
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ n
If yes, check the appropriate box beiow,
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
.n
❑
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
❑
n
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
❑
■
I I
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
n
■
❑
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWCO20013 Owner - Facility: David W Chapman Facility Number: 020013 `
Inspection Date: 1212W006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? n ■ 0 0
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fait to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■❑0
❑■00
Page: 6

Al
1!
Type of Visit ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 16Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: �,y Departure Time: County: Altro It Region:%"�"o
Farm Name: [/11+��rl�I1S Owner Email:
Owner Name: ►D;l� t�'lfM4}? Phone:
Mailing Address: A7[ 56 S9
Physical Address: ��r
Facility Contact: �f � !� Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: olw
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedei
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: 2 O 1217
Bach -up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = i adi Longitude: = ° = 6 ❑
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
Dairy Cow
v
'.P4
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy HeifeE
❑
Da Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Caw
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: =;
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
14No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

L Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
t& No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier-. w Mid P•+,� 1
Spillway?: 445
Designed Freeboard (in): t 4%
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes K] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ZZ C [oRN Se-4I
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name rY,,\� t h -`— _` `' l Phone:
Reviewer/inspectorSignature: y '� Date: IQ -\A- a5
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z — a Date of inspection IA-fl- pS
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes S9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
L2 NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
[:1 NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
IF] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
V] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
A°dditional Comments and1,44',awings
o•ay "" g: SL ~, b a d:3A
t.7
a-'7
1.16
u.ell — kePt
12128104

1Y�' €°v�j
6h-� :W EYl1d Ptir �QiYie
$ I� DU
genes�
Q.-\/[ilerAy, y£
.�%: 9°{: ° tE�`"dya.,}@€ :7 - E•.:S €:° E s r -?�
,€atse�'
Type of Visit V Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number f Date of visit: td' �'�`r Tune: 0
Q Not Operational_ Q Below Threshaid
® Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ...Q� `.t.".`.''.. T:- —541.. Fkt1`.................................................................... County: "lei!!!' 4x
.............................................
OwnerName: ..... .�!1^......C�!.TM�................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress: ............................................................................................. . . .................... .....................................................................................
Facility Contact: ..... A!t....5 +.'T.'.'.`.'!'.'......................................... Title: 1.)= `"'r`!Afi :!ff�t rt...................... Phone No:...................................................
ri ;
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:........... ( ................................ ..... .... .................... ........................ I................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ' it Longitude 4 it
fly€ k Design CUITent € ; r Design i� C_iil'reElt ' ' Design ('u' rrent��
Swine �,, Ca'aci` "';Po eilaan=,`Poultry„ Fib �'Ca' act aPo'tiiadan�°.Cattle a ° �._Ca`'aci�1?0 u[ation f
n
❑ Wean to Feeder' ❑ Layer Dairy
® rY �av I�
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to Feeder ❑Other k ,� $
Farrow to Finish Capi6ty
Gilts
[3
Boars y'F aTota� SSLW
w
;� a'° �.;YU� ° ' a�t 2�,,� F..f E g_ ¢ °§.� ya•� f � _ k �{ _.
=Number of Lego©ns� E'
Discharges & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes to No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......... I ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
Frechoard (inches): :3 0
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: — 3 Date of Inspection 55- 0- °
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
© No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
El No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
© No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
© No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
© No
Odor ],sues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes © No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes 19 No
Air Quality representative immediately.
la
<s. .li:r4 e y �' i s
t u'� 'Y 1'
Reviewer/Inspector Name '_D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
iESaiiswers:iilind/or any.:recommendatios
ions. (use additional pag6'as neeesssary)s
r any other comments:
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date: _10- U—vql
12112103 Continued

Facility Numbers <A - 1,3 Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Document.~
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Farm ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

a; v '°"� 'r1� - �� +.�.� �S', .w r Jrr. a i _ +w.#. F � r*Y .,�r.f . �x`5 " ,} : �. !'r ;T' .t -may,' r
t ._
wArE9
QG
71
Mr. Bill Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Ln.
Taylorsville, NC 28581
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Michael F. E y, Govemar
WiMam G. Ross. Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department •of,Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Vlr. Klimelc,.P.E., Director
bivision of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 30, 2003
Subject: Chapman Dairy Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWCO20013
Alexander County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June 25,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained, and the
records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
m
t+lD
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, (Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 877.823-6748 FAX (704) 66M040

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 02 13 Date of Visit: 06/25/2003 'rime:
NNot Operational Q Bclow "Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Abov a "I'hr eshnld:
Farm Fame: Chap=IUL t'arms............. .... County'-. A&Cxapliar............................... D MQ........
Owner Name: dill---- ------------- -._ �hap�.------------------------ Phone No: ---------
Mailing Address: 2,$9..C.twp.mam.F,9rl]t.LM9 .............................................................. T.ty Qr$.Y.Ul9..NYC........................... ��S$�..............
FacilityContact: ...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: ML.CHAP1 IAX.--------------------------------- Inlegralor:------------------------------ -----
Certified Operator:!'J?p,Y.ld.!'f..:"..HILL........... UtALtpllA&........................................ Operator Certification Nttmbet•:z092,7........-
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of NC 90/64 West and Three Forks Church Rd. (SR 1313) . Travel north (2 miles) on Three Forks
E�hurch Rd. The farm is on the right.
❑ Swine ©Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude F 35 • 56 36 Lnngitude 81 • 12 48
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population , , poultry Capacity, Population Cattle Capacity, Population
❑ Wean to Feeder w ❑ Layer ® Dairy 250 215
❑ Feeder to Finish . ❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean -'• _ :r. f�;; _ ,:r-. _
Farrow to Feeder 10_Other I
'Desigri'Capa
El Farrow to Finish��- ' `Totalcity 250
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Jotal SSLW 350,000
Number- .'of Lagoons... =; 1 y - ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spra}' Field Area
v..t:. Holding -Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ Na Liquid Waste Management System -
Dischar•t_jes & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance matt -made?
b. li'discharg,e is observed, did it reach,) ater of the State'! (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. li'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flog in gal/Min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
«Vasty Collection & "Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Stntcture 6
Identifier: ...................... ................................ .......................... ..----..................... ............................ ........................
Freeboard (inches): 24
nein2inr
/'..ems..... w.7

gy Myi�3 , � � .,.Y L
r. 17r r,�
i � �f" �,r ML ; � .. � �5 -.{ �-�' 1✓4.n�I �� �J fiH• S r n�y.�{• ]
(••.t"M. ,]�S �L ... -�. r 1 ,,i r.�l ,�`l+ lYr r ��, - 3
?_
r
r i.vuauriscu
Facility Number:
02-13
Date of Inspection 06/25/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, -severe erosion, 0 Yes N No
seepage, etc.) z
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Analication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? I ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Docunients
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes,
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
aw SS>,F' "'�3A5 Mi :•t'":'L;AAIriYigHlr,41';4�3r.�tv'i'_F-`LYx'1 - ' -.
Co en (refer�uestia . Explalb gy�tYES ansjvers andlorrany recoQtmendationsror any ath ea enta.
?
1.
-Us s i,fa-; to be erreipl nWs'situ tions.,(�us�e a diga al p g s n cess )�
, - ❑Field Copy El Final Notes
:. W
E FACILITY WAS WELL OPERATED AND MAINTAINED, AND THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
p Alan'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z
v

,., �lflJ
0 W A rFq Michael F. Easley
,O= Q Governor
pj William G. Ross, Jr„Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 r Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 2, 2001
Bill Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Ln.
Talylorsville, NC 28581
Subject: Chapman Dairy Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWCO20013
Alexander County, NC
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 31
2001. Based on his observation made during the inspection, the facility appeared to be well
operated and maintained: and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection
reports, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
'&*A
0DENOR
Customer Service
1 800 623.7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
�a
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

M4..W-- "7a�°�tr
_ ���IVJStOQd1�� YY
t;^F�`� er 4 •'3�1��-,r.-t�i '� �rrr.
[c�?yY' _
'.i ..r, .,�,K ,n 7+;,, . 4„ �,� '�.r.+i;'r, T .:-r +".! •,_.-.:::�.�srJ_ ",'t^L''—' �:'':tt. _ .-.n,.._ �-
Type of Visit Q�Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit IR Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
P ]late of Visit: Time: 1r 2-01
Facility Number '� / E
Q Not C?perational Q Belo-w Threshold
Q Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
..........
Farm Name: .......................... :/ - ........ � ..'.�.. County: ............ ..... . ........../..'�:Fit..............................
t.....................................
OwnerName: .................... L , /1 ................................... Phone No:.........................................................................
FacilityContact: .................. .......... I ................... ............................... Title: ................................ Phone No:....................................................
� '3.�.' .............L....7...' t..-:-1%J.'7. 4;.�7........j `:rh:-i......f.it7.............VuiIinAddress: ^..c..................I... /:i' 4:!f............... , p
..:.... .. �J....
Onsite Representative: •....i
...... a.1....................................... InteYrator..................................................................
Certified Operator:. ........ ��11................. �j1 .f�: ..e ...................... Operator Certification Number: .........................
�....
Location of Farm -
A.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude • � �11
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Poultry y Poulaion CttlepCapacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Laver I - ____dRDairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars 'TotaLSSLW
-Number oMagoons : ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spruy Field Area
HoldingRondsl,Solid Traps / : ❑ Na Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges cC Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 2Q No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is nhscrved, did it reach Water of the Statc? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
L. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon sYstcm? (If yes, nMifv DWQi) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from an), part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes a -No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection �y
'% aste Collection cC Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage} less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
,[j No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inchcs): .._.........1,.............................................. ............................ .................................... .... ................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
RNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
El Yes
n No
(if anyof questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Pj�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
allo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
K1 No
I 'asty Application
10. Are there arty buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
MNo
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN I—] Hydraulic Overioad
❑Yes
EJ`No
12, Crop type C_c / -"1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Z'No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
KLNo
17. Are roc ' tcr�ops present?
ElYes
❑ No
18. Is there aa-cG ter supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records S Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit -readily available?
❑ Yes
QNo
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
Z_No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑No
22, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
0 No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
qNo
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
fie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
0 No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
EkNo
01/01/01
Continued

Iwaciiity Number: _ Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt. ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
33, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pertnanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments.(ref&Ao-questiion #):_.Ezplain�any YES answers an ariy recommends ons ar any ott er comments.:•-=, LL
Use drawings ofsfacility t6 better explain situations (useadditional-,pages,as necessary):: 0 Ficld Copy ❑Final Notes
4- /9
.4
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:Date:
01/01/01 `/

C
NORTH CAROL[NA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 12, 1998
Bill Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Ln.
Taylorsville, NC 28581
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Chapman Farms, Facility #: 2-13
Alexander County, NC
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
March 10, 1998. It was noted that the graveled area responsible for filtering surface water
runoff from the paved lot apparently no longer performs as intended. A Notice of
Deficiency (NOD) is being issued for this failure.
In addition to the noted deficiency, a buffer strip must be provided along the
stream bank in the dry cow lot. Also, the feeding area next to the well house needs to be
relocated or improvements made to maintain vegetation along the stream bank.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D.
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Alexander SWCD
AJ
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 l S
PHONE [phone] >FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
ivision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
J§LRoutine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
LFacility Number ! Date of Inspection
___ - .._ .. _ �� Time of Inspection tT/-Y� 24 hr. (hh.-mm}
❑ Permitted §Certified © Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered [3 Not Operational I Date Lust Operated:
Farm Name: .................L�..........
..............
C aunty:.............
.... '�.......................
Owner Name: t
.......... �.....................
C.7,t4v�
..�.... ... ..
Phone �fo:
3z ~ 1 Z
............ ................. .......................
Facility Contact: ......................................................................
.. Title:
.... Phone No: ...
.Mailing Address.-L5'lb CA\a►--Vyr"V-.-).......
............
............ �....�.�.L�.r,�..�1.►.l..l�.........................
.7.................. l...
Onsite Representative: ............. //..............�r��c�?.i,F1�
.....
lnterrator:
.......................................,. ...........
�.
Certified Operator: ................tiJ 1.
"Aak1.n.,p .......
Operator Certification Number ....... ►`Z.0 Z7............
tion of Farm: '
ude 0 �° �^ Longitude • C71 '
Design Current
Swine CaDaeitV PODulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JE3 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
,Number of Lagoons JEI Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Nlanagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )kNo
Discharge originated ;tv ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, li' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'' ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, noti fy DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 'Spillway ❑ Yes RNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches); . ✓
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hack

•
Facility Number: —
Date of inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ref No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yest Na
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes �No
12. Crop type 1M. Iq 42 &Z'id CA r
13.• Do the receiving crops differ wit those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes q10
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑`Yes ❑ No-
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
[]Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes Aq No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes r--bNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes IV No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes 14No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ANo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 9 No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes AO No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ] No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
No.'violafibt s;or &rjciencies were jh ec1• il(rr'iAg �bisMsit; - Y;ojj wJ1j-teeeiye lid fuicthgr
correspondence. alloui" the visit.
Comments.(refer to questi.oa #):' Explain any 'YES'answers and/or -any recommendations or any other comments.'
Use drawings of facility to better exp[ain'situafh _ (use additional pages as necessary):
ee I� vs �rY� e �Yi c y 0. L n r� R h o
Name ector Reviewer/Insp µ' `Y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �? G� _ Date:'
3/23/99

• Facility Number: -- Date of Isispection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes XNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes E' -No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ONo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) []Yes WNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 4�No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes Nlu
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Dear Landowners and Producers,
1 • •
--NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 19, 2000
Subject: Inventory and Assessment
Inactive Animal Waste Management Lagoons
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTh
& NATURAL RESOURCM
FEB 4 2000
IMSION OF ENVIRJRNENTAt MMANAGEIMIENT
VOORESVIt1E REGIONA1 OFFICE
In 1999, the North Carolina General Assembly passed legislation that required the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to locate and evaluate every inactive animal waste lagoon
in the state. Inactive lagoons were defined as those that have not received animal waste for at least one
year. This legislation requires that this inventory be completed and the results reported back to the
General Assembly within the next few months.
DENR has directed that the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and the Division of Water Quality
work together and complete this inventory and evaluation.
Our records indicate that an inactive lagoon may be located on land that you own or on which you have
previously raised animals. Due to this requirement to locate and evaluate all inactive lagoons, staff from
our Divisions will be contacting you to arrange a visit to your site to determine if an inactive lagoon
does in fact exist. If a lagoon is located, our staff is also required to gather information on the condition
of the lagoon and its potential to cause problems to the waters of the state.
We greatly appreciate your assistance in helping us meet this legislative requirement. We will make
every effort to minimize any inconvenience that this effort may cause you and we will complete our
work as quickly as possible.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the staff in our Mooresville Regional Office
at 704/663-1699. Please ask for someone with either our Division of Soil and Water Conservation staff
or our Division of Water Quality staff.
Sincerely,
David Vogel, Director
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Ken T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/] 0% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Bill Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville NC 28581
Dear Bill Chapman:
A74�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURGi*S
w.c. t]lA pr. 6.4
MfMONMENT, MAO%
December 30, 1999 l4 NATURa r. 1;Fr90URc1A
MAN 10 2000
031N OF liiVt+ MMEMTAt UNARM["
ggffo tf RE6 RA1 emu
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 2-13
Alexander County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
7 Kerr T. Stevens, Director
/---Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Alexander County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

J.g
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR ,�':
GOVERNOR
rr f•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILI-E REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 4, 1999
Bill Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28581
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Chapman Farms, Facility #: 2-13
Alexander County, NC
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August
3, 1999. Facility appeared to be in good shape. Be sure to obtain a site diagram of your
facility and certification form for your files.
Please note that during many of Mr. Johnson's inspections die has noted that some
farms are often missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for
review. The following items must be available for review by the inspector during the
inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas must be shown.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice
of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should be
made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general waste should
be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. L-'r
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File 919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2811E
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLEO110% POUT -CONSUMER PAPER
.-r

J 0 Division of Soil and Water°Conservation -°Operation Review
,w [3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation' -.Compliance inspection _.
' J;DiAsion of Watert`uality - Compliance Inspection
13 Other Agency - OperationReview
I§LRoutine 0 Complaint Q Fallow -up of DWQ inspection Q Follow ---up of DSWC review Q Other_
Facility Number "Z Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted J4 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered rNot Operational Date Last Operated:
A /.
Farm Name: .................M4.. L' tr..., r.... County:...../.7.Ir' x.Cr.�1.ee...................................
Owner Name: .............Af:�l.J................................G�F77�i.,F2............................ Phone Not .......K. ...�.... ���..�.�........................ ..... ......
FacilityContact: ................................................................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ..........,��.$ �.........C� .(�.f.�3 Y,f�r� ex........I.r ...��..................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.........: .fir, ......... C c:�3Ff-�4. ......... .... Operator Certification Number:.... C3�'Z.?
Lo • Lion of Farm:
A
....... ............. .......... .. .... ................... r
rtude �'�� �•� Longitude �• �� �i�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine,;, Capacity PopulationPoultry' Capacit� PopulationQatle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer 2 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ' ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean 17
❑ Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts.
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IQ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes &No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes '%No
Structure 1 Structurc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ..........�2 ............................................. .................................... ...................... I............ ...................................................... I...............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.) P,
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type (2.4.5
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes J�LNo
❑ Yes fig -No
❑ Yes 7MNo
—
❑ Yes CZ'No
❑ Yes g No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes $<No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ��❑l No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fai I to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'Vo •yioEalticjttjs'o� dgf�c�tznctes •rr�re �Qtie�1• ¢�tr'ing th�s:visit= • wits •t�ee�iye �ti fpi't���; • '
corresp6 - de" ' A6o f this visit.:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9,No
fizLyes ❑ No
'I:" � s "�E ti 1iTP 7 NS.flia 3 �saE4r € [i®I 1b ,:. . -PP� t
Use drawn of faciht , to better ex ialn sttuateoas use addit:onal pages as necessary), r-e .
C,ornments (refer to;questtorn #�) ,Explain any YES ansWrrsraan�dlor any recommendations or any other comments
Y •r
C�✓{-.Yt1` car` /r r~WL 1/L��_. y
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,& No
❑ Yes `JQ o
❑ Yes .ZNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes->Q No
❑ Yes�No
Reviewer/Inspector Name .9� , s ci �, Date:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �, A J 16 4
3/23/99

1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL. OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 18, 1998
Bill Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28581
Subject: Site Inspection
Chapman Farms, Facility #:
Alexander County, NC
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste apRlications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or Bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
910 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVI LLE, NORTH CAROLI NA 28113
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLE011 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

i
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Ni pZen M A-pplication for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in rune and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be -
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste sampleslanalysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample: The sample should be refrigerated if it is lot going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
n. t).��....�
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
�} Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Alexander SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
1' 1
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MAR 24 1990
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number '=� - � 3
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
W�-eR r e c Zc�-
LILN L-k -e- v�, 01 (dh "r !
F".A1*'L IZ_/9V
zz'
e'(CV\
2
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-053S Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): r,9 11 I 'Ckq,2rti�+r�
2. Facility No.: 13
3. Facility Name: S
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
5. Mailing Address: U l:h cafes.
City: T� oY_1)6I e _ _ State: NL Zip:.
Telephone No.: (2-01Z-) _. �302- 31,11
6. County where facility is located: AZekandrt
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): &LW1e _
S. Application Date: 3— 3 - 9 1? -
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into'a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 1 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implen)ent a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as'a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
i
IYti• Aw-4-Lu fz ==vU&&
J O'A
9 %TaJa
Applicant's Certification: /ete k o/ co•-191,ele Aec� ?�/..a o/u c o
�romk AIW 5 F ;raft.
I, J 11 m4A— , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with�the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if al equired_parts of this application are not completed and if all
General Statutes and Regulations. I understand that the failure to meet any -dates that area reed
upon by myself and the EMC will result in appropriate enforcement acti ns being taken by the
EMC.
f�l
Print Name of Owner
nc a #I-
1�9 -
Date 3
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Fundsexpended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
S�GD
/ d S s a w e... d-*• � r
e- ea s s kd r .
f a
'f %6A0
r
0 SAo, 8 a�
/n y
FORAM SPAG 1/98
'14/G
�s�, /%00*�/,Xy
9"w.° el
r u..,. —a 47
Page 2 of 4

"..Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a.certified,animal
wasfe management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include;
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Fundsexpended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
ve ` a o
jf1q,PO4,0,V a a�e /
ts/oq r
FORM S PA G 1/98
rC_
o� D wrj/L�
Page 2 of 4
ee_
l

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bill Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Ln
Taylorsville NC 28581
Dear Bill Chapman:
ffl-?3A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
.. 713
July 17, 1998� ``
JUL - V) iy98
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Chapman Farms
Facility Number: 2-13
Alexander County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on March 18, 1998, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Bill Chapman in order to allow
additional time for Bill Chapman to obtain and implement a certified animal waste management
plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SO% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 571or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 57I.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF ALEXANDER
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 2-8
LINDSEY KIRBY
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Lindsey Kirby, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 2-8
Special Agreement
.ti Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) . No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 2-8
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special. Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Idlenot Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

i State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Bill Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Ln
Taylorsville NC 28581
Dear Bill Chapman:
NCDENR
NORTH GRouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
s'
September 4, 1998 tm D,tvr. ()Jr
& 14A7URAL F{ i:�ivE:CF
SEp 10 1998
ME04 Of iy7i�f "ft3i�i �t iJ1
E!
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 2-13
Chapman Farms
Alexander County
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
/14/ lviv--3
A- Preston Howard, Jr.,P.E. rdJrP
ATTACHMENTS
cc: [MRO=Regional _Office
Alexander County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Central Files
Shannon Langley
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Atnrmative Action Employer $0% recycled110% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF ALEXANDER
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 2-13
BILL CHAPMAN
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Bill Chapman, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",
and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State
of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15ANCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the Commission
as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects of
the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a
contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 2-13
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

r
Farm Number: 2-13
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
S. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Chapman Farms
1s i I!
Print Name of Owner
Date 6:�&
g
Signature of Owner IV If
For the North Carolina nvironmental Management Commission:
Date
pp, Chairman of the Commis

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 12, 1998
Bill Chapman
280 Chapman Farm Ln.
Taylorsville, NC 28581
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Chapman Farms, Facility #: 2-13
Alexander County, NC
Dear Mr. Chapman:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
March 10, 1998. It was noted that the graveled area responsible for filtering surface water
runoff from the paved lot apparently no longer performs as intended. A Notice of
Deficiency (NOD) is being issued for this failure.
In addition to the noted deficiency, a buffer strip must be provided along the
stream bank in the dry cow lot. Also, the feeding area next to the well house needs to be
relocated or improvements made to maintain vegetation along the stream bank.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Alexander SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOR E9VILLE, NORTH CAROLIN^ 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division of Soil and Water Conservation [j Other Agency
Wivision of Water Quality
outine O Complaint ' O Follow-u 'of DAVQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of lnspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection. ( 24 hr. (hh:mm)
gistered © Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
4'1... { County: Lf r .4 .......
Farm Name:....... .. �f/h�G�/.L..............7.:C%e`.t�lr.��.............................................. y' .......................
Owner Name: ............. �.t..��.............................................................. Phone No:
.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: wax -.,a,....... s� 1p!! .4J.1................................. .... �..
1
Onsite Representative :......l�".C..L.......... /�....... ....r................................ Integrator:................
�............Dy .......................... Operator Certification Number... Operator:........ r a...........
Location of Farm:
kTfS.....I.41 Cd.......... 8 .Y. i ...... 1.31-3....... ........
�z. .. ... ..w,i ...�........................................
Latitude • =11 =11 Longitude =• 0' ®"
Design F Current ,
rr ; 'Design Current Design : Current y
Swme Capacity°Population. '
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 layer
iry
ZC7
s
❑ Feeder to Finish
JE1 Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑Other Q
El Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
a
❑Gilts
3 ;'
� ta1uSSLW
❑ $oars
Number of Lagoons / Holding 1'ands
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
.....
Y No Liquid Waste Management System'
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
bkYes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
b3.No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
10No
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
,kNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
,"No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
JR No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
VNo
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'! ❑ Ye No
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure h
Identifier. ............................................................
.................
.........
.....................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft): ............. ...............................................................................................,..........................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'! ❑ Yes ❑ No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D%VQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application"
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, no if DWQ)
15. Crop type .......... ..//....1!Pl.......... r.................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)'?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency`'
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'!
For Certified or Pennittcd_Facilities Only lv/�
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the�An'imal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'!
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [ `*o
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
,� No
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
�INo
❑ Yes
4\'o '
❑ Yes,-)KTINo
0 No violations or. d'icieneies were noted during this. visit.- Youmlll receive no further
correspondence about this.visit:-
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Coniiuents (refer to question #) >Explain any YES aiiswers andicir anv recommendations or:any other comments.
Use i3rawtngs of fiicihty to better explain "situations (usc additional pages iicce�sary) us
s . h as .
vhr
� _5 `�S U \1'Zt�OtNC� 1. p� lb 4` I
t..s b �,pDut c�` o Ue< 4({�- r&_M bo.,tn� 1 n
`I�ter a rem /Gc� t.re�� �c�ufe LO k1ev?__ CO _S Q t'�- t e� Vhu.�� �e� � ►r p
ov `4�,✓ cr,�;s tn�.�tr�e� sp �f `1�,,� �-��e.�7 �'�•� -ci la 5��.���-��,t,` br�.,•/l� .
f 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name1 M6,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bill Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Ln
Taylorsville NC 28581
Dear Bill Chapman:
1 � �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
N.C. LT" 'T. C1M
& NA-LU.._,.. .....,�t
FEB 17 1990
0116MVI OF
::....:tE RE: ,Ikl OFFICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Chapman Farms
Facility Number: 2-13
Alexander County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 214.0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
subnutted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleieh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue, if you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc; Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

.{f b
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources { •
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary IDF.=HNF;Z
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Bill Chapman
Rt. 4 Box 108
Taylorsville, NC 28581
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Chapman Farms
AIexander County, NC
Dear Mr. Chapman:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, * FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Nof C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmotive Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10°b post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D.`lrex'Go
Water Quality egional Supervisor
cc: Alexander SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Bill Chapman
' Chapman Farms
Rt 4 Box 108
Taylorsville NC 28581
Dear Mr. Chapman:
IDEEHNF;Z
N.C. DEPT, of
ENVIRONMENT, FIE NLT M
NATURAL. RESUU.yCt:.S
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DEC 17 1996
Facility: Chapman Farms
Facility ID #: 2-13 DIVISION OF ENVIfiONMEI#IAt IIVIA6£EiEHr
Alexander County NOORESVIIIE RECIOtIAI OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on ,Tune 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System q;C
Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commisslon rAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P,O, Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Yi '' c.f Nor-, � .rt���no
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Bill Chapman
280 Champman Farm Lane.
Taylorsville, NC 28581
Dear Mr. Chapman:
o
DMSION OF WATER QUAL=
MARCH 3, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Chapman Farms, Facility #: 2-13
Alexander County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on February 26, 1997 by
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental laws and regulations.
The facility appeared to be in good condition. The improvements you described during your
conversation with Mr. Johnson seem appropriate for your operation.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. If you
have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704)
663-1699,
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gle /nP..
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Alexander County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, N�►�y� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 �� An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmotive Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Y [3 DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review h f
;.. i. .r,.; k &.3 F }..y'; j F s ,l r^ `l 4" I•i 73- Nf Yr .Fs s ^l'H ;
y �DWQyAnimal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection r;
Routine O Complaint O Follow-u of DW1' ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection a
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
.._.._....li'ir..C.. _ »..».,,» _...,, or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: _,.».».. ... YY] Gti Gl»....................._ ............. » .._ ....._ ......... County:. _f ti.T�. l Q.r> �.� .._ .........».....».............
OwnerName:.... L!._....�1�:h. �._.�.._. _.». PhoneNo:.�l.;
Mailing Address: � ya)--�:�i
Onsite Representative: _ .�L1._.......� l)~lC�.t�}-......... ... .._ .... integ[rator:.. ».�....._......._....._-......_.._W....�....
Certified Operator: _.... _ ....� .._ . .._ ... _..._.. ...».._.....w Operator Certification Number: _ ........ ............ ..........
_ ..
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
+
[3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
i ype w operation ana liesign c:apaciry
Swine
Number Poultry Number
Cattle
::,`-`;Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
"�"AfkDairy
I k O
j»
❑ Feeder to Finish
"'
❑ Non -La er
;
IQ Beef
N
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Y
Farrow to Finish
s ❑ Other Type of Livestock
r
Number of Ligoons / Holding Ponds," +. '
n { ` ❑Subsurface Drains Present ,
❑ Lagoon Area w ❑ Spray Field Area
General
i. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes OfNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed„ did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? )M Yes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Q No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes PqNo
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes 191No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes JRNo
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds ,t #
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? /" ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
R'aste AaalLeation A/4
14• Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waiters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type __ . _................�.... _..... %�!�At4'�v`.�i^......... _ ................
...._...._..... ....
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
Comments (refer to question #): , Explain,any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional,pages as necessary
❑ Yes b No
❑ Yes CKNO
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes MNO
❑ Yes [RNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [--]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
fl9rr L�`t��fitGvt LlS�S Q
se��•�
7,/
_r4e_v'G. k1ca5 eat c\cuce— ut cL tas�— e1isc l cu-y vA r,5 6cts; r1 . (mac 3
15 �e,r�, GJKV-e_s1SCA,,
Reiiewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date: —__26i rf
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Qualit), Section acility Assessment Unit 1 1/14/96

�OF W A TFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
O William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
'r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Q �
October 1, 2004 '
Bill Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville NC 28581
,t
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWCO20013
Chapman Farms
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Alexander County
Dear Bill Chapman:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 14, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Bill
Chapman, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWCO20013 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Chapman Farms, located in Alexander County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 250 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitorin conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NofthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]Internet: h2o,enr.state.nc,us �atura���
An Equal OpportunitylAfBrmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper u

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in.the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ec's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Alexander County Health Department
Alexander County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWCO20013
APS Central Files

OF W A 7-FR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Willi Moss Jr., Secretary
m
North Carolina Department of Environm tlmulaw
Amn
AIan�W: Klimek,.P. E.,;Directoi,
0
Dwiston'of %49fer dual q FF1CV
May 1, 2003 t WAY 19 2003
Bill Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville NC 28581
nq��r
PJATR
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWCO20013
Chapman Farms
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Alexander County
Dear Bill Chapman:
On April 28,. 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 14, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Bill
Chapman, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWCO20013 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Chapman. Farms, located in Alexander County, with an animal capacity' of no
greater than an annual average of 250 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show'that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. M
amm
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet h1tpJm2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area Qf a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC i5 not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone], If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
zde
for Alan W. Klimek, Q.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Alexander County Health Department
Alexander County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWCO20013
NDPU Files

CHAPMAN DAIRY FARM
(BILL CHAPMAN)
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
October 15, 2001
Revised October 31, 2001
PREPARED BY THE
ALEXANDER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
AND
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
1

Producer: Bill Chapman Chapman Farms
Location: Three Forks Church Rd. ( SR 1313 )
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
Jersey Dairy.
250 milking cows
Storage Structure($): Waste Storage Pond & Drystack
Application Method(s): Irrigation & Broadcast Land Application
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
You must have the animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content
as close to the time of application as practical and at least within
60 days of the date of application before each application cycle.
Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must be
analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced
for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
OA

Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Lime must be
applied to application fields as recommended by soil test to
maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, (see Required Specification No. 4) waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation
of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
.0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste
should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and
to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be
applied to a growing crop. Otherwise apply waste no
earlier than 30 days prior to planting a crop or prior to
forages breaking dormancy. Injecting or otherwise
incorporating the waste below the soil surface will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where
waste is applied shall be monitored and alternative
application fields shall be used when these metals approach
excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by (Irrigation/Broadcast) for
this is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. if
you choose to alter the method(s) of application in the future, you
3

need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various waste
application methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste are based on
typical nutrient content for Dairy systems in North Carolina. Actual
acreage requirements shall be based on waste analysis reports from
storage structures in your waste management system. Attached you will
find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and
transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your DRYSTACK & WASTE HOLDING POND are designed for 9Q days of
temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 3 mo. If your facility is unroofed, in no
instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure be
higher than the maximum storage marker except in the event of a 25
year, 24 hour storm.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Only persons who hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of
an animal waste management system shall operate the waste management
system, which is covered by this waste utilization plan. The North
Carolina Water Quality Commission will provide training and
certification of operators.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the
Water Quality Commission.
4

AMOUNT OF SOLID WASTE PRODUCED/YEAR
250 milk cows X 17tons of waste/animal/year = 4,250 tonsWaste ear
= 1,020,000 gallons/waste/year
AMOUNT OF LIQUID WASTE PRODUCED/YEAR FROM MILK ROOM _AND _LOT RUNOFF.
250 milk cows X 5 gallons/cow/day X 365 days =456 250 gallons
LOT RUNOFF IS APPROXIMATELY 274,189„gallons/year
TOTAL ANIMAL WASTE AND WASTE WATER VOLUME GENERATED IN ONE YEAR IS
APPROXIMATELY 4,250 tons solid waste and 730,439 gallons or 26.89 acre/inches
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PAN PRODUCED/YEAR FROM LIQUID WASTE
730,439 gallons of waste X 2.5 lba.PAN/1000 gallons/waste
= 1,826 lbs. PAN/year
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED/YEAR FROM SOLID WASTE.
4,250 Tons of waste X 4.3 lbs. PAN/year
18,275 lbs. PAN/year
5

Total animal waste and waste water volume generated in one year is
approximately 4,250 tons and
730,439 gallons or 26.89 acre -inches.
1,826 lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
+ 18,275 lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
= 20,101 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
values used above are based on analysis of waste from similar
livestock operations in North Carolina (source: USDA-NRCS FOTG
Practice Standard 633-Waste Utilization). Actual nutrient
content of the waste from this system may vary from these
values. Waste analysis should be made of the actual waste as
soon as possible after significant waste accumulates in the
storage structure(s).
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North
Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
R

The irrigation application rate should not exceed the infiltration rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is
limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water
droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the
available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor
should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
It is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that
an irrigation system is installed, too properly irrigate the acres shown in
tables 1 through 3. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying forage plants under stress
condition. Nitrate poisoning may occur in livestock. Sampling forages or hays
for nitrate levels is recommended.
7

WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are available
for waste application. It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to
apply waste to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual nitrogen
(N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the potential productivity of
the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the Nitrogen that can
be reasonably applied to the crop and used by the crop in a timely manner using
animal waste alone. It will not be practical to meet all the nutrient needs of
some crops with animal waste. Supplemental applications of commercial
fertilizer may be required during the growing season in order to meet all crop
nutrient needs. It is assumed that for certain row crops only a fraction of the
total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using animal waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on each
field on the Department of Water Quality waste Application Record Form.
Nitrogen rates are based on several factors; Soil type, Crop type, Realistic
Yield Expectation (R.Y.E.) Refer to the soil type chart attached to the back of
your WUP plan for the correct nitrogen application rate.
The following legend explains the soil codes, which represent the specific soil
types that are found in the fields, which are available for animal waste
application:
R

SOIL
CODE
SOIL
TYPE
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
AcD
Ashe-Cleveland 8-25%
Stony
AcE
Ashe-Cleveland 25-60%
Stony
Ben
Bethlehem gravelly 2-8%-
BeC
Bethlehem gravelly 8-15$
_
BrC
jBethlehem-Urban 2-15%
BsC2
Braddock Hayesville 6-15
Eroded
BsD2
I Braddock/Hayesville 15-25%
Eroded
BuA
I Buncombe loamy sand 0-3%-
occasionally flooded
CeB2
I Cecil sandy clay loam 2-8%
Eroded
CfB
Cecil -Urban complex 2-8%
ChA
Chewacla loam 0-2%
Frequently flooded
CnF
I Cleveland -Rock outcrop 8-90%I
CsD
I Cowee-Saluda 8-25%
Stony
CsE
I Cowee-Saluda 25--60%
I Stony
DaB2
Davidson clay loam 2-8%
F Eroded
DaC2
jDavidson cl 8-15%
I Eroded
DoB I
Dogue sandy loam 2-6%
Rarely flooded
ECD
Evard-Cowee 8-25%
Stony
EcE
Evard-Cowee 25-60%
_ _
j Stony
H b C
Hibriten very cobbly sandy loam 8-15
HbE
jHibriten vcsl 15-60%
1
MaB2
Masada sandy clay loam 2-8%,
I Eroded
MaC2
Masada scl 8-15%
I Eroded
( Continued on next page )
( Continued from previous page )
SOIL I SOIL I COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
01

., _""-x _
iF E€�
CODE TYPE
tie; w •, e -
AN
4­•i_r
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
PaD
Pacolet sandy loam 15-25%
PcB2
Pacolet sandy clay loam 2-8WI
Eroded
PcC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam 8-15
Eroded
PuC
Pacolet-Urban complex 2-15%
Eroded
RnC
Rion sandy loam 8-15%
RnD
Rion sandy loam 15-25%
RnE
Rion sandy loam 25-45%
RwB
Rion -Wedowee complex 2-8
RxA
Riverview fine sandy loam 0-2%
Frequently Flooded
StB
State sandy loam 2-6%
TfB
Tate -French complex 2-10%
UdC
Udorthents-Urban complex 0-15%
W
Water
WeA
Wehadkee loam 0-2%
Frequently Flooded
Table 1: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be application
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied2 window (3)
1650
1
PcC2
CS
18 tons/acre
13.00
198
2,574 march -June
1659
1
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
3.22
101
325 Sept. -may
1
"
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
"
135
435 "
2
CeB2
�Cs/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
16.00
124
1,984 "
10

EaiE!E � ' �E 3 1','� 1 {a p�.1• f uS1��; �� �i�.l E E j I��SJk.. E � V � '.. °'F i4 � iy{A€�
ill€�
i?.. n
E IF s !! E 9 �k iEIL;i C !NSF 5'
,., is'. i a' . sii',a atEl i. _
2
CS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
165
2,640
2
org-sedan/hay
5.0 tons/acre
250
4,000 may-sept.
2
66ryegrass
3 ton/acre
"
150
2,400
3
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
5.00
101
505 sept-may
3
"
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/care
"
135
675 "
4
DoB
PCS/fescue
5.7 tons/acre
13.15
214
27814 44
4
"
CS/fescue
5.7 tons/acre
"
285
3,848 "
5
CeB2
CS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
11.00
124
1,364 "
5
46CS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
it165
1,815 "
6
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
15.60
101
1,576 "
6
44CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
41216
2,025 "
6
"
Sorg-sudan/hay
4.0 tons/acre
"
200
3,120 may-sept.
6
"
ryegrass
3 ton/acre
"
150
2,340 "
6a
"
CS
18 tons/acre
5.00
198
1,080 march-june
2112
2
CeB2
HCS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
7.09
165
1,170 sept.-may
2a
PcC2
CS
18 tons/acre
5.04
216
1,089 march-june
2a
"
soybeans
25 bush/acre
"
50
252 april-july
2a
"
sorghum
2 tons/acre
"
100
504 may-july
3
ChA
CS
22 tons/acre
2.97
264
784 march-june
3
"
soybeans
30 bush/acre
"
60
178 april-july
3
C6sorghum
2 tons/acre
66100
297 may-july
4
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
3.86
101
390 Sept. -may
5
ChA
CS/fescue
5.4 tons/acre
6.00
270
1,620 "
6
i
ChA
CS/fescue
5.4 tons/acre
13.75
270
3,713
TOTALS THIS TABLE
191.891
15,092 / 30,425 (4 )
*'Important Footnotes on next page *
* Table 1 Footnotes *
1• The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
11

PLAN
2. This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. Seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
4. These figures represent the high and low end of the scale. The amount of
Nitrogen required will depend on the crop being grown and the method of
harvest.
5. SOYBEANS and other LEGUMES: Residual Nitrogen must be accounted for in the
succeeding crops. This will amount to 15 lbs. on low yielding soils and 30
lbs. on higher yielding soils. This change must be noted on your waste
application forms.
Table la: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
Soil
Realistic
Lbs . N
Lbs . N
waste
Tract Field
Type
Crop
Anticipated
Acresl
Required
to be
application
No. No.
Code
Code
Yield
Useable
Per Ac.
Applied2
window 3
1650
1
PeC2
�SG/barleyl2
ton I acre
13.00
110
1,430
sept-feb
1659
6a
PcC2
SGlbarley
2 ton /acre
5.00
110
550
46
12

F j�M�d N L
2112 2a PcC2 SG/barley 2 ton / acre
3 ChA HSG/barley 2 ton / acre
TOTALS THIS TABLE : 1 26.011 1 2,862
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. Seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
13

! sa'.."' I"i 1'M 77M 1 T"` -
�s�,�a7� ILIZ,A 1!,,0"-,,N,-: PLAN
Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached) (Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Recommended
Soil Lbs. N Lba. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be application
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied2 window
1591
1
CeB2
CS
20 ton / acre
3.60
240
780 march-june
1
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
«
50
180 april-july
2
"
CS
20 ton / acre
5.02
240
1,205 march-june
2
"
soybeans
25 bu 1 acre
"
50
251 aprii-june
1590
1
PcC2
CS
18 ton I acre
4.98
216
1,076 march-june
1
"
soybeans
25 ton / acre
"
5 0
249 april-june
1575
1
ChA
CS
22 ton / acre
12.73
240
3,055 march-june
2
PcC2
CS
18 ton / acre
496
216
1,071 march-june
2
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
248 aprii-june
3
ChA
CS
22 ton / acre
1.92
240
461 march-june
4
GG
CS
22 ton / acre
8.00
240
1,920 march-june
5
PcC2
CS
18 ton 1 acre
4.66
216
1,007 march-june
1576
1
RxA
CS
22 ton / acre
7.12
264
1,880 march-june
1589
1
PcC2
CS
18 ton 1 acre
2.32
216
501 march-june
1
"
soybeans
25 bu 1 acre
"
50
116 aprii-june
2
CG
CS
18 ton I acre
4.46
216
963 march-june
2
66
soybeans
25 bu / acre
66
50
223 aprii-june
1336
2
StB
CS
24 ton 1 acre
4.24
288
1,221 march-june
1956
1
PcC2
CS
18 ton I acre
7.35
216
1,588 march-june
1
. "
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
368 april-june
1876
1
CeB2
CS
20 ton / acre
1.36
240
326 march-june
1
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
68 aprii-june
2
CeB2
CSH/fescu
3.3 ton / acre
0.90
165
149 sept-june
3
"
"
"
1.66
"
274 4G
5
PcC2
"
"
4.86
46802
46
6
CeB2
CS
20 ton / acre
2.80
240
672 march-june
6
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
66
50
140 april-june
7
"
CS
20 ton 1 acre
1.00
240
240 march-june
7
soybeans
25 bu / acre
ff
50
50 april-june
8
ii
CS
20 ton / acre
4.36
240
1,046 march-june
8
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
66
50
218 aprii-june
9
CS
20 ton / acre
3.28
240
787 march-june
9
soybeans
25 bu 1 acre 1
66
50
164 aprii-june
TOTALS THIS TABLE :
91.58
�
13, 044 / 21,024 (4)
(TABLE 2 CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE.)
14

Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR
LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached) (Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Reconmended
Soil Lbs. N Lbs. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acres(1) Required to be application
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied(2) window(3)
1537
1
PcC2 CS
18 ton / acre
14.76
216
3,188 march-june
1324
1
CS
18 ton / acre
10.98
216
2,372 march -June
1
" soybeans
25 bu / acre
50
549 april-june
1325
1
46 CSG/fescue
3.3 ton / acr
16.00
124
1,984 sept-june
1
" 1C fescue
ICSG/fescue
"
"
165
2,640 66
2
PaD
3.6 ton / acre
18.65
135
2,518 46
2
" 1ICSH/fescue
180
3,357
3
RxA SG/fescue
5.4 ton / acr
14.16
203
2,875 "
3
" ICSH/fescue
"
270
3,823 "
4
PaD ICSG/fescue
3.6 ton acre
3.55
135
479 "
4
" SH/fescue
"
"
180
639 "
5
PcC2 SG/fescue
2.7 ton / acr
5.93
101
599 "
5
" ICSH/fescue
"
"
135
801 "
6
" ICSG/fescue
662.71
101
274 64
6
" ICSH/fescue
"
"
135
366 "
1350
2
RxA CS
22 ton / acre
13.00
264
3,432 march-june
21
4
PcC2 CS
18 ton / acre
5.69
216
1,229 "
1670
1
RxA CS
22 ton / acre
8.80
264
2,323 "
1747
3
CeB2 CSG/fescue
3.3 ton / acre
4.40
124
546 sept-june
3
" ICSH/fescue
66"
165
726 64
4
PcC2 IICSG/fescue
2.7 ton / acre
8.75
101
884 "
4
rrICSH/fescue
"
44
135
1,181 "
1387
1
CeB2 CS
20 ton / acre
7.30
240
1,752 march -June
1939
1
PcC2 CS
18 ton / acre
6.00
216
1,296 46
TOTALS THIS TABLE
140.68
23,928 / 29,125
TOTALS BOTH TABLES
232.26
36,972 / 50,149
(4)
*** IMPORTANT FOOTNOTES ON NEXT PAGE ***
15

TABLE 2 FOOTNOTES
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
Z• Total amount of N required in a specific field for a specific crop. If
nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they
must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. Seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
4. These figures represent the high and low end of the scale. The amount of
Nitrogen required will depend on the crop being grown and the method of
harvest.
5. SOYBEANS and other LEGUMES: Residual Nitrogen must be accounted for in the
succeeding crops. This will amount to 15 lbs. on low yielding soils and 30
lbs. on higher yielding soils. This change must be noted on your waste
application forms.
16

Table 2a: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR
LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Recommended
Soil Lbs. N Lbs. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acres(1) Required to be application
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied(2) window(3)
1591
1
CeB2
SG/barley
2 ton / acre
3.60
110
396 sept-feb
2
"
"
"
5.02
"
552 `L
1590
1
PcC2
"
"
4.98
"
548 "
1575
1
ChA
"
"
12.73
"
1,400 "
2
PcC2
"
4.96
546 "
3
ChA
64"
1.92
"
211 "
4
"
"
"
8.00
66
880 44
5
PcC2
"
"
4.66
"
513 "
1576
1
RxA
"
"
7.12
783 66
1589
1
PcC2
"
"
2.32
"
255 "
2
"
"
"
4.46
&&491
cc
1336
2
StB
"
"
4.24
"
466 "
1956
1
PcC2
"66
7.35
rr809
46
1876
1
CeB2
"
"
1.36
66150
"
6
"
"
"
2.80
"
308 "
7
"
"
1.00
"
110 "
8
"
"
66
4.36
"
480 66
9
"
"
"
3.28
"
361 "
1537
1
PcC2
"
"
14.76
"
1,624 "
1324
l
"
44
"
10.98
"
1,208 "
1350
2
RxA
"
"
13.00
66
1,430
1321
4
PcC2
"
"
5.69
"
626
1670
1
RxA
66
"
8.80
f1f,968
"
1387
1
CeB2
"
cc
7.30
"
803
1939
1
PcC2
"
66
6.00
"
660 "
TOTALS THIS TABLE
150.69
16, 578
17

1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
2. Total amount of N required in a specific field for a specific crop. if
nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they
must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. Seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
18

Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen
to be applied using animal waste for all fields which are available for waste
application.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
TOTAL CROP
RECOMMENDED
SUPPLEMENTAL
ACRES
NITROGEN
LBS. N TO
OR RESIDUAL
USEABLE
REQUIREMENT
BE APPLIED
LBS. OF N
IN POUNDS
USING WASTE
REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1
191.89
30,425
3,138
27,287
FROM TABLE 1A
26.01
2,862
215
2,647
FROM TABLE 2
232.26
50,149
10,264
39,885
FROM TABLE 2A
150.69
16,578
6,484
10,094
TOTAL ALL TABLES
600.85
100,014
20,101
79,913
This summary indicates that only about _2 0 percent of the total annual
nitrogen requirements can be provided for the crops, as listed for the fields
available using animal waste produced on this livestock operation.
19

�r9 SS,
� 4 1
�• fss_ he9 , ,a �.wr¢vt�ts�€ ., . ��,,,� e� es r ! xt. t.-'7 w�x< :a +sx �".:.€.� .. rr..r� -�P3 E -�-
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This is a family owned and operated farm. They milk 175 hd. of Jersey
cows. They have the capacity to milk 250 hd. with waste storage for 90 days.
Their waste handling systems consist of a drystack for solids and a waste
storage pond for liquids. All lot run-off and silage leachate are captured and
stored in the waste storage pond. Plans are currently underway to roof a large
portion of the open lot. This will increase storage in the waste storage pond
from 90 days to 120 days or greater. The liquid waste is irrigated with a solid
set gun, irrigation system on fields 2, 6, & 6a of tract 41659. This waste
should test very low in nitrogen. It is recommended that the owner/operator of
the farm get in the habit of only allowing the waste storage pond to get half
full before irrigation is initiated. Never allow runoff to reach the waters of
the state. In no instances, except during a 24 hour 25 year storm, should the
waste storage pond reach a level that is higher than 181, below the top of the
dam. The drystack also has storage for 90 days. The Chapmans own or lease more
than enough cropland to apply the PAN produced on their farm.
On a personal note, The Chapmans are very conscience of the environment and
have spent a lot of time and money on BMP's to improve water quality on their
farm and the land they rent.
Also, This WUP is calculated using the maximum design capacity. (250hd)
The actual amount of waste generated is somewhat lower at this time. (175hd)
ME

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Bill Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville NC 28581
Farm Number: 02 - 13
Dear Bill Chapman:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
rr.c: DEPT. t
March 15, 2000 rkNVIRONMENT, HEAL'I-1,%
tip NATURAL RESOURCE4
MAR " 2,40
itllsio'l of wivitie'liiflllllL IfiflflA6RW; c•
onnRLSVILLE OF.6111"1AL OFM
You are hereby notified that Chapman Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
I617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension 363 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
ZsSmce J
fvens
CC" Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION OF
WASTE.
(ALL MAPS ARE INCLUDED AT THE END OF THIS WUP.)
21

Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field No.
Tract No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate
(in./hr.)
Application
Amount
(inches)
Application
Time
(hours)
2
1659
1 CeB2
1cool season grazing (fescue)
I 0.37
I .74
2
"
"
I
cool season hay (fescue)
64
I u
Isorghumisudangrass (chop)I
"
"
"
6
1 PcC2
cool season grazing (fescue)
I " I
"1
"
coal season hay (fescue)
"
"
"
I "
Isorghundsudangrass (chop)
"
I "
"
6a
"
"
corn silage
1"1
"
"
" I
"
barley (green chop)
I
"
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR
DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Depending on waste samples taken, these values may need to be adjusted to more accurately reflect nutrient values of waste
samples. Samples should be taken within 60 days of waste application, preferably before.
22

FIELD OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS
NOTE TO FIELD OFFICE PERSONNEL PREPARING THIS PLAN:
The following items and the Required Specifications must be addressed in the Waste
Utilization Plan in order for the plan to meet the minimum requirements of the .0200
rules and NRCS standards. Ail of these concerns may not be applicable for a given
operation. Additional concerns may have to be addressed at certain operations. These
items express the minimum requirements. Where necessary, the planner/designer is to
elaborate on these concerns or add others as applicable. Comments within these items
that are in parenthesis, are underlined, and are bold typed are for Field Office reference
only and are not to be included in the landowner's copy of the plan. This note is also
provided only for Field Office reference and is not to be included in the landowner's copy
of the plan.
1. The waste utilization plan will include all animal waste generated on the farm.
2. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must be maintained below the
maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event
in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
23

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste, which reaches surface water, is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. _ (The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has a notarized long term agreement for use of adequate land on
which to properly apply „the „waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a
notarized. agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the -facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land).
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield
tables at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If a RMS or ACS is used the
soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to
"Buffers" required by DWQ. See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard
392 - Ri arian Forest Buffer.
Injecting the waste or disking after waste application can reduce odors. Waste should
not be applied when the wind is blowing or any other condition exists which may
cause a danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation -tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment rile for uidance.
24

3a y ����� �lti I(F_ N: PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method, which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine, poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent of
the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a concern where diluted, low
nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to occur.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple application at lower
rates should be used. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production &
reduce the potential for pollution, the waste shall not be applied more than 30 days
prior to planting of the crop on bare soil, or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a
lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an
irrigation ditch or canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities sited
on or after October 1, 1995,) shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water
(See Standard 393 - Filter Stripsand Standard 392 - Ri arian Forest Brr er
25

—I
I
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells,
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided a "technical specialist" has approved them as a land application
site. Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways, which discharge
directly into watercourses. If animal waste is to be applied on other grassed
waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates and in a manner that causes no
runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon/holding pond embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special
vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species,
etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon/holding pond areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon/holding pond berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved closure plan" which will
eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
26

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct
human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and
alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. Soil
pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records
shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste
shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations. North
Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that dead animals be disposed of within 24
hours in a manner approved by the state veterinarian.
27

N PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:_CRAPMAN FARMS ( BILL CHAPMAN ?
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation
or other equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in
this Waste Utilization Alan. The equipment must be available at
the appropriate time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon,
holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage structure in a 25
year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will
be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate
times and at rates that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: BILL CHAPMAN
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) STEVE FERGUSON
Affiliation: ALEXANDER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Address (Agency): 255 LILEDOUN ROAD
TAYLORSVILLE, N.C. 28681
Signature: pr� Date: JQ

State of North Carolina
Department of EnvironmeW;�� r; •
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 2.1
James B. Hunt, Jr., GoveNT &�
Bill Holman, Secretaryft"i Oval
NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 14, 2000
Bill Chapman
Chapman Farms
280 Chapman Farm Lane
Taylorsville NC 28581
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWCO20013
Chapman Farms
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Alexander County
Dear Bill Chapman:
In accordance with your application received on April 12, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Bill Chapman, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Chapman Farms Farm, located in Alexander County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 250 Dairy and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Maff Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWCO20013
Chapman Farms f yj
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A namelownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at (9I9) 733-5083 ext. 502.
ZSincere
Kerr T. Stevens
CC' (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
AlexanderCounty Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Qtiality Section
Alexander County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina � .
Department of Environment and Natural Resources iva�TaZALTA
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form JUL 2 t 2000
1JENil;rt tt:��u�ri RE0i0�1,11 pFFfE>_k (THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Opera lkc r�rrsar
W'LEUtollu oaf
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Chapman Farms______
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Bill Chapman
1.3 Mailing address: 280 Chapman -Farm Lane _
City, State: Taylorsville NC �_ Zip: 28581
Telephone Number (include area code): 828 632-3129
1.4 County where facility is located: Alexander
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): INTERSECTION OF NC 90/64 West AND Three Forks
Church Rd,LSR 1313) . Take right and the farm is 2 miles on the right.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/68
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 02 (county number); 13 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy
250- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; 71 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maxi um number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
• Wean to Feeder • Layer • Dairy
• Feeder to Finish • Non -Layer • Beef
• Farrow to Wean (# sow) • Turkey
• Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
• Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No, of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 02 - 13

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 458.95 : Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): Ito
2.4 Number of lagoons/ torage ponds circle which is applicable): I
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? a a
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? _ q 1
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The;^AN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.39 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
/
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 2 of 4 02 -13

Facility Number: 02 - 13
Facility Name: Chapman Farms
4. A
CERTIFICATION:
I, (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and if accurate and complete to a best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me. as iacomvleV?
Signature
Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
. FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 3 of 4 02 -13

Producer: Bill Chapman Chapman Farms
Location: Three Forks Church Rd. ( SR 1313 )
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Jersey Dairy
Number of Animals: 250 milking cows
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure(s): Waste Storage Pond & Drystack
Application Nethod(s): Irrigation & Broadcast Land Application
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
You must have the animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content
as close to the time of application as practical and at least within
60 days of the date of application before each application cycle.
Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must be
analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced
for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(S) years.
2

A
0
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Lime must be
applied to application fields as recommended by soil test to
maintain the plant uptake of nutrients:
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, (see Required Specification No. 4) waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils,- when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation
of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
.0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste
should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and
to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be
applied to a growing crop. Otherwise apply waste no
earlier than 30 days prior to planting a crop or prior to
forages breaking dormancy. Injecting or otherwise
incorporating the waste below the soil surface will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where
waste is applied shall be monitored and alternative
application fields shall be used when these metals approach
excess levels.
3

This plan is based on waste application by (Irrigation/Broadcast) for
this is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. if
you choose to alter the method(s) of application in the future, you
need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various waste
application methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste are based on
typical nutrient content for Dairy systems in North Carolina. Actual
acreage requirements shall be based on waste analysis reports from
storage structures in your waste management system. Attached you will
find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and
transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your DRYSTACR & WASTE HOLDING POND are designed for 90 days of
temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 3 mo. If your facility is unroofed, in no
instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure be
higher than the maximum storage marker except in the event of a 25
year, 24 hour storm.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Only persons who hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of
an animal waste management system shall operate the waste management
system, which is covered by this waste utilization plan. The North
Carolina Water Quality Commission will provide training and
certification of operators.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the
Water Quality Commission.
4

AMOUNT OF SOLID WASTE PRODUCED/YEAR
250 milk cows X 17tons of waste/animal/year = 4,250_tons\waste/year
= 1,020,000 gallons/waste/year
AMOUNT OF LIQUID WASTE PRODUCED/YEAR FROM MILK ROOM AND LOT RUNOFF.
250 milk cows X 5 gallons/cow/day X 365 days-456,250 gallons
LOT RUNOFF IS APPROXIMATELY 274,189 allons/near
TOTAL ANIMAL WASTE AND WASTE WATER VOLUME GENERATED IN ONE YEAR IS
APPROXIMATELY 4,250 tons solid waste and 730,439 aallons or 26.89 acre/inches
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED/YEAR FROM LIQUID WASTE
730,439 gallons of waste X 2.5 lbs.PAN/1000 gallons/waste
= 1,826 lbs_. PAN/year
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PAN) PRODUCED/YEAR FROM SOLID WASTE.
4.250 Tons of waste X 4.3 lbs. PAN/year
= 18,275 lbs. PAN/year
r

Total animal waste and waste water volume generated in one year is
approximately 4,250 tons and
gallons or 26.89 acre -inches.
1,82E lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
+ 18,275 lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
= 20,101 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
values used above are based on analysis of waste from similar
livestock operations in North Carolina (source: USDA-NRCS FOTG
Practice Standard 633-Waste Utilization). Actual nutrient
content of the waste from this system may vary from these
values. Waste analysis should be made of the actual waste as
soon as possible after significant waste accumulates in the
storage structure(s).
The applicator is cautioned that P and I{ may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers In same parts of North
Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addressea
all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.

it
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the infiltration rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is
limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water
droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the
available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor
should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that
an irrigation system is installed, too properly irrigate the acres shown in
tables 1 through 3. Failureto-Mlv the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this Alan invalid.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying forage plants under stress
condition. Nitrate poisoning may occur in livestock. Sampling forages or hays
for nitrate levels is recommended.
7

0
0 EMU EsE ZI4 bFTM
I C] N AN
.=.,,.s-
WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are available
for waste application. It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to
apply waste to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual nitrogen
(N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the potential productivity of
the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the Nitrogen that can
be reasonably applied to the crop and used by the crop in a timely manner using
animal waste alone. it will not be practical to meet all the nutrient needs of
some crops with animal waste. Supplemental applications of commercial
fertilizer may be required during the growing season in order to meet all crop
nutrient needs. It is assumed that for certain row crops only a fraction of the
total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using animal waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on each
field on the Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record Form.
Nitrogen rates are based on several factors; Soil type, Crop type, Realistic
Yield Expectation (R.Y.E.) Refer to the soil type chart attached to the back of
your WUP plan for the correct nitrogen application rate.
A

�u� #��� �� ���� 1111�►► � T E �r: lJ T I I � �T I�C) N 3 a �� �� 1 � � �"
irl
t
�,
�f sr �t
Via= � ���r� 6 z , r
i5.L
The following legend explains the soil codes, which represent the specific soil
types that are found in the fields, which are available for animal waste
application:
SOIL
CODE
SOIL
TYPE
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
AcD
Ashe-Cleveland 8-25%
Stony
AcE
Ashe-Cleveland 25-60%
Stony
BeB
Bethlehem gravelly 2-8%
BeC
Bethlehem gravelly 8-15%
BrC
Bethlehem -Urban 2-15%
BsC2
Braddock/Hayesville 6-15
Eroded
BsD2
Braddock/Hayesville 1.5-25%
Eroded
BuA
Buncombe loamy sand 0-3%
Occasionally flooded
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam 2-8%
Eroded
CfB
Cecil -Urban complex 2-8%
ChA
Chewacla loam 0-2%
Frequently flooded
CnF
Cleveland -Rock Outcrop 8-90%
CsD
Cowee-Saluda 8-25%
Stony
CsE
Cowee-Saluda 25-60%
Stony
DaB2
Davidson clay loam 2-8%
Eroded
DaC2
Davidson cl 8-1.5%
Eroded
DoB
Dogue sandy loam 2-6%
Rarely flooded
EcD
Evard-Cowee 8-25%
Stony
ECE
Evard-Cowee 25-60%
Stony
HbC
Hibriten very cobbly sandy loam 8-15
HbE
Hibriten vcsl 15-60%
MaB2
Masada sandy clay loam 2-8%,
Eroded
MaC2
Masada scl 8-15%
Eroded
( Continued on next page )
�i

( Continued from previous page )
SOIL
CODE
SOIL
TYPE
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
PaD
Pacolet sandy loam 15-25%
PcB2
Pacolet sandy clay loam 2-8%
Eroded
PcC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam 8-15
Eroded
PuC
PaCOlet-Urban complex 2-15%
Eroded
RnC
Rion sandy loam 8-15%
RnD
Rion sandy loam 15-25%
RnE
Rion sandy loam 25-45%
RwB
Rion -Wedowee complex 2-8%
RxA
Riverview fine sandy loam 0-2%
Frequently Flooded
StB
State sandy loam 2--6%
TfB
Tate -French complex 2-10%
UdC
Udorthents-Urban complex 0-15%
W
water
WeA
Wehadkee loam 0-2%
Frequently Flooded
r
10

R
CJ
Table 1: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be application
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. AAplied2 window (3)
1659
1
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
3.22
101
325
Sept. -may
1
it
HCS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
44
135
435
46
2
CeB2
CS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
16.00
124
1,984
"
2
"
CS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
"
165
2,640
"
2
"
org.suda"ay
5.0 tons/acre
"
250
4,000
3
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
5.00
101
505
"
3
"
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/care
"
135
675
"
4
DoB
CS/fescue
5.7 tonstacre
13.15
214
2,814
44
4
"
CS/fescue
5.7 tons/acre
"
285
3,848
"
5
CeB2
CS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
11.00
124
1,364
"
5
66
HCS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
641165
1,815
66
6
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
15.60
101
1,576
96
6
"
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
"
216
2,025
"
6
14N-suaaWhay
4.0 tons/acre
66200
3,120
6a
44CS
18 tons/acre
5.00
198
1,080
march June
2112
2
CeB2
HCS/fescue
3.3 tons/acre
7.09
165
1,170
sept.-may
2a
PcC2
CS
18 tons/acre
5.04
216
1,089
march June
2a
"
soybeans
25 bush/acre
6450
252
april July
2a
46sorghum
2 tons/acre
66100
504
may July
3
ChA
CS
22 tons/acre
2.97
264
784
march June
3
"
soybeans
30 bush/acre
"
60
178
april-July
3
66sorghum
2 tons/acre
"
100
297
may-july
4
PcC2
CS/fescue
2.7 tons/acre
3.86
101
390
sept.-may
5
ChA
CS/fescue
5.4 tons/acre
6.00
270
1,620
46
6
ChA
CS/fescue
5.4 tonstacre
13.75
270
3,713
44
TOTALS THIS TABLE :
147.29
15,092 / 23,111 (4)
* Important Footnotes on next page *
11

0 0
M
* Table 1 Footnotes *
1• The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
2. This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
4. These figures represent the high and low end of the scale. The amount of
Nitrogen required will depend on the crop being grown and the method of
harvest.
12

0
Table la: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
soil Realistic Lbs . N Lbs . N waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be application
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Annlied2 window 3
1659
6a
PcC2
SG/barley
2 ton / acre
5.00
110
550
Sept.-feb.
2112
2a
PcC2
G/barley
2 ton / acre
5.04
110
555
"
3
ChA
SG/barley
2 ton / acre
2.97
110
327
"
TOTALS THIS TABLE
13.011
1 1,432
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources such as
commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be
based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. Seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
13

0 0
Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landomaer must be attached) (Required only if operator does not own
adequate land lose Required Specification 21)
Reconmended
Soil Lbs. N Lbs. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be application
NO. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Amlied2 window
1591
1
CeB2
CS
20 ton / acre
3.60
240
780
march -June
1
66soybeans
25 bu / acre
6650
180
april-july
2
44CS
20 ton / acre
5.02
240
1,205
march June
2
44soybeans
25 bu / acre
6450
251
april June
1590
1
PcC2
CS
18 ton / acre
4.98
216
1,076
march June
1
"
soybeans
25 ton / acre
94Jr
0
249
april-june
1575
1
ChA
CS
22 ton / acre
12.73
240
3,055
march June
2
PcC2
CS
18 ton / acre
4.96
216
13,071
march June
2
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
248
april June
3
ChA
CS
22 ton / acre
1.92
240
461
march-june
4
66
CS
22 ton / acre
8.00
240
1,920
march June
5
PcC2
CS
18 ton / acre
4.66
216
1,007
march June
1576
1
RxA
CS
22 ton / acre
7.12
264
1,880
march-june
1589
1
PcC2
CS
18 ton / acre
2.32
216
501
march-june
1
44
soybeans
25 bu / acre
44
50
116
april-june
2
69CS
18 ton / acre
4.46
216
963
march June
2
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
6650
223
april June
1336
2
StB
CS
24 ton / acre
4.24
288
1,221
march-june
1956
1
PcC2
CS
18 ton / acre
7.35
216
1,588
march June
1
41soybeans
25 bu 1 acre
rc
50
368
april June
1876
1
CeB2
CS
20 ton / acre
1.36
240
326
march June
1
66
soybeans
25 bu / acre
66
SO
68
april-june
2
CeB2
SH/fescu
3.3 ton / acr
0.90
165
149
sept-june
3
1.66
"
274
46
5
PcC2
"
"
4.86
"
802
"
6
CeB2
CS
20 ton / acre
2.80
240
672
march June
6
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
140
april-june
7
46CS
20 ton / acre
1.00
240
240
march June
7
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
50
april-june
8
66CS
20 ton / acre
4.36
240
1,046
march June
8
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
218
april June
9
66CS
20 ton / acre
3.28
240
787
march -June
9
1
soybeans
1 25 bu 1 acre
50
164
aril -June
TOTALS THIS TABLE
91.58
13,044 / 21,024 (4 )
(TABLE 2 CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE.)
14

E
Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG
TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner mnat be attached) (Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [aee Required Specification 21)
Recon mmended
soil Lbs. N Lbs. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acres(1) Required to be application
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied(2) window(3)
1537
1
PcC2
CS
18 ton / acre
14.76
216
3,188
march-june
1324
1
44
CS
18 ton / acre
10.98
216
2,372
march June
1
"
soybeans
25 bu / acre
"
50
549
april June
1325
1
44
CSG/fescue
3.3 ton / am
16.00
124
1,984
sept-june
1
44
CSEYfescue
44
66
165
2,640
66
2
PaD
SG/fescue
3.6 ton / acr
18.65
135
2,518
"
2
46
CSH/fescue
66
66
180
3,357
44
3
RxA
SG/fescue
5.4 ton / am
14.16
203
2,875
"
3
46
CSEUfescue
"
64
270
3,823
66
4
PaD
SG/fescue
3.6 ton acre
3.55
135
479
66
4
64
CSEUfescue
44
66
180
639
44
5
PcC2
SSG/f escue
2.7 ton / acr
5.93
101
599
"
5
"
SE fescue
"
"
135
801
"
6
66
CSG/fescue
64
2.71
101
274
66
6
"
SE/fescue
46
6d135
366
41
1350
2
RxA
CS
22 ton / acre
13.00
264
3,432
march-june
21
4
PcC2
CS
18 ton I acre
5.69
216
1,229
64
1670
1
RxA
CS
22 ton / acre
8.80
264
2,323
44
1747
3
CeB2
SG/fescue
3.3 ton / acre
4.40
124
546
Sept-june
3
if
CSIMescue
66
64
165
726
66
4
PcC2
SG/fescue
2.7 ton / acre
8.75
101
884
66
4
"
SH/fescue
"
"
135
1,181
"
1387
1
CeB2
CS
20 ton / acre
7.30
240
1,752
march June
1939
1 1
1 PcC2
I CS
1 18 ton / acre
6.00
1 216
1 1.296
TOTALS
THIS
TABLE :
140.68
23,928
/ 29,125
TOTALS
BOTH
TABLES
232.26
36,972 /
50,149 (4)
*** IMPORTANT FOOTNOTES ON NEXT PAGE ***
15

• 0
TABLE 2 FOOTNOTES
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential. areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
a• Total amount of N required in a specific field for a specific crop. If
nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they
must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. Seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
4. These figures represent the high and low end of the scale. The amount of
Nitrogen required will depend on the crop being grown and the method of
harvest.

0
Table 2a: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR
LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land (see Required Specification 1])
Recommended
Soil Lbs. N Lbs. N to waste
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acres(1) Required to be application
NO. No. cede Coda Yield Useable Par Ac. Annlied(2) window(3)
1591
1
CeB2
SG/barley
2 ton / acre
3.60
110
396
Sept-feb
2
"
"
it
5.02
"
552
"
1590
1
PcC2
"
"
4.98
"
548
"
1575
1
ChA
it
12.73
661,400
it
2
PcC2
"
"
4.96
"
546
"
3
ChA
it
"
1.92
it211
"
4
it
"
"
8.00
it
880
`f
5
PX2
"
"
4.66
"
513
"
1576
1
RxA
44
44
7.12
66783
66
1589
1
PcC2
"
it
2.32
"
255
"
2
64
64
it
4.46
46491
it
1336
2
StB
"
"
4.24
"
466
"
1956
1
PcC2
"
"
7.35
"
809
.69
1876
1
CeB2
"
it
1.36
"
150
"
6
"
"
"
2.80
it
308
`f
7
"
"
"
1.00
"
110
"
8
"
"
it
4.36
"
480
it
9
"
"
"
3.28
"
361
"
1537
1
PcC2
"
"
14.76
"
1,624
"
1324
1
"
"
"
10.98
"
1,208
"
1350
2
RxA
64
"
13.00
661,430
"
1321
4
PcC2
"
"
5.69
"
626
"
1670
1
RxA
"
"
8.80
"
968
"
1387
1
CeB2
"
"
7.30
"
803
"
1939
1
PcC2
"
"
6.00
"
660
"
TOTALS THIS TABLE
150.69
16,578
*** IMPORTANT FOOTNOTES ON NEXT PAGE ***
17

0 0
,A
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the
required buffer areas, which border streams, or residential areas. Actual
total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
2. Total amount of N required in a specific field for a specific crop. If
nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they
must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
3. This is a suggested application window. Seasonal grasses should be actively
growing when waste is applied. Depending on weather patterns application
windows may change.
18

r
j ., - � i C � <- :=•fir: �' -
r � e
zh
';R i ;p ;€c ier„
r
3r 6
0
Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen
to be applied using animal waste for all fields which are available for waste
application.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
TOTAL CROP
RECOMMENDED
SUPPLEMENTAL
ACRES
NITROGEN
LBS. N TO
OR RESIDUAL
USEABLE
REQUIREMENT
BE APPLIED
LBS. OF N
IN POUNDS
USING WASTE
REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1
147.29
23,111
3,138
19,973
FROM TABLE 1A
13.01
1,432
215
1,217
FROM TABLE 2
232.26
50,149
10,264
39,885
FROM TABLE 2A
150.69
16,578
6,484
10,094
TOTAL ALL TABLES
458.95
91,270
*20,101
71,169-
This summary indicates that only about -2 2 _ percent of the total annual
nitrogen requirements can be provided for the crops, as listed for the fields
available using animal waste produced on this livestock operation.
*This amount assumes 100% confinement. During dry weather only 35% confinement
will be required.
19

-77
TE',.UTILIZATION, PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This is a family owned and operated farm. They milk 175 hd. of Jersey
cows. They have the capacity to milk 250 hd. with waste storage for 90 days.
Their waste handling systems consist of a drystack for solids and a waste
storage pond for liquids. All lot run-off and silage leachate are captured and
stored in the waste storage pond. Plans are currently underway to roof a large
portion of the open lot. This will increase storage in the waste storage pond
from 90 days to 120 days or greater. The liquid waste is irrigated with a solid
set gun, irrigation system on fields 2, 6, & 6a of tract #1659. This waste
should test very low in nitrogen. It is recommended that the owner/operator of
the farm get in the habit of only allowing the waste storage pond to get half
full before irrigation is initiated. Never allow runoff to reach the waters of
the state. in no instances, except during a 24 hour 25 year storm, should the
waste storage pond reach a level that is higher than 18" below the top of the
dam. The drystack also has storage for 90 days. The Chapmans own or lease more
than enough cropland to apply the PAN produced on their farm.
On a personal note, The Chapmans are very conscience of the environment and
have spent a lot of time and money on BMP's to improve water quality on their
farm and the land they rent.
*Also, This WUP is calculated using the maximum design capacity. (250hd)
The actual amount of waste generated is somewhat lower at this time. (1.75hd)
**This WUP assumes 100 % confinement. Actual confinement under dry weather
conditions will normally be around 33 This factor will increase solid waste
storage another 30-45 days. The pasture used for the herd when not on the lot
contains 50 + acres of fescue. This acreage is divided into 6-8 separate lots
and rotational grazing is practiced. Sudex and other summer annuals are drills
into most of this acreage to increase forage production and nutrient uptake.
This pasture can also be used for hay during a excellent growing season.
0
20

0
0
MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION OF
WASTE.
(ALL MAPS ARE INCLUDED AT THE END OF THIS WUP.)
21

Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field No.
Tract No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate
(inJhr.)
Application
Amount
(inches)
Application
Time
(hours)
2
1659
CeB2
cool season grazing (fescue)
0.37
.74
2
"
"
"
ool season (fescue)
"
�
"
"
id
"
"
aha�yy
orghum/sudangrass (chop)
"
"
"
6 1
"
PcC2
ool season grazing (fescue)
"
ool season hay (fescue)
cc
cc
is
orghum/sudangrass (chop)
cc
cc
cc
6a
"
"
orn silage
66"
"
"1
"
46 _]barley
(green chop)
449
rr
1"
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR
DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Depending on waste samples taken, these values may need to be adjusted to more accurately reflect nutrient values of waste
samples. Samples should be taken within 60 days of waste application, preferably before.
22

0
FIELD OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS
NOTE TO FIELD OFFICE PERSONNEL PREPARING THIS PLAN:
The following items and the Required Specifications must be addressed in the Waste
Utilization Plan in order for the plan to meet the minimum requirements of the .0200
rules and NRCS standards. All of these concerns may not he applicable for a given
operation. Additional concerns may have to be addressed at certain operations. These
items express the minimum requirements. Where necessary, the planner/designer is to
elaborate on these concerns or add others as applicable. Comments within these items
that are in parenthesis, are underlined, and are bold typed are for Field Office reference
only and are not to be included in the landowner's copy of the plan. This note is also
provided only for Field Office reference and is not to be included in the landowner's copy
of the plan.
1. The waste utilization plan will include all animal waste generated on the farm.
2. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must be maintained below the
maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event
in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
23

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste, which reaches surface water, is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. (The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has a notarized lone term agreement for use of ade uate land on
which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a
notarized agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the facility to secure an, update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land).
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield
tables at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If a RMS or ACS is used the
soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to
"Buffers" required by DWQ. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard
392 -Riparian Forest Buffer.l
5. Injecting the waste or disking after waste application can reduce odors. Waste should
not be applied when the wind is blowing or any other condition exists which may
cause a danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation -tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment !e forguidance.)
24

M a
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method, which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine, poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent of
the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a concern where diluted, low
nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to occur.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple application at lower
rates should be used. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production &
reduce the potential for pollution, the waste shall not be applied more than 30 days
prior to planting of the crop on bare soil, or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a
lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an
irrigation ditch or canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities sited
on or after October 1, 1995,) shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 39.2 - Riparian Forest Buffer)
25

Ah
�k` IIIICA� 1
yE.
'I
i
0""
ZAT�IC�
F�P-711.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided a "technical specialist" has approved them as a land application
site. Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways, which discharge
directly into watercourses. If animal waste is to be applied on other grassed
waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates and in a manner that causes no
runoff or drift from the site.
lb. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon/holding pond embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special
vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species,
etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon/holding pond areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon/holding pond berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved closure plan" which will
eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
ell

�4 !" 87y4 g9 ""�-F€ � W a j:1.u# S piF1�[�l�i� .�i:d � �,yE .�?7 �i 1'b�:�.} G ����.35➢�.0 }y�. d� �"a3:A _
t�WASTF4g5EC T1 LIZATI3
. <, t'-.-�-...._.....-.--.��.-.""....
g €L
,; f
{ �..`F
.
.b "`!F_4 .1.:.J _; ,34s 3 .� .,..' ]n1.r..I �aY�➢ ", iCD- Y!`]G "�4.�: `.
.....,. ;: ..
_._., - -
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct
human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and
alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. Soil
pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records
shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste
shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations. North
Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that dead animals be disposed of within 24
hours in a manner approved by the state veterinarian.
27

i If �1s am
;,�} ¢ 11VA�RE EU T! 1 Z,r i _ PIL�f y6.#. .-
'..i.61.raL1�....ut�xF
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: _CHAPMAN FARMS ( BILL CHAPMAN )
Oumer/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation
or other equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in
this Waste Utilization Plan. The equipment must be available at
the appropriate time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon,
holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage structure in a 25
year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will
be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate
times and at rates that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: BILL CHAPMAN
(please print)
Signature: Date : 7 1� d 4 O
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist. (please print) STEVE FERGUSON
Affiliation: ALEXANDER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Address (Agency): 255 LILEDOUN ROAD
TAYLORSVILLE, N.C. 28681
Signature: Date: %D v oc>
28

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
pvaadad only if additional land has to 1» laaaad, ato.1
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his/her Waste Utilization
System on acres of my land for the duration of time shown
below. The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Term of Agreement:
19_ to
(Minim, of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(Sae Required Specification No. 2.)
NOTARY
20
29

*
0
0 yield.db
for taylorev Mon Dec 22 11:.a:24
EST 1997
SOIL
CROP
YIELD
LES
TIME OF
APPLY MAX
MUSYM
CODE
CROP NAME
RYE
N/UNIT
APPLICATION
RATE rRR
AcO
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
2.4 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
AcD
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
2.4 TON
.50.00
F-A & S-N
AcD
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- GRAZED
2.0 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
AcD
GLH
GRASS-LEGUNE.MIX
- HAY
2.0 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
ACD
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
1.0 AC
100.00
SEPT-MAR
AcD
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS
1.0 AC
100.00
JUNE-SEPT
AcD
WA
WINTER ANNUALS
1.0 AC
100.,00
SEPT-MAR
ACE
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
2.1 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
ACE.
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
2.1 TON
50.00
F-A C. S-N
Bea
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
3.6 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
BeB
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
3.6 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
Bea
C
CORN
65.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
BeB
CS
CORN SILAGE
20.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
BeB
GS
GRAIN SORGHUM
35.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-JUNE
BeB
SB
SOYBEANS
25.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
BeB
W
WHEAT
35.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
BeC
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
BeC
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
3.3 TON
50.0o
F-A & S-N
BeC
C
CORN
60.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
BeC
CS
CORN SILAGE
18.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
BeC
GS
GRAIN SORGHUM
30.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-JUNE
BeC
SB
SOYBEANS
20.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
BeC
W
WHEAT
30.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
arc
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
arc
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
3.3 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
arc
C
CORN
60.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
BrC
CS
CORN SILAGE
18.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
BrC
GS
GRAIN SORGHUM
30.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-JUKE
BrC
SB
SOYBEANS
20.0 BU
2:00
APRIL-JULY
BrC
W
WHEAT
30.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
BeC2
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
5.6 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
BeC2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
5.6 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
BeC2
C
CORN
85.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
BeC2
CS
CORN SILAGE
20.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
BBC2
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- GRAZED
3.5 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
BeC2
GLH
GRASS-LEGUME.MIX
- HAY
3.5 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
BeC2
W
WHEAT
30.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
BBD2
CSO
COOL SEASON GRASS -GRAZED
TON
37.50'
F-A & S-N
SB02
CS
Corn silage
ton
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
Bull
'ALG
ALFALFA -LEGUME -
GRAZED
1.5 TON
1.50
MARCH-APRIL
SUA
ALH
ALFALFA -LEGUME -
HAY
1.5 TON
2.00
MARCH-APRIL
BuA
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
1.8 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
BuA
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
1.8 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
CeB2
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
C0B2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
3.3 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
CeB2
C
CORN
70.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAX
CeB2
CS
CORN SILAGE
20.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
CeB2
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- GRAZED
2.4 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
CeB2
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- HAY
2.4 TON
40.00
. F-A & S-N
CeB2
0
OATS
70.0 BU
1.30
NOV-JAN
CeB2
SB
SOYBEANS
25.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
CfB
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
Cfa
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
3.3 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
CfB
C
CORN
70.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
CfB
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- GRAZED
2.4 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
4:
N

0
1
CIB
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - HAY
2.4 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
Cfa
0
OATS
70.0 BU
1.30
NOV-JAN
CfB
SB
SOYBEANS
25.0 SU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
ChA
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED,
5.4 TON
37.50
F-A. & S-N
ChA
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
5.4 TON
50.00
F-A. & S-N
ChA
C
CORN
80.0 BU
1.25
APRIL�MAY
ChA
CS
CORN SILAGE
22.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUKE
ChA
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - GRAZED
4.0 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
ChA
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - HAY
4.0 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
ChA
0
OATS
40.0 BU
1.30
NOV-JAN
ChA
SB
SOYBEANS
30.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
ChA
W
WHEAT
30.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
CnF
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
TON
37.50
F-A. & S-N
CaF
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS -GRAZED
TON
37.50
F-A. & S-N
COD
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
F-A. & S-N
COD
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
3.3 TON
50,00
F-A & S-N
COD
OLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX '- GRAZED
3.3 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
COD
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - HAY
3.3 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
'
COE
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - GRAZED
TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
r
DaB2
BOG
BERMUDAGRASS - GRAZED
5.8 TON
37.50 APRIL-AUGUST
DaB2
BGH
BERMUAAGRASS - HAY
5.8 TON
50.00 APRIL-AUGUST
Da52
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
4.8 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
DaB2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
4:8 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
DaB2
C
CORN
90.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
DaS2
CS
CORN SILAGE
20.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
D&B2
GS
GRAIN SORGHUM
60.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-JUKE
DaB2
SB
SOYBEANS
40.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-DULY
DaC2
BOG
BERMUDAGRASS - GRAZED
5.0 TON
37.50 APRIL-AUGUST
DaC2
BGHo BEP14UDAGRASS - NAY
5.0 TON
50.00 APRIL-AUGUST
DaC2
CSO
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
3.9 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
DaC2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
3.9 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
DaC2
C
CORN
70.0 SU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
DaC2
CS
CORN SILAGE
18.0 TON
12.OG
APRIL-DUNE
DaC2
GS
GRAIN SORGHUM
45.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-,TUNE
DaC2
SB
SOYBEANS
30.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-DULY
DOB
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
5.7 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
DOB
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
5.7 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
DOB
C
CORN
115.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
DOB
CS
CORN SILAGE
23.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
DOB
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - GRAZED
3.5 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
DOB
GLH
GRASS-LEGUMH MIX - HAY
3.5 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
DOB
0
OATS
70.0 BU
1.30
NOV-JAN
DoB
SB
SOYBEANS
40.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
DoB
W
WHEAT
55.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
ECD
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
F-A. & S-N
EcD
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
3.3 TON
50.OG
F-A & S-N
ECD
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - GRAZED
3.3 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
'
ECD
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - HAY
3.3 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
ECE
CSO
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
HbC
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
2.4 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
HbC
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - RAY
2.4 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
�_}� rip
HbE
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
1.8 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
o T J �` f��
A
HbE
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
1.8 TON
50.00
F-A. & S N
o4r�esy, � 11►? �We.�
MaB2
ALG
ALFALFA -LEGUME - GRAZED
4.5 TON
1.50
MARCH-APRIL
iI
MaB2
ALH
ALFALFA -LEGUME - HAY
4.5 TON
2.00
MARCH-APRIL
Ma332
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
6.4 TON
37,50
F-A & S-N
MaB2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
6.4 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
MaB2
C
CORN
120.0 BU
1,25
APRIL-MAY
MaS2
CS
CORN SILAGE
24.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
MaB2
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - GRAZED
4.0 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N

MaS2
CLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - HAY
4.0 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
MaB2
0
OATS
7510 BU
1,30
NOV-JAN
MaH2
W
WHEAT
50.0 HU
2.50
NOV-JAN
MaC2
ALG
ALFALFA -LEGUME - GRAZED
4.5 TON
1.50
MARCH-APRIL
MaC2
ALH
ALFALFA -LEGUME - HAY
4.5 TON
2.00
MARCH-APRIL
MaC2
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
5.6 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
MaC2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
5.6 TON
50.00
F-A & 9-9
MaC2
C
CORN
120.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
MaC2
CS
CORN SILAGE
22.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-,TUNE
Mac2
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX - GRAZED
4:0 TON
30.00
F-A. & S-N
MaC2
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX HAY
4.0 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
MaC2
0
OATS
75.0 BU
1.30
NOV-JAN
MaC2
W
WHEAT
50.0 SO
2.50
NOV-JAN
PaD
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS -GRAZED
TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
PaD
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS -HAY
TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
PaD
CS
CORN SILAGE
ton
12.00
APRIL-JUKE
PCB2
BGG
BERMUDAGRASS - GRAZED
3.6 TON
37.50
APRIL-AUGUST
PCB2
BGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
3.6 TON
50.00
APRIL-AUGUST
PCB2
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
3.6 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
PCB2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
3.6 TON
50.00
F-A. & S-N
PCB2
C
CORN
75.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
PCB2
CS
CORN SILAGE
20.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
PCB2
SB
SOYBEANS
25.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-DULY
Pc82
T
TOBACCO
1900.0 LBS
0.12
MAY -DUNE
PCC2
SGG
BERMUDAGRASS - GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
APRIL-AUGUST
PcC2
BGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
`3.3 TON
50.00
APRIL-AUGUST
PcC2
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
2.7 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
PcC2
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
2.7 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
PcC2
CS
CORN SILAGE
18.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
PuC
BGG
EERMUDAGRASS -GRAZED
3.0 TON
37.50
APRIL-AUGUST'
PuC
BGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
3.0 TON
50.00
APRIL-AUGUST
PuC
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
3.0 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
PUC
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
3.0 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
PUC
C
CORN
50.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
PuC
CS
CORN SILAGE
14.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-.NNE
PuC
T
TOBACCO
1600.0 LBS
0.12
MAY-JUNE
RnC
BOG
BERMUDAGRASS - GRAZED
3.6 TON
37.50
APRIL-AUGUST
RnC
BGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
3.6 TON
50.00
APRIL-AUGUST
RnC
CSG
COOL SEASON GRABS - GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
RnC
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS HAY
3.3 TON
50.00
F-A & B-N
RnC
C
CORN
65.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
RnC
SB
SOYBEANS
25.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
RnC
T
TOBACCO
1800.0 LBS
0.12
MAY -DUNE
RnC
'W
WHEAT
30.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
RnD
BGG
BERMUDAGRASS - GRAZED
3.3 TON
37.50
APRIL-AUGUST
RnD
BGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
3.3 TON
50.00
APRIL-AUGUST
RnD
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
2.7 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
RnD
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS ^ HAY
2.7 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
RnE
CSO
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
RwB
BGG
BERMUDAG WS - GRAZED
4.2 TON
37.50
APRIL-AUGUST
RwS
BGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
4.2 TON
50.00
APRIL-AUGUST
RwB
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS - GRAZED
4.2 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
RwB
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS - HAY
4.2 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
RwB
C
CORN
85.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
RwB
CS
CORN SILAGE
20.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
Rw8
SB
SOYBEANS
35.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-DULY
RWB
T
TOBACCO
2500.0 LBS
0.12
MAY -DUNE
RwB
W
WHEAT
40.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
RxA.
BGG
BERMUDAGRASS - GRAZED
4.8 TON
37.50
APRIL-AUGUST
RxA.
SGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
4.8 TON
50.00
APRIL-AUGUST
0

r
r
• RxA
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
5.4 TON
37.30
F-A & S-N
RxA
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
5.4 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
RxA
C
CORN
80.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
RxA
CS
CORN SILAGE
22.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-DUNE'
RxA
SE
SOYBEANS
30.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-JULY
StB
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
4.8 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
StB
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
4.8 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
StB
C
CORN
120.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
StB
CS
CORN SILAGE
24.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUKE
StB
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- GRAZED
5.1 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
StB
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- HAY
5.1 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
StB
SB
SOYBEANS
40.0 BU
2.00
APRIL-DULY
StB
T
TOBACCO
2700.0 LBe
0.12
MAY -JUNK
St8
W
WHEAT
60.0 BU
2.50
NOV-TAN
TfB
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
4.2 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
TfB
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
4.2 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
TfB
C
CORN
95.0 BU
1.25
APRIL-MAY
TfB
CS
CORN SILAGE
22.0 TON
12.00
APRIL-JUNE
TfB
GLG
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- GRAZED
3.4 TON
30.00
F-A & S-N
TfB
GLH
GRASS -LEGUME MIX
- HAY
3.4 TON
40.00
F-A & S-N
TfB
0
OATS
70.0 BU
1.30
NOV-JAN
TfB
T
TOBACCO
2500.0 LBS
0.12
MAY-JUNE
TfB
W
WHEAT
60.0 BU
2.50
NOV-JAN
UdC
AGH
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
50.
50.00 APRIL-AUGUST
UdC
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
- HAY
TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
WCA
CSG
COOL SEASON GRASS
- GRAZED
13.1 TON
37.50
F-A & S-N
WeA
CSH
COOL SEASON GRASS
HAY
5.1 TON
50.00
F-A & S-N
FA

r Jy •
��'`••4 �; "\ten �D£NnR•RALtI���t� t:l';I:.'�'.:� ;�fii�E-' �� l� 4� - ,. • �- �3��,.
• �.4 ',\ � _ ' "�� 1 � ��'L"� . J ' .r.' 1 _ � ii3di owtr 7TI1
01
APR 1, 2 SKI
�.,,/� �1 ram. � ,�` _ ���' - .• i'�' i `� °�'' � ^.`��' 1���'��. � ��- �'� t<
% C2 �i, i':�I•' ,` .� '`'' ;; ,` + ,►�``{ TavlorsvT
�`� "�1, _. 1, f - t r - ✓ � alospftal •+•. , `��i "fib.
/ r�� �� I�r � •��l : Ir'� • ice- a�
� `-'� •�"'.'- 1"_" �'*• 'A Eeisndec iix .r L 'r' WTO °• ` 1 -��' /,v/�, .•
_\\ � , `' _ _ •Centrd Hiah Sth , f ` y"7, xx�' I a1. �„ll s..
Gc1' CatiseJ
Slate - ,
°�'!i
�• / _.... �` - 'fir• w
`'.��. `.,4h ,.� #�3' , .� _ f � ..may::.` .�•.• � .� _ �' ' �ti�l :!-�`ta<,;��r -� ,aL `'�: '
IC, - jj ',. •r r ti • i sf', r ` .
as a ,. a � �•� 1/ h ��� +C � r.Y.
',+ ' ► !�'t 1r �Yr r `4Y4 I , �� '.� ,.r f J Y' • i. yF ' q',
al j it ,�}'' A ,!r •:���.�'^ ���� � I' r�r/ COuai! j V � �r � 4 Y.I .i.'�
!ooIlf6u E �✓f .� • ? 'rl�� i+ !A�. 1rf. •sar

�� rt
l Snaa
R
•j �
I f j She
m k sorr.
ti
St of09a ai
Sage
C"clsla(
lu.
S;"o
di
fssd erg � =� .•i ~ '
o t Y�
o rfaastas{s
iyi � IjS I f/
s

Anifal Waste llana=enent Plan Celicat-ion
(Please tvpe or print all information that does not require a signature)
nxistinQl or Nvv or Expanded (DIe:Le circle one) j
Name of Farm: C%_qn Facility No:-- /..3
0%vner(s) Name: .-- Phone N hlailina?�ddress
60 C1�g. egY Iar3v� Ifs
Owta.1 rw. ►+
Fart Location: Ccunr,:• Farm is located in: Q
Latitude and Lonsirude: 35 41
Please attach a copy of a counry road reap v ith location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions. milepost, etc.): l A ke F�w -, �r 0 w ea f T r e eo rks (L6. Rd
_ -�jr•n R;g�+. �' o asprox 3 M; c.S h �0- -
C?pgration„Description: r�
,ripe oi5,ritre No. of rrtir►tals T%pe of Poulln, No. of .Artimais Tlpe a Carrle No. o> ,Anita D %Venn to Feeder t I ^ , Lave", Dairy &310 h d-
Z Feeder to Finish .D Brf
Farrow to wegrt
Z Farrow to Feeder
J Farrow to Finish 1 ► Other T %;De ot,LivesrocL Number of .animals:
�77 l ref ,,,, �„•.
Erpandurg Operation Only
' Pretiiotrs Design Capacin.: Addiriorwl Design CODacin,: ;` -- 'zs.
Total De:ien Cavacir--
Acreage Available for -Application: 4•S8. 9� Required Acreage: _.2/0.
Number of Lagoons 5toraze Ponds): - /— Total Capaciry: �A Cubic F=t (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or ' �1O (please circle one)
If TES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
M �R Y�F��i!1.\L].M?i iK�atK/MfK.N'.F?F.'�*'i�y�f.�,1���R �K�#�*=fi.'li lRlf.+l yt i}I, 71tY 1K �l7N,Il kt'�1'Mi 1�SILiMf[1f1/i�]S iR lit pile *J�.M'}il J. �t'A, ii'$*iK .'1YR7�t 7t ]R 7s iR
O%vner / Mariam Agreement
I (we) verify that al] the above information is correct and will be updated upoo cltansins. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management =ian for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) )unow that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stockc3 I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly throu2b a man-made convevanea or
from a storm event icss severe than the 35-vear. -hour stone and there must not be ;in -off from the aoali=6on of animal
w•asu. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants ,-torn lounging and heave use areas must be minimized using technical
standards de,, -eloped by the \atuml Resources Conservation Service. Tne appr^v:d pla", will be filed at the farm and at the
orrice of the iocai Soil and Water Con_err_tion Dis::ic:. I ove; kno.v that any modificction must be approved.by a technical
specialist and cubrrtittrd to the Soil and Water Conscr-ation District prior to impie:nentation. A change in land ownership
require: written ncti.ficntion to DELI or a rivx cenif:ration of the approve-d oian is .aangc:'i within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name or Land 0,,%-nlr a ���� _ C �°�h-> ea V --
Slunnture:
Name of dii-ier.n, .*rc,, ov,-n;:r .
Date:_ t21./99
Signature- D:1te:
AIIVC .- irnuLiry :. ?110'

QW)
united States
Department of
Agriculture
0
Natural
Resources
COnservatlan
.Service
_ ` 4
�rriCc
f .,n nAt F1(',N
WASTE NNfALYAGEiDr.NT FACILITY STTE EVALUATION
NANuE 7j�1 l C
0
TELEPHONE
LCC.aTION —IL<S.e_ Foe44s CkIlf -L-k Rd,
SR I1i3
SIZE OPERATION So �K'r5��t r
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODL;C R I SU O FT
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACMrR' (school, church. ft.)� FT'
NC-CPA-1 7
REV. 1, 2-96
IS SITE WriiHN 100-YEAIN R FLOOD PLAN? YES �
NO
If yes, MRCS cannot provide assistance -
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LlYE" PERENNIAL STREAM? YES _
NO ✓
If no, site must be relocated.
Is 5ra WrrmN 1 MII,E ZONING JURISDICTION OF � ,%ffJ* ICIP.aLrrY7 YES _
URI
NO
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval .
ARE UTILITIES IN CONSTRUCTION AREA? `ES —
NO
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site
evaluadoo.
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON -CROPLAND? YES NO ✓
If yes, producer must complete Form NRCS-CPA-38 (Request for Certified
Wetland Determination/Delineation).
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING7 1 YES NO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER. TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF
ENGINEERS AND THE DMSION OF ENV[RONMEN 1'AL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF PER.MM ARE REQUI]tED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY LAN? UNTIL A WETLAND DELINEATION
IS MADE
NRCS will provide technical assistance in wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland
inclusions less than one acre In size, MRCS will provide. assistance only if the functions and values lost are My
mitigated. For natural wetlands greater than one acre in size, MRCS will provide assistance only after a
rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimizadon of impacts, and compensatory mitigation is
carried out in that order of preference.
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED `.VrM PRODUCEIL:
• PREDOMINANT WIND DIRECTION7 YES ✓ `O
• PRECHARGING L CCON WITH FRESH WATER TO .AT LEAST 1/2 YES NO
OF THE CAPACrT'Y?
• USN. G GOOD SMND IUDG%IENT IN L kND .APPLICAT?ON YES ✓ NO
OF WASTE?

NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-96
Page 2
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT? YES _ NO !�
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED N THE PLANNING AREA OR ✓
WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC .AREA? YES NO
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR WSTORICAL SITE LOCATED N THE PLANNED AREA? YES NO ✓
ARE THERE PRIIME, UMQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY N, LPORTANT F.AR.%tLA.NDS N THE YES'— NO
OPERATING UNIT7
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES NO
If the answer to any of the above is yes, *ARCS will not provide technical
assistance unless agency policy is followed.
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY "ND APPLY ALL WASTE YES V NO
INCLUDING SLUDGE, ALTHOUGH SLUDGE IAAY ONLY BE .APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
IF NO. DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE "ND? YES _ _/ NO
-IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET ACREE*MENT ON LAND YES ✓ NO ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE?
(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL I3WESTIGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOIL
SHEET ATTAL-HM
IS SOH, SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
IS A LINER REQUIRED?
TYPE OF LINER TO BE USED:
IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON
SITE?
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON Snl� DOES LANDOWNER HAVE
ACCESS TO CLAY?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
(Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.)
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT?
(If yes, the must be mmoved or plugged)
YES _✓ NO
YES ✓ NO w
CLAY ✓BENTONTTE Sl-nI E ITC
YES --te, NO
YES _ NO
YES NO
4 /
YES NO ✓
SITE APPROVED YES NO CONDITIONAL
COMMENTS
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID FOR TWELVEMONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRUCTION
HAS NOT BEEN STAR D N TWELVE MON S, ANEW SITE INVESTIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED. 1�
SIGNATURE C" DATE L' 97
Changes is the local or state law or ch=gcs in the standard could require a new site nvestigation.

I
C6
S 2
AL
w
61
49
11
- ti-
K
C•
6
•
IL
SAMPLES
ie
IL
LZ-
46
u
k-
USC3
SYMBOL
RUN i
OEM
DEPTH (rr)
I I
lev.11 I
i rr"
Lfalrlr
-2
Mo
79 ,
Ilz
V)
Z�
u
Uscs
SYUBOL
-771T�
RUM j
DEPTH

•o
•
� � '�
O
w
N
M
e
M
N
e
;
�
fV
Y
w
w
_
�
�
rdpi
ui
y •p °
c S v
�
OL
�
Mai
�
� A
o
�
u :
hN
er
as
6
s
Henn
I -
C
�
M°EHr
a
.
uscs
SYMBOL
.�
G .
G�
RUM f
l-
ot""
DEFTW {rr
e�
Z- 1It.1
Ulf
o
e
9
SAMPLES
}
u
IL
dL
uscs
3TMS0L
,1 s. i
RU11
b[►n1 R
I
A
r<
13

u . .
0
5
APR I�
A Haste Storage Pond
prepared for
iri
alexander County, North Carolina
Designer : ra
Date : 06/20/97
THE RECOMMENDED DIMENSIONS ARE:
Shape ........... - Rectangular
Top dimeneions .. 170 x 83 ft,
Bottom Dimensions m 113 x 26 ft.
,Sidealopes ..... = 3.0 :I
Actual depth = 915 ft.
Design depth 8.0 ft.
Freeboard ...... m 1.5
Depth when 1/2 full - 5.2 ft.
Depth when 3/4 full - 6.8 ft.
us mwartwmt of awrxeulturr.
"acural x1foureas Carssrvaeioa sorvlce
Checker
Date
THIS FACILITY IS DESIGNED FOR THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
-type of.animal-- -number- -weight- -waste- -days-
Dairy, Lactating 175 900 l.bs. 1.32 CuFt/1000 18
180 Days storage (October thru March )
875 galJday of additional waste water.
20.4 inches of rainfall over the design period.
11.3 inches of evaporation over the design period.
5.5 inches of rainfall for a 25 yr. - 24 hr. event.
10300 eta. ft. of feedlot and roof runoff.
When hull, this facility will contain 56336 cu.ft.( 421.393 gall of waste.
t more a

w
(continued) page 2
ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL DESIGNS:
Depth w/ freeboard
7.5
9.5
11.5
Top dimensions (ft)
170 x 99
170 x 83
170 x 77
Bottom diman, (ft)
125 x 54
113 x 26
101 x 8
Sideslope
3 :1
3 :l
3 :I
Animal Waste (cu.ft.)
3742
3742
3742
Total, Volume (cu.ft.)
F2424
56336
52780
THIS DESIGN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS:
The percentage of rainfall that runs off the feedlot is 50 �.

Waste Storage Pond
Manure Volume .........
Bedding Volume ........
Waste Water Volume
Feedlot Runoff ......
Rain & 25 yr. Volume ..
Needed Volume .........
Available Volume ......
1,742
Q
21, 013 , 4 Si..-4
--Y7;T0 $
55,361
56,336
06-24--199? i5:oo:21

APR 1 . 2.
DEHNR RP,LL4C�i ��1 G1Q�iAT tiQ
r
-5q -9.c) 2: j S5
_ -4 5 495 � 3
I Bo
Zoa
ny= 263 � j

2 5 �A
c 30
�71 5
75
3 O} 5�, 2_ ], 3 + ` p t>� 3 cj 3
Oita,- � Y
zoo

FIRfA�4O
PR15MO1DAl. CE
og
wsD
OR1G1N SURFACE
FINAL- 14ON FACTOR
FACYOR
t3.0O %
0,(10 GY
F C{7UMpAC [ION
S VOLUME
VGLUrh
.i740.22
264Y CY
RAw Fti-U
C" o
C3 C)
a� �J�—

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
�--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
�. Chapman Dairy Farm
DENIER 1�i�1.�4G- R'�GIC���1L �Ff10E
�_,__-_ Alexander County, North Carolina
Bill Chapman Owner/Operator
Designed for a herd size of 250 milking animals
In Cooperation with
Alexander Soil and Water Conservation District
And
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Cost Share Funding provided through the
N.C. Agricultural Cost Share Program
Revised 7/99

0
•
January 15,1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
Pa
1. CONTAMINATED LIQUID WASTE HOLDING POND 3
2. IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM
4
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM 4-5
4. SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE 5
GENERAL COMMENTS 6
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following major components:
1. CONTAMINATED LIQUID WASTE HOLDING POND
2. IRRIGATION AND SYSTEM
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
and the following associated components
4. SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and stored in a SOLID WASTE STORAGE
STRUCTURE (dry stack). Solid waste will be loaded from the SOLID WASTE STORAGE
STRUCTURE into a manure spreader and land applied at agronomic rates. The SOLID WASTE
STORAGE STRUCTURE is designed to provide Ninety (90) days storage for the solid wastes
produced by 250 head milking herd. Storage capacity based on the cows being confined to
the lot less than 50% of the day.
All contaminated runoff will flow into the WASTE STORAGE POND. This structure is
designed to provide storage for (90) days of normal rainfall runoff from the feedlot, leachate
from the silos and provide storage space for the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour
storm runoff from the feedlot. The contaminated liquid is then irrigated on field #2 of tract
#1659. Wastewater from the milk barn is collected in a septic tank, transferred to a collection
box and then released into drain field lines.
NOTE: The Waste Storage Pond was designed large enough to hold the waste from the
milk barn in case the septic system failed at some point in the future.

This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste
Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm, as
required under the Non -discharge regulations.
All maintenance and operation costs are the responsibility of the landowner and cannot be cost
shared.
1. CONTAMINATED LIQUID WASTE HOLDING POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff and leachate from
the silos. Additional storage space is included to contain the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four
(24) hour storm runoff from the feedlot. A four (4) inch Schedule 40 PVC pipe will be installed
in the pond, with the level of the endcap indicating the level of storage available prior to
infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity.
OPERATION
The level of management for the entire system will determine the service life of the WASTE
STORAGE POND. How effectively the lot is scraped and your ability to time the scraping of the
lot before each storm event will determine the amount of solids, which reach the WASTE
STORAGE POND. Once the solids have reached the WASTE STORAGE POND, how
effectively the waste is agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the WASTE
STORAGE POND.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WASTE STORAGE POND.
The accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND
to a point, which requires removal of the solids for many years IF adequate lot scraping and
waste agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid accumulation
of solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to the point
that some form of dredging will be required. If a large volume of solid waste is allowed to wash
from the lot and/or if inadequate agitation is performed, this dredging operation could be required
in a very short period of time.
If at any point in the future the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND becomes
reduced to the point that solids must be removed, the removal of these solids will be at your
expense. This would be part of the maintenance of your system and cannot be cost shared.
MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a
vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing
operations must take place only when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be
mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time. See CRITICAL AREA PLANTING
for further maintenance requirements. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage should be reported
to the Alexander Soil & Water Conservation District office.

0
2. IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The IRRIGATION AND AGITATION SYSTEM consists of a Solid Set Gun Irrigation System.
See the irrigation design data sheets for more details.
OPERATION
Alexander Soil & Water Conservation District staff and/or USDA -Natural Resources
Conservation Service staff will be present during the first irrigation operation to assist in
determination of optimum equipment calibration level required.
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full storage level
marker in the structure. When the liquid level in the WASTE STORAGE POND reach's the
marker, liquids must be removed by pumping from the structure into the irrigation system. Do
not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate on frozen or saturated
soils. Irrigate only until soil is near saturation point.
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly agitate the waste in the lagoon. For
irrigation, install the sprinklers in the quick couplers as matched on the plan, check all valves,
make sure no manual drains are closed and only lateral valves that have sprinklers are open, open
discharge gate valve 1/a, prime and start pump. Once water is discharging from sprinklers, open
discharge gate valve fully. Set time control switch for time pump is to run. It is recommended
that the sprinkler operation be checked frequently during operation. See irrigation design plans
for further information.
MAINTENANCE
Soils test the irrigation fields annually. Vegetation in the irrigation fields should be inspected
periodically to insure a vigorous stand. Fields may also need to be limed and fertilized annually.
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM consists of three (3)
pre -cast concrete drop boxes (one is an existing drop box) with neoprene "boots" cast into the
PVC pipe and one 1,500 pre -cast transfer collection box. Structure (1) collects lot water runoff
and leachate from silos and transports it through 127' of 6" PVC pipe into structure (2).
Structure (2) collects lot runoff and leachate and transports it through 201' of 6" PVC pipe into
the transfer collection box. The remaining lot water runoff is collected in an existing settling
basin and existing drop box and piped to the transfer collection box through 82' of 6' PVC pipe.
The wastewater collected in the transfer collection box is pumped by a sump pump through 285'
of 4" PVC pipe to the WASTE STORAGE POND.

ij
The 4" and 6" PVC Pipe will be completely or partially buried. It is recommended that a clean
out be installed in the PVC Pipe at the places indicated on the design drawings. The
contaminated water once pumped from the transfer collection box will empty onto a curbed
concrete splash block located in the Liquid Waste Pond. All exposed pipes will be coated with
an UV protecting paint. An animal guard will be installed in the pipe at the holding pond outlet
end.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION AND
PIPING SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed. Inspect
the drop structures seasonally and remove accumulated solids. Annually inspect the pipe
coating, and clean and re -coat as needed.
In periods of cold and subfreezing temperatures, inspect the pipe for accumulation of ice by
CAREFULLY removing the cap of the clean out. Caution: If liquids have accumulated in the
pipe above the clean out, the force of these liquids tends to "blow" the cap of the clean out off
during removal. Remove any ice manually or by melting with hot water.
4. SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE (DRY STACK)
OVERVIEW
The SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE (dry stack) is designed to store ninety (90) days
accumulation of solid wastes produced by a 150 head -milking herd. The SOLID WASTE
STORAGE STRUCTURE consists of a reinforced concrete slab with 2 inch by 6 inch (2"x 6")
tongue and groove planking, wooden columns and a roof structure. A concrete unloading pad is
at the entrance to the structure. One side of the structure will have guttering included to divert
non -contaminated rainfall runoff.
OPERATION
Waste will be scraped on a regular basis, preferably daily. Whenever weather, soil and crop
conditions permit, the waste should be loaded directly into a solid manure spreader, transported
to the application field and applied according to the WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN. When
conditions do not permit immediate application, the solid waste will be scraped into the SOLID
WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE until conditions do allow application. Waste should be land
applied in such a manner and at such times as to take advantage of the maximum available
nutrients from the manure for crop growth. For optimum nutrient utilization, waste should be
land applied and incorporated into the soil. See the WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN for further
details of application.
MAINTENANCE
The SOLID WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURE will need to be inspected periodically. Inspect
all metal components to ensure that galvanized coatings are in good repair and that no rust has
formed. Clean and re -coat as needed. Inspect wooden components for mechanical damage or rot
and repair or replace as needed. Inspect the concrete for major cracks. Contact the Alexander
Soil and Water Conservation District for technical assistance with concrete repair.

;7
0
PESTICIDE USE
GENERAL COMMENTS
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation,
especially that of the dam, is not adversely affected, It is a violation of law to use any pesticide
in a manner not permitted by its labeling. To protect yourself, never apply any pesticide in a
manner or for a purpose other than as instructed on the label or in labeling accompanying the
pesticide product that you purchase. Do not ignore the instructions for use of protective clothing
and devices and for storage and disposal of pesticide wastes, including containers.
Notify the Alexander Soil and Water conservation District if repairs or major modifications are
required for any of the components of this Waste Management System.

.
Widch
urial three feet beneath the surface of the ground withi
hours after
k-nowiedp of the death. The burial muu- be at I&-st 300 fett
;M4 any flowing
A= or public body of wamr.
.'ar a rendering p1mic licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Rendering
Complete incineration
In the case of dyad poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of
i size and design
approved by the Departmac of Agrlcalture
U
Any method which in the professibnzI opinion of the State V
cccrinsr= would
make possible the salvagc of part of a dead animal's value wi hour endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the Scare Vetifinarian
must be
e.-Tibe'.. is. 1446

Trisect Cuntl•al Checklist. for Animal Operativris
Canse DAIPs to Control Insects Site Specillc Praclkes
l t l� [itaticre • Acrinn+datiorr orsoiA O blush systoar Is desigised surd apcmIcd
s+slticknily to rernove ncconjulated sallds fiorrs t � -
gutters as ticsigtred- V
— _ -- - -- — - --Itcrrovff baidgfrrgv nciinurrhit hsvtIdsirt- - --------- ---- -` T
__ _ ttlsdrargc
14nvrr i slid MIS t iculrcl 5vlitis Muirailln Inngmus, sdtriug Gaslns and salts where -�
lest breeding Is,ysimrcrsl to arinhnize Ilse
cruising or solids to a depth of no nwre tbari 6 -
8 inches over ►nare lhaa 30% of smi-fim -
tingAvc Vegetative Uccaying vcgetafiun Maintain vegetative Control almig hanks of
Growth lagoons and ulhet ioipoundnrcigs to prevent
accauruiaiian ordecayhng vegetative matter
along %vatcrs edge on Intpoundinarrs perinscter,
C�
Dry Syslcrns
r s - I;ivdSfslfirrge Vcsign, ol►ernle mW tnahtlnin feed systems (e_g..
s bnnkets and Iruugln) to »riuirnize 11te
. ! accurnaiallon ofdecaying Wastage.
V( Qcari up slzil Inge an a roullne basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during ssrrnnier, f 5-30 day latcrvnl
RI durbig wialer).
F e Accumulations offeed residues 16 Itcduce moisture numntdation withbr and
around itmnccAate perimeter of feed storage
areas by Instrring chainage away front site
ancVcrt provWing Klequate corriafnnteld (e-g.,
covueJ bltt for brctivices grain and shullnr higls
' / ttoislnrc grain pro&wU).
T ® Inspect rat and rehiuve or break up accumulated
solids lit filter sItIln arotnul food slorago as
weeded.
11, 1996, rage I

Scarce
Cntlsc
liMI's to Conlrul Inserts
Site Speeltie Prucliecs
Aii js�Wdbtg Areass%Arcuultdnliwtc
afarllnull u►:sslcs
lilhuilmlc Iow sass Aral trap rouisture slung
Mid fci d wasrago
fences and ulher k1=11Cm3 where ►rtlsle
disiur6.-nue by Is
a CCU11111wes.and nuiurnts
.
t�nllniinal,
Whilalu felt= tuivli and tiller strips rtrtrnad
arlineal lnridiug sntas to Ininlrrlixe
accuutulntions of wastes (Le., lnspcci for mid
remove or bm;ik up nccutuulated solids ns
ti liNiuiu Naltiliing •
Acctuniti:tllutns of nni1nal kvwteS IV
wtdi
12e11tOVC spillage toil a rumble bmb (e.g., 7 = I�
S Is
dny interval thning sumnux; 15-30 dny Inlem. I
during wbiter) where mnnura is kmdcd r'or laud
npplicatiott or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage atourid manure
stce#p;ies.
Inspeci fur sad roinove ar break tip nccaluuhalcd
wastes bt filler strips around Stockpiles and
inwwre bmidling arens as needed.
�tir,tirlilrC IIiI Irn1rM1011 ClN1lad
iht` C.Srt>1lerntiYC 1sxlctlsiVll Service, Delmilment
of l'.11tuniology, Box 7613, NOW i Carolirl.'1 State
University,
1011—e fit. H , 27695-7613.
..
e
t
I Y„���T r4,• - ,
11. 1996. Paige 2 ,.

i-
• "lily
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
niece Ill1 Vx to Minimize Odor Slle: specific Practires
pruducliurr Ve gelallva or tvooded buffers ,
MJ Recommended hest nrnrimgenicnl practices w� ice" „c o A"'
/ 1
[icroillurllyttcei1 mid corruiwn sense
ituitrre-CoVcird-styfaces - iT-_—
I�Zi hrolnoie drying w1th pruper veutiiullwi
)� R-mithic cliecks uml manelcomice on miicri'rs,
hydr:rids. pipes, cluck tanks
• Vrine
• 1'201111 microbial decuailmshiou
• i'ar#ial miereiliitsl deumynrsitiwe
• 1'arllnl niicroblid timmnlnisition
• N ixiiig while lilfing ;
• Agilallon whom ionplying .
Prolnote drying with proper veulik'Llion
Repince tvcl or tirantere-eovered Redding
Provide liquid dmInnge for stoned lnaorrrc .
U Hollom orinld-level loadhig
e 1
Twill covers i�eeP..S Cpv4Zr-N I-J I' 0ICiC�
Cl Basin surface unals iif solids;
C) 1411kind7c lot runoff and liquid additions
l� Agitate wily Ixiar to manure renvivni
_ ng pain strr[aces •
partial niicrttbial cktoriipvsitiun
�
Uquid diairruge reach settlml solkis
_
•
Mixing velrile filling
Remove solids regularly
_ `0
AChAhm witeri emptying
tit slurry or sludge a
Agitation when sln•ctttling
Cl/
soil b jeetiau of s1prry/sludges
---
sl ttdsr oattels a
Vokilile gas emissions
B
Wash residual inmiure Trott► sprcatkr nller we
-X
-
Cl
l'reaxcn biolagif:al atldillvcs or oxidants
4
MjTiav�eied nimme, +
Volatile gas enlissiuns while
C]
Soil 'srjectiatl of allury/sludges
sk*y.w sludge oil field
diyhig
Id
WSprend
Soil incorporation %vitliin dli 6rs.
•I i
cAhJ�•.� �a/� trM r t(e� o
stitfaers
hi {hln uniforin layers forrailild dryuig
Cl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
1•i mks •
Agifplion of recycled Ingaun
0
(:lush look covers;
_
" -
liquid while (slates are filling
O
>-Mend fire lines to near bottom of leaks with
. °
anli•-siphon vciils
>rsilledliuu
AgRalim dwing wtisicivalar
lien covers
-----
WA!,s: 4b_ uses
cunveyi+ace
ya � ,
. ,_ `itivenrlmr I I, 191i'i,
Inge I

aka _,.•
source
,
Cause
Ill►.:•a la MinfrMtrx Ocinr
Site Specific Prncliccs
1, ll stations
Agilnliun during sump lank
Sinrip lank corers . 1/ g s �
idling ninl drawdolen
"Valer
lri l ardralujillms at
Agitnliun dilring wwol of
Extprd discharge point of pipes tinderucath
lagoon liquid
p- tfE - .
capveytnice
level
7
unrt surfaces •
Yulatlile gas ctnissioit,
Proper lagomi llipiki capacity,
■
illolugtcal cubing; If
Correct fngoon shulup procedures;
_
_-.. ... _..... •
/16iIiil�olt. - ® l i F cikle-vo e l ,—.
Mililmuar ugittulou %,Ater ptutiiiing;
-
. f]
MCCilaulepl Aeration
O
Provett biuiggicM additives
"
•t k(bg! n spriaklm- ■_
digit Inessure aglladon; ❑
1nigUe oil cky days w[di little or no whiel;
+
•
Ward drill d
Mbiiruum reminiended uperatfng Itrocedurc;
CA
❑
I'tnup ittlAc neitr Avon liquid surface;
!
©
114sup froin second -stage ingoom,,
!
Ifl
C1
Phish residual nruarre rrwn li'lpes at end'of
larrylsludbc ptullphigs
p►j ' rats •
CM-cnss decwnposiliutl 11'roper
disposhlart of carcaesscr -
(� _ C�,n. ; zJ i C ¢.
pier nrouiul '
lsrrprtgscr draigagc;
Garde and Iand scnpe suds lbal waterdrnitis
away limo raCllltie5
MIL icbiul dccomiwsiilon of
organic nsaller
i�Wded onto public +
poorly lnnuslalned access roads VV
Vnrnt P=ess toad nlninte tinca V
h+y+--y►�+-v.r�es..4-
'yam�,�l'iosss rnnu access
.AOO*lal I itrumitdion :
AvaMlu From
•
NCSU, Courtly EXICnskilt
k _. LElre Maitageuienl ;
UZUQ Ilule/dhiP Packet
Cetrler
0*-Educallonal Unh Manure Maangcsoenl Syslcm - Lake Wheeler Road Yield Laboralory ; EBAE 209-95
NCSU - IIAI:
and Mallppincul for i.ives{ock Manure'frennttent atid'Slorage; Csi3AE 103-83
NCSU-DAC
.La'amVesiga
rageittenll orllaky Wosleevnler ; EBAE 106-83
NCSU - IIAE
COiiln-tttiwt of Manure mid Woste.valer Applicu lon Crlalilrincal ; EIIAC
Pact Slieel
NCSU - BAC
VW. —Mice Concerns in Aithstal Matnrre Managenienl:'Qdors and Plies; PRO107. 1995 Confeintsce 11ruerrdiugs
f-lor'eakr Conperaiive i;slptslal
'A,#O€)L-- iHoverutwr 11, 1996,
Page %
y

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
In case of an emergency with the storage pond such as overflow; breaching, leakage, or
the need for emergency land application, the following actions should be taken:
(1) Call -the Division of Water Quality to report the problem immediately. Your
regional office of NCDEHNR-DWQ is located in Mooresville, NC.
Address: NC Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone]
If the emergency happens outside of normal business hours call the NC Emergency
Management Office in Raleigh at [phone] and ask them to contact DWQ. Give
them the name of the facility, location, and DWQ registration/certification number.
(2) Call 911 or the Sheriff's Department at 632-4659 if there is danger to downstream
property such as residences, roads, etc.
(2) Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the problem to minimize off -
site damage. Some of the contractors in your area include:
Bill Little 632-5422
Gaither Barnes 632-6218
Ray Barnes 632-3214
(4) Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond. If this
specialist is no longer working contact the NRCS Area I office in Waynesville at (704)
456-6341 or [phone].
Technical Specialist: David Clay
Address: P.O. Box 974
207 West Main Street, Federal Building
Wilkesboro, NC 28697
Phone: [phone]
(5) In case emergency spreading of waste is necessary to prevent overtopping or other
discharges, please refer to your spreading records and the waste utilization plan to locate
fields in which existing conditions would allow for the spreading of waste, for the
specific application rates and minimum buffer areas. These fields could include any of
the following:
Tract #
Field
1659
1,2,3,4,5,E
1591
1,2
1325
1,2
This EmergencyErntEgency Action Plan should be posted in a readily available location.

J
,2 REEF
i1pV�- .1 1
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SWCD
NRCS
This plan -will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to -consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff front waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)'that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
December 18, 1996

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.,..
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: - Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location, or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
2 December 18, 1996

r
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS. Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
h
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
December 18. 1996

i. •
MAP SHOWING THE FIELDS TO BE USED FOR THE UTILIZATION OF WASTE.
APR 1t 2 i
.DE�lIvR RliLiriG�-! )-iclilui�„�. �� F�L�:
in 10

p
L
I
a
o,61

.f "�*arr63C yw•' p [ l r•.µ sa-_ y�7ja T•- � � '.t 'FRi{,,,'cY"r,,,° aR •7,� -
a,- �,� t ,., {•4 _ H , P� � 1 'R5, Sr Fk�. !'h. n F'�"f„"6tt._S n kY- f :F Yr K •i�,fn
°<� r ,w, .�� [(,+. �, lyl _F�a fd - , `4"f h •I w r � ,'"�•1ir; c �lr1Lrir'i,�'-..,•f , �+, ',=?s �,-7�x'�'y�R ''1t -r �aS `=
I r.tii•I, s r� i r�',r i - � %'.~'�'�r, .9 yL 1' y;r S4r a S .r�� Y '{ t � �, ° F.t� � � 7f<3.C. P•J � y � - �:J r� „ft �'.Cj,r.` �`� x V �p
II+� fl r.�, E'a'W t i1� .�>� a M1rr `� ��. L4` J t� ��� r s � �f•'k.i, 'F����ry-,, _ {�d'��•��� yh� ' �tr,y {a'�bL �1`Yt' •°'�
rr { S 4 r: w ,! � 4 rr � .,,{ � 4r'�.. t c 9� s � l r iy✓'� Es'Y k'.�
_ r.l.- 6r� yV l H r4�� I -'i JL Y•i � . r .y �'f � JT'! C ..r' :6r.� k+ -'
r ii - -. I tia.+ � r .i -1 f T ��4iJ1.'� •��i ,�yV �"� kr?Ny i�- f ��Vp4 ,S�f� ti;�{ '"'3L .t� f r. w
�. Y''^; r7. Y l 1' 4 r .:S• ., 7c r T,,, ti +r j, A.Re1^'il ,� 7�rrtA �5�`� �+ot' _ 'x �' "'-vJ +.Y t�'?,?f r 'E �'
�
7t"r 4 s i 7 .;.h- �,,. � nr•Gf 1i. C � ,e�,
a A�fl?y4. '_s•�„i'Ry. -' r` tir-s,y 2 - I ,�6F'�7 r � M '4•"�;ii'�,y� �%'�=s •rg''M � �� r.E� "' - t' S
is F r � ti� �f� 4.•* � r 7V t - � r.iY [ E 1�:. t �� .��
•,t .r. iJM,'-- 1 .A � "V t f - .2 ; " it ✓r' �," A Y�' fr• F .
sk 11i'/r
i Jr.:•i=+In.y�3k�aA g _.,t i,n �rr.: a-rt !r rr't F'¢'.;•a 'x�r j., C.sS -"'ir
�
;� �Jr I r< �4h•r' � ', 1F lc�;.(' {s°,rye, ^Aai�;�r, k1t "'�i •,� 'ls �tik�°��{.-��„r�r.E! Z t Paz iY.`G}` � �,$ �kk �
y'y;,� `-'� _ �'^lirr t v �`e. `.•w�'{.S_; f r Y•r,�r'' `t �- Y:� '�7A rt .. b{-�^ i��. } i [$�,*R •.-KI :e �, n.
1S•,-';4"s•x ryJ �ry , ..+`^ f .,r - i 1•
a!f dr. r s .7r �'nxF! f•' . �.lr _t. - Ft s •„4 r ,t r i.i / 4 - 1
��s'r"•71a;� A 4l� � Ir V, Rr},S,�,I i •' >. v.5' t�'✓�
- r: � t'r�l. w, § v�+�p k' `a ram. P •,� I
_1 �s'1'S' Trti� sfr.. 'rY .ti t ti (rri.i;r+q ` _ Y
�67s`1','i.{6a5 ;�{ii�•rt' �.,y �klSt�S-� '� yS'�I'X"{yV�, � s:�ir�'q '�C,'f iRS C.•*S•1-k{� ,y,r tcy/f;'}� �'Mwrvsi I`_ - i .r: r»
1 .�- y R p i � Y. rrn f.r- rw �, •, _ F t,, ,�'Y t -}. -. r � lKi�• tl Ks� , �?ti,` �
-;E:�b �" !!'r'�;'°- ,�'sy'wds.,}< ;r �-+,:!.�:' - 6- hk :.1; ;,,t•S�t.rr.'°�-'mr 6. �i .; �"+ :F
,F T..;; ',J- r v�, !fv.:T '• r i-""i,t'.^' s" 1 '!'�.+a }1'f i .i.-
,';ifr 11"t-Ys'"^v �I. ''ittu+ °•' :ti .f :•;`..:_,i'.; fr{ rst �: fJ
r L r' V -r 4i •,F [+ .' i:` •...�±r_ I _ .�TV1 a ! r t
'1 ,i .t y r .T r'J, r+ °kMwr'+'a 44 1't 1 V
ti h c r c H y 17Cr ti. i r ��r.
! t �.: t --�:,, f"}Sa {'3Y�•r, ''a
J
' ,� ••r pp r'7� } �6 ' �.r. r 'r � .}� y (A'yl..`/� Id � �. f�y a,ti� � f -
�,''
�- ;•yry,a f �{xt,f EI d i1 1 T-s� y r t -r� '�r� `3. ,•. _ r RC yt o+ ti r.,
N :�,'L't'f ��1,r � st {� r,.R"'t�� r { �r'� L� 17 ,x FM Snx. �a ``i. i; 1„< •,.i. - .:., „ !t � kt�i - r .� s ti
'i 1(y' .. r•., r �'
4i+�S-R+, , s r a I , I . r r.,�• �iRy �,,,,, r c.
'. i1 � +�tz-� 1`•:t � � �nt Sr:3�6:J ;sA • r- ' � -fir r E {P+ - -� Y ti k i� 3 1L + '`
jt I lf6.1�{ -3 n1 } ) t �,r ♦ - � Fri• y� 'T
;r. �k1�F •�I��r �'l��1���,5 e4r'��' ! rry'f.r li�l�x' i ti•�. A�:•' / --r RF" � yl ;.I u .� °'>„r-�uv�'�Y'ii�. 'sy r.,r.� F "t, � a
.% a 3�iI,' x - r;r:.� 'J:l' cS .; .,; •s ,. l � y r�. 6L r<y, 'j' R'7„ i. ,.4 "i' { ,�`•y rxt•'1 p.n �r r
�G'kr A4! ai.- r nd5 '�• 1 u at J '14 ,6,* tr � i':t ° i i � jr"1`e-Y��y ..r� y�
-r
r1- � t � o� w !6i iia'.!' }-�._.., �" (.�y � �K�p ,f � 1, " �•E j F I.
-'I �,. nSr-Rf rt#v r{I +19' ti7 s. �.1 =t�"4 � rji fi r, I t,�y •_
w�"�s4 t �, w(� r •r#13r•Y Y 14 .� � t r r tiy,,.. ,�'��nz s r
".IIg��� �'��kr�"'•'�'"'.k'ar'�, fep� } rr'`' �� ,''��� �'�'� tir'-�f>i�t;p,"'��as;�aT'�4. t
jjj
-�-LridJ�! r- .� tj �4�_�.'i#' �•aF� ��F .,i -�1.., vti�f�� +��`2�q�0i3�YVs r `r: rr .r
S
1?�#k j,.�yks
k* aat ,tt Iy1441%r" 6 t 7 } AU.1 hb. II, iF f� f tN afr 1 a ! 1 r r
b. I { 1yM a xr,� 1•r+�s ' t� r ,� 7,. T '''
ii yEl .�'-�i x ry Zr r}: -�. )y; ��M 3:�.' ' i S rr ��r� ��' hr:' s� :�`•s t'
�n"rE'h 1 t r l _- +` a r b � i'�j�' _ �.• ,t
{Ho
1„�atCkE �_,}�I � •�� {�i6c�5�=kt �{i- w �r r i`'�Ua• .e r r >, � x v } � ;�;-�'.%"s .} ° „7, .•�:' �" -
t
J t'e Sf y f "�a Il6 r '7i yl�S # 1 ra+rN W J ° r ° ' -�. 4Rr 6S (ifs L ; w i : -•r
y ti r t t art, r:n t.' a y. �v �I F r 4 • y r Is � ; - 41. �i6 �r w 'T ,?:
r tiS ,�
".
frt p � �"°ra' +i. 1- a \ a ir.ir� r J. C. 's tt -•. '?' d° u.,;•:
Ak�'li}�' N 1 - �, t S rr r r x 1t U k :a- - i . J„y Y 6I i } I aJ 3- t Y �'A-r �• 6 t 4 � - �`':'"+, +. - i.�•
!^ tr w t
r r i '^ jr r+I r4 r I fRr ;" 4'r T..r' -Ir I
yr
- e " y�" .6A ,se "6r' -F- j , •a r : / 't-„�^»-,S ; `5 •.?; i.-'..
11,.r �" i ` ry J ;tv `✓ F a '. ,kywti?^.. ' e T r." 1. t r� + li �1 J,.._.
lF-y{ A
1, • •L t. `, alic xb •'r s 'j.• } - a�S1�rF: L: �i �I.. y'I11 JrF 7��.y�, ��: �rri"t ti5 t °+hi,F.,.' � r ?, ftr r:5t :-43,=.
rrl,�+Ei: r '€E` 1'i'n �Jy`6.r1•� t=r i• t r�,�r �'ty"wli rr' �;wy7r`�^ •R!' r 'hka r+l. �-� •t t,trk'f'..'�4 ! i Y'�� S ,..,r
(j�
}I 1 d qft.r?tiy�
.�yArY•'•ss ti:RSt r." � R - i,r t r r. �;' � tl 1, ,, �h It � 1 f u } h S r: n• d p ry w tr { J _ r� i _* � I '. yr t s�:r-[ 1 S rat_
��i, "W YiW%'C' �++'t },�,r S B y s t - r IR a:vl �i. ', is i I� ar y; � ui5 u,]-.Y� ' ' a6 t 3 � f Z'� +•-�1- y - rlra, � - sf'.
.a�41::t�,; r1t'r �" 3 y = E t ;r.' � t.'ti-4• '� srs}�'ti ;L � �l r w 't n -� tPLM u . � - r - vF rr, _ F.,r( � r. -a, � r'Jr'. _ �`t r � 6.y
rrr-''rj
t
i•,J it °`a ��'" • L ' r 15
�rY :�$� ,r,���Gw L� �• a' r � 6 r !; �t'4. �� t .v �'i�tx, l' Z r r f ' e 1 Lr .,'.'� t. ,� �' S•-y r r It "�.i
y�,�Rtc { rr�a } ;'il � � 'r �: s• - r--.t 1-}n �.s�t �F. N�, Fa.�rr•� :'^� rtry :ti j C - ;� � a'�E�,. t- �1 hir- a. t -, w, ! stir *u"nJ `' �, r' •. �..
,�,' it �[ ;ril :r r Y ' t� rn{ f r `T.',� 4° d.l. �l��- ci•. �1�'x �,i�S'd;�� 1jJ. t yt. F r iy r�, e4 w`+ ,i F-�_ yL r ty �J �6 s' � tt re i-'•.
�T ��y-�`. ?7irT 1''. �t' r r ti - 'I. � n yy r 1} Zi � �,,5"'" kL fr•Fe �,*, I n i •r_r 1 •r I - ••n• ';,. i t r,�'
N'♦ •f {,. ... r Yr✓�>'. 4 L. i i G _ S � '� r r r -i 'c -•ie e 5 . r s >
_ •, t r - - Jam.: -f 4.� -
;rFr.;^ �1 ;5 s` s�.ca �„ `"rr`.-.... r. i1 .�� �� �x!>'i°�;,�'•r ���� i� *.. .-mac..° i_ r ,..• �r,.�c r i r.; ._° � ,J t'�`,_
SS r�' Ism• .c�1 .6. •1:?^.�r.: �" i r . s:-,.. °w vK�.:.i� c'!4t. rt' s .s..b„ - r ry'r cr ♦. �'.' I' '�".v,l r . .. �,,.r , .;F. � f. -. .Aw;

ll
.
1TaL
l�i� P r'
a
at r ..1
,y
�
,W
IL r
t 14
y�f 11
i'• '14W1
J
Ir ak%
j
b
j t CtaL;'s
t:`
414E
r
rK
Y�li Icrq{
e
r
'•iN^Y''C;S 1 L
s f
At.4Llat
Ypq
•�`�H _ `ems*°�_r: ,';1�'t'. 4`.< 'r
W151.41 .: -1— . —'a L' 1 •'' r m '"",^trL „I�-
I�yy � '7 a i IJ;I,. 1
.d�.i'il� •� lifs'i_ .+ rat rw I !'T -ilF. V fti r .- tt s irafT° •i'!"e : }
r r %1'r7. _ d 4,r1 •rr yfo rs� r IF' jl d '`s�{ l 3`I
5 �••' - , a,�'y 1 = .1' °. e iT'ta f r=�+�,"n1 a � 1 c [ .�-iq
`ly{�7�:•+rstwo
f �a - '� 7j�1•, t y 4 •f.
/ f II Sir �IPrta I EiIli.'3 G°' w i
�i'!„I�1�4+4_� y'�IIY}}'t o-Li:'��jlf ���iW� i,`•. s�§�;, �41 �y �' " �•
N:r tfi+�., ik tF. r`a'3•,`�' I S•1 i' , �[ 9?L'.
r{'�I i Zltt,, JI I s'{�' ,, ��e��syary p. `it r.q al..u•' r` f d: « rll asp, 1E' . ��e ` 1 },�' ^,v �`C -•
I{a a ET h' ,Ii .'fit!',° Ry •� A,1. , is '[) .r, h. _, • r�r �y i i''.
'%t,, v :r • *,4V�'frsri•
filer01 i i Irl F A',
�, S" !> I i _., ^ u', , ., 'r• R' y '�`aln i. i! � ' �I �; °. rif. la•F r
g yt{
r F ti a'4rl i vr!'! k4
iup
§!a,
.7,�{c,Iu�Y'�7=^�.,'`'I�4frjl , t T1Yu'xR { !� •} r�� _<�] - ,d :• ,
+ a }�i . �'jk�'I�� 11 t �s + e - � ° w s ` J' . .. . + r• ; � .� F u�t � I � L , K,L j i
�
•�Iix;
1k � r J �°: I���sur }.J , r• x 4 #�`'' fi .1 ° . 't_'
•J'f+S F t '�;� s tl-�- a���yi''. {w -���� ,+jar' � f{. i r Y1�,l�a, d a •
�d! j + - 4 r ,t'• •i. .. � 91 ',w� rt-+� r;
But
e ,;i s; µl, L.x• i -r `i FI ' kt�C�l'..^tea Z �7 r L x'{ r f, -i'" '+ r
Y t. 1"11 rl 1, 4 , rM e1g11. I ,lircq SlCly� +R'<:-'M- <J[�Y,1:vAR.
f° i }Ihy:Jr i, f i",'{` �7tA'" �, .''`1" Y - �'
1s' "t! l tl+s�k rti
t -i !' F ik bl', n E Isi..�"u rye+
.«• I f aytr.�{L'., ' a .'.' _
1 �1 r�t I' I •M. [y-+IS�.�tyt,,:#,, .1'��{•��' '1 s']'r'}s-'_'^ rTgfa tbl� Cr:s
1�� i?�tf ^ '-�,r''F..s.R�"Z,jy%'s - �+ tH A, fi4 �+ •
trL,,%i1 r
�
-sl'i"E -1 ri ri f i. 14 r;:r•rk to .r y F1 7 }, r
� "y V' r ° } k n 1 IS
lot
"� wk L 1 , 4 �, A L 3>aLt� T 3 5 4 L.,gfIY
+1• -f f� 1}' J
•^ 1 �° .'.�; a r '. Ly r•, °'' 1� -I r '' •u "'f�`�� --'L����-�',�.'
�mill
�.}iya
412.
l I
-' �di iI-�• ` �'} � ,��ti5'�I4i{,�7�]j'�� `'+ir� ..r y`R r-t,°f I F
e • y V� r iF f r t Yqq,, 4.. :1'st •F�; ,. f kFn}`^y�W 1 ry f', '`at ,._.�'r[L�,3 ` t'•-. "•;"�. rr.
� I,•J, � fi,r � yt; } r✓r` • � �� •': r 'C `!sr •-� 17-€ b I, i>,.'<+�+' fx�F"' ' may' "d M }, .,' � -�„� R+�•. � i�- .
f a M - �+ r^7JP i` I --'} wi _2-i. r "'5� „� r'•7 yk,
,';• iT r! ° °i �} r<
a I X ,,,0' - r 1 4J - rl 1 a I • h r H !�p �`I t Ce - $; ,. I^ 1s. r s �i 4t'��
y i
i,..yt` a• Ir - ' � +, f, l�l, � 4 s l a :♦ r a. v � IN ''rr �' +�`�; ��
f ,,,rZ k� -r. +� a a ✓ 6 J n t .t °`_ a . I `. .a- 3z^' a ' , IL r •. f )w ",
3..s 5.
�� •� � Y { • -� 3'` ,} rr:. k � t I C FF ��,. 1 ' f •a , �t t i I� , .�a a,�,.
4� r 5 I,-¢. J r 4- � tk � ` � - yr ° Fi ,r '•1 .% �' '
a.
{. - {i li E r '+S '7r { t ii t41 1 ��3 i, `Y all ,IT , l•'� ' r"'f' ! Y,t ` '
t- try Zrt �n .+- *,' r •'. a• + r r
l S
J y dtq L r i y :: + ci_
q °' n ��{' I I r i" ¢ m' ) t
c,.. Y t •.J -r 5 r rl r 7rt:,'"
J1�si til `� t ;fir r I Jr ail F y ' CAr rrr { 4 i t t i 5 lr .i�It
1.3+{ f • . � 'u°�J , � �+ ,� a., ,* � '•• r
�•''} r t'�h r '.�[x. �_+)STi !,- I.n r. + II S. d.- °r° ": �u.,.� Vl�lf+ ?.L 1., ;
F ify '1' l •'ciSie,f ft� cX`,� t , i n :t'-,
rlti rr 'T
1'Y? of rf,� + �. r`y:-+ i � h•° .. V r'�ti:-. Y;, a I+ 7 �a9� #1 { t.r s 1-{'3 -�' '
'. I. } i T .t d 3 } - .x� I + � � ' � � _ +s..r?-:k •' i. 19 +a _ Irk �f . .yr . a e,.
N..P r , t+' -� t+J +• '{s_' •�•• *yT - �: ' : to . ,
^ aa

.7, V.,AI. tj.
j, "n '4�
4 1
Nfq�l,
P" F
'I AL,
"Wi
tt, d{I
qp a�s9rSai t.
;4"rq
tx

1 y
v
Iw , !� r
r r! fl,
"-h
41
E. t'+ ."� s �� yt�'fp7�„ 3,� r," _ ''^ai. - � I q'''•x, ...
1�iP':iy r rrr .r r.. -F.- '`! }' t s ��q �4i};$',IJ� � � 3r F , 11, .i.;,yNy. >i r•1 ww'
.:.�k Ff�', * � I �, !� @t�^r�'a�, uyl~4"�xf^ ' �`'`' - "�" r°�� ��ir�rr �+ �"•.
f.�` ly � �I, H Sy. � I :�.: •) •� � ,VFW
'' � frrr -••sir �� '~>'� y a. .x � �'i
l.. 2
-
'
,'� I l - .r a r'�4 . s4 •s t li
a J
1 I
I' fl
r•Rlr Y Y!. r'f 3 r .. a" r z � 7r � r. t ti, a' 14
v ) t
_'� 4r
e ,!. sl) w s'f,i `, �J '.� ril.. ,• '�}f a i�Sj :, (��}I, � {t Y�a �! I ,.I
R
r,il A I'Wag
4 4 �V !
i 1 I p I E' •_ I � t 1! 4 4 r _ ', y s - 'r , 7' j
11IAt R 11 >! I tl i y {.rt •, r.. t 5�7. { I f Sy�z F- ( - F.I Ir{ i ' y' s ti - ter`, 1,_ q. ` + " ,' 'I
IJ I r II is' ry. fir., i..r -_ �= �/' J } I t. _•,M , !. t � I hs � r 1'ti y n I }
I ` l n ti ., �n 't i•,, "!� ! ..ti`'�,� ` =si 1 s r1 k ((I.{I� r t';:Y tY xµs' :y �:' �:).
J-.iV
1 y J 11_S..rS Yri l Y 1, �l
'I
!J VIM
t
4A.-I r {� �, ! r f
s!I 1._ q�l' S�11ro i -Yr rr � Ilir s4 t l i'3; • 4� ! t ,S Is i I � JI, )lt I,! 4 s tl7f FlkL s Ry ! 4 - '� .
I l,��'tt ' i! Al R;w,IIrol+��r$�lt�,! <f Ir' �' 1'7Jr }�',.r `t�' r..j r,3r�rl*{ LLilt ! tM ro't• �'�tI
.t v as rJl ali+i'K }.� rs 4k.nfw Lµ'iY �'IyLR s• p�•rs 1 t'ti.l r,t +lJl� f+, if,:rY ;� rr �`' �'
!, 11 H,I r Ijl nI ",a
BSI J t rr -. s ;y,w _. '� ya } it '1,. p �i•J', r,'".�i s J il1F'�d,t J I 1 •+4' : 1 7t1 ! it r4 f t h'.IN yi .7. sf '+ �r .
t4.1 eL.4, j. �.
,���{ }-E �M'II � r - .s• �l i li 'f�� ��"��"�ii. �` 4 ��L s 51 �t�,"I'{ 7 4�q;,, i'h } yi i's, 1�,
,1.`�I G• 11r'Iw I +,, ,� J r:. F# a'.1.� !t fJ .$. ;tt r1y
�' J a
I'k 1� + f,r f r� i i {� !-P l It! r r. t. t'r `.�:,,�!, � �`: '' i ptr i � 11 1. 9 I.Ji, I 'I t!ii � _! •.
l IV r � ' xr IIS `.-�I 1 r ill � hl J•r L -�� y ka `. i °j r � +4 ;i r, i y1 :,
Fr-�s s aJ tt;s � lvs�,t t x i.h,.a I;<�`r, s tyt c tlil:J! j' JI I'—'F... t S ltft a' _ ''�..• � � 'e:
IS Ins F s : {{ yl- I i rr Yi .> r.'•� s ,A..
"t:,
I..ri'{i ,- ,3 I J, y a' I litr i u'" i A+ �'o - �.s rs f' i :I ! } r-' t �'•,p, arl- �.
t , � t 'tr r I r -� rw'IL if, t e l a? .•�t -. - J r 't J ! r t t I} - t, r 3 ..
'p'+t1}I 1..1 i.r Rr a, I -,r lllrs u'rF sri. F Mltas'i�4 ;�1•�-3T, ftl s-:1411 ° i41p r,- I J ,G � a•.'^t;.
v,.Y�� �Irw/ .+� tl1r��� tr214i�1r � }4lI� ,1,tCr+�eJk{'s 1r, J ,wF.�,} •id'
'Ably
"i.i 11 I f w gryiA • 4 -Y a Fr P {lire lit{ � Sr � fs I { 4 1 tlo T..1. ,-{- 4l , � � `1slr . { 3 �., y.
h r �
, b"
'1 hw J�r}•i4 � ji r�fl�, m�'dsl ' fJs 4cRi� h: ! Iri 'ttlr °�Frf�IJ4tF rr '1, r:.f' t r � r ,I, L -g
via,Wes, !fyy r,.r ,�r}I'.Y?H ti'a: .n' '!'ti }, i.. i ! .a�ri i.s_.• !: -�.4i,, t_� :i4 it JR Ar..:•. !•. .:e I r-1 .... h.,.rx... �•. , 1

' .` �1 � ,- � I ,, . 99,+' '1 .. . � ,' F • - .{J' , bra' '
SL
"3'�" xrr a ISL .,1,. p •� .r='
t J` � x �r i. � S*yp•.. '.1 ti r+� 1+, i
3� I ,
a,•'< : S a f :, i ='•`-5c •!' � -r t, "1 S-. r � I� r A I r , y• I-,
4'-
'.,a
• +m f ' r s -5 d• ; 1 ,7�,` G . �, r J �JI 1°y � � 5 lY 1 1 ' ^ ; 1
S �"� r 4 1 f r � .) ,L � i _' �'. I. - ti,!. t�l �`.. k-r 1(•
A
14
k ;l aJ I 1I J t , J, Y..� �'c 1- 1,. rF� r ; - r ^a• � * � :d3i};
b!> Is••S �I ' 1 r I4'r Y xl f �T !� ' I r �.,� d� ; p' I %, - '.••r
! �,yjt} +� L✓,�� S j
Tk''rh+,Y Ij x'r r I N
1 .y -.1 jer+' 5 9 1 ,•' i- vrr �� ll'IZ.
,, I , { I X,� a r ��-' �� ..I'"r Y I r 5 4 1 • ; � 1 �,4 _ `� u• { -�+`
Fti •� , r r ,,1 1 i s r � 1 ry
r ! 3 ,' �° r1r.. r ; '' rl! 5. � I � I ' I 'r9',�, Y� 7 ° - � •rX
+4 'I
a.` r+ 1 i• F r -r "` I t + - s I t J !' ,c. S L+
r.�i�y�!
� � "X + r r, r Fps• T\;
ir
Ail�l per, fF a�
`wL9 I I I. t 1 I yA r r ,rrt y i+ t
t S '
O.
:cJ Ijy `I - +.J I t iF- `�; - v `{Yl`. + s S. t. �. •, ai 1 YL sJ.i kr 2 I �I -[ + I ' i
LI I I t S.J C • +-` - 1 Y � 1 ,I tyl jl F +, y�rR � I � ��,
�IztJt ! f,r'.�1c.•. r ,Y4 il`r7 ';! 1 i ` s !` �,
I,iu� ' 11 , 1, I y- c5 r •a i r I c S r I f is I ' � a;-' . 1 F F r. ' �.-.:�
iljl xr a.... S.+ if �'-0• = I +. W
.Ji i t t$XcN. , ._ ? .. �^•, ..,I„iy 1. _ r^�' . ' %',Ja',�.C, ,_?- �. ',' . ,.L.,.,rh �:r4}..�. r1:J �'• .�: F^il .' �:, .. � ..;�J'. .LX

W ox
4 P, 4-
lit
r 4
on 1 -Mum
As
IV A'�'

r . ITT r u`� ,I SJIS - ,_ r',^N�t -[` � +�''i�__' . I J �E J ;a" r y t r _ r� fl f Jal {I} s I �. j •w
r r y, Y• �. 4� L I li4 � F s r I
.,J ,t � r_ '�' .� rr p IrJ 'Y,::� � -•i �.+�'t r:
�s � i '� y � r. rt J�.k. , ..v _ R, .t ►�7 rt�'r.t �y at,.,l, I �,r � I S, r � ..1 i,�: ! �; li7 fir{ ,fi� rr,+'ll:•.~i:
• d� ��..�. ,� rjry r a ,r _r Fi, I ." y? r L �I r�r.'.:�''1'.
,
II
5. .
4s.
rl .�
J i
T f 1 E
s.l -•� IJ., ,- -� I 11 r. �' 14 •fr F '� r � I'SI r {',+ kt J. �JxJ IJ --rif-•, ,., _il ^
�''n y J rr; ' � �kl �� -3,•A , r` l = I r. `� , �. 1 1+ / f":
I r'
S n 4
l �sIV, } _ a I I S^ 1� _yr., I 1• s 1� rl ; s ,•a "°• s-W�•.'!'::�1
• 1
vl r ,rl
Irkl - _ d ra. P'.'t, it - ,`, a r A �<i -sr k y�'•' SI i rl { c yl�. - d' 1' ! r � r rx J h'�d•r,r Y
I 'Sir � sFl P I ° I f - t i S .r r s 4 'M' '. r S' 1, S S a _�.11 ♦fit' r t=..
' ' 4�_ . i } J 1 ShT k? : , ^. rr, I te• E ye'-.` .y:P I"t ,� o t 11 r r. it;,
-!., r401i F• J: k-" :� r 1-
J,y , c- !l, ii"F i f 1 f c 1 I S -:. �� J -� "� : k - -a.J s 'i• � � �� _••���I��t �
� "!- �SiR �x �T 1. r•:
n
.r;+1 r S? - � IN 'i�5 i` 9r�1 ! r J:I � � � I li � u � r r s i '•r 7"1 I a A lar ^P- h l:'�'� - i I 1 J �E 9 , ' l; � S � 'i
-•e �I + rYl,p. 1,•�lA� p`1 ., tt 'l. 3 � e4 J � AI A J drti r 11 �. ( c r L ^Kz� sl r '�'>'S rP ,'I
sJ J 1 w 4ii�i' JI ) J.•,L..ve'...M Ar ,r hl' r E <I Y }
I Y iS
•rvi 1'.,I �s rn_� frpj oi, 1;111 pi 41 �r r,r } � nSWs'�-rf��{ ' '!. Sf.b a�� :�
�a !+ r'I Tg rt J 01 ! r I r•Xf g, � I Jf 4y � �7 i r•,_* t.,,� + :
I =fi t A �r t, i r J' ,y� 1 ti � ,il •rt ; �„ �, � � � r x.
F, F. Cl f'+, 1 r'r' r.t.:J. c..x� .fy!•. 'F...
ty rf• A. ' 7 r L. - L'�i •• r J. .r.ae
,
•� ^ - :r A„ - � i"- ,_� ! 11-. :i, ,;; • ^ :,h. e; r' ,7 P S r r,
� rV• r + ,{*r .,'r� i , �..n• I r..r ,lyt,. �.r � I +� ,
,;r tiL.l ,_�is. h,, d, 1y 5.. 1 �-'3':•� r Se., � r: -i Yry.l A �� a`< r�'��+ 1 �•
;�� rt k� I 1 _ 1a �v •.1 `, �r r ,�tJ `E r.+ I �- i�r,a-
• J '. S ti � , � f � -. r I y.5
I
r. 5-; s r..I } -!„r,J 5tra } irl r+i i� r- r. i {ol',r. aG 3 IJf-
q: :rlk t, T.r
•, y{ rr -4 J• 1
r �1
it a..'
per
_ III s y r ► r. r J - i _ I a .I , � - i f FS-! .
1.y Ir s r5 1{ f S 4 � --,: , � rrJ 3'- IS -µE. {•, s 1 * -_'r
1 ?7 j r -�71 } I rc r Y• S r p Vrt is j. ,�+1•`} i J Y I A '��
YI
-
-pk i -P0 N e•J - r JA. rri 1 at- i T. •�:
Ir ur,
'i 1 i 1 c ,i tt 1 r h# -I. � , t
0.,7 ���s4 1 ! 51 Js it rEl� r' •'rJTP67;1 _ �
a;ll lir} r i , 'e^`J 11ftilf 7}Cr r=,t hoit• v7� r#-�+ I �i4rF iils � ,—, .
.'i-S fl fllI,I �I yl dl 1 i'J4TEP 1 I "'� 1\+ �,i _Li I r �.i '.S' �' ,,,_;.w»»•.r
,
l�� it r w� r' ��;j p"•'il lh � f r AarM kls y I � kr - I' Jy .-il ::
b.!sl r5 r 4}j si�t� Ji J'_ r I
'or A, -e >T� r J K. 1 'J v t, Yr r� r 4 'ij M .a+ i{" r ', �,r.i• !1.'±%'r
.,�l"-' ..� Vwl. �, p �. ,r •' TJ Y z � �.� II � s?i ��A� 1 ;"LL ray. ''r ;, li IJ 61� 4 � r -5 J 16�;f 1i vs -4 f-i1 4 I• 6 N,^'r.�.'S
5 t J�y ,_,1p f y '1• _
y t } Ar"Fy�j �11� i F f J' r s Ij �1 jl 4 1 j4! L i
Y'- ,,. -ill @nr ��,� i Y'i a a _ t ;r I IIri� rl �:. f ,, 55 ,s 1 r A t•;
4 +r .. { h f t• iS -. 13 l i 17 ,, I +
�i{!JI iJr yAr � • r ,r y�4 .� I.lb. f}+�, �. apr.+�f J�� .�}tr y',,'e, -
t l tJ r4.'
"gS 1r r, 1 ••�
r p
✓! Y !� 1' A, c ' ',i r 4 E S
r•rl rt 1 �:-_ pa! �rfr +:, ^, R.� n."! I" I , �y'�° - ,ter
,6 6
v

-
rl�p1�

lot
t+
{ i� s i •� I1 4 tons" � x °� ., 1 c � Aa t � )lli d��� Ey',�y� ' t .y 1, •�Yh a c L
i .s
f rt lk t!7
dt I I f P r 1 t E f P; r 3• 1 yl I r
4 N s
S ,,Lrl _ ill ICI r,F (f .s fr *�. •L4 i�jtryr �„ A;�}ity �l�'��I� :. rFr ��r7 it sv !'.'I.r� i�kk,.
s V.
r �3 L yaJ114 s a1 I 1�1F .r. {w 4I, ji4 '4 1c 7r ! I } t+ Ssl ` is+Ir -° r f a1 atz ,l
�+ .rs �" 1 � I I I a � F ,,4 1• 4' xl r i rr s� I
e
r 1' h �f'�r. t. {all.; 'rl f k Y�wv II _' I ► k df -.YY}r Yf { 5o'z I ,Y� w.'� a llt Irryr r r ^rj4 ',Ifi ,, i..i""'' �1 r4 -t� �'rs�r• - try _I Y
j°'. r
I �`e a r y ! '�•'. a. {�. -1 .A� I�..fy rt1-'I Il�nr�l -y rl
I I L i II" �sr 1 1 yi F,
ohms -JUMP n i,kl
!1?'�}��
!. r 8. rr S. �4 ku � �i!; •4� •}0:' � r �" Yak A,I 'A.,f. ' s
s i
fI *''aAMA
1' {
,,, �, �' 5! 1� 4h' .,Y•`� I� i ri �?7 r r M.� i i iti YG 1 r.,'�t 1pl
r �
�+ '�:`�6r� � t, � r �' a �" G. ',{ � -t r ?'rR �.,r .N
ji
�,ti� `ss H� l�Syl
Mom —
of :.
r r } +
:4 v
:I
xi OWN.
ltin y'. i{,•� M!I� �i.l ) '�' 1;9 '� t� K� :` �; 1
3 rya A r
ttion, an MIT,
S� � ti4f'• r I ~s:tr `� "Y^ � ' �'.$ r^ I .r � iyi„
"`
i' *p F i s+
m� 9, 6 r
+ j i I t eve.'+, I
All
ems• f}C}X HcCµ. ✓I�' f�pF'�-' °ti'r }zxll _ fly i�l�-. .,:s- 1- .�1 7, ru i,'. ICI
�f y{4 5rr r�.F'Rz }-��.li�f !i'.' ;�-�.�' �" r•I, r'' s�l'F,k-f ,s r,�p E;
f �t.'av+�.. 1 c.r,ryy��''�#' „�di li I r Y�y},r � ra S s • r g � �, 'C a II 'r*sy
v efl ..f�.',J .Y; ��'.{.�.. s.S �.1,. , I r ,.,. '.P; 'd�,..1,':.��. '.2.r ., i_e.�1,i's •.5

a

wool
FRO

f1. r S•- � '_ r tr. � �.,4 r J' _ �•.�; _ p �. •� '��" _ r _ - f J-3 S 3.-, i/
f% +�� ra i��nfr i £�..' s:- , r •.. ;� rN�% y,, ._ �r � jJsY �3�- �. { �- f � r,�l .�
i{„I jy }i + •i� - s _ J,t r.'"�C'�L" & c '3•� I ? 1. ",. '] : _ i Z a'-'.z r. -r+.a- t?-J. �'
•{ 1y r i„ yf t• sAy
T+ :{ �• - f. q 4 i-5 •X�!°s'
+r Ji -L It�I _ki I _ -. -.+M�p � _'! ;� - �. Y _r :�,.-. r- � -'� •I ,.,�}_
r i% ��• ,
�,,, ��. y � J ` r . f r , yh�� L�_rs x�� .- i r z • 1 � i 3 -`•+ S 1 ::+ � 16 _�.L v � = .j�'y'
�t�I 7�'s �! ,4,` 3 �' -1F ,[. j 3 ,}-:., r � �� a•; a,f ; � Y .7
�jJ ✓- rr } ` r.F :.r - � - _ �. - { r J � - �r r-'-% L _l. �L `�T q
1 i2x .{' •(I�ri ��� �'! i J 4' � J -rat .� r Lf: ,t ''�c. -;i, � _ 1� v .
a�3 j r r iJ I €�€ r �vi� - Y a ♦ [ 1 .� 2, _ ,7, �.
yrwa r t -, t ,.� - ✓- _ � { Y� ! � i--r �' i � � ' �;,, :.i !t 3�� di
t.`r7f-+f rs ' r• ..i`r} r rz 4F ryi3 r ai { iy s - ,✓}l,:F J rL J~ }�Tt:-'
I t' •. fi F e ;� i) l^: { ,��7 � i fay.!`�iJu �' + _ ,.f j'
t ti r�'-•i.Jprll,?r� E� n yr.. �.
u. t.
�f�+•rr'i f- �7 r. �rJ-' � ti`y� I rJ_". l_ J -". 1 • { i� { .1 .i � r; 3 �'-• 3
-fr{r rf�Ml.' _ '� � ar,- •t-ira � --t' x- u;'s-..` l.;ir 't ,- .�,p• e: 1- i � `_i_
;'=•Y't 'rig 1 -�7.. s4rr c_�r i,:�-5..�;�;' f u3(y "YJ i �3- �'s r
f a ,�S 3i.'' d r��. ;Y �: t .r r s ;, F >,f r i ..=i r e �"•J 1 y �.l3 �rs:�a.' „- J t. } a +_• ct.- -
a
T� = I ,r< d �r � ! - \ �:.'ar t i � f � � v::•+ s s _'- }•..... ��- - ..�:. .r'>;k I ��, , r J' � t �.�� - t -r
7 :.r-,'r�{= � hx i • .t, r� _� _ a e . t f• .. ,{ � - y� Y � :� 1't t - -rr: �/�:
rT �'. h 1�� i•�r T�� s/ i 1 �rJ: ?' -<r . ' - :1'•; s `"4 _� 1- 7 _a4� sr T , >! r.. r '._t-. 1 xN ;T �r.� J.
�f•`. -{ !� JIB __� x :a , S.S � „ y.•s� r .i ,er, r1�. �__� _ • .e„t. "� .$' ,; ;-;Sri. - -
it
i r - •.� _ s - _.:ems 4 ' -a. _ s.• +>, ->' � 3 �% +-^, J� Ili � - T' •J
. � � ' _ ' i 1 � S t � f m r•„� h-.13•}i'a } i a� --. r- � j -� � � _ � F.
-
% r � 'f i '+ i- t- . � +�� � 5�. j ' �� . f � t � •t r ; i� �1 '�• r ���
'1": r - C <. r _ !: - �" �I �+S •I .-,�, ,_. "T� 1 _' r rLr =.`° a ? j � � _r f t ���i^•s
_��f `�i J '�d E. I r 1>V i i. •7� L, ..�+ -F {rY jyi 7• 5 i- �7S_ +�+i' � •iiy -a J
p?� i, �� -_r .I P s d, dy -ri�,� _ i •-�, -�' Sj 3-= � - �.73`;<f._!'�:i s � C,i .•4.
'71
r.J�-y++��,,��' .✓ -3t '.n ;t•F'� 1 { r, `"7•
R,W
J ttt'F'l� 7.-?`•'• " ->r. ` s�, , r ,t y S?ga �;y _ ;4t-,+i
,,7 -tit +='t''�j••77 , t1 .+� i,. _ it i r '�1 , - _ �.yfF 1�• , `d — '-� t t `�i
t,_' .;. :� �Ar ra���t �' "\. }i J7 � � - � � _- -; �i• _.: fy'�7 _.�t wl - �:r. � ; f � ; 4 _ ��� _: _••V' cN
- +s* r�•w °n Lit. l 't r - +
t.'ri t.n A. �3 J• -r'-� :,ice - t� i _ T T .�r
,,,,�.�++� ,i5lr { . i� J - . � ':fir.._ .'r 2 •:, - (4 ya• L C. y_ S-• �, a- ` �.! , �f
ffi ..f•• ,e+ !7/ s�i^•T i4Jr"j4 r :.���.i 4 »�_y: i t ti. j J -.. ., t •L.7 �+ �L r r r t I � 1_ '- ?!• l�•_
�.s-=, 'li S 1...f5ft� :Jd r °)fit• •r4 r < a �'C'� .T �r - _ fps - f,•r r r - fl7 t rj rV: J..
lr F),1},r�r .a.�'�� � f;~ I,�-�3 :e'._ .a .,ems - jj. '+ I r 7 eh- �it.,i -3 LF, tr :� {.J t••f e•sc .f y.�;,.
is a�T���-,rr �•j, �� >>t '.r`";"�jti.. '3'i�'�•�'* 'r t�--.3 v r E T:• +5 -� , -L� ��'t �.;f s-,_ it 1.s �-i3Y ��+�: i;J -. 1
�/r u It ) rt 1,,, ,frJ �.+.li �'� 1•�.� - r i �„ r I � - rl ) V �ii :!! " l~ R _r .r
�f � S 'Ftx .rf 1 t�r <. " 'y` + r' T '" '- -Jt t � � r ?rr � t•.f !•Fw I 4 s s
t .,' bl S ,fit ) I' •s M.w, < r� �i.5 ! lZ.r� i �` , r .i YC�, ..✓�S j' �.
7 *t,rr � - r �`i F r�•'1,i�1 - J'r �3 tl�J! { �� � t�ai;:— � 1�' ����! Pry � ���ccZ a. �, r.% � .•_
�� - "r.) J'.. nj•'7 r'-1..5 �; f 1 '. :+: t'�'.!� rs l"J ' ,r r, _�, `L f' . 'z-1�-.,r k 2k.: ET-•.rR r.7 �,
R psi ks + � � � { f? ~ i �'' t - AX !fif 4 ~ �• - �� •` x'� ra.+'. �--
t� _,•_ ;!� 'FVIJ14Jrrt,.
r Y ( r �. r � S 4 + 't yt 'y. - fG .; • t -mot x - -_... ' • �- LY 4 � - `-a
-
L d ! J r �, J •d1-L :�' 11 K,` ''� N J1y •ie`..i �f' --•r� : C � - T: •� . a
S �`{r} r, ? s S• _ �+ ',r �{,dye � �'l�i `� �-� V} - _ "�i�i�� -��� � e-,.( w
IS S � 1 1'' ;'�'L-. r4� '{l-�� fi. � S�'• �,3 � � •,Y. 5 ��i`af�:r�•- � LL7� �•�
.'�'v. f� k,-s u.+ � , + 1 j � � - � � w., _ ^�,"-s rf', f� i s'" r •1 r �3
"1t.,.Y.i -�, 'Y .:. "_�_'^'_ t� Y• � y Y i�`.er �y fl :/ L ]7 �f+r` - 7",�i'R�+Ar'�i _
� �. �- Y,r irk it. _ � , r tL �'rt � ;�± i-• .l i•r �1,�•`�Q: �Y ;t �S n �,:4 � _ _,, -
t:,
! J •'+• p t� r` � t r i +� r 1 .. �s � �3 _4 TY». 1 { � �s k'+
J _ � F•yyl - r � ' t ' s : _ 'ryt y�, rfylT�i- � �
'-fi+•f r - �.. - t i:_. i J ''.r tt _-�'�y '�1'r tea` - •.it '}i s-j,�I,��r`~tfr-'�u� Sf."� s, dl.�
I'i.: ;�"••`•n

ti
� t'1 '.mot' r r {' y I ri'-�•' A rr%-��'r"wr`j'�'S t.' s, , '}r
� N ° tx... ��4-*r ai tt•'}, rj;- s�•ft, t t-� �jl�r7;;��'.3t j,.lr T�' �,.,,5 �'� ��t`. i, ��r��-fir.., ,,..
� Wsl'�iaf•^'v 1T- - r-1. ls• � �r��t ��.�•�+,�_}�yj eq.' "$ '.
r :� � ..'c f � r, ai-,f> _ A f'L f' i } :�J i:•�f °' �`s .rGt-Yr- rj ° 'G�''',_ -.''�_'_''^^ �� V ' `- S� ,;'� ., `'It
�,�',�is- ' X,',.�r �, (la..r- 1J:.� r,Ak• + � t � .-� _ `•�=i ��,�'�'ki • � �'t"r � [._ _��` rr-:�]• ,a � M"'r ; �� r � .., ^x- `, �'
d? i .K""r^!1 " �� y '� h f tr. J .I r � . � t $' ��"_R�'^sr�.�'+r�•- :snf.- 1 0, ti, Jr F,.�� �. 4'�'. �a�•�-;+�� �. 1 �:
��� k :� •�'+' � 1t:'r'lSf.�,�,r'7 �' 'I j��R �� SS t::`+;, ^'i�ti{ F
i� *` �� �,. I;`9r 11 l i��'1`' if +'�r"�- � 34y„ :1� � f,���* Yf�t-� t' C •� �`+:. �iw. ��t
'iL * 1'atr•-'rirJif�'r"4 .'�"lt "Ji' t 4 c r; r S
° 1 - ":i� �,`a.� rrSt+'{'r' �: -�:`� •fl`.�'r.('•,r �aA ; � � ,,: r- ' r% ,•
{ � �� :.t f�r}!t`°h ✓sue r > f r r x. ds �,.. ••
� 1� 7: v{�,t d'AN�'��P ✓„ry rr ae i,f �Yr, ;"'� dl_ t.
' % l�,rta yr, +'r1J,i3'•rlb r'�'��e+ry; a7�`Y�F�iv .�'�. .�. r J� �►
-:�s� �:�) ' i_rjj f...r•�J�fr{y:�,klr�,;:.7? •Jr ;�;�"n'�r•.
-+� 1` ;wl� ,''j �t�•�'i,�� •i •ni (u I} t��sn>� �� ,� .t{ r 7r�T"� �L1+i �.'� � , r
►? � f M .r,.-,5..'�+'� f y�' � 4� ' 1 y 1 fs1�>P � f ,' �' 1� �5.:- r -
�
„frrrr.
""•.r � +lr�.11 Jar � 1 •# l 1J cr- �i 1 �'`�'
'•�,.'�:� ww..�tit ..(s ^%3«rti �r�"_ '}��i•Ntt . �ni t+S'�f..
_ r:n
ti L i•
"J��e't v-.f�1 � 'A' , �'.~..�.�.�'.'� _ - � ss x r .�� v .�,rg�' �r; Y�'� •
'! ,' �i��,�+ � ! r ! 7 ik" r .r r►':Lr'• -gi' r' it � + ' r 4f', :'3.
N- - rr�_ r+!`Ci'l ��rt�F '�•y��'L�.t �Z+yfE l`i, n���j �t +�'�'�
t.S�v`
Ai
$�r I '1rY�r,►.w.., � ;r 'f+k�ew�` ,r �t�n'�•.�i1� ,4`"'
.3-
h. M.
i4�.l �"� � " � 1. � .tic,/ ' ► � J:,- ' t � .F �'��; M• ,
I
'at'n as � � .r � � r- `'�� . _ w 1• - y� J,�� �a t! r rJFS �L s',Ir�, - +�.�ti l..'-��'� i
fo '.l �� e .+ rr... r' �. '�vj Ifs, �.� i'. � ,i•
s r 5 r'+ a + f A � � � .Yr � .n� yt� •1 . _ i. .r tl � ' j} r i � :`r"
,.�4?;f.9

d ��I r 1' r4 S r I• r:qr r [
ti Jr L I ��i 1
[� r
f,y W
Al T51
49!
P1.6dr' r ar 3i{w{'.r!' �•:,,.4 Tirk :v,r
Da
� ��} i s i.•r J i k .r e � J,f w c.A»I, l i0 ", T-T
'�li-'.�F�"rJ-iT'"�q�
4 J�,�
OPPx�
�xl ti `si=w �r'N r f�k o !.• r s rdF�-a'��'�'FrL k�,� �� '; �_ ,;''
.k�� J 1 + �, n. , r; .:1r T�rj ' -� ! ��,{.;..i r - � fh •i .. y, k;
Fx :llq I 15 fq � .rJ F 4. }q! s ,r e- f R'-fit - d •
I�'
i :?fit_ 4 t \, �t'utt�. 3 •a, �I 1, r - 41 'rr{ , I t, � F,.�, • i,
Al
'•• r . • �. r ,x r _%� -r �: , I � 'i- tip' ! t - j� � T{ � t r , 1r � ,
SM
� ' I
Ij
Il
1.3
I I }JJ r` _t ,ice r rdr f
rI VIt
,I ' r a , 1 r'•+ 4r I, l .EI
r
Yxf.t
r?. ' : t. d nr
rr L T Y i .' ♦ r'!.r t 3- f �!'!-"tw L.+tir
� h1 � �a • ' lrA R d '1a ' 1 `- gn ""'ItF
�• 1 �' c, F.n ,�3� �r I' �t �� r 454 �yi�r��lb � •!� � I ', l{ -� .
5 ;,:� '. � �.`.r f F ' r i x # J •r'^�.r �5i� e a i I -
)IF
rr'r vtl' ' J � i [ f ' flit''✓ !
r; ✓t ,r, isrs Lr IS,P st' .S, iJ1
r, r � •�. t C !A �y t r 3'1. •; y. f � t � ' ' �>♦ i�.f �•
� • 4 Y��, r I:
r,$sly W' J : r�l ItsC r ks 4« F I a s r-i
7 ram. a ' to +,'a'� ' r } jrlsJi•�;
F-•� r i � .P'r •. .. f, dr s F ! Y l r q ' i� $ ".J. •••q ,s rrti f � aF � r� t _ ' "� �'T 1tir�.-�I k�'
J A , . w S 4 • r rf 1 J 3r. k •r" y,•y+n'x_;:
.o- prt>r•MY �l A xr x - i d' . 'ti! �'"T'4 - 5 t c.', ! rd r . w 1 4 +. r
t
� �3 � •'y� 'iSr - �. J �• i F� I.� ?�] ! r 2� � .c,� ti.r-.� s M - a _ +J •ST xi . �� 'q
i•, y,� f^` ¢ y s ' J p a�f xi r r c '� a :y• '. rr '�"'L ^a u� L ..w �� ��=7+1rN / ct fr o
-
f 7 n it 4'1E D - fwa a . �, '";S 1 '.tl, a e � a .a� F •{ ` f .� � � F,4-•�.. ,}- .t��N'�!-5.��a� i ) 't � ! er � s ,
AZ
tit ti - a t _,zs.7...:n'r.u- �Es•�i. T r •r. ° r.

r ! � . f I - 1 sr -✓ { -F;w J^` ds✓aq tL. r- _ 'Yrl i t rr r�" 31 b 1;- � JY ja� Tx !' Y• �;.•.dN
r i at e: 5f 3�,'J{ r , ?rfl,I rt Ta to d' NSF K3?fi ra~Lr �I F:
Ni�iUft' °�.f!".. �7"r .- N . � '. '2.yr s w �+'r.a`I. � P � r '• + �d q rh � .��•H -� - id.L �,, � � c••• : � cY s iv fl '�>aa".'-.it T•s}lifs�3l;ri
'sr.• rr �� r 45 JT' ! }» � 1t' a"� }r'�;-.rr 'sA jr,, y111 ;.Sid rryl 7, �31'}?,�vi ,•!" .i� y.•t� •x
• ., /f { 15�: , o* F.. 6. �} i'I k -�- ,R„ ' rJ.rt,itBl' �'r' C',{ �,�'] ��r- T". �. ?..h.i L� 1 �Al}IS
t'�"r`r}1; k13..'�I gll r•F?k. i�_�a,R, c Fk" !"'t t Ser a
i• Jt k of 'Ys tr I J',� i' { ,�' { t_r rw hr,..,+-4"` L NF`FS� 'wa a r s Pri • 7,
f • 3.- .,Jy �` ,::?r w �'F r ';.E'" d'! ° ., er,E�^v1"`"" 'I �+k �In'a�.,r� �tl1L!�I{i�+� Cq'' 1 - �, � k _�, of '..�
� '✓ n{ s ° J a '"�" ' pp4l!"'� 4 N �.r 1,,,F(ti ig kr. ii i iJWI •{ >,y A ! - �„ `�6'S� �4
• ! J- -- +:: _e T .a r I� u r t �r'i; ""' . °"''• x. ,ti1�A" �•N_ f.,,�-�x; a�d ,.. ' .� L�I i$T'. et'��i� Kh I 1 ��� I'Jt�-��•s c�.� :.i r
' i ' F f ' � �{.�, •�.A.: d,�'.� * s"lmL'��il•d S. r- ,:e k„ ¢• ,l� I E��f..r h 11 ilf�L••+Il+�j � r yw f}t i' t 1 , - 1_
I- �m dl f - IL '� 'yc,l .r3iJ7 i�jr:R5y:'y. � , J t t �". , r�•�.
, t '�_,?;- �r� r t ;4 i� r',`i7�4 (•�,i�^ 1�•i",�•�';, �r �..rr"i�'aek'�C,��,�jl�� i i�y ;�" s� u f,}�� ��N�r.•11 F;'� ,i� � �iS. �. �?'
ii ,t iti rFa ',�'si N! { ('3 Gi rt� r 'Sk ,,r e : dr I r t.,• ^ M
t "-,Trr'�',}.�!' l'I� aii��r.I ftst'S
�JisSa wbt 1.a iq il. f rJl ii;. �Wr`a`.I •x�tt iu'sk X.I I,r.�..' {: , 4a " ,.Lqq. •� t nYlr: ` J
-H� ,, ,,4 iA4, �.• 7t!��;��r�,¢ !�(' II^I
I I.a.,• . k "Jt .rc5` � M' `rv4 1kFi•' ° �u. 'x `S,a'a,,- y .. - S 31" ° I-- " I� �a ti . •-• , �'; t ' 'l 1 ''•, TMi. e? Ls'�__.�_. ti - f
M. •,4' < ''� � ,.a�t q(?` �'� �
ykyY�911�•1r11 _
,1 J'iGp i'it 'S - I ik-r•,I. '3 u..rL�� -Ir .:tk t ww" w-q #'.. 5 , V F k I , r•d - 7` .i y '
d, yU .,rl C�� q�ril � 'o rlCl', � ,,Sr36p'k ,L T •rG i�,RS.r .,5[ �,,L ar=:iT yrrh��y �`p' 3
i�U' Y-i"iwL,r,I�i�tiN�''=i fKllr..: Tr✓il"I?�5fEl dr i ;p�Lr•2tt
i ! .:
1 3+f. 4r n9?lJ ft? I'i _x+•"' ^St- vI J"1 _^v �5: M. 15 l Y
A.wr!{9 1 -- 41t5` + d I jh d"
•1
�{.r uf�•I f'' % a ^' A1: ,,ly �3k4l+°1 h.•rrof,f fi{P!'Y w 1 r `F�� "s L�,'. i'�.' r ", .4 k, i��1 -1'! :r• _
, r.s S¢.;..:;il+t -'11 R -.'t - '"t a. yc , L - t'�7"� {��i ��, f Elf 8w u, � w• '� i r Lr r Y�r {r,
+I. `I uy ,� r 1 (s- alr a ,: c I � •w :i'r ��iu�F't,�: :E'rr 3 • r, ,
I ',�3Je'.11; f �,' i:l*rp '�rtR1-,�`�IS^+rJ` �'e'�, �i- '1 17��;��'larFr�a it t u��k I i.„rY" �'C �. � 7Sr�,, r - `.- � 1 ,.•7rL.l:,.. �,rl t � - d ', - a t - } I, t • lYi ,
r V i k !f A,r;:7'{jr Lv ]'I I u.+il,' if +: - '.iw*tmnSX fl• +_.
,-.-.. S ,�n:.-�3I4. �' '�S fFiI �
y : x � �i; ; } Z�. }„ k•Sf,il
Q V IF i S 4 Y °•r' � r S6 ilf M � ��P i 'iJ i Fi pp Ir �u fl �' V� I� ' !'• `� �Y .e "i V J. t%
i. "I",
I ° `k yew - I fit, �I '�1. *: s� ail r�: ,i°� w �'lI`� r r I� eil 'i '., I"� ' � :r,s''� il-'� i - ys J�; r Y• 'r�b1 .::! d'' r��r 7� i 'lil v-rr�.: I i'� f al.' : 6{ '��r
.:'l�I i�i -
� ��.pa�}1, .0 �}i-�'r",'Adi,;l�"yr _�•,fi �>f �lt,lli'Ipj�,�'g`ii�Ul¢iy } ?}ray r �ii�kj,�✓ .:� ;,;sf. �r!'y�,,� .i�'f 'Yw. 1S'^� i� �F•;r��{,r �f I h i�;}cllL �(i_: 1M.f.....�• 1fl`r•.`-,
�, '�b'I�NY,'y:u..3_ I ,... ,x>rdTi�. i?'`xrtY:yl�:i� i� .�I{T.�.,wif:#?ry^i°;-.'tY�:r:f!'.i.r-�: .�tf,F'���•'s':�.i:r.,�. ira�•5 y'1'e.fr:i.='-r� ��IC ��''fer l`",.f..:l �•a><i�1. tr�.•'...C•� �'_,.j. 1 ,:I., i3.:i
y�. i?•"i " ' �If� ! �' '�li f;���' Vrb.a�4 15� i�
r � 4r. t-. �fx• r fi�
A q°,
-rHrs.'�.Y ri'� rpr au3, p .41.,'°' � 'fit J.t w3����":'°•I
1 �' JlFY Gj CIS Y i; � fi
a `I 47 r_
.- � a i r �7 e� .. I `•f'
n
I• 1� y r f ,1 1
f r
Jj� • �k Jt. �, lJ f r �. C "
S'.
✓� A
ti, �� A � t s7• � �r r '�- fii�p �
y..u`�lti3.
all
'! A if � I j! 1v'4r4:�.•'6Y Y sYl&p .
.t A - • +r �rz
trJ a ,
', r 1 � r - i I•� ,� �, � 4 5
r�+�sM1P4rJAI` M` h
tyn AN, { •£:..�4 .-A'^"- �;d."°' T -�S r aF 4
'r
�Jr�:ul.jft�yrr�1Vi'',F'' .A7.i?,*��'}�R ra'ijtf•F.a,rs
f�1 Ii f ��e%
S ti r -i.r }::{WL' 7k,�tl
k�ift`;�'«•.�9z-�+I�a it 1"} I dtrJy'�Y�?i I r1�a�\,r,p,�7I!€fhr'7k1�rg��j»Es'�� �' ;'�,. •;w{•rry ,V� .�'t^�x''k' ,'k '
r. r a �� INIJif t. � � ',�;F'iF•;..! jf �• "�'i n *r� f k +.' � `- r.
g,•�•z'�'�us'ky>S �a's.'rfr� ���' 1"°�a �:t +j��,d `�'ttr�, s ,, �`k �M c '� �i� <� � 'nr1 � r-G •--'�
!� EEtii �' yr7� �. L�.r- r 1�'l.si �w . ,•r.. i��.r:i4i9� � �r 4�Q �iy1P� ,� F{ c4 � r�h.�r�, r .
kw°`�� t i•L rc L� `J�
,�;:iJL`xG ,w� F; w ir�y I ,y irn f�,r,�� tifii4�lt �1� i � C �j""r+'� r • ,ass Ir ,
� a I a4�f �S1 rya• rxfu,�j r "f Cl
'z•• ." _ �;
,d-. •r ds'''� 1hy� 'J. J },� '}• CtP{'f lea
a' •+e �''€r i17IiAi°€!� •"{# rstinw�ti:rjaF���aTz`y�yi�,°q` �,.^a.,
�i,�'ri Zt 1 ,,��C. i' £• d ap�n^� '�'.
Rol
j},rs `c { Y h,l'' q f-'•.F: "-' .,.
111i t �a fr r" l�•.�h '' 4 �� 4j t l lr l i �� f � 'f� i i t y •it•I
f n 1ja ;�.�%� }91. .-y i Fi�N g'} y- 4r,�,'� , "' s,{ ; t• -,-i y A ' ri , t
i t hrf1r iJys i{:t T';i.PV-illrwNi
lrire` �2',�frn I
!�•.
i �11 '1 b{ �'�r.�• k-Yrr_�I; 'hM1i1„L I a
�(Q,�7,� r `�i�l✓r lily Fy;..k � •t
I.az ft u .r U rIP'nk�.}er Fs fK
r� t�',t4 OiR�R.Ta I
•n �ii �'��� - - w � L r` 1
! 'fir4 1�AA� ? "' 1 ;p� •� r I. ��:
Y t r 6 5[•��,� -�. � + `x j r , I' � r y= ; r1 �t' y f .
th 3� A 71 F �9 •-r 1 iV 1 r: _ Y �,f .Wwd� L.ay, int� -
�•yyyli � � , {h �- ,4 r , rr,. � t+ _ i. a f Y` ! f r7f s F �"� SJ Pr�ra�wk+ .
re ��"� �� � �w `�} Ya ; � � r�j'4�.;.-d shl erM •� r ' ��'�[ rk ( � �a�i*^", �. ',, tr'
i r'i{:��
.if�V". I j'ri � {t�s,r��Fr`�lLA�rr �, a I ° t 1 .tf � ;q , .,.t1i [• 3'.t[S•�.h�l� i,1. •;n'ti
lip"
f' j rr� +
i• .8 -1. �i''�, trTy,i•k� -
-Y-
k#"rtfgi y I y
*a�r. i N f "t`' • ; .;! • - �}:� ���� lS ��Af�� ��� -.,
x. .1 tt r- Ih. } •_ .i
s
� �f 1��4-f S •; i., ! tr • f . nr T � lr-��g� hi ` {,l ;x � ��
jr "�'' d
-
al
r:
•L:. .. r. jj. r
Y #
#' ,� y Y•'b 1. '~' i• _ w
p ��+,••[[Af�� _ �y
G z ij`y.'r� is I� 1,'J .., f •�' K: yeh', .+' I ice.

I—
lijzs" -hN 'I V,; u
(h A.,
P
IT,
41
.,L�r j
u, t
ISO
-OW L

P
n;tirS�� -.. �y�, ' r r ,' •` ; .'i '" .,.t +, , ,. .
` t_ �'x�,�" � � � I �t � r J ::rY`•1. w • � '' .. _ 1.
tr,iq+
L•p� -rl a ,i �vn�r �r�' - _ f; .1. �r• .Vrr �+'� � r• f i ,'�..f�+-
✓r: .r rr + .Yc '•.�ir,• 'del rY rr' r' ry rf/�'+T
• F ,,.. 't^��� ` _ '. t• ,c. t c • ar � �y,�; 5 .s's L'. r `' • , f "' i� ''C�'�
1�� e�'r�r�tr�° � ..
�
..5 r f v - i. r ..e •',r,• - } r �rlCrT NIs `.li r V+•; � '��' W � : ..� r y4Sg�,Yr. +d •' ,, , .. '+�.lt�LL�"1 t � �f+'`', l �
s. M J r Y. y •A�„ � r 1-" i� ,1 1 �h iS`j'• � � �: 1 I51F 1 r - ,;,�.t.
r^'I - }• Y e rF ��.i, ` :. rr 7, 4,i.�'�iip•.-�wl�r,i» tG'1,r��Ytr s rn}J;
• ' � 'A v ` �., � r 4 rA a Sp.,II' b �rnpl J S 7�, 1 - � r yr lr 51 �rt�i�7,.
1W
'J.�....,, y� SiYa 'n �•��1}� '� :- .. a .- - mil- r��qi •, t J� 1'� ,.t' :r
^-•mow � � I �><. � � � g�� .,�.�,.� r stt 1 / i�t
rig ,� , r�
' 4ir ' , IT-p •"i` a�?ik
," 4�,�Jr.. r
ir? 1 'kn `R'F`�-y,;'e A fY •e'{ 3'n ; ` J
r 4'i1E, Sa •� it A.
t"Rlr L-� I:' 'r rF J•.�i 7Y` -i•. r. ,
� t i f' �!•S I, � I.h' n �'aaJr i �+ . '+ f`,�;rr' F�" it f' � ' �.,� �.
�,�.`.� 1 '.I �i IS. Yk .' 15 �- � { I +, � I ,F r'� .t• s �,•.� :�5' - ���
t �'w2 � ,' .t'f fit.• � ,. ?f, �y �,Ati�r�' �.q
M � ��rt V'•1TY t��M
�� • r 1 f i °' ter+.' y—r'���-f. L •'I�rf �'X�r�,�� �
�t'-r� ' J j :k� t'""'° �" 1. �.� ' rF r ' :A�'.. � i5'+ • a i °rr . S , �- i+ a
ye,
..;{ V� - r I..-r r 'I o' ..1, •}: 3 - �
tell
ol
a� ��i6�N�'f r � . `; oaf 1 I•• r r�, i7��.C4Sli pi� `I�
1r
PI. • r" 1' . r ,s rf,�'r tij�'P
I l� ! 'Ytl t, �` I ' ! , , "` r t a + A .rF, i, f 3'P'}•' \ ,";
� I:A �� k• - ' 'fir Ir' " .. ,1 . r S •' 9- j- "`F`�-' y
t y?�A'y� S Y i ,.i , it r r 1 _t,Se�• - � r ') I. �� Y ,
-yr'fyiar FY -r ,1 �' , '., i. S, C. .� •.". i jT� Fz'�y" ��i
��J � '1ry�!�'r' t '' �.r�,1,� r�" •�-5 r 3 y •. r rL• 1 �, h(�a
li}h-1' n P x fitl�' ' 1 � t5 �"� 4 •F� a. A 1 rF'I F �� " -`y •, �� - [ ,•rr } Y ,
`���1 �� 1. ��;,`s•I:;Y ���.. • t, r � r `^' I��Y.r,P n �`��. �4'��'�'^rr''
t i' �" y 4 Y •i I Jar »l �,��
�';' , &i„+' � yr}�'1,�%�"°�'��• .r< ,' ';nr 't r �., � y•+ fit,
:, LI
, . ' . _ � �.,' .:.• r � - � .•� �
' r A #�4�. •�." t�.• � r- ��;, y ail+, 5 �''�r 9..�;5>w '� ~'�y�•.r:£ !� ���gl,
r � .:. �.�, •,. ` -.-fig , I ,q f s - rFyi I a•JY„A >x1�' F 5 � h� Zr 1. s
r � ,,.:�- ' 'a'Lt c ': a 't• �, #Eris s y � ,� ��' " rrr ,rr
gasnr
�
iSaij`7.jel 4` ''� q •iF _ y„ S,� r. r1..s� <, ), 3.-`•�' �3'T s r - yl rl,sl
.l. zt s,y r_p rlv, r -, i• - y T r' y xt t o ir' k r J! •L .err..,
�'` '' S � 4^�`�'f�f%fY3 sriayu�' ..�`�>�.+ '�' ,• -j• s , • . , t r.}.-y�� 1'�i° r t,t.�' T �' �. ka ,caY+: 1 ��- k°->Ti'
r '.. I' 6y�•" -Tye t+ '3� �` iti u}�} A5 Cri S 8
rtt,p�". Y YA ,Lfy � fC, , ,. , SFr' ,='i'Aii. i SY 'r k5F44 •,k �'lky
hI•tV '.rl♦'M r • IrC.i �. N 5 7
�^ lriitL iy r( cFi of tl 7 y rL ' t L r t � Fa} '' kI + 71 F< re' fZ
3 k e� 2 ri i1 k+ h.f -k r r 4f i 5 rw r
�I h t="
e5Ji1,L 1 r ° � tn r7
I1,1{7 .n1 I 1r1 1 4.4 ?� l+ ; r� 19^' FLIriS`, '� • ,�i� IU L.� Si•I 'I
I,d T�;f�1'�J��,�f rIJ� I'i LJls,I
All
� 9 �'
I � I � i L � $y'!r' IA4.
rj'
-�y i I ��rr,n1"Pr;4"{y W I 6k i<r�4 f ^'.li I r, :. ;+• � sr7 �tI LL rSf'i }' �4 j2"
f Ty.ItP, xi lkrta.x�C �pti' f�, fflly�;�-R'
rpn�f i � F } , f ,.r„' � �r'�"✓r"��i t r' 1�.•. s • :' y. •'i
,1, � u, �'4Y3��t r :r «.a'3•' .. .- Tf ��r (iN' •- *t, .
'••'�'' 'r `n; ,Gi2 _ i � � •Lx. ei �'y��:.vy r<+I 7 N;
S •, � �' �i-�: 5' _rr _� .� +a ,.
�
�It.
4',

•'�1, l;yw-s I t _ �,rl is- k � '��'"wrSE:'rx q I(�f:j r�' , ,,+�.::y..� .r , {�t:.-s
'"��e;.-vl ,''i rA fi' p ��r{�•a�,�� '�Nlr"g�gi hrt�{��4 � _ r� �t#� 4'•Ein� �'�+�#,.G�l
Y r 4��"•'..p4k`h� �,.J '�l ,L��f.1= �1".tlt 3�� 1r 7
I * AMN
`41
le�! ,y ��1'11�"7?1J,p r•' �`,�y, 5ty�q��stx�''y��.�
rr..�.`ryt'�,rt�';i�al •1�
'{ Tr ry girt a�1.3 r✓A I' m.�+' rY..' ., r k '}crhl ii br, c
t
Dy
r Ep t ' I ' t,%;;G+ � A•�'` s tr(`s r r `� sl My . r�
'?
r j �..,`�t 1 s, is li• Ji •,,•-,! �;
ir'ra, a �srk r1 '}``^ 'l a �' '# c i'�,h�t � s°.i,� ' 4•rl rlt�+iF
r t.•s L S ti � E� t# a Ir 'S
ate l �, , h �"j � �� � � � r �I !•.
t�M
st�e� t,a °�L "•- Si !' �-
I I � a �� o
tr vP►. C �:>;• -„�� ,{{,tt
'"r' l: L w t ,1
J I it. Y n 74 I s
`+ 1 �l Tait rra�lYl 4r� ! ! rl"t� r rk}JC'f Fir r � ua rr?F
a : , sJ ,�.� sg ,,, � +'� '�+ ! a •� + r . s [ . } , a sa f� I� •Ekr � , I,+� f r�t�
di
�J, .� .,d-. r Itit��ry�"{Yw r�{ ��1: � _h, ri!�a "�•tp,•
-k - �r , I +s •r r s r ++t f{,'srr Q ''� s{ .'- 4 a'' L'R+� '+salt' 4�
s A' r I n d i s• r: L Il �,..T r+I r L� �+at �IY '
er' r � 1 ��t� ` say+`i s s "t' r r. r• ,+ ,r_
r
t. rt ,- eye r t _ ° r g '�, rt`' ;Y• , A'#:
d �t4�r
,i
ar
a 4#r..ro' a&ri. dT t i�uT�V. J��A'ki-'Frh�'ha"r +yft
fli'y �� T I}F�t�yj�L sfRdj�l,;,� �gyfr''+ ��'>.,f"�,' "i-r-+III- d
+pi"�J'
pp�i,�r7��y�'fr"F. ,t:,srC •:� tysK';+-f.•!� �i_+!� i Ik� ?M; H, �"+L;.?1.
1Ik4'7y:F-r 1•�£�W'k(�(tic
�{
E#.
'
f`�
y��i I nyJr,}7'.r'-+pJyj,',*r=�S4Yt`Ir;w3,
r ''LEY.
Ott
�3�1�Y�lrtcr'`Y�f [I�j9?�ryi� '� r •f_ � rrr , 'T.,�ra� !'rs�y'rlp•'.�r'd� �b�;..R�''�yJ�+Ay�a{a�i#���
Yy, Ii" Ars,�� �La''iF r',�r• +t}� J y� TF• �l;"�-tl'Y I'i l[
f` 9N-1 S .,F•a1 r-.r'•Par�x;IL
�'fy#yAMC
•:r.�.y..�kEii" Y�4 t�jr
} ta } r 1
k