450007_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review (:) Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: '7`00M Departure Time: ( 3O County:
Farm Name: 91ma m _ *-es 7xu�Q.t-I Owner Email:
Owner Name: liu14te'l C-0" Phone: 422 - b,BT — 04
Mailing Address: ;
Physical Address: \At -i' rens
Facility Contact: �iC�la Title: Phone: 101&_Dq-6V_6
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
,, -- II 1 = Z$ — 64b -
Certified Operator: �� W ��SdI`� Certification number: --
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes. notify DW R)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes 2R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [] No [DNA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes C& No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters (" Yes ❑ No [:]NA ❑ NE
ofthe State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/412015 Continued
Desegn Current
�Degn
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacrt3 'Pop
VVet Poulin Capacity
Ia(0)
Cattle Ca aeitV Po .
"
L
Wean to Finish
Non -La Ter
airy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
a Design
DTV P,aWtry,,,;;;u;C:�` aeitV
Current
P,o .: ,
Dry Cove
Non -Dai
Farrow to Feeder..
Farrow to Finish
Lavers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
FIBeef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes. notify DW R)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes 2R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [] No [DNA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes C& No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters (" Yes ❑ No [:]NA ❑ NE
ofthe State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
2/412015 Continued

Facili Number: DInspection:
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes
r'01 No
❑ NA
[j NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?(
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ NA
Identifier:
1 S. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): . ]q 11
J
Observed Freeboard (in): ^ 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
M Yes
❑ No
E] NA
❑ NE
(i.e.. large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits. dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
21 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Avolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks. or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
X[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes fA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu. Zn. etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift E] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � C,_0 w0 �� �— e
13. Soil Type(s): +k?N A t0_Q 0 t 1I C . &M A-0 . ��C]0 Q.i.[�?, d `e f OIA CtD Z>V.A�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
r'01 No
❑ NA
[j NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below_
N Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1 S. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
IVI No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below_
N Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
aweather Code
[:]Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield NL120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
O Yes
k No
[:]NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes tgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 214/2013 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0,No [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey F-1 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
p Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
L, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
171 Yes
E:] No
E] NA
❑ NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
5�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
� Yes
❑ No
[:]NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility9 if yes, check the appropriate box below.
171 Yes
E:] No
E] NA
❑ NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Commentsk(refer to question #F): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary
vt
. ptft �S, fF (o f Noun✓ I t 4A
A-06 t,-IoFree,�� ,
3660
L lowex t bs.
i5 �n�d Alawegklev "T bbl' r+ its
> du" � r P.�.i � ([p�S1 �►utr o rM1�t o l`b�e._.)
� }
`'712 0°15 rbIl l
�! ao a• �� C►� 4�
5sl RR s L -m
1 b j Sw , pe- r, -D Daec nte"Tr
G, r� 4,A 3
14
(01101045> scan?
9--7-7 1x11 C,
901
e s P ��ua�nt rra�S,
ReviewerAnspector Name: Ftik IF&4 Phone a'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: V
Page 3 of 3
I 3�f IUaL Aewi S fv {�
lhdta�led1Ve* 1W
Date: �7
2/4/2015
Icv Sfi-at,7�c�Q � .

Division of Water Resource
Facility NumberC-)Division of Soil and Water C enation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: ' 1 Arrival Time: Q� Departure Time: 'eel County: "J(az Bion: &1V611(e
Farm Name: --AAfmi (reS � 11 Owner Email: qa ' jq cb _ cq75
Owner Name: /� 11111 ta� Phone: 5?�_190q 15
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Im ti��� „_ x w Title: �� hiP� Phone: ga -� ' 0I �LI
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Ir WQ„K
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Integrator:
lb
e tifs�� Number: I d D aB 7 a,
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
[Layer I I ___]
Non -La er
Dry roultry
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dai
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: [] Structure ❑ Application Field Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? DQ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) � Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [:] NE
_1
e. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? SM,� �'��►O �j �qk LA�j$�
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ;K Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 1/4/1015 Continued

C N 2450 a
n Cx
��
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: -jL-
14. Do the receiving crops di er from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
(LNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
5Z.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Observed Freeboard (in): yJ _ to
r%A No
tnk
❑ NA
❑ NE
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
S� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
I9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
� No
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addrgssed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
;<No
❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NA
[] NE
the appropriate box.
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
DkNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
Yes
[:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits. dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
1KYes
[:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): VAi/] a l -� 1 JJ t P� � �1 1 I714ele—
13. Soil Type(s): v
n Cx
��
14. Do the receiving crops di er from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
5Z.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
r%A No
tnk
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
[] NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [_] Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check th ap ra ate btASoiIAnay`siWs)Q
g Yes ❑ No
/�D ix�4TWaste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard Waste Anal is ❑ as ransfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [g No
23. 1f selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain minbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes NNo
DNA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of tns ection: C4 126101W 7
MW
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
gLNo
❑ NA [] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA [] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
CK No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
ELNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
KYes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
CommenM(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations:or_ ,any other comments.-
Use draRings0 facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
[ 5M �r�1�ou�UT of 76m mr ws/v
� l
S a�o kptc
� jogl?�t(o
f4, ��Qr �o[sat.p l avea �,
�0 AQ <,-r -4- -(�tq afpW nWa,, pb 16. TRV-- 2- rX�
Zq � G�I� 1 eeo2 s ? R- r+l�e� Accu
3�} 1�lee� - ',�lo� c,�p v�� + d rscasS ►�1�- Can�.�� l a we d
k��� 3rd' �� � O 3 ! o�-
rlrrti t� D -W D Q5 - �g ��' JV 2O.
a
rr �} o $3 Q. %5 _ Zo s . &Ibra-fim. r��5V C;�
QA
0•85 �zf�s D• 9� � Gr�'�(� �P�� D
est Rrr�- P20& f �. � � f QatJ� lti1Q,S�
FV IP
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signa
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ZSiO na
0�719
tore: Date: -
l/41201 S

W
C:
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
0
Facility Number:
450007 Facility Status:
Active permit NCA345007
❑ Denied Access
inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Henderson Region:
Asheville
Date of Visit:
04/25/2017 Entry Time: i O:OD am
Exit Time: 12:01 pm Incident p
Farm Name:
Small Acres Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner.
Michael R Com
Phone:
828-684-0475
Failing Address: 735 Butler Bridge Rd Fletcher NC 28732
Physical Address: 1470 Jeffress Rd Mills River NC 28759
Facility Status: ❑ Campliant Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: latitude: 35'23'50"
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Longitude: 82° 33' 10"
0 Waste Col, Stor, & Treat E Waste Application
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number.
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Com Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector Beverty Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Timothy R Fox
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

• •
Permit: NCA345007 Owner - Facility : Michael R Com Facility Number. 450007
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
#1 A small amount of tomatoes/vegetables was observed in the stream downstream of the facility.
This appeared to have occurred from the leachate control/solids trap area.
#8 No marker observed in the solids pond.
#9 Need to improve solids trap/leachate area.
#21 No analysis for fall application 2016.
#24 No calibration records provided.
#34 Need follow-up visit to discuss non-compliance and meeting permit conditions.
Waste Report 3-Ofr2017
Irrigation N 0.83 0.85-p205
Broadcast N 0.83 0.85-p205
Lagoon liquid
Sample 2
LSD Broadcast N 0.85 P205 0.98
Sample 3
LSD Broadcast N 9.52 P205 12.8
Soils Report
January 12 - 2016
Waste Report
5/482016
LSD N 4.08 P205-5,47 Broadcast
LSD Irrigation
N 4.31 P205 0.30 Ibsl1000 gallons
Need
Calibration records
crop yield records
provide waste analysis within 60 days of application.
IRR2s incorrectly calculated.
page: 2

•
•
Permit: NCA345W7 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number. 450007
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Vaste Pond
LIQUIDS WSP
71.60
25.60
Vaste Pond
SOLIDS WSP
19.50
31.50
page: 3

0 0
Permit: NCA345007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
M
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
Structure
❑
❑
M ❑
Application Field
❑
❑
PAN?
Other
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
waste management or closure plan?
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
M
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
TomatoestvNetabies
M
observed
in stream
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
[]
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le) large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
❑
PAN?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
T Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
M
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
M
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 1OW10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: NCA345007 Owner - Facility : Michael R Com Facility Number.
450007
Inspection Date: 04/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
E ❑
Waste Application
Yes No Na_ No
❑
Crop Type 1
Smarr Grain Cover
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay. Pasture)
Crop Type 3
WIPP?
❑
Crop Type 4
Checklists?
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
[]
Soil Type 1
Maps?
❑
Soil Type 2
Lease Agreements?
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
❑
Soil Type 5
If Other, please specify
Soil Type 6
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ M ❑
[}
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WIPP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
[]
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
111:1
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekty Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
[]
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: NCA345007 Owner - Facility : Michael R Com Facility Number:
450007
Inspection bate: 04/25/17 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
[]
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
[]
List structure(s) and date of First survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 6

- ALT,wAA
NCDENRIL
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Govemor
Mr. Mike Corn
Small Acres Dairy
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Dear Mr. Com:
John E. Skvada, I II
Secretary
December 31, 2014
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Small Acres Dairy —
Facility # 45-7
Haywood County
On December 17, 2014, I conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for the Small Acres Dairy. The records were in good order with the
exception of not having any lease agreements. Signed lease agreements should be acquired
and submitted to this office.
The pump system installed in the drop box at the upper end of the facility near the silage pit
cannot handle Large volumes of water when rain storms occur. Also, debris can get caught in
the pump mechanism causing it to fail.
Currently you are milking 350 cows, but about 410 are in the CAFO contributing to a high
volume of waste.
This office sent you a letter dated December 12, 2014 discussing the high levels of bacteria,
ammonia, nitrates, and phosphorous in samples taken below your dairy. A requirement of
that letter is that you hire an environmental consultant to determine where the contaminants
are originating and a plan of action to rectify the problem..
Thank you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any questions regarding
this inspection or need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact me at (828)
2964500. Please review the Inspection Report for additional comments/observations.
WaW Qm ty Regional operations — Ashevige Regional office
2090 U.S. Highway 74, Swannanoo, Nodh Carolina 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
lnten a hHpllporW.nabwogjAveb1wq
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

0
Si rely,
�' i
Ed Williams
Environmental Senior Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Joseph Hudyncia DSWC. WSRO
Jonathan Wallin— Henderson County Soil and Water Conservation District, 999 High Country Lane
Hendersonville, NC 28792
CAFO Files

i
i Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facii'ity Number.
450007 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
12117/2014 Entry Time: 01:30 pm
Farm Name:
Small Acres Dairy
Owner.
Michael R Com
!!hailing Address:
735 Butler Bridge Rd
Active permit: NCA345007
❑ DeniedAccess
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Henderson Region: Asheville
Exit Tlme: 3:00 pm Incident #
Owner EmaO:
Phone: [phone]
Fletcher NC 26732
Physical Address: 1470 Jeffress Rd Mills River NC 28759
FacUity Status: ❑ Compli,,t ❑ Not Campliartt Iritegrator.
Location of Farm: latitude: 35° 23' 50" Longitude: 82° 33' 10"
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley brew Road ,4 miles south of the Ashew'He Airport.
Question Areas:
Disduge 8 Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, 8 Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number.
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Sita Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone
Pdrnary Inspector. Erd Iia Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
i
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The facility appears -to be well maintained and the records are in good order, with the exception of not having any lease
agreements.
The pump system installed in the drop box at the'upper end of the facility near the silage pit cannot handle large volumes when
rain storms occur. Also, debris can get caught in the pump mechanism causing it to fail.
Currently milking 350 cows, but about 410 are in the CAFO contributing to high volume of waste.
As part of the 2012 settlement agreement, quarterly samples are required to be taken upstream and downstream of the small
tributary draining the farm property. Results from all samples taken since 2012 show very elevated level of bacteria, ammonia,
nitrates, and phosphorous.
page: 1

Permit: NCA345007 Owner - Facility : Michael R Com Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 12117/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Q�aWelk Cow 250 350
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond LIQUIDS WSP 21.60 38.00
Waste Pond SOLIDS WSP 19.50
page: 2

•
Pennif: NCA345007 Owner - Facility : Michael R Com Facility Number. 450007
Inspection Date: 12/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Ka No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[❑
0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Structure
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Application Field
❑
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
Other
❑
waste management or closure plan?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M
❑
[❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
❑ M ❑ ❑
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le,/ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
❑
PAN?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Nq
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs_?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

• .
Permit: NCA345007 Owner - Facility : Michael R Com Facility Number. 450007
Inspection Date: 12/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Crop Type 1
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Crop Type 2
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
Crop Type 3
Design?
❑
Maps?
Crop Type 4
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
Crop Type 5
Stocking?
❑
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: NCA345007 Owner - Facility : Michael R Com Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 12/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No Na
Crop yields?
❑
� ❑
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
❑
❑
Sludge Surrey
❑
22: Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
❑
❑
❑
24_ Did the facility tail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25_ Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
❑
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
❑
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yee No Na ke
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
� ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quaftty concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately_
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31: Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on-site representative?
❑
MCI
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

•
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 450007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW9450007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Hjen on __ Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: GQ 27/2012 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: t 9:30 AM ^ Incident #:
Farm Name. Small Acres Daia Owner Email:
Owner: Michael R Com Phone:
Mailing Address: 735 Butler Bridge Rd ) fetcher_ SIC 28732 _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°23'50" Longitude: 82°33'lV'
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
Dischrge 8 Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number.
Secondary O1C(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael R Com Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector. Edward M Williams
Inspector Signature: —
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Ces-v, c0LX-3
20 (Z - 'L O'' 3�
-IIAz012
Phone:
Date:
m
M
�. 041
tr01
No tj
Page: 1
N - 04SE,

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Cam Facility Number : 450007
Inspection Date: 09/2112012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freelboard Freeboard
Neste Pond LIQUIDS WSP 21.60
Neste Pond SOLIDS WSP 19.50 1111
Z t �2F,t1 A l 0 is r:,..�sa.] N= Q 6-L
o ,•to2
Ls N
,5 Sp N�
S O; ` CZep `i �`l Ila 1 -2-
-2-
0 PA Z0PA
z
Page: 2

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Inspection Date: 09/212012 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 450907
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
12
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
013130
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? S L UR Z —o�
❑
/�
Weekly Freeboard? v
❑
Waste Analysis? ✓
❑
Soil analysis? ✓
❑
❑
Waste Transfers? I
Weather code? J
❑
Rainfall? ✓
❑
Stocking? QL>2Srrr* vu"✓ 2
❑
Crop yields?
11
120 Minute inspections? ✓
❑
Monthly and 1' RainfallInspections
❑
Sludge Survey n I A,
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 000
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ il ❑ ❑ t (� Zit
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ 0100
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ 9 ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 09/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ a ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ® ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional ❑ 0 ❑ []
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? a ❑ ❑ 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
0
0❑DD
❑❑❑D
0000
Page: 6

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number: 450007
Inspection slate: 08121/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0000
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO) 0000
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0000
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
1111110
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
0000
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
0000
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0000
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Corn
Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 09/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 5� tom: n
Crop Type 2—
Crop Type 3
❑
Crop Type 4
❑
Crop Type 5
❑
Crop Type 6
❑
Soil Type 1
❑
Soil Type 2
❑
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andfor land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
11110
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1:
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0110
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 4

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 450407 Facility Status: Active Permit AWC450 07 IJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comnlianae Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine r County: Henderson Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 1 211 6120 10 Entry Time: 11 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Farm Name: Small A=sDjliry
Owner. Michael R -G=
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 735 Butief Bridge Rd Fletcher NC 28732
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm:
Phone: 82MB4-0475
Latitude: 35'23'50" Longitude: 82"33'10"
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
Discharges 8 Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative{s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael R Com Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Michael R Com Phone: 828-&84-0475
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The Small Acres Dairy operated by Michael Com is out of compliance.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Cam Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 12/16/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond
LIQUIDS WSP
21.60
44.00
Waste Pond
SOLIDS WSP
19.50
41.50
Page: 2

3 0 0
Permit AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number. 450007
inspection Date: 12/16/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yea No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 00110
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ■
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? unknown
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage 8, Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ■
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ■
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Page: 4
Permit; AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Facility Number:
450007
Inspection Date: 12/16/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN 7 100/6/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
11000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ In
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Pennit readily available?
■ ❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑
❑
■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

a 0 0
Pennit AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Inspection Date: 12116/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 450407
Reason for Visit, Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Q
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ 000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Q
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis? ■
Crop yields? Q
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues TeS no ^" n
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non -Compliance of the Pennit or CAWMP? 013110
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Q ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC460007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Inspection Date: 12116/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 450007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

R • •
Division of Water Quality
�j Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number, 450007 Facility Status: Active Permit AWC450007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Complianpc Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit. Routine _ _ _ County: Henderson Region: Asheville
Data of Visit: 1211=010 Entry rime:1 j :00 AM _ Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident #:
Fane Name: Small Acxes Dairy _ Owner Email:
Owner. Michael R Com _ Phone: $ZQ&84-0475
Mailing Address: 735 Butter
Physical Address: �^.. ..
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant - Integrator.
Location of Farm: ��� Latitude: 35°23'50" Longitude: &'23 10
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley iV w Ro 4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael R Com Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Michael R Cam Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
, qr-\x /\\,o
'Loo -0q -b�T�
NW
HIT U`S
BTU 1 S
Page: 1

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Cam Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 12/16/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond LIQUIDS WSP 21.60
Ataste Pond SOLIDS WSP 19.50
Page: 2

i •
Permit AWC450007 owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 1211612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0000
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 00011
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
2_ Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operafion? 0000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
131—Doo
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management 0000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
00110
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

P,
Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 12116/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Cl
❑ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ Q
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
O
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
Q ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

V
Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Cam
Facility Number:
450007
Inspection Date- 12/16/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
Yea Na
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-complianoe of the Permit or CAWMP7 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Page: 6
Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Facility Number:
450007
inspection Date: 12/16/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
11000
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
0000
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0000
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 450007 Facility Status: Acft Permit: AWC450007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insl2gction _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Comolaint County: JjjjWersgIi Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 01129/2010 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Small Acres Dgiry Owner Email:
Owner. i Phone: 82&684-0475
Mailing Address: 735 Butler Bridge Rd Fletcher NC 28732
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°23'50" Longitude: 82°33'10"
Al the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
W Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Certified Operator: Michael R Com Operator Certification Number: 20934
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Com Phone:
On-site representative Mike Com Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: —
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary:
The inspection was the result of a complaint phoned into the ARO on 112912010. Wastewater was siphoned from the irrigation pond
via two black plastic pipes onto the irrigation field. The wastewater appeared to be discharging from an old field drain to an unnamed
tributary to the French Broad River.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Faculty Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 01/29/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
aste Pond LIQUIDS WSP 21.60
aste Pond SOLIDS WSP 19.50
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
■
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
■
Application Field
■
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
■
❑
❑
Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■
❑
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
■
1100
discharge?
Page: 2

i 1
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Govemor Director
Aquifer Protection Section
December 30, 2009
Mr. Mike Corn
Small Acres Dairy
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Small Acres Dairy — Facility # 45-7
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Corn:
On December, 2009, 1 conducted a routine compliance inspection of the Small
Acres Dairy. Your record keeping needs improvement. Outlined below are some of the
deficiencies observed in the record keeping.
1. Your waste application records were not complete. Specifically, the SLUR -2 PAN
balances have not been calculated.
2. The crop yields form was not flied out
3. The stocking form was not filled out
4. You need a waste analysis to cover all application events. Waste samples can be
collected 60 days prior to or 60 days after application.
The liquids pond is close to being within storm storage level. There is approximately
10" freeboard before pond overflows spillway. Since more rain is expected, a follow-up
visit will be conducted during the week of January 4, 2009. Whenever the pond goes into
storm storage level (when the level goes above the staff gage marker) this office roust be
notified immediately.
In order to minimize the amount of rainwater entering the liquid storage pond, efforts
should be made such as guttering to divert rainwater away from pond. It is recommended
that you contact the Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District for technical
assistance.
A copy of the inspection report with additional comments is attached for your records and
review. Thank -you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any questions
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION -Asheville Regbnal Off ice (ARO)
2090 U.S. 70 Highway, Swannanoa, NC 28775$211
Phone: [phone] t FAX: [phone] One
Customer Service: 1-877.523-6748
Internet: North Cal Oli na
www.nrwater�uali�.o�
An Equal oppoRugily i Fufflirmalrve Action Empbyer
/Vaturallp,
Dee Freeman
Secretary

or need assistance with required forms/record keeping, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
Cc: Joseph Hudyncia DSWC. WSRO
Jonathan Wallin— District Conservationist, Henderson County Soil and Water Conservation District,
999 High Country Bane Hendersonville, NC 28792
Jeff Young — DSWC, ARO
APS ARO Files

© Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --
Facility Number: 450007 _ Facility States: A iv Permit: AVOC450007 ElDenied Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inggection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: County: Henderson _ Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/29/200 — Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Small &Ms Div Owner Email:
• 11 r1 . - i + it
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 735 Butle[.jarigae Rd - 28732
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: Longitude: A2"33'10"
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View (Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport -
Question Areas:
® Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
N Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Com Phone:
On-site representative Mike Corn Phone:
Primary inspector: Edw-ar 'M Vl illia 's ;', f� Phone:
Inspector Signature: i A' Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Record keeping needs improvement.
21. SLUR -2 forms were not filled out and PAN balances were not claculated.
Needs waste analysis for fall/winter applications
Crop yeilds form was not filled out
Stocking form was not filled out
The liquids pond is dose to being within storm storage level. There are appoximately 10" freeboard before pond overflows spillway.
More rain is expected on 12/30/2009 Follw-up visit is required during the week of 114/2009 to see if pond is within storm storage level.
Efforts should be made to divert rainwater away from tiquids pond through the use of gutters and other methods. Suggest you contact
Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District for technical assistance.
Page, t

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Corn Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 12/2912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
® Cattle - Milk Cow 250 320
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freaboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond LIQUIDS WSP 21.60 24.00
Waste Pond SOLIDS WSP 19.50
Page: 2

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number; 450007
Inspection Date: 12129/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yas No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ®
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ 01111
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ®❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ®
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ®
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ Cl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ®
❑ Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ i
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Q M
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑ ®
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ®
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Facility Number : 450007
Inspection Date: 12129/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine.
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P2O5?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ Q n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
n 03 n n_
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ® n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ n 0 n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ B ❑ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page. 4

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number: 450407
Inspection Date: 12/29/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ■
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after > 'I inch rainfall & monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ■
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ® ❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ® ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ® ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑ a
❑
Other issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those
❑ o ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ® ❑
D
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AVVC450007 Owner- Facility: Michael R Cam
Inspection Date: 1 2/2 912 00 9 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 450007
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
Q■❑❑
■❑❑❑
Page: 6

i� of wA rFq .
`0
Michael
`
O �
Mr. Mike Corn
Small Acres Dairy
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
• Michael R Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Aquifer Protection Section
December 8, 2008
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Small Acres Dairy — Facility # 45-7
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Corn:
Colee . H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
On November 25, 2008, 1 conducted a routine compliance inspection of the Small
Acres Dairy. Although the record keeping system continues to improve, you still have
several issues that need to be addressed.
1- Your waste application records were not complete. Specifically, the IRR -2 and
SLUR -2 PAN balances have not been calculated.
2. A waste level marker should be installed in the solids/slurry pond.
3. Waste application equipment has not been calibrated.
4. You need a waste analysis to cover all application events. Waste samples can be
collected 60 days prior to or 60 days after application.
A small amount of milky colored water was observed in a drainage ditch adjacent to
the calf barn. Although the discharge did not reach surface waters, it should be
investigated and stopped to prevent possible discharge to surface waters.
The improvements that you have made to the spray irrigation field are greatly
appreciated and the field looks the best that it has in a number of years. Thank you for
your efforts.
North Carolina Division of water Quzlity — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet h2o.enr.slate.nc.us
An Equal OppofimitylAffumative Action Employer — 50% Recyded110% Past Consumer Paper
I�7h
Carolina
h[ra!!y
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]

Mr. Corn i •
December 8, 2008
Page Two
A copy of the inspection report with additional comments is attached for your records
and review. Thank -you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any
questions or need assistance with required forms/record keeping, please do not hesitate
to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely, f/
Beverly P ' e
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
Cc: Joseph Hudyncia DSWC. WSRO
Jonathan Wallin— District Conservationist, Henderson County Soil and Water Conservation
District, 999 High Country Lane Hendersonville, NC 28792
Jeff Young — DSWC, ARO
APS ARO Files
A.

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 450007 ^ Facility Status: Active — Permit: AWC450007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComiAence_In5pection _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Henderson Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 11/25/2008 Entry Time:01:00 PM_ ___ Exit Time: 02.30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Small Acres Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Michael R Com _ / Phone:828-6JU-0475
Mailing Address: 735 Butler Bridge Rd Bletchgr NC 28732
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35"23'50" Longitude: §2°33'10"
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
jj Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael R Com
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 20934
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Corn Phone:
On-site representative Mike Corn Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price
Phone: gag_ 191,- 466,
Inspector Signature:` Date: iZ1ook
Secondary Inspector(s):
G
Page: 1

• •
Permit. AWC450007 Owner -Facility: Michael R Com Fatuity Number. 450007
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
1. A small amount of milky colored water was observed in a drainage ditch adjacent to the calf bam. The discharge may be coming
from a broken pipe in the mike parlor. The discharge did not reach surface waters. The source of the discharge should be
investigated and stopped.
8. Wastewater can gravity flow to the liquids pond under current operation. The slurry pond was not originally designed to drain to the
liquids pond. This issue was noted in an NOV issued to the farm in 2007 and a waste level marker should be installed.
19. The COC was not not with the other records. A copy of the COC will be sent to Mr. Corn.
21. PAN balamces have not been calculated. A waste analysis should be collected to cover all waste application events. Crop records
need to be updated.
24. Waste application equipment needs to be calibrated.
The irrigation field has been re -seeded and ponded areas have been filled in_ The debris has been removed from the irrigation field.
The stream adjacent to the irrigation field has been cleaned out and there was no discharge to the stream at the time of inspection.
Page: 2

Permit: AW0450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Corn Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 11125!2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
EW Cattle - Milk Cow 250 330
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
LIQUIDS WSP
21.60
41.00
aste Pond
SOLIDS WSP
18.50
42.00
Page: 3

S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
Permit: AWC45DO07 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 1 112 512 008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
❑
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
■
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
■
❑
❑
Cl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Corn Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 11/2512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit- Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 Fescue (Hay)
CropType 4 Food Crop (Fruits 8
y Vegetables)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Bradson
Soil Type 2
Codorus
Soil Type 3
Hayesville
Soil Type 4
Rosman
Soil Type 5
Fannin
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ® ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components 'of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
'Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
000
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAVVMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates? `
Page: 6

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Cam Facility Number. 450007
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA HE
34. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contacts regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ W ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with onsite representative?
33, hoes facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
I
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ e ❑ ❑
Page: 7

•
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 450007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC450007 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CompliipnInactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rqutine County: HendeMgp Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 1112512008 Entry Time: 01,00 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Fano Name: Small Acres Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Michael R Com
Mailing Address: 735 Butler Bridge Rd Eleloer
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Phone: [phone]
Latitude: 35°23'50" Longitude: 82°33'90"
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Regards and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael R Com Operator Certification Number: 20934
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour gontact name Mike Com Phone:
On-site representative Mike Com Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
►-rnS -` s �r�c�io
fi�1a�
SLS c-ap a
Al d
a r� 'vsc��' L
to
819 Wyk„ mpP-
Wf I-oo'CA
{ Uv b
-
d \_ {tel , f/ -l. X. a id IP.-.,ki;
Page: 1

Permit: AWC450007
Inspection Date: 1 112 512 00 8
Waste Structures
Type
Owner - Facility: Michael R Corn
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 450007
Reason for Visit: Routine
f
(f
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
LIQUIDS WSP
21.60
7 •�
aste Pond
SOLIDS WSP
19.50
f'�iin 33U
Page: 2

• .4
i
Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Corn
Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 5� GO�r/n�^�� u'"1 '0001)
Discharge originated at. i�S,DLct�iO.1 d4&ww7�r�
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 0000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ P ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ k ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ 600
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ moo
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit (Not pplicable to roofed pits, ❑ 000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,�rA V �`�/j i9a� -1-- � or a5 Aw
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ � ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Q ck❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ X ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Cam Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
Q
//
Crop Type 1 Ca' �` S, r�--5 e—
t .`
Crop Type 2 W F
Crop Type 3 T e e. L4,
� S
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Soil Type t
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ty ❑ Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Q ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
�0
❑ !4 ❑ Q
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? cjv, NoT
X [3 ❑ ❑
� � L
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? R
❑ A ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Fadlity: Nfichaet R Corn Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 1112512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑ rae�
Maps? fk ❑ NoV
Other?Q na m H �-�' ❑ u-
21. Does record keeping need improvement? W' , Q� _ Z ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below. aP��
rr
-- Waste Application'6�fL �� 3'1 �' eca� ❑
120 Minute inspections? 3I,� L� ❑
Weather code? D G PA� ❑
Weekly Freeboard? e✓S ` '^� ❑
Transfers? jJ Sir `Y` (p !t� I� ❑
Rainfall? fl F 11 Off. SA
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall &' thly? � O ❑
� phi p� f-� cat��a
Waste Analyses?3x• Sa"���,p �P�/�'
Ah//fes f"
Annual soil analysis ?��3 07 _SAC ,� �� t�6r ❑ GDS � �
L-,> 2 la%' O
Crop yields? Oe-ea -ko -to— eO` ^ ❑
`} qua in
Stocking?d 1� J _ r ( ❑
1
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only). I fAa-`-" ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ fip ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPOES only)? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? !v G �g ❑ 0 ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ✓'� ❑ ❑ Pt ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ 'm ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ $ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑A ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates? C'-�'A
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

•
i
Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number. 450007
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? [ ❑ Q
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on-site representative? Q ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ (0 ❑ ❑
041..
LSD N=,0.35 16 f iooa jAi.
s5b tj= 2.b 16 j+..j
ac c U ,j
Page:
Z
f1
Page: 6

11
o�0� w a r�9p� •
❑ 'C
,, i �t� r,, � ,r� y,�r' Michael F_ Easley, Governor � V jIU Il William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Aquifer Protection Section
June 23, 2008
CERTIFIED MAI! 7002 0460 0001 9899 5091
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Corn
Small Acres Dairy
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Dear Mr. Com,
Coleen 11. Sullins, Director
Division of Water duality
Subject: Complaint Investigation
Animal Waste Handling System
Small Acres Dairy — Facility # 45-7
Henderson County
This letter is to summarize the results of a complaint investigation that I conducted on June 20, 2008.
The investigation was the result of a complaint received by our office alleging inadequate buffers with
regard to land application of animal waste on a field adjacent to River Oak subdivision
The distance I measured from the application area to the closest residence was 70 feet. Your
permit requires you to maintain a 200 foot buffer from the application area to residences. I
would recommend that in the future you put out pin flags to ensure that you do not encroach on
the required buffers due to the close proximity of neighbors.
Please disk in or apply lime to the section of application area that encroached on the residence
as soon as possible.
Please respond within 15 days of the receipt of this letter, outlining the steps you are taking to
correct this problem.
Refer to the attached inspection report (inspection Summary Page 2) for additional comments.
If you have any questions regarding this inspection or need assistance of any kind, please do
not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
cereiy, ,
f �V!f
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
C: Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swarmartoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Suction
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
lntemet: h2o.enr.stale nc.us
lvorthCarolina
AVa&ra!!y
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
An Equal oppoutyfAf umaativve Actino Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper `

• i'
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 450007 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC4500 7 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insaection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Qomolaint _ County: iiitnderson Region. Asheville
Date of Visit: 06na/-2QQ8 Entry Time:01 30 PM. Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Small Acres i Owner Email:
Owner: Michael R Com _ . Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 735 Butler Bridge Rd _ Fletchgr NQ 28732
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant El Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 3523'50"
Longitude: 82°33'10"
At the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
Question Areas:
ii Waste Application
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael R Corn Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Michael R Corn Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
z r
Date: % E
Inspection Summary:
This inspection was conducted as a result of a compliant that manure was spread too close to the complainant's residence. The
distance from the residence to the application area was 70 feet. The permit requires a 200 foot buffer be maintained to residences.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC450007 • Owner : Facility: Michael R Corn Facility Number : 450007
Inspection Date: 0 612 012 00 8 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond LIQUIDS WSP 21.60
F,,Ie Pond SOLIDS WSP 19.50
Page: 2

Permit: AWC450007 Owner - Facility: Michael R Com
Facility Number: 450007
Inspection Date: 0 612 012 0 0 8 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NH
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
■
n
n n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ,
■
n
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Cl
Hydraulic Overload?
Q
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
F1
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
fi
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
rl
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
n
n ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? /
f=i
■
n n
Page: 3

i •
Permit: AWC450007 - Owner } Facility: Michael R Com Facility Number : 450007
Inspection Date: 0612012008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? fl f=I ❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Cl ■ fi fl
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? D ■ f] 0
0
Page: 4
9

USPS - Track & Confirm . Page I of 1
lgaUMT-PSTMES
POSTAL SERVKFe Home I tier I Sign In
7rc$Cno firm FAQs
Track & Confirm
Search Results
Label/Receipt Number: 7002 0460 0001 9899 5091
Status: Notice Lett Track & Confirm
We attempted to deliver your item at 1:54 PM on June 28, 2008 in Enter Label/Receipt Number_
FLETCHER, NC 28732 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or
picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned to
the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please
check again later.
No ification Optiom
Track & Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. Goa
V
map comer sact.Us Forms Go,r't_Se. ices Jobs Privacy Policy Terms of U4e tVatlonal.S_Prermer Aunts
Copyright(D1999-2007 USPS. All Rights Reserved_ No FEAR Act EEO Data FOIA ® ti:, c -.ogt to ri.. ;If
1Sf6rrla�t \4 r1' ?r
http://trkcnfrml.smi.usps.com/PTSIntemetWeb/InterLabellnquiry.do 7/14/2008

f.
0 ..i
State of North Carolina •
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
1 L E
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT ANO NAn-F AL FtEsouRCEs
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 30, 2004
Mr. Mike Corn
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Small Acres Dairy
Facility Number 45-7
Certificate of Coverage
Animal Waste Management
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Corn:
No. AWC450007
System
Attached is the report resulting from the compliance inspection
conducted by Ms. Beverly Price and I on June 29, 2004. We appreciate the
time and effort you are investing in managing animal waste generated at
Small Acres Dairy. We did observe that a liquid level gauge has been
installed in the liquid storage pond. Thanks! You need to sample and
analyze both animal waste applied to the fields and soil taken from
those fields. Additionally you need to maintain waste application
records.
In order to position yourself to pump waste from your ponds I
suggest that you go ahead and fill in the low areas in the spray field
below your animal waste ponds and remove the accumulated debris. I am
telling you the obvious when I suggest that you make arrangements to
make use of land across Jeffress Road as a spray field.
2090 U& Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

June 30, 2004
Mr. Mike Corn
Page 2
If plans for reorganization proceed, your contact after July 3 of
this year, with the Division of Water Quality will be Beverly Price.
Beverly can be reached at the letter head phone number and address.
Sincerely,
Roy M. Davis
Environmental Engineer
SMALL ACRES -04
2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

IType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation 1
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Otter ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 45 7 Date of Visit: 6130RD04 Tirne: 09:30am
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted M Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: JUchacl.A.... ...... ............. . Csl7Ci1 _ ..... ..... ............- ..... Phone No: &�1J�7 .... -- ,.... ...... ._......._.....
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:Phone No: jM8.:AI4=QZ__r.
Onsite Representative:.._._..---_..__.._..._...._.....-----.---------.......�__....._... _...._ .... Integrator: .._._.
Certified Operator:... Wkc.GQ7rm------.-.---........ .................................... ••-............. _..._ Operator Certification Number:..B.ZQ2u--............. .. .
Location of Farce:
t the intersection of Jeffress Road and Valley View Road ,4 miles south of the Asheville Airport.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle EJ Horse Latitttde 35 • F23 50 Longitude 82 0F 33 l0
Discharges & StreamImpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes []No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ----•---- Sniall-•--
Freeboard (inches): 18 24
12/]Z/03
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 5
Continued

Facility Number: 45'7 • Date of Inspection 6/3t7120D4 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®.No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancehmprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
?. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑'Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground []Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Pian (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
3dor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
t 8. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes IN No
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3c7 O
I21I2103 Continued

►' + State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
i
Asheville Regional Office
Alichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W.10mek, P.E., Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Mike Com
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Dear Mr. Com:
i
ATOFMA
• •
V'
AMNON
NCDENR
Won" Gaj;rouNi^ DEpAFn-?- rrr oI-
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 22, 2003
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Small Acres Dairy
Facility Number 45-7
Certificate of Coverage AWC450007
Henderson County
Attached is the report resulting from my December 19, 2003 inspection of the animal waste
management system serving Small Acres Dairy. Both waste ponds had ample freeboard.
Animal waste generated on Small Acres Dairy is being used beneficially as a soil
conditioner/nutrient. I appreciate the effort you are putting into managing your animal waste.
I observed that both animal waste ponds need markers. Let us know whenever you pump the
ponds down sufficiently to allow marker placement and we will assist. Additionally you need to
start maintaining records of waste application and soil and waste analysis. I appreciate your time
last Friday. Have a pleasant Christmas.
cerely,
Roy M. %Ps�
Environmental Engineer
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Type of Visit a Compliance Inspection p Operation Review o Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit o Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Data of Visit: 12/19/2003 1'htle; 1400
pof perationa pBelow"Mreshold
0 Permitted M Certified 13 Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: --------------- •-•-
Farm Name: Small Acres Dairy County: Hendersaa....................................... AR,0 ...........
Owner Name: Michael R. Corn
Mailing Address: :I,35-R11kr.,-H:ddge..Rd..... ......
Facilitv Contact: ..A ike.Corp ...............................
Onsite Representative: ..........................................
Phone No: 828-684-0475
Hetcb er-AC...................... ........ -....................... 28.733 .... -........
Title:.................................................................... Phone No: ..8Z8.6.7.4..M02.......
Integrator:
Certified Operator: i)dike... ................................ -.. Com ......... -....................................... Operator Certification Number: 8.20934........................
Location of Farm:
p Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle p Horse Latitude ©0 ®� ®" Longitude ®s
nig "` _ ,�" Des'- nk
Current Uestgn Currei Design Curren% 3
ga—,
Swine ��oitl _ �� Cat-
:UtCapacityPopr�lattonfiY rfyPopulat�oo Capacaty�Populafio�
Pe;e=rto
ee er p ayer ® airy 250 250 FinishNon-Layer Non -Dairy
L1 F1
arrow to Wean .:
----
13
Farrow to Fee er er Y
p Farrow to Finishotaj Destg Catpcty 250
'-
kh-
ME
NO
13 Gilts
Sp W111 f '� 1 TotaliSs .'... 350,000
Boars _
__.._._...W ..«...-- -,
u su ace rains resent 13 Lagoon rea � pray ie rea
�>yumber of La � © +
Holdmg:Ponds !Sorted Traps �`" o iqut Waste Management ystem.�
a,
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) © Yes p No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ©Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? E3 Yes p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
.L i4jdd-.-.-.....
ler: ...Sq.�1f�S....................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............48 ............... ...............4&. ............... .--..................................-.

.,,Facifity Number: 45_7 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public healtb or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes ® No
E3 Yes N No
E] Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
® Yes p No
E3 Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload p F p Yes N No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWW)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes Ig No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
E3 Yes ®No
N Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ig No
p Yes ® No
p o violations or denciencies were noted during this visit You will receive no turther correspondence about is visit.
�ar�Fquestton:�E%pfa"iuysYES'a andTo .. = acommcadafionsCnany other""'�cammen�s.
rJse.caulm gs of lac °e si natzoIIS. (IIseTSd �a_geSfSS'IIecessary)_ Field Copy [] Final Notes
9) Both animal waste ponds need marker. Marker installation will be difficult and dangerous unless both ponds are almost completely
ptied.
19) Improved record keeping in terms of soil and waste analysis and waste application is required-
.
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Rom" ` vrs S - ... �
�?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z Z

' �IF­1 II lull ��
t � a
/j

L

� A,
I " J
i Zv
RPOOMMOHM
dmmftwm�

Ob
-�- L v
O

! d;

�Z A
\1
­— n
��
mm

mmm�m0plownu

I
A -P
ml
LT
-,I
�1- -010- m

i,�
III
�
I'��
�
II �
��I
'' �
II
I I'�
'�I�
',�II��
�!��
I,
�
,I
�,�i
�'
II'�'l
I'
i,
'�,��
�
I I
�
I'
IIS
IIS
�,I
I
��
I�I,���
III
!,�
�'
�
I�
�I'
I'I,
'I
�
�,
II!'��
',
SII
��i
I!
i;
���� �
II
� ��
� i i
� Iii
� II

.Stat -e of North CarAna
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 22, 2001
Mr. Mike Corn
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 2B732
Dear Mr. Corn:
1I4CDENFk
NORTH CAROLINA DEPAFrrMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAVURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Small Acre Dairy
Facility Number 45-7
Permit Number AWC450007
Henderson County
Attached is the report resulting from my April 17, 2002 inspection
of the animal waste management system serving Small Acres Dairy. You are
doing a fine job of managing the animal waste generated on your farm.
You are keeping the waste out of the streams and making beneficial use of
the waste as a nutrient and soil conditioner.
I appreciate you attempting to remove the groundhogs, which have
gotten into the dikes creating your animal waste lagoons. I may be
worried about nothing but I can't help but visualize a dike failing as a
result of a groundhog burrow reaching from one face to the other.
You are not maintaining waste application records. Neither are you
sampling waste or soil for analysis. Yours would be a perfect animal
waste management program if you were in compliance with the record keeping
requirements of your Certificate of Coverage.
I appreciate you taking the time to accompany me on my inspection.
If you need to talk about any of the issues raised in this letter please
call me at 828-251-6208.
pnScerely,
y avis
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
xc: Bob Carter
Jeff Young

of Visit , p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p
forvsit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other
13 Denied Access
Facility !Number Date of Visit: 41181-2002 'Time: 1 4900
p Not Operwa-MG-n-aT-0 HelowThresho
E Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:. ....................
Farm Name: Small Acres Dairy County: lie:ndersiau.... ................................... ARO............
Owner Name: Small Acres Partnership Phone No: 828-891-1281
Mailing Address: 7.3S.Builzr-Bridge.Road ................................................................... Fletcker.AC .......................................................... 2,8732 ..............
Facility Contact: ...Mille.Cone.....................................................Title:.Manager............................-•------....... Phone No: -1-828-584.:11'x.75.----.............
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:..-Nlft.........................
--....... .. :urn.....
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number -...B20914 .......................
13Swine p Poultry ®Cattle 13Norse Latitude ©. ©� F -N-7-1« Longitude ®• ©� ®ij
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: rl Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 13 Yes 13 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [3 Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...........Solids ........... ..........LWuid ..........
Freeboard(inches): ........... ..... 6. ............... .............._.48. ............ --.................. .................. .................................... .................................... ....................................

IF" cility Number: 43_7 i , Date of iuspcction
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ©yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an p Yes ® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvemeni? p Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintemnce/improvement? 17 Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload p Yes N No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes ®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving -crop need improvement? 0 Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? p Yes ® No
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? p Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) p Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) N Yes p No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? p Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) p Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? p Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ® No
In No violations or deficiencies were noted during this vigit You will receive no further correspondence a ou is vis

05103/0!
Facilq Number. 45_7
0
Mate of Insheclion
Contin I
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 13 Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes p No
4 -
- %rf'��
Y
v3
' _ L w
IM
� 5
,A 43
a-7 tt"3�i
u �
Jz
s y F4
f�
� s

I
71

Facilitt7 Number 45— 7 SPagoon Number L..__ Lagoon Mentifier . S ' s s a Inal 3da
0 Active p Inactive Latitude ®�
Waste Last Added _... — Longitude ® �
Determined by: p Owner ❑ Estimated By Ci✓S or Map? . Cg Map
CPS Elie number:
j1
x
)0 feet p greater than 1000 ft
it
inspection date 10/4/2000
appearance of ® Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
p Lagoon Liquid Clear
p Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 72
Anent condition ,* Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion QBu o Slumping, Seepage, Tle Drains, Etc.
Construction Specification Unknown Dam Appears in Good Condition
constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage p Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
® Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
p No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status p High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
p No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
(@ Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfreld p Yes ® No p Unknown with represmtatire p Yes ® No
unavailable
comments

Facility Number 45— 7 goon Number 1........... Lagoon iWfier ..Sohds..starage.1agoon...7..-.
@Active 0Inactive
WasteLast Added ........... ....................... ... ...................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres): ....0_3.x.....................
Embankment Height (feet):....1.5...................... -.
Latitude FI -1 M
Longitude ®®
By GPS or Map? 10 UVb ® ap
GPS file number:
Distance to Stream: p less than 250 ft p 250 feet - 1000 feet p greater than 1000 ft
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? p Yes @ No
Intervening Stream? p Yes p No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): @ < 5 O 5 - 10 p > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? p Yes @ No O Unknown
Spillway p Yes @ No Adequate Marker @ Yes p No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection crate 10/4/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
p Lagoon Liquid Clear
p Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 72
embankment condition G Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
p Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
@ Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage p Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
@ Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
p No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status p High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
p No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
@ Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact Yes 0 No
and/or Sprayfield p Yes @ No p Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments
V

A T��p Michael F. Easley
O G Governor
v] Sherri Evans -Stanton, Acting Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2001
Mr. Mike Corn
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Subject: Tap Root Dairy Farm #2, LLC
(Formerly Small Acres Dairy)
Facility Number 45-7
Henderson County
Dear Mr_ Corn:
Attached is the report resulting from my January 11, 2001
inspection of the animal waste management system serving Tap
Root Dairy Farm #2. You are doing a good job of managing the -
animal waste generated on your farm. Likewise, I very much
appreciate the fine job you are doing in terms of record
keeping. Like everyone else I am talking to, the unusually
cold winter we are experiencing is causing you all kinds of
problems.
You indicated that some of the fields you apply animal
waste to in the summer do not appear on your Waste Utilization.
Plan. I have spoken to Bob Carter regarding updating your
Plan: He is more than willing to help you but you must request
hzs'assistance. I encourage you to go ahead and take care of
your plan modification before summer. I understand that Waste
Utilization Plans prepared after May of 2001 must be prepared
to meet a different nutrient requirement than your present
Plan. This may be another reason to go ahead immediately with
Plan modification.
I am particularly concerned about the numerous ground hog
burrows we saw on the face of the dike forming your two animal
waste lagoons. Loss of either dike would be devastating to your
dairy not to mention nearby surface waters. You have several
options to removing the ground hogs. This time of year, while
the animals are dormant, about all you can do to remove them
�A
NCDENR
Water Quality Section, 50 Woodfin Place Asheville, NC 28809-2414 Telephone: [phone] Customer Service
Fax: [phone] 80013237748

t ..
Mike Corn
January 16, 2 0 O 1
Page Two
would be to use exhaust gasses from an internal combustion
Engine. Later in the spring when they emerge, you have other
options including live trapping. You need to move immediately
to come up with a plan to remove the animals now or as soon as
they become active in the spring. Ron Lance at the North
Carolina Arboretum is very knowledgeable in these matters and
would be willing to advise you. Ron may be reached at 828-665-
2492_ I encourage you to give Ron a call
According to our records you have not yet paid the annual
fee required to secure renewal of your Operator's Certification.
If you have not already done so, please submit a check in the
amount of $10.0 0 made out to the WPCSOCC to WPCSOCC, 1618 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699--1618. Please show
your Certification Number B 20934 on your check.
I appreciate you taking the time to accompany me on my
inspection_ If you need to talk about any of the issues raised
in this letter please call me at 828-251-6208.
Sincerely,
Roy M. Davis
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
xc : Bob Carter
Jeff Young
SMALLACR.01

I
Type of Visit p Compliance inspection p Operation review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
FFacility Number t)atr of Visit: 1!112001 Tiine: 1000
[0 -Not perationa p Below I hresbold
Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified 17 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: --- • ••
-,N
Farm Name: Tap.Hnax.i?airy Paan.#ZX.form erlySmaliAr=s.Daiq).__. County: Henderson .._. _ __------- ARQ._........
Owner Name ..................... ....-... Small. Arres.P-axtncmWpL..___.._.__.. Phone No: gZ8. fi& :-^4T5.-............... �._.
Facility Contact: Mike.C9rn ._...._ _. _. Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: .731 BntirzBridge.Baad _-- .. .. ..........._..._. _ - Fldchcx . INC
Onsite Representative:. 1K[keCpCq.... _..___..._...... Integrator:
Certified Operator: Alike -Cam ..........................._...............---......_._................ _ Operator Certification Number:R2Q934....__.-.-..__-._
Location of Farm:
E3 Swine p Poultry M Cattle p Horse Latitude ©� ®� ®� Longitude
moo' �r'R �v'�`i ` 5r . 7 CIIr1EO s�`fG eAt ; t$M *CIIQGIIt
�x'�"'�!Lr
-,:c Yvpy&l Ji' �€y> Pau1tL9 ;� Eap8C j1r Popnla tan r �C"apac } ;Popnl$fion
Wean t0 Feeder tisyr, 4 airy251
NX 13 Feederto FMMM Non -Layer 1P Non-vairy
- - L -i'aa w�"'"v^ �; ""N " lr,, c "E'` dyE•x'r �`e rt.•
a Farrow to Wean
Other
r arrow to Feeder
_' "''�O� D� . M.
�. GA s i 250
Farrow to Finish # e a
Gift�j ti E s 4 ni✓�
Boars `.oiS 350,000
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p. Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 "Yes p No.
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/miD?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there -evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes M No

Fri
(Facility Number: 45_7 Dat.e of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ,..Salidsiagt?on.._ ..l.itgtid.Lagoon.....................
Freeboard (inches): 36 25
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11.
Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
N No
12.
Crop type Fescue (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain)
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
® Yes
p No
17.
Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes N No
E:3 On-site p Off-site
Required Records &Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes R No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
N Yes p No
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No

Facility Number: 45_7 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 1/12/2001
30. Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 13 Yes ® No
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
In No vioiations or a ictencies were noted during Ms visit. You will receive no further correspondence about Mis visi
CnHimCaIsf a�refet to'"�?"qu`estian #j: Main aT" YDS nsw�rs�'n�"li for say Amin" mations ar ' nther�'��ummeai5.
NMIa of air - #o heifer sitaa#ions. ( 'omai pug ry p Field Copy p Final Notes
Approximately 20 ground hog burrows were observed on the face of the dike posing a possible threat to the integrity of the dace.
4
16. This farm shares pumping -spray equipment with Taproot Dairy meaning that such equipment is not always available when needed.
Reviewer/Inspector Name °vis
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
R

J
I
i
II j
A-
0 •

jI
',
�
'
I
ili
�
!I
j
�
;
l
II
•
•
-_---
I I
I.
__I
_�
�
�
--I
I

0 It
�I
10
CJI

i i I

o■
i
•

d'
•
State of North Carolina
Department of Enviromment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Hollntan, SewAary
Kerr T. Sevens, Director WATER QUALITY SECTION
Division of Water Quality
October 9, 2000
Mr. Mike Corn
735 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Dear Mr. Corn:
NCDENR
ENVtRONMENr Am> Nm -L RAL RF-scPuRCES
Subject: Tap Root Dairy Farm #2, LLC
(Formerly Small Acres Dairy)
Facility Number 45-7
Henderson County
Attached is the report resulting from my October 4, 2000
inspection of the animal waste management system serving Small
Acres Dairy Farm. You are doing an excellent job of managing
the animal waste generated by the Small Acres herd in such a way
as to prevent animal waste from entering State's surface waters
and to make beneficial use of nutrients. l really appreciate
what you are doing.
You are doing a fine job of record keeping. I noticed that
the fields across Jeffress Road identified as WAR -1, WAR -2, WAR -
3, WAR -4, WAR -5 and WAR -6 and the pasture behind Overlook Farm
do not appear in the Waste Utilization Plan. It would be in
order to seek modification of your approved Waste Utilization
Plan to incorporate these additional fields. Additionally, soil
from the Research Station field and soil from the pasture behind
Overlook farm have not been sampled. Please remember to -record
all forms of nitrogen applied to fields which are approved for
animal waste disposal in your Waste Utilization Plan and not
just nitrogen from animal waste.
59 Woodfn Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX 87S-251-6452
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/I0% post -consumer paper

Mike Corn
October 9, 2000
Page Two
Again, thank you for the job you .are doing managing the
animal waste generated at Small Acres. Please do not hesitate to
call me at 828-251-6208 should you need to discuss these matters.
Sincerely,
Roy M. Davis
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
XC: Bob Carter
Jeff Young
sMALLaCR.00
59 WoodFn Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal. Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

A
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation - --I
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other
p Denied Access
FFacility Number Date of Visit: 10/412000 Time: 1115 Printed on: '10/6420DO
p of Operational p Below res o
0 Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certifled p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: •• - -- - -�
Farm Name: Arses-DaiW......_...-.. County: E1cndersnn--......__­....._._...... ARO---..
Owner Name: ..... __... _. _...... .. _... S1ua Acis Pa�r�e.�rslxip.. _... Phone No:
Facility Contact: .Mike C.atn_ .. _ _ ...Title: ManBge� _ .._.__..._ .. Phone No: .S=At ax.0.......,.,_
Mailing Address:..M1Rntler $age Rand Flgtriepr 11TC. _.----.� .__ _. 28.7-32--­
Onsite
x$.732 __
Onsite Representative: Mike Com.. -...... Integrator:--
.- --------Certified Operator. Mike CornOperator Certification Number. -R20934___
Location of Farm:
p Swine p Poultry ® Cattle p Horse Latitude ©. ®K Longitude ®• ©®�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? © Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) p Yes 17 No
2. 1s there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [] Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
identifier: Solids Std...
.Freeboard (inches):_ --
p Spillway p Yes N No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6

1 i
Facility Number: 45-7 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 10/612000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 13 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ' p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? p Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload 0 Yes M No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes M No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes M No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22- Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
l�.T,. . tioas•ox.d. ...n�ctes.we ..n... d... visit.• ...will....... further.
k6rXeso6ddepee::ibait# this "it' .....:::....::...... .' _ - - ..:::...:: .
p Yes N No
E3 Yes ® No
p Yes M No
E3 Yes ®No
M Yes p No
p Yes M No
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
E3 Yes M No
p Yes M No
p Yes N No
F
'."s. a -:'�- �r44 _ k's.3-_-
y 1 y
. `lS fi �• C 1
pLsa e*J FYL'i i ✓` t' 1 .. s ..Ff [ ` _ , f i 4 '^� } 7. S,yzt`•' sT�.' "dy�5'gR,�se::�.i . r
���
aACw�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Tex �"

{
Facility Namher: 45__7 Date of Inspection Printed on: 10/8/2000
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below . p Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hoursT p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ig No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
LU-
_ -
tKr�°3lY+Et74Yraxv+r�{^p•
I AZ
Mi
�•.
��'. 4 rw �
' t �
� - �c.3ar y � '� _ai
4 a
s7.4,a
+; {'
t���� i'S't3�. f
F
a,. l" 1 w�`c'... •;sFs.
if-
�
!
�
�
•yp�'f� hY.
, �f�•:,� f �KyLe'fi�vc �i.4 ���� Y�'.`r�{��f�'
f-
', '�
s�
�=�
- � � y�Sz� - r x' �. $da i �.�`t
_
_
. r4 .�
�'tiP •� g -
-�_'w+
tiv}
s.rh4.
r'
r9.Y�.M:. "t f'•¢ '.4�•�#y4 3 `t--
b`e�,.��
P.
kS
V i -
: �'S,�.�,_•
ME
� - � �� f'��= '� Lam, t�'t
-r
.{ .
-
PrF��.�d.� s
3 - � rF C �� � •yn`-i`+� `-- ��
s e`x,---•
1 �
1 i; �
dam-
�^.
3t - �1
frv.� _ _ F,� .
L.^�'.y ,�yc—
f#s v{j•�\ is
�jJ.+
F Sy . , -T{ �cf y
)( .�,}�rw( I� t
i,1�"- _ ..
�� .;' i-.+P•4—�.lFY.+'^ �J{k'3t' -" 4
F_
J ••
_ '�:a�.. }• Jr
ti 'y �-
'i ',4 �`
..y -
1 i
- '��..:.., 7a'Y- `i�' ^A4�q f �r 5.'e `^
} E� i 'b�•`�yuL�•a_.-.� 4i' �Y i � " � '� )5iiz� 1 "� \moi
M{
^'. �+TiSi¢-�'a�.Lt�.Ri.^.i �4' 1Y:..`5:,"✓...1
�'
1 -0 -.'.ori w--'s'st ..A i-Ise+}a
-

ctive Lagoon Field Data She—_t
Facility Number: 4.5
Latitade 3 _ . Z3 "
4. Waste Last Added (mm/yv) 10/ 0 0
e Lagoon Numb: L__!
Longitude 8 � . � � / 1 GPS -Map
Xowncr ❑ Estimated /o/00.1
5. Estimate- of lagoon sudarm area (a=s) t7.
6. Effe=ve height of embaxilmient (fest) 1 9
7. Distant;. to Blue Lice or Inte mirtem Stream (feet)
Aeteanined Froin Field Me===nt Mao
S. Dowu Gradient Well
Oo
< ?50 250 - 1044 ❑ > 1000
a.
Is thele a down gmdient well Ion within 250 feet? Xes X - Ra
b. Is as intm-y�g stcesm na locatmd betw=n any pan of the lagoon and the =3rSt well? Yes a
9. Dinaam t4gwamrs or HQW (mi.) U PS -r-VR r� V-- ;to � < 5 05_10
- Att Y`'�
14. Does the represeat=ve icauw t3f overm=ng h7om owside waters? Yes Nv 0 Ungtiawn
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
. Sludge NeseSurface
b. Lagoon Liquid Dade, Dis=ja=d
c- Laggwn Liquid Gear
11 Embaukmcm Condition
a. Poudy Built, Large Tx==, aosion, Barrows, Slumping. Se=age, T11c Drains,
h. Constr=dm SgeciBcndo n Unimowu But Damn APprars in Good C ndidcn
c. Constructed and Maim min to Cuazat MRCS tauaaras
13. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poody M=tamed Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design-
. ?has Drainage Ames W = is sn Lagan gn
c. No Drainage A= or Diversions Welt X=mmed
14. Liner Swus
a. ingb Parandal for Lcaldug, No Limier, Sandy Soil, Foca Ou=ops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, Soil App to Have Low Pmmeability
c. Meet NRCS Liner Rests
15. A"fication Equipment and/or Sprayneld Not Available
16. Contact cmid not be made with on-sim rcprrsentitive
U.FW
M
El
Yes No ❑ Unknown
Yes a

)active Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number: �-f-5 -� In
Z-8g�n Ynmbez:
Latitude � . �' SZD Longitude8z . �' !p ❑ xm�psL'i3S
4. Waste Lasa Added (mmlyy) / a/ o v xovwmer © Es;imated JO PO
5. Estimate of lagoon surface area (a.c:es) 0. 3 co_.
b. Effeczive height of embank nenr (fest) /_5
7. D scan= to Blue Line or Intermittent Stream (felt)
Det==ned r -n= Field Mint ❑ Map
S. Dawn Gr26ent Well
1
< 250 [-1250 - 1000 j] > 1000
a. Is this a down gsdient well lacm!d within 250 feet? Yes -o
h Is an in g stream not locatcd between any pan of the lagoon and the n== weU7 Yes o
4- Distant.,o WS ts.or $QW (moi.) vPSTm iQ ❑> 10
10. Does the revrescntarive know of averrnpning from Outside, waters? Yes Nv [� Unknown
11. Appearan= of Lagoon liquid
a. Sl Near Surf=
Lague Liquid Darlr, Discnlc
c- Lagoon Liquid Cleat
12. Fmbankm= Condition
a. Poorly Built, Lie Tr=, Erosion, Butmws, Slumping, Seepagr,Tdc Drams, etc.
b_ Canstcue:ion Specifi=tion Unimown But Dam Appears in Good C ndihon
c- Carasttucsed and Mamminea to Curt NRf_S Standards
13. outside Drainage :kens
a. Puudy Mainmined Divcnions or Lange Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
b. Has Drainage Area Wigch is A tressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Draina,—_ Axes or Diversions Well i+%ed
14. Liner Status
a. Hi&t Poumda.l for Ling, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock out=ps Present. ac.
b. No Lime+. Sail .a4mears to Have Low PearrAn3ity
c. Mews MRCS Lix= l2equi rsncnts
15. Application Equi == and/or S myneld Not available
16. Contac: could not be made with on-site rcarescnt rive
ULM
U12M 1
■
■
Q
El
Yes No [1 Unknown

.-,_BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
1�
%F
ETIQ
,'`� : A e
.7 vT�
• ,'F 'fY #tW�1
i
t ,.s
• •
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Mr. Mire Corn
Butler Bridge Rd.
Fletcher, North Carolina 26732
Dear Mr. Corn,
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Soil and Water ConseWqtion
November 19, 1999 p
Np�,�
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of
Small Acres Dairy
Facility No. 45-7
Henderson County
On November 16, an Operation Review was conducted of Small Acres Dairy, facility no. 45-7. This
Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all
registered livestock operations during the 1999 calendar year.
During the Review, it was noted that the waste storage pond was within the structural freeboard. Since
1 =` failure to maintain adequate storage and freeboard in waste holding ponds is illegal, your operation
along with supporting documentation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further
investigation and possible enforcement action. G. S. 143-215.1Oh requires me to notify the Division of
�- Water Quality and the owner/operator of this observed violation.
It is imperative that this problem be eliminated immediately. You are strongly encouraged to contact
=`y_R your certified technical specialist for help. You may also want to contact your local Soil and Water
` Conservation District Office since they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or
financial assistance to implement corrective best management practices.
- Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental regulations,
animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection,
x treatment, storage and disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated under the
J responsible charge of a certified operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
- Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 276 if you have any questions, concerns or need
r additional information.
Sincerely,
Rocky D. Durham
Environmental Engineer I
Enclosure
cc: Henderson Soil and Water Conservation District
Roy M. Davis, DWQ Asheville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Piles
919 14ORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, !NORTH CAROLINA 28115
?HONE 704-553-1599 FAX [phone]
AN E4UAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

L/� WUn of -w-atCr Y toD TOps afltrn $ievl r 3 -
'" � 1 •'< - H. ti -.
=rvnn;of �Vaternuseivahonmr� - a
r•"'..k -7`.�.:.
w s.. r-�irvtslon flf �at2t'[�5381tt�' •"p1iaIICeOD°a,r•.` _ �..
r -- " .-x' � � 4•-,.- t. .— n —� 7•.' .�5�-'. Z s}Y' aa. �..� � -� ,• �.+ck�r• 1 `�, a �
ICf'µoII:RiP- .`3.-
iY,�. s—�.s!«..�_.-.:T:r a.c�c�s.x^^—.tip— ss tai�c::z....a,.a•'"? ur`s _ -. r� _. - t
I• Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC rew-iew O Other �
Facility Number 45 7 Date of inspection 11/16/99
Time of Inspection 9:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: �..... ............... J�ku0.StRn __.._..._ ....._........... Phone No: Gfi:B!}. Q1: 8] ..................... -..
Facility' Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 9�Q,��k�.SS.RQ�d _ _. � ..----.... -- —........ EicidS.IYI~....._...................... ...... _.................. Z1732 ...........
Onsite Representative: MUie Cara...........–_. .. Integrator: ...... __...
Certified jl0thW10ja----- ---............................... Operator Certification Number:2135Q.---...--•--._............
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 • 23 SO Lone tude 82 •F 33 10 u
Design -Current
,wme =URPLaclty Population
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Lj Farrow to Feeder
ILI Farrow to Finish I
Design Current Design Current
Poultry -Ca city population Cattle Capaidty Population
❑ Layer I 1® Dairy 250 225
❑ Non -Layer❑ Nan -Dairy
❑ Other
Total 'Design Capacity. : 250
Total. SSLW
Nnniber of:Lago[ins # Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Arms 0 Spray Field Area
001dt40onils l Sohd Traps J 3No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in 9-alimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection. S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Strucntre 6
Identifier: . j;=Q_5tMrL...... _ZunjQ .,pQud.._.-
Freeboard (inches): 4&_ _.. 6_—_--
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
El Yes ®Na
seepage, etc.)
3/23199 Continued on back
Printed on 11117/99

Facilif}' Number: 45-7 Da# Inspection 11/16/99
6. Are there structures on-site which are notoperly addressed and/or managed through a wmanagement or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
N Yes
❑ No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste strictures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required rax inum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
® Yes
❑ No
Waste Anpligntion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type Com (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAVn")?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ Wi3P, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
U. No violations:dr :defieiencies,w&e"noted duHng-this -visit�'You' Wifl receive nq further- ; ;
correspondence abot.ui this_visi.. ; .
4 The runoff WSP needs to be pumped ASAP. Will have to refer facility to DWQ.
7 Need to keep vegetation mowed ( 18"-4" ) for easy visual inspection.
9 The two earth WSP will need a max. liquid marker installed.
10-13 No application records.
19 Need to start keeping application records, waste analysis, and soil samples.
21 Need to send in a operator in charge form for the facility.
Revieweranspector Name s �Dkr 1 fro. „`
RevieweriInspector Signature: Date:
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
on
1W

.� FaaTt Number: 45---7 DaInspection II/I6/99
Odor Issues VO 0
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
F liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
e
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
�3711fii3UW71 � ior' .,.�_�""s"-^�:s e••.-•r�r�.s�...� . r= �;� �.T_y ��'�'t7 wiYc�cc� 1'� „�..�' .` �.�-'rt.��`._ tS= .a- _ ''F- e�L tY..,
26 & 32 are NIA.
Printed on 11/17/99

OF
WDENR
JAMES B, HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
:,f WAYME MGDEVRT,
r y1
" K.RR T STEVENS �y e .
+M1RECTOR;x�,3. �', 'e7.'+•-� �Y
x
• NORTH OROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 6, 1999
Mr. Mike Corn
Small Acres Farm
205 Butler Bridge Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Small Acres Farm
Animal waste Management System
Facility Number 45-7
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Corn:
Attached is the report resulting from my July 22, 1999
inspection of the animal waste management system serving the
Small Acres Farm. I concluded that you are doing a"good job
of managing the animal waste being generated by your dairy.
Beneficial use is being made of the animal waste in that it
is being applied to agricultural land for utilization of the
nutrients.
It was however noted during the inspection that soil
and waste are not being sampled and analyzed and records of
waste application are not being kept. The Waste Utilization
Plan for the Small Acres Farm recommends both the sampling
and analysis of waste and the maintenance of application
records. These activities must be performed if information
is to be available to allow avoiding over application of
animal waste.
I would like for you to go ahead and install liquid
level marker stakes in the two lagoons. Technical
assistance is available to assist you in establishing the
various liquid levels.
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28a01-2414
PHONE [phone]B FAX [phone]
AN ECVAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CDNSVMER PAPER

Mike Corn
August 6, 1999
Page Two
E
I very much appreciate your and Bob Cathey's time on
July 22. Please do not hesitate to call me at 828-251-6208
should you need to discuss matters relating to animal waste
management.
Sincerely,
Roy M. Davis
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
xc : Bob Cathey
SMALLACI.99

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Permitted ! Certified 13 Conditionally Certified p Registered 0 Not Operationa slate Last Operated:
I -arm Name: Small.Arxes.D.ajiry....................................................................................... County: Henderson ARO
Owner Name: Tag.Roat,.LLC......................................................................................... I'Itone No: (838.Q HL -17211..............................
Facility Contact: Mike -.Cam ............................................. ......... Title: Manager ............................................ Phone No: 1-821 891-7.7.2.Q.4Ea.rm)-
Mailing Address: 205.13juttler.-11ridge.Road................................................................ F.letelmr..1VC... _...................... ................... - Z8,732 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Mine.Corxn................................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Mikc.Curu................. .............................................................. Operalor Certification Number:11.209.34............. ...........
Location of Farm:
...................................... t �t..a ..i f Kress;Rear.atnd..Yaticx:Vi�m.ltoa�i;.4.citil_e� �aa1lt..11te.�s�riEailc.Aix��rt:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..... ........................................................................
--- -
7:r
9SI
Latitude �0 ©� ®u
Longitude i�� TJ' °° _ —
_....esrgnt :
Current;--,,- c� Design urrent
Swine Capacity Population Pot �.- .Cl 1 Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
[3 Feeder toFin—Esl-
13
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
13 Gilts
Boars
4� \4�
N,:
..raft Design Capacity. 250
>Tota1;SGW� 350,000
ibsur ace DrEs reser EMgoon Area jr3 Spray Field Aff]
o Liquid Waste Management System
I)ischarp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 13 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Ilow in galhnin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
5lructiire I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure i Structure G
identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... ki0........... .... ................ 7.2. ....... ........ ............. ....... ............. .................................... ..............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3123199
13 Yes ® No
Continued on back

Facility Member: 45-7 • Milow'lu•clitnt
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes M No
Waste Ap;)IIc,Ition
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes M No
11. is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN E3 Yes ® No
12. Crop type Hay Com (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management flan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
E3 Yes M No
E3 Yes ® No
E3 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
M Yes p No
p Yes ® No
E3 Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
E3 Yes M No
p Yes M No
Na. ala'tions•erde5cienicie's'were"no tedduring:ib istiiisit~:lt'ou, iViH-r'eeeiit nafurther",,
rorres06dek a6u( this:visit.':
Comments (tCefer to`questiont#)gEiplaiiu any YaE5 anstvers uuillor anJvrecauiruendations orwayn},other, comment wn t,� ,
tUseidrawings oflfacilttyta�Sette�r=ex�laitr5iluat7ans.: >ase�addrht►nal�pages as necessary) �,, � "'ter ��:'
���
_
_
19:Waste and-soil°samples are not:bemg collected foranalysis App cation`records-are not.being ma,utainedzrl
� � r - *'1�.r'r t"�.�.,r _ ���. r .. -.y Ji♦a" �a � ��. _-. �; '.
3 �'. i:Z{• i 1'"�•f� i � 1i l� ��+���F F� iiri �S, `,-t�{Y�Y#e} 1 � t
., ... - �r=
' S
Reviewer/Inspector Name `Ro M. Davis" 3 { -
a
.
Ikl z" _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date•
.Jl.-, r-

aei ty um er: 45-7 iialeofInspectimi 1 7/22199
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanettt;l_>mporary cover? p Yes p No
.-.--'•--z•.r..•+, fig+--'--'
i::WilI address Vhen- permanant odor. rules are addopted.
71
A
-�,.p
t;,
'} VSEL.
k.�'1 i•'
S
x Y ?`.;.� •- 1
.
tt Rye{_ y •'tip
- ..
r � �.. •`•-�. �
� �"•` ` .
�
{ y
' -i?; � '.1'h `*S 5.
�
'{ 1i<ii �:}� 1ti
i,'• 1
cif �' :f•
rf
h
f �• f i 1 4`, :'
IJ J �{I
i
'J4-
1 .R
...e+�y
-
�I

z-O'Drvision of d'Water,Caaservatton*Upe=anon
-n Ys - 9.
Dii, a on of So d Water Coaservahon - CompLance onU-
:,` on of Wafer Q�esltty -`Complyice inspectZpn ' :h
M' •:yryt .. H y ..�. va . .:4 3"t y
z " Other Agency - Operation Review:-J,
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
I Facility Number I
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 PermittedCCertified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 1 [3 Not Operational j Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.............. ••?1'1 Y`� G. _� ....... %i mCounty: ... L.T�rY�?_�iQ�Si�_.1Y...........................
�1.....
Owner Name: ....�.__........ o �� �. �. Phone No: ....:% _...............
..........................
yam,
Facility Contact: 1...1.1_......... R....--..... -... �,.. �........................... .lx............
Title: R.N Phone No:.J (�
Mailing Address: cxS, �(........ U TSE......? R..(Al.... ......... �5�7..
Onsite Representative: -..!. ! KAE: .0 ?rw VIntegrator:..........-. .....•.........................................
................ ................ ._.......
Certified Operator:.. 4Y ~...-.-..,_............_ ................ Operator Certification Number:..�}.. 0 .
Location of Farm:
....................... ...... ................ ....... _ ............... .......... ......................... ....
Latitude o• 40•: Longitude ' C7= 0==
Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
'Design Current Design Current k Design Citrrent
Capacity Population Poultry ... city Population Cattle Ca aci Po 'tilation .' .
Layer ❑ Dairy
` ❑Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
'
y �= � To>�I Destgu Capacity � Sa
Total SSLW (7
_tuber of Lagoons , , r; Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area j] Spray l+ield Area
Aolduig Ponds I Sohd',Traps No Liquid Waste Management System f
_.,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Cl Yes lvNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [ISpray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system"? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X10
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes (No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4_ is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes XNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
r q.#Freeboard (inches): "_•.-.•
5. Are there any immediate threats te�ro the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes' 0
seepage, etc.) n
3/23/99 Continued on back

P
0
Facility Number: 45- 00uf Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvernent?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ADDlication
JFZA
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ' No
❑ Yes
�NO
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding E] PAN
ElYes No
12. Crop type 9 1 tr 5 it A 10 9 x i45 Ty i2 r.
2 a t7
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes No .
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
XYes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
XYes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes t<No
1.6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes XNO
Required Records & Documents
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes XNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes XNo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, traps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)Y`
es ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
,❑Yes KNO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of errrergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes KNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes b[No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 32�No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes PNo
�. No Vioiatibris'ojr deffjen pibS -werC JhOfgd qloiog this:visitt: • Yoir wiElffeeei.iye iiu i.furthei.r
correspondeuc' e. abo�itL' tl is visit. ............... .::. :
i y ry
Comments (refer to quesiiiin � Explau`s`any YDS answers a dloriany recai lnnendahons oT any other coi tments. s s 3
{+-. r- "'"r --re^ - - r.. ^s-! c - .L. "' Y.
Use,diavvtngs of facility diii tte explain sttuattiions�{use addetional�pages as necessary) i y �vr
Y
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Date:
3123/99

0-

Facility Number: 4f 5 %� I10,f Inspection •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or belowxy
es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28_ Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes XNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes JNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes XNO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? .�f"� '
3123/99

F

I��!
'i���T�
'����I
���
I��
�

it r
44
. . . ............... ............ ........... . ........ .... . .. .... .. ... . . . ....
gs in in n

ii

..
,.
��
h
_--_�__-_-�__w__�.__.___..-.-._�»».. .-..J..�_-_ �. ��.....-��.._..___..-__�........� _
��.
--.-_� _�
. __.,.-
.-.

Na
, I I
�l I

F 4 �
I
I

_ _
_
. ; ♦
__
'
�
_
1 ;
4. -
I ,
....++-tea.
f
h♦-<.-� __
.rte--++_.�^
,. �.
�
'
�^Y�'.`�
—�—
• ' 1
I E
1
3
f
� f
1
ii
1
1

� � 1 � � '
} ' � I i
� , � I I I ,
,1 � i I I � � � i
i � - � I � ±
I � � i
� � � , I t �;
i � I � i i
' ' i I ' } I I � � I
�,
� � � I
i
I � 1
� ; t } � �t i
� y � i � ' � � i ; I ` � I I j 1 s.. � 4
�f i i � i � I � 1 •I i � R I 1
+ ' i i 111
i � � � i
I , I {j;
i i � � � _ � .
{ � i
� i � � � � � S � � � �� � y
a I � < #
II � 1 �
i 4 � I I � F } - J � � ; � 4 i I
, �
i � I � i � , k
i '
1 � I } � � a t i 4 � I � � I
t � � � � � �I � I �
t f � 4 �
i � ` � � I
' �I
� i
� � i� i
i. � I i 4
1 i � i .I i � � ' I � I E � � t t
4
I j �
I ! I � I
� � I � 4 i� �� � i �� i
_.___'.
I I f
I ; I
� I � $
, .__
� i � I � V I i i � � i I � r
i + � I i 4
1 ` - I - � � J i _ � j
I

.0,
OA

i
i
1.
r
T v
"
r
r

'Vte
e F-�

1
� r•
L
<
i
� i
'.
4.
�
r
•
�
. --�
�3`
r
i
�
•;
t'
.�
j
•��
� i
'
�. '
�
�,
_
•
�
�'
�
.+
�
r
�
t.
�
�
.�
s
r.
r`
i
�
i
i
-
'f
�
s
�
4
is
'
`«
,.
��
1
4
i
r

t
ams%« NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 24, 1998
Mr. William Johnston
Small Acres Dairy
470 Jeffress Road
Fletcher, North Carolina 28732
Subject;., Compliance Inspection
Small Acres Dairy
Facility Number 45-7
: Henderson County
Dear Mr. Johnston:
Those of you who often have lunch at the Mills River
Restaurant will soon figure out that you have gotten similar
letters so I will go ahead and tell you that I am sending
identical letters to the owners of Tap Root, R&B, Small
Acres, Fullam and Carland Dairies. All of you are doing a
good job of managing the animal waste being generated on
your farms. You have built good systems capable of keeping
animal waste out of streams on your property; you are making
beneficial use of the water and nutrients resulting from
operation of your systems; and the land receiving
water/nutrients is being managed in such a way that it will
continue to serve over the long term.
Given that I have just inspected the animal waste
management system on your farm I will probably not be back
on your place for a few months unless I receive a call from
you or am just in the area. There are a few things that I
would like to encourage all of you to do in preparation for
my next visit. Have a copy of your Waste Utilization Plan
available, know the certification number of your Certified
Operator, test your soil and waste in accordance with your
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and have the results
of those analyses available.
I know how you guys hate messing with paper but you
have done all the hard work, so all I am asking you to do is
tie up a few loose ends. Some of you have done some testing
of your animal waste and soil. If you are not testing the
soil and animal waste in accordance with your Waste
Utilization Plan, you do not know whether you are applying
too much, too little or just the right amount of nutrients.
Principles of good fiscal management make it necessary for
you to do this testing in order to optimize crop production
on the one hand and on the other to insure that you are not
INTERCHANGE BUILDINO, ES WOOa FIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28601-2414
PONE 928-251-6209 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPO"I p4gTY/AFFIRMATIV; ACTION EMPLOYER - 509E RECTCLED/10% POST-CONiUMER PAP[R

c-
William Johnston
November 24, 1998
Page Two
wasting nutrients through application in excess of crop
needs. If you make it a practice to apply commercial
fertilizers on the same land which receives your animal
waste, then it becomes doubly necessary that you test both
soil and animal waste to insure that you are not buying
unnecessary nutrients. Lastly, if you are applying
nutrients in excess of crop needs then you could be
contaminating groundwater with those nutrients applied in
excess. Nitrates would be the nutrient of primary concern
in this instance.
Attached is a copy of the report resulting from my
recent inspection. I appreciate your time and I enjoyed
meeting all of you. If you need to discuss any facet of
your animal waste management program I encourage you to call
me at 828 -251 -6208 -
Sincerely,
1
Roy M. avis
Environmental Engineer
Enclosure
TAPROOTL.98

Division of hod and Wr Louservation - Uperation Keviewv
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
9 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
:. p :: p O 0 ....
.... . ...... . ..... . __ . s :aii.' :; ; 1,3; . .. , ® 24 hr. (hh-mm)
■ Registered >D Certified a Applied for Permit p Permitted 113
Henderson ARO
...: William
eft ad litchi 732
Mikr.C,ttnu....._....._...-........................---................................... NLA..---- ......................... ..... ---� - -
Willia54l...-..... —---ohptQ?1..- ........................ ..................
s a atu17 T1 Z s e w'
35
pestgn Current Design current- , I "qM - vrren
Swine - „ ;Capacity Popttlation Poultry Capacity Population - Cattle Capacity. Population -
p V�ean to I eeiier
: % Yes
"p 1' iffier iU 1�'
Discharge originated at: - Lagoon _ Spray Field _ Other
ip l•arrow%toWean
E_Farrow to Fier
10F�srro� who x n�isli
:_. Yes
o ME ._
b. If discharue is obserk-,A, did it re.Ech Surlite4 % aicr'. (t]'% es. noflf Dk `)
- Yes
No
5
-.0 Non=Laye:p-NonZ7airy
C111L =
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW 350,0
- Numbei of Lagoons IHolding Ponds GSubsurface rains Present coon a S pray ie
'• eM - . p o tyur Waste Management vstem
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? : Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
: % Yes
No
Discharge originated at: - Lagoon _ Spray Field _ Other
a. If discharee is observed. n as die con eN ance man-made"
:_. Yes
:_ No
b. If discharue is obserk-,A, did it re.Ech Surlite4 % aicr'. (t]'% es. noflf Dk `)
- Yes
No
c. If disclian_,e i; ohscn.:d. \►hat is the cstimnat.d 1101% in sal.'ujin:
d. Does dischar-,c bN pass a lagoon s� Ntem:' (I1-noli1% I AVQ)
Yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes
No
5. Does anv part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
: _. Yes
: _ No
maintenance/improvemenO
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'-'
Yes
No
7/2/97
Continued on buck
n

13. Crop type
13: I did not see staff gauges in either lagoon. i imagine both lagoons will be equiped with staff gauges prior to rcatioa.
Are there lagopns or slorage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Yes No
Structures (Ugoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits etc.
No
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Yes .-..No
_.....-.Qlcl...--..._.. ........... ._............................................•---.._.........._.._......_..........
�._. ._ —.... _. -
:. .....ft ................ ]5...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Yes .._ No
12. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes .. , No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Yes
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
21. Did Reviewer/luspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes No
Waste Application
Yes
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
Yes No
(If in excess of WMT, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
13. Crop type
13: I did not see staff gauges in either lagoon. i imagine both lagoons will be equiped with staff gauges prior to rcatioa.
�
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMI)?
-Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
_ Yes
- No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Yes
; No
20. Dotes facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
; ; No
21. Did Reviewer/luspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
--- Yes
r, No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
._ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniv
23- Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
:. No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AV^P?
Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Yes
No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit
Comments (refer to. question #) Explain anyWES4answers-and/or any recommendations or any other comments. _. 4
' ,to.. •Yk� Y11 s : r ;r. S ,.gam•'..
IIse drawings of fan7ity to better ezglam srtoations. (flee additional pages as necessary) a i �"i'a
^ %'r t".'ir..,t� "i; r� "r �' = x a• w , t tf�ti, r z. its
13: I did not see staff gauges in either lagoon. i imagine both lagoons will be equiped with staff gauges prior to rcatioa.
�
Reviewer/Inspector Name Roy M. Davis
Reviewer/lnspector Signature:
Date: ,9

9 ime of Instivetion ® 24 ha (hh:mm)
Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted p '.: —
SmallAcrrsDairy..............................._........_................................_........... Henderson ARO
W�Ujagt J0h9l£4.QR?�d............................................................ '.. .;:. .. $ $r.$9A.:. $................................... .......................
:: ,:.tr- kY.illiam.iBiUJ.)dQhnston........................................................................................... .181.8-841:]1H1(H).._........
a: ;7o_JgfL 9.hoa9.................... _.......................................................... ._..—................................................. MR ......... ...
INIILt_-
.CUM.
I1IlA........_........._...........................-.—.......
----
Willi?n4................................. jQ.kt?t:o.9........ .................................. -..213.�.............................
Design urren
. .;
1jesign urren - -
igniarreQ
..
`Somme -Capacity - Population:
Pouhry:
Capaeity Population - r Cattle . ; + Ca ptta:4,µ Popaliitton
'{❑ Wean to Feed'ei
#❑ Layer- •-
- —
llatr250
245
;';®
Non-Da'vy
l''ffiroW to Wean-
- _---• ---v
piairow to Feeder
❑ Other
I"
w to 1:inish�
❑❑
To tal Design Capacitg
250
Gilg
" � ❑ boars
Total SSLW :,350,000
Namber�ofLagoons 1 Holdutg ❑ Ponds `Subsurface
', ❑ o
rai IN Lagoon Area
qm ase anagemen System
IN Npray Neld Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. & any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: Lagoon Spray Field Otho
a. If discharge is observed. was the com`eN-ance man-made?
b- If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (fl'yes. notif}° DWQ)
c. If discharge is obset- ed, what is the estimated flog in gal/min'!
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenanceltmprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback- criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
725/97
Yes No
Yes No
Yes 7 No
Yes No
Yes ; . No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
_,Yes No
Yes ... No
Continued on back

tem r. 45-7 1 Daiv 00lection
Yes
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
` Yes .-.,-.No
Structures_(WoonsMolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
_ No
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Yes .., No
............... Old .............. ............. Nfw........ ..... ................................... .................................... ....................................
....................... .............
...............................1 ............... .................................... .............. .................. _ .. ..............._
_. .w.._� _....._
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Yes No
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures obsen ed?
Yes - No
12. Do any of the structures need maimenance/rmprovement?
:. Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes No
Waste Application
Yes
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
Ycs No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
No
15. Crop type .................................................... ...... .............. .....................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Pian (AWW)?
_ Yes : No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
_ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Yes
No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
No
21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
Yes
No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities On1v
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Yes
No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
see stagy gauges in enner Lagoon. i tmagme
gauges
.Ve
Reviewerllnspector Name Roy M. Davis J
Reviewer/Iaspector Signature: Date: 5 (5

'a
Mmm

L 0 Division of SOEOW Water Conservation [3Other - cy R r f
-�Rivision of Water Quality
Routine
Follow-uD of
I Facility Number Q 1
Follow• -u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection /O O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
XRegistered j3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit Permitted [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ...... _.....
_•-•-___•_
Farm Name: SrrN A L R
fV%..0-R C`'S Counts:---�-•� .!'V� E �S-a y- ...............
mY int Cf O.>� N s Tvnr
tv
Owner Name:... 4-7.9— 17� ... �5�1.' C.r.!`�.1!! Phone No:.....- . $... 1 J'................
--.
Facility Contact:--- -_----- - _---- Title:..,,..-............ ._ Phone No:
. ......... —............._........... _........................ 6 fir' b !tS
c'7
241ailingAddress: ..........�.._...........
�.�.F.....R.............�.--�---'1;_...._�...,......-•---�.._---•----....�.........................,1...•.....��....:�t...._..........`.'..�.
Onsite Representative:_ P � 1---}...1'.1�. C ...... �.l�.T`�!........ -- .... ._....... .�.._-..... Integrator:._...._ .......
Certified Operator•.__.( t L �. Y Q �(+V S, a .... Operator Certification Number-___
l ocation of Farm: d l F r—Q SSS �s
Latitude Longitude �• �' �_'
Design Current:Design Current
Design Current=
::,Swore , : "Capacity ,Population Poultry ,s:... `Capacity Population Cattle w.
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder I0 Layer airy
r
❑ Feeder to Finish❑ Non -Layer ❑ n-Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other- ,
--
❑ Farrow to Finish ; . _ .Total Design Capacity ',
❑ Gilts = 3•.
El Boars ;, . Total SSLW
�.
Number'of Lagiions 1 Holding Ponds . I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
=E ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General.
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancetimprovemrnt?
❑ Yes 1e"No
2. Is any discbarge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes t2<
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
❑ Yes -❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
C1 Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No.
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes LKO
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes zal o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
maintenanceliimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback cfiteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes 62�o
;Po�
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
•7/25/97
Continued on back

Facikty Number: 45-
-8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures fl.a oons Iloldin Ponds Flush fits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: / f
Freeboard (ft): .............4 .............. ....
1.J.r.......................................................... ..............................
10, is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any either threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/imPrnvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
C
Structure 5
..................................... ....
Cl Yes 10.0e
❑ Yes z ')
Structure h
&d <; ❑ No
wasteApplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 42 , 'o
(If in excess of WMP. or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) NFEVC
15. Crop type ....... ..................................................................................................................--...._.._..........................-_...---.._.......................,.......,.._....�......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste ]`Management Plan (A1� N111)? 1142
Yes .1 5
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes t 'o
1$. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
f�
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? _V ❑ Ycs (.�.i*it�
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes EW -0
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes 'o
22. Does record keeping need improvement". ❑ Yes : "o
F'orCertilied or -Permitted Facilifies-Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste :Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes t o
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MP? ❑ Yes s To
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes s o
No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this. visit. Youm'ill receive no further
correspondence about this visit:
Cotiments-'(i4e.ri to question #):
Explairrany ' ES answers and/or any recon.y. endations-or any other comtfiients,� , a 1 `
i7se drawmgs.ot'facility to better
eikplain situations. (use additional pages as necessarn ):
\
a
T
�
7/25197
H,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
r Date:
LD CL_�_
� b

•.
S

J
O Routine O Com laint O Follow-up of DW inspection Follow-up of DSNVC review O Other
Date of Inspection �- -'•! 7
Facility Number S Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status:Registered [IApplied for Permit (ez:I.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
6 Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farre Name: ,_����t-C2F.�5 /a+4f Ry 1 w County:
Land Omer Name: 1 ► . �12L� ^QC" .. _ Phone No: � LL...01
Facility Cotact: 1! A 7D 1k` _ Title: --- - - _. �.�� Phone No: .L ??
n -20 }
Mailing Address: ` 2p-... _ ��
Onsite Representative:./?nf o Integrator:
Certified Operator: ft ..... _....... Operator Certification Number:--,----
Location
umber:..,..-.._............-
Location of Farm:
1.W? TEF FR Ess..! . D._ i- V41 -1-6Y fir-+,.. _�E 11 � �_ SQu ! s,l E01111-6 &RPOAT
Latitude 35 • ®` SJ " Longitude
type of operation ant] vesign Capacity
Sw�iie A Desigrt y' Current :Design �Ca ent Y., besign Current
K r .'C. aes Population
iou1�Y Ca achy Po `iilattan.. Cattle _ ,Ca act Po` lila"hon"
Wean to FeederLaw-
El
Feeder to Finish Non -Laver Noa-
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder Total DestgnICapt;city,
#40 Farrow to Finish 41 a
/•--may �
` Others s_ is M'' a„ �F Y.is. b's t +.,... S
' .�?F �ah r;� _.M-s,F-� ,t,�ry.,: •,;t.:-� ._.. ._..._. - . .. .. ........ _ ,y.���,
r ,Number of Lagoons ItiHolding Ponds 10 O Subsurface Drains Present
a
�y3Lagoon Area x.: Spray Field Area �<
x�i;.w $maya8>a`,Sr '& �a !a.+w x _ •` q;`�.y".aes3,"w+.3.$ 1k �3.�w'nxur. ... ..z ._
neral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement`? ❑ Yes No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 1 (rYes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field E6 Other
r
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Ycs ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) P'Ym ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? le M
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes ONo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ,LYes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes (&No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require t9Yes ❑ No
4/30197 _ maintettaamprovement? Continued on back

Facility Number:
.5. Is facility not in compliance with any ap cable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Q N' o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? a ❑ Yes ,N No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Wo
Structures (Lagoons and/gr Holding. Ponds) N11.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (fl): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Aooliention
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop typey..RLE
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP7
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes (gNo
❑ Yes 6No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes Ej No
G(Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Eq'No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cofiu n '(refer to questtori`##}:= Exp" Wr any YES answers and/or any recomm.&h a4dns or any other comments
Use drawings of facility,to better explain situations.,(use additional pages as necessary}
�i! G•l q�+r� ri! ptKu� �i�60 czCQ l0 c[ /"
4
5 ��►� r rou��q
Y
Ato'(-te, ' Pie K Ca L{ 5 COY C3z ! ce y o o n 3 Ca) -Li h� 1 a" d E✓ e r 5; o N S, I,�OP � r r7
1p"I re55 opt C�faon .
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: —7
cc. Division of Water Qua&3i Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4130/97

I
r4 �a L—' �.sr�J .. k � x5: .nxt�cr r TFv �t,7tx :,.+ ;: sib !rac �� i:nrK, �
M `o DSWC Anim eedlot Operation Review � n
fit. s.r
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection ❑ � c4 .A ,ife
x'.^H`-r.. .. ""R -22 -AN
19 routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of SWC review p Other
FDate of Inspection
Facility I\umber 5151V7 _j _
Time of inspection 24 hr. (bh:mm)
I otal i ime (in traction of hours
Farm Status: N Registered p Applied for Permit (ea: 5.25 for I fir 15 min)) Spent on Rer"ic«"
p Certified p Permitted or Inspection 0ncludes travel and processing)
in Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Small Acx=DA&7 ............ ....................................... ............................... ...
Owner Name: William Johnston
Facilih Contact:
Title:
County: Htadermn.................................. .... AgQ...........
Phone No: 891-1281
Phone No:
Mailing Address:�aerra.��a. _................ ...................... k�tgl1e� .N�............... ..... _ ............................... �?.
...........
Onsite Representative: WMalgq JRhnkston............ .... integrator:........ .
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude ©. ©• ®� Longitude ®. ©• ©�
Type of Operation Design 'Current, Design Current Design" Ct rreat .
Swine -Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ can to P coder
❑ er to PEEF
❑ arrow to Wc­aD
❑ Farrow to er
❑ VWOw to F"Ea
O Other
Number 4,Lagoons /:Holding Ponds. ❑` u su ace Drains Present p soon Area 113 Spray Neld
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancerimprovement? ❑ Yes lq No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at_ ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify- DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated floe- in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3" Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4f30/97 maintenance/improvement?
® Yes ❑ No
IM Yes p No
❑ Yes ® No
small
❑ Yes U No
5111 Yes p No
❑ Yes ENO
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on bad:

` pa . Numben 45-7
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a eerlified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Stricture I Structure 2 Structure 3
..................3.................. I...............................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancerunprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Structure 4
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type CoM.(§i1 .�.C_A._M .. iA.�.�lf l�A � e > ��X�.....- ......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated m o'An=l Waste Management Pian (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ® No
C] Yes H No
❑ Yes in No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ❑ No
E3 Yes C] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comenta r F
ureter toquestron #j-skzplain any'Y answers andlor any recommendations or any ot#tercotnments.`
r - n'^ t3. e m he
©se cl swings: of fa tv,to.b itfer explains uatioas. (use acldtlsoaal pages as necessiryj
Question 2: NM Pa—rior waste is discharging to an open field GZMe re da6, barn. The waste is has built up ., trt ft oes not reach
.,
waters of the stale at this time. This problem has been addressed in the proposed waste management plan.
Question 3: This discharge has evidently occured since the construction of this barn.
[comments: Facility will have a pond put in to collect parlor waste and lot run-off and a second scrape pit will be added to suppliment
e existing scrape pit to hold lot waste. Facility is working toward certification.
Reviewer/Inspector Name doieph C. Zhn> rnia n
Reviewer/lnspecter Signature: Date:
cc : Division of Waier Ouafity, Water Quality Sec ion, Facr&y Assessment Unit 4/30/97

p Routine p Complaint p o w -up of BWQ inspection p o w -up of DbW4U review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facilitv Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
o tate (in fraction of—hours
Farm Status: Registry (ex: 1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel andprocessing)
Farm Name: O -AMM ----- _--- --- County: I enderson
Owner Name: Wiftm `_.. — dohnstou_ w _ _ Phone No: 891-17&1
Mailing Address: 470 Jeffress Road Fletcher NC 28732
Onsite Representative: _ ___ �, _
Certified Operator: W1�_
Location of Farm:
Integrator.
Operator Certfication Number.
Latitude ©. ' ®" Longitude ®. ©4 ilii µ
In Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine.": Number .
p Wean to Feeder p k ar
E3 Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farow to f92der
Ponitry - f Number _ :"Cade Number -
p IM Dairy 250
p Non -Laver 113 Non -Dairy
E3 Other Type of
?�.�i i�s iTaym:F>ib.eG.r �eo.efr Lt a�"gyolo-- ns " H-`orba3r[ng Po„nds -� :ez s 'mis-} f s�rLir:vestok -
A.
rr
t
> s ecTIMES resen
..t.
r
apOon f'P.a:SprSy Field AreA
,.:�-.:k� .a.:As 's �'>• t �kZ . . £?`Tr ,. .ui. ..a s�x:'. F f; -
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maimtenancefmtprovement? p Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
a. If discharge is observed, was the coin eyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c_ If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge by-pass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsibolding ponds) require p Yes p No
maintemnceJmrprovement?
Contarsed on bark

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI)
OLLECTOR(S): icy C-
AG
Estimated BOD Range: 0-515.25/25.65/40.180 w 00 p Re% STATION LOCATION:.57AIALL -
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No REMARKS:
Station l<Y
mg/l
Chi a: TTI 82217
ug/1
IBOD5
COUNTY
I'
PRIG ORITY
SAMPLE TYPE�_)
COD Low 835
RPM HASIN�
AU
❑AMBIENT ❑
❑STREAM
'ffEFFLUENT
REPORT TG
FRO MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
QA
A
Residue: Total 500
AT BM
mgA
OMPLIANCE❑ CHAIN
Or
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
MBA5 38260
OF CUSTODY
13
❑ESTUARY
ug/l
Sulfate 945
Shipped by: Bus Courle Staf , ther
EMERGENCY
mg/l
Ce-Calclum 916
mg/l
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/l
Fe-€ron 1045
ug/(
OLLECTOR(S): icy C-
AG
Estimated BOD Range: 0-515.25/25.65/40.180 w 00 p Re% STATION LOCATION:.57AIALL -
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No REMARKS:
Station l<Y
mg/l
Chi a: TTI 82217
ug/1
IBOD5
310
Pheophytin a 32213
COD High 340
3
COD Low 835
4
Collform, MF Fecal 31616
Color: pH 7.6 82
Coliform: MF Total 31504
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615
7
Coliform: Fecal Strop 31573
A
Residue: Total 500
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
20
Residue: Suspended 530
Volatile 535
Fixed 640
PH 403
Acidity to pH 4.5 436
Acidity to pH 8.3 435
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415
Alkaiinity to pH 4.5 410
TOC 680
Turbidity 76
)ate Begin Ivy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date
mg/I
mg/I
/SOOmI
Chloride 940
/100ml
/100ml
/100ml
meJ]
mg/1
mg/l
units
mg/i
mg/1
mg/1
MUM
m01
NM
Time
r:n. 1-h rlre Mar.V
Lab Number: 17
mg/l
Chi a: TTI 82217
ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209
ug/l
Pheophytin a 32213
ug/l
Color: True 80
Pt -Co
Color.(pH 183
ADM[
Color: pH 7.6 82
ADMI
Cyanide 720
mg/l
Fluoride 951
mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880
mg/l
Grease and Oils 556
mgA
Hardness Total 900
mg/l
Specific Cond. 95
uMhos/cm2
MBA5 38260
mg/i
Phenols 32730
ug/l
Sulfate 945
mgA
Sulfide 745
mg/l
Ce-Calclum 916
mg/l
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/l
Fe-€ron 1045
ug/(
r:n. 1-h rlre Mar.V
Lab Number: 17
I
Date Received: 9
-16'- fJ— Time: 0
Recd b ,
From: Bus-Cwuri r -Han
DATA ENTRY BY:
S v' CK, CA4/yL
HATE REPORTED:
mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666
tngA
I / A H L
NH3 as N 610
mgA
TKN as N 625
mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
mgA
P, Total as P 665
mg/I
PO4 as P 70507
mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666
tngA
Hg-Mureury 71900
ug/l
Cd- ;admWot 1027
ugA
CrChromlum:Total 1034
USA
Cu -Copper 1042
USA
NMickel 1067
ug/€
Pb -Lead 1051
UPI
Zn-Zlnc 1092
ug/l
10
300 is
A ilver 1077
ug/)
Ai -Aluminum 1105
ug/l
Be -Beryllium 1012
ug/l
Ce-Calclum 916
mg/l
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/l
Fe-€ron 1045
ug/(
T S B I C /'G ; GNXX
1.1-1.1thium 1132
ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/l
Mn -Manganese 1055
ug/l
Na-Sodlum 929
mg/l
Arsenic -Total 1002
ug/l
Se-Selanium 1147
ug/l
Hg-Mureury 71900
ug/l
Organochlorine Pesticides
Oruarwohoenhorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeabie Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytopienkton
Sampling Point li
Conductance at 26 C
Water Temperature 10
D.O. m9A
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Tempenttute 10
PH U pH 4.5
pH 4.6 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 is
400 .
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipltlon On/day)
Cloud Cover S
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ff.
Stream Width it.
/G
480
45
132
36
11351
1350
135
64
14
T F C 16, 3 ep 1 (.
DMI/Revised 10/86

•
Figure 7
•
Division of Enviro=mmtai Management
CH AIH of Cu i6r RE00$D
Far - Investigation . of 5A L 1- 7 -
Samples collected and Ma farmer completed by:
-,b Only Station.
hab No, No. Station Location
T
'ate
iD� '
Relinquished by
Received by
mALL
A ow -9
_4C- :
Relindbiahed bpi tures) :
fle e: veQ by Si
tun) : Date
-/K-Ss —
Time
.7130
Rel
Rec by
1 .
Rec by
Rel
Sec by (Lab)
�
ti od of Shipment:
Secur ry
Seal b
Type and Condition: Lock b
Broken b
en by:
.. a
TAR IMP nUT V
IAb No.
From Through
No.
Containers
Anal Qia
Relinquished by
Received by
Date Tize
i
11.1ge 5-5

Site Requires Immediate Attention: Y6�s
r
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT .
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS S11FE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 5f? /3 , 1995
Time: 3 - vv
Farm Name/Owner: 1�1_t hGeW
Mailing Address: /-7-1- 6 -7 C H 613 .. v �- _ � 61
County: C --A--.10 C-(KSON
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: 13,t- L� z_ I'c6f� scL S C, 15aju - Phone: E-17 ! - I 2 -
Physical
Physical Address/Locadon: SePr- rSS R ! I?�� _ E q 5�- m� ff u�Y �-& oX/ q
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle x j )-417
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: ;Z3D
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: F 5 ' Sy " Longitude: .3 ' /0 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No 1� Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches ,'/�
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Y s or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No `%
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or NooX Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: ti/l
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No �'
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes org)
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes otg)
Additional Comments:
X - 5'CKPFi _41W65_ FOR 101✓uRe_ - - -
upoFF w rc-4 _ /4/L9 Fi4�DR wF 51{-IXxrV CCC -5 ro F/C,.11
la
Tt��, E5g �� L �f9�Fi1{l�i �II.+T, Nap 5�i�c�Gc
-
Inspector Name Signature
/WST of 1-#c- prs�E{/�RGF Sec-mE� ro Cc o�IG/ger -Ti�� r owl 5:. e ri�E �� A�fiRy
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
r.

3
h
�
S
J
�

+ slUslim,Al, rk

1�
rhk
G
�
�
N

1 `1� .���:, fir•-.�. .�'w: �,: ! rr .F A /�'k�f�+ '�_ 1 � ^�• �.