440064_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I t / Arrival Time: Departure Time:j:QIJ County: Region:
Farm Name: G e,(_jbC,�_ 6?KleV Owner Email: LJ1,+- ,& Aff t PT A/
Owner Name: t J leS{Lb7jL hone:
Mailing Address: cl- Imo` +t c /Je- b
Physical Address: q -7 q grizzxDptyi+ CA,,,�,1j N c
Facility Contact: d ll. Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:�]� DQu .1+� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 1 f / (t � Longitude: SET
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes. notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes. notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[] Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop. Wet PQuit
Capacity
Pop.
Cantle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
t, 'I 11-ayer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
-Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current "'
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. Poultry
Ca aeity
P,o
Non -Dai
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
1pullets
Reef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes. notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes. notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[] Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
D NE
❑ Yes
gl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2142015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: /I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No XLNA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ NA
Identifier:
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
C,No
❑ NA
Spillway?:
the appropriate box.
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑WUP E] Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
Observed Freeboard (in):
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Yes
KNo
❑ NA
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[-]Yes
❑ No
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
MANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify D%%'R
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
IV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aoolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
SQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If ves. check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes MNo [DNA [DNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop WindowF1Evidence of Wind�D�,ril [:]Application Outside of �Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):-17 MM ,� /
�-Wl � �— Hrt-Y
13. Soil Type(s): 6f -t k0b " _ _ EV AQ -.--
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes &� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 5Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No M NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
❑ Yes C4 No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes 1�2LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
C,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP E] Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis []Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[-]Yes
❑ No
�NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes
❑ No
JZLNA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - to Date of Ins tion:
24. Did the facility fail to calibratewaste app kation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E& No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [] No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fait to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CA WMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
U
aatrecoi
❑ NA ❑ NE
WA ❑ NE
RNA ❑ NE
0,NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rV No [:]NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes C�kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes MNo E]NA E]NE
❑ Yes No
❑ YesLzht
No
❑ Yes f�d No
10 �l ��_& l(0 W�si l�� PoYLT_.
�f-
C,Z
Sol � q -3o 60
�P a
aor
�s ct Sid �e*e Y Q
wt �� SP,'.A caV rv!!CX +�n
❑ NA
❑ NE
NA
[] NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
-4,,, t4, _� , - -< i� le AAzt4l"—
_+V _14 P evoo eet -�-efcl -
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 8 d{(9 " `%b`{
Date: �i 13��C71
2141201;

... Division of Water Resour�
Facitih° Number q�,� - O DiAsion of Soil and �i'ate servation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: y Arrival Time: Departure Time: r ;1 County:^ Region: Ago
f
Farm Name: UjNC ReA;,,,4j Li itQ� rc� 6ee4g,, U_(
— U
Owner Name: Lub)C gawae,( i,1UcS4m_.k Ct � LLG
Owner Email:
Phone: < ;L:?- C_q&L� 700
Mailing Address: S 9 q 126. AsLe-y r iLe N C $$d(v
Physical Address: 474F 54oel Dr+Yt Ca", NC 2RZA,
Facility Contact: fir, 1, Title: r
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: NA — Qr
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: 36t'.33" 10 11,
Longitude: ga b 50" 00 &
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -Layer
rou
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Ifyes. notify DWR)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dai Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker 700
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[:]NA
❑NE
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
?. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesNo F-1NA [—]NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

FacRq, number: - Date of Ins eetion: q/
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stone storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No � NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Spillway?:
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
[� No
Observed Freeboard (in):
the appropriate box.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
[4 NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes['� No
E] NA
E] NE
waste management or closure plan?
Waste Application ❑ Weekly freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E]No
rM NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): F<_ Lit /Drr�oA IC-1-ovc- — %I*,ari Corn
13. Soil Type(s): U J e,,-+ i►e n4 S F_ Var d r
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No Qj NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes VJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[::]Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps E]Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes. check the appropriate box below.
LAJ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[] Yes
❑ No
[ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412075 Continued

' Faeitiiy Number: 14 - Date of Inspection-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app rcation equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
W NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[] No
1X] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[:]No
M NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
[] NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[b No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Commixid',(refeir to`quesdon ft Explain any: YES.anwers,and/or any adEiitional recommendiLtionsi6ritart3 other comments.k' r
Us'e, rawi s f'iacili}� 'ta better plain.sitaations ruse` additi©nal, apes as;neces {�� t z
t : e'�f' \ 1) b s"`' .1�/• .Y .^ a `A, [ . •-;rr ss•-+_ !'" +t'e, -y�, _ y
lye" Wast{ 0---,( 'Sfj Jv CC+V4,k 40JI nppljCa-TrC)tj5,
it CornpE�Ae SLD Fern -IS,
, !
aq. Ju -e --
All cvtls � o,h :3 tic; �; Ly S �i�u �ad b a
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: '893-
Date:
89$-Date: q /y A
21412015

v • .
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II��iI
Facility Number: 4064 -- - Facility Status: Proposed Permit: AWC440064 Ll Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: )eine _ County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 09101201.3 _ Entry Time: 12:00 PM Exit Time: 12:50 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: WNC Recgi_nal Livestock Center LLC Owner Email: LWARD99(@A0L.00
Owner: Wnc Regional Livestock Center LLC Phone: [phone]___
Mailing Address: 594 Brevard_ Rd Asheville NC 2$806
Physical Address: 474 Stock Or _ Canton NC 28716
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°33'10" _ Longltude: 82°49'60"
Interstate 40, exit 33 onto SR 1004 114 mi. to SR 1613 and then 114 mile.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
4� 0OD
�9
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

0 •
1
Permit: AWC440064 Owner -f=acility: Wnc Regional Livestock Center LLC Facility Number: 440064
Inspection Date: 09/30/2013 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Permit: AWC440064 owner -Facility: Wnc Regional Livestock Center LLC Facility Number: 440064
Inspection Date: 09130/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other Cl
a_ Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ Cl ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWo)
❑
❑
❑
Q
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
❑
❑
❑
from a discharge?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
❑
❑
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.1large trees, severe
❑
❑
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
❑
0
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
Q
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC440064 Owner - Facility: Wnc Regional Livestock Center LLC
Facility Number : 440064
Inspection Date: 09/30/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
❑ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA,
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Wl1P?
❑❑❑❑
0000
J
Page: 4

Permit: AWC440064 owner - Facility: Wnc Regional Livestock Center LLC Facility Number. 440064
Inspection Date: 09/3012013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
■ ■ ■ ■
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22_ Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
000
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
000
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
0
000
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Cl
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

• `
Permit: AWC440064 Owner - Facility: Wnc Regional Livestock Center LLC Facility Number: 440064
Inspection Date: 09/30/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Q Q Q ❑
Page: 6