440036_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: eparture Time: F1T7W_A:R County: i i /fit Region:
Farm Name: O"ITTAY Owner Email: t
SZ�-g_ C
Owner Name: f iZ� Phone:_q 365<0
f � r �
Mailing Address: �* FU&h(e4- tl�ek ��1L . CS4 d/� /`r e(o
Physical Address: / ( ` AjC �0 79-
I ��d�- �oG � rQ �>� J�-�, � ydep
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: , Phone: gGd U " ?L
k4 &_r,
Latitude:
Integrator: N/A
Certification Number: Vv v2 3.bQ
Certification Number:
Longitude:
'r.l'� `l� �s aeek. VI 1 Ti��1 6,6D.� Ikt'<<Sl fLchh l� r�G� r6..5
I4s�� �� Cf- c��
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes YJ No ❑ NA ❑ NF
❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
rrent���k� Design Current
Design Currt
�1y0
vA 2.� 'K €'p VVetPoultCapartty Pop "
Cattle Capacity Po
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
Wean to Finish
Laver IDairy
Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non La er I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish�ss
Farrow to Wean
;:: '`_,
> ¢ Design Current
Dai Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
rt: -,.D Po 1:.Ca actty ;Pa
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkevs
Other
I url:ev Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes YJ No ❑ NA ❑ NF
❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
PKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page l of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility \umber: - . Date of Inspection: /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: 1451 -
Spillway?:�
Designed Freeboard (in):
1�
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any, of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
lew No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DV1'R
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
DgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks.. or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes. check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
5Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types): r_ p" S I h� *M,<C-ae, �ki f _f)tvf k 02,01
13. Soil Type(s): tt-C ark k n6b IL C& j—);t lS bolez
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes J Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes (4 No ❑ NA [:]NE
Reguired Records R Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ® Yes Iftmo ❑ NA] NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes � No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes H No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes � No
[] NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

V
Facility Number: jDate_ of Inspection:
24. Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the e
pp q } p
rm
it?
0 Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
[] Yes
❑ No
6NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑ Yes
NZNo
❑ NA
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
VJ'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
DqNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
NZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
CKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge. freeboard problems. over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
JK Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Cumrrients (refer to question.#): Explain any YES answers and/or anyadditional recommendations or any,other comments, �„_"
U seld raRrynac Cfacillty.to better, eaplainisituntions (use additional paizes as necessary).
�Oftc,T- A04-1
AV// % --)-O 13` ALV A)' L9, 5/0
A�e 9 d ze'ro `f 6" /UO,4 0)'aJ
-9� ho 6t4ed dee k--P� 4
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
2/4/2015

t' d', ,I � � �Drsis`ioa of Water Resour�
Facility iVamr l 7 1 - ®,17th inion of Soil and Nate reservation
��Uther Age
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1'i Arrival Time: r� Departure Time: County: {�ywpQd Region: ARO
Farm Name: at'k-w"s &Z+ArS txiE:V_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Eggldi S. Park Ji S r Phone: 1.2 i35_0 (C.01)
4 3q Pderfhe, Creek Rd -
NJ ailing
d-
NJailing Address:
Je NG a
Physical Address: 13j;L DM
N a 9 7.;Q
Facility Contact: �—StS 35UEa�IA
Onsite Representative: .,A� �ArKc /7 Integrator:
Certified Operator: „ >DOL Certification `'umber: � �r
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
NA
[D NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DW R) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes V] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? 0
Page I of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Joi
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [+ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: muLd.o
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of an), of the structures observed? Dyes JpNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6_ Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks. and/or wet stacks)
❑Other:
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes
09 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and i" Rainfall Inspections
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffets, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need❑Yes
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
�] No
DNA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes `r' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu. Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift1AA"r-,-5— p Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CVo�^r1 Se/aq �<-- FeSince- � - -
13. Soil Type(s): to h r TGOQ, k - � �.�aqoLB[ gilt U& t&
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Dyes M]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
❑ Yes k No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If ves, check
t Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists to Design ❑ Maps [] Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes. check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
§0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and i" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
L61 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Eacili Number: L/ - Date of Inspection: i -/,
2 Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app kation equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0 No MA NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA [_]NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
A Yes [%J No
❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes Co No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[] Yes J4 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refereto,questiob:#): Explain. any YES ansv►ers,,and/or any additional recommendations or any otherrcommentL- i
i se drsRmgsiuf- ciH to better,..explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary,).:
5es; I,0I Zl tS !-uC0'j 4;f wd Nz0.33 l44rdvagd,
Utas Q"' I
1SD N= $'.-27
l6)oa
3t4 r tr .. o,#j5- !r rt t.0
3 � r u
sso AI= 1.69
lb -+4
� IV
i9/5 -C. 'r W=0.9516' t t It I/
SSD N = !.6!
if •t
Ao. iJGta J 71 e OOa Ad dlis/e N"T�rI��
[J o
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 92 0 .Pg1` rro S
Date: VzZ _V2L
2/412015

• PAT MCCRORY
FILI: Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Water Resources S. JAY Z T M M E R M AN
ENVERONMENTAL OUALrrY
Director
February 12, 2016
Mr. Randall Parkins
Parkins Brothers Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Parkins Brothers Dairy —
Facility 4 44-36
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Parkins:
On December 29, 2015, I conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the
animal waste handling system for the Parkins Brothers Farm. The facility
appeared to be well maintained and the record keeping was in good order.
Thank you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any questions
regarding this inspection or need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to
contact me at [phone]. Please review the Inspection Report for additional
comments/observations.
Sincerely, I
Ed Williams
Environmental Senior Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589
Raccoon Road Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
CAFO Files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Remurces
Ashcwlk Regional Office
2090 US 70 Highway, Swatmeaoa, North Carolina 28776
828-2964686
i

•
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
440036 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWC440036
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
1312 DOC Graham Rd
Reason for Visit-
Routine
County: Haywood Region:
Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/29/2015 Entry ilrne: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am
Farm Name:
Parkins Brothers Dairy
Owner.
Randall S Parkins
IWailing Address:
1312 DOC Graham Rd
Physical Address:
1312 DOC Graham Rd
Facility Status
Clyde NC 28721
Clyde NC 28721
Incident V
Owner Email:
Phone:
628-627-6120
IIIIIII Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: latitude: 35° 40' 10" Longitude: 82° 58' 30"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile ebt of interstate 40 [ 1-00 to Fines creek Exit, Turn Right, Go 0.1 miles, Tum Right
and go ).5 miles to Farm]
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certfied Operator. Randall S Parkins Operator Certification Number: 21360
Secondary OIC(s):
On.Slte Representattve(s): Name TRIe Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone
Primary Inspector. Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The facility appeared to be well maintained and the record keeping was in good order.
page: 1

Dry Stack 02 01/01/49
Waste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 45.00
page: 2
Permit: AWC440036
Owner - Facility :
Randa[I S Parkins
Facility Number:
440036
Inspection Date: 12/29/15
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle
�Meilk Cow
150
104
Total Design Capacity:
150
Total SSLW:
210,000
Waste Structures
Disignated
Observed
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date
Freeboard
Freeboard
Dry Stack 02 01/01/49
Waste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 45.00
page: 2

1 . 0
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility : Randall S Parkins Facility Number. 440036
Inspection Date: 12/29115 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts
Yea No No Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
❑
Excessive Ponding?
Structure
❑
M ❑
❑
Application Field
❑
❑
PAN?
Other
❑
0 ❑
❑
a. Was conveyance manmade?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑
M ❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge? "
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed andlor managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ARplication
Yea No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs,?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number:
440036
No Na No
Inspection Date: 12/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
M ❑ ❑
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com (silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Checklists?
Crop Type 4
Design?
Crop Type 5
Maps?
Crop Type 6
Lease Agreements?
Soil Type 1
Other?
Soil Type 2
If Other, please specify
Soil Type 3
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
Soil Type 4
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Soil Type 5
Waste Application?
Soil Type 6
Weekly Freeboard?
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
Soil analysis?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ M ❑
❑
determination?
Rainfall?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
1101111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility : Randall S Parkins Facility Number. 440036
Inspection Date: 12/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
NQ Na Me
26. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
Crop yields?
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
120 Minute inspections?
❑
❑
M ❑ ❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
30_ Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
Sludge Survey
❑
(i.e_, discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0011
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No Ne
26. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30_ Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑ ❑
(i.e_, discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 0 ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
page: 5

4 A "A
L C-1
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Randall Parkins
Parkins Brothers Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Dear Mr. Parkins:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
December 31, 2014
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Parkins Brothers Dairy —
Facility # 44-36
Haywood County
On December 17, 2014, I conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for the Parkins Brothers Farm. The facility appeared to be well maintained
and the record keeping was in good order.
Thank you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any questions regarding
this inspection or need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact me at (828)
2964500. Please review the Inspection Report for additional comments/observations.
S ly,
Ed Williams
Environmental Senior Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Raccoon
Road Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
CAFO Files
Water Quality Regional Operations —AshevMe Regional office
2090 U.S. HgftM 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone: 828.2%A500 FAX: [phone]
lnter httpJ1portal.nodenrorgAvebh q
An Equal opportunity 1 AfirrmaWe Adan Empoyer

.4
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440036
Facility Status: Active
Pertrdt AWC440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit Routine
County:
Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit 12/1712014 F_„try Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident S
Farm Name: Parkins Brothers Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner. Randall S Parkins
Phone: 828-627$120
Mailing Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd
Ctyde NC 28721
Physical Address. 1312 DOC Graham Rd
Ctyde NC 28721
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant integrator.
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35" 40' 10" Longitude: 82° 58'30"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ 1-40 to lines creek Exit, Tum Right, Go 0.1 miles, Tum Right
and go ).5 miles to Farm]
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, S Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other issues
Certified Operator. Randall S Parkins Operator Certification Number: 21360
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name Tale Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature.-
Secondary
ignature:Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The facility appeared to be well maintained and records were in good order_
Phone:AW76
�
Date:
page: 1

Dry Stack 02 01101/49
Waste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 38.00
page: 2
Permit: AWC440036
Owner - Facility :
Randall S Parkins
Facility Number:
440036
Inspection Date: 12/17/14
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow
154
96
Total Design Capacity:
150
Total SSLW:
210,000
Waste Structures
Disignated
Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date
Freeboard
Freeboard
Dry Stack 02 01101/49
Waste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 38.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility : Randall 5 Parkins Facility Number. 440036
Inspection Date. 12/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discha es & Stream impacts
Yes No Na No
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at
❑
Excessive Ponding?
Structure
❑
■ ❑
❑
Application Field
❑
❑
PAN?
Other
❑
❑
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
i ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑
0 ❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0011
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alteratives that need
❑ . 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

• 0
[l
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number:
440036
Inspection Date: 12/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Nagle
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fesme (Flay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
`
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑ '
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
119. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
[❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WtJP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑ {
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
j
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

r.
14
s •
Permit AVVC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number. 440036
Inspection Date: 12/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Records and Documents
Yea No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
❑
■ ❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
❑
0 ❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If seceded, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
24- Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 1:1
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in chargee?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No W we
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, aver -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ M ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ M ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ M ❑ ❑
page: 5

a. L- AM=
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Govemor
Mr. Randall Parkins
Parkins Brothers Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Dear Mr. Parkins:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
December 19. 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Compliance inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Parkins Brothers Dairy — Facility # 44-36
Haywood County
On December 18, 2012, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for Parkins Brothers Dairy.
The facility appears to be well maintained and the records were in good order. Please refer to
the attached inspection report for additional concems/comments.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and I appreciate your assistance during the
inspection, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
S� ly,
d Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers Haywood County Soil 8r Water Conservation District 589 Raccoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786 w/enclosure
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION — Asheville Regional Office (ARO) NonithCa>rohna
2090 U.S- 70 Highway, Swannanoa, NC 28778.8211 Nah(rallyPhone: 828-296-95D01 FAX: [phone]
Inlemet: wwwn[aeaterquafitY-o_-m
AR Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency I--1
Facility Number : 440036 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qgmoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: AshgviII2
Date of Visit: 1211012 Entry Time: 10.00 AM , Exit Time: 11:30 AM incident #:
Farm Name: Parkins Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Randall S Parkins Phone: $2&627-120
Mailing Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rg_ Clyde NC 28721
Physical Address: 1312 DOC Grah@M Rd Clyde NC 28721
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°40'10" Longitude: 62"56'30"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd_ at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ 1-40 to Fines creek Exit, Tum Right, Go 0.1 miles, Tum Right and
go ).5 miles to Farm]
Question Areas:
W Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
ij Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Randall S Parkins Operator Certification Number: 21360
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector. Edward M Williams
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The faci;ity appeared to be well maintained and the records were in good order.
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Perkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 1211712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 150 118
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
ry Stack 02 01/01/49
aste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 33.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC440036 owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 1 211 712 0 1 2 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Stale? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
11000
■
❑ ❑
2. 1s there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection* Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
Q
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe 0000
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance attematives that need maintenance or
110110
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
Inspection Date: 12/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number; 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue
(Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
Q
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ Cl
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
fl
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0011
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC44DO36 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
Inspection Date: 12/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑
Cl
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 000
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number; 440036
Inspection Date: 12/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional 11000
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency r�
Facility Number . 440036 Facility Status: Active - Permit: AWG440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Ins a ion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: HaZy2gd Region: Aghevift
Date of Visit 12/17/201;x_ Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM__ Incident M
Fann Name: Parkins Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Randall S Parkins Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1312 DOC earn Rd — Clyde NC 28721
Physical Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd _ Clyde NC 28721
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°40'10" Longitude: 82'58'30"
Panther Creek off l=ines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ 1-40 to Fines creek Exit, Tum Right, Go 0.1 miles, Tum Right and
go ).5 miles to Farm]
Question Areas:
© Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Randall S Parkins
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number. 21360
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
'�s
(7-G,�'4)"i : "�-,
icy -tom- ��
Date:
Page: 1

u
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/1712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges R Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b_ Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 01300
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ❑
❑
❑
3_ Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ Q
❑
❑
from a discharge?
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
Waste Application
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

0 •
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 1211712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 00110
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional 01300
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? 0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
■
■ ■ ■ ■
Page: 6

0 0
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall 5 Parkins
Inspection Date: 12/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists? ✓
❑
Design? `�
❑
Maps? ✓
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ✓
❑
Weekly Freeboard? /
❑
Waste Analysis? .�
❑
Soil analysis? /
❑
Waste Transfers? ✓
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall? ,//
❑
Stocking? ✓
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
1100
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
0000
Page: 5

• _ ���
NCDE RR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
Mr. Randall Parkins
Parkins Brothers Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Aquifer Protection Section
January 14, 2011
Natural Resources
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Parkins Brothers Dairy — Facility # 44-36
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Parkins:
On December 15, 2010, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for Parkins Brothers Dairy.
The facility appears to be well maintained and the records were in good order. Please refer to the
attached inspection report for additional concemslcomments.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and I appreciate your assistance during the
inspection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
5 ,1 ely, /
d Williams
Environmental Specialist
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Raccoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786 wlenclosure
Joe Hudyncia, Divisionof Som Water Winston-Salem Regional Office
tAgpifer✓Protection-SCction.Files-ARO
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION — AsheviAe Regional Office FARO)
2090 U.S. 70 Hghway, Swannanoa, NC 28778-8211
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] O -D e
Customer Service:4 77-623-6748 NorthC/a+Q�i�rofiina
Internet: www.ngvaterouaGty.arg ���!-ii i
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affimu*n Acton Employer

r
j
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 440036 — Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC4400X- ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Ins ction _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routint _ County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 121152010 Entry Time: 12:00 PM Exit Time: 01;Q0 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Parkins Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner. Randall rkiin5 _ Phone: 82"27-6120
Mailing Address: 1312 DOC Gcoham Rd C[Irde NC 28721
Physical Address: 1512 DO Clyde NC 26721
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3'40'10" Longitude: 82`58'30"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ 1-40 to Fines creek Exit, Tum Right, Go 0.1 miles, Tum Right and
go ).5 miles to Farm)
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number_
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins
Title
Phone:
On-site representative Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector. Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectorts):
Inspection Summary:
The facility appeared to be well maintained and the record keeping was in good order.
Phone
Page: 1

ti
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/15/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 150 103
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
ry Stack 02 01/01/49
aste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 33.00
Page: 2

r
•
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility. Randall 5 Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/152010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
©ischa es & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance manmade? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b_ Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures tach adequate markers as required by the penrrit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0000
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

�J
ti
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
Inspection data: 12115/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (flay. Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page. 4

01
rd
Permit AWC440036 Owner- Facility: Randall 5 Parkins Facility
Number: 44D036
Inspection Data: 1 211 512 01 0 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
0
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis? r
❑
Annual soil analysis? .
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ 0 ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or GAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

i •
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number : 440038
Inspection tate: 12/15/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Spray Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
0
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

I
A,4*A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Govemor
Mr. Randall Parkins
Parkins Brothers Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Dear Mr. Parkins:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
Aquifer Protection Section
January 4, 2010
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Parkins Brothers Dairy -- Facility # 44-36
Haywood County
On December 22, 2009, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for Parkins Brothers Dairy.
The facility appears to be well maintained and the records were in good order. Please refer to the
attached inspection report for additional concerns/comments.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and I appreciate your assistance during the
inspection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
C"�`^ (�
Wllliam5
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786 wlenclosure
Joe Hudyncia, Division of Soil & Water Winston-Salem Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION — Asheville Regional Office (ARO)
2090 U,S. 70 Highway, Swannanoa, NC 28778.8211
Phone: [phone] FAX : [phone] One
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Norih Carolina
Internet: www._ncwaterquarity-onq AlatuK rally
An Egvg Opporlumiy 1 Affirmative Adion Employer

IT
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440036 ,_ Facility Status: Ac;ive Permit: AWC440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region: aheyille -
Date of Visit: 12/22/2009 _ _ Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Parkins Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner. Randall SParkins
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1312QOC Graham Rd Qyde NC 28721
Physical Address: IZ12 POC GrahamI1 Rd Clyde NC 28721 _
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°411'10" Longitude: 82'58'3Q"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ 1-40 to Fines creek Exit, Turn Right, Go 0.1 miles, Turn Right and
go ).5 miles to Farm)
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone:
On-site representative Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector: VwaW Rams , J Phone:
Inspector Signature:"� Date:�L1l C)
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The facility appeared to be well maintained and the record keeping was in good order.
Waste analysis: 4121/09 ALD Irrigation N=.54 Ibs11000 gal
SSD Broadcast N=3.0Ibs/ton
9129109 ALD Irrigation N=.77 1bs/1000 gal
SSD Broadcast N=2.4lbs/ton
Soils analysis: 3112109
Page_ 1

i
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
inspection Date: 1 212 2/2 00 9 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
• t
Facility Number : 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 150 109
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Dry Stack 02 01/01/49
aste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 30.00
Page: 2

' • •
Permit: AM440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/2212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1 _ Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ f]
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ MOD
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ A ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure pian?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0 ■ ❑
❑
9. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑
❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

10
Permit: AWC440036 Owner- Facility: Randall S Parkins
Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12122/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Q
Is PAN > 10°/x110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crap Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ Q Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

I
Permit: AWC440036 owner - Facility: Randall 5 Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12122/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑ .
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25_ Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or GAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■ ❑ 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■ ❑ Q
Quality representative immediately_
Page: 5

0 0
Permit: AVVC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number. 440036
Inspoction Date: 12/2212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? OMOD
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6
L

o=0F w A rF9 pG
r
Mr. Randall Parkins
Parkins Brothers Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Dear Mr, Parkins:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
s i ` William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
U Forth Carolina Deparnrrent of Fmlimnrvent and \areal Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
November 24, 2008
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Parkins Brothers Dairy — Facility ## 44-36
Haywood County
On November 12, 2008, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for Parkins Brothers Dairy.
The facility appears to be well maintained and the records were in good order. Please refer to the
attached inspection report for additional concemslcomments.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and I appreciate your assistance during the inspection. I
have enclosed the combination IRR1- 2 and calibration forms for your convenience. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road Ste, 203
Waynesville, NC. 28786 wlenclosure
Joe Hudyncia, Division of Soil & Water Winston-Salem Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
;v9dCarolina
urally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality—Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Intemet h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equai OpporhutitylAff rmative Action Employer - 5W Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

r •
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440036 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWC440036 L! Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routin2 County: Hj ood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 11!1212008 Entry Time: 11700 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Parkins Brolhersi Owner Email:
Phone:428_62F 64P
3N2-c,�s
Mailing Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd _ _ _ Clyde NC 28721
Physical Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd __ Clyde NC 28721 _
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°40'10" Longitude: 82°58'30"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 ( 1-40 to Fines creek Exit, Tum Right, Go 0.1 miles, Turn Right and
go ).5 miles to Farm)
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Randall S Parkins Operator Certification Number: 21350
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins
Title
Phone:
Phone
On-site representative Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price _ Phone: �" X94- 169
Inspector Signature: !rV � Date: I/1�! lok
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
21, 11/21/07 ALD N=.61 ib/1000 gal. Irrg., SSD N=3.3Ibtton Broadcast;
414108 ALD N=.80 lb/i000 gal Irrg_, SSD N=3.1 lb/ton Broadcast, Waste analysis also collected 1118108
24. 513106 -Spreader calibrated (calibration due) 10/07 -irrigation calibration
The WUP has been updated however the Waste Utilization Table does not show the small grain rotation. Haywood Soil & Water will
update the WUP to include small grains.
Farm and records appear to be well maintained.
Page: 1

Permit: AAC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036 .
Inspection Date: 11/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 350 109
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
r Stack 02 01/01/49
aste Pond 01 01/01/91 30.00 33,00
Page: 2

V,
a
0
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall 5 Parkins Facility Number : 440035
Inspection Date: 11/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar es & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application f=ield ❑
Other - ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑
v
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
®
❑
2_ is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
®
Q
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
14. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
i
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
Inspection hate: 11/1212008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 ibs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Q
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (flay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
❑
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
0000
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Plan(CAWMP)?
Soil Type 1
Cuilowhee
Soil Type 2
Whiteoak cobbly loam,
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
15 to 30% slopes,
Soil Type 3
Brasstown-Junaluska
❑
complex, 30 to 50% s
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4
r

0 0
Permit: AWC44DO36 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility
Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 1 111 2200 8 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
® ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ® ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ® ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ 0 ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
%! ® ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
E 0 ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

•
•
Permit: AWC440036 Owner -f=acility: Randall S Parkins
Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 11/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately_
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
M
Cl
Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
Cl
❑
Page: 6

•
• G— 3
0
E Division of Water Quality �v
❑ Division of Soll and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440036 Facility Status: Artive Permit: 6WC440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: QompliInce InADectionInactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region. Asheville
Date of Visit: 11/121200B Entry Time; 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM incident 0:
Farm Name: Parkias Drothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Randall S Parkins Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd _ Clyde NC 28721
Physical Address: 1312 DO_C_Gr_aham Rd I Cede NC 28721
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°40'10" Longitude: 62"58'30"
Panth r Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ 1-40 to Fines creek Exit, Turn Right, Go 0.1 miles, Tum Right and
go miles to Farm]
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts jj Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents jj Other Issues
Certified Operator: Randall S Parkins Operator Certification Number. 21360
Secondary OIC(s)-.
Onsite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone:
On-site representative Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary: l (� + P
r A4 W
v vw � S (,)
11
All�S
¢ Z o�ir
; (rt f A j �"t�' —7tD
eutu."'(7)
511 �j
`� ` { CO:� ;o [,4l • YO rnnl' Page: I
wO - �
n�o� tJ i;4 r n

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
Inspection Date: 11112!2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Structures
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Tvne Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Dry Stack
02
01101149
A�:Narl��
aste Pond
01
01101!91
►/
10)
A cv,�
Page; 2

r
Permit AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 44003$
Inspection Data: 11112/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ V
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑
W ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
IF ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
W ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ P
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ Y]
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &-treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
❑
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ �fJ
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ 000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance attematives that need maintenance or
❑ 0
❑ ❑
improvement?
11_ Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ R
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Ll
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
Inspection tate: 11112/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN i 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1 ttSCIA. �IAZ
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3 i co V .t% r
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
•
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
jI
❑
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)? W �kY` w'r'j-a�'WL/L10Wd t^r`
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
130110
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0
❑
❑
18. 1s there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?c IS m-$ w"y-\ A -J
Ir11�t�C
13U0
❑
❑
-!
-
Records and Documents 1y`Ou t+p( y� a t�LA Yes
M
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? fl
Page: 4

Permit, AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 11/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Q
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 1P ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? SLb- I SLD- z OK Ifs -Z
❑
}
120 Minute inspections? dK
❑
Weather code? ®�
❑
Weekly Freeboard? t`
❑
Transfers? N
❑
Rainfall? G�--
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? OKE
3.3 i �� AC �
❑
fps— Sa��c
lrF:c . • 550 1.1= v
Waste Analysis? IkJ21 I()-) A� O - (a i ib)i000 g+l. J j "!t°
❑ col!tc�coQ
II
Annual soil analysis? '316$ DQ
❑
Crop yields? Du-
❑
Stocking?4'
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ p ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ � ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 43100 --Y
❑ E ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? Nei t) W-
❑ ❑ 5� ❑
ARtn
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ V ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
❑ X ❑ ❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates? togkAt
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

0 •
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins facility Number : 440036
Inspection Date: 11/12/2008 Inspection Type: compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
V.. un MA NF
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? D 0 C1
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? Q ❑ 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ 0
Page: 6
0 - -

A�E9 Y Michael F. Easley, Governor
l�_ A y�� Il 1j 1f William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
U} r v \1 II11 #I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Coleen 11. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 20, 2007
Mr. Randall Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Earl Parkins & Sons – f=acility # 44-36
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Parkins:
On December 3, 2007, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling system
for Earl Parkins & Sons.
The facility appears to be well maintained and the records were in good order. Please refer to the
attached inspection report for additional concerns/comments.
It is my understanding that the Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District has revised you waste
plan and you have applied for a permit.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and I appreciate your assistance during the inspection. If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
C " V'1,4—
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers/Duane Van Hook Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589
Racoon Road Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Piles ARO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.encstate.nc.us
An Equal OppottunitylAt;rmative Action Employer— 50%Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
1vo�Carolirra
Phont (82 8) 296-4500
FAX [phone]

A
6 6
Division of Water Quality
F1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC44Q036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12Q3/2007 Entry Time: (71 00 PM Exit Time: 02'3Q PM Incident ##:
Farm Name: Parkins Brothers Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Randall S Parkins
Mailing Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd Clyde NC 28721
Physical Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd Clyde NC 28721
Facility Status: n Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: 828-627-§12(
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°40'10" Longitude: 8' '
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 [ t-40 to Fines creek Exit, Turn Right, Go 0.1 miles, Turn Right and
go ).5 miles to Farm]
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Randall S Parkins
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other issues
Operator Certification Number: 21360
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone:
On-site representative Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins
Facility Number : 440036
Inspection Date: 12/03/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively cenified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
V..
Nn
N6
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0000
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

M
•
•
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randatl 5 Parkins Facility Number : 440036
Inspection Date: 12103/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31_ Diff the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? Cl ■ Irl n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? n ■ n n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

0
0
N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440036 — Facility Status: Active Permit AWC44=6 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection _ inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit Routine _ _ County: t1a ood _ Region: Asheville _
Date of Vosit: .12/03/2007 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Earl Parkins & apns
Owner: Randall &P-arkins
Owner Email:
Phone: 7-6567
Mailing Address: 6434 Panther Creek Rd _ _ Clyde NC 287,?1
Physical Address: 1312 DOC Graham Rd Clyde NC 28721
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°40'10" Longitude: B' 0"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Randall S Parkins
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Otherissues
Operator Certification Humber. 21360
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Randy Parkins Phone:
On-site representative Randy Parkins Phone:
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
C..r ( K•�.� 1)
Page: 1

0 0
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/0312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
'Zolz D o'-\
,1%1ZLY--.) 1,0
i 1 `'z i ` 0'1
�S ,p
Q fL
cx
�tvct�
N =
12
v-
5 Sp
C-4ant-
C1C, I,b ,,,A ,- --, ,,i
5©1r r]5 pec a�J��
Page: 2

Vl.
i
C�
Permit AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/03/2007 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Discharges & Stream Irn acts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0) ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ @ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ 41) ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
P ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (1_e-/ large t s, severe
❑
® ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)? So S r� C�' 5 , w --<- ,' f-
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
Vii' ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
U ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
Q9 n
❑
improvement?
I I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 6 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

• 0
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number., 440036
Inspection Date: 1210312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
0
Outside of acceptable crop window?
171
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
rl
Crop Type 1 c v f r-, 5 C-
v
Crop Type 2 t1 ��,-r 'A- C
Crop Type 3 (Yti ; u 2U r C' 5 p c. 51�
!
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
[l CIS 0
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Rl Ej
0
/
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
V 0 ❑ n
El
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
04 E)
0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n 5 Q
n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
w ❑ n
0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n 0 ❑
❑
If yes, check t appropriate box below.
%W -1.7
❑
Page: 4

• 0
Permit AM440036 Owner - Facility: Randall S Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/0312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ✓ ❑
Design? I/ ❑
Maps? ✓ ❑
Other? ✓ ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? I/
❑
120 Minute inspection ✓
C3s?
Weather code? V/
❑
❑
Weekly Freeboard? ✓
1
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall? ✓
❑
J
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
❑
Waste Analysis? '—/
Annual soil analysis? 'J
❑
Crop yields? ✓ .
❑
Stocking? ' /
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? 'A
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
@9 Cl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
@
❑ ❑
25_ Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
@ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 'L 1 xj (.P D
❑
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
Ift ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
(h
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
11
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
0
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

0 •
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Randall 5 Parkins
Inspection Date: 1210312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
11La❑n
1:1®0n
❑rgon❑
Page: 6

A
7
DlUa-
5
Mr. Randall Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Dear Mr. Parkins:
0
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
FILE COPY Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 11, 2006
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Earl Parkins & Sons -- Facility # 44-36
Haywood County
On December 1, 2006, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling system
for Earl Parkins & Sons. Your facility is certified but not permitted.
It is my understanding that the Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) is revising
your waste plan_ Once the waste plan is completed you may submit a permit application. I encourage
you to submit this application as soon as possible as you are operating without a permit.
Even though you are not yet permitted, you are doing a good job with your waste application records and
your facility appears to be well maintained.
One area of concern noted during the inspection is in regard to your waste holding pond. There is an
excessive amount of grass growing within the pond. As a result, it appears that the volume has been
greatly reduced. I would recommend that you contact Jeff Young with the NC Division of Soil & Water or
Leslie Smathers with Haywood SWCD for guidance on how to proceed with vegetation removal. Please
refer to the attached inspection report for additional concerns/comments.
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and I appreciate your assistance during the inspection. If
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
vV�
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers/Duane Van Hook Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589
Racoon Road Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO,
Jeff Young Division of Soil & Water ARO
NonhGtrolina
�Vrrtura!!j
Nortb Carolina Division of Water Quality- Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6749
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc,us
An Equal Cpportun' /Aiftnnalive Action Employer- 50%Recyciedli0% Post Consumer Paper

•
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440036 Facility Status: Actin Permit: AWC440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Complianre Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: —Haywood Region: Asheville_
Date of Visit: 12101/2006 Entry Time: 7Q 00 AM Exit Time: 11-00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Ead_Parkins & Sons _ Owner Email:
Owner: Earl Parkins
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6434 Panther Creek Rd Clyde NC 28721
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40
Integrator:
Latitude: 35'40'10" Longitude: 82°58'30"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment W Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Randall 5 Parkins
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name
Operator Certification Number: 21360
Title
Primary inspector: E 10
,Williams' Phone:
i ��v'/��---
Inspector Signature: Date: _ Y
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone
Page: 1

•
•
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number : 440036
Inspection bate: 12/0112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The records and facility appear to be well maintained even though the facility is not yet permitted.
7. The volume in the waste pond appears to be decreased due to an excess amount of grasslweeds.
This was addressed in the 2005 inspection and no action has been taken to fix the problem.
19 & 20. The facility is not permitted. The waste plan is being re -written by the Haywood County Soil and Water. Permit application
should be submitted as soon as the waste plan is complete.
Waste application has been calibrated, but documentation and figures for the irrigation equipment need to be presented at next
inspection.
Waste pond freeboard was 38".
Waste analysis: 3/27/2006 ALD irrigation N= 0.72 Ibs11000 gal SSD broadcast N=2.1 Ibslton
9/8/2006 LSD irrigation N= 0.62 Ibs11000 gal SSD broadcast N=2.7 Ibstton
soil incorp N=3.7 lbs/ton
Soils analysis: 2/15/2006
Page: 2

Permit: AWC440036
•
Owner -Facility: Eart Parkins
•
Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Co, 110 99
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
110
154,000
Page: 3

0 •
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ n 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n ■ n n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ■ n n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
1:1
El
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
n
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
n
n
■
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
n
n
■
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 4

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins
Inspection Date: 12101/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total P2O5?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
D
Evidence of wind drift?
D
Application outside of application area?
D
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 4
Crap Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
D ■ Q ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
D ■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? D ■ n 0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D ■ 0 0
18_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D ■ n n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ D 0 C1
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■ D 0 !3
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
■
Page: 5

0 i
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number : 440036
Inspection Data: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ■
Design?
■
Maps?
■
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
(n
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
f]
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
(n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Stacking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
rl
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n n
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
❑ n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Q
❑
■ n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■ n
Other issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
[1
■
n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
D n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

• •
Permit: AVVC440036 Owner -Facility, Earl Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 1210112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Ybsit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? i=i ■ 0
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ 0 D
33. Does fatality require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 44QQ30 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit Routine County: H@ywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/01/2006 Entry Time:1 g:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #: _
Farm Name: Earl Parkins & $ons Owner Email:
Owner: Earl Parking Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6434 Panther Creek fid Clyde
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40
Integrator:
Latitude: Z5140'10" longitude: 82°58'30"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Randall S Parkins
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representattve(s): Name
Operator Certification Number: 21360
Title
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
C>
Sad g a�r,o.1• s;s '. Zj 1 -S17-0v,
317-1 170 ®(o
i p sz W G. -1 Z
Phone
1 1s ) 160 0 ".J .
1 6,5 1 f5,--, Page: 1
�nccrP NJ
3�1
Phone
1 1s ) 160 0 ".J .
1 6,5 1 f5,--, Page: 1

Permit: AWC440036 Owner -Facility: Earl Parkins
Inspectlon hate: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
-1+ o �F Codas 2
1' U f.J r�v eaboar A
) ,i
Facility Number : 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Permtt: AWC440035 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 9 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 9) ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ U ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ q0 ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ � ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the stryctures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ®❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)? g� � Or, -P- f a>S ? o--
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ fA ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures tacit adequate markers as required by the permit? (trot applicable to roofed pits, ❑ El ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ 0 ❑ D
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ 000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ �.
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

0 i
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Evidence of wind drift?
Cl
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 COC 514 V
Yes
Crop Type 21S rrj C. t�Vtf 1
NA
Crop Type 3 v\at'
`
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? SA; `+
Crop Type 4
❑
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
1. rn
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?K-
Soil Type 3
❑
Soil Type 4
❑
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ❑ ❑ n
Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
12 ❑
Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
f1
9
n
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
119
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
`
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? SA; `+
� g
❑
Q
1. rn
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?K-
R
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
19
Page: 4

Permit: A1NC440036 owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number : 440036
Inspection Date: 1210112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
Maps?
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below-
Waste aAppplication? C�<< `�(
❑
120 Minute inspections? c o
d�f\
`tea ��A , n V OS _ n a roc � eJ
n
Weather code? Vic �
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
]
Transfers? it - l A
❑
Rainfall? D 1LO)
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? C7
❑
Waste Analysis? bic '
❑
Annual soil analysis? DIC
n
Crop yields? 01C a.l
❑
Stocking? lc�-- 0
n
1
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? N 1
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
a ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
Cl OU ❑
24. Did the faci'ty fail to calibr to waste application eq pment as required by, the �e�r�tit? 1
S[k^eo,�c}}t� 5 0� c, i fir;;9r p c� v=u da�A 1j r� i�S'A W,o�,
n
ti V�
. �
y
❑
Q ® ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fait to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
W ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ Le ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
to ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those
❑
1E Cl ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
® ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

0 0
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins
Inspection Date: 12/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 440436
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
D @
D
Q
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
D 0
D
Cl
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
D I
D
D
Page: 6

t 2O� w A r�9p • ESI' ' '' ' • Michael F_ Easley, Governor
r i i t.
- : 'i ` William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Dcpartrnent of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Alan W. Klimek, P.F- Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 28, 2005
Mr. Randall Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721 .
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Earl Parkins & Sons — Facility #f 44-36
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Parkins:
On December 20, 2005, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for Earl Parkins & Sons. Your facility is certified but not permitted.
It is my understanding that the Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) is
revising your waste plan. Once the waste plan is completed you may submit a permit
application. I encourage you to submit this application as soon as possible as you are operating
without a permit. You also indicated during the inspection that you would like to be permitted for
150 head. Your current certification is for 110 head. You may not operate above your current
design without revising the waste plan. I would recommend contacting your technical specialist
if you decide to go above the current design capacity.
Even though you are not yet permitted, you are doing a good job with your waste application
records. There will be additional record keeping requirements when your permit is issued.
Please refer to the inspection report for a list of items that will require documentation. The
approved reporting forms can' be found at the following address:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndceu/Animal/StateGeneralPermitForms.xls In addition, your permit
will require calibration of your waste application equipment. It is recommended that you contact
the Haywood County SWCD for assistance with calibration.
One area of concern noted during the inspection is in regard to your waste holding pond. There
is an excessive amount of grass growing within the pond. As a result, it appears that the
volume has been greatly reduced. I would recommend that you contact Jeff Young with the NC
Division of Soil & Water or Leslie Smathers with Haywood SWCD for guidance on how to
proceed with vegetation removal.
lv Caxo��' tto
�tura!!f
North Carolina Division of Hater Quality - Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
lrttemet h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitidAftmi ve Action Empiayer- 50% Recyciedl10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Parkins • •
December 28, 2005
Page 2
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me and l appreciate your assistance during the
inspection. I have enclosed a permit application for your convenience. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers/Duane Van Hook Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District
589 Racoon Road Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
.teff Young Division of Soil & Water ARO

J
Division of Water Quality
f� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440036 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWG440036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 1212012p _ Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: 01:40 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Earl PIrkins & Sons _ Owner Email:
Owner: Earl Parkins Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6434 Panther Creek Rd Clyde NC 28721
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°40'10" Longitude: !iz_95 '50"
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Randall S Parkins
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Operator Certification Number: 21360
Title
Phone
Phone:
Date: /-7 8- p
Page. 1

•
•
Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number, 440036
Inspection Date: 12/20/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis 2121105 ALD N=0.66lb/1000 gal./, SSD N=2.3 Ibtton B;
7113105 ALD N=0.27 lb/1000 gal. I
11/15/05 ALD N=1.3 lb/1000 gal. I, SSD N= 2.2 Iblton B
Soils analysis dated 02104/05
7- Waste pond had lots of grass/weeds growing in the pond. Volume appeared to be decreased due to large amount of vegetation.
NC Division of Sail and Water and/or Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation should be contacted for guidance on how to remove
the vegetation.
19. & 20. The facility is not permitted. The waste plan is being rewritten by Haywood Co. Soil & Water. Permit application should be
submitted as soon as revised waste plan is complete.
21. Record keeping: in addition to the records that you are currently keeping, the following items will require documentation when
permitted 1) 120 minute spray irrigation inspections, 2) waste transfers, 3) waste pond inspections after a greater than one inch
rainfall & monthly, 4) crop yields, 5) monthly stacking records.
24. Waste application equipment will require calibration when permitted.
Mr. Parkins indicated he would like to be permitted for 150 head, current certification is for 110 head. The waste plan must be certified
for 150 head before expanding above 110.
Page: 2

Permit AVVC440036
Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins
Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/20/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 110 105
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
910
154,000
Page_ 3

0
•
Permit: AWC440038 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number. 440436
Inspection Date: 12/20/2005 lnspectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit, Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
M ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
❑
■
`l
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes„ notify DWQ)
❑
❑
0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Cl
O
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
Cl
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0
■
El
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit. AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins Facility Number: 440036
Inspection Date: 12/20/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > iO%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 1111110
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ■
Page: 5

Permit: AWC440036 Owner - Facility: Earl Parkins
Inspection Date: 12/20/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 440036
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
■
Design?
■
Maps?
■
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
■
Weather code?
■
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
■
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
0
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Farm (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
Cl
■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27_ Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No
AIA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those
❑
■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑ Q
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWC440036
Owner -Facility: Earl Parkins
Facility Number. 440036
Inspection Date: 12/20/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ 0 11
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss reviewfinsAection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ONOO
13 ■ Cl ❑
Page: 7

\N AT ERQG •
o -c
Earl Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, NC 28721
. Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 3, 2004
RE: Permit application for Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
Facility -9 44-36
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT 4 7003-1010.0001-2611 4810
-
�iL;l
DEC 2D MA
Dear Mr. Parkins:��
'",POU.-1:Cf14'.ATH, SEC1i ;- i
You are hereby notified that the Earl Parkins & Sons Dai c -,� t F ' C—,;- "Us `a it.� ,
y Dairy, in accordance with G.S.��143=_ 15:�I�C; must->3pp#y-for=
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to
submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session
Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the
date specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your
application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste
Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make
corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one
Z1 -
copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan must be returned to complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the
following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
Keith Larick
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call me at [phone] or Bev Price of the
Asheville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
4) '
Keith Larick
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Asheville Regional Office (w/o encl.) ow
!�o Carolina
�a
turall
North Carolina Division of water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50°% Recycled110°% Post Consumer Paper

T!ui`.� .,:3`t.z -.,�i• Ian of Water Quaht� _ _ r:r __� s _,..
� �` � � �.�� � � x'.� Q �IE7stoo ai>Sntland Water.�Conselva'tson � ; � f�`--��.•"�".
-
s. m., s• c�.s4: ,`k„r�a����m d,"'a _.._E .k. .r 'S:'��i r€'.i"s`;;xz .�i:",r-.,m�-..:u. 'P'3s�.'i'�5.,:°�-gym ,..., _�.. Zr, sr��? s?�L' ii'.�. a a� � °:*�sn'S
Type. of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Nofitication O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 44 3G Date of Visit: 385/2004 Time: 1000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
©Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [:]Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Ear.I.karkim.&SQU............................ County: Haymeotd.......................................... ARO ............
OwnerName: Earl .......................................... 1'at:WxiS................ _..................................... Phone No: ($X81.6.17-1SSb7................................. ......................
Mailing address: k .JraRtkectr.Gerjmti.E.4ad............................................................ Cbft—NK.......................................... ................... ZBOU ..............
Facility Contact: S.ye.karkinf .................................................. Title: owixer......... ........................................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: te�tK.Qt.�a X p�....... Integrator:
Certified Operator:Ratlld&S.............................. ra1Gl{iln5............................................. Operator Certification Number:2,X3{0.............................
Location of Farm:
anther Creek off Fines Creel: Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 AL
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 40 1 10 " Longitude 1 82 10 SS 30
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number. of:Lagoons
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obsertied. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Design Current
Design Current
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ No
® Dairy
110 120
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
j 110
Total SSLW
154,000
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obsertied. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4_ Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .......msti---pend......
Freeboard (inches): 24
12111103
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Continued

d>iSacilVy Number: 4-4-36 • Date of Inspection 3/25/2004 •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or ensironmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes N No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Fescue (Graze) Com (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application.? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Co�nents,'(refer to question #) Eaplaru any YES a[iswers analor any recommeudations:or any other conments s
=Usewings of facility to better explata stfaattons: (use addrttonal pages asinecessary) 10Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
- j r
Design capacity is incorrect on the form. Records were not evaluated during the inspection as Mr. Randy Parkins was milking at the
•
time. Waste from the drystack was being land applied during this visit. Waste from the pond was to be land applied within a week.
-- t•.
sl
Reviewer/Inspector Name Bev Price � ' a ;3 ' Keith:Haynes � 3_ _ '�, ' ;` r : j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/12103 Continued

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
NGchael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Alan lGimek, F.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
%.
�••
Elk
NCDENFZ
rraRn-, c.►,:ouK^ of
F-N"R0"M1U4r .wn N.4t"w
WATER QUALM SECTION
Mr. Earl Parkins
Earl Parkins & sons Dairy
6434 Panther creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
October 4, 2002
subject: Animal operation inspection
Earl Parkins & sons Dairy
Facility Number 44 - 36
Haywood county
Dear mr. Parkins:
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the Inspection Report for
the routine on-site inspection of your animal operation for the 2002
inspection year.
zf you have any questions concerning the Report or any related
matters, pl easedo not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208. The
assistance provided by Mandy and Steve during the inspection was
greatly appreciated.
si a3r,,V,
D. Keith Hay es
Environmental Specialist
xc: Haywood soil & water
44-36_02
59 Woodfn Plea, Ashev86e Nath Carman 28801 Tekphone 828-251.6= FAX VA -251-6452
. sa _.—_t lL__y—y. a!C_�—a___ • mss__ f,—_��__ !M/ __�f_le�AOI ,_,—� r��LL���--�

1�
Type otVisit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
[:::Faeffity Number 44 36 Date of Visit: 9l24R002 Thne: 1045
O Not erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted M CertiFed 13 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: -- ......................
Farm Name: EAdJ!xddmA.$9= ...... _....... ...... _... ._...._ ......_w .................... County: HAW%d..................................._...... -- -
Owner Name: Ead............. _................... ...... Palddal....................... ___ ........ ......... Phone No:($2H).b2I_i%z... ._..... .....................
�......._._.
Marling Address: 6.44_P.an*ear.CrcrkRoad.............................................................. 28721 .......... --
FacilityContact: ._... _........ Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...............
Onsite Representative: Ran y-ftr iuL............... -.............. Integrator: ...................................... ...... ... ....... _. ............... _
CertiFed Operator: Ban tdWIS ...... ........................ Parldw ...............................»............ Operator Cerdflcation Number: 1.��iQ.� .. ...._.,...... ,_
Location of Farm:
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 •F 40 10 Longitude 82 ` ! ss E- F36 -1 -
Wean
36i"
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes H No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier...... waste-gond.-----...-----.........................
Freeboard (inches): ..... ......... 24 ............ --
n vn yin r rnul:,.u.v1

Facility Number: 44-36 • Date of Inspection 9R4R002 S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion,
. ❑Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not proper-ly addressed andfor managed through a waste management or
closure plan?(D, any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑Yes ®No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8" Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancefimprovewcoi? ❑ Yes 19 No
9. Do any stuctiires lack adequate, gauged markers with required mammum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintmancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
IL is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes R No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Graze)
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? (] Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Require! Records & Documents
17" Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18" Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Cj3 Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes CR No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. i
:.'
O... u1v+.} FAY r-
NLT-Co`K..ti.�".e�Vrs•G.~CS 4 i'�"�"
T�,i�t
�
OField Copy ti0.w.❑... Final
❑+.X
u� NS �tei r,�a�ta
syr-ki:a.:.:`.y`y:>`�y}- '4\ +:5.;'i �: � Chi
.y.•.:c-i.: :: :� -- i _ 1 � {�
S
Haywood Soil & Water has yet to provide the dairy with a CAWMP. The design capacity on the DWQ database is incorrect. Waste will
irrigated from the waste pond. Record keeping is adequate, however, a log on the waste pond level should be added
.:-:F.=: +,n5:w::a :.:.\•.+ .v..}:.ni:4x:.- u?F , ,..sh}T:'2.m m}wr
,..A.:S
Reviewer/Inspector Name lf)E#a `�
"!
Reviewer/Impector Signature: Date: •
05103101 1

l
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
0 IT44 0 A
NCDENR
ENVIRC7NME.KT AWS Na7URA1_ RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 7, 2001
Mr. Earl Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
subject: Animal Operation Inspection
Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
Facility Number 44 - 36
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Parkins:
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the Inspection Report for
the routine on-site inspection of your animal operation for the 2001
inspection year.
Please remember that you should keep records of all applications,
as well as the analyses of the manure and the soils. I am planning to
organize a training session for record keeping sometime in December.
You, as well as other Haywood County dairymen will be informed of the
date and location
If you have any questions concerning the Report or any related
matters, please do not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208. The
assistance provided by Randy and Steve during the inspection was
greatly appreciated.
Sincer 1 ,
D. Keith Ha es
Environmental Specialist
xc: Haywood Soil & water
44-36.1et
59 Woodlin Place, AsbeviIIe North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX 828-251-"52
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% reeycled/10% post -consumer paper

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Ca Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: iQ/25/200I Time: Q930 Printed on: 11/2/2001
44 36
Q iVot O erational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Faint Name: ,7rL1'arms.. c..SQ[................ ........ ........................................ County: T al'7. o -d .......................................... EURO.......__...
Owner Name: E;Ar-I.......................................... karkims.... _........................................ _....... Phone No: _.....__......._
Mailing address: � 4.kanlh x. lClz�lf,_RQ;Id.............. _.............................................. clydk... G............_._.............._............................----- U7.11 -------.......
Facilitv Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Randy..amst.Steye..l'alrkjW..................................................... Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator:,Ra]Rlloll.,S,............................ fair ns-.____..____.__._........................... P
. Operator Certification Number:,ZI.3.6.0 ..................
Location of Farm:
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 +
f�
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude � 82 • _ 58—' 3U u
Design Current
Swine C'anneity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ® Dairy 110 110
❑Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
e M
❑ Other I I I it
Total Design Capacity 110
Total SSLW 154,000
llumber;of Lagoons _ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
-:
Holding P66ds / Solid Traps. 2 - ° _ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ar"
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [-]Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flogs• in gaUrni.n'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure =4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... W_=e.pond----- -------- dEy.stack........ ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 36 36
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 1-36 Date of Inspection 10/'15/2-001 • Printed on: 11/2/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ye& and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/irnprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required nlwdnunn and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aoolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14- a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ inigat`on, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
' 3Es-si`aC-rgus--�-^E -�.� .»- x_c �
outments'{re er fo-queslton, Explain Y]'Bsansvversand/orj-any>recomit�n"tions or
:.��.iZ,�- n-1� .�� a +��:-.�i._�i-.��..�.•
�[ sesdrratvtngsiof facmi _y tbt€ fte, �e�aplain sitita� adam nalt age�?necessa�ryv: W Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
18&19) As with most dairies in Haywood County the Parkins have not received their A WIMfP from the local soil & water office. Record
keeping is minimal. The Parkins have requested assistance in proper record keeping.
The dairy appeared to be well maintained, with the Parkins being willing to do what is necessary to stay in compliance.
rr
Reviewer/inspector Nallne s �_ �' t , w
D Kelih Haynes r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103/01
Continued

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural ResourcesA4
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
BM Holman, Secretary
NCDENR
KT. Stevens, Director
NcfrrH GAtouKA Dm -AR mEw of
�err
Divlslon of Water Quality
ErrnRoNMENT Amr> NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 15, 2000
Mr. Earl Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Animal Operation Inspection
Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
Facility Number 44 - 36
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Parkins:
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the Inspection Report for
the routine on-site inspection of your animal operation. The
inspection was conducted on October 11, 2000.
Please remember that you should keep records of all applications,
as well as the analyses of the manure and the soils. Also note that a
liquid level marker must be added to your waste pond.
If you have any quest ions
matters, please do not hesitate
assistance provided by you and
greatly appreciated.
xc: Haywood Soil & Water
44-36. let
concerning the Report or any related
to contact me at 251-6208. The
your sons during the inspection was
Sincerely,
D. Keith Hay s
Environmental Specialist
59 Wood$n Place, Asheville North Carolina 1.8801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

a+r�`�:-.��;;•n.ea;.uid«�:?;L:u",w`:S:",�:=."v,`ro��?3?�3f3'%i't \�r�.-,+M;nxk`i�.a�'.�5; aawr...�.ti:;`.i7��i3:,`•z=?:�^r::.'J"„�;.»s`.`N3i2;'r'.sa:-o'avhc'. sc^.:.: :Y?'fi�.i�I �
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Folow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
=Facility Number 44 Date of visit: laI 1fZ[ioQ Time: l03o Printed on: 1011912000
Q Nat O erational Q Below Threshold
©Permitted E Certffied [3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name: FFA.&.Sorra........................... ..... ..... .. County: Haffffld•.........� .................. AW............
Owner Name: I ... .... Prima _ ... _• . Phone No: (M).UTA500._
Facility Contact: _ _ . _... ......._.-Title. Phone No:...___
Mailing Address: f434 C—tr Raad ---^_. _ _.--�._._ ..._ L dr LYC_. ..�___._,_ ._....�_..--••----- 28721--_
Onsite Representative: 9ltsrxr;.8B&R=ft.Znrkbis_ _.. Integrator•
CertMed Operator. HandsH Operator Certification Number: 21361 ----
Location of Farm:
Panther Creek off Fines Creek Rd. at 15 mile exit of interstate 40 +
T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • ®6 10 Longitude 82 •
� r
k +et<
jFE�IFEeeder
Feeder❑LayerDairy
I 10 I20
`'
❑Nan -Layer
'
Finish
❑Non -Dairy
❑arrow to Wean
::..
`
Tiaga 110
❑ Farrow to FeederOther
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑Gilts
.
`'
Z'#5 154,000
❑Boars
u { Neer0 ❑ SubsurfaceDrains Present❑ Lagoon Arc10 Spray PSeid Area
s
Loidurg..ds spa 1 ' ❑ No Lquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Facts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c_ If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow m galhnm9
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Cotkction & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier
Freeboard (inches): ....... .....
..�Ea ...........----- .. 3i�..�...M ...... .. _....
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6

1J !
(iJ Facility Number. a4 -3b . Date of Inspection 1Q/118000 Printed on: 10/1 WOOO
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
[] Yes 0 No
secpage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site whim are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental thrwd, rectify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancefmzprovement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste strucirrm require maintenanee/impruvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, ganged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 19 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a Jack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(icl discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23_ Did Reviewcrllnspector fail to discuss rrvicwrmspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
n Yes N No
0 Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
N Yes [I No
® Yes 0 No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
[] Yes N No
❑ Yea ® No
] Yes ® No
j] Yes ® No
a'o>cis: gtr:t�ieftttiegeites �v e:tgote�:dniu�g ins visit:: X.......
..... . . . . .
: da rep dencx abou' t* ihis.visiti::.:::::::.::: . .
, aCS
.9w .Lx,E`?_._`+_•.i`T..h}fii�<h
^.�.....
y�y,a'...iltS1i,x,\t
h.�}Nk.ji>'k hq: .}K��.`.F.�N,.,C..._.,`?Y`�.` ..J
>,v..> : :: <at`.n'..`..Yir_- .4s.}µh.va♦ '-- .:ott-,}.7,_:c.?a.>. .:H. .�, c:T",r)7�::.�
E';Y}}yC:U;YyCun�i�
`.`:w'�S"- .ryi
'.->q.,.[
Crcv.y�
-?
i-:':�i,.a'..
-...Mr
.i.i.;}
The dairy needs to get the CAWMP fiDm Haywood Soil & Water. A level marker needs to be installed in the waste pond The operator
needs assistance in record keeping. The waste management system is adequately operated and maintained It should be noted that the
ign capacity on the database is incorrect.
H
Reviewer/Inspector Name �- �-ty,., �;
,, • : >z> :..,,��
Revkwer/inspector Signature: Date: t r 4 •Da S✓00

• -�v NORTI*ROLINA DEPART EN W OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 11, 2000
Huwrjw.
Mr. Earl Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Subject: Animal Operation Inspection
Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
Facility Number 44--36
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Parkins:
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the Inspection
Report for the routine on-site inspection of your animal
operation. The inspection was* conducted on December 2,
1999.
It is my understanding that your dairy was just
recently certified by Mr. Jeff Young. Your work toward
installation and implementation of your animal waste
management system is greatly appreciated. Please remember
that once you have initiated application of animal waste,
you should keep records of all applications, as well as the
analyses of the manure and the soils.
If you have any questions concerning the Report or any
related matters, please do not hesitate to contact me at
251-6208.
Sincerely _
D. Keith Haynes.
Environmental 3peci alist
xc: Haywood Soil & Water
INTERCHANpE BUILDING, 59 WGOOFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE. NC ZBBO1-2416
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

1
19 Routine O Complaint 0 Foilow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 44 36 Date of Inspection 1212!99
Time of Inspection 1000 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted [j Certified (] Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: EaAEa kln&A.Stoma.............................-........_........ .._-..»...... County: k>a,�r ..... ....... ............ ASS..........
Owner Name: Ead-•--------,------...._ _ .._ Parlcima _.. - _-_--• Phone No:—_-�-
FacilityContact: . - ... ..... »....... ... _.. ....-.. _. Title:. __......-,...... - _..._. _ ....._.- ... Phone No:........_ .................. �.. .
Mailing Address: 6434 wther-CtrakRuad- -- -- _ _-_..... ................ Cbrd�e..CYC....._.......... ..........
w.._.. --.......... zl_ ....._...
Onsite Representative: Fadj?.& dm......-._.... ..-. Integrator-
Certified
ntegratorCertded Operator. $andAll 5..........-- ----•-- Paz ns ---. _..... ---.. .. Operator Certification Number-
Location
umberLocation of Farm:
Latitude 3S • ®� IO K Longitude 82 • S8 30 K
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Wager of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from arty part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 9 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (fi=board plus storm storage) less than adequate7 ❑ Spillway 0 Yes C9 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Strucb= 5 Structure 6
Identifier_.ttts per....- _.-...dot staelc............. - -___W... _._....... ............ .................._...._ ... .... .... _..._._........
Freeboard (inches): ...._. i fl _.. . �5.._ . .
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on bark
Printed on 12/17/99
►,

FFaculty Number: 44-36 !R�
�f Inepec#ian
6. Are there struc�tures on-site which are noaddressed and/or managed tbnough a washmanagement or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 9 No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structturs need mamtenance/impruvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9_ Do any stiulures lack adequate, gauged maters with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aupfication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes CR No
❑ Yes CK No
13_ Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 19 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes H No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a tack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (e/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iet discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerl[nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No i ola vos: dr:d� >xcies 9v�[e:gt3tesd:d� g iS vii :: '�U erv�e �Q %....:
• � •C©1�eSfitlf�i�CDCB e�OUL 'tills• VLfi1t.' . . ' . . ' . ' . . ' . ' . . ' .
0 Yes 9 No
{] Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes p No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 19 No
0 Yes No
El Yes No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
dairy has just completed work toward compliance with the Special Agreement, therefore, record keeping, CAWMP and samples
lis are not on site.
A marker to indicate the "pump start levee' needs to be installed in the waste storage pond. Haywood Soil & Water should be able to
vide asciQxnce with placement.
Reviewer/Lupector
..F - .ac<,,y h tt - - e-- - _ ..c:r:::ra•<;� --z4- o-- 4 +e - --s Y. s<,..,,i -£ 's a� �i�S
r.
x
ReviewerAhspector Signature: Date: � • � ().
on 1

Facility Number. 44-36 D> Inspection 1212199
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 04 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 9 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 0 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) Yes Cg No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes CK No
:•:h`.:5.:...wh3[Y ..{. ..5i)``.:.F SH; :�:}v�: Y n] ti.rv.` , ,K,v :<F:.w.. F: "i:i:::Y
'.-:.:".'::......c .:..:. .:...::x..v:-.-... _:.::vxx..:r-...-.:.:.w..:: � ..:-.v:.:-..:.- _-.' .'::.-..�.r:??h::..xU:-:.v..?`!::..t:.nu-.-.-:.^`:.: �.:v-�-v� x.:.: 7�:.:�:n»:n:w:.'�.�.P.Ty-':...x.-:...::::v::.-.x:::�:^,�?,2�`i.:...w:.:+ry^q••:.:.-..W::.:..__.:::,:xx..cn.:....»v.,..:iv}:r.:>.:::.v...... 5....:x
Printed on 121/1199
Printed on 121/1199

I
State of North Carol
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Earl Parkins
Earl Parkins & Sons
6434 Panther Creek Road
Clyde NC 28721
Dear Earl Parkins:
vy
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEEIARTMENT OF
ENviRONMENr ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 V
JAN I
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 44-36
Haywood County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR 1, IRR -2, DRY 1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR 1, SLUR2,
SLD 1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Haywood County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
io An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyded/10% post -Consumer paper

16 Routine p Complaint p Follow-up ot DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 3��
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: M Registered p Applied for Permit
p Certified 13 Permitted
p Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Earl Perkins & Sons
County: Haywaad.......... ARD ...... ......
OwnerName: Earl ......................................... P.arkial....................................... .......... .... Phone No: 627-:b.0 .............. ..._...._.... ..-.............................
Facility Contact: Randy.f.Ark,ins.................................--....._Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: f433.Panthrx.C.reek Rasd......................................................... W Clyde �iG . - - - � 2$72,1 ........ ......
Onsite Representative: Rawky.P-arkins ......... .......... ......_............................... .... Integrator:
Certified Operator:Randy..................................... P.arkim........................... ......... ........ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude ®• ®° ®�
ype of Operation I Design Current -
Swine _` Capacity Poputation Poultry
t3 Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to m
❑ arrow to can
❑ Farrow to Fee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other -- ._.---
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
r
�y eon -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total-SSLW
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Number.. of Lagoons /rHolding Ponds 10 u sur ace Drains Present ❑goon rea 10 pray�rea
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes Cl No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) (3 Yes C] No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
4130197 Continued on back

act um r: 44_36
04)
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design. p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? D Yes ® No
Structures n and/or 14QIding Pond5)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Yes N No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
D Yes
H No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[]Yes
Ig No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
I& Yes
D No
Waste Appliotion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Gran.(&loge.&..Graia)................................Hay...................................... ........ Postai'it............................ .....
......................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
D Yes
D No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
O Yes
®No .
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
D Yes
® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
D Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
D Yes
® No
21. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
D Yes
® No
For Certified Facilities On]X
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
D Yes
D No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
D Yes
D No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
D Yes
❑ No
comments (reter to question-ff): tipiain.any Yra answers ancuor any:recommenaat:ons or any ower comments.
!Use drawings_ot facility to better explain situations. (use. additional pages as necessary):
l') There -is an area where cattle can enter the creek that runs through the property. This area will need to be fenced before the farm
can be properly certified.
13) A liquid level marker needs to be added.to the lagoon.
be feed lot is scrape and.haul with manure hauled daily, weather permitting.
Ukroom wash down water and feed lot runoff go into the lagoon; with liquid.from the lagoon passing through grass filter strips.
ira_ss filter strips are not a certifiable method of waste management. It is recommended that the local Soil and Water Office .be
facility is incorrectly listed with anon -dairy design capacity.
Reviewer/Inspector Name D_.Keith. ayues -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc.* Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4130197