440011_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Facility um er: 44_11
6. Is facility not in compliance with any a#cable setback criteria in effect at the time of d• ?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Cructur:s (Lq 2o -s P--P.LIj
9. Is storage capacity ( eebcard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
3
10. Is seepage observed from anv of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Structure 4
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste ApIjsatiott
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
0 Yes G No
p Yes Ig No
Structure 5 Stricture 6
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
® Yes ONO
® Yes ❑ No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type ......Gnx�a.(Stla� e.&.Graztt)._......._.......Suder(Ha,y) .._._..... SrxtalLfirain.�l hear..Bzrle�r........................ li cue....................
Milo ats)
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management p an (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes D No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Duality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

p Division of SoilWater Conservation p Other Ag
irDivision of Wat�uality
19 Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p ter
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
i Time of Inspection 24 ter. (blunt n)
Farm Status: N Registered p Applied for Permit
p Certified p Permitted
p Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm
County: HaYwoad.......................................... ARO............
OwnerName: Rnm.................................... .................... Phone No: 9,2lCr.2.4.(d....................... ............................ ...__...
Facility Contact: ....... .................................................... ......Title: .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: ZMAunaX.Runlane ........................................................................ 1b.'aynesville ... C............. 28.7.86 ..............
Onsite Representative: Dean.Ross.......................................... ............................... ........ Integrator:
Certified Operator: ...... . ........................................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude Longitude ®• ®s ®4
Type of Operation . Design t Current Desig>E Currents
Srvitie Cagac�ty Population .:Poultry._ Capacity' PopWhti Cat[Ie
❑
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to t-eederayer ® i)auy
C1ee er to - -
❑ arrow to
❑ Farrow to
❑ Farrow to
W C1Other
Number' j
r = - Total Design Capacity
` = Total SSLW�
as / Holding Ponds ° ^ ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ ago—on e
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ® Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30197
[]Yes ® No
Ig Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Ig No
❑ Yes ® No
I
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Cl No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on back

M--. H. i yea r.os s
October G, 1997
Rage Two
Thank you for your attention to this matter. if you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Haynes or me
at telephone [phone].
xc: Haywood Soil &
Haywood County
Keith Haynes
Wanda Frazier
Sincerely,
Roy �M.Dais, Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Water Office
Health Department

State of North Carolio
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 8, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RESTED
Mr. H. Dean Ross
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NCGS 143-215.1
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
The routine on-site inspection of your animal waste handling
system for your dairy farm was conducted on September 4, 1997 by
Mr. Keith Haynes of this Office. The investigation revealed one
area of concern that needs to be addressed in order to assure
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0200 Regulations administered by
this Division. A copy of Mr. Haynes inspection report is
attached for your records.
Specifically, wash -down water from the milk room is being
discharged into a small wet -weather ditch on your property. Even
though the discharge did not appear to be reaching surface waters
at the time of the inspection, this type of discharge does
constitute a violation of North Carolina General Statute (NCGS)
143-215.1, which is enforceable under provisions of NCGS 143-
215.61.
It is our understanding that your Animal Waste Management
Plan was recently approved and construction work will soon be
started if it has not already been. While you are under
construction or awaiting construction, please make every effort
to assure that discharge is not allowed to reach surface waters.
As you are aware, your dairy should be certified by December 31,
1997.
P.O. Box 29535, ��FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �C
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

n
U
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
r �
U
A. Received by (Please Print Clearly} B. Date of Delivery
-7-rte
C.Si ture
X ❑ Agent
(7� ❑ Addie
D. Is deny res&fterent hum item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES. enid delivery address below: ❑ No
44-11
H. DEAN ROSS
H. DEAN Ross FARM
220 BUNNY RUN LANE
3. ce Type
WAYNESVILLE NC 28786
i
j
Certified Mail
❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail
0 C.Q.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2, Article Number ropy from Service labeQ
PS Form 3811, July 1999
Domestic Return Receipt
rpzs9&94M-1789

S •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 11, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville NC 28786
Farm Number: 44 - 11
Dear H. Dean Ross:
IX V
/ • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that H_ Dean Ross Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-2I5.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and a[] supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or
Wanda Frazier with the Asheville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Asheville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

09/12/2000 15:57 FAX [phone]
September 12. 2000
LiRDA NAT RESOURES
•
Haywood Soil and Water Conservation Distract
S89 Rauumn Road Suite 203 Waynesville, NC 28785
(828) 4!t2-2741 (829) 4565,5132 6d- 3
MM 452-7031 FAX
Sue Homewood
I- C Division of Water Quality
?tion -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Sen-1ce Center
Raleigh, North. Carolina 2 7699- 1617
Dear Ms. Homewood -
I zm working on the permitting packet of information for the foliowing farmers:
44-11 — Dean Ross
44-15 , Ralph Ross
44-58 `Frank Medford
44-14 — Johnny Ferguson
1 did not get the requests until last Thursday and Friday and the information packet` are
due back in your office today. The farmers kept this request until the last minute, s, even
though it is their responsibility. I AU get the information in as soon as T possibly ca -
I left the request for a sinal] extension of time on your voice mail but wanted to foil w up
ix'th this written request.
.-L nk ,iou for your consideration and if you need more information please do not h aitate
:o ask.
ai;icer
V
Les a Smathers
Haywood'SWCD
CONSERVATION • DEVELOPMENT + SELF-GOVERNMENT
fa 001

0
FacHity Number. 4i—iledion I 12299
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes 0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during lend application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, [] Yes C4 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. 1s the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le, broken fart belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shuacrs, etc.) ❑ Yes 0 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Yes CK No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthernporary cover? ❑ Yes 0 No
.�; �--t,: >.;��� �•.. -:��. ; � �: �:�.. - -tom :�; ::;�<> a=,n.4:..,,�._,h,�.� �-n<:�-:-.�:;.>. {w:
c � -c.a�i>r,;:'wa- :2.`?. , t %�R 'Lsk _�>' , r - 6. � yC.a ;a�c:`::;a«:. ?v w`t:• ,S;z,..�r.��>@; cu •W4� .>. - rf=:....� �: to-' -;R-�c.^.
Printed on 1217193
r'
Printed on 1217193
r'

Facility Number. 44-11 4*f Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions " was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8_ Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancehmprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
1212199
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes H No
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
v'(ofatioai4* r, ,CxCieReie9-pvir-e; -o' W, duHiug Mis-vitit,"X�u r�cejv a �p �r�e;� :
16iriSil) �idettce 2600' i *his. visit,' :.:.:.. ' . :::.:.:::::..:..:...:...: :
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes C9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ($ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
dairy is not yet certified, but no longer has a discharge of any type of waste. The special agreement under which the dairy is
rating expires 12131/99.
A liquid level marker indicating maximum storage capacity must be installed before certification can be complete_ Haywood Soil &
iter should be able to provide assistance in the installation of the marker.
dairy is extremely well maintained and is a pleasure to inspect.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: / - f -
on 12117199

Facility Number 44 i l Date of Inspection128199
Time of Inspection 1 ilHl 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[j Permitted Q Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Noter nal Date Last Operated: T�
Farm Name: H, flan Rnee Farm .. _. County: Ha�WQRd _._.__�____�-•--. 9BII _
Owner Name: H. Dean ... —.... _._._._..ti. _ Raxa_---•-W-- ..._ .._ _.... Phone No:
Facility Contact: D=MHNI .. . _ _ _-Tide: Phone No:
Mailing Address: 220 Bunny Run Zane _ _ _.._ _.. Wa3mcuAc.KC...... _ 28126-- _
Onsite Representative: a?ean.Rz%%8QXRoss integrator.
Certified Operator: Elahimt B. Russ „- . w. - .. --- Operator Certification Number: 212M_
Location of Farm:
Latitude 3S • L...' �I Longitude ®• Ol I8 cc
Discharges & Stream facts
I - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were theme any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure. 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Freeboard (inches):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the strnchires observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepa.gr, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
H No
❑ Yes
W No
❑ Yes
®No
Structure 6
❑ Yes 0 No
Con inued on hark
Printed on 12117!99

NOR'C�ROLINA DEPARTMEN OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AsHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 7, 2000
Mr. Dean Ross
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
Subject: Animal Operation Inspection
Dean Ross Farm 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the routine on-
site inspection of the animal waste handling system for your
dairy farm. The inspection was conducted on December 2,
1999.
Thank you for your cooperation in the installation and
implementation of your animal waste management system.
Please remember that part of the requirement of the AWMP is
record keeping of waste applications and to get manure and
soil analysis performed. If you have any questions, please.
do not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208.
Sin rely
D. Keith Haynes
Environmental Specialist
xc: Haywood Soil & Water Office
44-11. let
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE. ARHIEVILLE, NC 261301-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACT10N EMPLOYER - SO% RRCYCLED/IO% PORT -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolin •
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr I Stevens, Director
July H. 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
H. Dean Ross
H_ Dean Ross Farm
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville NC 28786
Farm Number: 44 - II
Dear H. Dean Ross:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANP NATURAL RE50URCE5
JUL
You are hereby notified that H. Dean Ross Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.100, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty 60 days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation_ In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. if any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or
Wanda Frazier with the Asheville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Asheville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
4
ot

vrstoa of Water Quality x _ ,
Ng_
€ Sail_and�Vater Conservah.
cer. ea -_ -
w O �r r = ,
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 44 11 Date of Visit: 10/11/2000 Time: 1330
Q Not O rational O Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified D Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- .........................
Farm Name: H,.Acaa..ttosafairin .................................................. .................................. County: Hay-wQ9.4 .......................................... ARQ............
Owner=came: JL.X?t;a,11.................................. Rus .............................................................. Phone No: (8281.926-34Ct0.... ...................................................
Facility Contact: V.921&5a..................................................---... Title: Qw.acr ................................................. Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 4..V..HWe.R4ash...............................................................
Onsite Representative: jj)C;to..lvss......
Certified Operator:H0ber-t................................... R0,51 .....................................
Location of Farm:
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road
.... W aYjic"[.e...XC.................................................. 2 -81% ------------
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:2,ij95-4 .............................
[I Swine [I Poultry ® Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 • 35 L OS Longitude 83 ' O1 18
Design Current
awiur
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acity Population Cattle C2p2City CapacityPopulation
❑ Layer FE]
Dairy 200 180
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I f
Total Design Capacity 200
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 0 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
L Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at- ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -trade? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systertV (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ....... waste.pond....... __ ............................... ................................... ............. _..................... .............................
Freeboard (inches): 120
5100
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 4L—tt Date of Inspection 10/11/2000
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the ity of any of the structures observed? {ie/ treoevere erosion ❑ Yes ® No
J
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9_ Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
I5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
I6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, reaps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22_ Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No viotations:or deflcieneies-were noted'djuTiiag-this visit. You will receive po.fyrther-
corres ondence. abonf this .visit. _
Com>aents (refer to, gnestzon#>7 Eapiatn any -YES answers ated/or any recouattendations or any other comments: r'
Use drawutgs 9-t facility to tietter eaplain;situatious. (use!additional:pages as; necessary}
The waste holding pond still needs a level marker. The operator is awaiting assistance from the local soil & water tecnicians
+
onceming record keeping. The waste management system is well maintained and operated_ It should be noted that the design
capacity listed on this report is incorrect. The design capacity is 300.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Keitb Haynes'-
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 5100

' Fl_-MTONII�amber. 44-11::] i
Daae of Inspection 1Q/1112Q130 i printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structuress observed? (ie/ trees, severe erasion,
- seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste managmnent or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require mamtcnancelunpr wement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste APPUcation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Cora. Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay)
10/192000
II Yes
No
Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
0 Yes
19 No
19Yes
❑No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 9 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility creed a wettable sere determination? ❑ Yes C1 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage bt: General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(id WUP, checklists, design, mss, ctc•)
19. Does record keeping steed improvcmcnt? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis btu soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the bme_of design?
21- Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/hispector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
CM Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes C$ No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
Q Yes N No
Q• Y>� O:r* t ire cieB-wide. Meetw.dnk ng 019 *bit.. X -61t W0F.rkeW. 3b )"C' .'
• ' �C liidit?.aC1Z BbOtn 'f�1L4- r►�f#.' . . _ . ' . _ . . . ' . ' _ ' . . . . '
ar ra<, :<,� -?;>„, .i, v.�a<fawzM�'�i�i;"`'.;:utiiiEsA;:,.:�.:•�,,' zfkc:«#t- -x<
E - ]i,
_WWWA:
M.
ft
Mia ..wn °".Ya .YX„_.L!nYCrit�'r{:gh{ai^.<w�; ,i,. y�„ri:-`.
-
- ...,, -:!$`d.- .»`',
a'r}[ v.
�`.
n;}`S'�n.T�r
}, ...:.>,...+•».M �.",. ..:ups- ,,.:ia+»..,,rrv...:} i..�,,:: v..,w..±�.>....v.+'.a>: r.. ..wJ.
waste holding pond still needs a level marker. The operator is awaiting assistancc from the local soil btu water tecnicians concerning
w
keeping. The waste management system is well maintained and operated It should be noted that the design capacity listed on this
ort is incarrect. The design capacity is 300.
=Reviewerluspector Name
w
Reviewerflnspecbor Signature: Date: a.;D O 3/00

E
(Type of Irish 0 Compliance inspecton O Operon review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Nish @) Routine .O Complaint O FoQow up O Emergency Notification O lather ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 44 11 Date of VIS& 1U/11fZ00p Tune: 1330 Printed on: 10/192000
O Not OjErational Q Below Threshold
Permitted H Certified L3 Conditionally Cerafled E3 Registered Date Last Operate or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: EL Dcan Rasa Eann..— _ County: HAywmKL___------------ ARO_
Owner Name: ]L-Ucm- , Ran— Phone No: Gil
Facility Contact: Din B*"s Twe: Qzm= _ __ . _ Phone No: _
Mailing Address: 40 Hale.Rgad _ , _ ._. Wwmeavilk. NC
Onsite Representative: Reay Ram__. .__ Integrator:
Certified Operator: Hebert Ross_T . Operator Certification Number: 2145a
Location of Farm:
Joe Carver Rd off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road LW -1
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry H Cattfa []Ha.. Latitude F -3 -5 --le K Longitude • (Fl 18
Discharges & Stream Imp
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes H No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in pl mm?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWt) ❑ Yes Q No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes cc No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other thea from a disehatge? ❑ Yes H No
Waste CoQecdon & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (fxveboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes H No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Strad= 3 SUmcture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):._. _� . l �Q .- - ._......»................».....,».. .

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hint, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Dean Ro s s
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville, North
Dear Mr. Ross:
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 15, 2000
Carolina 28786
• •
81
�f -
NCI)ENRNORTH
opr
ENviRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Animal Operation Inspection
Dean Ross Farm 44-11
Haywood County
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the routine on-site
inspection of the animal waste handling system for your dairy farm.
The inspection was conducted on October 11, 2000.
It should be noted that part of the requirement of the Animal
Waste Management Plan is record keeping of waste applications including
manure and soil analyses. Additionally, a level marker must be
installed in your waste holding pond.
Thank you for your cooperation in the installation and
implementation of your animal waste management system. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208.
Sin erely
D. Keith Hayn
Environmental Specialist
xc: Haywood Soil & Water Office
59 Woodlin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number: 44-11 • Date of Inspection 9/18/2001 Printed on: 9/25/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste ADDliCatiOn
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11- Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records &_Documents
T
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Pian readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24-
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Co a eats (refer to question #} Eaplar y YES answers and/or any r&omrnendat�ons or:any other comments ,
Use drof facility to better explain sitnhons (useddittonal pages as necessary) ❑Field Copy Final Notes -
R
_� _
Ross was extremely busy cutting com on the day of my vist. He requested that I revisit the dairy in a couple of weeks so he would be
ble to spend the necessary time to do a full inspection. A follow-up inspection will be scheduled during the first two weeks of October.
Questions, not anwsered on this form will be addressed at the time of the next inspeciton-
T
Reviewer/inspector Name D- Keith Haynes -
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
05/03/01 Continued

�_ � � vtsio'ni a[ Sotl and Water Conservation
ther Agency
a
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other Cl Denied Access
Date of Visit. 91181200] Time: 1045 Printed on: 9/25/2001
FFacility Number 44 11
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified © Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: --...-.-..•. • -.-
Farm Name: ._�?l:ari. VSS k alCilA.....-•................... County: jjay.VX9Qjd .......................................... ARO?............
OwnerName: 1 J}C;W .................................. Ross .............................................................. Phone No: (.82ft.92fr 46Q............................................................
Mailing Address: 4.0..Hlfr.RQ.as>.......................................................................'ay.Ilesr.I.e..G....•...........-----•....-----................... 28
..7.8.6
Facility Contact: Mm a.Ross ...................... --.............................. Title: Qw.ner......... ........................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: . ................. Integrator:,,-.-- ......................................................
Certified Operator:HnbexlHI).bjer.1 ................................... RQ55i................................................... Operator Certification Number:,ZI95-4 .............................
Location of Farm:
UI oe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road +
© Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S • F-35-1- t)5 Longitude F 18
Design Current`
Swine. :Capacity -Population . _'Poultry
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Non -La
❑ Other
Design... Current
Design -Current
�a aci Po ulationu -.Cattle :
Ca" aci�` Poo elation
® Dairy
200 225
❑ Non -Dairy
Total DesigE Capacity
200
Total SSLW
280,000
Number. of Lagoons 1 -, ❑Subsurface Drains Present 1107 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area '
- -
HoldEng Ponds;? Sa1�d Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharp-es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
[I Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......wastic-.prand...... ..............
Freeboard (inches): 60
05103101 Continued

FacilihWumber: 44- 11 • Date of inspection 10/25/2001 . Printed on: 11/8/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
N No
seepage, etc.)
Required
Records & Documents
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
17.
closure plan?
El Yes
®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Reviewer/Inspector Xame D Kerth"Haynes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, traps, etc.)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8_ Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
N Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Apt3lication
N No
22.
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16.
is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
money from the cost -share program Whenn he receives this payment, he will be able to invest it in the curb work. All other areas of
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Reviewer/Inspector Xame D Kerth"Haynes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, traps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? I
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
tt =E : `di 3n�Y�b: arld10G8t1]� t 8 h£ C
In rilerliS (fes T'to giII E eCOit3ir�1 Elat[On5 cfl
EAtS. "Ns. �-�1i3drawrg dnakpages as=necessary-._t,
` y ❑ Field Co ❑ Final Notes
=_
�� fc`'.x _ s�'�..v__, z��-` ,: �e"��a �,:'_... - nR �-� zU� . : 1 _113- .'%'�;'.- :I "Z Ai 4V—�."�.•r �.a'$
&8) Some additional curbbing still needs to be installed. Mr. Ross is aware of the need for the curb, but is still owed a large amount of
money from the cost -share program Whenn he receives this payment, he will be able to invest it in the curb work. All other areas of
rite management were in very good condition.
19) Mr. Ross is need of some assistance in record keeping.
The design capacity listed in the database is still incorrect. It should indicate 300.
Reviewer/Inspector Xame D Kerth"Haynes
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y Date:
05/03/01 Continued

r
of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
eason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other F-1Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 1 ORSRQQI Time: 1045 Printed on: 111$!2001
44 11
=Not rational O Below Threshold
© Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold . .............. --- -----
Farm
.Farm Name: 1L.I van-RoAs.1arms......-------------- ----....................... ..... Count3': U43QQ.d.._....... ............ ............ ... ARO ............
OwnerName: ajft,"................................. Rou............................ ......... .................... Phone No: {#2819_ 34!SQ............................. _........... ........
Mailing Address: 41O.AW:AQ.4d..... ....... ..... _. Wayativitk..;NK ........................... .............. Z07.8f............ ..
FacilitN- Contact:
Onsite Representative: t?.ca Rg.s.s­---------------­-
Title:
-­­ Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Hpht t.i? .................. .......... Rqsti...................... -......................... .. Operator Certification Number: Z19 ..........................
Location of Farm:
oe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek- SR 1323 Owen Road +
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 35 05 - Longitude 83 • 5 T -T
18 "
Design Current
awfuc capacity Yo
❑ Wean to Feeder
j] Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feed6
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity PoiDulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver I I ® Dairy 200 275
❑ Non -Layer I I JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 200
Total SSLW 280,000
Number of Lagoons: 0 Subsurface Drains Present I ❑ Lagoon area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps 1 No Liquid Waste llianagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, -what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ----yrAste..pnnd..-------------------------------------- ............. ............. ........ ....---------•------------------- ............................----------- ................... --
Free-board (inches): 72
05/03/01 Condnmed

J
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
A10.r*W'A
.��
NCDENVI
NORTH CAROLINA DFPARTMEKr OF
ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 9, 2001
Mr. Dean Ross
40 Hale Road Lane
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
subject: Animal Operation .Inspection
Dean Ross Farm 44-11
Haywood county
Dear Mr. Ross:
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the routine on-site
inspection of the animal waste handling system for your dairy farm.
The inspection was,conducted for the 2001 inspection year.
In order to assist you and other Haywood County dairymen in record
keeping, I am doping to schedule a training session somewhere in the
county in early December. I will advise you of the time and location
once they are confirmed.
Thank you for your cooperation in the installation and
implementation of your animal waste management system. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 251.-6208.
Sincerely
D. Keith Hay es
Environmental Specialist
XC: Haywood Soil & water Office
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville ,North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Oonortunity Affirmative Action Emolover 50% recvcled/10% Hast -consumer naner

Facility Number: 44-11 • Date of Inspection 91I0/2Q02
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
b. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do arty of the structures need maintenancorimproveAncnt?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation marlangs?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenaneeliimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay)
❑ Yes ® No
[] Yes No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes S No
[j Yes [] No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility Iack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
15. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19_ Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, fiwboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/mspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes H No
[] Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes Q No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
[I Yes No
[] Yes No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. i
-::.-'--vw:isi.S::....::vi{.:{w.:.:L::r:.:i.:":.�,:.:}::i::vi:::{.>:.:.�:f::': i.:.{.1?{{.+::..:u.4: is _ __ _:{{..::.:i{♦1'i:' iYii.r...i::v:{C.:'_ -.2<9f{iii- .t ::.+.xtii':i{�-:{':{<tii::: ".�3ac.:.
z��.-J��elaitl rRLlY4hN0 $ - 5 rV1 Y
.....::......�- .....:: z•:--:..:. 3 ,♦''f ,.t.:;S::.::n.}.r:.; r:r...tSY: +++,.rs.z.\.:.... ...:.. i:...:......v�'
r#wati [j
Field Copy ❑Final Notes
1 curbtag has been install, though one small section is temporary. Records were not reviewed as Mr. Ross did not have time during this
visit A follow-up visit will be performed bi-the years end. The design capacity listed in the database is still incorrect It should be 300 head
LM
Reviewer/inspector NameAN
Reviewer/lnspector Signature:ZWDate: I • % Q�
05103101
Confinued

at Veit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Vis€t O Routine O Complaint •O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Fasdity Number i tl 11 Date of visit: 9/10/2002 Time: 1030
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted 13 Certified M Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Tltreshold-
Farm Name: ...»._...._........ .. ... .....»...._ County: ,ABU _
Owner Name: 1. Dema _ _.... _... _.._ Rosh.._. _ __ . » »_. _».».._ - --- Phone No: (�34br4._---•-----__ . _ _ ,
MaOing Address: 72Q 13nnu3 Run I -ane_ . _. _ _ .__ __. » ». . T �.11� C » _ »». ._— -- Z8736 ---_ -
FaeOity Contact:
Title: ........... .................. _...»..».»»._.... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Iksn Rar9a ..... »._----. .. ». _._. Integrator.
Certified Operator. ��, ...»_ .. __»..... _._... ».» ..._.... .._.. _ Operator Certification Number. 212M_
Location of Farm:
foe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, SR 1323 Owen Road 4
❑ Swine El Poultry M Cattile ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 35 ®" Longitude 83 • 01 18
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
Discharge originated at: © Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes []No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galfmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [j Yes M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. 1s storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Strucd,ure 5 Strucbare b
Identifier: --- WW*d-. pnnd...._
Freeboard (inches):
05103 01

�J
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 4, 2002
NCDENR.
NCM" CAIZOI-l— D: rE r OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAWLIRAL RESOURCES
Mr. Dean Ross
40 Hale Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
subject: Animal operation Inspection
Dean Ross f=arm 44-11
Haywood county
Dear Mr. Ross:
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the routine on-site
inspection of the animal waste handling system for your dairy farm.
The inspection was conducted for the 2002 inspection year.
A follow-up inspection wi 1 l be performed before the end of the
year to check your records so, please make sure to have them in god
order.
Thank you for your ,cooperation in the installation and
implementation of your animal waste management system. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208.
Z
igg
Envi ronmental 5peci al i st
xc: Haywood soil & water office
59 Woodlin Place, Ashevil3e North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
A.. 17.—.1 r1­F..n:l.. A{ir. ....1;. A.-+;-- ih....1....dr Silo%..s. A..All no/ .vrt...nn�.enar na..wr

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
it rf Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Pour name and address on the reverse
so t' t we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
�. E�a n RO 5' S
0-0-0 8u,,.,Y /-.*Ie
Warnos,.,'Ile, �G x$7$6
2. Article
�q
F,,,,/,16 —
_
(Copy from service faW
PS f=orm 3811, Juiy 1599
i
A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) I B. Date of Delivery
C. Signaturd
X Agent
_ ❑ Addressee
D. Is def different from item 1? yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
�(( 06--� 4&'-6 �U
3. Service Type
XCertified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered © Retum Roceipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail O C.O_D_
4. Restricted Delivery? (Fxtra Feel © Yes
V/q qqd 7
Domestic Rethm Receipt
� 102545-00-M0952

0
March 17, 2003
H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville, NC 28786
RE: Permit application for H. Dean Ross Farm
Facility# 44-11
Dear Mr. Ross:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
You are hereby notified that H. Dean Ross Farm, in accordance with G -S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must he returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Sue Homewood
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension
502 or the Asheville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
cc: Permit File (w/o encl,)
Asheville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
>r1 CDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% past -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enr.state.nc. us

Facility Number: 44_11 D:►tc of Inspection ® .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (Ir any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 I . is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
E3 Yes ® No
E] Yes ®No
E3 Yes ® No
E3 Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
E3 Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? p Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have a!1 components of the Certified Anima! Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ® No
J3 Yes p No
E] Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
E3 Yes p No
E3 Yes ® No
E3 Yes N No
N Yes p No
p Yes ® No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
_C entsf `efr tiquestioitj:Eicplain�y YDS"gnswers=an'dlor�any re�oritmenda#ions oaQy ot�ter�romments.
T]sefdrawrngs 4i a'ctI w. to;better.-explain-situations.E@ additional pages es necessary : � Field CaFY p Final Notes
The dairy waste managment system appeared to be well operated and maintained. Questions not answered will be addressed at a later
te. As is the case with most family owned dairies, everyone was very busy during my visit, so the proper amount of time for a record
review was not available.
Reviewer/inspector Name �K�Hayn$
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number "lite of Visii: (19/24/2003 'lime: 1:30
p Not Operationalp Below Fhreshold
p Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above "Threshold:......••••••.•...........
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm County: Haywolad ........................................... ARO............
Owner Name: H. Dean
Ross
Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2211.$Auutx.Burn.Lan........................................................................ r.Wayluesvi>Ie..NiC............_............
Facility Contact: Hearn.RD s ........................................................Title: O.tetter.............................. I ......... ......... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Andy..Etars.........................
Certified Operator: RofGert..11 .............................. Ross ..............................
Location of Farm:
................... Z8786 ..............
Integrator: ........................ ......................... I ..
........... Operator Certification Number -21-954 .............................
p Swine p Poultry ® Cattle C1 Horse Latitude ©•©° ®° Longitude ®• ®r ®L
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: [3 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ) Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? la Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 13 Spillway p Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 6 Structure 6
Identifier ......wasttr..ptzttrl......
Freeboard(inches): ................ 50. ............... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................

'Stat#1of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
•
1 • •
�f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50VACES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Mr. Dean Ross
40 Hale Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
Dear Mr. Ross:
December 11, 2003
Subject: Animal Operation Inspection
Dean Ross Farm 44-11
Haywood County
Please find enclosed a printed copy of the routine on-site inspection of the animal waste
handling system for your dairy farm. The inspection was conducted for the 2003 inspection
year. If you already have a copy of the Report, just disregard this one.
If you have not already done so, please make sure that your recording keeping is up-to-
date.
Thank you for your cooperation in the installation and implementation of your animal
waste management system. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at
25'1-6208.
Sincrely,
D. Keith Haynes
Environmental Specialist
xc: Haywood Soil & Water Office
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number 44 - Date: 1 6122104
0
COMMENTS:
# 18. Mr. Ross was missing a waste analysis for the Fall 2003 waste applications (Sample needs to be
within 60 days of the application date). Need to send in a waste sample to cover the May 2004
applications.
Mr. Ross would like to get certified for 300 head of cattle. This was mentioned on last years review as
well. The waste plan will also need to be revised and available for review.
# 57. 1 went over the slung li form briefly with Mr. Ross. Mr. Ross had a record of the number of loads,
he dates applied, and fields that waste was applied to.
# 28. 1 provided Mr. Ross with some slung I and 11 forms.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST lRocky Durham
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 6123104 Entered By: lRocky Durham
3 03/10/03

0 •
Facility Number 44 - i 1 Date:
6127104
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Pian Revision or Amendment
®
EJ
10. Level in structural freeboard
Waste Pian Conditional
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Amendment
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
El
El 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
El
E]❑
15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30.2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
[117. Deficient irrigation records
® 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33.Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
[121. Crop needs improvement
35. sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removaliclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation
1:1
El
El Other...
system designfrnstallation
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements (G PS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
El
1:15'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
$7. Record keeping education
❑
6
58. Cropiforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

chnical Assistance Site Visit Report
r F
Di n of Soil and Water Conservation
p Natural Resources Conservation Service
Q Soil and Water Conservation District
p Other...
Facility Number 44 - 11 Date: 6122104 Time: 1 10:15 1 Time On Farm: 65 ARO
Farm Name H. Dean Ross Farm County Haywood Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 220 Bunny Run Lane Waynesville NC 28786
Onsite
Representative Dean and Ronnie Ross Integrator
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse
O Routine
O Response to DWQIDENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerlintegrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Ca acl Population Capacity Population
❑ Layer
[I Non -Layer
Wean to Feeder
El
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
® DairyZoo
❑ Non -Dairy
250
® DairyZoo
❑ Non -Dairy
250
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? [:]yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP
Level (Inches) 40
CROP TYPES lCom, Silage heat Fescue -graze
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03110103

Facil�y.Num?her: — I DaOf Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ®mss ❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 9Kes ❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Lames ❑ No
U-<Vaste Application Rlrreeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 91 -Ko
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes M.Nb
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes g] Ko
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q -No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
UI o
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
94-<o
NPDES Permitted Facilities
1! A--(- �j
fj.Q 2� r e C Q
�,Ja Q nA��SiS' r -e Silk k A4 2 /10' `l
30. is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Addition it Comments and/or Drawings
AL
Woad O -A "o s r...- ` r_.,, VS , W Lk' P.
0,63 S o I L -C, 2 0 0 ItiJa +� � o rrfy
1! A--(- �j
fj.Q 2� r e C Q
�,Ja Q nA��SiS' r -e Silk k A4 2 /10' `l
i ��� � ,.�--PP
atoms �- S1 u�- r; ..
an elca o.WdAln
ou �A
Q
12/12/03

I 4,
Facility Number: - 40 Date of Inspection 0 ��� r44,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑xo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2<o
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes I<o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes DK
elevation markings?
Waste Aonlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [?�No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [3 Frozen Ground [:ICopper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type e, oft- r\ <, i LV'i .14. ki"-eii1- .- C a V�&-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes P -N6
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? f.
16. Is there a lack of adequate w=aste application equipment? a{ � `� 6"AL SP, -,e
Odor Issues
IT Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes D -No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes j9-6
❑ Yes M-440
B"T'& ❑ No
❑ Yes �
❑ Yes L7 No
❑ Yes [moo
Comments (refer to quesizan #) Esplsin-any YES answeis.andlbr any: recom endations or,a'n other comments
_y. _. ,..._�...
Useeft drawings 'of facility to better -explain situations (useyadditional pages as necessary, : - � ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
s , y S
P'td i�L1 �.dS ab©'-; WAll �-t �r-�-�) n o cy-4or
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/12103 Continued

L
Type of Visit 40 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4PRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time:
Facility Number �/ /�
=Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted [3f Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ..l•'..i.....,Dea,n....... &*s. County: .............
................................................................. .........................................................................
Owner Name: 0.1fAn....... �................................................................... ... . Phone No: , ®' .1 k2..�`'f..�©
DD..................................
Mai ling-Ad dress: .2 0 tnn , U17 LQ e .................... ....... ....................... —
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:
Onsite Representative: ... . ...........................................................................
CertifiedOperator:.....................................................................................
Location of Farm:
off NCC 976 Ja,1afh&-1 . 5
Phone No:
Integrator:......... ............... ......
Operator Certification Number:
13-23 OGS
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • �64 Longitude 0• 6 Du
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Hnldina Pandc / Snlid Trans
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
iCanaci Ponulation
��a•
Mai
.�_
Total Design Capi
Total
/ / C�rfrlyc��l }ur
300
ity
W
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Dr^
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other i
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
�d
❑ Yes C4 -No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EI.No
❑ Yes QNs
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Imo. Af-..Pa.......................................................................................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches):
12/12/03 Continued

Fac ility Number: 44-11 Da Inspection 11/22/2004 •
T
Required Records & Documents
1. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
N Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
N Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
® Yes
❑ No
N Waste Application N Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWW?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDFS Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Forms ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
dditionaliComtitents`a id/or D-' s �;-40' '° ti '" ' .. �� •._ . 'r
. {c.w.-o9 :i.PK �:.:. -M•, :ia.�}uw?^� -j}x,• �:r �a=3�. 7��1s {_;A�'''i'':[r '4:.`*rY'�1=i.::aTL.i
T
12112/03

Facility Number: -11 Date of Inspection 11122/2004 1• '
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
E] Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
C1osUTe plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancehn1provement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes N No
elevation markings?
Ni'aste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type corn silage winter wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below N Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of mind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately_
Co�rlUttentS (refer t0 question#) Explaln,flAy YES.ans�wer5 m
and/or anywreCOmendations or any Other comments.— a Tir ,a,4 �
Use drawrngs;of facility to better eiplatnstuattons. (nse adiittional gages as necessary) ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
• S'� 5r:_ ?._ELI. +I _,AC ` r 4... jF _ ,:='?e - nl. '�''r ':.ti ,�. �� =-wr - - a l • d
AM -
17. Discharge is above mater level. No odor was noticed.
•
1. This facility is certified but not permitted. A permit application mill be sent Mr. Ross,
2. The m-aste plan was not available. The Haywood SWCD is in the process of revising the waste plan. the plan should be complete by
e first quarter of 2005.
3. Soil and waste analyses have been submitted to the lab: awaiting results.
SLUR -1 Form has been filled out, need to complete SLUR -2 Forms. It is recommended that you contact the Haywood SVvCD for
assistance with record keeping.
Freeboard levels are not being recorded but will not be cited at this time as this is a condition of the General Permit and the facility
is not yet permitted. It is strongly recommended however that you begin recording these levels as it will be a requirement when
you are permitted.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Bev Price
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _/ ,i ,.� Date:
12/121n,? Conrinued
A

#-M, ''" :3wce ..Or,, ,.:ly"'3.-. `„y 7..., -g,
4` `s
Ir. vision of Water{Qltallty
,; ,. ` O Division of Soil.and Water Conservation
d-� a'i - I - (t^-'� rv.: .F n_ �` = Sr L ti k iCr.•
t 5.. r 3� O.Other Agencyw� �.�t�^+ , �t'; �u rfk.
r
jx
TV
F
Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 44 11 Date of Visit: 11/22/2004 Time: 1:OOprn
.. O Not Operational O Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ........................ County: .......................................... 4ji,,HQ ............
OwnerName: 1j.Q0;;A.................................. Rom .............................................................. Phone No: (AZU926:-.3.4.6.0 ........................................................
Mailing Address: Z2Q...>Aflnx.Ruja.L;4ju....................................................................... YYRy.aV.* jle..NK................................................._ Z8.7.8.6 .............
FacilityContact: ....Title : ....... ......................................................... Phone No: ......... -........................................
OnsiteRepresentative:...................................................... Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Robina.JJ........................ RQFs................................................... Operator Certification Number:2.19.54,......................
Location of Farm:
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road +
ri
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 'F-35-E-657�° Longitude 83 • O1 18
Design
Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Ca aci",
Population Poultry
Capacity Po ulation Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑Dairy
200 1230
❑ Feeder to Finish
JEINon-Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
200
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
280,000
Number of Lagoons,
Discharges R Stream lmnaets
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. notify DWQ) [] yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system! (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
«'aste Collection .0 Treatntent
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Stl-UCture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Sinucture 6
Identifier: ......m:aste..pond......... ................................ ............... -................... ....... .......................... .. .
Freeboard (inches): 60
12/12/03

O�pF W a7-,q pMichael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
as I&r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
pY Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 2, 2004
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm f-+,
220 Bunny Run Lane `
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On November 22, 2004, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for the H. Dean Ross Farm. The maintenance and operation of the dairy appeared to
be very good.
Upon further review of your permitted status I've discovered that you are certified but not
permitted. I have requested that an application be sent to you. Should you need assistance with the
application, please feel free to contact me.
One area of concern noted during the inspection was with regard to record keeping. The SLUR -2
Forms need to be completed. It is recommended that you contact the Haywood County Soil and Water
Conservation District for assistance with record keeping. Additionally, liquid levels in the holding pond are
not being recorded but will not be cited at this time as this is a requirement of the General Permit, and the
facility is not yet permitted. It is strongly recommended however that you begin recording these levels, as
it will be a requirement when you are permitted. Freeboard levels should be recorded on a weekly basis.
You indicated that you would like to get certified for 300 head of cattle. Your current certification is for
200. You must get the waste plan revised and re -certified if you wish to expand above the current
number. Please see the attached inspection report for additional comments.
It was a pleasure meeting you and I appreciate your assistance during the inspection. If you have
any questions regarding this inspection or need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely
-.I✓ A�C�P
Bev Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
No�rthttCarolina
,XWuna!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
lntemet h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Regcled110% Post Consumer Paper

•
Permit AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 1211312D05 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Rouline
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 11000
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlnspection with on-site representative? ❑ 9 1311
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Page: 6

i
i
Permit: A=440011 owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12!1312005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit- Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? N!
Design? 40
Maps? IN
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below. yy
Waste Application? SLUPD-1 SLuQ-2 �i
❑
UO Minute inspections? NrT
❑
1'
Weather code? Ju., z� - �JG<< G4,Y1 r • �.� V r t s
❑
Weekly Freeboard? '
❑
Transfers? < `
rl
❑
,?
Rainfall? `i
❑
J
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthEy?1d&J ry+Wt �� /
+L1
❑
Waste Analysis? Vf7I°5 L:S_b p1= -z 16�loc�o�,a[. 8
❑
Annual soil analysis? U/:2:2/0 ��� SO`` a"�%SSS ���
❑
Crop yields? W �Q 4°J�r�-.S' a.�X' ��`� f ���
❑
Stocking? j�1a-�6Gg'�+g, b�� r-, ���� 1 �`,
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDFS only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDFS only)?
❑
❑ N ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
jo
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ R9 ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? a )q 5j b, AuST
❑
10 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
IR ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
11 ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates? i1
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
S ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

•
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number. 440011
Inspection Date: 12113x2005 Inspection Type: Cornplianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No INA NE
PAN? Dy ❑
Is PAN > 1OW10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 L'e n -SI 4-5-.
CropType2 Lv,- ' 'A'e' ( r �4
Crop Type 3 F e.5CIL c � `? '--e—r-4 [L�
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
0
Q
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
99
❑
Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
It
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
Q
D
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
00
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? Po �snr• i L ��`
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? I� 4 dot .
❑
0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below. P
(Y•f�S'j1G1
l_
WtJP?
Page: 4

• •
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12/13/2005 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ 19 ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 1111610
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
❑
Hydraulic Overload? 1 U'
❑
Frozen Ground? N
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
LM
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
93
❑ U
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Cl
10
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
B
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
M
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
R
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
a
Cl
Cl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
M
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
moo
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload? 1 U'
❑
Frozen Ground? N
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? G
❑
Page: 3

•
Permit AWC440011 Owner- Facility: H Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12113/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
P �
Ca��Q ��rr►-1
Facility Number: 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Active Permit AWC44011 Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComolianM Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region: Asheville
jn:15
Date of Visit: 12/13/2005 Entry Time: 19-'99 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Form Owner Email:
Owner: H Dean Ross Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 220 gunny Ln Waynesville NC 28786
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35035'05" Longitude: 83°01'18"
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross Operator Certification Number: 21954
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
3 oO ,
Page: 1

Permit- AVVC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12113!2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? D m D
32. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 C1 ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Q ■ Q Q
Page: 6

0
Permit: AWC440011 Owner: Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Data: 1211312005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ■
Design? ■
Maps? ■
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
■
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
■
Stacking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑
❑
■
23. If selected, did the,facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ Q
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■ ❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
Cl
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
Q
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Q ■ ❑ Q
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC440011 owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12113/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 100/6/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cam (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat.
Barley. Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0 ❑ Cl ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ 0
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl ■ 0 ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
■
Page: 4

If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Q
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Permit: AWC440011 owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility
Number:
440411
Inspection Date: 12/13/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Q
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
■
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
I]
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? • -
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
000
or closure pian?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any pari of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
Q
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Q
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

• •
PermlL- AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12/1312005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cable --Milk Cow 200 250
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Page: 2
f

•
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency nn
Facility Number: 440011_ Facility Status: active Permit: AWC440011 Ll Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rine _ _ County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/13t2005 2005 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:45 AM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross arm _ Owner Email:
Owner: tj Dean R
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 220 Bung Run Ln _ _ Wawnesville-NC 28786
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude:35�35'05" Longitude: 8 '18"
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross Operator Certification Number: 21954
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Be erly Price n Phone:
Inspector Signature: - ' {[�� Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:417105 LSD N=7.2 Ibl1000 gal B
Soil analysis: 12122104, 2005 soil analysis has yet to be collected.
/j -o2 _-D-0 rJ
194 20. This facility is not yet permitted. Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District is revising the waste plan. As soon as
the waste plan is revised a permit application should be submitted. Mr. Ross has indicated that the farm should be certified for 300
head but the current certification shows 200 head. The waste plan must be revised before exceeding 200 head.
21. When permitted the following items will require documentation: 1) weather conditions at time of application, 2) weekly waste pond
freeboard levels, 3) waste transfers, 4) rainfall events -rain gauge must be installed, 5) waste pond inspections after a greater than one
inch rainfall & monthly, 6) crop yields, 7) stocking- monthly.
24. Waste application equipment must be calibrated
Record keeping is much improved since 2004.
Page: 1

At OF W a rFq Lc e! F. Easley, Governor
Q • 57
0 �� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 29, 2005
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 13, 2005, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the H. Dean Ross Farm. The maintenance and operation of the dairy appeared to be very
good
I understand that Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation is revising your waste plan. When you
receive the new waste plan you should submit a permit application as.soon as possible as you are
currently operating without a permit. You indicated that you would like to get certified for 300 head of
cattle. Your current certification is for 200. You must get the waste plan revised and re -certified if you
wish to expand above the current number. You should contact the technical specialist to ensure the
waste plan revision includes the increased capacity.
Your record keeping has improved greatly since your last inspection. There will be additional record
keeping requirements when your permit is issued. Please refer to the inspection report for a list of items
that will require documentation. As we discussed during the inspection, the approved reporting forms can
be found at the following address http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndceu/AnimaUStateGenera[PermitForms.xis
Lastly, your waste application equipment will require calibration. It is recommended that you contact the
Haywood County Soil and Water Conservation District for assistance with calibration.
Please see the attached inspection report for additional comments. Thank you for taking the time to meet
with me; your assistance was greatly appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this report or
need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO f�°0 Carolina
Aturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-523-6748
Internet hkenr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAtfirmaWe Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

O�OF W A Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 29, 2005
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
220 Bunny Run Lane
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 13, 2005, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the H. Dean Ross Farm. The maintenance and operation of the dairy appeared to be very
good.
I understand that Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation is revising your waste plan. When you
receive the new waste plan you.should submit a permit,application as soon as possible as you are
currently operating without a permit. You indicated that you would'like to get certified for300 head of
cattle. Your current certification is for 200. You must get the waste plan revised and re -certified if you
wish to expand above the current number. You should contact the technical specialist to ensure the
waste plan revision includes the increased capacity.
Your record keeping has improved greatly since your last inspection. There will be additional record
keeping requirements when your permit is issued. Please refer to the inspection report for a list of items
that will require documentation. As we discussed during the inspection, the approved reporting forms can
be found at the following address http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndceu/Animal/StateGeneralPermitForms.xis
Lastly, your waste application equipment will require calibration. It is recommended that you contact the
Haywood County Soil and Water Conservation District for assistance with calibration.
Please see the attached inspection report for additional comments. Thank you for taking the time to meet
with me; your assistance was greatly appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this report or
need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc:_ Leslie Smathers, Haywood County_, Soil-& Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203.Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmaWe Action Employer - 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper
N�om�
`n Caro a
,71
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]

fi C' t f , ii h y w • a r 1 I a F i h r r~ r P ,!- L p r ; r, �tNe4
MEN
� �� ''•Jst"•'������ A - =' ^ r - �' .":� a� .fit }�;
�' hi fir' i Ar h �y /�• r _ I' } }�
{' ZuAIX�-
W knit
`�fi
y �,� ��`;I�,.��,'�:�ti^ � � �..,, i �' Seo •, �
:� �
OWN tTK;�
err"'ka,r,
le
or 1
elf
LU
}�s,'-ck ,fir �• J �
- - - - -
��
I -
a .r ... `
i:f,�,ttc„. 1 ,� t`1 kr:-'' amTe,lv;MNr, �^ '¢ [. Ser r�>t, v Ef f*ffr`�tS'F, rd'rk: �i 31 r:.,.�
,"r . . f '• ,,. r,{ , F.. ,d, .,q MC., -i'i' 3'ry,y; +r, S }s".. :ia :. 'y. r..'. .,y _ }.,, -. ,"•,.
r a1 -t c';zhy [• W 't r '4r „ . w 'S 7M' ,' -: J -,, ,� �,.:. - f .i M '� 1 i... r, t• 'wr �•- _
�,. ,%','- t - i � v
ral k:,J.'7rr�` -� ' '-•�'�, P 1rh, �'��a
„i5..
'i "`'i'-.'�"a��'-�'?3;:.as;L�:"�"{•<it:u - t. c,'r`r. ,f:•<j,-
w i:` a,•� vfYJ niw dyh, .ak YFy�, �d ytw.SXr° LJ:ra%t"fix u'drt4�::f1 , �{?
1� 4� F a' .:e,r ',rl!7Y`rti•' y?. "1Fl�tti'-' ,'n : i�."�. r a... �.#•' tiCA _R I .'.i
'aI' rl' t �i' -, :rf.;'y'r �. r�rr-a�,!G:,„,.,a+Tr. .3:. rt.f'; "[xy ,. .� �J h 5�7 Fi !?�.� �s P 'fr'- ,'i.' 'J':rt.f,r >� , ay:,3vr�ut. i.dy.i,ii, F"t ' _�S) 43 rs . �, i :4k' , a h`7 '•ri •�,.F: Spaa .z'�f',!`„ '.` r.. � 'Y^'.aJr`u.�` + '`i-k't k4, .lY ,.P�,+k�._✓n_?t-.".1'Q4 I It3e rJ..'..;.y.�:;j1 ri,.';-.!_•,.'_+�. :`t'�' r,Ir' .p}?e
'krr7<
X
k,,jj,, ,)x. Jvd- _ ,yh -t tr •�`i' w_ai E.: „! i r.�,, 'i ,�,.1i a J;,'I` r' IP #i'k�r.,'�i J ifs' y �i'�" - r ,jP", I:.. ^�' L'
.,•e w" 51 •"`•,.r£.,; '.,r'• `�. ,.;ii3t I'd ,1 t N .t• � � i a �- �:�. 'Y : �.'tU IR J i�; r tir' i�, p'. {',* �Sr r'W, ,i i " � b r ,r.� ' C ,�- .r, t ,:F�r 5'.r kp,
�,. �, �r..�; fr, ti�"'�:��,k,ti . � ;�.�, •�„'- +� .•F� fi�1��.,, ;. �,''.ar�:•;r, J ..pry .;�. i ,, f ,�,:. �:1,. Q,� +� xJ >�k` � . r s r. .�
t•'tv z 'rr rd' :h kI _ "Swf 'r�"+, a !,'1?1, k.}r, (+; r,✓r . E: 22 .. w:c •ly- d ,.�1.s, it^t' L �.. S .�.'i'`i.`ly!4�� p ht:ifS�yI Y'~ a°Y�.:, Iu,LI.A"4::' �. :
,E3 J �.3 re, � v7”+. f' ,�"" '�vki a �r.�'a x✓'d ,�+;�YF[t 1.}n ,-' t- j�1.. "t�i1 �,� .I�-t'.^'� ., t`�irPx '£a 1,"i: ,� 'Sry .d:, E3". •,I'.7 •�i Cr1.:fNa �^: r �1 y.-. k� . *:.. { 4:`
`�:, . _,�ii,ee•& ;.s`s4 'J .;f tid, e�:r..:', .w' ;.ri�'�,....r x:5,t, •;%sf s'.,:. �...a:,grl :•t, .;Y+.'iA,a'?r, ,.i ,3,y re-.',q`w�er, k.
f'tA„r. •9 r 5. ,Ftl �F hr.• ;;.i '.,'� = i � r;+�� � nn`�r,1 ] n a� .Y.r .,y 3 r w': r q,�' �c ly' r 1. :k�a 11 :Mr, v�, r:. ��tt.r . ,�j5 *_ ,y�y, 1
7a t
r�4 �. I Y.! 1 r✓
y:� 'i "I
it !C`r, p, ]'} � ' �r37-., �z F, f + Y fl �.�,. y� : } t:: s rr +. •S
:� a i ! I. 4. > 3' `t , � '• ,.. y �. t k' '`�. � � h
h•... ., .1. �, ., sn c !.. a
6 ,i Lir
't .
�.,• .�1..i;T- L� t - �';x L. .a.,; ">''rw,al��8r 1'F'':,;y � 1dT'njw L,r TM' Y!� �:-rf �•r,' -��° d�r'�•W, ,:L''I'. 3�'�:,: w'i,�" x'�°r'l, �,. �:H..,�gy
,'::y5"[I b a}er: � r i'S x d� z'1,� 's•a�':ti• +i - rr . - '� f .:F ,,� ✓T•° f } 4 L E. � .r �,:.5
dh ,„,, - .4 J i' S� , �' -r: _ lS a 4 j. , -,r. "_`y;` ' `. "42e ih• f i �. ,c W�
.'r3�'r „ rr�.�t H'4r r• w'.�3..1. �t a r -.r� ; xk' w,. ,' ..:a j. 'tF ., I.y, ,. _, r r 'b: - (_, r. ,� � .J, tl. J - '.,5 ' , �^',,v 'k. r.r �,�,: ,'�S ry 7'
;•6 "• ” 4 !. t . i' +. is ,:r'i Y.r�s gi7k M . a:R�y"p?:yj( fi: by y.t r{ , ,p, r 1 •:el dye, x+� r .,p L wi L,: .a. f.
,. 'Y. 7: ,,., r',',�RA lS ,•.j ew,{
��
.Lr>: *W!'t ..t <,+�:r.�y.: ✓�d. p;m,. bbYir.'�t,',ti..�'�kI', IG.. :ie%�� r: -t'- � Si•`$- 't�tf i'SF .t,'� ,.Yrq�k �, a�r,.�k �i,}',kl 'I �i'�4%--fel.,. � rt,. x"+ Y.'.:N.. ti7 ,1� �.-.. r:, •. .1. �1 [` e�'r - .,se,A,. 9:. „r '
3, . :..A-f?f .Y i ,.A^ ..i.� ^ •r'+r -r. �: u. } rvl � `g +si . p- � F �:: . o' v r. , r w. %' � � _' (".'Y,�'�#j .,+g r � . ky�;� i��„
•r•, ,� - �`r;,S >S .'' t• ..r .� ;,''7?: r, ,.', 'i 17rd.!'md'.Se't ' ''M`h. '^:% iJkxt'iT9 '�"rj_ v .r �" •gryi,:.�,,1�'.S',Kti (r•x r,i,j, Y't. wtr',,
y..r ';i7>:� Y � u�� �' 4,r-,".�' � w'.o1' x:` �' •{ ',3 i xf So •L.;",�`^� 1 � `•1 I ° :� . r: • .r, T5. "� r.,v+: }..��::5`', r. f .kr '�. ""i%e:..' S' ,.p;.'h �-7., -.row --
�. Y.3•`.'�1 g,h7s ,sa. r {" t! .I.M v,i - ff, - � �-n' F' 1J l r :t w`7 �- + ,h "• r:r.',i,
�, } '. .rya I,� "
S i ,t_ % • -'x: r. 1 fi ',r. �i' .. Iw ��1_ _fj k': Wj?t:',5f. 7t.r x+, '? " y : ;7. ,pi{'�r•` 4 "c"•�ii"`�'
�+ i df t'^e ', yd'- s:�i1P f rr:il„i�,. irr w">f: r Masr''r, .',i•''I ,p .: 3C.,HarF"i% rri•iC�''H . 'i?yJ'• '�"'`5:. ,�+'jL �7x4�. �/ �'_.!' `�-�''„ i�k,. J•'�dkSs, .1�. �.. y},.� + r�?�S, ,�;
{:'{•�.'ti' 'l :'�,f '+�'iR 9��1<�',a �:�'��. '�` �' ,T{? .r :ti V .,FK'i� :a �s�tb • i.. .}�r};:hi��: `.'�>rt• r. ,'tti•�f. x,a:-r �`:-w,.A �'-'r 'nr��Yv���.t.k,F 5�t! .1y -,f' �f` •S,?�'.d.`}y t .
,'S ''3" r F ;M:r' a . S. •.G r� ,�,;' 1yr a e. -t ,^.i. t.k'J�.S'�,. ks.. C 'iE,r 1 I"A: °.F fkkGl :, 1',v;r ,.rj"RS'. a r y:i..k w,7' y
',1 �K ` ,V-. '\ � 'F• x.} ry P v - 'r�u ,�.?r,;'Is: ',�lrr'._: �,a .'S, •r�: a. f, 's�wr r1'.,. �. h +., r's.- �{.. 7,i�x �. '�
J r ?� F r,4 L 4 x : .n• r.l - 7E $. e �'" <N��. '� '-J :.'� 5�, �'''` '"
R i'.,: - >r � x't' '6, • �1,GS [ ,, � t 4+s . C �. 4�g - �i 'r S�� ••,, Ia ry, l,. , a ti '-'�'�, U4 4 • � )w, p -'t_ � 1 f f�'i • •dA'
is '� � , a �f � x. i � , yA , 7 � �ai-i .y;p�"rf•,`'�'�'�M � r .s a ,� shit )ia ;lr.� a.,�ry�!�I s } ,r �'�'. • "t "1� � .�' ,c !� � / . +f 9' }y"i. td�r'2H �.l`.
,F!' ,�,;.y„ x �A. :f,1,�,�," 'z` *:� F.' �� •.�. F`''?.'{ �:
,.,�i' �"t'.., •J- ,� a,{� h..r .fir. n`�� j,.r'j,.a �. 'x. u t
[pias.-;:�,#i-*.Yy^S'-�'s: �>�;' �,.✓:. +'r. Gr+:i w� Graf x6• .nT',cy 0.d; ,tr ',f,r '"�`mf.1 w: ,y'' .c^.T�rrutl� 'w� gi+;�,�u' DOW
------------ •,7F_ '�y- 4x'P.r ¢ A '!�. t,
i•. a iR , rs r yrt• t• "� ' >.. r-1 7 9 v,' ' ' li'' ri 'K. S" i '� - :'4es7 '',i,, i� �N t, "I �., IJq -k�,,. 'N�t ',` ^ �',}�tift,.,. 't . "�`5�i ''C'ie' ,.1, ,'F
r^f , . .a T; ,',x r ,� i ,,,,ai t &+' 1 F' [Y X• 7•r'Ti• `2 E'' '':, .1 . Y+ I r y•-{ty{.,, �' r t. 5:y-' 3,.
rr Y ' Gtr k L mo-. u�'^_, i'.. _..._...,.�#.k.Fi.,.• g....,,T..r...—='f.i11�..`.ri'a....�' �:rorni�.f.}iny.<
ar..uS_-,. h:..n:• •»f.3rw.....iK�:r.F!s,_ �t.�. .r�r- +.�

0
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
inspection Data: 12/1312005 Inspection Type: Compliance tnspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 44001 i
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
0000
0000
Page: 6

f { • 0
Permit: AWC440011 owner-Faciilty: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
inspection Date: 12/13/2005 _ inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ■
Design? ■
Maps? ■
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑ ■
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Other Issues Tes no MA M
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12/13/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10°AoJ10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? Cl
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
i6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lark of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Com (Silage)
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Fescue (Pasture)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑❑■❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■fl❑❑
■
Page: 4

i
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Permit: AM440011 owner - Facility. H Dean Ross Facility
Number.
440011
Inspection Date: 12113!2005 . Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Q
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Q
■ Q
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■ Q
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
■ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Q
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8_ Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
0130
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
e
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA HE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
Cl ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Q
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

•
Permit- AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Facility Number -- 440011
Inspection pate: 12/13/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 250
Total Design Capacity:
Total 55LW:
200
280,000
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC440011 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Ha god _ Region: Ashpville� _
Date of Visit: 12/13/2005 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:45 A
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm
Owner: H Dean Rosi.
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 220 Bunny Run Ln _ Wavnes�ille NC 28786
Physical Address:
Facitity Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road
Integrator:
Latitude., 35'35'05" Longitude: 83"01'1$"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross Operator Certification Number: 21954
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Bexedy Price / Phone:
Inspector Signature:., 24A�� %y im _ Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:4/7/05 LSD N=7.2 lb/1000 gal B
Soil analysis: 12122/04, 2005 soil analysis has yet to be collected.
19.& 20. This facility is not yet permitted. Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District is revising the waste plan. As soon as
the waste plan is revised a permit application should be submitted. Mr. Ross has indicated that the farm should be certified for 300
head but the current certification shows 200 head. The waste plan must be revised before exceeding 200 head.
21. When permitted the following items will require documentation: 1) weather conditions at time of application, 2) weekly waste pond
freeboard levels, 3) waste transfers, 4) rainfall events -rain gauge must be installed, 5) waste pond inspections after a greater than one
inch rainfall & monthly, 6) crop yields, 7) stocking- monthly.
24. Waste application equipment must be calibrated
Record keeping is much improved since 2004.
Page: 1

�, , o` W A rFq
p7
•
i Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r
> y
`�
i
= ' .•tsf
rn(j`�"�; a
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources P
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 29, 2005
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
111 Owens Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 13, 2005, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the H. Dean Ross Farm. The maintenance and operation of the dairy appeared to be very
good.
I understand that Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation is revising your waste plan. When you
receive the new waste plan you should submit a permit application as soon as possible as you are
currently operating without a permit. You indicated that you would like to get certified for 300 head of
cattle. Your current certification is for 200. You must get the waste plan revised and re -certified if you
wish to expand above the current number. You should contact the technical specialist to ensure the
waste plan revision includes the increased capacity.
Your record keeping has improved greatly since your last inspection. There will be additional record
keeping requirements when your permit is issued. Please refer to the inspection report for a list of items
that will require documentation. As we discussed during the inspection, the approved reporting forms can
be found at the following address http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ndceu/Animal/StateGeneralPermitForms.xis
Lastly, your waste application equipment will require calibration. It is recommended that you contact the
Haywood County Soil and Water Conservation District for assistance with calibration.
Please see the attached inspection report for additional comments. Thank you for taking the time to meet
with me; your assistance was greatly appreciated. If you have any questions regarding this report or
need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Sail & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2490 U.S. Highway 70
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunolAEfjrmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
JhCarolina
Wura!!y
Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]

i 0
Mr. Ferguson
December 29, 2006
Page 2
stewardship of the natural resources in the Haywood County. If you should have any
questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,_, r
G. Landon Da tvDa dsonG7�""�
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
c: Leslie Smathers Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District
. J.R. Joshi AFO Unit Aquifer Protection Section
Q1
Q r -TI ;
C--Dp
l� Q
�:71
L�3
ii

O�OF W A T E9QG
is
co r-
• Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 27, 2006
Mr. Carlyle Ferguson
Board Chairman, Haywood County Soil and Water Conservation District
589 Raccoon Road Suite 203
Waynesville, NC 28786
Dear Mr. Ferguson:
The Haywood County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) Office has assisted the
dairies of Haywood County over the years with certification and permitting issues relating to
the 2T Rules (formally the .0200 rules), those regulating the farming community. The dairies
began receiving permits as early as 2000; however, some farms were certified but never
permitted. In some cases the Division of Water Quality has been requesting permit
applications as far back as 2000. Those without permits have indicated that they cannot
submit a permit application because they do not have a Waste Utilization Plan (WUP). I
understand that the Haywood District Office has been working to update WUP's for all dairies
in the county and that this is a labor-intensive process. The most recent WUP should be
submitted with a permit application. It is our hope that all dairies that require a permit will have
one as soon as possible. We feel that sufficient time has been given to everyone to submit the
required documents/paperwork to come into compliance with the applicable rules and
regulations. Any assistance that you could lend toward that goal would be greatly appreciated.
Specifically, we are awaiting W UP's for:
1. H. Dean Ross Farm
-',2. Triple R Dairy Farm
Earl Parkins & Sons Dairy
�4. Tim Smart Dairy
Three of the above farms as well as the Ross Dairy Farm have indicated that their waste plans
should be revised to reflect an increase in population above the current certification.
The Division of Water Quality's Asheville Regional Office appreciates the help that Haywood
SWCD has given to all of the farms thus far. We value the farming community and your
North Carolina Division of Water Quality— Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% RecycleV0% Post Consumer Paper
NonCarolina
atllralllf
[hone [phone]
FAX [phone]

• 0
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. bid the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. bid Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
o011❑
❑1900
01000
Page: 6

Page: 5
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility
Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12/1a/2006 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
f-1
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?SLU-P - I O , 5 t�I�R_�, o�
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?po,_�_ aoc_w
W
dO� U Mtn
Weekly Freeboard?
0
Transfers? 1*
Rainfall? 13 p k -
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
MGiC�'►
�'Y� •
" Tr /
� O C.JUSTL Q.��6-S 1" Col) �.l-
Waste Analys1s?5o,,MPte- SO Nota Ot°
L004
Annual soil analysis? %;�
Cl
Crop yields? jJv+ c1p1_✓gins ec3 0"' a�
T
x�
Stocking? 0�-
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0 gl ❑
U
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ®
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 004- dOCA""v464 Pt ❑ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? . 00 pt'r'^r�
11 El 0
[1
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? c.ke-c.k 6mko- 1005e—
❑ 93 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0 ❑ Yl
❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CA 7p,, 0 Q7
1� ❑ ❑
,�.IT-
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit AVVC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross facility Number : 441)011
Inspection Date: 1211B12006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN? () KL D
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? n n
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1 rr Tc +�l I "ic'rt
Crop Type 2 &AI SIA, t
Crop Type 3 w
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
�°
Soil Type 1 N a W WP -{-a ►�
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ n
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?IruLLPICAWrnp not (2144%/Itbh -9-- rycv;cw
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ D
KI
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 ®
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ W
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? fJol Perm` 4?,d ❑ 0 10 ❑
20. Does the facility flail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 50 n ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
�4.��-� tp—
ri[�vi Lt..
WUP? JA&- ad � j �S 'J
Page: 4

1 1 • •
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ IKE) ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Q V1 ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
R
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
F1
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
❑
❑
discharge? jun �et/4/ i�— SlilaSe /daGLae�e �. char.-, 0 S/"'. nr, d;sc�,..-3� e6se vcd
improvement?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment �� ��` �� t ` �`y``� p^� �ue� � , Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
woo
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ 9)
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ 04
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

•
Permit AVWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number. 440011
Inspection Date: 12!1812008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

•
Division of Water Quality
rAfJ
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Actin Permit: AM444D011 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Com li nce Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region: As-heville
Date of Visit: 1211-8/2006 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm Owner Email:
Owner: H Dean Ross Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd _ Waynesville NC 28785966Q,
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°35'05" Longitude: 83°01'18"
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 21954
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Dean Ross Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
! �7
0
96
J> -e- �6- 300
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number. 440011
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other ISSIIAC _
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Permit: AVVC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 1 211 8120 06 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ■
Design? ■
Maps? ■
other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ f_1 ❑ D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? Q
120 Minute inspections? Q
Weather code? ■
Weekly Freeboard? ■
Transfers?
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
Q
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■ D
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Q
f=1 ■
D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
❑ ■
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
D
❑ ■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
..11-- .-- _ v-_
n
n ■
.1_
❑
.'M
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ r 1 ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those f=1 ■ CY1 F1
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0 ■ 0 n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

E
E
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: K Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
fl
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
f7
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
11
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
Q
0
■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
171
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
■
0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
0
Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■
fl
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
■
Page: 5

If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
Permit: AWG440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility
Number :
440011
Inspection Date: 1211812006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from an
rg y part of the operation?
�
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
0
Other
Q
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
El
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■
Z. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
■
n
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
■
❑
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
■
0
11
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
T Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
)
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
fl
f_l
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
in
improvement?
11. Is mere evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 4

•
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 1 211 812 006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle
I Ji Cattle - Milk Caw 200 270
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
200
280,000
Page:3

Permit: AWC440011 Owner -f=acility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 44Uo11
inspection Date: 1211612006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
#3. Potential exists for silage leachate to drain from silo to branch. Recommend contacting Haywood Co. Soil & Water for technical
assistance to address potential run-off. No discharge was observed on the day of the inspection.
#14. Not evaluated - no WUP available for comparison.
#19. Facility is not permitted; noted during last two inspections.
#20. WUP not available for review. Haywood Soil & Water is updating WUP.
#21. When permitted, the following items will require documentation: 1)weather conditions at time of application, 2)weekly waste pond
freeboard levels, 3)waste transfers, 4)rainfall, 5)waste pond inspections after a greater than one inch rainfall & monthly, 6)crop yields
SOILS ANALYSIS HAS NOT BEEN COLLECTED FOR 2006.
Waste analysis collected in November 2006, results not yet available. No waste analysis to cover the March/April 2006 applications. A
WASTE ANALYSIS MUST BE COLLECTED TO COVER EVERY APPLICATION EVENT, THE WASTE ANALYSIS SHOULD BE
COLLECTED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF APPLICATION.
24. Waste application equipment has not been calibrated. Calibration will be a permit requirement.
Mr. Ross has indicated that his certificaton should be for 300 cows not 200. The WUP should be revised to reflect any increase in
capacity.
Waste application records (SLUR -1,2) were good.
Waste pond freeboard: 96 inches.
Page: 2

E
E Division of Water Quality
F] Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
0
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC440011 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Infection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/18/2006 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 11-00 AM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm
Owner: H Dean Ross
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd Waynesville NC 287859668
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Fane: Latitude: 35°35'05" Longitude: 83°01'18"
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Dean Ross
Operator Certification Number: 21854
Title
Phone:
Phone
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature:'%' ~'✓�� Date:
_ 1
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

wATF • •
�O /9Q COPY
Mirhacl E. Easley, Governor
REWilliam G.RaturalReources�J �f [[�� North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 29, 2006
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
111 Owens Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 18, 2006, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the H. Dean Ross Farm.
Your facility is operating without a permit. The permit application along with the most recent
waste utilization plan should be submitted for processing. This issue was noted during the last
two inspections. You have indicated that you would like to have the farm design capacity
increased from 200 to 300 milk cows. You should contact your technical specialist to ensure your
waste plan is certified for any increase in capacity.
Please refer to the inspection report (Inspection Summary Page 2) for additional comments and a list of
items that will require documentation when permitted. The approved reporting forms can be found at the
following address http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndceu/Animal/StateGeneralPermitForms.xls
The assistance of Mr. Ronnie Ross was greatly appreciated during the inspection. If you have any
questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly P�riice
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
c: Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
NOIYhcx'lina
Natitra lel, f
North Carolina Division of Water Quality— Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
IntemeL h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper

0 •
Permit: AWc440011 Owner - Facility: ii Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12/06/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
M. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 440019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑❑❑❑
0000
❑❑❑ ❑
Page: 6

r 0 •
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12106/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? St_t4,4 -Z t7jt� Si -GO -1 OIL
❑
120 Minute inspections? N P
❑
Weather code? G jC
❑
Weekly Freeboard? W O C"ec ur� nl� GJu �n r-� c~ ! n �'cf
❑
-e.
Transfers? N R
❑
Rainfall? 0
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? 0,1�
' �' L
❑
Waste Analysis?_5!%/07 L-_�L)` J / /�
✓
❑
Annual soil analysis? 51494T
❑
Crop yields? <
❑
Stocking? ()I_
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑
® ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? V14� +f
❑ 0
❑ Q
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? r41' 1v,d j(u"j
Q ❑
111 Q-:snk-
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? G 4(• de.� i
❑ 0
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? `�
❑ ❑
® ❑
VPC Nn
NO NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 111100
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ a ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

•
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12/06/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? j V— Q
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1 d,,p.[i✓1�"
Crop Type 2 4c-;-1 j1/, .t
Crop Type 3 [' j4rc .. -e r)-4,T�",
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
❑ ❑ ❑ ® NO wu.P
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E3
❑
❑
ulu,P
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
❑
N°
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? i,) 7EF w k
❑
10
❑
❑
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NI=
(�
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? No-, (�'{t�
@
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? jjb tb%ILLF
W
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
W
Page: 4

r • 0
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12106!2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ a ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO) ❑ ❑ W ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑ ❑
Z
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ @
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Q
❑
❑
discharge? Si 1A5c I�CcGtC �o��� Cfc cdC �J Nom �yo^��
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 7 '
❑ ®
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
❑ 49
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ 0
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 8
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ 1B
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ 9
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ 0
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? (J�
❑
Page: 3

s i
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12/0612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Inspection Summary:
iL 3
6W,3 73
Page: 1
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011
Facility Status: Active Permit:
AW_ C_440011 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
_ County: Haywood
Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/06/2007
Entry Tlime:10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross
Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: H Dean Ross
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd
Waynesville
NC 287859668
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°35'05"
P fP
Longitude: 83°01'18"
5R 1 3 2z-
Joe Carver Rd. off NC 276 Jonathan
Creek. SR 1323 Owen Road ibJ21ei, Fcr i,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross
Operator Certification Number: 21954
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name
Ronnie Ross
Phone: [phone]
On-site representative
Ronnie Ross
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
iL 3
6W,3 73
Page: 1

0 •
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: N Dean Ross
Facility Number :
440011
Inspection Date: 1210612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection f
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31 . Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑ ■
❑
Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
❑
0
Page: 7

• •
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number : 440411
Inspection Date: 12106/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? Q
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Q ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
Q
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
m
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
i
❑
Q
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
0
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
(]
■
0
D,
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

•
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Facility Number : 440011
Inspection Date: 1 210 6/200 7 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
0
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs,?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Q
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
0
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
D 11 Q ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D ■ Q 0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 ❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D ■ 0 n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ 0 Q
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ 0 n El
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■ ❑ Q 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
0
Page: 5

• •
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number :
440011
Inspection Date: 1210512007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1 _ Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
n
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
■
❑
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
1
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
n
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
0
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
Il•
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
00
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC440011
•
Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
•
Facility Number : 440011
Inspection Date: 12/08/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 273
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
200
280,000
Page: 3

0 0
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number : 440011
Inspection Date: 12!0612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
#3. Potential exists for silage leachate to drain from silo to branch. Recommend contacting Haywood Co- Soil 8 Water for technical
assistance to address potential run-off. No discharge was observed on the day of the inspection. In addition, cows have access to
Nelson Branch, Recommend BMP's to avoid potential water quality violations.
#14. #19. #20. No WUP available for comparison. Facility is not permitted; noted during last three inspections. Haywood S$W is
updating WUP.
#21. Weekly freeboard should be recorded in inches.
Freeboard: 84 inches /
Soils Analyses: 5/18/07
Waste Analysis: 5/16107 LSD N=4.8 Ib11000 gal. Broadcast; N=6.7 Ib/1000 gal. Incorp.
Mr. Ross indicated that his certification should be for 300 cows rather than 200.
The farm appears to be well maintained; good records.
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Awe _ _ Permit: AWC440Q1 1 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood _ Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/QQ/2007 Entry Time:1Q:QO AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM I Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm Owner Email:
Owner: H
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd Waynesville NC 28785966
Physical Address:
Facility Status: n Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°35'05" Longitude: 83°01'18" „
Joe Carver Rd. (SR 1322) off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road, right on Holstein Farm Rd
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross Operator Certification Number: 21954
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Ronnie Ross Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Beverly Pricce' Phone:
Inspector Signature: 1 �r ' "'9 Date: d +7 A 7
Secondary Inspectorisj:
N
Page: 1

�0F ArFRQ 6v Michael F. t:asley, Goveinor
C_ • — — • William G. Boss Jr.. Secretary
' r North Carolina Department of Environment and Naturai Resources
p Coleen 11. Sullins. Director
'qc�_ —,fw Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 7, 2007
Mr, H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
111 Owens Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785 0
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 6, 2007, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling system
for the H. Dean Ross Farm.
Your facility is operating without a permit. The permit application along with the most recent
waste utilization plan (WUP) should be submitted for processing. It is our understanding that
Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation is updating your WUP and will be submitting the
permit application on your behalf. This issue was noted during the,last three inspections.
Please refer to the inspection report (Inspection Summary Page 2) for additional comments. The
operation /record keeping appears to be very good.
The assistance of Mr. Ronnie Ross was greatly appreciated during the inspection- If you have any
questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
c: Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
J.R. Joshi APS AFO Unit
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
One
NoldiCarolina
r/�Ll�!lCfl��f
North Carolina Division of Water Quality —Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. l lighway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmaWe Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Page: 7
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Facility Number :
440011
Inspection Date: 12106/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n ■
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Q ■
❑
n
Page: 7

11
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number : 440011
Inspection Date: 12/0612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? fl
Design? rl
Maps?
Other?
21 _ Does record keeping need improvement? n Q 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? Q
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Yes No
NA
Nl^
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Transfers?
0
Q
29_ Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
D 0
Rainfall?
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall 8 monthly?
n
❑ ■
[1
[-
Waste Analysis?
0
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
f-!
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
ri
22_ Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
fl
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
0
■
Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q
M
0
f_1
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
Q
■
0
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
ED
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Cl
E3
®
0
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
Nl^
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ®
0
Q
29_ Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
D 0
fl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
[1
[-
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

11
•
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12106/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
❑
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 —
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q ■ ❑ Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ■ 171
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■ Q ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■ ❑ Cl n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

.i •
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
D
Frozen Ground?
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility. H Dean Ross Facility
Number.
440011
Inspection Date: 12/0612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge obserjed from any part of the operation?
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
0
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
®
it
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Q
Q
■
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
_ n
■
D
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
■
❑
0
El
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage B Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Q
■
0
0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
Q
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6, Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
0
Q
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Q
■
❑
D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
fl
■
Q
D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■
Q
Q
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
D
I]
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
D
Frozen Ground?
El
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: 4

r
•
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12/06/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 273
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSI_W: 280,000
Page: 3

Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number : 440011
Inspection Date: 12106/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
#3. Potential exists for silage leachate to drain from silo to branch. Recommend contacting Haywood Co. Soil & Water for technical
assistance to address potential run-off. No discharge was observed on the day of the inspection. in addition, cows have access to
Nelson Branch. Recommend BMP's to avoid potential water quality violations.
#14. #19. #20. No WUP available for comparison. Facility is not permitted; noted during last three inspections. Haywood S&W is
updating WUP.
#21. Weekly freeboard should be recorded in inches.
Freeboard; 84 inches
Soils Analyses: 5/18107
Waste Analysis: 5116/07 LSD N=4.8 lb/1000 gal. Broadcast; N=6.7 Ib/1000 gal. Incorp.
Mr. Ross indicated that his certification should be for 300 cows rather than 200
The farm appears to be well maintained; good records.
Pag e: 2

t ,
• 0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4411 — Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC440011 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In tin inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood _ Region: Asheville _
Date of Visit: 12/05/2007 Entry Time: 10.00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: H Dean Ross Farre Owner Email:
Owner: H Dean, Rosa
Phone:§28-22Q-3460
Mailing Address: i 11 Owens Rd Waynesville NC 287859668
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°35'05"
Longitude: 83`01'18"
.foe Carver Rd. (SR 1322) off NIC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road, right on Holstein Farm Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Dumber: 21954
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Ronnie Ross Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price' Phone: tj 8�11�'
Inspector Signature: /� �'Lc `�� Date: %� / Q 7
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

�oF warFgQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
�0 G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
5; North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section t
December 7, 2007
AQUIr r� r� ;, CFl710N
DEC 14 2007
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
111 Owens Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 6, 2007, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling system
for the H. Dean Ross Farm.
Your facility is operating without a permit. The permit application along with the most recent
waste utilization plan (WUP) should be submitted for processing. It is our understanding that
Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation is updating your WUP and will be submitting the
permit application on your behalf. This issue was noted during the last three inspections.
Please refer to the inspection report (Inspection Summary Page 2) for additional comments. The
operation /record keeping appears to be very good.
The assistance of Mr. Ronnie Ross was greatly appreciated during the inspection. If you have any
questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
X')"
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
C'. Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
J.R. Joshi APS AFO Unit
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
o=
N9 hCarolina
Aalurally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality— Asheville Regionai Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc us
An Equat OppomnitylAffirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

H. Dean Ross 44-11
0 •
Subject: H. Dean Ross 44-11
From: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:05:02 -0500
To: Jaya Joshi <[e-mail]>
J.R.,
I've reviewed Ross' application and the only thing I have questions about are some of the maps. Some of
the maps show fields highlighted with acreages listed that are not listed in the Planned Crops Summary
Table {Ex. Tract 10577 shows Fid. 2 at 14.69 Acres, Tract 1444 Fid. 2 with 1.79ac., Tract 331 Flds. 2
w/6.23 ac.,3 w/34.66ac., 5 w/14.27 ac., Tract 332 Fld. 2w/3.51 ac. and Tract 3632 Fld. 2 w/5.81 ac.
These extra fields might be buffers but the numbers don't seem to add up. Can you take a look?
Otherwise, this one looks good.
Bev
Bev Price - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Bev Price <Bev.Price c-6ncmail.net>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
I of 1 1/25/2008 l 1:04 AM

•
•
Permit: AVVC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12119/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit Routine
Yam No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DW4 of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6 -

Permit: AWC44001 1 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 1212912008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
'—'
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■ n 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Inspections after > i inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ D ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n ■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n 0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PIAT) certification?
n
rl ■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ ❑ n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■ n D
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n D
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: A%W440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number : 440011
Inspection Date: 12/29/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Q
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crap Type 3
- Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
n
Crop Type 5
n n
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q
■
❑ Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
o n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
0
n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Q
Page: 4

•
•
Permit: AWC440011 owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 1 212 9/2 0 0 8 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ 0
Cl
Discharge originated at:
Structure
fl
Application Field
n
Other
fl
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n ■ n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n ■ n
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n ■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n ■ n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ n
El
discharge?
_Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n ■ 0
❑
if yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑
❑
-erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n ■ 00
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Q ■ ❑
Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ n
n
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n ■ 11
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n ■ n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ [1 n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? Q
Page: 3

0
Permit: A=440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
•
Facility Number : 440011
Inspection Date: 12129/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle - Milk Cow 200 220
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW
200
280,000
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC44001 1 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _- County: ,Ijavwood Region: Asheville
Dat%ref-Visit:— 2/29/2908- Entry Time: 1Q:00 AM Exit Time: 11.00 AM
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm
Owner: H Dean Ross
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd Waynesville NC 287859668
Physical Address: 111 Owens Rd Waynesville NC 28785,
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 55'35'05" _ Longitude: 83°01'18"
Joe Carver Rd. (SR 1322) off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road, right on Holstein Farm Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
ij Otherlssues
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Ronnie Ross Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ed w rd/ rll' ms- Phone:
Inspector Signature: if .1r1 Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The facility appeared to be well maintained and the record keeping was in good order. The WUP has been completed by the
Haywood Co Soil and Water District. The WUP must be signed and submitted to Raleigh in order to receive permit and Certificate of
Coverage.
Waste analysis:
11/25/08 LSD Broadcast N=3.B lbs/1000 gal.
Page: 1

r
f �O �NA1F9 p + ltilichael F. Easley, Governor
' 0 G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
j, n +, =1l I , -1 1�,�i J �`,' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
111 Owens Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Aquifer Protection Section
December 29, 2008
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 29, 2008, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the H. Dean Ross Farm.
Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation has updated your WUP. A signed copy must be submitted
to Raleigh in order to receive your permit and Certificate of Coverage.
Please refer to the inspection report for additional comments. The operation /record keeping appears to
be very good_
The assistance of Mr. Ronnie Ross was greatly appreciated during the inspection. If you have any
questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (828) 2964500.
$;n>n relY,
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
c: Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste_ 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
J.R. Joshi APS AFO Unit
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
One
N1�9A Carolina
.Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1.877.623-6748
Internet: h2o.enrstate. nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAKrmative Action Employer - 50'b Recycled1t0% Post Consumer Paper

Permit AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 12/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
Q ■
❑
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ ■
Q
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
0
Page: 6

P
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facillty: H Dean Ross
Facility Number.
440011
Inspection Date: 12117/2009 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Inspection Date: 12/1712009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 440011
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (wheat.
barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ 11 ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency _
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6M440011 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Ro-utine County: Hood _ - _ Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 1211712009 Entry Time: IQ;QQALA Exit Time: 11,30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Qgap Ross Earm _ owner Email:
Owner: H.Degn Ross Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: I II Owens Rd- _ n
Physical Address: 296 Rolstein Farm Rd Waynesville NC 28785 _
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 85`35'05" Longitude:
Joe Carver Rd. (SR 1322) off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road, right on Holstein Farm Rd,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts ji Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents jj Other issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
4 Secondary OIC(s):
fOn -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
i 24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Ronnie Ross Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williarps f/' J Phone: 9
Inspector Signature: �. yv�"� - - -- — Date: 1` L U tri
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
' The facility appears to be well maintained and records are in good order.
Waste analysis: LSD Broadcast N= 8.4 Ibs11000 gal
soil incorp N= 11.8 lbs/1000 gal
Did not have waste analysis for spring applications
Waste storage pond had 60" freeboard
Page: 1

I
19A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
Mr. H. Dean Ross
H. Dean Ross Farm
111 Owens Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28785
Aquifer Protection Section
January 4, 2010
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
H. Dean Ross Farm — Facility # 44-11
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Ross:
On December 17, 2009, I conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the H. Dean Ross Farm.
Please refer to the inspection report for additional comments. The operation /record keeping
appears to be very good.
The assistance of Mr. Ronnie Ross was greatly appreciated during the inspection. If you have any
questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
c: Leslie Smathers, Haywood County Soil & Water Conservation District 589 Racoon Road
Ste. 203 Waynesville, NC 28786
J.R. Joshi APS AFO Unit
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION —Asheville Regional Office (ARO)
2090 U.S. 70 Highway, Swannanoa, NC 28778-8211
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-6623-6748
Intemet: www.ncwaterguali!y.orrr
An Equal Opportunity 1 AffirmAve Action Employer
Dee Freeman
Secretary
NorthCarolina
Naturally

0 •
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility : H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 07/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes NNaNe Nt
26. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
Crop yields? —
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
120 Minute inspections?
❑
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
Sludge Survey
❑
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
9 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
[❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below.
Other
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
If Other, please specify
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
❑
CAWM P?
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
[❑
❑ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No No—ft
26. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
[❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
[❑
[❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
page: 4

i •
Permit: AWC440011 Owner- Facility : H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
inspection Date: 07/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 1 CG r n �a -
Crop Type 2 �� a
Crop Type 3 v�
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ✓
Checklists?
Design? /
Maps?
Lease Agreements? /
Other? ,
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
/
Rainfall? /
Stocking?
Yes No Kii No
NE.,11■ ■
Yes No Ne No
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC440011
•
Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 07/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
® ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑]
❑ ❑
Structure
❑
Excessive Ponding?
Application Field
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Other
❑
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
[]
1B ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
R ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Total Phosphorus?
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
N91 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
09 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
& ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storaue & Treatment
Yea
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
E5 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
® ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
19 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
® ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
® ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
& ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
9] ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑]
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 2

0
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: Active
Permit AWC440011
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Haywood Region:
Asheville
Date of Visit: 07103/2014 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:30
am Incident #
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm
Owner Email:
F
Owner: H Dean Ross
Phone:
828-926-3460
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd
Waynesville NC 287859668
Physical Address: 295 Holstein Farm Rd
Waynesville NC 28785
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35° 35' 05"Longitude:
83' 01' 18"
Joe Carver Rd. (SR 1322) off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road,
right on Holstein Fame Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross
Operator Certification Number:
21954
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Co 4 re_r 11�,� 2 S -7
page: 1

Permit: AWC440011
Owner - Facility : H Dean Ross
L
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 07/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No ya No
Crop yields?
❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
Sludge Surrey
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
■ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
[]
Other
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
If Other, please specify
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑
CAWM P7
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M D
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yea
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
e ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWM P7
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

•
Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility: H Dean Ross Facility Number 440011
Inspection Date: 07/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste_Applicatign
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (wheat.
Barley.
Oats)
❑
Crop Type 4
❑
Maps?
Crop Type 5
Lease Agreements?
❑
Crop Type 6
Other?
❑
Soil Type 1
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
Soil Type 2
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Soil Type 3
Waste Application?
❑
Soil Type 4
❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil Type 5
Soil analysis?
❑
Soil Type 6
Waste Transfers?
❑
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
Stocking?
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[]
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
[]
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
n
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC440011
Owner - Facility : H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 07/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Excessive Ponding?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
Structure
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Application Field
❑
PAN?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
Other
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

•
Permit: AM"001 i Owner - Facility : H Dean Ross Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Date: 07/03/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle
LE Cattle - Milk Cow 300 257
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
page: 2

0 Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Active
Permit AWC440011
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region: Asheville
[late of Visit: 07/03/2014 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:30 am Incident #
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm Owner Email:
Owner: H Dean Ross Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd Waynesville NC 287859668
Physical Address: 295 Holstein Farm Rd Waynesville NC 28785
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 35'05" Longitude: 83° 01' 1 B"
Joe Carver Rd. (5R 1322) off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road, right on Holstein Farre Rd.
❑ Denied Access
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross Operator Certification Number: 21954
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The facility appears to be well maintained and the records are in good order.
page: 1

NO�QYv�I�Y oZOI,�— �}.►-(� �hf(.t �i.C/f�i. �/i��n �l y� U1Qa-CST � cS4tl Ytl'Yi°i.irrin� �li�-P�-4f<
A{ 44t;s / 1I (J J 1 - (�/ -� .� 1�1�
- 11�` �iiL�/ �O r7Ct t!i =fir re -.5 �/ ir7tf [.+�5'�`(Z A+4?Aj � Irkf-P1eo► � !
be rescsn�cd w�e� �-� u.As�E Co. �o�A.1 ;S —P1ec Co•.�F►c 4 L
��I i�:Obcf � ` �l�:ak� �vnS• Oi37r:ct �'o� ssisJa ce. A14e,-na ;vJ 'P", r'. " M Z`
I Yl
YYVWt 6( t'cyc��,d(�d,` p_r�oo CtnStLrC, t�� 4t.
TO `', reILL-es`! �y'r rLSCisT�UNJ tS �CS$ 4Cirl mo spy dJ
WaSc (kna[�scs ate re� u�„l Wil 0 ci l�x�vc 0,2 Ac`l r?cfif�gN. n18
SCAS QnA��SI S i S dLCE.n 0.1 5� ( r
Gl� � S {-� Spr: n(S q*
ReviewerlInspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
fct-
�e
Phone:
Date
Facility Number: liq- • Date of inspection: 742 4
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit`?
F-1Yes'R
No
❑ NA [:]NE
�►/a311S 11/ay�ts 1�� grand
25. Is the acility out of com lia cc with permit conditions related to sludge'? If yes, check
[:]Yes
0 No
NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
O No
W NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
]�
IYI No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
TTT
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes[WEV
No
❑ NA E]NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
NO�QYv�I�Y oZOI,�— �}.►-(� �hf(.t �i.C/f�i. �/i��n �l y� U1Qa-CST � cS4tl Ytl'Yi°i.irrin� �li�-P�-4f<
A{ 44t;s / 1I (J J 1 - (�/ -� .� 1�1�
- 11�` �iiL�/ �O r7Ct t!i =fir re -.5 �/ ir7tf [.+�5'�`(Z A+4?Aj � Irkf-P1eo► � !
be rescsn�cd w�e� �-� u.As�E Co. �o�A.1 ;S —P1ec Co•.�F►c 4 L
��I i�:Obcf � ` �l�:ak� �vnS• Oi37r:ct �'o� ssisJa ce. A14e,-na ;vJ 'P", r'. " M Z`
I Yl
YYVWt 6( t'cyc��,d(�d,` p_r�oo CtnStLrC, t�� 4t.
TO `', reILL-es`! �y'r rLSCisT�UNJ tS �CS$ 4Cirl mo spy dJ
WaSc (kna[�scs ate re� u�„l Wil 0 ci l�x�vc 0,2 Ac`l r?cfif�gN. n18
SCAS QnA��SI S i S dLCE.n 0.1 5� ( r
Gl� � S {-� Spr: n(S q*
ReviewerlInspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
fct-
�e
Phone:
Date

Facility Number: A
15- _* Date of [ns ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
0 NE
Identifier: LPh�g RJ
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
Spillway?:
the appropriate box.
Designed Freeboard (in): 1A
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
[]Other:
Observed Freeboard (in)- Ij
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[A Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
b. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
(� NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 11�ej> C 4/1 /1 j N=- 7 t12 l-6/000 �-4i ,
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
[] NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
7�
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Flydraulic Overload p Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > i O% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Fi lure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Chir n S i lad -4— L�; J6R.�e �t�� ( inti A P14wt)
i
13. Soil Type(s): „�� Vr b SQ J v a4,weivilLe-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
lb. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ NoNA [:]NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
0 NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? I f yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
[]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[A Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[:]NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [Waste Analysis W Soil Analysis
[:]Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(� NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 11�ej> C 4/1 /1 j N=- 7 t12 l-6/000 �-4i ,
214/2015 Continued

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /141 Arrival Time: cj ; p Departure Time: O County: ,d Region:l�
Farm Name: 14_ ,if&& �Z055 �j^ yM Owner Email: / a I. p
R atit OwnerName: N , DfAW R p S � Phone:
r
Mailing Address: [)U1Pr.S RJ. 10A,nQSu�
Physical Address: 29
Facility Contact: Ro nr1 j e Eo:is Title:
Onsite Representative: garini-e— Rd %5
Certified Operator: 4obtj D. ROSS
1/o NG ;z
Sal- 6;77
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: 9S /�D�Sf C� FA'Al PJ, Latitude: 35.35.05
Longitude: 5.3.61,/,0
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes IV No 0 NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
�-- Design CurrentDesignCnrrent
n
-""Design Current
See
C p tt�Pop�",° Wet P ultra Capacity Pop..
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow too
Wean to Feeder
I INon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish�"°"-
"
.� -..
Dairy Heifer90
Farrow to Wean``
Design -Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
©�, P�oult , . Ca aci PoP.
D
Non-Dairy
+I I Farrow to Finish
_
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
E]NE
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
-Turkey Poults
Other
ElOther I .
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes IV No 0 NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
V] NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
10 NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d_ Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes. notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
4NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Ix No
0 NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NNo
0 NA
E]NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Permit: AWC440011
Owner - Facility : H Dean Ross
Facility Number. 440011
Inspection Date: 07/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Ha No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M
❑
❑
waste management or ciosure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M
❑
❑
i maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC440011 Owner - Facility : H Dean Ross Facility Number. 440011
Inspection Date: 07/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
F6Cattle - Milk Cow 300 0
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
DisignaWd Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Dale Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WASTE STORAGE POND 21.60 B0_00
page: 2

■ Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El
Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011 Facility Status: ru,uvC
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Permit: AWC440011 Ej Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Haywood Region: Asheville
Date of visit: 0712712016 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 11:15 am Incident #
Farm Name:
H. Dean Ross Farm
Owner:
H Dean Ross
Mailing Address:
111 Owens Rd
Physical Address:
295 Holstein Farm Rd
Facility Status:
❑
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Waynesville NC 287859668
Waynesville NC 28785
1111111 Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 35'05" Longitude: 83° 01' 18"
Joe Carver Rd. (SR 1322) off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road, right on Holstein Farm Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Hobert D Ross
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Other issues
■ Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 21954
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross Phone [phone]
On-site representative Ronnie Ross Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:2` 0
Date: 7
inspection Summary:
November 2015 - dairy shut down; within approximately a year, expect to sell remaining heifers. At this time, they do not anticipate
re -starting the dairy operation. The permit may be rescinded when the waste pond is properly dosed - please contact the
Haywood Co_ Soil & Water Cons. District for assistance. Alternatively, the permit may be rescinded prior to closure of the waste
pond if the average size of the confined cattle herd, calculated on an annual basis during the 3 yrs. prior to the request for
rescission, is less than 100 confined cattle.
21. Waste analyses ae required within 60 days (before or after) application. No analysis for Spring 2016 applications.
Soils analysis is due.
page: 1

Facili Number: JDate of Inspection: tt
7
❑ NA
[:]NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
15<No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: -
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
0 No
NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other_
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative`?
34_ Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes t< No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ED NE
❑Yes �No E] NA [3 NE
❑ Yes t4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
[:]NE
❑ Yes
5?1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
[1] NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
/1,0✓ft4l,,✓' 1_W5 &I 6X -T CaWAJ,
/k/6 (moi a S % c CG�Q p /r�CQ %7a7J s— N C_e- .5/4 V f �� ► �o
wv_a,&� -t4CE"(<1 -7
WA� b<— _�S V d
A&A -A Co-Vn.s % A ov, �kG -+q tj ep)o-� 4
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
2/4/2015

Facili Number: - is of Inspection:
❑ Yes
IV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
Structure I Srtructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ NA
Identifier: �Ql"i f�K1
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ NA
Spillway?: l4e-f --
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes
14 No
Designed Freeboard (in): /. $$ f
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
PC No
Observed Freeboard (in): i
❑ NE
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`?
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
152 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aoolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceep�tabblle Crop Window ❑ Evidence
`of -Wind Drift
y ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): L�/4.a�J /�� I" �` �I / A e �,A-5e �' ( ~—OFF* 9
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
IV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
LK NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
❑Other -
ther:21.
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
[ IWUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design p Maps p Lease Agreements
❑Other -
ther:21.
2 1.Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
J4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield [:1120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'?
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
PC No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 214/1015 Continued

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: r j��� Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: County: *"E�d Region:
Farm Name: I�{, � /�, {��'i Owner Email: hD q.T /1 t�'VEY <P—!k 4106L C *-
Owner Name: l7�- ���S Phone:
Nailing Address: 24U AX1qAaJU N&— IAG &1973 6L
Physical Address: 176— #1S i ! �� � �Ccy/ZQ-�t�l� tom' a%[� �78L!�,
Facility Contact: )(.e, Title: —
Onsite Representative:n?� %�SS
Certified Operator: jbLcs�J� �,
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: 4=;19 Latitude: C3,52P_ Longitude:
87'.07,/8
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Fieid ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2, is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 5Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NF
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
DestgtCurr�;tt_DesignCurrent
[DNA
❑ N E
`Design Currenf =
® No
Swtn` a " ' Capacity` ' Pop+ " Wet Poultry
Cap city Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
K No
Wean to Finish
❑ NE
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
-
"�yjyqultt.
Design Current
am . aei Po
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
NEI
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Fieid ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2, is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 5Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NF
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[DNA
❑ N E
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued