310835_Inspection_20180320

j U Division of Water Resources j
Facility Number - �J T 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
lype of Visit: (-rUompliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visitouti�ne 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: [s 3 / to /��i' Arrival Time: (n'f Departure Time: 1 ( County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: I✓ r l (y t`i t //�o J�i c-A
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
=R;
Wean to Finish
W o Feeder
eeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: I r 6 S
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
NNon--
La er
Design Current
Dry Pmdtry Canarity Pnn_
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Broad Caw
❑ Yes ❑ No n NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[-]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,—❑,,, NNoo 777 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Nit2ber: 31 - , Date of Inspection: -4e
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 010 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q-go ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes K ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
JJ ' o l I NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EJ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
r>No
❑ NE
IS. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No� NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑'No u NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑-5o❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking [:]Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23 If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 21412015 Continued

Facility Nrimber: 5 / - jr' 37 jDate of Inspection: Zc
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [:J° ❑ NA Ej NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
Yes [3'1To NA Ej NE
Yes ❑ No M NA ❑ NE
Ej Yes No NA ❑ NE
El Yes �-.Ko ❑ NA Ej NE
Yes Ej No NA ❑ NE
Yes E5'<o NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP9 ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? Ej Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes
IoEj NA D NE
[ fNo Ej NA NE
EJ'No NA NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendationsrorany other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name: l /'r v ` (1 e.' --e l/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: P D -7'7j 73a y
Date: L o
21412015