980026_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 15, 1997
Robert Hinnant
Robert Hinnant Farm
8465 NC Hwy 42 W
Kenly NC 27542
Subject: Removal of Rez;stration
Facility Number 98-26
Dear Robert Hinnant:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an active animal
waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required'to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poul= with a liauid waste system
30.000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] eat 502.
-PVR
cc: -` gli-W 606&Quali'tf.Regioial.Oicict'
Wilson Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard. Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

,:`'3s_°''tk�k �k �k ik sir ikik Erik ik +Ir iIF ii kik ilr ik�*iFik �k ik ik ik ik �k it it sir � �r sir ik +k�ik'�r t4 �Ir ik �k ik tM tF * ak �k �lr +fir �r �Ir �Vr i8r �Ir ilr �k it �k �F �k * �Ir �4 �Ir ak �Ir
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
-RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
December 10, 1997
TO Water Quality Compliance Unit
FROM Charles Alvarez, Env. Eng.
Through Judy Garrett, Water Quality Supervisor
SUBJECT Farms Appropriate for Delisting
The following farms have been inspected by the Raleigh Regional
Office and are appropriate for.removal from the Animal Inspection
Database.
19-11 Mitchell Angus Farm, pasture cattle operation
19-30 Gerald Thomas Farm, under threshold, 50 dairy cows
51-69 Denning's Durocs & Yorks, under threshold,--43 pigs
98-31 J.F. Scott Farm no animals on site, design cap. 150 pigs
98-26 Robert Hinnant, 30 pigs on site
98-25 Walston Egg Farm, no animals on site
68-47 Pammard Farms, 60 beef cattle on site
93-16 Seven-G Farms of Warrenton, no animals lagoon closed out to
NRCS specs.
51-95 James Pope Farm, 4 pigs on site
Signed removal forms are included for 68-47, 98-25, 98-26 and 98-
31.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health. and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality a
Now
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1D1HHNFZ
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E„ Director
April 3, 1997
Robert Hinnant
Robert Hinnant F
8465 NC Hwy 42
Kenly NC 2754
Dear Mr. Hinnant:
Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Robert Hinnant Farm -
Facility Number 98--26
Wilson County
You were notified by letter. dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone]. .
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File .
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, 'N1t) C
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmcrhve Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

..... _ _ _._.._.... ...... __._-------..
❑ ] C Animal Feedlot Operation Review
ODWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
JURoutine O Complaint O Follow-u� of D«VQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
�mi niww�nwwrr i
•Date of Inspection lLl l.l�1
Facility Number ��
Time. of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered © Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
CC `I
Farm Name:...��,:�7.�✓f.....f�.`�n.�7..!��::f...,..��lz.�............ .. County .......��..� 5...�......................... .......................
p G J
Owner Name:..!`".1�.. .. 1 ....../..��...f. �'i..?,. f�..ex..., Phone No:...,./...9..4..Z,R. ... sy...............................................................
Facility Contact: ?r}: .. „r.......................... ....... Title Phone No
r f /
Mailing Address: �..........`s W .....�`1 7-,!...X...... ..............( ,/ /... ............... .I— C.......... '2..')-1)— Z- .........................
Onsite Representative:.. s A. L...................................... Integrator: ........ `10�—Jk*�................................................... .........
Certified Operatorr............... ............................ . Operator Certification Number,........................................
Location of Farm: `. !f ,, � jAr 4,-, /T
................................
................ ....... .. ............... ....... .......................... ..... .. ........................................................ ........I. 7
Latitude • 4 44 Longitude �' ' "
Design : Current Design Current Design . Current
Swine Capacity ,Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I I❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I I❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ID Other
arrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
General /
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes !O
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`'
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow ill gal/min?
(1, Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
ElYes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ YesZo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ILI o
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed`? ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush l'itsLetc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ...........'. V............. ......................................................................................................................................... .............. I ...............
.......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes Ed N
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes N
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes /,io
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type/''71.t?.j�il..�.:s.................................................................................................................................... ................................................:............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan ( WMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ��0 � 0 ❑ Yes Co
18, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes 'Co,
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes L� N
22, Does record keeping need improvement'? ❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were a additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [I No
25. re any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No. violations or. deficiene'ie's.rvere'note'd-during thisvisit.:You.W'ill receive no'further
Oerespandeh6 about this:visit.
Comcnents.(refer t"&stion #) ;Explain any YES answers and/or atiy,'r- commendations or --any other comments., {
Use drawings of facility to better explainttuatevtas (tse additional pages as necessary)T
. ... _. b_..
�Lio r � s i9 ✓[.�2Y S�s9-!/ /—�1 c;/�'f�/ . T/� �2.v11 WJ 1 � �'�.GDFr•.., e.,� �
-�- � ,� �' �I-I. � ,T �%q c_, 1. � 7 � t r 2 •M-, a� � !=�/�� C q� � % �K ..
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
> _ x
a,b
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .G�
L
-
Dale: ,/ t'�j I?/. %r%

(Date)
�r
Mr. Steve Tedder,- Section Chief
Water Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N. C. 27626-0535
Subject: Removal Request (Facility No. ( -r'" }
Concentrated Animal Feedlot Registration
Dear Mr. Tedder:
As of �Za —5( ? ^% (date) , I am providing the following
information to you for your review:
Farm Name/Owner_ bz�e�� 1`�t'rr1 tit xlhLo
Mailing Address�!4�y 4 Cf 2r L(J+-e-1'-
County LA-3 i o A,}
Facility Locati onZ�,J 4--c- I'— -_
Type of Operation:
Swine ✓ Poultry Dairy
Beef Cattle Sheep Other
Number of Animals on site "Yt7 ISes.ign Capacity
I am fully -aware that should the number of animals increase beyond
the thres-hold limit of 2S a , I will be required to register with
the Division of Water Quality. Based on the above information, I
request to be removed from the registration list.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,

WC Animal Feedlot. Operation Review`M V A
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up (if 1AV .y inspection O Follow-up of DSNVC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facilitv Number
Time orinspection 4 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Titne fin fraction trf hours
Farm Status: &Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex -.L25 for I hr 115 nun)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
❑ Not O erational Date Last Operated: ....................... ........... I ................. I ......... . . ...... ...............
FarmName:.................................................................... County:....... rly/L.( ,...........................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:...........,.........,......,..........................................................
Facilitv Contact:...................................................... ... Title: ....................... 4........................................ Phone No:
Mailing Addre s:................................... .....
Onsite Representative:.&.8.. T....A&W-4.*.1 ....... Integrator ............................................................
CertifiedOperator' .................................................. .............................
Location of Farm:
...........................................................................................................................
..... Operator Certification Number: ..........................
Latitude �•����� Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify, DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes �dNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

y
r Facility Number. —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): ruct�wl
...... ..!....I .............
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
1
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
00 No
❑ Yes
E1&o
Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ Yes O'No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes )410
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DVVQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
21yes
El No
Waste Application
14. Is there evidence of over application?
[],Yes
physical
(If in excess of WMP, or ru off/entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
94
15.
Crop type _COA'O...... ..'.......�� ... ...N.......................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[�Vo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
WNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
A No
19, Is there a lack of available waste application, equipment? RfYes
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes�No
No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes /No
For Certified Facilities On]
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name erg. 9��Fg
�s• ��`�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
... n;... �..... _r w,..._ n.. 1:.., t,v .__ n.. 1:. c .: .. c_ :r:.:. A r:._.. AP)AH1Y