930034_PERMIT FILE_20171231

21- tS
Type of Visit: eO Com ce Inspection U Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: E�Arrival Time: Departure Time: : po County:
Farm Name: IV "C- Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: t-4,61 j4/L►Q e- / Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Region:
Integrator: a f �y{r ,,_s
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharzes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? I ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesVN❑NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412015 Continued

r
Facili Number: 113ate of Inspection: w
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes <No❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): "', 6 !'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
0 Yes
EZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
ZOO
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environments
rest, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
to ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
/No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ NA
0
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding '❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
r^
12. Crop Type(s):- .f,Q
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
0 Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAW MP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [—]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V5No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers C] Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ElMonthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili 'Number: - Date of Inspection: r/(�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesgNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[3 NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
S jti ds elit rt/QY fi- 2'7-(7
aa- wv�i�l 1 1�.r�ar�G.�_s . Q d k ci�xlr Sp rr►�� C41-1112 y
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Phone: 1 l q-1q( Y 20p
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i3usf-fl.Q (Owl// Date:,
Page 3 of 3 .21412015

P -/7 -17
(Type of Visit: PrRoutine
pliance Inspection V Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
sit:Reason for Vi0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 'j 17 . Arrival Time: G ( Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: W c- r—A o, #-2-- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: " /'q-At— L r} 2�1
y
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current Desin. Current
Design Current
Swine
apacgsw
C*apacity Pop. Wet Poultry ty Pop.
fc.
Otid Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
2-00
00 Non -La er
I
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Feeder to Finish
p D
S"
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. P,aultr, C•a�ac'it P.o
La ers
Non-Dairyp
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
F
lBeef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (Iryes, notify DWR) [:]Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence ora past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 21412015 Continued

Facility Humber: jDate of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? +
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z ��
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Z'No NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`?
❑ YesVND
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit`?
❑Yes
NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Z <No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
� 12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E o ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
WNo❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2 KNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No❑ NA
❑ NE
Required
Records & Documents
t9.
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall InspectioZ/011
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

(Facility Number: - . C Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes [:]No
[:]Yes [:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any`addittonal recomme6dati6ns,0r,any other comments r
Use drawings of facility to better explain situationsluse�ad"ditional "pages as necessary).
y N1, 6'e SL< y
D 7- G <<
r7, 60 ,,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
/d._ 22 --/�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , (,
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: r� l
21412014

-q - /G
Type of Visit: ,0 Com ante Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:/
%
Departure Time: F.'t County:
FarmName:
QI1-.
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone. -
Onsite Representative: Mfr r �y� qua / r 10+,% Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
!Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wet Poultry
La er
Design Current
C city Pop.
C►attle
Dairy Cow
Design Current
C►flPE y Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Dr, P,oultrF
Layers
Design
C•aacit
Current
P,o P.
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Pullets
Other
Other
IF
Turkeys
TurkeyPoults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
�No
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
Ef NA
❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
❑ YesrNoo
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

f
lFacility Number: 9 3t Date of inspection. F
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o - NA FINE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t t, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes;No
Na NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
l l . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): _('6>-R_
13.
Soil Type(s):
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crap and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes2"o
NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required
J
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? I ryes, check
[] Yes
VNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking[] Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer torquestlon'#): Exlam any IYES`answers and/or any additional reeoiriimendations or any other�cottiments
Use drawings of facility;to befter explains tua.`tioiis (rise additiogal `ages;as necessary),
C5'4 I I
5"/,,t C/y_ 5'cl� rvz '*-/ 10- (9, - /-j- 0 1, OP F41 ( aa /'J�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: %,I E - -( ZO a
Date:
21412015
Page 3 of 3

3 - 29 - 1--Ir
Iiype or visit: tp gown nce inspection tJ vperacion tceview v 5rrucrure Evamanon v iecnmcai Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 628 2!, & 7-- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: 6 �j t I7 i'►') 6 vs Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
ILayer
IDairy
Cow
Wean to Feeder
[Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
7DNesn Current
Dr. P,oultr it P,o
La ers
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
7NO
n-La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Poults
Other
Region:
Discharges_ and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify.DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. ' Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ V Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Nufmber: a 3-3 jDate of Inspection: r/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, cheek
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑Yes
No NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations o=rfany other mme�nts le `?
Use=drawings of facility to"better explain situations (use additional ages as necessary). '
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7 1 _- Z 219C
Date: r? — /Y —
21412011

FaNity Number: - Date of Inspection: r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[:]Yes
❑ NA
VN
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ZfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
12 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environments reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
/NoO
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[] Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o [D NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Rewired Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ YesVNo❑
NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

q `j-t'y
Date of Visit:Arrival Time: D Departure Time: 1La f County: Region:
Farm Name: �" iV. Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design C►urrent
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
.Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
Dr, P,oultr. Ca aci P,o
Layers
D Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stacker
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Puilets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Turkey Pouits
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes Of No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[:]Yes
P-NO ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
[] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
T ❑ NA
TTT"'
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
[] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in);�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes�No A ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): tSco .5—& .e
13. Soil Type(s): / .
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
©N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ YesONo
NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Tre
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall InspectiSludge
Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 12 jZt
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
25. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No 6 NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 L Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer: to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.:
LTse`_drawzngs,offacility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).'
4P6.2odl r_o2t,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Bte .S AAL 7BL,%C--,l
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 2 V—(zZ-0 O
Date: L
21412011

3
Type of Visit: Q Com cc Inspection U Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: G 1 Arrival Time: / Departure Time: _ =County:
Farm Name: iV't'yL Owner Email:
Owner Name: M.4 ^4 t I✓ �� , Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,o_ultr.
C•.a acl
P,oINon-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZfNo I NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3YesVNo❑NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) (—]Yes IAY ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ere any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were th
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No . A ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) — /
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �O ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
—I
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes J�NO
❑ NA
[3 NE
maintenance or improvement?
ll��
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cie s64e_ L,
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes rNo❑
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
,
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[]Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes VN
�
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectiFNo
Iudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

f '
Facilit Nulmber: - .3 jDate of Inspection: / G
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes NVNo
❑ NA [3 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations,or;any.other comments -V
Use drawings of facility to better exRlain situations (use additional pages as necessary).. ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �j(,� 14CA' `rl-„
Page 3 of 3
Phone: rJ�'jal —4/2ya
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit .compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
'0
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ` : iU Departure Time: /2— ,3G County: �w���) Region:
Farm Name: AI f u6�X l�i:r�rn�S�. 2 Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ 1 4ct-A, En '*/ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = d 0 « Longitude: 0 ° = ' 0
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
El Wean to Finish ,T
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
Non
-La er
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Structure ❑Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes FerNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ Yes
❑'fVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — 3 Y Date of Inspection
i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
2rYes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes WNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [:]Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l o lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of
Area
12. Crop type(s) �fC �P 44,
-
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
_ZYes ,lo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes L3-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to guestio.tfi#) Explain any YES xansviers and/or an_y recommendationsor,
any,othen comments -i '
Use,deiWin s offacili to:better ezl lain situations., uiCadditional a es as°necessa
g. ty P ( p g Y)'
'i ; _1 ii.Ci Yi'.! i..�• d a :-r �N6i:,1 «. i.
# Sr n p l ,.n o 7F A-OA 4 srn S
A'Pr MY
Reviewer/inspector Name � � � > .0 �'� � ` ?fig `*f . Phone: %��% �1— j'1CU
!�E �. ��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2 — 2 3 —lG
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 2-2,3— 1r'
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WDp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
_0'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
DNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
,_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
E5-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional,Coinmentsa'ndlor,Drawings �. ,` ¢'.°;g'.. il.'V All
II #
P Z
Csa
Lr✓of)-e Ape/Y,
r rir 2 2,
-7�07 _cf3- 2
Page 3 of 3 12128104

e
Type of Visit Ja-Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit S2'koutine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: /2=3G County: LIc-2�/Region:
/—G/
Farm Name:AY,�l!^ �ff2 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: _
Facility Contact: ,
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = I ❑ Longitude: = ° = , = N
Design
Current
Design C►urrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population
Wet Poultr.,y Capacity Population
Cattle Ca-arc�i�ty Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
C J 10 d
❑Non -La er
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
2 3
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
-Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
Zko
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
P'`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
JO'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

Faci[iy Number: 9Date of Inspection 7-O
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ,0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes E3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,liJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ?'&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ;3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? ,,(
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .fl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) l�oS[�.P //c
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
12rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
ReviewertInspector Name �GIvP f Phone: /9' 7 9/- `/Z ec
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: .?7—oS
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 93 -3y Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ,El'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes P'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ g Other
p
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ,ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes El"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes [E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ,EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ,[allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes J2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ,21'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
L`No
❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,2fNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Coiii'ments and/or Drawin s _ � 4 � ' J
gsV
11
�YO„tlyJrf
3
A- 2, 9
Z ;7
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number
Division of Water Quality Yo o-3
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Z Compl' ce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �� Arrival Time: ��5 D I Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: � 4 _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator•
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Region:
Latitude: = 0 0 6 Longitude: = ° = t
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
II ❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stockei
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Zf"No
NA
ElNE
Discharge originated at: El ElApplication Field ElOther
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑,NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
A
❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
jYesN
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents Records & Documents _ ►
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists
Mn . ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. LiYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rain Inspections G Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes o NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesPNo[:]
A ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i
❑ Yes No� NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
P.rZ C'4 P !i,z— 4-o S C_ L 1= r 4 ce4 ., v-lz .
(b 947 ��k� r��/�� �P ��►re r� c= �css -�-�n y�,
!-! W- U 11 l C ., o �= �k rya w �- pe .,1,
12128104

Facility Number: — L Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes VNo
NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA ElNE
[IYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �El
NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No NA [I NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > l 0% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Driii ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) r�
13. Soil type(s) l'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
;/N�NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'?❑ YesVNoNA
A
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YesA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name G e7„-.j � Phone;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Nuinber I q E�—�j
ip Division of Water Quality f�`FGrc�
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit 45 Comp' ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �nArrival Time:
Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: it19 /r f� „•_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
r-
Certified Operator: M P` rt n_
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: = 0 = = « Longitude: 0 ° 0 g = f4
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
I! I❑ Layer
D Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dair Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ,❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes koEIN,A
A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNA
❑ NE
El Yes N ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Na NA
El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Oe/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
ldNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa -notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes ❑ NA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �5oC] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X
NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
r
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [--]Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
!CJ N ❑ NA
❑ NE
NV' ❑NA
[I NE
El NA
El NE
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: /" -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3 — ! Date of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents
t9. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes eNo NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, clieck the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
'ather
Rain Inspectio;�o
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ YesVNo:4
NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ YetTN
A
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ YeA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit'?
❑ YeA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ YeA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ YeA
❑ NE
Other lssues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or
12128104

Type of Visit compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit WRoutine 0 complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: a` S Departure Time: �7 County: wA�_ Region:
Farm Name: AC, FAAw-- iLk Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: &&PPR.Frva
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: i I Z s'
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = 1 = Longitude: 0 0 ❑ 1 =
� �'
Current Design Current , ^
: �uesJgstl
,di,�Design
o��n Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry S apa ty PoMDUI on
C+attlery Popullanon
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La et
'
❑
Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
"`
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultr�y�
``'
❑
D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El
Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
vwmo
tvvqAtP ❑ La ers
Z,,65- ❑ Non -Layers �`
❑ Pullets
❑
Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
El
Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ TurkeyPoults
Number of Structures:
❑ Other ❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
�NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
J0
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: Cf — Date of Inspection / i7
Waste Collection &'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ YesoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes oNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ;!fNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No
//To
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes,2�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) FE Cu
13.
Soil type(s) RC o L,C't` 3-Av+ VA jC C-
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 1PNo
❑ NA
1:1 NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name �:T�tr► Jeri.H Phone: �5 i�Z `f a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t i
12128104 Continued

s .
Facility Number: 3 — Date of Inspection t t -0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
5�►VS
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA P readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If es, check the appropri a box below.
1- qtj 7.' a 16"
El Waste Ap cation ❑ W ly Freeboard Waste Analysi b Soil Analysis
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YeszNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Ra' 11 ❑ �ing ❑ Crop Yield El120 Minu� Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ;eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes ZNo
24. Did the facility fail to A`Kratkltwaste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo
{
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? i�1b��6 -1 ❑ Yes ONo
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge`? ❑ Yes YNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 l . Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
?'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
9"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Conment`,s;'arid/o'rrDrarvin s ' �` ' A'
12128104

Type of Visit fd'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: l 7 Arrival Time: t f a S Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ICJOwner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: __ OAA2.-y-A t_G�� „..
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Region: Viez
Operator Certification Number: lr gC2 -
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = 6 = f4 Longitude: = e = 1
ff� I
Swine
I FIDign Current`-
Wet Poultry
Design';Current �� Desin Current
cit Po ula
Y P R
�u
Ca ac Po ulahon
1? �.�.,..RpF�
Cattle Ca acity Population.
...
❑ Wean to Finish
Ia
7
❑ La er
❑ Daipt Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La er
r ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
=�;
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder"
`
Non-DaiEX
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
Non -Layers
ElNN
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
El Turkeys
Qther
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑Other
Ell]
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
41
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the.State'
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No A NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[;�'VA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
Ef NA
❑ NE
5�NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes, ❑ No
..;' 1
El ❑ No
VN
I""" R'
❑-NE,
❑'Yes ❑ No
NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 2 =
Date of Inspection aS
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
(2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes gfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes FTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
maintenance or improvement? e
vi
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) F I_ S c:.. "'C -A A.
13. Soil type(s) �j $
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�ZNo
❑ NA
ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ElYes
[� No
El NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,
yes
/�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments {refer to question #) Explain any YES�answers�andlor,anyRecommendations or any other comments.
Use dre nffif facali `to better ex liilh situations use additional a des°as necessar
h'S i p� `p g w.I
ector Name •:]c tI1:' ,�"�ti' "' t Phone: S� i 4�'7"sa
Reviewer/Ins
P s ;s=
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S
12128104 Cnirtinued

y �
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records &_Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [�kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
� a3
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA [I NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improve'went? Ifyes,;heck the appropriate box bellow El Yes � No El NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ElWeekly Freeboard,.
❑ Was I, nalysis ❑ Soil Ahalylsis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Ann _ ofcation
❑ Ra fall ❑ Sto m ip yk' g El Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections El Monthly and 1"Rain Inspections ❑ W aher Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
rr-3
[INA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
7
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
�/] No
ElNA
El NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
/
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
A'dditaonalFCoinmentsand/nrDrawitgs
V
wf1` r '. �1,' s
k . 4 i+ ��
L_;
12128104

(Type of Visit OF Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: L o Time: Zo
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
;34'ermitted MCertifiied [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .............................................................................................................................. County:......W.A.(4.L:� .................................................
Owner Name:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: ............................................. ............................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: _ . A.P.'.;. T r' ( rc ............ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
❑ Swine ❑ poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • t 46 Longitude • 1 «
C� •fT
� Design Curren
•••,•.­ t:r:
ry uiauvu4t��„.:a�.w��.,ts,.�,i�u:,-vn
ac[[ °,rry uianvn:
❑ Wean to Feeder
e[s�
i!
❑ Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
Z,�O
,
❑ Non Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
eiE
❑ Other
El Farrow to Finish
3aa�
3 IE� fF13s� {E,i�..:
" 3 4 ' Total Desilj
s b a sil.Z
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream ImRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes C/No
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes No
❑ es o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Y No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
Identifier: .............................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 2
12112103
Continued

Facii!ity Nutr4ber: c -- 3 Date of Inspection Z a'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes �No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes j2�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ;RIKO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes]�N0
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes p "o
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Jr —_CS j
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ZI No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[ rNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�ZNO
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑/Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? /
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property) /
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name t a �" t"u1 i; f, i�"` i€i its filf aU `�9 : �r�" `/ !ai `Hiles / t,. ?L h � t !' N°=N " }:.�'�s .Wl
�P
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -7 2
12112103 Continued

l~adHty Ntimber: — Date of Inspection 7 -b
Required Records & Document.~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
ZNo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box be
❑ Yes
�(No
❑ Waste AppPAtion ElFreebp�d [I Wastenalysis ❑ Soil S ing
l
24. Is facility not in compliance with any appli b7e setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
o
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
YNo
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
discharge, freeboard
❑ Yes
(ie/ problems, over application)
'E�No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[�To
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ YesVNo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
P31No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 3I-35)
❑ Yes/No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Ye
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
r 1 120 Minute Insnections r'! Annual Certification Form
12112103

ayU
Type of Visit JOC`ompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit �:7 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
FFacility Number Date of Visit: O Time: t ��
.../ Not O erational Below Threshold
ermitted �ertified 0 Cond(ittiionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above reshold:
Farm Name: j C ff +" y P'�" ° S' ` �' County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
On site Representative:.,ci�l,aus'-1G[��
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ swine ❑ Poultry ❑Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
J Design
Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population
PouItr
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
El Wean to Feeder
z©
❑ La er
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
8 ; `
❑Non -La er
❑Non-Dai
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity..
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
w �.
Number of.Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Easpray Field Area t
-. _..
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1P No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes VNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑Ao
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 7/
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (lf yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [ INo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes /9 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes PNo
Waste I k •tin R& Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes .7No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 3
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: c3 — 3 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed,? ({ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type _ f`C_EC_0 . d-A y
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal W_ g,e� anagement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) l rr3��Z,f'z!! F
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrig�n, freelfoard, watt analysts &soil same a rep rts)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes W(No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes JNo
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes 7No
❑ Yes ,"No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
El 9�x
No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 4a 1VO
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ��fo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 4I No
❑ Yes 1No
,2
El Yes L� IN,"('
El Yes fff///j2No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. I
Reviewer/Inspector Name Ln
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Field Conv ❑ Final Notes
Date:
05103101 I Continued

Facility Number: 3 —3 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes PNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes P"No
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes E� No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? /P"Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:-.,
05103101

'7IN6 I�
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: �% to Time:
Not O erationall 0 Below Threshold
;l6rmitted Oertified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above
Threshold•
Farm Name: okL f a�S �`* P Ij -2-County: 61 A-"6"
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: I Title:
Onsite Representative: _�` °" E�J6�.L� Integrator:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude 0 & Lf Longitude • 4 Dµ
Swine
Current`',
Pnnnistinn'
❑ Wean to Feeder
9
❑ Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
7
fiber -4
Current -:. Design Current
Pnnr�latinn CHttle:� ... .,, f'nriarity Pnni`ilntinn�"'`
1LJ Non -Layer I 1 I, lIJ Non -Dairy I I I' '
3� --
k.°i ❑Other � "
,�a
Total Design Capacity ..
i
Total SSLW
:ILJ Subsurface Drains
❑ No Liquid Waste 11
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes L j.Pd'o
­�
❑ Yes �Io
❑ Yes ><10
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ZNo
Structure 6
Continued

r]
Facility Number: 93 — 341 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ZNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �NO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes �NO
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Z�No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes id No
12. Crop type ✓4_S v6"C_ N
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes EXNO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ZNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ;3"No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or oth r Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
7� zs� �j=
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Ce ified r►�i al Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes 6No
[C. LY 1
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri tion, fre�rd, waste analysis & soil sam�—plle reports) �� ❑ Yes �VNO
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ElYes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Y!rNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ONO
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ONO
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Ia No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes LQ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
U5/03/Ul c.onrrnuea

Facility Number: 9 -3— pi Date of Inspection 3 D Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below /Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes Wo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 5AP
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes /No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? dy
es ❑ No
Additional ornments 'an or ra n s:
ce
J
5/00

76
i.k.
It
Type of Vlslt 46 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Vielt Routine O Complaint O Fonow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of visit: PONot
c� Time:
Operational Q Below Threshold
PIrmitted E116ertifeed [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ...1 .... ...1 ......................................... County: ........... V, -A1i2 Fjt...........................
Owner Name:.......... .. Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:................................................................................
Onsite Representative: GW AP-r-rj ��c.:S
.............................................................
Certified Operator: ...........................
Location of Farm:
.......................................................................p.......................................
Integrator:....C-r �a ) aQ •qu—S-4 ................................................................
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� �«
Design,. Current Design Current Design Curren!
;Ca aci :Population Poultry Ca aci Po ulaflo" ; Cattle Ca ac>i Po 'elation ..;
❑ Wean to Feeder
a
❑ Feeder to Finish
V%ft
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ;.' ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other 14 , ,
Total'Desigin'Capacity` `
Total s—
i Number,of Lagoons i• ; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area - ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I SoIidETraps.' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes YNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes E!rNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ] Yes �' o
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes B'Nio
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;2No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 1110
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes
Structure 6
Identifier: ........................................
Freeboard (inches): Js
5/00 I
Continued on hack

Facility Number: — 3 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes )eNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ,QNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes PNo
_Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2N0
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ONo
12. Crop type r2, 3 C , F_ I.A wa.. Z'2. r
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes F`NO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ElYes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 210
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
PIR0
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
J2<0
Re uired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily availabl ?
❑ Yes
hTo
I8.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified � /mffVaalte Management Plan readily available?
lNNo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irn lion, reeXard, wasll alal§sis & soil sampld reports)
❑ Yes
0
/WNo
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0190
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
�(No
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0<o
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
i
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
Q YiQ1 iQ�s.a# ref��e ei ire � eS� �1 `t4 {�1s;v�s�t; Yoh will ireeeiyit 1) fP�h$t' . .
6 resaosidence: abvuti this .visitr ........... • . • ............ • ........ .
ReVlewer/InSpeCtOrName t
a1.4
¢3(�I���.'I„�::{� �lr, ¢ r:rii�o-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C._ Date:Z D a l 5/00

Facility Number: 9 — 3 i Date of Inspection 3b �
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below gYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes WRO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes WNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �'No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes J'No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes PNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑'�lo
Addidona omments an or,
.. .... .:.
5/00

�, / zz %--
Routine O Com laint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow -qp of DSWC review (:)Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection f= , E>a
t
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ermittedxdCertified © Conditionally Certified [3Registered E3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ......
Farm Name: .......... c...A `.. f' tax �Ep-� $i ......................... County: ......... ...W..la�
OwnerName:.Ql! ............... r�.�Z}....t' ............................................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .....................................................
Onsite Representative:......%�'}ta . f .. `p GZ!...................................................... Integrator:.. ...... ! ``...........................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
t.......................... ........ ............... ..................... .............................. 0......... ...............
�
Latitude 36 SZ Longitude
a Design Current
Design Current Design Current
e )E?oultry
-, 'aci °ulahon'- Cattle ° '{ 'aci `ulation
wane
.. Ca"acrty _rPo" ulat_ion
<`Ca Po , Ca , I?o
4. ❑ Wean tofeeder' �a [] Layer `` ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish[ ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other ,
Farrow to Finish
Total DeslgngCapaC><ty
Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLWt=
sNu
10 Subsurface Drains Present
..............
❑ Lagoon Area
10 Spray Field Area
-_.. ,-... •...... ... .... ... ... _.-. ,. ..--.
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
3
y „i� �i�Ci",�
1 , x
{3;
Holding Ponds / Salicl TraI1S
;o-
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system►? (Il` yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ZINO
❑ Yes ,JNo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes ��o
❑ Yes I�Ino
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .........................:..................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes P'Ko
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

+ Facility Number: 3 — 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes eNo
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes E No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes ;2(No
12. Crop type GuL>r N .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste na em nt Plan (CAWMP)?
��
❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
,ter'
❑ Yes 2 rro
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes 0 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ,( No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes O'No
Required Records & Documents
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes P`No
18. 'Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUF, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
nalysis
❑ Yes P.N0
rNNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri ion, frect%�ard, wast an & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
20_� Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design?
❑ Yeses] No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes A�No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
,j
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes 2No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ETNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
o yiolal�iQgs o dtf de am ,Wire ho ea• Ootiog 4Ms'vts1t; • Y:oo wilt•teeeiye 46 futftr'
/o
ctirresuorideike: aNaut this visit: ..........::.............::........ .
5) la 4Pti: RrDP.T�Sc1��hs�at_. 1A6
On fA-"G S AuG .14 _ Aif L- 1--v1
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,/�� 1_ { 4" Date:

Facility Number: Ij�F -- 3 Date of ILtspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below -Q-'�es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ZNO
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes -01No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 0 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes E,PK-01
.,�� GBJrG p7P PC
A

i .. ..
i 3 ,
� � � ' � '; . f'€i, 'Division of Soil and Water' Gonservahbn `O eration Review
I I •
1 .0 Division of Soil aiid Wat&r Conservation
,< ivision of Water Quality Compltance'Inspection ,;'
' a ' ',+ ru )s
a g Other Agency :- Uperahbil RevyeW
f .._�- -: ;r.; ,.
.a.l.iM:c
Routine Q Com laint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspecliou E=24
hr. (hh:mm)
XpermittedxCertified (] Conditionally Certified (] Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name WC, IZAe� P�t.�.. County:......' ?.p � R-E�
�. ........... .......................................................... ................................................................................................
Owner Name: ................................................... . Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ...........................................................,.,..,................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative:... 1. ,` ....F..�rfG.E..�f..r Integrator:........................................................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................. ... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
i
................................................. ................. ......................................I... ............. 1
Latitude ���° ��� Longitude �• �' �"
Design Current; Design. Current' Design Cur�e'nt
Swine.. Capacity Population Poultry -Capacity Po irlation Cattle Capacity Population!
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
�E!
+:
❑ Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
❑ Other
t i
4OAarss W
❑ Spray Field Area
Number of Lagoons,.,
❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110L.goon
Area
Holdtng'Ponds / Solid Traps
-"3
fE i . ` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischart*es & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes a
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (II ycs, notify DWQ)
�Ixo
El11N Yes O
%
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin`?
d. Docs discharge: bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, noti ry DWQ)
❑ Yes Ej No
`!�No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes -6No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes eNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .......... ...........................................................................................................................................................
...........
.............. I....................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes Io
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
Continued on back

acility Number: �]� �� % Date of Inspection t� �
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
ONO
(If any of questions 4-5 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑'*No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
Z.
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
JZ(No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
2<0
12, Crop type 42 £ S t-u.r_ F�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
ZNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
� o
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
El Yes
7No
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ZNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
JQ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
V�es
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
;3 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
ElYes
K
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑.Yes
o
///
Nb-yiolatidtis:or• dc#ic!e;ncies •were note�3• d(Wing phis:visit: • Y:ou ;wi-1.t- 'C. . Rio; #'u>i•... • . • :
6 res�oridence: abnrui this :visit: :::: :
�ii� i�' iE 11 -E
Commentsi(t efer tt►R,gnestton #} "EExplain any'YEES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments i j� E I
-
�,.:.,:;
`k' !
6,. .: .. i .t3s _', ?z ^". i.3 `..': ...E '.li>..>.;l E.E {� . �:.'� E1FrE -• is{' € , � 1 i¢ i
... dip f .. .—. s.¢:tr E i>i ;r i3! i } ,_.j ;ff.�E E �.3 Jill
[]se,drawin(" s of faciltt to better, explatrr;sEtuattons:l(use; add hpnal3.. a es as recessa : } t,i, ', t 4 �r !i; r !+ d,lt a. t s,
L"l..
E
!jjELF 77
.:' A E r t Li } ri sy!
3>-
19 p of ores Aa 'r 7S
t
P Y A rTr rt •vs P
Gac./.44vr
Reviewer/inspector Name 7i f, ;i u
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
0
Date: t o
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 5 t
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Q�Yes ElNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? /
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �NO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes IPINo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or /
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes /19No
3/23/99

ti Ivision of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of'Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
13 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
-.. 0 Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine O Com laint O FolloNi•-u) or I)1VQ ins ection O Other
Facility Number Date of InspectionVz6
I'inle of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ❑ Certified © Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not OperationalOperationall Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: ....................................................... Cuunty:...�� �h. ti
OwnerName: ................................................... .... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ........7.itle :............................. .. I'hune No:
Mailing; Addres,s:.............................................,..............................................
Onsite Representative:/....f.�"/S�lli...........l..L!:.E.................................. Intelrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:........................ .......
Location of Farm:
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
W-71—
Latitude 0 6 .1 Longitude 0 9 i0
Design
nwinc Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
23 Feeder to Finish /
Cl Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrnw.to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle ,,,Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Nan Laver IM Nun -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JCI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)'? ❑ Yes ?No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II' discharge is observed, w'as the conveyance uatn-oracle"' ❑ Yes /11 No
1). ]f dischan,c is observed. did it roach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. [f dischargc; is observed. wlwt is the estimated Ilow in tallutin?
d. Does discharge hypass a la,00n systcm? ❑ Yes VNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑Yes 0No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other- than from a discharge? ❑ Yes F�,Vo
Waste Collection & ri-entnient
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structur; 3 Sirw:ture 4 Structure 5 Siructure 6
Identifier:
Frcehoard (inches): ........... 7
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number Datc of Inspection
�5. Are there any immediate threats to.thc integrity of any 01'the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addt'csscd and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/imprnvelnenI?
1 1. Is there evidence of oover application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrog*cn
12. Crop type ........ '' II
1.3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (Footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
lleguired llecords & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector Fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a Follow-up visit by same agency?
13: M)'viola'dons:or. dehkie' nk es .wvere rioted. during .tl is.visit:. You will.re�ceive no further .: .
co3rresporideitce. ... .this visit.: .....:.......:.:.:. : .:... ; . ; ...... ....... ; ,.......:...:. ...:...:.
❑' cs PINo
❑ Yes ( No
V(Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑/I�I0
❑ Yes 0
................................
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
❑ Yes�No
El Yes; �No
❑ Yes ;�TNo
❑ Yes No
'i N 42CZ& +,4 ? &, t 7 LIGi�} W � 1 �c�QG� b �',�lr} ��/ v51/v
we VrIh(e- 411c;rc 5.�1`1
+t
i, titer ke�� v,✓� c { •� l46�r % . < r s ril C te,,�6 S
Reviewer/inspector Name
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ Yes ;�rNo
❑ Yes le,No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 7NO
o
❑ Yes
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �`��G�� / /6 1. �1 Date: " ! & 12 7 I 1 /6/99

KY Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSW C review O Other I
IFacility Number
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered 13 Certified 13 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
p
/
Farm Name:.......................................�..... ...........f ........... County: ...
................... .......................
OwnerName• ..,,l ..,C...... 1 ,�r!}....� .... L,�� .... r. r .._ ....... Phone No: ........................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:.,/ l �irj,,.V...... !%�(,r .�..,�. Integrator*. ...................:.
Certified Operator: ..................................................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number ;.....................
C
ME
Latitude =*=, =« Longitude =' =' "
ear s Design r. Carrent , Design �CUrrent " a�"illrrent
Swine `CupacityPopuYation�.Poultry Capacity Fopulation Cattle Capactyrl?nprylationf
Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy91
h ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-DairyMi
"�}. ❑ Farrow to Wean
M• _: .
25
❑Farrow to FeederE ❑Other{ i,*
❑Farrow to FinishDesignYCapac�ty
�T e° ;
❑ Gilts v k x € ,
❑ Soars r x `2�a', Tt}tal'SSL��;
Ntr oaf.a$oot;S! Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Presen!J10 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field rea
.......
❑ No Liquid Waste Management Lystem.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes F No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑"No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other /
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑d<io
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes, ((PNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ' I No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes . VNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ,No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ro
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97 Continueln back

' FaciUty Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lap-oonsZolding Ponds FAush Pits, etc,)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ,........�..�.r.......................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ...».....................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes [�No'
Structure 5 Struc /tore 6
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes )yNo
❑ Yes Pl�o
13. -Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes UTo
Waste Application 1
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
I5. Crop type',_ .Gv.�.............................................................................................................................................................................. ..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes #No
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
%o
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes PVNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted FacilitipQ Only /
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
No.violations:or de icieneies. were: noted -during this: visit.: You'4ill. receive•no-f&thei . ;
correspQdde 6,, fiWit this. VIA �. • : ; : .....::.:... ... ::... '
a 1 ] s tier Jot/m promo YYT 77frs V ,
7/25/97,.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
�.f..r� � ,rt _—'4tP'4�� ,.,_' �iri�.a�lxr��r^• - N.r �..

QrivIision
'ision of Soil and Water Conservation [3Other Agency
of Water Quality
Lqn outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DIVQ inspecti
Facility Number
Follow,up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 17j
Time of Inspection E� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0. Certified © Applied for Permit ©/Permitted [3 .Not Operational . Date Last Operated: ........... .........
Farm Name: .,,,, //� G • d.. �%r4/7/i� 2.�.5�i % ou Z-t7
ITV ............. r�..........L....:.................................�.......Z"'�".� C nty:.............................I—' .......................
Owner Name
,.........!....k. .... Phone No: ZS Z y... .......'�3..........................
Facility Contact: 51t!--.Z� ................... Title Phone No:
........ .....................................................................................................................
Mailing Address:...a.4....1............6..{. X ,10 f7i' li rvq ..:. ........�-—:......... �.7..'S -3................. ..........................
...............................................................I................. ,.- / rn
Onsite Representative: W rt�1 G n ... Integrator:.....(Y...'..1...................................................................
Certified Operator.......... ?..''. .�, L `` .. Operator Certification Number;....................
.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made? ❑ Yes No
Y
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) Cl Yes o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ YesZINX,
❑ Yes
❑Cl YesyNo
Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Continued on back

Facility \umber: �— j1,/
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes 10
Structures (LaLoons,HoldinL fonds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes N0
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Strucmre 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2
Freeboard(ft):......� .......................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any uthcr threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need m:iintcnancelimltia'ovement'? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maxintum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application � ~
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes �. o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type e.S
16..Do the -receiving crops differ with those designated in the....................................................................................'..........,.............. ..,...
p g Animal Waste Management Plan (AWrNIr)? ❑ Yes ;No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application) ❑zYes .1 1Vo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yet
19. ,Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ]+Ye's7�N
stir"
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑'Yes'
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
22. Does record keeping need improvement? f El Yes;N/
i'o
ForCertitied_orPermitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? - ❑ Yes
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
„l 25-,Wer yadditional`pr0bieiiis noted which cause noncoinpliarie'e'of the Perrrrit' *� s "1f❑'aYe; No ,
o.violations or deficiencies were noted during this:visit..Y,ou.will receive' further
correspondence alioitt this:visit:: .:
0):-'Explain'any.YES'ansm
ter:ezplain situations (use
f yN d
Reviewer/Inspector Name "CGS"' ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
rs and./or any recoi
any,urther-comments'.
z fi
i
J
n
7/25/97
Date:
fi.

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review '�"
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation ction perat Site Inspe
h av Fa . a
utine 0 Complaint laint 0 Follow-up of MV _) inspection 0 Foil ow- uof DSNVC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number LM
Time of'Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Tirne fin fraction ot'hours
Farm Status: [3 Registered (3 Applied for Permit (ex:.L25 for l hr I min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
FarmName:............................................................................................................................... County: ...... L-Ox.a.a/.{........................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.............................,.......,..........,......................................
Facility Contact: .......................................... ... Title:........,....... . Phone No:
MarlingAddress: ..........................,....n.,.............,................................................................................................................ ,.................. I.......................... ............ ,.............
Onsile Representative:... .tT./.L1.................E. E.. Al. .:.,............... Integrator:..,...................................................................................
I
Certified Operator:............................................................. ..... Operator Certification Number:....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • '_r--- 44 Longitude • 4 "
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/47
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes VNO
❑ Yes L�No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes �eNo
a ❑ Yes J v
❑ Yes �No
Continued on back

r
Facility Number.
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Molding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft); Structu I Structure Structure 3 Structure 4
.�............................................'............................................. ............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes r� No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 7 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
A r !
15. Crop type �..(�r. ,............................................................................................................................................. .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes E6 No
)ZYes
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes 116No
.......................................
❑ Yes 1 y1
0
❑ Yes 61NO
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
�No
❑ Yes
[jNo
❑ Yes 'No
❑ Yes ,E�No
Yes ❑ No
j2. psi �- tl uE.,--arn-ndIJ «.o ©N
Reviewer/Inspector Name
cis
.?-071
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
14"Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DNVO inspcvtion O Fnilow•up of DSWC.' 1•eviVW O Other _ I
Number Date of Inspection �3
Facility
Time of Inspection tS: 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered � ,,,,,,,__r/certified © Applied for Permit [3 Permitted © Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Nantes ..... '....Yi .)Cl!1... 1� r1...... 1[.th.P.... ... ,........ County: . ...........................................
Owner Name:.. .. � ,. ���`�'f U� , . Phone No-.C: J ,.�.. ................... „...................................................... ...
Facility Contact: .... IYA .:V..... ...... .................... Title:.....Y1!.....�................... Phone No:... .... .................
MailingAddress: ....'.,.....k.......Cx .............{'11..11Vu3......,....... 2...........:..................... ..........................
Onsite Representative...... !(': i ..... .. ........ Integrator: ...............................
..................................................................................
Certified Operator �' Op VIA.-?.V.k.......G-:-��!........................................ Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm: 5t.94, �2 Vt1t �Q ti\ ct
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 . E
Latitude Longitude �• �' �"
llestgn Current
w`,
Design Current Desgnurrelrtt
twine
Capacity Populafaon
�..
, Poultry
Capacity Popuhhan Cattle �apacrty)Prulatiox�,
Wean to Feeder
'� ©
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
ED Veeder to Finish
Q
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
rr
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
UFMOM Finish
d $ Tote Design Capacity
Gilts
R
{] Boars
Total.. LW'
�
'� �' �
u t
i�tutxtber`f Lagoons
/ Holding Ptritds 1 I `` ❑Subsurface Drams Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
.. r .
i
a
9 -
_—
❑ t Sy g No Liquid Waste Management . R YC
F
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
i. KO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
M-Ko
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
1
b. If dischame is observed, dill it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[Pro
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
.d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
'
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
_
O o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
1©<0
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
M o
maintenance/i mprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[ N�o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
Lt�'Ivo
7/25I97
Continued on back

1 k
Facility Number: Q3 — -"
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds Flush flits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft) .............................
.................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures`!
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 5`C ��'�..........................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.vialitioits-or deficiencies:were noted -during this;visit.-:Youdwill re'ceive•noStirther-:
: correspondence about this:visit::':
❑ Yes P<o
❑,Yes RIN-o
Structure 6
❑ Yes [9-I5ro—
❑ Yes Leo
❑ Yes GKO
❑ Yes M<O
❑ Yes 011'6
......................................
❑ Yes
5140�
❑ Yes
oa !�O
❑ Yes
l�o
❑ Yes
jD-Wo
❑ Yes
U-No
❑ Yes
®-10
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes 01'to
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Ctit timents Qwr d'.4iU 90 i #) ;;`1:xplatn any YES ans vers acid/nr ariy i�ecoYt ntenilattortx gr;uny other catn�niten s : ; M k
n" ,, w' ,, ,� -Yx r' s Y a �, 'ti
Use drAivf tgsgof facthty to better explain>sttttations, (use ( Ittona pages�as n&c Wtry)i M
'W P„5.-':S��A �' add x+''w",,I+'P x F
1
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
L�

�.TA
NCDEEIR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 14, 2009
North Carolina Farm Partnership
N C Farm Partnership 42
973 Kerr Lake Cole Bridge Rd.
Norlina, NC 27563
Subject: Additional Information Re-
quest ---Application No. AWS930034
N C Farm Partnership #2
Warren County
Dear North Carolina Farm Partnership:
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has
completed a preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is
required before we may continue our review. Please address the following items by September 25, 2009
Waste Utilization Plan:
The animal numbers in the Nutrient Management Plan (NMP) submitted with your permit
application renewal package do not match the animal numbers on you application, or your latest
Certificate of Coverage. Please submit two copies of your NMP that includes the 1200 Wean to
Feeder Swine combined with the 2300 Feeder to Finish swine.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/ additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my
attention at the Mail Service Center address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional
information on or before the above requested date may result in your application being returned as
incomplete.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may
result in a civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would
constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatergtiality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAihrmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
1Vg_ .tlne;thCarolina
UMAY
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax I : [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If you have any questions -regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
f
Larry W. Wade PE
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWS930034

r�
•
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
North Carolina Farm Partnership
NC Farm Partnership #2
Route 1, Box 105
Norlina NC 27563
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS930034
NC Farm Partnership #2
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Warren County
Dear North Carolina Farm Partnership:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to North
Carolina Farm Partnership, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS930034 which expires October 1,
2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the NC Farm Partnership #2, located in Warren County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 1200 Wean to Feeder, 2300 Feeder to Finish swine and the
application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If
this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15. sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
• Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] I Internet: h2o.en r. state. nc. us Natmally
An Equal OpporlunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycfed110% Post Consumer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization. Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office, The Regional Office Water .
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Paul Sherman at [phone].
Sincerely,
v ,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Warren County Health Department
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS930034
APS Central Files
•

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
6-
i
Producer: . MARTIN ENGEL
Location: RT. 1 BOX 105
NORLINA NC 27563
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing -Combination Swine Farm
Number of Animals: swine
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
1.0 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

hd
eh
.po 0
WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING PAN AND TONS OF WASTE
FROM COMBINATION SWINE OPERATIONS
Operation Code: 6 Combination Swine Farm
APPLICATION METHOD: I Irrigation
Type Operation Number Tons Waste PAN
Animals per Animal per an.
NUMBER
OF
WEAN TO
FEEDER PIGS: 1200
.40
.48
NUMBER
OF
FEEDER
TO
FINISH HOGS: 2300
1.9
2.3
NUMBER
OF
FARROW
TO
WEAN SOWS:
6.1
5.4
NUMBER
OF
FARROW
TO
FEEDER SOWS:
7.3
6.5
NUMBER
OF
FARROW
TO
FINISH SOWS:
19.9
26
TOTAL NUMBER ANIMALS: 3500
TONS OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO FEEDER 480 tons
FEEDER TO FINISH: 4370 tons
FARROW TO WEAN: 0 tons
FARROW TO FEEDER: 0 tons
FARROW TO FINISH: 0 tons
. TOTAL WASTE:. 4850 tons
PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO
FEEDER:
576 lbs
FEEDER
TO
FINISH:
5290 lbs
FARROW
TO
WEAN:
0 lbs
FARROW
TO
FEEDER:
0 lbs
FARROW
TO
FINISH:
0 lbs
TOTAL PAN: 5866
AVERAGE TONS OF WASTE PER ANIMAL PER YEAR:
AVERAGE PAN PRODUCED PER ANIMAL PER YEAR:
SLUDGE PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR: BROADCAST
WEAN TO
FEEDER:
91.2 lbs
FEEDER
TO
FINISH:
851 lbs
FARROW
TO
WEAN:
0 lbs
FARROW
TO
FEEDER:
0 lbs
FARROW
TO
FINISH:
0 lbs
TOTAL SLUDGE PAN: 942.2 lbs
AVERAGE SLUDGE PAN PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 0.2692
1.38571428571
1.676

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: MARTIN ENGEL
Location: RT 1 BOX 105
NORLINA NC 27563
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation.: Existing Combination Swine Farm
Number of Animals: 3500.00 swine
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
•tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
•
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
05. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, f t3, tons, etc.)
3500 swine x 1.38571428571 tons waste/swine/year = 4849.99999998 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
3500 swine x 1.676 lbs PAN/swine/year = 5866 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
452
23
36B
FHH
4.5
225
0
47.8
10755
I
MAR-
JUNE,AUG-N
END
I
TOTAL110755
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
E: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
• TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
FHH
FESCUE HAY - HAY
TONS
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 47.8 10755
• TABLE 2 0 0
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL 1 47.8 1 10755
*** BALANCE 1 -4889 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1`•
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Appl,ic. Amount
(inches)
452
23
36B
FHH
0.40
*0.75
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2_ Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
r
L.
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. when animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
• would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
• 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal'waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1.995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
• and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
•
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -- determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:NC FARM PARTNERSHIP ##2
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Faciq--
yOwner: MARTIN ENGEL
(Please print)
4*
w
Signature: 4,_ � Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (please print)Bruce Perkinson
Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257-
3836
Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St.
Warrenton NC 27589
q
Signature: t.L. r Date: 3 1
Page: 11

4048
_ yl. ,` � ..f 1��1}i11�"r�l ' �itll' (` 'il,t. ;i! `,c�=• Jil �• •l� 1, i,�l \. ;
.1
`:CKILIN'y�
RT f�{ 4 T
( `':11 } I lR\
32'30
,J i 1 1
I � ��' �� � I� i I� t' '• i I�•� � � �� �� 1 'i, 'J ' 7 r l) l�'i' � 1 (� _ �� { �� ( �`•���� ���� i� 11��� �� � { � l �� I �71,�� --'�) \��
jj },,
4047 li ', (('f' � l��`,
f. i ,\ y 1l 4
!i ('':r��1�1�• S�S1�}�-a,-' \`' �'`I-`\_ __.' r _���1 l�<� `l ,1lll,/9;-
s i .,�
0 000 FEET
(VA NN
5--�.71'
(ro Pin �Ir ,f• r� � \ v ' ,, - � 1]f i ��� �� ��. �,�� �` �� l �� ,�1�
4045
111�rf 1�111 - l I`� '}`( \ ,` 1(r `�f ✓ \ �\ / � II , r l (1
Cb
_.Rest'A[e l
4044 r �) ,� r � ! f ` \ . � , .', 4 I ', L � I, � 1 I �'• I I �,L -'' � .. ��",•-_ r7 -
1 �1 J1 5
_ '�� I � � \ r �\ sir°�%, � i l l -`` � } � I/. r ..• i I/,]) J(i l t `� ' , (f � t c
' F. !!d"N.'-INI� �' ��•1il }18�1 [.. 4� �. - 'r�"`�'V '1�`-�GY, ��� }�-., ��~'h4�
ji`
r � ��r� �1 .�..• .,- �i+', �, try,% } 1 ..-., ,,]r� ]�. '� !,1� _ t'��—`_
a043
tir30,
78° 15, 141 748 12080000 F1- FT (VA 11 y r fl rru,. r ,. r',nr 1 4,11 1.2r30n
�6, Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
Control by USGS and USC&GS Mn*
Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs 1 cN
taken 1967. Field checked 1968
Polyconic projection. 1927 North American datum 'h
9a MILS t'AI'
10,000-toot grids based on Virginia coordinate system, south zone, i��soMrfs
and North Carolina coordinate system �,!

-
1
' °1j pie•- ,c���l +M r'?'a;'r, r}�II' ' �,�� 7t 1_+ f� r' r , 1 �, r` i
1_"� j. v +.k, �;�•. ��� xllti IR
®rY r`trr:' rkY �r(1iv r :
1 +rti r t ti
�; •SFr /i � 1,�h, i.`�l,
�1 � ,u' rY• ��:r �,fr' ,° �j,un � -9ir ��.{� I -7 �-e I J r t
Pf
41
. • �A ,q l , r t r' n
7A
".4"4t, L
•i
NIS,
ie
Sr yy•- A• rr�,:� � -.� \r-rr ?11 •tug' uA .}i. �.' '
4
r
f/­41
Y 1�Iw
_'`r
Alm
� �. vy „241;«i r w!1�,'t;;•i,�;.•r'.::fi -,a;;r' ��
tiir- l' .�'•''" , ,'I LrJ1}',{,�,s..'�+..fit }.., •C ,.r

11
NAY = 7 20M 1141 t
cl� Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste � Uri
UtIiori =i�lf,�C
04-29-2003
This plan has been prepared for: I This plan has been developed by:
North Carolina Farm #2
Martin Engel
Rt. 1 Box 105
Norlina, NC 27563
(252)-456-2437
Larry West
Warren SWCD
RR 1 Box 486 D
Warrenton, NC 27589
[phone]
Developer Si
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
A,— Lj
S--1 -Zod�
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved`
Technical
s-/-6-3
Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
Ul
North Carolina Farm #2 waste generated 2,361,295 gals/year by a 2,300
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility
has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5439
Incorporated
9340
Injected
10286
Irrigated
5911
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
10,006.22
3,996,894
-1,635,599
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
-----------
Note: Insou-- rce --ID-,-S--means -------standa---rd-sour---ce-,-U--me---ans---user------deimed s--ource.--------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This swine operation is a combination of 1200 wean-feeder/2300 feeder -finish. The waste generated by
this operation will be irrigated on existining fescue hayland by an underground hydrant system and/or
temporary pipe laid on top of ground.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summar
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (U)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
452
15A
3.50
3.50
N/A
Vance
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
452
16
3.90
3.90
N/A
Vance
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
452
23A
57.20
43.67
N/A
JVance
lFescue Hay
4.4 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 64.6o 51.07
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< —10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the
soluble nutrient leaching below the
soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrientuse efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
---------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 PCS Page i of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plates may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year
Tract
Field
Source
t.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
IWA
1000
gal/A
I tons
1000 gals
tons
452
15A
U1
Vance
3.50
3,50
Fescue Hay
4.4Tom
811-7/31
195
0
0
Irrig.
195
7T89
0
272.62
0.00
452
16
U l
Vance
3,90
3.90
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
61
0
0
Irrig.
196
78.29
0
305,33
0.00
452
23A
Ul
Vance
57.20
43,67
Fescue Hay
4.4Tons
8/t-7/31 f
*196
0
0
Irrig.
196
78.29
0
3,418.94
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3.996.89
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,361,30
Balance, 1000 gallons
1,635.60
Total Applied, tons
" ` `'
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
-
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol —means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
--- -- -------------------------------- ----------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29/03 WUT Page 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not resul t in runoff. This table provides the maximum, application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irritation ADDlication Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
452
15A
Vance
0.35
1.00
452
16
Vance
0.35
1.00
452
23A
Vance
0.35
1 1.00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 IAF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumuiation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant avail able nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac 1
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
28.83
57.67
86.50
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
14.42
28.83
43.25
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
27.03
54.06
81.09
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I North Carolina Farm #2
Design Storage Ca acit (Days)
Start Date
9/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
b
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
I
9
180
I
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
---------------------------------------...___-___------__-----,
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29/03 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29/03 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29/03 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 15A, 16, 23A
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lblac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance time, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb1ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 CropNote Page 1 of l

N
/ C
°N
NR:R CQ �J5h4 I ,CAL
u
41
Il
�II II �1
I;
III 411 Y, �
5l
50
.:t--
a � � •II
/ice O
use
LV
Y1,
COP-OEOIp ICAL SVRVE RES pN, yIAOINIA� p♦1�1 I 741 J 12080000 FEET {VA.} -�49 HENDERSON r5
� h;t k• WI, fr]�'4fs�j✓`d' �,,� race
ROAD CLASSIFICATION �c•� ate/ Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
Light -duty road, hard or , Control by USGS and USC&GS
MN
Improved surface......... -Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs 1 cH
r. taken 1967, Field checked 1968 }y 1
Unimproved road .....a=-===-==P ,., e �, 10'�17,,,, *k A....,.,..__ I_..._ 51,• I f

Y-7T�
Ob

CAWMP We Lable Acre ,A/C �A/e aJ . Traveling Gun Field Dau sheet, 2720199
21
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA SHEET
I.
Make and model number i.g�.r a n 3 Mo- ![ L 3ZSo Lt%,d � c 4 �,�`,�-
_
2.
1 25o 97S
Hose length [feet] and hose inside diameter (16t
7S� 3. Z5,
[inch]
3.
Gun make and model number Melfc"q /5D
4.
Gun nozzle size / [inch], ring orifice,
✓ taper bore orifice.
5.
Gun arc angle �_ [degrees]
6.
Travel lane spacing 50 j4,1,1. [feet]. Indicate whether
uniform, random.
Number of exterior hydrants Number of interior
hydrants
7.
Gun wetted diameter 3 ,4-5_ [feet], measured,
based on gun chart.
8.
Gun pressure ! (e 0 [psi]. -:?7s `Ail
observed at working gauge,
✓ determined from gun charts,
calculated (show calculations)
**9.
Operating pressure at hose reel [psi].
observed at working gauge,
provided by owner.
* * 10.
Supply line size (,a [inch] (from pump to last hydrant).
* * 11.
Supply line length feet (maximum pumping distance).
* * 12.
Supply line type PVC, aluminum.
* * 13.
Pump make and model number
ems,__ --
**14.
Pump capacity, [gpm].
* * 15.
Engine make and model number
or
** 16.
Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp]
[rpm]
Note; It is strongly recommended that operating pressure at the reel and gun wetted
diameter be field determined. -
Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres will be determined by travel lane
*" Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information furnished by
and/or_
Signature of Owner or Fac ty Representative Signature of Technical Specialist
-A?nt / n EA /e
Printed Name of 0,vmer or Facility Representative
Date �S - I - Z.© o"41
a.1�L-- e5z1�.S- -
Printed name of Technical Specialist
Date Z --2 6 - 0 Z.
1�
*** Only the person or.persons collecting the data should sign the data sheet.

L./74-f OPI

CAWMP Wettable Acra
Traveling Gun Camputa ional Woriahcr 2-20-99
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) Y,C . rm_-' Z Field Number (Identification)
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes [feet] Length of pull(Li)
Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _Meet] Length of pull(L2)
n Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted Diameter 3q5 [feet] From field data sheet
y
5. Spacing 2.5-o" Hydrant Spacing [feet] -7Z [as percent of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
AR
•
a '
;I •
0 Me MUM I
I
I
,
S♦ I /
♦ 1
v.
I

EXH BTF D-2
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Model
Field N-1
and
Hydrant N.2
i
Application
Rate
(in/hr)
TRAVELLANE
Effective Effective
Width (ft) Length (P)_:
•
(feet)
EQLfIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
(in - 6e-) @ Gun (psi) @ Reel (psi) Patte.3
I See attached map.
2Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
3Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
NRCS, NC
.TUNE, I996

t
Table E90+. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems
Field with Single Pull or Multiple pulls and'
Hydrant Spacing Greater than 90 percent of ytdfic ,wetted diameter,
(Areas shown are acreage outside starting/stopping gun location)
wetted start end Stop end wetted area, acres
diameter wetted
d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle
(feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees
(A) A (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
150
0.16
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.14
160
0.19
0.00
0.05
0.09
0.14
0.16
170
0.21
0.00
0.05
0.11
0.16
0.18
180
0.24
0.00
0.06
0.12
0.18
0.20
190
0.26
0.00
0.07
0.13
0.20
0.22
200
0.29
0.00.
0.07
0.15
0.22
0.24
210
0.32
0.00
0.08
0.16
0.24
0.27
220
0.35
0.00
0.09
0.18
0.27
0.29
230
0.39
0.00
0.10
0.19
0.29
0.32
240
0.42
0.00
0.11
0.21
0.32
0.35
250
0.46
0.00
0.11
0.23
0.34
0.3B
260
0.49
0.00
0.12
0.25
0.37
0.41
270
0.53
0.00
0.13
0.27
0.40
0.44
280
0.57
0.00
0.14
0.29
0.43
0.48
290
0.61
0.00
0.15
0.31
0.46
0.51
300
0.66
0.00
0.16
0.33
0.49
0.55
310
.0.70
0.00
0.18
0.35
0.53
0.58
320
0.75
0.00
0.19
0.37
0.56
0.62
330
0.80
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.66
�--� 340
0.84
0.00
0.21
0.42
0.63
0.70
350
0.89
0.00
0.22
0.45
0.67
0.75
360
0.95
0.00
0.24
0.47
0.71
0.79
370
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.83
380
1.05
0.00
0.26
0.53
0.79
0.88
390
1.11
0.00
0.28
0.56
0.83
0.93
400
1.17
0.00
0.29
0.58
0.88
0.97
410
1.23
0.00
0.31
0.61
0.92
1.02
420
1.29
0.00
0.32
0.64
0.97
1.07
430
1.35
0.00
0.34
0.68
1.01
1.13
440
1.41
0.00
0.35
0.71
1.06
1.18
450
1.48
0.00
0.37
0.74
1.11
1.23
460
1.55
0.00
0.39
0.77
1.16
1.29
470
1.61
0.00
0.40
0.81
1.21
1.34
480
1.68
0.00
0.42
0.84
1.26
1.40
490
1.75
0.00
0.44
0.88
1.32
1.46
500
1.83
0.00
0.46
0.91
1.37
1.52
CAWMP Wettable Acre
Traveling Gun System Page 29 EBAE-99, 2/20199

p
Table EE70. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems
Exterior lane - in field with multiple overlapping lanes:
Hydrant Spacing based on 70 percent of mif d .wetted diameter,
(Areas shown are acreage outside starting/stopping gun location)
wetted start end Stop end wetted area, acres
diameter wetted
d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle are angle
(feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
150
0.18
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.13
0.15
160
0.21
0.00
0.04
0.09
0.15
0.17
170
0.24
0.00
0.05
0.11
0.17
0.19
180
0.26
0.00
0.06
0.12
0.19
0.22
190
0.29
0.00
0.06
0.13
0.21
0.24
200
0.33
0.00
0.07
0.15
0.24
0.27
210
0.36
0.00
0.08
0.16
0.26
0.29
220
0.40
0.00
0.08
0.18
0.29
0.32
230
0.43
0.00
0.09
0.19
0.31
0.35
240
0.47
0.00
0.10
0.21
0.34
0.38
250
0.51
0.00
0.11
0.23
0.37
0.42
260
0.55
0.00
0.12
0.25
0.40
0.45
270
0.60
0.00
0.12
0.27
0.43
0.49
280
0.64
0.00
0.13
0.29
0.46
0.52
.290
0.69
0.00
0.14
0.31
0.50
0.56
300
0.74
0.00
0.15
0.33
0.53
0.60
310
0.78
0.00
0.16
0.35
0.57
0.64
320
0.84
0.00
0.18
0.37
0.61
0.68
330
0.89
0.00
0.19
0.40
0.64
0.73
--->-340
0.94
0.00
0.20
0.42
0.68
0.77
350
1.00
0.00
0.21
0.45
0.72
0,82
360
1.06
0.00
0.22
0.47
0.77
0.86
370
1.12
0.00
0.23
..0.50
0.81
0.91
380
1.18
0.00
0.25
0.53
0.85
0.96
390
1.24
0.00
0.26
0.56
0.90
1.01
400
1.31
0.00
0.27
0.59
0.95
1.07
410
1.37
0.00
0.29
0.62
0.99
1.12
420
1.44
0.00
0.30
0.65
1.04
1.18
430
1.51
0.00
0.32
0.68
1.09
1.23
440
1.58
0.00
0.33
0.71
1.14
1.29
450
1.65
0.00
0.35
0.74
1.20
1.35
460
1.73
0.00
0.36
0.77
1.25
1.41
470
1.80
0.00
0.38
0.81
1.31
1.47
480
1.88
0.00
0.39
0.84
1.36
1.54
490
1.96
0.00
0.41
0.88
1.42
1.60
500
2.04
0.00
0.43
0.91
1.48
1.67
CAWMP Wettable Acre
Traveling Gun System Page 17 EBAE-217-99, 2J20I99

Table EI70_ Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems
Interior lane - in field with multiple overlapping lanes:
Hydrant Spacing based on 70 percent of ud led wetted diameter,
(Areas shown are acreage outside starting/stopping gun location)
wetted start end Stop end wetted area, acres
diameter wetted
d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle
(feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330.degrees
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
150
0.16
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.11
0.13
160
0.19
0.00
0.03
0.07
0.13
0.15
170
0.21
0.00
0.03
0.08
0.15
0.17
180
0.24
0.00
0.04
0.09
0.16
0.19
190
0.26
0.00
0.04
0.10
0.18
0.21
200
0.29
0.00
0.05
0.11
0.20
0.23
210
0.32
0.00
0.05
0.12
0.22
0.26
220
0.35
0.00
0.06
0.14
0.25
0.28
230
0.39
0.00
0.06
0.15
0.27
0.31
240
0,42
0.00
0.07
_ 0.16 _
_ 0.29
0.34
250
0.46�
0.00
0.07
0.18
0.32
0.36
260
0.49
0.00
0.08
0.19
0.34
0.39
270
0.53
0.00
0.08
0.20
0.37
0.42
280
0.57
0.00
0.09
0.22
0.40
0.46
290
0.62
0.00
0.10
0.24
0.43
0.49
300
0.66
0.00
0.10
0.25
0.46
0.52
310
0.70
0.00
0.11
0.27
0.49
0.56
320
0.76
0.00
0.12
0.29
0.52
0.60
330
0.80
0.00
0.13
0.31
0.55
0.63
340
0.85
0.00
0.13
0.32
0.59
0.67
350
0.90
0.00
0.14
0.34
0.62
0.71
360
0.95
0.00
0.15
0.36
0.66
0.75
370
1.00
0.00
0.16
_ 0.38
0.69
0.80
380
1.06
0.00
0.17
0.41
0.73
0.84
390
1.11
0.00
0.18
0.43
0.77
0.88
400
1.17
0.00
0.19
0.45
0.81
0.93
410
1.23
0.00
0.20
0.47
0.85
0.98
420
1.29
0.00
0.21
0.50
0.89
1.03
430
1.35
0.00
0.22
0.52
0.94
1.08
440
1.42
0.00
0.23
0.54
0.98
1.13
450
1.48
0.00
0.24
0.57
1.03
1.18
460
1.55
0.00
0.25
0.59
1.07
1.23
470
1.62
0.00
0.26
0.62
1.12
1.28
480
1.69
0.00
0.27
0.65
1.17
1.34
490
1.76
0.00
0.28
0.68
1.22
1.40
500
1.83
0.00
0.29
0.70
1.27
1.45
CAWMP Wettable Acre
Traveling Gun System Page 24 EBAE-217-99, 2/20199

Om
75 - 3 4s �' �� ��s^ /7Z-
-31th��b•� X 17zS 33e
7F7--
Of
,
?s
�I
Ali

a1,Js gs oe>3 4
0
•
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization' .
This plan has been prepared for:
North Carolina Farm #2
Martin Engel
Rt. I Box 105
Norlina, NC 27563
(252)-456-2437
This plan has been developed by:
Larry West
Warren SWCD
RR I Box 486 D
Warrenton, NC 27589
[phone]
Developer S
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
9 A,— Ej
s--I -?- oo:
Signature (owner) rQ Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Cominission.
Plan A
Technical Spechdist
s` ' �3
Date
i-------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
-
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
Agirifer protection Sectjorl
APR 0 2 2009

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
. Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U1
North Carolina Farm #2 waste generated 2,361,295 gals/year by a 2,300
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility
has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5439
Incorporated
9340
Injected
10286
Irrigated
5911
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
10,006.22
3,996,894
-1,635,599
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
•
•--___---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

. Narrative
This swine operation is a combination of 1200 wean-feederl2300 feeder -finish. The waste generated by
this operation will be irrigated on existining fescue hayland by an underground hydrant system and/or
temporary pipe laid on top of ground.
•
0 - - - 355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (U)
Soil Series
Crop S22uence
RYE
452
15A
3.50
3.50
N/A
Vance
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
452
36
3.90
3.90
NIA
Vance
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
452
23AI
57.20
43.67
NIA
Vance jFescuc
Hay
1 4.4 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 64.60 51.07
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> _ 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< = 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the
soluble nutrient leaching below the
soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
•
-------------------------------------------------------___-_-----------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 PCS Page e I of I
WOTE: Svmbol * means user entered data.

0 0 0
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
[Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs1A)
1 Applic-
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
452
15A
U 1
Vance
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
8/1-7131
195
0
0
Irrig.
195
77.89
0
272.62
0.00
452
16
U1
Vance
3.90
3,90
Fescue Hay
4.4Tons
811-7/31
*196
0
0
Irrig.
196
78.29
0
305.33
0.00
452
23A
U1
Vance
57,20
43.67
Fescue Hay
4.4Tons
811-7/31
*196
0
0
brig. 1
196
78.29
0
3,418.94
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,496.89
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,361.30�
=:
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,635.60'
Total Applied, tons
r= ' ='=`
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
`"' `_ ' Y ::
O.OD
Balance, tons
- "-
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol - means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
-------- -----------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29103 M UT Page 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not resul t in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
452
15A
Vance
0.35
1.00
452
16
Vance
0.35
1.00
452
1 23A
Vance
0,351
1.00
•
0 --- 355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 IAF Pa e t of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. if this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
28.83
57.67
86.50
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
14.42
28.83
43.25
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
27.03
54.06
81.09
W-355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Sludge Page-
1-of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
. capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
•
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacity
Source Name
INorth Carolina Farm #2
Design Stora a Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/01
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days) "
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
b
180
1
7
149
1
8
118
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
0 --- 355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
------------------------

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
. rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fail or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
• the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
is 355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29/03 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
• or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
0 --- 355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29103 Specification Pale 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
. at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------
355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/29/03 Specification Page 4

0
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 15A, 16, 23A
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
is 355044 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-29-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 1

z ,.
1-7
II
714
ABM
LE RG_
♦y� =ter
•Chzt,e� ,.
P as rtt Grov _
��57 ti
Nj
b 4 �
�� � J n � % � �.� ._,mil � �� � v � .• j— - ,_ � _
I
0 11 �o '•ti7> O \ \ � 1
�\
}! o
_A,
CYO
.0 1
Ce
v j 1210 II c'85
.
749
HE"DERSON 75
OLOGIOAL �IJRVEi,RES�iN, VIRGIN IA pBl w 147 12 OSO 000 FEET (VA.)
%k1% R• IBC r�46° r+ti 79` 15 YBCC y Qci d
ROAD CLASSIFICATION Chu .3 Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
Light -duty road, hard or Control by USGS and USC&GS MN*
improved surface_..... Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs
y, taken 1967. Field checked 1968 ` f
--- -- - I Inimnrnmorl rnnrl -------
- _ - .. .,.,.-. .. - >nu• 1 i

,ph'

n
•
•
CA%k'MP WaL-jhic Acre I/L �jrR Al. f ? 0 Traveling Gun Field Dale shcc, 2.'24199
/Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA SHEET
I. Make and model number
So L. e 32-S0 G' d 01
� c `'�•'��
ys
2. Hose length1250 9 [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID)_[Inch]
[inch]
3. Gun make and model number lellar� /50
4.
Gun nozzle size [inch], ring orifice,
✓ taper bore orifice.
5.
Gun arc angle p [degrees]
6.
Travel lane spacing 5D - . [feet]. Indicate whether
uniform, random.
Number of exterior hydrants Number of interior hydrants
7.
Gun wetted diameter 3.45 [feet]. measured,
based on gun chart.
8.
Gun pressure D[psi]. �7s ICAW
observed at working gauge,
✓ determined from gun charts,
calculated (show calculations)
**9.
Operating pressure at hose reel [psi],
observed at working gauge,
provided by owner.
* * 10.
Supply line size [inch] (from pump to last hydrant).
* * 11.
Supply line length feet (maximum pumping distance).
* * 12.
Supply line type f PVC, aluminum.
* * 13.
Pump make and model number
e.,,/
**14.
Pump capacity, [gpm]. _
* * 15.
Engine make and model number •-
or
* * 16.
Electric motor horsepower and rpm [hp]
[rpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended that operating pressure at the reel and gun wetted
diameter be field determined. -
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irritrated acres will be determined by travel lane
*" Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information fumished by
and/or
Signature of Owner or Fac Xty Representative Signature of Technical Specialist
cn g I,,�
Printed Name of gamer or Facility Representative
Dates„ - I - Z,O On
ra •I k-- e5jy s
Printed name of Technical Specialist
Date -. - 2- 6 - 0 2—
*** Only the person or persons collecting the data should sign the data sheet.

A----
- -----

0
•
CAWMP Wettable Acre
Traveling Gun Ccrnpuwional Workshcr, 2-20-99
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) C rm 2 Field Number (Identification)
2. Irrigation System Designation Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes [feet) Length of pull(LI)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes Meet] Length of puU(L2)
n Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3 )
4. Wetted Diameter 3q5 [feet] From field data sheet
S. Spacing 2.So` Hydrant Spacing [feet] '7Z [as percent of wetted diameter]
b. Hydrant Layout -_,KMultiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
�c�draY\4-I
CX71.-ivT.
-
5+z?,+ End
M,dd/e Poi --/-/an
-s4f 5rd
-
lQI-.s,
0,
R(oo x 2 8b - 6 .1
-7
O Z
E-7a
S x -
.
/ 0 3
CC-7o
0 - .8
•7 `7
/o
-E- a
x z µ
/o S
E 7 0
9 �f
�a JC Z8a = 9
4 • -7
. b0
D
c -�0
beo x Zoo - -3`7
D -7-
.oe$
07
F
Z 060 x 20= Z
0,70
3,
�cld 5A
O's
lot
E

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 9, 1999
North Carolina Farm Partnership
NC Farm Partnership #2
Rt 1 Box 105
Norlina NC 27563
Attn: Martin Engel
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS930034
NC Farm Partnership #2
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Warren County
Dear Martin Engel:
T. -_ Gap _.
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to North Carolina Farm Partnership, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the NC Farm Partnership #2, located in Warren
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 1200 Wean to Feeder and 2300 Feeder to Finish and
the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
:n
The COCshall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC. will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's.expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] . FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS930034
NC Farm Partnership #2
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Warren County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
dui APR � f
4 [999 1
RC`G101d,gC OFFICE!

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
North Carolina Farm Partnership
NC Farm Partnership #2
Route 1, Box 105
Norlina NC 27563
Dear North Carolina Farm Partnership:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND•NATURAL RESOURCES
i
December 30, 1999 1
f
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number93-34-:�
Warren County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should. be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or pernvtting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
North Carolina Farm Partnership
NC Farm Partnership #2
RtIBox 105
Norlina NC 27563
Dear Farm Owner:
� E N R
1. 3tl-fV
Subject: Classification of Animal Waste Management Systems
Facility: NC Farm Partnership #2
Facility ID #: 93-34
County: Warren
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue. Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge (OIC) by January 1, 1997, for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more
horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management
system. Our records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets
the requirements for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is available for animal waste management system operators. For
information on the training programs please contact your local Cooperative Extension Agent. Operator
certifications are issued by the Water Pollution Control Systems Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). For information on the certification process, please contact the Technical Assistance and
_...Certification Unit at [phone]. The type of -training and certification required for the operator of each .
system.is.based on the nature of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat
the animal waste. There are two types of animal waste management systems, type A and type B. Type A
animal waste management systems are generally used to treat waste generated by monogastric animals
which produce a low -fiber waste. Type B animal waste management systems are generally used to treat
waste generated by ruminants and other animals which produce a high -fiber waste. The type of training and
certification an operator receives should correspond with the type of system(s) they intend to operate. For
more information on the classification of your system please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not
intend to operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or
engage a contract operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge,
whether yourself or another person, must possess a currently valid certificate of the appropriate type.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cd/AW OIC Designation
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 22, 1999
North Carolina Farm Partnership
NC Farm Partnership #2
Rt 1 Box 105
Norlina NC 27563
Attn: Martin Engel
1 IT "lk_
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
7 R ? 3 lgmg
Subject: Application No. AWS930034
Additional Information Request
NC Farm Partnership #2
Animal Waste Operation
Warren County
Dear Martin Engel:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review, Please address the following by March 24, 1999:
Please provide the date the facility originally began operation.
2. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the Yield for Fescue Hay on Tract 452, field 23 as 4.8 tons per
acre. This is higher than currently recommended. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the
Waste Utilization Plan or provide justi rication that supports the increased yield as shown in the current
WUP. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below, The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before March 24, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely, %j
Susa" n CauIe��rl/
Y
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:1.Ral6igh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

SrA
�t
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Division of Soil and Water Conservation Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
September 12, 1997
Martin Engel
Rt 1 Box 105
Norlina, NC 27563
I
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summaries and Corrective Action endations
Spring Valley Farms Facility Nos. 93-6 an 93-34
fic Farm Partnership Facility No. 93-1
Warren County
Dear Mr. Engel,
On September 9, Operation Reviews were conducted of the Spring Valley Farms, facility nos. 93-6 and 93-34,
and INC Farm Partnership, facility no. 93-1. These Reviews, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, are one
of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water
Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State,' and the
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly-- maintained and operated under the
responsible charge of a certified operator. The following observances were discovered and noted for corrective action or
response:
1. Vegetation needs to be established on all bare areas on the lagoons and on the rainwater diversion
pathway. The vegetation should prevent erosion from occurring in the future.
2. The Waste Utilization Plans(WUPs) need to be adjusted to show proper nitrogen loading levels for both your
soybeans and Fescue crops. Please contact your technical specialist, Bruce Perkinson, to remedy this situation.
After the WUP crop nitrogen loading rates are changed, you will need to do the nitrogen balance sheets for your
records.
3. The 3 seeps discovered by the back base of the primary lagoon at facility no. 93-1 have been reported to both
the Division of Water Quality and the Warren District office. When I spoke with Bruce Perkinson of the Warren
office, he stated that your farm manager had been in to discuss the problem with him and that an appointment
with an engineer from PIC was set for September 11. 1 would like to commend you for the rapid response to the
potential threat that the seeps present. Water Quality personal plan to take samples to determine if the seeps
are from the lagoon or another source.
4. Facility no. 93-34 has no designated operator in charge of the waste system. I have enclosed the form to be
fill out and sent to the Division of Water Quality to correct this oversight.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review. Please
do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
MOar gar rKeefe, Environmental Engineer I
cc: Warren Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 " Raleigh. NC 27609
Voice (919)5714700 • FAN (919)5714718
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
30%recycled/ 10"10 post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina RECElVEQ
OT
Department of Environment and Natural ResourgmERQUPbNSr-
' Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form ��B t t��9
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) P®omitting
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste OpoadlibM
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best its possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: NC Farm Partnership #2
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: North Carolina Farm Partnersh
1.3 Mailing address: Rt I Box 105
City, State: Norlina NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-456-2437
Zip: 27563
1.4 County where facility is located: Warren
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR 1311, hlwy I Fast 0.5 miles on 1311.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Martin Engel
1.7 Lessee's I Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation:
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _93_ (county number); 34 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
3500- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? [Oyes; =no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Layer
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 93 - 34
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and are •not covered by the application
5��
system): ;Required Acreage (as listed ira the AWMP): -� �� LO (4
2.4 Nttmbero lagoons storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 1
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
ES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? T —
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations. E
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 93 - 34

Facility Number: 93 - 34
Facility Name: NC Farm Partnership #2
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
RECEIVED
PMER QUALITYSFC-noN
FFB ' I r 1999
N017-Mcha yy''
(Land Owner's name listed in q estiorMn l "��, attest that
this application for G - (Facility name listed in question 1.1)'
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the Kst of n y knowledge. i understand that if all required parts of this
application are not c mpleted and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be ret rn d to me ps inconfMft. !i
Signature
Date �_ q
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (coinpletc only if dif'fcrent liom the Land Owner)
Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application liar G}-zs r_m �s;tt ,�#�_ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and comp ete to the e best of my knowledge. lendersTand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting inforinalion and attachments are not included, this application
package will be re irned as incotrfri to A
Signature
Date ;--3 — Q 9
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 93 - 34

i 1
1 n MEC Kl ! rlRURG � �
F. C O� U H T Y � r,
a3
- m C
't 1741 ;+ l1�S U .. _..a.., .. 174E -
Imi ? Gee! Sm1th .�
u
u 120 1144 t7-l! :� b lt9i l741
fall lag '� x nsa Ir]s
1 £lU L4! y "°° lahl LtJ t �ti 1142
rr ^errs amw Ali
1214
2.] Li _
_lu12-
y it
1210
CD 1DA
DuDu�h y
r14 ?
y�
•s ' _ 1x t llal t ,r14 a R—ro�" __4
S iroo �* 1210 h ter #S xr f 3 Q 1 134P p s 3i
� •tali � l7a! Ina M1 _
I7
2
.0 1 a. Ixe0
_. _ +3>f __... _ _ _ Jlt__ � . 1i43. _ _ , __ _
Ifxs 11\aa1 � -7 ; Wamn r� 1tQa r �Jlr
S IfN ill S r:.. "{
litL 11u Irt4 y 7 `-+ , !7� .: f fall
..; 1t:1 laal 1]]Z 7 �s+' '+' "'
LW ? v r 1�
UV
l7 G. Lil FIJ avr. a Lffi 'b 1MCOH ® _
y faa! t A .3 —Y W►a 901 Cfo t r !sa' 134i� Isa n 1 pr. 153
17x
314! s t.e
as l Hoaolla lln a v ra 7 1
76'93' 1 :A
lilt R 1.1 :t: �y �,j 1325
I_.I. t� ` p. Wafh
m
luz la y
/ I 11411.1 SmA .7 13a �a ]t41
Ise I CRY lLL7. � t 1 1' t 1 - .:. "a L9�
s a Its F'fshlro ,y-l_ll'_ ^: • >� tfy WARRENTON x1
* FOF. 905 .7
1 7 Itis
'':ti2:i t '�J 1441 1144 <v
b lit a7 36
1!J! 1JJ1'WF ,1,F �2 UN b
Embro
�4 11�. rilj ;• � :�
in'1' 1441 L9L
v
F •ills A01 .4 :0 397 r.d
r ltsE
lekrr� yf } (3?
n I.a AtFren. �. l.] 17
1441 INA
Fbs ll44. P bFs 1121
Bred& y .e
y I O
1.e ; �4L
C24
11i ' 1d ,64s 1 1e
1_ e]
a11i L1t \y 7 rwidroc4 R�'hh'4 :±lr Marmodut. r.
04
o J Ch.k i
F 1123._, -
� � 11! 1�x7' Alvan 14t4 Sa l ?lEZ
36-0' y' iepa
•br .5 1.r 7 YT. a
' Itri lam. 14LI
v 442 1 �
1-K5-
11 7 .3 im b '' ,Y !1 16PI
�.9
- Parkto" v
x D 1SL Sbr t b t •� lei 3.4 1#4L M1 i3i
vkk4ba `s lsyl +>� ra^ah Cr44k
IDA lerr N1i11 1t�'P F �P
't' �a Iels I s%mm
e
. LLiu
f _ Broacd
2p. ♦ y Lm b 14• L
113A 11 { f � 141a i r.3 � le M1
P
11614 �7
�T '�• - ;S' Im U3t Lag -
Lim
Slit •r lily
1134 2 s , �v .6
114a ,•p it. Aattiv a 14a3 sp
+r
1,
e01 1 \ � La4_ lidukin4F � ,
7
471 1 rti 1 111! t F.F$ ' l,lltla Saco
� ` •]d'13' . � � `ram � 1 �'

NORTH CAROLiNA FARM waER0�j
RT.1 BOX 105 � 41999
NORLINA,NC 27563 0119
FAX :[phone] NQ� pisct�a�BB pgm`
TEL: [phone]
NORLINA 3-22-99
SUBJECT:APPLICATION NO.AWS930034
ADD.INFO.REQUEST
NC PARTNERSHIP#2
ANIMAL WASTE OPERATION
WARREN CO.
DEAR SUSAN CAULEY,
THIS LETTER IS TO RESPOND TO YOUR REQUEST DATED 2-22-99.
TO I. START OPERATION ON 6-30-94
TO 2. REVISED WASTE UTILISATION PLAN IS ENCLOSED.
HOPEFULLY THE INFORMATION PROVIDED WILL BE SUFFICIENT.
REGARDS,
MARTIN ENGEL

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: . MARTIN ENGEL
Location: RT. 1 BOX 105
NORLINA NC 27563
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Combination Swine Farm
Number of Animals: swine
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
swine x 1.38571428571 tons waste/swine/year = 0 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
swine x 1.676 lbs PAN/swine/year = 0 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE I: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
452
23
36B
FHH
4.5
225
0
50
11250
I
FEB-NOV
END
I
TOTAL111250
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if.operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
FHH
FESCUE HAY - HAY
TONS
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 50 11250
TABLE 2 0. 0
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL 50 11250
*** BALANCE -11250
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available -nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
452
23
36B
FHH
0.40
*0.75
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. if the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21, Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:NC FARM PARTNERSHIP #2
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil. and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: MARTIN ENGEL
(Please print)
Signature: Date: - J ; -�
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson
Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257--
3836
Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St.
Warrenton NC 27589
Signature: Date: _ `,�-3 - T �
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only If additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date.
Date.
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I,
generated by
hereby agree to apply waste
in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
MARTIN ENGEL
R e UA iN S "�oN
WAS
CEP 1 A 'y999
RT . 1 BOX 105 $ Pem►itng
NORL INA NC 27563
Nonp'�sCha�
[phone]
Existing Combination Swine Farm
swine
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
swine x 1.38571428571 tons waste/swine/year = 0 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
swine x 1.676 lbs PAN/swine/year = 0 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIbdAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS—
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
452
23
35B
FHH
4.8
240
0
50
12000
I
FEB—NOV
IDRUD
I
TOTAL112000
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
IRESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste.nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
FHH
FESCUE HAY -.HAY
TONS
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 50 12000
TABLE 2 0 0
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
J
TOTAL 1 50
*** BALANCE
12000
-12000
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres'in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
452
23
36B
FHH
0.40
*0.75
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by.injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils,.during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIgNSS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12.,Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
J
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATIM PhM AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: NC FARM PARTNERSHIP ##2
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of FaciT Own,er: IN ENGEL
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson
Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257-
3835
Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St.
Warrenton NC 27589
Signature: ,`LGc-C�_' �� � Date:
3
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL. WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMEH
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative-c Date:
SWCD Representative:
Date.
Term of Agreement: 0I9_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 12 �.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
. 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I,
generated by
hereby agree to apply waste
in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver: Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 14

J",
JO I
(W JuQ
4048 1
V
I v ce
Y1
T
r,7 — r
V'v
32'30"
�J
Z'
4047
�30
x
tN
4046
70000 A
FEET
(VA, ?0
4045
\V
N-1
-M
-66
C-
A t
3w
)- (('11JJ'1�ii _ {,, �# I �J�'•' f%�-��- I \ % 1_!' -l.� � j(./i ', li �"`.j � •-. /� i �'1 C
—
1.
4044
111K
2,
k)�
?
x,
2U
1' J
4043
36 30' - 10 748 12080000 FEET (VA.) 749 "Y1 ii:fjol- 1'%5(JN I.; Mi 12'30"
78 15'
iu 0 Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
C1.1:111 by USGS and OSC&GS 14N
Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs GN
taken 1967. Field checked 1968
1927 North American datum
Polyconic projection. 'iT
10,000-foot grids based on Virginia coordinate system, south zone,
and North Carolina coordinate system

I( ., I- n l'� ',�+y�`� ° �'tY'I*'y'! ii'i`! +,�y'`�f"l'1•. �j Fyy��4'af� � ,I`,ild i� I'.41Y "' y' ' ,,, i
} 4 s� ri 1• I� y 40, • ' } r+
,y.
I
`;s,�'f�� vi •Ilx`, 'r� +�+' 11 fir: �"F � J
.'`, i�[y i:�r�iy �.�'� �, ,.I 1 •r • r>�}� � }/ /' �,� .Ili!
•+ � } ,t'� ice. ..}ry ,•:. +� 4 .'' 4 l �?"�� �^�'� f ff�e rrlt "• •�'1
. rL �. •y.,1 it +''• `•1 • �, J.,j., IY•4, �1-+
j
' '�'. i`' �.' f• •: �� � _ 4 1".l+,,ram
IP
01,1
Ric'.
64,
cl
P �
• L� � . ►; � �' s6•¢� � ' fir,: �+
(� N i...I,+k
40
LIN
�"i9� x. ! •ti.l -i.I�r + 1' }' t ,y� ,.� ✓' ' :G ,x,_,,,� � �+''t���.r� + I
i rl� ' �•" ''(w' ; „� SQaIJ1 a t••�.f��
�, •�x��:l_-�;:7.. Sir yl: r. �.� � .,6 ... ... a', ,•1� �� .,1yi-4, 4 �I

IVT
F y
L /
• } RBI ,� � � 'r �� `� Yy�w s � r •� ii,.�w ti � �3.i Yr k�[i
., '1 �L 1�. ° i I.�;ia ca •�ML�` �1►. ``}{��j[�_�`y��', x�� � � } r..r. � �'..I rrl�.lri/l !f� t F�Srr.
j4
p� i
,may �•. � --
hit
AP
i
Lii... ti r , i •, r 'il I .l � I' i.
...Y , •..4. :' rJ. �.- C , i$, f `{►r`�r y; ` Ir 2' sly i s }, r
f 'n i 5 r{ I IC 1 1Li i s
':5 .5y� ° , , , . • era' s ' � ` I '� �L� iF,
i
''" � �J�rA "/ rV�, •. "�i'�i •1,. ,f ! t iI 4.�.,I •� _511;:
l

0
A
J
\-Iortality Management Methods
(check which, method(s) are being? implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 2' hours after
Knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from arty Flowing
stream or public body of Water.
rJ R--ndering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
�I Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Depariment of Agriculture
J Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endan2erin2
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
SUnr'Cc cuuse BMPS to conlrol lusccts SE: Slrccifir Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Clutters Accumulation of solids Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
Remove bridging of accumulaled solids at
discharge
Lagoons and fits Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where:
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a deptli of no more than 6 -
8 inches over niore than 30% of surface.
l-XCC!'SiVC Vegtaativc • Decaying vegetation k7lAaijitairi vegetative control 'along hanks of
tirnrtsth lagoons ind other impoundments to prevent
accurnulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waters edge on impoundment's perimctcr.
I rcdec, I'ecrl Sltill:rge
VCCLI StUragc Accumulations of feed residues
Dry Systems
Design, operrte ,trul nt:cintain feed systems (c.g„
bunkers and troughs) to minimize ultc
accunrtdatiun of decaying wastage.
Clcan up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during smuntcr; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Reduce moisture accumulation within and
arotnul immedi:nc perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away l'rurn site:
and/or prcividing adequate cowainnrcut (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain an{I similar ]righ
moisture grain products).
]rispect lOr acid rcmnve nr- hrcttk rrlti accctntnl;ncd
solids in filter strips:rrnnn,l fcud stolaLc:rs
needed.
AMIC - N„vcmhcr 11, 1996, I'agc I

Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Sttecific Practices
Animal Holding Arcas Accumulations ofaninial wastes "19Z, Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
bir Maintain fence rows and filler strips around
anirnal holding areas to minimize
acctnnulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accunutlaled solids as
needed),
Dry Manure I landling ACctlntUlalionS of animal waslcs Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systcnrs day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around mamtre
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accutnttlated
wastes in filter scrips around stockpiles and
nt,uutrc liartrl[ing atrcas as needed.
For more irtl'tnnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State Universiiy,
ltaleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AAIII: - Ncivci hot 1 1, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
- — Cause
JIM1's to Miuilnixe odor - - - — Site Specific Practices
l antutead
Swine production
�W Vegetative or wooded buffers;
19' Recommended best management practices;
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
flirty manure -covered animals
R Dry floors
Floor 5urlaces
Wct loanurc-covered floors
1;9� Sloped floors;
Walerers located over slotted floors;
❑ Feeders at high end of solid floors;
C7 Scrape manure buildup froth floors; `
Cl Underfloor ventilation for drying
Miuuue collectiuu hits
• . Urine;
l' Frecluew manure removal by flusll, flit recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposition
or scrape;;
0 Underfloor ventilation
Vcnlilalion exhallsl f;uls
Volatile gases;
0 ball ntaintenarlue;
Dust
L� Efficient air movement
hidullr surfaces
0 Dust
_k Washdown between groups of animals;
f_-) feed 'additives;
O feeder covers;
by l-ced delivery downspout extenders it) feeder
covers
blush I.ulhs
Agitation of recycled lagoon
Cl I hlsh tank; covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
p Extend fill lines to near hottoln of [:inks Milt
anti -siphon vents
l'ltlsh alleys
• Agilation during wasinvater
© Underfoor*llush with under floor vewilatlelel
conveyance
Pit lerh;uge points Agitation of recycled lagoon n Extend recharge lines to near Ilunonl ofpits
liquid while pits are filling with anti -siphon vents
Lift staliull�. Agilaliorl during sump tank Cl Sump tank: Covers
filling and drawdown
Clrllaidc drain collection • • Agitallotl cfurilig w;Istew;ller 1`3 Ilox covers
ur JIIIIclioll buxes cutiveyallce
Ahl()(; - Novcitlher 11. 1996, rage

' Source
Cause _
_ DMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at
•
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of pipes undenleath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
I-agoun surfaces
0
Volatile gas emissions;
ice-
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
Biological mixing;
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
$
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Pr
Minimum agitation when.pumping;
❑
Mechanical aeration;
D
Proven biological additives
Irrigation simiikler
0
high pressure agitation;
$X
Irrigate on dry days with little: or no wind;
nozzles
a
Wind drift
a
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
0
Ptimp intake near lagoon liquid sllrfaCe,
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basic
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
130ltOm or Illidlevel loading;
sllrta�c:
\
•
Mixing while filling;
❑
Tank covers;
•
Agitation when emptying
❑
Basin surface mats Of solids;
Cl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Seating haslrl Surface
Partial niicrobial dccoinposimion:
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets tmdcnlcalh liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
O
Remove settled solids regularly
h1mitirc, slurry or sludge
•
Agilalion when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
sprcudcr outlets
6
Volatile gas emissions
Cl
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
I lncovcred manure,
Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Suil injection of slurrylsludgcs
slurry or sludge till licit
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 4b ors.;
surtu�rs
(J
Spread in thin tmiform layers For rapid drying;
❑
Proven biological additives or modants
I)eatl animals
Carcass decomposition
IW
Proper disposition of carcasscs
Dead animal disllnsal
Carcass decomposition
❑
Complete covering of CUC.IsSCS in hrrrial.fliu;
. pits
❑
Proper loealion/consirticlion ofclispusal pits
11lclriCraturs T
•
Inconitllcle colllillisllotl
Cl
Sccnndary stack lmniers
ANIO(: - Novemllcr 11. 1994, Page 4

Source CUuSC BMPs to Minimize 041or Site Specific Practices
Staltding water around &Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities 6 Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
1t'1a11urC tracked onto: Poorly maintained access roads 7)1, Faun access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information : Available From :
Swine Manure Managctnew ; 0200 Ru1cfBMP Packet NCSII, Cuunty Exlensiva Ccntcr
Swine PCudnCtioti Darn► Potential Odor Sources and ltemedles ; EBAE Fact Sheet
Swine Production facility Manure Nf:mabement: Pit Recilarge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88
Swine Production Facility Manure Management; Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 129-88
Lagoon Dcsign and Nlanagemcm for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; E13AE' 103-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Arplication Equipment ; E13AE Tract Sheet
Cnntrulling Odors from Swine 13uildittgs ; 11111-33
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
Options for Managing Odor; a report frorn the Swine Odor Task Force
Nuisanec Conccnts in Animal Manure Management: Odors anti Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
NCSII - BAE,
NCSIJ - BAE
NCSII - BAE
NCSII -11A1_
NCSiJ - BAE-
NCSU - Swine Extension
NC Pork Producers Assoc
NCSU Agri Communications
Florida Coo jxratlVe I.xtension
Ahl()C: - N,wcnilicr t I, 1996, P;q;c 5

EA 1ER GEN CY ACTION PEAK
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ a 19,- 9-1 1 4100
ENfERGENCY i41.k1NAGEN- MNT YSTENl t -
SWCD
MRCS
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave vour property to consider that you have a problem. You should make ever,. effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b, pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately,
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes end sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems. houses. solid separator_ -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Nkike sure no siphon occur-.
d. Stop all howl to (lie house. flush systems. or solid separators.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of la_aoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Four phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - -
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask th'at person to contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors address: VA
c. Contractors Phone: -
l..'4 nil?Cr I J, 11-96

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc.)
a. Name: .e '
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised bY MVQ and technical assistance agencies to
re�tifL the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
};e4p problerns with release of wastes from happening again.
Dt�_.lnher 1:3. 19Y6

hd o-
.eh
.po 0
WORKSHEET FOR CALCULATING PAN AND TONS OF WASTE
FROM COMBINATION SWINE OPERATIONS
Operation Code: 6 Combination Swine Farm
APPLICATION METHOD: I Irrigation
Type Operation
Number
Tons Waste
PAN .
Animals
per Animal
per an.
NUMBER
OF
WEAN TO FEEDER PIGS:
1200
.40
.48
NUMBER
OF
FEEDER TO FINISH HOGS:
2300
1.9
2.3
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO WEAN SOWS:
6.1
5.4
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO FEEDER SOWS:
7.3
6.5
NUMBER
OF
FARROW TO FINISH SOWS:
19.9
26
TOTAL NUMBER ANIMALS:
3500
TONS OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO FEEDER:
480 tons
FEEDER
TO
FINISH:
4370 tons
FARROW
TO
WEAN:
0 tons
FARROW
TO
FEEDER:
0 tons
FARROW
TO
FINISH:
0 tons
TOTAL WASTE: 4850 tons
PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR:
WEAN TO FEEDER:
576 lbs
FEEDER TO FINISH:
5290 lbs
FARROW TO WEAN:
0 lbs
FARROW TO FEEDER:
0 lbs
FARROW TO FINISH:
0 lbs
TOTAL PAN:
5866
AVERAGE TONS OF WASTE PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 1.38571428571
AVERAGE PAN PRODUCED PER ANIMAL
PER YEAR: 1.676
SLUDGE PAN PRODUCED PER YEAR:
BROADCAST
WEAN TO FEEDER:
91.2 lbs
FEEDER TO FINISH:
851 lbs
FARROW TO WEAN:
0 lbs
FARROW TO FEEDER:
0 lbs
FARROW TO FINISH:
0 lbs
TOTAL SLUDGE PAN:
942.2 lbs
AVERAGE SLUDGE PAN PER ANIMAL PER YEAR: 0.2692

'3W
A11nML W"TE R"TAGM? a= PLAN CSRTT.FIChTION POR NSW OR =VAHV3D FE=LOTS
" .' Pleas return the Completed form to the Division of Environmental HanaQemant at
the addraas on the reveX'n4 si d& of thl.e Zoz=.
Name of farm Rlease_print) :
T _._ 67
Address : _ _ ft� a .-_ __ _.
Phone No.• - Zid 7r
rjuntX:
Farm location: Latitude and Longitudes Z1 / _ (required). Also,
please attach a copy of a county goad map with location identified.
-
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy etc.):
�-
Design capacity (number of animals) s / 00 Pri- f�.Sr'�w, „�77: �
Average size of opexatiori (12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (scares)s
era aassxxcaatmaaa�aasasasatsumsaaainssnacx�=eaaaaaQaaaanexaavavasamaa��m�xaa7raa-=�a�asa sts��a
Technical Specialist Cdrtiiication
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that sheets the design, construction,
operation and ma-intenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-hava-bee-n_yerified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please. Print)- Jd h ^ U • Ta re: S h
Affiliation: .%C' {
Address (Agency) - !' C Phone No. ZA _•- 3Z :ZX
Signature.- 140
w Dates � AS-
sars�s�aaa- �mLtraav a�aa aarmaaaa�aaaaa:aaamvaeaaaaa��-ma:aa==�as7ri�sa'.C'a
ownex/No= yer Agreeawant
Z (we) Understand the operation and maintenance -procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plats for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know, that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental 'Management before the 'new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a mean -made conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District, pp.������``
Name of LandE (please int) 0,�7�(� �/IJ!w�.,��i4 ;4�J�1 f��I�t�?�3j}s�
Signature- ^M Date: Ct_.
Hama of Maaa if "if
fe nt Er
owner (Please print)c
Signature: �. Date:
ote: A change-5 in land ownersh rer�cires notiEi.catian or a new certification
(if the approved'-p'lari is changed) to be suhmitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 d s of a title transfer.
=. . RECEIVEDtransfer.pEM USE QNLY:ACNkinT#
JUN 13 1997
FACwTiES ASSESSMENT UNIT

RECEIVED
VIATER QUr_ITY SECTION
1 LAGOON DES I GN � 1999 CHECK LIST
//���,�
Non -Discharge Permitting
Producer : __ hj,1 2p7?t!2 A/,6 eF e— _ County: iA� Are 2 EAJ _
®q 1. Obtain required permits (026, 401, 404, dam safety, etc.)
2. Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENG-34) -
a. geodetic map showing lagoon location, distance to nearest
residence, and breach route
2- 3. Soil Investigation Sheet (SCS-ENG-538) -
a. Investigation made by soil scientist and\or engineer with
backhoe on class III or IV lagoons, as well as other
questionable sites. Investigation to be correlated with
State Engineer's office on class V lagoons.
b. pits 1.0 '- 2.0 feet below designed bottom of lagoon
C. seasonal and permanent high water table depths
4. Grid Sheet -
a, location and dimensions of lagoon and buildings
b. location and elevation of soil pits
C. surface water removal (diversions, pipe outlets, etc.)
d . north arrow
e. bar scale
f. pay dirt program must have a scale of 1" = 50'
a S. Storage Volumes (prelude spreadsheet) -
a. designed volume exceeds needs
b. all temporary storage stored above seasonal high water table
c. minimum 6 ft. depth and 1 cu.ft. per -pound of steady live
weight of treatment volume
(]� 6. Excavation and Fill.Calculations (include building pad fill)
7. Typical cross-section (area form)
8. Construction Specifications (area form)
9. Waste Management Plan (area form) -
a. soil survey sheets showing all fields and suitability of crops
b. signatures of producer and person preparing plan
C. agreement sheet signed by adjoining landowner (if needed)
d. include attachment "H" on sampling procedure
®A 10. Transfer Pump and Sump Design (if needed)
11. Operation and Maintenance Plan (area form)
Designed by • — ! -= ._ Date: i7:V
Approved by: e�.✓...►- - G° ET,_� Date:

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner / A97./A)=,iVlk- gff(„ County ('4jkeff&Z
Community or Group No.
Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam__).oFt. Length of Flood pool 3 fo Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 3 -.3i-9 3 _
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Est. Elevall'on
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements Above :Floodwater. Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft.
• f,Jnee c
1 logo 3s0 . ,p � ---- --- - ---
GVOo:D
2 13oo lsv
EN7Ed j '4MFW' n'6 Al C R rek _
G�!� b � • $'/Ye �Tt1 Gee C"�.�
3 Z70D tom • 0,5 ._..S
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach Ale) s e&,eed-r PCn=s yzed L. F-.le L c rs a p
�L I FCA 71 ESc1IJ;e,.1x orC PO-U.-BA_r3c,A =i),ragc D6Wr,urr&eogAA
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21) 'a
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V) .7 _ �A6rn Gc-oars L-''
Concurred By
e
name r tzxzle
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date Z-Z9-93
Date e:' ;Tel -

SCS-ENG-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Re, Wo SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME. to e. DISTRICT W r e
DATE 3-� 7- - - Coumly a
S. C. S. PHOTO SI EE!" Nil. WORK uNrr raa r.-er,
WATERSliEI; AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL ACHES POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVAT1U.tiIST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WEiF RE 110fi1NC;S WERE MADE (Appro:, scale L" feet)
t-fh JtK rvleren[e point in Ceritrr Aar of dam and identity on iAetc A,
I �—Lj
i—-
LS
E
k'
SHOW
DE' ffll
SCALF.
MJtir
ICuntin-4
arof
Let dam -we
wi ba.:A
and
where
spillway
nec.usutyl
BORING
bormaj ffrif
SAuw Wafer
• then
fable
NLJMLLE
txmded
.irwtrnns
R
vie.
AND
and
wi darn
L'LiC7F
barrow
-we
UX
pit
burrnpi,
6rfrn7yj
- setntrate
with
cvrftw;
r.a
line.
—
~I'r
IbiMI
L
a'
+1
—
PL4
—
v
ML
— -7-
—
d
—r—
—
—
—
y—,•L7_r'
19C1ItING-S NIAPY. L1Y �v�M1S_ I,I� — SWNNAT(IItl

�. � L. [V ' i� 'M U��4i�, ,i •!�f, �; r,� ;i��`� F'�f� r'.Y�''i,'.�.. °7 .;�, s�'
eft. •{�+, �r� "` �, r. I � ��.��yl?�,. ��g'}{��,�'��r.
ur
tj
QC%'
AS
�•.,;. ��,� t� � L tt.w 1,� . '� �1 Lv1,'w ►i. :j �iL ' ,� � t '
15.
� !4i � �^` �}�'� r(r j sy .� l �`" , ` � _ �r ti./'r ._' 1 r(��a'�:. I ` '• # �. a -a..�3
7�. 1�'I ,� ' - . •^ � • 1 f �,.'��•�i' ,�• � r• �i'l iy��� • Lr:.�.'' �� (�,1' 'i S �.
i' 11 •ti' k •1 � 3 �y�[• •-4
� ,1� i•i w}ti' a�r ,. `r-' � 1:� ,,• :� �::'TA�j;r. ,;'l�••,1�•"' "��'`"•�:. .'' Y1•F� , . .;, •� ' � �

' '+. �11a� j � � I�� - � � �. f( �� � t r. �( � _ u� ./ � I } 1� a �, ]Q7 � • /�
I) ) �•� •.�, _ Aso ��lL = �� t=Ce
48 1� r7 T �-._w_--�
JJrr
J �= 1�1' `1 '�/ NIc
�
f �'J? 1;`` 1 .I � � J'1 ,,� � �, -1 1 /,,.,, (` . 1 `���. �_ �..1 �`��-_ 1, '• =
32'30",�
1047
1,3
4046
70 000 FEET
VSS
rcj
4045
:1, 1 f. •�36._ :�'.:i. „� ��� :.�• ;� � � �', 53�� FatAft!
Jj aso � �• . -- { r -�� ' ) :
4044
I (/'/-::fit �� ` -. ;� • a°°. - . ,�; :1.� 1_ � -� � _ ,..�— Z-7)
36 3d r ;141 r48 !080000 FEET (VA.) r49 ;�M:NULNS4N r:> M. 12,301,
78 15
ix0 Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
eP,O Control by USGS and USUGS
00 � Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs
` off c
��' b? taken 1967. Field checked 1968
Polyconic projectlon. 1927 North American datum 10.!---
98 MILS 1.41'
10,000doot grids baead on Vlrginla coordinate system; south :ono, JOWLS
end North Caroline coordinate system
1 r1Ar1.mwlrw Ilniaarawl Trwnwr.wr�n M."'J'r 0,18 IIr64

-�-r --Vyr P-P-? --- �, �,
c)
r' -7
r") -7 ss- Qj 8 us�S-a-P
(--7 7 sS
s%�
oo v "07+ o =
r-� > ss
rye
o o o % r
s9l 0, 'y o o
r"*�7S5'
s
005org-
- r9� S'cy -x 00�'
<�b-.Lf-g

'TA bLfi
q so�
r„°.Vd7
"7 7Id fXL v tlg
Lh 8 S Q.-v®
fi s b 1*81 ry 190,9 d7
: fv9f,L vtl-VJ>G
A"Wwns -y-ypm PYLyv,,?

YEAR &6144) ..5'6rffAW B
(3jov-rA G T t o W M EAJ Vo u ARC A-v &Wa Y T'o
S Ee A `ra tlOWP + r Pew Mix 7'V,V T'p 4rP.
SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED; Appw, Z,O ACRES
USE THE SEED -MIXTURE INDICATED:
12.0 LOS. FESCUE GRASS C 60 LOS./ACRE
(VEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMLER 30
12-0 LBS. *PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS C 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1) !�
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
LDS. 11ULLED bERMIIDA GRASS G 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
bo LDS. RYE GRAIN C 30 LOS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
ffD LOS. RYE GRASS G 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LOS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
,ZOO* LBS. OF 10--10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
o1 D D BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW 000 BALES/ACRE )
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDDED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDDID WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAH1AGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT B
LAS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA 6E INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
+-I%A- S -tea. a� MIX
Seca/,

Producer; EN 6E L
. tr
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the
routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine waste
management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is
considered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds
to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side
slopes: .Tr'E se4-o,&f &56e*-r is being
established on these areas. Beginning in 199f and each year
thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized with 800 pounds
of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done
by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three.
This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly
twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump
1

1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 head weanling to feeder x 30 lbs; - 0
lbs
2880 head feeder to finishing x 135 lbs.. = 388800
lbs
0 sows farrow to weanling x 433 lbs. = 0
lbs
0 sows farrow to feeder x 522 lbs. = 0
lbs
0 sows farrow to finish x 1417 lbs. - 0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 388800
lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 388800.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 98.1
feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 90.0 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/EN01 SS/EN02 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 8.1
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
330.0 175.0 57750.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF 80TTOM
Lb * Wb -
289.5 134.5 38937.8 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) =
309.8 154.8 47933.8 (AREA OF MIOSECTION)
CU. YD. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) *
DEPTH/6
57750.0 191735.3 38937.8
1.350
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL = 389371.0
CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 388800.0
CU. FT:
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 33D.0 FEET LONG BY 175.0 FEET WIDE

5. DIKE
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation 102.0 feet.
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
349.5 194.5 67978 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 67978 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 388800 SSLW * 0.01 gallon/lb. SSLW/day * 180 days
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 93561.5 cubic feet
68. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of. fresh water used for washing floors or
volume fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that
recycle the lagoon water are accounted for in 6A.
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
6c. Volume of rainfatl in excess of evaporation
use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) = 7.0 inches
volume
= 7.0
inches * DA /
12 inches per foot
Volume
= 39653.7
cubic feet
6D. Volume
of 25 year -
24 hour storm
Volume
= 6.4
inches * DA /
12 inches per foot
Volume
= 36254.8
cubic feet
TOTAL
REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A.
93561.5
cubic
feet
68.
0.0
cubic
feet
6c.
39653.7
cubic
feet
6D.
36254.8
cubic
feet
TOTAL
TEMPORARY STORAGE 169470.0
cubic
feet

7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Volume of temporary storage divided by surface
area of lagoon.
y
Depth required = 169470 cu. ft. / 57750 sq. ft.
Depth required = 2.9 feet
Normal lagoon liquid elevation = 98.1 feet
Depth required - 2.9 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet
Top of Dam - 102.0 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 102.0
ARE 349.5 FEET BY 194.5 FEET
B. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 93561.5 cubic feet
68. 93561.5 cubic feet
6C. 93561.5 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 133215.2 cubic feet
Depth required = Volume of pumped storage divided by surface
area of lagoon at normal water level.
Depth required = 133215.2 cu. ft. / 57750 sq. ft.
Depth required = 2.3 feet
DESIGNED BY: ��� � APPROVED BY:
DATE: y—,27. y; DATEip� �3

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON
CLIENTS NAME __________________________> MARTIN ENGEL
COUNTY ________________________________> WARREN COUNTY, N. C.
TODAYS DATE ___________________________> APRIL 27, 1993
DISTANCE
TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE =>
1300 FEET
NUMBER OF
PIGS
WEANLING TO FEEDER =____>
0
NUMBER OF
PIGS
FEEDER TO FINISH =---===>
2880
NUMBER OF
SOWS
FARROW TO WEANLING ==-__>
0
NUMBER OF
SOWS
FARROW TO FEEDER =______>
0
NUMBER OF
SOWS
FARROW TO FINISH =_--___>
0
DEGREE OF
ODOR
CONTROL ________________>
1.0
(minimum 1.0
cu. ft. per tb SSLW)
(maximum 3.0
cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
NUMBER OF
YEARS
OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
0.0 YEARS
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL =___=_>
330.0
FEET
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL =______>
175.0
FEET
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION ==========>
98.1
FEET
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__>
0.0
FEET
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION _______________>
90.0
FEET
Depth of Permanent Water 8.1 feet
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
SIDE SLOPES
2.5:1
Permanent Volume Required 388800.0 cubic
feet
Permanent Volume Provided 3B9371.0 cubic
feet
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET> 0 SQUARE FEET
(i.e. pumpout pond 8 other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE ______________> 180 DAYS
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY ====> 0 GALLONS
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION =====> 7.0 INCHES
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =------------> 6.4 INCHES
FREEBOARD _____________________________> 1.0 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume 169470.0 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 102.0 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 349.5 feet Width = 194.5 feet
Begin Pumping Elevation = 100.4 feet
Stop Punping Elevation = 98.1 feet

r l.i
r
A Z
z;stxr�
718�,
p3 =
mr,c
A`#
- S r -
02042-j;
AS
G S--t
f w LN r
,cis
336'`
/ 0 z — 10 4b--e-- ru-4- &trz o, ST
3S o x ,z a w 70, waw S� dP
. r a
�. 3Y y�a� �- 5 b h `F 2 -►- S a + z f ry + LVL
r? b

�l = 6 C/ 7v 6,2-5" i- BY�o r g 4 4i� s� = / 7 0.8 3 co Ste`
, 7S) z '� d �,� ;s �c / 7X-
C7S) 1i (/7Z_S��
Z
✓3 ' �, �/G�,r)(7z.S) + (��.2..$)( y S� taC�S��) (s�.7s�� _
;2880 - i- ,,tA"Mf
�-sr aye a d• v
Encc�.,, wa, f,-tt = G.5—
%ry 3s° Xrsrr
9/ zP6/-416 a•P'Y-
e Aoz
/- a �,r

LAGOON SUMIL' ltY Sidi El- � TYPICAL Ct:OSS-SECTION
i Top Width i
1 � 1
Sottivd top .of dam: lo2.Q
1"10 OHL Construct top of doff,
Fill Yardal;e: c.
�o � cut of4�ka--�-�+�roe
Pad -
w
/ 2 3 i- C y
rrssRroR .740
ZNZ.ktLk�ral CjrcUn olcv._------------_____ ..-____ "Depth d to mind by
Dope 05 an utc4mihrrm:nLt , � t :iCS can site
REMouE 71P SOIL 4. 0 S'X4 iitA7E�'NQG
00" 7o CLAM tINp6R �i.1B,QeiKm�.vT
CVPrWx. 4.00"So
Start land upplicatior�. Stop land 1aiiJ^application - -
Lluv. lOb.4 r el::v. 48.r
L'uiiiliorary V-luc:rrr---_-_--• W--_-______
--
Sant
support-- Troarmunt Volume
� 4la
----Top
-of -Is 1 u�.trlo el cay.--__-__.__
al udgc �,ccu+uul ��t i air
Buttow alky. Re•D
.&, Q
2•.r
�I
i
1y,.r3 r e. r,
drii. Z iill �
SFB ORAUW w 43 Pei - 5*8Y'7 t-%-
Lagoon size: Length .--- Width Cu. Yds. excc vl,t,'-d j8,,4aq ! Y,
BENCH I'IARK DE;zCR IF'' !-ION:
IQ /I r! / ....c w-r o r% 0 -L.. — 1 tl
GENERAL INFORMATION
JOB CLASS:--- -7u--
HAZARD CLASS: • a'
ANIMAL TYPE 6 NUMBER: 7djjfA acm .--,,..
KIND OF OPERATION: - j5Uu&s&y(&t____.__.___�_---
NOTE: If canatruction i:; not
turted within m o year, thi L
pl"n is not valid until ro--
evaluit:ion of flood plain ior
safety hazard in mado.
[-'I vation: - ---loo, o Q
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL WASTE
(SINGLE STAGE)
/4AAZ22 / &A/6dEL, - FARM
��9" a
As&TAt e-Ageo ettr-&__ STATE
U. S. DEPAfyTHENT OF AGRICULTURC
SOIL CONSERVATION E;E.RVICE
TITLE; I�

sWTNN WASTE hhNAGEMENT SYSTEM
B. o eratio
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total of
ZUn 44FAp Jddl/1'!� ( FIML391A 'iv* --� ) . The lagoon contains both
permanent and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be
pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The
design includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capacity for the
volume of waste produced over 180 days, the amount of rainfall in a
25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage;
therefore, it will need to be pumped every six months. Begin pump -
out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches elevation loo. as marked
by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level reaches
elevation ,r
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B) before
land application. The waste material should be analyzed before each
application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of
the area of application should be made annually to insure the waste
is applied as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
rates.
It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -charged
to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during start-up. Pre -
charging reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the
lagoon thereby reducing odors.. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of pollutants
into waters of the United States. The Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management,
has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
2

...r nno 1 r. -xjKZATMr fJT LAUUUN
loaded equipment traveling in a direction parallel to the main
axis of the fill. If pans are not used, construction of the
embankment shall be made in layers not to exceed 9 inches in
thickness and compacted -with -a sheepsfoot roller with a minimum
of �4:passes per unit widffi--of _ f111 : ii.f:t . At any time they
embankment surface becomes "slickened" such that the succeeding
layer will not bond to the previous layer, scarify the previous
layer sufficiently to assure bonding of the surfaces before
continuing with the fill operation. Construction of the fill
shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content
of the fill material will permit a reasonable degree of
compaction. Construction of the embankment shall allow an
additional jo $ for settlement. Stock piled topsoil shall be
spread over top of embankment and outside side slopes for the
establishment of vegetation.
Pollution Control_nuring,Constructio_n_ stripping of embankment
and borrow areas shall be done as they are needed in a normal
sequence of construction. Use temporary mulch protection on all
disturbed areas that are subject to erosion and will not have
substantial additional work performed for 30 days.
vegetation: Vegetation shall be established on the slopes,
embankment top and all other disturbed areas, except the area
that will be inundated, as specified in the plans as soon as
possible after construction. Necessary steps shall be taken to
ensure that a good stand of vegetation is established in a
reasonable amount of time.
Seeding rates are: SFr: s`i ' 4 C W F D 5CFeP,✓6 ,PECr,M,*t Fz-P 4740�
lb.
lb.
lb. 10-10-10
tons lime
tons wheat straw
Permanent Stake: A permanent stake (CCA salt treated 41Ix4" post
or 1 inch diameter PVC pipe with tee) marked to indicate pumping
level elevations, shall be placed in the inside slope at one end
of the lagoon.
2

Producer:
Clearing: All trees and brush shall, be removed.from the
impoundment area before construction is started. The foundation
of the lagoon shall be cleared of all trees, stumps, roots,
brush, sod, organic soil, and debris. All stumps and all roots
exceeding 1 inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth
of 1 foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris.
After clearing is completed the foundation area shall be loosened
thoroughly and roughly leveled, with suitable equipment, before
placement of any embankment material.
cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated to a minimum
depth of ---- inches under the embankment. The exact depth shall
be determined on site by SCS. The trench side slopes shall be
1:1 or flatter and the width will be a minimum of 6 feet, but
will depend on the equipment being used. The cutoff trench shall
be backfilled with material. The trench shall be
backfilled in 9 inch layers and compacted with a sheepsfoot
roller with a minimum of 4 passes per unit width of fill lift.
If sheepsfoot roller is not used, the trench shall be backfilled
in 4 inch layers and compaction shall be equivalent to or better
than the routing of the hauling and spreading equipment over the
fill in such a manner that every point on the surface of each
layer of fill will be traversed by not less than one tread track
of the loaded equipment traveling in a direction parallel to the
main axis of the fill. All standing water shall be removed from
the trench before backfilling is started. /;mac//�+1�-G� 70� .V'uo
.S/vit, LA �'G'!� NS L L)pLa .f "!'u C RA`/ li,Up� +Z 6FA'L aAvA: +J4 eA "f l aYP+'iY. (." a,Y�A)
_Existing Tile Drains: When tile drains are encountered, the tile
will be dug up and removed. The the trench shall be backfilled
with a compacted layer of CL or CH material.
Excavation: Topsoil shall be stocked piled separately for later
use. The bottom of the lagoon shall be excavated as shown on the
plans. Where pervious material (SP, quartz veins, etc.) is
exposed during excavation, it shall be undercut and backfilled
with a compacted layer of highly plastic (CL, CH) material
approximately one foot in thickness. Scarify and compact the
bottom and, where practicable, the side slopes of the lagoon to
decrease the permeability of the soil in the lagoon.
Embankment Congtry_c_t won_;- The material placed in the embankment
shall be free of sod, roots, stones over six (6) inches in
diameter, and other objectionable materials. �t- !1—,AJ <M _
materials shall be used in the embankment. Pervious material
shall not be used in the embankment. Construction of the
embankment shall be made in layers not to exceed 4 inches in
thickness. Compaction shall be equivalent to or better than the
routing of the hauling and spreading equipment over the fill in
such a manner that every point on the surface of each layer of
fill will be traversed by not less than one tread track of the
1

ATTACHMENT A
Page I
J
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer 64 County WA9a E.S1
Address
Kind of Operation 2B96 Ea D
Type of Waste Facility . tew,i,y�,t,G
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capaciy . When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown..
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potental. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered.to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce -the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
F4•
288b animals x_ ,K,?73� waste /animal/yr = total waste
produced.

A' gr
1-Waste Management
Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF. LANA APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different"locations 'using nonmetallic collectors.
ii'. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedd'ing1materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
L. Under -slotted -floor pit
a..Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
-- manure Lto. pit .floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing, a thumb over end
of -conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove
"and empty'slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c.Take' subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. Mix•and add about 3/4 pine to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior.storage basin or tank
a. ;lake sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper-'agizacor pump or propeller -agitator.
b, Take subsaroles from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure: spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, aC.

-2-
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container..
C. Lagoon Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within l' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to -nonmetallic sample container.
A. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and the
ocher 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about-2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations ac least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

9i
II. SAHZLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
j A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
1 residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat iii any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc, iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Nhitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
t
i
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
i
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse; grower, number flocks grown, on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca, Mg. Na,
S, Fe, wn. Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, Mo, Cd, Ni, Pb

i A
f r f Sz k 1�,;�. � ' n,I 'iM� a i s Y \ P
5'&ew {�f vev,. - b F,. :1,r •�' vFw z ,.'; r A '.1
- a } 6l �e key Rr�s r 7s '.���xr+' - y�� , ^l A,�''"* y, � '�>� � may`•:, ' ,
N.
pp
Ve
J� i ✓ ) 1, F{. y I \ i • O
Me
ppwle
X.
n
. 4 r
.�
'3r r. f 'i '+" t� r zf S�e r n �► s • �'�;s �� 1 "'ya'h �. a
US
ti* _} `'�$. i '., � ,y� gi't l fk�:3. � {r�>•�x � E �t �s�t , £ F � ��! y" ..� � • Y � kL a ii ,,
` T♦► ''.> t r+,4 r A s t
• �� h z, C♦'sk ate � Sk*# ,���i 3♦�a- ti
A � .4 1 r w'� � F ! � 4 R �-� �t S z jt £ ,t: .� is s�•# 4 z �` r `s tw e y' j
c r': -: .�� { � . ♦ + i - r , s'� J�i+�tr*�. �.� 'its.' -s,♦,z ''�1 ��:� "� `jr ?> _
yyuQW km=1 of
A-,� -
`Lo rr y� ;SM' I e, x ♦z O n.1 r °
.. w::%':'•:: .' �::i �y �, a'�: Y`�`KYS '� AC. -r't 'n 5: 4 %. �f 5'
5;3�kr'l;a��'t f
CS-: 'rx r3 a .
K a r x
.-•'«-.' ♦ r S' 'S .�,.✓ ' 3.-.e „�Lf) -z,• p 'v st
<? >r':�, l "5 -'-.:.) e .
S. Q. 'b • o N.
} YR?:' f ♦ ^` 'ks r`�,k�i a • ,� t;r k v r4i 5 9 7 :.fs `w , -
f sy.-, �`',<--'Yr? :§ y�r + -r.. f'P.:K ♦.f: .. ,, <r
+, •.e ..'Sr �,�;>=rb \71ST' %rS`/", ''aY aM1iiiMr' 'h'e1av�,�'`. 2, '.',�,. ..`�z .k:-: s Fs �" X
now
- �f� �� r°-r ✓�A�.:'::.. � t {fi ",�y. � i3 ,� {'�;r + �" tt �Pi � f _ Y'k ., ... � s � �
Ykc),' �iY'4 �r % 3 V zkr,i }f `� • is r,f. �t i
_ � v W: 3 ��T - � :,.,qxs \'•�, si"t, r7�$�`T ::�4 ,rt. ..,� '"s ,r _a M1 £ �. ♦ � � 1��-,,
'P �4�. S ..... �_':..�) S" `.' f`7'' 4e',h' s a5 ♦; *♦ sa - �4 ¢ ' � ,S
Se.+ `�an
y t'ia ktr St'< s 4# ` j t '' 'r
k ! - ,?,,i r f ♦� iY }?�,^¢k o F s cC r r.'. - .. u£} _ fci c f s,£. _
r
L
ole
/ U :•{ � - � � 16 �4"' � f cWS ' iSfi.. ^S .^✓'k# v ftls,� .may 4�7.•, f�G �'�'E ^� � �'�''z k - t �; i z � v:.
A
�'
r- 2,-7 t ',4 h fi- 'S '``+. 9h Jk -r�i�\qa-`t ♦ 4 fir/_.:
F'i'4q ttl4 w. �_ _° � ♦ Fa - �e � se:' � � ,
r t Y i_ :%J ^' �}�`- ys < f S.' %. Al W£ r >t'r a ✓.. 2 �. h .a, ) r ti ' -,'t '+�
j?��.,7 �P r y-- x51. r� Yi � f s k � �s1 Js •.F>2 Y Jr £�1+i t`F� s .. 'Z♦�Y
°�Z ; �i,,(; # k, y+r �'> nk.. a�� ti _ >'ly� q��}' .c. � k S x. -� ♦ 'may
" „t.ti F S'� � -�'� :�f'i � �r'� Y r *# k Y r ,� ,,.,y `��f � t. � 1 2 k`S Y ♦ ,:
`_? }.y w '� yY +} h f, t ti `' i'� k -;. '--& r Y 4 -; � -.♦ �� i ,�
,1 gr �' 3 s � r. .,. .... ., �,,,. . e..Y 'lJi-'i tk iy, ♦ � �s's`:,•
A