930023_PERMIT FILE_20171231

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
- - September 14, 2009 �n
Jeffrey P. Bender e
Bender Dairy !`'LL� ` }
i 10 Twin Hollies Ln._-�
Norlina, NC 27563gCrt
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWC930023
Bender Dairy
Warren County
Dear Mr. Bender:
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has
completed a preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is
required before we may continue our review. Please address the following items by September 25, 2009:
Chan a in animal numbers and operation e:
The number of animals specified in your permit application and latest COC are different than those
specified in your Nutrient Management Plan. Please complete and submit a new Nutrient. Management
Plan and an Animal Waste Management Plan Certification, to reflect the correct animal numbers. If you
wish to increase the number of animals or change the operation type you must submit an application for
expansion and provide the required information for review.
A blank copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan Certification can be downloaded from the following
web link:
h :llh2o.enr.state.nc.usla slafou/documents/AnimalWasteMana ementS stemCertiftcationForm091806.doc
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my
attention at the Mail Service Center address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional
information on or before the above requested date may result in your application being returned as
incomplete.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www,ncwaterqualiLy.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Caroina �Naru�lry
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Failure to request -renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may
result in a civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would
constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry W. Wade PE
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWC930023

01Zf t
Type of Visit ;Zutine
ceInspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical AssistanceReason for Visit O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: d %7 4 Arrival Time: d I Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: SR-'%Z + Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _ l pf..! &,x L414
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = ` = " Longitude: = ° ❑ L ❑ «
Design Current Design Current Design
ine Wet Poultry
Current
Capacity Population attle Capacity
@apacty Populationiii
Population
Wean to Finish
fEl
❑ La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
D Cow
Non-Dai
I
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -La ers❑
Beef Feeder❑
Boars
Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkey Poults
Other
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
ONo _EC, I NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[]Yes
N NA
E NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No A
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Z
Date of Inspection D l7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 6VIj
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No - NA El NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes . No [--],NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, -notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No D NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L,J�V0 `NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) !
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
r
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes "No
NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
I. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) n, _y n , ) _ .SMgt 9- i+^__3
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
U Yes kn No U NA
U NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
<No[INA
ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]Yes
;� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNo -❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No❑ NA
❑ NE
S`8T"�i -'v: s'JF�$ +h �¢L�II:L lx �' Wtle-?5`x�c
JEC-tolmments (refer togdestton;#) �Expla�n any YES answers andlor)any recommendatlons or any othesedrawingsafifacilityrtotbAte, i0iainsituation&.(use additionalpages as necessary}:
;s�.�;�,trS�i'ra_.�a1��3_.%.rs:�,.`l�.,.�.�[...s`.^41.x���s c .S•' #'tb!�:'�4�. >1 :�R;<'�..
i
T
G�
ReviewerA nspector Name 7 `�—�IZ�E7 ��'%
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /01 / % / R='
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3 — 3 Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes P4_o'__E1 NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ W P ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
U Checklists Design Maps Oth Der
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stacking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N�[:] NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
No❑ NA
❑ NE
24,
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
;No_, ❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
i'
N NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Cl NA'
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
_.. R&
Addi<tlonal Comments*and/,or Drwuv3�tgs1`Br,A ' ` C "c
,�
4-o I~41,k Ct-5 r-'ez c7� �.ti 1L7
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number j
12 i�ivision of Water Quality q-(7-o
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Co lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: U / I Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 92n C/0-fe l 4(" /Q Lz Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: r Integrator: 414—
Certified Operator: J- f4� "s0_. C Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑, ❑ Longitude: ❑ o = ` 0 «
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
I; J❑ La er
E1 Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
LU—Turkey
Poults
❑
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Population"
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Fleifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: �
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify. DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes El NA El NE
❑ Yes��No[] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ElNE
ElYesV/0
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Num)er:
Date of Inspection 3b
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes�o[01
NA ❑ NE
El Yes NNA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes :No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th�re , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes 7No/
ElNA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes
❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C-r—,'k , H �9j ✓ R �► S
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No El NA
El NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
A
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ YesA
rNoEl
[INE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YesA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
•r
Reviewer/Inspector Name (,t ��� Phone:143 _
--,,�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: JU Z e7
12128/04 Continued

I .
Facility Number: 03 —A3 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ElWUp ❑ Checklists [I Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Z'�E]
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes NA ElNE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
LL1 N _ ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
W N ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

Michael F. Easley, Govemor 1
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Jeffrey Bender
Bender Dairy.
Rt 2 Box 111
Norlina NC 27563
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC930023
Bender Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Warren County
Dear Jeffrey Bender:
On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on April 3, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jeffrey
Bender, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC930023 which expired on April 30, 2003,
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Bender Dairy, located in Warren County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 240 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
MENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:#h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.' 0
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, F.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Warren County Health Department
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC930023
NDPU Files

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT RECEIVED
WAT90 nt int %r/9F"ON
Name of Farm:Bender Dairy
Owner/Manager Agreement Non-DiSGbargePesmttfilg
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ),before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on --site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Jeff Bender
• (Please prin
i
Signature:
Name of Manager �I f different from owner) :
11
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please, print) Bruce Perkinson
Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257-
3835
Address (Agency): 133 i/2 South Main St.
Warrenton NC 27589
1-D C'. c� C'•
Signature: 4
��C.�r,� Cc�-- Date:
. Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
• Producer:
rI
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
Jeff Bender
Rt. 2 Box Ill
Norlina NC 27563
[phone]
Existing Dairy Milk Cows
240.00 head
Waste Storage Structure
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply.waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
• , downwind odor problems.
•
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. if
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate -changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with'15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
240 head x 32.1 tons waste/head/year = 7704 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
240 head x 69 lbs PAN/head/year = 16560 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
And have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC,
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
324
3
32B
CS
15
180
0
23
4140
I
MAR-SEPT
324
4
15
180
13211
�CS
10
14
1721
SEPT
324
5
32B
CS
15
180
0
I
1
124
14320
MAR-SEPT
324
6
32B
CS
15
180
0
I
117
13060
MAR-SEPT
324
8A
32B
CS
15
180
d
6
I i
11080
MAR-SEPT
19B
32B
CS
180
d
2520
It
�15
I
114
MAR-SEPT
324
10
32B
CS
15
180
0
4
I I
I
1720
MAR-SEPT
324
11
32B
CS
15
180
0
5
900
I
MAR-SEPT
324
3
32B
SGS
d
110
I
1100.
�23
�2300
SEPT-MAY
324
4
32B
SGS
4
110
I
�100
�0.
1400
SEPT MAY
324
5
32B
SGS
0
2400
110
I
1100
124
SEPT-MAY
324
6
32B
SGS
0
110
I
�100
�17
11700
SEPT-MAY
324
8A
321B
SGS
0
I
�10. �100
�6.0
�600
SEPT-MAY
9B
32B
SGS
d
64
I
110
�100
�14
11400
SEPT-MAY
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
n
LJ
324 �10
j32B
324
11
32B
324
8B
32B
JUNE,SEPT-
324
9A
32B
JUNE,SEPT-
324 11
32B
JUNE,SEPT-
END
SGS 110 1100 10
SGS 10 1100 0
I
FHG 13.8 �142.5 0
I
FHG 13.8 1142.5 10
I
FHG' 13.8 1142.5 10
I
4
1400
ISEPT-MAY
5
500
SEPT-MAY
10
1425
MAR-
10
1425
MAR-
6
1855
�'fu _!:3
TOTAL130865
• - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
E
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
0 TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
•
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal -waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and'2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
CS
CORN SILAGE
T
12
FHG
FESCUE HAY - GRAZED
TONS
37.5
SGS
SMALL GRAIN SILAGE
T
10
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
• TABLE 1. .220 30865
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
TABLE 2 0
TOTAL 220
*** BALANCE
0
30865
-1.4305 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
•
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
• *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables..
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time -of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
324
1
32B
FHG
0.40
*0.75
324
324-
10
32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
10
32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
- 11
32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
324
4
11
32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
3
32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
W
324
3 323
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
4 32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
324
4 32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
5 32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
324
5 32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
6 32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
324
6 32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
8A 32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
324
8A 32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
8B 32B
FHG
0.40
*0.75
324
9A 3213
FHG
0.40
*0.75
324
9B 32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
�4
9B_ 32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
* This is the
maximum application
amount allowed
for the
soil
assuming the
amount of nitrogen
allowed for the
crop is
not over
applied. in
many situations, the application
amount shown
cannot
be applied because
of the nitrogen limitation.
The maximum
application
amount shown can be
applied under
optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
• Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
•
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct
discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge
of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement -with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal -waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed,.the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
. providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r1
U
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not. be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30. days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
iand public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be.applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers., toilets, sinks, etc.., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate.- Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
C
•
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. waste shall be tested within 50 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall'be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

1�3�
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
St,nrCi -- - -- - Cause: IMPS to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
I ,rnsslc,ri Dairy production Vegetative or wooded buffers
❑ Recommended best management practices
A Good judgment and common sense
PLived lots or barn alley Wet manure -covered surfaces Scrape or flush daily
su rthces
Promote drying with proper ventilation
Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, Pipes, stock tanks
llcJticd ,,rCa5 0 Urine n Promote; drying with proper ventilation
1�"�r Partial microbial decomposition Replace wet or manure -covered be:ddi[tg
Manure dry Tacks
Stwag;e tank err basin
surl-ace
54t[ling i,,r In :,,trf,tcta
h laenu'�, �lurr;• or �lutlgc:
,ltre:adt:r uullels
1 lucovcrcrl in:,nurc,
slurry „r slUdge uu h'Ad
surtae:ea
I'artial microbial decomposition
Partial microbial decomposition ;
Mixing while filling; ;
Agitation when ernplying;
• Partial microbial decomposition
• Mixing while filling
• Agil:,rrort Lvllcn cniptying
Agitation wheii spreading
Volatile gas emissions
• Volatile gas emissions while:
drying
I iir.li Lrnl., Agitation nlfrecycleel l;lg;uun
lieluid while: mnks art; lilling
111111,ide tic.titt ct111ee[ic,n • Ag;ilaliun during; waslcwalcr
of ImIc:ticnr boxes conveyance:
r`11 it : - l-tuvcntl,cr 1 1 , 1990. P,tg;c I
Provide litluid drainage: for stored manure
n Bottom or slid -level loading
Tank covers
n Basin sin -face Inals of solids;
1-.7 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
Agitate only Prior to manure; removal
n Proven biological additives or oxidants
Liquid ['ruin sctllcel solids
f_-3 lieluove solids rcgularly
0 Soil injection ofsb[rry/sl[rdges
Cl Wash residual manure frorn spreader afier use
Cl Proven biological atldirives or oxidants
C1 Soil injection ol-slurr•y/sludges
Cl Soil incorporatin n within 48 llrs
Spread in thin unilorin layers fi)r rapid drying
n Proven hiological adclilivcs oxidants
n Hush rrrnk covers;
Fl Fxlcrtd fill lines to nc,u' hotl„m ot'tanf;s %vilh
anti -siphon vents
n Ilns e:ovcrs

i •'
SliIIrCC
Cause
U141Ps to Minimize Odor
Site Specific PracticeS
Lifl SIJIJOIIS +
Agitation during sunip tank
❑
Sump lank covers
t
T'-
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
1�
LJgi)lill SUrfirt:LS •
V(Ilatlle gas cllllssloll;
❑
Proper lagoon licltlyd Cal)aCily;
� +
Biorlllxlll
Biological
6 S.,
❑
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
❑
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑
Minimum agitation when'ptunping;
❑
Mechanical aeration;
❑
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sllrinklcr
Iligll pressure agitation;
irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nll[�Ics
Wind drift
Minin)um recommended operating procedure;
%(re$5;kfe
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon;
Flltsh residual manure froth pipes at end of
slurry/sludge punlpings
DL:ad i li,nals
Carcass decomposition
Proper disposition of carcasses
Stanching eater miwnd
Improper drainage;
Grade and 1;1ndSC:1pC such that water drains
1atlllllc>
Microbial decomposition of
ukv;j y from Ei6illiCS
organic platter
Nil)(] Iracl;ell mill! pnhlic
Powly mallltailled access roads
access road plalluenancC _
ro.&tk from firth access
Addiliowd Infln-matioa :
-�
Avallable l imp
Caltic Manure Management ;
02bO Rule/BM1' Packet
- —
NCSI1, County Extension ccptcr
Dairy Edm;alional Unit Manure Management System - Lake Whreler
Road Field Laborauory ; E13AE 209-95
NCSU - 11AF
I.:tg,unll OL:Sigri and Managenlerlt
for Livestock Manure `freatnleut
and Slorage ; FBAE 103-83
NCSI1 - I1A1:
Maps Crncnt of Dairy Wastcwater ; EBAE 106-83
NCSH - 11AF,
��alEhratlllll "I Malllrre arid Wasiewaler Application Equipment ;
FBAE.Facl
Sheel
NCSIJ - BAH
Nljl5allCC Cllpccrns in Animal
Manure Mallagernew: Odors and l"tics
;
PRO107, 1995 C0111CI'el1Ce l'rl)CCCEliM'''S
1'101`41;1 Cooperative I:xlt'Ilsll111

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sparta _ cuusc — - l)AIN to Control NSCC15- Sile Sl,ccitic Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters Accumulation of solids Cl HILSh System is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
butters as designed-
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lirguulls and Pits CIla5led Solids 1� Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize die
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
H inches over more than 30°a of surface.
FxceSsivc: Vcgclativc Dccaying vegclatiou jQ Maintain vegetative control along hanks of
t it ,u th lagoons and oilier impoundments to prevent'
accumulation of -decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
I�ce�Icr�
FCCd SI(,r:nvc
• l-cccl SpilI;,gc
• Acculnu(ations of feed residocs
Dry Systems
Design, o1wralc and ulaiutain Cccd syslems
holl.kcrs alit.] troughs) to nlininlixc the
accumrl[at 1011 ofdccayirlg wastage.
'C[ean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
clay interval (luring summer; 15-30 day illlcrval
(luring winter).
Rc(lucc: moisture accunnrlatiora w1111tr1 and
around imiliediatc perimeter of 1i:ud storage
areas by insuring draioagc away I,1,0111 silc
amUur providing adc(lrlatc colrt;linnlcllt (e.g.,
covered Erin for brewer's grain and similar high
nloishire grain products).
Inspect l0r and lemovc or, break up ;immudated
solids in lihcr shills around Icc11 star;Igc;Is
needed.
At~ IC - i ovcmher 11, 1996, ]'age 1

Source
Cause
IINIPs to Control Llsects Site Specific Practices
Aniiind Holding Atcas
Accumulations of animal wastes
Eli[ninate low areas [flat trap moisture along
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to min iulize
accumulations of wastes (i.e_, inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
DI.}' MLjo11rc 11a[Idling
• ACCUMILIatlOIIS Of aIilnlal WaStCS 1]
IZC1nove spillage on a routine basis (C.g., 7 - 10
S} stcnis
day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
O
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break tip aecunnilatcd
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
Inantlre handling -.treats its [Needed.
I-W inure inlOnnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State I Jniversity,
RaIJL�Ik, W, 37693-7613.

• El\,IER GEN CY ACTION PLAN
PHOtiE i�iU��IBERS
DW Clt�r 57i 1 IT
ENCERGENCY -MANAGENTEVT SYSTEM
SWCD ?s2s7- 336
MRCS _,. ,_. Sl4V+? k g2 rI i3 a t.
This plan wUl be implemented in the eve: -it that wastes from your operation are teal ing.
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make Cver•.- effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are sonne action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this ntav or may not be
possible. Surr2ested responses to sorne possible problems .cre listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flo%ti•s to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering ]anoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. - Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinUcrs-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further dischar,,e.
d. Repair all leaks F-ior to restarring pumps. -
D: Lzukage from flush systems. houses. solid sepur:rtoi; action include:
• u. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Mike sure no siplwn occurs.
d. Stop all il���� ,; in the hOUSe. 11us11 s\ I�tCr115. ci _ohJ se; ar ttors.

•
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leaka,!e front base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small surnp or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fiil
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
?. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any dama+e noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or propeny damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Doesthe spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters.'
s. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters`'
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
• a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Dater Quality)
regional office: Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919.-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of rrl. )ve,lient of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that hay c been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , locaI SWCD office phone number -
and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you,
Contact the contractor of v our choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
dam_tge.
a. Contractors \arse: P�'�'_1 3 C S f, u
b. Contractors .address: Rt q W,-rre.. —, NC.
c. Contractors Phone! _3�Sa - s-7 - )-6 6y ;
•

. 6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.j 4 'ec
II X CLA,f&
a. Name: :"�tG� �c'k+ s v S et,1. ar�
Q I- � le
b. Phone: S ay 7- 3�3b rr 5 k&C,
--- - �G.ilks �
is lmplemernt procedures as advised by DWQ and tcclulical assistance agencies to
rc�:Ofy the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
ke--p problems «rich release of xastes from happening again.
0

I•Iortality Management INIethods
(check; which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within ? hours after
kflowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from ant tiowina
stream or public bode of water.
J Rendering at a rendering plant licensed undo; G.S. 106- i 6S.7
Comolete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
7 Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's vaiue without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval -of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
0

OF W A rF� Michael F. Frasley, Governor
ox pG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j [ Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
`{ Division of Water Quality
O �
May 1, 2003
Hal Paschall Jr.
Paschall's Dairy
Rt 2 Box 22
Norlina NC 27563
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No, AWC930020
Paschall's Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Warren County
Dear Hal Paschall Jr.:
On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division).to extend the expiration date.of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Pemvt AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 3, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Hal
Paschall Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system. in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC930020 which expired on April 30, 2003. .
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Paschall's Dairy, located in Warren County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
• of the facility. A
NMI
Non -Discharge Permitting knit Internet http:lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field. 0
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000). •
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Warren County Health Department
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC930020
NDPU Files
0

El
. . I -� q (-f
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Hal Paschall Jr.
Location:
Telephone:
Type .Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
Rt. 2 Box 22
Norlina NC 27563
[phone]
Existing Dairy Milk Cows
200.00 head
Waste Storage Structure
irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation ekchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
• under DWQ regulations.
M
Page: 1
a

' ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
• S. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
•
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with I5A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
200 head x 32.1 tons waste/head/year = 6420 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
200 head x 69 lbs PAN/head/year = 13800 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
0
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
f LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
'
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
15
TIME
574
1
70B
CS
16
192
0
2880
I
MAR -Jul
574 I2
576 4
565 1
575 9
1
NOV,MAR-MA
574 2
NOV,MAR-MA
576 4
NOV,MAR-MA
565 1
NOV,MAR-MA
575 9
NOV,MAR-MA
576 5
526 6
70B
70B
70B
70B
70B
70B
70B
70B
70B
70B
i
0
CS
0
I16
I192
CS
16
192 0
I
CS
16
192 0
T
CS
16
192 0
I
SGS
8
0
I
196
SGS
8
0
I
196
SGS
$
0
I
19,
SGS
8
0
I
196
SGS
8
96 0
I
CS
16
192 0
I
CS
16
192 0
I
y
6
11152
MAR-JULY
21
4032
MAR -DULY
17
13264
MAR-JULY
4
1768
MAR-JULY
1.5
1440
AUG-
6
576
AUG-
21
2016
AUG-
17
1632
AUG-
4
1384
AUG-
5
1960
MAR -JULY
5
1960
MAR -DULY
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
576 15 I70B
NOV,MAR-MA
576 6 70B
NOV,MAR-MA
END
CGS 18 196 I 15 1480
AUG-
SGS $ J96 1 0 5 1480
I AUG-
TOTAL121024
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
•
n
U
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
0
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
CS
SGS
CORN SILAGE
SMALL GRAIN SILAGE
12
12
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 146 21024
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
• TABLE 2 0 0
TOTAL 146 21024
*** BALANCE 1 -7224 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
•
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application'rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
• the nitrogen needs of the crop.
if surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2_ Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
565
1
70B
CS
.45
*.75
565
1
70B
SGS
.45
*.75
574
1
70B
CS
.45
*.75
574
1
70B
SGS
45
*.75
5 4
5 4
2
70B
CS
.45
*.75
2
70B
SGS
.45
*.75
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
n
LJ
575
9 70B
CS
.45
*.75
575
9 70B
SGS
.45
*.75
576
4 70B
CS
.45
*.75
576
4 70B
SGS
.45
*.75
576
5 70B
CS
.45
*.75
576
5 70B
SGS
.45
*.75
576
6 70B
CS
.45
*.75
576
6 70B
SGS
.45
*.75
* This is the maximum application
amount allowed
for the soil
assuming the amount
of nitrogen
allowed for the
crop is not over
applied. In many
situations, the application
amount shown cannot
be applied because
of the nitrogen limitation.
The maximum
application amount
shown can be
applied under
optimum soil
conditions.
0
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be .removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
vm':5Y6 r1 �1�' G �iGt�I�orZ
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct
discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge
of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
• 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
• 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
• 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds . I�TTb� oi= -:YVLC']" � �" Co��'1�� %i2ca." ?,1.,r-k0JZ
22. Waste shall be tested within 50 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
• products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels, pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Paschall Dairy
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Hal Paschall Jr.
(Please print)
Signature: Date: Lf ' �~
Name of Manager(If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson
Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 91.9-257_
3836
Address (Agency): 1.33 1/2 South Main St.
Warrenton NC 27589
Signature: c� �2C Date: �_/
3
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
CJ
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied.
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Term of Agreement: 019_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No_ 2.)
•
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
0 (SEAL)
•
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 14

+ ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
CJ
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIA
iCOUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
40 (SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

.1 ar,
rI.0
r! f) w
IN
TS
vv
rn.
i V
42
4?_3
-A, 0
j­t�.W` N -
I 'for
IZ
lis L
IMR -".e
-00 v
cu
F, NIX
':.lv.. �` ''i` VAT"
_Ali
17� ftt.
' 4",
4. -T.
; 250.r.
-It, "Ur
IVA
51, W.- -k;ap. jL.
0 '1 Ou In
bQ_
- 74;�:
LOP
'K_5.2 Al"w,
R-I

.,,,,-,.,,..., I.,,i, .,C.i,V 1...C.
SOIL MAP INTERPRETATIONS
File Code CONS-14
NAME
• (Interpretative
1 Grouaines
W
s
0
DATE
Interpretations of Soils
70B Wedowee sandy loam, 2-6%
70C Wedowee sandy loam, 6-10% .f
CROPLAND
Deep, well -drained soils which are well suited for most locally
grown crops. Erosion problems are slight to moderate and the
simpler erosion control meausres are sufficient to control erosion
problems. The ability to provide available water for plant use
is medium to high. It is important to return as much humus as
possible to these soils to hell) control erosion, improve moisture
supplying ability, improve structure and make it easier to bet good
stands. For steeper slopes, the erosion hazard is greater.
WOODLAND
Deep, well -drained soils which have few to moderate .limitations for
wood crop production. These soils have moderately high productivity
and no severe management problems except the steeper areas where
equipment operation would be difficult. On these soils, the site
index is 90 for yellow poplar, 80 for loblolly pine and sweet gum,
and 70 for short leaf pine. The site index refers to the height
in feet that the better trees will grow, over a 50-year period.
PASTURELAND
Deep, well -drained soils which have few limitations for pastureland.
Severely eroded areas may require additional effort to obtain a
satisfaictory stand. The ability to provide available water for plant
use is mediunn to high. Estimated annual per acre yields under a
high management level is 9 animal unit months. Animal unit months
refers to the forage or feed requirement to maintain one animal
unit for a period of thirty days.

9 E1\1ER GEN CY ACTION PLAN
PH ONE INWBERS
DWQ q 1- Y7a¢
EMERGENCY NIANAGEvtEvT SYSTEM
S W CD Qfa �.S -- 4Z
NRCS (V gW1- 3 4
This -plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make ever-: effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the Iagoon immediately,
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close vahes to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems. houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. ?hake Sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house. flush Systems, or solid separators.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or side%vall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to i
flowing leaks- possible action: y
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burro"•ing animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as -soon as possible.
?. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or propeny damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local MRCS office for adviceltechnical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name: o5' " Vn 2.2.5
b. Contractors Address: T I 4-TTL f&rJ A/c-
c. Contractors Phone: !ry& --3'Y.2 e-
D�.�,..-mhor I o, 11.:o6

b: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon {MRCS, Consulting
• Engineer, etc.) u
a. Name: I12 AA t�11AA/5 Z [� •c�►E-►"l�saxi
b. Phone: 4" -/UG 6
0
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage. repair the system, and reassess the «vante management plan to
ke4p problems with release of wastes from happening again_
Dt-c,-mnzr IY96

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor -Control Checklist
Source Cause Rh1Ps to Minimize odor . Site Specific 11'raclices
f �nu�tt net Dairy production Vegetative or wooded buffers
17"'Recommended best management practices
2r Good judgment and common sense
Paved furs ur bard alley Wet nlallllre-eovercd surfaces �Scrapc or flush daily
surfaces �' Promote drying with proper ventilation
2-1toutine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
llcddud areas
a Urine
FYI'romule drying will) proper vemilation
• Partial microbial decomposition
Replace wet or manure -covered betiding,
h1.11turc dry stacks
0 Partial nlicroblal (Icc0lliprlsitiolk
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Slural;c lank or basin
• Partial inicrobiai decomposition ;
h
notion, or told -level loading
SllrlaL:t:
• Mixing While filling ;
❑
Tank covers
Agilatiull Whell elliplying
n-
Basin surface inals of solids;
fVJillli)li'LC 1011111101f and lttlllld additions
Cl
Agitate only prior to nianure removal
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling l)ilSlll SllftaCCSa
Partial microbial decomposition
0
Litluid drainage li'onl SUILled solids
•
Mixing while filling
0
Remove solids regularly
aIIIII-:, slurry ur slurlgc •
Agitation when spreading
❑
Soil itljecliun of slurry/shidgcs
,ltrcaLJcr uuticts a
Vufatile gas emissions
Ci
Wash residual manure iron) spreader after use
l7
Proven biological additives or oxidants
l IIICUVC!`Cd lnantln:, 0
Vulatile gas emissions while
fi
Soil injection ul'sltlrry/sludges
slurry or shidge uli lield
drying
Cl
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs
surlaccs
Cl
Spread in thin unilorin layers Jor rapid drying
n
Proven biological additives or ox idatns
I'1lL.11 LIIILS
Agilalioll of'recycicd Iaguoll
Fl
I'ILIS11. tack cllvess;
liquid while tanks are lilliut;
OulZiLlC th.lin cullcc 011. • Agitation during wastu%vatcr
ur jultcliuu loxes conveyance
AN1(W - Hovctuber 11, 1996, Page
Emend fill lines to near bolloill (it 'talll;s with
alln-siphon vents
fl Box t:ovu,s

Source Cause DMPs io Miointize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lift stations 0 Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sunlp tunk covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Labuull surfaces 0 Volatile gas emission; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; er('orrect lagoon startup procedures;
• Agltauon 177 Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
2r Minimum agitation when pumping;
El Mechanical aeration;
Cl Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler 0 111gh pressure agitation; Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nuzzics Wind drift 0- Mininium recommended operating procedure;
11111p intake hear lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Ptunp from second -stage lagoon;
• flush residual manure front pipes at end of
s Vrry/sludge pumpiltgs
Dead animals Carcass decomposition Q' Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water armind • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities • Microbial decomposition of away front facililics
organic matter
Miul tracked olio public Poorly maimained access roads Farnl access road 1na1111Ctl:nice
10aLiS 1'10111 farm aL'CC55
Addiliouaf lnfi,rnruion : _ Available From:
Caulc Manurc Management ; 0300 Rule/13MI' Packet NCSI1, Colinly Falension Center
Hairy Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory ; E BA1: 209-95 NCS[1- BAF
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatincin and Storage ; EMA1; 103-83 NCSI l - IIAF
Managemem of Dairy Waslewater ; EBA1i 106-83 NC_SI1 - BAL
(:alil)latiuln of MaIlLIN and WaslewaterApplication Equipment ; MIAE Fact Sheet NCSIJ - BAE
Nuisaiwe Concerns in Animal Maniire Management: Odors and flies ; l'ItO107, 1995 Conl'ereiice l'ruccctlifigs Florida Cooperative Extension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Coulrol Insects - - - Site Specific Practices - -
Liquid Systems
Flush Ciuncrs Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
❑ Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids ❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to ntiltitnize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
liaccs5ive Vegctallve Decaying vcgctalion Or Maintain vegetative control along hanks of
cirowth lagoons and other impoundments io prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative tualler
along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Ivry sysleills
l �c�lc�� l cccl StfillagcPr Desigo, operaic and maintain feed sysicnis (c.g.,
bunkers and irOiighs) to minimize the
fa Cunttilaliull of decaying wastage.
a" c1can up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
clay interval chiring; summer; 15-30 day interval
during veinier).
Feel SlwaLn: Accumulations of feed residcles - ItuluCc ettoisiure slccuiuulilt ion widlin and
around innnediate perimeter of teed slorag;e
areas by insuring; drainage away From site
and/or providing; adecguale containment (e.g.,
covered bin lOr brewer's grain and similar high
it istllre grain producls).
P� ittspeci Air and remove or break- up accinmilated
solids in titter strips arriuml tCed storage as
needed.
AMIC - Pluvculltcr 11, 1996, Page 1

Suurce
Cause
BUIPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Animal 1 loldinb Areas
Accumulatious of animal wastes
❑
Eliminate low areas [liar trap n►oisture along
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
D
Maintain fence rows and filer strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry ftilanurc I landfing
. Accumulations of animal wastes
❑
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Sys[ctns
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
❑
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpitrs.
O
Inspect for and remove or break up accunullated
wastes in filter scrips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For inure infimnation contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, Norih Carolina State (Jniversity,
Raleigh, NC, 77695-76)3.
a
0
8 A 111 • _ 1J......... 1.... 1 1 100r

Is
•
J
D
0
IN-Iortality Management `-Iethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three fe--t beneath the surface of the Around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of eater.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
'.� Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
C4,:e^.b-- f 1t}c,�)

1
County'
pcmtor.
Sit=
,TaC1Ia r NtttrttW.
SITE �IXIICN RECORD
r
Gi��,� 1=8.�rzi NBmr; �✓�����
Fi3ana- !4 S7 %�(3 ?
on She Represcntative. Phone...
Mysica! Addms
Mijiliag Add :
Type OF Oprx. apa., Swinc ` Poultry Cartfc •`�
r,sig D a r.,� :�e mbar o f Ani r s cm Sits:
z :tircae-I I ' D ' Lou RL*, . 2.� ° ZL
Tyaz� of ("Imand • � __ Amial .�
Circii Y*s or vc
DCcs 'u:c ,Ssidw-v-d Waste Gti:1 avt nZxiwat of , I`CCt + S jr= 14 :,car Stcr,:� 4vc l
(�� crosier ztc?y I Foot,:. i c: es; _ es r No Actual
i cr Cac+ Roes w1ch more than cr--- :Luc;c is. Tease --Adrasi the cC,:W laganas' :rC=' C td'!ndcr Om
CJ�II,i:fi:tl$ SC�:icTII.
Was an SC:'�f� o�?s�'T'{� I.�.:I t.�' i�Catt(3)`� Yea D i�lU �'�as F!.= Crasioa yi ti= �7?:.yC% c"a
Is ?.CT.::'Uc'," i��' sys{I�Bae''arl3r�c� ieasiar.? Yes r y iS she G:vC: crab �d-aaaw. 'cs t o
j9)'111 9
Y

L
f Visit 0Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 � Q Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: __.')�L _ -g C'ti>V_R_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: L-
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: L2 i7
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = O =' = Longitude: = ° ❑ I = id
DTRUNI Current Design Current
;Design ?Current
Swine C.a laaeity Population et Poultry Capacity Po pul horn
Ca#tle r k i� Capacity Prop lation
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai
Cow
c
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La et
❑Dai
Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
'a' `'``s'
Dry Poultry
���
❑
Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑
D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑
Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑
Beef Stockei
Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑Beef
Feeder .
FOBoars
❑
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
her Ot
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Foults
❑ Other
Number of Structures;
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
6No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
16 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
do
❑ NA
El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

T
Facility Number: — .Z I Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ):3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) Co Z.J
13. Soil type(s) C,4CO3
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination D Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
Wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
JComments (re e to qu tang:#),.� E ipla >a any Y S savers n' ��or any re�caommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings ofifacdityto betterteaplainsttuahans ,,{useadditionaltpAges &as necessary):
a ' - : w "`�:%r:i `"A . `;_`9RF, .
l
Reviewer/Inspector NameLIWA Phone: 5'71 y7ab
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection !
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
1.114 'at20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWLP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate b x below. 1A ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA [-INE" kt�
❑ Waste A4lication ❑ Weekly Pfeeboard LJ Vaste nalysisJ ❑��/nalysis El Waste Transfers ❑Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ .120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes �O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
' If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ,I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yese(No
ZNA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes .LI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[--]Yes JZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes [;?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ,?�NO
❑ NA
❑ NE
x.
Additional°Comments. and/or Drawings.-i_*;xMF�,=;�.t,�,
lei) nise-o —r% rip cAf ae- C_kmz WT- tea_ FAQ,, �
Z, ) T� tikac �w c�.► tie .1cF &,� ` �— 5 A ^"�c.t�s .t n Utz— ,3 Ltd :a c 6 SzT
z?
'st
E W L�- 0.1 M fi
a•
o
CtA L4 , r d rs fN C
12128104

Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above reshold: .........................
FarmName: ................. �. J d R- ... Q. '.:..`......................................... County:.......................................................
U
OwnerName: ................................................... .............................. . ........................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Mailing Address:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:..... r` ._... ata`.2'...................._........I...............I.... Integrator:............................................................... .......................
Certified Operator: ................................................... __ ................................. ..................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude • & &° Longitude • «
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Disebarzes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes [ KNO
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes edNo
10
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Identifier: ..............................•...........................................................................
Frechoard (inches):
12112103 Continued

• Facifity Number: --I ]f— _2 3 Date of Inspection L/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 9*0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ZNo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 4!5'No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes )2"No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes JZNo
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? []Yes ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type r',Z1SA') &0* %"j �
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes , f No
❑ Yes 3 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes .Z
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes �No

Facility Number: Ct 3 — �3 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes El1�10
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes No
23.
Does record keepin need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste App ' ation ❑ Fre oard ❑ Wast { #nalysq El Soil Sampling
f l
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
.010<0
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes gNo
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑Yes No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes ❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall [:]Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Type of Visit tyCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit GJ Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: L Time: 19 :is'
IJ
�/ Not U erational Below Thre hold
Permitted �ertified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 35rp ;-e— Da; County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry P Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 4 0 it Longitude • 1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacitv Po ulation Poultry Capacity Population Cattle...,. Capacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder I JEI Layer I ❑ Dairy ,�
❑ Feeder to Finish I ILI Non -Layer I I JLJ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Qther
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design CapACfty
❑ Gilts
i".
❑ Boars Total'SS1�W
Lagnnnsl� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑La oonArea ❑ S ra Field Area
e olding Poins f Soild Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem �r
s..
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IZNo
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field El Other
[[ XNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifycs, notify DWQ) ElYes � No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated [low in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes No
3, 3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): t
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — 'L Date of Inspection 1 O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes OrNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ON
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes E2(-No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding El PAN El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes � No
12. Crop type Chik� (i S • A rID 1r . V, .tor -cr )47,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ZNO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Regiiired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the CertAki4 Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ''ll ��..,.,,
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irsetion, freeboard, w011c anal�sis & soil s�ihp1pfcports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 10 �?No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes �?No
❑ Yes P�NNo
❑ Yes J`QNo
❑ Yes ldNo
ElYes [3 No
[] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Camments:,(refer to question #) Explain any, YES answers and/ar uny recommendations or anyrA Me.'"then comments. ;
..ffiq"As.�x ,,. .
Use drawings of facility to!better explaintsitaatuse additional pages as'necessary): Copy Final Notes
�Field
.
J ��� ��-�►��� spin. G f�`�J 1 T� A?fLL( o A &v- 0 9CO � ear- �- A
�� ��a cJ JE Cs E.Tt'1�.' �..f �.•I t/�G�.T�I�� SYfl i �
p4t�A'S'oic..s
Reviewer/inspector Name 77 '?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t .-. Date:
05103101 I f Continued

I Facility Number: fq 3 — Z3 I Date of Inspectioni-Ly
Odor LUSIMS
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 'Idyes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes iNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes WN,
30. • Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 9,No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes /No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes [21/No
Additional Comments and/or Drawgs:y' sn� fit; .r ;, iz =� XA::,
m
05103101

State of. North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh- Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
NCDENR
EwARONMeMT ANo NAG-URAL REscuRces
Division of Water Quality
September 23, 2002
CERTIFIED NAIL
RETURN RRCExPT RROURSTED
Bender Dairy
Mr. Jeff Bender
Rt2 Sox 111
Norlina, North Carolina 27563
Subject: Notice of Violation
Bender Dairy
Facility #93-23
Warren County
Dear Mr. Bender:
On September 12, 2002, Mr. John Hunt of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection for this hog farm. This is a routine
inspection conducted annually required for animal operations that have an
active animal waste permit. During the inspection it was determined that
waste samples were not being properly collected and analyzed in the time frame
required by the permit (Permit condition III. 4.).
Also for the holding pond a proper protective vegetative cover was not
being maintained as required by permit condition II. 10.
You should respond to this Notice within ten days of receipt. You
should include in your response the actions that you have taken and will take
to address this violation. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your
cooperation with this matter. If you have any questions please call at (919)
571-4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Warren County Health Department
Warren Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]oo
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

On Oet'$oiltand WaterCOIISet"YatiOII ? °4i' " I !! a I 1
--:. y
Type of Visit Z) Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit dD Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4 oZ Time: ' �b
Facility Number 3 �
�/ Not O erational Below Threshold
Permitted Certifed 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: —� G� q-'a_P,Ejz County: P,&
Owner Name: f Phone No:
Mailing Address: Z '320-- f11 I�aRL:I,(A �L 7 7 sb
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: �e:l��'F��F— integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: 22-2 `%
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 53Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
' rDQStgn'' CurrentDesign i� urrent; i -,'I tpi 3slitip Design' " Curre1
ADS I '�o u anon..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
a sctty l'o uatlon. n aelt�.�.° a ula
❑ Layer +
,i
';,, Dai 20E
1 .3
❑Non -Laver i ❑Non-Dai
❑ Other
Total Design=Capiai*y
Total':sSLW
i Y i
Number of Lagooas ; '. ii Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La o0o Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Halding`Pends f. Solid Tr;aps :. �i ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
MI
Discharges & tream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q.l'its
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other ��
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes 2rNo
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Lallo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E21No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes b-eo
Waste -Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway [:]Yes &No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 43
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: c13 - Z Date of Inspection /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ Yes .LJNo
_Q'Yes r-1 N.
❑ Yes YJ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 2rNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? Imo ❑ Excessive Pondingaa ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes .ONo
12, Crop type — - c.a ea1 -S LAC'- _ S • <P .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan '— �—� ' g p 'gn g (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes r" �..
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑,/No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes O1 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ErNo
Reauired Records & Documents Ir yy�gg
17. Fail to have Certificate of Covet9ge�fteneral Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ;3No
cc�� l a
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Ce�tifi�d Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
ra/ rz/4r 3r .4 ❑ Yes zJI&o
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ ' ' ation, freelyoed, wastPtCmlysis & soil petfple reports)
'iti-y-.�•Tk��
o IRrYes
�AtL
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
ZNO
21.
Dad the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
O<o
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
—[no
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
)2'Nio
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
,__,�10
La o
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
'E3-.P{Yfitl 4� Ea....FE.. ? -...� € .t�Fr.,.-n,{€ e3A ;:F.e.e srj�ct„d Yd€ - '..<!E f 3G3.,:..6� `..jtC 3 3 €
Con intents (re%rfto quesi an #) E:tptain arty,Y r answers, xndlor y€;recot>�itrtendatiuns `rtr env tt€er c�mIfti, € 5! '
3, �E
i Y' i 3 P "tl F'..=� �L-3 :<�.p. ...> eF• } :E!E 'd " �q . F(€y
-€- 6 `! B �<..'.. ... €.-. €.f _v... €-...E3q. 32•,i! 3. 9d da•e!" �� i�:{[.. .� . §�de'i £� $d (S'd 1!¢..!... :�ha..ff..86§ .3.::aaF� i t E .t}cf{�} k>y1�.F...d F. .....>.
4dci39$tioua as fuecessary) g g
Use drawet;gsEEof iacilitx to better etrp#lain€Es3te
ipy'ag4es{ gFtg`
i;tlo}W,(Lu
geld Conv ❑ Final Notes
d €.
..
SQL`OS MjPL.! fJ
i�� t►1p�s SaM4�-E.S Pe
Y���Y C�flI.C� i� 5,n-tv Td t4-_ A, P.-S.A-4
Si1FalJL9
S,prM�l, t✓�A Mlr,� �..K) ,.1.t� c�.7,s� ccC�E�'�b.� i c-rii--�"�'PL�� S .
--- vts
Ii Jst- cp (x1L.A+t� o Mf1� r1
(A+t Ql'G 119siO�fCPef�-
h'tS "teat. XeRx `' G- cakrum -Oi5ux5'S '^I WK2F_4S4C,Q
p zcrtr5srs
y. F $ S 3 'a3j✓ �$ - { 9S f € i E �EK €` d i-. �,P $ i
ReviewerlInspector Name=•FF $ ' dP „� € %, S� ,p9.'l ;�., ;
, .�€
Ej` , . . , €.. !, P _ _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2. ttZ
05103101 1 Continued

Facility Number: '13 — Z 3 Date of Inspection - 1 a
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes Z"NNo
❑ Yes ICJ No
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes <0
❑ Yes 13
❑ Yes Y "1
Additional CotnmeiitsxandlorDiiivvings: '.
05103101

Z-12-, f b
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit (a'fioutine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 2 Date of Visit: 2 ►tom O Time: 9-3 4
_f Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
.0 Permitted ,QC"ertitied © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name:.............. ... h �.... �....... ... Count.............................................................................
.... . ¢.Y............................................................. y:
OwnerName: ................................................... .................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:.............. Phone No:
................................................. .....
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:........-� 8�.�............................. ...... Integrator:.......................................................
Certified Operator: ........... J.��r... r414.2... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry [ACattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' � �°i Longitude • 6 •6
Design Current
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
"❑ Gilts
.10 Soars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Desigrn Capacity
_,TotaISSLW:
Design Current
CaDacity PODulation
❑ Dairy
Z z a
❑ Nan -Dairy
Number of Lagoons ;: ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field
Holding Ponds / So1idITraps ; El No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes FeKo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of [he State? (II'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 2No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑mo
01/01/01 Continued
Number of Lagoons ;: ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field
Holding Ponds / So1idITraps ; El No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes FeKo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of [he State? (II'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 2No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑mo
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: qj — Z3
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of inspection Z 1
❑ YesIzNo
Structure 6
...................
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes EXNo Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes JNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes [-fo
Waste Application /
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes 9No
12, Crop type CZ0_4 S�� 6 af►r'..l "F�Sc,,,E GAP Z
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes J&No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes gNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 2No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .............. i..q...............
Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 'Fe�o
XAre rock outcrops present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
�Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfteld boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documen
19. Fail to have Certificate of ve g?e & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0"No
`I
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified A imal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iet WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) wzI/ a. riz;J�,� El Yes � No
171L D .r LA�
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, frecoard, waste a aoysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes '2NNo
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,dNo
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes �3'No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ,E No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 'Ca &o
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ,0 No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes "No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: y� — 7 3 Date of Inspection Z Jb c7 Printed on: "4/7No
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ZNO
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) []Yes No
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ;3 No
34, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fitl pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ;Z No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
UAaWAA1�J,V1 AiA4AAA1.�'u W�AIC AACf C7CpiaAAA �4AUFA AAVAAA. �YAC AACIAAA LAUAAiAAlaa`C� ifS AICA.GAJ7AA yJ ,. ;.
❑ Field Copy [I Final Notes p
r
G��� ; �G c.).0 ,P4a.i `TNe+u,&A- NAc.,PAX ram, �To at.c"'J �� 14cC4Z-F-AS z<.
1,4 rt j (h e1F zt* A
I g P>cn e c,i, Ll.- c+JF k.- W i r* 'Ftem; TT #eJ G A 3-,�, Lk r P,2,3 c C�00 9-� �4
LL
��s � r A � 14'� t„t T►i A 'r' t2ss'r � o nn ca � .Z £, c.q Q'o � `� AI:A-nf c�'�
pD) APv; � a.✓p-c_ Qnr�✓ 13�s.'v�' ��r;s'� /G s�,✓�-T'�c,S_
s r SSA Pn-e,r fS T -60�
L A e. P%S P Li ter M!; TH G TL F� �E� r` t/�� ✓ice ✓� `^� �`�G
a/z- 6a. ,d-o f4bG PAM4G4 V-Cze A.,[
IJA 'lZ� CEJ� W ) c" �J" cu F—_
z } 3 E A a, - r+
ALL,a v,� 5 .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: z 11(.
01/01/0I

- 01)i sion of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and, Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit 0Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: co Time: Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility Number Z
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: county: +Q°�'
Owner Name: (� f �' � a t c -r S t 'i` -N— Phone No:
........ ................................................................................ I..................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................."I'itle:................................................................ Phone No:........................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................... ............................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ....-t �'.F.If 3C_r o � Integrator: ......................................................................................
..... ............. ............................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
[]Swine ❑ Poultry [ the ❑ Horse Latitude 0' ZE 0 3 °° Longitude ®• I (, t
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer Dairy Z C)
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lag,-nn Area 10 Spray Field Area
oldi onds / Solid Traps I ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes , 3`No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ii'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? []Yes j'No
h. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes J3'No
c. li'dischanze is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ET'No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Qlgo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ;D"No
Structure I Suructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
r�
Identifier:...........................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

1F4cility Dumber: zr73 — Z 3 Date of inspection 1 n LS o
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 2fNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? JL2`Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes dNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes Zo
,Paste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑Nitrogen ❑ Yes o
12. Crop type................................................................................................._I............................ ..................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes,E�No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes TdN
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
Required Records S Documents
Z./ .yyqq
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &GeneraGl cr tI'readily available? ❑Yes o
9f
aste Management Plan readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) r❑ Yes �io
❑Yes No19. Does record keeping need improvement'? {re/ fZoar, 3�s1t7e analis &soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes El"No
2L Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes1-11'110
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(icl discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 181�0
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 2'1Vo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes E] No
'No.,violations.0'r. defieiendes.Were noted.durinjg.this:visit:. I'oti wiJI r.ere.iye nog further
eotrresbiHidence; i boitt: this visit:.:
Comments'(refer,to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or an ,.recommendations or,any other comments E r
Use drawings'of facility to betterexplaiiisituations. (use additional pages as
i4 Wtite C-bR- C_.a.rr
-7) C J -O_r� Du�r_ F o t'— M o v t h] 6,
�A��r�.34�
GtinlT +rS r s A JO f9,­aKr£Q Q�S'i�-~cam GRA5S �oJ tZ� Alla�.f5 �w��A��
'V `-_ c-r`o tL VQ
i'►JG— Fe-Et� Samoa -a G� A�� 4 -f vt°Dols A-<, c�'rk +� �J�•raFi�
Go�4 _Sag C"actxi�nlS-
6
Reviewer/Inspector Name al-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /OrZS'M
1 /6/99

I.FacilitylNumber: 3 — Z,2 I Date of inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
l t
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor below [—]Yes ZT�o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes O-No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [�10
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 9,N/o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes plVo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes � o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes UUNo
'Additional Comments andor ra►nngs:
5/00
5/00

f
Division of Soil and Water Cnnservatson O eration Rerriew`
€ :'+6
13 Division of Soil Water Conseryahon ` �Compl►ancerInspectioirt � ; �
�:
3
1" ?E -,4
-and;
ivision of Water„ Quality Comp[tance inspection " a
`, € 3
+_
- h
Agency, Opeia4on
,thei
outine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DW2 inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 3 �3 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspecliou o•0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
10 Permitted )d Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 113 Not O erational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: pr Count R-gF i................................................
�. y
OwnerName: ........................... i ..................... . ......................................................................... Phone No:...........................................
Facility Contact: ................................................................... .. Title: .. Phone No:
....................................................................... ..............
MailingAddress: ......................................................................
Onsite Representative: 5) �'.0
Certified Operator: ............................... . .....................
Location of Farm:
......................................................... ....... .......... ........1.1,..........................
........................... Integrator:...........................................................
....................... Operator Certification Number:......,.....,...
... ................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude �' �� �" Longitude • �' �'°
Design Current ' Design' - Current Design Current,
Capacity PopulationCactty PoulatonCa acit PopulationSwine oultr..
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy 7—P 1 Zc7
ElFeeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non-Dairyis
'!
❑ Farrow to Wean - y
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder '
❑,
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
. ❑ Gilts, `k Ii J t f M� l I' 1i € 'i' fll r , 1=
❑P, 3 t i v 1 t
Boars n TotalSSLW
Nijunber;of:Lagoons I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
r3, Hording Po�tds / SolidTraps i , ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Systemi.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes L31NO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �?No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes "No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 'Yes o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [IYes to
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes EVo
Structure I Structurc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 66
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........ :3.'5............. .. ....................... ....................... .............. .............................................. I............ ..........I......:.................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the tnte rtty any of the st ctures ved? (icl trees, severe erosion, []Yes A2No
VVV seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 7 — Z Date of Inspection
6. Are there structure's on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
_G2,4 P-4J S T CAA G E
M
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes VrNo
❑ Yes {Q(o
❑ Yes RT"No
❑ Yes 2f'No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ONO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? .
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
• : �'VoyiQlatitgris'or• clercieuc�es •were pQte�• d�rrfng #his;visit: • :Y;oix wi#� •Seceiye �o fu>I•t�te� • ' • :
correspondence. about this visit. .. . . . • . • . . . • . . . .
❑ Yes ;no
❑ Yes l�o
❑ Yes Pll�o
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes l�fo
❑ Yes �To
❑ Yes 'f "(O
❑ Yes No
❑ Yesy�No
'r -,:. T <r... , F • `O;V? •. Wli ',V pI 'J :"U'; L 'N"i r, I._
t Yi FAC :Li T, E,S fvt LtCr A1kA n/TAF A wcs`rc L•� -S�s +0_0
Ssac4A. A14PS C>�T�l>Ft�s+�o...r
C>, "s S E" P (A J-f ro
7) JC VPr_ DQ--r S TM cm.f TeSL
Reviewer/inspector Name
., i11 :'Ll `: I
M
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Date:
3/23199

Facility Number: 3— Z3 Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of'properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Z'No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ZNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ONo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes JEKa
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes �No
Additional Comments an or rawings �+ 'a € I �€ tt `.
i. '-E�Et 1t�.� �! �t_I, it€€iF
i
3/23/99

2] Di of Soil and Water Conservation [] Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
Ind Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other J
Facility Number Z Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered Certified 0 Applied for Permit [j Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
r� p
Farm Name: ....... ./....+�.. �✓ ��..... County:..l`+...........`1..................................................
............. r.............................. �e
OwnerName:.......... . ...................":..... ......✓................................................................ Phone No:.....................,.................................................................
Facility Contact: .,, ...................... ..... Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address:... .... �:...�...... ..1.1.!'......... .......... ............. .7.. ...�o....................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:.......K.................................................
................................................. Integrator rator..................
: '
Certified Operator........................................................................................................ . Operator Certification Number;...................
...... ......................
Location of Farm: 2 /z Z S
i
�. ... ........ ... ... T
Latitude ° ` E Longitude �' ` ="
Design
Somme.._. CapacEty`',Populafxon
Currents
Design ' Current ',"Des�g� Curreiht
Capacity Cattle Capacity
, Pqultry
Population': 'Populaiinn .r
an to Feeder
❑ Layer
airy Z Z
der to Finish
FF�
EE ❑ Non- Layer
❑Non-Dairy
row to Wean
a' =
;. ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
n m
rY
Farrow to Finish
F
Total Design Capacity,
❑ Gilts
fi
'
4'�`x Total SSLW
'
❑Boars
u
Number agponsPonds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Wyr..
❑ No
Liquid Waste Management System'
r�
x.
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes 'jaRio
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes:Z�o
❑ Yes No
i
El Yes o
❑ Yes
❑Y ❑No

Facilky umber: q,3 — Z j
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures La oons Eloldin Pons Flush Pits etc.
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
ElYes o
Yes o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ....5+......f ....
..........................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ElYes Pq. o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environnnental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop typeY..!...........................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Cl Yes No
Z""�
El Yes o
......................................
ElYes Zo
❑ Yes (1E �0,
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
25. We ny additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes
No.violations' -6 d6. iciencies, were noted;during this: visit..:You.v'i11 receii:ve,no,ftiriher, :
correspQndekci. about -(his:vWt:• :
0
No
No
`ram ".,
No
N
N
oVNo

tine QCorrivlaint OFollow-unol'D
Facility Number E]��
ection OF
13 Registered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
FarmName: ..........................................................
llow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
-
..........................
County:
U)APiL Aj ................... ............. 11 ........
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No . .......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:..............
MailingAddress: ............................................................................... ..................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite....... ....................... Integrator: ......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator, .................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Design Current :.'Design :Curren1t:.::i�:,,
swine Capacity Population': Poultry' Capactty:..:PopuIation;:­ ic
El Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
C3 Farrow to Finish
0 Gilts
El Boars
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
,'Total Desip
�M
affiffiffifflo
pa.'Ci6'.
j6tal.SSLW
. . ... . . ......
Number of Lauoons HoldihiTonds!!:1 10
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field
X:r 0 No Liquid Waste Management System
is
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
C3 Yes I No
2, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon El Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -aUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
E3 Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes 91,10
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
El Yes WO
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
'01
❑ Yes P No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes �No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
El Yes No
7/25/97
/d
Continued on back

_V
Facility Number: 3-
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
No
r
Structures (Lasoons,I4olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure i Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure G
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ........ 4/....I..............•................................... ... .................. ........,..... .................. .................. ............... .....................
....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[/No
11. Is erosion. or an,, other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
VNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
!!
an immediate public health or environmental threat. notify DWQ)
I3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
040
Waste. Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
�' O
(If in excess of WMP, o7r runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �.a' fV
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
�No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
( No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
W10
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
El Yes
Q"io
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
0 No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
((No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
-WNo
0 No.violations or deficiencies were: noted;during this:visit., You:will receive�no:ftirther;::
correspondence about this'visit::. .....: . , . • ..:. . . .
.1. ,_ I .:�,, ...
�. JJ1,14A) 7t 0
464���
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature,,//If ] Aj (T-A& 11 -L Date:

F� Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
< {OVIvision of Water Quality
,
toutine O Complaint 0 Follo%t,-up of l)li O inspcTtion 0 Follow-up of DS%VC review 0 Other
Facility Number 2 Date of inspection i0
_/ Time of Inspection 3%i-1� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[� Registered ® Certified © Applied for Permit E3Permitted [3 Not O crational Date Last Operated: •
Farm Name: - `' '�^' .. ;-� County: .......................... ... I ...... I. ...........
1 �..............y•..,
...�.�.�'.......................................... (� +
1 l
Owner Namc:.�.1 ...1`�`-iC.1 Phone No �.1 .�`�.. .............................
......................................................................
Facility Contact: .....3ag ..... ... . ......................... Title. ..., Phone No:... ....................
!Mailing Address:................................................11.�. ��..11.���5,r....N�......2�`���. ......t...............................................
OnsiteRepresentative:..-..�xw...... ........................................................ Integrator:....................................................................................
Certified Operator;........, �ti7Q� •1+,,,,., Operator Certification Number
Location of Farm: 1,��-�C V '�l�\ ► _ ` Yw.: C L]`Nv�._
Latitude Longitude
AM Design N� Current
4
Designs , Current h , � Design ; `Currents
Swore Capacity;
Population
`,Poultry
s °
Capacity Population ` Cott Capacity Population
I
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
airy
2
21 pa
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non Layer
yxz
❑ Non Dairy
t
❑Farrow to WeanMM
❑Others=7:
❑ Farrow to Feeder
s
ti
Farrow to Finish
TaWLDesign Capacity
<`
❑ Gilts
❑Boarsq,:Total
SSLW!
.
Number of Lago_ ons I Holdi• ng Ponds
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
❑Spray Field Area
��
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
�, "3 q gf
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Ees
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[9<0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
M4o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
EkMo'
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
.d. Does discharge bypass a lakoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
,_,�
E N�o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
ElC9 Yes
'No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
El1. Yes
,,Q40
N___0
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility in
��
not compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
hrl�o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
U40
7/25/97
Continued v1: back

r
Facility Number:Cj.1 — 2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Ito Iding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): .....-,
10. Is seepage observed from any of die structures?
i
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes VNo
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 6&eXW(V'4'
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses )
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
........... .......... ................
❑ Yes...
IN
❑ Yes
El Yes
lld N
� No
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..C'.CSY'.�.T...... ...........................1!i.,f��...... ............. .............................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities nl
23: Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violitions-or deficiencies.werenotied-during this;visit.- You.will receive' h6 further
Vlo�Q
A
Reviewer/Inspector Name
@ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2'1 TKO
...........................
.......
❑ Yes
I g NNo
❑ Yes
jVNo
❑ Yes
OTo
❑ Yes
52'No
❑ Yes 410
Q
❑ Yes 1dNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 61NO
❑ Yes ❑ No
rc_ —
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Dale: US

Rxquir= I==-4iac At=d=
0t
T-7
N RECOPM
DATE:1995
Owner,. w Fkam Nam=
`� Nh41 $lIC"..
�lCf4%C: Phone.
Cm Site rRq=cnmdvo. Phanc:
Pisysica1 Mdrc*s;
NfuMag Awdress:
Tne OF Swinc PnuitcJ
Dt�sisn Czpcit: Nuirbcr cf Animr % cn Sits:
Lac hudc: _.. � ° ..,.LG�..' _.,_g- -K
Type Cf � al
clrcls Y'�.S or Nc
Dccs the A.,dimid Wnmt= Lag a4:t .: tvc !,1Zia cat 5:cta :ru of : Fact -E- L5 vea 4 hcur st 0 M, avcat
(a crcxi=(� !y I T'cat »- 7 a.^ -es; _ cs r No Actual
cr `ace Itie� �;�cv mare I c :��c mi,.;j caddra5.- tLe ct,.,,r Jagaoas' : ^�;s �ndc.• ck�c
G32ILi.*_.IIS 5C�:ian. .
Was ariyf seepy obsermd �=c` lagcmr(s)? `!ea o bra =vim r�:c.;. cra�tar, u: tk� c:.�?;,Y� � v
IS a&­UG:w 'or
d nraffibla ror land ku ar.? Y;s r va ►s ,hc cnvC; cmF zde;qaat: tX r ,.qa
Fos to T19) 71513i59
sizmju: r n

O� \V A jFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� QL William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
f3 �
Division of Water Quality
nctnher 1 ?00A
Jeffrey Bender
Bender Dairy
Rt 2 Box I I I
Norlina NC 27563
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC930023
Bender Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Warren County
Dear Jeffrey Bender:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on April 3, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jeffrey
Bender, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC930023 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Bender Dairy, located in Warren County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 240 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please lay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc,us NaturallyAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110%a Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Warren County Health Department
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC930023
APS Central Files

Kenneth Schuster
NC DENR
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh N.C. 27699-1628
Mr. Schuster:
Bender Dairy
Jeffrey P. Bender
Rt. 2, Box Ill
Norlina, N.C. 27563
V5 r
This letter is in response to your letter of September 23, 2001 regarding the
inspection conducted by John Hunt on September 12, 2002.
First, your letter refers to our operation as a hog farm. That is incorrect. Our farm is a
dairy farm, as the name would indicate. Please correct your records to that effect.
Before Mr. Hunt conducted the'inspection, I had informed him that I had realized that I
had overlooked the samples I had pulled while applying waste to our corn crop in July of
2002 and was late in sending them in. There was no attempt to circumvent any of the
conditions or regulations. It was simply an oversight that occurred during an extremely
busy time of the year — during the height of the drought while we were irrigating corn
(with fresh water) almost 24 hours a day. Your letter states that the samples were not
being properly collected; I take exception to that characterization. I take the samples
from the waste actually being applied to the field, so my samples are true representations
of what is being applied to the crop. The samples that are in question were not analyzed
during the time frame required by my permit, but were taken during the correct time
frame and were collected properly. I discussed all this in detail with Mr. Hunt during the
inspection..
I have collected and analyzed samples from our operation ever since we put our first
waste holding pond into use over ten years ago — before there were any state regulations
involved, and I have an excellent track record over that time period of having the waste
samples collected and analyzed in the correct time frame. That will continue in the
future. This was a mistake that will not happen again. Furthermore, with the wealth of
previous samples on record, there is little chance of any over -application of waste
because of the general consistency of the sample analyses. I discussed this at length with
Mr. Hunt as well, and he indicated that he understood this and agreed.
On the topic of the vegetative cover on the holding pond, we have sprayed the area in
question with a systemic herbicide to help control the growth of the perennial weeds in
the area and have also mowed the area. We will make another attempt to establish proper

grass cover again this fall after the soil dries out some from the excessive rainfall we have
received in the past week.
The area in question has been a problem since the pond was constructed in 1994. MRCS,
which designed and oversaw construction, left this area with a slope that is too steep to
operate any equipment on. It was also left with no hint of topsoil, so we have been
attempting to establish grass cover on a soil medium consisting almost entirely of subsoil
from deep in the soil profile. This results in a situation in which it is difficult to establish
a cover of grass and is very difficult to control the only vegetation that will thrive in those
conditions — weeds.
There has been, however, no degradation or erosion of the pond dam at all. The weeds,
however unsightly, have served the purpose of controlling any crosion and have actually
protected the dam well.
Our attempts to re-establish a grass cover last fall failed due to the drought that stretched
into this past summer. We will try again this fall — weather permitting -- to establish grass
again.
I hope this addresses your concerns on these matters.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey P. Bender

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April 6, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNCEIPT REQUESTED
.leftery Ben er
Jeff Bender Dairy
Rt 2 Box I I I
Norlina NC 27563
Farm Number: 93 - 23
Dear Jeffery Bender:
A412L'J�
NC
NORTH Cat:
ENVIRONMENT
You are hereby notified that Jeff Bender Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-2I 5.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone]
extension-364 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional'Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Kerr . 0evens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
Jeff Bender
Rt. 2 Box 111
Norlina NC 27563
(919) 257 -1437
Existing Dairy Milk Cows
240.00 head
Waste Storage Structure
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1 �.
i

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
240 head x 32.1 tons waste/head/year = 7704 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
240 head x 69 lbs PAN/head/year = 16560 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2
`i

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
324
3
32B
CS
16
800
0
30
24000
I
April -
May
324
32B
14
ICS
I16
I800
10
15.0
14000
April -
May
324
5
32B
CS
16
800
Q
I
132.0
125600
April -
May
324
6
32B
CS
16
800
0
I
120
116000
April -
May
324
8
32B
CS
16
800
0
4800
I
16.0
April -
May
324
9
32B
CS
16
800
0
T
130.0
124000
April -
May
324
10
32B
CS
16
800
0
I
15.0
14000
April -
May
324
11
32B
CS
16
800
0
6.0
I
14800
April -
May
324
3
32B
2
0
JW
I
1100
130.0
13000
Oct
324
4
32B
2
0
JW
I
1100
15.0
1500
Oct.
324
5
32B
JW
2 1100
0 130.0
13000
I
Oct.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
324
16
13211
JWS
12
1100
10
120.0
12000
324
8
32B
2
0
JW
I
1100
16.0
1600
Oct.
324
9
32B
2
0
JW
I
1100
130.0
13000
Oct.
324
10
32B
2
0
JW
I
1100
15.0
1500
Oct.
324
11
32B
2
0
JW
I
1100
16.0
1600
Oct.
324
8
32B
FHG
0
I
14.8
1180
110.0
11800
MAR-
APR,SEP
END
I
TOTAL1122200
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this Meld is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
CS
CORN SILAGE
50
FHG
FESCUE HAY - GRAZED
TONS
37.5
W
WHEAT
50
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1- 276 122200
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2
TOTAL
A
276
*** BALANCE
122200
-105640 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing -the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
324
10
32B
CS
.40
*1.0
324
324
324
324
324
10
32B
W
.40
*1.0
11
32B
CS
.40
*1.0
11
32B
W
.40
*1.0
3
32B
CS
.40
*1.0
3
32B
W
.40
*1.0
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
4
4
5
5
6
6
8
8
8
9
9
32B
32B
32B
32B
32B
32B
32B
32B
32B
32B
32B
CS
W
W
CS
CS
W
FHG
CS
W
CS
W
.40
.40
.40
.40
.40
.40
.40
.40
.40
.4
.40
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1
0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1..0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 1.80.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct
discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge
of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
5. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

TASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Bender Dairy
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Jeff Bender
(Please print)
Signature:2�Date.
te:
Name of Mane er ( f different from owner)
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson
Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257-
3836
Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St.
Warrenton NC 27589
Signature: Date: d
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization „_„Third Party Receiver Agrreement
I,
generated by
hereby agree to apply waste
in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 16

40
ANK 'RE.- v W
p 1�4
4p A
t,c
V-51 Y,
To 7
vj
NO
JT
qd
wl
-,Wrl

U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
NANF
Interpretative
Grow In a
36B
36C
SOIL MAP INTERPRETATIONS
DATE
Tnter�retnt[nnp nF
Appling sandy loam, 2-67,
Appling sandy loam, 6-10%
S011a
NC-CONS-3 (4/75)
File Code CONS-14
CROPLAND
Deep, well -drained soils which are well suited for most locally
grown crops. Erosion problems are slight to moderate and the
simpler erosion control measures are sufficient to, control eroii.o:
problems. The ability to provide available water for plant use
is medium to high. It is important to return as much humus as
possible to these soils to help control erosion, improve moisture
supplying ability, improve structure and make it easier to get
good stands. For steeper slopes, the erosion hazard is graater.
WOODLAND
Deep, well -drained soils which have few to moderate limitations
for wood crop production. 'These soila have moderately high pro-
ductivity and no severe management problems except the steeper
areas where equipment, operation would be difficult. On these
soiXB, the site index is 90 for yellow poplar, 80 for loblolly
pine and sweetgum, and 70 for short leaf pine. The site index
refers to the hieght in feet that the better trees will grog over
a 50-year period.
PAS T)fRFT.ANi)
Deep, well --drained soils which have few limitations for pasture-
land. Severely eroded areas may require additional effort to
obtain a satisfactory stand. The ability to provide available
water for plant use is medium to high. Estimated annual per
acre yields under a high management level is 9 animal unit mcsuthm
Animal unit months refers to the forage or feed requirement to
maintain one animal unit for a period of thirty days.

U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION Smiu
r rA11 C•.
SOIL MAI' wrl;Rl'RETATIONS
UATl;
NC-CONS-3 (4/75)'
File Code CONS-16
InUerpretative
Grow in s
}
of Soils
32B
Cecil sanely loam, 2-G7
32C
Cecil -sandy loam, 6-10%
32B2::
Ceoil sandy loam, eroded, 2-6%
32C2''
Cecil sandy.loam, eroded
CROPLAND
Deep, well. -drained soils which are well suited for Most locally
Crown crops. Erosion problems arc slighLL to modct•atc acid the
simpler erosion control measures 47.S.c sufficicuL = control cloKor
problems. TA ability to provide available water for plant use Q
medium to high. It is important to return as Much humus as possi-
ble to these soils to help control crouion, improve moisture
supplying ability, improve structure and make it easier to ,get
good stands. For steeper slopes, the erosion hazard is greater.
WOODL M
Deep, well -drained soils which have few to moderate limitations
for wood crop production. These soils have moderately high
pro-ductivity
and no severe managcmcnt problems cnccpt the steeper
areas where equipment operation would be difficult. On these
soils, We site index is 90 for yellow poplar, 30 for loblolly
Pine .qnd swccCuum, and 70 for shorticaf pinc. The site Qdcx
rcicrs to Ulu hc:igIIL in ]CCt LLUU Lhc bcLLcr tree; will grow over
a 50-year - period.
PASTURELAND
Dccp, well -drained soils which have few limitations for pasture-
land. Severely eroded areas may require additional effort to
obtain a satisfactory stand. The ability to provide Available
watcr for plant mse in madium to high. Estimated annual per
acre yields Under a high ManagMCIAL level is 9 animal unit months
Animal unit mouths refers no the forage or feed rcquiremcm to
maintain one animal unit for a period of thirty day;.

lk
-1A TT

17'30" 144 1'45 2 220000 FEET]78' 15'
' 3 6. 2 2' 30"
400
28
u1.5 r ;!
400
ir
tell
-
1l•s32
1 r r
_
11 coo�'�- 4y I J,' 1 '� �,1' <oo
950000
1 f FEET
456
{ I i yyp llr-;�1J,����� �5 ✓% }�� �i''.l \11 �y li,lOP� I ., ; r)��
G� rr
j/
1126
I
.\ I � <• 1 f_—; -'1 `1}^{{/ 11 I �11`.\ .N� I fir �
C o_.,•o
�� ��� f I\ 1'i�� it ��i��'1� •� , \� , \ r L. c r t ., \ r - •4 _: o
` / ' ; } it (1 ' � � ,2 - ! 7 1 l l � - •_.
LOU
4025
l�I
Is
201
l41 � � �` � � ���— � \`l\,• T''/ �I �J ��� _ `tl }I ��h `6 11
�/ � I � 1\1 ><' I , }. �\I'� � l i_ S }, t •srk� �I f ! :} �'. t / � I I
"024
( ,� - `ram 1" � ~,Fa � ��• '1�� Itt' � `�
,/,
r(
- /=,1 :/�:�, _. �; 11 ��. .`l� f�- ll•' f � r �: r �'� i

43-Z3
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
Jeffrey P. Bender
Route 2 Box II IA
Norlina NC 27563
Dear Mr. Bender
AI LT.WYWA
[DEHNF1
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely,
'M-01—
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/beth/animalwaste/tempcertfollowup

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
December 5, 1996
Jeffery Bender
Jeff Bender Dairy
Rt 2 Box 111
Norlina NC 27563
[DEiHNFZ
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Jeff Bender Dairy
Facility ID #: 93-23
Warren County
Dear Mr. Bender,
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.'
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
watA*%9&—46&6fsystem �� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certl}Icatlon Commission An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Jeff Bender
Route 2 Box 111
Norlina, N.C. 27563
Subject:
Dear Mr. Bender:
Q��
�EHNR
Division of Environmental Management
September 26, 1995
Compliance inspection Report
Bender Dairy Farm Operation
Warren County
On September 29, 1995, Mr, Steve Mitchell, from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Mitchell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface
waters of the state, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the
purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed.
Please continue to properly manage the waste and wastewater generated by this farm to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Environmental Management is required to enforce
water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are required to have an approved
animal waste management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical
specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions
regarding your inspection please call Steve Mitchell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Gar t
VbrWater Quality Supervisor
cc: Warren County Health Department
Bruce Perkinson - Warren County Soil.and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett -- Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
RRO and Central Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Reso
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Mr. Jeff Bender
Bender Dairy Operation
Route 2, Box 111
Norlina, NC 27563
Dear Mr. Bender:
F15TA
r1i
E CU so
IDEHNR
July 22, 1994
Subject: Foliowup Visit to
Complaint Investigation
Bender Dairy Operation
State Road 1125
Warren County
on July 22, 1994 Mr. Karl Shaffer of the Raleigh Regional
office met with you at your dairy operation. The purpose of the
visit was to verify the completion of the fencing which was
requested in a previous letter to you dated June 23, 1994.
The evaluation showed that you had completed the fencing as
recommended during the previous visit. This exclusion of your cows
from this small area will greatly minimize the potential for
downslope impacts from the pasture. As discussed and requested in
the previous letter, you are requested to submit that portion of
the waste management plan that discusses the section of the
property over which the concern has been raised.
Mr. Shaffer also noted that the construction on the new lagoon
waste management system had been completed, with the exception of
the concrete work which is scheduled this week. At that time, you
should cease the use of the temporary waste holding ponds and
connect all waste flows to the new system. This will insure that
the current temporary waste management system does not overflow
with resulting discharges of wastewater.
Your cooperation in this matter has been greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact
Mr. Karl Shaffer at [phone].
Sincerely
Timothy L. Donnelly, P.E.
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

-� Mr. Jeff Bender
Page -2-
July 22, 1994
cc: Mr. John Parrish-- Warren County Soil Conservation Service
Mr. Paul Gower- Warren County Health Department
BENDERI.LET

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. _93-23_
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: September 20, 1995
Time:
Farm Name /Owner: Bender Dairy/Jeff Bender
Mailing Address : Route 2 Box 111 Norlina, NC 27563
County: Warren
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Jeff Bender Phone:[phone]
Physical Address / Location : S . R . 1125
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle _XX_
Design Capacity:240 Number of Animals on Site:140
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number:
ACNEW
Latitude: 36' 21' 07".38 Longitude: 78' 16' 10".80 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour
storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes Actual Freeboard: 4_Ft. Was any
seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? No Was any erosion observed? No Is
adequate land available for spray? Yes Is the cover crop adequate? Yes
Crop (s) being utilized: Grasses
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? Yes 200 Feet from Dwellings?
Yes 100 Feet from Wells? Yes
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue
Line? No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes/No
Additional Comments: Facility constructed in summer 994.
Inspector Steve Mitchell Signature -
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

1
United States
� Department of
Agriculture
soil
Conservation
Service
Karl Shaffer
DER, Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Dr., Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
13 3�5 S . Main Street
Warrenton, North Carolina 27589
[phone]
July 27,0994
r_ r/
V,�
J0 ort"
D u j;,94]
RO
This is a reply to your letter concerning runoff from a small area
on Bender Dairy Farm in Warren County, NC. I have visited the site
and approve of Mr. Bender's ammendments to correct any negative
impacts in the small watershed in question.
The .25 area of wooded pasture has been fenced off with electric
fencing, thus providing total livestock exclusion. Natural vegeta-
tion will now be'allowed to fill in this area. The exclusion of
livestock along with the resulting natural cover -will be adequate to
curb any negative environmental impacts that may have been taking
place in this watershed.
If you have any further questions please give me a call.
Sincerely,
John D. Parrish
District Conservationist
cc: Jeff Bender
oo
The Soil Conservation Service
is an agency of the
VlDepartment of Agriculture

Em
'45 2220000 FEET ; y
5�—
.. 11W Ills �1l
I '
.ferIf
4 -
�� tell `
- •yCem--�h � i
.. r
Tower„
�V'`esbury� � a� `�` �' .`'` � � ,�J, it �;� •• '.,�'.
o' ".
7• 498`. - -. "„�__— (IS13 �}f• 1175~ _ - ` /� I ;`�c} �\
t
4 50— ✓ -
G
l�rw64 Way
.•ai. je -•dry;
It
hocc0 U

4CON
W. 1 s'd
z
t
+ 1
G
o- 1�
fix•
a �
t
Own t;
je
VAUGHAN
HILL
�"-L

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office FILE
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
June 23, 1994
Mr. Jeff Bender
Bender Dairy Operation
Route 2, Box 111
Norlina, NC 27563
Subject: Complaint Investigation
Bender Dairy Operation
State Road 1125
Warren County
Dear Mr. Bender:
On June 20, 1994 Mac. Karl Shaffer of the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted an evaluation of your waste management system in
response to a complaint which had been received by this office. The
nature of the complaint was that runoff waters from your pasture
areas were contaminated with waste materials, and negative impacts
to adjoining waters were being caused.
Mr. Shaffer met with you to review the situation. Also present
at the site were Mr. John Parrish and Mr. Larry West of the Soil
Conservation Service. The specific area of concern is along the
western edge of your property, and about 200 to 300 feet north of
State Road 1125. A wooded corner of this tract has slopes which
have promoted runoff across your property line and into a small
watershed which serves an adjacent farm pond. It was recommended to
you and Mr. Parrish that this area be fenced off to remove the
cows. Removing the cows from this area would minimize potential
negative impacts to the small, watershed. You and Mr. Parrish both
agreed that this would be an acceptable approach and one which
should be incorporated into your overall farm and waste management
plan. You had your existing plan on hand for review, and it
appeared to address the remainder of the site and your long term
waste management issues satisfactorily.
You are requested to submit verification that your plan has
been revised to address the specific area discussed above. The plan
amendment must simply state and show that you intend to take
necessary action (in.this case by fencing to remove the cows) to
minimize negative impacts from runoff from your pastures to
downslope surface waters. Please submit the actual plan amendment
with certification from an approved agency or individual to this
office by July 22, 1994. Also please verify that the above items
have been implemented by that date.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Jeff Bender
June 23, 1994
Page -2-
If you have any questions concerning this information, please
contact Mr. Karl Shaffer at [phone].
Sincerely,
TimotAelly, P.E.
ff
Regional Water Quality
Supervisor
cc: Mr. John Parrish- Warren County Soil Conservation Service
Mr. Paul Gower- Warren County Health Department
BENDER.LET

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Jeffrey Bender
Bender Dairy
Rt 2 Box III
NorIina NC 27563
Dear Jeffrey Bender:
1 �11kFW'A ?S-2,3
IT •2
f
ML
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCES
September 24, 1999
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC930023
Bender Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Warren. County
In accordance with your application received on May 20, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jeffrey Bender, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This:_approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Bender Dairy, located in Warren County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 240 cows and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal,penalties, and injunctive
relief. "
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC930023
Bender Dairy
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
WarrenCounty Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural ResourcesVl•ArR rAE Ea
Division of Water Quality cco
ZION
Non-D(THIS FORM MAZY BE PHOTOCOPIED FORscharge Permit USE AS AN ORIGINAL) ication Form' � `� 2 Ig99
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Gpei at><onA
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name:
1.2 Print Land Owner's name:
1.3 Mailing address: Rt 2 Box 11 I
City, State: Norlina NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 257-I437
1.4 County where facility is located: Warren
Zip. 27563
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR I 125 (Tower Rd.) and 3 miles West of US 401
and I mile from Vance County line.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
I.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation. _01 M� 9+ 3 _ / C2— 91
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 93 (county number); 23 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descrii pnCattle operation
airy
2X Certified Design Capacitye%0*qWe-
G1S corrtc"fe
Is the above information correct?. M yes; F-Ino, If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the ma mum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No, of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Typc of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm. No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 1 of 4 93 - 23

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not cove ed by the application
�
system): _ .J�9'tT ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES :*lease circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES lease circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's Iand application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
II
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 93 - 23

Facility Number: 93 - 23
Facility Name: Jeff Bender Dairy
4. �=IFICATION:
w I,
WATER
q RRECEI.VEo
! UAi_1 YSFr..TiON
MAY 2 01999
Non -Discharge permitting
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for 1SG�rtj., U4r r I (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and compl to to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be.Lturned tp me as incomplete. j
Signature
Date y , -)9 / I -
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 3 of 4 93 - 23
(I

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (JAB)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asbeville, NC 28801
Cs2g3 251-6208
Fax [phone]
Avery Macon
Buncombe Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cberokee
Polk
My
ltutberford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Jackson
Yancey
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
(910) 48& 1541
Fax (910) 48"707
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Richmond
Cumberland
Robeson
HMO=
Sampson
Hoke
Scotland
Montgomery
Win lan-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
58; C,'raughto Stroer
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
C33Q 7714600
Fax OIL) 7714631
Alm cc Rockiagham
Allegbany Randolph
Asbe
Stokes
Caswe l
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
For"*
Yadkin
Gnilfard
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
cgs) w-wl
Fax (95.t) 973-3716
Beadort
Jones
Bertie . .
Camden
Lenoir
Cbowaa
Martin
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotsa
Cwrhuck
Aerquimans
Dare
Pia
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washingmn
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Saw
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander Lincoln
Cabanas Mecklenburg
Catawba Rowan
Cleveland Stanly
Gaston Union
Iredell
Raleigh Regional WQ Sq visor
3500 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) 57i-4700
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Diatom
Northampton
Edgwmbe
Orange
Franklin
Parson
Gmaville
Vaooe
'klel AX '
tau
Johnston
Warns
Lae
Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extrasdoo
Wilmington, NC 29405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pmder
Duplin
FORM: AWO-G-E S/2W8 Page 4 of 4

Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
RECEIVEU
WAT+=p OIIAkjTy SECTION
Jeff Bender
Rt. 2 Box Ill
Norlina NC 27553
[phone]
Existing Dairy Milk Cows
240.00 head
Waste Storage Structure
Irrigation
MAY 2 01999
Non -Discharge Permitting
The waste from your animal facility mush. be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
240 head x 32.1 tons waste/head/year = 7704 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
240 head x 69 lbs PAN/head/year = 16560 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
324
3
3213
CS
15
180
0
23.0
4140
I
MAR-JUL
Y
324 4
32B
CS
15
180
0
I
1
14.0
1720
MAR -DULY
324 5
32B
CS
15
180
0
I
I
124.0
14320
MAR -DULY
324 6
32B
CS
15
180
0
x
1
117.0
13060
MAR-JULY
324 8A
32B
CS
15
180
0
li
I
16.0
11080
MAR-JULY
324 9B
32B
CS
15
180
0
I
1
112.0
12160
MAR-JULY
324 10
32B
CS
15
180
0
I
I
14.0
1720
MAR -DULY
324 11
32B
CS
15
180
0
li
I
15.o
1900
MAR-JULY
324 3
32B
SGS
0
I
110
1100
123.0
12300
AUG-
NOV, MAR --MA
324 4
32B
SGS
0
T
�10
�100
14.0
1400
AUG-
NOV,MAR-MA
324 5
32B
SGS
0
I
110
1100
124.0
12400
AUG-
NOV,MAR-MA
324 6
32B
SGS
0
I
110
1100
117.0
11700
AUG-
NOV,MAR-MA
324 18A
132B
ISGS
110
1100
10
16.0
1600
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
` 1
1
II
1
1
1
1
1AUG-
.NOV, MAR - MA
324 9B
32B
SGS
1100
0
I
110
112.0
11200
AUG-
NOV,MAR-MA
324 10
32B
SGS
0
4.0
I
110
1100
1
1400
AUG-
NOV,MAR-MA
324 11
32B
SGS
0
I
110
1100
15.0
1500
AUG-
NOV,KAR-MA
324 8B
32B
FHG
0
I
13.8
+
1142.5
110.0
11425
MAR-
JUNE,AUG-N
324 9A
32B
FHG
0
I
13.8
1142.5
112.0
11710
MAR-
JUNE,AUG-N
324 1
32B
FHG
0
I
13.8
1142.5
16.0
1855
MAR-
JUNE,AUG-N
END
z
TOTAL130590
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina,to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
r
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
CS
CORN SILAGE
T
12
FHG
FESCUE HAY - GRAZED
TONS
37.5
SGS
SMALL GRAIN SILAGE
T
10
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 218 30590
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2
TOTAL
218
i
30590
*** BALANCE 1-154030 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
.acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
I
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
324
1
32B
FHG
0.40
*0.75
324
10
32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
324
10
32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
11
32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
324
11
32B
SGS
0.40
*0.75
324
3
32B
CS
0.40
*0.75
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
324
'A94
324
3 32B SGS 0.40 *0.75
4 32B CS 0.40 *0.75
4 32B SGS 0.40 *0.75
5 32B CS 0.40 *0.75
5 32B SGS 0.40 *0.75
6 32B CS 0.40 *0.75
6 32B SGS 0:.40 *0.75
r
8A 32B CS 0.40 *0.75
8A 32B SGS 0.40 *0.75
8B 32B FHG 0.40 *0.75
9A 32B FHG 0.40 *0.75
9B 32B CS 0.40 *0.75
9B 32B SGS 0.40 *0.75
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
RE UIRED SPECIFICATIONS
/�loT
1. Animal waste shall reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct
discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge
of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or 'available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)'.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a .
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc:, shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Bender Dairy
Owner/Manager Agreement
I.(we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Jeff Bender
(Please print
Signature: Date: T ' c2 - ``►��]
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson
Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257-
3836
Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St.
Warrenton NC 27589
Signature: Date:
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
0
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.'
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 16

- -_ L. i ,• ._� K )fit; 4,�4�t• ,.4..
r •i' rtl•':'•�'iti- 1`� f fir � ���
1, , � fir, .,• .sy-,` _, �,, 'e r.�+S, . j � `t � �1.�� M•�f.�1r y..r
got
214
113 V Clot of
A-'V�111 t
>ti.. :sue `►.w - '' ti:, � �'r": �: `, � t;, �;
`'.. l . Sri � �. �r - ��Y ��---• � t �t . •�;y�� r �+�` r 1 �'�'�;`�'atp •y
F��/ r 3 � - �J •-ti �' i}t � t� Tt�N t -L
• �^ � �. ;r , t •�- •�-. 1. ���• � �'
. � • tic+ f .' I r �� - .w' �.-
;•�`'-2."'T'.. G� J\ �. 4� .r�ti'tJ �.�t�-�.4��Fyy(j.��•t�. �.' �,rr r.+ -'y,t .{��`i
:��,ci-.t ram- +'?%;�• i' .!1,J&k
f.� x' � J : �� ,� ,_1•;s � �t3� � A,• �,1 i �< i- 4-f —�i ' '!S1 � ;r • t. ::;�
TFS
1. fir
.: t Y L 1 { ' . y �!• `,A+ryrF r.! Tr' S '�, +
.r% I � s ` �j'O �`�I�� � ! �t Il•�`r} ;.,� r"" '�`+'=�``"a�,'`t'�•' .`nib. (" A .'<.-�`

I
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PH N NU1"AlBERS
DWQ rq 7
EN-CE-RGENCY \-i:N,VAGE\g T SYSTE\•I '.2) .266 G
SWCD -a - 3
This -plan will be implernenced in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking.
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave vour property to consider that you have a problem. You should make ever: effort to
ensure that this does not happen. Tlvs plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some.,action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to soniclo
possible problems are listcd bew.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include;
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump,
b. Stop irri,ation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to resmi-ting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
a.. Stop recycle pump.
b. .Stop irrif'a(icn pump.
c. ?Make sure no siphon occur_.
d. Stop all IlQ)u; in the house. Ilush or solid separators.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restariinb Pumps.
• E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dis a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fail
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a'professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. .Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters? ,
b. Approximately how much was'released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or properly damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
s. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. Hoag much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a, During normal business hours, call vour DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facifity, the location or
direction of rr.ovemew of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instnict ENIS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - -
. and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
a: Contact the contractor of your choice to begirt repair of problem to minimize off -site
darimee.
a. Contractors ;Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
2 Dc. -mhor lo. 11.'-96

b: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc.)
• a. Name: "2
b. Phone: o- Q
is Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify' the darnaoe. repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening main.
D�c.mi��r 1'•� IL�r;

Dairy Farm Waste, Management Odor =Control Checklist
Cause
DA1Ps to Alinittil"Le odoj- — Site Specific Practices
l ariustea+f
Dairy production
or wooded buffiers
0-' Recommended
FSRecommended best niana6emclit practices
e 'Good judgment and common sense
Pavel Juts or barn alley
Wet nianure-covered surfaces
Scrape or fIusb daily
sufl'aL'es
Gj-�Pronno[e drying with proper ventilation
Routine cl►ecks and maintenance on waterers.
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
13eddctl arcus
- Urine
CI-11'r—unioie drying-witli proper ventilation
• Partial microbial decomposition
Replace writ or nianure-covered bedding
h1aluare dry slacks
Partial microbial decomposition
Provide liquid drainage for stored nialuirc
Slu(ilge Lank or basill
Puniul microbial t1cconiposilion ;
-C1 Butioni or mid -level loading
surt;ice
Mixing While filling ;
Cl Tank covers
• Agitation when emplyillg
0 Basin surface inats of solids;
R--Minitui7e kit runoff and liquid additions
P Agiiatt! only prior to manure removal
0 Proven biological additives or oxirlaws
Scaling ba5ila surfaces Partial microbial decomposition 0 I -Squid drainage From settled solids
• Mixing while filling 0 Remove solids regularly
• Agiiatiwt wlirn emptying
Alata wc. slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading O Soil injection ol'slurry/sludges
spruadcr otldcts Volatile gas Clilissions CI Wash residual manrire front spreader alter use
171 ilrovcii tiinlol;ical additives rir oxi+latiis
tncovcred lilannre, Volatile gas CIIIIssions while n Soil injection ul' slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge uu lichl drying C1 Soil incorporation within -18 hrs
snrl�a t Cl Spread in thin unilnrnl layers Ibr rapid drying
Cl Proven biological additives or cisittclrlis
lur,h i.lnl,s-
Agilatitau OI I-CCyCICd Iat;OOla fl Flush tculk Covers;
liquid while tanks are lillilag n Extend lilt lines ui near h+illuni of tanks with
anii-siphon vents
(7ul,itle dr.lin c011et;tiUia - Agitation during wastewater 177 Box covers
or junction bases Conveyance
• AKIOU - Muvcluhcr 11. 1996, P:agc i

Source Crinse BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lift stations Agitation duriub sump tank O Stimp tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at Agitation during waslewater O Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
LagUlni Stlrf:Ices • Volatile gas emission; _ 1'ro Cmr lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; Correct lagoon stap procedures;
• Agitation C1 Minitttutn surface area -to -volume ratio;
13r—M--inimum agitation when pumping;
C1- Mechanical aeration;
O Proven biological additives
[rriiarinn sprinkler • I lieh pressure agitation; s- Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
'ioczlcs Wind drill Mininium recommended operating procedure;
C-1�utup intake near lagoon liquid surface;;
CI Pomp from second -stage lagoon;
Cif Flush residual manurr: from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge punrpings
Dkad annuals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water around 0 Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water chains
taci1111es0 Microbial decomposition of away from facilitics
organic Mailer
NSu] iracLcd onto pmhlic Poorly waiataiiied access roads I urtn access road inaimienalice .
tuaels linut 1Lrnt aCCCSS
Additinmal hil'urnrition : Available broil :
Calile Manure Managcniew ; 0200 Itule/BMP Packet NCSI1, Comity Extension Lerner
Dairy Educaii(mal Unit Manure lvlanaocment System - fake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory, ; Ef3AE 209-95 NCStI - BA1;
Liwoon I ksign and Management for Livestock Manure "freauuent and Storage ; IMAE 103-93 NCS[ J - 11A I;
N-lanagcownt of Dairy Wastewater ; IMAE 106-83 NCSI l - HAH
(::alihraiiun oI'N'IanurC and Wastewater Application Equipment ; I -BAP haet Sheet NCSIJ - HAI:
Ntiisartce Concerns in Animal Mamire Management: Odors and Mlles ; PRO107. 1995 Confierc rice Proceedings Fl:grid;l Co4)perative lixtensitm
r

Insect Control' Checklist for Animal Operations
Sollrcc Chloe 11MPS to Cant1'ai 111seels- - - Site Specific Pracliccs
Liquid Systems
Flmit Gutters Accumulation of sulids Flush system is designed and uperated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
lYfemove bridging; of accuntttlated solids at
discharge
1-aguolls and fits CruslCd Solids laintain lagoons, settling; basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to ttliltinlize the
crusting of solids to d depth of no more 11tan 6 -
8 inches over more than 30° o of surface.
Excessive Vcg etalivc Decaying; vcg;clation t:lintain vegetative control along !tanks of
f4owth 1 lagoons an([ other impoundments to prevenl
- accumulation of decaying vegetative; matter
along Waler'S Cdg a On illlpollndnlent'S perimeter.
Dry systems
Fccdct :, I'Ccll Spill -age n Design, o1 wrate and timintairt feed systelus (c.g.,
hunkers and trnug;hs) to lniniuticC 111e
aCCItn1111a11u11 of decaying wastage.
(;1 Clean up spillage: nn a routine basis (e.g.. 7 - 10
clay 41LCI-val during; slunluer; 15-30 day inrcrval
during winter),
Deed Stur:eg;e Accumulations of feed residues n RCLILIce nlaislnre ICCtlillI] lilt ian wilhin and
around inulledi:rte perimeter elf t«d slorag;e
areas by insuring; drainage away Drum site
and/or providing; ;Ilieyualc eonlaillttlent (e.g.,
euvered !rill (ur brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain proditcls).
C1 Inspect tier and remove or break up accluoulatcd
solids in filter slrips around feed Slur;Igc as
needed.
AMIC - Pfuvelubcr 11, 1996, Page 1

Sntirce Cause BMPs to Control lastcts Site Strccific Practices
Animal Holding Arcas Accuntrrlalions ofaninial wastes Eliminate low areas that trap moisture alunb
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
ni nimal.
B' Maintain fence rows and filler 'strips around
animal holding areas to minimize .
acctunuJations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up aecttrtutlated solids as
needed).
Dry l.latu►rc I tangling Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Sy�teriis day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
❑ Provide for adequate drainage around mamire
stockpiles.
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
niailLIN handling ;!fells as needed.
For more infunnation contact the Cooperative 1*atettsion Service, Department of Gniomnlooy, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
ANIW- )J......... I i 1 .1 nor . I......

0
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
trial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water. V
�I Rznderino at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
CJ Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
r.l Any method which in the professional opinion' of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
r
1,. EOM'

U. S. Department of Agriculture NC--ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service RECEi%,Sler 1980
WATER QUALITY SECTION
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAM6 2 0 1999
Landowner �T�� �e r £ ✓ _ County _ �!
- Non -Discharge Permi#Gng
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Darn l D �Ft. Length of Flood Pool Z S o Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 3-Z�-`%¢
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Est. Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope:
Land Use Improvements
. Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Pl.ain
Ft. Ft,
Ft. Ft.
.
Gc)Dods:
1 �Doo ' loo
5
---- --�
----
W o 6d
2 ; �1�� �40
' z•�
..
Wativls :-Se )00
3 5o o 2 oo
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from as sudden breach i T��,-�_ �s 17o 4+2-2 And' DA_r lr8/
C�&>Y?a 'f,CIJ 4f��C_
L;� f �M 1t�-i•s r� or„j /j
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, 111, IV, V) Gt S-p CA
By
e
7-7
Date
Concurred By ,(% p Date t �5
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.

INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical assistance from the Soil Conservation Service
must have a hazard classification assigned by the person responsible for
approving the design. Most farm ponds, except in borderline cases, can
be classified after a complete field investigation without assuming failure
and making breach studies. This data sheet is to be used for recording
the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
hazard classification. Where there is a possibility for loss of life or
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult with the area engineer.)
Hazard classifications of dams are made by evaluating the possibility
for loss of life and the extent of damage that would result if the dam
should suddenly breach --that is --a section of the dam be suddenly and
completely washed out. It is to be assumed that a wall of water will be
released equal to'the height of the dam. This flood wave will be reduced
in height as it moves down the flood plain. The wave height (depth of
flooding) should be evaluated for a sufficient distance downstream until
the estimated flood .level will not cause significant -damage to improvements,
such as homes, buildings, roads, utilities, reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
openess of the flood plain; however, in a narrow steep valley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation is to compare available valley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with a judgment estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream. .
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
the area' engineer should be consulted before making lesign commitments.

VICKSBORO QUADRANGLE
4j,`'
NORTH CAROL.INA h3hp�
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) P.
17'30" 1 44 145 2 220000 FEET] 7815'
,I i t�,: ��i� r �= f'� r��;r ; ,�- fr, � � � �rl'_,1' _ �� ���� (i.�� -•-��: `II , r8,-.
r ,' _ r s60 ��, ' � 1`: r! «r'• w — / s `
boo+IJ'I I`
� I - Jam. ., J �, ( .' 3J { -, � n /, •- ! ,
<oo
-
1
+ �028
.o�1�`�:`'l
0 (` ;;\
'-s�u+ 4rf �• j �, �+I �;{ ��lj��\t�`(`t`.t,, `���) � ry _ �; �r i `� �� `�l-;:-'l. - ./'�` y',,I�t�. � ,aol-�
y r _ ; r i,,,. i , 1 $ y- 1 ` ` •-, I! 1 ,ems. _}.')� 1 ( f' -'��'\ _�•� ��\ 457--s -
,} Will 1,
`( f r• / 1(! 1 �%� -�`- � � � � I I� �,-' � \��-�eM:.-/ per. i. � � - {�,
_}1r;� r r +, •,;`;.,1 h}� ... ;�1�-,��; � ' f`-.�' r�`.. .• :11 ��,��. �i�G..��h�_ I _ .f (� r/1� ��`' j� ��' ti
-9 11111ri ' .-� �\ti t1 1 ,i _,` (.� 'Y'�`' / I` -� -
�J� = S I:Jr .�,.c�i. I�i=f�- 1 �rr� `,I; • l ��,�` � r `,) ,',�i� r _.ea -� ,�.. •! I 95�000
400 r- rE r
-_� ••h•''ti`l ` ''� j /_ ` /, `��/�I• 1�1i I i - �I iJ ` ��� \ ti'r lf,r� _r �`.i:�,r _1� I
`- III _ r= ; r- l � �ti_ \ ..-t'-��.�•.. rOwer�
f 1• \ `\ �I ` I1,I �b-;-•a _+ =,- , n I _. l '' f • I 1026
yQ \ // ' aso l
I t\ 1
�- lfp1115
56
0l )N_,
1126 t „' '} �'/ �` i +025
J/ir`� 1 r /?� r�(�}! �L; J �.,I • 1 ` 1 a�J I �+ I 150
•, I ytl. /� t--���� 1 _°l Jfll�'.4 ��``1 ` -`� r/� 1 ` \�` .y Y-`��/ j� ;^ /�, .1 (/ !I' yay- �V I
! : • f _ /' '.- _ I ! y'' . i '111 `•, y } y'k • \\ 1� 1 { �', r �, �I 1129
•;' I i /' - �f, II`+t ' ``••1 �'�� ..�. ) 4I � �)1` �r�jr)� � � .�,;, � \1`''• - k .
- ' ' ` t1 I, pn/C i 4 _ - ,l Y,` ,, 4' N , . '� _ 1��'-y � I` - •l �.f �� � 1 ° `�c5 } �
20'
It-
Ir4024
_ •, �� __-' �. �. . � z-• l�n�."•`I �. � .�� it �l �, r ', ,r \. -
1C!+■pel \ .� 4+ �'17 1, ..`'_1 ,� r -•i j
1:: .�. I � �` .l�`'.'`_- 1 '/l' 1 = l,• `h .c i + ( V
rl I, r
IN
I! •' I I I

DAI RY
WASTE STORAGE POND
Engineering Design Work Sheet` For_ a4 en�er
wa-"p ' County N . G....
DateOesigned on z v cons heifers 6 months storage
Qoo square feet of feedlot ar
(1) Waste Generatpd. �� �aq•
LeLo cows x 1.4.:T+cu. . cow/day. . x. 18D s dayZ o cu, ft.
heifers.z ht4 Cu. ft./heifer/day x days* Cu. ft.
(2) Nash Water:
3,5 A_gai s. /daylcow x _cows x I80_days- p Ibo Cu. ft..
7.5 gals./cu. ft.
(3)
Lot Run-off: (Nov -April)
j$ /12" x R-Q+DOs2 sq. ft.
! Doo cu:
ft.
(4)
Exc ess Rainfall on Waste Storage Pond
!Do Lx Zsa'Wa ?.soo osq. ft. x
j3,S4 Z- cu
.
ft,.
(5)
25 Year Storm on'waste Storage Pond
x Zs. 000 sq. ft.=
.3333 cu.
ft.
(6)
25 Year Storm on Feedlot
6k /12" x tb,obo sq. ft.=
-S333 cu..
ft.
(7)
OtE�er (�thsie undlV�. Druinq3e �)
TOTAL: 154 (Opa cu. ft.
* Runoffs 36" / year; lb" / 6 month's
rr * n u _ r
See Ex Raul q, Rainfu� i eSS
Table
Volume- death [(aria at top) +• (area of bottom) +• (4 x area midsection)]n
-....Cubic Feet -
1 0 a' x Z S O�
�s)C�4s) t C4��(r�p +9 47,$)[�l7.$)
L/I E_2-3.775 •- 76,00 f .S•8 725]
A -ram- 4q-

SCS-ING-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rev. 5.70 SOIL CONSERVA]ION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME DISTRICT 49 2d V,-e _
DATE . I -A —9!9 — COUNTY Y Me r~
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT - w 2ir.rC_n
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS LC1 eS
CROPLAND —ACRES PASTURE ACRES (I 455 E - -YQ �� �� , "r
WOODLAND ACHES TOTAL —ACRES POND CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIu.�IST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SIiOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. III I"� �� feet)
Llxaa rfferince arrinf in center fine of dam and ld"AlY on sherch.
J
50'
I I i
I
p
s
�
f
SHOW
L)E.P'i'li
SCALE
BORING NUNLkiE:R AND PROE'IL.E:
Made ,1 d II dsm me and Jolflway born,#J first - then Jwnded a,f and hamiw ylt hnnnus . Jecwrate With uerni cf re, lint.
%C_JnIIiy 'j ran bart WhfM nree Jary) SAOW Witte, fable elfWn'"J an damLs+fe M1OnrlpJ,
1
5
—
�4
I
l9
0
Cll
L
o,
-
-
—
a
--- —
--
5.jQ
-
_
I
�.
do
(Lib,
�xt
/1lo
i
I
i
--
LA--
—
--
W tS� � ICE I }fD r . Pay Ithln.
110HINVS MADE; 1IY SIGNAIAIRE &

.TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
Giir -Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
GP - Poorly graded gravels
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
g- gravel
5 - sand
vfs-very fine sand
sl - sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand-gr#vel mix
fsl-fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands
l - loam
SM - Silty sand
gl-gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si-silt
ML - Silts; silty, v. Fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sit -silt loam
CL- Clays of low to medium plasticity
cl-clay loam
CH- inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl-silty clay loam
MIl -Elastic silts
scl -sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH - Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c -clay
1. Suitable material for ecabaakment is •vailabla [ I it I as O No (indicate wh.r4 lowivv an 14% aktich on
rover WO
REMARKS: —'Er S M G a'� 40 f 4-)"A. jj u:
rmhgnle x -,,J Aax i rr,,J fo e rD kI
U l I 1 rv-�. > c.." wu a // 1 'eVdj n4. X'�" o,• �,ls ~ RA �-A f � �yc , :: y .k .40e n/C- ---IP.yts R 'cn /a r'y r- 4_0
_" rrta ct h4+ -� o+-o /�1 fd ✓! q +�wrw !r 67 p ,-n l rc fi
2 Explai bazurds ru(juiring special attention in design Isew~s, snr+,y,,.mck .u-)
t1 P 2 C&,Lf- a as r c, x �,0 C Q
-- f Y D jgo 7- St ltioP d f
�drrt-'o P, Y ,d?C_ I
No si9^ 4' dni .xoe�os
GENERAL REMARKS:--
livr.nf
�h�...�� Pi►,�ng xee�_d .
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
3ii
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
tS
49
50
51

-�`�-
5 3 3 3 44-
Tr7 a q �'+. �ep"_
f D6 �9���Z¢�� + �9o•s yn .s�t 9�y'z.�sJ�z�z,75J
--tCZ3zS t ��76s t 5',l
6 ,
C13 5ia
'33. o
9
S�� to Qu wp

CEMAL
These spaclficatians are to be made a part of detailed engineering plans of the pro-
posed embarraenc, spillw ay(s). and reservoir.
No changes nor deviations from these plans and specifications shall be allowed without r
written amendment, in advance of change, from the responsible technician of the Soil Conser-
vation Service.
All facilities for impounding water shall comply strictly with all scats and local lava
regulating such activity.
The Soil Conservation Service makes no warranty, expressed or implied, of the impounding
structure or the water holding ability of the structure.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF;
A. Landowners
The landowner will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications
to determine that the completed structure will fulfill his present and future needs. Inspection
during construction will be the responsibility of the landowner,
He may request Inspection by SCS employees during construction and upon completion of work.
Where benefits are to be received from Government agencies, or when the dam falls under the
Dam Safec,, Law of 1961, inspection and approval by SCS employees are mandatory.
8. Contractor,:
d
The concractor will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications,
conditions at the site chat may affect nis schedule of operacion, and the location and meaning
of all stakes on the site. Failure to do so will not relieve him of the difficulties and coat
pursuant co satisfactorily, completing the work in compliance with these plans and specifications
and any written or ver'oal contract with the landowner. Ali bench marks, grade, and line stakes
Will be Lcee undisturbed And protected by the contractor co facilitate construction acid in -
The contractor. weather permitting, will schedule his work ao chat he will start on the
agree,i date and work will be a continuous operation until satisfactorily completed. All
damage! occurring eo completed work or materials, by the elements or otherwise, during can-
scruction, will be the responsibility of the contractor. Partial or damaged work and/or re-
placed maceriAls ddm;.ged from any cruse will ba paid for by the contractor. AbaLnce of in-
spections during construction will not relieve the contractor from completing the work in
strict compliance witti these plans and specifications.
Upon completion of the work, before moving his equipment, the concractor will request a
final inipiccian by ch+ landowner And an employaa of the SCS. The contractor will then receive
Approval chat all work had been completed satisfactorily and/or he m:.y complete those teams chat
vary from the plans and specifications in order that a [Inal inspection w_ll result in Approval.
C. U. S. 'Jeuarcment of .ierieulture - Soil Conservdtion Service:
The L'n:tea States �r,d 1cs employees are in no uw nncr A party to any verbal or written
contract hcudcan•ehe landowner and the contractor. SCS employcoa, within limit of personnel
available, will inspect and advise on techniques during construction to assure satisfactory
compliance with the plans and specifications.
SCS employees will, upon reasonable notice, conduct a final inspection far strict compli-
ance with all plans and specifications concerning this structure. Inspection will determine
the sacistzccory completion of work so chat (a) approval may be given for the eliaibiliry ai
the lando-wner co receive benefits from any Government agency cuncerned with this structure,
(b) final payment may be made to the concractor, and (c) the pool may be filled under the
provisions at the Dim Safety Lev of 067.
-2-

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS CrR HOLDING PONDS
Clearing: Ail trees and brush shall be removed frcam the construction area
before any excavatin3 r..r f i I I is started. Stumps wiII be rein-yed within
the area of the foundation of the embankment and alI excavated areas. All
stumps and roots exceeding one (1) inch in diameter shaiI be removed to a
minimum depth of Acre (1) foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of
a I I debris. The foundation area shaiI be loosened thoroughly and roughly
leveled, with suitable equipment, before placement of any embankment
rnater i a I .
Cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated as shown or, the plans.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE AFPRCXIMATE. EXACT DIMENSICiNS WILL GE DETERMINED BY
SCS PERSONNEL WHEN THE SITE IS OPENED UP DURING CONSTRUCTION. The cutoff
trench shall be backfilled ire thin layers, not to e::ceed eight (S) inches
depth. All standing water shall be removed from the trench before
backfillin3 is started.
Construction: Construction will consist of excavation tt- the neat IInes
arrd grades as pIawned. In areas of the lagoon bottom and side slopes where
pervious material is encountered, the area shall be overe:;cavated by 15
feet and_backf i I I ed wi th c I_ayey rnater- i al . Excavat i or, steal I be by parr,
drag Iine arid/or backhoe. A bulldozer- or other equipment will be used to
dress the slopes. FiII material placed in the embankment shaiI be free of
sod, roots, stones over c. i riches in d i ameter, and other object i onat, I e
rnater i a l s. The f i l l rnater i al sha I I be p I aced arid spread -,ver the errt i re
fill area in layers riot to exceed 8 inches in thickness. Construction cif
the fill shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content
of the fill material will permit a reasiinab l e de3ree of compac t i ore.
Corn p action of a I I fill material shall be accomplished with a sheep -foot
rc.IIer Fussing several tunes over- the entire surface of each * inch lift.
To rutect a• ainst Ieaka3e, the entire Ia3oon bott«rn and all e;:cavated side
slopes shall be compacted i n the sarne manner, as the •f i I I rnater- i s l_
cornpact i on.^
The primary borrow area will be within the basin itself. Any other areas
will be desi3rrated on the plans.
Vegetation: ArI exposed embankment, spillway, and borrow areas shall be
seeded to. the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIO14S
r &A
e L _a..d c u Ica den-ia� slki l l b� ajAZ C& 5i s pe . _.
%Ln% l"e,St 4 rrac% . TO
.}1101.*-
�i llo r..+, f•8 n d ddr �+a n � �
10 �a `Far S&'�'�'IGMe►+�.
Cut Core Where Fill Exceeds 3'
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION

WASTE STORAGE F'i FND
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
The 5tor'a3e pond is c.—Ifnp used of two vo I urn es. The lower- _Ip'j— fret of deptl,
in the pond is trio waste stcarage volume. The refna i n i n-3 depth, i' tr,e pcond
to the e;ner-ger,cy sp i I Iway I eve I i s sto, -a3e f.:.r- a '25' year, :`4 hout- r-a i nfa I I
that enters the pc,nd. The e I evat i r,r, to start puinp i n,3 i s '3 -end wi I I i--e
markeo with a permanent rnark:er. In :,rder to mair,toin mc,i f,i,s st4",ra_ir;,
tr,e p-:,r,d will need to:, be pumped. -out completely.
The waste .ut i I i :.at i or+ F, i ar, shall toe fc- I I r: wed as shown i n Attachment A.
Th i s requ i r-es saif,p I e5 and. test i n3 of waste ( see Attac hinent B) t,r_ 1'or-e I and
app I i cat i c.r, . Witstti s1,a I I toe a p p I i ed ran f i e I ds as sh,c,wn or, attached sc, i I s
maps.
A fence wi I I be cvnstr-ucted to rot -event I ivestock: frc,rn walF;ir,tj .".n the darn,
th,erefor'e, prevPntin,3 a hazard fc-r th,e I ivestr.,ck; and carnage to i-he -lam
The u t i r,e rna i ntenaroc e co th i s waste stvt-a9e p+.r,d i nv,:, I ves ti-,e fc, I I ..ow i r,,:1:
1. Mai ritenance cif a vegetative cover- or, the embank;ifipr,t and iri the ernes•-
gei-lcy sp i I I way: Fescue is toe i ng estab I i shed or, these areas. ' Ue3 i r,-
n i n•3 the year after- c,_,nstr-uc t i c+n and each year- ther-eafter-, the
ernciankme-rot and ernes 9 e n c y sF. i 1 Iway s.h-:.0 I d toe fer-t i I i z e s wi tr, I
r,c,und5 Of der' acre try maintain a vi,3oi,1.ou5 stand.
�. Cor,tt-o I c f weeds, torush, and trees cir, the emt. ani::meat and i n tr,e
emergency Sp I Iway: this s h a I I tie d-3ne try ,n,:iwifojj, spt-ayir,;j, :r
ch0 fir' i f,g, tor- a comb i riat i .:on of a I I three. This w i I i nee-i to be
done at ieast :.rice each year- and possibly twice or, year,,.; f vc.ra.Gle
to heavy 9r--:.wtr, cif ve9etat i _>ns. You may check; w i tr, the I oc:.i I
E:,tens i �_.r, A,y- ency 'ot- SC"S off ice fo:,r- the I atest i ri# or-ffiat i c,r, or, spray
ma -ter- i a l an J tf",e t+est t l me t c. a p p 1 y thefn.
Pia i nten;xnc e i nspec t i C,nS of th 15 waste storage Foono sriou I d be fnaoe our, i ng
the i n i t i al f i I I i ng, at least annual l y, and of ter- every ma,jot- C i-0r-fn. I tE=.fns
t-:, toe checked s h o u i d include, as a fninimum , tI,e f+,I I.}win3:
I . Emergency Sp i I Iway
a. eras i con -
to. s e d i rnentat i can
c . weeds, srna I I trees, I :,gs, fences, c. t- ..thec c.bstr-uct i c,n that
reduce c hanne I capacity or may f 1 c-w.
2. Embank:ment
a. sett I errient, crack: i rig or ",jug" h o I es
b. s i de s l ope stab i I i ty-s I urnps ot- bui ges
c . er-cos i cori
d. r-�:ident ,carnage
e. seepage ot- cotrier• leakage
f. cond i t i -Dr, and type of vegetation cijver-

Con �GT- SGS
d 4- o Se�diaS 9'0 l4p-A+ rr e ciL .ft! ar /%I /x7t yr e - 4&e .,
AREA TO BE SEEDED: AS ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
LTC) LBS. FESCUE GRASS a 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
Q O LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS a 60 LBS./ACRE Z
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
I Z LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS a B LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL I TO JULY 31
4S LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
0 LBS..RYE GRASS a 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER I TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
) SO b LBS. OF 10--10-1 O FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
TONS'OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
SO BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 HALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
2. 4D 16s/.ac- o le ie-
^)x AV • a hGrrac S �

S L 9 {-r --
°]°L• r'
5,8 0 L7
+
/h / 0 /
•rl �)
/ LoS
"P S L 9 t7 rw v // bon d7kG-7 d 5-C17

J
COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
STATE PROJECT
r rG h OA.0 , /U ' L. je
BY ` DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO.
SUBJECT XCA v,.Q Tlo / i - (.,) S SUEET_OF
1v ZoaF
END AREA
STATION
gQ IN.
END AREA
.
SQFT.
SUM OF
END AREAS
SQ. FT.
DISTANCE SECTION VOLUME
IN FEET PRODUCTS
CU. FT. CU. YO ,
REMARKS
Otvo
0• Oo
�- 60
f
•
78o
Zo
l5�00
2.o
/• 0
380
3C?/60
67
-sue
33?oo
X �Zo
•y6
Zq2
L a
Z Z 5zo
-6 o
Z•
5S
s�
�
p
D
//y
3a
za
X� o
o s�
I
rZzB '
& o
&�'o
�p
o•
li
14-c�
D
vS7-d
-
3 a
f
/ _
ZzoE
p
O
m
/Z-
- y�
cy
7 tl p
2c5
r{ o
Z o S
%' • 9r
o
olS,�
0.70
4c
Y-V. 14's
o0
�17S
x b �4o
la;
71; z
p
6�s �•y�

COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
STAT PROJECT rr,A
BY JDATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO.
_g
. ' SUBJECT �'A� r/,i SHEET OF
STATION
END AREA END AREA
SQ �N. SQ.
5UM OE
END AREAS
So. FT.
DISTANCE
IN FEEL
SECTION VOLUME
PRODUCTS
CU. FT. Cu. YD.
REMARKS
(F �!
- 1 ofi5
9 -Z2
l y
o ss
•So
/a o
.z
Yr31 S
3 zo
S
Zn
D
-V 035
6
� l�
5 o
f•, r o [�
-S' 6s
1• 4 G
3 Z
72-
sv
Y
/•27
-5
y o
'� ,• a
.z n
l � � �' 7
g :!a
2.30Ll
o
,( .
3l6S
/"13
5
2z � n
3V O
�.' , 4'
A
V 0—
y
So
77.00
.SACS
r
i

OH-IRM 2/15/88
US Department of Agricultur6
Soil Conservation Service
PLANNED
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
.3 E F F E3 E P41E) I Z
in
WARREN County, North Carolina
Designer
: FRANK
EVANS
Checker
--_. •_,____--__--
Date
: 04/12/91
Date
Job
Number 056
•#���at••�a+•��r-�*•�a*�-��•��-�a��-��-mar-a�-•�x-�-�-��r•��•�•�•-���-�•n•�-�-�-�•�-K-��-K--��•�-���c-���-��•�*�-���*�-****a�ia��aE•
WSP
EXCAVATION
f ** EXCAVATION*
* FILL
**
Dot
Left
Right
Off -CL
1
CL
Dist
Area
Volume
Area
Volume
;idth
SS
SS
(ft)
Sta
(ft)
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
(SgFt)
(Cu.Yds)
40
2.5:1
2.5:1
40.0
18+.5
662.2
0.0
f
12
1
280.8
0.0
40
2.5:1
2:5:1
40.0
0+30
1 656.2
0.0
20
768.6
0.0
40
2.5:1
2.5:1
40.0
0+50
1 661.1
0.0
50
1956.8
0.0
40
2.5:1
2.5:1
40.0
1+00
1 622.2
0.0
50
3034.7
0.0
40
2.5:1
2.5:1
40.0
1+50
1 542.0
0.0
50
4060.8
0.0
40
2.5:1
2.5:1
40.0
2+00
566.1
0.0
20
4476.0
0.0
40
2.5:1
2.5:1
40.0
2+20
555.1
0.0
l
5
f
4560.0
0.0
40
2.5:1
2.5:1
40.0
2+25
352.1
0.0

OH-IRM 2/15/88
US Department of Agriculture
Sail Conservation Service
CROSS --SECTION DATA
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
EFJ= 13EJNJI13EFZ
in
WARREN County, North Carolina
Designer : FRANK EVANS
Checker _______________
Date : 04/12/93
Date ---------------
Job Number 056
WSP
EXCAVATION
TEMPLATE DATA: -
Beginning Elevation = 82
Beginning Station = 18+.5
18+.5 to +30
C\2.5CL40/2.5
0.00000
ft/ft
+30 to +50
C\2.5CL40/2.5
0.00000
ft/ft
+50 to 1+00
C\2.5CL40/2.5
0.00000
ft/ft
1+00 to 1+50
C\2.5CL40/2.5
0.00000
ft/ft
1+50 to 2+00
C\2.5CL40/2.5
0.00000
ft/ft
2+00 to 2+20
C\2.5CL40/2.5
0.00000
ft/ft
2+20 to 2+25
C\2.5CL40/2.5
0.00000
ft/ft
SECTION NUMBER 1
Centerline Station 18+.5
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 95.4 40.0 / 91.6
110.0 / 92.0
120.0 / 92.0.
150.0 / 83.3
SECTION NUMBER 2
Centerline Station +30
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 94.9 40.0 1 91.6 110.0 1 92.0 120.0 / 92.0 150.0 / B3.3
SECTION NUMBER 3
Centerline Station +50
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 94.9 40.0 ! 91.6 115.0 / 92.2 125.0 / 92.2 140.0 ! 83.1
SECTION NUMBER 4
Centerl i ne G-Fati tiro 1+V►RI

�• r
-JSP EXCAVATION (continued) 04/12/93
page 2
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 f 93.8 40.0 ! 91.7 115.0 / 91.0 125.0 ! 91.6 145.0 ! e2.9
I-ECTION NUMBER J
Centerline Station 1+50
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 9.3.3 40.0 f 90.4 115.0 / 90.8 125.0 f 90.8 140.0 ! 33.2
E.CTION NUMBER b
Centerline Station 2+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 92.0 50.0 J 90.9 100.0 / 90.9 110.0 / 90.9 140.0 / B0.9
4ECTION NUMBER 7
Centerline Station 2+20
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 91.0 50.0 / 90.9 100.0 / 90.9 110.0 ! 90.9 135.0 / 82.0
SECTION NUMBER 8
Centerline Station 2+25
ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 91.0 50.0 ! BB.O 100.0 1 E38.0 110.0 / BB.O 135.0 / 82.0

tV"oe 0
��4 . V
2—
X�3 4 --- ---
......... ------- -

r
i
I
Et C✓. 4h
t[ e tl-.270
oM
r E(I, 8Z o
i
..._._.--.._.__. ____._.. _...._ .,�_ .. . .. ... ...
.._
oo
PUSH d FF i4R40
mIILWIM
PAR�o�oOL
. .
NPED, 16
FaR
;
DETA/z-s
'
�bTt Pr�tY
WSJ DETq«S
W AR46A) evvNry, N_c .
U. S. DEPARnSEA"T OF AGRICULTL]RE .
SOIL CONSERVA71ON SERVICE
e..-.......... � •
�--�-=ter .
:—
_ __.

. 3� l ?13Lf�/yj 3LSE�� ?l QJ
..
g3.L6�3�.L 3�nSs�d
�w{��a wnLv�N1L�1
- . L+tn Fcl � b Ltit
_._
/S�
aalaa91-
qin ssg"�j 8x�:
�vnU1[Ntl�,f
?aRljo
p

CT
ANTRAL MASTS MANAG—MM.:7T PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR F.ZISTING FEEDLOTS MYq t
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at
the address on the reverse aide of this Form,
Name of farm (P1 ase print).: 02ff-
° Mailing Address: T
MIRLZMA u•G_ �Za2_3 Phone AW/j)_Le7-/q.57
. y
o County (f farm) • I�
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude j6_ jj'O ~ / ,��Q"(required) Also,
please attach. a copy of a county road map with cation identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy etc.) :_rL4jCAV
Design capacity (number of animals):
Average size -of operation (12 month population avg.) O
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): —I/O
�aoao�a��a a�aaaxa�emaaasaaa��an3aaanaaaaaaa=a�ggaa�aaasaaaaaaaa�a�c^,a.-aaa�as�o
Technical specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the
existing animal waste managl--ment system for the farm named above has an animal
waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation
Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been verified
by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as
applicable: minimum separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land
for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper
waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
stormwater runoff events less severe than the 2S-year, 2�hour storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) /�"] ��/�Ql►�,
Affiliation (Agency) _W8?�� 6tt1&_e7
Addre
one No
Signature &U� ( YAAL=.a� _ _ Date' ,-<.,r_,■,2o -S� - - - - -- -
aa��aaaaaaaap5aaaaaaasa�q�da�aaoaa��a��aa�aa�aaaaaa��a� :p ��a :aaavaa aaa
Owner/Xanager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any•expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runoff from a
storm event less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District. p
Name of Land _Q�me.V, (Please Prinpq) : ��L �Qi ` ZeAd1pr
r
Signature:— - - Date: - a0-9'Ir
Name of Mand4e$; if different from owner (Please print):
Signature:
Date:
NQte:•A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY: ACE#
13-93

r"pjom
049j
oaS 'SiDMOHH Uo4saic!
®6 �Uawa� J0wano�uo
"jr ,4UnH Wouol'
ouQ`- awo
ON a 1D4uawUOjl411 10 U r
!
pCl r' orS IC
tk I- y
i�` '� �r LLLI y ? to rs 3 � E • .1.7it .. �� �f'Ci ..;�-.K.. as
1
IF y 17 s Ir . ii!?!
UIA
1? !lJ! IM um.] `, .4 M/0mn Pick. 11li 1 h
-
rtS
I1J 7 6 t. .e li.L! Lull. ti: fy I
7 Cii17 122! la3 A 5cdy..•7 � Ar � � 7y � i�
� 1r ? NORIWA '�' i .♦ I.b � 71
aS rr ' a ,�.,5 �Sy JJ.SL ror v0I cro t . isr Lmn , ru , /
rlot Isr n LM i AIACON
Ilal
1 r.r C, >ie �• •117. •
Isr r1 � iilI
.. see �"`O1er
1 1Lr3 7 G�a� 1} 1- i 1]r 1771 Ia `1 A 5 cr. wam"r
AO
ILL
/ w IA —� • f ,' 7� +<>� WARREWON x •liCZ .� t.7 'ye.'t,
ror. 00e
1! �� rl• :`SFr, '' V .r �
e lrlr •.R.`, tr ��•
e`� G • LLl! 11-1 IF,* 112.A
se -4 112A tA s►s '� yoa. - 3' sa
I o� o
r ITS
.° 401 .9 i
NS
C
1116
ras' 1QQ.l IJ t�}'1.f-
W, Lis9
r 1. b. o pax IC I' b I to;
1 BKdle Gr
G 9 ~ liberi0
s I.a Y 11.L L11]
t•llli 11i1 )� N !rs R as C'bp4
]d.L70. ` 176 1 Ili i •ANOn Cr�r• y Mam10du4• ro �s
4 -
r.
-•I .10— .r t` rial -0r •^' S r.7 Iso' sr �.LLU
ap.
Lou
1127 i S 11)) ? r� ` 1611 BSI ' M-1
r a LLU ` 71
Jie �4. J LIM- r -4 . r 'IV Llul LPS,J
lVKlueor0 S� �y EIb•ro1 Parktown � .?
1133 d S
J1i n \ ♦ ral] 7.6 �
a,Q 141d LW rOrKh Cn•4
SIiI ,Jill 7 y
QI. 61
j0
J7. .S
e �e� 1.7
1
�o .?
.s LL]4 1•t
1-47-7." Lei£
n
7a
L}� 1c
.s16170 1l13
T,ULI
`Y
9L
-
I I!a � b � •. �O
r�
a Le]Q
II=O K 1194
1 I.a
iii 7,0
M
u-,1
�'
197P Irwr ! � !
'
a
1 U.i
sty I 617
1�p Iickakillal
n
+
G
r� `^
J
�
Lil[ie k
10
36, I S' SAarc0
/
r
3
14)7
+
I4t,
o r •
'Y
I6,r
^
�4
�.
sh_Z.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Aiwvk4.�'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Jeffrey Bender
Bender Dairy
Rt 2 Box 111
Norlina NC 27563
Subject: Fertilizer Application'Recordkeeping-~ ,
Animal Waste Management Systetn'' 'C
Facility Number'93=23
W,arren,County
Dear Jeffrey Bender:
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10% post -consumer paper

� J
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
<`} Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
[] Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
�] Other Agency - Operation Review
j2Routine Q Complaint Q Follon'-ueor DN'.'Q inspection Q i ollo„-up of D511'C rcricw Q Other
Facility Numb elu����y���.•r.»......:»G....•.,»��.,W..»m_ w� ]l.lfe of Inspection 7:�y
'Time of Inspectiol 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ❑ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered j] Not t} 3erutionaI Date Last Operated: .......................
Farin Name: /?%I�i F— �t� �� ('aunt~':... /t IL ......................
OwnerName: ............................. Phone No: .......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ....................... .....Vide:......................... Phone No:
A-lailing Address:
Onsite Representative:.... r ..........1• /v1�..Lt/f ................................... Inter.;ralor:........................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
�I
.......... ............................... ......................................... .................. .......................... .......... .............. ................................................... ............................ ............ .............. ..,.........
I �
Latitude �» �' ' Longitude • �� ��°
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current. Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver 19 Dairy
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of LagoonsI Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JCI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste A-lanagentent System
Discharges & Stream IrnIMC s
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If ycs, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Othcr
a, If discharge is observed, was the core c:yance ratan -made''
h. 11' discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. Ifdischar«4 is ohserved. what is the estimalec{ llo%v in �allinin'.'
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon systcrn :'
2. Is there evidence ol' past discharge from any part of the operation'.' („rrpuTSTV 4:049 EC
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a dischargc?
hVaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
�`
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes f1io
❑ Yes Z�No
'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes,,Z No
❑ Yes dN0
SIr'UtltUre I Structure 2 Structur; 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier;
Frechc,:rrd (inches): L............................................................................................................................................................
......................................... .
1/6/99 Continued on back

Fay'.;ty Number: — Date of Inspection <
5.' Are there any inuttcdiale threats to the inwc 'rily of, any of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, Yes �No
seepaC e(c.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not Properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or �J
closure plan'? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an I
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement' Yes ❑ No
8. Does any pact of the waste management systern other- than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (�No
f 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top odike, maximum and minimum /
liquid level elevation markings? x Iv+L_t f`t X /l'I►git-�Cr`� i,t�,Lp T �t!►R aFF M."Ll L R( Yes ❑ No
5 7_44T P On PIN&-
1V<ste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvemenl'? ❑ Yes ZNo
11.
Is there evidence of over application" ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
❑ Yes
❑ No
12,
Crop type ....C.
13.
Do [lie receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
El Yes
2NO
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (foo(print)
❑ Yes
�ffNo
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
6No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
1No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate ol'Covtue & General Permit readily available?
't P kIrm
❑ Yes
2/No
'N a 1 `� ti r i—(
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
PTINo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
Z No
20.
Is Facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in efTect at the time of'design?
❑ Yes
ZNo
21.
Did the Facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible char,,c?
❑ Yes
tVo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
P1110
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
24.
Does facility require a Follow-up visit by same agency? Lac �>/� �t Xr # �^
Yes�11*
0, Ndviolations:ot: deilciencies .were nosed. du.rinig ffitis;visit.1'oti vi i)l.rekci.eive no t irtlier .:.:
...
corrtrsptHitdeht e:iihbut;this visit.. ........ .. .. .. .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
/ R r 4w_ 0 4) �_` /uoc__�5 ✓J 5 i_0 /5 11/rf /51`r r
uAu 13'AIZ6- 5/'ei 5 C 5ry , •vG- F�c� /_7 5
T`i io llc ��fr.cF G-re'u�u��
a„ '5 I4- r~ d, m H N U12- C �►L�.a i CU t C� MP - C/t/ ly,41 " 1 e L 5 h a C:. L 1J 1-11 f~�i J
q1L r 14/- t �.5 j V j ,9 �_L 4-0 C C C All} Un�r? c-12 �Z �� r L. U �i� �` ri11 t--4 LS r -
' S c LE�L P� /�� / r'o•'� Y 5 �� ; �„� rF l Ic >Zr� e �� r~ /�'� s X r G 15
A rn a pt= c, , � S i-0 P r- r. 4 4A) D O L _ 4,14;7 1�,un Tf�h,U 4N G.C�i�SSt
Reviewer/inspector Name 11-&" LT u 42t..V[_ i4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tP,1 4, 4 , Date: Z7 dj cJ
1 /6/99

TO

.T • I
Safety Rajl
C,"I-ggom, �M�naRlur}� Se-4- 9ei�X4- 4 Fit Cgugo.t*ca'�
G" 2- Be.ann Sa" ROL; [ Support
P65+ Set in Concratv,
i Lir Th;CK Fiber Mesh Concrete,
Sly Pad a M+ni rnun of .iol Wd.
' concrete 5lurnp : V,
"L+ ,/ l,/1 Slop
W.
p I `}f
J5 C/r7t�rC�d eprfYGYG4G
fA ►.
•��Vf1io� ::i�_..�._ Sec.
I6 fon9 * 4 Re-bcar,dr+yen
15" deep ;rr}o the Cut Slope
RC-bprb On w Ccrrte,rs
q
�� �1�E✓. $ 2. O
Bomm of WSP1
i
(�VIF-W- CONCRETE SLIP PAD
L,X6.. /e00 W,--)Jed Were ra6rrc �
S" Ccnic✓ a -P SJa 6 .2. 0, G'ci,�cr
4r. 1Currrb. Min_' 6" Q�lap
Owe
urc d ro S¢►-a pC-
WOTE To, prevent problems ;n moving
The, Dotry vjosm dow#S "c 51;p Pad. .
The pod SHOULD NOT be Con5trucTed
Flatter Thom W1. When pgn-a ab/G
porlor water 5%uld 6e d;5oko'ed
At or Neor*7-op of Tate, Slip pad;
3" h:9h Curb
n
\'ski 510pe.
or, FloftGr
i
Section A- A
EL EK 9.g• D
Top of Darn
ru
.5EC ria,,cl ,8 B
SGS-ENG-313A REV 8-75