Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout930014_PERMIT FILE_20171231NUR 1 H LARULI NA Department of Environmental Qual I IV AaB LoC Ha6 WeA LOC ApB HaB Wa %AJ 9_ . Aa6 APC ApB WdD WOB ! ApC -44' HaB COB ApB ApC ApC HaB Y(Z5 % r I - Date of Visit: rrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: FarmName: ��1., ¢ Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: i--- " � U r F—, �_ I Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Title: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry C►apacity Pop. Cattle Capac!ty Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Dai Cow I alf DairyHeifer Wean to FeederIL—Non-Layer Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder D , .P■o_ult Ca aci Pao , Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Non -Layers Beef Feeder Gilts Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turke s Qther Turkey Poults Other Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesFNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 21412011 Continued Facility plumber: - C Date of Ins eetion; Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):� 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZINo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes;NoD No NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes NA FINE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes:N�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 627S /,04k j A 13. Soil Type(s): 14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued Facili Number: - L Date of Inspection: / ZT. 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes .] "o NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes : 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations.ionanyi, other comments.` Use drawings:offacility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).'. vQY��1�,��3 /�'112 • �G f ng � �S f�1-� p L 1.� � 1 j v- � ..S`S� t 5 7�� c � Reviewer/inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature Page 3 of 3 attires 1 i G Cv s e- v c-rk- Phone: Date: 21412011 Cype of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: feRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: f//l1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: .1 County: L✓2ey'n Region: Farm Name: &141- !'f, 'n j Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Phone: Certification Number: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes J2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]Yes r— ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued Facili Number: q7- Date of inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ; No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 3 �/ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a []Yes 25"No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate Public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Vj"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes r Io ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes JENo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes pr"&o ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued Facili Dumber: 7f - ly I Date of Inspection: ,7/3 i/ / 24.4bid the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check []Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �no ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: [—]Yes U7rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 12'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ENO ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes JZ No [] NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or a'nyf'other comments t 20 Use 'drayvingskof facility to better explain situations'(use:additional pages as necessary)._Z 5C-11 *fot 14/11' bl�_% Reviewer/Inspector Name: ! f Phone: �Fl9— 79/ —y-40C Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: f=/i-7/41 Page 3 of 3 21412011 Type of Visit compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit eRoutine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral 0 Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: /(/- e`G Departure Time: / = �'� County: Farm Name: � Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: I Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: I Integrator: ��'� Region�Gr Phone No: Certified Operator: Operator Certification Dumber: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: �o Latitude: Back-up Certification Number: =" Longitude: = ° =' = " Design C►urrent Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle C•apaeity Population ❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ❑ DairyCow El Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -Layer ❑ DairyCalf El Dairy Heifer ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry El Dry Cow ❑ Farrow to Feeder �� ElNon-Dairy El Farrow to Finish ❑ La ers ❑Non -La Non -Layers ❑ Beef Stocker ❑Gilts ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Pullets ❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow l i ❑ Turkeys Other ❑ Turkey Poults ❑ Other ❑ Other Number of Structures: iI Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Z No ❑ Yes. No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE 12128104 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection —/Q Waste Collection & Treatment 4j Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;2No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Arc there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? 11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) [:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZFNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes O'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes )KrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to;questton #) Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or,anygoth� r,°comments ,* r� Via. t.> I-i° Use drawtngs of faciliy to better explain situations, (use: additional pages as necessary)t th ReviewerlInspectorName ��' r, £�;' �lgt'. fit;;; 5t5.." Phone /779/-y`Zcz Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7— 60—A Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued Facility Number: — Date of Inspection — TIC Ri ouired Records & Documents 1,. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP El Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Other ❑ Yes AE No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. zYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification 'Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 2rNO ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0110 ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes PaR,_o ❑ NA ❑ NE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes F(No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ,�/ 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? El Yes IQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE Additional Comments and'/or Drawings #_ �' t `v Y Page 3 of 3 12128104 e• vision of water Quality r :Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation Q Other Agency Type of Visit ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit aRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: 'Zz Arrival Time: �UOo Departure Time: County: lyV447 Region: 8/36,- Farm Name: A_Y'Z� "G, c Owner Email: Owner Name: —... Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Title: Latitude: n° Phone: Phone No: Integrator: Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: , =1 « Longitude: E-1 ° =' 0 Design Current Design Current Design CtirrenC , Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder 3`GG ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Other ❑ Other Dry Poultry ❑ La ers ❑ Non -Layers ❑ Pullets ❑ Turkeys ❑ Turkey Poults ❑ Other ❑ Dairy Cow ❑ Dairy Calf ❑ Dairy Heifei ❑ Dry Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Co Number of Structures: Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 21No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -�No ❑ Yes 0< ❑ NA ❑ NE [--]Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 12128104 Continued Facility Number: — /y I Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): z S� ❑ Yes ,T'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes r[f No ❑ NA ❑ NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes PHqo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes j"No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;31o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) [:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) fiSrp 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes )21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Fio ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �fo ❑ NA ❑ NE Camp ents refer to iicstlon # Exf, lain ati YESIanswer"slandJor an rccomm n�dat ons or an other.comme' t' �( 4,)4 p y gg Y r Y xafia=,� # M 1 V1, v , .. � g. 'J P t � # �- � lase drawings,of facility to bctterlexplam ttuattons (use itdd�ttonal;pages as necessary}ti :�� &, 4 7 Reviewer/Inspector Name •t al,,�ri Phone: 911 ,7 911 1�7 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �`224of Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued Facility Number: I Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,"No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes ,ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and i" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Cl-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes R<O ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes '5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes YJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 3 of 3 12128104 ZK IFac>11tty NIft iO.Ut41 A ___;� Division of Water Quaht y 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation, 0 Other Agency Type of Visit Com nce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure E4aluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O 1� ollow up Q Re feti it Q En O Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit:_j I Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Farm Name: + 1 hf.E f� ��r_ !� Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: y� Certified Operator: �! r 44ltir— /Z;l i Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Title: Region: Phone No: Integrator: /""54 A Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: Latitude: = o ❑ = Longitude: = ° = Design Current Design Current Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Other ❑ Other Dry Poultry ❑ La ers ❑ Non -Layers ❑ Pullets ❑ Turke s ❑ Turkey Poults ❑ Other Design Current Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Dairy Cow ❑ Dairy Calf E]Dairy Heifej ❑ Dry Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Cow Number of Dischar2cs & Stream Impacts T 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ YesVZNoNA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? A ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (lf yes, notify DWQ) A ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) YsEl A ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? A ❑ NE 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State A ❑ NE other than from a discharge? 12128104 Continued Facility Number: 9 — / Date of Inspection / 0 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): s� Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 5 Structure 6 ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment;�No r , notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes NA ❑ NE S. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA El NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? f 11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. _ ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l 0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Rio NA NA ❑,NA VNA NA ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 224f Date: �f 12128104 Continuea Facility Number: q Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ ther Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [I Yes No ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Comments and/or Drawings: ❑ Yes o N�A,E] NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NE ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 12128104 4 , Division of Water Quality 616 07 Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency Type of Visit Corrlpliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit : RRoutine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: �=Arrival Time: `—'� Departure Time: County: Farm Name: _r 4 Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative:" Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other ❑ Other Title: Phone: Phone No: Integrator: /4 a Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: Region: Latitude: = o = 1 =16 Longitude: = ° 0 d = +` Design Current Design Current Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population ❑ Layer ..I 1 1[--] Non -La et Dry Poultry ❑ Layers ❑ Non -Layers ❑ Pullets ❑ Turkeys ❑ Poults -urkey ❑ Other Cattle Design Cur rentr�n; Capacity'. Populatiorv�' ❑ Daia Cow ❑ Daia Calf ❑ Dairy Heifei ❑ Dry Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Cowl Number of Structures: Discharses & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE other than from a discharge? 12128104 Continued T Facility Number: Date of InspectionU Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: ❑ Yes No NA ElNE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 5 Structure 6 Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Z 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes:No El NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ElYesFNo o NA [I NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeso A [I NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El 940 NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) []PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) P�, 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: -721_ 17-Z-0 0 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 6 Z z_ 12128104 Continued Facility Number: —/ Date of Inspection p z Re uired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA El 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE the appropirate box. El ❑ Checklists ElDesign ❑ Maps ElOther 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections eather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ ❑ NE 24. Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as re required b the permit? PPq Y ❑ Yesr;No�NA ❑ NE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments and/or D 12128104 Division of.WaterQual�ty. umber' ; ,>0 Division of Soil and;Water Conservation 0 Other Agency FacilttyN Type of Visit 914Co rance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I Reason for Vis IO Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: I) Arrival Time: i7 Departure Time: 7FCounty: Farm Name: ��h `�'�'� Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Phone: Region: Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: I j Integrator: t3/U Z. r2D S c — Certified Operator: IgY �� wr /�t!'1 Operator Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = 1 =" Longitude: = ° = d = di } :t« Y y r ` g ��€ ' RrDeSlgn CUrrent Desi n Current r Design Cnrrent Swme.� :Capacity,'Population�M ..Wet Poultry :;CapacityrPoptlation Cattle .d Capacity Population' ..ast.. F. { .wma;;:�.g ,� v:r. w.+F. ❑ Wean to Finish k,' ❑ Laver ❑ DairyCow ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -Layer �: ❑ DairyCalf 4 E.: ❑ Feeder to Finish �- _ ❑ Dairy Heifer ❑ Farr -to Wean ❑ D Cow m. Dry Poultry' ' arrow to Feeder ❑ Non -Dairy' =' ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Gilts ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow i � _ �� Other ��• `:' ❑ Other V Number of St�ruetur"es�°'� ❑ Layers Type of Visit 914Co rance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I Reason for Vis IO Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: I) Arrival Time: i7 Departure Time: 7FCounty: Farm Name: ��h `�'�'� Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Phone: Region: Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: I j Integrator: t3/U Z. r2D S c — Certified Operator: IgY �� wr /�t!'1 Operator Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = 1 =" Longitude: = ° = d = di } :t« Y y r ` g ��€ ' RrDeSlgn CUrrent Desi n Current r Design Cnrrent Swme.� :Capacity,'Population�M ..Wet Poultry :;CapacityrPoptlation Cattle .d Capacity Population' ..ast.. F. { .wma;;:�.g ,� v:r. w.+F. ❑ Wean to Finish k,' ❑ Laver ❑ DairyCow ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -Layer �: ❑ DairyCalf 4 E.: ❑ Feeder to Finish �- _ ❑ Dairy Heifer ❑ Farr -to Wean ❑ D Cow m. Dry Poultry' ' arrow to Feeder ❑ Non -Dairy' =' ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Gilts ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow i � _ �� Other ��• `:' ❑ Other V Number of St�ruetur"es�°'� ❑ Layers ❑ Non -La ers ❑ Pullets ❑ Turkeys ❑ Turke Points ❑ Other Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is an discharge observed from an art of the operation? Y g YP p ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 12128104 Continued Facility Number: — Date of Inspection L.L.L.J_Lol�l Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 5 Structure 6 ❑ Yes 2fNo NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre otify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYes o NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes "No A El NE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) 13. Soil type(s) M u-- 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 2No ffNA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes N El NA El NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments {refer to question #): Explain aay.YE5 answers and/or any recommendahons or any other..comments. ti °Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. use additional pages as necessar 4L Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone- Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: D Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued f.. Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes :2ZoNA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElYeso ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rain Inspection�NoZ] Eliher Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El YesNA❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PNXo.,�NA A El NE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El YesA El NE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 3 of 3 12128,104 Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit VRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: 1 v Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: L"Z4yn�,wE Farm Name: 1L_74U Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Phone: Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: A g!EWuq__ lc,. ga Integrator: Sek Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number: RegionW.= ---I� Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = 1 = Longitude: = n = 4 ❑ 1{ Design Current Destgna C•trrent .W rg! Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capac ya P�opulatian Design Cattle Cap city Current P pulatran an to Finish ❑ La er ❑ Dai Cow ❑ Dairy Calf an to Feeder ❑Non-C a er f ", , ry P u try A ❑ La ers ❑ Non -Layers El Pullets ❑ Turkeys ❑Turk-y Poults ❑ Other El Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Daia Heifei ❑ Dry Cow ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish So 0 ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ Gilts El Beef Feeder ❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow Other ❑ Other Number of Structures: Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑/No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA FINE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE 12128104 Continued Date of Inspection I Facility Number: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 54No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 3"0 � 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ No ElNA El NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes V1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE maintenance/improvement? 11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area t� '2sa4 12. Crop type(s) J[;�5 6 u i _ 13. Soil type(s) 32 - LiSJx-& 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 6 I9) 9 h ❑ Yes 6No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'[] Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE Reviewer/Inspector Name �� s IuN fi �' Phone: yam_ [- 7c7 O ,tE Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L.._ rJ . +N-- Date: -71 iy I o% 12128104 Continued Facility Number: - Y Date of InspectionULItg— keQuired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [?] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 21. e appropriate the box below. ❑ Yes Dim Does record keeping nee i proyem n ? If yes, tgWasteAnalysis V1 No ❑ NA El NE ❑ Waste Ap nation Weekly Freeboard ❑ Sdil Analys's1is ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification ❑ Rall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Min Inspections [IMonthly and l" Rain Inspections El her Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes u No ❑ NA ❑ NE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Ycs No ❑ NA ❑ NE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Vj No ❑ NA ❑ NE Addtttoteal C oiri m e n tsiinit ao--Drawiaps * ` ,z ' �� �g b.'�y .'�3 N..$V`. �-�.coM n►°�o� �-v, c.urt'T`h-C--t-cn��-a�J Sw C.�D �tia- G°s. o R,.rc� CaN�v��IIjC. .SL-va6ti � V- i � E� A i� c , �.*r° 3 �.! CAL,? t3 D �� 12128104 Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit A Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access Date of Visit:*LOM=tOerational Time: J -'o'b Facility Number O Below Threshold Permitted ?Iertified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or ;Above hold: ......................... FarmName: ..Al..r /.... T it county: t^'................................................ ........................................................................... ty. OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No: MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... .......................... FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... Onsite Representative: 4,�1't�t1 —P6 .... Integrator: .............. .....................................`............................. _........... _................... Certified Operator: Location of Farm: .................................................. . Operator CertWcation Number: ......................... , ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 49 Longitude • 4 6� Swine , ,;3„ >Ca 'acit ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish t°°:' Layer ❑Non -Layer ❑ Farrow to Wean���, Farrow to Feeder 5 ❑Other Fi „�i'+T © Farrow to Finish Gilts ❑ Boars Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ►i b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 rent ❑ Yes Z(No ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ Yes 9KO ❑ Yes XNo ❑ Yes ❑fo ❑ Yes 00 ❑ Yes 9�0 Structure b Identifier: Freeboard (inches): 12112103 2 Continued Facility Number: - j / Date of Inspection Imo^ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc rc 12. Crop type 'F-` S 9— 1 M_P&431 is s! 4 C 3c 9_zvN r t t\A- 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Odor Issues 17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. ❑ Yes 7- ❑ Yes (No ❑ Yes pTT0 ❑ Yes %VNo ❑ Yes ❑ Yes o ❑ /VYes �lo ❑ Yes�o ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes �' o ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes P&o ❑ Yes P4o ❑ Yes ❑.N0 ❑ / Yes QWO_11� ,...•:r'.Y"�r:�.....^�.. a., ,�w�;•::�_•c .•.��:r ..,!sns � ...�. .�•N, r ^tN:...:�.i>•s�xrrrn�rar Y: r- uesbon # . Ex lain°an Y1S.attswers andlo an :;recomrnmendations7oraa ��atl;er.cantntents'�p`rrt Cornr�eats (refer,to}q ) ° I? y y „ y }Y�:?dt�YIE. £Y; �.eC�"r•} .s. .. I E6 }. .R,a l4i:G' ...•�dW.;."a.:tEYL6..K6.a....'..M:,;1:;uu�is'33&?Et6,`}a+€�im.�8oeve��t73:3 � . �sa 3}�}.rp°� a9 EF .s, i E��� .� E `� ,Use drawings of facility4o7better expla�tn situations. {use addibonal,pages,as necessary) ,E Field Co Final Notes U y ..: �. ta!�r1,Ik .,���lik.i�sE�3 m r�--w•+w f Reviewer/Inspector Name 1�. J i, . a _ ♦+... ,tea }4 , _, ��. .aill,l „: � , x,. . , .�.n .• Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ---- Date: Z110 b Continued / I 12112103 i Facility Number: — j Date of Inspection S(- Required Records & Document.; 21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & GeneraI Permit or other Permit readily available? 22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 23. Does record keeping need improv P ment? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Waste Application ❑ Fre oard ❑. aste Analysis ❑ Soil Sailing ral 24. Is facility not in compliance with any appla�e setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? NPDES Permitted Facilities 30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) 31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? 34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Stocking Farm ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall [:]Inspection After V Rain ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes P"INo ❑ Yes Zj No ❑ Yes ONo ❑ Yes pr�o ❑ Yes �No ❑ Yes V&o ❑ Yes )No ❑ YesANo ❑ Yes ;WO ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [--]No 12112103 IJ Type of Visit 1:5 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: P0_xotODerationL1__QBe1Qw Time: Threshold rjr Permitted )gCertified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: Farm Name: �VtZ� �'�'County: LI Owner Name: Mailing Address: Facility Contact: Phone No: Title: Phone No: p �J,A � fit, AD Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Location of Farm: Integrator: __- CAK-e-ZL_L_S a,rt—„_A Operator Certification Number: F ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0• 0` 0 ff Longitude ' 1 0 Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I I 1[:]Dai ❑ Feeder to Finish ILI Non -Layer I IE] Non -Dairy Farrow to Wean m ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity ❑ Gilts , ❑ Boars ! Total SSLW Number of Lagoons f I ILI Subsurface Drains Present IILJ Lagoon Area —Li -Spray Field Area Holding Ponds [Solid Traps I� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System �' • ,.. f Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Ilow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Identifier: Freeboard (inches): 05103101 ❑ Yes EINO ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ Yes 4�fNo ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes JE�oNo ❑ Yes allo ❑ Yes Z'No Structure 6 Continued Facility Number: Tj —I Date of Inspection [ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ic/ trees, severe erosion, D Yes 0No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes ONO immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? El Yes �No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Flo 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level / elevation markings? ❑ Yes No Waste Annlication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? El Yes , ,� ,ICJ No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type t " C- ,U*A ► VVZ' 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes OR'N0 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is p�ended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No t.rk 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes PjrNo 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes O(No Regllirgd Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, frecyard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 'VO O 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ZNo 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? ❑ Yes [,jNo (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ;21 No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes O No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes XNo © No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer to question #) Explainatiy YES'answers and/or unyrecommendations or an .. other comments g � _ ., � ary} `Ilse drawings"af faclJity to better�explaro situattans(use additional pages as necess," F►efd CaAY ❑Final Notes cs-oc�- j2.�ra WJ" G— Ar ar D P<= L,L C�.A "i ce - Reviewer/Inspector Name- Jl Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r Date: 05103101 1 Continued Facility Dumber: — r Date of Inspection ' l Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or at pbrmanent/temporary cover? Calyes ❑ No Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes PNo ❑ Yes OrNo ❑ Yes PNo /[Yes ❑ No Additional�Cuniments;;andlnr,Drain" Z% Pf Z,6132- }-Lpl 1, -SS 7 '7 v"Z - tS Zy tta .) VIf-bV-A J g L-V 05103101 L1-76/„Z Type of Visit OCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit f0 Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number ! Date of Visit: 6 * ° Time: ro Not O erational 0 Below Threshold Oermitted RCertified D Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: Farm Name: �� t„�Szr 14 rs t.'.— County: 1.1 t " E"5 Owner Name: Mailing Address: Phone No: Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: Goxf/' Integrator: C-AW'fl Q" ot'r Certified Operator: Location of Farm: O erator CertiEit 4tion Number: V ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 C 66 Longitude 0 6 Design Current Design "Coirrent Design Current Swine Ca aci P.o ulation P,oultr " Ca aci Po uiatlon Cattle Ca acit P,o ulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer HINIon-Dairy DairyFeeder to Finish ❑ Non -La er ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder � z- ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design C*apaeft ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars 'Total SSLW Number of Lagoons © ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ Sprav Field Area Holding Ponds 1 Snlid TrapsOF— ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: Freeboard (inches): 05103101 ❑ Yes dNo ❑ Yes Z, ' ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ Yes 7xo ❑ Yes ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ Yes �No Structure 6 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection Z S 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes Uio ❑ Yes 'PYNo efy/es ❑ No ❑ Yes "NNo ❑ Yes eNo Waste Ammlication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P<0 S 11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No �Z Zc� f 7 12. Crop hype �� Cam_ Al C . _3 = JDi� �• Sa l s _ +k4w— 106 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ,0No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Cl Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes )2NO 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes XNo Reauirgd Records & Documents � 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverkgbr & General Permit or other Pcrt�rni readily available? ❑Yes No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal +Visa§t Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) - ❑ Yes � No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri lion, f`r�beard, wa analysis & soil sakplKeports) ❑ Yes ,r No 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 0 No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes eNo 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 1 0 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes -ETN"', 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 8<o 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 4 N0 113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. .r.L a ... bi�tw4in': Comments`((refer to'�question #) Explam any Y�ES)answers iindloir city re€ommendations or. any;,other cotnm€nts. lJse diawings of facility to better egplainys[tnatlOn3(use edd.itional ages as recess ry} Field COAY El Final Notes i .: �tp , s 1 ]� W€E�-` �� 5 t1r 'ii7Z77 Tt��S /�WST- '3C_ MA,Jt�CT-'D r 'ram �i .a►t9 vFa c a v�tZ_ ReviewerlInspector Name ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date: 05103101 r Continued a Facility Number: 3 —� Date of Inspection "t2— ,.I Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Additional Comments and/or Drawings:. . �6 7, ,) 46 1--4-6JEa- ?-F-Q J=I&FIj 11 a mod_ 4:4- ` CJ r M Yes ❑ No ,ZYes El No ❑ Yes •LEI N, ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ Yes XJo /N El Yes �I No A Yes ❑ No 05103101 7 .r _ s V 1�1 Type of Visit oCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit ;'Routine O Complaint. Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: 131 Time:E It 3D Not O erational C Below Threshold j3fermitted PCertified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... FarmName: ................... no:- ................... County: .... .......... 14e�.................. ....................... OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:................................................................................. :. FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... MailingAddress:.............................................................................. Onsite Representative:...... ! ...... ` fr........................:....................... Integrator: .......... e^A. �. rL... S►.......... r-.—A...... Certified Operator:. Operator Certification Number:.................... Location of Farm: [3Swine [3Poultry [3Cattle [3Horse Latitude Desijn Current ' I)esi` Curreai iF S'iiwe {' Cappacity PopulatiiliQ qult P ry Capacity Populadi ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ,5700 0 ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Longitude • 4 66 Jo Design Cattle 1 Ca acit _ 1 ',] Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity , "TotaLSSLW Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes fi!rNo Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes P(No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes PKNo c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 'ev" o 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �-No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes KNo Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: '.................................... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... Freeboard (inches): 3� 5100 Continued on back 4 -r Facility Number: / Date of Inspection i 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed . (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [�No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes P(No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health ar environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? j Yes ❑ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes XrNo Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ErNo 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IwNo 12. Crop type f'CXL F_ %WA G;QcR+►� QUA- S a V A-'AAJ'l W A.Zjw 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [:]Yes ,EjNo . 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes )21'No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 13'&o 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ANo Required Records & Documents + 1��qy 17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &•General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0'No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes j2No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigion, frealfoard, waste analysis & soil sample r f) ❑ Yes IRNo 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? �� ❑ Yes 12140 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes O IGo 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes A!JONo 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes .TNNO 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0<o 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes.,O'!Vo 1Nf iplaiiQtis'ot agf cje�cie vi re ]moteo- �11H`tng t t�s'v�s�t; YoR w��� ee lye o t}t�kh0 • . . riesno deike. ah6tif this 'visit` • ........... • • ..................::.. co . t F €- tac ,t €r fl t Fd-�i >51 F 1 Fjr pgp6 'i '1;� SEA ; ily ` irawm- of facrlity to better'explaiin sitnations (use additional pages as necessary) < r�.,{ ( '��;, , ? yet , k y ,.... �,+ „ -7 owir- Wrc- V-a $" o%A i i0r CSfEc1"AL0 W.si Ps MIST 3� Mq, ;.rr� P.J �J��..((��Ta r44s s � 6�� �.s ► ¢ s=p v� �s r,�,• a-� . rc�.i trn r ` Reviewer/Inspector Name €iEEiir.�S'�F,1:;;7j�ri�%a,;;!,.w,.,;E:t.��;,rly�ri>Rie'reE'r�,P�}:�,ln'i Reviewer/Inspector Signature: [,.,� ..i , (a ,,,,._T , Date: $ ! l -*I 5100 ♦ r. Facility Number: Date of Inspection Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below �es ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? XYes •❑ No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ,ETNO roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes .2fNo 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes /No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ;3"No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? XYes ❑ No Additional -Comments an or rawtngs. R 2 � $ 3.*- ,^Jn c a.dG Q.Ir ¢rip a'i Pi'I Atf_ IOU.4LIT/ f� PCX L X QbVUV-..b 4T;�;, - vi s J r. ( Ty v 1' i2z'h'O'Ve L.oCA 5/00 �Q Division of Water Quality. Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation ` . . O Other Agency f 3 Type of Visit 4DrCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visitj2rhoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: I/'3b Printed on: 7/21/2000 Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold Cermitted)E'Certified 13 Conditionally Certified '0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... Farm Name: (:ountv:.......�..! ............................................................................................................................. Owner Name: �`� 1 ° ZS .............................................. �......................................... .............................. Phone No:......................................................................................, FacilityContact . Title:................................................................ Phone No: ................................................... Mailing Address: ................................... Onsite Representative:...... A.e ' ......Y--•.A.�?'................................................... Integrator:..... c... LL,.. ........ t....Vx ............... Certified Operator: ................................................... ..... Operator Certification Number:.................. Location of Farm: ►1 wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 7(o a 3Z Longitude ®• Design Current. Design Current Design Current �7Wlne ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars latton Poultry Capacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer I I JE] Dairy ❑ Non -Layer I JE3 Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity Total SSLW Number of Lagoons I i I I❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges & Stream Impactti 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gai/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Structure I StrnClure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): Y� 5100 ❑ Yes )2(No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes PIKo ❑ Yes �'{fo ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes j2 No Structure 6 Continued on back 1 f Facility Number: 73 — Date of inspection s Printed on: 7/21/2000 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes QNo seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan'? ❑ Yes 01No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Z No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings'? []Yes o Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;31�o 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes �No 12. Crop type C. - $FAM UDA PALk + G Fc d A—, t<- (z n s 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes o 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the Facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes *No Required Records & Documents l or+ 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General ert it readily available? ❑ Yes [2-No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Wadte' M1 1nagement Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes O No rr II ao 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, fre . oard, waste �n!tlysis & soil s ample reports) ❑ Yes No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ZrNo 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes 2 N10 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 0"No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes PNo 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? El Yes �No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ;�o violatioris;or' deficietictes'rvere noted' ilirriEng this;visit: Y;oi} will-reegiye iio furthO correspondence: ahoU .this 'visit::::::.... ' ' . ' ' ' ' . Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): 5) ".PJ L-i L AA-6c S,aC-T- 3.00,ox aer Af ,J' C,f v LAP-Ge r `n CUT) AL Ed Reviewer/Inspector Name b f 4, J- l V ni T' n 1 1) 5-7-1 — cf .7 0 J Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �C,, _ .1 - {-S Date: M 1 z. S f C, 5100 i Facility Number: ?2 -- / Date of Inspection 1 v ZS Printed on: 7/21/2000 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor hplow PrYes (:]No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? p4es ❑ No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes &No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ;3/No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No 31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 0No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Q--Yles ❑ No Additional'Comments and/orDrawings: 1L£Q.►i¢,E� A ie. Qo4t_.i r- t-*C PF-c T- Q JY 5100 J d Wat� 1. Q Division of Soil ait FF �! s !), 3 Division of Soil and W0 f }� j� �'.D1yisipn-of Watee.Qualtt -vation -Operation Review ', { vation ,Compliance Inspection �FFr ' t;ff`� 11&11Ce4inS[fCCt1(1] i��l�a i�rri �E ' 3 6 3r rG tiI ! t `tli'� ay. Q Other.Agency - Operatlon Reviews h- )' f r}, i Routine oComplaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other Facility Number Date of Inspection /t 1 Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm) Permitted Of Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Not erational Date Last Operated: Farm Name: ......... ... County: S.JA...................... I.. ............ I ......... . OwnerName: ................................................... ..................................... . ................................. Phone No:....................................................................................... FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... MailingAddress: .......................................................................................... w Onsite Representative:.. ���!T v� .......iM..1:.r.4.................................................... Lztegrator:........ ......... & ................................. CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:......,................................... Location of Farm: i .... ...................... ........... ........ .......I........I....... -- - - -- - - J-.-- Latitude ���� �• Longitude • Design Current, _ Design Current Design, Current = - Swine''E Ca acit Population ','Poultry. ` iryn' ;Ca tacit 1'0 ` ulalron"" `Cattle Ca acit' . Po iiilation„-_ ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer :' ❑ Dairy ❑ Feeder to Finish "El ; ❑ Non -Layer ;; ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean i s:, , E ! ! 7i: ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other ❑ Farrow Io Finish r Total Design Capacity ❑ Gilts, ❑ Boars �tE ! �l��r ��, :;Total--SSL''W ] , Number of Lagoons, , ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoou Area ❑Spray Field Area Boldtn Ponds / Solid Tra s g' p '"] �" ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System i Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNO Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes INo b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �To c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes f INo 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ;Z'No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes O'No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structuro 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Li Freeboard(inches):................................................................................................................................................................................ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No seepage, etc.) 3/23/99 Continued on back Facility Number: — / Date aft' Inspection 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes dNo (If any of questions 4-5 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes o ❑ Yes No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes VNo Waste 1knplication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [/No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pondirig ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ((*No 12. Crop type C 'A Est u Ar r- 13. Do the receiving crops differ with th se designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ;2'No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes �No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes XNo Rettuired Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes R(No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of.the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes O"No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes VNo 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes >N0 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes )�fNo 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes R<O 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes �No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Y6'IeNo 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No 0' TS •yiofaio is:or deficiencies mere lio(ed• 04ring �his;visit' • Y;oir WilE•reoeiye Rio; hirftilet` :. 'corres oric�eitce. abut. this .visit ..... . on # Ex laen an ES answers and/or an. recom Comments�(refer to, quash ). � p y YES y mendations orEany othertcomments 9 E ,� l• �'� 3'� Use drawings of facilityAto better.,explain situations (use;adtutional pages as•necessary)� v3 t `H �+ /� i�fG(Zr 1'fFp �Ac_rrLrrtl',r�S MvSd- r-e r A t,JQE#-_- AeD LoG 7) T A eo is -Lc> Po 6-- /-r- r,< a,/ rNF .�� �ru,�t sMlic,c. T�aaS A:_ CerX'AL� aF 6�co�rfa f_bGr 7�'°r- �o Reviewer/Inspector Name��; ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date: 3/23/99 y V Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below �`es ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? A? Yes ❑ No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ZNa roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes VNo 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) [:]Yes ZNo 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes XNo 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? z Yes ❑ No �dona�o,mm...ents n or _ rab <w.r�n.g.s. :.i:i'1.-', �,i 11.414, �?`t 1 o ..1. i;1 _ i..! 3.. •- . ': Zy) �.1c..� �ra�,•r�-t.�y. c.��Ay�,Sr� T�1�5 �Jorr- c�J�.,',.�� �r� s�►� , M 0 R-T'A r D! S r5 t;L N C. EA— L11r—at'C-CQ ?7 3/23199 Divisiori'of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review / [] Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection D Division,of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection 13 Other Agency - Operation Review .&ouline O Complaint O Follow -tip of t)1VQ inspection O hollow-u of DS1VC revie-, O Other Facility Number _ I)at:e. of Inspection 2 t k[ne of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm) © Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Op p]crated: Farm Name: ..................................... ..... County: }} ,�� }}ee��.t..L"....................... ....................... Owner Name: .............I'ltone No: FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:...........................,.................................... Phone No:................................................... Nlailing Address: .............................. Onsite Representative:..... ..l.11.L......�"L!� Integrrttor:.......1` l.'' .......................................... 5 Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Optrator Certification Number:.......................................... Location of Farm: r................ ..... .............................t ! Latitude 0 �� �•' Longitude • �� 0°' Design Current Swine Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry_ Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity Total SSLW Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area Holding Ponds I Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste \Management System DischarLes & Stream Imparts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes 101 0 Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, +vas the conveyance. man-rnade? ❑ Yes No b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes No c. If dischar-e is observed. what is the estimatecl flow in eallutin'? d. Docs discharge hypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes ;eNo 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;ErNo 3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ Igo Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structurc 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Frechoard(inches) J.'.!................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1/6/99 Continued on back Facility Number: - Date of Inspection 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Z ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes V No Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 1PNo ❑ Yes �z No %Vi. ste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/imprmemcnt? ❑ Yes [a"No 11. Is there evidence of over application'? ElPonding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes <�No 12. Crop type � 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes r No ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ Yes PfNo ❑ Yes Ef No ❑ Yes ,21-No ❑ Yes jZfNo ❑ Yes ;2/No ❑ Yes ?1',0 ❑ Yes P6lo ❑ Yes �No 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agTency? ❑ Yes [. lVo 1P.N.O..Nitilations:or. decide -noes .were noted during •this•visit..'You "l.re�ceive nay further ......... it .. �i.bout: this .visit.: ... .. ........ . .. ::. .... : Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any_other_comments. Use'drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): OF }f:✓ /�h�7 OP Lam' SS 0,0 CUI-IFX 5-U CrS f OF- Reviewer/Inspector Name RevJewer/Inspector Signature: / f j'i 1;/l� /47 a 4(41 d - _ __ - Date: '-ML alb 7 11/6/99 ,I � 1 Fk� e �1 n 40 Revised January 22, 1999 Facility Number- QrTtvaLr,r,G57LAN l-��C Part Ili. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination 7 1 331 9-1- ta- FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, ins pectorlreviewer will have to combine fields to calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination. FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map. COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50% of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Sack -up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible by irrigation system. $r q-24-1, of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency of Water Quality Ila Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DIVQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other Date of Inspection 2� Facility Number _. ........___.....,._..._.........................:�.� Time of Inspection Ea O 24 hr. (hh:mm) Registered Certified 13/ Applied for Permit0 Permitted 0 Not Operational ,{tDate Last Operated; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Farm Name: !.L.r. u�.....K n P ei'.`.............................. County: .V✓rl:r%.��.................... ....................... Owner Name:.. ! u e- kt h Phone No: L —qJ �O - VS %'/ ....' ..................................................................... Facility Contact: ..5.. N rL ......... Phone No: ................................................... ................(n.�......................//..................... Title:_ MailingAddress:.� I 11..2.. Il..i� -.. Wt9vidw /v L oZ %} � ................................................................................................... r .G' � ✓/d /l S OnsiteRepresentative: ..�......�......u.r...........q._�.�..:............................................... Integrator:............................................................................ Certified Operaton-1. !. ~. ._k. µ .... L"m J/............................................................. Operator Certification Number .......................................... Location of Farina S 0 U Al l P/1,3 G.a Latitude F '10 ={I Longitude 00=' 0« to Feeder :to Finish i to Wean ito Feeder ito Finish' ❑ Layer I I', ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Layer I I I0 Non -Dairy ❑ Other �— Subsurface Drair No Liquid Waste General I'. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 7/25/97 Area ❑ Yes ONo ❑ Yes No ElYes ZNo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes VNo ❑ Yes El Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes Continued on back w ,a Facirty Number: 3 — S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes Structures (Lagoous,llolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Freeboard (ft): 6 ..................... // .................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Structure 5 Structu,c ,, ......................................................... ❑ Yes 'o ❑ Yes 'o ❑ Yes No (If any or questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes _ No App lication pplication 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes i o (If in excess o��f��WMP, For runoff entering waters oftheState. notify DWQ) eC — 15. Crop type 4 .^ �ttr ........ ................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑'Yes No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o ElYes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No 22. Does record keeping need improvement? El Yes o For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility -fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No 24. Were additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No 25. ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'! ❑Yes No No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this- visit. - .Yo'U.W'i11 receive no 1'u'rther : eorrespondenee:i out-thisvisit: Comments (eem6et6;question #) Explain any YI;S answers and/or any recommendations nr any ether comments � Use drawings of facilityto better;explain situatirinS {use additional pages as necessary} k q w, s 7/25/97 ;t _. 'Other Agencvf €)phi attvnZevte�s- ltnutine O Corn Taint O l; ollow-ta of Dki itts L tion O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other Facility Number �__� Date of Inspection Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm) Q Registered D Ceertifwd' 0 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 10 Not O crational Date Last Operated:.... , FarmName:., ...rr (3�,....... n............ /�t(V. ?'.......... ............................... County:..L,)a...................................................... Owner. Name: ................................................... ................................................... Faciifty Contact............................................................................... Title: Mailing Address: Phone N. o; ...................... ...................................- Phone No:................................................... Onsirc ILepresenttatiue:.. u�................. �. Integrator....................................................................................... -.G................................. Certified Operator:........................................................................... Operator Cert�cation Number;.......................... ............................. Location of Farm. - Latitude �• �- C, Design Current Swine Capacity Population Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean 'arrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilrs Boars Longitude • ' " Design Current Poultry Capacity Population 'Cattle ❑ Lave: ❑ Non -Laver Nttrinber of Lagoons / Holdtng Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area ❑ Np Liquid Waste Management System General 1. Axe there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ydNo Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes V5 No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the Waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 7/25/97 ❑ Yes P�No ❑ Yes VNo ❑ Yes C"N,o ❑ Yes t�1V0 Cl Yes T No ❑ Yes o Continued on back ,► i Facility Number: — 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ZNo Structures (Lagoons Molding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VNo Structure 1 Structure. 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Freeboard (ft):.,. 1-f 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Ye701 11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Ye12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Ye (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes Pr No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes XNO (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type .. 61J&-................................................... .may. u��. � . ........................................................................................................................ 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes QNo 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes FfNo 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes fdNo 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �To 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes VNo 21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ,8 No 22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes � No For_Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yesy! 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes WNro 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes UrNo 0, No.viulations.or deficie><ncies.were ttated,during this:visit.; You.'W'ill i&e' ive-na,ftirther :•:•correspondepceaboutthis.visit.•:•�.:� �:-.•�•: : .•.�:�:: .: .: . .•. :.•. -. :�:.�.�.•: : :� 1 .3, 6_V�,U-O )�D P9 C E7t/�W 7125/97 Reviewer/Inspector Name %�...� :l�i�l'5.:'��`..�-- ... Reviewer/Inanector Sienature: ./M AA .A.r,_. 1; [! 1, i Date: %/17 1 a S( ti -. :. �0-y�D�ivision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑Other Agency , 1 IN ,r " `. L!� u1Vl51ori of Water Quality m� ''s �` -" 9' � €`��'. 9°?:..�':?'^.;ae�„::s'?�L'3sars;�[^�."`V'�y'¢":.r,��'?'�'"r?:ga.,�;�:'�°��.rE.�.�r"-:,�:s�.?�:<dx:�?++o{og:. ,.;.,"°�•e6Yri t^"^aR'g�ay�.' ., m,�`",. :� .:�$,.. larl outine O Complaint O Follow-up of MV0 inspection O Follow-up of I)SWC review O Other #d��J Facility' Number Date of Inspection \ --// Time of Inspection �\`•C�J 24 hr. (hh:mm) Registered MCertified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..................... Farm Name:.... N. nqY'.... .: ^� .......... .. County:..... . ...................... ....................... Owner Name: ......&Y-Ak.34�!�.....�.:..,...��... Phone No:�.�Q�...�~��. ti'� �1�...................... ....................... . . Facility Contact:..... ............. Title:......f�S ��1Y!QX'....., .......... ......... Phone No:. �............................ �.. . ` Mailing Address: .... �� ,...... >c'14,.....� �.�.`.i�,.......... �lSt�!!( YP�f i��..hi �....... ................................ .......................... Onsite Representative:..�'. �!.4.y,r T� �`�.1 Integrator. ......................................... 1..................................... .. ........................ Certified Operator ....... P - my...... ,: •..,y.,.. ......... Operator Certification Number: .................. Location of Farm: II...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... -- Latitude 1 « Longitude 0 1 i4 General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;_Wo 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [I yes lkK. Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface: Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? .d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than ]agoonslholding ponds) require maintenance/improvement? 5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 7/25/97 ❑ Yes RKo ❑ Yes 2-90 ❑ Yes [111 o ❑ Yes "o ❑ Yes G' 1" o ❑ Yes 524o ❑ Yes U<o ❑ Yes Io Continued on back Facility Number: 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yeso Structures fLagoons,Ilolding Ponds, lush Pits, etc.} 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes UK' Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6, Identifier: Freeboard (ft): ....... ... .................................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes M-Ko 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 9-90 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?`s"'d kAz" ❑ Yes RKo (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes [qlo Waste ARplication 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes UN (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type ....4t3.x.:>. .....y.... �- �....................................... 16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? E Yes ❑ No 17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ < 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes , LKO 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes M-No 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 1 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ,[ id�fNo 22. Does record keeping need improvement? des ❑ No For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes U H<O 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes El-<o 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No No:vit Ikions-vr deficiencies.wer'enoted_during this:visit:-:You:wili receive,no.furrlie r-: Oerespotidehce about this'visit'.• : • . 22, . r s ek - r� c�cx�tl-�tlti� 7/25/97 Reviewer/Inspector Name �x Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - � p �� Date: Site Requires Immediate Attention: Facility No. _93-14 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: July 27, 1995 Time: Farm Name / Owner: Arthur King Mailing Address: Route 1 Box 118C Warrenton, N.C. 27589 County: Warren Integrator: On Site Representative: Physical Address / Location : S . R . 1310 _ Phone Phone: `y ': �, Type of Operation: Swine _XX_ Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: _1300 Number of Animals on Site: DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude: 36' 32' 34" Longitude: 78" 09' 24" Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No zt3 �?- Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes Actual Freeboard: 1.7_Ft. Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? No Was any erosion observed? No Is adequate land available for spray? Yes Is the cover crop adequate? Yes Crop (s) being utilized: Coastal Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? Yes 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes 100 Feet from Wells? Yes Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? No If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes/No Additional Comments: Pine trees and pok erry all ver am. Inspector Steve Mitchell Signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed. OPERATIONS BRANCH - Od Fax:919-715-6048 Jul 18 '95 15:56 P.05,/07 Site "ircg fmmcfwa Auantian" — SM VasrrA ox ORD rLa 1!99s Owntr:J4 IG�,Q 17.G Henn Nara: ASent Vasit+ g Sit= t?IaGTBtar: A.„ r PfsurKs� On Slte Rerm-Wrtz1vo: Mono: T"hysfcai Address• r� 1 M�+ilirrg �.Idirss: � TyM o perntiou: SWiac I'ouit&y cmdc Akxai�a Cs�city � D Sri Nttmbcr of AjAtirnvU ®Sitt: 3,1 ,�LOUSUU& z iyptof Inspc drm.- GmU'Ast ✓� XmW Occlb Ycs or Iio Dries the ATu:trsi Waste LMaon huvo mCicicut itet7bcnM of 1 Fcat + 25 -yw 24 boss stvjmcvdnt (hpprc-mi=,:?y I Foot.+7 bzcfws) cc r i*iQ Acid Fr=bpard: ;�- r-ect — inch&% Pcr facilii_es with rnem tan Ta c t, address the cdwr tsnaom' riczbo td Inde: tbo commits %cation. Wns uFwy r- c pW oWerved Iromthe IAgnuu(s)7 Ym -a(�D)Vax ILC:.,ciesioa crUZ Jara?: y=I as� IS adalutte iand avaflsttie for I nd sr rs�? Qq Ida Is the c:tvcr ct t :dcgnni i .tr .AddiduLial Cncrmctttr.,�i� caa_ cf .J. :�v C Fit�� rt` (9I a) 715-3559 S;gnaiurt orAgon State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Raleigh Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Arthur King Route 1, Box 110 Warrenton, N.C. 27589 Dear Mr. King: EDEH.NFZ Division of Environmental Management September 3, 1996 Subject:Compliance Inspection Report King Swine Operation Certificate E000787 Secondary Road 1300 Warren County On August 29, 1996, Mr. Steve Mitchell, from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. Also present during the inspection were Mr. Randy Watkins and Mr. Larry West of the Warren County Natural Resource Conservation Service. Mr. Mitchell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed. It was noted that a significant number of large trees are growing along the toe of the lagoon slope. Although these trees do not pose an immediate threat to the integrity -of the structure they can compromise lagoons and cause them to seep wastewater. It is recommended that the trees of less than six inches in diameter be removed and the lagoon berm stabilized. Al the minimum, the hardwood trees should not be allowed to grow on the toe slope of the lagoon and the crest and interior of the structure should remain tree -free and as weedless as possible. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Water Duality is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection please call Steve Mitchell at (919) 571-4700. Sincerely, i dy Garrett Water Quality Supervisor letters.piglking cc: Warren County Health Department Bruce Perkinson - Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX 919-571-4718 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N40! CV C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper Facility Number:93-14 Division of Environmental Management Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record Date:August 29, 1996_ Time: 1100 General Information: Farm Name: -Arthur H. King Farm County: Warren Owner Name TAuthur King Phone No: 456-4377 One Site Representative: Integrator: Mailing Address:Rural Route 1 Box 118C Warrenton, NC 27589 Physical Address/Location S.R. 1300 Latitude: 36/32/34 Longitude:78/09/24 Operation Description: (Based on design characteristics) Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals ❑Sow []Layer ❑Dairy ❑Nursery Mon -Layer ❑Beef ❑Feeder Swine XX Number of Animals: 500 Number of Lagoons: ONE (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon) Facility Inspection: Lagoon Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No X Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No X Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No X Is any discharge observed?: Yes ❑ No X ❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made Cover Crop Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No X Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No X (list the crops which need improvement) Crop type: COASTALTESCUE Acreage: looked areal Setback Criteria Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?: Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?: Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?: Maintenance Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Does record keeping need improvement?: Did the facility tail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site?: Explain any Yes Yes ❑NoX Yes ❑ No X Yes !] No X Yes ❑NoX Yes ❑NoX Yes ❑NoX Yes ❑NoX Yes ❑ No X PLEASE CALL IN ADVANCE AND TRY TO SCHEDULE MONDAY INSPECTIONS. THIS IS A PRODUCTION FACILITY AND BIOSECURITY IS VERY IMPORTANT TO THESE FARMERS. Signature: cc: Facility Assessment Unit Drawings or Observations: Date: Vs Use Attachments if Needed Site Pxlguir= lmmcJ ata AtimntioQ.. . F�o�lap Nnrrb,rse----L--{---- Sr E'ISII:'A' aN 0P-0 DATE.- 1 199 5 Owner; ALI /� f�--� �! G Farm Name: Cocmty: 2 agent V?ail.; g Sit= Al 3 0J.,CM101r.. Pane 1 27 On Site ReDmwi malvo: PhD= Type of 0Pcr dPu., Sw;nc Poultry Catllc . Design Capacity: -4:5�o o ;ium9xr ofAximulZ can She: Type of lnapccdcu. Gnsund _ Acdal Circle Ycs of No Docs the A itiftl Waste Ligoom hp-, s iruTicient fmateard of 1 Foot + 25 Y= 24 hour storm cvdni (appra *Wcly l Foot T 7 Aches) , es r No Actual 1=imam. _j_ I'-r-ai Imiai V= faC;lh�es wil more t�--= c= .'r7Sorm, l4nme, adit mss the cam :agfl a3' fr=bvpxd ?;ever th-C Colluixills scj:d no. WIIS any seupssr- observed Lmm dui lagoon(s)? Ye -I o a * as (Lc,k—w crasim of dz clans?. Yw o dv Is adtlqueEo land available fnr laird aopik=ian? Yes r XTa Is the cover crop »dogoatw?<S�r No Addilimiai Comp enm Q Fm fo (91 a) 715-3559 5ignaium arAgoit �t- t C F 1 i q 3 -1q ORIGINX Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization RR6 This plan has been prepared for: King Farm Arthur Holt King 977 Paschall Station Rd Warrenton, NC 27589 252-456-4377 06-27-2006 This plan has been developed by: Larry West Warren SWCD 820 US Hwy 158 Bus. W Suite 102 Warrenton, NC 27589 (252) 257-3836 Developer Si Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal waste management"that are included with this plan. e" .0 70-- -, - �- --7. -- '6� - oC Signature (owner) Date Signature (manager or pra ueer) Date This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Plan Approved By: Technical Specialist i ture Date ................. ..........- -------------- --- --------------------- ------------------------------------ ....----- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Cover Page 1 RECEIVED i DENR i DWQ AQUIFFR-PP0TF7l0N SFCTIDN d' MAR 18 2009 Cb �. Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following source(s): Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan. S1 1 Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 1,930,500 gals/year by a 500 animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 2979 Incorporated 5116 Injected 5634 Irrigated 3238 Max. Avail. PAN (Ibs) * Actual PAN Applied (lbs) PAN Surplus/ Deficit (Ibs) Actual Volume Applied (Gallons) Volume Surplus/ Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 3,238 20284 -17,046 12,093,203 -10,162,703 Year 2 3,238 20113 -16,875 11,991,206 -10,060,706 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source. * Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Source Page Page I of 1 Narrative There are four (4) tracts of land on this farm that are used for spray fields to accomendate the waste generated from the 500 sow farrow to feeder operation located on site. Three (3) of the tracts of land on this farm are located entirely in the state of Virginia but administrated through the Warren County, North Carolina Farm Service Agency (FSA), Land owner,lproducer Arthur Holt King asked for our office to devlope a NMP to reflect all acres on all four of his tracts of land. In this NMP the Virginia tracts are identified the letters VA in front of the tract number, the North Carolina tract is identified solely numeric manner. The tract listed as VA1341 was enlarged by the owner in the Fall of 2005 that increased total wettable acres to 15.7 as documented by Division of Soil & Water Enviromental Engineer Carl Dunn from the Washington, NC office. All cropland on each tract have been evaluated and wettable acres have been determined. The individual fields listed in the NMP are now actual irrigation pulls, thus the field acreage listed for each sub -field is the wettable acreage for each pull. The plan is based on pulls instead of fields for more ease of record keeping. .......------------------------------- ........................ ..................... . 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Narrative Page a Page 1 of 1 'r,e table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop s P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available. If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers maybe recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High. Planned Crops Summary P205 Total Useable Plat Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating Ll Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbslacre) 1353 10-1 1.62 1.62 Low NIA Wedowee Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 46 N/A 1353 11-1 0.82 0.821 Low NIA Wedowee Fescue Hay 29 Tons 46 N/A 1353 1 1-2 2.10 2.10 Low 1.0 Wedowee Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 46 NIA 1353 12-1 3.29 3.29 Medium NIA Wedowee Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 39 bu. 31 NIA Corn, Grain 108 bu, NIA NIA VA1339 1 1-1 6.68 6.68 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 NIA VA1339 1-2 5.99 5.99 Low N/A Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 N/A VA1339 1-3 2.99 2.99 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 N/A VA1339 2-1 1.50 1.50 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA VA1339 2-2 4.57 4.57 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A VA1341 1-1 636 6.36 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons NIA NIA VA1341 1-2 6.28 6.28 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons N/A NIA VA1341 1-3 3.14 3.14 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons N/A N/A VA1342 13-1 1.50 1.50 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A VA1342 3-1 2.08 2.08 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 85 NIA VA1342 3-2 3.81 3.81 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA VA1342 3-3 3.03 3.03 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5A Tons 85 NIA VA1342 4-1 3.29 3.29 Low I NIA I Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 N/A VA 1342 4-2 3.97 3.97 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 N/A VA1342 5-1 5.46 5.46 Low N/A Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 N/A VA1342 6-1 4.75 4.75 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 N/A VA1342 6-2 4,75 4.75 Low I N/A Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 8-1 3.66 3.66 Low I N/A I Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA VA1342 9-1 5,58 5.58 Low I N/A I Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A PLAN TOTALS: 87.22 87.22 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 PCS Page Page l of 2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance Low potential to contribute to soluble None 2 nutrient leaching below the root zone, >= 2 & Moderate potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. nutrient leaching below the root zone. ¢= 10 High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils nutrient leaching below the root zone. available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples > 10 are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of --field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391). PLAT Index Rating P Managenieni Recommendation , 0 - 25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application 25 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application 51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal > ]00 Very High Starter P application only 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 PCS Page Page 2 of 2 NOTE; Symbol * means user entered data, The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland „eedgd to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source n3 Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbslA) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs1A) Res. (lbs/A) Applies Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbslA) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 ga11A Tons 1000 gals tons 1353 10-1 S11 Wedowee 1.62 1.62 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 124.59 0.00 1353 1 l-1 S1 I Wedowee 0.82 0,82 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 63.06 0.00 1353 11-2 S11 Wedowee 2.10 2.10 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 161.51 OM. 1353 12-1 S11 Wedowee 3.29 3.29 Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 39 bu. 4/I-9/15 1 152 0 0 Irrig. 152 90.62 0.00 298.14 0.00 VA1339 1-1 S11 Appling 6.68 6.68 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 971.73 0.00 VA1339 1-2 S11 Appling 5.99 5.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 311-9130 244 0 O Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 871.35 0.00 VA1339 1-3 SI1Appling 2.99 2.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass flay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9130 244 0 1 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 434.95 0.00 VA1339 2-1 S11 Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 219.20 0.00 VA1339 2-2 S11 Appling 4.57 4.57 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 664.79 0.00 VA1341 1-1 Sit Appling 6.36 6.36 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7131 240 0 0 Irrig. 24C 143.08 0.00 910.01 0.00 VA1341 1-2 S11 Appling 6.28 6.28 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 898.56 0.00 VA1341 1-3 S11 Appling 3.14 3.14 Fescue Hay 5A Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 449.28 0.00 VA1342 13-1 S11 Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 215.20 0.00 VA1342 3-1 SI l Appling 2.08 2.08 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 brig. 240 143.08 0.00 297.61 0.00 VA1342 3-2 S11 Appling 3.81 3.81 Fescue Hay 15.5 Tons 8/1-7131 244 O 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 554.23 0.00 VA1342 3-3 S11 kppling 3.03 3.03 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7131 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 433.54 0.00 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page l of 4 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source iD Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbs/A) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (lbs/A) Applies Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbs/A) liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tans 1000 gals tons VA1342 4-1 S1l Appling 3.29 3,29 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 311-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 14108 0.00 470.74 0.00 VA1342 4-2 S11 Appling 3.97 3.97 Hybrid Bemtudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 5%04 0.00 VA1342 5-1 S11 Appling 5.46 5.46 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 brig. 240 143.08 0.00 781.24 0.00 VA1342 6-1 S11 Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Berrnudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 6-2 SI1 Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 8-1 SI1 Appling 3.66 3.66 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145,47 0.00 532.4E 0.00 VA1342 9-1 S11 Appling 5.58 5.58 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/E-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 811.7E 0.00 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 12,093.20 Total Produced, 1000 gallons 1,930.50 Balance, 1000 gallons -E0,162.70 Total Applied, tons 0.00 Total Produced, tons 0.00 Balance, tons 0.00 Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 2 of 4 Waste Utilization Table Vnar 2 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres List. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd ([bs/A) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (lbs/A) App[ic. Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbs/A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) olid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1353 10-1 S11 Wedowee 1.62 1.62 Fescue Hay 2.9Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 brig. 129 76.91 0.00 124.59 0.00 1353 1 l-1 Sit Wedowee 0.82 0.82 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 811-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 63.06 0.00 1353 l 1-2 Sit Wedowee 2.10 2.10 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7131 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.9E 0.00 161.51 0.00 1353 12-1 S11 Wedowee 3.29 3.29 Corn, Grain 108 bu. 2/15-6/30 120 0 20 Irrig. 100 59.62 0.00 196.14 0.00 VA1339 1-1 Sit Appling 6.68 6.68 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 311-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 971.73 0.00 VA1339 1-2 S11 Appling 5.99 5.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9130 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 871.35 0.00 VA1339 1-3 S11 Appling 2.99 2.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 434.95 0.00 VA1339 2-1 S11 Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 218.20 0.00 VA1339 2-2 SI l Appling 4.57 4.57 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 664.79 0.00 VA1341 1-1 Sit Appling 6.36 6.36 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 910.01 0.00 VA1341 1-2 Sll Appling 6.29 6.28 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7131 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 898.56 0.00 VA1341 1-3 SI 1 Appling 3.14 3.14 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 449.28 0.00 VA1342 13-1 S11 Appli,g 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/3) 244 0 0 Irrig. 1 244 145.47 0.00 218.20 0.00 VA1342 3-1 S11[Appling 2.08 2.08 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7131 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 297.61 0.00 VA1342 3-2 S11 Appling 3.81 3.81 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 554.231 0.00 VA1342 3-3 S11 Appling 3.03 3.03 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 433.54 0.00 VA1342 4-1 S1 ! ppling 3.29 3.29 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 470.74 0.00 VA1342 4-2 Sit Appling 3.97 3.97 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 311-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 568.04 0.00 VA1342 5-1 Sit Appling 5.46 5.46 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 781.24 0.00 VA1342 6-1 Sit Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bcnnudagrass Hay 5A Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 6-2 S11 Appling 1 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig, 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 8-1 SI l Appling 3.66 3.66 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 532.41 0.00 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 3 of Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid PA Eert. (lbs1A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure Nutrient Nutrient NutnentA pplied Applied Applied Applied Rcq'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field) (lbs1A) (lbs/A) (lbsIA) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gallA Tons 1000 gals tons VA1342 9-1 811 Appling 5.58 5.58 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8l1-7/31 244 0 0 [rrig. 244 145.47 0.00 811.71 0.00 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 11,991.21 r • s.f-. eh Total Produced, 1000 gallons 1,930.50_ Balance, 1000 gallons 10,060.71 r' Total Applied, tons iw,'-'-: 0.00 Total Produced, to ,•.' ,; 0.00 Balance, tons ' =- `. _. 0.00 Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 4 of 4 The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that maybe applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application event. Irrigation Application Factors Tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (inches/hour) Application Amount (inches) 1353 10-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 11-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 11-2 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 12-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 2-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 2-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 13-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 3-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 3-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 3-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 4-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 4-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 5-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 6-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 6-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 8-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 9-1 jAppling 0.45 1.0 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 IAF Page Page 1 of 1 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified. The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen. Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR )L N (lbs/A) P2O5 (Ibs/A) K2O (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract FFeld 1353 10-1 Req'd Nutrients 129 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 A.r.q App. Period 1.62 8/1-7/31 Su liedB PP Y ,r 4,�.��hlp"-'I i r% `r r t� CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Wedowee Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 2.9 Tons 04-16-06 Manure 129 691 176 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 46 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 69 146 16 1 3 1 0 Tract Field VA1342 4-1 Req'd Nutrients 240 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 3.29 3/1-9/30 Supplied By: mm � � Pm R _ m .�Igll.4 Ly� wm CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 5.4 Tons 04-16-06 Manure 240 128 328 29 1 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 66 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 128 278 29 1 5 1 0 Tract Field VA1342 6-2 Req'd Nutrients 240 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.75 311-9130 Supplied By: �'; �, P, �ii t•f,El_`i*•� f .,kr � >,�..?�t;, `�,"�?.�,�")_� z,� ..w'�`,'� 6� '. i?�•`'?,ri�,g'i� ' 1•,t;!a�i CP�i ,,, _ s�;'r;.�� ' 1��r. r a�'s� r�,� CROp Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.4 Tons 04-16-06 Manure 240 128 328 29 1 5= 1 0 P Removal Rating 66 ]bs/ac. Low BALANCE 1 0 128 318 291 1 5 1 0 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 NMR Page Page I of 1 The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal. In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production . Required Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation 1353 10-1 Fescue Hay 6.0 0.0 51 None 76 None VA1342 4-1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 6.4 0.0 80 None 248 None VA1342 6-2 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 6.6 0.01 76 None 278 None 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 STV Page Page 1 of I The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column. Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied. Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern. Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table Crop Maximum PA-N Rate lb/ac Maximum Sludge Application Rate 1000 gal/ac Minimum Acres 5 Years Accumulation Minimum Acres 10 Years Accumulation Minimum Acres 15 Years Accumulation Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard Corn 120 bu 150 13.16 17.85 35.71 53.56 Hay 6 ton R.Y.E. 300 26.32 8.93 17.85 26.78 Soybean 40 bu 160 14,04 16.74 33.48 50.22 ............... I......... --- -------- --------------- ............. -.---------- --......... .-..... . ... . - ........... ­ --...--...----............ .........I. ---- ..,. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Sludge Page Page 1 of The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero. Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste Storage Capacity Source Name I Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Li uid Design Storage Capacity (Days) Start Date 9/1 180 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity (Days) 1 1 149 1 2 180 1 3 180 1 4 180 1 5 180 1 6 180 1 7 180 1 8 180 1 9 180 1 10 180 1 11 180 1 12 149 2 1 118 2 2 180 2 3 180 2 4 180 2 5 180 2 6 I80 2 7 180 2 8 180 2 9 180 2 10 180 2 11 180 2 12 149 * Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. ------------------------------------••----------------------- . I-----------------------------------------------...................................... 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1 Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management t. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. ---------------- .... ----- --------------------- --------------- -------- ..-- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Pape 1 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ------ ---- -- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Page 2 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (S) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. ......... -- - -------- --------------- ---- -- I ------------------------------------------------------------------- ........ ---------- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Pape 3 Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): 12-1 Corn Piedmont In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 Ibs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-1, 6-1, 6-2 Bermudagrass: Piedmont Adaptation: Moderate to Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3" deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row. For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 Ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts, Winter -kill is a frequent problem in the Upper Piedmont; Coastal is not adapted there. Tifton 44 is the most cold -hardy cultivar. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronotnist or extension agent for assistance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ............................................ ............... 720129 Database Version 31 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2 The following crop note applies to field(s): 10-1, 1-1, 11-1, 11-2, 1-2, 1-3, 13-1, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 8-1,9-1 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to feld(s): 12-1 Soybeans -Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting, Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. -------- ----------- ­ ................. ­ ...................................... ..-------------- . -- - 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 CropNote Page Page 2 of 2 •,<rJ• • hr. ^'�. iFr f- '✓ _+ "� '� ,-��r. � :.A.;t., "' :� frr 3 >s±�• 21 T F' a+ [ ft• �+' sr' r fyw-.-t'u4 -Ri n?aaa #� •4 •W ,.•a '., ` , t r _ ,.%' +1 cY rt�� -r',s *.•�!" .Gf[�.� t r{ tr . a . a ,w, .F Y.r ,mod! k f J?rJC'ik��� '' t it F frj .•t„ �y, `'.5L �?j' F•x.'C ri?r, i KIN I :�+s �-•�1.1��}�� r1r .��s ��7 i' �o � { l �. ,r '.gip:: y�az� + aF "�• >r� } ,�;� . k s �,�'hF4 to : �'} t/ �`� x�.l• t•- 1'S' ;�` f � ` i;� a'�Y are' 1, �j• � •�- r•F 'S}.�.�-,��"YriCyjr r�,,�a•�.';Sf +ra. • by ln.. tt ''r'= ter ",� '.. N r ..' .. �Yr- .�'� �� �.'rs f t � �: � ' r s .. ' r• � �`�t Jct,� �}swu��f'`�'•} Qk d, - � a .: . JS yet• r � ,�"' tYx I .� ,4 �� r{t. r.+x-fr�'•i•.-'{�+ _ 5i •'��'Fi l� i. t. 1 F E✓ r t', �. r a �T t M'a•fk; Eli �Ji - _ �r�i �.-•� - �r3'� r`SE�� r��' _ �.+. ;• �.. k+. w9Rt'y t;z" ��^+ �-��-tilr'►`rf.'�....�.^�-- - �' .:.�,. _r. ��- +-� +� rig low WA lU Ar Y, \x �� re��r Y •ram "�: & s�'{`�`;�� f II y ',{ ! '}��" 1 � ' _. a.4 it ! fR+��t•� 9� F'„1�f,r }'`ys t +Q, ' +l's•'=_:ii^at j•L�r{� • ±'"�J �F I �JI ', tit 1 wo-i, i.�AN '`�i]T!,j"did'iTF�f, � ��.�'�_• r f� �,.y�.�''� ��G,�rr� ���`�� . �' " L.F' �. 3 / � .. ��^i�r.t n� �•� . r� 'Er .t � � f'"� ` '•' �: L, ,'��,�Yr _ '���< < �'������ +1" `�r'• iS., rs r ''>!y�"�� r+ ^� + r , � w"_•ti ,�(,liY,,, r: ,. ��, � i�� h�S;[ �' �� • � - �'j. r' § ii r a h,. � +th' r . .. r {F rM1 _ _ j w , y �,n iJ� tI1 rt 3S �.A',w�rC i{k r"S•A,.;''',L ,�,tS _ r, t 6•,.r�r �. SG,� 1�"-°`}' �(1 TO; If f tiz s� r .Eyyt .. ar. �•, ,, Kt. .. tyY �.;� .?�;xi'• Z r 1 iL _ .h•, '�r.�t�;9 '"` x.l, f-�'al j• 6' �'�.?. e 1 �s� �exF•�' he +7. Y•' T.y[r r ` iY .;. �y1��.4a * � ��� k �� � C9r�t'�',�y'S+"��7 ,� .�•�"�, `�' 'S •+:, �r r � iti•xe+.vi �� r �.�u'i�u *'"�G`L'}�y'. : +` y .�/4J•t•'`-t.lkrFH4r,lu . r3. Y��ry}i,�fy .'1 �. S' ���•y� ' �, '.�' �.+�i�h ��.� . .r' 1 A. 4 r'.'3 '� � t 51� .F`Y � YS �%�'a' �, r1 �• •T•'Y -1iiM �''. i•� \ /`.r �' '11A�B"� ' i �. .� 111 1t.rz �f<.• ��f`: F', fin•, T;: � S .} �y.,. . � �� � r �'�' �' r ? T.'�" 1 . . x�r I.eG� i:.: $ _ ',r'"i; i. ,��-r`t� �:•�i�,� n•r`�r+:{�?� Y .,. . 1 w '. �tw � jr .• ~'a: ,...._. T•v- �y�F/� �r — dG ,1 /,',',,jjA �w'3. i f � ice,!"` �s �� �� � �� + ,r f � rr, .+I ' 71�'._ y. •T+"�.:' 1ry%r R. S•' _ �"'" � t� 7 • � }.'�4 Xu ° 1 L r t c1 3F'*,.,'a- {F11I -�"F' � •x4 '_�" �' r � F•` tf ,C Y,��t,� r���i �r� ,k�c.i F{l�� iy�w�.� �. S z tYy'7 •i ' ,i„ ,•`ji yJ r �'-,Y ���] �J"n.A'p';tt. t^/`.t.: s .-,• `Y'�;f�^c T` d F. f r q,(y. 'ry' '•�i; y�.� Jii, �}'i u ?i h j , + 1 a - +k `� .1 ?� r. Gr.s x• C.,.4y r^ f` �^'siP� '" rr �t:r, I�- ret r 'Ih ,,�7 {jj y hp ".�1•. .f i :F' •Tr'� r.1L:' �� r � -� 3 ,-'! 5;! � e'3:�1 �.,. � � �` 7 'L t�:'•� 'n:..f - � [. � I ,t,ry; ? �G�y'��, µ s � .�V o j � ,( � 'ir`F�r �.•,, e�' i � ,i� (? ° a"r 4 � :;+ '•''i,4..� i'�;w Lt; �'F +;+ �"�� � �� -{.•-;.�Y's"F�s,� {r� "iy,'iT `- � t'�F:�,i� c •�+lS'ptrA�' '�i' � 1`:i�"'Y;, a 4 s. evjj.' t�p3 a� 'r�, to + G '. y.ir x h� ti •` � r �, ,�,4 t' sr. r 5,�;;g 9 35,�'�� i'4 � � '; i... k. �ri,`' yr, �,•, �:, �+ w fA: )',�; �- �' !S. J,!-F } r?L' ! it iH � -.� •1 h`� L `Y. ��i {.., `rjT���/:,�.r �.3�1�,' K � �{!,µ'• Y � n�f��r�i s � `14`[Id .ri � � � �� f i�L `wh ' ` . lb € 1 a 1 � ���4 � t , ��r � icy . �, k�, 4 •n. �:.r"� � i ., �,:"�, howNi !• }i ti' �'�'t s !T = �Y f, ~ r�S i t� S A� i= `Gd � i•t9;� ;f ,�.. '� �l d,_ l'ir•' �hr 'iIS'd �.lk�^c`+�Gi L���H '�' t .lL=> .�r„ ��.3 ��Ar�r,f �, �'r ` �Ss,`�..rc�"`}�lY�r .�i,;�•I.•.F •�a't�`��a �s�"'�}�i.. �{'.A.•�k F .� .�.�a is i� {'�. `�'�^�_ ��' a.� t.��!.•{d,• y'C .a. �-L.��"' `��� }'l. ft 7''�S{ii;`d�i•• r ^4 �` � �� � t- � �"- r � x l 'W" I- Soil Legend for Arthur Holt King North Carolina mapped soils 71 B Wedowee 61B Wake -Louisburg -Saw complex Virginia mapped soils AaB, ApC, ApB is mapped as Appling WdD, Wob is mapped as Wedowee {„y,y., r, t a r,-t �. ter- �' t• r..S -g t . � . r : ,., ,ii. Y... � vi�r�+ ,r{ � .. _ !'T. Y .y •. j� T� -7 . - r i ar'1!:•. �'n� "' k.. ZNAIk, W•,;1 �' V ' i:y..'S s?1F .0 /".c! 1 '• a `y�- j�1 iti �y:•r-�j` '•. `T Y.s.'•• j * t• 'r i �y� ', \ S��y j .`,�� �r �S �1, q��g�}-� r� YY -rL'-- j.. fix ,} ti i }� - � ,,� r. / �� •� � v �xl( " y {i'�r'Y { :�� � �„ �� t � r�'SJ', T'�i,�• y�' �; F;sx r i ti ' ii j( ' r� •�� ' �' �� j ,�'.�Y {� i � � _a'a;d.� fie, ;�.i�f >a +. 4 .�.`yr,•�=�'� � rt^"t ;,i! - �w}. t ��.= ��t''t' • �- � �'"• � •z - r'•as�' ..., i! ,`� �i.• �. �Fl �r>s �:j'h� Ywr; �s�{: :i .yam 4 / sy R. `«%s}��f '.r`�jti,+L t�t; s` I_�._•� .tom r!, �'rr"r ;ty,W•��i`:��r.°fJS, r�s.}�.y �j„ti�,.f��4�T �.� � �sr if'iiT •py, '!�•!+'r'< ��f�.%h�.j�} �.r(�� Y.� �� �� �'i F��'��r� �.�r�r,4� '� � j �1! F�ii �J��,r�S�f� r '- le•- i�1 a�'�tY;ic_ A�-aa 1 y�' �t3 r'rc � •�'y �.`. \ i r is5 �•- ! f ,z:. <'�'�h s''� � a �. v•� '• . �,r.i`-�t�r•�e �_++� � �'r?,'� r Krr�r�.t w.� l�i ;n' •��r _ a } ,s 7. �� S, ��� �� ,� . `:.t`r ,2�y`y� � ` }l�y�/,;+e }� �y. r'j ��` �- : ��l.r '��r'a, j ' I �•3�1s'' x. a 1 `'•�1s.}'_ r--.' • 1, • 1 'i�' � •-r- � .1 • -a'f 5^ �r�, -'t-"- 7 r � .1�.�. � 7 � � ti.:r�r''�'�F�• � �1'`'- , ;,7 '!� `" �.,, - a��Ca��a7 ' � ' 1� . - Y {� � J, _ "� 'Sty '' �' r i ` "' 3n� "- fr � . , •', �•�_ •�, �, ,- T �"�1�F •.:""'`-�'"� M� F, r �� •�r li, '''Br, wY it .lid r, µ . — � ` '1 ��, � .. • a IuVa4":�{•�i � J �:y rv- ~;� ,• - r�•. `•� i�tC�e.,r'�' tii4� F' F} -' s., .:`,a.'•!' � � Rtt'` ,, -�}'�' �`' afli AT FF r?.-. .� ''tJ -... ._� 4:,.• ,,,_ :t•t±i �'� R". :r�_,4�L:; ! , '�.,1' •s'� ss'l E f i '*;Fr ,firA1.k" r "i �,is r' t �;: '•`„^' '�5'{�+i' 7�Y '�."� � f �F • :5,y��••. �,�:�� f �i%�'�� r •! '� r T� !-y_' '�,,'-_ �•�Y�~ ;` •:r�l! � ,-.- .F.; .. _. �fe �'4+i M1 /� k,�' T � • ♦ a 4 }` y • ,ram ,.r. �. ��� �� �,� - �: •!! :•� 6r JS�j�' • �1 '� '�fY• �•' ' � • "�t'��}'��'iil' r ri q a11:' � IM f' � `�tti3 y ,,1 ' , � ��ti s 7 F-'�lw ' '� t��x �i.�': ';'Y' �k= a�i�.; n Y� , ~'j', 1� �,,x' �•, �� � �aA � F V F' i;:rr���.f.�w ��..T" : l �� ,t�ji '�.� '�.� " a� `edr•, Y I L7 ,~'� �:ri�.• r_ k t�':��:f, �--T' irL}'r'�+ti,"'.s .� ~rti .t _{',��t C.�.,ft�F. � t � f �.�. � y�- �• :7 s:rs,`:xq,'• FN71er!' fla'.4 �''iS,:. yr^"'"-=''.s;Jr"', F,,'r,l . 1j^1til+.;t. fi - ♦. r+-i- ��s fit, �..� .. � a r a 'r'"* lr�„ �� �� ��t.•�s ={r t,/f r�7F1 _ i !' iC� ��• �:p�* 7C�_a for"'14; �i� \3 u,• t�• �h r ¢'`''�°i-��:.�. , r�. �.•-��,"'S\ ,ttr d�.,it .�pr *' V• v� r`}�` �,��.�,'� . J �^� ���,.%";tr=9 �� _ n �ry�W'� 1 1 i�l'�- ' � �,�r�V� 1 _ [ �{p.:' t't"'� ��i� /,�'►- l T��aT ��Ci; a,::'+ -� �ji�,,J Y J �r,�e•�_ ! ' �"I .s v r {I ��� r'} �'.t'�s�`r r . 5�aj t �'�=;'+:. �• �:• �yV'l ` r 4� � J�r� F,;'S e „"�9 .n j- irfi.?f ' +� �ait-�^ � F , rr .dl. ' ►, ('�*� 'tw��e,��t ,�:�:. ; .. � �'a,_ ,e'tii c i JJ F �• ! a -f' .,r:. • u +d'ti1 � q i % }� � j ,l�•:r! 1 o- Z�'t�ri: r r,�%�4 � •3 � !� `l•�� l ,� 1�� • �<- x� �t! !1 r � ,aL�-ytr�.:Lo�'r_ ti f" • � ' qf7,�„�: S''"�, M� ! �t `-a�3J �` <-t . �� �'f'� l�' � ,. `y yS . r� �, t2 .a '�'�� 1► :.;'". � ,t-w -�Y: � '!t. hy','j ? y� 7� � .h.- •� •r+ .t ,� ' � �!-�rwr' � �� . ••yid t'-,r F J�- l it �.M: f' s rr 1 � : • •.S i' 4 � "74 i ! � ��,'> r' b•`• .rr i i' -fir '"• 1'Z\t: �` �. p Y 1 : � f �iyr� l' r � \�'1y ° }•,7� l{.�(65,�` y ;j n N •'�r�,� � �-� t "• i.y+' a {� S` fi to ' ' i � �� L -k" � }• ..j�".,• �' • � � � n � �� a — ��,�� : , f�l �� � ��P � ,r � 1 t. � '",.�', +raj ` c -" • i' „ .��y ,* mot' t�� • '� �`[(I{ •� _ � _� " t4"�t F'3,}�a�• r•�" �" Y f � � � y � ip�„rr� 1 �� �_ r��� rw9�. ..{';d _ r fI �� �.�ii�fr"3�' i{'JYJ 'Mb _,,., , , •3 r• a ,A, u. r. T • � 1 . }��y*� z f { `Vo.r -"X'—•r"r .tli'l `- rsr ryy F#,.tr .i.ly�"ns,•<,'.. .��' 1, { ;~`'�' • � ��U rl r�: � �"! ,'t .4�j�� '�'�+:L,�i'' f. "., �, 1'�^{c -_b�r� rr - -i .+}�� 415 j+•;7' �T�:Gp-r ^s. �I Y�4 ..r T lZrwa .,4,:- u tom' Ij"►'- .I• }� 4 � i`�.!' •�i � . � � r � �..,'G'•�{• ; a ��.•'�1�'A'�K' ,, y - �� � J � �s...'._'s-'' r � ''i°'1..?-'..'i �.. wu,. �'. ' �;.s�r�r. .. • � w s fir. T� �'' V ��.. � •� r 11 �?a�� : � . '�J 1 � - � • ,>yryF � t.6.:a �! '}., i tiy►' K .1 :.�. #3 Y r •I ,� Li '. � f• l� ��f �` ,s. , rqa 9 9, 4 ;r'�r:�� , .C� r, s � rs,i; y''•^y, �.€:� �'7 s� 1' ,. .i1 lx , �,C� : .. rs' �r \'• ''''•_r , rw f•/ , Za4� t n. �a ; !i� } i�r "�M s �� n` r r;C �.r+''''*:•+' ,e;>♦''�4i�i� �F`" � �, rr i• r 7 T i 2 +� i � 1�'.` •y `yr...r �r•'X f r 'J`_ wt-� 1 '�' �r' fl 1 ^Tr a• ,�' +� l F " fY� a ` �4 � x; 'Z r;�' - r c Y r j rC- i t �f �`. ��+ ti, :> Li":: to y t f _sr s... M4"�•.t' � !, �:6.�r � :�j•��3s' r� ", r��� -,; +;5 r�{ �"�'r'V',:4i 'a'i:! � : �sr�.v Vt� � i�.cu ,`.� � n� �r + t rS `�# •"[ ti� +•s "1f� 0. -ti-`� •'��'''C"i�� ar,- ;� - r {r sR � •"C s.' � '•,� r �(� _ t y: nafy z < �t '•r-1,,� . •3't{, 1.; •. .r 5"} aih l.y *'n�`i�{vj•1 k+� �. jam' r ,r \ - a �,`-" i �,-:: a* :�� a ax ''w'a r r S-ry "�:�,-r .h -a- -+, - tw'•�i. ..,,'.F•'trt''Ci A t-+'#-i'i+_r 4 �ei, : +t �� ;�, ,rt.. S-,r �� ''t�. P� r.ir':,: f .rr A'���"�:s�.J• ,�Y� J ��cx n 4"- � :�4y. t..:••-, \ � � µ #�i�ICt/rl -��A� ZL�.�r�fe���H��•' ��'•`7 �i. -�: 7 a',� 7 r k'� :'ram � �t'.. _�Y t .rri 1.. ','��" .t s '`�;i tS R • QF! -1J'j':.f Y• 1 � �' �.0 r-.. �i .-' '�:..�_` .� �� r- \. �. .: j*�V, . � i�:{ ' �Y_tVr,,I.a r T.. yp C �•�, t'ri 1�+.� ' �.;,' � : .w ' L � '+� pax. ,Tt�.nY I'"� at Vrr: �'rr f � Ar � , � r � �y t _ 1 •� �j 4}�, j Y� s i��a!/i���.45j1.F ��� � ��77 -R ? 'r�j �, �T'N' a 5:i :pr_ t� Y•.:• "'�'a'.�J�. '' T. 5 �.' ,.�'' Y '�YJA rr �"�n[ t: i � / l .�T T fiR i•.•jl .� y:` - •?r iG M' :n ..r all, �tg�s�`��rt�'1� i'+fc'.u�• ��������-� r .'r- ` i,' ,•., Jr" YA�.j � ; ' ��� it 4, i•". ,. � aM. ! ;•tip ����y�f Yy - � ''�. r ��f� [a hl}'ra .��h t' �tih WN .:�{,��� .�tyVi•'.:�,rt., y'�,� k '"zTj 1#�'4. ,rt � . 1r ¢ j'�' �} N4Li ilau.+T, t atnwsrw� rA � ,�f}•� ".��ar `sJjy..�._i a.«+.:5. LP �''•ai �1 (, i, i'I,f• Mak` rA - J� ,¢,a ..L, •c :�+w. 4 M• a� t � W "t•S.S `..,. .rarre�s«n.sy.� "`•%-::4: }•-�f•S, J.-�..s r!'" �-,J""._��� �.'-ra �,y�c17•� F, 1' ' �(Mriliiple worksheets mop be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) 11-9- 3 9 _ Field number (identification) _ _I _ (Vq Fi•e i d� 2. irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes _ 4 # Interior lanes _� # Exterior lanes �&0 feet) Length of pull(L1) 1 # Interior lanes # L—xterior lanes ] L0 [feet] Length of pul)(L2) # Interior lanes i # Exterior lanes ti �dD[feet] Length of pu]](L3) 4. Wetted diameter 336- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet W P- VA d vj ;'A V = Z. `7 j ' 5. Spacing 4LLA Q Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout bt Multiple hydrants ^ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. j Travel Iane length (L_) Interior or �C Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0A 16 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table CL 7d Column 5.35 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) (Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width Z7 [feet]) / 43,560 O. C'i 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table C-6 10 Column E 6 ,, b 80 Total acres for 'travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Z Travel lane length (L_) X Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) Q, 925 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E T Column 3 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) T (Pull length-7 �f D [feet] X Wetted width Z`� 1 [feetl) / 43,560 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E Z1 D Column R 5* 9 9 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) )-3 Travel lane length (L-) Interior or : Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0-915 (a) Acres start end of pull from TableE6 -10 Column 13 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length � 10 [feet) X Wetted width [feet]) / 4 3,5 60 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E6 D Column 46 9 Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Surat: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. is . (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X I # Lanes = % , Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X I # Lanes = S• `1 Acres Z `! (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X I # Lanes = 2 .. 91 Acres 1 5-'— Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Suns: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Signature of technical specialist I� Date: 4 ~22,0 b (Multiple wmkshaets mays be needed) HARD HOSE- TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 1 ' 3 Field number (identification) V F [ �� 2. Irrigation system designation ,� Emsting irrigation system ____ New/expanded irrigation system 1 3. Number of travel lanes Y # Interior lanes 4 Exterior lanes , 60 ' feet) Length of pull(Ll) # Interior lanes l # Exterior lanes SZa [feet] Length of pull(L2) # interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3.35" [feet] from Field Data Worksheet Wee_ � t,,,; d+1,. = 7- -7 l ` 5. Spacing Zy O Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants — Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 2 ~ Travel lane length (L) —X- Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0.8 7-5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table G L 7p Column {11:�_ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) {Pull length 00[feet] X Wetted width Z ? 1 [feet]) / 43,560 L*)L 3x5 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EZ 7 O Column 5 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)C I/Z, f," 1 1 Z..� Travel lane length (L_) Interior or � Exterior (lane/hydrant) D • 915 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table & -7 0 Column _6 .3, Z 4 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LZ) (Pull lengthsZ© [feet] X Wetted width x'71 [feet]} / 43,560 O, 4 1 CgW (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table &E7 Q Column ✓� Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L,) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length, [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 1, S (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X I # Lanes = 1' S Acres 4 5 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X 11 —# Lanes = L1 j S! Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 6 . Q 7 Total CAWMi' wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date: Le- 2 1-0a Signature of technical specialist {Midtiple woiksheePs may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) -f f Y j Z Field number (identification) L F l d) 2. Irrigation system designation bt Existing irrigation system _New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes _�_ # Exterior lanes 7t,0' feet] Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes _ # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet} Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 33s` [feet] from Field Data Worksheet w e4A9-A w►`A+-4. = Z`i 1 f S. Spacing Z �{_l� Hydrant spacing [feet] (as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout — Multiple hydrants 04- Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. C1 _ Travel lane length (L, Interior or X Extetor (lane/hydrant) ©.`d Z (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column 9 �. �✓ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) {Pull length200 [feet] X Wetted widthZ-11 [feet)i j 43,560 0- Ll I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table t✓ Column 6^ Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table ____ Total acres For travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) Interior Or"`EXterior (lane hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table — Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) Column _ [feet]I / 43,560 Column Column [feet]l / 43,560 Column 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. S� S (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X I # Lanes = Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres ✓-- 5$ Total CAV MP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 6V _ Date: Z7'"06 Signature of technical specialist 15 (Midlipte ivorksheets ma), be needed) HARD HOSL TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTLM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL 'WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 13 y Z Field number (identification) ` v'q r-- , � 2. irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system T New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # interior lanes i # Exterior lanes feet] Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 3 5 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet u:e+4e d w,'A+, =� Z-7 1' S. Spacing L+-1 C1 Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants X Single hydrant —Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. `r Travel lane length (L, _ interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0- � 2 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table ti * Column B 2, L1.3 `-4RM_ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) {Pu111ength[feet] X Wetted width2.7 1 [feet]l / 43,560 0, Li I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 0 Column 3. 6 (c T Total acres for travel lame length (Ll) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L,,,) _Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]l 1 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acr6 for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) _ _ Interior or Exterior (lanethydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet} X Wetted width ____ [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column _ Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3, 6 !o (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = 3.�4, Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 3. G (.0 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80 Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 62 �i"h-"`�_ Date: 6 22 0 6 Signature of technical specialist (Multiple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET Farm number (identification) 13 `-I Z Field number (identification) (O HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM & ,9 F 18) 2. Irrigation system designation J Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes S feet] Length of pull(Li) # interior lanes I # Exterior lanes J55-e [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 3.'Y [feet] from Field Data Worksheet Coe-,4vA ;,,k'A -4, = 2-"7 1 S. Spacing � D Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Ik Multiple hydrants Single hydrant J Excessively spaced hydrants 7. head the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 1 Travel lane length (L_ _ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) D, ci 15 (a) Acres start end of pull from' Table 6 6— 7 D Column . `I Z (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) {Pull length5so [feet] X Wetted width Z,i [feet])/43,560 Qy I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table f-6 7 0 Column 15 y .7 5- Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c) Z Travel lane length (L_ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0 91 S (a) Acres start end of pull from TableCC 70 Column .3 2 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) {Pull lengthf 5c [feet] X Wetted width 7 I [feet]) / 43,560 d y 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EE -IQ Column d� �. ­75 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from 'fable Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. Li . -75 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X [ # banes = 9,75 Acres 5' (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X I # Lanes = cl .7 5 Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres I - 5 Q Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Girt C/�-'mow Date: i�-LZ-06 Signature of technical specialist -Y T h6,,Aes 01� H1d 7 (Midliple worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL'WORKSHEET `\ 1. Farm number (identification) T i y Z Field number (identification) �q 2. Irrigation system designation ;K Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes . --j # Exterior lanes m6dfeet) Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 3-5' [feet] from Field Data Worksheet w fie. A W _' 84-L-t , Z-7 1 5. Spacing LH O Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants X Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. r ! Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) n 0, S'Z (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E { o-t Column J `f L.�- (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) [Pull length(c 5D [feet] X Wetted width 21 l [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table C D * Column E 5, `f la Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]l 143,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lame length (1-2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (1-3) (Sutra: a + b + c) S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 5, 46 (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X 1 # Lanes = Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 5, 4 � Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 1. ���'�--�'� Date: -72'196 Signature of technical specialist (Multiple worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET I. Farm number (identification) T 134 2 Field number (identification) 4 v,+ 6"'1g) 2. Irrigation system designation _ Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 115 feet] Length of pull(Ll) # Interior lanes x # Exterior lanes LI25 [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 33s [feet] from Field Data Worksheet WT--4 A = 2'7 I ' 5. Spacing tL4 Hydrant spacing [feet] '1 d [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 4 - [ Travel lane length (L-) _ Interior or X Exterior Gane/hydrant) 0 q F 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EF 70 Column /3 I.1 b (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) {Pull length31S [feet] X Wetted width 27 I [feet]]/43,560 Q 41 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table TF 7,; Column F 3, "1 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + C) 4 - 2. Travel lame length (L-) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant} ,r (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FF717 Column 2 •� 4 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull length`t25 [feet] X Wetted width 2'7 1 [feet]} / 43,560 I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table FT-70 Column F 3` Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or Exterior (lanejhydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length, (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3.2-9 (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) 7 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # lanes X 1 # Lanes X # Lanes = 3•' 29 Acres °I Acres Acres % 2& Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80 Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Signature of tecWcal specialist .•� �J Date: �- z2-0 d (Multiple workslheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET i34z 3 (YA Fr�) 1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification) 2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes 1 # Exterior lanes ►zG' feet] Length of pull(Ll) # interior lanes _ # Exterior lanes 4 VD -'[feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes 29 0 ' [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 _ [feet] from Field Data Worksheet W e. H+e A ,a,A-A,1,. = 2-71 ' S. Spacing Z- t-1 Q Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter} 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 3-1 Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or K Exterior (lane/hydrant) d, R ►5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E 70 Column g 0,15 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) (Pull lengthf Z,� [feet] X Wetted widtliZ-7 I [feet]) / 43,560 • ``� I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 0 Column _ E a $ Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, Interior or X Exterior Qane[hydrant) V - q 15 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E � � 0 Column 13 :- , ut_q (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LZ) {Pull length`fy [feet] X Wetted width 2-71 [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E�7D Column E 3 , �;, I Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L,) _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) y p G' �Z (a) Acres start end of pull from Table f Column J 1 B� (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) , [Pull lengthjq 0 [feet] X Wetted width Z_) [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table .&'7L?t Column E . b3 Total acres for -travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X # Lanes = Z,V 3 Acres $ I (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X 1 # Lanes = `r I Acres G` 3T (c) Acres per travel lame length (L3) X I # Lanes = , 0 3 Acres �& 9 Z Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: l/s- r�-- Date: 6' Z2'a6 Signature of technical specialist ;, 15 (Multiple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM l -rl Z "l l I N 1 ! F[ A 2. Irrigation system designation — Existing irrigation system _New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes , # Exterior lanes '665 feet] Length of pull(L1) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes "KT-5 [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(1-3) 4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet 5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants — Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L-) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0.575 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table r D Column 13 5,51 (la) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) (Pull lengthj2�5 [feet] X Wetted width Z-71 [feet]) / 43,560 ff D - Z-7 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N e Column E l� 3 to Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) t -2, Travel lane length (L_) Interior or Exterior gane/hydrant) 0 4 3S (a) Ades start end of pull from Table S & b Column 5, -SC (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull lengthTeS [feet] X Wetted width2-11 [feet] / 43,560 �Z 3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N I & D Column V ► 2 Q %Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) 1 _3 Travel lane length (L> A Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) 11 4; 535 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table N.i G 4 Column 6 112- "� 5f S ' (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 0, Z3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N:E % D Column 3. y g6 Total acres for travel Ian leng th (L (L3 ) ( Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3 ` (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X 1 # Lanes Acres . Z `d (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = 2_ Acres . 1 y (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X 1 # Lanes = 3, 1 `4 Acres 15 r -'l Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: aP C'�--- Date: 4.22•Pt Signature of technical specialist �1J (Ahdfiple worksheets may be neeried) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET }BARD HOSC TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) T J 3 S 3 Field number (identification) 10 (�NL r'S\A 2. Irrigation system designation _ Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes X # Exterior lanes 3W feet] Length of pull(L1) yZ 4,, v # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pul](L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 335- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet tirel"cil '.- 44t, = 2-71 ' 5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet) [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants Y Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel laze length (L_) ____ Interior or k Exterior (lane/hydrant) e f 2 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F 90.E Column 13 r 2. v (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) K alb {Pull length 3? [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Fla + Column F F,.li = 1•2-3 0.14' = f.b2 t 62 Total acres for travel lame length (U) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or �Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull length [feet) X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L,) Interior or Exterior (iane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet} X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (13) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 6 (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X I # Lanes =1,'b 2 Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres l � Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: /�� Date:' 2Z d 6 Signature of technical specialist 'lJ (Multiple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) T 1 3 S 3 Field number (identification) ! [ ( R-5- P-t 1 � 2. Irrigation system designation 'X Existing irrigation system —New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes P40 feet] Length of pull(LI ) 1 # Interior lanes 4 Exterior lanes 110 [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 33S [feet] from Field Data Worksheet ►Y 44A mid 0- 1 2'7/ ' 5. Spacing 2 0 O Hydrant spacing [feet] 60 [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull far the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L- X interior or _ Exterior (lane/hydrant) 11-,-1 d• 7 Z (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F 160 Column i3 Nalf 0.6 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) Tr ' P v [Pull length I10 [feet] X Wetted width 2-11 [feet]) 143,560 ©• 23 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 4'T G 0 Column 1 F'11 : 1,& 3 N.,1f = p. Y 2 d Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) d• 9 6 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F E 6 O a• T'7 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) Fill [Pull lengthl'10 [feet] X Wetted width 1--1 T4„s✓ a 3� (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table FF 60 2. 1 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_ Interior or _Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) jPun length [feet] X Wetted width (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table _ Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) Column 3 _ [feet}[ / 43,560 Column _ F Column [feet]) 143,560 Column 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. D, (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X I # Lanes - 012 Acres j (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X 1 # Lanes = 2 1 Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes - Acres 2- `f 2 Total CAWATP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 9�Date: (-'• 2 2- 6 Signature of technical specialist �1�i (Midliple taorkshceL% may be )tended) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSL TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) T 13 S 3 Field number (identification) ) Z (M i^l kl 1 2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system ,,_.^ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes k 4 Exterior lanes 5 40 feet] Length of pull(LI) y 4W v # Interior lanes 4 ExteIor lanes 0 [feet] Length of pull(L2) ,Q1 # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 335 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet vi4"''-4 �a+�` = 2'?i 5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter frorn the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or V Exterior (lane/hydrant) Q 92 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table yd+ Column 112 - I 3. 36 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) 14- 4 (Pull length SL4 [feet] X Wetted width 2'71 [feet]; 1 43,560 T%w'N 0-'41 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Flo * Column F F" tl = 4. S a WaI+ Z. 2. 30 2. 3y Total acres for travel lane length (Ll) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or XExterior (lane hydrant) 1-2 - i A (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column FhI� (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) C,'-c[e {Pull length 0 [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column • Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) Interior or TExterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sutra: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 1.310 (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X I # Lanes = 3 Acres 41 1 (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (1.3) X # Lanes = Acres 2°f Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80 Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 4r�"'� Date: G,L�-od Signature of technical specialist ?J Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures for Wastewater Application Equipment Table EE70. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Exterior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 70 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees _ (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Q (G) 150 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.13 0.15 160 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.17 170 0.24 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.19 180 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.22 190 0.29 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.21 0.24 200 0,33 0.00 0.07 0.15 0.24 0.27 210 0.36 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.26 0.29 220 0.40 0.00 0.08 0.19 0.29 0,32; 230 0.43 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.31 0.35 240 0.47 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.34 0,38 250 0.51 0.00 0,11 0.23 0.37 0.42 260 0.55 0.00 0.12 0.25 0.40 0.45 270 0.60 0.00 0.12 0.27 0.43 0.49 280 0.64 0.00 0.13 0.29 0.46 0.52 290 0.69 0.00 0.14 0.31 0.50 0.56 300 0.74 0.00 0.15 0.33 0,53 0.60 310 0.78 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.57 0.64 320 0.84 0.00 0.18 0.37 0.61 0.68 3 37 /330 0.89 q is 0.00 0.19 0.40 I 0.64 0.73 340 0.94 0.00 0.20 0.42 0.68 0.77 350 1.00 0.00 0.21 0.45 0.72 0.82 360 1.06 0.00 0.22 0.47 0.77 0.86 370 1.12 0.00 0.23 0.50 0.81 0.91 380 1.18 0.00 0.25 0.53 0.85 0.96 390 1.24 0.00 0.26 0.56 0.90 1.01 400 1.31 0.00 0.27 0.59 0.95 1.07 410 1.37 0.00 0.29 0.62 0.99 1.12 420 1.44 0.00 0.30 0.65 1.04 1.18 430 1.51 0.00 0,32 0.68 1.09 1.23 440 1.58 0.00 0.33 0.71 450 1.65 0.00 - 0.35 0.74 1.20 1.35 460 1.73 0.00 0.36 0.77 1.25 1.41 470 1,.80 0.00 0.38 0.81 1.31 1.47 480 1.68 0.00 0.39 0.84 1.36 1,54 490 1.96 0.00 0.41 0.88 1.42 1.60 500 2.04 0.00 0.43 0.91 1.48 1.67 HARD Host- TRAVELER lRR1GATION SYSTEM Table E170. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Interior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 70 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) (B) (C) (D) _ Q (E _(G) 150 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.06 0,11 0.13 160 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.15 170 0.21 0.00 0,03 0.08 0.15 0.17 180 0.24 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.16 0.19 190 0.26 0.00 0.04 0.10 0,18 0.21 200 _ 0,29_ 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.20 0.23 210 0.32 0.00 0.05 0.12 0,22 0.26 220 0.35 0,00 0.06 0.14 0.25 0.28 230 0.39 0,00 0.06 0115 0.27 0.31 240 0.42 0_00 0A7 0.16 0.29 250 0.46 0.00 0.07 _ _ 0.18 0.32 _0.34_ 0.36 260 0,49 0,00 0.08 0.19 0.34 0.39 270 0.53 0,00 0.08 0.20 0.37 0.42 280 0.57 0.00 0.09 0.22 0.40 0.46 290 0.62 0.00 0,10 0.24 0.43 0.49 300 0.66 0,00 0,10 0,25 0.46 0.52 310 0.70 0,00 0.11 0.27 0.49 0.56 320 0.75 0.00 0.12 0.29 0.57 0,60 33S /330 340 0.90 035 0.00 0.00 0,13 0.13 0.31'\Bp 032 J �� 0.55 0.59 0.63 0.67 350 0.90 0.00 0.14 0.34 0,62 0.71 360 0.95 0.00 0,15 0.36 0.66 0.75 370 1.00 0,00 0,16 0.38 0.69 0.80 380 1.06 0,00 0,17 0.41 0.73 0.84 390 1.11^� 0.00 0.18 0.43 0.77 0.88 400 _ 1.17 _ 0.00 0.19 _ 0.45 _ 0.81 ^ 0.93 410 1.23 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.85 0.96 420 1.29 0.00 0.21 0.50 0.89 1.03 430 1.35 0,00 0.22 0.52 0.94 1,08 440 1.42 0.00 0.23 0.54 0.98 1.13 450 1,48 0.00 0.24 0.57 1.03 1,18 460 1.55 0.00 0.25 0.59 1.07 1,23 470 1.62 0.00 0.26 0.62 1.12 1.28 480 1.69 0.00 0.27 0.65 1.17 1.34 490 1.76 0.00 0.28 0.68 1.22 1,40 S00 1,83 0,00 0.29 0.70 1.27 1.45 Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures for Wastewater Application Equipment Table E90+. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Fields with single pull or multiple pulls and Hydrant spacing greater than 90 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area ; - arc angle �180 arc angle arc angle w arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) {B) {�) (D) {) (F) {�) 150 0.16 0,00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.14 160 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.09 0,14 0.16 170 021 0.00 OM 0.11 0.16 0.18 180 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.20 190 0,26 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.22 200 0.29 0.00 0.07 OAS 0.22 0.24 210 0.32 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.27 220 0.35 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.27 029 230 0.39 0.00 0.10 0.19 0.29 0.32 240 0.42 0.00 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.35 250 0.46 0.00 0.11 0.23 0.34 0.38 260 0.49 0.00 0.12 0.25 0.37 0,41 270 0.53 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.40 0.44 280 0.57 0.00 0.14 0.29 0,43 0.48 290 0.61 0.00 0.15 0.31 0.46 0.51 300 0.66 0.00 0.16 0.33 0.49 0.55 310 0.70 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.53 0.58 320 0.75 0.00 0.19 0.37 0.56 0.62 S /330 0.80) a �.� 0.00 0.20 0.40� C y ` 0.60 0.66 \ 340 0.64 0.00 0.21 0.42 0.63 0.70 350 0.89 0.00 0.22 0.45 0.67 0.75 360 0.95 0.00 0.24 0.47 0.71 0.79 370 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.SO 0.75 0,83 380 1.05 0.00 0.26 0.53 0.79 0.88 390 1.11 0.00 0.28 0.56 0,83 0.93 400 1.17 0,00 0.29 0.58 0,88 0.97 410 1.23 0.00 0,31 0.61 0.92 1.02 420 1.29 0.00 0.32 0.64 0.97 1.07 430 1,35 OAO 0.34 0.68 1.01 1.13 440 1,41 0.35 0.71 1.06 1.18 45O 1.48 _0.00 0.00 0.37 w 0.74 1.11 1.23 460 1.55 0.00 0.39 0,77 1.16 1.29 470. 1.61 0.00 OA0 0.81 1.21 1.34 480 1.69 0.00 0.42 0.84 1.26 1.40 490 1.75 0.00 0.44 0.88 1.32 1.46 Soo 1.83 0.00 0.46 0.91 1.37 1.52 30) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Table N160. Area Allowances for New or Expanded Hard Hose Traveler Systems Interior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 60 percent of wetted diameter (Acreage is outside' starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees --- (A) (B)Y (C)- ,. (D).... _.(E) _ (F) (G) 150 0.11 0.00 0.02 6,05 0.08 0.09 160 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.10 170 0.14 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.10 0,11 180 0.15 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.11 0.13 190 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.14 200 0.19 0.00 G.03 0.08 0.14 0.15 210 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.17 220 0.23 0.00 0,04 0.10 0.17 0.19 230 0.25 0.GO 0.05 0.11 0,18 0.20 24D 0.28 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.20 0.22 250 0.30 0.00 US 0.13 0.21 0.24 260 0.32 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.23 0.26 270 0.35 0.00 0.06 0.15 0.25 0.28 280 0.37 0.00 0.07 0.16 0.27 0.30 290 0.40 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.29. 0.33 300 0.43 0.00 0.08 0,18 0.31 0.35 310 0.46 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.33 0.37 320 0.49 0.00 0.09 0.21 0.35 0,40 J /330 0.52> 5 S 0-00 0.09 0,22� C, 2-3 0,37 0.42 `340 0,55 0.00 0.10 0.24 0.39 0.45 350 0.59 0.00 0.10 0.25 0.42 0.47 360 0.62 0.00 0.11 G.26 0.44 0.50 370 0.65 0.00 0.12 0.28 0.47 0.53 380 0.69 0.00 0.12 0.29 0.49 0.56 390 0.73 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.52 0.59 400 0,76 0.00 0.14 0.33 0.55 0.62 410 0.80 0.00 0.14 0.34 0.57 0.65 420 0.84 0.00 0.15 G.36 0,60 0.68 430 0.88 0.00 0.16 0.38 0.63 0.71 440 0.93 0.00 0.17 0,39 "' ,---0 56 - --- 0,75 ' 450 0.97 0,00 0.17 0.41 0.69 0,78 460 1.01 0.00 0.18 0.43 0.72 0.82 470 1.06 0.00 0.19 0,45 0.75 0.85 480 2.10 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.79 0.89 490 1.15 0.00 0.21 0,49 0.82 0.93 500 1.20 0.00 021 0.51 0.85 0.97 35, HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Table NE60. Area Allowances for New or Expanded Hard Hose Traveler Systems Exterior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 60 percent of wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees 150 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.09 160 0.13 0,00 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.11 170 0.15 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.11 0.12 180 0.17 0.00 0,04 0.08 0.12 0.14 190 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.09 _ 0._14 0.15 200 0.21 0,00 0.04 0,10 0.15 0.17 210 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.19 220 0.25 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.18 0.20 230 0.27 0.00 0,06 0.13 0.20 0.22 240 0.30 0.00 0.14 0.22 0.24 250 0.32 _ 0.00 T~ _0.06 0.07 T 0.15 0.24 0.26 260 0.35 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.25 0.29 270 0.37 0.00 0.08 0.17 0.27 0.31 280 0.40 0,00 0.09 0.19 0.29 0.33 290 0.43 0.00 0.09 0.20 0.32 0,35 300 0,46 0.00 0.10 0.22 0.34 0.38 310 0.49 0.00 0.11 0.23 0.36 0.41 320 0.53 0.00 0,11 0,24 0.39 0.43 �'330 0.56� C .� 7 0.00 0.12 0.26� d.'�-r 0.41 0A6 340 0.59 0.00 0,13 0,28 0.43 0.49 350 0.63 0.00 0.14 0.29 0.46 0.52 360 0.67 0.00 0.14 0.31 0.49 0.55 370 0.70 0.00 0.1s 0.33 0.51 0.59 380 0.74 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.54 0.61 390 0,78 0.00 0,17 0.36 0.57 0.64 400 0.82 0,00 0.18 0.38 0.60 0,68 410 0.86 0,00 0.19 0.40 0.63 0.71 420 0.91 0.00 0.20 0.42 0.66 0.74 430 0.95 0.00 0.21 0.44 0.70 0.78 440 0,99 0,00 0.22 0.46 0.73 0.62 450 1.04 0.00 0.23 0.48 0.76 0,85 460 1.09 0.00 0.24 0,51 0.80 0.89 470 1.13 0.00 0.25 0.53 0.83 0.93 490 1,18 0.00 0.26 0.55 0.97 0.97 490 1.23 0.00 0,27 0.57 0.90 1.01 500 1.28 0,00 0.28 0.60 0.94 1.05 Arthur Holt King -- Wettable Acres Summary VA Fields - These fields will not be included if the farm is sold. Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1339 1-1 6.68 1-2 5.99 1-3 2.99 15.66 1339 2-1 1.50 2-2 4.57 6.07 1342 3-1 2.08 3-2 3.81 3-3 3.03 8.92 1342 4-1 —2-3e- 3 i� 4-2 a-&3- 1342 5-1 5.46 5.46 1342 6-1 4.75 6-2 4.75 9.50 1342 8-1 3.66 3.66 1342 9-1 5.58 0.0a 1 f'CZ r, -� M Arthur Holt King -- Wettable Acres Summary (pg2) These fields will be included if the farm is sold. "New VA Field Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1341 1-1 6.36 1-2 6.28 1-3 3.14 NC Fields Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1353 10-1 -4-� 1, 61 1353 11-1 -Z760- Q.BZ II-2 2., C 1353 12-1 .1-R 3.21 Total Wetted Acres available if farm is sold = 15.78 MN 3.11+-5-2/I c� G l OR I GIRRU Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization This plan has been prepared for: King Farin Arthur Halt King 977 Paschall Station Rd Warrenton, NC 27589 252-456-43 77 06-27-2006 This plan has been developed by: Larry West Warren SWCD 820 US Hwy 158 Bus. W Suite 102 Warrenton, NC 27589 (252) 257-3836 Developer S Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal waste management'that are included with this plan. Signature (owner) Date Signature (manager or pro ucer) Hate This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Plan.Approved By: Technical Specialist i tare Date { .............. .......------------------- -------------------.....---..-...-----------------------......................--- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Cover Page 1 RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ AQl11FFR-PR0TF(,TlnN SECTION MAR 18 2009 Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following sou rce(s): Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan. S1 1 Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 1,930,500 gals/year by a 500 animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 2979 Incorporated 5116 Injected 5634 Irrigated 3238 Max. Avail. PAN (Ibs) * Actual PAN Applied (lbs) PAN Surplus/ Deficit (lbs) Actual Volume applied (Gallons) Volume Surplus/ Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 3,238 20284 -17,046 12,093,203 -10,162,703 Year 2 3,238 20113 -16,875 11,991,206 -10,060,706 Note: In source Ip, S means standard source, U means user defined source. * Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Source Page Page 1 of I Narrative There are four (4) tracts of land on this farm that are used for spray fields to accomendate the waste generated from the 500 sow farrow to feeder operation located on site. Three (3) of the tracts of land on this farm are located entirely in the state of Virginia but administrated through the Warren County, North Carolina Farm Service Agency (FSA). Land own er,lproducer Arthur Holt King asked for our office to devlope a NMP to reflect all acres on all four of his tracts of land. In this NMP the Virginia tracts are identified the letters VA in front of the tract number, the North Carolina tract is identified solely numeric manner, The tract listed as VA1341 was enlarged by the owner in the Fall of 2005 that increased total wettable acres to 15.7 as documented by Division of Soil & Water Enviromental Engineer Carl Dunn from the Washington, NC office. All cropland on each tract have been evaluated and wettable acres have been determined. The individual fields listed in the NMP are now actual irrigation pulls, thus the field acreage listed for each sub -field is the wettable acreage for each pull. The plan is based on pulls instead of fields for more ease of record keeping. .......................................................................................................................... ............................. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1 7,e table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available. If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High. Planned Crops Summary Tract Field Total Acres useable Acres Plat Rating g LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE P205 Removal (lbs/acre) Applied (lbs/acre) 1353 10-1 1.62 1.62 Low NIA Wedowee Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 46 NIA 1353 1 I 1-1 0.821 0.82 Low N/A Wedowee Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 46 N/A 1353 1 1-2 2.1 2.10 Low 1.0 Wedowee Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 46 NIA 1353 12-1 3.29 3.29 Medium NIA Wedowee Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 39 hu. 31 N/A Corn, Grain 108 bu. N/A NIA VA1339 1-1 6.68 6.68 Low I NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 N/A VA1339 1-2 5.99 5.99 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 N/A VA1339 1-3 2.99 2.99 Low N/A Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 N/A VA 1339 2-1 1.50 1.50 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A VA1339 2-2 4,57 4.57 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A VA1341 1-1 6.36 6.36 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5A Tons NIA N/A VA 1341 1-2 6.28 6.28 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons N/A N/A VA1341 1-3 3.14 3,14 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons NIA NIA VA 1342 13-1 1.50 1.50 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A VA1342 3-1 2.08 2.08 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 85 N/A VA1342 3-2 3.81 3,81 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A VA 1342 3-3 3.03 3.03 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 85 NIA VA1342 4-1 3.29 3,29 Low N/A Appling Hybrid Berniudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 4-2 3,97 3.97 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 5-1 5.46 5,46 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 6-1 4,75 4.75 Low N/A Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 6-2 4.75 4.75 Low N/A Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 8-1 3.66 3.66 Low N/A Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA VA1342 9-1 5.58 5.58 Low N1A Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A PLAN TOTALS: 87.22 87,22 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 PCS Page Page 1 of 2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance Low potential to contribute to soluble None 2 nutrient leaching below the root zone. >_ 2 & Moderate potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. <= 10 nutrient leaching below the root zone. Nigh potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils nutrient leaching below the root zone. available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples > l0 are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -'rill (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391). PLAT Index Rating P Management Recommendation 0 - 25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application 25 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application 51 - 100 ] ligh Application limited to crop P removal > 100 Very High Starter P application only 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 PCS Page Page 2 of 2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland ,,eeded to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbs1A) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res, (lbs/A) Applic. Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbslA) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1353 10-1 SI I Wedowee 1.62 1.62 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 811-7131 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 124.59 0.00 1353 I 1-1 SI I Wedowee 0.82 0.82 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 811-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 63.06 0.00 1353 11-2 Sill Wedowee 2.10 2.10 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7131 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 161.51 0.00 1353 12-1 Sl i Wedowee 3.29 3.29 Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 39 bu. 4/1-9115 152 0 0 brig. 152 90.62 0.00 298.141 0.00 VA1339 1-1 SI1 Appling 6.68 6.68 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 311-9130 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 971.73 0.0Q VA1339 1-2 S l 1 Appling 5.99 5.99 Hybrid Bertnudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 311-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 871.35 0.00 VA1339 1-3 S11 Appling 2.99 2.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 311-9130 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 434.95 0.00 VA1339 2-1 S11 Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 218.20 0.00 VA1339 2-2 S11 Appling 4.57 4.57 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 664.791 0.00 VA1341 1-1 S11 Appling 6.36 6.36 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7131 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 910.01 0.00 VA1341 1-2 SI 1 Appling 6.28 6.28 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 Q.00 898.56 0.00 VA1341 1-3 Sl l Appling 3.14 3.14 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7131 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 Q 001 449.28 0.00 VA1342 13-1 S11 Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 218.20 0.00 VA1342 3-1 S1 I Appling 2,08 2.08 Fescue Hay 5A Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 297.61 0.00 VA1342 3-2 Sl l Appling 3.81 3.81 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 554.23 0.00 VA1342 3-3 S11 Appling 3.03 3.03 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7131 240 1 0 0 Irrig.T 240 143.08 0-00 433.54 0.00 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 1 of 4 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE APplic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbslA) Comm. Pert. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (lbs1A) Applic. Method Manure PA NutnentA pplied (lbs1A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons VA1342 4-1 Sl l Appling 3.29 3.29 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 470.74 0.00 VA1342 4-2 S11 Appling 3.97 3.97 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 568.04 0.00 VA1342 5-1 S11 Appling 1 5.46 5.46 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 311-9/30 240 0 0 brig. 24C 143.08 0.00 781.24 0.00 VA1342 6-1 Sl 1 Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tans 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 6-2 S11 Appling 4,75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9l30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 8-1 Sl ] Appling 3.66 3,66 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 532.41 0.00 VA1342 9-1 S11 Appling 5.58 5.58 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.471 0.00 811.71 0.00 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 12,093.20 ,__ .�__.- ��, Es Total Produced, 1000 gallons 1,930.50 Balance, 1000 gallons -10, I 62.70 7 . Total Applied, tans --ma- - - ;� ;> 0.00 Total Produced, tons` .• rz; o•: 0.00 Balance, tons-'w 0.00 Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 2 of 4 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutnent Req'd (lbs/A) Comm. Fert, Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (lbs/A) App€ic. Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbs/A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gai/A Tons i000 gals tons 1353 10-1 Sl l Wedowee 1.62 1.62 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7131 129 0 0 Irrig, 129 76.91 MO 124.59 OM 1353 11-1 S11 Wedowee 0.82 0.82 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 63.06 0.00 1353 1 I-2 S11 Wedowee 2.I0 2.10 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 brig. 129 76.91 0.00 161.51 0.00 1353 12-1 S11 Wedowee 3.29 3.29 Corn, Grain 108 bu. 2/15-6/30 120 0 20 Irrig. 100 59.62 0.00 196.141 0.00 VA1339 1-1 S11 Appling 6.68 6.68 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 311-9130 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 971.73 0.00 VA1339 1-2 SI I Appling 5.99 5,99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145,47 0.00 871.35 0.00 VA1339 1-3 Sit Appling 2.99 2.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 311-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 434.95 0,00 VA1339 2-1 S l I Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 21810 0.00 VA1339 2-2 S11 Appling 4.57 4.57 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145,47 0-00 664.79 0.00 VA1341 1-1 S11 Appling 6.36 6.36 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 910.01 0,00 VA1341 1-2 SI 1 Appling 6.28 6,28 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 14108 OAO 898.56 0.00 VA1341 1-3 S1I jAppling 3.14 3.14 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig, 240 143.08 OM 449.28 0.00 VA1342 13-1 SI l Appling L50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 21&20 0.00 VA1342 3-1 S11 Appling 2.08 2,081 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 297.61 0.00 VA1342 3-2 SI1 Appling 3.81 3.81 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 554.23 0.00 VA1342 3-3 Si 1 Appling 3.03 3.03 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 433.54 0.00 VA1342 4-1 S l 1 Appling 3.29 3.29 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 470.741 OM VA1342 4-2 Si 1 Appling 3.97 3.97 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9130 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 568.04 0.00 VA1342 5-1 S11 Appling 5.46 5.46 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9130 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 781.24 0.00 VA1342 6-1 S11 Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.001 679.65i 0.00 VA1342 6-2 S1 I Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5A Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VAi342 8-1 SI1 Appling 3.66 3,66 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/3I 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 53141 0.00 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 3 of 4 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gaUA Tons 1000 gals tons VA1342 9 1 1 Sit Appling 5.58 5.58 Fescae Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 811.71 0.00 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 11,991.21 Total Produced, 1000 gallons 1.930.50 Balance, I000 gallons -10,060.71 g s� - Total Applied, tons 0.00 Total Produced, tons Mr Y T_ 0.00 Balance, tons Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 4 of 4 The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application event. Irrigation Application Factors Tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (inches/hour) Application Amount (inches) 1353 10-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 I1-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 1 1-2 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 12-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 2-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 2-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1341 1-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 13-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 3-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 3-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 3-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 4-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 4-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 5-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 6-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 6-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 8-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 1 9-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 IAF Page Page I of 1 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified. The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen. Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 1353 10-1 Req'd Nutrients 129 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.62 8/]-7/3l Supplied By: I..jtia „ _ s �l ary tr i tu'A x. :' t`r,•6iur�".'°i IfiIsu.s CROP Fescue Hay Starler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Wedowee Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Date 2.9 Tons 04-16-06 Manure 129 69 176 16 1 3 1 0 l Rating 46 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 69 146 16 1 3 1 0 RRYEmple Field VA1342 4.1 Req'd Nutrients 240 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 pp. Period 3.29 311-9130 5u kiwi By: PpLuti, r,n: i -ll .-•.,... :!; 1;41M �:�n,?�,:w ,.,"-r•rr .. ,..- ;-fir, ,...;,,�;a, CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 5.4 Tons 1 04-16-06 Manure 240 128 328 29 1 5 1 0 P Removal IRating 66 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 128 278 29 1 5 1 0 Tract Field VA1342 6-2 Req'd Nutrients 240 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.75 3/1-9/30 Supplied By.x.,..:u. i•k E1 1t, t'I€>+ i ±o�+it k �4 CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.4 Tons 104-16-06 Manure 2401 1281 328 291 1 1 51 k 0 P Removal Rating 1 66 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 1 0 128 318 29 k 1 5 1 1 0 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 NMR Page Page 1 of I The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbslacre by 0.036 and 0.07I, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal. In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production . Required Soil Test Values "tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation 1353 10-1 Fescue Hay 6-0 0.0 51 None 76 None VA1342 4-1 Hybrid Bertnudagrass Hay 6.4 0.0 80 None 248 None VA1342 6-2 1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 1 6.6 1 0.0 76 None 1 278 None -------------------------------------------- -----•---------...------.....------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- --------...--------------------------- -------------------------- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 STY Page Page I of I The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column. Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied. Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application, Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern. Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table Crop Maximum PA-N Rate lb/ac Maximum Sludge Application Rate 1000 gallac Minimum Acres 5 Years Accumulation Minimum Acres 10 Years Accumulation Minimum Acres 15 Years Accumulation Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard Corn 120 bu 150 13.16 17.85 35.71 53.56 Hay 6 ton R.Y.E. 300 26,32 8.93 17.85 26.78 Soybean 40 bu 160 14,04 16,74 33.48 50.22 .................. .......... .............................--..................----................................................. .---- .._.............-....... --- ..... 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Sludge Page Page 1 of The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero, Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste Storage Capacity Source Name I Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid Design Storage Capacity (Days) Stan Date 9/ 1 180 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity (Days) 1 1 149 1 2 180 1 3 180 1 4 180 1 5 180 1 6 180 1 7 180 1 8 180 1 9 180 1 10 180 1 11 180 1 12 149 2 1 118 2 2 180 2 3 180 2 4 180 2 5 180 2 6 180 2 7 180 2 8 180 2 9 180 2 10 180 2 11 180 2 12 149 * Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month, ---------- -- --------------------------------------------------------------- ----............. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Capacity Page Page I of 1 Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application,.or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. Z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------...--------------...-.....-..-------------------------....--.---.. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Pape 1 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. --------------------------------------- ------------------------- -............. --------- ....... ............................................. -- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Page 2 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. .. ...... ---------........ --- -- --- - 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Pape 3 Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): 12-1 Corn Piedmont In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting, When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 Ibs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-1, 6-1, 6-2 Bermudagrass: Piedmont Adaptation: Moderate to Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3" deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Winter -kill is a frequent problem in the Upper Piedmont; Coastal is not adapted there. Tifton 44 is the most cold -hardy cultivar. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. ----------- --------- ....................... -------- ---------------------.......... --.................................... ............................ 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2 The following crop note applies to field(s): 10-1, 1-1, 11-1, 11-2, 1-2, 1-3, 13-1, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 8-1, 9-1 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 12-1 Soybeans -Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2 s}�":', �'rr � �„ r � , �' 1 - c��YTr �r f.. �;t,�fi � d '� �+K rod � s,? 7„fr .u'• _, vp ,a #ice � t �" �'' F•.. x - p;,; ,A r'w��rs� _ _ Y�..1 ,��•}„� � 's � t 41 3����F��`,y�.3- rYtL2 � �i O-Q, I,� ,,,rz. r p y \4e Y' ,iii•✓p��yraf : r��- x� �.+�xe r�'�„r, ` "{ x �''�. L, 'owl•y J y, • 1y'�.�,... -1 r r �b�� �wrk�k�� �/;b� 'r .ri�� a .r , ��� l�i'�F Y,� �Mf4lI`���1 ���gI'�'� 4 r f 1 >✓' > ✓'x rta p.r, r r r - .4- sp ,,��y4.AG tt F r.• .t,i i+,... i1�^A' WIM ` ,w ^'� � � :.r`�y �i x•raF �i �.^r,'S [� 'f � is"C .E ,t� dr µ, ��II •'"i�! r -e'i; et' gr'"�' :i,Y +(/ ® 'a,xfr +rrx, °...r,�;#A-i`� � �.� � yea � ���C� � �Y7 �} 7 h ' �' # r [x - }, 4;� � �!.'s{ i5'Y �,y„ x�aY � �•� ��� i riY°t•+.r....... . �a�r.•,••.s .. • _ •�_--�,-�. ����`A f�„Y �' en r r .� i F `' � t h . ¢?. ��" '.,�� J%S. - `�_� _ _ i . I F �. _� ,'`—.�.^yF"rt..• . ,t`^. r73".1^ �.�.L , _'• .�v'� _ -. �.:rs. �:�� 'd' _ y ^a�1 � �� lr� L t7a '? �✓ r "=Y p ya a• 'lk,arP'F �rl: 5 1 ' r *I \ ti r: r � :i: � ��J.}.r�,. r � • '.jr �� j � t}` •ar �' r � �{ ' < Fr s. Lm- ..� •-{'rSdyst \{�i,,e_f'%r; rf',i.>e: x-r .: ��R�a �� "+ ;f`� 3ok -"_ `�N�r � � ;5t :r�� +Sy �� ,i��i { � "q T' 4 � 1�y1�Ji' 'Y"_ ST.'{�.Y •�'j '�, 'C ,�yyV •'4,41-kol ;,y.`�A rw"ydj•u�Y-�-3 r s+. �•'1• e. iif - '.4'' •rr.'. r.><,r,ar .i ssH Sy'' o.:'k w .l y •, '^�rK,t i r � �t��i � � � ,y''�•,° r `� i td •,Ys + � �rfi f���.� .,� � rx• .v. p k��;'r�.ht�� ? +� �� �` ,� � � r`�'�" �'L���'(,z,�4;� � �'� �' � tr s� ` ,s �-�� rx�' �,.9i` j xrs��•, � L•.,¢� � i�,.a _ `�t�i� 4i Y?,,r.�`.r ��.. s� n ,� �„ r- a !' +�" =4° �,�r � ".,r�;: rk�tlxy�`'i}`�' � "' } +��y ' •'$ �"' � '�-+.- ,� � � ^Ta�,� 3 F i � .{, s'" .n ;�:�7�',�•�,.r,..:� - - .., ��.. e-, +4 �Y t d� �.,a�.s�'"�� s �A s '4.!. y � >• �'�`a'i'lf��..�[1. ,' �y�.r .�f,� -. Y�4�J{�^ b' j �� � �r� �� a �s�; «A,t�d �uYi�.�,?�i l+ �i'`.•.. � se �� -� � r.�•� � a 3' •S�- �WI �` � ^�.",t� t 47. � .r r ,fr��rL � Tr;p�a �f s? - ,� :, � O �'�.' O'"7'ai � ..f e f a q }y wi' "'Y�ra. •'r`"'.,s�� t �' a Y g� r i _ ?i f� � Kac� !�p � 'tlL A _ I ate, R .L ! '1 _ i ,•'L, V n - .< Y J"..tr �j3' `'`E _ �v ^ � � tf ° '� �:� L? _ ,� � �-" ^ie 't„ �r� �.t.- : ,�M � � i'� � G � r, y •r 'tx � _ ' �3 >, "r�r�.=.��� s �, �i9• r.. q. ,�} '. 1�i '.#�`{"a.,�,'. �wi � � �f.A � --� d � r } k ^�•• li - .. ,y'�f,4�; zk �� ����[ d !!' 1tL'YArff � { ,� "'_ � db �,i„��3"'�j� fit. � h �� .r y + . i f i• 7 + � � �� � R {�T � i�. aaii� �a , i-$�"�"Y.]•� �� � _ � "ar �,�f"' a rY�' �.. +.; i -t- dc�r` 1 i' a � u 't' ,K. j� M �. �`��y. ,- fig' � ��r'n;• a s `e"�,'?a 'p''� � iter s sue" _�, i t��- + '^��tik '{ t • ? wd ., .�tyM1K:'.�+.,yk[. C�S t� �J t.��n �i� � ,t. �.�sr�,iq�3 ,� , r �y:�p � • r a' � Y,� R�• f� �;c ',• .�,'` -tin. VM Y L•''" `i �'F,�` wR �i,+*y 1 y� rr •- 7 R I�r'�y�1 h, �,��'_ C t�'�''�tii'� Y f p � - fil�i i" - ftdk aJ i' C'�' yell ,�r, K ? K �� r ! �.�"� ,� f�7w r e�5�'� '� ��' w` r��rdtir � , ;u�;y f..z.:.,�, xT•_ a fa' ,M 1 Soil Legend for Arthur Holt King North Carolina mapped soils 71B Wedowee 61B Wake -Louisburg -Saw complex Virginia mapped soils AaB, ApC, ApB is mapped as Appling WdD, Wob is mapped as Wedowee ILr . Y '* R ` li'' v1 Fg a i • k .L' .. ; Lu `�`y� ,�;,r1��*%'�.•`'r��4�' — � . � fi ! ! E {1�Y T � \.•��r14,rr.�rr +*'. 1f�,� M�'•.-A�•: ^�. 'P`a, 1 O le ter, Ar j <., tie!' ���+. �v.r• , �"e'af. �� . ; ��.-�`' � }r. }�r'.Fes/ �'�j�"'►?;•a_. fy � i. '� 4:1: •{� -fzl0K)F,� ":VV t�s ('• ,,,: j !�. 11 ,� �, ':'? •�I`•3 ' r•Y -L'' i- yfi", e•,�Y} 3"' rr "�+ +�Mr {r 5 '► +Z sr}r( '' y QS'` , 1rr s f .r. x• - <: ; t C L�r.l _ i� / _.+r' i � �-' SS •tr � �+-ti;. ' "� _s;� 'r t+`{{r7 f�ii�r � �' ' ..�� rq , Ali, ice` '�'r r e� � �i+�`?k .L� .{rrl �r�+�ri_�-.��?i�'.!'� �^'y,. �� y{s�Y A� '�-'f�l � °' -'• 1r ky „1 :�, �yi;�l. -.r-�`�." �y+R.vim •w` -��,: �2 iJ'r�• �.sTI'F'rll[,`Itll�ti 3;�ky +4:3 �` c�� v. B!+ 4 � i Y� K�. 3 °., '�4 •<'r7 , .•+i+1�','��L [I �F'�F ii•. �.f,; 7�.i:�`�` jK k�r� s# Fr• 'may,"' '`ry.. 1 r' Zu; - i 77 a.:� I(� n _ +l.�.r•- y x+ems r J p��, yr , M� , ~ w� }Yf L� TAC s -'tit j-i►r �, '4 �-�f+ V.E�+L i�� � L �/ � •'< � `�� � .. •i �i#yr�• t,��4�fF,f"�s: .��k��jli7 1 � 5��x?cv c a' Tj. j� ��r _ .: �'�� !r �•` �1 ;�•;'r-Allr��.s , r 1 r'}r i IV. •,tr "+'f"fr f+a._ Jy1'f .a31n� �i -t, �• - "`3T }}* ��� '3 J-1 (ems, 4�t� »T ?K -.. - } .Ar•,r t' `=• `a �:p', �r � {'. • dr .rj'"x�' r�/• i %pi •.� ��� "'�f {�r •+�� : k; �� � 15-� S° 'J 'i + � � i -y i f�xA"' '?,S� �''y SJE.-r '':}w�i•✓.,��' �� ;��+,� !� �++ air r a`, ;iY�t S2, � tY�i�.K« a'�'-•.:ra�^I� � r �y' i. Zn..,, Y'.,.x^ � v 1��,. ,. �� i' � � 7. 1•'i-� r,�3•• �r. '•r7•..�' '�y� �.:.. F•:7' 1�."i+ i �,4, raq •rya+=��in :�•���F,�:SY-^�r'-�.i� `d ' 1�A r r 'L;y` .�!L � g'' ��•r � � ��'w dl.M^ iPrr' ' • i /r j�ti� • '" ' E: ��,. f : S;'•}��: `T�ri F{� �^i,�r', -yt� �f y " ;'9 �`,�,r�,��wr•�r y nr.�u C.k �� 3 �•r�'j + .r '�'`' t- +�`I� r 'if rc.y, '- `t• '�i' ♦ L,- h` _i „ff` Q a �!, ia'.�M ti, v:lF kL i A+ • i • 7 tf I1: •sr '� e+t', ft-7:�+ ;( `-yT4r���" V4 a'C'i�a •ta%' � r_.;T!fx`t•Y.�`�"� � �'; *i' q>Ib��+,+k )i+f�2 r, � t �_ 'iy._ "+d�'"L"�"-.Rt,' a-•�.,rll a 1-{r+?t�.. '- -„ rt ��'L `--r- '°'�j }+3`R y ��;,, �,; a •+ . S i 0 4� '�� " « ��Sf� `�: 5� '1. I J •ram+, � + � ``{ C'� I� . , • .sir «L� ���. '� �fev'� ..,t� '' ^ 4%*JF [ ;ii'Y..+rs"-v'� i5s "�C .A�i✓r�" ) ��; � j�# J.i...r r rr+ ,•yr-_r .c• } { `''3y�'�r.-11ay,-\ -... ��`'a.•�., ..i' h ,%h���.-t'. - � 4 �i ,`s' ~ t• "+M�,,�•�` T t�i'+ � .. "•k� 1 ,. � t.>r � }r �F-+ {"�3,�! ? r .r ".s E i, '�:,° +• �. '.• '�S !Z 7f 1«++i� r.r= •�dP•;`. r F._, w rt`,•' - t �•., 1 +1� 4 ' ' ,7s A 'i:J°E 7-��. .y'£'rh v's. l�� t �'+:. J 9 F H� - �*'rL.+l�J" \'9 `,%. `�' a.�. FVr,r F. f T,.r w R, , w S •+r ,:, +/ �'sl f,.•�7`.\^"1�L��-.,, i � wE,. �"�aY-�:.1i1 s s� -'N�•' �`��i i. 'E�'.�"y �� ,sf i,r'� +� ':•T� �hs`\';y. .l 1 •G� ra�tt.-{+ +:. f:'-.a-gyp W<•'�Y�i �;` +�'g�` +�,! >� -:{.. M r•`-?jf,J�,l�r'"''��.Rr'+:C'-R,�+}���/�1`�+�'�-f!»�+ "rt:� Y • ; iY.r. �;+-t+�ti .'f� � w �r'' Z , F •. lljjh-T.'�`r'' 1 f. �..>� � �a�� � � - lS n n � 'r�'tt r �'�: zl C.,� �'��l+�j3i!�' t' �. �• �i7-•,T'e�..r'1 ,'� f r.�'.i` r? s5't, dr rY r 1 �.1a• �` �irL�<� �rs ttrl E tr' Al !Y r '� I 1 `� �� ��g! f/fY�i �"�. .L...�.\y ,�y l •• FL S`_. A "ti; '+' , •• \ '�� -y' J - f,It r� '# �• rr,5ias'rJS f. •! :a`j'=mil �' �z rG ,� a ..d'',st�•: 3E ��r .s�'t� ,��r• +?2..,�i e::��..��g�•i,�� .i�'��.�e' i 1 �rxyMyy�4 7-4'^+a.•Y;�; '\"=• i [µ�Y�+kJ S.:r� s •a^'���.Sal�,a.., � t?..�•` '` / ra'� •.° � t� 1 �-F I rn r ,_ r{,'L ..� F - i �^'�•�s S"� :: �. a.r.+.hT1f� :i:�r +, F .' { ..ems+ . ' �f rxv�riF z y, L e t ``+ it - , �T'r'°�`„� i rrr '_" „•i_ ;F ��Sr`-iln'lr '�i, �, . L ' •+} �+ 1 t ';, r Gi+ - {s�if!' , _'T•iJ"' , +i r.•;S . a} 7AL T �i ���'•h r I+.s s��'1� � � ., fi+ r'' -: a r�+:-' �f' 'f... s^t�� }_¢�• sR*Y 'i ' ��• >f >[� q�` k;'�±„{, 1 .a z _ �[,."•>r 1 y+y. , S Yes ,�•' rl °ir...y r 1 ,aq'YFc+� °- X y'„��ra 4 3•. ` +.�"` `• t ' _ ""• -i 7�' "'- �1 •s :r�., ;r r t t�,' a��,,���yjj �, y tC�1.,isN `:`�Y'i 1_a+ •La�+i� e'v �: ��' •� rr �. rl"JTFa i" +�L �� � y� ;'.��'- , �': � �i. +a 1 �+' + h 1 s .IC" t�} t� ' � + :�,u� � opts h 1 r � -# j+r, f it%Y•g, a � i' • .r+ ti,.'.F(;. r ,i +,SS•, +? i. '61it �.+ rVLfw�, .',� L L''T $,n s��. \ tM1;' ;�� r 6,-r •1',�`,�y. ' yr} r S Si .e f r alk• 4^ :r. � 5 ' 6 v 3' hx y, :ar ?r r �F,' 4 k+• 4'+ Y ^ t 1,3 CY 'k! nw , q'�;., �.;^t' t �,.t. i, .f'i�a •r\.. J•`w� 4 �fL `°? ^r i a ;� 'G' r. ` i, !• _ ��'�•1�[ f,��'}i!,�fi�r►�}- at ��� r � i i�� -''�pr �„ .•al'1 � {• �h� , �. fie' ,���_ „'' ,; i • S'{•M r 'ra b 3 ,�' P' ai'1 J :S �: , - ` - y p 7' t J j f Y:' J� 4 •� ij� rid; . i�r4t •'i •tr.�'J,,'ri T�'y'r' ��y7 {y�'�.sT f^'-i ` } •-e=WR _ .i ll�.� Sf� t /-, \ :I r !�'�C.aC '�'�S '!. '{ � J +• �3'- � !' -9 r:,� ��aa +t:. �� r- r+.? ��� �. r +I i is ��r, �`jF..•L ri?.""r�+ i K 7 °' .{ t' '4�tr'+s r .' ti - yc,a .�`• L t S_5'r�j�E � r�� ;.y° �. �`�t r� • r } ��SI ,1 1 f'4`� � a ! -'"' i '' IA i%r / �Y{ S �+ j• i r �r'a F}�. + � r• ��l f ,r�,1t �4 � •. �, ++^.a' f'?•{�1 $t, "fi`r ;'i` t .t r y r {.¢I 4 � .�L Syr a �Vr. '3i ��r�Y �Y tit�1• ''r f .� � jk �`-i•.t .�i'. �.�rlar�7r� �.. `�'s ,�,,•hi�' G ��"r'4��rr ,t-!5°�J1 �+ yy l_.::;� y >rf7i' �js1�' Y a} 5' Gb'; .'� +?�rf�_. SR�.fi.Yri..i ;'y��` 1T��. ji •r.. Z:r �� ~S 1 r ' •�• _ b ; 'r is t � i'�, .,Lr ..� { - { 11 - - � 9'ICd. . Y -• ; `; ti'7L+ �, i . r �i�- ;{1 ;rjr ,,. � � .''_ .Y; Y+..?,r'r 117 a - l_•{":.nl . � s+r .,ti 1 • ,T�;L��Y2} h fr tt.t r�':.. r � .�k. (Whiple ivorksheas may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) -r 1 �3 `'t Field number (identification) I (VO Fis, t d) 2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes 4_ # Interior lanes ^� # Exterior lanes 9(00 feet) Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes -7'dO [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes 9VQ[feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 3 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet 0 e- k As � ,� ; � j-�n � z 7 I ' 5. Spacing L U Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout --V,. Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or x Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0. `I 15 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table t L 7d Column o 5, 35 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) ;Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width 27 I [feet]] / 43,560 0, y (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EC- 10 Column & 6 0 4 80 Total acres for travel lane length (Lx) (Sum: a + b + c) -- Z Travel lane length (L_) X interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) _ 0 L -2115 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E �- D Column 4. 953 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) JPull length? if [feet} X Wetted width Z1 1 [feet]] / 43,560 0,31 JE (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E V10 Column F 50 9 9 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) -3 Travel lane length (L-) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column 13 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length `15i� [feet] X Wetted width Z`i 1 [feet]] / 43,560 0, 9 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 6 l D Column 6 9 l Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 8 (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X 1 # Lanes = 6'. &'g Acres 5. 5 (b) Acres per travel lane length (U) X 1 # Lanes = 5 - Acres Z - `1 9 (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X _ I # Lanes = 2 , 9 R Acres 1 6�1 & 6 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sure.: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: �2 , 4?el-,— Signature of technical specialist r1SJ Date: 6 -22rOb (Mriliiple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) -T' � 33 G1 Field number (identification) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATIOiU SYSTEM (vA FIA) 2. Irrigation system designation _____ Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system l 3. Number of travel lanes ) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 300 ` feet] Length of pull(LI) ( i/z V u A [) # Interior lanes 1 # Exterior lanes SZr, [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 335- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet (y� �� �„a.�ln 7- z-1 1 5. Spacing V O Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout - Multiple hydrants _____ Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants 7. head the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Z _ Travel lane length (L� K Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) _ ha� Al O S ZS (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E 1-7o Column . g (b) Acres muddle portion of pull (L1) {Pull length3QQ[#eet] X Wetted width Z -7 1 [feet]) / 43,560 031 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table ES O Column iA l cull t?.JA =3,0c-cr 1-5 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) f kA 4 M 2-2_ Travel lane length (L-) _ Interior or '�( Exterior (lane/hydrant) ftg� (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E � ? d7 d Column $_ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull length W [feet] X Wetted width s [feet]} / 4 3,5 60 0- 4 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table F'6-7 O- Column E 5 7 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum.- a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) Interior or _Lxterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) 143,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. l S (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X l # Lanes = 11.{ Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Lfo S7 Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 6 4 O I Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Cam' t�� Date: 6-2'Z-06 Signature of technical specialist (MIiltiple ivoiksbeets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 1 3 L-I Z Field number (identification) (V (A 2. Irrigation system designation be Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes �_ # Exterior lanes !22 feet] Length of pull(L1) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 33s [feet] from Field Data Worksheet a,e-1Av.d W4 +�' - 'Z`j 11 5. Spacing Z:-. Q Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants r?- Single hydrant — Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 61 _ Travel lane length (L, _____ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0.1 Z (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column B (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) {Pull length700 [feet] X Wetted widthZ1 l [feet]] / 43,560 d� y 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 6 9 O � Column _6 -t5$ Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or ____Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column — Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) tPull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. S� S (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X # Lanes = _ S� Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres S -$ Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: �r�-�"� Date: �'' Z�'° 6 Signature of technical specialist (AdIdtiple worksheets 777a), be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) 13 9 Z Field number (identification) V !~ 18 2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _New expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes _ # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes feet] Length of pull(Ll) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) 4 Interior lanes # Exterior lanes _ [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 3 5 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet we14+e d = 21 i ' 5. Spacing /7" 01 Hydrant spacing [feet] {as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout —Multiple hydrants X Single hydrant —Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) ej 0- 12 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E 0 " Column 2. y.3 `_ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width2--7 1 [feet]) J 43,560 • `i i (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table q D column 3. Total acres for travel lane length (Li) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or Exterior (lanelhydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]; 143,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull fiom Table Column (la) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) 143,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lame length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3.6 G {a) Acres per travel lane length (Li) X # Lanes = I te �, Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # lanes = Aczes (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X _ # Lanes = Acres 3, C4 ( Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: _62 �L`�"r _ Date: Signature of technical specialist 15J (Mrrltipfe ivorksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELLR IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET (' I. Farm number (identification) 7- 13 c[ Z Field number (identification) 1 V fl F 2, Irrigation system designation A— Existing irrigation system Newlexpanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes + # Exterior lanes 5ycfeet] Length of pull(L1) # interior lanes I # Exterior lanes SSO� [feet] Length of pull(LZ) # interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 3J [feet] from Field Data Worksheet W e+� e r) `r� -i,� = 2--7 I 5. Spacing `i d Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant _A- Excessively spaced hydrants 7. head the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. -- I Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or x Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0, `)15 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table jE 6 7 Column 32 `1 Z (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) (Pull length ss0 [feet] X Wetted width 2, I [feet]) / 43,560 �LI I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 66- 70 Column 6 y .7 $ Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c) �Z Travel lane length (L-) Interior or k Exterior (lane/hydrant) q ► 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table CC- 70 Column B `I 'Z (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull lengthSSo [feet] X Wetted width Z-'1 I [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table C-e '7 4 Column 4�' 4. ­75" Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum-. a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 9 - (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X [ # Lanes = y ; 7 S Acres 6-1 75 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X I # Lanes = 4.7 5 Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 1 . 5 0 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Warksheet Completed by: 1-1 Date: GLz-a6 Signature of technical specialist fir' h6,,Aes oW F1d'7 fM 00ple wo+kslieets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 1 3 y Field number (identification) J Nn r-��� 2. Irrigation system designation �( Existing irrigation system Newlexpanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes n L�lfeet] Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3.35 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet d w 4 8A4 t = 2--7 1 5. Spacing Z y 0 Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants X Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 5-1 Travel lane length (L, _____ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) i� GZ (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E 1 Q * Column `1 . 2�3 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) [Pull length(o�rQ [feet} X Wetted width 2l I [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E I D - Column E -50 9 & Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Colurnn (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1,2) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, interior or _Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lame length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 5. ` 1( (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X # Lanes = 5(0 Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres S- 4 b Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 6�a��1 Date: �?Z'016 Signature of technical specialist �l (Multiple worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE- TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 134 '2- Field number (identification) 4 V4 F,'c)A/ 2. Irrigation system designation _____ Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes_ # Exterior lanes 3 l 5 feet] Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes x # Exterior lanes L125 [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 33s [feet] from Field Data Worksheet WT-AvwA- %— 1'tt�\ = 2'7 l " 5. Spacing 2HD Hydrant spacing [feet] '7 d [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout 7C Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. head the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. H --1 Travel lame length (L, - Interior or x Exterior (lanethydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FF7o Column /3 9 b (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) [Pull length3i 5 [feet] X Wetted width271 [feet]i / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from fable FF 7� Column r- 3 "q Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Z Travel lane length (L, Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) d• `i1 T - (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FF7'? Column 2 6 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull lengtht25 [feet] X Wetted width 2l [feet]) / 43,560 H ( (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table hF7 d Column F 5` � 7 Total acre'§ for travel lame lengtlx (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (1._) Interior or _Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3.29 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X 1 # Lanes = 3- � Acres 3,17 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X r # Lanes = 117 Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 7 76 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Signature of technical specialist �.J Date: (Multiple miksheets nury tae i7eeded) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET _ 4L 1. Farm number (identification) % 33Field number (identification) c� 2. Irrigation system designation x Existing irrigation system —New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes G ' feet] Length of pull(L7) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 00' [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes i # Exterior lanes 2 q 0� [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet W e 4+e A µ,,`LAA, .- 2-71 ' 5. Spacing Z Li n Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter) 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants Single hydrant � _ Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 3- 1 TraveI lame length (L, _ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) C, 9 1 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 70 Column 0, `7 S (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) {Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width`? f [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table - C 7 c Column C Z W 8 Total acres for travel lane length (1,1) (Sum: a + b + c) Z Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or __X_Exterior (cane/hydrant) 0, 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EE � o Column 13 2- , ut (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull length 11LO [feet] X Wetted width Z71 [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 6E7D Column 45 3; V 1 Total acres for travel lane length (1,2) (Sum: a + b + c) 3 -_ j Travel lane length (L-) � Interior or x Exterior (lane/hydrant) q p C , 8 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column J ! (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length7.q 0 ]feet] X Wetted width Z� [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 6 10-+ Column E 3. b 3 Total acres for travel lame length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 2 D$ (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X # Lanes = Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (1,2) X 1 # Lanes = f Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X 1 # Lanes = 3, 03 Acres 0 , I z Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum. 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 6/ cr/t-- Date: 6- Z2'o 6 Signature of technical specialist (Multiple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD NOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) . T 13 L- I Field number (identification) I ( U n F, �) 2. Irrigation system designation _ Existing irrigation system _New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes ` # Exterior lanes '95 feet] Length of pull(L1) i # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes ';Ms [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) l 112 I 4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet 5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout —Multiple hydrants —Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. -1 Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or / Exterior (lane/hydrant) C, 5 75 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 'y�� 0 Column 13 5, 5" 1 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) {Pull length"�� [feet] X Wetted width 7-? l [feet] 143,560 02 Z-7 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N e L 0 Column E to 3 & Total acres for 'travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) -•2, Travel lane length (L, _3�_ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0.535" (a) Acres start end of pull from Table NX to b Column 5. EL (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pulllength?'Cf5 [feet] X Wetted width2-71 [feet] /43,560 ,' q 2 3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N 1 & D Column V s DTotal acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, A Interior or Exterior (lane hydrant) 11 0.555 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table N 1. G 0 Column .Q (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet3 X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560 0 Z3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N! tc D Column 3. y + Total acres for travellane length (L3 (Sum,: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X 1 # Lanes = 6'-3J� Acres & - 2 `d (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X i #Lanes = &- 7- F Acres 3. 1 Lj__ (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X ti # Lanes = 3 1 1 `4 Acres 5,11 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: di Date: Signature of technical specialist (A9711tiple worksheets HW)' be 17CM d) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOST= TRAVELER IRRIGATIOIU SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) T 13 5. Field number (identification) 10 ((NC rlrA1 2. Irrigation system designation —Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes ? # Exterior lanes .10 feet] Length of pull(Ll) Y2 H-kro �. # Interior lanes # Facterim lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 335- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet u-e4-44 ., 44y % = 2-71, 5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout — Multiple hydrants Y Single hydrant � Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L_) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0-1 0.12 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F9D Column 3 ! 2, n (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Li) Kalb (Pull length32J [feet] X Wetted width "I [feet]) / 43,560 T� ' �"' 4• �1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column F P1 = 1.2-3 H.114' : 1.62 [ �2 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum,: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or _Exterior (iane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. [ b (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X 1 # Lanes = 1, Z Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 62 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Suns: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: �Date: �' Z Z-D 6 Signature of techrvca3 specialist �J (h4uMple lmksheds inny be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) T 1 3S Field number (identification) 11 ( 0r- S0 1c 2. Irrigation system designation 'x Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # interior lanes { # Exterior lanes P40 feet] Length of pull(LI) 1 # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes ► [feet] Length of pull(LZ) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 33 S [feet] from Field Data Worksheet -;A 0, 1 1-1/ 5. Spacing 219 0 Hydrant spacing [feet] G D [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants — Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and colu= based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L-) X Interior or _ Exterior (lane/hydrant) 11 { 0• 7 L (a) Acres start end of pull from Table tr- Y 60 Column i3 H ui f D• 6 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) {Pull length 110 [feet] X Wetted width `l� 1 [feet]) / 43,560 tr• 23 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table C-T 6 0 Column F F,11 = 1, to 3 H. tr n P. r 1 04 2 Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L,) Interior or Y Exterior (lane/hydrant) Q• 6 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F E 6 O Column [ 1 0• 10 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) Fowl [Pull lengthl110 [feet] X Wetted width. "I [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table [F 60 Column 2 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L) Interior or TExterior Qane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. D, 11 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X I # Lanes = 0..4 2 Acres 2._1 L (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X 1 # Lanes = 2 f Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes = Acres 12 Z Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + Be) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 91�p `_ _ _ Date: 2 2- D 6 Signature of technical specialist (Multiple worksheas may be needed) 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. 7. HARD HOSE TRAVf;LER IRRIGATION SYSTLIvI Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET Farm number (identification) T 13 S3 Field number (identification) 12 ( Nt Fv- tl Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _New/expanded irrigation system Number of travel lanes #lnterior lanes k #Exterior lanes 5 `i4 feet] Length of pull(LI.) Y �o it # Interior lanes V 4 Exterior lanes O [feet] Length of pul](L2),(u11 ckcIe # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(1,3) Wetted diameter 33 S [feet] from Field Data Worksbeet Ve-44 -4 = " Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or __y,__ Exterior (lane/hydrant) Q 12 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table JF90+ Column 13 36 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) 14if T%V1 w [Pull length S40 [feet] X Wetted width'421 [feet]) 143,560 N! (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column N. 541 Wolf = -1. 3 J 1.10 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L-) _ Interior or XExterior (lane/hydrant) 1 1 - 1 R (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column i 1 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) C��cMC' ;Pull length 0 [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column ci Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, Interior or _Exterior {lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,S60 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 2- 30 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X I # Lanes = 3 Acres °I `I (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 1"•-11 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by Signature of technical specialist Date: fi`27-04 Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures for Wastewater Application Equipment Table EE70. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Exterior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 70 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) B) (C) (D) M (F) (G) 150 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.13 0.15 160 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.09 0,15 0.17 170 0.24 0,00 0.05 0.11 0.17 0,19 180 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.22 190 0.29 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.21 0.24 200 0.33 0.00 0.07 0.15 0.24 0.27 210 0,36 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.25 0.29 220 0.40 0.00 0.08 0.18 0.29 ❑.32` 230 0,43 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.31 0.35 240 0.47 D.00 0.10 0.21 0.34 0.38 250 0.51 0.00 0.11 0.23 0.37 0.42 260 0.55 0.00 0.12 0.25 0.40 0.45 270 0.60 0.00 0.12 0.27 0.43 0.49 280 0.64 0.00 0.13 0.29 0.46 0.52 290 0.69 0.00 0.14 0.31 0.50 0.56 300 0,74 0.00 0.15 0.33 0.53 0,60 310 0.78 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.57 0.64 320 0.84 0.00 0.18 0.37 0,61 0.68 335 330 <340 0.89 0.00 0.19 0.40� 0141 M4 0.73 0.94 0.00 0.20 0.42_ 0,68 0,77 350 _ _ 1.00 _ 0.00 0.21 0.45 0.72 0.82 360 1.06 0.00 0.22 0.47 0.77 0,86 370 1.12 0.00 0.23 0.50 0.81 0.91 360 1.18 0.00 0.25 0.53 0.85 0,96 390 1.24 0.00 0.26 0.56 0.90 1.01 400 1.31 _ 0.00 0.27 0.59 0.95 1,07 410 1.37 0.00 0.29 0.62 0,99 1.12 420 1.44 0.00 0.30 0.65 1.04 1,18 430 1.51 0.00 0.32 0.68 1.09 1.23 440 1,58 0.00 0.33 0.71 . 14 _.-1.29.,,,,_ 450 1.65 0,00 0,35 0.74 1.20 - �- 1.35 - 460 1.73 0.00 0.36 0.77 1.25 1.41 470 1..80 0.00 0.38 0.91 1.31 1,47 480 1.88 0,00 0,39 0.84 1.36 1,54 490 1.96 0.0D 0.41 0.88 1.42 1,60 500 2.04 0.00 0.43 0.91 1.48 1.67 HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Table E170. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Interior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 70 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (Feet) (acres) 180 degrees ZZ5 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees -- (A) - (B) - (C) (D) (E) (1) -_ (G) 1S0 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.06 0,11 0.13 160 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.15 170 0.21 0.00 OA3 0.08 0.15 0.17 180 0.24 0.00 0,04 0.09 0.16 0.19 190 0.26 0.00 0.04 OJO 0.18 0.21 200 0.29 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.20 O.Z3 210 0.32 0.00 0,05 0.12 0.22 O.Z6 220 0.35 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.25 0.28 230 - 0.39 0.00 0.06 0.15 0.27 0.31 240 0,42 0.00 0,07 0.16 0.29 0.34 250 0.46 0.00 0.07 0.18 0,32 0.36 260 0.49 0,00 0,08 0.19 0.34 0.39 270 0.53 0,00 0.08 0.20 0.37 0.42 280 0.57 0.00 0.09 0.22 0.40 0.46 290 0.62 0.00 0,10 0.24 0.43 0.49 300 0.66 _ 0.00 0.10 0.25 _ 0.46 0.52 310 0.70 0.00 0.11 0.27 0.49 0.56 320 0.75 0,00 0.12 0.29 0.52 0.60 �S �330 340 0.80 \ � 47 0.85 l 0.00 0.00 0.13 0,13 0.31 � 0,32 / l � 0.55 0.59 0,63 0,67 350 0.90 0.00 0,14 0,34 0,62 0.71 360 0.95 0.00 0.15 0,36 0.66 0.75 370 1.00 0.00 0,16 0.38 0.69 0.80 380 1.06 0,00 0,17 0.41 0.73 0.84 390 1.11 0.00 0,18 0.43 0.77 0.88 400 1.17 0.00 0.19 OAS 0.81 0.93 410 1,23 0,00 0.20 0.47 0.85 0.98 420 1.29 0.00 0.21 0,50 0.89 1.03 430 1.35 0.00 0.22 0.52 0.94 1.0B 440 1.42 0.00 0.23 0.54 0,9B 1,13 450 1.48 0.00 0.24 0,57 1.03 1.18 460 1.55 0,00 0.25 0.59 1.07 1.23 470 1.62 0.00 0.26 0.62 1,12 1.28 480 1,69 0,00 0,27 0.65 1.17 1.34 490 1.76 0.DO 0.28 0.68 1.22 1,40 500 1,83 0.00 0.29 0.70 1.27 1.45 Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures for Wastewater Application Equipment Table E90+. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Fields with single pull or multiple pulls and Hydrant spacing greater than 90 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area A,; ; arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) �180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) B) C) (D) `E (F) (G) 150 0.16 0.00 OM 0.08 0.12 0.14 160 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.16 170 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.16 0.18 180 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.20 190 0.26 0.00 0A7 0.13 0.20 0.22 200 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.15 0.22 0.24 210 0.32 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.27 220 0.35 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.29 230 0.39 0.00 0.10 0,19 0.29 0.32 240 0.42 0.00 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.35 250 0.46 0.00 0.11 0,23 0.34 0.38 260 0.49 0.00 0.12 0.25 0.37 0.41 270 0.53 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.40 0.44 280 0.57 0.00 0,14 0.29 0.43 0.48 290 0.61 0.00 0.15 0.31 0.46 0.51 300 0.66 0.00 0.16 0.33 0.49 0.55 310 0.70 0.00 0.18 0,35 0.53 0.58 320 0.75 0.00 0.19 0.37 0.56 0.62 330 33s 0.80 %°.gz 0.00 0.20 0.40 o�ti� 0.60 0.66 340 0.84 0.00 0.21 0.42 0.63 0.70 350 _ 0.89 0.00 0.22 0.45 0,67 0,75 360 0.95 0.00 024 0.47 0.71 0.79 370 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 0.83 380 1.05 0.00 0,26 0.53 0.79 0.88 390 1.11 0.00 0.28 0.56 0.83 0.93 400 1.17 0.00 0.29 0.59 0.88 0.97 410 1.23 0.00 0.31 0.61 0.92 1.02 420 1.29 0.00 0.32 0.64 0.97 1.07 430 1.35 0.00 0.34 0.68 1.01 1.13 440 1.41 0.00 0,35 0.71 1.06 1.18 450 1.48 0.00 0.37 0.74 1.11 1.23 460 1,55 0.00 0.39 0.77 1.16 1.29 470. 1.61 0.00 0.40 0.81 1.21 1.34 480 1.68 0.00 0.42 0.84 1.26 1.40 490 1,75 0.00 0.44 0.89 1.32 1.46 500 1.83 0.00 0.46 0.91 1,37 1.52 30) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Table N160. Area Allowances for New or Expanded Hard Hose Traveler Systems Interior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 60 percent of wetted diameter (Acreage is outside-starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) 150 0,11 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.08 0.09 160 0.12 0,00 0.02 0.05 0.09 0,10 170 0,14 0.00 0.02 0,06 0.10 0.11 180 0.15 OA0 0.03 0.07 0.11 0,13 190 _ 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.14 200 0,19 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.14 0.15 210 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.17 220 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.10 0.17 0.19 230 0.25 0.00 OAS 0.11 0.18 0,20 240 0.28 MO 0.05 OAZ 0.20 0.22 250 0.30 0,00 0.05 0.13 0.21 0.24 260 0.32 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.23 0.26 270 0.35 0.00 0.06 0.15 0.25 0.28 280 0.37 0.00 0.07 0.16 0,27 0,30 290 0.40 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.29. 0.33 300 0.43 0.00 0.08 0.18 _ _ 0.31 0.35 310 0.46 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.33 0.37 3ZO 0.49 0.00 0.09 0.21 0.35 0AO /330 335- 0.52\ ,535 0.00 0,49 0.22\ p, L 3 0.37 0,42 \ 340 0.55 / 0,_00 0,10 0.24 / 0.39 OAS 350 0.59 _ 0.00 0.10 0.25 _ 0.42 0.47 360 0.62 0.00 0.11 0.26 0.44 0.50 370 0.65 0.00 0.12 0.28 0.47 0.53 380 0.69 0.00 0.12 0.29 0.49 0,56 390 0.73 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.52_ 0,59 400 0.76 0.00 0.14 _ 0.33 0,55 0.62 410 0.80 0.00 0.14 0.34 0.57 0,65 420 0.84 0.04 OAS 0.36 AV. 6C 0.68 430 0.88 0.00 0.16 0.38 0.63 0.71 440 0.93 0.00 0.17 0.39 0.75 ' 450 0.97 0,00 0.17 0.41 0.69 0.78 460 1.01 0.00 0.18 0.43 0.72 0.82 470 1.06 0.00 0,19 0.45 0.75 0.85 480 1.10 0.00 0.20 0.47 0,79 0.89 490 1.15 0.00 0.21 0.49 0.82 0.93 500 1.20 0,00 0,21 0.51 0.85 0.97 HARD DOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Table NE60. Area Allowances for New or Expanded Hard Hose Traveler Systems Exterior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 60 percent of wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle art angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees Z25 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees ISO 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.09 160 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.11 170 0.15 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.11 0.12 180 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.12 0.14 190 0.19 0.00 0,09 0.14 0.15 200 0.21 _ 0.00 _0004 0.04 0,10 0.15 0.17 210 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.19 220 0.25 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.18 0.20 230 0.27 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.22 240 0.30 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.24 250 0.32 0.00 0.07 0.15 0.24 _ Y�0.26 260 0.35 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.25 0.29 270 0.37 0.00 0.08 0.17 0.27 0.31 280 0.40 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.29 0.33 290 0.43 0.00 0.09 0.20 0.32 0.35 300 0.46 0.00 0.10 0.22 0.34 0.38 310 0.49 0.00 0.11 0.23 0.36 0.41 320 0.53 0100 0.11 0.24 0.39 0.43 330 3'35 0.56 , i.S 0.00 0.12 0.26 d .2- -1 0.41 0.46 340 0.59 0.00 0.13 0.28 0.43 0.49 350 0.63' 0100 0.14 0.29 0.46 0.52 360 0.67 0.00 0.14 0.31 0.49 0.55 370 0.70 0.00 0.15 0.33 0.51 0.58 380 0.74 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.54 0.61 390 0.78 0.00 017 0.36 0.57 0.64 400 0.82 0.00 0.18 0.38 0.60 0.68 410 0.96 0.00 0.19 0.40 0.63 0,71 420 0.91 0.00 0.20 0.42 0.66 0.74 430 0.95 0.00 0.21 0.44 0.70 0,78 440 0.99 0.00 0.22 0.46 0.73 0.82 450 1.04 0,00 0.23 0.48 0.76 US 460 1.09 0.00 0.24 O.S1 0:80 0.89 470 1.13 0.00 0.25 0.53 0.83 0.93 480 1.18 0.00 0.26 0.55 0.87 0.97 490 1.23 0.00 0.27 0.57 0.90 1.01 S00 1.28 0.00 0.28 0.60 0.94 1.05 37) Arthur Holt King -- Wettable Acres Summary VA Fields - These fields will not be included if the farm is sold. Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1339 1-1 6.68 1-2 5.99 1-3 2.99 15.66 1339 2-1 1.50 2-2 4.57 6.07 1342 3-1 2.08 3-2 3.81 3-3 3.03 8.92 1342 4-139- 3. q 4-2fi-3- 3 • a 1 1342 5-1 5.46 5.46 1342 6-1 4.75 6-2 4.75 9.50 1342 8-1 3.66 3.66 1342 9-1 5.58 5.58 L' CIZx,1,- , n°� Arthur Holt King -- Wettable Acres Summary (pg2) These fields will be included if the farm is sold. "New VA Field Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1341 1-1 6.36 1-2 6.28 1-3 3,14 15.78 NC Fields Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1353 10-1 -1-4- 1 (r Z 47- 1,62 1353 11-1 - - Q 8 �- 1 1353 12-1 -'1 5� 3. �`� Y �'-T Total Wetted Acres available if farm is sold �A NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary October 7, 2009 Arthur H. King Arthur H. King Farm 977 Paschall Rd Warrenton, NC 227589 Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates Certificate of Coverage No. AWS930014 Arthur H. King Farm Animal Waste Management System Warren County Dear Arthur H. King: The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on September 4, 2009. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for the lagoon at the Arthur H. King Farm facility. Due to the amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2013. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (919) 715-6937. Sincerely, Miressa D. Garoma Animal Feeding Operations Unit cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section Central Files 1Aq VA 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One Phone: 919-607-63001 FAX: 919-807-64921 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 North Cal olina lntemet: www.ncwaterqualiry.org a �}�`x����/�``Il,� , An Equal Opparlunily 1 Affirmative Action Fm layer J �J Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization This plan has been prepared for: King Farm Arthur Holt King 977 Paschall Station Rd Warrenton, NC 2758.9 252-456-4377 06-27-2006 This plan has been developed by: Larry West Warren SWCD 820 US Hwy 1.58 Bus, W Suite 102 Warrenton, NC 27589 (252) 257-3836 Developer Si Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning anima] waste management`that are included with this plan. iEl el— Signature(owner) Date jC-' C"J �! Q0 i Signature (manager or pro ucer) Date r w This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture;- Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water—=-_'-�- Conservation Commission. Plan Approved By: Technical Specialist i ture Date ........... ... ........-------- --- ........ ......... --- .... ............ ------..---------------------.... 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 R(j �YMMNR I D1iVQ AQUjFFR'PP0TFr,,T10! SFCT10N MAR 18 2c09 Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following source(s): Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan. S11 Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 1,930,500 gals/year by a 500 animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 2979 Incorporated 5116 Injected 5634 Irrigated 3238 Max. Avail. PAN (lbs) * Actual PAN Applied (Ibs) PAN Surplus/ Deficit (lbs) Actual Volume Applied (Gallons) Volume Surplus/ Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 3,238 20284 -17,046 12,093,203 -10,162,703 Year 2 3,238 20113 -16,875 11,991,206 -10,060,706 Note: In source ID, S means standard source, t) means user defined source. * Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Source Page Page 1 of 1 Narrative There are four (4) tracts of land on this farm that are used for spray fields to accomendate the waste generated from the 500 sow farrow to feeder operation located on site. Three (3) of the tracts of land on this farm are located entirely in the state of Virginia but administrated through the Warren County, North Carolina Farm Service Agency (FSA). Landowner,/producer Arthur Holt King asked for our office to devlope a NMP to reflect all acres on all four of his tracts of land. In this NMP the Virginia tracts are identified the letters VA in front of the tract number, the North Carolina tract is identified solely numeric manner. The tract listed as VA1341 was enlarged by the owner in the Fall of 2005 that increased total wettable acres to 15.7 as documented by Division of Soil & Water Enviromental Engineer Carl Dunn from the Washington, NC office. All cropland on each tract have been evaluated and wettable acres have been determined. The individual fields listed in the NMP are now actual irrigation pulls, thus the field acreage listed for each sub -field is the wettable acreage for each pull. The plan is based on pulls instead of fields for more ease of record keeping. ------------------------------------------------------- ---- --------------------- ------------------------- - ------..--------- -- ...---.-- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Narrative Page Page I of I 7,e table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P2O5 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available. If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P2O5 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High. Planned Crops Summary P205 Total Useable Plat Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating Ll Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre) 1353 10-1 1.62 1.62 Low NIA Wedowee Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 46 NIA 1353 l 1-1 0.82 0,821 Low NIA Wedowee Fescue Hay 29 Tons 46 NIA 1353 11-2 2.1 2.10 Low 1.0 Wedowee Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 46 NIA 1353 12-1 3.29 3.29 Medium N/A Wedowee Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 39 bu. 31 NIA Com, Grain 108 bu. NIA NIA VA1339 1-1 6.68 6.68 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 NIA VA1339 1-2 5.99 5.99 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 NIA VA1339 1-3 2.99 2.99 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bennudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 68 NIA VA1339 2-1 1.5c 1.50 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA VA1339 2-2 4,57 4,57 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA VA1341 1-1 6.36 6.36 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons NIA NIA VA1341 1-2 6.28 6.28 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5A Tons NIA NIA VA1341 1-3 3.14 3.14 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5A Tons,NIA NIA VA1342 13-1 1,50 1.50 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 N/A VA1342 3-1 2.08 2.08 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 85 NIA VA1342 3-2 3.81 3.81 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA VA1342 3-3 3.03 3.03 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5A Tons 85 NIA VA1342 4-1 3,29 3.29 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5A Tons 66 NIA VA1342 4-2 1 3.97 3.97 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 5-1 5.46 5.46 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 6-1 4.75 4.75 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 6-2 4.75 4.75 Low NIA Appling Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 66 NIA VA1342 8-1 3.66 3.66 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.S Tons 86 NIA VA1342 9-1 5,58 5.58 Low NIA Appling Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 86 NIA PLAN TOTALS: 87.22 87.22 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 PCS Page Page 1 of 2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. LI Polenlial Leaching Technical Guidance c 2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None nutrient leaching below the root zone. >_ 2 & Moderate potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. <= ] 0 nutrient leaching below the root zone. High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils nutrient leaching below the root zone. available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples > 10 are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based potations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391). PLAT Index Rating P Managenent Recomniendation 0 - 25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application 25 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application 51 - 100 High Application limited to crop 1' removal > 100 Very High Starter P application only 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 PCS Page Page 2 of 2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. ' This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Waste Utilization Table Year I Tract Field Source I➢ Soil Scries Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applies Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbs/A) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res_ (IbslA) Applic. Method Manure PA NutricnLA pplied (lbs/A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) ILiquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1353 10-1 S11 Wedowee 1.62 1.62 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 811-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 o.00 124.59 0.00 1353 11-1 S11 Wedowee 0.82 0.82 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 63.06 0.00 1353 11-2 Sit Wedowee 2.10 2.10 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 brig. 129 76.91 0.00 161.51 0.00 1353 12-1 SI l Wedowee 3.29 3.29 Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 39 bu. 4/1-9/15 152 0 0 Irrig. 152 90.62 0.00 298.14 0.00 VA1339 1-1 SI1 Appling 6.68 6.68 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 brig. 244 145.47 0.00 971.73 0.00 VA1339 1-2 S11 Appling 5.99 5.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 871.35 0.00 VA1339 1-3 S11 Appling 2.99 2.99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 1 0 Irrig. 244 145,47 0.00 434.95 1 0.00 VA1339 2-1 S11 Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 2I8.20 0.00 VA1339 2-2 S11 Appling 4.57 4.57 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7131 244 0 0 brig. 244 145.47 0.00 664.79 0.00 VA1341 I-1 S11 Appling 6.36 6.36 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 910.01 - 0.00 VA1341 1-2 S1 I Appling 6.28 6.28 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 898.56 0.00 VA1341 1-3 S11 Appling 3.14 3.14 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 449.28 0.00 VA1342 13-1 SH Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 218.20 0.00 VA1342 3-1 Sl 1 Appling 2.08 2.08 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 297.61 0.00 VA1342 3-2 S11 Appling 3.81 3.81 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/3I 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 554.23 0.00 VA1342 3-3 Sil Appling 3.03 3.03 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Itrig. 240 143A8 0.00 433.54 0.00 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 1 of 4 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic, Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbs/A) Comm. Fert Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (lbs/A) Applic_ Method Manure PA NutnentA pplied (lbs/A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Stolid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gailA Tons 1000 gals ions VA1342 4-1 Sit Appling 3.29 3.29 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 470.74 0.00 VA1342 4-2 Sit Appling 3.97 3.97 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 311-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 568.04 0.00 VA1342 5-1 S11 Appling 5.46 5.46 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 781.24 0.()0 VA1342 6-1 S11 Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9130 240 0 0 1rrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 6-2 S11 Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5A Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679,65 0.00 VA1342 8-1 S11 Appling 3.66 3.66 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig, 244 145.47 0.00 532.41 0.00 VA1342 9-1 Sit Appling 1 5.58 5.58 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig_ 244 145.47 0.00 811.71 0.00 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 12.093.20- Total Produced, 1000 gallons Balance, 1000 gallons 10,162.70 Total Applied, tons#s fir..=,M6a 0.00 Total Produced, tons M 0.00 Balance, tons F. }ryx 0.00 Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise; owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 2 of 4 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbs/A) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (lbslA) Applic. Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbs/A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Wlid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 1353 10-1 S11 Wedowee 1.62 1.62 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 81I-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 124.59 0.00 1353 11-I S1 I Wedowee 0.82 0.82 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 63.06 0.00 1353 11-2 S11 Wedowee 2.10 2.10 Fescue Hay 2.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 129 0 0 Irrig. 129 76.91 0.00 161.5E 0.00 1353 12-I Sl I Wedowee 3.29 3.29 Corn, Grain 108 bu. 2/15-6/30 120 0 20 Irrig. [00 59.62 0.00 196.14 0.00 VA1339 1-1 S11 Appling 6.68 6.68 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 971.73 OM VA1339 1-2 S11 Appling 5.99 5.99 Hybrid Berrudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 871.35 0.00 VA1339 1-3 SI1 Appling 2.99 2,99 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.5 Tons 3/1-9/30 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145A7 0.00 434.95 0.00 VA1339 2-1 S1 I Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig, 244 145,47 0.00 218.20 0.00 VA1339 2-2 SI1 Appling 4.57 4.57 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 664.79 0.00 VA1341 1-1 S11 Appling 6.36 6.36 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig, 240 143.08 0.00 910.01 0.00 VA1341 1-2 S11 Appling 6.28 6.28 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143,081 0.00 898-56 0.00 VA1341 1-3 SI I Appling 3.14 3.14 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 811-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 449.28 0.00 VAI342 13-1 SI1 Appling 1.50 1.50 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 218.20 0.00 VA1342 3-1 S11 Appling 2.08 2.08 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 297.61 0.00 VA1342 3-2 SI1 Appling 3.81 3.81 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7/31 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145,471 0.00 554.23 0.00 VA1342 3-3 S11 Appling 3.03 303 Fescue Hay 5.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 OM 433.54 0.00 VA1342 4-1 S11 Appling 3.29 3.29 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 470.74 0.00 VA1342 4-2 S l l Appling 3.97 3.97 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 568.04 0.00 VA1342 5-1 S11 Appling 5.46 5.46 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 781.24 0.00 VA1347 6-1 S11 Appling 4.75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5.4 Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 6-2 SI1 Appling 4,75 4.75 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 5A Tons 3/1-9/30 240 0 0 Irrig. 240 143.08 0.00 679.65 0.00 VA1342 8-1 SI1 Appling 3.661 3.66 Fescue Hay 5.5 Tons 811-7131 244 0 0 Irrig. 244 145.47 0.00 532.41 0.00 720I29 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 3 of 4 Waste Utilization Table Year 2 Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid PA Fert. (lbsIA) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field) (1bs1A) (lbs1A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. 'Applic. APplic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons VA1342 9-1 S[1 Appling 5.58 5.58FescueHay 5.5Tons 811-7131 244 0 0 brig. 244 145.47 0.00 811.71 0.00 Total Applied, 1000 Gallons 11,991.21 z <- Total Produced, 1000 gallons 1,930.50. Balance, 1000 gallons 10.060.71 Total Applied, tons - i `` 0-00 T.r-.--: Total Produced, tons ;'; v �i 0.00 Balance, tons lrxs a ` :z Q_QQ Notes_ 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 WUT Page Page 4 of 4 The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application event. Irrigation Application Factors Tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (inches/hour) Application Amount (inches) 1353 10-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 11-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 11-2 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 1353 12-1 Wedowee 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 1-3 Appling 0,45 1.0 VA1339 2-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1339 2-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1341 1-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 13-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA1342 3-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 3-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 3-3 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 4-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 4-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 5-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 6-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 6-2 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 8-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 VA 1342 9-1 Appling 0.45 1.0 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/27/2006 IAF Page Page 1 of 1 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed ficids and crops for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified, The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field, In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen. Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR ] N (lbs/A) P2O5 (lbs/A) K2O (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 1353 10-1 Req'd Nutrients 129 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 1.62 8/] 7/31 Supplied By: Ltd 'b �ttnFnil- r ..,are"- h� S ! y°tF� ._t. � a «I, iT, y1r :fir 4 1.1 .I is -'. yYfi' 3,:f,P.. %. �•" y. 7� k , �, iY•14 ' �� ," ... • f k�'"?., " 1: ` - t'�:i W 1 *c ? ,+ CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Wedowee Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 2.9 Tons 04-16-06 Manure 129 69 176 16 1 3 1 0 P Removal Rating 46 lbslac. Low BALANCE 01 69 146116 1 3 1 0 Tract Field VA1342 4-1 Req'd Nutrients 240 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 3.29 3/1-9/30 Supplied By: 44 �KAcres lj. •A..' 1•,YZi y!_s;'Y 1. '.:sYl ,a .tPS-. ,. .J' CROP Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.4 Tons 1 04-16-06 Manure 240 128 328 29 1 5 1 0 P Removal Rating 66 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 128 278 29 1 5 1 0 Tract Field VA1342 6-2 Req'd Nutrients 240 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.75 3/1-9/30 Supplied By: CROp Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 5.4 Tons 1 04-16-06 Manure 240 128 328 29 1 5 1 0 PRemoval I Rating 66 lbs/a, low BALANCE 0 ]z8 318 29 l 1 5 1 0 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/27/2006 NMR Page Page 1 of l The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal. In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of time recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production . Rennirerl Snil Test Valves Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tonstacre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 1353 10-1 Fescue Hay 6.0 0.0 51 None 76 None VA1342 4-1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 6.4 0.0 80 None 248 None VA1342 6-2 1 Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay 1 6.6 0.0 76 None 278 None ------------------------------------------------------ --------- ..------------ 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 STY Page Page I of I The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column. Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied. Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern. Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table Crop Maximum PA-N Rate lb/ac Maximum Sludge Application Rate 1000 gal/ac Minimum Acres 5 Years Accumulation Minimum Acres 10 Years Accumulation Minimum Acres 15 Years Accumulation Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard Corn 120 bu 150 13.16 17.85 35.71 53.56 Hay 6 ton R.Y.E. 300 26.32 8.93 17.85 26.78 Soybean 40 bu 160 14.04 16.74 33.48 50.22 -------------------- ------------------ --------------- -.- -------- ................. -............................ -............-........-- .............................. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Sludge Page Page 1 of The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero. Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste Storage Capacity Source Name Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid 19/1 Design Storage Capacity (Days) Start Date 180 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity (Days) 1 1 149 1 2 180 1 3 180 1 4 180 1 5 180 I 6 180 1 7 180 1 8 180 1 9 180 1 10 180 1 11 180 1 12 149 2 1 118 2 2 180 2 3 180 2 4 180 2 5 180 2 6 180 2 7 180 2 8 180 2 9 180 2 10 180 2 11 180 2 12 149 * Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. ---------- ------------ ------------I------------ I ----------------- --- ----------------- I -------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1 Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. ......................................... ------ --- 720129 Database Version 3.1 ------------------------ ................... ------ ---- ................... Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Page 1 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.................... -.............. 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 6/27/2006 Specification Page 2 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. ....... ............................... 720129 Database Version 3.1 .... ................ .................................. --........... ....... .. Date Printed: 6/27/2006 Specification Pape 3 Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): 12-1 Corn Piedmont In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-1, 6-1, 6-2 Bermudagrass: Piedmont Adaptation. Moderate to Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3" deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Winter -kill is a frequent problem in the Upper Piedmont-, Coastal is not adapted there. Tifton 44 is the most cold -hardy cultivar. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. ----- -- --- ------ --- -------------- -------------- ------........... - - --- ...---------------- ------.----------- -- ----- - ...... 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2 The following crop note applies to fie]d(s): 10-1, 1-1, 11-1, 11-2, 1-2, 1-3, 13-1, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 8-1, 9-1 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast scedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 12-1 Soybeans -Full Season: Piedmont The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25-May 25. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production. ................. -----............................. ............................ ....... 720129 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-27-2006 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2 'dc.4,i.-• rh 3- ��yyyy.�+-c - -;+.. y�"� .��sL 4 ,+�. '�:�:.- 44�<.�S'=�se�., � �.r � �.r +,�.. ,•�E v ��., r i ]�,v��•-"''a� '�.N'tt. 'h'�bZ� rK : ,[•- - �'•rtrS '.-ti+., ] .-� -3. ,., a ``.. d i', r:t'.45i?, [fir w' ,.c $• .3.� •w � l � � y � a 'K- r "•�' '��� • r�,-s✓; •- in p��[F• �' 1, lei j 2n. -� a 4 '. Y.tiJ E *: a u a ►` r. r 't i?<,+. Y t=Y.ir�;{..�r. ,t�,.,tij .ii. :.f'.1. #"'k.r '.1�},'�e a ai'n4,�"r.J .J'i 'tea e R'��i-i''dCi �.� 4'.'s F„ "`•`�' b„ M .n r.'r- ytrYq,,+��{,d,.2 r`" d .��X,'„ i'1Y a,.i1,h 'N F. -'s; 4T•„ `51'�Ra'; vs1^` 4r-Si• �t 'r_ S t Y y 7�±y_ 32' -w �• Jr��,� h�+ �` ,;tiu�wJ- � a"�'_Al�+�it-�;�`,y�'�t�,ti .�!�; , ,,• •p t �� �f-...�=r yt . ��`'tk,'a-.'sip it-.�.1~p � '"s � 4:: t�K'E�. , �,zt � --�"� "{ � +.t�K'�r'L i � �4 .� yaY' , � y .� ' q p `�`.+ t "� bt � i:,y � �, •� • j`y" ,. rWT ��.e!Iy;,r r� � k. T r� � � r ` J -��i" w �' ,sfL' �'3r � ..;, � � y s?+v _ �!i r r �: `i •' `4-'' V \vr � .�� ♦i j �-s"'. r1 ."4�v- �4T`'�fY, 'f� �� y'•y V r ' �_ � Y � •' JY '�t�t_" s� � .^. � �'-a.. �� f.-� y_ � ' t z - '.�•`'� L ti •r�`-: � �� : �i 1r�t� ...e.':�, a _�.,�� r�'- :"t` Sw.-t `r , �' ' 1 • 'Y"Ct.` y � !t' f ]' . � , _ ,.y,; E �� t � �.�; rr y'l�- -� �.�� .� � '±, '"ti •J ,'i}}. F,;,- f a'r_ -�� .r;,� �-4 FZNk§.;.ic�...�1 a,r'� a.;'C-,{Y�( f♦ r. y �i"� r�(r��4`'"•7. 1•;5�,1•� �_ i W�.+ .r•.�. _k-+r- i'� L �S. ;;i -r�`T���i� -i;y�� w.t- .tE �,.. 7� '"f,:"" �!6,_ `i3`' gr :ir; �• + "." }- ^r_%ar.:s-'Yccft. __ 3 ~, '��y ."., �• ' c€tf �.lt.''` 9 t fit; r` r�' ��%.�.� f`�� 'r'i.o` —� �y ��" � r�_Y�- wtiA Y �1� � �� -I }�' :� � i'. - t _,y: yip• 7 f' �:�.� �Eel nP", '} /�y Ali _?"�i E, .. � {'�� •,' `JL�\ r - 'y � _. br j 1 s ,-7. �.��� �yr.�I y�q2 - ;� r •.qf; `" �: ra , £SI �� 1 t� „�, �t r � ,r titi i ,'-� Y C'G,�'t• � ;Yi �� ,�T,' ' 4f �i ' J � • ��yrCl � rj' � �4 .. ' ,!• , ,ir , . s ,� k �� "+'3 � p� � ,,3' �,',f�r���• i � `;a , r' , y�' r4 'f -� ��:ti�l r+ �.I r3. _,�_, •itS .-- _� 'y 't+� C",•�.�a,d �'.e;.•tSu;•'�'� pz �•$..'� .�.. �'.�• s,.t�3. t..�t,:+,.* ..fiJ ��'i' L•?'i4Y. -.,'. � t. � �-'��'-'.'.-�,i^. i> 71 �.,%� J� f � d,v� '•�`� ,r•' �irvti ,�,•�', e •�i•�lyF i. �",�i L� ''v� �%• I . 1:- J•3} �i eY� .r rr" y,�� v5 C\�� I".:1-7 -I` w'� F'-�fils-°�`..r -�± f • •`, ��. �''•[;" fit,' Y� aS if�(' •�.IK• C71`^i � .l . � > tom- r;n,� L , � I:. � - � •' / J ��� �����'�-,..'�3rr ' � r �'x�,.�'�� �- i'' J.. r k�'4� r �� -_!• � ,� f- W �'?rt� '�i ,I� i1.z''�r�,13 _ S� ±- i. 'fir��•�"'`fir�•� �r -';, �;. • jt ''-3'. i[tar;,''•.�:.F�,.S`"3AS� _f / . t. xX,_- p�,ri':�'Jtfl�k.i �.,i�rw,, - t. J, -J � ,� '� f '• r' i,i- � C •ij` M � +'�. �� i.`�'I `R 3: i '�p .F. _..,F �P"�• J - r' ,>' - t � . t i � k"- d, r Y,a '*. +�rJ�"/!i�y�' 1 r � c'-f ��_ � y:Cb�'•�—.«�'.-•h� J.�''-'"�s::' `'i r�� ti�+��r - .'.�,y Y ��s j � f �� , !! ' ��1:� yu9'3+1�•:F� �' � ,� ry f `'�t r•x=� �1��� �rc ��"'��J" �.'v�� 3ti r y � �,� i ;�� � i 'x4�.Fj, tiP �� ,r` M�ti�" T 7� ,t•.b, ,r•.•'•,t , ` 3 r .y?' ��e i�.'Y�, � `4y `� � � ,,��""' ,. it ♦., � `S. t t�' r"� � s�•�jep�'.�� . 4 � y .�..ic' + � i � � r �" - r fit. T r r.�-y 1 `Y,�R,% } �yi�zl'� ' r f y 1 1:. - ,K•f 'v� s ' P,�r � S� . ,�-4.;`:.r .r t' y�� k'f t � I ! ► {` r � JF Y `' "Y.�i 36 �,.{���'''TP4� i a�i yyr r � � y� �v� 1 t �,` �. - r .Fe�`6;. ;° 3C 4�� "' � ! ' 'ram' ' y7 �: ' ' � •„ �s t�n t 3'' '' r � ���•,. .{ f �ri 1 .xi' • 1 ;•.y'frd-'' +r ` J al'.. �ya• ' ., c :�F ��y a e� _ � �,�` ��-Ff�'���'�"� .� j:s- �2r _ ( _ t ,• i�Of'.Z +. r -G �14 .:.zr F:: Soil Legend for Arthur Holt King North Carolina mapped soils 71 B Wedowee 61 B Wake -Louisburg -Saw complex Virginia mapped soils AaB, ApC, ApB is mapped as Appling WdD, Wob is mapped as Wedowee Pe ;.r► �r r �sF at 1T r',-M •s 7t fc ' ram, . `- 4 r Y \ •1 + Y T. ! tom- �r T'y .. ; i " � h•�—__ . rli "�, • + r ;',c5d kr`,•�'m �.y'�- r - jt� d� lay, sd.•'�rAr s�.y j t� , r,.�"�r�`f•�'S � 7�- �;''�5- _ W r 5`.� ! -, r 1� 1, '�_ � '�e\.!� �'`{"� � ._"r,"�"t'' :'rr�b S r -r� _ w 2('' 1'=. '<sY: .. 'tea. f �S rat. 'i•'. t ) �� .. if '•J r. •ti �..,. r Y '� ' ri ;,-,s•m +'='�"t 'a; � -_ s,. 7 1 _ 3_ � �-.• �, y 'r. �F. A� r•,•' ��•^-r 'h. -y rr,. sw ,� `ir � ��,�,F.; �Y� tyye�ii5 �., � � ;7,� �f `�i !rf µr�r�:w,s^�''»��, �}�j�i�', ffi +.• 4 .,,��,�+'t f,�\- ',•1 •t l �'•`r!r '�, � "' � �.:. of y�+�• 1'� Y - .x �JJ r• P r+s is � ar s 1 M. %wrIl1�,,�3.ra � T;+r `.�rrpJt ' I f p. -..,r • .'Z'.Y_i�Xi�•- ' ice• i- F q�t i! "S". t'� T'rr- 7 A -A � `4 �Mt {M - 1�' y-, �`1 `'s M^ � _ #i' '(, l � �,�d��s'r _ r �,�fj � •.3 r� e t f!['`•W „ •�d 1�,.. �r 1 -a 1 Yam] _ r...�r:"t 4 r ,• rr r�F� �i'�' jr rir; . •ii ., r 'r dt .• �'' F " T ��a� 11 �• y iryryG, y� V �, y _• ' ' y Ar "" 1 r- k � 4 (• ` ''4 } Y ,r � 40 Ou-,y . Y MI, � " -,,P �, _ -. , 4 +*#„,�i•ar��. _ 'qi h Jl ? Rw9t �F�Apa j� i;ra •\,-1, fr r ' ? 3$ff = ' { ra r at 'rti+�! i V r r'+ i _ fir\ ° t r '- ✓`Li ;�:"` ^•f; C fr`i�' nP•,• err -{ 14} j4/Y;: r t fr, J6 1 � .•6Y. i-"y► 's: � 9ryy "r. .�.5• ti \ram ria•. r yi' TT'4�. is-}.F:• .,�/r/7//!lyy f (r,�a1.k.'ra y?._.a1':. ,%�.�, � T_' , �'--Sj• � i ,� •.: t4 ta� 1 'S % Y v ,j��1 4! •` , �' % fi..: � 1 � � �- C �y`, l:lt. Y. �• `�°', f - i'i'��y���,��..�,4. r+��';' Lkµ~:'r�j.r. r� '•� ,r.�iwj�.1-t�'ry�;i�� �l�'� � � �....�.,y>,'i. 1� `� - .:� :y�.a�'�. '•' 7R �Z]y'�::�rTsi q�':€A!'��:y.,^�'_�ti.�'} �pC [• l '$`.'f�5�• JL:�:� .:' .,itl�l�i�.+�:(, r i1,�_ t, �r 'yt Tw��'4S � ���fs�� rE 1' !,�� ��i a�n��y}aT, j� �L'►�,T{y P•„y� :.�I y u. �;l t'3Y r � }F 7r'1 . } e� 4�ti��`''T ,ri r t i � :�`'+�."�v�t '+�u� r'.� •y tn'_eA" .F i, �.•�"' �.. r �'S'^i+7� f(�,�q'r, n.. ,i�Q'� '�� F •�R ��si4srz' � � ,r �� , f.r" � � L � �"' r� . p � �Stiti4� k. � .� • y !' d�)Trtf'j 1 f�'� ,;Y�....�a�'�k�,r;, g+4 R ri.r �i,�c� a y�}�i.��,#r'r � `Y!-!� .�"� �� �. •��`` i ;1 Y "1 Z 1 .� s.Ji 1 ��f �F�/ i�� 4 [yi.5 � _ 2 .1' ♦ h.r� �' �'^• _J..:_� .� -., him i• _ vas s- '� � ..ra4 �� is `.' �+r --•, . [`V��t�,�i � 5 .�6„ .+sew: .•` s �,1 4 a � `.F rr� :6 s a�- 1 i �g L � �`� • 'e4$7i�s' � r� D+,�, 1 < - �+� r. i:i'•f�' G' r �#y f'Y ,• A�sti '+ 1� i 4 �_�L � rn". ,.^S: ,`�,...c�� ti.'as�• P _r�Ss ... R*;s .r-"Rtq i , �A'"`r4 }. �4't yar s �� -:�'": S Lr,.� {Tiyi;7r •/ ayr�•� f r � s, P � 1 � { J.1� ���i-•S�rnfdr• ��NF:s'�'.o±�"^} _ '' s � �tr �} s ��.,�irC.',�� � s •",ti �'�435�41 ter' y4 �.�fY ; �%r; "�1,���t� ��/ �9).,-,'!��� `r :•�f rAP�A �� � w ��' � _ • � ^frr.�• �.�Fhi � 1-ri r W :ti,• ._�i} rCy- i T -.w t.r /+'•1���r'iz^j`{N i'1'�''i th�.i ayg"\ ij . !"S/r T4� • (,�' ''_ 7r . r- �" ..,• .i ` '.� /yy .: •.� J ' ; :{iivi'ra� ' t3 lef 6�'t �i:E_� •"r4 tr w{ r_ r ILr'' ''�••�► •�e,,.e.,r � �-•!� y..�a.;'�!'�a,. •' '•' /� 1r`- `�+�'.' ,.`;%��,•=sty.-. �. '�a`.r�r•��►� \;r• �ro�,. t 1t I , r ,� .+ n �. »'•r�.,• J � r'�• 'r5 � i ��`N r < i .,r y y �, fy � [,,i- ,�»f }r� ` .,... �,7�„"' Y +i'y--ri•^` s—...� J"'ri�..-���r-qt�� rl ": y4i �. �c.) ,a. . �i�exa rs.F�r _ i.-r; �-•� _�' tv� Jam. � �.r'sT I + 1 '''�) , / _ i .1,, X 3, `! e}-�'1 r i.ti �"��,'� f�`` i-�f' ', '•• � .Y �,q Yy .9 '�• 'l1.'" ��" �yf, � S,j••.ir `l.r � .,y1•' .1 .;y �. i s :1.. r-r � � j � ,R r •AA ;�. .G �.rr r _1' • �'s � -r. � a ;'�-�"5�'' rY�y ,h� L 7 �r rr h ��fr!} � D'r 3 Y,`' J ,.•.y �+,i r•, r , . 'r ".7 4 ,; � e j'a'y X � if t � q� L;'^_, • it � h rr,' . � '2� `r, •,; q. �. �'�,r i ' �' y ' ,�s� � , r� � �4 r �,.r �•' �, ,� i+iD-, _">'it M. .r is ,y,,� � �'�'��'.�'`y�i e's.. } t. � y,.'~� ;([ - ru►�s y'2�ot' �� '�+�r- ,� : 'y , i _ ti�T;c4ti rf ~:� Sl � Jeri ��� d _� i- i 'J•�� w�nSrk_y.� a���I•i,. yJ'��a�.•yi`�,' �Y•� � S '� y ,i1'a.�-a s"yf 'jtir�„� ,.'4 � .'r�+,cs��� '�^'-`*�.r,: .� '...,-�t'•' r :x a`j,�::�� 1 ✓?.f�.,w�, f i(-�• ,�a'ClilV I w A 7i �'}�.. Ow �` F ,} � '.� 7 �.. •1. •� .. �5�. -�1 r - �„^..Y{i, h. `��' ! i C� r �'xi ^� � } � 'ice -7r i. r, g��' Y ?�i !S r �,» i,,�.- a ':7r'=r!,ti .' � ... ..� )�jl�•o- .,�;,:] �c , rr' � s .;�Fy!j�['' �4�...,!.3���T�' "��� a� )%Ir h� � e,,^re'y, -�' �V-•� 1 i:f^ �: �.'t+'' - �,•+�;n�j;��.i { ar - � �Y1,�.: .. .` '� , � -•Y ++�. , r �• {i� �' Y�wls'�i�}„��rri pa j4L-�i'••.'., '� ,;•• r:..:: .,y �.1,.': ,,i .rt�,.r,-, 1 s ,r'�: �_ -Y � `.: tx'�� �'rF, y�e \i'�+[iS,' t ro � , r �. �; ..,� y,_ + , �t �rYy�Jky.. .,`, �" t a•y�7 ;�� 1 .L.�_a�`�','„r.. r _,•�� .ash) �r y_� .y �'i � {.Nr' n�� . � r �� 'r '��+i r� �: y may✓ �ie - a y � - ,;�y:,1ti'1 ,St t ,f'•��'� �•� i �� i � (�h y� �• �ZY• ���1�r�Jtryjj."IiaV�"� `�"iR� � L`�+ti y•:r:; r� .ty aY, `•'y `�fF lj�,}.11�-ir}'+, s"' c i (M iltiple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM I. Farm number (identification) 11339 Field number (identification) I ` V n F 2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system—Newlexpanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes _ 4 # interior lanes �� # Exterior lanes �(- feet] Length of pull(Ll) 1 # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes -7 f tO [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes 4 �dO[feet) length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 [feet] from Field Data Wozksheet W e. VAs _l ,�; ,��� �1r, = Z 7 S. Spacing L U Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout b, Multiple hydrants — Single hydrant — Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L, Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0.9 16 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E6 �a Column j. 35 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) (Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width 21 1 [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EG 10 Column � Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c) �- Travel lane length (L_) ie Interior or Exterior gane/hydrant) _ 0. Sf Z5 (a) Acres start end of pull from 'fable � 1 � 0 Column 13 `f. g53 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull length-1 $0 [feet] X Wetted width 7-1 ) [feet]} / 43,560 � � 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 45 M-10 Column R ,5t 9 99 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) 1-3 Travel lane length (L-) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) O. #S (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 66 -10 Column 13 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) }Pull length 4 0 [feet] X Wetted width Z, I [feet]} / 43,560 �. 9 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table k 6 7 O Column E Z 9 1 Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum; a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. . S (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X b # Lanes = 6, & cZ Acres 5. 5 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X 1 ## Lanes = 5. `i 1 Acres z �1 (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X 1 _ # lanes = 2 . 91 Acres J . & (o Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Wozksheet Completed by: 452, Date: 6"22-'06 Signature of technical specialist (Multiple li,w*shrcts may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T f '-�3 cl Field number (identification) 2—(VA F [ A) 2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system ^Newlexpanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes ,SOD` feet] Length of puli(LI) # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes SZD [feet] Length of pull(L2) #i Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 335- [feet] from Field Data Woiksheet Wt_VA-e 8 L,,,� del- = Z1 1 ` 5. Spacing Zi-� a Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 2-1 Travel lane length (L, -9— Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) D. 8 7.5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E i7o Column . $ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) [Pull length,10D[feet] X Wetted width 7 1 [feetl) 1 43,560 O 315 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 613 O Column F 1 C+03 Fix [ 1 i� 3, 0 C�C' 1-5 Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c) C u. ! ! Travel lane length (L, —Interior or x Exterior (lanelhydrant) • 915 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Cc 7 Column 3, ,Z y (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull lengthSZO [feet] X Wetted width �'7 I [feet]} / 43,560 0. 4 1 OtjW (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table fE 7 O Column — 9.5 1 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) � Interior or _ Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] 1 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. S (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X 1 # Lanes = 115- Acres 4 ] (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X !} It Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X #! Lanes = Acres O 7 Total CA JMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: G � ��-�� Date: &-Z,Z--06 Signature of technical specialist 35; (MUIN131e worksheets ma)' be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSC TRAVELER IRRIGATIOI'� SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) T._13_L- Z Field number (identification) IX (V(� F l J� 2. Irrigation system designation V Existing irrigation system w New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 7�' feet] Length of pull(L1) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 335- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet w e 4A9 d l .,3t'A 1A, m Z,'1 j 5_ Spacing ZED Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants >(- Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) G .g Z (a) Acres start end of pull from Table D " Column g 5 (5) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) {Pull length700 [feet] X Wetted widthZ7 t [feet]l / 43,560 d� y (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 6 i Q * Column -A6�- - �� ✓`�$ Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table _ Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L,) _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. S�, 5 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = Acres (b) Acres per 'travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres S 5? Total CAM7 MP wettable acres for field (Scrum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 6'� Jam` Date: &'??-06 Signature of technical specialist :751 (Mzillipfe iwikslvets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE- TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) ,I / 3 _`1 .Z Field number (identification) r[A 2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes 4 # Exterior lanes 3X feet] Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 3 5 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet —ewe A A+' , = 2-7 I 5. Spacing LL•I L5 Hydrant spacing (feet] jas a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout _ Multiple hydrants X Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the 'irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 9-1 Travel lane length (Lj _Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) d . � 2 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E i �i " Column F) 2.93 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) [Pull length [feet] X Wetted widthZ-7 1 jfeet]) / 43,560 0 `i M (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column E Total acres for travel lane length (1,1) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel large length (L, _ interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) {Pull length ]feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, T Interior or _____Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length_ ]feet] X Wetted width [feet]l / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (1-3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3 (a (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X I # Lanes =6, Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 3, (0 ( Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: &� �i""�"`" Date: 6,za'0 6 Signature of technical specialist �1� (Midfipfe worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) �1 ) 3 z Field number (identification) (V fl F o) Z. irrigation system designation -I- )existing irrigation system — New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 55`C feet] Length of pull(L1) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 5 Sa' [feet] Length of pull(L2) # interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet} Length of pull(1,3) 4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet Loe.+A•Ed ;,�; A", = 2--71 5. Spacing `I 0 Hydrant spacing [feet] _ [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant -( Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L_) Interior or X Exterior Oane/hydrant) D, 1 15 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table t 7 U Column 13 3. `1 Z (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) (Pull lengths50 [feet] X Wetted widths--111 [feet]) / 43,560 0- 4 I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table EE i C Column 6 y •� Total acres for travel lane length (Ll) (Sums: a + b + c) (0-2 Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or k Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0 + 9 15, (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E C- 7D Column B 3, 4 Z (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull IengtYrSSo [feet] X Wetted width Z-'71 [feet]) 143,560 ti Ll I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E G '10 Column 4E' 4, '-75- Total acres for travel lane length (LZ) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L,) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. ..�5 (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X [ # Lanes = "A75 Acres (0`1 T (b) Acres per travel lane length (i.2) X I # lanes = cl .7 S Acres 6, -L (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres + - S 0 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: � 1�- Date: �-yZ-06 Signature of technical specialist -y T hc-t+..Aes oil FId `7 (Multiple worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 1 3 Field number (identification) J `� 2. Irrigation system designation �c Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes n 5[y feet] Length of pull(Ll) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes T # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pu11(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 35- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet iN i } e d w _• A+V, , Z-7 1 ' 5. Spacing Z H 0 Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout _____ Multiple hydrants X Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 5-1 Travel lane length (L_) Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) c� p ( `67— (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E I 0 -' Column 7 4^�2- (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1,1) (Pull length(o�(D [feet] X Wetted width '271 Ifeet]f / 43,560 `i ! (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table C �I D • Column E 5, 9 & Total acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length Ifeet] X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. S, 46 (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X f #Lanes Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # banes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres S, 9 � Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: C-ti^-r� Date: 4-22.06 Signature of teciuvcal specialist `• 15J • (Multiple worksheets map be needed) HARD HOSC TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 1312 Field number (identification) 4 V4 fi',Ji ) 2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system — New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes. # Exterior lanes 315 feet] Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes x # Exterior lanes L125 [feet] Length of pull(LZ) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(13) 4. Wetted diameter 335"- [feet] from Field Data Worksheet ►,.n-i -6.; i'tt+ = 2-71' 5. Spacing '240 Hydrant spacing [feet] '70 [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout * Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. y - I Travel lane length (L, Interior or x Exterior (lane/hydrant) e 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table LF 70 Column 13 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) [Pull length3l S [feet] X Wetted width27l [feet][ / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table FF 70 Column F 3.2q Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) =[ - Travel lane length (L_) _Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0. Q1 S- (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FF7 D Column 2 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2.) {Pull length 25 [feet] X Wetted width �7 [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table HF7d Column F 3` y 7 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_) _ Interior or _Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) JPull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet][ 143,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X I # Lanes = _ 3•' 2y Acres 3' 7 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X 1 # Lanes = g 7 Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = Acres 2-& Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80 Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Signature of technical specialist �J Date: 4- 22- D 6 (Mulliple worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) 3 Field number (identification) L YA Fid) 2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system _ Newlexpanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes 1 # Exterior lanes 1 LG' feet] Length of pull(LI) # Interior lanes 1 # Exterior lanes y tab' [feet] Length of pull(LZ) # Interior lanes I # Exterior lanes 2q 0[feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 3 [feet) from Field Data Worksheet we-, t+e A Lu,`A.Aµ„ = 2-7 1 5. Spacing Z 4 0 Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants — Single hydrant r Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and colurnn based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. 3-1 Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or 4 Exterior (lane/hydrant) 6 j 'l f 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E E 70 Column 0.75 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1) (Pull lengthLLI(, [feet] X Wetted width'2--i I [feet]] 1 43,560 `l 1 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Cz f- 7 L Column C Z, 0 g Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Z Travel lane length (L, ^ Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) C1 q 1 S (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 7 C Column 13 Z e y (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LZ) {Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width?7 t_ [feet]} / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table G -70 Column E 3: V 1 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Surn: a + b + c) 3-3 Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or -X-Exterior (lane/hydrant) G' GZ (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 1 Column 8 i (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull lengthri 0 [feet] X Wetted width 2-11 [feet]) / 43,560 pLl I (c) Acres stop end of pull from Tabled Column E 3. b 3 Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 2. 016 (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X # Lanes = Z.'0'e Acres 3 $ i (b) Acres per travel lane length (LZ) X I # Lanes = 3,V1 Acres . C 3 (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X i # Lanes = 3 t 0 3 Acres �% 9 Z Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: Sa + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: &.R- rl - Date: 6` 2-2-o 6 Signature of technical specialist i15 (Whiple 3voiksheets moy be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET 1. Farm number (identification) T 13 L`h Field number (identification) HART] HOSE TRAVLLM iRRiGATJOV� SYSTEM ( V ft F- I A) 2. Irrigation system designation T Existing irrigation system _ New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes _ # Exterior lanes lff95 feet] Length of pull(Ll) i # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes �($s- [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 9SS [feet] Length of pull(L3) iv, ti 4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet S. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] Las a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout — Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L, _Interior Interior or X Exterior (lane/hydrant) 0 , 5 75 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table ail L L' Column 5.51 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) {Pull length$ [feet] X Wetted width Z21 [feet]} / 43,560 0- .Z (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table tikV Column L- lv ; � Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) 1—'Z Travel lane length (L, V' interior or Exterior (lane hydrant) G ,535- (a) Acres start end of pull from Table N.1 to C7 Column 5, 5� (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) [Pull length'?ASS` [feet] X Wetted width 2-7 1 [feet] f / 43,560 q 0, 2 3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N t & 0 Column � 6 1 DTotal acrr_:s for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) 1 — 5 Travel lane length (Lj Interior or Exterior (lane hydrant) d . 53t (a) Acres start end of pull from Table N y & 0 Column 13 UZ (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet) X Wetted width [feet]) / 43,560 Z3 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table N . (c 0 Column P'\\ 44 -7-- 6 . Z $ y Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 3 � (a) Acres per travel lane length (Ll) X ( # Lanes = ` 3 Acres G . Z `d (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres 3 J'' _ (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X l # Lanes = 3, 1 Acres } 5 ,11 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 9—� �✓ Date: &22-Di Signature of technical specialist (Midliple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WOR SHEET HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1. Farm number (identification) T 115 3 Field number (identification) 10 (PC r,- c\ A 2. irrigation system designation _ Existing irrigation system — New expanded irrigation System 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes X # Exterior lanes feet] Length of pull(L1) YZ 4ro UK # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(U) # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(1-3) 4. Wetted diameter 315` [feet] from Field Data Worksheet we4�44 %,idat. = 2`71" S. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants -)L- Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. head the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L, — Interior or k Exterior (lane/hydrant) lopQ f2- (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F904 Column !3 r 2.0 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L.1) ai F (Pull length310 [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560 Tl^•a w 0, 41 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Fg0 + Column F fr 1l = 1. 2 3 N ate' = 1. 6 2 �Z Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or _Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]] / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres muddle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (1.3) (Sum: a + b + c) S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X 1 # Lanes = I b Z Acres (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes - Acres 1 �Z Total CAWIITP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: !°."—`�Date: Signature of technical specialist f � (Multiple worksheets may be needed) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD HOSE- TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTLM 1. Farm number (identification) T 1 35 Field number (identification) j I (M F',Q lc 2, lrrigation system designation X Existing irrigation system — New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes P40 feet] Length of pull(Ll) I # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes L l 0 [feet] Length of pull(L2) # Interior lanes # Exterior lades [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 335 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet wr-1414 �.-; a it 1 2-7i ' 5. Spacing G 0 Hydrant spacing [feet] 60 [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout X Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L_) X Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres Start end of pull from Table �" 160 Column— (b) (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll) 'T�1r'J 11 {Pull length 11 d [feet] X Wetted width'-`11 [feet]} J 43,560 D• 23 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table FI' G U Column L F 11 : 1.& 3 H. 4= D. g I 8 2 Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L, _ Interior or X Exterior aane/hydrant) 0.1 b (a) Acres start end of pull from Table FEE 0 Column [ 1' 12- 047 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) F,%, [Pull lengthy [feet] X Wetted width 2-71 [feet]} / 43,560 T 6vD up V • 37 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table IF 60 Column f 2 , 1 Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L-) T Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) {Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} J 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. V. g 2- (a) Acres per travel lane length (Li) X i # Lanes - 0 "Y 2 Acres -2 l (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X 1 # Lanes - 2 0 Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes - Acres I. y Z Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: e�zy �/`'^- Date: 2 d 6 Signature of technical specialist 75 (Wiliple wofkslieels May be i7ceded) Hard Hose Traveling Gun System COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET HARD 1-10SC TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTIM 1. Farm number (identification) T 13 53 Field number (identification) ) Z (M 5u 1l 2. Irrigation system designation X Existing irrigatioii system New/expanded irrigation system 3. Number of travel lanes # interior lanes X # Exterior lanes 5 40 feet] Length of pull(Li) y +Li, v # Interior lanes V # Exterior lanes 4 [feet] Length of pull(L2) Mull cl cle- # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3) 4. Wetted diameter 33 5 [feet] from Field Data Worksheet ve-4 " is+�x - 2-?1 ' 5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter] 6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants 7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location. Travel lane length (L, interior or __Y.- Exterior (lane/hydrant) Q Y2 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E1d+ Column 34 (p) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) Wa1f {Pull length S4O [feet] X Wetted width ^221 [feet][ / 43,560 w VV 0• 41 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Fcio ; Column F F-1ti - K, Sq H,14 . 2.30 2 � Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L-) _ Interior or XExterior (lane/hydrant) Z - I A (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column FL'li (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2) {Pull length L [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column 9 y Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c) Travel lane length (L_ _ Interior or Exterior Oane/hydrant) (a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3) (Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet][ / 43,560 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c) 8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. 2-36 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X 1 # Lanes - Z'• 3 Acres `l `l (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes - Acres (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes - Acres Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c) Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: 6" ��`"�� Date: G L7'D 6 Signature of technical specialist Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures for Wastewater Application Equipment Table EE70. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Exterior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 70 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/ stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) - B) (C) ...,.. D),.. (E) _ (E) 150 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.13 0.15 160 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.17 170 0.24 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.19 180 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.22 190 0.29 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.21 0.24 200 0.33 0.00 0.07 0.15 0,24 0,27 210 0.36 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.26 0.29 220 0.40 0.00 0.08 0.18 0.29 0.32` 230 0.43 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.31 0.35 240 0.47 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.34 0.38 250 0.51 0.00 0.11 0,23 0.37 0.42 260 0.55 0.00 0.12 0.25 0.40 0.45 270 0.60 0.00 0.12 0,27 0.43 0.49 280 0.64 0,00 0.13 0.29 0.46 0,52 290 0,69 0.00 0.14 0.31 0.50 0.56 300 0.74 0.00 0.15 0.33 0.53 0.60 310 0.78 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.57 0.64 320 0.64 0.00 O.1B 0.37 0,61 0,68 /330 0.89 9+� 0.00 0.19 0.40� 0Iy 1 0.64 0.73 340 0.94 0.00 0.20 0.42 0.68 0.77 350 1.00 0.00 0.21 0.45 0.72 0.62 360 1.06 0.00 0.22 0.47 0.77 0.86 370 1.12 0.00 0.23 0.50 0.81 0.91 380 1.18 0.00 0.25 0.53 0.85 0.96 390 1.24 0.00 0.26 0.56 0.90 1.01 400 1.31 0.00 0.27 0.59 0.95 1.07 410 1.37 0.00 0.29 0.62 0.99 1.12 420 1.44 0.00 0.30 0.65 1.04 1,18 430 1.51 0.00 0,32 0.68 1.09 1.23 440 1.58 0.00 0.33 0.71 _.. ..,__ _.,.._.._1.14_._. ..w .�. 450 1,65 0.00 0.35 0.74 1.20 1.35 460 1.73 0.00 036 0.77 1,25 1.41 470 1.80 0.00 0.38 0.81 1.31 1.47 480 1.88 0.00 0.39 0.84 1.36 1.54 490 1.96 0.00 0,41 0.88 1.42 1.60 500 2.04 0.00 0.43 0.91 1.48 1.67 78 HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGAMON SYSTEM Table E170. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Interior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 70 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/ stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle atc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees 150 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.11 0.13 160 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.15 170 0.21 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.15 0,17 180 0.24 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.16 0.19 190 0,26 0.00 0.04 0.10 0.18 0.21 200 0.29 0.00 MS 0.11 0.20 0,23 210 0,32 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.22 0.26 220 0.35 0,00 0.06 0.14 0.25 0.28 230 0.39 0.00 0.06 0.15 0.27 0.31 240 0.42 0.00 0.07 0.16 0.29 0.34 250 0.46 0100 0.07 0.18 0.32 0.36 260 0.49 0.00 0.08 0.19 0.34 0.39 270 0.53 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.37 0.42 280 0.57 0.00 0.09 0,22 0.40 0.46 290 0.62 0.00 0.10 0.24 0,43 0,49 300 0.66 0.00 0.10 0.25 0.46 0.52 310 0.70 0.00 0.11 0.27 0.49 0.56 320 0.75 0.00 0.12 0.29 0.52 0.60 �� /330 `340 0,80\ �,4y 0.8510. 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.31 0.32 �� 0.55 0.59 0,63 0.67 350 0.90 - _ 0.00 0.14 0.34 0.62 �Y 0.71 360 0.95 0.00 0,15 0.36 0.66 0.75 370 1.00 0.00 0,16 0.38 0.69 0.80 380 1.06 0.00 0.17 0.41 0.73 0.84 390 1.11 0.00 0.18 0.43 0.77 Us 400 1.17 0.00 0.19 0.45 0.81 0.93 410 1.23 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.85 0.99 420 1.29 0.00 0.21 0.50 0.89 1.03 430 1.35 0.00 0.22 0,52 0,94 1.08 440 1.42 0.00 0.23 0.54 0.98 1.13 450 1.48 0.00 0.24 0.57 1.03 1.18 460 1.55 0.00 0.25 0.59 1.07 1.23 470 1.62 0.00 0.26 0.62 1.12 1.28 480 1.69 0.00 0.27 0,65 1.17 1,34 490 1.76 0.00 0.28 0.68 1.22 1.40 S00 1.83 0.00 0.29 0.70 1.27 1.45 f2S Irrigated Acreage Determination Procedures for Wastewater Application Equipment Table E90+. Area Allowances for Existing Hard Hose Traveler Systems Fields with single pull or multiple pulls and Hydrant spacing greater than 90 percent of verified wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted - - d area m __ arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) (B) (C) (D) lB) (F'1 G _ l ) 150 0,16 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.14 160 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.16 170 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.16 0.18 180 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.20 190 0.26 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.20 0.22 200 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.15 0.22 0.24 210 0.32 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.27 220 0.35 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.29 230 0.39 0.00 0.10 0.19 0.29 0.32 240 0.42 0.00 0.11 0.21 0.32 0.35 250 0.46 0.00 0.11 0.23 0.34 0.38 260 0.49 0.00 0.12 0.25 0.37 0.41 270 0.53 0.00 0,13 0.27 OA0 0.44 280 0.57 0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.48 290 0,61 0.00 0.15 0.31 0.46 0.51 300 0.66 0.00 OA6 0.33 0.49 0.55 310 0.70 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.53 0.58 320 US 0.00 0.19 0,37 0,56 0.62 s- /330 0.80) o sz 0.00 0.20 0.40� C, j ` 0.60 0.66 \ 340 0.84 0.00 0.21 0.42 0.63 0.70 350 0.89 0.00 0.22 0.45 0.67 0.75 360 0.95 0.00 0,74 0.47 0.71 0.79 370 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 0.83 360 1.05 0.00 026 0.53 0.79 0.88 390 1.11 0.00 0.28 0.56 0.83 0.93 400 1.17 0.00 0,29 0.58 0.88 0.97 410 1.23 0.00 0.31 0.61 0.92 1.02 420 1.29 0.00 0.32 0.64 0.97 1.07 430 1.35 0.00 0.34 0.68 1.01 1.13 440 1.41 0.00 0.35 0.71 1.06 1.18 450 1.48 0.00 0.37 0.74 1.11 1.23 460 1.55 0.00 0.39 0.77 1.16 1.29 470. 1.61 0.00 0.40 0.81 1.21 1.34 480 1.68 0.00 0.42 0.84 1.26 1,40 490 1.75 0,00 0.44 0.88 1.32 1.46 S00 1.83 0.00 0.46 0.91 1.37 1.52 130) HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Table N160. Area Allowances for New or Expanded Hard Hose Traveler Systems Interior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 60 percent of wetted diameter (Acreage is outside'starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G 150 0.11 0.00 0.02 0,05 0.08 0.09 160 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.10 170 0.14 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.1.0 0.11 180 0.15 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.11 0.13 190 0.17 0.00 0,03 0.07 0.12 0.14 200 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.14 0.15 210 0.21 0.00 0,04 0.09 0.15 0.17 220 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.10 0.17 0.19 230 0.25 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.18 0,20 240 0.28 0.00 0.05 0.12 .0.20 0.22 250 0.30 0.00 0.05 0.13 0.21 0.24 260 0.32 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.23 0.26 270 0.35 0.00 0.06 0.15 0.25 0.28 280 0.37 0.00 0.07 0.16 0.27 0.30 290 0.40 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.29. 0.33 300 0.43 0.00 0.08 �0.18 0.31 M 0,35 310 0.46 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.33 0.37 320 0.49 0.00 0.09 0.21 0.35 0.40 3 /330 0.52> $ 3 5 0.00 0.09 0,22 � C, 2-'3 0.37 0.42 \ 340 0.55 0.00 0,10 0.24 0.39 0.45 350 0.59 _ 0.00W Y 0.10 0.25 0.42 0.47 360 0.62 0.00 0.11 0.26 0.44 0.50 370 0.65 0.00 0.12 0.28 0.47 0.53 380 0.69 0.00 0.12 0.29 0.49 0.56 390 0.73 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.52 0.59 400 0.76 0.00 0.14 0.33 0.55 0.62 410 0.80 0.00 0.14 0.34 0.57 0.65 420 0.84 0.00 0.15 0,36 0.60 0.68 430 0.98 0.00 0.16 0.38 0.63 0.71 440 0.93 0.00 0.17 0.39 �4----0'66-=� -.- 0.75 450 0.97 0.00 0.17 0.41 0.69� 0.78 460 1.01 0.00 0.18 0.43 0.72 0.82 470 1.06 0.00 0.19 0.45 0.75 0.85 480 1.10 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.79 0.89 490 1,15 0.00 0,21 0.49 0.82 0.93 500 1.20 0.00 0.21 0.51 0.85 0.97 `5 3 HARD HOSE TRAVELER IRRIGATION SYSTEM Table NE60. Area Allowances for New or Expanded Hard Hose Traveler Systems Exterior lane in fields with multiple overlapping lanes: Hydrant spacing based on 60 percent of wetted diameter (Acreage is outside starting/stopping gun location) wetted start end stop end wetted area (acres) diameter wetted d area arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle arc angle (feet) (acres) 180 degrees 225 degrees 270 degrees 315 degrees 330 degrees _ (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F). (G) 150 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.09 160 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.06 0,10 0.11 170 0.15 0.00 0.03 0,07 0.11 0.12 180 0,17 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0,14 190 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.14 0.15 200 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.10 0.15 0.17 210 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.19 220 0.25 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.18 0.20 230 0.27 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.22 240 0.30 OM 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.24 250 0,32 0.00 0.07 0.15 0.24 0.26 260 0.35 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.25 0.29 270 0.37 0.00 0,08 0.17 0.27 0.31 280 0.40 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.29 0.33 290 0.43 0.00 0.09 0.20 0.32 0.35 300 0.46 0.00 0.10 0.22 0.34 0.38 310 0.49 0.00 0.11 0.23 0.36 0.41 320 0.53 0.00 0.11 0.24 0.39 0.43 3S�T l 330 0.56� 575 0.00 0.12 0.26\ 'G� 0.41 0.46 340 0.59 0.00 0.13 0,28 / 0.43 0.49 350 0.63' 0.00 0.14 0.29 0.46 0,52 360 0.67 0.00 0.14 0.31 0,49 0.55 370 0.70 0.00 0.15 0,33 0.51 0.58 380 0,74 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.54 0.61 390 0.78 0.00 0.17 0.36 0.57 0.64 400 0.82 0.00 0.18 0.38 0.60 0.69 410 0.96 0.00 0.19 0.40 0.63 0.71 420 0.91 0.00 0.20 0.42 0.66 0.74 430 0.95 0.00 0.21 0.44 0.70 0.78 440 0.99 0.00 0.22 0,46 0.73 0.82 450 1.04 0.00 0.23 0,48 0.76 0.85 460 1.09 0,00 0.24 0.51 0.80 0.89 470 1.13 0.00 0.25 0.53 0.63 0.93 480 1.18 0.00 0,26 0.55 0.87 0.97 490 1,23 0.00 0.27 0.57 0.90 1.01 500 1.28 0,00 0.28 0,60 0.94 1.05 Arthur Holt King -- Wettable Acres Summary VA Fields - These fields will not be included if the farm is sold. Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1339 1-1 6.68 1-2 5.99 1-3 2.99 15.66 1339 2-1 1.50 2-2 4.57 6.07 1342 3-1 2.08 3-2 3.81 3-3 3.03 1342 4-1 —2-3J- 3.7-11 4-2 '&-63 3.00 -&G2` '] . 2 (� 1342 5-1 5.46 5.46 1342 6-1 4.75 6-2 4.75 9.50 1342 8-1 3.66 3.66 1342 9-1 5.58 5.5$ Vp,� NLam, .�fl Cl. X,J\-�' .,0� Arthur Holt King -- Wettable Acres Summary (pg2) These fields will be included if the farm is sold. *New VA Field Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1341 1-1 6.36 1-2 6.28 1-3 3.14 15.78 NC Fields Tract Field/Pull Wetted Pull Acres Total Wetted Field Acres 1353 14-1 -44-2- l - 6 Z 1353 11-1 4760- O • g �- 11- 2 2.1 0 -�-6� 2 • �t 2 1353 12-1 +..s2 �.8 Total Wetted Acres available if farm is sold = -21.02 23. I W A T �RQG Arthur H. King Arthur H. King Rt 1 Box 110-X Warrenton NC 27589 Dear Arthur H. King: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P, E., Director Division of Water Quality October 1, 2004 Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS930014 Arthur H. King Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Warren County On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28). In accordance with your application received on March 3, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Arthur H. King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS930014 which expires October 1, 2004. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Arthur H. King, located in Warren County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 500 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. _Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. 0 Aquifer Protection Section —Animal Feeding Operations Unit 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 Phone: 919-733-32211 FAX: 919-715-0588 J Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper NorthCarolina Aawrally If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is • inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must .submit documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility. ' Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water . supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. if you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 571-4700. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at (919) 715-6186. Sincerely, for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ce's) Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section Warren County Health Department Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File AWS930014 APS Central Files ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN • Producer: Location: Telephone: Type Operation: Number of Animals: (Design Capacity) STORAGE STRUCTURE: APPLICATION METHOD: Arthur Holt King Rt. 1 Box 110C Warrenton NC 27589-9502 (252)456-4377 Existing Farrow to Feeder Swine 500.00 sows Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon Irrigation The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the,limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be • balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner: 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 40 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, .or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations. Pace: 1 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN . 5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to.have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental • Management. Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 500 sows x 7.3 tons waste/saws/year = 3650 tons 0 AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 500 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 3250 lbs. PAN/year Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. Page: 2 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN • TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED -_--- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC 3 METH N TIME 1342 32B FHG 3.8 142.5 0 7.0 997.5 ,I MAR - :TUNE , AUG - N 1342 IBH 4.0 _ 14 13211 1200 10 13.0 1600 - OCT 1342 5 32B IBH 14.0 0 I 1200 14.0 11200 APRIL- OCT 1342 7 1 32B IBH 14.0 1200 0 I 12.0 1400 APRIL- ��Z�l.1 U42 FHG 285 18 132B 13.8 1142.5 �0 12.0 MAR- JUNE,AUG -N 1342 9 32B FHG li 13.8 142.5 1 d 1-8.0 i 1 j 11140 MAR - JUNE,AUG-N 1339 1 32B IBH 0 12.0 I 14.0 1200 12400 APRIL- 0CT 1339 2 32B FHG 3.8 142.5 0 18.0 11140 I MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 12 32E SOY 135.0 1175 1 2.0 1350 I APRIL- AUG 1353 32B SOY 35.0 175 1 13.0 1525 13-1 I APRIL- AUG 53 —�11 32B 1 W 45 1108 10 13.0 1324 Page: 3 ANIMAL, WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 0 1 1 iI 1 1 1 I 1UAG- NOV,MAR-MA 135311. 32B FHH 4.5 225 0 675I 13A MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 12 32B IW 45 1108 0 2.0 1216 I AUG- NOV,MAR-MA END I TOTAL110252.5 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a • nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. 0 Page: 4 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRA T FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------ APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END • Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e winter annuals follow summer annuals. TOTAL10 interplanted) or ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied, The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS PER UNIT FHG FESCUE HAY - GRAZED TONS 37.5 FHH FESCUE HAY - HAY TONS 50 IBH IMPROVED BERMUDAGRASS - HAY 50 SOY SOYBEANS BU 5 W WHEAT 2,40 TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 . 4 ACRES I LBS AW N USED Page: 5 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN • TABLE I. 'TABLE 2 TOTAL • • 59 0 59 10252.5 I 10252.5 *** BALANCE 1-7002.5 ------------------- *** Thais number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN • TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP JYIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH hY TIME 1342 3 32B FHG 3.8 142.5 0 7.0 997.5 I MAR- JUNE-AUG-N 13424 32B IBH 4.0 200 I jo 13.0 1600 APRIL- OCT 1342 32B IBH d 14.0 1 I 14.0 1200 1800 APRIL- OCT 1342 7 32B IBH �4.0 0 2.0 I 1200 1400 APRIL- OCT 42 32B - FHG 0 T I I 13.8 1142.5 12.0 1285 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 9 32B FHG 0 I 13.8 1142.5 18.0 11140 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1339 1. 32B IBH 14.0 200 0 12.0 12400 I APRIL- OCT 1339 2 32B FHG 0 I �3.8 1142.5 18.0 11140 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 12 32B C 195.0 76 1 0 12.0 1152 I 1 MAR-JULY 1353 12 32B W �45 1108 Q I 12.0 1216 AUG- NOV,MAR-MA 1353 11 32B E95.0 176 0 to IC I I 13.0 122R MAR-JULY Page: 3 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 1353 I32B !W 0 Ill �45 �1.Q8 13.0 AUG- NOV,MAR-MAf 1353 11 32B FHH 225 3.Q 675 a k =14.5 MAR— JUNE,AUG-N END I TOTAL19357.5 - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 4 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 0 TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED -_--- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END 0 TOTAL10 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS IPER UNIT C CORN BU .80 FHG FESCUE HAY - GRAZED TONS 37.5 FHH FESCUE HAY - HAY TONS 50 IBK IMPROVED BERMUDAGRASS - HAY 50 W WHEAT 2.40 TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 0 1 ACRES I LBS AW N USED Page: 5 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 0 TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TOTAL 59 0 59 *** BALANCE. 9357.5 0 9357.5 _6107.5 1 ------------------- *** Th."s number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. L] Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 0 • WASTE UTXLXZAXZgNPLARAGREEMEN1 Name of Farm:Arthur King Swine Farm Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: Arthur Holt King (Please print) Signature: 0 Date: Name of Manager(If different from owner): Signature: Date: Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson Affiliation:Narren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257- 3836 Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St. Warrenton NC 27589 signature: c. I ~ Date: Page: 13 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQIIIRED 9PECIFICAT1ONS 18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. Zg. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with.no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22, Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste . products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. • 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. Page: 12 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPEgIFICAJIMS 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property • and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into -water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover.of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should. be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. Page: 11 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN RE UIR D SPECIFICATIMS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year • providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip) 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9'. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such . a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. Page: 10 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN • it is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. NARRATIVE QF OPERATIOPJ 0 Page: 9 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN •amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. Tract Field Soil Type Crop Application Rate (in/hr) Applic. Amount (inches) 1339 1 32B IBH .40 *.75 1339 2 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 3 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 4 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 5 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 7 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 8 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 9 32B FHG .40 *.75 j153 1353 — 11 32B FHH .40 *.75 11 32B SOY .40 *.75 1353 11 32B W .40 *.75 1353 12 32B SOY .40 *.75 1353 12 32B W .40 *.75 * This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. Your facility is designed for 150.00 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in .your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. Page: 8 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along -ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables. See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste. SLUDGE APPLICATION: The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 550 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the sludge. If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2750 pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 9.16666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22 acres of land. Please be aware that these are,only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25t depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application methods. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at'the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is :limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of :irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an :irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and Page: 7 I State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary '! Kerr T. Stevens, Director October 18, 1999, Arthur H. King Rt 1 Box 110-X Warrenton NC 27589 1 �101WA IT • NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS930014 Arthur H. King Farm Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Warren County Dear Arthur King: In accordance with your application received on February 8, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Arthur H. King, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal. waste from the Arthur H. King Farm, located in Warren County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 500 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Certificate of Coverage AWS930014 Arthur H. King Page 2 This COC is not automatically transferable. A narje/ownership change application must be submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. A If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the ■ right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on this process. Unless such a -request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 571-4700. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at (919) 733-5083 ext. 363. Sincerely, —. Kerr T. Stevens cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) Warren County Health Department Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File NDPU Files DEHNR RALEIGH REGIGINAL OFFICE - State -of -North Carolina ------ Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge; Permit Application Form (THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave ` any question unanswered. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.1 Facility Name: Arthur l-1. King - 1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Arthur H. Kine 1.3 Mailing address: Rt 1 Box 1 10-X City, State: Warrenton NC Zip: 27589 Telephone Number (include area code): 919-456-4377 1.4 County where facility is located: Warren 1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway, Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Wise NC take SR 1300 to the Va State Line and take a Left (Va. 712) at Va. State Line and go 150 yds. to White Columns on the left. Go through the columns and follow the farm road to the end. 1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): 1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed) 1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/80 1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): 2. OPERATION INFORMATION: Carroll's Foods Inc 2A Facility No.: 93 (county number); 14 (facility number). 2.2 Operation Desc it ion: Swine operation Farrow to Feeder 500- Certified Design Capacity Is the above infurn,ation correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum ntnnber for which the waste management structures were designed. Type of Swine No. of Animals 'type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals 0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy 0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef 0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey 0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow) 0 Farrow to Finish (# sow) Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals: FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 93 - 14 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by they application + system): 60.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the.AWMP): 14 2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):. l .y w 2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? l Yam/ or V(please please circle one) 2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or circle one) 2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only) ES or NO (please circle one) What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? /9g� What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST ` Please indicate that you leave -included -the following required items by signing your initials in ttie-space"pfovided-next to each -' item. A licants Initials 3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal Waste Operations; 3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and field locations where animal waste is land applied; 3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components: 3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility. 3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.) •-3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application. 3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field. 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field. 3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP. 3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. 3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP. /,3� 19 The required NRCS Standard specifications. ' 3 3.10 A site schematic. 3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan. 3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. - 3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.' 3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted. 3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility. 3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan, If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal. FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 93 - 14 Pf R Tel Y µ+ wf A Yly k Facility Number: 93 - 14 Facility Name: Arthur H. King 4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: 4 i• 1, (% %�. /nl(a' (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that this application for y(1/� /. /��jlG` _ (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returne d too me as incomplete. Signature �t��-, V Date 5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: -(complete only if different from the Land Owner) 1, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this ..application for _ (Facility name listed in -question 1.1) . has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as incomplete. Signature Date THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY SECTION NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT POST OFFICE BOX 29535 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083 FAX NUMBER: (919) 733-0719 FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 93 - 14 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Producer: Arthur Holt King Location; Rt 1 Box 110C Warrenton NC 27589 Telephone: { 3310 (la) (zSZ) q 5C.- y 3 `t 1 (r---- ) Type Operation: Existing Farrow to Feeder Swine Number of Animals: 500.00 sows (Design Capacity) STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed.before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner: 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water hold.i:ng capacities. 3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations. Page: 1 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 5. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production '- and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 1.5A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 500 sows x 7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 3650 tons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 500 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 3250 lbs. PAN/year Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. Page: 2 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS " DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID.. APPLIC METH N TIME 1339 1 36B BGH 4.0 200 0 16.0 3200 I MAY-SEP 1339 j2 FHG 136B I 14.8 1180 10 I11.0 �19 R80 APR,SEP 1342 3 36B FHG 0 I �4.8 �180 �9.0 �1620 MAR - APR, SEP 1342 4 36B BGH __[0 4.0 I 14.0 1200 �800 MAY-SEP 1342 5 36B BGH 0 I �4.0 1200 16.0 �1200 MAY-SEP 1342 6 36B BGH Q I 14.0 �200 17.0 �1400 MAY-SEP 1342 7 36B BGH 200 0 li �4.0 �3.0 1600 MAY-SEP 1342 8 36B FHH 0 ____3._0 I 14.8 1240 17-20 MAR -- APR,SEP 1342 9 3613 -^ -'- FHG _0.__ - -,11.0 1980 I �4.8 �180 IMAR- APR,SEP 1353 11 36B FHH 0 T 14.8 1240 13.5 1840 MAR- APR,SEP 1353 12 36B 0.6 IC T �95.0 1111.7517 167-05 MAR- APR,JUL 1353 -12 136B jw 145.0 1108 10 1.2' 1129.6 Page: 3 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN II I I I I IsEP- •NOV,MAR A 1353 �12 136B SOY 135.0 0 0 �0.6 0 I MAY END I TOTAL114536.6 - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements: In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 4 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE y (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ------- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END TOTALI0 Indicates that -this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE --- CROP ---UNITS PER UNIT BGH BERMUDAGRASS - HAY TONS 50 C CORN BU 1.25 FHG FESCUE HAY - GRAZED TONS 37.5 FHH FESCUE HAY - HAY TONS 50 SOY SOYBEANS BU 0 W WHEAT BU 2.4 TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 Page: 5 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TOTAL, ACRES LBS AW N USED 74.7 14536.65 0 0 74.7 14536.65 * BALANCE -11286.65 *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to Fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables. See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste. SLUDGE APPLICATION: The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 550 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the sludge. If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2750 pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 9.16666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22 acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25a depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application methods. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and Page: 7 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. r The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. Tract I Field I Soil Type I 1339 I 1 I 36B 1339 12 I 36B '1342 I 13 I 36B 1342 I 14 I 36B 1342 I 15 I 36B 1342 I 16 36B 1342 I 17 I 36B 1342 8 f 36B 1342 I 19 I 36B 1353 I 111 I 36B crop BGH I (Application I (in/hr) I I 0.40 I RatejApplic. Amount I (inches) I *0.75 FHG I 0.40 I *0.75 FHG i 0.40 I *0.75 � BGH I I 0.40 I *0.75 BGH i I 0.40 1 *0.75 BGH I I 0.40 I *0.75 BGH I 0.40 I *0.75 I FHH I I 0.40 I *0.75 FHG 0.40 *0.75 I FHH I I 0.40 I I *0.75 Page: 8 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 1353 1 1 12 1 i 1353 12 1 1353 i 1 -12 1 1 .: k.: 36B SOY 1 0 C WI 0.40 *0 * 0 . 7 5 1 *0.75 1 * This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. Your facility is designed for 1.80.00 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may ---- make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis -report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. NARRATIVE OF OPERATION ,f The lagoon dam needs to be kept free of trees e-i-L, �L A9K Page: 9 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 --Filter Strip) 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. &. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 'Page: - 10 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a_man_ner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. - 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, -sinks, etc., shall not be discharged --into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. Page -. - . 11 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. - __ -- Page: 12 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT Name of Farm: Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on --site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: Arthur Holt King (Please print) Signature: Date:Z�L, - I V Name of Manager (If different from owner) : Signature: Date: Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)DAVE LITTLE Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 257--3836 Address (Agency): 133 1/2 S MAIN ST WARRENTON NC 27589 Signature : Date: S/r��Q ^_ -page: 13 iT35 4` � � ♦ c .t. e. ,TT Uri rl im4 it Etr J a qwa A.� FM Fi I am TWL gig, . e. ii Ff _ • r-'Tf °7 III i5� 9 ' �••� 4„I•J V TYi 4a Z fFl S L 7M q[ I I or —.qa •S y � S r. � wwl>♦r•d II rQ wi l 9l a091 I t, � Z5w �I! sill Y i v/Ys IIWI am t'l IpN e.w� t 3 YONV ,:� mil 1 TM Yt O � YWl /' J�Frj '. aML l 1 td�J ry[ Cr •i. q.t iiif 4 r'I !L Y • l'a IruN aCi nu•glj C 4 Tlite°Vd lf� Sat YM n ityl eocl S+ t3 [ q'I ri f.a o, a Im r TS:Y nigh or Lill ` W ° g r[ �r .y Sye Tr1-1 d/J CC T 66C 9S 7`y TM to to z Yr a °.r pan TSB , W-1 4 / t r•,.. :' [ � I t fod 'dQd P fr _ [ `l.l.. 0 1 v i T6� z NC1NHNYM * t .rye sill 6 lvv i'I rL r L! TII Au,rysl'I w°�i .t" 1-1ri TMcoil T �I � YSI o vn Yld if 291 MI SM � 331 j ?oti I cicl y llTf TiZ 1'STP F 1 >, s i5ff p� [aTf zci [ 1 for U7L v NO�r`rr ;r TJSfi 1 9Sl MTor< tSl ♦ Y X�� lOF fOJ 11 ue ari rm 6'aAt t r'Nn*ON 4--spIY CYM AV r q' I L • �'• 1L9I TM TT[T TaiS Tl'[T "4.w uw°M t {:> a -< Fit C P. iy 4 T61- TM ` Yrr Ytii ar 0 Pm •3ar[I S� %4s cicl - a poi[l I S. C N 9LTI 4 IT ct' 'n tl � s L'Ti rice ,r � X1N 4--0 Grim WTS tltj ilLi it a $ • - �� ! •y'y` M1 - s' c:cl o -. °lTl it[i :3Tj T 5- SILI a' Wn ° F y b -P�J —A n a. r ', • a a0[1 L i iil 3 �� e5xi Q _ r i t . '��tS��\� ��• ba-I iT•F r Zarr Xr»w°d .lar, X �,,` •�� M s Nf1'd B m A 1 N n 0] v 04 n eN) I ]3w :)R -� 'F�Or� � %i" \r' ;..�:� w t � / M..'_-�-�� ♦ ,j1 � r -- WAR•I2EN CO - T•f�`' 1 - •i� . { ��'�';��i �•_'�--`��. (R� �� � fir- , ;;�. .. � �/ \_,��_ �.. i '�_.--�-�Jf�`1 �.)4>! JO �1\ ;,ro, -' •�•,+/9� v: Cem _� '� �r `�J _�-, . .29) JI Jerusalem' Co ' zii. �( f �r ���\�, r ' w r � � •! f L'�1�``\`\ - \�/� � C2m. et a �,�%�,� _ � -- ' 7. �.,�= ��, it � '� • •�,\ ,r�', �� M�333 Nnrth rqn High,S h;, Cr ,' -- ! n• •\` _I _ _ __�:`. ustovcrf u 13 30 �.. •_ --- ... — r 250000 F•EEi;N,C (WARREN TON) 't wr•: r. r, l0' 754 ��,�56 •� EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN P ' N N �.tiviB ER S D` Q � rR s" r- 417oo ENIERGENCY M.-kiNAGEYLENT SYSTEM SWCD ,5- 7- 3P NRCS .T1 -?. 3E T•rtis plan %Ydl be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait unid wastes reach surface waters or lease your property to consider that you have a problem. You should rrrake e :'e. r effort to ensure that this does not happen. Tlus plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should tak,-. i. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed be6v. A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are: a. Add soil to bean to increase elevation of dam. b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate. c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately. d. Call a pumping contractor. e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon. B: runoff from waste application field -actions include; a. Immediately stop waste application. b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste. c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff. d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff. e. Evaluate the application rags for the fields %here runoff occurred. C: Leakage from the wash pipes and sprink]ers-action include: a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrigation pump. c. C.lose salves to eliminate further discharge. d. Repair all leaks F'ior to restarting pumps. D: Leakage from flush s,,'stcros. houses. solid separators -action include: a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrication pump. c. Make sure no siphon occurs. d. Stop all flow.; in the house. flush systems, oi- solid sep :.trators. e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. E: l_eaka!2e from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks- possible action: a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon. b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and compact with a clay n'pe soil. c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as possible. ?. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages. a. Did the waste reach any surface waters? b. ;Approximately how mach was released and Cor what duration? c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage? d. Did the spill leave the property? e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters? f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters' g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)? h. How much reached surface waters? 3: Contact appropriate agencies. a. Durins normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-735-390. Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation. b. if spill (eaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - c. Instruct ENIS to contact local Health Department. d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SNI/CD office phone number and local \RCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - 4: If none of the aba.ve works call 911 or the SheriSheriffs Department and.e xplain your_ problem to them and ask: that person to contact the proper agencies for you. 5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage, n b c Contractors \ame: Contractors .-address: Contractors Phone: C:':: rnber 4 6 Contaci the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Eneineer. etc.) a. Name: b. phone: 7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to recut. the damage. repair the system. and reassess the wastz management plan to keep problems with release of wastes from happening again. Dec-nine:IS. i 96 Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations Source C"IrSL' IINIVS to Control 1w;CCtS Site Sticcific IY'LCIiccs Liquid Systems Flush l tl[ttc% - ACCt[[11IlIal1011 of Solids ❑ Flush system is designed and opcmicd sufficiently to remove accmnulnted solids from gutters as designed. I] Remove bridging of accumulated solids at discharge Lagoons and fits Cnlsied Solids ❑ Maintain lagoons, scttling basins and pits where pest hrceding is apparent to iniiaimize the crusting ofsolids to a deptll of no more than b - b inclics over more than 3M°a of surface. liaccssivc VL:Lctstivc DCL:uying vegetation ❑ Maintain vegetative control along hanks of tirowth lagoons and other impoundnlents to prevent accunit lation of decaying vegetative nincr along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter. —� Dry Systems Fcc,€etN — _ Fcell Stlill;lge — n Uesigll, operalc ;lull nl711111ain IccLt SyStrinS (c �;.. hunkers and troughs) to minilnizC the accullmlattorl of decaying %Vaslage. t I C€can tip spillage: oil a routine basis {e.g., 7 - 10 clay in[crval (luring slmmler, 15-30 day interval during wilder). I'l:c1l S[LIras!c - ACCII111ISIaliMIS of feed resid:leS n €tcrlucc moisture 'iccuniukitioa within and ;Ironnrl immediate perimeter of feed s[or;rgc areas by insuring dr;linat;c away I'runl silo ;[Il[UGT providing once€[IatC col![;tin111CM (e.b-, covered ilia for hrcwcr's grain ;uid simll;rr hil�ll nimsture brain pro(hicts). n hlSlicc[ hlr and ri:[11nVe or hic;lh Iltz ;LMIllI[II;11CI1 Solids ill hltcl. Strips ;11.(7llrl,l €CCII S1411;I1;C :15 11L'ed L'd, AN11C' - NuVClllher 11, 1096, Page I Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Source Cause 11MPs to A1ini1lliec 0114)1- Silt: Spt:ciTc Pracliccs l arnlslead Swine produc(ioll 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers; O Recommended best management practices; C7 Good judgment and common sense Awnwl body SrlrNM Dirty nianure-covered animals ❑ Dry floors Flour surfaces We[ rllantlrc-coverer] floors C1 Slotted floors; ❑ Waterers located over slotted floors; 0 Feeders a[ lrigh end of solid floors; ❑ Scrape man[1re buildup from floors, C] Umlerlloor ventilation for shying f�-f.ulurc cu[Icclioll pits th-hic; ❑ Frcctucnt manure removal by 1luslt, l)it recharge, • Pal'[1:1I 1111crobl"d decomposition or scrape; n Underfloor ventilation Vc11filJIt1111 cxlljuU[ fails • vokI do uses; ❑ F11! ll)altltcllfl[14C; D11st C] 1:111c:tent air111ovellIctil ]ndmir Snrfilccs f)IISI ❑ Washdown bct%vel:tl groups of arltlllals; f1 feed addiliveS; n feeder covers; D Feed delivery downspont cx[cndcis to feeder covers 1:I1tsh t.,ul.s Agitation of recycled lagoon L] Flrlsb [auk cnvt:rs; liquid w11i1e tans s arc filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottorn of tanks with arlll-siphon vents 1.111,h ;llleys • Agllatiotl during %v;lslelvmt:r ❑ underfloor f1tish %vldl underfloor velltdalion conveyance Pil Icch;uLc points Agitation of rccyciccl lagoon f7 Emend recharge: lines (11 near IIu1l-im t)(pils liquid while Pits are filling tvl[b :sllli-siphon vents 1-11i SI;IIi011�1 Agllalilln tltlring Slltlll) tall{; L-1 Sump t:Lrlk ct)vcrs filliag-and driwtlown ntllsiJL: drain cnllccli,, Agllalitsn dltrilll; WILSICWw I[cr Cl 111)x Covers ur julicllon buxcs CntivCy;lllcC A NI(W - Nuvclilkcr 11, 1996, P;q c J SOLIM: Cause IIMPS to Minirnice Odor Site Specific Practices End of drainpipes at • Agitation daring wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level Lagoull surfaces Volatile gas emissions; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity; • Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures; • Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area-to-vohmic ratio; ❑ Minimum agitation when.pumpiag; ❑ Mechanical aeration, Fl Proven biological additives Irrigation spriltklcr • — l ligh pressllle agll;lliol4; F1 lrrib:itc on dry clays with litt[c or no wind; noccics \?find drill ❑ Minirntim reconinmided operating pressure; PumP intake; near lagoon lirluicl surface; Cl Pump from second -stage lagoon Storage tank or basin Partial wicrobial ticcomposhion; surface; - Mixing while filling; Agitation when emptying Scltling basin sorl Joe Partial Illi,:robial decomposition • Mixing while filling; Agitation when eniptying A-lanure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading; Spreader outlets 0 Volatile gas emissions Uncovered manill-C, Vol;ililc Uas emissions while; slurry or sludge un field cllying Sllrtitie5 Dead auirlurls Carcass decomposition ❑ Bottom or midlcvcl load;rlg; 0 'bank covers; ❑ Basin surface mats of solids; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants ❑ Extend drainpipe outlets undcrucath litluid Ievcl; ❑ Remove settled solids regularly ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges; ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants ❑ Soil injectionl ol'slurry/slltdre:s C-1 Soil incorporatCnn %vilbin 4S lirs.; ❑ Sprcad in thin uniform layers for rapid drying; ❑ Proven biological addilives or oxickillis ❑ Proper disposition ofctsrcasscs lead alSiltlA disposal Carcass decomposittoo ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits; pill ❑ Proper location/cnnslruction of tlisPosal Ails lnciocr;It uri Inernnl>Icac CtllntIiISIitll! Ci Second,lry slack burners AMOt.', - Nuvcnsbcr 11, 1996. Pat,;c =1 Source C:luse DMPs to Miuind-ze Odor SiJc Specific Practices Standing water arOUud Improper drainage; ❑ Grade and landscape such Iliac water drains facilities Microbial decomposition of away from facilities organise Inaltcr Manure tracked onto Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Fann access read maintenance public roads front farm access Additional Information : Swinc M-omirc Management ; mna Rulc/DNIP Packet Swine Production FanU POIenISal Odor Sources and Rcniudtes ; FBAE fact Sheet Swine Production Facility Manure Ml magcrnent: Pit Rccljargi: - l.ngnon Treatment ; I-DAC 128-89 Swine Prodt:ctiun facility Manorc Manugement: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon "treatment ; EBA1; 129-88 Lagoon Design and Munage:rent for Livestock Nfanure -treatment and Storage ; IMAE 103-83 Calihratiun of N9ar(urc and Wastrw-atcr Application Lni3itmtcltt ; [313A[= beet Shcut Cowrolling Odors from Swinc 13oildings , I'l I1-33 1lrtvirontncnt'al Assurance Proarans ; N1'11C Nhnual Optiurts for Nlanaging Odor ; a rcport from the Swint: Odor Task, Force Nuisance Cnnctmis in Anilnul Montre Ntanagcnaelst: Odors an(d !Tics PRO 107. 1995 Conference Proceedings AN1()C: - Nt7VCILtbQI' 11, 1996, PaI;u 5 Av,sikthIr Frnni : NCStJ, C(sunIy I:XICIISInn Center NCStj - BA1; NCSIJ - IIAI.' NCS[J - IIA1- NCSI1 - IfAI: NCSIJ - HAI: 1`JCSIJ - Swine Hxtensiuit NC P(trl: 1'mLhiccrs Assoc NCSIJ Agri CnnnlllnlCalions Florida Coodterativc 1a[ensi(sn Nfortality Management Methods (check- which rnethod(s) are being implemented) `1 Burial three feet beneath the surface of the Uround within 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing stream or public body of water. V G Rende;inp at a render in, plant Iicensed under G.S. 106.16S.7 Comt)lete incineration In the case of dead poultry only, piacing in a disposal pit of a size and desran approved by the Department of Agriculture J Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without enclange;ing human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached) r � 5 l . FORM IRR-2 L Tract # Field Size (acres) = (A) Farm Owner Owner's Address Owners Phone # Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record i One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle ,3 ya- Field # 3 14 RUNE I-Ofuc- R7- 1 13'Y' /0 ?-0 -'�- Lv�i"fi��N�ostS EXHIBIT E-2 Facility Number Irrigation Operator /4 Ur7_ n;d4'r Irrigation Operator's 'Y-r > 13r,- x Address vnir '_ 1)7of - 1,T' Operator's Phone # •_ . yS� - r'-. 7 From Waste Utilization Plan Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading ti f�SCUF - G,q)q-=-_/� I (lb/ac(e) = (B) (1 r7l 171 M rat r51 161 r71 ral r91 1101 ftil Date mmlddlyr Irrigation Waste Analysis PAN ' {lbllfSOa gal) PAN Applied (lblacre) a s 1000 Nitrogen Balance = (lb/acre) M - {t0) Start Time End Time Total Minutes (3) - (2) # of Sprinklers Operaling Flow Rate (gallmin) Total Volume (gallons) (e) M (5) • (4) Volume per Acre (gal/acre) .E_ (A) ,s- 5- �Y %:/am b : P.n (c r/. ! 3�r /9, . �,.•<- a,:xt, :.. s '' /..� ��. �'' /�J� , ram. I I I a Crop.Cycle Totals f Operators Signature Owner's Signature � �,.��I � ,' j` ,��'_- _ �, , g Certified Operator (Print) /�rl lG'i !, /;- ;J1.;' Operator's Certification No. t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633. 2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (13). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event. • EXHIBIT E-2 FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle I Tract # / Z) Field # y Field Size (acres) = (A) Farm Owner A 'I(/.UG Owner's Address Owners Phone # Facility Number - /II - Irrigation Operator /;/'7// <,7 Irrigation Operator's Address Operator's Phone #, From Waste Utilization Plan Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading Co/a5TR1_ - l�: (Iblacre) = (B) �-}',% ill 19% r31 (4) f51 (61 f71 (8) (91 NO) (11) Dale mrnlddtyr Irrigation Waste Analysis PAN ' (lb11000 gal) PAN Applied (Iblacre) fB]_1 0)- 1000 Nitrogen Balance' (fblacre) (B) - (10) Ti Start me End Time Total Minutes (3) - (z) p of 5prinSclers Operating Flow Rate (galrmin) Total Volume (gallons) (6) (5) " (4) Volume per Acre (gallacre) _LL (A) S- - 78 ZY111 6-:Mi2I :3�v >< 3— "c:r7 0 0 .a :. a- '� a - 3 98 a/v 99s�o �sb��.. i. _ �5 �s 8�i.6s ��'�8 Jo Pr, /J.' P ySJ 1 �/O �r/ fe- �'J ice; : Crop Cycle Totals I Owner's Signature !,. f �'' : !yl�,� Operators Signature Certified Operator (Print) .;: , ;:•; Operator's Certification No. 95- nc;. _ , , - _ /o 1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633. 'Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event. hj�FORM (RR-2 - t r Tract # I Field Size (acres) = (A) Farm Owner Owners Address Owner's Phone # Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle Field # i EXHIBIT E-2 Facility Number I J.3 I - I /G, Irrigation Operator /%'t Irrigation Operator's Address Operator's Phone # -ri •:; From Waste Utilization Plan Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading C-,.g3T4-1- - 1-1'U `/ (lb/acre) = (8) y 111 (9) 131 141 r51 (61 171 r81 191 1101 (11) Date mmlddlyr irrigation Waste Analysis PAN (Itr1100p gal} PAN Applied (Iblacre) fe1 Y i000 Nitrogen Balance' (tblacre) Start Time End Time Total Minutes (3) - (2) # of Sprinklers Operating Flow Rate {9a><min} Total Volume (gallons) (6) . (5) . (4) Volume per Acre (gallacre) M (A) Rll -9 �i+) .lAM �0,0 1 -�2/0 1,7�.CaO ll.R� /o.'/ff'il T,4 75 1 -Z/ Y/.75'D i141 . P�h 7 fd -�✓� /E-1 rpG�� �t N�' - , g6 / . L' J r 3 .J _ Crop Cycle Totals Owner's Signature X. - Operator's Signature Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No. I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633. 2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event. I I FOAM IRR-2 ' A, tf Tract # Field Size (acres) = (A) Farm Owner Owner's Address Owner's Phone # Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle / c Field # (� EXHIBIT E-2 Facility Number Irrigation Operator Irrigation Operator's Address Operators Phone # From Waste Utilization Plan Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading (. 04 3 T /}L. - %:'11 (lblacre) = (B) 7 O M 191 rs) 141 r5l r6l 171 1u7 IM lint fill Date mMddlyr Irrigation Waste Analysis PAN ' (Ib11000 gal) PAN Applied (lblacre) (0) , (9) 7000 Nitrogen Ba3ance' (lblacre) (B) - (16) Start Tuna End Time Total Minutes (3) (2) # of Sprinklers Operating Flow Rate Igallmin} Total Volume (gallons) (g) x (5) x (4) Volume per Acre (gallacre) (7) (A) - -1y L Al L :15& '%�3 1 �-/ /SS' �Ja6� . jr " 1. ./l-, A Pot I -D! 0 /0.' 15 Pi r 9 S 3r ^ 1 J b J - H 3-jD-,A 1/. P/'I �� U / ]., J 9y. Spa 15.yr: Crop Cycle Totals I I Owner's Signature r.:` , r_ a1" , , _... Operator's Signature Certified Operator (Print) i.�;fy y'i;j' j „_' Operator's Certification No. t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633. ' "1 ` 'Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B)• Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event. . i FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle Tract # Field Size (acres) = (A) Farm Owner Owners Address Owners Phone # /3S Field # /SSA Facility Number 15 j /S/ Irrigation Operator Irrigation Operators Address Operator's Phone # From Waste Utilization: Plan Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading C CW n! (lblacre) = (B) sf4 r11 121 131 141 f51 (6) (71 (Al 1i71 ring M1) Date mmlddlyr Irrigation Waste Analysis PAN' pb110o0 gal) PAN Applied (Iblacre) �gi - 19) 1000 Nitrogen Balance : (Iblacre) Start Time End Time Total Minutes (3} (2) # of Sprinklers Operating Flow Rate (gallmin) Total Volume (gallons) (6) _ (5) • (4) Volume per Acre (gaUacre) (7) (A) 6 �� �fA%�pl �-O o� 9S �'1l�CP, •%}'il �—�-/��" �rl � Pir1 �-�� i5'-O l� vvv /�cr.v � yy 2— : ', "✓ l�=l. G— 7- I 'fn -95/ 1 /4- 1 /t 7- - ff 9.A") 36. u Sri �- I • �- S )' ?w- u /,ff �3 i 1 ' 0 35 .,2SJ e23•f�c Crop,Cycle Totals I ♦ = '` C— Owners Signature.l.�s ; r.; , . r.° Operator's Signature Certified Operator (Print);, r> t Operator's Certification No. I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633. 'Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event. I N ME C K L E 14 8 U RG i ^ c 0 u N T r B RUN SW I C K mz 1.11211 0 Creek 1141 Im 1jgL4_ IN -0 L mg C).kih. v 2-3 Lift LV 124s S Lin 4 wi- 1 La LID 17 11-11 r in-3 1311 Lm 1 13 O—h Hill 121a ek, 1246 a im 30 '77' 1314 1.7 ry .6 It UR 4'j; -d 17153 W.— rii- Im Jill 2 li, LIU Lilt .5 LLLI- LLIL LLLL 3 RiautFr NOItUNA Yr. FAY !S -LIUII c For 901 1 —C- "06 $33J LL, I 1.1 - Ij" 1173 un rAr a±Lia )lot "Isem C, WoIA,.— 147 4.39 WARRENTON x 4ig2 IA f Poe. poll 12 L-9 i 1344 p dal ? 38 q LL I Ll At I I 9 L.b,o z AM Uj 9L v. 11.7 p rf P"-7 1Eaa Cl LIP L g, 1.6 cc, LL 9. 7A 21 —id- 7s.. Afl— Hill 41 *2 LOQ 56 .$o, a 10, 1515 -d 10, h 141, Idl) 'An 7.1 62?7 P .5 1 O it.-.,vj"1 l �� •ram -� �� ��� rf�J/'" � `�1 ��.'.�'�`�� ,�:` ����rr�;�r% 0 / �n '3 � � 1, /• �f r,,'`~.1 `�h. zao 1MjJJ� $j7R O LJJ � / f•;J . �`;�� ��"V�� .;y (l leis - _-4� ��- -- \� �%`11 -�-v'? � .'��.✓ J ~-� J09 r� /� 47 ��� •'F� •Jerusalem :J ` �`,�: • ` �? '�� a \\ a Y� �"� s _ ��_ _ � _ L` :�1 f i \,� - `I `f � �: i ! � k_r`'i--� 333 309) CO - ram•-� .1 �` V I � \ I � '�-1 � ` � � i � ' ./';�r�'1•''•,o a �:� � � � � � '• ~ 1 � "�f-``1�-11i//� _,•`♦�.�1. North /j 42 I t uet Grope 350F �`� rill ! '' -� f LL '�J+ //`'` / ✓ 1345 1 is r wnF7 ra ✓-nf TC]N1 awl s[as m, 1D' 754 225000O F EFT(N, C.) • ••, F. ,R-cm••, F'7 S� 1"m F. r United States }� Department of Natural Resources Agriculture Conservation Service WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION GENERAL INFORMATION 1 r ' NAME I'!1.� ;' % % . _ ft _ ' %'' LOCATION TELEPHONE �� 5� � J�� - `12 2 / SIZE OPERATION a v 54)Ld LOCATION DATA DISTANCE FROM NEAREST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER FT. DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACILITY (school, church, etc.) / FT. IS SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN? YES NO Ifyes, NRCS cannot provide assistance. IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM A "BLUE LINE" PERENNIAL STREAM? YES �r NO If no, site must be relocated. IS SITE WITHIN 1 MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES NO If yes, landowner should consult with Iocal zoning board about required permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval. ARE UTILITIES IN CONSTRUCTION AREA? YES ^ NO If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy. (Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attached to site NC-CPA-17 REV. 1, 2-96 WETLANDS WILL SITE INVOLVE CL.EARIING WOODLAND OR ANY NON-CROPLAND7 YES _ NO If yes, producer must complete Form NRCS-CPA-38 (Request for Certified Wetland Determination/Delineation). WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES NO IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF PERMITS ARE REQUIRED. IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY LAND UNTIL A WETLAND DELINEATION IS MADE. NRCS will provide technical assistance in wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland inclusions less than one acre in size, NRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values Iost are fully mitigated. For natural wetlands greater than one acre in size, NRCS will provide assistance only after a rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimization of impacts, and compensatory mitigation is carried out in that order of preference. ODOR CONTROL HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WTTII PRODUCER: • PREDOMINANT WAND DIRECTION7 YES �J NO • PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST I/2 YES NO _ OF THE CAPACITY? • USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN LAND APPLICATION YES /� NO OF WASTE? NC-CPA-17 REV. 1, 2-96 Page 2 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL. FACTORS IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT? YES NO IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AREA OR WILL PLANNED ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA? YES NO IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL. SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED AREA? . YES NO Ir ARE THERE PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT FARMLANDS IN THE YES _ NO OPERATING UNIT? WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES _ NO If the answer to any of the above is yes, NRCS will not provide technical assistance unless agency policy is followed WASTE MANAGEMENT - DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND APPLY ALL WASTE YES ' NO INCLUDING SLUDGE, ALTHOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED INFREQUENTLY? IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES NO IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEMENT ON LAND YES NO _ ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? (Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation.) SOIL INVESTIGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES NO _ / IS A LINER REQUIRED? YES NO TYPE OF LINER TO BE USED: CLAY ,-"BENTOMTE _ SYNTHETIC IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON YES NO SITE? IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE YES NO ACCESS TO CLAY? IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED? YES NO (Attach soil investigation sheet to site evaluation.) IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TILE PRESENT? YES NO (If yes, tile must be removed or plugged) SITE APPROVED YES NO CONDITIONAL COMMENTS -ICA _) caw — — THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID FOR TWELVE MONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRUCTION HAS NOT BEEN STARTED WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS, A NEW SITE INVESTIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED. U SIGNATURE DATE I/ Changes in the local or state law or changes in the standard could require a new site investigation. NC-ENG U.S DEPART OF -,AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION, SERVICE LOCATION CODE - PLAN OF WASTE STORAGE FACILITY NAME Gl „7&�(g ACP DATE DISTRICT LENGTH [� 1 S1 DE SLOPE. TD 1 o a AYE. TOP ELEY. ti 1�1 N ppp 1�0 D SECTIOrr N 1 ' AVE. BOTTOM ELEV. I _- LENGTH Volume in depth [(area of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 x area mi.dsection:) - cu. ft. 6_ Use of facility Capacity f / L . �i gallons Volume Cost --sharing cu. ft. Soil type B. M. description Elev. ELEVATION SU 4ARY ;. .�.. Normal liquid level Storage (normal precip) + Maximum liquid level Storage + Crest ESW Stage + Freeboard + Top of Dam ,ji �i 61 —111l'd op6i/ 7.� 6T W rF loI iTi all ', fJ,> � �/\I � mo-1, 7o- ......... I CIT \0 L 67c 7o, M TL FO ro RNji C) 6 M. T -T, —,. 1117 71 mod. LL "i r—Ec 1 5- fF,7 all OT Turk Itt 0 -377[ rRI jyj e:l 4yi TE e. YNnal A qI a 4 TITT 14 4 W, MT Ian wry f(r].qd F-17 TM tTr. Tor, e TM 0-41-1 le. Dl"l T Ilct CEO ritT75c, tltl Cl ;-1 —21 I 1 till MET- sot" -0 om I nil Tan yl!wg Y—D 1 40 ran tart Tw A Ni D I A 9 A i m n 0 a n Q I 'A I W A 1 I b �� r I f� r i5:�7 �•,nl �Ap { :,. ti. - � �� I+ i �'�- � �l 4":irri�' - i � � r i-:� x� .. / it r^•�'`.,'• -1 '-01'a ••G f '' r,1r r lr.. r 401 trl'l �. y% SS•• `ryy .14 ll,fr Pt ti'i4 �}- ��r �[{ �#*-�A3 J��`A. t ��.'..', df `� 1• �� �r���J�'�, �br�1i. �Tyh�, �+-;�j�, �t 4 -Frt r f i :: �% IiIs 1 • i `bL tr,;. y''` ,'G fir'• ,4t!�'4:�r✓ t-P �;� 1�rr ! M i{b�►J, 'k � %1•.r •` A�,r.rf;: r'�•i,. ,,r ' r. '7 ,rr, R, r r "��y„ T 5: S s� d r� ti •" • r � -yJ" u ai / i r C �', S �a � r r y^'+' +a- �' 7 -i r -s '� .3 t. 1 t ( i r �'rtrr � �^ 3r "n l i �_ +y fS lY� (t rYr' y t r ;. L r r ^i F f tiS f i` 5S. {�?s� 5 �� 3 ✓, �� ry "1 ' i i ;�!r _ '�[±.'•'' brt , lip � �} ""^y+�,�s� r . t �> J ,r .� r 1Yt'•r� 5 �b�} ' e,• '+y r �t(M.i'�4ri r, S!*ie• .ham• -i:•1�1" o r ^ w•"_ rY5 i y�- i.�A' t� rR'K } :f.. . ,(.,• :; I: ?; e j r `� raj d4 ell,ti'rr�l i� ` ;-j,}1.� [ l:iil t�. ;•.{�� �7- ��+,.�'�:y�� �:5'��'rr ': !'`lr�,](��f''��.•!l;:`'Jai'.k,;f`,t .f.✓i�'�a ,1 r�Ci."�`"'� .� +� y�y^ y� a r ��ts '. et' ;��' �, •� �� - - 1 �ti�� i.. h s i l tr..3+#a/,t S r..�rh .� ;K psi ,i- t `. ! ,f,f j� tii'� 'y/. ,. ,t� /j,� - ���Y �fI�:1' 1 �-i:•, 4 r `,� 1 l�.�L�.ai ,.��' ���'b f ���4 �.: •'� ��r- -+_.� ._,.,-�,�,'�,�'ia �;�F-j� .may '�' S;, Vr ��` r� ^ � ��{ : / �� " _ �z c;+;i <,+. t,'i"'• f r� 5 �}`imYt{Y+V,��q y.L •sa.yf{ '� ' n t ` ,�'lr 1, fig 1 5 � � a• 1 s 1 + 'S cr•, �i� �r " 7 3 ,�i. ��• � � :. 3 :�� i/'�yir ' �' n !n -%`��R•r; r`�fisa-+4-, a 1,,:.�y�{Sq i l�.V� s�[y1 � � CL ��„� -7�i7 3��,�{ �},U �_�� ', ��`� /i ��.'�' rfi.. , �•�,� /�� �� -;1'�r i,�,.r,'." ,,.r-:' lif /`G :�7 c rr �1 ;4T7� r�{,t• r'S 'rry��C,+T ' '{�1�� �] Y�•`i+. fj < ;t' �•[ ,1 R }' y� L� /sr +yt�> '} .,s �tr� t,;r �� �^ ]7�,�F r: 'i .�Sr a u,..1� J 1 s - - s ,. P 5 e t� Y� L l i i�, � �•," r' t �, rj -�, ..,..y !ti>.:y} - z...r•r / ;�' v; t r- �'! , r '�i j] i. $ s -R c.. rt f r . Irl,,: kJ rf �`.f y rJ {pG� ✓`! 1 ?r, ��. y i f/! �., �� iti}µ y1�I% Irk` 1 r� ! lt✓ �r�ff°�dr���JJ�v���y �� n �h "��//il 1r �, ,•tz �I .lf .� 'i•„ + �G �,�t,y �J�- �! i . j',r�e.P%'s�'.•r-,!Sr �b _J.. •:.�#1 -;i • �•,+ • , t '1�,' 1 `` ,i s:K•/�'f.R'��Cjr�7 �.� J� ^� .u� I r� �'° s s.AvfyT� f •t.y�• ' iJ '5' .. f► fi' '.r'rY,� , ''11Y=1 tt1 �'i! T'451�!•• -.� ,' .' n;.J,4. �_�. �1?GP�'F'L^..'". Er�i` aT `•: lot p �l fir: �s. .� `., � � fie: � ��`•l � • �+• ? �s��,.! r �rrt�� ��rf � ��J�r' ay r • \ 'e f �{fe.t �!-�,T,/ s� i •' a`@i Zr a3'e�`:- . �ik �tr \ J �y Jr y }'��'ri. �•` rr� c="' `'v... , rr,.' l�.•!/x frr.,� r� 1 I r'�Y'( �,'.�,'i _ -Y �, a� r,_„Y I � ..tr j s''�r ¢� ,� _,�yr •.�4*.-rl '�+- .d� e. •, r.v � , { t��9� X.'dff �'.,�.�j,;��.k i''� �r- �.I �� � «^ �- - __ . , ... �'E, , 5 • a tk•, ``nf n» � t.;=°+fir 1 � :4 rif ,$�;� �`}y�'�,+; ;� F '� jv IFF av w �l 1t rim? / �'�_ r .4. ` r .r. ......JJ ` ` r .ice t�,•r{Ly,+ >2�y/{r�+� 8 Poi t;, • ? r - •1 -` r, �+. # lll"'sss a r '��:r� r�' � i t' r br r -y� r� _. P to1Z The purpose of this.plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the routine operation and maintenance work seeded to keep this swine waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is considered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence. A. Maintenance The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following: I. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side slopes .��:..1� ,_� / r�xr, r is being established on these areas. Beginning in I!Dgqand each year thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized with 800 pounds'of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand- 2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment.. This may be done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three. This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation. Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the initial filling of the lagoon and at least monthly. Items to be checked should include, as a minimum, the followin R F rte-�y s rnC)N 1. Waste Inlet -Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and ovNM Pipes a. separation of joints b. cracks or breaks C. accumulation of salts or miner _ i s. Non.Disevorge Petm�t�+ng d. overall condition of pipes 2. Lagoon surface a. undesirable vegetative growth b. floating or lodged debris 3. Embankment a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes b. side slope stability - slumps Cr bula_es C. wet or damn areas on the back _icue d, erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action e. rodent damage 1 ►mil APR 23 '98 10 29AM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX P.3i4 4. Transfer Pump - recycling and irrigation pumps a. overall pump operation b. leaks C. loose fittings s. surface water diversion a. adequate vegetation b. diversion capacity C. ridge berm height B, Oneration Your -animal waste management facility was designed for a. .total of sows/animals (_ to _ ). The lagoon co1'ntains both permanent and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to he pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The design storage includes permanent storagq of one cubic foot per pound of steady state live weight. The temporary storage portion cf the lagoon includes capacity for the volume of waste produced over 180 days, the amount of rainfall in a 25 year 24 hcur storm event plus an additional "heavy rain" factor, and rainfall in excess or evaporation. Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage; therefore, it will need to be pumped every six months. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches elevation as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level reaches elevation _ _ Pumping can be sz.arted or stopped at any time between mesa two elevations for cperatiog convenience as site conditions permit, such as weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without runoff cr leaching. The attached waste management plan must be followed. This plan recommends sampling and testing ci waste (see Attachment B) before land application.. The was=a material should be analyzed before each application cvcle to determine its nutrient content. t soil test of the area c_ application.should be made annually zo insure the waste is applied as reasonably and practically possible zo recommended rates. Waste treatment lagoons must be prastirgeX :with z vclume of water s ual to one --half of the treann nr vc_ume before. 'pastas are introduced. Precnarg i nc_ _ wduces t!:e ccncentration of the initial waste e _arinc the lagoon ;,terabv reducing odors. Solids shcul: to cos,erad with effluent at all times. 2 --.., - NC-ENG OF AGRICULTURE SOILI .CONSERVATION SERVICE LOCATION CODE PLAN OF WASTE STORAGE FACILITY NAME �T� GIIZ - 14-� �a ACP �� `. ^DATE DISTRICT. LENGTH Si OE SLOPE. i0 1 / ko , AvE. FOP ELEV. t3 0 \ /�, 0 AVE. BOTTOu ELEV. I-- -- tE6GTH -- I y� (I Volume in depth Carea of top) + (area of bottom) + {4 x area midsection] = c u . f t . _ 6__ - Use of facility _ Capacity f 116, yj-y _ Qalions Volume Cost -sharing cu. ft. Soil type B. M. description L'LEVATION SUO ARY Bottom Normal liquid level Storage (normal precip) + Maximum liquid level Storage + Crest ESW Stage + Freeboard + Elev. Top of Dam 3. 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding' all required buffers and areas not covered by t ie`,apglication�, system): 60.00 Required Acreage (as listed in the.A WMP): 14 2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): I 2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? or 9((please circle one) 2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES orplease circle one) 2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only) S or NO (!ES) (please circle one) What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?%D What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each item. Applicants Initials 3A One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal Waste Operations; 3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and Field locations where animal waste is land applied; 3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components: 3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility. 3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.) 3.3.3 A snap of every field used for land application. 3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field. 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field. 3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP. 3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. 3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP. -3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications. 3.3.10 A site schematic. 3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan, 3.112 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted. 3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility, 3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan. If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal. FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 93 - 14 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN- P HONE NUN LBERS EtiIERGE`'CY NIANAGE: XT STEM -.266I, SWCD S7 - b.P,jC N-RCS( T'rus- plan wi11 be imple:riented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking. overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or lelve your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make eve,-: effort to ensure iliac this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the facility. ,The following are some action items you should take. 1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below. A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are: a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam. b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate. c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately. d. Call a pumping contractor. e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon. B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include: a. Immediately stop waste application. b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste. c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff. d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff. e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred. C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include: a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrigation pump. c. Close va'Jves to eliminate further discharge. d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. D: Leakage from flush systems. houses, solid separators -action include: a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrigation pump. c. Nljk-c sure no siphon occurs. d. Stop all t1ow., in the house. flush syterns, or solid ae= arators. t,., , ,,r-,., I c s OCA e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks- possible action: a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon. b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fiil holes and compact with a clay type soil. c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as possible. 2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages. a. Did the waste reach any surface waters? b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration? c. Any damage Noted, such as employee injury, fish lolls, or property damage? d. Did the spill leave the property? e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters? f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters? a. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)? h. How much reached surface waters? I Contact appropriate agencies. a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 9I9-t'3-394?. Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the. facility, the location or direction of rr.oyement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective' measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation. b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - c. Instruct Eti1S to contact local Health Department. d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - 4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff s Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you. 5: Contact the contractor of Four choice to begin repair of problem to nvnimize off -site damage. a. Contractors Name: ,2- A - b. Contractors Address- Sgaz& H..ELL L), c. Contractors Phone:' �IqI - 2.3 S t T I Dc'. 'nits?e r [". I C 96 6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer. etc.) a. Name: �trfs b. Phone:�Leo 7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with release of wastes from happening again. Decl-mhe - 1',. 1996 Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations Source Cause UM1's to Coutrul lusects - — - Site SpCeifte Practices - --- Liquid Systems Flush Cutters Accumulation of solids E6 Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to remove accumulated solids Front gutters as designed. Remove bridging of accumulated solids at discharge 1-aguons and fits Crustal Solids M Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where: pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 5 - 8 inches over more than 30% of surface. Excessive vegetallvc Decaying vegctaliom lI Maintain vegetative control along hanks of tir�uth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent accutnttlation of decaying vegetative matter along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter. / Dry Systems _ l cc�Ecr> _ l"ccd Spillage: - Resign, ulcerate and maintain feed systems bunkers and Irocrghs) to minimize situ accumulaliun of decaying wastage. Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 dtty interval during summer; 1 5-30 day interval during +vintcr). Fced 5toraLe Accumulations of feed reSidnCS Iv"1 Reduce moisture accunmlation within and around immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by insuring drainage away from site anWor providing; adequate containment covered bin far brewer's grain and similar high moisture: grain prorhicls). Inspect for and remove or hreak tip accumulated solids in filter strips around Deal slor.rt;e M needed. M AMIC - November 11. 1996, Page I l�anuslcari Anirrlal body surfaccs flour surfaccs Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Cause • Swine production IIMI's to Minimize nrlor Vegetative or wooded buffers; Recommended best management practices; Good judgment and comnion sense • Dirty manure -covered animals W f Dry floors • Wet manure -covered floors Milmir4 collection pill UriILC; • Partial microbial decomposition Vclltdati+In cXhausl f;ula VOIaIIIC gases; Dust hrcluur surfaccs E)nst Flush t.a11.s Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid while tanks are filling Hirsh alleys Agitation dtlriag wastewaier conveyance Pil ttclr.Ir t'e puillis Agitation of rccyclud lagoon liquid while pits are filling Lift statium , Agllalion during sump tank - filling and drawdown ntttaitIc clfit itl coIlection • Agitation during wastewater ur}unctiun huxes conveyance Slowed floors; Waterers located over slotted floors; Feeders at high end of solid floors; Scrape manure buildup front floors-, Underfloor ventilation for drying Frcllucut manure removal by flush, pit rcchargc, or scrape; Underfloor ventilation Fau maintenance; Efficient air movement f17l Wasbdown between groups of animals; f7 Deed additives; I:ccdcr covers; Feed delivery downspollt extenders to feeder covers ❑ [Mush lank covers; Cl Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with anti -siphon vents It Underfloor Hush II EXICIIII reclwrge lilies 10 nc;rr IkltllrIII of Nils with anti -siphon vents T Sump tank covers ti Box citvers Site sliccific I'ruclices ANIOC - Nuvcauher 11. 1996, Page 3 Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices End of drainpipes ill 0 Agitation during wastewater ❑ . Extend discharge point of pipes underneath lagoon conveyance / lagoon liquid level l_agoun stirfaces 0 Volatile gas emissions; Gi Proper lagoon liquid capacity; • Biological mixing; Correct lagoon startup procedures; • Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio; ❑ Minimum agitation when.pumping; ❑ Mechanical aeration; 9Proven biological additives Irrigation sprinkler 0 1 filth pressure agitation; FjJJ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; nozLles 0 Wind drift L�1 Minimum recommended; operating pressure 6/. Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; ❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon Storage tank or basin 9 Partial microbial decomposition; El Bottom or midlevel loading; surface a Mixing while tilling; ❑ 'Tank covers; Agitation when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Scitling basin snrfacc a Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid • Mixing while filling; level; • Agitation when emptying ❑ Remove settled solids regularly Manure, slurry or shtrlge . Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injection Of shtrry/sludges; spreader Outlets . Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use; 0 Proven biological additives Or oxidants Ifricovcred manure, a Volatile gas emissions while ❑ Soil injection ul'slurry/sludges dare- Y Of sludvc un IWILI � drying ❑ Soil incorporation within 48 lies.; sill 't: ccs ❑ Spread in thus uniform I7iyers for rapid drying; 7 Provcn biological additives or OXid;nus [lead animals heal[ ❑ninr,1l disposal bits • Carcass decomposition Carcass decomposition Proper disposition ofcarcasses Complete covering of carcasses ill burial pits; Proper local ioniconsIrtrctiOn Ol'disposal pits 1116MCra10r5 • Incnnrptete conibusuou Cl Secondary stack burners Atv10C - Ptuvcmher 11. 1996. Pagc 4 Source Cause RMPs to Minimize Odor Standing \Viper around 0Improper drainage; IA Grade and landscape such Iltat water drains facilities 0 Microbial decomposition of ,away from facilities organic matter Manure tracked onto Poorly maintained access roads fn Fann access road maintenance Public roads from farm access Additional Information : Shiite K-lanure Maiiagemcm ; 0200 Knle/l3MP Packet Swinc Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAC Fact Sheet S%vinr Production Facility Manure Ki-magetnent: Pit Recilarbe - Lagoun Treatment; FDAE 128-88 Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 129-88 Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE [act Slice( Cuntrulling Odors from Swine llnildings ; 11111-33 l:nvironnicnial Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force Nuisance. Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PR0107, 1995 Conference Proceedings ANIOC - N,,vL:lnbcr 11, 1996, Page 5 �ilr ini•ri fir Prnrlirre Available From : NCSIJ, Cunrtty L•'xlcnsinn CcntLr NCSIJ - BAH NCSIJ - BA NCSIJ - IJA1: NCSI I - BAE NCSIJ - BAI: NCSIJ - Swine Extension NC Pork Producers Assoc NCSIJ Agri Communications Florida Cooperative lixicnsion A-lortality hlanaclement A-lethods (check: which method(s) are being implemented) Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing stream or public body of water. V C) Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7 Complete incineration ❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the Department of Agriculture Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached) I S. I99t) ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Producer: Location: Telephone: Type Operation: Number of Animals: (Design Capacity) STORAGE STRUCTURE: APPLICATION METHOD: Arthur Holt King RVCr- I NJ S 0 tON WAiERQQW Rt . 1 Box 110C FEB 1 a 1999 Warrenton NC 27589-9502 ePe�m'tttin9 Nan-Dischar� (252)456-4377 Existing Farrow to Feeder Swine 500.00 sows Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon Irrigation The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner: 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations. Page: 1 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. ' 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, f t3, tons, etc.) 500 sows x 7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 3650 tons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 500 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 3250 lbs. PAN/year Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. Page: 2 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1.: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LES COMM N ** * LBS ' DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------ APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME 1342 3 32B FHG 4.5 168.75 0 7.0 1620 I MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 14 132D iIBH 14.0 1200 10 13.0 1800 APRIL- OCT 1342 5 IBH 0 132B I 14.0 1200 14.0 11200 APRIL- OCT 1342 7 IBH 0 13211 I 14.0 1200 12.0 1600 APRIL- OCT 1342 8 FHH 0 13211 I 14.5 1225 12.0 1540 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 9 FHG 8.0 13211 I 14.5 1168.7510 11800 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1339 1 IBH 0 132B T 14.0 1200 112.0 13000 APRIL- OCT 1339 2 FHG 8.0 13211 I 14.5 1168.7510 11800 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 12 3 6B Q IC I 195.0 1-19:8.7 We 12.0 MAR-JULY 1353 12 36B 0 JW I 145.0 1108 12.0 1216 AUG- NOV,MAR-MA 1353 112 136B ISOY 135.0 1175 10 12.0 1350 Page: 3 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AUG 1353 I 11 JUNE,AUG -N 1353 11- 1353 11 AUG 1353 11 NOV,MAR-JU 6 36B 36B II IHH 14.5 1225 C 95.0 1-76 I SOY I 135.0 1175 W 149.0 108 I IAPRIL- 0 13.0 1720 MAR- 0 13.0 1228 MAR-JULY 0 13.0 1525 APRIL- 0 13.0 1324 AUG- END II / e• O TOTAL Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and x may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 4 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 2: ACRES WITH -NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END TOTAL10 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS PER UNIT C CORN BU .80 FHG FESCUE HAY - GRAZED TONS 37.5 FHH FESCUE HAY - HAY TONS 50 IBH IMPROVED BERMUDAGRASS - HAY 50 SOY SOYBEANS BU 5 W WHEAT BU 2.4 TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 Page: 5 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1 TABLE 2 ACRES 64 0 LBS AW N USED 13xJfr0 -5~ / 3 b''?Joo TOTAL 64 -13 9 6t /3 Yeti * * * BALANCE *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables. See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste. SLUDGE APPLICATION: The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 550 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the sludge. If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2750 pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 9.16666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22 acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25o depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application methods. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and Page: 7 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. Tract Field Soil Type Crop Application Rate (in/hr) Applic. Amount (inches) 1339 1 32B IBH .40 *.75 1339 2 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 3 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 4 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 5 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 7 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 8 32B FHH .40 *.75 1342 9 32B FHG .40 *.75 1353 11 36B SOY .40 *.75 1353 11 36B C 0.40 *0.75 1353 11 36B FHH 0.40 *0.75 1353 11 36B W 0.40 *0.75 1353 12 36B SOY .40 *.75 1353 12 36B C 0.40 *0.75 1353 12 36B W 0.40 *0.75 * This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. Page: 8 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. NARRATIVE OF OPERATION Page: 9 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip) S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. Page: 10 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. Page: 11 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. Page: 12 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT Name of Farm:Arthur King Swine Farm Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: Arthur Holt King (please print) Signature: -v Date. - /10-1- Name of Manager(If different from owner) : Signature: Date: Name of Person Preparing Plan: (please print)Bruce Perkinson Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257- 3836 Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main Sr. Warrenton NC 27589 Signature: LC.el_ Date: C;� - 1 & - cf Page: 13 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ANIMAL_WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT (Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.) I, , hereby give permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below. The field(s) on which.waste can be applied are shown on the attached map. I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer. Adjacent Landowner: Waste Producer: Technical Representative: SWCD Representative: Term of Agreement: Date: Date: Date: Date: 19— to (Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items) (See Required Specification No. 2.) Page: 14 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF • I, a Notary Public of said County, do hereby certify that , personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 19 My commission expires (SEAL) Notary Public. Page: 15 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 0 Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement I, hereby agree to apply waste generated by in a manner that meets the Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the Division of Water Quality. Third Party Receiver: Term of Agreement: (Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF Date: to I , , a Notary Public of said County, do hereby certify that , personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of My commission expires (SEAL) �j Notary Public. Page: 16 ym' frl 'j t to; —,,gT OT il I 1141 6f, TM TFU ify. I Ti, I MR Trrl r,-r. 9111 61 WIT T 10 v TM lip's ri -M TOT c Wri FM ri LQ* TM TUT r6n ri O14a4 WIT WIT vc ails j TM TM on rm TM i7A., TH T go. p % i TM NOIN143bayM Uri 797 "n K 1 0 irm Tm SYff 0 i -MT =q t FO M, TrF, rrr" Im 73 -'r e3li r"In ETI,#Cw i� M7 -6m i4 ood 767L rm HOD" 'FM TM fm YPNUON M TmIn rn r 7rrl Avg c wn C TIM INIPW w om Ir . ..... cl Fm< < un ym im Fe 4k TTIT Trrr V L-04 4m- 0 Uff TM Tw . TWI ILI 7m rc -fw irm 'dM Ru b6fT WIT F, ET .,,- q -0-8 -an WT Ah S N n d I A I m A 0 D y ou n c N a i )i Diw oe WATER QUAL liY SZC7 MIN, V NOV 2 9 1993 AN?uAT, WASTE 1xiAGNT PLAIT C-RTzirICATZOH FOR E.125TIN cili'r..4, .,,..,., Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Hamagement at the address on the reverse aide of this form. Name of farm (Please tint) : �fj lIOM _/'I._ _/C.1j j_. Mailing Address: -11 Phone No.: / (� Count (of farm) Farm location: Latitude and Longitudei{.. ld U /,�%'M' (required) . Also, please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified. Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, tc_):.SL-"; Design capacity (number of animals): Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): u7 Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): Technical Specialist Certification As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the existing animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A IlCAnC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule -for timing of applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the �25-year, 24-hour storm. Nana of Technical specialist (Please Print) :_ll1CL�rC�e�I� Affiliation (Agency): Lt> ch Address • 33�- S. d Phone No/'4SA%^ Signature: Date Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any.expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment ,.acid storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there - must be no discharge o£,animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm- The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. Name of Land cwaor (P ease Print)\ Signature: Date:,[ Name of Mamager, if different from owner (Please print) Signature: - - _ -- ---- _ Date: Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer. �7 OEM USE ONLY: ACES€ 11-14 6rare of Norm Carolina ` Department of Environment, ` Health and Natural Resources 4 Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary EH A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director • ' CERTTFICA,TJON F R EXI TIN FEEDL T INSTRUCTIONS FOR'CERTIFICATION OF APPROVED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR EXISTING ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SERVING FEEDLOTS • 8 a -;a 20tip U-61 In order to be deemed permitted by the Division of Environmental Management (DEM), the owner of any existing animal, waste management system constructed and operational before January 1, 1994 which is designed to serve greater than or - equal to the animal populations listed below is required to submit a signed certification .form to DEM }before_ 7An1%nr_1, 1998. Pasture operations are exempt from the requirement to be certified. 100 head of cattle 75 horses 250 swine 1,600 sheep 30,000 birds with a liquid waste system The certification must be signed by the owner of the feedlot (and manager if different from the owner) and by any technical specialist designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC•.6F ',0001- .0005. The technical specialist must verify that all applicable operation and maintenance standards and specifications can be met. Existing systems are -not required to meet design and construction standards and specifications. Although the actual number of animals on the facility may'vary from time to time, the design capacity of the waste handling system should be used to determine if a farm' is subject to the, certification requirement. For example, if the waste system for a feedlot is designed to handle 300'hogs but the. average population will be 200 hogs, then the. waste management system requires a certification. This certification is required by regulations governing animal waste management systems adopted by the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on December 10, 1992 (Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217). On the reverse side of this page is the certification form which must be submitted to DEM before January 1, 1998. Assistance in completing the form can be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation District, the USDA -Soil Conservation Service, o=;the N.C. Cooperative Extension. Service- The completed form should be -sent to':' Department of Environment, Health and Natural, Resources Division of Environmental Management Water Quality Section, Planning Branch P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 Phone: 919-733-5083 _ -- Steve W. Tedder, Chief water Quality Section Form ID: ACEXIST0194' Date:, �k�:�a 1923 P.O. Box 29535. Raleigh. North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Atfumative Acfion Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer pcper 01, �`�^ � /I E T r r J -zi- fp r\1. i� p t 'I }�_ r r'• 'v �' Al J t`\rclo - i � - .� �- � 4�.� •+_ � �,� /- �� —�� c � � -..l is// ti jam` .. 14 Ol lip t\ S � L r0� N I�12INrY} ,�'�� � a .�r I1 { i1'�( ........ H2`� �"•_-�! ,4, JJ •,, 1 " OJ r� r.�' ,r .� rrrr'' ,r• ; , d� I .Z •��-.i' ttil - SY+ at r� ;Yi i r iT;i ® +ti till St FtTi [. r i II!k � °'"O1J y r &M a 'J 111•n.7 ./ , rM dtil Y TTii v PC - c; FM,iTii nr L II.W ftr4-3 MI w� Tr, l vt S r wol�sy 1i ."qa T y4 ry TMi � r W ,• C'M dill MR � r /r ;L aril r\wv:A [IMI t l S t t .� FM { J} a e lot TTTT . M Tw 1, Sig i[ $' [.[ id3T K ' 3.� '�1 i"Y•if TrZ TM . �7y' TM a > >s wn Tan S, r117 L% 0.1 5 Isr, m NO. NaNgYM � .. C'1 ,I fa Tf —, Tdf #•y t Fitt a1Ti 4 �. 4� 1 Y TM ua y7oM . 47 „ �, �• � 'rj 3 �e ItTI SM �y r iSi71 nr r 'fWl rT r O [[l im I .oy6nd it �� r l I �y 4 T 41 Pj Im [3it 4 lOr y7 C$I,jod- ; 'i df t K ZTM I ~ 1�� 16. aoa BMS rt if i i e TRl a �i C Axr �1 T[i•T ri 'Lr r vHtlllOk tu..epQ C * d aT ::: { a1 t r •1 ar {y ttl r ~a { 7 .��, TiTT ►7tt riei 4 t r Ki->::,iy`y^. �w c a� Tm C � i r� � 35rf iRT f y, 4 aL 1 'k, rii[ y i 4 Tdii } t r rifl RL'i i �f Cl iTTt y y [� R +[L1 zm c � u idCT , 1 > Sd 4iTnT i C!TTM 4y 1 ❑ o s. TTU I ;m 1 4 rT[L T K L41 4Pyb i � 6 CI r 1L I, ll idTi r �'M y IMT 6' f 1 3r'' 7f 'FM rt ti y ii ! Mk'"Io0 0 -dii r ,.V WT - -LiTIT � � � ^4fPl �J � . _ • ` , 4 Idn ,fm TTTT �+ vm r rJ -Im v tsar rsF ,�� , ► �Oss f t' 3 r. )1� tMS Hfld 9 A 1 N n O1 ;t Deng R317t J3W o t 3. 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding' all required buffers and areas not covered by the.applicatton 4 ' system): 60.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the,AWMP): 14 2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): i 2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? or 9((please circle one) 2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES orplease circle one) 2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only) ES or NO (please circle one) What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each item. 3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal Waste Operations, 3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and field locations where animal waste is land applied; 3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components: 3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility. 3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.) 3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application. 3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field. 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field. 3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP. 3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. 3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP. / �3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications. 3.3.10 A site schematic. 3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan, 3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.14 Mot7ality Control Checklist with the selected method noted. 3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility. 3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan. If your CA WMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal. Applicants Initials FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 93 - 14 Producer: Location: Telephone: Type Operation: Number of Animals: (Design Capacity) STORAGE STRUCTURE: APPLICATION METHOD: ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN RECEIVED A I ,-K t3UA!_1 13 y)ru R luwv Arthur Holt King Non -Discharge Permitting Rt. 1 Box 110C Warrenton NC 27589-9502 (252)456-4377 Existing Farrow to Feeder Swine 500.00 sows Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon irrigation The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner: 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations. Page: 1 ' V ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 500 sows x 7.3 tons waste/saws/year = 3650 tons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 500 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 3250 lbs. PAN/year Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. Page: 2 % 41 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS. COMM N ** * LBS • DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED - --- or -------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME 1.342 3 32B FHG 3.5 131.25 0 7.0 1620 I MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 f4 IIBH I 132B f 14.0 1200 10 13.0 1800APRIL- OCT 1342 5 IBH 0 132B I 14.0 1200 14.0 11200 APRIL- OCT 1342 7 IBH 0 132B I 14.0 1200 12.0 1600 APRIL- OCT 1342 8 FHG �32B I 14.5 1168.7510 12.0 1337.5 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 9 FHG 0 132B I 13.8 1142.5 18.0 11140 MAR- JUNE-AUG-N 1339 1 IBH 0 11211 I 14.0 1200 112.0 12400 APRIL- OCT 1339 2 FHG 0 132B li 13.8 1142.5 18.0 11800 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 12 36B 0 IC I 195.0 176 12.0 1152 MAR- JULY, 1353 12 36B 0 JW I 145.0 1108 12.0 1216 AUG- NOV,MAR-MA 1353 112 136B ISOY 135.0 1175 10 12.0 1350 Page: 3 , L f . ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IAPRIL- AUG •1353 11 36B FHH 0 I 14.5 1225 13.0 1720 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 11 36B C __j95.0 76 0 3.0 I 1 122B MAR- JULY, 1.353 11 36B SOY 0 I 135.0 1175 13.0 1525 APRIL- AUG 1353 11 36B 0 JW I 145.0 1108 13.0 1324 AUG- NOV,MAR-JU END I TOTAL112412.5 - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 4 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) • (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END TOTAL10 Indicates that this -field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS PER UNIT C CORN BU .80 FHG FESCUE HAY - GRAZED TONS 37.5 FHH FESCUE HAY - HAY TONS 50 IBH IMPROVED BERMUDAGRASS - HAY 50 SOY SOYBEANS BU 5 W WHEAT BU 2.4 TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 Page: 5 i ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ACRES TABLE 1 64 TABLE 2 0 TOTAL 64 LBS AW N USED 12412.5 0 12412.5 *** BALANCE 1-9162.5 1 ------------------- *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd -areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables. See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste. SLUDGE APPLICATION: The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 550 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the sludge. If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2750 pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 9.16666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22 acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25°s depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application methods. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and Page: 7 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application • rates and amounts. Tract 1339 1339 1342 Field Soil Type Crop Application Rate (in/hr) Applic. Amount (inches) 1 32B IBH .40 *.75 2 32B FHG .40 *.75 3 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 4 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 1342 5 32B IBH .40 *.75 7 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 1342 1353 1353 1353 1353 1353 1353 1353 8 32B FHG 0.40 *0.75 9 32B FHG 0.40 *0.75 11 36B SOY .40 *.75 11 36B C 0.40 *0.75 11 36B FHH 0.40 *0.75 11 363 W 0.40 *0.75 12 36B SOY .40 *.75 12 36B C 0.40 *0.75 12 36B W 0.40 *0.75 * This assuming applied. be applied application conditions. is the maximum application the amount of In many situations, because of amount shown amount nitrogen allowed the the nitrogen can be applied allowed for for the crop application amount limitation. The under optimum the soil is not over shown cannot maximum soil _" Page: 8 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Your facility is designed for 1.80.00 days of temporary storage and the • temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 mdaths. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot • of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. NARRATIVE OF OPERATION .Page: 9 NARRATIVE OF OPERATIONS Producer decision may be to plant corn 1 year followed by wheat in the fall then he may plant soybeans the second year or he may plant soybeans followed by wheat the first year followed by corn the second year. This planting pattern is subject to change each and every year in. fields 11 & 12. Reference item # 2 of letter dated 2/19/99. Corn/wheat and soybeans will never be grown simultaneously (grown together in the same field at the same time during the same year) Reference item #3 of letter dated 2/19/99. Waste can be applied to any growing crop during the year as long as the soil is not saturated or frozen. Fescue will grow some every month of the year in Warren County. Reference item #5 in letter dated 2/19/99. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy 'of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip) 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. Page: 10 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17..A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. Page: 11 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. Page: 12 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT Name of Farm:Arthur King Swine Farm Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the -farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: Arthur Holt King (Please print) Signature: Date: Name of Manager(If different from owner) : Signature: Date: Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257- 3836 Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St. Warrenton NC 27589 Signature: Date: la Page: 13 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT • (Needed only if additional land has to be .leased, etc.) z, , hereby give permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below. The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the attached map. I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer. Adjacent Landowner: Waste Producer: Technical Representative: SWCD Representative: Term of Agreement.: 119 to (Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items) (See Required Specification No. 2.) Date: Date: Date: Date: Page: 14 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA • COUNTY OF 1, Public of said County, do hereby certify that , a Notary , personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 19 My commission expires (SEAL) Notary Public. Page: 15 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Waste Utilization -_Third Party Receiver Agreement I, hereby agree to apply waste generated by in a manner that meets the Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the Division of Water Quality. Third Party Receiver: Term of Agreement: (Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF Date: to I, , a Notary Public of said County, do hereby certify that personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of , 19 My commission expires (SEAL) Notary Public. Page: 16 NC-ENG U.S . DEPARTKENT OF AGRICbLTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE LOCATION CODE PLAN OF WASTE STORAGE FACILITY NAME`RL7T //Z_ ���6 ACP # DATE DISTRICT LENGTH Z1.5 ej 51DE SLOPE. TO 1 / AYE. TOP ELEV. Q4 ' al / o On '4`O —MID SECTION � / 1 AVE. BOTTOM ELEV. tr �_ ._ .... LEZrGiH ...�� yam Volume in d_ ipth area of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 x area midsection,) cu. ft. 6 ELEVATION SUMMARY Use of facility Capacity V gallons Bottom _ Volume Cost -sharing ��� cu. ft. Normal ^liquid level Storage (normal precip) + Soil type B. M. description, Elev. Maximum liquid level Storage + Crest ESW Stage + Freeboard + Top of Dam ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WATER QUALITY SECTION tAN 15 1999 Producer: Arthur Holt King Non -Discharge Permitting Location: Rt. 1 Box 110C Warrenton NC 27589-9502 Telephone: (252)456-4377 Type Operation: Existing Farrow to Feeder Swine Number of Animals: 500.00 sows (Design Capacity) STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner: 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations. Page: 1 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. G. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 500 sows x 7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 3650 tons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 500 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 3250 lbs. PAN/year Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. Page: 2 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE l: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or -------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME 1.342 3 32B FHG 3.8 142.5 0 7.0 997.5 I MAR- vliLu�tU one] 1342 IBH 14 132B 14.0 1200 10 13.0 1600APR- OCT 1342 32B IBH 0 1-1 I 14.0 1200 14.0 1800 APRIL- OCT 1342 7 32B IBH 0 I 14.0 1200 12.0 1400 APRIL- OCT 1342 32B FHG 142.5 Q 111 I 13.8 12.0 1285 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 9 32B FHG 0 8.0 I 13.8 1142.5 11140 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1339 1 32B IBH 0 I 14.0 1200 112.0 12400 APRIL- OCT 1339 2 32B FHG 8.0 I �3.8 1142.5-10 11140 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 12 32B 0 IC I 195.0 176 12.0 1152 MAR-JULY 1353 12 32B 0 JW I 145 1108 12.0 1216 AUG- NOV,MAR-MA 1353 11 32B IC 195.0 176 D 13.0 1228 I MAR-JULY Page: 3 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 1353 I I 11 32B l145 I108 10 13. 0 1-324— I AUG- .NOV,MAR-MA 1353 11 32B FHH �4.5 1225 1 3.0 1675 I MAR- JUNE,AUG-N END I TOTAL19357.5 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 4 ANIMAL WASTE IITILIZATION PLAN TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or -------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END TOTALI0 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseedin.g. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS PER UNIT C CORN BU .80 FHG FESCUE HAY - GRAZED TONS 37.5 FHH FESCUE HAY - HAY TONS 50 IBH IMPROVED 13ERMUDAGRASS - HAY 50 W WHEAT 2.40 TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 ACRES I LBS AW N USED Page: 5 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TOTAL 59 0 f 59 9357.5 0 9357.5 *** BALANCE I-6107.5 1 ------------------- *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal. waste N produced. Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS . DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME 1342 3 32B FHG 3.8 142.5 0 7.0 997.5 I MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 IIBH 14 132B ll 14.0 I200 10 13.0 1600 APRIL- OCT 1342 32B IBH d 1-1 I 14.0 1200 14.0 11200 APRIL- OCT 1342 7 32B IBH 200 0 I 14.0 12.0 1400 APRIL- OCT 1342 8 32B FHG 0 2.0 I 13.8 1142.5 1285 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1342 9 32B FHG d I 13.8 1142.5 18.0 11140 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1339 1 32B IBH 0 I 14.0 1200 112.0 12400 APRIL- OCT 1339 2 32B FHG 0 8.0 I 13.8 1142.5 11140 MAR- JUNE,AUG-N 1353 12 32B SOY I 135.0 1175 12.0 1350 APRIL- AUG 1353 11 32B SOY I 135.0 1175 1 13.0 1525 APRIL- AUG 1353 Ill 132B lw 145 1108 10 13.0 1324 Page: 3 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN I I II I I I I IUAG- NOV,MAR -MA .1353 11 32B FHH �4.5 1225 0 3.0 1675 I MAR- JUNE,AUG -N 1353 12 32B I W 145 1108 0 P-0 1216 I AUG- NO V,MAR-MA TOTALI10252.5 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 4 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END TOTAL10 Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS PER UNIT FHG FESCUE HAY - GRAZED TONS 37.5 FHH FESCUE HAY - HAY TONS 50 IBH IMPROVED BERMUDAGRASS -- HAY 50 SOY SOYBEANS BU 5 W WHEAT 2.40 TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 ACRES i LBS AW N USED Page: 5 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TOTAL 59 0 59 *** BALANCE 10252.5 0 10252.5 -7002.5 1 ------------------- *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables. See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of. animal waste. SLUDGE APPLICATION: The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 550 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the sludge. If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 2750 pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 9.16666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22 acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 250-. depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application methods. APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and Page: 7 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. Tract Field Soil Type Crop Application Rate (in/hr) Applic. Amount (inches) 1339 1 3213 IBH .40 *.75 1339 2 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 3 32B FHG 0.40 *0'.75 1342 4 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 5 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 7 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 8 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 9 32B FHG .40 *.75 1.353 11 32B C .40 *.75 1353 11 32B FHH .40 *.75 1353 11 32B W .40 *.75 1353 12 32B C .40 *.75 1353 12 32B W .40 *.75 * This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. Page: 8 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after'you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. NARRATIVE OF OPERATION Page: 9 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip) 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. Page: 10 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. Page: 11 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or + terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. Page: 12 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT Name of Farm:Arthur King Swine Farm Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm -named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facility Owner: Arthur Holt King (Please print) Signature: Date: Name of Manager(If different from owner): Signature: Date: Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Bruce Perkinson Affiliation:Warren Soil and Water SWCD Phone No. 919-257- 3836 Address (Agency): 133 1/2 South Main St. Warrenton. NC 27589 n SignaturDate: Page: 13 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN • ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT y (Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.) I, , hereby give permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below. The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the attached map. I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer. Adjacent Landowner: Waste Producer: Technical Representative: SWCD Representative: Date: Date: Date: Date: Term of Agreement: 119_ to (Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items) (See Required Specification No. 2.) Page: 14 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF I, , a Notary Public of said County, do hereby certify that , personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of IQ7 My commission expires (SEAL) Notary Public. Page: 15 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement hereby agree to apply waste generated by in a manner that meets the Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the Division of Water Quality. Third Party Receiver: Term of Agreement: (Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF I, Public of said County, do hereby certify that Date: to , a Notary , personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 19 My commission expires (SEAL) Notary Public. .Page: 16 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. Tract Field Soil Type Crop Application Rate (in/hr) Applic. Amount (inches) 11339 1 32B IBH .40 *.75 1339 2 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 3 32B FHG 0.40 *0'.75 1342 4 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 5 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 7 32B IBH .40 *.75 1342 8 32B FHG .40 *.75 1342 9 32B FHG .40 *.75 1353 11 32B C .40 *.75 1353 11 32B FHH .40 *.75 1353 11 32B W .40 *.75 1353 12 32B C .40 *.75 1353 12 32B W .40 *.75 * This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. Page: 8 I f State of North Carolina Department of Environment, ;ter (:.,•7 Health and Natural Resources Raleigh Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretory Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager Arthur King Route 1, Box 118C Warrenton, N.C. 27589 Dear Mr. King: r4**A IDEHNR Division of Environmental Management August 11, 1995 Subject: Management Deficiency Notification King Swine Operation Secondary Road 1300 Warren County On July 27, 1995, Mr. Steve Mitchell, from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems. Mr. Mitchell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following management deficiencies were observed: -It was noted that a significant number of large trees are growing along the toe of the lagoon slope. Trees can compromise lagoons and cause them to seep wastewater. These trees should be removed and the lagoon berm stabilized. To continue to effectively manage the waste generated by this facility, this deficiency must be immediately addressed to help prevent the possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office requires a written response to the aforementioned issue within 30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address how ,you plan to correct this problem and submit a schedule (with dates) stating when this management deficiency will be corrected. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan. This Office would like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are required to have an approved animal waste mana ement plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District. 38W Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone 91"71-4700 FAX 91M71-4718 An Equal Opportunity Affirmvtive Action Employer W%recycled/ 10% post-conamwr paper The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. It you have any questions regarding your inspection please call Steve Mitchell at (919) 571-4700. Sincerely, Y"I Kenneth Schuster, P. E. Regional Supervisor Ism HAIetters.piglking cc: Warren County Health Department Bruce Perkinson - Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation Central Files RRO Files Site Requires Immediate Attention: Facility No. _93-14 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: July 27, 1995 Time: Farm Name / Owner: Arthur King Mailing Address: Route 1 Box 11 Warrenton, N . C . 27589 County: Warren Integrator: Phone: On Site Representative: Phone: Physical Address /Location: S . R . 1310 Type of Operation: Swine _XX_ Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: _1300 Number of Animals on• Site: DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM -Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude: 36' 32' 34" Longitude: 78° 09' 24" Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1- Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes Actual Freeboard: 1.7_Ft. Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? No Was any erosion observed? No Is adequate land available for spray? Yes Is the cover crop adequate? Yes Crop (s) being utilized: Coastal Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? Yes 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes 100 Feet from Wells? Yes Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made. ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? No If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes/No Additional Comments: Pine trees and pok erry all ver am. Inspector Steve Mitchell Signature cc* Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed. SM YISITA' QN OWs tL-kFH: 7I m County. L Agent Viaiti g Sites ( -" {7j:cretor, /� Z �.� . '�J(7 _ Page- ! 1% l On Site Phone: Miysiad Adams; ?duiding Add= Type of Cp=aoa: sAnne Z,_ Poultry � caille Dt sign Capacity: 0 S - c1 4 Numb-er of Anima cn Sht: —. .3:2. LviWtu do. -29-0 r.Z42 ... � TWe of Inspoctian: Gmund ✓ Aerial Cirets'RS of INC Does the Ajunml Waste Lagoon ham malicicat rmttaard of i Fcot +25y=24 hour storm e4 tit (appro d=tcly I Foot -i- 7 Iza1w) 4y c$ r No Aclual rjcc�moasd; -I- T--f,..t BVI�65 17ar i'acilh.'es with more t", ^n c :a �nrn1, Z if %- address the dt: N. ct1!]umatS section. NVns any set:p=� observed fmm the laanon(s)? Yes OK 'a lva� Ic... crezian of ttm J=?: Yes o �Q is adcquam lend a,;Aable Cbrland spOkm ion? Ycs r-Mb Is the cz;vcrcrop „dagaatY%S>,)r ZqO Adc}itonalCommem. ::�Le d r:��..�.. c: c' a !r 2.1 to (919) 735-3539 Sig=ium or Alton /d,- is F- State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Arthur H. King Arthur H. King Rt 1 Box 1 10-X Warrenton NC 27589 Dear Arthur H. King: 1 � • NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES December 30, 1999 Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping Animal Waste Management System Facility Number.93=f_4_-' Watt en :County; This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers. Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2,'DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2, SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an appropriate enforcement action. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting requirement. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the DWQ staff at (919) 733-5083 ext. 571. M', cc: Raleigh Regional Office Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File Sincerel , Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary November 13, 1996 Arthur H. King Arthur H. King Rt 1 Box 110-X Warrenton NC 27589 SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation Facility: Arthur H. King Facility ID#: 93-14 Warren County Dear Mr. King: 1 • � ®E�HNFR Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly, requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine by January 1, .1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty. If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office. Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026. Sincerely, e � A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E , 'Director Division of Water Quality Enclosure cc: Raleigh Regional Office Water Quality Files P.O. Box 27687,X A11107114 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 M� An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmotive Action Employer Voice 919-715-4100 50°%o recycled/ 10°%o post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director June 8, 1999 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RFrOn REQUESTED Arthur H. King Rt 1 Box 110-X Warrenton NC 27589 if 0 NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Application No. AWS930014 Additional Information Request Arthur H. King Farm Animal Waste Operation Warren County Dear Arthur King: The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has received additional information following our earlier request. Further information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by July 8, 1999: 1. On Page 3 of your Waste Utilization Plan: Please verify if Tract 1342, Field # 3 is under Fescue Hay, Hay or Fescue Hay, Grazed (FHG), and adjust the realistic yield accordingly. 2. On Page 6 of your Waste Utilization Plan: Total acres and lbs of animal waste N shown in this table shows the entire cropping scheme given on Table 1. Part of this cropping scheme covers a two-year rotation (corn -wheat - soybeans). Please have the table revised to show the nitrogen balance on your farm on any given year. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before July 8, I999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit. Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at (919) 733-5083, extension 363. cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Permit File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Si rel JR Josh Soil Scien st Non -Disc arge Permitting Unit Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-0719 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director February 19, 1999 CERTIFIED MAIL RET RN RECEIPT REQUESTED Arthur King Arthur H. King Rt 1 Box 110-X Warrenton NC 27589 Dear Arthur King: C4 AA1 � • NCDENR. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Application No. 93-0014 Additional Information Request Arthur H. King, Warren County The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has received a response to our earlier request for further information. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address and submit the following information by March 21, 1999: You have submitted a lagoon sketch showing 1, 116, 454 gallons of total storage in one lagoon that appears to be low for a 500 Farrow to Feeder operation. Please consult your technical specialist to obtain an as -built calculation or construction checks he/she performed to certify this farm under .0200 rules. 2. The revised plan still has corn -wheat -soybeans given on one table. Since corn -wheat - soybeans cover two years, please have the Table 1 of your waste utilization plan split into two tables to show nitrogen balance in two separate cropping years. The nitrogen applied to wheat can be split in half for the individual years. The current plan shows a huge deficit that is not true if accounted for the fact that part of the plan covers two years. 3. Please clarify waste application to wheat (Aug -Nov, Mar -May?) and soybeans (April - Aug?). It is unclear from the table if wheat and soybeans are grown simultaneously in April and May. 4. The realistic yield expectations for FHG (Fescue Hay Grazed) appear to be higher than those recommended by NRCS. The NRCS recommendations currently are 4.5 tons/acres for hay and 3.8 tons/acre for graze. Please clarify these yields and provide any justification for any higher yields desired. 5. The application time for Fescue hay grazed has been change from Mar -Apr, Sep in your old plan to Mar -June, Aug -Nov in your new plan. Please explain the reasons for this change. Also provide justification for such application as late as June and as early as Aug for the Fescue crop. Please note that all revisions or amendments made to the waste utilization plan (WUP) or a portion thereof are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical Specialist before they are submitted for review. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Application No. 93-0014 Arthur King Page 2 Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before March 21, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit. Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at (919) 733-5083, extension 363. cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Permit File Sincerely, JR Joshi Soil Scientis Non -Discharge Permitting Unit rER 2 2 !999 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director February 11, 1999 Arthur King Arthur H. King Farm Rt 1 Box 110-X Warrenton NC 27589 Dear Arthur King: �/ 1 � • MOM NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: -Application No. 93-00 t4 Additional Information Request Arthur H. King Farm Warren County The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address and submit the following information by March 13, 1999: 1. Operation and Maintenance Plan for your lagoons is missing. 2. Please specify the number of lagoons present on your farm and submit calculations to show required storage volumes in each of these lagoons. 3. Options on the Senate Bill 1217 checklists (insect control, odor control, and mortality management methods) are not noted. Please check off the options that relate to your farm. 4. The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists soybeans, corn and wheat in a two-year rotation as available crops for waste application. Residual nitrogen left over from the soybean crop in the two-year rotation must be accounted for. Nitrogen application rates to the following corn crop are required to be reduced by 15-30 lb, (dependent on soil type) to account for the residual nitrogen left by the preceding soybean crop. Please revise your WUP to properly list all application rates with residual nitrogen incorporated into your cropping scheme. 5. Since corn -wheat -soybeans cover two years, please have the Table 1 of your waste utilization plan revised into two tables to show nitrogen balance in two separate cropping schemes. 6. The realistic yield expectations for FHG (Fescue Hay Grazed) appear to be higher than those recommended by NRCS. Please verify these yields and provide any justification for these higher yields. Please note that all revisions or amendments made to the waste utilization plan (WUP) or a portion thereof are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical Specialist before tlr!ey are submitted for review. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before March 13, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit. Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call meat (919) 733-5083, extension 363. Sincerely, I �FB 1 inn,, JR Joshi Soil Sc' ntist Non- ischarge Permitting Unit CC'. +.Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Permit File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper