920006_PERMIT FILE_20171231

14!18no lP4UUWUOJIAU3 j0 lUUu4jUdo(j

N

�Z N N H N ZZ ZHV

17

ZI T N N N E NEW.

5E i H N N Lc" Z6EW<:

.! fJ �-'/'�M
�'r�a�

P.
an", I

Ao a�ln
1vV) aco

{.ryti�MP lt!".
,ti
+ _� � �� � �
.L
�' �' �` ,.
�� _
�.� � . _
'.�� �
� /}y mil' ,1� ,��� _
bRv � .ry i._. 'r �. r = y —ram
r r
� :i
� � .�(J�
i� iYi��i� � �, ?A :1�
F `C i,�_
.e 4 t i/� �'r—'
.. CV' �.
� '..,;

"+ J _

• 1 1 /'-tr�� r
i . ,Ak

r
tt1
.'
a'.
ii♦ '1iyp�, i1-4
4
FFF
IO Ra-
4
�A6� �

---s
�43�

State of North Carolina
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice Reply to: Anita LeVeaux Quigless
AT70RNFY GENERAI. P. O. BOX 629 Environmental Division
RALEIGH [phone]
2 7602.0639
[phone] (Fax)
May 3, 1996
Edgar R. Bain
Bain & McRae
P.O. Box 99
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: C.W. Gelder, 96 EHR 0415
Dear Mr. Bain:
In a letter dated January 3, 1996, a civil penalty was assessed against your client C.W.
Gelder in the amount of $3,282.16. A finding of fact in that civil penalty assessment, that your
client owns a hog facility located on State Road 1391, 0.3 road miles south of the junction with
SR 1386 in Franklin County, North Carolina, was in error. In fact, your client's hog facility is
located in Wake County. Accordingly, it is my belief that my client will rescind that civil
penalty. It is further my understanding that another civil penalty will thereafter be issued naming
the correct county. Once you receive the order rescinding the civil penalty, I hope that you will
withdraw your petition.
Thank you for your consideration.
c: Honorable Beecher R. Gray
Harlan K. Britt
Steve Tedder
Kenneth Schuster
Danny Smith
Sincerely,
-t 04it
Anita LeVeaux Quigless U
Assistant Attorney Genera
Bar No. 13667
A. Preston Howard
Kathy Cooper
Danne Wilburn
Judy Garret
i
p� 81CG�
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

t _ - ,`Lei''ar.��� 1 ,.-[$ C. Ii��'sS
D'ension of Soil and Water,;Conservation °Operation Reniaw� E r t,1� 3 r I- � ,t]
WF eta ?p-t , S '�E.
DinstoQ of So&,An Water Conservation Compliance )Enspeciton!R s rr,b� etT;
k{ S E'�,.4,� i;,. .:.. r i;'.�{':. i. .. , S: { M.
w , " Dinseoaof Water. vale Com leance Ins ecilon
Q tY P A�
... F. ....� .' 1 ...x'•
a 'OOtherti'gency' Operation=Revrew�" „, , a�{ yllt� �� t� ,
0 Routine 0 Com laint O Follow-u of DW ins ection O Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of inspection 3 Z 6Q
-- - „-, Timc or Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted 13 Certified 3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ..............[.... ....P......... ........ ....'.`.............................................. County:...........W...................................
Owner Name:........ �pL...t.ie............. �a/kps �. Phone No:
................................... ..................
Facility Contact:......................................................
.
Mailing Address: ........ 6...........................................
Onsite Representative: „_
Title-
.................... Phone No:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: ................................................. ; . .................. I .......................................... Operator Certification Number:.......
Location of Farm:
t.. .... .::,._... --- ^.... .................................................. ..... ....... --'
Latitude © • ©' j of Longitude F-7R7, Fq 47-` ®"
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW
Number of.Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischars,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [(No
Discharge orioinatcd at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other ����
a. If discharge is observed. was the convevance man-made'? El Yes ©"No
b. Ili discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes +�No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in aaUrnin?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon systcrtt'? (If yC. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes gNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes 'WNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 5�No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes O/No
Structure l Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldendlicr:
Freeboard (inches): 122 .......I ............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Oe/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

3
3 3`f r L?
,titude a
Waste Last Added (mm/dd/yy)
?8 V� 41
Longitude El . F]' T'
5. Estimate of lagoon surface area (acres)
7. Height of Embankment (feet)
8. Distance to Blue Line Stream (feet)
9. Distance to down gradient well without intervening stream (feet)
10. Distance to WS waters or HQW (miles)
11. Located within 100 year floodplain (Y/N )
12. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
p Yes ado
a. Sludge Near Surface
C
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Cl
c. La_oon Liquid Clear
F.
13. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly Built, Trees, Stumps, Erosion Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, etc.
C
.nb. -Construction Specification Unkiiow-n But-Darri''Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
a
14. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
G
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design -
c. No Drainage Area or Diversion Well Maintained
❑
15. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
Cl
c. Meets Current MRCS Liner Requirements
❑
17. Management to Prevent Overflow
a. Liquid Level less than 12 inches from Top of Dike OR Liquid Level less
C
than 18 inches and No Sprayf eid or Application Equipment Available.
b. Liquid Level Greater than 18 inches from Top of Dike with No Application
C
Equipment and/or Spravfield Available OR Liquid Level Between 12 and .
18 inches with Application Equipment and Sprayfield Available.
c. Liquid Level Greater than 18 inches from Top of Dike.
G
nt an ` -
Application Equipmed Spray -fie -I'd
18, Was contact made with on -site representative: M�
W Yes ❑ No
19, Does lagoon require follow-up:
0 Yes

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 1, 2000
Mr. Sean Abernathie, P.E.
Squires Homes
3701 National Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Subject: Geldder Farm -Lagoon -Closure
Wake-C- nu ty
Dear Mr. Abernathie:
The Raleigh Regional Office has reviewed the closeout documentation for the G.W.
Gelder farm in Wake County. On March 24, 2000, Mr. Charles Alvarez, from the
Raleigh Regional Office visited the old Gelder Hog Farm with you to do a closure
inspection. The facility was a 150 hog farrow to finish operation located off Mann's
Loop Road in southern Wake County. The facility was operated by Lynwood Carroll
and the last hogs were removed from the site sometime in 1994.
Mr. Alvarez's site visit confirmed that no residual solids from the hog farm operation
were located in the bottom of the lagoon. One end of the lagoon structure had been
breached and runoff from a upstream pond was flowing through a low area of the lagoon
and onto an unnamed tributary to Middle Creek.
The Raleigh Regional Office concurs with your closure report that the lagoon structure
has been cleared of any animal waste and that the lagoon structure can be considered
closed. The sample reports provided by you in your letter and visual inspection by Mr.
Alvarez show that all waste material has been removed from the bottom and sides of the
lagoon.
If you have any questions regarding this inspection please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at
[phone].
Sincerely,
2
Ken ZScE.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Larry Petrovick, Wake County Soil and
Water Conservation District
RRO Files
1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALE10H, NORTH CAROLINA 227699-1628
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

a2r(
wh-tE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
March 1, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO : Dennis Ramsey, Supervisor, Non Discharge Branch
FROM Charles Alvarez, EIT, Env. Eng., Raleigh Regional Office
SUBJECT : Gelders Pond Lagoon Closure, Wake County
On February, 21, 2000, Mr. Sean Abernathie of the Squires Homes Company, brought in a
letter concerning a lagoon closure at Gelders Farm in Wake County. The farm had been a
hog facility that was closed out in the 1995 or 1996 time frame. Mr. Abernathie has been
in contact with me about what information was needed to consider the lagoon closed so
Squires Homes would not need to be concerned about any Iiabilities. associated with the
closed farm operation.
I told Mr. Abernathie that without a closure plan the best thing that was possible was to get
an engineering firm to sample the soil at the sight and see if any sludge was left in the lagoon
depression. Mr. Abernathie is a Professional Engineer registered in North Carolina and
therefore qualifies as a technical specialist for lagoon plans and I assume for lagoon closures.
Please provide me guidance as to what other requirements, if any, Mr. Abernathie needs to
provide to prove closure of the lagoon. I am attaching the letter and sample reports that were
sent in by Mr. Abernathie. Please note that there is not a site map or sampling location
included with this letter. If you would like me to go with Mr. Abernathie to do a farm
inspection, let me know and I will provide pictures of the location and my opinion of the
state of the lagoon area.
The company's intention is to leave the lagoon area as a green area for the subdivision.
If you have any questions, please call me at 919 571-4700.

• A Homes CmnEunv
QUIRES
February 18, 2000
Mr. Charles Alvarez
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
3800 Barrett Drive. Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Gelders Pond
Lagoon Closure
Dear',,fr. Alvarez:
Included for your revie,.v, is a copy of the soils report conducted by �Ir, Kent Messick
from the North Carolina Department of Agriculture. Agronomic Division. The report
was Generated from four soil samples taken at different locations in the bottom of the old
lagoon at an approximate depth of 6' from existing around. The method of collection
was as directed by Mr. Messick in a telephone conversation.
To date I have witnessed the draining of the old lagoon, personally conducted onsite
visual test holes in the adjacent fields and had the remaining lagoon soils tested for
residual chemical content. In my various site inspections I have not seen any evidence of
residual animal waste.
It is my intention to fill any areas of the lagoon not listed as wetlands by the ACOE with
topsoil from the adjacent proposed subdivision and utilize the area as open space. In
order to Finalize the DEHNR status of the lagoon I am requesting this site be taken off the
inactive list and listed as closed.
Please review the enclosed test and contact me with you department's decision at your
earliest convenience. If you require additional information or would like to conduct a site
visit please contact me at 418-9492. Thank you for your time and interest in this old site.
Since
Sean Abernathie, P.E.
Squires Homes
3701 National Drive / Suite 101 / Raleigh, North Carolina 27612
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]

KDA&CS Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creck Road Raleigh, NC 2764)7-6-i65 (919) 733-'2655 - —
�3
a� r -,1f6rbuomir UnderstandingtheSoil i � �_._.-_._. .. �
r t
__.
LAWNS, GARDENS AND ORNAMENTALS
(Crop Codes 020 - 031)
The amounts of lime and fertilizer shown under the heading ItecuntEltindalir►nsam flit most important
parts of the soil test report. Rates are given in units ol' Ihs/M, Which is the Santc as lbs/1000 112. If you
have a 3750-ftz lawn and are advised to apply 40 Ihs/M, then the amount of lime of fertilizer to add is 150
Ihs, or (3750 ft' / 1000 ftz) x 40 lbs.
The type orgrade of'fertilizer recotnntcnelcd depends on the soil test level of phosphorus and potassium.
A fertilizer recommendalion might Ire, for example, 20 lbs of 10-1O-10 per 1000 ft' or ati equivalent
fertilizer, such as Ill lbs ol'20-20-20. NO'1'L4, enclosed witli your report, shows how to calculate fertilizer
rates from different sources. When phosphorus (/'-/) and potassium (A'-/) indices are higher than 50,
nitrogen will be the only fertilizer recommended. A typical nilrogcn I-CC011unneltd16011 would he 1.011) N/
1000 W. Ammonium nitrate (33.5% N) applied at 3.0 Ills would provide 1.0 Ib of nitrogen. For
centipedegrass, the annual nitrogen rate is 0-5 Ib/IOOO ft'.
The optimum pH for mast turfgrasses, vegetables, shrubs, and annual and perennial flowers ranges
from 6.0 to 6.5. Acid -loving plants, such as azaleas and rhododendrons, do better it a pl-i between 5,0
and S.S. The optimum pH For centipedegrass is 5.5. Maintaining the proper pl I is just as important as
applying fertilizer. For additional information on lint and fertilizer application, see WE 4: bmirs,
Gunlens and Ormunerrfcrl s enclosed with your report.
soil1est Index
Crop Response t0 Nutrient Application
kur�e
Rafla{g
I7u,s/rbnrrrs
1'olrrrsluru
/aim:
C(I)per
0-III
Gvry Low
Very 1101
Vvr%. Iligli
Vcly I Ii,;h
VI-1-V Ilil;b
Vary Iligh
II-2s
Low
Iligh
Ilieli
Iligh
Iligh
Iligh
20-10
Medium
Metlitifir
Alethliin
None
None
None
51-100
Iligh
None
Lox'-Nouc
None
Nona:
None
100+
very nigh
Nine
None
None
None
None
* Response decreases as soil test index i icn%ises.
Abbreviations
MIN
mineral soil
M-0
Inineril-organic soil
0
orgaific soil
IIM%
percent humic matter
W/V
weight/volunic of soil
Clic
cation exchange capacity
BS%
percent of CLC occupied by bases
Ac
acidity (decrease~ as pI I increases)
P-1
phosphorus index
K-I
potassium iritlex
Ca
calcium
Mg
magnesium
Mn-1
manganese index
Mrt-AI
manganese availability index
-Ln-I
zinc index
7.n-AI
zinc availability index
C11-1
copper index
S-1
sulfur index
SS-1
soluble S.111 index
NO3-N
nitrale nilrogeii (ppm)
Nll4-N
muriuinium nitrogen (ppm)
Na
sodium
K,0
potash
11,05
phosphate
11
boron
i0_0110 conics of 111k puhlir docimi uil were m-hilc(l it a cost of $626.22 or $0.02 leer covy.

NCDA A Ironomic Division 4300 Reedy Creck !toad Raleigh, NC 276I17-01M [phone]
Ile Jorl No: L(0.100
Grower: Squires Ilonres
Col) w hl:
'
A(In: Semi lAhernalhie
3701 National Di- Suile 101
VIM
Sol l
Test
161eil h, NC 27012
Report
1'ur11r:
2/15/00 SERVING N.C. CITI'/,I?NS FOR OVER 50 FEARS IValic Count
Agronomist Comments:
1i -- 'i
I divided Ille sanli le yllll sllllllliftell inlo 4 S111)S:Inlj)lcs.
cs1 1'vS1111s art' fairly
('1111S1sicill. R(,Slllls :11'(. bv(lel• 111:111 1 especled will] Soil jilt Ilot excessively
111w, :1 Vel•y high
jAlusl4lortis 10'el mall a
inoderale potassimn level. 1i;lse(I oil the 7.Illc allll
cols wl- levels follllll, Mere
IS no I'1'I11e41ce of a wlisle coillm11111alioll 1)1•ollle111 wills any u1 the S:1111111cs.
111ccidcd III
go ahead and n1Ve km o
recommen(Ialions fur :ill smut les.
I. Kcal Messick
Field Information _Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample A'o. Last Crop
A10 Vr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime A' n05 &0 Mg Cu
7n
B
Ali See A'ote
1 No Crop
I sl Crul): Lawn
0 (Lo Ihs Nitrogen or EQUIV PET 1000 SO FT)
4
2n(1 (xo ):
'Pest Results
Soil Class HA1% IY/1' CEC BS%
Ae p11 P-1
K 1 Can Alg% Ali -I Mn-ill (2) Zn-1 Zrr-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 Nth-N Allh-N Alit
MIN 0-22 0.87 5.6 89.0
0.6 6.0 141
51 62m 24.0 231 300 300
354
42
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sumple AV Last Crop
Alo IT T/A
Crop or )'ear
Lime N h05 ht0 Alg 01
711
B
11111 See A'ole
2 No Crop
1st Crop: Lawn
it (1.0 li)s Nilrogen or Ia21fIV PI:R 1000 SQ1 F)
4
2n(1 Cru ):
'rest Results
Soil Class 11,41% 1V/V CEC BS%
Ac pit P-1
K-1 CiOn' Atq% Ain-1 Ati-Al (1) Ali -AI (2) Zu-1 Z11-AI
01-1
S-1
SS-1 A103-N IVlh-A' Na
MIN 0.18 0.91 5.2 88.0
0.6 5.8 125
56 59.0 25.0 208 254 254
293
45
0.1
Field Information
lied Linte
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Alo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime A` M05 KO Alg Of
Z11
8
Ali See Note
3 No Cr❑p
Is[ Crop: l.mul
0 (1.0 Ihs Nitrogen or EV lIV PER 1000 SQ FT)
4
2n(I Cru 1:
'test Results
Soil Class HAM 1V/V CEC BS%
AC pll P-1
K-1 Crr% Alg% Ali-1 Ali -AI (I) hln-ill (2) Zn-1 Zi-AI
Car-1
S-1
SS -I N04-A! A7114 A'rt
MIN 0.22 0.92 4.5 87.0
0.6 5.7 105
51 57.0 24.0 188 227 227
278
42
1).1

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 ReedyCreek Road Raleigh, NC
27607-6465
[phone] Grower: Si wires Homes Ite }ort Ao: susou l g
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample 11'0. Last Clop
4 No Crap
A10 Yr TIA
Crop or Year
ISI I -op: La«iE
2nd Crop:
lime
I1
N Mi KO Alg C11 Zn P A111 See Hole
(7.0 Ibs 15-0-14 or I-'QI[IV VIT 1000 SQ FT) =i
Test Results
Soil Class 1141% 1V/i, CEC BS%
MIN 0.I8 0.82 4.7 89.0
Ae p11 P-1 K-1
0.7 5.8 109 18
Ca% Alg%
YI,O 260)
Aln-1 A111-AI (1) A1u-AI (2) Z11-1 Zll-211 C11-1 S-1 SS-1 JVQ-N MA -A' Na
16q 200 NO 26o 44 0.1

s•
+ A Beazer Homes Company Z( A"
QUIRES
,
February 18, 2000
CP
Mr. Charles Alvarez `-:1
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
' r
Re: Gelders Pond
Lagoon Closure
Dear Mr. Alvarez:
Included for your review is a copy of the soils report conducted by Mr. Kent Messick
from the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Agronomic Division. The report
was generated from four soil samples taken at different locations in the bottom of the old
lagoon at an approximate depth of 6" from existing ground. The method of collection
was as directed by Mr. Messick in a telephone conversation.
To date I have witnessed the draining of the old lagoon, personally conducted onsite
visual test holes in the adjacent fields and had the remaining lagoon soils tested for
residual chemical content. In my various site inspections I have not seen any evidence of
residual animal waste. ,
It is my intention to fill any areas of the lagoon not listed as wetlands by the ACOE with
topsoil from the adjacent proposed subdivision and utilize the area as open space. In
order to finalize the DEHNR status of the lagoon I am requesting this site be taken off the
inactive list and listed as closed.
Please review the enclosed test and contact me with you department's decision at your
earliest convenience. If you require additional information or would like to conduct a site
visit please contact me at 418-9492. Thank you for your time and interest in this old site.
Since
3 ~4` N 1I
ean Abemathie, P.E. , `, .'•3c
Squires Homes,
3701 National Drive / Suite 101 / Raleigh; -North
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
a 27612

I NCDA&C5 Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 (9j_4)�7.33-?65S
Understanding the ,Soil �L�s�'lrt
LAWNS, GARDENS AND ORNAMENTALS
(Crop Codes 020 - 031)
The amounts of lime and fertilizer shown under the heading Recommendations are the most important
parts of the soil test report. Rates are given in units of lbs/M, which is the same as lbs/1000 ft" If you
have a 3750-ft2 lawn and are advised to apply 40 lbs/M, then the amount of lime or fertilizer to add is 150
lbs, or (3750 ft2 / 1000 ft2) x 40 lbs.
The type or grade of fertilizer recommended depends on the soil test level of phosphorus and potassium.
A fertilizer recommendation might be, for example, 20 lbs of 10-10-10 per 1000 ft2 or an equivalent
fertilizer, such as l0 lbs of 20-20-20. NOTE 4, enclosed with your report, shows how to calculate fertilizer
rates from different sources. When phosphorus (P-1) and potassium (K-I) indices are higher than 50,
nitrogen will be the only fertilizer recommended. A typical nitrogen recommendation would be 1.0 lb N/
1000 ft2. Ammonium nitrate (33.5% N) applied at 3.0 lbs would provide 1.0 lb of nitrogen. For
centipedegrass, the annual nitrogen rate is 0.5 lb/1000 ft2.
The optimum pH for most turfgrasses, vegetables, shrubs, and annual and perennial flowers ranges
from 6.0 to 6.5. Acid -loving plants, such as azaleas and rhododendrons, do better at a pH between 5.0
and 5.5. The optimum pH for centipedegrass is 5.5. Maintaining the proper pH is just as important as
applying fertilizer. For additional information on lime and fertilizer application, see NOTE 4: Lawns,
Gardens and Ornamentals enclosed with your report.
Soil Test Index
Crop Response to Nutrient Application
Range
Rating
Pbospborus
Potassium
Manganese
Zinc
Copper
0-10
Very Low
Very High
Very High
Very High
Very High
Very High
11-25
Low
High
High
High
High
High
26-50
Medium
Medium *
Medium *
None
None
None
51-100
High
None
Low -None
None
None
None
100+
Very High
None
None
None
None
None
decreases as soil test index increases.
t � ,
Abbreviations
MIAs
mineral soil
M-0
mineral -organic soil
0
organic soil
HM%
percent humic matter
W/V
-weight/volume_ofsoil
CEC
cation exchange capacity
BS%
percent of GEC occupied by bases
Ac
acidity (decreases as pH increases)
P-1
phosphorus index
K-1
potassium index
Ca
calcium
Mg
magnesium
Mn-1
manganese index
Mn-AI
manganese availability index
Zn-1
zinc index
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Cu-1
copper index
S-I
sulfur index
SS-1
soluble salt index
NO}-N
nitrate nitrogen (ppm)
NH4 N
ammonium nitrogen (ppm)
Na
sodium
K20
potash
P205
phosphate
B
boron
copies
were printed at a cost of $626.22 or $0.02 per copy.

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Ralei
, NC 2760776465 . 919 733-2655
Report No: 20266
Grower: Squires Homes
Copies to:
Attn: Sean Abernathie
3701 National Dr Suite 101
E.)
oil Test
Raleigh, NC 27612
Report
Farm:
2/15/00 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Wake County
Agronomist Comments:
B 4
1 divided the sample you submitted into 4 subsamples. Test results are fairly consistent. Results are better than 1 expected with soil pH not excessively
low, a
very high phosphorus level and a
moderate potassium level. Based on the zinc and copper levels found, there is no evidence of a waste contamination problem with any of the samples. I decided
to go ahead and give lawn
recommendations for all samples.
1. Kent Messick
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime N P205 Igo Mg Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
I No Crop
1st Crop: Lawn
0 (1.0 lbs Nitrogen or EQUIV PER 1000 SQ FT)
4
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V GEC BS% Ac pH P-I
K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1 SS-1 NO3 N NIh-N Na
MIN 0.22 0.87
5.6 89.0 0.6 6.0 141
51 62.0 24.0 231 300 300
354
42 DA
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime N P205 KO Mg Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
2 No Crop
lst Crop: Lawn
0 (1.0 lbs Nitrogen or EQUIV PER 1000 SQ FT)
4
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1
K I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1 SS -I NQ8-N NIh-N Na
MIN 0.18 0.91
5.2 88.0 0.6 5.8 125
56 59.0 25.0 208 254 254
293
45 0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime N P105 &0 Mg Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
3 No Crop
1st Crop: Lawn
0 (1.0 lbs Nitrogen or EQUIV PER 1000 SQ FT)
4
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1
K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI (1) Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zn-M
Cu-I
S-1 SS -I NQ5-N A7&N Na
MIN 0.22 0.92
4.5 87.0 0.6 5.7 105
51 57.0 20 188 227 227
278
42 0A

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 ReedyCreek Road Raleigh, NC
27607-6465 '
919) 733-2655 Grower: Squires Homes
Re rt No: 20266 Pg 2
Field information
Applieid Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
4 No Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Ist Crop: Lawn
2nd Crop:
Lime
0
N M5 100 Mg Cu Zn
(7.0 lbs 15-0-14 or EQUIV PER 1000 SQ FT)
B Mn See Note
4
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
MIN 0.18 0.82 4.7 89.0
Ac pH P-I K I
0.5 5.8 109 48
Ca% Mg%
59.0 26.0
Mu-1 Mn-AI (1) Mu -Al (2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1
169 200 200 260
S-I SS-1 NOB-N ATh-N Na
44 0.1

USDA
4, F-t j, ,
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
4405 Bland Rd.
Suite 205
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Mr. Sean Abernathie
Squires Homes
3701 National Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27612
45 ,`.
May 4, 1999� '
Re: fielder's Pond —Request for hog lagoon closure information
Dear Mr. Abernathie:
This letter is in response to your April 20, 1999 request for information from the NRCSIWake
Soil and Water Conservation District files regarding the hog lagoon on the above referenced
property. Specifically, you requested "access to the Conservation District office files on this
property to see if the hog pond (lagoon) was properly disposed of and signed off in accordance
with the applicable regulations". Additionally, you were "interested in what kind of disposal
liability comes with purchase of this property".
First, your letter did not make reference to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), but we view
this as an FOIA request and are responding accordingly. Secondly, we understand the current
owner is McGregor Development Company and not Mr. Gelder, the original landowner to whom
NRCS provided technical assistance. Therefore, the Conservation District office files are
maintained under the jurisdiction of a previous private landowner and are therefore subject to the
FOIA and the Privacy Act.
By copy of this letter, I am advising that the local NRCS/District office may only release the
following:
1.) the lagoon closure plan, and
2.) the cleanup report prepared by the District office and provided to the NC Division of
Water Quality and the Wake County Health Department.
Since these documents are already a matter of public information with the other agencies, I am
requesting our NRCS District Conservationist, Mr. Steve Woodruff, to send these two documents
to you directly. All other file materials and documents should be protected from any public
disclosure.
Regarding the "liability question" with regards to purchase of the property, NRCS is unable to
comment or advise you on any liability issues. I trust this response and copies of the information
provided by Mr. Woodruff will satisfy your needs. If you question the adequacy of this FOIA
response, you may appeal in writing within 45 days of this letter. Your appeal should be '
addressed to: Mr. Pearlie Reed, Chief, USDA-NRCS, P.O. Box 2890, Washington, DC 20013.
Please write "FOIA Appeal" on the outside of the envelope.
Sincerely,
George L. Stem
Assistant State Conservationist for Water Resources and FOIA Officer
Cc: Tom Wetmore, NRCS udy Garrett, DWQ Regional Office
Steve Woodruff, NRCS Rick Roe, Wake Environmental Health Services
Larry Petrovick, Wake SWCD
The Natural Resources Conservation Service works hand -in -hand with the
American people to conserve natural resources on private land AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

• A 9eazc Hilmes Cmipanr •
QUIRES
April 20, 1999
Mr. George Stern
NRCS State Office
4405 Bland Road, Suite 205
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Gelders Pond
Dear Mr. Stem:
In talking with Mr. Larry Petrovic at Wake Soil and Water Conservation District I was
given your name and address. I am currently in a 60 day due diligence period on a tract
of land known as Gelders Pond. The tract is located south of Mann's Loop Road to the
west of Bells Lake Road in Wake County. Historically the site contained a hog farm.
The purpose of my letter is to request access to the Conservation District files on this
property to see if the hog pond was properly disposed of and signed off in accordance
with the applicable regulations. In addition I am interested in what kind of disposal
liability comes with the purchase of this property.
Please contact me as soon as possible to schedule a meeting if you agree with my request.
I may be reached at 881-8457 ext. 233 or beeped at 857-7207. Thank you in advance for
your attention to this request.
Sincerely,
'G'H. V L
can Abernathie. P.E.
Squires Homes
3701 National Drive / Suite 101 1 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 '
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
C. W. Gelder
C. W. Gelder Hog Operation
Route 1, Box 216
Norlina, NC 27563
Dear Mr. Gelder:
LT.R;TA
�w� e
EDEHNR
January 3, 1996
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of N.C.
General Statute(s) 143-215.1(a)(1)
Wake County
File No. CF 95-10
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against C. W. Gelder in the amount of
$3,282.16 including $282.16 in investigative costs.
Attached isa copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was taken
under the authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any continuing
violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure
for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the
assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of
your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office
the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement which you
believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the
petition must be served on the Department as follows:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDEHNR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within th__ irty days, as evidenced by a
date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this
matter being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action
to collect the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for
future violations which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
�j A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc Raleigh='Regional-Supervisor-w/-attachments=::z,
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
C. W. GELDER
FOR A VIOLATION OF
G.S. 143-215(e)
CONSTRUCTING A CONVEYANCE FOR
WILLFULLY DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS
TO WATERS OF THE STATE
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
File No. CF 95-10
}
} FINDINGS AND DECISION
} AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
}
}
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A, I, A. Preston
Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM), make the
following:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. C. W. Gelder owns a hog facility located on State Road 1391, 0.3 road miles
south of the junction with SR 1386 in Franklin County, North Carolina.
B . On March 10, 1995, DEM staff observed a discharge of wastewater by a man-made
ditch from the facility's lagoon to an Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek in the Neuse
Basin. which are Class C NSW Waters.
C. Mr. C. W. Gelder willfully discharged pollutants to waters of the State.
D. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totalled $282.16.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mr. C. W. Gelder is a "person" within the meaning of G.S.143-215.6A ,pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek constitutes waters of the State within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1) pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C . The above -cited discharge constituted constructing a conveyance for the willful
discharge of pollutants from an animal feeding operation to waters of the State
pursuant to 143-215(e).

D. Mr. C. W. Gelder may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-
215(e), which provides the Commission the authority to assess fines and penalties not
to exceed five thousand dollars ($5000.00) for the first offense for the willful
discharge of pollutants from an animal,feeding operation to waters of the State.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mr. C. W.
Gelder pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
F . The Director, Division of Environmental Management, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil penalties in this
matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Mr. C. W. Gelder is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ for constructing a conveyance for the willful discharge of pollutants
from an animal feeding operation to waters of the State.
$ 3 Do 0- TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is Gfl percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215(e).
$ 282.16 Enforcement costs.
$ 30 8' 1, / (r TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Ar A6�
(Dat A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management

C. W. Gelder
Route 1, Box 126
Norlina, NC 27563
May 17, 1995
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.F.
NC Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Notice of violation per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)
Dear Mr. Howard:
��6� D
MAY 191g?5
DEHNR RALEIGO REGIONAL OFFICE
I have received your letter dated April 27, 1995. A copy of that letter is
attached hereto for clarification.
I wish to advise that I was not responsible for operating any production of hogs
on my farm located in Wake County,'NC. The farming operation was carried on
exclusively by Lynwood Carroll who leased the premises from me. Mr. Lynwood
Carroll is the gentleman who constructed the lagoon located on my land and such
lagoon was placed on my land without any specific permission from me and without
advising me that the lagoon was being constructed. You will note that I am a
non-resident landowner.
Mr. Lynwood Carroll advised me in the middle of 1994 that he was going out of the
hog business and that he would not be leasing from me after the end of December,
1994. I went to the farm in January of•1995 and I noted that the lagoon itself
had no real water located in it and the sludge bed, however, was wet. At that
time, I thought it practical to endeavor to get, the sludge bed dry so that
machinery could be used to clean up the lagoon and properly dispose of the sludge
that was located in the bottom of the lagoon. Unfortunately, while the drainage
was taking place, very heavy rains came on March 8 and 9 and a great deal of
water got into the lagoon and escaped through the trench.
At the time that I was trying to get the lagoon -in shape to be cleaned, I was not
aware that the trench violated any regulations. I am not a farmer and I am not
aware of environmental health regulations. I have been, in the construction
business prior to my retirement and I was doing what.I thought was practical in
connection with making a permanent solution to a problem that I recognized.
It has been a long time since I have been involved in any farming operation and
the rearing of hogs which most recently took place on the farm was done by
Lynwood Carroll. I am not going to lease the farm to anybody else to raise swine
on the farm and I do not need a continuation of the deemed permit for the
elimination of waste and no application is being made at this time.

Page Two
Mr. A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
May 17, 1995
I am interested in getting a plan to close out the facility and to clean up the
problem.
Yesterday, May 16, 1995, I met with Judy Garrett and Danny Smith in the Regional
Office in Raleigh. I discussed your letter with them and outlined for them the
same things that are enumerated in this letter. I have also met on the farm with
Larry Petrovick who is with the Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
relative to providing me with a plan to clean up the lagoon and the environmental
problem. As soon as this plan has been completed, a copy will be sent to you for
your approval prior to the time that the work is done.
In the meantime, I wish to advise that the trench in the lagoon has been stopped
up and there is no further seepage coming through the dam and there is no further
discharge from the lagoon. I have constructed diversion ditches around the
lagoon so that no additional run off water will go into the lagoon that will
cause a problem.
In your letter, you want to know when the trench was dug in the lagoon and the
length of time that it was in place. I do not know exactly since I was in
Florida, but it was sometime after the middle of January, 1995 that the trench
was dug in the dam and it was made deeper from time to time over a period of
about six weeks. The trench in the lagoon was stopped up and the discharge was
discontinued immediately on March 10 after notification by Mr. Danny Smith. Lime
was also applied on any areas where any of the discharge had gone upon any
adjacent lands at the direction of Danny Smith.
In every instance I have tried to cooperate in this matter and I wish to advise
that I will continue to do everything possible to aid you in connection with
this.
Very truly ours,
C. W. Gelder
Copy to: Ms. Judy Garrett
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Mr: Larry Petrovick
4001-D Carya Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GENFRAL
e R.
State of North Carolina
Department of Justice
P. O. BOX 629
RALEIGH REPLY TO:
27602.0629
Anita LeVeaux Quigless
Environmental Division
Telephone No. [phone]
Fax [phone]
September 20, 1996 C �' r t4
Mr. Edgar R. Bain SEP 2 6 1996
Bain & McRae
Post Office Box 99 EG RALEIGFf
REGIONAL OFFICE
Lillington, North Carolina 27546 REG
RE: Payment of Settlement
C.W. Gelder
Wake County, CIF 96-009
Dear Mr. Bain:
On behalf of the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources this letter
will acknowledge receipt of your check number 6943, in the amount of $382.16. This payment
constitutes a complete and full settlement of the above referenced matter.
I am closing my file on this matter. If you have any further questions concerning this
case, please contact me.
ALQ/na
cc: Dianne Wilburn
Ken Schuster
ep13166
Sincerely,
Anita LeVeaux Quigle p
Assistant Attorney General
ran Equal Opportunity / Affirmalive Action Employer e3

o ,.5urio [J
t..
State of North Carolina
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice
ATTORNEY GENERAL P. O. BOX 629
RALEfGi-I REPLY TO: Anita LeVeaux Quigless
Environmental Division
27602-0629 Telephone No. [phone]
Fax [phone]
September 20, 1996
Mr. Edgar R. Bain
D
Bain & McRae
Post Office Box 99 Sip 2 bW 07
Lillington, North Carolina 27546 I}«JFin
RE: Payment of Settlement
C.W. Gelder
Wake County, CF 96-009
Dear Mr. Bain:
On behalf of the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources this letter
will acknowledge receipt of your check number 6943, in the amount of $382.16. This payment
constitutes a complete and full settlement of the above referenced matter.
I am closing my file on this matter. If you have any further questions concerning this
case, please contact me.
ALQ/na
cc: Dianne Wilburn
Ken Schuster
ep13166
Sincerely,
Anita LeVeaux Quigle s
Assistant Attorney General
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Emplgyer Q3

L�
0
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District ^=-�
Agricultural Services Building
t001 Carya Drive, Suite D • Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 • [phone]
ivir. to. vv. uumer
Rt. 1 Box 126
Norlina, NC 27563
Dear Mr. Gelder,
June 23, 1995
This letter is in regards to a letter dated April 27, 1995 from the NC Division of Environmental
Management (DEM), concerning your abandoned animal operation.
On May 12, 1995 you contacted me for technical assistance in developing a waste management
plan for waste utilization and a plan for closure of the abandoned treatment lagoon. Frank Evans,
(NRCS) Peggy Redmond, (Wake Co. Health Dept.) and I met with you at the lagoon site to discuss
ideas for cleanup. I have talked with you by phone a number of times in regards to the sludge
disposal alternatives, etc.
Attached is your copy of the "Waste Management Plan for Waste Utilization and Closure of the
Abandoned C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment Lagoon". It was developed based upon your planned
method of sludge removal and waste receiving fields you supplied us with, waste application at
agronomic rates, NCDA Waste and Soil Reports, existiin crops, sludge and waste water estimates,
and acceptable standards and specifications agreeetom by USDA Natural Resources Conservation
Service and the North Carolina Department of Health and Natural Resources Division of
Environmental Management. This plan will remain valid as long as it is followed as written. Not
following the plan may result in action from the Division of Environmental Management.
The acreage of waste receiving fields and crop was not adequate to spread the waste according to
agronomic rates during a one year time frame. Hence, it will take from fourteen to twenty-one
months to distribute the waste over the limited acreage at agronomic rates.
Today I made arrangements with you, Danny Smith of DEM, Frank Evans of NRCS, Peggy
Redmond of Wake Co. Health Dept. to meet with me at 9:30 a. m., Wednesday, June 28, 1995. 1
also invited John and Danny Matthews via their phone answering machine. The purpose of the
meeting is to review, clarify, and discuss the plan, obtain signatures, and provide copies of the plan
to the above meeting participants.
Please call me if you have questions. -.
Sincerely,
lall�e ;:��) �,,
Larry Petrovick
Natural Resource Conservationist
Enclosures ✓
cc: Mr. John T. Matthews, Frank Evans NRCS, Peggy Redmond Wake Co. Health Dept., Danny
Smith DEM, NC Div. of Soil and Water Conservation

()/
Waste Management Plan for Waste Utilization and Closure
of the Abandoned C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment Lagoon

• 0
Table of Contents
Section I Standardized Plan
Section II Field Legend and Maps
Section III Plan Narrative
Section IV Calculations and References

�oF.FKr copy
a.
-
--
. .............WASTE UTILIZATION;.PLAN... ......
Producer: Clarence W. Gelder -
Location: Mann' s Loop Rd. \, Apex, NC ,
Telephone: [phone] NC Address: Rt. 1 Box 126 Norlina, NC 27563
FL: 407-221-0201 FL Address: 2853 SW Lakemont Palm City, FL 34990
Type Operation: Swine
Waste Management Plan for Waste Utilization and Closure of the
Number of animals : Abandoned C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment Lagoon
(Design Capacity). No Animals are present.
The waste from your an'_.^ial facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization
plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are
strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally sa=e
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as
they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation
exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than
5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff
to surface waters which is not allowed under OEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to.avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production and to reduce the potential for pollution,,the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not
more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based.on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find informat'_on on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.'
1

ATT a C 1E.0 A
to
2-Ile--:�p
LAST
and CIosure- +ke A-b-1 -id coc<< C'.4),6-eIder GrI<,sf-r Tr_C17-r e,,t
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
See 4#-ad7ment D for C'alculot ffe)JI-,
1C1 animals X -- (amt.') waste/animal/year = -- (amt.)
waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrccen PAN Pr a er �Year/J►4 animals X�lbs. PAN/animal/year = Z 793 1AN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
Tract Field
No.
O U)11 4
Table 1:
sail Crop
Type J. G-elder
ACRES OWNED BY
(Fee_ 'Tab[ 3)
Lbs, N * Acres
Per Ac.
T-!;Z�4o
PRODUCER �r "SkWllter 4?p11c4lie6
Lbs. N Month of
Utilized Anplication
NON
MORir
MEMMIMMMM
O©
MOON
AWNNOMME
MON
MENOWN
IMIMMMUFARY-9
W.
_. .. .
I
-� -I- Total I 13. �5 I vy ff v I
* VUS N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
.r
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require fanners in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
I1io�e J /Vof< a: 51ud9e maj beaPPlip-Aon Fo-e/d /, T-SD4o afa riAe_ Aof JO �eYCee,( /40/63.A)
��p /•pc.,
Oh e Z,s Rom, 4. avG�labl� [4+�A SN o� Welsf rGva�er, T{�e 51i dJreMeLy �
1

E
0
ATTAC c-LNIE N T A
.._WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
.....
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land (see Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
'Sn h v% -T Ma+F-6,, to 4 T 5D.)-
��02
i
I I
I I
I f
,u
I esc e.•
I Z 70 1
1 &119 15- fit or
2
l e c4e
1 270
I
I zS 8 I IS -Dec. of
R h es 114f.VN
0
d
D I IS -Deco o�
d r[
s'
e e
270
1 -Z
1 6 S/Y ec
b
I
cKz
O
j
�Scu
-7D
L
1 3 I
I I
8 1
1
Esc 1
Z70
z o
D I
I
I
1 FeSCu e- 1 00
1 /,Y I
q?o I
I
IG' I
I sek e- 1 2-70 1s.7
4 I
I r/ I
Isc k i Z76 1
s 1
S I L 1
I I I I I
i
I
Total I /0,(,� I 2r10y. I
i
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 1 � S
Table 2 0 • bc!
Total o . 4
Amoun of N Produced 2-_?� 93
Surplus or Deficit �y
ce,, May
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The
sludge will he nutrient rich and will require precautionary
Measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
3

•
i ^r% tiT A
STE--UTILIZATION-:-
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of waste water.
-c,b)e 3 k1GSfe Ljafe r
Application of Waste by Irrigation
�2R�T Field Soil Type Crap Application Application
No. Rate(In/Hr) Aimount(In.)
.Sb6G
TSZS TABLE I5 NOT RBED€D IX WAS:E I5 NOT B$ING APPLIED BY IRRZ=IOW, HOWEVER A 5:.YSL,1R :A= wn.L BE'
Hz=w FOR DRY LZ=--R OR SLURRY.
Your fac_lit 's designed fo ys of temooXq��tf
ge and
the tempor storage must be oved on the avere ever'lN 5. In no iance ould the volumebeing
stor Ln yo strut a exceed El ation
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (fo=erly
Soil Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District
office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance
in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative of Oeeraticn:
St' e /4 7 laC- h ro e,7 f e -
re -(I f0,74r4t+L

_----�-.:_ .__ . ._
STE.....,VTILIZ,TION- PLAN
.............
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state
by runoff, drift, marr..ade conveyances, d'_=ect application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil, penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the
discharge continues.
Z. The Field Office must have documentation in the design
folder thac the producer either owns or has long term
access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS with a
copy of a w-ritten agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable prox:.mitp, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the
life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an
update of the Waste utilization Plan when.there is a
change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil
type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RES) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate
filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field.
These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers''
required by DF-M. (See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Steins
and Standard 390 (Interin) - Riparian Forest Buffers.]'
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking
after waste application. Waste should not be applied when
the wind is blowing. -
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorrarated on conventionally
tilled cropland. then applied to ccnservaticn tided
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided
the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Vacher and Cl pate in North Carolina" in
the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)

W
• C. ".
A-STE. UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Condnaoe)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the
soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur
offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No
pending should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of
application..
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils,
during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the
leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with'a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters
that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied.in a manner not to reach other
property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by aver -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
'discharge directly into water courses, and only then at
agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.
I

T I JrZATI-ON PLAN.......
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
ieoncinuedl
15. Domestic and industr_al waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shah, not be discharged
into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide
adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storlm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). if needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited
to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and
structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eli.*ninate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and
erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc.,
should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent
breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
7

* • ATTkC!iN Eti_T A
- .WASTE ;UTILIZATTWEPLA-
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: L.. W • c e-Id 'e'r
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (OEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed on -site at the farce office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
be available for review by DEX upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: AlrPnct W. t�e ilXP1r
(Please priest)
Signature : Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Fran le -Evans err %trvvrck
Affiliation: N RC.S / `Ji4KC_- .5W<11
Address (Agency) : DO t - b/Q.
C/ 1 r 2. j !J r /0 .5 v
Signature: 2!2 ,,,=A _ 'E,omz-, _ _ Date: � -2 8 -- z
8

A
i •
WASTE UTILIZATION .PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Xaedad only If addltlooal land has to be leaaod, *cc.;
1, SO� h r N1c4-�Jhe w S , hereby give C, LJ. 6 e-W f1 r
permission to apply anal waste from his Waste Utiizat_on System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Landowner: M Date: �12
Waste Producer: (�i: / }/ Date:
Technical Representative: Date: - -gJ---
SWCD Representative: CG2 Date: 2f_-5, S
Terra of Agreement: n e , 19 `y-to -371 n 1g17
{XlaiAtta at :an years on Cast Shared Stags)
(Sew Required Specification No. 2.) Or /Dh 'C I S'nPPr_���

m Attachment
North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service Iof 3
Agri-Waste
Ma--n-agement
Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using,nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump or propeller,agitator.
b. Take subsamples from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Attachment B •
2 of 3
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint"to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of 10-15, pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c: Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle. within 1' of liquid surface,
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, -and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take l subsample there and the
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about 2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal,
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

Attachment B
_3- 3of3
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab,
7621 Whitepine Road
Richmond, VA 23237
Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
2320 S. Foster Avenue
Vheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, W7 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/'Solution Advisory Section
Slue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca, Hg, t
S, Fe, Kn, Zn, Cu $
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, Ho, Cd, NI., b

Map Legend
for 1 " = 660' Photos
Areas to spread sludge
Areas to spread waste water from lagoon
Suffer areas, Do not spread sludge or
waste water in these areas,
(See Attachment A'Required
Specifications')
S�
Houses or other dwellings

rlr�a 4 rtJ" !yt'7.'�1� •; �� 4rj�Yf ��kr
� r '�� k' `�ti •5r
A
gt}�Y� r , sl ti r it yr�Y,C.
�w srIa��I
o
ki
r 1LL
,j •y qq
t 1,,,,. ;, T :.• y�l.r.� • v � ,tis� � r.T x'{'� f i ,! a t�i'``„�`�c' �'• .�+'�' f. r ` E � � �����4l�'•T�,1 y ��t'a`'yi li �I ri y - y f. mil} �4 .tr'.���u
J.1 t r• 11 ) tv •
r i F
t ���.�5�' - tz ,� S•?r1E�sy��.,i(!,S ��: '+:. 1 �wi r �� �'��^t yi:
�� • r��'t` �rrl;Lis3's�'�d6`.h �h .'" r y ~ � �yr!'X�i is� ..y t, a.`3
�*��•Lf:. ��g��l t'�i r��.u3 kr i� r �; c y,�.r a5 r�fr � '� �_'1 l' 1"•
{�'F: ! •s�y4 tti"l,`ri}1 �'.— r .�'.� �y?.,r�\rfr� �,Y J.,�p .
°{V•�IR' Ir .�dSt�fa +ri't� T}r ��y� � �., 'S, �t9: "•.;.;.�ti'.i a:�. ���r=Nr..r
(rd
r�''y3�i51`h '�..i''
-y�is 1�` 1:.t,�k
7�v r t
�. 1 ��f. �4�`♦ r i� r' 1 S t 2f 5�Ld =s {x���,
!' ��t 7 { 1 s • 1
���kvrliT� \ k'���•t�,Y a�'t• 4 � '�'i r'7iF
K' � y F � 'a�lt�il r��i�r'� r, 'hr•, � y �,ar
Y'�,,.5 -� !'i �'•'. G r41 i sr Sty} - , 'd '3
s'
f' t1 ��{ iriA �.:r'� 1J 1i',r„ �y�:#.a:�i "tt'• 9.
a .,- 7' r .ft5 n. t.r ti iv�r: � R �n �y &•r '� ` �t}�.'�c_ t; !!.
rr` e, �1w +.t rr ,?,i�! }``f ��F �y��+ � � ��s l .':?•,. :'. e A,t'r �� +C� ZN^�J �:}•II;�Y� �t� �'.y `7 Ssj � ...r ., ,.`,
.�. �,._ , l,.�tyr�t,r.r..:,rs. .z: t. se ' x4ii,• � ,t- t
'1'r`•s•�."7"�;��"+f"Irw+'T"
,ie
�•��t*f�z.'. r-1f 1�•11 of �p �� ti t> >,••,: t.$r rr r�yr�Y:

IZ
Attachment C
Narrative of Operation
Waste Management Plan
for Waste Utilization and Closure
of the
Abandoned C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment Lagoon
The followin,9 items are an integral part of the "Waste Management Plan
for Waste Utilization and Closure of the Abandoned C. W. Gelder Waste
Treatment Lagoon".
1. The breach shall be repaired to the original shape of existing dam and
planted with permanent vegetation.
2. Existing buildings will be removed according to Wake Co. Health Dept.
and Wake Co. Solid Waste regulations.
3. Landowner plans to dip out sludge and stockpile on areas adjacent to
waste treatment lagoon so that the sludge will dry out. The sludge will be
land applied, at agronomic rates by a manure spreader. All sludge liquids
will be diverted back into the existing lagoon until the sludge is land
applied. Diversions will be installed around the sludge drying and storage
area to divert clean water runoff away from the sludge stockpile and
lagoon.
4. The sludge is to be applied on Mr. John T. Matthews land according to
the agronomic rates specified on Attachment A, page 3, Table 2 of the
"Waste Management Plan for Waste Utilization and Closure of the
Abandoned C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment Lagoon". The lagoon water Is
to be applied on Gelder's fields by Irrigation according to rates indicated
on Attachment A, page 2 Table 1, and page 4, Table 3 of the above plan.
5. The water level In the lagoon shall be kept such that a minimum.of two
feet of freeboard exists at all times.
6. According to the sludge estimate, NCDA Waste and Soil Reports, the
land available, present crop, NRCS and DFM standards and
specifications, it will take tuQ_c1LQw_Lng seasons to roe land apply all of
the sludge. For example: If the sludges inAugust 15 to
December 1, 1995, at the agronomic rates shown on Attachment A, Table
2, the second application would be applied no sooner than August 15 to
December 1, 1996. If the sludge is applied February 1 to May 1, 1996, then
the second application would be February 1 to May 1, 1997.

•
Attachment C - C. W. Gelder Waste Mgt. Plan (continued) page 2
7. Once all the stockpiled sludge has been applied, the lagoon Is to be
pumped completely dry and any remaining sludge in the lagoon will be
removed and land applied at agronomic rates. Once this has been
completed, the dam can be breached and the material in the dam can
be spread over the lagoon area. All disturbed areas will be permanently
vegetated. Contact MRCS for vegetation recommendations.
8. If sludge is stockpiled off Gelder's site, surface water shall be diverted
away from the sludge stockpile and the stockpile shall be covered and
kept dry. This is to avoid waste water runoff into the surface waters which
Is not allowed under Division of Environmental Management regulations.
9. Any waste that is hauled on public roads should be hauled such that no
waste will fall on the roads or adjacent areas.
10. If conditions develop in the application of this plan such that the plan
must be changed, contact DEM to get their approval before the change
has started.

a, ��/f• S c� o� mac' 4� �~'���9�8�� t-Ule CL,, ZCO
Irwr/& d e4 ,6 Z e b � (,P/f &d ehZ-)(te bItL/-bt1)
-.7�H/f. -/ ,�Jd�
te" fW _ ram/ _ /s- a
�4Wn7 B�
QN —I v
s

z-)L'z z
ru o11 e5) ! r
�e-2
bg L

PA4

.FUN-16-1995 15:17 FROM DEM [DATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.01/03
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Agiculm-Al S'crvices Building
W I Carya Drive, Suite D - Raleigh. North Csrolina 27610 • [phone]
FAQ TR"ShU ION SHEET
Wake Boll And Water Conservation
Agricultural Sbrvlces Building
4001-D 4arya Drive
Raleigh, NC,
Fe (919) 250- 097 1
DEPT/AGENCY: 06-kr f
DATE: 6 , -
FAX NUMBER 731
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(excluding comer sheet)
FROM: v c
PHONE NUMBER
6a r�s� ab. C.��-
i E9d " Jdr� A.: « l0�-31ltJt'1-dCtSE1 WO E zE = w [ L�e, 81 NRI'

r
r
JUN-16-1995 15:18 FROM DEN DATER QUALITY SECTION TO RRO P.02iO3
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
AgriauImral Strvieces BuUdins
$001 CaryaDrive, Suite D • Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 - [phone]
Mr, Danny Smith June! 16,1096
DEHNR
DMsion of Environmental Management
Water Quality Planning Branch
P. O. Box
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Smith:
This letter Is In regard to the C. W. Gelder Abandoned Swine Lagoon
cleanup (NOV 14). On June 13, 19% 1 called you for Information on
maximum clean up duration. You asked me to write this letter to give you
some Information about how the cleanup'is progressing.
On May 12, 19961 received a call from Mr. -Gelder. He wanted some
technical asslstance in order to dean up the abandoned hog waste
pond,
On May 16, 1996, Mr. Gelder, Frank Fvans (NRCS), Peggy Redmond (Wake
J'.. L1r.nn tics►+) and M self rrn^i isn. hcr+Fn rlfrrnnlnn t? � m r•tM,nr rrN of thiz
vv. r r�,uur r v..�, J �....0 r�vvrr r r r. l .v .~W r 1 W,�, n m ,a ---- (r . ' .. I_
abandoned waste pond. later In a phor)a conversation I gave Mr.
Gelder a couple of names of contract sludge haulers as well as the name
of a pasture owner who might be open to accepting sludge.
On May 25, 1995 Tom Hill and I probed the waste pond to get an estimate
of waste volume.
On May 30, 1996, 1 called Mr. Gelder. He and Mr. John T. Matthews
pumped two building pits out into the waaste pond, to keep them #corn
running over. Mr. Gelder told met that John T. Matthews would accept
the sludge to apply on his fescue. 1 told Gelder according to our
calculations he d need about 125 ac. of improved coastal bermuda, in
order to get rid of the -waste at one time, right now. This amount and type
of land Is not available in the area. "there are quite a number of houses
nearby the site and no acceptable available fields.
On June 1. 1995 Mr. Matthews Invited me to check out his place for sludge
application. He hod about 60 acres available. Miriam Gardner NRCS
District Conserve lonist and I checked the Matthews site out.
On ,tune 13, 1995, Mr. Gelder called me. He was very Interested in getting
his waste management plan as soon as possible. He told me that he had
Matthews strengthen the breech pact of the dam and that some of the
building demolition was underway.
Right now, the Gelder land and Matthews land is not adequate to
agronomically apply oil the sludge and waste water at one time.
222 • 90bd woad ce : ei ss . 91 mnr

JUN-16-1995 15:18 FROM DEN WATER DUALITY SECTION TO RRO
** 800139Hd -1U1.01 **
P.03iO3
Leiter to Mr, Danny Smith re: Gelder NOV - - page 2
As of this morning (June 16, 1995) Frank Evans CET, NRCS and my self have
drawn up a draft waste management plan to' apply the sludge and waste
water at agronomic rates. this plan Will take fourteen to twen"ne
months to complete. This draft plan is subject to ML G►e1ders and Mr.
Matthews' approval.
In general terms, Frank and I are proposing to pump the waste pond
water on Mr. Gelder's adjacent fields. Mr. Gelder and Mr. Matthews have
proposed to dip the sludge out, place it on a building pad on the waste
pond bank, divert clean water away, and divert the sludge leachate and
Incidental water to go back Into the waste pond. The sludge would be
trucked to Matthews place, stockpiled, measures Installed to prevent
polluted runoff, and sludge applied at agronomic rates.
I hope to have approval of Mr. Gelder and Mr. Matthews next week -
Please call me If you have any questions.
sincerely,
1014�
Larry Petrovlck
Natural Resource Conservationist
cc: Mr. C. W. Gelder
coo '3edd
•t + N0QD -aAbm-uasn wod i oo : E i s6 , s l Nnr
TOTAL P.03

MICHAEL F. EASt,EY
ATTORNEY GENERAL.
--MEMORANDUM--
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
"
State of North Carolina
Department of Justice
A. Preston Howard
Harlan K. Britt
Kenneth Schuster
P. O. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Anita L. Quiglps
R A LE I G H
Environmental Division
Tel. [phone]
2 7 r02-0629
Pax.(919) 733.079 t"
jnj � `JJ i�l�
ll
L
jut— _�10
Judy Garrett
Danny Smith
Anita L. Quigless, Assistant Attorney General
June 26, 1996
C.W. Gelder, 96 EHR 0415
On May 3, 1996, I contacted your office asking that the civil penalty assessment in the
aforementioned case be rescinded because the wrong county had been identified in the
assessment. On May 14, 1996 a modified civil penalty assessment was issued and the correct
county was properly set out. Unfortunately, despite the fact that the earlier assessment was
retracted, the same case number was assigned to the subsequent assessment. This has caused a
lot of confusion in OAH. Please reissue this assessment with a new case number. If you have
any questions, please feel to call me at the number set out above. Thank you for your
consideration.
c: Kathy Cooper
Steve Tedder
Dianne Wilburn
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
E

d,,. SfATF
State of North Carolina
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Dep ar(ment of Justice
ATTORNEY GENERAL P. o, BOX 621')
REPLY TO: Anita L. Quigleas
RALEIGH
Environmental Division
Tel, [phone]
27602d 629
Fax.[phone]
--MEMORANDUM--
TO: Kenneth Schuster ,.
Judy Garrett
Danny Smith
FROM: Anita L. Quigless, Assistant Attorney Genera If
DATE: June 4, 1996
RE: C.W. Gelder, 96 EHR 0415
Please let me know the status of this case. Counsel for the Petitioner has not withdrawn
his petition and has told me that he does not intend to withdraw his petition. I was hoping that
the civil penalty would have been rescinded and another civil penalty issued naming the correct
county where C.W. Gelder's hog facility is located.
A prehearing statement has been filed by the Petitioner and the case has been scheduled
for hearing before the Honorable Beecher R. Gray the week of August 12, _ 1996. Time appears
to be of the essence. If you have any questions, please feel to call me at the number set out
above. Thank you for your consideration.
c: A. Preston Howard
Harlan K. Britt
Kathy Cooper
Steve Tedder
Dianne Wilburn
An Equal opportunity / Affirmative Action Employcr e3

C. W. Gelder
Route 1, Box 126
Norlina, NC 27563
May 17, 1995
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
NC Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Notice of violation per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)
Dear Mr. Howard:
�uu gar 19
DENNR RAiE1GH REG10NAi OFFICE
I have received your letter dated April 27, 1995. A copy of that letter is
attached hereto for clarification.
I wish to advise that I was not responsible for operating any production of hogs
on my farm located in Wake County, NC. The farming operation was carried on
exclusively by Lynwood Carroll who leased the premises from me. Mr. Lynwood
Carroll is the gentleman who constructed the lagoon located on my land and such
lagoon was placed on my land without any specific permission from me and without
advising me that the lagoon was being constructed. You will note that I am a
non-resident landowner.
Mr. Lynwood Carroll advised me in the middle of 1994 that he was going out of the
hog business and that he would not be leasing from me after the end of December,
1994. I went to the farm in January of 1995 and I noted that the lagoon itself
had no real water located in it and the sludge bed, however, was wet. At that
time, I thought it practical to endeavor to get the sludge bed dry so that
machinery could be used to clean up the lagoon and properly dispose of the sludge
that was located in the bottom of the lagoon. Unfortunately, while the drainage
was taking place, very.heavy rains came on March S and 9 and a great deal of
water got into the lagoon and escaped through the trench.
At the time that I was trying to get the lagoon in shape to be cleaned, I was not
aware that the trench violated any regulations. I am not a farmer and I am not
aware of environmental health regulations. I have been in the construction
business prior to my retirement and I was doing what I thought was practical in
connection with making a permanent solution to a problem that I recognized.
It has been a long time since I have been involved in any farming operation and
the rearing of hogs which most recently took place on the farm was done by
Lynwood Carroll. I am not going to lease the farm to anybody else to raise swine
on the farm and I do not need a continuation of the deemed permit for the
elimination of waste and no application is being made at this time.

Page Two
Mr. A. Preston Howard,
May 17, 1995
I am interested in getting a plan to close out the facility and to clean up the
problem.
Yesterday, May 16, 1995, I met with Judy Garrett and Danny Smith in the Regional
Office in Raleigh. I discussed your letter with them and outlined for them the
same things that are enumerated in this letter. I have also met on the farm with
Larry Petrovick who is with the Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
relative to providing me with a plan to clean up the lagoon and the environmental
problem. As soon as this plan has been completed, a copy will be sent to you for
your approval prior to the time that the work is done.
In the meantime, I wish to advise that the trench in the lagoon has been stopped
up and there is no further seepage coming through the dam and there is no further
discharge from the lagoon. I have constructed diversion ditches around the
lagoon so that no additional run off water will go into the lagoon that will
cause a problem.
In your letter, you want to know when the trench was dug in the lagoon and the
length of time that it was in place. I do not know exactly since I was in
Florida, but it was sometime after the middle of January, 199S that the trench
was dug in the dam and it was made deeper from time to time over a period of
about six weeks. The trench in the lagoon was stopped up and the discharge was
discontinued immediately on March 10 after notification by Mr. Danny Smith. Lime
was also applied on any areas where any of the discharge had gone upon any
adjacent lands at the direction of -Danny Smith.
In every instance I have tried to cooperate in this matter and I wish to advise
that I will continue to do everything possible to aid you in connection with
this.
Very jtruly ours,
-WW• //•
C. W. Gelder
Copy to: Ms. Judy Garrett
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Mr. Larry Petrovick
4001-D Carya Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610

State of North Carolina
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice Reply to: Anita LeVeaux Quigless
ATTORNEY GENERAL P. O. BOX 629 Environmental Division
RALEIGH [phone]
2 7602-062 P
[phone] (Fax)
May 3, 1996
Edgar R. Bain
Bain & McRae
P.O. Box 99
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: C.W. Gelder, 96 EHR 0415
Dear Mr. Bain:
In a letter dated January 3, 1996, a civil penalty was assessed against your client C.W.
Gelder in the amount of $3,282.16. A finding of fact in that civil penalty assessment, that your
client owns a hog facility located on State Road 1391, 0.3 road miles south of the junction with
SR 1386 in Franklin County, North Carolina, was in error. In fact, your client's hog facility is
located in Wake County. Accordingly, it is my belief that my client will rescind that civil
penalty. It is further my understanding that another civil penalty will thereafter be issued naming
the correct county. Once you receive the order rescinding the civil penalty, I hope that you will
withdraw your petition.
Thank you for your consideration.
c: Honorable Beecher R. Gray
Harlan K. Britt
Steve Tedder
Kenneth Schuster
Danny Smith
Sincerely,
al�-t
Anita LeVeai
Assistant Attt
Bar No. 13667
A. Preston Howard
Kathy Cooper
Danne Wilburn
Judy Garret
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

hit
State of North Carolina Tow
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources + v
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary [DEE
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director i�
April 27, 1995
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. C. W. Gelder
2853 SW Lakemont Place
Palm City, FL 34990
Subject: LOSS OF DEEMED PERMITTED STATUS
NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV 95-14
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)
Gelder Hog Facility
Wake County
Dear Mr. Gelder:
Animal Operations in the State have been deemed permitted by the Division of
Environmental Management in accordance with Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual nondischarge permit is not required if certain criteria are
met. A major requirement to be deemed permitted is that there must not be a discharge of my
wastewater from the operation to the waters of the State.
On March 10, 1995, Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a site
inspection of the subject facility due to a citizen's complaint. Mr. Smith observed an illegal
discharge of wastewater from your lagoon flowing at an estimated rate of 4 gallons per minute to
an unnamed tributary of Middle Creek (class C-NSW waters in the Neuse River basin). The cause
of the discharge was a man-made trench which emptied the contents of the lagoon, some
accumulated solids and storm event water from the lagoon. Mr. Snzdth contacted Mr: Clyde
Marsh, who explained a trench had been dug into the lagoon berm by a backhoe in order to reduce
the water level in the lagoon.
This letter serves as •a Notice of Violation and notification that your animal operation has
been found discharging wastewater to the surface waters of the State and is therefore no longer
deemed permitted as a nondischarge facility under 15A NCAC 2H .0217. Therefore the existing
wastewater treatment system serving your animal operation is currently being operated without a
permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North. Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If you wish to be reconsidered for coverage by the. deemed permitted provision of the Rule,
you must: 1)immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater; 2)make any modifications needed
to ensure there will be no future discharges; 3)send in an approved animal waste management plan
by completing the attached certification form.. This form and a copy of your plan must be returned
to:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will collect, store,
treat and land apply your animal waste to the land in an environmentally acceptable manner. To
assist you in the development of this plan and to provide the required certification that the plan is
acceptable, you should contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water
Conservation District, the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, or the North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service. If you choose to close out this facility, you will also be required to
submit a plan explaining how this will be accomplished.
If we have not received the requested certification within 60 days of receipt of this letter or
if there are additional discharges to the surface water, a civil penalty of up to $10,000 may be
assessed and you may be required to apply for an individual non discharge permit from the
Division. This permit, if issued, will contain monitoring and reporting requirements determined to
be necessary by the Division.
In addition to the receipt of your waste management plan, this office will require a written
response to this Notice of Violation within 30 days of its receipt. Your response should discuss
the elements of your waste management plan (including equipment, availability of land for waste
application) and any repairs made to your facility. Your response mustalso specifically explain
why the trench was placed in the lagoon berm and the length of time it was in place. Please send
this correspondence to the attention of Judy Garrett at the Raleigh Regional Office, 3800 Barnett
Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh., NC 27609.
Please carefully address each of the aforementioned issues in your responses. These and
other violations of North Carolina General Statutes may result in an assessment of civil penalties of
up to $10, 000 per day. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact either Judy Garrett, Water Quality Supervisor for our Raleigh Regional Office at (919) 571-
4700 or Dianne Williams Wilburn of our.Central Office staff at [phone], ext. 232.
Sincerely, 1
.e' Aj---4�
A. Preston Howard, J E.
cc: Judy Garrett - RRO
Wake County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wake County Health Department
NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Planning Branch
Of—" ions=l3irauclx
Mr. Clyde Marsh

Raleigh Regional Office
March 24, 1995
MEMORANDUM
To Dianne Wilburn FILE Through Kenneth Schuste , P.E. Copy
Judy Garrett
From : Danny Smith
Subject Notice of Violation and Loss of Deemed
Permitted Status
Mr. C.W. Gelder
SR 1391
Wake County
Please find attached a letter for Preston Howard's signature
concerning the subject facility. This facility was previously
designated as a Concentrated Animal Feed Operation, and has been
registered as required by 15A NCAC 2H. 0217.
Danny Smith of this office observed wastewater being
discharged from this facility through a man-made conveyance (a
trench which was dug by a back -hoe). Also, the illegally
discharged wastewater was observed entering into an unnamed
tributary of Middle Creek (Class C - NSW).
To date the RRO staff have not been able to contact Mr. C. W.
Gelder. A Mr. Clyde Marsh, a business associate of Mr. Gelder, has
eliminated the discharge on behalf of Mr. Gelder and has assisted
this office with the investigation. In order to insure Mr. Gelder
is expeditiously informed of this Notice of Violation, I recommend
Copying Mr. Marsh on this letter.
If you have any questions please call Danny Smith_ or Judy
Garrett.
/ds

I
r
Inspection Form for Animal Operations
1.,Inspection Date: March 10, 1995
2. Regional Office: RRO
3. Name of Owner of Property:
current address: Mr. C.W. Gelder
2853 SW Lakemont Place
Palm City, Florida 34990
4. Name of Operator: (Former Operator)
Mrs. Betty Carroll
6790 Kennebec Road
Willow Springs, NC 27592
Note: As per Mrs. Carroll, this facility is no longer in
operation since approx. November 1994
(note: facility was not closed out properly)
5. Description of Facility Location:
From junction of Optimist Farm Rd (SR 1390) and Bells
Lake Rd ( SR 1386 ) turn left on to SR 1386 go 0.3 road miles and
turn right on Mann's Loop Rd (SR 1391) and go 0.1 road miles, turn
left down dirt path, the facility is located at end of road
6. Date facility began operation: unknown
7. Date of last inspection: October 1, 1992
8. Has Facility registered with DEM: yes, December 12, 1993
9. Does facility have an approved animal waste plan: NO
note: waste utilization plan is now required due to attached
NOV, and/or a facility close out plan
10. Has facility received a CAFO Designation: yes,
Issued date: ,Tune 21, 1991
note: Mrs. Betty Carroll, the operator, received the
designation correspondence
11. Operation type: swine
12. Number of animals: average number = 925 as per registration
data
the facility does not contain hogs and is currently not being
operated
13. Length of confinement: facility is designed to house hogs
year round

Mr. Gelder
Page -2-
14. Are crops or pasture sustained in normal growing season over
any portion of the facility.
yes
15.. Types of Waste Management: containment buildings, solids
collectors, pipes and associated apertures, and one lagoon. (did
not observe any spray or land application equipment during
inspection)
16. Description of other animal operation in immediate vicinity:
I am not aware of any near by facilities.
17. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells etc.:
200 yards or greater
18. Groundwater depth: unknown
19. Proximity of facility to surface waters: approximately 50 ft.
20. Was an Animal Waste Discharge occurring during the inspection.:
yes, attached are photographs. The remaining photos will
accompany a forthcoming Enforcement Action pending RRO's
receipt
21. Are Pol.
Yes, a
order to "drain some of the water out of the lagoon". This man--
made conveyance was initiated during November 1994. The above
information was provided to me by Mr. Clyde Marsh. Mr. Marsh'A&--.

Gelder
Page -3-
routinely works with/for Mr. Gelder and has been the RRO's contact
person thus far.
It is important to understand that during the winter Mr.
Gelder's residence is in Florida and during the time of the
investigation he was .on vacation traveling in a Winabago in Arizona
(as per Mr. Clyde Marsh). Due to Mr. Gelder not being readily
available, Mr. Marsh repaired the breach in the lagoon. (I have
currently not talked with Mr. Gelder)
During the inspection tilie lagoon was discharging wastewater at
rate of approximately 4 gal/minute to an Unnamed Tributary to
Middle Creek (Class C NSW). This is a deliberate man-made
conveyance.
Note: I saw this discharge, and the trench that was clearly made by
a back --hoe, I photographed the discharge, the trench, and the
wastewater reaching surface waters. Also, Mr. Marsh admitted that
the trench was placed in the lagoon berm in order to drain the
lagoon (during a March 10, 1995 telephone conversation). Nutrient
samples were collected by Wake's Health Department. However,
neither water samples or parametric stream data was collected by
RRO staff (I determined that this data was not necessary for
regulatory purposes). Please call Danny Smith if you. have any
questions....
22. Was the subject discharge caused by a 25yr/24 hr storm event:
The discharge was not caused by a 25yr/24hr storm event- it
was man-made.
Assessment Factors (1-12)
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting
from the violation:
Mr. C.W. Gelder owns a hog facility in Wake County on SR 1391, 0.3
road miles south junction SR 1385.
Discharges of wastewater have occurred from this facility as noted
in the April 1, 1991, inspection (which resulted in this facility
receiving a CAFO Designation) and during the subject inspection
(March 10, 1995). During the March 10, 1995, inspection, due to a
man-made conveyance, wastewater containing nutrients and pathogens,
were discharged in undetermined amounts to the waters of the State
(Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek - Class C NSW).

Gelder
Page -4-
2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
During a telephone conversation on March 10, 1995, Mr. Clyde Marsh
explained that the subject trench was initially placed in the
lagoon berm during November 1994 in order to the reduce level of
water in the lagoon.
This allowed wastewater, solids that have accumulated in the
lagoon, and stormwater to be discharged in undetermined amounts to
the waters of the state (a Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek).
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or
on air quality:
The effect on water quality as a result of past discharges
includes excessive additions of nutrients, particularly through
nitrogen loading, and the increased potential of toxic effects from
ammonia. However, due to the few compliance inspection data
points, it is unclear how frequent or common such discharges were.
It is the Raleigh Regional Office's belief that the occurrences of
illegal discharges were in fact more frequent than indicated by the
limited number of site inspections.
Also, the impact to water quality is further manifested by the
fact that this watershed is nutrient sensitive.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
Correcting historic nutrient loading, dissolved oxygen demands on
stream biota, contamination. of surface water with fecal coliform
bacteria, and toxic impositions from ammonia is not currently
possible. As a result, the unnamed tributary to Middle Creek
(Class C NSW) and the stream biota therein, have to endure the
increased stress associated with the receipt of poorly treated and
illegally discharged wastewater.
S. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
It is the RRO's belief that this facility's waste management
has been a chronic problem. Effective wastewater treatment and
facility stewardship is a responsibility of every animal facility.
The man-made conveyance which emptied the contents of this
facility's lagoon definitively indicates that Mr. Gelder, has
incurred very little overhead cost regarding equipment and labor
necessary for a waste management program (which Mr. Gelder's
competitors endured as normal operation costs).

Gelder
Page --5-
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally:
Yes, this discharge was intentional. Mr. Gelder's business
associate admitted the trench was dug in the lagoon berm in order
to -lower the level of water in the lagoon.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority:
April 1, 1991. - site inspection - Facility was observed to be
discharging through a pipe to surface waters.
June 21, 1991 - Facility received CAFO Designation
July 23, 1991 Response from Mr. Jerry L. Carroll to CAFO
Designation
December 2, 1992 - Facility was found to be compliant
March 10, 1995 - Facility observed to be discharging through trench
dug by a back -hoe.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Has not been determined at this time.
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e.
Individual vs. large corporation):
Mr. C.W. Gelder.owns this hog facility.
10. Violators degree of cooperation (including efforts to
prevent or restore) or -recalcitrance:
To date I have not talked with Mr. Gelder. However, Mr. Clyde
Marsh (acting for Mr. Gelder) repaired the trench in 'the lagoon
berm on March 10, 1995.
As per Wake County's Health Department: He will also lime and
remove some accumulated solids that impacted the property of an
adjoining neighbor, Mr. Walter Lasater.
11. Mitigating Circumstances:
I have no mitigating comments to offer.....

Gelder
Page -6-
12. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC: unknown
b) Receiving Stream: Middle Creek Class C - NSW
c) SOC/JOC status/negotiations: NA'
d) Copy of MP Screen: NA
e) Copy of Limits Page in Permit: NA
f) Damage: y/n.
Conclusion:1-4
1. Include copy of any Designation letter signed by the Director:
see attached
2. Recommendations Made to Operator: Stop any and all discharges,
repair the lagoon berm --
3. Recommendation for Further DEM Action: NOV and losses of Deemed
Permitted status, RRO will require receipt of subject NOV
response, will likely pursue Enforcement Action, and will
re -inspect.
NOTE: in this attached Loss of Deemed Permitted status letter
the RRO will require a the submission of waste utilization 'plan
and/or a closeout plan.
4. Other Comments: If this inspection report is not clear or you
need more information call Danny Smith at RRO....

'.`".. • -� •`' . i(' �' �'.': mil;_ � � r.y, �t�'�
� r J►t' � ; ,r x1 s 1�left
r 1
. k1
74
`{•', r ../.-l. y``t� �✓ 1 mod'_' _ _ r..,r• •, - ',,`��.� / -
.r'.:—r F,.'Y �i" r •%T i _�!1.i r r �'rtFliY'�-.Y.
`
Y��.- _. � �-o, �r' t-,ias•'t'„r; .'3 �- ;ti ,\ ` "'1 •r -��ay: �i•. r.J.
�� r 1 r i rif+` xJ-. �•wY1 _
ieXs�' i 'r•�,�� : ��r-ram � .r`r„1 � '�.- � -
-.,. - w� .� � . ,� � �ti'.- s . Alt: •`�*_ . -i, wF.4� ..... 5

rr
3950 n % �I ��. 400 Q �G�
4i1 i_' a r x 111) I elm f
10
C 3g49 !� Q
Wme
coo
Lb /
13948 'y- !• " :.' �� ,� �,; i �''.tif Qlees2aE�1 II 11" 4
�J 11 / orre I Cem [ �� •! go . Cem jf' }
L4�
l : % : JJ . I 4Vc• C ' Z •' �' rare
^rC,Qm.l�y'Trailer I I
BM
/�� fig 0. r�: C \ l r �• I � •'�(qY
.✓, l� f I J3«! 1
273 11 \ �lob
3146
o 2, Inks"
`:•� ''� a 1341� 41! ��/� //'�.� �l � �� �•• �
45
Vilia
s kF4-� i y��\\=G _ f .T`•;!YI'9M.i:fr i .r f/ �fj�+
FFg7 r rUO U.aY 9NRrA/Yi„ Mt.
u '7Ql
rLYErrEVlLl.f, iAll,
L
Mapped; 6d�ted, and published by the Geological Survey
byUSGS, USC&GS, and USCEms
* * R•

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
TYPE: Illegal Discharge
COUNTY: Wake - RRO
VIOLATOR: C. W. Gelder
ADDRESS Route 1. Box 126
Norlina, NC 27563
I. CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT FACTORS FOR WATER QUALITY CASES
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of
the State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation:
Mr. C.W. Gelder owns a hog facility in Wake County on SR 1391, 0.3
road miles south junction SR 1386.
Discharges of wastewater have occurred from this facility as noted
in the April 1, 1991, inspection (which resulted in this facility
receiving a CAFO Designation) and during the subject inspection
(March 10, 1995). During the March 10, 1995 inspection, due to a
man-made conveyance, wastewater containing nutrients and pathogens,
were discharged in undetermined amounts to the waters of the State
(Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek - Class C NSW).
The effect on water quality as a result of this discharge includes
excessive additions of nutrients, particularly through nitrogen
loading, and the increased potential of toxic effects from ammonia
to stream biota. In addition, this discharge is also a pathogen
vector to the unnamed tributary to Middle Creek. The impact to the
natural resources of the State is further manifested by the fact
that this watershed is nutrient sensitive.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation:
Mr. Gelder had a trench dug with a back -hoe in the lagoon berm in
order to "drain some of the water out of the lagoon". As per Mr.
Gelder, this man-made conveyance was initiated during mid January
1995.

Assessment Factors
Page -2-
During the March 10, 1995 inspection the lagoon was observed to be
discharging wastewater at rate of approximately 4 gal/minute to an
Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek (Class C NSW). This deliberate
mah7made conveyance allowed wastewater, solids that have
accumulated in the lagoon, and stormwater from the lagoon to be
discharged in undetermined amounts to the waters of the state (an
unnamed tributary to Middle Creek).
It should be noted that as a result of the initial April 1, 1991
inspection, this facility was designated as a Concentrated Animal
Feed Lot (CAFO) for a discharge through a permanently installed
concrete pipe. Though not discharging, this pipe was still in
place during the March 10, 1995 inspection.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality
or on air quality:
The effect on water quality as a result of past discharges
includes excessive additions of nutrients, particularly through
nitrogen loading, and the increased potential of toxic effects from
ammonia. However, due to the few compliance inspection data
points, it is unclear how frequent or common such discharges were.
It is the Raleigh Regional office's belief that the occurrences of
illegal discharges were in fact more frequent than indicated by the
limited number of site inspections.
Also, it should be noted
operation since middle of 1994.
the lagoon was no longer receiving
event water.
that this facility was not in
The animals had been removed and
additional water other than rain
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
Correcting historic nutrient loading, dissolved oxygen demands
on stream biota, contamination of surface water with fecal coliform
bacteria, and toxic impositions from ammonia is not currently
possible. As a result, the unnamed tributary to Middle Creek
(Class C NSW) and the stream biota therein, have to endure the
increased stress associated with the receipt of poorly treated and
illegally discharged wastewater.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
It is the RRO's belief that this facility's waste management
has been a chronic problem. Effective wastewater treatment and
facility stewardship is a responsibility of endured by every
facility.
The man-made conveyance which resulted in the discharge of
wastewater and sludge the from the lagoon definitively indicates

Assessment Factors
Page -3-
that Mr. Gelder initially incurred very little overhead cost
regarding equipment and labor necessary for a waste management
program (which Mr. Gelder's competitors endured as normal operation
costs).
5. Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally:
Yes, this discharge was intentional. Mr. Gelder stated in
both a meeting at the RRO and in a written correspondence to the
RRO (attached) that he intentionally breached the lagoon for the
purpose of lowering the water (drying out the lagoon) in order.to
close out the lagoon.
In addition during the subject site visit Danny Smith saw the cut
in the lagoon berm, observed wastewater and solids from the lagoon
entering to waters of the state, and photographed the violation
(see attached photos).
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing
to comply with programs over which the Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority:
April 1, 1991 - site inspection - Facility was observed to be
discharging through a pipe to surface waters.
June 21, 1991 - Facility received CAFO Designation
July 23, 1991 - Response from Mr. Jerry L. Carroll to CAFO
Designation
December 2, 1992 - Facility was found to be compliant
March 10, 1995 - Facility observed to be discharging through trench
dug by a back -hoe.
April 27, 1995 - Loss of Deemed Permitted Status
May 17, 1995 - Mr. Gelders written response to Raleigh Regional
Office Response
S. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Investigator 8hrs.
Staff Review lhrs.
Reg. WQ Supervisor lhrs.

Assessment Factors
Page -4-
Mileage 40 $16.00
Admin. Costs $100.00
Total Cost $282.16
9. Type of violator and general nature of business:
The violator, Mr. Gelder, is retired from the construction
business and is a non-resident landowner. Mr. Gelder had leased
the subject hog operation to Mr. Lynwood Carroll who notified him
during the middle of 1994 that he was going out of the hog
business.
10. Violators degree of cooperation or recalcitrance:
Generally, Mr. Gelder and his associate Mr. Marsh were very
forthcoming and helpful to regional investigators.
11. Mitigating Circumstances:
-After receiving the Loss of Deemed Permitted Status letter
Mr. Gelder met with Judy Garrett and Danny Smith at the RRO on
May 16, 1995. During this meeting Mr. Gelder explained that
the purpose for backhoe dug hole in the lagoon was to allow
the water from the lagoon to drain in order to dry out the
sludge in the lagoon. However, subsequent rain events further
eroded the trench and allowed solids to be pushed out of the
lagoon.
-Also, Mr. Gelder contention is that he is not a farmer and
was not aware that he was breaking any regulations. He was
simply trying to fix a problem that he recognized.
-Mr. Gelder is currently developing a closeout plan for the
facility.
12. Assessment Factors:
a. IWC: N/A
b. Receiving Stream: Class C NSW
C. SOC/JOC Status: N/A
d. MP Screen: N/A
e. Limits Page: N/A
f. Damage: impacts to water
quality and degradation at
discharge location.
II. Recommendations:
The staff of the RRO recommends that a civil penalty be
assessed for the enclosed violation (see photos). Mr. Gelder
appears to be willing to correct the management problems at his
facility.

it i1 yy5 61:33
07 j;S7 C W GELDER P6GEE b6
I '
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
IN THE MATTER OF
C. W. GEL.DER
I -OR A V 10LATIOIr OF
G.S. 143-215(c)
CONSTRUCTING A CONVEYANCE FOR
WILLMMLY DISCHARGING POLLUTANT
TO WATERS OF THE STATE i
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
File No. CF 95-10
FINDINGS AND DE61SION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CI),'IL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina Gengral Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A. 1, A. Preston
Howard. Jr., P.E., Director of the Uivisibn of Environmental Management (DEM), retake the
followirg:
3
L1�ti:(; S 0E E&C.1
A. Mr. C: W. Gelder owns a hog facility located on State Road 1391. 0.3 road miieN
south of the junction with SR 13 36 in Franklin County. North Carolina.
B . On M:srch 10, 1995. DEM staff served a discharge of wwast.ewa.tcr by a man-made
ditch from the f.-uility's lagoon t an Unnamed Tributer} to !Middle C r=k in the ticusr
Basin.which are Class C NSW atcrx.
C. Mr C. W. Gelder willfully diich ged pollutants to waters of the Statc.
U. The costs to the State of the cnfo cmcnt procedures in this matter totalled $282.16.
Based upon the above 1-indings of Fact. make the following:
H. CQN M I-5i005 OF LAW:
i
A. Mr..C. W. Gelder is a "person" Ithin the meaning of G.S.143-215.6A pursu;+rit to
C
G.S. 143-212(4).
The Unnamed Tributary to Middl Cmck constitutes waters of tic State within the
ntcaning of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
The above -cited discharge contsttmal
Led constructing a conveyance for tic willful
discharge of pollutants from an feeding operation to waters of the State
pursuant to 143-215(e).

III
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
i
r
D. Mr. C. W. Gelder may be asses civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. I43-
215(c). which provides the Con fission the authority to assess fines and penalties not
to exceed five thousand dollars $50W.00) for the first offense for the willful
discharge of pollutants from an imal feeding operation to waters of the State.
E. The State's enforcement costs it this matter may be assessed against Mr. C. W.
Gelder pursuant to G.S. 143-2 5.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282. I (b)(8).
F. The Director. Division of Envir nmenta! Management, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6 (h). has the authority to assess civil penalties in this
matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact I d Conclusions of Law. I make the followitrc:
D ISION:
Accordingly, Mr. C. W. Gelder is herellr assessed a civil penalty of:
S-3 mob for constructing 3 conveyance for the willful discharge of pollutants
from an animal Boding operation to waters of the State.
S - TOTAL CI'VI PENALTY. which is _4,p_ percent of the
maximum pens! authorized by G.S. 143-215(e).
_b. 282.16__._ Enforcement costs.
,
STOTAL A9001_ QUIE
,
t
As required by G.S. 143-215.6 (c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in S,14313-282.1(b). which are. -
The degree and extent of harm to the na ral resources of the State. to the public hea[th. or to
private property resulting from the vial".on
The duration and gravity of the violation
The effect on f7ound or surface water g4antrty or quality or on aii quality:
The cost of rectifying the damage; i
The amount of money caved by noncom Dance:
Whether the violation was committed wi IfW]y or intentionally;
The prior record of the violator in comp ing or failing to comply with prograrns over which
the Environmental Management Commi'sion has regulatory authority; and
The cost to the State of the enforcement raccdures.
,,AAA. Preston How
Division of Envu
Jr.. P.E.. Director
ental Management
_ j .J

i
�e o d Water Conservation District
s
IAN gricultural Services Building
4001p�iye, t� • Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 • [phone]
January 11, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO Judy Garrett,
DEM Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor
From Larry Petrovviick
Natural Resource Conservationist
Subject : December 4, 1995 site visit to determine the status of the
"Waste Management Plan for Waste Utilization and Closure of
the C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment Lagoon"
Enclosed is my January 11, 1996 letter to Mr. C. W. Gelder, Mr. Gelder
asked for a document from me stating that the cleanup was done
properly. Frank Evans and I visited the site on December 4, 1995. 1
circulated a draft of our site visit letter to Peggy Redmond, Wake County
Department of Health Water Quality Specialist for her approval. Also
attached is a copy of Peggy Redmond's January 3, 1996 revision to her
original December 7, 1995 memorandum to you. She FAXed her January
3, 1996 memo to me for our review.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
cc: Danny Smith, Frank Evans, Miriam Gardner, Rick Bailey,
Peggy Redmond, Edwin K. Penney, Rick Rowe
50% Total Recovered Fiber/25% Post -Consumer

Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Agricultural Services Building
1001 Carya Drive, Suite D • Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 • [phone]
Mr. C. W. Gelder January 11, 1996
2853 SW Lakemont
Palm City, Florida 34990
Dear Mr. Gelder,
In mid -November you asked me to visit your abandoned hog lagoon site.
You stated that the lagoon had been cleaned up and that you would like
some documentation saying that the cleanup had been done properly.
As I mentioned to you, I was not able to schedule a visit to the site until
December 4, 1995. Frank Evans, NRCS, and I visited the site as scheduled.
Following is a summary of our findings and other important information.
1. The soil on the lagoon dam near the old breach point had been
recently disturbed. Little vegetation was present at the old breach site.
2. Water from the upper fresh water pond had recently been diverted
into the old lagoon site. This water could overtop the old lagoon site if it is
not controlled. No apparent water control device or spillway was seen on
the old lagoon dam.
3. We are not able to determine if the entire lagoon basin had been
cleaned out properly, since water covered most of the lagoon bottom
during the time of our visit.
4. It appears that sludge solids were applied to field 5. Indications of
grading and chunks of sludge were present on field 5. The land had been
disced at some point. Other indications include a dark soil color that was
formerly AgB2. The plan stated that field 5 was to be used for applying
wastewater only on existing ryegrass and native vegetation.
5. We have not received word from you, your agent or DEM as to the
need to make changes in your plan after our plan presentation meeting
on June 28, 1995.
6. We are not able to determine if the sludge and or wastewater was
applied to the appropriate planned application sites at agronomic rates.
We do not have complete information as to where the sludge is
stockpiled or applied.
7. The approved waste utilization and closure plan indicates that the
duration of waste disposal should take from fourteen to twenty-one
months. You Indicated that the cleanup was completed In mid -
November 1995. We presented the "Waste Management Plan for Waste
Utilization and Closure of the C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment Lagoon" (the
plan) on June 28, 1995, less than five months earlier.
50% Total Recovered Fiber/25% Posr-Consumer

January 11, 1996, Letter from Larry Petrovick--page2
The plan that we presented to you, John Matthews, Danny Matthews,
Danny Smith and Peggy Redmond on June 28, 1995 was the plan that you
agreed to apply.
Hence, Frank Evans and I cannot certify the actual waste utilization and
lagoon closure was implemented according to the "Waste Management
Plan for Waste Utilization and Closure of the C. W. Gelder Waste Treatment
Lagoon".
Sincerely,
Larry Petrovick
Natural Resource Conservationist
cc: Frank Evans, Miriam Goner, Rick Bailey, Peggy Redmond, Edwin K.
Penney, Rick Rowe, Danny Smith, Judy Garrett

j3/1996 10:56 919-250-4443 ENV HEALTH WCDOH PAGE 02
January 3, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO Judy Garrett,
Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor
THROUGH Edwin K. Penny, Wake County Department of Health
Water Quality Section Supervisor
FROM Peggy Redmond, wake County Department of Health
Water Quality Specialist
SUBJECT : Close out of former C.W. Gelder Animal Waste
Treatment Lagoon on Mann's Loop Road; revision to
December 7, 1995, memorandum
The subject facility no longer contains waste sludge in the
lagoon. The adjacent field has been sown in winter fescue and
shows healthy growth. No impacts to the adjacent creek and
wetlands has been observed. The containment houses, collection
piping and feeding units have been removed and the ground
leveled. The former lagoon area has been scraped down to bare
dirt. Any impacts to groundwater were not assessed. The
freshwater pond is still in place. There were no observable
water quality impacts from the former lagoon.
If you have any further questions, please contact zee at
250-1562.
cc: File

January 3, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO Judy Garrett,
Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor
THROUGH Edwin K. Penny, Wake County Department of Health
Water Quality Section Supervisor n
FROM Peggy Redmond, Wake County Department of Health rQ
Water Quality Specialist
SUBJECT Close out of former C.W. Gelder Animal Waste
Treatment Lagoon on Mann's Loop Road; revision to
December 7, 1995, memorandum
The subject facility no longer contains waste sludge in the
lagoon. The adjacent field has been sown in winter fescue and
shows healthy growth. No impacts to the adjacent creek and
wetlands has been observed. The containment houses, collection
piping and feeding units have been removed and the ground
leveled. The former lagoon area has been scraped down to bare
dirt. Any impacts to groundwater were not assessed. The
freshwater pond is still in place. There were no observable
water quality impacts from the former lagoon.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at
25Q-1562.
cc: File

.� r< �,z o re i" e./p"/
Site Requires Lmmediate Artertion
Facility Number:
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Z111f&Z , 1995
Owner: L21,ubbaf rre ]1 Farm Name: .._-- (�:Q / �D �� Aa ✓ nn S
County: .K &
Agent Visiting Site: Z")N P5 7'R 0V 1 C k- Phone:
Operator: ri t..a -K�a Phone: _r'-r 2 — 2- 5 7 2
On Site Representative: -e — _ Phone;
Physical Address: 0 /�/� / .
S r-,`
Mailing Address:
Type of Operation: Swine _ V_ Poultry Cattle
DesiEn Cavaci.ry: Number of Animals on Sire: 4 4n 1200
Latitude: a " Longitude: o
Type of Inspection: Ground , Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot = 25 year 2 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot T 7 incites) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: — Fee: Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' Leeboard under the
Comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was there erosion of the dam?-. Yes or No
Is adequate land available for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additional Comments: 7 C.-V"t iwere�-"(7 k t i4 -&V—
21 e yCvfr a hw eh cvas7`e �r,�, fp „
N0 r 4A w es +_ r n r- n: ,= a -t t o /aloe n ��•� {_ a /� e Al c le
.,/ !N
--X-,", �� /, . -I
i
200'3t10.J WJ�l-� E 7::6 SE. J' -In

. s � 4r I
M
fix
it
rat! yy
1V cr
< I Icn, . w
air
'vim
�Fl
117 top, P
i RE*
act I
I&V
Z-11
1
'cl Dryl
Ok9k SSY9
TAI 7xy - I $ V,C; q
St.
T*C
wt M
kid I
6,o
• CIO'
P.9
Nk
a4t
Q tot
SR',,
Lt.
sr G Ott
FFI irn
to r,
-9,n
1r. Olkk
CCS
Inn
re
. 0 . va
ck
ICA
tm All
OL
IN,

� T��};err `Y� ,555♦♦♦♦{S�r - y{�_ R
A, r ��/`, �L jJ _ , i� .�' r' .� `.Asp �..• F.yI'� _:,,. + y,`{J• ^'� .�y:.'' .
_. 1 . pp . rit''�.�� C ..+�'� - I. IZr . t- '� �I - '1 ` 5 � 1 - . •� ''C-�,, � w �' L
j'r s •� i� 1 1' 7' �[' I-.5• ,ti�.5y �y •r �!��s' ` ,
J � + •J ter[ dl 'R' f n �s ' �`� J{ � ta, �Fr�� �t•� -
,�T.-.:Y 9,St•' �_ 'till
y ,�, . • �" _''£`•�':. 4,; �s• �- f r�V �, rri.. `'�.�, ,�.1 if ��. Y,� ' . ,t„r•�4,1 ; �'�:r- � - -
14
LIM
Nil
3 � I, � fr 1 f I. iyr - � , •• ' L A 4. • � T JR r
1 ti. r r_Fy f •� I ,. �r l` f! - ._ r_-• �li-.J'�jj��' - •.F

WAATCXk7YXPARrNEHr0Ff/EAL rA1
P. a BOX i4w/RALE1lK NCM4TN C4FKX VA
% CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PR ECT NAME
NO.
OF
CON -
TAINERS
CL
REMARKS
SAMPLE Sig atu j
DATE
TIME
'a'
U
SAMPLE IDENTITY
3
wSao
✓dh
�
d
F'• m
R quis/hed by: 1
Date / Tlme
Rec'd for Laboratory by: (sov4w)
DateMme
Remarks r
SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Date
Parameter Analyzed Results
BOD (mg/L)
TSS (mg/L)
Coliform, fec olonies/100ml)
mmonia )
Oz+NO3 (m WL)
N (mg N/L)
COD (m
g/L)
�Ptal (mg P/L)
Fluoride (mg F/L)
pH
Low boiling hydrocarbons
Trihalomethanes
on back
LAB. NUMBER S 75�
Date
-11- _ .I cr 0a •
Arsenic (mg/L)
Barium (mg/L)
Cadmium (mg/L)
Chromium (mg/L)
Lead (mg/L)
Mercury (mg/L)
Selenium (mg1L)
Silver (mg/L)
Pesticides
Herbicides
VOC
0.002
2.0
0.02
0.05
0.003
0.0002
0.005
0.04
on back
on back
on back
Report Submitted:
3002.=--12rM3

y F
WARECOU9V7YVEPAAT,I MT0Fh1FALT#
P. a BOX 11 WMALCOK AORTH GVIOLM VU2"M
�} [� � CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PROJ T NAME jV
0
NO.
r
N
i
m
s
o
,
SAM ERS: ( igna
OF
g
S
COW
d
TAINERS
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE IDENTITY
REMARKS
s
-
.lit.
nquis
Date / Time
Rec'd for Laboratory by: rsiym—)
DateMme
Remarks
I
—lift)
SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Date
Parameter Anabaed Results
BOO (mg/L)
TSS (mgtL)
Conform colonies/100mi)
iN
onia g"N/L)
+NO g NIL}
(mg N/L)
COD (mg/L
osphorus, Total (mg P/L)
Fluoride (mg F/L)
pH
Low boiling hydrocarbons
Trihalomethanes
r !r
�y 5-
y5
on back
LAB. NUMBER �2
Date
Parameter Analyzed Results D.L.
Arsenic (mg/L)
Barium (mg/L)
Cadmium (mg/L)
Chromium (mg/L)
Lead (mg/L)
Mercury (mg/L)
Selenium (mg/L)
Silver (mg/L)
Pesticides
Herbicides
VOC
0.002
2.0
0.02
0.05
0.003
0.0002
0.005
0.04
on back
on back
on back
Report Submitted: e - ?
By:
3002.020 — 12120/93

OCT .2 31996
Pictures HNR R EI H REGIONAL OFFICE
s*krew--th location of the man-made conveyance.
Also, the photos show wastewater and solids from the lagoon
discharging through the trench that was cut with a back -hoe,
1
in"
1IW
r
t
Photograph 3# shows the confluence of the subject wastewater with
the unnamed tributary to Middle Creek (Class - C NSW).

R
Page Two
Mr. A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.F.
May 17, 1995
I am interested in getting a plan to close out the facility and to clean up the
problem.
Yesterday, May 16, 1995, I met with Judy Garrett and Danny Smith in the Regional
Office in Raleigh. I discussed your letter with them and outlined for them the
same things that are enumerated in this letter. I have also met on the farm with
Larry Petrovick who is with the Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
relative to providing me with a plan to clean up the lagoon, and the environmental
problem. As soon as this plan has been completed, a copy will be sent to you for
your approval prior to the time that the work is done.
In the meantime, I wish to advise that the trench in the lagoon has been stopped
up and there is no further seepage coming through the dam and there is no further
discharge from the lagoon. I have constructed diversion ditches around the
lagoon so that no additional run off water will go into the lagoon that will
cause a problem.
In your letter, you want to know when the trench was dug in the lagoon and the
length of time that it was in place. I do not know exactly since I was in
Florida, but it was sometime after the middle of January, 1995 that the trench
was dug in the dam and it was made deeper from time to time over a period of
about six weeks. The trench in the lagoon was stopped up and the discharge was
discontinued immediately on March 10 after notification by Mr. Danny Smith. Lime
was also applied on any areas where any of the discharge had gone upon any
adjacent lands at the direction of Danny Smith.
In every instance I have tried to cooperate in this matter and I wish to advise
that I will continue to do everything possible to aid you in connection with
this.
Very j�trruuly ours,
-1[er- f
C. W. Gelder
Copy to: Ms. Judy Garrett
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Mr. Larry Petrovick
4001-D Carya Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. C. W. Gelder
2853 SW Lakernont Place
Palm City, FL 34990
'V
1�
C)EHNF=1
April 27, 1995
Subject: LOSS OF DEEMED PERNff= STATUS
NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV 95-14
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)
Gelder Hog Facility
Wake County
Dear Mr. Gelder.
Animal Operations in the State have been deemed permitted by the Division of
Environmental Management in accordance with Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual nondischarge permit is not required if certain criteria are
met. A major requirement to be deemed permitted is that there must not be a discharge of
wastewater from the operation to the waters of the State.
On March 10, 1995, Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a site
inspection of the subject facility due to a citizen's complaint. Mr. Smith observed an illegal
discharge of wastewater froin your lagoon flowing at an estimated rate of 4 gallons per minute to
an unnamed tributary of Middle Creek (class C-NSW waters in the Neuse River basin). The cause
of the discharge was a man-made trench which emptied the contents of the lagoon, some
accumulated solids and storm event water from the lagoon. Mr. Smith contacted Mr. Clyde
Marsh, who explained a trench had been dug into the lagoon berm by a backhoe in order to reduce
the water level in the lagoon.
This letter serves as a Notice of Violation and notification that your animal operation has
been found discharging wastewater to the surface waters of the State and is therefore no longer
deemed permitted as a nondischarge facility under 15A NCAC 2H .0217. Therefore the existing
wastewater treatment system serving your animal operation is currently being operated without a
permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

If you wish to be reconsidered for coverage by the deemed permitted provision of the Rule,
you must: I)immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater; 2)make any modifications needed
to ensure there will be no future discharges; 3)send in an approved animal waste management plan
by completing the attached certification form. This form and a copy of your plan must be returned
to:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will collect, store,
treat and land apply your animal waste to the land in an environmentally acceptable manner. To
assist you in the development of this plan and to provide the required certification that the plan is
acceptable, you should contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water
Conservation District, the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, or the North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service. If you choose to close out this facility, you will also be required to
submit a plan explaining how this will be accomplished.
If we have not received the requested certification within 60 days of receipt of this letter or
if there are additional discharges to the surface water, a civil penalty of up to $10,000 may be
assessed and you may be required to apply for an individual non discharge permit from. the
Division. This permit, if issued, will contain monitoring and reporting requirements determined to
be necessary by the Division.
In addition to the receipt of your waste management plan, this office will require a written
response to this Notice of Violation within 30 days of its receipt. Your response should discuss
the elements of your waste management plan (including equipment, availability of land for waste
application) and any repairs made to your facility. Your response must also specifically explain
why the trenberm and was placed in the lagoon berand the length of time it was in place. Please send
this correspondence to the attention of Judy Garrett at the Raleigh Regional Office, 3800 Barrett
Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609.
Please carefully address each of the aforementioned issues in your responses. These and
other violations of North Carolina General Statutes may result in an assessment of civil penalties of
up to $10, 000 per day. If -you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact either Judy Garrett, Water Quality Supervisor for our Raleigh Regional Office at (919) 571-
4700 or Dianne Williams Wilburn of our Central Office staff at [phone], ext. 232.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, J E.
cc: Judy Garrett - RRO
Wake County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wake County Health Department
NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Planning Branch
Mr. Clyde Marsh

•
Ll
----------------------------
SOIL TEST REPORT PHONE. Tsfsl »saess
AGRONOMIC DIVISION, N.C. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
REPORT N!\ 33677. NOTE:03, 12
4300 NEEDY CREEK ROAD Solt pH is law in all samples. I would apply the recamended
�R�73196 \` RALEIGN,N.C.77607.6455 COPIES SENT TO: agricultural lin wflell possible. I would use swine waste to
X COUNTY E]TTmsiam mAECTOA SUpply va sumsud nutriwsts.
TO: GEI.DER, CLARENC.E
RT 1 BOX 176 DR CAMPBEI.L RPT W92I RALEIGH Mark CoMby. Agronam13t
NORLINA NC 27563- LARRY PETROVICH RALEIGH
FARM LOCATION (COUNTY►:
• WARREN SERVING N.G. CITIZENS FOR OVER su YEARS
FIELD INFORMATION
>-w�-1 PPEYKMIS CROP +EIPFi,>.tn LwErr. _A KTEST RESULTS
KIN- 0.6 :3.70- .2 20 8.2 r8L4.%8 08
l a7.+3" 1
3o.a sl 'ar "D
:6 h173 �l IN�x
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP JOR YEAR '• SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP (OR YEAR
CROP TO BE GRq%M UME
", .'0 1"TE
CROP TO BE GRMrw LIM1,0 arILLET, PARL 0.5T�0-17110 0 0 3 Lla
I X
,.' v "'"'FIELD INFORMATION r:r."; __ ,,..,. . - .., _... _ . -. TEST RESULTS'•='2" - - r'::d : _r• - car.
aK� E
PREvrous cROP
.PPueouN>E '"
EFXrr. usT 'ROP P S
.11
roc
3.9
n+'E
70
k
1.2
PN w
5.5" 66+
Ka c.x Mp%
2D 8,2 8,8
MM aw
3 )t
08 173
356
O13
1L"W
0
SUGGESTED TREATMENT
FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR '• i SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR
CROP 10 BE CROMN UME K
UDANCRASS b.sT150-70
K
P'o' 10
1
4 090-11a
Lp
o
E
b I o�
fM
a
—TO
{ SEE ■£ GROwx N
uw
xaTE � �
12�
X,119
P,0, 0
I
Cu 2n ■ Yn SEE
I KOTE
FIELD INFORMATION - "-
"'1' "'' - - TEST AESULTS -
9wYPLE IPREVM]US CROP •pPUFD 1-� EENi-LAsicROP
e01L
QA35.
nisi,
'X■a% w.v cEc
z-,!.,� ..-2
0:$ :06 3.4
as%086
65 :'
ac
1.2
Px
5.5
w Na Ct% Ypt rK, LH Cw
20: ; -52 32.2 25.'1 66 086 134013
7,()
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP (OR YEAR)-' SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR
C 000EGROWN
III.ET, PEARL
LIVE
0.5T'
N P,O, K10
40-1$4 0 070-090
X1P
0
W I 2n i a
0 b
IA.
0
�3
CROPTOOEGA_ Lu,E 1 x
I 1�
P,1,
Ki0
Mp
d
In i
FYi
SEE
' _" FIELD. INFORMATION TEST RESULTS'
S—ftE [MWOOS CROP
APPUFA UIFE
.ERi-uaT CROP SOM1 w%
0.8
wv
.06 3.c4
66
px
I
- I _
.-L0861
1 65 6
34
,. y
013
I,.. a
K
0ri"I`N
SUGGESTED TREATMENT
FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR •' l SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP (OR YEAR '•
CROP To 6E GRONx LWE
UDANGRASS 0.5T
K
60-70
P,O, Ki0
0 30-050
XFF a
0 b
tr
I0
■
Mn sEE cNOP TO KE GeOxN I uNE x
0 12
P,OS K�O
W
d
>r ■ SEF
-I=16 -' FIELD INFORMATION
4 "�
... ....,. ...."........ ..
-. - I.. ._, , F TEST RESULTS '
... „ .. ...,.. -.
SANPLE PPFv101iS CROP
uiO
Cc
}
+8
07Sw9, )
W sl
s5J
Moill
NN,II;
w0-3
-
.34 I. cr0.8
72
5
6K8EPP"
96
079
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR
it
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR
cNOP To aE CNONm
LWE N
P,O, KiD Mq
cu Zn
B MII
SEE I
NOTE
CROPFOaEGROM■
LNXE
N
r ,
KrD Mp
Or
Sn
{
Eln SEE
NOTE
ILLET, PEARL
0.3T 40-180
00-120 060�-080 4
0 0
! I4
3
• ' TEST RESULTS (N.C. tests will not Compare directly to number% obtained by other"methods.� �i
-TREATMENT, Ibsia unless specified
' SW Clm: EeM . MNw.I es.%. a.,. sPrN,Pnon, %pl CEC
MP-%= IF•RNEaW,n % W CEC NO,N a NXrMe N, aytlI,N
LILE_ T r lom.. M a ba=S000 !q-a K,O = PPwb- M = m 1000 •R R
E■O = WNxMArGN_ Ae • AXydOr, RMR't00 aP'
F■,-1= ■Erll�w MJPx .. NN,N a A■1mn N. mp tlm'
N=xq,ogan.M=1E.�1000 W. R. EWe Wprca6m
ORG.Orp� .I-P"•IhErOpM-M^ACNUIh
NM-%. x.Xm,E MMLr, W,n,rt LL'rRL •. _ . w • R,wp{w,ur ■mra
irfl=21rIC Y,ar W.S�P�.a4. °N91YO em'
GW =Copps litivr
P,O, - PnoaOrtMe. M = Ra, IM.R. s. C.. CPPFrr
wn . w.qm pw vPNK,I.. Wur' - .. "'1 Na = Poy.alYM uqF=
s-1: s,uaw 9urP ■lie:
CEC=CM Errh C.p.m.e100a G%.C■I6W,n,%a10EC
5a•{=5 WI SM I„ieX
$ Tesl Level is questionable. See supplemental material.
READ SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL AND BACK OF REPORT FOR FURTHER DETAIL

0
YOUR SOIL TEST REPORT
Each page of your report wig show me lest result
and suggested iredlmenl tar the areas represer fled
by as many as live sail samples. Other printed
material enclosed with the report will Cori
management information that will be hit l in
implementing the suggested boatmen[,
FIELD INFgRMATION !,
Report NumC.r.- The evi number is Ihe•key '
number, at identlying soil test tar it. and sail samples
within the laboratory, Refer to this -,umber ir, any
correspondence Cr anone cakes coxes ring this report.
SarrI Number Thus is the number which you
assigned to the sample. Sample numbers will never
he more than three digits. -
Previous Cmo: This is the crop indicated on your -,
information sheet as having preceded The Crop lot
which you as,ed lor-,rtre antl mmezer treannenr,
suggestions.:- "
Previous Lime. AnelicauanTheses Three blocks
snow the m0ntn, year and rate of time you suppeeo
on the minrmavdn sheet -
TEST RESULTS
The rrst seven otoc&s under rest ,n Ils'czrlain
factors used 'c c!asnty me sc*I arm !Mnrr-rro it ;tm!
hurry much Lu x 5 needed
Sod Class: This block mnicaies ire Class or kind
of sail from which Cato sample as ;ucged to have
been taken. The relative amount or aci0rty, ulfc cai
by pH, that can be tolerated in mineral I21 soils is
Jess than can be tolerated in organic (0RG1 sods _
and is somewhat intermediate in mrneraborganic IM- "
. C) i iLq- Therefore. the sod class will "an con-
siderabte influence on the amount of lime suggesed t. - -
j-
Hl IHumic Matter. c1100 cma?: This is a
measure of [hat Pli of organiC Mal in the Soil
which has decomposed to form com'aoori called
hump and hill adft tt represents nib portion or
-organic matter that is 'Glerrucaily reacavil H mic
matter_is used indirectly for determining herbicide
and time rates.
WN fWeight per Volume. g'cril Pi roots
grow in a volume unit of soil with I respect for the _
unit weight Therefore, all laboratory work is plane on
selected volume measures at soil. Lille. from a
practical slanOpotnr. Can be done to change this
measure, grams per cubic centimeter. nut it is a good
- indicator of Me texture of the sal. Vary sandy soils
may weigh more than 1-50. sift and Clay laams near
1.00 and organics as Iitde as 0.40 gram'.
Greenhouse media may weigh even less than organic
sell rotative Comparison would be •.eater which
weighs 1 g'cmt.
Revised 15;84]
CEC • Cation Exchange Capacityme.7
t00C,ri Clay acid slit tcom the mmeral porbcn and
humus !ram Iha cirri portion Cl a sail exrkoi a
complex of negoli'Je Charges which determine Its "
capacity to hard and txc^amJe postnefy charged
elemems Carted n :i ns. Those found in greatest
guar:.! es are baslc or will react with acids to term
oeut: ai salts. However, of equal importance are those _
lnat can crease ptcblems related to soft acidity.
'Theretore. this maaswe defines the spurs capacity :o _
hold basic cations Such as calcium• magnesium and
poassium as well as hydrogen. aluminum, Iran and
manganese..Tha standard measure is termed.
m 9oauivaeres Imes 1 per t CO cubic Centimeters (emit
'of
Tne CSG o: our Soils may range from a high Cl
-0 or more in c!av arc organic soils to a linty of 2 or
:ass . same sandy suits. A high CEC is desirable
because leaching of tertiizer nutrients is less likely
and•higher reserve quantr[res can be maintained thus
assuring an adequate supply throughput the growing
season. The CEC Is not a fixed value but will vary
tram arse to time as the pH changes and as organic
raker is added or decomposes I
95:'69as•• S_,{L :ion-`r; of CEC)- This value is
:t•.e oorvon at Inv CEC Ina[ Is Opcupiea or Mimi
ceoei onncupally calcium. magnesium and
„otassrum. Sx urn- rnaoaaoese. zinc amp copper are
airs rmowea nut are present in.acn small Cuaat:be.
"i • they are outgo consequence m calculating this value.
Base a=Irst ass these mat mill react with an acid to
produce neutral salts.
:F' The higher the base saturation the higher use
plant nutrient supply and She less acidity present To
ir.:eriwe with hurt growth.
Ac - IAadnvrmep.:00pm•1: This is the quanti-
Ai carbon CT Ina CEC Occupied by adi actors_
mcst1r, hydrogen and 3Tuminum, 7ho unit of measure
is the same as trial used In the I aria is used to
calculate the amount of lime needed. _
H Hvp,g,V. - ign ConCePtraluill pH is
measure. in effect an intlex, of the active a0i in a
sat! at an instant in time. Sail pH values range Irom
arena 2 1n snout a on a scale of 0 to 14. It Is
cant chan[N.O with addilions of lime and
'enirizer. the wealhe, aro Cunurat pri iCe5- Nutrient
uptake by plans as well as doe degree of rotor damage
?rpm acid.. are. in general. related to pH.
The remainder of the test values are related to the
Level of plant nutrients found or other fertility
measures- Those that can be related to clap
peccuaton In a quantitative way are assigned an index
value- Others are expressed as a percent of CEC or
in quantitative terms As delined. The still nutrients
which have been assigned an irdex value can, in
gemeral. be COnsidered low it 25 or li medium if
2&50 and high d greater than 50.
poi t?hpsMwrtL; IndexL This index reflects the
level at P !cone in the soil. Values less than 100 are
at concern in predicting the reed Tor fertilizer
pnnstand us. Values grea:ar than 166 wilt be indicated
as 166.,
'll fPotassium (ndert' This value. like that for P.
is an Index. However, in contrast to P, the index may
exceed 166. Values greater than 100 generally are
of little concern in. gauging the raze of potassium
fertilh_er needed but the total quantity Contributes to
the CEC and ES values.
Cair_ (Calcium-% of CEC(: Calcium is an
essential plant nutrent our because Co1Gum ie the
primary ingradema Of limestone which is used to
control acidly, it will seldom be tort enough in most
sods to cause a deficlencyl Since calcium is usually
present in large quartiets, it occupies a larger
percentage of the CEC than does magnesium and
potassium- Consequen:iy, the Calcium determination
is ussenval in order to estaahsh the CEC as well As
the relationship between calcium and the other
nutrient callons-
MJj—w. neshi kr of CECI: The magnesium
[eye% is expressed as a percentage of the Cl The
amount of magnesium found by Soil test relatre to
the amount of calcium, potassium and the acia
traction of the Cl inhuerites thelactual quentiry of
magnesium needed, Therefore, the passible need
for the inclusion of magnesium in liming materials Or
rn the ipmhzer Is based on this relative Measure -
Mr i IIIW920ese indesl This index is used in
conjllnprOn with pH to etaluale the need for Mn
aeplication on certain crops. The numbers in
parentheses are flue Manganese availabiury indexes
for the first and second crops. Additional informatwn
regarding rates and methods of applicatit?n,may be
included in the'NaW that accompanies your report.
Zn-I ?Zinc Indexl This ndex is used to evaluate
Zr. ham the standpoint of owing suttrciem or toxic,
The levels which indrati sufficiency tar toxKily are
not clear-cut for some crolis. Until these levels ale
determined use information in the 'Notes- that
accompany your report.
CU-1 (Cooper Index$, This index is used to
evaluate Cu from the standpoint of being satkisent or
toxic. Like Zi the levels writh indicate sufficalincy, Or
III are net dear_cut for some crops. Ural these
levels are oeterriuriea use iitforrnahon in the -Notes'
that accompany your report,
8-1 rSullate Sulfur trial This is a relauve
measure of the form of sulfur available to plants. The
test may to done On a Trmiled number OI samples
However• an interpretation of the relative sufficiency
generally requires more inlcrmahon about the soil
than is available to us. Guidelines and suggestions.
are offered in some of the -Notes accompanying
I report.
-t[Si Sail In A number (mho x 10-
7cm) will appear when the soil sample is from
greenhouse. problem fields or other areas where
damage from salt is suspected. A general
interpreaWn will be included wah greenhouse reports.
Other, situations must be evaluated on an individual
basis.
NO.N INiIrale Nmogenmo ani Greenhouse
soils or growing mixtures will get thrs few. The test
valuemilligrams per cubic decimeter tmgrdmi is a
quantitative value based On a volume rattle[ itan a`
weignt of soil. The number would on equivalent to
parts per million (pli it the volume weigh: of the soil
was 1-00 g'Cmr. If our tests are to be Compared Tc
test results or specrlicauans based an actual pi
convert Ine mg'dm' value to pi by dividing by foe
W,V at the soil in question.
NM,N (Ammonium Mrocen, mg Cmik. This lest
will seldom oe performed out. for comparison with
values based on weight. coserve the same
preautions naeo tar Ine ntaaln values-
Na (Sodium. meq100 cm This test will be done
only to prpbtem s+bJalydris or til related to iesearCn-
The value is in the same tents used in the CEC, No
minimum values are or concern in plant nutrition but
high levels can cause Iha, crumb stucture of the soil
to break down arc! may seriously affect plant uptake
of calcium- magiv stem and polassrum-
. SUGGESTED TREATMENT
The mformalmn you supplied 'wnh your samples
Arid the Soil Test reSurts '.were used TO develop the
suggested rates of lime rune hi ;ill These rates"
apply to fre areas from wnx ;^,e samples were taken
am snpato not be Corsiderea for a:ner areas or as
generalized suggestions.----- -'
LIME: Rates suggested ire emer tons par acre
for large areas or in pounds per 1000 sq, 1. for small
areas. A fate of one and ono na!t tons par acre wIjI
appear as't.ST for large, areas and as 0:0M far
small areas.
FEa TILIZERr plant n•,,*,eni needs are _
denSitleree on an ,ndivicual oasis for held craps or
others grown in large areas. The three IN. P 0, and
Ki01 ;hat can goneratty be purchased in mixed
anilaws are printed in ranges such as 0-30, 20-10.
80-100, etc. A mixed fertilizer ltat most nearly fits
the N.P.I 0 ratio suggested. Slraigrit nulnent
materials or any combination or ire two can be used.
The others (Mg. Cu,. Zn. 8 ants Mir) are printed as
r one number or, a nana'u ravage in terms of IbS..'a at
the actual element. More oewilyd information
concerning each crap or :he a iohCal+Ort of each
element can generally be found in the Note indicated
In ;he 'See Note- black,
In greenhouse cul small tun areas and
possible Other situations Le N- P,O; and I
suggestions appoai as pounds el each per 1000 sq.
It. For example- 2M in.:h F,C black means two
pounds K O per 1000 Sit PIP
Suggested treatment for pt:Ints around the name
will appear as a number of pounds of a particular
grade at mixed lenihzer per 1000 so. ft. For example.
10 lbs. 10-10-10 0r equivper t000 so. h. The'Note
included with the report will contain more arailed
intonation.
SOIL TESTING PROVIDED BY
I AGRONOMIC DIVISION

SOIL TEST REPORT PHONE: (Brs) 723-2655
REPORT NO. 33672 AGRONOMIC DIVISION, N.C. DEFT. OF AGRICULTURE
4300 REEDY CREEK ROAD
0- 1/95 RALEIGH. N.C. 27607- 465 COPIES SENT TO:
!! X COUNTY F17ENSION PIA6CTOA _
TO: M.DFR, CLAREACE
RT 1 BOX 126 DR CAMPBELL RPT W921 RALEIGH
NORLINA RC 27563- LARRY PETROVICH RALEIGH
FARM LOCATION (COUNTY): WARREN
FIELD INFORMATION
_ - ^• .I TEST RESULTS ' ^'
s �rc wrEv:ous e•°r
.PPUE°ux[
i-.tisi exaP
Fv;a.
� xr-,�
wY
sax
Ee
Px'
Pa.;; wi.
msi :+4'►-.
rw
- >»a
ew
s+
ss+
xoaN xxr x.
1'""c'
N ..
�.
::n.� ae
•;2cre. z.,-a-
-':
0T9]
xd
rr.
,.a
5°
---3
Mlil 1.0
.34
2.9
T2 =
0.8
6.6
17.:" . fi8
1'.5, 0'8.
96
079
48
"
013
°' .0
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR
"
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR '•
ip KGrrO,.M
uxEF50
r50
xp
w
:.
•
rn
wt
rn°riosE.—
11xE N
P,os
yorqmbs
�90-"i'lo
�20-040
GRASS
D.3D
D
0
0
0
12
FIELD INFORMATION �
;'TEST RESULTS':"--e' - • -=1'a::'t'r. Gsv t' 'u^
sxNPFE exar
aPPUEp L■IEr
rExa-Ease exaP
�
r•Pr
w.v
p:e
nxT
Px
.• wa
r.°�F •-
. MMala,
rr-
�rsEvrolrs
tJ
.
�_.'
(
,
'
71
Z13.
x.
is
/,G1
h°
AINa
5'4*SUGGESTED
5a
�
.
.
8GP%Y�
.5_-4
-�:
TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR
•'
SUGGESTED
TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR •'
CROP TaY GR°MM
IIYF
x P,O, K,O
Yp
w
an
•
Ixr
SEE
xpTE
CHOP TO SE Gr10wr.
tNM
N
P,O,
K,O
rp
m
A
■
xn
SEE
MOTE
NIL-LFT. PEARL.
0.3T
40•-180 �OO—IZO 40-060
0
0
0
0
3
FIELD INFORMATION TEST RESULTS•" " - -
suive.E PxEv■ws e•oP
APrLLp F1ME
PExT. EUTcxoP saL
- xwlc
wY
., ece.
- ws-
Aa
PM
N K4
Cvf .
F14
n+
C—
E+
SH 10'•
"'?'
.Y
�
aws
- _
� ^
.}..:
�
071)
--�I
iylN�-
1.4'
.18:
5'.4r
85,--
0.8
5:T
16 68
8.3' 0°.5
74
071
68
013
.0
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR) "
SUGGESTED
TREATMENT FOA SECOND CROP OR YEAR •'
G10P i0 eE CROwx
WEK,
..0
d
L
■
M
SEE
xOTF
C•D/TO ■F GROWK
PP.
K,O
W
m A
■
Yw
5�
�L1DAN(iRAS.9 10.3TI50-,70
�00-"lo'20 10-0O30
0
0
0
0
l2
..- FIELD INFORMATION
-1-. TEST RESULTS.'.
'
-�„�•c
c.�.w a CxaP .rx.ua. Ep aRaEi
FvEan°i.. usTR
�l
aaFC-
■S�%'
as
►.�L
u—
Ye
a'!I
lf
,�-.m_FawJ
ya pks-+
W;,-^
-
�lznm.
-.
I■r.[w°us
r. i.a
ASS
-L
�P'x
r"
'i1i
Y
—CH-.L7
l
4,3b4 �
_
..i"•
�i p-.:o
"�°
�'i[`C)••
Jwry
}, wx,-w:1
ik
Yr'
.r
n
.-.
T
r•a
P2..iJ
_°n-
fT
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR '• SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR ••
TO ■{Gxgwx
LYE
X
P,OF
K,O
Fr■ w Fn a Ya
SEE Cwr TO ■E •R°wx
al..F M
P,O,
Kra
xp
m G •
.Y
s[[
MOTE
MOi[
FIELD INFORMATION
--� _ - -_ - - - - "_ d-s1E; TEST RESULTS
- -
'.%- car:_' ` •_' - r.'+� -
H..PIE PxEYKRR GNOP
•PPLEY L■.E -EAT. LasT GPOP
■pl
p.a!■
1
HI[Y
t,.. -
wY
....
c
E^. r. _.
-
•a%
..:
� •Zc
4
W
': Pe •.;
'- 1N.
O\:-
i P:
:_F�a..•.014
(hr-.
24
ESI'
1q,w_
YXN•
•ti
r-
a.a PRO.
r}P
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR
"
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROPOR YEAR "
TY
CRO/GROY.M
N
,r yL
SEE
Ow
,.
,O
NpmOY
A:
■
ra s"
.K aE
MTE
' TEST RESULTS (N.C. tes4 Kill not compare du•ctly to numbers abtaEnW bji °ttxr methods.)
_.. �.__. ri.,
•• TREATMENT, IM1■ unless specified
Sa■pea: ■aaa seeRmn %WCEC
Mal. M■prwk, %a1 CEC
MM.rrM■hx,■rpd,0
LYE: T..Prua, Y.een00a.,l K,0. Pa1uh.Y=■wnWoayR za.Lrrc
YQ.W Mksw+ie Aas Acln,x JW.axr
MM.Flaxparraaa ■raa. ...•
' M.N .Anae:pxYw K P,a�
NPr.Or N=xxlm 6W=
010arw•r.Pa a gw[pMn:w Inb.
NFF%. 4aNMlatM., Fe[ rRJ
7w
cr4 a Cap-
■rtl..M
N• ■ sa•MnK mq.•"'1.W. wr.r
PaTpMop1YYY..lMU.,MOWI1E00.W .. q. R 4■1ror aa CYaappprr .•Wm
r:D"e
,.w.yxPwv.em,pwKa.Ppkm Ma.
.
S4. sraw r +ax
CEC.CmE-0-c-p-mplWc'o c %-cak m4%ofcEc
5S4.4aYas.Mbm.
$ Test Level is questionable. See supplemental material.
READ SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL AND BACK OF REPORT FOR FURTHER DETAIL

YOUR SOIL TEST REPORT
Each page of your report will Shaw the test results
and suggested treatment tot the areas represemed
by as many as live soil samples. Other printed
material enclosed with The report will contain
management information that will be helpful in
implementing the suggested treatment.
FIELD INFORMATION
Remit Number.- The report number is the key
number of idamilying soil test results and scii samples
within the laboratory. meter to this number in any
correspondence or phone calls concerning this repon.
Sample Number, This is the number which you
assigned to the sample. Sample numbers wig never
be more than three digits.
Previous Crao: This is the crop indurated an your
information sheet as having preceded the Crop tot
which you aSkeo for lime and fendize/ treatment
suggestions.:
Previous JJme_Apphcatlonn' These three blocks
show the month, year and rare of lime you supplied
on the information sheet,
TEST RESULTS 1
Thiftirst [Pupa hlf1f45 finger lest result, c^n:alit
factors used to classdv the soil and determine 4 and
how much lime is needed,
Soil Class This block indicates the class or hind
of soil from which each sample was judged to have
been Laken. The nelatwe amount at acidity. indicated
by pH. that can be tolerated in mineral (MIN) sods is
less than Can be tolerated in organic (ORG) soils
and is somewhat intermediate in mineral -organic IM-
O} soils. Therefore, the soil Class will exen can.
siderable influence on the amount of Line suggested.
HM- e,HumiC Matter. clN00 cros : This is a
measure at that portion of organic mailer in the soil
which has decomposed la form compounds called
hurnic and lulvic acids- It represents the portion of
ongamc matter that is -chemically reactive-. Humic
matter is used indireWy for determining herbicide
and lime rates.
WfV (Weight per Volume. olcm'Z Plant roots
grew in a volume unit of sod with little respect for the
unit weight. Therefore. all laboratory work is done on
selected volume measures of sod. Little. from a
practical standpoint, can be done to change this
measure. grams per cubic centimeter, out if is a goon
indicator of the texture o1 the sod. Very sandy sdds
may weigh more than 1-50. sill and clay owns near
1.00 and organics as little as 0.40 glom'.
Greenhouse media may weigh even ass than organic
saila. A relative comparison would W wafer which
weighs 1 g;cm'.
Revised ("4)
I
I
I
F
CEC - {Cation_ Exchange Cavacity-mec.I
100cm-1: Clay and sill from the mineral portion and
humus from the organic portion ct a soil exhibits a
complex of negative charges which determine its
capacity to hold and exchange positively charged -
eiememe called canons. Those found in greatest
quantities are basic or will react with acres to farm
neutral Sal However, of equal importance are those
that can create problems related to soil acidity.
Therefore. this measure defines the soil's capaaty 10
hold basic cations such as calcium, magnesium and
potassium as with as hydrogen, aluminum, Lien and
manganese. The standard measure is termed
milfequivalents (meal.) per 100 cubic centimeters (CMJ
Of Sell.
TheCEC at our soils may range from a high a1
=0 or more in clay and organic sills to a low of 2 or
less in same sandy soils- A nigh CEC is desirable
because leaching of fertilizer nutrients is less likely
and hghef reserve quantities can be maintained thus
assuring an adequate supply throughout the growing
season. The CEC is not a fixed value but will vary
from time to time as the pH changes and as organic
matter is added or decdmpasss. '
i i8ase Saturation -ale of CECV This value is
the panren of the CEC that is occupied by nutrient
cations. principally calcium. magnesium and
potassium. Sodium. manganese. tint and copper are
also involved but are present in such small quantities
they are of little consequence m caculatintg thts value.
Base tattoos are those that will react with an acid to
produce neutral sags.
The higher the base saturation the higher the
plant nutrient supply and the less acidity present to
interfere with plant growth.
Ac - !Acidity-meti.000cmi): This is the quanti-
lative portion of the CEC occupied by acidity factors,
mostly hydrogen and aluminum. The unit of measure
is the same as that used in the CEC and is used to
calculate the amount of lime needed.
PH - fHvdroaen - ion Concentrafianh pH is a
measure. in effect an index, at the Wive acidity in a
soil at an instant to time- Sill pH values range trap
around 3 to about 8 on a scale at 0 to 14, It is
constantly changing with additions of rime and
fertilizer. the weather and cultural practices. Nutrient
uptake by plants As well as the degree of root damage
from all are. in generate related to pH.
The remainder of the test values are related to the
level of plant nutrients found Of Other fertility
measures- Those that can be related to crop
production In. a quantitative way are assigned an indent
value. Others are expressed as a percent of CEC or
in quantitative forms as defined. The soil nuirems
which have been assigned an index value cal in
general, he considered low it 25 or less, medium if
26-50 and high it greater than 50.
R-1 IPhasphonm Inanxt, This index reflects the
level at P found in the soil. Values less than 100 are
at concern in predicting the need for fertilizer
phosphorus. Values greater than 166 will be indicated
as 166+.
K-I fPoM55ya] fnrWxl. This value. like that for P.
is an index. However. in Wntrost to P. the index may
exceed 166- Values greater man t00 generally are
of little concern in gauging the rate of potassium
fertilizer needed but the total quantity contributes to
the CEC and SS values-
Ca- (Calcium-, of CECP Calcium is an
essential plant nutrient but. because calcium is the
primary ingredient of limestone which is used to
control acil it will seldom be low enough In most
sells to cause a deficiency. Since calcium is usually
present in large quantities, it occupies a larger
percentage of the CEC Yuan does magnesium and
potassium. Consequently, the calcium detemdnation
is essential in order to establish the CEC as well as
the relationship between calcium and the other
nutrient cations. i
a-% Wacnesium-% of CEC(: The magnesium
level is expressed as a percentage of the CEC. The
amount of magnesium found by sill test relative to
the amount of calcium, potassium and the acid
fraction of the CEC influences the actual quantity of
magnesium needed. Therefore. the possible need
for the intausion of magnesium in liming materials or
m the fertilizer is based on this relative measure.
tiff. fmanganese Ind"', This index is used In
conjunction win pH to evaluate the need for Mn
application an certain crops. The numbers in
parentheses are the Manganese avaifabill indexes
lot the first and second crops. Additional inlomunk).
regarding rates and methods Of application may be
Included in the "Nord- that accompanies your report.
Zn -I'Ll indi This index is used to evaluate
Zn from the standpoint at being sufficient or toxic.
The levels which indicate sufficiency or to:fcdy are
not clearcut for some crops. Ur,:d these levels are
determined use information m the "Notes" that
accompany your report.
CUT (Cooper Indexl: This index is used la
evaluate Cu from the standpoint of being sufficient or
toxic. Like Zn, the levels which indcate sufficency or
toxicity are not dear -tot lot some crops. Until these
Tevefs are determined use information in the -Notes'
that accompany your report.
S-1 iSuilate Sulfur Tria l: This is a relative
measure of the to" of sulfur availade to plants- The
test may be done on a limited number of samples.
However. an interpretation of the relative sufficiency
generally requires more information about the sod
than is available to us. Guidelines and suggestions
are offered in some of the -Notes' accompanying
this report.
SS -I (Snluoln Sift -_h IndeO, A number (mho x to'
'loin} will appear when me soil sample is from
greenhouse. problem fields or other areas where
damage from sail is suspected. A general
finerpretahon will be included with greenhouse reports.
Other sduabons must be evaluated on an indmdual
basis.
Ni (Nitrate Nitrogen. mgc l: Greenhouse
sails or growing mixtures will get this test. The test
value, milligrams oer cubic decimeter (mi is a
quantitative value based on a volume rather than a
weight of soil. The number would be equivalent to
parts per million Ipom) it the volume weight of the Soil
was i,00 gem', It our tests are to be compared to
test results or speaticaaons based on actual ppm.
convert the mg•dmx value to ppm by dividing by The
WX of the soil in question.
NH,N (Ammonium Nitrogen. mg dmi1: This test
will seldom be periormed but. for comparison with
values based an weight. ooserve the same
precaubons noted for Ill nitrate values-
No ISci u:n. meq•100 cm'l: This test -11 be done
only m problem situatons a those related to researtJL
t The value is in trip same terms used in the CEC. No
mirvmum values are of concern in plant nutrition but
high levels can cause the Crumb Saualure of the soil
10 freak down and may seriously affect plant uptake
of talcum. magnesium and potassium.
SUGGESTED TREATMENT
The information you suppUee with your samples
and file sod test results were used 10 develop the
suggested rates 01 time and lerohzer. These rates
apply to the areas from which the samples were taken
and should nor be considered lot other areas Or as
generalized aUggeatioila.
r 17.rF. Rates suggested are either Tons per acre
for large areas or in pounds per i W0 sal. rt. for small
areas. A rate at one and one halt tons per acre will
appear 33 1.5T for false areas and as 070M for
small areas.
Fr Loll IZER- Plant nutrient needs are
considered on an individual basis for field crops or
others grown in large areas. The three IN. P Os and
K,01 trial can generally be purchased in mixed
iendizers are printed in ranges such as 0-30. 20-40.
80-100. etc- A mimed lenflizer That most nearly tits
the N-P,O,K.O ratio suggested. straight nutrient
materials or airy combination of the two Can W used.
The others (Mg- Out, Zn. B and Mnl are printed as
one number or a narrow range in terms of Ibsia of
the actual element. More detailed information
concerning each crop or the apphcal of each
element can generally be found in the Note indicated
in the 'See Note' blork.
In greenhouse culture, small turf areas and
possible other situations the N. Q.O, and Kx0
suggestions appear as pounds of each per 1000 sal.
IT For example- 2M in the K O block means two
pounds K.O oer 1000 sq, h.
Suggested treatment for ptants around the home
will appear as a number of pounds at a particular
grade of mixed fertilizer per 1000 sq. h. For example.
10 lbs. 10.10-10 or egurv. per to= sq. IT The -Noce'
included with the report will comain more detailed
information.
SOIL TESTING PROVIDED By
NCDA AGRONOMIC DIVISION
r-
0

TO:
Gelder, Clarence
_ Rt. 1, Box 12G
Nor Iina_ NC 27563
REPORT NO: unnq-)i COUNTY--waTrurN
COPIES:
WARREN CO. EXT. BIR.
Charlie Tyson
Soil Conservation Service
Larry Petrovich
WASTE ANALYSIS REPORT
PLANT
WASTE
Q
SOLUTION ADVISORY SECTION
nDlmCadeloDepaureMdHgKuRve Agronomic Division
,
, ' SAMPLE INFORMATION s; : = �� _t-1 4o ;'-LABORATORY RESULTS
': f«4 k* t-
SAMPLE
ID
DESCRIPTION
WASTE OM . % N .%
CODE .. �..4. -
I-P % K •,%
s y..
h - % Mp % S % F�PPM MniPM Z+'PPM
} ._�i. .,
L4+.PPY 6PPY
�w'
110-PPM Na ••%
-;e-': - �=
p • %
NI-PPN
rt
Ctl-PPIA
PaPPM
Is
7
6..
wine, Surf SC
3 4.50 2 .86
5:'08 0 '17
582 2.28' O .Z1 8571 4663' 1420'
t117 0:00
." r 0.07
`'A.
-
- = -
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP I lbs/Ton Y
OTHER ELEMENTS
"APPLICATION j,.=
NITROGEN
PIOI
K+O
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
Fe
Mn
Zn L.
B
Mo
Na
CI
Ni
Ctl
Pb
I
:Uuu"
13,55
�D,CAS"1'r.
7.89
48.16
0.84
24.10
9.44
.94
0.28
0.59 0.05
0.00
U.1.9
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP ( bs on I
-.
OTHER ELEMENTS
r^APpLICATK]N NITROGEN PIG.
KIO
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR F. Mn
Zn L�
JO06
B Me
N.
CI
Ni
Ctl
Pb
OICINCORP 12.24 60.20
1.06
30.12
i1.80
3.67 4.94 0.34
0.74
O.UO
0.3b
': ft •-SAMPLE INFORMATION
5 Z. <Fec ZLABORATORY RESULTS r y^;',W--
SAMPLE
IO
DFSCRIPTION
WASTE
CODE
- %
N % P - % K - % - Ca %
Mp }}% S % FrPPM
Stsff-- +'n
Mn�PM
7n-PPM
CIrP�PM
&PPM
-
Mo-pPM
Na • %
Cr • % Ni-PPM
CA-PPM
1�.
PaPPM
- - -
I.�,4..
�.- S `3� � a �
„-s2
�
ate, :.a
7y"e+3•
�
!
I
1 ,
7.}
wine, Surf Scr
_ 3
5::4'3
0 88. 2,16. 0.11' 2.:85
0.47_ 0T38 8945
56
M52.
M.
0.00
1. �
0:04:
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP [ S/ brit
OTHER ELEMENTS
;__­APPl1CJETIDN��
NITROGEN
P'Os KIO
CALCIUM
SULFUR F.
ZCu
Mp
N.
CI
Ni
CO
Po
"FME'
JMAGNESIUM
ROAXASTf
3.20
.72
5.59
22.07 10.
25 U.10B
U
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP I lbs/Ton I
OTHER ELEMENTS
APPLICATION }.
NITROGEN
PIOS KID
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fa
Mn
Zn
Cu
9
Mo
N.
CI
Ni
Ctl
Pb
L• "ma's
1().31
lLIHCORP,
4,9G
33.71 0.90
39.42
3.20
2.59
12.9
0.24
O.la
0.00
0.2'1
:z1= = SAMPLE INFORMATION : _
: ' a x. - =i,Vt'uLABORATORY RESULTS
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
WASTE
OM - %
N %
P %
K
C• %
1119 -,%±r
8 %
FrPPM�
MnfPM
hrPPM
Cu-PPM
a-PPM L%-Mw
Na %
CI %
NFPPM
Cd•PPM
PbPPM
- _
10
CODE
«. +.
x
r
�Y%`
x
��
!!'
--ri
i�.4S-
li
1y
Z S
:Ri�'a'`�
�` trT
•'1'2y
'�•
p.
5� - wine, Liquid
53
���"='
0.01
0.0r.
0:•02
0..01'
O:OIti
0?O1T
9t
c0.4'
17:5'
O. A_
0 32 _i' {�
0�01
NUTRIENTS
AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP s
at . 1
OTHER ELEMENTS
.a _APPLICATION r .
NITROGEN
PIOI
KO
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM SULFUA Fa
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
M.
Na
G
Ni Cd Pb
I
I
j
IJOAT,ION -
0.40
1.43
1.50
0.63
0.G3 0.63 U.03
U.OU
U.00
p.00
0.00
0.63
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP
OTHER
ELEMENTS
--APPLIGXN
NITROGEN
P,O,
KO
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fa
Mn
Zn
Cu B
eea
Na
CI
Ni
Cd Pb
�_,�METHOO �L.c
ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS-
SeiEa -Dry 1Ma1phT Buie _ 2 h• =
F..Il DIY Maerr ISokle • 1"
.N-%.NIUUVen :.-.ti"'.Frppm.6on `• -
NUTRIENT AVAXA9LrTY
�; P-% � Plw�hwui v" Mn•pgn - Ntngrina'•3' '•
NIItrNIIt avd.CNq cnvwr In datartlird MN
[-%-Pwarium fv Zo-.ppm.Zhu i ;�-''_„-
`.-Ca•%-CaleYrn Cn•pgn-CePPK
I00% seew" Mwer var'd idkwlr
,�: ::
`+•I?
n+'.el.e�zariorl nft antl nurire ler.Ths npert„
&pPm-9amn .•�_"
a . S•% . Suthc i '.9b-ppin + Mdybdwlun "
pwAdw a'mb* rtlm.Wn of IluvMlt
ava"ap b w aR trP. ot.p4 wId aaP��+
C�% . ChKaln. - 1 • N4ppm . rtkkal d .
T�Na-% . SadMwn = Cadmlum.�
,Ilan
,�C6ypn .
. - Pt>•Ppm � lead
- .: - -
.,r;+,_n.. •,yr .;_--..
"4m
FORM AD fo Rep. III»2J
Hark Gwenby
AGRONOMIST
M- Ride Ra.tl C.x
P.O. So, 271147. R.I.Ip . N.C. 27011 49191 7334@55
Nutrients available for the first crop are ba:>1'e]
it estimdles of mineralit;Ition rates and prclj+,c:Lad
oss fat" thr-•.awplic.ation mL�Lhod listed.
COnCeilt.rations UL Zilic dnd Otllrr metal:: dre nOt-
XCes;iVP, The waste should not cause producLion or
nvironmental problem; it utiii::ed ticcordiny to
ecommended practices. Monitor nul,rient build-up yiLh
n annual suil test.

•+a y a t•I [ �jr �.,F'Y1 'i. '+.fs.HNr t y' ,', `J. ` _
(,
�.� I, .f t 1 \ �'.R ~ s ��"�l�.,SSi i i4. � 4 �f _.' .. .• � -�, 4 _ y `
�� � '� ty;�f •rti:ir t�' "-� - ' v -r ffrL' ti _lyy�� +'� f•- '�
.y yty,2r`�yY+Lcy� �- � � ♦ �,n}ar,l'ra�;�r ' r � J � � r t. '. :r,!.j.. L • ;t<�i� qi
�y'g�a� �' ?'Arft i.-. r{, JL,rry r t+lr✓ �i� F . - `'••':;, +ia � •A3
M11�� y .n `•v� '�r.F�r'�r.1�a _ t ',f . i r '• ��� -i . ,..1 i"':, . , � :
,,y,'�•t ,.i. II'�
yo
.+ 4
1 !! ♦• A
is 3:f��c��� � `�il � � `� � '�" lr "R� � � (� ? r•- �•�'� f r�:': � r. \ rF
• '.,sty.,;,.,y, mS• all Jr : r S�rfltl`• '� yr, „'. •';7,,•.. 1S �. -•
w ��,'}d. 1,s � t _ ; . !r � , 4 `, . I ! iv � :�` -/ ':ld�•:r r T - i J ..� [ q�
•�N��, C 'rrLi( t t I a 1• t. C+'r s; �, +.-: rrG.. is r.r 4'�i� t •'
l q
��� r`¢hw'r 7� Jn� t- •4 -, �: 't k t �V`.:a. .LtR�. D' .n. 'Sl ;.i:- f �,
r ;{t
tom: 4± � I 7 4j T �. �•-. a�,�;E�r�'z-w'e [ a � .,a t�7r+J' '7� + t' ��
W`J T
R' ;, ; � ti•�� t � . } �: .y,�t41 `+
wig
d [ "T'i r,7 `4 k, j' °ti, a �4'�' �•r F t y' " too.t
. . V4
NAT
'•� r 7r
V
'!7f j•x.�, r".�£H v�1 �:4;- ..t:. cr` ".�r s�� {-
�
x ,
arty ,'n£, ti � r*.ltr, ` t-rt�. . '+• � ��.", , •
)'�i".r I ".iCFF♦♦ 1�'_aj �tfri ti , ,.y. � 'y�,�y;<:
yf,,,,+.'sty„ ,�, }v4-+ d' .� r Y•�yr � r' a�Ccrf ;7. 3 ..r;
4W };_et�� •r.i�..`'y-�i��i� :s_ ;{ I t � 1T_ � y�IYF �' ri� a .,
i V .� µh "'•ter ; L'+t�. _. •`� `� '�,,'•. t r •�,�� � F•.�--�� , r_l-a
,° J � r" r L "` ' f ,•VY ?fie^�;' \s L•, � I?;ti + �: rx'?�
• .?'r•T' j�R. y,.+r ' S, i�ir .a J �`��', tc•�.��' \ j 7 1
`y, r: r r: '7'�I.d ? )�'r� {K, �' �:� r i 'Q� t . � �' h���' •011�� +T �r c �� J � t _t.; � ,,P i� "f�t.,� . t : .
'J .4., y' 4�� ( ?'",r 4 a , ��, n �' ter. . Y;d.. � � V � ` a: "•: : r. �r, • ^t�'�,� r ,I.
4'. 1 ✓!3 v:1 4J4�'l
�":. ••„` fit., ' ! . .r, '4 'fit:. .1, '$
' I rSI:T� ; y t_r. ,,:, y�r`i,'�rq.e Zr ti' � _,a,a.+. ^s �:7 �N .7•• 'rl4f�' � �:•l�:S" 1 .�,
y � t" � JIl#.,g4`r � '��; ''. -1 � �''rjH�''7j y yr, , t•. 1_ S 'I .V• �•��
•';I' -A �. (�• � ti � t wiy £i. r "r t �. � �'s+....r `"L..s T S4b11�� - � � ",1
.7 �iLi ,y�lr,s�e, `�tf• aR f�.tt� ti �;r 4 r rc � ,'. L)� }aF`�'��f•^ rr s ,t*�t. ;�;.' J �•;•t�f I1�r�`�`y�s�a �4-' � r
S ,IRpT�� L A�3 ',• "+ ,t .Y" ,..ev +�'� /jc � �b •• ik•.'+-. r � �• ; ,, I '.•;t �' r,.yY!'�'�i� k� 'R } •�
t, Y Ta i ], �J `.. r ; �4 � •i:•v t i i i 1^ "� y i- v 3': ♦ a .+` _ K
.j��•'s, y • ° :Y . JV f: 1'.I... >•', tfr. a. iL a ayy 'I rtt 4'-Y- t"`
.� T� 1 ,fit 'C �ri y e� - ''�r..l�, ti_9'.,�'tt" ' i�f'.� ��J 7b•3fr'� .. x. ;;Crf :: s. •r4a�£!'`t� _ ... t�'� t