920005_PERMIT FILE_20171231

1
1 State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. B. H Jr.,, Secretary
p E H N Fes.
Jonathan B. Howes, Secreta
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 22, 1995
Mr. Lynwood Carroll
6790 Kennebec Rd.
Willow Springs, NC
i
Subject: Management Deficienc)r Notification
Hog Waste Lagoons
State Road SR 2754
Dear Mr. Carroll:
On August 7, 1995, Kent Penny from the Wake County Department of
Health conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Penny's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. Nor
were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for
the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following management
deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoons have little freeboard, less than 18 inches in some
areas. This problem should receive prompt attention in order to
prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breech.
-Wastewater was leaking from one containment building. This
problem must be permanently corrected.
The following repairs/improvements made in July 1995 were noted:
-A berm on Lagoon #2 had recently been built-up to prevent a
possible overflow.
-An additional storm water diversion ditch was constructed in the
same area.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office will
require a written response to the aforementioned tissues within 30 days
of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address how you
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

----Page 2----
August 22, 1995
Mr. Carroll
plan to correct these problems and submit a schelude (with dates)
stating when these management deficiencies will be corrected.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulation in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of the
State are subject to the assessment of civil penaties of up to
$ 10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated
technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of
certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste
management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection please
call Kent Penny at 250-4357.
z
rely,
Kenneth Schuster. P. E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Wake Co. Dept. of Health
wake Co. Soil and water Conservation District

'L -f 9915 15: 26 FROM DEN WATER DUALITY SECT t O14 TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate A'_-[cn6nn-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT r'
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEkATION SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: S % , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: _
County: _ "V ff 1 \-4--
Integrator. Alf
On Site Representative:
Physical AddresV/Locarion: 4 7 '0
Woad C-ssx.eo eY
Phone.
Ph o e:
'2 ;r
Type of Operation: Swine 1-1 Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: --7-- rSU
DEM Cerdfica on Number: ACE - DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
y
Ladtude: � ��� ' l U Longitude: / V ' 411 ' 4T_0_" Elevation: =_Feet
Circle Yes orc
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: _____fit. %•Inches
Was any seepage observed ftm the la oon(s)? Yes 06)Was any erosion observed? Yes or uo
Is adequate land available fror s y?Ve or No Is the cover crop adequate? N�or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS rninimurn setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?fe�or No
100 Feet from Wells? erg
o
-etc arimal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strcatn?
1-=al waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? �Mor No
'; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
•,irni,a* man-made do -%Ices? Yes o o if Yes. Please Explain:.
►r 5 me F3c:ility maintain adequate waste rawiagemcnt records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray irrigated on spccific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or
Additional Corutnents: 991V S�` d • 1zs fa /�J/��1� A/S f_
G,Arl r/�z e7� Aa-s . /✓D . S o-s -, w 4
I
w
cc, Facility Assessment Unit
--
`/�— Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.
, 4
4!1.
TOTAL P.a2'

PO Initial Survev Q Follow-up Survev
Facility Number 2 Date of Inspection s Od
Time of inspection << 3 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted ❑ Certified El Registered 0 Non -Registered nactive Facility Date Last Operated:
Farm Name. r✓~�!AIA. r"M .......... _" �;� �. County:..................W' ..................
OwnerName: ................. . ................................ .................................................... ................... Phone No:...................... ........
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:..............._...._.......................................... Phone No: .............................
'.laiiing Address: .............
Osite Representative: .................................................._....... Integrator: ............................................................................. ..........
Certified Operator : .............................. ..........................................................Operator Cet �iftcad dumber:.„_....
T ocation of Farm:
E�
'...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................i T
Design Current Design Current Design Current c
mac... �Po 't iC ttl c
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
ut r. Capacity Ponuiadon i—' a e Capacity Population
Layer JEJ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver J ❑ Non -Dairy -
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity...'
Total SSLW .:
Number of Lagoons` JE3Lagoon Area ❑ Lagaon Area I0 5prayfield Area
Holding. Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts .�.
❑Yes C3'�lo
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharce oribinated at lagoon:
` a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -mane? ❑ Yes [.}',To
b. If dischar�, e is observed. did it react Water of the State? ;II' yes, notify DWQI El Yes �_l LNa
c. If discharge is observed. what is the cstimared flow in {,al/tnin"
` ❑Yes ZINo
d. Does dischar,c bypass a la,00n system? (If yes. notiiv DWQ,i
❑ Yes Flo
? Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes '❑�i o
IN= there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'
Waste Collection & Treatment /yes
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 structure _ Structure ;: Structure ' Structure 6
Identifier:
r
~'ewhnarti hriLhesi: 2-6

.. - •--- -- - �I i
emu, `all i � `� 7
Aitude 3 - �' Longitude
3. Waste Last Added (mmlddlyy) Cie
6. Estimate of lagoon surface area (acres)
7. Height of Embankment (feet) "
8. Distance to Blue Line Stream (feet) SUb �(6tib F.
9.. Distance to down gradient well without intervening stream (feet) l pad
10. Distance to WS waters or HQW (miles)
11. Located within 100 year floodplain (YIN) p Yes o
12. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a.Sludge Near Surface
b. Lagoon Liquid Dario, Discolored
Lagoon Liquid Clear �•-•"�• -� "-
13. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly- Built, Trees, Stumps, Erosion Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, etc.
C
.::b.Construction`SpecificatioriUnkriawn'Buf'Dam'Appeai-s in _Goad Con�ition,�:',:'„�',,,�m�.
- ::----w • --
c_ Constructed and Maintained to"Current Standards
V__--
"4 �
❑
14. Outside' Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
C
c. No Drainage Area or Diversion Well Maintained
15. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rack Outcrops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability -
Q/
c. Meets Current MRCS Liner Requirements -.
17. Management to Prevent Overflow ; �_ =-, • •,
a. Liquid Level less than 12 inches from Top of Dike OR Liquid Level less
C
than 18 inches and No Sprayfield crApplication Equipment Available.
b. Liquid Level Greater than 18 inches from Top of Dike with Na Application
C
Equipment and/or Sprayfield Available OR Liquid Level Between 12 and
I8 inches with Application Equipment and Sprayfield Available.- -
c. Liquid Level Greater than 18 inches from Top of Dike.
Application Equipment and Sprayfield Available
18, Was contact made with on -site representative: T
19. Does lagoon follow-up:
= ` y' Yes. p No
Yes
require
p 0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
1 March 5, 1999
Lynwood CaRaleighll 4.7'` stop C'
Lynwood CaRaleighlls Farm L grrp 11
6790 Kennebec Rd
Willow Springs NC 27592
Dear Lynwood CaRaleighll:
kvW,A
4 • •
i�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF )
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5Cb
� /
J
Subject: Removal of Registration
Lynwood CaRaleighlls Farm
Facility Number 92-5
Wake County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 211.0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
PoultLy with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely, l,D
�Y1�GC f� - a,,J
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of .Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Registered p Certified 13 Applied for Permit p Permitted 10 Not Operational IDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: Lyuw.aoA.CarroJIs.HogEarna................................................................ County: Wake RRO
Owner Name: Lyu and ............................... Carrall....................................................... Phone No: 56.7-25.49 .............................................................
Facility Contact: Lyjawvaad..Cartall.........................................Title: o.Tyner................................................... Phone No: 552-25.49 ................................
Mailing Address: b29,©Xeruwbrc.R.aad..........................................................................W.illaxv..S.prittgs.1iC........................................... 27592 .............
Onsite Representative: Lynwo.ad.CarxRll..................................................................... integrator:.....,................,................................................................
Certified Operator: decry.L.................................. .Carroll...................................,.......... Operator Certification Number: 203.61...................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®a �®« Longitude
®®tl ®®f
p Wean to Feeder
❑ ree2er'to FinisH
❑ Farrow to can
❑ Farrow to ee er
® Farrow to Fims
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
/
\7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No `7?25/97 Continued on back
`�

Acility Number: 92_5 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ® Yes p No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Ig Yes © No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):...............1...1............................. 13.......... ..... ............... 3..3............... .............. 15............... ......................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? EJ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? H Yes © No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ® Yes © No
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Gann..(Si1agc.&.G ain.)......................................... Ecacue ...................... ...........................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Cl Yes
p No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
© Yes
p No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
© No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
p No
21.
Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
N No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For
—Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
0 . ..oyja tions.or ciencies-were.note z!ong this visit... on. wY .receive no_ urt er ...
.•:�o'rzes.o..erie�ab�ut:this•vis::•.•.•.•.•.•.•:•.•.•.•.•:•:•.•.•.•........:........•:....•:•.•:
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
�.
Date:

x ❑ ivision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency�y�
Division of Water Quality
0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ ins ec:tion 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
�--�
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered © Certified U Applied for Permit © Pernutted [3 Not Opera Date Last Operated.:
...... ...............................
tfst r �Iarm Name: ........... ?!.r....:......... ............................Cotrty:.............wc>
............................... I.............................. Owner Name: �/ c , [�. V +-: its
�1W....1 �......................:.jj............................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact. L �.................. �urjr ,113 Title........................ .. Phone No:....Q..T. .1 Yp ..............
Mailing Address: .......1�... 71..........1. :.!! R..e r4........f +'................................. ......W.F.. '!......... !r :-c�:.............Ai ...... 2 . � ..
Onsite Representative:.....L..Y1!�Wc�w�J...........!rgG��.S........ .. Integrator :............:.. `................
Certified Operator;....................................................................................................... ... Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =° = " Longitude • ' «
. '
Swene x
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
[I Farrow to Wean:
Design Current
�.
R` Capac'tt Po elation
Y, .. p
Poultr Y
El Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Design. ,Current ` ;; Resign Current '
Capacity Population:- Cattle 'Capacity Population;
❑Dairy
I0 Nan-Dairy
x .,
Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
�.# µ€
Farrow to Finish
-Z
M
Total Design Cattacit'
❑Boars
Total SSLW
Numlaer trf I acions
/ Holding Fonds
h ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area IDSpray Field AreCC
' y
t.
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
S 4si 3--
... .. .. .. .. ..
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [9/No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes allo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Rio
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes (;YNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ('No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EVNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes YN0
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ [ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
& Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes i,SdNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes GY No
7/25/97

[Facility Number:q') — r I
8, Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?Yes ❑ No
d
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �lo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .. ................................. ............ ........................ ................... ................ ........................... -1..... ...............................
Freeboard(ft): ,......V.................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ER"N'o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 05-Ko
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
E1 40
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Cl Yes
U<0
Waste application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(�io
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type........"rhU%'.:t...............................................................................................................................................�....�4................................................
rry
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No)
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[Dfqo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
E(No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
UINo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[;Y&o
21.
Did Rev iewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
EKNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only CkeC' savvy rUz�o".Jr-
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
13,No.violatio'ns-or. deficiencies'weri-h6ted-during this,visiL.You.vvill i&e' ive•no•f4rtlier-:
. • �c4rresphdt�ehce aboi><t this:yisit.• : : � .: � . .: . .:.: � . .: �. , :. .. ; ...
c� et.L ,,)f L4vty Ae t('8v:�k
3 aaNs ClbSd oAj
j )4y61'. S 1 III aG.f� v e
(D w er
w ;il
[`fAS�1rr q�c} I�aSTa IMXNa'e��.J� �i�yn1.
oops.
,►e,,:a �nin/ Qti� CioS i� f �•�ire
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ()" � Date: ) Zr 1 S-AV

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Lynwood Carroll
Carrolls Hog Farm
6790 Kennebec Rd
Willow Springs NC 27592
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Carrolls Hog Farm
Facility ID#: 92-6
Wake County
Dear Mr. Carroll:
EDEHNFZ
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P)., Dire or
Division of Water Quality __
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O, Box 27687.'" ,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 _ 50% recycled/101k post -consumer paper

09/18/98 16:48 FAX [phone]
WARE SOIL & WATE
U 01
i
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Agricultural Services Building
t001 Carya Drive, State D • Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 • [phone]
Fax: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
TO:
DEPTIAGENCY:
DATE:
FAX NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(excluding cover sheet)
FROM:
PHONE NUMBER:
(�ar les A-/ vQ re 7--
'Z,� s-0 -'- ID4;,7
COMMENTS . q
s
CONS�RVAT�O�i
5096 7'oral Recovered Fiher!_'S% Port -Consumer

09/18/98 16;48 FAX [phone] WAKE SOIL & WATE Q02
Animal Feedlot Operation Review
[]1PWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
= M—_
5E­ 7,
10'Routine--0 Complaint 0 Fotlow-uP of DL11Q inspection 0Follow-up oFDS%VC review QOrher
-1
Date of Inspection
ra uher Facility N Time ofn.Inspecdo24 hr. (hh-narn)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
---Farm Status: ffRegistere d p ed
.M<P I i, for Permit (ex-1.25 for I hr 15 tnin)) Spent on ReyiLw
Qrfffied [3peimitted
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
-
Not Operational Date Last Operated . ........... P
.. . ....... I .................. . ..... -------- -
-.n County':..................
Phone Kn: ......... . ............. . .... . .......... . .... .
_-0 . . . .. . . . . ................ ........ ... . ........
-S,95-2 -2_rq9
Facilitv Contact: .... ................... . ......
PhoneNa,
Mailing'Address; eG
. ........................ ...... . . ......................... . ...... . .... . ...................
bia'site'Representative............. . ..... . . . . . .... . ...... ............................
Certified Operator: ................. .. ��rnjj_jQ Wa Operilor Cerill
Location of FnrTq! ✓hot; A] 6 * IJ, I&L" SP 1-1 0 "U -Ile,-4ed -
. ........ . ............... . ....... . ..... . .............. . ...... . . . .......... .................
-- - ------ -
a
L ..
Latitude Longitude
Type d Operation"Current
Design Cu�rcnt
-ity Popubtion
Ca paq;y-­. Population
47
0 Wean to Feeder
D Feedcr to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
QTarrow to Finish
I
0 Other
0 Layer
10 Non. ayer
Total.pesiiii.:Capacity
DesignCurrent-p,
Cattle Capacity Population
FO—D a Ty
_ 70
N n-Daifyj I
7
NF L-gdg-ladi H—n) ­­­­ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lm agn Area 10 Spray Field Area
L Are there any buffers that need maintcriaucelimprovernent? NO
2- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes &Ru
Discharge originaredat: ElLagooft ElSpray Ficid 00ther
a. If di-,zcharze_ is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [I Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is obseived, did it mach Surface Water? (If yes, notify E)WQ1 ❑ Yes 0 No
c. if discharge is observed.. what 5 the estiniared flow in gil/nlin?
d- Does discharge bypas;c a lagoon Sy
stern? (If Yes notify DWQ)❑
Yes TO
3. Is there evidence of Past discharge 'from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 5YK0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of The State other than from a discharge" ❑ Yrni 191N0
5. Does any pan of the wa.qrc management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Eaycz o No
4130/97 maincenance/in-iprovement? Conlinued on back

09/18/98 16:48 FAX [phone] �w _ WAKE SOIL &-WATE
in design?
03
❑ 'o
- 6- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria effect at the time of
Yes
t
7.-;Did the facility fai! to have a certified opecistoi in responsible charge?
❑Yes
pNo
$. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which pled to be properly closed?
gr"Yes
❑ No
and/or Fl2ldliu Pander
_..: 9. Is storage capacity (free us storm storage) less than adequate?
��,,!!
R es
❑ No
ell •:..Freeboard (ft): ' Structure 11 Strv�:ture 2 rructure 3 Structure # Structure 5
Suucture
Jr
109cepage observed from any of the suuctures?
❑ Yes
o
erosion, or any er�erihreats to the integrity of airy of the stitictures observed?
r 'es
^❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelunprovernent?
[d es
Q No
--(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
- - an immediate public health or ettvironmeMal threat, notify DWQ)
13- Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
��•
M-fes
❑ No
_Waste Aanlieatint}
-
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
[9�(4o
'(If in excess of VJW, or runoff enterin; waters of the State, aorifypDWQ)
15. Crop type C" v r n or w 4��.t cf.c pa's P/ r e
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWNED)?
des
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
awes
❑ No
18- Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes M No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [IVKo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? l- Yes ❑ No
21- Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspecuon with on -site representadve? [j Yes [9,90
For Ce titled Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted winch cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? Q Yes 0 No
e►vingsi8tfp''.etfef[ 7a_tttwtution�.'u9i addrfloltale�'as �!, zrt ,sue'}<a'� f "��dx�:;a.�-...tr:� .:? �x.rx Sz.�c,�■�.+�,,,,oc _L+m;„-;'s ,.'r, v. Ax�sa r,� .�.�5�»grw,.rY��. «ri.:c, �,v �r�.ti-L,+�9••.•rn'.�'SF�y,,.3"':.,�x._,.�yr :,h; •:,a . ,,
i- Eror��d e� rra s .�:� G or � o., 1 � h l t./rCpair . S if P/oSed c.•f /Q � h tc f S �� et vy3Gr
Tnere is- h/e polw,, o,. o?-avz+.IScu. x` g 3'er 1,54
0Gla�1,y�hPtranrC.�4en—C+a..
M'/1. J•red ex in.2lw�[►.u..h� /-O-rens �� � fY etrC.911�) er, LG.%7
Cr'I 1 W1TY� h� =v� ,Yt4—jai ILT", /3 AJa,�e Drew i�P AJG A-Aj►YIP. [a. •tip �7
�Y[� �! i-'1DP�� e-Gi �o / •K'yf^� c ro �� �='!'s�—t . r . �� � (.Ih iG.! Ot ^ w � w 4 � hsc� o .y
jo,-� d l�r sit fs- �*20 er 4�rI t( red-crr�. 4a s.
a CJ as:..-r—Plan .
Set »•. 6,e &rr,_ .4 1 o— a,F 3 Aas 61,0 •, 0V4 L,+- 4 C,
Gl Gip H.4 uh- ..
L'Sd — . �ip� w� ,pY;r
Reviewer/Ins ectorName ' -" _ A a ,,
P z-'� _... in .u,_
Reviewer/Impector Signature:
Date; - 9 - ry W91
cc. Diyisiorr of VVamr Quality, JVrater Quality Section, F'aciliiy Assessment Unit 4130/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Lynwood Carroll
Lynwood Carrolls Farm
6790 Kennebec Rd
Willow Springs NC 27592
Dear Lynwood Carroll:
4 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Lynwood Carrolls Farm
Facility Number: 92-5
Wake County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment, and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

1
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

•
E:
Date of Inspection /2
Facility Number q Z Time of Inspection O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
,�` Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Bli egistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and rocessfn
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:......_ .......................... ...... ........... ................ ......................... ....... ........ ......... ...... ............ ......
FarmName:........ .................... 4.!:. 1....s............fcft........................... County:............ �Z ...................................................
Land Owner Name:.....L. c . t^!a .... 6C r a i is Phone No:
Facility Conctact:.......... .D NA..r�? ............ .fr'�15....�......... Tit
le:..........0. n a-r ................. Phone No:.... r. ..`.. bo '..�'...Tt2r
Mailing Address:.........�...:...L.R............kev v e.b ....1..`�?..........................................i<!f:i on,L...... !.::!` ..........N.c.......».... 2.2.?...... rs`Yi�
OnsiteRepresentative:........ L)lrv.i yt°f�:f.................f,.... tte.!`5.................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator: ............. . ............................................................................................. Operator Certification Number:
r
I�V�NIIV II Vl l'fil lil.
...i...................x.l!r.......1 AN....._........ ... .`�:t..............5l..a............ a.5.e......... ............. .....t �..........�.�s....... �:... ro
pp .. `1 .......
�.......l�A.......... a2 t. SJA........inj.i�ow ? f..:�r!'.......................................
Latitude Longitude 44
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Gentral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 4 ❑ Yes E No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ��" [l'es [:]No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray field I�SO��ther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes B• No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 20&0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) es ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 94o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑/Yes (�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require dyes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97 Continued an back

Facility Number:..., — S._�
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes B' !o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
W-No
Structure.5
(l,,agoonsand/or lioldine PpqdW
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Q'Ies
❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Stru re 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Structure
6
S�
.......F.2............ ....... ....... .......... Il........ ....»«. .+......... .......... ...«..... -......
........ ......
........ ...
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
MINo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
0 Yes
a fo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
uKes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
, _,/
fv� Yes
❑ No
Waste UR]icatiao
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
21 o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type 'PSG.' ............................ . �L4�...........................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No N/A
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
IE�r, t//vo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
L�l'No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
l�vo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
B"Yes
E.,1NNo
21.
For
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Facilities 0111y
❑ Yes
L1�No
22.
Catified
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[:]No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments {refer to question °Explain ariy YES 'answers`and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations ;{use additional pages as necessary): , `fi z
714r.Old + z36694001.. howey wdlya'j 4
Z TA r Y. nr ^� ✓ i Sy
0 Z, 3
2 /Gt7 4Cres Gv- °'Pp 1;e J, uw
b
Reviewer/Inspector Name � .. r fir..
✓?t: 4:Z
.,, �; � .� .
7117Ww �U
wr{r,. ,: ' '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: CA
Date:
Q j '
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

':. "GOV6ANOR
74
WAYNE MCDEVITr
�$ECAETANY k.{
-RStr
44
....t M14
..
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALIMLEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
January 16, 1998
Mr. Lynwood Carroll
6790 Kennebec Road
Willow Springs, North Carolina 27592
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 92-5
Carroll Swine Farm
Wake County
Dear Mr. Carroll:
On December 16, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the
subject animal facility. Mr. Alvarez arrived on site at
approximately 11:00 and obtained permission from 'Dane' to
do a site inspection. This inspection is part of the
division's efforts to determine compliance with the State's
animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State. However,
as a result of the inspection, the following deficiencies
were observed:
1) The facility has four lagoons on the farm. The two
transfer pipes from lagoon 3 to lagoon 4 need cleaning.
The transfer pipe farthest from the hog houses was
completely clogged with debris and the one nearest the
house was partially clogged.
2) At the time of the inspection, there was a small amount
of uncontained waste leaking from the left front dump tank
of the hog house next to the first lagoon. Also, a small
amount of wastewater was discharging through the vent fan
at the back of the same house.
The above matters should be addressed to prevent the
possibility of a discharge to waters of the State. Please
respond to this Notice within 30 days of receipt. You
should include in your response the actions that you will
take to address these deficiencies.
Also, several improvements were noted at the time of the
inspection. Trees had been cut from the banks of the first,
third and fourth lagoons and a recent repair that had been
made to the
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 37609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] B
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 509E RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Lynwood Carroll
January 16, 1997
Page Two
transfer pipe between the third and fourth lagoon. The area around
this transfer pipe is the area Mr. Larry Petrovick of the Wake
County Soil and Water Conservation District noted in his August 29,
1997 inspection as having a small pool of polluted water.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation. if you
have any questions regarding this inspection please call Mr.
Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerely
'4eKenneth c u er, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Wake County Health Department
Mr. Larry Petrovick, Wake County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
RRO Files

❑ Cvision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine , O Complaint MTollo+v-up of DNV inspe tion O Follow-ap of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection L
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ClRegistered ❑ Certified © Applied for Permit d Permitted 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated: •...................••••••
Farm Mama L .1 .4d rita #.. 1'R�.!!! County :................ 4..e................................................
Owner Name:....,.L.!�C rN..!! . ! "`............... la rr O......... . Phone No:
FacilityContact: ........ Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ........ ��¢ r M• � L 4.............. ................................................... .................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative:............... NA. .................... . Integrator:....................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number..........................................
Location of Farm:
.,...df................ ..NA.e.iA.,...........-....................................................,......................................................................................................,....................
Latitude Longitude r—�• 0° �"
r Design° Current
Des�gn� ,•.'Current'^Des�gnCurren#
k
Swuye r Ca acit `, Pa u,latton
� P Y�
Poultr-
Ca act- l'opulatronu Cattle Capacity Population _
P
_-P
❑ Wean to Feeder
_
t...,_Y
❑ Layer
�tY
,
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
JE1 Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
" El Farrow to Feeder
❑Others
❑ Farrow to Finish
4 7 '
Total Design,Capacity
❑ Gilts
3„
' 4 ❑Boars
T Total SSLW
.... _
nA
k k. }
Numhe roof LagoonslaHoldmg Ponds'
...
El Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Fea Field Ar
!
3z
`•<�
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
13?1�0
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[]'Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field IKther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
YNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface. Water? (If ycs• notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
I(No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaYmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
FiKes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
6eYes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than'from a discharge?
❑ Yes
[R<o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
es
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Lt!1�No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
L14 No
7/25197
Continued on back

Facility Number: — S
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
[1To
Structures (Lagoons.11oldine_Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
������� //''
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
El Yes
[7No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .............. �..... .......... �+'..........................................................................................
..................................................... .......................
tr rr Ir 0 �
Freeboard (lt) ............ L�i .......:....................L ....,..,.......... .... ..... 1... .................. t,,.,..................
....................................
to, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[ONo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
U(No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
BON" o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
5 Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
12<0
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type............................................................................................... ............. ................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0' .o.violations-or deficiencies were noted during this".visit. :You will recei*e-no,further• : .
:: - correspondence ahaut this'.visit;- : I :: '. � : • :.:.. � , . � :.. • .:::..: . :.:: ,. , : . • : . .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2'ONo
❑ Yes [TNo
❑ Yes 09"lo
GKes ❑ No
l'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
I-ayaonJ F 2, #3 have otj ly 12 " a-( Aeeb60,j &d- are
hydf, lr; eot(ry cDNN#,f d fu Z4to*v *4 al S.o' eeee awrdt Apt
000 NRts req%t-reAe*1ts, fAt free beard may NCI tv ;mete-,sQ e e-
41 14ry#-r 'trgovs 'ter r;Ae r,/Dr, rrrnirpwy SOW w,ty 5-YS4,4 M VV
Neel to b! ;rotor porK� d :Nto 14 yoo.y doS;)FN.
f fees
r<<rdJy
ew* - oN
h P a a Vs N,6 1,
3, .S
— Tecejf
reAq;r
yb -yo'rgNr/er
r11p4 hefwreeti
lapooj 3d 9&-J�7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name,, D.
s . "
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /2A k;-

t
Facility Number: Date of Inspection I ) 7-j 1
9t ek ct Irs %AIJ p r -e. y-e cer
eo wer.e-d
stfl ec
-sc, k4 rlp 60,4 r4 p
02-
AAcdLv A) 40 Le
�- ttl�•(PA
;sj a r-
vecy MiAlof �Ca♦r S)
03
r,roded e4qq ove)s
/19.y GOA#j
tee k
-oy;je#vee V f- WA .0 r by
trtek,
M a - OVO C 1e4 4 ) �ov A h b 4J(&-
sr2 0
j reA tb eAee-k &de Od 10*kt grIJA
/.190.0 CDMVIIt
;O'V.
14t. Calte Il Aj*+ opi s,+P— w�em :77 4-0,
e'sirvall
Mr. Cam r * I I 'r' -SO
Iddr
by 'e*Plt
m Ay SF) /Air.
a j
7/25/97

sz
r'
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Agricultural Services Building
WO Carya Drive, Suite D • Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 • [phone]
January 28, 1998
JAN 3 0 1998
Mr. Charles Alvarez
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
3 800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Alvarez,
Following is a report of :the ,status.of the Lynwood Carroll ,Hog Farm_,
(Facility Number.9275). 1
Pete Crawford C. E. with NRCS has completed the calculations using the
actual lagoon depth figures that we measured on January 9, 1998. Mr.
Crawford determined that the option that Mr. Carroll selected is not a viable
option for compliance with the .0200. Essentially, that option was to reduce
animal numbers down to a 60 sow farrow to finish operation, utilize only
Lagoon # 1 and cease using the other three lagoons. The actual volume in
Lagoon # 1 needed to meet NRCS Standards and Specifications, was not
adequate.
I spoke to Mr. Carroll on January 15, 1998 regarding our findings.
According to Mr. Carroll, the sow numbers have reduced to 60. Mr. Carroll
has been reducing the,number of animals in the operation.since November
1997. As the hogs grow to marketable size, they are being sold. Mr.
Carroll'projects that -by. -June 1998, his animal numbers will decrease to
below -250.--.The. month ofMarch -will be, the.last,farrowing period. Those
animals will be there until September 1998. The sows will be gone in May
1998 after the pigs are weaned. From June to September 1998, there will
be 200 top hogs present.
50% Total Recovered Fiber125% Post -Consumer

1 /26/98 Letter from Larry Petrovick page 2
Mr. Carroll has expedited his original plan to sell all the hogs by January 1,
1999. All the hogs will be gone in September 1998. In addition, Mr.
Carroll plans to begin decommissioning the smaller lagoons in the Fall of
1998.
Mr. Carroll is interested in cooperating with you and our staff.
Please write me and explain what the Division of Water Quality will require
between now and the close out of the lagoons.
Sincerely,
wbv�(i�a�
Larry Petrovick
Natural Resource Conservationist
c: Mr. Lynwood Carroll; Mr. Pete Crawford C. E., NRCS; Ms. Angela
Jessup P. E., NRCS

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley �.
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Vick 51 j
fi. r h`
DEkf,r_t,u�'
Please find attached a copy of ap an
ation for special agreement for facility number / — S
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
Ill V@.T- . I1�
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRE FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORAZATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): o a
2. Facility No.: S�
�v�_ —
3. Facility Name:Ulz W �_u41_C-c ��a �� a—r►�, _
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
5. Mailing Address: (o `7 9 0 K &—, N 4Le e, C.
_C . City- LJ 1 1 0 1-di X!:..- Ga State: _ Zip: _ - 7 5 Z
Telephone No.: (2 / ) a- - s q 9 _
6_ County where facility is located: r�
l
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): Lu f �✓ P� i[./ta- U r' Sl-
8. Application Date: A_ 1.9 q S(_
I1. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
r .
FORM SPAG V99 S "{`� Pa e 1 of 4
J'

''. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
»caste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary), This summary must
include;
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
• B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
/V M".a L' � ""4� OX Lt' S o /. 0
. w FORM SPAG 1/98 �� ����" �"°�`— �� "Wage 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to impleme"m a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Qcil s
Lv ,:L-
0
Applic,
1, /m,. ��c4Z W 0 a I Cx Y Yy 11 , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all re!guircd pans of ibis application. arc rjoi compjeted a
EMC.
cti r Ir
Print NarAe of Owner
Jir-11atuic u1 vwuGj
Date _ A — ( 9 - 1W
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

Required „Items:
Oise I on final and two 2 copies of the completed and a ro riatel v execu ed
application dorm, along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE[ENFORCENIENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4

V41 4 a/ A, wow iv. -j
•1
W hike Soil and Water Con;nservation D, btriet
' Agricultural Services Building
WO Carya DrW6, Suite D, i. Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 • [phone]
Notes from Larry Peftovick (LMP); Natural Resource Conservationist;
regarding the Animal Waste Manigd&iint Plan foie the Lynwood Carroll
Hog Farm Facility Number 92-5: The operation is iegistered for 150 Sow
equivalents (FaiTow to Finish) approximatley 2000 animals.
2/108 LMP ' Received a registered litter template from Division of
Water Quality (DWQ), in 'regards to not having a Ceitifiid Waste
Management Plan for the Lynwood C6rroll'�6peration Lynwood Carroll
contacted me to make me aware of the situation. Following is information
regarding my assistance to Mr. Lynwood Carroll and Mr. Jerry Carroll. Z
have not heard arty directions from Charles .Alvarez regarding how to.
proceed in this situation under the current circumstances.
1/29199 LMP Wrote a status report to, Mr. Charles Alvarez with DWQ
about the status of Lynwood Cariroll's Hog Operation (Nutribar 92.5). Pete
Crawford C. E. with NRCS determined that due to a6t4ii iagoon-depth
measurements, Lagoon # 1 could not be certified to bundle'ihe' intended 60
sow, farrow to finish operation, without spending a lot'of nmoney to bring
the lagoon up to MRCS Standards and Specifications. I asked for
T'
instructions from Mr. Charles Alvarei about' h6*,td' pi oceed at this point.
1116/99 LMP Charles Alvarez wrote a letter dated January 16, 1909
for the following reasons: regardinga Notice
y
.of ,5 .
l )Transfer pipes were cl gged. 2 A me11 amount of waste was leaking
from, a vent fan and a dump tank:, AlIvirei noted that severai
improvements had bd&Om- de in the operation 'since hi" last inspection: ,
trees were removed from the banks of lagoons 1, 3, and 4; it repair was
made to i tiI' sfer pipe between lagoon 3 and 4.
1/15/98 LMPSpoke with Mr. Lynwood Carroll regarding ow finding's.
I♦1
Again he said hi is going out of business. The sow numbers have been
reduced to 60 from the originally registered 150 sows. He has been
Ift rotal Rrcowrrd Fgk*lS% PoraConfamr

Notes about the Lynwood Carroll Hog Operation No. 92-5 page 2
reducing his numbers since November 1997. As the pigs become
marketable they are being sold. Lynwood projects that by June 1998, the
numbers will reduce to below 250. The month of March will be the last
farrowing period. Those animals will be there till September 1998. The
sows will be gone in May 1998, after the pigs are weaned. From June to
September 1998, there will be 200 top hogs present. Mr. Carroll has
expedited his original plan to sell all the hogs by January 1, 1999. All the
hogs will be gone in September 1998. In addition, Mr. Carroll plans to
begin decommissioning the smaller lagoons by the Fall of 1998. Mr.
Carroll is interested in cooperating with the DWQ and our staff.
1/14/98 LMP Wrote Mr. Lynwood Carroll a letter about the three possible
alternatives that may be available to him in regard to the .0200
requirements. This information was authored chiefly by Pete Crawford C.
E. with NRCS on 12/15/97. Also mentioned the fact that the lagoons should
have 19 inches of freeboard maintained.
1/09/98 LMP Pete Crawford and I went to Lynwood Carroll's lagoons.
Mr. Carroll provided two men to assist us. One of Mr. Carroll's men
measured the depths, sludge depths and freeboard of each lagoon. Pete will
use these figures in the actual calculations.
12/22/97 LMP Called Mr. Lynwood Carroll about 10:20 am. I asked him
which option (that Pete Crawford worked up) would be his choice. He told
me he is still thinking about the options. He said he may get out of the hog
business in a year or two. He may get out of farming in two or three years.
I told him I have to know which, option will work best for him since I will
have to report the info to our folks. I told him to call me by the end of today
and let me know. I gave him my phone number, and told him to just relay
to me the option: 1, 2, or 3.
f
Lynwood told me the DWQ inspector was suppose to meet with him a few
days ago. But the inspector did not show up on time. Lynwood also said

Notes about the Lynwood Carroll Hog Operation No.92-5 page 3
that he had been clearing trees off the dams. He said he wasn't interested in
doing a lot of work and spending a lot of money since he would be getting
out of business in a few years. He said he may be interested in repairing the
eroding dam on lagoon #1, but he wasn't aware of the problems there.
12/22/97 LIMP 3:50 pm. Lynwood Carroll' called me back. He agreed to
go with Pete Crawford's Option #2. 1 tried to call Pete to let him know
about the option that Lynwood selected.
.12/15/97 LMP Pete Crawford wrote a letter to me offering several
alternatives for the L. Carroll Hog Operation. I FAXed the info to his son
Jerry Carroll, since Lynwood wasn't around. I in turn offered them to Mr.
Carroll and asked him to let me know by 12/20/97 which option he wanted
to pursue.
9/97 LMP Did operational review for 92-5.
9/04/97 LMP Received approval from Area 2 NRCS Office to provide
Lynwood Carroll with MRCS Engineering Assistance. Was subsequently
assisted by Angela Jessup P. E. and Pete Crawford C. E.
8/25/97 LMP Applied for Engineering Assistance from the Area 2 MRCS
Office.
6/18/97 LMP Asked Mr. Carroll to provide length, width, surface area,
constructed depth, and avg. sludge depth figures to me for all four lagoons.
I also asked that he indicate on aerial photos where he has been applying the
waste. He provided the info to me by July 2, 1997 as I requested.
12/5/96 LMP Reported to DEHNR, Soil and Water that Lynwood Carroll
may need Engineering assistance in order to certify a waste management
plan and structures for the Carroll Hog Farm (Facility Number 92-05). This
operation is not yet certified.
r' li
. r
�i

n
Notes about the Lynwood Carroll Hog Operation No. 92-5 page 4
8114/96 LMP The Wake SWCD Board of Supervisors approve Lynwood
Carroll's request for assistance to obtain an Approved Animal Waste
Management Plan.
8/9/96 LMP Lynwood Carroll signed up with the District to obtain an
Approved Animal Waste Management Plan from us.
6196 LMP Spoke with Jerry Carroll about the need to get a Waste Plan by
12/31 /97.
8/28/95 LMP Received a copy of a Management Deficiency from the NC
DEHNR Division of Environmental Management, written on 8/22/95 by
Ken Schuster P. E., about a 8/7/95 inspection by Kent Penney, Wake
County Health Dept.,at the Hog Farm on SR 2754 (Facility Number 92-5).
No wastewater was discharging into the surface waters of the State.
However, lagoon waste levels were had less than 18 inches of freeboard,
and averaged about one foot; waste water had been leaking out of the
building on northwest corner hog building. Repairs were made in July 1995
included; clay was added on top of the NW eornbi• of dam on Lagoon #2 to
prevent an overflow; an additional storm water diversion ditch was
constructed in the same area.
7/19/95 LMP Did a Site Visitation per the mandate from the State. Four
lagoons are present. Flush water is recycled. Mr. Carroll has up to 1900
animal on the site. The longest lagoon (the one on the northwest side of the
operation), had .3 feet of freeboard, between the waste level and the top of
the dam. The area is located on the northwest side of the lagoon. Some old
' evidence of overtopping is also present in the area.
14,

f
01/09/199B 18:27
9192501058
WAKE SWCD/USDA MRCS
TO:
PAGE 01
2. -5--
Wake Sail and Water Conservation District
Agricultural Services Building
1001 Carya Drive, Suite D • Raleigh, North Carolina27610 • [phone]
Fax: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEEN`
DEPT/AGENCY:
DATE:
FAX NUMBER:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(excluding cover sheet)
FROM:
PHONE NUMBER:
COMMENTS;
r% S kj V4 re --t-
� wQ
7 r Ll 7/-p
op j, bwel r o�-
4C__ plf h -. eey-x a ene-4 to "�"
-=-} lNSIJRE
-ro�oRriow
-rH�sous�H
$0% Toral Rerovrnd F[be.I25% Pail-Coruumar

s
01/09/1998 18:27
9192501058 WAKE SWCD/USDA NRCS PAGE 02
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Agricultural Services Building
$001 Carya Drive, Suite D • Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 • [phone]
January 9, 1998
Mr. Charles Alvarez
NC Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Alvarez,
Following is a report of the status of the Lynwood Carroll Hog Farm
(Facility Number 92-5).
This morning Pete Crawford P. E. with the Natural Resources Conservation
Service and i went to the Carroll farm to continue to do surveying work,
including measurements of waste water levels, sludge depths, etc. in order
to move toward certification of the animal waste management system. Mr.
Carroll provided us with two men to measure waste water and sludge
depths.
Mr. Carroll is planning on getting out of the hog business by the first of the
year (1999).' Right now he is gradually selling the hogs off, as they become
marketable. Between now and 1/l/99 the hog population will decrease until
all the hogs are gone. Mr. Carroll intends to close out lagoons #2, #3 and
#4 in the Fall of 1999. It is his hope that lagoon # 1, can be used until all
the hogs are sold. Then, lagoon # 1 will be closed out, sometime after
January 1, 1999.
Pete Crawford is working on calculating the feasibility of using only
lagoon # 1 (to maintain 60 sows, farrow to finish) until all the hogs are sold.
50% Towl Recovered Flber/25% Post-Compmel

01/09/1998 18:27
e
9192501058
WAKE SWCD/USDA NRCS
PAGE 03
Letter from Larry Petrovick 1/9/9 �8
Following are the freeboard levels for:
Lagoon #2 = .7 feet of freeboard
Lagoon #3 1.0 feet of freeboard
page 2
Lagoon 44 = 4.5 feet of freeboard
An intermittent waste leak was observed leaking from the fan unit on the
hog house nearest to lagoon #2.
Although this animal waste management system is not yet certified, Mr.
Carroll is working with us and he wants to do what is required.
Please call me if you have questions.
Sincerely,
Larry Petrovick
Natural Resource Conservationist
c: Lynwood Carroll; Pete Crawford P. E., NRCS;
Angela Jessup P. E., MRCS
I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 31, 1996
Lynwood CaRaleighll
Lynwood CaRaleighlls Farm
6790 Kennebec Rd
Willow Springs NC 27592
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 92-5
Wake County
Dear Mr./Mrs. CaRaleighll:
r,
NOV 4 1996
DEHNR RALEIGH
REGIONAL OFFICE
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .02I7. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's
animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not require registration
or a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is property managed and does not reach the
surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a
waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state
will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below,
you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold
numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff at
[phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: RALEIGH Water Quality Regional Office
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/ 10 post -consumer paper

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review x
�❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
WRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Folloiv-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection Z9
Facility Number 2 -w
:;� �; Tiirte of Inspection G'� 3c� 24 hr. (hh:mrtt)
ram" r ' [ i. T'ULTirne (in fraction ot'hours
Farm Status: ffiregistered ❑ Applied'for-Pertnit (e'x; t ?S for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
ed or lnspection (includes travel and processing)
❑ Certified ❑Permitt
10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:.: ................... ................................................................
Farm Name:....c 11. ? ....� -CI.C� .�1.5':. `� �....:`...................... Cnunty:.....,Lit/l �E'......................................................
Owner..... Name:.......!1..vGi.4Yrol�...�.................... Phone `o: ,. / ............. �........................... S 2 ~ — z- -5
..............
� c G✓ t'Y Phone
5'Contact. ,17L�..t2..'��... ......................... Title: ...... h...................... , ................. ne No:
a -� G 1.........................................
Facility
Nlailing Address ........fl�.. ..v.... <'1 J��G ��• k..7!�.�I�il�.....��� s...��................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative:.......... ...`'�.`.!'.!�./� Integrator:..
//11 5 ...................
'Certified Operator: ................��� � J-Vn jfl Operator Certification Number ........... ...............................
.....................................................................
Location of Farm: --L, % i Alo g 1&11 //fii J M *-e-11 ,,i5 ec 44.
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude • � Longitude •
Type of Operation Design .: Current Design Current
Swine `''':=' ` :'!, ".' Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
El Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
arrow to Finish
70 S.
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
ry J7 Total SSLW
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
E❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Number of Lagoons / Holding Pottds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Fietd Area -
m '
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes .'o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑'''es ❑ No
Discharge originated at: Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ['Other �endo� Z b�, WI nos
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes "I
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water': (If yes, notify DWQ)S�� C,;,yYjYhe ❑ Yes ❑ No -
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galinun'' p , 1 Ilan
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if ye-,, notify DWQ) Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? (E es ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? j�{,eery► %,oJ3. ElYYes ElNo
S. Does any part of the waste manaeement system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require L,d Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
413V/97
Cunrirrtted nit back

„ 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
r
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are -there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
tri,ctures fl,a oons and/or Holdin Nonds
!9. - Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
.....................................................................................................................
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
11 Yes [9/No
❑ Yes [5/No
❑ Yes .L9No
�es
❑ No
Structure 5
Structure 6
.............................................................
Er -Yes
❑ No
[�es
❑ No
©1fes
❑ No
�es
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..............ca it n........ lS.!..r^.r......�. �� u t...2 t�1'wk� ................................................. .
c-16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
—22. Does the facility fail to have .a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
z 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
[:]Yes B<o
❑ Yes ,fit No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes INO
❑ Yes ,fNo
9?Y'e-s ❑ No
❑ Yes 0-<o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No ,
❑ Yes ❑ No
2 �— Ltr+LknOw� I I1ti r!GIDi'�1h�c W J/)ir4lrrc�
Pass1i bt R":C(6'1CA_ r er6PPOIJ ja)vo,rS�2 3 °<�Gta�vt/cbcv,
S D4Q n-c hzurhAor','� �,��✓z c-Ytve•r-slahjj y eSe..jc��e dam S
``j«�}
1 D �- ��c�E't� Lai o c., s � -i�'r► d � •
0V -e —e
13--1�s� �il1 .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspectcr Signature-.— � Date: 9 ` Z % —Y
cc. Division of Wa -r Ouality, Water Oualitv Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qualify
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Lynwood Carroll
Lynwood Carrolls Farm
6790 Kennebec Rd
Willow Springs NC 27592
Dear Mr.
APR
DEHNR RALEIGH
Carroll: REGi4NAL OFFICE
[Dr-=HNF;Z
April 3, 1997
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
-- Lynwood.Carrolls Farm
Facility Number 92--5
Wake County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our, Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.Q. Box 29535. i
�C FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Nf
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

..-19557 15:26 FROM DEN WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
Ri1U P.02/02
Site Requires immediate Agt;n6or.-
Facility No._,
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA77Ol�T SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: S % , 1995
Farm Name/Owner:
Niailin Addres
'A"I-3
County:
Integrator:( _•r-y /
On Site Representative:
Physical .Add.•-ess/Locadon:
Phone:
Phojie:
Type of Operation: Swine P' Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Cerdfica on Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 2� ' /6 Longitude: % y3 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or6
Dees the Anitnal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actua] Freeboard: ��t. 4' /Inches
Was any seepage observed from the I Don(s)? Yes or . as any erosion observed? Yes orb%
Is adequate land available ;Gox�
y?�or No Is the cover crop adequate? �or No
Crop(s) being utilized-._ , �d�%� - _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? for do
1W Feet from Wells? e or No
_ z�iraal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strcam? o No
nirnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Fect of a USGS Map Blue Line'? or No
' animal waste discharged into waters of the state by roan -made ditch, flushing system, or oth,;r
;irni'.ar man-made deNrices? Yes o If ' vs. Please E pJ:iir:.
5 t11c facility waintain adequate waste mattagemcnt records (volumes of ruanure, land appbr-d.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Ye� or
-additional Comments: y_ 1� 4W-S o v Si7`L ��•sriiis f ifJanP� L(!�'S
c ` et d ^v 5, p s / G,(' .6 /cal ` AL u�
W yo d/,S Ci�/�_0- 4 _
f0"I A09��l`c� 44V cmwan 6L�
0,yCi 77 • G
Signatule
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
Al- I.
TOTAL P.O=

if
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` • a
Raleigh Regional Office
rT
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H N F1
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 22, 1995
Mr. Lynwood Carroll
6790 Kennebec Rd.
willow Springs, NC
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Hog Waste Lagoons
State Road SR 2754
Dear Mr. Carroll:
On August 7, 1995, Kent Penny from the Wake County Department of
Health conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Penny's site visit determined that. wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. Nor
were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for
the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed..
However, as a result of the inspection, the following management
deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoons have little freeboard, less. than 18 inches in some
areas. This problem should receive prompt attention in order to
prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breech.
-Wastewater was leaking from one containment building. This
problem must be permanently corrected.'
The following repairs/improvements made in July 1995 were noted:
-A berm on Lagoon #2 had recently been built-up to prevent a
Possible overflow.
-An additional storm water diversion ditch was constructed in the
same area.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
Possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office will
require a written response to the aforementioned issues within 30 days
of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address how you
38W Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r
---Page 2----
August 22, 1995
Mr. Carroll
plan to correct these problems and submit a schelude (with dates)
stating when these management deficiencies will be corrected.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulation in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of the
State are subject to the assessment of civil penaties of up to
$ 10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated
technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of
certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste
management plan you should contact your local Soil and water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection please
call Kent Penny at 250--4367.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Wake Co. Dept. of Health
Wake Co. Soil and Water Conservation District