730010_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Type of Visit: J2ftompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ArrivalTime:1 q, Departure Time: County: � Region:
Farm Name: -T rn QS Fc.1(`M_n T)dPk :Eyre._ Owner Email:
How
Owner Name: j �my `r h �Q C Phone: 33 G — 3[. y — a (0 3 3
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: II'mr)+ h V I h o M0--s Certification Number: I (a T$ 9
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design
.Current
Design Current
Design
Current
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet l'0 1
Capac sty P p.
Cattle
Capacity
Pnp.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
aci Po ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
0
Q
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Lavers
Beef Feeder
Boars
jPullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 17 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes qNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [�] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

` Facili Number: Date of Ins ection: c.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 19
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 - a 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
(] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
P'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
2jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 7] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Zf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination'?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes E[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes 91No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes o
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

1' Facili Number: 9 3 - Date of Inspection: Cf -1
2 Did t ,facility fa�ocalibrate wastep lication equipment as requir d by the per it? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ NA❑ NE
2 s the acility out p lance w perms conditions related t s u ge. If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. oOL O Q
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other. comments.
Use drawings of facility'fo better explain sifuations(iise additional pages as necessary)..";
L ms-f-P unxA . LO Do o v 8 io- 11 = I a-3
w 0 0 570K Lr-S- 17 N - oa
WOW" A-c� — &P"Iq S 15 8 3 1
KAA Ue.� I a /.3 // 1 S' y 6Z t'n.&yr,,,c� I S 9
k_%____..— I LJ—, . —. - ____J I -r— &A V*Nk\b Lj ilin.-I 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �I Y\Q.. �;e r(\aC'd-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9 j 1 ? q/ y1 3
Date: 9 7_� a
21412015

tvisionf Wate't•'R se nur�ce's
Facility Number r?3 DDtvtston of Sotl dnd Water Conservation
9�Otlier Ag �'�
Type of Visit: QkConfpliance
Inspection 0
Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:
outing 0 Complaint
0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: k!9,0 Region: (R O
Farm Name: -Tho t a LaRm s ]ROKv l+ a Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Tj tN\ r7+h J T hn M Lis Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
3(o- I Y 9
13 CA 3 70 0 0 A0 A D 10)(1509 O
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
" Design
Swine Capacity Pop. " WEt{Poultry
es]. gn Current Design Current
Capacity P,op. Cattle Capacity pop.
�#
,j
'
"
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
DairyHeifer
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
a �
1 Design Current'
It P8o P.
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Ciits
-Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
c
Ar
Other
Turke s
Turkey Points
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes �TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
,?' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[Zf No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage pius heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier;
Spiliway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? -
❑ Yes
�XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
�Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[;fl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[7 No
❑ NA
[] NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24 Di the acilit fay it to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit copditions related to sludge? It'yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. V 't+1' I OL G tS
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ,21-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes J"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
;�7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer.to question.#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any..other, comments. :.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
C CL \ -6 � Cr_v4 dr`} 471 (P 0 1: 'r) � - 1 [ Cp0 `7 Cq
5-UAq2. Jl� 4 -- 3, 3 P = S, -_6 G it 7 J 1
-36 - Ito wooce YOY N t,Sq
l - r7 -( 5 LU000167a- 1) 1,35
Ty' m rnY MFf OS & HOOKS c-O fv-r £ D O N O JR eCFCVZF—
AmuriuL Foe noigpgTHANN0 r /j q
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ` rl w\ 'fir(~ {\���� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

* . .
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: J7(�d'`SG(L% Region: _
Farm Name: -rh r nyl a S :Fa c r,n,S P o c k T n C # 2, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: T_�oLO+ hy hn 4�1 CL
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
3 (cap 14 a Yd I T , v I Ll
13 ti 3 T'c) Ad 26.
• 's; *C
�ti .`N
�: 4+5
y
yy.
Wean to Feeder
"Y
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes 21'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes _L317o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes FeNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[3"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
JZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
FTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
P�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
;To
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
T
Application
_Waste
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
I t. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Of No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
[] NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E:rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: f 13-1Date of Inspection.
24. Did the
facility fail to calibrat waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the fac lily o` uut o cco�mp ian e wit Pennitglc�o Id�'n� Alai ed to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ~�21'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes )fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes
Pj"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;El"Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: grl9 7q1 L4 e-),36
Date: L/
L,�v�2 )z zo,
21412015

rype of visit: zzompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
I if
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
t1�'YY1�A elA _X1] Ilk-L
.t:1 Owner Email:
Owner Name:,
r �r�
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Phone:
Region�-
Certified Operator: _3 maw hail ,Q Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
.3(o_ 140U10 9 S, q /(-/ a LC) 13g3 To A C1 a — q��x bfm
Design
Current
Design Current Design C►urrent
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry C►apacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer Dairy Cow
INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Wean to Feeder
I
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
12
D , P.o_ultr. Ca aei P,o Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes_,&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Cohlinued

Facili Number: Q 3 - Date of —Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes _L3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �NoE] ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 110
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? T
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes P�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1EI"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 12rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes L2"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes &No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 21'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes .❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes 15 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ,E o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ,�:f_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes E211CI0
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes —No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes JZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did tt�hgqa(ilityfai to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
p� [[25. Is the faty out of Alp iai ith permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
jZ"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2No
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ '-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #); Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations 'or; any other comments. >"
Use drawings'of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
urn g a l s0 van ► ?- r I S
k0a, CP a�►
-ra-)u
woo q, (0 3 S y 9
�fl f1 N r �Mp M
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit: T Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
'' p p Emergency � Other Q Denied Access
Reason for Visit: Routine � Complaint � Follow-up � Referral 0 Emer enc �
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region
Farm Name:T1)at'`Cy1_S Fri C rnS Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: -' Q ^ Jf r T
V
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Certified Operator: T I rA-} h.►_ T h o m a
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: I't0 ! % i
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry
C•apac�ity�
Pop. C►attle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D , Poultr. '.
Ca aci
P.o P. Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream lmaacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued r+,;

• jFaciliNumber: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes,,[2-,5o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑YesI o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes/ 2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) f
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ANo [] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes ;3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes )2�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes' KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes FNo
Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
[]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No F] NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued
❑ NA [] NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
�Ilm

• Fatilit Number: I Date of Inspection:
24. id the
facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of Impliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ YesXNo 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT') certification? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes F(No
❑ Yes No
5
❑ Yes �No
//No
Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA []NE
❑NA ONE
lg(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
U?fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
woe) q
to R-
U-1 00005.�-
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Rcviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
('C r� M Lk)OM L{ 5 - 536 - 5 T? I I q_5
Ia-3t-/gC1s
d� ao►�
cbV\Q_Q. t4ejaAP
Phone: QV 67 9� G�
Date. L'
2/ /20l

type of visit: 1j t_:ompuance inspection V uperation Review U btructure tvaivation U teenmeal Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ival Time: ; Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: l ho►'►r15-r PDt)& Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ' mQ'� U OrKas
Title:
Regio4a_y_L)_
Phone: t3 3 (n — 50 ~ a 21 a 2
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: r b7931'%`
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
go x bond A)a ' 59 L/
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design C+urrent
C*apacity Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry C►apacity Pop.
La er
rent
Design CRro-Ap
Cattle Capacity .
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dr► F,oultr. Ca acity P,o P.
Layers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
J2-<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZrIKIo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Faci it y Number: - Date of -inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑Yes /"2'i o
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes a'i o
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑Yes ETNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Ye�5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Rl"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � 3, /
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 21"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? C] Yes' N
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes/e' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �10
❑Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes,,En-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes�N ❑ NA [3 NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facifity Number: 11 1 iD Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the �facicilit fail to calibrate waste
application equipment as rel�icLb� �e permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility ut o comp �an� —ce with perrm on iti s related to'sllge?if yes, check [] Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes :�?No
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ;;3'*'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes CZ(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question-.#): Explain any:YES answers and/or any addition al,recommendations onany other comments, h
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations use additional pages as necessa
(o - as - I a d= '5 �� y,a
11
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �� Phone: qr-r% /-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: `I 19 - 13
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Type of Visit: � Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Vis Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timer Departure Time: County: Region:R�
Farm Name: Thn /Yla S Eacrn s Pe r k ?U:aOwner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: 3,3 6 3 /1 v
33 (o - so '-I =T a 9 S a
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: -TdC1 d ©C d ` ?
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title: Phone:
Integrator: R MCA'
Certified Operator: -T1 mp f 111! Dom,, 51 h Q U Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design EMrrentIII,
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Pou111 ltry
Wean to Finish La er
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
C►attle
Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Design C*urrent
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes A No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in)* �
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �yNo
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks).,(
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes V I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? i
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes YfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 91'
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VJ'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
1
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
y J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
',P'Sio
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑ Waste T ansfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking [] Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ) ' -o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes Po
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
.0"No
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes❑
jNoo
NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency'?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES;answers:and/or any additional.recommendations=orauy other comments s,
I '
Use drawings o1 facility.ta better explain situations {use additional pages as necessary) '°".fr° .:: . m. a p : t`., `.
� a Z) W 0 P r y_0
r
-a= 3F .1 1 1 4 -V I I I r7
1V -;zi 1759y v , y
° -3 I�� 1 a 14,d rm
a(`�V 0=3, ? -p 1-1,
110" ho0t�s n e-de-6
1 11 ?/A/ // —
�Q.L_l aIQn1/, —
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewedlnspcetor Signature:
Page 3 of 3
L/ a-1
Phone: 9 /%r / V / C-1 0,-234
Date 0-
21412011

type of visit R Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ��,,``2 Departure Time: %- 3 G County: ��f�' Region:
Farm Name: — 7 �E�'' ; ��H -T,1, 2 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 'Title:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certifieation Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: e 0 4 =14 Longitude: = ° = 1 = 1{
Yc Seka j..,"*'z§, #Sir` .1.if Sa.`'.
;.? = ti,Aie51 n s CUCterit t r iiDQSI^ n ' CUCCent t ,� :� " 4 iDeSl i[t i -`Current e;
SWI,nC" "s, an $ t ai -..i "._ ' } _ �. €`s }As -rtA -., r+
g `€Capactty...Fopulat�ontz n-. 4 W,ct Poultry Capacit Pnpulahon Castle „ " _ •Ca acit 1'o ulatton
"JIL] Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder A❑ Non -Layer I I—❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish , t _ s': ❑ Dairy Heifer A
El Farrow to Weans i ll #i' El D Cow
f
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Finish Z ❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑ Beef Feeder
�. ❑Beef Brood Cow
Other` R4
Cl Other
Other Numbb. of StructuresI All
Non -Layers
❑ Boars
El
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
12
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ Yes
,0<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: 77 — fG Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ON E
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes 21"o
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2`%
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
[DNA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes Ja<0
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes P<0
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes Ko
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes E2'rVo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes 3"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes P '&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes L3� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
.� ''�l t�' •t
Comments�(refer>to;question #) Explain;any YES answers and/or any recommendationVor�anygoiheomments. F
:. jz 3' ',.�
Vrl'
lase drawl" facility to better ex' situahons: (u§e.additional pages as necessary): ,.��� t� wr
F.. j.
Reviewer/InspectorName ��,
�H-PiJ'..' ¢,�`��
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 7 T — 1U Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J5 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes .Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
plq'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
2�_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
1.72<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
,.,� /
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with 'an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
lNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
RrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Add itionalWom�ents�andlor Drawings:
Lfr�3 /G
C,
�V C_J )e 6,,dl 5, � - 1- Cl /v _
12128104

Type of Visit QfCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 6 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I tfJ$'-/G I Arrival Time: ��,�c' Departure Time: d County: A0121 Region:
r
Farm Name: ` 4e�6f )L✓ It', C ; ` Z ., Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: I Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [= o [= I ❑ Longitude: = c
Xt
Design y Current . y t y Apesign ' Current
0 a'1'Nkt �*„ . t b'� x i `E i. s-=w k " S L, � ;fix %' •� ..AP,
i Swiise.rCapacity�Papulation WetPoaltryq.CapacityPopulation
"t- ... - '. t r• • s t _ 4.. z *, r . -; - av�
Cattle.
'ice
Design
Capaety
`.n..,gw
Current
Pop lation
tau€..tewrrouaw.
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑
Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish [] Dairy Heifer
❑ El D Farrow to Weans ix t
Dry }.Poultry Cow
El Farrow to Feeder ``' &"k` `" <' y '' ❑ Non -Dairy
' ' ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
S. ❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers ❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Pullets
❑❑Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
the1
01 urkey Pou Its
❑ Other ❑Other Number of Structures:.:
u ;
Discharyes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ATNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E!rNo
❑ Yes
2'�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
La"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number- Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: -1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ,j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o No ❑ NA FINE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ammlieation
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 23-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
EI'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�ZNo
(:1 NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
y., .. - -- ��
Comments (refer ku.,question,#) Explain any YES. answers and/o any recammendahons oyr%i yN6ther�comments
Use p drawings of facility to better exlain situations: {use aildittonal pages as nee,
s�'''_
�Y.i'�i;x "4'�1�'�
ReviewerlInspector Name '% ;;� �'JGi+ `' 1 '. i ': %" Phone: 919 7�/ y2lfi
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number.73 — 1 CG Date of Inspection
`Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
0—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21, Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
RVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and' 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes J"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
;D-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
�3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Add�t�onal Co iinmeptskandlor Drawings ` ,
Cc l•' S er-C e,�U
S'r,., / �e 14 - 22
s 1/ C�J �-�°y V �- o
-
jrtj (yls 3-27H,
Page 3 of 3 12128104

.J
Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
o Routine 0 Complaint
O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
111
Date of Visit: ;' Cl- t7 Arrival Time::
!tif Departure Time: �= GG County: 0Region: Rlb
Farm Name: 4el.3 °J / C.,-Af A1,0 T, r #-1 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator•
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number: _
Latitude: = ° = Longitude: = °
1=11
Design
Swine Capacity
Currant
Population
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle,
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dai` Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
2 C
❑Non -La er
prey Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
❑ Dai Calf
❑ Dai' Heifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
26' C
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[--]Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o
El NA
[I NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
,Or
2J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
�: o
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

,. Facility Number: -7 ] — / G
Date of Inspection U_o9
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
❑ Yes
2"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
J2"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
B No
[DNA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
;3No
[INA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
UNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > l0% or 10 ]bs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
Q'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
FerNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
F4fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
.Sn4'33 Ns'Fi:a�
Comments (tefer to gVuestion=#) Explain anyNYES�;answers and/dr,any recomm�e�ndatiionCor any, other comments
km
tUse drYawmgs of facility t6,better explain situations. r(use addltlonal pages as necessary/,I).
sk
Reviewerllnspector Name � 10iJ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,f Date:
Page 2 of 3 1-7126IU4 c,ontinuear

Facility Number: 1 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ,e No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
JZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ElYes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments=:indlor
S lvdje 9`2,y-c s 3. C
24 7- c
/V_ .2, V
Page 3 of 3 12128104

`7/P 3/0-r
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I Departure Time: County: _ JP_ C5Q r1l Region: -"—
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = c =' = Longitude: 0 ° 0
Design
Current
Design Current
Design Current
Capacity
Population
Wet Poultry C►apacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
inish
❑ La er
❑ Dai Cow
Feeder
J!!
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
Finish
El Dairy Heifer
Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
Feeder
❑Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
DImpactsischarses &Stream ,acts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
-dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

91
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a, If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ,B—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
l 1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 9<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
,!fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;;}'N10
❑ NA
❑ NE
..:�as� t:- v't:��Z$i���tiNi.,a:.�i'i'�.�..
Comments,(refer n gtiest on.#) Expla n any�YES a�ns�wers and/or any recomm �a�tioons�;ar any other comments.
Use°drawg7ings,af tacility%%to better expg*lam situations: (us6iadditaonga[ pages as.aecessar¢y):, .
4"si � 4Xsl.i9E :9 ���s< F �� N-4�F`��.����_t 3h�a�A1a�% {��s�1 k_.'
Reviewer/[ nspecto r Name Phone:
Reviewer/[nspector Signature- Date:
p __ I -1' 2 17/7immi I!'n ►i!lN ilOd
a— —

ft
.
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ W­Up ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps
p ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes •e� o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ,&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes O<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
F.�(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ej<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

i'-
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 730010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS730010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection_ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Other County: PIL§on Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 09/11/2007 Entry TIme:02:13 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Thomas Farms Pork Inc. 2
Owner: Jimmy L Thomas
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 8251 Oxford Rd Timberlake NC 275839116
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Off Todd Rd. from 49 N. SR 1547
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts Other Issues
Integrator:
Latitude:36°25'30" Longitude:78°54'51"
Certified Operator: Timothy R Thomas Operator Certification Number: 16789
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Timmy Thomas Phone:
24 hour contact name Timmy Thomas Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
' Site visit was conducted to collect GPS data to update farm coordinates in BIMS if necessary, and for creating new reliable location
maps in the future.
Mr. Thomas was not available on site, but.I left a message on phone with his wife about this visit and its intended purpose.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number: 730010
Inspection Date: 09/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Other
lAl-6 - 06.,..-6,,....-
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 30.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Otherlssues
Yes No
NA ,NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ ■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Page: 2

0 Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 7.,ZQQJQ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS730010 !_I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Person Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 04/17/2007 Entry Time: AM Exit Time: Incident M
Farm Name: Thomas Farms Pork Inc. 2 Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy L Thomas
Mailing Address: 8251 Oxford Rd Timberlake NC 275839116
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Off Todd Rd. from 49 N. SR 1547
integrator:
Latitude: 36025'30•'
Longitude: 78654'51"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy R Thomas
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16789
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Timmy Thomas Phone:
On -site representative Timmy Thomas Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number: 730010
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
" WUP dated 718105 "
• Waste analysis:
03/23/07 = 2.7
11109/06 = 1.1
. Soil Sample dated 02/06/07
• Stocking, Crop yield records available
• Reviewed waste application records - complete and balanced with weather codes and inspection initials
* Freeboard levels and rainfall recorded with initials
• Changes in waste levels are consistent with pumping records
* Irrigation calibration completed 03/30/06, Q 160GPM both reels
" Sludge survey completed 07/14/06; Sludge thickness = 2.4% LTZ = 5.3'
" Farm and records are well managed
* Vegetation on lagoon dike & crops on fields in very good standing
Page: 2

r . . fj
Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number : 730010
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Finish 260 241
Total Design Capacity: 260
Total SSLW: 368,420
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon PRIMARY 30.00 :7:8].00
Page: 3

r , ,
Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas l Facility Number: 730010
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? i ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) Cl ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? I ❑ m ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? i
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, eta)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? !
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ! ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

. a
Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number: 730010
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Nay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Appling
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number: 730010
Inspection Date: 04/1712007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
i
Annual sail analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
Q
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Q
■
Q
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
Q
Q
27, Did the facility'fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
■
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
i
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
Cl
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
39. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 730010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

16 Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit P Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: kpeparture Time: County: rra y'1 Region: 1�
Farm Name: -r C 2' Owner Email: rr
Owner Name: Yl^ h" L ` _ 'D yr'`_ou Phone: b � 3� �" 6 3-
Mailing Address: a1� q t � �cy 0.k-�- N C )_75z3
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:Title: Phone No:
tOnsite Representative: �0.T Integrator:
s ,a
Certified Operator: �YY\ � � _{ � �QYri �' Operator Certification Number: [ j � O[;
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: = c = Longitude: = ° 0 ` 0 «
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish Z v
Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
FLayer
Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
•f
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
C*No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

in
Facility Number: - (] Date of Inspection 71
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No
7
ElNA
[INE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptabl Crop Window ❑ Evidence o Wind Drifl ❑ Applicati Outside of Area �� 1
j 12. Crop type(s) r �� t" (171 j r 11�'� " '3 C�
13.
Soil type(s) _1 ✓`
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
1;11 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
FINo
El NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
06
��-
was CAV'_O-1 Ff •
o. v C- k �P
Reviewer/Inspecter Name j`� gvYL ` Phone: ? �344
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: o v
v 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection fl' -
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElWaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transferst Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
SPIE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
VIN
6J,
�� J �p
�V`U`Y` R S l r 1'n
1e J
P
LI-T �• 3 I
"�f Ck +�� 1,1 e.hA G V\ -0-1
of S-
v
v
12128104

... Division of Water_Quality, .. E..:��'
y`'NQ.Division of Soil and Water Conservatioq '1 L
FaCtLtumber a
` — — - 0 Other Agency , men
I
Type of Visit Co ce Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi o Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral o Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 / 1-�1 D!i I Arrival Time: L Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 74'*14-T el -lc " rz*, r" Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
IV
Latitude:
=O
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Longitude: = ° =
a
ent 0Desi n:'. CurrDesi n Current DCurrent".`
'Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry .Capacity Population Cattle Capac�ty,Populat,an'ry
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Fa Feeder
arrow to Finish
2
Gilts
❑ Boars
i:r >
Other
❑ Layer I
❑ Nan -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures`
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes In No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ Yes yNo
❑ NE
El Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE '
❑ Yes 011 "NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes NA
FNo
El
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:r]
Date of Inspection 3 ,�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): `I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ;'-No
No NA ElNE
ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes N I ❑ NA [INE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop El Evidence of Wind Drift
El Application Outside of Area
12.
/J,Window
Crop type(s) (D'C�^ ► t 1 w'ti�'1 SD �r bew H s
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP7
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
t5.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[—�'/lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
l 4' INNElNA El NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA El NE
4��No
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/inspector Name I Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Lc Date: 7 31 6
Page 2 oj'3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 7— f o Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ g Other
p
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 90 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 <No❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesFNo
NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
[I NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 730010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW-S73001Q ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Ooerations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: County: Person Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 05/10/2006 _ Entry Time:11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 AM
Farm Name: Thomas Farms Pork Inc. 2
Owner: Jimmy L Thomas
Incident M
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 8251 Oxford Rd Timberlake NC 275839116
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Off Todd Rd. from 49 N. SR 1547
Integrator:
Latitude: 36°25'30" longitude: 7Q"54'51"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Timothy R Thomas Operator Certification Number: 16789
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Timmy Thomas Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Mr. Thomas has performed calibration and aware that sludge survey due by Oct. 1, 2006.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number : 730010
Inspection Date: 05/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 30.00 62.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5730010 Owner -Facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number : 730010
Inspection Date: 05110/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
----..---- --------------.-._.-...-..p..-----
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility. Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number : 730010
Inspection Date: 05/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3 Forest (Hardwood &
Softwood)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Appling
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?.
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas
Facility Number : 730010
Inspection Date: 05/10/2006 inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
............................................................................
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0011
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
.........................................................
Yes No
NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas
Inspection Date: 0511012006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 730010
Reason for Visit- Routine
Page: 6

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - Facility: Jimmy L Thomas
Facility Number : 730010
Inspection Date: 05/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Technical Assistance
Needed
Provided
........ _... _................... .............................. I
34. Waste plan revision or amendment
❑
❑
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
❑
36. Review or evaluate waste plan w/producer
❑
❑
37. Forms need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
38, Missing components (list in comments)
❑
❑
39. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑
❑
40, Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
❑
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
42. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
❑
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
❑
45. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
46. Waste structure evaluation
❑
❑
47. Structure needs improvement
❑
❑
48. Operation & maintenance improvements
❑
❑
49. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
50. Site evaluation
❑
❑
51. Irrigation calibration
❑
❑
52. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
53. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
54. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
57. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
58. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
❑
60. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
61. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
62, Field measurements (GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
63. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
64. Waste operator education
❑
❑
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
66. Record keeping education
❑
❑
67. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
69. PLAT Assessment
❑
❑
70. Other
❑
❑
Page: 7

Permit: AWS730010 Owner - facility: Jimmy L Thomas Facility Number: 730010
Inspection Date: 05/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
List Improvements made by Operation
Improvement 1
Improvement 2
Improvement 3
Improvement 4
Improvement 5
Improvement 6
Page: 8

10lni'@Hq
Facility NutYtber 3 and Water Conservation
MENOther Agency
Type of Visit &C Tpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ICJ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Q Arrival Time: Q/!yl Departure Time; 1 1�� County: �
Farm Name: 5 vtk _, - tic. _— Owner Email:
Owner Name: 5�1'1�(M1�M �7 1Trrtw4f i µ4, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:i}►?S �s
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title:
Region: �K'V
Phone No:
Integrator: �J� dtIP•
Operator Certification Number: 167g7
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [= o = I Longitude: = ° = 4
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Laver
ION n_-La er
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ arrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other.
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
i
❑ Pullets
l urke s
Turke Poults
P
Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes �N ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — I Date of Inspection w-LF_
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
El Yes No
El NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes N
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: YJ
,
Spillway?: Y
Designed Freeboard (in):
t
Observed Freeboard (in): 36
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes A ❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes ?(No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Dritl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 4,--&ctA , o 64t , dati
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
;2fgo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElYes
❑ NA
❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
�/No
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b q I d 3 r D`2- loq --Ua�. Z� C� .�P,�?� lZo
G L kl- (p r
� s.
Reviewer/Inspector Name - 'a � � s, . ; Phone: ,S71—q7� 2
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date: p
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection I l flh0�
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
J2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriatebAx belo
�a}j
❑ Yes
[ Vo
v
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ W t a`�sis ❑ Waste
❑ Soil An/Dlis
Transfers
❑ Annual
Certification
f 04
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 mute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
;?'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
FZNA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
oNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
,dKNo
F
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ej' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
P?No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
,�'
][J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ZN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additioa"ominetits-and/6r Dra*inQS
D ra h �i °E .4 �W,�F.�v.3: ,���l.�, e.4 :�t.,r `�,�.'� w�.•5{_i'f6�i�fE.�
12128104

L
Visit <Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit A? Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 4 Time:
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
ermitted Ce ed Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: �. ., .. .... d ;atC.:............. ............................. County:.................................................................
.......... .......... .. ..........
Owner Name:
Phone No:
MailingAddress................_......................................................................................................................................................................._.................. ..........................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:..............................................._............_.............................................. Integrator:......................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 ` " Longitude • 1 64
E ;
Swiine ; t
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
U'Parrow to Finish
Non-
t! {
EE
❑ Gilts F a N
i iE
' h.13Y�i
❑Boars Y 1I„ Nt Q�Q����L1♦T iM
Y P
q.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes 2�No
❑ Yes �2No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0"NNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 7NO
o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 -Structure 6
Identifier: ....Ph,..... ................ .....................
.......................................
..............................................
............................ ......
Freeboard (inches): o�b
12112103 Continued

Facility Npmber: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes dNo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel Wi7P, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes VfNo
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,ErNo
❑ Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑ e nalys s ❑ Viteflect
l Sampling
3fe r
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applica etback criteria at the time of design? El Yes to
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certifissd On for .char e? ❑ Yes�No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency $ tua�fos as requir d by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ,E No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes t" o
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes �No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. E
— — mq4 # zf 73' 2,6127 y zg
4�
4c-
(WA) 4 7
C�Mhi) #-,b
r
"4
21j _ r37Z
c - (R71
10" 3
Ck - Z
Zn► — 124
cot — I
Z J.) - o64
64t - 'Z p a 3
7 N i&5 y
�c — 2110
Cw /l(,78
a sy; �% �A►r,�e�,.s� Cu O-W,
AW14
12112103

Facility Number: 1 — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yeso
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes �No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ,,ZYes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes X`No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes`No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ,Rj`No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ,Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type [ A) W "►
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
❑ Yes 2fNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes 00
❑ Yes k(No
❑ Yes P(No
Final Notes
12112103 Continued

i
Type of Visit ,C.,00mpliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Vlslt Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:rO SSA►
Not O erational Q Below Threshold
0-Permitted Certified 13Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: �► ���+� Phone No:
Mailing Address: Q
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: r Operator Certification Number: A 2B q
Location of Farm:
wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 6 11 Longitude 0• 1 66
Design
CurrentDesign Current Design `
Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry Capacitv Population Cattle Capseltv
Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer I El
i
El Feeder to Finish
❑Non La er ❑ Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F rrow to Feeder
❑Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total.SSLW
., N�Y
0.._.
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray
Field Area
Holding'Pands I Solid Traps ``'�
❑ Na Li uid Waste Mgt ement S stem
id -
iR
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
WasteCollection 8r Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav
tructure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: L
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes IVo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 7No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes /TT �fo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — p I Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes El No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste- Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes O<o
12. Crop type /,J) J 5ITMk "t
13,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified AnimarWaste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
;2rNo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
1Vo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ONO
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
J2fNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
PNo
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
2TNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
<c
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
,_
0
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
Y�40
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
XNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
ZNo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
4!:�No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes;�No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. will receive no furtherg correspondence about this visit.
�You
@iimments {refer.to question #) I xplain any YESanswers andlorany recommeodations�oranyat r comment w
1t
.r
yUse drawings�of+fael6ty to betterexplain situattons; {usetaddttlorial°pages asnecessary):
Field Copy ❑ Notes
w4s:::'.rk:�iE`�F.::.41c...LMBI"Aifrd. 4.::..: .".J a.� �. `F 3... .. '° ..ilk" ... A "..`
Vu �(5 - t.�
312403 —zl�jy
�, , z — 3.L)
.�b��— •� o�0 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name (hdlA�
l-,;f:a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 7 o
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — !d Date of Inspection 03
Odor ss
2& Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Fe - No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes'No
05103101

r
Type of Visit f Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number L
Date of Visit: Time:rO t
Not Operational OBelowThreshold
Permitted Certified ,�D Conditro
ally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Q)`z5 T1d.t/ws yiCounty:
Owner Name: `�1Phone No:
Mailing Address: z s� ft
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: -nio
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' ` Longitude 0a ° 011
Design Current Design - Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE3 Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy I
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number"of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present J10 Lagoon Area ILI Spray Field Area
'
Bolding Ponds 1 Solid Traps"; :� ° ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts 1
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches); ([
05103101
I/
❑ Yes ONO
El Yes Ko
ElYes
❑ Yes
j2<o
❑ Yes
8 No
❑ Yes
No
[]Yes
/No
Structure 6
Continued

FacilityNumber: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 10
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes TNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes PNo
Waste Apnlicatian
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZZINgo
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes � N
12. Crop type-k-5U,6I; , j.A)PW j_ UW
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes , FErNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes �No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes oNo
t6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes , o
Required Recards_& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Feo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal W st Management Pl n h�eeadily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) $ O) , Z ! O� rr�(
❑ Yes N
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, wa to aZ analysis soil samps�rts) i ❑ Yes p�VZN
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? • ❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes PNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? El Yes �o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes VNo
�] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
—� Y.,�A•,tl�FM^'v`ils'^+KLe'Ti't:N�;_4" . - - . -.
Comments {referto qui gtio.n. : Eaplaln any YES answers;and/or any recommendations ar°any oth ' c utments.`
rsAP� rtprwk1$nNr adore M,
U�sedrawings of facflit}Ito-6elter:expla'lnsttuations.,(use additionei;ages:as n awry): ❑
Field Copy Final Notes
t' rum-
Reviewer/Inspector Name V:.+. _, 4; ' .,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: D
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: % — Date of Inspection
Odor r ss ues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes A!J"No
❑ Yes .o
❑ Yes 4�N
❑ Yes No

Type of Visit 49 Cofnpliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: � Time: --
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted Q Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ty•.................................................................... ...........
... ........................................................... Coun
�j
Owner Name:.. V( r.!Lt QMItS Phone No:...� Y — uO
............................,..................33............................
FacilityContact: .. ........................................... ........................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.... Zt r..... .�k '- i....................................................................................... ..........................
............................................................
Onsite Representative:........1tie.wW....�laiti......................................................... Integrator:........ .�e•4!!........................................
Certified Operator:.....7— ............. ' ' .................................... Operator Certification Number: ... `68 7. ...................
Location of Farm:
[Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude 0 6 66 Longitude • 4 64
Design Current
Design Current,'' Design Cnrcentt
SwYne Ca ace :Po
ulatton Pnnitry
Ca aci Po''ulation Cattle Ca aci , I?'o utlitio {
[I Wean
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
3
° ❑ Other
Total De>I n Ca cit
f.
TataISSLW3W.
;
Number. of Lagoohs
❑Subsurface
Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
`Holdin s
�� No Li uid Waste Management System
,Poadsl�Sohd_Tra
to Fender
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
°..F;
❑Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
�a
Gilts
❑Boars
Discharees &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon El Spray Field ❑Other _
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes NO
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �No
c. If discharge; is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [I Yes � No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes q No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure; S Structure 6
Identifier: .....�'..�.P:@A...�..................................................................................................:......................................................
....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 6 Continued on Lack

s.
'Facilty Number: 3 — 1p Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �(No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? I BaI6s ❑Yes [NrNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �rtj No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes `P No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes foNo
Additional !Comments -landlorDrawings- i k'E 6' ' k
i
T
5100

\ Facility Number: — f D Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes tJ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes KNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes K No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes j No
11. Is there evidence, of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [I Yes [KNo
12. Crop type U�tZ a t` S u. E 1W u.� �o Cj
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes (RNo
14. a) Does thefacility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes JP No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [� No
15. Does the receiving crop need itprovement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Wa e Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) /a t 112,1101
19 Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
4 YiQ1a iQ>�js:o iigficient'i" -wt rb )tote#- O(wiog �his'vjtsjt;, :Y60 )va]j•tecgiye 00 flutft.
- . • eor'res'porideii e: about; this visit: ...:....::...::........:........... .
ents,(refer to question ##) ; Ekpiai i,any YES saswers and/or any
a,.
❑ Yes [RNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes No
VfYes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes R f No
❑ Yes (ALNo
[:]Yes RNo
❑ Yes [StNo
�e c,*J Mt ([,cwrii'1d i Vjztt Itj sr4 4 iv 4y�o tN3,eec N 003660lNels u `
a[rV5 "AIJ 425-[M Sff6V 2 {
Ay
32co — — ors — 1 Q� ,� .
Sa�f l 318• ZN--188fo � �� �f z-� za - 7L4, zN -4wtvl IL"
1o7z
rH - 11,9 `I Gti _ gl►G CK - 17 s'7
Reviewer/Inspector Name I s a u..r %r P � 71"`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: a/4-�a/ v 5100

Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number u Date of Inspection HEN
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
/+ermittedAJ�Certified r] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........... µn" .t°r.....f ...ri AI .a�!.. w..Cr................................ County: ...........P� .�r.[.............................................
�. .
Owner Name: ro .1-J.. �G S'I 6 /. Phone No
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:........................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
OnsiteRepresentative:.....! f!!M �I.....��� d t 1.................................................. Integrator:.........1 ......................... ..................................
Certified Operator:..................................:................................:........................................I... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
.... ..... .............
Latitude ®� ZS Zy Longitude �g • F r.J` ®"
!
Destgn, E i;1Current ,i':°E r�°,i`r,Destgn..-{Current
t,
Poultr at e + s .!,�1,.�'. �Ca acr
Y,°�.Ca aci ;IFPo' ulahon`' �3, !=�Po"""ulahon
t�
!
y
❑ ... y ❑Dairy
Layer
E°,';!
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
i?>
.i,' z
4 f
9rtttta , tr
❑ Other
;
3
'Total Desgn'Capactty,;t
f c
r'�
�� _� ! Total SSLW
lt�'t.lfii!]E:,
3
Number of Lagoons' i �3> �,
#
❑ 5�ray Feld Area
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area
i
! iHoldrng Ponris / Sohd Traps
� �
3'iil{ ir4a c
p3+N€}
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
r
5 €r
Design Current ,
.-'Po' illation ,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
.
❑ Farrow to Feeder
arrow to Finish
Z �
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State'? (II' yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) ........ 3.......�............ ...................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes •�, NO
❑ Yes �To
Structure 6
❑ Yes
Continued on back
3123/99

Facility Number: 73 — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? . ❑ Yes PI<o
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Gll�o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P'No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes P No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes 00
12. Crop type, or -A va tAq._A-tr V-:F_ S%_u F
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes _ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes P-go
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes eNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �To
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? /Y�?,R ❑ Yes A,0 No
18. 'Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) l ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste4dnalysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes jNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design? ❑ Yes/E TINo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes jZfNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ZNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes A No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes VNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes eNo
?90•001a 40s'o�r 00006*ki N *'re jtgted- �lojft �hjs;vjsjt! • You will ;ec�iye 06 futthoe
'Corresnoridence' about: this visit.: :......:....................... .
R) VS44 1116N� , c�-, !? rot SaM� F�£�o�I�Yvf ors I�'L �4� S, (,, 7,8 A,
wr re%70R,4t 227195-3� s.,e,_✓l�E f
�N-tiPUcis — Zr.' C�.SG G,a
� 5� I�SJ Ivos�-Q
A r3 A LA S V_S SN e W Lam, w Z— tr 5
L� ur;TGFtEh' Tn tea-� n[ tlo �PIJ ev f F t7 14-Te.Grok Ljd I.U. tiac-As-r Wi`r*- nfCo/-
,E -Ao
i6}g'p"F�S"p
ector Name
p 3 , Ek-� i►�ra3„ri,t� o
Reviewer/Ins.�Es,��`€�'��rssi
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. �]��, _ _ .�. Date: 15/111 CZ7

Facility Number: —1
Date of I»spection S f r
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
s, No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is land intake located
Yes
No
the application spray system not near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑
EJ
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
dN0
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
PINO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
,fNo

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
FacilityNumber .3 - t � O eration is flagged for a wettable
�— P
Farm Name: >p, a s ram--_ acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: E ,w Part 11 eligibility item(s) F9 F2 F3(R)
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit: Zft� ti
Date of most recent WUP: qZzet %
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: '1 7 Z pounds
Irrigation Systems)'- circle #:b'hard-hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pip tationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe ationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an, 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, includin_ g map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP. �--- _
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
�F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
f_-
Facility Number 7 3 _ ,o
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.'
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
; FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
cf L
cry
Iq
NA A—-z.
4
z.y
l�
-
fi��,.,
t o .
�- 7
3Z1O
3 z1 c
Z
3
�-
8
-+
Tr _
FIELD NUMBER'
- hvdrant. Dull_ zone_ or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers
deoendino on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER'- must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less.than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

,,. j k 1, ,
?Dlvtsto`n of Sciil and Water �.Conservatjon - Operation ke' vrew E I E; , r ��
1r =E
©IDrvision of,Soil and W.>ter'Conservation - Compliance itispectron r' !
E - !
.)prv�sIon of Water Qu Arty ',' C om lianie Inspection
�.�`Qtlter Aglncy - Oper. 1tio12� CV1eW - _ E• � � i i �'� E- n E E� rare'.. rj E , . �.� E .�
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow -tip of D\V 7 ins mction Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility- Number Malt of Inspection r
11"itile of Inspection ��:: f 24 hr. (hh:mm)
)dPermitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered 113 Not O eraiional Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: �. .Q.!V!.]AS.....FAIZM County .. �...t N
..... ...........................I................. ................
Owner Name: ..................... ;.- ... Phone No:
........................................................................................................................................................................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................. hide:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Flailing Address: .......................................
Onsite Representative:....Ti!b+</V`�f....`Ck ?M!P•�...................................................... Integrator:...!!�ID i'E. .`j............................. I.............
..........I.
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.,...i.671.....................
Location of Farm:
..................................................................................................................................... .
Latitude 0 4 4 Longitude • ° "
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
2.(;
Z6a
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nun -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ( ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JEI No Liquid Waste tManagement System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If' yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other f
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan-rnadc'? ❑ Yes ;gNo
h. II' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of'the State ❑ Yes [�[ No
c. If' discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min :� j
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sysicm?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
Structure I StrUCLUrc 2 Structure -1 Structure 4
�}. t........................................................................
Structure 5
❑ Yes 3 No
❑ Yes [:gNo
❑ Yes L2rNo
❑ Yes ONo
Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

1
acility Number: •7,3— i Date of Inspection z lh
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes XNo
s a etc )
eep ge,
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Arc there any buffers that need maintenance/imprnvcnient'?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes RNO
❑ Yes El No
[:]Yes ;?No
❑ Yes 1XNo
1 I . Is them evidence ofover application'?
❑ Ponding
❑Nitrogen
❑ Yes No ,
12. Crop type .......... 5i. .:...............lnl.ka
-A.` .:Y...:......
LZ ...................................,...........................................I.....
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need impi-ovetnent?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to c all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklist: design aps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes P/No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes INo
❑ Yes &NO
❑ Yes 0No
[:]Yes ONO
❑ Yes W(No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative`? ❑ Yes R�No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by sarne agency? ❑ Yes ONO
N.o.vialations.or. deficiencies .were noted. during thii•visit:.1'ot ' �vill.re�ceive ita t6riliei- .:.:.
b6er-4spotidenee;abbut;this;visit.......;•;•;•;•;•;•;•;•;•;•;-;•;•;•:. . . • ;•;•
Camtnents (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any.recommen'&66i s�or any other comments'
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
f.) L EAGv n1 Cw_oi,�D tl£.CD C01 CF- C",za£. P(Mj c4,.fTA-(S J;Au 441%, `
7) ry a TIS 9-CA7-S 1 rtV-4.06c-rJ R-F b a r J-1CZ 7 i A9t*-E 5 S �-OfJoFf­ ",J'v
A,JD C"j—, NJE_ Rv000 UPP Lp„}i Ro;�_ A" v -J o f.Ab0.zA
Reviewer/Inspector Name
091f A1_ Add_r `t+,i) S?I y7ac7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:4.1Date: A I bI iq 11/6/99

FACILITY NUMBER 73 -ice
FARM NAME: <,SotAk&
REVIEWER:Cal,-,�
DATE:-2- r f
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON - PAN
POND - PAN
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGN/VOLUME CALCULATIONS:
Top of dike elevation:
Eiev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation:
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume -7 ft3
Temporary storage volume, '7 _ ft3
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi)
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr)
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design,
Design
Design
Design
WUP - Days of temporary storage:
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:.
ft. 15t 25 yr.l24 hr, storm in.
ft. 2"d 25 yr.124 hr. storm in.
ft. Structural freeboard in.
Exceeds required volume?
Zw-77-(- L Exceeds required volume?�� L
4
#-r— T-
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
FREEBOARD CK.
L 1
L 2
3
4
. 5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date: ��rm;
CM
Completed Certification Date:
Waste Utilization Plan; Date: '�rZz (Q$ z�O
Amount of plant available nitrogen produced/used annually Ibs)
Dominant soil series: Ar ?
Crops to be grown: L
Field Maps
Usable= }
application windows 2/1/93;
Based on usable (Total=
Present day format w/RYES or actual records;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97) t0—V (
Type of irrigation: �ave[Ving S id -
Other (description):
'-r 8Q+'
Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1/96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (afterl;9/1/96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculation's)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2/96 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including Liner inspection & observation trench (after
911 /96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21/96)
REQ IRED RECORDS effective 9/1/96 PERMITTED fACILITIES
Waste application records (IRR 1 &2) General Permit & COC on site
,`ir° Annual soil sample reports for 1999 weekly lagoon level records
(Cu index:
(Zn index: ) f oe�
l Waste analysis - date last taken is 7%
ti PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for stru'ctufe #1
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #2

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
[Division of Water Quality
14YRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up U DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other J
i Facility Dumber Date of lnsp\ olio« �
'7 ��
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:........: ....................
,L..'3.a^' �5....................�e �^R S County: ................
.►'S,uf....................... .....................
..
...........
OwnerName:..... .'?kn l fi'�`r. ►.c..............: [.,�5.................... Phone No:.................................................................................. �,? x.........�........ ........................
Facility Contact:......:..e.^'4. ............ Title 6� Nlny............................ Phone No:
MailingAddress:......... ............ ........... :........... `"............................ r�6i `:.... ............................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative: ........... ' ...................................................F................. ..Integrator•......................
Certified Operator;........... `� M ................... Operator Certification Number;....................
Location of Farm:
Mc
C
Latitude �° Longitude �• �SO
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes LRNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes (<o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2<01
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? -(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes L9'110
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes !1No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Lt3"No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes EJ'N0
maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 2<0
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Cl Yes 01�0
7/25/97 Continued on back

4
Facility tiumber:23 — 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 2 t o
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes UkKo
. Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier......'? 1.................. .... .............................................................................................. ...
Freeboard (ft), ........ . `... '� V
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
El Yes
,L��l,'�\0
l�o
12.
Do any of the structures need niaiirtenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
dNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimwn or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
PI\o
Waste Application
_/
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
i1'No
(if in excess of WQMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type T.:.scu.t.............F.!'?�iGk�....9r�ia......... ...... fir!!r........................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW'vl )'.
❑ Yes
No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
13 No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes'
OjNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑Yes`
tl_o,`
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes-
13<0
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'.'
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
El Yes
,_,_,
Oi o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑'Yes
^�/�
Ltif No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
"' "''`' '' "" �`�, `❑
25:
W re any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of theTerrriit? '
Yes
No ,
U
No.violations o.r deficiencies were noted•du.6ng this vis`it.- You will receive no further
correspondence shout this.visit. :
Cnminents (irefer tp question #) Explat�n any YESbanswers and/or any recomtnendanons or any other commentsµ'
Use drawings of facility to �etter explain situations.,(,use additions{ pi; e s as necessary)-offlM
e G11>5 e.tt �"`11 S fa
7/25197
Reviewer/Ins ector Name
P t 3 a►-iGs (NeiAr
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: [..&� lle._� Date:

DSWC •Animal .Feedlot Q "eration Review,
❑ P
MWQ Animal Feedlotp O e'ration Site Inspection
rallo O Com laint O Fo llow-up of DWQ inspection O Fiillow-uti of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 5 q
Facility dumber Time of Inspection eta'. Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:.....„_„.. � � , _ _ Total Time (in hours) Spent ouReview
""—""' or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm tiame:.._�!n41N1�1S �Ar1lY� ».»»._.. „ _ ._..._ County:..„..k��?� SdYl.... ....»...__ _ ..". ..........
OwnerNan:e:..'.M Phone
Mailing Address:.-5 VZC
Onsite Representative: .
Certified Operator:
Location of Farni: o ��
Integrator:....."..............................._»..........._............."_
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude Longitude
❑ Not O erational Date Last Operated: .. „. ........__ ..." .......„ » ....._".„ ......_...„.."_._....".""_
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
0 Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
IV Farrow to Finish 2_(n0 St,WSi `❑ Other Type of Livestock f t;, 49 rv, 0s *,.
w'-g .RMl -' ti'kr: , M!.,'�,�'s "'s z"';I h '? X?*•-•�°I .mr er a'' '' t: ." Eo. x- .. ro M";°,'ikn e'ax�,.. a .� ' r,'
� Number�otL`agoat s �HoldingYPonds Z �� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present tA, C�
10 Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
General y
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ER/No
2. Is any discharge observed -from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes !o
..
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes li�'No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Ye -sr (moo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/mite? N pr
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M��<�
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? n ❑ Yes M"No
4. Was there anv adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes i/o
5. Dots any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require ❑ Yes 9I 0
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes-
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/l/97)? ❑ Yes MKO
8 Are+there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? GlIes [:]No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Iioldinrt 1?onds) W 6�� W SW
9. Is structural fi eeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑o'
Freeboard (ft): La oa�n 1 Lagoon ? Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4�µ .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? CAO CO_ n,y,r �q$ ❑ Yes MWO
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? cr,;, dike_ cf— o<j Ues ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ?�� ❑Yes W'ivo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ,�/
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ❑ EerYes No
Waste Ayylicatlon
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes Mli o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type . CU
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? 46 �1(.w�} `" ❑ Yes ❑ No
G]-r
acreage
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate for land applicaddh? Q ❑Yes o
18.
Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
U<O
For Certified Facilities Oniv
20.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No23.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Grl o
24.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ERIO
Comments (refer taaquestion #} €Iyxplaui any YF.S answers and/or any recommendatioaY or aay other cainments
LisC drawings of ;a04W t0 better lam siivauons: 6 se addtttanal a as"neces
4
' a
Reviewer/Inspector Name i , .`., (t W:_ �3 a
Revi►ver/Inspector Signature: l Date: Q�
cc: Division of Wafer Quality, fZarer Qualir)' ecrion, Facility Assessment Unit 1 1/1.4/96

Facility Number
Farm Status: EjlRegistered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection I If W
Time of Inspection /, , .3 el 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Tirne fin traction otlrours
(ex:l.24 for I hr IS mint) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
E3��Not Operational Dat .Last Operated; ..........D..........
.............................................................................................I..............................
Farm Name:..... .rla!r.: •�.)...,,� 'tQr..2.... .�e�c ✓1.'.1 �...LJrf:: Countv__.,.(....,�J................................ ... ...........
.r .
Owner Nanm:..it
.................. ;'lr,C.........................................
.................. Phone No:...FaciEit� [ olrt:lct: r~�!fiz�.M; .. �% SerQ.................... Title:... z,�f ................................... Phone No: 1G..,
11-lailingAddress:.......A..�..Li.)..f............�.�CI..;( Y�.,1�.�:�..................................1/J.�s."1::.��1..�......l:�6...............I ..�./�=� �,
.r
Onsite Rep resentatire:,,.1f . ��,:,...... �....�- .................... Integrator:
.........., .............................
Certified Operator ................................................. .............. I.—............................................. Operator Certification Number:...................,
Location of harm: , , _
C:a4f..:..I........z f.....1.14�....J_ ?Rix......h�.a....�:'.....................................................................................................................................
...... ...................................................... ............................................. ........... ................. ................................ ................................................................. .....................................
,
Latitude .s G' 11 Longitude 0� 1 49
Type of Operation
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population .; Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
arrow to Finish
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ on -Dairy
Total Design CapacityS--
TotaI'Sk*W :
Number of Lagoons /Holding Ponds E:1= ❑ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area 10 SprayField Area
- - - W , --IYWr�r rY�WrWr9rYlYYllr 14 W IYWrIY
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischan-,e is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Ifdischarge is observed, did it reach Sarf�ace Wator? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding pond) require
4/30/47 maintenance/improvement`?
❑ Yes
. ,'o
❑ Yes
, o
❑ Yes
[ -11"o
❑ Yes
GKJ
❑ Yes
[3T'o
❑ Yes
0<o
❑ Yes
0
❑ Yes
i] 6
Continued on back

sr
I
1E acility \umber; • —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
TO
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
L'Yes
❑ No
,structures (l,aW tins and/or Holding fonds)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
• 'a
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[ 0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Leo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Li X01
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
El Yes
�
2 o
Ni'aste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
❑ Yes
(If in excess of N or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
f
15. Crop type .tea r . .........`r .li..4......6.,:�Wzt.....................................................
................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AM'MP)?
❑ Yes
i
[3 No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ YesNo.•
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ETNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®Na
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�N/o
21. Did Reviewer/Ingw4.1or fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
©i<10
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
,Comments,(rferto qtibn#)Explai'mther�cippments
'• `_: ;a .-.-.h.:.k _. :-:. .� -.. �). ,. ..-".t ;' �.. '., .. :..�. - vim. - �}.`.. ..c .. _ „? -�
, � J
leiC'l as, G _ _�•��/ � ,L s-•-�-- �.z' �: -�, �.�-,,
Reviewerllnspoetm Name
Reviewer/IaepeMr Signature:
cc: Division of Water
Quality section, Facility Assessment Unit
Date: r. < i
4/30/97

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] Jul 20 '95 17:41 P.12/17
17-aity Nuvat -er=
SITE VISrrX110 {RECORD
Dn�2: � •�.1�._� 1395
W BR �►r'
Owner. •� Tana KBmc:�ro�►,
Co=ty. *Lzclo�—
AgemI Visiting &its fir rF►onc: .59 - �9�
i]jicratof: mm tip.n S_,. _ ... -- ,�J4,.-2rr71
On Shn Rep=cnrxjv*: I'haaa:
r1,yjlc.l Addgw: L o rea. ov U, s.:,fw. afi s IC 5 4'7 } A a. ._►� �
- . b� 5 R Is 2xn) - /
Mailing. Addm--4;
J 2- -7 S:a 3
Type at Op4mtian: swine �_. Poultry Cajklc
r+:siaq Cappnity; DSO Nunbcr of Animals w girtef:
1,%tir-de: Cam° .2.5 3 a LouslLudo:
Type of Insixcuon: Cimund ✓ � Acdal _
Circle Yss ar we
Dacs the Aitiss.tid Wosre Lsgoen htvp- xuIIle:eat fx-abaardl of I Fact -- 25 vrir-24 hvus s;otso evcst
(approx1mmely I Foot , 7 bcUc) (� or No �i Frx :rand_ .2 !C: IncF>
T-er fncilidtm wia, more tka =e,,;tUnm;, PIC=addrsss the eri:cr:agooas, f�C:bamrd enddr tke
c:. m1mifs
Was any s4up2gc o6ser�ed WeS erc5l1Dn �L ttta dttm?: Y&I a�
Is ad'Nuwe Iorid avaBabl= far Lard sppiiwmicm? Ycs or No is :Inc a,ye- crop ad:gaib? Yes or No
Ad:.'Wv.,,.al C'ommenm + ta• e� es�� �}�.� 1f1N
CA..1e� A� � _ 3�-rr• Pq r i � � � I
� 4
FtLc rn C� i °) 735-355h iie�.atur� oi'.a[
Z10'39dd 0w, f•QSa3d UGSI-i W0:33 1 1 : s i SF_. - 07- -ini

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
.fames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
James Thomas
Route 1, Box 626
Timberlake, N.C. 27583
Subject:
Dear Mr. Thomas
Division of Environmental Management
September 13, 1995
Compliance Inspection Report
Weaver Swine Farm
Person County
On September 6, 1995, Mr. Steve Mitchell, from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Mitchell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface
waters of the state, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the
purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed.
Please continue to properly manage the waste and wastewater generated by this farm to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Environmental Management is required to enforce
water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are required to have an approved
animal waste management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical
specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions
regarding your inspection please call Steve Mitchell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ju Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Person County Health Department
James Poindexter- Person County Soil and Water Conservation District
Sieve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
RRO and Central Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: September 6, 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: James Thomas
Mailing Address: Route 1 Box 626, Timberlake N . C . 27583
County: Person
Integrator:
On Site Representative: Jimmy Thomas
Physical Address/ Location: S . R . 1547
Type of Operation: Swine _XX_
Design Capacity: 250
DEM Certification Number: ACE
ACNEW
Phone:
Phone:[phone]
Poultry Cattle
Number of Animals on Site: ^
DEM Certification Number:
Latitude: 36° 25' 30" Longitude: 78° 54' 54" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour
storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes Actual Freeboard: 2. 5_Ft . Was
any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? No Was any erosion observed? No Is
adequate land available for spray? Yes/No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes/No
Crop (s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? Yes 200 Feet from Dwellings?
Yes 100 Feet from Wells? Yes Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of
USGS Blue Line Stream? No Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25
Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the
state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? No
If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop) ? No
Additional Comments : Facility has just been purchased from new owners and most of
the animals were lost to disease. Owner has just started with restocking animals.
Slight over land seepage from collector box at end house.
Inspector Steve Mitchell Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Jul 20 '95 17:41 P.12/17
3'acility Numt�: 7 3�—
Si?E YISITA7'1O� R�C�W3
DATE:
Owner. W eJ�,•r
Marra Kame: %L,_ b,�►-s
co=ty. _ fie _A , .....�. .
Agee t Vtaiting Sit= ;r�A.:� 5 7 - Q7
2.4 71
Oa Site Reprmcnualvo. _ _ Photo'
pl�ys{ca1 Add*w, La ewre a . eJ ���.,4� �� _5 [5 4 7 � A e AF e_ Y . . 4_ +� t
N,J. s{ Ste -Oa 02d1
Mullin Addre.:s: - l Mmx 926
Type of t7j'rereliou: Swing ✓ Panitty CaLdc
rrsign CapDcity: 'NumbcrofAnimals on Sitz:.---
i ltirr�!r Ca..° .ZS , 343
Type of It spc cu: 0re:u0 ✓_ -- Awal,
OmIc Ycs or yc
Docs the Aitljral Write ].vaen �ivs xoXident ft-eel•oeer: of i Fact t 25 yv- r1-4 hour s;olrn
(ripprc:tiarnlcly 1 Foot 47 bobea) (S� or No rp;x cmd: „ Z T-czt 4- Incur -
For facititlex wit4 more tki =e Agnott, pinsc addrms the ilia
cvIDIIICitLS se 60a.
Was any Sw►Psgc obscr:ad i=.:r ti iapat:(s)? Yea ot�'�n: f tha tarn?: Yc oj(�
Ix sclx�ua:c larui svafIablc fc�r i3rd appiiruirasz? Y� or Rio Is :�_ G�vL`: crop ��na�? Y� ar Na
LPL-1ie�eT�►T� ice?' �ae�S_ �1- ! .
Ftux ►O f419) 715-3559 Sieratum ofAo=it
'f. r
E 10 ' 39dd O,J HCIS33d H
OSt'i wo�Jj T i —:"I s ;-,. Ei_7 1ni

Bernard, .lane
From:
Larick, Keith
Sent:
Monday, April 15, 2013 3:25 PM
To:
Bernard, Jane
Cc:
Bolich, Rick
Subject:
Complaint - AWS730010
Jane,
I got a call from Keith Daye in Person County, and he has an issue with AWS730010 (off of Todd Rd. in Person Co.). He
says there are bad odor issues with the farm, etc.
Could you give him a call? His number is [phone]. It may be more of a DAQ issue, but I'll let you make that call.
Thanks,
Keith
Keith Larick
Supervisor, Animal Feeding Operations Unit
[phone] phone
[phone] fax
www.ncwaterquality.org
----------------------------
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
1

Bernard, Jane
From:
Larick, Keith
Sent:
Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:25 AM
To:
Bernard, Jane
Cc:
Joshi, J.R.
Subject:
RE: Complaint - AWS730010
Thanks for the follow-up. If it's really an odor issue, there isn't much we can do other than forward it to DAQ.
Keith
----------------------------
Keith Larick
Supervisor, Animal Feeding Operations Unit
[phone] phone
[phone] fax
www.ncwaterguality.org
----------------------------
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
From: Bernard, Jane
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:24 AM
To: Larick, Keith
Cc: Joshi, J.R.
Subject: RE: Complaint - AWS730010
Keith,
J.R. and I were at the farm last Friday. They have not had any. applications this year as a result of a clean out they did
last fall. There was not an odor issue at the time we were on the farm.
Therefore the odor is not from the applications themselves. The creek did appear to be a bit discolored downstream as
well as upstream from the farm That could be explained by all the rainfall we have had.
We received an identical complaint last year 4/12/12 from a Crystal Brooks whom had identical wording for the
complaint.
I did try to explain to him (as I did Crystal) that there really wasn't much we could do. I gave Mr. Daye the number for air
quality:
Last year I asked crystal to log the date and times of the odor and to pass them on to us to see if it was tied to
applications but I have not received the info.
JANE R. BERNARD
Environmental Specialist
Aquifer Protection Section
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office- [phone] ext. 4236
Cell- [phone]
Fax- [phone]
E-mail- lane.bernardfo�ncdenrgov
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

From: L.arick, Keith
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:25 PM
To: Bernard, Jane
Cc: Bolich, Rick
Subject: Complaint - AWS730010
Jane,
I got a call from Keith Daye in Person County, and he has an issue with AWS730010 (off of Todd Rd. in Person Co.). He
says there are bad odor issues with the farm, etc.
Could you give him a call? His number is [phone]. It may be more of a DAQ issue, but I'll let you make that call.
Thanks,
Keith
----------------------------
Keith tarick
Supervisor, Animal Feeding Operations Unit
[phone] phone
[phone] fax
www.ncwaterauality.or,
-----------------------
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.

40A*
��
ncENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Jimmy Thomas
Thomas Farms Pork, Inc #2
8251 Oxford Road
Timberlake, NC 27583
Dear Jimmy Thomas:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
February 8, 2013
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS730010
Thomas Farms Pork, Inc
Animal Waste Management System
Person County
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge survey information on January 7,
2013. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for
-the lagoon at Thomas Farms Pork, Inc #2 facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume
available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until 2015.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon at this facility should be performed before December 31,
2015. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me at [phone] if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit File AWS736010
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Ralelgh, North Carolina 27699.1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 91H07-W4 FAX: 919-807$4801FAX:91M07.6496
Internet: www.ncwatemualitv.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
No thCarolina
AaturallryI

0(� W A rF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co 7
j [ Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
'{ Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Jimmy & Timmy Thomas
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
8251 Oxford Road
Timberlake NC 27583
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No, AWS730010
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Person County
Dear Jimmy & Timmy Thomas:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jimmy &
Timmy Thomas, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
• land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS730010 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Thomas Farms Pork Inc., located in Person County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 260 Farrow to Finish swine and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Pcrmit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record kee in
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
_ , Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NofthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us %�����y�jy���
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper . Y L Ll

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H 0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this .
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be,final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our RALEIGH Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]: If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at (919) 715 26186.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ce's)
RALEIGH Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Person County Health Department
Person County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS730010
APS Central Files
•

THOMAS FARMS PORK, INC.
CERTIFIED MAIL
August 6, 2004
S. Jay Zimmerman, L.G.
Regional Supervisor
NC Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Facility # 73-10
Dear Mr. Zimmerman,
8251 Oxford Road
Timberlake, NC 27583
336-364-2971 t r
[e-mail]
In reference to you letter dated July 28, 2004, regarding the Zinc and Copper Indices,
we wish to update you on the situation and procedure we will be implementing.
We realize the level of the copper values on samples #27 (2083) and #28 (2110) are
excessive, and we are monitoring them closely. We are seeing a great deal of variation in
sample levels from year to year. As an example, the previous years sample for #27 was
2800.
We have been working with Derek Day, Person County Extension Director in
conjunction with NCSU's Agronomy Department. The consensus is that these levels and
variations are a result of swine sludge being applied to the soil surface in a continuous no -
till conservation program. The recommendation has been made to deep till these fields
and thoroughly mix the soil to even out the mineral levels, through out the plant root -
growing zone.
The soil pH levels also fell below 6 in our last sample, but with a growing crop in the
field, we were unable to immediately apply lime. We are in the process now of
implementing the recommendations of the NCSU Agronomy Department to deep till and
mix the soil and also to apply sufficient lime to raise the pH level back above 6.
We will continue to work with our County Extension Office and the NCSU Agronomy
Department to monitor the levels of copper. I apologize that I was unable to meet with JD
Hester on July 16. 1 had a surgical procedure that had been planned for several months,
and could not reschedule.
Please know that we are committed to finding the proper solution for the elevated
levels of copper. Please contact us if you should have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Timmy Thomas

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
July 28, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Timmy Thomas
Thomas Farms Pork, Inc.
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC, 27583
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Zinc and Copper Indices
Thomas Farms Pork, Inc.
Facility # 73-10
Person County
Dear Mr. Thomas:
On July 16, 2004, Mr. Jarwin (JD) Hester from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
compliance inspection at the subject facility. A review of the February 2, 2004 soil test report
for the following fields indicated Copper indices at or greater than 2000:
Sample id#
23
25
27
28
Crop
Small Grain/Fescue
GL LL cG
LL LL LG
cc iG LL
Conner Value
1971
1776
2083
2110
North Carolina General Statue 143-215.10C(e)(6) states in part "Zinc and Copper levels
in the soils shall be monitored, and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excess levels."
The SB 1217 Interagency Group was established by the General Assembly in 1996 to
interpret requirements of the animal waste management rules. When elevated levels of Copper
and Zinc are reached, Section 1.19 of the Seventh Guidance Memo of the Interagency Group
future manure applications. The guidance memo recommends that producer LL must seek
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh North Carolina 27699
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc,us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Nne
orthCarolina
;Vatmally

Thomas Farm Pork, Inc.
Page-2-
cont.
alternative site for all crops on f elds with Copper and Zinc indices of greater than 2000" and
that a pH be maintained at 6.0 or greater. This office request that all results of any future
requires that, a producer should contact a qualified technical specialist to discuss options for
future manure applications.
Please respond to the Notice, in writing, within 30 days of receipt. This office also
requests that you immediately contact a qualified agronomist to discuss proper soil sampling
procedures and protocols. If you have any questions regarding this notification, please call
Jarwin (JD) Hester at [phone].
Sincerely,
S. mmerman, L.G.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Person County Soil and Water District
Person County Health Department
Ms. Betsy Gerwig, DWSC-RRO
DWQ Enforcement/Compliance Unit
rro file copy .

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Mr. Thomas
8251 O\#ord Rd.
Timberlake, NC 27583
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
t=NVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50UFRCES
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 14. 2003
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summaries
Thomas Farms. Facility #s: 73-2. 73-6, & 73-10
Person County
Dear Mr. Thomas.
On April 28. 2003. Operation Reviews were conducted on the Thomas family hog farms in Person County'. facilit.
numbers: 73-2. 73-6. and 73-10. These Reviews. undertaken in accordance zFith G.S. 143-215.10D. were one of two visits
scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 2003 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct
second site inspections.
During the Reviews. it vvas determined that the freeboard level markers were set pith the crests of the lagoon
spillways. not the low point on the top of the lagoons. This understates your freeboard as the 12 inches required for the
structural freeboard component is present from the crest of the spillways up to the low point on the lagoon tops. The actual
distance from the spillway crest to the low points may be greater than 12 inches. but credit is onl%- given for 12 inches. The
current markers need to be reset to proper elevations. Until markers are reset with the correct start and stop pumping
elevations. 12 inches should be added to even° freeboard level reading to account for the structural freeboard present.
The resulting freeboard level readings taken using these markers need to include the additional 12 inches of
structural freeboard present. Adding the 12 inches to Your recorded freeboard levels has your farms in compliance with
required freeboard levels for the past near. The high freeboard levels reported to DWQ (Division of Water Quality) were
actually below the start pumping elevation. At the request of J D Hester(DWQ), a cony of this letter will be sent to DWQ
personnel in the Raleigh Rezional Office and Non -Discharge Compiiance Enforcement Unit. Keen a couv of this letter
v ith your farm records.
The need to update your WUPs(Waste Utilization Plans to reflect the extended Fescue pumping window was
noted. Robin Watson- your regional NCDA Agronomist- can provide that service to you. He may be contacted at (336)
570-6850 or via email robin.vimtsonta ncmail_net.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review. Please do
not hesitate to call me at 919/57I-1700 ext. 257 if you have any questions. concerns or needadditional information.
Sincerely, /
Margaret (03, refe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Person Soil and Water Conservation District
Ken Schuster, Water Quality Raleigh Regional Supervisor
Steve Lewis, Non -Discharge Compliance Enforcement Unit. Division of Water Quality
DSWC Regional Files
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledl10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Jimmy & Timmy Thomas
Thomas Fanns Pork Inc.
8251 Oxford Road
Timberlake NC 27583
Dear Jimmy & Timmy Thomas:
E
•
1kT1
W'A
A �A��42 �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 73140
tPerson-County2
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
. Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, 1RR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere)
14 Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: RALEIGH Regional Office
Person County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 21, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RUTUTM I REQUESTED
Timmy Thomas
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC 27583
Dear Timmy Thomas:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
Subject: Application No. 73-0010
Additional Information Request
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
Animal Waste Operation
Person County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has received additional information regarding the subject application.
Further information is required before we can continue our review. Please address and submit the following
information by November 20, 1998:
1. Your waste utilization plan appears to be written for a two-year rotation. The summary table on Page
5 and 6 of your revised waste utilization plan shows a huge deficit that is not so if you account for
two year's worth of plan available nitrogen produced on the farm. Please revise the summary table
and show the actual amount of deficit that occurs over the two-year period.
Please note. that all revisions or amendments made to the waste utilization plan (WUP) or a
portion thereof are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical
Specialist before they are submitted for review.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information: All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The
information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before November 20, 1998 or the Division will return
your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to
be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
JR Jo
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Telephone,919-733-5083 FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Timmy Thomas
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
8251 Oxford Rd. cn C
Timberlake NC 27583 �w
� v
Dear Timmy Thomas:
INK
1741 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRGEs
August 31, 1998
Subject: Application No. 73-0010
Additional Information Request
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
Animal Waste Operation
Person County
The Non -Discharge Perm i'lting-Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information s required before we can continue our review. Please address the following
components by September 30, 1998:
1. Please explain in the narrative of operations the two-year crop rotation. Include what will be planted
the first and second years (include application periods for each crop). It is difficult to gather this
information from Table I of the WUP.
2. The WUP states that corn and wheat will be irrigated during the months of Marchand June and
November and March respectively. Why is waste only being applied for these months? The
recommended application months for Corn ranges from March - June and for Wheat, October —
March. Please explain this information in the narrative.
The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) states that the Realistic Yield Expectations (RYE) for Corn is 110
bushels/acre and for wheat is 55 bushels/acre. Referring to the RYE manual issued by the NCSU
Cooperative Extension Service, the yields for Corn and Wheat should be 105 bu/ac. and 50 bu/ac.
respectively. Note that actual yields that are higher than the RYE's listed by the NCSU Coop
Extension may be used for facilities that can document such yields with records that show the
average yield for three out of five years meets or exceeds the actual yield used in the WUP. If this is
not the case, please make the appropriate changes to the WUP to reflect the correct RYE's.
4. Tract 111, Field 2 has corn listed twice with two different acreages. Please explain and/or revise this
information.
5. Include in the narrative, that an additional 10.8 acres has been cleared and explain why.
b. The irrigation parameters listed in your WUP exceed current NRCS recommendations. Irrigation
events are to be listed in the WUP as the maximum application allowable for that soil type from the
time the pumps are turned on until the time they are shut off. The application events listed in your
WUP appear to be out of the Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this
guide have not been adjusted for the application of animal waste. NRCS currently recommends that
total application amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any soil type. If your
application rates need to be adjusted for the application of animal waste, please have your Technical
Specialist revise your WUP to reflect the appropriate application amount per event. If the rates will
remain as written in the plan, please have your Technical Specialist justify the increased application
rate in the narrative of your WUP.
7. Please include a map, pertaining to the irrigation system, illustrating the fields each sprinkler will
- irrigate.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 73-0010
Timmy Thomas
Page 2
All revisions 1 amendments are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical
Specialist before they are submitted for review. Please reference the subject permit application number when
providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my
attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before
September 30, 1998 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C.
2H ,.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Brian E. Mondschein
Environmental Technician
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigfi eiional=Office -Water-Q iality
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 31, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN E PT REQUESTED
Jiimmy& Timmy Thomas
Thomas Farms
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC 27583
Farm Number: 73 - 10
Dear Jimmy & Timmy Thomas:
W'A
4,
•
-NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Thomas Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm
has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification, Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
` es£ --
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Jimmy Thomas
Thomas Farms
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC 27583
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Thomas Farms
Facility ID#: 73-10
Person County
Dear Mr. Thomas:
!•o
[D[—=HNF;Z
RECEP=
WASHINGTON OFFICE
NOV 19 1996
a IL I&
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycuttof our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. ., irector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, N��O
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7b$7 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 5T1. recycled/ I C)ok post -consumer paper

I a
0
F
RECUVED I DENR I DVWQ
AQUjFFR'RRnTFr.TfnN SF710N
�, AR 19 2009
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
4-6-.-1" '�-- '7 3 - IV
Thomas Farms Ne f k
Timmy Thomas
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake, NC 27581
336-364-2633
06-14-2005
This plan has been developed by:
Kim Woods
NCCES-Person County
304 S. Morgan St.
Rm 123
Roxboro, NC 2 75 73
336-599-1195
Jai M.1911
Developer Si ature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
'73 ---rc)
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Si turc (owner) Date
ignature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Tecbnical Sp ialist Signature Date
• 551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Cover Page I
----- -•- ---------•--------------------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
. Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S13
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,724,280 gals/year by a 260
animal Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
6275
Incorporated
10776
Inj ected
11867
hTigated
6820
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
6,820
7289
-469
2,911,591
-187,311
Year 2
6,820
7367
-547
2,942,538
-218,258
n
--------- �----------------- ---- -- - ---"-..--..-..- -- -------------....------ .._-..-.-..-,-- .-.._...--------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
. * Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this soi
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
46imates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the
osphorous Loss Assessment 'Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Tots!
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Ranoval I
(Ibshcre)
Appfial
(lbs/acre)
111
2
1.50
1,50
Unknown
5.3
Appling
Corn, Grain
132 bu.
58
NIA
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
32
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
45 bu.
36
NIA
111
4
3.12
3.12
Unknown
4.9
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
111
5
11.09
11.09
Unknown
5.0
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
i 11
7
3.95
3.95
Unknown
5.2
Appling
Fescue Hay
5.5 Tons
86
NIA
111
8
4.62
4.62
Unknown
4.8
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat,Grain
65 bu.
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
3210
1
6.50
6.50
Unknown
4.9
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
3210
2
2.34
2.34
Unknown
5.0
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
1 65 bu.1
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
1 46 bu,
37
1 NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 33.12 33.12
•
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/1412005
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCs Page 1 of 2

LL,,
Potential LeachingTechnical
Guidance
2
w potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Ater Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Estimate
{!bs/acre ear) .
P Loss Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0.0 to 1.0
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 1.0 to 2.0
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 2.0 to 4.0
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 4.0
> 100
Very. -High
Starter P application only
r1
U
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/14/2005
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCS Page 2 of 2

The A Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization* for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the numb acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic•
period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Canm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res.
¢bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(FirId)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
loop
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
111
2
N/A
Appling
1.50
1,50
Corn, Grain
132 bu.
2/15-6/30
147
147
0
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
H ]
2
N/A
Appling
1.50
1.50
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
9/1-4/30
129
129
0
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Com, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
l50
0
0
brig.
150
59.92
.0.00
186.94
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.40
0.00
97.96
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
brig.
150
59.92
0.00
664.471
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Wheat, Grain
65 bu,
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
Inig.
79
31.40
0.00
348A8
0.00
Ill
7
S13
Appling
3.95
3.95
Fescue Hay
5.5 Tons
811-7/31
244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97,46
0.00
384.98
0.00
11 1
8
S13
jAppling
4.62
4.62
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
Irrig.
150
59.92
0.00
276.81
0.00
l l l
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4,62
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
brig.
79
31.40
0.00
145.05
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
trig.
150
59.92
0.00
389,46
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/14/30
131
0
0
hTig.
79
3L40
0.00
204.07
0.00
3210
2
S13 jAppling
2.34
2.34
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
Irrig.
l50
59.92
0.00
140.20
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2.34
234
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
brig.
7
31.40
0.00
73,47
0.00
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 1 of 3

Waste U>tion Table .Year 1 .
Nitrogen
Comm
Res,
Manure
Liquid
Solid -
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
0bs/A)
PA
ManurcA
Manure
Manure
Manua:
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
Obs/A)
Obs/A)
Obs/A)
1000
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Appbc.
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,911.59
-
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,724.28
Balance, 1000 gallons
187.31
;
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
Balance, tonsMA
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 2 of 3

Waste U4 tion Table -Year 2 s
Tract
Vow
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA -
Nutrient,
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Cantu
Fert,
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient I
Applied
0bs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
squid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
111
2
N/A
Appling
1.50
1.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
175
0
N/A
0
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Wheat, Grain
65 bu-
9/1 4/30
131
0
0
Irrig-
52
20.93
0.00
65.30
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig.
179
71.50
0.00
223.08
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
[Trig.
52
20,93
0.00
232.12
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
brig.
179
71.50
0.00
792.93
0.00
111
7
S13
Appling
3,95
195
Fescue Hay
5.5 Tons
811-7/31
244
0
0
brig.
244
97.46
0.00
384.98
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
brig,
52
20.93
0.00
96.70
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
[trig.
179
71.50
0.00
330.33
0.00
3210
1
S13
jAppling
6.50
6.50
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4130
131
0
0
Irrig.
52
20.93
0.00
136.05
0.00
32I0
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu-
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig.
179
71.50
0.00
464-75
0,00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2.34
2.34
Wheat, Grain
65 bu,
9/1-4130
131
0
p
brig.
52
20.93
0-00
48.98
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2.34
2.34
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu,
411-9/15
179
0
0 1
brig. 1
179
71 5
OA0
16731
0.00
Total Applied,
1000 gallons
2,942.54
Total Produced, I000 gallons
2,724.28
Balance, 1000 gallons
-218-26
Total Applied, tons
w
0.00
Total Produced, tons
f
2
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. 1n the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
.with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
•
0
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
111
4
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
5
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
7
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
8
Appling
0.45
1.0
3210
1
Appling
0.45
1.0
3210
2
Appling
0.45
1.0
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/14/2005 lAF Page 1 of 1

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
. management plan developed for this operation. This table provides an utrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
..
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Fcres
Field
Ill
2
Req'd Nutrients
147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Apr.
Period
1,50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
�A n
" , '
< nri }
7'ig ."s;r: ,
g i
u
WIVIN
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
141
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
132 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
58 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
act
Field
111
2
Req'd Nutrients
129
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
res App.
Period
1.50
9/14/30
Supplied By:
-..'Ja-+Fi�ri•,i`
:7 f.
� .+l.w'�
^J�-. m:lu�ti.S�
�A .�
lAi1s!
3
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
129
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
64 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
LRating
321bslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
111
4
Req'd Nutrientsl
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A
pp• Period
3.1.2
9/1 4/30
Supplied B
pP y
t " `
;zK: "i� f
µ0
"
.ni:lld
Ms "e.r;
4 �. r �„+,'
�raaa"k4�.�t
.r;95r cr
a f , "+
� .t .�� , r":':
ir, r:+5.r is
,�1t'
u3rr ��t:�
'<
�t�"
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
31
1
0
P Removal
Rating
33 ]bs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
Ill
4
Req'd Nutrients
] so
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.12
2/15-6130
Supplied $y:
1'�''lK�'�zr�
;, ;$��c�:
1 +
.'
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
D5 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
I
0
P Removal I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
l
0
046 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page I of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs1A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs1A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs1A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
111
5
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
11.09
2115 b/30
Supplied By;
� i -. •, �;F'
x?..a r }
^ 2 ck
t"�
-_
* �'iJr w
a y ?`r
Ew � lkl
4- , 3 t
r it
m e -a` e
.� �,� y .
" `� . , ,
r �'
W.._
°"
r
S
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
135 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
59 lbslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
01
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
111.
5
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
11.09
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
"+ ;
4r :1 r. Y4
f
CROP
Wheat; Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Feat.
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
131
71
179
161
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
33 Ibslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
161
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
Ill
7
Req'd Nutrients
244
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App,
Period
3.95
8lI-7131
Supplied By:
�r ,�s7.
+r µY a
Sr•
e.i 'r
..i's> c
">
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
5.5 Tons
09-13-04
Manure
244
133
334
30
1
6
1
0
P Removal
Rating
86 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
133
294
30
1
6
1
0
Tract
Field
Ill
8
Req'd Nutrients
150
D
SD
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
4.62
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
�,. - - �
';;t`.. Sz
u ; _. ...
, v ^.a: _.
M:._.
,.. k
,
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comm erci al Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0i
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
135 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
150
82
205
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
155
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
ill
8
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
4.62
9/1-4130
Supplied By:
'7 e�{.F
v�r, ; ; YSvr 1�
V�,,,, , �.
� ,�x�;
,� h � �?: �
� ,;
.��',�; �`
RONNIE
CROP
wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
1 09-13-04
1 Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
33 Ibslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
1 0
71
129
16
1
3
1
0
�946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 2 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A) I
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
6.50
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
R%MR�2
,R.-kif
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Feat.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
33 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
Tract
I Field
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
6.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:�u:5'r
�^. t M°P C
J�?•1. ,y
3,eKp �8 Y-` I r
y00
4 ti� 1 �'. aid'
�1 ',k{ ?�
�l�ry0
IZk "'-_IlE•f'
r .lYk
CROP
Corn, Grain I
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
APPling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
135 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A
PP� Period
2.34
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
PP
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
APPling
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
YE Sample
Date
135 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
59 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
2.34
9/1 4/30
Supplied BY
rti1
J, s'. .fix
♦i
MEMO
NNE#
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
APPling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
33 Ibs/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data,
*946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 3 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(ibs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A.)
Tract
Field
Ill
2
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acre§ A
PP� Period
1.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied $
PP Y•
'�
'], � _i:i
r ! i i�
'isNst�!�A1
FIRM
iG.� v:ln .
d ��i :iSYY i
�'�' WN
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
071
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
45 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
36 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
111
4
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IA
pp. Period
PP
3.12
4/1-9/15
Supplied B
PP Y
i<,i ►sryr.
.c�� ,, ,
k,g„i
6
a Ex�br
�.�
, A.
�'
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
46 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
179
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
Rating
37 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
FRemoval
Tract
Field
111
5
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
I1.09
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:"
°
a}, t,,a dcpx
40142 =�.w�
is",ti3
7+ . 1
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
Date
46 bu,
02-02-04
Manure
179
981
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
Tract
Field
111
8
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
4.62
4/1-9/15
Supplied BY
+. t. yrta
ti� fink,.'
x' ':'jr�TE�a
r f h + ,
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
- 46 bu,
09-13-04
Manure
179
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
37 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
01
98
195
22
1
41
1
0
Tract Field
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres jApp.
Period
6.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
AO'k f
s 4� A.
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
46 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
179
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal Rating
37 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
046 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 4 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR,
2
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(]bs/A)
Mg
(lbs1A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zan
(1bsIA)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
'tract
Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.34
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
?"
Mu I WN
W x
F
4t
CROP
Soybeans, Martured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
01
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
46 bu.
1 09-13-04
Manurel
1791
98
2451
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal Rating
37 lbslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
I _01
981
2451
22
1
1 4
I
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
L'
046 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 611412005 NMR Page 5 of 5

•
•
Waste Utilization Plan Amendment
for Thomas Farms (Allensville Unit) % .3 -- %C'
The owners of this animal operation plan to change the cropping system. The
updated cropping system will be on a 2-year rotation of Corn, Wheat, and double -cropped
Soybeans in all of the fileds in the current plan except for Field 7 on Tract 111. That field
will be in fescue hay year-round. A current Nutrient Management Plan was generated on
the Nutrient Management Software and is attached. Also, a field addition has been made.
Field 10 on Tract 111 is a 3.5 acre field planted in Pines in 1998 on a 7X10 grid to achieve
600-620 trees per acre. Pine trees are not currently in the Nutrient Management Software;
therefore, the numbers for that crop are listed in this narrative. Field 10, the pines, will
utilize 80 pounds of PAN per acre equalling 280 pounds.per year or 560 pounds of PAN
over 2 years. Please see attached correspondance from the NCSU Forestry Department. By
adding the amount of PAN utilized by the pines and the cropping system in the Nutrient
Management Software, the total PAN applied is 7569 in year 1; and 7647 in year 2 for a
total of 15,216 lbs. over a 2 year period. That equals 3,020,031 gallons in year 1; and
3,051,153 in year 2 for a total of 6,071,184 gallons over a 2 year period. The animal
operation produces a total of 6820 pounds of PAN each year for a 2-year total of 13,640
lbs. That equals 2,721,180 gallons for each year for a 2-year total of 5,442,360 gallons.
This indicates a PAN deficit of 749 lbs for year 1; 827 lbs for year 2; for a 2-year total
deficit of 1576. That equals 298,851 gallons for year 1; 329,973 gallons for year 2; for a 2-
year total deficit of 628,824 gallons.
(Lan wner) Date
g a5
(Technic Specilist(s)) to

•
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if.soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis forthese elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Re uired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
111
2
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
1247
None
857
None
111
2
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
t247
None
857
None
111
2
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
1247
None
857
None
111
4
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
4
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
4
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
5
Corn, Grain
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
5
Wheat, Grain
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
5
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
7
Fescue Hay
5.8
0.4
2083
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1606
None
111
8
Corn, Grain
5.8
0.4
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1654
None
111
8
Wheat, Grain
5.8
0.0
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1654
None
111
8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.8
0.0
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1654
None
3210
1
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
1
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
1
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
2
Corn, Grain
5.8
0.4
1776
None
1269
None
3210
2
Wheat, Grain 1
5.8
0.01
1776
None
1269
None
3210
2
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
1 5.8
1 0.01
1776
None
1269
None
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 STV Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
isludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Sludge- Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
37.73
75,46
113.19
ay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
18.87
37.73
56.60
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
35.37
70.75
106.12
0 ---551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Sludge Page 1 of 1

•
•
•
The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and Iess than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name I Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
StartDate. 9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
52
1
2
49
1
3
56
1
4
87
1
5
117
1
6
148
1
7
122
1
8
96
1
9
107
1
10
120
1
11
115
1
12
106
2
1
97
2
2
91
2
3
85
2
4
93
2
5
94
2
6
122
2
7
162
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
154
2
11
129
2
12
101
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
..---------------------------------- ••------------------------------ ----------- ----- ---1;
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Capacity Page 1 of

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding Iess than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
0 ------551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Pale ]

•
•
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surfacers frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
• 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment Iagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
---- - -- ---- -- -- - -- --- ---- ---- - ----- -----..---- --- --....
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: b114/2005 Specification Page 3

•
LJ
0
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------- ----------- -
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page 4

0
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
J& 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbslacre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbslacre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
•------- -- 1-9- --------------------ata----as-----
V--- -ersio--n ---3.1-------------D----ate ---Pr--in
-----d:---- Q-6-1- --4------00---------•--------r-o-P ---ot--e-----a-ge ----1 ---o--f ---2 -----------
559Dbe e25 CNP

The following crop note applies to field(s): 7
0 Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
. 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
0 -------551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-1412005 Cro Note Pa e 2 of 2

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
06-14-2005
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developgd:'by:
I =3 `
Thomas Farms
Timmy Thomas
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake, NC 27583
336-364-2633
Kim Woods
NCCES-Person County
304 S. Morgan St.
Rm 123
Roxboro, NC 2 75 73
336-599-1195
Inj
Developer Si afore
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Own er/Manager/Producer Agreement
. I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Si tore (owner) Date
ignature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: ��p _ - 13-C 5
Technical Sp ialist Signature Date
------------------ ----- .- ._...--------------•---------._._...
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Cover Page 1

0
0
Waste Utilization Plan Amendment
for Thomas Farms (Allensville Unit)
The owners of this animal operation plan to change the cropping system"'The
updated cropping system will be on a 2-year rotation of Corn, Wheat, and double-cro0ped­-­
Soybeans in all of the fileds in the current plan except for Field 7 on Tract 111. That field"-��,
will be in fescue hay year-round. A current Nutrient Management Plan was generated on
the Nutrient Management Software and is attached. Also, a field addition has been made.
Field 10 on Tract 111 is a 3.5 acre field planted in Pines in 1998 on a 7XI0 grid to achieve
600-620 trees per acre. Pine trees are not currently in the Nutrient Management Software;
therefore, the numbers for that crop are listed in this narrative. Field 10, the pines, will
utilize 80 pounds of PAN per acre equalling 280 pounds per year or 560 pounds of PAN
over 2 years. Please see attached correspondance from the NCSU Forestry Department. By
adding the amount of PAN utilized by the pines and the cropping system in the Nutrient
Management Software, the'total PAN applied is 7569 in year 1; and 7647 in year 2 for a
total of 15,216 lbs. over a 2 year period. That equals 3,020,031 gallons in year 1; and
3,051,153 in year 2 for a total of 6,071,184 gallons over a 2 year period. The animal
operation produces a total of 6820 pounds of PAN each year for a 2-year total of 13,640
lbs. That equals 2,721,180 gallons for each year for a 2-year total of 5,442,360 gallons.
This indicates a PAN deficit of 749 lbs for year 1; 827 lbs for year 2; for a 2-year total
deficit of 1576. That equals 298,851 gallons for year 1; 329,973 gallons for year 2; for a 2-
year total deficit of 628,824 gallons.
(Land,Kwner) Date
-7
(TechnicaOSpecilist(s)) 'bate

Subject: Re: Pine Trees
From: Doug Frederick <[e-mail]>
•Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:37:38 -0400
To: [e-mail]
CC: Kimberly D Woods <[e-mail]>
•
•
Kim - Sorry it has taken me a long time to provide some input to your
questions. I agree with Rick and his comments. I have found from
experience that young hardwood trees cannot tolerate hog -waste spraying at
high rates. I have not sprayed pines with hog waste but 100 pounds of PAN on
trees less that 10 years old may cause some burn. I too would suggest you
ask Dr. Lee Allen since he has done a great deal of work with nutrition of
loblolly pine. His email is: lee [e-mail]
Doug
Rick Hamilton wrote:
Hello Kim
An Appling soil is well -drained and aerated, so we won't see accelerated
denitrification like we see on poorly drained sites. My recommendation
would be to not exceed 100 pounds PAN per year. Preferably, I'd like to
see the site rest every third or fourth year, especially until these
trees get a little more age and size. The few folks I know that are
applying to forests are applying to pastures and fields in the growing
season and are using the woods as a dormant season backup. It is OK
legally to apply to forest land year around....
By copy to Doug, I'm asking him to weigh in and give feedback if he has
other inclinations.
Best, rick
Kimberly D Woods wrote:
1 Rick Hamilton wrote:
Hello Kim
I tried to reply to you the other day, but was on wireless and don;t
know if it went out. Doug Frederick is the guru here on hog waste
application to trees. It would be helpful if we knew some information
like the age of the trees, soil type, frequency of application,
number of trees per acre. From that information, we can try to settle
on a PAN application rate.
Best, rick
Kimberly D Woods wrote:
I Dr. Hamilton,
I am the livestock agent in Person Co. I have a swine producer that
wants to add a field of Pine Trees to their Waste Utilization Plan,
to spray swine effluent on these Pines. I have not been able to get
in touch with anyone in the Forestry Dept that can give me an idea
of how much and when the effluent can be applied. Dr. Deanna Osmond
in the Soil Science Dept suggested I contact Dr. Lee Allen, but I
have not been able to reach him. Any help you could provide would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Kim
ir. Hamilton,
The trees were planted in 1998. They were planted on a 7X10 plan so
there should be somewhere around 600-620 trees per acre. The soil
type is Appling. The owners would like to apply as often as possible
throughout the year. That would help maintain a low level in their
lagoon. I realize that application only once a year may be as much as
Pine Trees can tolerate. Any help you can give me would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks, Kim

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
10 following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S13
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,724,280 gals/year by a 260
animal Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
6275
Incorporated
10776
Injected
11867
Irrigated
6820
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied Obs)
FAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
6,820
7289
-469
2,911,591
-187,311
Year 2
6,820
7367
-547
2,942,538
-218,258
•
. Note: In source iD, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this sot
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date .Printed: 06-14-2005 Source Page 1 of I

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
®stimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the
Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each Feld, where available.
4
If field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P
mo Reval
obstacre)
A
Applied
(Ibs/acre)
111
2
1.50
1.50
Unknown
5.3
Appling
Corn, Grain
132 bu.
58
NIA
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
32
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
45 bu.
36
NIA
Ili
4
3.12
3.12
Unknown
4.9
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu,
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
111
5
11.09
11.0
Unknown
5.0
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
111
7
3.95
3.95
Unknown
5.2
Appling
Fescue Hay
5.5 Tons
86
NIA
111
8
4,62
4,62
Unknown
4.8
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
3210
1
6.50
6.50
Unknown
4.9
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu,
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
3210
2
2.34,
2.34
Unknown
5.0
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu,
59
N/A
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 33.12 33,12
•
551946 Database Version 3A Date Printed 6/14/2005
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCs Page 1 of 2

4
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) shoal d be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Estimate
gbs/acrelwar)
P Loss Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0.0 to 1.0
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 1.0 to 2.0
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 2.0 to 4.0
1 51 - 100
1 High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 4.0 1
> 100
1 Very High
Starter P application only
•
r 1
U
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/14/2005
PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

! 0
The WIPUtilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs1A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
111
2
NIA
Appling
1.50
1.50
Com, Grain
132 bu.
2/15-6/30
147
147
0
NIA
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
2
NIA
Appling
1.50
1.50
Wheat, Grain
64 bu. 1
9/14/30
129
129
0
NIA
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
brig.
150
59.92
0.00
186.94
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4130
131
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.40
0.00
97.96
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Com, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
Inig.
150
59.92
0.00
664.47
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/14/30
131
0
0
brig.
79
31.40
0.00
348.18
0.00
111
7
S13
Appling
3.95
3.95
Fescue Hay
5,5 Tons
811-7/31
244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97.46
0.00
384.98
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Com, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
ISO
0
0
Irrig.
150
59.92
0.00
276.81
0.00
ill
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/14/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.40
OX
145.05
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Com, Grain
135 bu.
2115-6/30
150
0
0
brig.
150
59.92
0.00
389.46
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/14/30
131
0
0
brig.
79
31.40
000
204.07
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2,34
2.34
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
Irrig.
150
59.92
0.00
140.20
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2,34
2.34
1Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4130
131
0
0
Irrig.
74
31.40
0.00
73.47
0.00
551946 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 1 of 3

Waste Util n Table
ear l 9
Nitrogen
Comm
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(Ibs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
1000
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total A"
Applied, 1000 gallons
PP g
2,911.5
"'"^'�
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,724.28
�,^
Balance, 1000 gallons
-187.31
-1F-'1 --rNj
Total Applied, tons
..t-sty=,fit
0.00
Total Produced, tons
sus '--_
0.00
Balance, tons
ri
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilgan Tahle
Ward 0
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APpbc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Raid
(Ibs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
pbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOOD
I gal/A
Tons 1
1000 gals
tons
111
2
NIA
Appling
1.50
1.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
175
0
NIA
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
52
20.93
0.00
65.30
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
I79
0
0
brig.
179
71.50
0.00
223.08
0-00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/14/30
131
0
0
Irrig,
52
20.93
0.00
232,12
0.00
111
5
SI3
Appling
11.09
11.09
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig.
179
71.50
0.00
792.93
0.00
i l t
7
S13
Appling
3.95
3,95
Fescue Hay
5.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
244
0
0
]nig.
244
97,46
0,00
384,98
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
52
20.93
0.0
96.70
0.00
III
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig.
179
71,50
0.00
330.33
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6,50
6.50
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
52
20.93
0.00
136.05
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig,
179
71.50
0.00
464.75
0.00
3210
2
S 13
ppling
2.34
2.34
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
52
20.93
0.00
48.98
0.00
3210
2
SI3
Appling
2.34
2.34
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
=Irng-179
7I.50
0.00
167.31
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,942.54
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,724.28',`=s
)'sw
Balance, 1000 gallons
-218.26
,+„z
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 3 of 3

•
•
The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
111
4
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
5
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
7
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
8
Appling
0.45
1.0
3210
1
Appling
0.45
1.0
3210
1 2
jAppling
0.45
1.0
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/14/2005 1AF Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their'required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A) -
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
111
2
Req'd Nutrients
147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
1.50
2115 6/30
Supplied By:
�r�fAY 4'
-?,
i �t rt
__'M[hi• l
�t ,,
�E
♦ ,,
r'F } �, r'
�, f
l4t<-:.; irkY
J aC.
*f''
w 3
t n 71
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comm erci al Fert.
147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
APPling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
132 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbs/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
111
2
Req'd Nutrients
129
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A
PP- Period
I,50
9/1-4/30
Supplied
PP y
3'
'.rz�
,t,
r'Eh
4.'_r" <`
�. , r, `t;
'¢i
l,.r.F . r }
ti si='
, tt., �"
t°rS, ;t
,x �,.l. i s
Y'"
1�.SO
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comm erci a] Fero.
129
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
APPling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
64 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
Rating
32 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract , Field
111
4
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
3.12
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
3^
r{` '
y' �+r °,
f
�
't 1
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
te
65 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
0g33
F
lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
111
4
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
od
3.12
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
Lary`.
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
APPling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
135 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
31
1
0
P Removal
IRating 159
lbslac. lunknown
BALANCE 1
01
821
205
I8
1
3
1
0
49946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page I of 5

D
i
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
I
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
111
5
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres lApp.
Period
11.09
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
'U
135 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
11
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
Tract I Field
0
111
5
Req'd Nutrients
1311
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres jApp. Period
11.09
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
rdS
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
1 Rating
33 lbs/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
Tract
I Field
111
7
Req'd Nutrients
244
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.95
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
o
—.5
.
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
APPling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
5.5 Tons
09-13-04
Manure
244
133
334
30
1
61
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
86 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
133
294
30
1
6
1
0
Tract
I Field
111
8
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
50
0.
0
0
0
0
Acres [App.
Period
4.62
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
01
0
01
0
Comm erci al Fert.
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
135 bu.
09-13-.04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0,
82
155
18
1
3
1
0
Tract I Field
111
8
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
50
0
0
0.
0
0
Acres jApp. Period
4.62
911-4/30
Supplied By:
R
CROP
Wheat Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
ol
01
ol
01
oi
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
I
09-13-04
Manure
1311
71 1
179
161
11
31
1 1
P Removal I Rating
33 lbs/ac.
Unknown I
BALANCE
-
0
711
129
161
1 1
31
1 1
046 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 2 of 5

10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
r-
L
YEAR
I
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
zn
(IWA)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
T77e I d
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�AcmsApp. Period
6.50
911-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
G
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comm erci a] Fert. 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
RYE
Date
65 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
31
1
0
P Removal Rating
- mo
33 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
Tract
T Tract
I Field
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App.
Period
6.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
RYE
Date
135 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
150
82
205
is
1
3
1
0
P
I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
92
205
18
1
3
1
Q,
T t
Tract
I Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
01
0
App. Period
2,34
2115-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
RYE I Sample
Date
135 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
150
82
205
is
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
821
205
18
1
3
1
0
Tract I Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
234
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
G
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
lUnknown
09-13-04
Manure
131
71,
179,
161
1
31
1
P Removal
I Rating
33 lbs/ac.
I
BALANCE
0
711
1791
161
11
31
1 1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
101946 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 3 of 5

r-
L
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tonslA)
Tract
Tract
Field
111
2
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AcresApp.
Period
1.50
L4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
�rl.�,��,�ll,�,'�l.i-�'.�-..-.,..",l";i��,
V
-A"
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
ol
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE j Sample Date
45 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
01
Removal r
P Removal
I Rating
36 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Tract
Field
MMMMMMM
111
4
Req'd Nutrients
1791
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
Acres .s
Acres App.
Period
3.12
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
Ro5
7 E
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0-
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
RYE I Sample Date
RY
46 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
179
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
37 lbs/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
Tract
I Field
111
5
Req'd Nutrients
179
0:
0
ol
0
0
01
0
Acres JApp,
Period
1 1.09
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
.j YZ
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
46 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
179
981
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
981
245
22
1
4
1
0
Tract
I Field
M
111
8
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
50
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.62
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample
RYE RYE I Sample
Date
46 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
179
98
245.
22
1 1
4
1
01
Remov
P Removal
I Rating
37 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
1 0
98
195
22
11
4
1
0
Tract
Tract
I Field
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
A
App.
Period
6.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series lAppling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
46 bu. 09-13-04
Manure
179
98
245
22
1
4
1
PR.,,val
I Ratingl
37 lbs/ac. lUnknown I
BALANCE
- 01
98
245
22
11
4
11
•946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 4 of .5

CJ
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR R
FTract
2
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres lApp.
Period
2.34
1 4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
[Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
1 46 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
l 1791
981
245
22
1
4
1
01
P Removal
I Rating[
37lbs/ac.
lUnknown
I BALANCE
1 01
981
2451
22
l
4
1
0
1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
0
046 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 5 of 5

•
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soi I sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Re uired Soil Test Value
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tonslacre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
111
2
Com, Grain
6.0
0.0
1247
None
857
None
111
2
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
1247
None
S57
None
111
2
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
1247
None
857
None
111
4
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
4
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
4
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
11
5
Com, Grain
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
5
Wheat, Grain
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
5
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
7
Fescue Hay
5.8
OA
2083
Caution. Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1606
None
111
8
Com, Grain
5.8
0.4
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0,
1654
None
111
8
Wheat, Grain
5.8
0.0
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain EH at 6.0.
1654
None
111
8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.8
0.0
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible, Maintain pH at 6.0.
1654
None
3210
1
Com, Grain
6.0
0.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
1
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
1
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
2
Corn, Grain
5.8
0.4
1776
None
1269
None
3210
2
Wheat, Grain
5.8
0.01
1776
None
1269
None
3210
2
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.8
0.01
1776
1 None
1269
1 None
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- --- ----
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 STV Page 1 of 1

r
The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated fortheir suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is notpossible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PAN Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Sludge'- Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
37.73
75.46
113.19
Hay 6 ton R.Y.B.
300
26.32
18.87
37.73
56.60
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
35.37
70.75
106.12
-- -------------------------------••------...-------..-..--------•-----------...----------------------------•------ -----•------------•----------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Sludge Page I of 1

• The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is'defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
•
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
I Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
52
1
2
49
1
3
56
1
4
87
I
5
117
1
6
148
1
7
122
1
8
96
1
9
107
1
10
120
1
11
115
1
12
106
2
1
97
2
2
91
2
3
85
2
4
93
2
5
94
2
6
122
2
7
162
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
154
2
11
129
2
12
101
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
•-------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Capacity Page I of I

i Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate Iand to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
• data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
0
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
------------------------------------------------------ ---......-----------------------------.--
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 6/14/2005 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
• the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ---------------------- - - -- -- ---------------------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page'2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, Ieakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
-------------------------------------------------------------- I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page 3

0
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------- - ------ ------------ ----------------------- ------------ ----------- I ------------ ----------------------------------- -----
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page 4

n
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 23 41 5, 8
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): I, 2, 4, 5, 8
Wheat; Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
M 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbs/acre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
---------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------------------------------------- -----.--------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 CropNote Page I of 2

0 The following crop note applies to field(s): 7
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
. 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
-------------------------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

•
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:
By:
Farm ; Tract:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES
Your nutrient management/waste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
Date:--_f;_ l_
To utilize agricultural wastes for
livestock feed or as an energy source.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT / WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this Job
Sheet and the attachments meet the
minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
purposes. This Nutrient Management
Plan includes:
1 A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan).
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
or resources (streams, wells,
sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
3. Your planned crop rotation.
4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
Index (LI) as required.
6. Realistic yield expectations for the
crops in the rotation, and their source
if other than default values approved
for N.C.
7. Recommended nutrient application
rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice .lob Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page 1

•
•
F
and method of application and
incorporation, if applicable.
This Job Sheet (or comparable
information), that provides the following:
• General requirements of this practice,
as well as additional requirements to
meet the natural resource protection
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to
this plan.
• Operation and maintenance
information associated with this
practice.
Because this Nutrient Management Plan
includes agricultural organic sources,
additional items are required in the plan to
ensure proper waste utilization:
Waste Utilization Agreement (if
applicable)
Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement (if applicable)
• Additional engineering design and
operating information for waste storage
structures, transport, and application
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent
overtopping or other discharges from
storage structures or facilities, as
applicable.
This plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal,
state, or local regulations or policies.
Changes in laws or regulations may
necessitate a revision of the plan.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
UTILIZATION
General
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management
• plan (see the following section, "BASIC
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT")
You are required to acquire and comply
with all federal, state, or local permit
requirements related to the handling and
application of manure or organic
materials.
The nutrient management/waste
utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement must exist to address all
organic waste not handled by the nutrient
management/waste utilization plan.
Manure or organic wastes will not be
applied to the following areas:
• surface waters,
• wetlands, unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment
system,
• soils subject to frequent flooding
during the period when flooding is
expected,
• : frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other
than those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
• within 25 feet of surface waters, or
• within any other setbacks as identified
by federal, state, or local laws or
regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
being applied within 75 feet of a
residential property boundary or
perennial stream or river if the facility
was sited on or after October 1995.)
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
in a manner not to reach surface waters,
wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
Siudge.that accumulates in waste storage
structures must be analyzed prior to land
Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available
The realistic yield expectations (RYES) in
land and/or third party manure agreements)
this plan are based on one or more of the
.
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in
following:
adherence to all nutrient application
Default values approved by the N.C.
requirements. All federal and state guidance
Interagency Nutrient Management
regarding the proper testing, handling,
Committee that incorporate soil
planning, and application of sludge must be
productivity information, yield data,
followed for regulated operations.
and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Since compliance with all applicable North
Additional information on the default
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the
values may be found at:
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for
www,soil.ncsu.edu/nmWncnmwalindex.htm
implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste
-• Documented actual yield data from
Management for questions.
the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
consecutive specific crop harvests.
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED
(For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other
the last five years.)
organic residues used for feedstock must be
4 A fertilization rate recommended by
handled in a manner to minimize
North Carolina State University may
contamination and preserve its feed value.
be used in cases where no yield data
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be
or approved RYE values exist for a
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall
crop.
•
develop rations that utilize animal wastes.
. An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
chemical features may be used for
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY
new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
If your facility is to be used for energy
ONLY be specified by a certified
production, all energy producing components
Nutrient Management planner.
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and
Erosion, runoff, and water management
provisions for the utilization of residues of
controls have been planned, as needed,
energy production identified. Your Nutrient
on fields that receive nutrients.
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable.
Soil Testing
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
This nutrient management plan has been
MANAGEMENT
developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
General
Soil samples must be -collected and
Application of nutrients must comply with all
prepared in accordance with North
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and
Carolina State University or the North
regulations.
Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheen NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
Growers who utilize other laboratories must
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology
to ensure the test results are compatible with
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide
consistency, all laboratories used must
provide fertilization recommendations using
guidelines and methodologies as referenced
at the NCDA&CS website:
www.ncagr.cornla-gronomilobook.htm
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory
that is supported by field research within the
state.
Soil testing shall include analysis for all
nutrients for which specific information is
• needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Plant Tissue Testing
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall
be done in accordance with North Carolina
State University or NCDA&CS standards or
recommendations.
Manure Testing
Nutrient values of manure and organic by-
products shall be established for planning
purposes based on laboratory analysis,
acceptable default values, or historic records
for the operation.
When determining actual application rates, a
laboratory analysis is required. State
regulations require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year.
Acceptable laboratories include the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
certified by the NCDENR.
Field Risk Assessment
A field -specific assessment of the
potential for phosphorus transport from
each field (or groups of similar fields)
have been conducted, using the North
Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT)
PLAT assesses the potential for
phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
site to surface water through each of the
four primary loss pathways:
• sediment -bound P transported
through erosion,
• soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
• soluble P leached through the soil
profile, and
• non -incorporated source P
transported through surface
runoff.
Based on the assessment of each loss
pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
rating will identify whether nitrogen or
phosphorus shall be the rate -determining
element in developing the planned
application rate for manure.
PLAT Rating
I Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW
Nitrogen -based manure
application,
MEDIUM
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
HIGH
Manure application limited to -
phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
VERY HIGH
No additional manure
application to be specified in
plan for the site.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with NCSU
guidelines or recommendations.
Page 4
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)

In some cases, specific conservation practices
that reduce the potential for phosphorus
• transport have been incorporated. into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips,
ponds, water table management, and residue
management and conservation tillage.
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or
planned, have been incorporated into your
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the
management of the site actually affects the
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the
PLAT analysis (including any required to
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient
Management Plan to be approved.
Nutrient Application Rates
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider
current soil test results, RYEs, and
management.
• Liming material shall be applied as needed to
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients.
•
The application amount and rate (inlhr) for
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation)
shall not result in runoff from the site. The
application shall not exceed the field capacity
of the soil.
The planned rates of nutrient application are
shown on the attached sheets. These rates
have been computed as follows:
Nitrogen Application - When the plan is
nitrogen -based (a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium), the application rate of manure or
organic by-products shall be based on the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops
without established RYEs). This may
result in an application rate for other
nutrients that exceeds the soil test
recommendation.
When the plan is being implemented
on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
rating of High or Very High), manure
or other organic by-products shall be
applied at rates consistent with the
phosphorus application guidance
below. In such situations, an
additional nitrogen application from
non -organic sources may be required
to supply nitrogen at the rate
recommended by the RYE.
• Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
All nitrogen rates for hay production
are for pure grass stands. Due to the
nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
by 25% for the portion of the expected
yield that is removed through grazing.
Phosphorus Application — When
manure or other organic by-products
are used, the planned rates of
phosphorus application shall be based
on the PLAT rating for the site, as
follows:
Low or Medium Rating — The
planned manure or organic by-
product application rate is based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
High Rating_ — The planned
manure or organic by-product
application rate is limited to the
phosphorus removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass.
VM-High Rating — No additional
manure or organic by-product
application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 5

0
•
•
•
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be
recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or
recommendations.
A single application of phosphorus applied
as manure or organic by-product may be
made at a rate equal to the recommended
phosphorus application or estimated
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple
years in the crop sequence.
• When such single applications are
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen
removal in harvested plant bio-
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating.
Potassium Application — Planned
potassium application rates should
match the soil test recommended rates
as closely as possible. (This is
particularly critical in situations where a
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or
other organic sources, the addition of
potassium from non -organic sources
may be required.
Other Plant Nutrients - The planned
rates of application of other nutrients if
applicable are consistent with North
Carolina State University or the
NCDA&CS guidelines or
recommendations.
Nutrient Application Timing
Timing of nutrient application shall
correspond as closely as possible with
plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
considering cropping system limitations,
weather and climatic conditions, and field
accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
saturated soil.
Manure or organic by-products shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
For nutrients applied through irrigation
systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
distribution of material at planned rates.
Plan Review and Revision Period
A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
to exceed five years.
Heavy Metals Monitoring
For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
and copper concentrations shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites for
application shall be sought when these
metals approach excessive
concentrations. The following criteria and
actions are provided:
Mehlich-3Index
Action
zn-1
300 (21 Ibs/ac)
Peanuts are very sensitive to
zinc, and application on peanuts
should be limited. Seek
alternative sites when possible.
The risk of zinc toxicity is
greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-I as low as
300. '
600 (35 Ibs/ac)
Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts. '
2,000 (142
Caution: Seek alternative sites
lbs/ac)
when possible for all crops. '
3,000 (213
Critical toxic level for all crops.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page 6

•
•
Mehlich-3Index
Action
LgL-u
2,000 (72 Ibs/ac)
Caution: Seek alternative sites
when possible for,all crops.'
3,000 (108
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibs/ac)
Cease application on all crops.'
' Maintain pH at 6.0 on these
When sewage sludge is applied, the
accumulation of potential pollutants (including
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state
and local laws or regulations. Additional
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage
sludge may be found in Land Application of
Sewage Sludge, EPA/831-B-93-002b
publication number at:
hi`ta://www.epa. qov/t:npdes/pubalsludgejo
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER
In areas that have been identified as impaired
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from the site. (The streams/water
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA-
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section
1.)
❑ NO
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in
an area where surface waters are
impaired, with agricultural nutrients
identified as a likely source. The Leaching
Index (LI) is not required.
❑ YES
This nutrient management plan IS in an
area where surface waters are impaired,
with agricultural nutrients identified as a
likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
is included in this plan.
While the results of the LI does not affect
your planned nutrient application rates,
some additional conservation practices
may be specified in the plan to reduce the
risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
applicable.
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
soluble elements and either or both may
be components of organic and inorganic
fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
move with water as leachate down
through the soil, or over the soil surface
as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
phosphorus exist in different forms and
may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
can have detrimental effects on both
surface and shallow ground water quality.
As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
severe algal blooms and fish kills.
Because of the topography, hydrology,
and other factors in the state, the
environmental problems from excess
nutrients reaching surface water may not
be exhibited near the contributing source,
but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico Basin,
the Chowan River, the watershed of the
B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
watershed of the New River in Onslow
County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
waters in North Carolina.
Nitrogen. Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
water and eventually to surface waters.
(Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan
are needed. (The S.B. 1217
in some areas of the state with surface water
interagency group guidelines
.
impairments. The LI uses soils information
accepted by the N.C. Division of
and local climate data to assess the potential
Water Quality for .0200 operations
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results
specify a plan revision when there are
of the LI analysis and recommended actions
changes in crops or cropping pattems
are included in your nutrient management
that utilize more than 25 percent of
plan, if applicable.
the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades
management plans shall be
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus
thoroughly reviewed every five years
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be
and revised if necessary. The next
transported off -site than recognized in the
review will be performed in
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble
2.
Protect fertilizer and organic by -
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3)
product storage facilities from weather
in soluble form leaching downward through
and accidental leakage or spillage.
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely
3.
Ensure proper calibration of
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by
application equipment to ensure
site, and depends upon such factors as soil
uniform distribution of material at
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of
planned rates.
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors,
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess
4.
Inspect and maintain the equipment
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The
results of the PLAT analysis and
and facilities used to implement the
Nutrient Management/Waste
recommended actions are included in your
Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based
5.
Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed.
applicable, annually.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that
6.
Records should be maintained for five
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus
years, or for a period as required by
removal rate. In these cases, the planned
other Federal, state, or local
nutrient application rate is not sustainable,
ordinances, or program or contract
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be
requirements. To ensure adequate
reached.
information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
included:
You are responsible for safe operation and
• Soil test results and
recommendations for nutrient
maintenance of this practice, including all
application,
equipment. The following Operation &
Quantities, analyses and sources
Maintenance should be conducted:
of nutrients applied (When the
1 Review the plan annually to determine if
actual rates used exceed the
recommended and planned rates
•
adjustments or modifications to the plan
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
• Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
• Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record -keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
• nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
0
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 9

ANIMAL '.WASTE .,UTILIZATION' 'PLAN.
Producer: Jimmy &Timmy,Thomas
Location: 8251-Oxford , Rd.
Timberlake, ;-NC :27581 ;R �,srtafi
Telephone; -364 -2 633i'':v��171
Type Operation: Existing Farrow,,to- Finish" Swine:.. ;
� a - 5
Number - of Animals: F 2 60.0.0..• sows
{Design capacity}
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: ;Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be 1and.applied at a
specified rate to,prevent pollution,of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant4nutrients,,.in the animal waste should,be -used
to reduce, the �:amounti,of� commerc; .a1 ,fer;til'izer ,requi red -for the crops
in{ the , fields;,where -,�thec,,was,te is 1 o be LaPpliedG
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutTien
Wast"e',�should"hbe�,anal� ,zed before��each ap lication,,,c ,cle'.,..,,,Annual_ soil
. Y - V s _ p ,,.«ate `" a . '.t 4 ,4, .A , «, r L:x -8 Y.7 �:. '{
tests '''areC strohg1y. encouraged,so.s.that all pklant, nutra�entsF cansFbe
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to &e_x.grv,wn.,,,o
Several'factors.are important in,implementing,;:your�wa,ste;utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of th,e waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally sa€e.manner: ,,
1.'° Always apply waste.based:on.the.needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the=crop can utilize.. ,
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water;'holdi.ng capacities. ,
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding"at°le'ssSthan
5 tons:per acre:per year. Waste may belapplied,to,land
eroding at 5 or•.,,more tons per acre annually,, _but: �.Zess than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
` . under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

'ANIMAL -WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN,
0)
5.- wind conditions should also be considered`z,to avoid drift and
:
downwind odor problems'::_ T L
6. To maximize the value`'dfE,�,the` nutrients .for crop production
and to reduce-tkepotent"ial`for,'pollution, the waste should
be applied, toy a .growing „crop or': applied , not more than 30
days prorro'� planting=a'crop' ar::.forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting -the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce''"odor:.problernsa, ; c .; ., e4
This plan is based on the waste application method:shown.,�above_;._,If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need tor:reyise-.this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
k
The estimated acres needed to apply,the'animal waste.is,,based,.on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.- In some cases you -may want to have.plant
analysis made, ' whidh- could -allow additional •waste ;to be applied.
Provisions shall' be, made for the �area,receivinga.waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing 'waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to mai:ntaim pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production,..
This' waste' utilization plan,- :1f carried out, meets the ,requirements,
for compliance with 15A NCAC 12H `: 0217 adopted Tby the sEnvironmental
Management Commiss`ion .
AMOUNT OF -WASTE"` PRODUCED`` PER YEAR (gallons; , ft3, ,tons, etc. )
260 sows 'x 19.'9 tons'waste/sows/year,;= 5174' tons-
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILASLE'NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
260 sows x 26 labs PAN/sows/year = 6760 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job: You -should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop'to•be'grown, soil type and surface application..
• .� ."'. .;:Gad; .. t.
oil
Page: 2

•
CAMP WC:ubic Arne
Tm+ cling Gvn C—Putzl�--21 LL -kshcc 2-20-99
Hard Hose Traveling Gun S; stem
COMPUTATIONAL V0RKSHEET
11
1. Farm Number (Identification) .r 73_ o Field Number (Identification) 1 2 -3
2. Irrigation System Designation ✓ Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes _ m Exterior Lanes �lfeet] Length of puU(LI)
P, Interior Lanes Exterior Lanes � [feet) Length of puil(L2)
Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _____—ifeet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted Diameter -3 0-0 -f feet] Frorn field data sheet
5. Spacing ;2g =Hydrant Spacing [feet] 4!77.. [as percent of wetted diameter3
6. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on nattern_ soacin2. and travel lane location. 1
sA, �a
sf�, F�a !�� d�lrc Pori, en E�7 T.
II 4 c".
,��� �X/ f�n4 ia}�b2 14r�ex LLP��-rh�CW�d ��+)�y�Sbo.-/9rrps f�c�cs
i
3, �I
[aga)(;L00)1y.?sL.O = A
/613 14 SL 0, / 7
3
L—��.
0. 5'B
(79J(� ooJ�lf3.�6o ` 3. �aZ
T. (O-�
E 90
0. Y3
�76-1062.*)kJ�- � ssY
o,3�
�P
��-6S
0 7
y�(.zWSJfy3S�� = �,.�s
as
a.s�
0. a$
p00) C/ 7s) lv�;s� o Z
0.4-�
(3 �C
13,3
67
(1 aso)Y- r, = 1 /0
O..5-f
' z-7
13,
oo
I
L/,
t,
�w {
�c r-es
i

U
V
Your waste utilization plan appears to be written for a two-year rotation. The summary table on Page 5 and
6 of your revised waste utilization plan shows a. hugh deficit that is not so if you account for two year's
worth of plan available nitrogen produced on the farm. Please revise the' mmary table and show the
actual amount of deficit that occurs over the two-year period.
As you can see from the tables below, calculations were made for the total amount of PAN produced
according to RYE. The tables show the two year rotation with the various crops (corn -wheat -fescue hay in that order)
being planted. Actual volume planned to be pumped equals 222,776 cu. ft. and the required volume to be pumped
is 201,209 cu. ft. Therefore, 201,209 cu. ft. x 7.48 gal/cu. ft. = 1,505,043.32 gallons. According to the NCDA waste
analysis report (VW1043 W) a total of 2.1 lbs. of nitrogen per 1000 gallons of swine lagoon liquid pumped. Therefore,
1,505 x 2.1 lbs./1000 gallons = 3,160.50 lbs. PAN for six months storage. For one year storage 3,160,50 x 2 = 6,321
Ibs.tyr. Therefore, 6,321 lbs. of nitrogen produced per year for this facility according to the current waste analysis
report. Therefore, 6760 lbs. of actual PAN needed is more than the 6, 321 lbs. of nitrogen actually applied from the
waste analysis data. Also, once a vegetation is established on the additional 8,149 acres cleared, this will be
amended to the WUP as available crop land for waste application.
I hope this helps explain your question concerning the Thomas Farms (Allensville Unit) swine operation. If
you have any questions contact Joey Knight with NCCES or Jim Huey with NRCS. Thanks.
Thomas Farms Allensville Unit
Amendment to WUP
Application No. 73-0010
Total PANIyr - 6760
CORN - March - June
(1st Year Spring)
Tract
Field
# / PAN
T111
"
605
4
399
5
1499
7
756
8
701
T3210
1
866
2
454
3
110
Additional acreage that was cleared that was not included
in calculations
TOTAL
5390
5390 # (PAN used on Spring Corn crop) + 1370 # (PAN! used on Fall Wheat crop) = 6760 # (1st year
PAN)

WHEAT - October - March
(use 1370 in Fall) (1st year Fall)
(use remainder 3806 in next Spring) (2nd year Sprin6l),
Tract
Field
# / PAN
T111
2
581
4
383
5
1439
7
726
8
673
T3210
1
832
2
436
3
106
Additional acreage that was cleared that was not included
in calculations
Total
5176
FHH - August - October
(use in Fail after Wheat) (2nd Year Fall)
Tract
Field
# 1 PAN
T111
2
440
4
290 .
5
1090
7
550
8
510
T3210
1
630
2
330
3
80
Additional acreage that was cleared that was not included in
calculations
TOTAL
3920
Used in Fall after Wheat 3920 # PAN therefore, 6760 # - 6726 # = 34 # short
(Lando er) Achnicalpecialist) (s) (Date)
n

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
ill
2
ApB
C
110
137.5
1.5
467.5
I
MAR-JUN
111
14
jApB
IC
1110
1137.5
111
5
ApB
IC
T
1110
1137.5
ill
7
ApB
IC
T
1110
1137.5
8
ApB
IC
4
I
1110
1137.5
3210
1
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
3210
2
ApB
IC
1110
1137.5
I
ill
ApB
1-2
JW
I
155
1132
ill
ApB
FHH
2
1-2
I
1100
ill
ApB
1-4
JW
T
155
1132
ill
ApB
FHH
1-4
I
12.0
1100
ill
ApB
1-5
JW
T
155
1132
ill
"5
ApB
FHH
I
�2.0 Too
iqri
1-7
ApB
I W
155
1132
I
C
13.12 1398.75
MAR-JUN
11.09 1498.75
MAR-JUN
3.95 1756.25
MAR-JUN
4.62 701.25
1M.A.R-JUN
6.5 �852.5
MAR-JUN
2.34 1 453.75
MAR-JUN
1.5 1448.8
OCT-MAR
2.9 1340
AUG-OCT
3.12 1382.8
OCT-MAR
3.12 1290
AUG-OCT
11.09 1438.8
OCT-MAR
11.09 1090
AUG-OCT -
3.95 1726
OCT-MAR

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
111
1-7
1ApB
FHH
12. 6
1.100 I
3.95
I
1550
AUGOCT
111
ApB
4.62
673.2
1-8
1
jW
I
155-
1132 1
OCT-MAR
111
1-8
1 ApB
FHH
12.0
1100
14-62
1510
I
AUG-OCT
32'10
ApB
W
1-1
I I
155
1132 1
16.5
1818.4
OCT-MAR
3210
ApB
FHH
2
620
1-1
1
I
1100 1
16.5
AUG-OCT
3210
ApB
W
55
5.6
1-2
1
I I
1132 1
12.34
143
OCT-MAR
3210
ApB
FHH
2.34
1-2
1
I
12.0
1100
1330
AUG-OCT
.4
ApB
FHH
4
200
12a
I
I
1 1
11.5
1300
AUG-
OCT, Mid
FE
IEND I= I I I f
TOTALI14082.3
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to'have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
•

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
•
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
.- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
r
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
C
CORN
BU
1.25
FHH
FESCUE - HAY
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BU
2.4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LES AW N USED
TABLE 1 34.62 14082.35

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN
•
TABLE 2 0
TOTAL 34.62
*** BALANCE
0
14082.35
-7322.35
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
U
•

•
•
6. The irrigation parameters listed in your WUP exceed current NRCS
recommendations. The application events listed in your,WUP appear to be out
of the Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this guide
have not been adjusted for the application of animal rn�aste, NRCS currently
recommends that total application amounts not exceed one inch in any application
event for any soil type. If your application rates need to be adjusted for the
application of animal waste, please have your Technical Specialist revise your
WUP to reflect the appropriate application amount per event. If the rates will
remain as written in the plan, please have your Technical Specialist justify the
increased application rate in the narrative of your WUP.
All changes have been made in the newly revised WUP. WUP is attached.
(Landowner)
(Date)
NcCES)
nieal Speciali t)(s)
I
(Date)
-s$
�'-22 S6

5. Include in the narrative, that an additional 10.8 acres has been cleared and
explain why.
This additional acreage was cleared in order to make waste applications more
efficient and easier for the traveling irrigation system. To be exact, all fields were
remeasured by the Extension Agent with the acreage wheel and a total of 39.349
acres can be used for waste applications. This allows an additional 8.149 acres
for waste application. Refer to the new map drawn instead of the old ASCS map
for new field acreages and boundaries. look at the dimensions of the fields on .
the irrigation layouts on each field. The new field maps are attached. Note the
new field boundaries because of the clearing of trees. This clearing has given
the farm this additional crop land to apply their swine waste.
•
hinic Specialist}(s)
(Lan owner)
(Date)
(Date)

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: Date:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
W
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION -PLAN',;,!
,5
l
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in'order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1118 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5590
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 18.6333333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 44.72 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
�. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION•PLAN--
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make thit plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Application Rate
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
(in/-hr)
ill
2
ApB
C
.45
ill
4
ApB
C
.45
ill
5
ApB
C
.45
ill
7
ApB
C
.45
ill
S
ApB
C
.45
111
"2
ApB
FHH
.45
ill
"2
ApB
W
.45
111
"4
ApB
FHH
.45
ill
"4
ApB
W
.45
111 .
7 S
ApB
FHH
.45
i
111
ApB
W
.45
ill
�7
ApB
FHH
.45
ill
ApB
W
.45
111
"8
ApB
FHH
.45
ill
ApB
W
.45
3210
1
ApB
C
.45
3210
2
ApB
C
.45
3210
3
ApB
C
.45
3210
"1
ApB
FHH
.45
3210
ApB
W
.45
3210
2
ApB
FHH
.45
Applic. Amount
(inches)
*1.0
*1.0 .
* 1 ..o
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*l.o
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3210 I "2
3210 1 "3
3210 -3
d.:
ApB
APB
W
FHH
R,
t
1 .
.45
.45
.45
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for I80.00 days of temporary storage and'the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables I and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This operation consists of 1 retrofitted lagoon designed for a 260 sow farrow to
finish operation. There is one abandoned lagoon on site that is planned to be
closed out in 1998. Cost -share has been approved for the closure and a waste
utilization plan will be followed. Until the lagoon is closed, the operator must
maintain the water level from going above the 25 year/1 day storm pump stake.
The operator should also never allow the water level in the retrofitted lagoon
to go above the start pmp stake. Also, always stop waste application immediately
should runoff occur. During construction of retrofitted lagoon, a small
underground stream was hit when cutting the core. A 4" perforated plastic pipe
(with gravel & geotextile cloth) was laid starting at the core and extending
beyond the back toe of the dam. The outlet of this pipe should be protected from
clogging to prevent water from backing up into pipe. The.fields receiving waste
are under a 2 year rotation of 1 year no -Milled corn followed by 2nd year of
*t interseeded with fescue.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS;
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. 'Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 1.0 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter'Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively, growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN .';
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in -fall 6r winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be.applied closer than 20.0 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
t
14. Waste shall be applied in a.manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a -manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17.. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

..WASTE-, UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
i�
ti
18. If animal production at the facility is to be' suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
1.9. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
Pe inspected an a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used ina rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 50 days of utilization and soil N
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall.be used.when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for. five ( 5 ) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
•
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
0
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Thomas Farms
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Jimmy & Timmy Thomas
(Please print)
Signature:� ate:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Jim Huey
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-597-2973
Address (Agency): 304 S. Morgan St. Rm 126
Roxboro NC 27573
Signature: Date: 7
•
Page: 15

�G 73 - /a
i�� says Add-k -�,c-
ly 5
OceJ.v�r�
1Y
C.
0

f. Pr..LO RaOe•4. „♦+•a J I —w W.W.D ■. W q mmo •. aor,♦.
PLAT OF SURVEY I
JIMMY THOMA5 I �.�,:,.� ' �.�. •.� M �. I-.�
I 1
TIMMY THOMAS-
17r.7.• .�
ALLENSVILLE TITP. , PERSON COUNTY. N-C. ,�c;5 — !`
NOVEWBER 1994. HAULETT-JENNINGS A ASSOCIATES
JOHN J. JENNINGS L-3052DO
+ I
I
• t'! � �, v� �'1 icei`,,
- I P!-ve. /.Aw
K f
i 1 ti
L.
J. DWYIY .ffffS-4A
•0 �J -- --
� 1, n
I lM 0•. ip. r. W
Z
vrcrr+rrY MAP
V kOD•!t .. .OIT"
V
tr
I f. DP•aD sew►♦w �, � . 1 f .. ` I,oe•n's.•! Iu Hl.I]' •pr•,i•. �!
107. 19 ACRES
! { I 11ulYr Y. f r
*JN IF / 0 1� 1 b
4f sl. ar
1 m•y•71.9 I f1~1 Y
'.� ' r 113.76• _
ti I w, nalY,e taw
% _•1• f IF 3 ` •. ` — y Ir I
„0n•tt'i7.1 ol.1rl,D
. r.ai, L[O
f J f;'t '�r7 • —, / — rf • NAIL FOUNDr . Y L NS0 NAIL SET
1i o IRON WET
S 7. vs,r IIPORY, J.. W 0 WA In(YATICAL
d - 31 1
.> r n _ -
1]i1,7�• 1aal7A 1, IYwA. fJ.W ro WXQ0K Tf„1 f/ .
�✓ Is 1 lOj 1 ♦ i/ 011 'Cb1Y[TAYCa.'• ~'7 NI tLV01tI W. 4iti
fv Yc.r. r.a. YtEPSYEM LAM wfM>ufe
CR��k MACKTIC 717 S-L.N.✓< ST. - r_0.001 17AA
R=PoN0 ,btM CAACl114 IT03
(110) 7i0-4743

PLAT OF SURVEY
J- DW.Lft movs.0
I mas I; r if1� ]
o'W°i iof[.r sM a g01f're7sr
JIMMY THOMAS
TIMMY THOMAS
rlf
in.n•
Au.[
.,s•
ALLENSVILLE TnP.• PERSON COUNTY. N.C.
NOVEMBER 1994. HAWLETT-JENNINGS A ASSOCIATES
J. JENNINGS L-3052---
Ft
��JOHN
�
a+rw, r-.. r7r r1.
Ml
V I
�flf
I
i
n1.
xY•A
40
isle
g111
If{7
VICINITY MAP
wr
Lv) 1-u
_A. t a rio.iA7m
� � 1
�. on.aLo PAO!!f
QIF - - - - - - -
- a >ttx LL F. .Dli[r
\ (� 7f.100, r. W
11 rr 7.
! ! bl•�f oaf,[ If
_ RD04L F. amtor
Co. Is*. F-04
' ` - - { .` ,Q t] ' ,[ - u +r .I,• . it ,r
IY 1 r I l s.a
107 19 1ACRES0' - o ' 7,7•„•.
� � � � �•, � s � I nur�u g. l f r
J
Lz) � / f 7 y � J I A or�a.wA if"fisr I o[.IM' i►we..,s r �
1 If
W.Tf' � T F' �' t v . � .- r✓ M � I
IF
1 40
Fj'
�Q1�.f
cn
_-- - '
1F IF I x. Nrrif ley
LEKND
W • NAIL FOUND
• I 0 NA I SET
r
0.133. r'.1
•
1, m"Iw "MT. A.
00. 177. P. 1.6
o • rc.1, r. [,
MAGNETIC
Ns L
IF • IRON FOUND
IS O ]RON SET
Ip o IIA THE-T 3CAL
FOINf
umm 11040, t[Al0 AM aim. twig is a
r,mlfrwAWf RAf. WT 7TR 7000,QLr1Ox, f40
ON 1nx?rARms.
amo np
R[G61l7,ED tA1r0 SURVEYORS
717 S.LAMAR ST. - ►.0.809 177f
l�dt6 xOrtM 17577
(910) 7

�',2 `, y} n,.F a ' \ t N, �• S A 11 4 tf .�;. "�•ir'. r * k �.. -y
`4 •� V J l � f I a s � - ��� j, CAI s 1!�}f � , � �' � 1
�i x � - t �. � � v fti -fr , s , d � ,• s +,'� •.w a '. 1�M s• zi fn
„ �yi+:ws 1.�; -+" t� L � r �� �1 �Yyir h a�N•..• rR>w � tf {Ji �� � {,. .� "� 'r ryvc �' S}' !
wI r 7r re {{ . s 7+ • y
y{rt,t'"( 41.i. ,. aRi�1�r Z1F�`�•7 ?A'•y� — `. r- _Y.
I , -L_ (ix _ ' p}+ r r • - • 1_ FlyA3�4FMa '- r?r ti ;� aj*n so o x3 i +0 +'"1;1 y; cam;,/v',. } •-;= vl>s; aT'.•t ,�. "�
may a' `y ' 1n �'/r „� .\ •
--' '•. � � ►f'! i; t � .x `''!q r k � 1;yv, .i�('�1�.:ti : �• r�' •'J� • �F �� z ' I I �
� •t,.,42 t` {,IiY_ 4 (�
.•...� •.'q ',[ f., .', ;rY:,�1
tzi
00
��,.�..`;�tT�,� #rY � •� ��, t'.?'t � k � �,� �'��•s"i �,pfti4� {rN' `;� !� �.4! .��i��'� � ''`><�l `r+ a .r, •[
141
i S C"'}rtf�7; k} •� x 'j �Ll7
fit:, �fr�,y " � S ��'�^.r �kv�{f,. •. �ro �A; �!"�•i^� � {{ll �iIA)� �s ���j �,pr ...•-. ��. �L. � ry �^� ���`..�
O £f•ti.a'1'r'�k,.� - t,_ �b 4 _ �„ff t+l"`r r '1R �. _ �y Q r F�L
r•' / h �q +f 't r4 t+r ,� M'.s_. �� h r i,�(yt µ� s �.+ v r tl iss `. ♦ `_,:.
�Y.
+ i x �t^i''L4Yr11 AL r1- .{ t tF f, C'1 6r. ';j{ �• ►t `T�y ram' - *,{S; r':`
I yet tl�i ,Y .7�' �`{� p•�SaS �t"•V '. h-` Tif� � �.' �� � i{.F� b I 2D,•
A rUFA u��sr#�vC'SI'`i 519� �' ��{s., �.�..��. { l � § rl�� � "+' `•�'..ti���� . j,.
r+` t9 t Sf,� .�y �. - •r.a.,�: ..y {S.'�'�4F��1` }��iq'� 1 S .t� {� f �� 5��1
f .L-
�'•�` t.��Y�l i �{ ?' � t.•i � ��.1� ��''zi' r - •k'+' # 1 ` ,r � +�tdY, �> L) �,.
�k' q
,1'~}kt'*'F {-�'_- h': i
°t t' Nu + (I �!_
.z '�.a;, Y f' i/'' (�. " I '4�._. ...Fpa• ii:
t , k '$ :.....�.- ,-r•L. �a'r7 is J'•��• '_" 4 ., S_ I � ' �'�'" j �� -r •d�,t- � • J. '.• � ;
�1{ + t<- • ! , w �t+!' {r `� i --,1 Afar- x 4- •r. `/. -+ (
�, •ir'y.- it '+'•r L •'/!' <'1t 't41:?ns+? kF ) ""rJh�1iF{'IsCL
is..
it/ilttilC jtii t' - f. jr`,(� I 'yam. ��•� ,"an.'.`�
�J k) _ t i�TJ'ri+� r _ � t.1` '{., �yJJ`�,RS���J�/,�t4 tF,r`�_�,a't•C p�Y�.4�,� ^+�4*y�, 1 '� Y � ��+ l � C1' 1. + {"" .b �G 1.
_.k, d,14 ' '•�Y��,� b'� i{'*F i. pi71� �7T' h� 'G' � ��t TE-•Ti �. � _ y ���^�T,rr ",�rA �5 r s- -. S, Li .r ;, � �� I�� �
y� ,t,s "��,�, �5'1,� �SiY �J-� rir , Wr,o- k�• �r qz-��',���' _ rt�`�,,,��5 i4'& '-r f�,��t{fir "W,s -" '�.. .1 i.
i � Tt �•�� �rt''�Jt� ! t -�j, � s {.• .y�r�� �4.r r�y �} t ��;� is �•7�it }�C y� .SV��.: fir'*} .�.. J ..
ttr ✓ �j.� 4•ij�h;;1� .,` yi lt� J� z: �x r r E►' rr:'�`_*.tT ,,�1,� -t? F f + f �1 T._;�!,�yr, +, t ••`a .s±7 e• �1
r ,.:.ti [���►►}.�.a t• �v ; •t. i'$xr,; c r. },+-�•y�": - -vl �..w *, r I, [i�Y �f ?•�,i Y ..� _.xt..'K",r `&`.rt
!4 ;<,.� - ','�" 'L A� _ } { ?!i' $a . t, .tCr '�'�� .Y� yy jj't'ti :''•, �it't e �, y,K:Lr � � `n '' S•-`•.. •% �i:ai�'` �k, � ���{y'',y '�".'
1 y�.,Xwr �✓-ril. r �5r--' ``"Z ;s �• .r�l�-� TL:E• � tr'i+!#°.r)�'t�. `! +a,� 7 _r�y rr,: �t�,,,,yf\, � ��Z.° �+t-.l t; �'r a,-r'1 - ''ir '
mc! .r,r h?; a•art��ilr, r4'1}ii� f �� s i+x% tV".�-•
�rsi7,�t �1rf'R,`' ^fit ��'? ,,:j` r � .. jyft, £t it+�, ,� s, is�`,.Y��' ,,,�rnr• ,.
,.: ? if' ':4,�)' � r''� k" � "�ii$f r t¢r � � � t 1: on ;:a� fi
b, i 6 i 4 l f I K? ir3kFk'+f.
* %r,-'1 r f • z s T s �; �t�q
riF r pthk" 3 �•ga't�")r. q c ?r`F ! -7 h1rl:'ra r>;'i•l tf, t•a
3-� ,� ilk, 'tr i '� ,��t,,� y d r s. i f -
;Y. fr y ,i`"'L.lot^h�•N �-!` V,�i aaq t7"
,-����
4�r*F `� Nti` ��;seS+�• f�Fu �i,� 2r;�tilk'� „'� s};5+}ti;`�+ik�4�Pst yid �hr`5�i }i�s...`y' r� •'M`eL,{' 'x
i5 " M. i+d �'t�ra x+r, t_i') ._ �1 `= p r ;�r':W i;,,�,, d, 5 i. k'PJ•. TSav d i#'Nr �l_�.F =,tk...S. !'r�yw., 1.::.:,, ...L.. �Y
t iy I
fit, aj,}{y*,'r+f`i� 1' r a r �yl:r•�€ "rN+ A :+r9�xt e fwi'`' t�, h�"'-r e:' r o- - V;r *:•••'.x • t,-.I ;s �. y.. 'l �C'.•M r?.l .-r�:i:.{`'s' .i, i,I •`w_..� tF
11
i-.1F�C�• `� ,si i� A�A ��tit1 i;}'`si l3�!`7.�� � � bi : S F #:?: �•.'�;:':,. r;Sl� to *n + � �y�'i�fi iti+�q';�r�+. �t��aiCi•','r :�rf tit�`��r?i4 � 4t' "� of '�
"33,r," 4r.:.'c;,�•�t' s t.�„�'t�:� i°+. �-..�'.{� ...< 1 �,),ir'#'!•�a ,_ �'a EY 4f tali tAj' d3, LaA 7;�fft 'J''.•• /.S�p, .r;, ct "t;•,,
I v. +�, y sl !,(w.."F qt`. '.S#.�.y _ i r t;•'^
v'S Y } : Y K,,f r Xi ; f 1 �1 i i�1•' p4bs
�°.. RIM' r. a '^' '�'t f,� 'S r y'� � i -'r" r r•. �x� t � � � , �'r•"h. S'� , t�•:. Ks,'ji $'r' „�.� e3' �' t i�
is� •� rn r ' y �.Y t
� `r. b7�,lti:`�ui'�; �-s"'ri t��y�l�jnyyTT, _ r � s�.,ri.•.� �'L°#�i �.j:;l; \: �„ c!o ,L 1 i; � ,it� ram; t, Crt.a� t ? j� ' 1 1•'^ 'i
°�a�r�r�t...'���i+..�•,��������;. ,
t .�...•t�._:1��,: ���r: �.i.� 1 � I ,��r- a y yl � ���' .1 +r `_3, !•` � •'''.. �' ?.; �� •�a'z ��r��,}?�� � !�
I °" -'•� rl I � +,.4' r �+1;�1,�'i, 4�rr�i`,y�e�� �.`�p�" t�r.��t5 .y�t� 4,;; ,_�t �t'��..3' i f. �"` p � •� 'f � I7rl��"� s 4ra 1..,_
,•k, t 3 IFwJ�"y t..y.''rNvl
5'�L,+�i.:if:�,r.•tFx�i����+�.� •1'(�, ��„��1„ .,
`. ��try Xf:r' I*r'3M• y.f11'-aY1 [T.•`+ i .i a _ �,n{�,. w.,•JG �.n _
�' ` A+ t 7
S �F y9 a t L l 11 "k ."•r •7
n ., r`,F,r N• nti Y dry♦t T 9 :1; gg [ `St s �+ F +.- rn
s•b �y� j -S,F� � , � ;1� �
.'1 a,J• ,
�.�' r� �i•Z5 � i � F �,+ sC11�1�'�++��r¢ i:�Jt,.. l� .yr. ����� ` ��r r�' � ��:rr'� �" °"' �� �', - • �{n ,,,
} SCty r t vn s: 12 r�, ,_'dY�t + ,� _ iy+d�..,i3 Kr 8;� i�rl` i iiiJ��'�t�l. �.y' r ",•
! �' �,2{`
l al j'irl'{' •P g,�ry'+�J RI �t♦�k' ..'A. '''' Eli
�`'t' F{r5",i?` r 7 I i. 'i r' r 7.]S` rt :i�' 't�,f f. i I'- �i:rr�• r`. L.y '�',-Y' • _ "'':' -
zFiy� dN�IrtyF 7 ) ��T�
l;tif��, i y�4' �r '�. �l• i � �i t,
Ir rA'�.dt . ,• , { "'�� 3fi� � � ?i� { AE •t?{�}i,� �� ■�) v,•��t.��^.y'jq�(f,J,i+y':} a • (`` � -h; r"'• pig
1 {yl ''•� ) ry�y((.� �. ' S ` lA e A'• +u Nf•�SS1i..7- �qA j�e7"Vr`l(pj'�� 5�`S'�ii �gV �■ �[+Pr'��g4 }' ,,e t
1.:,;yt f%i !•l„1 41, ,� `�.F+•t 4m +`,'�' �;r" �1l`/•'+;,�;`,�ff� ••➢�`•, +"��`-..,, /.F[���
yr`� +'!'At � � � [�•tF' a °{.`9a T:ri�+' .'as}S �•'' i�
r t FtS •4. 1! 4 7 i !-is. 5 N , i S7faf� • ',iaf c.? r,.LS +a', t. d� T ,. i
�w1f+�,n ��, �• t + !g+�� + a'_ � �fn�� �•� ,�Q
rt'F' t •Rl"
F j�: `` ��:� ./'t�'r. %,. : � r •. � • i4r+ '��` . I� � .1' �tl� M. :TF:i. .� t iI y+ [~ 4_ •�f •Rr • _
, �A. 4 "`���" � ' t;,� zJ•� ! ' �Y � p � , G�`h �'r..�(S r �,;�� �. ' �Le .A�a1i � �r• �'w � � s�' Ste, �
i ,fir• r+1 "` ��. '��:' J •"6.Mr'3 r 1 SI, g!� �� � I „�r t ,.,f s s r^ •
Irasy, �� t'�'..7o-?• ",,• �r �,��`. �j . t. `� .ti_ f'f, i(r�j• �i ii %`�`r�'l"', ���fY7 Y ,�%E�i��,t{;���
fl i' � �' :i r� w• +f<+"'�' i�. ta4SL„`f��iL yts �, `#��t� ri�lP,'r � 'va
gray
�.i•t i#.i.-
1 F' i„� i' _ .. ^ y S ' . Y.-- µ r9L r t r ? ii•r'Ij,' >,K.?� h �`tI'd
i ♦ art" rz, .
�,11 t i!C ,rr! 1 •�{4[� .w t .S{ Tyj4 r.
�'
�yI'r1J.i4 ri'�•Yh�f tt�1,* ��rV•r'afC yi �►•��f lJr t , �1j ��_`s f�Y �'.`^.L°r�1`R�t'�t ST?,^,{S� r��'y Y,f�
5�+~r rlT+ tii 1-..4 '? .. �.! +1ct'.NirLr .v'r�+rlifiW i?^+4•.q� 7�;' tp f,, }•� '`' •'++i
F +'�`�._y�i .f• p � • 1t r7 'd .r � 2 I a•ti ,N r! r r k r � a< �hz, +�C ��i lx.• �a f {,.
,� r7r �r '4r` 6 ,�
r1yT}il}�'' `��� :'I x>,p�La� T'.f r � �: `r � ��'� r �� d t� ..'a � � '�E�. + ., ;F��i44�,�.5 �i i rid+ '� �ir` 1k `�•`�
., l'�.•.:?. h�..�5'i::r11 �. +',G!1 !. .rP�'i tJ i v:': fr.l: �Z �,y,.'I�+�,r,'r.}.Y��J[,'�.'i�� pis; •.r i'�`<:1#f.i J�.+.:,�' �k�vn".. �-±�r�: ytf�'... ?~5�::�'

ra._.
�4'yXi
��"T•y� ;t C( S
yYYYf''4Y S�� V�
EK sure
f r.
7
kxx�Y
r �ffiF}1"Z8 11'1
of
Farm s
1

p
o V
i
ji
Ju
fv
��a�
i
1
.7
D
�
--
LLei
f
- --
0
nq
33f7
,7i1J�r
d7��a
►°
— N
►�'
l , o-o
�`� ry
a
i
foil&
i

fa D 'Ai
e AOL' 7'
�j
U'r
0.47"'.
-9 r 6p )Lt
—44
lit 44, Ol
ali
4 cm

TI T
. . . . . . . ...
oil
'Ir %AM
.328
S
i
sRr
3&L

rrIC-1 1 i�►a inR> yew.
Fnend
,
Oav,s .5211rienrMlis
50
np
• �.
�\ 1 Cerrfa - V �•
r_•t� 9,` _
`' `���� J (/ � --��r
Jill
it-j" ) l; ,I�
��'��+`�r
Y
�'�
1 /�` ��� �!• �
t� __ter _ "'_ ; �
IS
b
� �
� ..��• s�� ;
r}r•`
IQQ.,
(
. / Q� _, • �. �/ SSSS
f -dig
� }. •,'�, � J/f �� � �.�, .
it
�� � � ,.
i s`��� � �55' ��
1
(,/1.
7x S•�.
d
.j `
�•
Yf
•U� N
~
la
Li I
��1� V
lam' �
4• :, J ��
`� 1�,'� � �
f �' ~;�
�. ✓J � ��''f�'� �' ,��_, `
T.
•��,� 1 ^
I% �
l.l'`
� `� �^
,,^�..`. �� 'gyp
:'Teellni.c¢llnsrtuCe
33
CD
r j c::
^Rock,Gr

• AlM11UJ w naiiU Shin
n i Y t z i
�
... .. :...�* af. ........ _ _ _ F a
•°7 3 RV NtIX KI1• 7 41rY + �ti ` 1Cl RY .X�a yO� J
rill
t,,r�l 1n,i1,
Yr ej � a; fK Y Y111INOXyt °
••y � Y47 O O °+ f � � M!1 YNOIYI+• �/3A! fn+ � S V 4YVa LS
r i I)k t ,"0
• rr °• � XI
t { 4Ooi •�,,_ ttti 1f70S all il,rltr
or AMIckv �� H
NVIaa 04, 4r, w1,aM al
• ylof • rooltY7NISv") V ` O• K/l °` T O 41Y LYYsl
• S•
• (y a
rpol
It„ aY R,sllYslll
Yall
1 RY t)i rnnN +t1+ S asl� Hyzul w =r!I 3WH3 BWil
L7,Yrp
• y 1,.M a•+l� aO1! Y v A! vkll. ` 1tl0 tltr � r 1 w -i�bV oY °,71itr4M..
Itli �` aY hits °+r�°r! - it 1 11Y , loolcul
k'i ^.� •}, o
I : a7 rill ; Mr /{ .p rye ° 1Fi1,7N r OY • aNal �!,
Str 1- AOr S A am.
MIL n
uit V
+ R ^ o rt° 1 i otrT v I E
a+• O))r a ? °°+- Y73v:Ivva12 02°},i]ly a+j7VL
ltll ° ' R• tt!! C
.= i a° MDypY •'+aA,a s,,+"" 171Y.,
' R4 111rr0 ya4!hlI aY ° ++ a•
A O
• 2 w 11't 6 )I�r °Y Y77 Y4J " h H1�ON •)e {Ja
or o d =ll+ w t vo 13A31 .
° c � = y o ;ar lu
F `ir W. °Y ar°pw °
aY J�` Y ` A •�• ` °Y 17Nsnol •
err, °Y4Y roswo nl,
MY7Nfvi. • '� •C!I • °� a
8 Na+ 11)YYYa t '� Na3htl1
Oy, rcrl R a
• °1 85 l aY Ilk
S 3 NA
HIS
I • a+ • Ty
�°, � �T• a v'ti� ai
.• arrN LIMY _ � � AY i
.i
1 w � l� ��d • !A 2
1 a o o+
5+t�`Nr1l1M♦
•Y S94t l,Nrtna M''rfit, o�
31V0$�00a8
Nally b a
R4 or r ,ti _ o 2t ° o n ° OuMIS
d4pi °•
it ANN30 o 6b
° � aY N7YRN° 1kaYa
C b l,ll�i Nlllr t44+ E E 4 O E
aY ) a am + °
tltl n K41 311aASN311Y °ga 41YjX ° , •E R
OHOU
• AY[Ni0 � y ° a
• t 7 R pY ))�� or
1 N•sMl,'+ tr5� y�1 l/ • j 111� r. °4
1 ' OYE4=r 1 + lhil aaol 1111►L`
��.
a4 a ,1
f4f'M Ca � i4� r NY4Y �
1 R O !KI He Y•
pSl I
r + ° 1lINXRMYIA MOiMY1 r raa
a °Y iwonrlt Y9oOYr 61' �A S� it SXff d{
aY XanV
.'r am Sloorr' S M�+)•t t °� )lgYOinr, °j sxaoi aYl
• r` °: ; ♦ ooN owsw*oN s: �� _ 3AI3
S r` '�► �7 .' +, a � - � 5 v Dec
� s •y41 °�+ U � '4 P
llrrNa : - - •
Y a My
HOIS
1iJ 3
aY a�la
°r4 '� SAUIN39 ^ 111YtN7 CilY 1'left a
44
� tSl +lMt4d'f +�F,WWi[�,.viLSA.j.iff_'j y„�...,j y

IIV
IN
—d Ir
I „
rt� /
„
r p�
/ 31TASN311V
1 y
I
/49
•
ffirl =s

o2So I
BPS
ppn�
IAn e!
r
J f
f / f
--------------------------
33�
�~ @ Ir t, r`}Acc
Inc.
n
t FGr,,�

CAWMP WcmLblc A:'re Traveling Gun Caanpuli-ior-I WOrk:hec 2-20.99
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMTUTATZONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) .r 737 o Field Number (Identification) 1 2,11,
2. Irrigation System Designation ✓ Eiisting Irrigation System New/ Expand ed Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes 4 Interior Lanes g Exterior Lanes -----[feet] Length of pull(L 1)
n Interior Lanes 9 Exterior Lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
n Interior Lanes _ # Exterior Lanes _�lfeet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted Diameter -30-0•-[feet] From field data sheet
5. Spacing o? oo Hydrant Spacing [feet] _ o 2 %-- [as percent of wetted diameter]
5. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on natttern_ snacin2- and travel lane location.
II / _ f4 I s7-N I � F� a m . ,4J I' Port ; a , s�oP E.,.r T.
rT,�n�#� FAf 1&4% 1,}je igr�es L�P�y��)Cw�d1R)�y�sb0^ APrPS �ie�cs Aces 7rcve�
LAn�
S O. 6 7 (3 9 y.sJ 5`2 3 �}
A �a . 3
�7
.3 (79J(�
S D . -:<8 ���CaO a)/9� SG o = 3. �3 O, �%� 174, S �
0. H3 ?&sJ62XC-OkJ�o ss 0.3(" 3.
o, 7 y �C� sus)/y ��o 3.S 0. Js a . s
7 Fe - y o 0. a $ (.goo) l 7s� f y3si o = /. a o /•
3.3
o. 6-7 t7-
1,36
0.
10-3
fir- �r 6 7 Sfl� CaS�)/�� s6 0 -3 0 . ��, a
i� r
�w. 3&•$7.

K �•
C �
c ems` ti _
� �
— — — —
•
� �
� 'i
X -rni' •� `� p
i0 Orn
i
i 6
r' Zn •[
a
Y'
0N,a
a o. z (n (/LM
N Z
O
r
.an'LLr
r
! Y
�
51
ifl
V
ono•
60, 15sl —
�L7. Sep
I
a3
a i
•
A

PFQSS AWFIqATP IN UTTH V§-- qRQqNpl S , ?,P
MOP14 wj., N,��§qR ff RINP Npl?, 4-�,5
084
50
70
so 100 170
58 108 180
so
90
66 17b 190
75 124 190
loo
110
63: t30 200
92 1 . 37 206
70
53 1.32 iso
fi0 260
40,
90
143
-J-02-
M-
83 168 210
120
91 176 220
108
80
90
53 168 200
59 180 210
loo
110
66 191 210
73 200 220
120
79 210 220
W
93 227 230
1.18
90
100
51 206 210
56 215 220
110
120
¢2 229 220
68 240 230
130
140
74 250 230
80 260 240
150
86 269 240
1 26
110
120
51 257 230
56 267 230
00
140
62 278 240
67 287 240
150
72 299 250
1 34.
130
140
50 302 230
55 312 240
150
58 327 240
8-8.
4..41
2.9
2.2
l,Q
1.5.
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
9,0
4.5
3.0
2.2
1,8
i. s
1.3
1.1
1.0
09
iii
i5
.
3.-o'
23
i.8
1.1
to
0 0
9J
A .9
3.2
2.4
1
I.A.
1..2
1.1
10
32
24
..9
1.9
1.6
1.4
1.2
I'l
1.0
10.1
5.1.
314
2.5
2.0
I-T
1.4
1.3
1.1
10
10.4
5.2
3-5
26
21
17
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.0
10:6
5 A
15
2.7
21
1.8
1.5
1.3
1,2
1.1
1 1 1.2.
5.6
3.7
2.8
2.2
1.2
1 1
11.3
3.8
_.LO_
2.3
tB.
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.1
11.8
59
3,9
3.0
24
10
11
1.5
1.3
1.2
lt8
59
39
29
j
io
13
12
12.5
62
4.2
31
2.5
21
1.8
.
1.6
14
1 2
1.2,7
6.3
4.2
3 2
M
il
1 .8
1.6
1A,
1.3
13.4
6,7
45
3 4
2.7
2.2
1.9
1.7
1.5
13
13,4
6 7
45
3.3
2.7
21
1.9
1 7
1,5
1.3
141.
7.0,
4 7
3 5
2.8
2.3
I a
1 6
4
1
69
46
35
2.8
-io
2.0
1.7
1.5
71
'A
45
72
46
3.6
29
J.3'
4
il
l.8
16
1.
145
7.2
4.8
3.6
2.9
24
2.1
t8
1.6
1.4
146
7 3
4.9
36
2.9
2.4..
2.1
1-18
1.6
1-5
153
7 7
51
38
31
2.6
2.2
ta
13
15
153
77
51
38
31
6
2.2
1.9
1.7
15
159
80
5.3
40
32
2.7
2.3
20
la
16
158
79
5.3
40
32
26
2.3
20
1.8
1.6
164
82
5,5
.41
33
27
2.3
2.0
1.8
1 6
164
82
5,5'
41
33
27
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.6
17.0
8.5
57
43
34.
2.8
jA
2.l
1,9
1.7
16.9.
8.5.
56
42
34
28
2,4
2.1
1.9
1 7
17.5
8.7
5.8
4.4
35
2.9
2.5
2,2
1,9
1.7
17.4
87
5.8
44
35
2.9
2.5
22
1.9
1 7
19.3
96
64
4.8
39
32
7.8
2.4
21
19
19.0
9.5
63
48
38
3.2
2.7
2.4.
21
19
199
10.0
6.6
50
40
li
ze
25
2.2
20

-am
ENGINE SPEED SETTINGS FOR THE.
C1030IRRIGATOR
SPEED�GEARRAN$GE ENGINE SPED GEAR RANGE ENGINE
FPM
,,x.r...Ps , ^��"> i; .- :..:�., ^��: , ;;;:, +- --.. ...:,�,:.�.,.,--a�.: :. -.� a+w5>.•x�:a T sir,.: . t'�'- .�"{A :.. w .:.a' ,. - � � ,. „ ,., .
1,00
1
LOW
2430
1.25
1
LOW
3040
1.50
2
LOW
2160
€ 1.75
2
LOW
2520
2.00
2
LOW
2880
2,25
2
LOW
3240
2.50
2
LOW
3600
2.75
1
HIGH
2710,
3,00
1
HIGH
2960
3.25
1
HIGH
3200
3.50
3
LOW
2640
3.75
3
LOW
2830
4.00
3
LOW
3020
4.25
2
HIGH
2480
4.50
2
HIGH
2630
4.75
2
HIGH
2770
5.00
2
HIGH
2920
5.50
2
HIGH
3210
6.00
2
HIGH.
3500r
6.50
3
HIGH
1990
7.00
3
HIGH
2140
7.50
3
HIGH
2290
8.00
3
HIGH
2440
8,50
3
HIGH
2600
9.00
3
HIGH
2750
9.50
3
HIGH
2900
10.00
3
HIGH
3050
10.50
3
HIGH
3210
11.00
3
HIGH
3360
11.50
3
HIGH
3510
12.00
3
HIGH
3660

•
CERTIFICATION CHECK LIST FOR
EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Waste Utilization Plan
Operator has acceptable waste utilization plan
Planned irrigation system is compatible with type of waste storage facility, soils,
crops and pumping schedule shown in the waste utilization plan
Field Specifications (Use USDA-NRCS Table 1 or Similar Table)
cl�r
Legible„FSA photo copies and county tax maps of effluent disposal fields
Maximum useable acreage of each field shown excluding buffer or restricted
irrigation areas. The designer will decide usable irrigation area of each field.
Soil types of each field
Average slope of each field
`Crops to receive animal waste are shown for each field
`Recommended maximum average precipitation rate in each field (where there is
more than one soil/crop combination that results in a different recommended
precipitation rate, show the recommended maximum average precipitation rate for
each combination)
Recommended maximum application amount per irrigation cycle in each field
(where there is more than one soil/crop combination that results in a different
recommended application amount, indicate the recommended maximum
application amount for each combination)
3. Working Map or Sketch
Ditches, perennial streams, wetland areas, and other bodies of water are identified
along with the size of each.
/Surrounding water wells are located
Surrounding dwellings, schools, hospitals and other important structure locations
are shown
l 10/14/97
M

CERTIFICATION CHECK LIST FOR
�. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Highway right-of-way locations are indicated
Location of farm roads, fences and other obstructions are shown to scale on map
Critical property boundaries are shown
Critical el �atinshat are used in total d nam'c h computations are shown
r� ocation of irrigation mains and laterals s nnkler or ;gu:n:h:y�drants thrust blocks,
etc. are shown with the design spacing of hydrants anpipes recorded on the
map or sketch. This will be accomplished by the irrigation systems designer.
(If Possible)
4. Irrigation Design Parameters (Use USDA-NRCS Irrigation Design Parameter
Worksheets or Similar Worksheets)
A. Traveling Gun Parameters (USDA-NRCS Table 2 or Other)
Type of speed compensation (USDA-NRCS Table 4 or Other)
t Design travel speed for each pull
Design precipitation rate for each pull
Design application amount shown for each travel speed
Effective width (lane spacing) and effective length for each pull
Operating pressure at the reel and the gun for each pull
Nozzle diameter in inches, indicate type of nozzle (taper bore or ring)
Wetted diameter at specified operating pressure
Arc pattern for each pull
Hose length and inside diameter
Make, model and type of traveler and gun with manufacturer specifications
included
2 101I 4197

CERTIFICATION CHECK LIST FOR
EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Gene al
Irrigation specifications should include a pumping schedule for each field giving
the number of pumping hours required to meet the crop PAN requirements. This
schedule should indicate the gallons or acre -inches to be applied per acre, the
S amount of each application and the total number of applications. The schedule
/ should also give some idea of the timing of the applications.
The Plan should discuss application record keeping, need for sample analysis,
need for soil sampling and length of time to maintain records
The Plan should mention the need for an Emergency Action Plan (EAP).
The Plan is the responsibility of the grower. .
he Plan should include information on annual system evaluation
The Plan should discuss soil type(s), soil(s) maximum infiltration rate, total PAN
generation to include sludge, loading rate(s) based on Realistic Yield Expectations
(RYE), and maximum loading rates both during summer months and wetter
winter months
J� 4 10/14/97

If
TABLE 4- Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
Aerating Pressure at Pump (psi)
Design Precipitation Rate (Inlltr)
Hose Length (feet)
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Pump Power Requirement .(hp)
ALE Thrust Block Spcciiica ionss
t7esBlvner 5 - nrnvidn thrust hlnAlr rinlaile nn arnaratn thpwt
' LOCATIO
THRUSTBLOC
ft.
90o Bend
Dead End
Tee
See USDA -MRCS Field Office Technical
Guide, Section IV. Practice Cod tl-DD.
NRCS, NC

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: -Joe
Company; 's 11 ` 1
Address: D q S. m or ,� 64 • % 23 o.CCJOra l rV C eZ 7�7,�
Phone:
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
lie following -details of design and. materials must accompany all.ii igation designs::
..A scale. drawing of the proposed irrigation system'which tnciudcs hydri m.loenttonti-"trayelYlanes, pipeline routes, Ilinist block localions and buffer areas where applicable_ . ._
Assu nptiorr's and cot�npir lions fgC dettcti 0. ng total � arnic hcacl�and hor4sepowcr rcquircmcnls.3
Co{nputations used to determine ull mainline and`Iater pipe sizes:= ,-
5onrces and/or calculations user! fordclennining applicatioii"ratcs:' "
Computatians,used to de(ermine'the size of lhrust,blocks and illustrations_brali.tlynist block configurations required in (he system.
Mafiufactufr?s specifications for. the irrigation pump,'traveler-and spriiilder(s).-
Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or. USDA -MRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C' Field Mice Teclunical Guide, Section IV; Practice .Code 430-DD. .
The information required by this form are (he mmimuj&icquir6ncnts. It is (he responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address (Item as
appropriate.
Irrigalion pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pondembankmcnts without the approval of llic designer.
OTE: A buffer strip � v feel wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of [lie irrigation sysacm and all perelutial
streams and surface waters per NC Stalules.
" hfRCS�
.TUPJE,

BIG GUN® PERFORMANCE TABLES U.S.
UNITS
100 SERIES I9IG GUNS --- 24" TRAJECTORY"
100 T TAPER
.� BORE NOZZLES
Nile Nczzh Not21e Na12,e HDzxte N0724 Nozzw Noule Np[xh
=13
QPM DIA. GPM 41A, GPM D/1 GPM CIA. GPM
".. GPM DtA. OPM DIA, GPM
DIA. QPM 01A.
s0 50 -vs sa na' 74 zzs 87 z36 too tab' 115
23a 130 266' 150 273 165
260• 2tN 300'
70 6o z23 l6 238 e6 2s6 t03 M.17p 2T5' t36
2e3 155 295' In 302 197
310• 203 33a•
30 66 245, e9 256' 100 270, till- 263' 136 206, 156
300' 175 315• 201 326' 223
33527a 392,
Ila 76 265' 92 270' tt1 290' 12@ 30J' t!0 31!' 171
32a• 105 335' 222 3aa' 2a7
35S' 30a 3a0'
'Ava'IeO+e q ly WTM FIOv a sAlpo.
OQ_R'R1MQ,1'1Q.Z2 _ `t, ' i�:'
100 ON DIFFUSEA NOZZLES
• •-PSI , ..'7t AMVQ •77 RING AING ,98 141N0 HA'Q" gING f .93 AINO
�;�G
.% RIHG 0.3 DN 0.0 DIN
NG
0.70N 0.0 ON
GPM DIA GPM DL1 0PM Dµ GPM DIA 0PM DIA
GP4 GPM OIA GPM Dµ
OPM DIA GPM 0,A
.0 6a 208 70 212 1 91 216 103 224 ej-118 256 13a 2aa
t52 242 45 Im a6 168
pl In 1Ip 1p6
60 at 236 9e Z40 110 245 125 260 141 270 194 27
—18,1 2e0
V Oil 20113
60 pa 256 $11 2% 127 275 1 146 265 167 Wo 109 305
211 315
. t00 IM 270 17a 280 tat 2?5 j ,62 306 le: 320 212 325
236 335 —
" 1Te d.arnplar u! I-- Is auPol. imat*Iy 3ti: lead 'or Ina 211 Irnieci0ry anew. e4 la" br Ia :
150 SERIES BIG GUNS - 240 TRAJECTORY"
ISO T TAPIER.60RE NO2ZLES
NO;rI. NDCxIe Horde
Nozxla
Joule Nc¢Zle
NDulq
1.
P,g I.
CPUDIA. GPM D A GPM DIA.
GPM NA,
()PM OIA. GPM OW
GPM D+A,
60
' 110 265' la3 Z65' 182 305'
225 325'
275 3A6' 330 366,
366 380,
a0
126 790' 160 310' 210 33S'
200 353'
715 371- 1 3a0 386'
dab 410'
100
143 310' 18S 330' 235 36b'
290 375
355 aa6' 425 420•
600 a40'
,20
t57 330 Z0a 360' 266 375'
320 395'
365 a20' •65 e40'
5-5 a60'
R RING NOZZLES ratJe
c1in4 •-'r;::: �. i"B- r.. , ,
' ae• ;'.�m-';�•.:: 4
InQ R�nfl
1.0a 1aa-
A26 Qinp
ti.2e 1.3<'
AInQ
t e1
I
PS.I. GPM Olk, ;iaGpM•"•'4.'DIA,- �'*
6PM qu. GPM DIA
In Elm
OVM DIA, GPM OIA.
GPM 01A.
I 60 110 260' 1 143 2e0'
lop W
102 300' 225 ,u15•
275 3351 330 350'
305 386'
a6 125 250' t-165 .- '"300'
1 210 320 260 34a
315 3a0' 360 390'
«s 396•
100 ' tdi 3oa• ?05:4aw,320 ,
236 UTZa0 380•
366 300' a25 a00'
SAlk
00
12u 157 TS' 20a ]35
266 380' 320 aa0'
386 400' a65 4Y'
Say a36
' ••Try a:ame— 01 Ih'0 V aPoredma,q+y 3% ha. la. the 21• Iryermrl' angle
200 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 270 TRAJECTORY"
2040 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
NOZlk
NOW Nozzl6 NDi 21e LN�ylo
Naxxle Nnxx4
SI.
QPM DIA,
QPM DIA.OPM DIA. QPM D,A.G1A.
8P4 DIA CiPM DIA GPM DIA.
GPM DIA,
70
27=013N 0'
310 3e0' 355 396• e15 a,D' •00 a30'
555 150' 030 405' 7!6 495'
690 $18'
i 90
31C 3g0'
390 •f0' aa3' Say a66'
025 ae6' r15 506' 853 535'
4006 SS5'
t 110
3a0 qt0'
350 a30' a70' 605 aph'
t"6:450'
=-I
095 516, 7p0 S36' aa3 503'
1110 3p0'
37C i:5'
425 A.$- 485�1 J616- I 56i a6fi' 655 515'
755 5a0' asa 560• 1025 Sao,
12,n 420'
�200 R RIIN S T �fT
t Ping I ng I :1' Ring
1 %+' Ring 1 'n' Aing
2' Rle,g
.49 acl.al) 5a ecl�arJ7 ,.6c' "'.Aw
I .x equal 11A]' .c+ualF
QPM GPM D1A.
(1.83' equal
GP4 0,�
P.SJ. GPM OIR { QPM OIA pvM O+A,' GPM 01l.
D1A.
AO 250 9a0 330 370' 386 390• -6 a10'
a16 ate• 506 aa0• I
aaa +s3'
I 00 290 370 390 100• 445 a20' Sty aa0
Soo a66' 075 470'
Vs 400•
1a0 326 390- AZs a25' S00 445' 375 4a5'
1 600 41101 755 500•
900 520• I
t20 I 355 a10' 165 «6' 545 a36' 6im-M30 ass'
72S SOW US 520'
e$ 545'
7na 2emelel cl 110 i6 g00r0.'mce,y 2% tep Ior d•e 244 ❑"CWy angle_ SO% 16M 10, IN 21• Waleew•y a,"
The BIG GUNL pall rm O dele Au Seen ODleingd under .deal me COn6min6 v'C met he ad,e Me'y
M1eCted by —Ind, Poor hyd'Wlc enlMnCe CflnnVl'C".i Or Olntl' IallOM
NMson lrt1ga1Ion GoroOrmlan makes no rnpr9.enW'en mge'd:.yq droplet c c!44n, un.lenn+y. 01 .PPHCO IOn •.I..
'/.

0
a1/0.1X
0

j
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilizati" n -- �
This plan has been prepared for:
Thomas Farms
Timmy Thomas
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake, NC 27583
336-364-2633
06-14-2005
This plan has
Kim Woods
C
been developgd' �y: N
��
;� co
NCCES Person County
304 S. Morgan St.
Rm 123
Roxboro, NC 2 75 73
336-599-1195
Developer Si atwe
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
%-� 3
Si tore (owner) Date
? -/3 05-
19nature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: J4�1D. ��� _ 13-O S
Technical Sp ialist Signature Date
----------------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Cover Page 1

5 J
i
Waste Utilization Plan Amendment
for Thomas Farms (Allensville Unit)
The owners of this animal operation plan to change the cropping system:"'The
updated cropping system will be on a 2-year rotation of Corn, Wheat, and double-cropped=-.���
Soybeans in all of the fileds in the current plan except for Field 7 on Tract 111. That field'
will be in fescue hay year-round. A current Nutrient Management Plan was generated on
the Nutrient Management Software and is attached. Also, a field addition has been made.
Field 10 on Tract 111 is a 3.5 acre field planted in Pines in 1998 on a 7X10 grid to achieve
600-620 trees per acre. Pine trees are not currently in the Nutrient Management Software;
therefore, the numbers for that crop are listed in this narrative. Field 10, the pines, will
utilize 80 pounds of PAN per acre equalling 280 pounds per year or 560 pounds of PAN
over 2 years. Please see attached conrespondance from the NCSU Forestry Department. By
adding the amount of PAN utilized by the pines and the cropping system in the Nutrient
Management Software, the total PAN applied is 7569 in year 1; and 7647 in year 2 for a
total of 15,216 lbs. over a 2 year period. That equals 3,020,031 gallons in year 1; and
3,051,153 in year 2 for a total of 6,071,184 gallons over a 2 year period. The animal
operation produces a total of 6820 pounds of PAN each year for a 2-year total of 13,640
lbs. That equals 2,721,180 gallons for each year for a 2-year total of 5,442,360 gallons.
This indicates a PAN deficit of 749 lbs for year 1; 827 lbs for year 2; for a 2-year total
deficit of 1576. That equals 298,851 gallons for year 1; 329,973 gallons for year 2; for a 2-
year total deficit of 628,824 gallons.
(Lan wner) Date
� 05
(Technic Specilist(s)) ate

Subject: Re: Pine Trees
From: Doug Frederick <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:37:38 -0400
To: [e-mail]
CC: Kimberly D Woods <[e-mail]>
Kim - Sorry it has taken me a long time to provide some input to your
questions. I agree with Rick and his comments. I have found from
experience that young hardwood trees cannot tolerate hog -waste spraying at
high rates. I have not sprayed pines with hog waste but 100 pounds of PAN on
trees less that 1D years old may cause some burn. I too would suggest you
ask Dr. Lee Allen since he has done a great deal of work with nutrition of
loblolly pine. His email is: [e-mail]
Doug
Rick Hamilton wrote:
Hello Kim
An Appling soil is well -drained and aerated, so we won't see accelerated
denitrification like we see on poorly drained sites. My recommendation
would be to not exceed 100 pounds PAN per year. Preferably, I'd like to
see the site rest every third or fourth year, especially until these
trees get a little more age and size. The few folks I know that are
applying to forests are applying to pastures and fields in the growing
season and are using the woods as a dormant season backup. It is OK
legally to apply to forest land year around....
By copy to Doug, I'm asking him to weigh in and give feedback if he has
other inclinations.
Best, rick
Kimberly D Woods wrote:
/ Rick Hamilton wrote:
Hello Kim
I tried to reply to you the other day, but was on wireless and don;t
know if it went out. Doug Frederick is the guru here on hog waste
application to trees. It would be helpful if we knew some information
like the age of the trees, soil type, frequency of application,
number of trees per acre. From that information, we can try to settle
on a PAN application rate.
Best, rick
Kimberly D Woods wrote:
Dr. Hamilton,
I am the livestock agent in Person Co. I have a swine producer that
wants to add a field of Pine Trees to their Waste Utilization Plan,
to spray swine effluent on these Pines. I have not been able to get
in touch with anyone in the Forestry Dept that can give me an idea
of how much and when the effluent can be applied. Dr. Deanna Osmond
in the Soil Science Dept suggested I contact Dr. Lee Allen, but I
have not been able to reach him. Any help you could provide would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Kim
. Hamilton,
The trees were planted in 1998. They were planted on a 7X10 plan so
there should be somewhere around 600--620 trees per acre. The soil
type is Appling. The owners would like to apply as often as possible
throughout the year. That would help maintain a low level in their
lagoon. I realize that application only once a year may be as much as
Pine Trees can tolerate. Any help you can give me would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks, Kim

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 13
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,724,280 gals/year by a 260
animal Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
6275
Incorporated
10776
Injected
11867
Irrigated
6820
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied 0bs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
6,820
7289
-469
2,911,591
-187,311
Year 2
6,820
7367
-547
2,942,538
-218,258
--- -- - - -- - - -- - -------_---- ------ -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- - -- - -
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this sot
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
estimates are also provided for each crop, as we] 1 as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the
Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rat in B
L1
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Restacr
(tb/acre}
Applied
(lbs/acre)
1111
2
1.50
1.5c
Unknown
5.3
Appling
Corn, Grain
132 bu
58
NIA
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
32
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
45 bu.
36
NIA
111
4
3.12
3.12
Unknown
4.9
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
N/A
111
5
11.09
11.09
Unknown
5.0
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
111
7 1
3,95
3.951
Unknown
5.2
Appling
Fescue Hay
5.5 Tons
86
NIA
111
8
4,62
4.62
Unknown
4.8
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
N/A
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
N/A
3210
l
6,50
6.501
Unknown
4.9
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 hu,
59
NIA
Wheat, Grain
65 bu,
33
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
3210
2
2.34
2,34
Unknown
5.0
Appling
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
59
N/A
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33
N/A
I
------- t
I
I
I
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
37
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 33.12 33.12
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/14/2005
PCS Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
<2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Estimate
6bs/acm1war)
P Loss Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0.0 to 1.0
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 1.0 to 2.0
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 2.0 to 4.0
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 4.0
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
551946 Database Version 3A Date Printed 6/14/2005
PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements_,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract I
Field
Source
0)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(1bs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
111
2
N/A
Appling
1,50
1.50
Corn, Grain
132 bu.
2115-6/30
147
147
0 1
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
2
N/A
Appling
1.50
1.50
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
9/1-4/30
129
129
0
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
brig.
150
59.92
0.00
186.94
0.00
Ill
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4I30
131
0
0
brig.
79
31AD
0.00
97.96
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Com, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6130
150
0
0
Irrig.
150
59.92
0.00
664.47
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
brig.
79
31.40
0.00
348.18
0.00
111
7
S13
Appling
3.95
3.95
Fescue Hay
5.5 Tons
811-7/31
244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97.46
0.00
384.98
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Cum, Grain
135 bu.
2115-6/30
150
0
0
Irrig.
150
59.92
0.00
276.81
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/lA/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.40
0.00
145.05
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Com, Grain
135 bu.
2/15-6/30
150
0
0
Irrig,
150
59.92
0.00
389.461
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4/30
131
0
0
brig.
79
3 L40
0.00
204.07
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2.34
2.34
Corn, Grain
135 bu.
2115-6/30
150
0
0
brig.
150
59.92
0.00
140.20
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2.34
2.34
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
Irrig,
79
31.40
0.00
73.47
0.00
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page I of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
U)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res.
pbs/A)
Applic.
Melhad
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid 1
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied'
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,911,59
qg
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,72428
Balance, 1090 gallons
-187.31
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
+-
_ r
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means ]eased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs/A)
Canm
Fert.
iutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
pbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied'
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
ga1/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
111
2
N/A
Appling
1.50
1.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
45 bu.
4/1-9/15
175
175
0
N/A
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4/30
131
0
0
brig.
52
20.93
0.00
65.30
0.00
111
4
S13
Appling
3.12
3.12
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig.
179
71.50
4.00
223.08
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
1 109
11,09
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/1-4130
131
0
0
trig.
52
20,931
0.00
232.121
0.00
111
5
S13
Appling
11.09
11.09
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig.
179
71.50
0.00
792.93
0.00
111
7
S13
Appling
3.95
3.95
Fescue Flay
5.5 Tons
9/1-7/31
244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97.46
0.00
384.98
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4/30
131
0
0
]Trig.
52
20.93
0.00
96.70
0.00
111
8
S13
Appling
4.62
4.62
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9/15
179
0
0
Irrig.
!79
71.54
0.00
330.33
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6,50
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4130
131
0
0
Irrig.
52
20.93
0.00
136.05
0.00
3210
1
S13
Appling
6.50
6.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9115
179
0
0
Irrig.
179
71.50
0.0
464.75
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2.34
2.34
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
911-4/30
131
0
0
Irrig.
52
20.93
0.00
48.98
0.00
3210
2
S13
Appling
2.34
2.34
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9/15
179
0
0
]Trig.
179
71.50
0.00
167.31
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,942.54
x
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,724.28
i
Balance, 1000 gallons
-218.26
Total Applied, tons
`�-t
0.00
Total Produced, tons
'-
0.00
Balance, tons
s-
4.44
Notes: 1. 1n the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, awned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 WUT Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
111
4
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
5
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
7
Appling
0.45
1.0
111
8
Appling
0.45
1.0
3210
1
Appling
0.45
1.0
3210
2
Appling
0.45
1.0
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/14/2005 IAi± Page I of 1
NOTE: Symbol *'means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(]bs/A)
Mn
(]bs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons(A)
Tract
Field
111
2
Req'd Nutrients
147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acrep.
s Ap
Period
1.50
2/]5 6/30
Supplied By:
C' ti
` ri,
�3?J
rin; u?��
f a +fir
rz� +? ,
r� :'t
i,
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comm ercia] Fert.
147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
132 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal I Rating
58 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
Tract
Field
11 t
2
Req'd Nutrients
129
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
1.50
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
�.ry�r
V _' t
1 ..'l.: i'✓.. �T'�_
'rid a r�,sY;
� � *
�'M. .�.r�t� 11
t 'i• �
i �nr� S' •,
«..�Y..',}`.-�-
� �
�y � � �Jnr +�
:.y`S �,e..._i
, �
f {r, p,
i� .14'S �.1
R "� r�F "
' � �
L _Vil��i�tii
'° wi
-. � �k
�,"'
H. ,
:wS.rY. M.
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
Q
0
01
0
0
Commercia] Fert.
129
0
D
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
64 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
32 Ibslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'tract
Field
1 l 1
4
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres ]App.
Period
3.12
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
mple Date
65 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
al Rating
33 lbslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
7]
179
16
1
3
1
0
Field
E
111
4
Req'd Nutrients
1500
0
0
0
0
00
pp. Period
3.12
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
RYE Sample Date
135 bu.
02-02-04
Manurel
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
59 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 1 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
I
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
Obs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
111
5
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres lApp.
Period
11-09
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
ol
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYESample
RYE Sample
Date
135 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
150
82
205
19
1
3
1
01
P
Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
T",
Field
ill
5
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App.
Period
11,09
911-4130
Supplied By:
;W�
49
�Wm
NM
'6W M.
MB44 12
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter ;1
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
65 bu.
1 02-02-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
P Rating
33 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
711
179
16
1
3
11,
0
ERemovall
Tract I Field
Ili
7
Req'd Nutrients
244
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
App.
Period
3.95
8/1-7/3 1
Supplied By:
,Vllk ".x
' "
-17,11'11'� "
l!"I 7�.-?--I I
"
`IKNI-�"-
MR19-0611
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
00
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE
RYE Sample
Date
5.5 Tons
09-13-04
Manure
244
133
3341
30
1
6
1
0
P I Rating
86 lbstac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
133
294
30
6
1
0
Tract
I Field
ill
8
Req'd Nutrients
150
50
0
0
0
0
0
A
pp. Period 1
4.62
2/15-6/30
Su
v
CAM
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil SerieS
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
135 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
01
P Removal I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
155
18
1
3
1
0
Tract I Field
ill
8
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres ]App.
Period
4.62
911-4/30
Supplied By:
--w- -
gy,
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0;
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
01
01
01
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu. 1
09-13-04
Manure,
1311
71j
1791
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
33 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0[
711
1291
A
11
3
1
0
551946 Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 6/1412005 NMR Page 2 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
I
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
3210
I
Req'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AcresApp.
Period
6.50
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
11;11'�'
WW
wwlw;�M
Mm'
r
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
Comm erci al Fert.
0
0
0
0'
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
131
71
179
16
1
3
1
01
P Removal
I Rating
33 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
71
179
16
1
3
1
0
Tract
I Field
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
f)
Acres IApp.
Period
6.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
090 U-11
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
U
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYESample
RYE Sample
Date
135 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
P o'
Rating
59 lWac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
ract
t
Tract
I Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
]so
0
0
0
0
0
ol
0
App,
Period
2.34
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:it-
�IIWAMU
RIM N"
t0wm
CROP
Corn, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0-
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residua!
01
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
135 bu.
I 09-t3-04
Manure
150
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
P Removal I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
82
205
18
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
3210
2
Re - q'd Nutrients
131
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IApp. Period
2.34
9/1-4130
Supplied By-,
-A' P"I.,
. �, -, P
5 ME, W. -',
ME=
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series.
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
65 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
131
711
1791
16
! 1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
Unknown I
BALANCE
()1
711
1791
161
1 1
31
11
0
NOTE! Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 11 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 3 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
111
2
Req'd Nutrients
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
1.50
1 411-9/15
Supplied By:
�tm
09mlaw
OMWME
sm
NM19M
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0,
Commercial Fert.
175
0
0
0
0
0
01
()
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
RYE
45 bu.
01-31-05
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P v
I Rating
36 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Tract
I Field
111
4
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
App.
Period
3.12
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
'VM7
NNW
441i&R�
6111111.te"MA
0-1i'm
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
46 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
179
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal I Rating
37 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
Tract
I Field
111
5
Req'd Nutrients
1791
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres lApp.
Period
11.09
411-9/15
Supplied By:
VAI
yq
1�
NOMIRIH
R111
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
ol
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
46 bu.
02-02-04
Manure
1791
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
3 7 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
Tract
I Field
111
8
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
so
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
I
Period
4.62
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
g
MT77;
—J. a—f`,
y,�
N
.x , i
EAENRE
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comm erci a] Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
46 bu.
09.13-04
Manure
179
98
245
22
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
37 Ibs/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
98
195
22
1
4
1
0
1
Tract
I Field
3210
1
Req'd Nutrients,
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
6.50
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
1
- A"
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0�
RYE I Sample Date
46 bu.
09-13-04
Manure
179
98
2451
221
1
41
11
01
P Removal Rating,
37 Ibs/ac.
Unknown I
BALANCE'
ol—
981
245
22
1 1
41
1 1
0
551946 Database Version 33 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 NMR Page 4 of 5

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
3210
2
Req'd Nutrients
179
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres IApp.
Period
2.34 1
411-9115
SuppliedBy:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
46 bu,
09-13-04
Manure
j 1791
981
245
221
1
41
1
01
IP Removal
I Ratingl
37lbs/ac.
jUnknown
I BALANCE
I "1
911
2451
221
11
41
11
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6114/2005 NMR Page 5 of 5

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should betaken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
ReQuired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
111
2
Corn, Grain
6.0
0.0
1247
None
857
None
111
2
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
1247
None
$57
None
111
2
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
OA
1247
None
857
None
111
4
Cam, Grain
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
4
Wheat, Grain
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
4
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
559
None
448
None
111
5
Corn, Grain
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
5
Wheat, Grain
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
5
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.3
0.0
1971
None
1372
None
111
7
Fescue Hay
5.8
0.4
2083
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH al 6.0.
1606
None
111
8
Corn, Grain
5.8
0.4
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1654
None
11
8
Wheat, Grain
5.8
0.0
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1654
None
111
8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.8
0.0
2110
Caution: Seek alternative site where
possible. Maintain pH at 6.0.
1654
None
3210
1
Cam, Grain
&0
O.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
1
Wheat, Grain
6-0
0.0
1232
None
i003
None
3210
1
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
6.0
0.0
1232
None
1003
None
3210
2
Cam, Grain
5.8
0.4
1776
None
1269
]None
3210
2
Wheat, Grain
5.8
0.0
1776
None
1269
None
3210
2
1 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.8
0.0
1 1776
1 None
1269
None
- ------ ------------- -------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 STV Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In mast cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but'other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
37.73
75.46
113.19
!-fay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
18.87
37.73
56.60
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
35.37
70.75
106.12
---------------- •---------------------------------------------------------------------•---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Sludge Page i of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Stora a Ca aeit (Da s
Start Date ign
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
52
1
2
49
1
3
56
1
4
87
1
5
117
1
6
148
1
7
122
1
8
96
1
9
107
1
10
120
1
11
115
1
12
106
2
1
97
2
2
91
2
3
85
2
4
93
2
5
94
2
6
122
2
7
162
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
154
2
11
129
2
12
101
" Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- ---- --------------------- ...------------- ----- g
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 CapacityPa e 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
---------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------- ....--------------- -
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----- ---------_.----
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
-.. ------------------------------------------------------------------.-...--------------...--------------------------------- -
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/W2005 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/14/2005 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 ibs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 ]bslacre in no -till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Crop Note Page I of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 7
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
------------------------ -•-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
551946 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-14-2005 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:
By,
Farm: Tract: Date:_ _/_J_
• To utilize agricultural wastes for
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT? livestock feed or as an energy source.
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient Management/waste Utilization Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES
Your nutrient management/waste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT 1 WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this Job
Sheet and the attachments meet the
minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
purposes. This Nutrient Management
Plan includes:
I A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan).
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
or resources (streams, wells,
sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
3. Your planned crop rotation.
4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
Index (LI) as required.
6. Realistic yield expectations for the
crops in the rotation, and their source
if other than default values approved
for N.C.
7. Recommended nutrient application
rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page E

and method of application and
incorporation, if applicable.
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable
information), that provides the following:
• General requirements of this practice,
as well as additional requirements to
meet the natural resource protection
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to
this plan.
• Operation and maintenance
information associated with this
practice.
Because this Nutrient Management Plan
includes agricultural organic sources,
additional items are required in the plan to
ensure proper waste utilization:
• Waste Utilization Agreement (if
applicable)
• Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement (if applicable)
• Additional engineering design and
operating information for waste storage
structures, transport, and application
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent
overtopping or other discharges from
storage structures or facilities, as
applicable.
This plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal,
state, or local regulations or policies.
Changes in laws or regulations may
necessitate a revision of the plan.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
UTILIZATION
General
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management
plan (see the following section, "BASIC
REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT")
You are required to acquire and comply
with all federal, state, or local permit
requirements related to the handling and
application of manure or organic
materials.
The nutrient management/waste
utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement must exist to address all
organic waste not handled by the nutrient
management/waste utilization plan.
Manure or organic wastes will not be
applied to the following areas:
• surface waters,
• wetlands, unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment
system,
• soils subject to frequent flooding
during the period when flooding is
expected,
• frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other
than those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
• within 25 feet of surface waters, or
• within any other setbacks as identified
by federal, state, or local laws or
regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
being applied within 75 feet of a
residential property boundary or
perennial stream or river if the facility
was sited on or after October 1995.)
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
in a manner not to reach surface waters,
wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
Sludge.that accumulates in waste storage
structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available
land and/or third party manure agreements)
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in
adherence to all nutrient application
requirements. All federal and state guidance
regarding the proper testing, handling,
planning, and application of sludge must be
followed for regulated operations.
Since compliance with all applicable North
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste
Management for questions.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED
if applicable, all agricultural wastes or other
organic residues used for feedstock must be
handled in a manner to minimize
contamination and preserve its feed value.
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall
develop rations that utilize animal wastes.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY
If your facility is to be used for energy
production, all energy producing components
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and
provisions for the utilization of residues of
energy production identified. Your Nutrient
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT
General
Application of nutrients must comply with all
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
The realistic yield expectations (RYES) in
this plan are based on one or more of the
following:
• Default values approved by the N.C.
Interagency Nutrient Management
Committee that incorporate soil
productivity information, yield data,
and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Additional information on the default
values may be found at:
www.soil.ncsu.edulnmpincnmwafindex.htm
Documented actual yield data from
the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
consecutive specific crop harvests.
(For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
the last five years.)
• A fertilization rate recommended by
North Carolina State University may
be used in cases where no yield data
or approved RYE values exist for a
crop.
• An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
chemical features may be used for
new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
ONLY be specified by a certified
Nutrient Management planner.
Erosion, runoff, and water management
controls have been planned, as needed,
on fields that receive nutrients.
Soil Testing
This nutrient management plan has been
developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
Soil samples must be -collected and
prepared in accordance with North
Carolina State University or the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of
Water Quality, Laboratory Section,
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
Growers who utilize other laboratories must
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology
to ensure the test results are compatible with
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide
consistency, all laboratories used must
provide fertilization recommendations using
guidelines and methodologies as referenced
at the NCDA&CS website:
www.ncagr.com/agronomy/obook.htm
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory
that is supported by field research within the
state.
Soil testing shall include analysis for all
nutrients for which specific information is
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Plant Tissue Testing
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall
be done in accordance with North Carolina
State University or NCDA&CS standards or
recommendations.
Manure Testing
Nutrient values of manure and organic by-
products shall be established for planning
purposes based on laboratory analysis,
acceptable default values, or historic records
for the operation.
When determining actual application rates, a
laboratory analysis is required. State
regulations require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year.
Acceptable laboratories include the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
certified by the NCDENR.
Field Risk Assessment
A field -specific assessment of the
potential for phosphorus transport from
each field (or groups of similar fields)
have been conducted, using the North
Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT)
PLAT assesses the potential for
phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
site to surface water through each of the
four primary loss pathways:
• sediment -bound P transported
through erosion,
• soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
• soluble P leached through the soil
profile, and
• non -incorporated source P
transported through surface
runoff.
Based on the assessment of each loss
pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
rating will identify whether nitrogen or
phosphorus shall be the rate -determining
element in developing the planned
application rate for manure.
PLAT Rating
Nutrient lication Criteria
LOW
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
MEDIUM
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
HIGH
Manure application limited to
phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
VERY HIGH
No additional manure
application to be specified in
plan for the site.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with NCSU
guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices
that reduce the potential for phosphorus
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips,
ponds, water table management, and residue
management and conservation tillage.
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or
planned, have been incorporated into your
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the
management of the site actually affects the
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the
PLAT analysis (including any required to
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient
Management Plan to be approved.
Nutrient Application Rates
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider
current soil test results, RYEs, and
management.
Liming material shall be applied as needed to
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients.
The application amount and rate (in/hr) for
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation)
shall not result in runoff from the site. The
application shall not exceed the field capacity
of the soil.
The planned rates of nutrient application are
shown on the attached sheets. These rates
have been computed as follows:
Nitrogen Application - When the plan is
nitrogen -based (a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium), the application rate of manure or
organic by-products shall be based on the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops
without established RYEs). This may
result in an application rate for other
nutrients that exceeds the soil test
recommendation.
When the plan is being implemented
on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
rating of High or Very High), manure
or other organic by-products shall be
applied at rates consistent with the
phosphorus application guidance
below. In such situations, an
additional nitrogen application from
non -organic sources may be required
to supply nitrogen at the rate
recommended by the RYE.
• Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
All nitrogen rates for hay production
are for pure grass stands. Due to the
nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
by 25% for the portion of the expected
yield that is removed through grazing.
Phosphorus Application — When
manure or other organic by-products
are used, the planned rates of
phosphorus application shall be based
on the PLAT rating for the site, as
follows:
Low or Medium Rating — The
planned manure or organic by-
product application rate is based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
High — The planned
manure or organic by-product
application rate is limited to the
phosphorus removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass.
Very High Rating — No additional
manure or organic by-product
application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 5

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be
recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or
recommendations.
A single application of phosphorus applied
as manure or organic by-product may be
made at a rate equal to the recommended
phosphorus application or estimated
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple
years in the crop sequence.
• When such single applications are
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen
removal in harvested plant bio-
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended
nitrogen application, or
• not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating.
• Potassium Application — Punned
potassium application rates should
match the soil test recommended rates
as closely as possible. (This is
particularly critical in situations where a
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or
other organic sources, the addition of
potassium from non -organic sources
may be required.
• Other Plant Nutrients - The planned
rates of application of other nutrients if
applicable are consistent with North
Carolina State University or the
NCDA&CS guidelines or
recommendations.
Nutrient Application Timing
Timing of nutrient application shall
correspond as closely as possible with
plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
considering cropping system limitations,
weather and climatic conditions, and field
accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
saturated soil.
Manure or organic by-products shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
For nutrients applied through irrigation
systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
distribution of material at planned rates.
Plan Review and Revision Period
A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
to exceed five years.
Heavy Metals Monitoring
For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
and copper concentrations shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites for
application shall be sought when these
metals approach excessive
concentrations. The following criteria and
actions are provided:
Mehlich-3Index
Action
Zn-I
300 (21 Ibslac)
Peanuts are very sensitive to
zinc, and application on peanuts
should be limited. Seek
alternative sites when possible.
The risk of zinc toxicity is
greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-I as low as
300. '
500 (35 Ibslac)
Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts.'
2,000 (142
Caution: Seek alternative sites
Ibslac)
when possible for all crops. '
3,000 (213
Critical toxic level for all crops.
ibstac)
Cease application for all crops.'_
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 6

Mehlich-3Index
Action
Cu-I
2,000 (72 Ibs/ac)
Caution: Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops. `
3,000 (908
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibslac)
Cease application on all crops. `
Maintain pH at 6.0 on these
sites.
When sewage sludge is applied, the
accumulation of potential pollutants (including
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state
and local laws or regulations. Additional
information'on heavy metal criteria for sewage
sludge may be found in Land Application of
Sewage Sludge, EPA1831-B-93-002b
publication number at:
htfp.-11www.gpa. aovInpdeslaubslsludge.ndf
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER
In areas that have been identified as impaired
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from the site. (The streams/water
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA-
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section
I.)
•W
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in
an area where surface waters are
impaired, with agricultural nutrients
identified as a likely source. The Leaching
index (LI) is not required,
❑ YES
This nutrient management plan IS in an
area where surface waters are impaired,
with agricultural nutrients identified as a
likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
is included in this plan.
While the results of the LI does not affect
your planned nutrient application rates,
some additional conservation practices
may be specified in the plan to reduce the
risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
applicable.
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
soluble elements and either or both may
be components of organic and inorganic
fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
move with water as leachate down
through the soil, or over the soil surface
as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
phosphorus exist in different forms and
may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
can have detrimental effects on both
surface and shallow ground water quality.
As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
severe algal blooms and fish kills.
Because of the topography, hydrology,
and other factors in the state, the
environmental problems from excess
nutrients reaching surface water may not
be exhibited near the contributing source,
but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico Basin,
the Chowan River, the watershed of the
B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
watershed of the New River in Onslow
County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
waters in North Carolina.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
water and eventually to surface waters.
(Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan
in some areas of the state with surface water
impairments. The LI uses soils information
and local climate data to assess the potential
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results
of the LI analysis and recommended actions
are included in your nutrient management
plan, if applicable.
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be
transported off -site than recognized in the
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3)
in soluble form leaching downward through
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by
site, and depends upon such factors as soil
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The
results of the PLAT analysis and
recommended actions are included in your
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus
removal rate. In these cases, the planned
nutrient application rate is not sustainable,
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be
reached.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
You are responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. The following Operation &
Maintenance should be conducted:
1 Review the plan annually to determine if
adjustments or modifications to the plan
are needed. (The S.B. 1217
interagency group guidelines
accepted by the N.C. Division of
Water Quality for .0200 operations
specify a plan revision when there are
changes in crops or cropping patterns
that utilize more than 25 percent of
the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
management plans shall be
thoroughly reviewed every five years
and revised if necessary, The next
review will be performed in
2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
product storage facilities from weather
and accidental leakage or spillage.
3. Ensure proper, calibration of
application equipment to ensure
uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
4, inspect and maintain the equipment
and facilities used to implement the
Nutrient Management/Waste
Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
applicable, annually.
6. Records should be maintained for five
years, or for a period as required by
other Federal, state, or local
ordinances, or program or contract
requirements. To ensure adequate
information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
included:
• Soil test results and
recommendations for nutrient
application,
• Quantities, analyses and sources
of nutrients applied (When the
actual rates used exceed the
recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
• Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
+ Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
+ Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE; State laws or regulations may
define record -keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner, Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential' risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice .fob Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003)
Page 9

Waste Structure Cleanout Plan
09-14-2012
This plan has been prepared for:
Thomas Family Farms
Timmy Thomas
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake, NC 27574
336-364-2633
This plan has been developed by. -
Kim Woods
NCCES- Person County
304 S. Morgan St. Rm 123
Roxboro, NC 27573
336-599-1195
Developer Si&Vture
Type of Plan: Waste Structure Cleanout Plan
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
Y (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this cleanout plan.
,:::;�
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical S iaiist Signature Date RMENGYIDBO
SEP 17 2012
AgArPm*cjwSecfi "
------- 18884$ --------- Database Version 3.1-------"".___"" ---- -Date Printed: 09-1420f2 """ """"Cover Page -L"________."._

Waste Storage Cleanout Source Description
. I
SOURCE: Allensville Lagoon
Date Measured: 06-22-2012
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 600 X 148; BOTTOM - 540 X 88; SIDE SLOPES - 3:1
Liquid Depth: 7.90ft.; Liquid Volume: 2,246,641 gallons. Waste Sample #: W000056
Total Depth: 7.90 ft.; Total Volume: 2,246,641 gallons
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen
Broadcast
7233
Incorporated
11644
Injected
13761
Irrigated
5998
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.)
Actual PAN
Applied (1bs)
PANSuxplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
I Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
11,644
12,987
-1,343
2,505,.821
-259,180
.9k ........ WN-A --- Nisfi..—Iigi rii.N.-
,mum Val is of the application 'i i i a �d 6:� i n ft
- w @eiidon W6"s fie lss6ai
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 09-14-2012 Desc. 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the
Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each Feld, where available.
Ifa field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Flat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P2O5
Ranoval
10bs&crc)l(1bs/acre)
Applied
111
7
4.62
3.70
Unknown
N/A
Appling
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
32
N/A
1 I 1
8
3.94
3.20,
Unknown
N/A
Appling
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
32
N/A
872
4
Unknown
NIA
Geor eville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
872
572
Unknown
N/A
Geo eville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
872
573
Unknown
N/A
Geor eville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
NIA
872
574
M5.54A0
Unknown
N/A
Georgeville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
NIA
872
575
Unknown
N/A
Geo evilie
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
872
576
unknown
N/A
Gear ville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
.872
578
Unknown
N/A
Geor eville
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
872
574
Unknown
NIA
Hemdon
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
NIA
872
580
11-70,
9.4
Unknown
NIA
Up=
Wheat, Grain
49 bu.
25
N/A
872
581
9.0
7.20
Unknown
N/A
Lignum
wheat, Grain
49 bu.
25
N/A
872
582
2.3
1.8
Unknown
NIA
Geo eville
Wheal. Grain
59 bu.
30
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 135.93 115.78
188848 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 9/14/2012
PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE. Symbol i means user entered data.

Li
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>_ 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<=10
solublenutrient leaching below the
root Zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding rapacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No-T111(778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian forest Buffers (391). !
Lass &-ft ate
(7bs/a2ek,7)
P Loss Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0.0 to 1.0
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 1.0 to 2.0
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 2.0 to 4.0
1 51 - 100
High
I Application Iimited to crop P removal
> 4.0
1 > 100
Very High
I Starter P application only
188849 Database Version 3. t Date Printed 9/14/2012
PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Closure/Cleanout Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the application of animal waste planned as a result of the closure or cleanout of one or
more animal waste storage structures on this farm. The waste applications shown in this table are planned to occur prior to implementing the overall Nutrient
Management Plan beginning in Year 1. The waste applications described in this table are also documented in the closure/cleanout plan that was developed as part
of this Nutrient Management plan.
Closure/Cleanout Waste Utilization Table Year 0
Tract
Field
Source
ID
soil series
Total
Acres I
Use.
Acres
crop
RYE
APpliG
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
OWA)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Mangy
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(tbs/A)
Liquid
ManurrA
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied I
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
Solid
Mann:
Appiicd
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/q
Tons
1000 gals
tons
111
7
U1
Appling
4.62
3.70
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
91I-4/30
129
0
0
Incor.
129
24.8
0.
92.09
0.
111
8
Ul
Appling
3.95
3.20
Wheat, Grain
64 bu_
9/14130
129
0
0
Inter.
129
24.8
0.0
79.65
0.0
872
4
UI
ille
73.66
65.80
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
114
0
0
lnoor.
114
22.0(.0.
1.447.34.0.
872
572
U!
Georgeville
8.70
7.00
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14130
114
0
0
Incor.
114
22,
0.01
153.97
0.0
872
573
U1
Georgeville
4.10
3.30
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
911-4130
114
0
0
Inoor.
114
22.0
0.
72.5
0.
872
574
U I
rgevillc
2.30
1.8
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1.450
114
0
0
Incor.
114-
22.
0.
39.5
0.0
972
575
U1
Georgeville
2.20
1.80
Wheat, Grain
59 bu:
9/1-4/30
114
0
0
inter.
114
22.0
0.0
39.5
0.
872 1
576
U 1
Goorgewillc
3.30
2.64
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-450
114
0
0
Incor.
114
22.
0.0C
58.
0.0
872
576
U1
G,orgcville
4.60
3.70
Wheat Grain
59 bu.
9/1 4130
114
0
0
moor.
11
22.II
0.0
8I.3
0.
872
579
U1
Handon
5.5
4.40
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/14130
114
0
0
Incor.
114
22.
0.
96.7
0.
872
590
Ul
Lignum
11-70
9.4
Wheai, Grain
49 bu.
9/1-4/30
95
0
0
lncor.
95
18.33
0.0
172.30
0.0
872
581
U1
Lignum
9.00
7.20
Wheat, Grain
49bu.
1 9/14130
95
0
0
Incor.
95
19-33
0.
131.98
0.
872
582
UI
-rill,
2.30
L94
Wheat, Grain
59bu.
9/1-4f30
II4
0
0
In,or.
]l
22.
0.
40.4
0.0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,505.81
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,246.
Balance, 1000 gallons
-259.17
� = "
Total Applied, tons
^;� a '
0.
Total Produced, lions-'•
:
0-
Balance. tons
`^`'��'$-"
0.00
188948 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 9/14/2012 CWUT Page 1 of 1

Land Application Table: Allensville Lagoon
Source Type: Cleanout
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
PLAT
Rating
Crop
RYE
Crop
APPuc.
Period
PAN
Qbs/A)
1�N
APB io
Liquid
Manure
APF Od
1000
gal/Acre
A ppli c.
Amount
(Inches)
Applic
Method
N
N
111
7
Ul
Appling
4.62
3.74
NIA
Wheat, Grain
64 bu_
9/1-4/30
Incor.
129
i29
24.89
0.92
111
8
Ul
APPlinB
3.95
3.20
NIA
Wheat, Grain
64 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
129
129
24.89
0.92
872
4
Ul
Georgeville 1
73.66
65.80
N/A
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incur.
114
114
22.00
0.81
872
572
U1
Georgeville
8.70
7.00
NIA
Wheat; Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
1141
114
22.00
0.81
872
573
Ul
Georgeville
4.10
3.30
NIA
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
114
114
22.00
0.81
872
574
Ul
Georgeville 1
2.30
1.80
NIA
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
114
114
22.00
0.81
872
575
Ul
Georgeville
2.20
1.80
N/A
Whcat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
114
114
22.00
0.91
872
576
U1
Georgeville
3 30
2.64
NIA
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
114
114
22.00
0.81
872
578
U1
Georgeville
4.60
3.70
NIA
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
1141
114
22.00
0.81
872
579
Ul
Herndon
5.50
4.40
N/A
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9114130
Incor.
114
1141
22.00
0.91
872
580
U1
Lignurn
11.70
9.40
N/A
Wheat, Grain
49 bu.
9/1-4130
Incor.
95
95
18.33
0.68
581
U1
Lignurn
9.00
7.20
NIA
Wheat, Grain
49 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
95
95
18.33
0.68
M872
872
582
1 U I
GeorVville
1 2.30
1.84
NIA
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
Incor.
114
114
22.00
0.81
NOTE: * indicates user defined value
198848 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 9/14/2012
Allensville La oon Summary;
Source Volume Available: 2,246,641 gals.
Source Volume Applied: 2,505,821 gals.
Excess Application Capacity: 1.1.5 %
LAT Page 1 of 1

Lagoon sludge often contains high concentrations of zinc and copper. high levels of these mewls in soils can adversely affect plant growth. The following
table provides a conservative (maximum potential) estimate for increase in soil index values.*, Due to inherit variability of waste and soil sampling, it is
recommended that conservative soil target levels be set for copper (e.g. Cu-1 < 700-1000) and zinc (e.g. Zn I < 300 for land where peanuts may be grown;
for other cropland Zn-1 < 700-1000). Alternative application sites should be selected ifthe Ulowing table indicates that concentrations of these metals may
approach excessive levels. For maximum copper and zinc soil index limits, see the NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (Code 590).
Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sato a
Crop
Source
ID
Applic.
Inches
Waste
Cu PPm
Waste
7n ppm
Soil Test
Cu-1
Soil Test
7n-I
Cu-1
Adj.
Zn-1
Adj.
Estimated New
Number
ire
Soil Cu-1
Soil Zn-1
111
7
SL022028
o2-2o-12
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.92
9
t8
766
412
54
52
820
464
111
8
SLO22029
02-20-12
wheat, Grain
Ul
0.92
9
18
695
411
54
52
749
463
872
4
SLO22028
02-20-12
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.81
9
18
31
34
47
46
78
80
872
572
SLO22028
02-20-12
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.81
9
is
35
23
47
46
82
69
872
573
SLO22028
02-20-12
Why, Grain
Ul
0.81
9
18
25
It
47
46
72
62
872
574
SLO22028
02-20-12
Why, Grain
U1
0.81
9
18
25
116
47
46
72
62
872
575
SLO22028
02-20-12 .
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.81
9
18
33
20
47
46
80
66
872
576
Si.Q22028
02-20-12
Wheat, Grain
UI
0.81
9
18
2
1
47
46
69
60
872
578
SLO22028
02-20-12
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.81
9
18
35
21
47
46
82
67
872
579
SLO22028
02-20-12
Wheat, Crain
Ul
0.81
9
1$
42
47
46
89
72
872
590
S1022028
02-20-12
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.68
9
18
43
23
40
39
83
62
872
581
SLO22028
02-20-12
Wheat, Crain
Ul
0.68
9
18
31
1
40
39
71
57
872
592
SLO22029
02-20-12
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.81
9
18
11
1
47
46
64
62
* NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
188948 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 09-14-2012 Metals Page l of 1

GENERAL LAGOON CLEANOUT INFORMATION:
Cleanout Start Date: 09-15-2012 Cleanout End Date: 10-31-2012
This plan has been written in the Fall of 2012 in order for Thomas Family Farms (Timmy
Thomas) to remove sludge from the lagoon at the AllensviIle farm. Nutrient source numbers
were derived from the waste analysis of the sludge sample taken. Wheat will be the crop to
which the sludge is applied.
Buffers and setbacks are as follows:
100' from water well supply
200' from residence
50' from public ROW
75' from property line not owned by producer or lessor
75' from blue-Iine stream
750' from public areas; such as park or church
--------- -- ....................................................... ----------•---------...--------------.------.-----------•---------............
Preview Date Printed: 09-14-2012 Info Page 1

-
f�`
t
�•rry7°.•r-.r�-!-S.t.,��`� I +- j t+' - also
� W �.� �.L k .•�:h - , � �t y �`_5�,k�� % J` �, �1 - �,� f � �Y�y4n l � � Y
Of
- a M ST+. ,� _ '. �i � /�� '.,� -., ��••�`�,Tx'''W'„�1 _1-�.sS r. �i se•µ Y -
• f,,cj .. - + f �- ? j Y 'r ✓1 .„will zqs �lisnai. �' 1 ', � i
.�
ii Y1r2 kaV! l�1 "5=' t��!'S�-
'�.
i y
r i�✓, f �`,rII :li�r :-� 5 �,. 5,1��:s?1.,?'��ri.YS �}� ^` ��cr i�a. r�� .S' '+' r, ,q,,,vLss� - F
no
yam! 1, MFn.
.; + y , ��r Sy.'y` r ` r, �Y* =t7. +}. .: 1� (� '--..r. i•y"�P� l [ � °'itf � it
40
� J�n�
1, AM
ARE
P l y v4r r Ic 1 r.. 7 t. ti 4 rr.
K!'.f{sii �it'44'Fie lr l �`e"4h y r y r. 3 r5. ^+ •'' y r
j � L �E` t� { � r 7""ti !� 5 ��� �, i'{,r � rj , .c� h � ti �„ � - a ,� r t 5i ti �J• '.
�L �w, -Jq oar WS ra �' R{ C .� -•rK 3Fr � 3 � •yF f r � s i}+ � ^{h, r h � y i
� v
if
r�
R7�i,� � ��tt k. 3X�h•4 + ���t - _ / ., t t -� � '� f n'f�-} vYY �7a.r ♦rd � .� �4lF � {1` IA e�y% �1t r
{ •C` r , ' b � 1 - 3 ' s?- �' t� � 'f � n we r • r ,1 - ♦! ( ! �w�'� '
� ti� '•,���-� r e r ' ' r s' "5 ti t'4 , � s l x '� �� �, y ; a 1"wtir tu,,, � i�. •, a r 5' ��..�`� ��� t� '.
t I^ � �.. -. •t-��i��s t �` a Qy k t � �r • �(s W r rrr N .a x :, F
, �H i a [ .f sr ,�.>. r y, t _ ln'•Z `
}•� ;= rrl'�"7 f s"-!` r�x f ` F'fffi ".+.
,r� d'`�'�`c c L �.� -) a ; F � �,.s>«y �.% Ups 1•', J13 ?s,� r �s �' x,
Lt�..+ak�3�,a�.�,riy'�1,�¢��_�,,-t�ty9 ° F >, `� � e• a �.7' yam.
MASS
4.•. , ±r ty h r k ijei� s5i
_ ,r••,• •sr r?i3 - sy, -r r.
t. ;
a t^Li�vktt - v r r�-MA ( tij �', r +h C -
r _ rh st:" �+ et ,{
s
i lt� r � "�F � t h •k i '�S+e� �v>
_
vaa�r�f�. - '` #Rs•�u,�.f;'Y iS 4s s fi r' J avq_� r` t -. of �. _ : m r•3 'rr'�_a-. V r �} lam y ;� ''t
+ ;1 W.
Y K: 'Xud i t rr1 '�t ?�H�L s j 91 t-i» l i r'. 1 ,.,_, ,:,71. �v �w-r 4 y r'..' -'•y `r%+, vi.,p�trr
� � i �5 , a.W ' f '- 7 ., I �. t r� '•� f�- �?11.5�.���./- rr- �C- �+ ���f_t�f.��
R�
-'iSt
` yx�rlS i �'4+ � i - r F �`�ti �5 +3 h a t .1 1 � � - L � � ♦ 5 � � ; E n�i t� r � F-•�e e r r -.
�< ,, ��r�� �'S!�;�:r�` �''r e �t � yr ,�; ,�� ►. r "�", u�v' v•� .�, 5°F� t�..•�r � ? _.. n � "J$. ; .s. F ~ z 1
�' _�� �r �ryj K3� 'f � 1 �, . �T'`� I ,itn t �� l�1 F � E ,. • 4 s� y �� i i± � �, � §>' a �•'�1 •7�.
dR :a '� r;! � �t'kE � ��ri r �5 -' Q i -'=� : ka�j. 1� �. r� r ��-, fi,•} w L .
s�+ } , �3y 4 '�,s' y t}t t.�' '�'T'�t �l � • I, _ t fr+ f y � s }' � Z `�, 11
�; - � r ,"'•Cti4` Z�t,� c�,' e , `ti�y�f � 2. k p 1 T � j i ,s 9 1 -s.- r,. ssr t �; r�
3Y C 1 �+5� �� xl ✓ 1 .S � �� • h .� ��� 1J M + � ,. 14fNi•5 yb 3 ,�..�. i M� .
,rk r i tl� �' �f�-R' �"?'�s'� c, r 4 �r3�. �.�r y��' t -�;�•t _Ir
L' f _ �y,�^ 9 1�'+' 'i. ;i1 y��'4 - rF. ! .fi• �.+ s - -t � .�5� r� = x f J� t y, i- - �+L .
`— -'�' Mr + �'f�`rs ,3 �F7 : ? `:f�y,�i 't c ;r is ✓y,.nj r' :.� e tt -a t3 r e '� _ S� ` j is -�i_ f1,.
iOcs, ,
law cA ? t�� �•T1`' ._w.-.'tti. . ` - -,, - ; 4,t y t F !Y. "/ ; r
i i' ,bC ,.I••��r� r it 'c. t i = t
i
*'y? f �,�•,'3a�j.; yp, r k - i"4 �t r r>+ ' ' �': tr ,n.
���'��1• p.:�,s rr.•'Y# e�'�f 'T`+tw, �L� pry• .s"L,7'a.a t � �'.r, aF �� cs • `��•
`• � � ls�y � dry+ i ,t �7Ae � �•F� _ c, al l r' �'��uJ'n " i �,i'e i a i '��- G»,j fir" tl,� � + f 'p cl � F� r y .�
T�. .w..��..,�^il �L.cl._.t._.ytt.„yn• : �_ - +� �.�r� - -�,•x ke;;s,,. �3>w•Y��'_. fii•�v.•.. .ti�`�t-y:�'.�_`�'r E.. ^.s'� - •t
On

' .' `���
;�. ..:
. r, *. ;.
,,, r i .� . � ,�:
�� 1 J 4�i.
�:.. � �� ,
'�:.. -� .
i,,�r ...
.,
.. _ �/ �� .
.' \ _
'1
.. �: T. �.� �_
I .. f�
r/ ''. .� �' !r'' .fw'J. .
-,R - '� �� rr . � ��:����.-
_:� � s� �'
� � " Njj�.r �.

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomil Report No. FY13-WMW56
«L,
Client: Timothy (Timmy) Thomas Advisor.
Predictive
8181 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake, NC 275B3
Waste Report
Counly. Person
Un[cs to Helpful Infommation
—
Sampled: 06/25/2012 rs-akrad: 07/02/2012
Comph ted: 07/03/2012
Farm:
Sample information
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm) P (Awo
K &pm) Ca (ppm) Mg) (amm)
S (ppm) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm) Zn (vpm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm) Na (ppm) C (apm)
Sample 1D: 736L5D
Total N 34.9
1050 142 58A
400 2.60 D.16 0.79 0.81 1.58 1 B7
Waste Code: ALS
Desadptfon.
Total Kjs/dah1N 312 ----------------------
•---------------------------------
Shrine Lagoon Liq.
pH
DM (%) SS (104s/c n)
EC (mS/cm) CCE (%) ALE(1000 gal.) C:N
1> eruc N
NH" 7.74
Comments:
NOs N :. --------------------------------------------------•----•.-..-....-....-------------.---------------------...-
Otganic N N) (ppm)
Cd (ppm) Pb (vp►n) At (Awn)
Se (ppm) L) (ppm) As(Awn) Cr (vpm) C0 (ppm) Cl (ppm) M0 (Ppm)
Urea
Estimate of Nutrients Available- for First Crop (lb 11 DDO gal)
Other Elements (lb 11000 gal.)
Appttcation Method
N P205 K20 Ca Mg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Se Li
Broadcast
1.30 0.47 8.40 0,83 0.34
2.33 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 1.56
Irrigation
1.3D 0.47 8.40 0.83 0.34
2.33 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.0D 0.00 1.56
Agronomists Comments:
Completed: July 16, 2012
North Carolina
��lucau iru�t Frmd CtMlrsriw�+a
Reprogramming of the laboratory4n1ormation{managament system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank youfor using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve D-oxler, Commissioner of Agriculture.

< 461 &CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]W
Webaite: www.ncagr.govlagronomif
ReportNo.FY1344=056
Timothy (Timmy) Thomw
Page 2 of 3
Sample Information
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm)
P (ppm)
K (ppm) Ca (ppm) Mg (ppm) S (ppm) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm)
Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm) Na (ppm) C (ppm)
Sample ID: 731 LSD
Total N
37.3
992 184 54.0
25.3 3.46 0.26
.1.58 1.23 1.35 246
Waste Code. ALS
Description:
Total ifeldahlN 470
.............
-------------------
...........................
SvAne-
Lagoon Liq.
pH
OM (%) SS (10-scorn)
EC (mSJc►n)
CCE (%) ALE(1000 gal.) C:N
Inorganic N
NH4-N
8.00
Comments:
NO3-N
Organic N
Ni (ppm)
Cd (ppm) Pb (ppm) Al (ppm)
Se (ppm) Li (ppm) As (ppm) Cr (ppm) Co (ppm) Cl (ppm) MO (ppm)
Urea
_
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop (ib / 1000 gal.)
Other Elements (lb / 1000 gal.)
Appikation Method
N P205 K20
Ca Mg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo
C1 Na Ni Cd Pb Se Li
Broadcast
1.96 0.50 7.94
1.07 0.32
0.15 0.02 0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
2.05
Irrigation
1.96 0.50 7.94
1.07 0.32
0.15 0.02 0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
2.05
Sample Information
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm)
P (ppm)
K (ppm) Ca (ppm) Mg (ppm)
S (plan) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm)
Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm) Na (ppm) C (pprn)
Sample tD: 731LSS
Total N
289
981 414 194
120 172 6.20
17.8 9.31 1.99 242
Waste Code: ALS
Description:
Total Kjeldahl N 941
.............................
.................
--.............................--..
Swine Lagoon Liq.
Inorganic N
pH
DM (%) SS (10-55/cm)
EC (mS/cm)
CCE (%) ALE(I000 gal.) C.N
NH¢•N
7.60
Comments:
NO3-N
Organic N
Ni (ppm)
Cd (ppm) Pb (ppm) At (ppm)
Se (ppm) Li (ppm) As
(ppm) Cr (pprm) Co ft m) Cl fppm) Mo wpm)
Urea
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop (lb 11000 gal.)
Other Elements (Ib 11000 gal.)
Appikatton Method
N P20s, K20
Ca Mg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo
Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Se Li
Broadcast
3.92 3.86 7.85
2.41 1.13
0.70 1.00 0.03 0.12
0.06 0.01
2.02
Irrigation
3.92 3.86 7.85
2.41 1.13
0.70 1.00 0.03 0.12
0.06 0.01
2.02

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomil
Report No.
FY12SLO22028
Thomas Family Farms Inc./Jimmy
Page 2 of 60
Sample ID: 13
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (Wacre)
More
Crop
(tonstacre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Nn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1- Fes1OGITim,M
0.0
120-200 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
2-Fes/OGITim,M
0.0
120-200 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
Test Results [units - WN in gkm?; CEC and Na in meq/100 cd; NO3-N in mgldrn):
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% , Ac pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg%
S4
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-Ai
Cu-I
Na
ESP SS4 NO3-N
0.60 1.91 A 86 1.1 6.2
280 159
59 18
37
211
141
141
524
524
647
Sample ID • 14
Recommendations:
Line
Nutrients (Ib/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslaere)
N P205
Kea
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
S
Information
Lima History:
1 -Com Grain
0.0
120-160 0.
50-70
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note:_3
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 0
9D-110
0
0
0
0
0
of
Test Results [units - WN in glom;; CEC and Na in meg1100 wir ; NO3-N in mgldnf]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg%
S4
tttn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn4U
Cu-1
Na
ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.51 1.0 .9 84 1.3 6.0
234 37
63 18
39
1922
132
125
411
411
695
Sample I 15
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P206
-
K2O
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com Grain
0.0
120-100 0.
50-70
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SG/SEl: DC
0.0
90-100 0
90-110
0
0
0
0
0
Test Results [units - WN in gfemf; CEC and No in meg1100 an'; NO3-N in mgldrm?]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HIVI% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K4
Ca% Mg%
S4
' Mn4
Mn4U1
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na
ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.60 0.94 6.7 82 1.2 5.9
252 38
62 17
39
_ 164
117
110
412
412
766
Sample ID: 16
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (Ib/acra)
More
Crop
(tonsfacre)
N P206
Iw '
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-SG/SB- DC
0.0
BO-100 0-20
i00-120
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nobw3
2- 5aybearrs
0.0
0 0-20
6GM
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN In qfw?; GEC and Na In megM00 cmt; No" in mg/dnf]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K4
Ca% Mg%
84
Mn4
Mn4ki1
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cu4
Na
ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.56 0.97 8.1 88 1.0 6.1
64 35
63 23
37
94
65
65
39
39
55

MCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phans: (919) 733.26M
Website: www.neagr.gov/agranomY
Report No.
FY12-SLO22028
Thomas Family Farms Ina/Jimmy
Page 39 of 60
Sample 10: 570
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (blacre)
More
Crop
(tonstacre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lima History:
1 -Cam Grain
0.0
120-160 0
30-60
0
0
0
0
0
0
iNgta: 3
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 0
50-70
0
0
0
0
0
Mote-_3
Test Results (units - WN in glom;; CEC and Na In meg1100 cnr3; NO3-N in mgldmr :
Soil Class.
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC 136% " Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg% S4
Mn4
Mn4U1
MnAl2
Zn4
Zn4U
Cu-I
Na ESP SS4 M03-N
0.41 1.06 7.0
84 1.1 6.1
72 49
61 20 37
182
125
118
30
30
31
Sample 10: 671
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonalacre)
N P20a
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History: -
1 -Corn Grain
-0.0- -
120-160_ 20-40 _
30-50
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SGISB- DC
0.0
80-100 40-60
50-70
0
0
0
0
-0 -
- Nate-3
Test Results [units - WN in glcnf; CEC and Na In mW00 cO; NO3-N in mgldni?]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg% 34
Mn4
Mn4U1
MnAI2
Zn4
ZnAI
Cue
Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.60 0.93 7.4
78 1.6 6.0
46 50
55 20 43
298
196
189
29
29
49
Sample ID: 572
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lbI1000 sq ft)
More
Crop
(lbf1000 sq ft)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Tobacoo GH
0.0
Note 9 .5M
1.5M
0
0
0
$
0
0
�9 Daft:
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 10-36
70-90
0
0
6
0
0
Daft: 3
Teat Results [units - WN In glca?; CEC and Na In meW100 cd; NO3-N in mgldnfl:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-I
Ca% Mg% S4
- Mn4
Mn4U1
Inn Al2
Zn4
Zn4U
Cu4
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.32 1.11 6.1
87 0.8 6.4
599 44
58 26 31
121
84
77
23
23
35
Sample ID: 573
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (Iblacre)
More
Crop
(tonsfacre)
N P205
K20 '
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com Grain
0.0
120-160 30-50
50-70
0
0
0
6
2
0
Note: 3
2 - SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 50-70
90-110
0
0
$
$
0
NgIE 3 Note:
Test Results [units . WN in Bled; CEC. and Na in meg1100 CO; NO3-N In mgldr#):
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
Pd K4
Ca% Mg% S4
Mn4
Mn-All
Mn-AI2
Zn4
Zn4U
Cu4
Na ESP SS-1 K03-N
0.41 0.98 7.5
85 1.1 6.2
42 38
59 24 36
110
80
73
16
16
25

NCDABCS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Websits: www.ncagr-govlagronomV
Report No.
FY12-SLO22028
Thomas Family Farms IncJJimmy
Page 40 of 60
Sample ID: 574
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients Iblacre)
More
Crop
(tonsfacre)
N P206
KzO
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
8
Infomration
Lime History:
1-Com Grain
0.0
120-160 80-100
90-110
0
0
0
6
2
0
Note:
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 120-140 150-170
0
0
$
$
0
Notes 3
Test Results (units - WN In glad; CEC and Na In meg1100 crna; NO3-N in mgfdrr?]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% At pH
Pd K4
Ca% Mg% 94
Mna
Mn-All
Mn Al2 Zn4
Zn4U
Cwl
Na
ESP S&I NO2-N
0.46 0.99 &0
88 1.0 6.4
19 22
60 28 35
294
187
180
16
16
25
Sample ID: 575
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients jib/acre)
Mors
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
13
Information
Lime History:
1-Corn Grain
0.0
120-160 40-60
80-100
0
0
0
6
0
0
Note: 3
2 - SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-10D 60-80
130-16D
0
0
$
0
0
tl�ia � 3
Test Results [units - WN In glow?; CEC and Na in meg1100 cd; NO3-N In mgfdrr?]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% At pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn4
Mn All
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu4
Na
ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.46 0.99 8.3
88 1.0 6.4
37 25
62 25 33
335
212
205
20
20
33
Sample it); 576
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (iblacre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P205
KzO
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn Grain
0.0
120-160 60-80
90-110
0
0
0
6
2
0Note:-3
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
W10o 90-11U
160-180
0
0
$
$
0
Note: 3 Nate:
Test Results junits - WN In
glcrr?; CEC and Na in meg1100 ems; NO3-N in mgldrr]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% At pH
P-1 K4
Ca% Mg% S4
Mn4
Mn WS
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cud
Na
ESP SS4 NO"
0.46 0.97 7.0
86 1.0 6.2
27 19
61 23 28
172
117
110
14
14
22
Sample ID: 578
Recommendations:
lime
Nutrients (iblacre)
Mora
Crop
(tonsiacre)
N P20s
K20 >
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime history:
1 -Corn Grain
0.0
120-160 60-80
70-90
0
0
0
6
0
0
Noteg3
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 80-100
110-130
0
0
$
0
0
Nabe: Note: $
Test Results [units - WN in
gfcnf; CEC and Na in megfl00 cap; NO3-N in mgfdm;]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% At pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg% S4
Mnd
Mn-JU1
WAR
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu4
Na
ESP SS-1 NO3-M
0.32 LOD 8.3
88 1.0 6.4
30 31
62 24 36
202
132
125
21
21
35

NCDABCS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Website: www.neagr.gov/agmnomU
Report No.
FY12-SLO22028
Thomas Family Farms Inc./Jimmy
Page 41 of 60
Sample ID: 679
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N PtOs
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
S
Information
Lime History;
1 -Cam Grain
0.0
120-160 30-50
20-40
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 50-70
20-40
0
0
0
0
0
Nate: 3
Test Results [units - WN In glcnf; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm'; NO3-N in mgldnf]:
Soil Class
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg% S4
Mn4
Mln4U1
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na
ESP SS-1 NO3-H
0.32 0.96 7.6 87 1.0 6.1
40 6 i
60 . 24 33
134
96
89
26
26
42
Sample 1D: 580
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (blacre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
-1 -Tobacco FC
- 0.0
50-80 - - 50-70 _
10-30
0
0
0
6
0
0Note:
1
2 -SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 80-100
0
0
0
$
-0
-
0
Nglw3 Ng" -
Test Results [units - WN in gled; CEC and Na in meg1100 cm�; NO3-N in mg/duft
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac PH
P4 K4
Ca% Ug% 94
Mn4
Mn All
Mn4W
Zn4
Zn AI
Cu-1
Na
ESP SS4 NO3-N
0.22 1.04 7.2 85 1.1 6.2
32 104
52 25 33
98
66
66
23
. 23
43
Sample ID: 581
Recommendations:
Line
Nutrients (Iblacre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P105
KzO
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com Grain
0.0
120-160 W100
40-60
0
0
0
6
0
0
Nate: 3
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 110-130
60-80
0
0
$
0
0
Note: 3 ate:
Test Results [units - WN in glcd; CEC and Na In meg1100 cnO; NO3-N in mgldnil]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC 133% At pH
P-1 K4
Ca% Mg% Ss,
• Mn4
Mn-All
Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na
ESP S84 NO3-N
0.66 0.90 7.8 87 1.0 6.2
21 46
64 21 39
129
91
84
18
18
31
Sample 10: 582
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lblacre)
More -
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P205
K20:
Md
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Com Grain
0.0
120-160 50-70
90-110
0
15-20
0
6
2
0
Note: 3
2 - SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 70-M
160-180
0
0
$
$
0
Note: 3 N._ qte: $
Test Results [units, - WN in glcd; CEC and Na In megl100 arm; NO3-N in mgldmt]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg% S4
Mn4
Mn-All
MnAl2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cu4
Na
ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.46 1.03 6.3 81 1.2 6.0
35 19
58 22 25
140
101
94
16
16
17

NCDASCS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
F1113-SL00D353
7AYlAl,Client:
Thomas Family Farms Inc./Jimmy
Advisor:
M
e �• Predictive
8251 Oxford Rd
T
Timberlake, NC 27583
x Soil Report
Mehlich-3 Extraction
Couniy.
Person
senqad: 06272012 a
completed:07l022012
Farm.
Links to Helpful information07/022012
Sample ID. 01
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients )alacre)
More
Crop
(Wnslacre)
N P205
K20
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Sud/Sorg Sil
0.0
18D-220 '100
100
0 0
0
0
0 0
Note: 12
2.00 tons/acre. 4.00/2,W2
2-SG1SB- DC
0.0
80-100 120
60
0 0
0
0
0 0
flute: 3
Test Results [units - WN 1n g1m?; CEC and Na in meg1100 cnrr; NO3-N in mgldms]:
"Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W!V CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg% S4
Mn4
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu-i Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.41 0.94 6.6 79 1 A 5.3
22 49
57 19 63
202
138 131
34
34
31 0.1
2
Sample ID: 02
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lislacre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P206
K20
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Sud/Sorg Sil
0.0
180-220 110
90
0 0
0
0
0 0Note:
12
2.00 tonslacre; 4.002,012
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-100 140
60
0 0
0
0
0 0
Nola: 3
Test Results [units - W!V in glcni; CEC and Na in meg1100 cn?; NO3-N in mgldnf ):
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K4
Ca% Mg% ' S4
Mn4
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu4 Na ESP SS4 NO3-N
0.51 0.99 6.3 71 1.8 5.0
16 52
52 15 73
208
142 135
51
51
33 0.1
2
Sample ID: 03
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (iWacre)
More
Crop
(tonslacne)
N P205
K20
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Sud/Sorg Sil
0.0
180-220 140
110
0 0
0
0
0 0Note:
12
2.0D tonsiacr+e; 4.002,01;
2-SG/SB- DC
0.0
80-10D 180
90ti .
0 0
0
0-
0 0
N. ote: 3
Test Results [units - WN in glcn?; CEC and Na in meg1100 crr?; NO3-N In mg/daft
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC 138% Ac pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn4
Mn4U1 Mn-Al2
Zna
Zn4U
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.36 0.95 5.7 79 1.2 5.3
5 41
57 18 70
160
113 106
40
40
29 0.1
2
North -Carol Ina
imam« TIUM FUw cm1w%AW
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxfer, Commissioner of Agriculture

fflta6ia, Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomll
Report No.
FY13-SL000353
Thomas Family Farms Inc./Jimmy
€ age 2 of 3
Sample ID: 04
Recommendations:
Lima
Nutrients OWacre)
More
Crop
(tonstacre)
N P20S
KzO
Mg
S
Mn •
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-SudlSorg Sil
0.8
IM220 130
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
2- SGIS B- DC
0.0
80-100 170
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in glcrr?; CEC and Na In meg1100 cd; NO3-N in mgldn?]:
Soil Class%
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg% 84
Mn4
Mn-AN
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.41 0.94 6.0 76 1.4 5.2
7 42
55 18 71
198
136
129
37
37
28
0.1
2
Sample ID: 05
Recommendations:
Lima
Nutrients (Ihlacre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N Paoa
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-SudlSorg Sil
1.3
180-220 120
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note, 12
-
2 - SGISB- DC --
0.0
80-100 160.
.60
--0
0 _
0 _..
_ 0
0-
0
-Note; 3
Test Results [units - WN in giant; CEC and Na in meg1100 cd; NO3-N in mgldnol-.
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% AAg% S4
Mn4
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.51 0.98 6.1 67 2.0 5.0
10 49
48 15 61
427
273
266
54
54
34
0.1 "2
Sample ID: 06
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients bJacre)
More
Crop
(tonsiacre)
N P203
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lima History:
1-Sud/Sorg Sit
0.8
180-220 120
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
2- SGISB- DC
0.0
80-100 160 -
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN In glcd-, CEC and Na in meg1100 cn?; M03-N in mg/drift
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K4
Ca% Mg% Sd
Mn4
Mn-AI7
Mn AI2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na ESP
SSd NO3-N
0.60 0.92 8.9 81 1.7 5.5
10 51
56 22 45
1187
729
722
104
104
98
0.1
1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 23, 1998
Timmy Thomas
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC 27583
ffl.1?W,A .
IT 0 0
NCDENR
NORTH C,AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS730010
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Person County
Dear Timmy Thomas:
In accordance with your application received on August 6, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jimmy & Timmy Thomas, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Thomas Farms Pork Inc., located in Person
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 260 Farrow to Finis_ h and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC. and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS730010
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
2
Page
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sinc rely,
.• Cam- ���
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Person County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Person County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -Central Files
Permit File-NDPU

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 21, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNIP REQUESTED
Timmy Thomas
Thomas Farms Pork Inc.
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC 27583
ITi �lkfW,A
�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. �7�."aSo�ON
AdditionallnfsFi Vgnlkequest
Thomas Far stl'ork inc.
Animal WaA�FOperatiT .r )
Person County
Dear Timmy Thomas: hat90ps��i��
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has received additional information regaitAii g the subject application.
Further information is required before we can continue our review. Please address and submit the following
information by November 20, 1998:
1. Your waste utilization plan appears to be written for a two-year rotation. The summary table on Page
5 and 6 of your revised waste utilization plan shows a huge deficit that is not so if you account for
two year's worth of plan available nitrogen produced on the farm. Please revise the summary table
and show the actual amount of deficit that occurs over the two-year period.
Please note that all revisions or amendments made to the waste utilization plan (WUP) or a
portion thereof are required to be signed and dated by both the landowner and the Technical
Specialist before they are submitted for review.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The
information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before November 20, 1998 or the Division will return
your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to
be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR Joshi.
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

i�
1. Your waste utilization plan appears to be written for a two-year rotation. The summary table on Page 5 and
6 of your revised waste utilization plan shows a hugh deficit that is not so if you account for two year's
worth of plan available nitrogen produced on the farm. Please revise the summary table and show the
actual amount of deficit that occurs over the two-year period.
As you can see from the tables below, calculations were made for the total amount of PAN produced
according to RYE. The tables show the two year rotation with the various crops (corn -wheat -fescue hay in that order)
being planted. Actual volume planned to be pumped equals 222,776 cu. ft. and the required volume to be pumped
is 201,209 cu. ft. Therefore, 201,209 cu. ft. x 7.48 gal/cu- ft. = 1,505,043.32 gallons. According to the NCDA waste
analysis report (W01043 W) a total of 2.1 lbs. of nitrogen per 1000 gallons of swine lagoon liquid pumped. Therefore,
1,505 x 2.1 Ibs.11000 gallons = 3,160.50 lbs. PAN for six months storage. For one year storage 3,160.50 x 2 = 6,321
lbs./yr. Therefore, 6,321 lbs. of nitrogen produced per year for this facility according to the current waste analysis
report. Therefore, 6760 lbs. of actual PAN needed is more than the 6, 321 lbs. of nitrogen actually applied from the
waste analysis data. Also, once a vegetation is established on the additional 8.149 acres cleared, this will be
amended to the WUP as available crop land for waste application.
I hope this helps explain your question concerning the Thomas Farms (Allensville Unit) swine operation. If
you have any questions contact Joey Knight with NCCES or Jim Huey with NRCS. Thanks.
Thomas Farms Allensville Unit
Amendment to WUP
Application No. 73-0010
Total PAN/yr - 6760
CORN - March - June
(1st Year Spring)
Tract
Field
# / PAN
T111
2
605
4
399
5
1499
7
756
8
701
T3210
1
866
2
454
3
110
Additional acreage that was cleared that was not included
in calculations
TOTAL
5390
5390 # (PAN used on Spring Com crop) + 1370 # (PAN used on Fall Wheat crop) = 6760 # (1st year
PAN)

N
WHEAT - October - March
(use 1370 in Fall) (1st year Fall)
(use remainder 3806 in next Spring) (2nd year Spring)
Tract
Field
# I PAN
T111
2
581
4
383
5
1439
7
726
8
673
T3210
1
832
2
436
3
106
Additional acreage that was cleared that was not included
in calculations
Total
5176
FHH - August - October
(use in Fall after Wheat) (2nd Year Fall)
Tract
Field
# 1 PAN
T111
2
440
4
290
5
1090
7
550
8
510
T3210
1
630
2
330
3
80
Additional acreage that was cleared that was not Included in
calculations
TOTAL
3920
* Used in Fall after Wheat 3920 # PAN therefore, 6760 # - 6726 # = 34 # short
we ee5
(Land ner) Achpicalpecialist) (s) (Date)

i.�
1,
3.1
General Permit
coy,
r
OF p7y

,1
3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available fora plic ion (ex uding all required buffers and areas of covered by the application
S / /�/O �: �i L � l�r C1.0 .� G' r {_,1! �. ! Cj; r t?rA.:if. ✓ ti K'� �S� ,J Wriry ti✓ i'i i
system): Required Acreage (as liste� in the AWMP): <24.30
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): �^
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or J0 (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? ES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
S . E jor NO (please circle one)
1 a .,
���� � T f�1C, j� �" i.+ % 1 9 i l7" ; J lsi:?G' J
What waste e that t �s facility s swore houses an lagoon were sited . �u : W
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? ReE,%;A i' 1
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
33.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.39 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.I 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 73 -10
Applicants Initials

Facility Number: 73 - 10
Facility Name: Thomas Farms
WAU F v cO
S�GJr�N
G 1996
Non. � •„�
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: —�
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be ret med to me as i complete.
Signature /fyjfx%r-) k 50�77.0� Date 1� &
5. MANAGTR'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accarate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 73 -10

� 1 1'VOIt'1115��tr-n�►s -�mE'W Ifr � IYn.+,u 1 h6rng5
R a T 75-10
V� p4lif~Ilpw .
„ ; y GENTRYS 'O
t■ -AiniE STORE
s 404 Ja,D y, ° 40
w `3
�. IF Poo
,[[,. 4 'y [ C
� r -LAK fir" TRp►Tes n E i ^ 1,C �= � f � '
tnA►E4 ^cmu area ` a
40
+r ti
FIV I1011TN[N0 - i ./a{S / 'r' .
da
ISId �: o o ''+y, 'roaL 4p
RD FORKS ... ■LACE ► �, o
o=bupNRp L +.y r
LONG
w RKS �'v 49 3�,Q rAppclr aAupNr Ap 4n 'o ' 4•'+. �p
t1,L111Gn
to p, 1aN36 Y[IikOMNllI
SM � iiM 0 '
L' 4q 4 z >V
, ♦ C4
I� �" t� � tAlt[r tom° ° �r � ♦ rih +° x • �.�
° b
rL
All661 y fA p F%
p 4r
40 XBORO 4 GENTRY
p NT
N ALLENSVILLE
Ta1N R = y t ° F
•LLt,,S",LLr. t rc ` DENNY
Cf aK 640v[ CN°RCN r Y �
STORE
p O
�Eph fads b
p� °° p BROOKSOALE OLD Autn,vl4LE C ? nM`t nuF1z w =rOde
+ P 157 i Vetop = ,snn4tn
C .� g .,N.UAk" a f,0
A. i rjr+ � et •
o r o t
= MIT HaKp E
N - '14LEr ' JW
�twn Rb I'Os SU R yR x
�.FEEDS
�STORE
o J .°
158YNES r
°
TAVERN �* 'o o41i■rrT � . � ,itµ � � 14 e .
n5 N Ap '. nu Op[aA e s O•• 4jTLTr AD
ipyrnYE AO ` _ T t -r* ,Td 4pOAf �O h y f 'ryi +'4lll Yi
W
es
.EVEL NOAn oav'f "O'• '; • 'rf : 4p CN4Np u M1 f
Hokr ° ifR Pic % F p
N °M,f # Y SPIT
IP
CN
00 r0 1rV c oa[ltT R
�Nw° '� !yawo = °° r E
c4r[r Nit? �fi p+r
Srtl frVi '[[ III �V°
t ■r�*° AI'C#i *OpyO CLOAII-CIIE[li �Op q, p
z
boy �4 ■° 5T 7 n p i
i u m e
GC rl�l �40 t` t "apw lwps = u
LO00 RO t 4b NEL[NA •r° �r PIE A°F �} 4�(i p•`•C 4 Iri• COVlIN Ap t 4
`� p +� jWw ECHOM NO 7 oe� w''p
a'NI TFIELO A �•p l e A,, ORT • ■[TNANY r Q l,�,tL Irtl NWALIEl llb
,
T
TI EERLAKE ° U r,,MrTiRZAH k ,a
} t0,1 OAKLEY „b qp
Y •I 0 AD w0 w tpM
REAFIELD Rp 111 f ■ 0
ii1• � L�y� Lpo► ��� L�i�' 'p ■
r �t'fFPFIp qM1 1fE1 [ °A i �1 .
5 TEA RO .L RAC[ 11yj 1p ENA■MIGAIL000 rk O OWE
LW 1d0�t w 4p
+., ORIAN
Cc dNDRiw 4b M if rOO�r C v u
' p ►fn4ty 11b
,gO�TH ,lot ° - #
"Ar rr `
SG1 RrF1014
l ,ts40 N[LfN4.
CEAY E p r q ■JRTOn IT■■ : ,y ° i ■rpA/, [
.a4lt NINCn(fTEIIR IY
W1441E t,36
I I10 ° T' p iT =
[w4AT F . �� T M1pad1 • i 51 1tl :� ►� 7 Ai ff1E ITS IVIrN 4p ' p
' O jl ASTAEE 1
9 +,. .... ..... .'� ........ i W o
r....... .14 O
• ......... .... .......
2 sc i n i i A tie n n it M T V

�� 41
,f
1 \
S.R. 1598
5R. IS47
549 ;' —
h !
11 a
It I !r
I
if
�4 ,4
4t ��
4`
44
K
11

zw 73 - O
'�' ^a-r ��2•• •r N_Y.�i .F ��s;.. a �w� ;q-.3=�,, e 1
"�rs• y -k� �+'�'dh.•i?'.a �� ''- -.•t lC�`+G-ti � t^•� J -1 ir.^�• `�•.. �,'., �A �•r'f• fi l "la,•'�': �
"�'T" ��'''•� r�r��}^a :.�� � t •M''"�t`"5i'-:h,wr.� •+' r `'y.r J 7�. �.. t [ J� •� l''� 5���
�yx:: �P ;�p�jy.",���, _ �'���,sy'�.,.Kr+,.'4� �..�•��'�ii /; .Q� �'?r rr h•Z,'� � Ir?'7�v►
`.-` "� i �• . `�3i_- I D 't t r� t ,e} �; �jJ ` � ` � .e,.: r• . Rom,:
t-�C`,:'� 4 ��.'� ��`aa.�j "` � � aK.ti a' �,�� . , � �y r� „� � ..,�vt.l .�,z�y�,�„�„y.�� y���•�! �� ! �� �.+ �� /
"�tr ;r(J',%Y�/..... .�,�y. .%y:hc ..r►�fi i" � � ,•.RFf�w? €1"�A;' _� �?,v t �>• ,�:� ,,,►,r.%p�i� �[ ''��-.
'yx `:*+"�E . -- •v ���� ��ad�^^ 4:M�,,,�,,�� yy�~��}_:,1'w✓L�r�}(a�"� kSa� •;',�"•`yyt �,"^.� ��,. ��,- � �'t.,F../�. .� ��•1'•�'�wir��
..k ••,} j���.:i••'{•••' sx: r :�Y < j`!�fi�'�':i R*it'�k..y,, [ '�.r+�, rs.,�{_ yr r. .•fie
Yf� { � t�L •� � ra`a.•F� � �J �Af'""+ y�� y ' .x' �ryt S`r r CL.TT�"+�'i"N a,• _. � �:. w i t /1 -H. ih•r. 1r� ••` `
tt11( v LSI'Cl-�`•�, r_ '7�, r- < nkL �,{: r ..ir°•i : - 4,e.y �"3 r'�. '],�i °'�.;r f •. ' 1 • C�
� ��. •M .-.+` ��,;� ..� �-}``''�fl� s- ,. '�;tt'"• ''- ;�, Z� 1 - r,•.,'r'.x ,;;A'`-i' 'b� •'�—r;�: t `` � gr � �� • � �":
r ♦411ft'�t�^�..��it r•5t�}r+ $p" r ��rc1.5� �f r .il .� s q'-t�/4 r,• ��!+t� '.1 4R ^�;
"1 .r •ki" [i., "•�' �:r•.;,R tr` .4� y„".C? 't'i - ` r f�yi .6`�•' - r. �+s� /•. �.
�7'.•. - 1 S � ""!r'" �`..:`»g4 far '�'..q� r, t .r �,�.�? a� ° r- s, t �r�c Arc R,;,,
ii f ;ar l2h''> f r ''`�$ryy '•1rx , v at,". 'P'"F" ,�' $`�dr'(y•" Ya f . �4 ...; _ ....,.1, • ti'�Cli.l ` l"V-
V.,", ,r .t
"j'` �•/..�; +wrap r } 'tyYh°FfxF .•�s-.'fr., T•'•4t:.� _.-....'...
•��� �Q'?". 1 z�.c" » a+�k ,�,�^'.yr t'� ��"Y°+a"�4 t •y € eT"„�c���` wre,.r :ir'�tt Y•v
•'-,1 { • V' �a$. �^.C.r • tt ,ram, t '<°o".'..,_rrr'r 'r .,•' z .. '•f' ���/// '^43 _
-A -` 1aGf t , µ� r`� � e. •%! 't+,�'.tL�' �.";-E.� -�Z�i° s :..- 4rt.c*,�,;,. �,.. ! i4r �� �. •*�
•r'R::' i � � ���. S'd� a' .Sy_�s 'r r r r rr a ter _ � '>� Ao--.,;� �.�ti: �.�' '��
ie•h�. ,/•_ •.t. �•"'e.•, sC• a, ti.a•*•5. eESr tL .A r. t�.L� W 1- 1 t •�is� r;.IiJ`i 1.. ,l l•.
xrg�ri
z s °,''� �r��/ .d -s r+�,`.�r,. ' 2 L!i•,��t .�-• it�r�
1,9 T.�4� ,�A ids T i' ., t;, ti+ 54X / y✓.,�0.' `p Ya. _ �� `' ;� 1
�tin:� r' � �• �^' t - •i'u�;F;�.+'�,,�'- ��� ti � ������° n�', • j4r-Ma"",# d'r n x'�t,::� '�' ,.,r.• " t��• �'�"�f'"1 ,� w r ..�.
i'r•. - ti -.=i ✓�"QG x F�1 •• j�.La;"•€i c. ..,,"; .'� f�.•, � f:• �
... _,:v-a -. ' .�"„ '� -c• � � t� pit =: �..'� � w.,"P.r fir. .�. _ _ _
''�`!'+.; ••� ;1 i Aµ.+ � a��'s. !.� . � ��.'S j}` � f '��.1�+f. � •,:s � � • �(C • ` y• ; 1' Q ,•1•r,'t.,� �
77.
'ter•- ^� �`�•"--a• a"a'� .�rr.?� R`4'�. �+ •.. �'�• '� � •� �'y�'�C1j�•�•+.r'�' -' _ r .� (.�'+ r >4 r _ ` �,
"�' ` ,� ' 1 •�� f�}iJJ'' R ro�f:� • .r
r � +� j � z;. .� r L5."� S r t 'it• v ,.� 4•„F+'a .r { $�' .T ✓ :4
: *:�. '3� b�:. � sF a q, t w a• �y �'yr."* a y�- sZ- I
r'`• k 5 `� ¢ ,%t 1 - t~y".- i •.� _aS:i "•p:. e`�.+iy '^'["�•:`[["i,!�.ii4++.�• f�ff�•.
t jCr \'• ci rp ty, r , e6ryt tv r' + ' : n-3 wj �•, f rlT $?i
Ar '3'aa.��. A , q
=`• ��; � i-� "'i ^ f• �''' aR i'{irc•,..n "'�irt' i^" �}'-",�,�p�;fJ.. }�� r'Y. i;�^' �* � c?�•'/���. .'�,..
.'i.- .•:•.-t`� * 'fit,.y .! • }} �y Sys, iJ„j r"• /�� f`�- .� AAi ` j• �. frr,t,
w � Y dTfr : r r �1�,/-• ., t � ^'T ,h.�"; Ft •:iiC'�'%'r'" `r.i / � #�z^.ti
"`1..' ��*•ri / "r 1.. + ''•g.�J, �1� ` � t !�•^�„�n �� }��•r .-.r I }� y. x., �ts•+� 0.#!i ` ,- � .'
�- 1... s3:` •y.i.� 9, _F3srp. '3T.^ ',l__vi_%:7'""" �. .. �t": 5�-} 13•w /
'��' � �.' • '*�i`rs";,•>x Wg'�."~/ !� `vf�•,t: �����s��f�'� ' t���ft �Y.WR :;I �•wr ��C �>$- Y.�_ 4R,
•`. •^"1-.w9P-'+'�8t7.taE llt >.•� f '` �s .,r 4'�!'�Mt� Y r 'Now,
qi n �. �-'•, j% V
�Irr' •..5.'�' �� dry�ryY^t r r rWa -1 4r-f
�a,
lie
?',gr1 a� �'R'¢�''• ' r i` ,��'�t+�`. t'' �" � ,i':7'. ��� � � a �r�'r+�` M w l"�' 'g` te/ r „�"r '
''•'w'**'' �.Py��..rt` � `'-; r, '�, ��S y�`{„. «,�y "�, f 'a; 1��.� 119r •• t ,.� ,J�
'�e.t i4t �" t ,:.���- er�f+ � f�t a�,,x, R- � • •"` • �•�" � °fir` ��r '" •,.�- ��w./t
-r�" sf �. w`r a r"a - `;,.'r ',ci�� irF�o • • �' 'r-' 31 � •�_� '•"'�'v. �t +w.
7 ", �./ n+.yv L ,• "',r LArJd oqDpl e-AT"o[J
"'.+•a . *:� .St,. _ raj-! , ��,. •7^1.� t ,. 1 ! i � YNf••
Y
1•� �.: w4"'•y.f: 'yv � ,I� � .` � ^_ 'a« P
T'f'• y /�V ,t,; s�'..� i'syr,ry. ^ if°y 1 l l I I•--� 111MA5 �R I'n•.S �FPtd"� A4I'L�f
i'•,r' a _• .� �! ry r w •'s 's �y
t y r
�"'' �`� "s + �1 � ^ N Y ' � �� ��t.���.w.s.'""r�,,�¢ �;,'S�.�� �/d. � � �OO 1. Y"7 • ®�• 3 � a D, r� i4 a - r � ..�. �
,�}}���� '�r:, -! .. - -fit f�A :t��'.:t�a ` � fir' �;, R'� � But,�•e�rs .✓erdaW�[.J
- Y � .. f •i 'p• �� Y./ �id/. ;' S ;i T 3 .Z 1 O , !� a n+ R , rArrr,rY'aa-
t;�c:lst: I•, • `s�f) Y 'a ?t r1 d. +2 - Is a C • �!'. .Z 5
, .:.. zs. �..••- i'T'` l''\ r • • rr,r"7 ;`;/r' pM",, - .. ND 34cgilrr lVee-Jed [AJ
qo
T3�i°
0 .
r �La. T� lei

Ai,
Animal Waste L'VIanaaement Plan Certification
tPlease tyot or print all information that doe; not require a si�i. ature)
E.istinQ : or Y;iVe�ti::=�'pX ..Ended ''(please circie:orte)'
General Information:
Name of Farm` -I �o tit p� s _ FArrn5 A(l P 6)sQ, �e � -� L. - - Facility No: 7a - I C
Owner(s) Name::S,mm u Phone No: I10 4X 4-,z4. 33
Mailing
Farm Location: County_ Farm is located
• Latitude and Longitude: 3f 2I's 0-0 I �86 .54` :24" Intenratar:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location. identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Operation Description:
Type of Sivine Na. of:tnitnals
:� wean to Feeder
Ct Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean
D Farrow to Feeder
-M Farrow to Finish a(go .TaL'
❑ GiIts
* Boars
Type of Pou ry
D Laver
J Pullets
Wo_ 7'Afibnais
Type of Cartle No. bf Animals
Dairy
D Beef
Other Type of Livestock:, Munher of Animals:
'•'•>�. .,,.s}- <:r..�:2k::rEy. _ }_, -ti':�c :': r:; r.. ;,-krc ., r£:..��^::?:_=:i.:.:.;. -r;h ,� �' _
S.. ?. S r � � J�tlt+a w��i k' a.. x i �_- '>T Sw- t'�Ya k �-�%'k'#:ffi'fi � Y✓ a�"P�>4ia ' - ,r � � Pre.7ous•Desr`zn.Cc`taactr..:. �:V<N..-••.xFrlddstrdisat.Desrea:Ca�araty.. ToraI':Desrun�C�7nacin.. $�:�
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage: LAVA; AB"F Ac. - Ko : ��
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds: % Total Capacity: 6T&— 3&4 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: 'ES or NO (please circle one)
$Prow, L'all¢t�ca,.�
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the L #GOOL r SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
�k ak ilex i1t ie ht as atMMyc a!t fk tt*kia X�at ar iµ jt i�st ie is is iii i,+a;�i,�Mit sa rc i.. i,. ia, ra ya aeya as ai.i.r.as,.t,�i,<istsea;�ri�[fe[;eicraiate ai is i,�ais�;aim as is ie�i�Y,e as s,. a,ia in :a
Owner I Manager A;reement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changin'7. I (we) understand the operation '
and maintenance procedures established in the approved anirtial waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the esistins design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental N•lanagement before the new animals are stocked. I understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state tither directly through a man-made
convevance or from a storm event less severe than the 2-5--year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from die
application of animal waste. i (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using. technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Consmadon Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and eater Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementadon. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DELI or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a tide transfer.
tiTame of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
`lame of Nlana;er(i[ different tr m own_):
i
Signature: _ ,.� ?ram _ Date:
a1t'C -- August 1. 1997• 62 l

Aft
Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the ;north Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC bF .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste rrianaeement system for the farm nutted above has aft animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and•specitications of the Division of -Environmental Management
(DE NI) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
`forth Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission -pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 5F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, 51, WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storane. Treatment Svstem_
Check rite appropriate box
: 1 Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD) A4^- i
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but nut limited to collection syscems. aJA ns and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Natne of Technical Specialist (Please Print): RA,t3-r_ vi4AJS
Affiliation UJ PA - Rc- Date Work Completed: 8 -/
Address (Agency):!eoor D CARIrA ,DR, Ai•F&AI /d L 276ro _Phone No.:!2Z x6
Signature: Date: 1/-AP- F7
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
dame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): U�
Affiliation � N M55 Date Work Completed: -/ 9
3c't s. ►rto�yR,. ;t - R-��ys�r17
Address (Agency): � �C_, - ���r��rt/s.,xs13 _Phone No.: V-s4�-����
Signature:
Q Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate bo.r
�E Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Date: -/ - f 7
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliatio
Address ( Agency):,
Signature:
A%VC .- Au st 1. t997
ate Work Completed:
Phone No.:9io --y7-a973
Date: &,III-9�-9�-

D). Apolication and Handling Equipment
0wck the appropriate box
Existing nr s a ding facility with existing waste.inolicodon equirmen (W P or I)
Animal waste application equipment sptc:ified in the plan has been zither field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can corer the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are c.-ntained as part of
:he plan).
D Nety, extanded, or existing facility without exi5iing waste application equipment for snrav irrigndon. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan. (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: caiibrttion and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
-:) New. expanded- nr existing facility without existing waste-,molicnticm eauinnient for lnnd snre_aciina not usinu
spay irrigntism. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan. (proposed application equipment can, cover the area required- by the —
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
­comained as part of the plan).
rarne,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 01E4
Affiliation Al C C es Date Wort Completed:_ _ / -- a 6' 97
3. /»o/y•r 5l n,. /Ia
t;
Address (Agency): Kob Ara lllC_ ".7S73 _Phone No.: 33(o
Signature: Date:1��/f� �97
E) Odor Control. insect Control. 'Mortality ytana�Zernent and Emeraenev Action Plan (SD
Si. WUP. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency :fiction Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Nlom-dity Manaetment. Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Vey t,rQ
Affiliation /1/CC'4�-5—I e%So co, 25 Sewl Date Work Completed:_ l/~a 6-- Z7
Co, d7l.T.,ce- ���.
Address (Aeencti- cr�io�n ivc_ ��rs� Phone No.: /cD
Si�_nature: _ ', Date: %)-S— 97
F) Written Notice of New or Exp2ndiml Swine Farm
The fofIoving signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 31. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
wbo own property located across a pu tic road. sweet- Or highway from this new or expanding swine farm- The notice was
in compliance with the requirements f N' �GS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners nodfied is
attached. �l
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of'Mann-er f
owner):
Date:
Siznature: ' _-'4 l ' Date:
AWC -- Au-ust 1. 1997 3

w
I. I. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storaf7e. Treatment Installation ,
New. exnanded or retrofitted facility (SO
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): F�Aa)K E4,AJs
Affiliation >A=—/u9c.S Date Work Completed: V
Address (Agency): 4.aal p C4,VM D2. _AI_t.�1eAJ_. 4JL 2941Q_ Phone �+o.:_%r4-2.so
Signature: .rz,. Date:_/t—/8-P'7
B) Land application Site (tiYL"P)
Check-theappropriate. box-
1 The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vesetadon as specified in the plan by (montblday/}•ear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 34 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Marne of Technical Specialist (Please Print):ILI-5__ nev , , a li t
Affiliation kols_ c�gDate Work Completed:./� /9- 9*7
y 304 5. r I t2� g&A-Aae2 r� A St I j 1 h
Address (Agent ): � �,�.�;�o u C. � _,��, �Phane 1\10.: 9/0 - s9 -
Signature
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
i (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DENT a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar days followitis the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that Wiure to submit this verification is a violation of tits waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DENI.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Nianager (if diffe
Signature:
A%VC august 1. 1997
Date:
Date:

C) Runoff Controls frorn Exterior Lots
Facilitv with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of p 1
in the plan_ /'
For facilities
dame of Technical Specialist
Affiliatio
Address (agency):
SignaEUre:
(RC)
cants front lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
lots, no certification is necessary.
Date Work Completed:
Phone No.:
Date:
D) Apolication and HandlinZ Eguiament Installation (WUP or I)
Check the ❑opropriare block
`''E Animal waste application and handling equipment. specified in the plan is o:: site and ready for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained'as part of the plan.
J ,animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the wvncr
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can- be maintained: calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in die plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation f^ CES Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): o,rh�,.� Phone N 334
SiLmature:
Date: /�2--/8 r97
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DELI a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within I5 calendar days following the date specified in die conditional certification. I
(we} realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation or the waste management plats and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Marne of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and_Mortality Mana`ement (SD. St. WUP. RC or 1)
ttitethods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. Tne
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ U�-'v n�
Affiliation NCCz�s n.CoService Date Work Comnleted: //�a�—�
PrSo n Co . O �' 'GG g . 3 Sr .S. Md J4-.
Address (agency): aP�,kb, o �• _NC— ,��s - Phone �fo-:
Signature:
atvC -- .kugust 1. 1997
Date: .I- —S = 7

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Nl;anagement Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with vour Animal Waste Management Plan.
a.
AIVC -- August 1. 1997 6

1
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN- A LewNso c
For- 2 cir. rotin+_ ;aN of j `lr. for
FWH z 2.o4ro,JS/�. f eY 41
Producer: Jimmy & Timmy Thomas
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC 27581
910-364-2633
Existing Farrow to Finish
260.00 sows
,Now G 1996
Sw�.rie� ��
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
' days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
260 sows x 19.9 tons waste/sows/year = 5174 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
260 sows x 26 lbs PAN/sows/year = 6760 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN _w
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
•
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
111
2
ApB
C
110
137.5
1.4
192.5
I
MAR, JUN
ll.l
ApB
IS
jI
1110
1137.5 I
10.9
1123MA.75
R, JUN
111
4
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
11.1
1151.25
MAR, JUN
111
ApB
1-5
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
11.4
1192.5
MAR, JUN
ill
ApB
Ill
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
13.2 1440
MAR, JUN
111
7
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
13.5. 1481.25
MAR, JUN
111
8
ApB
I-C
I
1110
1137-5 1
14.1 1563.75
MAR, JUN
111
9
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
11.6 1220
MAR, JUN
3210
1
ApB
1
I-C
I
1110
1137.5
14.9 1673.75
MAR, JUN
111
2
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
11.6 1220
MAR, JUN
3210
3
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5 1
10.6 182.5
MAR, JUN
111
ApB
1-2
JW
I
155132
1
11.4 11-84.8
NOV,MAR
111
�2
ApB
FHH
2.0
I
1100
11.4 1140
AUG-OCT
1
ApB
1-3
JW
I
155
1132 1
10.9 1118.8
NOV,MAR
Page:
3

•
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
lbj
LQOIP
��
u5
yiClg
-��
ill
FHH
90
1-3
JApB
I
12.0
[100
1 10.9
AUG-OCT
.111
ApB
1-4
JW
I
155
1132
1 11.1
1145.2
NOV,MAR
r111
ApB
FHH
1-4
T
12.0
1100
1 11.1
1110
AUG-OCT
ill
ApB
1-5
JW
I
155
1132
1 11.4
1184.8
NOV,MAR
ill
ApB
FHH
1-5
T
12.0
�100
11.4
1140
AUG-OCT
ill
ApB
1-6
JW
I
155
1132
1 13.2
1422.4
NOV,MAR
ill
ApB
FHH
1-6
T
12.0
1100
1 13.2
1320
AUG-OCT
ill
7,
ApB
F
JW
I
155
1132
1 13.5
1462
NOV,MAR
111
ApB
FHH
1-7
1
I
12.0
1100
1 13.5
1350
AUG-OCT
ill
ApB
1-8
JW
I
155
1132
1 14.1
1541.2
NOV , MAR
ill
ApB
FHH
1-8
I
12.0
1100
1 14.1
1410
AUG-OCT
ill
ApB
1.6
1-9
JW
I
155
1132
1
1211.2
NOV,MAR
ill
ApB
FHH
1.6
1-9
T
12.0
1100
1
1160
AUG-OCT
3210
1-1
ApB
JW
155
1132
1 14.9
1646.8
I
NOV,MAR
3210
ApB
FHH
4.9
490
I
�2.0
1100
1
AUG-OCT
3210
ApB
1.6
211.2
1-2
JW
I
�55
1132
NOV, MAR
10
ApB
FHH
�2.b_
Iloo
I
1.6
I
1160
1-2
I
AUG-OCT
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3210 1-3 1ApB fZ �55 �132
3210 1-3 jApB FHH 12.0 1100
I
END
I
0.6 179.2
NOV, MAR
0.6 160
AUG-OCT
TOTAL18978.85
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
■
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
C
CORN
BU
1.25
FHH
FESCUE - HAY
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BU
2.4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 24.3 8978.85
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2
TOTAL
O
24.3
C
8978.85
*** BALANCE 1-2218.85 j
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1118 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5590
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 18.6333333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 44.72 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
ill
2
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
ill
2
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
111
3
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
ill
4
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
ill
5
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
ill
6
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
ill
111
7
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
9
ApB
C
.45
*2.65
ill
�2
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.6
111
�2
ApB
W
.45
*2.15
ill
y3
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.6
111
�3
ApB
W
.45
*2.15
111
�4
ApB
FHH
.45
*2.15
111
M4
ApB
W
.45
*2.15
ill
X5
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.6
ill
�5
ApB
W
.45
*2.15
111
�6
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.6
111
�6
ApB
W
.45
*2.15
111
�7
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.6
1
�7
ApB
W
.45
*2.14
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ill
-8
ApB
FHH
.45
ill
"8
ApB
W
.45
111
9
ApB
FHH
.45
ill
"9
ApB
W
.45
3210
1
ApB
C
.45
3210
3
ApB
C
.45
3210
"1
ApB
FHH
.45
3210
`1
ApB
W
.45
3210
�2
ApB
FHH
.45
3210
�2
ApB
W
.45
3210
ApB
FHH
.45
3210
-3
ApB
W
.45
*1.6
*2.15
*1.6
*2.15
*2.65
*2.65
*1.6
*2.15
*1.6
*2.15
*1.6
*2.15
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of'the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This operation consists of 1 retrofitted lagoon designed for a 260 sow farrow tc
finish operation. There is one abandoned lagoon on site that is planned to be
closed out in 1998. Cost -share has been approved for the closure and a waste
utilization plan will be followed. Until the lagoon is closed, the operator must
maintain the waste level from going above the 25 year/1 day storm pump stake.
The operator should also never allow the water level in the retrofitted lagoon
to go above the start pump stake. Always stop waste application immediately
should runoff occur. -During construction of retrofitted lagoon, a small
underground spring was hit when cutting the core. A 411 perforated plastic pipe
(with gravel & geotextile cloth) was laid starting at the core and extending
beyond the back toe of the dam. The outlet of this pipe should be protected fron
obstructions to prevent water from backing up into pipe. If there are any
changes planned for the operation that affect the Animal Waste Management Plan,
the operator should contact a technical specialist or the Person SWCD
beforehand.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to -areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILUATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Thomas Farms
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Jimmy & Timmy Thomas
(Please print)
Signature- 12,1�4j,,eAte:
Name of Manager (I f different from owner) :
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Jim Huey
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-597-2973
Address (Agency): 304 S. Morgan St. Rm 126
Roxboro NC 27573
Signature: Date: /g 19-97
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
, a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
Notary Public.
(SEAL)
Page: 17

Attachment B
Page 1 of 3
North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service
Agri -Waste Mmnagement
Biologi=l mid F. O=ring Ivor Ca=I&= Sty univ ty
LTP£S= W= SAt9=G, AbiAI=1 AND CALCUr�=17
4F IAM A2_"1rZC =21 BA
.lames C. Barker*
.tf a 31r*-!• .rr1.r:l
AL Semi -Solid Lot Mmmare
L. Soaped ditectlp from lot into spreadex
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of =aaure �am
d: Arent locations using nonmetallic collec:.ors.
U. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure mom under the su=f=e crust
avoiding bedding carer-als and using ntrmetsllic collec=rs.
2. Liq=$.a wee M==7
i. Unde;-slotted-floor pit
a._ E..ead a 1/2' nonmetaLic conduit open on both ends into
maat:re to pit floor.
b. Seal tamer and of conduit (e.g., by placi: g a hum3b over end
of conduit) upping =amara that has entered lover end, remove
and empsp sl=--y it r-o plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples Mom 5 or more locations or ar. least I quart.
d_ His and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii_ Exterior storage basin or tactic
a. Hake sure mancse has been well miamed frith a liquid +h2==&
chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take snbs=ples '--= about 5 pit locations, from agi zor p=p
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and =xrension Specialist, Biological and Ag_icultural Engineering
Depar=ezur, Nor=h Carolina Sraze Universit-7, :.sleigh, NC.

- _.-.....-- -rtae men
Page 3 of 3
II. SA121M PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate. freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab. Inc. iii. P017foam Packers Corp.
7621 Ahitepine Road 2320 S. Foster avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 'heeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
U. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
3335 ninon Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkisson, AT 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents_
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Qasze/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Badge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 276"
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Bay Campbell
U. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii.. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, m=ber flocks grown on litter; etc.)
a. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, R, Ca, Mg, Na,
S , Fe, 21n , ?.a, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DX. Mo, Cd, Ni. Pb

I�� wv (J�� (�l�i�•M.�
CERTIFICATION CHECK LIST FOR
EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
1.
Waste Utilization Plan 11 oZ,ry(o"- 9 7
VI { e .
Operator has acceptable waste
utilization plan
Planned irrigation system is compatible with type of waste storage facilit} sols,
crops and pumping schedule shown in the waste utilization plan-.
,...w
2.
Field Specifications (Use USDA-NRCS Table 1 or Similar Table)
Legible,FSA photo copies and county tax maps of effluent disposal fields
v
Maximum useable acreage of each field shown excluding buffer or restricted
irrigation areas. The designer will decide usable irrigation area of each field.
Soil types of each field
Average
slope of each field
'Crops to receive animal waste are shown for each field
`Recommended maximum average precipitation rate in each field (where there is
more than one soil/crop combination that results in a different recommended
precipitation rate, show the recommended maximum average precipitation rate for
each combination)
Recommended maximum application amount per irrigation cycle in each field
(where there is more than one soil/crop combination that results in a different
recommended application amount, indicate the recommended maximum
application amount for each combination)
3.
Working Map or Sketch
Ditches, perennial streams, wetland areas, and other bodies of water are identified
/along with the size of each.
✓/
Surrounding water wells are located
Surrounding dwellings, schools, hospitals and other important structure locations
are shown
10/14/97
M

CERTIFICATION CHECK LIST FOR
EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
0!!!Highway right-of-way locations are indicated
Location of farm roads, fences and other obstructions are shown to scale on map
Critical property boundaries are shown (15--a��
Critical el ati ns that are used in total d namic heacl computations are shown
cation of irrigation mains and laterals s milderLo:rgun hydrants thrust blocks,
etc. are shown with the design spacing of hydrants pope Ines recorded on the
map or sketch. This will be accomplished by the irrigation systems designer.
(If Possible)
4. Irrigation Design Parameters (Use USDA-NRCS irrigation Design Parameter
Worksheets or Similar Worksheets)
A. Traveling Gun Parameters (USDA-NRCS Table 2 or Other)
Type of speed compensation (USDA-NRCS Table 4 or Other)
Design travel speed for each pull
Design precipitation. rate for each pull
Design application amount shown for each travel speed
Effective width (lane spacing) and effective length for each pull
Operating pressure at the reel and the gun for each pull
Nozzle diameter in inches, indicate type of nozzle (taper bore or ring)
Wetted diameter at specified operating pressure
Arc pattern for each pull
Hose length and inside diameter
Make, model and type of traveler and gun with manufacturer specifications
included
J `
2 10/14/97

CERTIFICATION CHECK LIST FOR
EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
NI Computations of acres receiving uniform coverage
Specifications on hydrant. type and construction (n"-�
B. Solid Set/Permanent Sprinkler or Gun Parameters (USDA-NRCS Table 3) or other)
Design hydrant or g sprinkler spacing and pipeline eline spacing
g Y P P P P b
Operating pressure at sprinklers or guns
Nozzle diameter in inches, indicate type of nozzle for gun sprinkler
taper bore or ring)
Wetted diameter of sprinkler or gun
Are pattern and location of partial circle sprinklers or guns
✓ Design precipitation rate for full and partial circle sprinklers or guns
Design operating time for full and partial circle sprinklers or guns
V Computations of acreage receiving uniform coverage
—Lzmake, model and type of sprinkler or gun is shown with manufacturer
specifications
C. Parameters of Other Irrigation System Type:
Design operating pressure at the sprinklershun
Design precipi ati /rate
Travel speed r yDesign appl cation ach travel speed
Computations of acreage receiving uniform coverage
Make, model and type of equipment along with manufacturer's literature
J 3 10/ 14/97

CERTIFICATION CHECK LIST FOR
EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Gene A
Irrigation specifications should include a pumping schedule for each Meld giving
the number of pumping hours required to meet the crop PAN requirements. This
schedule should indicate the gallons or acre -inches to be applied per acre, the
S amount of each application and the total number of applications. The schedule
/ should also give some idea of the timing of the applications.
3 ' The Plan should discuss application record keeping, need for sample analysis,
need for soil sampling and length of time to maintain records
The Plan should mention the need for an Emergency Action Plan (EAP).
/ The Plan is the responsibility of the grower.
lie Plan should include information on annual system evaluation
The Plan should discuss soil type(s), soil(s) maximum infiltration rate, total PAN
generation to include sludge, loading rate(s) based on Realistic Yield Expectations
(RYE), and maximum loading rates both during summer months and %getter
winter months
✓� 4 % 10/14!97

EXHBrr D-I
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Latndowncr/OperatorHamel ,.._ M.{ _ 'r► �►,: County: O erSOn
Address:',/
er-ic Date:
Telephone: 39 2 2 Zi, 33
'ABLE 1 -'Field Specifications
Approximate
Maximum
Maximum
Maxlmwn
Apptleellon
Useable She
Application
per Irrigation
Field'
Nufnber
orFleld2
(&Cris)
SollTyoe
Slope,:,.
(%)
,a
Cron(s)
Raid
Un/hr)
Cycle3
(Inches)
Conuner,ts
v
Sec attached map.
Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section H G.- Arumal application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
NRCS, NC
JUNE,

V ,
EXHIBIT' D-2
TABLE Z - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: �r f io a7,4 10 Z;2,3(P-3
EQUIPMENT•
.,'Opemting
- Ct s
See attached map.
Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'Use the'rollowing abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (fuIl circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degrees of arc.
dr
—0 L.CL-
NRCS, NC
JUNE, i "

EXHiBR' D-3
( 64-4 :0 rA') " ,- A Kl efJ
TABLE 3 - soli Irrigation.Gan Settings
Model find Type of Equiprnent
Field Not
and
-'miber of
•
Hyd -rant Spacing (A)
:
OPERATINGMake,
Nozzle, Operating Operating
•:Time
IScc attached map.
2Sliow separate entries for cacti pipeline with hydrants in each field.
MRCS, NC
JU, 1996

/ram"
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications t 1/ ti/r
Traveling .
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gptn)
peraling Pressure at Pump (psi)
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
Hose Length (feet)
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
XXXXXXXX i
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Pump Power Requirement,(hp)
ABLE S -Thrust Block Speciticalionst
Designer rovide thrust block details on sc crate sheet.
THRUST BL(
LOCATIO q.
90o Bend
Dend End
'See USDA-NRCS Field Mice Technical Guide, Section 1V. Practice
EXHIBrr D4
4�
MRCS, NC
l� 1996

Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
)cscribe Ilia operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar shect most convenient to Ilse designer/supplier.
nelude procedures such as start-up, shut-dow, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
L'X1-DBfr D-6
MRCS. '-' C
JUKE, ;

1=3414mg)-ye
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: -Joe
Company: --S
Address: S, /rt d r " 54 . / t3 ox by ro C a 7's" 7?
Phone: 33 iv��.�� //fit
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
lie following details of design and materials'must accompany ulufflgation designs;
-A scale drawing of.thc propofed irrigation system`wtirclt iheitrdes liydrani_ locn4ons travel lanes, pipeline routes, flutist block locations and buffer areas whore applicable.
A"ssu:nxion`sand copulonafgr�Iiinitng fatal c gjt#rc hcbdarld horsepowcrrcquircments r,
'Cofnput6tions,tt'se'd to dclermmaalLmartilrne and Iutcr1pipe sizes: :.
Sourcesan. or 61culaErons uscd:for determining application rates: `
Computations ..used to delenmine the sizeof thrust blocks ,e�ud ill ustratiaris"bf all tluvst block configurations required in lire system.
Manuracturer's specifications for the'iriigatiOn pump, -tray' W—and`spH11kler(3)--""-' .
ivranufacturces specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Tcclwical Guide, Section iV; Prgctice Code 4 07DD.. ,... .
'rhe information required by this form are the minimuinft quirements. It is the responsibility of (lie designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as
appropriate. - 6 k
Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pondembankmcnts without the approval of the designer.
!OTE: A buffer strip A feet wide or wider must be maintained between (Ile limits of the irrigation system Rod all perennial
streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.
MRCS, N(,
JUKE, "

FORM IRR-1
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
EXHx-xT E-1
Farm Owner Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Date
Ili •• •• ,- -1 • 11 1 • ••- •

BIG GUN®
PERFORMANCE
TABLES
U.S.
UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS
- 24"
TRAJECTORY"
100 T TAPER $OR£ NOZZLES
N=a
Narzte
Nozz,a
f4wre Na121e
Nozxla
NO2z4 NQ4w NOUN Nax,11e
Pgl. GPM 01A.
GPM OM1,
A'
GPM 04A.
95' 7'
GPM Duk GPM DIA.
"
GPM DIA,
A^ As'
GPM OIA. GPM
9'
DIA. GPM
t.0.
DIA. OPM Oul
SO 60 295'
44 216'
74 225'
67 23e t00 2416'
115 236'
T30 2"' 150
273' 1"
260' 244 am
70 6D 225'
>6 236'
N 23D'
103 263' 17.0 275'
134 2e3'
1 155 M' 177
302' 1 107
310' 243 336'
3p 66 245•
e3 2W
j 100 276
12 203' +36 296'
155 3W
T15 at5' 207
326' 223
335' 274 362•
t1p 76 M'
92 Z7e'
111 290'
129 303" 150 MS.'
171 324'
195 335' 222
344' 2a7
]55' 30a 360��
• 'Ar2r1,Cb Only wiM F100 i 3A100.
�? 109A RING NOZZLES ,: , i ' '•
100 ON DIFFUSEA NOZ_ZLS_S
" ."PSI. .7i 1411V0 .77 RING
AING
,d6 RING 1� RING
.93 RINO
.44 RING 0.5 ON
0,6 DN
0.7 ON D.e DN
GPM DIA GPM DIA
GPM OtA
GPM DIA -O
GPM DIA
GPM OFA GPM DIA
GPM DfA
GPM OtA OPM DIA
40 60 201 7e 212
91 216
103 224 TIB 236
13A 23e
152 212 a6 IBA
66 160
91 162 1+0 196
60 it 236 86 40
110 245
125 260 41 270
lea 27
__94 260
1119 2pp 113 21e
e0 w Ms t1+ M127
275
1a6 z65 103
tog 305
211 315
100 toy 270 124 260
IA2 795
102 306 162 y20
2t2 326 1
M335 - -
- -
- -- -
••Tate dym9r9r M &Kr M aD"niMataty 3% IMM br 466 21' N'g1ap10r7 Angy, iy Ia64 000 le'
150 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 24- TRAJECTORY"
150 T TAKA BOAS NOZZLES
Noah 1110z Naxz+e
Hoizte
Noazk
Nas,tlo
Nou1a
P$I_ GPM OIA. GPM DIA. GPM D1A.
GPM DIAw
GPM DIA,
GPM
Of..
GPM
O[A
BQ 1t0 M, +43 265' 162 305'
225 325'
275 3416'
330
366'
wo
366
psi
300'
eD 120 2901 105 30' 21D 335'
2W 3W'
315 37S'
360
395, 1
imp
a4b
a10'
100 TcT 310. 165 330, 235 399,
�J
290 375'
355 400'
4Z5
an' i
S00
aa0'
120 157 ax -1704 360' 256 37S'
320 395'
705 a28'
aai
440-
Say
460'
R RINGNOZZLES gave .
r150
I i a;•q Ong In8
R�n9
Rlr�
414
R11
I
FB' A7• 1.Od
"s1. GPM DIA, GAM DIA. GPM ntA,
t.ti"
GPM DIA
1.29
GPM DIA.
t;l<' i
GPM DIA,
111
GPM
DIA,
1 60 110 200' 143 2e0- 102 300' f
226 315,
275 335'
330
350,
395
366'
60 12B 260' r-•165 . -300' 210 320'
260 3A0
315 360'
360
300'
A45
396'
tOp t. 11" 300' 105 11120111 236 340'
Z90 WO'
5=356 360'
a25
aD0'
Wo
A16'
t2D 157 31S' 204 316' 256 39o'
J20 360
36G A00.
465
An.
545
A36-
••T/k a+amarsr 04 1nr(1- y appmx4*1NY 3% 4aas for the 21& trapnwy angle
200 SERIES BIG GUNS - 270 TRAJECTORY"
200 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
NaTlk
Nozrte Na2x10 Narzla Nau1a
Naxrw No2:4
N.uw
/iatzi,o
PSI. GPM DIA,
1.2' +.7`
GPM DtA. prM plA. GYM DIA
i.a•
opDII,
t.s Ie`
GPM DIA GPM
DIA
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA
70 t 270 360'
310 360• 355 396' at5 n0'
A90 430•
555 450' 830
4135
756 495
ego
61y'
9r1 3+0 )901
360 a10' a06 423 1 475 "5'
545 466'
e25 466' 715
506'
e55 535'
1006
535'
t50 3a0 4t0
390 430' aA6 450• 525 A70'
d05 aoh-
4395 5t6' 790
536,
543 505'
t+10
690'
ry7 1 37C � 5'
�
425 a.5 405 +tLS' _i 51 i aB6'
655 515
755 SW' 660
SW'
1075 690'
+2t0
d20' J
200 R RIN(` S ` Or
mw.�
1 �" Rtr1q
t /Ung 1 4 ng
I -%-- Ring
I %, Rlnp
1 .,,. q
al" .nitOff)
2. Rho
t1e31 .0,411 II
I1,1e tee aI) +5e a Iuat S,.ee- ae,0a17
OU. D11 GPM DIA.
I (I.74' .auto
GPM DIA.
(I
GAM
DIA.
GAM
PSI GPM DIII
GPM GPu
-
60 250 3a0
330 3T0• 366 390'
WA
AA6 a,0'
614 425,
666
440' 1
696
V7'
60 290 370 360 a00' 4a5 420'
S15 dap
500 a64'
675
&To,
605
Ai3D'
,f,p 326 390' 42s 425' 500 145'
315 465'
600 400'
755
SOD'
000
$29'
' 120 355 410' 4e5 845' 545 a86•
6:r0 Ad6"
725 600"
025
520-
965
545'
. 7nv :7 amolel o1 In.o.. ,e apprGnms:ery 2% lop ror d"e 24' IFLOCI" "916 514 MM la• 4"
21' 4.40C,0� 1, 9"
Tne alG GUNr zn,Wmhnce ame hu roam o0ta,'a urrdor �6sal "..r enhrtltlonr, anC may ee A01-04r ar4Ct60 by Imo, poor hvdiu,.tic nmren
a c,f• r,;N_.L O'.mar
+atlem
7
Nat— 11ngat,Gr1 COrpo Mian --k1 as n9ra*4rrrm'e- mg4rd�-q e.r> m 00-,Jfl r. w APPlIC6110- •an

163 y.�.e,.
3701
)CIO P.S.r
CIL/ �90o6
4M666 0;�,7
, r/,
do. r
l3. S
7107;

wet,&
l
aoo'=yo
.z = loo'x .So(.2oq�
�r. �/,
foic)
p6.3 x 2W .,.
rv-x0a,

x,�",.
ISoRy�is�i /s>6
a"
114

m
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along. ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1118 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5590
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 18.6333333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 44.72 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 8

37 M Fie 73 — 7-7
� f � pp��•' "'.her ��^�_� S �;, ...y � '„ M k:; - � p• � �1 r
NtV
.01•,jV�. ♦+'[� `4r� �� �•1 1 ,;,. .Ny'i •r,,�,
«je �_ 3.. L.ea,.y- r k Ic [,\\ r.,,y. °�..i r r .<,v �•�►, fl . 2 /s '�+� �. ♦. R .
v~�i � , !fi /S',��Ts �. �. .�, es d' Y-''iri�w c -,'• .� .1r, X �, _ ., �� '�,�.�" ` ..�' ��`7f>� J � ;��.
[ �TeM { k• V Y � J+J ]- �� 4. f F b', �'V��rS �, � -'�- _ts-r' � f
•' '.*'V'e'�: 1 r• "Y' '".. -q A v- pm ''- may:-. x 's'+ . l���
.'rc+` � "� • ''� � �. of R � • 8 •'� �, wa' �Y .6f- � �� � `�'i'• � !r .r T �� '.VON
�� �' _ c � .�i. �►O � a r. % '.:� '�"�t c , '�h r • � ' :' � � may£
TA
iP S ♦ '3. .rye 'i �j�,�at.� ' ♦S? A+
,..� a} �rT�Fc' �Y•- a Y�-$.., j M ' Ja 1 f _ C x:Yp .. t �y� r � - �'! /%
1 r CRT, o n}
3 .41 O �+am FLs ri., S • $urce�sit�1s�
rid. 2 - /SG 4.
P/da. /, 2
I ♦ . �! ..I i
jY
A-R9'

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
C CORN
FHH FESCUE - HAY
W WHEAT
CROP
FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
UNITS IPER UNIT
BU 1.25
TONS 50
BU 2.4
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 24.3 8978.85 I+
35.
Page: 6

r"
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN 7 3-10
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
3,3. & 3.3.7
3. 2, 9
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
�E4
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
PER
ACRES
AW N
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
AP L
METH
N
M
111
2
ApB
C
110
137.5
1.4
192.5
I
MAR, JUN
111
13
jApB
IC
1110
1137.5
I ]-0.9
1MA123R.75
JUN
Ill
4
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
11.1
11.51.25
MAR, JUN
1l1
5
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
1 11.4
1192.5
MAR, JUN
111
6
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
1 13.2
1440
MAR, JUN
111
7
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
1 13.5
1481.25
MAR, JUN
111
8
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
1 14.1
1563.75
MAR, JUN
111
9
ApB
1.6
IC
I
1110
1137.5
1
1220
MAR, JUN
3210
1
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
1 14.9
1673.75
MAR, JUN
111
2
ApB
IC
I
1110
1137.5
1 11.6
1220
MAR, JUN
3210
3
ApB
IC
1110
1137.5
1 10.6
182.5
I
MAR, JUN
111
1-2
ApB
JW
155
1132
1 11.4
1184.8
I
NOV,MAR
111
ApB
FHH
�-2
I
12.0
1100
1 11.4
1140
AUG-OCT
1
ApB
1-3
JW
I
155
1112
1
10.9
1118.8
NOV,MAR
Page: 3

l
f
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
lb.�
Ro,0;cl�
L�
l�cc
U
y
+
111
-3
ApB
FHH
0.9
I
12.0
1100
I
I
190
AUG-OCT
111
ApB
1-4
JW
I
155
1132 1
11.1
1145.2
NOV,MAR
ill
ApB
FHH
1-4
I
12.0
1100 1
11.1
1110
AUG-OCT
111
ApB
1-5
1
JW
I
1-1-5
11-32 1
11-4
1184.8
NOV,MAR
111
ApB
FHH
1-5
I
12.0
1100 1
11.4
11-4-0
AUG-OCT
111
ApB
1-15
JW
I
155
1132 1
13.2
1422.4
NOV, MAR
111
ApB
FHH
2.0
1-6
I
I
1100 1
13.2
1320
AUG-OCT
111
ApB
1-7
JW
I
155
1132 1
13.5
1462
NOV,MAR
ill
ApB
FHH
1-7
I
12.0
1100
13.5
1350
AUG--OCT
111
ApB
1-8
JW
I
155
1132 1
14.1
1541.2
NOV,MAR
111
ApB
FHH
1-8
I
12.o
Iloo 1
14.1
1410
AUG-OCT
111
ApB
1-9
JW
I
155
1132 1
11.6
1211.2
NOV,MAR
111
ApB
FHH
1-9
I
12.o
Iloo 1
11.6
1160
AUG-OCT
3210
ApB
1646.8
1-1
JW
I
155
1132 1
14.9
NOV,MAR
3210
ApB
FHH
14.9
14§0
1-1
I
12.0
1100 1
AUG-OCT
3210
ApB
1-2
JW
I
155
1132 1
11.6
1211.2
NOV,MAR
'10 1-2
ApB
FHH
12.0
1100 1
11.6
1160
I
AUG-OCT
Page: 4

J
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3210 1-3 I ApB I W 155 1132
•3210 1-3 1 ApB FHH 12.0 1100
I
END
I
0.6 179.2
NOV, MAR
0.6 160
AUG-OCT
TOTAL18978.85
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North'Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS ivlq-
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state dy
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or 19,�6
direct discharge during operation or land application.". ,Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohib`ted..
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to:a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
.Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence.
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

J
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plane which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

PLAT OF SURVEY
J. u■M.la st*w-ft
IFHM" A., ANCI e ( kUMV 4. WWK �
I w.7mr,Tea I
emir a. amm
w.2w,
JIMMY THOMAS
w.Lu, P.7M �
; '
r..tu
,
TIMMY THOMAS
" "'
'' ' ' '
__—
__
f7s.7■• A■Aj
ALLENSVILLE THP.• PERSON COUNTY,
N.C.
NOVEMBER 1994• HAMLETT-JENNINGS A ASSOCIATES
JOHN J. JENNINGS L-3052
I i
4
jh* w p IM • Wit.
\s
I
_
Co.tra• r.■oa
�~4�
r
,. II?KL7 ■a.osa
�
�9
v
_ _
W
so rK
` I,
=�
_
-
c
,>„
T
O..18,eO. ►.1
a8... AQU
VICINITY MAP
:.
7.
I7
NXrt
IF
rs
I J. pPMLP �Ow[R
A �
-
ttW.07.4M•f llr I"I.,1•
107.19 ACRES "
`
��.�.'�;•.
I
S
I
(
a
„
I rlul.ttt ■. j .
•
1
to
- - J
t IFI
■. vru 1100W, A. I y
--
w.t■1. r.s■s
���\
m•ff•it•f
I � >R �
E
�!
r
IF
I
,
1+.if Law
�. t1'17•e
'
'
DO. tfa, F. UI L[Ol74
Nr • NAIL FOUND
NS O NAIL SET
f !
_
IF • FOUND
111"W
1S o IRON SET
f
Ci
■, sk"IY soww..f.
1P a YAMEYATICAL
d
I
Of.122. P.fN
POINT
Il
7e
u<m 71010). 2EALO wO DMD, TNIf IS .
MUINIw Rai, Wl 7A WXDPMTIQM. MM
M 0
It •
l7el .70'
=r
Ile ea VE7r&m f.
�.•
Ill. • 7■
a
tw■•7O'■7Y �1
)Aa'17•
•. av 12 3. P.6 M.0.
Y!(L �r—
CRQ-K
Q 1 rl:.i...0
R�ivan iA1c wlnfrna
WAGWf1C
217 S.LAIIAR ST. - P.O.802 12f1
FAX9OR0 WCOM IYROUWI 27577
(e1O1 BOO-�7a=

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SWCD 910-592- ,?
MRCS jIO - -
Nc.CeS 9�v99-1/qs
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are Ieaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include.
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and elinnate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge_
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, -solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
December 18, 1996

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in'a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does.the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of.the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name: MiacAin -r L o
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
2 1December 18, 1996

Narrative On The Allensville Unit (Thomas Farms - Timmy & Jimmy)
This narrative is attached to the attachment written on
April 11, 1997. The majority of the BMP's (Best Management
Practices) suggested that day have been installed from the last
visit on 11-26-97 at 10:45 a.m. On November 26, 1997, Joey
Knight (Person County Agriculture Extension Agent and waste
Management Technical Specialist) made a site visitation to the
Allensville Unit of the Jimmy & Timmy Thomas Swine Farm. While
at the farm, the Insect Control, Odor Control, Mortality
Management, and Emergency Action Plan sections of the Waste
Management Plan were addressed again. All checklists are
completed if appicable. All BMP's (Best Management Practices)
are being followed presently. All checklists and other
attachments are attached to this narrative.
Jimmy & Timmy Thomas have
facility with NRCS assistant.
will evently be closed out with
improvements have been made on
have purchased the farm. They
and NCCES agencies for several
Signature:
Address:
Phone# : 91/2 J5V' - //9- _
retrofitted their lagoon at this
One other lagoon on this facility
NRCS assistant. A lot of
this farm since both Jimmy & Timmy
have worked closely with both NRCS
years.
-<-%

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
Mr" Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches'over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation 2' Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along watees edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders Feed Spillage 63"'Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
ff**�Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues Reduce moisture accumulation within and AMA _/�
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site vaZ °,; 094A-1,F,�.
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewers grain and similar high
noisture grain products).
Q' Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
AMIC -November 11, 1996, Page 1

r
Source Cause BMWs to Control Insects" Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes O Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is�
minimal. ,
O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around 464g /3n�l.ttelt- .
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems_ _ day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
0 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMID vember 11, 1996, Page 2
r

4V
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMRs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Swine production Vegetative or wooded buffers;
li,Reconuitended best management practices; B rn f I a,' �'"' � •
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces • Dirty manure -covered animals Dry floors
Floor surfaces Wet manure -covered floors 61' Slotted floors;
fsY Waterers located over slotted floors;
3"'Feeders at high end of solid floors;
91"�Scrape manure buildup from floors; �•
13" Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits • Urine; Frequent manure removal b flus it recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposition 0 scrape;
Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; Fan maintenance;
Dust 0""Eflicient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust t' Washdown between groups of animals; allot! Peed
/� �/ additives; Q QJ' `
Feeder covers;
Deed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon 0 Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling p Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
alleys Agitation during wastewater 2- Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon 0 Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling with anti -siphon vents j
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank E7Sump tank covers �,s[.rn�y / /C4tItl,
filling and drawdown 1Gr�m�
Outside drain collection Agitation during wastewater
orjunction boxes conveyance
AM lovember 11, 1996, Page 3
Sox covers
��p� Cdt�v1- B•�v

Source Cause 'BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lift stations Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater ®" Extend discharge point of pipes underneath %u�_ .t._P¢o.1_1
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level �yn4za, fie, et,..e.,
Lagoon surfaces 0 Volatile gas emission; Sk-Properlagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; Ii�Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation Q"�Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Minimum agitation when pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler •
nozzles
High pressure agitation;
1_H'Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
.
Wind drift
rr'Minimum recommended operating procedure;
ff//Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
� NIQCS
O Pump from second -stage lagoon;P.A...
}
C/99 J.
0 Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals •
Carcass decomposition
Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water around •
Improper drainage;
Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities .
Microbial decomposition of
away from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public •
Poorly maintained access roads
Farm access road maintenance
,
roads from farm access
Additional Information : Available From :
Cattle Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95 NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

Source Cause BMWs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at 0 Agitation during wastewater 119 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; C9�Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
. Q,"Minimum agitation when.pumping;
O Mechanical aeration;
0 Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; G]" Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; Q
nozzles 3�/o
Wind drift C>'Minimum recommended operating pressure; Gam*
l"Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
O Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ . Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; 0 Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying 0 Basin surface mats of solids;
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface •
Partial microbial decomposition;
Extend drai ipe outlets underneath liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level,
•
Agitation when emptying
CY Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge •
Agitation when spreading;
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets a
Volatile gas emissions
93"'
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, •
Volatile gas emissions while
0
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
0
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
surfaces
Q"'Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals •
Carcass decomposition
Proper disposition of carcasses'`'`
_
' Dead animal disposal •
Carcass decomposition
0
Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits
fO
Proper location/construction of disposal pits
' Incinerators •
Incomplete combustion
❑
Secondary stack burners � � gD
_ AN 4ovember 11, 1-496,
Page 4

Source
BMPs to
Standing water around 0 Improper drainage; Er Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
ecific Practices
Additional Information :
Available From:
_ Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE - -
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-98
NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within .24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
❑ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Cd� Ge t 'incineration ( Up +0 80 HOS,)
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
Per5 on Co--Ai7 kA*1d-P1 11
v,pFea' P�e�mDNt e�ufrc>J�e���I ,ScrYice-
3 a� 36-Y - 3& 99
December 18, 1996

Ooereror`TH0MA5 (WF4VFR FARCouet�y: PERS C;N Date,
07/3l/8�
Ji�renue ro neuree� r�ei�ence (o�her �hmn
o�ner), �
� fee�
�. AVFRA (GE LIVF WEI5H.T (ALW)
�60 �o*s (farpu� to finieh)
'
X I417 lbe. =
�6 8420
l�e
0 �owe (farrow ro
0 head [[iniehinonlv)
x '3 be. =
0
lbs
^ O emWe (farpmw co weHo}
x 43 be.
0 head (weHo co
x be. =
O
lb�
-____________________________________.
�
____________________________________
Tm�a7
Aver�ge Live Weigh(-
842
10o
2. MINIMUM RFQUlRED TRFATMENT V0LUPflE
OF LAGOON
V��ume = �68420 loe Al x
Tpe��men� Volume(�F}/lh.
ALW
Tr�a�wen� �olume(�F)/lb. ALV;
= ) CF/lb.
4LW
�olume = 368420 cubio feet
�. GT�RA�E V�LUME F�R 5LU��� AC0UMUL�Tl�N
Volume = 0.V cubic �eet
44wIP OW*VmA
A10
4. T0T4L DE,75I8NED VOLUME
Ineide �o� lh (f- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ine�de top w-idth (feet)'---------------------- 0
Tap of dike elevat: Imn {feet)----------------- 9� �
Bottmm of la@oun el�v*t Jmn (fee�)------------ O
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 0
Side slopes. (inside logoon)------------------ g.7
Tural de-elQn voluwe ua10(j prJewoidal
5S/E ND1 -53/EWD2 SS/SIDE1 55/5IDE2 LEN8TH WIPTf) F PTF
2.5 2.5 �.5 2.5 5A0-0 13S.0 1D 0
AREA OF TOP
LFNrTH � HIDTH =
5 90�
AREA OP ROTT0M
LFNGTH * WIDTH =
�u0O 88.(1
4�EA �� MT�5ECT�N
LENGTH * �IDTH `� 4
81420 A. rR F A 0F T0P}
4752CI {AREA OF 8CjTT0t%il}
(4RF4 �� MI05�CTI�N * �}
|A�EA TOP + (4*A��� �I�5��T}�N} + �RF4 ��TT;�� * ���TH��
8�4�O.0 ���38�.0 47�200 l 7
T�ral �ee/�ned V*lume 4"a�lahle = ������ �U FT

-ORAk-,F REClUIRFn TFMPiRARY 5!
1) R A I IN A G I' E A 'R' E A -,
aoocm (top o� el-ike.'
g t
Btrildings (1.'oof and lot water)
V trYIS u'i c e�
TO T A L r) A 88800.0 q r E. r. � e t...
Des'ign stov.;.Ige t(-.) 1 .8 0 d S
5A, Vo1unje of w,�ste Idt"OdUcIle.0
F e s & tj I t, (-) ci �_j c o I-) I n 9 a. /,Ja y p e r 15 5 1 b A L W 37
Jri #t.ttloe3'08IL20 I Ls A! W/ 135 1 b A L. 44 37 1 /d 180 day�'
vc)]uIlle G 7 2'9 R I (.,);I I S . c) r 8 9 y 7 0 7 (..., u b I e e t
5 F Vo"utlle of water
w -1,L,, ()'f t.er used For. ash'ing f1oors 00 VC) I U h"I
Wa
'.'esh water, u-.'ed' for t r`lush F"lush rec-ir'c'u". i.:e
he I i �'( i .IjC)CP') HCCOLA')t-.-od 'ot, in 5A.
VOILA010 2470 9 1 o ris/ da y -'J: 180 (Jays sC"or,age./"f 48 (jHl lon',s
pei, GF
u I;, e -a x c' e Vo ' o f 1 n n k: , S s of e va
S e c) {:}f tI I I e w h en t la n e:>,. c; e. e e.!k: e V'9 u e S C) i I C
a Y e x c e. s S I
.1 t-I D
vc)'Iun#e = 51R00.0

^
�
-
Volume of 25 year - 24 hour scoro/
Volume = Vl inches / 12 inches per Foot * 0A
Volume = 45140.0 cubic fee�
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY 3TORAGE
5A.
89971
cubic
fee:
56.
SA439
cubic
feet
5C
51800
cubic
Feet:
30.
46140
cubic
feet
TOTAL
246349
cubic
Feet
6, SUMMARY
Temporary storage per!od====================>
lRO
days
Rainfall in excess of evaporarion===========>
74
inches
25 year - 24 hour
6.1
inches
2,0
feet
Side slopes =====-
3.5
: l
inside top
600.0
feer
Inside too
148.0
feer
Top of dike
93.0
feet
Bottom of lagoon
81.0
feet
Total required volume=======================>
614769
cv,
fr
Actual design
640533
cu
ft
Seasonal high warertab7e elevation (SHWT)===>
0.0
feet -
Stop pumping ======/
87.5
feet
Must be > or = to the 5HWT elev.==========/
0.0
Pew
Must be > on = to min, req, treatment el.-/
87.0
fee�
Required minimum rpeatwenc volume===========>
358420
ou,
fr.
Volume at stop pumping e7evatiun===========W
377501
ou
Q.
Start pumping
90.5
fee(
Muar be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume lees 25 yr- 24 hr. rainfall--`
595399
mu
Q.
Volume at start pumping elevation===========>
B00277
cu.
Ft.
Required volume co be pumped================>
20120;
ou
ft
Actual volume planned to be pumpeJ==========>
222776
cu,
fr.
Min, rh1okneee of soil liner when /`oquired==/
1.8
feek�
T, 0E5IG NED RY,a-1w_~-k_ A P P R 0 V F D BY, (J-' I
NOTE, SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMEmT5.________________--______---------------------------
K
I

z
os�h
$S7+Q cE (am) �- v
O o /-7
Y

LAGOON SUMMARY SHEET & TYPICAL CROSS --SECTION
Settled top of dam: 3.0
"Cop Width
rQ� ;
�a Construct toga of d4;m
Fill Yardage:
Z.1 5 Jr
//1Slr
Natural cjr0Und elev.
cut aff meal
---*—'O*� Depth determi nd by
Depends on c:��.�iE�n�eitt ��—� --�1. ; yCS on site
Start land n)plication Stop land application
e�lev. 6.5 ��� _ — — r elev. 87..5—
ltane
„_ __ T _—_�1'emporary V --- -- ----- ---- ------ -/
Dent
support% Traatment Volume
Top of sludge elev. S
---------------------------------- ;�v
Sludge ZACCLIbUlGi'L'iOn
Bottom elev. +0
ra.wIA
Lagoon size: Length 'S Wi clth ex Cu. Yds. c:xcavatecj
C4
E ENCH NMI'.' DCSCRIE'1'I0I'4: - - -
# 2 a.� E,z s e-r. el,
Elevation: ✓040•Oo
GENERAL INFORMATION
J[7E+ CLASS: _ i+agyI r' c I8 11�
HAZARD CLASS:L a,
ANIMAL TYPE & NUMBER: 2�m
KIND OF OPERATION: &,tiyw —
140TE: If constructing ic; not
started within one year, this
plan is not valid until re-
,-V,X1 .Latit»1 of floc►d plain for
safety hAzard is, made.
LAGGOIV FOR ANIMAL WASTE
(SINGLE STAGE)
I- R H
COUNTY
STATE
U. S. DEPAi=;T VENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
DESIGNED BY: 4-A-
AP17'ROVE-D BY:
TITLE:
DATE:

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOCsNS OR HOLDING PONDS
Clearing: Al trees and brush shalI be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is -.started. Stumps w i I I be removed within
the area of the foundation of the embankment and al excavated areas. All
stumps and roots exceeding one (1) Inch in diameter shaI1 be removed to a
minimum depth of one (1) foot. Satisfactory disposition will tie made of
all debris. The foundation area shall tie loosened thoroughly and roughly
leveled, with suitable equipment, before placement of any embankment
material.
Cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall tie excavated as shown on the plans.
DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE APPRC iX I MATE . EXACT DIMENSIONS WILL L.E DETERMINED Liy
SCS-PERSONNEL WHEN THE SITE IS OPENED UP, DURING CONSTRUCTION. The cutoff
trench shaII be backfilled in thin layers, not to exceed eight (`•) inches
depth. Ail standing water shall be removed from the trench before
backfilling is started.
Construction: Construction will consist of excavation to the neat lines
and grades as planned. In areas of the lagoon bottom and side slopes where
pervious material is encountered, the area shall be overexcavated by 2.6'
feet and backfilled with ciayey material. Excavation shall be by pan,
drag1ine and/or backhoe. A bulIdozer or other- equipment wiII be used to
dress the slopes. FiII material placed in the embankment shall be free of
sod, roots, stones over n inches in diameter, and other objectionable
materials. The fill material shall tie placed and spread over the entire
fill area in layers not to exceed 8 inches in thickness. Construction of
the fill shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content
of the f i I.I material w i I I permit a reasonable degree of compaction.
_shal I be accornpl ished with a sheep —foot
Corn_acti�an-..of al I_ f i i I material .,_ ��..,
,roller passing sgygral
times over the entire surface of each S inch lift.
Tr-. rotect a ainst leakage the entire Iagoon bottom and a i I excavated side
sIo es shall tie compacted in the same manner- as the -fill material
compaction.
The primary borrow area will be within the basir, itself. Any other areas
will be designated on the plans.
Vegetat_ion: Al I exposed embankment, spi I Tway, and borrow areas shal I tie
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as Soon as possible after -
construction.
SPECIAL IINSTRUCTIONS
Cut Core Where Fill Exceeds 3'
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION

4 . •'
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with
min. odor control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached (permanent + temporary storage) may vary due to soil conditions
flushing operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed 6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume
based on: 1) waste from animals; 2) excess rainfall after evaporation;
and 3) the largest 24 hour (one day) rainfall that occurs on the
average of once every 25 years. The volume of waste generated from
a given number of animals will be fairly constant throughout the year
and from year to year. This estimate is based on 7 inches of excess
rainfall which is equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months excess in
a year. The average annual excess rainfall is approximately 8 inches.
Therefore, an average of 8 inches of excess rainfall will need to be
pumped each year. The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider
in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage volume must always be
available. A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed on the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed on this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment depth (6 feet).
Pumping can be'started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.

3. Begin DumD-out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 90-s as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation S-s or before the fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this.prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria). The design temporary storage, less 25 year storm
is 1.0/I 2,07 cubic feet or 1,5oso43gallons. As stated before, this
volume will vary considerably from year to year.
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around .
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

I
1. Please explain in the narrative of operations the two-year crop rotation.
Include what will be planted the first and second years (include application
periods for each crop). It is difficult to gather this information from Table 1 of
the WUP.
A narrative of operations for the two-year rotation is included in the revised WUP.
The newly revised WUP is attached.
(Landowner) (Date)
AICN;S -ate - 98
4kMphni al Speciali t) (s) (Date)

2. The WUP states that corn and wheat will be irrigated during the months of March
and June and November and March respectively. Why is waste only being
applied for these months? The recommended application months for corn ranges
from March - June and for wheat, October - March. Please explain this
Information in the narrative.
Corrections have been made on application months for waste being applied to
specific crops on given fields. Refer to revised WUP that is attached.
(Landowner) (Date)
N3-M
7et i Speciali ) (s) (Date)

3. The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) states that the Realistic Yield Expectations
(RYE) for corn is 110 bushels/acre and for wheat is 55 bushels/acre. Referring
to the RYE manual issued by the NCSU Cooperative Extension Service, the yields
for corn and wheat should be 105 bu/ac. and 50 bulac. respectively. Note that
actual yields that are higher than the RYE's listed by the NCSU Coop Extension
may be used for facilities that can document such yields with records that show
the average yield for three out of five years meets or exceeds the actual yield
used in the WUP. If this is not the case, please make the appropriate changes
to the WUP to reflect the correct RYE's.
Thomas Farms RYE averages for corn are 110 bushels/acre and wheat at 55
bushels/acre for the last three years. The reason their averages are higher than
the Person County average on these particular soils is that they utilize no -till
management and crop rotation in their production plan. They have taken bin
measurements each year for production data on the wheat and corn crops.
(Landowner)
d (D t
(echn' al Specialist) (s)
(Date)

4. Tract 111, Field 2 has corn listed twice with two different acreages. Please
explain and/or revise this information.
Corrections have been made in the newly revised WUP.
4no �4,e�
(Landowner) (Date)
�43-ig
NCas) f-� -98
"ech(s) (Date)

5. Include in the narrative, that an additional 10.8 acres has been cleared and
explain why.
This additional acreage was cleared in order to make waste applications more
efficient and easier for the traveling irrigation system. To be exact, all fields were
remeasured by the Extension Agent with the acreage wheel and a total of 39.349
acres can be used for waste applications. This allows an additional 8.149 acres
for waste application. Refer to the new map drawn instead of the old ASCS map
for new field acreages and boundaries. Look at the dimensions of the fields on
the irrigation layouts on each field. The new field maps are attached. Note the
new field boundaries because of the clearing of trees. This clearing has given
the farm this additional crop land to apply their swine waste.
-4/2
P
(Landowner) (Date) fTeffinicaf Specialist)(s) (Date)
Y-a3-i

6. The irrigation parameters listed in your WUP exceed current NRCS
recommendations. The application events listed in your WUP appear to be out
of the Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this guide
have not been adjusted for the application of animal waste. NRCS currently
recommends that total application amounts not exceed one inch in any application
event for any soil type. If your application rates need to be adjusted for the
application of animal waste, please have your Technical Specialist revise your
WUP to reflect the appropriate application amount per event. If the rates will
remain as written in the plan, please have your Technical Specialist justify the
increased application rate in the narrative of your WUP.
All changes have been made in the newly revised WUP. WUP is attached.
(Landowner) (Date)
-`v5- g8
Ncc'O.$) �'-ems -Aff
nifal Speci7t)(s)
(Date)
�'-.21.5A3

s
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
Jimmy & Timmy Thomas
8251 Oxford Rd.
Timberlake NC 27581
910-364-2633
RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
SEP 2 51998
Non -Discharge Permitting
Existing Farrow to Finish Swine
260.00 sows
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
260 sows x 19.9 tons waste/sows/year = 5174 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
260 sows x 26 lbs PAN/sows/year = 6760 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
ill
2
ApB
C
110
137.5
4.4
605
I
MAR-JUN
ill
14
IApB
I=
I110
1137.5
I 12.9
INlAR.7J5
ill
5
110
jApB
IC
I
1137.5
1 110.9
11498.75
MAR-JUN
ill
7
110
jApB
IC
I
1137.5
1 15.5
1756.25
MAR-JUN
ill
ApB
110
5.1
Ill
I
IC
x
1137.5
1
1701.25
MAR-JUN
3210
1
110
jAp13
IC
T
1137.5
16.3
1866.25
MAR-JUN
3210
2
110
jAp11
IC
x
1137.5
1 13.3
1453.75
MAR-JUN
3210
3
jAp11
110
110
IC
I
1137.5
1 1.8
IMAR-JUN
ill
1-2
jApB
JW
x
155
1132
1 14.4
1580.8
OCT-MAR
ill
FHH
1-2
jApB
I
12.0
jl00
1 14.4
1440
AUG-OCT
ill
1-4
jApB
JW
155
1132
1 12.9
1382.8
I
OCT-MAR
ill
FHH
2.0
1-4
jApB
I
I
1100
1 12.9
1290
AUG-OCT
ill
1-5
jAp]3
JW
I
155
1132
1 110.9
11438.8
OCT-MAR
ill
1-5
jApB
FHH
12.0
1100
1
110.9
11090
I
AUG-OCT
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Ill
1-7
IApB 1-17--__
1 55
1132
111
FHH
1-7
jApB
I
12.0
1106
ill
$
jApB
JW
I
155
1132
ill
FHH
1-8
jApB
I
12.0
�100
3210
1-1
jApB
JW
155
1132
I
3210
FHH
J-1-
jAp11
T
12.0
1100
3210
1-2
jApB
JW
I
155
1132
3210
FHH
1-2
jApB
I
12.0
1100
3210
1-3
jAp11
JW
I
155
1132
3210
FHH
1-3
�ApB
I
12.0
1100
END
T
5.5
1726
OCT-MAR
5.5
1550
AUG-OCT
5.1
1673.2
OCT-MAR
5.1
1510
AUG-OCT
6.3
1831.6
OCT-MAR
6.3
1630
AUG-OCT
3.3
1435.6
OCT-MAR
3.3
1330
AUG-OCT
0.8
105.6
OCT-MAR
0.8
180
AUG-OCT
TOTAL114484.4
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
C
CORN
BU
1.25
FHH
FESCUE - HAY
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BU
2.4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 39.2 14484.4
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2 0
TOTAL 39.2
*** BALANCE
C
14484.4
-7724.4 1
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1118 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 5590
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 18.6333333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 44.72 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25%� depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
ill
2
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
ill
4
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
ill
5
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
ill
7
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
111
8
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
111
�2
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.0
111
�2
ApB
W
.45
*1.0
111
�4
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.0
ill
ApB
W
.45
*1.0
ill
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.0
ill
ApB
W
.45
*1.0
111
y7
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.0
111
�7
ApB
W
.45
*1.0
111
�8
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.0
111
"8
ApB
W
.45
*1.0
3210
1
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
3210
2
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
3210
3
ApB
C
.45
*1.0
3210
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.0
3210
ApB
W
.45
*1.0
3210
ApB
FHH
.45
*1.0
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
3210
-2
3210
-3
3210
"3
* This is
ApB
ApB
ApB
the maximu
assuming the amoun
applied. In many
be applied because
application amount
conditions.
W
FHH
W
45
.45
45
*1.0
*1.0
*1.0
m application amount allowed for the soil
t of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
situations, the application amount shown cannot
of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
shown can be applied under optimum soil
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This operation consists of 1 retrofitted lagoon designed for a 260 sow farrow to
finish operation. There is one abandoned lagoon on site that is planned to be
closed out in 1998. Cost -share has been approved for the closure and a waste
utilization plan will be followed. Until the lagoon is closed, the operator must
maintain the water level from going above the 25 year/1 day storm pump stake.
The operator should also never allow the water level in the retrofitted lagoon
to go above the start pmp stake. Also, always stop waste application immediately
should runoff occur. During construction of retrofitted lagoon, a small
underground stream was hit when cutting the core. A 41, perforated plastic pipe
(with gravel & geotextile cloth) was laid starting at the core and extending
beyond the back toe of the dam. The outlet of this pipe should be protected from
clogging to prevent water from backing up into pipe. The fields receiving waste
are under a 2 year rotation of 1 year no -tilled corn followed by 2nd year of
wheat interseeded with fescue.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five ( 5 ) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Thomas Farms p6A �,✓e.
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Jimmy & Timmy Thomas
(Please print)
Signature: P61 15�4Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
o6��N°LI ) a - 15� 9
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Jim Huey
Affiliation:MRCS Phone No. 919-597-2973
Address (Agency): 304 S. Morgan St. Rm. 126
Roxboro NC 27573
Signature:
Date:
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE IITILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: 119_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
�J
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver. Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
, a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 16

7. Please include a map, pertaining to the irrigation system, illustrating the fields
each sprinkler will irrigate.
The drawn irrigation maps are attached with dimensions of each field and
irrigation layouts. Stationary and traveling gun irrigation systems are both utilized
on this operation. Each map illustrates the system being used on particular
fields.
(Landowner) (Date)
6VI
joz/��
(/vOC65) ^". �a
( ech ical Speciaiist)(s) (Date)

�
! `t ! , •�. b •� ••�.'
.W_"'r. !yR�,��,,�. t: �: ..••K� �t'S�'ii; arr �'�?4 �`'r' , ,f �� i•, hi,t,`•
NMI.'
t•j� •�r*�y�tiM� �i - �•" air_ �' f 'r'n'. y� - •.. • �l � � ' w'k,• '1-..
E : tiro j .' E q i �,� "� i 3' ; •iii+,�{6 , p . . k }' 1 P-,
f'wi� •y�''. l'., s';i� w'ZI�y, zSiM �{.�
s �v� �:1 +� �'1 Y�fr+• f�� r� s� � 1�y� ! `� r41 A ° � r r � •• 'I
14
..r<.•.•,.• ?GF r , ' ��'�j�t+r�' �:#:,.tip`+..,��'�4v � 1r,,.,ti,• �: �r
.71
i k1r."
,\ fry •S" ' .':S�`•.•i' .�..' o''ts'' •' •.�`,• s µ`�y y '+ 'I �� e Y,��a
r t 'r` �. ,1} �,•, '{. �,�y� siL+.v- j�F, .ri y. �' .1•�
k
p� ' p7
fkx
4z k"
ao
. c-- .q. .w t1 . �' l I - jl,� .� S'�` i -Y •`TSI `��! j� ' 4
i•',y�r �is _ �T,`s ti;,�.. -�..� i � t• � ,:"'�i4tTyd�,6•cr f'ts• a. } i' Ffyyy',fi,'s' � '` �'
•�_ {1`, �� k - � =.� ' •r~ � ,1 r�%:�r•1 Ce•ti,' 4�', � � ' � ' 1� 7vi*:' - -.. i ,�ieri �
�. �: a f' � +►r ,Ya ' y 't�;�t.,;� _ tN y`°�.; Ir
t.e ';��; '�, y¢ r-..r - 'ti .. •i` y ��I►
vv
'� rA• i - • : �... • : '^ j �*{' „J�f , ,'" : ' 1h �. � 7 •' �.x i . rll�_�• �k r J,
AV
Oil
r s
.i .�ty ��A,yn�ri�����AS••f���'�y"S%��' ':.1�h/r
Al
� �'wrf - Sr1�'.'� �.," TT ir�rs dr ..'ej.:7 A �.,r• +%• � •+

w'� u
, 73-1°
-TioaGA 11 l
S 1uI ir' 1oACc J
afa, a0 Q
azA
feed
J�elr
r p
Cti

K-fePs

a
ri &aTio.l
VIC
�� e
6Y3 ,
Lac; ; f
AO
nn r� 9' ..
Far/ oT
Fie Id # S�
K r" A,4w
isa, 1'.3g3'
�L�

r
n 1 , �.1 `M1/ /
PT

11
7�
row Tave /I CT-L"
we

3.3

Fac; 1;1"f �* 13 -/0
Tfr% t„ q- I '
Fie 1o(ft3
S rin k�Pr l� �u�T
-300
R� Tel;
i-a�c � e� a � � ,

150,
F r ; /; A, -# I3-1 o
/c F,
For