730003_PERMIT FILE_20171231

L
Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 73 3 Date of Visit: 4/25/2001 Time: 11:30 am
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Q Permitted © Certified [] Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: N�er>kkt.C.entxal. ixcska Jk.i>ux........................................ .................... County: Eersm ............................................... RRQ............
Owner Name: ................................................... Nor:tb..Ccntral.Uygsxn.rk..IGnc............ Phone No: SQ9-�i �.�r..�10-�A -Q S.7.................................
MailingAddress: 30A.S.MorguOt................................................................................. >.ia bozo...N.C......................................................... 2.45.43 ..............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:..
Onsite Representative: paul.hallgy....................
........................................
Certified Operator:')jmothy. ................................ 1110=5.....................
Location of Farm:
................................................. Phone No:...................................................
.......... Integrator: ........................
..............................................................
.......... Operator Certification Number:16789 .............................
kpprox. 8-10 miles on Hwy. 501 S. of Roxboro on the Chambers Loop Rd. on the left side approx. 114 of a mile from 501 +
3wy.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 36 Longitude 1 78 • 56 21
Design Current
Swine canarity Pnnulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
1500
0
Farrow to Wean
Lj Farrow to Feeder
Lj Farrow to FinisS
Lj t is
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acit Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total' Design Capacity 1,500
Total SSLW 202,500
"Number of Lagoons 1 ® Subsurface Drains Present IFTagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding,Ponds-1 Soiid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........,.pxxy.................
............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 22.
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 73-3 Date of inspection 4/25/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
®No
12.
Crop type Forest (Pines)
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16,
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
t I r:E f . l €E,[ �'i',{it EII_ u:{i€ , r. Ir 1j tl,r7rr�r.rgIVS11' i.i ., l:.E'.;;il, : -r .I,r "illl l iEi.. it Vl{!'S?!3R ., i;l."'S1�I� S.lilliltllllEil[Itl I,,1 Vi14C�:11'i11VR. i.l ; IR.Ii,V l l i::�? "I ".] iiir.,-E,'.1!i,I I11ni:1-.. "��'"'§.t .Il,.. Y q i kjq ., .i i •''�IIII.
}. , xplasn anyjYES�answer
,{ uestioii •"iL `� s and/or an ,reedmmendations'or:an other comments.,, Comments- refer�to q
y 4�ti�
Iii,I.
1+: I „y,. , .�,..
Ir 1, ,IdiiEd .YiI-f
E . 1,... � ?. 1. t i I t ihi{ [:' A cl t ki E4 ilil I �i ly[, !. i t. ' .E<[ , (i.i �S rll ESEEE 11 a E6,[t i �IIII l41eI,1.1l1Ltf6Rjllw<;ls'I�'iilillS�lSiilllliltlliSllllllllkliiil:LH�fr�.Vi�...,.,�:
Use drawings ofrfacrlity to better explain>situations +(use additional,page''§'aslnecessary)ti
• r ', {{ xr ll r I. r rI ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
'... �il l�k `�� .., t, , i E a.al I
�r�� i�+hi i�:
I ! 1 } d ilk 1 it il" ' ' t f � f .E ,I; r r 'fik €:� liil�t E';IV��1E €} i�4{`ia'E}.,i1.IS�E[• k�i111`�`�1.�IEli1� a �I�I��!i� Eir�l�El���"s�l�lylli{'l���kl.Y�p,SI%!"I�irlll':"!7i11114iit'iill".131:fllf.IIIFIRSR°:it'.154'i11`lell^.I�'7".RSISr51: S ,3�',1:1!i�si'..I' I I '.i
A
i y,. �i 9z "..'.lii10' I _3,11.;414j 11-i iDili i�tllP,i,:,�Ii1�{t III .1"iE'ii �il'���I{il ��,{(1i7iilEpj- tic j'i l�Vi )7(Ilii,i IPI. q jl jil`tfi E il.fi �E�l.I�i'll�ili �lll}si Ijt if li"" l
ij{
Reviewer/Inspector Name JD Hester � t 3 uli 1•,
, I;i �i #
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 Continued

4 g.33 £
E IEEE 9;;� �€
��t�€.ay1
Ou' 'a t�E
3
eIvisiorbfWaiii .6
_ �
!
ivisioin of Sail and Water, Cnnservat,oii '
" s
�a
"0 Other Agency`
i
.> I'tft ! .. al 3 I e.� ei �. E..: �.. i v -. . n.�.,.. .i
�'fi�,.. .. rE . E J _i..€.i .. F . �,' 34
.. cF;u l IFr.,Qj.i6
i 7 ll& i E iE3�1
tLL
'type of Visit ,0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
13 Permitted 0 CCeer(tifiedd+_ D�Conditionally Certified �16%egistered
Farm Name: 1Y" ..� 1. ^^'"'� � .. ..
OwnerName:...........................................................................................................................
7 D Time; I it - _ Printed on: 10/26/2000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
Date Last OperaTed or Above Threshold: .........................
County:....�..j�.hS /k
Phone No: ...../ `,/ mf —
...............................................................................
FacilityContact: ..................................................................:...........'title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: � Integrator:...................................................
....................................................................................................................
Certified Operator:....... r'._.V..!1. ......................................I ................ Operator Certification Number:,, k-;?-7 .....................
...............
Location of Farm:
XIIS'wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude • 4 1& Longitude ' 1 «
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Yean to Feeder ❑ I,ayer I I ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish j JE1 Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 1❑ Subsurface Drains Present E Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Im acty
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon .❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnan-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is [lie estimated now in gal/min'.'
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Str'ucturc I Slt•tlCture 2 Structure .3
Identifier: .... fin."........................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 92-4
5100
❑ Yes 1jeNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ®')No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes/o/No
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ZNO
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 7— Date of Inspection T Printed on: 1/9/2001
j
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes W40
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes O No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public. health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1PNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? []Yes A No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes .0 No
12. Crop type IIx7 ev dtaAd / T hcca
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
[I Yes
[ ]No
EN,
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑Yes
,�No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ZNo
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Io
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
,dN0
Required Records & DOCllments
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�'No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
g No
25.
Wgre any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q Yi ii9 :off' dgf cpen i 5 vv t e l� � �411'i4i; t lis;visa! Your 0 l; ee$iye tjti iFu>rt�l�r;
6t resin ridence: abvlif this visit. ....::.....::..:....:.....:.....:.. .

x Facility Number:,�r%3 —' Date of Inspection ? ° Printed on: 1/9/2001
5" Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes E]N' a
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
No
closure plan?
❑ Yes '0
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[]Yes ,0 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes PNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
�No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ,0 No
12. Crop type W— a" I k
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
i
❑ Yes No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Ia wo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ,E],No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ,� No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes []'No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
i
❑ Yes E] No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ANo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ONO
25. W re any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[]:Yes ❑ No
'.N4•yiQliiQt>js:o dfc�ec{e vtre pQte�tH`tng t�s:v�s�t; Yoh wjil><ee�iyeO o f1i4-tb+rr
coraresbinidefi& about+ this :visit: • .%.::...:::.....:...:::....:...::... .
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L4;, (!U 1 L-j7f-.--- Date: V/17S101 S/p I

Facility Number: 7 — Date of Inspection of Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes /140
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes )ZrNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes EJ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ]5No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or ,�
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover! ❑ Yes /NNo
Additional Comments an or' rawtngs• 5 ,,
T
5100

4'FROM PERSON CO FSA 910 599 6516 12-15-97 10:54AM TO
19195714718 " PA -
D.SWC Aninial Feedlot 01jeratin"11 Review
❑ DNNQ Auhual Feedlot Operation Sifte Inspection
Routine 00mvidsint 00TIwr I
.............. , . . . . .. . .
Facifitv Nuitiber
FarrnSlatus: roistered [] Applied for Permit
❑ Curtified . UPermitted-
Date of Imqjecflem
Tinw, of Inspection I IMW - J 24 hr. (hiumm)
Totid Time fin frw-Giit 411tillr%
(ex:1.24 for I hr 15 min)) Spent un Hes.iew
ot. III-q;eCtion jcicjujei ;1%1i0 jild pl-dwe"'illig)
Date I.-ast 0j)er a i et" I . ............ ...............
Farm NA le: ....... ......
4 Owner Name: ...... .................................
Facility
......... r47wl, ........
...... 7.2-wWi� •
------------- ......... .................
A0perator: ................. ................... ......... .......... ..................................
Location of Farm:
`-: n11111...... .................. "I ............ I ...... I ...........................................
GY . ........................... I ......................
Mime \0.
.............................. ....... . ........... ......... ........ ...
.......... WaAbo-eo .......... * ....... C ............
iHCl; rai or; .................................................... ........
Operator t,'L-i-liricalit')n Number! .........................................
L ............ Jw . .............. ;., _— 1
.......... ....... ........ ........
................................ I .......... I.-...".....- ................... . .... I ................ ................................... ................................. ....... .................... 1.11 ............ I ....... I .................... ­ ..............
Latitude.
C1 WCiM U) F"'e4:L1er
BTeeder to FiniAi
i 1', -:d
0 j,"arrow ti:i We,,)n
E) I �,u-row Tri Feeder
ID I`im,ow m Firij,";h
0
Design- Current.
C"Attie Capacity Population
FE] wiry I I I
JE3 Non -Dairy I I
Total Design Capaci(y. 1-54;ArL
T061. 5ST.1W
Number U Lagixins I Holding Ponds jE1SUhSt1rfhc-.cDrain 11'resenuW0,agmil -Area JEJ Spray fir!qtkrea
(Pei Will
�e4
I. Arc thcro Any haffers thaL need
Yes No
2. Is any Liichnr ration
ge observed fi-r.w) any ptirt ofLhc ope
Yc,., U
Di�CIIM'I'e 06JIUIC(I. at: 0 LaFoun os I ray field ' 0 Orher
-4. ffdi�r;Iiarge Is ohm�rvcd, was the C011VeYA1i*e V nan niadc"
❑ Yes!, ff<O
L wh Stiif- L wi� Ww�:r'! acitify D %VQ I b. If dk0mr­c:'& observed, did A re
0 Yes,- 0<1
C:. Udil,'I'Mrge is pbel'VUI, WhOt i.K (11C G�JjjjlMftl M4 in.gitlijili I?
d. DWS 0iS(7IM1rfC hypass 3lagoon ryqreni" (H've,, 11ofiry DWQ)
'r 'the
0 YC%
[here evidence , IOt
I. of qq mrov.1 LMI�a�iy 1),31�
4. Were: tIkv.rr;jny,
b Yt..;,. ffNa_.,:"_
Do�,nny part ofthe waste ni;niarg nient systvio (orher than 13'gouiwllokfing pOhds)',ic,^jtfirc »�.
4/30197
+
Confitmed on.

FROM 6PERSON CO FSA 910 599 8516 12-15-97 10:54AM TO 19195714718
•
P.6
i
Structures••(
�i'rynrl.cj
1, 1.��)ugs And/or l Iol(ling
9-
fc saarage capacity (i'rccbcrard plus srornl stor�i-'e) I, than adequate'?
❑ Yes
�,
[114 I'
r
F'rechoard (ft.): Strr�ciure 1 Structure ? Str•tlCture 3 Smicturc 4 Sauciarc i
i
Structure 6
10.
i,ti ticcpage observed fi-uitl any of' the .�tr,tcntres' ..............�...,,.....,.....,....................
................,......... ............. ..............
El Yes
„�o........----' ,
11.
Is erosion, or any other thrtuth to the integrity of any of the .arlictlires ob;crvcd?
❑ Ycti
I
12.
Do any of tale structures need tn.tinicnance/improvenlCnt''`
❑ Yes
n
(if any of gncstions 9-12 was answered yes, avid the situation posts
an hnniediali: public health or anvirounlcfatal threat, notify DWO)
.
1.3.
Do any of the structure; lack adequate miilimunl or maximuni
liquid level ruarkers?
❑ Yes
No
14.
Is there physical cvidcncc of aver applicatiun?
❑ Yes
. a
(Ifin exec~~ of WMP,.nr nrnilff ells t� water~ of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop rope ,(Ll� ���r
_ . .......t'........................ ................................... .............................................................. ......... .......... .........................
................
........ ...... ...,.
16,
Du the receiving crnha differ wiih those designated in the Animal Wasic Management Platt (.AWMP)'!- '' =
+ �' ❑ YcS
u
!.
17,
DcK:s the facility have a lack o1' adrqualr. as:rraac for land';1pFtlic.itiom?
❑Yes-
Tr:
._
. _'. r
18..
Does the tecclvin� crop neped im rovemen�
t,
❑Yes
o .
.�-..,_ - -
- - - --.
-, 19.
Is there a lack of available Waste application.equipment?
❑ Yes
2(1..
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
Wo
Y21:
Did Reviewer/inspector fuil.tu iii�cuss rcviLwJinspecrinn with ��tt-sitC tepee cntative? ,_
❑Yet
o _•
For Cerlifierl-
+..= 22:
Does the.faciliry fail to have a copy of the Animal Wi stc Management Plan readily availablc?- _.... _ - _
- ❑.Yes-
-❑ No.—
23.
Werc any additional probleins'tiu(ed which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. noes record keeping iced irnpruverrtcnt'►
❑ Ycti ❑ No
;CW1lnl,t4f8 [cr to'quesiiori �� ipt> �itiiVYN�QoI nmu, r�:lir4tV F-4i��etgith6W&Lu;tlrj'o,r
5!; t Q� �$ l (w )f81I1 •il UBfllitiV4lr� r :•o rave r a ^�� s1 ae ene +mow "•�.. UR..
1 ,.
d ct#A �. w �� it!diiitibnttl 1+ Itie���• W u .»�.�. .. .r4. 'N ..Y �•< .�.�, .0'. fwi .. " �q-,6'�
i
Reviewer/I�ettrr Name
Reviewer/l*wperlvrSignal.ure:l- >: 2.._.. _, w.. •-..._ ._._. . _., Datw'r
4 s
r- r
•;s.tr. Division of Water �1,u1f y„----carer QualitASectiuri;.1 acilily Asa�ssii?r�if. Uirit� sr �•,� ¢s r, ��, >2r,�
3-i�.+a; ,r. i� _..�.i::. , - .+..:,•'•... ... �.,,«: .x� i^4Y�".Z'i.a.c,s-. - «ca,Jj aaa'� 'b.- s - �'�r' L .•3 tr .� t '�sw"i�x -Sz "^Pea'-cKz i#`a;. +%...7,r''�'�i3�i.G,�s„�t ��
'L fit-. ,i_, �:,«ear „r.. wi, w-',.•3:� ....r �.... w�,.+: .n.-�2.-..,=.:.r;., �'�. :4.=.;i�a'''..1r�'.isl.37i;;d .��±n'7,._i�;r. �',.., .V '
.I
1 t f

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 12, 1996
North Central Livestock Inc
304 S Morgan St
Roxboro NC 24543
SUBJECT: Operator in Charge Designation
Facility: North Central Livestock Inc
Facility ID#: 73-3
Person County
Dear Fans Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to. Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., irector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, NvfC
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

} RECEIVED North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
Person County Center
304 S. Morgan Street, Room 123
DEC 30 fi Roxboro, NC 27573
WATER QUALITY SECTION December 29, 1997
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Sirs:
I am writing in regards to facility number 73�--3.`—(Nortth—Cerit-rK
Liv�.eT stock; Inc_:')I getting certified according to th oe 0 rules
and regulations. According to Jim Huey, Person County NRCS
Director, this facility will have to apply for a permit in order
to operate. Therefore, Jim and I are working on a plan to submit
to DWQ in January 1998 so North Central Livestock, Inc. will meet
state regulations. As stated in the attachment, this facility is
a drop off point for producers selling top hogs to Hatfield
Quality.Meats in Pennsylvania. I would appreciate it if you take
North Central Livestock, Inc. off your regular .0200 producer
list since the facility will fall under different regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel
free to contact Jim Huey (Person County NRCS Director) at 336-
597-2973, Phillip Whitfield (President of North Central
Livestock, Inc.) at 336-599-2401, or me (Person County
Agricultural Extension Agent and Waste Management Technical
Specialist) at 336-599-1195.
Sincerely,
Joey Knight
Ag. Ext. Agent
CC. Jim Huey
Terri Hollingsworth

.w
The North Central Livestock, Inc. is a facility that is used
only for 8 hours per week for swine farmers as a pick-up point
for top hogs being shipped to the packers. Only 300 top hogs are
in the building for that 8 hour period for that day.
Sincerely,
Phillip Whitfie d
President, NCL
4 �W�
Joey Knight
Ag. Ext. Agent
RECEIVE[)
DEC 301997
WATER QUAL-TY 3E�CfTpJ�{Iy`�

73-3
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
North Central Livestock Co-op
304 South Morgan Street
Roxboro, N.C. 27543
Subject:
Dear NC Central Livestock:
1LF9'XA
17
A&4p
Am
IDEHNR
Division of Environmental Management
September 13, 1995
Compliance Inspection Report
N Central Livestock Farm
Person County
On September 7, 1995, Mr. Steve Mitchell, from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Mitchell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface
waters of the state, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the
purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed.
Please continue to properly manage the waste and wastewater generated by this farm to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Environmental Management is required to enforce
water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are required to have an approved
animal waste management lan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical
specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions
regarding your inspection please call Steve Mitchell at [phone].
Sincerely,
J 4y Ga ett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Person County Health Department
Jim Huey - Person County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
RRO and Central Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carofina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycled/ 10%poet-coruimer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: September 7, 1995
Time:
Farm Name / Owner : North Central Livestock Coop
Mailing Address:304 South Morgan Street, Roxboro, NC 27543
County: Person
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/ Location: Chambers Loop Road
Type of Operation: Swine _XX_ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 1500
DEM Certification Number: ACE
ACNEW
Latitude: 36' 16' 12"
36 16' 05" . 81
Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number:
Longitude: 78' 56' 12"
78 56' 21" . 98
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour
storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes Actual Freeboard: 18 inches. Was
any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? No Was any erosion observed? No Is
adequate land available for spray? No Is the cover crop adequate? No
Crop (s) being utilized: None. This appears to be a transfer station with a lagoon to
handle the waste generated while the animals are being held.
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? Yes 200 Feet from Dwellings?
Yes 100 Feet from Wells? Yes
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue
Line? No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Steve Mitchell Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Pax:919-715-6048 3ul 20 195 17:42 P.161'17
FaAOhy IvUMW-
SITE Y1Si'I'ATION PEMP]3
D4kTe: 1,y a logs
. Ownet. . Ceint-A Litt s7nr k Coo -D Yacm Name:
CbtmtSrl -erScal
Ass"t visiting 5irr~ 3'..� t� - ,-.� Phone: 4 o - 597-al 7373
Oa She Repmc atudVIS! Phone;
Pisy�i�l Address; LoeiYr 1 y�4 E. a'fir b (5. ec.K bars _ �.� �,�,,,,_�
Jrluilirm ! 1Lii1r=.-,.
Type of (jptrativa; SwZr- J Patsltry clwc
DcSign Cepci;Y t 5 a o '3 t4umba of AniTnuh on Siff:
1,wilotta: 3! �.o t [a i �- LoczRadc: �_,o -S-e- ' f "
Type of Ingpectica: Omund ✓ Acriai
Cattle Yss or tic
Does the Ar�mW Wma Ligccn have iuZxc[=t fmctaaed of 1 Fcct -25 yeo- 1-4 `:our A0 M, event
(approtimalely 1 Foot T 7 m6a,)(''ras r Flo Actual r w^c:rd; �. ! �� -42— imbe;
for facilities wills more th= crz?ggnnt%pJ=c iddmss cbe to e
cusms%cltts sec60a.
Wns any scclugc observed i.'om t I= Yd$ o�
Is act: ciss= land av0zbl: fur land enpiiruiic n? Ycs a No Is .hc csvc- troy adxua!=? Yas cr .N'a
Ad:liLu,,:tl Con:mcnr5:
Ftt ro (9 la) 713-3ss9
N c - I'V`'�
Sirt uurc of A

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
EDF.=HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 25, 1997
North Central Livestock, Inc.
304 S. Morgan Street
Roxboro, North Carolina 24543
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 73-3
North Central Livestock, Inc.
Person County
Dear Mr. Knight:
On June 10, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
I would like to remind you of the requirement to have an approved
Animal Waste Management Plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must
be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or
assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely,
qadylarrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Person County Health Department
James Huey, Person Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, oft, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%4 ;C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% reGycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number
Farm Status: GYftegistered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and nrncesflino)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....................................
Farm Name:..... cx.... ........�-1.�i..._.
Land Owner Name:..F Ai).X ._WdtlAltitic 1 .........? G �
Facility Conctact:-i� . . Title: .._..................
Mailing Address.... 1r?s _S� »....TAQ�(. 1 .......... vlc6 .ny
Onsite Representative:
County:........ �1 PA ....................... .......................
Phone No:.. .S�i ._S.Sj ......i:� 5��.......................
Phone No: �a?�11._�a..-..`_S
Integrator:
Certified Operator:..., V....`f1��.k .9................... .................Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• 0' ="
Type of Operation and Desien Caoacit,
Wean
Other
Longitude =• =' =..
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [g-No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 04-My
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVtnin? N' A,
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [9-M
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes G3<o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑moo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes i j o
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97 Continued on back

Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
StrMetures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft). Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
... 2:..ir A ..... ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [a'No
❑ Yes 93 o
❑ Yes [ 1C o
❑ Yes L9'No
Structure 5 Structure 6
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
Of in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..... ��........................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? "o #'WM'P
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For CertifiedF'acilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes 2-1Go
❑ Yes Ml<o
❑ Yes R<o
53/yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 09-Po
❑ Yes Its Flo
❑ Yes 21�o
❑ Yes G;_No
❑ Yes [94qb
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality ection,.Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax : [phone]S Jul 20 ' 95 17 : 42 P. 1f i 17
raaay N►,mw. 73
yITE YXSIT MOM P'RMRI)
Ownec . C"D Farm N8t::c:
County:P�rswl
Agee! Visiting Sites ,�;..._ �4 c'honc: 4l C - 547-2473
Otk $itc RePrrxcnW11vu: Photo:
Physical Addreas: Lmd-w* 1 - Y,4 E. fl� O (5, as! hers _ �•d_ +��� L
Mailing hddi=.
Tyne of OP=1147a: Swim hz Poultry G3tua
ne sign Cspacity: Is 0 a ?rummer of Animalx on Sitt.
L zrirude: 3la,,,,� t 4a ' 11 ' Loagitndr;, 3_o
Type of Insp=d=: 0mund „�, Atrial —
cimla Yea of.No
Does Eba AninW Waste Lageen have iuTicicnt frtcbanr-d of I Fcct � .25 year 24 ` our s.or:A evcui
(Approximately I Foot +7 ,Io Aclual
r -ar far;Pitias wills morn than c" iagorm, plemsc address the cO:cf Sagenns' rx-- ward mdrx the
csmruncstts sec';no.
Wns any scg3aV obscn-cd:&*m ILa-- 14gcN1(s)1 Yes ojcs� Nas�'1-.= cresian o; tt= 0&
2s aci:rluL:c land availAble ±os iand e, Oicatkm7 Ycs at -tia is ,he orvcr cL =dxa . *. 'S'�s ar .
Fs_t ra (919) 713-35.19
Sicf=tum of
I a ' 306d
t _ t s, , CZ -11-1i