680012_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Animal Waste Storage fond and Lagoon closure Report F'
(Please: type or print all information that does not require a signature? � \ -
GeneralInformation: 1§
Name of Farm: LA7729S Sw hne FJ21Y? Facility No: - f;2�
4tvner(s) dame:-__L_--E. LArM � SQ,-, (Pa.c,.l. 64t14)
iv[ailin� Address: 3a o Phone No: 9�9•:73' • -4 2
t-1,'/156oroLtAA,T AIG 27o2_78 County: 0k9,0Te- - -
Operation Description remaining animals only):
0 Please check this box if there will be no animals on this Carm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure. please provide the following information on the animals that wiill remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Artintals
J wean to Feeder
:) Feeder to Finish
Z) Farrow to wean
Z] Farrow to Feeder
u Farrow to Finish
Type n Poultry No. of Animals
Laver lo000
J P�tll:ts
I'Dri UlAer a usa*iM
Orher Type of Livestock:
Type of Cattle
:1 Dairy
Z! Beef
No. of Animals
Member of Animals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold'? Yes &' No CI
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes-? Yes (33" No ❑
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm'?: I
(Name) - ;5ID A¢st" of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division
of Water Quality's Re,7ional Office (see map on back)
was. contacted on 6124-1oz date) for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon.
This notification was a� st 24 hours prior to the start of closure which began on --Qt (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan which meets
all MRCS specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21
of the North Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of
Signature:
t): l kuL Laifa- �ay__La la's Swkykt :QLrm
Date: oz-
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical
Guide Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all wa-si—e
liquids and sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate. all input pipes have been
removed, all slopes have been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: Crarnnc So:1 , Wa�-i
Address (Aue
Signature:
hone No.: `l 19. 214 5• 2165
late: ..7%2
I/
Return within 13 aays followincy completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
I N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Water Quality Section
Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, LNC 27626-0535
PLC - l t'1:1V ;, 1996

State of North Laroiina
Department of Environment,
uen-l+h and N-atural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 15, 1997
L.E. Latta & Sons
Latta's Swine Farm
1.30E soyernor Burke Rd
Hillsborough;`C 272173
Subject: Removal of Registration
uranee County
Dear L.E. i :t:a I- Sons:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an active animal
waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to 510,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid waste system
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
.m
cc: taal"eigliZVater_Quu— it RcgiiEn—'_Office��
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
S",
A. Preston Howard, ]r.,'P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 9
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative action Employer 50% recycle

':;• it
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routines:-O Complaint O Follow-up of DNVQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review .. O Other, -71
Bate of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection t 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in traction of hours
Farm Status: EJ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit {cx:1.25 for'] hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ....................................................
Farm Name: County: ....................
OwnerName.............................................................................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: Title: - ----- - - -- Phone No:
MailingAddress:......................................................................................
;" Onsite Rep resentative:,Pav ....................L.O. �..1.,..1.....
Certified Operator: .................................................. ............................
Location of Farm:
........................................................................................................... ..........................
...................... Integrator:........................................................... ....... ......... ...........
...................... Operator Certification Number .........................................
0
'a
Latitude C a Longitude • 4 r iG
Type of Operation Design ^Current F Design Current '`: z Design Currents
Ca:: acit }4.Pa elation Potiltr ` v .
Swine P Y P Y .:,Capacity Population Cattle „Capacity Population ,
FED Wean to Feeder Layer (J ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean 3
Farrow to Feeder f z 3
Total Design Capac><ty
❑ Farrow to Finish
Other z
, .`
TotaI;SSLW
Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area p Spray Feld Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'!
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4130/97
maintenance/im;jrovemenO
�--- -
'-, .
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ['No
❑ Yes �] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
h No
❑ Yes
j No
❑ Yes
V,o
❑ Yes
No
Conlin uedron
back

r
Facility Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Qf No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes VNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?.; ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons -and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 16 No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 1 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
..........1...`.........................�-.....:1.5 .........................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes V(No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [21"No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
4 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
11
26 Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
jNo
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
P h'F............................................
.
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
V(No
17.
Does the facility have a Iack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
. [ INo
.18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
9No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
O No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
d No
For Certified Facilities Onlv
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
rn�€ ?, .��s^'a�` � :` �. � �_�:.:r�.<sssee�, a .,. as �aa �-• s x e ;.ianz€ x� Pm;--�s s� ✓t a i.
Gcr men (refer to qu E>i►a #) EExpla `any'YF.S answers aridfor any re,eommendatt :ar any dtMr comments
T1se'drawings o�facilit{to better explain situations use additional
ar �' rc ,..
eD
k-ertI 11
L' U 9R 6A1 try e80G41V G. - �-� �' - ?)-19.) TO C /- 4 se D u ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature.
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality section, Facility Assessment Unit
-. , Date: II
4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
L.E. Latta & Sons
Latta's Swine Farm
1306 Governor Burke Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
Dear Mr. Latta &
EDIEHNF;Z
April 3, 1997
JECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
V=rt : r, Latta's.Swine Farm
Facility Number 68--12
DFHNR RALEIGH Vie,
Orange County
REGIONAI nF Irr
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in. no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and.
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely, NN��
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet l
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File -
Enclosure
-P.O. Box 29535, ��y. FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 NWfc An Equal Opportunity/Affirmofive Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

r
i
State oJ N +rth Carolina
Departr, elit of Environment,
Health O Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr„ P.E., Director
DIVISION OF
July
1DaF4NF;Z
WATER QUALITY
14, 1997
Mr. L.E. Latta
1306 Governor Burke Road
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 68-2 Latta's Egg Ranch
68-12 Latta's Swine Farm
68-43 Little Brook Farms
Orange County
Dear Mr. Latta:
On July 1, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the animal operations were not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
I would like to remind you of the requirement to have an approved
Animal Waste Management Plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must
be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or
assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely
oTo-d
Jaddy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Brent Bogue, Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRo Files
P.O. Box 29535, N���16 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 276264)535 �� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10°6 post -consumer paper

45
f ., § y ^�� e '-"'4 '.', b, Px •w is z€'� X�F,. x �''.'.'^•Y
❑ DSWC Animal .feedlot Operation Review
�" ��' "�'�`` ii sr 3 �,:# � �� ��. � 7 n'+�,:4 t� 4�„w� £� "• r� x � -, � a c,� <�#A �' '°', � k - �. �� r � �°� �^'" f -" � i �� � - ,
,:�, �� °L � �� � �,� m�VVQ Animal Feedlot Operation Sl.te Inspection , �
�` ;� s,F„`�",,a�� t as-:S� m • "3'',� ,��i �? � 'i � .9�x,<xi:��,"F` .'<� i� � z �`.'.i' k �' � � °fir
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 'l �
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
FarmStatus* ((2-eegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted lor Ins ection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not II`Operational Date Last Operated-______.... . » »»»- _..........»»....._......r.__ ..__...._........... ....
FarmName:..._,....-. C..__— ............. Cou nty:...',�4�!a.. __...........• .»........».....-_.
Land Owner Name: �: »C'+.,.» _. ....»��. J Phone No: A�A�.. �.....».._ .
Facility Conctact:.. �C�*�? `.... �—'.�.......»,»........ Title: +?�..^i��l'a�. t!, 1.�»» Pltone Na:.... ......__..............
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:. rt:h�_ �.. Integrator: �.._ ...:.._.. _..
Certified Operator:. csL .4.�...... `- __....... _..... ._....» »......_....._..., Operator Certification Number: -.......... .... _»..... »_....._».
Location of Farm: SV__ Vv�%
.. .
...... ......... ..».....__....--....-....... —..... ......... __.... ......... ......... _....... .—................ ..... _................ »_...._ ..... _ ...._....... _..._._...... _....._ .....—..... _.........
....—».... �
Latitude 9 & Longitude 0 4 14
Gengral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -trade?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes U<0
❑ Yes [04
❑ Yes too
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Q901
❑ Yes
R<O
❑ Yes
UK
❑ Yes
aio
Continued
on back

Far4;ityNumber:.. ...—..,.,..
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
1 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
StructilEgs f LagoQtlj and/or,Iloldinoonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes [RVo
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes M-7�o
❑ Yes C$-<o
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes Eg- o
❑ Yes M"No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [des ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ^^/
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? L3'Yes ❑ No
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ow. Ll <.
(If in excess of.WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type _.......
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Mana ement Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
<O
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? Q
❑ Yes
l l
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
El Yes
.t<oo
�k.
t�' oo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El yes
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,M<0
l_ Ko
FQr
22.
Certified Facilities Qnly
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments _(refer toquestaom #) Explain -any YES answers and/or any recomniendations'or any, other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pagesNas necessary)
000eC,-, r-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: `1
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

l
Facility Number
Date of Inspection —1 1
tip.
Time of Inspection 2® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: [i I&Ostered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Ins ection includes travel andprocessing)
6?f4ot Operational Date Last Operated:.... .. Z..�_......».„...„......_.............. ._....... ._............._....._»..... _...._.»......._.....
Farm Name:...., ,��.._� 1f { '� 1L1�» .. _ »..- County:... __r.�.............„...... ..
Land Owner Name: » t �._ ..._... _.�....�........... _.......Y..... Phone No: Ca 11) D. ... _..1 !,.. ......_..... ..
Facility Conctact:.»PGti 4�? , _........ Title: .����A�,t ...„„ Phone No:... ,�1 .r..........�...p»�.......
Mailing Address: Jn WL
. 1...'i►�k��Qa+.�.....L�,C ....lip......
Onsite Representative: ....t_,,.....„„...„ „ .._.�. 4�!... ..... ........_..... ... Integrator: M....N.�... .........
..... _ .....„.................... _.
Certified Operator: »»l r-'�: ,_....._....._.».._..., Operator Certification Number:.........
Location of Farm: A WV►lq_ �.j,,,SA— c-N�— �Vvher42Cjfic�, '�� tc-
Latitude Longitude �• ��µ
Type of Operation and Design Capacity£'� Design G�rrentY , p ;Design Current _ Design Current
SWine rY, H aci Po w "cation'' Cattle -. f t ,v€
. Ca aci Po elation Popp,* a aci •Po elation
[RVean to Feeder 1 al01❑ La er 10 Dairy
X I
❑ Feeder to Finish " ❑ Non -La er IQ Non -Dairy
—Farrow t0 Wean z Fi e , m t Fx
'��
Farrow to FeederTotalDesignCapacity ,
1171 arrow to Finish I
E
❑ Other r
a
txr�a ��p`�.x
s.
umber of Lagoons/ Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present We
❑ Lagoon Area Q ❑ Spray Field Area
s.rr���rtti
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0- o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Oatro
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. 'If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes O Pta
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes an
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? t4 &_
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes P90
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑-Ko
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes "o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ;Koo
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

' Facility Number:... ... ,,,..
r
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes [fNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding_Pottdsl
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft. Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
...r. ... ....e.S . ..... _.....
la Zt
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 09'1 o
❑ Yes 6?'1i0
❑ Yes ErNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes„ and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Walfie Applicajion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of, WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type -..».ems C 'ij.Q__............. .»....... ......... ..,..................................... .......... .................. ........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? W (I AL.►S �A t
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Qn]X
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes [9-1Qo
❑ Yes M-No
❑ Yes M No
GKes ❑ No
❑ Yes BNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ©<o
❑ Yes ®-No'
❑ Yes M<o
❑ Yes P-Wo
❑ Yes [Pro
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments ,(refer to question #) .Explain any YES answers and/or any, recommendations or any other comments.,
Use diawmgs of facilityto better ex' plain situations: (use si3ditiona! pages as necessary) y y
4
1Lc34�S
'�-�n ���u1 e.,c�, -�v gnu, v�(t�1►,, rc�� Vti vsc•��-�-, C �`
Wc`S rnC� re�rv�Otii'e-d�
N
Reviewer/InspectorNamec;i�aw"r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %46VUI k Date: "�`t,q1
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Se don, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facility Number
Farm Status: �0stered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection I `l
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0
or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑Not Operational Date Last Operated:.
Farm Name: ��}_V' �� � Corn r
...... :...........„....... .............._......_..__ ...! county: __c.�„��� .... .......... .... __..... _,.........
Land Owner Name:. ..... . ...0 . ..........._...._ Phone No: �� \-�l ... ........ ..........
Facility Conctact:? ..../ Title:„ ....»„ Phone No: .„.21�.„„...._„......
Mailing Address:......4�...�.1!�
Onsite Representative: .'t^"....„„.................. ....... Integrator:.....„............... „..... „ _.............. _...... „
Certified Operator: „..,�.0 `..... Operator Certification Number:_.. . ... . ....
Location of Farm: SSr'm V (e_,- $R. %V_A Q i-, O�WA %-I
Latitude 4 K Longitude • ` «
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
?^v" _ h j A - -. s. 3 4 i w "1 V
x'Designz `Current `Design*� Currents F:<a Design %,Current 4
'x,Pouit� Cattle µ nSwioe� .ry..Ca aei " Po n titian a , a tea..
. r.%:Ca aci �;Po' ulation Ca' aci "SzPo ui tion4,
❑ Wean to Feeder❑ La r ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer, RE 152VV on -Dairy 1
Farrow to Wean .............
171 Farrow to Feeder TataI Design"Capaerty
Farrow Furash� ►1 Y z�
w� .. t
❑ Other ��
A;^, � .` °..3
az aNumber of°I,�agoons/ Holding Ponds w� ❑ Subsurface Drams Present
��,e -
E nLagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes mro
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [9-No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? (--]Yes ❑-Wo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E l o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Ei1ro
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes GJ hlo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [I#o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes G;R o
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued an back

]'Failhy Number:. l:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Erllo
t 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes B-Igo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes M-M�
Struclures JLpgQozjs and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? # j' A
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 1.(
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 14k
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Wnstg Application ti
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
I5. Crop type ......... ............... .»...... ......» . ............ ................................................................. ................. ........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #)£f� Explain my YES answers and/or any recommendations :or any',ather comments -
Use drawings of facility to better�explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary}:
4
oS
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: -
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
L.E. Latta & Sons
Latta's Swine Farm
1306 Governor Burke Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Latta's Swine Farm
Facility ID#: 68-12
Orange County
Dear Mr. Latta & Sons:
PW
EDEHH FZ
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O, Box 27687, 4CRaleigh, North Carolina 27611 7b87 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
NVoice 919-715-4100 .,.. 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

JUL- t4-1ge5 , 1S=26 FROM DEN WNTER QUALITY SECTION TCJ
RRO P.02z02
Site Requires Isnmedi ate A !ten 1 or,
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL rF=LOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE. _ Oct � 9 , 1995
Time:
` Farm Name/Owner
Mailing Address:
County r41u e-
Incegraror. Phone:
On Sire Reoresenmrivc: Phone:.
Physical Addressa ocation:
Type of Opera- don: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Ladrude: Longitude: �.�" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the .A_v imai Waste Lagoon have sufficienr free -board of 1 Foot + 2.5 y. 2d hour storm event
9or(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) No Acrual Freeboard: �t. Tnches
Was any seepage observed froth the lagoou(s)? Yes 06 Was any erosion observed? Yes or 1 0
Is adequate land available for spray'? e or No Is the coves crop adequate? or No
Crop(s) being utiUze& f
Does the facility tweet SCS x&nimum s'l-thack criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellinallo
Cyr No
100 Feet from Wells?
�ryr animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
a:iirnai wasTe land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS iyTap Bluff Line'? Yes 64DO
T.s animal wane discharged into waters of the state by lean -made ditch, flushing system, or other
;irni?aT- man-made detinces3 Yes v0-N-10 1f Yes, Please Explain.
'.)iMs Iric fa(-ility tuaintain adequate waste nLuiagCtmcnt.records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on s-pcciflc acreage with i�-ver crop):' Yes or No �
'
Additional Comments: ^/ v Q e 4G ,o h —
h�—
e
cc: Facibry Assessment Unit
ei
00 - -Sable �JrO,4P17 -ar Y>@e f�
Use Attachments if Needed.
0
TOTAL P.02