680009_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please typo or print all information that does not require a signatures
raI life f'.
j,
Facility No: 1L
Qn
Qwt)erf S) Hatrtt: k • - -
lvlailine Address:34%5_- �1iG 5?6Q N - --- - Phone No:. 119 -Z3d�""
is ar ��- Kc.— �1�.rI. - _ County:�K5f
tI 1�}pggjgsiott f r apAn g -v
tease check this box if there will be no astitnab on this roan after lagoon closure. If thsre will still he animus oa the site
after lagoon CID&=, pksse provide the following ln[amadon an the animal% that will remain.
gaN adon wrintt'lon.
Ti•pe of 5wille No. of Animals
Z Wean to Feeder
Z. Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean
M Fwtow to Feeder
7 Farmm% to Finish
;i Gilts
_s Scam
TjPe afAvtrlrrr Na of Animals
Z� Layer
:1 Eton -Laver
Type of Serf No. of Aninutlr
stood
Z) Feeders
:I-Swc leers
Other Type of j,ivettoek_-
W ill the Farm maintain a number of animals greeter than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in optration at this, farm after diis one closes?,
How many lagoons are left in wt an this farm !J0 YI.�
Type of Deirr No. of Animals
❑ Milking
7 Dn
0 Wei (en,
C) Calves
Monbrr of Anitne is:
Yes =1 Nc)
Yes ;3 No
(SaInel -,T. o. tiesi+er I of the Water Quality Section's staff in the DiOsion or
Water Quality's Kai Je ` 1 h Regional Offica rare map on back) wms contacted on ILR1--D3 ,darer
For notification of the perdi , closure of this posed or lagoon. This notifttetion was at least ?s hours prior to the
Stat-t of closure. which began an De-C. 1111003 (dare).
t verify that the abovg inforn-rAtion is correct and ;crnplete. 1 have followed a c1mure plan. which me. -Is all NRCS
specifications and criteria. 1 realize: that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 3 t of the ?north
Carolinas General Statutes if l fail ,o properly clone ouc the lagoon.
Name of Land Owper tl3lease r7tint
Signature:_ �— L-)-_
Date. �1- Z'& 0- C-P
'; he facility has followed u etosore plan which meery all requirarne:ttts se! forth In else y'RC5 Technical Guide
Standard 99&. The following items were: completed by the owner and Veriflea by me- all waste liquids and
cludgrs have been remo�sd and land applied at agronomic rate. all input pipes have been removed. ail Siopsts have
been stabilized or, necessary. and vegetation established on all disturber! areas.
Name of Technical Specialist [Plc" Prints;
Afflliatian: not kol L 5'n t
Address (
cl
r
—91S--_754
Dute oq
Return %ithin 15 daps rolluwing completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon clessum tat
N. C. Dicisi0U Of Water Qmlitr•- Water Qttasiitr Sect9nn
Compliance Group
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 276"-1617
sOE)1�00'd �[sE EIS 6E6 `E9� on NNHON N11 i�fOW1i0.[4-'8ti�

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Ra 7� Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 22, 2004
Lewis Crabtree
3415 NC 86 N
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Re: Lewis Crabtree Farm < �
Permit Rescission
Permit # AWS680009
Dear Lewis Crabtree,
Thank you for closing your lagoon. Permit number AWS680009 has rescinded because
you are out of the hog business and the lagoon at the farm has been closed. You should no longer
receive invoices for your annual permit fee but if you do, please contact me at [phone],
ext. 571 or Paul Sherman at [phone], ext. 529.
cc: Paul Sherman
Fran McPherson
Farm file 468-9
J.D. Hester, Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
NCDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1.877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699;1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affimtative Action Employer
50% recycled / f 04e post -consumer paper
httpYlh2o. enr. state.nc. us

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 14, 2000
Lewis Crabtree
Lewis Crabtree Farm
3415 NC 86 N
Hillsborough NC 27278
Iffl?W'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS680009
Lewis Crabtree Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Orange County
Dear Lewis Crabtree:
In accordance with your application received on June 2, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Lewis Crabtree, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Lewis Crabtree Farm, located in Orange County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 180 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and Iimitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]B
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS680009
Lewis Crabtree Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Don Friday at [phone] ext. 533.
I
jyR Rf11_fr
IGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Sincerely,
?' Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Orange County Health Department `
MaIeigli Regional-Office,_Wat re Qiiality:Section z
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources WA Ra A t �Ep
Division of Water Quality i1YSEC770N
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form !1
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) ����
Now
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste OperatiNn- schaf99 PO
MV1Gng
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please review the
information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate, if a question has not been completed by
the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: _Lewis Crabtree Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Lewis Crabtree
1.3 Mailing address: 3415 NC 86 N _
City, State: Hillsborough NC Zip: 27278
Telephone Number (include area code): 732-8884
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): NC 86 & Walnut Church Rd. 5R, 1 UUi
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/78
1.9 Dale(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 68 (county number); 9 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
180- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; Dno. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish � 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 68 - 9

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system):,V,a *5� ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): — _+*75- 11 .A4q AC .
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): WASTE �WW.sf PIr5 UNDt U4F-Aiti µau5r6
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or PN
(please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
(Npi AfPL AbL£ uL,jlti pppst.Airr.&G '$LACE C-,r(,YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited'?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited'?
3. REQUIRE!? ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing,your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operatiants;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Srnne of drese components Wray not
have been required at the tinie the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field,
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
4-3.3.10 A site schematic.
-3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
—3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 68 - 9

Facility Number: 68 - 9
F I't xi I;. C bt F
R
wq�Q�C��VED
�U�ON
act > y amc. ewes ra rcc arm 0�?OOO
4. PLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: No�D�hd�o
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest 111%
this application for (Facility name listed in question I.I)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of m knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments arc not included, this application package
will be returns me as incomplete. '
Signature Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 68 - 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Lewis Crabtree( Lewis Crabtree Farm )
Location: Orange County, North Carolina
Telephone:
Type Operation: Swine
Number of Animals: 180 head
(Design Capacity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be
applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they
have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5
tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10
tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters, which is not
allowed under DWQ regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce
the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Storage Pond
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, fe, tons, etc.)
180 animals x 839.5 ** (gal) waste/animal year 100 (% confinement time) = 151,110 gallonsof
waste/year .
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced'Per Year
(PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
180 animals 12 lbs. PAN/1000 gals = 1813 lbs. PAN/year. (If Broadcast ) 633-42 Table 17B
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the
waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown
and surface application:
Ta61e I: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
Field
Soil
Lbs. N*
Lbs. N
Month of
#
#
Type
Crop
Per Ac.
Acres
Utilized,
Application
2319
2
HrB
Fescue Grazed
180
5.3
954
.Feb — May
Sep - Nov
2319
3a
Or
Bermuda
93.75
.55
51.56
Apr - Sep
Pasture
2319
3b
Or
Bermuda
93.75
.98
91.86
Apr - Sep
Pasture
2319
3c
Or
Fescue Grazed
116.25
3.47
403.4
Feb — May
Sep - Nov
2319
4
HrB
Fescue Grazed
180
1.8
324
Feb — May
Sep - Nov
2319
5
HrB
Fescue Grazed
180
.4
72
Feb — May
Sep - Nov
2319
8
Gc13
Fescue Grazed
135
1.0
135
Feb — May
Sep — Nov
2319
10
HrC
Fescue Grazed
168.75
10.4
1755
Feb - May
Sep - Nov
r
This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must he based on realistic
field ex ectation.
N07E: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal 7nne Management Act will
require farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
* Nitrogen rates have been reduced by 25 % on those fields designated as grazed.
2

Nupif7:xR vv VA065 1P0
/ W A �T� j-Io�zAGE
l L,%NDQRNMTH H DU5C1i
�?-LME�15Id►�`� OF PITS
De PT k�►a�,�r� la�>ar+�
DEPTH 11C1a'iN L4..►1L-1�+
Hoy
1(, 1((11 UUSDL 6TD.
—plTt TUINLL'` Co\rC.TLED
— No - RuNUF,r Lfotb VqNn ?r-T5
CLu . Fr.
+ I + 4 z.. 4+ CO. Fr
TbTA L. io 3 9.14 Co. FT.
�l ' J :L. rl 6AL_ -W15 5ioQAGti Y'ULUTAL
03- qz `�� •: C rat )1DA11 jFl�.�r► AL X ItO +�UV) = 4 1LI GAL-6 J`DA'I
F� Dirt To V'V416 H
U &A L h �� fL ,
� loUu c,��.5. = f a+� L13S. aF N1Ypl.
wAbxE I ON[
DA�6 hIDPW,[ .I M PITS

Your facility is designed for 66 * days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once everyZ.0 * MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed maximum liquid level as indicated.
*See Narrative of Operation
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
The effluent from the waste storage pits are to be broadcast on fields 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4, 5, S, 10.
The waste storage pits located underneath the hog houses have adequate storage capacity for
about 66 days. The waste storage pits are totally covered and receive no runoff. The total volume
of the temporary storage will need to be removed on an average of once every 2 months. NOTE:
that no effluent is to be applied during the months of Decemberand January; and it is
recommended that the temporary storage volume be applied by the end of November to ensure
adequate storage capacity for December through January. Temporary storage volume must also
be applied at the end of May to allow adequate storage volume till the end of July. 1.53 ac. of
bermuda pasture located in fields 3a and 3b will utilize 143 # of nitrogen approximately 11,917
gallons of waste based on Technical Guide Standard 633-42 . Bermuda grass pastures will utilize
enough hog waste to give adequate storage till September. In September waste will be spread on
fescue pastures. If waste analysis continue to test on average 6.3 lbs. of nitrogen 1 1000 gals. it
would allow almost twice the amount of gallons to be applied per acre. It is important to analyze
effluent before application in order to broadcast waste accordingly and avoid over applying
nutrients.
97

CROP YIELD EXPECTATION
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
PROD.
Bermuda
Pasture
(ton/ac)
Fescue
Pasture
(tons/ac)
Herndon B
4.8
Herndon C
4.5
Georgeville
3.6
Orange
2.5
3.1
Bermuda Pasture
Fescue Hay
PAN per Unit
50 lbs/ton
50 Ibs/ton

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
Conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are
subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division. of Water
Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. ' The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner
who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a
change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or
available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss
shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used
where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required
by DW,Q. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a
season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the
Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
s

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control
conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on
soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on
bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This
distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative
filter strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior
converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
6

WASTE UTILIZATIONPLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a
maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event
in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (waste storage pond embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special
vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect
the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Waste storage pond areas should be kept
mowed and accessible. Waste storage pond berms and structures should be inspected
regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels,
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
should be kept on site.
etc., should be inspected on a
A regular maintenance checklist
7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization
plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface wasters of
the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24 hour storm. The
approved plan will be filled on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local
Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DWQ
upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER:
(Please print) ��pp
Signature:
Date: 5 3 / -- „2=a0o
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) Ke,lnneiH , K LAA,
Affiliation: ARP MGR; SoCL 11. t-j1ATtYL Cau eta AT C as 'Or-5
Address (Agency): 36(,- D t eve.[
W__S 0 0 cxLV K, mc, q ru "1 t
Signature:,YgAnj,�'
Date: S'`,)1 - Z60o
8

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN :::�:]
PROJECT/FARM
DATE:
Pits have 2.0 ft of storage. Pits should be monitored to insure that liquid levels do not
exceed this level. No outside runoff or rainfall enters these pits. These pits are
located underneath the houses and are not subject to the 25 yr. storm.
A visual inspection of the pits will be per 'formed at least twice a year. The inspector
should check the condition of the walls of the structure, The inspector will need to
look for signs leakage on the walls. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage. All water lines within the houses should be inspected to
insure no additional fresh water is leaking into the pits. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations. (See
Narrative of Operation)
• Maintain all waste handling equipment —pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc. --
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization plan.
The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
_66—days or months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of file
effluent.

LE(BENp FA@xLtr%i LoCArl4u MP
,, -- (-7eScNE LPIZAZED
BERMMOA GRAZED
S � RZt � "S'i' �'� a �! � •i 7iS - w"i'' " +SR � � i ,. 7
S web . ~ . a� ,; ; 3 .. a J" 'n od
} .� Ma}etr xqq} ?.4 t^IiSi 1�ta♦y f{.r' 2{�y{'1=1
i iyi�` ,�"�; .' 4W ' �• 1 9� �� 1., }'f�� 4 11� W ,� 'r �� 1 �-` `•k •i� � [ � y.
�� � ,�r.�y q� '. r ` ,1 �k 1 ! � � �tt�s` � . t;r., � � '•b ii '„ �� . ya � �s I
wept. �• �!'a"'
r s• "(�: i
1
17 1`,4 tF!''i�� �• s:Ee�, tl•g �i k9 •� f.. ��+:,�•�,����c liFi ^F.����'�., �,;�I �. ��i•,f ��.�a �.k f'. z'i� �{{ ; of �i' -v
vLik " r i-
34aF. ( { 4� �}��1�� °�` >; ;, i t ` � p�:YB� �i i�+� �`�r�� ��a��c�• ,���ay +� ��E 'r, 4i r _ � ;
3 0f/
4��4t�;;���4 :R�-°t7� � � � } M f`� nr.a �,} j "�.p'''r•!kga� ` ,Y��� 4i .f,r a�+�S
�.t�i,,,, A' r JI �SY'tl'c g-i r'��Y }itg t •,i F y"+r- $° yrIr�" f: •Si:- `f �:5:-. �.'' ��i
�,4rS. r � `i:,.�[`K;"6 jiYF 1 �i�4 �!'�':r� tt(' i � �`Lr° 4• w'4►iF ry }r,: sr� a � � i •� - _ �„.,�
h
ri . 1 t ! �:c s' � � i � , � a � t�' i.a:.k.-� FY*i!� ►4'4t �`tr'+`1�d�"' .�' s`�r a 'ti i '"' �',�"'' �'•r '
z iq
mom '�.FX �a �'�t�-�6n��•� r�I R• � `��- ♦ � ��p ,� ey�
��� $ i� rJ� ��"{�. g y ' �� �yf ��'; �,.�q:• F'.�.i�i-r�� - g ��y �'� 't � •"eTh-'�4''4"' re�"� r,� ,4 � �•�1.4
�� � !��! iri4�q'�'=',"#-1� ��•=f� �f i '� �' � e' � .� •,m • ���;at rr c � .,S$ a �4� a =+��r� 1'�r � if�S�h1�["�"� �' a �,t
� �i• � s��) fiq�'i ��{l� g j � '� t ��� 1�,� , ( arti }�a.!'/t -c � �"y^ ° ,�$2��''�"« T' + �" ?y „t �'�`�"r{
�Wa �a ``tY��_ �n �. �°���.,,'�' t1t �E $'x"SY�g�it{1 ..�ir3i ��( ,; •..,.t 4�ia s :~ t�'1'S F i .L+11- 1•?.� zi7��Ly� `'i:'' %..la��y�;."'.� �� f ���
i r '�..�> � �,,�`,�,�L �'g l t � � � �`" �. .. �'��,CF`.. l y Z'7t' r�es" � ..�j•�'7��
a. R NOW
t�.i xq��� } �+d {�' , i .;,ram •l�° iI w .rr� k'�4 ��►• �'�i;�s+�Y*'� � F -� - � ,I
- 't#iwi`y�lgrti�I'1`.-"el,. ,�'�iS•w. .f1'�...s� �A�6- a ,y LRi+'�.E. `.+`i�S_ �..aE.ex.. �":i!.°:N�9•a14
A., F� - - +a - 't"Tr -ssy, -�-�,,•.. •T ris 4.eim, � L
e '� t-�[`�' �.r:g^� � � ���tg�t� k'� j �ji�����. o�� b �k� �}!e ��•#�����q 4'fiari'.I'�4%;'as� �,=�'� yam', �• � � �'
�> ' � a�'S ..:'.''r «��; t ,� �°�"�Y�' �i ii: � +'�.' �'. �t Sj��! �e�t .l;y'���,i t ��, 2 � ��'�'h � r � ��� "r�i• -
��
tfj�'l�i � ' 4'a�gi� 1 � } " F•' 4ii°F��; r � � i y �Y', o , km_ t § E ,: � �3 ?. �.
1ai.� ` '1 '3 a• i,r t�
I�' a.wi'� ,� ` N; � t• e •i ji.� V t:. � i i �t 1.i'-,� 's'" '7 � {
N�,AO ,' i0?��-�? F i5, ae=z1�� .edit_=9` }+., i� 3 ff , e
Y i�?•atf,76 iU x=�:' <Y�fa#�#{jl!Jg g�?'�� �jO ik r1",' •�,,.>•�� F'Sw� �r yr � y '. 1'. e'
�'! 1 t.°�'�Qa Mis
,l:„"', 1 A•w' 'ii'' 1Fg.. '' --� 3, r� a i i7.;/ c' �.„}Lf.
AMA
JI
,�• s FSar �
t 5�+,��.>R '+t� �a -� ��F•f� .n ., A r :�,��.;,;,r`�itjrfira- _. ,
t, + i 6 �s it • !"k J n Y rs►'i �!t i"�+���, jti Y f �i� y f <r �''
� • � �� Y. ��, `$1� � �, W ��� ��-�'�'"9�.rli" �� �-. �� ''fir s'� �� � ;ii�g� � 5� �� S r -s-r d, � • ��' - -
(�S •.► ir'� a lf�.r "�i. ;a; s: ••1•• .,a t t
t4 ,z..�'.. , e-. Y ,tom', y 3�f as°,j;• s,;
j:4 vre x'r ' ,"., ' y i ,�� !p�" k-i` ly►►-t;t'� d -�•'� ar. �1 F .fit �,�a '� � t;�gy}.�i`�
j rx��.6:i"' � r j�'1 ���� �iY s�F YS��=' I��� !-� � f c� � �s t ��! " n �,�qF � M•�iu*� 1
` � 4
"you
-"ii „ � a, j � � .. y j� r i' • , �� t"\ii4� }
,
all
f sk't"1: �ii r �i ti� l $ * - ,11L.• .t t' \ �', RR fi, (Ai a-
>F
kN212W—'s-r.t . r f�k' w .,r'! r r'. .,. •ir eS ti 't t.t. ?:, ._ }it -
KIL "','

AMENDMENT TO SECTION (D). APPLICATION AND HANDLING EQUIPMENT
(NOT INCLUDING IRRIGATION)
Waste application equipment has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan. It is the responsibility of the certified operator
in charge to calibrate their equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's design and
recommendations. Adjustments will need to be made based on animal waste analysis
reports and operator decisions affecting commercial fertilizers.
C�
Name of Certified Operator: G GJ �� -� e C
Signature: LJ Date: —% Z - 2-
c% �'

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMI's to 11flidmize Odor Site Specific I'ractices�W
F.-innstead Swine ploductioll Of VVgelalive or wooded buffers;
:----(-Crcommendcd best managenlellt practices;
f 1(;ood jndglnCllt and C0111n1011 sense
Aninril body surfaces 0 Uirly manure -covered anillmis ❑ Dry floors
�l foul Sultlaces Wet malliric-Coveled flool's 6;1totted floats;
Waterers located overslaucd floors;
m' Feeders at high end of solid floors;
gape n1a111rre buildup flam floors;
Underfloor ventilation for drying
NEaluuc collection pits • Urine; ❑ Frequeitt Immure removal by flush, flit recharge,
• 11a1fial nliclabial deconywsilioll or scrape;
i U lerflum, vcIIt118(iuii
Ventilation cxlladISI mans V01,11He gases; maintenance;
Dust (X Fffficicnlairlllovenient
11IdUul. sllrlaces • DI1SI Waslmdown between grollp5 of animals;
❑ feed additives;
❑ Feeder covers;
❑ Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks Agimlion of"recycled lagoon ❑ flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Emend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
a11tl-sipholl Vertts
blush alleys Agitation during wastcwalcr Cf Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
canveyance
Pit recharge points a Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Extend recharge lilies to near bofloln of pits
liquid Mlile pits are filling with anti -siphon vents
Litt slations a Agifation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
ar junction boxes convey;lnce
Alv10r' `lovember 11, 1996, Cage 3

Source Cruse In,.., to Minimize Udor Site Specirc L'r•actices
Uid of drainpipes at 0 Agitation during wastewater Cl f.xtcnd discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces 0 Volatile gals emissions; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing;
• Agitation
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Mitlinnlrll agitation when pulllprng;
❑ Mechanical acralion;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler 0 l ligh hlcssurc agitation; ❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
lroz�.lcs0 Wind drill ❑ Minilmml rccolnnrcndcd aperalhlb Ilressairc;
Cl Pump nitake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump From second -stage lagoon .
Storage lank or basin 0
Parlial micrubial decomposition;
❑
Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface 0
Mixing while filling;
O
'Tank covers; .
•
Agilaliun when enrplying
❑
Basin surface mats ofsolids;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin sur{:,Ice 0
I'allial microbial decomposition;
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets underltcath liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
❑
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or siudge -•
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets .
Volatile gas cn>,.issions
ttd wash residual manure from spreader iflcr Use;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
Volatile gas emissions while
Cl
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 Irrs.;
surfaces
in layers for drying;
Sl)read tllill uniform rapid
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
Carcass decomposition
Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead annual disposal Carcass decomposition ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits ❑ Proper- location/construction of disposal pits
Incineralors a 111compiete combustion ❑ Secondary slack burners
ANIOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4

Soru-ce Cause BNIPS l0 Alildlrtize Odor Site Specific Practices
Slanding %vater around 9 Improlrer drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
lilcilitics + Microbial decomposition of rrway from facilities
organic matter
Marline tracked onto Poorly maintained access roads ay' I7arrn access road maintenance
public roads From rarity
lICCCss
Additinn:rl Inrormation :
Swine Mamnc Mana-emcnt : 11200 Rule/13MI, Packet
Swine Prodoctioll Farm Potenlial Odor Sources and RCIIICdiC5 ; E13AL Fact Shcet
Swine Production Facility Malmle Mallagenlenl: Pi( Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; EME 128-83
Swine Production Facility Manrnc Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Trealment ; E.BAE-129-83
Laeorm Design and Managemmil for Livestock Manure Treatnrcnl and Storage ; EilAE 103-83
Calibialion of Manure and Wastcw•aler Application tiquipmcnl ; EL3A11,Pact Slrccl
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings ; I'll1-33
11nviroannental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual
Options for Managing Odor ; a report I-roln the Swine Odor Task Force
Nuisance Concems ill Alilmal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PKIC1107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
AM' ovcmbcr- 11, 1996, Page 5
Available From :
NCSU, Comity I xtcnsion Carter
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAG
NCSU - 13AE
NCSU - BA1
NCSU - BA13
NCSU - Swine Extension
NC fork i'roduccrs Assoc
NCSU Agri Comm nricalions
Florida Cooperative Extension
r

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
tillurcc CuusL IIMI'y to Cn1Ylrlsl Insrcls Site specific I'ractires
-- - - - Liquid Systems � � �--
FILIJL GLIUCls Accumulation of solids 0 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove acclunulaled solids from
gutters as designed.
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids ut
discharge
1 .:dl;oogs ;,Ills HIS Crusied Solids (3 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minintizc the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 3030 of surlace.
liad;es:ive Vegetative • I)ecuying vCgelatioll Cl Maintain vegetative control along banks of
111 owlb lagoons and other impoundntents to prevent
accumulation ofdecaying vegetative matter
along watCr's Cdbe on inklwUIRIMCllt's perimeter.
- Dry Sysleuls
1 ccAL;I:. ---- • Fccdl Spillage l)csign, oPeNIC ulul maintain feed systems (c.g.,
hunkers and Irdlughs) to nlil►iinize thd: .
acculnllation of decaying wastage.
Ci Chan up spillage om a'routine basis (e.g., 7 - 11)
day interval during summer; 15-30 day intcrval
during winter).
I'Cedl tildHatte 0 ACCOHILIlatIOIIS dlf-feed MidlICS n Itelllll:e InOIShIrC accunmlilt i0JI wtllknl;lull --- ----- —
arrluud ilrlulcdiale perinlcler of Iced storage
areas by illsuling drliu;Ige away liorll wile
and/or providing atle(Inale colnainmegl (e.g.,
covered bin lilt brewer's grain and similar liigh
Imo' 'lure grain producls).
Inspect 10r till(] IClllove or bleak till accunullaled
solids in IIIICr slrips aronndl Iced stol:ll'C as
needed(.
AN11C - I•luvelllbd:r 11. 1996, Page

Sa,nree Cause BMI's to Coulrol Insects -- - Site Specific Prarticcs -
Aui+nal l loldiug Areas Accuntttlations of animal wastes 0 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste .
accumulates and disturbance by attintals is
minimal.
O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulaled solids as
needed).
D1y h1artnre I landliny ACCnninlalion5 of anitunl wastes Cl Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
S} �teu�s day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
C] Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as neelled.
For luelre Iltlunumicut contact Ille Cool)Crative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Italcigis, NC, 27695-7613.
ANIW - ether 11, 1990, Page 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check- which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water. V
Rendering at a rendering plant Iicensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
J Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. fWritzen approval of the State Vverinarian must be
attached)
I
r, � ,• � roc ��,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: LEWIS CRABTREE - LEWIS CRABTREE FARM
DATE: t2-17-97
n Contact.the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality - Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] if
the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pin. If the
problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina Department
of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management - Raleigh
at I-800-662-7956 or [phone]. Provide the following information:
FACILITY NAME: LEWIS CRABTREE FARM-LEWIS CRABTREE
LOCATION: 3415 NC 86 N , III1I.S110R000II, 27278
REGISTRATION/PER.MIT # : 68-9
n If there is danger to Duman life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 or the
. ORANGE County Sheriff's Department at -
n Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby
irrigation fields if possible. See next page for additional action items.
n Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off -site damage (list
the names and phone numbers of three below).
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
1
i3i �LNti
�`` 3 - 3(1 !
2
n E R s� .a ►� 5 r tiu+� r c�aalL
- ,Z sir 1
3
' !, ► i c , Z `u
3
n Contact the ORANGE Soil and Water Conservation District at (919-732-8181
Ext.2750.
n Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this
specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist
who has design approval such as the Area Engineer.
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
Tommy Burchette, CET
336 - 679- 4863
Daphne Cartner, EIT
336 - 771 - 4600
Angela,Jessup, CE (Area It Engineer)
704 - 637 -2400

The following are possible situations and corresponding action items that may be taken to
stop the release of wastes. Not all items are applicable to every farm.
1) Lagoon or waste storage pond overflow - actions include:
a Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
b Stop all flows td the lagoon/waste storage pond immediately.
c Call a pumping contractor.
d Make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon/waste storage pond.
e Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
1I) Runoff from waste application field - actions include:
a Immediately stop waste application.
b Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred,
111) Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers - actions include:
a Stop recycle pumps.
b Stop irrigation pump.
c Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
IV) Leakage from flush systems, Houses, solid separators - actions include:
a Stop recycle pump.
b Stop irrigation pump.
c Make sure no siphon occurs.
d Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
V) Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon or waste storage pond. Often this is
seepage as opposed to flowing leaks - possible action items:
a Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all
seepage.
b If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals , fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and
lagoon/waste storage pond bottom as soon as possible.
2

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 30, 19!
Lewis Crabtree
Lewis Crabtree Farm
3415 NC 86 N
Hillsborough NC 27278
e��
NCDENR
r RLEIGH i?cGfQ1l L OF,'
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number�0-9
Oran ge,County�
Dear Lewis Crabtree:
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI,IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLURi, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
x
ZV,_ Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality ,
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 1, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Lewis Crabtree
Lewis Crabtree Farm
3415NC86N
Hillsborough NC 27278
Farm Number:V68 -.9�
Dear Lewis Crabtree:
1kF!W'A
17 0 0
A&4;1 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RF_50URCE5
You are hereby notified that Lewis Crabtree Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215. IOC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone] extension 364 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerel .,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

f la PL4
_ AErDivision'of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit fir-R'outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Dale of Visit: 1n b3 Time: =3b Printed on: 7/21/2000
FFacility Number �.
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: i C C R e County, ) R-A"i'G Z.
f.s,i................1................................................................................................................................. .
OwnerName................................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:........................................................ Phone No:
...........................................................
FlailingAddress: ............................... :............ ....... .................................................................. ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ...... LK-0. s........5. 44....................................... integrator :.......... .............................................. I ....... ......................
Certified Operator: ................................................. . ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Vocation of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ���� ��� Longitude 0
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons "p ❑Subsurface Drains Present In Lagmbn Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge oril;inatcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
J
h. ]f discharge is ohserved. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: .............................................................................................
Freehoard (inches):
5100 r''-FS aOLV
Structure 5
[]Yes P_�o
❑ Yes Pll�o
❑ Yes ,B No
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ Yes
E3"No
❑ Yes
B- o
❑ Yes EKo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: L% — 9* � Date of Inspection !ti [ Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes g(No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? El Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes /El/No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes s"O
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type qt�7F S C_u C_ C-`,? F*m t}-4—
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes JONo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ,Ef'No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes 4:fN0
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �Wo
5i 3/��
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Wast Mt nagement Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) y ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil samples reports) ElO Yes ' No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes �No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes J3 O
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes P_<o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes'p-No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes /;Iko
fo yiol'atior s:or• deficiencies •were noted• during this:visit} -'Y;oj witi•receiye,W rurfte • ,
comes ottidence, aN ' f this visit.: ' • ' . • . • ............. ..... ' .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
A,
11CFE-fDX PdM a w7- '� r h -JZ LJA tda4�r66 5wcP J'E R.i tr j CL o S UP,9
GA AS Tb "asF_ W #3T-3 TOEA. CAQZ sows . Vcr,.
IReviewerlinspector Name 1� � �f`. �t1„I-Qr S 7 l — L[76-6 I
Reviewer/inspectorSignature: � �,,���, j'� ,�,,`� Date: 5/00 1

Facilllty Number: 6 Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge AL/or below ❑ Yes J2fNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes ONO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 0&0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes FZr No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes EJ'No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes 1�10

s Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Dtv�s[on of Soil and Water Conservation Inspection,
..Compliance
'
0 Division of Water Quality' - Compliance Inspection
r f £
Agenty
0 Other - Operation
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-62 of DAVQ inspection O Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
r
Facility Nutuher �{ Date of Inspection
Time of inspection 00124 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ❑ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farrn Name. ..... .............. County: / )................ .......... .........................
Owner Name ........................................,.......................................... Phone No: ,.
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................'Title:.................... Phone No: .................................................
'vi.[ilinL Address:
f'
CJnsite Renresentatiyc: �-- €c.'e S l� �L+ Inte rotor:
:f !
Certified Operator:.. ..... Operator Certification Number :..........................................
Location of Farm:
AL
Latitude a =° E---1- Longitude =• =, 0•:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑Nan -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Ej Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish' Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I F I ❑ Subsurface Drains Preserit ❑ La,-oon Area.ICI-Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Str•eani Impacts,
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge ori-inalcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
ay..If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes �No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes � No
?. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection &Treatment
I
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway El Yes No
Structure 1 Struc[urc 2 Structure. 3 Svmu ture 4 Structure 5 Structure
Identifier:
Freehoard(inches): ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, F1 Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/21/99 Continued on back

Facijity Number: Date ut, ]ntittectiou
t 6. .Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? []Yes L No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancehmprovement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancehmprovement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
11. is there evidence of over application?. ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12, Crop type.,4t. S 6-1, 1p , - --
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
l6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily availahlc?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps. etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (icl irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in Charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
00 discharge, freeboard problems, over application}
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector Lail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: too yi... . ris:oir deficie c es r��ere notetj iluritig • his*visit:.Yoi .will .. Oive iio furth+g� '
comes 6nence: abatat: this visit. ... .. ' . ..: ... - : .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendaiions"or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as ]necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name
r rt
❑ Yes ? No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes CXNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes [Z'No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes [I(No
❑ Yes (�No
❑ Yes [jNo
❑ Yes [7 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: C7
3/23/99

F461ity Number,(Datc of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑�No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes [ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submersed fill pipe or a pennanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑ No
Additional omments an orDrawings:
i
3/23/99

* . -_i
r
S ' 0 Division of Sail and Water` Conservation Qperation Review 4
Division of Soil and }WaterF=Conservaitttnn - Compliance IinsRectton'
Division of Water Quality - COR1plE&nCe YnSlleCtiOn
1i F�
i Other A enC - 0 CC$t7QlA ReVAeWi
-�. � y'. .I•t.� € , �
Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ ins ection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection S 2
�J Time of Inspection .3y 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ,/ J Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name L.�� ��, �. .8'�'f: EE A►C� County: 6�,-.. ......................
........... ........................................................................ �.....
Owner Name: .............................................. Phone No:
FacilityContact: ............. ...................... ..... --... .............................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
...................................................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: , tiv�% %S' ....C.%S A% „► Integratnr:.. t pSj , cc'JT
..........................................................
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
............................................................. ...................... ........................ ................
Latitude Longitude �•�'��°
Design Current t Design Current Design Current
ti Swine CapacityPo ulation .Poultry',' ; Ca `acit ,Po'" latton Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder El Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish t p $Z ❑ Non -Lay er ; ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean "
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Btt , > , iE, Total Design' Capacity
❑ Gilts
�i
Boars , �: �Total-SSLW
�Nu][tlber ofELagoons
r❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
'-
❑
Ho.lding Ponds /Solid Traps ' 't , ` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONO
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance anan-made? ❑Yes KNo
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes V"No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2�10
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes WIo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? []Yes dNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ;2�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............P.1.(........................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes Z No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: C& — flute of Inspection S zs
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ZNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes V(No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 2(N0
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
U(No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
ZNo
12.
Crop type rG Z�
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in t e Certified An nal Waste Management an (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
ZNo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONO
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
&NO
c) This Facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ET�No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
P fqo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Feno
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ,2rNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(le/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ;? Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Wyes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Z No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ONO
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 0 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes jffNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 'ONO
25.- Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes .moo
viol'affgris:or &fleiendO NvOe jWed- d0•rrtng • bis'visit; • Y:o4 '*fl1-reet;iye lid further. ,
' iCories 6fideltiCe. about. th"' Visit.. . . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . . . '
Comments (r'efer toiquest►on #) tExplatn any YESlanswers and/or any recommendations or anytother comments `, bs
j - s { , E 4 ,- , - - 1
F i 4 Lei �
Use draw,ngs of fa6Iq 6,better explain sttuattons use'addi" ' ' I ' s as
i ..� . i !v t. z ,. _ < <l. -0'. �.�$ !{.h .,: l i ',a.l
CB,'� r,�EurE Sa fl..Es a avics�D Ljrrod,~^f 60 DAYS
.,o� AP�c,��a�rr �r. � y rz� pA-+,s
APIri, rt 6 (rF_At -s'AJouj,o of oArE At,G WASrE ACFUc.A',,'orr /ZE.co4ps .
A P o r S7aF y � S rN ? LA W
Wavtry m4F41me" To c.ATQ_C Ac,cC-_ss T-a Coei- !!
-; i 1'^"Vi"i,
Reviewer/Inspector Name t. 'r�J hi^L,.4 /��/■1.UA�,s .' , ' f t�f C Rom. rt
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. It Date: z $� S+9'
3/23/99

•
CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Dater
Completed Certification Form; Date:
^� Waste Utilization Plan; Date: i z/zq S�
Amount of plant available nitrogen pr duced/used annually (z3zz/91()S-S7- Ibs)
Dominant soil series: fiv 31
Crops to be grown: 1- ,�c,)
Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= )
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1/93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1197)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1197)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97)
Type of irrigation: Traveling Gun Solid -Set Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description): WAGCrj
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 9/1 /96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1/96) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2196 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1 /96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21/96)
REQU ED RECORDS effective 9/1 /96
Waste application records (IRR 1&2)
'° q"? Annual soil sample reports for 1999
(Cu index: — 3G )
(Zn index:
PERMITTED FACILITIES
General Permit & COC on site
weekly lagoon level records
1 , l • I
_Z Waste analysis -date last taken ►�1za I�6 'K R-0 00 CakT—
�r f� PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #1
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #2 _

FACILITY NUMBER 6 - �� REVIEWER: -7.kt.....+.
FARM NAME: Z,"rs DATE: sI
TYPE
F NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON - PAN=
POND - PAN
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGNIVOLUME CALCULATIONS:
Top of dike elevation:
Elev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation:
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume ft3
Temporary storage volume ft3
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi).
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr)
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design.
Design
Design
Design
WUP - Days of temporary storage:
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
1' 25 yr.124 hr. storm in.
2"d 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
Structural freeboard in.
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Exceeds required volume?
Exceeds required volume?
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

� � N
(] Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Mivision of Water Quality
jVRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up or DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspectionto
Facility Number
Time of Inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
©Registered 0 Certified ©Applied for Permit [3Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:..
......................
Farm Name:...... 4,.k.j.I.5....... G� C;�.t.!� ... '1. ............................ County:........ .r-t' � �r..................... ....1...l................
Owner Name:.......: � 5.........�.rY �( .. h��,............................................. Phone No:......0 � Da .. 132........ 0 g T.............
.............. ..........
L e uJ { C►vo1110-
Facility.Contact:....................f..�........v-..............�..1." `-::�..... Title:..........................................................----- Phonnee N:.��
Mailing Address:........�..�. .......N.1�..........�.L.. �D�......................... ..........................
..............................................................................................
Onsite Representative:.....i....� ..5..... .✓.. fib' . . ....................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator :........... Ui L?i..�... C! �< '9. !'................................ Operator Certification Number .........................................
........... ........
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude [�• EI ° = 61
Longitude =• b'1 ,
46
Design '� Currents , Design
.:.
Swine Capacity Population, Poultry Capacity
Current ' Destgn Current
Population, Cattle ", `~ Capacity wPopulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
y
❑Dairy
[ErFeeder to Finish
Q
;'r ❑ Non -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
_ �``
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
'
❑ Farrow to Finish
$
TOtal Desl n Ca aClt Y..
Gilts
❑ it
❑ Boars
:�
Total SSLW .
�. .gym
.. .._.. _ __ _. ___.
_ ...
.._.._.
Number ofx: ooYfs / Haldin Pi) ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
g�
❑Lagoon Area
❑Spray Feld Area
G
❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
q g Yk
;: nE
x
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
„„..,,�
01-10
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Elgo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
(�lo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
O' i�o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
{fib
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Ko
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
©-No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
(moo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
El7. Yes
,(.]-,_t-No
tNo
7/25/97

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes EKO
Structures (Lapoons.11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) iv %
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier: ............!J..!....... ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):.................................................................
....... ................................... .................................... ............. ....................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes O- o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ETIZo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Blgo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? [\f/Ar ❑ Yes EFNO
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ N6'
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �. . '.............................................................................:.......................................................I................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes B116'
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[j<
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement? '
❑ Yes
E]-<
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
010
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
O"Yes
Endo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
L! — o
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
OYes
❑ No
For
Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
RKo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[[340
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
[9110
No.vi6lationsor. d'iciencies.were inoted,during this:visit. You:will i-eceive.nti-furth:er
:. eprrespi)WehO about this' visit :: :. : .
7i2 . 'YL wade GyLa� S F3 (N) C.Bv-P.c PAW AV-u-o 60 d a,�d .
7Wa 1Z ""w-a 513
�c kz'�P- r 60 W5L ' D91- 14
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: P �C& , M ; ;'Mwj, � Date: V 0--A-y- l . ) q� 0

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 6 % - 5
Farm Name: L",`s cArs rr_.e F_ ��►.
On -Site Representative: c z.A 9 rr-Ev
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: _ o U � r
Dateiof site visit: S z S- 9y
Date of most recent WUP: z
Operation is flagged fora wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F9 F2 F3 F4
—zoperation not required to secure WA
determination at this time sed on
exemption E1 E2 E3
Annual farm PAN deficit: / "7 33 pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stat+oriary'-gun--s�stem wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
�� w A 6 a
ART I. WA De ation Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.) -
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2ID3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
Z475% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART ll. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number 6b -�
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
J.
3
5 J
`7
► • g
ta-
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. if pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

3
tine O Comulaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection
Facility Number
0 Registered © Certiiied n Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
FarmName:.............................................................................
Follow-u p of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time oi' Inspection V= 24 hr. (lth:mm)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
County:.0..gAU--.-t.....................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ......................................... Phone No:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title..................,.............................................. Phone No:.......................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ...............................................,..................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ....... A ............ �.................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:................... ......................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 L4 Longitude =• 9 46
Design,.: Current
Design .',;°CDesign Current urrent
S v3une. Capacity Population Poultry Capacity I'opulatibQ Cattle, Capacity Poppla ion,
to Feederceder
*E1ean
to Finish77
arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Pnnds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
s
=: � k ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
uenerat
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
'of
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
�No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
ElYes
I
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
PNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
P�No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
VNO
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
El Yes
T
{No
maintenance/improvement?
/
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25/97
Continued on beck

I Facility Number.• --
No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑Yes
Structures a oons oldin Ponds Flush Pits etc.)IT S jq
/
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure G
Identifier:.........................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft):...........................................................................................................................................................................................................1
.....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
JLJ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
K40
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
V
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
[ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff en ring waters of the State, notify DWQ)
�. .�I5. Crop type ...........
......
ib. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes�o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ANo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
0
owl
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
9�0
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�10
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
I o
For,Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
j
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
FN'o
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑.Yes
10 No .
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
XNO
0 No violations or deficiencies. were ntited during this: visit.-1.ou:will receive` rto further-
: correspQndebn e.about- hisn.vis f.: :.::: :::.::.:. .. ....: '.: :
<�, TO V Q�
V A) 0 b- fL 5ti,
(� N &" E-1a TD C40-AJ
F-0 D CJ_J 7-
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
lReviewer/Inspector Signatu
Date:

E] DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
[� DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine -O Complaint -O Follow-uE of DWQ inspection O Follow-u '"of DSWC review - O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin traction of hours
Farm .Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified [' Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
© Not Operational Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
FarmName: ............................................................................................................................... County:................................................,....................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:..............................................,.........................................
Facility Contact: ..................... . Title:.................. . Phone No:
MailingAddress: .................................................................................................................,.........................................,..---...................................... ..........................
Onsite Re resentative..1-camS.................................,,,, Integrator: ....................... . . Certified Operator: ................. .. Operator Certification Number:......
Location of Farm:
c
Latitude r_�• �� �" Longitude �• �' �«
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance mien -made'? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in dal/rnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require _ ❑Yes No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Fact ity Number: ec-
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a ce %ed operator in responsible charge?
T) .5 s k .w - It,�,k Inr. h
8. Are.there lagoons or storage ponds on r`e which need to be prXrly closed? .
Structures d,agoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes Mo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes J;�'No
❑ Yes No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
�Mo
It.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
KNo
Waste Annlicajion
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
XNO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
ESGv q ..................................................................................................................................................................
15.
Crop type.......................�....�.....�!��.. .
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
ONo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
/No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
ElYes
9 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Y;?(No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
O"No
For Certified Facilities Onl r
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
#Ctnim�tsf (i efec ��estr'oni'#):�'Explau► sny�YlaS answers and/aryrecvm�iient�aha�,sor yr:athei•,¢com� is � " ,'' �
�L1srawi��fa:ci�lity�be�ttere�larn�situatlo�(use;add�tiun�pagess ry):. >,,�. ,. _.,3,� ... � "Y
E tGa�
I� A 6-- � � -�--
Clfhl• d r Cer ; LUVP— 1 OP-4 heed be- eel �
)9A) S
Reviewer/Inspector Name a ,� 4 • : �, .',,to �•°°
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: W&kLAF 6 4 Date: ) 3
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quatib Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Lewis Crabtree
Lewis Crabtree Farm
3415NC86N
Hillsboro 2
1DEiHNF;Z
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
,�Ct� ; _�.?� Lewis Crabtree Farm
Facility Number 68--9
DENWR RnI SIGH Orange County
REGIONAi nri irc
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. PIease be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at {919}733-0026.
Sincerely, y�
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, �Ay� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27625-0535 �f An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 100% post -consumer paper

1
1
Scat o .North Carolina
De ent of Environment,
He th nd Natural Resources
Divis f Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
EDF=HNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 14, 1997
Mr. Lewis Crabtree
3415 NC 86 North
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 68-9; 68-42
Lewis Crabtree Farm
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
On July 10, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from. the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the animal operations were not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State. As a result of
the inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
I would like to remind you of the requirement to have an approved
Animal Waste Management Plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must
be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or
assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely
dy G rrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Brent Bogue, Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO-
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
P.O. Box 29535, 1 owl
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 NVfcAn Equal Opportunity/Affirrnative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

1914outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other �
Facility Number Date of Inspection 'l 0m
Time of Inspection l2: 24 br. (bh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status* [Kegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted I or Ins ection includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operation�all,,�, Date Last Operated: „»»».._...»._.„„...,.._.„»._._._.,,/.r._...„.„...,..»._.„„_»_............_...,.....» ..»
Farm Name: Lta�g C'r�'�?�'.��'�_..._...... County:....�.1 ...�„.„_ _..........._.._..»........
Land Owner Name: ,.,Y����' .. Phone No: (�h
Facility Conctact: _��„? 5.,.u:?r I....„..`.��.. Title: ..„»».»... Phone No:...5`':.r.....»_..............
Mailing Address: ,,,,3 t ..._ ��... ►�.._._ l� aa. �.„.1` L Z`l Z � . _ _ .»...... ..........»» _. „.. ...»
Onsite Representative:\g . , Integrator: „.„„» „r.„„...__
Certified Operator:,,.!.1.�r!rD-:._...__.. Operator Certification Number: _..........».r.....�....._ ..
Location of Farm: �v� a Sb c.. CVWre'� P-&
Latitude 0 6 " Longitude e & �K
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
a
;-sign' rCtirrent s e e '< k r �'DeSign u6 ACnrrent <� r Ap�?JUesign Current
Swine��aCa .aci :'Po xulatioa ultryCs aci .'Pa lation •4. C$ttle K: .� C : aci P uletion'
❑ Wean to Feeder HNon-Layer
r`` ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish iry
Farrow _LQ Weans
Farrow to Feeder ,Total Design Cspse3ty N y a�;�- 4
Farrow to Finish
❑ Ocher
dumber of Lagoons !Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
�+3- r 3 t't'">"
y<_ ❑Lag on Area ❑ Spray Field Areajy� w k
venera� 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M4
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑<o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 �fo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [i} &
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? &� W
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 'No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Bl�o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes nr<o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 2' o
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Y
Facility Number ..-
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes L}d No
{ 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes [9-o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes �10
Structures fLagopls and/or Holding Ponds}
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Free!Kwd (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
I3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
walls AROligatign
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
[<o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ' .. ._....._ .....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? u
❑ Yes
Q`Ko
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ffll�o
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
(moo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
M-Iqo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Fagilil
❑ Yes
GWO
QuIv
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): ,Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any'other comments.
Use drawings'of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as'nece'ssary):
urjax
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
Date: '[ Q
4/30/97

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation
s
[DWQ�Animal Feedlot Operatiojn Site Inspection
tontine 0 Comelaint O Follow --up of DWQ inspection O Fallow -up of DSW-C review Q Other
Date of Inspection "1 tt, 4
Facility Number
Time of Inspection IZ: 24 hr. (bb:mm)
T t 1 Ti i r— ti f h
00 me (n c on o ours
Farm Status* Eeglstered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted Lor Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: _._......� ..._.._..� ................ _. __.....
Farm Name: L-'@-�,.1�g �..r�. » �.�...�!r _.... County: �jYY!� ..........._ ..w .__
Land Owner Name: LB�g �r _ Phone No: .!a�.:.. .... . _..
Facility Conctact: Title: ��'..? .`...�_......... Phone No:.. S ` . ..... ...................
Mailing Address:- 3t{ 1� �S, �QOt" ►J L 2�2" _ .�
Onsite Representative:' k2kS S CIntegrator: �............._ ..._.. �. _..._� .._ ......._ .._.
Certified Operator: �.�!.. .�1 �r..._.....r.�.,....._,..,.., Operator Certification Number :................_.......—... _...
Location of Farm: �j�„jy �(o t� �' 1 1�S�jniCtl�Gt,.. ate- t,_VAywA- Ckure_sa, QA
Latitude C7a6 u Longitude • ' Du
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Designoe
Current ;Gbrrent Design Current': `
1Poultry � Ca aci "` o "lotion Cattle a aci Po �ul tion'
E0 Layer [I Dairy
EJN�on-Laxer 'g,; on -Da'
x' -h ukiai'p° '�"''»„tea', �' - 'a;.S M vk .,.*f•�?¢��7r t r -��ry,.i '4'
Total Deg Capacity's r
F
W
N„ a V
§'Toi; SSL
n
.�.._ Ca ecE Po" tilation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow t Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow t is
` ❑Other
�1,Iumber of Ltigoons'1 Ho1`din Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present'
g
�: ❑ Lagoon Area - ❑ S ra? Field Area ,
3 - r' v N
�LiaLtiaL
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [I Yes i+�'�10
2. 1s any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [I Yes M-l�o
• Discharge originated at-, ❑Lagoon ❑Spray field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [9,7�0
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (]f yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? *
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) Dyes ,[�l�o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes l�'N°
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ��►- � ❑Yes ®'FIo
4skcYA-+'— 1Vt p��y
S. Does any part of the waste management system {other than lagooasTholding ponds} require v ❑Yes a�K°
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on beck

a Facility Number: _ 2
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons a for Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft):. Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes .[;....w�o
❑ Yes ty�lvo
❑ Yes ,&<o
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental.threst, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
3yaste Appheatloo a A
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type __ ._.. »_....r......... _. _......_....._........ _....._... _ ......_......._....�_ _...._ ......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2I. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified F,g 'lei itiec [1, ly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0Ko'
❑ Yes CB>S
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #}: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.., —
Use drawings of facility to bettei.explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):. :..
- a VV-QVe . etrnre'li 6j - n % - b - g '�t
o
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: JCZA
Date:
CC. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Kakility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

'State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary. IDEEHNF;Z
A. Preston Howard, Jr., RE„ Director
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 14, 1997
Mr. Kenneth Kirk
6108 Orange Grove Road
Hillsborough, North Carolina .27278
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 68-11
Kirk Dairy
Orange County
Dear Mr. Kirk:
On July 8, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the cattle operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
holding ponds had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
I would like to remind you of the requirement to have an approved
Animal Waste Management Plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must
be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or
assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely,
a
%Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Brent Bogue, Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
P.O, Box 29535, �� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 N�� An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmatfve Action Employer
Telephone [phone] WPM 50% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Lewis Crabtree
Lewis Crabtree Farm
3415 NC 86 N
Hillsborough NC 27278
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Lewis Crabtree Farm
Facility ID#: 68-9
Orange County
110-M. _3z 1'KIMT-•Z—
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
tali Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerel ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1- 7687 �C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 _ h.. 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
MOOM
�EHNF�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 20, 1995
Mr. Lewis Crabtree
3415 NC 86 North
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Swine Operation
Facility No. 68-9
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
On November 15, 1995, Ms. Vanessa Manuel from this office conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's
efforts to determine potential problems associated with waste disposal systems.
Ms. Manuel's site visit determined that wastewater from this facility was not
discharging to the surface waters of the State. No manmade ditches, or other
prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) were
observed. While the presence of a pipe was observed from the pit of the hog
house to a fresh water pond, no waste discharge was observed emanating from the
pipe. As informed to us by Mr. Douglas Crabtree, the pipe was installed with the
building of the hog house, but has never been used and is now permanently sealed
from the inside.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a responsibility of
all animal facility operators. The Division of Environmental Management is
required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural
resources of the State.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are
required to have an approved animal waste management plan by December 1997. This
plan must be Certified by a designated technical specialist -or a professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you
have any questions regarding your inspection please call Ms. Manuel at 919-571-
4700.
sincerely, i
"Zb(
,by Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. pg-9
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATI01JS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: // /t 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: DWI S �'4�.�' ._ ( 73Z
Mailing Address: 3yl_1 IU(', Rlo___jQy-d
County: L2rahAe
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative. [y k-� 1,✓1- �rc� �,�y� Phone : 9lq �3a -393�
Physical Address/Location.
Type of Operation: Swine K Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ .Z60 P'Ej, n� tuber of Animals on Site: /`ID
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' " Longitude:
Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 F of + 25 year 24 hour
storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No j .
Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches Op
Was any seepage observed from the �n(s)? Yes or ' No
Was any erosion observed? Yes or 0
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop (s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Feet from Dwellings? e' s r No
100 Feet from Wells? &or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or Vo
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 6 g
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes oro
If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
A-1 -1 ^____ --- 1--
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
g#6'71j
-
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.