680004_PERMIT FILE_20171231

jga�A DLAJ
Animal Was�e Storage: Pond cans Lagoon Closure Repoft FOI-111
(Please type or print all information Tat does nut require n sigmlture}
General Information:
Name of Farm: ,1 OILL Facility No:��)__-
Owner(s) Name: c;t. 't.AS C 17 BT R LE
Nlailinv Address: ill :7T 1 Phone No: '132 - .3- 1 3 Z
t l_5(�GRGLI(3t� L 7 " County: O RAN6C_
Q eration Descri tion (remaining animals only);_
Tease check this box if there will be no animals on this farm .i(ter lagoon closure. It there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closum please provide the followinginformation on the anirrrils that wiill remain.
Q12eration Description:
Type of Swine NO. of Anbrrals Tipe of Poulin- MO. of "1 rrimals T_rpe of Carrie
wean to Feeder _ -DLaver � Dairy
�:) Feeder to Finish D Pullets _ �:j Beef
MO. of AnirnaLs
D Farrow to wean
Tarrow to Feeder O
I Farrow to Finish orlrer Tale, of L it•cvr),7 •:__ rVr ulmr of'Animals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals grca(cr Ilian the 21-1 .0217 tltresliold? Yes CJ No C4—"
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this ortc closes? Yes ❑ No L�
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:�
(Name)._ _ 11). i 9of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division
of Water Quality's L T 1A Regional Office (see map on back)
was contacted on (date) for notification of the pending closure of this po d or lagoon.
This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start of closure which beaan'on zG o� (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. i have followed a closure plan which meets
all NRCS specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21
of the North Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lnu'oon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature:_
{
Date: < s 2' P, c" '1—
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical
Guide Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and vet-ified by me: all waste
liquids and sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate. all input pipes have been
removed, all slopes have been stabilized as necessary. and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
'7
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):.P�e04 y
Affiliation: z WIM ,P�►JG�= <-,a � _OAre� 1 �nrSPlZyArraly _ ��rSiRrcr_
Address (Agency):_ 3)t -D 1ReV'eJU Rfl_ )4tLL660QD( Gµ_Aq29bPhone No.:�91�
Signature
ate: 32" ,2 7 —v 2-"
Return to owing comp etton of anima water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Water Quality Section
' Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0-3-
PLC - I %-Iiv ?. 1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
Dear Douglas Crabtree:
A��
NCDE F-
NORTH CAF
ENVIRONMENT
February 20, 2002
4RT.MENT OF
41_0E5OURCE5 t /
1 . ` FEB
DERIVE
zz�
Subject: Removal of Registration
Walnut Hill Farms
Facility Number 68-4
Orange County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge'of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant at
[phone] ext. 571or Steve Lewis [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
hregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] . Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 3, 1999 .
Mr. Douglas Crabtree
4211 Saint Mary's Road
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Walnut Hill Farm
Facility #68-4
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
On May 25, 1999, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr. Hunt's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters
of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other
prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a result of
the inspection, the following deficiency was observed:
A condition of the Certified Waste management plan requires
annual soil tests to be performed for each field to receive
animal waste applications. No soil samples have been
collected for the waste application fields at this
operation. Also, waste samples are required within sixty
(60) days of application of wastes to the fields. Wastes
are typically applied throughout the year for this type of
waste system and thus a minimum of three samples will be
required annually if indeed wastes are applied throughout
the year. Keep in mind that wastes must be applied to
actively growing crops.
9800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEION, NORTH CAROLINA 27600
PHONE 919-E71.4700 FAX [phone]- ~�
AM EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCL$O/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPS

i. ?
Mr.Douglas Crabtree
Page Two
Please respond to this notification within 30 days of
receipt. You should include in your response the actions
that you will take to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
Y, , 2, LQ
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Mr. Brent Bogue, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

• NORTH &OLiNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 3, 1999
Mr. Douglas Crabtree
4211 Saint Mary's Road
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Notice of.Deficiency
Walnut Hill Farm
Facility #68-4
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
On May 25, 1999, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr. Hunt's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters
of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other
prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a result of
the inspection, the following deficiency was observed:
A condition of the Certified Waste management plan requires
annual soil tests to be performed for each field to receive
animal waste applications. No soil samples have been
collected for the waste application fields at this
operation. Also, waste samples are required within sixty
(60) days of application of wastes to the fields. Wastes
are typically applied throughout the year for this type of
waste system and thus a minimum of three samples will be
required annually if indeed wastes are applied throughout
the year. Keep in mind that wastes must be applied to
actively growing crops.
8800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITA 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]te
AN [EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 809E RICYCLRO/10% POST-CON#UMER PAPER

•
Mr.Douglas Crabtree
Page Two
Please respond to this notification within 30 days of
receipt. You should include in your response the actions
that you will take to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. if you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
x" 2)",Q
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Mr. Brent Bogue, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

Z661 9 ~ AMA
-
'-'-----'-----
. - .

Orange Sail and Water Conservation District
306 Revere Road - P.Q. Box 8181
Hillsborough,.,NG 27278 • Phone: [phone] • Ext. 2750
November 24, 1997
Mr. Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DWQ
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
SUBJ: WALNUT HILL FARM
Facility #: 68-41
Orange County
Dear Mr. Tedder:
Mr. Douglas Crabtree contacted our office on November 13, 1997 concerning
the letter of Notice of Violation and notice of civil penalty he received
from DWQ. This letter dealt primarily with his swine operation at Walnut
Hill Farm, Facility ##68-004.
I spoke with Sue Homewood, DWQ, on November 14, 1997 and she indicated Mr.
Crabtree had not designated an "Operator in Charge" on his BEEF cattle farm
- Facility # 68-41. Mr. Crabtree has a pastured beef cattle operation.
There is no liquid waste system for the beef cattle farm. I have a note on
file dated April 22, 1997 saying that Mr. Crabtree called and spoke to
someone in Raleigh (I did not write down name of person) and was told "not
to worry about beef cattle with no liquid sludge."
In talking with Ms. Homewood on November 14, she indicated she had Mr.
Crabtree's "Request for Removal Confirmation" in her hand at that time.
Since Mr. Crabtree was confirmed to be removed from the registration list,
there is no need for an "Operator in Charge" designation for his beef
cattle operation. I hope this will clarify this particular issue.
Thank you for your consideration of this important matter. Please feel
free to call if you have questions.
Sinc��e��r��ely,,
AB��C- A-. 4_�4� M. Hughes
Soil Conservationist

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATQR 1 I.,CHARrE
j?E.STCrNATT0N FORM
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: (ag' County: fR 4
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address. 4 2
Cit7 / /�S�rouC _ State / Zip 2, 7,7/
Certilicate = Social Security T 01 'yz! Id A�
Work Phone — Horne Phone 73 Z - 3 2
Signature Date AV ,92
********************************f****************************
OY9NNER -PO Cry In < Cra �re e
Mailin-, Address_*'.// 'Sf mg to z s �a/ City
State A)G Zip 77,7 7? Telephoner—.- - 3s.3z
SignatureAO Date 91 2 Z 92
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO,
ENVIRONVIEVTAL 1•IANAGENlENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMTi 1ISTRaTNE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. - (: c
Having been assessed civil penalties totalit g (J_- UiI for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, _-- 7 _ , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of Z zf2-y' , 192-7
9
ro fir,
ticts�
I
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
a -7

Orange Sall and Water Conservation District
306 Revere Road • P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, IBC 27278 - Phone: [phone] • Ext. 2750
November 24, 1997
Mr. Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DWQ
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
SUBJ: WALNUT HILL FARM
Facility #: 68-004•
Orange County
Case #• OV 97-059
Dear Mr. Tedder:
Mr. Douglas Crabtree contacted our office on November 13, 1997 concerning
the letter of Notice of Violation and notice of civil penalty he received
from DWQ. He was very concerned about this issue and asked the Orange Soil
and Water Conservation District staff for assistance on clarification.
Mr. Crabtree operates a swine operation in Orange County. He has actively
been managing his animal operation according to our recommendations. He is
currently developing his waste manasgement plan. Mr. Crabtree attended the
first session of operator training and received his certification in late
1996.
Mr. Crabtree remembered receiving a letter this past spring reminding him
to register as "Operator in Charge." Upon receiving this letter, he called
our office and then called the Raleigh regional office to be certain he was
not already registered as "Operator in Charge." Mr. Crabtree called our
office later and I made a note of our conversation as follows: "On April
22, 1997, Doug called the Raleigh office; they said he was o.k., in system
as Marvin D. Crabtree." (Doug's first name is Marvin.)
On November 14, 1997, I spoke with Sue Homewood, DWQ, about Mr. Crabtree's
situation. She suggested I write a letter to clarify our position. I feel
this has been a simple, yet extreme case, of miscommunication. Mr.
Crabtree thought he had registered and signed all of the appropriate
paperwork through this process.

4
Mr. Steve Tedder Page 2 11/24/97
The Orange District staff feels it would be an injustice penalizing Mr.
Crabtree for a miscommunication. He has worked closely with the district
and the NC Cooperative Extension Service on his animal operation.
We sincerely hope this issue can be resolved without assessment of
penalities against Mr. Crabtree. Please feel free to contact our office if
you have questions. Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
Gail M. Hughes
Soil Conservationist
cc: Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, Div. Soil & Water

f , -y
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATOR IN CHARC=E,
DESMNATION FORM
ANIMAL WASTE 'NIA NA GENIENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: Co 6 ' -97 County: DR APJA E
OPERATOR IN CHARGE UQ )CA5 ("*)-_V-L,6+re2
Horne 'Mailing Address. In,9RV -S C71
City o ro State Zip__7� 7Y
Certificate 7(_ Social Security T 9 y )/ - ly - 1 f"g
Work Phone 1 Home Phone [phone]-
r
Signature 0f1', -cam-- Date 11 7
I
.e
Mailing, Address. 6z /I Sf /!)R/2J/i%dal City i//s ra
State_ c _ . Zip a7.77 Telephone? Z - 3Z
SignatureI��, �� T_ Date // 29„7
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
Dear Douglas Crabtree:
A 4 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND; NATURAL RESOURCES
J v
December 30, 1999
I Okq
C6 t�F
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 68-4F'
Orange Coun"� ty
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. 1RR1, 1RR2, DRY I, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
,lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July I I, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
Farm Number: 68 - 4
Dear Douglas Crabtree:
4IT
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Walnut Hill Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
c
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

ivision of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation '
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Atompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for VisitRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: ��'time: + o - t S Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not Operational Q Belo.v Threshold
0 Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Cj Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ......... .. L± ..0 gT :........ County ^� 6.....................................
......•
.....................................
w A`a d r u:LA— rFAQ-(- -
OwnerName:................................................................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ..."11tle:................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:............................................................
Onsite Representative:.. fl�. .�^.i '� .5.. . -. ........... Integrator: ....... ......................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.......f....7.Z.. ..............
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude " 6 cc
Design Current
Swine Cauacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po" ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag,-n Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact;
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Ficld ❑ Other
a. II'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes i-
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ElYes ,o
e. If dischan,c is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin'?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (1r yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0<0
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes�No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Slrncaure I Structure 2 Structure 3 StruClUrc 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ IJA............. .-............... -........... ....•................................. .................... I ........ ...... .I............
Freeboard (inches):
5100 �: [S Continued on back

+'Facility Number: A_ — q Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ONO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes'No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
pllio
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'?
❑ Yes
�Vo
Waste Application
eNo
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
111. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
ep",o
12. Crop type iC,c
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
j No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
2rNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ��yy fqqgg rj
ahao4sls
❑ Yes ❑"No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste & soil sat+n c reports)
�es/❑'No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[3'&o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
❑ Yes
J2140
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes
o
23. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes I0
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes eNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Af�No
�4•*Wtioris:ot• d'e'Vkienbcpringthis:visit; • Yo'4 Will rio Furh&::
' corresoorideirce. ah"f this visit... .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
pr,,3,4S. TAD c.-c. D5 2- I)J r w ts<..l T416 SVz_ A (LI:_ °ors
ju�C..a M µ Er10 eO gu m P au f ES u u E s ASP FGL-iS;4 ou r- u, Ta! �r v_sj4 L4 a s s R,
r.-5t- -r cwy �� Z�Nt a ✓� c- ,Z� G c1Esr �o �-„� .
Reviewer/Inspector Name rs 4, .il j wr 57 1-��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: lj� f _` ,M- Date: 1 • 119 hp 5100

,.
_.
-!.�ji.��h..,e[x..•�aYdFna.:�S�af:��ranM:iL�:t:ut�i}uL`dLrw.�r_J.fr...aaS'1' '� ..� u e ..� �.-.,� .,. �.. r
...nr.aWJi.Y4tx-..r.-:rAtd•.�S/r�w.r5wf.. kC�l,'�'e i� - Vtllf�irfY.hrh�a...
.+. ....._ .. ....., .. .« .�....., � .�....,� .� ._-� ._ -.�... ......... .. ... .,r�. .. ......_.

rn �L
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge LWor below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes J!I/No
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes Q No
roads, building structure, and/or public property) «
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? El Yes �rNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ;2�0
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
i
J
s/00

r.
.!` ...n S •. -. t "0'"
�DiVi9i6i o Soilan Water Conservation perateon Review
{t 1st 4f�F!.§P ..e+' h r
7
- � rhry
Yu54 L �s Y r�} Ar8..:i` .
3 De�vtston of Sotl and Water Conservatiota Compliance Inspection y r .
rr D.'f W,t�r Qlity tnpl'a*cnetn-
Davtstono
'g� fig
D.OtherAgency_ Operation Review •GG ��`�p
, 4r �t{ ,
r. .., _, ...: ^'•M•�i'P .v. . .. w.e t.r tip.:'F•i A%. _t•H .` °3 ..
,�{y 3._' t . '1 R §�-:.lt rr .r y, i.. .
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-uE of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
' Facility Number G _
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified l] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 3 NotOperational erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: K.. M .. County: .....................................................................................
OwnerNume:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...................................................... ......"Title: ... Phone No:
iklailing Address: .................
Onsite Representative:........ .. ........Cg-fi.zb ........ .... Intel;rator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ... ............................................... .............. Operator Certification Number:...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude =0 1 =" Longitude • =1
Design Current Design Current Design 'Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
ElFarrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons;.'. 10 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps o Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Im� rests
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Watcr of the Statc? (If ,yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Identifier:
❑ Yes �o
//
❑ Ye/ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
.❑ Y
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stru
Freeboard(inches):............................................................................ .................................................................................................... ......./
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Matc „f 111s[wction
6. Are there structures on-sile which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? � � Yes
❑ �o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;dNo
8. Does any part orthe waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? [ 'Yes ❑ No
9. Do ai,y stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes [ZNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improve ment'? ❑ Yes �No
11, is [here evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Pnndin ❑ Pr1,ti' ❑ Yes �o
12. Crop type r! - r,V 5 /5 1 _��— r 7
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those desiuna(ed in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'? ❑ Yes XNo
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receivingy crop need improvement? ❑ Yes QfNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Required Records & Documenl_ti
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes �2�0
18. Does the facility fail to have al; components of the Certified Animal % aste Management Plan readily availahle'?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback critcri,t in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively Certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ oremergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over applical.ion)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with ran -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP•?
0: �4Tq yiolaticjtis;or de>ticienci. .were noted during 3F�is;visit:... .. i. . . ..Rio further ;
' corres ori�errce: about: this : . ' . ' ' • ' . • • • • •
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recomm'endaiions or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):^.:
4s . .Ut-E-)o Tb F1 t SE -r-�O 5 ../ /
L-A r6
41,21 (_�,
�5Cfl-runt A LAJ k&t+ Is
_W417WLE_ — 1'� ��rc1 iz� �vk/- O V C_ 5�uti
❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ Yes 2'No
❑ Yes 2"No
❑ Yes [14a
❑ Yes P40
❑ Yes Oqo
❑ Yes JPINo
zYes ❑ No
Eat � f >915
Reviewer/Inspector Name c f J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: lj

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor lssne.r•
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes PN0
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes PNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the ]and application spray system intake not located near the liquid surf"tcc of the la��oon'? ❑ Yes P';No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes PKNa
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes F11-1
0
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenUtemporary cover? ❑ Yes No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
f
3/23/9e

� ivision of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
[O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other [
Facility Number Date of Inspection S I
Time of Inspection I t o0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered ' 0 Certified © Applied for Permit 13 Permitted [] Not Operational Date Last Operated
L!
Farm Name: 1N -6.JKK'.'"" i 1 � � �a I M S County: ....... Q r4.". p. ............................... ......................
......................................................................... .....
Owner Name:........... OAXJ
..
4 f I T..........I.................................... Phone No: 51D .. 7.7. 339 L ...........................
Facility Contact: AV....................µ................/..�...._....... ........ Title:.... Ak ..�rr....................-----.. Phone No:
MailingAddress:.... ill!AA........l:............f......'.4+Iv.....L........�r........................... ...............,...................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ....... 0... . �'�.b�t�e ................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator;............................................................................... .... Operator Certification Number:..................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®6 ®" Longitude [Hil' =` ®66
Design Current x', ,Design Current -Design Current
$wine
Capacity Pagulation;,Poultry Capacity Population` Ci►ttle ,,,
Ca�ritcity ,Populafinn,,,,'
Wean to Feeder
pp
❑Layer
❑ Dairy<
eeder to Finish
10 Non -Layer I
1
❑ Non-Dairy
arrow to Weanst
❑Other
Farrow to Feeder
z f
❑ Farrow to Finish
n'
Total Design Capacity,
❑ Gilts
g
f`
❑ Boars
'
t ° Total SSLw
ENti er of Lagoons o
, Hlding Ponds
❑ Sub surfac e Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
a Field Area
❑ 5 ry
�.
g
❑ No Liquid
Waste Management System
�"
,�; ter;
; m
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (RI No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes/No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N�
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes L! No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Z/+N0
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes L� No
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes VNo
<
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes
maintenance/improvement?.
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes LI/J No
7125/97

a
0
A

'g
"� �ac'rlit�lVumbe� —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures fLaeoons,11oldina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes OR No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure G
........................................................................
XYes ,❑�� No
Yes [30 o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No Pboy
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) L
15. Crop type�.5lr.lrl...................C.A.�.lj............,l�t�i�4N......................1.1�.!L..........................................................................�...............
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes L� No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 9<0
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? Ves
es L7 No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? A
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? 2Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily.available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[3• No.violations•ot; de'fciericies.werei -h6ted-diiring this,'visit.- NO,dwiI] 'receive-no-ftirther`
correspondepce d4out this'visit:• : , :..
— 0ej
C y6f
Si, N
type,
y AA,% II a M 64tId
TS N oT ga r "�
P it S y S4-p-wt
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Yes L•I No
❑ Yes Ll N
❑ Yes No .
o-
Seepgfe 4.M+<r GNa
Ao&J&-
04 ealicide PftJ .
0%1
q ra%J a%+,�
h119
Ao4Ses
7/25/97
)�
Date: .7A) All -A

•; ,
he .
E t
'� r 1� � �
� �
• � _ � t ,
+ .�
f � 1 +
a i r
. S� ' .
of .- .' S • � � � •'
�'�.. �� ► � t�

s 0 Division of Soil and Water-Con'ervation `Operation
C Division of Soil and,Wateir�ConseMahon 'Compliance ipspect�oe"
�IvlSlan Of Water' ualAty�'
G i3`i3 I1 it , _-- i , „P ✓ '., 4 S _ F H
AgC Qti0 1eri1C,.y; OpCratlonIRevleivt�t`
Routine Q Cum taint Q Follow-up of DW in5 ertion Q Fallow-u of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time: of Inspection 3 : �o4 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not O erational Date Lust Operated:
Farm Name lrs:.A.4.4.UT...........�.1 �................ County: ........... v/tA.SSA........................ .......................
OwnerName: .................................................. ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:...................................,............................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: l��U„�....... LRA>S-T'R
Certified Operator: .......................................................................
Location of Farm:
Integrator: ►.>r a+.iT
........................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude �• �' ��°
urrentDesign Current C
Put'SwCapacity Population o
apacattle
zI=
Wean to Feeder
pp
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Z
❑ Farrow to Feeder
01;arrow to Finish
B.&R
z
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Current
❑ Layer
;"
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity,
Total SSLW L
.......................
f
I a oon Area ][]Spray Field Area
Hold ri -Ponds/; Soli ;s h� g �y g. d traps � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Number of Lagoon's T.S ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ ❑ p
s-
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [-]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
XYes Oo
❑ Yes ,P�No
❑ Yes ZNo
[:]Yes
eONO
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes Poo
❑ Yes ZINO
Structure h
Freeboard(inches): .................................................................................... ................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ,?I' -No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

t
Facility Number: L'Q — q Date o Inspection S
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes XNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes. Vo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
elevation markings?
)0'**No
Wa%te Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
ZNo
2. Crop type G + Ia c..I A.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
VNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
IN
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ZN0
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
2"No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
; No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Ve�o
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
;1.40
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (icl irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'S10 yiolalricjris'or d�ficieticies mere ppfe�l d4rring ......isiYoit .wilt r'eceip . i.. #'u t�gr
' correspondence: abaU .this visit . - . .
❑ Yes �No
,&Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,`No
❑ Yes ;2'No
❑ Yes 00&0
❑ Yes 12<0
❑ Yes K0
❑ Yes Pll
3j a1
Comments'(r'efer to.questron #) Explain any YES+answers nd/or annsy recommendatioor a -ny oiliem r cotnents IE ,t41 E
E , 1 Y ,i
CJse'diawrng's of facility to'tetter explain situations (use add►tsonalrpages as necessary.wl)Et ,< i, ;li 6t,, €Emit ° j'^ ts€ Ett, ;Ei s;.0
'L'J A trCA- t- ; 4e- lc-r- 14 (�o a f � CAST 4 1 GA I'. C-" Vw'- GNMM' ZF A b L1 C V- iA o W rll PIV74 A+
lb -if- ; Eta - i 0 nt ac LCA-."V rr TE ie. '-CAC A w Nq-c'- cl ar-- 'TtJC STAB -
ofAr` F- CAMEL -ES; f+�a�+��EA e.+"TN"d foo I -VMS CG- Nef0CA"j tQN.. A7' 4EAJIT- 3 f106"e-
1 pwv,%e-E� tF Pungr" JG ycaa-• 110 unrQ .' �z EJ SA11k O ~� r A A. 9-F4Q.r, C4:Ij A,4dVl tLL V
9' t q-b aPeL-4 &jAv^ES •-a Ac.ro J4L� GRow,nrG GRaPS
GLE.A.-t je 01U�W Gam:W U••iPVL- 6QAiW'3"n!5_
_
Reviewer/Inspector Name
t,kl:E�,; 7:1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
t!s
Date:
3/23/99

J � � , ti
._ ' y �
� � � .
i
_. 4_...•�.�.:'rrt..a..n.�:V6.,�7.6':�..:h:�.¢J.. :: 7 '�. :e.�. �,. ,... _.. .:r^i ,a.xA �. e�.1•... :en���.l.:a�.` ,. �....., w..+_.I�: ,..... ,,�. .a.. e... .J. �.. ..r- .. ,.,y.. .a. .. .

CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date:
Completed Certification Form; Date: ty.?11�9�
4 <
Waste Utilization Plan; Date:
Amount of plant available nitrogen produced/used annually (f'-Y z r 77o Ibs)
Dominant soil series: 9rf Ap, Ge-- Z(og78
Crops to be grown:
Field Maps .
Based on usable . (Total=
Present day format w/RYES or actual records;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1/97)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1197)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1/97)
Usable=
application windows 2l1193;
Type of irrigation: Traveling Gun Solid -Set Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 911196) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 911196) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2196 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
9/1 /96)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21196)
REQUJRED RECORDS effective 9/1/96 PERMITTED FACILITIES-
� Waste application records (IRR 1 &2) General Permit & COC on site
_ Annual soil sample reports for 1999 weekly lagoon level records
(Cu index: )
(Zn index: )
Waste analysis - date last taken • e zr 9 B
PAN Ibs11000 gals. for structure #1
PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structure #2

FACILITY NUMBER k�,e - L(
FARM NAME: L,.tn t_W uY tS4L_L_
REVIEWER: �,i v� T,
DATE:
TYPE',
NUMBER # ANIMALS
LAGOON - PAN
POND - PAN '
Farrow/Wean
-2f b sow
2.5=
5.4=
A=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
T9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
=j
DESIGNIVOLUME CALCULATIONS:
Top of dike elevation:
Elev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume . ft3
Temporary storage volume ft3
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi)
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr):
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design .
Design
Design
Design
WUP - Days of temporary storage:
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:.
ft. 1' 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft. 2" 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft. Structural freeboard "' in.
ft.
Exceeds required volume?
Exceeds required volume?
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual -
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading
r

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 6 6 - _ Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: w A wj r N � t_ acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Tk,)uG + tr�� Camr3'r"l . 70pneration
1l eligibility item(s) Ft F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: � 14 u -Jr not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: .,�K 1 Ls lr 2 ct exemption El E2 E3 ip
Date of most recent WUP: ; Z 1 4 7 Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P9 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: .Z4,_B7 B _ pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
Wa^ity wA(7a�
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is comple►e
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table, in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and.Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails -one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over -application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last.two years of irrigation Tecords.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to -deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or.25% of total acreage identified -in .CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers -or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number 1�2 -_4
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
S
�-3
(' Z
c Z
( `f
�-
( �a
�
Z�
zZ.
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. if pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERS - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records,,cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in -the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
'4L S, 'rim l 9
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P1 Plan lacks following information:
P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):

r - r
Division of Water Quality
June 3, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Douglas Crabtree
4211 Saint Mary's Road
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Walnut Hill Farm
Facility #68-4
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
On May 25, 1999, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr. Hunt's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters
of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other
prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a result of
the inspection, the following deficiency was observed:
A condition of the Certified Waste management plan requires
annual soil tests to be performed for each field to receive
animal waste applications. No soil samples have been
collected for the waste application fields at this
operation. Also, waste samples are required within sixty
(60) days of application of wastes to the fields. Wastes
are typically applied throughout the year for this type of
waste system and thus a minimum of three samples will be
required annually if indeed wastes are applied throughout
the year. Keep in mind that wastes must be applied to
actively growing crops.

Mr.Douglas Crabtree
Page Two
Please respond to this notification within 30 days of
receipt. You should include in your response the actions
that you will take to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Mr. Brent Bogue, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

/ I
7
. 10 Routine
`Facility Number"
DSWC Animal.Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ 'Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
of DW ins ection �:O Follow-u 'of DSWCLreview -O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ` 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm. Status: [3 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex;1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified Q Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
- r13 Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated: ..................................................................rr..............................................:...............................,
FarmNaime: ; ll.l � {� ...... .r ......_................................... CoiEnty:...i..�.. ITiU �.......................... .................
OwnerName:. .....:.................. .............. ............ ............................................................... .....::.. Phone No:....................,.,................................................................
Facility Contact: ........................................ ....................................... Title:................ Phone No: .......................
MailingAddress: ................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
�,-.,,rr
OnsiteRepresentative: ....................................................................('�-atbT .. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ...................... Operator Certification Number
Location of Farm:
................................................................................. I ............................................ I ........ .................... I ............................................................................
.................................................................................................................. ... * ...........
.............................................................................................................................................
Latitude �• r-�` �'� Longitude
Type of Operation zw x
x 1?eslgn_ Current . DeSlgn x Current DeSlgn Current
Swine1` § Capacity lPopulation Poultry : Capacity Population i Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ID Layer ❑Dairy
fr [] Feeder to Finish ❑ Non Layer ❑ Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to We
F
Farrow to Feeder `6"� `l� Total Design Capacity
❑ .
Farrow to Finish
F�
El
Other
s
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Haldtng PondsX- - L❑ Subsurface Drains Present {i❑ Lagoon Area pray Field Area <I
r i rn��rrrrrr
�renl'1'al
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ,�] No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �] No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes m No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? /
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes jzNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes /P No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes g10
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require El Yes No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement'?
Continued on hack

Facility Number r —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
�o n .e,whch,need to,be properly.closed?-. Are there lagoons.or storage- sit i _ ,
Structures-1-Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure. 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
......................................:..............................................•---.--....---.............-....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
'❑ Yes No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes— 9N,o
❑ Yes /)1 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
...................................................................
❑ Yes ?
❑ Yes ///�No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes o
7
Waste ApUlication
l4.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ............ .. `� u k.................. .........:.. vlir&�.:.......................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes 0 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes g No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes IdNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes --fNo
20,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? -
❑ Yes A No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes .0No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes' ❑ No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Attn: Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
Dear Douglas Crabtree:
AN
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 25, 1998
SUBJECT:
Retraction of Civil Penalty
Walnut Hill Farms
Facility #: 68-4
Orange County
OV 97-59
On October 31, 1997, the Director of the Division of Water Quality assessed a $500.00
civil penalty against the owner of the subject facility for failing to designate an operator in charge
of the animal waste management system. After review of the information submitted in your
remission request it is my decision to retract the civil penalty assessed in case number OV 97-59
and close our file on this matter.
Please be advised that nothing in.this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply all applicable rules and regulations at the subject farm.,
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call
Shannon Langley at 733-5083, ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. E.
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
W -Reg><onalrOf—=-
Case file # OV 97-59
Central Files
}W LJ-uN
291998
C)EHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DM i
Facility Number
E] Registered © Certified Ci Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
Farm Name:.... .............HI.k-............FAX.�..�...-5..
Owner Name: ................................................... .........
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
,Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mtn)
rNot Operational �Drate Last Operated:
.. County: (J..&:�i:�G L
.......... Phone No: ................................................ .........................
FacilityContact: ... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ............................................................................
Onsite Representative: ... p.Cu- O'.. .Lr c �� .. g...........................................................
............ .... ............................. Integrator:
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude a �44 Longitude • 4 44
Design ,:Current ,
' Capacity Population
S,wipe,
VFeeder
oFinish
o Wean
Farrow to Feeder
a
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design A ,:'Current: Dw
ry . `Capacity Population Cattle Cap
(er JE1 Dairy
10Subsurface Drains Present jj❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
g #
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System`
c
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 11 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,C� No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes A, No
b. If discharge is observed, dill it reach Surface Water? (IF yes, notify DV4'Q) ❑ Yes �No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in VaUmin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ZNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? /21Ces ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes [a No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes I
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:
- 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes �No
Structures (Lagoonsgolding fonds.lush Pits etc.
9. Is less than
❑ Yes,6No
storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:...................................................................... .
Freeboard(ft):.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes I'--' No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes O No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes Fe(No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes 'O'No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes gNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop e .. Vv� L...............L..........................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes gNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes :Ef"No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ,'No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ETNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes C110
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
/
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes 0 No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 46No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes [� No
0No.viQ1ations or. deficiencies.werenoted-during this.visit.• You.'w'ill receiveno further,.
correspoiWe O about this vis L . :
Coettts�,(refer questom #��'�Explatn arry�YE� answers apolor arty;reeo�mmend'ati�uns�or a�J�oth�er coW�ym�..mentsN, y -g
S, K.�,j4 ,v,�K, °�,Tb .. C as4 'vF .` y , � - � " V � � �. AK`2 .lE � + s�+. ` F r'. 4 n f.t✓,� )ng`. 4 .�,°
fac�i�ty `use '
D�¢'
�� itt
t�dra nos of t.�` b�tt�:expEai► stttt�tinns. addiffunalipgges as<riecessar�j �
`' �:.h4
,� �E �
4nY �� PUF T'U F� /0,T
A.X 1 � 7 -6 j 0o 2: 5a off- /UI r; t 5at, 4
7125/97
« �
Reviewer/Inspector Name �, ; ��
L <§''. .. F 'ONn f`b�`e}i'PoF. , T.ew
1 Date:
Reviewer/Inspector 5ignaturA" aVUG 11-11 —

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
L?enith and _N tm wi Resou.-i_S
Division of Water Quafity
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor.
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 15, 1997
Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
Subject: Removal of Registration
Orange County
Dear Douglas Crahtree:
p
C
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an active animal
waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population, does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not -
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to S 10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liouid waste system
30.000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
-PVM
cc:CRaleigh-Water Quality -Regional -Office
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-SO83 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water. Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 31, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT .REQUESTED
Attn: Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
�EHNF�
Nav � � is97
L_.�_�- —
DEHNR RAR1GH REGIOrIAL OFFICE
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and
15A NCAC 8F .0201
Walnut Hill Farms
Facility #: 68-004
Orange County
Case #: OV 97-059
Dear Douglas Crabtree:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and a notice of a civil penalty assessed against
Douglas Crabtree in the amount of $500.00. This assessment is based upon the following facts:
Douglas Crabtree operates an animal operation and associated animal waste management
system in Orange County.
As of January 1, 1997, in accordance with N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201
a certified operator in responsible charge is required to operate the subject animal waste
management system.
In accordance with 15A NCAC SF'..0201(a), the owner of each animal operation having
an animal waste management system must submit a letter to the Certification Commission,
Division of Water Quality (DWQ),'Technical Assistance and Certification Group, which
designates an Operator in Charge with the appropriate type of certification. This letter
must be signed by the owner and the certified operator and be submitted to the
Certification Commission by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date.
In November, 1996 and April,,1997, DWQ mailed notices to all animal waste management
facilities who had not designated an operator. with the DWQ.
P.D. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Douglas Crabtree failed to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment
operator in responsible charge of the subject animal waste management system, in
accordance with 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a).
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Douglas Crabtree violated
or failed to act in accordance with the requirements of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F
:0201. A civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per day may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator as
required by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.5 and 15A NCAC 8F .0500.
Based upon the above facts and conclusions of law, I hereby assess Douglas Crabtree a
$500.00 civil penalty for this violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201 pursuant
to the authority delegated to me by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201.
Please find attached another Operator in Charge designation form. Please complete this
form and return it to:
WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If the aforementioned operator designation form is.not at the above address within 30 days
of your receipt of this notice, you will be subject to further civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each
day that the operator in charge designation is not submitted. You may contact DWQ's Training
and Certification Group at [phone] for information about designating a certified operator.
Within thirty days receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment
to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for renssion or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative

i.
hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to -the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chiei/DWQ
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Richard Whisnant
Office of General Counsel
NCDENR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
1
A. Preston Howard, Jr:, P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement. File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public information Officer w/attachments

r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT }
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST }
PERMIT NO. }
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADIVIINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. �
Having, been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of -the Division'of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 19
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CAPER ATOR IN CHARGE
ESI ,,NATT FORM
ANIMAL WAST9-MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility M Number: County:
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address. _
City S Late Zip
Certificate - Social Security T
Work Phone Horne Phone
Signature Date
OWNI ER
Mailing. Address. City
State Zip Telephone
Signature Date
Please Mail to:" 'GPPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality'
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535;

M�State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office A
.dames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, 'Secretary [D EH H N FZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 29, 1997
Mr, Douglas Crabtree
4211 St. Mary's Road
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 68-4 & 68-41
Walnut Hill Farms
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
On August 25, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facilities. This inspection is pall of the Division's eflorts to determine compliance with the State's animal waste
nondischargc rules.
The inspection determilied that the swine operation (#68-4) was not discharging ►Fastcwater into waters of the State and that
the waste pit system had an adequate amount of fi-eeboard. As a result of the inspcetion, the facility was found to be in
compliance with the State's animal nondischargc regulations.
The inspection also determined that facilit-, #68-41 is a pastured cattle operation and therefore, not -subject to reguiatol".
annual inspections. Enclosed is a request form for the removal of this facility from the Concentrated Animal Feedlot
Registration. Upon receipt of this signed request, the Raleigh Regional Office will recommend that your cattle operation
be removed from the registration database.
I would like to renrund you of the requirement to have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan for your swine operation
by December 31, 1997. This plan must be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. Please
continue to work with the technical speeialist of your choice to ensure all necessary modifications to your operation are
implemented and certified prior to the statutory deadline. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigli Regionai Ofricc appreciates,your c(x)ln ration in this matter. Ifyou have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Terri Hollingswort.1i at [phone].
Sllicel"eiV,
Ju • Ganctt
Water Quality Section Supeii,isor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Brent Bogue, Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
38W Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Ni
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 * C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 ii 5CM recycled/IM6 post -consumer paper

WZoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 1 16
Facility Number
Time of Inspection W_ oQ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status. registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑� Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....... ..... . .................... ..... . .................................. ........ ................... ....................... .................
FarmName:....\l�l. 1J 1`...+�/..1}�a�. ...... ................... ...... County:.......'..................................................
Land Owner Name:-.d..... .......�` r- ........................ Phone No: ...CN..l�.."k _.S QL...................
Facility Conctact:.... .0 .....5..���� Title:.... ............. .... Phone No:.... - .......................
Mailing Address:... `.......... .....:................ ..:l .!.!..�... `fir .. ..NC.�..�..-...�� �._.........., ..........................
Onsite Representative:...... ..... .............................................. Integrator: le'A. r�_..Q...f_sm ... ..................
Certified Operator:.. i? ?... „5 5?Qy!.. .,.... ........................ Operator Certification Number:...,......................................
Location of Farm: ^S' [ Q 2. t� 0„
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Q
......................................................... ................................................................................................................. ..................... ................ ................................................. I ..... a
Latitude 4 « Longitude 4 "
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Design Current rat W.
DesigCu e it� Design 'Current
SWlnekt . a r :., a wrP' u w
w�a Ca aci " P`o° ulatian Poultry>; ,# mCa acl Po elation . ;pk Cattle ,x • Ca acePo u[atroa:
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer `x ❑ DaiTy
❑ Feeder to Finish I❑ Non -Layer � y` ❑ Non -Dairy]
arrow to Wean `� �. # ��
Farrow to Feeder 2 O Z. btal.�Design Capact
Farrow tQ Finish -',''q.
♦t pp ...
ng
�.
£ Number of Lagoons/,�HoldingPonds ❑ Subsurfacc Drams Present
t WE
❑ Lagoon Area % j ❑ Spray Field Areaiml
.::
• erne �•
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q-No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 91-No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes M-<o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes U-No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? 4
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes®'Io
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2<0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes I�No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

F" O ity Number:..,? ...— .............
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 2 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes RB o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? `> - Yes ❑ No
Structitre aooits-and/o_r_Jiolding Qndsl N
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Aaste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑M'h'fo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
... �...
Crop type.... {f�,�n......................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designa ed in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
"a
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
1; PXo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Cp-<o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O-Ko
20:
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
13"N0
2I.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
O'No
F-or_Certif
22.
ied F ce_tlitigs Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Ise drawirigs'of facility to bette
„> e ...
Reviewer/Inspector Name LAj
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
any. YES answers and/or
situations (use addition'
Date: V lxr=;
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Qualify Section, FaMity Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborou
APR
DEW RALEICFI
REGIONAi OFFICE
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
e��
�EHNR
April 3, 1997
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Walnut Hall Farms
Facility Number 68--4
Orange County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending.you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet 1
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, N'OcAn
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/101/o post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Douglas Crabtree
Walnut Hill Farms
4211 St. Mary's Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Walnut Hill Farms
Facility ID#: 68-4
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
! e
[DF_=HNFZ
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
oward, Jr , Director
ivision of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O, Box 27687, W 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 NV f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 :.. 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

-ii;.:�% jy, u
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, YMPFA
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office
James a. Hunt, Jr„ , Secrnoretary [D F F1
Jonathan B, Howes, Secrets C
Boyce A. Hudson, Regionai Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 22, 1995
Mr. Doug Crabtree
4211 St. Mary's Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Walnut Hills Farms Swine Operation
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
On July 18, 1995, Mr. Ted Cashion from this office conducted
a compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection
is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems
associated with waste disposal systems.
Mr. Cashion's site visit determined that wastewater from this
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the State.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of
Environmental. Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties, and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office also reminds you that, if- not already
accomplished, an approved animal waste management plan must be
incorporated by December 1997. This plan must be certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Crabtree
September 22, 1995
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Mr. Cashion at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
� Judy GGa et
vrv"Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\crabtree.ins

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 3, 1995 w1 t
Mr. Doug Crabtree
4211 St. Mary's Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
RIM. *A
al 21
E:)EHNR
A f fvm e
se:7'
Subject: Compliance Inspection �a
Walnut Hills Farms Swine Operation
Orange County
Dear Mr. Crabtree:
( o�7 )
r�
On July 18, 1995, Mr. Ted Cashion from this office conducted
a compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection
is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems
associated with waste disposal systems.
Mr. Cashion's site visit determined that wastewater from this
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the State.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties, and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office also reminds you that, if not already
accomplished, an approved animal waste management plan must be
incorporated by December 1997. This plan must be certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, north Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Crabtree
August 3, 1995
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Mr. Cashion at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\crabtree.ins
n

- -
`�r:
j
,.
Y

h JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROf1 LEN WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.a2/O2
Site Requires immediate.Autnnnm.- _.L" o
Facility No. G N..: `i -
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SFM VISITATION .RECORD
DATE:✓� � , 1995
Time: 1.1 - 3,1. M .
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County: - -Ur
1i
Integrator:
On Site Representative: dog
Physical AddressJLocation: of S
Phone:
cr, frt e Phone:
Type of Operation: Swine '� Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity. ��! 17 (� Number of Animals on Site: STO saws
DENT Certification Nvbabe:r: ACE DEM Cerrification Numb: ACNEV-
Latitude: 34 b ' 06 � -j!j ff- " Longitude: 2'V- 0/ "' ��%%� Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the .Annnal Waste Lagoon have sufficient. freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour stop-n event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or NoJV4 Actual Freeboard: -----Ft. Inches 46/ '
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o4No Was any erosion observed? Yes or 1 0
Is adequate land available for spray'? (�jpor No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: _ Orc4 a,/g.,a-rx
Does the facility meet SCS mi.ni-mturm setback criteria"! 200 Feet from Dwellings? Ye or No
100 Feet from Wells? �S)or No
-J-e aramal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or l�
ani-mal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS N11ap Blue Line'? Yes No
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by tnan-made ditch, flushing systein, or other
;iTr.i;a.r man -inane devices? 'Yes or If Y s. Please Expl:drl:
r)i,cs me f.ac:llity maintain adequate waste ama.rtagernerrt records (volumes or rtianure, land applied,
spray rtxigated can specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: L✓aj e S f N k, v,fa , '�r vnd�ei 4 p o
�R90�reSe�, - - —
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
1�
siguature
Use Attachments if Needed.
V1-_1
TOTAL P.J2