680001_PERMIT FILE_20171231

• d
.._':.:kxS, V ,1l p +•!t ,m. .,r" __'6 N.i �.. p ..,... 'dn*'.- ; . o
ti, � r �� ;x� Division of Soil and Water''Conserva on �g-Operat,onReview 3
r T" 1:, .fy_•ei'a`a'ii J.. un:aab x w " ,� <
s ,at Division U$ail and Water Conservation , Compliance Itispectton
- Rrrsx-."..sl •; .� Sr ii i" SAL "'� .s.; �yy gi•xri T
• -� a C Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspec ono
-
i D Qt ter Agency '�Opeergtion Review � I
r ix . .•f.a �_ia .....,. ,zu ,e•s.i_.,. ...� .nax .. .c.. �. .. x..... ...+9..�,t ate,`-.x ..9. .._. ..sT�i e..3..--._nA+��tz'i<<. �'.I1.`,..r�k.,.
*Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection gWollow-u of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number -_ N, ; ] Date of Inspection JI
Time of Inspection EZj= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Permitted ❑ Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 3 Not O crational Date Last Operated: P ..........................
FarmName:.............................................................................................................................. County:.....`r2 rr" C�..............................
Owner Name: Phone No:
FacilitvContact: ............................ .................................................. Title ................................................................. Phone No:...............................................--..
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Intel;rator:................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ..................................................... I ....... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 1 Longitude ' 1 i4
Design - Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity :Po ulation ,. Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity o ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Nan -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity -
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
rg ns `' Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Number of La Dons ❑ P y
Holding Ponds}'/Solid Traps}} ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is ohserved, dial it reach Writer of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
%Vaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: j
Freeboard(inches): .! V........................................................................................................ ...................:.......................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
seepage. etc.)
r
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on brick

Facility dumber: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need rnaintenancchmprovement'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Aomlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pendcd for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IS.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps. e!c.)
❑ Yes
w�o
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? Oe/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? -
❑ Yes
❑ No
22,
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
es
/❑
❑ No
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Yes
❑ No
yigiaiiQtis o:r defirienri. . ... noted d4firig fhls'visit: • Yoit Will-te 0h,161io; lour#ltO
corres• oridtei-i& about tKs .A'S its
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations'or any other comments. -
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)..
Reviewer/Inspector Name r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I t

.w `' 7 -. ds. "x� T r. t..,"� �`�:1 a Z''."7'. '�.: a_ .`'lbli.,S'""" F€C •i Eii .t�ih st'. y ,� 3 aFF €� € r, -at 1a 6f$� �� €$�<-iv 3�t3991ab=.e.
s,r Fs3.. 4 4a I �'y ? t },.a 3j i§€a ti•e IS€ E <,{- a 5.�€.; F, i p.:.r,;..r � � �' l « ��, i� d
`. ,. n��;, �, ; �, . ,'�'� Q..Divisior►'OfSoii and WaterConservatlott �� ! � €€` 4 '' 6v �°'� ,{a €fait i tr6 '�
- ' : ',;.k3 .,-! i .-.:§-... �E..I: ��Sl,t€#,,, ,. -.€.: €.sa,.. t#..a �9, c.E,p (., �, �'i., �"$ �..i;�� �{ i"�t; sE�€i�.. i§, I�,s:,'; # V#��:, :' � E€ > i€�l 9k.�4t.1.�•`� �p���,!�?`" �,,-'�`,!i :.
Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or Visit: ! r Timed 11qSfN'
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
T
Permitted Ce tied onditionally Certified ©Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: °gyp
Farm Name: ' '���' County: f
Owner Name: ! 1 Phone No:
Mailing Address: S� 7 T__�GtC� &fr _ f!�,`1�-� e Al 2 7 Sr72,
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine Poultry
❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Design' ' Current Design Current' Destgn Current 1
.Swine : E,"
zCa acitv;' Po ulation,. , :'Po " r E. '.Ca ac tv .:#Po ul aln'. �",Cattle € ..`��,0` Ca acity .i.0 ulatton
❑ Wean to Feeder
ILa er ; ❑Dai ;,
El to Finish
❑Non -Lay r i
Non-Daiaj
❑ Farrow to Wean
1` 3
;r § € 11
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other c
❑ Farrow to Finish
t
j' Total iD6iinlC�pacity.'
❑ Gilts
E, ,
❑ Boars
Total SSLW ,,�1'
? ? i € _ . i
.
p ', i:b —A
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area
Nambero1"f Lagopns } 1 j
i VI # � f j�f 3
ioldtn'=Ponds'l;Solid Traps ..f� i 3,€,' ❑ No Li uid Waste Management System
1
❑7 S rav Field IIArea E„
Discharges &Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
El Yes o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
identifier: -10
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection l 1'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes [f No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an !
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q No,
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes TjNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes QNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes EfNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes PNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? [:]Yes No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �No
Required
Records, & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑'No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
r j
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
J 40
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
rNo
22 Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
�No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes]
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑Yes
t
No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to -question #) Expiein,a y YE sanswers_and/or�,any recommendations -or anyZother4eomments. „
tT_Cp n
Usc:draw►ug"s of faellity to better explain situations: (use additionalge pas as necessar❑
y) ❑Field COUP Final Notes
,+L
e,� �.�� I ,
t w Sizes
54 are. -f'r�'ru �Cts c
or
't'L'�+ �Gfi;t' 6 7 G41� A
Q p o, o,
it,frtl
Reviewerllnspector Name 1
Reviewerllnspector Signature: - Date:
O5103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection rr a Z
Odor LMU
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ��No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �lo
❑ Yes O'K/O
Additional.;Camnnents'and/urVrawin s• . n:
05103101
05103101

/k3E4�'EBWatCryyjQ'
�24f4111i4'i�3�9i�i���i31tRl�?i6Yit�5x3�iriN " iYl{i:1���
5'iO DivtstoniofjSailandWaterConser�i�thMA 6n,g
LI
f Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
n for Visit O Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
E
Facility Number Date of Visit: 11/1/2402 Time: 1:45 pm
Not Operational p Below Threshold
Permitted X Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 2,1112Q0.0......-
Farm Name: Gates Brothers Poultry Farm County: Qrange............................................... RRO ............
Owner Name: Mike Clayton Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: !(51Q7Aally..Midge.Road..........................
Facility Contact: ...........................................
Onsite Representative: ................................
Certified Operator: Curtis.M...................
Location of Farm:
Narthrn Orange Co. on o
...... Ro:ugemoni..NG................................................... 2.7572 ..............
..................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
..................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Clayton........
ge xu.) approx.
................ Operator Certification Number:211830.............................
wy. :1 1 i'N. on
❑ Swine ®Poultry ❑ Cable ❑Horse Latitude ®w �, �« Longitude �°
Dest n, "' 6 urrentDesl ri Current '"' R Design ' CUCTent
g R ti 14 r,, g, E , CEattle G 1
Swore Ca act Poulat�on,s�,Poultry Capacit Population' Caacrt iEPo ulahon
P, Y, P. €,. i s c y,_..,., .. E.. t �€ €1�1 P yElxt p .,?
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to iris
❑ Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Fee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
❑ Boars
I
60,000
240,000
....... ..............
Discharges & Strearn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
WasteCalleglion -& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 11 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stricture 6
Identifier: ..............W .............. ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... n/.a............... .................................... ................... .................................................... .................................... ....................................
05103101 Continued

05103101
l heilityNumber: 68_t
Date of Inspection
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ig No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes Ig No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ll No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
o violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments 'refer to'fy1"uestloii # IEzRlaan a„_°YES'answers3'3anilloran"recoimiindations'oirtaq "3'okla'eir cotniments:.4 '''``°:igi,Y94, 9};; _=
�(•e; r + t' + s,.. y', f'EE 3Ei� i'. 2 .' hF < t'x4t' ee 6 .e yE .. `"E' , . E F i EBe ;s4 dE r'y 's2si : s3 i' s'st .• QQ 451E qq43 tt %,.€ i ��999Y4.
-E - FE. .9e 'f'..E T.. �iqqtt 66(kc EEErea d I€S...S�S°8E4$Ei5y�3E£4f1Y .$,b, iII 33{{ sE i!i Si S1' EE4l1.E. 3 �:3.� E3t5
°d°<@ f1f t14tl i.333t9 .iii9a ,.Fe Ehy'�SIe♦ {3Ef�i. .i(F[�Flel�sti{jb 5t'it E`¢I�j{e . �a 3611..tl } l�i!3§Sdi1.i�.i �iiE }i§btiii',iii{YBYfY<i��i6 6EE� i jif e 51i1riy ^S$Etl�!1�1€E[1.1.:iFJfiE1 �i.iF� �1�?r49$}. Y..ii}a_i{{{ n...i{ rl k 5,
Use drawingsi;of facilltyttabetterdexplain"Sltnations y(use additlonal�pagesas!necessary)� �,;;.
3,s
4 r d s a j � tls sg?: �� € � I� }fir. �! �> s 1 s(�� E f 'E� �. � b i � i� (� xi � tx'
i�3a���i�;i�i:,.ss�1i9��la���4,��titlg9l�i���9`J�1�1;!%�`�i��§it�01���!i;s_}7�;E�B���.�flt4�<��t;�`�4��,���g§�ii�4�'s1i'.i.$}�bls���l:�+�i�i�i_:?'�lt�fi§ii���4,t����!i!���i"���
s'
`iEF:
, `y
,,3
Lagoon was closed at the time of the inspection. Lagoon closure has been reviewed and certified by local soil and water and NRCS Eng.
Local soil and water are preparing closure information and documentation. Requested copies of the subject information be submitted to
this office.
Application fields( Rye mixture) were in good condition. No ponding or runoff was observed.
Lagoon site will be landscaped and reseeded by owner per NRCS recommendation.
RE{1..§., €, f- E$ie �.E°EYe§.
eviewer/Inspector Name gi xstt kk': i �,, �gai,€ �Et.
E 11e$ d . 5 ..'I
Signature: Date:

DSWC Animal. Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection N
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:tnm)
Total Time fin fraction of Hours
Farm Status: El Registered- 0 Applied for Permit` (ex;L25 for l hr iS min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified [] Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
.
Farm Name:.L/ .%3. .....,l,�l� .�� 1 i7�i`h..._�....�..�... County: ..................................................:..................................
Owner Name :..................................... ....... Phone No:
Facility Contact: ....................................... .... Title:..................... ......... Phone No:................
-- �?<.. ... _, ... ._. wr.-� .t.. a+, -. , r....-..r. .. n-_ - •- - 1 ..-..-« .... ... .-. i. cYY. ♦ _-.c.�.,. .�.al."ut..atw_.<.=:+n".j�=l �<. ,. a,-a:Chl�" , « :..
1�9ailing Address:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
s»OnsiteRepresentalive:.i.��.Lr...........jr-%i:�.:~:...:...:....... Integrator::~::.:.'.:::::::"':�:.._...:.-:;.�.4::::..... :.....:......
�-i M. w-:ww.. _..- ..- ,.A r.i i_w. -.+. w� ..r.. r-..1'rf.py,..—n 1...,.,a�e.....• ',ni� - .. -. r. s.�.:n ....,- xn :.a.-+.. v+,fr.Y..F 1... - • a. <.w r..u�,.irv,•rw :rr.,.. .. _, .. _ ..
Certified Operator: ,,.•.•...••„•....••.................................... ......... .... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
=a= � Location of Fttrm:. - .......................
........................ I ........................................ ...........................
�" I:atitude� .�_^ • ` � r- ;n. I-b-n-otudc, I !` �c _.�.,= �« .;» ..L �. • .. Y
r „yam• }a•% '.
Numberkaf�Latioans I:Hbldtttg Pond§;, -' `- l,'JID Subsurface Drains Present ,L-agoon Area•-� 10 Sprray Field Area 7�
is �; ..
:i,.' �,. �,q i^ y•',�;k ':X%'iYye S 'f�+vY� '.'d:.m„WA^3.K , )J�':.„,
-_ . u..<:,
<I :.. -•.x It s, _. - � r. .. _ ., ...-... ., - 1- -
+'+W`4 �r�ner.11+�lrFiw++aR'•rt�c4k�`7.1:.1'..«�.7H vrpK1?w..yria.nrNN .w�xa.=�xw.+�.�-'d�'w.rsfr�.a e�a.•.yf;:y+.re-"eW+�„rY:.vnr.,.a'.,,a14Y>,+-XCI�„'—,^M-ass rfar+`�u.eCF tszt;T,Yop,��w �.p3u'eY,x:a�+„vi.r:>�... .
;� . .J,'. �t �}i5 Y1�'rw.71S � „t ,S �.1 �.�Awl.a S"'•� ri S e.l[ 1.L- ., _ 'i .. ) {0. .0 FT. �r,i ,
i' `Are themany buffers that need iriatntenance/improverrent� -
❑Yes kNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes L No
Discharge originated at:-. ❑ Lagoon ; ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made'?
❑ Yes. [],No
b . If discharge is observed;•did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify ❑WQ);;,,
No : -
,. X, ,,�&,,. , . ,�.� _ , c:. If discharge is observed; .what is the estimated flow in gaUnun?�- a " -• � �-� � �� .' .�-� ��� r;�,w��•�!�" 1-
dDoes�d•�,ey,rge by,1 a ti . caiy�suteq�5 nw'..yes, DWQ)
• � � �(.
:ueL�i,Mf.OY'.,+.+fl-.�x..-W�W.iS•'kti�i��l+wr?t�'l.'"..acF-�',�ij1i�1Ni'WNes-i'?h�'H'Y.n'eZ?�-�,4.i8,+i..+TM:�'ow'1'.Y)�:J.iRxo)�Yw_�Y'M'I.Y•`,:�h�'.:-4x�.i..+w,4.�.i
t 4�13: Is'ttiere`evidence'of "a"s ' .°° ra �!{;�� 4�. u{sue; ,:i� °ems ❑eyes` ,CJ'No�s�
past arge from ariy part'of the ope tron y
$. _ `f ,.k
{`,+1 1 :'•••• ... .. -.. _, i _CI.. Ir ..Y '. �,-Hi
r
S -.
[w�<
" ;.+* id+T',,���
L, c4 Were there any adverse impacts to the waters`of the State other than from a`tlischarge �f 1r� `
Z iL
~` �� S r 3Yes ILI�No
"; j eel•
.... 1• - -. ' ...--�:..h'.•}.`v.t.. e. Nli lv.i ,xr.. 's°Yc•I:�:i 2v. eT dF•. ..>?3.',.,[-` :<.n,. .t::5,i..',i"surry u. --;� Ww 7,4, {h 7a i:..i.:S Y., 136 `!"•"ta.eY `�WW %.� ,w}"d! ,� ��,4
5. Does any'part ofkthe waste m_ anagement system (other than Iagoons/holdrng ponds) require ❑Yes [Na -
s'` rriainten ce/iniprovem&V .
"4i36/47
Continued on hack`

Facility Number:
.t
'S: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes EI o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes (IV0
Structures (Lagonns and/or Holdipg Ponds) /
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): �trijcture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
1--`......................................................................... ...................... ........................... ......................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [rNo
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ET&o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9•I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or envir'onmentaE threat, notify DWQ)
13., Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?..., _
..._ .-._.,. - .. r , .«. _­ /Yes . ❑ No
Waste Application
-„r
Is there physical.evidence of,over application?
❑ Yes �No-_.,.__
._ .- _ _
___ •
1
.�_ _.... (If .inexcess of WNW or runoff entering waters_of the State, notify, D)%.,; .,,,.r:, .•_
_,w �;; ���, :.. �. .._•.__.._ _..�.
_
15. Crop type ! v.��...................................................•-........................... ........................ .........................:...........................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? "'� ❑ Yes ( (No'
17 Does 1W.factlity. have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?_ _ _ _ —._._ .
_..
_ ❑.Yes_ To.- -•--•-
w,.., _
�, �........
18 Does the receiving crop need improvements _ __._ _
_. .,_ _.____. ❑.Yes [�No
19:=Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? " - - -
'" = ❑ Yes ` (2(No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by. same. agency?
❑Yes RrNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
- ❑ Yes' 94o
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes- o
24. Does record keeping'need improvement?' -
❑ Ye)s �o'
Or
/
T•/q.:/L.�//�/+�++/��� '4 �/) /-j i. /,�)n�,y - It' / �L �/•.'�=A,/�,` 3�..���r�¢ ��k..-` �3>i
�Trr.c ./-d' .-s�T•+: G.•L��r'Evir �. `' 'ice-.M�1' 1. .�...�. G 1 �+ Vi�i Y ,�...V a[rq f '-s�SW;
l r�N�V � � P� %� '� `•'
Reviewer/Inspector Name -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
15,
.: �,.. _ �� -:4' a. nr ,a�„_Date �,�'�� t c6.� �• 1L�� r ���
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water
Section, Facility Assessment Unit
_ 4/30197

►1 , . CrAr- g12/9g
❑ Divisionrof Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
iivision of Water Quality
JO Routine WComplaint O Follow-up of DWQ inseection O follow-u t�ttf I)SWC review O Other J
Date of Inspection y
Facility Number �, )
Time of Inspection
F6 3[r 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered © Certified 13 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ....... a.t.................... 1.r.r..y..................................................... County':................ 0C.6e;YR...........................................
.
OwnerName: ....... C..r...b................ ....... C "Y4. n.................... ..................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...C!d.�. �.s.... C luy,, y Title: ..... Phone'No:
MailingAddress:......................................10......0......................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator; ................... .. Operator Certification Number
Location of Farm:
C
Latitude 0 1 0« Longitude • 4 "
CurrenE.x<
Desigiu¢ Current; iF H _ Design
Current
,'De'stn
�Swtne'ht Capacity Population Po u ry
Capac. Population' Cattle CapacityYPopulahon
❑ Wean to Feeder
Layer
C cx,
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non Layer
❑Nan-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
_. .E,s�
e , ,;z� 4
[� Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
k g
P
❑ Farrow to FinishF
gn Capacity'
n�
❑Gilts:
❑ Boars
% „a.
�3 � atyT&Al SSLW<
'ten
-.
.:ate'
Number; of Lagoons l Holding Ponds
©' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ©Lagoon Area I[] Spray Geld Area
ti g t❑ . No Liquid Waste Management System
�.
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? -
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance matt -made^
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surrace Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
-d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125/97
❑ Yes
LG <, ❑ No
❑ Yes [1lo
❑ Yes 03-Ko
M,' es
❑ No
❑ Yes
�lo
❑,/Yes
@' o
eyes
❑ No
❑ Yes
I_�' NNoo
❑ Yes
i,�f No ,
Continued on back

1% ,
Facility Number:' —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes M<O
Structures (Lagoons,Holdin Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 2r<es ❑ No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): .........
..iP!.. ............................................. ........... ........................ .................................... ....................... I ...... I ..... .........
,,,,,,,,,,
10. Is seepage observed from.any of the structures? ❑ Yes B<O
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ERIKo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes GKO
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
0 Yes
❑ No Ail}
Waste Application
�,/
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
L7 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
l5.
Crop type .....rc cl..................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
Elf4o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2<0
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
E4
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Ye.
M40
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
es
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Q No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
R<o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Ong
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
92'No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
("No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
EKo
0, No'vioIH'dons'or de'rcieneies. cre noted during this'.visit.- You.'will receive no' Airther
::�correspQndeince.ab"out this.visit.•:�.�:�`.:�:�:-:•�•:•�.. ..�.��•.•�.•..�..� ��. :•�•:•�.•:.�..:
(V e d ID re,-, �-
O,Pc,aj chi C. k eN S
deli d
.5-eetc-�- f'e.),c t
h7.4.4 bu)6 . i:.
�V &L—J
h'IPAad.
yr,r.,-ZeA,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
4 0, i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L " A
,�rn
)GJr- oOA),
Date:
0v pAe ,
7/25/97

0 Di iston of Soil and Water. Conservation ❑ Other Agency
` ivision of Water Quality
0 Routine 0 Coro laint OTollo,v-u or im ins Lotion 0 Follow-up of I)SWC: review 0 Other
Facility Number / Date of Inspection
2:E_Z_zp� Time of Inspection I :v o 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ®-Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted [ Not O erational Date Last Operated
Farm Name:...,... G.1.. ko _r �,,.T �� f� County ...........L, t..!�£... .......................
., .................................................................................. '`,fit. .....,,....................
OwnerName: ....... t u r'f.......................... ....... C rty..47 j............................................ Phone No:..,..................,.......,,........................................................
FacilityContact: .................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
1
MailingAddress: .......�?........�...,....X........ �`.:';..'.�°IQ........ �.: .........................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ......................... Integrator:........!
.. .....................................I...................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
......................................................................................................................................................... .,..................................................... ............................................ .
...y................................% c.......... :.....��+Y...Y .............................. �... ......
Lautuae L_ I- l I. I Longnune I - l, l__.__-.I..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes O No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes i<o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray -Field' ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 1 i%o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M410
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 01 o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? M"fes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes R<o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ON o
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 3"&o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 19<0
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: •.as .... ....... �.....
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
~ 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which'need to be properly closed?
Structilres (LAP-0011S an Holding
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
41"
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes Ej`No
❑ Yes 13<0
❑ Yes @<o
L7 Yes ❑ No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid Ievel markers?
Wastc AVOlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of W//rMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
t... 15. Crop type 6£L.q1 .................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes OIo
❑ Yes M'1`Io
❑ Yes GJ-No
Q Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M<0
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes 2<o
❑ Yes 1EKO
❑ Yes l] No
M'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes l_!I <
❑ Yes [KO'
❑ Yes 1 Nfo
❑ Yes L�'No
Comments (refer toquestion #) Explainany YES answer's and/or any reco mendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better exp.Sarn situations ;(use additional pages as necessary)
F,?�
6 oar) 14,0
l
/
14 Dort 4,,of P ; N
or sPPpRqe-
�lOu� S'��vJQ w f+� Na S�'JNS O� S%ONJ�•1 uy
_. 1 k '�0i• f�
Reviewer/Inspector NameC t x :^�s� r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

H
Routine O Coni >laidt ' O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 1
Tine of Inspection , D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 0 Certified [3 Applied for Permit L] Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:........
Farm Name: ...-. :.TE.5t...........8 .17�j........................... County: ... 0...(.L -e ....................... .......................
OwnerName: ......................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ....................................................................... .. Title:...................... ... Phone No:
...............................................................................................
MailingAddress:..................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
..................��...................................
Oasitc Representative:...1....:. , K-E C�- ` . -v g....................................................
.............................. .......................:. Integrator:
Certified Operator; ................................................ . Operator Certification Number:...................
Location of Farm:
Latitude E--1 Longitude
Design , , «,
K g �, . Design prrent ; s Design �Current�
5wrne .; Capacrty;,ePopulattan
Poultry Ca acit Po ulation�� CaEt1e
P Y, P
Ca aci Po erlahan
P
ry``
.,.
;I! ❑Dairy€:
.h'F..P
Er
Layer ❑ Nan Dairy
❑ Other YWo
: k
Kc�:
k
�� `Total�D`esgn Capacity
� .•` ;3: �E-
�
Total SSL�W�
,
�Nivabe o� Lagoons I H6ldmg Ponds:
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Areea
`�"x,L y5,^2,€4Y` �{ �. 2 3�2 Y W CR A` G7 ❑V11
No Liquid Waste Management System
� " �`{
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �io
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ( No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes} No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
main tenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes PINo
' ed operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes rCC/��,No
"`"" (inn/ittTrnA n,tt hnn1r

, . Facility Number: %= _]
8. Airp there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ YesN0
Strudures (Lagoons.HoldinPonds, _Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):..............':..........................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes �No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes WNO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? M'�Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Doaf t uc� es lack adequate mm mum or mix mu?g, liquid lev marke s7 Yes ❑ No
?i 'I1~''�'`'JWastecation-/}6-eVAJ ��,, �[, M/3794 , 4
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes #No
(If in excess of WNP or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type > `� iU..�..................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those ignated in the Annjtnal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
�
-j i(j0 CO" a." 3 1, GJ a e jo lhr1LiC( f- ` kh.�, 'IE-6
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available w tea pH on equi ment?
UJUlrz' GiCalJvp � r- `Y IL` v! `i5/` l-''� ,41` LL:7J
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? E !1 rLr viNrr jU t_-'3 `�•'1
lJ4j O, I s V16 iTrr1G TO C Nt GE~ it/ ,1/Cil, . 5 � / -, -t W i 7�-PIU M 0.c- Ity
-
21. Did Reviewer nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Qnly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any ad idonal roblerns noted whi cause noncompliance of the C rtified AWMP?
Pb5 w i 1—M `fJ D V /g-e4 5 D' , i�'i /- f w Tf Cr(J
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �N0
{des ❑ No
/❑ Yes ((No
❑ Yes/)dNo
❑ Yes O�No
0, No.viailations or. deficiencies. were noted,during thisisit. Y :vou:wi11 receive�no' Airther'
. •correspondence abaci this: visif.� ' � ' ..: , .. ' ... ' ' _ . , . ' . .. . . : ..... . ... r .:.:.: ' : ;
(0Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
WYes ❑ No
❑ Yes Q440
{ A/ t; Ir j2 77i r n c,,,d D •ti r�u c1E X � a v ! Cx S< c�r'E�
L)
'T� friLy
M
d/,-) 1,J157Vz-E-
I jet_ ¢- Pv rt,) 61q4_A.Uc (!� 19Q1Or7-(,A r
7/25/97

Facility Number Date of InspectionL --I 2[i
Time of Inspecliwr 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted 13 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified © Registered [� Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm \ame: Countv:...5../'lG .................................................
.............................................................................................................................. .
Owner Name: ........................................ ..... Phone No:
Facility Contact: ...'Title: ........................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailina, Address: ................ .....q.. r ........... ....................... ............. .........................................................
Onsite Representative:./tr..l.IL..t................................... Integrator ......,................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 1 =.- Longitude • ` �•:
Design Current
,7„a Kir
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Fecder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Layer �(} FO
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ..: :.. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEJ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar^es & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
DischarL,c originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system7 (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
❑ Yes ZVNo
❑ Yes ?No
❑ Yes Z�no
❑ Yes YNo
❑ Yes �N
❑ Yes za",o
P'Yes (:]No
StrUCture 6
identifier: J
Freeboard(inches): .............. ............................ . .................................... ................. 1— .............. .............................................. I .......... I............
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ElYeS o
seepage, etc)
Continued f5?z back

Facility Number — Date of hixpection
..6: Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed anti/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? /Wyes ❑ No
g. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ;;�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? es ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes O-No
] i. Is there evidence of over appliruinn? El Excessive Pondin11 El PAN ❑ Yes o
12. Crop type
I ,. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Wastc Mana-ement Plan (CAW_,VIP)'?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettahle acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre; determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
improvement'?
Is there a lack of adequaic waste application equipment;
Required Records & Doc•urnent.ti
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
18. Does the facility fail to have al: components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design• reaps. ctc.)
19. Does record keeping need unprnvetnem'? (ic/ irrigation. frechnard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicohle sctbuck crircria in effect at the time ordesign?
2 i. Did the Facility fail to have a actively certified operator in chance;'?
22, Fail to timily regional DWQ of emery*ency situations as retuired by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection witli on -site representative?
24Does facility require a fellow -up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP'?
D.Rio viblatiriris:or• deticjernCies •mere nbtet3• iiu•rifig •this;visit:• Y;oi} will•r;eceiye Rio #"urther ; ;
'carres�onc�eh'e. bi kthi' visit.
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes l�fo
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes '01�o
❑ Ycs,.,No
r7lyes
❑ No
❑ Yes
f2/No
Yes0
X
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ Yes
0No
r_X1es
❑ No
❑ Yes
[Z No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations'or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): .
7, c" 01 /ti�. �� rt� �s, 135 Lv'OG� �iO' y ivC--t-
7 -7w T70A,
/fey`:; cad Cvv� YLG9tr C
LJ 7 geP 44, s Td iCm 4 o7l7D t-ITI jE 7"h���v L14 S; rfft j-s.
c-0 p�+J 4 F/eleV 7 7a iUO i t Fy � L-o T cis' -Ore
J
Ta P '1� ��/J✓ �" ,(� �w aT- 2r,o�t
evrewe gspector Narne
Reviewer/fnspector Signature: %.71,e I-r7l-, , Qp
Date: c/

Facility Number: Mate of Inspection /
Qdor Miles
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
?'N�o
.27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'?
Yes
o ,
2&
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt.
❑ Yes
❑�N0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
!/
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the -lagoon?
❑ Yes
��o
30,
Were any major maintenance prOlems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken tan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
7No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins Fail to have appropriate cover?
ElYes
P'No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged bill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑/No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
r T�4� rrr�
SUS rz
r
/i 41G /11 / 9
IV
3/2 3,gc

Facility Number 68 1
Farm Status: ® Registered 0 Applied for Permit
0 Certified ❑ Permitted
of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 1 8/19/97 I
Time of Inspection 1415 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 5.00
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
NotO erational Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: C.axes.Paultrx.F:arm................................................................. ... County: 0ximac .............................................. HRQ............
.....
OwnerName: Mike ........................................ DAY10in ....................................................... Phone No:73.2.-.6.035 ....................................................................
Facility Contact: Mike.ClAyxon................................................. Title: owiaer .................................................. Phone No: W-731-603.5.......................
Mailing Address: G,50.7..Holly-Ridl*-EW.........................................................................ELQtwjV1"ot...NC................................................ . 2.75.72 ..............
Onsite Representative: Mfg..ClaytAft.............................................................. Integrator:
Certified Operator : ................ .................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
oAtltxlp.Qx�lpl ;Ala.;lar �Z.; 9i9; pal,Y,�3i�d d.�: !N ..........................................ers et.ia�tn��1 ....5�4.�N.
i
T
Latitude 36 • ]2 44 Longitude
T e of O erationF
P
gn
c�ty
"�` �`�""gyp'P
Current Design Current
" H
PopWation Po itry 5 E Capacity, ;Population
®Layer 70000 60000
9
Cattle
Design ♦Currentt,iiI4N11W!"�III
" 4h1i1Alrr m #it$i f 5119 1 1SSwine
Capacity Po ulat�on
❑ Wean to Feeder.
-
❑nDairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -La er
❑ Non-DairyE
❑ Farrow to Wean
1
E
••
Total Design Capacity
, 4 total SS 2
T
��
70,000
280,000
❑ Farrow to Fender
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other......
it"�ME `i"�ll g i� Tk'4 it ii 1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area Spray Field Area
Number of La owns / Holdin 1?onds ❑ g ❑ P Y
m�n,%:0 A ualRna n•g �ammvM ICI
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ® Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
0.1
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Continued an hack

In cility umber: 68-1
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
................ I1Q.................. ...................................... ......................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Structure 4
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Annlication
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ® No
t5. Crop type ....................... ftsg e.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes [:]No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Qnly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
12 mowing, livestock exclusion on berm
16 no plan yet
17 unsure on availabel land SWCD calculations pending; may be close
Reviewer/inspector Name
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
E
Li
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

'
!�
1}l
' �! � I�t[�ii' 13'Ei4�ll[Pfiiiii$�i1I1111>1lliHffiffitii3ii14iti131ii)!!:'�"l � ' i4iiiil.�'.Q4�
® Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
0 Division of Water Quality'
�i� �`
1 �li �
i�' "j I E:
4
i 19
a.
4I
i; I: � r..If' W. I : i` w I I I 4, 1 i IIli1 �
Routine 0 Com taint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection 11/18/97
68 1
Time of inspection 11:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ® Registered (3 Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: Dazes.P,aultrx.. ax................................... .. County: Orange..................... .. RRD............
............................................... .......................
Owner Name: Mike..
Facility Contact: ....
CW1011 ...................
Mailing Address: bS.0.7..Ho1lx.liid=.FW......................
Title:
Onsite Representative: Mike.0aytpap..........................
.........................................
Phone No: 732- 035.......................................
Phone No:
1,Z1R=i1A1mi t...NC...............
Integrator:
27572..............
Certified Operator:C.urlis..M.............................. claylam............................................. Operator Certification Number:ZQ8,1Q......................
.......
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 • 12 6 4446 Longitude 79 a 00 1 28 61
k:
Yp p
Type of Operation gg
w
Swine Design
Swine Capacity
Currenf
1?,opulahon
ii nu a
Design ���Current
Poult Capacity Popgfahon
®Layer 70000 60,000
I� M,#I IITM�ilii'li' i7i
DesigWw,n Current ¢
Cattle Capacity Population
....
❑Dairy
Feeder
Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
EFarrow Wean
rr
FFarrow to mshgTtital
___ .... ___
❑ Other »»
___
:
Destgn Capacity
7ota1 SSLW
, !, t �Pii u
70,00U
280 Ol}0
13±i#lil�lllriil44NgkiEilt?lifll44itlltk;l�tl�lf
i iti
y
Number !Lagaans /`Hoid g Pf ends
n1,
� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Fieid Area
Cencral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on hack

Facility Number: 68—t
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding„EQ1lds.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
0.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....................... FgsQu.(;...................... ......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
9. Plans to pump on psture today. +
2. Has not recieved copy of WUP from county yet.
12. Pipe has been dug up. Need to establish vegetation on bare areas. Mow established vegetation. Solids have built up at inflow
pipe's mouth.
r
.I
I Reviewer/inspector Name
IReviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facility Number 6$ 1 Date of Inspection 3/31/98
Time of Inspection 163t} 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ® Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Galtes.Bxoxlxelrs.P.oWtry..Earnut........................ County: Orange .............................................. HRO............
Owner Name: Mike .............................. . cla yl em............................ ......... ........................... Phone No: 7.12.4035 ...............................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: GSQ.T..H aal3:.R.idle,.Rd......................................................................... Rau,Wittruth..NLC...........................................
Onsite Representative: Curils.Calaytoia............................................................ ... Integrator:
..............................................................
Certified Operator:--- ...... I ........ I .......................... ....................................... I ..................... Operator Certification Number:.....,
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 • 12 44 u Longitude 79 • 00 28
2.7.5.7.2..............
Swines€ °
° t
Capaci
Current
o elation.
_ $r�' %1k4 i kMW11l �liWO.4ln
De'sli %�GUrrent" Design Cu'rrerit
Poultiy Ca ace Population Cattle Ca aci . P,o elation,
_
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Layer 60000
60000
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -La er ❑ Non -Dairy
❑Other'ttitnst!itinuutatssm+n.tusttttnttnt
II TotalDe`sigli Capacity
t ltl a1SSL,W
f{rEi;���E,��
, 60,000
240,000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
10 Farrow to Finish
Io Gilts
10 Boars
Numkieroagoo�nsll H d1rig�Pon�dsl�
F
t
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Man a ement S stem 71 NINE } If 111
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes []No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Continued an hack

acility 3 umber: 6Date of Inspection 3131198
8. Are -there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
StrilclurgI (La22onj,Holding Ponds,
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .............0.25............. .................................... ........................ ....... ................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste ARplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......................k'pSguc.................................................................................. ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No'.violatio'ni-or. dertcielicies:were'noted during-A&visi't.-•You will'. receive.no.Wther: -'-
'correspondence, about. this ;visit:: • .:. ::.:.. _ ::
:::.::: .::: .: : ...:::.:....::.::::::.. :
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IS No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
r•""n114W"1 NIPnIPW nnXi1111^IN n4rmn11nlUln Iqr{ '�IlTth'NP'IIVI PUN NXINIINrrurnfMll A�brnlWM jlnll IIIVIUkgNlnnln.0 nrin,"pP�"'NWIWrrin rnli rinnlllll lYr^' • UrINUUII,rYYnrm�yl
Comments (frefer to uestion # Ex lain an Yi;S answersandlor�an'"recomti'endations or an other comments.
i"MIRI1tA k1gARlV'4ki q 01 w1N ��ii�• {flNlfip rlry � A Iliil P1�IIIII�3# Wry ill 1ii111111NYPtlRI 11411t41%4i y y I I I
Use drawings of facility to alA,situa ions. n l"" g1tlonal��iaS�s as neces4a�y): iII1.INYlI iM1YllfuhkHllln:..,[ Nr lPoliYl113f11Tli.�d 511115 Mtl131WlWS .4id6a1l3N9lS lNAilir#IIYiIIIIiI.UdNII n�hlIU1LL�1`rn!l11.11 WWWIIIIIYe6 ,.�IIII....ilYYll kluSlV 11WIW41nIYYIIIIIU..,W14S
eed to remove lightbulbs in lagoon
Dead chickens need to go to composting or other dead disposal method.
58 acres of fescue grazed.
i71 �i"^'lS7Tt,5;tt>Ii ,r MI :i ! �t �1p ; r , i r n 1 n�^^> iYIF �{ �i� I � '' 11 � n � rY r i.,1 1 �1�11f 1'>�r i 4 "13 �i� kll 1j{ n flir
Reviewer/inspector Name Alvarez,'1, 1�4 I !k`V.111I�1l k �j'�,�lli Yi�i�ly€ 1il�«'Illljllll 1 rl,.il��'il,31 i 4y§k�lfl,l3l !,, 11„jir
, L.f#I"i 4S1'lis. ihl'I!Ill1 lil 1. a, ".,l.ar{ tYI
tCharles sf .1 a�lY Y1 II'� 11 . n�lla!_. „} •li _' ..,4. nib r: 1, i1.i4114n=
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number 68 1 Date of Inspection 4/3/98
Time of Inspection 1200 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ® Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: fixes.BxaxlaeKs.Pmu�ItCy.Faa[u�............................................................... County: Or. ui~e.............................................. EtRQ ............
OwnerName: Mike ........................................ Clulan ....................................................... Phone No: 732A.03.5 ....................................................................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address: C,5Q,7..Hojly..l jd=.Rd.....................
Onsite Representative: uu 5, xom...................
Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Ruugeiman t..NC..........................
Integrator: ..........
... 2.7.5.7.2..............
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude = OF
00 28
..;1
Swine ��Capaciopulatton
E:,ig ii
u i�1
P1oultry �$paci
®Layer
Dfi gig° t , -ir en P Design
�iP,opulatioq Cattled t Capac��Po
1 60000 60000 ❑ try
�wc av rent j1
ulation f'
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -La er
�,
❑ -Dal
�
❑Farrow to Wean
�vs4n��u� �n!!mi� an�r Dui n�au�itifwn r
❑ Other
s A l i t� �I
Total !De51gri ��'apacity
�� 1l'�Il�� t� Tolt1�1W
60,000GiltsjBoars
240,000
�ilil
ij!
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
,a ins Present
g 1; ❑ Subsurface Dra❑ Lag ❑ oon Area Spray Field Area
Number of La oons 1 Holdin . Ponds. ] � -
t ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. 1s any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Continued an hack

A
Facility Dumber: 68-1 1 Date of Inspection 1 413198
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lanoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Yes []No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):..............0.33.................................................. ........................................................................................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste
AQplication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
For
Certified or Permitted Facilities Qnly
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
IN No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
® No
No:violationi-or. deficiencies:vvere noted dtiring.this visit.: •You *01 r'eceive:rio'N ther: • : -
..........................................................
•correspondence. about this visit: • . • . • ; • . • , • . • ; • ;
srnmuu••;umr r_.::n � � •rrnut',<r; uar rererti �...... pmrgrwrrm,rrnr emrrn "><Y+rr mun arnrmmr+n.rrm.v��rw�;�rn num mm�lnr nr•• m ruunrnnmur u,
"Comments (rerfer to question) ExplaRn any YES�answers and/or any recommendations or any other camrnentsH
�"fllrSY"'rdR11111rf!'�S ilY� A"'� I' !lIll PII I "'llll I{Ihdl IljllYlm°111"r>S11 "I'Ihu� Itfftlll lG iIIP' ""I"ll1r444Si rAl1LM, 1110. Vol IIIIIAIIImII@IIr Il4lVti tilSr
111]se drawings of all t�bettei• explain situationsus ad�ltionalpages�sitecess�ry�:
IkrgWle wsaAn nwxu ku rliYrinnllRl� xrn,,:nnm rwmnuraw�u�rmit mlwirr�rrAmmn ::,Aa4:..:nnf 4U%WWlMLUM'
freeboard up to 4" with spraying to continue Friday -and Saturday weather permitting.
+
Lagoon wall in good shape witn no signs of seepage.
w
Fnrrr7$FPT'.i.:"�rv�!:frI:SarrS:r. "n3r�r"_z:a,.,,d,�:,,�.�l7If`Itfrr'yi.,it�s, •i,�1,1+-1'1.l1j1^rrf"lt;'lr�r.l.l�^,,��.la��I�I i�, 11.�3i1j]llrAS l�ilr;lYl�;I;ltl..,w_}}lrlccl^i,„,yijIsl"If+!sFinritY"r..!r�llI:rrrrlnlrrt?f�ftr:#l;rf�;l�ii:�riii'IIlI��,dii,;'}iS�El..#i,al ii,.YJ;-'t `:P.nr3'Y�h,ilr;r'lu�l"`lllllr�''!it.'i�il ',. lr�3rrnrrlreReviewer/Inspector Name Charls,Al
41." r :.:i.n?�fi�,r l, i }i,}ill , ":4,I,rI. ,._h.,! "I•�I�" �_nS.g#,I. !! ll�i'nr+1"11y#�t4�•{{n}{{.�
Reviewer/[nspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number 68 1 Date of Inspection 9/21/98
Time of Inspection 12:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ® Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:._.
Farm Name: Galtes.BxolhersToultry--i army ............................................................... County: Orange .............................................. RRO............
OwnerName: Mike ........................................ 0"10ift ....................................................... Phone No: 7324.035 ....................................................................
Facility Contact: ....................... .. Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: ft5.Q.7..Ho113(.lUd=.0......................................................................... Rouge11tRu it..NC................................................... 2.7.5.72 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Mika.Claytun....................................... ....................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.0 r.11S.1!'1:............................... 04YUJI............................................ Operator Certification Number:ZQB3.Q .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 • 12 44 - Longitude 79 • UO 28
lWMCurrent
,
RiAi1S1�:
Capac�
till}rS{
1?o ulatton
Ploultry j
Design
StiiSi{i{w:r [
wUa ci
Meg, rents
LiikiiSUn Nli 44,ii{l�lSw,
Population Cattle Gapact ;Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non-Dai2if
li�
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Layer
❑ Non -Layer
60000
i
?:
El Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder
ttsnnusl::{!lantirttu{{NrnN{{{ens,{
i ❑OtherEl
44 1 ,!
60,000
240,000 �i,
i
-
Farrow to Finish
4
S
t
1� �
1
1, i4
s651��{}�141'�tt�it{41
Total'DesignCapacity
„I�� t � � � � !�
tilts
_ Boars
Number of�L,agoons{/
s l s
11'o ding I?onds
1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
r 4 ❑ No Liquid Waste Mana ement System "i �� i I'PIEll�l{]l
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on hack

i
facility Number: 68-1 Date of Inspection 9121198
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
...................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft):..............L5.8...................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Aooiication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
CO Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
15'. Crop type ...................... Ffessru f........................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
Far Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
N,o:violatioils-or. defi ielicie's:vvere Noted du ng:this visit.; •You4ilf rec' iNe'l o.'f r"the'r:
correspondence; ab0 t this visit.'
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
'❑ Yes ®No
OR Yes ❑ No
IN Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
.•� ,m,wr+m;wn uwwmr .... .....—• renw„wwarvrr�,w,amwxr,'•^• nww rmnwuaart,uu,y.wwvw'xn,..nirnu n'"wrurrt rramnwennurvrmu,l
mments (refer to.ques"�io#.Explain any YES answers andlor any recommendatians Weeny other comments.
rrF�rn,w, m n, nxavmn ,wi lt,t�
q liIm,w"pri1a� W lllldrawln s of�facifity o bexplain gituatio�u
�s.el
all�wunn.., „ ", uw �u au u�a, uiw auuw„u, trwrvu:nunn,uak nxnw umwwniwudwrm,uu , nn,.,,w wm ,PYrnuu++, t�w,.,,i ru,
13. Awaiting pipe installation prior to pumping lagoon down for marker.
16. No copy on site. Will get copy from District this week.
19. Underground pipe system newly installed. Reel should arrive tuesday.
0. DWQ is planning to check new system within this month.
24. Waste sample needs to be taken within 60 days of pumping.
12. Need to keep vegetation on inner and outer slopes at 18 inches of height or less. Clean pool area. Establish grass on
construction area (to allow access for solids removal) to prevent erosion.
18. Weed control needed on pasture.
2. Need to fill out Irr-2 and do nitrogen balance, awaiting WUP.
i
ReviewerllnspectorName Mar garet�O�Keefehl[�lI,,III,;r�1�ll�����ri���r�,���,�.li���Fa�l��;i�,1,�d�1,'i;��s,,,a�tr��:����:�.�1'�tir,.ti..,,���,�f�;,l���r��hlsl,;si���.��„�!,�rl
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation Operation,Review a , ;
s3 .Division of Soil and Water Conservation '.Com liance§Ins' actions
! P r P I t s
Dlvl$ion of f Water Quality s; ronlplll_ance Ilispectionf Oise§ 3 ' S§E! i'q q ° '° 'SS k 4� "IlE'i€q
Q,Other Agency '= Operahoil ReVlaw'i
. --�� . :. •: ,. �..,.>.r �.�.,,��. ,.. �.tFlf • �,<Ad.A �, ,. .r.i�i, . 't. 4r ..E:€:,!� I �W�E, 'a. .:�# ��!
� ♦f St
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 13 Date of Inspection S z7
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ACertifiied © Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .........GA44,..... PT)4995... RedtrTV-11k county: .......... D.e.l�4_GF.............................................
..... ..........................
Owner Name:. ............... Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:........................................
MailingAddress: ......................................................................................................................................................................
Onsitc Representative: p •.... .M,d..��.......�.!►..A:�.T41................................................... Integrator: .........................................................
.............................
Certified Operator: .. Operator Certification Number: Z P 3'0 . .............
Location of Farm:
..........................:{.�i.F-��.....s.rf....! .... it:8.�.............A:3,i,►.......::I:....................................................................................................................................
.................................................. ............. ........................... r
Latitude =, == Longitude � • 1 J�
Design Current
.Capacity
„ . DeigpcattleE
Design Currnt
iySwineCa acit Po ulation'Poult Pn ulation Capacity Population `
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Layer d ' ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy I
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
r:
T6ta1SSLW
Discharr_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11 No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ZNo
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of [he State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes JXNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dices discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes P(No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ZNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?)(Spillway xYes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 _ Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _se,%t.ujA+ t,-JcX"SFP Ly 6` A_RJ.4 TF1yc, 6,tAlia-�,4 A7-
Freeboard (inches): �,u QES Gf1�9 MA1c� A�wr�.. r.!`t'"..`.......................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [-]Yes ['No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes ZINo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;KNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2TNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 'Yes ❑ No
Waste Anulication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ONO
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ElExcessive Ponding ElPAN
❑ Yes INo
12.
Crop type c-k�A 6 "-t gdo
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ONO
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes gNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Cl Yes
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
`oNo
/# Yes eNo.
"❑
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes ONO
Reuuirerl Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
FfNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
P!rNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
PTYes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
P�No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
PrNo
22.
hail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewerfinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
zYes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
.
; i'Vo vi.. ti#ris or dgficie;nctes -Were hoed. atrrifig �his:visit, Y;oir; it1.teev�hre rio fut�ther ;
corresnontderrce: abot:. this :visit: ............. ::::. ...........:::: .
' t tt+'
Use di swings of faciletyEto, better�explatn,situattons use,an, l pages as necessary)q
�•il„ SAtti.Pt t5 AL£ R•r-QQ," AA.IJALL. _ Tie,4,ISFEz_ i 0�P_i6ArT'ba TU-
��glaokAL_0 PJMP A� Soa•d AS Go•�rD�Tr�►ls wr_c, ac..t,a.,�r� c�o•�rTAcs- �A►rt£ S'r�cD 'Tb
,M pX,Z�Jf SPr c�rA� Ta 1A1TVJPC, o P S rGN _ Gd, LL J::oLLD J to rri 3a AAy S 7'0 41€.CI—
V;0OQAev.
Pt.A^r 71 r nfS Tf3Ll. M ��iC-Y'/L fly �L14-G � JA � S P V Mt��•I?CW�1'�.
Reviewer/Inspector Namet tk. t t o�A-
j1v7,b:<.trrP�i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , Date: -�—Zi
3/23/99

k
1
�lIDYd+���o`td
y 7
i
S Ac. _ 67, BBSG4%, .
E
acco0L#-pS

Facility Number 68 1 Date of Inspection 6117199
Time of Inspection 16:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted [3 Certified ® Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 10 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Gaxes.]t3r91bers.PAW1ry..>k?arM....................................................... County:Oramge .............................................. RRQ............
Owner Name: Mike ........................................ Clalort................... ................ I................... Phone No: 731-6.03S ...............
Facility Contact: ................................................................... .... Title Phone No:
........................................................................
Mailing Address: 65.0.7..HoiiY..H.id=.Rd..........................................................
Onsite Representative: Mike-Claytnn....................................................
Certified Operator:Cuu:tlS.M ............................... Claytall...............................
.............
Location of Farm:
Ragemorxt-Kc...............
2.7.5.7.2..............
Integrator: ..................................................................
Operator Certification Number:2,093.Q.........
Latitude 36 ' 12 4 44 Longitude 79 ' 00 4 2864
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): i. ..............................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iei trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on back

3
Facility Number: 68-1 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0; No-vibla'tions:oi` deficiencies'w"ere noted' during•this visit:• :You:vi�i� i�eceive•no•further
...........................................................
• ' • ' correspondence about- this -visit. ' . ... ... ... ... ... . .
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
4) Approximately 4.2 inches of rain reported by producer over last two days. A6
This lagoon must be pumped immediately and maintained with adequate freeboard. Some concerns that only receiving crop is
Fescue, which is not suitable for waste applications during July and August.
7) Spillway must be improved when freeboard problem is resolved. Dirt added must be removed. Orange SWCD advised of this
modification and must be consulted when reestablishing true functional shape of this spillway.
3) Sludge removed from lagoon and litter cleaned from houses (one pile approximately 150 feet from currently flowing ditch) must
)e removed. If a discharge occurs then operator is subject to a violation.
19) Recommend layout application records by pulls as discussed. Take waste sample for analysis for current applications.
1�
lT N.,?H"�1u11'�n;l t�: 1' , n:r9 i.! it a1�1I;!I#.�a"h-1: i,41`�.: ii 1�i��i iil, .'. �i4'' .. ;E,' - ., 11",l:��i �al.i l�G!o .iS .-: �I�ef.i. R�'4�.�1Iwl!�;: �1 lid ;l5iy,l. �"lii•r`kl.!.f?�[!iit.'.i ! �1l'l 'gill •r' iI ,,<1��1� �sS1� 4,117
1 .a ii7'�.0ii7sr1
Reviewer/Inspector Name JnVl Fllti��l�, I�Ar'��j l�i1�""�s,iIl,kTlulIi,lReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number: 68-1 Date of Inspection 6/21/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with,required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste AnWication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No •iriolati6n's'or dircie'nciei •were , noted dd iih -this. visit:• :You "w' iU, re'ceive•no' •further• . • . •
- , corresUolndence about this visit. ' : • :.. • : • : • :.: • :.: • : .:.:: .:. ... ..:. ° .. ... ... .:. • .
t) Lagoon liquid level - 4.3 feet Hand level readings
low spot is fill - 3.9 feet
.soil added into spillway)
owest spot in spillway - 4.35 feet,
dust behind filled soil)
-REEBOARD is higher than spillway since there is fill in the spillway.
RUST PUMP IMMEDIATELY to lower the level of the lagoon at least 7 inches below the original spillway elevation.
Reviewer/Inspector NamenINHunt',;��E'��ii' �4',ll�',;, �i.lk�ii�iis"Cti'arles Alva'rezl;��lll;1.�i;lyyl;i;{i�llilli��;11"iii' ��i!7',ii
i f 1,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

CAWMP Components
ermitted Facility; Date;
Completed Certification Form; Date: 12rz 3 I %? 7
Qjli4Lt�w`t+t � Wray r.� f1�ai
l' Waste Utilization Plan; Date: ?
l Amount of plant available nitrogen producedlused annually lbs)
^� Dominant soil series: 14 r ar dv t-
`� Crops to be grown: f�sr_U.,F_i G"zEc) 118CD� 6 r3S
Field Maps
Based on usable (Total= Usable= }
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1/93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1197)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1/97)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1197)
Type of irrigati raveling Gu olid-Set Small Gun Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 911/96) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 9/1196) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Snow design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2/96 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection &'observation trench (after
9/1196 )
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21/96)
REQU RED RECORDS effective 9/1 /96 PERMITTED FACILITIES
Waste application records (IRR 1 &2) General Permit & COC on site
Annual soil sample reports for 1999 weekly lagoon level records
(Cu index: }
(Zn index: }
Waste analysis - date last taken 31 rq
14, it PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for structur #1
PAN ibs11000 gals. for structure #2

FACILITY NUMBER
FARM NAME:
REVIEWER:
DATE:
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON -PAN
POND - PAN
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGNIVOLUME CALCULATIONS:
Top of dike elevation:
Elev. below structural & storm storage:
Normal operating water level elevation:
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation:
Permanent storage volume ft3
Temporary storage volume ft3
IRRIGATION:
Operating Pressure (psi)
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr)
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design.
Design
Design
Design
WUP - Days of temporary storage:
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:
ft. 15' 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
ft. 2' 25 yr.124 hr, storm in.
ft. Structural freeboard in.
"t
Exceeds required volume?
Exceeds required volume?
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

i
•. , i �'s DiVlsion of Soil and,WaterE Conservkation° '.Operation
[3. Division of Soil and WateeConsetrvation ,Com liinc'e Ins ectiein
,�Mivision of Water ality ,Compliance'Inspection ' ,>
.: , ak k5 - - t �„ ; H r , ,_,.,fit F tyr' k fi S
i
[3 Other Agency. Operation"Review ,, , t f 4r ,
O Routine Q Com lai nj__W Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-u of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection Io t7
Time of Inspection I I : 4>'vw24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted,Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 .Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: C,a DES �tCoh�3 �.f[—S. f oULF► County:.......1Jr?..............................................
.................
OwnerName: ................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:..............................................................., Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ........................ ......
Onsite Representative:..... 1!�.tl.,,F......r ....... Integraton
Certified Operator: ................... ... Operator Certification Number:
....................................................................................................................................
Location of Farm:
............................ ............... ................. ............................................................ ..... .... 7
Latitude =::] 0 6 .4 Longitude = 6 =1 =11
'.AlDesigny Current CDepsrgny r Cp rrent Capacity Population
Current
Swine„ i13Ca acrt Po ulation Poultry a act "Po elation" , Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons .it
h 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
�"
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps i , ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imuacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑'No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑'No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Watcr of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes XNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If es, notify DW ) ❑ Yes J Vr-No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 9(Yes o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Iks
pillway X'Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure. 6
Identifier: I
Freeboard(inches):...............................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ YesAonb�acok
seepage, etc.)3/23149 Confinue

' Facility Number: Daty of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
/-7
❑ Yes 0 No
9(Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ZNo
9Yes 9Io
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
� 04a'tiQiis :or• defieier�cte5 ,were jnpted• dt tifig phis; visit: • Y:oix Wif i •r. eeOiye tiq Uurtiit e
... ..... ....
cotrres�onc�ence. about this :visit.
�Comnieiits (ire
iUs'e drawings
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
A Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�) APeFZoX_ Lf. ZFA�nI �P Jr a�S' Z bA<tS . rd-j LA6oaj MUST e'L ?,,MfED tmmeo%,4!L.
Ar.P r6AJn!TAiWCZ cj?rk AbT-QvArr_ 1F4£V_6oA9-0_ Ct^C Co.fcE/f_4Y-1+A�
��G �✓r'.•ICG c P �S �SLk� w��G� 1s n/oT sun`Tagt..E �ra� wA-ST i;OFL;CAr,,„r
DJC ZWCr- JuLy �1i+LD AkG uri'
} s f t L-L a A y Ie n kr T 8 t rti P� O u� f -� Acz—� Pic of3 L� ��SaLVi.9
JA4ou� APPL.+c.. IF-Fc &VS Q `4 f%AU,9 AS �jSC6'S5 S
EQ, AB c.lpSEV-1
SWOC-ir_ A,40 I-'4r9-9- CLXAJ Our- MkST SE� ?_fMoO;L.O . tP D%' cC44Aa'-6i= 6CC-A6L-5 StA41€_C_T
Reviewer/Ins ector Named �; �p tt''- ���'�� I p 'I ` i io�"' 31 =a ; 1;1l hav 7 yr
�] i i "r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ' Date: L„ A -7 f 4cz
r
may{ C 2-L x Z }_ 3 )l � (Soy � '- . _ �'�.�. 3/23199

Division of Soil 8nd�WAt@r, CDI15BrV8t10n QperatiOnl RBV7C4V 1 � ! r s & f S 4e
� 11 .� � ',•�i�'��,' � - �.. 3 I ,
aft Division of Soii and Water tyollSerWatlon >Co� fiance �115 ectlOAt
lV, _ P P
ivision Of Water Qnahty CoR olih lnce inspecttOn Y ,11
E JF-IF a . pru " y teher Aency.eratloRvjew n s ! yY xi I �iF �xc'}f�ell
0 Routine Q Com taint ollow-up of DW2 inspection Q Follow-u of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number (a Date of Inspection I f. L,
Time of Inspection 1 1:7 . 4 S1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
PrPermitted.4 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........ r !A� �.... Rom ER- 5................................ County:...... a. A 4C.. �.................................................
.... ...............................
OwnerName: ...............................................,..................,.................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact .. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ..................................................:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: .... �. ...... {..A,,. ..1Z? , ...... Integrator:
Certified Operator;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .............. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
............. ............................. ................ ................. ............................ ....... ..................... ...........
Latitude ' 6 i4 Longitude • 6 61
L
Numbero', oons `',P ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
4golding PAds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -
0
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'! ElYes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dices discharge bypass a lagoon system? (li-yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 4 Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
it
Freeboard(inches): ............0............................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
...............................
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re aired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
10 yi, A itiris:or• deficienc4es .were noted dSrrtng �his:visit: • Y:oit wiil•reeeiye iia ffifthOF • . -
ct rres• 6fid6ce:ab' 'fthis'visit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
y, Lpsoo.4 4.3 _rotAS IS G'XgKMe_ '`
j Lo.r sear t4 Ir-I Lt- T-044 Se U-0AJ _6dA C. jIS A&r6gT--V'6
I-o,J Seal- tw &FOLLwA'1 �f_3S � Imtt'r PVMP 1MMI�DiA--reLll To LOW
`yus� 3Eaair�t� j-'i'LI�D ��L id�� ER 1.vEL
LCASr 1 i�cNF� igF_t-�W V�.+�;,�A� sP��LL�.rAy
QScAD;nIGS lELtzt/.4TiJ,�/�
Mu S I Sr'4_5 E O fr ` PAD ArVPd_SF"
Reviewer/Inspector Name i 1 ,J'al� �# a��f . , � Vw'. i� I �
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Z t cf— Date: 1, R9
3/23/99

Facility Number 68 Date of Inspection 2/23/2000
., ....� , . ------- Time of Inspection 16:3U 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered 113 Not O erationai Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: lwaxes.l3xaxbers.P.auh�y..Fax[n�........................................................ ... County: Oxnge .............................................. RRO............
OwnerName: Mike. ........................................ CL to.0.........................I............................. Phone No: {91Q�.2�z. �tQ�S........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 65Q.7..Hotly..)R.id=.RQMd.................................................................... Ruu=lmaat..NC........ ........................................... Z.7512 ..............
Onsite Representative:J.!')Cilse..ClaxtAta.............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Cuxtis.0 ............................... Claytan.......... .................................. Operator Certification Number:ZQ830.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 ' 12 44 Longitude 79 • 00 28 u
ren-t esi
.�.•-i�a D4
.Y fit:IYCesgngn
.sutn�t t�� ,.eN.1s.;i.,g. 'Cvt,u.
'Pohl CcP0 ulation to
Wean to Feeder
"
er 60000'. ❑Dairy
;..
eeder to Finish z�
R
ErOINon-LaverEl i", ❑Non Non -Dairy
;j Farrow to Wean
n-,'a�^A�.E.x.. �^✓l..w }y; .-:)-��r3.Y::.,. .t..: --;liz�„Kdh1 lP 3
ax;
❑ Farrow to Feeder{
❑Other'"x`'l's
"h ?
Farrow to Finish
f
' w �,,. A, ti�� ";�,
� Total Design Capacity 60,000
..- Giltsa,
r _
`a 'ty
BoarsP�..ry;
To#'SSLW 240 000
alA
Number of Lagoons,�(�
❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
'}..
�,
i Solid Traps
.. ... ..
❑ No Li Waste Management S
„k+ rr ar m 4;
'�
*; Floldlog Ponda
H tiA
uld stem
�? qK t ,
csp charges & Stream ImpmIj
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ® Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. Xdischarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes ❑ No
c.. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? <1
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) s ® Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) ..Q................... ..... .......................................................................... ....................................
.......................................................... ......... ..........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
n..i..♦..A .... n+n�+nnnn

C 1 Intru Utz CjLµj eUUV
Facility Number: 65-1 Date of Inspection 2/23/2000
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [—]Yes ❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Aunlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reauired Records & Documents '
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
. ; No violations.ox iieticknUes •were noted ui r' iitg taus: v sit1­1.:Yo t:viill receive >no fuxtber
correspondence about. this visit. :: . .. .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
1) Discharge still occurring from lagoon at spill way. He has had trouble getting pump repaired thus has not applied but only one
ihort pull of reel indicated. Flow was hardly perceptable, but movement could be detected in liquid through spill way.
Photographed from spillway all the way to the discharge point at the intermittent stream.
t) Freeboard remains at `artificially' high level.
16) Mike showed turbine nozzle that was damaged and subsequently replaced. Had just completed repairs and thus in process of
preparing for application this evening. Previous repair indicated to be insufficient to operate equipment.
19) Only one short pull completed but Mike stated that he would fax the records to inspector the next morning. He said he had the
Fax number.
11]\ TL..-- 1___ t.--_ ­_i=__.____ _r :......LY`...:..-.s f_....L....—.3 •L.......`L .___. at:.. "L'_
�,� ,gYn+��rr."�'T! ,�,cv �rr ;•�� a�-�q, �dv�, -^;q�.'�..,�- ,Y�x.,�':• �:y,^��;�'� ,�_tra:�r

Farm Name: ........� a!a. rE.S...... '.. .J'.. ...... a �......
OwnerName:...........................................................................................................................
County:..........0 ! ................
PhoneNo: ............................................. .....................................
FacilityContact: ... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: 1::.+...................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator:.................................................:.............................................I................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
i
.......... ............... ............. ... .............. .. ..Aver. ...........
Latitude �'�� �•� Longitude �• �` 0"
Design • Current
Swine Canacitv - Ponulatiori
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current ` :.' .' Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity' Population
Layer a ❑ Dairy
❑ on -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I
Total Design. Capacity-,
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoon / ❑ Spray
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ S ra Field Area
Holdin Ponds / Soli&Tra s No Liquid Waste Management System
_
g .....:. P, ❑ q g y
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: Lagoon [ISpray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is bserved, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes XNo
b. If discharge is observed, did ii reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in pal/min? J� L
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if ycs, notify DWQ) ® Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? / `Yes El No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?ASpillway lwyes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
LL Identifier: `+oard (inches): .................0 ......................................................................................................................................................................................
,ere any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
a9
Continued on back

Facility Number: �, — Date of Inspection Z 2 3
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
&. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Document,;
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑Yes
El No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
'
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection'with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
El. 1a viola(iQtis:or deficiencies •rv�re pt�tef . pr'in t:ttis'visjt' • ;Y:op wiii•;eb�i*i6 d fut�th�T
caries oricience: abotat: this Isit: .. .
2:.. r y `f q - r - i- - - . 7 :ai«n "rT'� �:- xT+�:r'x;" ^`-� � s...•.. ..`, :,�:},d .r�;_: r�-v � � e.w c 1- aF �� n a77�.�s� �1 r•�1y � • .�
arvmgs of factEtty to b'etter:explatn srtuatlons (use additional pages as necessary) ,.,ti�r�,���t rr , ����,�' ������"�v��'
{ AGoo� C�anl r;�Jd�S T_% ,pilcr�f,� �►.u.s CnvMo Q D�'stEcr�cO $s';^'SJt3s,rap.i�;nuy r.e5$ �A+thi AL
brI*� GAL(..�nt' P�,�Mi•f�tTE� V62y AE-F•• c_o PdrIA wfiy ro _jrk_4•u,rT£.fr
�11�r�s OF pidGhlr*t C>&_ Aaa
We y or ra.Iy Acet_�cn, �,� x fc �S 1,4 ;�E�,. Sao . �"a ��: Akc�
ozzc-g, , Tug ?t eEL Fr- ,'L 4,40 ros r�
WAS JAJA03C.E. D AM.'? W#).iMS, 14E Flns jNU1);UEo `E4,1Ynv_,4r k4u CIE SunAko AONP .l44G-wAcrr-S
Reviewer/Inspector Name 7I':` r ``' : _• `.•. ` Y4"
Reviewer/inspector Signature: �,,..�. Date: j3

«. �.. a' p
Dlvlslon of $oil and Water, Co'nservadon Oera
%.[]'Dlvlslonrof Soil and Water,Conseryahon ;Compliance Inspection` i�ul3 +�i 1 1 a
.y � �' •' `�� 1Y151on�of,WateC QUAlltj'' ,Compliance,Inspectlon , I t" i,� a t�r,'� �J,S�� ���al� 5���w.�''�""���f K 1`�}' �� ��:
Other,Agei44* OpelPatlonl
Q Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Ja Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 9.7 a.
Time of Inspection t Z ,_cra 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Kpermitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: !;�.Ams. atl.a 5 . P 10 Vl� County: ......A.!�!4. �
....... ...I........ ...........................
OwnerName:................................................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:.................. .............................. Phone No:
MailingAddress..................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: .... sk� C-^' Integrator:
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
r
........................... :. ..... .... ...... ......... ...... .... .... IV
Latitude 0 & « Longitude 0 ° 46
Design`; . .Current- Design Current ' Destgn,; Current
Swine Ca aci : i Po elation . Poultry Ca acit , Po elation Cattle ' Ca 3aci `'' Po "elation
❑ Wean to Feeder 10jayer ,f�,o-oQn 'fS6ov ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I ❑ Non -Dairy I
" ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow (o Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total ;Design.tapacity ,
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW;.:,
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
' ,t
Holding Pond`s / Solid Traps , ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
D_ischaEg!js & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ,Yes ❑ No
Discharge ori:tinated at: ❑ Lagoon Spray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (II' yes, notify DWQ) j ycs ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? G j
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system" (If yes, notify DWQ) Ryes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than•from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway 1Yes El
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identi f ier: L�X S s �; �4 W, ;Lr
tt'' vt �aa
Freeboard (inches): �? V..�:....... �... .r �4............................. ................. V a ........... ..ak L� 8 *�t1 Q
5. Are there any immediatd threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

•7
(Facility Number: L% — j I Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not•properly addressed and/or managed through a waste,management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate publie.health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AnnlieatiOn
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
3
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
33oa
•
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This "facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? • ) f ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yigla igris;oar d hi e.. ... r. 0re pgte�l dpr;ing his•v�sJ Yoh :w'i -0:004 too; #'u>G•tW
rorresponrience. abaut. this .visit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes tZ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
-E . I i .hlx li! till .I '10" k�'!t Uri Si•.->� 3.' . 3's.+dr -{t i . k, .f - 4nil'i i _! E.E-.. Jle:6
y A. 6 +oo rl �(q S Bs wM ., �rd d�P�k Nt =•'ice �� Sk k �6� i �l c l-4 �-1 S Et.ew 1V a iz*ZlL £ ta_
T� E9'_L-f- w—`A _ 1 y, Ycp bi �o 3 P Erk.• J �D r �fJ'�A '— 5� �D
4Ttt 3 RUc�,�yS a S'aLti',vsa�Lo taAuL�p
'ram STA G �— j1 r �i AID �6E_ , L,+� p. P11.E. 4145 �6c•.i 4-�F^ O��L?
A410 Z Q-FE.j_j «a0t r�*A NST_
1Ntw 4 PE_ S-Q.,JT' Ar i�EA� wAPr�wT a� Jn++1+-t`
Jpo� '4LE 9isCOA0-Q L pai,M A$..le. 6ao.".Fa AL._ 4,QE. 6 ►IfR sr . er-r, 30, ripe- sec 4`OrjS
p�,i� Mats LorjXSr pa,,/T. ptf"&S M LIAJL LFAr- 6�
T_ez-4 -? fE AY 1 tl; 4%1k. APrcAI� 'T� SL, Lo J 9
4 Awr + � . r �t gAY c-ou L. p V<AW A u. S E.c--V O f4 -5,
I.C
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /}�(,,,�. ,�„ „�-�— Date: �f*3
AL

i
r

P '
■I� ��E. 41 I i 1 ���'UN
��E
yy �P
Routine
Follow-uo of
Follow-uv of DSWC review 0-Other
Facility Number $ Date of Inspection 1 as
Time of Inspection 3 -= o 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Q Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
FarmName:............................................................................................................... County:.............�....j4d^ ?J�7.................... .......................
Owner Name ............................. ..... Phone No: 3 Z 6'�
FacilityContact: ...:f:..... C ... tY r................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ,rQ T S.nG �t P��tT�"� .I...... Integrator:
.............. ........................................................................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................. :............ .................. ............... ................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
....... ......... ....... ................ .. ........... .................. ......... ....
Latitude =•=' =" Longitude 0 =' =11
Design Current
.Swine Capacity.Po ulatio>i
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
�`' ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
€ E
Number`of Lagoons `
1 ,,r
'Holding Ponds /, Solid Traps '
Design Current 'Da epsaicgtn: p'oCu.r.
rent
Poultry Capacity.Po elation Cattle Cula'tion
Layer ❑ Dairy
Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy i
1
❑ Other
Total Design,.Capacity::
Total SSLW'=
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ;
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: Atagbon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............�}
.....................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
)(Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
*No
Yes
❑ No
Z GPr1
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
kYes ❑ No
Structure 6
Yes ❑ No
Continued on back
3/23/99

" Facility Number: •(j8 — Date of Inspection
jtv. kre there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yiQlA igrjs.op .. fjcie dii g *06a noted• O(tr i ft �hls'visit: • Y:o t will tee K. 1Jo furthgf ;
correspondence. about: this visit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
se drawings oftfactLty to better explain s�tuak�ons (use'add�ttonalE,pages aslnecessary)
Nt, j 04, MttST E x.!r- -tAAF—, .PL,,%,s T-0 GC-T T•bjF-- 1r%6aWL-3 D-,J,sl W ;- -riJ; �t+ ouV.s
�r A,5 MutIS or— TAF- �n! Fad �io.� O,f rN� 1 nIC��S� pl�A^f 7}dA'r- ,/au CAW /oie+i,IrD�.._
D W Q &`1 C# n1 A •?os _,T: o.•i TO 34— FW-CEP To S> A4 ra �t,�a� o „� To R EM o v E
1fWr,'L T41, s �'W5Ul" � �s . Uo�Ec_5 . CALL- '�1~. �00.,1 1a� �oow
&JAVV_ Arty Cif �r-OAS _
Reviewer/Inspector Name �. J� Tr[iy { f "14
' ts; t „`{ i 1 TI "' 13
N_ . ,'...::,3,C�, ;4 ! .:b'1'Q .77,.p, l9�tf, c.A: ,, 57/=70o fx ;zS3,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - u,.7t- VV Date: Z 11141 Fp

j{a Q;DIv15lDn"a1'Soil and Water^Conser+ahon Ope'ration`Review
f i- 7 : y
e; O Division of Soil and,Water,ConservataDn Compliance Inspecuon t> + I,
_ a b js s«
Division of Water aft ='Com Hance Ins ect<Da tr�
Other'A enc O¢ n tAonRevtew �
? �•. �✓ �,. N Ii J ` 1' "SSF� ¢ L,r
Routine 0 Com laiint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review laOther
Facility Number ti Date of Inspection y- a�
Time of Inspection Z ' `f S 24 hr. (hh:mm)
APermitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Q Not Ope-ra—t—io—n—all Date Last Operated: „......•„............•..
Farm Name: A 6 eaS_ Po J L� County: ........ 0 �= i° WA.0
....................................................�.........................................
OwnerName:................................................................................................................ .. Phone No:.............................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:...................................................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:....!. tit-..0 fix. Tbn/•....................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
...... ......... ...... ............ .............. .... .. ....
Latitude 0 G 64 Longitude 0 4 "
Design Current. Design Current ,.!Design Current
Swine Capacity,. Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle,,,, ;Ca aci Po` ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer $ 6Jp ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JCI Non -Layer 1E] Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity',
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total 'SSLW ;.
Number.of'Lagoons , .❑ ' Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area i
Holding Ponds / Sohd�Traps;t°? ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ?
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes kNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? KYes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway �] Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: /?
Freeboard (inches): ....... Is. .. .,t.�.............!........... ..... w d ca!'. d .... �.f x....
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of a4 of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Vacility Number: — I Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
� 41ati' ris'o�- ciofcaendi $ # re potted- ft-rft Ojs'vpspt; X64 will-tooiye 06 fufthor -
corres�oridence' about- this visit..
dray
j Ai. k#_.F_ "AS'rc 4 AP 'EJT<- eo TrUF_ 1?Q �3r3�a�] Spy LL c.r�ti
w R 5 a d S 4 TC a feLq : •S 6 ?!J -A $ �r1i�s �E. 3`o Tot V_ r i EL-+P
pt .� A PP &�-I 3r1 ACI ,E $r gFA�c� �rs a�r AAgoys ra>✓O, I A4�c� 3 . .I c �Y cg
�E S 0�-� -rn 1 irJ vnlC9' 1 Nt%r-E SC+LE,r
AL.Cn Tra p�mE. avG?'kL. AD LE•1E1
TaMop¢pv1 (err �Nor.ti.0 c-vtFi4wr� 3`� r+� 5�1+��r: o� S-,p &Q_E_ TAK-44 Q. .aa1 frATE,4
u.1�cc ssrau+k Ac.� a,J. SQm� Alter: c s r�-&t'jZe_ rr ofr St'
JDE 9-CM QT's i-7A
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes *0
❑ Yes ,'rr❑��N-'~o
❑ Yes ❑ No
I.--7Lf
4"3$
5,16 f
g.EWJG
®€a
Reviewer/Inspector Names {J v h-•� �]I,V1t�/b- �� ffJZ �� l�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,,�j guU„4�SBtc.d,i? Date: 3 y cZM

Facility Number:®— Date of Inspection 3 Oo
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
4� �aEe B� eaa o rJa�J� CEtI>�t. aD c AvrS .T S r;Jc s Utzxr-LP-')o
Tt_u� 5t �t�W A� �AS irJ F}: CEO c13� .+4C�c i d6 FAA m` (:� e-.A,JGE-s"z
3/23/99

-!s; e ...:.i' , € . Ol ... I I , *` .- . t..: -, [.€ i .. :i'4'. .:,. i 3 -:...! I.: T.t �, I °l?� F HIfIY. ! 11... 1 F h:i. 1. z...:L 1 3_ 11 , 34;.=' - ..L 111I 1 11
Q Routine O Cam laint Q Follow-up of DW2 inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 1 3 8 1 O-o
Time of Inspection o 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not OperationalOperationall Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........... 647.J—;S �T4971 ...p�.W.l�..�`. ...... County: A�..k1. _. ................
............................. .... .............. ..........................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ......................................................... ............... Title: Phone No:
MailingAddress: ...................................... I ................. .................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: „ !,J iL... I . Integrator:
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... .................................................. 1­1 ...... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm.,
........... .... ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
........ ......... ....... ........... .......... ..... .. w
Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design !Current
Swine 'Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population.' 'Cattle :.:-Capacity:''Po elation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
IN Layer 1 JEI Dairy
Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
t
Total Design Capacltyu
Tata SSL Wi
Number'of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area ',';!.,
Holding Pond's / Solid Traps ` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
s
Discharges & Stream Im_mpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 4No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑,Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? IM Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Wes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage'capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes IxNo
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): p....................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
3 w
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Document,;
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yi. .... ...... r�cie5 rv�re note$ �l>ari tg tl�ls:visit; Yoh wi�� �ee�iye trio fu>!•th+ r: :
icorrespondence: about: this visit. ' '
Comments (refer'I;to guesfaoiil'#): Expla�nla
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�: !_• ,Fr .F '}, f C:. :. dt➢,I, fr ,li �,.4„xFx ,:a1
Z� Pcrntd* I-JAS 73CE4 PUMtPCO TO MA)r'_MvM -bE.PTA ?'�sSi9t�._ f APPt.iE'o 46 A► clo-cv-4' C,'C.D �
5t..o.a L� F�tl,'�3r,-- Sty AA, Q£Le,,,,l SE2PtS Tth 6E_ CLEAQ i Jir S�^.E_ S"AU— MEAD q ►tl 4k
r-ecr,o,--4taaA:> Peas o
.,,o _ b -7" BE(,raw � � C�.h%Ay . >nt+t�s- ca,lr'�Jv,'rJ'U '1-u �Jr►+ P `�� l,,a wGe..
-r,,•E157 f-t'aU;D Le E-L
3i gnat=1� ►ifnlG L� -FR-A.S� -s�� 96r ee- Pi L2,S o' 't - BL moJV-D To a7nG '-Gt~ 4; soaJ AS G2Uj4c)
GotJa, T%orJS w:Lt� ALWI,J F1,1 �6iJ ptrrJr TnA-FF�t. �1cc�P-Q r�Cr Ta rA VQ3 2)A45
PName st �%„ Ii i v1E" Reviewer/Inspector /� f t �, t
.'.�
Reviewer/Ins ector Signature: _ ,� { Date:

ii
Division of Soil and.Water Conservation .Operation Review -,' �� , , 4 ?'+ i§
C] Division of Soil and; Water Conservation ,Compliance Inspection
t i y4.. .... 4 , s ! f
h4sion of Water Quaillty! EC�iap lance Iusplectlont
er Agency Oper d ' ' ReV1eW A
3s
tli'" g y-1A,
v,
0 Routine OComjplaint 0 Follow-u of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 'L 7
Time of Inspection 3 as 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted © Certified - 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..........M + �A.d..... (county:........ G .......................
- ......... Y'*.................................................................".J.
........��'.......................
OwnerName: ................................................... ................................................... Phone No:
............................................................................................................
y
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:....ar►Ore......................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: �'�t lr LL i�Cs�.....................................................................................
.....................................A::�4...........,.............................,.................. Integrator: ,
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
............................i. ... ^^-...... nn...... ...,... ..... '"....... `i°.i....5.7.................................................... .,.,.......... ..................... A
.................................. .. ............. .............. ........................................................ ...........................................................
Latitude 0 4 4 Longitude • ' 69
Design CurrentDesign Current' Design Current
wine,,'Capacity Population, oultry ' Ca acit , .Po' elation;. Cattle Capacity; Po ulation ' l
❑ Wean to Feeder Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish '' ❑ on -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish affh i i i €;,`. ; 9'I'Total DC3111 CapaCtty
❑ Gilts,
,
!
❑ Boars
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons.. ; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La�unn Area ❑ Spray Field Area
�;
Holding'Ponds�lSoLd'Traps �', ' � ,'; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischargis & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes *No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes; notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? C 11 GPM -
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 1<lYes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �irNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment kpillway
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? t ❑ Yes ElNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............0.................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: (a — Date of Inspection Z
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes A
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,.noti€y DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
r
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? e
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? V
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re uir•ed Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?'Q
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No.yiolafidtis.or deficiencies v�re poled• hitting this.v. sit* • Y;ou will-teogiye pq furthef
CO es ondence. ab' 'f this visit.
mments (refer'to,,question #) 3 Expiatn �
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
-7 .7
LA 4>+SCe•IAe_c..'4(p T� Ort.T'I aQC Pe4rA, fit'
Cson[1'p �Je-4b (.� c�� N/ MSC T T IJ i1S d' IQT� J Qi47'<� f�'i ELJS f�LO
,L`i41�P�r..o Ar T;`1+ ` a✓S�. Z.-So vo FM1+w` r�� hr� I p.r` vV
N1i F.f. t �t_E.Atl� C.A,t.1. ME. AS ��a1 pi ��S,t' i 6LF n
-Far- . S tte-V- D L : rcR.- CUES D a` VQ� 4 L Co ^Ir+g r rJr'M A 7ED kJ nf'vF� �GJ r`•�/{r 1 �I. o or�.'A/(
�tlA-f4F+5 Sa+KPt,t A1cr -"A A I; oE_. At' Fw,w 1111(7 sr"4 _ - .
- t ' ! i 1j - q•.W..:r n -q�Si -1 i.''tl
p � I
Reviewer/Inspector Name +� 4 t y s9 3 .� ',�, i _ ,iI_V `. .. i ��`��i�.�lh �t+�,: ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G621VI Date:
3/23/99

IISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGENIEN'1' WATER QUALITY FIELDA.Ali PO1{t•1__-.--
IrrrY i1A -,J 6 C— PRIORITY
ORT TO: ARO FRO M{R(lRO aRO MUD WSRO TS ❑AMIIIENT ❑
QA
r�-.
De!
iM COMPLIANCE ❑
CHAIN
I-1 !_ANF
❑EMERGENCY
OF CUSTODY
❑ESTUAHY
P.E�1TE
ped by. Bus Courier, StalF Other
;' _E
LECTOR(SY G t•.(.-•f f'j 11rrT
STATION LOCATION:
:Vk r (rE
C_-L r"' tj TO
mated DOD Range. 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus — —�
—
!: Yes ❑ No El Chlorinated: Yes El No REMARKS:
SOU
lon f/
Date Begin (yy/mm/ddj
Time Beg1n
Date End
Time End
Depth DM1S III!DI1M11
Value Type
Composite
Sample Type
OZ O� i.J
/y c��
Uz- �3`2 tj �
i `�=11
A li L
T i S 1;
C GNxl;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l Ij
11
12
13
14
l5
16
17
18
19
20
DOD5 310 mg/l
COD High 340 mg/1
COD Lour 335 mg/i
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /loom]
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 lloonil
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loo"Il
Residue: Total 500 mg/l
Volatile 505 mg/l
Fixed 510 mg/i
Residue: Suspended 530 ma/l
Volatile 535 3119/1
Fixed 540 mg/l
pli 403 units
Acidity to pi 4.5 436 Ina/1
Acidity to pil 8-3 435 mg/I
-
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
Alkalinity to pil 4.5 410 mg/I
TOC 680 mg/l
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/l
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/l
Chl a: Corr 32209 ugll
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/l
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(p11 } 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM1
Cyanide 720 my/l
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 m2A
Specific Cond_ 95 2
uMltos/r.m
_
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 roil/]
,+
NH3 as N 610
mg/l
TRN as N 625
mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as"N 630
ma/I
P: Tula) as P 665
"In all
PO4 as P 70507
`ma/I
P: Dissolved as P 666
i
mg/l
77
Cd-Cadmittm 1027 .
1e9/1
Cr-ChromlumlTotai 1034
u!1A
CuCoiper 1042
ug/l
Ni.-Nickel 1067
ug/[
-Ln-ZlIIC 1092 ---
Li-Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/l
hin-M1langanese 1055 ua/!
Na-Sodium 929 mall
rVrse,ric:Total 1002 u9/1
Se -Selenium 11.17 ,Ig/l
Hg-Mercun/ 71900 ug/I
Ora �:chfnrir._ Cc:fes
fvlt7:g^•.
,'rr• :n:;aRstici.!:•s
tplina PuinlX
Conductance at 25 C
94
Waler Tem1wrature (M
10
D•O, n!g/1
300 •
Cloud Cover %
32
p1[
40) •
Wind Direction (Deg}
36
Alle:rlini{y
141 8.3 1'! 1 4.5
82244 �!
Stream 1=10ty Severity Turt.ldily Severity
1351 1350
I` Aclt'.i:y
Y pH 4.5 �•: I F.3
82243 182242
Wind Velacfly MAI {can Stream Depth it.
'15 64
Airlemlti:r+I!ure ICl
20
Stream WIJIh it.
4
Salinity X
480
Preeipilion ¢n/d4yi
45

, fir.•3�
` r NO'viion of Soil and .Water,COnservation Operation Review,��
I;
[3bNision€of, Soil 'andiWater Conservation ";Compliance Inspection s { i st ;s'';s€ in`'�gs 0 11 � t°'
1 d 1 �i,!,..;m";a, -ii� ,€ f l.E;h. • i91 s 4 1(P ga;g•;,° € � t 4 �. 1�. ;> F & Pi" t :i� i � � ,t,ri.
t: a :� „-. � iAiion of Water: Quality, ; Caxnphance InspeCt�on
& • _ 3 €..� ..I; '.3''ci sL�- i ti.€ i } 1° , j €y„�i S, 1 k't33 !'€'.$:$. i,€>j s'-�E� ,git ,,j`, Eh
i'
n � ��i. ' d .,=: .� 1� . ='1�k �3�. r o. ids N� -1 , a n n.ti ITQ 3 j ry 5,4
Other Agency Operation°Review 1.. �'.
0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tie of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection r
Time of inspection d c 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified Op Conditionally Certified [,] Registered 113 Not OperationalOperationall .Date Last Operated:
Farm Name : ........... .r�.Q. .....L.O• G��1.� Count VQla Glq . ....................... .......................
OwnerName: ....................................................... ....... .. Phone No: ....................... .:...�?.3,5'...............
.......
CLA 7?r�
FacilityContact: .`.. t.................X............................................ Title: ................................................................. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:
Certified Operator: ................................................. ........................................ I—, ...... .. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Form:
A6
J___
....... ... ......... ...................... ......... ........ 1►
Latitude �j ��� Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design ` Current
Po ulationSwne latioPoultry
un Capacity Population Cattle Ca
❑ Wean to Feeder Layer �o ❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish El Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish s
Total DeSlgn Capacity.
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total'SSLW.'.
Numher'iif Lagoons3' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
'Holding Pot ds / Solid -•Traps ' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imimets
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............1. T�f..� ...................................r..................................................................
+,....
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes jf No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
a,Yes
❑ No
'Yes
Ycs
❑ No
Structure fi
❑ Yes j No
Continued on back

f
Facility Number: g — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
5 �
❑ Yes ( No
'�Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
f Yes
/❑
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
. ; .. vi. .. Qn1s.or•dofciencjes Woo hote[� dprit;tgOis;vjsati'wii�
•ctir'res' orideir~ce:about:thisvisit:••�.•.�.•.-.•.•.-.....-..........-. .......
.
we.i111
Comments {refers to question #} Expiarn any` YES ansrs an or any recommendations or any other con)inents 1 t',isrE !llsl,; t f .
���' • ��: � x:..¢e9,tie i I 4I'.1,: ,. I i. ��F 3. v..' III -€. �F.
se,drawin s''of facile to;better ex lam situations€ use additional a es=as4ie&ssa '7 I .'3 ,a
t' t'
g , Tyia, np �. uI °("A" K .: .p ga �`� ..r..
TN P r CAt-`I, l c ' r-O„ e- Tor arr D t K_E is ti "AT— TS N �rtrua l.,c.. AL
lee zSC"Ap I-^ITC.I c.0 PLA-j r-O2'rW
r-A lram
-7) C—+i i t
1-2-S
ALC TrVP_ `%p Te 12 O'le.0/S1-O&gZ_b
Trci _ re, P-.)Ap s:pe Pe
Q�
1-714P Ah M,V.
T S
Reviewer/Inspector Name" aa! 'fi r!77
t�
E€:7 .. - t '�-',
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: " _ Date:

Facility Number Date of Inspection op
Time of Inspection a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted OCertified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ................. a._'aa LS QR -f'_ Poo.fir. ........................... County:...........O. i �� .........................,
....................................................
Owner Name:
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
PhoneNo: ......................................................................................
Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,,,,,. �„.%.fs..... ,GI�Q`�,,,k p �,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Integrator:
Certified Operator: ...................................................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude =•=' =" Longitude =• =' =11
"Design'
Desr Current -, .,
D,est Cu
gn, Trent......"' t+ I Destgri '- `,Current' '
-wine, Ca 'iici ` ; Population ' Poultry
Ca acr ,t:Po' ulahon , Cattle Ca aci !. population
j ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer
t� ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish t,4,10 Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
a ij �. itt�'i
a5 1,;ti�`t t`
Farrow to Finish
P{,
% ' `
:•. Total Destgq;Capactty
Gilts
' h c ri P 7t t e
Boars
Total
.
...
,
Number of Lagoons �L �,� 'ry-. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present I[] Lagoon Area
ID Spray Feld Area �(
Holding Foods /Solid Traps J� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
&jt
F
m, t
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Slate? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
VYes ❑ No
Structure 6
Identifier:
N
Freeboard (inches): �.. .... ... ....
...............................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats o the i egri[y of any of the structures observed? fie/ trees, severe erosion, []Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancetimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
W"A
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &_Document;
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have.a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
•yQpt tgjs.or• djcencio re)noed• 0(rifg tbjs:vjs}t'• You will toi*e 00 fuithoe0*ti
cor.resnoridence:a�atit this visit. ................................... .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
T'AQ�e.4_ FAAQ 1"CO i.os-s aP P:" LAT!;_:Lt Y�tax cm,lc-IfK..��1] A.
PB�J{ Q,,,�so�'fr T�5 1�AS �v� �t.�i-1 PJMPrJ�cz.
'FP-��ciSoA't'� �S�•MA'r� +��' I�� 7�doM 4�a< �FCjr� ��Sac-C`i` 'i �..10 �rCG}��5 g�t-:z
�LAv� l-oc-ATClo Pr tSy9r2Ap4r A, Ge- svjc.Q,:s ��ws�
M ICLC.G(, 7.00��
�%�S�uSSFA 5t��9G� P`' ��£Lt7 Cosa TcO Wq,v, Fc, A%-kc.J t>C /-oLuC-,C_'ty04'glk S
�AP.. CAA B4 L�9 r'JPPi..; -4 Ar ik6OLoIJOM(' C. F_4Tr�6C- L1�7mp_ Uf,-V etr-1 SrhR4P•
rtR-s . C�fk.i Vv oFF> F.�� S�u�G , LA&M4 l fNa, AAA �, lrcer A,r�tt.kss�.5
£DaA-YC ELD c'�ES f_
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (]1I.-, a- I \ r Date:

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O• Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 58 f Date of Visit 5141204U Printed on: 5/9/2000
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ............................................................... County: Qr.ange .............................................. PRE?...........,
OwnerName: IY.I,ike........................................ CWIQn ....................................................... Phone No:(�1�1.2�2.:itxQ35........................................................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................:. Title:.............................. ... Phone No:................ ..................................................................
Mailing Address: 6SQ.7-Holly-R.ift.13.aad.................................................................... Rougemat..N.0 ................................................... 2.7.5.72 ..............
Onsite Representative: Sae-0010.0 ................................................................................. Integrator: Jljdjepej3dCjXt ...........................................................
Certified Operator:Carfia.M ............................... Clayin ............................................ Operator, Certification Number:20830 .............................
Location of Farm:
[]Swine ®Poultry [:]Cattle ❑ HoiLatitude 36 • 12 6 42 46 Longitude 79 • 00 4 1764
t
r�'I{
!
rSw1r e
I'9
Iltrrra
i
t' --atm.uaun, o
Design
A�w
Ca aci
ty.-.uua:ueueu+--ey l
Current
trsrtrtn
Po ulation
tt
Pnult.� Ys II
,ru., E� I>•v.�mux,uH
Design I lICurrent
rr+� i rsrrt.
Ca aci „14Po ulation
Cattle
I
mtro;:+n„� !I wenununare'
Design Current
u�erst
Ca aci Po ulat�on
rtEIF
N r
r3;
'I
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
IN Layer
❑ Non -Layer
60000
I
0
1
❑ Dai
11�
1[:] Non-Dairyl
I
❑Farrow to Wean�,,
rsrtunarrudrn+trtree�uretn��.;rur�rtessu
❑ Other
rl
Is ,, y
ilY4[
'a Ca aci
g P tY
�
I W
I!...
I I 'f
i
lEalf: 3 illrl i,: r! f l<I:;', tf+jph
60,000
240,000
.... _..... ........._.
�'
i
:IIF
Farrow to Feeder
? �.
IA'
yjiilx.....,.r.e.-ur:.y�vu..a.�<e,:.....�,
Farrow to Finish
r
iTotaI Desi
rr
f{ ','�� I! Tota15SL
i7 lir.
l
Gilts
Boars
a.
.a.a....,.,....
.,...e....v......,.-........a
jHFoldin of Lagoons mber,
ds 1 Sohd Traps
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area 4
l r
E❑ No Li uid Waste Mana ement S stem
Discharges ¢L Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes . ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ElNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
0 Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):..:......17.......................................................... ...............................................................................................................................................

IF ► Continued on back
Facility Number: 68-1 Date of Inspection 5/4/2000 Printed on: 519/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No,
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reggircd Recerdl
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0; No"viotations:or deficiencies vvere:notect:duiing thiis:'isif.:Yo'u4AIt Feeeive ino furthez••:
• corresoondence about this -visit. • . : : : : :
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Clayton indicates there has been lots of rain lately and thus concerned about surface runoff and for that reason has not pumped.
board estimated at 17 inches from the top of dike (about 2 inches below the flagging recently installed by Orange SWCD near the
ce at the hydrant). Recommended to pump as soon as possible (today) and maintain adequate freeboard.
ussed sludge at the field edge; too wet to allow for collection thus far. Substantial distance to receiving waters and thus
eciable buffering. Can be land applied at agronomic rates. Other litter has been stored in shelter.
Clayton offered sample reports for sludge stored, the lagoon, and for the pond that was impacted by the spill (3/3/00) and the
analysis.
'F�WAIC. CAP l Q:L s'h !tom 1 • I
Rev�ewerllns ector Name f �^
John N -Hu"
p

7/25/97

Type of Visit r Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit y Routine O Complaint, O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Dale of Visit: % 1 Di Time:
b d
$ O i
— / of Operational Q Below Threshold
rmitted 'P,&rtified pQ lConditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ....6.4�....5
......... DYUTI'`�....V.rtl............. County:..... Ylla,?.r(.G............................................................
OwnerName:.....`............ .t....... 1'cJ........................................... Phone No:...................................................................................:.
FacilityContact: .. /_ ..................�j�, j .............. ...................Title:..,......................,,..................................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:., i0 Jam...... .1. �.`.� ..... ?. ` J ....'.1.......................................... �� e Lc ................................................ .S�J Z....................
Onsite Representative:........". :L€ �� ""�.I Integrator:....................................................
...............................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Acation of Farm:
❑ Swine 9110'ultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude '
6 64
Longitude
�• �ORs
De'. Current;
Design Current'
Design Current
Ca aci ` :,Po ulatioro . Poultry
Ca aci . Po ul>itinn Cattle
Cg aci Po itlafioo.=`
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer fv01 coo ❑ Dairy
Ilk
❑ Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Utal ^SSLW
;t� Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JJEJ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area s
3�
Holding Po€nds / Solid' Trags;;: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .. ... ��.............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):!
5/00
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes 10-Ro
❑ Yes PKNO
❑ Yes Rio
❑ Yes Oq4o
❑ Yes ANo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: ion — p 1 Date of Inspection l
•5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ;3No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes Y "°
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 13 Y s ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes JVNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes (P(No
Waste Aaalication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes 2No
12. Crop type A�S L_l
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yiQl ii$njs:ojr defc�epcie5 *re no ed• dWing th�s'vjsjt; • ;Y:oo #J11•lreeeiye
Torres oiideiki abbot this :visit: •
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes�rN
r
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes' No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes - XNo
❑ Yes J21"No
❑ Yes )ZrNo
❑ Yes 101�0
❑ Yes M'No
❑ Yes RNO
❑ Yes IRNO
❑ Yes JZrNo
❑ Yes eNo
-�- (W ej�,�.'
G � �-�. ,fir, 1•iw ' o��+-�- i � `T� c {ak az��" �j�j ��`j °''�` ` �s�i'"�q''`Q �",,,t-
�pr Gt.Ot,.u" G(.tf L,,uj -t f - 14 T►;, ' " • "•""S�]` j SileY! Z 1 t3n� 1{ r¢ t0.1 tR
w da O.P-k..�J
Reviewer/Inspector Name' .'� »J. 4 ` ' # , 1 r > lj; 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q,t�. L/� } Date: % 2.S a! 5100

Facility Number: g —� Date of Lsspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes P(No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ZXo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes] No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 6 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 9 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ONo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes P No
.&I
5100

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
AIF
. 0!
EDEHNR
!j S. f� n,, p 1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT N/�s
August 3, 1995
Mr. Mike Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemont, NC 27572
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Gates Poultry Farm Operation
Holly Ridge Road
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
On July 18, 1995, Mr. Ted Cashion from this office conducted
a compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection
is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems
associated with waste disposal systems.
Mr. Cashion's site visit determined that wastewater from this
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the State.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties, and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office also reminds you that, if not already
accomplished, an approved animal waste management plan must be
incorporated by December 1997. This plan must be certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Clayton
August 3, 1995
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Mr. Cashion at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\clayton.ins

JUL-14-1995 15 : 26 FROM LEM WATER (DUAL I TY SECT 16N TO
PRO P. 02/02
Site Requires Immediate A tten6on ,
Facility No. Lg_1_
DIVISION OF E VIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ` T�9 1995
Time: � • /3� .
1;3rrn Nance/Owner: �rc� f of _ toV//," ,
L
C1,7o h R 071f9/74
Mailing Address: _. 4 s D lr%o{r �g e f k%�._��S�J��'
T-' U
County: ��roki; e
Integrator. Phone:
-
On Sire Renresenta.tive: �� p Clay �a h _ Phone: � le
Physical ' �Jd �03s-
Physical Address/Location:
h S �_A e e
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry ✓ Cattle
Design Capacity: _M Dov Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ) p Longitude: _ZV _0_Lf 49• S Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Ammal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I boot -t- 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxirnately I Foot f 7 inches) Yes orQ Actual Freeboard: _�)~t. 4 .Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(DWas any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray'? es or No Is the cover crop adequate? &or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS_rnin=' um setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?(ne or No
100 Feet from Wells? es or No
ce animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or6D
ardmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Nlap.Blue Line'? Yes or 1�0
.'s animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch. Hushing system, or other
;iTni;ar Man-tnttde dt:ViCes? 'Yes Or q If Y-s. Please Expl:drt.
Fyn 1 uEc rac jbty inaintain adequate waste tnnattagement records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigates Can specific acreage with cover crop )? Yes ur Rio
Additional Comments: _ I001 or/1 Over 7C%p rv�; .� �,lr► pwh e�-_
o wet Y _e4�.he use,,l4 er v w, �f• ao� S Lr ew 47rr4
tr cr.rn•
eo/ CGrr0 5
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signarwc
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

�p❑ She requires immediate atzen@on
Fadlily number
SITE V1SFATION RECORD
Date: 1995 `^ t As ::.4
.. F +w.
Owner: 1A QLL1, -ro N Farm !dame: ;A- R fA
County: O�La►st'✓iv
Agent Visiting Site: earn 4u - T HsFhcne: (ci IT' 7 3:— 9.)c tE i T- ari To
Operator. W2- t Sue CAA -TU+s � Fhcne: I 19 ) rT 6o 3 5
OnZte Representative: R1Xke-t Sut Cue rca Phcne:
Physics[ Address: 1-4aL [ZCo6 TZ90..
9iz- rig
Mailing Address: ��•�-
T yp4 of Operation: Swine ` Poultry Catfte
Design Capacity: rl ar ocx wa�a a5 Number of Arimds on Site: (a U 1 0 0 y
Latitude: Longitude: �r GC „
Type of inspection: ✓Crourd Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste L=gccn have sur fcient freeboard aLkFoot - 25 year 24 hcur sicrm event
(approximately 1 Fcct f 7 inches) Yes or No
A, -.'I El Freebocrd:
Feet �, inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, pease address the other lacoens' r eebcard under the
comments sect!cn.
Was any seepage ebserved from the lagoon(s)?
Was there erosion of the dam?
Is adequate land available for lard applicaficn?
Is the corer crop adequate?
Additional C
e_ I Liar
Fax to (9119) 715-3559
a ,.,ram
r
r•
Yes or IN
Yes or V
e or No
Yes or 114o
e -e 'll 11
We- o .54ry o r C layr�anS
let tA-vck 4o t. 0 Ugh .S -HlnT f`7L
Ka
Signature of Agent
�11

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment .
and Natural Resources !�f
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENFa
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
February 1, 2001
Gail Hughes
Orange Soil & Water Conservation District
PO Box 8181
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Lagoon Closure Plan
Gates. Brothers Poultry
Facility ##68-1
Orange County
Dear Ms . ' Hughes :
Upon reviewing the information in the lagoon closure plan
received Dec. 8, 2000 for the Gates Brothers poultry farm, -it
appears that the closure could be implemented within acceptable
guidance to comply with the nondischarge requirements of the
Division of Water Quality. It is'required to complete the
closure of the structure within a year of this approval. However,
there is some question as to the actual volume of solids that
must be applied, but the Consent Judgement allows for an
extension or modification to the time required to properly close
the lagoon should it be determined that the task cannot be
completed as this initial plan projects. Any request for
extending the deadline must be made in writing to this office as
soon as it is determined that the original target date cannot be
met.
As this facility has received a General Animal Waste Permit
it will be effective for the term of the permit or until the
structure is certified as properly closed. The permit holder is
responsible to abide by the conditions in the permit that will
still be applicable to this closure. This includes but is not
limited to: notification requirements, no discharges of wastes,
and maintaining application records for wastes applied.

Gail Hughes;
Gates Closure Plan
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call Mr. Hunt at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kennet Schu , A.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Phil Telfer, Dept. Of Justice
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO-Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment .
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENFZ
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AN❑ NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
February 1, 2001
Orange Soil & Water Conservation District
PO Box 8181
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Lagoon Closure Plan
Gates Brothers Poultry
Facility #68-1
Orange County
Dear Ms. Hughes:
Upon reviewing the information in the lagoon closure plan
for the Mike Clayton poultry facility it appears that the closure
could be implemented within acceptable guidance to comply with
the nondischarge requirements of the Division of Water Quality.
Although there is some question as to the actual volume of solids
that must be applied, there are provisions within the guidance of
the Consent Judgement that allow for an extension or modification
to the time required to properly close the lagoon should it be
determined that the task cannot be completed as this initial plan
projects. However, any request for extending the deadline must
be made in writing to this office as soon as it is determined
that the original target date cannot be met.
As this facility has received a General Animal Waste Permit
it will be effective for the term of the permit or until the
structure is certified as properly closed. The permit holder is
responsible to abide by the conditions in the permit that will
still be applicable to this closure. This includes but is not
limited to notification requirements, no discharges of wastes,
and maintaining application records for wastes applied.

The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call Mr. Hunt at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Phil Telfer, Dept. Of Justice
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

93.5 —7
1+65
C+15 r 15,
Cross Section O-D'
330,
Waste Treatment Lagoon
t Warren Fafrcloth
District Technician
Angela D. Greene
-oved by Ronald L. Marlow
Civil Engineer
ticl e 111-81
Izon tdl 1 11-401
e for Dam = B895 yds. 3
Lagoon to 94,D , 31585 yds.
95.0
Lagoon 84.0 I vme
Spillway 94 0
in Northwest Corner of
:en house. Elev. 100.0
Cross Section I-P
I _+4 5.
Cross Section D-D'
.71
Cross Section I -I' ;'J 4,9f
84.0
330'
1101 fdr
27 - 5'
1:72�6
265'
330'
1+65 4+.
Sheet! of 6

-1-2111 4/2001 09: 27
NON -DISCHARGE COMP PAGE 01
IN THE. GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COLTR-r DiVX(ZTON
COUNTY OF ORANGE 00 CVS 0257
STATE OF NORTH CAROUNA, ex zel. `
MICHAEL F. EASLEY. Attorney
AN
General and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN,
Secretary, North Carolina Department of
m) T1�1i
Environezit, and Natural }
Resouzces, )
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, }
519-733-0059
STATE OF NORTH CA,ROLINA: 1
NUKE CLAYTON d/b/a GATES )
BROTHERS POULTRY ,FARM )
}
Defendant. )
Plaintiff, State of North Carolina ("State") and Defendant: Mike Clayton, hereby agree to
the entry of this Conseza Judgment in order to resolve the matters in controversy between the
parties. The parties agree that This Consent Judgmextt tT1ay be signed out of count),, out of session
=d out of dlstTict.
The State brought this action to coupe] the Defendant to com Iy with the State's water
quality laws, administ-ative rules and Defondant's certified animal waste management plan at the
Gates Poultry Farm (",Farm"). P=suaztt to a Temporary Restraining Order issued by the Court,
the Defendant depopWated the Farm and took other actions to bz:i g the Faun into compliance.
In support of the Consent Judgment, the parties agree to and the Count mares the follow7ng:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plain-tif; is the sovereign State of North Carolina. This aciiori was brought on the
relation of Bill Holman. Secretar%- of the Department of 1_nviro==, and Natural Resources
(berelna ter referred to as "DENR"). the State agency wNch has atzt17ioriry 10 enforce the States

12/1NON-DISCHARGE CDMP PAGE
4/2001 09:27 919-733-0059 '02
enVironrnental ,pollution laws, including laws enacted to protect the water quality of the State.
This action was also being brought on the relation of Michael F. Easley who. in his capacity as
Attomey General, is vested with the common law power to bring civil actions to abate public
nuisances.
2. The defendant; Mile Clayton, is the owner and operator of a poultry growing
,farm operation known as the Farm which is located on State Road 1524, also known as Holly
Ridge Road, near the intersection of State Road 1524 and State Highway 57 in Orange County,
North Carolina.
s 3. The Superior Court has jurisdiction of this action and that Orange County is a
proper venue.
4. - Pursuant to its statutory authority, the EMC ,has developed a Poultry Waste
Operation General Permit for poultry operations (the "General .Permit"). Defendant has applied
for and obtained a Certificate of Coverage under the General Permit and is covered by its terms.
5. Defendant, pursuant to the applicable statute and rules, has obtained a Certified
Animal Waste Management PIan ("CAWNLP") which is incorporated by reference into the
General Permit.
b. The State, in its Complaint, alleged numerous violations of the State's
environmental laws and regulations, in particular Chapter 143 of the General Statutes and the
regulations regarding animal wastes management systems codified in Subchapter 2H.0200 of
Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (the "non -discharge rules"), and of the
CAWMP for the Farm.

12/14/2001 e5:27
919-733-0059
NON -DISCHARGE COMP
PAGE 03
7. The Defendant, in his Answer, admitted that some violations of the statutes,
regulations, General Permit and CA Wlv1P have occurred at the Farm, including failure to
maintain adequate freeboard and discharges of animal waste to the waters of the State.
S. The CAWMP for the Farm establishes the maximum liquid level in the lagoon to
be two (2) feet below the top of the dam.
9. As a result of the Temporary Restraining Order issued in this matter, which, has
been extended by Consent and remains in effect as of the entry of this Consent Judgment, the
Farm has been depopulated. The Defendant has agreed to close the ,Farm and has agreed to do so
in accordance with Natural Resources Conservation Service ("NRCS") standards, a copy of
which is 'attached hereto as "Exhibit 1 " arad is incorporated by reference. Defendant
acknowledges that he has been informed that other sixrnilar lagoon closures have cost
approximately $60,000 and that there is no way of knowing at this tune the costs he will incur in
closing the lagoon,
10. The ,Defendant has requested that any civil penalties which may be assessed by
the State for the violations alleged in the Complaint be included AT this Consent Judgment. The
parties have agreed that the Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environmerit and Natural
Resources a ctvjl pe. alt`y of;S50,QO-in.accordahce with -the schedule set -but belom,.,'I.n assessing
this penalty, the Director of the Division of Water Quality has relied on financial records
provided by the Defendant and the cost of rectifying the damage by permanent closure of the
lagoon., Should the Defendant fail to fully provisions:for closure or payment of
the S5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall bed
� ,000 and become immediately^due and payable, The State may collect such penalty by ding

12I14/2001 e9:27 919-793-e059
NON -DISCHARGE COMP PAGE 04
a Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 130B of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G.S. 143$-282.1(c)_
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
11. Defendant has violated the State's water quality laws and administrative rules, its
CAW A? and General Permit.
12. The State is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.
13. During the pendenacy of the closure, the Defendant must comply with the
provisions of the State's environmental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAWMP.
AGREEMENT
$aced on the foregoing Findings of pact grad Conclusions of Law, the Parties agree that:
14. In consultation with a representative of the Orange Soil and Neater Conservation
Service, they have developed the following time line for closure of the lagoon:
a. Defendant shall submit, within ninety (90) days of the ezit3­y of this
Consent Judga-nent, for approval by the Divisiori of Water Quality ire
DENR a plan for lagoon closure certified by the Orange County Soil and
Water Conservation Service. Such plan shall provide for proper closure of
the lagoon within eighteen(18) `mopth's 'bf the -entry of,, s Consent
JudgM nt �
b. Upon':a l�,pf,the, Plan by the Division of Water Quality, Defendazt
shalEl�illy��;i�zp]eri�ent-tt�e certafzed`�cIosure plan wi�lzin�the¢tirrteframe
pr�de�d p�"'n�flae.p]'a� In—zmpl�rrienting the p]an, tl�e De#'endar�2 shall
consult wltka the orange County Soil and Water.Coz�servation 5envice.
c. Should Defenda�at despzte drligent''goocl faxtl7 efXorts'to implernen2 th
ce �ie� d��c os pl re extensions —of -time- to—comple lag on
10

12/.14/2001 09:27 919-733-0059
NON -DISCHARGE COMP PAGE e5
closure, the Defendant skull provide the basis for such extensions��the
theOrange County —Soil and Water Conservation Service.- �, If the the
Orange Co`urity Soil anc1� Water Conservation Service agrees that such
extension is warrented, it will recornmend such extension to the Division
of Water Quality which shall determine if the extension is warranted. If
Defendant disagrees with a decision regarding an, extenslozz of time, it
may seek a review of such decision by �la:ng a motion in the cause,
d. In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water Quality in
implementing the certified closure plan, John Lunt, inspector for the
Division of Water Quality in the Raleigh Regional Office of the
Department of Evniro=ent and Natural Resources, is designated the
sirigle contact for the Department for purposes of this Consent Judgment.
The Department may designate a different contact by notifying counsel for
the Defendant.
15. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Envim=ezzt and Natural Resources a
ezvil penalty of S5000 in accordance with the followiztg schedule: r'IOOO on or before December
��I�'2000,�- ',Ni.SO0 on r before Decernbel `2041�; and $230 r before Deceunber 31, 2002.
Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions for closure or payment of the
$5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall be $50,000
and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect sucb penalty by filing a
.Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
pezzalty pursuant to Chapter 150E of the General Statutes oz to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G.S. 143B-282. I (c).
16. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for violations alleged in
the Complaint only. The Parties recognize that any violations not known- to the State at the time
of this Consent Judgment oz committed after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcement provided to the State by statute or common law.
Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
5

12/14/2001 09.27
919-733-0059
NON -DISCHARGE COMP
PAGE 06
M.
Defendant shall not repopulate the Gates Poultry Farm for a period of five (5)
years from the entry of this Consent Judgment. if Defendant decides to operate a poultry
operation after that time, Defendant shall notify DENR and the Attorney General's Office before
engaging in such operation and shall obtain all necessary permit for such operation.
B. In consultation with a representative of the orange Soil and Water Conservation
Service,'the Defendant shall implement the following time line for closure of'the lagoon,:
Defendant shall submit, within ninety (90) days of the entry of this
Consent Judgment, fbi approval by the Divisionz of Water Quality in
DENR a plan for lagoon closure certified ("Plan") by the Orange County
Soil and Water Conservation Service. The Plan shall provide for proper
closure of the lagoon within eighteen (IS). months of the entry of this
Consent Judgment.
2. Upon approval of the Plan by the ,Division of Watet Quality, Defendant
shall fully implement the Plan within the time frames provided in the plan..
In implementing the Plan, the Defendant shall consult as necessary with
the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service.
�. Should Defendant, despite diligent good faith P-5orts to izmplernent the
Plan, require extensions of time to complete lagoon clos=. the Defendant
shall provide the basis for such extensions to the Orange County SoA and
Water Conservation Service. If the Orange County Soil and Water
Conservation Service agrees that such extension is necessary, it shall
recommend such extension to the Division of Water Quality which shall
determine zf the extension is warranted. If Defendant disagrees with a
decision .regarding an exterisiozz of time, it may seek a review of sucb
decision'by filing a motion in the cause.
4. In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water Quality_ irk
implementing the-P_lan,. o Spector fqo the Division of Water
Quality in'the Raleigh Regional. Offiice.of._the_Department of Envirofvuent
Azad Natural Resources, is designated -as the szngle contact for the
Vepartm,ent. __tZhe Department may designate a different contact by
notifying counsel for the Defendant.
0

12/.14/2001 09:27 919-733-0059
NON -DISCHARGE COMP PAGE 07
C. During the pendency of the closure, the Defendant shall comply with the
provisions of the State's environmental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAWMP. Nothing in this Consent Judgment shall be deemed to prohibit amendment of the
CAWMP in compliance with all applicable statutes and rules.
D. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources a
civil penalt), of $5000, without interest, in accordance with the following schedule: $1000 on or
before December 31, 2000; $1500 on or before December 31, 2001; and $2500 oz or before
,December 31, 2002. Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions of the Plant
or for the payment of the $5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty
assessed shall be $50,000 =d become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such
penalty by filing a. Motion its the Cause in thz s matter. Defendant specil:ically waives any tight to
contest the penalty pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the
penalty puzsuant to G.S. 143B-282.I(c).
F. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for violations alleged in
the Complaint_ The Parties recogT, ze that any violations not known to the State at the time of
this Consent Judgment or comxrzitted after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcerzzent provided to the State by statute or common law.
Thais the %D day ofu+-� , 2000, at. m.
Hozi. Steve A., Balog
Superior Court Judge
7

12h14/2001 29:27
919-733-0059
NCN-DI5CHARGE COMP
PAGE 08
We consent:
Nike Clayton, De ndatlt
Ronnie P. King
RONNIE P. LNG, P.Q
Attorney for Defendant
rT. Stevens, Direc r
vision of Water Q lity
apartment of Enviroziment a.Qd Natuzal Resources
Philip A. elfer
Special Deputy Attorney Gm-ra.l
North Carolina Department of Justice

• 12/.14/2001 09:27 919-733-0059 NON -DISCHARGE COMP PAC7t U7
EXHIBIT
og3.1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSZRVATION 5ERVIC'I;
CONSERVATION PRACTICE STAINMARD
INTERIV3 �T:��'YDA.kD
far
CI..OSL'RE OF ARANDC)NT-D WASTF_ TRLATMENT.LACOONS
AND
WASTE STORAGE PONDS
fNc•)
Code 998
DEFINTI'ION
The szLfe removal and "=enr of existing w=c
from W4stt Tm�rnt Lagoom and Wz mt
Storagr Fonds Ihw are no lorgcr 1,n use for thcsr
kaended purpost+.
PUPPOSE
Tne purpose of this rom--n-imon pant --a= is to
protcrt the t]uallry o sur1 ac`. watcr ,'u71j
graundWatr'r rmoart= aad to safcguard the
pabvc 13 h th.
CONM171ONS "W.LMR-: PRACTICE
Th=5 pracri= applies to animal Waste Trnrtncrn
Lagoons and Wastes Storaec ptmti5 that, art no
ion¢--r used for crigir4 :"zmzdtd purpose,
CRITZRIA
Tr-. Qbji:c:ivr is to rrnov: rr.at_r�nls to tht
m_. am=. exr=r prac•.itab�e �Mm a
L�eaos�lscrucrure prior ra eiasurP_
Water Qva31ty Trnzm,
No special N% tom; qusiiry •,a lviTl be rcquirad.
Reznotsl of Inflow 1)evires
All dcvicts usr..d to coovry znimza K-2LSL inro -he
L-490a Dr Srpr:g; pcni shall be rcmDru.
SPMways
All &hzDduried lagoons or.ivz zc storage ponds
that ar- not br:x6r-d or Med That have as
ctnbaui-mmt of 3 it or maze, shall have a
priacipad spiiiway and as eme-rev svWwav
installed th' .t rnee!u ibc requm!mmts of
Cons_—/atian P=tice Staadard S78 (Ponds).
Enczratcd Pita
For mccam-'d pizs'.Lu wCrc prcxiously uscd for
w-a.sie t7 i "cml 1xgpow Or was[C ncrav ponds
Tar an to be tr]Dstt? 4 rra-rom le effixrts m^t
be mzLdc Tv xg Z and r=avc AU um=
mats'rials. If Shc botsom of The lagflon/smiu-nrc
>_s abnw ncc warn table at thz time tf Clt:.surc and
will supporr earth moving ee%ripmeal , it mur, be
scravcd. A gazUed t=�nira3 specialise emus
dtu-mint tht soil Stabibrr far Z�L� movms
tgWpM=L 'For lagoon lsnvt:qucs tha4 art not To
be s-aVcd aad those with botxams docamcnTed to
be below the waar =ble at •the Time of dasure,
The dtpzh of "agit=E:T" wasrt t ='_n21 x =Z=ing
in the lagonaist-Ucnvc az zhc drac 0z' uloslue may
not ws � a v=.tm dcpth or mare == oar,
(I) foot
Tbc waste wzxT wZ be. analv=d aad applied to
=ps at agromorr sc :arcs based on R E5mic Ytld
E.^cpc;=ion (PLY F.) for rvtrcg= ClY).
Oacc �,il �lud,: i5 rcmaws,'.i Inc O�va4r � nc�
opacm C`fV3ip._4 TtW =Vera U z Zc5u Watc:
pond, or t]e pi: rttay be ae�L
Cwtu Jli an prs %;m, n.nJar& am rrryt co pr}1 n.ii qil v, and uP-ia" irn+t4e- Te obs:n *m cwrvr l oerairM1
�� by ��=1ldird. �nt�S'[ cht 4y�� Fjber�-sue Z`ona�ryacion Sryl ee.
[ornpu� �il�' 99R.��iesu�.a�ese�rn�Zn�.iJ
JAIV-JARY, 1997

2o01 09:27 919-733-0059
rra�c
NON -DISCHARGE COMP
999-2
Rmbankrnent Structures
If a lagoon/stru=m is to oc brached, tive l quid
be pumped cut and the rc mho n j waste
tttsterW s=pe4. Rcasouble s£forts must be
tt1.-J& to remove ail waste materials prior to
claxurz.
For ta300zV=CZ1ire3 not to be brrat_htd,
rusmmble efforts must be made W agitate and
r6 Uh,z all w'astr =jCz1al5. If thr bomb of the
lagoon/suueztre is above the water tzLble at the
time of closure and will suppptt earth Inaviag
egwpfn=� it rums be scwzd. A qualiheyd
tLCLnit:Ll sperm45-t must dettrmi4c the soil
stability for z=rzh moving equipmemc for
lxgo=z/strttct4;rm that asc not to be scraped tared
thm with bor m s doCiimmu4 %Q be- btlerw the
vwatzr table at the time of ck wure, the depth of
-4mv!r waat:C AWitrial remaining im the
iajmn/strucrurz as the Time of dosum may not
L?6-e*d a masim.um depth of roore than one (I)
foot.
Tbc wrszt w=r will be aaaivzt4 And Appl ad to
Czvps am wgonoraic r= based on Rmlivuc reid
Zv=:arion Y.E.) for uitvgcu (N),
7f iwmded for use as a fresh water pond, the
requirrrne= under "Spsllways" sciry of this
standard shall be user.
Tie cmbanl==t may be:
1) brftthed to that it will no longer impound
liquid, or 2) be Ich izrzcr and mllvwed to fill with
fr-.sh ar=r for Uar, W a ir=h warcr pond.
If the =bania-ncnt is tbt sk:m and
botlosn of the breach shall he S=ble for M4 Sail
rrL=rlal invoived., bye 6Lz si& siopa tlmU be as
W_-rprr Than 3:1.
vtgetui o n
All d,srurbed arenz shall be vgcWed in
aceordauae %vith Tsc4lz i=d Guide 5mnrl:L d 34.21
Cri=U Arts Trmm'mcnt.
C ONSTDERAnONS
The proper mmovil of org:ics grid nurriears znd
preveaaou of poi]utart= discbasgca to sUrfaes
Watca is the =Pods vilhy of the Owner.
FLANS AND SP> CMCATIONS
Paris and speei,fi=o on-i for closure of abnndor;td
wa_trt trearmtnt lagoons =4 WLM storage ponds
shall be in keeping with this si nd�a,,rdil and sh2
describ t11e requirer3iew for app g the
pmacdcc to achic-m its inteaded purpost,
If %Lc: wastt trzatmcnr iaguon or waste storagt
pond being coniver[ed to a f=h warm pond is
nquirtd to meet Cousermnon SLUwarri
378 (Poor9s), the glans and specific=ions will
also be in km-epir.g with the requirements. of ,hax
3i.7nclard. .
OrEP-4T1ON AND N1aINT>~NANCE
A properly decoczirriissioned %v=e trexm=t
lag0op, or waste storagt pond should require little
or as aperatitfn aztd naime=:e; however, is it
is bc= =vermd to anod=-ase, such as A
fresh waW pond, operation and maintcw�.nce wM
be in a=rdaacc NvkE the aetds U se: funk iu
Couservatioa Pm=i= Stzndard.378 (Ponds).
KRCS. NC
,A ,7LTAV-V nn-

MIKE CLAYTON��
GATES BROTHERS POULTRY FARM
.�..... A .............. ` ��" * ., .,...........,..,
6307 Holly Ridge Rd..
lioug,moat, N` , 27572 �pENN�Rf''t
p' m-,-,"Fax [phone]
January 25, 2002 ,
Dear Sirs,
. This letter is in regard to the closing of the lagoon on my farm. This past year, 2001,1
have pumped 4.2 million gallons of liquid from the lagoon. During this time Gail Hughes,
Orange County Soil and Water Conservationist and Brent Bogue, MRCS Conservationist
kept monthly monitoring on the lagoon level. On Dec. 19, 2001 J.D. Hester, DWQ
inspector, met with Gail, Brent and myself to check my progress, everyone was pleased
with the work so far. It was agreed that an extension would be necessary to close the
lagoon. I am requesting an extension of six months by which time, weather permitting,
this closure can be completed. If circumstances prevent completion, J.D. Hester, Brent,
and Gail will review the situation on August 1, 2002,
Sincerely,
Mike Clayton

SOIL&WATER
CONS[ R VAT ION
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
306 Revere Road * P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Phone: [phone] • Ext. 2750
Fax: [phone]
112916Z
1'O: Division of Water Resources
JD Hester
FROM: Brent Rogue, MRCS District Conservationist
Gail Hughes, Soil and Water Conservationist
R F, Request for Extension I'm -
Gates i3rothers Poultry Farm Lagoon Closure
The progress on the lagoon closure for the Gates 13rothers Poultry Farrar is going,
well. According to the records, Mr. and Mrs. Clayton, owners, have pumped
approximately 4.2 million gallons of liquid from the lagoon. Orrr agency has been
monitoring the liquid levels monthly since Feb. 28, 2001. From the December records,
the current liquid level was 2.4 feet below maximum liquid level (averaging 4.4 feet
below the top of the darn), therefore; there is not a threat of overflow.
On Dec. 19, 2001, Mr. Clayton, 130gue, Hughes, JD 1-lester, and John Hunt met at the
farm to discuss the progress and the need for an extension of time for the closure process.
Ail parties agreed that an extension is needed to allow for proper clean out of the
remaining liquid, and the solids. We all agreed a six-month extension, weather
permitting, should be adequate to complete the project. If the closure is not complete on
or before August 1, 2002, there will be a review with our agency and DWQ, and Mr.
Clayton to determine if additional time is needed to complete the job.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call our office at 919-245-2750.

C 0 M!! h V A T I O X
Orange Soil & Water FAO-aox 8191
Conservation District Hillsborough, NC 27278
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE:
TO: J-D 1�e 5�eX
RE: 1 �° �a s LLV-e l-e. �f'eP-_ -2C kA.a.i nA�'.
FAx NO .: 'i/ 9 - 5-71- y 7 / S
FROM: ORANGE SNCD --
FAX # : [phone]
This transmission consists of pages including
cover sheet,
COMMENTS:
4eS4 e_�r ----
$T�
O
C.ii�l C�
I
ZO/10 'Bd 03 210 1L96161ZZZ0101<-- US3 30NUE0 6994 U4 616 md�9:90 Z0/gZ/1.0w'

1.. 'f
MIKE CLAYTON
GATES BROTHERS POULTRY FARM
January 25, 2002
Dear Sirs,
'this letter is in regard to the Closing of the lagoon on my farm. This past year, 2001, I
have pumped 4.2 million gallons of liquid from the lagoon. During this time Gail Hughes,
Orange County Soil and Water Conservationist and Brent $ogue, MRCS Conservationist
kept monthIy monitoring on the lagoon level. On Dec, 19, 2001 J.D. Hester, DWQ
inspector, met with Gail, Brent and myself to check my progress, everyone was pleased
with the work so far. It was agreed that an extension would be necessary to close the
lagoon, I am requesting an extension of six months by which time, weather permitting,
this closure can be completed. If circumstances prevent completion, J.D. Hester, Brent,
and Gail will review the situation on August 1, 2002.
Sincerely,
Mike Clayton
ZO/20 'Bd W03 9i01 96l6iZZZ0101<-- VSd 39M0 699Z Z24 616 wd70:90 Z0/9Z/H

0
S OIL & °:'WATER
Yours
C O R d Z R V A V I O N
Orange Soil & Water
Conservation District
Phone: [phone], Ext. 2750
11/27/2000
TO: John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
0
USDA
Natural Resources PO Box 8181
Conservation Service 306 Revere Road
Phone: [phone], Ext. 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278
FROM: Gail Hughes Brent Bogue
Soil Conservationist District Conservationist
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District USDA -MRCS
RE: Lagoon Closure Plan for Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
The Orange Soil and Water Conservation District (District) and the USDA -Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) staff began working with Mike and Sue Clayton, owners and
operators of Gates Brothers Poultry Farm, on a lagoon closure plan in early June.
In June, the Clayton's requested and received approval from the local technical staff to extend
the waste application pumping schedule until the second week in July. There had been
several days of rain, and the extension allowed the Clayton's to reduce the liquid levels in the
lagoon.
The local NRCS and District staff, along with the NRCS and Division of Soil and Water
technical engineering staff evaluated the lagoon and have made the following
recommendations for closure. The staff members will continue to monitor progress until
closure of the lagoon is completed.
Estimated amount of liquid volume (based on original designs) for irrigation is 4,453,575
gallons.
Estimated volume of solid waste to be excavated and broadcast is 1,484,524 gallons.
(25% of total volume) .This estimate may be adjusted once liquid volume -is decreased and
the solids are visible. 1353
Clayton's will follow their existing waste utilization plan for irrigation. (50 3-wettable acres
available)
As solids become visible, Clayton's will begin to agitate the solids, incorporating solids
with liquids and continue to irrigate waste.
Waste samples will be taken as solids are incorporated into the liquid. The waste
utilization plan will be up -dated, as needed by the technical staff.
Solids that can not be irrigated will be sampled and a waste utilization plan will be written
for this material that will be broadcast.

Solids will be excavated from lagoon and broadcast onto grassland on the farm. (58 acres
are available).
The Clayton's have decided to flatten the entire embankment (rather than breaching one
section), seed the area in grass, therefore, being able to mow and maintain the -area as
pasture.
After completion of closure, staff will certify closure of the lagoon and notify the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) staff.
The Claytons have begun the closure process -by irrigation of the liquid waste. Staff members
will continue to monitor liquid levels throughout the winter months. Progress of the closure
will be determined by weather conditions.
Staff members will continue to up -date DWQ staff with progress of the closure. If you have
any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Brent Bogue or Gail Hughes
at 919-245.2750.

S OIL & WATER USDA
C O R I R V A T I O It
Orange Soil & Water Natural Resources PO Box 8181
Conservation District Conservation Service 306 Revere Road
Phone: [phone], Ext. 2750 Phone: [phone], Ext. 3 Hillsborough, NC
27278
Juice 4, 2001
Mike and Sue Clayton (Gales 13rol.hers Puulli_y Farm)
Your operation is branlal an extension of Ilic wasle applicatiorr window lirr 1)u111l}ing on
fescue.
The lagoon is mandated to be closed by Feb, I, 2002. This extension is granted so that
you may continue to pump the liquid waste out of the lagoon and be able to begin
removal of the solid waste this fall so the closure can be completed in a timely manner.
The technical Staff Will continue to monitor liquid levels in the lagoon and the condition
of the vegetation where the waste is being pumped. This extension will be from June 1,
2001 until Sept. 1, 2001. if conditions of the vegetation deteriorate, then the technical
staff will recommend pumping be discontinued until weather and vegetation conditions
improve. 'As operator of the farm, you need to continue to take waste samples and
record the irrigation times and 11110MItS,
Technical Specialist Signature Oat e*j g/
Technical Specialist Signature

ANIMAL WAS'fR UTILIZATION PKAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
IFI:ELDI SOIL TYPF & CLASS-
(CROP
IYI:PLPI UBS
ICOMM
NI
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASES
(CODE
I
I AW
N
I PER
IAC'RES1
AW N
IPER
AC
I AC
I
I USED
I
I
I AI111f.,Y
I
I
I RES:1 0.
I
I APPLI,C
I
I
I ME'l'll
I
I
I nl
I
I f':I:MF
9951
11A
14.8
I180
11620
I
19
IHrB
IFG
I
#
IT
I
I
I
I
IFl3-MY,SP-NV
1 TT83 . 5
9951.
2, 3
I Or:
I FC=,
13.1
110,251
17 .6
IFB-MY,sh-NV
12538
9951,
I5,6
ILg
IFG
13.6
I1.35
I
118.8
I
IT
I
I
I
IFB-MY,SP-NV
TOTAL, 1 5041 . 5
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. :i.nterplanted) o,-
w.i.nter. annuals .follow summer: annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management
plan that addresses all nutrients. This elan only addresses nitrogen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 3

At.1MAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.).
TRACT
IFIELDI
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
[CROP IYIELDI
LBS
ICOMM NI
**
1* LBS
I
I DETERMINING PHASE
ICODE
I
I AW N
I PER
IACRESI
AW N
I
I
I
I
IPER ACI
AC
I
I USED
I
I
I -_---I
I
I' or
I
I -------
I
I
IAPPLYI
I
IRESID.I
I APPLIC
IMETH
I
I
I
I
I N
I
I TIME
I
I
I END
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter
annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less
any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following Legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE I CROP I UNITS IPER UNIT
FG I FESCUE - GRAZED
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES I LBS AW N USED
� I
TALE 1 135.4 I 5041.5
I I
TABLE 2 10 10
I f
TONS 137.5
I I�
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 4

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
4S =7S3
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field No'
and
Hydrant Noz
Travel
Speed
ffumin)
Application
Rate
. finlhr)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
I Width (ft) Len . (TO
� Wetted
I Diameter
I (feet)
Nozzle'
Diameter
(inches)
EQUIPMENT SE • iNGS
operating operating
Pressure Pressure
@ Gun (psi) Reel (psi)
Arc
Pattern
I
}
I Comments
7r
i �:.;
I ,J I
Q I
3e
I z,-
I
I
I tr
I s
! „5
I I
0
Ir
3 5
2-7
I
'
57 S3
s
1
n i
3 36
i .z. ,
7; 32L2
i
��;
2 D
d 3
i z
I .5
i
I
! s3 +
!
I
-2D
o
a-S
I jz t,I
-75I
I
j
o
I Ltd
a
1
70
Fo:i �-
i
I
i
j !•
;
I
i 1
z a-S I
!-
a
rP-
I
Ss, 3
�-
i
'See attached map provided by the Field Of ice for field loca�on(s).
'Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
'Use the folfovMg abbreviations for various arc patiems. F (ill circle), TQ (three quarters), l i (�,vo thirds), H. (halt circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also:use degree of arc in degrees.
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
October 1995 page-2 North Carolina
�c

UP"
'Y
VIA I

SUL & ANWR
Orange Soil & Water PO Box 8181
Conservation District Hillsborough, NC 27278
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
FAX TRANSMITTAL, COVER SHEET
DATE:
TO: J-D �e s�e r
RE: CI
FAX NO.: 9/ct- 5-71- 4J 7/8
FROM: ORANGE SWCD --
FAX #: [phone]
(94 / 4 /7 ley 41 5
This transmission consists of pages including
cover sheet.
COMMENTS:
C9u
ZO/10 'sd W09 9117Tt96i61ZZZ0101<-- use 390H 6991 ZU 616 111df1:90 ZO/9Z/10

SOIL &WATER.
CONS EPVAT ION
Draage Soil and Water Conservation District
306 Revere Road • P.0, Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 2727E • Phone: [phone] a Ext. 2750
Fax: [phone]
I.0 Division of Water Resources
JD Hester
FROM: Brent Bogue, NRC;S District Conservationist
Carl Hughes, Solt and Water Conservationist &Q
Itl{; Request fur I".xtenston for
Gates Brothers Poultry I'arrrr Lagoon Closure
The progress on the lagoon closure for the Gates Brothers I'millry Farm :s going
well. According to the records, Mr. and Mrs. Clayton, owners, have Dumped
approximately 4.2 million gallons of liquid from the kgobn. Our agency has been
monitoring the licluid levels monthly since Feb. 28, 2001 . From the December records,
the current liquid level was 2.4 feet below maximum liquid level (averaging 4.4 feet
below the top of the dam), therefore-, there is not a threat of overflow,
On Dec 19, 2001, Mr. Clayton, 130gue, Hughes, JD Fester, and John 1 iunt reel at the
farm to discuss the progrec5 and the need for an extension of time for the closure process.
All parties agreed that an extension is deeded to allow for proper clean out of the
rCl-naining liquid, and the solids, ,We all agreed a six-month extension, weat.hcr
permitting, sl}ottld be adequate to complete the project. If the clnsa_rre is not complete on
or before August 1, 2002, there will be a review with our agency and DWO, and Mr.
C'iayton to determine if additional time is needed to complete the job
Ifyou have any quCstions or concerns, please feel free to call c ur Ake at 919-245-2750.
ZO/ZO 'sd W09 3101L96161ZZZ0101<- use 990110 699Z ZU 616 wa71:90 Z1]/OUTO

1. NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 '00 16:16 P.01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLrA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
F.O. Box 629
Raielgh, N. C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
F.4.X TM.N SvIISSIOr SUEET
DATE:
R.ECIP] N-T MINIM:
FAX: 5­71
TELEPB 0'.S�t:
PAGES: {LNCI_UDLNG COVER SHEET):
lr your receipt of this transmission is in error. please notik- us b. telephone and return the ori- nal message
by returm mail at the above address.
FROM: �17
MESSAGE:
F.k= AT

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
• �� • Feb 28 ' 00 16 :16 P. 02
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
COUNTY OF ORANGE (t �l:.t} "� r c {� 00 CVS c ��
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,te`�cxel.
MICI TAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney Z,'! �,- ),4,
General and ex rel., BILL, HOLMAN, )
Secretary, North Carolina Department of )
Environment, and N atural )
Resources, )
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
Plaintiff, ) :� ORDER
MJKE CLAYTON d/bfa GATES )
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM }
Defendant. )
This matter came on for hearing before the undersigned Judge of the Superior Court upon
the motion of the State of North Carolina for a Temporary Restraining Order. Having considered
the verified Complaint and Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for
Injunctive Relief filed by the State, the Court makes the following;
FINDINGS OF FACT
1- ' Plaintiff is the sovereign State of North Carolina. This action was brought on the
relation of Bill Holman, Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(hereinafter referred to as "DENX), the State agency established pursuant to N-C. Gen Stat.
143B-775, et seq., azxd vested with the statutory authority to enforce the State's environmental
pollution laws, including laws enacted to protect the water quality of the State. This action was
also brought on the relation of Michael F. Easley pursuant to his cor=on law power as Attorney
General to.bring civil actions to abate public nuisances. N.C. Gen Stat. 114-1-1.

NC ATTY GEN CONS PRAT Fax:[phone] Feb 28 '00 16:16 P.03
2. The defendant, Mike Clayton, is the owner and operator of a poultry growing
farm operation known as the Gates Brothers Poultry Farm which is located in Orange County,
North Carolina.
3. The Superior Court has jurisdiction of this action for injunctive relief for existing
or threatened violations of various laws and rules governing the protection of water resources
pursuant to N.C_ Gen. Stat. §§ 7A-245 and 143-215•6C, and North Carolina's common law of
public nuisance.
4. Orange County is a proper venue for this action because the violations or
threatened violations which are The subject of this action for injunctive.relief have occurred, are
occurring, and may occur in Orange County,
5. KC, Gen. Stat. § 143-215.1 forbids any person to "make outlets into the waters of
the state" unless the person has a permit to do so issued by the Environmental Management
Comnnission (the "EMU)." N.C. Gent. Stat. § 143-215.1(a)(1) .
6. More specifically, N.C. Gen. $tat. § 143-215.10C provides that no person may
construct or operate azi animal waste management system for an animal operation without first
obtaining either an individual permit or a general permit from the EMC. An "animal waste
management system" is defined as "a combination of structural and non-structural practices
which will properly collect, treat, store or apply animal waste to the land such that no discharge
of pollutants occurs to surface waters of the State by any means except as a result of a storm
event more severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm." 15A NCAC 2H.020S(3).
7. Subchapter 2H.0200 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (the
"non -discharge rules") establishes the requirements and procedures for application and issuance

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Feb 28 '00 16:17 P.04
of permits for waste disposal systems, including animal waste management systems, which are
not authorized to make any discharge to the surface waters of the State.
8. The -EMC has developed a Poultry Waste Operation General Permit for poultry
operations (the "General Permit"). An applicant for a Certificate of Coverage under the General
Permit must apply on forms provided by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) of DENR and
include with the application an "animal waste management plan" certified by a technical
specialist designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-
215.1OC(d)- A certified animal waste management plan must contain the animal waste
management practices or combination of practices which are selected to comprise a plan for a
specific feedlot. 15A NCAC 2H-0217(a)(1)(H)(i). The certified animal waste management plan
is incorporated by reference into the General Permit issued to a farm operator. The purpose of
the animal waste plan and the General Perrnit is to assure that the public health, safety and
welfare are adequately protected from farm operations. Included in the plan are performance
and operations standards and requirements that assure that the poultry operations will be
carefully designed and operated in a mariner to accomplish their purpose. Siting of waste
lagoons and spray irrigation fields and the establishing of proper ftreeboard levels for the lagoons
are critical in the design process to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of
North Carolina.
9. The EMC has delegated to the Director of the DWQ the authority to issue
individual non -discharge permits and certificates of coverage under the animal waste
management system general permit. N.C. Gen- Stat. § 143-215.3(a)(4); 15A NCAC 2H.0209.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PRET Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 100 16:17 P.05
10. Whenever DENR has reasonable cause to believe that any person has violated or
is threatening to violate any of the provisions of the State's environmental laws or administrative
rules, including State water quality laws and rules, DENR is authorized to "request the Attorney
General to institute a civil action in the name of the State upon the relation of DENR} for
injunctive relief to restrain the violation or threatened violation," and, "the court shall grant the
relief necessary to prevent or abate the violation or threatened violation." N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-
215.6C.
11. Under the common law of North Carolina, the Attorney General has the power
and authority to file a civil action on behalf of the citizens of the State to abate a public nuisance
affecting the public health, safety or welfare.
12, The defendant owns and operates the Gates Brothers Poultry Farm ("the Farm")
which is located on State Road 1524, also known as Holly Ridge Road, near the intersection of
State Road 1524 and State Highway 57 in Orange County, North Carolina.
13. The poultry farm includes several poultry houses and an animal waste
management system consisting of a lagoon and sprayfields on which the animal waste from the
lagoori is sprayed. The maximum liquid level for the lagoon is approximately 5,040,52.3 gallons.
The waste management system for the poultry operation is designed for a maximum capacity of
60,000 egg -laying hens.
14. Defendant filed an application with DENR for a General Permit for the Farm.
The application was received by DWQ on April 1, 1999. As required, a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plaza ("CAWMP") was filed with the application. A Certificate of Coverage
("COC") under the General Permit was issued to defendant Mike Clayton on May 21, 1999. The
0

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Feb 28 '00 16:17 P.06
COC provided that the defendant is "required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP and this
COC......
15. The General Permit issued to Mike Clayton incorporated by reference the
CAWMP that was obtained for the Farm on March 11, 1999. Cordition I(2) of the General
Permit provides that any violations of the CAWMP .is a violation of the General Permit and
subject to enforcement action.
16. Condition V(3) of the General permit requires that the maximum waste level in
the lagoons shall not exceed that specified in the Certified Animal- Waste Management Plan.
Condition V(3) further requires that, at a minimum, the waste level for the lagoon established in
the CAWMP cannot exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25-year, 24-
hour storm event plus an additional 1 foot of structural freeboard.
17. The dam for the lagoon at the Farm has an emergency spillway which allows
animal waste and wastewater to flow from the lagoon before it overtops. Because of the
spillway, the CAWMP for the Farm establishes the maximum liquid level in the lagoon to be two
(2) feet below the top of the dam. This requirement is set out in The Operation and Maintenance
Plan of the CAWMP_ The two (2) feet between the top of the dam and the maxim= waste
level is referred to as "freeboard."
18. Condition 111(5) of the General Permit requires that records of land application
events and solids removed to an offsite location be maintained in chronological and legible form
for a minimum of three years and be kept readily available for inspection.
5

NC RTTY GEN CONS PRAT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 ' 00 16 : 17 P. 07
19. Condition 111(6) of the General permit requires that the permittee report by
telephone to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Offices as soon as possible, but
no more than 24 hours following the first knowledge, the following occurrences:
a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage, and
land application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters.
b. Any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system that renders the
facility incapable of adequately receiving, treating or'�tofing the animal waste and/or sludge.
d. Any deterioration or leaf in a lagoon/storage pond that.poses an immediate threat
to the environment_
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal
to that required in Condition V(3) of this General Permit.
g. Any discharge that bypasses a lagoon/storage pond resulting in a discharge into
surface waters or that poses a serious threat to the environment.
20. Since July of 1995, at least sixteen inspections of the Farm have been made by
employecs of the Division of Water Quality or the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. Of
those sixteen inspections, Defendant Mike Clayton was found by inspectors to have inadequate
freeboard on fourteen occasions, Nine of these inspections have taken, place since the issuance of
the Certificate of Coverage to operate under the General Permit.
21. During an inspection on May 27, 1999, inspectors found that the defendmt had
inadequate freeboard in the lagoon and that approximately six inches of soil had been added to
C.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 '00 16:18 P.08
the height of the spillway as it had been originally designed. Since defendant had only six
inches of freeboard below the spillway during that inspection, a discharge could have occurred if
the spillway had been at its original designed level. The comments section of the report
instructed defendant to lower the waste level and return the spillway to its original design. A,
copy of the report was given to the defendant on the day of the inspection.
22. During the May 27, 1999 inspection, violations were also noted for failure to
install a gauged waste -level marker in the lagoon and"f4lure to keep adequate records.
23. Follow-up inspections on June 17, 1999 and June 21, 1999 found the freeboard
levels in the lagoon to be one inch and zero inches, respectively, below ttte spillway. Since the
extra soil which had been added to the spillway had not been removed at the time of these
inspections, defendant's lagoon would have been discharging waste and wastewater into the
environrnent if the spillway was at its original design level. The inspector again noted "the
spillway must be improved."
24. During the June follow-up inspections, violations for lack of a gauged waste -level
marker and failure to keep adequate records were noted. The report further notes that a sludge
and litter pile, composed of material removed from the bottom of one of the poultry houses, was
on site approximately 150 feet from a stream. The report warns defendant that a discharge into
the stream from the sludge and litter pile would be a violation.
25. As a result of the inspections in June of 1999, Defendant was sent a letter, dated
June 25, 1999, informing, hire that enforcement action was being contemplated by DENR.
Defenda,rit's response to the June 25th letter, dated July 7, 1999, states that he had not understood
that he was to return the Spillway to its original design. Defendant indicated that a
7

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 '00 16:18 P.09
representative of the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District was to come to his
facility on July 8, 1999, and "we are going to fix the spillway back to its original design." On
February 23, 2000, an Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District employee informed
DWQ that as of that date it had not assisted defendant in restoring the spillway to its original
design.
26. During an inspection on August 4, 1999, inspectors found that the freeboard level
at the Farm was adequate. The inspector measured theIeboard at 10 inches below the original
design level of the spillway, i,e., 22 inches total.
27. A complete inspection of Defendant's poultry operation was last performed on
September 20, 1999. The report noted that Tropical Storm Floyd had been through the area and
that the waste level in the lagoon was within six inches of the elevated spillway. Additionally,
violations were noted for the continued failure to have a lagoon gauge to measure waste level,
inadequate record keeping and the presence of trash iz) the lagoon.
28. The lack of adequate freeboard in the lagoon noted on the September 20, 1999
report was, in part, due to Tropical Storm Floyd. Defendant requested, and received from
DWQ, permission to pump wastewater from the lagoon. Defendant said that he planned to pump
tkie evening of the inspection to lower the liquid level in -the lagoon.
29. During an inspection on November 3, 1999, inspectors found that the freeboard
level was 14 inches below the top of the dam. The report notes this level of storage is less than
adequate and urges Defendant to "pump down ASAP as Fescue pumping windows end in Dec."
30. On February 7, 2000, a limited inspection of the Farm by an employee of the
Division of Water Quality to check the lagoon level found that there was no freeboard in the
8

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 ' 00 16 : 18 P. 10
lagoon and that a discharge of waste of about one gallon per minute was occurring from the
lagoon via the spillway. The discharge from the lagoon flowed through a pasture and into an
unnamed creek 250 yards from the discharge point. The u=amed creek is a "water of the State"
within the meaning of the State's water quality laws. 1f the discharge was unreported, and not
approved it would be another violation.
31. Dining the inspection on February 7, 2000, the inspector further observed another
source of contaminated runoff from the Farm into the'waters of the State. Stored poultry litter,
which had been removed from the bottom of the poultry houses and which Defendant had been
wanted about in June, 1999, had mixed with snowmelt and was entering, the same creek that was
receiving runoff from the lagoon.
32. Samples of the discharges from the lagoon and from the poultry house litter, both
taken before the discharges entered the creek, showed levels of az=onia, a form of nitrogen, that
are toxic to aquatic life. The levels of other forms of nitrogen and of phosphorous in the samples
were such that discharge to streams would promote the growth of algae bloom. When algae
bloom dies, it depletes the level of dissolved oxygen in the water which is needed for aquatic life.
33. On February 14, 2000, a limited inspection of the Farm by an employee of the
Division of Water Quality to check the lagoon level found that, again, there was nz freeboard in
the lagoon and that the discharge of waste from the lagoon spillway had incre=ed to about two
gallons per minute. The discharge from the lagoon continued to flow through pasture and into an
unnamed creek 250 yards fFom the discharge point, as it had on February 7.
26

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Feb 28 '00 16:19 P.11
34- Based on the increased amount of discharge occurring through the spillway on
February 14, 2000, and on the elevated height of the spillway, the struc=al integrity of the
lagoon was threaterted.
35. The defendant Failed to notify the Division of Water Quality of the inadequate
freeboard or of the overtopping of the lagoons in February, 2000, as required by his Gerkeral
Permit.
..-
36. On February 23, 2000, a limited inspebtion of the Farm by an employee of the
Division of Water Quality to check the lagoon level found that, still, there was nQ freeboard in
the lagoon and that the discharge of wastewater continued. The wastb from the lagoon followed
a well-defined path to the unriamed creek. Defendant stated he had been unable to spFay waste of
the fields to lower the level of the lagoon because his irrigation equipment was broken. While
defendant had obtained the parts to repair the equipment, the equipment had not been used that
day.
37, During the February 23, 2000, inspection, the inspector observed that defendant
had begun to remove some of the litter and sludge pile from which a discharge had occurred on
February 7, 2000. However, the majority of the pile first noted during the inspection of the site
on June 17, 1999 remained in place.
3$. During the February 23, 2000, inspection, defendant promised to submit by
facsimile copies of the waste application records for the month of Febmary, 2000. On February
25, 2000 DWQ received a facsimile stating that the last waste application was 19,800 gallons on
February 16, 2000. Despite this application, inspectors found that the lagoon continued to
discharge through the spillway on F'ebruwy 23, 2000,
10

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 '00 16:19 P.12
39. The volume of waste in Defendant's lagoon and the discharge occurring from it
are not the result of a storm event more severe than a 25-year, 24-hour storm. Defendant's
CANVMP allows Defendant to apply waste to crops from February through May and September
through November. Following Tropical Storm Floyd, Defendant has had ample opportunity to
lower the lagoon to the level required by his CAWMP.
40. The volume of animal waste in the lagoon at the Farm is over Iave million
(5,000,000) gallons. The constant failure to maintain adequate freeboard, the alteration of the
spillway and the continued flow of waste through the spillway greatly increases the risk that the
lagoon will fail. If the lagoon fails, waste would flow into the creek gird then to the South Flat
and Neuse Rivers. The creek and rivers are waters of the State and this situation constitutes an
immediate threat to the State's surface waters.
41, The inadequate freeboard in defendant's lagoon poses a threat of continued and
unlawful discharges to the waters of the State. The poultry on the defendant's fann continue to
produce waste which is added to defendant's lagoon, which is discharging waste and in danger of
failing. The defendant has continually failed to maintain the proper amount of freeboard in the
lagoon.
42. The defendant's CAWMP provides that actions which may be taken to address
lagoon overflow include, inter alia, the pumping of waste at acceptable rates, stopping flows to
the lagoon immediately and adding soil to the bernt of the dam to increase its elevation.
43 _ The defendant has failed to provide the Division of Water Quality with a
sufficient plan or proposal on how the required freeboard will be restored and maintained in the
near future, These plans are grossly inadequate because neither plan establishes a specific
11

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Feb 28 '00 i6:19 P.13
method for dealing with the waste nor provides a time table within, which the remedial work will
done.
44. in order to aileviate the threat posed by the unsafe condition of the defendant's
lagoon, the discharge from defendant's lagoon must be stopped and the lagoon level must be
reduced. To accomplish this, an emergency plan to reduce the waste in the lagoon must be
implemented and the number of poultry at the Farm must be reduced until, the defendant is able
/ .�
to comply with the Farm's CAWNP and the General'Pexmtit by reducing the waste level to at
least 2 feet below the top of the dam.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
45. Defendant's certified animal waste management plan and the General Permit
require that the minimum freeboaid that must be maintained is 24 inches. This includes storage
capacity to hold the. 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus additional freeboard needed to maintain
the structural integrity of the lagoon. Defendant is in, violation of the State's water quality laws
and administrative rules, its certified animal waste management plan and General Permit because
defendant, inter alia, (1) failed to maintain adequate records of its operations, (2) failed to
maintain the required minimum lagoon freeboard; (3) discharged poultry waste and wastewater
from its lagoon and litter piles into the waters of the State; (4) maintained and continues to
maintain its lagoon, in a condition which poses a serious threat of future discharges of swine
waste into the waters of the State, and (5) failed to notify the State of past discharges when they
occurred and inadequate freeboard levels as required by its certified animal waste management
plan and General Permit.
12

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 ' 00 16 :19 P. 14
46. The lack of adequate freeboard poses a serious threat of rupture of the lagoon
structure and discharge of animal waste into the waters of the State -- in violation of State law --
unless immediate corrective action is taken. The risk of such a discharge increases as more waste
is added to the lagoon. Such a discharge would cause immediate and irreparable injury and
damage to the water quality of the State. For these reasons, the State is entitled to a temporary
restraining order, a preliminary injunction andsrnnanent injunctive relief that Compels
defendant to bring its farm into cornpl4mce with the li�w`� N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-215.6C.
47. The cozrtinued operation of the Farm and its lagoon without adequate freeboard is
causing and continues to cause: (a) serious danger to the public health, .safety and welfare of the
people of North Carolina; and (b) serious harm to the land and water resources of the State,
thereby constituting a public nuisance. Such operation should be stopped until the nuisance has
been abated.
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and such mixed
findings to the extent that they are both fact and law, the Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order is hereby GRANTED. It is, therefore, ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
i. That the Court accepts the verified Complaint as an affidavit upon which to base
orders of the Court.
2. That the Defendant Mille Clayton, shall:
(a) prevent any further discharges of artimal waste or wastewater into the
waters of the State;
(b) within 15 days of service of this temporary restraining order, dispose of or
properly store, in arx environmentally safe manner, all litter and sludge
13

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Feb 28 ' 00 16 :20 P. 15
piles on site using a method approved, in writing, by the Division of Water
Quality prior to such disposal or storage;
(c) immediately remove all poultry from the Farm;
(d) lower the level of the liquid impounded in its lagoon to 18 inches below
the top of the darn within 5 days of receipt of the initial plan of action
referenced in Paragraph 2 (f below and bring the lagoon freeboard to 24
inches below the top of the dam,within 30 days of the receipt of the second
plan of action referenced in Paragraph 2 (g) below, and, thereafter, (1)
maintain the freeboard level in accordance's with defendant's certified
animal waste management plan and General Permit, and (2) install
monitoring equipment designed to measur�e_thg Ia;aoA,qujd level and
alb _defendant when,the_liquid_reaches-a_critical,leveh
(e) cease operating the Farm as a poultry operation until defendant comes into
full compliance with the law, its certified animal waste management plan
and General Permit iricluding, but not limited to, the maintenance of all
required records;
(f) within 24 hours of the service of the temporary restraining order, file with
the Court an initial plan of action, acceptable to the State, which sets forth
(1) a timetable and the steps defendant will take to obtain 18 inches of
freeboard in the lagoon within 5 days; and (2) a schedule for complete
depopulation of animals from the farm;
14

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Feb 28 '00 16:20 P.16
(g) within 48 hours of the service of the temporary restraining order, file with
the Court a second plan of action, acceptable to the State, which sets forth
a timetable and the steps defendant will take to obtain 24 inches J of
freeboard in the lagoon within 30 days; and
(h) contemporaneously serve on plaintiff's counsel all plans and schedules
filed with the Court as required;in Paragraphs 2 (f) and (g).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing ll be held in the Superior Court for Orange
County on the 'l day of fit---z4- , 2000, at f,''7J < . tn., or as soon thereafter as
the matter .may be heard, to determine whether the terms of this'Order should continue and
whether such further relief as sought in the Complaint should be granted.
h
This the 2�' day of Eel� , 2000, at /u Gt. m.
Superior Court Judge
oe-
-�. A
15

1
NCDENR
NCKT" CAROUNA DcrMJInwxTor
rLptvt 3"mw T ANO NAruRm-RmsouRc"
NEW MAILING ADDRESS:
RALEIGH REGIONAL
OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OF
rr. EN1lIRONt+tENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1 628
PHYSICAL LOCAMON (SQj A.
MAILING ADDRESS)
3B40 BARR= DRIVE, RM 1-0I
RALEIGH, NC 27609
VOICE: 9 1 9/57 1-4700
FAX: [phone]
F
A
x
r'_
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW
MAILING ADDRESS ! ! !
TO � L Tt.�r� .. -71 1* sow s
TO: FAX;
FROM: U,J uJ QL
SUBJECTS __ Cc. {L�{'Tbrf ^_ DATE--
P L 4J CP- A crT on1
MESSAI;E:
A r __f T_ A- Kf—c-jEtrlLy W
'oA Duj a A,Jb Z.'(-J. - a a4L crlA-' r— eacJS� V,
Tio f� �J E iF T`Ae- us,(Ec--r' rE
cA.J Q e kE-T _

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID):
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a.
current liquid level according to marker
inches
b.
designed structural freeboard zone
inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c.
line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) =
inches
d.
top of dike surface area according to design
ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e.
line c x line d x 7.48 gallons =
gallons
12 ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f.
temporary storage period according to structural design
days
g.
volume of waste produced according to structural design
ft3
h.
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
ft3
certified herd #
i.
volume of wash water according to structural design
ft3
j.
excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
ft3
k.
(lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 5 days =
gallons
line f
4. Total
volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I.
total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
gallons
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
PoA (5 Day) 2/21100 1

11. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
2. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
3. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
4. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
5. structure ID:
line I =
gallons
6. structure ID:
fine I =
gallons
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = gallons
o. line n = acre -inches
27,154
Ill. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD',2
While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan
2 Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste
p. tract #
q. field #
r. soil type
S. crop
t. acres
u. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
v. maximum
application
rate (in/hr)
w. maximum
application
amount
(inches)
x. total acres available during 5 day draw down (sum of column t) = acres
PoA (5 Day) 2/21/00 2

IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
Y. line o =
line x
inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new information.
Plan to land apply hydraulic load:
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e.g./ Is there water standing in field; does irrigation
equipment mar down in field; "trafficability" across soils; will soils absorb application without runoff ,
etc.)
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event?
3. Dates of last waste application event per field
4. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, is irrigation equipment capable of applying the
volume in line "n" at appropriate seasonal (i.e. winter) application rates within five days?
5. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include daily schedule; proposed application rates and
amounts per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel
speed, etc. to meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts; and any other information
for consideration
PoA (5 Day) 2121100 3

FROM RO1INIE P. KIWa, P,R. P770RNEY 02.29.2960 I6:46 P. I
i�
RONNIE P. KING, P.A.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P. 0. BOX 1195
ROXBORO, NC 27573
336-599-2115
Fax:[phone]
FAX COVER SHEET
FAX NUMBER TRANSMITTED TO: 919-571-4718
To: JOHN HUNT
From: RONNIE P. KING, P.A,
Client/Matter: MIKE CLAYTON - ORANGE COUNTY
Date: February 29, 2000
DOCUMENTS
INITIAL PLAN OF ACTION
NUMBER OF PAGES`
COMMENTS:
ATTACHED IS THE INITIAL PLAN OF ACTION TO BE FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT TODAY,
Ronnie King
*NOT COUNTING COVER SHEET, IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE TELEPHONE US
IMMEDIATELY AT 336-599-21 15

FROM FONNIE F. KiN6, P.A. ATTOP.NEV
02.29.2000 11:47
P. 2
NORTH CAROLINA
ORANGE COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel,
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attomey
General and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN,
Secretary, North Carolina Department of
Environmental, and Natural
Resources,
Plaintiff
VS.
MIKE CLAYTON dlbla GATES
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM
FILE # 00 CVS 257
FILM #
GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
INITIAL PLAN OF ACTION
Now comes the Defendant, Mike Clayton, and files the following "INITIAL PLAN OF
ACTION" per the TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER issued by the court on February 28,
2000,
ACTION TO LOWER LAGOON LEVEL TO ESTABLISH 18 INCHES OF FREEBOARD
WITHIN S DAYS:
a), Defendant will pump water from the lagoon with current irrigation equipment each
day pumping is permitted under the environment department guidelines until the lagoon is at the
proper level.
b). Defendant will secure additional irrigation pump and piping to pump water from the
lagoon each day pumping is permitted under the environment department guidelines until the
lagoon is at the proper level.
c). Defendant has employed Jerry McCullock who has agreed to use a track hoe to
remove sludge from the lagoon beginning on Thursday, March 2, 2000. Sludge removed from
the pond will be stockpiled in accordance with applicable environmental guidelines to protect
from any run off.

FROM RONNIE g. KING. F.a. ATTORI{EY 02.29.2000 16:4F. 3
1
f 2.
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETE DEPOPULATION OF ANIMALS FROM FARM
5
A) Defendant has secured a processor that can slaughter 6,500 of the chickens located
on the farm by March 5, 2000.
B) Defendant will continue to look for processors that can accept the Defendant's
i
chickens,
C) Defendant will have the entire chicken population disposed of and the operation
j closed on or before April 30, 2000.
This February 29, 2000.
RONNIE P. KING, PA
Ronnie P. King
Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 1195
Roxboro, N. C. 27573
336-599-2115
State Bar # 2537

FRO1l BONNIE F
r
i
KINri, P.G. ATTORNEY
NORTH CAROLINA
ORANGE COUNTY
02.29.200�3 15:48
i 1, Mike Clayton, first being duly sworn, depose and say:
j l am the Defendant in the above entitled action; that I have read the foregoing Initial
Plan of Action and the (natters and things therein alleged are true to the best of my knowledge
and constitute a plan of action that I believe will bring my lagoon in compliance with the State
Environmental laws,
Mike Clayton �^
NORTH CAROLINA
I ORANGE COUNTY
a Notary Public of the aforesaid State and County, do hereby
i
certify that Mike Clayton did personally appear before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the 29th day of February, 2000.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
I
P. 4

FROM NC GTTY GEN CONSUMER PROTECTION
a. Ppo" RDRNIE R. KIND, P.q. RTTORNCY
03.08.2000 e9:35
P. 2
NORTH CAROLINA
URANUS COUNTY
81-ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex ml,
MICHAE� F, E'ASLEY, Attorney
General wA ex rol., BILL HOLMAN,
Secratary,,North Carolina Deptuttrant of
Envieonmanlal, and Natural
Reaourcea,
PIain6ff
vs,
MIKE CL,pYTON ft/a GATES
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM
FILE # 00 CVS 257
FILM #�
GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUP WORCOURTDIVISION
30 DAY PLAN OF ACTION
Now comes the Defendant, M[ke Clayton, and files the following "INITIAL PLAN OF
ACTION" per the TEMPORARY RBSTRAININO ORDER Jawed by the court on February 26,
20W
1.
ACTION TO IA)WPR LAOODN LEVEL TO ESTABLISH 24 INCHES OF FREEBOARD
WITIIlN ,10 DAYS:
a), D*ndant will pump watar from the lagoon with current irrigation equipment each
day pumping is permitted under the envlronment department guidelines until the le,goon Is at the
proper level. Data shoots to be supplied within 10 days.
0)• Dofendant hu eeaurod en Wditional itTigalion pump and piping to rump water from
the lagoon each day pumping 1s permitted undot the onvironmau department guidelines until the
lagoon is at the proper level.
o). Deibrldani hits employed Jerry McCullock who is purrently on site, using it track hoe
to remove sludge from the lagoon. Sludge rtntovo¢ from tiro pond will be itockplled in
accordance with applitable envlronmonW guidelines to protect Porn any run off.
---- — �.+Ell** ...

FROM NC RTTY GEN CONSUMER PROTECTION
03.08.2000 09:35 P. 3
03.9?. 2001 11127 P. 2
2.
SCHEDULE FOR COMPT.M D$PONULATTON OP ANIMALS FROM FARM
r} _ crc:TMc ce:sor thAl out. slaughter L,S'vJ ofiien uuiukCns loaawd
Oh the NMI by March 3, 2000.
D) Dcibndgnt will remove an addldonW 24,500 chlokens by Muth 13, 2000.
Cj Defendant %ill have the rmtiro olilckem populatimn dIRMAW n.f thR n—±Vo
olnaad nn nr beibry April 30, 2(if10.
This March 1, 2000,
RONME P, KING, PA
Ronnie P. King
Attornoy at Lew
P. 0. Box 1195
RoAm. N. C. 27573
330-S99-21lS
State Bar g 2537
1
�M�END�r•
***END*+*

"NUM NC RTT4 GEN CONSUMER PROTECTION
03.08.2000 04:35
P. I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
FAX TRANSMiI SION SHEET
March /f, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME: Mr. John Hunt
COMPANY: DENR Raleigh Regional Office
FAX: [phone]
PHONE; $71-4700
PAGES: 3 (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
RE- Gates Bros. Poultry Farm
If your receipt of this transmission is to error, please notify us by telephone and return the original message
by return mail at the above address.
FROM: Philip A. Tclfer, Special Deputy Attorney General
MESSAGE: Attached is 2nd Plan of Action filed in Orange County. I'll give you a call
to discuss later today.
U

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Mar 2 ' 00 11 : 55 P. 01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.O. Bost 629
Raleigh, N-C, 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
March 2, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME:
Mr. John Hunt
COMPANY:
DENR Raleigh Regional Office
FAX:
571-4718
PHONE:
571-4700
PAGES:
4 (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
RE:
Gates Bros. Poultry Farm
If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify us by telephone and return the on&al message
by return mail at the above address.
FROM: Philip A. Telfer, Special Deputy Attoracy General
MESSAGE: John: Attached is Initial Plan of Action. Although it isn't signed, this is
what they indicated was filed,

NC RTTY GEN CONS PRCT Fax:[phone]
FpCm RONN E P. KING, P.R. QT70R4E4
r:
y.
NO TH CAROLINA
OR GECOUNTY
ST TE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rei,
MI HAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney
Get eral and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN,
Se etary, North Carolina Department of
Ent 'ronmental, and Natural
VS.
Plaintiff
CLAYTON dlbla GATES
HERS POULTRY FARM
Mar 2 '00 11:55
a2.29.2800 16:52
P. 02
FILE # 00 CVS 257
FILM #
GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DMSION
INITIAL PLAN OF ACTION
Now comes the Defendant, Mike Clayton, &nd files the following "INITIAL Pl AN OF
A ON" per the TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER issued by the court on February 28,
1.
'ION TO LOWER LAGOON LEVEL TO ESTABLIS}I 18 INCHES OF FREEBOARD
'HIN 5 DAYS:
a). Defendant will pump water from, the lagoon with current irrigation equipment each
pumping is pens nitted under the environment department guidelines until the lagoon is at the
+er level.
b). Defendant will secure additional irrigation pump and piping to pump wafer from the
on each day pumping is permitted under the environment department guidelines until the
-on is at the proper level.
c). Defendant has employed Jerry McCullock wino has agreed to use a track hoe to
sludge from the lagoon beginning on Thursday, March 2, 2000 Sludge removed from
d will be stockpiled in accordance with applicable environmental guidelines to protect
any run off,
P. 2

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
FROM RONNI
E P. KING. P.A. ATTORNEY
Mar 2 ' 00 11 : 55
02.25.20ee 16;33
P. 03
P. 3
W
2,
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETE DEPOPULATION OF ANLMALS FROM FARM
A) Defendant has secured a processor that can slaughter 6,500 of the chickens located
on he farm by Mucli 5, 2000.
H) Defendant will continue to look for processors that can accept the Defendant's
chi kens.
Q Defendant will have the entire chicken population disposed of and the operation
c10 ed on or before April 30, 2000.
This February 29, 2000.
RONNIE P. ICTNC, PA
Ronni a P. King
Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 1195
Roxboro, N, C. 27573
336-599-2115
State Bar 9 2537

NC PTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
ROM ROHNDI P. KINCI, P.A. ATTaRNEY
Mar 2 ' 00 11 : 55 P. 04
62,29,2E00 16,53
P, 4
Q
TH CAROLINA
NGE COUNTY
1, Mike Clayton, first being duly sworn, depose and say;
am the Defendant in the above entitled action; that I have read the foregoing Initial
P11 of Action and the matters and things therein alleged arc true to the best of my knowledge
an constitute a plan of action that I believe will bring my lagoon in compliance with the Stan
n ironmental laws.
Mike Clayton
RTH CAROLINA
ANGE COUNTY
I, !_ _, a Notary Public of the aforesaid State and County, do hereby
fy that Mike Clayton did personally appear before me this day and acknowledged the due
u6on of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official seal, this the 29th day of February, 2000.
Notary Public

.o�0 W A rFRQG
� r
November 21, 2002
Mr. Mike Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemont, NC 27572
Re: Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Permit Rescission
Permit # AWP680001
Dear Mr. Clayton,
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Per our phone conversation today, Permit # AWP680001 for your farm is hereby
rescinded. Thank you for closing the lagoons at the farm. You should no longer receive
invoices for your annual permit fee but if you do, please contact me at [phone], ext. 539
or Sue Homewood at [phone], ext. 502. .
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
cc: Sue Homewood
Fran McPherson
d D.:Hester,�Raleigh Regional Office
Farm file #68-1
Central Files
Customer Service: !Nailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #f52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enr, state. nc. us
NCDENR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. NC 27699-1617

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report r Water Quality
Q SAMPLEJ-YEE
COUNTY ORANGE
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
.� AMNIENI QA
STREAM
£FFLUENI-
REPORTT'O RRO Regional Office
COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
FI IERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTORi51 : HUNT
Lab Number
YWO649
Date Received:
2/8/2000
Time Received:
9:00 AM
Received By
DS
Data Released
AR
Date Reported:-
2/21/2000
Estimated BOD Ranae: Station Location: MIKE CLAYTON POULTRY
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station N Date Begin lyydmm/ddl Date cad lyyrmmrddi Time Begin Time End Depth - DAI, DB, D851 Value Type- A. 11, L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
M CLAYTON 20000207 1 1 1306
13013310 m /L
COD Ili t, 340 m /L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fetal 31616 /100mi
Coliform: MF Total 31504 / 100ml
Colifmm: tube Fetal 31615 /IOOml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /IOOm!
Residue: Total 500 m /L
Volatile 505 m L
Fired 510 mFZL
Residue: Suspended 330 m /L
Volatile535 m /L
Fixed 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to pit4.3 436 m /L
Acidity to pli 8.3 435 m /L
Alkalinity to H 8.3 415 m /L
Alkalinity to pH4,5410 m /L
TOC 6M m /L
Turbidit 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube '/100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: I ri 3221 i u L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheo hylin a 32213 u L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 EH= Cu.
Color. pli 7.6 82 C.U.-
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride 951 m L
Formaldchvdc 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 356 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L_
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MRAS 38260 m L
Phenols 327_0 u /L
Sul€ate945 m /L
Sulfide 745 m L
Boron
Tannin & Li in u /L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L
X
I NH3 as N 610
8.3
m /L
X
TKN an N 625
10
In/L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.84
m L
X
P: Total as P 665
3.4
m /L
PO4 as P 70507
m L
P: D'usolved as P 666
m L
K-Potassium
m /L
Cd-Cadmium 1027
ug/L
Cr-Chmmium:Toui 1034
ug/L
Cu- Copper T042
ug/L
Ni-Nickel1067
uj14L
Pb- Lead 1051
u /L
Zn- Zinc 1092
u /L
V-Vanadium
ug/ L
A - Silver 1077
ug/l.
AI -Aluminum 1105
ug/L
Ile Beryllium 1012
ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916
mg/L
Co. Cobalt 1037
ug/ L
Fc- Iron 1045
u /L
Li -Lithium 1132 u L
M Magnesium 927 /L
Mn-Maa nest 1055 u /L
Na- Sodium 929 MALL
ArsenicTotal1002 u L
Se- Selenium 1147 u L
Hg. Mercury 71900 uk/L
Ea. -Barium u L
Or nochlorine Pesticides
OrganophosphorusPesficides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Neuual&AcidExtracrabk0r nica
TPH Diesel Ran e
PUTSeable Organics (VOA bottle 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/B7EX Gasoline Range
MytoplankLon
1vIC
MAR I
r
�fHN� 1:,;lfliiH 1

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER Qt ALITY F -
B FORM
1)
COUNTY OR A J
PRIORITY
.: TYPE
,,r
RIVER r `" O u S £
❑ AMBIENT ❑
❑
j�
T TO-
REPORT TU: ARO >:RO MRU RO
aROWIROWSROTSAT
STREAM
N�EFFLUENT
BMCOMPLIANCE
A
CAIN
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
G— r.t, rI.. nut v
Lab Number:
Date Received - Time:
Rec'd b From: Bus-Courl!31land pe
DATA ENTRY BY: CK--
Other OF CUSTODY
Shipped by. pus Courier. Stall 1l6er ❑EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUAl1Y HATE REPORTED_
COLLECTOR{5►: cb a V ,,J T' C L-A 'I S0 STATION LOCATION: %ti'I t POU
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25125-65/40-130 or 100 plus i E
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ NoV REMARKS: y r3 E FGI, V,
5tatlon # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample Type
C) A 11 L T 5 B C G GNXX
1
DODS 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/I�
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /looml
5
Cotllorm: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /loom]
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
g
Residue: Total 500 mg/l
Volatile 505 mg/1
11Y
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pii 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pit 8.3 435 1119/1
17
` 18
Alkalinity to pit 8.3 415 mg/I
Alkalinity to pit 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOG 680 ' mg/l
20
1 Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Carr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pil 7.6 82 ADM]
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and 011s 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as'N 625 mg/I
/
NO2 plus NO3 ns N 630 mg/I
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
CrCINominm-Total1034 u9/1
Cu-Copper 1042 vg/I
Ni-Nickel 3067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-ZInc 1092 leg/1
Ag ilver 1077 ug/t
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1o12 ug/l
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 u9/1
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic -Total 1002 ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/1
Fig -Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
OrgancWhog400nts Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Valer Temperature (C)
D.O. mg/1
pfI
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 10
p118.3 pit 4.5
pH 4.5 pit 8.3
2
94
10
3011_�_
q00 1.
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipltlon (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction 0jes)
Stream now Scvcilty
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAI
Mean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Wklth IL
480
45
132
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

.'
v�
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Irhuralory Report / Wow Qualily
0 SAMPL£51PE
CO(INTY ORANGE
11910R1LY
RIVER BASIN:
.Y❑ AMBIENT a QA
STREAM
El EFFLUENT
REPORTTO RRO Regional Office
X J COMPLIANCE CHAINOFCUSTODY
LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other :
Ej EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : HUNT
I
Lab Nnmbcr
YW0650
Date Received:
2/8/2000
Time Received:
9.00 AM
Received By
DS
Data Released :
AR
Date Reported :
2121 /2000
Estimated BOD Range: Simian Location: MIKE CLAYTON
Seed: Chlorinaled: Remarks:
Station M Date Begin tyrlmmldd) Date End (yylmmldd) ='I'D
n Time End Depth - DAI, DB, DBhI Value Type - A. H, L Composite-T, S, 9 Sample Type
20=207
BOD 310 m L
COD High 340 m IL
COD Lou 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /loom]
Colirorm: tube Fecal 31615 /100m1
COIlform:Focal St 31673 /IDom]
Residue: Total 50D m /L
Volatile 505 m /L
Fixed 510 m /L
Residue: Sus nded 530 m /L
Volatile 535 m /L
Fixed 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to pH -1 5 436 mg+L
Acidity to pit 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH9.3415 m /L
Alkalinity to pit4.5410 m /L
TOC680 m /L
Turbidi 76 NTU
Coliform Tma1 Tube "/ t00 MIS
COMMENTS:
Chloride940 m /L
Chl a: Tri 32217 u /L
Chl a: Corr 32209 u /L
P h fin a 32213 u L
Color- True 80 C.U.
Color: (PH ) 83 pll= C.U.
Color: H 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L.
Fluoride 951 m L
FOrmaldchvdc 71880 m /L
Grease and Oils 556 m L
Hardness Total900 mg/L.
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/Cm2
WAS 33260 mg/L.
Phenols 32730 u !L
Sulfate 945 m /L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Moron
Tannin & Li in u /L
Flexavalent Chromium u /L
X
NH3 asN610
19
m L
R
TKN an N 625
79
m L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
a0.01
m /L
X
P: Total as P 665
100
m L
PO4 as P 70507
m L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m L
K-Pofasslum
m L
Cd. Cadmium 1027
u /L
Cfihromium:Total1034
u L
Cu- Copper 1D42
u /L
Ni-Nickel 1067
u /L
Pb Lead 1051
u L
Zn- Zinc 1092
u L
IV -Vanadium
u /L
Alt- Silver 1077
u /L
Al. Aluminum 1105
u /L
Be- 15cr yllium 1012
u /L
Ca- Calcium 916
m /L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u /L
Fe. Iron 1045
u /L
f?
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/L
Mg. MaAnium 927 m /L
Mn-Man nest 1055 u /L
Na- Sodium 929 m /L
ArsenicTotal1002 u L
Se -Selenium 1147 u /L
H Mercury 71900 u /L
Ba_Barium u L
nochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Arid Herbicides
Base/NeuvaWAcid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle re 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phytoplankton
7 WR 1 0 'rm 1
f
DEHNR RAtEtGN
RE_ GIOHIDNAI OFFICE tCE r.

L
i
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER ALITY E -LD-1
1:0 (M (1)M1)
COUNTY
PRIORITY
1'Lli T
RIVER B;I'_-❑AMBIENT
❑
❑
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO i O aR0 W)Ii0 WSRO TS
QA
STREAM EFFLUENT
COMPLIANCE
WCHAIN
❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other
Otheerr
❑
OF CUSTODY
❑
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Shipped by: Bus Courier, Staff Other
COLLECTOR(S): +-3 Ur r—
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yet ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No IN
STATION LOCATION- M' K-c Lt A q T-0 h
REMARKS: Po[4
Far lab Use ONLY
Lab Number
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd b : From: Bus-Courle,-4 and be
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Station #f
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth Ohl DB DBM
Value Type
Composite
Sample Type
— -
Ox-- , b-7 t oa
/y:�„ I
oz a-7 t �5
1y=►a
A H L
I
T S B
C
1
2
3
2(
BOD5 310 m9/1
COD High 340 mg/I
COD Low 335 mg/I
Colilorm: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500� mg/I
volatile 505 mg/1
Fixed 510 mg/1
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
Volatile 535 mg/I
Fixed 540 mg/I
pit 403 units
Acidity to pil 4.5 436 mg/I
Acidity to pit 9.3 435 mg/I
Alkalinity to pit 8.3 415 mg/I
Alkalinity to pil 4.5 410 mg/I
TOC 680 mg/l
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 u13/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Cotor:(Pll ) 83 ADMI
Color: pli 7.6 82 AI1M1
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 3273l) ug/1
Sulfate 946 rngA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
j
NH3 as N 610
mg/I
TKN as N 625
mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
mg/I
/
L
P: Total as P 665
mg/I
1104 as P 70507
mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666
tng/I
CdCadtnlum 1027
u9/1
Cr-Chromium:Total1034
ug/1
Cu-Copper 1042
ug/I
Ni-Nickel 1067
ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051
ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092
ng/1
Ag liver 1077
ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105
Be -Beryllium 1012
ug/I
ug/t
Ca -Calcium 916
mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045
ugA
Li-Llihlum 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 u11/1
hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophospborus Pesticides
Acid Ilerbk:kles
Rase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA battle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Putnt %
Conduclauce at 25 C
Water Temperature If
D-O. mgA
141
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
1418.3 1.114.5
pit 4.5 ph 8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400 1 0 182244
1431
82243 182242
20
Salinity R
Preclplllon pn/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Dlrectlon (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth fi.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
j 36
1351
1350
35
64
4

" DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report 1 Water Quarrty
` LabNumbcr YW1233
W� 5,%MPIFTYPE +�E+�f/� Y Date Received: 3/3/2000
COUNTi' 1.
RIVER BASIN :
ORANGE
PaiQgITy
AMBIENT
[7] QA
STREAM
�+/(/ In! �
X
I. -Time Received: 2:50 AM
i ,Received By IG
L
REPORT TO
RRQ Regional Office
COMPLIANCE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
[NFL
Other :
-
X� EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
'
Data Released :
AR
COLLECiOR(S) :
IOHN HURT
2
`
VV
Date Reported:
3/10/2000
Estimated DOD Range:
Station Location: MIKE CLAYTON FARM
Seed:
Chlorinated: N
Remarks:
Station N
Date HeSin (yyfmot/dd)
Date End (yylmmfdd)
Time Begin Time End
I Depth - DM, DB, DBM
Valve Type - A, El, L
Composite-T, S, B
Somple Typt
CLAYTON FARM
03/03/09
13:00
BOD 310 m L
COD High 340 m L
COD Low 335 L
Coliform: MF Fecal31616 /100m1
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100m1
Colifortn: tube Feral 31615 /100nd
Caliform: Foal S31673 /immi
Residue: Total 500 m L
Volatile505 m L
Feed 510 m L
Raidue: Suspended SV L
Volatile535 m /L
Fixed 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to pil 4.5 436 m L
Acidity to pil8.3435 m /L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 4I5 L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m L
TOC 680 m L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/ 100 MIS
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m L
Chl a: Tri 32217 u L
Chi a: Corr 32209 u L
Pheophytin a32213 u L
Color. True 80 c.u.
Color. H 83 PH= C.U.
Color pff 7.6 82 c.u.
Cyanide 720 nWL
Fluoridc951 m L
Formaldehyde 718W L
Grease and Oils 556 L
Hardness Tom] 900 nWL
SpocificCond.95 umhw/cm2
MDAS 38260 nWL
Phenols 32730 u /L
Sulfate 943 m L
Sulfide 745 m L
Boron
Tannin dt Ligain u L
HexavalentChromium u L
X
NH3 as N 610
20
m L
X
TKN an N 625
37
pjZL
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
<0.01
m L
X
P: Total as P 665
1.9
L
PO4 as P 70507
L
P: Dissolved as P 666
L
K-Potassium
m L
Cd-Cadmlum 1027
L
Cr- Chromium Total 1034
LqVL
Cu- 1042
u L
Ni-Nickel1067
u L
M Lead 1051
u L
Zn-Zinc 1092
u L
V-Vanadium
1-
AR- Silver 1077
u /L
AI -Aluminum 1105
u L
Be- Beryllium 1012
u L
Ca- Calcium 916
L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u L
Fe- Iron 1045
ugl L
LI-Lithium 1132
u
L
M& Magnesium 927
ECL
Mn-Manganese 1055
u
L
Na- Sodium 929
L
ArsenicTota11002
u
L
Se -Selenium 1147
u
L
H Mcwury 71900
u
L
Ba_Barium
u
L
OrgarmNorine Pesticides
Organwhosphorus Pesticides
Add Herbicides
Base/Neutral Acid ExtraaaMe Otpnk3
TPH Diesel Ran
PurgeablE OEp±g(VOA bottle
'd
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phytoplanlmoa

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATrEl "IJALIK,FIEyD LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY Rvt.s GT_ PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
i, R1VF1{ B SIN kz
R£PORVTO: ARO FRO MR RR WaRO WIRO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT El QA ❑STREAM EFFLUENT
ATiM ❑COMPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other
� OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier. is Ti`T ether EMERGENCY ❑ > STUARY
COLLECTOR(S): `J at r4 4OIJT
Estimated HOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65140-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: (V1. %E C--A kjTb4 FA -
Seed: Yet ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ NoEMARKS:
Station # Date Beginiiiiii(yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite T pe
C-L a- T o.S Ae rv� �ci c"� i a 3 L3 = o� t� �3 'b3 { 3 :p A H L T 5 B C G GNX)(
1
BODS 310
mg/I
COD High 340
mg/1
2
3
COD Low 335
mg/I
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616
/100m1
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504
/100mr
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
/100ml
7
Coillorm: Fecal Sirep 31673
/100ml
R
Residue: Total 500
mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
1
Residue.- Suspended 530 mg/I
t 12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
AlkaIinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
AIkallnily to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/l
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophylin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pit 7.6 82 ADM[
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mgA
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 m9A
Sulfide 745 mg/I
For Lab Use ONLY
`
Lab Number: LO
Date Received —3FC0
Rec'd b From: Bus-Couri - and
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
N113 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
N 2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70S07 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromlumTota11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 u9A
Ag Ilver 1077 ug/1
Al-Alurpinum 1105 ug/I
Be-Berytllum 1012 USA
Ca-Calclum 916 mile
Co -Co sit 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 u9A
Li-Lithlum 1132
Mg -Magnesium 927
Mn-Manganese 1055
Na-Sodium 929
Arsenic:Total 1002
Se -Selenium 1147
fig -Mercury 71900
Organochlarine Pesticides
Otgamphosphorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acld Extractable Organics T
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle re-,
I I Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mg/I
pit
Alkalinity
Acidity
Alr Temperature (a
Pit 8.3 PH 4.5
pH 4.5 PH 8.3
2
94
10
300 r
400 •
82244 431
82243 82242
20
Salinity R
Preclpitlon 0n/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction(Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/It
can Stream Depth It.
Stream Width IL
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
DM1/Revised 10186 —�

�j DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry tAboralory Report / Water Quality � � � �� �l�nn ///,L-b Number YW 1232
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE �� � �\ ✓ Q,citeceived: 3/3/2000
COUNTI'
ORANGE
PRIORITY
` s( f,� , -
- /Time Received: 2:50 AM
IUVER RAS1N :
AMBIENT
0 QA
STREAM
EFFLUENT
Received By ;
JG
REPORTTO
f
RRO Re:giona101fie
COMPLIANCE
0 CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
f
Other
KI EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Data Released ;
AR
COLLECTOR(S) :
JOHN HUNT
Date Reported:
3/10/2000
Estimated BOD Range:
Station Location: MICE CLAYTON FARM POND
Seed--
Chlorinated: N
Remarks:
Station 0
Dale Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Time End
Depth - bAl, DO, DBM
Value Type - A, H, L
Composite -TSB
SampleType
CLAYfON'S FARM
03/03/00
13:00
•
BOD 310 m /L
COD High 340 m L
COD Low 335 m L
X
Coliform MF Fccal 31616 13 000 /1O0m1
Co]iform; MF Total 31504 /loom]
Cog=: tube Fecal 31615 / IDOmI
ColifDrus: Focal Strep 31673 /loom]
Residue: Tota1500 L
volatile 505 L
Fixed 510 m L
Residue: S ded 530 m L
Volatile 535 L
Fixed 540 nwL
H 403 units
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 m L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 m /L
Alkalinity to VH 8.3 415 L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 - m L
TOC 690 mg1l.
JTurbidjtv 76 NTU
Calorm Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
0
Chloride 940 L
Chi a: Tri 32217 u L
Chi a: Con 32209 u L
Pheophyfin a 32213 u L
Color. True 8o C.U.
Color. 1l83 PH= C.U.
Color. pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m L
Fluoride 931 L
Formaldehyde 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 556 m L
Hardness Total90D m L
SpedLwCond95 umbaa/cm2
WAS 38260 m /L
Phenols 32730 u L
Sulfate 945 m L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Boron
Tannin 8: Li u L
HexavalenE C htomium u L
X
NH3 asN610
110
L
X
TKN an N 625
140
L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 63(1
<0.01
L
X
P: Total as P 665
11
m
L
PO4 as P 70507
L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m
L
K-Potassium
L
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u
L
04Chromium:Total1034
u
L
Cu- Copper 1042
u
L
Ni-Nicke11067
u L
Pb- Lead 1051
u
L
Zr, Zinc 1092
u
L
V-Vanadium
u
L
A - Silver 1077
u
L
A] -Aluminum 1105
u
L
Be Ilium 1012
u
L
Ca- Calcium 916
mg1L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u
L
Fe- Iran 1045
u
L
Li -Lithium 1132
u
L
Mg- Maum927
L
Mm-Manganem 1055
u
L
Na-Sodium929
m
L
ArseuimcTou11002
u
L
Se. Selenium 1147
u
L
H 71900
u
L
Ba_Barium
u
L
CkRanoddonne Pestiddes
Organophowhorm Pesticides
Acid Herbiacks
BascMeutralkAdd Extractable Organics
-
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeablee Organics (VOA bottle re 'd
TPH Gasoline Ra
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Rang
PhytopLankton

utvtatvty UI- LNVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER Q
Q -ORM (DM1)
JE
CdIJNTY_�Q�tl'�}�_�
PRIORITY
SA � � E i
f.7
RIVER BASIN E-t.L
[--]AMBIENT
❑
❑ STREAM
REPORT,'FO: ARO FRO MR WaRO WiRO WSRO TS
JkfEFFLUENT
AT Bit}
MPLIANCE
❑VEMERGENCY
CHAIN
❑ LAKE INFLUENT
Other
OF CUSTODY
LI
#
❑ ESTUARY
Shipped by; Bus Cnurl ta( Other
COLLECTORIS): S�t�� {-1Q141--
For 1_ab trs• nNi_V
Lab Number:
Dale Receive
-b Time ' 5z
Rec'd b :
From: Bus-Courie and
DATA ENTRY —BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:_
Estlmated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: M_ �, -LA.X f:o-1 FAQ-tw f-Cr4Ja
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No REMARKS: DF—I—o r„1 farsP
Station # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Tlme Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DHM Velue Type Composite Sample T pe
Ct_1%q S FPO a� 3 ���. !� '3� �3:3o a H L T s B c cross
HODS 310
rng/1
COD High 340
mg/1
2
3
COD Low 335
mg/I
4
olllorm: MF Fecal 31616
/100ml
S
Coiilorm: MF Total 31504
/100ml
6
Colilorm: Tube Fecal 31615
/100ml
.,
Colilorm: Fecal Strep 31673
/100m1
8
1 Residue: Total 500 mg/1
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/t
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 m9/1
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mgA
on
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Trd 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color.(PH ).83 ADMI
Color: PH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 656 m9A
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/l
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NN3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 rngA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/i
P: Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Cr-Chromlum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 u9/I
ZnZinc 1092 ug/i
Ag diver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/i
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 uSA
Li -Lithium 1132
Mg -Magnesium 927
Mn-Manganese 1055
Na-Sodlum 929
Arsenlc:Total 1002
Se-Selenlum 1147
Hg-Mercury 71900
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophc>%AvGrus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides
r I Rase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
I jAc1d Extractable Organics
I I Purgeabie Organics (VOA bottle re.
I I Ph ytopla nkton
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature r
D.O. mgA
PH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 9-3
2
94
to
300 •
400 tv
82244 1 431
82243 82242
20
Salinity %
Precipitlon On/day)
Cloud Cover 3
Wind Direction (Deg)
trearn Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth It.
Stream Width IL
480
45
132
136
11351
1350
135
64
F4
4
DMI/Revlsed 10/86

FORM IRR-2
Tract fi
Field Size (acres) _ (A)
Farrn Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone 11
lv
I
0
co
Lagoon Irrigaliorl Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle �
Crop Type
11) 121 !}I 14)
1
mmrdedtyt SFirl ii.na Total 0 5!
End Tlme Mlnulas P
l31- I�1
o
ri
Facilify hfurnber
D
444 a.
Irrigation Operator
lr l ig a li ai l Oper al or's
r
{
Address
�
operators Phone #
p
-I A C
le Ulilizaliotl Ptah
imerx}ed PAN Lojoing
O /
jUacrej a 1al
{71 fe} 191
19
Itl1
l VofLNne Wit la Analyse PAN *
PAN ApplIad
O elame'
'iral V040116
' !
per Aue (lbtIOW pal)-
{Il,rqjur)
(llr+ecae)
let - 110)
-
(gaiLnlnj 4
(gaud)
(yaltacrel
_ALLOL
1000
F
(61' (51 ' 14)
ALL
4-)r-199_P:60
Ajo a�+�QYiJIo 7 l
`•_ �Rt 0ao{ �' 3 1�n S : oo 0 1 11 I) 26405 9 -77'7 1 '�21. In S�
Crop Cycle Totals
1 r $14
Owner's Signalure Operalor's Stgr1a[Flre R�
Cerffied Operator (Print) Operalor's CerfiGcalion No-
NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalenl or NRCS Esliwate, Technical Guide Seclion 633. I.
Enlef!.lie value received by subtracting column (t0) from IB)_ Continue sublracF .:::olrutu>I (101 !tarn cohrum (11) following each fidgalion event, y

FORM IRR-2
f. q-
Tract If
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phorte U
. Lagoon Irricgalion Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FacililyNumber
(rrigaliori Operalor
Irrigallou Operalor's
Address - Tl
Operators Phone it p
From Waste Wilization Platt -
Crop Type necorruoended PAN 1-020ng
�`e &, (Itdauej - (a)
Ugn—
fIll 371 m of fSi (60 r71 rs1 rsl rtor' Flit
Date
r.wW&lVyr Slarl limn
End Tim@
i u-IR
Miru�les
131(71
fn iga Ilon
s or Sprinkled
Operatic Frow fiat@
Q a
19 urnlnj
.7orar l%ni)Voriona
(parJan�l
(8) - (5) - f4)
Volurne
per hue
iypvarlaJ
1?L
(A)
waste Analysis PAN '
(IGirt)00 gal)
PAN AppKed
1.1waorej
9
—t$1-�-�.
1060
NihOpeu Fratance'
(IWauel
&
/1
13 .919I �!}� f
0700
4Q
' f1Qvj9vu
q. ' -'
.foo
7�
l -
&/
Z07 9143
42913
-
9q 'A
6.
?a Illy bo
Crop Cycle Tolafs i_ I
Owner's Signature
Cerlified Operalor (Ptinl)
Opeiator's Signaliue
Operator's Cerlirication 140-
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalenl or ORCS Eysarnate. ,recl,nicar Gulde Section 633-
' En(er.rJ}e value received by sublracling column (10) from (8]. Continue SLIbIfac! , _ ::ofunils (10) born colu+nn (11) following each Irrigation evenl.
J

A
FoRm iRR-2
Tract 11
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone to
Lagoon Irrigalion Fields Record
F, 2 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facilily Ntmlber
I
U1
19
tV
D
bricalion Operator
Irrigation Operaiar's-
Address
Operalol's Phone O
From Waste Utilization flan
Crop Type Recommended PAN loading i� /
e s (lWacre) - la] / i
rn nl 1a1 411 1`51 161 01 161 1% tldl fill
Oa[e
mmrddhr
SlarlTirne
End Time
Total
MInules
(3] • 42]
Urigalrorl
! ar Sprinklers
operaWrp
Fivw Rai*
I4aVminl
. Ta1alVollrme
(gaelall)
16) - IS] - 011
V6hune
per Acre
(VAvacro)
11IL
IA
Waste Andlyri! PAN r
1ILrI0001jal]
PAN App[re4 _ Mlrapen a31j ce �
tlWiva] hL7screj
E Q 8 ID
-L4
1000
qQ
of . oo
'too
D
3
a , Al
�,21, -in 6
! a
1) 04D
1 D_ _
I
I g�y U
a
/mil, a
Crap Cycle Totals l I
Owner's SignalLIM
Certified Operator (Prim)
Opera lor's Slgnalure
Operalor's Ce1 ti'flcaliorl No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estirrlale, Technical Guide Section 633.
Ealer.1he value received by subtracting coltrrnri (10) from 18), Conlintte sublrac" :olturnrl (10) from column (11) following eacli litigation event.

r�
O
Traci rI
Field Size -(acres) = (A)
Farm Oviner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone R
Lagoon lrricdalion Fields Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility NuDiber
Irligalion Operatot
Irrigalion Operator's
Address
Ope(alor's Phone 4)
r
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Rewrrwnended fW1 Loarli(wj
c jddac.e) = IH)
r R "I i'it rat r51 i61 i71 [et (91 r101 111i
Dale
mnOdNYr
Issigation
Wa sle Anarysis PA"'
QW1000 qal]
pAT1 Rpyilied
(EWacre)
�-(9L
1000
HiUogei= balance '
{LWacre)
4130 - 1103
Slarl Time
End Time
total
Minutes
(31 - (2)
Ar al Sprinklers
Operalin2
FI" RaLe
(gaumin)
Toiaf Vohnne
{garcons)
(a) - (5) - (1)
VOhkne
per Acre
{gabacre)
1?
EA)
I AN
? 17.E
:va
l3 -179
; 66
;aa
.2 qt)
I
l!
• -o
s:o0.
Aq0
!
1)1)
fin
1, e
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signalure Operator's Signalitre
Certiried Operator (Pjini) Operator's Cel lificalion No_
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Ctluivalenl or MRCS Eslinlale, 7ectinical Gidde Seclion 633_
7 Faler the value received by subtracling column (10) fioln {13). Continue sub[rac1" COIJIMIL (10) I(OM calunul (11) io#lowing each irrigaliun evens.

f
FORM lRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Own ei•5 Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Farm far Each Field per Crop Cycle
f -!
Facility Number
Irrigation Operaloi
Iiii9alion Operalol•s
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Ulilizalim Plan
Ctop Type Recanmended PAN Loaning
(miacre)
01 121 (31 (41 . (5) (61 _ f71 1181 (91 fiel H 11
Rate
mnUtltlrYr
- Irrigation -
W+ste Analysis PAN '
(itylPUt7 gal)
PAr4 Applied
pivacre)
�i'_�
IOUD
Nitrogen ealance 7
pWaue}
(a7 Itu1
Stare Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
{31 ' (2)
s or Sprinklers
Operatmg
Flow Halle
le
IgaUrry
7o1a1 m Vohia
(yarfons)
(8) " (5] (6)
1101ume
per Aae
ryalfacre}
—�
IA)
Crop Cycle Totals I Y I
Owner's Signature
Cerliried Operator (Prim)
Operaloi's Sigoaltire
Operator's Cellificaiion No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estiniate.Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the Ynhie received by subtracting coltemil (10) tioin (B). Continue sLriJtraCl; calulrliti (10) born cal1.0ut11 (1 1) iottowing each irrigation event
a�
U
i
LO
L.0
(n
LO
0
W
D
O
K
v
Ul

A
FORM IRR-2
Tract #J
Field Sire (acres) = (A)
Far1n Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone it
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
¢-t
Facility Plumber
liiigalion Operator
Irrigation Operalor's
Address
Operalor's Phone 9
From Waste Ulilizalion Pfan
Crnp Type r��� Retomrrierwlet<PAN Lowing
l-tiC ti4 (wtacre} = I61
ril f77 131 441 rSl [61 ill {61 [91 M)l fill
Oale
mrNddryr
1ligalion
Wasle Analysis VAN
(INIGoo qal)
PAN Applied
pUhcre)
iLAL
1 Gp0
Nil"en8al,3'Ke'
(Ibracre)
51ar1 iirne
End time
Total
Minules
df Sprinklers
Operaling
Flow "ale
Tnla1 VolurnB
Igallvnil
ts) - (51 . (4)
Valiune
per Acre
(gauaue)
_QL
{A}
to
c26 Lfoo
`77
y3
(e �• Q'1
-jr . qq
tob
61wot
y
0
— % 1
A40-0
n& y
9777
9 77 2
3
Crop Cycle Totals I i
Owner's Signalure
Cerlified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signahrre
Operaloi's Ceilificalion No -
-O
NCCA Waste Anaylysis or F-quivateni of MRCS Esliniale, Technical Guide Section 633-
M
Enter the value received by subtracling column (Ifl) from (6). Con(inile sublrar'--colllrnn (10) horn c0)umn (l l) loll-Dwing each irrigaliorf event- '

7
FORM iRR-2
Lagoon Irrigalion Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract N > ietd J! Facilily Number
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner Irrigation Operator
Owner's Address Irrigation Operator's
W— Andress
Owner's phone 4 Operator's Phone Al
Urcm Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Reconrnended PA!! loading /Y/Y77�1
fil r21 fl1 f41 (61 r61 01 lei (9l 4101 r111
Dale
mnVaLltyr
W igaf ion
Waste Analysis PAl! '
(1671000 gal)
PAN Applied
(tL+ac.eJ
MUD
Nflrppe+r L}alance `
(W+acre}
Start Tune
f nd Time
Polar
tr!'mules
(3} - (2)
O or S ri.Arers
p
Operalir Kj
Flow hale
.(gaurnir$
total Vdnuke
(9zllons)
40) (S) . (4)ALL-
Winne
per Acre
(yaNacre;
(A)
S: as
U
U
• r,l�
i�
-
"
;aa
+ Aa
_/1
D
Qq
Crop Cycle Totals t I
Owner's Signalure
Cerlifred 0peralor (Print)
Operators Signalure
Operalor's Cedificarlon Nu.
1 NCDA Wasle Aaaylysis or F(Ilfivalenl or NRCS Eslimate, Technical Guide Seclion 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting coluam (10) from(8}- Contimie suhtracti c010+I111 (10) irom colunm (11J ta]lowinc} eaclf irritation everli
0
7

IN
FORM 1RR-2
Dact 11
Field Size (ac{es) = RA)
Farin Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone 11
Lagalan lrrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
F acilily NLtrrlber
Irrigation Opelalor
I rrigal"iorl Operalor's
Address
operators !done a
Frorn Waste Uti)izalion Plan
Crop Type Reconruended PAH loading
[I[llaue)
r11 r21 ill 141 (5) {sJ Ili (e) 191 rlW IIII
Dale
mi�aludryr
loigation
WASIL Analysis PAt1 '
[IGrIflODgal)
PA" Applied
(ttWzCreJ
lOflo
Kilroge" Balance t
(Jwacre)
S[an Time
End Time
total
Minuses
it of Sprinklers
aperalni9
Flow Rale
Igaurninj
7dal Volume
(gallons)
vodune
pelAcre
(gaVacie)
(A)
-1
,' Q
y�
o71o1Jf
3
��
tJc:
`d 4
477
3
v?
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Sigaalure
Certified Operalor (Print)
Operators Signalwe
Operators Cerlificaiiol! No.
v
l NCDA Wasle Anaylysis or Erluivaleill of MRCS Eslinuie, Technical Guide Section 633. m
' Eisler the vallle received by subtracting calwnn (10) iroiln (B) Colllinere stiblracl�'- Y
olluntti (1 G) tram Colllran (1 1) iollawing each itrigalion evenl

IV
Traci ff
Field Site (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Pllone V
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
F-j
F ac lily Number
IlrigalionOperator
irrigation Operalor's -
Address
A
Operator's Phone -9 O
Froin Waste Utilixdliore Platt
heap type Aecomrnen(lrd F'AH loadia7 - - -
r11 171 111 r1] M K) 171 id] 14l 4IM rill
Dale
51ae1 line
mnv4ddlyr
End Time
ioiai
Mlneele s
(7) - {71
lae igallon
I or Sprinklers
Total Valuene
opelatiup Five Fiale (gatroils)
{garhnln} (6) • is; = (41
Vaf.wne
per Acrs
(gaVaue)
-U-L
IA
Ms Ie Analysis PAR a
QW1000ga1J
" '
PAN Appitad
{IEeraueJ =
14L• Cat_
I QOO
r4weven ilmance
iilrlaua}
Igl - I Wj.
.2-11-41
i
y
r
Ll .-V. CA :vim
L :00
1A40
a 1, AfOD
7 7 7
¢3400
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Sigralure Operalors Slgnalure
Cerlified Operalar (Print) Operator's Cerlirrcalion No, - ^�
NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Erluivalenl or NRCS Eslimale, Technical Guide Section 633- ,
6riler.Uie value received by stiblracling solemn (10) froin {6)- Continue subtrac'- :olumn (10) from cohaim (11) following each Irrigallon eveui.

X,
FORM IRR-2
. m
cQ
I
Ul
Q
Tract 11 Field N I•acilily NUrnber
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner Irrigation 0peralar _
Owners Address ririgation Operator's ^ ,
Address
Owner's Phone ft Qpeialor's Phone #
lei�rril
Lagoon Irrigalion Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycre
f•1
iFrarn Waste Ulllizatioa Plait
Croy Type Recommended PAN loadlneq
ilk 140 (51 161 - ilk till 191 elot - it 11
Ogle
mrrddalye
Starr lime
End Time
Folar
minutes
hrga(Inn
r or Sp+inklers
operalirra Flaw Rile
(4sVrnln)
Total Vollrnle
(9,001rs}
Volume
per Acre
(yallacrej
EA
Wails Analysis PAN'
IIWIoaQga4
PAN Applied
(1lYecre)
�LtIL
1—
Nilro9ep f>atonce a
IRsraus}
181 . 11uJ
-
'.a
1 M 2 671
A �
o
a & Ato
o
17
1/ ,
r
1
'Vov
7
�z
/9- U
Crop Cycle Tolals I i
Owner's Signalure
Cerlifred Operator (Prinl)
Oileralar's Signal(Ire
Operator's Cell lifcalion No.
( NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Ect(livalerll or NRCS Estinlale, Technical Guide Section 633.
Eillel, a value received by sublracling column (10) trout [B). Continue subtrac'- :olunin (1d) Irotrl column (11) lollowing each irrigaliarl evert!-
j L.
-1l
ID
O
K

A
Fonm IRR-2
Tract It
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Faun Owner
Owner's Address
owner's Phone It
Lagoon Irrigation Fietds Record
One Form for Eacti Fietd per Crap Cycle
Facirily Number -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigaliorl Operator's ^
Address
A
Opeialor's Phone 9 n
r �
From Waste Wilization Plan
Ciop Tyne Fiecamruended PAN Loa4Nny
ll[vauej = (a)
M r7l r11 r11 r51 r61 01 rat r91 llal 1111
Date
M-04tyI Slail Time
EadTime
10111
Mirwde3
(3) (T)
n iga l iort
9or SprWEren
Operaling Fivw Flare
(gaVrnlrn)
-floral Vuhnna
(gallons)
(60 ` (S) - (4)
Volume Wafre MarYsi� PAN •
"OAC60 (ILVIOW galj
(gavaue)
!Ti
(A)
PANApId d
IIWaaa)
14ri0
NIE(agen Sslarice r
pr�raere)
a.11}g_ w
a YO—i
J4400
7
et
Iota
ido,
17
,
-9-- 9,C1
Q OC)
:Ig
I A - -
rM
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signalure
Cerliried operalor (Print)
OPerator's SignalWC
Operalol's Celdirrcalion No.
1 NCDA Wasle Anaylysis or E(it rival eni or NRCS EsGmale. Technic at Guide Seclion 633_
r Fuler.ute value received by sublracling column (10) Godn (13)_ Continue Whtrac'' olurorl (10) Irorn culunln (1 1) Tollowing each Irriaalion even(.

A
FORM IRR-2
Tract 11
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Faiin Owner
Owner's Acid ress
Ownei s Phone f
lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number -
fork 2(ion Operator
Irrigation Operaloi s
Address ii
Operator's Phone V o
From Waste Wilizalion Plan
Crop Type RecommendedPA ue7dfo
es (� ^
111 01 ill let (51 M) 111 48! ar, 191 Ilal (r rl
Oele
mmfdCrrr
Staro Time
EndTlme
rolat
Mlnerles
{]) • {7J
litigation
f or Sprinklers
Operating flow Raja JotalVolurne
(gaVrnln) (galfaa)
r6j • {SIR {��
Vornne
per Acre
(gauaus)
i2f "
(A)
WaalaAnaly�i�PAH`
(IW19l0gal)
PANApplfed
Wove)
��
1 —1
NilrooeetBalance�
(rtvacre)
!4i llol
4 �a5 - ?3
: ao
ll� . boo
Crop Cycle Tolals 1
Owner's Signalure Operator's Signalrrre
Certified Operator (Prins) Operaloi s Ceriiricalion No.
1 NCOA Wasle Anay)ysis or Equivalent or NRCS Eslimale, Technical Guide Seclion 633. ,
1 Esiler_.Hre value received by stiblraeling coltrinri (10) (rain (B)_ Conlinue sublrac" -. _oltrrnn (10) from colurrm (1 t) lodlawislp each Irrigation evellt.

X.
Fonm IRR-2
Traci /1
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
owner's Phone 0
Lagoon Irrirgaiion Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
�- I
Facilily Number
N
co
I
cQ
M
D
Irrigalion Qperalor
AMPMr—
lirigalion Operator's
Address �l
Z7
Operator's Pllorle #
Frain Waste Utilization Flab
Crop T7pe Ramrrruended PAN toaJing j rII n, ill rfl rs1 1`61 tt1 ral - r91--,= rook IM
Date
rnmr�dlYr
Start Time
Total
End rW M Mimi I
13) I21
Irrig alion
orSprkrkle+s
Operalinq
Flow [tale
(galhrdnl
Volume Waste Analysis PAN'
7a1aJ; Vdisrike per A[ta (ItJ701)o gall
IgallanR) tyauacsej
(e} 15} . 44} YI
PAN Applied
(12060reJ
�112L
1000
NilrggLn GMN'Ka a
{1Wauel
Ip} - (IU)
110
' bt)
Q
_
,
Crop Cycle Totals
owners Signature Operal&S 5ignaiure
Cerlilied opera(or (Prirtl) Operalats Celtificalion No.
1 NCUA Waste Anay(ysis or Equivalent or NRCS Eslimale, -fechnical Guide Section 633,
r Eidi!rA,fie Value received by subtracting column (10) [loon (B), Confiinue stiblrac" : _ ::alunin (10) (loin column (111] following each 111`19e1ipn even(.

MEMO
DATE: --?,I1I A.
TO: SUBJECT: ��� c4e:.4' �
Li
(AP DOD
G A-4 lQ
N�.�1 •��a. � q bD
C4,11,
`-A 2-v
5 c7 c7.7
T,3
09.,
!_ 1
�/1rpo
, s"v 1
FROM:
I �p
i NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
PRIN7RD ON BICYCLED PAPER

Factors to be considered for current assessment of violations occurring at Gates Poultry; Mike
Clayton.
2/7/00; Discharge observed from lagoon, estimated flow 1 gpm, sampled at entrance to stream.
(Considerably diluted by snow melt in progress)
Also observed and sampled discharge from poultry litter stored above stream.
2/14/00; Discharge from lagoon, estimated flow at 2 gpm, sampled at spillway exit.
2/23/00; Discharge still occurring at lagoon, estimated flow barely detectable (<1 gpm).
No sample collected, not determined to be leaving the site. Owner produced broken irrigation
equipment part as evidence to support why only minimal land application had been conducted.
3/3/00; Discharge from above ground aluminum pipe into small farm pond. Samples taken from
stream entering pond and flow exiting pond. Using ammonia analysis (referenced analysis from
samples collected 2/14/00) determined conservative estimate of 35,600 gallons spilled.

h
Foam IRR-7
j"-1
Lagoon Irricgation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
drat{ r$ Field u Faciiily Nwilber Field Size (acres) = JA)
Farm Owner Irrigalion Operator
Owner's Address Irrigalion Operalor's
Address
Owner's Phone It Operator's Phone fi
,
From
Wasle Utilization Play(
Crop
Type
Recorruuended PAN Loading
{—
%.S C it G
- - -
(irolauel = [Ell
(1)
(2)
Irriga9on
volume
Waste Anary34 PAN.
PAN ApMled
Nllropeu 981ince'
Dale
mrnftldfYr
SLrE lime
Talal
f or SprWiera
operalnp row date
-7oh1 Volume per Aria
IRJ IQf}Q fat?
(Ilvacre}
�Lgj`
11wacre)
lei - IIUI
End 71me
Minutes
{gaUrnln)
(gall ns) lyauaual
1(!06
(1) • (2}
(6) , (S) 1 (4) V1
JAI
400
ay
t
dyad
: �a
00
1?aga4il
+�GO T?
119A
s
?
-C
Air
L) : jin
i Pli
1 31.E
l � R/, i7 2
i l_ , l c
�' /)
Crop Cycle Tolals
owner's Signature
CC plied Operator (Prinl3
Operator's Signalwe
Operator's Cellirrcalion No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or [quivalenl or MRCS Eslinlate. Technical Guide Seclion 633.
r Enler.l3ie "lue received by subtracting column (10) Iran l;01. Continue Stibilac" -olurnn (10) from colilrorr (11) lolrowing each irrJgalion ever i.
I
N
CD

LIN

Cross Section D-D'
95 0-----
~.^. --
ross Section I I'
l+55
------------
C+l5
Cross Section D-D'-----
330/ |
265'
' |
/ .
265/
!
Paul Gates Waste Treatment Lagoon
Class IV | -------'
July, 1981
Designed by Warren Faircloth
District Technician ! �
. | --------'
Checked by Angela D. Greene -
Civil

Class IV �
July, 1981
Designed by Warren Faircloth
District Technician � |
Checked hv Angela D. G���me | �
-~ | �
Civil Engineer
'
| | �
Design Approved Approved by Ronald L. Marlow
Civil Engineer
----
^
! /---
|
| '
' !
~ Scale: Verticl9 l"=8 �----
' | /
Horizontal l"=401 8
Fill Volume for Dam = 8895 yds. --|
Volume of Lagoon to 94'0 = 3I585 yds.----
Elevations:
/ .
Top of Dam 95.0
Bottom of uf Lagoon; 84^0
MDxim0n Volume d3'l6 -
Emergency Spillway 94'0 � ----
. TBM: Nail in Northwest Corner of �
chicken house' Elev. lOO'O ' '----
Cross Section I -I'
! .-----
�
I+45—�---
Sheet iOfro
A

$-1

-�:1, __
c - .�,
�`� ,_
r ,
.Jr ' ' y - li
< - y`c. .Y
�' � .
l � +_'`i,
�a

('`-1 C"Ak-6 &,b5'

lrr-� may• ` t

lflU � ��7 ��C7 -�U�� v

,T

dr

�� t �� .�i �st�

,�7'}-
l
4,

a

(off— ( f�� �3�.�cns Edna,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MIKE CLAYTON
6507 HOLLY RIDGE ROAD
ROUGEmoNT NC 27572
Dear Mike Clayton:
NCD' R
NORTH CAROLINAtDEFA���� T OF
ENVIRONMENT AN6,NATURALY�E OURCES
J���August l5, qi f
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for -Nonpayment
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Permit Number: AWP680001
Orange County
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 5/21/1999.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 5/21/2001 - 5/20/2002 is $150.00. Your payment was due 7111/2001,
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
Sincerely,
IG
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Raleigh Regional Office
Orange County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper

Yours For USU A
C 0 N 8 E R V A T I 0 N
Orange Soil & Water Natural Resources PO Box 8181
Conservation District Conservation Service 306 Revere Road
Phone: [phone], Ext. 2750 Phone: [phone], Ext. 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278
11/27/2000
TO: John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Gail Hughes Brent Bogue
Soil Conservationist District Conservationist
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District USDA-NRCS
RE: Lagoon Closure Plan for Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
The Orange Soil and Water Conservation District (District) and the USDA -Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) staff began working with Mike and Sue Clayton, owners and
operators of Gates Brothers Poultry Farm, on a lagoon closure plan in early June.
In June, the Clayton's requested and received approval from the local technical staff to extend
the waste application pumping schedule until the second week in July. There had been
several days of rain, and the extension allowed the Clayton's to reduce the liquid levels in the
lagoon.
The local NRCS and District staff, along with the NRCS and Division of Soil and Water
technical engineering staff evaluated the lagoon and have made the following
recommendations for closure. The staff members will continue to monitor progress until
closure of the lagoon is completed.
Estimated amount of liquid volume (based on original designs) for irrigation is 4,453,575
gallons.
Estimated volume of solid waste to be excavated and broadcast is 1,484,524 gallons.
(25% of total volume) This estimate may be adjusted once liquid volume is decreased and
the solids are visible.
Clayton's will follow their existing waste utilization plan -for irrigation. (50.3 wettable acres
available)
As solids become visible, Clayton's will begin to agitate the solids, incorporating solids
with liquids and continue to irrigate waste.
Waste samples will be taken as solids are incorporated into the liquid. The waste
utilization plan will be up -dated, as needed by the technical staff.
Solids that can not be irrigated will be sampled and a waste utilization plan will be written
for this material that will be broadcast.

Solids will be excavates from lagoon and broadcast onto gra�slarid on the farril. (58 acres
are available).
The Clayton's have decided to flatten the entire embankment (rather than breaching one
section), seed the area in grass, therefore, being able to r1iow and maintain the area as
pasture.
After completion of closure, staff will certify closure of the lagoon and notify the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) staff.
The Claytons have begun the closure process by irrigation of the liquid waste. Staff members
will continue to monitor liquid levels throughout the winter months. Progress of the closure
will be determined by weather conditions.
Staff members will continue to up -date DWQ staff with progress of the closure. If you have
any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Brent Bogue or Gail Hughes
at 919-245-2750.

Certificate of Coverage AWP680001
-Gates Brothers Poultry Farm:
Page 2
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
r The subject -farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 502.
4
Sincerely,
err T. Steven
JON
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) j
Orange County Health Department R�iCE►y �Gl"�-r—�-�--1
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section L OFFICE
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 21, 1999
Mike Clayton
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Rd
Rougemont NC 27572
•W,A
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWP680001
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Poultry Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Orange County
Dear Mike Clayton:
In accordance with your application received on April 1, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Mike Clayton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with State General Permit
AWG300000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Gates Brothers Poultry Farm, located in Orange County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than 60000 Layer and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and
injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Yi
at otilte 01 140111111 Ual'01111a
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 4AT''IOnlf�'I��VF
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 7-'8
(THIS FORM UAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) 4PP FCJ�ON
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste GporatiorQsl;g99
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriatep, If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Mike Clayton
1.3 Mailing address: 6507 Holly Ridge Rd
City, State: Rougemont NC _ Zip: 27572
Telephone Number (include area code): 732-6035
1A, County where facility is located: Oran e
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Northm_ Orange Co. on SR. 15249 (Holly Ridge Rd.)
1 1/2 mile from intersectionof SR 1524 and Flwy. 57 N. on left.
1.6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): __ NIA_
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/50
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): _ /V/A
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 68 (county number); 1 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descnp ion: �Poultry operation
Layer
60000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Eyes; F7 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum numberTor which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
Pagel of
68 - 1
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:
I

f
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 50.0 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): -43-6r 35-'4- (we lde &cres)
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 1
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
NIA YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by -which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.I4 Mortality'Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
ry
Page 2 of 4 68 -1
Applicants initials

t.
WAT P 0UAVfVSEC7,10N
QRR 1 1999
Facility Number: 68 - 2
Facility Name: Latta's Egg Ranch Wn-Discharge Perrnf tffrlg
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, T Nike n lq, j -on _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for i$A7ES 'P611i iy1A FARM (Facility name listed in question I A)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned tome as incomplete.
Signature
Date '
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if difrcrent from the Land Oxvncr)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for _ __ __ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of ny knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
_ — Date,.__ .-
T1IE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGIs, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 68 - 2

I
Mill
LAK
MICHAF1
7* Film
Receiving
Waters
Streams of Orange County
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
NELISE RIVER BASIN
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN
ORANGE COUNTY
NOQJ11 CARCtjIA

A S* yyyy
-fat�f71 .• aJ/ .r r!"�./{•+a i rriS ^� t �, r; i
Ut
it %i,w.•NI, ''� r,riJSC In.• }r' i� .t<u.Rh'I�J' r.
f� of� •4 - .. '
Ali
Y 'ar7 g d ; 5 4sb ± ..+ cut f" ":t F+n F • (M1
Mr
,.r
..A ��'�*'�• '� �'r'�•� 'r•.t. • 11',i.t, vby.. ��,F ..,aim-Pv �i !' .,:i.+a•��... I ► lw 5 I •p a �� ryr� �i
-h'yr�% j� � � Y• �� �.��j� :rA� { 4;'�2 - •��" t4fS1� \.. � M`1 j ' J- �i. ' 1=11F 1
i { F-• •f;�.+ �t i ',y.'� }'sI; t•� 'F r r ' 'i . I f r • t� ,
i`� �:`.T ��j-� a �:2� . � f:'„+.���a •,`1 .�•'' . �' � + . 00
10
.�.jr'>� Jl� 7 '� ,w�?� �,ipjj-i4'71,•'q'Z -n . n�_5• �• J 7� �T i� � � 1 i � � .,Y..
it
s• r �+� �$' XJ`41 °" �fit'�S r � �i'_;,,,, '' , It•f � ... ... ' a V' ��.�,,1ry ,•�
�' � rF�+ir� �`? z�i�.�'�'"',�`� �t�� a. l �✓;;;y! � ^ . 'i• r ���' �r_•` �j � � �^� �e[C� C L:
•'f_� r.�`4:�:�jL t�.�• �l��� ';1,��. �V \:i� ` •� �.. "•�.. � '" " ^r •�' t • � . �'Rl �`rll
, 1f7i r�
v ..gip. Y i.. �J • ''�ii "';; *t � *r ;•. .C'. Q' "'Sir ;+�. � � '*� ,� ., %�
"7 "►. �!y��tR�-tit '�v �, ;g.' i,� if !�� b s� ,. =�+I.j �I,P��„y,��•�Sfi��
_ '"` � � � Rf.q, ..�••�..�_... ,_ C....,,r. xi7�I �• ��' Nt!';` a 3 � a.. �,A•. 1 t''
V�iA � YS* x �'a 7 •r � = rt +<�i� �����'�.r � ��xF P `j�J '. 1 i.��rwl ' '���3{�4t}'� r`
.3,� " 1 y� ;: i' a�yy!$�+iv�!}r r i� J�• �1r 'ri•!L , ;f
•�'� of r
�:y+1 �1 �"7,: a+ y =y,�y�1g Z`Z�' ' .•'•t'} 'y '3
3 .i •r'• r :/.� +, 4 •fi• Zr 'J y +: lVi:f.♦'a •�+i ti "L i{/,y��
�(�'�,p- :\is, ? rr ry'm:-• S '{�'i Yi � � i 7,;� yi`^'ar�� %� � rgy�yr ,x 's1�L[f j(;�+�%r���SiY'�+� sE �
.35
-1y' U i.:�:'� � � S, �. �• Q • � - J f �i)¢''✓ �,�y".�.� ,i'�Y: `t �i S;�T'Y }t �4,7L �,i '�nJ
� �� q?lE�a�a; F�.l.r ' r iwtq .4•.. F'. I � �r�► 14t I-;''�'�. �� ;i �t,�� �. �e.�� L i221rr Il�` s'ye�ra`��J
Y ;'fii !<y `�`�.a 1� �.a.i ��, � �, �1 +� '�� .�� a��"Li, •?� .� � �5S�, �. y t
y �, ¢, �,1 M t�4 r•1 .r d�:�" �e.i L, �"'*+�,'r rb aj,,:1f' i. MF �.a � ,` s �g,y .t��-J +ia�X +
J r 'irr. � � f �a =�o '•�'' ��y,., - � i k. • �. �i . •I.T 3e ,E i� i•i 'p�,�/Jy�r.�� :,'1�1 =f i ;
;'"�'fit �����`.�;t ; i1i � L �� �`d ��, i,�l., `�'e; •', �,a��;'�iy'�i �l:y":�'�,,v�,��;i� J ;' s�. �'I�Tj�; ��;1r��%,t,i��t� ,1 ! � nu Fy=
13;k"h }�� ,7 t:► x s� s�i 7 �� sue; d F t (�s� ♦c Yrt, uT lf'!1r,�,
� t 1 �'� � � �� * - � .! Ip , : � x r'f F�`' � * r•:,4 ^iF j , -� � r •�'�` �. y����.$'+�* �'.r {�'l�a �� �V
Y� `,FY,;! x••�!`F ei„�Y�/'rj`<„ �.'s w 'r,' w� i ` C4 ��;" •'7� �+Fs 3,p ;
w �4 �3TrY�Tt1 ` a� •YS'J `�nEli wr,3r.r lyl . �tt��, }ems V/r �.'„ .j: (• -fir . r.J L '�1�-T y,`Y.•�S
-��tj�i '� Tf{ - ',f I".rrt� `i, f• �A r' ��J �t � '�� �'• � s%{
lb
x
u71: 19It
e Y�5-_ � .k+r� a�µr•rj.� � �1` 1 S.�C � ��a="e��# lyy i � { ..i.'* 'If►�� t. ��
ai i,r .•4 .�►i1 i �n'.a E g F
,may' ,. 1a r� t a��"'� , "!� ,.: ±.r �;� 1 �: 7, •.. •� lw.�r,
�pr _ �,h t, Y ���} � �• Its. '.�z�. G. •i{�eL � a�*�4Y
1 r��� l , � _ �rr - 111�jgr �� ?� +3.. "g`a'V^ t `°: =ems • �i
.®,• r�• ti�..i '��•rqt V
�, „I;y� {F a. .�r � .:.� dr•i�, r a
isJ.ro �� .a i� ,r +.i'' R3i. 4.► � 1
.4 �,�{y,' ii S� .: f; •!� 31 i , - i 1 Y ' ,,�'. _ • S .1i,
°T���rr•.T��1 ♦' �S �i�iis�f•���+ � �• • Y � ,,i ..St.�twrr� 9 l f, '. � d1. y p. i ..
f.►.'ifflf.rs.•,.'•T3(7'�r`'T,',:`y�J rci}•c�.ag•rw"�r'Lf1 `3 .i:' '� ,
iy �r•,��v�-,k+ Firj�#Qy�
C '�O'fif4_ ry r�wwi ti�r�'.;�?`""'•,r� M.I M. ��y ��S i� Ih., •� r`Qti! r"`S i
xpostxre-

.0
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
Mike and Sue Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Rd
Rougemont NC 27572
Existing LAYERS
60000.00 BIRDS
Anerobic Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established. .
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution; the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
60000 BIRDS x 10.95 gals waste/BIRDS/year = 657000 gals
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
60000 BIRDS x .084 lbs PAN/BIRDS/year = 5040 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the
crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 2

A
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
IFIELDI
SOIL TYPE & CLASS- ICROP
JYIELDJ
LBS
ICOMM N
**
* LBS
I
I
DETERMINING PHASE ICODE
I AW N
I PER
IACRESI
AW N
I
IPER ACI
AC
I
I USED
-----I
I
I or
I
----
I
IAPPLYI
IRESID.I
I^APPLIC
I
I
IMETH
I
I N
I
I TIME
9951
11,4
IHrB
JfG
14.8
I180
I
19
I1620
1
I
II
I
I
I
I
IFB-MY,SP
-NV
9951 12,3 jOr IFG 13.1 116.251 7.6 1883.5
I I II I I I IFB-MY,SP-NV
9951 15,6 JL9 JFG 13.6 1135 1 118.8 12538
I I II I 1 F I IFB-MY,SP-NV
I TEND I I I !
I I II I 1 I I I
TOTA1I5041.5
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management
plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

40
a
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT IFIELDI
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
JYIELD1
LBS
ICOMM N
**
* LBS
I
I
DETERMINING PHASE (CODE
I
I AW N
I PER
(ACRES
AW N
(PER ACI
AC
I
I USED
-__--
I
I or
I
I -------
I
I
(APPLY
I
IRESID.I
I APPLIC
IMETH
I
I
I N
I
I TIME
I
I END
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter
annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less
any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE I CROP I UNITS IPER UNIT
FG FESCUE - GRAZED
1
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
I
TABLE 1 f 35.4 5041.5
TABLE 2 I 0 o
TONS 1 37.5
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 1 35.4 1 5041.5
*** BALANCE I -1.5 '
-------------------
_ *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 5
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

'I
V
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize
the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable
acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas
unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application
rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the
tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 840 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge_
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 4200
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 14 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 33.5 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25� depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
I£ surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6
ANIMAL WASTE LTFILIZATION PLAN

amounts of nitrogen shown in the ,tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is.provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
ITract
i'
I
I Field
I I
I
I Soil Type
I Crop(in/hr)
I
I Application RatelApplic.
I
Amount
(inches)
I
19951
�h
11,4 1
I 1
HrB
I FG
I
I .2
I
I *.75
I
I9951
1 2,3
1-1
1 Or
i FG
... ^
i .2
*.75 -
9951
1 5,6
1 Lg
I FG
.2
*.75
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 274.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
9.13333333333 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be
stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of -the producer and waste applicator to ensure
that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates
to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 7
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
.reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page% 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS

10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of, the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste.shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS

ti
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should -be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels, pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.'
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

I
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:Gates Brothers Poultry
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Mike and Sue Clayton
(Please print) 1 Q
Signature:/k, Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: '� �� Date; 1 f
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please_print)E. Brent Bogue
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. [phone]
Address (Agency): PO Box 8181 306 Revere Rd
Hillsborough NC 27278
Signature: Date:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 11
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

,t
t�
r
Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a'technical Specialist desbintcd by die North C:irc,tina Soil :tnri W tte,- Conser%•.l[3U[l ComnlliSio(l pursls:tnt lu l�:\
,NCAC 6F .0005. I certiry that the animal waste management system for die farm nanied above has an animal %vis,
rrtanaQeme:u plan Utat rtu:ets or exc;:cds standards and specifications of Uie Division of Eavirunniental Managcnic.
(DEI,I) as Specified in 15A `±C:\C-)H.0217 anti lire USDA -Natural Resources Conszrv,jtion Ser•�icu (tL,4RCS) aneL't?r the
i✓ordi Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC ?H.0?17 anti IfA NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The foiiowinQ elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each cat(!20T-• desi�lnatcs a technical specialist
who may Sign each certification (SD..SI. WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only cerufv parts for which d1C%' are
technically competent.
II. CertYicatiora of Desi( n
A) Collection. Stora«e. Treatment Svstein
Check Oft! appropriate box
ZExisting facility without retroflL (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for opemtion cahacuv: stl)ri2e capabili(I" c0d[,istent .%ith wa"(c Utilization
requiretlieuts.
_1 Nrew. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Anirltal waste 51.0raae and treaunent structures. such as but not lirniWd to collection scsrem,. 1,12001u and ponds.
have been desiUned to nleet or exceed the ininimum s[:indards and specirtcatiuns.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): (7)'�?.tZ�
A.f#'ilianon USDA — 2CS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency). P•0•Za1C 3 IjaJ �VQv llc. Q(, SS Phone No.:33G-7� 3
Signature; 7
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of laird for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management. hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): &rA Z�
Affiliation __. Date Work Completed: /2
Address (
SiLmature
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriare box
9JFacility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not conmin anv exwrior furs.
Plione No,A!j)6yU-/off
Datc:��97
J Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging_ and heavv use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): &641 ,Oaaa
,\_foliation_ Al l Dace WOFk Ct)mpleted:
\dcirc's 1:\��cncy):1�e r'yff /j,llsh�rrlrc�� /U. /, Pht�rlc �ii?.: �13�15�`L./ [)--
S ig nature: DaLo: ZZ -7 _ _

Anitnal Waste Plan Certification
(Please tt'oe or print :it[ infCarsn:ttion that dots not reut:iu: a si«naturcl
Esistini ), or Ne`ti or Expanded (plc.tse circle one
General information: ,
Name of Farm: Facility No: W/ --
Owner(s) Name: i Phone No:7'zZ_ 6b35
:Nlaiiinp Address: Q e��Y
Fawn Location: Count` Farrn is lo[:a[ed )n;
ry Latitude and Lon2itudc': Mi—4-5 1 7T lntet�ratc)r.
Please attach a copy of a county road map with locatior) identified and describe Mow (Be specific: road
names. directions. milepost. etc.): Nob-kga ( a. e,_._��rr,►� r , S� 1S2-,+ , 401
Ooeration Description:
T+-pe of Sivine r�'o. of Anirrtdis
— Wean to Feeder
_I Fecdcr to Finish
Fan -caw [u Wean
J Farrow to Feder
D Farrow to Finish
`t Gilts
J Boars
T--pe of Poulin• rib, of Animals
~"�ayLr G0, poG�
Other T'rpe of Livestock-
Ttpe of'C:rt;le :Vo. of.-lnimals
D Dairy
�j f3cef
Number of ettrimals:
F_rpand�rig Operarron Only
Pre:roits Desf7mGaygci't,. �lddiiiarru! Desreii C.rpiuii�. I'or tl:Desr�n`G�warrr�: .
;acreage Available For Application: ��� --- Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons !Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (fN)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: )E5 or e O (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in [fie area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
�i,�it si rr t[iexis isM iexi,[xre+titia ie i,ies.��i�,L is se itH�it ae ae iaK i�ia ii ie a'x ai �4 ie�xie 4 ai i�ii isxis ai ai.�'a>;t�iax�s:s �e s. �i ai �i >i ie i��t Ht ai .ter i�.�K i, ai i.
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) veHfv that all die above infomaation is correct and will be updated upon changinU. 1 (We) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. 1 (we) know that any expansion to [he existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new aniriaals are stocked. ( (we) understand that there must be no discharse of
animal waste from the storage or application s�'stem to surface waters of dap state eidier directly dtrough a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the ? -year. 24-hour stoma and there must not be run-off from die
application of animal waste. l (we) unders[-artci that run-off of pollutanrs from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards dzveloeed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plant will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Watzr Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DELI or a new certification (if flee approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a ti a transfer.
Name of Land Owner: PC
Signature:
,.Name of Manager(if different gom
Signature:
AWC -- Au-,ust 1. 19971
Date: _ 12 JZ31-27_
Date:

D). Application and Elandlim" Egliipluent
Crack the uppropriare box
Existing fir ex andim facility with e.xistilia -astc am2licition e ui imen (\V P or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts aril tables and is able to apply waste as necessart v to accommodate the
waste management plant. (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the pian at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjusuntent Quidmice are c-',mained as part of
the plan). +Wy4k coedrdeans-See ztfekr-l�e�l
_1 New. expanded '.or exi-ying facility �yidtt�i�t.exi.stinu_t;t�ppiitation egmpi rent for 9CMV irriumion. (1')
,animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apple waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application et;uipme:tt can cover the area required b� die
plan at rotes not to exceed either die specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for tinning of
applications has been established: required but'fcrs cart be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance ;re
contained as part of t1w plan).
.y tiew. expanded, or e,xistim facility Without existin; waste ap lic:atinn euuirntem for land spreading not usin"
a.j,mv_iirriQation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in die plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste rrtanaQement plan: (pruposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for tinning of
applications has been established; required butters can he maintained: calibration and adjusunent guidance Wire
coruaincd as pact of ilte plan).
Narne.of Technical Specialist (Please Print)rEyeu.+--B e'!J Ue-
Affiliation N)eCS - Date Wor.%-, Completed:. /7-/7- 97
Address (AR enc }: ok S IS IAllws�TC-)L41g
MSG VQ7S Phone No.:2�2 - lyi -le77
Signature: Date:,f_
E) Odor Control, Insect Control. Mortality tNlanagetnent and Errtergencv Action Plan ISD.
St. WUP. RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste ,Nfanagement Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Nlanagemem Checklist and an Emergency action Plan. Sources of both odors artd
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Nlortaliry Management Plan and the Emergency .action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):._�r�
AtfiIiutiotz G(5' -fit. Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
Si�,nature: A),
Phone \�o.�1r)l�i✓17'-/c ='i--
F) Written Notice of Nesv or Expanding SN%,ine Farrn
The following signature block is an]v to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21. 1996. If the facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded}
1 (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
wbo ow-n property located across a public road. street. or highwav from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Lana Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if differem from Owner):
Date:
Signature:—
:OVC -- August
1997
Dare:

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (S1)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installeu
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certif-ication is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation
Address (A2ency):
Sivnature:
B) Land_ Application Site (NVUP)
Check th appropriate box
Date Work Completed:
Phone No.:
Date:
The cropping system is in plat:,- on all land as specified in the aninuil waste management plan.
_J Conditional Approval: all recIuired ]arid as specified in the plan is clearer] for planting: tie cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/davlvear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the waswutilization plan.
`1 Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly clearedd land within 30 Lb
-
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an lorerim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation tdS'1'2Z - lir_'!;'�5' _ _ DatL I-Vork Completed: /: ,./Z `; i
Address (Agency): / ^ %', v / T ,� //, //� / ; ��,�� A Z Phone
% - - -
Sivnature:
ate: i --j ? -_e �"?
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization phin.
and if appropriate to establish tte interim crop for erosion control. and Will submit to DELI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days Collo-in_g Ole date sprcifieti in tie corhditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a Violation of the waste manasentent plan and will subject rile (us) to an
enforcement action from DELI.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
dame of vianager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Date:
�«'C� Aw-lust 1. 1997 -1

lr
` C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC) A k
Fatality with ex[grior lots
Nlcdiods to minimize tic: run orf of pollutants front lounging and liea%'v uic rreas hate b4en installed as specified
ill the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
dame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (.agency): Phone ivo.:
SkMatur2: Date:
D) :1 polication and Handlin17 E ui priierit Installation 0-VUP or I)
Check the aapmpriare bloc.(
,-animal Waste application and handling ecluipnit!*nt spec:ific;d in the plan is e:: site and rc;idv for use:
calibration and adjusunew materials have: been provided to [he owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Allinial Waste application and handling equipnl4nt specified in [lie plan has not been installed but fate owncr
has proposed leasing or third p-,Tty application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with fate requirements or the plan: required buffers can be riminmined: Latibration arid
adjustritent guidance liave been provided to the owners and .we contained as part of die plan.
1 Conditional ;tall}r+twat: ;animal w;isw :spphLc:ltion ;ill;] ilaildli!! , c(plil)lu11nt speciticaf in the plait Ims
rJ' been purchased and will be on situ and installed by (a I �(mondi/d %I/ycar): U;cre is adequate
storage to bold die waitc until (lie eduipnient is installed and until [lie w.islc can be :and applied in
accordance widr tole cropping system couLtined in fate plan: and calibration and adjustment auic..:uce have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan. 7�— 5Q� c,dAc.Ae-W
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): re Kt
Affiliation_ L� SDA- M`QG_S_ _r Date Work Completed: Z
Address (Atrency): p4 • a k 8v8/_ ,(� _ a 7 7f Phone No.: 9 G:rsl le77
Signature:
Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in Ill D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have comtnitied to purchase the aninial waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DENI a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforc;.ment action from DE.M.
Fame of Land O%Yner:-� &Ale
Signature:_
dame of i' Ianager (if different f
Si(nature:
owner):
Date:_ L22Z3157
Date:
E) Odor Control, Tnsect Control acid Mortality-NIana--,ernent (SD. SI. WUP. RC or I)
-Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also be4n installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation_ Date Wor,\ Completed: /z Zz
Address (Agency):A,�2,un_Phone
Signature:
AWC -- Aw4ust t. 1997
Dale:_�,�z/zz/97 _

I'lease return the curul)iete{f furrtt to the Division of til�ater Qt.r,tlity at the Cullu��ittti a{lctres.5:
Depart nle"t of 1_:nvitutttrtcnt, Ifealtlt, and v;tturai Itcsuurces
I)iyisiuu Of Water Quality
Water- Quality Sectiutr. Conrl)liartcc (;roof)
Itafeiglt. i`iC 2762(bU535 -�
Please also remember. to subrttit a MY of this foal, with tine cs)utl)icte :uim l �1�aste q
yianagement Plan to-tite local Soil and %Water Conservation District (.}f'lice an{i to Steel) a cully
in vnur ides Nvitlt your ;\rtirrtaI Waste 'Matta4erttcnt 1'1art.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: GATES POULTRY FARM: MIKE AND SUE CLAYTON
DATE: 12-17-97
n . Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality - Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] if
the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm. If the
problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina Department
of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management - Raleigh
at 1-800-662-7956 or [phone]. Provide the following information:
FACILITY NAME: GATES POULTRY FARM
LOCATION: 6507 HOLIA RIDGE RD.,ROUGEMONT, NC 27572
REGISTRATION/PERMIT # : 68-1
E If there is danger to human life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 or the
ORANGE County Sheriff's Department at 732-8181 EXT. 2900.
ft Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby
irrigation fields if possible. See next page for additional action items.
n Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off site damage (list
the names and phone numbers of three below).
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
1
Mf-Cuilocj"s vr, Ina
33r.-3*,,4 - 24(0'3 (N 732-fi]z
2
f��1 -5,a- C cM
336 360 4- 2 131
3
n Contact the ORANGE Soil and Water Conservation District at (919-732-8181
_ Ext.2750.
n Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this
specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist
who has design approval such as the Area Engineer.
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
Tommy Burchette, CET
336 - 679 - 4863
Daphne Cartner, EIT
336 - 771 - 4600
Angela Jessup, CE (Area II Engineer) _
704 - 637 -2400
[al

The following are possible situations and corresponding action items that may be taken to
stop the release of wastes. Not all items are applicable to every farm.
I} Lagoon or waste storage pond overflow - actions include:
a Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
b Stop all flows to the lagoon/waste storage pond immediately.
* c Call a pumping contractor.
d Make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon/waste storage pond.
e Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
II) Runoff from waste application field - actions include:
a Immediately stop waste application.
b Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
III) Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers - actions include:
a Stop recycle pumps.
b Stop irrigation pump.
.c Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
IV) Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators - actions include:
a Stop recycle pump.
b Stop irrigation pump.
c Make sure no siphon occurs.
d Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
V) Leakage from base or s idewall of lagoon or waste storage pond. Often this is
seepage as opposed to flowing leaks - possible action items:
a Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all
seepage.
b If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals , fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and
lagoon/waste storage pond bottom as soon as possible.
2

Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
306 Revere Road • P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Phone: [phone] • Ext. 2750
Mike and Sue CIayton - Owner / Operator
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm - #68-1
Conditional Certification
The Clayton's, owners and operators of Gates Brothers Poultry Farm, # 68-1, are
currently working with E & E Equipment of Henderson, NC on an,evaluation of their
existing irrigation equipment.
The existing irrigation equipment is to be used to maintain adequate storage
capacity until such time as the existing system can be certified or a new system is designed
and installed. The Orange Soil and Water Conservation District and MRCS staff
recommended that, the Clayton's seek the assistance of a qualified irrigation specialist to
evaluate their existing system. The Clayton's need recommendations on improving the
efficiency of their existing system.
Mike and Sue have worked cooperatively with the District and NRCS staff
throughout the last two years.
Gail Hughes
Soil Conservationist

Poultry Layer Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
51►ttrcc Ca11sC 1311iPs to Minimize Odol 5ilc Sprcilic ('racticcs W
I atnlslcall • 110111H.), llroductiorl Vegetative or +vooded buffers;
Rccolmnended best management practices;
Good jlulgment and common sense
Flom sou faces (wall; - Wet clill)' surfaces E71 Scrape manure, dust, fealhcis into collection
aisles) alloys;
Cl Splash boards along upper ends of collection
alleys;
[� h0l)Cr ventilation
(lac nsalime chopping • 11'1a1IkiIC-coVC1Cd surfaces &r Scrape wamlrc into collection alleys
boards
N,lantlre collection alleys Partial microbial decomposition J 171equenl Illanuire removal by flush or scrape;
hd FICquClll checks and maintenance oil waterers
and lvatcr pipes
Vclllil;lliots exhaust fans Vulalilc gases; 64/ Fan mainleilance;
• Dust d Efficient air movement
llldovl' sill faces •
Dust
(9
Vactitim or +waslidown between hocks
1v1a1ilile CQIIVCyUtS •
llmtl:d miciublal decomposition
❑
KCCI7 mCC1101liCal Cililij)nlCtll 1n good ICllail';
Cor
Remove manure acctrlritilations promptly
Storage tank or basil:. 0
Partial microbial decomposition;
i7
Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface &
Mixing while filling;
O
"Tank covers;
•
Agitation when cnllityitlg
D
Basin surface :Hats of solids'
D
Proven biological additives or oxidants
1vlamtrc slurry or sludge -•
Agitation wheel spreading;
D
Soil injection ofshi rylsludges;
sprcader outlets .
Volatile gas clnksiolls t4Jfl
❑
Wash residual manure From spreader aver iise;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncoveled EIlallnle 9 Volatile gas emissions while D Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
sherry or sludge on field drying D Soil hicorporation within 481us.
surfaces
Outside drain collcction 0 Agitation during waslewalcr' D Box covers
or junction boxes convCyance
AN-10C - November 1 I , 1996, ['age 6

Source Cause ~ 13NIPS to Minilni7c Odor Site S1lccilic Pracficcs
Slandillg %vatcr wound lnihtohcr drain ige; 9 Grad[ and landscape such that water drains
Ficililics ♦ Mlcluhlal deconllmsittolt or ttwa}' mull[ facilities
organic [[latter
Manure tracked onto l'otlrl}, ntainl,linctl access roads ['arlll 1CCC$5 I'01t1 lllanilCilatlCC
public roads Crum I'.'trlll
ilcccss
Additional hil'Ormaliun :
Swilic M-mime a Mao-m-emcnt : 0200 Rule/l3MP I ackcl
Swine 1'roducficln Farm i'alcnlial Odor Sources and ltcntctlics ; 1 13AL' ['act Shcel
Swine Production Facility N-tanutc Management: 1'it Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; Iil3AE 128-88
Swine I'roduction Facility Mamrre Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; UAW- 129-88
Lat poll Design anti MaIT. ucnicnt for Livestock Mamtrc Tucalntenl and Storage ; E;1,A E 103-83
Calibration or NLnnnc and Wnslewatcr Applicalion Ia1ui11mcnl ; EI3AE Fact Shed
Conlrolling Odois From Switic Buildings ; I'll1-33
Em,hunincnlal Assurance l'rot;ram ; N1'11C Manual
Options Fur Managing Odor ; a icltvr! l'rulll the Swine Udor bask force
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manllic Mattacemenl: OdoTs and flies ; PROW, 1995 Conreretice i'roceedings
AM' ovenllicr 11, 1996, ilogc 5
Availal)lc Froill :
NCSU, County Estcnsiun Ccntcr
14CSU - BAF
NCSU - 13AE;
NCSU - 13AE
NCSU - 13A1
NCSU - 13AI;
NCSU - Swine E.xlcusion
NC Purk E'roditccis Assoc
NCSU Agri Communic ilions
Florida Coulicralive Exlcusiou

e� f.
Insect: Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Oulu cc Clause 11MI's to Control hlsects Site specific I'racticcs
Liquid Syslenls
d:iu,h (iutteis Accumulation ofsolids ❑ blush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids front
gutters as designed-
© Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Llgmms and Yits Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and hits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize Ole
crusling of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more Than 30% of snrlace.
-1 XCL:N ive Veactalive • Decaytngvegelauon
ijk1will
crJc•:, �— -- • Fccd Sllillage
Fee•1 5ueq:rl,c - Accunt•latiuus of feed residues
Maintain vegetative control along hanks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative hatter
along waters edge oil miponndillent's perimeter.
Dry Syslems
f-1 Design, operale and Illaiutaiu feed syslerles
hunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accuniulation of decaying wastage.
n- Chan up spillage on a routine: basis (e.g., 7 - Ili
(lily interval during Slllin••er; 15-30 day interval
during winler).
fl Iteduce moisture acconrol:•lion wilhin uod
aM1111d i•onle•li: le pel ineewl. of lived storage
areas try insuri•It; dr:•ilhige :nvay I"ror•1 silo
and/or providing adcqu:te comanupen (c.g.,
covered bin liar brewer's grain and similar high
Moisture grain pro(1r•cls).
f3 Inspect tier and remove or break l•p aecuau•I:ted
solids in Biel- strips around Iced slor;lge as
needed.
AMIC - Phweniber 11, 1996, 1'age I

Si,urec Causc IIMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Praclices
Animal I Iolding Areas Accumulations of aninial wastes CI Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and [Ceti wastage fences and other locations where waste .
accumulates and disturbance by aninluls is
minimal.
O Maintain fence rows and Cller'strips around
aninial molding areas to minimize
acctunulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
NY hianllre I landling • Accumulations of aninial wastes Cl Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Syslen►s day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
f7 Provide for adequate drainage around muoure
stockpiles.
CI Inspect for and remove or break tip accuntnlated
wastes in fi11Cr strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For nwre 11ll'Onllalioll conluct the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, Wall Carolina Stalc I Iniversily,
italcigh, NC, 27695-7613.
Ahllt: Owl- 11, 1996, I'age 2 fir;:_—_r

Mortality Management 1-Iethods
(check: which me:hcd(s) are being implemented)
r! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the -zround within ?' hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
J Renderina at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of A iculture
J Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value ;rithour endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARM Gates Brothers Poultry Farm Farm # : 68-1
DATE: 12-17-97
A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation —
is 2.0 feet level below
the settled top of dam.
A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be perfbrined at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway. The
inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back slope and
at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to check for signs
of damage due to vannint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A visual inspection
should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the structure is not
experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be brought to the
attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover sliall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment —pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc. --
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization plan.
The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
274 days or —9 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

Sheetl
'Pnu I4Yu
DaiTr*aste Storage Worksheet
Name of Operation
Gates Poultry
Number of Chickens
60000
chickens
Days Storage
365
days
% Confinement
100
%
Open Area in sq. ft.
0
sq. ft.
% Rainfall During Design Period
0
%
Pond Dimensions Length
320
ft.
Width
320
ft.
Depth
Average Inside Slope
4
2.5
ft.
:1
S4oYu�e
o iumn�_
Enter ESW Stage
0.5
Liquid & Solid Manure
73195
cu. ft.
0
cu ft.
Runoff From Open Areas
0
cu ft.
Rainfall - Evaporation on Pond
174421, 3333
cu ft
Total Liquid Volume Required
247617
cu ft
678
cu ft. 1 day
25 yr. Storm on Open Areas
0.00
ft.
(Assuming CN 98 and 6.1 in.
rainfall event)
25 Year Storm on Structure
0.5
ft.
Enter ESW Stage
0.5
ft.
Freeboard
1
ft.
Max. Liquid Level
2.00
ft. below top
of dam
Number Days Storage Vol.
274
days
Volume at Max. Liquid Level
186066.7
cu. ft.
Gallons at Max. Liquid Level
1391779 lGallons
elcva4.on used — orti,_Yy ,A A"Vo on
' Elevations o rnay.it+nu.rn l ivs i i"C( based on Orr a i rsat desr3n ejeva. (6YI5
r L a-9 ooy) cI Q S r,9 V, cJ
aeecUlrdr+q IM N2cs specs.
ici81 MCC-+- S�ccs.
Elegy, . 9+. 0 ,
tr l e vd+,O" Q3.0 "
Page 1

E & E FARM EQUIPMENT CO.
ROUTE 6, BOX 309
HENDERSON, NC 27536
919-438-4111 800.392-8262
October 5, 1998
To Whom It May Concern
This irrigation system installed on the farm of Mike Clayton was
designed with all buffers and set -backs in line with the State
and Federal regulations as listed in the 0-200's.
E. J. Knott III does certify that the system design is correct and
operating properly by the guidelines set up in the operations
manual and application rate set by the Orange Co. Soil & Water.
Sin erely
E.J. Kno II

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
-
1�d--�7
-Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field Not
and
Hydrant Noy
Travel
S Speed
! (fUmin)
I
A lication I
pp
Rate
(in/hr) I
TRAVEL LANE
r'ffective Effective
Width (t) Length (ft) �
Wet ed
Diameter
(feet)
Nozzle
'Diameter
{inches)
EQU!P-MENT Sciii !NGS
Operating Operating
0
Pressure Pressure
@ Gun (psi) rd .Reel (psi)
'
Arc
Pattern'
Comments
I
I
I>
t; I
s i,
�� I
�� !r
Ira
!
.7
i
j
s
'r
7o
�.l
r
S3
2a
R
3 3
= •i
I
, � I
d
c ���
5 I5
!
T
f
II
S� I
" o~L 1 I
i
r---�
/ 0
-�-
f i
!
7 tS
I
3:
C-C1
I
, , I
'j
7ti
p
to I
I
dw
-
I
".'.5ee attached map provided by the Field Office for field iocation(s).
7sFiow'separate-entries for each hydrant location in each 6d.
'Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F= (full circle), TQ (three quarters), I i (;,Yo thirds), H (half circle), T (one dNrd), Q (one quarter).
May also,use degree of arc in degrees.
Irrigation Parameters USDA -ARCS
October 1995 page_? North Carolina

IV
POW.
- ..:v 7.. c 1:w
JVIA; k Li
A*'V
V-II -
'TANI.
'A—". VdI
I

MPY 11 199 16:10
USDA
Natural Resources Conservation Service
PO Box 8181
Hillabor"h, NC 27278
Phone [phone] Ext. 3
r� February 16, 1999
J
FAX TPANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
TO: 'IR, h i
FAX#.- 7I<%
FROM: HILLSHOROUGH FIELD OFFICE - AI,e-
FAX# [phone]
91 ri 73Z- 8 /8 ! X Z7SS.3
This transmission consists of pages including
cover sheet.
COHMENTS :
hart Coj'�S Q ir1 i �Yja
-7Ad.0jjS. /
PAGE.0
s
V.

.IAY 11 199 16 : 1 0
S OTL & WATE R
PAGE.002
I is I
Onme soil 8 Water Natural Resourxes Conservation DMd Conservation service PO Box 8181
Phone: 91g-7324151, Fed. 2750 Phone: gib-s441079, Fxt. s Revgra R
Hiitsborough,
may 1], 1999
Mr, JR Joshi
Division of Water Quality
Non -discharge pem*ting Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 2762"535
Subject. Application No. AWP6
Crates Brothers Poultry
Ammal Waste County
Applfcati
Orange
Dear Mr. Josh
Enclosed is the additional Wbrmation requested by the Non,disahargo Pet WtdW
needed for en&eeiing review.
1. The lagoon capacity 40cunxntation sent earlier was the temporary sto or
only - not the total F rage vo]
PucdY. The enclosed spreadsheet shows the total volume
available_ This lagoon was dosigncd and built to NRC5 standards and specific
in 198).
2. The realistic yield expectations used in the waste utilization plan, are defFult
from the USDA-NBCS cvmgutwi�,:ed vraste utilization Plan
Please feel free to call if YOU have any questions or cvmarns. T Mk you for your
assistance,
Sincerely,
Gail Hughes
Soli Conservationist
OTU%IC Soil and Water Conservation District
cc: Gates Brothers Poultry FUM
Brent $ague
District Conservationist
USDA-NRCS-Orange Co.
i
1
.I
i.

IRY 11 199 16:11
pAGE.003
Wed
Pau! Waste Storage Wvrksheet
Namt of ..,
NZbcr of Cmckm
Gat's Down
6M W
chlckegs
Days S �Q-SF__ _
% Coftfimmen
365 da s
100
%
`�6 Ram&H Dun Design period
�---
0
Pond Dimeasiom ._ _ L:eu�r
Width
� r , � ` 320
32Q
It.
ft.
Av e Fide S10po
10
2.5
ft.
: I
Euw' ESW Stake
O 5
l ��.
Liquid & Solid Maa we
~117112
ft.
icu
RuwffFrain Areasoft.
Ralf, R - Evaporation an Fond
68522.67
cu ft
ToL+l Lr ui Vol auc Itcgwc:d_
., , 185635
509
cu ft
cu ft. !-day
25 yr. Scoria on 2n Areas
~ _.._.0.00
ft.
L&s =xrgCN 98 and 6 l ins
,
2S Year Storm an 5truatune
— 0.5
ft.
Eater fiSW S c .�.1... `
� .�+ .� 0.5
ft. �...
�.�
Mv- Uquid Level .�
2.00
of clam
ft. below tap
Number Aays Sttiiage Val.
~ _ �.. ~ 1325
Vohuoc at Max. L1 uid Level
673866.7
cu. ft�
C� at Max. L .d Level
5040523
Gallons
Fagc 1

State of North Carolina "7 NWA
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RECEIVED
Division of Water Quality Fla
February 1, 2001
Gail Hughes
Orange Soil & Water Conservation District
PO Box 8181
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Subject: Lagoon Closure Plan
Gates Brothers Poultry
Facility ##68-1
Orange County
Dear Ms. Hughes:
Upon reviewing the information in the lagoon closure plan
received Dec. 8, 2000 for the Gates Brothers poultry farm, it
appears that the closure could be implemented within acceptable
guidance to comply with the nondischarge requirements of the
Division of Water Quality. It is required to complete the
closure of the structure within a year of this approval. However,
there is some question as to the actual volume of solids that
must be applied, but the Consent Judgement allows for an
extension or modification to the time required to properly close
the lagoon should .it be determined that the task cannot be
completed as this initial plan projects. Any request for
extending the deadline must be made in writing to this office as
soon as it is determined that the original target date cannot be
met.
As this facility has received a General Animal Waste Permit
it will be effective for the term of the permit or until the
structure is certified as properly closed. The permit holder is
responsible to abide by the conditions in the permit that will
still be applicable to this closure. This includes but is not
limited to: notification requirements, no discharges of wastes,
and maintaining application records for wastes applied.

Gail Hughes; `--
Gates Closure Plan
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation
in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection please call Mr. Hunt at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kennet Schu r, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Phil Telfer, Dept. Of Justice
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

S OIL & WATER USDA
CO PSZRVJLT I Oil
Orange Soil & Water Natural Resources PO Box 8181
Conservation District Conservation Service 306 Revere Road
Phone: [phone], Ext. 2750 Prone: 919-644-1079, Ext. 3 Hillsborough, NC
27278
June 4, 2001
Mike and Sue Clayton (Gales Brothers Poultry Farm)
Your operation is granted an extension of'the wilsle appllcalloll window for pumping on
fescue.
'me lagoon is mandated to be closed by Feb. 1, 2002. "['his extension is granted so that
you may continue to pump the liquid waste out, of the lagoon and be able to begin
removal of the solid waste this fall so the closure can be completed in a timely manner.
The technical staff will continue to monitor liquid levels in the lagoon and the condition
of the vegetation where the waste is being pumped. This extension will be from June I,
2001 until Sept. I, 2001. If conditions of the vegetation deteriorate, then the technical
staff will recommend pumping be discontinued until weather- and vegetation conditions
improve. As operator of the farm, you need to continue to take waste samples and
record the irrigation times and anxounts.
Technical Specialist Signature_ qi
Date/�/
Technical Specialist Signature Date_ l

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mike Clayton
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Rd
Rougemont NC 27572
Dear Mike Clayton:
A44IT
0 •
•
v 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
- w
December 30, 1999
fir
!iLEIG,
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeepi g"`--- -J-.
Animal Waste Management System
Facility NumberkK-13
Orange County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, 1RR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledt10% post -consumer paper

DRAFT F10W690
PLAN OF ACTION
HIGH LAGOON LEVELS AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
l
T /? •DEF11�1R RALEIGH REGMIAL OFFICE
Faciltity Dumber, ` County _.
Fa�;ihty Name: P S , _tA. 10, ie-
Certified Operator: } � ���ly�n rt
1. Current t:rccbcard L,evel(s):
Structure I Structure 2 Strliclurc 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
2. Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) calculatcd to be contained in the waste that must be removed from each lagoon
in order to reach the freeboard level needed for both stuctueaI'stability and the 25 year, 24 hour storm event:
Structure 1 Structute 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Pounds of PAN: r
_.....
PAIN calcula-d to be contained in the waste generated daily by the animals that are proposed to be at the
facility; 1 Q Pounds PAN per day.
4. Total Pan that can be added to the fields and crops identified in the facilities CAWMP (Please attach a listing of
the fields and the PAN that can still be applied to each field); 3:3 -C— Total Pounds of
PAN
5. If waste is to be pump and hauled to another Iocation(s), please attach a list of the proposed sites, a summary of
the gallons proposed to be removed to each site, and the total PAN contained in the waste proposed to be taken
to each site, Please contact and reeeivc approval from the Division of Watcr Quality before removing any
waste from, a lagoon to a site not covered by the CAWNIP that covers that lagoon.
6. If animals are to be removed from the facility, please attach a schedule on which the animis will be removed.
7. Using the information listed in 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 above, please attach an explanation On how the waste will be
managed at this facility to reduce the freeboard to the levels rcquired levels . This explanation must include a
project schedule by which the lagoon(s) will be lowered to the level required for both the structural stability and
the 25 year, 24 hour storm event storage.
I hereby certified that I have reviewed the information listed above and attached and to the best of my knowledge and
ability the information is accurate and correct,
Facility Owncr/M nager (PRINT)
Facility Owne ana (Signature)
Date: Date;
Technical Specialist Name (PRINT)
Technical Specialist Namt (Signature)
Phone: �3 Phone:
jo
NdLO' S"'Ses [-9 1— l

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` •
Division of Water Qualify
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1:3E=-HNF;Z
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Mike Clayton
Gates Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Rd
Rougemkont NC 27572
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Gates Poultry Farm
Facility Number 68--1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535, N,*AWf
EAX 919-733-2496
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

4- ..A
REC RD OF COMMUNICATION WITH NC DOA -STATE VETERINARIAN
Division of Water Quality ❑ Division Of Soil and Water Conservation
Notification of Improper Disposal of Animal Carcasses
Farm Name: A► )t-ry Facility ID: 69 —/ County: 0it
...
Location: Y i"� d T i ly Kd -.
Responsible Party / Owner's Name: /tij e. C 41
r z - -- _ --
Contact Name:
Phone #: 1-7 3 2 ` 16 V
Address: 6 � Na��y 4 Aile .
City: 1C Du. ye. M Zip:2 7S 7-Z,
a
On Site Representative Notified of Improper Disposal:
Name: A) Phone #. Date/ Time:
Response to notification: _ 9 t Dnse _ 7� W 6 r _ d CA :as
Regional / District Office: h -t l e Date/Time Carcasses Discovered; 2T I_ ? q
Inspector's / Reviewer's Name: C-h aT l e ivo V-e L Phone #:
Carcasses discovered as a result of:
Complaint: Inspection: Operational Review: Other:
Animal Type: C� 264A) Number of Carcasses: _�7, 36 Condition:. r..—&,J NeS
Location(s) of Disposal Site: 141—T6n3
Comments:
NC State Veterinarian Contact (Name):
Title: —Phone: Date/Time:
Other agencies involved/contacted: Name appropriate agency, give contact name, date and time of contact.
Please send form to:
NC State Veterinarian -Department of Agriculture
Dr. Andy Mixson, Director of Animal Health
Agricultural Building
1 W. Edenton Street
P.O. Box 26026
Raleigh, NC 27611
phone: [phone] faz: [phone]
cc: Facilities Assessment Group
File `

Physical Address: _ �, �u'� t �L4{ f rm e F8.
Mailing Address: _5a4�y
Type of Operation: Swine '---poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 10axe t'aucas NumberofArimalsonSite: (ay� 000 9LYerS
a t �t Q tt
Latitude: � 12 Longitude: ��i 00 9.0
Type of Inspection: --Ground Aerial'
Circle Yes or No
Does the Anirnal Waste L=gcon have suffident freeboard Foot _ 25 year 24 hcur stcrm event
(approximately 1 Fcct + 7 inches) Yes or No
actual Freeboard:
Fee; • -.. inches
For facilities with more than one lagocn, please address the other lagoons' fr4ebeard under the
cornments sectlon.
Was any seepage observed from the Iagocn(s)? Yes or ,N
Was there erosion of the dam? Yes or V
Is adequate land available for land applicaticn? C21 . or No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or INIo
Fax to [phone]
t�OO per
Sh requires immediate adendcn
FadlZy number
SITE: VISITATION RECORD
Date: .1995
r�1ifEIE%
Owner: _ tA OLNfTO" _ Farm Name. G Ares Pc<L+_r2 h'11zM
County: Ot-raabi~
Agent Visiting Site: Lo'" lAv-1- t<o_+rol e hone: (` 14)" 2 3:�- v %I ZgSo
Operator G-A MC + due CLp 14 -Wa Phone: (n 19) 'T - 60 ! 5
On -Site Representative: Mt�i� fi Suc C Lr�+{ raa_ _ Phcne:
4
klm Cis D C, A
—:j_ t t C 'M(Z 0 Oct rLk
e .e j n a �k 0-f
o F Ciay�vns-
Signature of Agent

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
September 19, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RCGEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougen"iont, North Carolina 27572
Subject: Notice of Violation
Facility # 68-1
Gates Poultry Fain
Orange County
Dear Mr, Clayton:
On August 19, 1997, Teri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional Oflice conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is part of the Divisions efforts to detenuine compliance with the State's animal waste
nondischarge rules.
The inspection dctetimined that the poultry operation was not discharging wastewater into waters of the State at the time of
the inspection. However, conditions gist! that should he addressed immediately to prevent an illegal discharge. Illegal
discharges of wastewater to suiface waters of the State are subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, per violation.
1: The amount of fi-eehoard in Your lagoon was inadequate. Animal waste lagoons are required to maintain enough
frechoard (19 inches) so that no discharge of wastewater will occur during any rainfall event less sever than
a 25 year/24 hour storm.
2. Since the pipe in the backside of your lagoon currently serves no lawliil purl)ose and waste was observed
leaking from the elbow joint, the pipe must be removed. 1 understand that following the inspection you sought
the technical assistance of the Orange Soil and Water Conservation District in the removal of the pipe and
repair of the lagoon wall. I encourage you to proceed with their recommendation in timely manner in order to
prevent a discharge of wastewater to ►voters of the State.
Please re,-pomd in writing to this office, within 14 days of receipt of this letter, outlining your specific plans to correct these
problems. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding
this inspmtion please tali Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Sc us cr, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Depailment
Brent Bogue, Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group 3800 Barrett Drive, Sulle 101 " Ralelgk NC 27609
RRO Files Voice (919)5714700 " FAX (919)571 r4718
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

r
❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operat>low'Revicw +
����^
�;� ���.� b��' [►�WQ�An><lnal Feedlot Operation S><te Inspection � . �� ; ��x� �
a'2.
toutine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number lc Time of Inspection (~41 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑N�o�ytOperational Date ................LLaa'st Operated:.........................................._.......»..............A................................................................................
FarmName:..`5.....4.....1............................................... Connty:...�,t.Y .............. ..... ........
LandOwner Name:...A..1,�?�..... �.1` .... .......................... ........................ Pbone No:. � YAh....�:.��.�..s�..........................
Facility Conctact:....�..``..``4.. Title:...V��................. Pholne No:...............................
Mailing Address: ......��......�?.lt .��K �C,ll`....��.:..t.....?..4�...f....!�1�................... .......................
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator:.... ,'+1. .r U................................. ........... ....I Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: I'.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [a agoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes a<
❑-7es ❑ No
2 es ❑ No
❑ Yes EKo
❑ Yes
G-No
Wes
❑ No
❑ Yes
U-No
❑ Yes
9-Ko
Continued on back

Facility Number: AW� . ...... k...D
6.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
&Wo
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
®-Ko
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
[}Nip
StrMctures
(Ijq=ns and/or lioldiBZ Qnft
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Bles
❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
IN IM,
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
EWo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[moo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? aV s 4'V)
des
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses ank, a�r�fl�SiC\q�
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
0' 'es
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
BIWo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .........................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
na p W �p
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for ]and application? y,,�� 5 � Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement? "'��L <Aqc f,
❑ Yes
&W
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E-46-
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
['Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Facilities
❑ Yes
❑-1—
For
22.
Certified Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments',(refer to question #) Explam;any YES answersand/orany �recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings:6f facility to better explain situations�.(use additional=pages as necessary) v a
' a
Reviewer/Inspector Name !L " "`MORWE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: `['�- {�C, �� cu�Q. Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, FadVy Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Note To: Ken Schuster
Thru: Judy Garrett (f
Thru: Charles Alvarez Cf A
From: Terri Hollingsworth -TIA
Subject: Gates Poultry Farm Enforcement ! Q (_76,,4
�J
I recommend this facility be removed from the enforcement list based on the following
information. A facility inspection (8/19/97) found a pipe in the back of the lagoon which had been
turned upward with an elbow joint to prevent a discharge of waste from the lagoon. According to
owner, the pipe was installed by the previous owner for the purpose of dewatering during
construction. The inspection determined that the elbow joint was leaking slowly and had created
a puddle of waste in a low area adjacent to the elbowed -pipe. At the time of inspection the waste
was contained in this low area, there were no visible signs of waste in the adjacent field, and there
was no nearby surface water.
Based on my recommendation during the inspection, the owner immediately contacted the Orange
Soil and Water Conservation District for technical assistance in removing the pipe and repairing
the lagoon berm. According to the Orange SWCD, the owner moved promptly to implement
their recommendation and proceeded under their supervision. A subsequent inspection
(11/18/97), by Margaret O'Keefe (DSWC), documented the removal of the pipe and repairs.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please see Judy or Charles.

Note To: Ken Schuster
Thru: Judy Garrett 41
Thru: Charles Alvarez l l a/18
From: Terri Hollingsworth -M ` �, 6 �,-,%
Subject: Gates Poultry Farm Enforcement
I recommend this facility be removed from the enforcement list based on the following
information. A facility inspection (8/19/97) found a pipe in the back of the lagoon which had been
turned upward with an elbow joint to prevent a discharge of waste from the lagoon. According to
owner, the pipe was installed by the previous owner for the purpose of dewatering during
construction. The inspection determined that the elbow joint was leaking slowly and had created
a puddle of waste in a low area adjacent to the elbowed -pipe. At the time of inspection the waste
was contained in this low area, there were no visible signs of waste in the adjacent field, and there
was no nearby surface water.
Based on my recommendation during the inspection, the owner immediately contacted the Orange
Soil and Water Conservation District for technical assistance in removing the pipe and repairing
the lagoon berm. According to the Orange SWCD, the owner moved promptly to implement
their recommendation and proceeded under their supervision. A subsequent inspection
(11/18/97), by Margaret O'Keefe (DSWC), documented the removal of the pipe and repairs.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please see Judy or Charles.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
James B. Hint, Jr., Governor EDF=HNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Mike Clayton
Gates Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Rd
Rougemkont NC 27572
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Gates Poultry Farm
Facility ID #: 68-1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR Steve W.Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System NW Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission �a An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 11119M 50% recycied/10% post -consumer paper

r
1,
NOV ROUTING SLIP
1)Type of violation (pick one):
illegal discharge
T (discharge)
oil spill
_ (oil spill)
inspection of minor source
_ (inspectnun)
inspection of major source
_ (inspectmaj)
pretreatment
_ (pretreat)
wetland
(wetland)
poultry operation
(poultry)
swine operation
(swine)
dairy/cattle operation
(cow)
other
(other)
2) Will the vio. result in a recommendation
of enforcement? (y, n, ?)
3) Is the violation resolved? -40
4) Target date for enforcement report?fq-
5) Comments (50 spaces) loll {rcels+'ar�_
6) Routing (initi I/date):
eAt
0
Ors, ! 0/ 2--
50-11'r'

a,;,
• State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt', Jr., Governor DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
September 19, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougcmont, North Carolina 27572
Subject: Notice of Violation
Facility #'68--r---
Gat�ultgfarm—
(Orangc-Coun .g
Dear Mr. Clayton:
On August 19, 1997, Teri I lollingswo0h fi-om the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine conlplianee with the State's animal waste
nondischarge rules.
The intiT.,ection determined that the poultry operation was not discharging kN,aste„vater into waters of the Slate at the time of
the inspection. However, conditions eristo that should be addressed inunediately to prevent an illegal discharge. Illegal
discharges of wastewater to surface: waters of the State are subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, per violation.
1. The amount of fi•e eboard in your- lagoon was inadequate. Animal waste lagoons are required to maintain enough
freeboard (19 inches) so that no discharge of wastewater will occur during any rainfall event less sever than
a 25 year/24 hour storm.
2. Since the pipe in the backside of your lagoon currently serves no lawful purl-)ose and waste was observed
leaking from the elbow joint, the pipe must be removed. I understand that following the inspection you sought
the technical assistance of the Orange Soil and Water Conservation District in the removal of the pipe and
repair of the lagoon wall. I encourage you to proceed with their re convnendition in timely manner in order to
prevent a discharge of wastewater to Neuters of the State.
Please rc--,Txin uniting to this office, within 14 days of receipt of this letter, outlining your specific plans to con ect these
problems. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding
this inspection please call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Sc lus cr, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Orange County Hcalth Department
Brent Bogue, Orangc Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
is DWQ Compliance Group 38M Barrett Ihive, suite 101 * Raleigh, NC 27609
PRO Files Voice [phone] * FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 12, 1998
Mike Clayton
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemont NC 27572
SUBJECT: Designation of a Certified Operator in Charge .
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Facility # 68-1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
North Carolina General Statute 90 A-47.2 requires the owner of each animal waste
management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid
animal waste management system, to designate a properly certified operator as the
Operator in Charge (OIC). Our records indicate that the OIC you previously
designated is no longer a certified animal waste management system operator.
As the owner of a registered animal operation with an animal waste management
system, you must designate a certified animal waste management system operator as
the Operator in Charge. Enclosed is an Operator in Charge Designation Form
specifically for your facility. Please return this completed form to this office by
June 12, 1998. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as
absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for
your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge.
If you have any questions regarding the certification of an operator, or need assistance
in locating a certified operator in your area, please contact
Cindy Dudley with the Technical Assistance and Certification Unit at
[phone] ext. 309.
cd/Desig, of certified OIC
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Sincerely, I. ot`pff,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance & Certific,
Ll �tLf34�i�i�L V C S ��
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMI$91ON
P.O.BOX 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50`Yo RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mike Clayton
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
6507 holly Ridge Rd
Rougemont NC 27572
Dear Mike Clayton:
F?WA
IT 0 0
c�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
April 12, 1999
. � n
13 1999
` Subjecti.Application No. AWP680001
Additional Information Request
Gates:Brothers Poultry Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Orange County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by May 12, 1999:
Lagoon capacity documentation is unclear. For instance, a 60, 000 cu ft. layer operation should have at
least 600, 000 cu. ft. (10 cu. ft./bird?) of treatment volume. However, the spreadsheet provided shows only
186, 067 cu ft. total volume. Please clarify this discrepancy and provide additional information, if required.
2. The realistic yield expectations used in your waste utilization plan (Table 1) for Fescue graze for Hrb (
Herndon) and Lg (Lingum ) soil series appear to be higher than current NRCS recommendations. Please
clarify this discrepancy and provide justification for the higher yields.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter, must be submitted on or before May 12, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the
Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
J�Pharge
Stist
Non- Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

M•�
6AA,
NCDENR
Exv{ao&%Amm "a Noaum L-RC-joLmcrn
NEW MAILING ADDRESS:
RALEIGH REGIONAL
OFFICE
DEPARTMENT OF
EavIROKKENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
1 628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC z7699-1 628
PHYSICAL LOCATION (44CIT A
MAILING ADDRESS)
3B00 BARRETr DRivE, RM 1 01
RALEIGH, NC 27609
VOICE: 9 1 9/57 1-4700
FAX: [phone] l B
F-
A
x
PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW
MAILING ADDRESS! !
p
AA % L TIC L fSR- 114. 6 11
TO: Mi U `�- FAX: '132 C. S
4
FROM: fl,,j N u T`
SUBJECT. Sf , L-L 3L3 DATE_ 3 1 1 cm
MESSAGE:
— S r D R T� Lrs E,a.m fo. 13AL Q f L .--
'" .,ToP rA&= kzkSTE I c -,[, ic, r4e-
qq2 'fib AL(. A)4s7-6-
C c _

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mike Clayton
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Rd
Rougemont NC 27572
Dear Mike Clayton:
0! � "! W, A
IT 0
A&4 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL. RESOURCES
December 8, 1999
1
f-+
_f
1 p
0-�
Subject: Conditional Approval _
Animal Waste Management, System _
Facility Number 68-1
Orange County
Our records indicate that your facility was conditionally certified in order to fulfill the requirements of
completion of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan Certification. This letter is to inform you of your
unresolved conditional approval status. Any facility receiving a conditional approval must notify Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) in writing within 15 days after the date that the work needed to resolve the conditional certification
has been completed. Any failure to notify DWQ as required, subjects the owner to an enforcement action. As of
December 7, 1999, we have no record of any information from you, advising us of the status of your conditional
approval. Therefore, please fill out the attached form and have your technical specialist and landowner sign the form
in the appropriate areas.
The completed form must be submitted to this office on or before 45 days of receipt of this letter. Please be
advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to
provide DWQ with proper notification of your conditional certification status or possible failure to comply with the
requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management plan by December 31, 1997.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
extension 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

3Pj;q ima80 640x480 pixels
l of 1 11/26/02 3:41 PM

JPi t image 640x480 pixels
I of 1 11/26/02 3:40 PM

:^.""4.1514"jai"!lTR1?IR,?rc•�'y"t�n"ry+^*a'T,� .,m�.

SCIL & VATM
C O w S■ R v A S a o w
Orange Soil & Water PO Box 8181
Conservation District Hillsborough, NC 27278
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE; I %/Z 516Z,
TO: 17Z) 17�S%EP—
FAX NO .:� 9_ 7/7/�
FROM: ORANGE SWCD ---
FAX # : [phone]
This transmission consists of .� pages including
cover sheet.
COMMENTS:
z
ald�wu
�J ijyZo40 , e 1
9urs�reYts.
i

I
Oct. 17, 2002
Gail M. Hughes
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278
SL"BfECT: Gates Brothers Poultry Lagoon Closure
Dear Gail,
After reviewing the waste management plan and the Closure procedures used at the Gates
Brothers Poultry Lagoon Closure, I concur that the lagoon was closed in accordance to
the plan and the USDA -MRCS standards and specifications.
Due to the wet weather, Mr. Gates has not completed all of the seeding needed on the
closed lagoon area, but has agreed to do this with a hand seeded as soon as possible. 1
recommend that the local District and NRCS staff follow-up with Mr. Gates to ensure
that additional seeding has been completed.
If 1 can be of further assistance, please .feel free to call me at 336-679-4863, ext.#5.
Sincerely,
Tommy Burchette
USDA-NROS
P,O. Box S
Yadkinville, NC 27055

A
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet th6 2H .0200 registration requisesnents. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number; F — 1
Farm Name: a RTF5 &rd 4W3 . po&Lt,r
Owner: M i kc
Mailing Address: 6607 _/Iv Rr�9t
N6• e? 76172
County:
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
di-y litter poultry opcf-ation
out of business/no animals on ,Site
closed out per NRCS standards
_ below the threshold (kss than 250-switte. 100•confined c;fidc. 75-hoists. 1000•sheep or
10.000•poultry with a liquid animal waste monttgemcnt system)
Comments:
1 am aware that even though I amy qualify to he removed from Ilse animal nperadons registration database, the
Uirec ioe of the Divisicr or Water Quality (DWQ) mny still require me to nbtain a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP) or an individual permit for this facility. This decision will be made based On this
facility's actual or potential impacts On surface waters of the State of North Cnrolin7. t am also aware that should I.
in the future. decide to rcpopulate lhia fat ility at or below the originally registered rwrnhcr of animals, i am required
to obtain a CAWMP and request tcactivation ofthe facility froth the DWQ prior to stocking animals. Any expansion
so ibis facility %voulcl rcquilc me to apply for, and obtain a permit priur to expansion.
Signature, ZzA Date: /1- J-dA
Jr
Please return completed form to:
NC Division of Water Q.rigility
Nora -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Fwd: Lagoon Pictures
Subject: Fwd: Lagoon Pictures
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:42:59 -0400
From: "Gail Hughes" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
JD,
attached are photos.
Photo Clayton#3- is far corner where they started, looking toward the chicken house.
Clayton#2 -(standing at same spot) down the left side of lagoon, sludge remove and d
Clayton#1- standing on the "lime pile" at the chicken house, photo toward the equipm
It started raining here about lunchtime, so I guess they had to stop work. Will chec
see yal gait
Subject: Lagoon Pictures
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:31:1 S -0400
From: "Brent Bogue" <[e-mail]>
.To: "Gail Hughes" <ghughes@co. orange. nc.us>
Here are the pictures for J.D.
Brent
Name: Clayton3.JPG
Clavton3.JPG Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
Encoding: base64
Name: Clayton2.JPG
Clayton2.JPG Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
Encoding: base64
Name: Clayton 1.JPG
Clayton LJPG Type: JPEG Image (image/jpeg)
Encoding: base64

JPEG it*e 640A80 pixels
Z' Q �,�j
1 of 1 7/25/02 3:56 PM

���� "ry $ ;,.. ;gip „d or",,,',r°-:w. "d^C. k � .> '°a'„"`.° � . " „g �y'" �t•�V 1
-77n
,}} ! y,P&Y r �. "5'r,4iti.: A ! , r I _ i. ud i ! 7. ��•, s d,I �� c aX� Al
�;`lt �� `5h 6�E s� �q��e k�i3 �� �'�,1 �' '< '�* •+.+.�y;�R-�� . [1� ,�„., �e" � �n+x +°�. �4�'�� �,�`�` i, y� ::raw
..y�L S L�4. �l .f+V^� L:.iL"w�r+'v'.✓�Y-�°��^r�i � ''f M pA i � •.i I� -��P - k '�•�� � 1 �; 3.
-`' �5% r,p !° rat v ^L. .ha .k v^^^ r'*,,, •« r r ""�. jyr,. ,� a_'+ �-.
-= dY��:.�`'+r.T��o�:s��-�. '.}yJrs��_ '�r'�ti�.:Y�'�i�-�-.�sw..1r- ����*L �..: T�•��-..-...,_ �. ..:tip e.. �`i�.

ti• !
717
yes I rtE ` t+ 't 1
to 0-
�� r��i,"' 'I� {YSY r� ' s.��� � f �{ x �'.`" �'`�hrc���?���°Fee��„'°''a.„•' a rs�i�f��.'�.Yr w��`.�ri *"�.�Q 'y,"y.�.� �y,,;'
_.ce �d::r�'� fw'•��; IR '� � � � r""""."""n ""`."Jias��... w � r � acsw. � ... � L;f'�':� s�`3e'i+*§..+'"'�+r�" :.
•�h �Tr's�"Av�. s" •��i"i""i.'r..'?�ar..��� :9'."vi�°Vlnj�s��3b`1�ak.n ., .w w.. L- S:Yi�•w�.vw.�`yw:�.�. .«`.� ,"'it. w'�`t1i .. A ••7 � -

r%1tR Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
r Division of Water Quality
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 22, 2002
5-01 i U :.
Mr. Mike Clayton
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemount, NC 27572
Subject: Lagoon Closure Extension Request
Gates Brother Poultry Farm
Animal Permit No. AWP680001
Dear Mr. Clayton:
The Raleigh Regional Office has reviewed your extension request for the subject.
lagoon closure. After due consideration and consultation with-O ange County Soil and
Water Conservation District, the August 1, 2002 closure extension is granted.
We have no objection to the finalization of the lagoon closure on-ox, be ore
August 1,2002. Please be advised this extension includes the removal of all lagoon
liquids and solids in a method approved by this agency and current NRCS lagoon closure
guidelines.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Jarwin (JD)
Hester or John Hunt at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster,P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: DWQ/RRO file copy
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District/ Gail Hughes
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Fpleigh, NiZ; 27699-1628 919. 571.4700
FAX [phone]
NEW
Customer Service
1 800.623.7748

7
fl
"^ i
00—
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr_, Secretary
North Carolina Department Environment
G
ar
of and Natural Resources
li
W3
Raleigh Regional Office
�C
Gregory J. Thorpe, Rh.D,
lawActing
Director
✓
Division of Water QuAty
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 22, 2002
Mr. Mike Clayton
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemount, NC 27572
Subject: Lagoon Closure Extension Request
Gates Brother Poultry Farm
Animal Permit No. AWP680001
Dear Mr. Clayton:
The Raleigh Regional Office has reviewed your extension request for the subject
lagoon closure. After due consideration and consultation with Orange County Soil and
Water Conservation District, the August 1, 2002 closure extension is granted.
We have no objection to the finalization of the lagoon closure oil or before
AuguIL1,2002. Please be advised this extension includes the removal of all lagoon
liquids and solids in a method approved by this agency and current NRCS lagoon closure
guidelines.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Jarwin (JD)
Hester or John Hunt at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster,P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: DWQ/RRO file copy
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District/ Gail Hughes
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 919, 571.4700
FAX 919.571,4718
NCDEW
Customer Service
1 800.623.7748

I/
A
NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919� 733-2655 Report No: W02492 W
Grower: Clayton, Mike Copies To:
6507 Holly Ridge Rd.
-� Rougemont, NC 27572
�J JE gig= WsteAnalysis R-ghort Farm:
10/ 4/01 Orange County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results artsper million unless otherwise noted
Sample 10.
N
P K Ca
Rg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
Mo Cl C
001
Waste Code:
ALP
Description.
PoultryLagoon Liquid
Total 61.9
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
52.2 1509 99.4
59.5
42.6 2.19 0.33 0.50 0.24 1.72
_
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li H-/ SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE K al
445 "W,
(�
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs/l000 allons
Application Method
Irrigation
N P205 K20
0.27 0.70 12.1
Ca Mg S Fe
0.58 0.35 0.25 0.01
Mn
T
Zn Cu B Mo Cl
T T 0.01
Iva Ni Cd
3.7
Pb Al Se Li
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results (pa per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID.
N
P K Ca qq
S Fe
Mn Zn
Cu B
Ma CI C
002
Waste Code:
ASP
Description:
Poultry Lagoon Sludge
Total
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
2345
14195 811 293975 4731
669 974
178 124
10.4 17.5
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se U H% SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE tons
1405 ,Y
V
82.22 91.25 1.20
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop__lbs/ton
wet basis
Other Elements
lbs/ton wet basis
Application Method
Broadcast
N
1.7
P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn
37.4 i.3 338.4 5.5 0.77 1.1 0.20
In Cu B
0.14 0.01 0.02
Mo C1
Na Ni
2.3
Cd Pb Al Se Li

NGUH H ronomic ufvision
4JUU Keen 'GreeK Koaa..Kaiel
n,.NL. ZIbU/,rb4b5 ky IUJ
/ S,S-Zb= . Grower:: uayton,:MIKe
Ke ort No: WUZ49ZPq Z.
Sam W Info.
Laboratory Results (pa per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P
K Ca M
S Fe Mn
Zn Cu 0
Mo Cl C
003
Total
16270
36750
7671 101014 24106
4582 9195 642
673 205 32.6
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ASP
-NO3
Na
Ni Cd Pb
Al Se Li
pH SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE tans
Description:
OR-N
2370
37.34
Poultry Lagoon Sludge
urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Avai labl e -for Fi rst:Crop
ibs/ton (wetbasis)
OtherElements
lbs/ton (wet basis
Application Method
N
P205 K20 Ca
Mg S Fe Mn Zn
Cu, B .Mo
Na. _- Ni
Cd Pbi,:: AI - Se
Broadcast
5:2'
44.0 5.5 - 56.0.
12.6 2.9 48° 0 34 , 0.35
0.11 0.02

,
S H... E..E T
Fax 0:
rs
Subject:
Date:
Wages. induding this cover shEec.
i
COMMENTS:
jr
FAX
From ih
Donartment of Justice
P, 0, Box 629
Raleigh. NC 27602-0629
(919) 71C-65Da
Fax, [phone]
10'd
t•
T0, 6 30 99L9-9i�-6I6:x2J N011DIS QNU7 2 �Ii'jm

i
STATE ATE OF NOPTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OFbRJANGE `2 -U-
STATE OF NdRTH CAROIJ, 'A','ex !}
MICHAEL,F. EASLEY, Attofrrizy,_. }
General and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN )
Sccretar\,, North Carolina Department o j
Eriviro=ncnt, alnd Natural j
Resources, }
Plaintiff, )
MIKE CLA.YTON &b/a GATES )
BROTHERS POULTRY 1~APM �
Defendant. j
,N THE GENERAL COURT OF JUS T iCE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
00 CVS 251
CONSENT ORDER
This (matter came on for hearing before the Court upon the rnotion of the State of North
Carol:::a for a P�elinlinary Injunction and the Consent Order entered by the Court on IMay 5,,
2000. "the parties have notified the Court that then have agreed, as evidenced by the signatures
of their co = sel elow, to extend the Ternporan• Restraining Order previously entered in this
matter and t s t a heaz-, g on the State's motion for Preliminary Injunction for the term
beginning July I q, 2000, subject to the following terms.
Tn�� Defe;dant, by consent to the entn of this Order, does not %naive any defense
he night haves to the entry of the Preliminary Injunction requested by the State.
2, i Thy State reserves the right to petition the Court for further relief prior to the July
10, 2000 heariind should a chance in conditions at the Gates Poultry Farm make such further
relief necessar� for, the protection of health or the environment.
IT IS
Covet on F
FO:EZE ORDERED that tine Temporary Restraining Order entered by the
S. 2000 shall remain in effect until dissolved by further order of the Court.
b0:8 T0, 6 ;50 99L9-9T�-6T6:XP� NEIIS]S QNe� 2 �Iie'1

' i-.. I5 i-UR"I'i ff R ORDERSD that a nearing o, the S.ate's Motion for i , immat
Injumctlan;shall be held in the Superior Court for Orange County in Hillsborough, North
Carolina, ply t�c 1 Oth day of .i1112000, at 10.00 7. m., ar s" Soon tixer(,arter as tlic matter mZiv hC
izeard.
T Iis the .�-L day of v*'h�, 2000.
Superior Court Judge Presidinb
CONSENT!
For Plaintiff State ofNofth Carolina:
Pi
For Defendant Mike Clayton d/b/a/ Gates
Poultry Fare:
9 �9-GIB-6I6:xpJ NOIJI]S QNd� 2 �3idf

NC ❑EN N vSP-1
Dom' (12/98)
NORTH CAROL.INA AGRICULTURE COST SHARE PROGRAM
APPLICATION FOR ASSISTANCE
r-%PPm_C11 it
NAME: Gates Brothers Poultry SSN: 56-1608797
BUSINESS: 6507 Holly Ridge Rd. FED ID:
ADDRESS: Rougemont, NC 27572
DISTRICT SUPERVISOR? NO XX YES
Landowner
NAME: SSN:
BUSINESS: FED ID:
ADDRESS:
DISTRICT SUPERVISOR? NO YES
COUNTY:
APPLICATION NUMBER:
FACILITY NUMBER:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Orange
68-2001-05-09
i
I 68-01
NCACSP
LATITUDE: 36 deg. 12' 45"
RECEIVING WATERS:
14 DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT
ASSOCIATED GOVT. PROGRAMS/PROJECT:
North Fork Little River
03020201020010
LONGITUDE: 79 deg. 0' 16"
euse319
C] PL 566 E TVA G CREP0. E
'If applicant or landowner is part of a business, complete business information with SSN and Fed ld#. If applicant is not the landowner, complete
landowner information and have all parties sign all forms, or provide a copy of 10 year lease in lieu of landowner signatures.
1. Directions to site. Farm located on SR 1524 - Holly Ridge Rd - , approximately 2 miles Northwest of Intersection with' SR 1525.
2. Type of agricultural operation. 60,000 layer, poultry operation
3. Was this operation in existence prior to May, 1992? Yes X No If no, provide a clear citation of law, regulation, standard, permit condition,
policy, or official guidance which caused the operation to now be out of conformity or out of compliance. (t.e_. SB 1217. Neuse NSW ;vies, se
Interagency Group guidance).
4. Has this operation expanded since May, 1992? Yes_ No X If yes, is the proposed treatment associated with this expansion? (Explain)
5. Describe problems and proposed treatment for which assistance is needed.
Lagoon closure planned to meet State mandated requirements.
I hereby apply for cost sharing assistance under the North Carolina Agriculture Cost Share Program. This application does not guarantee cost
share approval or obligate the applicant to enter into a cost share agreement.
Applicant
to 10 -10-ago
District Chair �� ��� _ Date 16- 17- o_ o _
Approved ✓ Denied
i '�

NC DENR NC-ACSP-2
DSWC
(12198)
NORTH CAROLINA
AGRICULTURE COST SHARE PROGRAM
COST SHARE AGREEMENT
This agreement is entered into -on this / 7 day of G44 2000, by and between the.
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District and
(Applicant) of
{Applicant} of
Mike & Sue Clayton, Landowners ,
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm (Landowner)of Rougemobt, NC 27572
(Landowner) of
hereinafter called "the cooperator(s)". This agreement for Contract No. 68-2001--05-09 _ covers
the period of practice installation up to, but not beyond, the first Wednesday in June 2-003 , and
includes all items pursuant to 15A NCAC 6E .0102 (g).
THE COOPERATOR(S) SHALL AGREE 1-0-
(1) Implement the best management practice(s) to the best of his/her ability in compliance with the
rules governing this cost share program and according to the attached Conservation Plan of
Operation (CPO), and will not begin installation until approval is given by the Division of Soil
and Water Conservation.
(2) Maintain and continue the cost shared best management practices on the attached CPO for the
minimum life set forth by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. If the cooperator(s)
fails to properly maintain or continue the cost shared practices for their intended use for the life
of the practice, the cooperator(s) shall be required to repair or reimplement the practice within
30 days (up to one calendar year for vegetative practices) or be required to repay the State of
North Carolina a pro -rated amount of the cost share payment as set forth in 15A NCAC 6E. if
the cooperator(s) abandons the current operation, and converts the use of the cost shared
practices or fails to maintain the practices properly, the cooperator(s) will be required to repay
to the State of North Carolina a pro -rated amount of the cost share payment(s) as set forth in
the rules governing this program.
(3) Soil test at least every two years on benefited acres for the duration of.the contract
maintenance period. Samples must be submitted to the NCDACS Agronomic Division (or other
acceptable testing facility) and the fertilizer application recommendations followed as closely as
reasonably and practically possible.
(4) As a condition for receiving cost share assistance for waste management systems, have the
waste material analyzed once every year to determine its nutrient content and if the waste is
land applied, to annually submit a soil test sample for analysis of the area of waste application;
and to apply the waste as close as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
fertilizer rates. If the cooperator(s) fails to have waste and soil analyzed within a prescribed
amount of time as specified by the District, the cooperator(s) will be required to repay to the
State of North Carolina a pro -rated amount of the cost share payment(s) as set forth in the rules
governing this program.

(5) Permit access by Soil and Water Conservation District, Division and Commission
representatives at reasonable times to provide technical assistance and to inspect the practices
during and after implementation for proper installation, maintenance and continuation.
(6) Require any person(s) to whom the benefited acres are transferred by sale, lease or other
means to sign a statement to maintain and continue the cost shared BMPs for the remaining life
of the practice as a condition of the transfer of ownership or control. The cooperator shall give
a copy of the agreement to the District. Failure of the cooperator(s) to secure such an
agreement will require the cooperator(s) to repay the State a pro -rated amount of the cost
share payment(s) as set forth in the rules governing this program.
(7) Repay the State a. pro -rated amount of the cost shared portion of equipment purchased under
this agreement that is sold or leased within the maintenance period and further agrees not to
use cost shared equipment as collateral.
THE DISTRICT SHALL AGREE TO:
(1) Provide technical assistance for the planning, design, implementation, maintenance, and
certification for all best management practices (cost shared and non cost shared) contained in
the attached conservation plan of operation.
(2) Following District certification that best management practices were properly installed and
implemented, provide to the designated cooperators(s) through the North Carolina Division of
Soil and Water Conservation up to 75% of the average cost for each approved best
management practice contained in the attached CPO, 100% for practices receiving incentive
payments. Payments will be contingent on prior approval by the Division's NP5 Section of the
CPO, any Revisions or Supplements, and Requests for Payment.
(Applicant) Date
(Signature)
(Applicant) Date
(Signature)
(Landowner) Date /0-/0-6'2o6o _
(Landowner) Date
(Signature)
District Chair
Date /o, 17 - 00
(Signature)

NC DENR
DSWC
NORTH CAROLINA
AGRICULTURE COST SHARE PROGRAM
CONSERVATION PLAN OF OPERATION (CPO)
NC-ACSP-11
(12/98)
NAME: �x��es rhers a y �.9P
ADDRESS:
avZ� AJC- .27S7.Z
AGREEMENT NUMBER
P
[fBM
TEM
NO.
TRACT/
FIELD
NO:
PLANNED
TREATMENT
EST.
AMOUNTS
(UNITS)
AVERAGE
COST
S
COST
SHARE
%
ESTIMATED COST SHARE AND TIME
SCHEDULE'BY PROGRAM YEAR (INCLUDE
OTHER COST SHARED FUNDING SOURCES)
PYZ4'a1 PY. PY
-7
T
q
- Ee n� v4 % i r r r 4 �iowr
l} 453 S7
_5I, Z90
�, �,sz�
��
I 75 s
2��&8
a DAIS
I o o $
�c
sew
75�o
,-LV Q_V-)
(p .°ICI
75 %
26q. 7-
Will be Q l,'e a
1
a
Technical Representative- _ _ _ Date /e -i/- .2zwLl

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
March 10, 2000
Mr. Mike Clayton
Gates Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemont, North Carolina 27572
Subject: Notice of violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Gates Poultry Farm
Facility 468-1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
On February 7, 2000, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted an inspection of the animal waste
lagoon at this facility. During the inspection a discharge
of wastes from the lagoon was observed at an estimated flow
of one gallon per minute. Additionally, Mr. Hunt observed
an additional discharge of wastes as a result of surface
runoff from the stock piled litter along the drive on the
path on the way into the operation. Samples were collected
from surface water flows from both of these discharges and
analysis reveal characteristics that are indicative of
animal wastes. .
The facility was issued a Certificate of Coverage
(COC) 5/21/99. The COC has multiple reporting requirements
that were not met and apply to the discharges observed on
February 7, 2000. These items are listed in Section III.
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Paragraph 6: Regional
Notification (items a.,d.,e. and g.). Therefore, for
failure to notify as required by the COC the facility is
in violation of those requirements.
EffM
1628 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1628
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

3
i COUNTY ORANGE
RIVER BASIN:
I
a
REPORTTO RRO Regional Office
i Other
1 COLLECTOR(S) ; HUNT
E
Estimated BOD Range:
i
-
I
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY ;
' ' r i BAR _ ZODO " 000
Chtry emisLaboratory Report / Water Quality Sj A. l 1
Was MPLE TYPE
MQ 1
Ej AMBIENT QA STREAM WASH1` Q�,EFF3cUERf L OFFICE
D'wa
COMPLIANCE. Ej CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE—'— 'INFLUENT
EMERGENCY � ESTUARY
1
Lab Number : YW0780
Date Received:
2/15/2000
Time Received:
1:45 PM
Received By
3G
Data Released
Date Reported:
2/28/2000
1 _Z,
Station Location: GATES POULTRY
Seed: Chlorinated_ Remarhr
l
Station g Date Begin (yy/mmldd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A. H, L
20000214 1 1 130D
BOD 310 m L
COD High 34D MFZL
COD Low 335 L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
Cobform: MF Total 31504 / IODmI
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 / IODmI
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
Residue: Tota15D0 m L
Volatile 505 msIL
Fixed 510 m L
Residue. Suspended 530 L
Volatile535 m L
Fixed 540 m L
H 403 units
Acidi to PH 4.5 436 m /L
Addivy to pli 8.3 435 m /L
AlkaM to pH 8.3415 ftWL
Alkali'to H 4.5 410 L
TOC 680 m L
Turbidi 76 NIU
Colifarm Total Tube '/ 10p mis
COMMENTS :
Chlorite 940 L
Chi a: Tri 32217 u L
Chl a: Corr 32209 uyZL
Phoophytit a 32213 u L
Color. Taste 80 cu.
Color. H 83 H= C.U.
Color. PH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 L
Fluorite 951 mglL
Formaldeh de 71880 L
Grease and Oils 556 L
Hardness Total900 m L
S 'fic Conti 95 umhos/Cm2
MBAS 39260 m L
Phenols 32730 u L
Sulfate 945 m /L
Sulfide 745 mglL
Boron
Tannin & Lignin u L
Hexavalent Chromium u L
X
NH3 as N 610
740
uWL
R
TKN an N 625
900
m
L
•
NO2 plus NO3 as N 6M
0.03
MyL
R
P: Total as P 665
85
L
X
PO4 as P 70507
79
m
L
P: Dissolved as P 666
L
K-Potassium
L
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u
L
Cr-Chron ium:Toml 1034
u
L
Cu- Copper 1042
ugfL
Nit -Nickell 1067
us/L
Pb- Lead 1051
ujVL
Zn- Zinc 1092
u
L
V-Vanadium
u
L
A Silver 1077
u
L
'Ai- Aluminum 1105
u
L
Be Ilium 1012
u
L
Ca- Calcium 916
L
Co- Cobalt 1037
L
Fa Imn 1045
u
L
.CampositrT;S,�
SampleTyp'eq
r
lS
Li -Lithium 1132• " L
M -liairKsitim427 ` L
M.-Mgx.oeseU9,L
Na-Soffl& 429 m L
Arsenic- )Lai ID02 U110i
Sr Selenium 1147 u L
H M 71900 u L
Ba_Badum ujVL
rine Pesticides
Organoplaosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
BawJNeuual&lcidExuactable nks
TPII Diesel Range
k Orpmcs (VOA bottle mMp
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BM Gasoline RanF
PhMplankton

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGCMGNT W�'i"iA��1LIUJFI�jtUkh: W(1)M1)
COUNTY— PRIORITY SAMPLE: TYPE
R1VIAi BASIN pjLUS F— ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑ STREAM EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO aRO WIIlO WSRO TS
AT BM
❑
Other COMPLIANCEXCHAIN 1.AISE ❑ INFLUENT
— _ OF CUSTODY
Fnr I.ab fine ONLY
Lab Number O
Date Received: Ime:
Rec'd b From: Bus-Courler and bet
DATA ENTRY Y: CK:
Shipped by: Bus Courler lafl ther ❑EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTORIS): ..Jrp}ij 0 U JT—
T STATION LOCATION: GArs COuLT¢�y_
Estimated DOD Range: 0 5/5 25/25-65/40 130 or IOp plus /� -
Seed: Yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes[]No0' REMARKS: fjULT!:M GA6cjrJ g17r-L,-1E !=
Station #)' Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin I Date End Time End Depth DM DO D13M Value Type nTpo,
eite Sample T
1 - :O� OL I;:as >]� `� t+ ��, lS A H L S B C� GNXX
:]
1
BODS 310 mg/1
2
COD f ligh 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Colllorm: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
9
Residue: Total Six) mg/l
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue; Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pit 403 units
�15
Acidity to prll 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pil 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pli 8.3 415 mg/1
18
Alkalinity to pll 4.5 410 mg/I
TOC 680 mg/1
.191
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color.(pH 183 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 1119/1
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Ilardness Total 900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
/
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 my1
P. Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 7050 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmlunt 1027 ugA
CrChromlum.Total1034 USA
Cu-Copper 1042 u9/1
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zu-Zinc 1092 ug/i
Ag 1' I�ver 1077 ug/I
Ai -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-CalClllm 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mgt -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodium 929 mg/i
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosplrorus Pesticides
Acid Ilerbicldes
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Temperanne la
D_O,
Alkatinity
Acidity
Air Temperature ICI
Sampling Point X
Conduclance at 25 C
Water
mg/1
prll
p f 18.3 prl 14.5
pl l 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
31M)
Cloud Cover X
4fq .
8224_4 _ 431
_
82243 182242 _
_
20
Salinity X
I'reclpitlon On/day)
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAI eon Stream Depth It.
Stream Width It.
480
45
32
36
1351
I350
35 64
4
.�j

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report I Waler Quality
SAMPI_p TYpF
COVNtri'
ORANGE
J!IUQg1L1
RIVER BASIN :
AMBIENT QA
STREAM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO
RRO- Regiorml Olfioe
COMPLIANCE a C11AIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
-
X❑ EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTORS) :
JOI(N HUNT
Lab Number :
YW 1232
Date Received:
3/3/2000
Time Remved :
2:50 AM
Received By
JG
Data Release :
AR
Date Reported:
3/10/2000
Estimated BOD Range: Station Lotaltoa: MIKE CLAYTON FARM POND
seed: Chlorinated: N Remarks:
Station N Dale Begin ("Immfdd) Date End (yylmmldd) Time Begin Time Fad Depth - DM, DB, DBM Yalae Type - A, fl, I, ��H�T, S, B SampEe Type
CLAYiON5 FARM 03/03/00 t3:00
BOD3t0 m L
COD High 340 m L
COD Low 335 L '
X
Coliform MF Feral31616 13 000 /100ml
Csliform: MF Total 31 RH / 100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 / 100m1
Catiform: Fecal Surp 31673 /Iwm1
Residue; Total 500 L
Volatile 505 M L
Fused 510 /L
Residue: Sus 530 m L
Volatile 535 L
Fixed 540 mg1L
If 403 units
Acidity to pI4 4.5 436 m L
Acidity to EH 83 435 m /L
Alkalinlry to pH 8.3 415 m L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m L
TOC 680 m&IL
Turbidity 76 MU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 MIS
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940
m
L
Chi a: Tri 32217
u
L
Chi a: Corr 32209
u
L
Pheophytin a 32213
u
L
Colas True 80
C.U.
Color. H) 83 pHa
C.U.
Color. H 7.6 82
C.U.
Cyanide 720
L
Fluoride 951
m
L
Formaldeh de71830
mjKL
Grease and Oils 556
m
L
Hardness Total90D
mel-
SpeciftCond.95
umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260
m
L
Phenols 32730
u
1-
Sulfatc945
m
L
Sulfide 745
L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin
u
L
Hexavalent Chromium
u
L
�}� RCG'iUr+� OffICE
X
NH3 asN610
110
L
X
TKN an N 625
140
L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
-00.01
aWL
X
P: Total as P 665
11
L
PO4 as P 70507
aWL
P: Dissmlved as P 666
L
K-Potassium
m
L
Cd. Cadmium 1027
u
L
Cr-Chromium Total 1034
u
L
Cu- Copper 1042
u
L
Ni-Nickd 1067
u
L
Pb. Lead 1051
uFZL
Zn- Zinc 1092
u
L
IV -Vanadium
u
L
A-Silvcr 1077
u
L
Al- Aluminum 1105
u
L
Be- Beryllavin 1012
u
L
Ca- Calcium 916
L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u
L
Fe- butt 1045
u
L
Li -Lithium 1132 u L
Mt Magnesium 927 nWL
Mn-Manganew 1055 u L
Na. Sodium 929 m L
Arsave:Tora11002 u L
Se. Selenium 1147 u L
H - Mercury 71900 us/L
Sa_Barium u L
urine Pesfxides
Or no hat horns Pesticides
Add Herbicides
Base/Nnttral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPII Diesel Ranke
Pu bee 'm (VOA bouie 'd
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phytopiankwn

V
For Lab Use ONLY
UiV1S1UI U1 EIVVIHlUNT1ENfAA. MANAGEMENT WATER Q AINI�r"
�#
ORm 11UM1)
rllJJ!'
_COUNTY _DRA0C.
PRIORITY
SAiRP 'S E19�/ U,
P"' rBAS[N t1 Fr
❑AMBIENT
❑
❑ STREAM
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MROQ!�,WORD WIRO WSRO TS
EFFLUENT
AT BM
❑C
CHAIN
❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
1
Other -- - -
MPLIANCE
OF CUSTODY
EMERGENCY
❑ ESTUARY
Shipped by: Bus Coutl taf Other
Lab Number: Nu�t�
Date Recelve a:b Time + Je
Rec'd b From: Bus-Courle and
DATA ENT Y: CK:
` DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTORM: P — U r4 )-+ L1 t.t—
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/$-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: M , J:� Ct~ 4.0 fo .3 Fag-&,
Seed: Yes ❑ No I-] Chlorinated. Yes El No REMARKS: _j
Station # c
CL_i-,i � wi ( ```
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Beginj
Q� b 3 O 13 —ft
Date End I
-M e3 3
Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type
12=30 A H L
Composite
T S B
Sample Type
C � GNXX
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
- 13
i4
15
16
17
18
19
20
BODS 310 mg/1
`
Chloride 940 mg/I
NH3 as.N 610 m9/1
Li -Lithium 1132
COD High 340 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
TKN as N 625 mg/1
Mg-Magnesfum 927
COD Low 335 mg/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 maA
Mn-Manganese 1055
ollform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
P� Total as P 665 mg/I
Na-Sodium 929
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /looml
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
Arsenlc:Total 1002
Conform: Tube Fecal 31615 /loom]
ColoF.(pH ) 83 ADMI
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
Se -Selenium 1147
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Color. pH 7.6 82 ADM[
Fig -Mercury 71900
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
Cyanide 720 mg/]
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Volatile 505 mg/l
Fluoride 951. mg/I
Cr-Chromlum:Tota11034 "9A
Organoph R*0rusPesticides
Fixed 510 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Acid Herbicides
Volatile 535 mg/f
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Fixed 540 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
Zn-Zfnc 1092 ug/I
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
pH 403 units
MBAS 38260� mg/f
Acid Extractable Organics
Acidity to pil 4.5 436 mg/I
Phenals 32730 ug/I
Ag- liver 1077 ugA
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/f
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle re:
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Alkalinity to Fill 4.5 410 mg/l
Ca-Calclum 916 mg/l
TOC 680 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Turbidity 76 NTU
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/1
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature tQ
D.O. mg/l
Fill
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pit 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400
SU44 43I
82243 182242
20
Salinity X
Precipitlon On/day)
Cloud Cover X
Wind Direction 07eg1
Stream flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/1t
Mean Stream Depth It.
Stream Width it
480
45
32
136
11351
1350
135
64
4
e
DMI/Revlsed 10/86

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Facility Number
Farm Name: e s W4:)T ices Prk -
On -Site Representative: 4A kL-F= _cLr+y rz a
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: ,2. Ljod
Date of site visit: S z7
FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
_L'-�OP eration is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure o
Part It eligibility item(s) F1 F2 3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: YZz-6 pounds
-c: F• �� �t�a3 ��� �T)
Irrigation System(s) - circle #hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wrrpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number (_h_-__�___
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER' Z
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES.
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
14 LA
1(4.
2., 3
11,3
2 , G
A4Z-,
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBERZ - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
L.-X

DI V ISION_OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
SAMPI F TYPE
COUNTY ORANGE
PRIQRITY
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT QA
STREAM
0 EFFLUENT
REPORT TO RRO Regional Olrice
COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
Ej INFLUENT
Other
X❑ EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : JOHN HURT
Lab Number
YW1233
Date Received :
3/3/2000
"lime Received:
2:50 AM
Received By
JG
Data Released :
AR
Date Repotted :
3/10/2000
Estimated SOD Range: Station Location: MIKE CLAY -TON FARM
Seed: Chlorinated: N Remarks:
Station 0 Date Begin (yy/mmldd) Date End ()ry/mmldd) Time Benin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A. H. L Composite-T. S, B Sample Type
CIAYTON FARM 03/03/00 1 13:00
BOD 310 mg/L__
COD High 340 m /L
COD Low 335 m L
Colifotm MF Foal 31616 /100md
Coliform MF Total 31504 / 100tn1
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 / 100m1
Colifomt: Fee.1 SM 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 L
Volatile 505 m L
Fixed 510 L
Residue: S 530 rngJ L
volatile $35 m L
Fixed 540 m L
H 403 units
Acidity to off 4.5 436 mV L
Acidiry to pH 8.3 435 m L
Alkahnirrto pH 8.3 415 m L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m L
TOC 690 m L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Colirorm Total Tube 1/100 MIS
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940
L
Chi a: Tri 32217
u
L
Chi a: Corr 32209
u
L
Pheophypn a 32213
u
L
Color. True 80
e.u.
Color H 83 PH=
C.U.
Color. PH 7.6 82
c.u.
Cyanide 720
mg1L
Fluoride 951
m
L
Fomtaldeh de7[380
L
Grease and Oils 556
m
L
Hardness Total900
m
L
Specific Cond. 95
umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260
ftWL
Phenols 32730
u
L
Sulfate945
m
L
Sulfide 745
L
Boron
Tannin &Li 'n
u
L
Hexavalem Chromium
u
L
MAR 2�"
DEF+tw." Rfil F'u.� RMONAL OFFICE
% I
NH3 as N 610
20
oWL
X
TKN an N 625
37
aWL
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
a0.01
L
X
P: Total as P 665
1.9
zWL
PO4 as P 70507
P: Dissolved as P 666
K-Potassium
ML
C& C Admium 1027
u
L
Cr-Chromium ToW 1034
L
Cu. Copper 1042
u
L
Ni_Nidcd 1067
u
L
Pb- Lead i0i
u
L
7n- Zinc l092
u
L
V-Vanadium
u
L
A -Silver 1077
u
L
Al -Aluminum 1103
u
L
Be- PnMum 1012
u
L
Ca- Calcium 916
ML
co- Coball1037
u
L
Fe- Iron 1045
u
L
Li -Lithium 1132 ulVL
M Magnesium 927 m L
Mn-Manpriese 1055 u L
Na- Sodium 929 mVL
ArserticToW11002 u L
Se -Selenium 1147 u L
H - Mercury 71900 u L
Ba_Ratium u L
Organtichlorine Pesticides
OWnopficigphorm Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Basc/Naval"cidExtractableOr .
TPH Diesel Range
Pu nits(VOA bottle 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Ph W*ton

gg ��yy % sa � I *' p t� o
DIVISION OF ENVIHONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WAVE 0I8ALITY FIEfD-LAB FORM (DM1)
For Lab Use ONLY
Number:
l
COUNTY C29,pvrS GC- PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
Lab
-3-oo C1
j R"" BASIN t i�[tS
❑AMBIENT ❑
❑STREAM
Date Recelved
Tlme .S
{ REPORT TO.- ARO FRO MR RR WaRO WIRO WSRO TS Qp
EFI7UENT
Rcc'd b ;
From: Bus Court - and
AT BM
❑COMPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN
❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
j Other
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
--- OF CUSTODY
❑ESTUARY
REPORTED:
Shipped by: Bus Courier, �ta I3:pthen EMERGENCY
DATE
I�
} COLLECTOR(S): Jtl1n1 fkUr>'r_
1[ STATION LOCATION: M . %E
Lt-ik �tTb"� �AQI'�
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No El Chlorinated: Yes❑ NoiiEMARKS:
Station #
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM
Value Type
Composite
T pe
C—L0.`(Tb-f r%�QM
�0 �7 rij
1�=8�
tx� p3 .
I
i3=3o
A H
L T S
B
C G GNXX
1
BOD5 310 mg/I
COD High 340 mg/I
2
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Colllorm: MF Fecal 31616 /t00ml
5
Colilorm: MF Total 31504 /100m1
6
Colllorm: Tube Fecal 31615 /IOOml
7
Collform.- Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/l
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to p" 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 milli
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
ChI a: Tri 32217 oil/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/i
Color- True 8o Pt -Co
Cofor:(pH ) 83 ADM[
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM[
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 95I mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/em2
MBAS 38260 milli
Phenois 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/1
ZI
NII3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/i
N 2 plus NO3 as N 630 rngA
N Total as P 665 mg/l
PO4 as P 70507 mgn
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/l
Cr-ChromiurmTotal1034 ug/I
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/l
ZrrZlnc 1092 ugA
Ag liver 1077 ug/l
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/i
Ca-Caltium 916 mOA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/i
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
LI-Lithium 1132
Mg-Magneslum 927
Mn-Manganese 1055
Na-Sodium 929
Arsenic -Total I002
Se-Selenlum 1147
Hg-Mercury 71900
Organochlorine Pesticides
Onymophosphorua Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides
II Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
r IAcld Extractable Organics
I I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle re,
fPhytoplankton
Sampling Point SL
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature 10
D.O. mg/I
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
FAA 8,3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pit 8.3
2
94
to
300 •
400 a
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity R
Precipltion (in/day)
Cloud Cover R
Wind Direction (Deg}
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H I
4ean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
145 132
136
1 1351
1350
135
64
14
DMI/Revised 10/86

i
INV"
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
. RALEIGH REGIONAL, OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 25, 1999
Mr. Mike Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemount, North Carolina 27572
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Facility #68-1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
On May 27, 1999, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted
a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management
Regulations. During that inspection Mr. Hunt notified you that the lagoon freeboard
was inadequate and a subsequent Notice of Violation was issued June 17, 1999.
Inadequate freeboard is a violation of General Condition V. No-3 of the permit issued
May 21, 1999 for your facility. Mr. Hunt instructed you that the lagoon freeboard must
be lowered to a minimum of seven inches below the original crest of the spill way in
order to obtain the minimum freeboard to meet compliance with the State's Animal
Waste Management Regulations. Mr. Hunt informed you that another inspection was
necessary within the next thirty days to verify that the lagoon was lowered to the
acceptable level.
The lagoon was reinspected on June 17, and June 21, 1999. The lagoon did not
have sufficient freeboard as required for animal liquid waste systems. Liquid waste
systems are required to maintain an emergency freeboard plus additional capacity for
collection and storage of the equivalent for a 25 year - 24 hour storm. Your lagoon is
constructed with an emergency spill way thus the emergency freeboard is not mandatory
for this structure, but there was not sufficient freeboard to contain the required storm
storage of approximately six and a half inches. During the inspection of June 21, the
freeboard was measured with a level and determined that the liquid elevation of the
lagoon was higher than the crest of the original spill way. However, because soil had
been added in the spill way the liquid was contained within the lagoon.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 278o9
PRONE 919-871-4700 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RKCYCLED/10% POOT-CONBUMER PAPER
+- L'c� Fs.. I

Page 2
Mr. Mike Clayton
The above matter should be addressed to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. This office is considering
recommending an enforcement aciton for the referenced violation.
Please respond to this Notice within 10 days of receipt. You
should include in your response the actions that you will take to
address this deficiency. If you have justification that the'
violation was caused by events or circumstances beyond your
control please address those factors in your response letter.
Your response will be reviewed and forwarded to the Division
Director for his consideration. In the absence of such
justificatton, we will proceed with the enforcement action
recommendation.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this matter
please call at [phone].
Sincere ,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Mr. Brent Bogue , Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

11V .
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
June 25, 1999
Mr. Mike Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemount, North Carolina 27572
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Facility #68-1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
On May 27, 1999, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted
a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's .Animal Waste Management
Regulations. During that inspection Mr. Hunt notified you that the lagoon freeboard
was inadequate and a subsequent Notice of Violation was issued June 17, 1999.
Inadequate freeboard is a violation of General Condition V. No.3 of the permit issued
May 21, 1999 for your facility. Mr. Hunt instructed you that the lagoon freeboard must
be lowered to a minimum of seven inches below the original crest of the spill way in
order to obtain the minimum freeboard to meet compliance with the State's Animal
Waste Management Regulations. Mr. Hunt informed you that another inspection was
necessary within the next thirty days to verify that the Iagoon was lowered to the
acceptable level.
The lagoon was reinspected on June 17, and June 21, 1999. The lagoon did not
have sufficient freeboard as required for animal liquid waste systems. Liquid waste
systems are required to maintain an emergency freeboard plus additional capacity for
collection and storage of the equivalent for a 25 year - 24 hour storm. Your lagoon is
constructed with an emergency spill way thus the emergency freeboard is not mandatory
for this structure, but there was not sufficient freeboard to contain the required storm
storage of approximately six and a half inches. During the inspection of June 21, the
freeboard was measured with a level and determined that the liquid elevation of the
lagoon was higher than the crest of the original spill way. However, because soil had
been added in the spill way the liquid was contained within the lagoon.
8800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONESIS-871-4700 FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEO/10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Mr. Mike Clayton
The above matter should be addressed to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. This office is considering
recommending an enforcement aciton for the referenced violation.
Please respond to this Notice within 10 days of receipt. You
should include in your response the actions that you will take to
address this deficiency. If you have justification that the
violation was caused by events or circumstances beyond your
control please address those factors in your response letter.
Your response will be reviewed and forwarded to the Division
Director for his consideration. In the absence of such
justificaiton, we will proceed with the enforcement action
recommendation.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this matter
please call at [phone].
Sincere ,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Mr. Brent Bogue , Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

wo NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
March 10, 2000
Mr. Mike Clayton
Gates Poultry Farm
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemont, North Carolina 27572
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Gates Poultry Farm
Facility #68-1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
On February 7, 2000, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted an inspection of the animal waste
lagoon at this facility..During the inspection a discharge
of wastes from the lagoon was observed at an estimated flow
of one gallon per minute. Additionally, Mr. Hunt observed
an additional discharge of wastes as a result of surface
runoff from the stock piled litter along the drive on the
path on the way into the operation.Samples were collected
from surface water flows from bath of these discharges and
analysis reveal characteristics that are indicative of
animal wastes. .
The facility was issued a Certificate of Coverage
(COC) 5/21/99. The COC has multiple reporting requirements
that were not met and apply to the discharges observed on
February 7, 2000. These items are listed in Section III.
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Paragraph 6: Regional
Notification (items a.,d.,e. and g.). Therefore, for
failure to notify as required by the COC the facility is
in violation of those requirements.
1628 MAIL SIRV ICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-16211
PHONE [phone] FA% 919-S7t-4716
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50`Yp RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

a
Mr. Mike Clayton
Page 2
On February 14, 2000 Mr. Hunt again inspected the farm
and observed a discharge of wastes from the lagoon. Once
again a sample of the liquids indicates that this as a
pollutant with characteristics indicative of animal wastes.
On March 3, 2000 Mr. Hunt conducted a follow up
inspection and observed a discharge of wastes into a small
pond within a pasture that serves as a portion of the waste
application spray fields. It appeared that all of the fish
in the pond and many in the stream below the pond had been
killed as a result of the spill. Samples were collected
that are indicative that the pond was inundated with what
a pollutant with characteristics of animal wastes.
The violations resulting in discharges to waters of
the State are subject to civil penalties of up to
$25,000.00 per day per violation
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering
recommending an enforcement action against you for the
above violations. You must respond to this Notice within
fourteen days of receipt. You should include in your
response.the actions that you have taken and will take to
address these violations. The Raleigh Regional Office
appreciates your cooperation with this matter. If you have
any questions please call at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional supervisor
cc: Orange County Health Department
Mr. Brent Bogue, Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

C 0 x 8 L R v A S l o r
Orange Soil & Water PO Box 8181
Conservation District Hillsborough, NC 27278
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE: October 30, 2000
TO: Jahn Hunt
Division of Water Quality
FAX NO.: (919) 5 71-*A0F , 7/3
FROM: ORANGE SWCD -- Gail Hughes
FAX #: [phone]
This transmission consists of 2 wages including
cover sheet.
CANTS: s r.�li
MikefLke, 0 41�,_-. 792-e40AS�
WtP t 4cJao awy o)Z�u
-L
Z0/10 'bd W33 vs� 09N,VH0 6991 U1 616 11890:11 00/60/11

SOIL &WATER
CONS ERc<..ION
Orange Soil and Water Consenatlon District
306 Revere Raad a P.O. Box 8181
Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Phone: [phone] • En 2750
Fax: [phone]
TO: John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Gail Hughes
Soil Conservationist
Orange SWCD
RE: Closure Plan for Crates Brothers Poultry Farm
DATE: October 30, 2000
Mike and Sue Clayton, operators of Crates Brothers Poultry Farm began working with our
office on a closure plan immediately after the meeting with the Attorney Generals office
in June
NRCS CET, Tommy Burchette and Daphne Canner, Division of Soil Water engineer
Staff member, have been assisting us with survey and Closure recommendations,
The Clayton's have requested financial assistance from the N,C. Agriculture Cost Share
Program. The request was approved by the local Soil & 'Water Conservation District
Board and will be evaluated by the NCACSP technical review committee_
The Clayton's have gotten estimates for closure of the lagoon. There are very few private
contractors that haul waste in this area. The Clayton's understand they must begin
removal of the liquid waste through irrigation before the solids can be removed_
Currently, the irrigation waste utilization plan that was planned for the lagoon originally
is suitable. The waste will be sampled once solids are agitated and a revision will be
made to the WUP_ if needed.
We will continue to monitor the closure process and update you periodically.
If you should have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at
[phone],
Gail M, Hughes
HIM 'Bd W33 dSd 39NUNO 699t UZ 616 WEZ0:11 00/60/11

S OIL & WATER
USDA
C o o S a R V A S I 0 N
Orange Soil & Water
Conservation District
Phone: [phone], Ext. 2750
11 /27/2000
TO: John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Phone: [phone], Ext. 3
FROM: Gail Hughes xS U,4d
Soil Conservationist
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
RE: Lagoon Closure Plan for Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
PO Box 8181
306 Revere Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
2000
Brent Bogus
.District Conservationist
USDA-NRCS
The Orange Soil and Water Conservation District (District) and the USDA -Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) staff. began working with Mike and Sue Clayton, owners and
operators of. Gates Brothers Poultry Farm, on a lagoon closure plan in early June.
In June, the Clayton's requested and received approval from the local technical staff to extend
the waste application pumping schedule until the second week in July. There had been
several days of rain, and the extension allowed the Clayton's to reduce the liquid levels in the
lagoon.
The local NRCS and District staff, along with the NRCS and Division of Soil and Water
technical engineering staff evaluated the lagoon and have made the following
recommendations for closure. The staff members will continue to monitor progress until
closure of the lagoon is completed.
• Estimated amount of liquid volume (based on original designs) for irrigation is 4,453,575
gallons.
Estimated volume of solid waste to be excavated and broadcast is 1,484,524 gallons.
(25% of total volume) This estimate may be adjusted once liquid volume is decreased and
the solids are visible.
Clayton's will follow their existing waste utilization plan for irrigation. (50.3 wettable acres
available)
-As solids become visible, Clayton's will begin to agitate the solids, incorporating solids
with liquids and continue to irrigate waste. .
Waste samples will be taken as solids'are incorporated into the liquid. The waste
utilization plan will be up -dated, as needed by the technical staff.
Solids that can not be irrigated will be sampled and a waste utilization plan will be written
for this material that will be broadcast.

Solids will be excavated from lagoon and broadcast onto grassland on the farm. (58 acres
are available).
The Clayton's have decided to flatten the entire embankment (rather than breaching one
section), seed the area in grass, therefore, being able to mow and maintain the area as
pasture.
After completion of closure, staff will certify closure of the lagoon and notify the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) staff.
The Claytons have begun the closure process by irrigation of the liquid waste. Staff members
will continue to monitor liquid levels throughout the winter months. Progress of the closure
will be determined by weather conditions.
Staff members will continue to update DWQ staff with progress of the closure. If you have
any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Brent Bogue or Gail Hughes
at 919-245-2750.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] May 4 '00 14:25
P. C1
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone; [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
May 4, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME:
Mr. John Hunt
COMPANY:
DENR Raleigh Regional Office
FAX:
571-4718
PHONE:
571-4700
PAGES:
3 (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
RE:
Gates Eros. Poultry Farm
If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify us by telephone and returrx the original amssage
by return wail at the above address.
FROM: Philip A. Telfer, Special Deputy Attorney General
MESSAGE: Lagoon Clpsure St=dards

WE ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
May 4 '00 14:25 P.02
STATE Of NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel.
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney
General and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN,
Secretary, North Carolina Department of
Environment, and Natural
Resources,
Plaintiff,
MIKE CLAYTON d/b/a GATES
BROTHERS POULTRY 1~ARIM
Defendant.
IN THE GENFRAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
00 CVS 257
CONSENT ORDER
This matter came on for hearing before the Court upon the motion of the State of North
Carolina for a Preliminary Injunction and the Consent Order ezitered by the Court on April- 10,
2000. The parties have notified the Court that they have agreed, as evidenced by the signatures
of their counsel below, to extend the Temporary Restraining Order previously entered in this
matter and to set a hearing on the State's motion for Preliminary Injunction for the term
beginning May 30, 2000, subject to the following terms:
1. The Defendant, by consent to the. entry of this Order, does not waive any defense
he might have to the entry of the Preliminary Injunction requested by the State.
2. The State reserves the right to petition the covet for f other relief prior to May 30,
2000 hearing should a change in conditions at the Gates Poultry Farm make such further relief
necessary for the protection of health or the environment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Temporary Restraining Order entered by the
Court on February 28, 2000 shall remain in effect until dissolved by further order of the Court.

Ni RTTY 6EN CONS PROT Fax'.9197166050 May 4 '00 14:25 P.03
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on the State's Motion for Preliminary
Injunction shall be held in the Superior Court for Orange County in Hillsborough, North
Carolina, on the 30th day of May, 2000, at 10-00 a. ran., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be
heard.
This the th day of May, 2000.
CONSENT:
For Piaintiff State of North Carolina:
Philip A. Telfer
Special Deputy Attorney General
E
Superior Court Judge Presiding
For Defendant Mike Clayton d/b/a/ Gates
Poultry Farm;
Ronnie P. King
Ronnie P_ King, P. A.

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
May 4 '00 16:25 P.01
.f
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer protection
P.O. Box 620
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
May 4, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME:
Mr. John Hunt
COMPANY:
DENR Raleigh Regional Office
FAX:
571-4718
PHONE:
571.-4700
PAGES:
3 (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
RE:
Gates Bros. Poultry Farm
If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify us by telephone and return the original message
by rtturn mail at the above address.
FROM: Philip A. Telfer, Special Deputy Attorney General
MESSAGE: Lagoon Closure Standards

NC PTTY GEN CONS PRAT Fax:[phone]
May 4 '00 16:25
05'/04/2000 10:09 SIS-715-6048 DWO NON bISGHARGE SR
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATIO SERVICE
CONSERVATION PRACTICE STAN ARD
IIITERIM STANDARD
for
CLOSURE OF ABANDONED WASTE TREATI yT LAGOONS
ALXD
WASTE STORAGE FONDS
(No.)
Code 998
P. 02
PAGE 02
DErVfITION - .
Spillways
The safe removal imd trcatmcat of ex4tin9 waste
Ali abandonc
lagaaas or waste =rage pow
from Waste Trmrment lAtoons anA Wastie
that arc not b
hed or MM th= have an
Storage pOads that are no longer in use for tlLOir
emb&nlnntnt
3 fe:,t cr more, sW have a
mtznde.d purpose.
principal Spill
ay arA4 an emergency spMwxy
insLakled Lk at
Lrs the requirements of
I'L> POS1
Conservation
ractice Staadsrd 379 (Ponds).
7= purpose ofthis ee,=m;ion prattles is to
Eseavated Pi
protect the quality of suf ce %-4ter and
groundv�r�r resoure=s and m safeguard the
-teavatesl
Forexcavated
ill chat were p evsously ustd fray
Public health.
waste trcattn
lag000s or wa= 5tomge ponds
that are to be
ased all reasaaable cffvrts must ,
C On'DITIaNS 1'VRE $R,�►CTIC�
be made to
rnsteeial5. If
tc and rcm❑vc all waste
bottom ofthe lagooulstmcrire
APpLxES
is about tlu
er table a= tha time of cicsurt dad
Tl�s praotics applies to animal Waste TrC=M;
Will support
moving equipmeor, it must be
Lagoons and Wash Storage ponds that are no
scrapexi. A g
ed tacbtuCXI specialist must
longer used for their o6rinal inr=ded purpose.
determine the
ii stabiliiv for cxTh srwviag
trump m, F
lagoons/strucm that are nor-w
CRI�A
be sped au
cse with bottorm docatnt atcd to
be below the
ter table at the tithe of dour¢,
Objective
tb,c depth of-
'=cd" w2= mmierial rentaiaing
Tom", Objective is to tc movc N 2= .Tatensls to the
in the 1ag0oo/
tills= at the C=e of tlosure =y
Mz.%iM.=m c;drat pra=,mble,aom a
not txce-d a
Y.rm ti depth of =Tc died onc
laizooWs4ucture prior to clamure.
(1) f❑❑t,
Watcr Quality Testing
The waste
will be analyzed and applied to
No sD ial water quality testivg wW be required.
Crops at w9v
c rum based on R=Oistc Yield
Ella a lon
'10 for nitrogen (N).
Removal of Inflow DeAces
Once all sludg
is rem the' o,vmcr bz the
All dtvices used to convey ani nnl waste into Tte
option of using
rtructure as a frmh water
lagoon or storage pond shall be removed.
pond, or the p
amy be filled
rl- r tioe pmcticc uArw:ards art reviewed 9esig.40Lty, and upcbtad if f1Ct To obtain tlgt ct,r�,j� version
x I uthis ru %dnrd me= G'� coalcwuri® { RcWurces ConMtiO4 Sdr-^m
COMPULr- File 999. too tiinclo.Ncoorrsn�een�rivt
MACS. Nc
JA:C1rARY. 199'

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] May 4 '00 16:26 P.03
f aS/04/2800 919-715-6@48
DWp NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 03
10:09
988.2
Embankment Structures CONSIDE TJONS
If a ia.S000/structurz is to be brcachet� the liquid "ne proper oval cf organics arad nutrients and
MUST be Ftunped au; arld the r=nainirtg waste prrvcutica of Ilutant dischaxge3 to surface
material scraptd, ?LwDnabie efforts must be warers is the onsibilaty of the Owner.
made w remove all wrast^, materials prior So
closure_ PLANS AND- PECIFICATIONS
For lgcon/strucrures not to be brm.ched,
Plans and Spec; cauans for closure of ab=&rled
reasonable efforts must be made to agimte and
waste Vcgmeq lagoons and waste Storage ponds
rt:move Ail w ter let Ala. if the bottom ofthe
shall be is kcc g with this sm-itdard and i4&U
lagoon/structure4above the water tablt: at the
describe the r irr_ments for.4ptyinS the
,
time of cl=rc and will support earth moving
prsctice to achi a irs misruled purpose,
cquipmen; It roust be scraped_ A gua"ed
tethai� specialist Inum d�rnzine the soil
If the waste t ent lagoat} or wa=ta storage
stabUlty for earth movinsv equipmcut. For
pond being con rttd to a freVi Water pored is
latigrrotLs/stiuetures that arc not to be Scraped and
required to m Conservation Practic- S4adard
those with bottoms documented to he below the
a71(ponds), th pl=s =4 speciEcatigns will
'water mbIa a= �e time of closure, the depth of
also be in keep' with tm Mquirements of rhat
.'agttatzd" waste "teriai regaining is the
P=dard.
Ingoonlstrucrurc at the time of closure may not
exceed a maximum depth of more them one (1)
OPERATION MANTENANCE.
fool.
A properly deep ssioned tvaste treAtment
The vm= wmee wiu be a,iialyzed and applied to
lagoon or waste omgc pond should squire little
crops ar agronomic rates based on Rwlistic Yield
or no overauon M"JAftnauce, however, if it
Expectxt on (RY.E.) for nitm-4ca (N),
has been ccnve to auother use, ,such as a
fresh water A operation and 3tra wnailcc wi11
If intended for use as a fresh water pond. the
be in accordance tb the needs as set foct>t iu
Conservation P 'ca Staadud 378 (Ponds).
requiremmis under "Spillways" section of this
srAndard shall be met.
Tb4 WWw%km nt may be:
1) breub4d 6o that it will no longer ttnparnd
liquid, or 2) be Idt iabwt and allowed to U with
fresh water for use As a Vuh water pond.
Ifthc ernbankmant is breuhtd, the slopes nand
bottom of the breech shall be stable for the soil
mawrial involved, 6ut th= side slopes shall be no
steeper dirt 3:1.
Vc�etntion
All disturbed arcs shall be YMta.ted in
accordance with Tet;hrdcal Guide Standard 342,
Critical Area TreatmCM
NABS. NC
JANUARY. 1997

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jun 19 ' 00 17 : 32 P. 01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
May 4, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME:
Mr. John Hunt
Mr. Ken Scheuster
COMPANY:
DENR, Raleigh Regional Office
FAX:
571-4718
PHONE:
571-4700
PAGES:
9 (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
RE: 1
Gates Bros. Poultry Farm/Consent Judgment
It your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify us by telephone and return the original message
by return Mail at the above address.
FROK Philip A. Telfer, Special Deputy Attorney General
MESSAGE: For your review and comment. Sorry for the defy.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jun 19 '00 17:32 P.02
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA., ex rel.
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney
General and ex rel.,'BILL HOLMAN,
Secretary, North Carolina Department of
Environment, and Natural
Resources,
Plaintiff,
MIKE CLAYTON d/b/a GATES
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM
Defendant
IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
00 CVS 0257
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, State of North Carolina ("State") and Defendant, Mike Clayton, hereby agree to
the entry of this Consent Judgment in order to resolve the matters in controversy between the
parties, The parties agree that this Consent Judgment may be signed out of county, out of session
and out of district.
The State brought this action to compel the Defendant to comply with the State's water
quality laws, administrative rules and Defendant's certified animal waste management planof the
Gates Poultry Farm (" 1; arm"). Pursuant to a Temporary Restraining Order issued by the Court,
the Defendant depopulated the Farm and took other actions to bring the Farrn into compliance.
In support of the Consent Judgment, the parties agree to and the Court makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff is the sovereign State of North Carolina. This action was brought on the
relation of Bill Holman, Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(hereinafter referred to as "D,ENR"), the State agency which has authority to enforce the State's

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jun 19 '00 17:32 P.03
environmental pollution laws, including laws enacted to protect the water quality of the State.
This action, was also being brought on the relation of Michael F. Easley who, in his capacity as
Attorney General, is vested with the common law power to bring civil actions to abate public
nuisances-
2. The defendant, Mike Clayton, is the owner and operator of a poultry growing
farm operation known as the Farm which is located on State Road 1524, also known as Holly
Ridge Road, near the intersection of State Road l 524 and State Highway 57 in Orange County,
North Carolina.
3. The Superior Court has jurisdiction of this action and that Orange County is a
proper venue.
4, Pursuant to its statutory authority, the EMC has developed a Poultry Waste
Operation General Permit for poultry operations (the "General Permit"). Defendant has applied .
for and obtained a Certificate of Coverage under the General Permit and is covered by its terms.
5. Defendant, pursuant to the applicable statute and rules, has obtained a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan ("CAWMFwhich is incorporated by reference into the
General Permit.
6. The State, in its Complaint, alleged numerous violations of the State's
environmental laws and regulations, in particular Chapter 143 of the General Statutes and the
regulations regarding animal wastes management systems codified in Subchapter 214,0200 of
Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (the "non -discharge rules"), and of the
CAWMP for the Fam.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jun 19 '00 17:33 P.04
7. The Defendant, in his Answer, admitted that some violations of the statutes,
regulations, General Permit and CAWMP have occurred at the Farm, including failure to
maintain adequate freeboard and discharges of animal waste to the waters of the State.
$. The dam for the lagoon at the Farm has are emergency spillway which allows
animal waste and wastewater to flow from the lagoon before it overtops. Because of the
spillway, the CAWMP for the Farm establishes the maximum liquid level in the lagoon to be two
(2) feet below the top of the dam_
9. As a result of the Temporary Restraining Order issued in this matter, which has
been extended by Consent and remains in effect as of the entry of this Consent Judgment, the �
Farm has been depopulated. The Defendant has agreed to close thand has agreed to do so
in accordance with _ ("NRCS") standards, a copy of which is attached
hereto as "Exhibit V and is incorporated by reference. Defendant acknowledges that he has been
informed that other similar lagoon closures have cost approximately $60,000 and that there is no
way of knowing at this time the costs he will incur in closing the lagoon.
10. The Defendant has requested that any civil penalties which may be assessed by
the State for the violations alleged in the Complaint be included in this Consent Judgment. The
parties have agreed tkiat the Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources a civil penalty of $5000 in accordance with, the schedule set out below. In assessing
this penalty, the Director of the Division' of Water Quality has relied on financial records
provided by the Defendant and the cost of rectifying the damage by permanent closure of the
lagoon. Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions for closure or payment of
the $5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall be
3

... _ . k CIA • Z)l hr IUOUDU Jun 19 '00 17:33 P. 05
$50,000 and become immediately due and payable. The'State may collect such penalty by filing
a Motion -in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 150E of 'the General Statutes or to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G.S. 143B-282.1(c).
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
10. Defendant has violated the State's water quality laws and administrative rules, its
CAWMP and General Permit.
11. The State is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.
12. ,During the pendenacy of the closure, the Defendant must comply with the
provisions of the state's environrnental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAWMP,
AGREEMENT
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Parties agree that:
11. In consultation v,rith a representative of the Orange Soil and Water Conservation
Service, they have developed the following time line for closure of the lagoon:
a. Defendant shall submit, within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Consent
Judgment, for approval by the Division of Water Quality in DENR a plan
for lagoon closure certified by the Orange County Soil and Water
Conservation. Service. Such plan shall provide for proper closure of the
lagoon within eighteen (18) months of the entry of this Consent Judgment-
b. Upon approval of the flan by the Division of Water Quality, Defendant
shall fully implement the certified closure plan within the time forme
,provided in the plan. In implementing the plan, the Defendant shall
consult with the Orange.County Soil and Water Conservation Service.
4

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jun 19 '00 17:33 P.06
c, Should Defendant, despite diligent good faith efforts to implement the
certified closure plan,, require extensions of time to complete lagoon
closure, the Defendant shad provide the basis for such extensions to the
the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service, If the the
Orange Count of Water Conservation Service agrees that such
extension is wafrented, i will recommend such extension to the Division
5� of Water Qua shall determine if the extension is warranted. If
Defendant disagrees with a decision regarding an extension of time, it
may seek a review of such decision by filing a motion in the cause.
d, In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water Quality in
implementing the certified closure plan, John Hunt, inspector for the
Division of Water Quality in the Raleigh Regional Office of the
Department of Evnironnnent and Natural Resources, is designated the
single contact for the Department for purposes of this Consent Judgment.
The Department may designate a different contact by notifying counsel for
the Defendant.
12. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources a
civil penalty of $5000 in accordance with the following schedule: $1000 on or before December
31, 2000; $1500 on or before December 31, 2001; and $2000 on or before December 31, 2002,
should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions for closure or payment of the
$5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed sball be $50,000
and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such penalty by filing a
Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes or 'to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G,S. 143B-282.1(c).
13. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for violations alleged in
the Complaint only. The parties recognize that any violations not known to the State at the time
of this Consent Judgment or committed after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcement provided to the State by statute or common law_
5

NC RTTY GON CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jun 19 ' 00 17 :33 P. O7
Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
A. In consultation with a representative of the Orange Soil and Water Conservation.
Service, the Defendant shall implement the following time line for closure of the lagoon:
l . Defendant shall submit, within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Consent
Judgment, for approval by the Division of Water Quality in •DENR a plant
for lagoon closure certified ("Plan'') by the Orange County Soil and Water
Conservation Service. The Plan shall provide for groper closure of the
lagoon within eighteen (1 S) months of the entry of'this Consent Judgment.
1 Upon approval of the Plan by the Division, of Water Quality, Defendant
shall fully implement the Plan within the time frames provided in the plan.
In implementing the Plan, the Defendant shall consult as necessary with
the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service,
3. Should Defendant, despite diligent good faith efforts to implement the
Plan, require extensions of time to complete lagoon closure, the Defendant
shall provide the basis for such extensions to the Orange County Soil and
Water Conservation Service. If the Orange County Soil and Water
Conservation Service agrees that such extension is necessary, it shall
recommend such Extension to the Division of Water Quality which shall
determine if the extension is warranted. if Defendant disagrees with a
decision regarding an extension of time, it may seek a review of such.
decision by filing a motion in the cause_
4. In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water, Quality in
implementing the Plan, John Hunt, inspector for 'the Division of Water
Quality in the Raleigh Regional Office of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, is designated as the single contact - for the
Department. The Department may designate a different contact by
notifying counsel for the Defendant.
B. During the pendency of the closure, the Defendant shall comply with the
provisions of the State's environmental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAWMP.
0

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Pax:9197156050
Jun 19 '00 17:34 P.08
C. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources a
civil penalty of $5000 in accordance with the following schedule: $1000 on or before December
31, 2000; $1500 on or befQre December 31, 2001; and $2000 on or before December 31, 2002.
Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions of the Plan or for the payment of
the $5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall be
$50,000 and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such penalty by filing
a Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the perxalty
pursuant to G.S. 1435-282.1(c).
13. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for violations alleged in
the Complaint. The parties recognize that any violations not known to the State at the time of
this Consent Judgment or committed after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcement provided to the State by statute or common law.
This the day of
We consent:
Mike Clayton, Defendant
2000, at —. m.
Hon.
Superior Court Judge
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
VA

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jun 19 '00 17:34 P.09
Ronnie P, King
ROWE P. KING, P.A.
,Attorney for Defrridant
DepaMnent of Environment and Natural Resources
Philip A. Telfer
Special Deputy Attorney General
North Carolina Department of Justice

NC PTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jul 12 '00 12:08 P.01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile.: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
July 12, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME.
Mr. John Hunt
COMPANY:
DENR, Raleigh Regional Office
FAX:
671-4718
PHONE:
571-4700
PAGES:
12 (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
RE:
Gates Bros. Poultry Farm/Consent Judgment
If your receipt or this transmission iS in error, please notify us by telephone and return the origirmJ message
by return sail at the above address.
FROM: Philip A_ Telfer, Special Deputy Attorney General.
MESSAGE:

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Jul 12 '00 12:08
P. 02
Sta
te of North CarolIna
Department of Justice
P O. Box 6�9
MICHAEL P. EASLEY RAl E(GH
ATTORNEY GENERAL 27602-0629
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis Ramsey, Ken Scheuster, John Hunt, Dan Oakley
& Grayson Kelley
FROM_ Phil Telfer'�4
RE: State v. Mike Clayton dNa Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
00 CVS 0257, Orange County
DATE: July 12, 2000
CONSUMER PROTECTION
919•7 1 6.6600
Fax: [phone]
Attached is copy of the Consent Judgment in the above -captioned matter
which was signed by Judge Balog on July 10, 2000. John Hunt is
designated as the State contact. John, please note the deadlines in the
agreement and keep me posted on what you receive,
Please let me know if you have any questions.
E

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
.Jul 12 ' 00 12 : 08 P. 03
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
IN THE.GENEr Z-AL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
00 CVS 0257
STAVE OF NORTI-i CAROUNA, ex rel. }
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney )
General and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN, j
Secretary, North Carolina Department of }
Environment, and Natural )
Resources, )
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, }
)
MIKE CLAYTON d/b/a GATES )
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM )
Defendant. }
Plaintiff, State of North Carolina ("State") and Defendant; Mike Clayton,, hereby agree to
tht entry of this Consent Judgment in order to resolve the matters in controversy between the
parties. The parties agree that this Consent Judgment may be signed out of county, out of session
and out of district.
The State brouabt this action to compel the Defendant to comply with the State's water
quality laws, administrative rules and Defendant's certified animal waste management plant at the
Oates Poultry Farm ("Fau="). Pursuani,t to a Te:mporaxy Restxaix iDg Orden issued by the Court,
the Defendant depopulated tthe Farrri and took other actions to bring the Farm into compliance.
In support of the Consent Judgment, the panics agree to and the Court makes the following:
FINDINGS OF l ;ACT
1. Plaintiff is the sovereign State of North Carolina, This action was brought on the
relation of Bill Holman, Secrezzn� of the Depa=eni of Environment and Natural Resources
(hcreinaftcr rcfcrrcd 10 as "DENR"), rnrc Sian aocncv which has auihority io criforce ir�c 5zaic'5

NC RTTY GEN CONS PRET Fax:[phone]
Jul 12 '00 12:09 P.04
environmental pollution laws, including laws enacted to protect the water quality of the State.
This action was also being brought on the relation of Michael F. Easley wbo, in his capacity as
Attorney General, is vested with the common law power to bring civil actions to abate public
2. The defendant, Mike Clayton, is the owner and operator of a poultry growing
farm operation known as the Farm which is located on State Road 3 524, also known as Holly,
Ridge Road, near the intersection of State Road 1524 and State Highway 57 irx Oza.rkge County,
North Carolina.
3. The Superior Court has jurisdiction of this action and that Orange County is a
proper venue.
Q. Pursuant to its statutory authority, the EMC has developed a Poultry Waste
Operation General Permit for poultry operations (the "General Permit"). Defendant has applied
for and obtained a Certificate of Coverage under the General Permit and is covered by its terms.
S_ Defendant, pursuant to the applicable statute and rules, has obtained a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan ("CAWMP") which is incorporated by reference into the
General Permit.
6. The Statc, in its Complaint, alleged numerous violations of the StatCs
environmental laws and regulations, in particular Chapter 14S of the General Statutes and the
regulations regarding animal wastes management systems codified in Subchapter 2H.0200 of
Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (the "non -discharge rules"}, and of the
CAWMP for the Farm.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jul 12 '00 12:09 P.05
7, The Defendant, in his Answer, admitted that some violations of the statutes,
regulations, General Permit and CAWMP have occurred at the Farm, including failure to
maintain adequate freeboard and discharges of animal waste to the waters of the State.
$, The CAWM? for the Farm establishes the maximum liquid level in the lagoon to
be two (2) feet below the top of the dam,
9. As a result of the Temporazy Restraining Order issued in this matter, which has
been extended by Consent and remains in effect a, of the entry of this Consent Judgment, the
Farm has been depopulated. The Defendant has agreed to close the Farm and has agreed to do so
in accordance with Natural Resources Conservation Service ("NRCS") standards, a copy of
which is attached hereto as "Exhibit 1" azd is incorporated by reference. Defendant
acknowledges that he has been informed that other similar lagoon closures have cost
approximately $60,000 and that there is no way of knowing at this time the costs he will incur in
closing the lagoon.
10. The Defendant has requested that any civil penalties which may be assessed by
the State for the violations alleged in the Complain: be included in this Consent Judgment. The
parties have agreed that the Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources a civil penalty of $5000 in accordance with the schedule se# out below. in assessing
this penalty, the Director of the Division of Water Quality bas relied on fat=cial records
provided by the Defendant and the cost of rectifying the damage by pe=anent closure of the
lagoon. Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with. the provisions for closure or payment of
the $5,000 penalty, as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall be
S50,000 and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such penalty by fling

NC RTTY GEN CCNS PPDT Fax:[phone]
Jul 12 '00 12:09 P.06
a Motion in the Cause in this .matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 1 SOB of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G.S. 143B-282.1(c).
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
11. Defendant has violated the State's water quality laws and administrative rules, its
CAVv7a and General permit.
12. The State is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.
13. During the pendenacy of the closure, the Defendant must comply with the
provisions of the State's environmental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAWMP.
AGREEMENT
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Parties agree that:
14. In consultation with a representative of the Orange Soil anal Water Conservationu
Service, they have developed the following time line for closure of the lagoon:
a. Defendant shall submit, within ninety (90) days of the entry of this
Consent Judgment, for approval by the Division of Water Quality in
DENR a plan for lagoon closure certified by the Orange County Soil and
Water Conservation Service. Such plan skull provide for proper closure of
the lagoon within ei-hteen (1 S) months of the entry of this Consent
Judgment-
b. Upon approval of the Plan by the Division of Water Quality, Defendant
shall fully implement the certified closure plan within the time frame
provided in the plan. In implementing the plan, the Defendant shall
consult with, the Orange County Soil and Water.Conservation Service,
c. Should Def=dant, despite diligent good faith efforts to implement the
certified closure plan, require extensions of time to complete lagoon
0

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jul 12 '00 12:10 P.07
closure, the Defendant shall provide the basis for such extensions to the
the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service. If the the
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service agrees that such
extension is warrented, it will recommend such extension to the Division
of 'Water Quality which shall determine if the extension is warranted. If
Defendant disagrees with a decision regarding an extension of time, -it
may seek a review of such decision by filing a motion in the cause.
d. In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water Quality in
implementing the . certified closure. plan, John Hunt, inspector for the
Division of Water Quality in the Raleigh Regional Office of the
Department of Bvrl ronment and Natural Resources, is designated the
single contact for the Department for purposes of this Consent Judgment.
The Department may designate a different contact by' notifying counsel for
the Defendant.
15. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources a
civil penalty of $5000 in accordance with the following schedule: S1000 on or -before December
31, 2000; $1500 on or before December 31, 2001; and S2500 on or before December 31, 2002.
Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions for closure or payment of the
$5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall be $50,000
and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such penalty by filing a
Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G.S. 143P-282.1(c).
I b. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for violations alleged in
the Complaint only. The Parties recognize that any violations not known to the State at the time
of this Consent Judgment or committed after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcement provided to the State by statute or common law.
Based on the forenoina, it is ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
E

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT F=ax:9197166050 .Jul 12 '00 12:10 P.08
A. Defendant shad not repopulate the Gates Poultry Farm for a period of five (5)
years from the entry of this Consent Judgment. If Defendant decides to operate a poultry
operation after that time, Defendant shall notify DBNR and -the Attorney General's Office before
engaging in such operation and shall obtain all necessary permit for such operation.
B. In consultation with a repzesentative of the Orange Soil and Water Conservation
Service, the Defendant shall implement the following time line 'for closure of the lagoon.
I.. Defendant shall submit, withizt ninety (90) days of the entry of this
Consent Judgment, for approval by the Division of Water Quality in
D1NR a plant for lagoon closure certified ("Plan") by the Orange County
Soil and Water Conservation Service. The Plan, shall provide for proper
closure of the lagoon within eighteen (18) months of the entry of this
Consent Judgrxtent.
2. Upon approval of the plan by the Division of Water Quality, Defendant
shall fully implement the Plan within the time frames provided in the plan.
In implementing the Plan, the Defendant shall consult as necessary with
the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service.
3. Should Defendant, despite diligent good faith efforts to implement the
Plan, require extensions' of time to complete lagoon closure, the Defendant
shall provide the basis for such extensions to the Orange County Soil and
Water Conservation Service. If the Orange County Soil and Water
Conservation Service agrees that such extension is necessary, it shall
reco=end such extension to the Division of Water Quality which shall
determine if the extension is warranted_ if Defendant disagrees with a
decision regarding an extension of time, it may seek a review of such
decision by filing a motiozl in the cause.
4. In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water Quality in
implementing the Plan, John Hunt, inspector for the Division of Water
Quality in the Raleigh Regional Office of the Department of Environmeztt
and Natural Resources, is designated as the single contact for the
Departmcrit. The Department may designate a different contact by
notifying counsel for the Defendant.
C

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]C Jul 12 '00 12:10 P.09
C. .During the Pendency of the closure, the Defendant shall comply with the
provisions of the State's environmental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAWMP. Nothing in this Consent Judgment shall be deemed to prohibit amendment of the
CAWMP in compliance with all applicable statutes and rules.
D. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources a
civil penalty of $5000, without interest, in accordance with the following schedule: $1000 on or
before December 31, 2000; $1500 on or before December 31, 2001, and $2500 on or before
December 31, 2001- Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions of the Plan
or for the payment of the $3,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judprnent, tic penalty
assessed shall be $50,000 and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such
penalty by filing a Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to
contest the penalty pursuant to Chapter 150T3 of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the
penalty pursuant to G.S. 143B-282.1(c).
F. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for -6olations alleged in
the Complaint. The Parties recognize that any violations not known to the State at the time of
this Consent Judgment or committed after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcement provided to the State by statute or common law,
4'
This the /a day of G�w f„_ , 2000, at
Hon Steve A. Balog
Superior Court Judge
7

NC RTTY GEN CONS PRET Fax:[phone]
Jul 12 '00 12:10 P.10
We consent:
Mike Clayton, De ndant
Ronnie P. King
RONNIlr P. KING, PEA,.
Attorney for Defendant
c r T. Stevens, Direc r
ivision of Wate'r-Qu6lity
epartment of Environmrmt and Natural Resources
Philip A. ffelfeT
Special Deputy Attorney General
North Carolizia Department of Justice
9
0

12 '00 12�11 P.11
NC RTTY GEN CONS PROi Fax:[phone] Jul F-XH1RiT
o
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVIC"Z
CONSERVATION PRACTICE STAvbAR.D
-INTERIM STANDARD
for
CLOSURE OF "ANDONEI? WASTE TREATIMENT' LAGOONS
AND
WASTE STORAGE ?OILS
(No.)
Code 998
DEFL\= O N
Tne sm a rrrnovzl and wm=enr of Misr g u+asz=
from W=c Trc.-L=nt Lagoorzs and Wa=
Sromge Ponds il= = na loag=r in use for tbrir
izar:ad:,d purpose,
PURPOSE
Ta purpose of:his cons=mlicm pracica is to
Prot:= the quziiry of sur:a= .zzd
pa ndvsratrs maut= and to safeguard the
pubLr..heo,l:h-
CONDMONS «'IiFRz. PRACTICE
42YLIES
"Ths prm=-= uppLrz to aalmJ Wane Trcatm-,:m
Lagovrss aad'Vast. 5tn�e p=a s that are ao
ions trr Apr ilXC3T griilYi� iAtrrtidC� putpos'--,
Qbj rvdve
Th! Qbje=:i is TO TMov` lva.5—.- :.tc� is to tot
rr.Yimum eTuftzi pracb ble Bona a
laQOanJsrurs prior to closure.
Waicr Quality TGS�A�
Nil spcc:al wzs„ euaiiry==S tip] be rcquin�i
Rzmovai of Inflow 1)v6res
All dvviamz ustd to conve•v ammnr west: into the
L7'Pon Or stomse Pond z9all be rz nvvai.
Spi)3ways
All 2baudonati lagaous or m.= swrage ponds
tsar ar mt br=-h d or Ocd ibx nave as
er;lbanJ�a3z afS tom: or store, shall have �
primipai spillway and as emerg=cy spMvmy
installed th:a m=s ;be reautrme= of
CArAwyz4on P:a 6ce Studi -d 779 cpon&).
F wvAtcd Pits
For csmnmd OU :hat west. ppevionsly ustd far
-ism ttma=ett lagoom or vast; sta,t-age ponds
'chat ark to be cl=z:d aL re_ s bL-- ecru zsz
be made to ag'= ate nmiam aU uam
matuiais. Tithe bottom ofi� lago�misr~-s�azz
is above the ar� table as ttar t;�nt Of CiG=C amd
will support earth aso` =E tq=mm it =Lm be
scrawl A gxtaUed tschm'f3) smiaii atus
determine zhc sail srabilirr for pia waving
cquitmt- For Izgoorz/smcwm th= am not to
be s—*—aoed and those with bouorns dociir a edl to
be below t4u wat-s =ble at :!-- tzae of closure,
the depth of .azci" wasz• mx=m , mma4zi���ng
io the lagomwmcr zte ar :1-- =uc ai closurt may
not axc:�el a UUr-v=Wn depth of morn =ran o=
{I} faot
The wa= v z= vM be aualv=d and applied to
crops at ap=orrx c ratm tmcd or, F=Usric Y54d
xp=ua cm (R,Y1.) for nitrag= D;)-
On= an shtdg: is rcmDvt::� tnc own, r hau: the-
aptiora of uSrrg the ntr3=m 4 a � rsa �skr
pond, or the pis ma,v br• fine�l
} cans: alion pg-%Wiiec mv.•Lzrw Wv revir—*d y, aW v¢+ L" it "NAer- 66LAin 0-
• �r J'u r��✓ti �RV.C. {IM !J aura{ jy�o.,•aa Ce�.�-+.- �o.. S.,-.+�..
cmmpv�. Clk,: yyf,Cp�-vil�sa�.Rrlwperrt Z7ZYiti
.tirACE. }1C
JF.IrJNCY. 299"

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Jul 12 '00 12:11 P.12
993-2
Eml anlcment Structure
If lagoon/structure is to be breached, az liquid
muc.be pined but SrLd She rMlait11ag W=
z=m-kil scmVe:d. RwoaWC tf'orts mm be
mule to ret urve all %v=e =Izrials prior Io
CIO$=,
For hgooxVrwunturw not to lac brc=&d.
rms=ble efforts must be made to agltatc az?d
rcnwvc all w,= materials. Sf the bosom of the
lago=IstsuMre is abovyc tht'wattr rabic at tT z
time of closure and will support t2zth rriovia3
egttipm=t, it mum be scrapers A quallfird
MChai=1 speCiZU71 must detcrrninc tiu sal!
;wry for Barth nuwing aquipmmr- For
LVaoas/stn ch= zbat am zwt to be sczapcd and
ibm with b=ems docuzn=% d m be b4ow for
wa2wi bIc az the time of closure, tht depth z;f
w,.0 ruttrial rcnoai,ning is tc
lagocrrlstruct= at the time of closure my not
exee*d a mm 6mutn depth of room ttmn mv, (1)
foar-
The tit=w=,er,.VM be aaah,:Pcd .gadapplW is
truss at av*caotaic ears based = Realistic Yield
Lvom6on CELY-E.) formit (gyp.
If insmded for use as a fah vw•= pone], the
of LL S
surd shall be met.
Tbz tmbar>�x = =y be:
1) brmche i:0 that u W1 nn lossg= impound
liquid, or 2) be let Bathe sad allowed w fill with
fry tit =r fi�r Lsc m a &sb, watir p o:ad.
If tic =banitrnm= �s bmabzd, Uit, siv9z and
bauom oft4c breach shall be stable far the =
involved, but tbz Sidi, 51opm Ina be no
st=r_r ter 3:1.
V bttai�pri
Au disturbed arms Shall be vtZ*wsd in
acrrda =c with T=huical Cure Standard �4.:,
Crtuml Arm Ttmrmmt.
CONSZDERATIONS
the proper t^emavai Df orgarks and nuzrieets and
PrCV=d0C ofgollutar;t dischu'ges to surface
wamrs is the respo=hwry ofzhe owner.
PLANS AND SPECUICATIONS
P!2= and spec4=tiozu for closure of abanduncd
wasu zrtarmcaz lagoons and,Kelso zu rage panels
shall be in kerpirtg with dus standard axud shall
scribe the requireme= for applymE the
pr net to achir rc its ir►uadetl p¢rpoSC.
If tht w`4.5tt trcatmtaat iagvorr or %wam, storage
paod being wavmed to n frwh water porrd is
rquixtd to Mee Cft5=%z6= Practice Srs"'jard
372 (Ponds), the pIv= sad saccjE=:jom will
aiso be in xCeping with the rcquir meets of that
standard.
OPTION &UND A��ANC'E
A properly derarmrdmsi=zd vmste txe==t
14M Cr *Utc storage paced should require Utdc
ar rzo opt-atitxa sad saainze�t+; bawCvtrr, u i1
lou b= roavcrttd to artad= use, such as a
fr-mh wazes pond, op=tiau and ztzt iatrasurcr vr
be is er-,-ordancc with the mwds as se: forth im
Coascrvatioa Practica St xd 378 (Panels).
MACS. NC

NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
EIViRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
NEW MAILING ADDRESS:
Raleigh Regional Office
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
PHYSICAL LOCATEON not a
mailing oddress)
3800 Barrett Drive, Pm 101
Raleigh, NG 27609
Voice: 919/571-4-700
FAX: 919/5 i �-4-7
PLEASE NOTE o U R NEW
MAILING ADDRESSlII
7-0: QI� k L L�f Q— FAX:-7 l_L Y� oS
FROM:
SUBJECT: C-L4�' '-Vwj "'R27NN DATE: 9z- .
MESSAGE;:
* Pages including cover sheet
�7-V.:O ZL�A
Sft
I , i
AlexvC.n

b Yt
C 0 K a a a v# S t O"
Orange Soil & Water PO Box 8181
Conservation District Hillsborough, NC 27278
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE:
TO: V ,0, lw 4,V-r
FAX NO. 9 f 9 ` 6- 7/ ` -11-71g
MOM: ORANGE SWCD --
FAX #: [phone]
This transmission consists of �3 pages including
cover sheet.
COMMENTS:
,,J—O�-14)
cy s /sum All—
t7
y
t x. ad
D
Ala/10 'Bd W33 910119<-- U5d 30NU30 6991 FU 616 "10:90 00/90/Zi

S OIL &i WATER
C a i s R v A S I 0!
Orange Soil & Water
Conservation District
Phone: 9%-732-a181, Ext. 2750
11/27/2000
TO: John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Phone: [phone], Ext. 3
FROM: Gail Hughes
Soil Conserva Pionitst
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
RE: Lagoon Closure Plan for Gates Brothers Poultry rarm
USDA
PO Box 8181
306 Reverse Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Brent Bogue P
District Conservationist
USDA-NRCS
The Orange Soil and Water Conservation District (District) and the USDA -Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) staff began working with Mike and Sue Clayton, owners and
operators of Gates Brothers Poultry Farm, on a lagoon closure plan in early June.
In June, the Clayton's requested and received approval from the local technical staff to extend
the waste application pumping schedule until the second week in July. There had been
several days of rain, and the extension allowed the Clayton's to reduce the liquid levels in the
lagoon.
The local NRCS and District staff, along with the NRCS and Division of Soil and Water
technical engineering staff evaluated the lagoon and have made the following
recommendations for closure. The staff members will continue to monitor progress until
closure of the lagoon is completed.
Estimated amount of liquid volume (based on original designs) for irrigation is 4,453,575
gallons.
Estimated volume of solid waste to be excavated and broadcast is 1,484,524 gallons_
(25% of total volume) This estimate may be adjusted once liquid volume is decreased and
the solids are visible.
Clayton's will follow their existing waste utilization plan for irrigation. (50.3 wettable acres
available)
As solids become visible, Clayton's will begin to agitate the solids, incorporating solids
with liquids and continue to irrigate waste.
Waste samples will be taken as solids are incorporated into the liquid. The waste
utilization plan will be updated, as needed by the technical staff.
Solids that can not be irrigated will be sampled and a waste utilization plan will be written
for this material that will be broadcast.
£0/H 'sd W33 asd HMO 699E M 616 WdZ0:90 00/90/ZI

Solids will be excavated from lagoon and broadcast onto grassland on the farm. (58 acres
are available).
The Clayton's have decided to flatten the entire embankment (rather than breaching one
section), seed the area in grass, therefore, being able to mow and maintain the area as
pasture.
After completion of closure, staff will certify closure of the lagoon and notify the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) staff.
The Glaytons have begun the closure process by irrigation of the liquid waste. Staff members
will continue to monitor liquid levels throughout the winter months. Progress of the closure
will be determined by weather conditions.
Staff members will continue to up -date DWQ staff with progress of the closure. If you have
any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Brent Bogue or Gail Hughes
at 919.245-2750.
N/20 'sd 03 8I17lL9<-- dsd 350110 699E ZFL 616 mdZO:SO oaigoLZl

State of North Carolina
Department of Justice
P. O. Box 629
MICHAEL P. EASLEY RALEIGH
ATTORNEY GENERAL 27602-0629
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis Ramsey,t! e Sche tsu er, John Hunt, Dan Oakley
& Grayson Kelley
FROM: Phil Telfer 11
RE: State v. Mike Clayton d/b/a Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
00 CVS 0257, Orange County
DATE: July 12, 2000
CONSUMER PROTECTION
919.71 6-6000
Fax: [phone]
Attached is copy of the Consent Judgment in the above -captioned matter
which was signed by Judge Balog on July 10, 2000. John Hunt is
designated as the State.contact. John, please note the deadlines in the
agreement and keep me posted on what you receive.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
COUNTY OF ORANGE 00 CVS 0257
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. }
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney.
General and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN, )
Secretary, North Carolina Department of }
Environment, and Natural )
Resources, }
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, )
MIKE CLAYTON d/b/a GATES )
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM
Defendant. )
Plaintiff, State of North Carolina ("State") and Defendant, Mike Clayton, hereby agree to
the entry of this Consent Judgment in order to resolve the matters in controversy between the
parties. The parties agree that this Consent Judgment may be signed out of county, out of session
and out of district.
The State brought this action to compel the Defendant to comply with the State's water
duality laws; administrative rules and Defendant's certified animal waste management plan at the
Gates Poultry Farm ("Farm"). Pursuant to a Temporary Restraining Order issued by the Court,
the Defendant depopulated the Farm and took other actions to bring the Farm into compliance.
In support of the Consent Judgment. the parties agree to and the Court makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff is the sovereign State of North Carolina. This action was brought on the
relation of Bill Holman, Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(hereinafter referred to as "DENR°:), the State agency which has authority to enforce the State-s

environmental pollution laws, including laws enacted to protect the water quality of the State.
This action was also being brought on the relation of Michael F. Easley who, in his capacity as
Attorney General, is vested with the common law power to bring civil actions to abate public
nuisances.
2. The defendant, Mike Clayton, is the owner and operator of a poultry growing
farm operation known as the Farm which is located on State Road 1524, also known as Holly
Ridge Road, near the intersection of State Road 1524 and State Highway 57 in Orange County,
North Carolina.
3. The Superior Court has jurisdiction of this action and that Orange County is a
proper venue.
4. Pursuant to its statutory authority, the EMC has developed a Poultry Waste
Operation General Permit for poultry operations (the "General Permit"). Defendant has applied
for and obtained a Certificate of Coverage under the General Permit and is covered by its terms.
5. Defendant, pursuant to the applicable statute and rules, has obtained a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan ("CAWMP") which is incorporated by reference into the
General Permit.
6. The State, in its Complaint, alleged numerous violations of the State's
environmental laws and regulations, in particular Chapter 143 of the General Statutes and the
regulations regarding animal wastes management systems codified in Subchapter 2H.0200 of
Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (the "non -discharge rules"), and of the
CAWMP for the Farm.

7. The Defendant, in his Answer, admitted that some violations of the statutes,
regulations, General Permit and CAWMP have occurred at the Farm, including failure to
maintain adequate freeboard and discharges of animal waste to the waters of the State.
S. The CAWMP for the Farm establishes the maximum liquid level in the lagoon to
be two (2) feet below the top of the dam.
9. As a result of the Temporary Restraining Order issued in this matter, which has
been extended by Consent and ,remains in effect as of the entry of this Consent Judgment, the
Farm has been depopulated. The Defendant has agreed to close the Farm and has agreed to do so
in accordance with Natural Resources Conservation Service ("NRCS") standards, a copy of
which is attached hereto as "Exhibit 1" and is incorporated by reference. Defendant
acknowledges that he has been informed that other similar lagoon closures have cost
approximately $60,000 and that there is no way of knowing at this time the costs he will incur in
closing the lagoon.
10. The Defendant has requested that any civil penalties which may be assessed by
the State for the violations alleged in the Complaint be included 'in this Consent Judgment. The
parties have agreed that the Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources a civil penalty of $5000 in accordance with the schedule set out below. In assessing
this penalty, the Director of the Division of Water Quality has relied on financial records
provided by the Defendant and the cost of rectifying the damage by permanent closure of the
lagoon. Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions for closure or payment of
the $5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall be
$50.000 and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such penalty by filing

a Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G.S. 143B-282.1(c).
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
11. Defendant has violated the State's water duality laws and administrative rules, its
CAWMP and General Permit.
12. The State is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.
13. During the pendenacy of the closure, the Defendant must comply with the
provisions of the State's environmental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAVE MP.
AGREEMENT
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Parties agree that:
14. In consultation with a representative of the Orange Soil and Water Conservation
Service, they have developed the following time line for closure of the lagoon:
a. Defendant shall submit, within ninety (90) days of the entry of this
Consent Judgment, for approval by the Division of Water Quality in
DENR a plan for lagoon closure certified by the Orange County Soil and
Water Conservation Service. Such plan shall provide for proper closure of
the ,lagoon within eighteen (18) months of the entry of this Consent
Judgment.
b. Upon approval of the Plan by the Division of Water Quality, Defendant
shall fully implement the certified closure plan within the time frame
provided in the plan. In implementing the plan, the Defendant shall
consult with the Orange County Soil and Water.Conservation Service.
C. Should Defendant, despite diligent good faith efforts to implement the
certified closure plan, require extensions of time to complete lagoon
El

closure, the Defendant shall provide the basis for such extensions to the
the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service. If the the
Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service agrees that such
extension is warrented, it will recommend such extension to the Division
of Water Quality which shall determine if the extension is warranted. If
Defendant disagrees with a decision regarding an extension of time, it
may seek a review of such decision by filing a motion in the cause.
d. In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water Quality in
implementing the certified closure plan, John Hunt, inspector for the
Division of Water Quality in the Raleigh Regional Office of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, is designated the
single contact for the Department for purposes of this Consent Judgment.
The Department may designate a different contact by notifying counsel for
the Defendant.
15. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources a
civil penalty of $5000 in accordance with the following schedule: $1000 on or before December
31, 2000; $1500 on or before December 31, 2001; and $2500 on or before December 31, 2002.
Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions for closure or payment of the
$5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty assessed shall be $50,000
and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such penalty by filing a
Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to contest the
penalty pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the penalty
pursuant to G.S. 14313-282.1(c).
16. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for violations alleged in
the Complaint only. The Parties recognize that any violations not known to the State at the time
of this Consent Judgment or committed after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcement provided to the State by statute or common law.
Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
5

A. Defendant shall not repopulate the Gates Poultry Farm for a period of five (5)
years from the entry of this Consent Judgment. If Defendant decides to operate a poultry
operation after that time, Defendant shall notify DENR and the Attorney General's Office before
engaging in such operation and shall obtain all necessary permit for such operation.
B. In consultation with a representative of the Orange Soil and Water Conservation
Service, the Defendant shall implement the following time line for closure of the lagoon:
Defendant shall submit, within ninety (90) days of the entry of this
Consent Judgment, for approval by the Division of Water Quality in
DENR a plan for lagoon closure certified ("Plan") by the Orange County
Soil and Water Conservation Service. The Plan shall provide for proper
closure of the lagoon within eighteen (18) months of the entry of this
Consent Judgment.
2. Upon approval of the Plan by the Division of Water Quality, Defendant
shall fully implement the Plan within the time frames provided in the plan.
In implementing the Plan, the Defendant shall consult as necessary with
the Orange County Soil and Water Conservation Service.
�. Should Defendant, despite diligent good faith efforts to implement the
Plan, require extensions of time to complete lagoon closure, the Defendant
shall provide the basis for such extensions to the Orange. County Soil and
Water Conservation Service. If the Orange County Soil and Water
Conservation Service agrees that such extension is necessary, it shall
recommend such extension to the Division of Water Quality which shall
determine if the extension is warranted. If Defendant disagrees with a
decision regarding an extension of time, it may seek a review of such
decision by filing a motion in the cause.
4. In order to facilitate contact with the Division of Water Quality in
implementing the Plan, John Hunt, inspector for the Division of Water
Quality in the Raleigh Regional Office of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, is designated as the single contact for the
Department. The Department may designate a different contact by
notifying counsel for the Defendant.
0

C. During the pendency of the closure, the Defendant shall comply with the
provisions of the State's environmental statutes and regulations, the General Permit and the
CAWMP. 'Nothing in this Consent Judgment shall be deemed to prohibit amendment of the
CAWMP in compliance with all applicable statutes and rules.
D. Defendant shall pay to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources a
civil penalty of $5000, without interest, in accordance with the following schedule: $1000 on or
before December 31, 2000; $1500 on or before December 31, 2001; and $2500 on or before
December 31, 2002. Should the Defendant fail to fully comply with the provisions of the Plan
or for the payment of the $5,000 penalty as provided for in this Consent Judgment, the penalty
assessed shall be $50,000 and become immediately due and payable. The State may collect such
penalty by filing a Motion in the Cause in this matter. Defendant specifically waives any right to
contest the penalty pursuant to Chapter 150B of the General Statutes or to seek remission of the
penalty pursuant to G.S. 143B-282.1(c).
F. The civil penalties set forth in this Consent Judgment are for violations alleged in
the Complaint. The Parties recognize that any violations not known to the State at the time of
this Consent Judgment or committed after the entry of this Consent Judgment are subject to all
means of enforcement provided to the State by statute or common law.
This the l 0 day of �w , 2000, at7—. m.
Hon. Steve A. Balog
Superior Court Judge
7

We consent:
Mike Clayton, De ndant
Ronnie P. King
RONNIE P. KING, P.A.
Attorney for Defendant
kr
� ( )� /2
T. Stevens, Direc r
vision of Water Q lity
of Environment and Natural Resources
� a � /-Y - r
'
Philip A. Afelfer
Special Deputy Attorney GeneraI
North Carolina Department of Justice

EXHIBIT
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANTARD
INTERIM STANDARD
for
CLOSED. OF ABANDONED WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
AND
WASTE STORAGE PONDS
Code 998
DEP'INTTI ON
Tne safe removal and tr m=ent of wdsting waste
from Want Tr==nt Lagoons and Wmc
Storage Ponds that ast no longer in use for tbeir
int:Md:d purpose.
PURPOSE
Mae purpos4 of this cons_rvaiion prac:ic: is to
prctett the quality of sure w'atcr and
grouac.'water rtso== and to safeguard the
Public hr.a&
CONDITIONS I'VIM- RE PRACTICE
APPLIES
This pizcaicc applies to anima3 Wave Trca==
Laoons and mass;. Storage Pnnds spat arc no
longer used .£or thcir orig3r intcadtd purpose.
ObjectiYe
The 0bj--- ivz is to re;s►Dvt Wa5:t 1iir Zri 15 to tht
m. _ximttc exL--nt prac:i=ble 5mm a
1aeoorslstructure prior to closure.
Water Quality Testing
No --n-cc:al quaii;ty its' ng will ba required.
Rwnoval of Inflow Devices
Al] devic= used to couvcv anima! vast_ into the
Lagoon or storage pond shall be r=ovcd.
g99-i
Spillways
AD abandoned lagoons or waste storage ponds
than arc not b=chcd or filled chat nave an
ernbauLanent of 3 fr---. or more, shall have a
principal spillway and an emersencv spUlway
installed rhat meets the requiresnear_ of
COtist:vatioas':zcuCt SUmdard �78 (Ponds).
Excavated Pits
For excavated pits thas were ptcviously uscd for
wmste aea==r lagoons or -a-= storage goads
that are= to be closed all nmsz=bL- affnrrs n=
be made to agi= and rcnovc all wasu
mattrL-ds. If the bottom of f= l,ag000lsz*:ic;,irc
is above the Rater table at the time of cicsure and
will support earth moving a *pmcnt, ii mats: be
scraped. A qualified tcrhnical spec aiir raiisz
determine the soil sabliy for =rah mov109
equipment. For iagoonsJ=mcz iris that are not to
be s=Otd and those with bottoms documtisxed to
be below the wars tale at the rime of closure,
-rhe depth of "agitated" waste ruaterml retraining
in for lagoonistm=c ar :ht =-- of closure mzy
oat =.&=*�d a mz-=wn depta of mere tcan one
(l) foot.
The waste water wM be aa21%,:--d and applied m
crops at agronomic rates bassd on R Uszic Yield
F-tpectadon (KY-E.) for nitm8en (Ivy.
Once ail sludg. is r=noyod. the owner ha. the -
option o£v5iVS Tit =U=rt zz a zesa i wzr
pond, or the pit =y be nlle-t
Casu4—*Alan pra_6ac zwwvds art rvvie.red prnajic:dJy, and up=L" il,,tede— ie 664-tin the watt! wmaon
� ui :hat rt=tl�Ar7�.. �+nc+CS the !'F aaarai RaeureG Ce.uer+rsiinn Sr.-.�Cz. — —
CaMPULM Fitt:99i•Ilse.rir+slss.sreeeprr.�:Ci�Ztri�
)JRC5. NC
JANiJ�tRY, t99

99&2
Embankment Structures
If a lagoon/structurc is to be brenchct4 the liquid
mtm be pumped out and the rm=ining w=e
zoiter-ial sped. Reasonable efforts must be
Ma& to ren ve in vaa= materials prior IQ
closure -
For hgoon/stru=res not to be brmrhmL
reasonable e$orm must be made ro agitate and
remove all waste =Tcria.ls. if tlse borctun of 'die
lagooa/smcture is above tkte water table at the
time of closure and will svpporr tarth moving
eq*mcnt, it roust be scmp=i A qualiff!
techwz: i speeis.list must dczttrr = the soil
ssabifiry for earth moving equipment For
lagoo=lstructurrs That are not to be soaped and
ihm with bozwnu documeot*d to be below the
wtcr table ax the time of closure, the depth of
"agha--d" waste taterial r=zining in the
lagoon/suucmm at the time of closure may not
amcsd a rnaxirnum depth of more than one (1)
Wit.
T, w~.tste waxer wUi be zA21ysd had applied to
craps ar agronomic ma s based on Realistic Yield
Txpec.ation MY-E.) for nitrogen (N).
If'intended for use as a brash water pond, the .
requinwie= under "Spillways" sew of Ws
s=dard shall be rizei.
The cmbaalmrccm may be.
1) bttacbed to tlsaz ix will no longer impound
liquid, or 2) be left intact acid allowed to fill with
fresh waxer fur use as a fr=h water ptrad.
Ifzfic embaniortent i$ btaeaed, zlk sloes and
bottom of the bread] shall be stole for the soil
material irnvplvcd, but the side 5iopm shall be na
st--per Tl= a:1.
Vegetation
All disturbed wrens shuli be Metated in
aceordanze .with Technical Guide Standard 34,2,
Critical Ares TsG mcnt.
CONSIDERATIONS
The proper removal of organics end nutrients znd
Prevention of pollutant discharges to surface
waters is the rcaponsibility of thr owner.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and specifi=tioru for ciosurc of abattdontd
wash =anent lagoons and Waste storage ponds
shah be in keeping with this standard =d shaU
describe the requirements for applying the
p=zicc to achlvve its intended purpose.
7f thewane tr=t went lagoon or waste storage
pond being converted to a fresh water pond is
required m meet Consssrration Practice Standard
378 (Fonds), the pIMs and specifications will
also be in keeping with the requirements of than
5tandarti. '
OP 'nON A,'rn NLAZiTENANCF.
A properly dec mrnissioned waste trcaz =t
lagoon or waste storage pond should require little
or no op=xian and nrai==ce; however, if it
i= bceu cwverzed to anchor use, such as a
fresh eraser pond, operation and nWnr=w= v;W
be in a=rt3anct -tvitf the reed$ as se: forth in
Conservation Practice Standard 378 (Ponds).
MRCS. NC
JANUARY, 199,

1-09-1995 4:27PM FROM
I
P. 1

I%
Division of Environmental Management
MkIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of N1CLAf7%^� LEA C+LogA-_�
Samples collected and DHI forme completad by:
Lab Orily
Lab'No.
Station.
No.
Station Location
Date J
Time
No. of
Bottles
M Icy CLX Tti+-1 1-r5-�6na
Z 7 ao
3. is
l
IV-
CL�
S =.",
z 7 ��
: 3--
Lee-
Ioy
!
I
I
I
Relinquished b
I ce ved
x c by
}
w
Date / Time
�l f
Rel
Rec by
Rel
Rec by (Lab)
/
Method of Shipment:
Seal b :
Securit7 TYVe and Condition: Lock by:
Broken by:
aoen by:
T AM 7T<V f]WiY
Lab No,
From Through
No.
Containers ]Analysis
Relincuished b
Reeeived by
Date Time
5
z Sao q;3s
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
LIJ

P
I�IVISEon of Soil avid' `� f 8
1] stet ConserVatEon.Operation Review ; � / L; i 3 � �.� I ��r
'.J.vc 3 �.
.,.. ;
I '13'Divisioo of,,S,ofl,and.Water, Conservatton Compliance Inspection r
� 1��t
u1
� S�7
w.
") Water
Division of Quality -;Comwpliancer Ipecton t t
r "
thej�
DQtion Re raevieYPe
aw
;
Its Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review QrOther
�■ wni mnr� Ii un gun
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
kPermittedCertified [j Conditionally Certified [] Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......1E?.r£s %3R-Jta'f?.. i o�t.,Tl� County: .......... .................................................... .......................
OwnerName : ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ...... Title: Phone No:
........................................................................................................................................................................
MailingAddress: ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ,..,, (ti!1;; , .... !;: 4 , Integrator:
Certified Operator: ................................................. ; . ............................ 11 ......................... I ..... Operator Certification Number:...............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =° =11
_ t - Design:, : Curri
„Swine ; ' 'Ca acit Po" ula
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.......................................................................................................................
Longitude 0
Design Current
Poultry Ca acity, :Po ulatiori ;-Cattle
Layer . p ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design CapaciEy ; I
i 4
Total SSLW. `I
Number of Lagoons ' / ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
'Holding Ponds/.So1id;Traps JEJ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
gn ' Current
❑ Spray Field Area !'i
N
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 'Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
AYes ❑ No
❑ Yes X No
Yes
❑ No
kYes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
lwYes ❑ No
Structure 6
Freeboard(inches): ..... .. . ....... 0 ........................................................................................................................ ........................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: (, $ — l Date of Inspection Z 3
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
i4 yiQlaiigris oi- iigficiet�cles 4 ,66 00 ed• dirr'ing tbis:visit' • Y:oO will-teboiye t}o t'. thgr.
• icor'resporidence: a�aut: this visit:: � � ' ' ' . . . . . - . ' '
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�.. E.�-.,� .�<.-n!, E. ».-�'� � ��, 1�•...�. , ....p �. E�.. pi.r•��zl>>eii�ii! "-' <--13'_k'E Vli it i'.liF't t„ �r.,�x .v.- f e .,, i'ii��U i "�1., 1..'-„t xd ��.�,i�'R.�4��L t„ .. .f� _F�Lryf. i.+t.z.t ,F ..€r�<e.{ e�Fr nE
LA(yca�f r,'.,ldEs rs �riCIIA�Gr f:1.CQ-.SLO aL DE:W_eM) ga; s,(gVrr44,WAruy LEu •r044
6 J S G A l.L a,J A n+;. ru rg - VC4V DES ;✓EO P e rA .0-1 r,j .,J irt4
PA,o75s aF p Gt1r4LbE. Aaa
ItNSrCCr-%V_ e-ew V s�o �j.it ac- AIY Are Crag; a.4 �.�c-ors 1K ES. `no . r5 E t wo 1a
M.ke- kAo A7trvurre_o -rr sfeA4 A4b TOF_-M'49r,Jc 407-uE W XCZL F;O�;Lf_a A40 `f—ties g
wAS JVA$3(..E. rb APtt.y WASrE.S, 141r 4% 2'q-fp;2F_a zT'su.ME,:, 1%eQw "ftr(r cat r&S
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� C_ 4,,,.� �-n Date: -7- 1a3 Aft

�• ` r. � _ {{ � � it
f
FB 18
DIVISION
OF NYA•IT11 QI)ALITV
� f l
•'W 2I'�
2000
Chemistry Lahoratnq
Report / Water Quality
I
El SAI PLUME
— J
COUNTY
ORANGE
PRIORHY
RIVER BASIN:
if
� AMBIENT
0 QA
EI S7-REAM
REPORTTO
RRO Regiona1011ive - -
-- �•--. 1 COMPLIANCE
O CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR{S) :
HUNT
I
J r tirK i
Lab Number YW0650 r
Date Received : 2/8/2000
Time Received: 9:00 AM
Received By DS
Data Released : AR
Date Reported: 2/21/2000 r
Estintaled BOD Range: Slotion Lacalian: MIKE CLAYTON
Serd: Chlorinaled: Remarks:
Y -
Station I Dale Begin (ndmmlddj Date End (yyfmmldd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - Dp1, DB, DBhI Valoc Type - A. 11, L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
20ODD207 I I 1400 I I I I —j
BOD 3I0 mg/L
COD Ili h 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/ L
Coliform; MF Feral31616 /109ml
Coliform: MFTotal 31504 /loom[
Co]iform: tube Feral31615 / wml
Coliform: Fecal Surp 31673 /100m1
Residue: Total 500 m L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 m /L
Residue: Suspended 530 m /L
Voladle533 m /L
Fined 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to I(4,5436 rnG'L
Acidim to ell 8.3 433 mF/L
Alkah3tity to rH9.3415 m /L
Alkalinity to )14.5410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube '/ 100 ml$
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m L
Chia: In 32217 u /L
Chi a: Corr 32209 u /L
Pheophvtin a 32213 u L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color. (pH ) 83 PH= Cu.
Color: pli 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride 951 m /L
FormaWhvdc 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 556 mglL
Hardness Total900 mg1L
S 'fecCond.95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 3326D m /L
VIW11015127311 u /I.
Sulfate 945 m /L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Boron
t annin & Li in u /L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L
Estintaled BOD Range: Slotion Lacalian: MIKE CLAYTON
Serd: Chlorinaled: Remarks:
Y -
Station I Dale Begin (ndmmlddj Date End (yyfmmldd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - Dp1, DB, DBhI Valoc Type - A. 11, L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
20ODD207 I I 1400 I I I I —j
BOD 3I0 mg/L
COD Ili h 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/ L
Coliform; MF Feral31616 /109ml
Coliform: MFTotal 31504 /loom[
Co]iform: tube Feral31615 / wml
Coliform: Fecal Surp 31673 /100m1
Residue: Total 500 m L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 m /L
Residue: Suspended 530 m /L
Voladle533 m /L
Fined 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to I(4,5436 rnG'L
Acidim to ell 8.3 433 mF/L
Alkah3tity to rH9.3415 m /L
Alkalinity to )14.5410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube '/ 100 ml$
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m L
Chia: In 32217 u /L
Chi a: Corr 32209 u /L
Pheophvtin a 32213 u L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color. (pH ) 83 PH= Cu.
Color: pli 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride 951 m /L
FormaWhvdc 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 556 mglL
Hardness Total900 mg1L
S 'fecCond.95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 3326D m /L
VIW11015127311 u /I.
Sulfate 945 m /L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Boron
t annin & Li in u /L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m L
Chia: In 32217 u /L
Chi a: Corr 32209 u /L
Pheophvtin a 32213 u L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color. (pH ) 83 PH= Cu.
Color: pli 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride 951 m /L
FormaWhvdc 71880 m L
Grease and Oils 556 mglL
Hardness Total900 mg1L
S 'fecCond.95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 3326D m /L
VIW11015127311 u /I.
Sulfate 945 m /L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Boron
t annin & Li in u /L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L

AViSiON OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER UALITY 1L-LI)-t I;01b1 (1)Nil)
COUNTY i_JQT� �_� _ PRIORITY 1'I.i T
RIVER BASIN +E-il.S t-
REPORT TO: AO FRO MRO tlfO aRO WiliO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑ STREAM I!Sj EFFLUENT
AT BM COMPLIANCE WCIIAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other OF CUSTODY
❑ EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
F:­ 1-a1. I1— []NI V
Lab Number:
Dale Received: Time:
Rec'd b From: Due -Courier and pe
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
Shipped by: Bus Courler, Stall Other DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTORIS): cJ - a d f'S U,4. (—
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5.25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: M (C-C CL A y Ta
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ Nok REMARKS: Pav LTP- [ ^' IT4-f _
tion # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DAI DB DBM Value Type
0L. I D1 I a� iy:o5 D2t a'7 ��� f y=1� Y_ A H L
RODS 310 mg/1
COD High 340 mg/1
COD Low 335 mg/l
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100m1
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
Resldue: Total 500 mg/I
Volatile 505 mg/I
Fixed 510 mg/1
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
Volatile 535 mg/I
Fixed 540 mg/I
pit 403 units
Acidity to pit 4.5 436 Ing/I
Acidity to pit 8.3 435 mg/l
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
TOC 680 mg/1
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color.(pll ) 83 Ai MI
Color: pit 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I
14113 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
1,04 as P 70507 mgA _
1'. Dissolved as P 666 m9/1
CdCadmtum 1027 u9A
Cr-Chromium:Totaf 1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/I
Ph -Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag- ilver 1077 ug/l
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co-Coball 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Composite
T S B
Sample Type
C GNXX
—
LI-Lithlum 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 USA
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 usA
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
fig -Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplanklon
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (Cl0.0,
mg/I
141
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
1418.3 1,114.5
pll 4.5 PH 9.3
2
94
10 -
300 .
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity R
Precipitian (In/day)
Cloud Caver %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/11
eon Stream Depth it.
Stream Width It.
480
1 45
132
36
11351
1350
135
64 14
E

1 l
,
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
�!
_
'<
Chemist Laboratoq
7
Report / \Water uAil
P Q y
J Lab Number
YWO649
W❑ SAMPLE
TYPE {
- date Received:
2/8/2000
COUh'Tl' ORANGE
LRLO RLa
_
I
1
Time Received:
9:o0AM
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIF.NI
QA
STREAM
EFFLUENT
,]
R"ved By
VS.
REPORTTO RRO R egional0ffice
a COMPLIANCE
.�� CHA[NOFCUSTODY
� LAKE
� ElINFCUENENi' t-
;!Other -
EMERGENCY
-
ESTUARY
Data Released :
AR
_ COLLECTOR(S) : BUNT
Date Re:poned :.
2/21/2000
- Estimated DOD Range:
SIa11011 lAration: MIKE CLAYTON POULTRY
Seed: (;ktnrinaled:
Rrmarks:
Station a Dale Begin (yy/mmldd)
Dale End (yy/mmldd)
Time Begin
lime End
Depth - Dpl, DB. DBM
Yalu Type - A, 11, 1.
ComposltrT, S. B
Sample Type
M CLAYFON 20000207
1300
BOD 310 mg1L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Lou- 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Foal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Sm 31673 /]Bond
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 m /L
Volatile 533 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
H 403 units
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidiqr In PH 8,3 433 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to PH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC69D mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube '/ [00 mis
. s;.COt19fENT5:
i.
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Phcuphvtin a 32213 ug/L
Color- True 80 C-u-
Color- (PH ) 83 PH= C.u-
Color- - H 7.6 82 e.u.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
M BAS 3826D mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulra[e945 -mg/L
Sulfide 743 mg/L
Boron
Tannin&Li nin ug/L
Hcxavalent Chromium ug/L
X
NH3asN610
8.3
mg/L
X
TKN an N 625
10
mg/L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0-84
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
3.4
mg/L
PO4 as P 70507
mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666
mg/L
K-Potassium
MFZL
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u L
CY-0iromium:Total 1034
us/L
Cu- Cpp. 1042
ug/L
Ni-Nickel1067
ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051
ug/L
Zn-Zinc1092
u L
V-Vanadium
ug/L
AS- SiIVCF 1077
ug/L
AI -Aluminum 1105
a /L
Be- ee ilium 1012
ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916
mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037
ug/L
Fe. Iron 1045
ug/L
Li -Lithium 1132 u /L
M Magnesium 927 L
Mri-Manrenew 1055 u /L
Na- Sodium 929 L
ArsmicTotal1002 u L
Sea Selenium 1147 ug/L
H Mercury 7190D ug/L
Ba_Barium u L
Orpnodiliorine Pesticides
Oirganophosphorus Pesticides
Add Herbicides
Base/Neutrat&Acid Extractable- Organic;
TPH Diesel Range
Puripable Organics (VOA bottle re 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phytoplankton

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER Q1 ALITY F
B FORM {
1)
.�
COUNTY c7P� A^.Ir �-
PRIORITY
: TYPE
RIVER BASIN /41EFRO
❑AMBIENT
IC�EFFLUENT
MRo
REPORT 7V; ARO FRO MRO RO�VaRO WIRO WSRO TSOt
A❑
STREAM
COMPLIANCE VCHAIN
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
er
Other
OF CUSTODY
❑
Shipped hy: Slaf Bus Courier, Other
EMERGENCY
L'STIIARY
F... Lah rte. nNi v
Lab Number:
W 4.
Dale Received
Time:
Rec'd b :
From: Bus -Course Land De
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED_
coLLEc-roRts►:__ Ja4.s i<J�1rJ�_
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: jY1 i C.LA i Ta� FOCI Lr�
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No REMARKS: 1~ � _ -� �,:� r e�i E�('rt.�► E�T
ra
tion # / TD
te Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample Type
M. (-L-n �N ' C., �J f �= 4� p-7 1 t = A II L T 5 B C G GNXX
I
BODS 310 mg/I
2
COD high 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
COIIIOrm: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
COIIfOrm: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Colifotm-. Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100mi
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/l
- 1 t)
Fixed 510 mg/I
I I
iiesldue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pit 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pit 8.3 435 mg/I
17
18
Alkalinity to pll 8.3 415 mg/l
Alkalinity to pit 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/
Chi a: Tri 32217 USA
Chi a: Corr 32209 ugll
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt-00
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pll 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluorkle 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/i
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Flardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond, 95 2
uMhas/cnt
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 Ing/I
Sulfide 745 mg/I
0
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
/
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromlum:Total1034 ug/1
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
I'b-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1
Ag- fiver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
Li -Lithium 1132 ugA
—
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic -Total 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/1
Fig -Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organo~xwus Pesticides
Acid llerbkktes
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampting Point R
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pli
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
p118.3 pf1 4.5
pit 4.5 pH 9.3
2
94
10
3(f0I �_
400 i •
82244 431
82243 182242
Wind Velocity MA I Mean Stream Peplh It.
20
Stream Wkith ft.
_
Salinity %
_
Preclplllun (in/clay)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction Veg)
Strenm Flow Scvetity
Turbidity Severity
490
45
32
36
1351
1350
35 64
4

y DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chem
is[r7 Laboratory Report! Water Quality
COUNTY ORANGE W❑ SAMPLE
RIVER BASIN, XAMBIEENNT a QA STREAM XO EFFLUENT
REPORT TO RRO Regional Office w ❑ (COMPLW4 E X� CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE INFLUENT
Other EMERGENCY ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : HUNT
{ i
Estimated BOD Range: C? _ Station t etatiae: GATFS POULTRY
Seed: Chlorinated: C7 "'! Remarks:
Station 0 Data Be& (yylmm/dd) Date End (yy/mmldd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBM Yalne Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S. B Sample Type
20000214 1300
1300 310 to /L
COD High 340 /L
COD low 335 m L
Coliform: MF Fecal 3 16 16 /100m1
Coldbim: MF Total 31504 /IODMI
Colib m: tube Fecal31615 /100m1
Coliform: Fetal StTM D 1673 / 100m1
Residue; Total 500 m L
Volatile SM mEVL
Fixed 510 m L
Residue: Suspended 330 m L
Volatile 535 m L
Fixed 540 mpJL
H 4D3 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 m /L
Acidity to PH 8.3 435 m L
AlkafWrytopHS.3415 mg1L
Mkalinfty to pH 4.5 410 m L
TOC 680 m L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Colifmm Total Tube "/ 100 mis
COMMENTS,
Chloride 940
m
L
Chl a: Tri 3I217
u
L
Chl a: Corr 32209
u
L
Pheophytin a 32213
u
L
Color. True 80
C.U.
Color. H 83 Pffm
C.U.
Color. ER 7.6 82
C.U.
Cyanide 720
L
Fluoride 951
L
Formaldehyde 71880
L
Grease and Oils 556
L
Hardness Total900
L
Specilic Cond. 95
umhos/cm2
M13AS 39260
L
Phrnols 327M
L
Sulfate 945
m
L
Sulfide 745
L
Boron
Tannin R Li in
u
L
Hexavalent Chromium
u
L
X
NH3 as 14 610
740
m
L
X
TKN an N 625
900
m
L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.03
m
L
X
P: Total as P 565
85
L
X
PO4 as P 70507
79
oWL
P: Dissolved as P 666
m
L
K-Potassium
m
L
Cd- Cadmium 1027
u
L
CrAChromlum:Total1034
u
L
Cu- Copper 1042
u
L
Ni-Nickel 1067
u
L
Pb- Lead 1051
u
L
Zst• Znc 1092
u
L
V-Vanadium
u
L
$ilverID77
ugfL
Al -Aluminum 1105
u
L
Be- Beryllium 1012
u
L
Ca- Calcium 916
m
L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u
L
Fe• Iran 1045
u
L
Li -Lithium 1132
u
L
Mg. Magmsium 927
mgfL
Mn-Ma 1D35
u
L
Na- Sodium 929
mFZL
ArsenieTotal1002
u
L
Se -Selenium 1147
WL
11 - Mercury 71900
u
L
Ba_Banum
L
organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphonts Pesticides
Acid Herbicide
Base/Neutrai&Acid Extractable Org&mcs
TPH Diesel Ra
Formable Organics (VOA bottle
d)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline RaTE
Phytoplanktan

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Wh'TL'1t Q Ll� rl dip �fDMI)
0
COUNTY / "rS CS r=.-
PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER'13ASIN /�jj_L 5 F
❑AM111ENT
❑
❑ 5TIti AM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO b1RO�aRO WIRO WSRO TS
QA
AT BM
❑
❑ LAKE
❑
INFLUENT
Other
COi11PLIANCE CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courler tafltherEMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
COL_ LECTOR_I.5�.._): ;)I,j 0 t)qT—
Eatlmated BOD Range: 0-5l5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: GArU f pul.T
Seed: Yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes❑ N00 REMARKS: AWLS {,A6o7r.� ���.s►�rd�-
V. 1,.1, 11.. ntut v
Lab Number:
_
Date Received:
,
Ime:
Rec'd b
From: Sus-Courie and Del
DATA ENTRY Y
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Station # Date Begin lyy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DR DBM
Value Type
Composite Sample T
A H L
T 5 B C Z GNXX
1
BOD5 310 mg/I
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Lour 335 mg/1
4
COIIIorm: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
C01110rm: Tube Fecal 31615 /100mi
7
Celllorm: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 u'gA
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed Sl0 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 n19/1
~13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pl1 403 units
15
Acidity to pll 4.5 436 mg/I
16
`
Acidity to ph 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pli 8.3 415 mg/1
18L
Alkalinity to pll 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/1
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/i
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 C.
Color:{pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 ntg/I
id Fluore 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MRAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/I
N113 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3'as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 7050 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmium 1027 ugn
Cr-Chr011dum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-CopperCuopper 1042 USA
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag ilver 1077 ug/I
Ai -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Li-Lithlum 1132 ug/I
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/1
Ma -Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
A rsen ic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147 ugA
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochiorine Pesticides
Organophospilorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytopiankton
Alkalinity
Air Temperature (C)
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Vdler Temperature IC
D.O. rng/I
141
Acidity
p11 8.3 1414.5
pl1 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
l0
I'recip1110n (In/day)
300 L•
400 1 �_
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Cloud Cover R
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
can Stream Depth 11.
Wind Velocity MAI164
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35 14

Division of Environmental Management
GRO=UNDWATER SECTION
CHA1gj OF C[1STODY RECORD-
For.Investigation of GATT S FbuLt
Incident No.
Samples collected and
GW-54 forms completed
by:
Lab Only
Lab No.
Quad
No.
:{
Location
pate I
Time
No. of
Containers
ll�D
6A°5 Po�IL s-
z� -to
Relinquished by(Signature):.
Recei
d by{ i ture)-
=
rate/Time
rO
Rel.rj 4..
Rec. y
/
Rai.
Rec.• by
/
• Rai.
Rec. by
Method of Shipment:
f7-
Mal by:_—.__
Broken by:
Security Type 'and Condition: Lock by:
Open by:
14A IICF nNi Y
Lab No.
Fur�om{ Through
NO.
Containers
Analysis
Relinq.�:;�ied by
Received by
Date / Time
White copy - GW Headquarters, canary copy - Lab ,Pink copy.- Region
4
'-63 Revised 9/8-7
P

Division of Environmental Management
GROUNDWATER SECTION t.,.
CHAIN CF Ck.'- ice: 0y RECORD
For Investigation of C..'"J` e�_
µ' =- incident No.
Samples
collected and
GW-54
I =:�s, - Date
+z—i, d ao--------------
Lab. Only
Lab No.
Quad
No.
Time
No. of
Containers
t
Relinquished by(Signaturs),•
Recel d by( Iturel'
Date/Time
Rel.�-r
c.Xylj
y
/
Rel.
Rec.• by
/
Rat.
Rec. by
Method of Shipment: STo-
Seal by: �� Broken by:
Security Type and Condition: Lock by- _�_ _ Open by:
Lab No.
From Through
N 0.
Containers
Analysis
Relinqjls;ied by I
Received by
Date / Time
2 / OD/ 157�
White copy - CaW rieaaquarters 1 vdnary copy - �dU , rirlK copy.i
3W-63 Revised 9/87

Irp
71
].Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operati n Review
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection .
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection',,",'
[3 Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine 0 Como}aint 0 Follow-uv of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review Cll,Other . 1
facility Number � «� i Datc of lnspeCt.loli I
Time of Inspection _j -7 z, j24 hr. (hh:mm) —
Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered ❑ Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
FarinName: .............................................................rra ................................................_...... Its':............5 :.1....!.... L...................... ...... .......................
Owner Name: Phone No: ................. .................. I a :?
Facility Contact: .....�. L� f...................................................
.F .....C:..........�........................I........Title:............................................. Phone No:
Mailing:lddress.................................................................................................
O::sh,_- Representative. =-� �� �•..-� T`'
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ................. .............. .........
Locution of Farm:
l n tc-ra to r:.......................
Operator Certification Number .........................
I.A,
............. ........... ............... ................................................................................................... ......... ....... ......... ................. .......................:........................................
....................... T
i.aYktU[IL' 4 =.• Longitude L • �L :
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder Laver ❑ Dairy
El Feeder to Finish Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Gilts
El Soars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
DischarSlreanl InitTactS
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated ut: /j'Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, teas (lie conveyance man-made`.'
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs. notify DWQ)
C. If discharge k observed, whir is the estimated t1ow in gal/min'.'
d. Does dischargc bypass a lagoon system'? (If vcs. no ti l" DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation:'
3. Were there anv adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
lit':lyte Coilection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity {freeboard plus storm storagel less than adcyuatc? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure - Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ArNo
Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
MYes ❑ No
Structure 6
ldoniil�ier:
FreclJoard(inches):.1i..........................................................................................................
�. Are these anv immediate threats to the integrity of anv of the structures observed'! 0c/ trees, severe erosion. � yes ❑ No
se•�pagc, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hack

'ty Number: -6 — t Date of Inspection
Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markinus?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
C_%)°Y
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
[4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Ifs. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Retttiicvd Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
lie/ WUP. checklists, design, maps. etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? Oe/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
'14, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yiolatigris;or deficiencies wet a p4e0 during this;visit' Y;oit ;will receive Rio; fuether
^. a�aut. this :visit. . . 6 reso onden ' e.^ ; . .. .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #)i Explain any YES answers and/or;any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):. <. .
1^11�r-E yok &MS'T G.£-T Tb1F- FL W T � GC-`+ TO Z�f grGuj!, s
01- r A Fc 7- mehrri c-ON T EL F v.Au i EV-) j'1 A ^A 'i rt+a "' f/lu-
�;,%tvti MtVI A s't�+ T:'a,I !z �—­C£O fa SE� A,4 faJ1:I'v
r}I�-
t_ 'Ttl,) Gr.,i-;G'�i� C:1L��C S�� J .2►s �t��
Reviewer/Inspector Name N� JI1 +` C2 00 77 % ��}!. c.L S 7r =4=7ao ;, ZS.3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 4,._.I:t VL1 Date: Z I 1

- -29- . Z9z-S 4 : 2 7 PM r ROr-1 �.
{

I%
Division of Environmental u-anageaent
MkIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of c�t.:6i 7-a J _ �-�� C Lug-r�
Sarples collected and DXI for --a co=letad by:
Lab Only' i
Lab'No.
S tat{ on.
No.
Station Location
Date
Tipe
No. of
Battles
aJ Qfi5d
I
^4
al-
L e
I"
ov
1
I
Reliavuisned bV,±-Ina7Lr)
tz al
IKcby
Rice{ved 4
t
Date / Ti.:-e
Re,
Rec by
Re'
Rec. by (Lab)
-ethod of Shipment:
}}
I
Security Type and Condition:
Seal bv:
Lack bv:
Broken bv:
Open bv: i
T..4R 115E ONTN
Lab No. No.
Container �
'bv
sis Re?neuisnedFrom
Received by
Date / Time
I I ! I I �
Y

w
�.

Division of Environmental Manageme�a
CHAIN OF CUSTODY: RECORD
For Investigation of� i. Boa �`t•,�
Samples collected and Dill. forms completed
by:
b Orily
Lab'•N1yo��.
Station.
No.
Station Location
Data
`• _LFf
Tama
No. of
Battles
dJ
i
M'ram- C�LA�( rc:.,J
etC.04-3 tc•xn
3 3 O o
3_ zz
z
Mi C.J..!: ran
3 3 ob
$>.5Z
1
Relinquished by Signs ure)•
ed.by
t e):
Date / Time
:3.60 a : SO
Rai
Rim
b
el
Rec
by
1
Rec
by (Lab)
Method of Shipment:
Seal b :
Security —Type and Condition: Lock b
Broken by:
en by:,
T All TTCV nWTV
��,,—Rglinqulr-hed-by.
by
Date Time'

�`- -FROM NO RTTV GEN CONSUMER PROTECTION 02.29.2000 16:46 P. 1
RECIPIENT NAME:
COMPANY;
FAX:
TELEPHONE:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile; [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
���-- �10 �-* �
Jvhn Nun f
19i7> 371-l/7/e
PAGES: (INCLUDING COVER SHEET' : 4
If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notlly u' by telephone and return the original message
by return mail at the above address.
FROM:
MESSAGE:
/9s?lf,
FAXED AT

PROM NC RTTV SEN CONSUMER PROTECTION
02.29.2000 15:47 P. 2
W9,29.2000 IS,52 P, 2
NOTH CAROLINA
ORPiNGE COUNTY
STj TB OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex W.
MI HAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney
Goi eral and ex tel., BILL HOLMAN,
S etgry, North Carolina Dopartmont of
En ironmental, and Natural
Re urces,
Plaintiff
vs.
B CLAYTON d/b/a GATES
1THERS POULTRY FARM
FILE 0 00 CVS 257
PILM # _
0ENBR.AL COURT OF )USTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
INITIAL PLAN OF ACTION
Now comes the Defendant, Mike Clayton, and files the following "INITIAL PLAN OF
'ION' per the TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER issued by the court on February 28,
1,
ACTION TO LOWER LAGOON LEVEL TO ESTABLISH 18 INCHES OF FREEBOARD
WI HIN 5 DAYS:
a). Defendant will pump water from the lagoon with current irrigation equipment each
do) pumping is ponnitted undor tho onvironment department guidelines Until tho lagoon is at the
pr6 ri or level.
b). Defondant will secure additional irrigation punip and piping to pump water from the
logbon each day pumping is permitted under the environmont department guidelines until the
lagoon is at the propor level,
c). Defendant has employed Jerry McCullock who has agreed to use a track hoc to
ren ova sludge from the lagoon beginning on Thursday, March 2, 2000. Sludge removed from
the pond will be stockpiled in accordance with applicable environmental guidelines to protect
froi ti any run off,

FROM NC RTTV GEN CONSUMER PROTECTION 02.29.2000 16:47 P. 3
-... r....- .V. JJ P. 3
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETE DEPOPULATION OF ANIMALS FROM FARM
A) Defendent has secured a pmessor that can slaughter 6,500 of the chlokons located
on I he farm by March 5, 2000,
B) Defendant will continue to took for processors that can aocept the Dolbrndant's
C) Defendant will have the entire chiekcn population disposed of and the operation
on or before April 30, 2000.
This February 29, 2000.
RONNIE P. KING, PA
Ronnie P, King
Attomoy at Law
P-. 0, Box 1195
Roxboro, N, C. 27573
336•599.211 S
State Bar N 2537

I'R6l1 NC RTTV GEN CONSUMER PROTECTION
02.29.2000 16:47 P. 4
P. 0
TN CAROLINA
NGE COUNTY
1, Mike Clayton, first being duly sworn, depose and say;
1 am the befendont in the above entitled action, that l have read the foregoing initial
PI n of Action and the matters and things therein alleged are true to the best of my knowledge
on j constitute a plan of action that 1 beliove will bring my lagoon in compliance with the State
to] Iows,
Mike Clayton
TH CAROI.INA
ANGE COUNTY
I, ---1 a Notary Public of the 0br000ld Stato and County, do hereby
if y that Mike, Clayton did porsonally appear before me this day and aoknowledgod the due
lion of the foregoing instrument,
Witness my hand and official seal, this the 291h day of1'ebmary, 2000.
Notvy Public
�M00,ENDwwd1

NC PTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
r
t
Mar 7 '00 11:32 P.01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.O. Box 629 .
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (919) 71.6-6050
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
March 7, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME: Mr, John Hunt
COMPANY: DENR Raleigh Regional Office
FAX. [phone]
PHONE: [phone]
PAGES: 3 (INCLU)ING COVER SHEET)
RE: Gates Bros. Poultry Farin
If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify us by telephone and return the original message
by return mail at the above address.
FROM: PhUip A. Tel:fer, Special Deputy Attorney General
MESSAGE: Attached is 2nd Plan of Action filed in Orange County. I'll give you a call
to discuss later today.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PRCT Pax:9197166050
Mar 7 '00 11:33
81,87.29e0 12:48
a",
P. 1
11
FROM RONNIE P. KING, P.R. ATTDRNE4
G
NORTH CAROLINA
ORANGE COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex ml.
MiCHAE� F. EASLEY, Attorney
General artd ex reel., BILL HOLMAN,
Secretary,.North Carolina Department of
Environmontal, and Natural
Resources,
Plaintiff
vs.
MIKE CLAYTON d(b/aGATESr'
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM
FILE # OD CVS 257
FILM #_
QENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
30 DAY PLAN OF ACTION
Now comes the Defendant, Mike Clayton, and files the following "INITIAL PLAN OF
ACTION" per the TEMPORARY RF,STRAINING ORDER issued by,the court on February 28,
2000.
ACT10N TO LOWER LAGOON LEVEL TO ESTABLISH 24 INCHES OF FREEBOARD
WITHIN 30 DAYS:
a). Defendant will pump water from the lagoon with current irrigation equipment each
day pumping is permitted under the environment department guidelines until the lagoon is at the
proper level. Data sheets to be supplied within 10 days.
b). Defendant has secured an additional irrigation pump and piping to pump water from
the lagoon each day pumping is permitted under the environment department guidelines until the
lagoon is of the proper level.
c). Defendant has employed Jerry MCCullock who is currently on site, using a track hoe
to remove sludge from the lagoon, Sludge removed from the pond will be stockpiled in
accordance with applicable environmental guideline to protect from any run off.
rwwEN3+ww

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Eax:9197165050 liar 7 '00 11:33 P.03
wM
FROM RONNIE P. KINGI P,A. ATTORNEY 93.07.2000 1 1 : 2 7 P. 2
2.
SCHEDULE FOR COMPI - M. DEPOPULA'nOhi OF AN?IutALT.S PROM FAT± V.
A \ R . —
,r1 r411-1 MI11 �4MV �a.0 •:.Zaw Ahr 4�n• t-- �I'11 I•.l S 0
- ----- .`. j/AVYY.hri/A y„µ• yWy, olau&L u,.3VV {il i!!G lJll[%1CCli8 10CgC�0
on the Farm by March 5, 2000.
B}'. Defendant will remove an additional 24,500 chickons by March 15: 2000.
C) Defendant will have the entire chicken- nonulatior► djq-v-q&o. nfp..a ti~P. �r,prnt;n*,
• • �r -�
closed on or before April 30, 2000.
This Larch 1, 2000.
Rowde P. Mug
Attorney at Law
P. O. Box 1195
Roxboro, N. C, 27573
336.599.2115
State Bar # 2537

1 '
Lrds
IPA
rl 4
M�a II MO, Im

Division of Water Quality
June 17, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Clayton
6507 Holly Ridge Road
Rougemount, North Carolina 27572
Subject: Notice of Violation
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Facility #68-1
Orange County
Dear Mr. Clayton:
On May 27, 1999, Mr. John Hunt from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the
subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
Division's effort to determine compliance with the State's
Animal Waste Management Regulations.
As a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
The lagoon did not have sufficient freeboard as
required for animal liquid waste systems. Liquid waste
systems are required to maintain an emergency freeboard
plus additional capacity for collection and storage of the
equivalent for a 25 year - 24 hour storm. Your lagoon
contains an emergency spill way thus the emergency
freeboard is not mandatory, but there was not sufficient
freeboard to contain the required storm storage of
approximately six and a half inches. There was soil added
in the spill way thus creating an artificial increase in
lagoon height and therefore the estimated freeboard was
less than one inch.
Soil samples are required annually for spray fields.
There were no copies of any soil samples provided at the
time of the inspection. Irrigated waste records should
be updated regularly.

NC PTTY GEN CONS PROT rax:9197166050
Mar- 9 '00 14:35 P.01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Justice
Consumer Protection
P.Q. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
FAX TRANSMISSION SHEET
March 9, 2000
RECIPIENT NAME: Mr. John Hunt
COMPANY. DENR Raleigh Regional Office
FAX: [phone]
RHONE. 571-4700
PAGES: 8 (INCLUDING COVER SHEEN')
RE: Oates I3ros. Poultry Farm
If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify us by telephone and return the original message
by return mail at the above address.
FROM: Philip A. Telfer, Special Deputy Attorney General
MESSAGE: Attached is Constmt Order and & PoA.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Mar 9 '00 14:35 P.02
FLED
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN�,q,) MAR _ 9 M 9.I�27HE GENERAL. COURT OF JUSTICE
SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
COUNTY OF ORANGE `,)t' "N"), %0;""�Y, C.S.C. 00 CVS 257
ry
STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN ','ex'ret- --r—
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Attorney }
General and ex rel., BILL HOLMAN, )
Secretary, North Carolina Department of }
Environment, and Natural )
Resources, )
CONSENT ORDER
Plaintiff, )
}
MIKE CLAYTON d/b/a GATES )
BROTHERS POULTRY FARM )
Defendant. )
This matter came on for hearing before the Court upon the motion of the State of North
Carolina for a Preliminary Injunction_ The parties have notified the Court that they have agreed,
as evidenced by the signatures of their counsel below, to extend the Temporary Restraining
Order previously entered in this matter azd to set a hearing on the State's motion for Preliminary
Injunction for the term beginning April 10, 2000, subject to the following terms:
1. The Defendant, by consent to the entry of this Order, does not waive any defense
he might have to the entry of the Preliminary Injunction requested by the State.
2_ The State reserves the right to petition the court for Ainher relief prior to the
expiration of the thiry (30) days should a change in conditions at the Gates Poultry Farm make
such further relief necessary for the protection of health or the envirottzxtent.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Temporary Restraining Order entered by the
Court on February 28, 2000 shall remain in effect until dissolved by further order of the Court.

NC ATTY GEN CONS PRAT Fax:[phone] Mar g '00 14:36 P.03
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on the State's Motion for Preliminary
Injunction shall be held in the Superior Court for Orange County in Hillsborough, North
Carolina, on the I Oth day of April, 2000, at 10:00 a. m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may
be beard_
This the 9th day of March, 2000.
CONSENT:
For Plaintiff State of North: Cauolina:
Philip A. Te fer
Special Deputy Attorney General
2
Steve A. Balog
Superior Court Judge
For Oef�ndant Mike Clayton d/b/a/ Gates
Poultry Farm:
Ronnie P. King
Ronnie P. King, P. A.

NC RTTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone] Mar 9 '00 14:36 P.04
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
` FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
FILED
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): Z-4Q06 n
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard ---
a, current liquid level according to
95 b. designed structural freeboard zone
4f'wd lewj- 93. 5 (Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) =
d, top of dike surface area according to design
f4vo.1 (area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48 alg ion s --
12 ft
'9- 4 inches
18' inches
�inches
9 7/ 5(;,, 25 ft2
580 376- gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 197, /oc0 ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g w _9_7, (Qp ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water acoording to structural design O ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design ft3
k. (lines h+ i+ j) x 7.48 x 5 days = I S 1 7 gallons
line f
4, Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
1. total volume to be land applied line e + line k = gallons
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
PoA tS Day) 2/21/00 1

NC ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax.[phone] Mar 9 'CC 14:36 P.05
IV. FACILITY'S POA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
Y. Mine o
line x
00 & 2-
inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
if unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new information.
Plan to land apply hydraulic load;
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e,g.1 Is there water standing in field; does irrigation
equipment mar down in field; "trafficability" across soils; will soils absorb application without runoff ,
etc.)
�Ls-I tiL.iJ� .r&tif ...�,.Lr�ri .�'`L/` � wt.S(.� �/ �L/+ 7 1�,�� '�"'uPa'4.�••'�. 4Y t /NJ! .�},� l�r
2, Date and amount of last rainfall event?
3. Dates of last waste application event per field
U
4, Given optimum soil and weather conditions, is irrigation equipment Capable of applying the
volume in line "n" at appropriate seasonal (i,e. winter) application rates within five days?
5. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include daily schedule; proposed application rates and
amounts per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o° rings, operating time, travel
speed, etc. to meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts; and any other information
for consideration
PoA (5 Day) 2/21100 3

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
_ � Make, Made) arac! Type o�Equrpmerl(: .
O r`
4-D:
o
t a13
PYA
o,,:.,dJ
Ln
CD
CD Peon
�Jl
10
M '.:' _..
LL ..
t—
U)
l( i -- x. t{7�)
1ltr-r-C�z = �S
L1 -2k .
Field No
and
Hydrant No7
Travel
Spend
(lVmin)
Application
Rate
(irdhr)
� TRAVEL LANE �
Effective ::Nective (
{Meth (f•:)-Cngt%i (n)
Wetted
Diameter
((e-!)
Noule -
Diameter
(inches}
EQ4Jf➢AiGN7 5 E%'VGS
Operating Operating
Pressure Pressure
Gun (psi; Reel (psi)
Arc
Patterns I
Comments
a C
I
f
1,C1
17 f
�►�; i
f
t
p i
3�6!
z.
I
r I
-4
f
ti I
i
p
i 3
sli
''
t�
�a
.5-3 F
a 5 I
A I
n i
i 3 !
z- `j-
i=-
�
f
f
f
1d6O
i
oo
7o I
I
sa
�s.3a +
Fib l a.
Sd
70 !
4 {
o I25
I
f
I
f
it
(LD r 'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field loc2tian(s).
> 2Shtiav separate entries for each hydrant location in each Pele,
f— sUse the following abbreviations (or various arc patterns: F (full 4ircle), TQ (three quarters), t i (two thirds), V (half circle), i (one ttoird), Q (one quarter).
<T
May also -use degree of arc in degrees.
r Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1995 Page-2 North Garol(na

NC. ATTY GEN CONS PROT Fax:[phone]
Mar 9 '00 14:37 P.07
. y
11. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure 10: 2 line I gallons
2.
structure ID:
3.
structure ID:
4.
structure ID:
5.
structure ID:
6.
structure ID, --
line I -
gallons
line I =
gallons
line I =
T gallons
line I =
gallons
line I =
gallons
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + g + 6 gallons
a. line n acre -inches
27,154
Ill. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD' .2
' While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan
2 Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste
.-
..
•
--
balance
. . cre�
V. maximum
application
w, maximurr
application
(inches
�+03
-.
x. total acres 'available during 5 day draw down (sum of column t) ; 3 �5_ 3 acres
PoA (s Day) 2/21100 2

4%1

MEMODATE: ;,Z /-23
TO: ,'rrJ"e� (�1 SUBJECT: ���y"
sci Clio
SP ; It � 9 Yc .�av
C r"" PM•� 99 � rv� � . Qa y�. �wI�Q
a V
L,j I,- ��, r, �o
FROM:
I g95�,/s1b
IFA
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
NCDENR ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
PAINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 20, 2002
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MIKE CLAYTON
6507 HOLLY RIDGE ROAD
RowENIONT NC 27572
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Gates Brothers Poultry Farm
Permit Number: AWP680001
Orange County
Dear Mike Clayton:
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 5/21/1999.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 5/21/2002 - 5/20/2003 is $150.00. Your payment was due 7/17/2002.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time, Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty ofup to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Byfflget Office
1617 Mail Service Canter
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at (91.9) 733-7015 ext. 210.
ncer 1
a4v�t
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
tRaleighrRegi no al Office
Orange County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 1 10% post -consumer paper