660073_PERMIT FILE_20171231

'I.,l;cig4—csl*.lig -r..r-&,-v, H ein,4r��w 'xnWfjpve %P.p"gn4i l tiiuefl—,1w",�"`°t rkft&NF4,iramrl%t r.",_
M.
❑ D WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review k ��
WQ Animal Feedlot 4pe'ration Site Inspection "
Rk:.
lei Routine 0 Cttmulaint 0 Follow-up (if DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other 1
Dale of Inspection /0/1/ 11)
I ff�] Facility NumberQ
Time of Inspection �D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
4� 6eistered © Certified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational 'Date Last Operated: -
Farm Name: .. l.t/. a''Tt1 l��^ S County: /.. d r-.. i�!ln.d...' .'�..................
Owner Name* IPhone No., ............/...:"...... ,......,..,....l........
Facility Contact: f 1U',.. :,,.1 n. rr % Title: Q�- Phone No
�..,..../.�.-1 cjCS Mailing Address:... ......./.,.f./C,.,. ....................................... ... ...........
.....*.................... ............,...... 1 Onsite Repreticntatitie:............. "�...................................... Integrator:......
Certified Operator ....... . ............ Operator Certification Number; .....................
Location of Farm. � a (� j
........ 0 '
.............................
.................................................... :.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 4 " Longitude •
Swine
Design Current
Capacity: Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
156
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design:.Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle, Capacity Population
❑ Layer FEI
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non-0airy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of LagoTns / Holding Ponresent ds ❑ Subsurface Drains P❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Noquid Waste Management System
10Spray Meld Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
0<0
Dischar,c ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
.'No
b, I1'discharge is observed, dial it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
El X0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin:'
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ,yec, notify DWQ)
El Yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
BIN
❑
'o
�o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
LJ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[jNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
❑ Yes
61N o
7/25/97
Continued
on back

,.,, sr^ .. �., _. _ A-,P.:�,pvr..,. -�.-,..�cw;.a�:4i:'r�^3{;�prv�v.�•�Yr1.V"".,1�"'z�rtw'rrrThtF7rG�''"mnas.rar• ��',`-aan -. .., - �.
Fa%lity-Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LaQoons.Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
......................................................................
Freeboard(ft):........................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
tv 6,to, 5 ❑ Yes [a'No
❑ Yes [;Wo
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement'?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste :'Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
..(Y..rt..p.... '?r.................................. ........................................... ............ ...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'!
For Certified or Permitter! Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Wepa6y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
........................................ .
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ONo F
❑ Yes [ 40
O-No.violations'or deficiencies. were noted during this visit. Youmill receive no further.'
correspondence about this:visit:•'•' ::
❑ Yes i No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes L!1 N -
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes ( No
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes ZN o
❑ Yes ZNo
El Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
�2fl,_t) •r�, ( - L,.l +l -�G�'s l' �,�: (�., 6 Q
C S S 4-) %J i` ' } j �4 I erS , L511 i r I f v s' G`� 5 • .
7/25/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural. Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 24, 1997
W.J. Beale
Beale Farms
Box 245
Jackson NC 27845
Subject:
Dear W.J. Beale:
Removal of Registration
Facility Number 66-73
Northampton County
q2 n r
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to S 10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
11000
Poultry with a liquid waste system
30.000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
-P=R
cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office
Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax 9I9-715-6048
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number QJ
Date of Inspection 173727771
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
egistered 0 Certified j3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not O erationttl DateLastOperated: „•
Farm Name: ..l l .. ,"n,�n'-x.. n! County: �i�h`,.v. .. ............................
ae�
OwherName: .`..."�..T .......re�....,_._..................................................................— Phone No:..,..�1..�.....�.J.�..,"'....Y.Z. 41 ....................
Facility Contact: Ll..`!.�.�.�.r...H t?- .......`!..{...... / Title:✓,
Phone No
MailingAddress::..�..�...�....� ��......... J �.�J.���'�..................... .'.............. ..7�.................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative :... .........?"-e ...... I................................................................. Integrator :...... .
Certified Operator�....... 11 .. ..... Operator Certification Number;...... ...................................
Location of Farm: 4"17_ l Z .; 7
................... I ....................... : ........................................ I .......................................................................................................... . ........ I ....................................
k....................... : ................... I .............. .................................................................. ...... ........ ..................................................
_
Latitude Longitude �• �� ��� „,,.•„•"' -------
Design -Current
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F ow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
,fpers
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design <: Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number U Lagoons / Holding Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ LagcNm Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ,, No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`? El Yes EKO
Dischar-e originated ac ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 'NNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. -notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No .
c. It'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in cal/ntin?
(1, Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Info
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 2j No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes �No
mai ntenance/improve ment?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97
Continued on back

.- Z--,
Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes Q'No
❑ Yes T
KO
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):...................................................................
..... ................................... .................................... ...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type(r',or.e.,/.... P� ............................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.......... ....... I ............................
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes NWO
El Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes:>No�
.......................................... .......
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No,
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes �< -
❑ Yes 7JNN91,�
ElYes
❑ Yes No
25. Wexs, y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violations-or deficiencies wer&note'd-du' ring this'visit.• Nou.vvill recei.ve-no further
correspondence Aliout this`visit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Catntnents (refer to question #) -Explain any Y.ES ansuers`andid r any recommentlattons fir any,other comments:
Use drawtags of facility to'better explain situations. {use additional pageras,necessary) it
IRE
rep, rt z_o re
b q k,' 7-4 , J f s S•�-�gl� �t¢,� s� f e w fif e
7/25/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Wafter Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
W.J. Beale
Beale Farms
Box 245
Jackson NC 27845
Dear Mr. Beale:
E)EEHNFZ-
!#1 � V J
APR 7 l997
DEHNR RAtEICH REGiolyk oFFrcE
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Beale Farms
Facility Number 66--73
Northampton County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by .
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this Ietter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance. and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
—
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet I
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, �,�4 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 276260535 ��C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
W.J. Beale
Beale Farms
Box 245
Jackson NC 27845
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Beale Farms
Facility ID#: 66-73
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Beale:
EDEHNR
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
SinaPreston
A. oward, Jr., P. ., irector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O, Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 ,C An Equal 0pportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
IRMAI
Health and Natural Resources / • •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N F
Jonathan B. Howes,, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL, MANAGEMENT
September 21, 1995
Mr. W. J. Beale
Box 245
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
SR 1337
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Beale;
On September 19, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts
to determine potential problems associated with animal waste
disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In
addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in
compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

3�.�t-1a-]995 iS:2e FROM DtTt WATER ©LJALITY SECTION TO
RFJ0 P . 02 /02
Site Requires immediate Arttmion-
Facility No. lG a_ _ ^=
DIVISION OF'ENViRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL. FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VTSITATION RECORD
DATE: l 1995
Time: 13
Fann Name/Ownerr JAI. 3-ge,4Je
Mailing Address: _iP.0. Z t!f
County. _ i'"/ -
Integrazor. J,4 _ - - - Phone:
On Site Representative: _ - - - -. Phone:
Physical Address/Locadon:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity:. 7 Number of Animals on Site,-t S v
DEM Cm-dfication Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW_ — -
Latitude: I Longitude: 7 3 • . /2 ' =2 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(appro.,zimately l Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No N/1%c Acrual Freeboard: A41F[. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? �or No Is the cover crop adequate.- Ye r No
Crop(s) being utilized: CdZ:C.�_ _ - ._- -- - — -- -- -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings?(Gor No
w 100 Feet from Wells? CZ or No
_he animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Linc-Stream? -Yes oro
', animal waste land applied or spray Jxngated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(
'; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inaa-made ditch, flashing system, or other
-;irnila_r. man-made devices? Xes or No If fires. Please. Explairi.
�s 5 tnc facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray "gated on specific acreage with cover crop)'' Yes or to
Additional Comments:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
- nv-z,�
$ignauve
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTk _ P . 02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, AI
Health and Natural Resources F
•
XFAA
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ID F F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C
Boyce A, Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 21, 1995
Mr. W. J. Beale
Box 245
Jackson, North Carolina 27645
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
SR 1337
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Beale:
On September 19, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts
to determine potential problems associated with animal waste
disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In
addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in
compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, !North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

W. J. Beale
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
`7 . '�A �~
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality. Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation (WARO)