Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout660064_PERMIT FILE_20171231- . -,�.�rR�r�:FiF'�14.•�•A�,7��'wi��`'-�+-wis�ya`I�Fi"7i-�1E'4t'l��n'�`�-�'"°:s�i?'�,:; "{�+"'rrq';"�ry""ttrti�i�'Ct7F�� �- Facility Number egistered 0 Certified [3 Applied for Permit C3 Permitted Farm Name:6e..t... � Z^......rc!.:v..c�........� �.'.:S Owner Name: ; t3 r.R..l... !........fir: l r? i f, , ....................................................................... S Date of inspection /D Z Time of Inspection / j 24 hr. (hh:mm) Not Operational I Date Last Operated:.... County: 1-7 p�.% 77L 1—. Thune No:...........�� ' '1 .............................}j.......... Facility Contact. Title ....... Phone No: ;flailing Address:..,,,.b X �%2 j t'ri1 - K/ C "�� Z ....................................................................................................................... ....... ........ � ... e_ .................. 1L+ -r SS • 7- '11 A Onsite Representative -10 .!.....``............ .......................................................... lntegrator:.j...9 ....." Certified Operator;........14.4.11 .......................................................................................... Operator Certification Number;...... Location of Farm: /4t4,, v , t'j d,5 J ............................................................................................................... Latitude 0 ; « Longitude • ° 41 Design Current. Swme Capacity.-Popuilation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design : Current Design Current: Poultry Capacity Population Cattle .Capacity;ap Pulation ❑Layer ❑ Dairy CJ,Ko—n-Layer I U6 a b I JE1 Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity Total SSLW Number of'Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds , ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System n General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Dischar-c originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. ll'dischar-e is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (Ifyes, notify. DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a'lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ.) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require maintenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'? 7/25/97 ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes PN—'o ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes 640� ❑ YesN ❑ Yes Q / ❑ Yes�NZ- 7 ElYes EkN ❑ Yes 0 Nc ElYes t Continued on back ►y„v.4"s*.r►..+i.�a�"'quap.+---..-••w.ovarF-.aTw.-�.arse-...-'1FT:`Wa"Up►F.Nm+a'.X"HWwd'Y'„""p.�`E��i,4F.z-u+sMv'en,�+xgci pnssacMs�+�",+!r�yy�k'i;,air%,�J`rr'"y"GDs"'+�4�GsWls.3"`�1s*`+•'_'-, _ Facility Number: e — 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ev ❑ Yes ❑ No Structures (LaQoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 _r k ) 0 3 /--) r4? & i�os �J jam- I�C•alf �t�,c� f7r % c e ►-, cn e ri l7 Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7/25/97 ?.r ' ' 7 Identifier:............................................................................................................................................................................... ................................... Freeboard (ft):........................................................................ .........................................................:................................................................................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? dUki ❑ Yes ❑ No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No (If in excess of W or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. }MP, Crop type f% ❑ DSW Animal Feedlot Operation Review WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection WRoutine O Complaint O Fallow -up of 1)WO istsvcction O Follow-up of DMVC review O Other I Date of Inspection 'V"Z Facility Number Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm) Registered El Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational `Date Last Operated: 0'2 G 7 T Farm Name:�i4..✓....!jl,�!�!�c....l '^ i-2� f .-r ..... County :................................. ................... I ...... ... Owner Name: �►-.i' �......... G.yr w h Phone No:.......i........'�.................................................. ................................................................. �J S Facility Contact:-.5'�."e-................................................... Title: Phone No: Mailing Address: k �Z C!lf 7g- gl G ?gj ...... °............... ..........,.,................................. .......... ........ .........,.,. ....,.,... Z ....................................................... Onsite Representative:1O.�?-0.�-.`.'.......................................... 1ntel;rator:....... .?.... ......- ....................... I .............................. Certified Operator.....................................................................Operator Certification Number;......................................... ....................... Location of Farm: A. :................................. ...................................................................... ........ ............... ............... .............................. ...... -................. � Latitude �" ��{� Longitude �• �' �'� Design Current Design -' Current Design Current "Swine Capacity •Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle; Capacity Population , ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer JC3 Dairy ❑ Feeder to Finish on -Layer I Jas as I gS61 o JE1 Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean C] Farrow to Feeder 10Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity . ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Total SSLW Number of Lagoons/ Holding; Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System General I. Are there any buffers that need rnaintenance/improvement'? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? Dischar�,e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? cl. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systern7 (If ,yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require mai ntenance/improvement? 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'? 7/25/97 ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ;14o ❑ YesNo El Yes '� "" ❑ YesN ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes zo El Yes r' ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes o Continued on back Facili* Number: / 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? rt/ (��']f�—.S' ❑ Yes [:]No Structures I_.a oons 11oldin g Ponds Flush Pits etc. 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:............................................................................................................................................................................... ................................... Freeboard(ft):.......................................................................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`? ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑ No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? INS ❑ Yes ❑ No (If in excess of W or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) )MP, 15. Crop type /i�17 V�.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? El Yes ,LCNoo . L3No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q No 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ��o 111 ko 22. Does record keeping need improvement'? ❑ Yes For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 25. W�ny additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit`! ff Ndviolationsor &ficiendes.were-ntited during this visit. Youmill receive no further coerespatidelke, about this'. visit'.,'. re &,ds3&/ ty,.to better ex r� ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No . � � h-► �e r� r- n- _ of 19.9 _ Tie /L2rj re G o •�--,., a, -fir 7/25/97 R,01 eviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: k State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director March 14, 1997 Harold E. Carawan Carawan & Felts Farms Box 423 Gaston NC 27832 i•. IML [)EH N F1 Subject: Removal of Registration Facility Number 66-74 Northampton County Dear Harold E. Carawan: This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not require registration for a certified animal waste management plan. Under 15A NCAC 2H.0217, your facility is deemed pemlitted if waste is properly managed and does not reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day. Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows: Swine 250 Confined Cattle 100 Horses 75 Sheep 1,000 Pou try 30,000 If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff at (9I9) 733-50$3 ext 502. Sincerely, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-9919 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director October 24, 1997 Harold E. Carawan Carawan & Felts Farms Box 423 Gaston NC 27832 Subject: Removal of Registration Facility Number 66-64 Northampton County Dear Harold E. Carawan: This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H,0217, and therefore does not require registration for a certified animal waste management plan. Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to S 10,000 per day. Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows: Swine 250 Confined Cattle 100 Horses 75 Sheep 1,000 Poultry with a liquid wastes tem 30,000 If you have questions. regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff at (919) 733-5083 ext 502. Sincerely, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. cc: RaleigW.W-dter-QuUty' egionaroffice, Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper