660049_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Joseph D. Jenkins
Route 1, Box 23
Woodland, NC 27897
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
,--,-,--NCDENR
NCfrrH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
FMVIRONMEN� AND NAxURAL RE,50URCE�5
January 29, 2001
CERT=D MAH-
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SLJ13JECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Violation of G.S. 143-215.1 and
15A NCAC 2H.0217
Farm # 66-49
Northampton County
File No. PC 00-033
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against the Billy Jenkins Swine
Farm in the amount of S638.28 which includes $138.28 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy
of the assessment document explaining this penalty.
I
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Any continuing violation(s)
may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do nor include waiverform).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
zn
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-0 1 -01
Air Equal Opporrunin, lAffirinative Action Employer
50% rec-%-cled / 10% post-consuiner paper
hirp:117i2o. enr.siate.ne.its
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Ralei-h, NC 27699-1617
C

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. l(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
C)
Wo
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearin ' - ` . This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
C�
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan McLawhom
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within Lhirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
ATTACFLNIENTS
cc: Ken Schuster, Raleigh Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Iru_'ster-T5well,r]�R0 w/ attachments
File # PC 60--033 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADNIINISTRATrVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC 00-033
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S638.28 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, JanuM 29,2001 —, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
File No. PC 00-033
IN THE MATTER OF
JOSEPH D. JENKINS
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATION OF G.S. 143-215.1 AND ASSESSMENT OF
AND 15A NCAC 2H.0217 CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, 1, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Joseph D. Jenkins owns and operates the Billy Jenkins Swine Farm, a swine
facility located on SR 1511 in Northampton County.
B. The Billy Jenkins Swine Farm was deemed permitted as a nondischarge facility on
February 1, 1993 in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
C. Deemed permitted facilities are required to have a Certified Animal Waste
Mana-ement Plan (CAW`MP) under 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The CAW1\4P for the
I
Billy Jenkins Swine Farm states that in no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in the lagoon be within the 25-year, 24-hour storm storage plus one
C, C�
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25-year, 24-hour storm.
D, The CAWMP for the Billy Jenkins Swine Farm requires that the waste level in the
lac,00n does not exceed ei ahteen and seven tenths (18.7) inches.
E. DWQ staff from the Raleigh Regional Office inspected the Billy Jenkins Swine
0 C,
Farm on February 24, 2000 and observed that the waste level of the lagoon was
sixteen (16) inches which exceeded the level specified in the CAWMP-
F. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
$138.28.

F-11
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Joseph D. Jenkins is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant
to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 and G.S. 143-215. 1.
C. The above -cited failure to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAWMP is a violation of the 15A NCAC. 2H .0217 nondischarge
deemed permit and G.S. 143-215. 1.
D. Joseph D. Jenkins may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who
violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a pennit required by G.S. 143-215-1.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Joseph D.
Jenkins pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282. I (b)(8).
F. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, has the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
IE. DECISION:
Joseph D. Jenkins is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ Soo. oc>
S GOO-00
$_ 138.28
S 40 S; - 2-0.
for failinc, to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the
level specified in the CAVVWT as required by 15A NCAC 2H
.0217
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is _S�_ percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282. I (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

FEB-09-2010 06:17 From:BLUEROSEINC 4346583205
f
To:19195714718
P. 1 -1
filf7T Ynl 4 5
. jekliln-5
po'4

FES-09-2010 08:18 FrQm:BLUEROSEINC 4346583205 To:19195714718
P. 2/-q
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVEATDAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
5D
1, TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
. 1. Structure Namelidentifier (10): to&, q9 - ppe,MHY
2. Current liquid volume In structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed structural freeboard zone
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard)
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7,48-oallons
12 W
inches
147 Inches
Inches
2L �01 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 50 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design ft3
4tv 541
h. actual waste produced c rrent herd #1 x line g 0 ft3
certiflBd herd #
I. volume of wash water according to structural design ft,
J. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design ft3
3JD
k. (lines h + I j) x 7.48 x Z dayg )5q.qlo-'5� gallons
line f 0
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied duringA(day draw down
1. total volume to beland applied line e +11ine k = 19 1,03 gallons
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
11. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
POA
eW&y) 2121100
-�Lo

FEB-09-2010 08:19 From:SLUEROSEINC 4346583205
To:19195714718 P.3/14
1. structure ID:_ 9a, m6el
2. structure ID:
3. structure ID:
4. structure ID:
5. stn�cture ID:
6. structure ID.,
line I = /� 1 Y.7 � gallons
line I = gallons
line I =
gallons
line I = - gallons
line I =
line I =
gallons
gallons
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6 /.6 1, q7 _ gallons
0. 1 "S = 6, t, a acre -inches
27,154
.2
Ill. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURINGSDAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD'
1 While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan
2 Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste
p. tract
q. field #
r. soil type
S. crop
f
acres
u, rernsintng
IRR-2 PAN
balanas
(Iblecro
v. maAmum
application
rats On/hr)
w. ma)dmum
applicaton
amount
(inches)
395-
'M?
q./;�
)T
3,757-
A; V11
q 0
31b
x. total acres available during Arday draw down (sum of column t) a acres
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
y. line o Inches per acre to be applied within days
11A,
line x e2 n.
01 L/
PoA (8 Day) 2/21/00

FES-09-2010 OS:20 From:BLUEROSEINC 4346593205 To:191957147le P.11/4
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed In line y, list course of action here Including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump S haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate now hydraulic load based on new Information,
Plan to land apply hydraulic load.
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e.g./ Is there water standing in field; does inigation
equipment mar down In field; "trafficabilltir across soils: will soils absorb application without runoff
etc.)
5.01/6 will '656'eb
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event? ;�,6 -� 0 /1 5;
3. Dates of last waste application event per field
)-AO - AO/o
4, GIven optimum soil and weather conditions, is irrigation equipment capable of applying the
volume In line "n" at appropriate seasonal (i.e. winter) application rates withInfive days?
Yl(- 5 '� 0
;� 0
5, Irrigation schedule for nexLS-Cays - Include daily schedule; proposed application rates and
amounts per irrigation event: changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, Oo" drigs, operating time, travel
speed, etc. to meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts; and any other information
for consideration
b4 APPI(el W)t44 Sof W"4)L(
CO 7'7 Cl' 0 V I P1, d LIA
4t eriztwe- bt '1�p "0 " n
POA (5 Day) 2121 /00 3

Type of Visit R"bompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for VIsjje �outine OComplaint OFollowup 011if&ral OEmergency 00ther C1 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 176 (7_75 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator- 014-4-1- fn.' le__r
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0 =9 =46 Longitude: =0=6 =44
esigh
2-
t ult acit
en Design 7-6 7rr 7en tZ
1 C
t9tIc 01 TC-apacitfol
inish
IE] Layer
Dairy Cow
eeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
El Feeder to Finish
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets.
E] Turkeys i
El Turkey Poults
El Other
Dairy. Heifer
El Farrow to Wean
El Dry Cow
El Non -Dairy
0 Beef Stocker
0 Beef Feeder
JE1 Beef Brood Cow
IME=Num
Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Discharp-es & Stream lmi)acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
El Yeszlxo C3 NA [] NE
El NE
El Yes N NA
El Yes No C01 NA 0 NE
0 Yes
[]Yes
El Yes
El NE
NE
NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection L-5
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes ff'Ro [__1 NA EINE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes P<O 1:1 NA [I NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes M No NA 0 NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed Yes No INA [I NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t at, notify DWQ
a
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes N NA D NE
's'
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes No _0 NA [I NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No FD_1 NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aonlication
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need E]Yes ON NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, 0 Yes No [03 NA El NE
[I Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload C1 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
OPAN [:IPAN>10%orl0lbs D Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift [3 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) - L 4----
e 4!2C , n I- V� *7
f
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[I Yes
O—No 0 NA
D NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[] Yes
� �N [__1 NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
No El NA
7'1;�o L_
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
L1 Yes
EO NA
[__1 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
No El NA
[I NE
Reviewer/inspector Name tt.1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 2 of 3
Phone:
Z_'� /
Date: M 2—q ho
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
(a (z — V � I
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 0 Yes ONo NA D NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check OYes :No ONA ONE
the appropirate box. El wup 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
Z`N_o 0 NA
[:1 NE
0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard E]WasteAnalysis E]SoilAnalysis DWaste Transfers
0 Annual Certification
ORainfall OStocking OCropYield 0 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections
eather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes
Ell NA
[:1 NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
0 Yes
NA
[:1 NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pen -nit?
El Yes
NA
ONE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0 Yes
Nor" C91 A
[__1 NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
N El N A
rNo[] NNA
El NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
0 NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes 0 No 0 NA [:1 NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
El No
El NA
0 NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
0 Yes
El No
0 NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
0 No
0 NA
El NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
[I No
0 NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[:I Yes
[:1 No
El NA
[:1 NE
Y.. A
Add itioi al,.C6Fh dientst wi4W'i.
andtorjDkit'
A
H,
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit: �D Co ince Inspection Q Operation Review (D Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi � �Roufljne 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
DateofVisit: ArrivalTime: �I)Zlfj DepartureTime: County:
Farm Name: 17 /L/— � /7- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative -
Certified Operator: /' ':�' - -5 -
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
ID—esigniLur ent
oultr.y,
Y11 t MPF
gw- Ml
PEC: i t-vi E
Wean to Finish er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
-La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
[Farrow to Feeder
Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Be f Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
113eef
Boars
Pullets.
Brood Cow
rkeys
rkey Poults
=Other
ther
M
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
NA
NE
Discharge originated at: [3 Structure Application Field E] Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Yes
NA
NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
EJ Yes
VNo NA
NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
1--',
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El yes
[3 NA
NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes
rN o NA
NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Yes
No NA
NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: t16 - 7-7 Date of Inspectian:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes Ej No� NA [:] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes Vj No C:] NA 0 NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes ET;No C-] N,6
NA 0 NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a Yes ZfNo NA FINE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes
2 <No
[:] NA
[-] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pennit?
0 Yes
ErNo'
0 NA
ONE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
Yes
[2rNo
C] NA
0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:3 Yes
2rNo
M NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
E] Yes
21"No
[:INA
NE
F1 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN 7 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
0 Yes
L2rT*;o_ 0 NA
0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 Yes
�3 NA
C-] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes
EKN o NA
E] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 Yes
o NA
0 <No F
0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 Yes
�No NA
0 NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Yes
NA
/N Oo
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
NA
NE
the appropriate box.
OWUP E] Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps [] Lease Agreements 00ther: Z
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes V(No E3NA F] NE
M Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis [:] Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
MRainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [-] Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers. on irrigation equipment? F
] Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: T7 29 D ate of I n specti o n:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ffN;�
El p,� NA E] NE
25. Is the facility out ofcompliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes [?I"FNo C] NA [] NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
F� Failure to complete annual sludge survey E] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
F-1 Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes ETIN NA F] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ��O_
Yes [Z No E] NA F] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes [D No L] NA [] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit'? (i.e., discharge, fireeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'? If yes, check the appropriate box below
El Application Field Ej Lagoon/Storage Pond F-1 Other�
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the sarne agency'?
[:) Yes E] No [] N A [:] N E
[:] Yes [] No E] NA E] NE
0 Yes Ej No [:] NA [3 NE
Yes No
Yes No
Yes [:]No
NA [—] N E
NA E] NE
NA F-1 NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES. answers and/or any additional recornFirien'd'atio'hS or any other, 6tnments,.,�
�1, 'fit"
Use drawing-S,of facility to better explain slivations (use:additional:pages,.as necessary).,
J �XC-1
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: e?,V — 0
Reviewer/inspector Signature: 15 1, 5 la?-? t o (,/ e- I / Date:
(Z1fV1(
21412011
Page 3 of 3

_Z_ (q ( 1 0
Type of Visit 4Dborn ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
m
Reason for Visit (2Zutaln'e 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time- County:
Farm Name: 6t, 11�_4
I - C Te '74; -N Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title.-
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator-,
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: =0 =6 = Longitude: =0=, ="
j!=e8_i—g_nMC_._—Ur,r.enj
S ine N't i
@ TO ­aC i t—
L YjP.5_D_U
Des! n rearlen eeign 01 xent
'e 4 P..5 _U I WrAwce POP— P60— 9TD—aci!A UNFU
�aclt.
I i S i 23 L ME
Wean to Finish
IE]Layer I
I
El Dairy Cow
El Wean to Feeder
I ILI Non -Layer I
1
0 Dairy Calf
10 Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
_U
[I Dairy Heifer
11 Dry Cow
El Non -Dairy
El Beef Stocker
E] Layers
El Non-LaXers
El Beef Feeder
E]Gilts
El Boars
El Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow!
El Turkeys
t El Turkey Poultsi
F17 Other Other
Num e ruc ures:
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Iryes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
0 Yes AfrNo [03 NA
El NE
El Yes ZrNo ;NA
:No
El NE
El Yes [3 NA
E3
[:1 NE
El Yes A
El NE
El Yes [I NA
EINE
El Yes [I No El NA
El NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes No E:1 INA El NE
o
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? E]Ycs No [:1 NA [I NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes M/No NA El NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) _'__0
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed Yes ;No NA [I NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes � No_,,O'�A [:1 NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 0
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) El Yes :No O,NA [1 NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
El Yes ONo 0 NA [I NE
maintenance or improvement!
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need C1 Yes ONo E--h x" El NE
'j
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes o [[1 NA El NE
n Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Z11, etc.)
0 PAN 0 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
C1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) g7_5-64'p
13. Soil type(s)
14,
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
El Yes
EK01 NA NE
15,
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Ej Yes
N NA NE
g
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
E]Yes
0C [:1 NE
17,
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
N NA [3 NE
PoEl
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:1 Yes
N NA [:1 NE
Ai4 �4"
C R. 44
�'e any otherWrorne t
-ifi�'WE&arii-W&g4nd or aay'�icommendMiqns-
ig. (u 'se additional pagesas necessar
'U rawings of facility.,rto, etterexp am sifu:Viion 1�
0 -0
R�j Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 442;&261 v
1�128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes < 0 NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [3 Yes No [I A� [:1 NE
the appropriate box. C1 WUP 0 Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ej Yes :N>oEOI NA [I NE
El Waste Application [I Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis n Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers [I Annual Certification
El Rainfall 0 Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I Rain Inspections El eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes � /No;,,N A NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? D Yes N NA NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes C:] NA C1 NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pen -nit? 0 Yes PNo"044A. [I NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes [I NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? El Yes FNo [:1 NA [I NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? E3 Yes El No C1 NA [:1 NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes [:1 No [I NA [:3 NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Yes [__1 No E:1 NA [I NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by El Yes [:1 No El NA [:1 NE
General Permit? (je/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? Yes [:1 No [:1 NA [I NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes [__1 No [:1 NA El NE
o
AdAiti4'h'a% 7 m'km'.e n0/,qQDF
12128104
12128104

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 27,2009
JP- 7,77 .1
Autrey B. Jenkins
Jenkins Farm 6MZ WV
434 Joe Brown Rd
Woodland, NC 27897
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWS660049
Jenkins Farm
Northampton County
Dear Ms. Jenkins:
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has completed a
preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is required before we
may continue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days of receipt of this letter:
-On the permit renewal application form you� changed the facility's landowner's name-. This is
1p.
interpreted as transfer of ownership of the facility. -If so, please -fill out the attached Change of Ownershi
Form and submit to my attention at the address given omthe form..A blank copy of this form can also.
be downloaded fonn the following web link:
http://h2o.etir.state.nc.us/al2s/aloLL/dOCLIMCiits/CliangeoI'Ownersliip5-2-07.doe
�Please-be aware that',you -are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations.:: Any oversights that occurred in�thc review -of the subject- application %package are still the,
responsibility of the applicant.- In,addition, any.omissions made in.responding,to.the above items shall Tesult-in
future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised and/or
additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my attention at the
address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional information -on or before the above requested
date may result in your application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWS660049
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwaterquality,org Loca(ion: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/1 0% Post Consumer Paper
Sincerely,
'JAd
Mi'Vesa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
N'cp'r'th Carol i na
Nahirallil
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Custorner Service: [phone]

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN "�. APR - 9 -
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface
and/or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used tqreduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste
utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer
value of the waste and to ensure that itits applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste
based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be
applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems, To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management
facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 21-11.0217
adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, tons,etc.)
500 animals X 751 gal. wastelanimaltyear = 375,500 gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
500 animals X 2.3 lbs. PANIanimaltyear = 1150 lbs. PANtyear. (PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to
apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
Field
soil
Crop
Real
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs.N
Months
Type
Yld./Ac
per
Used
Applied
acre
595
6A
Craven
Fescue/
hay
3.8
50
110
5 x 75%
3-75-
712
Aug 1-
July 31
7A
Craven
Fescue/
hay
3.8
50
190
2 x 75%
1-�
285
I
Aug 1-
July 31
7
Craven
Fescue/
! hay
3.8
so
110
3.5 x
75% q.42-
499
Aug 1-
July 31
6
Craven
Cotton
600
.12
7JL
6 x 75%
+ 9
324
Mar 15-
Aug 1
5
Craven
Cotton
600
.12
IA
2 x 75%
1.5
108
Mar 15-
Aug 1
456
1
Craven
Cotton
600
.12
-72,
11.9 x
7 5 % SJ'A
642
Mar 15-
Aug I
1
Craven
Small
50
11.9 x
446
Sept I -
grain
7 5 %
Mar3l
Tract
Field
soil
Crop
Real
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Months
Type
Yld./Ac
per
Used
Applied
acre
595
6A
Craven
Fescue/
3.8
50
5 x 75%
712
Aug 1-
hay
3,-7 5*
July 31
7A
Craven
Fescue/
3.8
50
2 x 75%
285
Aug 1-
hay
1 -5
July 31
7
Craven
Fescue/
3.8
50
3.5 x
499
Aug I-
-ha-y. -- - --
75% cl-A
July 31_
6
Craven
Soybeans
40
160
6 x 75%
720
Apr 1-
4-5
Sept 15
5
Craven
Soybeans
40
160
2 x 75%
240
Apr 1-
J-5-
Sept 15
456
1
Craven
Soybeans
40
160
11.9 x
1428
pr 1-
75% S.11,
e t 15
1
Craven
Small
50
11.9 x
446
Sept 1-
t'l?-

Total Table 1 WITH COTTON 22.8 3016
Total Needed 3016
Amount of N Produced 1150
Surplus or Deficit -1866
Total Table 2 WITH SOYBEANS 22.8 4330
Total Needed 4330
Amount of N Produced 1150
Surplus or Deficit -3180
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied,
they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE., The applicator is cauboned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
This plan only addresses N"en. When using soybeans in the rotation 20 pgunds of N should be reduced
from the following yees crop.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and *11 require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrients or other elements.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate(In/Hrl Amount(In.)
6A
Craven
Fescue hay
0.4
1.0
7A
Craven
Fescue hay
0.4
1.0
7
Craven
Fescue hay
0.4
1.0
6
Craven
Cotton, beans
.35
1.0
5
Craven
Cotton, beans
.35
1.0
T456 F1
Craven
Cotton, b
5
1.0
—1
Craven
Small grain
0.4
1.0
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on
the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your
structure exceed Elevation 98.6.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservabon Service office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of Operation: Waste will be pumped on cotton, soybeans, small grain and fescue for hay.

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited,
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of adequate.
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not
own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a
copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables
at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied an land eroding less than 5 ton per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at. more
than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass
filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393-Filter Strips)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation filled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See"Weather and climate in N.C." for guidance.)
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control
odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.

9. Animal waste shall be applied on aclively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to depth that would
prohibit growth, The potential for saft damage from animal waste
should also be considered.
10, Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm
shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and
any perennial stream or river other than an irrigation ditch or canal.
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standard
393-Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
16. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved
as a land applications site by a 'lechnical specialist'. Animal waste
applied on gnassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates and in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation
such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected
regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.

18. If animal production at the facility is to be or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan"which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills,
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied
preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all
waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the
liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years and a liquid waste analysis
be taken at least twice each year consistent with waste utilization
plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years.
23, Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLANAGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Dwight Jenkins
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above, I (we) know
that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or
construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe
than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of
the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner., Dwight Jenkins
Signature: —Date'.
Technical Representative: Tony Short
Affiliation: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address Agency: P.O. Box 218
Jackson N.C. 27845
Sign

y4
Lj
ir

29.1 i2h
NCDENP*
North Carolina Depaqment of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Autrey B Jenkins
Jenkins Farm
434 Joe Brown Rd
Woodland, NC 27897
Dear Autrey B Jenkins:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 1, 2009
Dee Freeman
Secretary
T7
F
OCT 15 ?009
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660049
Jenkins Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Northampton County
In accordance with your requests for renewal and change of ownership, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Autrey B Jenkins, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Jenkins Farm, located in Northampton County, with a swine animal capacity of
no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish:
Feeder to Finish: 500
Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder-,
Farrow to Wean:
Gilts:
Farrow to. Finish:
Farrow to Feeder:
Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS660049 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational inforination must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keening and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms arc unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Rale�gh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location! 2728 Capital Bivd , Ra4gh. North Caroiina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] k Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NorthCarofina
internet: www.ncwatera.vality.org
4n Equal OpDorunity � Affirntalivq Action ErnDloyer Nawl-ally

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this pennit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual pennit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/waming information for your county by calling the Wakefield, VANational
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at www.erh.noaa.gov/er/akq/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
f
A4
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc..;)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Northampton County Health Department
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Murphy -Brown, LLC
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS660049)
AFO Notebooks

___1 . 1-7 - Q
e sourc
IvisioniiHol H an a "I C( se in
HIA 10
110
�11 1110 1 A
'rype of Visit: �Ktom
,096ce inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assista"77
Reason for Visit:-90uoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone:
Onsi(eRcprcscntative: poet,/
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certirication Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
[��o
N A
[—] NE
Discharge originated at: F] structure Application Field Other:
z
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Yes
NA
Ej NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
Yes
No
NA
[-] NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
Yes
E] NA
E] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes
E] NA
N E
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Yes
No
[] NA
N F
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

1pacility Number: 1/9 Date of I n spection: 116
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
Yes
No NA
NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural fireeboard?
[E:J] Y e s
No D NA
NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): et
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
E] Yes
No NA
NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
Yes
No [:] NA
0
ONE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat,notifyDWR
N
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? D Yes N A [:] N E
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [—] Yes
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) [—DYes ;No),DNA ONE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes VNo [:] NA E] NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Yes VNo
NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
D Yes No
NA
NE
F-1 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN M PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus [:] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window E] Evidence of Wind Drift D Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 56 y&2tA V 4 6f- r A4 tt r"q'-C e-_j
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Yes N
NA
D NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Yes
NA
E] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
E:] Yes No
D NA
NE
acres determination?
1�16
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
IFJ Yes
NA
N E
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes VN o
NA
N E
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Yes o
f"o
VNo
Ej NA
D NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
0 NA
ONE
the appropriate box.
[:] WUP OChecklists [:] Design D Maps [:] Lease Agreements
DOther:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:] Yes &No
N A
[:] N E
D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soi I Analysis
D Waste Transfers
Weather Code
Rainfall D Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
S dge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Yes 0
rNo
E-] NA
Ej NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Yes
[,,uNA
—, NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: __j Date of Inspection-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes eNo NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 0 Yes ONA NE
�00
the appropriate box(es) below.
M Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
F-1 Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation ofan actively certified operator in charge? Yes 61"'0 NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes 9zo 0 NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
0 Yes
0 No
E] NA
0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
0 Yes
0 No
0 NA
0 NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Yes
ONo
[:INA
ONE
permit? (i.e., discharge, fireeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Ej Yes
Ej N o
[:] N A
Ej N E
Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
0 Yes
0 No
0 NA
[:] N E
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
E] Yes
[:] No
0 NA
0 NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
E] Yes
0 No
0 NA
[:] NE
i�(iUlerjlto"q U I C j, . ... ..
S Ekp' la" V K'an's-wers7iiiid/bir�Why
�kdd]416
411;11:."V'111-1i�0 V1141
seArs'Whi�gioffii6l ty,to�ibetter,,,,!�xplaiii'siti�tio"s.,(us��additibnkl�pages.as,necessat�y)!"!,.iI KHC'!.�
.... .. .......
..... .... .. .
C-V'�
C45 69 4
57
Reviewer/ Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: TC-14 a -
Page 3 of 3
Phone. '721-yZao
Date: _�4zl'g Its
2;4a015

Type of Visit: 0 Com nee Inspection U Operation Review C) Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: �=uutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
/_7 I Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Dtu �� � );�'n y Owner Email:
L.J
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: 139 t" I 1".To � �!, �-
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: M 13 5
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
u
!CD
1"Ou"" n
'C
in 'C. =PC i dp-
tr%1Vjie1`
W t y
i [try,
.i
G ci
C
0
WeRin
C
C%apacit
ac ty
a P3
Y,
0
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I jNon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
esi n
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
pacit-
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
oults
er T_
Other
Dischar2es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Ej Yes ZNo 0 NA ENE
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure E Application Field E] Other: I--,'
a. Was the conveyance man-made? Yes NA 0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) Yes gN 0 NA E NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? 11_-�
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) E Yes NA E NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes
Yes NA E NE
3. Were % there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes FNo 0 NA E NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Fa�ili!y Nu4nber: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes Ef No� NA 0 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes ;>No 0 NA 0 NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2 3 It
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes ZNo NA [—] NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6, Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 Yes :No ONA ONE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental, " a t , notify DWR
" Z
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes 0 NA [—] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? YVS � No NA ONE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes :eNo 0 NA ONE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ApplicatiOR
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes 0 NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes No 0 NA NE
0 Excessive Ponding Ej Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ciround 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
F-1 PAN F-1 PAN> 10%or l0lbs. Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate ManUre/Sludge into Bare Soii
0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): 15' M9 r q, 1 ')5 4
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Pen -nit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? I ryes, check
the appropriate box.
OWUP OChecklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Lease Agreements
Yes
3"
G3� 0 NA
VN
ONE
Yes
o NA
0
XNo
0 NE
E Yes
] Y c s
No NA
� Ej
[:] N E
0 Yes
01�� 0 NA
VNo
0 NE
0 Yes
NA
NE
0 Yes
NA
jNo
N E
[:] Yes
E] NA
Ej NE
0 Other:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. EjYes [ZNo ONA ONE
0 Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 1 0 Weather Code
0 Sludge Survey
MRainfall OStockingO Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspecti
0 Yes
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? No 0 NA 0 NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes E] No 0 NA E] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

FaMlity Nu mbe r: 6j� - q9 jDate of Inseection: i;l'
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes ZN "_0 NA D NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check D Yes PNo D NA D NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
F� Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? D Yes Na- [:] NA 0 NE
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes ZNo NA ONE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document Yes 0 A NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
D Yes
No
DNA
ONE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
E:] Yes
[:] No
NA
[:] NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
0 No
NA
r'_j NE
E:1 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond F� Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
D Yes
D No
D NA
D NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes
D No
D NA
NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
D No
[—] NA
NE
Comments (refer to,question ft Explain-any.YES answers and/or any additional recommendationsvir anyother comments..
$2
lUse drawings"of facilit�,to better ex0lain,situittioris,(use additional,PA
ges,as,necessary
C a / (b., OYA �>' —16
5 114 J� & 5-a- �' V 0- '/ q � 2-0 - / �
C7 -_ � r jr
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412015

Type of Visit: 0 Co ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: �=outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emermency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
I—
FarmName: Je'ne=(�Ij r-1112-p� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: M 4H_ 27 '
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
S I I aci-- R-0�5.�W.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
K
La er
I INon-Layer
lampill
ziffy_�Vm
t
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
IFarrow to Feeder
it
�DeNgn
W_
ii� -
pacl
pacl
pacl
pacl
u ent
Rio
D!j Cow
Non -Daily
Farrow to inish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I jBeef Brood Cow
eys
key Poutts
Other
Dischar2es and Stream Impacts
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes 12 �oc
Discharge originated at: E] Structure 0 Application Field Other: I --,-
a. Was the conveyance man-made? JE] Yes E;K>o NA NE
No
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) Ej Yes VNo NA NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
7� NA NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes E6
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes o NA NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes rNo NA NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

jFaci1i!j Nu'mber: FD-ateof Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? F] Yes WrNo E] NA NE
,V
f'o
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes VNo E] NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
M Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
F1 Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? E] Yes O�N [3 NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes VNo NA NE
Other Issues _X
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document E] Yes O-No NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Yes ZfNo NA NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Yes
No
NA
NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
No
NA
NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond M Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
E] Yes
No
[3 NA
NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes
No
NA
NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
No
NA
NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES:answers and/or,any, additional eicornniendation's o.r:any other comments.
use drawings of facility to better explain situation's (use additional pages as,necessAry).
C�Ct_ (7 / 1)
0 :� L(, �
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 7V-
f
Reviewerl] nspector Signature: 7�
Page 3 of 3
Date: 3—(?—(7
21412014

4
Facility Number: jDate of In
Co __sp -7 —/7
_ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? YesX No NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 0
] Yes 2;No F-1 NA NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? E] Yes J��No 0 NA [:] NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 Yes ZfeNo E] NA E] NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? []Yes 0 E] NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes � �No NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the Waste structures require Yes O/No NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Applitation
/No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Yes �Z
NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No
NA
NE
Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload F] Frozen Ground E] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN 0 PAN> 10%or 10lbs. Total Phosphorus E] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift [3 Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 6'G.+ S'r"
9
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Yes
[3 NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
�Ejr�N
IN
E] Yes N
,
-] NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes � rNo
NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[3 Yes [Z(N�
NA
F] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes ��No
NA
NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Yes
NA
NE
20. Does the facitity fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes �rNo
NA
NE
the appropriate box.
OWUP Checklists 0 Design []Maps 0 Lease Agreements
E]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes [Z No NA F] NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard F1 Waste Analysis [:] Soil Analysis [3 Waste Transfers Weather Code
Rainfall E] Stocking Crop Yield [3 120 Minute Inspections E] Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:] Yes ;�001[3 NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? C] Yes [3 No [3 NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

I - '? 9 - I,;
for Visit: (XRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0
Other U Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: le V1 , J, P�0' -/-Z-.t— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone-,
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
sign djurrPnt
e ign
sign Gur ent
GaD36 01).
Pt Pch
11
attle 0
Finis h
Xer
Dairy Cow
Feeder
n-Layer
Dairy Calf
o Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
es
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
ap
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non-L2Xers
Beef Feeder
I
113oars
Pullets
Beef Brood ('nw
d
Turkeys
Turkey Poults.
er
I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
dNo
NA
NE
Discharge originated at: E] Structure Application Field Other:
_E�
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
yes
es
Ni�
NA
NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Yes
YNo
NA
NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the Statefgallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Yes
No
Z�.
NA
NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
E3 Yes
o'
E] NA
E] NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Yes
No
E] NA
E] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

IFacility Numbe FD—ateof Inspection: 1 7
Waste Collection & Tr atment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes M No NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes F5No NA NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes 7rNo NA E] NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a E] Yes Z/No NA [3 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental.threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? C—] Yes 0 No-[3 NA 0 NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pen -nit? Yes �(No E:] NA [:] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ;/No NA E] NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Applicatio
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need C] Yes 0 N7111,1:1 NA [] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [E]]Yes 7No [DNA E] NE
M Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
F-1 PAN F-1 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. Ej Total Phosphorus 0 Fadure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window E] Evidence of Wind Drift E] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): — C) 5 1 ­e
I " '
1 13
(
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Yes
Nd
NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Ej Yes
6
NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes
No_
NA
NE
acres determination?
IT Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
No,,
P6
NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes
o
C] NA
E] NE
Required Records & Documents
19� Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Yes
E"'
6
0
[:] NA
[] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
�N o
E] NA
F] NE
the annronriate box
WUP ElChecklists E] Design E] Maps E] Lease Agreements Other:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. F] Yes [�No [:] NA [3 NE
Waste Application [:] Weekly Freeboard [] Waste Analysis [3 Soil Analysis E] Waste Trans f, Ks'. [3WeatherCode
Rainfall [3 StockingE] Crop Yield [] 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspection Sludge Survey
No
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes T E] NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Yes [3 No E] NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: Z/ jDate of Inspe=ction 7 311
f
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Yes
<1 NA
[] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
Yes
I,-,'
Nd NA
E3NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
No NA
��o
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Yes
No NA
NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quahty concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
M Application Field F1 Lagoon/Storage Pond 0 Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[3 Yes [:] No [:] NA E3 NE
[] Yes [] No F] NA Ej NE
E] Yes [] No E] NA [3 NE
C] Yes 0 No F] NA F] NE
[—] Yes [3 No
E:] Yes E] No
E] Yes [:]No
[] NA C] NE
E] NA NE
E] NA NE
Comments' (refer to question #): Explain any;YES answers and/or any addithinal,recomniendations or, any, other com'ments.,,',','
Use drawink'4'of facilitv to h6tt& explain situations (use additional pages as� net' sary
es
q4t cv-� '� -I) -' 'Z_
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
-73 C1 Z.N 0
Phone: de
11 r'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L
Page 3 of 3
Date: 1111 Z:il "
21412011

4 - k5_
Type of Visit: 4KD Com hce Inspection Q Operation Review C) Structure Evaluation C) Technical Assistance
Reason for Vil 7RPoutiine () Complaint (_-) Follow-up () Referral () Emergency (D Other Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ap'� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: kt 4, w /;,if I Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
a er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
esign Gur ent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
apaci
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
B ef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
lBeef Brood Cow
Poults
Other
Region:
Dischar2es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes NA F] NE
Discharge originated at: [D Structure Application Field Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? Yes NA E] NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes KNo E] NA Ej NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes XN NA E] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes E:] NA E:] NE
No
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes ro NA [D NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacility Number: Date of Inspection: 2-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures obsmed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
0 Yes
Structure 5
NA ONE
2N�ONA ONE
Structure 6
Yes 0"No NA NE
[:]Yes ;No NA NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Y e s NA [:] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes rNo NA 0 NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
�o
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes ;No ED] NA ONE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
/
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
0 Yes N
1[:] NA
E] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
E] Yes No
0 NA
0 NE
Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN M PAN > 10% or 10 lbs, 0 Total Phosphorus E] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ["/L&or
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Yes
NA
0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Yes o
0 NA
E] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes No
NA
N E
acres determination?
IT Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
NA
NE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes No
0 NA
0 NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
0 Yes o
0 NA
[] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check F-1 Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
the appropriate box.
OWUP OChecklists [—] Design 0 Maps E] Lease Agreements [:]Other.-
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E] Yes 4 No 0 NA 0 NE
0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard Ej Waste Analysis OSoil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
Fj Rainfall OStocking 0 Crop Yield [:] 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspectio 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes �VNO 0 NA [:] NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes [:] No [:] NA [—] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: 7,# Date of Inspection: av
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? F_j Yes D NA D NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check D Yes No DNA [D NE
9 C:
the appropriate box(es) below.
F-1 Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes 0 NA [-] NE
D Yes
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? No 0 NA D NE
Otherlssues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document DYes 0 No NA 0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Ej Yes 0 No NA D NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Yes
D No
[:] NA
D NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
E] Yes
D No
D NA
D NE
Application Field Lagoon/Storage Pond Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
0 Yes
Ej No
D NA
NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
D Yes
D No
D NA
NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
D Yes
D No
D NA
D NE
Comments'. (iefer,,to' " y e "', . ­11
.4u6stlon 4): iExplain any, YES �inswers and/or any additional recommije'ndatio"n's"dr a'n oth r. Comments.,1
t
Us�4rawings of,,Witi better exp ain'si. uaif�6s' (useadditional pages as'necessa6j.'
5
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 21 / - q z0v-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 15 4.,_ 5 kw_ —2;;V5P_-(j
L
Page 3 of 3
Date: 1.— 2,1 — lj�
21412011

P 2-W 0 T
'4"
F Fr i
rr% t
,,ae-i
a
i 'UIOI W le
o
io"S�11_1
r ��;
Type of Visit Fo H e Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
3mp
,-'I- �Ie I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine OComplaint OFollowup OReferral OEmergency 00ther El Denied Access
Date of Visit. A r riva I Ti me: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Lon -
Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 1�15
Certified Operator: Operator Certifleation Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = 0 =' = " Longitude: =a='
rr'
Iq jj­�.
C, r
Ca r
M,fllfox
i0k,
C ...
apacity. POpblatiWi Wet P0111t�y
CapaC
04 CA 11",
ity -9 1 ti
.04A.P. Af
El Wean to Finish
10 Layer
El Dairy Cow
El Wean to Fe eder
�,]Lj Non -Layer
El Dairy Calf
El Feeder to Finish
El Dairy Heifer
El Farrow to Wean
Eiry Poultry I
D Dry Cow
L_j FUIIUW LU F�XW�l I
El Farrow to Finish
Ej Gilts
Boars
T
Other
1:1 Layers
El Non -Layers
El Pullets
0 Turkeys
U-1urkey Poults
I
ILI Other
I
I
Lj Non -Dairy
El Beef Stock
er
E] Beef Feeder
Ej Beef Brood Cow
�7--
s",
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volurne that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (Ifyes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of- the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to (he Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I qf3
El Yes
o EINA EINE
El Yes 0 NA ONE
El Yes o El N A' [] NE
;�>O,
El Yes
El Yes
El Yes
A EINE
A [-I NE
A El NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:,��'_ Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural fireeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifien
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2-311
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
D Yes ONo El NE
El Yes ; �o 0 NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
E]Yes J��o El NA El NE
11 Yes ��Noo NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat tify DWQ
0
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes ��7 NA Ej NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes 0 A El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement? El Yes ;No [01 NA [] NE
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes ZNo A 0 NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No [01 NA El NE
0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN [:IPAN>10%or]Olbs D Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Dritl 0 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes WINgo [INA [:] NE
o L-j
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes No NA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?E] Yes N�E] NA El NE
1
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? D Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes No El NA D NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/inspector Name Phone-, 7 7,(�"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Pen -nit readily available? [I Yes 2<0 A NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes No A NE
the appropriate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No 01 NA El NE
El Waste Application [:1 Weekly Freeboard [3 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis El Waste Transfcrs El Annual Certification
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I " Rain Inspections [I 6ather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes
N NA
[I NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
N NA
El NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0 Yes
NA
[:1 NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
El Yes
NA
F-1 NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
1:1 Yes
[I NA
0 NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
No 0 NA
0 NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliancc of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes EINo [:INA EINE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
0 Yes
El No
0 NA
El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
[] No
[:1 NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
0 Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, frceboard problems, over application)
32.
Did ReviewerA nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
0 Yes
El No
El NA
[I NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
Ej No
D NA
El NE
441
.9, - pim 4AAM
Al N, U 4 h
A�
Page 3 of 3 12128104

of Visit: $eFcompl, Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure I
m for Visit: 070--lult"ine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 E
on Q Technical Assistance
cy C) Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:=� County:
Farm Name: r) Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Region:
Phone: t
Onsite Representative: 44e Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number: I
Certification Number:
Longitude:
U
INa el
esign urrent
�ut
apaci 0
W e a n to F
Layer
on -Layer
Daia Cow
Dairy Calf
W c a n to F ceder
edcrto
Feeder to Finish
e
Dairy Heifer
arrow to
IFarrow to Wean
ent
D�y CqyK_
jFinish
arr
Fow to
Farrow to Feeder
P.
Non-Daia
a
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Non -Layers
pullets
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
s
t he q�
JIF"—TO—th
Poults
e r
er
Discharzes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El YeseNo
F] NA
NE
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure Application Field E] Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
D Yeso'N'go
0 NA
NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
E3Yes
.� KNo E] NA
NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Yes
ZrNo NA
NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes
NA
VNoE]
NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
L] Yes
NA
[3 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

I
Facility Number: 0�, -4,-" jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes 5 oo 0 NA NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes No
[3 NA
Ej NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc,)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a Yes No
M NA
[3 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes No
NA
NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes No
NA
NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes No
NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [3 Yes [3 No
E3NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. M Yes Ej No
[3 NA
NE
Excessive Ponding [D Hydraulic Overload E] Frozen Ground E] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN M PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus E] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Cro Window E] Evidence of Wind Drift Ej Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): _n ;�' &_2Y4" -
13. Soil Type(s): f
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes F] No M NA F] NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes F] No E] NA 0 NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable E3Yes [:]No [3 NA E] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes E] No [D NA E] NE
Yes [:] No M NA [:] NE
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes No NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes No NA NE
the appropriate box.
E] AFUP [:]Checklists E] Design E3Maps F] Lease Agreements [30ther:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes 0 No
C3 Waste Application E] Weekly Freeboard E] Waste Analysis E] Soil Analysis [] Waste Transfers
F-1 Rainfall E] StockingE] Crop Yield F1 120 Minute Inspect'ions El Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? E:] Yes [:]No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? E]Yes [:]No
[:] NA [] NE
E] Weather Code
Sludge Survey
NA NE
NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: [Date of Insp_ection: 12-1,( 7.112-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? D Yes 0 No NA [] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes 9�0�Em] NA [3 NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes o___0 NA [:] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? D YcsrNo 0 NA FINE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
D Application Field D Lagoon/Storage Pond F-1 Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
D Yes D No D NA D NE
DYes DNo DNA DNE
D Yes D No D NA [—] NE
D Yes D No 0 NA D NE
[—] Yes No
D Yes No
[:] Yes No
DNA [:] NE
D NA D NE
[] NA D NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any,YES answers and/or any additional, recbmmendationsor.a heir comm�nts.,,
ne
Use -drawings of facility to hetter explain sit"tiiins (use additional pages as cessa
7 — I o —/ 2—
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ReviewerA nspector Signature: t"'
Page 3 of 3
Phone: cy- ze-to
Date:
2�412011

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection () Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time:E�=Departure Time: County:
FarmName: b"dil IZ- (,J:� IV* g,4_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
l'itle:
Certified Operator: /7k� 7_4,ic--1Z*-K- -
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
El Wean to Finish
El Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
Ej Farrow to Feede
El Farrow to Finis]:
El (iilts
El l3oars
Other
10 Other
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator: 4tL, afdt-7,3
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: =0 =. Longitude: =0 =.
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population WetPoultry Cjpacity Population
1, 1Layet ---
0 Non-Layei
Dry Poultry
Layers
El Non -Layers
El Pullets
El Turkeys
El Turkey Poults
10 Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
El Dairy Cow
I
EI Dairy Calf
I
El Daiary Heifei
El Dry Cow
0 Non-Daia
El Beef Stockei
El Beef Feedcr
El Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
El Yes ZZNo El NA EINE
Ell Yes
l2r/No
El NA
El NE
El Yes
WNo
El NA
El NE
0 NA
El NE
0 Yes
E!�T o
El Yes
Wo
El NA
El NE
E]Yes
WNo
[_1 NA
El NE
12128104 Continued

i A
I Facility Number: 4 6 — 4119 1
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structbre 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
Elyes L2<0 [INA ONE
El Yes El N A [] NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
0 Yes NA El NE
El Yes 2/No D NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes D<o El NA [1 NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes Q,<� F1 NA ONE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes Q-T�`oEl NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need 0 Yes 3-N- 'oO NA El NE
maintenancelimprovement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ff-No 0 NA El NE
0 Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
OPAN OPAN>10%orl0lbs E]Total Phosphor -us 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drifl: 0 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) i:j
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes El NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes 0-No El NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, 0 Yes ONo 0 NA 0 NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes El NA 0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes � iCo El NA El NE
Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -�1310
121281104 Continued

4 . &
IFacility Number: �,� — �j Date of inspection
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
El Yes
0__X__0�0 NA
El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
NA
17 NE
the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
E] Yes
[] No El NA
[__1 NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers
El Annual Certification
D Rainfall El Stocking D Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and V
Rain Inspections
0 Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
E] Yes
[:1 No [I NA
[I NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[I Yes
[I No [:1 NA.
[I NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
El No NA
[I NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0 Yes
[I No O'NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an activciy certified operator in charge?
El Yes
ZIN o [I NA
C1 NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
E] No 2<A
El NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
0 Yes
0-N o El NA
El NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
0 Yes
� 'No [:3 NA
[I NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quahty concern'?
El Yes
ZIN o NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
>_0
:No,,
3 1.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
0 Yes
EJ NA
El NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
� 'No
32.
Did Reviewer/[ nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
E:]Ycs
D NA
El NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
No NA
[:1 NE
�Adiiion'al'.'C'6tntnents and/or Draiwlngs:- J,
z_z;� 2-3
12128104

Type of Visit 121"Corn " nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Vh �Roufinje 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other 0 Denied Access
cility Number 1 1,7, jDatcofVisit: 'rime:
It Not ODerational 0 Below Threshold
Al"p,ermitted [3Certifled OConditionally Certified DRegistered Date Last 0 perated or Ab ove Th resh old
---r I
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onslite Representative: ----
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No: -
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
0 Swine El Poultry El Cattle 0 Horse Latitude a & 11 Longitude 0 66
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacitv Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle capacitv Povulation
El WeM-to Feeder JEJ Layer I I I I
Ea-Veeder to Finish JLJ Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy I I
QFarrow to Wean Other
El Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
Total'Desig`n Capacity
ID Gilts
JE1 Boars Total SSLW
10 Subsurface Drains Present
10 No Liquid Waste -Managen
Discharges -4 atrgam Immicts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon 0 Spray Field 0 Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach. Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systern? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Area 1LJ Spray Field Aret
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? C3 spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
D Yes EfNo
D Yes
No
El Yes
0
El Yes 0
El Y c s jNZ,
El Yes
Ell Y c, s VNo
Structure 6
Continued

4 . A
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/irnprovcment?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wasle ARplication
10. Are there any buffm that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? El Excessive P nding [I PAN [3 Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 60 4�2;7
13. Do the receiving crops differ with tl�cse designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
ReUtdred-Re.c.Qrds & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste ManagcmL;nt Plan readily available?
(ie/ WU P, check] ists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not. in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
El Yes
0 Yes
El Yes
O-No
No
El Yes E2<o
0 Yes El No
El Yes El No
0 Yes [__1 No
El Yes El No
El Yes � 0
El Yes _�M �'
El Yes ;�o
El Yes N
r_1 Yes N
El Yes rNo,�'
El Yes N
El Yes ;No
El Yes
El Yes Nov
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
M-2'* !9.1
r�Km s,(refeirfto`q.� u­'e­stii6in#): EiPlainiany.'YES-Answers�n-'nil/o"rrrany',"r-ecoiihiiii�n.dati6iig,-60 "t'h.h.—
WA, r"'aly�o ergow
U i hg si 1
e rd ipages,as, ecesii�k
�.�tti� 004,Wn sft"ations. (uscadditionial n 0 Field Copy Final Note..'z
. R!", . "0 -
7�Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �z Z63
05103101 Continued

1 7., -,; ". �i � - I . " t� . . '�L . t -e . -
4e, J-F�-
file
—5s V
ff
, �r�F A
Type 01visit Efcompliance . Inspection 0 Operation Fteview 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Z'9�outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other 0 Denied Acces's
Facility Number Date or V kit: Time: vp—o�) J Ninted on: 7/21/200(
1 qEt� LqNot Operational 0 Below Threshold
ET-P-e,r-mitted 13 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered ' Date Last Operated or Above �Tbreshold:
Farm Name: ..... / J- ........... ................ . ..... county:wu���
OwnerName: ................. . ................. -.- . ....... .. ............. . ....................... ..................... ........ Phone No: .......... .......................... ........
FacilityContact . ...................................................... . ..................... Title: .................... . .......................................... Phone No: ......... . .................. ...............
MailingAddress: ..... .................................................... ............ ............ j ...................... ........ ..... ............................................. ...... ....... .. ..... . . . . ... . .............
Onsite Representative: .......................... ........................... . ... . ........ Inte grnto
Operator Certification Number:.
Certified Operator....A./4— ... I duz . ................................................. I ...... .................................
Location'of Farm:
1 0 6 44 0 6
[I Swime [3 Poultry [] Cattle 0-Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design
Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity
Population
0 We-Sn' to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder Other
C1 Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Gilts
Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons FE-1 Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area eld Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps No Liquid Waste Management System
bischarg,es & Streurn Impac
Cls any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
E] Yes —a�
Discharueoriuinatedat: ElLagoon C]SprayField E]Other
a. lFdischiirgeisobserveLl,wistlieccinveyanceiiiati-iiiade?
C] Yes
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State! (If yes, notify DWQ)
[:1 Yes
L:, II'dis0arge is observed. whut is the escimited I'low in gal/min?
d. Does discharge byliass a lagoon systeni? (if yes. notiry DWQ)
Yes
Z//
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Ye
Yes'
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate! ED Spillway
CEII Yes;/6
Structure I SLI'Mlurc 2 StrUCtUre SLrUCLUrc 4 s1ructul-C 5
Siruciure 6
IJcntiF1UL-: ............. . q 1)
. ................. ..... 11.111'..., ......... I .......... ... ........ I'll .................... -1-1-I.—I ......... . ......... .................................... ...................................
F-

lFacility,Nuanber-k — 4 1 Date of Inspection Printed on- 7/21/2000
5. Are them any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
. 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancehmprovement.�
D Yes 04,10
0 Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
[I Yes 0 No
It, Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding Q PAN [j Hydraulic Overload 0 yes 0 No
12. Croptype t—,,ejy"e10&
13. Do the receiving crops differ wiWth6se designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? Yes 0<0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes 0 N
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes
0
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes �No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 0 Yes �No
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Yes t�
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? E]Yes 0--No
1.8. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Yes 0
O.Noz
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes � �oz
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?, Yes nN
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? y �No
22. Fail to notify regional D �Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
0
no" reg") nal D
fr 0
(ie/ discharge, freebo problems, over application) Yes No
P
23. Did Reviewe pector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative'? Yes N
I r
24. Does fa i ty require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes
ill I pr No
25.-W e any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yel�
utft�
...............
..6 N ' f h' i ...................................
1. iriip�fideh&.a ou t ILS.V
Comments (refer to question Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations -or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�eviewerfllnsoector Name 43 2"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Y11'2- 9 5100

Type of Visit oo Co 0 . nceinspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit,1?RoutIne OComplaint OFollowup OReferral OEmergency 00ther [I Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: - Title:
/),ova
Onsite Representative:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator: i� � " )Zvi <_
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: =0 =1 Longitude: =0=1 ="
PUFsiN I I gent
Mc
I
nign grent
Sw ine - a_ uluiti
0111161111�61�5—p—aci!_Yjpl Uti
WN
�06—aeitMR -latio
W e a n lol
10 Wean to Finish
Layer
I I
D Dairy Cow
_I
0 Weaalo-Feeder
W e a
Lallon-Layer
I I
El Dairy Calf
'd 'r to
e e e
ElFe-e-der to Finish
-5 -0 v
I
El Dairy Heifer
F a rrow to
E El Farrow to Wean
Q ou
El Dry Cow
El Farrow to Feeder
El Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
1E] _ F rrow to
El Layers
El Non -Lay rs
El Pullets
-
Li I urK
El Beef Stoe er
Beef Feeder
El Beqf n—od Cn
JEI Gilts
] 'i
10 0 rs
1:1 Boars
I=--
0-t hTrj
10 Turkey Poults
110 Oth
Other
urn ru
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse imp acts to the Waters of the State
other than frorn a discharge?
Page I of 3
El Yes 01�o El NA El NE
El Yes 0 NA E:1 NE
EI Y e s �eo OEI,NA El NE
F_ - I/ x I
0 Yes /El NA El NE
El Yes rNo 12 NA El NE
NA El NE
12128104 Continued

I . . 1:4
Facility Number: Date of Inspection j'f--1S2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structurai plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes El NA F-1 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [I Yes No ONA ONE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes N NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes No [I IN, A [:1 NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 1:1 Yes �N El NA [:1 NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes No NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes no[] NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes N [DINA [3 N E
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No [__1 NA [:1 NE
El Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
E]PAN EIPAN>10%orl0lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[I Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
"-(-,7 , 'S'fle-A g -
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D Yes
0 Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination [] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? D Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes
El"No _NA El NE
NA El NE
roz NA El NE
o 0 NA El NE
0 —]
Noo [ED N A El NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or -any recommendations',6r:'an
a �0
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.'(use additional pagesas necess ry):
n
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
PaL,e 2 of 3
Phone:
Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: (;* — �� Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
El Yes
ZrNo E NA
El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
;No NA
[] NE
the appropriate box. El WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
-No NA
[3 NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers
Annual Certification
EIRainfall ElStocking E]CropYield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ElweatherCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes
OlNv NA
El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
NA
F/X/0/�
El NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pen -nit?
El yes
NA
E] NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
El Yes
N A
[:1 NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
o El NA
FNo
ONE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
ONA
[__1 NE
Other Issues
Yo
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
E]Yes
[I NA
El NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
El No [__1 NA
[I NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
El No
El NA
[:1 NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
E]Yes
E]No
EINA
EINE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[:1 Yes
[] No
E-1 NA
El NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality I &d-j
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Otber Agency
Type of Visit 6Co anceinspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
7 14�1
Reason for Visit -0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
t 7 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Date of Visit:
Farm Name: AT Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 0�;tf T
� A
Certified Operator:— Aqqf 01'(e_y
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Ir Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
10 Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0 = = Longitude: = 0 =' = 11
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population WetPoultry Capacity Population
Layer
I JE1 Non-Layei
Dry Poultry
El Layers
Non-Laxers
El Pullets
El Turkeys
El urkey Pou Its
10 Other
Deslgn.� Current
Cattle Capacity Population
EJ
Dairy Cow
El
Dairy Calf
El
Dairy Heifei
El
Dry Cow
0
Non -Dairy
El
Beef Stockei
El
Beef Feeder
El
Beef Brood Cowl
Number af Structures-
Dischaaes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Ej Yes
N o
No - NA
EINE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
V
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
11 Yes
0 El NA
El NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
No/ El NA
Nol[E]
El NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
I--
/
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Yes
0 El NA
[I NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D Yes
No 0 NA
0 NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes
No C1 NA
D NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Niumber: Date of Inspection
F
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? D Yes Z_No E NA El NE
[I NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes
O-No NA 0 NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
/__,O
;No
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes
F-1 NA (I NE
0
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
�Noo
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes
� Z NA D NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes
NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes
No ED] NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes
El NoA NA El NE
'o
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E] Yes
No [Ell N A [I NE
D Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground [I Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
EIPAN E:IPAN>10%or]Olbs D Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? E];Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre detennination?E] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
0 o El NA
El NE
0
0
El NE
yNA
N �E] NA
IiN
El NE
o El NA
01
El NE
NoE03 A
EINE
Comments (refer to question #)- Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
/7 0-4,,5)
Reviewer/ Inspector Name Phone: zwa
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L L�_ Date: & - 7
L2
12128104 Continued

.
I � I
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
0 Yes
J21 �oj[ NA
0 NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
El Yes
0 E03 NA
El NE
the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement'? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
13 Yes
�2 <oO NA
[:1 NE
0 Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification
ORainfall OStocking E]CropYield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections OWcathcrCode
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0 Yes
�1[__] NA
��N
[] NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
0 NA
F-1 NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0 Yes
0 NA
[-I NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
El Yes
NA
FN
0 NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0 Yes
NA
0 NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
No A
ONE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
1:1 Yes
o [1 NA
0 NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andYor document
0 Yes
0 No 0 NA
0 NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than nonnal?
30.
At the thyle of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
0 Yes
0 No 0 NA
E] NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
0 Yes
0 No 0 NA
[__1 NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
0 Yes
0 No 0 NA
[:1 NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
OYes
El No 0 NA
ONE
jAdditional Comments and/or Drawings: I
12128104

MaciiNt"T' 'dffio6t�'��
Fj i miy.�":N
—4- A
0-6i'vision of Water Qualit y
0 Division of Soil."d Water Conservation
0 OtherAgency
TipeofVisit '6C0111 '.11cellispection 0 Operation Vw-NeW 0 Structure I-Aaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Re.won for Visit �Izloulile 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Pleferral. 0 E inergenel 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I Vj?w V rA lArrival Time: DepartureTime: County: Region;
Farm Name: $� d 4 121-h //—I q't__5W Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: - - 'ritie: — Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = 0 = = Longitude: = 0 = =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
10 Layer I
ILI Non-Layet I
El Wean to Finish
El Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
I
0 Farrow to Finish
El Gilts
[] Boars
Other
10 Other
Dry Poultry
El Layers
EINon-Layers
El Pu I I ets
TurkeXs
Turkey Poults
El Other
Discharzes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
El
Dairy Cow
El
Daia Calf
El
Dairy Heifei
El
Dry Cow
El
Non -Dairy
I
El
Beef Stocket
0
Beef Feeder
El
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structurest
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes., notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
E] Yes j2KNo El NA [I NE
El Yes N NA [I NE
0 Yes No E01 NA El NE
Dyes
El Yes
D Yes
IJA El NE
14A El NE
�A E] NE
12128104 Continued

I
Facility Nu�nberi(
Date tof Inspection / I . I —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I StrUCtUTe 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
Yes XNo NE
0 Yes �o[01 N A E I N E
Structure 5 Structure 6
El Yes ;3'-No A 0 NE
El Yes ;No [E] NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
i
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes ;-$!A ONE
No IN
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 0 Yes No NA 0 NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 0
maintenance or improvement? 1:1 Yes No El NA 0 NE
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes 2'No [j NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
-1 NA El NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes 0 11
0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload OFrozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
E]PAN OPAN>10%orl0lbs 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drifl Ej Application Outside of Area
12. Crop typc(s) r-e
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes ZN NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes N NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the iff igation design or wettable acre determination' 0 Yes N OXA.
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 1:1 Yes [:1 NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 Yes � XNo El NA
[] NE
0 NE
El NE
E] NE
F-1 NE
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Name ZOO
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes I "No 'NA [__1 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 0 Yes I No El NA [:] NE
the appropirate box. D WUP El Checklists El Design [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes 0 No E3NA [:1 NE
D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
El Rainfall E]Stocking E]CropYield 0 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections C3W therCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes 0 NA El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [Ell Yes No
NA NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes N NA NE
0��_
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes [:1 NA NE
1E
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? D Yes El NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? El Yes 5No [E] NA [I NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes 2(No [] NA El NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes [:1 No [I NA El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [I Yes El No El NA El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by El Yes D No El NA D NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? D Yes 0 No D NA [:1 NE
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [I Yes 0 No [I NA [I NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

IFEfto-utint 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facilitv Numbei-EIZD—= Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection L—LLP
'
PIfle'r'mitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 1[3 Not Oper Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: -'-�.,�/�/z.�z��`-/������-'-------_—_---_- County: _ _____ ___�____
� .
Owner Name: ��'/»f� x�«�/u�'* J 9hvmc�o�
-- --7'—'-' '-~------------'-----' ------'----------'------'—
FwcNtJContnc : _---'-_----'_-_'--_---10dc; -----'--_--'------- Phone No: ________________
MailingAddress: ----_---------_-----------------'' ---------'---'-----`-----' -'-----'
Oox tz Representative: _______________________________ [uteArvu,r . ..... ���
.................... ............................
Certified Operator: ..... �1��[u_J��������............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Locution oyFaou/ �
_
_
Latitude * ^^ Longitude

IFacility Number: Date oHnspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part ofthe waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application .
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? 0 Excessive Ponding 0 PAN
12. Crop type
0 Yes 211�,�
El Yes eNo�
El Yes ; Vo
:1 No
2,1,e,so
El Yes e__�
No
0 Yes
0
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes 0',
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes 0
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? El Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? El Yes 50
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Yes 0
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Yes
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? Yes eN<o,
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) El Ygi 0
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) es E] No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes 0
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? Yes 0
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) El Yes No
23. Did Reviewcr/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? El Yes
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? E] Yes No
Z�
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? E] Yes No
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........ .. ... ........
..............
,.,Cori�so6iideiic'e'ab'o'ut'.th*L'S.V' 't .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
is,
7 . 7
L�� �dr�,,Wirigs;"617 faj'c'ilii��.: t Uft�r,:eiM�in� S-ituAti6fis., use' addit""Q
qZ8 CW +— 1"q +A
Cl - 12e 4_
"5
-2-1- ­­ � 1 11 1 - � 11 1 .. I... - 1­1 1�1.. 7 1 - 1-l". 1-.1.­. .. ­­­ ,
47 0 r TJC:�, A 1, y ev e , z--,' JH Z-el-, T
F/F` Vt4 Ve
��J�k�
UMM7.115
'T
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
zflel� -71 (Z� c6
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of Iiispection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed ofproperly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
3 1. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'?
Yes No
Yes 0
Yes 0
El Yes 0
0
0
E] Yes 0
o
0
El Yes
[:] Yes 0
7M,OR 04177mments:and rpra*�!ig�.��
KAI
AL
3/23/99

Type of Visit O"Complia Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
P a
R I esson for Visit _G��outine 0 Complaint. 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other [3 Denied Ac�ess
Date of Visit: I '71910 t I Ti.e:
!!014 Number. EM�_� -
I F0 707.0perationall 0 Below Threshold
.,p4ermitted [3 Certified [3 Conditional.ly Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ... I ........................................................................ County: ..................... ............ I .........
OwnerName: ......... IL.Av .......... 99.�-.k'N_6 Phone No: .....................................................................................
...................................... I ..................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ..................................................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ........................
................................... Integrator: ... .....
Certified Operator: .... 1111"!q ........................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ............... \ ......................
Location of Farm:
[3 Swine' [3 Poultry [3 Cattle [3 Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current
e.� Capftcit� Population
W9n,to Feeder
;i:�
OTeeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
0 Gilts
Boars
_.Desigii Current, -Desi "Cu
itry, �, .. % . . I... 04i,
Pou Catd'
c,po u I e. Capacity
�Caoacity, P lation
]E] Layer 0 Dairy
I[] Non -Layer I :: I[] Non -Dairy
Other
ToC&UM§Ijixi'CO��Io
Subsurface Drains PresTt jP Lagoon Area JU Spray Field Area
Irl No Liouid Waste Manaaement Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [_-] Lagoon 0 Spray Field [] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. II'dischwge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is stora�e capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
-1 -1 t
Identifier: ............... ..... .................................... ............................
El Spillway
Structure 4 Structure 5
0 Yes 0
0 Yes
0
C] Yes No
0 Ye VrN
s ;7-
.0
0 Yes 0
0 Yes �2
0 Yes No
Structur X6
Freeboard (inches),-
5100
Confinued on back

lFacilitj NtImber: 6 �, — Date of Inspection Printed on. 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? �ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancc/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? [] Excessive Ponding [:] PAN [:] Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type ll--.e
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reciuired Records & DocumenL;
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, inaps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with'any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to hav actively certified operator in charge?
_gi
22. Fail to notify regio WQ ofernergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, f board problems, over application)
I to
23. Did Revie r/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does
,Acility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Yere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
u t
Z., ................ ...........
..................
coirisb6tidenk e'abbllif this'VIS,
iehi� lgx�tain,any Yts�'"sw`iers anamri any recommen a ions!or.any otheiroc
filep arlditiimnl nnapc ar nPrPcQnry
-zowinar nf in'rilviv,
El Yes
Yes
El Yes 0'_N�o
C1 Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
El Yes 0
o
0 Yes No
0 Yes
0 Yes N
Ej Yes No
Yes 0
Yes 0
El Yes No
E] Yes
E-] Yes N
El Yes 0
Yes 0
Yes 0
El Yes 0
Yes 0.
Yes 0
rq
FReviower/Inspector Name /,I; 6e J,
evio
Reviewwer/Inspector Signature: Date: _;7 51001

I FacifitnNumber: Date of litspection Printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [I Yes EJ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed Of PTOperly within 24 hours? E] Yes 0
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 0 Yes 0
!: 0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 0 Yes C2110�
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) El Yes Jallo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 0 Yes 0
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes 0
'Additional Comments and/or. Drawings:
A.1
5100

Type of Visit 0 Copoiance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit-'O Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other Ij Denied Access
"F�,iiy NumberE���� Date of Visit: - I Time:
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name. &
A14. /Z' ,Is County: .............................................................. .....................
. ................. ........... I .....................................................................................
Owner Name:
MailingAddress: ................................................................ . ...................................................
Facility Contact: ..... . ......................................................... . ............ Title:
OnsiteRepresentative: ...........................................................................................................
.....................................................
Certified Operator; ........ C
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
.................................. Phone No:
Integrator: ......................
Y
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
E] Swine [:] Poultry [] Cattle 0 Horse Latitude 0 4 44 Longitude 0 4 64
Discharges & Strea Immets
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field E] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If dischar�ge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galknin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systern? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Coflection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
0 Yes 21,90
Yes P<00
0 Yes 0
13 Yes P'90
0 Yes 0
Yes No
Yes 0
Structure 6
Identifier: .......... ........................ .............................. . ... .................................... ................................... .......
Freeboard (ifiches):
12112103
1L 53;
Continued

I Fa6ility Number: && Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Document-;
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:1 Waste Application [] Freeboard [j Waste Analysis [:1 Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
0 Yes 01K�O
0 Yes
0 Yes ��00�
El Yes M<O��
Yes �o
Yes
Yes N
Yes
o
Yes 7
Yes U-14�'
El Yes El No
El Yes [I No
El Yes 0 No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? 0 Yes El No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes El No
[]StockingForm [:]Crop Yield Form []Rainfall [--]Inspection After 1" Rain
[:] 120 Minute Inspections [3 Annual Certification Form
12112103

IFAcility Number: Date of Inspection
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
Yes
0<0__"'
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
El Yes
2 �No
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
E]Yes
o'.
;n<
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Yes
��o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
El Yes
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
0 Yes
jNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
Excessive Ponding [] PAN [:] Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'.?
Yes
V[n1N,
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
Yes
[] No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
El Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
[] Yes
0
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:__1 Yes 0
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? w4o
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? El Yes
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphal� El Yes 0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
No
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional 0 Yes
Air Quality representative immediately.
therconttnents:�O
jr�pr. ji�j �. T 4 1, � �%­
�nrn
s e c Copy bFinal I ""'P
4
Fr
Z17 21
P
Y, All, 1:0 i�h
lame '%tu
Reviewer/Inspector P T
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2__ z 2
12112103 Continued

0�
May 6, 2003
Mr. and Mrs. Billy Jenkins
434 Joe Brown Road
Woodland, NC 27897
SUBJECT: Retraction of Notice of Violation
Jenkins Farm
Farm # 66-49
Northampton County
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Jenkins:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Wimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
LICIVII, RAI
REGFr
11.
On April 17, 2003, you we're sent a Notice of Violation for having high freeboard in your
lagoon. DWQ staff inspected your farm last week and detern-iined that you had not exceeded
your freeboard limit. The Notice of Violation is hereby retracted and has been removed from
your file. If you have any questions, please call Steve Lewis at 733-5083, ext. 539.
Sincerely,
a u
n W. Klimek, P.�.
Director
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
�_1311,eigh-Regional-Offiqe
A NVEW
0A
NCDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycledl 10% post -consumer paper
http:11h2o.enr.s1at&.nc.us

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NEchael F. Easley, Gover
William G. Ross Jr., Secr
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Joseph D. Jenkins
Route 1, Box 23
Woodland, NC 27897
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
J,
Him I a 9nni, I:
NCDENR
NCoTH CAROURA DF-PARTmemT aF
ENNAnoHmENT Amo NATuRAL RF-souRcF-s
neII8,2001
DiJINR RAIA 4,-", K'G!ON�,L OFFICE I
----C-ER-TEFIEDMAM
RETURN RECENT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
File No. PC 00-033
Northampton County
Farm #66-49
In accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and my delegation by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, I considered the information submitted in
support of your request for remission and hereby remit S 100.00 of the civil penalty assessment. The
civil penalty is therefore $538.28 (S400.00 civil penalty plus $138.28 investigative costs).
There are two options available to you. You may choose to pay the reduced civil penalty
assessment or you may present a request for remission to the Cornn-iittee on Civil Penalty Remissions
of the Environmental Management Conunission, If you choose to pay the penalty, please make you
check ipayable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, reference the case number
on the check, and send it within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Cortunittee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
may present your request for remission to the comrnittee and a representative from the Division of
Water Quality will present the case for the full amount of the original penalty. The Corrunittee
on Civil Penalty Remissions will then render a final and binding decision in accordance with NCGS
143B-282. I (c).
Alailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 2769§-1617 State Courier #52-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opporruniry lAffirmative Acrion Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper
hrrp.11h2a,enr.srare.nc. its

If you would like to present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, please notify Steve Lewis at the above address within 30 calendar days. The next
scheduled committee meeting is in Raleigh on September 13, 2001. If you are unable to attend on
this date, your request will be scheduled for a meeting at a future date.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check or
request for remission was received, please send it via certified mail. Please feel free to contact Steve
Lewis at [phone], extension 539 or Jeff Poupart at [phone], extension 527, if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
V'�Zc��
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: KO (zhuster, Raleigh Regional Supervisor
S _
Buster Towell, RRO
File # PC 00-033
Central Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT R-EQUESTED
JOSEPH D. JENKfNS
RT I Box 23
WOODLAND NC 27897
Dear Joseph D. Jenkins:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL REsouRcEs
June 18, 2001
a 50�
"'t,
�R
SACC a evocation for Nonpayment
in-s- rm
PermitNumber: AWS660049
Northampton County
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215. 1 OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 3/6/2000.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 3/6/2001 - 3/5/2002 is $50.00. Your payment was due 5/9/2001.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit.
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H.0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 2 10.
Kerr T, Stevens
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Raleigh Regional Office
Northampton County Health Dep'ar=ent
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

Michael F, Easley
Governor
nt and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
William G. Ross Jr. Secretary
Department of Environme
February 23, 2001
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr Robert Urell r_;�
Smithfield Foods lnc6i��pbr�ied
200 Commerce Stre%et,-.,\,
Smithfield, Virginia 23430
-S N ct: Non -compliant Swine Facilities
u je
Permit Number NC 0078344
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Urell:
Your NPDES permit number NCO078344 issued June 1, 1999 for the Tarheel Division facility, Special Condition A (5) requires
that the facility not purchase for processing any swine finished on a farm that has been finally assessed a Civil Penalty pursuant
to General Statute 143-215.6A for discharging animal waste to surface waters or wetland or overapplying waste. This
prohibition shall remain in effect for twelve months from the date of receipt of this letter.
The following farms have civil penalties finally assessed for discharging waste to waters of the state:
Jenkins Farm
FacilityBB:4T
Rt 1 Box 23
Woodland NC 27897
Brown's 7 & 8
Facility 52-42
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Smith Alderman
Facility 31-6
947 Powell Page Road
Rose Hill NC 28458
William James
Facility 31-36
2478 Lightwood Bridge Road
Wallace NC 28466
Warren Swine Farm
Facility 82-13
P. 0. Box 223
Newton Grove, NC
28366
Rose Swine Farm Faci I ity 82-101
481 Lassiter Road
Newton Grove, NC 28366
Previously Notified in May 30, 2000 Letter
Previously Notified in August 9, 2000 Letter
Previously Notified in August 9, 2000 Letter
Previously Notified in August 9, 2000 Letter
Previously Notified in September 18, 200D Letter
Previously Notified in September 18, 2000 Letter
Elden Hester Facility 9-45 Previously Notified in September 18, 2000 Lefter
8326 Center:Road,
Baldenboro, NC 28366
.0 'y
NCDEN
Customer Servioe Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
1 800 623-7-748

Carroll's # 2537 & 2538 Facility 82-466
P.0 Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Carroll's # 2546 Facility 82-464
P.0 Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Pork Plus Facility 82-25
P.0 Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Errol Quinn Farm Faci I ity 31 -101
218 J.B Stroud
Magnolia, NC 28453
Langley/Clover M -CA a=,Z4_ o
PO Box 215
Sharpsburg, NC 27878
AJ Huffman Facility 67-38
612 Barbee Rd
Richlands, NG 28474
Pork Chop #1 Facility 31-425
PO Box 267
Willard, NC 28478
Previously Notified in December 12, 2000 Letter
Previous.ly Notified in December 12, 2000 Letter
Previously Notified in December 12, 2000 Letter
Previously Notified in January 13, 2001 Letter
Added
Added
Added
If you have any questions regarding this notification please contact Jeff Poupart with the Non -Discharge Compliance and
Enforcement Unit at [phone] x527.
Sincerely,
Ker r T. Stevens
CC. Larry Johnson, Smithfield Foods
Non -discharge Compliance & Enforcement Unit
Wilmington Regional Off ice
Fayetteville Regional Office
Central files
NPDES Permit File
Washington Regional Office
4.,

DRAFT
FORm FRBD-1
9 130 A
Waste Structure Freeboard and Daily Precipitation Record'
Farm Owner 5e A., 4 1 Facility Numberl j -
Operator
,MV
Date
(mm/dd/yy)
"Waste Structure
Freeboard
*Precipitation
(inches)
r4 M---
I=V
Precipitation must be recorded daily. 01/13/2003
Lagoon freeboard must be recorded at least weekly.

i
�f
rmlo I
",006 (.7(7
CD

10
I
I
m
it
a on
.81
12

00 do
zt
N.
El
LM
... 101AMIm
f
!sill 1, 1
4" , ON
-k-
4A Li

Li
Jt%
fit!!

r
IL
� I
f\
dn
U I L,U m
R
IL
wit IS
ILI%
Z

�14CDA Ic WMSien 4300 Reedy
Czeek RftA. &!S*LNC. 27607-6465
L912) 733-2655
!Le� NO: W07282 W
Gmwer: jeuMns, Odly
Copies To: Wheelcr, Bill
434 Joe Brown Rd
Woodland, NC 27897
E)
Waste
A naiysis R Phort
'a -IV
Fann:
Wheeler, Bill
10 14 Lasker Golf Course RD
Jackson, NC 27845
3/16/04
Nordiampton County
Sam Pk info.
Wxwatm ReSWU
mifflou Mifts odmvise 9
�Mujft per . !Lejd
Sample M.
P K Ca N
S Fe A Z"
C"
B MO Gf C
TuUd
617
59.7 068- 125 28.5
24.3 3.22 0.41 1.10
0.23
0.92
IN -N
Waste Code:
-N?14
ARS
-NO3
Ni (,d pb
Al Se ji py
C.N DM% (:cE% AIE(&,d
144
T25
Dwwriptkw
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Lig.
Urea
Recommendations-
Nutricats AvaiWe for First Crop
Ms1IOM&qMnj
Odier Elements MOM I&=
Appkaffon Me"d
N P�D5
KA) Ca Mg S Fe M"
zn Cu B Mo Cj
Na
Ni Cd A Al Se Ii
Broaftast
2.6 0.80
5A 0.13 (1-17 0.14 OM 7
0.01 T 0.01
U

434 be Brow" Rd
WoodWd. NC 27897
Waste Anaiysis Report Cam"

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface
and/or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste
utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer
value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste
based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be
applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management
facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis,
This waste utilization plan. if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217
adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
i It

K
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, tons,etc.)
500 animals X 751 gal. waste/animal/year = 375,500 gals. waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
500 animals X 2.3 lbs. PAN/animallyear = 1160 lbs. PAN/year. (PAN from N. C. Tech, Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to
apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
applicatiow
ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Real
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs.N
Months
Type
Yld./Ac
per
Used
Applied
acre
595
6A
Craven
Fescue/
3.8
50
5 x 75%
712
Aug 1-
hay
July 31
7A
Craven
Fescue/
3.8
50
2 x 75%
285
Aug 1-
hay
July 31
7
Craven
Fescue/
3.8
50
3.5 x
499
Aug 1-
hay
75%
July 31
6
Craven
Cotton
600
.12
6 x 75%
324
Mar 15-
Aug 1
5
Craven
Cotton
600
.12
2 x 75%
108
Mar 15-
Aug 1
456
1
Craven
Cotton
600
12
11.9 X
642
Mar 15-
75%
Aug I
1
Craven
Small
50
11.9 X
446
Sept 1-
grain
75%
Mar3l
Total Table 22.8 3016
Total Needed
3016
Amount of N Produced 1150
Surplus or Deficit -1866
This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied,
they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrients or other elements.

. 4v
A "'q
"I., W*4;
VT$
4%
IT p,
oi4A, 4�� '4
�,,7,� e
%
jp%'.
I X-
ARM
4'
41"
..........
A4
OM%
%
.... 04,
*�;e
aq.
41
PK;
Vt
iA'l
6 41f,4

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application Appiication
No. Rate(In/Hr) Amount(In.)
6A
Craven
Fescue hay
C.4
1.0
7A
Craven
Fescue hay
0.4
1.0
7
Craven
Fescue hay
0.4
1.0
6
Craven
Cotton
.35
1.0
5
Craven
Cotton
.35
1.0
IT456 Fl
I Craven
I Cotton
.35
1 1.0
Ll _ ___
I Craven
I Sm grain
0. 4
1 1.0
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on
the average of once every 6 months, In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your
structure exceed Elevation 98,6,
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of Operation: Waste will be pumped on cotton, small grain and fescue for hay.

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of adequate,
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not
own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a
copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables
at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 ton per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at more
than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass
filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
Standard 393-Filter Strips)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and climate in N.C." for guidance.)
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control
odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.

9, Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to depth that would
prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste
should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm
shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and
any perennial stream or river other than an irrigation ditch or canal.
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standard
393-Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved
as a land applications site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste
applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates and in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation
such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected
regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.

18. If animal production at the facility is to be or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied
preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all
waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the
liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years and a liquid waste analysis
be taken at least twice each year consistent with waste utilization
plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application, Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years,
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.
61

WASTE UTILIZATION PLANAGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Dwight Jenkins
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know
that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or
construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe
than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of
the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Dwight Jenkins
Signature: —Date:
Technical Representative: Tony Short
Affiliatiom Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address Agency: P.0, Box 218
Jackson N.C. 27845
252
Signatu

I
SEP-07-04 12:49 PM BILL W HEELER 252 5992151 P.01
9/6/2004
Att, Buster Towe
PUA for Joseph Jenkins Fum

SEP-07-04 12:50 FM BILL W . HEELER 252 1 5392151 P.02
'"rLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
-Jkda &,*044
nty, /Ve.
Facility Nurnbor., CCU
Facility
Namt.— 4"C
Certified Operator Narne: 161-011
I , Current liquid Ievel(s) In Inc . h
lowest poInt on the top of thi
in the lagoon to the bottom of
I
4/4 ,zX /1 -1
Operator#_ .4
i as measured from the current liquid level In the lagoom to the
arn for lagoons without spillwak and ' from the current liquid level
ie spillway for lagoons with spi,11ways.
ra I Structure 2 Structure 3 S tructure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/identifier (10):
7—
Spillway (Yes or No)�
Level (inches):
2. Check all applicable Items I
� �desiqned structural freeboard elevations of one or more 3trtictures. Five
LIquIc level is wltNn the
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level Is within the 5 year 24 hour storm elevations fo I r one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attachel, Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste Is to bib pumped �and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in secUon III tables. lr�cluded within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with rel0ed facility number(s), number �cres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to tranIfff of waste
to a site not covered ln� the facility's certified animal waite management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, pro'Vide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility:
gin land application of waste: Or
1 Earliest poss)ble date to be 3 /V-, 061,Vf
I hereby certify that I have revilewedithe Information listed above and'includad within the attache Plan
of Action, a nd to the best of m y k no I �vledge and.ability, the Informailol n Is accurate and correct,
Facility OwnerIM
PoACoverPage 2/21/00
(print)
i
Phon914

SEP-07-04 12:50 PM BILL ' W HEELER 25 2 5392151 P.03
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIATi (30) DAY DRAW DOWN P�RIOD
I. T16TAL PAN TO BE LANE) Alp LIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE.
I . Structure Namelldentifisr (ID): dl
2. Current liquld volume In 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freebowd
a. current liquid level according to marker ( ir Inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard inches
c. line b - line a (inches In red zone) lnches
I I
d. top of dike surfacp' area according to design ;Z a 7 AC 2r
(area at below sir ctural freeboard elevation)
le, HWLc x line d x 7.48 gallon gallons
12 fe
3, Projected volurne of was le liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage-pedod according to structural de I sign
I TV — days
g. volume of waste p roduced according to structural design
I
.4 fr — 7?
h. actual waste prodbeed curmnt haWl x fln I e g =
1V
i certifled herd
I. volume of wash water according to structural deslO
III
J, excess rsInfall over evaporation according to desi JA
1 -7 V 'r.0 W
k. (lines Ill + I +I) x 7,
4, Total PAN to be land a �
p
1. current waste an
rn. 41.1aft a + h) x lin I
1000 1 1
30 day a
line f
during draw down period
dated
REPFArSECrION / FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SIrE
I I
PoA (30 Da�) V2110,3 i I
7 f1p
—.— gallons
lb/,*000 gal.
lb PAN

SEP-07-04 12:51 PM BILL WHEELER 252 5392151 P.04
.1 0
IIJ TAIM POUNDS OF PAN STO!RED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YR.124
HR. �'TORM STORAGE ELEVAYIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTORES FOR FACILITY
1. structure 10: line rn = It PAN
2. structure 11ne m = lb PAN
3. structure ID-,__ line m = 1b PAN
4. structure It): 11nem= 1b PAN
S. structure ID: line m - 1b PAN
e, structure line M 0 fb PAN
n, 11nes1+2*3+4+a 4 16 lb PAN
111. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAIINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. 00 NOT LIST FIELDS To WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLiss DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
0. tract
p. field #
q. CrO P
r. acres
9. remaining
I
IRR-2 -PAN
balanqe,� I
(Iblacre)
U
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
00
column r x s
u.
application
window'
-1-1, 7W
�#�- 4
4"
4 4-6
If
-7 1 -A
S,,,d044;
'aiaie current crop enuing vppiicauon� cais or next crop appication Degnning date for available re,.eiving
crops during 30 day drawn dowi p&l�d
v. Total PAN available fo all fields (sum of column t) 1b, PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00 2

SEP-07-04 12:51 PM BILL JHEELER 252 5392151 P.05
IV, FACILITY'$ PoA OVERALOAN BALANCE
t lb. PAN
w. total PAN to be land applied (line n froM Section 11)' =I
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (time v from section 111) M lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (Y� - x) a 1b. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
Including pump and haul, depopulation, hard reduction, atc. FDr pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate niw PAN based on new Information. If now fields are to be
Included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these flel�s to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN bala�ce. if animal waste Is to be haluled to another permitted
facility provide Information rega r1dIng the herd population an� lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility. ! 11 1�
NARRATIVE:
41�11
Of
q�- /Vt-* I dq4/
Z-0-7 -Z7,
4--21��
'11�/ -
.f/ $,-I e �
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 3

C. NN A 7Z�
0
,0'ZA'&n6-
September 10, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Joseph D. Jenkins
Route 1, Box 23
Woodland, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
27897
Subject: Notice of Violation
Permit No. AWS 660049
Jenkins Farm
Northampton County
Michael F Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary —
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E, Director
Division of Water Quality
The Raleigh Regional Office received a Plan of Action (POA) from Mr. Bill Wheeler your 01C dated
September 7, 2004. The POA indicated that your lagoon had 18 inches of available freeboard which is less
than the level required at your facility. The faxcd POA satisfies the reporting requirement stated in your
Permit.
Please note that the lack of adequate freeboard at your facility is a violation of your Certificate of Coverage
(COC) and General Permit, and as such may be subject to civil penalties of up to $ 25.000.00 per day.
Within ten days of your receipt of this Notice you should respond in writing with the following
information:
1. All land application records from January 1, 2004 to the present time'.
2. Freeboard records for the same time period.
3. Rainfall records from January 1, 2004 through the present.
4. A copy of your most current Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), and waste analysis.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should contact Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
SMYZi,mmernian, Supervisor
r
Aqui r Protection Section
Cc: Tony Short, Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Betsy Gerwig, RRO-DSWC
DWQ/Aquifer Protection Section Compliance Unit
RRO Files
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
ne
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 NoipfthCarofina
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet httPJ1h2o.enrstat9.nc,us Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Acdon Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consurner Paper

S.0
-.44
April 11,
2000
Mr. Kenneth Schuster. P.E.
Regional
Water Quality Supervisor
1628 mail
Srevice Center
I L---
Raleigh,
NC 27699-1628
Subject:
Notice of Violation
Jenkins Farm
Permit No. AWS660049
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
This letter is in reference to the February 24, 2000 site visit
by Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office. Mr. Towell
stated that he determined the waste lagoon had 16 inches of
available freeboard. Since pumping the lagoon on April 2, 2000,
the lagoon is well down and within compliance of the 19 inches.
We have been to the local Soil and Water Conservation office and
spoke with the specialist who updated our waste utilization plan.
This plan was mailed in with the General Permit. Tony Short of
NRCS has not had time to assist us with an 24-Hour Action plan as
yet. Tony stated that none of these plans had been done in
Northampton County. Please do not penalize me when technical
assistance is needed for this kind of plan. I would consider
this beyond my control as we do not have copies of what this plan
entails and the local NRCS office has not completed any plans for
the county.
According to Mr. Towell, we had 16 inches of freeboard. We were
not to go above 19 inches. That means we are getting a violation
for only 3 inches over. We feel that this is too severe. We are
following our waste management plan and our lagoon has not run
over and it has not run off the spray field.
Sincerely,
oseph D - J
L ns
Jenkins Hog Farm
#AWS660049

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
March 28, 2000
Mr. Joseph D. Jenkins
Route 1, Box 23
Woodland, North Carolina 27897
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Jenkins Farm
Permit No. AWS660049
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
On February 24, 2000, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted site visit at the subject swine facility. The purpose of the site visit was to
determine compliance with your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
freeboard requirements.
It was determined that your waste lagoon had 16 inches of available fireeboard.
Your lagoon is required to maintain a minimum freeboard of I foot plus the amount
equal to a 25 year\ 24 hour storm event. Your lagoon should maintain a minimum of
19 inches at all times to be considered in compliance with your Plan and General
Permit requirements.
Mr. Towell advised you to seek assistance from your local Soil and Water
Conservation District to help you develop a 24 hour Plan of Action (POA) to aid
you with the management of your waste lagoon. A phone conversation on March 2,
2000, with Mr: Tony Short, District Conservationist, revealed that you had not
contacted the District Office, and as of this writing the Raleigh Regional Office has
yet to receive a Plan of Action regarding your facitiy.
Please note that the lack of sufficient freeboard in your lagoon is considered a
violation of your Certified Animal Waste Mangement Plan and General Permit, and
as such, may be subject to civil penalties.
-1P -r
''r —'IS'
2 0 1 0
1628 MAIL SERVICK CIENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-162a
PMONE919-571-4700 FAX919-571:4718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% Pos-r-CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Joseph D.'Jenkins
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering an enforcement action againt you for the above
noted violations of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and General Prermit. If you
have justification that these violations were caused by circumstances or events beyond your
control you should include them with your writtun reSpons within fourteen days of receipt of
this Notice. Your response will be reviewed and forwarded to the Director for his consideration.
In the absence of any justification, the Director will proceed with the enforcement action.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice please contact Mr. Buster Towell at (919) 571 -
4700.
Sincerely,
ienneth SchQustcr. PE
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil & Water Conservation Distirict
Ms. Margaret O'Kefe, RRO_DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

I
Fast Track Freeboard NOV Checklist
Q�te_
time
Onsite -Rep Z"
Fqoc Llit)� Location ry p r 4 /o I-Dnn c4f v-
Name of Owner A 4 - 14.,
Address of Owner -Z3
C_
Name_of_Cert._0q�Latqr_____$.- �h'( t-, 4
TYp.e of Facility (sow, feeder to finish, etc.) ev
Number of animals onsite rD (7
Number of animals certified for v, D
Freeboard level
Notes:
.0 Cie "'t &
GO
0
8; J ke, mc 40
r, U'�' f Coe
r
ti,,94-t, s A?-� -r A0 0
"npeqo!�s�ig�at!�re
Date L� t y 4