660044_PERMIT FILE_20171231

► - t 4 JLjL. 07 ' 95 15: 41
945 P02
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTI OF MVIRON MEET, BEAT TH A NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF F.NVMOMCWTAL MANAGEKWT
Fayetteville Regional office
,)Y
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
-YYAs C '7- # - V)_ 1 11
y� �Z
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
'SECTION I
Animal Operation Type:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
SwA
SECTION II
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? (Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintaineb.
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL
MASTS MANAGEMENT PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
Y . i N I COMMID. TS
Ll

JUL 07 195 15:42
943 P03
SECTION iII
Field Site Management
1_ Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
C7RTIFICATIgB PLAN?
5. is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?.
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CKRTIFICATTON?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately )
8. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION IV
Comments
v
X I N I COMMENTS

7U'L-14-1995. 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRG P.02i02
' Site Requires Immediate Attcntior.-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEkA ITONS S 1TE VISITATION RECORD (96 _ y s-�
DATE: 7 ` rr - , 1995 N�
Ll If —
Time: �o
Farm Name/Owner: J'yti h 5 - S
Mailing Address: 13 0 >c Z 9 1 . , J''� �✓ ? _ �'✓ ? 7-
Counry:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: ,Z!Zs y)ei -r Phone: q/9 ; f l -/s6 s
Physical Address/Location: 5-4 %9 D
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �0 ° Number of Animals on Site: n d ri
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ - DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Laritude: Longitude: Elevation -
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6z� or No Actual Freeboard: _ :E Ft. .Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(~)? Yes o�N Was any erosion observed? Yes or. o
Is adequate land available for spray? YP or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No `
Crop(s) being utilized: !! 4. „--/r
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings:ems or No
100 Feet from Wells? (�i e or No
= e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oiEN
a., mal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lme? Yes oEN
'> animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
man-made deN ices? Yes or(o If Yes. Please Explain.
'kc5 inc facility maintain adequate waste nktnagernent records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray inigated on specific acmage with cover crop}:' Yes or No
Additional Comments: _t'di0 ID-0 A 4;,-
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.G2

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April27, 1998
John Sykes
John S. Sykes Farm
Rt 2 Box 297
Conway NC 27820
,;Wj
���, 2
f. •
! •
WOM%
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:
Dear John Sykes:
n
APR 2 910
illy
HNR WED! i2t�7E
Removal a gLstration-- ___-.--
-
Facility Number 66-44
Northampton County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of
Water Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste
management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000 JI
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
z&
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc. Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office
Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

DEC-15-97 MON 04 :09 PM MRCS JACI<SON NC
919 534 1906 P_01
. �w�,: r��•�. DS.. WC .A. nininl Feedlot i Operation
peration . Review xe
., '�'��'"�14bs i'3i` ��R`•l'�4i�`.5:.�,'."��?�'1i;,�8": k� •[] UWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection x 1��:"�"rst;,►:�
,
Roullne O (:om plaint 0 Folio w-up of UW Ins leeliolt O holluty-u) of I)Sl4`C rt!v#cw O Uthcr
F,)..k)C
or lnspectlimF'urilily Numlper of Irtspectiott c 24 fir. (Ith:mtn)
Tof11I 'I'Itile !in fracdotl or itoil rs
Form Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Pernffl (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent op Review
gCertlfiled ❑ Permitted or Insppec�tion(I(In~cludes travel and procesship)
IMNot U ,rrnl#cs„aI Date Lost Operated.• ............ram''' r�....�w`..`....... ................................................... ......,,.....».....,
Or
FurmNat tie:....... ? 7.?vvj.....,... 1 '1.......................... I' .,,.......,............... (;ottnty:.... � . �+�:.r....,.
Owner Name:., ...... a. l.'1i.f!" .......s.. ... 1...................:.. I................ ,... i'hnne Nr>:...,. � ,_ ,��- ...........
Facility Contact..... ��:`�.� ......................................'1'Itic:.,....... ............ ....::..... rl+oiiieNo.........»...... .......... I...... „ ....-.... •...
/sue .... .
&Iaill ng Address' ........... 4, . I- ? ........ Q "..x.. �g..�.l....... L,......�,..r(?,�?t�/Q'7:....»�C....,�. �.?t�»��. ............... ............... ..,.....
OnsileRepresentsilive:......................1.................................... ! ....................., lntcg otor'......».........., .............. ...................... ....
Certified Operntnr :..........................^........................................ ................... 01mrator Certiticallon Number:...................,.................
(.oration of Farn,:
Lafitucle 'a ' l• l _. " = t.ungitllslr �_ _�* ��_ jj I III
Type of Operatlon Ilecfgn Current
Swine ' - Calincify Population
it) Feeder
eder to Finish
rean
rrow to Wet,nrrow
to Fecdcr
rrow to Finish
❑ Other
Design ~ Cttrrenl � ; Design '- Current '
Poultry Cnp:tcity. Population.. Cattle Capacity, Population
�
0 Layer ? Dairy
❑ Non-L,1 crU Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW.
Nu, roper of Lagoons i I lalding fonds Silbsurface Urnins l'reseiit l.agna 3 Area^ Spray Fletd Area'
iybdcv4VAW<.Yifatltlll�..!i#'.4H-•r`.{.A•.V.W+..M.'.S1M1' y�� ' ! i -Yit.
�.'.na•.*t•a.,.. vrr..au..rr +i. .alrsrrt .a �..�laHt,.ia.sw,.w.a t k + ,w.t",r c '! ` r..
]-Are there 1y' buffers t�1at need rrpaintenaticcl�mproven,ent? d Yes � �No
2.' is any diecli'i observed front any part of the operatton7 i ❑ Yes No =
Di-wharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Meld. ❑ Othcr
a. Irdixchargo is observed, was the conveyance nan-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
• I
b. If iliScillrge is obscrveil, did'iircich Snrfuee 1ti'tlter'i (If yec. notify DWQ}
c• if discllntge is ol )served. what is die esli,nated Ilow in gal/nlin?
I
D Yes ` E3 No
-,Jr. Dnec t)ischar c bypasx a la non .Meth? .If es. ticitil Dw
E� Yts ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past dlschir a from i+ Ff _an art orthe�
a ranon�
'..r.,•°�i'�,�`rr,:�i',a>i�".�siuT'-sew?ni*Kss •+@i+rntHn.�vuar'> — �,,.,.__.... ,.
.:ik ..4 .atr�"�;.,; ;a f-...
�soahers: any adverse ilntpacic to the wa[cri of Ilia Statt other tiiin horn a discharge? ❑
5:-' Dora a,iy hart a ti,e rwa<le 111111a?cInenl system (other d1a❑ ligotinslh)ldltig (pond,, rcywrc >t
4 F:: �: ..., _.._.. �. .�..�.:,:..:�.:w __� �ti; :��"...,;��:: ni:►irttcnxnce/improvetnent?
0 1
c. s...'' O No& ;4�.��_r i
rhwid oil bas i

DEC_1 97 MON 04:09 PM NRCS JACKSON NC 919 534 1806 P•02
..tcility Number; --
6. is facility not in compl ianco with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? �fea �10
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible) charge?
gyps
[] No
8. Are there lagoons or storage patxls -on „site which need to be properly closed?
i
❑ Yes
No
Structures rr pyoori% at Vur 11r tin
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Ayes
VNo
l:recboard (ft); Structure t Structure.2 Structure 3 Structure a
:p...........
Stmclure S
Structure 6
................ ....... ... ,f.`...... .......... ......................... .............. _.._..,.». ...»»��
10. Is seepage observed from any of lk structures?
........_...� ............,.»._.
:. ❑ Yes
.».._...
1a
11. Is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[] Yes
9Na
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
_ -
- _ Yea
❑ No.. !
(if any of questlnns 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
�
an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any, of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
}jFasic Ann) ratio-
14. lc there physical evidence of over application?
a ❑ Yes
KNo, j
' (if in excess of WMP, or runoffentering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type ................. ....I........./Y,dZ! .... »....................... .................. ...............,. ................... ...... ...... ................
...._.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)?::v,p �<r­ d Yes
[(No''
i7: Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
; No
[]Yes
1$. Does the receiving crop need improvement?...- • : -.- - - -
- 0 Yes T No
-19: is there a lack of available waate application equipment?
[] Yes No
20: Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yea
allo
21. Did Reviewerfinspector fail to di%gss review/inspection with
on -site representative?
it Yes
KNo
IFn l lied Epelliflej Q111V
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
:.: is Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[] Yes
❑ No
24.- Does record keeping need improvement?
OYes°•
1] No
c6iiiiii0mi (idaIt! 466ijoii If)C-110tilti hiry;YES'.1;iigiver+i`AtidloiP wi#
x
��� ilrsi�tiigs��i!' «clllty,iti. tidier-�xplalt� slit)itllb�ii�.�ti�e.�iiii(liieirigl'�fA��: •tam.,
..y;' •;4-: fig' :':b'f.i'. xi ;.,! a
iyi
`.
�..�`'�....���.'�4'1 r
i1.#�'+G�s"err:.��.."Ski.`!�tv:G-,�?s-�.S�..�'as?._:.;,-r :.�.:s-�w'�='� ;;:a.i���*'�`� f"""{..,a�.� .�:??�•:d�'}+d��'�.�`"*�.�
....... a.P•.� .,.Y�R'-4..L�sGi�:::�i��:?n..fd.��•F.:`:4:1'r`A.+N{"irs`Y�.•s`[`.`.:..rF'I`.+�'•.VZ•r..riA"a+san
-,�.� fir• 1 _ .• - - �,.: y 4E.s4-� �7.c. y.4>., a .aC� �e-,e7rvi %��Y�i�!^s�
Ins' :.. ,_ - -: -; �, •. •; `': .. 'b r..f r.`.�4'i.•�♦1Ka•':I - � 5• l �.
IaS�VC Animal i<eedlot i ���►
• •;,,� �erZtirtn Itr+vi

----- ...... ... _.
❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
©11_W__Q Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
IMtoutine O C'[mi-plaltlt O F))llt) v u of i)�V ills L tioii Q follow-n of D.sWc review O Othiurunnuaa�uun�
Facility Number Date of Inspection ril r k�
Time of Inspection �, 24 hr. (hh•mm)
egistered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted of Operational Date Last Operated: ! f3......
Farm Name: J.d,l�Yt �Y./� j 65 -9- Countv:..... �..'� f w ..............................
-......../......................................... ...................................................... . Q Q.... J
Owner Name......,.1..k./T.'. SY.f1�.r. Phone No ! 7 J ��11� li� �......................
.............................................................................. ...................
FacilityContact S)1?4-• rifle: Phone No .....
................................................
qq Mailing Address:......... L
.. . ....... ...1........1�7.-M.('..,ay........... &.-,L............ ............ I............................ .........................
Onsite Representative:.. 4..'-A....... Integra tor:..�!�................. .................
Certified Operator; ............. `..................... ....................... ..... Operator Certification Number:..................................
Location of Farm: 5 /Z,
rr
t.__........................................................................._....................--..............................................................-..................................................................................................� — r
Latitude Longitude �• �` �" "' _."'.
Design Current Design Current Design Currents_ ..•
Swine Capacity:,• Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gifts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Nun er of tlagao / Holding Ponds ®' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge odoinated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If dischary is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
G. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes 0 o ,.
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes alNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZN49
❑ Yes W
El Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

F'acj4ty Nupber: — L
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'' ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons,ftolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure'3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
I........
..................................................................... .................................... ........................... I....... ....... I...........................
Freeboard(fty.......VIZ. ! Lt.........................................................
..........................
Id. Is seepage observed fromany of the structures'?
❑ Yes
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
L�'No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?❑
Yes
o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Waste Application
:;0
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(If in excess of WrM/P,�, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 4>i 1, ... h. .. 1A..........................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Pla (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
O No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�V
E1<0o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,[3<0
0
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
El Yes
�Id
L�"No
For Certified or_Perrnilled Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Wer y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No.vio loons or. deticiencie's. we're noted during this.visit.- .You.4411 receive• no ftirth:er
correspondence about this.visit::.. , ; :. ..... •.. :. :....'.....:.
Comments (refer to question #): ExIiW a'ny YES answers and/dr any recommendations at anyother eomments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (uuse addttuinal pages as necessary} .. �.. 4 . .
7�r.. T� 2.12.D rn--t1 re!cvw�..-�
J
r �• 01*4 I l =ryc�,_ � ol-r� �a b qj-e- -
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tsef� Gam, �/ Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
John Sykes
John S. Sykes Farm
Rt 2 Box 297
Conway NC 27820
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: John S. Sykes Farm
Facility ID#: 66-44
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Sykes:
®F_=HNF-Z
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O, Box 27687, Nf
v��
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` • •
Raleigh Regional Office
MOM
James B. Hunt, w , Secrnoretary ID e
Ik
Jonathan B. Howes, Secrets C
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
September 12, 1995
Mr. John Sykes
Route 2, Box 297
Conway, North Carolina 27820
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Sykes Swine Operation
SR 1909 Northampton County
Dear Mr. Sykes:
On July 11, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste
collection/disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state,
nor were any manmade conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. As a result, your facility was
found to be in compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to the surface waters
of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and
may also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an a2proved animal waste
management plan in place by December 1997. This plan must be
Certified by either a designated technical specialist or a
professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical
specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you
should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
office.
3800 Barrett Drive. Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycles!/ 10%post-consumer paper

.J
Mr. John Sykes
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
cc: Northampton County Health
Northampton Soil and Water
Pat Hooper--DSWC, WARO
RRO File Copy
Sincerely,
Ju y E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
Department
Conservation District

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM Dal WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attention. _
r/ Facility No. 6 - Y
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT G6 - yS
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: � - // , 1995
Time: G 0 v
Farm Name/Owner:_Jr04 n S ' -5 y X(;
Mailing Address: % Z 13 d X 7 -7
7
County: 0 r j t1 Q
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative:1zs s Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
I
c ,
Type of OQcration: Swine ,� I'ouitry Y_ Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: 9 1-
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' . Longitude: Elevation:
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxirnam)v 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6s or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes q& Was any erosion observed? Yes or _No
Is adequate land available for spray?- Y or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No ` ? —
Crop(s) being utilized: 1L4 aI l,4
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings.k*s or No
100 Feet from Wells? 1�10_ or No
_�te animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strram? Yes oo
ardmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes 4!o
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man -trade ditch, flushing system, or other
;ir^fla_- man-made deNices? Yes or(O 1f Y=s. Please Expl.tirt.
14 Ks trio facility maintain adequate waste tuattagerncztt records (volumes of manure, land apphtd-
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: , „ -0 � � D /- - X � 14'7
Sigrialwe
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P-022

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources .�
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C) E H N R
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Boyce A, Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
September 12, 1995
Mr. John Sykes
Route 2, Box 297
Conway, North Carolina 27820
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Sykes Swine Operation
SR 1909 Northampton County
Dear Mr. Sykes:
On July 11, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste
collection/disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state,
nor were any manmade conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) observed. As a result, your facility was
found to be in compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to the surface waters
of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and
may also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan in place by December 1997. This plan must be
Certified by either a designated technical specialist or a
professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical
specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you
should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10`?; post -consumer paper

Mr. John Sykes
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy S. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper--DSWC, WARO
RRO file Copy

Inactive Lagooi-i E`-aluation Form
a er C r
Uiv' n of Sail and ' nservat'on
ivision of Wate •Qu ir4 . ._: . �: ...
Initial Evaluation Q 1=uliow-up Evaluation © Denied .access ❑ Does facility Require a Follu11-up
3 I Date af' lvolu-micut I
�Facilitv Number�"
of, 11"aloatinn b 24 �tr. {hh:;nm;
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified Registered ❑ Nun-Kegivvred tractive Facilityl A:�tc Lust Operated:
Farm Nume: ...,....s `,./le.:f.................... .. ..........................
Owner Name: ............. � .... \.< .S Phone No,,_...............................................................................
FncilitT Con tact : ............ ................................... ............. ................Title,
................ .................,.........,......... .......... Phone No: .............................. ................
MailingAddress: ....... ___ ...................................................................................... ............................... __.................... ............. .............................. .................. .
Onsite Representsctive:.............................................................,...,.......I............................ Integratur:....
Location of Furm:
Design Current
❑ Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wear. ect
G Fee , _--;zash
❑ Farzw .c Wean
�
❑ Far-.zw tc Feeder
❑ Farrcw :c Fir;sh
❑ G:Jt-
C Boa:>
f
Design Current Design t_ui rent
0 Poultry Canaciry Po ulation ❑ Cattle Capacity Po ulation
,
,❑ Laver ❑
❑ worn -+-aver ' ❑o: Da:r. I
a0t`e'
:Total benign Capacity :.
TbtaI:SSLW
:�Number•of.Lagoons ---Z----
Number of -Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Ditichartie� 8: Stream Tm acts
,. Is Any d:;c'-.z-_e obser,'cd from any lagoon?`. s
a. If dkchargc is was the -an-made' f! `' N
b. If Qt's aowr'e'd. aid :t tez_- s .T ..,.. Sma e? (If yes, DEA'Q)
c. It discnarnc :S l ^tiCr':�'j, -hat is Ir)
Is thcrc epic .. _ cfpast dischBrgc fr,,:r an:. lagoon?
Waste Collection & 'rreolment
Asti ate . , _c''oard Lever
SQ-UL',ure Slrac; rc: 2 St.- 5tE, c 5
Revieµ'er.'Inspector Name
Reviewer.'Insnector Signature: Date:
ILE"

vul:., ,
3311
0-J

1ea G. 0 ti Uwe -ON DISC�"4^C.7G
Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
acility Number: �• Cf
Latitude W .
4, Vvaste Last Added (mm/vy)
Inactive Lagoon Number;
P " G - U, .. _
A-9
Longitude U1. � '[�T" ❑ G1'S LI yAap
[:]Owner ❑ Estimated
5, F,'tlmate of lagoon, surface area (acres) G
/j
6, Effective height of embankment (feet)
7. Distance to B:ue Line or Intermittent Stream (feet) H/,K�—'
❑ Determined From Field Measurement ❑ Map
❑ < 250 ❑ 250 - 1000 r> I 000 j
8. Down Gradient Well
a. Is these a dow;1 gradient we',l located within 250 fee:? =Ye ; `o
b. Is an i-tervening stream trot located between any part of the ;agoen and the nearer: we'F' ❑Yes ❑ \0
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW (mi,) ❑ < 5 ❑ 5 - 10 [] > 10
10. Does the representative know of overtopping from ou:stce waters? ❑ Yes ❑ Rio ❑ t 2k—nown
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Siudee Near Surface
b, Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
12. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc,
b. Const:nction Specification Unknown But Darn Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current MRCS Standards
13. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
14. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soli, Rock Outcrops Present, e:c.
b. No Liner, Sail Appears to Have Low Permeabillty
c. Mee,s ti`RCS Liner Requirements
15, Application Equipment a,-Id/of Sprayfield Not Availabie
16. Contact eouid not be made with on -site representative
C
C
!❑ Yes L] So nkno%vn
❑ Ycs o

` , J hw,
/ P
.nments (Refer to Question f'): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
ILF'DS