660038_PERMIT FILE_20171231

N
NURTH C) ROLINA
Department of Environmental OM

pF-
LIM

4

M E M 0 R A N D U M
April 29, 1996
To: John Holley, Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
From: Buster Towell, Environmental TechnicianAi—
Subject; Tom Hollowell Swine Farm\Northampton County
on March 26, 1996, an inspection was conducted at the above
referenced swine operation located on SR 1300 near the junction of
SR 1328 (Mt Zion Church Rd.) in Northampton County.
The facility had adequate. freeboard due to the fact that the
lagoon had recently been pumped and was rated as compliant with the
NCAC .0217 regulations. There was however a potential problem
noted with what appeared to be lagoon seepage due to burrowing
rodent activity.
With this MEMO the RRO Water Quality Section requests that someone
with.:,,your Section evaluate the situation and possibly make
recommendations to the land owner.
Please find attached copies of photos taken on the subject
inspection date, a location map, and the names and addresses of the
land.owner.
If you need.additional information please see Buster Towell.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Ed Tom Hollowell Jr.
Hollowell Farm
Rt I Box 182
Seaboard NC 27876
Dear Ed Tom Hollowell Jr.:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATUR;kL.1,RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 1 f /I � i I
JA N
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 66�.ig—_-�
-N&r-
t�a_mpton.C&u-kty-
j
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites., This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR.2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any Staie Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Si e
TIC
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

W-TUL 07 .. 195 1 5:41 943 P02
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEA TH & NATWIAI, RESOURCES
DIVISION Or ENVIRONIMiTAL MANAGEPB24T
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal operation Compliance Inspection Form
7 we,
.. .. .............. ..
All questions an wered negatively will be. discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enahle the deemed Parmittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SEMON I
Animal Optration Ty-pe:
Horses, cattle, swine,
SECTION 11
poultry, or sheep
5�' -'�' Y-
1� Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. A -re animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a �TIFM ANIMAL
WTH MANAGEKENT PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum.
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
Y I N I CONNMWS
0 L?

MUL 0?.."3515:42
943 P03
SECTION 3:11
Field Site Management
1. is a-nimal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
map Blue Line Stream?
is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS map
Blue Line Stream?
3, Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CMTIFICATION PLAN?
5. is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATTOW.
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
f ri��eboard? How much? (Approximately -6.1,n 4 )
8. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SE=ION IV
Comments
041N
fY__O bA';� I
U11- �""" /� .5-: j ,
cj'�" , C-C 74_1`0
':k�

a
0 ivision -,Operation Review
of Soii and Water Conservation
Dv siond �oll and Water Conservation Compliance Inspection
Di
cibivisiolilof Water Quality - Cotnpliaike� Inspection
,genFy - Operation Review
Routine-- 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW2inseection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Date OC InSpecdOn
Facilitv Number Time ofInspectimi 24 hr. (hh:mn)
13 Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not 01)eraFti(.)n.,l ,Date Last Operated: ..........................
Count f
FarmName . ................................................................................................... .......................... _u .. .......................
OwnerName . ................................................... ....................................... .......... ................... Phone No: .......................................................................................
FacilitvContact: ................ ............................................ ................ I itle . .................. Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ............................................................................................. ........................ ........................................................... . ........................ ..........................
....... I ....... Integrator: ....................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ........... ...............
Certified Operator: ................................................... ........................................................... - Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latittide 0 4 .4 Longitu&
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
* Wean to Feeder 10 Laycr I I N:5airy I I
* Feeder to Finish JE] Non -Layer I I LCINon-Dairyl
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
Farrow to Finish Totai Design Capacity
El Gilts
Total SSLW
Boars EE
Number of Lagoons =_S"surface Drains Present 1101,agoonArea jE1SprayFie1dA_rea]
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 1[1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges �& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge ori gina led at: CjLagoon
E] Spray Field Fj Other
n
a. Udischarce is observed, was the conveyance man- i�
h. If discharge is ohservcd, did it rcach Wmer oftlic State*.' ([fyes, notiCy DWQ)
c. 1fdischarLe is observed. what is [lie estimated flow in gathnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systcni'? (I i'vcs, notily DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm stural-e) less than adequate'? El Spillway
SMIC1111-C I Siructurc2l Struciurc 3 SWUCIurc 4 StRlCturu 5
Ideritil'icr:
Cl Yes 0 No
El Yes No
El Yes No
D Yes No
El Yes No
E] Yes ��No
Az.
MY es XNo
StrUCtUrc 6
Fi-coboard (inclies): ........ . �L- I ................ . ........................ ­­ ....... ............................ ...... I ............ I ............... ...........
5. Are thcre any immediate threats to the integrity ofany of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, F1 Yes No
seepave. etc.
3/23/99 conlinm 11back

rFAacifity Number..
Are there structures on -site whi
closure plan?
(If any of
immedia
7. Do any of the structures need m
S. Does any pail ol'the waste man
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that neec
11. Is there evidence of over appli
12. Crop type re_-5 C- �/ '5
13. Do the receiving crops differ
14. a) Does the facility lack adequ
b) Does the facility need a wet
c) This facility is pended for a
15. Does the receiving crop need
16. Is there a lack of adequate wa
Reauired Records & Document,;
Date ol'Inspection
ch are not properly addressed and/or ni,,inagcd through a waste management or
Yes
. No
0
questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
te public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
aintenance/improvement?
21�cs
No
agement system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
UNO
gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
El Yes
P No
maintenance/improvement?
0 Yes
Ff No
cation? Excessive Ponding El PAN
E] Yes
No
with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? C1 Yes
No
ate acreage for land application?
Yes
No
table acre determination?
Yes
No
wettabie acre detcrin i nation?
OYes
No
improvement?
0 Yes
VNo
st c application equipment?
[I Yes
�D No
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
El Yes
EYNo
T
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, e1c.)
El Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
E? No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ ofernergency situations.as required by General Permit?
Yes
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
El
23,
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
C1 Yes
V! No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
[2-No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
E] Yes
VNO
�'04a' fi6f'is' '0' i" d' �'flc'ie':n' 6LA'9 'n' bie'd' d' titift. . . . . . . . . . . . . . � ti6­6 tit h' i� e
g 4iiis'visit' YotkWill tebO*c
...... ............
.... ....... .................
n, any, i wg
Explai YES answers aid/ th Wi'olifi'm­e' �iits`
questiorr n, or any recommen a ions;or,anyt,o
"K<R 743 z 11�'j
j
Use:drawinj��!of fb[ flitfto1&tir exp ain situations. (use additional pag�'s�a' �nec'e'ssa'j
AIOL) U 6- 7_4 r?,v Xj C_ C) 'U 6 /'v GfJ I
,&:f fi-5 J*7 19A.r- 6,k) tC.4 �,V Ttj
_y 4v M 67V
C, /_5 V07- 1,eV /44- /,0 11fe
/Z e L1Cf-L.e7f> C 1!5 J/U �V L,/ le3 /0 E_E_�O V O� �77 112le , t,4,, F-v OW
/ -we VL,6/19 —
e-�_ 0 t zt 10 C-Ft_tEZT- /'5 ruxe
44 /*t P441v-T :5,t5rwn co, T,-�, 40g,(_ JA
Reviewer/Inspector Name
qft
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: V-7/1' -9

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR
Facility Number
Farm Name:
On -Site Representative:- CZ- , 7,
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: A, oecErr_
Date of site visit- !�� / 2 /1�
MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
flyp 1,4;
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: � �6 015- pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #61�ard-hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system-, 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
vi I � /V �- �LVL�p 10 f /1't, r R -( /? /t/4 /U �
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
0�9 1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE. /rj
)A kA�o -F pr �_j —fA/,j 6) A�
Cp j w e-
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, inclu)-ing map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PEIV,01.,Oe, le,01W C m
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination #- f-V "0
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

J!'. 13 Divisio oil and Water.-C'o"�n'-s'e'r,"Y-iiti'on'-:.Operation,Re'
vlew L
13 r,
nserva ow � 'Comp ance� nspec iQn�,� 'r:�
.0 oh"
D! ton S an a er; C6­ ad
afio`-� Complia&6 tln�pe�do
`4- 1 %�,.-'Wlvlsion of.wke�r',Qlp
-1� �j qq�
r g�ney"-':0"' i Mew
wothie 'A
P
2:11outine OComplaint 0 Foll(!!1:2"of DWQ inspection OFollow-upofDSWC review 00ther
Facility Number Date ofInspection
Time oC Inspeclion L4il2Q__j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 10 Not Opera= Date Last Operated: ..........................
[3 Permitted PIK'r't tiorlal
ame: ... T county: J*r'
Farm N. ............. .................................. +M9A'V0711.V."`.%� ................ .... ...................
................... r...
Owner Name: Phone No 7_5"'? ..... -5-iv -
............ ­11.1 ............ I ................................................ .... ...... ­­' ....... I ... I—— .. ......... ...............
FacilityContact . ........ 15. ........................... Title: ............ L­­ ... .......................... Phone No . ...................................................
Mailing Address: ...... ".kaac.4L ....... ............. .................
Onsite Representative: ... T&A! ................. ................. I t I t eg. ra t o r: ......... ..............................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ................ L.­ ........ I ...........
Lociition of Farm: �� 12-- 11 0­0
................ I ............... I ................................ I .................... ..................................................................................................................... I ............................. 11 ...............................
.............................. ....... ................ L ......... I .....................................................................................................
J_
Latitude Longitude
D' esign
;
Currenv"'' ��'De'sft­n'.,,. -Curi6t
D sign CdHent;� JF
';.e
2,
'S,Mne
il�j apacity
a
Population �Capkity Popu ati6n Cattle
-Capacity Poptilatibii
Wc��eeder
Layer �-F[:] Dairy
L eder to Finish—
-Layer -Dairy
El Non [;LNon
14
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Other
OF arrow to Finish
uwi besi C
0 Gilts,
Q
'y
�rs
B a
0 Boars
0
1 J:.%�
" " 1 .1 , ��?:� "Total $SL W
11, r:A
Ir7l La2oinn Area Spray Fie
Subsurface Drains Present
1�1?ldifizfonds/ Solid Traps
n JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field 0 Other
a. It' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b, If dischwge is observed; did it reach Water of' the State? (Ifycs, notify DWQ)
c. If'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon systern? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Siructure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Yes awo�
Yes No
El Yes No
0 Yes Ej"No
El Yes 0
El Yes o/
I
[I Yes RNo
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ......... Lill .. ........... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued

Pacild; Number- & — -12 Date offrispuction.
6. Are there structures on-sile which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? El Yes WN__�o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public hi�alth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
No
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes
8. Does any part of the waste management System other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? El Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 0 Yes
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need main ten ance/improvement? C3 Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding [:] PAN El Yes 0
12. Croptype
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? E] Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? El Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? El Yes 7No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? [-] Yes No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facjuity'require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, WXe any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.......................................................
........... . .....
.... ................................
'Cori�s�6fidei 'e'abi kth' ' is't""
111C OU ISY I ........
1,� J­i'1i.f,4.),`,1"."
e:,d.i.,aWiii&.of'fii;,-,ility,:Cd,b6ttif,,'O-xp ifinisituiations. use a Y, : �,:4� �Mj lill,
1A 'j 4�
k4-4oa-� LA-qd /W fzc-o-dj- )-w_ me�
El Yes
Y es ��No
Yes � �No
0 Yes 2<0,
Yes VO
Yes �0
No,
El Yes
Yes
Yes No
A.
3/23/99

Facility Number: Dateof Inspection
Odor Issties
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atfor below O-Y-�CO No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? El Yes 211�<o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, Yes 0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? Yes No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc,) El Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Yes jNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes 0
o
... . . ing �': - n' "­ , "�P- - "'mq
'AddifionW Cciinhients:Aiid/or'Draw s. f - � � �-' I "i �
F
A.
3/23199

El DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
0 DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Foilow-ue of DWQ in�eection 0 Follo!!�u of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection r771 �/g ge
r--r�
Facility Number Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction ot'hours
Farm Status: []Registered [3Applied for Permit I ex: 1.25 for I hr 15 min't) Spent on Reviejv
[] Certified Permitted or Inspection (includes traveland processing)
113 Not Oper Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
FarmName: qn.). . ............ 11 .................................................................... County: ... ...... .......................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No: .......................................................................................
FacilitVContact: ............................................................................... Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailin-.Xddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
L,
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... ....................................
I
Certified Operator .................................................. ......... I ........................................... Operator Cca-lification Number: .........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 4 66 Longitude 0 6 41
of Operation:,, D C
�jne,,P�., ity.,APopit afid
Wean to Feeder
,I'Feeder to Finish
7vx
Farrow to Wean
E] Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other
. .. . ..... .
-CurriM
-�f'.�Current. �,Destgn
gh .. .... .... .. .
try,., vao i Pop Ipti
C city'.�Poi)ulati6n.....,��eattle.,:. ic tv 4
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharoe ori-inated at: 0 Lagoon 0 Spray Field El Other
a. lfdischar,-,e is observed, was the conveyance mun-niade'!
b. Ifdischarge isobserved,diditreach SurfaceWater'� (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharoe is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin,�
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system" (If yes. notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharlTe from any part of the operation'?
t7
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
c�
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than larroons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/iniprovement'!
El Yes ONO
0 Yes 0 No
C1 Yes EGNo
El Yes iNo
Yes VNo
Yes No
Yes No
D Yes 0 No
Continued on back

. . It A
Facility Numbe
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
—9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
).q ..................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ­ ..........................
Freeboard. (ft): ............... 1.�� ........... ..................... I .... ......... ... 11 .............................. ............. 11 .......... I .......... ........................... ...
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type . . .................................................................................................. .............................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Unly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available.
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Pern-Lit?
0
Yes F No
El Yes 0 No
Structure 6
... ....................................
El Yes �Ij 0
El Yes VNO
yO re e ve n6ftirihe'
No'vio'la'tio'n's-or'de'rfciehc'i'es.'w'e'r'e-'n'ot'ed, during this'Visit. 11,"viill '6 f ' -' r,'
.............
.............. ..........
Ofr0spi)fideh6� A4oiit .(his'viAt'.-'-".
�O Yes El No
C1 Yes Vj No
El Yes ko
El Yes Vf No
El Yes 16 No
Vyes 4S&
El Yes Ef No
El Yes E5 No
Yes 0 No
El Yes 4� No
Cl Yes ?"No
C-1 Yes 7 No
0 Yes I�No
'CO,
MW
E-,, C)
LIC ) . 71
5infil"t, 1�441/v
T7) fi-M/4,9-A40 PA-Al-0 _S/4)66 -VJ 410 A G
7/25/97
"WRR
Reviewer/Ins
pector Name
. . .......
. ... ... . . ..
Reviewer/[ nspector Signature Date:
I :� F__4 - -

C�A sh. ?
E3 Diywon of Soil and Water Conservation E3 Other Agency
. ivision of Water Quality
tO Routine 0 Coniolaint 0 Follow-up'of DNVQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of lnsp,0ion
Facility Numbe
-Time of Inspection ��24hr.(hh:m
13 Registered rtified 13 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 1[3
Not Opera
Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: ....... 0,:�/ ...... .............................................. ................
County: .......... ...................
OwnerName . ....... zi.�� .... z", &W 4 ....... "I'l""16"1"11161l,""""""""I
_571
Phone No- ............... I ................ ........................
FacilityContact: ....... e . .................................... .... Title: ...... ....... .................................................
Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: .... . ............ I .... .... ......... . .......
7. iZZ'
............. ..... . . ........................ ..........
Onsite Representative: ..... 7�.��Z ......................
............... ............... ..........
Ceirtified Operator ......... ....... . ........ .... .... ....................... ........ ..........
Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm: �2
................................ ....... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude
C u.rrent..'
sign! urren Design..'-2: s: 0
IX . . . . .. . .. " ", ��* ' �3� "'
C t AP
wine: city P
apa opulatio Poult
10 , . 'ry
'C
'a pack� attle
P. ion
c opulad
Ca`:p`�i t�
We to Feeder
bll
.IEI
Layer
Dairy
ceder to Finish
eder tc
EIN'on-Layer
L
L
Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
JE3 Other I
El Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
%%V
�M.
Total Design,tapaci.r.
El Gilts
'J
0 Boars
4 'ATotASSLW_
------- -- - w,
i,, Nu . m': 6e: r: o ag . o .. o :. ..: s'i,,HqIding,,Ponds
Subsurface Drains PreseEnt
10 Lagoon Area
10 Spray Field Area
id Waste Management System
4
General
1; Are there any buffer's that need maintenance/improvement? Cl Yes 2<10,
7
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes UNo
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon' El Spray Field El Other
a. Udischarge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes [3
b. If discharge is obse . rved, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes., notify DWQ) 0 Yes 7No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
N
d. Does discha�gc bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes dz
-1 Yes G
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Ld
4. Were there any adverse impacts to'the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes Z.
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes rN o.
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with.any applicable setback criteria in' effect at the time of design? Yes
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Yes No
7/25/9.7 Continued on back

lFa6%y Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Cl Yes 6�1�0'
Structures (La u oon,,, Hol ding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Yes pl�co
StrUCtUre I Structui"-e 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
............................ ..... ................................... ..................... 0 .............. .... 0 .............................. ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(ft): ........ ............ .................. ................. ................................... .................................... ..............
M Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/irnprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'!
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
A.M15. Crop type ...... .............. ............... ......... ...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in theYnimal Waste Management Plan (AWMII)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewerfinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'!
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were anyadditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. )Yxfe any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'!
........... ............ Y.- ......
13 US 0
0 Yes 'No
Yes 140
No.violafflo'ns' or'de'ficiencies.w'ere'-n'o'ted during this.'visit.-You will re'cei've 'no fu'rther
Ofr&pbfideno�� �4oiit
OYes [�No
0 Yes No
; �i
.............................................
Yes [?11�0�,
Yes ;f ,
Yes �o
Yes [;,(O'Z",
El Yes
C] Yes N
F� Yes �N 0
0 Yes VN91
El Yes
0
Yes 0 No
1—ommentsjrefer to, question lfl: Explam,any YES answers and/or anv recommendations oranylother::.Commenm
N'kuiatio'ns.'�u`s'i_e H'dd1ii'&n-a:Fp­ai.'g` e's�'a­s'
h I
7/25197
MO,
Reviewer/inspector Name ( V� , C; " " - . A- tf
le' �'i
Reviewer/Inspect or Signature: Date: �T/

Facility Number: --
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 2-9- Y&I
Time: s-7�
Farm Name: -,rc> i -Jo i>we_� County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
One Site Representative: TO k-, 14-o Integrator: ty, q - 5
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location S& /.>G, 6
LLatitude: Longitude:
Operation Description: (based an design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Mow CLayer DDairy
ONursery ONon-Layer oseet
oFe'eder
Other Type of LMmtock-.— Number of Animals:
Number of I_agoons:__L(induie in tm DnWnge and Oboeivabons the treaboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inpection: I -j
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes 0 No 0
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes 0 No 13
Is erosion observed?: Yes 0 No 13
Is any discharge observed?: Yes 0 No 13
0 Man-made 0 Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?, Yes 0 No 0
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes El No 0
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:

Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Yes 0 No 0
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?: Yes 0 No, 11
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Strearn?: Yes 13 No 0
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?: Yes 0 No 0
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes 0 No 0
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes 0 No 0
Does record keeping need improvement?: Yes 0 No 13
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?-. Yes 0 No 0
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature: -- — Date:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or Observations:
AOWanuary 17, 1996
0
Use Attachments if Needed

Facility Number--7
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: / 0' 2 '/ '56
Time: 15-o Q
Farm Name: F, 0 GLay—e2c County:A'G,-­14/oqW/ck-_
Owner Name:- 5AiAt�- Phone No!
One Site Representative:-P.C) Integrator: H-44-
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location J 1?, 600 4- j 1� 2--�
Latitude: Longitude:
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Pouftry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0sow CLayer Mairy
ONursery ONon-Layer E3BGef
13Feedet
Other Type of Livrestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lag(>ons:_L— (inciucie in the DrawlInge and Obamstilona ft freaboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inpaection: �C'4 4 &V "4 14 9- &,( j
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour Slorm storage?: Yes 0 No 0
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?, Yes 0 No 0
Is erosion observed?: Yes 0 No 0
Is any discharge observed?-. Yes 0 No 13
0 Man-made 0 Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?, Yes 0 No 0
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes 0 No 0
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type. Acreage:
h,

Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Yes [I No [I
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?: Yes 0 No 11
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?: Yes E3 No 0
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?: Yes 0 No 13
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes a No 0
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes [3 No 0
Does record keeping need improvement?: Yes 0 No 0
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?: Yes 0 No 0
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature: Date:
0c: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or Observations:
AOI-January 17, 1996
Use Attachments if Needed
I,qq

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
AT? WA
IDEF.HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13,1996
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Hollowell Swine Farm
P.O. Box 307
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
Subject: Compliance Evaluation
Facility # 66-38
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
Inspection
On October 24, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. As a result
of the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with
the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a.
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste m ' anagement plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 10 1, % FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 An Equal Opportunity AffIrmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 Nif 50% recycled/ 100% post-consumeT paper

Hollowell Swine Farm
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill. 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
if Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. John Fitzgerald -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
77'
Routine 0 CompWilt 0 Follow-ul) of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u2 of DSIVC review 0 Other
Date ofInspection 101-J-4 /I
Facilitv Number
be Time (if Inspection zzzln— 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Tirne (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: [3Registered [3Applied for Permit (ex. 1.25 for I hr 15 rnin' ' )) Spent on Review
P'Certiried 13 Permitted or Inspection �includes traveland processing)
E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ........................................................................................................................................... . ...
O-T-am ............
Farm Nam
Coulitv: .............................................................. .......................
.............. .... - ................ ................. - ......
OwnerName: ................................................... - ..................................................................... Phonel.\'o: .......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .................. .......... .................................. Title: ................................... I ........ 11, ................. Phone No: ...................................................
'0ailing Address: .................................................... I...... ........................................ ......... ....... .................................................................. I .................. .....................
T-."—
Onsite Representative: ........ 1,.dAl ............ . ...............
........ ........... I ........ ... Integrator, ......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator ................................................... .............................................................. Operator Certification Number: .........................................
Location of Farm:
low
Latitude 1 44 Longitude 6 64
!Iumi�er'o rLa2oons'ijftold�ifiHo. I I ME] Subsurface Drains Present 11C] Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area H
General
1. Are there any buffers that need rnaintenance/irnprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0
Dischar�-eori,inatedat: Elf-agoon E]SprayField E30ther
Z' zl
it. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. It'discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. If dis charge is observed, what is the estimated t1ow in gal/min?
t�
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management systern. (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
niaintenance/irnprovement?
4/30/97
C3 Yes No
V'1
Yes �dNo
C1 Yes U640
Yes No
0 Yes
No
0 Yes
0. No
0 Yes
No
0 Yes
No
Continued
on back

k, )p 0 - �� I ..
.lFacility Number.-/
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desion?
M
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
9. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
C
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): StrL ture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
T �
....................................... ...................................... ........... ...... .......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DIA'Q)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
0 Yes No
CJ Yes No
0 Yes No
El Yes )� No
11
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Applicatio
14. Is; there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the �tatel notify DWQ)
15'. Crop type
... .... /11111 !::;�g ............................................................................................... .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
0 C�
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Onl
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMIP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement? '
...................... .......................................
El Yes A No
El Yesk No
A Yes El No
El Yes /El No
O.Yes KNO
......... I.- ...................
0 Yes L�"No
0 Yes e No
Yes dNo
Yes eNo
0 Yes PNo
El Yes OINO
El Yes 0 No
El Yes RfNo
gfyes 0 No
Reviewer/Inspector Narne
Reviewer/Inspector Signature;
Date;
to
ce: Division of Water Quality, Water Qualitf Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4
Division of Water Quality
AAVN% A000% 7MPft4A
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E) E.= H N FZ
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Ed Tom Hollowell Jr. D
Hollowell Farm
Rt 1 Box 182 EIAM � 1-T-1071
Seaboard NC 27876
DEHNR RALEI Notice of Violation
REGIONAL OFF Designation of Operator in Charge
Hollowell Farm
Facility Number 66--38
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell Jr.:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet be6n returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S-. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
#.
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslett
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
PD. Box 1 29535, . Old FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0,535 An Equal Opportunity/AffirmativeAcfion Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 1 00k post-consurner paper

State of North Carolina
DePartment of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional C�fice
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1DaHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1997
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Route 1, Box 182
Seaboard, North Carolina 27876
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-38
Tom Hollowell Swine Farm
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
On July 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility.
This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determi ned that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
pLan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Of f ice appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely
C '�l &4�b-M7
11uy arrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr.Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 10 1, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Voice 919-571-470D NO C An Equal Opportunity AffIrmative Action Employer
50% recycted/11A Post -consumer paper

k
Facility Number Date of Inspection 0�
Time of Inspection �� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: 2<;; �stered D Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review V�T_b
0 Certified 0 Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... . .......................... . ............... . .......................................... . . ....................... . .........................
Farm Name: ...... 1-1) County:
Land Owner Name;
.................... ................ . ..................................................... Phone No: ......................................................... . ............................
Facility Conctact: ....... leq.��a ... :!L .............................................. Title: ................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: ....... ....... ......... .. 6.r' C.91 .... ... i�� ( . .......... J.2 ... V .... (0 ........... . ............... r ..........................
Onsite Representative: ... 1-76.21 P.'A/.ALZZ ..................................
Certified Operator: ............. ....... ............ . ................ . ...... . ........ . ............ Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Form: 51Z
.. . .................................... . ............... . ................................................................................................................................................................. . ............................... . ...........
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation and Desi2n CaDacitv
0
Other
ace Drains
Area FW
Genera
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement9
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon 0 Spray field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
No,
Yes
Yes
0 Yes OVIN
0 Yes No
Yes
Yes7No,
0 Yes
0 Yes No/
Continued on back

Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes 2<0
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? El Yes �N�o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? 0 Yes 21q�o
strugures
flacoRns and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
El Yes
Freeboard. (ft):. Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
... . ..... . ........ .............. . ............ ... . ..... . . . ....... . ....
..................
. ........
............................
M<O
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0 Yes
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
-
0 Yes
0<0�'
�0_
12,
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvemcnt?
0 Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, not ify DWQ)
13.
.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
211y
NO
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
Yes
-Qfqo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15,
Crop type .... ........................ .............................................. ..............................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A 41)?
El Yes
ONo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
0 Yes
Z�
ErN
18,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[Ell Yes
0
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0 Yes
2<0
��o
20.
2 1.
Does facility require a follo w-up visit by same agency?
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail discuss
0 Yes
0 Yes
���O
to review/inspection with on -site representative?
For
22.
Certified Engilities Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El Yes
0 No
23,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Cl Yes
[I No
24,
Does record keeping need improvement?
0 Yes
0 No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unkt 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
'Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13,1996
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Hollowell Swine Farm
P.O. Box 307
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
IEHNF;Z
Subject: Compliance Evaluation
Facility # 66-38
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
Inspection
On October 24, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Of f ice conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste hondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. As a result
of the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with
the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the- assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
I
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 10 1, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Nif C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 5D% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Hollowell Swine Farm
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
91 Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
I _ h �. A UAZE�
Ju y E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. John Fitzgerald -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr,, Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13,1996
Tom Hollowell
Glover Farm
PO Box 307
Jackson NC 27845
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Glover Farm
Facility ID#: 66-38
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at91gn33-0026.
Sincerel
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
aw, C
P,O. Box 27687, V 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N An Equal Opportunty/Affirmative Action Employer
Voi c e 919-715-4 100 _50% recycled/lCrOk post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
.Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jbnathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Tom Hollowell
Glover Farm
,PO Box 307
Jackson NC 27845
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Glover Farm
Facility ID#: 66-38
Noahampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
Ntw. owne';
_r. 14,01119W'0 10
ox 1% a.
6eabobrd, NC_
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by'January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation fonn to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerel
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, W 14 C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
AW
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Nmf
Voice 919-715-4 100 550% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Lr!WA
Health and Natural Resources OW
Raleigh Regional Office
icmes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary FE F**4 F=1
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 2, 1995
Mr. R. 0. Glover
Route 1, Box 130
Margarettsville, North Carolina 27853
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Swine operation
State Road 1328
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Glover:
On July 24, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Of f ice conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed;
-Your lagoon has.very little freeboard, less than 6 inches in
some areas. This problem should receive prompt attention in
order to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breach.
-An excessive amount of uncontained waste was observed
discharging to an adjacent downhill slope from your lagoon.
This problem must be permanently corrected.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues within
30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address
how you plan to correct these problems and submit a schedule (with
dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyded/ TO% Post -consumer Paper

Glover Hog Farm
Management Deficiency Notification
Page 2
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H: \animdn
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

ILIL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER (DU(_'LITY SECTION TO RRO P,02/02
Site Requires Immediate A ientior
Facilitv No.
DrVISION OF ENVIRONWNTAL MANAGEMEN7
ANRVJAL FEMLOT OPFPATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 3 1995
Time: //q
Farm Name/Owner_ e, 0 - 61 vg-r /_ — ,Z,- c-
Mailing Address: bO >1 -7
County: V-011IM-wel"I
Inte-ZMor- Phone:
On Site Representative: phone: 9 9 - Le
Physical AddrtsvI-ocation:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry cattle -
Design Capacity: 4*�_ — Number of Animals on Site. -?5-0
DEM Certification N=ber: ACE— DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: _____Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Ammal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximaieN I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or 0 Actual Freeboard: 6-L—Ft. — Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)�&e or So Was any erosion' observed? Yes orl�o)
Is adequate Land available for spray? <5k or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No 7
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS nainimum setback criteria! 200 Feet from Dwellings?,j_;i or No
100 Feet from Wells?j2s or No
-��e animal wasTe stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strcam? Yes or tL)
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lane'? Yes or-f
.I.rs anf mal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing sysceim, or other
si r-� I a-- rn an -made devices? ?19 or No If Yes, Please Explaim
-.k)cS Ific faQility maintain adequate waste nUU1a9dTnCnt Tecords (volumes of manure, land applied.
s-pray irrigated on sptcific acreage with cover crop)'� Yes or4q�:)
Additional Coa=Ants: - fSt,
-T� J�,
j. j '" 0
N
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
SignaILLIC
Use Attachmens if Needed.
TOTAL P - 0_2

Facility Number: tla6- -3
_ 51R
Division of Enviromnental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Datej - U - 5�4
Time:- 123 0
General Information:
Farm Name: 62WY
&A, Z
b110,W -_-� County:
Owner Name: &Ll2k.,f� Phone NoAA
On Site Representative: Integrator:
MailingAddress: iz�
Physical Address/Location: 13 tl 6 0-- 0 O� 2-,
4
f, �( / 1� , le,
I Latitude: .1. Longitude:
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Sow U Layer U Dairy
U Nursery U Non -Layer 0 Beef
Zfeeder __6t, n
OiherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:- (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection-,
L,agoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes El No 31_�
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: 7�' Yes R"*-No U
Is erosion observed?: Yes Q No a ---
Is any discharge observed? Yes No a-"
Q Man-made U Not Man-made
Co ver Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes �3 No
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes U No
( list the crops which need improvement) -7
Crop type:jd)� a-4+ G rW 4AwA Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes U No
Is a well I ocated within 100 feet of waste application? Yes U No
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes El
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes Q No
AOI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes U
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yeso D
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes : NOO U
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes 2r--No D
Explain any Yes answers: 4�—,
� 411 -1 61v w—,
I - -� 0
F2
0, J9 4,q v e/ 1) ot ov,
4� *0. Awl-
4--4r 17 V aw,4
Signature:— z;�e� Date:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or-Oftervations: -7—o
.1
�C
1 (9 ( =Vv-�
O)m a 6' K je tA e_- ( � i- P Ac "I j /�Vyj
P� qV4 � V k- r 0 k-I J - 9-V 1 J 04- C e- 4 j,7
6 �, 5A- I
AOI — January 17,1996
LA
N
00
S'A 1300

M E M 0 R A N D U M
April 29, 1996
To: John Holley, Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
From: Buster Towell, Environmental Technician/V--
Subject; Tom Hollowell Swine Farm\Northampton County
On March 26, 1996, an inspection was conducted at the above
referenced swine operation located on SR 1300 near the junction of
SR 1328 (Mt Zion Church Rd.) in Northampton County.
The facility had adequate. freeboard due to the fact that the
lagoon had�recently been pumped and was rated as compliant with the
NCAC .0217 regulations. There was however a potential problem
noted with what appeared to be lagoon seepage due to burrowing
rodent activity.
With this MEMO the RRO Water Quality Section requests that someone
with ,�,;,your Section evaluate the situation and possibly make
recommendations to the land owner.
Please find attached copies of photos taken on the subject
inspection date, a location map, and the names and addresses of the
land -owner.
If you need.additional information please see Buster Towell.
f �i 5.1 --?�

Facility Numher:61:�'- -3
-=�2—
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation'Record
Date: 26 -
Time: 73 o
�eneral Information:
Farm Name: 61ay-WAyo�, — 70,, 1h1149a 4-6-l' ______County: We I
OwnerNarne: Zo,-n -Phone No:-�Ilq ­5�3y
On Site Representative: Integrator:
MailingAddress: 121
61 0
Physical Address/Location: -SW /J 17 6 (2 f
*& x / ,.v , le
ILatitude: Longitude:
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Anitnals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Sow U Layer El Dairy
U Nursery U Non -Layer U Beef
afe-eder L-0
OtherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:_ (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Enspectiow.
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes Q
No 2r---�
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ar" No 0
Is erosion observed?:
Yes U
No4Er---
Is any discharge observed?
Yes �D
No Er'--'
Q Man-made 0 Not Man-made
,Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Y es U
No 2--�
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes D
No
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:-L;A;,,-44 I C, r,)Sj Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes U
No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes El
No all,
Is -animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes C)
'No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes J
AOI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement'.) Yes C-33
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes o Q
Does record keeping need improvement? YesVNo. 0
Did the facility fail to have a copy -of the Animal Waste Management Plan on'site? Yes 2---No Q
Explain any Yes answers: eg— &
I'lee e d X
V
Signature:_ Date:
cc.- Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawina Rr Obs�rvatLojns:
M I
7-
f 11
r LC) 4� �4
1 OX-r­
L-A
A01 — January 17,1996
N

jr
11(HHi1NT
C100NIT1101,
Itodents such as the groundhog (wood-
chuck), muskrat, and beaver are attract -
ed to dams and reservoirs. and can be
rity and proper performance of the embankment
and spillway. Groundhog and muskrat burrows
weaken the embankment and can serve as path-
ways for seepage. Beavers may plug the spillway
and raise the pool level. Rodent control is essential
in preserving a well -maintained dam.
The Groundhog or Woodchuck
The groundhog is the largest member of the
squirrel family. Its coarse fur is a grizzled grayish
brown with a reddish cast. Typical foods include
grasses, clover, alfalfa, soybeans, peas. lettuce,
and apples. Breeding takes place during early
spring (beginning at the age of one y,3ar) with an
average of four or five young per litter, one litter
per year. The average life expectancy is two or
three years with a maximum of six years.
Occupied groundhog burrows are easily recog-
nized in the spring duetothe groundhog's habitof
keeping them "cleaned out," Fresh dirt is generally
found at the mouth of active burrows. Half -round
mounds, paths leading from the den to nearby
fields, and clawed or girdled trees and shrubs also
help identify inhabited burrows and dens,
When burrowing into an embankment, ground-
hogs stay above the phreatic surface (upper sur-
face of seepage or saturation) to stay dry. The
burrow is rarely a singletunnel. It is usuallyforked,
with more than one entrance and with several side
passages or rooms from 11-to-12 feet long.
Groundhog Control
Control methods should be implemented during
early spring when active burrows are easy to find,
young groundhogs have not scattered, and there
is less likelihood of damage to other wildlife. In
later summer, fall, and winter, game animals will
scurry into groundhog burrowsfor brief protection
and may even take up permanent abode during the
period of groundhog hibernation.
Groundhogs can be controlled by using fumi-
gants or by shooting. Fumigation is the most
practical method of controlling groundhogs.
Around buildings or other high fire hazard areas,
shooting may be preferable, Groundhogs will be
discouraged from inhabiting the embankment if
the vegetal cover is kept mowed.
Muskrat
The muskrat is a stocky rodent with a broad
head, short legs, small eyes, and rich dark brown
fur. Muskrats are chiefly nocturnal, Their principal
food includes stems, roots, bulbs, and foliage of
aquatic plants. They also feed on snails, mussels,
crustaceans, insects, and fish. Usually three to five
litters, averaging six to eight young per litter, are
produced each year. Adult muskrats average one
foot in length and three pounds in weight. The life
expectancy is less than two years, with a maximum
of four years. Muskrats can be found wherever
there are marshes, swamps, ponds, lakes, and
streams having calm or very slowly moving water
with vegetation in the water and along the banks.
Muskrats make their homes by burrowing into
the banks - of lakes and streams -or by building
"houses" of rushes and other plants. Their burrows
begin from 6 to 18 inches below the water surface
and penetrate the embankment on an upward
slant. At distances up to 15 feet from the entrance.
a dry chamber is hollowed out above the water
level. Once a muskratclen is occupied, a rise in the
water level will cause the muskrat to dig farther
and higher to excavate a new dry chamber. Dam-
age (and the potential for problems) is com-
pounded where groundhogs or other burrowing
animals construct their dens in the embankment
opposite muskrat dens.
Barriers to prevent burrowing offer the most
practical protection to earthen structures. A pro-
perly constructed riprap and filter layer will dis-
courage burrowing. The filter and riprap should
extend at least 3 feet below the water line. As the
muskrat attempts to construct a burrow, the sand
and gravel of the filter layer cave in and thus dis-
courage den building. Heavy wire fencing laid flat
against the slope and extending above and below
the waterline can also be effective. Eliminating or
reducing aquatic vegetation along the shoreline
I Fl..
Muskrat roundhog
Dangerously
close burrows
11(HNNf
4,1)N'nU)L
ow

rA
Right: Beavef
dam
constructed
actoss a
spillway
channel.
ItODUff
U)NMI11
Muskrat Control
will discourage muskrat habitation (see section on
Vegetation).
Eliminating a Burrow
The recommended method of backfilling a bur-
row on an embankment is mud -packing, This sim-
ple, inexpensive method can be accomplished by
placing one or two lengths of metal stove or vent
pipe in a vertical position over the entrance of the
den. Making sure that the pipe connection to the
den does not feak, the mud -pack mixture is then
poured into the pipe until the burrow and pipe are
filled with the earth -water mixture. The pipe is
removed and dry earth is tamped into the entrance.
The mud -pack is made by adding water to a 90
percent earth and 10 percent cement mixture until
a slurry orthin cement consistency is attained. All
entrancesshouid bepluggedwith well -compacted
earth, and vegetation re-established. Dens should
be eliminated without delay because damage from
just one hole can lead to failure of a dam.
Beaver
Beaver will try to plug spillways with their
cuttings. Routinely removing the cuttings is one
way to alleviate the problem, Another successful
remedy is the placement of electrically charged
wire or wires around the spillway inlet, Trapping
beaver may be done by the owner during the
appropriate season.
Hunting and Trapping Regulations
Because hunting and trapping regulations
change from year to year you should consult:
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Archdale Building
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
6J ( b
'W 10

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
ILFWAA
,&146ja
da
ID FE F1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 2, 1995
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Route 1., Box 182
Seaboard 27876
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Swine Operation
State Road 1328
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
On July 24, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Of f ice conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoon has very little freeboard, less than 6 inches in
some areas. This problem should receive prompt attention in
order to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breach.
-An excessive amount of uncontained waste was observed
discharging at the back corner of your lagoon. This problem
must be permanently corrected.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues within
30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address
how you plan to correct these problems and submit a schedule (with
dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
3800 Borreff Ddve, Suite 1100aleigh, North Carofina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Hol lowell Hog Farm
Management Deficiency Notification
Page 2.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility. of all animal facilities. The bivision of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of.
the, State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss.. of deemed--,.
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This . plan must be Certified by a
designated tecfinical specialist or a.professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell.at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H: \animdn
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil.and
Water Conservation

JLJIL-14-1995 15;26 FROM DEM WATER DUALITY SECTION TO RRO P-02/02
Site Requires Immediate A len6or -
Facilitv No. 4 3 -2
DIVISION OF ENWRONMENTAL MANAGEMEEN7
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEkAlIONS SrrE VISrrATION RECORD
DATE: -7- /-?- _, I 99s
Time: / -Z 3 0
Farm Name/Owner. 7-06- IeT
blaRing Address: fe�f
County:
Inteirmor. Phone:
On Site Revresentative: Phone-.
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine �?oultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site. 7 e J
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ DEM Cerification N=ber: ACNIEW�__
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: —_—Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fTeeboard of I FooE + 25 year 24 houir storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or�N� Actual FTecboard: Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? e or No Was any erosion observed? Yes
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes 0 Is the cover crop adequate? Yes oz�'N_6
Crop(s) being utilized. C4i'
Does the facility meet SCS niin�num setback cTiteria"? 200 Feet from Dwellings;7,-:Y� or No
100 Feet f rom Wells? Qi�or No
-.�ic anirnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strcam? Yes OrO9
aidmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'! Yes ocn§
T.; animal wasic discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
-Iimilar man-made devices?(.9 or No If Yes. Please Explain. -
PCS Ific facility maintain adequate waste nixiagernwirrecurds (volumes of n=uTc. land applitd.
spray inigated on spccific acreage with cover crop)'? Yes oigD
Additional Comments; oof�(0­13 tq bc �-A C-vy 110—/ , r�, -r
1?4Ao_,r / eJ c rXV, ak
fin$
X�r 1 4! 4 #1
*0 J
.1 a� J),U
r
6- _7
cc: Facility Assessment Unit . Use Aimchmems if Needed.
TOTAL P-02

0 R � L� U T � N
SP -
DE14NR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Route 1, Box 182
Seaboard NC
27876
Kenneth Schuster
Regional Supervisor
Divmon of Enmronmental Management
Raleigh NC 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster,
I am responding to your letter dated August 2, 1995 in regard to the subject of the
Swine operation lagoon. Sir, my wife explained to Mr. Towell that due to the unexpected
heavy and continuos rainfall we could not keep the lagoon pumped down.
As soon as the ground dried out we pumped the lagoon down on July 18. This
allowed us to get our free board down to over one and a half feet and this stopped the
discharging at the back comer of the lagoon.
We also asked our Soil Conservationist about our problem and said that we only
needed to pump the lagoon down to provide for the freeboard needed for proper lagoon
management.
Sincerely,
1�� I- "
Mr. Tom Hollowell
cc: Northampton County Sod and Water Conservation District

JUL-14-1995
15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
PRO P. 02/02
Site Requires Immediate Aqen6or-
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERAIIONS SFM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -7-12— _, 1995
Time. / -Z 3 C)
Farm Narne/Ownt
Mailing Address:
County: _4/0 H �Ail-, . OiVn
Integrator:
Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: :!:i 12 -Z- 1� ---
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity. qqD Numberof Animals on Site: (Pou
DEM Certification Number: ACE- DEM Certification Number: ACN-EW-
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: _Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal WasEe Lagoon have sufficient fteeboard of I FooL + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximaieiy I Foot + 7 incbes) Yes or No Actual FTeeboard:46 -inches
e or No Was any erosion observed? Yes 0(s)
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)9
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes 0 is the cover crop adequate? Yes 06)
Crop(s) beirig utilized:.
Does the facHity meet SCS mb�imum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings e or No
100 Feet from Wells?KSVor No
--�!c ar.iTnal waSTe stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Riue Line Stream? Yes ord9
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lme? Yes &�N—To)
animal waste discharL7ed into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flusbing system, or other
.;imils:r man-made devices? �9 or No If Yt�s. Please EXPIdITI.
J4 PCs tfic f:tcility maintain adequate waste Ul&1agernClIt TeCords (volumes of ruarture, land appfird.
spray irrigawd. on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes ojc-N�)
Additional Comments: t94 bA �Zc C-weia'I
J 1<.J / e--J L r/,/,
*9 o
5,, ,
P r k ON,
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TDTAL P-02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governar
Bill Holman, Secretary
KerrT. Stevens, Director
March 15, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Ed Tom Hollowell Jr.
Hollowell Farm
Rt I Box 192
Seaboard NC 27876
Farm Number: 66 - 38
Dear Ed Tom Hollowell Jr.:
1kT1?*W'J
IT
A&4 1 0
now
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANc> NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Hollowell Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215. 1 OC, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. if any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleiah, NC 27699-1617
47
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension 363 or Charles
Alvarez with the Raleiah Retional Office at [phone].
C a
Sinctrely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Tele phone [phone] FAX [phone]B
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Route 1, Box 182
Seaboard, NC 27876
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
law
NCDFNR
NcRTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NArURAL RF-SOURCCS
August 3, 2000
CERTU71ED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTE
RE: High Freeboard Level
Farm #66-38
File No. PC 00-031
Under the authority delegated to me by the Secretary of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, I considered the factors related to the high freeboard level in your
lagoon that occurred at your farm during February of this year. Because you promptly reported
the high freeboard level and made every reasonable effort to solve the problems with your
irrigation equipment, I have decided not to assess a civil penalty in this case.
The Division of Water Quality appreciates your efforts to operate your farm in
accordance with state laws and regulations as shown by your actions in this case and by the
results of your farm inspections on April 17 and July 12, 2000.
Sincerely,
/A-- Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Ken Schuster, RRO Regional Supervisor
RRO
File # DD 99-008
Central Files
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #5 2-01 -01
An Equal Opportunitil lAffirmative Action Employer
509',, recycledl 10% post- consi inter paper
http:11h2o. enr. state. nc. Us
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Ouality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governo�� 71174 10
F�v
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director.
', I', ;GH
September 6, 2000
Ed Tom Hollowell Jr.
Hollowell Farm
Rt I Box 182
Seaboard, NC 27876
lkf?W,A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANC) NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660038
Hollowell Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Northampton County
Dear Ed Tom Hollowell Jr.:
In accordance with your application received on April 4, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Ed Tom Hollowell Jr., authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application. system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Hollowell Farm, located in Northampton County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 1150 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining,the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the -number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAW"MP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance wi ' th� NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS660038
Hollowell Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made Mthin 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Don Friday at [phone] ext. 533.
Sincerely,
rr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Northampton County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

Edward Thomas HolloweR Jr.
Koute 1, Box 182 AN
Seaboard, N. C. 27876
April 11, 2000
Mr, Kenneth Schuster P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
N. C. Department of Natural Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster,
I am writing in response to the notice of violation that I received on March 21, 2000 concern-
ing farms 66-38 and 66-83 in Northampton County. The reason for there being little freeboard
was a mechanical problem with my irrigation system on January 13, 2000, 1 immediately con-
tacted my Long manufacturing dealer, Thomas Pope, to order parts for my 1979 Long irriga-
tion reel. I called Mr. Pope several times concerning my order and he assured me that he had
ordered the parts. On February 16, nearly a month later, the parts finally arrived. My son and
I installed the parts on the eighteenth; however, due to faulty parts, the system broke down
again and again,
On Tuesday, February 22 1 called Buster Towell and left him a message pertaining to my lack
of freeboard. He came on February 24 to confirm the problem. I explained to Mt. Towell that
I was unable to reduce my lagoon level due to equipment failure and the wet ground. I also in-
formed him that I had just returned from the bank to acquire financing for a new irrigation reel
from Revelles Agri Products.
Mr. Towell told me that he appreciated that I was trying to follow the law by contacting him
about my freeboard problem. He also informed me that I needed to obtain assistance from the
local NRCS technical specialist, Tony Short and that I had to have a plan of action within 24
hours for farms 66-83 and 66-38. f told him that I would contact Mr. Short the next morning.
On February 25, 1 contacted Mr. Short to obtain a plan of action as part of the requirement for
my freeboard problem. Mr. Short said that he had been out of town for several days due to a
family illness and had only briefly seen the fax regarding the requirements. He instructed me
to irrigate my lagoons back down to a safe level following my waste management plan. On
that same day, I called Revells Agri Products and inquired about renting an irrigation reel. Mr.
Bill Stalls called me back and informed me that the had a reel that I could rent. I picked the

I
reel up on Saturday to get my lagoon back to a safe level.
The following week I called Mr. Short to tell him that I had followed his recommendation to
get the lagoon back to a safe level.
I was offended vAth receiving a notice of violation when I followed the law. I did as I was in-
structed to do. Mr. Short has informed me that he will take responsibility for this action and
has sent me a letter, which I have included with this letter, explaining why he could not assist
me with a 24-hour plan of action.
f feel that I am being punished for following the law. I realize that f am responsible for main-
taining freeboard, but the circumstances that prevented me from doing this were beyond my
control. I do not understand why I was sent a notice of violation. I hope that you will review
this action and find that I did as I was instructed, f would appreciate it if this improper action
would be removed from my files.
Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.
Sincerely,
(,^e j -C j
ZOW aj /
Edward T. Hollowell Jr.
cc: Tony Short, Northampton NRCS
Mr. Bill White, James Wellman & White, Attorneys at Law.
6\1

April 6, 2000
Mr. Ken Schuster
1628 Mail Service Center
Ralei g h NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster,
I am writing this letter on behalf of Mr. Tom Hollowell and Mr.
Waylon Baugham, Jr. Both have received Notices of Violations from
your office (66-38, 66-83, and 66-55).
Mr. Hollowell called me on the morning of Friday, February 25 Ih and
informed me that he had to have a plan within 24 hours.
I had been out of the office on Thursday the 24'h dealing with a
family illness. A fax was sent to our office on that Thursday
regarding the requirements in this 24-hour plan. I only briefly read
the requirements having just seen the material. Later that morning
Mr. Baugham's son and wife came into my office requesting the 24-
hour plan. I told Mr. Hollowell and the Baughams that there was no
way that I could do these plans within 24 hours. That day I had
scheduled with our Area Engineer to visit 8 pond sites to be repaired
under the Emergency Conservation Program (ECP). We had
attempted to schedule this meeting for over two months. So it was
physically impossible for me to visit these sites and write these plans
within the 24-hour time period.
I told Mr. Hollowell and Mr. Baugham that I accept responsibility for
this action. I am the only technical specialist in this office; therefore
I was the only one available to write their plans. And I noted to them
that a site visit was needed to adequately write the plans.
The Natural Resource% Conservation Service, it, age,icy orthe USDA, ismi Equal Opportunity Employer.

my recommendation to both of them was to pu mp their lagoons
clown to a safe level. This would be done under their original waste
management plans.
The following week, they both reported that the lagoon levels were
down and that no runoff occurred from the lagoons or from the
spray fields.
I have discussed this matter with BusterTowell and with my
supervisor, Bill Harrell in Goldsboro. Bill indicated that we had
teleconference training on this special plan writing which was
conducted byCarroll Pierce. Again I was not here to receive that
training because of personal matters. Bill asked if I had since written
a plan. I told him that I had not- my understanding was that the plan
ha d to be done m(I thi n the 24- hour tj me Peri od.
I want to assure you that I take full responsibility for these actions.
These landowners did as they were directed. I believe that it would
be unfa i r to 1 mpos; e a nythi ng u Pon them. I a m pre pa red to meet
with you or with any other persons necessary to clear up this matter.
Sincerely,
73�� L
Tony short
DistrictConservationist
Technical S pecialist
COPY: Bill Harrell
--'f OM Hollowell
Waylon Baugha m, Jr.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service, an agency offlic USDA. is an Equal Opportunity rniployer.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
March 27, 2000
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Route 1, Box 182
Seaboard, North Carolina 27876
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Hollowell Farm
Facility # 66-38
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
On February 22, 2000, the Raleigh Regional Office received a message via
voice mail system which stated that the subject swine operati.on had only 12 inches
of available freeboard in its waste lagoon. On Thursday, February 24, 2000, Mr.
Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office visited the site and confirmed that the
amount of freeboard was as reported.
During the site visit, Mr. Towell advised you to seek assistance from your local Soil
and Water Conservation District to help you develop 4 24 hour Plan of Action
(POA) to aid you in manage'ing your wastewater from your facility. As of this
writing the Raleigh Regional Office has not received a POA ftom you pertaining to
this facility.
Please note that the lack of available freeboard in your lagoon is considered a
violation of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), and as
such may be subject to civil penalties.
The Raleigh Regional Office is considereing an enforcement action against you for
the above violations of your Certified Animal Waste Manaement Plan. If you have
justification that these violations were caused by circumstances or events beyond
your control you should include them with your written response within fourteen
days of your receipt of this Notice. Your response will be reviewed and for -warded
to the Director for his considerations. In the absence of any justification, the
Director will proceed with the enforcement action.
7 t � -A M F. F I e. A
F7
2 010
14328 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-tSZa
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFEIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Tom Hollowell
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this Notice, please contact Mr. Buster Towell at (919)
571-4700.
Sincerely,
)L L-k.E.
Kenneth Schuster,
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

M
Fast Track Freeboard NOV Checklist
Date —A-Lz Y f svvv
Time
Qn�Li�e Rep
Aofo?
Facility Location S 19 1300 jvor4ov
Name of Owner /A e?' 0 -e-
Address of Owner 124- ?C—e
41- C -7- -7
----------
Name of Cert. Operator To o., AA
tq!�grator S
TM� -of Tq� ON (sow, feeder to finish, etc.)
Number of animals onsite D
Number of animals certified for
Freeboard level
Notes: M 1, Ile 0/
—,4,, J le p 4-
ez
q--/ 2- L11 SVV'& M Ir- I d6 1( M e, a
Ila ov ce ",p. Fe, o, 5
o p, rZ e -A (e 0q.,c,( 40 0,jr4.a v,-zr-e,Ce-
7- -Zv� - -��Y C . 8 . j ' 0 �- 4 19 L-L
14
VW t�
14,J
Ic 4-,, Y�7 A- -CA' Q
I-_ - J� - h
I "np��iLo!A_�Iqnature

Type of Visit '-0 Com i ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Via =Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other El Denied Access
Number Date of Visit: -Time:
Not Onpratinnn I Cll
I" k=
,Ej Permitted [3 Certified Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 7 V�,, Y",e /� /_19jalk— County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: -rnl_
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator,
Operator Certification Number:
[I Swine [I Poultry El Cattle Ej Horse Latitude & C 44 Longitude a 1 16
Design currcnU. Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pu`:41i&­" Voultry Cattle
Swine P on,: CavaciN PoDulation Capacity Population
We4jk6 Feeder JEI Layer I El Dairy I
U4;recder to Finish JEJ Non -Layer I I IF-1 Non -Dairy
... ...... . ... ..
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 10 other I
0 Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity F_
IE] Gilts
Q Boars Total SSLW
Number of Subsurface Drains P�resent [E] �La oo�n Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Lagoons
ond§V! Solid 4raps.­ 0 o Liquid Waste Management System
oldin P 110
Discharizes & Stream ImRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Soray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed., whal is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (frccboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
El Yes 0<0
0 Yes 42-N<o
El Yes
[11 Yes 0'-No
El Yes VNo
El Yes 0
El yes 0
Structure
05103101 Continued

Facility N um be r: ��a — _3 Date of Inspection W��
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes 0-1�0
seepage, etc.)
6. Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an El Yes No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mainteriance/improveri L1 Yes N
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improveni El Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? El Yes No
Waste Application
o
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? El Yes N
11. Is there evidence of over application? 0 Excessive Ponding PAN 0 Hydraulic Overload El Yes ;o
12. Croptype
13. Do the receiving crops differ wid those designated in the Certified A�nimal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? Yes D'N(
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes [2�0�
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes 0 No
c) This facility is perided for a wettable acre determination? El Yes [__1 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? El Yes El N
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? El Yes _E�00�
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate ofCoverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 0 Yes 0-5o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) El Yes '_ 2rN-o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) EKes El No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes El No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? Yes [I No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) El Yes El No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? El Yes El No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes El No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes El No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
jiu� ig NES answem'
Commenti�(refer to question #):,,Exp.1 gyES a, ?dh'!"�Ay recommell ill iiiiiiiiii,160 e."6rinni
6wffigs facility to better
of explAiri4itilitilions (OiCadditionall
MEI Field Copy El Final Notes
7
4jkj 140.r- lzcz-�'I(��&e­q
Reviewer/Inspector Name e--r ­9 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

dip
I Facility Number: 6� — M Date of Inspection PPIE�
Odor in=
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or pub lie property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
Additional Comments and/or Dravdiags:
0.5103101
El Yes (0)
El Yes �:N o
Yes n�o<
0 Yes 0
Yes ;N//
0 Yes No
El Yes 0

TypeofVisit J�),Co be Inspection Operation Review C-) Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
m - t
Reason for Visit �Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit- Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
FarmName:
P-4-, Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Z_ ns-L>N j y e— / I I
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone;
Phone No:
Integrator: 1/6
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =0 =i = Longitude: = 0 =' = 11
eSig!
10
u e-
�1110064&w
�Q' ) Wesi lig, e
!��iiiiioultr.y
11101
i
..aci.
6 ulation
I oultK.Y, C. P ci 0 ulati
C
e
ion
o Finish
er
Feeder
-Layer
Calf
eeder to Finish
S I III,
ry Heifer
El Farrow to Wean
r UUM.)
ym
El Dry Cow
El Farrow to Feeder
El Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Finish
ers
0 Beef Stocker
Gilts
E]Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
IE]Beef Brood Cow
sum
E] Turkeys
El Turkey Poultsl
Other
El Other
Discharizes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
El Yes o [:1 NA El NE
0 Yes NA El NE
El Yes o PNA NE
Yes VN
,� NA 0 NE
El Yes 91KO [I NA El NE
El Yes [__1 No [:1 NA El NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:,04�,
3M
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(iel large -trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
El Yes 01N__o A El NE
. C /
Yes o [.I N A El N E
Structure 5 Structure 6
E]Yes ZrNo A El NE
El Yes :No [:--] NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes ;N"ol A El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures; lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes No NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0
El Yes No El NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes "No NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ;No (03 NA [:1 NE
0 Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (CU, Zn, etc.)
[:1 PAN El PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Sail
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift [I Application Outside of Area
12. Crop typc(s) _649K,"11
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Yes
N NA
0 NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
0 NA
El
El NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?E] Yes
�t�110 NA
El NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
El NA
El NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[--]YespNo
[INA
[:INE
0 1k. 1
ts; re �fi§werg.and/o dny�' j com'- I s
�%Wse s?6 fS6i]it*'tdh�tt6i.,i�iplaiiil�ituations. (use auditional,pag as-ne s
kv 1.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 21 L qZ i�n
Reviewer/[ nspector Signature, Date: /I
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued
roq -t 9 71,11W

Facility Number: _10 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 0 Yes ONo 0"NA [2 NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
El Yes No [INA
0 NE
the appropirate box. D WUP 0 Checklists [:1 Design 0 Maps [-I Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes Zo El NA
El NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers D Annual Certification
0 Rainfall 0 Stocking El Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections E:1 Monthly and V
Rain Inspections eather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
D Yes :�NttNA
C1 NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
N
EE11 Yes N 'NA
El NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes N A
El NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0 Yes N NA
El N E
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes o NA
El NE
27,
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes , No [.I NA
[I NE
nth-
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes 0 No El NA El NE
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
0 Yes
[:1 No
[I NA
D NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
0 Yes
ONo
El NA
EINE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notif� the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
E:1 No
El NA
[I NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
[I No
[:1 NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
[__1 No
[:1 NA
E] NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

1 Type of Visit jo Compl' ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
'j21 outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other [I Denied Access
Date of Visit: -) Arrival Time: Departure Time. County:
Farm Name: A)�116_Lle—Ll 61L�a_A— — Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: A,
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = =' =ds Longitude: =0=4 =4;
,wine
IN le 1KL1M=fnjPt�11'1
-ign u t
c I ulation
e �tPq q JI t �rli
y
D s i 16
I
c
u ent
C. i
p lation
En.
Design n
attle UO-apacl P
'Aopulati
40,
D Wean to Finish
�er
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf _j
Dairy Heifei
El Dry Cow
D Non -Dairy
El Beef Stocket
E] Beef Feeder
113 Beef Brood Cowl
Num 0 of S uctur s:
Wean to Feeder
n-Layet
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
ers
El Farrow to Finish
Ej Gilts
-Layers
Pullets
10
-Boars
El Turkeys
he- -rA El Turkey Poults
1[-] Oth r I 1 10 Other
Dischar- & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes
2<0-' 0 NA
[I NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
0 Yes
2No [:1 NA
El NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
D Yes
E3<o [:1 NA
[I NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Elyes
No 0 NA
[] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Yes
��o NA
El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
E] Yes
o El NA
[I NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Numbe Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
El Yes ZfNo 1E] NA El NE
El Yes No El NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
El Yes ffNo El NA 0 NE
El Yes NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
"4'
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes � No [I NA [:] NE
8. Do any oft . he stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'! El Yes �2 �No NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) �9
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require �0
maintenance or improvement? El Yes ;No E-1 NA El NE
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes ZrNo NA El NE
maintenance/improvement? 7>1
I L Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No [I NA [I NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
Ej PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Dritl D Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 4-e-Y6610 � 0� 4,jdt�-,, SA-"3,e 4,1".
13. Soil type(s) h 0 r (--d I (
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
El Yes
El Yes
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination', El Yes
IT Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes
VKPIn,"13 0111 PG1_*,kr5 C--rw"
ETNo 0 NA
[3<o , El NA
[��No -ONA
[��o E] NA
� �0_ El NA
EJ NE
El NE
F-1 NE
El NE
El NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name I! ",,�
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: L/Z 2_o/
1212 81'0 4 Continued

Facility Numberf —3 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
0 Yes
No NA El NE
z 10
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
11 Yes
o ONA ONE
;' 0
the appropirate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0Yes
OETNo El NA ONE
• Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis [:1 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers
El Annual Certification
• Rainfall 0 Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections [:1 Monthly and 1
Rain Inspections
0 WW her Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge9
EJ Yes
�No 0 INA NE
� �NA
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
0 No NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
[-I No 13'N NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
El Yes
EINo NA ONE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0 Yes
No D NA NE
27. Did the facili fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
[I No ;2 [-1 NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes El No El NA [__1 NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
El No
0 NA
El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
0 No
El NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
0 Yes
El No
El NA
0 NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, firceboard problems, over application)
32. Did Rev i ewer/] nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
0 No
El NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
kj j4 4 A�"
12128104
12128104

Z
0 erQu i y
larDivision, f wat, al
Al
i'lacAi Aiuir�ber
0 Division of Soil a d W rya ion,:
n a.tcrConse., t'
0 Other Agency
J..
Type of Visit �rCoTmopljarrd—einspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit j2rRoutine OComplaint OFollowup OReferral OErnergency 00ther El Denied Access
Date of Visit: ArrivalTimed 1�27- Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 7—v ±� LA I/ oi Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: e�2 Operator Certification 'Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =0 =( =u Longitude: = 0
-Design
t $
)c
urrenf_3 gU ,,i , urren
Design-, urr n
Sw ine"
etf6ultr�
a e
:C'a'0acit�.!­,,'�opii'1At 041 tt
Ca paci P
011i
Tin—,
FEI �Vean io 5
Layer
El Dairy Co w
_,,k�Wa
%,an-t_o"Feeder
]LJ Non -Layer
El Dairy Calf
6 OFeeder to Finish
0
El Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
10
4, '.,:Dry Poultry
D Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
El Non -Dairy
D Farrow to Finish
Layers
El Beef Stocker
Gilts
D Non -Layers
Beef Fee der
Boars
El Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
4' Turkeys
ther
r e, Po Its
El T k u
1E] Other
E] 01
'he
u , rn er of
6 S
tiUiureis'.:`�,�
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes Z/No EINA ONE
Discharge originated at: EJ Structure El Application Field F Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? E]Yes N [I NA [I NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) El Yes NA El NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) E]Yes El NA El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes o El NA El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State El Yes No [] NA El NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

r .. i;�
I Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural fteeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 1;2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
D Yes OIN4 NA 0 NE
0
El Yes No 0 NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
.9�_
El Yes 1�1�0 NA D NE
El Yes 2<o___E1NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th
.7re"otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes I No El NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the Oermit? Yes No LJ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes No El NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need []Yes 2/No �NA EINE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No [0] NA [I N E
Excessive Pending 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground [I Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN [:1 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus [I Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Area
12, Crop type(s) 5-6t,_e .: q -4 /*,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 Yes
C]Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? [] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [3 Yes
NA
El NE
N �0
oj[ljl N A
El NE
El NA
FNq
[1) NE
0 LJ NA
Zt
E NE
0 [:1 NA
7
[__1 N I,
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES'answers and/or any recommendations or;anv,otfie� com . ments
7
"Use drawings of facility to better explain situ ns.(useadditio6a pages as'necessar
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 31&Zr 4-
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: (�Y,, —_3� 1 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. M 1171 Tt) M r-t' ii�]; * F1 n ; M AA M n
11 0 a VO rpx apa
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, Ll Yes NA U NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
EIRainfall OStocking [:]CropYield [:1120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and V Rain Inspections E]WeatherCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes ZNZ NA El NE
o
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes No El NA NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes 9NA NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 11 Yes /�NO NA El NE
NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes 6 El NA
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? El Yes XrNo El NA 0 NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 0 Yes E]No [:1 NA j__1 NE
El Yes O'NoO-NA El NE
0
El Yes No El NA El NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
El No
[:1 NA
[:1 NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
[I No
F-1 NA
El NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
E3 No
[] NA
El NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 10 qj�� I DepartureTime: County: Region;
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
2
Integrator: )41 ( ?
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
'
CC,
esigr - UPF
—f�Piipi
' ".3
W E
esio ent
?
!#
"t nt
D. pj—
C P.
a ci!
C j!
apaiii; P lation
'o
C aci opulation
o Finish
er
Cow
o-Feeder
-La e,
alf
ErFeeder to Finish
I
I
El Dairy Heifei
_j
-1
Farr ow to Wean
El Dry Cow
0
El Farrow to Feeder
ers
El Non -Dairy
El Beef Stocket
. i
El Farrow to Finish
Gilts
-Layers
El Beef Feeder
I
Boars
El Fullets
Turkeys
El Beef Brood Cowl
e
El Turkey Poultsl
Num e o'
Discharp,es & Stream Impacts
I.- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes
eNo El NA
[I NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure 0 Application Field [1 Other
a. Was the conveyance rnan-made?
El Yes
2No, [:1 NA
El NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Yes
� �No NA
NE
c. What is the estimated Volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[--]Yes
XfN NA
NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El yes
N El NA
[:1 NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
E] Yes
VNo El NA
[__1 NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
El Yes
.0-No 0 NA
El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
El Yes
� �No D NA
D NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
El Yes
Z/No El NA
El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
�No
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
El Yes
[:1 NA
[:1 NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th at, notify DWQ
r"
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? D Yes 2NNoXD NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0
0 Yes o [31NA [] NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
V
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0
maintenance or improvement? [] Yes �eNo [] NA Ej NE
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need E] Yes o D.NA [:1 NE
maintenance/improvement?
o D
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ZE: NA (] NE
D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground ED Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
OPAN [:1 PAN> 10%or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Dritl El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) t54-e4,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
Dyes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes
[3 No,..,[] NA
D NE
N NA
D NE
N NA
El NE
No -1 El NA
El NE
EIN�o El NA
El NE
Reviewerlinspector Name _Ct�.
�� Phone: /7/ - Y_ 4�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
S
(&ij e---Z
Date: i 4� Q - /_ C) ­3 - --- 1
12128104 Continued

Facility'&umberl�a Date of Inspection
Reciii1red Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Pen -nit readily available? Yes . "No - NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes No NA NE
the appropirate box. D WUP El Checklists El Design [3 Maps 0 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box betow. El Yes NA El NE
El Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard E:1 Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and I" Rain Inspections El eather Code
L' .'
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes ZND NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? D Yes N NA NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes NA Ej NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? E] Yes Po [:],N'A' El NE
26� Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes N [:1 NA E:1 NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ED Yes jNo 0 NA El NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes El No El NA D NE
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
D Yes
[:1 No
DNA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
0 yes
El No
D NA
El NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
El No
El NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
D Yes
[:1 No
[:1 NA
[:1 NE
'.and/or,Draw ngs,-, . .. .....
qmmenisk
S,
ki4 �Ei
12128104

3
Type of Visit t�) co Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit �rftutlne OComplaint OFollowup OReferral OErnergency 00ther 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: L&LO I Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: fto U peyz�, Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: _.Title:
Onsite Representative: ly�lntegrator:
Phone No:
Certifled Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
1. 'Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
1".-Other
�hcr
Region:
I Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [=0 = =s Longitude: =0=4 =11
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population WetPoultry Capacity Population
10 Layer I I
10 Non -Layer I
Dry Poultry
El Layers
El Non -Layers
El Pullets
El Turkeys
El Turkey Poults
FE-10ther
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
El Dairy Cow
El Dairy Calf
I
El Dairy Heifej
E] Dry Cow
El Non -Dairy
El Beef Stockei
El Beef Feeder
El Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures:
b, Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volurne that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
E]Yes ZNo 01 NA El NE
El Yes ErNo INA El NE
El Yes N Voo [--:] NA El NE
11 Yes
0 Yes
1:1 Yes
NE
NE
El NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: � =—
Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
El Yes
0 NA
El NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
;No [01 NA
F-1 NE
the appropirate box. 0 WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps D Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
ONo [j NA
[:1 NE
El Waste Application E:1 Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers
El Annual Certification
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and V
Rain Inspections El eatherCode
22,
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0 Yes
zNo"t NA
EINE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
�N�o NA
El NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
� �0"o NA
0 NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0 Yes
VN� ' NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
o -Is
No NA
Fo[0:
[I NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
E]Yes
N I N A
[I NE
Otherlssues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes El No El NA [I NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
[:1 No
[] NA
0 NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
[] No
[:1 NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative inu-nediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
[:1 Yes
[:1 No
E] NA
El NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
[I No
E] NA
[I NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[I Yes
El No
[] NA
El NE
lAdditional Comments and/or Drawings: I
12128104

I
Facility Number:b6-;:­,3
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
El Yes
ONo NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
El Yes
�N�oD NA [I NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
El Yes
47 fNo EINA D NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
�oCl
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
El Yes
J2 NA El NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threa otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
E]Yes
0 N
;n A D NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
0 Yes
o El NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
D Yes
o El NA D NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
El Yes
0 A El NE
C2�
maintenance/improvement?
;:o
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Yes
01 NA El NE
D Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
El PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
[:1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Dritl D Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
^ei #-41
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes EJ'No 'lNA El N I,
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ��No'NA D NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'.',[] Yes A El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes VON A D NE
0 1 [:3
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 11 Yes DNA D NE
ij 11111111II111111
I A,1111111�111��' III jilill
01nmenN re eVto,--quesUon,,#):- 'Eiplaiilan"��,YES �nswers in'Wor�any r&omi fiendbtl' s o an ot 11 1 11 �!", 11! 1
,�ob n s o r X het
"lain sit"tiins.� (use�addifio�n
,a in sr4rigienit- 0
xto bettev�ex aF
P ,page�,asmecessai�y
-� �_ t,/ c, 4 P_ c1Z_ an b �os-e_e iF 51&dj-X_
b d-,q -1 &" _r 0 - tp�� 14*-r r 4P j C
—c/Z 06)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 79/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J, "-Z) I— e— Date:
12128104 Continued

M
MEMM
14D,R6-utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -kip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 7/0 0
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted E3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified J3 Registered 1[3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: ........ ........................................... County: -7 1
................ X, A
.......... .................... .......................
Owner Name:
............... Phone No: .......................................................................................
Facility Contact ...........
......................................................... I itle: ................................................................ Phone No: ......... 5?9 -
............................... I ........
MailingAddress . ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative . ....... �k.!qn ........................................ I ..... Integrator: ... coy zz_� .....................................................
Certified Operator . .................. ........... . ......................... Operator Certification Number:,, ............. ......... I ..... I
Location of Farm: A6
.................................................................................................... I.: ............ ..................................................
............................ ........................................................... . ................................................................................................................................................................................
1111-1-1 ...... ..................................................... 1-1-11--.1 .... I- .. D..
Latitude Longitude
jsikjj�:�': �Ctjrr
r en D
Design�­ Cui ri t" Desigh Current ent
!qat C'
Swine Capa�ity; Poultry
Tooidation. Capacity Population Population
E] Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer I I E] Dairy I
P,56-eder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I 1E] Non -Dairy I
Farrow to Wean
C] Farrow to Feeder Other
jl­� Farro�v to Finish U, ii" "E F
,,,TotqFDeMt!n,Capaci, f��,
ICI Gilts
T o t A I S S LW,,
1[:] Boars
,Number of Lakoo�.s J'� 10 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I[] Spray Field Arm]',
Holding Ponds SolidiTr�p'
El No Liquid Waste Management Systen___i
Discharges & Stream impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes eN o
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [:1 Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? C3 Yes tj <No
b. Irdischarge is observed, did it reach Water ofthe Sta(e? (If'yes, notify DWQ) F-1 Yes � �No
c. It'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systern? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: if
Freeboard(inches): ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ....
,,5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
0 Yes El"No
' Y iNo
es No
0
Yes 0
Yes '��o
Structure 6
... ..............
E . I .. Y . e . S . ��o
Continued on back

Facility Number: 3 1 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or mariaged through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes '2<�
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/i m prove me nt?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ApPliaktion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding E] PAN
12. Crop type /Pi
0 Yes 0
El Yes 0
0 Yes No
El Yes No
No
E] Yes 0
L<
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes 0
EFNO
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes 0
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes
15. Does'the receiving crop need improvement? 0 Yes N
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? El Yes N o
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? Yes o
.JZ <N
18. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) El Yes
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie� irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Yes
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes N
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? El Yes [3/No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [] Yes
23. Did Reviewer[Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspicction with on -site representative? Yes L7�JNo-
24. Does facility.require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes
25. W any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes No
h, i s, 'v' i's it'; .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..............
....................................
Lis -V I .....................................
irisoibTide�c'e'.AO'U'fth" ' is't' ....... .........
,c "V .�� . , � I ", , '. , , ,,­ I � ,,, ", i, �& i�� hlilwil
ieAt§(jrefek1t6,&es
Omm S'answersan or,anyrecommen aions�orra ",,!�ot er c6mmen �t; tF
e 0 e,"er exp aj s
�'(usie additi�naf
U *awings 6fifacilit I ­6::'ft6adons�. gesias necessar3
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Fadlity Number: Date ofinspection
I .
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below cs 'No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? :E1 Yes No
0
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? Yes 0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i,e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan bladc(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Yes ��No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged rill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes Z-N--o
Additional,Comments�and/or-I)rawinF.�:;,
T
J,
A.1

',A� , �!44
r
jivisibn, of Wate -Quality
Pivision of Soil and Watei Couservati.6n
'O�-Other A&ftcy
-:J,
iType of Visit compno
upee'Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ,,�Outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other [j Denied Ace I ess
4 "
Fad * Number )ate of Visit-, 0 Time: Printed on: 10/26/2000
ro Not�(Ogcrational 0 BelowThreshold
Wermitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold . .........................
Farm Name: ..... 4 7 0'—_ . ...... County: .............................................................. .......................
. ............... .......... . .................................. ......
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No: .......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. . fitle: ........................................................... _... Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .....
. . ................................. Integrator:.4foh
. . . . .............................................................
.... V.. It S
Certified Operator: ............... j ....... A ... Operator Certification Number . .....................................
.......... .............................................................
Location of Farm:
C] Swine [] Poultry [] Cattle [:1 Horse Latitude 1 11 Longitude 0 6 14
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[] Wean to Feeder JE] Layer Dairy I
CjTccdcr to Finish JE3 Non Layeir Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder JCI Other I
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Gilts
Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
10 Subsurface Drains Present irn -Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area
IF­1 No Liouid Waste Manaeement Svstem I
Discharge & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: Lagoon El Spray Field 0 Other
a. II'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is oh.served, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. II'discharge is observed. what is the CS[itnated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? [] Spillway
Structure I StRiCture 2 Struclure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier 7 'A I
D Ye:;No
El Yes 21�0�
Z '
0 Yes No
El Yes wer So
El Yes �f ��No
El Yes ' ' 0
E] Yes N Zoo
Structure 6
................ .. ........... I .................. . ........................ .......................... ........ ...................... ....................................
Freeboard (hiches):
5/00 Continued on back

lFacility Numbe!Cd. — 3 2 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poser, an
immediate public bealth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? I
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? [] Excessive Ponding [:J PAN [] Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 0
,eiy, P,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
C) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0,0hic'kn, vie
s-w
orp pioced. dwiog s.visit; - Yoo'Will -teb iw od . tbor:
..................................
..................................
i6irisb6fide flke' abiiiA this'Visit.". -'. ..................................
13 YesX_N__o
0 Yes
[I Yes etl-No
0
0 Yes
0
0 Yes
Yes ;�No
0 Yes 0 No
Yes No
C] Yes 0
Yes
C] Yes ��No�
Yes 0
0
0 Yes
Yes X'N-<o
0
Yes
Yes
Yes j;No
Yes :NZ
0 Yes 0
Yes 0
0
El Yes 0
El Yes No

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Imues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on'neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Z-yes E3 No
Yes Z-No
Yes 0
[J Yes ON-o
Yes 0
o
Yes No
o
Yes �No
5100
n

Type of Visit 0 Compl' ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
P' c
Reason for Visit 2outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other Denied Access
Facility Number I Date of Visit: 'rime:
[3 Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold -
Farm Name: _j_Q — I � I ( y W I? I ( 1VO.— County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ZZ It
Location of Farm -
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator: 1:2
Operator Certification Number:
El Swine 0 Poultry ElCattle E]HorseLatitude 0 4 66 Longitude 4 66
Design Current.
Swine Capacity Population
El Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
El Gifts
Ej Boars
.... . . ... .
Holding Ponds Solid Trios
Design Current Design Current
P ultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
10 Layer I JE] Dairy I I
IEJ Non-Laxer I 1LJ Non -Dairy I I
IEJ other I
Total Design Ca . pacity
Total, SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present JjElLagoonAres JC1 Spray Field Are.jrl
­ 10 No Liquid Waste Management Sj�stem�L_::,_
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: EI Lagoon 0 Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. tf discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
waste conection & Treatmen
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 lee
Yes
E]Yes ZIN,
El Yes
El Yes
El Yes
El Yes
El Yes ,0 No
Structure 6
Continued

. A.
I Facility Number: �,& — _3 :a
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stucturcs lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintcnanec/improvcment?
11. Is there evidence of over application? El Excessive Ponding El PAN El Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type C—i-rc-
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designatedin the Ccrtifi
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
F
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ iff igation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, fireeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[3 Yes O-No
Yes aN,
El Yes E21 Go'
El Yes
0 Yes
Yes No
Yes No
El Yes
Cl Yes
El Yes
El Yes
F1 Yes
0 Yes
0 Yes
El Yes
El Yes
El Yes
D Yes
N Vo'
Ej No
No
O'No
;�No
-No
El Yes
0 Yes � �0
o
E] Yes ��N�,
El Yes �Z�
FE-3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Ei0lain fihv,YES answers and/or any re'66mmentlatioi i At, yg
�0� 0 OT Sk.
"..,f'fa"cillitpt6�Wetti�r.'eitplain situations. (use addition I p, ges �'i
so a a Qsne E �3F iecrl d C o i ial Notes
. . ........... . ............ . .. .. .
Rev !ewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Ir
ZOI
05103101 f Continued

[Type of Visit Or Complig=6 Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 32Moutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other El Denied Access
F t3rNumber DateofVisit: IA/WoYlTime:
F017—operational. 0 Below Thr;�_K_old_
.,p �er tted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
_7 County: .............................................................. .......................
Farm Name: ...... . . ... ��= ..............................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:
FacilityContact . .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ........................................... .......
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................... I n t e g r a t o r:
....... ........................................................
Certified Operator: ...... T ........................................ Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Lacation of Farm:
[3 Swine Cj Poultry Cj Cattle [3 Horse Latitude 0 4 49 Longitude 4 44
Discharges & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon [3 Spray Field T-1 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obseTved, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUn-dn?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Coflection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm, storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
0 Yes .0_90�"
0 Yes U11401
0 Yes wo
i X
Yes 1��o
Yes �zo
El Yes ��X'O'
0 Yes 0
Structure 6
Identifier:
Frecboard (inches):
12112103
................................... ................................... .................. I ................. ....... I ........................... ................................... ...................................
1_14
Continued

IFacility &umber: I., � — —4 � I Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
E] Yes [311��o
0 Yes P40
El Yes 0<0�
El Yes N
C1 Yes No
!No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? 0 Yes P �0�
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes � �0
[] Excessive Ponding [] PAN [] Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground [3 Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type 0ol4o�izer,,-,
13. Do the receiving crops diff�r with thdse designated in the Certi
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
f
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?.
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
Yes _0<0
Yes 0
Yes El No
0 Yes [3 N
El Yes �No
El Yes V0
[I Yes 07-No
Yes 0<�
o/
D Yes Z�'
[:] Yes-�XNc
_to
A6
5
Reviewer/Inspector Name
g
1 31
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: caz a Z
12112103 n(ij—.4

FacHity Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
F_] Yes
Q-No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
0 Yes
ONo
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Yes
14�
[] Waste Application [3 Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
0 Yes
U-N-6-
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
El Yes
0
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
1111o__
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
ou
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 Yes
�O No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
Yes
.[2'11_0�
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
rl No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes
0 No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
El Yes
[:1 No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
0 Yes
[:1 No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes
El No
[3 Stocking Form [] Crop Yield Form 0 Rainfall [I Inspection After I " Rain
0 120 Minute Inspections [] Annual Certification Form
12112103

k - — a
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Anne Hollowell
Location: 810 Big John's Store Rd., Seaboard NC 27876
Telephone:
Type Operation: Topping ZERO HOGS
Number of Animal Units: 1150 ZERO HOGS
Y6
RRO
-�jal VED I DENR I DVVQ
Aquifer Proterfinn Sarftn
APR 0 12009
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface
and/or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste
utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer
value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste
based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be
applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management
facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 1 5A NCAC 2H.0217
adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
This plan has been developed to provide the necessary documentation that there is adequate land available
to land apply the necessary waste water that will be generated by rainfall accumulating in the existing swine
waste lagoon while ZERO HOGS are housed at the facility for any one year period. The volume of rainwater
has been calculated using the most excessive 150 day accumulation of water less evaporation then
extrapolated for a full year. This will over estimate the actual accumulated water for normal years however it
will provide extra protection for above normal rainfall years.
It is estimated that 451,785 gallons will accumulate with approximately .74
pounds of nitrogen per 1000 gallons annually. This will generate 334.32 ponds
of nitrogen that will be removed as a function of removing the excess rainfall
water. It will be necessary to continue to pull samples for testing of the
waste water to monitor the future nitrogen content. It is expected that over
time the nitrogen content will begin to decline slightly due to no additional
waste being added.

It will be very important to continue to observe the temp. storage levels and
plan to manage the needed pumping to keep water out of the freeboard area. You
should also consider and plan for wet seasons and hurricane season.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to
apply the waste in a timely manner.
ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Real
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs.N
Months
Type
Yld./Ac
per
Used
Applied
acre
431
Pull D
NoA
Fescue
4.3 T
50
7.0
1505
Sept I-
hay/orcha
Apr 30
rdgrass
Pull A
GoA
Coastal
6.5 T
50
8.0
1950
Mar I -
Bermuda
X�5%
Sept 30
hay -
Pull A
GoA
Smali
50
8.0
400
Oct 1-
gr over
Mar 31
Pull E
GoA
Fescue
4.3 T
50
5.0
1075
Aug 1-
hay
July 31
Total
4530
Pulls A,D and E will handle 4530 pounds of nitrogen annually. With ZERO HOGS at
the facility an estimated 334.32 pounds of residual nitrogen will be pumped out
on to the receiving fields as part of removing the excess rain water for a
period of one year. The owner will close the facility as soon as cost share
funds are available to assist with the closure. There are ample acres of
pasture and hay land available to handle the waste annually until the closure is
carried out.
The small grain winter cover on pull A was not included in the nitrogen
calculation total however it will remain as a open option.

* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied,
they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation. -
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements,
This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrients or other elements,
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of wastewater.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Fieid Soil Type Crop Application Application
No. Rate(In/Hr) Amount(In.)
Pull D
Norfolk
Fescue hay
/orchard grass
0.5
1.0
Pull A
Goldsboro
Coastal
Bermuda
hay/small
grain overseed
0.5
1.0
Pull F
Goldsboro
Fescue hay
0.5
1.0
This table is not needed if waste is not being applied by irrigation, however a similar table will be needed for
dry litter or sludge,
Your facility is designed for 150 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on
the average of once every 5 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your
structure exceed Elevation 98.6.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service or the Northampton Soil and Water Conservation
District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount per acre
to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.

Narrative of Operation: This swine operation has been depopulated and is in the process of
obtaining closure assistance. This plan has been developed to provide the owner guidance to
manage the existing swine waste lagoon until the lagoon closure is completed.
Waste will be applied to bermuda, fescue. Grazing means intensive grazing, to get grazing not intensive
grazing use 75% of the hay rate. If the cows are remove from the pastures there will still be excessive lend
for waste disposal,

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of adequate.
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not
own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a
copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables
at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 ton per
acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at more
than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass
filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field.
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application, Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding. (See "Weather and climate in N.C." for guidance.)
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control
odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.

9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to depth that would
prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste
should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm
shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and
any perennial stream or river other than an irrigation ditch or canal.
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present (See Standard
393-Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved
as a land applications site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste
applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates and in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers.
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system. I
17, A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation
such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected
regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.

18. If animal production at the facility is to be or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills,
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied
preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
21, Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all
waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the
liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years and a liquid waste analysis
be taken at least twice each year consistent with waste utilization
plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Anne Hollowell
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know
that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or
construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe
than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of
the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Anne Hollowell
�-z
Signature:A,t-i�-j6-----3;vo-�&-tz� Date. —
Technical Representative: William P. Boone
Affiliation: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Address Agency: P.O. Box 218
Jackson N.C. 27845
252-534-2591
le
Signature: Z,�), Date:

. . 0!
INA
le
4r
k,
IV
................
IV
ILI 0., 2

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Ann B. Hollowell
Hollowell Farm
810 Big John Store Rd.
Seaboard, NC 27876
Dear Ann B. Hollowell:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
August 14, 2009
Dee Freeman
Secretary
1 EE
;fldi AW 1 8 2M
;DENIR ROUU-
Subject: Permit No. AW166003 8
Hollowell Fann
Animal Waste Management System
Northampton County
In accordance with your March 30, 2009 request for a zero animal permit, we are hereby for -warding to
you this Permit issued to Ann B. Hollowell authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system, You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to zero until such
time as the waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no, longer wished to maintain it
as an active swine farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Hollowell Farm, with an annual capacity of no greater than an annual
average of zero (0) Swine.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 2014 and replaces the COC No.
AWS510059 issued to this facility on October 1, 2004. You are subject to the conditions of this permit
until the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a letter to
the Division of Water Quality to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure
of all contairiment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 011 I(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a I 00-ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1636 Mail Service Cente,, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Locatim 272B Capital 83vd,, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] � FAX: [phone] k Customer service: 1-877-623-6748 NorffiCarohna
Internet! www.nowaterquality.org 'V
An Ecual 0m)ortoriq k Affirma6vp Action Employp.r
I/ aturally

0 0
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AW1660038

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL SWINE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Am B. Hollowell
Northampton County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Hollowell Farm,
located in Northampton County, consisting of zero (0) Swine and the application to land as specified in
the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 2014 and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
1. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface, waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25 -year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15 A, Subehapter 2B, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAQ and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.

0 0
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCOS) 143-215.1 OB(l) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Perinit prior to modification of the Facility.
5. Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case -by -case basis by the Division.
H. 'OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare, soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Wasbdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not barm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
8. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations,
9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.

0 0
10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments, All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12, Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times- (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. 'No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17� Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events, The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
18. ' Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test 1ndex for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre),
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.
U1. MONITORING AND REPORTING REOVIREMENTS
An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequencyto insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other. structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge,

9. 0
2. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
3.- A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application.
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
4. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record
the off -site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
5. if, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition 111. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c, Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition 111. 3.

0 0
A copy of this Permit, the Facilitys permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.
Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permlittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements,
Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events-,
a. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
b. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V, 2, of this Permit.
Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
d. Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
e. Any failure of the animal waste management system that renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses.an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to

0
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.
iV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
2. The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25-year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if.- (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
3, Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) North Carolina Standardfor Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.

0 0
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure,
4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit,
This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification Qf Change Qf
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
6. The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
7. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A "
NCAC 02T .0 111 (c). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of -1 5A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
V1. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Pennittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1 The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
3. It shall not be a defense for a Pennittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 14th day of August, 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
fior Coleen H. Sullins, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AW1660038

STAIZ
FILE COPY
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street * Raleie, North Carolina 276D4
Jwves: R Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan R Howes, Secie ry
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 26, 1993
Mr. Tom Hollowell
Route 1, Box 182
Seaboard, NC 27876
Subject: Complaint Inspection
Hollowell Hog Operation
Turner's Crossroads
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
On March 16, 1993 Mr. Karl Shaffer of the Raleigh Regional
office conducted an inspection of your hog operation in
Northampton County. The inspection was prompted by an anonymous
complaint concerning'wastewater handling at the facility.
Mr. Shaffer's inspection revealed that your facility was
being properly operated and maintained. No discharge or evidence
of past discharges of wastewater was seen during the visit. Ms.
Hollowell was present during the inspection. She showed Mr.
Shaffer the land application system and described overall system
operation.
Should you need further information, please contact Mr.
Shaffer at [phone].
Sincerely,
Timoth L E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jack Moore- Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short- Northampton County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. Steve Bennett- NC Division of Soil and Water
Conservation
pl) pm 276g7, Rdeo, Nw+ Crahm 2761176s7 Tdeowm 9i9-7334M Fax [phone]
An Eqwl Opp)mmity Affirmatw &-dw EmOmAr