660034_PERMIT FILE_20171231

r
3
Type of Visit: (0 Complnspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: QrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
I II � IIII II�I��I I III IIIII II IIII I �
Date of Visit:'�'-�' Arrival Time: 'Departure Time: ® County: Region:
Farm Name: %'� ��j A1)2, n 1* ! / Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
E
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: CA%Lt/ 44p—eW Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
CurON rent
Design Current
Design Current
party
PuP
iWtet Poultry
aplace�lyl
P°pip
G�attleaty
PL�oy1�p8.tli€ean
to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
ean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
rFeeder
to Finish
Dai Heifer
w to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
rrow to Feeder
D , P.oult
Ca aci
1?0
Non-Dai
rrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
lts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other`,
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
I.IMIMIwRePttEtl
Fwlwnuu�lQM'wn.wwxa»wtµ�lf.vs[nvinel
HehllMllwiNnblw
fW€4wwelwww�if yglow.�e.wnylw.pyW,uyNtg5Mlf4'€�FMs�llulywll.�+�
Discharges and Stream Impacts
O
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[] Yes
No NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes��Noo
NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
N NA
6
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Faeility N6mber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? r ❑ Yes VN <NN
❑NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
6(4C�Q Su.►-I/QY
aior>���s
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
2 -Lz-08
'�- 27 —t ?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
[]NA ❑NE
Phone: 4 11 -M j y2do
Reviewer/inspector Signature: j:J Z'5
Page 3 of 3
Date: f D - 2
21412015

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection: 0-2. —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes DNA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes rDNA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): J ��
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
'Z
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ YesFNoE]
NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required butlers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ EvidenceofWind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): % yl >.
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
gNo
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ A ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Na ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

a- 6-(4
Type of Visit: AZ) Com . ce Inspection O Operation Review p Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 2rRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: O ` j Departure Time: ® County: Region:
Farm Name: 6r S I I Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: L A-Q- 62tx e$ ►L Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
I Layer
]Non -Layer
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dr, P�oultr, Ca acit P,o .
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes OINO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
E1,N ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
a NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
EltNo
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - S c Date of Ins ection: 67 —,497
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in}; 2 YIt
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[] Yes
No NA
❑ NE
(i.e,, large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmFNo
eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit`? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 570 r<)A �," , W cr n &Ld $4, I-)n 4 r 4 l el - r / G'-014-611-
--J �- I
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
NA
0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
011 [] NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ YesPNX
❑NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box,
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste TigEj
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectiSludge
Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes❑
NA
[] NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Fatili .Nymber: - 3 ' Date of Inspection: L
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge'? If yes, check ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comnnents'(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or' any other comments.
Use drawings -of facility td better explain- situations (use additional pages as necessary).
S1X1dSe SurP,eY A-(- 17- /wl
iV- S� �� Z3
�- M1 _ (_
pr 7-30-
roaY
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0k S` 4e- 1p'LJje—,
Page 3 of 3
Phone: -7
Date: I ~I (Q
21412015

/o-(,2-r
4Type of Visit: O Co fiance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: p 1 Tj Arrival Time: © Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: r--812r.. 11 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: COt a 4Q1x ee_,✓ Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design r1rent
Swine a acit-v= Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry C1ty Pop.
Layer I
Design C►urrent
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Feeder to Finish
arrow to Wean 2-
.1-7 8
Design Current
Dr, P,Oult , Ca aci P,n ..
Layers
Non -Layers
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes to
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility umber: li� L Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 Zlt 411
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment h eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes /No❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
LLJ o ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YesVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: 6 to JDate of Inspection: —g
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [3 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non -co xipliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Expla1njany YES answers, and/or any, additional reddmmendations�or;any' therlcotninents
Use �draydings,°af;facili ` to"better;explain slkuatlon's, (use additional pages -as necessary) �E, e , t „ � a. � . ��: x'
ti �� (moo ►4 '� - 7
.7u rVQ.,y
IV - 6,.5-3 1,/ - r•17
d - 5.0 C) s zi a
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,p Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:Gc�j�/1�—
Date: _40 --q —17
2/4/2015
Page 3 of 3

for Visit: 0 Routine
0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0
0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: —/- Arrival Time:--�-�y+w Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: (2 0 e t- i f Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry
Wean to Finish La er
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,oult .
Design C►urrent
Ca aci P■o ,
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
keys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No 'NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: •
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �[_] NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr t; notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑, NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): j9 e j- �Gs. J-/; , 3�. 14-11 f
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
• ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

' Facility Number: 113ate of Inspection: '- S
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
❑NA
❑NE
Comments (refer to question.#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, any other comments.
Use drawings offacility.to better explain'situations (use additional pages as necessary).
GuhiP fi9.I4-
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L3 6z S J��
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7/(� �Z(3
Date: -3
21412011

Type of Visit: AD Compl cc inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
.0, R/I
Reason for Visit: 1outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: --1 — Arrival Time: L/ 5 1 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: tlOwner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 0 1i e e y
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wet Poultry
La er
Design C►urrent
Capacity Pop.
Cattle
DairyCow
Design C►urrent
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dr. P,aultr.
I Layers
Design Current
Ca acit Pao P.
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Othe11 illill
Other F
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
3Vo ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
R3Vo NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: f - �� t. Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
[:]Yes
No A
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): � / 6 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑Yes
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes:�NoO
NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
th t, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
A
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�oFoA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
<O ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
1;'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C_v V f' f <J d L/ ;e q n S , , J pS-, (fir r/
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesVN
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
gj No NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box,
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sl e Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate Inste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
J 61 rvQ.t� Zrfr �Y
O
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
s ko- �vr.,,� c
Phone:
Date:
21412014

L
(Type of Visit: ,�C 7Routine
ance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
sit:Reason for Vi� Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: �— V Arrival Time: Departure Time:® County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Co ¢ (9+\ed.&1 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Curreut Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultr"Wiffiky Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
ke s
ke Poults
tO
er
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes !EJ ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D WQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
ElYes
F ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
L.
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - . L Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes hlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes J217No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etY(No"
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of AcceptableCrop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): SO ti bown x , ",%*4
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 o ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�l o ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ YeseN
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [3 Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis C] Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yesd>0`1:1 NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

jFacility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
[] NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any,other,comments..
Use drawings: of facility, to better explain situations (use additional pages as, necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: / Ze, k
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
lcrt�.
Date: C 2 —1 Jr_ 1 $�
21412011

Type of Visit: _,Q Coance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: /3 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: f7j S k z Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: t 1m,/ �14 Cc h I �G_4,*V y- �✓ �Qj�' 4rl �' Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultay Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Design
Cattle Capacity
Dairy Cow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean Design Current
Farrow to Feeder Dr. P,oultr. Ca achy P,o
Farrow to Finish Layers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

IFacHity Number: L Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): (,
—of-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Ef7No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[—]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
N�oNA
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Vj"N/❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Sala"v`, rigs 4 (A ! er,-z ti d o :
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes2f�N�oD NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Ld No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
6 No ❑ NA
D NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers [] Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

rkl(fl
Facility Number: -7 I Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
K❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑NA
V
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
gNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No []NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain -'any YES sanswers and/or any additional recommendationsfor any,"other°com nenfs."� r'�,1�
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary-)'..' M ,
SIL j SC"1(0-(ir 13
Pr 1 - �V
SS e c .
U
(, _ (,7- 1 3
0 % 5-, 2 l
lv
.a- d C/ rC- i b /v;�J, 0-k 5 � a s
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: . (�} La S k _ /V I e
Page 3 of 3
Phone: -7 cJ l -qzo Q
Date: �/ 3 /-1 3 _
21412011

Type of Visit: 0 Com ' nce Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
/ 7A1�1
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: L L Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: iY� �!j f" r► jZ�-• Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: two— r m� ECG✓
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Wean to Finish
I Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
[Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Z Design
Current Dry Cow
FUrow to Feeder
D , P,oult . C►.a aci
P.a Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
harrow to Finish
Layers
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
OtherI Turkey Poults
Other I Other
Region:
Discharees and Stream Imoacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ YesjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesrNo
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): /
5. Are there any immediate threats to theintegrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
ZI No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes YNO NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes :No
No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acce-ptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �!%I kr�. APle'"t- 044--
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
LLJX❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfe ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectio ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �/_o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: (+ 2r
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(cs) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA [3 NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional°recommendations or any'other•,,comments _ � r = 11
Use drawings;offacilityto.betterexplainasituations,(useadditional pages: as necessary) „.3, �f°` ,r i:V `'�;, `.,, i;
�r3 4S 7f JA-r l9 LI 0tre_ ---
0
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: -7q /rVZ04
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (74.
Page 3 of 3
Date: VIQ f'L--
21412011

2(I l U
3
(Type of Visit: QJCo once Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: C) Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access it
Date of Visit:
�1 i--t 1--Eu
Arrival Time: ®
Departure Time: County:
Farm Name;
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: C-11 i21 C I-te, h Integrator;
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Design Current Design C►urcent
Wet Poultry C•aQacity Pop; Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farr o Feeder
Dr, P,oultr. Ca ,aei P,o
Non -Doi
arrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Ft_her
Turke Poults
her
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes [3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from'any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [%f ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: ft 11—i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
_
Observed Freeboard (in): Z P
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
2TNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ YesVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ZfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Z No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift D Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): C,9 11 n 60— r Al L"_ d �
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ICJ LVO ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VN ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
14. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
ZN❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: - j Date of Ins ection. (/ t l
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA [3 NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? El Yes;;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
C, tr'al recommendations.or ony,other commentsl" K i i Comments ( referao question #): _Explatn any YES answez rs andlor any,ad'tlitio
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (useadditional pages as necessarv):: ': f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ReviewerAnspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: Ili 21 1 1 1
21412011

L
f Visit PCompl' a Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: � Departure Time: County:
r
Farm Name: LA f2z!n Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: G
Certified Operator: _ , '­_ Gab(G Q
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = 0 41 Longitude: 0 e = g = {5
Design Current
Design [at WpX
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry CaaitPoulation Caleity Population
❑
Wean to Finish
❑ La er ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Non -Layer q ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑
Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry E]Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La ers
❑
Fa to Feeder
Elfarrow
to Finish
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Non -La ers
❑
Gilts
❑ Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
ElBeef Brood Cow
❑ Boars
El Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No - NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ YesV
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104 Continued

r
1
Facility Number: 4f—
Date of Inspection ! d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
L[ �l /r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA [INE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes R<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setback's, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)1 f e)r U n
13. Soil type(s)
r7 'y
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
TNo [I NA
[�WKN
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ YesFNo
NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El
NA
El
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
Cv nts {refertoq'uestion�#)��Ezp sin'' any YES answe sn'dd/ty recommendations or any other comments.,
Use drawin s of+�facili�{to /letter$ z"`latn situations. use ad�ditionai a es;as necessar>
Reviewer/InspectorName Phone: ILC�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -� LY Date: lla.
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

01
Facility Number: eo 0 — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes .`��No[01
A ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as re required b the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA '❑ NE
ppq Y
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional ,Comments and/or —Drawings: .n .-¢:_ r _ $_: �� 2 �40'W :I ; rait
I i / , � r ,Tv c l�• �, �%es � D 1i bZ Ce n - f r �9 i D F5F% �
�►���rZ S�r� �7'7(�(dYYj ( � w--? J
C Cp A�e Per e-r i l( 4 l C N4n3C 0 1= igWl "I � �tP e A4�� � S prl�
lei
n Sy 5 12- s
Pi
Page 3 of 3 12128104

--
Type of Visit 2rcompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 01Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 0
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: L� County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ��//
Certified Operator: V_" ✓ L"� I i"'�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Phone:
Title: Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = e =' Q Longitude: = °
Non -haver I I l®ILJ Dairy Calf
Cow
LJ Beef Stocker
Non -Lay ers
Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood C
er
Poults
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Iml
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE J
❑ Yes No"ON %❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection oZ v
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
nStructure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: _pY Se C,
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan'?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ' NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 <NloZl[:] NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
'4f X
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
VN❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
''41A&jif !`'F.1' " .f�.$3 s' AL` k?.#;4AaT .PY Ei 9�4'�
Comments�(refe�r to questn 4) ".Explatin n YE aniwers andlor anyVtcommendatio s r any other comments..
G - 1 a'c' 1 G k•-. �
Use dra►vgt,�ngs of facility to better explain situations. (use,addRion4 pages as ne��c„„eLLssary,).:
.t .'a+x �{'g+a .i � ,1 '� +.. 4 ,. a {�,da+'.-'�' S �5 ', :-t, t r.F i ... i i6WI� ii A �3••e.'
AL
Reviewer/inspector Name �` .1 Phone: ] j
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 2,�/4/0
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: — j Date of Inspection D Pl
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WLJP ❑ Ch kl' t ❑ D . ❑ M ❑ no,
❑ Yes No El NA [I NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
ec �s s es�gn aps er
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes"N[:l
NA -❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ElNE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesFoo
NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
e
Add>tionalG0.mm�entsandlorDrawings.r "ta�'('� .$ ;_f, t� '-
Page 3 of 3 I2128104
Page 3 of 3 I2128104

Type of Visit QrCo lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 D Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
l/ Farm Name: � /Z^ Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: l= ry-
Certified Operator: T'
Sack -up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = 6 = t Longitude: 0 ° = 1 = 1{
Design Current Design Current Design
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity
Current
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10 Laver I
I ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Fee inish
❑ Dairy Heifer
Ej'Pa'rrA to Wean
Dry oultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Layers Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Farr o"Feeder
arrow to Finish❑
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
t t e
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
10 TU rkey Poults
❑ Other
ElBeef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Ficid ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA [I NE
❑ Yes FN
[INA [I NE
❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

II
Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Struc ure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 7No
El NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 7No
❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ��
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
E] ❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
NA ❑ NE
o El NA El NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aAw,�� _�_'� ;. �•�tit: "s$ "R,. a'; �.i • �, ° c,.' �4.3 s.ct,+ar.r' #� ��: .t �:�.' . � . :. .,'�. ,:, u t i r ; �,•=
Comments�(r�eferito question;#)Ezplarnany,tYES answers and/or.anvfrecommendations' or any othercomments
�€ . ;,`��.k. r� ;�3if� oaf _� � .•�. � ME"
ise drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages:as neeessarPyzi«.i
C,>d 4 © En +k Q L, , 4 fly- �J P.y- f?- L�.
(2
`
'"1 1 n re . 4-1 P 4 1-4, +0 F+Gr2�,— 3 0 G,j a_,� E$ Z
I e-
t .. , i,.c ; r
Reviewer/Ins ector Name`I' �t t �� p ' Ys
P �r c s: K � �A..; : , , i4i '
Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: QCj
Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Z f
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ElYes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ t20 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspectio!'No
❑ er Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes
NA ❑ NE
- 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El Yes ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes - ❑ ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104

Facility Number
U
()'Division of Water Quality
b Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
?-0~4'8
Type of Visit Co lance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
I /(G / I
—
Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:
r
'O —
_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
nn Integrator:
Certified Operator: C) - �� r Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
.Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: [= o a 4 = Longitude: [� ° =1
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Daia Heifei
❑
Da Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Z
[IYes N ❑ NA El
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
1128 4 Continued

Facility Number:dZ
Date of Inspection b
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes No NA ElNE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
W. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs []Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
o ElNA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name 7j Phone: —ZL!�1N[E-71 .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 4D
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
EfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections -Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
l.Q N ❑ NA
ElNE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
ElYes
N El NA
El NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit`?
El
El NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
El NA
El NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
El Yes
ZNo ElNA
ElNE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
I 12128104
1

c
Division of Water Quality
FaCllity, Number Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Com nce Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 D Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
f
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
�-
Certified Operator: ''{ 'l ^'"
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Region:
Latitude: 0 c 0 4 Longitude: =° 0 I❑
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to -Wean
❑ F w to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 0 D 6
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ on -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2, is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �NoDNA
N - NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — ' ( Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Struct I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): r�Z&I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No , NA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El o El NA El NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes�No ❑ NA [I NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ff.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 1❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ( .mil 4 4z�-7 .
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
[Z N ❑ NA
No'❑NA
Ld ❑ NA
No ,❑ NA
��o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Poo }
'`1 54 r r-
AC. F(k- f'Y4 f.2 /W S'Q C .
(�jt) r�RZ- 7-200(
pi D0� -7
.��. 4-t>
CC tt
Wo s'100T
r �L
M14r-� JJO-1-1 SPCJric�Ae-` 7D rn94&h toL,r4 0ge_M���.
�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 3 I r 2
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — G Date of Inspection (?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes - No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain InspectionZN
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes
El NA El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ElYesrNoE]
A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
nai Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

Type of Visit 9rcomplia nspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Vis' Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: or- / Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 6,1i^-- *W __ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: rr�� L+ /_/
Q G k r n(j1C..�
Certified Operator: - - - „"^^^ _.,
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = 0 = I Longitude: 0 ° = ' =
Design C►urrent
Swine C►apacity Population
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Design C*urrent
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
I ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Turke s
Other ❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
El Yes:XNo[--] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes PNo
NA El NE
El Yes NA ❑ NE
El Yes NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNoZC
NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Stru�ture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): %4F
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes dNo NA ❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 7N9"
El NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ yes❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
M. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNoNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN ? 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable
/Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) / _M 1%a / 5 M 6l /+¢t -? S . , 4rIY'K
13. Soil type(s) -.7 0Y r—j I Y
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated/in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes dNo NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement`? ❑ Yes R< ❑ NA ❑ NE
t
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes Zo
NA El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El YesNA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El o ❑ NA El
�. y�flar�S ¢A.J� E jaf
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations o�anylother comments � � r1
.Use drawings of facility to better explain situations '(useadditional pages as necessary} ��'e . 49 ,: E �'"
�.NTi�.
Reviewer/inspector Name 1
Phone.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
vl Date:
�L Page 2 of 3 121281041 Continued

FA
Facility Number: Date of Inspection Z /
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑Yes o ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
A,
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit QfCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason far Visit outine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time: I j "l r(JfJI
Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
7A
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: � _L �1 Q-" i
Certified Operator: 7&v- '
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o ❑ 1 = 1{ Longitude: = o ❑ ' ❑
W"Designrrent
��t.
Design �raCurrent �� V I oio�I�'f'� i 4 �Desrg ` C•urrent
acity
ine
apacity Populatiion Wet' Poultry
..
❑ La er
C population " Cattle Capacity Population
apA. . �.�
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Finish
to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑ DairyCalf
er to Finish
i El Dairy Heifer
w to Wean
oultry
❑ D Cow
w to Feeder
kn
❑ La ers❑Beef
❑ Non -Dairy
Stocker
w to Finish
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
s
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys -
❑ Beef Brood Cow
El Turkey Poults
El other
Number of Structures:,
❑ OtherJ
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
C. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes O<N NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

•L
Facility Number: — 3
Date of Inspection L�LICLJ
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: SP �z_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a�GtO 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 �No❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [I Yes;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) & '- P
e
13. Soil type(s) rt p rra f ,�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[Dyes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�No❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Name R ¢ +'�
v� ;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: : . / Date: 0_>
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 1.4 Date of Inspection / d
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the approprrate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
LJ Yes
L'JNo LJ NA
LJ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"
❑ther Code
Rain Inspection�N�oONA
22.
Did the facilityfail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
g g
❑ Yes
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No -❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes;No
E NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No .2<
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA , ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, frceboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
E1'dditional Co uineiits andloc;Drawin.gs
7_410Q y W►y S 0 q C �PI`r/ a4­ j O� c:
S 0 15 3 �1( D5' /I% �%� L G►i�r ,h S t"J CC u �O / d1't - r rr ;. f 'I' a ^.e..
1Z/Z8104

I
lType of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Lagoon Evaluation
ReasonforVisit O Routine Q Complaint Q Fallow up Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
F� ty Number Date of Visits 3 eNotOO=erational
Time:
0 Below Threshold
Permitted C) Certified LL © Conditionally Certified © Registered / Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................
Farm Name: ....Kr..�! :.....�t!hs.... �.2"- .....�.... County: ,rrd r.7.!�T!f:�*'�,?.T........................I.......
f 4r Pli
OwnerName: .......:.................................................................:.............I................... Phone No:............................................................................ _........
5�
MailingAddress:.................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:.........
Onsite Representative:........................ ................ Integrator:........
Certified Operator: ................................................... .. . ......................................................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm: J 0 1.3 z y //"A A &. d� ED
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ° " Longitude • 4 64
❑ Wean to Feeder`
Layer
El ❑ Feeder to Finish`.
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to We
❑Other
❑ F w to Feederr�
arrow to Finish
Ej Gilts
❑ Boars
PE>fi i;SL'4E�9i
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
N
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
It ��
Frecboard (inches): 0
rim
es ❑ No
❑ Yes 8'No r
es ❑Now
es ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
�i
12112103 Continued
9

Facill'ty Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Aroma l 12' 60 Sw• �q
�- Fla# 7nne 3ooyo/,
V+
ReviewerAnspector Name IX
ReviewerAnspector Signature:
Final Notes
ov-t. 4-o ek scAr4 r FP4- � ,i %� f-ou- R. j
DW(o n,,F a A i5vo 6. , 5-�� l-ew� .
A 2A/ # 8 A4 L4 14 - 4< Flvz FPcj7-13 l 40
12112103
Continued
si

.JCS
Facility Number Date of Visit: C)` Time: �
O Nat O erational Q Below Threshold
ermitted 13 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ........... r..,/.l................................................................`',....:....�.�County: ......................
.............................................................. .
Owner Name:
MailingAddress: .....................................................................................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: ..........................................................................
Certified Operator:...../ .. .. .......... Q.! e `.........................................................
Location of Farm: '
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Worse Latitude • ° && Longitude ' d «
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El N
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Struct 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structur 6
Identifier:......................................................................................................................................................
.................................. ......................
Freeboard (inches): y
12112103 Continued

Facility Number:�jj�Date of Inspection OC
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type E ¢ r r t' d � , $n. �+ , , 17&
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes p i
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
f
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
�Ko
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
El Yes
o
❑ Yes 019
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
st71 '.rviW-u.'.:!?Y:�titif-!#" h:ik- 'c Y n.,�Y °:�`C':'"'Y::M.S,Y�'^G.1�rc'z^.=:4.•''�'.�,.:.'�ti:i; rn vYut'i�t�s:'f'Y:.4a°,::...FM,..,..;R �4.:u!"'&E€ 11i,""K 3 -al•
Comments *for
gaestion:#} Ezplasntany�YES?answers aad/ortaay recommendations.or,anygther comments A, 4P � `
'Use drawn` €of faciLaEo�betterex'laulsldlatlons:*useaddltlonal�atasrECC�i [sj,;4J*�';%St sjrn
1' y.,h'x .< P� } �. P 4 - E , p :;B , . F . r3') t ❑Field COPY ❑Final Notes i, .,t .<:;
!
t:..�`< � . E,.� •: � l�`�?8ift{,,1 s? �.e��Ni.�4�J��.�f9 ...�a,�t�fil�i��.�t.�d,..� at5�4L�ts �I��•tu���t� r��,.�Cg�f ,ti�€€g:�.k ���:t:��.& i1.lF'iifnytr.t,'i I.,�� _';St.",ii3�s'c� _.w�aei��i�!!it�t€, :iu+i�t:�!r� tt�r�i�%4i
- T
n I iReVlewib u J;�
I
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: r
12112103 Continued

Foeili,ty Number: — 3 C Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling �n
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Z
1`+
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No �-
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Uo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes k
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[_-]Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
[:]Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

: 1
Type of Visit PrCo�outine
Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Cility Number Date of Visit: i71� r �> Time:
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted © Certified (3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: L---A [O., I I County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Title: Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Tama ' " Longitude ' 6 «
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine . Capacity Population .
P ultry
Capacity Population Cattle Ca aci Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder I
❑ Layer I
Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ on -Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
... ... ..... .........
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Discharees 8� Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste IBC i�,2n & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: r 5
Freeboard (inches): s4 20
05103101
Field Area
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
ElYes L o
❑ Yes ,., N/o
❑ Yes Ld'No
❑ Yes Le!'N0
❑ Yes o
Structure b
Continued

Facility Numbers — j Date of Inspection L O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancc/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Ayyileation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ElPAN ElHydraulic Overload
j
12. Crop type _ L 7 " ci
z.-.S"'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rcouired Records & D c ment
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes � o
❑ Yes 0<0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes JJ'lVo
❑ Yes ,L_,t, Na/
❑ Yes INN
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Ll'iVo
❑ Yes E o '
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
YESanswersandlor'any.:recommendatrons or anyother comments: •a
Comdrawings�of
faciity�to:bettcr�ex'�Explalnany
ose �plain sltuations.,(uk.additionil 'pages as necessary):::..; v
❑ Field Copy 20Pinal Notes
� g .. ,.
Reviewer/InspectorName,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z
05103101 Continued

Facility Number Date of Visit: 1 ,---� N� Time:
^T Nat O erational OBelowThreshold
O Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ��%��V/� _,._ County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swlne ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 ' " Longitude 0 6 0«
`Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
�❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design' , ,;;Current Design Current =b°"
'anacitv Po ulation Poultry Ca aci Population
Cattle
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ;; ❑ Non -Dal
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
No Liquid Waste Ma
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
)esign. Current;-
an aciiv Po) ation
E .
5
❑ Spray Field Area ;
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: f T
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ��o
o
El Yes
ElYes N
❑ Z .,
Yes No
❑ Yes o
ElYes No
Structure 6
05103101 Continued

FacilityNumber: — C
Date of Inspection / m
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes LQ Na
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? El Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level /
elevation markings? ElYes �'
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes io
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding El PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Yes No
12. Crop type '
13. Do the receiving crops differ with hose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ YrCS05X<�Co�'
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ' "
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ElYes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 10
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
IS. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes o
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ElYes o
�] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (.refer tognestion #) Explain,any YES answers'iindlor a y; mmendiihons or any other comments ,
se°dirawings of facility to better explaln iWations (use additronalipages as essary) �.- ❑ Field Copy ❑,Final Notes1 MN
ReviewerlInspector Name ".
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
05103101
tom`. C:
Date:
Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection b
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
ElYes
❑ Yes �No
❑ Ycs VN
El Yes
❑ Yes
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
i
7
O5103101

3`0
IV1810i1 OfS0114nd WatewCbnservahfln� OperaLfln�Review t#�` '
Watew Consewvation �Com hance�Ins tton t%�
i + rv�sion'bfater Walp Cnm Lance Ins ecbon� 4 Qn tYa - P P a r
� _
OtherA e�C �� CratlOfl-;Re'1CVY.
IQ -Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
�,�.I ILI�I�PIII
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ermitted Q Certified Q Conditionally Certified Q Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: .......... �-s.... ... �^^ ....
viY�r�.1............1 ............. "'County:
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: 2q-kk�. .(.�'` C 2 �.�...................................................
....................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .............................. ......... .......... ..... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Op f `'aOperator:.. '`_091c «C el`� -T� .......... Operator Certification Number:
.............. ... ............................................
Location of Farm:
..-"...........................................:......
Latitude �' �" Longitude =0
1 Desig[t Cori ent Desegn Current ' : t i v Design: + "_€Current
Swine lid. Poultry, Cttleaace'P_, . .,.Capactty E >Puliaon, tPt
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Faffow to Feeder
B'Parrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
I,IIEf,,t
- Tofal Design Capae ty,
��t ; I v , � It � •r°I ,°1� g�� 1 ���
Total SSLW'NYE
O,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, If discharge -is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
11
Freeboard (inches): I,� �0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yeses
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes L o
[:]Yes �Vv
❑ Yes
Cl Yes
[I Yes
Structure 6
..............................ZNo
❑ Yes
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
Yes
o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
I, KO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
..Id'
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
12. Crop type
r
13. Do the receiving crops differ with Lse de ignated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
LSO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONO
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
015.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
;;0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑Yes
:�
Required Records & Documents
17.. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & GeneraI Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J"" ' -"
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ��O<
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20-, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design? ❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? /
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 7No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. Does facility requi•a-follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
25. Were an ditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ElYes o
0 •yiolaiioos'oi• 001cper; do *r rb, noted• ft ing tb1s'vpsft; Y:oa Will-teegiye 00 t'u>!- o
.. • coriesnorideRce: about this visit.: •................................... .

Facility Number: - 3 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes;;No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
El Yes
Id 0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
N
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes
❑ No

ivtsion of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
❑ Dtvision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Review
,. OthervA,gency - Operation
10 Routine O Com laint 0 Follow-up of MVQ ins ection Follow-u of DSkVC revic►s, 0 Other
Facility Number gi Date of Inspection
t Tinii of Inspeclion `` 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted 0 Certil"ied ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: erated:
Farm 'an• ��:1^T�'�G'L L- V.County ......................................................................................
Owner Name .................... Phone iN'o:
Facility Contact: ............................ .. .Title:........................................................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: ..................... ..................................................... .../............................ ...........
Onsite Representative: ..Tt......... iy ..r......,P....1/.:Llr�f.!?1!J Intetirator:....................................................................................
..,.
Certified Operator: ................................................... ......................................... . .................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' < C].. Longitude �]"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ [Von -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding PG.ids / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste tManagetnent System
Disch:ar41:� & Sti-cilnl Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed From any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h, lFdischarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? ([I' yes, notify DWQ)
C. IF discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in pihnin?
cf. Dices discharge bypass a lagoon systcm'? ([f ycs, notil'y DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse im acts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm sw ge) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
SlraCIUYU I Structure 2 S[ructcrc 3 SII-ticlure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
SCI-UCtrlrc b
lcicntil�icr: hreehoard (inches): ..........lj..,�7 ...................4L%
..0.............................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
3/23/�)9 seepage. etc.)
�� L%%S �t"7 �L r;✓ I E � I L 1 � S i J—. �✓1��j Continued on back
fl C s4r) -L

IF
Routine O Comulaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection
`Facility Number
13 Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
Farm Name:..... ...G.C%�.F- `�............�... 1.... .........
OwnerName: ................................................... ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ...................................................................,.......... Title:...........
Follow-up ot'DSWC review
Date of Inspection C
Time of Inspection
17 Not Onerational
Other
24 hr. (hh:mm)
Date Last Operated:
County: .............................................................. .......................
PhoneNo:.......................................................................................
Phone No: ..............
MailingAddress: .................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
j
Onsite Representative:.,:.�.�J..lj....... Lln./1.K.Ir .......... .� �r��� ��Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:................. ........................
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude ` I " Longitude • ' 46
Design. Current Design Current . Design Current
Swine , Capacity Population "Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity'''Popu6tton"":
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer JE1 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I I JEJ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Numher of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
M ❑ No Liquid
Manage System � 3
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
r� No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
ElYes
&NO
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in IaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (lfyes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
�No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
L{No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
P(No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,floldina Postds, Flush Pits. -etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):.,1 f........................... .L� ��...... ........... ... ................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11'-1/0-1
❑ Yes /No
Yes ❑ No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes Ld No
❑ Yes OINo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
,(Yes ❑ No
(1f any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13,
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes )2j No
Waste :Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
es No
(If in excess of WHIP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes PNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
_�(G
El
18.
Does the receiving crap need improvement?
Yes Na
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
/Yes ❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ONo
22.
Does record keepin�g�n'd impr ent'?
XYes
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes )?I No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
jo
❑ Yes PfNo
[] No violations or. deficiencies, were noted during this. visit. You.will receive no further
correspbndence about this.visit : , . ; '

61
Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOUR MBA-NDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Numbe�L_ (/ Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name:' u 4L,,,44 t5 , f 1 _ acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Part ll eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit: L c
Date of most recent WUP:
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot. system; 3. linear -move system;
4.-stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2ID3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART ll. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
�F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits fieid(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up mergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
'Number [)ate of Visit: a Time: E==
NNot O erational C Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified /[3 Conditionally Certified. © Registered Date Last Operated or Above
Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .... ..k z A�f. ........r �l 7.fA^...5.... �2t+-. � County:... %.✓. ?!.tl .�..P — .......................
OwnerName:......1 lrL' /� .... � - ... ....... Phone No:.. .... ............................ ... . .... . .......... .................. ........................... ..........
MailingAddress: ................................................................ . ................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:....................... Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative:...... ....iTQ 2 t.........................................0.............. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... .... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude • 4 44
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure; 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ,.: '''"
................. ............................................................................................................................ ......
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0-1 o
es ❑ No
es ❑ No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ZNo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: & -_3 Z/� Date of Inspection! 2 0
IV
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
[:]No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, :notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Bu i1 o -�+ F� 7 /= 5P I !� 6Y7 Su r c,1 v 2 S a V t.3 • 7CV t //
d b�/ l le h, q rvir k-,A o C C e-w 4-0 Gc n e 1oyy i',;t_e
G� c.Ser' G„ ✓� ar + � , �� r I � h a c. � �t �s o F l wt1 � r-'� o i� � trOi- (S ! cJ � �►'
v r- r.,-�t s a-c..�-��,1 d► eYs. `� r-R-a�._ f3 i y
Reviewer/Inspector Name j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12112103
Continued

Facil' yNumber Date of Inspection 7 /L
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Allople-rmitted. 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:'!!;1 rl1.I�..�`-1.�........ .(...1.. ......... County:.�.rCL/! ...............................
OwnerName:....... . '> ........Q Phone ..�...z .................... ................................................................................
............................L
s
Facility Contact: .... J:...11.4. :.... .'1.....................
llTitle: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ... 10.. �... . 0 ......... ......l I: 1. ``t..... Jv�.......... �. . J v...................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative :....../...'!f �'t Integrsrtor:.t:/ri't�...............................................
Certified ......
Operator . ...14' Operator Certification Number:
......... .... ...............�................... ....................
.....................,
Location of Farm:
............................. ................I. ............................ .............................. .....� r
Latitude a �_ �•° Longitude �• �° �«
Design Current. Design Current Design Current
SwPoultry Population Cattlene Capacity Population a y Capacity Po dlation,
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑ her -
r
arrow to Finish po ; , Total Design Capacity
❑ GiltsE
❑ Boars Total SSLW
! Number of Lagoons `E El Subsurface Drains Present agoon Area ❑Spray Field Area ,
Hnldin
Ponds / Soltd'Traps .1❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharttes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ii'yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees dischargc bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identi Fier:
Z II $ 44 `t
Freeboard(inches): ...........LI............... I.. ................................... .................................... ............ I ...................... ................................... ....
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑' 11� wo
ElYes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes Zff
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ZNo
3/23/99
Continued on back

Facility Number: —3 Datr• of Inspection
6. Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type ' QC— WJ, :LA= 9y15�1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
N' • Vwo ttQris pe. dt�f eier bC •were ho ed- il(rrir�g this: visit: - Y:oir 'W i... eeciye Oo: futtht tt' • '
' comes' 6Tidertce: albotit this :visit: ::: .
❑ Yes ❑ o_d
❑ Yes B,
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZNo
Yes
[-]Yes t2�tvo
❑ Yes ;Zo_
❑ Yes J
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes L.. Ko
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ��No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes no�
Yes
El Yes
❑ Yes o
3/23/99

Facility Number: —3 Date of Inspection`—
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑YesLe 1-40
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ;"NPNo
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes o
rtiona omments an...:or IWtn5 ." t�" i�(� ! i l r'1 Tiff i�u': yi
3/23/99

11/3
❑ D' n of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
- Division of Water Quality
10'Routine O Complaint O FoHow-up of DNVQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspect ion 3
Facility Number
Time of Inspection E2= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
g
� Registered /fit Certified [3 Applied for Permit WPermitted0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..1 ..✓...� f.. �. �..-5....../"?I/ / /� County:../'%.!?. Y.. '^....................................
.........................................................
Owner Name* .Cj'!l!...........r�............................................... Phone No:.......... ...f.... .........................
Facility Contact: A..LV. ...:'.......L.......................... Title Phone No:. ..................................................
MailingAddress:........................................................ .........................
Onsite Representative:.A.l..k..:3...... ..1.' 1.......................N..........
Certified Operat.or;.P.p �....... .1 {S 0 l ✓r •r ....................................
Integrator: .........................................
Operator Certification Number; .........................................
Location of Farm: 2 1 3 L
J
.... ..... ... .... .....
Latitude �•.' ��" Longitude
Design Current
"
Design Current; Destgn Current
Swmeiy� Capacity Population
Poultry ,
:Capacity Population Cattle r „Capacety,Popuiatioa,
aY ❑ Wean to Feeder
Io Layer
❑ Dairy
3
❑ Feeder to Finish
I0 Non -Layer
❑Non-Dairyk,
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F to Feeder
❑ Other
m; �"
arrow to Finish p p. J
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
x.
LO�❑ Boars
X T W�
otal SSL
£ ,. ,:. w#
Number o agoo 1 Holding.fonds
❑ Subsurface
Drains Presrea
ent❑
Lagoon A ❑ Spray Field Area
.� � -[' K 'i�.4r ...
...
❑ No
.. ... ....... .
Liquid Waste Management System
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
,�
0<0
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
Of No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑,Yes
E7 No
a
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
(a'
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than. lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
i5 "'
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7/25/97
Continued on back

,.
C do —
Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LaLioons,tioidine Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes to
❑ Yes io
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �,t-..."+­91L- -
.........................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ............./` ..................................................................................... ..............................
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes : 'u
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ;�'o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste_ P—Plication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Cl Yes No
(If in excess of
WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...l1�ir�'....` sit'`..':.J............................................. .......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes t o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes (P xxo
18. Does the,receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ffNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 21 No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes �o
22. Does record keeping need improvement? 'es ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
0 No.violations or deficiencies. were noted- during this: visit.- :You 4ill receive no ftirttier
correspondence about this•.visit:• ..
crest 6n4): Expla
❑ Yes PIKIO
❑ Yes 0
1 0
❑ Yes 0, o
7/25/97

`,.ffDSWC
Animal Feedlot Operation Review
k
❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
fi
y
M
: M
a„v t •S x't`^ -„ram' ,�, a«
�m
Routine O Cam laint 0 follow-u of DW } ins ection 0 Follo%r-u of DSNVC review Q Other
—y Date of Inspection 'L
Facility Number *re _T__-__I
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction ot'hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit tex: L25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
10 Not Operational Date Fast Operated: .
Farm Name:. .l�I�f-F .=5...........r # !
OwnerName: ................................................... .....................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:
..............
County :...............
MailingAddress: ..........................................................
..........................
04ite Representative:,A,.Vj f,,.
Certified Operator: .................................................. .................
Location of Farm:
... Phone No: ...............
.......................................... Phone No:...................................................
integrator: ............................ . I ..............................................
Operator Certification Number ..........................................
C
C
Latitude 0 QC CC Longitude a C LC
Type of Operation Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine : r Capacity Population; : Poultry. Capacity Population .- Cattle.:.' Capacity Population.-.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
r
Number aELagoons/Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IF3 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ID'No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made' ❑Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, slid it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estinlated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes PNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
4/30/97
maintenance/improvement'?
__ --
Y

x
• Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): St cturp I Struucctttre 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
............................... ................ .................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes [I -No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? E Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Anplicatiort
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
rnu .............5.6 ......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
$. -ECP Gb rL—C CaVEr M
V C= 6— i tj t/t, --,? 119 E Cp g
&�K
w 41z--6Ct L-1051"
❑ Yes Y(No
❑ Yes &
.........................................................
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
VNo
�] Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
�] No
❑ Yes UrNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes prNo
sr%nr
7 0 �,Q i rfe_X
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Sign
Date:
re- niuicinn -f Wnl­ 11-1h., W !a. Fnrilitu d eracemavf rinif dlinw

`a}: -y .fs' f; �`Yy�Gsn�`54 .UGH'ti.n.:+pie-w+ .�r�sV.!v„aw �u' rT:!�+t1Ci:��:rWf�K ny eF���l. r' y '77G• r� s :.. �;{aL�:^r+rie'v:e - .--.��.:...,.rP 3..w.+' s�-r•:v}[xr,r- - .f,.-----,.--
T f I (—*� l-2 Q P n nn ri r--
Facility- Number
Farm Status: ® Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
Ell-tertified © Permitted
Elate of Inspection
'rime of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Tirne fin fractiotr of hours
(ex;1.2; t4 �I hr 15 min.)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Opera}tional r Date Last Operated: ............................................................................................ ...................................................
Farm Name: GCf i)� 1.... �Q �..�. County: ,...1� vr.T 1;G L? + o h..
s ......................... .............I.......
Owner Name: ��� t I'hnnc �ffr . l'—.....�...,
.......... .r ................. a.�s........,.,.......�a..-...,.,.....,.,.............. c��� ..,.,. -Z u. 2 .......,.....
Facility Contact: tl ........�r �w+m a.. ................ 1'itle:.,.......................,..... Phone No: „ , /.............-,2/U�
MailingAddress: ....... p... .'.....!. XJ,Y....... ........ 1.!lt,.Q.ke �1......."! ........... ...... IF.Q........................................ ............ ,.............
Onsite Representative:
,,,,,,....,,,,.,....l...Y.r!h........ .. Integrator: ................... ii
Certified Operator:,�r-�f �/ l'1 C P'r'r ............ Operator Certification Number:...,p...,:.f.............
Location of Farm:
................ 7 ............ //. � . ..... F
Latitude 0 �� ©« Longitude
Type of Operation Design Current D+vsign Current Design , : Current
Swine - Capacity :Population' Poultry Capacity Population Cattle ,. Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
I / OM
❑Other ........... .
Subsurface Drains Present 11❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischargge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'!
b. If'discharge is observed, (lid it reach Surface Water? f if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If dischage is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? *r:x
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste nuuiaaement system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintonancehmprovement?
4/30/97
e
❑ Yes a1Vo
❑ Yes UNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes.., ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Q'<
--- .❑ Yes
04�0
❑ Yes
j o r`€
Continued an back

i� +-.,.y'•,.,..�y�r�s� -•- -ti •�-� _.--,. -�--�f� {�4.:.r.:.-c.,'.,,j.���,fr:�..,.'a�+�ti'"...,.y�•��.�;sT`iti'�k:iFN.'�`"'►'�x�n�,,,• - ,� ..---n .��•w.-..�ir:r,:- �....w:+r.,�,�y -�,ar , --�
Facility Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoon~ and/or Holding Ponds)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) 16ss than adequatel)
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
.............................. ., .......................... ........................ I .......
.,
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate. public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 0,Ko
❑ Yes ®'No
❑ Yes Ulslo
z
❑ Yes [O'No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
&1b
❑ Yes
E]-NO
❑ Yes
Q-
❑ Yes
B"No
15. Crop type......................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with -those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Soll"e, �.tpS On
�;,jG 5 Q�CaP(.J U 0r1
Ff �� j 0R
0
ALo1Ca,
S(71j4?r]
��� 1a
h
LJCc�
p.(1Q
/VUr -P,1
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes ©YNo
.......................................
❑ Yes 91'No
❑ Yes 010
i
❑ Yes ©•o
Cl Yes © <O
❑ Yes [9- o
❑ Yes EK
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ©'No
❑ Yes [91V0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water' Quality Section; Facility Asses.
--- Date:
Unit 4/30/97

,.96
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
XFONWA
EDF.=HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1997
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carroll's
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-34
Carroll's Farm 11
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility.
The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that the operation was not discharging
wastewater into waters of the State and that operations were
proceeding according to your approved Animal Waste Management Plan.
As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be in
compliance with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerel ,
J�{dy Garrett,
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101, ��' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N�� An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection T
Time of Inspection ®24 hr. (hh:mm)
Re�st�re Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑D Re d ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
ertified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0
1Not Operational Date Last Operated: .................................. . ....................... . ........................................................................................
Farm Name:..L/rr�.��s �,// 1/
�t ..................._........................................., County:%1.S?�/.�(....kJ(7/............_...q.................
Land Owner Name:n..v(q.rrjlilt/5........................................................................ Phone No:....7.._._'.A.;_.7...-...Zl.0_/................
Facility Conctact:..._K �9 fir w .1 QirL .............. Title:....................................._......... Phone No: 4�...< ...._......._......._........
.....:.... o �_ ..Z y lj' �✓KI v e �t/ ..........._u ..� ...__.... � 3 �S .......................... _........................
Mailing Address:.._ ............................_..... _ .........D
Yru .r
OnsiteRepresentative:..P.. ..._....�t'...................................................................... Integrator:..C1..t..:!'.Y�.................................................
Certified Operator:....._........................................... ...................................... _..................... , Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm: S 1 Z 13 2
Latitude =*='=° Longitude =0=,=µ
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is'observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
C. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
El Yes �NNoo
❑ Yes IQ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 7No
❑ Yes
Continued on back

~ ' Facilfty Number: .
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Ergo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes �Ld'No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes C-I'N0
Structures (Lagoons gndlor I, olding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ YesO
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
.......... .. / ....... �:.:5... / ......................... ............................ ............................
................
.............
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
ElYes
Ingo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Yes
❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
B-No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
es
❑ No
Waste
AUplication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
Ergo -
(If in excess of WMP, orrunoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ...................................................................
16,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
0-114o'
17.
-Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[TNo
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O-Noo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
EM
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
L-J"No
For Certified Encilities ODIX
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
bAc,es. d e af= sS-'/ (P., "'q'y.) (-per . sho NI cf .-e c a.
Reviewer/InspectorName
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,G.r�j �� Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

V11JijL- 0 ( "35 15: 41
15
943 P02 (0 (P
Wagige
N C114.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH $ NATURAL RLSOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONHENTAL MANAGENSNT
Fayetteville Regional -office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form ,
aA) e4 f�q.� m S e /3 Z 77 // • ro A
/C`
,.,.. t�A3�Y�G,ADp�R,�C�::r�-�=-
'
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
gECTION I
Animal Operation Type:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep ���� e-
�ECTIDN II
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste too
system) 7 „fu`(�4/ f ►�,rvu k0 P.wS h �. �u
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined tad or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL
WASTE NANAGEHENT PY..AN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the 5C5 minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
Y
N
Cpways
By says
L
t2m,q /c1 lip'

7 �"JL a? ' 95 15 : 42
943 P03
SsCTiON III
Field Site Management
t_ Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 £t. of a USGS
Map Blue mine Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Dine Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
TIrIGATIp PLAN?
5. is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
6_ noes the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Hest Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately )
S. Is the general condition of this CAF0 facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTToy IV
Comments
m
i
OEM
I a - XI.

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEN WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
PRO P.02/O2
Site Requires Immediate Agt:ntior.
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �7-11- , 1995 7
Time: /0
Farrn Name/Owner: s�"' �Hr• a/cl Gtjrv�//S
Mailing Address: a a
County: Y✓ V rI /
0
Integrator: Phone: _ o y - _-?3 -_Z/o 9
On Site Representative: nr""l B ru ­ Phone:
Physical Addmss/Location: S:rZ 13 ? f
c
Type of Operation: Swine a?oultry Cattle
Design Capacity: O v 0 Scw' S Number of Animals on Site: �(oa-o a
DEINi Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW_ - _
Latitude: " Longitude: Elevation: -_____Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of l Foot +. 25 year 24 hoar storm event
(approximately 1 Foot f 7 inches)�or No Acrual Freeboard: Wit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o, Ng Was any erosion observed? Yes o>�l
Is adequate land available for spray?D or No Is the cover crop adequate? Y� or No
Crop(s) being utilized. h'k , / 6_ S—,,wzr c S
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria"! 200 Feet from Dwellings?(e or No
100 Feet from Wells?J�e_i or No
_}!e arimal waste stockpiled within 1001=eet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes of�q
anmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes 091 ro
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
.,ir^ila.r man-made devices? Yes ore If Yes. Please ExpJaitt.
^.)t �cs me facility maintain adequate waste ukuiagement records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specificre acage with cover crop)�s or No
:additional Comments: t4— - -
Signatwe
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.O'2

1
JP State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p H N R
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 21, 1995
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
P. 0. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
-Swine Operations
Facility Numbers: 11, 27, 29, 30, 36, 37,
and 39.
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
on July 11, 12, and 15, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the
Raleigh Regional Office conducted compliance inspections of the
aforementioned animal facilities. These inspections are part of the
Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with
liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visits determined that wastewater from these
facilities was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
In addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed at these facilities. As a result, these facilities
were found to be in compliance at the time of their inspection.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity.to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspections
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jud�E. ett
o� Water Qual y Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Northampton County Health Department
.Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper -Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

7L3L-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires lmtnediate,Attend P,
_ Facility No.
m � �" � 1 � G✓ A �hMENT
AN�I•N1ADIVISION OF L FEEDLOT OEPERATION.S STI'E VNTAL ISITATION ON RECORD
DATE: 7-/,/ , 1995
Time: //°y
Farm Name/Owner
Mailing Address: ,� �' 3 ° , i 2 `/
County:
Integrator. _ _ Phone- ti • 7I c 9
On Site Representative: ?�.r� ✓� ��f �• ^ _ _ _ Phone:
Physical Mdressf-ocation:
Type of Operation: Swine :'?ouitry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ _ /ac v S r Number of Animals on Site. 10', f p
DEM Cerd ication Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: ' " Elevation: _-__—_Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Aniinal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foat + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (.Y or No Acrual Freeboard: , -L-Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes of:Sq-, Was any erasion observed? Yes o{�tiQ-
Is adequate land available for spray or No is the cover crop adequate? 1,Ygs or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS ruaimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings2;De or No
100 Feet from Wells? ,,%R or No
_�-e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orb
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or'&T
Its animal waste discharges into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or usher
;imilas than -made de0ces? Yes orCo If Y- s. Please Explain.
"J+M5 tric facility waimain adequate waste Mataagerncrrt records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover. crop) or No
Additional Comments: f.-�_s
...
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

r L.
jl�

Report to: WATER QUALITY SECTION
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENRIDWQ LABORATORY (check one): I I CENTRAL I I ARO I I WaRO
Page J— of
For Investigation af:
Sample collector (print name)
and DM -I forms completed by:
�� D Q Sample collector's signature:
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
Lab Use Only
LAB NO,. • *.
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
i i%2 r d/
r
2 (o o�—
-7ZG oy
000
�----
K
Re • wished (signal r •
C
Date
Z� of
Time
3
ec a by (signatu
at
-
ime
-�e
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment circle one):
State Courier ( in -de i red Federal Ex r ss UP5 Other:
Security Type and Conditions:
Scaled by:
Bro en by:
19 r ",, "MORN 'k i '11 '
�r
QAIForms\Sample Receiving%COC form WQ • /1 ' s

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report! Water Quality
F] SAMPLF_TYPE
COUNTY NORTH HAMPTON
PRIORrry
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT 0 QA
STREAM
X EFFLUENT
REPORT TO PRO Regional Office
COMPLIANCE KI CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
EMERGENCY VISIT ID
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : B TOWF,LL
�7
Estimated ROD Range: Station Location: MURPHY BROWN FARM MI
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Slatim # Date Begin (yy/mmfdd) Dale End (yyhnmldd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB. DBM Vslue Type - A, H. L Composite-T. S, Sample Type
MURPHYBROWNDIVERSION 20040726 1045
X
BOD 310 65 inglL
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 -EJL
Coliform: MF Fetal 31616 /loom[
Coliform: MFToial 31504 /loom]
Coliform tube Fecal 31615 1100-1
Coliform: f-acal Strep 31673 /IOOml
Residue: Total 5W m
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed MO m
ResKbue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatik 535 mrJL
Fixed 540 MWL
H 403 units
Acidity to PH4,5436 MvL
Acidity to pH8.3435 mg/L
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 415 m
Alkalinity to pH4-5410 mg/I,
TOC 680 m
Turbidity 76 NfU
CoHf.ormTotaI Tube '/100 ml
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m
Chi a: Tri 32217 u
Chi a: Corr 32209 u91L
Pbcophyvin a 37213 u
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color. (EH ) 83 Pjj= C.U.
Color. pli 7.6 82 C.d.
Cyanide 720 m
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 MELI-
Crc and Oils556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 m
Specific Cond. 95 umhoskm2
MBAS 38260 m
Phenols 32730 u
Sulfate 945 mg(L
Sulfide 745 mgfL
Baron
Tannin & [a mn u
Hexavalcm Chromium ug/L
Bicarbonate m
Carbonate mwL
X
NH3 as N 610
40
m
X
TKN an N 625
48
M911,
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.02U
mrJL
X
P: Total as P 665
16
mg/L
PO4 as P 70507
m
R Dissolved as P 666
mg/L
K-Potassium
_FJL
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u
Cr-Chromium:Tolal 1034
u
Cu-C r t042
ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1057
u
Ptr Lcad 1051
ug/L
Zn-Zinc 1092
UVIL
IV -Vanadium
ugAL
Ag-Silver 1077
ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105
u
Be- Be ilium 1012
ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916
m
Co Cobalt 1037
ugfL.
Fc- Iron t045
v
Li -Lithium 1132 ug(L
Mg- Mapesium 927 mg)L
Mn-Man nest 1055 uFJL
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L
Arsenic.Toial 1002 uEYL
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/L
H - Marvry 71900 UVI-
Ba-Barium ug/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
OTamphosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Bas&Neutml&Acid Extractable OTpnics
TPH Diesel Range
Pwgeable anh:s (VOA bottle 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPHBTEX Gasoline Range
Phytoplankton
1 P
lr
d
(O
N
fir:,:
i�
l

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER tMAMPLETYPE
B FORM (DMI)
Cotkm .441%PRIORITY
R1VF31 BASIN — [:]AMBIENT ❑ QA ❑ STREAM "EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO R WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
AT BM ❑COMPLIANCE CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLIJENT
Other
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier, ff Other ❑EMERGENCY ESTUARY
COLL£CTORISr ta, Q
Estimated BOD Range: 0- -25/25 /40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Fnr Ir h Iles AN1 v
Lab Number:
Date Recelved: Q Time:
Rec'd by! From: Bus-Courie Hand eJ%
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
'Pe' Utz- f-y' 0, 4, —f (4
Seed: Yes N Chlorinated: Yes No REMARKS:�r 6 F Lea .sTe c Al �y�, 2(ao .l al f t�zo as . _,'9 at.-C t_
5tatlon # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample T
I►'�I:Lr����Lc-ri 0cye'r5' A H G T S B Cf, G 1GNXX
1
DODS 310 mgA
2
COD High 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 5 mg/I
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100m1
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 5W mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 9.3 415 mgA
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 690 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 Itg/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ugA
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color. pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71890 mg/1
Grease and Otis 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhoa/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ugA
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TK. ns N 625 mg/1
02 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/l
otal as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 m9A
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/I
CrChromlum:Tetai 1034 ogA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NMickei 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 USA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
A liver 1077 ng/1
A1-AIuminum 1105 ugA
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/i
Ca -Calcium 916 -911
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe -iron 1045 ugA
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
Arsenlc:Total 1D02 ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Olganophosphorvs Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance -at 25 CNateIrTemperaturejO
D.O. mgA
pH
AIkaIinity
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature fo
2
94
10 1
300 •
400 to
822" 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover X
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width It.
480
46
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
14
CJf r LJ

NC DENR/DWO Chemistry Lahnratnry
Report to: Sample Anomaly Report (SAR
Lab Number: /��_ Sample ID: �Vo
`'tion Location: �[J/l� un Regio
sample Type: Priority: S.�Q�� Collector-
Date collected: c I Ig95G DatSeceived: 7l_�7 I,BSG_ Datte ilalyzed: r� /g72 /d9
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ ETALS
El NUT MICRO
7S,
llowing anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
mples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH Out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable res Its
c �
Other (speci
'a
Comments:
Corrective Action:
❑ VOA
❑ PEST
❑ SVOA
❑ Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑ Analyst error — no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
Cl None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ Internal standards
❑ Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
Insufficient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date: / 1
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
❑ Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes No
Person Contacted:
Form
1 Chemist Re w n'tial): - I
Bloc H =* ❑ PEST
METALS / ❑ VOA
Branch Head Review (i ' a tVnV(
QA/QC Review { nitial):
QA%Fa nmAL&bo nlorylS AA
Date: / 1
Date: '? I�I��
❑ SVOA
!7� Logged into database by (initial):
IW2310ldbr
Oil

-1%
t-„
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality lab Number : 4W4586
W�. SAMPLE TYPE Date Received: 7/27I2004
COUNTY NORTH HAMPTON MRTOBIIY Time Received: 9:30AM
RIVER BASIN: AMBIENT QA STREAM KI EFFLUENT Received By OS
REPORT TO - RRO Regional Office COMPLIANCE 0 CHAIN OF CUSTOUY LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other EMERGENCY VISIT ID ESTUARY Data Released o AR"'I!
COLLECTOR(S) : B TOWEL1 Date Reported : W012004
Estin noted BOD Range: Station Location: MURPHY BROWN FARM # 1 I
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station If Date Begin (yyh.Wdd) Dale End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin I Time End I Depth • DM, DR, DBM Value Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S, Sample Type
MBPARM011 20M726 1100
R
BOD 310 320 mg/L.
COD High 340 m
COD Lnw 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /t00mf
Coliform: MF Total 31-%9 /I00m1
ColifMm: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Colifonrc Fecal Strrp 31673 1100mr
Residue: Taal 500 m
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 m
Residue: Suspended 530 m
Volatile 535 m
Fixed 540 m
H 403 units
Acidify to PH 4.5 436 nig/L
Acidity to PH 83 435 mSfL
AlkaliniQ to PH 8.3 415 MZIL
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m
TOC 690 mWL
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "1100 ml
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a' Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 uVL
Color. True 80 c.u.
Coior-f H) 83 pH= CA.
Color. PH 7.6 82 Cu.
Cyanide 720 mg/L.
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formatdch de 71880 m
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 M&4-
Specific Cond-95 umhWcm2
MBAS 38260 mrJL
Phenols 32730 ugtL
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg1L.
Boon
Tannin & Li in ug/L
Hexavalew Chromium ugJ]-
Bicarbanate m
Carbonate m
X
INK3.N610
130
mg/L
X
TKN an N 623
150
mg1L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.02U
mg/L
X
P: Total as P 665
50
mg/L
P'04 as P 70507
mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m
K-Potassium
m
Cd- Cadmium 1027
ug/L,
Cr-Chmmium:Totai 1034
u
Cu- copper 1042
u
Ni-Nickel 1067
ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051
u
Zar- Zinc 1092
ug/L
V-Vanadium
u
A - Silver 1077
uSIL
AI -Aluminum 1105
ug/L
Be -Beryllium 1012
ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916
In
Co- Cobalt 1037
u
Fe- ]run rO45
ug/L.
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/L
M - Magnesium 927 m
Mr -Manganese 1055 uglL
Na- Sodium 929 mfJL
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/L
Se -Selenium 1147 u
H - Mercury 71900 upll-
Ba-Harium ug/L
Or anochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
BasdNeulml&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable anics(VOA bottle read)
GasolineRan e
H/BTEX Gasoline Range
Il
ytoplankinn
!r
t
I

For Lab Use ONLY
DIVISION %Jr r_�NVIRONMENTAL MANAGEM£N7
WAT U Q-LAB FORM MMI)
CC�IJmy V 14A1."
f
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN e
❑AMBIENT
❑STREAM
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RO aRO WiRO WSRO TS
PCHAIN�
EFFLUENT
AT BM
❑COMPLIANCE
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
OF CUSTODY
❑ESTUARY
Shipped by; Bus Courler to , Other
EMERGENCY
Lab Number:
II��
Date RecelvedP V: Time:
Rec'd b ; From: Bus-Couri -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTORIS): 04) --e/ ( � -P l�'r3 r✓�1V �4� //
Estimated SOD Range: 0-5/ -25/ 40-190 or 100 plea STATION LOCATION(_ (.LI' 'iC
Seed: Yes 11 No Chlorinated: Yes No Er —REMARKS: _�tt i 5 ~� -Q_ � H [ 2 &P-41le-e- 47 _ 3,q I-n
Station # �-'one -Q2 Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample Type
0-( . 0 ( i ?� (too QYfQ� f�� _[� F7jJ &ejO�__ I
A H L T S 8 C (:D GNXX
1 I 2fT
OD5 310 mgA
2 COD High 340 mgA
3
COD Low 25 mg/1
4
Colliorm: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Colliorm: MF Total 31504 /loom[
6
Colliorm: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Colliorm: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
1Residue:
Total 500 mg/I
9
volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
1 I
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/l
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 m9A
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mgA
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/l
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7-6 82 ADM[
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/t
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/l
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/1
IqH3 m2A
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mg/I
P. Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromium:Total1034 u9/1
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
Zn-Zinc 1092 u9A
lArSilver 1077 USA
APAIuminum 1105 u11/1
Be-Berylltum 1012 149/1
CaCalclum 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe -iron 1045 ugA
Ll-Llthlum 1132 ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mgA
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
Arsenie Total 1002 ug/l
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
1Organochlorine Pesticides ,
1 Organophc+aphonts Pesticides T�
I 1 Acid Herbicides I
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics IVOA bottle reg'd)
I Phytoplankton I
Sampling Point x
Conductance at 25 C
Meter Temperature 16
D.D. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature IC)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400 1•
82M 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity X
Precipition (In/day)
Cloud Cover X
Wind Direction (peg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Wean Stream Depth ft
Stream Width it
490
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

to:
NC D1r.NR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: Wyl/ r Sample TD:A le e__
ation Location'
FA unty: Region:
sample Type: Priority: [L Collecttoor: l
Date collected: 2_lg?ji l ^P Date received: �Ic7ZI95G Daalyzed:
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ /4ETALS
❑ NUT Q-40 MICRO
•The ff flowing anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
Ga' Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab
-nno reportable results
celo (sP(:c
Comments:
Corrective Action:
❑ VOA
Cl PEST
❑ SVOA
❑ Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure - no reportable results
❑ Analyst error - no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
Cl Internal standards
❑ Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e, QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
Insufficient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date: 1 I
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
❑ Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes Nye J
Person Contacted: / / , / Date
I Chemist R ie initial):
bBIOCHE ❑ ❑ SVGA
METALS ❑ OA
Branch Head Review itial):
QA/QC Review ( dial): Logged into database by (initial)
QA7om %LrburaWrylSAR 1043/O1dbi

-7)j
z 4;2
J/":;r

M
m
Postage $
a-
M Certified Fee
� Postmark
Return Receipt Fea Hero
r. (Endorsement Required)
Iru Restricted Deifvery Fee
O {Endorsement Required)
G
E—
C3
ATN: MR. WILLLMM KLEIN
,..,,...T.•r,.,r.nr�v�innncvn�rrCUAl7Y

Report to: t] WATER QUALITY SE 3N ; r l page --L ol'—L
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (CO JRE�CORD �s
NC UENR/OWQ LABORATORY (check one): (I CENTRAL I 1 ARO I I WaRO ��'� - -•``�f11
For Investigation of:
Sample collector (print name) trs 7-0 tv R I
and DM-1 forms completed by:
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
Sample collector'sisignature:
a y
1 1L 1� 1
Lab Use Only
LAB NO.
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
u^
"=
!SAMPLED
TINI F.
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
S �Z 13 Z
Gu .17
n i� p • �.,-
�n, c�
3 $/ `l
/v 3 v
7
1 02
3
`�
0-dds' DS Jt=
5' lr 5 7�
3 23 Oaf
lG�/s
s"7 rzei ,- ��
5:e
u
j
5, Q 01-1
J
Reli uished by si natu
D to
Time
ec" y ( igna re}
ge/
Time
R linquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment circle one):
State Courier Hand -delivered Federal Ex ress UPS Other:
Security Type and Conditions:
Sealed by:
Broken by:
IN TRA LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
LAB NUMBERS
FROM THROUGH
NUMBER
BOTTLES
ANALYSES
REQUESTED
RELINQUISHED
BY:
RECEIVED
BY:
DATE
TIME
7
U
3-q 'd/+
q5' 371
4, 4t/�-
5
�r
QA\Fonnsl.SamPle Receiving\COC form WQ 4110101 dbs

L"r
COUNTY NORTH HAMPTON
RIVER BASFN :
REPORTTO : RRO Regional Orrice
Olhrr
COLLECTOR(S) : B TOWELL
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
C'hemidry 1-thoratory Report 1 Water Quality
PRIORITY
AMBIE T El QA
El COMPLIANCE El CHAIN OF CUSTODY
l EMERGUNCY VISff ID
0
I-� r ) 1 —
El
� r
1:
1 �
STREAM n ir•-r}T•LU
�C '
--�� , f �
LAKE LNFL J
�l
❑ FSTUARY
l
Lah Numhcr -
4W I274
Da1c Rcs:civcd:
- 2004
Time Received:
8:30 AM
Received By
- DS
[n!
Utica Released :
AR
Date Reported:
311g2004
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: SR 1328 BRIDGE. UPSTRFAM
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station A Date Begin (yylmmldd) Date End (yylm-Vdd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A, It, L Compadle-T. S, Sample Type
SR 1328DUPSIDE 200i0..W am
%
BOD 310 29 mffl-
COO High 340 m
COD Low 335 mrJL
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom)
COifpm: MFTolal 31519 110011,11
Coliform: luhe Fecal 31615 1100ml
Coliform: Fecal Simp 31673 flooml
Residue: Tnt21 SW MPJL
Volatile SOS nTiL
Heed 510 m -
Residue: Sua riled 530 MVL
Volatile 535 mfJL
Ftscd UO mrJL
H 403 units
Acidity to pli4.S436 mgfL
Acidity to PH83435 mg/l.
Alkalinity in pil 8.3415 mrJL
Alkalinity in pH4.5410 m
TOC 680 moll.
ITurbidily 76 WU
Coliform Taal Tube '1100 mis
COMNIFNIS :
Chlnnde WO mgfL
Chia: Tn 32217 u
Chi a: Core 12.'09 ugA.
PhetOyfin a 32213 ug1L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (fi) 83 PH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg11.
Flumide 951 mgfL
Formatdeh de 71 B80 MVL
Grease and Oils 556 mg1L
Hardness Tufa19011 mgA.
Specific Cond. 95 umhosfem2
MBAS 39260 m9fL
Phermis 327.40 uglL
Sulfate 945 mFJL
Sulfide 745 mgn-
Bmmn
Tannin & US in ugfL
Hesavalem Chromium ug/L
Bicartxxiate mgfL
Caritmriate MEJL
N
NIO as N 610
16
mg/L
X
TKN an N 625
18
mgll_
N
1,102 plus NO3 as N 630
1.4
mgfl.
X
P: Taal as P 665
1.1
mgfL
PO4 as P 70507
mg1L
P: Dissnlwd as P 666
m
K-Potassium
mgfL
Cd. Cadmium 1027
ugA,
Cr-Chmmivm:Tmla1 t034
ugfL
Cu- Copper 1042
uVL
Ni-Nickel 1067
UA
Pb- Lead [051
ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092
ug/L.
V -Vanadium
UA
A - Silver 1077
uglL
Al- Aluminum [ 105
ug/L
Be- Beryllium IM2
UgtL
Ca- Calcium 916
mgiL
Co- Cobalt 1037
ugfL
Fe- Iron 1045
uYL
U-Uthium 1132 ugfL
Mg- Ma ncsium 927 mgA.
A!n-Man ancsc ]0.55 ug1L
N.- Sodium 929 mg(L
Arscriic:Tntal 1002 ugfL
Se- Selenium 1147 ug/L.
H - Mercury 71900 u
Ba_Banum u
Or annchlmioe Pesticides
ann hms horus Peslicides
Acid Hcdiicidcs
BaeelNcuiraL& Acid Estivelahie Organic
TP14 Diesel Range
Pur cahlc O anics (VOA honle rcq'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPWBTCX Gasoline Rage
phyioplonlWil

DIVISION
�IOFENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER
COUNTY't/'I/ �" 1 , wl✓T 4�yPRIORITY
RjJM BASIN C �� /L_/ _ _ _
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MR RR WaRO WIRO WSRO TS AMBIENT
AT BN ❑ COMPLIANCE
Other
Shipped by: Bus Couurle , S� tall, Other EMERGENCY
COLLECTOR(•S):
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5- /25-65/40-130 r 100 plus STATION LOCATI
Seed: Yea ElN Chlorinated: Yes ElN�REMARKS: C
LJ STREAM
CHAIN ❑ LAKE
OF CUSTODY
❑ ESTUARY
413z�� Bf�c>1
4
1:ur Lab Use ONL.1
FORM (DM1)
Lab Number: Uujt
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd by: From: Bu and Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
EFFLUENT
INFLUENT
r� �7
. -;yam r17
Station #
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End Depth DM DB DBM
Value Type
Composite
Sample Type
5 2 i 3 z
j�
, J IL
0L i7� (>
[�
C1
,3
A H L
T S B
C G GNXX
1
RODS 310
mgA
COD High 340
mgA
2
3
COD Low 335
mg/i
Conform: MF Fecal 31616
/100ml
4
5
Collform: MF Total 31504
/100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615
/104m1
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673
/100ml
7
S
Residue: Total 500
mg/1
_
Volatile 505
mg/f
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8-3 435 mg/l
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mgA
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 660 m9A
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/i
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/l
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ng/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(PK ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/i
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/l
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
N as N 625 mgA
02 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/i
Total as P 665 mg/I
F04 as P 70507 mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmium 1027 u9/1
CrChromiuucTotal10M ug/1
Cu-Gopper 1042 u9/1
Ni-Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag-Silver 1077 USA
Al -Aluminum 1105 ag/l
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/l
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co-Cob'It 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Li -Lithium 1I32 ug/1
Mg-Magneslum 927 mgA
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/1
Arsenic:Total 1002 u9/1
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Orgasophospiarus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phymplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature 10
D.O. mgA
PH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 9.3
2
94
10
300 •
40D t.
82244 1431
82243 102242
20
Salinity x
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MM
Vlean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width fL
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
f,'hemictry [Alsoratory Report! Water Quality
^`l ..7 !/nf
Lah Number :
4W1275
ElOV
•ate
Recciyetl :
31912t101
COUNTY
NORTH HAMPTON
PRtOkITY
' `r
T"ncRecciveJ:
S:30AM
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT
QA
STREAM
/f X g g r -y
Received By
DS
REPORT TO
RRO RegionalOffiice
COMPLIANCE
%� CHAINOFCUSTODY
LAKE
IN17-UENT i�
�g 1�
Other
_
%� FMrRGENCY
VISIT ID
ESTUARY
�` !f
Data Released :
AR
COLLECTOR(S) :
B TOWELL
_
Dace Reported:
3118/2004
Estimated DOD Range:
Station L ration: DS OF SPILL IN BEAVER POND
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station #
Date Begin (yy/mm/ddi
(late Find (yyhnm/dd)
Time Begin
Time End
Depth • DM. DR, DRM
Value Type - A. It, L
Composile•T, S.
Sample Type
DSBEA V ERPOND
2CM0308
1030
X
13OD 310 27 m
COD High 340 mrJL
COD L.ow 335 MO.
Cohforrn: MF Fecal 31616 / I IX3ml
Colifurm' MF Taal 31504 /l0[1mI
Coliform: mile Fecal 31615 /100mi
Coliform: Fecal Sure 31673 /1(X)Ml
Residue: Tntal SOO m
Volatile 505 MVIL
Fixed 510 m
Ruidue: Suspended 530 mgfL
Volatile 535 m
Fixed 540 mriL
H 403 units
Acwtuy to PH C5 436 m
Aridity to PH 8.3 435 mrJL
Alkalinity to PH8.3415 m
Alkalinity to pH4.5410 m
TOC 680 m
Ttubuhiy 76 NTU
Cohrorm Taut Tubc '/100 m1.
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m
Chi a: Tri 32217 UFJL
Chi a: Curt 322109 uefL
Phcophylin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 c u-
Color. (pH) 83 PH= C.U.
Color. PH 7.6 82 c_u.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fiur ride 951 mg(L
Formaldch de 71880 mg)L
Grcasc and ()its 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
WAS 38260 mg/L
Phenals 32730 UELL
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Rmun
Tannin d Li in v
Hexayaknt Chmmium ug/L
Bicarbonate '911-
Carbonate mg1L
X
NH3 as N 610
19
m
X
TKN an N 625
21
m
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.88
MCAL
X
P: Total as F 665
1.4
mvT-
PO4 as P 70507
m
P: DissnNed as P 666
MSIL
K-Pmassium
MVL
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u
Cr-Chmmium.Tnta1 1034
u
Cu- Copper 1042
u
Ni-Nickcl 1067
u
Pb- Lead 1051
uEj
Zn- Zinc 1092
UPIL
V-Vanadium
u
Ag- Silver 1077
u
AI- Aluminum 1105
u
Be- Beryllium I012
ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916
m
Ca -Cobalt 1037
uFJL
Fe- Imn iO45
ugft-
HF—�
Li -lithium 1132 uEj
Mg. Ma ncsium 927 mEJL
Mn-Man anew 1055 ug/L
N.- Sndium 929 m
Arxenic:Totat IOO2 u
,c-Selenium 1147 uglL
Hit- Mercury 71900 ug/L
Ra_Banum ug/L
Or anochtrsinc Nmicidcs
Orfanvphosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
BasdNcu1MlAAcid UiractaNe (k anics
TPH Diem[ Range
Pu cable Organics IVOA bottle 'd)
TPH Gawlim Range
TPWBTEX Gasoline R.npe
Phytopt.nitton

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WAT QUAL - EL FORM (DM1)
COUNTY Iy0�� I �1'1 �"��%T FJ PRIORITY PE
RiVER'SASIN UCU' ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA rE_FfFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MR RR WaRO WIRO WSRO TS ❑STREAM LJ
AT BM ❑COMPLIANCE CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other �'OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier CStal l ; Other EMERGENCY ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S): �� �O C,/ � � {
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5- 5-65/40-13 100 plus STATION LOCATIO/N: S h` /fI ✓p�'�e
Seed: Yes ❑ N Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No -REMARKS: / L.. Pf Q Cv t�>�
Station }� Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM
(2s !3 .� v r�a��i 10Y 0 3 o t5 0 Y 0 023 1t) 3 o
1
OD5 310
mg/i
COD High 340
mg/I
2
3
COD Low 33S
mg/I
Collform: MF Fecal 31616
/IOOmI
4
5
CofHorm: MF Total 31504
/100m1
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615
/100m1
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673
/100m1
8
Residue: Total 500
mg/I
Volatile 505
mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 690 msA
-A
Turbidity 76 1'Iili
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
CoIor:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/i
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/em2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/I
For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number:
Date Received: Time-
Rec'd b ; From: Bu and Del
Y
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
A H L
NH3 as N 610 msA
TKN as N 625 mg/1
02 plus NO3 as N 630 nrgA
otal as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmium 1027 u9A
Cr-Chromlum:Tota11034 u9A
CuCopper 1042 ug/1
Ni-Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag-Silver 1077 u9A
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be•Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 u9A
Fe -Iron 1045 uqA
Composite Sample
T S B C �C G GNXX
LI-Lithium 1132 ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/l
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
Arsenic -Total 1002 USA
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlortne Pesticides
Otganophosphoru_s Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytopiankton
Sampling PointX
Conductance at 25 C
oter Temperature
D.O. m9/1
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature $a
pH8.3 PH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300
400 •
82244 431
82243 82242
20
x
Precipition On/day)
Ckd Coves X
Cloud
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
490
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
r0A1 /rt-4...1 tn/RF

• 2
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laborulory Report I Water Quality
0
COUNTY NORTH HAMPTON PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN: AMBIENT QA STREAM
RF,PORTTO RRO Regional Office El
COMPLIANCE CHAINOFCUSTODY 13 LAKE
Other EMERGENCY VISITID ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : B TOW+ELL
Lab Numhcr : 4 W 1276
bate Received: 319/2(X)4
Time Received: 8:30 AM
Received Hy p5l
Data R leased AR
Date Reported: 3/1712004
F{fimafed ROD Pynw: Station i.ora[ion: WOODS US OF SPILL ENTRY SITE
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station # Daft Begin (yylmmldd) Dale £nd (yplmrnldd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DR, DRM Value, Type- A, H, L Composite-T, S, Sampfe Type
INWOODSDSOFSPILL 20040308 1045
x
HOD 310 120 m
COD High 340 mEi
COD law 331 MfJL
Cohfrxm' MF Fecal 31616 / IOOmI
Coliform: MFTda131504 /loom[
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 HOQmI
Coliform: Focal 5(mp 31673 1100tn1
Residue: Total 500 m
Volatile SO meJL
Fixed 510 m
Rosiduc: Suspended 5-10 m
Volatile 535 m
Fixed 540 m
H 403 units
Acidly to IIH 4.5 436 MFJL
Acidit to H 8.3 435 mELL
Alkalinity to pli 8.3 415 m
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mfJL
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Colifrxm Total Tube '1100 mis
COMMENTS t
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 u
Chi a: Corr 32209 u
Pheophnn a 32213 uglL
Color: True 80 C_u_
Color: (li ) 83 PH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 95I mfJL
Formaldeh 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils % m
Hardness Total 9W mglL
Specifrc Coed. 95 umhosfcm2
MBAS 38260 mg1L
Phenols 32730 ug1L
Sulfate 945 mWL
Sulfide 745 __mpfL
Baron
Tannin 3 Li nin u
flexavalent Chromiom ug/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
CarMnate mg/L
d
J /
r:
u
r � EFFLUENT
r
-
C D
•, INFLUENT
T
X
r--
z
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mVL
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgll..
K-Potassium mgfL
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chmmium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu-Copper 1042 uglL
Ni-Nickel 1067 ugll.
Pb- Load 1051 uelL
7,ri- Tnc I092 ug/L
V-Vanadium uWL
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
AI- Aluminum 1105 ug/l,
Be- Beryllium 1012 uSfL
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L.
.-Cobalt 1037 ugfL.
Fe- iron 1045 ug/L
Li -Lithium 1132 ugIL
M - Magnesium 927 nigIL
Mn-Man arose 1055 u
Na- Sodium 929 myJL
Arsenic:TMA 1002 uvL
Sc- Selenium 1 147
H - Mercury 71900 uFIL
Ba_Hanum uFJL
Orgattochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Hcrtricidcs
BasdJNeutraMAcid Extractable organic&
TPH Diesel Range
Pur eabic Organits {VOA "Ile 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phyloplankltm

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATE UALIT EL
COUNTY- 1! / / �/7 /t PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN Ic — L✓gi
REPORT TO: ARO FRO Mn RR WaRO WIRO WSRQ TS ❑AMBIENT QA
AT BM ❑COMPLIANCE CHAIN
Other �� OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier f, Other d 1 emERGENCY
COLLECTOR(•S). lr"-L l
FORM (DM1)
SAMPLE T /
STREAM L J AFFLUENT
❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
❑ ESTUARY
Estimated BOD Range: O-S/S_25 65/40-13 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: W f� v�! 1! D os i� S
Seed: Yea El NChlorinated: Yes ElNo E2 -'£MARKS: Iy L i / 0 CJi7,
For Lab Use ON? V
Lab Number:
Date Received: C Tim
i.
Rec'd by: From: B -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
l / Q h 4, y S, .1 E '11' 13 / Iq r n , /tp` / /
Station Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM Type
Composite Sample
�r1 WCt_ldy bs OI= S ,/I U` �3 Lf
t �!
I Ci �3 0
QL
Salue
�— A H L
T S 8 G GN?CX
1
DODS 310
mg/l
COD High 340
mg/I
2
3
COD Loa 335
mg/1
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616
/100m1
4
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504
/loom]
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
/100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673
/100ml
8
Residue: Total 500
mg/l
Volatile 505
mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4-5 436 mg/1
i6
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/l
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/i
19
t20i8
TOC 680 mgA
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Trk 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(PH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/l
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/i
Sulfate 945 mg/l
Sulfide 745 mg/l
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9A
P. Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as p 70507 mgA
P Dissolved as P 666 mgA
Cd- Cadmium I027 ugA
Cr-Chromium:TotalI034 USA
Cu-Copper I042 ug/i
Ni-Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zrr-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag-Silver I077 ugA
Al -Aluminum 1I05 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 m9/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/1
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mg/l
PH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 00
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1
400 t•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity S
Precipition (in/day)
Cloud Cover A
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Mean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY r
l,Tremistry lAboralory Report! Water Quafity ----� _ i.�,r'-� l.abNumhcr 4WE278
- i! Date Received: 3/9/2004
COUNTY - NORTH HAMPTON PkIORITY {'� J Time Reetiyed : 8:30 AM
RIVER BASIN: AMBIENT ❑ QA El STREAM X�EFFLUENT _ 7 RmcivcdByqD
ll
Q
��REPORT TO RRO Regi—alO(fice COMPLIANCE 19 CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE INFLUENT !-_--.1p
Other EMERGCNCY VISIT In ESTUARY ___,i Data kaxd
COLI,ECTOR(S) B TOWELL lam,
rL f, --�✓I Date Reported : 3117/2004
R'l'f
Estimated BOD Range: Station I-ocalion: SPILL SfTE MB HOG FARM pl I
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Statlon a Date Begin (yy/mmldd) Dale End (yy/mtWdd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - Dh7, DB, DB%I Value Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S, 1 Sample Type
SPrf.L.SCCE 2OD401OR 1130
X
BOD 310 2300 mrjL
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mgfL
Codif� MF Fecal 31616 /I00m1
Coliform: MF Taal 31-W 1100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 1l0(lmr
Coliform: Fecal Sirep 31673 /IOOmr
Residue: Taal 500 m
Volatile 505 mVL
Fzcd 510 rjL
Residtr neled 531) m
Volatile 535 mFIL
Fi sed 540 m
fl 403 units
Acidity In pH 4.5 436 mvL
Acidity to pit 9.3 435 m
Alkalinity to H 8-3 4I5 -rA-
Alkalinity to pFf4.3410 m
TOC 680 mvL
Turbidity 76 NTU
Cobform Total Tube -/100 ml.
COAIAILXTS
Chlondc 940 m
Chl'a: Tri 32217 uglL
Chl a: Corr 32209
Pt"y;in a 32213 u
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color. (PH ) 83 II= C.U.
Colm: PH 7.6 82 c.u.
Cyanide 720 mgJL
Fkk idc 951 MCA -
Formaldehyde 71890 mFA-
Grease and Oils 5..% mg/L
Hardness Tnwl9tM1 m
Spccific CFud. 95 umhus/cm2
MRAS 38260 m -
Phenola 32730 u
Sulfate 945 mgA,
Sulfide 745 mrfL
Boron
Tannin & LU nin u
Hcsayaknt Chromium u9fL
Bicarbonate inglL
Carbonate -FJL
NH3 as N 610 mgA_
TKN an N 625 m
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Tmal as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mglL
P_ Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium me,/L.
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chmmium:Tmal ]034 ug/L
Cu- Coppc, 1012 ug/L
Ni-Nicket 1067 u
Pi} Lead 1051 ug/L
7— Zinc 1092 ugA-
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1905 utJL
Bc- Beryllium d012 ug/L.
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ugA.
Fc- iron 1045 ur/L
Li -Lithium 1132 u
M - Magnesium 927 mrJL
Mn-Mangarcse 1055 upA,
Na- Sodium 929 mrJL
Atsenic:Total 1002 uFJL
Sc- Selenium 1147 ug/L
H - Mercury 71900 ugIL
Ba_Barium
Organoehlotine Pesocides
Organ . phsxus Prmicides
Acid Herbicides
BawfNeut-I&Acld Estmctahlc Orgamcs
MI Diesel Range
PuFycabir OrIzzamcs(VOAhmtk 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Ph o lanktno

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1) _
/!/ o r� /J '^�J-4
COUrd^IT
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN &-/�}
❑AMBIENT
STREAM
TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO WIROWSRO TSAT
A
,�1 EFFLUENTREPORT
8M
Other
O PLIANCE &CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Fnr I_ab rl— ON1 V
Lab Number:WUJ
/
Date Received:
C Time-(
Rec'd by-,
From: Bus-Courie and Del
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Shipped by: Bus Courier, tat Other/ EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S): /� /
_EaHmated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/ -130 �1100plusSTATION LOCATION:-5 t /� S %� 13 /Al6 h9rrI-` �I- �� 1
Seed: yes ❑ No JQ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No l� '�EMARICS: ---��� r µFr
Station #
S./P/ 11 s,1g_
)ale Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type
�/ _i v C1x 1 li3 1 {)� %� (} a H L
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/l
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100mi
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /I00ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total500 mg/1
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed $40 mg/I
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/l
16
Acidity to PH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/l
__
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 322I7 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/l
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH J 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and 011s 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate %S mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 m9A
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P. Dissolved as P 666 m9A
CA -Cadmium 1027 ugA
CrChrondun%Total1034 ug/1
Cu-Capper 1042 ug/1
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/l
Pb-Lead 1051 u9A
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ugA
AgSllver 1077 ug/1
AI Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 m9A
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fedron 1045 u9A
Composite Sample Type
T S B GNXX
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodlum 929 mgA
Arsenic -Total 1002 ug/1
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point 7L
Conductance at 25
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
PH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 83 PH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400 •
82244 431
82243 82242
20
Salinity %
Preclpitlon On/day)
Cloud Cover x
Wind Direction Meg)
tream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
W Ind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth it
Stream Width It
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

1
a•_ '_
1 \ A
DIVISION
OF WATFR QUALITY
Chemistry [Abornlory Report 115'ater Quality
v
0 SAIMpl FTYMi
\G 'Number :
Received:
4 W I277
3I9r20Ut
,• \
�E3
COUNTY
RIVER BASIN.
NORTH HAMPTON
PRIORITY
AMBIENT
Q A
EFFLU
X❑ STREAM ^ �E" -
tme
Received By
g. 30 AM
DS
r+ J
ecewcdved-
REPORT TO
RRO Rcgiwal Office
COMPLIANCE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE ' ("� ' ❑ IN -UENT ,• G^ ,
r) } n
Other
-
X❑ EMERGENCY
VISIT ID
ESTUARY ��
!�
Data .,leased :
AR
COLLECTOR(S) :
B TOWE11
Date Reponed
: 3/18/2004
v
\
Estimated BOD Range:
Station I. Galion: IfPSTRFAM OF SPIV �\
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remark.,:
-
Stall- 1
Dale Begin (yylmm/ddi
Date End iyylmm7dd)
Time Begin
Time End
Depth - DM, DR, DRRI
Value Type - A, F1.1,
Camposile-T, S,
Sample Type
UPSTREA "PILL
20040.308
I300
BOD 314 mgJL
COD Hi h 340 m
COD Low 335 m
Cotifarm: MF Fecal 31616 WOW
Coliform: MFTotal 31-W 1100ml
Cdiform: tube Fecal 31615 Itooml
Cotifornt; Fecal St 31673 II(x1mr
Residue: Tdal 5W mrJL
Volatile 505 mrjL
Fixed 510 mVL
.Residue: Suspended 530 mgJL
Volatile 535 m
Fixed 540 m
H 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 -VIL
Acidit to li g.3 d35 m
Alkalinity to H 8.3 415 mglL
Alkalind to H 4.5 410 m
TOC 680 mglL
Turbidil 76 NTU
Cohrorm Taal Tube "1100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940
Chi a: Tri 32217 u
Chi a: Corr 32209 ugfL
Pheophyl.. a 32213 uEJL
Color. True 90 c.u.
Color. (pH) 83 PH= c.u.
Color: PEJ 7.6 82 C.U.
C snide 720
Fluoride 951
FnrmAdehyde 71890
Grease and Oils 556 mgA.
Hardness Total 900 m .
Specific Cond. 95 umho.4cm2
MBAS 38260 m -
Pltcads 32730 uglL.
Sutfale 945 m
Sulfide 745 m
Balm
Tannin & Li nin IS
Hctavalcnt Chmmium ug1[.
Bicarbonate
Carbonate m
X
NH3asN610
0.07
m
X
TKN an N 625
0.35
m
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
1-3
mgA.
X
P: Taal as P 665
0.03
m -
P4t as P 70.507
P: Dissolved as P 666
mg/L
K-Po4acium
mgfr.
Cd- Cadmium 1027
u
C,Chmmium:Total t034
u
Cu-C Per I(W2
u
Ni-Nickcl 1067
uglL
Pb- Lc d 1051
ug/L.
Zn- Zinc 1092
u
V-Vanadium
ug/L.
A - Silver 1077
u
AI- Aluminum 1105
ug!
Be. Beryllium 1012
ug)L
Ca- Calcium 9t6
in
Co- Cnhdt 1037
uglL.
Fe- iron 1015
u
Li -Lithium 1132 u
Mg- Ma noaium 927 mgfL
Mn-Man arose 1055 urJL
Na- Sodium 929 m
Arscaic Total 1002 u
Sc- Selenium 1147 uriL
FI - Mcrcury 71%0 u
Ba_Barium u
annchlorine Pesticides
OrgivicipticKfilwieus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
BaccINCU[ml &Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
PuTgcable,Or anics(VOAbook 'd)
7PH Gasoline Rangc
TPHIBTEX Gasoline Ranee
Ph o lanklm

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER C1T FORM (DM;EFF
i
COUN Y- n�f�,(��_ PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN t"
REPORT TO: ARO FR R MRRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT STREAMLUENT
AT BM ❑ COMPLIANCE 6CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other f OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: But Courler, of . Other EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
Estimated ROD Range: 0-5/5-2 /25-65/40.130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: v`S 101f �• , r 51 '
Seed: Yes ❑ NIrf Chlorinated: Yea ❑ No LJ REMARKS: C
Station # jDate Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begin I Date End ITIme End Depth DM DB DBM
)Sfre4,,A
0Fsyi (
� o? j r,(�
1
BOD5 310
mg/I
2
COD High 340
m2A
3
COD Low 335
mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616
/100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504
/100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
/100m1
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673
/100ml
S
Residue: Total 500
m9/1
Volatile 505
mg/l
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8-3 415 mgA
16
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 690 mg/l
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/l
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/i
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color -(PH ) 83 ADM[
Color. pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/l
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/l
Lab Number:
Date Received!
U Time:
Rec'd b From: Bus -Hand De
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
ue type
A H L
NH3 as N 610 m9A
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
Total as P 665 mg/l
PO4 as P 70507 mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmfum 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromlum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/l
Nl-Nickel 1067 USA
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn•Zinc 1092 ugA
A ilver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 og/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/i
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/l
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/1
Composite Sample T e
T S R C G GNXX
LI-Lithium 1132 usA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/l
Mn-Manganese ]L055 ng/I
Na-Sodlum 929 mgA
ArsenicTotai 1002 ug/1
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organoplmsphortu Pesticides
Acid Herbicides -
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Tempemtun
D.O. mgA
PH
Alkalinity
1
Acidity
Air Temperature JO
pH 8.3 PH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
194
10
300 t
400 1 .
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity x
Precipitlon On/day)
Cloud Cover ><
Wind DirectionOeg)
Stream Hour Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Mean Stream Depth ft
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

AVW
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ChemistryLaboratory Report f Water Quality tj IL, Lab Nu 1414WI276
SAMPIFTYPF REt v 319f2004
COUNTY NORTH HAMPTON PRIORITY 8:30 AM
RIVER BASIN: AMBIENT QA El STREAM X Rocei,,&d B, 7 PS
REPORT TO - RPO Regional Office COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE F-1 174FLUENT
EMERGENCY "SIT ID ESTUARY Dana
COLLECTOR(S) B TOW]ML Date Reported: 3/2512004
Estimated BOO Range: Station Location: WOODS DS OF SPILL ENTRY SITE
Seed; Chlorinated: RenuuU-.
nation # Date Begin (yylmtWdd) Date End (y3dutzintildl Time &On Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A, H, L Cornpodte-T, S, Sample
rNWOODSDSOF SPELL 20040308 1 1045 1 1 1 1 1
K
BOD 310 120 mgfL
COD High 340 mg/L
COD 1-ow 335 mg/L
Colifom: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml
CoTiform: MYToud 31504 1100ml
Coliforim: tube Feral 31615 /10DITIL
Cofiforar Focal Strep 31673 (loom[
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 310 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 rn&/t
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 -9/1,
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8-3 435 MPJL
Alkalinity to pH 83 415 mg/L
Alkalinity in pH 4-5 4 10 -myt
TDC 68D mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
lColiform
Total Tube "1100 rnl!
I
70NVAENTS.-
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Mangimmic 1055 uFJL
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L
Ari;enic.'Total 1002 U91L
Sc- Selenium 1147 ug/l,
Hg- Mercury 71900 ugAL
lEaLBariunt ug/L
Ogariochlomc Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
B&w./Nieutral&Acid Exuactable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
1 Purgeabie Orgamcs (VOA battle req'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phroplanktoo

n,IVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATE UALIT EL -
COUNTY J� rn/ /� / {J✓ 1 PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN ` z-L-r2L✓g/? _ _
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MR RR WaRO W]RO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT �7 QA
AT BM ❑ COMPLIANCE )Q CHAIN
Other OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier f, Other EIdERGENCY
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5- 25f5/40-1 or 100 plus
�STATION LOCATION: W (j�
Seed: Yes ElN Chlorinated: Yes El No L? -KEMARKS: C /L)
rORM (DM1)
SAMPLE
Wwa­
STREAM 0EFFLUENf
❑ LAKE ❑ MWENT
❑ ESTUARY
r— lah rte. nm V
Lab Number: LfW
'♦
Date Received:.
//��
q
TIm ^
Rec'd b :
From: B -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Ds o F // Q h 4,-,, 54,4 Q &1 13 /.,3 / / -
Station ,
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM
Value Type
Composite
ds �1S Q f` S +11
CIS
U l 0
t Jr
U d3 4
�Ll
A H L
T S B
ra.ple
G GNXX
1
5005 310 miVl
2
COD High 340 mgA
3
COD Low 335 mg/l
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
5
Coliform: I4F Total 31504 /loom[
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100m1
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/1
9
Volatile 505 In
10
Fixed 510 mgA
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mgA
13
Fixed $40 mg/l
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 45 436 mgA
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/l
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 600 man
201
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mgA
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 USA
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/l
Color_ True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADM[
Color. pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and Oils 556 mg/l
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 Umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 USA
Sulfate 945 105/1
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TIN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/l
Ir: Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/l
Cd-Cadmium 1027 "A
CrChrornium:Totai 10M ug/1
GuCopper 1042 ng/l
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
ZrrZinc 1092 ug/1
Ag-Silver 1077 agA
AI -Aluminum 1105 ugA
Be-Bery0ium 1012 ug/l
Ca -Calcium 916 m9/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe -iron 1045 ugA
Li-Lithlum 1132 ugA
MgaMagnestum 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
Arsenic -Total 1002 ugA
Se -Selenium 1147 u9A
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlortne Pesticides
Organophosphonts Pestickles
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
LVater Temi;maene 10
D.O. m9/1
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (G
pH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 is
82244 431
92243 182242
20
Salinity X
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover X
Wind Dhec&m Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
132
136
11351
1350
g5
64
4
rust rtr..,r...t tnnu

to:
NC DENRIDWQ Chemistry Laboratory
Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: Sample [D:. ;&�-,-
Station Location: County:r� Region:
jample Type: '�'�:� Priority: CollectorOf ir7
r
Date collected: -/—� l� Date received:_I Date analyzed:
Affected Parameter(s): _ �� IZ414e
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ METALS
❑ NUT DO MICRO
T%'niples
flowing anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldshcct
Cl Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
Cl Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑ Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable re:
6/Other (soeciffw—.%o7/
Comments:
Corrective Action:
❑ VOA
❑ PEST
0
❑ SVOA
Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑ Analyst error — no reportable results
❑ Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acccptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ internal standards
❑ Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
❑ , Insufficient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date: / 1
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
❑ Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes No �J
Person Contacted: �� // Date:
�. Chemist Revie v initial): ❑ SVOA
BIOCHE `❑ PEST
❑ METALS ❑ VOA
Branch Head Review (initi
QA/QC Review (initi 1): Logged into database by (i
QATonnALaborauryLSAR IM , ldbr

/, DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry
i-6orawry Report! water Quali3y
Lab Number :
4W I278
CAMU.R TYPF
Date Received:
319f2004
COUNTY - NORTH HAMPTON
PRIORITY
Time Received:
9:30 AM
RIVER BASIN :
AMBIENT
QA
STREAM
X�EFFI_UF14T
Received By
DS
REPORT TO RRO
Regional Office
COMPLIANCE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
El LAKE
RNIFLUENT
n
Other _
EMERGENCY
VISIT ID
ESTUARY
Data R
AR
COLLECTOR(S) : BTOWELL
Dale Reported:
32512004
Estimated DOD Range:
Station L. tion: SPILL SITE RIB HOG FARM 81 I
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remarks:IVA?cation
7.1L
0
Date Degin (yy/rmoldd)
Dale End (yy/rruoldd)
T1nre Begin
Time End
Depth - DM, DB, DBMValue
Type- A, H, L
Compasite-T, S,ipTLCS1TE
2OW308
I E30
K
BOD 310 2300 mg/LCOD
High 340 mCOD
Low 335 myjL
Coliform: MT Fecal31616 /loom]
Coliform: MFTotal 3I504 /100m1
CD[iform: tube Fecal 31615 /loond
Coliform: Feral Snep 31673 /lo0ml
Residue- Tote! 500 mVolatile
505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Rcsidue, Suspended 530 mVolatile
535 mg1L
Fixed 540 mH
403 units
Aridity to 4-5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8-3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 11 3 415 mAlkalinity
to H 4-5 410 mTOC
690 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NI'U
Coliform Total Tube V100 ml
COMMENTS r
hloride 94o mg/LChi
a: Tri 32217 uglLChla:Corr
32209 uPheophytin
a 32213 uglL
Colo,. True 80 C.U.
Color- (H ) 83 pH= C.u.
Cola,- pH 7.6 82 c.aCyanide
720 tnglL
Fluoride 951 mFormaldehyde
71980 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/4Hardness
Total 900 -VXSpecific
Cond- 95 umhos/cm2
MBA$ 38260 mPhawk
32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mgJLBoronTannin
& Lignin ugILHexavalentChromium
ugILBicarbonate
mg/L
Carbonate mwL
NH3as N610 mTKNanN625
mg/LN02
plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mPO4
as P 70507 mg1L
PDissolved as P 666 mg&
K-Potassium mCd-Cadmium
1027 ug/L
Cr-Chmmium:Total 1034 UVLCu-
C 1042 ug/LNi-Nickel
1067 ug/LPb-
Lead 1051 uZn-
Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ag/L.Ag-
Silver 1077AI-
Aluminum 1I05 ug/L
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 uFJL
Li -Lithium 1132
Mg- Magnesium 927
Mn-Manganese 1055 u
Na- Sodium 929 m
Atsenic:ToW 1002 u
Se -Selenium 1147 uVL
Hg- Mercury 71900 uWL
Ba_Barium USIL
Organochlorine Pesticides
Cirganoompharus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
BasdNmtml&Acid Extractable Or2mcs
TPH Diesel Range
PurgeSible Organics (VOA baale mq'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPHIBTEX Gasoline Ran
Phytoplankton

For Lab Use ONLY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM tDMI)
'r / r COUNTY 11/ 1) � � ^" �� PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE T
RiVF3t BASIN C d2 l^ /14 r✓
❑AMBIENT
❑C LIANCE
vvEMERGENCY
❑ QA
CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
❑ STREAM
❑LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
EFFLUENT
❑ 94FLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO WiRO WSRO TS
AT BM
Other
Shipped by: Bus Courier, tat Other
Lab Namber:
Ito
Date Received: Time:
Ree'd b From: Bus-Couri and not
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTORS) l �� e ( f _
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5l5-25/25�5/ 130 or 100 pins STATION LOCATION:.5 1 � l s e- m U Ho 6
'I rr l
Seed: Yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No U REMARKS: u f S� - F/,r
Station 7•!
)ate Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin I Date End
y 1l .0 I/.3 P 16 Y. 03
1 i
---- ---
—
COD High 340
mg/l
2
3
COD Low 335
mg/l
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616
/100ml
4
5
Coliform: MY Total 31504
/loom]
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
/100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673
/100ml
7
o
Residue: Total 500
m9/I
10
Fixed 510 mgA
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mgA
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
i8
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mgA
n�
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mgA
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Con 32209 ugA
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 8o Pt -Co
Color:(pH 83 ADMI
Color. pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mSA
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 5S6 mg/i
Hardness Total900 moll
Speciiie Cond_ 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mgA
Phenols 32730 ugA
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
EndjDepth DM DB DSM IValue Type
i) I.. jl A H L
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 m9A
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/l
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromiumTota11034 u9A
Co Copper 1042 ug/1
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 agA
Z rMne 1092 ugA
ASSllver 1077 u9A
Al -Aluminum 110S USA
Be-Berynium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 moll
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Composite
T S B
Sample Type
GNXX
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927 mgA
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mgA
ArsenicTotal 1002 ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147 ugA
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Otgawg6osphotus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C I
Water Tempemium IM
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 40
PH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400 1&
822" 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
[ean Stream Depth fL
Stream Width fL
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
4

NC DENR/DWQ Chemistry Laboratory
to: %_� Sample Anomaly Report (SAR) - 4'
Lab Number: Sample 1D:
Station Location• �
oample Type: Priority:
Date collected: _5 Date received:
Affected Parameter(s):
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH ❑ ETALS
❑ NUT 8' MICRO
The f94owing anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
U//Samples
❑ Improper container used
❑ VOA vials with headspace
❑ Sulfide samples with headspace
❑ Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑ Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
❑ Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑ Holding time expired
❑ Prior to receipt in lab
❑ After receipt in lab
❑ Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑ Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑ Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑ pH out of range (record pH):
❑ Improper chemical
❑ Residual chlorine present in sample
❑ Color interference
❑ Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
�❑ -Sample bottle broken in la�bb - no reportable re Its
B' ()tticr (specify-1-_3Y _ �fi �_�rf�
Comments:
Corrective Action:
Region:
llector:.1�,
Date analyzed:
❑ VOA
❑ PEST
❑ SVOA
❑ Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure - no reportable results
❑ Analyst error - no reportable results
Cl Surrogates
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Spike recovery
❑ None added
❑ Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑ Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑ Internal standards
❑ Blank contamination
❑ QC data reported outside of controls (i.e. QCS, LCS)
❑ Incorrect procedure used
❑ SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑ Invalid instrument calibration
❑ Elevated detection limits due to:
/1 ❑ Insttffiicient sample volume
❑ Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date: 1 /
❑ Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ Sample(s) on hold until:
❑ Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:
❑ Other (explain):
Notification Required (circle one)? Yes No
Person Contacted: �� - .._ - % Date:
d Chemist Rev' w in- ial): / /JJ /
B10CHEM ❑ PEST �1'`e'�/_ ❑ SVGA
T METALS ❑ VOA
Branch Head Review (init' ):
QAIQC Review (inil al): Logged into database by (initial):.
QA\FortnALaborelary\yAR I oR3r'Ol dbs

STIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: DV 04-010 County: Northampton
Assessed Party: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Permit No. (if applicable): N/A Amount Assessed: $6,998.21
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Re uest For Remission Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearinz, and Sti ulation of
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Pleas be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five 'factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully annlied_ to the detriment_ of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION (attach additional pages as necessM):
C(4J

Murphy -Brown LLc
July 26, 2004
Mr. Steve Lewis #
Division of Water Quality
I617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 17699-1617
Mr. Lewis,
PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
In response to your letter dated June 28, 2004 regarding the assessment of civil penalties against
Farm 11, facility number 66-34 in Northampton County, I am requesting a remission or mitigation of the
fine amount of $6,998.21. The justification for this request is based on the fact that the Murphy -Brown,
LLC promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation, and took swift and
immediate action to reduce the risk of a re -occurrence in the future.
The facts of the case are not in dispute. For this reason, I have included the appropriate `Waiver
of right to an administrative hearing and stipulation of facts' form. We acknowledge that the violation in
question did, indeed, occur as described. In fact, we reported the incident to the Division originally and
detailed the situation much as described in the findings of fact. We feel, however, that the Division does
need to take into further consideration our acts immediately after the discharge in terms of cleanup, as well
the system changes made to prevent re -occurrence,
Upon discovery of the discharge, immediate action was taken to stop the flow of wastewater. Our
spill response plan, as outlined in our Environmental Management System, was then implemented, with a
spill response team being dispatched to the site in an effort to —recover as much wastewater as possible. At
the same time, the Division was contacted to make them aware of the situation. This quick response
resulted in much of the discharged wastewater being recovered and returned to the waste treatment system,
thereby greatly reducing potential environmental damage. The cleanup activities described cost
approximately $6000, but were effective in their intended goal.
An investigation of this discharge showed that the company policy specific to recycle system
operation were not followed. The employees responsible for this were terminated, and additional training
specific to this policy was carried out for every farm in this division. While we do not expect the Division
to give us 'credit' for this action, we do feel that the situation was dealt with in a judicious manner and,
while costly from a monetary standpoint, in a way that will prevent it from re -occurring again.
While not attached, I would ask that you review once again the March 10, 2004 response letter
sent to the division specific to this matter. It should be contained as part of your files. Murphy -Brown,
LLC is committed to compliance with all applicable rules and regulations, continuous improvement, and
pollution prevention. We feel our actions in this case demonstrate our commitment to these principles, and
ask that you grant our request for remission based on the facts presented.

If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
ly,
We crbeek
Environmental Compliance
Cc_ Johilnv Hassle

DWQ- - CIVIL ASSESSMENT REMISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: DV 2004 0010 Region -- Raleigh County: Northampton
Assessed Entity: Murphy -Brown Farm #11
() Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
Notes:
( x } Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
Notes: While actions by the company were quick, observations by staff indicate the
environmental damage associated with the spill migrated down % - 1 mile from the discharge
point. An estimated 8,000 gals. was discharged over a period of approximately 21 hours -as a
result of employees not complying with company policy.
{) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Notes:
{) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Notes:
O Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Notes:
Decision (Check one
Request Denied Full Remission Partial remission Amount remitted
to f4 6
Date I I Alan Klimek, P.E.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL. PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC _ ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 04-010
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $6 998.21 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated June 28.2004 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
rF`
This the a �' day of , ,"_� ,i , 200
SIGNATURE
�o o< JD D
�A' VC
TELEPHONE
4?/0 'L9 3 5 3 3 0

'f
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
July 29, 2004
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC .28398
RE: Remission Request
Farm # 11
Facility #66-34
Northampton County
File # DV 04-010
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
William G. Floss, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference on
October 6, 2004, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Ken Schuster, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Jg eim�, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Buster Towe11, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 04-010 w/ 3 attachments
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 OCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]/ fntemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper ;Vaturally

F
r �I
NtkwrmCDENN
E*~~ mm Rg&oL
EET
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART ; ENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND' NATURAL RESOURCES
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
M Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
I Pagan including cover sheet
FAX: `? o �' y - sz a7
TO: _ -
I
FROM: u�Sr�--LJ�— �� I �! DATE;
SUBJECT:_ I—`� l� I �}SSe sJ my e-
� I
MESSAGE: 1 I
! E�
,f

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
July 29, 2004
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
RE: Remission Request
Farm # 11
Facility #66-34
Northampton County
File # DV 04-010
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference on
October 6, 2004, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
25� Z4.1-r_z
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Ken Schuster, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
gJay�- ^rm3,n, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Buster Towell, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 04-010 w/ 3 attachments
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NQ Carolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / lntemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10916 Post Consumer Paper Natimally

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT } WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST } ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
T MURPHY-BROWN, LLC ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 04-010
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $6,998.21 for
violations) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated _ June 28, 2004 __, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the QL (. day of S--J
S
20 0
SIGNATURE
L
TELEPHONE
/e �-9 3 533 0

Murphy -Brown ILA
July 26, 2004
Mr. Steve Lewis 41
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 17699-1617
Mr. Lewis,
PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
In response to your letter dated June 28, 2004 regarding the assessment of civil penalties against
Farm 11, facility number 66-34 in Northampton County, I am requesting a remission or mitigation of the
fine amount of S6,998.21. The justification for this request is based on the fact that the Murphy -Brown,
LLC promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation, and took swift and
immediate action to reduce the risk of a re -occurrence in the future.
The facts of the case are not in dispute. For this reason, I have included the appropriate `Waiver
of right to an administrative hearing and stipulation of facts' form. We acknowledge that the violation in
question did, indeed, occur as described. In fact, we reported the incident to the Division originally and
detailed the situation much as described in the findings of fact. We feel, however, that the Division does
need to take into further consideration our acts immediately after the discharge in terms of cleanup, as well
the system changes made to prevent re -occurrence.
Upon discovery of the discharge, immediate action was taken to stop the flow of wastewater. Our
spill response plan, as outlined in our Environmental Management System, was then implemented, with a
spill response team being dispatched to the site in an effort to —recover as much wastewater as possible. At
the same time, the Division was contacted to make them aware of the situation. This quick response
resulted in much of the discharged wastewater being recovered and returned to the waste treatment system,
thereby greatly reducing potential environmental damage. The cleanup activities described cost
approximately $6000, but were effective in their intended goal.
An investigation of this discharge showed that the company policy specific to recycle system
operation were not followed. The employees responsible for this were terminated, and additional training
specific to this policy was carried out for every farm in this division. While we do not expect the Division
to give us `credit' for this action, we do feel that the situation was dealt with in a judicious manner and,
while costly from a monetary standpoint, in a way that will prevent it from re -occurring again.
While not attached, I would ask that you review once again the March 10, 2004 response letter
sent to the division specific to this matter. It should be contained as part of your files. Murphy -Brown,
LLC is committed to compliance with all applicable rules and regulations, continuous improvement, and
pollution prevention. We feel our actions in this case demonstrate our commitment to these principles, and
ask that you grant our request for remission based on the facts presented.

If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
r1
.ara�l.eeL
Environmental Compliance
Cc: JohAnv Hassle

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: DV 04-010 County: Northampton
Assessed Party: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Permit No. (if applicable): N/A Amount Assessed: $6,998.21
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Pleas be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G; S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfull applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
✓ (b) the violator nromntly abated continuing environmental damage resultine from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION (attach additional pages as necessary):

0� W A r�;,QG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jack Keane, General Manager
Murphy -Brown's
PO Box 1240
Waverely, Virginia 23890
Dear Mr. Keane:
March 30, 2004
Notice of Violation
Notice of Intent To Enforce
Murphy -Brown's Farm # 11
COC AWS660034
Northampton County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
On Sunday, March 7, 2004, Mr. Buster Towel] of the Raleigh Regional Office responded to an
emergency spill call at the subject swine operation located on High Bridge Road in Northampton County.
It was determined that an estimated 8,000 gallons of wastewater had run out from under the back door of
barn number 8 and entered an unnamed tributary to Cypress Creek within the Chowan River Basin.
Murphy -Brown's response letter dated March 10, 2004, has stated that employee negligence was
The cause of the spill, and that the employees responsible for this event have been terminated.
While the Division appreciates the swift response to this event, the discharge of wastewater to surface
waters of the State without the required permit is still considered a violation of NCGS 143-215.1(a), and as
such is subject to civil penalties of up to S 25,000.00 per day, per violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office has recommended to the Director that the appropriate enforcement action be
taken. If you wish you may submit any additional comments in writing to the Raleigh Region within ten
days of your receipt of this Notice. If you have any other questions concerning this matter you can contact
Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: Northampton County Health Department
Ms. Betsy Gerwig, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
PAMN
CDEPtt phone [phone] Customer Service
Awally
ehCarolina
facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748

AGa
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown, LLC
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
RE: Remission Request
Farm #11
Facility #66-34
Northampton County
File # DV 04-010
Dear Mr. Westerbeek:
s
July 29, 2004
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference on
October 6, 2004, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
2�� Z_�
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Ken Schuster, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Jay Zimmerman, Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
sBuster-Towell; Raleigh Regional Office w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 04-010 w/ 3 attachments
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617
512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.ne.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
On
e
NCarolina
;Vatimally

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CNIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
MURPHY-BROWN LLC ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 04-010
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $6 998.21 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated _. June 28, 2004 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the a (. day of
SIGNATURE
RESS
TELEPHONE
6/b �93 5330
E
L�

Murphy -Brown LLc
July 26, 2004
Mr. Steve Lewis
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 17699-1617
Mr. Lewis,
PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
In response to your letter dated June 28, 2004 regarding the assessment of civil penalties against
Farm 11, facility number 66-34 in Northampton County, I am requesting a remission or mitigation of the
fine amount of $6,998.21. The justification for this request is based on the fact that the Murphy -Brown,
LLC promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation, and took swift and
immediate action to reduce the risk of a re -occurrence in the future.
The facts of the case are not in dispute. For this reason, I have included the appropriate `Waiver
of right to an administrative hearing and stipulation of facts' form. We acknowledge that the violation in
question did, indeed, occur as described. In fact, we reported the incident to the Division originally and
detailed the situation much as described in the findings of fact. We feel, however, that the Division does
need to take into further consideration our acts immediately after the discharge in terms of cleanup, as well
the system changes made to prevent re -occurrence.
Upon discovery of the discharge, immediate action was taken to stop the flow of wastewater. Our
spill response plan, as outlined in our Environmental Management System, was then implemented, with a
spill response team being dispatched to the site in an effort to recover as much wastewater as possible. At
the same time, the Division was contacted to make them aware of the situation. This quick response
resulted in much of the discharged wastewater being recovered and returned to the waste treatment system,
thereby greatly reducing potential environmental damage. The cleanup activities described cost
approximately $6000, but were effective in their intended goal.
An investigation of this discharge showed that the company policy specific to recycle system
operation were not followed. The employees responsible for this were terminated, and additional training
specific to this policy was carried out for every farm in this division. While we do not expect the Division
to give us `credit' for this action, we do feel that the situation was dealt with in a judicious manner and,
while costly from a monetary standpoint, in a way that will prevent it from re -occurring again.
While not attached, I would ask that you review once again the March 10, 2004 response letter
sent to the division specific to this matter. It should be contained as part of your files. Murphy -Brown,
LLC is committed to compliance with all applicable rules and regulations, continuous improvement, and
pollution prevention. We feel our actions in this case demonstrate our commitment to these principles, and
ask that you grant our request for remission based on the facts presented.

If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
r,
�e_w�ev
Environmental Compliance
Cc: Johhnv Hassle

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: DV 04-010 County: Northampton
Assessed Party: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Permit No. (if applicable): NIA Amount Assessed: $6,998.21
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of
Facts " form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Pleas& be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors* listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty_ assessment factors in N.C_G.S. 143B-282.1{b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of f the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent future
occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous „violations;
(e) payment of the civil enal will prevent payment for the remaining necess
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION attach additional pages as necessar

MEMORANDUM
April 16, 2004
To: Jeff Poupart, Nondischarge
Compliance Supervisor
Through: Ken Schuster, P.E.
RRO Regional Supervisor
Through: John Hunt, Environmental Engineer
From: Buster Towell, Environmental Specialist
Subject: Murphy -Brown's Farm # 11
Discharge Enforcement Case
On Sunday, March 7, 2004, at approximately 3:00 pm I received a call from Steve Lewis who had the
ER pager for the Central Office that weekend. Steve said that he had received a call from Murphy -Brown's
that notified the Division of a spill that occurred earlier the same day from the subject swine operation.
Steve knew that I was carrying the pager that weekend for the RRO so he notified me.
I responded to the spill and arrived on the farm at around 5:30 pm. I met with Kel Terry who immediately
showed me wastewater in a ditch on SR 1328, which he had traced further, down stream to a large beaver
pond. Since it was getting dark we looked at the back end of the closest spray field to the stream where
Murphy -Brown's employees had been making efforts to pump the wastewater back up on to the spray field.
The distance from the creek to the field was probably 400-500 yard up hill, and it seemed that these efforts
were not getting the desired results. It was clear that it would be very hard to recover all of the wastewater
that had spilled. Shortly afterwards it became too dark to see and I told Kel that I would return to the farm
early the following morning.
At around 9:00 am I met with Kel and Johnny Hassell on site to further investigate the cause of the spill. It
was determined that production employees had left the recycle pump on for 21 hours straight. Company
policy dictates that all recycle lines will not be operated when all employees have left the farm. Murphy -
Brown's conducted their own in-house investigation, which resulted in several production employees,
including the farms manager being terminated.
Johnny and I walked the stream as far as we could walk and both agreed that the spill traveled for between
'/< and 1 mile to where the large beaver pond widened out and was near impossible to follow. I pulled
several samples all along the route of the spill, including an extreme upstream sample. There are only a few
digital photos available due to the disk being full after the first evening.
Please find the following information relating to this Case:
I . NOV1NO1 to Murphy -Brown's Farm # 11 dated March 30, 2004
2. Murphy -Brown's Response letter dated March 10, 2004
3. Copy of the Inspection Report dated 318104
4. Lab Sheet and COC
5. Finding and Decision and Assessment Factors
6. Copy of Green Card
7. Maps
8. Digital Photos
If additional information is needed please call Buster Towell at the RRO [phone].

Murphy-,BrownLLC
March 10, 2004
Buster Towell
Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1628
Re: Action Plan Report for
Dear Mr. Towell:
i-34
On Sunday, March 7, 2004 at approximately 2:00 PM, a Murphy -Brown Land and
Nutrient Management (LNM) employee, Larry Majette, contacted his supervisor, Kelvin
Terry, to inform him that wastewater from barn 8 at Farm l I had exited the back door,
and had traveled to a tributary of Wiccacanee Swamp. Murphy -Brown LNM staff
notified DWQ personnel, and measures were immediately put in place to contain and stop
the flow of wastewater. Temporary earthen dams were established in the affected
drainageway, and the contained water was then irrigated on to crops located on the farm
in accordance with state permit requirements.
This discharge occurred due to an obstructed flush line that had been. blocked for an
estimated 21 hours. Approximately 8,000 gallons was discharged, calculated based on
the time to fill 2 — 800 gallon flush tanks and the flush frequency at that site. Our internal
investigation determined that the barn manager left the farm Saturday, March 6 at
approximately 1:30 PM and two herdsmen left shortly after at approximately 2:30 PM,
leaving the production area unattended. The flush system was not shut off during the
time in which employees were absent, which contradicts current company policy.
The current Murphy -Brown flushing procedure states that "the time the recycle system is
to be running should be scheduled around the normal working hours of the farm so that
the system will not be operating while unattended for a substantial period of time." We
train all Murphy -Brown employees to the policies and procedures associated with our
Environmental Management System, in order to ensure that the highest regard for
environmental protection is met. The barn manager and herdsmen at this site were in no
way instructed to act in the manner in which they chose. Immediate and swift action was
taken against these individuals, and termination followed for violating Murphy -Brown
policy.
Please understand that Murphy -Brown has no tolerance for this display of negligence.
The company considers the responsibility of avoiding permit violations a condition of
employment with the company, and takes necessary action to see that incidents such as
this do not continue to occur. In addition to the disciplinary action against the employees

M
involved, heightened emphasis on these procedures are being communicated to all levels
of production employees.
Please find attached the press release that was sent to news outlets in Northampton
County on Tuesday, March 10, contingent to N.C. General Statute Article 21 Chapter
143.215.0
If any additional information is needed, please contact me at 252-578-1827 (c) or 252-
826-6516 (o). Thank you.
Sincerely,
Johnny Hassell
North Carolina Land and Nutrient Manager
Murphy Brown, LLC Waverly Division
CC: DWQ Central Files
Jack Keane
Kraig Westerbeek

April 13, 2004
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1628
L� '
� 152004
Notice of Violation d!
Notice of Intent To Enforce
COC AWS660034 �E�t
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Schuster;
I would like to offer some additional comments in response to your letter dated
March 30, 2004. Murphy -Brown makes every effort to comply with all permit
requirements and, in many cases, has made the effort to exceed these requirements. As
demonstrated in Murphy -Brown, LLC's EMS manual, we feel that employee training and
awareness are key to this effort. To insure that our employees understand what is
expected, there are very specific policies and procedures contained in our EMS manual
that address environmental issues specific to each and every farm position. Regretfully,
in this particular case, there were employees that failed to follow these very well outlined
procedures, which resulted in a release to the waters of the State as noted in your letter.
As mentioned in my letter dated March 10, 2004; swift and immediate action was
taken against this negligence, and termination followed immediately. I ask the Director to
please take into consideration as part of determining enforcement action, our position, our
response, and our effort to eliminate potential problems of this nature in the future. The
actions taken were swift, and involved substantial cost to this company. While the
discharge referenced is most regrettable, we feel that the appropriate actions have been
taken to prevent this sort of thing from happening on this farm again in the future.
Any additional information that we can provide will be available upon request. As
well, I am certain we can ask for your guidance in the future.
YlIour Friend In Agriculture,
Vv
William J. assell
North Carolina Land and Nutrient Manger
Cc: Northampton County Health Department
Jack Keane
Kraig Westerbeek

f _ '
Michael F. Easley, Governor.,
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Res6urces f
' � t
Alan W. Klimek, P. E Director
Division of Water Quality nab ` :!
r J
August 4, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL` i
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 11
PO Box 1240
Waverly VA 23890
Subject. Facility Number.66- 34-National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit
Dear Smithfield Carroll's Farms:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has been required by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) to develop a NPDES permit program for animal waste management systems.
The Division has developed a general NPDES permit similar to the state Non -Discharge
General Permit that this facility is currently permitted under. Pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statues §143-215.1, 40 Code of Federal Regulations §122.23, and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated May 9, 1994, coverage under the General NPDES permit is required of all
facilities that have had a discharge of wastewater reaching Waters of the State.
According to our records your facility meets the requirement for an NPDES permit based on the
discharge criterion. Please sign and submit the enclosed NPDES Short Form B — Existing
Facility. Please carefully follow the instructions on the form.
Please submit completed enclosed application within 60 days from receipt of this letter. Failure
to submit the application as required may subject your facility to a civil penalty and other
enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
If you have any questions about the new NDPES permit, the enclosed applications, or any
related matter please feel free to contact J R Josh! at 919-733-5083 ext. 363.
Sincerely,
M. Paul Sherman, P.E.
Cc: Northampton -County Soil and Water Conservation District
cR . Regional -Office, Division of Water Quality
Permit File AWS660034
I�D�R
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http,,//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

. - -
E
I . - - -
1 _ y N _'�%A j' F 13� }.,�J 0Y y'�i1• yav 7
.., •• 1t
I ' I , , ' 1Jd c s4.
^! ref
• ... ' .. . 'r +'
. •, . . • .
. I ;
• !�
, 1 . . •r ,, . . . .
. - ,
p ' 1 , rink' , •.r .r .
.. ,,
.. "nfr t'.:. ! Q Sri IRC ppp n wr`",�..i1
. ' '. K,% •' 1.4 'r - , , 1'F k- Lry ♦. 1 ; "' tr' •'. ,
�An+ J T
• s-.^ F ' 1 ; I s ;,,1� k ;, , .'' .."a 7 r6aU, toµ,-y'i.M•• - ,y r` " ,.t'"< I'.-1.
rr '> 'ii r Ybn� y '' i-Se a,i ." k'I -r' r
.:... r f t . t tk� *��¢�f 1 ,y -1-"' I , yy ��..^ r M . Vt , {". ';r
�, i "t I i 'r `7 1 4: , -; T r A. . ' .
, .
. , _ �' ,
Y..y. t A. 4 �- r�`rtl t .
5
h ..� r '� .
r .. r%v «tr i F I t, �
., r > S r Ve 1 ; S
• , f ly 7 ar , lr'a 11 r �. s - p r s t'm, v
j } 41 g, i i 4 �}
4 ; :�, v1° ! j e' � 42 , r ; 1�?u St W w 'i�'t •r�%" s" i 44
1 _ r ''L:. r , r '-i '., *'AI' 7 AM `?�{. Ire 5i .�" {
.r .. 4 • . y r k gtF . ``,%. , ,
0�4 ` pr 7r" �� 6ri� ai.: rl. r - �'1 t S? -+ 11¢+<, , �',61
R��� sy +, r�� ' 1., Ft 7i`- i . �Y� Inr r i•i� e j+Si.;� .r< fir`
araw Lis: r-:5�}CIS t , s 7r ., r7 �' r '1 w.:'yw �... I ,I "r x - fi yA'i .'S 't. ,; ..
s'` T'"�.`FSts'S yr4 OJT vr'ar yr. �i. i ' ,. .� .rt1 } ff, 5,-'1' i 1� r ,1i 'dj",: r'rr u. }!✓ !
r `'" 'T.''k`-+i i hG�""'S °`tit"`fr"•.�" •.c:" -r r , r _ l -.,. .
p til l'
1, y; V kr 11 w ` •. ,;a r 7N4
� . - 1, ;r" - . ' Ih• 9 „'• _ ." .'. ;r), 3 ,.r.V'+.y
��?R, A '" ja""' f '• j.� s'I k`Lh , . ,'1 }�, V , .z r r '
.>: r ,0 t1 T' Ali' ,.' f n
,yV �yi. nr' _.,tlt4n iF�' r ` ' +*i . r , r 1 ' -r V.'
yY r z'r t-', 't' °P' µAS t , 1 I� :;,yy�T�`y i' , I °, w .•: ',a f Wr!, w ry.., ' x { + ! 4' 1'- r t
,`5.!"f illy a i. k a t �, ✓d »'a ., ,S i; +' Ir 4 r* h, i .r ''.'�' 'r r a:, t s ; +I
... �; y `i' r 4? , ;'4'! 0.,, .1� +rv`. O.gj i . + ir'"'1 , " !� �'.>.,Y 4 x `4.a, t�, ..t, _ ,.t r r - hr
. r1 -•r � ! '., y.-r':,tL x,J :,..t...,l, g, 11 T _ , r r y ,y • , R
C w - ' C .r"�'_4 ``+++c..dfffi' �a�r�•n.,„ .�.�. ^�i`.y s....� - t 'r , tr',' r. , HI ,:. > s,
iY� � ; yl. r 7_'I `1' J' r '�'�' i� ,� ar t, rP,-,1 S V,r ' a i 9 r i. ,,r �. t Yl :1Y
_. - _ _ ! i t r - �; yL, 51 : ,[ ir, 'L, ! - ` ' y t i. �y
fir. .i . pp��: '� r i r �YY�',1-r � �t ���}'y; WrY: ` 11 � � i of r *'' ',t � v„y,"' 1 4 Fy 1 -i�, ! .�1{{ "�^'+y. ji. P 4 3 de d d5. i t r I Li• ,S i f ? "-. ` j Mi j err r�yy,�g''R ""y� � xr �y r 5i'�1 ]" ' t S t -r . fi ail �
hi , 4 ., y '� , r �I f rr `r.A¢T»"t18,O4,'�, kO" �,' h r (�y§i• "{{'4ea,�5� C lakp •Ai
.. , 4 s 'r t , r . ,ii1r4' r ;:.ga r � � re `� l r S .y , c. , f
.. - t• r )- ",; a,r' ,-,ay Rr' Y•+—�,z---� x,.r 1 c 7p-1 r "v+. �
.. - } {i x y. A ,4..,- e i 7 1 dri. s � 'i._ ' . '. , 1 ,,11J.jj ,'` ta�dy1."r ,�-+(.�
Ir
1 -, , 1 11ir, 4 M *. if '14.tii r.•:'"`; 5 y -4 � i- et s ,tom.!? L ,
^ ,,.. , �' h 'r ' rat HV ,�r1 i.w,r �'� , TT `•-""' '�' „ �,"'n.g �
rt
' .., r t ` ,' L r. t 5 � ,W j1 r f' S W i; �k d' V' > OI,.y 5� f, r "4r�ry ...5 i
>4• ' S,; r c V. ,Rar . a '!ts [+.' qr F , � {t �' a j ,: r, ' r 'l flf i •^'`ir; I I
I'' 's i r` s i . t ,a I Y.
; h k ti7 p ¢'+; .. .
"'I
'reiy'.,eifd i.—i ti r�' .r ' 1 rq 3 ..; 1� x�-,.0 y11 a" 1 fY4r
x. n.a"wr. .+.a:uu`:k'�''.m- 'rP_.,,Irl,r� 5' •kcJ `&+ot.,�^,=fy4',re•e \.r+r .,,1I j `;' "t
� d j, 4 y 4 m r f;" �1+ i„
1 , 11 I T r I .SRT ,• i s, . 7 5ti -[Y "�'-. ' "i
1 .A r , Jt 4 l .r + :, `•, f d -r r 61 • r \ ri:
• ' S R}I �' i ~ ', J'-4:` r3 x .."': t ,14 �' - _ `a t.r ''L a s L ..` ` 3, i
In til `r .,.A r , ri t , r 1"
. f .,'-"•'T i:a •` i J f,l. 1 ,1N �i"• r', 1 I :,,. ,s ',. t y.f:.i�' } -•-Y r
i Y k.{ \ 46 r i ' r • i X r F 5t.i { i x d r'
h �t �`l..�1}1••J , , ,M Rw A4 " W Y 1. r ' ,..._f ,o-: 4, i 1 a1 Fa P''^� tYr 1 P" , 4 k 1 r. S'hi i ,K q, rrFr1 Miai,R} µ, W l' .,I aRy Y . rai.' t y -F 9
C.. , +' '^^'''i'�Y�c r �t'r ,fir•TWlaL 'r- !y9 r {SA .a U,�'y 1. .>. .r ., t+ ,�
"rrll' r,y, 4i4 ,.!r1 d � . i , af_r' a # ,y y �-V' ,?' rl415k. •+` , 1 rr-r1.' •, 4 - •�- Lr.
J r 4' ,. w+/ i{r, r T A C„"',L Y *�' f'y"'+`*..i-' '
yi' 4' yy {1p.°,�y,,4� 1 �I i t r : f. 1 r'! y cky
IJ„I,'' � \ , S }NfY� I fir' } Mr ` V d h [. :,}I' 11 "' 4 .—' ^ W �r'}�' , .. ; `" } `
.. - I CCC S �Y r f1ta.E 1 .. ,tr
;sr,' I� eft'}y. "�.,.w. ,v w ! ,r.� if4 1. .. 1 i t. -nh S 7!+
,d ,it, rTl J��j't Y,,,`,� f } I Er 1 '`l.i * ,,^. ' . � + tpr-,
. i T�7n� ., 3 4_w I � 4 . i s 7 1 � � . r , to `r � � s{ r :r l
. y j}�" d. y °"7pj�� 19- ' ` f S �' h - M _ t d,f .u*�,.I �r Fi`�'', J1'�.Nn �',"'Nii;.;
' Y ° F t 'rr ' FF`. is r 44 1 ',fa , ��, r'{ S'r - �t - .I } '�`i, t 11,x n,: Aa ,3 , . i } t.�� 't rkl. ",`�'�s�'nV ' j, :�' k�
iJ i%l 5 t M `G}} S,yY i4 11
r.. }S F 1* ,r i ,a�T,.',.. ,^1 x " nu Y,g n raQ'� ., 4:.... ' r rrly! ' is F.q�,p 4 d' ' �, � S
.. - . - i. ` G ,4 1. h =S 'I I. ' ti r��j`��rx}.rY � _.i< "�y'y�: ll/'�� i� wr.,�5r�+ka �>�` � I
i+. 't; •s r., i , �ai'Y- P , I ' , -., y 4 . , !' ,.� ,r -1''` f,—j T . ihti, ,.,,,yy1p Q4,4} 'l- i
r . . ' -• a.rl'",'_---_.5r'^Lf- ,. I_, ra r! l , , , t KY •Y *. d ,ae
• .. r -r t� • i! s s s Y _ �y ' r . r l t . - , ,«, 1`i? h. '-' ✓ 4- b
- , 9✓
r
,t,..1�r a .1_ : , r O, i ' 1L x t 4 f? , Fr yr; Lr, l,�iq' �! 1 d ,
I.f! ( d } by r ar , ...rt 1Sd - - :; �` 1+ ., f. «.ti'd + - Ts i1 C.44i7 r�N.
" a , yI" t ^' ny ;r , .'AT" , 'r llr i ,V i?AW +1 , ;. « i fi 'YI -a',r h I.r ; . t •." Mr C" , aWACb x dA' (,t'ie } $:k K v "j',
t -'" i. { 7, a „' a . _ d Y1 r"a I, v S:'. •gtn�'•`4, , ', {
x a 5:1 r. F A{.:x ,1 ar" r q �' 7 1 {y'�, �, a",4 'L``& ,.-Sr
F t L 7 x 1 ta:.. .'{ t s , :F d' c 7' .1 a s :i a r
r 1`i 1� y h _'.t* i; I i x -+r - +� r m[f,�ri ' }i r ,� �d2 a i�,a'"'+I„y z15.°.4 k
�f,. = ia1 ' " yt . s :ri, . r ,,e' Y Q r rt { T tr `.4 f c S'!rm r � 5 ��r rrj .is 1 , � '?'Ar
a �.' a r , } k
. 'y 4 t" f "',' , tii , [ €€` + = V+ r s },4t L ;= a 4 t �, t x ; ,. x F : y a q r`,
• x T` d �,.. ! d k r; +. _ • ,T, t 1 g .. 4Sr f, t-• {. - ,yr V F Y,
J r 'a y r ^ 4 ffi R f t` S i d `�k 1k 1+ i f y
+"A- 1` r x r, '' ,.t? r u , . a S 1{d , n +. %ti.ettl ti Yj L ,4 •..
r, q tY'—• ri' ., �. -F n1. 'r y' .Y'. 1. '1', i'r x K� rytpv4-'$'{fib .., r•,Z';} a
r.. "K,-, �.. n r r d C. .� i r " .. C Y r i! _ p { 'r '' 1- a-�rri��M"`r ,1, s e�•,. N* , ',v}k
r 'vs-., , t • e�+W ,.:'s ,�, 4 i t,.`,, 4 r y}.- '� ryr9 Y.n .: '}j 5' �; -r . ; , , ' ' i s .. rf. ! 3 �a ��,.+,, h. - � r i s f ' •:
,T C r . J,{a 2A W.1 r 1 L w , r,, & x�'h�' S. J1r;.1 t•' 1'ay'f� i �+�'r tL, / fw Cs, 'r'; {1!irt�t�'YPg s r 1,r51 .,� 1 ,�1;f, r':'c 1 . �T
s'.�� , 1 _ i? r +M F 4,. ,, p , sy r..y: +'l _ -4e T . r` „><
« , �`!" -w -, C'=.. .`n ' a}` �.' ' .',�'x.�,,r. 't`h�,r "siV �`, rx�, ryylT"- A ri �,- r .^":" : >' , 1, ! ' .. ' r ' ``rG, `" 1 x "o, , g, f
r. s v e« '�., b St: �. 1 1 - V z n.r y, �;� r r" 4. E r p''. s h r g
:.dry uirk.,ixl['. . «, rs . a. t't' da t `" r' L i'"4 k t�. ra`I ',}: r., - ... - �a e:� 1+•j. ' •. � ... " r 1 ` y4
', Ar. i_. * .;C 5.. S ni-,:i,d�f j,'•:'2.c1 -.l> t a- .�',:,V,r'-r. 1 _ r.'e, 1r t t. j :e 1 r ar`.t
.P h y 1 - t .•, J - Y
_ f ti,.t.. - - t = A- r `-w l,, '< -. t L S r s , - ` ,
/.! ' ii �Jir r 5 Jt,:t,tj . 4l.' p � r 'L.s r+-,r '' -jy" � t.• r 1 i. .I S
-V ' j '`' 1'. L- a ,eEs } .y i V c K u t°°' yy rt ,a .rj 6 T s'.',"--'.%1— . `""'i,r•r'?'"'' 7 ' `J ''t 1t F '; r JJ �F p
r ter.- y NU , .fk'9'4 r .'1%% r 1 yA;.,t , .r t)^ I, & ,may} >•. Yam,„. 4t"sSjt".i,t`--Yr"l,,m k4 ,1:�-•,,.' r r _ .+ -yfi �,y._{ , 1 f,• it 1
{i .t'r ' x f'1 I - :f v- . ; „�g,'�p ry. ,4:lks: 'far*, ' x ;r' 'j, `i', :,,. A�.j„:" i"• `�,.,.A �.4 - , .`� .� . ti ,e3' ° o-f',�.o ; T f�::'t is. �`,r 1Y;1
p• r j -,' 4 : ak tT' eT 1 r 1 f Y , 'r ri' j" !",TI,f ; �!r - +, p' yyAR t�k yy f t A' .:{ }-y,_ '.11.... 4; -e4 P I. "M{ } -?• 6 v n,4 :r it yr,x, r
y r4,f? i. Tr -v� tid ':£..'� ry- it .sg, .s4 ,W �`..1,,- �FI'M,yritFir V `�`rwir 4 'y ;'i• �1. �r... .. J. ., 1 r.:-.0 ,C \. «�.sk '. Y rr r- �}'
{ : G C "r' . tv-; `r kr i' r' !"�.f A ; k : ,I'' 1'i' N t Q 4i i- ,. t . ,— . .,. !;ih A - £ ; ,T' 1. a
t t,r',_ S f '" v`,' 3".� h �'k' ' l;�C-"` $3,!1 �i 'i " p, 3, ya, ' f •T;.t , 1" _ Tir'. 6 „`'s r^• r;�.ty d i':1'V:.,, ta• �_ 1a.-
x :>1 ,,: �, � Y�}.rr "`v '4'. '"5,.1 .r'rs "i i` ,* _ •r. >_�.-1aa "' ° �,�:'.. V +
-:a ,'•, ti''I.'t ? v .°i •"n"'+-° r f ti. 4uti'1 IJ' ,R;y p, 5Lk 1� �C vW` a, *- r}t aYj9 . ' r 4. 'l+s vM -1i ' �•. 4 .`,. , ��:.
.' s `i'; ^ - 1 M ' M-: ,YiFa s' ' -i T, }a L•�.. r - 7 r r �1` f• 4";—tir.""t "••' ; J
'p= V sk -�' �' -`.{ h?fsr�y V- ?.ry, 1 ,rye •1• 'ra -ar Cs Ta' -;Zr ..t; i
e . r � k Y .r ' ��T, S - ,,, � a" '�-7 - .I. ' :r, � dIY* r rI. ..r . -.' r y.
§�:�a Q d J r . } ;j. ,.�,- ti ,, �N-��'V4: ahm :"ria , •✓ri '1: �'N, fit, s, r.� --r lr a, t`, x . �, -'' , 4- .a..4� _i r 1 y: I.r• r`, - i ,f:
err.; M. :, `:R, LT ;#y r •,,:r '-E t ,,c.C, rx:' p..2t `` d `�. ' s..'r' y 5:., 1. :tk 2 !4'+i"- 't w y5.' �:fi i. r+'f i-%%. ' ".a ;t, .. `1 J .,w ••'1,..
r1;..n -1 , -'r JY . .v �' ? ,_3',,fy: �," .,, , � pi r x .`.; w a ,r ..,� ' i}? .i,- ti x"+.i o e y `,.�
r!}. ,i 'h = ::.,{i '•' 1••. V 7""'.1 '{� rj,ii.`• $h••- 1e rP Yi ti. 3>J' 'hr7
: x }i' S � , tS'r, , :d+ y; a, yyr tut '' }b r,i ?,r `f rya .. t 5f i , iu � * ,.� :i • r /kr.
,.rr., .y , d .,�y, a� �.' �'i�a A �" i ; :+R . t '�"7A C} 'a y
.�' 4— i i it i t 1 r r• M ,�, R . M, r,.f}7 .E' �.6 Ci�,9 J.§ d4'.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, 'Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609
919/571-4700
File Access Record
SECTION
TIME/DATE
NAME
REPRESENTING:
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the.Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our
custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to
safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read carefully the following
uidelines before slanina the form:
1. We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files.
Appointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00_apm. Viewing time ends at 5:00
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision is available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may
review at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits. Cost
per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than 25 copies - there is no charge for
less than 25 copies; payment may be made by check, money order, or cash at the reception
desk. You can also be invoiced.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM. Files may not be taken from the
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor
for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment -has been refused.
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
1. r 4 rye �� (Va r4 IM
2.
3.
4.
5.
Signature and Name of Firm/Business at Time In Time Out
Freese attach a bushmm cmd to dots fine

_LG!
•NOV ROUTING SLIP
• 1)Type of violation (pick one):
illegal discharge
_ (discharge)
oil spill
inspection of minor source
_
(oil spill)
_ (inspectmin)
inspection of major source
(inspectmaj)
pretreatment
_ (pretreat)
wetland
(wetland)
poultry operation
_ (poultry)
swine operation
X (swine)
dairy/cattle operation
_ (cow)
other
_ (other)
2) Will the vio. result in a recommendation
of enforcement? (y, n, ?)
! i
3) Is the violation resolved? N
4) Target date for enforcement report? w✓ 4
. 5) Comments (50 spaces) f e torJ kee�-V
5) Routing OPA-(initial/d
3 /?to3
U
r�
U
r�
,46 , 3Y
A W S 6 �&03q

.,o
!ME 1ACDrVrrT?'1_-
mr
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGN REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
March 16, 1998
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carroll's
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Farm # 11
Permit No. AWS660034
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On March 3, 1998, Mr. Buster Towell
Regional Office conducted a compliance
;subject animal operation. This inspection
5
gDivision's effort to determine compliant
;Animal Waste Management Regulations.
from the Raleigh
inspection of the
is a part of the
e with the State's
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from
your facility was not actively discharging to the surface
waters of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches,
or other
willfully
result of
observed:
prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of
discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a
the inspection, the following deficiency was
Record keeping at these facilities needs improvement.
There should be copies of the waste application records
kept on site on the approved forms labeled IRR-1 and IRR-2.
These forms should be separated by field number,crop type,
and crop cycle so that an accurate determination of
nitrogen balance can be assessed. These records are to be
signed by the Operator In Charge designated for each
facility. On the date of inspection no records were
available to indicate amounts of wastewater and nutrients
applied. Without these records there is no way to
determine compliance with the State's regulations.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, 6UJTE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX OIO-571-4718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

.7
• Mr. Rudy Grammer
` Page 2
•
•
•
The deficiencies regarding record keeping should be corrected to
reflect an accurate record of land application activity at the
subject farms. The Raleigh Regional Office suggests that you check
your records and adjust them accordingly back to the first of
calender year 1998. By doing so, the facilities can again be
considered to be in compliance with their approved animal waste
management plans and regulations governing 'the requirements for
Certified Operators in Charge.
Please respond to this Notice within 30 days of your receipt,
outlining what measures that you will take to correct the above
deficiencies.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call
Mr. Buster Towell at 9919) 571-4700.
Sincerely,
enne c ust r, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
NOD 66\34

Murphy -Brown, LLC
Growers):
Farm Name:
4/9/2009 P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN (o Clo --
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm 11
County: Northampton
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 1000
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
Aquifer Prntartinn SPdjorl
APR Q 9 2009
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. ` 71 rr
1 of 8 1
r`J
r

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.): `Based on site specific data
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
1000
Farrow to Finish
7416.242 gallyr
7,416,242 gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gall r
gallyr
Total 7,416,242 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
Ibs/yr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
1000
Farrow to Finish
12.311 lbs/yr
12,311 lbs/yr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Total 12,311 1 bslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 63.17
Total N Required 1st Year: 18927.6425
Total N Required 2nd Year: 15337.86
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 17,132.75
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 12,311.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (4,821.75)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

�Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil I st Crop Time to istCrop 1$tCrop LbsNjAc Lbs N Total lb
Acreage Type Code _ _Apply_ Yield _Ibs N/Unit Residual lAc Utiliz
3(a) of 8

Reception Area Specifications
Trw:t Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to lstCrop 1stCrop LbsNiAc Lbs N Totallio-s-N
Acreage Type Code Agply Yield _.Ibs N/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
2-nd-Cro-p- Tim-eto 2ndCr*p 2ndCrop--Lbs-N-/A-c--Ll&iN-T&allbsN���i��
Code Apply Yield lbs N/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
OUR=I
3(b) of 8

Reception Area Specifications 200412010AmendmentforPumpingAgreement-AenvayApplication-Davis
Tract Field Irrigated Sail 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NfAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Arrea e Type Code Apply Yield Ibs N1Unit Residual lAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total Ibs N
Utilized
2384
1
17.3
Gritney
I F
-Au
675.0
0.12
81
1401.3
N
r
45
2.4
108
1868A
189
3269.7
2
13
Grim
F
-Au
675.0
0.12
81
1053
N
r
45
2.4
108
1404
189
2457
3
7.5
Norfolk
F
-Au
875.0
0.12
105
787.5
N
r
60
2.4
1"
1080
249
1867.5
4
19.4
Gritne
F
-Au
675.0
0.12
81
1571.4
N
Sept -Apr
45
2A
108
2095.2
189
3666.6
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
F
-Au
875.0
0.12
105
357
Cover
t r
1
35
35
119
140
476
2
8.7
Norfolk
F
-Au
875.0
0.12
105
913-5
Cover
1
35
35
304.5
140
1218
3
4.06
Norfolk
F
Aar-Aun
875.0
0.12
105
426.3
Cover
1
35
35
142.1
140
568.4
4
4.1
Norfolk
F
-Au
875.0
0.12
105
430.5
Cover
1
35
35
143.5
146
574
5
3.84
Gold
F
-Au
925.0
0.12
ill
426.24
Cover
1
35
35
134.4
146
560.64
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
F
-Au
875.0
0.12
105
1207.5
Cover
1
1
35
35
402.5
140
1610
2
15.6
Norfolk
F
875.0-
0.12
105
1638
Cover
1
35
35
546
140
2184
2384
1
17.3
Gri
D
Feb1
100.0
1.25
125
2162.5
N
45
2.4
108
1868.4
233
4030.9
2
13
Gritne
D
Feb1
100.0
1.25
125
1625
N
45
2.4
108
1404
233
3029
3
7.5
Norfolk
D
Feblfi-June
115.0
1.25
1"
1078A25
N
r
60
2.4
144
1080
287.75
2158.125
4
19.4
Gritn
D
Febl 5-Junel
i00.0
1.25
125
2425
1 N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
2095.2
233
4520.2
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
D
Feb15Jun
115.0
1.25
144
488.75
Cover
Se r
1
35
35
119
178.75
607.75
2
8.7
Norfolk
D
Febl5-Jtrnel
115.0
1.25
144
1250.625
Cover
1
35
35
304.5
178.75
1555.125
3
4A6
Norfolk
D
Febl5-Junal
115.0
1.25
1"
583.625
Cover
1
35
35
142.1
178.75
725.725
4
4.1
Norfolk
D
Febi6Jun
115.0
125
144
589.375
Cover
1
35
35
143.5 1.
178.75
732.875
5
3.84
Goldsboro
D
Feb'15-June
130.0
1.25
163
624
Cover
1
35
35
134.4
197.5
758.4
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
0
FeblS-June
115.0
1.25
144
1653.125
Cover Qop
SeptApr1
35
35
402.5
178.75
2055.625
2
15.6
Norfolk
D
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
1"
2242.5
Cover
1
35
35
546
178.75
2788.5
2384
1
17.3
Gritn
O
Jun -Sept
35.0
4
140
2422
N
SeptApr
45
2A
15
93
1608.9
233
4030.9
2
13
Gitney
O
Jun -Sept
35.0
4
140
1620
N
Sept -Apr
45
2A
15
93
1209
233
3029
3
7.5
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
1260
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
15
129
967.5
297
2227.5
4
19.4
Ghtny
O
Ju
35.0
4
140
2716
N
SeptAor
45
2.4
15
93
1804.2
233
4520.2
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
5711
Cover
SeptApr
1
35
15
20
68
198
639.2
2
8.7
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
1461.6
Cover Cr
Sept -Apr
1
35
15
20
174
188
1635.6
3
4.06
Norfolk
O
Jun
42.0
4
168
682.08
Cover
!
1
35
15
20
81.2
188
763.28
4
4.1
Norfolk
O
Jun
42.0
4
168
688.8
Cover
1
1
35
15
20
82
188
770.8
5
3.84
Goldsboro
0
Jun
45.0
4
180
691.2
Cover
t
1
35
15
20
76A
200
768
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
0
J
42.0
4
168
1932
Cover
!
1
35
15
20
230
188
2162
2
15.6
Norfolk
O
J
42.0
4
168
2620.E
Cover
1
35
15
20
312
188
2932.6
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
0
0
N
t
60
2.4
15
129
438.6
129
438.6
2
8.7
Norfolk
0
0
N
60
2.4
15
129
1122.3
129
1122.3
3
4.06
Norfolk
0
0
N
t r
60
2.4
15
129
523.74
129
523.74
4
4.1
Norfolk
0
0
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
15
129
$28.9
129
528.9
5
3.84
Goldsboro
0
0
N
Sept-AprSept-Apr
2.4
15
141
541.44
141
541.44
581E
1
11.5
Norfolk
0
0
N
Set
60
2.4
15
129
1483.5
129
1483.5
2
15.6
Norfolk
0
0
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
15
129
2012.4
129
2012.4
Totals: 376.4 41800.55 29743.68 71544.23

!Reception Area Specifications 200412010 Amendment for Pumping Agreement - Aerway Application - Davis
Tract Field Irrigated Soil I it Crop Timeto 1stCrop 1stCrop LbsNlAc LbsN TotallbsN�L;Z=
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
M-Mr.1111110r.1
I -To; I Is rinw [MTM�[-� I
MM
�MMMM
„
i����v�*��
� � �
����t�•*�a����©�®®imp
�
�
�
�
��■
ram■■
■■�
�
�
�
��
�■
�■■�
�
�
�
i�.■■R
■■�■■■
�
�
�■■�
■■■wry
��
�
�
��
��
■�■■■
��
�
�■■��
ram■■
■�
�
�
�
�■■�
�
�
�

Reception Area Specifications 200612010 Amendment for Pumping Agreement - Aerway Application - Tayfor
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs N1Ac Lbs N Total lbs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs N1Unit Residual lAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crap 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total lbs N
Code Apply Yield lbs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total lbs N
Utilized
2398
1
7.8
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675A
0.12
61
631.8
CaverCro
Se
1
35
35
273
116
904.8
2
5.1
Gritne
F
Mar -A
675.0
0.12
61
413.1
Cover C.
1
35
35
178.5
116
591.6
3
41.9
Norfolk
F
Mar -A
875.0
0.12
105
4399.5
Coverprop
Se
1
35
35
1466.5
140
5866
2399
1
38.3
Grime
F
Mar-Aug675.0
0.12
81
3102.3
Cover Cro
1
35
35
1340.5
116
4442.8
2
7.1
Gritne
F
Mar -A
675.0
0.12
81
575.1
Cover Crop
Se
1
35
35
248.5
116
823.6
3
1.7
Norfolk
F
Mar A
875.0
0.12
105
178.5
Cover Cro
1
35
35
59.5
140
238
4
3
Norfolk
F
Mar -A
875.0
0.12
105
315
Cover Cro
1
35
1 35
105
1 140
420
5
1
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
81
Cover
1
35
35
35
116
116
6
19.7
Norfolk
F
Mar -A
875.0
0.12
105
2068.5
Cover C
1
35
35
689.5
140
2758
7
10.4
Grime
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
842.4
Cover Crop
5e
1
35
35
364
116
1206.4
B
1.7
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675,0
0.12
81
137.7
Cover
1
35
35
59.5
116
197.2
9
2.3
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
186.3
Cover
1
35
35
80.5
116
266.8
10
19.6
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
1587.6
Cover
1
35
35
686
116
2273.6
2398
1
7.8
GrItnev
O
Feb15-June
100.0
1.25
125
975
N
45
2.4
108
842.4
233
1817.4
2
5.1
Gritne
D
Feb15June
100.0
1.25
125
637.5
N
45
2.4
1 108
550.8
1 233
1188.3
3
41.9
Norfolk
D
Feb15-June
11&0
1.25
143.75
6023.125
N
60
2.4
144
6033.6
287.75
12056.73
2399
1
38.3
Gritney
D
Feb15-June
100.0
1.25
125
4787.5
N
45
2.4
108
4136,4
233
8923.9
2
7.1
Gritney
D
Feb15June
100.0
1.25
125
887.5
N
q?r45
2.4
108
766.8
233
1654.3
3
1.7
Norfolk
D
Feb15June
115.0
1.25
143.75
244.375
N
60
2.4
144
244.8
287.75
489.175
4
3
Norfolk
D
Feb15June
11&0
1.25
143.75
431.25
N
60
2.4
144
432
287.75
863.25
6
19.7
Norfolk
D
Feb15June
115.0
1.25
143.75
2931.875
N
60
2.4
144
2836.8
287.75
5668.675
7
10.4
Gritney
0
Feb15June
100.0
1.25
125
1300
N
%W-Apr
45
2.4
108
1123.2
233
2423.2
8
1.7
G '
D
Feb15June
t00A
1 1.25
1 125
212.5
N
45
2.4
1 108
183.E 1
233
396A
9
2.3
Gritney
0
Feb15June
100.0
1.25
125
287.5
N
45
2.4
108
248.4
233
535.9
10
19.6
GLAM
0
Feb15June
100.0
1.25
125
2450
N
45
2.4
108
2116.E
233
4566.8
2398
1
7.8
GdDM
O
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
1092
0
0
140 1
1092
2
5.1
Gritney
O
35.0
4
140
714
0
0
140
714
3
41.9
Norfolk
O
A
42.0
4
168
7039.2
0
0
168
7039.2
2399
1
38.3
Grltney
O
Apr-Auq
35.0
4
140
5362
0
0
140
5362
2
7.1
Gritney
O
35.0
4
140
994
0
0
140
994
3
1.7
Norfolk
O
A AuQ
42.0
1 4
1 168
285.6
1
0 1
0
16B
285.6
4
3
Norfolk
O
42.0
4
168
504
0
0
168
504
6
19.7
Norfolk
O
Apr -Aug
42.0
4
168
3309.6
0
0
1 168
3309.E
7
10.4
Grime
0
AIX-Auq
35,0
4
140
1456
0
0
140
1456
8
1.7
Gntnev
O
A -A
35.0
4
140
238
0
0
140
238
9
2.3
Gritrra
O
-A
35.0
4
140
322
0
0
140
322
10
19.6
G'
O
A r A
35.0
4
140
2744
0
0
140
2744
Subtract 15 lbs res. N
0
0
from anv crop followi soybeans
0
0
L if
Subtract lbs of N applied to cover
0
0
crop from the foll2wr
crop.
Q
Q
Tofals: 476.8 59647.33 25101.6 84748.93

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 Ibs N 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 Ibs N / ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 Ibs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 Ibs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 Ibs N / ibs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 ton
H
Fescue- Hay
50 Ibs N / ton
Oats
1.3 Ibs N / bushel
J
Rye
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 Ibs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 Ibs N / cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 Ibs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 Ibs N 1 acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT rlanimai Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
1000 Farrow to Finish 4.1 4100
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 4100 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 20500 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 68 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 164 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant _
Type
Crop
in/hr
* inches
125
A
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
B
Norfolk
D
0.5
i
C
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
D
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
E
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
F
Gritney
C
0.5
1
G
Gritney
C
0.5
1
H
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
J
Gritney
C
0.5
1
K
Bonneau
C
0.75
1
125
subl
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub4&7
Gritney
C
0.5
1
sub6
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub8
Bonneau
C
0.75
1
125
3s
Norfolk
D
0.5.
1
6 of 8

Additional Comments:
Subfield acres listed in this plan is the balance of total field acres minus
wet acres. Subfield acreage will be claimed when applyin g with an
aerway machine.
Fields A-E ,Sub 1 M were changed to a corn, wheat, soybean rotation.
The following residuals need to be deducted. 15 Ibs from any crop
following soybeans. All PAN applied {up to 35 Ibs allowed} from any
crop following cover crop.
A cover crop can be planted on row crop fields. Application dates are
September - April at a rate of 35 lbs.
7 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farm 11
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
11we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: M
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: Amy E. Roberson
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Address: 2822 Hwv 24 West. PO Drawer 856
Signature:
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone; [phone]
Date
Date
Date
8of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary; to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3 of 3

Waste Management Plan Changes
Facility �� 3 _ T Farm I r QCioe"I alli,
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
Increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
❑ Other
Comments:
S-\5-0g
Date
1�rj,, MAY 1 7 ?007

Murphy -Brown, LLC 5/15/2007 P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm 11
county: Northam to
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 1000
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of $
l � � MAY 17 2007

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.): "Based on site specific data
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
1000
Farrow to Finish
7416.242 gallyr
7,416,242 gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
gallyr
Total 7,416,242 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (ibs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced eer Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 lbslyr
lbs/yr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 lbslyr
Ibs/yr
1000
Farrow to Finish
12.311 lbslyr
12,311 lbslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 lbslyr
lbslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibs/ r
Ibsl r
Total 12,311 Ibs! r
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 60.74
Total N Required 1st Year: 18264.86
Total N Required 2nd Year: 14929.62
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 16,597.24
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 12,311.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (4,286.24)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil Ist Crop Timeto IstCrop IstCrop LbsN/Ac LbsN TOWI
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs NfUnit Residual IAC UtIlizea
Tim M I
��©■�
=�o�®�a■�®�����©E���■vim®�
3(a) of 8

Reception
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Timato 1$tCrop IstCrop LbsN/Ac Lbs N 7' 1 Mm-N
------- App - ths NlUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
Yield
I
' Code Yield lbsNIUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
Apply
Emu=
■u■■�©�r�o�s�®o�®moo■��om�
,,
�®�
■
������om�s���o��r0�o■���■���o■�¢aOREM
��
�
��
�■�
�
��
■�
�
��
��
�
■ram
�
�■
��
��
��
■�r�
��
��
3(h) of 8

Reception AreaSpecifcations 20"gOl0Ameadme-Mfor Pumping Agreement -AerwayAppltcatfon-Davis
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NlAe Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acrea e Type Code Apply Yield Ibs WUnit Residual fAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Cade Apply Yteid Ibs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
Total
Lbs NIAc
Total Ibs N
Utilized
2384
1
17.3
G6tne
F
A r-Au
675.0
0,12
81
1401.3
N
t• r
45
2.4
100
1868.4
189
3269.7
2
13
Grilna
F
r-Au
675.0
0.12
81
1D53
N
Se - r
45
2.4
108
1404
189
2457
3
7.5
Norfolk
F
Apr -Aug
875.0
0.12
105
787.5
N
Se t- r
60
2.4
144
1080
249
18674
4
19.4
Gritne
F
Apr-Aug675.0
0.12
81
1571.4
N
Se t- r
45
2A
108
2095.2
189
3666.6
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
F
A r-Au
875.0
0.12
105
357
Cover
Se t- r
1
35
35
119
140
476
2
8.7
Norfolk
F
r-Au
875.0
0.12
105
913,5
Cover C
Se t- r
1
35
35
304.5
140
1218
3
4.06
Norfolk
F
r-Au
875.0
0.12
105
426-3
Cover
Se t- r
1
35
35
142.1
140
568.4
4
4.1
Norfolk
F
r-Au
875.0
0.12
105
430.5
Cover C
Se t- r
1
35
35
143.5
140
574
5
3.64
Goldsboro
F
A r-Au
925.0
0.12
111
42624
Cover Gr
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
134.4
146
560.64
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
F
r-Au
875-0
0,12
105
1207,5
Cover Cro
Seat -Apr
1
35
35
402.5
140
1610
2
15.6
Norfolk
F
A r-Au
875.0
0.12
105
1635
Cover Cro
Se I r
1
35
35
546
140
2184
2384
1
17.3
Gritne
D
FebtS-Jun
100.0
1.25
125
2162-5
N
Sept -Apr
45
2A
108
186804
233
4030.9
2
13
Gntne
D
FebtS-Jun
100.0
1.25
125
1626
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
1404
233
3029
3
7.5
Norfolk
D
Feb 15-Ju
115.0
1.25
144
1078.125
N
Se t- r
60
2.4
144
1080
287,75
2158.125
4
19.4
GnIne
1]
Feb15-Jun
1MI)
1.25
125
2425
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
2095.2
233
4520.2
5811
1
34
Norfolk
D
FeblSJun
115.0
1.25
144
488.75
Cover Cro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
119
178-75
607.75
2
8.7
Norfolk
D
Feb15-Jun
115.0
1.25
144
1250.625
Cover Cro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
304,5
178,75
1555.125
3
4.06
Norfolk
D
Feb15-Jun
115A
1.25
144
583.625
Cover Cro
Se t- r
1
35
35
142.1
178.75
725,725
4
4,1
Norfolk
U
Feb15-Jun
115-0
125
144
589,375
Cover Cro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
143.5
178.75
732.875
5
3.84
Goldsboro
D
Feb lSJun
130-4
125
163
624
Cover Cro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
134.4
197.5
758.4
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
D
Feo15-Jun
115.0
125
144
1653.125
Cover Cro
Se t- r
1
35
35
402.5
178.75
2055.625
2
15.6
Norfolk
D
Feb15 Jun
115-0
7.25
144
2242.5
Cover C
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
546
178.75
2788.5
2384
1
17.3
Gnuley
O
Jun -Sept
35.0
4
140
2422
N
Se I- r
45
2.4
15
93
1608.9
233
4030.9
2
13
Gritne
O
Jun -Sept
35.0
4
140
1820
N
Se t- r
45
2.4
15
93
1209
233
3029
3
7.5
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
1260
N
Se t-
60
2.4
15
129
967.5
297
2227.5
4
19A
Gritne
O
Jun -Sept
35.0
4
140
2716
N
t- r
45
2.4
15
93
1B042
233
4520.2
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
O
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
571.2
Cover Cro
Se t- r
1
35
15
20
68
188
639.2
2
8.7
Norfolk
O
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
1461.6
Cover Cr
t r
1
35
15
20
174
188
1635.6
3
4.06
Norfolk
O
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
6B2-08
Cover Cro
Se t- r
1
35
15
20
81.2
188
763.28
4
4.1
Norfolk
0
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
688.8
Cover Crop
SeptApr
1
35
15
20
82
188
770.8
5
3.84
Goldsboro
O
Jun -Set
45-0
4
180
691.2
Cover Cro
Sept -Apr
1
35
15
20
76.8
200
768
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
O
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
1932
Cover Cro
Sew -Apr
1
35
15
20
230
188
2162
2
15.6
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42-0
4
168
2620.8
Cover Cro
Se t- r
1
35
15
20
312
188
2932A
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
0
0
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
15
129
438.E
129
438.6
2
8.7
Norfolk
0
0
N
Se t- r
60
2A
15
129
1122.3
129
1122.3
3
4.06
Norfolk
0
0
N
Sept -Apr
60
2-4
15
129
523.74
129
523.74
a
4.1
Norfolk
0
0
N
Se [- r
60
2.4
15
129
528.9
129
528.9
5
3.84
Goldsboro
0
0
N
Seot-Apr
65
2A
15
141
541A4
141
541.44
SIM
1
11.5
Norfolk
0 1
0
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
15
129
14815
129
1483,5
2
15.6
Norfolk
0
0
N
Seat-Aor
60
2.4
15
129
2012.4
129
2012.4
Totals: 376.4 41800.55 29743.68 71544.23

Reception Area Specifications r 1
Tract Field trrigated Sail ist Crop Thm to IstCrop IstCrop LbsWAc LbsN Tow
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs NJUrtit Residual JAC Utilized
11111111-TV,
��®WYS7'+'+Li0LL1�51��LI
1 1
®-��©4���91Ya�•r.p��.®�-®'
��

Reception Area Specifications 200612010 Amendment for Pumping Agreement - Aerway Application - Taylor
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to lsl Crop 1st Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acrea e Tvoe Code Apply Yield Ibs Nltfnit Residual JAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs N1Ac Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield ibs Nlllnit Residual !Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total Ibs N
Utilized
2398
1
7.8
Grime
F
Mar -Awn
675.0
0.12
81
631.8
Cover Crop
Se t-A r
1
35
35
273
116
904.8
2
5.1
Gritne
F
Mar -A
675.0
0.12
81
413.1
Cover CER
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
178.5
116
591.6
3
41.9
Norfolk
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
105
4399.5
Cover Crop
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
1466.5
140
5866
2399
1
38.3
Gritne
F
Mar -Aug
675.0
0.12
81
3102.3
Cover Crop
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
1340.5
116
4442.8
2
7.1
Gritney
F
fAar-Auq
675.0
0.12
81
575.1
Cover Crop
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
248.5
116
823.6
3
1.7
Norfolk
F
Mar-A
875.0
0.12
105
178.5
Cover Crop
Sept -Apr
t
35
35
59.5
140
238
4
3
1 Norfolk
F
I Mar-A
875.0
1 0.12
105
315
1 Cover Crop
Se t-A r
1
1 35
1 35
105
1 140
420
5
1
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
81
Cover Crop
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
35
116
116
6
19.7
Norfolk
F
Mar-A
875.0
0.12
105
2068.5
Cover Crop
Se -A r
1
35
35
689.5
140
2758
7
10.4
Gdtne
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
MA
Cover Crop
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
364
116
1206A
8
1.7
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
137.7
Cover Cro
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
59.5
116
197.2
9
2.3
Gritne
F
Mar-A
675.0
0.12
81
186.3
Cover Crop
S -A r
1
35
35
80.5
116
266.8
10
19.6
Gritne
F
Mar -Aug
675.0
0.12
81
1587.6
Cover Crop
Sept -Apr
1
35
35
686
116
2273.6
2398
1
7.8
Grime
D
FeW-June
100.0
1.25
125
975
N
I Se -A r
45
2.4
108
842.4
233
1817.4
2
5.1
1 G61nev
D
Feb15-June
100M0
1.25
125
637.5
N
Sept -Apr
45
1 2.4
1 108
550.8
1 233
1188.3
3
41.9
Norfolk
D
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
143.75
6023,125
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
144
6033.6
287.75
12056.73
2399
1
38.3
Grime
D
Feb15-June
100.0
1.25
125
4787.5
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
4136.4
233
8923.9
2
7.1
Gritney
D
Feb15-June
100.0
1.25
125
887.5
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
766.8
233
1654.3
3
1.7
Norfolk
D
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
143.75
244.375
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
244.8
287.75
489.175
4
3
Norfolk
D
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
1 143.75
431.25
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
432
287.75
863.25
6
19.7
Norfolk
D
Feb15-June
115.0
1.25
143.75
2831.875
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
1"
2836.8
287.75
5668.675
7
10.4
Grime
D
Feb15-June
100.0
1.25
125
1300
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
1123.2
233
2423.2
8
1.7
1 Gritney
❑
Fe415-June
100.0
1.25
125
212.5
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
183.6
233
396.1
9
2.3
Gritney
D
Febl5-June
100.0
1 1.25
125
287.5
N
SeptApw
45
2.4
108
248.4
233
535.9
10
19.8
Grib)ey
D
Feb15-Jtrne
100.0
1.25
125
2450
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
2116.8
233
4566.8
2398
1
7.8
Gritne
O
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
1092
0
0
140
1092
2
5.1
Gritne
O
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
714
0
0
140
714
3
41.9
Norfolk
O
Apr -Aug
42.0
4
168
7039.2
0
0
168
7039.2
2399
1
38.3
Grime
O
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
5362
0
0
140
5362
2
7.1
Gritne
O
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
994
0
0
140
994
3
1.7 1
Norfolk
O
1 Aor-Auq
42.0
4
168
285.E
0
0
168
285.6
4
3
Norfolk
O
A r-AuQ
42.0
1 4
198
504
0
0
168
504
6
19.7
Norfolk
O
Apr-AApr-Ayg
42.0
4
168
3309.6
0
0
168
3309.6
7
10.4
Gritne
O
Apr-AApr-Apq
35.0
4
140
1456
0
0 1
140
1456
8
1.7
Gritne
0
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
238
0
0
140
238
9
2.3
Gritne
0
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
322
0
0
140
322
10
19.6
Gdtne
O
Apr -Au
35.0
4
140
27"
0
0
140
2744
Subtract 15 Ibs res. N
0
0
from aqy Crop followi soybeans
0
0
Subtract Ibs of N applied to cover
0
0
Cro from 0* followim crop.
0
0
Totals: 476.8 59647.33 25101.6 84748.93

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc; interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue- Grazed
H Fescue- Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.25 lbs N / bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs N I lbs lint
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.3 lbs N I bushel
2.4 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs. N / acre
50 lbs N / acre
2.5 lbs N / cwt
2.4 lbs N / bushel
4.0 lbs N / bushel
40 Ibs N / acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
1000 Farrow to Finish 4.1 4100
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 4100 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 20500 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 68 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 164 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not.
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
in/hr
inches
125 A
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
B
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
C
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
D
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
E
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
F
Gritney
C
0.5
1
G
Gritney
C
0.5
1
H
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
J
Gritney
C
0.5
1
K
Bonneau
C
0.75
1
125 sub1
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub4&7
Gritney
C
0.5
1
sub6
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub8
Bonneau
C
0.75
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
Subfield acres listed in this plan is the balance of total field acres minus
wet acres. Subfield acreage will be claimed when applying with an
aerway machine.
Fields A-E ,Sub 1M were changed to a corn, wheat, soybean rotation.
7 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farm 11
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owr
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
uate
S-i5-Of
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
Amy E. Roberson
Affiliation:
Murphy-Brown,_LLC
Address:
2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
910 293-3434
Signature: qr�t^ (�-`+ S-�s-0
8of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recieving crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
i Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be -established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3 of 3

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT
Facility Number: 66-34 County:
Facility Name: Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 11
Certified Operator Name: Terry McClintock Operator Number:
ANIMAL FACILITjgS=-:`�- `
Northampton
27441
1. Current liquid ievel(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 11S
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day flans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
`if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility , l
Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 05
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Rz,�-O- r t c) 1 Phone: SC T.
Fa 'lity Owner/Man er (pr' t)
Date: �JO OJT
Facility OwnerlManager (signature)

II. TOTAL
POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25
YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 11S
line m = 1846.8 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 1846.8lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD_
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
11
A
Bermuda
4.31
310.00
1336.1
Mar -Sept
B
Bermuda
4.11
273.50
1124.1
Mar -Sept
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 2460.2 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1846.8 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 2460.2 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -613 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 11S
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.01 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 791281 ftz
e. line c112 x fine d x 7.48 gallons/W 49323 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 3/4/2005
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173019 fl3
i�ft3
103473.61 ft3
689388 gallons
2.50 Ibs11000 gal.
1846.8 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 66-34 County: Northampton
Facility Name: Smithfield- CarrolI's Farm 11
Certified Operator Name: Terry McClintock Operator Number: 27441r j\
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to t�
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid lev
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.s
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5 + -
Lagoon Name/lD: 11S
Spillway(Y or N): N O/
Level(inches): 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
X Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: A [5
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
a � �+� Phone: UDq-.
1PFacility Ow r/Mana er (print)
, �k ,, Date: i
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

a
r
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 11 S
line m = 1846.8 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines1+2+3+4+5+6= 1846.8lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
40A&B
10
SG
4.72
33.13
156A
Sept -Apr
11
SG
5.04
40.65
204.9
Sept -Apr
13
SG
5.35
42.68
228.3
Se t-A r
14
SG
6.38
21.49
137.1
Sept -Apr
1 A
SG
3.27
24.56
80.3
Se t-A r
2A
SG
6.02
24.56
147.9
Sept -Apr
3A
SG
6.02
24.56
147.9
Sept -Apr
313
SG
3.75
24.56
92.1
Sept -Apr
4A
SG
3.51
24.56
86.2
Sept -Apr
46
SG
4.23
23.47
99.3
Sept -Apr
6
SG
5.29
21.46
113.5
Sept -Apr
7
SG
4.85
21.48
104.2
Sept -Apr
8
SG
3.24
19.60
63.5
Se t-A r
9
SG
4.32
33.13
143.1
Sept -Apr
1A & B
Bermuda
7.02
325.00
2281.5
Mar -Sept
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) - 4086.1 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1846.8 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121 /00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 4086.1 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -2239 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility_. _
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
Receiver lagoon is at Facility #66-5 Farm 40A&B. Current level at B lagoon is 28" and farm is fully stocked. PAN
summary reflects crop system at Farm 40&B.
PoA (30 Day) 2121I00

Q
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL_ FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): ills
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 79128 ftz
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/fts 49323 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 1 D00
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated L 3/4/2005
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173019 ft'
® ft3
103473.E ft3
689388 gallons
2.50 lbs11000 gal.
1846.8 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

Murphy -Brown, L.L.0 6/12/2006 P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name -
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm 11
county: Northampton
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 1000
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storaae Structure: Anaerobic L
Storage Period:
Application Method:
>180 days
Irrigation
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
AQIJIFFR'PRnTFr.TinN SECTION
DEC 2 7 2006;
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
�]01A,lQ 1VNOID3� H9131'd�i NIG1
1 of 8 F .
r,► 7nn7 C _ Wr` III
-71

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft5, tons, etc.): *Based on site specific data
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
1000
Farrow to Finish
7416.242 gallyr
7,416,242 gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
gallyr
Total 7,416,242 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced p2r Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
1000
Farrow to Finish
12.311 Ibslyr
12,311 Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibsl r
Ibslyr
Total 12,311 Ibs! r
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 60.74
Total N Required 1st Year: 18264.86
Total N Required 2nd Year: 13484.62
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 15,874.74
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 12,311.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (3,563.74)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

SpecificationsReception Area
Acreage Tract Field Irrigated soil 1 st Crop Time to 1st Crop Ist Crop Lbs N/Ac Lbs N Total lbs N
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crup 2nd Crop Lbs N/Ac LbSN Total lbs N'�gmwm
3(a) of 8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil Ist Crop Time to Ist Crop Ist Crop Lbr. NlAc Lbs N Total lb
�■i
■ter
��■
�■
r�
��
��
��
��
��
��
■��
ter■
��■
��■
��
��
�■■��
��
�■
����������������������■■■ram■■■������
��■■�
3(b) of 8

Reception Area Specifications 2004aO10Amendment for Pumping Agreement -AerwayApplication -Davis
Tract Field Irrigated Sail 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total tbs N
Aceea e Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NIUnft Residual IAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Its N
Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
Total
Lbs MAC
Total Ibs N
utilized
2384
1
17.3
Gritney
Apr-Auq
675.0
0.12
81
1401.3
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
1868.4
199
3269.7
2
13
Gritna
FApr-Aug
675.0
0.12
Al
1053
N
Sept:r
45
2.4
108
1404
189
2457
3
7.5
Norfolk
FApr-Aug
875.0
0.12
105
787.5
N
Sepl-Apr
60
2.4
144
1080
249
1867.5
4
19.4
Gritne
FApr-Aug
675.0
0.12
81
1571.4
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
2095.2
189
3666.6
5$11
1
3.4
Norfolk
F
Apr-Auq
875.0
0.12
105
357
L
Sept-Aor
1
100
100
340
205
697
2
8.7
Norfolk
F
-Au
875.0
0.12
105
913.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
10D
870
205
1783.5
3
4.06
Norfolk
F
Aor-Auo
875.0
0.12
105
426.3
L
SeDt-Apr
1
100
100
406
205
832.3
4
4.1
Norfolk
F
Apr._Aug
875.0
0.12
105
430.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
410
205
840.5
5
3.84
Goldsboro
FApr-Aug
925.0
0.12
111
426.24
1
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
1D0
394
211
810.24
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
FApr-Aug
675.0
0.12
105
1207.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
1150
205
2357.5
2
15.6
Norfolk
FApr-Aug
875.0
0.12
105
1638
L
Sept
t
100
S00
1560
205
3198
2384
1
17.3
Grime
D
Mar -Jul
100.0
1.26
125
2162.5
N
Sept -Apr
45
24
108
1868.4
233
4030.9
2
13
Gritne
❑
MarJui
100.0
1.25
125
1625
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
1404
233
3029
3
7.5
Norfolk
D
MarJul
115.0
1.25
144
1078.125
N
Se t- r
60
2.4
144
1080
287,75
2158,125
4
19.4
Gritne
❑
Mar -Jul
100.0
1.25
125
2425
N
Se t- r
45
2.4
108
2095.2
233
4520.2
5811
1
3A
Norfolk
❑
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
1"
488.75
L
Se t-A r
1
100
100
340
243.75
828.75
2
8.7
Norfolk
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
144
1250.625
L
Se t- r
1
100
100
970
243.75
2120.625
3
4.06
Norfolk
❑
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
144
583.625
L
Se t- r
1
100
100
406
243.75
989.625
4
4.1
Norfolk
D
Mar -Jut
115.0
1.25
144
589.376
L
Se t- r
1
1D0
100
410
24375
999.375
5
3.84
Goldsboro
D
Mar -Jul
130.0
1.25
163
624
L
Se t- r
1
100
100
384
262.5
1608
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
D
Mar -Jul
115A
1.25
144
1653.125
L
Se t• r
1
160
100
1150
243.75
2803,125
2
15.6
Norfolk
0
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
144
22425
L
Se t- r
1
100
100
1560
243.75
3802.5
23$4
1
17.3
Gritne
0
Jun -Set
35.0
4
140
2422
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
15
93
1608.9
233
4030.9
2
13
Gritne
0
Jun -Set
35.0
4
140
1820
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
15
93
1209
233
3029
3
7.5
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
1260
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
15
129
967.5
297
2227.5
4
19.4
Gritne
O
Jun -Sept
35.0
4
140
2716
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
15
93
18042
233
4520.2
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
571.2
L
Seot- r
1
100
15
85
289
253
860.2
2
8.7
Norfolk
0
Jun -Sept t
42.0
4
168
1461.6
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
15
85
739.5
253
2201.1
3
4A6
Norfolk
0
Jun- t
42.0
4
168
682.08
L
Se t- r
1
100
15
85
345.1
253
1027.18
4
4.1
Norfolk
0
Jun-S t
42.0
4
168
688.8
L
Se I -A r
1
100
15
85
348.5
253
103T3
5
3.54
Goldsboro
O
Jun -Sep!
45.0
4
180
691.2
L
Sept -APE
1
100
15
85
326.4
265
1017.E
5910
1
11.5
Norfolk
O
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
1932
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
15
85
977.5
253
2909.5
2
15.6
Norfolk
0
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
2620.8
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
15
85
1326
253
3946.8
5811
1
3.4
Norfolk
0
0
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
15
129
438.6
129
438.6
2
8.7
Norfolk
0
0
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
15
129
1122.3
129
1122.3
3
4.06
Norfolk
0
0
N
Set r
60
2.4
15
129
523.74
129
523.74
4
4.1
Norfolk
0
0
N
Se t- r
60
2A
15
129
528.9
129
528.9
5
3.84
Goldsboro
0
0
N
Se i- r
65
2.4
15
141
541.44
141
541.44
5810
1
11.5
Norfolk
0
0
N
Se t- r
60
2.4
15
129
14835
129
1483.5
2
15.6
Norfolk
0
0
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
15
129
2012.4
129
2012.4
Totals: 376.4 418000.55 39727.68 81528.23

Reception Area Specifications 200612010 Amendment for Pumping Agreement- Aerway Application -Taylor
Tract Field Irrigated Soil ist Crop Time to 1st Crop 1stCrop Lbs N1Ac Lbs N Total lbs N
Acrea e Tvoe Code Aeptv Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield Ibs NfUnit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total Ibs N
Utilized
2398
1
7.8
Gdtney
F
Mar -Aug
675.0
0,12
81
631.8
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
780
181
1411.8
2
5.1
Grttne
F
Mar -Aug
675.0
0.12
81
413.1
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
510
181
3
41.9
Norfolk
F
Mar -A
875.0
0.12
105
4399.5
L
Se -A r
1
100
100
4190
205
'2399
1
38.3
Gritne
F
Mar-Aug675.0
0.12
81
3102.3
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
3830
181
2
7A
Gritne
F
Mar -Aug
675.0
0.12
81
575.1
L
Seat -Apr
1
100
100
710
181
N35
3
1.7
Norfolk
F
Mar A
675.0
0.12
105
178.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
170
205
4
3
Norfolk
F
Mar A
875.0
0.12
105
315
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
300
205
5
1
Grime
F
Mar -A
675.0
0.12
81
81
L
Se t-A r
1
100
100
100
181
6
19.7
Norfolk
F
Mar-Aug875.0
0.12
105
2068.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
1970
205
4038.5
7
10.4
Gritne
F
Mar -Au
675.0
0.12
81
842.4
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
1040
181
1882.4
8
1.7
Gritne
F
Mar -Au
675.0
0.12
81
137.7
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
170
181
307.7
9
2.3
Gritne
F
Mar-Aug675.0
0.12
81
186.3
L
Se t-A r
1
100
100
230
181
416.3
10
19.E
Grit
F
Mar -A
675.0
0.12
81
1587.E
L
Sept -Apr
1
100
100
1960
181
3547.6
2398
1
7.8
GHtne
D
Mar -Jul
100.0
1.25
125
975
N
I Se -A r
45
2.4
108
842.4
233
18174
2
5.1
1 Gritne
D
Mar -Jul
100.0
1.25
125
637.5
N
Sept -Apr
1 45
2.4
1
108
550.B
233
1188.3
3
41.9
Norfolk
❑
I Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
143.75
6023.125
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
1
144
6033.6
287.75
12056.73
2399
1
38.3
Gritne
D
Mar-lul
100.0
1.25
125
4787.5
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
4136.4
233
8923.9
2
7.1
Gritne
D
Mar -Jul
100.0
1.25
125
887.5
N
Se t-A r
45
2.4
108
766.8
233
1654.3
3
1.7
Norfolk
❑
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
143.75
244.375
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
1"
244.8
287.75
489.175
4
3
Norfolk
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
143.75
431.25
N
Se t-A r
60
2.4
144
432
1 287.75
863.25
6
19.7
Norfolk
D
Mar -Jul
115.0
1.25
143.75
2831.875
N
Sept -Apr
60
2.4
144
2836.8
1 287.75
5668.675
7
10.4
Gritne
D
Mar -Jul
100.0
1 1.25
1 125
1300
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
1123.2
233
2423.2
8
1.7
Gritne
D
Mar -Jut
100.0
1.25
125
212.5
N
Se t-A r
1 45
2.4
108
183.6
233
396.1
9
2.3
f Gntne
❑
1 Mar -Jul
100.0
1,25
125
287.5
N
Sept -Apr
1 45
2.4
10B
248.4
233
535.9
10
19.6
Gritney
D
I Mar -Jul
100,0
1.25
125
2450
N
Sept -Apr
45
2.4
108
2116.8
233
4566.8
2398
1
7.8
Gritne
O
Apr-AApr-Auq
35.0
4
140
1092
0
0
140
1092
2
5.1
Gdtnev
O
Apr-AApr-Auq
35.0
4
140
714
0
0
140
714
3
41.9
Norfolk
O
Apr -Aug
42.0
4
168
7039.2
0
0
168
7039.2
2399
1
38.3
Gritne
O
Aar -Aug
35.0
4
140
5362
0 1
0 i
140
5362
2
7.1
Gritne
O
A r-AuQ
35.0 1
4
1
140
994
0
0
140
994
3
17
Norfolk
O
Apr-AApr-Ayg
42.0
4
168
285.6
0
0
168
285.6
4
3
Norfolk
O
A r-Aucl
42.0
4
168
504
0
0
168
504
6
19.7
Norfolk
O
Apr-AApr-Auq
2.0
4
168
3309.6
0
0
168
3309.6
7
10.4
Gritne
OI
Apr -Aug
35.0
4
140
1456
0
0
140
1456
8
1.7
Gritne
O
Apr-AApr-Auq
35.0
4
140
238
0
0
140
238
9
2.3
Gritne
O
A r-A
35.0
4 1
140
322
0
0
140
322
10
19.6
Grime
O
Apr-AApr-Auct
35.0
4
140
2744
0
0
140
27"
Subtract 15 Ibs res. N
1
0
0
from anycroa
followl
sovbeans
0
a
Totals. 476.8 59647.33 35475.6 95122. 33

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand -of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs IN 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
0
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N 1 Ibs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed -
50 lbs N 1 ton
H
Fescue- Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N 1 bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N 1 acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm S ecifications PANT rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
1000 Farrow to Finish 4.1 4100
Wean to Feeder 0,072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 4100 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 20500 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 68 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 164 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions,
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
M11-1

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
inlhr
* inches
A
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
B
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
C
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
D
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
E
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
F
Gritney
C
0.5
1
G
Gritney
C
0.5
1
#REF! H
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
J
Gritney
C
0.5
1
K
Bonneau
C
0.75
1
125 subl
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub4&7
Gritney
C
0.5
1
sub6
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub8
Bonneau
C
0.75
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
Subfield acres listed in this plan is the balance of total field acres minus
wet acres. Subfield acreage will be claimed when applying with an
aerway machine.
Fields A-E ,Sub 1 M were changed to a corn, wheat, soybean rotation.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farm 11
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owr
Signature:
Name of Manager (if
Signature:
b` I Ck— Ub
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
Affiliation:
E. Roberson
Address: 2822 Hwv 24 West. PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 2839E
Telephone: [phone]
Signature: 4� I o(;
Date
8 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recieving crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 to
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients,
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal, Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3 of 3
1

.1.2/16/2009 WED 15:13 FAX [phone]L38-WRLNM1
1& 001 / 0 0 7
r )h-y r­3 4, " rove ll .
Murphy BVOW11 LLC
PO Box 856
2822 Hwy 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Phone, [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax Transmittal Sheet
To;
Yes.,
Phonc: Date:
CC,
......... ....
ClUrgent. For Review L3 Plcasr: Commonf [.1 .111casc Reply 'lease Rocych,

12/1.6/2009 WED 15:15 FAX 91,02933138 WRI,NM1
Z 002/007
PLAN OF ACTION(Paa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 66-34 County: Northampton
Facility Name: Smithfleld••CarrolI's Farm 11
Certified Operator Name: Lee Farmer Operator Number: 28699
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/Ifs:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
lip 11 s 27
N N N
_._.14 T 21 81
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or rnore structures,
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
Y. liquid level is within the 25 ,year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable r•�inge.
X Waste: is to be pumped and hauled to off .,,ite locations. t3olume and PAN contord of waste
to he pumped and hauled is reflected in section Hi tables. InclUded within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a sitr,
not covored in the facilil:0; CAWMP.
_..-._._.._... Operation will ho partially or fully depopulated,
*Attach a compteto schedule with corresponding animal uNts astd dates tro depopul�ltinrl
'if animals are to be moved to another penrritted facility, provide, facility ntrrnber, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the rt.c;eivino facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin farad application of waste: 12/18/2009
I hereby certify that I ('rave reviewed the information listed af>ovo and inctuded within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and agility, the information is
accurate and correct.
R,O, Britt
Pav4ity Owner/Manager (print)
FkitOwr acg ig }
Phone'. 1-804-834-2109
Date: 12/16/2008

12/16/2009 WED 15:16 FAX [phone] WRL.NKI
Q 003/007
111. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL rREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: 11 P
line m T
1780.7 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: 11 S
line m =
1591.2 lb PAN
3. Structure ID: 27
line in =
-4291 Ih PAN
4, Structure Ili:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m
PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 a• 5 + 6 = -919 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAID CANNOT RF APPI_IFD DURING THIS 20 DAY PERIOD_
o. tract 4
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR•
t. TOTAL PAN
u, application window'
2 PAN balance
BALANCE FOR
(Vacre)
HELD (Ibs.)
Column r x s
Wheat y,
4,31
-�.- 128.01
- -5511
_
Sept- Drill _W..
-----A
- B
Wheat
4.11
128.01
526.1
Sept April
Wheat
5.10
128.01
652.9
Sept- APrii
-^ --
-- _-C
D
Wheat
6.22
- 128.01
668.2
_ -
Sept_rApriI
F
Small Grain
4.11
3_1_.37
128.9
Sept -- .aril
G
SrnaI1Grain- --N
1.07
-31.37-_T-
33.6
----,-
Sept• April---
--____.--
-____._
H
Small Grain
--µ
3.12
--_,
22.37
69.8
--�
Sept - April '
I
Small Grain
3.76
33.27
12.5.1
Sept .-A I I
J
Small Grain
2.63
35.00
92:1
Sept ._nprtl.._.__..._._. i
It
Srnall Grain
4.83
35.00
---..
169.1
�..._..._....
Sept - April
_..._.....---
subl
-_...._._
--------- ..- --._
6.2.0
._._._._..........
_._....----.....__._
_._...
_sub 4&7
--
---- G.'l0
__..._r._
..
_._.__..._.._.__..._.
--------•--.�.
6
subG
_..T.-_,..._.._ _..._ . _
_...__._...._..
1.62
_- ___
__
-__
sub
----- -
3.28
Taylor 2398
_ =-3
- - -- _---- -
-� 41.90
--------
- -
-
----
- _ -
----
��
'Slate current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 3017.4 1b. PAPS
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Tbtal PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) - -919 lb, PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121 /00

12/16/2009 WED 15:19 FAX [phone] WRLNMI
I£7.j004/007
x. Crop's remaining PAID balance (line v from section 111) =
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x)
3017.4 lb, PAN
-3936 lb, FLAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance_ If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
Water is being hauled from Farm 8511 to Farm 8527. The route the tanker trucks will be traveling is: Farm
11 - Bethel Church Road, Rt. 186 W, Rt. 301 N. Makin Price Rd. (SR 1201), cross highway 48 on SR 1201, turn
right on Barrow Lane to farm 8527,
More than adequate volume is @ Farm 27 to accomodate the additional water that will be hauled'there.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

12/16/2009 WED 15:20 FAX [phone] WRLNM1
9 005/007
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Narne/ldentifier (ICi):
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr, storm storage & struclural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 1�T 1 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard inchcs
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) - 5.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design _
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 114885 ft2
e, I'rre c/12 x line d X 7.48 gallons/ftu 358058 gallons
3. Projected volurne of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design F— 961days
g. volurne of waste produced according to structural design _ 173019 W
h. current hard # �100t)ii Vertified herd ltl— 1000
actc.Eal waste; produced c,irrent herd „# x line q 173019 ft`i
certified herd d!
i. volume of wash water accordinc) to strc,rti.rral c!c>sic7n
j. oxcess rainfall over evaporation according to design 103473.6 f1
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line fi- 689388 gallons
i, Total PAN to be land applied during draw clown period
1. current waste analysis dated 11123/200� I 1.70 lbs/1000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line 1 = 1780.7 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE,
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

12/16/2009 WED 15:22 FAX [phone] WRLNMI
IM 006/007
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMA, FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL. PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/ldentifier (0); [Ti
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr,/24 hr, storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker [ 21.ojirrehcs
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard L_ 26.0 'snches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 5,0 inches
d'. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) L 79128 ft'
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 246616 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
g p g rg0 days
f. temporarystory e period according to structural desigia
g. volume of waste produced according to Structural design =HEKIRf4'i
h. current herd # 100{) certified herd 4t 1000?
actual waste produced = current herd 11 x line g 173019 ft'i
certified herd
i, volcayie of wash water according to structural design m (JIIt'i
j. e,xcess rainfall over evGlat}ration according to des-igr103473.6�ft'
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 daystline f= 689388 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated I� � 4/7_31200� Fw �T70�1bs/,1000 goal.
rn. ((lines e •+• Ic)/1000) x line 1 = 1591.2 lbs. f-'AN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON Si't -.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

.12/16/2009 WED 15:23 FAX [phone] WRLNM.t
ZOD7/007
PLAN OF ACTION (€'oA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL. FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure NamelIdentifier (ID): 27
2._ Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone)
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
o. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
E— 81.Oinches
19.0 inches
-62 inches
=90424Iftz
3494�86 gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design _ 1 t30 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design L �346031�ft�
h. current hard f 1049�6 certified Nord #E__ 104 66'
actual waste: produced -= current -hard fl. x !ine g = 346031 ft
certified hord 1t n .� . �a•
i. voiurmlr, of wa ln�, ter rtccorciiizg to sirs ctural c1t>. is}n
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.45 x 30 days/line fM
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated r 11 2,31 009
m. ((lines e k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Glick on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00
{G2.G31 ft''
634132 gallons
F-- _1_50IIbs/1000 gal.
-4291 lbs. PAN

ot.WAr�94
r� 7
`? r
0 �
November 5, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.O. Britt, Manager of Farming and Environmental
Murphy -Brown LLC
PO Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Notice of Violation
Murphy -Brown Farm # 11
Permit No. AWS660034
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Britt:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.B. Director
Division of Water Quality
The Raleigh Regional Office is in receipt of a Plan of Action (POA) for the subject facility, dated
October 28, 2004. The POA stated that the secondary lagoon was at 16 inches of freeboard which is less
than the required. Mr. Johnny Hassell had earlier called this in to the Regional Office which satisfies the
reporting requirement stated in your General Permit.
Please note that freeboard violations are violations of your Certificate of Coverage and Permit and can be
subject to civil penalties of up to $ 25,000.00 per day, per violation. Please respond to this Notice in
writing within ten days of your receipt. Your response should include the following information:
1. All land application records from January 1, 2004 to present.
2. Freeboard records from January through the present time.
3. Rainfall records for this time period.
4. A copy of your current Waste Utilization Plan (WUP).
If you have any questions regarding this Notice please call Buster Towel] at [phone].
Sincerely,
S. a Z.
, Supervisor
AquiferProtection Section
Cc: Northampton County Health Department
Ms. Betsy Gerwig--RRODSWC
DWQIAquifer Protection Compliance Unit
RRO-Files .,
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
'!'*I-
�raltuyrarca,
Sa
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-977-623-6748
3900 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Intemet htlpJAt2o.enr.stete.nc.us
An Cmisi nnr^ fimhw16Rirmnfk a drlhn rwmkwnr— fJK Rar%yWhrft Prod r'mwirmr Parwr

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
Facility Name:
Certified Operator Name:
66-34 County: Northampton
Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 11
William Bain Jr.
Operator Number:
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
11P 11S
N N
18 18
2. Check all applicable items
991343
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste Is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 6/4/2014
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information is
accurate and correct.
jomk R.O. Britt
F cili wrier/Manager (print)
(si a
Phone: 1-8 D4-834-2109
Date: 5/1/2014

r A
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: lip
line m =
2587A lb PAN
2.
Structure ID: 11 S
line m =
2243.8 lb PAN
3,
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+8= 4831.2lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT RF APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o, tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x a
u. application window'
D
Grain Sorghum
5.19
105.88
548.5
March -Sept
LP1
Corn
33.65
137.85
4642.0
March -Sept
LP2
Cotton
21.53
74.72
1608.7
March -Sept
zone 1
Bermuda H
4.10
54.37
222.9
March -Sept
zone 2
Bermuda H
3.67
62.17
228.2
March -Sept
zone 3
Bermuda H
3.49
182.08
635.5
Marc; -Sept
zone 4
Bermuda H
3.55
183.65
652.0
March -Sept
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) 8537.7 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 4831.2 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 8537.7 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -3706 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. It line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

0
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Narnelldentifier (ID): ill P
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural Freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line 02 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft'
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
18.0 inches
19.0 inches
1.0 inches
114885 ftZ
71612 gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = ,current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
I. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land appiled during draw down period
I, current waste analysis dated 3/21/2014
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
173019 ft'
ft3
103473.E ft3
6699368 gallons
3.40 lbs11000 gal.
2587.4 lbs. PAN

1
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelidentifier (ID): ills
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 26.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 8.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 79128 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft' 394585 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 100q certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + 1 + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1, current waste analysis dated 3/21 /2014
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121 !OO
173019 ft'
® ft3
103473.E ft3
689368 gallons
2.07 Ibs11000 gal.
2243.8 lbs. PAN

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION — DATE/TIME L
NAME � T,cjo yu 6 n s S REPRESENTING G° e n Cs
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program
obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Appointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 pmon Tuesday Wednesday and
Thursday. Viewing -time ends at 4.45 P.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view
the files to the. extent that time and staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number, as appropriate.
The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is 5 cents for ALL copies, front and back will be 10 cents Per copy. Payment is
to be made by check, money order, or cash in the administrative offices.
4." FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. . To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
Which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
� ME W1.
!]Will
011111111111111111 i • �' AAa '
WAS 2e6AAN 1 1q
ignature and N me of Firm/Business Datd
Please attach a business card to this form If available
n mi _ .1►1�
m
Time In Time Out

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number NCA266034
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit)
NorthHampto
County n Year
Farm 11
2006
Operator in Charge for this Facility Terry McClintock Certification # 27441
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year 0 YES
NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part 11 and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was generated but not
land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application = Fields Pulls in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP): 39 Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
913.94
2. Total number of = Fields Pulls on which land application occurred
during the year: 23 Total Acres on which waste was applied 192.16
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
9,495.00
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and the
permit: 32,221.92
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken off site
during the year:
6. Annual average number of animals by tvpe at this facility during the previous vear:
can to Feede
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to
Farrow to
Farrow to
Wean to
Boar Stud
Gills
Comm,
Total Average
Wean
Feeder
Finish
Finish
Nursery
7
S.
1,000
1,000
Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest NIA
Smallest NIA
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at the
facility is the annual average numbers.)
Facility's Integrator if applicable: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Part II: Facility Status:
MiAR
7
A�lUi�i.i'i ��"��.t .31 i�r''�{i,•� r �li�`i.
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during Dyes Do
the past calendar year.
See Attachment for Explanation

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
❑yes
❑X No
the facility (including the houses, lagoon/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
See Attachment for Explanation
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
[Eyes
[:]No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
Des
[:]No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
Des
❑No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
X❑Yes
❑
7, Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
Des
ENO
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
See Attachment for Explanation
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
Des
ENO
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
Des
[]NO
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar year?
Des
❑No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
X❑tres
[]NO
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
Des
X❑No
the past careendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
See Attachment for Explanation
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
Ekes
❑No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
Des
❑No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
" I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering in
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that
there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations."
Murphy -.Brown, LLC
Permjttee Na and Title X4e or print)
Pe
Sighature of Operator in Charge
(if different from Permittee)
Date
E.7a a
Date

12 13
Ral
As
rr�
w

Murphy -Brown LLC 6 "
Sludge Survey Form ,
Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm or Permit Number: VA 8511
B. Lagoon I.D. Number: '11-P
C. Person taking measurements: Staff
D. Date of Measurements: 2/7/2006
E. Methods/Devices used for measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Disk
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom of the lagoon: Grade Rod
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":NA
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 1.65 acres
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a.. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acres, 1.65 acres x 6 W 10 , with max. of 24.
Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (App. 2).
a. Start Pump Level: 27 Inches
b. Stop Pump Level: 27 inches
c. Current Freeboard Level: 25 inches
I. Distance from the max. liquid level to the the present liquid level: -2 inches
J. Distance from the max, liquid level to the min. liquid level: 0 inches
K. Distance from the present liquid level to the min. liquid level: '0.17 feet
L. Distance from the present liquid level to the lagoon bottom: 12.08 feet
M. Distance from the present liquid level to the top of sludge: 0.33 feet
N. Average thickness of sludge layer: 11.75 feet
O. Thickness of existing Liquid Treatment Zone (M minus K): 0.17 feet
(Note: If O is less than 4 feet, a sludge removal and utilization plan is required
by N,c. DWQ.)
Completed by:
Signature:
Date:
Original: 511104
Retention: 5 years Page 1 of 2

Murphy -Blown LLC
Sludge Survey Form
Appendix 2. Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Facility Name:
Lagoon I.D. Number: 11-P
VA 8511
Grid Point
Distance from liquid surface
Distance from liquid surface
Thickness of
Number
to top of sludge layer ft,
to lagoon bottom ft.
Sludge Layer (ft)
1
1
12.5
11.6
2
1
12.5
11.5
3
1
12
11
4
1
12
11
5
0
12
12
6
0
12
12
7
0
12
12
8
0
12
12
9
D
12
12
10
0
12
12
11
0
12
12
12
0
12
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average 0.33 12.08 11.75
Retention: 5 years - Page 2 of 2 Original: 511104

Annual Stud I!, 9'"3Q°;;,,Re�� Da ha*t rm
...� >~JAAIlA NAME � ���� `r1 DAi! %-6 �
I
FACILITY HUMBER - C _., r_4c--00N I.D.:��r
STAFF GAUQE REAPING ■ \`�
(A)
CI ND taMIT 0
(6) Ir.111111M
JA) WAT99 DaPTH
I,nl r.>� ( j -
D13TANOR RNDN LIQUID
114MACH ` d I )N OF
(a) MINUS (C )
INICKNE43 OF OLUD09
1�
I
14
IT
is
46,
..
,,.,1,,...,..,..
21
—,.
41
._ .....,.,.
I1I�N.Y�1
IIIMI�n 1 Imo•
ReteMon. 5 years i i
Orlatnel'. 511104

Murphy -Brown LLC
Sludge Survey Form
Nppendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm or Permit Number: VA 8511
B. Lagoon I.D. Number:
11-S
C. Person taking measurements: Staff
D. Date of Measurements: 2/7/2006
E, Methods/Devices used for measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer: Disk
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom of the lagoon: Grade Rod
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":NA
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 1.5 acres
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 acres, 1.5 acres x 6 = 9 , with max. of 24.
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (App. 2).
a. Start Pump Level: 32.4 inches
b. Stop Pump Level: 108 inches
c. Current Freeboard Level: Winches
I. Distance from the max. liquid level to the the present liquid level: 47.6 inches
J. Distance from the max. liquid level to the min. liquid level: 75.6 inches
K. Distance from the present liquid level to the min. liquid level: 2.33 feet
L. Distance from the present liquid level to the lagoon bottom: 8.94 feet
M. Distance from the present liquid level to the top of sludge: 7.89 feet
N. Average thickness of sludge layer: 1.06 feet
O. Thickness of existing Liquid Treatment Zone (M minus K): 5.66 feet
(Note: If O is less than 4 feet, a sludge removal and utilization plan is required
by N.C. DWQ.)
Completed by:
i ',ignature:
Date:
Original: 514/04
Retention: 5 years Page 1 of 2

Murphy -Brown LLC
Sludge Survey Form
Appendix 2. Sludge Survey Data Sheet
Facility Name:
Lagoon I.D. Number: 11-S
VA 8511
Grid Point
Distance from liquid surface
Distance from 1i uid surface
Thickness of
Number-
to -to of-slud e-layer ft: --- ..
to -lagoon bottom ft-.-- _-
Slud a La er ft:
1
7
9.5
2.5
2
7
8.5
1.5
3
7
8.5
1.5
4 1
8.5
9
0.5
5
8.5
9
0.5
6
8.5
9
0.5
7
8
9
1
8
8
9
1
9
8.5
9
0.5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Average 7.89 8.94 1.06
Retention: 5 years Page 2 of 2 Original: 511104

JUL-10-2006 02:5a Prl ,
Annual Sludiliv, liOIrroy Da# Seat FRrm
FARM NAME /� ,...� C DA' E
FACILITY NUMOVR,. Q.
STAFF GAUGE ROOM
ww��nNlMlllfa�rr• ,1yp1
(A) (6) MINUS (C )
['"XITANCO MM"' L VID
a KID POWT M (A} WATER VXPY { SURFAC tO ' OP OF TMCKN931 OP 9LUDON
_.... _ . eL ' c
1 aNm.•l'i, H 'al M I Y
a
h [�
1n
71
14
13
a1W,nww•. a1.lA. 1
14
(30)
vuS9-5
IlurrinWlAuluir�l!
Retoollon; 6 yeara '
Drlainal; 611ID4

M
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 66-34 ' County: Northampton
Facility Name: Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 11
Certified Operator Name: Terry McClintock Operator Number: 27441
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 11S
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
X Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
"if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
4 Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 11S
line m =
1846.8 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 1846.8lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
40A&B
10
SG
4.72
33.13
156.4
Sept -Apr
11
SG
5.04
40.65
204.9
Sept -Apr
13
SG
5.35
42.68
228.3
Sept -Apr
14
SG
6.38
21.49
137.1
Se t-A r
1 A
SG
3.27
24.56
80.3
Sept -Apr
2A
SG
6.02
24.56
147.9
Sept -Apr
3A
SG
6.02
24.56
147.9
Sept -Apr
3B
SG
3.75
24.56
92.1
Sept -Apr
4A
SG
3.51
24.56
86.2
Sept -Apr
4B
SG
4.23
23.47
99.3
Se t-A r
6
SG
5.29
21.46
113.5
Sept -Apr
7
SG
4.85
21.48
104.2
Sept -Apr
8
SG
3.24
19.60
63.5
Sept -Apr
9
SG
4.32
33.13
143.1
Sept -Apr
1A & B
Bermuda
7.02
325.00
2281.5
Mar -Sept
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 4086.1 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section li) = 1846.8 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ili:) = 4086.1 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -2239 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
Receiver lagoon is at Facility #66-5 Farm 40A&B. Current level at B lagoon is 28" and farm is fully stocked. PAN
summary reflects crop system at Farm 40&B.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): ills
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.6 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 79128 Jft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 49323 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd #F 1-0-0-0-1 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 1 3/4/2005
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173019 ft'
®W
103473.E ft3
689388 gallons
2.50 Ibs/1000 gal.
1846.8 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

Waste Management Plan Changes
r
Facility 66 - 3 4 Farm
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
❑ Increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
Other
Comments:
30-°�
Date

Murphy -Brown, LLC 06/11 /2003 P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Growers):
Farm Name:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Smithfield Carroll's Farm 11 Amendment
County: Northam ton
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 1000
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

,Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1stCrop Timeto IstCrop 11stCrop LbsNIAc LbSN TotWLbi*
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbsN/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
X
040
3(a) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plant6 are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue - Grazed
H Fescue - Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
1,6 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1,25 lbs N / bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.3 lbs N / bushel
2.4 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N 1 acre
50 lbs N 1 acre
2.5 lbs N / cwt
2.4 lbs N / bushel
4.0 lbs N / bushel
40 lbs N / acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
inthr
inches
subl
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
sub4&7
Gritney
C
0.5
1
sub6
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
sub8
Bonneau
C
0.75
1
#REF!
6 of 8

Additional Comments:
The acreage listed on this amendment is the balance of the total field acreage
minus the wetted acres at this site. The areas not covered by the conventional
irrigation system are being entered into the pumping records as sub fields
so that the acres can be claimed when making application with an Aerway
machine.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm:
Owner:
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Smithfield Carroll's Farm 11 Amendment
Murphy -Brown, LLC
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. Ilwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
Ilwe understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Q_IV63
Name of Technical Specialist: Dawn Williamson
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Address: 2822 Hyj 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:
G -A-o
Date
8 of 8

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LTKMAI
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
MI
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E H N F
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 7, 1997
Adolf Miller
Farm 11
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660034
Farm 11
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Northampton County
Dear Adolf Miller:
In accordance with your application received on June 13, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 66-34, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached). This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Farm 11, located in Northampton County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than 1000 Farrow to Finish and the application to a minimum of 53 acres of land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system, for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
-11"A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Northampton County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT.. REQUESTED
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 11
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
Farm Number: 66-34
Dear Smithfield Carroll's Farms:
May 14, 1997
4 •
You are hereby notified that Farm 11, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has
thirty (30) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with 'Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
fog A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 11
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
,am
[DEHNR
November 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Farm 11
Facility ID#: 66-34
Northampton County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, Nift
� FAX 919-715-�3060
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 �An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 11
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
I Tk?WA
1 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS660034
Farm 11
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Northampton County
Dear Smithfield Carroll's Farms:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on July 7, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Smithfield Carroll's Farms, authorizing the operation
of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Farm 11, located in Northampton County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than 1000 Farrow to Finish and the application to land as specified in
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS660034 dated July 7, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any specific
conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow coverage
under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition 11.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition III.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition III.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations .
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the. number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS660034
Farm 11
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Si erely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc; (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Northampton County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 1 I
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
Dear Smithfield Carroll's Farms:
1 0 •
__MOM
NC,DEN-,,R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTM _N OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATui AX �RESOWRCS '
��1
December 30, 1999 1 ;,j 1I ", /,
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 66=34
Northampton -County
LU,(,',1r, 3
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
411Z�' '.__K 10�
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

�u
U
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
erpl Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
�h�.�r,,follo�w'i g questions have been completed utilizing information on file with atHe
EDase review the information for completeness and make any corrections
whih are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please . i
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.rn
µ
Application Date:
t:a
1. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the followiag required items by signing your initials in the space provided next i?eacli-J
item.
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name: Farm
2. Print Land Owner's name: Smithfield arroll's Farms
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: PO Box 1240
City: Waverly Va Zip: 23890
Telephone Number: 834-2102
4. County where farm is located: Northampton
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): intersection SR,132� and,5R 1329 on the_N.W. comer.
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Aldoph Miller _
7. Lessee's I1(ntegrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): s
66 - 34
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: S¢-34
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Farrow to Finish
1000 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; = no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of P It No. of Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the fa.:_t: No. of Animals,-
7/ vs
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: $ ;Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): 53 ,
4. Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: 010 3V7 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: ; Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains? YES r NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon? YES o NO (please circle one)
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,
(Land Owner's name listed in question I1.2), attest that
this application for (Farm name listed in question ILI)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, /¢Del_Qll 1%44t 44 67oy.. I -lee- —(Manager's name listed in question II.6), attest that this
application for /rfrT/3�/ /) — ��' �-�'S /ie/V � /l (Farm name listed in question II.I)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete. / ., D
Signature Date
THE COMP TED APPLI ATION PACKAGE, INCLUDIN ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2/97)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
(9I0)486-1541
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Date
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]Q
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarnus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
' Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 3 of 3

! 5 T A T E O F �r I r G :t' I A 51
4
r��r ��__��_ yr. _ �•rr•_rr_w __ w rw��_�w_i�__�_ �rr�_ �__�wr� __wr___
' i I� `� � • h •- ram} �_ • H
5
l iY• '• •
• Y JORDA.,S r
u• + iw. : Ilr. .SILL rorD , •J :y' J
• 'ja �• •� mac. w rl.,
LIU
+{ C t Boa ♦ J °tu
,, 8 fl A, -- • r��
rTf
I.• �! - •. +r J1. , � ,Ir/ w'� Jam[. " w
JR
., �, •, ~ iJ lm 3• Law di •, ";' 1WOMY . 17Le.Q ! r au
Af
1nL sue iV
ro.►IocE 4 ti 4; y vwL sae
ML
A „ c
JIUL
rr ./• - 1bl - lul ( 1171 TAYLORS
^
•� \\` MILL POND `
' 5., s, .ula y.J 1= ,1 Slll TI•r.w♦ '_ w. C�,r 1111 •,i:
q 'LIU
e3 y
+S �� GYTLtRp 1lQl
•., il!
WRIDOII ` "` 1 17L 171 /rf
A A
1
0 - ,.>z
� I>a nl
ti
is
1
.YlLL POND • _ J
r �'� : •r ns
Un
IM
A&W RARRO WS / , EDWARDS POCOSIN
C♦I.�. .YELL POND ry • I i191 L
i
LUL
LM
LM
LaIIY 1lLt .-
\//i UM
•
, f
J 11f. � • � 'lr
O C. j U71
C.
T 6—
t b L ' CJrrr LLU faSl
.7
A 1 � l i J• �
Lr
LM
low UIL
a ridiculous appearing, but none the less ef- ' e _
fective, maneuver on the part of the por-
cupine,. for he literally backs into battle,
swinging his tail in advance like a medieval (/
:
mace. .L
In summer, porcupines eat all sorts of leafy
vegetation, and are particularly fond of lily

3w
AD-
rZ
'
iol
�7V
�er
all
i
Ll-
4"Ir
Ap
jAr
fir
A.mp !7d _ -.;A

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Carroll's Foods of Virginia, Inc.
Location: East of Seaboard off of Rte. 1328
Telephone: [phone]
-7
Type Operation: Farrow to Finish
Number of Animals: 1000 sows (Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution a
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce °
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be m'r�
applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potential, cation exchange
capabilities, and available water holding capabilities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied
to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under -OEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. Attached, you will' find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out; meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1000 animals x 10,585 gal (amt.) waste/animal/year = 10,585,000 gal (amt.) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1000 animals x 26 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 26,000 lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech Guide Std. 633)
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) From Secondary Lagoon
_26,000_ lbs. PAN/year x 70% ' = 18,200 lbs. PAN/year.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract #
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Lbs. N
per Ac.
Acres
i Lbs. N
Utilized
Month of
Application
125
1
Norfolk
Berm udagrass/Small Grain
305/50
25.00
8875
Mar -Nov
3
Norfolk
Bermudagrass/Small Grain
305/50
6,66i
2364
Mar -Nov
4
Norfolk
Bermudagrass/Small Grain
305150
8.431
2993
Mar -Nov
6
Norfolk
Bermudagrass/Small Grain
305/50
6.83
2425
Mar -Nov
7
Gritney
Berm udagrass/Small Grain
275/50
6.13
1992
Mar -Nov
8
Bonneau
Berm udagrass/Small Grain
275/50
18.00
5850
Mar -Nov
Total 1 71.051 24499�
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizers
are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [See Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
" See footnote for Table 1.
Table 1
Table 2
Total
Totals from above Tables
Acres
Lbs. N Utilized
71.05
24,499
0
o
71.05
24,499
Amount of N Produced
Surplus or Deficit
18 o
8,299
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. �qq 344".
5Z

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate (In/Hr)
Amount Per
Application
In.
Application
Amount (In.)
1
Norfolk
Bermuda rass/Small Grain
0.5
1.3
8.7
3
Norfolk
Berm udag rass/Small Grain
0.5
1.3
1 8.7
4
Norfolk
Bermuda rass/Small Grain
0.5
1.3
8.7
6
Norfolk
Berm udag rass/Small Grain
0.5
1.3
8.7
7
Gritney
Bermuda rass/Small Grain'.
0.35
1.9
8.0
8
Sonneau
Bermuda rass/Small Grain
0.5
.95
8.0
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation 133.4 ft.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation: This operation is located off of Rte. 1328 east of Seaboard in
Northamoton County. The operation is located on CFSA tract 125. The swine operation is
farrow to finish with a design capacity of 1000 active sows. It is estimated that 10,585,000
gallons of animal waste will be produced annually for land application. There are approximately
71 acres of cropland available for land application. The waste from the swine houses is stored in
a primary and secondary anaerobic treatment lagoon system. The seconds lagoon is used to
further reduce the nitrogen content_ of the waste before it is land applied_ Frequent sampiinp of
our secondary lagoons of similar capacity and geographic location, indicates that nitrogen levels
are reduced an additional 40%. The latest lagoon sample analysis for this farm shows that the
nitrogen content of the secondary lagoon was 47% less than the nitrogen_ content of the primary
lagoon (see attached analyses). The average of 40% reduction was used to determine_ nitrogen
Production for this plan. The waste will be land applied to bermuda rass ha land. During the
fall a small strain will be overseeded into the bermu_dagrass for fall and early spring applications.
Before sludge is applied, samples will be taken to determine its nutrient content. Application
rates for the sludge will be based on the nutrient content of the sludge so that it is agplied at
agronomic rates.

WASTE UTIL[ZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are
subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the
producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life
expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not to exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or an
Alternative Conservation System. (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by the DEM. [See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive
to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no more than
20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may be
reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are
present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned
by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a
discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses. Animal waste may be applied at agronomic rates to grassed waterways that do not
discharge directly into water courses provided the application causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not
be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or
discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible
for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an
illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis
to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Smithfield-Carroll's Farms 11
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. l (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to
be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this
system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil
and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Smithfield-Carmil's Farms, by Adolph Miller. Gene[al Manager
(Please print)
Signature: . �� A�
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date: xi
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print)- Rudy Grammer
Manager of Farming and Environmental Affairs
Affiliation: Carroll's Foods of Virginia, Inc.
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Signature: Date:

i
! S T A T E 0 F I F C\ I A.
'.$ L e- fa.., �' o
f
o � �
INI f Y '1L lL! CJ-.ft LYI
Ck
LM
. fa
In /ONI . I,f. .MILL POND,
LAW
USA S�/
r gl `
tie!
i\ • ~ JJ f LW SIL I'�• 1 •'r SLiOMO UJA
rJN
Tf T .,f Y
1.1 la
} f ...— LA
LM f+ jM f Ld
.r IW !� LN ILl I J
�• iN
Liu
UM
RAMS
LLLL
:'t IM •I LR
••�t , ,YA ri.ORS
fl. LL MI" POND
-
C, ..: y' - ,, ' lJld .J 1L[ ,� LL I
}1.�fr. f. • M,. Crrl Lu .
s UU r ,` G.e.. f. Q LM
l" 1.f
1 r !
ss CwvttlLLlRC J 1AL t• .. '
LNr
^, 11WV xf
V
1 4
Ila
I EOON£S
aft
f ! Ali. • LLL�
Jb A
f w AARROKS EDWARDS POCMM
Cis .MILL POND
• y LLB i
L17. f1Jl. + LIl
V ,
lla 1 • , h.d r
J'LN LU
J
uli
0�. J71 1? is
C'
R CJ,f4__` LLLL fdf\
iLl
'j
.Lto
:at
1
rr-�.• use
4- I II,. ii; 1.L1
a ridiculous appearing, but none the less ef- r t L.
fective, maneuver on the part of the por-
cupine, for he literally backs into battle, O �" *•;.
swinging his tail in advance like a medieval G �'
r
mace. ti
In summer, porcupines eat all sorts of leafy
vegetation, and are particularly fond of lily

1:4
......... . . . . .
zz"

.,f[, �,. -y.. ram:. .•Y. --�%�?1 Li'y' v5 •e:
'r�'�r'� -'�'u• `�'�-�yl ..' r•.�' r, �rur. [ i r .`r�y,ti,. ��w Qr� . �:.. -,^+�„-=�✓.� '�+s`�• � _ � ,,, �rt-
'"7-s'f'� '.. K'.. ^•t + aa'.�;; IM, %a{ � . t .• r T7-t+� ,r, '''.- •�,.-JR• :ti
yam- C' .S ° 1'- •,i
�+ra: • 3 � - � r .0 i`4f7 1 �� • �'�J' 1�•, �' "M �r t f :. + .i "', .�`�['
R-� �' -�i,• r, v� �ME
I a r.��.. .. .rr.. �i.� r S iJi ,ti
ter//�1,_`.FIT
',�� -i��T��F•.+' s�'�:� �Gt".-=. ���'•�
ti'�� a ErL �, ��.',�:. � s; 4„n��bgp� + a' F,p�=i +f�,+.a � ��,x•�� ^i�a' ��ir ►•#,c�'b�'• S.
-^t • ` ; '•'•ti�']�,.�*7�rYi• �' err n y '��f1+l�Y; , �� ".�'4`s"gr�,c'�,ifil"'` \ : '` •�:";..
y ' - . f � �',. py,. y'`rr', ..s ws r•�.-.r a .',•�'h {Y, �j�
`,, •.,,,- �, "� ,fit. � �' �,* :_y-ML
7t9p
!4
crs7/, 1 ? rl'�r, �1 �"r++.�•r � 4 r,j a�":•-�'r`.� ^+, f�'� � f
1.
� i � •r?,- ;tia � Srr",E �A :k,,..v'�,, �. a Hry 7 �-. r i�iP
•" �� �...., ; r C', ,� _ � �fj� ��f-`. y� 'i' > + r �` R'z r�'�_ - ll w �% '1 _ _ �; _
'�"��., W ;�� �~ �•a + � y� �� i.:l k`'!'l'� ��� fir'.. �S. �is j.� .
y14
?" l•' ri �A.�qM"��/! s�' 7 n ,{yl.. ;+• :n •.• a
=�r;:i C.+*S!� � ti'.-_-:.�.r,,.r; �� _��._.y�v.' s: i�` A; n�.:fya:�; x:'�•
EM
��.`v .:� err .'�'•. � %:;.I:1iS'r
r�rc
•i• Y

02/23/96
Smithfield-Carroll's Farms
Lagoon Analyses
Farm 11
Data from North Carolina Department of Agriculture Agronomic Division
Laboratory Results
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Nitrogen
TKN
P
K
N
P2O5
K2O
Reduction
Date Lagoon
m
m
m
Ibs./1000
al, Ibs.H000 al.
lbs./1000 al.
%
Apr-93 11 P
1200
100
600
4.80
1.43
4.50
11 S
700
100
600
2.80
1.43
3.75
41.67
Apr-94 11 P
1700
100
900
6.81
1.43
6.76
11 S
900
100
700
3.60
1.43
5.25
47.14
Apr-95 lip
1700
400
1000
6.81
5.73
7.51
11 S
1000
200
900
4.00
2.86
6.76
41.26
Sep-95 11 P
1064
178
978
4.00
2.40
7.80
11 S
567
169
1045
2.10
2.30
8.40
47.50
Ava.
44.39

Attac.tent
C.zro!in.z A ;c:c!:t1r..! Ex:e�,iiin .C: Of 3
Agri -Waste Ma--n-agement
Biolagica acid Ag-r=Ltumi EnXine_-ing Nartfz C=lima Spatz U-1i.esitu
LTPFS iOCK 7AS ir_ SAIL_? a. ;l7, dLLZ!;:: MAIM rir�L C " _ZQN
OF "I'M a.??=CAlI0l4 &kTZS
James C. Barker*
I. SAIULs COLT =ZQN
A. Semi -Solid Lot va.-==e
i. Scraped directly f_om lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collet= about 2 lbs of aanure from
di=ferenz locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Col ec= about 2 lbs of **ate=tee from under zhe surface cash
avoiding bedding materials and using narsaezall_c collectors.
B . Liquid :ia=ttr a Sl==-
i. Under sloctad-floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" aorm<erallic cordui= over, an back ends into
narure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a th b over end
of cond•..1i=) trapping manure that has entered lower and, remove
and e=zy slu---.7 into plastic buckaz or no=e_allic container.
c. Take subsa les from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. and add about 3/4 pint to non=ecallis sample container.
ii. ExtYr:.ar storage basin or car?c
a. w.aka sure manure has been well muted With a l:quld mazura
c oaae_-ag'_tacor p=p or propeller agitator.
b . Take subsa.=Les f-cm about. 5 pit locac_ors , f==m agitator pump
or :row manure spreader and place in a plastic buckac.
* Pra=essor and Ex=ansion Soeciai'_sc Biological and 3gricul=_ral Engi-neer_ag
Depar.:...ent, Ior=h Carolina State Uni7ersi'r7, Raleigh, NC.

3 -
Attach---ent $
3 0z 3
II . SAI-0 I; PRZ2ARATION AND ' RANS—=
A. Place sample inco an e.-spandabla cantai=er that can be sealed. R =e
residues from container with clean water buc do not use d;sinfect=cs,
soaps, or treat in any Other :ray.
B. Pack sample in ice, retr_3eraza, freeze, or transfer ca lab quickly.
C. hand-del!ver'f is mosc reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect satrple container with pack:ng material suc as
newspaper, box or package wi_h wrappi: g paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. Ali. Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. i;i. P017 zam ?ackers Carp.
76Z1 ?hitepine Road 2320 S. Foszer Avenne
Ric!=, oud, VA 23237 'Wheeling, ITL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
U. Fisher Scientific Co.
3313 cinton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iV..NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, 71 53538 .
Ph: (414)5i3-2446
F. Private analytical' labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Depaw. ant of
Agronoaic Division
P1aat/7asze/S0luti0M Advisar7 Sec_ian
Bli:e Rldge load Center
P.O. Sax Z7647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Pr: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell.
U. Forward $4 along wizh the sample.
iii. Include the following idencificacion infornac_on Jith sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Li-rescack usage (swine-nursary, fi;:is:ziag; rsrkay-breeders,
brooder.hcuse, grower, nuaber flocks grown an lit=ar; etc.)
c. Vaste type (dairy-loc sc_aoed manure, liquid slurry; swipe -pit
s lux
y, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routi:e analyses perforred on all samples: N, P, E, Ca, Leg, Na,
S, Fe, Za, Ca, B
V. Addicional analyses per;o red upon request: DM, Mo, Cd, Ni, Pb

[to]
FROM:
CARROLL'S FOODS
OF VIRGINIA, INC.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
Farm Manager
Rudy Grammer
SUBJECT.
Addition to Waste Utilization Plan
DATE: March 17, 1997
Please find enclosed the Odor/Insect Control Checklist and the i✓tortality
Management Methods Checklist for Farms 1 1, 32, 36, 37, 39, 40, 62, 63, 40A,
and 40B. Please insert the checklist in the three ring binder that contains each
farm's Waste Utilization Plan. If you have any questions, feel free to give Rudy a
call at the main office. Thank you for your assistance.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919 571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM [phone]
SWCD [phone]
NRCS [phone]
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
this facility. The following are some action items you should take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to jhe lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon,
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rules for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks -possible action.
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a.
Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b.
Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
C.
Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property
damage?
d.
Did the spill leave the property?
e.
Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.
Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g.
Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h.
How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a.
Contact company person:
Senior Prod. Mgr.- Jimmy Bridgers H - [phone], W - [phone]
Complex Mgr. - Terry McClintock H - [phone], W - [phone]
Farming Mgr. - Alvin Lane H - [phone], W - [phone]
b.
During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office. Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency number:
919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your name, facility,
telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact
location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under
taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
c.
If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone
Number 919-534-6811.
d.
Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
e.
Contact local SWCD office phone number 919-534-2591, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number 919-534-2591.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a. Contractor's Name: Johnny Sykes
b. Contractor's Address: Conway. NC
c. Contractor's Phone: [phone]
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon and/or Waste Utilization
Plan. (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: Rudy Grammer
b. Phone: [phone]
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan
to keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.

Swine Farm Waste Management odor Conlrol Checklist
Soarer Came 1011's III Alillimite 011111.1. Sill• Spi•ciric Practices
l :trin;l.:nl till IIle prlxhlelillo E l Vrgl l:llil'C of luxxl.d hollers.—
i I Recommeoded best management practices,
f 1 { iotxl jildvillen) alld C0111111011 Sellse
nt1111 al NON sm i"1YCs
• I )il l\' Illilllnl'C-L'l1l'Cltal animals
Ilotir%
I Itkll .sill Dices
• Wo Itiamije-Covefed Anil ass
Illx11.1,
��((I�Ulll'll
lye alcrers 1(willetl over slotled Owls.,
11 Fccdl:rs at high ens! ol•solid Iltws-,
I I SCI3111C onuulrl: huildnp Isom llmis-.
jj1Iriu1cll1ol4 VC11lilatitlil fill' dF)Mg
Handle collccllim [Ills
• 111 ine.
Wric,11 it ILIMMIC remorall by INN. pil Yccharee,
• 1t1111ii11 II11Crulllal CIHRhil5lllllil
or 5'rigv-
venlilalimi
VCllldillltlll C\1Glll%l Iath
• Volatile go%ej,
,yl`,i{3lulerlhstlr
l-l- 1'i111 illailliciallll'e, '
`
Dust
1:-r 61-1cicill all Inoyemelll
Ilklrnll sllflaiCi
• 1hist
aihdill ll liemcell groups of anillials,
I I Feed wh illive],
11 1'ecdcl' covers.,
IWj eu1I de11\ely 11(mospolil exlellder5 111 Teellef
Ct1YCrS
1 11I511 lallks
• Ap1136011 OfTM-Clod lilplxlll
I I Flush lank Covers,
hiplitl Mille 1i1111"arC 11111ng
I 1 1:\ICI111 1111 IilLCi hear 110110111 UI 1tik S 111111
anti -siphon Vellls
I IL"Il illlcli
ngil:IGuu during Kaslt:willcl
I nll.:lIhMl Ilusll %%Aik nollcllltlot 1-C11111alli1111
I'll lcehiugc I)lllnl, • AgIlalloo 111'liecycled laglxlu i I BICnd lccharge line, to 1war lulttonl ok pil-i %%ilh ioui-sillholl vellis
— -----� —� hl will %%bile Ails are filling
l .111 Aar lulls • Agilutiun dm ilig slul,p IanA {J/Sunlp Iank COVOS
_1iIIiI%and tie awdomI
t IUlirdt: t11 i1111 CullOi 11011 • nk,llalllill dillllig WaSIClSalCt I I Ilox utivers
of Imicholl sill\L'] cilllveYf lice

Source
Cruse
BMI's to hlinimicc (hlars SilC S114-01IL' 1'r'll CliM,
—�
I Ild of th;lillpils:.ti ;ll
Agil:uion tilling %%aslck%alel
I I AIclI,I tIischa1PC poil oI piIws III .Icrlte;I I
L_Ikl Nlll
C11111 CN'Ll I Ice
- I:1gooll InI1lid [L:Vcl
I ;IpU4ll1 illl tal'l'i
^�
• Vllfilllle gi15 C1r1155i11n5,
LYI'roper lagtxlll litlithl cilpal'111.
• I1114ogical Illl Xillp:
I I Collect Invotill Slalllip Ilrocetlllres:
• Algllilltolk
� 4nnlntnl ilollatioll Micit pumpltl&;
I Mitlin1u1111tIli".ICC MCi1-I0-1'OIUMC riltio.
I I hicch8nical acratiull-,
1, i� Provull liiulo gicul additives
Illll';lllull SIl11Ill.hl
• I II'.11 I1reSsllre;lgHilltUll:
'1r1ptc till till' ways %xilh little fit lit] Illlltl-,
noiiles
• Wind drill
I I Minilnnul recommended opoaling pressmc.
U-T411111) inliIL-C nrur laglxrll litlnitl and lslcc.
(tr 1 hill r IMill secolld-Slave la'Ixrll
Slulal:c lain, of Ili slit
• l':uliai mirlolli:ll 4lccoulposiliorr,
I I Boilom or mi4llevcl Imidlog.
sullat a
Mixiug while 1111111E:
I I 'I all covel%-.
• Apitalltlll %%Iwil otlplliily.
Ilailll 5illlili'C I11:IIS ill sU11t1S-•
I I I'lovell biohlliull :Ithllllye. UI n\141allls
St'11lYll� 11;15111 54111a1e�
• 1'a111i11 Illlllu111i11 Il4l'nt111R1i1I1011,
I I I:\telttl (110111111I)e (11IIIeIS lilkhrliC11111 lltlukl
• Mixing Mille 1111ing..
level-,
• Agitilltull 1l1101 cillpljilly
I I Remove Seined solids reyilh1h.-
Mauole, Shall of >I11111tc
0 Agilation tlherl spreading,
I I Soil 61je:liorl ot'sluu)/shldges;
splc;ldcl 411111CI1
• Volallic ga.. cllllsiiolis
I I Wash le.sid it lltalltlle Noill spreathr Ate+ thst:
i I'tilrell Ilitllogicill additives or oxi4hnlls
I Inroccictl Inallillt[_
0 Volatile g;LS Ctuissious u111C
^I
I' Soil irliectioll of Alit h/sIlid es
slum t1r AlIdgt: on Iicid
tilling
i 1 Soil incolpolalion lliihin •IN hrs.
smfiices
I I Spicatl in Ihiu unilillnt takes lbr r:+pitl tit-%u]E.
I I Proven Iuolo'Kill atlt1t11ves or IINida1dS
I kiln alliMilk
• Carcass decomposition
'rtlper dislx+sition of Camisics
I )cat! :ulinl:lls C:+reass tlecunllxlsiliun I I COMIliele C11YCl In III Lilll'tlstil'1 ill huri:41 pill,
pies I l 1'1o1x;r lui:dioll/ronslruclion of tlispos:r1lrl> _ — _ — _
Ii i11031t115 • Incomplete conlhuslion I I Secondall. stack Iluluels
2

Inscel Conlrol Cliechlisl for- Animal Operalinns
Stillrlc --' Ca BN11's to Alininlicc Odors
- -
Liquid S}'sl •nls - - - - - - -
III -Nil l4u11c1>
• Acculuul:lliun ol'solids
nsh s1•sluns is desipled and oprraled
tinllirietilll to rentilrc arcornlllalcd solids Ii1IIII
gulle[s as designed.
IV,Wk:IIIOI'C III idging Elf ilcCtlllltilaled solids at
disChel'ge
I -Jrl)(MS i11)J 1'll,
• CIusled So6k.
����
IlyACI1111i1ti1 I:tglkllls, 5011111g Ilil iltls 1111d 11its l4 hele
IA:,I lu��diug is appar�nl In nlinillti�. III,
crnsling of solids to a depth of no mole Ihaii h-
ilkCbeS over more lhan .;11�%a Ill slll I'lace.
1'\i.ilit'4 �1ti�1:I:IIIIC
• I)Ciik)1l1� vcgetillllul
,8
L.r' h'Iinnlatil vegelilli\'e collllol idmig lli I&S III'
1 inlll lh
iagoans and othel lrl pfeveill
`
4 FICCIIIIIIrt:Illoll oI d1:GI)'Illg 1'ibClallYC hallC[
along %%alct 'a edge till ill il)tillild,ilelll•s IICII111CIE:r
-
-
I-cedo S
• I'CCd SIl1I1aL.0
li%I1C11r-11, opClille and Illililll;llll IQed sysIcills ic.N ,
bUlIkeis alit) Ir0llgIIs) Ill liittilmile the
accumulation OfACCOVillg lraslagC.
f1kCfean up spillage tin it iominL basis (c g., 7-I(l
day inlcivill during; stimmo-1 1 -30 dill mit:1Vill
I Col ti1111ilp:
• Accumulations of Iced 1Csithics
t I RetIOCC 1IM.INI C I11C1111111hot IMI It lllllll lllld
M0111111 ill I1IIedl:lle I)er illicla E11 feed slorave
ilfC-a5 b)' Ilhn[illg dfa RlagC :145'a)' Irtinl site
:111d/Ol I11a1V{dlllg i1Ji{Illill4 C0111a111111C111 IC g ,
cOveled Hill ['Ill 1nCN'Cr s b'lllllr Anil Sllllllal 1111111
knlllshllc (:rillli pllktklClsl.
f I IIISI1Ccl lily and reIII(IV C OF break tip uaelmnllatc(I
solids in 1111Cr -illil]S MOUIld feed simagc as
Iteeded,
Silc SpccifiC Pr11C617CS
R outllle Ilya) Of illscclicilic
dill lilt! springlsutiteller
111OIIII IS
Illwluig Its,: of rlxlclllicide
Neill Ioluld

Suu rcc i'aufr
Amnuil I loldn,r.- Alc,1; • WAccunnll:+tiuns O'animal tr:tsles
and fetal %%astage
I)IN fllcuune II'Mill Itnfr a Accimmlalit+nsufaui mil a,wacs
HNII'S. to fllialrttize lhlura
I 1 Hintitlale in+% area, Ihal ball atuisUue M011P
l6ices and olhta liwallous where waslc
accunmlMes and disim Nance by animal, is
nli . ill.
t luilttain I: nce rubes anJ filler alrills arriun+l
:mitrlal holding :ueas to urluinli7e
acclauulaliolls nt' aisles (I e.. inslkwi litr and
rumove or break np act:unullalecl SOWS as
Ileedetl}.
I I k0lhiee spillage oa i+ u+uline ba>is (e b.. -7-111
dap inlcivid thwing sununci, 1 i-ill day ltlietral
dmiug minter) where manure is loaded ['Ili kind
application or disimsal.
i 1 I'Iuvide lire adt;tivatt: drtinagt: around uurnule
clod pif er.
I I Imlk.t Eilt an+l MIUM! nr break ap ucc+Ill) al:+tetl
wasles in filler ships,trtaunl s1twLpiles marl
11Y.ttnllu hautllilil• iueas as uCCkIC&
Sirc Sl+ecific I'ruclicel

Mortality Management Methods
(check which mcthod(s) are being implemented)
u Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The
burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream of public body of water.
cJ%Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. I05-158.7.
Complete incineration.
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
Department of Agriculture.
C Any method which is in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian woWd make possible the
salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written
approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached).

6 . .
THIS DESIGN IS FOR A TWO -STAGE LAGOON
Carrolls 11
Permanent set at 99.0 primary, and 92.0 secondary
CLIENTS NAME _______________________________> Carrolls 11
COUNTY _____________________________________> Northampton
TODAYS DATE ________________________________> 7/3/96
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE 2000 FEET
NUMBER OF PIGS WEAKLING TO FEEDER0
NUMBER OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH0
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING=____---__> 0
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER=------=--==7 0
NUMBER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH =___________> 1000
DEGREE OF ODOR CONTROL1.0
(minimum 1.0 cu. ft. per lb sslw)
(maximum 3.0 cu. ft. per lb sslw)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 12.9
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
FIRST STAGE SIDESLOPES=_��----------------->
FIRST STAGE FREEBOARD
Permanent Volume Required 1417000.0
Permanent Volume Provided 1235697.7
First Stage Top of Dam Elevation
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top
Length = 345.0 feet Width =
0.0 YEARS
341.0
FEET
329.0
FEET
99.0
FEET
86.1
FEET
feet
2.0.1
1.0 FEET
cubic feet
cubic feet
117 72-0
add 382,393 from 2nd
100.0 feet
of Dam
333.0 feet
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL
LENGTH AT TOP OF ALL TEMPORARY STORAGE
WIDTH AT TOP OF ALL TEMPORARY STORAGE
TEMPORARY STORAGE LIQUID SURFACE ELEV.
SECOND STAGE BOTTOM ELEVATION
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION
Depth of Temporary Storage = 6.0
SECOND STAGE SIDESLOPES
SECOND STAGE FREEBOARD
Temporary Storage Required 384817.2
Temporary Storage Provided 422256.0
Second Stage Top of Dam Elevation
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top
Length = 252.0 feet Width
Begin Pumping Elevation is
Stop Pumping Elevation is
Volume to be pumped =
0 SQUARE FEET
90
DAYS
0
GALLONS
6.4
INCHES
6.7
INCHES
248.0 FEET �� O Z 310.0 FEET
98.0 FEET
92.0 FEET
86.0 FEET
feet
2.0:1
1.0 FEET
cubic feet
cubic feet
99.0 feet
of Dam
314.0 feet
96.3 feet
92.0 feet
276493 cubic feet

1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0
head
weanling-to-feeder
x 30 lbs. =
0
lbs.
0
head
feeder -to -finish x
135 lbs. =
0
lbs.
0
sows
farrow-to-weanling
x 433 lbs. =
0
lbs.
0
sows
farrow -to -feeder x
522 lbs. =
0
lbs.
1000
sows
farrow -to -finish x
1417 lbs
1417000
lbs.
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 1417000 lbs.
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF, LAGOON
Design for .1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 1417000.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 99.0 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 86.1 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.9
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH
341.0 329.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb -
289.4 277.4
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm)
315.2 303.2
112189.0 (AREA OF TOP)
80279.6 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
95568.6 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
112189.0 382274.6 80279.6 2.150
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL = 1235697.7 CU. FT.

VOLUME NEEDED
1417000.0 CU. FT.
THE INSIDE EDGE DIMENSIONS OF THE FIRST STAGE AT THE
TOP OF DIKE ELEVATION ARE:
ARE 345.0 FEET BY 333.0 FEET
5. DIKE
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
first stage lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
345.0 333.0 114885 square feet
second stage lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
252.0 314.0 79128 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
TOTAL DA
0 square feet
194013 square feet
100.0 feet.
Pumping cycle to be 90 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 1417000 SSLW * 0.0101481 gallon/lb. SSLW/day
days in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 173019.7 cubic feet
6B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or
volume of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems
that recycle the lagoon water are accounted for in 6A.
W
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 90 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
6C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Volume = 6.4 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 103473.6 cubic feet

9
Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.7 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 108323.9 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 173019.7 cubic feet
6B. 0.0 cubic feet
6C. 103473.6 cubic feet
6D. 108323.9 cubic feet
TOTAL 384817.2 cubic feet
7. SECOND STAGE DESIGN
SS/END1 SS/END2
2.0 2.0
AREA OF TOP (BELOW FREEBOARD)
LENGTH * WIDTH =
248.0 310.0
go
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
224.0 286.0-
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) =
SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2
2.0 2.0
76880.0 (AREA OF TOP)
64064.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
DEPTH
6.0
236.0 298.0 70328.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. _ (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
76880.0 281312.0 64064.0 1.000
VOLUME OF SECOND STAGE BELOW FREEBOARD = 422256.0 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 384817.2 CU. FT.
THE SECOND STAGE FREEBOARD IS = 1.0 FEET
THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE SECOND STAGE AT ELEVATION 99.0 FEET
ARE 252.0 FEET LONG BY 314.0 FEET WIDE
BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 173019.7 cubic feet
6B. 0.0 cubic feet
6C. 103473.6 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME 276493.3 cubic feet
DEPTH OF WASTE = TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME / SURFACE AREA AT
BOTTOM OF SECOND STAGE
DEPTH = 276493.3 CU. FT. / 64064.0 SQ. FT

�JH-19-97 THU 08:45
P. 03
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILLZATIOM PL- AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Smithfield -Carroll'* Farms 11
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specltication and the operation and
malntena"ce procedures eatabtished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. t (we) know that any expansion to the existing design Capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new 'Facilities will require a new certification to
be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (OEM) before the new animals are
stocked- t (we) also understand that there moat be no discharge of animal waste from this
ayatern to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soli
and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility owner: Smitprleid-G{iagil's Farms- by Adolph MlllcL General MAnijoer.
(please print)
Signature: ^
Name of Manager (if different from owner): r.
Signature:
Date:_
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) Rugy Grammer
Manager of Farming and Environmental Affairs
Affiliation: Carmil's Foods of Virginia, Inc.
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 1240
--� Waverly, Virginia 23990
)9c-14lr/ Z-1)- t06 -V
.%W1
Date: , �/- &'

-19-97 THU 08:44
P. 01
dW'-w FAX Transmittal Cover Sheet
carrolt"s cads of 'Virginia/ Inc.
434 East Main St.
(P.O. Box 1240)
Waverly, VirglnIa
USA 23890
Ted: [phone]; Fax (804) 83+3207
,mince __ & - /9 97
711me _ LEA . -
7o -To
-bill, tom/ ice-w+ �rY
# OVaDeS 3 from RMY (9014 -op—
(including dils one)
,Notes
whvr "77C I ZW 77a 77z:#. ei erurfe s r S rGry ar .
�v� tctT�r�3 !ab 3� �� a�S•

�OF W A rFj9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
�0 G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cl)North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 10, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.O. Britt
Murphy -Brown's Farms
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Notice of Violation
Inadequate Freeboard
Farm # 11
COC NC2660034
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Britt:
On January 9, 2007, the Raleigh Regional office became aware that the subject farm
was experiencing inadequate freeboard in both the primary and secondary lagoons. A
Plan of Action (POA) was received via Fax on the same date.
Please note that freeboard violations are violations of your Certificate of Coverage
under NPDES Permit Number NCA200000, and as such may be subject to civil penalties
of up to $ 25,000.00 per day, per violation.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within ten days of your receipt. Your response
should include a plan stating measure to be taken to ensure future compliance with
regards to freeboard levels at this facility. If this facility is still experiencing freeboard
violations at the time of your response, please include an updated POA .
If you have any questions regarding this matter you should call Buster Towell at (919)
791-4200.
Sincerely,
S. Jay Zimmerman, L.G.
Regional Supervisor
Cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. John Hunt, RRO-DSWC
APS CAFO Unit
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
,ne
NotifffiCarolina
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748ww/�IQtu1+ra���
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: http:/A&.ncwaterquality,org f/
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

z —LOT
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
Facility Name:
66-34 County: Northampton
Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 11
Certified Operator Name: Lee Farmer Operator Number: 28699
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways: and from the currant liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Spillway(Y or N),.
Level(Inches):
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
t1P 11S 27
N N N
15 "19 61
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are .:attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic h alance i.s within acceptable range.
X Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
Information. Contact and secure approval from the DVVQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation wilt be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and date* fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving f@Jlity
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 21412012010
..........................
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information fisted above and Included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
R:O. Britt
F y nerlMan- r (pr" f)
acility wa1erlMin ' Ire)
Phone: [phone]
Cate: 214/2010

I
II, TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: 11 P line m = 1658.9 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: 11 S line m = 1758.9 lb PAN
3. Structure ID: 27
4. Structure ID:
5. Structure ID:
6. Structure ID:
line m =
-4291 lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
line m =
Ib PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = -873 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD,
o. tract �#
p. field #
q. Crop
r. 7Cr 5
r, remaining IRR;
2 PAN balance
(Iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs,)
column r x s
,application tivindo n'
A
_ B
Wheat
Wheat
4,31
4,11
T _ 128.01
-- 128.01
551.7
526.1
Sit -April----P _P
Sept April_ ............ _
C
Wheat
5.10
128.01
652A
Sept --Apr I
D
Wheat
5.22
128.01
668.2
Sept - April
F
Small Grain
4.11
31.37
128.9
Sept - April
G
Small Grain
1.07
31.37
33.6
Sept - April
H
Small Grain
3.12
22.37
60.8
Sept - April _
I
Small Grain
3.76
33.27
125.1
Sept - April-
J
Small Grain
2.63
35.00
92.1
Sept -April_____
K
Small Grain --
4,83
35,00
169.1
Se t - Aaril
subs
sub 4&7
6.10
-
sub 6
1.62
sub 8
Taylor 2398
3
_3.28
41.90
_
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period,
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 3017.4 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = -873 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 3017.4 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -3890 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
Water is being hauled from Farm 8511 to Farm 8529, The route the tanker trucks will be traveling is, Farm
11 - Bethel Church Road, Rt. 186 W, Rt. 301 N, Makin Price Rd. (SR 1201), cross highway 48 on SR 1201, turn
right on Barrow Lane to farm 8527,
More than adequate volume is @ Farm 29 to accomodate the additional water that will be hauled there. The
primary lagoon at Farm 29 is at 22" and the Secondary lagoon is at 53".
PoA (30 Day) 2l21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD?
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
I. Structure Name/identifier (0): 11 P
2. Current liquid volurne in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage 8. structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 15.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 4.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 1148 85 ft2
c. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 286447 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design ��µ173U1�J ft�
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x ling; r =
certified herd #
i. voiurne of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 34 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1, current waste analysis dated 11/23/2009
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00
173019 fl,
...._I fri
i O�i�d%3 f t3
689388 gallons
1.70 Ibs/1000 gal.
1658.9 lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (lD): 11 S
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 19.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 26.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 79128 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslff' 345262 gallons
3, Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design t 73U ! 9 {t
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x ling; g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 daysXne f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 11I2312009
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE,
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121100
173019 fV
7 0347;i.0 f 13
689388 gallons
1.70 Ibs/1000 real.
1758,9 lbs. PAN

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I, TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE,
1. Structure Name/Identifier (€0): 27
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 81.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.I24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = -62 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) fJ0424 ft�
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslfC-3494586 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 (jays
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 346T It's
h. current herd # 10496 certified herd #1 10496
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated E- 11l23120 9]
m. ((lines e + k)l1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
346031 ft"
��jl"
1 G -2-6)-3 'd r 1 s
634132 gallons
1.130 Ibs,1000 Taal.
-4291 lbs_ PAN

o�oF W A rFq pG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E, Director
Division of Water Quality
January 10, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R.O. Britt
Murphy -Brown's Farms
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Notice of Violation
Inadequate Freeboard
Farm # 11
COC NC2660034
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Britt:
On January 9, 2007, the Raleigh Regional office became aware that the subject farm
was experiencing inadequate freeboard in both the primary and secondary lagoons. A
Plan of Action (POA) was received via Fax on the same date.
Please note that freeboard violations are violations of your Certificate of Coverage
under NPDES Permit Number NCA200000, and as such may be subject to civil penalties
of up to $ 25,000.00 per day, per violation.
Please respond to this Notice in writin>? within ten days of your receipt. Your response
should include a plan stating measure to be taken to ensure future compliance with
regards to freeboard levels at this facility. If this facility is still experiencing freeboard
violations at the time of your response, please include an updated POA .
If you have any questions regarding this matter you should call Buster Towell at (919)
791-4200.
qely i erman, L.G.
nal Supervisor
Cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. John Hunt, RRO-DS WC
APS CAFO Unit
RRO Files
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
Nc- - Carolina
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 )tu1+Q$
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: http://www.ncwaterquality,org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

01/09/2007 TUE 12:31 FAX [phone] WRLNM1 —4 DWQ Raleigh IM001/006
-13-rowfl.
(Y�
Kut,Oy Bi-own fi,c
PO Box 856
2822 Hwy 24 West
Warsaw, NC 29398
Phone [phone]
Fax (9 t 0) 293-3 t 38
Fax Transmittal Shut
To Fro In:
pacres:
Rhone,• -ate-,
Rer
OUrgent, 0 For Reviow C3 Please CoMment p pleaffoRtPly Q please K00YO18

01/09/2007 TUE 12:32 FAX [phone] WRLNKI ��y DWQ Raleigh
IM 002/006
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
Facility Name:
Certified Operator Name
66-34 County: Northampton
Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 11
Lee Farmer Operator Number: 28699
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level In the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
11P 11S
N N
17 22
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures,
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
`if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 1/10/2007
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
R.O. Britt Phone: [phone]
acil' O nerlMan prin
Date: 1/9/2007
e ng }

01/09/2007 TUE 12:34 FAX [phone] WRINM1 44a DWQ Raleigh U 003/006
IL TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: 11 P
line m =
2997.4 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: 11 S
line m =
1596.0 lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 4593.4 lb PAN
III, TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT RE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r, acres
s. remaining 1RR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
A
Small Grain
4.31
35.66
153.7
Sept - April
B
Small Grain
4.11
35,26
144.9
Sept'April
C
Small Grain
5.10
35.51
181.1
Sept - A ril
D
Small Grain
5,22
35.38
184.7
Sept - April
E
Small Grain
5.28
50.00
264.0
Sept - ril
F
Small Grain
4,11
11.90
48.9
Sept - April
G
Small Grain
1.07
27.63
29.6
Sept - April
H
Small Grain
3.12
27.38
85.4
Sept -April
I
Small Grain
3.76
50.00
188.0
Sept - April
J
Small Grain
2.63
50.00
131.5
Sept - April
K
Small Grain
4.83
50.00
241.5
Sept - A rll
sub/
Small Grain
6.20
35.34
219,1
Sept -April
sub 4&7
Small Grain
6.10
50.00
305.0
Sept - A riI
sub 6
Small Grain
1.62
50.00
8 1. 0
Sept - April
sub 8
Small Grain
3.28
50.00
164.0
Sept - Aphl
Taylor 2398
3
Wheat
41.90
144.00
6033.E
Se t - April
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column Q = 8456.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL, PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 4593.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

01/09/2007 TUE 12:36 FAX [phone] WRLNMI ->-4 DWQ Raleigh
IM 004/006
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill)
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
8456.0 lb. PAN
-3863 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PeA (30 Day) 2121100

01/09/2007 TUE 12:37 FAX [phone] WRLN9f1 -44 DWQ Raleigh
Q 005/006
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR NIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (0): Ill P
2, Current liquid volume'in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 2.0 inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 114885 ft2
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonsW 143223 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design - 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 1 11129/2006
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
173019 fts
ft3
10�3473.6 ft3
689388 gallons
3.60 Ibs/1000 gal.
2997.4 lbs. PAN

01/09/2007 TUE 12:38 FAX [phone] WRL I 444 DWQ Raleigh
Q 006/006
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL_ PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure NamelIdentifier (ID): Ills
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 22.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 26.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 4.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 79128 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 197292 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 173019 ft'
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + 1) x 7.48 x 30 daystline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 11/29/2009
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next.Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
® ft3
103473.E ft3
689388 gallons
1.80 1bs11000 gal.
1596.0 lbs. PAN

Murphy
Box 1A
-Brown ..
Wav 2
Waverly, VA 3894
Waverly Division
January 24, 2007
Mr. S. Jay Zimmerman, L.G.
Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
RE: Inadequate Freeboard
Murphy -Brown LLC Waverly Division
Farm 11 Permit NCA 66-34
JAN 2 6 2007
_. -j
i?I)i_E!0 REjMIIAIL OFHCl.
Mr. Zimmerman
This past year's rainfall has created serious challenges to our operation here at farm 11. The
beginning of 2006 started out rather dry and we were able to take advantage of this. On 6/9/2006 we
recorded freeboard levels of 27 inches in the primary and 136 inches in the secondary lagoon, however
the month of July changed this. By 7/28/2006 we had lost 55 inches of combined freeboard due to
persistent rainfall that month. Most of the precipitation last year fell in the late summer and fall. These
wet conditions prevented safe land application. Murphy -Brown LLC felt that it would be better to retain
the waste in the lagoon during this period of time, rather than apply it to saturated soil.
Murphy -Brown LLC has taken many steps in the past few years to facilitate safe land
application on this farm. For instance there has been 853.2 leased acres added to the Nutrient
Utilization Plan over the past few years. This row crop land typically has waste applications during the
spring and fall. This fall, that process was significantly reduced, and almost completely halted, by the
increased rainfall.
Currently Murphy -Brown LLC is looking for land application opportunities, under the POA, and
we will begin as soon as weather and soil conditions permit us to do so. We, at Murphy -Brown LLC,
remain committed to environmental responsibility, and will continue to work to regain compliant
freeboard levels.
Regards,
�5- Lcv��
R.O. Britt
Land & Nutrient Manager
Murphy -Brown LLC Waverly Division

O1h24/2007 WED 14:20 FAX [phone] WRLNdt1
Z 002/018
•,fir.--- -��,
.��
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES 4�jl I JAN 2 s zap
I OENR RA.LEIGH REGIONAL. OFFI
Facility Number: 66-34 County; Northampton
Facility Name: Smithfield-Carroll's Farm f 1
Certified Operator Name: Lee Farmer Operator Number: 28699
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level In the lagoon to the
---lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon NameflD:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
11P 11S
N N
17 22
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level Is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range,
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan Is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered In the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 1 /10/2007
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information Is
accurate and correct.
R.O. Britt
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Phone: [phone]
Date: 1 /912007

01/:24/2007 WED 14:20 FAX [phone] WRLNMI
Q 003/018
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: 11 P line m : 2997.4 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: 11 S line m = 1596.0 lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5, Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 4593.4 lb PAN
III, TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD_
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window
A
Small Grain
4.31
35.66
153.7
Sept -April
B
Small Grain
4.11
35.26
144.9
Sept - April
C
Small Grain
5.10
35.51
181.1
Sept - April
D
Small Grain
5.22
35.38
184.7
Sept - April
E
Small Grain
5.28
50.00
264.0
Sept- April
F
Small Grain
4.11
11.90
48.9
Se t - A rill
G
Small Grain
1.07
27.63
29.6
Sept - April
H
Small Grain
3.12
27.38
85.4
Sept - A r l
I
Small Grain
3.76
50.00
188.0
Sept - April
J
Small Grain
2.63
50.00
131.5
Sept - April
K
Small Grain
4.83
50.00
241.5
Sept - April
subl
Small Grain
6.20
35.34
219.1
Sept - April
sub 4&7
Small Grain
6.10
50.00
305.0
Sept - April
sub 6
Small Grain
1.62
50.00
81.0
Sept - April
sub 8
Small Grain
3.28
50.00
164.0
Se t - A ril
Taylor 2398
3
Wheat
41.90
144.00
6033.6
Sept - April
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) 8456.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 4593.4 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121 /00

H/
01/`24/2007 WED 14:20 FAX [phone] WRL,NM1
Q 004/018
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ili) w
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x)
8456.0 lb. PAN
•3863 1b, PAN
Line y must show as a deflcit, if line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance, If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide Information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional iand is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

01/.24/2007 WED 14:20 FAX [phone] WRLNMI
Q 005/018
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): 11 P
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 17.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 2.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 114885 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonstft3 143223 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 1 901 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 7-1-0-0-01 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
J. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated I 11/29/2006
m. ({lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173019 fe
0J f t3
103473.6 ft3
689388 gallons
3.60 lbs/1000 gal.
2997.4 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

01424/2007 WED 14:20 FAX [phone] WRL.NM1
[?] 006/018
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure Name/identifier (ID): ills
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 22.0 inches
b, designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 26.0 inches
c. line b - line a (Inches in red zone) = 4.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 79128 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 197292 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g W
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + ] + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 1 11/29/2009
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173019 ft3
0 f t3
103473.E ft3
689388 gallons
1.80 lbs/1000 gal.
1596.0 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

02/05/2007 MON 13:46 FAX [phone] WRLNMI -)—* DWQ Raleigh
Q 001/008
u�°phy�Br0
WIL��
Murphy Brown LLC
110 Box, 856
2822 Hwy 24 West
Warsaw, NC 29398
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax'Transnzittal Sheet
From:.
s Pages-,
Phone,•
e. CC:
OUrgent O For Review O Please Comment C7 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle

0,2/05/2007 MON 13:48 FAX [phone] WRLNMI 4a4 DW9 Raleigh
Q 002/006
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 86-34 County: Northampton
Facility Name: Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 11
Certified Operator Name: Lee Farmer Operator Number: 28699
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID
Splllway(Y or N):
Level(Inches):
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
11p 11S
N N
14 19
2. Check all applicable Items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptabie ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section Ili tables. Included within this plan Is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the IDWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 2/6/2007
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
R.O. Britt
cility Owner/Manager (p
F ity ne g r ( n ure)
Phone: [phone]
Cate: 2/5/2007

0.2/05/2007 MON 13:50 FAX [phone] WRLNMI 444 DWQ Raleigh
IM 003/006
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1, Structure ID: 11 P
line m =
4399.3 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: 11 S
line m =
2172.8 lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 6572.0 115 PAN
Ili. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
a. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column rx 9
u. application window
A
Small Grain
4.31
35.66
153.7
Sept - ARM
B
Small Grain
4.11
35.26
144.9
Sept -April
C
Small Grain
5.10
35.51
181.1
Sept -April
D
Small Grain
5.22
35.38
184.7
Sept - April
E
Small Grain
5.28
50.00
264.0
Sept - April
F
Small Grain
4.11
11.90
48.9
Sept - April
G
Small Grain
1.07
27.63
29.6
Sept - April
H
Small Grain
3.12
27.38
85.4
Sept - April
I
Small Grain
3.76
50.00
188.0
Sept - April
J
Small Grain
2.63
50.00
131.5
Sept - April
K
Small Grain
4.83
50.00
241.5
Sept -April
subl
Small Grain
6.20
35.34
219.1
Sept -A rii
sub 4&7
Small Grain
6.10
50.00
305.0
Sept - A rii
sub 6
Small Grain .
1.62
50,00
81.0
Sept -April
sub 8
Small Grain
3.28
50.00
164.0
Sept -April
Taylor 2398
3
Wheat
41.90
144.00
6033.E
Sept -April
'Stale current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down perlod.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 8456.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = 6572.0 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

0,2/05/2007 MON 13:52 FAX [phone] WRLNMI DWQ Raleigh
ICJ 004/006
x. CroWs remaining PAN balance (line v from section III)
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
8456.0 lb. PAN
-1884 lb. PAN
(Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

0
0.2/05/2007 MON 13:53 FAX [phone] WRLNMI 444 DWQ Raleigh
121005/006
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): Ill P
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
14.0 inches
1-9-01 inches
5.0 inches
11-4-8-851 ftz
358058 gallons
f. temporary storage period according to structural design days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current hg[d # x line g
certified herd #
1. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 1 1/22/2007
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
173019 fts
U ft3
1 Q3473.6 ft3
689388 gallons
4.20 lbs/1000 gal.
4399.3 lbs. PAN

62/05/2007 MON 13:54 FAX [phone] WRLNMl -lad DWQ Raleigh
�l
R 006/006.
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): 1115
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 19.0 Inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr, storm & structural freeboard 26.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 79128 ftz
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 345262 gallons
3. -Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # 7­10-0-01 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 173019 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (fines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 1/22/2007
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I=
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
Oft3
103473.E ft3
689388 gallons
2.10 Ibs/1000 gal.
2172.8 lbs. PAN

! r
•DIY � '� �'.�,yt^�A ,�,'f � ,a; - � �, — r 1. �,.�
,
... .,5 !k?I'°`' •^'=G, •r, - :mil 't;'q."!kl-'(
• a ✓A s
•
Ala - . "!•+ 4 Ic
. 7 ,. —A ✓ .
vi
-as , .r - - i - + e ' v`J'�'r yn•' v.
G
jk
c
]
a N 4 �`.. 4 -,-• jj -. r : '., :.
�4• '. . ,�' .:r .. - _ 'tea � - -
f�
.�'� �^ o ., c: .-� n � r. -eb ^c �4 � Qati�-6"s.h,� c'�,�mm� a »",r•' : -:4Lo-.a•dC• � ,s,. �� ���', e. .. �e '� _ *,�o'�`i - ��s�.:•,r- ��ea' .. o.,q: a-� ` {fi`,+-`.
,.. .N, ., . y,� te�, S'`? r •1'1 .11 �� ><— "7• ..fit :.!
OA
•+n ,a i �ti ei ... - + , Jq
V> A { er•[
• 1 �t } t ,p � .yn i -
ofr�-
i t
94
.. � l ' - ♦ '' e .. �/ Rr '; � 11 Nam...-. '�, • �r n� ��-