660024_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, 'Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
PO Box 517
Jackson NC 27845
Farm Number: 66 - 24
Dear Terry Stauffer:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Piggy Acres Hog Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the,general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application;before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies -of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Stephanie Milam at [phone] extension 544 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
ZSincy,
Pr Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.) :F
Raleigh.Regiortal Office (W/o e6cl.),,:
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone].. FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best.as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Pity Acres Flog Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Terry Stauffer
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 517
City, State: Jackson NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 534-3391
1.4 County where facility is located: Northam
Zip: 27845
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 1 mile South of Jackson on Bryantown Rd. (Hwy.
1 108) on the right side.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 1/1/1979
L9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _66_ (county number); 24 (facility number).
cription 2.2 Operation Des: Swine operation
Fir to Finish
1000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Ayes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 7/7/99 Page 1 of 4 66 - 24

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 15 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 13
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
C4 WMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, .
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 7/7/99 Page 2 of 4 66 - 24

Facility Number: 66 - 24
Facility Name: Piggy Acres Hog Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 7/7/99 Page 3 of 4 66 - 24

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1/98)
Asbcvilk Regional WQ SupaNisar
59 wood in Placo.
AsheviDc, NC 28901
(5zg) 251-6208
Fax (e1gy 251�452
Avwy
Ma.=
Buncombe
Madison
Burk--
McDowell
Caldwell
MitcSeIl
Chavk=
Polk
Oay
Rutberfard
Gmbam
Swain
Haywood
Tra^-syIvania
Hcocl--sea
Yan=y
Jackson
Fayatevillc Regional WQ Suvm-riser
W = ovia Building, Suit--714
Fay--n:viEt. NC 2£ 01.
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anna Moore
Blades Rich=Kmd
C.,,,,,= 4 Robeson
F-&-= Samrson
HokM Scotland
Montgomcy
Wzrszrla-Sal=Regional WQSupervisor
S85 Wanghtown Sz
Winston -Sal= NC 27I07
Ca b� 7714E+00
Fax (33 L) 771-4E31
A]ataanCC Ro:Etgham
Alieghzzy Randolph
A:be Sre=s
Csswzii S=y
David= watanga
Davie Wzikes
Fat:yth Yhcwn
Gmlfad
i�
FORM: Awo-G-E sr.'WS
washingtoo Regional WQ SaD=visor
943 Wrshingtan Squats Mail
Wuhingwn, NC Z7889
(s5Z) 945-6481
Fax (,25.?; 975-3716
B�czrt 3cracs -
Bctie Lrnoir
mown
Pimlico
Cravezi
Patquotmf
Czarimck
Pcquimans
Dare
Fist
Gas=
Tyfrii
Giese
Washington
Hcrzfcrd
Wayne
Hyde
Mom=vMe Regional WQ Sarp=visor
919 North Main Stream
Mooresviilc, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]D40
Alezznd�— Lincoln
Cebmms M=ki=bm-g
Catawba Rowan
Cleveland Stanly
Guinn Union
Iar3-�I
Page 4 of 4
Ral eigb Rcgiousal WQ S apcvi.sas
38M Bs- : Dr.
Rslcigh, NC Z7611
[phone]
Fix (919) 733-7C 72
Chatham Nash
DAaham NM-dL mptoa
Edgcoambe Orange
Fi2nklin PMWM
Granville Vsnco
Halifax wok^
3ohnsma Waz=
Lee Wilson
Wilmington Region WQ Su = isor
127 Car3inal Drive Eztcovon
Wilmington, NC 2g405-3945
[phone]
Fax [phone]M4
Brvrsazck New H=ve:
Csrze ~* Oadow
Columbas Pcode`
Duplin

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
October 9, 2000
10T; 11WI 111131
To: Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor
From: Stephanie Milam, Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Subject: Unclaimed documents
O'W44
The attached application was sent by certified mail and was never claimed by the applicant.
Attached is a copy of the documents for the facility. The Central Office staff would greatly
appreciate it if you would assist us by hand delivering this letter. The envelope has a receipt
attached to it so that someone on site may sign for it verifying that it was received. Please send
this receipt back to us so that we may track the document properly. If you are unable to deliver
this for any reason please send it back to us and let us know the circumstances so we may
proceed with having these documents served to the owners.
We appreciate your cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact me at 733-5083 ext.
544, or ste [e-mail].
�55N -Lr�5o�ti
!c-rry

JUL, 07 ' 95 15: 41
945 Pb2
�zy
NORTH CAROLI.NA DEPARTxE2M OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & NATURAL. RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEEW
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
!I-f a b a A .-/ 2 t.-C X) N r I 5 3 Y-- 531 / Il
7-a,<"P- si,9 FFR-/Z
All questions answered negatively will be discusXed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Psrmittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
$ECTiON I
Animal Operation Type;
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep SLv G
SECTION II
Y I N I COMFITS
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system) ] Li a o
Z. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals cop -fined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the $CS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
obis

%JUL a? '95 15:42
SECTION IIZ
Field Site Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map slue Line Stream?
Z. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a 05GS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
Cffi2TIFICATIO PLAN?
S. is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices? .
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTXFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard. How much? {Approximately 7i
8. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SSCTIOl4 IV
Comments
943 P03
C r ors 4-P7 P►[ J s'P' 19 `If ( lie 7 j�, ,J- -Y�J 0.4- 0 Tr P 1 j
r

1-4
r /rad-/ " 07 � -74-7`4 1,211t44

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
PO Box 517
Jackson NC 27845
Farm Number: 66 - 24
Dear Terry Stauffer:
1 • •
10 %Mow %M0110
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Piggy Acres Hog Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) .days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the.general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Stephanie Milam at [phone] extension 544 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone],
Sinc y,
f.'
�J
J
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, SIC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
7 '

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEN Wr,IiEk QUALITY SECTION TO
RRfJ P. @2i02
Site Requires Immediate A-tennor%,
Facility No. r4
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEkATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: %//� , 1995
Time: 3 a r
Faris Name/Ownerrs 66y 4 U ZS — 7&lz�e y 544pt. F�
Mailing Address: , o r3 o k si '2 v 41 C_
County.-
Integrator- _ _ _--_ _ _ Phone:
On Site Representative: 7'A7r-C N 5 f r4*r rfF&,e, Phone: 49 1 9 - S3 C✓- .7-7 1
Physical Addressa ocation: S !2 -'
Type of Operation: Swine � Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: ,Z j 7N q ` &5,,H ro4 r , , Number of Animals on Site: 1/0 0
DENT Certification Number: ACE DEM Cettification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: `
Longitude: Elevation: -----Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximmateiy 1 Foot + 7 inchesxj�s or No Actual Freeboard: ?L3�t. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes do Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
Is adequate land available for spray? e "or No Is the cover crap adequate or No
Crop(s) being utilized: -e/_ + 7 V F 0AJ'IVI e. LAa„-j
Does the facility meet SCS ndaimum setback criteria! 200 Feet from Dwellings? Q or No
100 Feet from Wells? (�& or No
animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes No
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or( T,
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
-,imila,r mat] -made de -vices? CX& or No If Yes, Please Explain.
' h+Cy lflc facility maintain adequate waste nzanagerncnt records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes r�N
Additional Comments: 746 e 4 - ( ` �-�[�{ A 4+.<—
A CEasl ` -o 6. J 1 -1
&_4 + 41 9-f
it A4 ON- �/��/�++- �h�7(- Me
!'lam U0a/ c/ ei4Y% r/i .7 Y,?/c1 _ A,— -4hPi-W Cr/i•e/�-1 4rwry e^v
Srgndttue
cc: Factltty Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P-02

RE- 2CFdOF COMMUNICATION WITH NC DOA -STATE VETERINARIAN
ivision of Water Quality ❑ Division Of Soil and Water Conservation
Notification of Improper Disposal of Animal Carcasses
Farm Name P` Giyo� C—r Facility ID: —County:i�-or7�
Location: Z 0 Y1 e 0 D V— ►-- r 1 S,7Y, �(n T
Responsible Party / Owner's Name: I Pam✓ r 7 S +#g"" Pr— y✓
Contact Name: S P ►ti., e_ Address: P- d
Phone #: Z L —S3 y `3 City: Itl C Z,G d ry C. Zip: 11 ,3 S,
On Site Representative Notified of Improper Disposal:
Name: 7G7--r v �' T F'F� Phone #: Date I Time:
Response to notification:
Region / District Office: ✓2 V Date/Time Carcasses Discovered:
Inspector's / Reviewer's Name: �C[S �✓_7 e� l / Phone #: l / q "9-71-417y 0 V Y-1 2-Sy
Carcasses discovered as a result of:
Complaint: Inspection: Operational Review: Other:
Animal Type: . ^ Number of Carcasses:lth /6n awe Condition: r 4"q 0279 4:4e i/
Location(s) of Disposal Site: b., 4 4, �,.41,� ^ Zb F' �¢'T r✓�J V�,g
Comments: �'r f8 r I d is CVas qihl
(� 41143 1�0/j -��,g S-(��t ✓�-�s C7�F,c Wou1 � v�sIV � !-r S r4 Al
NC State Veterinarian Contact (Name): Jtj " e S'
Title: Phone : Date/Time:
Other agencies involved/contacted: Name appropriate agency, give contact name, date and time of contact.
cc: Facilities Assessment Group
File
Please send form to:
NC State Veterinarian -Department of Agriculture
Dr. Andy Nlixson, Director of Animal Health
Agricultural Building
1 W. Edenton Street
P.O. Box 26026
Raleigh, NC 27611
phone: [phone] fax: [phone]
Q

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
November 2, 1999
Mr. Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
P.O. Box 517
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
Subject: Notice of Violation
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
Facility # 66-24
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Stauffer:
On October 29, 1999, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office .
conducted a compliance inspection at the subject swine facility. The following
violations of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan were noted:
There were no records available for review during the inspection. After several
attempts to try and conduct the inspection, Mr. Towell informed you via phone
message that he would conduct the inspection on the morning of October 29,
1999, and you were not present at this time.
The Division's records show that your facility does not have a designated
Operator in Charge (01C). Our records also indicate that your name is absent
from the Training and Certification data base as a certified OIC.
Your receiving crop needs improvement. The pasture appeared to be very
sparsely vegetated and may be overgrazed.
Please note that the above violations are violations of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan, and as such are subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per
day per violation.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CiARoLINA 27609
PRONE 919-$71-4700 FAX D 1 O-571-4716
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% R19CYCLKO/10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Terry Stauffer
Page 2
With the receipt of this Notice you are required to respond in waiting within fourteen days of
receipt. Please include with your response copies of any land application records you may have
for 1998 and 1999.
It was noted that this facility has been depopulated for some time. If you do not intend to
repopulate this facility you may consider removing it from the active data base by completing a
removal request form. Please note that as long as your operation maintains its certified status
with the intent of restocking, you are required to have an OIC at this site.
For information on dates of upcoming classes and tests for the Operator In Charge you should
contact your local Cooperative Extension Agent.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice please call Mr. Buster Towell at (919) 571-
4700. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Z'1� I
Kenneth chuste E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
Mr. John White, Northampton County Health Department
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 15, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
PO Box 517
Jackson NC 27845
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
,j
MAY f 9 �f700
Subject: Status Update Wettable Acre
Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 66-24
Northampton County
Dear Terry Stauffer:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is hereby requesting a status update concerning the
completion of a Wettable Acre Determination for your subject facility. A Ietter dated August 27,
1999 was sent to advise you that your facility was required to complete `a Wettable Acre
Determination within six months (see attached letter). As of May 10, 2000 DWQ has not
received the facilities Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form. Please submit to DWQ
within 10 days a written explanation as to why a Wettable Acre Determination Certification Form
has not been submitted. Please include the necessary information detailing the steps taken to
certify this facility for Wettable Acres.
Please be aware that not submitting this certification within the allotted six months may
result in civil penalty assessments, permit revocation, and/or injunctive relief.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County
Ordinance, or permitting requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya Avant
Environmental Engineer
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%o post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
November 2, 1999
Mr. Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
P.O. Box 517
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
Subject: Notice of Violation
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
Facility # 66-24
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Stauffer:
On October 29, 1999, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection at the subject swine facility. The following
violations of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan were noted:
There were no records available for review during the inspection. After several
attempts to try and conduct the inspection, Mr. Towell informed you via phone
message that he would conduct the inspection on the morning of October 29,
1999, and you were not present at this time.
The Division's records show that your facility does not have a designated
Operator in Charge (OIC). Our records also indicate that your name is absent
from the Training and Certification data base as a certified OIC.
Your receiving crop needs improvement. The pasture appeared to be very
sparsely vegetated and may be overgrazed.
Please note that the above violations are violations of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan, and as such are subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per
day per violation.
BBOO BARRSTT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIOH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL. OPPORTUNITY /APPIRMATIV6 ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Terry Stauffer
Page 2
With the receipt of this Notice you are required to respond in_w-riting within fourteen days of
receipt. Please include with your response copies of any land application records you may have
for 1998 and 1999.
It was noted that this facility has been depopulated for some time. If you do not intend to
repopulate this facility you may consider removing it from the active data base by completing a
removal request form. Please note that as long as your operation maintains its certified status
with the intent of restocking, you are required to have an OIC at this site.
For information on dates of upcoming classes and tests for the Operator In Charge you should
contact your local Cooperative Extension Agent.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice please call Mr. Buster Towell at (919) 571-
4700. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
i,-, I
Kenneth chuste E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
Mr. John White, Northampton County Health Department
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

Facility Number Z Date of Inspection i
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm}
© Permitted ertifwed ❑ Conditionally Certified E3 Registered JEJ Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...10` /Jam% -r County: ...
�Q � ��lA^ �.............................
►'-
................................................................................................
Owner Name:...........`..! 7 ,S..f�aw,��er� Phone No:......�Z.............3......�.7.�.. ........... ................................................................. s ... .... �I
Facility Contact: ^S 4'3i e- Title: Phone Na:
........................................................................................................................... ....................
MailingAddress: ................... ... �.......5..�... ......... JR al4s47%q /✓................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative: .................................................... Integrator: ........ KV.. ...............................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:................
Location of Farm:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude D a 0` Longitude
-Design Current j - Desi n Current Design
g g_,
Saline Capacity Population . Poultry: Ca `achy Population Cattle'' Capacity P
r-
❑ We o Feeder
Q-Veeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
`i
a�,; �Number of:Lagoons:�-
Holdih Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Imp cts
tJ gayer IJ "airy „
❑ Non -Layer „ ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other i -
1l' Total Design Capacity
s
ki-
Total SSLW
i;t, ,,; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
i ' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water ofthe State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin'?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 SIRICture 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ................................................ 41.!.......... ......... .......................... ............... ..................... ............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes E51No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes IVo
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
❑ Yes ZNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date nI' Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
02
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Ix
LLN
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes o
12. Crop type com,ka fc"4_
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? es ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
L7' ?Vq yiolatigns;or de#icienf pe were noted dr r`itrtg tbis;visit' Y:ott will receive tia fit>�-tl�er;
:: correst>,oric�ence: a�otit this visit.. ::.: :
❑ Yes ❑ No
21fe'so No
es -No
es (:]No
❑ Yes tVO
❑ Yes
❑ Yes l��No
❑ Y
Yes ❑ N
❑ Yes No
3/23/99

Facility Number: rH — " 1 hale of Inspection (j 2
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes ;No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 5No
❑ Yes o
UIOMAAM

'vi J „ r �'
rM r 5 Division of Soil and.Water Conservation O eration Review i
'r a4 D s JV1 Wslon of Soil and,
WateJ _ Ins er onF
Dii
ioofWater Quality ctirco'.� rn r 3--
`Compliance' Inspection S ',t:4 n�
ix_ T ,t�=
;."� Oth6' Agency Operat on Review
:1�r,r.�..try. .SY+_ h�. L.�: k, .•.l _^.�u:.r+._ar.._sa.=..�. ?:.., 3.n. ._x n::.,.u::i �.,.3.o-k 1. ::b.'. er __ma..::6Iy'.:. .. i.! ': f ..4,i� liU, s: 3 i r,w.l1.�A�,�
Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-upof DW2 ins ection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
OF 4 Date of In5'p
Facility Number telio
Time of Intipecliau Cf ',Q 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[j Permitted 17 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not OperationalDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..... f :.�t.Y............ ) ! ............ roo "!,1.................. .... County: �f .f %1....'�.'7✓......................
.
Owner Name: ...................... ... Phone No
Facility Contact: ................................................................ . Title: Phone No:
MailingAddress: .................................................................................................:.....:................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative:
p ,i.. /l..' ................. .�T t11.....i�.............................. Inte};rotor:. jl! L. � % ld .l,l(1 ..........
Certiffed Operitor:......:.....................................................::.................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of F arti::
Latitude ' ' �4 Longitude ' & 16
Design Current Design Current Design:. _ Current
Capacity Population Poultry' ' lationSwine Capacity Population Cattle :aaci Pa u
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JEI Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity:,
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSL . ,
Number ont ❑ f Ugooris" ' ': ❑ Subsurface Drains PreseLagoori Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System �
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If y(,s, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does di :c`-.arge bypass si lagoon sysicin? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? , ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes/Z No
❑ Yes /FA No
❑ YesrIKo
Z7
© Yes No
❑ Yes A
❑ Yes [ ANO
[I Yes [alNo
Structure 6
. Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...........�..��.......... ........................ ............................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑,F�o
seepage, etc.) //
3/23/99 Continued on back

a �
Facility Number: 6,e — Date of inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed.through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑YesKNO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑rNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ YesNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ffNo
12. Crop type /-�e3 1K -
13,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
�1 o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
P Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Ye
"o
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement? U`Er" L4 GV-B)E3 C-I� io P t A; ji-1G-�}�`I v 6-
❑ Y
;'No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required
17.
Records & Documents
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
4yes
JZNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
2106
19.
Does record keepiing ee i provement? (icl irrigation, freeboard, washy analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not inMMcompltance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
P110
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
2f No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
KNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
V0
0 . iief'icaeticies rare itQteil dirritig {. s,v. sit; • Yoilt All, -t OW 40futthoe
/
comes• oncience.'about this .visit.
Yl-fIAJ6 TD 4ErI'q4))9e7- 13v�� ���GS� �,el des i7>cj� , A.
2� Cidt's l�s r IA) ?�d y P TJ�,r~ 0- �v A ,v `j Q !� T T�qe-yt
ReviewerAnspector Name r �.. � .. ' ic#�. s:1 ��; .. ;tea 33i ii ' ru3 OP t.t. '
ReviewerAnspector Signature. �,� /� ,[ Qj Date 7 2 5
312311x

NORTH C.AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFRICB
NCMNR r
Division of Water Quality
August 19, 1998
JAmzsB.INuNTJ
ry
zyy Mr. Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Swine Farm
b f� P.Q. Box 517
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
;=� WAYhR McOEvITT�`t',;,,,
' $""M'"Jt" Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Piggy Acres Swine Farm
` Facility # 66-24
a Northampton County
Dear Mr. : Stauffer:
On August 4, 1998, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
�;'w .;`• - =; inspection of the subject Swine Farm. The following deficiencies were noted:
Record keeping needs improvement. There were no field records of waste
application to compare p p app p e to the IRE-2 forms that were provided to the inspector.
Also there was no current soil or waste analysis available.
C �• . '' The method of disposal of dead animals was not compliant with the methods
currently accepted by the NCDA State Veterinarian. The Raleigh Regional
Office is required to notify the State Veterinarian when noncompliance is
p observed.
"Ti ' •L �� ;- Please respond in writing within fourteen days of your receipt of this Notice
outlining your plans to correct the above deficiencies. The Raleigh Regional Office
� appreciates your cooperation in correcting these matters. If you have any questions
regarding this Notice please contact Mr. Buster Towell at (919) 5714700.
Sincerely,
-44�
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance Group
3800 BARRE" DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH GAROL.INA 27s0O
PHONE G 1 P-871-4700 FAX D I G-571.4719
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RRCYCLLO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Roirti�re
Da' vis*on of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
of
Facility Number Z
E3 Registered Olcllertified d Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
,q ,
FarmName: ...1". `. .�`.y. .�.'' . r ... ....... .... ....................................................
Owner Name:
Facility Contact: ' �-' Title: ..............I:`::............................................... ...........
Mailing Address: 'd ,.:....0.... 3 a X... sl 7 �!�, ..._ . G
.......... ............................... .................. .
Onsite Representative:...... '"? 5 �'"' �-
Certified Operator ;....... a✓.,' . s � `~�'�'
Location of Farm: l l
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
rr
Date of inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
County:...WI !/,�,
...........;„......
..........................................
.. Phone No: - j
2�. z.. �.:3...y.-..............1.................
....................................... Phone No:...................................................
..............? ..'............................................
Integrator: ...... .�........:':�...............
Operator Certification Number.....
Latitude �• �6 �66 Longitude �• �4 ��6
1.zbl-ws;�
Dsrgnn Curreint��
llesign Current Design Current
Svt+ ne
��
CapacetyE Population Poultry ; 'Capacity
',Population' Caitle Capacity POF
p m
,;,
........
❑ W -to Feeder'
❑Layer
❑Dairy
eeder to Finish
f
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean:
r
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other�<2,9
�.
❑ Farrow to'Finish
r Total Design Capacity n
❑ Gilts
.
❑Boars
Totnl SSLW
Number agoan
oldt�ng Fends
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
❑Spray Feld Area
I.
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
>� �
. :..
..
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at., ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable, setback criteria in -effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes �:�o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑Ye• No

Fieility Number: — Z
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures_(Lagouns.Holding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): .......... ..Q..�...........
❑ Yes L'fNo
❑ Yes 0 o
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type C`.s.0..... 1.....
..,
.................... ....................... I ............
❑ Yes ld"N0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
13• No.violations-ar d6Jrcieitcie's.wt re -noted -during this:visit. Y664'ill receive. -ni 6 ftirili.er
: coI`respondehO about this'visit:• :: .
ElYes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes O
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
es ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [2' o
❑ Yes Jd"No
!LCC.ty- 1'�lj/ ! ^ � rl� J S r , �-�'�. ►1/ 0 C.c..v ✓e�,4—S 0 (�'` hJ "+� %/ S 1 .
✓��,� �s . Mtc .s )�)w s ��►���-�(� burN �N .mod ti�3s •� p� 1 ���
1+,, (`�`�+ ar > v 1= Gam► s. /g,•� . 5' -Tt vd s
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/[nspector Signature: fj,r -wf Date:

r t 1
-'lob REC OF COMMUNICATION WITH NC DOA -STATE VETERINARIAN
Division of Water Quality ❑ Division Of Soil and Water Conservation
Notification of Improper Disposal of Animal Carcasses
Farm Name: P-G 6y C r Ls Facility ID: - Z County: flo r-f lfitH. O t7
Location:
Z 4 ►') e r �] {.[. ►w r i S OV, �L 1-7
Responsible Party / Owner's Name: TPA✓ram S � i9µ ��8-✓
Contact Name: S " Address: h' . d go s/ 7
Phone #: Z L -S 3 q -3 S J t - City: —In Zip: X-I q Ys
On Site Representative Notified of Improper Disposal:
Name: 7Gi-r H S /I n Phone #: Date / Time:
Response to notification:
Region / District Office: P OO Date/Time Carcasses Discovered: 123 6
Inspector's / Reviewer's Name: 61(S � t b r,,le. // Phone #: -7a o
Carcasses discovered as a result of. -
Complaint: Inspection: Operational Review: Other:
Animal Type: ^ e- Number of CarcassesAm K-7 a— Condition: I)A�4 *//`/ d cc 0► 79 C4,91/ ( bu, 44-
�
r�_t 1
Location(s) of Disposal Site: b.� 4 �' L.,41,i , Z f Ib F WQ4t-14, J
Comments: j�� f0 r�''r A L, s C,2Gf1 4 1 CC ass 4-b LY , 3 ("4 kom.
�J4 1,,13 �0 d g S-�e4 r ✓x14-S C7FFj r t 1,-.,o u I J v s. `� I- i s 5 --
NC State Veterinarian Contact (Name): ir)M CZ k
Title: Phone : Date/Time:
Other agencies involved/contacted: Name appropriate agency, give contact name, date and time of contact.
Please send form to:
NC State Veterinarian -Department of Agriculture
Dr. Andy Mixson, Director of Animal Health
Agricultural Building
1 W. Edenton Street
P.O. Box 26026
Raleigh, NC 27611
phone: [phone] fax: [phone]
cc: Facilities Assessment Group
File

S
I
I r� fI 1 l r
♦,/ , � , e ��•� ' ,�� ►ter , �•
C7
l 1? Mai
�, z. —��.

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-ut) of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 11[�[G/ 7 7
Facility Number Ti24 hr. (hh:mm)
Tittle of Inspection
Total Time fin fraction of hours
Farm Status: @Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex.1.25 far l hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:.................................................................................... ............................................................
Farm Name:.....:..11/-�/`Y.................`�..
Owner Name:
Facility.. Contact:............................................................................... Title:.........................
County: .............................................................. .......................
PhoneNo: .......................................................................................
........................................ Phone No:..................................................
MailingAddress:........................................................................................................................................................................ ".:.......... ........ ..........................
✓+.e. r.u.r-- .... -a., r,.-.e .:....-.-...e: I............... ... �..................�......�..•rrw.a•.+.+a{....,.-.... �....- '.. .y .I ..:. ZU.....-•J �..........................�.......... a
Onsite Re resentative:~�� - ~,,GG (,1* S
1 ..... . .....2"N......r............... Integrator:
-.Certified Operator:.:....................................:...............................................................::........ Operaior Certification Number:........... ....................
Location of Farm:
.........................y.......N.....A...........__........T...........................................................__............_............:.................................................................................. ...
AL
..... ....... ..... ... ...: ... .,. .. • .
-� Latitude,' Uingitude-
Type of
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other • _ , . ., .
Non-
] Non -Dairy
Number oof Lagoons I Holding Ponds Subsurface Drains Present ©Lagoon Area > p Spray FieldAY
'._ - sr,i�t ...•-y. . y. J. y;f�F: ,.xrr� ti lZ- .-,:. � r. ,:�• C--. ai. J tXW7�i,.t7�^`�. ,�- fl� fi.. �.«., t Y. -y
!-:
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/irnpro�,ement?' ❑'Yesi`�'No •
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of tfie operation? ` [] Yes` KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ..❑ Spray Field- ❑ Ottier
a. If dischai e is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes. No ,
b. If dischargc is observed, did it reach Surface Water) (It yes notify DWQ) ' LL ❑Yes Ll,Noy
i,..- .. ...ti .. � .. . _,... :....,.:�_.._... -.. _ .. -...: ... . ,-.-:.:. _'.....r. .,... .-.t;:;::.�:...Z.•a.. ,� ....W�i:L, ::;...-ar.a:.ra ,.ie..:.._Z-+�i.�s;.u�=,°«n. y`�i i�.V :`�+.� c6."ii.'..e�r .
~ c.. If discharge is observed, what is the esti►naied flow in gaUm in,
.,:.av d�n�A dr nenui ir' � wu^+., :1' , -.. •j: �� J� � 'r � �.. r' 4i i -�., l ;�r W ti •,r •:
discharge bypass`a lagoon�i6tify i)WQ)y .«r�z siea3.s;; c�a4r`�`°tic
E],Y( No
-."t'iZ�':3ri'".iii..l�:•.�a,,...•-.w•G: _•k}J d':w$l fJ.ZS .l"2}-.•'1 „E:Ml�'i:i%'�f t-snir'�tiRri''�ls ;}yy-`�, A`��}i�.. tW •i k7:1! it .Y'+�5 '��f�a': •Y�'4 s� Xti.y:t a �+-;-':'
rya Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of.tte'operation�❑+YesNo
• .., : � . ' .. '. - ... .,w �t-•'.i., - -. _ • ;. _. � _ � i M1p�..�. { 4 n - '.t'v: �� b�. rsi i'y�. f a `a��': wt.-. j. , •°'-� �,.�,+ . 4
a 4 Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State'ather than from adt'scharge?, M� f t i..9 +„ a Yes Q�Noi; ^3f
,a.... -.e'•. .:.._a.. -_., «..�.,,- .=�... - .,,.q. �... «1i
,
5. Does any'part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require - Yes ❑ No _Y '= ;
maintenance/improvements
4/30/97 , . 1--t...—A,,., r.,.,L-

Vacility Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures ( Lagoons and/or Holdipg Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure [ Structure Structure 3
........ ............................ ?....... ...............................
Structure 4
❑ Yes 10
❑ Ye s d No
❑ Yes�fo
❑ Yes ONo
Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?' ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes Cl No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Yes . ❑•No, • ..
Waste ApRlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? '2s
.r-.._cEt/.euy. .- jnn, .Lr"Y«l..wY ". .. rV"".. ,ewtr ._ _ _... #. ..y r:iHri. +-. wr - n -•. r + r ...+r +n wLJ •x•-3w.♦ a. it'V'.iSwNa?+'1rCr P1�
w (If in excess of WMP,or run f�f7entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) , . •. _. •_ . _�• _ • .� _ _�_ •�• •w •, . _.� r
v 15. CroP.typ �. ..�1...E.�r�`. yt............................................................................................ .......................................................... ................
16'. ' Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?::-f " ❑ Yes ti• No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage far I O.', pplication?. _ _ _. _ _ _ ❑,Yes ,No.�__.- _
18• Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yet : No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? _ ❑ Yes 'No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [--],Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
For CerlChr
ed Facilities On r •w
H. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Ye_s , ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes . ❑ No
- 24. Does record keeping heed improveinent) Yes °' ❑ No
.. ,r_� r 4 . - i.r n�ai?_;. ;�� �. .;�.:-;x�a'.}ys?I..A.wJx r'. Y�' •";..
f }� �•,.. `� �%i»� R r +z •
-, f��i�H�4.,i-�f• F an�pi�€ #�, W[{�rw� ,r ;7
,1L 3g: / n,d a.u/ 'G'C.re..t- `.K nb a///•-•�� T._
`au l�r+ -.7.. r�• ,Fp-- •IN f+�CJ -51.r4 4 T�,t.-
`4
/vl��/V ��NG� �� W�s, , �• E � i �-t�-r t 7rtiiJ:�r.C� t x •.vw.
.97
/b I to ` A : y r
`t'C rr�?c�L. .I -. /'1 L. I'• .. - i.. �wr'r•f ' +R.• �. �.k-.. __'-_�, 4.• i3F .'.+�- �'
tv
' �`�/� " � rV"G�J� ems. � ._. ,k• ti r .✓ _ 4 iu, Y 4,.. a: xw L.» �: �.uwww.,.rwf�r¢•H.v�7 •-•a_
.3" , r`'1�`� y �w t �r� �?+• r f n�� �r� ^��j r
Y ytr (y.✓y Iyf�i i
r .•� ��._ .r s1 r ]�h� ray+}=]raYyX ��, •�`�i;%}�IIQ(��Jj� �. ;'.
'.s.Z;,ieit_s,4w'„i J��f rJ / J' �'1/ (�, ! "'l C.! V 1 4��•.,•- s` `3 M`' - r -� - �.
• �r'tf �J• (;'r F/ Y `/� y i �_ ' <, .�-� e r.� S�,rr aW z `+ C )+� � "fz'in- T
1, r. •} s ,r± r a a ! rir " t� Kkry, y s 3 �,•`# K; u > l3 �'txit5ir+yi,_ xa 4r �y r r�aai 43 ry,{y� i
�.Yfdsrxc .1,_ d;.,�, �cr..r aa•.a�!< ��,' yrr.;jl:r tom•.<�fl.h1
• it r vH. • .+ _ n � ° � .- •
xcUR
a Reviewerllnspector Name' �� ,� ?;N t � x14
Reviewer/InspeclorSignature.-- �D tis`
-
cc: , t7ivis:on of Water Quality, Water Quality Water Uy Assessmen Unit k t' t' •`, 4130/97 ;?

I�
DS Animal '' FeedlotW Operation"'Review..f'H
xp a. 'x 9 1NQ �Animaia Feedloty Operation Site Inspection
6
d = Date -of..'Inspection':,..=;Time
of: Inspection
%aclil ty NumberK
use 24: hr time
Farm Status: Ag ..! tin-' O Com faint [3Follow-u
Farm Name:_.`-. Gres».» ............. ..... _..... _._ _.. County: d r7��lwJ......._......__.......
_
Owner Name: �.. _ -J gr''��Phone No:
Mailing Address:_.....,M......�.. ......_....._.........r.�_.._L......_-_....�. ..y.._ .�....
...... ._.....
Onsite representative: _.-_
Integrator •.._........._....._.............�.�� ...
Certified Operator Name:P'"�r �r_..s�*.. ....._ ...........- .._ ..... _ _W... _ .. _......
Location of Farm:
Latitude '���66 Longitude •
❑ Not O erational Date Last Operated: .......... ............. .......... _...__...._................ .................. _....... ....... W......_....... .........
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge'is �bserved, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes i ,��'1 J%O'
El Yes 0 fVo
❑ Yes Lit No
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ Yes
M .
❑ Yes
El<
❑ Yes
7t1jo
Continued on back

V. 15 ]aL;nuy nvt it] cornpuan[:e rrvnn ally appuk;dUle seluduK cruenar L-i Yes j'j-Hcy—
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes
B. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes
IdNo
Structures (Lagoons and/or Hold-i_ng__PondsZ
9. s strut iural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4-211
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes
i i. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El {G No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes .1« W
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWO)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? es ❑ No
Waste Application f�
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 1�d,Tio/
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWO)
15. Crop type.!..i.�l_............... ........ ........ ............. ............. _..... -...... - ....... ......... _..._ .... _........
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No .
IS. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes O Nbo
19, Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? El Yes
For Certified Facilities - Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Pian readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
z
r
s
a:
4
t
K �
�^ :
Y
F
k'
s
t V*ewer/lnspector
Revewer/Inspector
Signature
"'
'Date
::
,.
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor EDF-=HNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 24, 1997
Mr. Terrry Stauffer
P.O. Box 517
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-24
Piggy Acres Farm
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Stauffer:
On January 15, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
0
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%qf C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

J
Terry Stauffer
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
" Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Pat Hooper, Environmental Engineer,DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

I'
fFacllity'N
umber:
Farm Status:
Date ..of :.;inspection Time of Inspection
Use 24..::hr time
[]-routine ❑ Complaint ❑ Follow-u
Farm Name: ' �..h?..�......0 frLS Count C�.�ht.L.'1.'g .. !.......... ..- ....................
�.... _....................... ................... y : ... ..
.. Q
Owner Name: .......`. .....`..:1i:.Ff-' : . Phone No: (.�.9....'..._. 3 y..-_��5. ,� __.....__
jr .............................................
Mailing Address: � .. �ig �CSJ►-rLI r............ ._ ........ ....... ...........
Onsite representative: n,Q2 '._ .tAh �2'........_................ Integrator: ......... ......... _...
Certified Operator Name: l
-ocation of Farm: s' �.-, % C 5' p L /-� D i= ✓ i9 c/23 -'j
....... —............................................................................_......................................................................._........._..........................................__......................_................-----• {�
Latitude �'�'�" Longitude
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: •- ..... ................... .......... ...... ........ ................ ......... _................. ............. ._...................
...
i ype or Operation and vesign t;apacity
e'.
lVum6r i`Pout Y:'
.y
x Y. Number
Swines
Wean to Feeder Laver 10 Dairy
weeder to Finish IQ Von Laver Beef
Farrg2j to Wean
to Feeder R
Z.
r
t0 Farrow to Finish ❑Other Type of Livestock
<.,�_E
I
,,w„'�...��` .- � `�.3?�:?�k" av .:LfKK �-��'. k,.,�s. �'.' ^s, �.>aeF; �.y».:';�.
Numberof lagoons 1xHoidingPonds 1� ❑Subsurface Dratns Present€<
Al
x ' Fta"f x r ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray . Fie[d Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was 'the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes W r`
❑ Yes
❑ Yes d�t -
❑ Yes �No
f
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Zo
❑ Yes 7No
Continued on back

y. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in respurisiuie t.;aiaiyc k, �,��...
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
f
Structures La cons and/or Holding...Ponds
r
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lago 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
................�.................. ...........I........11.....................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWO)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste ARPlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWO)
15. Crop type5.`.'..��....... �.eSG..1'X!! ........
16, Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Onl rYd IIW ^ P ty; ,� � ! �,••� 5��1+`� ���
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 21�
❑ Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 4
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes l.:_I No
❑ Yes Q�No
❑ Yes Ld M
❑ Yes 0 N
❑ Yes L'J No
❑ Yes LI w
❑ Yes 1 <
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
_ : Fi3 )�� +.3.aF•'
.' Y �'}*
3.�''04' t f' � -
'Si �1
2 � >.
�
*v6"��'h
�' -- ,� 30�,2"' � k ag �'� K5� �
5� \. ?'�
}e�b �. } --
� 5 �' ,E ''s.( F •4 ,,.� k �
F?eviewer/inspector Name���
Eteviwer/Enspectar 3 Signature
J
i
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Hog F:
PO Box 517
Jackson NC 27845
Dear Mr, Stauffer:
APR - 71997 D
�EHNR
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
Facility Number 66--24 .
Northampton County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely, M�
r W. fit' pf-
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet 1
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, P�� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10°k post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Terry Stauffer
Piggy Acres Hog Farm
PO Box 517
Jackson NC 27845
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Piggy Acres Hog Farm
Facility ID#: 66-24
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Stauffer:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
. Preston Howard, Jr., . irector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P;O. Box 27687,
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 rfC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

w ' Site Requires Immediate Attention -
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEkA'RONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: `�vs
Farm Name/Owner:. P r 66v (�G t es
Mailing Address: e- a - r3 o k �i `� t! c /c rU c_ 2 ? L-/_ r
County: _ j� v ►-� H� �� _ - — _�
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: 7' j _ �_� rF r " _ Phone: al I `� i
Physical AddrrssJLocation:
Typc of Operation: Swine Poultry _ . _ _ Cattle /--
Design Capacity: ,/ t k o Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:Longitude: ' _ " Elevation: meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the ,Az3imal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Font + 7 inches s or No Actual Freeboard: zit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oj Was any erosion observed? Yes ors;
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No is the cover crop adequate or No
Croo(s) being utilized: �� �`� o �- �n rl e L 'g. �(
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 'e or No
100 Feet from We110 r�& or No
=sr a*:irnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes OQ.`'
xii.mal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue L e? Yes or i�
animal u+a~cie discharged into waters of the state by tnan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
.similar man -mane devices? (�&k or No if Yes, Please Explain.
�H oc ; 111c fadlity waintain adequate Waste mariagerncnt records (volumes of nanure,, land applied.
spray irrigated on 5pccific acreage with cover crop)'' Yes r N
Additional Comments: Tl4y e 4c cam- s � 'r `r' � ,- -' A�
1�fC�Cc-rJ 0 q .J 111-4 dIr.r 1-7c
-7'%.J.
ht UOr- /N (�7Y%-rG�� w/cf �,..— /�� ...! Cii:�•ri_ /
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
e�Ze
signarwe
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
September 27, 1995
Mr. Terry Stauffer
P.O. Box 517
Jackson, North Carolina 2.7845
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Piggy Acres Swine Farm
SR 1108 Northampton County
Dear Ms. Stauffer:
On July 11, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine potential problems associated with animal waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
swine facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the
state, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
Several cattle had access to a ditch that is a conveyance to
the adjacent swamp. This problem can be corrected by moving the
feeding/watering station -from this location and by the possible
addition of fencing. Your local Soil and Water Conservation
District has the capability to help you correct this problem.
In addition to continued facility waste management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent illegal
discharges. The Raleigh Regional Office will require a written
response to the aforementioned issues within 30 days of receipt of
this letter. You should specifically address how you plan to
correct this problem and submit a schedule (with dates) stating
when these management deficiencies will be corrected.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Terry Stauffer
Page 2
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges to surface waters of the State are
subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate
submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper--DSWC, WARO
Central Office Files
RRO files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
September 28, 1995
Mr. Terry Stauffer
P.O. Box 517
Jackson, North Carolina 27845
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Piggy Acres Swine Farm
SR 1108 Northampton County
Dear Mr. Stauffer:
On July 11, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine potential problems associated with animal waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
swine facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the
state, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
Several cattle had access to a ditch that is a conveyance to
the adjacent swamp. This problem can be corrected by moving the
feeding/watering station from this location and by the possible
addition of fencing. Your local Soil and Water Conservation
District has the expertise to help you correct this problem.
In addition to continued facility waste management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent illegal
discharges. The Raleigh Regional Office will require a written
response to the aforementioned issues within 30 days of receipt of
this letter. You should specifically address how you plan to
correct this problem and submit a schedule (with dates) stating
when these management deficiencies will be corrected.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101. Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Terry Stauffer
Page 2
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges to surface waters of the State are
subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate
submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management 2lan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
'2
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper--DSWC, WARO
Central Office Files
RRO files