660019_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number i O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
49Other Agency
Type of Visit C OiTpatice Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: EZ 0Arrival Time: � Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �'`"`� +42�►--s �Gr» 1D t./ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 2 Integrator:
Certified Operator: 5qre rJ�4/q /L Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e 0 t = At Longitude: = ° = i =
it
Design
Cnrrent
Design M-6-
Designepacity
Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Pnpulatttle
C•apIty Population
❑ Wean to Finish
La er
❑ Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
7❑
on -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La ers
ElBeef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes t] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
INA El NE
�NA [I NE
INA El NE
12128104 Continued t
i

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
a<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ,-❑ NA
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
" El NA
El NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El
/// N ❑ NA
[I NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
VNIEJ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
PNo',10
El NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Wo
Page 3 of 1 12128104

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
s
Observed Freeboard (in): 'V 1t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of'the structures observed'?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
ElYes M-1Qo - NA El NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA El
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [I Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ElNA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ElYes o ElNA ElNE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) (jOyq-5 j-/, ` o' A ✓141 '2 5
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
L N , [I NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�TNo ❑ NA
❑ NI
•''�'? � ?' y' ` a °rkria v. ,, ks �. «':, a .:#,�' d,�FY!�.'.,-. ri. `.. '.1�: •'. _..,, ;A' i ,
@ mmes(refer toqueshon4 #) �1 xpIIamanyYESanstw,ersland/orttny reco,mmendattonsior any other comments.
Us`eddrawtngs'of1faetlttystu better, explain�s�tfu,ations (us&addittonal pages as necessa�riyL)�'1Ft�
"['e�.`o'.i�t �:,?..�: " ..� T:i7�. ...-{",'r.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f2 .Ci
Date: l 252 D 2
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Type of Visit Qrcompce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ter ty �u'P ICU , -„ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ;�- Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = 1 = Longitude: 0 ° = d
Design Current Design Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Population Wet Poultry C**apacity Population
C*attle C*apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
El Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ DairyHeifer
arrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other
❑ Other
❑ TurkeyPoults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Non -La er El Dairy Calf
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field [I Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? ([f yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
A ❑ NE
A ❑ NE
A ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes < ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa ,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No ,.0 NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aaulication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes -E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) p� �, r• w �s}
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[TNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No,. ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
/ N ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
No NA
❑ NE
18. 1s there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
'Comments (refer.to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendationsiortany�at>her comments'
?Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):, a
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �— T Date: '~jo
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 7�
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ffNo C :NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 2rYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 2rNo 2NA
N 'NE
q Y
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required b the permit? El Yes [I No Q NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ N NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ElYes ElNo NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
i
S (v
� l
Page 3 of 3 12128104

9
Type of Visit O'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Qf Arrival Time: Q 0 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: a" I Cqj �_��L-- Owner Email:
Owner Name: r✓/i% ` l / A PS-2 F6-ri2—f 9 tt IVC Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: J
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:911_�_
Location of Farm: Latitude: [7e = i = Longitude: = o = 1 =
td
'i
I'3
r
Design e' CurrentDesign
Capacity Population
? �2�.rtn�vT t..AlltApiYR6®
s'C>urrent
Wet Poultry map city "Popullaation Cattle
-r-�w.31� tRe�.�t..,Pf n6 xsl..sc.
Design Cnrrent
Capacity Population
�Iu:�a.
ean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
ean to Feeder
❑Non -La ec
❑Dai Calf
❑ Fe er to Finish
arrow to Wean
b
0 Dry Poultry '
❑ La ers
❑Nan -La ers
❑Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑Turke Poults
DairyHeifer
7, ❑ D Cow
it
El Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
Number of Structures:
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
ther
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
CJ < NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ElNA
ElNE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
NA
El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

m
Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection y 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 36 it
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ��No
❑ NAElNE
❑Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes o 0-NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes No 0 NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No El NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNoQ'NA ❑ NE
maintenance/i mprovement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 1. k QIA, �+►� 1
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No . ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination;❑
Yes
No NA
ElNE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El
o 'NA
El
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name �,- b „ Gt. J s_. l�r']:`l °/1.'�" i Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21, Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA` ❑ NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No �<NAElNE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ElYes ❑ No , NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No , ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No El NA
El NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No [I NA
[I NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
- ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional. Air Quality representative immediately
VNo
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
%Adliiional,Ctir tinents and/or Drawings:Mi
a
c d"b P 111-9e_ ' S
12128104

iType of Visit 4 Compl- a Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
ReasonforVisit outine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
F eil ty Number mute of Visit: Time:
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: DiA '''LTtV O ,-1" County:
,/Lr
Owner Name: IV ��1 yU I f �`' Phone No:
Mailing Address: �� �S /':� 2 nr t-7 r+ e ( 1 S -. 1'YL �3 '2
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: 27 ,? J l ! — no j
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
[]Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 0' D1 66 Longitude 0• �� �11
Design Current
Swine Capacity Po ulatioi
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Fee o Finish
arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
[:]Boars
" 4 1Vumber of Lagoons
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current .
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer EEO]Non-Dairy
ai❑ Non -La er
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present
id Waste
DischaE= & SA- re m I_mRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Field Area i
i
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes No
El Yes
❑ Yes o
El Yes [ -
❑ Yes "o
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

l
Facility Number: k — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 1? / I., ir-J.'r{. S.� r A,4 a s=
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes E5 No
❑ Yes Ef No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 2
❑ Yes Id'No
❑ Yes No
El Yes Ala
❑ Yes
0<1
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑�N0
El Yes
❑ Yes IL3 ryo
❑ Yes M <0
❑ Yes to
❑ Yes P
❑ Yes Rio
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
ElYes No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondent out this visit.
Comments (rle,comments.
r to ttuesdo i' ), Explain any�YsES,a send/or any recommendations or a�Fi
Use drawings facility41 to betterexplarn situations (use additional pages as°°necessary): d Copy ❑Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t d
05103101 Continued

Facility Ndmber: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Lf 5O
❑ Yes Di o
❑ Yes IQ�a
❑ Yes
❑ Yes/
❑ Yes KNo
YesZZ
ElYes
❑ Yes
80
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Type of Visit O Corn nce Inspection t) Operation Review 6 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: f'ime: d
Facility Number ,
Permitted G Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: J�if h 1 074, F-71 -- County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact. —
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 0" °° Longitude • 6 11
Design Current
Swine Capacity Po ulatioi
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Feder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca aci Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I Dairy
❑ Non -La er ❑Nan-Dai
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drams
U Present LI Lagoon Area [J Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System I
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ZOth,
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard {inches}:
t t1
05103101 !
31 ON
Yes o
;Yes ,❑, No
❑ Yes i�'IVo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �, o�
El Yes I�'N0
❑ Yes V No
Stricture G
Continued

. 3 .
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type ✓r'4
13. Do the receiving cro s differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement2 (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20• Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
ElYes�Nq
No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑❑ Yes ;VN9X
Yes
El Yes
ElYes No "
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
El Yes o
❑ Yes o
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�C, , inents " refet.`to " uestion # Ex lain a y Y>aS answers and/or any recommendations or any other caaaarrtents, Tt '
C q } p
Use;drawings of faculty to better explain•situations "(use#additional pages as necessary)
a ❑ Field Copy ❑ final Notes
.. aaxxe� �" y -
•Y.4"t�'!
,y.
C'lnsx'- Z3:etll 3iS. ,M.e LAvi '^ , RH" 5
`` C,14- 4-44 f
ol,+rJ a
Z i a,•f �' s a -rl-ram*- tit J S P,-e h �`f �, ; l �r ��a� ker� s•I e r�- � o r am► - c�
/!!_i j W-5
' o- 4h � /-44 &t p9'4�/A�9 �
1 d CI vtw, - r, A� ,}'
443 0±3L Fer�-,,
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,• M3- A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: —Dr
05103101 Continued

\\
jType of Visit 0 Comp9nce Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit
Routine' O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other
❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or Visit: 3 ZS e: .f Printed on: 7/21/2000
O Not Operational 213elow Threshold
Permitted U Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....................
FarmName: .. !..�..f�r!'r...................................................... County:...................................................................................
OwnerName: .!......"".5............................. Phone No: .......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ..L� �?.!- .............: ...................Title:................................... Phone No: ................
MailingAddress: ................................................................................................................. .
OnsiteRepresentative: ..................... . ..................................................................................... Integrator: ......... _... .........................
Certified Operator:,.... r �...... ..... F2..9_ ,V,1 .................................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 44 Longitude F—Do �G F—D`s
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca aci Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer 10 Dairy
❑ F i;r to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
,ErFarrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lag -,on Area f ❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes WNIoZ
❑ Yes No
❑Yes ❑N
❑ Yes L`I
❑ Yes �Ic
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Nr
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure Structtire 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ........ ........................... .................................... ............. ....................... ........................... I........
Freehoard (inches):

7 Facility Number: l (r' I l l Date of Inspection 7 Printed on; 7/21/2000 r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designed in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
1.8. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
.ai 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25.-Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
'Vfl.yiol'aiions oi.. Ocienc�ies vt�erenote0•00-ring�h#s:Visit}• XoU wiil r.eeeiye o fuftiter
T rorresponde... about: this .visit. _ : _--
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[�
❑ Yes
No
E.Yes
LYNo ,
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes to
❑ Yes E No
ClYes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �Io
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ON-_0
❑ Yes , No
es ❑ No
❑ Yesrq
❑ Yes No
Cl Yes �13zo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 91
❑ Yes No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
6C.J. 1-1 tZfJ
S�/rn�G/a"S A14- .4
4d�r, r�
j�� P/ � 3.
r2e�,. ls e.e,�. �z,
-i-o .�/ l-1i d/� ,�}G..�
lb-6q , L 67q&�/e
=
, - 9-eI Ik,;, J(
-3 l4v-j1' = 2 / ic., s'
Reviewerfinspeclor Name /' 4 fkr_-,

Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-ug of DSWC review 0 Other
Iwl III ICI .1 ..
cility Number Date of Inspection i
Time of Inspection t) 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified (3 Registered 113 Not O erationAal/ Date Last Operated: ..........................
.1 Farm Name: ...... .!^.k.. RJ r% ,. .... County:..II Q.r .� h-,!I...........................................
Owner Name: ! .:...�..:.'� "'�3 . r:li lsj ........C..i-..1✓�.........................................
- Phone No: .......................................................................................
..........................
Facility Contact: 1Q✓ e.. �+—
..................V�Li ." ...................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: „!7�?r;�:...01..�.....�.......................................................... Integrator:...:.��.i.!9.h'S....... ..........................
Certified Operator:.......... , v� 1. 4 g, Operator Certification Number:,
.................................................................................. .........................................
.ocation of Farm: fps v
A
.....................
Latitude `7 t, .0 1 =11 Longitude E�1:1' �' EZZ"
F Design" `, Current
Design Cairrent:;; ; tDesign` :° Current
s;
Ca `ace i',-Po ufatton:'
Poultry
1
Ca aci Po utahon t1e Ca ace Po ulagon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
.. ..� .:.
❑ Dairy,'
❑ Fe to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non-Dairy
W arrow to Wean
,I
`I' Farrow to Feeder
'yi ❑Other
F'E 1
Farrow to Finish
T6UUDeslgn'CapaClty ,
Gilts
III
a
�.: ; [I Boars
t ���
1
1 �I i.Tota1SSL'W lea
"'
3 x I Neamb r Lagoons
Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area i
�s Hof
E � - a } � i` i' .l
$nds Solid Traps R
[ i ..
1�. ^r� �I
No Liquid Waste Management System
Ii ;Holding'
❑
i °z
.... ., x�.,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnan-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (It* yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑Ai�'
❑ Yes ❑
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 0140
r'
Cl Yes o
Structure 6
Identifier: 1 l
Freeboard(inches): .........J.V....................................::............................................................
......
.............................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes o
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

[Facility. Number: — f Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ;'Zo
_
❑ Yes
❑ Yes oo
❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes �No
12. Crop type 4�' r
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the.Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail, to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes .lz
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes P q
❑ Yes 00
❑ Yes 21' o�
❑ Yes ! No
❑ Yes B' o
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes LJ N
❑ Yes `LJ N
❑ Yes No

'IF'aeility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
1e 0 30 z/ z'q-
es ❑ No
❑ Yes �10
❑ Yes Iff No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes <
❑ Yes ❑ lya�
❑ Yes J o
al

Facili y-Number Date of Visit: � Time: C„! Gad I
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
ermitted [3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: a i... �099a,... ......... County: .... �dY'f ��
OwnerName: ...IU.1=..C-............................................................................... Phone No:........................................,............................................
FacilityContact:............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: .... Integrator:�G C �`r
................./�.................
Certified Operator: K ��p,,, [ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� ��. Longitude �• �� ���
Design," Curtent Design<CurTent
Ca aci Po` t>ilatron Poultry , . • Capacity ; .Popu1 tldn Cattle C
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
LEE
❑ Boars
i Number of Lagoons , l❑ Subsurface Drains Present �I❑ Lagoon Area . I❑ Spray Field Area
1. ^^'
�Holdlug Ponds 1 Solid Traos' 'T ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �No`�
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............�� O.. .I .......... .................................... I............I...... .......................................................................................
❑ Yes 01�o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Ye
,.�n No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches):
S/00
Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 1-7ZZTZZ1 Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste. Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes Flo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ZNo
El Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
12. Crop type (je r I'r PS
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes N
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ZN
o15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ YesFo?
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes
24, Does facility•requirc a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o
25. We any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? [I Yes ❑ No
�.*iolhttQiis or- dgficiendia-g -were noted• diWirig �his:visit' • Yoo will-> ooh,e ij fu t�gr
corres' ondence: abvut this visit . • .. • ' • . .
Comments (refer to question #) y Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments L �k t i
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as,necessary): _ ; 4 , 013. t ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: —2 //y/ 5100

r
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond'or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below OYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes o
5100

Q D1VI510 Soil andhWateCl Conset'hvatlOn QperatioR Review j ; $q+
t € lepli "ts {ii -.. €t er6'a r
QD' ion QfSOl118RdrWater<COnSCCVatIOR Cpmpllaneeinspeetlonlr I�iki il;t!�I f10-� Ef,l� 1 d'� '63€1`6s;a ,,�E
Ivision,ofwater: 1,al tl,l,�,,,. l,,n,,.a 3 p'<el . €6::E1 39 4 € , ''l'�!'tl'!�i'Ilo3h,E+l i} °�j'o '� €,6;✓ 3£i
t t,E 1 , , ❑ b IQuB lt�k� €tiCQIMlpllal1Ce �n$l3eCgOn'
...
<tllerAgeRCy,r DpelAttOnt.@V1CW
�Q'Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Faci ' y Number Date of Inspection
'Time of Inspection } 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered g 0 Not O erattonal Date Lust Operated:
Farm Name: �.�..L ..... '?`j ?Zr-s ...................................... County: ............... .... -- ...............
............................
Owner Name:... ;.......!.,5 !'�? 2.�-s ..-- .r/ L Phone No:
Facility Contact: ............................................... .!;. . I .........Title:......................................I......................... hone No:
Mailing Address:... 1.....Q.0.......... .....% ..........yt......... .Q.,x..d.G./ ......... !� -7-)...,.,.......................... ........,.................
/I/ r
Onsite Representative: � i. j........... .. ......... Inte;gyrator:.4v:..!........�nf....(�.��i��...............
..... .... ....:.�-. r ...........
Certified Operator: ........... �1...'.1..!]7!..I..j....,...0 J.4..O.-F r+►„r................................_ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: I.J9 I, , u/ 4
r................................................................................ J_..'..
Latitude �� �� Longitude • �' �'j
Design Current ` ;�' �, `' Deslg'ii Current _, Design Current
Swine,EcaacityoulatloCapacity Eo ulation Ca aci Population. Poultry: te
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer El Dairy
❑ Fee r-to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars ` Total -SSLW
i Niabiber of Lagoons,.. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑-La
goon Area Spray Geld Area
A.
Holding3Ponds / Soli Traps ; ,l E ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
g.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/thin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes , No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 9>0//
❑ Yes PW
❑ Yes V
N
❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier-
Freeboard
� .tt
.............. .. Freeboard (inches):..............................................................................................................................................................................
...
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, No/
seepage, etc.) ❑ yes
3/23/99 Continued on t.

Facility Number: Date ofinspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type 6, Q,r'- w 1 A , cv Ya't . S'r94 a
❑ Yes eeN<o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
ElYes N
❑ Yes No
13. Do the receiving crops differ'with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Z No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes � fI� o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes To
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E5 o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) El Yes N
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes N
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes r o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. Does fac'li vy require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N
25. W e any additional problems noted which causd noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Yes o
o yiolaro . . . .... ies wire jngtea clueing sit: Yoitt ;wilt r;eceiye o; #'urth�r
correspondence: abvuk this visit. ..::::: ::::::.:::: ...
::: ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
:...
...
...
...
.
3/23/99

rFacilityNumher: — late of inspection
Odor ISSLies
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes /No
ElYes o
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes j No
3/23/99

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
D;Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
J] Divisior of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
1 Other'Agency - Operation Review
O Routine O Com faint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follo,-u orDS�VC review O Other
Facility Number D.Itc of 111St11'L'tif111
Time of Inspeclinli � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 1131.Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ID%J., ......................................................... County: ...ti Q.1L. 'f ;<.. ;rs`��S.J....................
Owner Name :............. Phone No:
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Fitle:............,................................................... Phone No: ...................................................
AdailingAddress:.................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: (J,I{J E— A F tnteurator:................... . ......................
Certified Operator :................................. ..... . Operator Certification Number
......................................................................... .................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • ° �• Longitude ° �: �•
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I 1 1[:] Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Are.
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharites & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it rCI1eh W Itcr nf' the State" (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estintawd flow in galhnin''
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (lf ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 SIRLClure 5
+r
❑ Yes [;lo
❑ Yes �NO
❑ Yes 5�(No
1
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
70
❑ Yes
(� No
SU'tICIUrc
{�/
Identifier:
Freeboard............ ........ .............
..... ...........................................................................I.............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,El Yes No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued dfn hack

Facility Number:U - - Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-;ite which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
El Yes
XNo
If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ YesXNo
elevation markings?
Waste Ap2lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pondhi , ❑ PAN
❑ y
xo
12. Crop type C C dy /
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Manageme t Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
�^1'es
❑ No
'%J ` C ',
15. Does the receiv ng c�rropneed impr v mcnt?
❑ Yes
o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
EYNo
Required Records. & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
2rNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, elc.)
❑ Yes
ZNo
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (se/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
ZNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
z o
21. Did the facility faii to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
❑ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of cmerII-ency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes VN 0
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes �INo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes IN0
:: Vo violaiigris or &flcienctes -r'ere pgt:ed• du•rifng #iiis:vtsit'. Yoit will receive Rio further. -
corres� 6fidence. aba f this .visit.......:: :::..... .
Comments:(re fer to question #):''Explairit any YES answers andlor any recomi iendattons dr any'other cbirninents `�, a
Ilse drawings of f iHity to better explain.situations. (use additional gages as necessary) a ,
-7 , �U ��-� .�U6 7 1,71-10,c) ,fiaQ L
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
3/23/99

of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
of Water Quality
Facility Number u...�•o�
Date of Inspection !
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered E3 Certified E3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated
Farm Namr..<....�.L..L..9:!! 5...._F^..5 �:_.'..�.:........ii 4i i0t ✓ Countya�r.%'3.r!a!1....................................
II --'' �p
Owner Name:...V�..'.1.1..�.f! s.....!!/Lii.S....... 1l..flwF—�!'.��,h�Phone No: .....4J� Z
Facility Contact: %y F.lt/.¢:.._644—.fkn^............................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address:.............Q..i..... i...........M. 0.C./G......... N
..... L....................... 50
.................!.....................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: .......
n,4V..e..._pl4H-11..............................W...../C%C
.... %......................... Certified Operator ...... .tl4&/..jq?�....... A' .. ............................................ Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =*=, =11 Longitude 0' =, ="
t' ' �,DesignW
Curint "" Design-'
Current Desi q Current
g
"Capacrty)Population
Poultry, Capacity
Population Cattle _ Capacity .Population
'" ❑ Wean to Feeder.
Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ F er to Finish
1 ❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
'.
[]Farrow to Feeder.
❑Other
a
Total Design Capacity I�
[]Farrow to Finish
ff Gilts
N; u
❑Boars
Total SSLW:
Nnmber f Lagoo
m
/•Holding Ponds ,L--4�sr. ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
I[] Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
�
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallium?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes J 0
❑ Yes X0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Ef
❑ Yes
Yes �
El.
❑ Yes VN
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No

e
Facility Number: — r
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures La�oons,Nolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure L Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 . Structure 5
❑ Yes 12 o
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ............'.................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(1f any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes en No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes No
(If in excess WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
/o�f,
/•.s�c••+-.•
15. Crop type �r[!�,.,,��i??NO+±.$!n'`!✓o......................................................................................................................................•---------
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes ErNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Q., o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes 6rs O
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to'discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes��O�
24. Were an ditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
25.Ze any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes No
oviolationsor deficiencies. were, noted, during this, visit, - You ,will receive, i oo. further .
-
corres'p4itdeike about this:visit:: :. :... .. ...... ,

i
(�DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
h i ❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
r
e ,...
Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of MV0 inspection
FacilityNumber
Follm -u of DSIVC: review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 2
'rime of Inspection 1124 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit iex: i.25 for 1 hr 11 mini) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes ti-Avel and processing)
❑ Not operaational Date Last Operated:................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: ........ .- ✓?Vl... .. ..... County: ... o:..... 4'. '.. �. .. '..7./.. .1........: ...................
OwnerName:....,..i. '.. �,� /'� �.........a�l •'-� I'hnne No:............................................................................................................
Facility Contact: ..,'kith.: .... Phone No:
Alxllinr:1L1iII'4ss:....................................................................:..................................................... ........................................ ..,............. ............. I.......... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ...P,&C1 fa....... ............................................ Integrator :.....itv.�.!��.�..��.M...,.5..............................
Certified Operator: ........................................ .. Operator Certification Number
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude. ��• �' 0°
Type of operation Design Cui rent ` .,:Design,::::.:.. Current°' A Design Current
swine :;. Capacity Population:: Poultry Capacity, Populatigri Cattle Capacity. Papulatioi
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2• Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharee originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convey°once man-made'?
b, lf'discharge is observed, slid it reach SUr11ce Water? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c: If dish u,-e is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?.
4/30/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes /0 No
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ Yes
LeNo
❑ Yes
IVNo
Con ittued
-
:ya •
on 'W

Fadlity Nttmbe .
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
❑ Yes
[ No
Structures (Lagoons,Iloldint' Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
7� ,Structure
Identifier: rr�(l111`
Freeboard(ft) .........%1. �.,,,,......................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
Pfgo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
12'No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
F,.e(No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
VNO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
;dNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
4� No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
1�(No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
O No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
,,,,�(No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
El Yes
,CJ No
[ : No.vialations_or deficiencies.were_n6ted,d66n' gg this" visit. , You:rviII:r, kei ve:n6ltirtheir
cOerespotidehce About this. visit'.-'-'.'.
Ctcc t=
�G�YJ.tJ'idn'T,{�:er`t 5 v ex i> iJ/L'�OIIt°E7� �J`�is✓i /-�
cN n C2d TIf/s-
I Cf 5,*7,•t G TE{ 1 5 ��-�- G- r�{/ J f1v / c FOrL e1eV47 tI
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:/`%f'/��gGj,��� U�vJ� :� Date;
fib

"'
.,,�a',xit
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection F ,�
10 Routine' 0 Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection -0 Fallow=u 'of DSWC review-'�10Other
Date of Inspection. ll
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin traction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1?5 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified . ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Not O perational Date Last Operated:............................................................................................................
FarmName: ..................W.w......................................................... County:.....................................................................................
OwnerName:............................................................................ ................................................ Phone No:..............................................,........................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:.................,........,..................................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:,..../.t.I............... LLY'�.. ..... Integrator:.... .......................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • =' 44 Longitude rr • �� �14
T e of O eration
Yp p Design.,, .,
{ Swine Ca- it
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
• ❑ Other
Subsurface Drains Present Jj❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischar�-e is observed, was the conveyance inan-made'? ❑Yes No
h, if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes /ZNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P No
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes C"No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require _.es ❑ No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

- Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes V�No
^�j.8.•vAre there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Uf No
Structures (lagoons andlor Holding fonds
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes V No
Freeboard (.ft): Strucvr� I Structure Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
........ I..,t... .�.................................... I.................................................................................................................................................................. I.....
10,
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level'markers?
Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
VNO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ...fiii.. SLCJ . ..... ! . f...........
............................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A)&MP)?
OYes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
9&0
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
XYes
ETN o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�dNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
9*110
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
C
For Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management flan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement? t`�L�;�S
ta. � ,` Fln_ -rrL 14 O FF
❑ Yes
❑ No
PAA"tl U5 tT'�UN�t7 vim' Q a" d
t7. R,cq-v r7 2 6 41- jbg c k- lti
)9A1D ntrAt}
d- twvero aw A6ZU0 .
r
/'9%.W
S p�orl i,- l.v,/_ �_
�PtiA-crn�L Pt%��
.' �. A/e &- -0 4? Tv
Reviewer/Inspector NameROW
..�}�"# f� �` W }f
'1 Fe
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: i?
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection'
mwwww
O Follow'w-'bf DWO in
Facility Number
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
gCertiried [3 Permitted
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName.......... .L..e[J. *„.1..................................................
Follow-u�of DSWC review--'O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(cx:l?S for 1. hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
................................................................................................................................................
County: ..................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.............................,.........................................................
Facility Contact: ........................ ................. Title:................ . Phone No:
MailingAddress: .....................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:....... p4n...............Ll.r'%..f�
...............
CertifiedOperator: .................................................. .................. ...........................
Location of Farm:
Integrator: ....................................
Operator Certification Number :.........................................
im i iii
C
C
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation `
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
DesigiiCurrent „r "
Poultry Capacity Population ,Cattle `
❑ Layer I I Dairy
J Non -Layer I 10 Non-DairyI
a < Total Design .Capacify
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present I ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? El Yes iNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes �No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes VNo
c. Ifdischar�,e is observed, what is the estimated flow in galinu'?n
d. Does di,cliarge bypass a lag*oon system'? (If yes, ntitify 1)WQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ElYes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lanoons/holding ponds) require 1 s No
maintenance/improvement?
�/3�/97 Continued on back

Facility Number —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have.a certified operator in responsible charge?
v;rv.
m 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?._
Structures ( Lagoons and/or Holding, Ponds)
-9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft):ruct� I Structure 2 ,Structure 3 Structure 4
dJ
.............................................................................................. ..................... .......................... I ............ ....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
I I- Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes R1 No
❑ Yes ONo
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .�l..L.,........'..��.....................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Onl
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
.......................................................
❑ Yes
;Z No
❑ Yes
ONo
VI Yes
❑ No
/Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[�No
...............................
Cl Yes j2(No
(� Yes ❑ No
(❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
1-7, Pry,40 � 2 Emrri� LAWIr Ws 1 ti 6
rt O--P l VD l ti 1-0 Cei 77/_j)
SO C490 s pecw6, ICE 6EM vat
TV MA' "5- A- t P .5
ti
�. � -o S �_S D V G T fj► j !cr t�
Z�
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,> x W--, -- - -- As ---
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone]
+ itate
)of North Carolina
epartment of Environment,
lealth and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Apr 28 197 15:07 P.02f05
1••
MW
[DEHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 3,f1997
Dr. Fred Cunningham, DVM
Williams Farms of N.C.
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Subject:
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Compliance
Facility #
Dunlow Farm
Northampton
Evaluation
66-19
County
Inspection
On March 27, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division'% efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the Swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into,waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste _mana management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil. and Water
Conservation District office.
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101, A* FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N� C Are Eaua1 Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:919-71S-60481 Apr 28 '97 15:07 P.03/05
i
i
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Hill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
It Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more .information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this 'inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO files
RECEIVED
APR 16 1991
FACUTIES ASSESSMENT UMT
k>

ti
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A��
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13,1996
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Williams Farms of North Carolina
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-19
Williams-Dunlaw Farm
Northampton County
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
On October 24, 1996, Mr. Buster Towels from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. As a result
of the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with
the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, �� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N :fKC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Williams-Dunlaw
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
it Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
�T ( f . A alv�e
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. John Fitzgerald -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13,1996
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Williams Farms of North Carolina
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-19
Williams--Dunlaw Farm
Northampton County
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
On October 24, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. As a result
of the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with
the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NifC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Williams-Dunlaw
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
of Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. John Fitzgerald -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

+� Facility Number: 4�
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:-;- 7-3
Time:
General Inf rmation:
Farm Name: r 11, r'9/"+— County: n4 rl
Owner Name: Fart-' IG Gam-Wg t S Phone No: 9 19 - S 0'9 - 01 � y
On Site Representative:___ q ti^ x t i Ge Integrator: Lv , /1' - w- s-
Mailing Address:
Physical
Latitude: 1 1 Longitude: 1 I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Typyo f Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Sow 3 ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder
OtherType of Livestock. Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:- - I (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Ins ection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: !
Yes ❑'
No ❑
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Yes ❑
No
Is erosion observed?:
Yes ❑
No C-1�
Is any discharge observed?
Yes ❑
No
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Yes ❑
No ❑'
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
Yes allo ❑
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Ix /= escHy Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Yes 0
No
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Yes ❑
No
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ❑
No
Is animal waste land applied ed or spray ungatedwithin 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes❑
No -J
AOI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes U-'No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ��UNo ❑
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ICI' Igo ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes Z No ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature: / _ _ Date:_ 3 — 2C
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings ow -Observations:
Use Attachments if Needed
AOI -- January 17,1996

Facility Number:
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:. _10-
Time:
General Information:
Farm Name:_ Dj,a<"4.j 24, County:
Owner Name: tv4 L P L Phone No:
One Site Representative: 0 r C rx h ._ H so�- Integrator:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location
Latitude: I 1 Longitude: 1 I
Operation Description: (abased on design characteristics)
Ty Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
ow OLayer ODairy
ONursery r0[7 - ❑Non —Layer E]Beef
OFeeder
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: ( (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Ffacillt�r Inspection: 2 r e",-a60,x-j
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑. No ❑
Is any discharge observed?: Yes 0 No ❑
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage: _

Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Does record keeping need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or Observations:
AO1-January 17, 1996
Date:
Use Attachments if Needed

- n L-14-1995 15.26 FROM DEM DATER DUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires immediate Aiten!jon-"__�
Facility No. U6
DNISION OF'ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN-'T
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: '9 l 5 ` , 1995
. Time: 01 O D
P; x m Name/Owner:_-Fy -1? fL Lv�l / 1 4 �-s _ 0 u L 9-y l`/t_f_Lk._ -
Mailing Address: 6�0 Z a 142 ,S
County: Jll 0 r j -/ Q
Integrator. `►"._ Av 11
. A--M' Phone: 1 :2 O O
On Site Representative: SG04 F r' t !� _ _ Phone:.
Physical Address/Location: OFF � G
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle F' — G�.✓
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: 2S_r
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: _' ` Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the .Amoral Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxi=ceiv 1 Foot f 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: i. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoons)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray'? Yes or No 1s the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: ' G % 4-x-f
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'?
200 Feet from Dwellings'lYes or No
100 Feet from Wells? e or No
ate animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
{
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated Within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or No
animal waste discharged into of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
,imi;ar mats -made cic ��ices'? Y,es r No If Yes. Please Explain.
pr y ow facility maintain adequate waste mariagernctit records ('volumes of nnanure, land applied -
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop0 Yes or!
Additional Comments: n r o KPH.. rs 4' t S L`ytJ— t�� �S r f�J kac3�^
p S rrb T ! � L v Llvt 1/V�9 3 r (i
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
" uv/,-
S igna acre
Use Attachments if Needed -
TOTAL F _ 32

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 25, 1999
Williams Farms of NC Inc
Dunlow
PO Box 416
Moyock NC 27958
Attn: Fred Cunningham
A&44
IL
NC,DENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660019
Dunlow
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Northampton County
Dear Fred Cunningham:
In accordance with your application received on February 2, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Williams Farms of NC Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Dunlow, located in Northampton County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 650 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date, of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system' in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms Ind conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
r . -*

Certificate of Coverage AWS660019
Dunlow
Page 2
ve the
to
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained ntact n the engineethis COC are r lis ed belowyou
foranformationt on
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by co g
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
ta
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Re ion concerning gates Qua i yoS the
ff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need add
itional General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincer ,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Northampton County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Williams Farms of NC Inc
Dunlow
PO Box 4] 6
Moyock NC 27958
Dear Williams Farms of NC Inc:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
December 30, 1999
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeepiig
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 66- 9
Northampton -County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY] , DRY2, -DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environpient and Natural Resource
Division of Water Quality COP
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
HIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) )III*
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION: RECEIVED
1.1 Facility Name: Dunlow WATER QUALITY SECTION
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Williams Farms of NC Inc FEEB 0 7 anon
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 416
City, State: Mo ock NC Zip: 27958 on -Discharge Permitling
Telephone Number (include area code): W-435-6930
1.4 County where facility is located: Northampton
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): _ From Gaston take SR 46 West about 8 miles. Farm is
on left. r , .,..,.• ...•__..,.
1.6 •Print Farm Managees name (if different from Land Owner): fit.-
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation:
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 66 (county number); 19 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descrip i not no Swine operation to Wean
650- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; r7 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum numTer'or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 6 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 66 -19

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 40 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 33.1
2.4 Number o lagoons storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or(3� (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YE or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? [Q 7 l
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your- iniiials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations; ,.
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
Feld locations where animal waste is land applied;
r"
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1,"The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2', Me method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3✓A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4wThe soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5✓Me crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6✓Me Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7wThe PAN applied to every land a plication field.
3.3.8-17he waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9-''fhe required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10'A site schematic.
3.3.1 YErnergency Action Plan.
3.3.12LMsect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.l: 4y;; ,
3.3.1360dor Control Checklist with chosen best managembnt practices. noted.
3.3.14Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15<agoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16-Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
Q
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 66 -119

RECEIVED
VATER QfJ.4,iTY SECTION
Facility Number: 66 - 19 ffB 0 21999
Facility Name: Dunlow
Non -Discharge Paimitting
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, t 1 S ��'�e�,�c _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for UNjDw �•Q7Q _______ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me an _ is accurate and c mplete to est of
my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature w,� � aadA Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, (Manager's name fisted in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete tote best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98

to
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (INS)
AsbevWe Regional WQ Supervisor
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
]Weigb Regional WQ S%wvisor
59 WoodSn Place
943 Washington Square Mall
38W But Dr.
AshevWe, NC 28801
Washington, NC 27889
Raleigh, NC 7761.1
[phone]
(919) 94"481
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery Macon
Beaufort Jones
Chatham ' Nash
Buncombe Madison
Bertie Lenoir
Durham Northampton
Burke McDowell
Camden Martin
Fdgecombe Orttrtge
Caldwell Mitchell
Chowan Pamlico
FhWtlin Person
Cherokee Polk
Craven , Pasquotaak
Qranville Yana .
i-Uy. Rudwfurd
Currituck Puimans ` _
-' Halii'a: wake%
Graham Swain'.
Dare Pitt
Jobnston Warren
Haywood Transylvania
0011", Tgrell
Lee Wilson
Henderson Yancey
Greene Washutgtcxt
Jackson
Hertford Wayne
Hyde
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wacbovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Richmond
Cumberland
Robeson
Harnett
Sampson
Hoke
Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem. NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamauee Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Sutry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 29115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander
Lincoln
Cabarms
Mecklenburg
Catawba
Rowan
Cleveland
Stawy
Gaston
hedell
Union
J
Wilmingtm Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 284054845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret O116100
Columbus Ponder
Duplin
FORM; AWO-G-E S128198
Page 4 of 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Williams Farms of NC / Dunlow Farm
Location:
7 miles west of Gaston on NC 46
Telephone:
252435-6930
Type of Operation:
Farrow/Wean
Number of Animals: 650
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Application Method:
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of the surface and/or
ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer
required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are required so all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in a environmentally safe manner:
I . Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do
not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials; cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be
applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or
forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you
need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility.
Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some
cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall
be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and the
crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted
by the Environmental Management Commission.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (zallons, tons, etc.)
650 animals x 8.8 / day x 365 gal. Waste / animal / year = 2,087,800 gals. waste / year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrozen (PAN) Produced Per Year
650 animals x 5.4 lbs. PAN / animal / year = 3510 lbs. PAN / year.
( PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the
waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract
H
Field
!!TVV0
soil
Crop
R.Y.E.
x
N Application
Rate
Lba.
N/A,.*
Comm. N or
Residual N/Acre
Amos
Lbs. N Utilised "'
Month of Application
2631
3
TO
Bermuda [lay
6.0
50
300
0
10.6
3,180
-
2631
3--
TuB
Wheat -Grain
50
50
0
10.6
530
Nov. -March
2631
4
TO
Comm Bermu
aj&50
240
0
2.9
6%
2631
4-
TuB
Wheat -Grain
50
50
0
2.9
145
Nov, March
2631
1
TuB
Cotton
650
0.12
78
0
8
624
Ma -June
2631
1^
TUB
wheat ham
50
50
0
8
400
Nov. -March
2631
2
TuB
Cotton
650
0.12
78
0
8.1
632
may -June
2631
1^
TuB
Wheat -Grain
50
50
0
8.1
405
Nov. -March
none
none
rtonc
none
Totals 59.2 l 6 612
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they
must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding or double cropping.
*** Lbs. N Utilized equals total required nitrogen from waste less any commercial nitrogen supplied.
Indicates that this is field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Reference is from Sixth Guidance Memo (Revision Two) issued on August 25, 1998 including a memo from Dr.
Jim Green, Chairman, Crop Management Practices for Selected Forages Used in Waste Management. (see attached
memo for suggested management practices and expected yields and total amount of PAN/acre.)
A Indicates that this field is being double cropped ( two different crops planted in the same field during the same
year). In the case of wheat followed by soybeans followed by corn planted the following year we have allowed 20
lbs. N/ac to carryover into the PAN requirements for corn, (i.e. 201bs. N / ac has been decreased from the corn PAN)
due to residual nitrogen from the soybean plant.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not have adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
WWI
M
(See footnotes for Table 1)
Totals from above Table I & Table 2
Table 1
Table 2
Total
Amount of N
Total.
Acres
Lbs. N Utilized
59.2 1
6,612
n/a
n/a
59.2 1
6,612
Produced
**** Balance
3510
-3102
**** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Note: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates.
The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or
other elements.
Acres shown in each field of the preceding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers,
filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due
to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres
shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that address all
nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 3: Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field #
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate (In/Hr)
Application Amount
Ln/Event *
3
TuB
Bmnu& Hay
0.5
1.0
3—
TuB
wtmt-Gmin
0.5
1.0
4
TuB
CommB=MU& Hay
0.5
1.0
4—
TuB
Mnmt-&ain
0.5
1
TuB
Cotton
0.4 bare
1 ^
TuB
Wheat -Orin
0.5
2
TuB
cotton
0.4 bare
2^
TuB
Wheat-Gmi,
0.5
(none)
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop
is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen
limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or
ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and
organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time
of irrigation not should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and the
irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and
2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Your facility is designed for 75 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 2_ _ _ months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure
exceed 1.7 feet from the top of the dike.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of
waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation:
Waste will applied to bermuda hay, wheat, & cotton.
Wheat will be overseeded into bermuda. The PAN for overseeding small grain into bermuda is 50 lbs/acre above the
normal rate for coastal. Small grain must be harvested before the heads begin to form (ref See Sixth Guidance
Memo, Revision Two, 1.11
Cotton and wheat will be double cropped on the same field the same year.,
(1) Total acreage was calculated by using all waste application fields as individual fields in the same crop year, thus
this reflects the total acres that may receive waste in a given year, not mapped acres.
Mortality management will be by complete incineration and ashes will be land applied to spray fields.

.1
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Producer: Williams Farms of NC/Dunlow Farm
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the routine operation and maintenance work needed
to keep this swine waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is considered to be
normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
1. Maintenance
a) The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
i) Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side slopes: bermuda and fescue
should be well established on these areas. The embankment should be fertilized with 10-10-10
per acre each year to maintain a vigorous stand.
ii) Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done by mowing, spraying, or
chopping, or a combination of all three. This will need to be done at least once each year and
possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
b) Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made at least annually. Items to be checked should
include, as a minimum, the following:
i) Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a) Condition of pipes
( 1) Separation of pipes
(2) Cracks or breaks
ii) Pool Area
a) Undesirable vegetative growth
b) Floating or lodged debris
iii) Embankment
a) Settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
b) Side slope stability - slumps or bulges
c) Erosion and rodent damage
iv) Transfer Pumps
2. Operation
a) Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total of 650 / Farrow/Wean. The
lagoon contains both permanent and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be in order to
ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The design include§ permanent storage of one cubic foot per
pound of steady state live weight.
b) The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capability for the volume of waste produced over
75 days, the amount of rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in excess of
evaporation. Your facility is designed for 75 days of temporary storage; therefore, it will need to

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
be pumped every 2 months. Begin pump out of the lagoon when the liquid level reaches
elevation 98.7 as marked by the permanent marker. Stop pump out when the liquid level reaches
elevation _96.5 .
c) The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan recommends sampling and
testing of waste every 90 days and before land application. The waste material should be analyzed
before each application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of the area of application
must be made annually to insure the waste is applied as reasonably and practically possible to
recommended rates.
d) It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -charged to'/2 it's capacity to prevent
excess odors during start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the
lagoon thereby reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing
odors. Solids should be covered with effluent at all times.
e) The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States.
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources; Division of Environmental
Management, has the responsibility for enforcing the law.
i
i

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Williams Farms of NC
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (We) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (We) know
that any expansion to the existing capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (We) also understand that &re must be no discharge of animal
waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
dame of Facility Owner: miease Prio 'lliams Farms of NC
ignature: '4 ��r=ice Date: 19 9,9
Name of Manager (if difre t fi= ):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan : David Oldham
Affiliation : Certified Technical Specialist
Address : 414 Hwy 158
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
25 -8210
Signature: Date: �� 9
❑ New Plan ® Revised Plan Date:1/19/99 ❑ Amended Plan Date

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE
SWINE LAGOON
IENTS�NAME-�`-,^--===>
Williams Dunlaw
WUNTY
-_>
r amptan
TODAYS
DATE ___________________________>
8/27/97
SITING
LAW DISTANCES OKAY (YES OR NO) =>
Yes
NUMBER
OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
0
NUMBER
OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH ====_==>
0
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING
550
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER =______>
0
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
0
NUMBER
OF DEVELOPING GILTS =-__-,--___,>
0
NUMBER
OF STUD BOARS OR GESTATING SOWS >
0
NUMBER
OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
0
(5 year minimum unless retrofit)
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =---=--_==>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =__>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 6.6
(minimum depth including sludge = 6 feet)
(maximum depth.of sludge = 2 feet)
SIDE SLOPES=___-�------------------�_=>
Permanent Volume Required 159560.5
Permanent Volume Provided 170821.2
DITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (VEGETATED) ===>
DITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (NON-VEGET.) ==>
(i.e. feedlot & non -diverted area)
ADDITIONAL, D. A. WITH EVAPORATION
(i.e. pumpout pond)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY
NORMAL RAINFALL FOR PUMPING CYCLE
PERCENT RUNOFF ON VEGETATED AREAS =---_>
PERCENT RUNOFF ON NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
NORMAL EVAPORATION FOR PUMPING CYCLE
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =------------=>
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM VEGETATED AREAS
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
INCLUDE HEAVY RAIN (YES=1, NO=O)
FREEBOARD
236.0
FEET
134.0
FEET
96.0
FEET
93.0
FEET
89.4
FEET
feet
2.5.1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
0 SQUARE FEET
90 DAYS
0 GALLONS
21.5 INCHES
30 PERCENT
65 PERCENT
12.6 INCHES
6.7 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0.0 INCHES
0 (NUMBER ONLY)
1.0 FEET
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION ========> 100.0 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume Needed 99029.7 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Volume Provided 103422.0 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = •.100.0 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 256.0 feet Width = 154.0 feet
ESTIMATED DEPTH TO PUMP = 2.2 FEET
ke
lume To Be Pumped = 77018 cubic feet
me for Estimated De th = cubic feet
gin Pumping Elevation = 98.2 fee
Stop Pumping Elevation = 96.0 feet

0 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHO9 57 _��A5
DWQ
ENLERGENCY INIA.NAGEN ENT SYSTEM _ 911
SWCD .9,3a-.25.21_ ---
IvRCS )3_4 25gl
This plan •ill be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking.
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted Ln an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed befow.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the Iagoon irnmediatel_v.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lasoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application. '
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include; ,
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks F-ior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakice from flush systems. houses. solid separator. -action include:
.1. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation puinp.
c. Make sure no :iph on occurs.
J. Stop :ill tiow,i in ilie !souse. tlu,;h or �Qild separators.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting purlips.
E: Leakage from bass or side�vall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
put in a submersible pump. and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how march was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
. 3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office: Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-t3-39-12.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the Iocation or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The carrecd%-e
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - -
and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number -
4: If none of the above v,-orks call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to diem and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contractor of your chorcc to begirt repair of problem to minimize off -site
daml,e.
a. Contractors mare: s of/YC.
b. Contractors Address: .tau p ce K , •+�i?
-1
C. Con[r.sctors Phoric:.�'/��
0

• b: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Enginc4r. etc.)
r1
•
a. rtiamt:— .I—nORES
b. Phone:=
is Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from Happening again.
! I �96

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause UNIPs l0 111iniluize Odor Sile Specific Practices
l argil teal0 Swine producliowt Cevegetative or wooded but- ers;
L-3 Recommended best mananement practices;
0 /Good judgment and common sense
Ai,imal bo.ly surfaces 0 flirty manurc-covered animals 11 pry floors
1:1114)1 !,Ht t':,ces a Wei manutc-covered !lours - ER"Sloued floors;
[?l!' Waterers located over slowed floors;
0-*"Eeeders at high end of solid floors;
1" Scrape manure buildup from floors;
2- llnrlerfloor'ventilation for drying
I,,nolC CUIIC1t11111 Ails • I, rime; f-} 1'reyuent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• I'arlial microbial decomposition or scrape;
Ff,�,Underfloor venlilatiuil
VCIIId.111o11 c\l,aust tans
• Volatile gases;
_
Fan ulaiutenanCe;
Dust
L4"I:Ificicnt air ruovcmcnt
tu,lour snrfales
• Dust
Washdown bei\Veen groups of animals;
rn
Deed addilives;
f]
Feeder covers;
L1
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
i:lu-dh laliks
0 Agitulian ofreeycled lagoon
n
rhlsh lank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near boltuln of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
1:11I511 alleys
• Agitation during wastewater
❑
Underfloor hush ►vide underfloor ventilation
conveyance
I'll Iccholi;c I,uilils • Agitation of recycled lagoon 17.1 Extend recharge lines to ue:u bollun, of.JOS
liquid While pits are Iiliing wills anti-siphmt vents
Lift a Agitation during sump wA 0 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
nut>idr.,lrain collection • Aglialio„ during waslewalcr I'] ilex covers
ur junction boxes cunveyancc
AhI( November 11, 1116, Page 3

SOLIM:
Cause
1;iNIPS to Aliililidu Odor SIIC Specific Prmefices
Esd of drainllipes at
Agitation during wastewater
❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
l;boos
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Laguull surfaces
Volatile gas emissions;
9--lProper lagoon liquid capacity,
• Biological rnixillg;
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation
fi"inimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
0,44inimurn agitation when.pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
IiiiL lllon Sllrtlikler
• Iligh pressure agitation;
Irrigate on dry days with little: or no lvind-,
noLLlcs
• Wind drift
C lVllniniu n recommended operating pressure;
lump intake near lagoon Iigiiid surface;
3--'pump from second -stage lagoon
Slorage lack or basis
Partial Microbial {Iccouiposition-,
Elotiom or midlevel load•trlg;
siilauc 0 Mixing while filling; ❑ Talik covers;
• Agitation when emptying C7 Basin surface orals of solids;
C'1 Proven biological additives or oxidants
SLI11111t: 10.1]ili • Partial •lli,:foblal dacallipusrnoA; CI Extend drilllkpllic outlets midernuath liquid
• hlixirl" while filling; Ee�cl;
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Remove settled solids regularly
ALlm L:. slurry m slodge • Agitation wizen slltcading; (71 Soil injection of slurrylsiudLcs;
spicalf:1 oullets • Volatile gas eillissiolls ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
lncuvcicll Illaillne, • Volatile gas emissions %~•Mile ❑ Soil injection of's1mry/sluliges -
slurry Of sludve ton field drying
❑ Soil incorporation within�tS hrs.;
surLltcs
[7 Spread in thin mliform layers for rapid dryiiw;
❑ Proven biological additive's or oxldaws
Dead ikllllllalS Carcass decomposition T t-i)roper disposition of carcasses v
1)L:ad akiiukal di:posal Carcass decompusilion ❑ Compicle covering of' carcasses in Elul ial pits;
P'[s 171 Proper location/constrimion of dispoxll pits
~Iuuucl,�l�us Y llILWIllo]cic: C01111lustir 11 ❑ tievoml;Ir%, slack lutirms �—
Oembur 1 I, 1996, Page 4 1 0 9

Source Cause HNIPs to Minimize Odor Silt Specific Praclices
Standing wafer around • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
faciliucs 0 Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic mailer
I,lannrr traCl:rcl unto 0 Poorly utaiutained access roads GV Farm access road maintcrtauce
public: ruaih tiutn faun
access
Additional Information : Available. Frrnn :
S%vine Manure Management ; 0200 RuleA3MP Packet NCSIJ, County Extension Center
Swinc Produuian Vann Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; I:f3AE Fact Sheet NCSIJ - HAI:
Swinc Production Facility Manure Managerent: Pit Recllarge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88 NC -St J - I IA I:
Swine Produclion Facility h'tanure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; E13AE 129-88 NCS1 J - IIAE
Lagoon f)csign and Managetnctu for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE~ 103-83 NCSIJ - IIAE
CaliUratiwt of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSI I - HAI,
Cowfullisig Odors from Swint Buildings ; PII I-33 NCSIJ - Swine F.ytension
Iiiivirunmenial Assurance Pro -rain ; 14I'1'C hianual NC Pock, Producers Assoc
01)6011s fur Managing Odor ; a report from the Swinc Odor Task Fnrce NCSIJ Atri Communications
Nuisance Ctml:crns in Animal Manure Manatentent: Odors and Flies ; PRO107, 1095 Conn-Crencc Prucecdutgs 1=lnriila Cuolrclativc Extcnsiun
AM( W, • idwr 1 1. 191,16, l .iC.t 5

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cuttse — IIMPS to Control llrseets -Site Specific Practices
.� Liquid Systems ----- - �—�
HLJr h t LIUCrS Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids ftaul
gutters as designed.
X❑ Remove bridging of accumulated solids ;it
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids ❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and nits where
nest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no mare than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Eac usive Vegetative Decaying vegetalion Pf Maintain vegetative control along banks of
01 I)WIll lagoons and outer impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative; matter
along waler's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Syslews
Vcc.lcl., • I'celi �pilhlcc _ 1}Cslgll, llperate and ell illiatn teCLl Sysivills (e.g ,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage net a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval dltring stmlmer; 15-30 day mlcr'val
during urinler).
geed Stlnage Accunitilatlnlls of feed residues (j-"Iteduce: tnuisture accumulation within and
aronrul immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage assay fturn site
and/or providing adequate containment
covered hill Iirr brewer's grain :md similar hit;lr
�imislure grain Inwhlclsl.
❑' Inspect for and remove or break up ac:citinw tied
solids ill filter strips around feed s[ur,r};e as
rtecdccl.
Ocher I I, 1096, ]'age I

Source Cause IiAZI's to Control Isisects Si1c Sorcific Practices
Animal Holding Areas ACUnnldations of animal wastes
and feed wastage
0- Eliminate low areas tltat trap moisture along
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
/ minimal.
t3 Maintain fence rows and lilrer'strips around
animal Folding areas to miniutize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Alanure I landlutb Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Remove spillage an a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systctus day interval during summer; 15-30 day internal
during winter) where manure -is loaded for land
application or disposal.
❑ Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
* Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
mantire handlim, areas as necdcd"
Fur Inure inliOnnation contacl the Coolierativc Extension Servicc, Department of fituuniology, Dox 76 13, Nortit Carolina Sta[c l lniscrsii� ,
kalciLh, NC. 27695-7613.
i
A rd W 0hcr 11. 1996, Pate _1

• Mortality Management I lethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
J Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
J Rende-nng at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
CD In the case of dead poultry only. piacina in a disposal pit of a size and design r
approved by the Department of agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
•

fly,
Jrl4 , "I
r - I,
rill I
I,% -A.
log
-T ,A
r2AW, ;JryIm
X
I
-V A
4, 41,
cq j.V'je� 4
ld,
J61
4
L .44 N
oo
W4rk
Ar
rK
A-;:z 3"N"�-NnA"
. -to
s

Dunlow Farm Site Map
Facility # 66-19
0
Is
Office
Storage Building
O
Well

MapQuest Map Results
•
http://www•.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/ia_find?...8000atcyt&randon=1217&1inl,=ia-map-resuI t
�''� ���'ly� .fir ' �g.,•.: - raw7��uy� w e �:,;, prr,o uestn.•
rvr�:`s � :a D[�ettions• •�.�efd.:�p�=_ ,lVleirtb�Fal�fs}�"�'/ Saivica��:
Map
Results
use t':71xc11 t �-�1i;sr,R.
license/copyrightb, SHARE YOUR LIFE. SNARE YOUR DEC1SI.t}k.
Your search origin is: Gaston, NC, US
! N 1AAP�ti/�ST'"ch5f r U 45-sseami ►Map Tips
i " Sk
NW NE: pTripiet z7 ►Get a NewMap
IN
` E itchells Mirt
SW SE 'casbuFg� `l Goo .` kDhfia ►Small Map
ffxrievv
S j ° pGar ` dr nvsC ssroads ►Medium Map
L �..� r.._ .
6 6 w Stro oeit ,. -
ck o, �.t, sa- t4 Large Map
V" ra m rr,:l4e rr,aF �- 46 Best br Printing
- r 301 ►Customize Map
Cum rorksJ, tubs
..
E!,;; rr.', •- pCookysCrossasda F
��'. Recenter Map OEgterpnx rialm"o Rpa oke Rapids 1$6 ►E mail Map
y
►savekoad Map
Identify Icon ! ; 158 03 158 5o�t -Rox wy Carysburg rrernbersonly
Recenter Map u4b weidon Printable M ap
nd Zoom In 4 Rhtas.il 125 t For best printing
1 t ! result;didt here
! Gretna C;r.0 48 �'* ``
i i . _.,_- r__:___ 1 . j AMud Castle
10 190 Geo5 vste rns G b ba I Oara.: 01993 NavTech
Quick Places of Interest(,Ma3rund 8uttGw) Places of Interest (US/L•urvre onh) :
Click on buttons to show/remove the location(s) on the map. Select a category and click on Update Map:
+ Attractions ,�� Lod in
r
• ' i >" Vc, SrRog' Banks & ATMs _ Recreation ' y
members only -
Dining..
. , w# TranW sportatlon ....,
i duration ✓i Personal
Plan Lodging
Plan Dining iPtusGitytntp+, h�
Get City Info. IiAtlraciinnsT V>tttd x ` ' -� AT&T
Weather .�.
Get a New Map state /
Address / Intersection City Province Zip (for US Only)
..,i Gaston
Country
. ��e�.._..._..,. ,_:...._...�.
wiz-- . j Restore
j Maps j Driving Directions ! Plan a Trip ; Buy a Map i Free Membership j Products &Services
Home I About 'I Feedback 1 H. eln I
Copyright 1996-98 1 GeoS stems Global Corporation
17J
ON 12/30/98 2:39 MA

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary .
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Williams Farms of NC Inc
Dunlow
PO Box 416
Moyock NC 27958
Attn: Fred Cunningham
Dear Fred Cunningham:
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURGES
April 7, 1999 `
Subject: Application No. AWS660019
Additional Information Request
Dunlow
Animal Waste Operation
Northampton County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by May 7, 1999:
Please incorporate the NRCS Required Specifications into your Waste Utilization Plan
(WUP) and resubmit the WUP showing the specifications have been incorporated.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before May 7, 1999 or
the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and
your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

,3tate of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
a I,
i
RECEI'
V'JATER QUALi- - ,
"'INCDEN'
1V0rt•DrSCherge ftf6 CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
April 7, 1999
Williams Farms of NC Inc
�v�ri
Dunlow r; ;
PO Box 416
Moyock NC 27958 - - - _ _ - _ _ - _
Attn: Fred Cunningham `
Subject: Application No. AWS660019
Additional Information Request
------ - - _ - ------ _ — -- -" _ -Dunlorv- - -- -
Animal Waste Operation
Northampton County
Dear Fred Cunningham:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by May 7, 1999:
1. Please incorporate the NRCS Required Specifications into your Waste Utilization Plan
(WUP) and resubmit the WUP showing the specifications have been incorporated.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before May 7, 1999 or
the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 21-1 .0200 and
your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
r.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid perinit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
I

RECEIVED
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN `r
Nan -Discharge Permitt
Producer: Williams Farms of NC / Dunlow Farm
Location: 7 miles west of Gaston on NC 46
Telephone: [phone]
Type of Operation: Farrow/Wean
Number of Animals: 650
Storage Structure: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Application Method: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of the surface and/or
ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer
required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are required so all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in a environmentally safe manner:
® 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do
not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize,
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities. ;..
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be
applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations.
5: Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied noLnjorc than 30 days prior to planting a crop or
forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. Jf you choose to change methods in the future, you
need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application niet'hods are no the same
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility.
Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some
cases you `may want to have plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall
ade for the area receiving waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and the
type.' Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 1SA NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted
by the Environmental Management Commission.

9
X.
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
' i h
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year leallons, tons, ete 1
650 animals x 8.$ /day x 365 gal. Waste / animal Iyear — _ 2,087;800 gals, waste /year.+'
Amount,of Plant Available Nitrogen (EAM Produced Per Year
fE V
650 animals x _ 5 4 lbs. PAN /animal /year = 3510 lbs. PAN / year.
{ PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633) L;R
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the*'*.-,'
waste in a timely manner..
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER ;
Tract
4
Field
N
soil
T
Crop
RY.E.
x
N Application
Rate
Lbs,
N/Ao.*
Comm. N or
Residual N/Aom
A,=*
f
Lb,. N Uaiwd "•
Month of Application
2631
3
Tai3
Bermuda Hay
6.0
50
300
0
10.6 '
3,180
A ril•Se t.
2631
3--
Tu13
Whost- rain
50
so
0
10.6
530
Nuv.4&rch
2631
4
TuB
Comm Berrntu
a4jiy50
240
0
2.9
696
A nil-Sa it.
2631
4—
TuB
Wheat-Omin
50
5o
0
2.9
145
Nov. -March
631
1
TuB
Cotton
0.12
78
0
8
624
Ma -hula
2631
1^
TuB
Wheat-Grain50
5o
0
8
400
Nov. -Mauch
2631
2
TuB
Cotton
!65010.
12
78
0
8.1
632
Ma -3u�w
2631
2^
TO
Wheat-Grain50
50
0
0.1
405
Nov. -Munch
none
none
none
none
Totals [ 59.2 (1) 1 6,612 1
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they
must be accounted for. N must be based on-reillistic yield expgctation.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding or double cropping.
*** Lbs. N Utilized equals total required nitrogen from waste less any commercial nitrogen supplied.
Indicates that this is field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Reference is from Sixth Guidance Memo (Revision Two) issued on August 25, 1998 including a memo from Dr.
Jim Green, Chairman, Crop Management Practices for Selected Forages Used in Waste Management. (see attached
memo for suggested management practices and expected yields- and total amount of PAN/acre. )
^ Indicates that this field is being doubld cropped ( two different crops planted in the same field during the same
year). In the case of wheat followed by soybeans followed by corn planted the following year we have allowed 20
lbs. N/ac to carryover into the PAN requirements for corn, (i.e. 20 lbs. N / ac has been decreased from the corn PAN)
due to residual nitrogen from the soybean plant.

•i
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
tie 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not have adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
WWIr
®
mmu=lwx�
Totals
(See footnotes for Table 1)
Totals from above Table I & Table 2
® Table 1
Table 2
Total
Amount of N
a
a"
**** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced.'
Note: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates.:
The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or y
other elements.
Acres shown in each Feld of the preceding tables are considered to be' the usable acres excluding required buffers,
filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due E
to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres
shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste..
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that address all f,
nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
Acres
Lbs. N Utilized
59.2 1
6 612
n/a
n/a
59.2 t
6,612
Produced
**** Balance
3510
-3102
rwsanc,..u1rrrr.nM�..�er rrrerwwiue �ee�rwerwenr�ve�eew aAureRYfnelrek4ah3ni L6 .xiu+swu A-,Vd,n a .,nk k!.h W: k:-:fauea� M7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
We 3: Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field #
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate (In/1 r) .
Application Amount
In/l:vent *
3
TuB
Bermuda H°y
0.5
1.0
3---
TuB
wheat -Grain
0.5
1.0
4
TuB
Comm Bermuda Hay
0.5
1.0
4—
TuB
Wheat -Grain
0.5
1
TuB
coum
0.4 bare
I ^
TuB
Wheal-0rain
0.5
2
TuB
cotton
0.4 bare
2^
TuB
Wheat -Grain
0.5
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop
is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen
limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
.j
Application of Waste by Irrigation
ft irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or
ding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and
organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding'capacity of the soil at the time
of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and the
irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and
2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Your facility is designed for 75 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 2 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure
exceed 1.7 feet from the top of the dike.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in'determining the amount of
waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation:
Waste will applied to Bermuda hay, wheat, & cotton.
Wheat will be overseeded into bermuda. The'PAN for overseeding small grain into bermuda is 50 lbs/acre above the
normal rate for coastal. Small grain must be harvested before the heads begin to form (ref See Sixth Guidance
Memo, Revision Two, 1.11
Cotton and wheatwill be double cropped on the same field the same year..
1 Total acreage was calculated by using all waste application fields as individual fields in the same crop year, thus
reflects the total acres that may receive waste in a given year, not mapped acres. '
ortalitymanagement will be by complete incineration and ashes will be land applied to spray fields.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Producer: Williams Farms of NC/Dunlow Farm
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the routine operation and maintenance work needed
to keep this swine waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is considered to be
normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
1. Maintenance
a) The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:. j
i) Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side slopes: bermuda and fescue
should be well established on these areas. The embankment should be fertilized with 10-10-10
per acre each year to maintain a vigorous stand
ii) Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done by mowing, spraying, or
chopping, or a combination of all three. This will need to be done at least once each year and
possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
b) Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made at least annually. Items to be checked should
include, as a minimum, the following:
i) Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a) Condition of pipes
(1) Separation of pipes
(2) Cracks or breaks
ii) Pool Area
a) Undesirable vegetative growth
b) Floating or lodged debris
iii) Embankment
a) Settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
b) Side slope stability - slumps or bulges
c) Erosion and rodent damage
iv) Transfer Pumps
2. Opgration
a) Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total of 650 / Farrow/Wean. The
lagoon contains both permanent and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be in order to
ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The design include§ permanent storage of one cubic foot per
M� pound of steady state live weight.
b) The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capability for the volume of waste produced over
75 days, the amount of rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in excess of
evaporation. Your facility is designed for 75 days of temporary storage; therefore, it will need to

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
be pumped every 2 months. Begin pump out of the lagoon when the liquid level reaches
elevation 98.7 as marked by the permanent marker. Stop pump out when the liquid level reaches
elevation 96.5
c) The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan recommends sampling and
testing of waste every 90 days and before land application. The waste material should be analyzed
before each'application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of the area of application
must be made annually to insure the waste is applied as reasonably and practically possible to
recommended rates.
d) It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -charged to'/z it's capacity to prevent
excess odors during start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the
lagoon thereby reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing
odors. Solids should be covered with effluent at all times.
e) The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States.
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources; Division of Environmental
Management, has the responsibility for enforcing the law.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Williams Farms of NC
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (We) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (We) know
that any expansion to the existing capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (We) also understand that'there must be no discharge of animal
waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: (Phase print) V •lliams Farms of NC
Signature: r syive Date: 1191V3�
Name of Manager (iraitre=t &m owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: David Oldham
Affiliation : Certified Technical Specialist
Address : 414 Hwy 158
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
25 -82} 10
�'IanAtllrP.' A
❑ New Plan ® Revised Plan Date: l/19/99 ❑ Amended Plan Date
�19 ���
X1,flP

�zWA`I:
ION�PL�►N
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge
continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which
to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate
land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy of
a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application for the life expectancy of the production facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change
in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application of other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS
is used, the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per
year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the
field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Suffers" required
by DEM.
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding.
7. Liquid Waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur off site or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site
during application. No ponding should occur in order to control
conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of
application.

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered
by solids.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and
a suitable winter cover crops planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface
water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are perennial
provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than'100 feet from water
wells.
�.�' 13. Animal waste shall not. be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
�:7 other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways
or wetlands by a discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been approved
as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste
should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates provided the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain
a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year,
24--hour storm event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory
freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on
all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If
needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
Accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly
for
evidence of erosion, leakage,„or discharge.

WASTE....
UTILIZATION PLAN _�
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge,
pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills,
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site'.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all
waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the
liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years and a liquid waste analysis
be taken at least twice each year consistent with waste utilization
plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for -five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.
N
aw

l. Ak �"zt a U1,iA D
1 W_
.
tie
Av. Lr
4 jj�'V�
Awl 4.. o" "�"i
:.��Y�?�.:
1I
Ij tit �1
lk
All
-Ulf
jr
Me
X6,
Ml
A -
Will
1
- Ir 4.
VV44 L
A
mi
r5 MT.
I Ru Q RN
A
0
IF 5
gz:
N I
-102
k
. . . . . . . jq� -19 "zV..
If
j
A;4
Ul
4TI

Dunlow Farm Site Map
Facility # 66-19
J
, }
Office
Collection Box
--r� Recharge Pump
Houso
Incinerator
j -
Storage Building -T
IVcll -/ 0

apQuest Map Results
hilp://%vww.mapquest.r,oni/cgi-birL/ia—f-md? ... 800(ja tcyt&randon= 12 1 7,U ink= ia-nia p-res uh
I CA&
Map
Results
use sublect to 0)gtm 1 --r, I I it
license/co yda SHARE YOUR LIFE. SHARE YOUR DECISION.
Your searcn oriqln 18 : UaSTOn, NU, Uti
Njr P-Map Tips
NW NI"' Trip4at 5k it 0. 0 et a N evv N1 ar)
'i
4 C, (700 01
65
W __4w .E itc ells Mill
S� )�Slnall Map
W-,
S SE' 015"Atrz Min OT T FES.Mlchs 1-Mediul I Map
P46 O-Large v
L $
J rT'1 :: TJ'a� all Best for P"ritog
Gum -Forks -Forks 301 ►Custotnize Niap
op!ior, a
eelmvn_G &86 ►i�E-mail Map
Recenter Map cEQtPrFf im
Rb�.ayjae Rapids_---
jSave�Load Map
Identify Icon -.158 1 �58 lasaut Rom my C'rysburq rrembers only
�0'-
ry
ath Waldo n Printable lyll ap
Recenter Map 125 For best printing
nd Zoom In
results od h,�f e
40
NO
M Lid Ca5ile
0 1908 GeoSystamsGbbal Corp.; 0 199.8 Nav7ech
u You. m. st havethe zoom l6vel set at qA 0 n'the Map
y.leyel'. it o
Quick Places of Interest (rv[a'43rund Buliul s)' 'laces of Interest (TJS1U'Al10PL; 0111N.)
Pick on buttons to show/remove the.location(s) on the map. Select a category and click. on.Update Map.
Lod -gin Ell .2 5; Y-1O, I
r Attractions
*MJ'Banks & ATMsl-t: Recreation
e�rremm n y
4 . -Transportation
Education V✓i Personal
porlsoir
Plan Lodging
Plan Dining
=7--= AT&TGet City Info,
VLAnntoh
Weather
Get a New Map
Address I intersection city
Country
us�
�i Get MapRestore.
State /
Province Zip (for US Only)
I Maps I Driving Directions i Plan a Trin I Buy a Map j Free Membership j Products & Services I
I Home I About 1 Feedback I Help i
Cop eoSysteals Global Corpof0on
.-Yrjnht 199.6m9a I GQ -
I' 10198 2:39 PNI

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE
SWINE LAGOON
TENT S-
NAME >
W=amptonms Dunlow
" OUNTY
==_-__--_-__.._____________
- _�
TODAYS
DATE __-_--_______________-_---__>
8/27/97
SITING
LAW DISTANCES OKAY (YES OR NO) =>
Yes
NUMBER
OF PIGS WEANLING TO FEEDER
0
NUMBER
OF PIGS FEEDER TO FINISH =======>
0
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO WEANLING
550
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO FEEDER =--__-_>
0
NUMBER
OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
0
NUMBER
OF DEVELOPING GILTS
0
NUMBER
OF STUD BOARS OR GESTATING SOWS >
0
NUMBER
OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
0
(5 year minimum unless retrofit)
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL =-____> 236.0 FEET
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL =_-____> 134.0 FEET
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION ==========> 96.0 FEET
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION =W=> 93.0 FEET
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION _______________> 89.4 FEET
Depth of Permanent Water 6.6 feet
(minimum depth including sludge = 6 feet)
(maximum depth.of sludge = 2 feet)
SIDE SLOPES =---------------------- -=> 2.'5:1
Permanent Volume Required 159560.5 cubic feet
Permanent Volume Provided 170821.2 cubic feet
Iy' DITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (VEGETATED)
0
SQUARE FEET
DITIONAL DA W/O EVAP. (NON-VEGET.) =_>
0
SQUARE FEET
(i.e. feedlot & non -diverted area)
ADDITIONAL D. A. WITH EVAPORATION
0
SQUARE FEET
(i.e. pumpout pond)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE
90
DAYS
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY =-_=>
0
GALLONS
NORMAL RAINFALL FOR PUMPING CYCLE _____>
21.5
INCHES
PERCENT RUNOFF ON VEGETATED AREAS =_-__>
30
PERCENT
PERCENT RUNOFF ON NON -VEGETATED AREAS =>
65
PERCENT
NORMAL EVAPORATION FOR PUMPING CYCLE _ >
12.6
INCHES
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =------------=>
6.7
INCHES
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM VEGETATED AREAS =_ =,>
0.0
INCHES
RUNOFF DEPTH FROM NON --VEGETATED AREAS =>
0.0
INCHES
INCLUDE HEAVY RAIN (YES=1, NO=O) W-==W=>
0
(NUMBER ONLY)
FREEBOARD =--__-_--____________________>
1.0
FEET
ESTIMATED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION ====--==> 100.0 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume Needed 99029.7 cubic feet
Temporary Storage Volume Provided 103422.0 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 100.0 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 256.0 feet Width = 154.0 feet
ESTIMATED DEPTH TO PUMP = 2.2 FEET
'volume To Be Pumped = 77018 cubic feet
A
eet
top Pumping Elevation = 9G.0 feet

EiMER GEN CY ACTION PLAN
PH09 i �i� —M'
DWQ
ENLERGEVCY NIA-NAGENLEtiT SYSTEM
SWCD 5u-2sgL _
MRCS _ n4-7ri41
1-his plan will be implemc:tted in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
U 01 c. Stop all flows to the lagoon imrnediatel_v.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. I nmediateIy stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and spriniders-action include;
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from Rush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
a. Stop rec%-cle pump.
h. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make :ure no siphon oc::urs.
d. Stop .111 Ilcm.; in the house. tlu�h systems. w solid Separators.
IS. lure,
y., _ � ,. .�r. �sr.r.x,m:�-a��an�mvr,�usya�n':rr.::•; •ina;,^r":..:a: - st-.,

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting, purttps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed .0
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have it professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was rcleased and for what duration?
c. Any darnaae noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property dama2c?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office. Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-7/33-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the dcmils
of the incident from item ? above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The correctiVe
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number -
and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Departinent and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
darna'Te.
a. Contractors `acne: iv6LrRt,. s 7r7,e.as.6 674-NC
b. Contractors AJdross:_,.,cr,, N,'t-_., A-(
c. Cori(rnctors

G: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Enainetzr. ctc.)
a. Teny—f4i9vt7—NRCS
b. Phone: A I m--34 2591 ---
7: implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical :assistance agencies to
rectif•' the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
Dcceinbc: ! iCOO,

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause IIA1111; to Afiniulize Odor Silc 5l,ccilic 1'r;14:iiccs
I uu t scl Sv.inc produclion t- Vcbctauvc or wooded buffers; —
ElRecommended best nrana,-=nrent practices;
CY/Goodjud2nrrnt and common sense
animal body surGlcei a flirty manure -covered animals C7 Dry floors
1=1��or awllaica • Wet lllallllic-coveted 011111s /Slowed floors;
R Waterers located over slatted floors;
©"feeders at high end of solid floors;
2"' Scrape manure buildup front floors;
C4 Underfloor'vcntilaiion for drying
:4111L114 COUCLlion pits • Oune; 0 Freeplenl ntanure removal by Elfish, pit rechar_c,
• Partial microbial decomposition or scrape;
ft"'Underllnor venlilatiun
Vc11111alion csilauat fdm,
Volatile gases;
fzr l.au tuainicnance;
Dtlst
O"l:fficictll air ntoventcul
lnduor serf;KCN
6Dust
Washdnwft belweelt troops of animals;
n
iced additives;
0
feeder covers;
0
Deed delivery dowuspuut exlenders to fccflcr
covers
1:lusb l;tlll a
Agitation of recycled lagoon
0
Flush tank covers:
licgnid while tanks arc filling
0
Exiend fin lines to near bottorn of tanks with
anti-siplio_n vents _
1 111s11 alleys
• A6iialion during wastewater
❑
Underfluttr flush with underfloor vcntilaiiuli
conveyance
Pig IcL11.11rc poillis
• Alplation ofrccycictl lat;ono
n
Emend rCL'harUc lilies in ncar 1lontnll of puts
liquid while Ails arc filling
with anti-SiI111011 VC11B
1-ill stalluns 0 Agilation during sump lank ❑ Sump tank covers
fining; and drawdown
Olnsidc drain cullcololl • Agilatiol, dclrillg; W!1Stcw;11cr ❑ flux covers
or juntaion lulacs conveyaifce
AMCA-}- llovullhcr 11, 19116, Page 3

Source
Cuuse
BN11's to Minimize Odor Silt; Sinxific Practices
End of dralripipes at
• Agliation during wastewater
C1 Extend discliarge point of pipes undtrilcalll
Lgoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
1.Ji'Wi❑ SllrfJCCS
Volatile gas emissions;
t3-Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
* Biological mixing;
❑ Correct lagoon staritip procedures;
• Agitation
CL"inimum surface area-to-volunie ratio;
0,- l inimum agitation when.ptimping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Itrigalioll Sprinkler
0 I ligh pressure agitation-,
rrigate on dry days With filth: or no %vied;
notLICS
. Wind drift
ti'Millimuun recotnrnended operating pressure;
r/ump intake near lagoon ligpid stirface;
2 Ptuup froth second -stage lagoon
Slurabc I;uli: or basin
• Paitial microbial ticcomposilion;
Rllottom or uiilllevcl load;ng;
sklr
& Mixing while tilling;
Q 'tank covers;
• Agitation when woprylno
❑ Basin sitrfice: mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Scnlin� I�.ni,i :llrl:kee
Partial nilaohial decomposition;
❑
Exlcnd drainpipe outlets unllerncatl! liquid
•
Nixill" while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
Cl
Remove willed solids regularly
M.uunc, ,Illrry Ili siudt;C
Agilarinit when spicading;
❑
Soil injcclion of slmry/7;ltldges;
spncadcl uullets a
Volatile gas cmissiolis
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxirl:mts
Uncovered lllarnlic. &VulattlC
ails errliSSllillS While
❑
Soil lniectim, asiotry/.-oml6es
sllrrry or slutl_c tin field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
sur r'.lk:cs
Sprcad in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
Cl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
I?�.ui :nook is
Carcass dCCollipositirilt
9-111roper disposition of carcasscs
I)_a!I anilu;ll di.pus;d
Carcass (decomposition
171
CotllplCIC covering of C;VCISSCS in Inn i:ll pits;
pill
fl
Proper location/construction of dispw;;il pits
losulcr.lruls -
hicurnpfcEC conrdrilsrikmi
Cl
SvCollda(.;• slack 111urltls
Aph
At.10 nihcr 11, 191)6,
Pape 4

So II FCC - -- -- — - Cause - - - - - UNIPS to lllinimi-ee 011ur-'. - - -- - - -- - �Siie Specific Pr;tc[icc5 -- -
Staliding water around a Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that xaicr drailis
faLilltiz:5 a Microbial decomposi!ion or away from facliules
organic matter
l.la nllfc Irach:,[ unto foot ly maiutaillcd access loads Q' Fann access road uiaini,-nancc
public ruatL bunt farin
access
Additional Information :
-- -- — -
Available Front :
Swine hlamirc Managcnietit ; 0200 lWlcfBMP Packet
NCSE1, C00111y lalcrtsiuu CC111C1
S%vinc l'ruduction Farin Putential Odor Sources and Reniedics ; FBAE Facf Sheet
NCSU - BAE
S+vine Procluc[iun Facility tiianure Management: Pit Recll-arge - Lagoon Treatment ; ERAE 128-88
NCSII - I1AE
S%Yitle I'ruduct 011 Facility Maiturc. Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatuicril ; EBAE 124-88
NCSIJ - BAE
Lagoon Design and Managciuent fur Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EIIAE 103-93
NCSU - I1AE
Calibration of Manure anti Wasiewaler Application Equipment ; EBAC Fact Slice[
NCSIJ - IlAII
Cunirulling Wors from Swir,c Buildings ; Pill-33
NCSIJ - Swine Es!cnsiun
I'liviruimicn!al Assurance Program ; NI111C Manual
14C I'mk Producers Assoc
Ohtitja} lur t4anaglilg Odor ; a report Isom the Swine Odor Task Force
NMI Agri Communications
1
1 iHiS:[ t:L: C1111Cerr15 in Animal Maimrc Malla"Cll;Clit: Odors and flies ; P1'0107, 1995 Conl::rcltce ProceeAin,s
I'lllllll;l Coojwf;11ivv EXIL:11511Ht
��/
AtAc 31 - rl.Itrntbt:r ! !. 1990, Pace 5

SI III cc
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
cunse
HMI's Io Cuutrol Insects
Sirc Specifi Pl-acliccs
Liquid Systenis .
1,14ldI tiulic(s ACCrlmulation of sulids
Cl Flush system is dcsigued and uperaicd
sufficiently to remove accurnul acd solids from
gutters as designed.
.❑ kemovr bridging of accunurlatcd solids at
discharge
I.agoous wid fits • Crusted Solids
❑ Maintain lagaons, setiling basins and pits wlicie
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than b -
8 inches over mare than 30% Of surface:.
I:l,Lc»ive ♦rCL!ClatlVC Decaying vegetation
_ Maintain vegetative control along hanks of
t ire++Ih
lagoons and other inlpoLill dnients to prevent
aecumulatian of decaying vegetative ivalter
along ++'atef s edge oil impo1nkdmenl's. pci-imeicr.
Dry S)•strnis
Deal S1li11aLC aymsicil, opci. le anti nlailltaitl feed systems (c.L_, -- - r
hunkers and troughs) In minimize the
acctuillilalion of decaying waslage..
U/CI an up spill;lLr on :1 saline basis (e.g., 7 - EO
day interval daring summer; 15-30 ckty hitcival
(Itiriog +einler).
Decal stolaLe 0 Accwuulaiions of feed residues
Reduce moisture accunlula[ion within and
around imniedi:ne periincier of Eued storage
;tress b}' insuring drainage away lions silt
and/or providing adceluale C0111ai1n11Cr1[
ctimcd hill for hrewcr's f;rain and similar hiCh
noislure El'aill prothlrts),
ct/11nspccl for and lenlove or hll;tk up accinnrihictl
solids in lil[cr drills aroulld feed slola,;e as
needed.
ether I1, 109c), I'age I

Smirce Cause RNIPS to CoWrol 1115CCtS - _ — Site Specific Practices -
Auiitwl holding Areas AccunmUiarts ofanintal wastes
and Iced wastaee
CT Eliminate low areas that trap moistitre aimig
fences and other locations where xvast�
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
/ minimal.
13 Maintaiv fence rows and htrcr'strips :tretnnd
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure Ilanslling • Accumulations of animal wastes Cl Remove spillage an a routine basis {e.g., 7 - In
Systcuts day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure -is loaded for land
application or disposal.
0 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
❑ Inspect for anti remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling are;js as needed.
For mort: inliunia[ion eont;jc[ the Cooperative Extension SrrVlCC, nepar[ntew of Entumology, 11ox 76 13, North Carolina Scitc Uniccrsity,
kalciUh, MR.% 2769i-7613.

MortaIity Management IMethods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
_! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowin<<
stream or public body of water.
1 Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design -
approved by the Department of :Agriculture
J Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
mare possible the salvage or part of a dead animal's value without endanLc:rinrt
human or animal health. (%Vri(ten approval of the State Veterinarian must bC
attached)
c1c;1r11t`t'- 1.%. 1061 )

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
via
E)EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY.
April 3, 1997
Dr. Fred Cunningham, DVM
Williams Farms of N.C.
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-19
Dunlow Farm
Northampton County
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
On March 27, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the Swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with -the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
tan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NO C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

M
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
11 Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

— • V/
❑ D WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection '
outine Q Complaint [3State employee call 1317GHO •-up of DWQ Inspection © Follow-up of DSWC review
Date of Inspection - Z 2
Facility Number /
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. tithe
F�
v �y.
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReAtiv Z
Farm Statv.._.�
s:, .:.s� � ._. �.. .- �.._ or Iaspectloo (includes travel and processing) 191
Farm Name:F�q gtj}— County: 1.Z.ta.1�.
Owner Name: fdL..�dhz�jr"'S 01,_ /1/ ... Phone No: �!9 j(09� d (DFF.CG
Mailing Address: (i f (, m o y 0 c /L1. _ �?% (. � '1
Onsite representative: �Ll ✓�0/ J h r _ . Ilntegrator: ` '�`� nAw y:yY
Cerdfied Operator Name: r /d w r n V�" 6}-h=
Location of Farm:
Latitude �•�•�"
Longitude • *
Cj Vot O eratfonal Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Number of Lagoons ilolding'Ponds [i Subsurface Drains Present
r ' ram•
er: t;,',•'`:hA""'
Lagoon Area S rav Field Area
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancdimprovement? ❑ Yes [dNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes �N
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -trade? ❑ Yes VNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify 1)3,Q);,
1- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
I. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a d
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsfholding
❑ Yes VNI
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
0 Yes FNo

3 D W C An Feedlot Operat
ion Review
WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection '
outine [3 Complaint 13 State employee call 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection [3 Follow-up of DSWC review
Date of inspection 2_- '
Facility Number
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
�j Total Time (in hours) Spent onRe%•iew
Farm Status:
of Inspection (includes travel and processing) r-
Farm Name: _.__L� `� Y� 1� _„Q3 Fp s+- - -- - - County: C�
Owner Name: k3� r'r '!] r�. S ^✓3 �'�..^ S 0 r'` �_ _ Phone No: _r r 97.3 fa �13 0 C t7Ff•� t �' ` ,
Mailing Address: ,�!� r o X (l (6 0 c � � rt/• (- �'j g S-i ..,._ ':
p Y �L ,✓ lY�l C1 /.� eira f re
Onsite re rrseotative:
'9''1.
Certified Operator Name: _ �d�, ^ • ^ R'�+---
} L (' �
Location of Farm: Gti / 7 { ;] -1 &,� 1Z en A S 4-0 W 41- C.-
Latitude Longitude
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
rype of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine ' ,.
: ...:. .
:'Number . `' Poultry Number
Cattle
''` Number ;t.
❑ Wean to Feeder
ID Layer
,
Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
,; ❑ Non -Laver
Beef
F w to Wean
s
Farrow to Feeder
M k
Farrow to Fini h
❑ Other Type of Livestock
;jj Number oFagoons . Holding Ponds.` t
ii C. •' S ' y" �'
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Subsurface Drains Pruent.
b. If discharge is observed did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
M:%in1Pnanrr1irr.nmv "..7
rid AArea i
Yes
�r
Mo
❑ Yes
W "o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
LJ N
No
❑ Yes VU/Nj
❑ Yes Sd
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
M

Anunal Feedlot Operation Review
A WQ Awimaf#eedlot Operation Site Inspection
outine Q Complaint {f State employee call Q Fallow -up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review ""rf"7
Date of Inspection r'; Z - c ,
Facility Number Time of Inspection " ` �% 3 Q�� Use 24 hr, time x{
Farm Status:.... r Total Time (in hours) Spent oaRe%iew
•-- or Inspection (includes travel and processing) r
Fames Name: v-\ �\ c'1 �_� F+q 9-1,-- County- CJ d r i .�a-bJ.
' a
' f a Ys�,
Owner Name: �[ir ! ��'�1F►-S �'n�'�*-5 p�. Phone No; �l !_
MaUiDg Address: �g x r G°-�0 14 ,�i� C . � 9 rY i ' .
Onsite representative: .Dll ✓�y� Dz_J_`t /Ire — Intep�tators�°�' -�'
Certlaled OperstorName: /acj '' ^ , " LL ' '';,t
``"��5'-Ht
Location of Farm: S fo y✓ ?! C �r t �"
rc
': Latitude Longitude �• �� �..... �.l�aw t, _w
Q Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Switse
Poultry " Number h:
Cattle " Number
:''Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
Da
❑ Feeder to Finish
OF
Big Laver
Beef
to Wean
arrow to Feeder
rl Farrow to Finish0
Other Type of Livestock
Number of(Laguons Holding -Ponds. 0 Subsurface Drains Proust'-,!-_
5... It s: 71 'M ' ."`. •ruY-1 �".i'�r�'�I ti .,�, r.-. I y r 'f' .•`" l.� 68II �1"!S, r�?7 S - rsY'F4e1d Area-
- ^ - - - - - +iMM�ii•n. r r rr.r.rrir.rrr��
I. Arc there any buffsrs that need maintenancelimprovement?
Z. Is any discharge obsct•ved from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? Of yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
I. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
v
i eS
d
C7 Yes
�a
❑ Yes
Yes
{� N
No
�]
I. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoon holding ponds) require
maintrnanro-/imnrnur,, —r9
❑ Yes V[31N5
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
CQ Yes No
:j
*;T,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Williams Farms of North Carolina
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
A 4
IDEHIVR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 2, 1997
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-19
Dunlow Farm
Northampton County
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
On August 7, 1997, Mr. I3ustcr To%vcll firom the Raleigh Regional 0111ce conducted a compliance inspection of the Sill) )'ject
animal facility. This inspection is part of' the Division's ell'orts to dcicrinine compliance with the State's animal "waste
nondischarge rules.
The inspection delcrnnned that your animal operation was not disLharging wastewater into Wgters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the fcquired amount ol'ii-ceboard. As a result of the inspection the Jacilily was lound to lie in compliance
with the State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you arc required to have an approved aLmal waste
manaWnient >an by December- 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical specialist or a Professional
engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you should contact
vour local Soil and Water Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Otfiee appreciates your ccxrlleralion in this natter. Ii'you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sinccrciv
udy Cairctt
Water Quality Scction Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr, Tone Short, Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 276226-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number
Date of Inspection
/
..� �,.....,,. Time of Inspection b t) 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr .I5 mto)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and orocessinnl
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:
Land Owner Name:�i✓.:.1.�.!.9_'s., ....�:.!-5...._..�`...� ... PhoneNo:...:(... 5 6........_._............................
4 �✓'� rwob
Facility Conctact:...................................... .�xh� .................... Title: f^!SIB�C; f�¢ do � . -phone No:.. .'.33j
Mailing Address: ... (l. V_P 0 X._. L..� ?.......M.P.X..P..Ga ..........e
OnsiteRepresentative:.........................................................vC�7thaw, Integrator: :.......:........_!.
y� _..............................................
Certified Operator: _ [�( '.... 4..... P..... - 4k-•................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................,
Location of Farm: /,.L , . , v /
.................... _............................................. _..:................................... ............................................................................................................................................................... 4
... .....................................................................................................................................
Latitude =*0<0" Longitude 00�.�..
Type of Operation and Deshm Canacitv
Other
ace Drains Present
Area .Z ❑ Spra
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Field Area
❑ Yes Noo
❑ Yes eo
❑ Yes 0<0
❑ Yes ;O
❑ Yes 50'
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 1a 10
❑ Yes
Continued on back

�-
1 acidty Number:.. . �7... Z...........
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes P
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
St u t ernes (Lagoons awl/or Holding fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
00
Freeboard (ft): Structure Ir Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
, .�.. ....... ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
...........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
0 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do
❑ Yes
Id"No
any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑Yes
t,a'1V0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
2<cs
❑ No
NVas e_Applic_ation
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Of in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type GS...................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Mana ent Plan (AWMP)?�
P7*7K
❑ Yes
El No
vt/ 0 4s yQi7`!
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
; No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes
;�o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Certified
❑ Yes
o
For Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[].No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 # ? e'rc�,w:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Williams Farms of NC Inc
Dunlaw
Star Rt Box 213-M
Gaston NC 27832
IDEHNF;Z
November 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Dunlaw
Facility ID#: 66-19
Northampton County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator, The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this'requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O. Box 27687. W FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 Nvf'
C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Post Office Box 416 Moyock, North Carolina 27958
( 919)435-6930,- office [phone] - fax
August 319 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
3800 Barrels Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 276o9
Dear Mr.. Schuster,
O'A
C
y �=vtii 4
In regards to your letter dated August 234 1"S concerning
the_ Dunlow Farm. The pipes that connect the confinement houses
to the lagoon have been dug up and replaced with new eight (8)
inch SDR sewage pipe. The old pipe had continually stopped up
and a decision was made to completely replace the old system.
This project should be completed no later than September 8, i"s.
If you. have any further questions or concerns please feel free to
contact me at the Williams Farms of North Carolina office at 919-
435-6930..Our mailing address is P: O. Box 416, Moyock, NC
Z7958a,
Sincerely,
Fred L. Cunningh DVM
Vice -President
a

State of North Carolina '14 a
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor E H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
August 23, 1995
Mr. Frank Williams
5021 Morris Neck Road
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23457
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Dunlaw Farm/Williams Farms Inc,
Northampton County Hwy. 46
Dear Mr. Williams:
On August 15, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's
effort to determine potential problems associated with animal waste
disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state,
nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
Broken pipes were observed that connect confinement houses to
your lagoon. These pipes intersected with subsurface storm water
diversion lines and caused animal waste to pool underneath a metal
culvert that acts as a conveyance to surface waters. No waste was
observed in adjacent surface waters on the day of the site visit.
It was also apparent that this same problem had, in the past,
caused waste to be discharged illegally to adjacent surface waters.
In addition to continued facility waste management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically
address how you plan to correct this problem and submit a schedule
(with' dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Williams Farms Inc.
Page 2
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges to surface waters of the State are
subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate
submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste_
management plan by December1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist' or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towels at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth 4Schuste, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
CC: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District County)
Steve Bennett-DSWC

�Of WAr�94
02
t7 �
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr. Fred Cunningham, MS. DVM
Northeast Carolina Farms
PO Box 865
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Michael F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
March 26, 2003
Subject: Notice of Violation
Dunlow Farm
Permit No. AWS660019
Northampton County
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Raleigh Regional office
Alan W. Klimek, P.E„ Director
Division of Water Quality
On March 5, and again on March 13, 2003, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted inspections at the subject swine facility: The inspections revealed the following
violations of your General Permit:
The March 5, 2003, inspection revealed that the freeboard level in the waste lagoon was 19.5
inches. There were water marks on the inside dike wall that looked as though the lagoon had
been up to about the 16-17 inch freeboard mark. If in fact that was the case, there had been no
notification given to the appropriate regional office concerning this matter. Please note that
failure to notify the Division of Water Quality for certain emergency type situations is considered
a violation of your General Permit and as such is subject to civil penalties.
Your permit also states that lagoons and storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris such as.
gloves, syringes, and other such solid wastes. The lagoon at this site had large quantities of this
type of foreign matter floating on top of the water surface.
Both inspections noted that there was a hole full of wastewater located midway between one of
the confinement houses and the lagoon. It was apparent that piping had recently been replaced.
However, this hole of wastewater was at grade level and if left uncovered would allow waste to
combine with rain and possibly run off site into a nearby wet area. Please note that should this
occur it would be considered an illegal discharge and may become subject to civil penalties.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 919. 571,4700
DENR Customer Service 1800.623.7748 FAX [phone]
AMA
O NR

a
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Dunlow Farm
Page 2
There are several areas of record keeping that need improvement at the farm. The facility is in
need of a current waste analysis so that the land application activity that occurred between
February 28 and March 11, 2003 can be tallied on the IRR-2 nutrient balance sheets.
There were weekly freeboard records on site. These records did include the actual date that these
freeboard levels had been recorded.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. Your response
should include your plans to correct these matters and copies of the land application records for
the aforementioned dates. If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should call Buster
Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Z-2- Q Kenneth Schuster, E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: John White, Northampton County Health Department
Tony Short, Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

Northeast Carolina Farms. Inc.
...........
P. O. Box 865, Moyock, NC 27958
[phone] office(252)435-2387 fax
April 7, 2003
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, Regional Water Quality Supervisor
N. C. Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster,
I received your Notice of Violation for the Dunlow Farm, Permit No. AWS6600019 on
April 1, 2003. 1 will try to address your concerns point by point. Due to the excessive
rainfall over the 90 days prior to inspection we made every attempt to hold as much
waste in our pits so as to slow the lagoon rising. When we were able to pump, again we
released this waste from the pits. If the lagoon level exceeded the 19-inch mark, it was
during this release, while we were pumping and was back under the mark within 24
hours.
We are currently picking up the debris that flowed from the pits when they were
released into the lagoon. This will be completed by mid April. We also held an
employee meeting to reemphasize the importance of keeping trash out of the pit. We
will have to get a boat for any debris that is free floating.
The hole with "wastewater" has been pumped back into the lagoon. The standpipe has
been installed properly and the area filled in with additional dirt.
We have a current wastewater analysis and the records are being updated. We are
currently recording the date of our weekly lagoon readings.
I you have any additional questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
, � s VW
Fred L. Cunningham s. DVM
President

a
W M i'-§ Michael F. Easley. Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
yRaleigh Regional office
wr `C Gregory J.1horpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
April 5, 2002
MAIL
� : nfo ,_• _ 1.r!
Dr, Fred L. Cunningham, Ms DVM
Northeast Carolina Farms
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Dunlow Farm
COC AWS660019
Northampton County
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
On March 25, 2002, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection of the subject swine operation.'The inspection revealed the following:
Record keeping at this facility needs improvement. Land application records for field # 3 were
being kept on a total field basis and not according to the Wettable Acre Determination for the
facility. The WA calculations for the Dunlow Farm indicate that 3 sprinkler heads are being used
at a time in field # 3. According to calculations each sprinkler covers an area of .588 acres, or an
area of 1.76 acres per bank (3 heads). The total acres listed for field # 3 is 10.69 acres.
In order to avoid the potential of an over application of PAN or hydraulic overload, future
records should be kept according to your Wettable Acre Determination.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this Notice please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. John White, Northampton County Health Department
Mr: Tony Short, Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 919. 571.4700
FAX [phone]
NMEW
Customer Service
1 800.623.7748

State of North Carole
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 3; 1997
Dr. Fred Cunningham, DVM
Williams Farms of N.C.
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-19
Dunlow Farm
Northampton County
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
On March 27, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the Swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in.the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate -submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, Narth Carolina 27609NiC C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Dr. Fred Cunningham
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
" Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr'. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

6. A facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. bid the facility fail to have a certified o*r in responsible charge (if inspection after 10)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures sons and/or Holdln Ponds
9. is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (R): La goon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
14. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
1.1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenanceJimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public bealth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
❑ Yes �'wo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Lagoon 4
Waste ARplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
r
15. Crop type
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? tvc�f
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Onlv
24 ' -Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewi'mspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes��No_
❑ Yes 0_<O
cs ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
0 � o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #):. Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (usa additiciriat pages as necessary)
8
Reviewer/Inspector Name •_ � '
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 -1 7 %
cc: Division of Water Oualitv. Water Ouality Section. Facility Assessment Unit 1 1/14/96

di Review
[3D WC Animaee Feedlot Operation Re ie
Z7Q Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Moutine DComplaint 13 State employee call 13 Follow-up of-DWQ inspection M Follow-up ofDSWC review I
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection
Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status•: Total Time (in hours) Spent onRe%ie%-
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name:
Fo county,
r
Owner Name: op /;/- C Phone No: if to93 0 C OF,-,C e- j
Maftg Address: P,�L. 17
Onsite representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator Name:
Location of Farm. L!LAJ y (0
Latitude
Longitude 0 4
C__
f8Not 02erational I Date Last Operated: . ..... -
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
ou Cattle
;Numbe Number
Poultry r7 : ber ,Number
Q Wean to Feeder
Meeder to Finish
U'F=ow to Wean
"66
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
La:: Da'
10 Non -La -er I Beef
[I Other Type of Livestock
Ptttmber of goons Holding'Ponds13
Subsurface Drains Present
Lasoon AreaD 95srav Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need mainten=ce/improvement? 0 Yes 011N�o
0 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes pj�
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [3 Yes N
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
VNo
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes [�3/N5
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes
4- Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? C3 yes o S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 0 yes FNo
maintenanr#-Amnmvo­-&')

6. facility not in compliance with any ap le setback criteria?
7 Did the faciliry fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/0?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lalloons andlor Holdin Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes , o
❑ Yes \o
❑ Yes @'No
❑ Yes No
Freeboard (ft): L4200n i Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancegmprovement? ❑ Yes 21 o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? r..
es
❑ No
_Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
0 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
r
15. Crop type ._.... _.. r _
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? sV U/ram—
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
I9. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlmspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to question #E): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use''additinnal'pages as necessary)
8
Reviewer/Inspector Name.�t'
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: (��� B���/ Date:
3-.2?-?7
cc. Division of Water Ouality. Water Oualitv Section. Facility Assessment Unit 1 1/14/96

i
State of North Carole
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
AT4
E)EEHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 3, 1997
Dr. Fred Cunningham, DVM
Williams Farms of N.C.
P.O. Box 416
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Subject: Compliance
Facility #
Dunlow Farm
Northampton
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Evaluation Inspection
66-09
County
On March 27, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted 'a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance, with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the' Swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State —Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate -submission of a waste management plan. - -
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, . FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N10 C An Equal Opportunity Afiirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

a
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
" Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towel'l at [phone].
Sincerely,
�-
`J
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

1.
(]DSWC AnillFeedIot Operation „Review' `
Q Animal Feedlot operation Site Inspection
�j Routine 0 Complaint 0 State call 13 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review
Date of Inspection . 77-
Facility Number Time of inspection p Use 24 br. time
Total Time (in hours) Spe t onReAew• o�
Farm Status: ..._..... ..,_.... or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name:County:
Owner Name: �... �.� � ....._.....�._...._.. Phone No: ..,_.
Mailing Address; � � � �i �2.. M � o L �. C _.. _.. _ .. _ .. _ ........ _... __ .... _ .. , ...._ ....
Onsite representative: ✓r , .,y.L _. �!a.. r. Integrator:.
Certified Operator Name: !��y.._ . !:i �. �l.fv' ... .........
._ W ..._ . _.... »..._.....M ..._...._ ...� .._.....
Location of Farm:
r1a
9K±
Latitude �•�.« Longitude �• �� ��
Q Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....._.. _ ...._.. _..... _._.» . _. ......
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine '; :Number ;:` Poultry Number ": Cattle .. Number
:: ❑Wean to Feeder Laver Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish I0 Non -Layer Beef
Farrow to Wean -01) A
-
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Type of Livestock ;
Number of -goon f Holding Ponds g Subsurface Drains Present
w�
G: `p Lagoon Are- 0 Spray Field Area
_. General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes i 'Na
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes O
maintenancelimprovement?
Continued on back

6. facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes �a
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (LLagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes L/J No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovernent? ❑ Yes �'No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the stru tures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levelsVvwO+4t-j r,�,�, �- Yes ❑ No
Waste Apniication
-, 6 12-rf1041s H pkgD-W,. k4-4 F-_1 p a;4S .
/
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? [--]Yes QNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type - t S
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? n o e fA- 0-5' y,2+, ❑ Yes ❑ No
(,(..✓dY�ing(f✓�'E-f-E ji+s-�r.cf dF�iC2�fvH56iov^f �
17. Does thefacility have a lack of adequate acreage foyr land application? 3L E rib A-t ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? [:I Yes ;eo-
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/'inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Usk diawings of facilitytp.,better explaiu'situattans: (use additional pages as necessary}.
rv�c11• � I.��� /0.43 O"Z- P;At.-T, VVI
/Ia4i �(.c,,,brr� ti� �� tom, ,'—f14416V 4"" oc�w�ie.�
p • v c <rcrro.— -1 'c ,
L ,q 16, to a Z
S j, a /'w
l S e,, P.vr^V 8LAri^j-
Reviewer/Inspector None
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
I
1+
Date:
-Z7-97
..1.. nc