660007_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Division of Water Quality
March 14, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Brent Edwards
Roanoke River Outfitters
40 Sycamore Street, Suite D
Weldon, North Carolina 27890
Subject: Notice of Violation
Facility # 66-07
Edwards Thompson Farm
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
�f
NCDff�NRR
Noarf, crwouw or
Em"Rc*mwir /WD mm%n ►L Rijjce3
On February 12, 2002, Mr. Buster Towel] of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection to evaluate the status of the waste lagoons at the facility. The inspection revealed the
following:
Both of the older lagoons on site had less than the required freeboard. It was estimated that
these lagoons had only 6 inches of freeboard.
There was also evidence of considerable muskrat activity in and around both of the older
lagoons. The lagoon closest to the back of the property had muskrat holes all the way though
the dike wall.
Please note while your facility was never covered by the Animal Waste General Permit, it is still
considered to be "Deemed Permitted", and is still subject to all requirements of your Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan.Violations of the CAWMP may also be subject to civil
penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per violation.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. Your response
should include a plan to restore these lagoons back to the required freeboard level stated in your
CAWMP. After your response letter has been received, another site visit will be scheduled to
check on the progress being made in this matter.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]e
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% past -consumer paper

Mr. Brent Edwards
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should contact Buster Towell at (919)
571-4700.
Sincerely,
tl
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Tony Short, Northampton SWCD
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
Northampton County Health Department
RRO Files

P.O. Box 667
Rich Square, NC 27869
f
czar 5:.,
G.r-ti
6�kl NoT�cc-
#:-- 66-0de
U -t mr-,—
Roanoke - t
Huntin Lands
3r F d Z
r
o Vc a LJTto-�
`rL" �c S C> a -ems
'�JoV \"e"'
+I\,,- -C-0 " v
Office (252) 5---o-**tr�.3
www.roano a un ing.com
/ `( '
1( 4er- Q- V�' C C-
�-e-1^
zsz� sic-
Sri" C QrIL- r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Division of Water Quality
March 14, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
ivlr. Brent Edwards
Roanoke River Outfitters
40 Sycamore Street, Suite D
Weldon, North Carolina 27890
Subject: Notice of Violation
Facility # 66-07
Edwards Thompson Farm
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
NCDENR
NORT C^ROUM , DVV4M+e"T of
EwARONMRNT AND NATurt L RE5a+RGz5
On February 12, 2002, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted an
inspection to evaluate the status of the waste lagoons at the facility. The inspection revealed the
following:
Both of the older lagoons on site had less than the required freeboard. It was estimated that
these lagoons had only 6 inches of freeboard.
There was also evidence of considerable muskrat activity in and around both of the older
lagoons. The lagoon closest to the back of the property had muskrat holes all the way though
the dike wall.
Please note while your facility was never covered by the Animal Waste General Permit, it is still
considered to be "Deemed Permitted", and is still subject to all requirements of your Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan.Violations of the CAWMP may also be subject to civil
penalties of up to S 10,000.00 per day, per violation.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. Your response
should include a plan to restore these lagoons back to the required freeboard level stated in your
CAWMP. After your response letter has been received, another site visit will be scheduled to
check on the progress being made in this matter.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Brent Edwards
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should contact Buster Towell at (919)
571-4700.
Sincerely,
42)
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Tony Short, Northampton SWCD
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
Northampton County Health Department
RRO Files

e
State c" North Carolina
Departrnent of Environment,
Health c-.ind Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Water Qu
February 10, 199
Mr. Brett Edwards
P.O. Box 667
Rich �,=.,uare, North Carolina 27869
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Thompson Farm
Facility # 66-07
Northampton County
Dear M.L. Edwards:
MAR - ►Ti
DEHNR RALEIGH
REGIONAL OFFICE
On Fe►f.-nary 6, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
deter:iiine compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management
Regu, uLions .
Mr. "'lowell's site visit detertained that wastewater from Irour
faci.l.iLy was not discharging to the surface waters of the State,
nor ,ere any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohil:it.ad
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewat:'�-r)
obser,.< •�d. However, as a result of the inspection, the follc-;wing
deficiency was observed:
The # 2 waste lagoon had no freeboard. Animal waste lagoon:-, are
required to maintain enough freeboard so that no discharge of
wastewater will occur to the surface waters of the State during any
rainfall event less severe than a 25 year\24 hour storm.
This matter should be immediately addressed to prevent the
possi:Di lity of an .illegal discharge. Please. respond to this Notice
within: 30 days of receipt. You should include in your response the
action.s that you will take to address this deficiency.
3800,1:orrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]-
Rczlei , Norlh Carolina 27609 '�" C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Aclion Employer
Vl;i�N'Me919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
o a�

Brett Edwards
Page
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Water
Qualw°ty is required to enforce water quality regulations in or.;er
to pi--o ect the natural resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal
discharges to surface waters of the State are subject to civil
penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per violation.
This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These ;clans must be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at (919) 571•-4700.
Sincerely,
�'--OJ22
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. pat Hooper, Environmental Engineer, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RR(', Files

w
s
t }
DA Y PHONE
9191826-510
March 6, 1997
(ffAa,,A and i-PoAwPA 947Pm, Ae.
6'99
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, PE
Regional Supervisor
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster,
L MAR - 7,
f)tIlLRALEIGH
�LCIONAL OFFIrr
mi
NICH PT O E �
9191539-2459 !/
I am writing in response to a notice of deficiency I received on facility #66-07
known as the Thompson Farm in Northampton County.
My # 2 lagoon did not have enough freeboard. This is an older facility and Mr.
Tony Short of the Northampton Soil & Water Conservation is in the process of
upgrading our whole system at this facility. I spoke with Mr. Short per tele-
phone on Tuesday, March 4th and he had a plan ready to present to his district
engineer for her input. We have been applying the waste on small grain (rye)
at correct agrinomic rates to prevent any possible discharge. Wh hope to begin
construction on the new system as soon as the plans are in order.
If you or anyone in your office has any questions or concerns please feel free
to call me at [phone]. Thank you for your time in this matter.
Sincerely,
V'
J. Brett Edwards

N , ..
V v�ner nt;ency
s'
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review agoon Evaluation t
Reason for Visit o Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Z 42�Z ime:
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
13 Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or kb vc Tbrespold-
Farm Name. L d"1 County: %
z� z—�3F
Owner Name: � s Phone No: �Z 5 �G 7 yZ—
// J �^
YLf r C!� ! GC/L .2 Wb '
Mailing Address: j_,. /1�,tlKC �-✓�-iP !%u!_Fifurs JvGs��+^�"� S•�GL 7
Facility Contact:y �C'� L �� ��' �` S Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: . tt-c - _ Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm. -
El Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 1 14 Longitude 0 6 66
Design ..
Current Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Po ulation Poultry_ Ca aci "
Po�"ulation Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer I
❑ Dai
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -La er
A.
❑Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Wean
_
❑ Farrow to Feeder
i
❑ Other'
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design.,I'c
Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
I
Total SSLW
L
. Number of`Lagoons
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
EE�]_ s — -- - -
❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Tr`
aps-+,
❑ No Li uid Waste
Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o
J
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes o.. +
Waste Collection,& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:y
Freeboard (inches);
05103101 Continued

. •
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Gomnnents.(refer to question #) Explain any;YES answers and,tor an recoiinmendations o_r any oth y -om cuts. '
` F at
Use dr wings of facility to better explain slivat�ico s (use additidiial pages.as necess�arFy)
Fiel d Copy ❑Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 " Continued

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER [QUALITY SECTION TO
RRU P. U2i02
Site Requires Immediate .Ancntior
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT y
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
36 1 (/ / � DATE: 7-1 ? 1995
7 ? l e L/ y Time:
Farm Name/Owner: J cy � , q n/ C D t- }9 r J 4- / l /6 o�
(P4-7
Aml A"04-
We/ f
ve -f'
Mailing Address: -
County: r Hf±pg-
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: O*� Phone:
Physical Addressa ocation: 6 if / 1
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ �00 ° - il'Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACEDEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Ladrude: a �� �� " Longitude: ' ! y y Elevation-. Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Ammal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm everit
(approxirnately l Foot + 7 inches) Yes C6& Actual Freeboard: <_/ ___Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes Was any erosion observed? Yes o &
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No 7 is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No - 7
Crop(s) being utilized: 5tT A-i4kW4- Lkl^</
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Got No
100 Feet from Wells?09or No
r arirnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes 0
xdmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes
Ts animal waste discharged into rs of the stare by inan-made ditch, flushing system. or utht:r
;irni!ar man-made devices'C%eor No If Yes. Please Explain.
t++�5 me facility maintain adequate waste nianagament records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover cmp)'? Yes or No
✓a-,i L 6, 41 le- l� r tc-9 d .a r d r9 4- ,h - L! T�G -I r
Additional Comments: 1 _ ftiw'� _ r.,.
&vr'CYa.,cL a F twnrl e, 1'1 41, yJr,qea-,-/' F,,,/J 0,1cA xA6-f rc,�s ".1I a
L, k +4- i l4,0j0
a-g re-W 1 9 - 6 e [ i '� A
(_ 4 e
D ,r- d CJY-
Fi e v da ✓ /1Sy,vt re . 4
1l,
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
C G�
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P-22

e� y 11-14
7�SU� r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Brett Edwards
Edwards & Edwards Inc - Thompson Farm
804 Bryantown Rd
Rich Square NC 27869
Dear Brett Edwards:
A6�'r
K4 JLOA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANd NATURAL RESOURCES
January 24, 2000
019
i
Subject: Removal of Registration C�
Edwards & Edward's lnc - Thompson
Farm
Facility Number
tNorthamptan.County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, P.E.
cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office
Northampton Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

Facility Number 66 — 6 Lagoon Number....-- Lagoon Identifier digger .......................................................
O Active 0 Inactive
Waste Last Added1...19............................................
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
Distance to Stream:
By measurement or Map?
Down gradient well within 250 feet?
Intervening Stream?
Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
Overtopping from Outside Waters?
Latitude P67 17 23
Longitude 7711� 19 36
By GPS or Map? X- GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: 66a6
QA...........................
5................................
# <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
❑ Field Measurement ® Map
O Yes No
O Yes O No
0<5 05-10 #>10
0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown
Spillway O Yes 0 No Adequate Marker Q Yes 0 No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 19
inspection date 2/29/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 18
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
lication equipment fall to make contact
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes 0 No O Unknown with representative O Yes * No
unavailable
comments

'i�;.
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number:
Farm Name:....��.,.
Owner:
E)
t-j R (2 L) ,s
Mailing Address: ei5-e _13 e y�nJ�'�,1� r
Rica- S ac2 k. /�)L
County: �/C ��rNAM�o►'p�t J
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
Vout of business/no animals on site
closed out per MRCS standards
below the threshold (less than 250-swine, 100-confined cattle, 75-horses, 1000-sheep or
30,000-poultry with a liquid animal waste management system)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, I will be required to
notify and re -register with the Division Water Quality.
Signature: Date:
Please return completed farm to: DEHNR DWQ
Water Quality Section
Compliance Group
P.O. Sox 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
nn t rn7

9
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection ;
© Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
E3 Other Agency - Operation Review
1%3 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of D%VQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSIVC review Q Other
Facility- Number +e Date of Inspection
„.,..� Time of lnspcction t 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .I'ir . ./ ......... f......... CUnrlt-: .................. ...............
OwnerName: ................................................. ............................... ................................... Phone No:........,..............................................................................
FacilityContact: .................. ............................................................ "I'ille:..-............................................................ . Phone No: ......................................
MailingAddress:...................................................................................... ..... .................... ............................. ....................... ...................... ......................,...
Onsite Representative:...!. L ..... .%il,/-0 -, .............................. lnlc� rator:...................................................................-..................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =' �' Lon ;itude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste \Management System
DischarM & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach W,,tter of the State? (II yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min:'
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation`?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) ess 1 �a n1`J` vu`lV. Spillway
AAT `I`� " 1,
Sttyucturc I Souclurc 2 Structure 3 Siruc:turc =4 Structure 5
ldcntifier: PPAN /� �v-,f�� O L
hreehcrirdlinchesl: .................................................Z........................................................................................ ......
T'
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes �SNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
VNo
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
Ycs No
El Yes
3123/9sJ C(J Al�(�l'-Lj�� �1��'lu/�i�—
uc
T / f gc c)
5(� �ly�-1
Canlinned on hack

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RE EIPT REQUESTED
Bretl Edwar s
Edwards & Edwards Inc - Thompson Farm
804 Bryantown Rd
Rich Square NC 27869
Farm Number: 66 - 7
Dear Brett Edwards:
11kT?W'A
IT
/ •
2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Edwards & Edwards Inc - Thompson Farm, in accordance with G.S.
143-215.1 OC, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt
of this letter, your farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting
documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996),
Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by
the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your
application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
�xlSincerely,
l 4% • � r I •
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh_Regional_Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑
Other Agency
"
Division of Water Quality
:
i'_
-N,-:
0 Routine o Com laint Follow•-uD of DS1i'C review O Other
LL Facilit} Number
[] Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
FarmName: .... ...... h%J..�Y �L................ I............................................
OwnerName: .......................... . ....................... -......
Facility Contact: ............................................... .... Title;
Mailing Address...............................................................
Onsite Reps esetttative:.fif�.. �.1.....................Q.1M � .`....... ..... ......
CertifiedOperator.: ................. .............................................................................
Location of Farm:
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 3 r ` 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[j Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ......... ................
Count�:...................... ................ ........................ ......................
PhoneNo: ....................................................................
........... Phone No: .....................
I......... Integrator: ...........................................................
........ Operator Certification Number,..........
C
C
Latitude • Li Longitude i(
Design : Current
Scene Capacity :Population .
T
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
':•,
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation:'
❑ Yes
❑ No
Discharbe originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of'design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7nCAr7
�.

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons,liolding Ponds. Flush fits, etc.)
9, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes QINo
Structur1e-I Structure 2 S r ture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �!....�1-A &`�.......... i�� 1................ ..........
...............
Freeboard (fty................J........,......... ... `�.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste A ►pplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......................
..................................................... ........... .......... ............ ......... ...............................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
1�No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0, No.vitilations "or. deficiencies.were noted during this;visit.- Yoi 4ill receive-iio' f6rther•
" '�cprrsaspondenceaboutthis;visit:•;�:.�:.:.;.:...�.:.;.:.�.;.:...... .; ..;... .:........:...:.....

Facility Number: 1�6 O 7
Division of Environmental Management
L Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 3 - zi - 96
Time: // 0-
5-
General Information:
Farm Name: 71i -pSar� FRf _ County: Al"Po'W-J A
Owner Name: J/ f ��w� 5 Phone No:q 1izb o/
On Site Representative: Or Integrator: 8,c
Mailing Address: 10' ° 6 a x G 'V C .2 �
Physical Address/Location: t- h o F s'2 //o
Latitude: I l Longitude: I I
eration Descri tion: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Sow Cl Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder ' a
OtherType of Livestock.' Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than l ;f(?ot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Is erosion observed?:
Is any discharge observed?
U Man-made U-Not Man-"el�
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:,
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: t-15 c Lx Acreage: l
Ur W
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI -- January 17,1996
Yes Q('No ❑
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No —�
Yes ❑ No �I
Yes ❑ No �2""
Yes ❑ No,� '
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No

r
s yr
i
Maintenance
r..
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes UNo ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes U No a
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes .a No Er ---
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑,--No Q
Explain any Yes -answers: d S c.� t7 r-eQ! Ti �� /`�sc, %'�1 ,'
asl Glv.Ce-_ 40 e0,4, D . C, dz,
Sf,M Plnv cJ�.7S $vIL
ff LrJ Dw+^ s irdr ► + Itiu� 0 / �%►�!•��
T
Signature: &tI&/, „..,, _ Date: -3 - 7- t- 9L
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or Observations:
Use Attachments if Needed
AOI -- January 17,1996

BDSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
0 DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
W Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-un of DWO insnection 0 F0116W-UD of DSWC review 0 Other I
Date of Insp"tion
Facility Number E;K3
Tfine of
Total Tune tractioi whours LL
Farm Status: [3 Registe'rbd ❑Appliedldri* Piiiiiit ­5"7M-
- 7-�
J�X: .25. fbe I h rj 5 �iln)) So.�nt'oji K'ejtZ1W__
E
0 Certified 13 Permitted t-,,
d -
I r llisieian - (includes''travel and processing)
10 Not Operational Date Last Operated . .................. ..it ......................................................................... ........ ...........
FarmName: ................................................................................................................. ............. County . ......................................... ......... ...... . .. ... .. ................
Owner Name:..... ......... ..................................... .............................................. ......................... Phone No:,�!- ....................................... .......................................
z .............. .........
Facility Contact:`""`'....:":..:::' :: = ............................
...................... ...... ....................................
..
FlailingAddress: .................. .................................................................. ......... ...................... ..................... ...................... .. . ......................
0 i i i t R np V i F9 Wi �a ii cf, —.F ".. "..
.............Integrator;......................................................................................
Certified_ Operator: ................................................... ................................ ............................... Operator. Certification Number:.:..:...:........... ............
Location of Farm:
........................................ .............................................. .......... ..........................................................................................................
....................... ........................................................... ........ .............. .................. =M
La tit ude
TyPeof urren
N`Z - I�F fty
Design Curr6fitDesign sign rren &,ple,
swi.fi:­e,M :::".p:Capacity 0RR ationR
.... &Cu..
CapacityPopulation
-
I
❑ Layer. ❑ Dairy
12J
D WEedn to Feeder
eede6r to Finish
❑ Non -Layer I El Non-DairyA
q 1,1, Mj�
Farrow I
arrow to Wean
. . . . . . . . .
o Feeder
Farrow tact
M M Ob
❑Eow to Finish
Other
mft
[7- Subsurface' Drain's PFeg-efit?j9TE4_9_iFqt� -t El AIT51 IE50- iTusio-Aua, 111
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:� 0 Lago:on` 0 Spray Field El Other
a. If dischar-e is observed was the conveyance man-made'?
El Yes'- No7-
El Yes No
b. If(lischarge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ), El
2
Yes No
-R6if isc1� ibserVed­wht igthe estimated ow in ga nun? ones ,dis
fyDWQYt''*C;rA Y
cn.argepypass,a.lagoon's�sieM?'(lf`yeS; noti '
- Is there.,e:vide'nce • of past discli&& fromany part'of the op
eration?
Were
there any adverse impacts to the Siate other than from discharge.)
5..... Does any part of the. waste management system than lagoons/holding ponds} require,.,
' ma' inie*nhnce/improvement?fit, M
4/30/97 Cc6n . t I in e

Facia ty Number —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes .Ala•-•
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes -2-90
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? vVes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? XYes ❑ No -
1 1? 1..
Freeboard t �ucture Structure , structure r Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure..
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structure? 1 ❑ Yes J2<0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes eNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? clCes - ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses_
an immediate public health'or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any,,Rfjhe structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? .. .. _ _.,. _..- .._ Yes ❑ N0 _ ..LL ....
Waste Application
r— 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? - __. ❑ Yes" �10
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.. { j ���, �.U... ...,� ... :.. U N j t . v. ...............................
1".
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes No
-.... r r t ^tYt4-Si ._..,-�: .. , ,.. ,. ,:.. ..;. __ .« -- ! i. '•..;tS`ti'r.#ry'r4 .w.
17 Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?;- _..._ . _ __ .__._ _ _ _ __ ❑.Yes -�No
18.. Does the receiving crop need improvement?,'
mprovement? ;w �❑ Yes.
19.- Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?," [] Yes1'1,EjNo`TA''"s°°"
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes. A No,
21: Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes YNo.
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improv
ement? ❑•Yes ❑ No
. o
ft
. .- F ... �4 • .!S' • Z --_ . .. . ... - LI �. .M1:.1'w•. �14i+•'.fY �'. l: 1.
"iV"aiQ& kP&Ye .''1` 'ffi`"" Y^`:. (F' v......w (a, tk ,842'2 'M aifSkk$ H3S: ... • d I .r N 7
�oepts (z�tr f��qu�tion #)1xptaiu a�Y,�5 answ�rs�anfUar��ny,mme��ati�s��a�he m�r�eet
�.."° Use=d1'�wi�igs,,of facili�ybe�terexpta� s�tnat�on�� vls�addit�ottal p�ige� a� �nece"ssa +yi �; � �..a.
C?," 1 4,0 , �J��7� i-
c -e-,e C Nn-Y ' /- )I y�iti�
+`. <_c +-�.. r•j,�M' +Y+✓�9 �.tt�:o .c`•'�"i,�,^`..�.tt`1ST`a'3.'.�`"'�`.�i":�e�"3t(i?°.�S''d.3
..
r���V13'z.S�rY�i�T.xT'Y."S�W�'ia�i�+��...?i�SSJw � a.Cn 7� S-7••, taN�Y
-..,�s�r,`s��;•�'�i��..�v°,'�a';��x�..��s��a�rEe`'�.�e.-�r�y�:. � anti+
Reviewer/Inspector Name
,.. f .�Ei'e�y{_•.,'.i'•--. saw, ..» "_••�:ws-:.::..s�.�
Reviewer/lnspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Oriality. Water
'L Y Y h h N1'115011`5 i vR Oft
'4 �• .r , _ _ Date: J
A Section. Facility Assessment Unit `' x_ ,Ga''4 ' 4/30/9P

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDEIHNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
February 10, 1997
Mr. Brett Edwards
P.O. Box 667
Rich Square, North Carolina 27869
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Thompson Farm
Facility # 66-07
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
On February 6, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management
Regulations.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the State,
nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiency was observed:
The # 2 waste lagoon had no freeboard. Animal waste lagoons are
required to maintain enough freeboard so that no discharge of
wastewater will occur to the surface waters of the State during any
rainfall event less severe than a 25 year\24 hour storm.
This matter should be immediately addressed to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice
within 30 days of receipt. You should include in your response the
actions that you will take to address this deficiency.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, i
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NfiC
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Brett Edwards
Page 2
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Water
Quality is required to enforce water quality regulations in order
to protect the natural resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal
discharges to surface waters of the State are subject to civil
penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per violation.
This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These plans must be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of. certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Pat Hooper, Environmental Engineer, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Julian Edwards
Edwards & Edwards Inc -
PO Box 619
Rich Square NC 27869
November 13, 1996
Thompson Farm
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Edwards & Edwards Inc - Thompson Farm
Facility ID#: 66-7
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty,
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Since
Since
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.o sox 27687, ��
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 vflC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 5016 recycled/1046 post -consumer paper

JUL-14-1995 15.26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RR© P . 02/02
Site Requires immediate Attennior, /
Facility No. _ 7
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
3 DATE 7 ` / , 1995
7 7 1 V C� Time: �
Farm Namt/Owner. J I , n/ C D !y Kl r Jr S �" /- 19
Mailing Address:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: O- Phone:
Physical Address/Location: s tZ
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: vv ° - r��Ir or^ Number of Animals on Site;
7
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW__.._.,
Latitude: 3 ( ' �� yG '. Longitude: V Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fireeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes 0G) Acrual Freeboard: / Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes CO Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No 7 Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No -
Cmp(s) being utilized: 3 On X n-j4-W c I e � 1 -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 6or No
100 Feet from Wells? 'e or No
.`!c animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strrarn? Yes o�
:animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS Map Blue Ltne'f Yes orb
Ts animal waste discharged into �Yr
of the state by tna.n-made ditch, flushing system, or uthxr
;im;I2T man-made drnices. No If Ycs, Please Explain.
rk+cs Itkc facility inaintain adequate waste mauiagcmc111 records (volumes of n=ure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific aercage with cover crop)'' Yes or No
J
Additional CornmentS: ✓Q r L G r 4 le- F/ Cc- �// d A, J q 4 th C
et/ Cv(t d f ev111�4 i'I orice 19 T rKiS r n 1 p.
a b e (,Iile. A (�q,fc p n, cl G;r f/r�,/o✓ Ir?"i
,SLt J W4,", C _yr l
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

1f
Div: ' of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
10F Routine O Comnlaint O Follow-uv of DWO insaection O Follow-utf of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not O erational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
......rl. ""�2 —` !., CountyW..L.yj `...................................
Owner Name...... 7L... .,�.. lam- 1!'-1................................................................ Phone Not 6 .(e..)? ..................
Facility Contact: r�hf ......... Title ...... Phone No: ...................................................
............ ........... ......................................................................
Mailing Address: ? Q..� .... . y7. �!........ + . v:............ ........./I--. C-............. ............... I..........
Onsite Representative:.,.rfi.. L�i� r d _f' ... Integrator:....&q....................................................................
Certified Operator........,:' t,( .,.E �✓!`1'r` Operator Certification Number, .................
Location of Farm:
................ ............ .. ....
Latitude • 6 " Longitude ' 0' 46
❑ Layer
[] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
'
❑ Non -Dairy
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ; lv O
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obsen ed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
❑ Yes ICI N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
-
ElYes N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �No,
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No

FacilitfNumber: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? [] Yes V<o
Structures (Lagoonstfoldine Ponds Flush fits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o
Structure I S
tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: k!1.......................... ........
..... �..............
Freeboard (ft): ... 0 .........1.1 /1 44_ p )
.....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ YesFNo
o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeso
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses .
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
15. Crop type f ee...�. "S. f............................................................. ..... ..... ..............................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ���No
0
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes N
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes N
24. Were �anyad
tonalproblems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes
25. W ditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? Cl Yes No
No.viala'dons or. deficiencies.werenotedauring this:visit.- You,will receive-no-fdrtlier-.
e6enespoAdebce about this',visit:- ;