640044_PERMIT FILE_20171231

June 10, 1997
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Attn: Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Re: Old Wallace Green/Barham Farm, 48C
Facility #,:64.244
Nasfh=County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
JUN 1 21997
R,,, EIGH ,., G1, - A r.
In response to youdetter dated May 12, 1997, i have performed the following actions.
1. Lagoon was agitated and pumped, lowered approximately 6 feet.
2. Have discussed with Shelton Baker, local agent, about amending waste
closure plan. We have already planted approximately 30 acres of Sorgum
Sudan, and are waiting approval from Mr. Baker to continue with closure
plan.
Please advise if necessary.
Sincerely,
Derrill Edwards

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E E F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Julian Barham
Barham Farms
3092 Peachtree
Spring Hope, N
Dear Julian Barham:
June 5, 1997
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 64-44
Nash County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's
animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H.0217, and therefore hoes not require registration
for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under,15A NCAC 2H.0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not reach the
surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a
waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state
will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
. Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below,
you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold
numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
if Poultry with a liquid wastes stem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff at
[phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,
"CAU. JPraston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office -
Nash Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor IDEF—HNFZ
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
May 12, 1997
Mr. Derrill Edwards
4119 Sheep Pasture Road
Spring Hope, North Carolina 27882
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Old Wallace Green\Barham Farm 48C
Facility # 64-44
Nash County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
On May 9, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation.
This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to determine
compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters of the
State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiency was observed:
Your'waste lagoon had only 6 inches of freeboard which is less
than the amount required. Animal waste lagoons are required to
maintain enough freeboard so that no discharge of wastewater will
occur to waters of the State during any rainfall event less severe
than a 25 year\24 hour storm.
Your waste utilization plan states that waste will be applied to
wheat. The typical months of application for wheat are from
November to April. Your plan should be ammended so that the crop to
receive the waste will be able to take up the necessary amount of
nitrogen and also insure that no discharge will occur from over
application.
The above matters should be addressed to prevent the possibility of
an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice within 30 days
of receipt. You should include in your response the actions that
you will take to address these deficiencies.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101,FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N&P An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Derrill Edwards
Page 2
This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These plans must be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
IL Q -Q
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Patrick Rogers, Nash County Health Department
Mr. Terry Best, Nash Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
NOD\64-44

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
----Operation Site Inspection
,..
��WQ Animal Feedlot _ ,.
13 Routine Q Complaint 0 State employee call Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection [1 Follow-up of DSWC review
Date of Inspection — 9-, Y2 1
Facility Number
Time of Inspection__[t Use 14 hr. time
Farm Status:„_ �_ Total Time (in hours) Spent onRev-iew
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: /�i �►-- EJJA, 4,6 Ll '�— County:
Owner Name: ! ` J 1,K, j S Phone No:
Mailing Address: ! 57 4: 1.L” -� 2_ _jr
Oesite representative: _ D j J Integrator:
'Certified Operator Name:._,..
Location of Farm: sj� /
Latitude �•���" Longitude �• �• �`
Not 0 eratianal Date Last Operated: m .�.=�� .= 55_
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine 'Number~
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
rl Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finisb
-Number � I Lagaons olding Ponds: 0 Subsurface Drains Present
;. -_ w:.,. :.. v Field Area
. Q La ooe Area � Sora
General
1- Are there any bu$ets that need rnaiatenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2 10
Z. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes f"No
a. If discharge is observed, was the convevance man-made? ❑ Yes , o0
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2190,-
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 YesNo
3. Is there evidence of past discbarge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0
4. Was the -e any adverse impacts to the water of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ld No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require CO] Yes o
maintenanceimprovement?
Continued on back

. 7.. [Ad the utility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 111197)?
8. A:e there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures f ,a oohs and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Frccboard (h): Lagoon 1 Lawon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the smicmres need maintenance!improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Apolie nn
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type L�. _ _....__.... »_... ....._,...
r t
16. Do'the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? C- C„'-,— +-• e -,—f 3
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
Yes ❑ No
LJ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes LtSN0
❑ Yes ET No
❑ Yes ff No
Lam! Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2rgo-,
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cornrnen (refer to gtiestton #} AExplah any YES ans„wersaridlor,any)recammendahans or aay athercorrunents Y
Ilse drawings offactlit' better exgl�tn„s�tuat oas (use additional pages as necessary) '' * =j r% _•
C 11 �7�ttir� /J/�ti cm •�l w 4 ff vns Sla/c r� • tip-�s�Jp r�t-F:
{,vk)S rs } ►1 �l Z % ' 9 l] �J 1�� IZ A +q r[i1/`1� "T l 119
q iv Cil, -- 4,dr, wc; �oLu t?F W PL•c* ,� , M,211:
L /1 C L 4i j < S H-jC/! Q y r � D �� � � �-c � %� `` C ►'1 G'iC GLrq
” ` I 1 e- L- ICL / 000_x'[
( I
, J , G r� '1 J`� ` 'rU• ` Fl "I'+"Y' T V �' �}-..-c! 4!� ! �.,`,.�
Re%iewerJnspector Nam
ReviwerrTnspector Signature: f`]� - % Date:
cc: Division of Weirer Qualin-, Water Orralin, Section, Facilin, Assessment Emit
�.....i
1 L:14;91

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
tot
IL
[DEHNF=1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 6. 1995
Mr. Juilian Barham
Route 1, Box 370
Zebulon, North Carolina 27597
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Abandoned Swine Operation
SR 1919
Nash County
Dear Mr. Barham:
On October 10, 1995, Mr. Eric Fleek and Mr. Danny Smith from
this office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with waste disposal
systems.
On November 2, 1995, Mr. Eric Fleek spoke to Ms Peggy Greene
in regards to who was in possession of the land. Ms. Greene
informed Mr. Fleek that the land had until very recently been
deeded to you. However, Ms. Greene also stated that at the time of
deed exchange, she would pay you $100.00 to execute the transfer of
ownership. At the time of this letter, the $100.00 has not been
paid and therefore, since the ownership of this facility is
currently less than clear, you and Ms. Greene are both receiving
copies of this letter.
During the inspection, the following items were noted that require
action to prevent possible environmental impacts:
1. We recommend that the lagoon be satisfactorily closed out
to prevent potential environmental impacts, and to protect you
from liabilities associated with the lagoon. We recommend
that the lagoon be pumped out and sprayed on areas to take up
the nutrients. Spraying may continue as long as dry
conditions permit (no spraying when raining or when fields are
saturated). The wastewater must not be allowed to reach
surface waters (i. e. creeks, streams, canals, etc.). After
all liquid and sludge has been pumped out, the lagoon may be
left intact to serve as a pond, or the dam may be broken to
prevent accumulation of stormwater.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% per -consumer paper