640024_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
James Brantley
Brantley Hog Farm
Rt 1 Box 65
Spring Hope NC 27882
Dear James Brantley:
I 1ffl1?W'A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
itFICP
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 64;24
.Nash.County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Siatute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/109c' post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 1, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
James Brantley
Brantley Hog Farm
Rt 1 Box 65
Spring Hope NC 27882
Farm Number:ti64�, 24
4 A 0• •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
co
10
Dear James Brantley:
You are hereby notified that Brantley Hog Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215,10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone] extension 364 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely.,.,','''y d
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

' 0 Division o .Soil and Water Conservattoa Operation'Review'
- Di n of'Solt and Water C � E,! se > ! , -."'fl bt ur _ s:.�
� E , onservahon Cornpljance
rvysion of Water aft Com Hance Ins ectEon i
- 4� , p; i p tE tE' , �,�''
Other Agencyr - Opdratioh REVeeW K ` :c 1 a ; r,�r s :'y� F E:r
lQrRoutine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other �
Facility Number W �, ;„2 tiL Date of Inspection zJ
Time of Inspection tj r vU 24 hr. (hh:rn
❑ Permitted Ptertified ['� Conditionally Certified [] Registered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
3 f,�,V7 ` �," County:., .w.
Farm Name: t'..................... ............ .. �1-... " �h.............................................
�..
Owner Name:.. .!..,l..l......1.../... . n..7../e %, Phone No:.... Z:................... �2,. ............ �� ��/. . /...............
CC/...........................................................
Facility Contact:...s?..}:!'-..................................................Title: ..... Phone No: .......................................
Mailing Address: r ......... Z— .....................
Onsite Representative:.J( .�, 1 �7 �37 lC�..` Into!rator:......................................................................................
`.... ......... , .............. ............... .............
Certified Operator:....J..^ ....r .....................C.7..................................................... Operator Certification Number:..........r...............................
.ocation of Farm: 1"f t
......................I.............. ........................................................................................ rr
Latitude • Longitude r�• �° ��°
S, . 'Design Current Design CurrentDesign Current;. i3 _Ca acit PopulationwiCa Capacity Population PouCatte'
-Capacity Population,',,
can to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Nan -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other "
�11,❑ Farrow to Finish
E �! Total@Sln CaaClt�'
Gilts i, �� i,, r3F�� i Ala
atalsSLU
❑ Boars
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flowrin gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........................................ .................................... ................. I ............... I . ............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes vo�
❑ Yes
El Yes
❑ Yes 0%
Structure 6
❑ Yes No
Continued on back
3/23/44
1)

Q
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Dom'.►
❑ Yes
❑ Yes !o
❑ Yes d"No
❑ Yes 10
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
!No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
12.
Crop type S /1,.� ` „
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the &r1ified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
&No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
es
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
El Yes
No
16,
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No i
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
ElYes
OQ21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
:No,-
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
ZN
23.
Did Rev iewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
o yiolaiigns.or• deficiencies -wgre noted ifiWirtg •this visit' • :Yoir �will-recciye iid f'ui-tl F:
;corres• oricie' ' e: ab' ' f this :visit.
.Y-. � 3 3
se drawings of facil�ty to,better explain sttuainons use add�tt'onal pages ashnecessary)
d C are u 4.
��+CC di✓1 kn tii �L G' `� '1 'Y�--� `� /'ii n �'J � �% � [�� �d � � Q i � A4-'� I� � t [.. S �
[-n U I. 1 F= tnr tit% L �� d,1 ! ►'-G S ct ~+� ''? tre� �`� h C. f� �—
of .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
'1 , r,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
3/23/99

OP
Facility Number: — Z Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ElYes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes :�No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes N
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes N
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover? ❑Yes No
3/23/99

0 Di n of Soil and Water Conservation [j Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
[URoutine -O Complaint O Follow-uti of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 2 Time of lnspcKtion .30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered Certified 0 Applied for Permit' . 13 Permitted © Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..rt9.h.I.�ti'... t.C� ��JfZn- ................. County: :'l�'..........................................................,
.........q.....,.
Owner Name:.... ..:.f[.../ .�.` I1.¢.r7................................................................... Phone No:..!/.../....`.y7.i;...._,... �....................
Facility Contact : ............l..et1,. Title: ..... Phone No: .....,,,,,,,,,
..-- `e........................................
Mailing Address_:... 5�$Wa......12.1 .......... `r/C...Z .?? . ..... ...
Onsite Representative: ................................. Integrator: ...... rvrd.; ... _/ .............. ........ .................. .......
...........................................
Certified Operator;.....,, ... Operator Certification Number; ....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude �•.�� ��� Longitude
_fi
Design Cur"rent Design Current �a Desiga Current
Capacity ;Population tPoultry
�;.:
Capacity Population Cattle tapacety ,Populatmn
�. Wean Feeder
U J ❑ Layer
❑DairyFeedeo
Eto
Finish
❑ Non -Layer
10 Nan -Dairy
❑ Farrow. to Wean
El
❑ Other ���_
Farrow to Feeder
❑Farrow to Finish
=e,
`£`Total De'stgnf Capacity
t
Gilts
v
s
El Boars
7 �L
Tata1 SSLW
•
Number Lpagoo / HoldingPonds1 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10Spray Feld Area
P
101 iL
k '�€ N M m ti EF• .T F} k#€.L
; 0No
htr ,'
Liquid Waste Management Syste0111,
�`� V
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes fdNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Zo
'
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N[ N
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

tli�re lapons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes No
runt t QWL& ldinn lao ids, Flush Pits, etc.)
9.' Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ff No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identilict'; .................................... ................................... .................................... ................ ............ ....... ......................................................................
Freeboard 01): ,.....(....
..Q.................. .................................... ... . .................... I........... ...I........................... ............. ......... ............ ........................ ... ...........
10. Is seepagc observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes D<1
11.- Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes !� "O
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yea .'o
(If any of tluestions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Ls r
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
..%...�.,'�..f......I.-.....
15. Crop tYP� ........ ...... .............. .
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certitie or PMlitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?'
25. a any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
No.viotations or deficiencies were; noted during this: visit..You.will receive no further
' coeri s*)nden& about this:visit.
❑ Yes L9'110
❑ Yes ��i'o
.....................�iO
...........
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 13
❑ Yes X
[Ell Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes !!!❑ No
p y YES answers an or anv recommendations or any other commentsi h
Cot'nments(refer to question#Ex latiaan x
�.�
Use drawings of fncihty to better explam.srtuatt�ns (use additihnaf pages as nccessay) ,� �
;..
x
AIL
7/25/97
't `3 Z'".$
4 L/
cYtur Name
Reviewer/InspLC
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ZtJ

sw L
�� � / r l., a-7►ll. a�A ��i a �: �, �wav a. wi Y.. ..a a.a Sava. aa� r a.. �. - �'
�{ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspectlon��:i
'� � . �iw a�^n`�s��: � t. � �., . ", s ° '�` � ' �r,'b.: a< ° � ,a.�,� µ: �e ,"^w� r, �'� �i�'.: , � • � � f �:
Routine�e O Com taint O.Follow-u .of I}W. inspection :%O Follow-up of DSWC review ,-O
Date of Inspection
Facility Number`
Time of Inspection Emm 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin traction of hours
.?arm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.I?5 for 1 hr IS min)) Spent on Review
Certified � ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
113 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
FarmName:, .................................................................................................................. . .......... County: : ..........................................:..................................
OwnerName: ...................................................................................................................... Phone No: ..................................................... I..........................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title: ...... ............... .. Phone No:
MailingAddress: ................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................
Onsite Representative: ... F!,./.L. ......... .L:.......I.... Integrator: ...............................................................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..................................
Location of Farm:
...................................... ............................................... :................................................ ................................................................................................. ...............
....................
Latitude Longitude �• 0� ��a
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement`?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes j6Nc
❑ Yes ER'�1c
❑ Yes16
❑ Yes O' 'r
❑ Yes ON
❑ Yes EfN,
❑ Yes 7�N-

;ilityjhot `in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes./ No
Id,the factltty foal to have a certified operator to responsible charge? . _ ❑ Yes No
°Are there lag 5ns or storage ponds on�site which need to be properly closed? ' " ❑Yes No
tructures_(Lasoons and/or Holding Ponds
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
........ ......a...... ...... ...................................... ........... ........................... .......................................
0. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
2. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ,.0No
Structure 5 Structure
.................................. I... ............................
❑ Yes FfINo
❑ Yes WX0
] Yes ❑ No
3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Vaste Application
4. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess Ft7�
or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
5. Crop type ..........t ....(.. F-fil..u.1� A .............. I .......... ...........
6. Do the receivin craps differ with those design td e Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
- I N Qo ZIG 0 i" lid
7. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
S. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
9. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0. Does facility require a follow-up visit.by same agency?
1. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
or Certified Facilities Only
2. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
3. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
4. Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes/:�No
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ Yes
ZJ No
❑ Yes
J"No
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12 ,
Jr 67rhau�tiG
?2E�5 O�ctn ,�i4 Fo�,�J . �UE��7 7-v tvroE�i) %E�ti1EXr�
44/J
Arm
v5 160 x
E64I UK
j
�� m up
5 �� �t GG.� I /L)
-qi9 y .- A)o i

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
ti
Facility Number
Farm Name: r�
On -Site Representativ :64 4-- y
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Je-�
Date of site visit: Zr/
Date of most recent WUP: Z
Operation is'flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: ( '7•6J_pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6, stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and DZ/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part li - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map. r2- w c/
vY+�
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required ;
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Revised January 22, 1999
` pity Number
art III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBERS 2 IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
/ I
I
I I I
I
HELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWtv1P
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be cfearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of Its total acres and havinc received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and rriust be accessible.f
by irrigation system. /-

.1 f f l.. .-y f.aa a 9..a — ..:..... a%y.. ., — —, —1."— -- I •I ,,
Routinev-1-::0 Complaint -.UO,Follow_u .of,I)WQ ins ection,� O, ollow-u of DSWC-review 4-O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection Enl:n 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
.?arm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex-J.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review C
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:..............................................................................
FarmName- ............................................................................................................................... County:...,..........................................................................
OwnerName............................................................................................................ ............ Phone No:
Facility Contact: ........................................ ............... Title:............... .. Phone No:
MailingAddress: .............../....j...................,...................................................................�........,.......,..,......,...................,........................................... ...................
Onsite Representative: ... K,,./...1 .........8ff.4x//�-,.e�.L........1...... Integrator: ...............................................................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ................. . . ......................................... Operator Certification Number:.................
Location of Farm:
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Latitude •
«
Longitude
Tvpe of Operation.
Sw ne Capacity I'opulatton;
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
y: ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
'> ❑ Other .....
Layer
Non Layer
apacity pulation
Dai
Number i f Lagoons 1 Hgldtng Ponds 'I 1 [710 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Mschar, e originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If' discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If dischar-e is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. 17oes discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (I f yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
=4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than front a discharge?
❑ Yes A�N,(
❑ Yes (,ic
❑ YesxNa
Q Yes 0.*Nc
❑ Yes ON(
❑ Yes EfN,
Ely e s 4111

Is facility.not,in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes�/lJ No
Did the facility fail to -have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
-'Are there lagoons orvorage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? '❑ Yes':/No
tructures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Stntcture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
.......... 4... :�7.......... ..................................................................I.......... ............................ ...................................... I ........ ............................
0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes Al
o
1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNO
2. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? 'Yes ❑ No
Vaste Application
4. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes/�No
(If in excess of MP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
5. Crop type .......... L:.s.....i�.. v. ............:................................... ......... .................. .................. ....................... . ........ .......................
6. Do the receivin crops differ with those design t t he Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? El Yes ONo
Ofr
rV
7. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 6 No
3.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
J 'es
01111,
9.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
0.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
;j"No
.1.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
'or Certified Facilities_ Only
2.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
3.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
l� I wAi i ItiG- 1
6CEmovitiG-
j,s. A c'emUp A
Yv G/,— Ph.c�� a-- 3 y,�5GGt�
7/7EES O'X ,L 061Ai . .vE�'D tyro 6-,j)
piwD - AXGW
� 67/IK1 (JG - Ad Ga J.vG ,g,U y� � T"7�} Tc tl F- L,
S 'P6'� 4C GI N tiJA _ ill 0
+ com Pk 1 c wv&- ,eiq�- &-

�(] Di n of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency r ,
ivision of Water Quality
k
Routine 0 Cont o laint O Follow-u ' of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Insp, ction
2
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0eclertified [3 Applied for Permit'. 0 Permitted 113 Not O Date Last Operated: •„••
Farm Name: .p2a9..ft. I . ........d•!'..%..... �9f2�+-...................................... County:_?Vns...ky...........................................................
Owner Name:.... ` l �. ,�.�.9 7J.Q �7 ............ Pho No:.�l ....... .i3.......y .` ............................
/� .L
Facility Contact': ............ .1�•••�1. �.,............................................... Title . Phone No:
..........................................................................................................
Mailing Address• JlS �$ �a �•;• �/ d 5'�r%n / 2 � . r� �� �l/C 0 7
...................... .......... ....-�t'=�.......... ........ ,p.:...... 1.................................. .......
f R L
Onsite Representative:....1�..`... ..................... ..... Integrator:..... `f..:.../..........................................
Certified Operator;....... k:. I l 0 r p ..A ..................
L................'4...............'7................................................ O erator Certification Number.....................
Location of Farm: s' /Z / / S
y.
..........................................
Latitude •:' 0 « Longitude • 0 ��
`.'Design „•.Current Design Current Design Current
SwmeCapacity'
Population ' 'Poultry ` Capacity Population . 'Cattle K w ,Capacity Populahoa
❑ Dairy
EFe
❑ Non Dairy
n ya.
3:
otal:.SSLW
�Numhe� 'a oo / Holding Ponds
g g. �,
4 M R J..
❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area
ID Spray Field Area
Y
6 h`uCY
"
q
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System n5
;<
FeederU❑Layer
o Finish❑Non-Layer
o Wean
x �; �.... >°<,�. •v r
❑Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑Farrow to Finish'
��• �k °� TOta� 4Des�g
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? - ❑Yes o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ;'-No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon .❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes'
'Ll N •
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (IF yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes � INN4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the Stale other than from a discharge? ❑Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons holding ponds) require [3 Yes Z
• maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in' effect at the time of design? ❑Yes N
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes No
7125/97 Continued on back

f
Farilif} Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons,Itolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes C, <No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):.............. Q.............. ........................................ ........,........,.........,.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes : 'o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes
Waste ;'Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WM,P[, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 1..'16`....rl.. F_fC.2r...�%!k'...!3..'..'t.............................................................................................................................. ....
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes No
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does.facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?'
25. Wxfe any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
E No.violations or deficiencies.were noted-dur.ing this:visit.-:You.will reCei've no further
correspondence about this.visit.,'
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
CO Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25197

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
P?3A
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 10, 1997
Mr. Bill Brantley
11504 West Old Spring Hope Road
Spring Hope, North Carolina 27882
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 64-24
Brantley Swine Farm
Nash County
Dear Mr. Brantley:
On April 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the Swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
lan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, ow FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NO C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Bill Brantley
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
"Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
Individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Mr. Patrick Rogers, Nash County Health Department
Mr. Terry Best, Nash Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

Date of inspection
Facility Number Time of inspection J Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: _ Total Time (in hours) Spent ooRe%iew r
f or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Nam �l' a4n 1 � I r"fl rLh� County:._ '`�� _
11 . 1 � � f /i%' Phone No:
Owner Name: .b ' � Ay
Mailing Address: ��0 U es eLd 5?r W 6 fZ'D �J /,r b /4y
Onsite representative: ' r f $ ^'t'Q Y - - Integrator. C�►r G ' l � S
Certitted Operator Name: U ` �7r' �" a't
Location of Farm:
Latitude •� Longitude �• �' ��
10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
of Operation and Design Capacity
Number : >'. Poultry Number .Cattle Number
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
w to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
a w to Finilh
�ELa ; Da.
Non -La er I Beef
❑ Other Type of Livestock
Number cf goons Holding Ponds Subsurface Drains Present
0 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
eral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
L If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? Of yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes ICJ N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes

did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)? ❑ Yes
8. ke there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
c res a ons an r oldl d
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes io
Freeboard (fl): goon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
P C7
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑.Yes No
11. Is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ag r"'
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvetnent? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
cKes
❑ No
Waste Application
-
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
Ergo-
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type �t 5C4"-t , C,r�i. ' bJ A-
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? it/ d PI41- }'
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Leo ,
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
2<0
For Certified Fa ilities Qniv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to, question #): Explain any YES enswire n and/or any recommendations or any. other comments.
Use drawinp of facility to better explain situations: (use'additional pages as necessary): ;.
8
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviwer/Iaspector5ignature: ��_ �� Date: Zl
cc. Division of Water Oualir . Water Ouality Section. Faciliry Assessment Unit 11/14/96
es !1 �.. f

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEF.HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 10, 1997
4=
Mr. Bill Brantley
11504 West Old Spring Hope Road
Spring Hope, North Carolina 27882
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 64-24
Brantley Swine Farm
Nash County
Dear Mr. Brantley:
On April 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the Swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
detignated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101, !' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NZ 4F C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 a% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Bill Brantley
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
"Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Mr. Patrick Rogers, Nash County Health Department
Mr. Terry Best, Nash Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
�r

❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
W AnJimid ' Feedlot Operation Site ins
Y Q
...... -. : pection
RX-Routine o Complaint 0 State employee call E3 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 1
Date of Inspection Y-
Facility Number Time of Inspection J Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onike�dew
Farm States: _. s �'_.......�......_.... _...r.._..._ or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: fir A --19a—h— County: `».._....
Owner Name: ' r g-���,G-- _.... __ r Phone No: ! /9
Mailing Address: 5,4 iJ ds W 6 ,f� 59 9 /f
Onsite representative: !C rI �' ^' t_ .. _ .._.__._._._.__ Integrator: Ckir _�r s.....�
Certified Operator Name: _ f7/ �1 n a /2 I. t _. _ ...._. ... ............ _ .. _ .. ._..... �........._ ..._ ...._..... _ _ ...
Location of Farm: / % y /LJ
Latitude k .1•Q'�" Longitude 6 4
Q Not Operational J Date Last Operated: .... _ .....r _ .._ _ _ _ r .__ ._._.._ ...._ ..._ .. _.... _.... ............. .
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Nuttiber, `s Poultry Netmtier Cafl a Number
Eff Wean to Feeder u ❑ Layer 10 Dairy I
❑ Feeder to Finish Non -La cr Beef
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish ❑Other Type of Livestock
-14uiniier,'44 goons Holding Ponds l Subsurface Drains Present
oon Area 113 Spray Field Area
Gem
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
s. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? Of yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4• Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes I(_! N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
0 Yes No

' cility nol in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
,did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)?
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures a oons and/or Holdin Ponds
9. Is structiaal freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): 2Lagoon 1
r a
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
❑ Yes
, o
❑ Yes
Yes
;(No
❑ Yesgr<o�
Lagoon 4
Waste r\ lication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type I-4 5 e sy � rY _ ..._.... _ _ _....�.. �-
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? `t! dp�41- yl"4—
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Onlv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the An.imaI Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
Comments {refer to question #):. Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Llse drawings, of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as nece
ssary). Y
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes
U'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 01'
❑ Yes ;Z
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
-, Tom- �,,r ... , -
Reviewer/Inspector Name C['- �s,�%; ; �
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: _ �� Date: G� �j `� 7
cc: Division of Water Ouality. Water Duality Section. Facility Assessment Unit
es !l
I
11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathon B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
James Brantley
Brantley Hog Farm
Rt 1 Box 65
Spring Hope NC 27882
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Brantley Hog Farm
Facility ID#: 64-24
Nash County
Dear Mr. Brantley:
� e s
QIEHNR
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 ; CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10°k post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 14, 1996
Mr. Bill Brantley
Brantley Swine Farm
Route 1, Box 65
Spring Hope, N.C. 27882
011*
Awn% 00"ftwooft.-I
[DEHNR
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Brantley Swine Farm
Facility No. 64-24
Nash County
Dear Mr. Brantley:
On August 9, 1996. Mr. Kirk Stafford from this office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection is
a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems
associated with animal waste disposal systems.
Mr. Stafford's site visit determined that wastewater from this
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the State. No
manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the
purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) were observed. It is
the understanding of this office that Mr. Shelton Baker of the Nash
County Agricultural Extension Service is working on the animal
waste management plan.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection please
contact Mr. Stafford at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
_Ta.e/ 4.
Judy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, Borth Carolina 27609 NO C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

w
Faciliry Number:
General Information:
Farm Name: 9 (-L (A.
Owner Name:
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations PeiVisitation Record
Date:
Time:_ N ��' A)
Z
County: h 1
Phone No:�}-
On Site Representative: JE2 u ! l2 KA U7 - "/Integrator:
Mailing Address i] ------— 9 N
Physical Addre
Latitude: 1 I Longitude: 1 1
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
a Sow ❑ Layer 0 Dairy
❑ Nursery Z D a ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
Feeder
OtherType of Livestock Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:�(include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: `�,� Yes ❑
Is seepage observed from the Iagoon?: a pr Z Yes ❑
Is erosion, observed?: Yes U
Is any discharge observed? Yes ❑
C1 Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Co ver Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑
(list the crops which need improvement
Crop type: Acreage:--*R
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling Iocated within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI -- January 17,1996
No 6�
No
No
No �Y
No
No
Yes 0 No Lf
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Does record keeping need improvement?
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site?
Explain any Yes answers:.
�S
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
Yes ❑
/,�-
Signature: Date:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
]2rawings or Observations:
NoE�/
No�
No v
No ❑
A01 -- January 17,1996

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 9, 1995
Mr. James Brantley
Rt. 1, Box 65
Spring Hope NC, 27882
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Hog Operation
SR 1145
Nash County
Dear Mr. Brantley:
On September 18, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith from the Raleigh
Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts
to determine potential problems associated with liquid waste
disposal systems.
Mr. Smith's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the State.
In addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in
compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by
a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For
a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District.

Mr. Brantley
Page -2-
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
H:\anicpl8
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FRUr1 DEM WATER DUALITY SECTION TO
RRU P . ld2/b2
Site Requires Immediate A rEtmi0r,
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
r,( ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISTTATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: S 1V f-G /2�
MaalingAddress:
County: .�
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: 6 3
Physical Acidnessfl acation:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: . +�d_0 Number of Animals on Site:
DENT Certification Number: ACE DEM Cera icadon Number: ACCNEW
Latitude: �56 Z ' S " Longitude: " O ' 512 Elevation: _2-u/O Feet
Circle Yes or No
.Dot-,s the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) or No Actual Freeboard: Wit. .Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or,d�To�Was any erosion On ed? Yes or�
Is adequate laud available for spray? es: No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? ee No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or
It a^imal waste stockviled within 100 Feet of US'GS Blue Line Stream? Yes
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(9
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by tztan-made ditch, flushing systeua, or usher
;irr:i?a.r man-made de vv ices? Yes or Rio If Yts. Please Explain.
7-)l �cs the Faility xaaimain adequate waste managernctir .records (vv es of manure, land applied.
spriy irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)`' Yes of
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.U2
5