640011_PERMIT FILE_20171231

2r- (1
1 � DivisionT7"o'f�pW.a'te"r Res'oairces
Ift - lugiru 11uui�
Facility Number (p - O Divisio�n�of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency,
type of Visit: Co ance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Zeason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: -;(0-1 Arrival Time: ,;� � Q Departure Time: r'Z D County: Region:
Farm Name:` i ✓' 4,rd Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Current
Design
Current
Design Current'
Swine
Cyya�pacity
PupW.11
Wet;Poull�feYYr1lIy
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capr�ac�ity
�op.
Si��{m
IMii
�4�11
din
xu�f11N1�
Finish
La er
Dai Cow
o Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
to Finish
Dai Heifer
to Wean
ro
Desi;n
Current
D Cow
to Feeder
DPOolt .
Ca aei
Po
Non-Dai
to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
1
Turkeys
j
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
I
10ther
ilENl1:4f44ENi44Y44
�
lut€9iNWuvl.nnlwf R31A4at rd4e�pMIb4E[}E€6€n4.14uMd€9i€€}iyl.txlrk£t€<F
Wluuu.MriuE34Yb%ii
tE1€ikliiilExY.lih PeSe%1€.Ilnnlurl4a€y1dSlb3ngpllin333€93f3illn4ni€€ii€f
Dischar es and Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
❑NA
❑NE
❑Yes
[]No
❑NA
❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

'F'acili ,Number: Date of Ins ection: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): [i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
0 NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta re , notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
e_i' M
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
NA
❑ YesV;EJ
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste T ansfer ❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspection ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

�FacifltyNumber: -Z4 jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
4 Loje'S %Y Yrzs, I tc'a I e k_3 t 4v e_ ba e eie—J 4oww o
ff
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1bu S J'00 `7� k �'
Page 3 of 3
Phone: � 1 ( 791 Y 7-o 0
Date: -� `,A a I U
2/4/2015

-77— 1 0) 1
(Type of Visit: 0 Com ce Inspection U Operation Review {) Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Z 0 Departure Time: ® County: Region:
Farm Name: Jzg4 CI.y pr I a Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Bach -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder ]Non
-Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current Dry Cow
Dr. P,oult , CapaeltvP,o . Non -Dairy
Layers Beef Stocker
Non -Layers Beef Feeder
Gilts
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Zj <Noo❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: ,
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesFNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Ficility Number: - ( Date of Inspection: ld - 24 -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Po
NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
7 2 e/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental rest, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 13 er ," a C/
13, Soil Typc(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�rNa
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes r/_TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes V(No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes 17No ❑ NA D NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [n o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: [Date of Inspection: le5 - 26 —f
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
"' c NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yeso
;_N"❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments to., question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or anyi6ther$comments y e':
Use dirawtngs of; cility';ta; better explain situ. atian"s, (tise additional ages as kt ecessary):: k ;► y ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 3c(54 &�e -� 42_
Page 3 of 3
Phone: G! I' l i 5 /- i/Zr6
Date: /Q • 2 e -r
21412015

`Type of Visit: 0 Com ce Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ® County:
Farm Name: '.GAL � A Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity
Pop.
Cattle C►apacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
"on -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
C*unrent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dry P,oult . Ca aci
P,o .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
HPullets
Beef Feeder
IR-11'Br—dCow
Boars
Other
ITurkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes VNo,.,
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ A ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili ty i'Qumber: Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �f t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeses No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No CO NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes XNlo NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ✓ t.,. 4A-,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
21N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Z0,❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 1f yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facill dumber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate vraste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JCJ "' NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document D Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
D NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use'drawines of facility to better, explain situations (use additional paaes as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q�
Page 3 of 3
Phone:q 71 (. Z-o-o
Date:
21412011

r Md
Itype of visit: �v t-omq�tanee inspection v operation xeview v ntructure Evaivanon u i ecnmcai Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emermency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: = b�( Departure Time: 1 / 3 !�/ l) County:
Farm Name: 20- Z CA Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current t Design Current
Design Current
Swine
C►a acit Po'EN
Poultr. Ca aY PWean
to Finish
r
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr.. P,oultr, Ca aci P,o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Non -La ers
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
�sa�rs-eBarsisr�...
vx�®s.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes❑
VN NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
/- /
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
6 ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes PA-0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats two the integrity of any of the structures observed? [:]Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes lNoo NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
ZNo[:]
l L Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): _ r n- 14
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VN ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
KN
❑ NE
18. Is there a -lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design [:]maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall InspectieN_L
ludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: -I Date of Inspection.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No -NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations'or`any other comments.
Use' Ydrawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
� � 0 r' 4 W � w, r-4-1 Pe r-m i
Reviewer/inspector Name:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: /} (f
2-66
Date: ( 2
21412011

'q-r7-13
(Type of Visit: RICom ce Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1ZJ I Arrival Time: Departure Time: �--1 County:
Farm Name: C 4t'din a�i(� j Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: IZA 4. t(I - Title:
Onsite Representative:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current Design Current
Swine C►►opacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er I I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
11
INon-f-ayer I
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design C*urrent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. P.oultr. Ca aci P,o ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
DischarSes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes 0 <No❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �/(o
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ YesVNo❑NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNoZD NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?,0/
I I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
U. Soil Type(s):
--
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
t6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
RNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspecti;�No6o
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus toss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Eno ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations .o,r any�Mher comments.. ; ,x
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Jo.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7 l/ — y2 D 0
Date: & l 4, L
--
2/4/2011

Date of Visit: / // Arrival Time: I Departure Time: County: r Region:
Farm Name: E/-1, 'AP -C Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity
Wean to Finish Layer
Current
Pop.
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
C*urrent
Pop.
Wean to Feeder I
INon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design
Farrow to Feeder Dr, P■oultr, C+_a aei
Farrow to Finish Layers
Current
D Cow
P,o
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [] Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Ins ection:
Wakte Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes E]IN—o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes )21�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes J ' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 12-�40
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes �3'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate
Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes j2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes E]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
JC2,No
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes �' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
/2
❑ Yes "No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. T
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [] Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes JZ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: /
24., Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
E]"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
FZ� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
'�TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
'PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional.recommendTtioif bnany,other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain.situations(use_additionai pat;es.as neces`sary).: . (
Reviewer/Inspector Name: v v 4"t
Phone: q/q 79l' i°LoC-
Reviewer/inspector Signature: ^—�'A,�1 Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

f
Type of Visit PICompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit j© Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: r+ = 3� Departure Time: County: !" 64 Region: &(/4 h
Farm Name:-�1nrY I�P'� - Owner Email:
Owner Name: AIL ��+ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: C
Facility Contact: Z�ga �r R $� Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =o =1 = Longitude: =o =, 0
Design
Current
Design Current�e(,
Design Current
Swine Capty
Population
Wet Poultry, Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers d
Catap�acllRty Population
❑ DairyCow
❑ DairyCalf
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ we to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Qther
❑ Other
❑Turke PouIts
❑Other
uctures:
Number of StrIN
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
JD -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

n
,r Facility Number: (-y — // Date of Inspection l2{�7-io
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
P3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Z(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Z"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? f
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application`? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes ,O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ,allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Elm
❑ NA
❑ NE
.�. - 'iyaSfe�.t,�rE�^; 3,Sw�liird'.3i�ti ei;�i.5i _ ...
10111
omme:
Cnts (refe o��questiont#)� E plainya y YES answers and or anykreftA nAd tion, or any other commenis.
Use drawingsr�of fpaciiityxtyo(tiettekr expla�nysituations. (use'add�s%tional pages as n¢ecess�-
1-�'.. tiwJ�' _ 5YF % '��7 =Y: A'Ni d $�IIzT�h�''�231 y.. E-�.'. - V4
Reviewer/Inspector Name �f G §" ! Phone: 9��`�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: �'Y — Gj Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes B'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes j2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
P'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
P-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
jZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
9-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
F,�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional__ Comments and/or Drawings;"
Page 3 of 3 I2128104

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 `r6 arrival Time: TT-ToDeparture Time: l i:00 County: 011 Region:
Farm Name: '-� . Aer`j cy Y CI-41 Owner Email
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No. -
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e 0 1 0 {1 Longitude: = ° = 1 = "
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
C•att[e
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10
Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
[INon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Layers
ElBeef Stocker
❑ Gilts
Non -Layers
[I Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑Pullets
Beef
❑Beef Brood Cow
❑ Ts
Other
❑ Other
❑Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Rio
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
,21'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
BNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
J;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ;3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): P"�PPh
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
,0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
,0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health: or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`? ❑ Yes
�3`&o
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
ID -No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
1 1 • Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
,0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
JTlo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
• IJ.Y{ 'l•J'k FA CS} l 4. �'� '�.� N�fl0E o`.i+ij;l � +"l/ .. �'�`+`
C mments (refer to)qucsttonV;#) r,Explam�any YES;answerssand/or�any, recommend€tt�ons•or any other Comments.
a,' ,
Ii �Us.11e dr��rr.mgs&of 1'ac>>nJt to?hettcr ezplya¢¢in s��•tuatt$$o'nsi: (use additional pages gags necessary). -
4, �'a±'i.� t .<d iV i �''�S$P: Cy-1'5. :F Y'�F !t 5. '; .. 3j 18' ._F_ �V i
Iry
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 91 F— 7F1"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 6' Y— /! Date of Inspection
Reuuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [--]Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22,
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
_No
❑ NA
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ON
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
2JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EYNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
O—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
/❑~No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Add h nul Comrn is an'd/or}Dr wings `�� '. , . ,g ,h
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit "Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 'Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1�f Arrival Time: dC Departure Time: County:
1 r Farm Name: J0fe 4"as. �e^�I _ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative::
Certified Operator: 9,—yi1f - A e""r
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: I Back-up Certification Number:
Region: LLB
Location of Farm: Latitude: = c = d 0 rr Longitude: = ° a r = r6
Design Cunt
gn Current
Design Current
j' @ap acity
Population
Wet Poultry
C>acity Population
Cattle Capacity Popu
to Finish
rOWean
❑ La er
l73ao0
❑ Dai Cow
to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑ DairyCalf
r to Finish
❑ Dai Heifer
w to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
w to Feeder
El Non -Dairy
w to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
s
El Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
❑Turke Poults
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ,ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes AD -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ,'NO
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes �D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

f
Facility Number: }� — Gb Date of Inspection FT I ilelT
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
,❑"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
F::�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 C1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
0-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes P-iqo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the sluctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application r
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes ,t'I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
9'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑No
❑ NA
❑ NE
tiCUommintsY(refer;to,question #) lEzl�n'YES:inswers-and/or4fy i66-f�YI"tnls o� 'at�nyotheI }J rumm. me' �npan
edrawingsofaciEttyto betterexplans�tuahons fitts..-(use add �tional"pagesasnecrsary)r:�:
Reviewer/Inspector Name �, / 1
Phone:
, p �,,
Reviewerllnspector Signature:
Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

r'
Facility Number: 6' —rlI Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes JTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EYNo ❑ NA .❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
,ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
12No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
Eallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
,❑'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
5 '&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
12rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
V11S
1.7
/6/o 9
x,f"
2.7
1 &/a C' &'Ckr', 7?
J IL
Page 3 of 3 12128104

1j—c
Type of Visit dO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint O Fallow up Q Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1 0-70 Departure Time: County: Region:
E
Farm Name: f'` CtW 4 1 /Z. _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator: 46ft::, _
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = 6 = H Longitude: 0 ° = d =
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Cap,y Population
Wet Poultry Cap.&ty Population
Cattle Capy Population
El Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
El Dairy Cow
El Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
El Dairy Calf
El Feeder to Finish
❑ DairyHeifer
El Farrow to Wean
Dray Poultry
El Dry Cow
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non-Dai
El Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
El Beef Stocker
❑Non -La
El Beef Feeder
8Gilts
Boars
❑Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Elers
Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[3 Yes
El NA
0VN
El NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
El NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
El NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[IYesrN
[INA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104 Continued

Date of Inspection
Facility Number: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ) <<
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
21 No _NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental thre t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
El Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Vo ' NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
< ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
6410"❑ NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]�€O Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
(N0NA
[I NE
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes❑
��O_18. NA
❑ NE
Y5 :3. r., az....,._s. ,, v ...
tghons: (use additional page
Reviewerhnspector Name Phone:
T
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 21 Z-
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

r
Facility Number: (o — Date of Inspection L v
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Desi n ❑ Ma s ❑Other
❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
g p
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
7No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Weather
Rain InspectioZNa,
Code
22.
Did the facility Fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ElNA
ElNE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
El Yes❑
VN NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0410Z [3NA
[INE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
ElYes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings 3
�/ t7 31 dS` y n (j1rPn� G 77 5 .
Page 3 of 3 12128104

dint
Type of Visit �Compii a Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: L T' e: L42D Printed on: 7/21/2()0(
of Operational Q Below Threshold
ermitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................
j V Farm Name: ., ,(iwiw ... Q`... .0....................................................... County: .............................................................. ............
......
OwnerName: ................................................... ................ ........................ . ........................ Phone No: ..................................................................................
FacilityContact..................................:............................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress:.................................................................................... ..........
Onsite Representative : ............ ................. ................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................
Location of Farm:
Integrator :...... rl/1 ....................................
Operator Certification Number: .....................................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a 4 it Longitude 0 9 C
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer p ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts LL
❑ soars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I❑ Subsurface Drains Kj!!entjj0 Lago•nn Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed From any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. II" discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
ci. Does discharge bypass 'a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Spray Field Area
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Wki%te Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ;
Identifier:
❑ Spillway
Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes .�
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ,�
❑ Yes
Yes-�/
Structure 6
Freehoarct (inches):

Fac" ility 1 umber: Date of Ivspecdon - Printed on: 7/2i/2000
5. Are -there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ YesJ2fNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an 0/
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application) []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type41�n/ �. !
13. Do the receiving crops differ with th a designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes I�
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
1.8. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. -Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'s10 yiolatigns o�- dr~f enci.. i...... . dirratng h}s visit: Yost ... . . . . e .. ;
corresofidertce. about this visit. • - • - • -
❑ Yes 7NoYes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
�es ElN
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
� 1I11
A
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature -
MR
Date:

Type of Visit 9'C;outine
pl a Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
F ty Number Date of Visit: 0 0 P
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: G'.. %.r: !.....i` t... ......Po ./.71 y...... r ................. County:.......... WX.........................................
Owner Name:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Phone No:
Phone No:
..................................................................................... ..........................
Integrator:...,..........................................................
Operator Certification Number:
.ocation of Farm:
A
w
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
[ Ca iN
ac Po elation Caeac�i Population Currenign Current
Swine Poul Cattle c� Po" ulatton
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
ayer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total . .
' _ Design Capacity ,
TOW SSLW,
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ................ ........................................................................•
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
❑ Spillway
Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes .l�o
❑ Yes fNo
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o/
❑ Yes VTNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued on back

FacilityNumber: 6 Date of Inspection (/ 2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ yes o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding [IPAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes jNo
12. Crop type r.+�l vi o�.A , S enl r'ra'n—s-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N
23. Did Reviewer/Inspect ail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility re re a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0
25. Were any ditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes o
�'�1Q ' iQlg i�gs'o�. d0rjcjeneies rare P4ted• O(`idg tMs'vpspt! • ;Y;o>j� %vj1 j •teeoiye go fp�tbor . .
' riesuoridence: ahauti this :visit......: ..:::..:..::::............... .
A
f '�,d P ' ,-'f i i ' ^��g�+ i �F ° a3 t = ti ti
i + r I F iti�" s i? li f S; its s� y i{{ i t 4z. to
Reviewer/Inspector Name i< a r a , ' t:€ �i:II .'�, : :..., {tfe (_,.:.i }..,, `� . , € �.. si, E';. � .. i6 ' f . `i�€ ' rs �i, ��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Facility Number:6 Date of Ittspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ;No
o
28, is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, El Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes J—zr�'
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑Yes o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes o
l Ad(HUonal l-omments ancuor-urawrngs: r .> ,J.
qr
5100

I'
of
of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection O
Time of Inspection t7 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Ij Permitted [3 Certified [] Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..0 ' .................. ......................I...................
.� �....?.....�!.........�:'?`.f.��--.......................................... County: �� ...
Owner Name ,S'' -e. Phone No: ...
Facility Contact: ... s 11.+� c......`.....�........................................ Title:.................................. Phone No
MailingAddress: .....�1.. . �.t? ...... f .... .� "+trz............... .. ..................................................................................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ....... ! s J!h Integrator: C' .�„
......................................................................................... ............. .......... ..... ...
Certified Operator:....... .. w. f�........................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
.ocation of Farm:
i
. .. .. .............. .......
Latitude Q=•®' 0" Longitude ©•= ' R-771"
Design ;° ;Current
Design Current ; ' _, �„Design` ' Curre`nt
capacity:I
Po' ulation ,; 1'oulE
,
Ca aci Pa olatio� Cattle ; 'i Po ntahon t `
Layer
po- ; ❑Dairy
a,
�.'
•; ❑Nan -Layer �,� ❑f Non-Dairy fs�
S� i:3
>"� .. .'.'.. :: ..
{ 1
tl 1 t I'i <:.' .I ..•-:. ..<, >.'...,. 1 Eir.l C41
a
❑ Other
hi
EI I I
Tatal Destgn
dCapacity,
E4
�'
€`;4
Total SSLWil"
iNumber of Lagoons ,j
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area r
f
• 1
= Holding Ponds % Solid Traps',
s�i
I ❑ No
•
Liquid Waste Management System 1
3
[]Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made'?
b. Ii' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..........
...............V............................................ ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes o
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection rT
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N[ N
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ;40
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops dif r with hose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'Vo yioiatigris'or• dtficie dire were noted• il>�t•ring thls:visit= Yoii 'Will reegipe Rio fut�thr~tr
- corres• orideiice:abaitt'this visit: •
. ...........
. ... ............... . ..........
Use drawings of facihty� to„better explain situ
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Of N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes
A6
1W
M
Reviewer/Inspector Name'G_ IL = t `� .; , �� i Ott? , s�
...1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �� y T

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes W<O
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes VNo
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ;�No
34. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) El;N;
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'? ❑ Yes No
ittona onnnents.an or' rawmgsi �`, i'�i,fl, y 4r°�E*
3/23/99

0 D' Sion of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
10 Routine ClComplaint O Follow-up' of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number � �
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered VICertified [3 Applied for Permit © Permitted © Not Operational Date Last Operated: •„••
FarmName: ..E..A1 —1. ............................................... County:..,.1/...14....................................................
OwnerName :..,.....4i....^........!!�4.!.......:........................... Phone No:............................................................................
............ ............ ...........
Facility Contact! ...........5h-. ........ . Title: .................. .. Phone No: ...............
Mailing Address: 3 D 1�'"` }� I`7i 12� ........... I ................ ..........
ter G
W ' lAOnstte Representative: ..� n .... Integrato€%. .l.. %I
...........................
Certified Operator--:., ......... ,-- w Q.......................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
LatitudeLongitude
3, Design Cur"rent•..
4 " •Design Current r Design Current
Swore .r
b`,
Gapactty ;Papulatioti
Poult Capacity l?opulatipri Cattle Capacity : Papulatton„
❑ Wean to Feeder
ayer
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Non -Layer
1
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to- Feeder
❑ Other
`v
❑ Farrow to Finish'
Tatal Design Capacity M
El Gilts
fir` .
x
❑� Boars
�Totai:SSLW C
x
-
. .
„ ;Number o agoon '
aiding Ponds,.`
❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110
Lagoon Area 10
Spray Field Area
o No Liquid Management System
a �
J a
r
General
Y. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d= Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3, is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes l
❑ Yes EdNo
❑ Yes (�
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;10
❑ Yes
❑ Yes VN
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

FacilAby Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Na
Structures (Lai?oons,lioiding_I'onds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ......... 3.-A...................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes Nu
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes i\'o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 'o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate: minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 1 ro
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes 0<0
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ... 1(livv� sl �1 .,.. cF N^. �'..! •SDI .5.............................................................................................................��N
..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes I
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes c o
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes zo
For -Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yesf
24. Were additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes o
25. ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes No
No violations or deficiencies. were -noted during this visit.-.Yoa.W'ill receive no farther
correspondence about this.visit'.• .
�omnents `(refer to question #) .Explain any Y1H S answers and/or any recommendaUans or any athe�ycnmments x 4
'bona! pages as necessary}tom *y.
Use drawtn `s of factht to bettcr',ex lain situations use addt * F
z ,
7/25/97
Name
nspector Signature: M J/.jy�CiL[ Date:

14D Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection /0/z/w 1 Time of inspection 10 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered ® Certified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.WIN... ,....!OuLT..R.Y....,fAR/'1............................. Coanty:„✓•9.Si........................................ .......................
Owner Name:.. .....l?EIDPhone
....................................................................... ... 3......' 37.2...............................
FacilityContact:............................................................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
Mailing Address:..................................................................................................................................................•.....•................
............................
QC 3�
Onsite Representative:..........................................................................----•..............._............ integrator:..............._. ......---..... ..Q..�� ..... ?+ Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certitication �Number :.........................................
Location of Farm: ` - CF
Latitude =•' 066 Longitude • 4 "
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes Qi No
❑ Yes ,1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes I@ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/1 5/97
❑ Yes ® No

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
5tructur Lagooms,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etcj
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....�° 1...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ............ ...................... .........................................................................._.....................»..................,..........................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste l�ica_tiLm
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........ a.,..... ;L.0....................................................................•...................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
® No.violation's -or' deficiencies we're,rtoted during this:visit.' You.will ikeiveiro tirttie_r:
:. coeresoondeke aiiout this:visit:,'• :: : :
f{ 4-,� r,.....{( fief ., batjcr/•eve, of /aloe., .teeo0 fo de
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewerfluspector Signature:
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes JjNo
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes IS No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes GNo
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Ej No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7125/97 r
Date:

e:g,�
p SWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review � ,5 � u
Animal Feedlot Operation Site InspectionK.
��
M�::&'
outine _ O Com saint - O l: ollow-tj of f)Vl' ins ection O .[ ollo,- -up of DSIVC review
Facility Number
Farm Status: 0 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ...............
FarmName: ...........................................
Owner Name: ........................................
Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for I hr l5 min)) Spent on Review 0
or Inspt:ction (includes travel and processing)
...........................................................................................................
County:... .... ........................... .....................
....................................................................... Phone No:...........................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title Phone No:
MailingAddress:..................................................................................................................... ...........,........,................................................................ ..........................
,L
Onsite Representative:..... ,..Y1� •U.r.......... :� .}'................ � �� .... Integrator:..................
Certified. Operator., ................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.................
........................
Location of farm:
t........................................................... ................. ............................. ................................................................ .................................................�.............................................t +
Latitude �' �� �:� Longitude • 4 �4
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes '[?No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes (� No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes 11 No
b. Itdischarge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes T 0
c. if dischanve is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify I)NVQ) Cl Yes Eplio
3. I; there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [:]Yes I�TNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �TNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes , ' No
mai ntcnance/improvement?
4/30/97
Continued an back

r
Facility Number: --(—
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures laa oons and/or Bolding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Stnicture 1 Structure 2 Stnicture 3 Structure 4
.............................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste ApplIcatitfn
14. is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes XO
❑ Yes g(No
❑ Yes 911<0
❑ Yes ONo
Structure a Structure 6
Crop .�r?i�
1 S. Cro e ACEA...............................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewedlnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For -Certified Facilities Only,
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
1 N1 Lq) 1) P
1"J . C �[f
C.1 �'l. ,�-. � � C-. f��- rl y� (t � � �� � �1 } ��'` �r�' � i if 4+` 1��•�`��'
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes VNO
❑ Yes PNo
)zYes ❑ No
❑ Yes VTo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes U1 No
❑ Yes VNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ Yes Q(No
❑ Yes VNO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:,
Date: 1 U
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Uirit 4/30/97

RRO P.02/02
T"I-14--1995 15:26 FROM
Site Requires Immediate Attenticre-
Faciiity.No. C' /,
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANTNIAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS Sal" VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �'" , 1995 F
Farm Na
Mailing.
County:
Integrator:
On -Site Representative:
Physical Addresaocation:
DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
Phone:
Phone:
1�
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _4(690c2-_ Number of Animals on Site; Ct %
DEM Certification Number: ACE- DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:Longitude: ' _ " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
.Does the.Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxirnately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes orG Was any erosion observed? Yes or6
Is adequate land available for sprayY �Y2k7, or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes. of N
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria' - 200 Feef from Dwellings? e , r No
100 Feet from Wells?...' er No ,
4: _` e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(
alwnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS' Map Blue Line? Yes oroa
Y; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing systein, or other
•,imi;ar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes. Please Explairt.
7)ocs Ffic facility inaintain adequate waste martagerneut records (volumes of ruanure, land 'applicd,-
spray "gated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or .
Additional .Comments:
AV
4
Si arure
cc: Faciliry Assessment Unit j' �. 1 se Attachriie's.if-Ne�6&
TOTAL P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
naturafesourcs Raleigh Regional Office -
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Edwin Reid
7302 Watson Seed Farm Road
Whitakers, North Carolina 27891
Dear Mr. Reid:
now%
NCDENR
NORTH C ROUNA D � OF,_
EHVIRoNmm }' ANo NAneRAL R"ouRcF-s
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
COC AWP640011
Nash County
On April 18, 2002, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Officeconducted an inspection
of the subject poultry layer facility. The inspection revealed that the facility was not operational
and that there have been no birds on site for several years. The inspection also noted the
following:
Record keeping at the facility needs improvement. Even though the facility is currently not in
operation, your General Permit and Certified Waste Management Plan must be adhered to until
such time that the waste structure is closed according to NRCS standards and specifications.
Your General Permit requires that weekly freeboard levels be recorded and kept with all other
pertinent documents for you facility. The inspection revealed that there had been no weekly
freeboard records recorded since January, 2002.
Please note that violations of the COC and General Permit may be subject to'civil penalties of up
to $ 10,000.00 per day, per violation, and in some cases up to $ 25,000.00 per day.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerel ,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash Soil & Water Conservation District
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

,. 13/ `
ANIMAL WASTE D'iILIZATION PL�`
Producer: EDWIN REID
Location: 7302 WATSON SEED FARM ROAD
WHITAKERS NC 27891
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Layer
Number of Animals: 64000.00 bird
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to, maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure thast it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
,1..• blway%apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
jr6wn an'd the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per -acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
RECEIVED I DENR ! DWQ
Aquifer PmtertEon Section
n�
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .021.7 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, €t3, tons, etc.)
64000 bird x 25.373 tons waste/bird/year = 1623872 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
64000 bird x 0.084 lbs PAN/bird/year = 5376 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

--�_� � � ����w r. v..a. aaa• ara a a�vYVMs.7n
TRACT'
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LES
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
'
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3891
1
NoA
BH
6.1
305
0.00
1.79
545.95
T
APR-SEPT
3891
1-1
INOA
1
1SG50.0
150
10.00
11.79
189.5 MAR
3891
2
BH
6.1
JNOA
li
I
1305
10.00
12.27
1692.35
APR-SEPT
3891
SG
1-2
jNoA
ii
150.0
150
10.00
12.27
1113.5
SEPT-MAR
3891
3
BH
6.1
INOA
li
I
1305
10.00
13.51
11070.55
APR-SEPT
3891
SG
50.0
1-3
JNC)A
li
I
150
10.00
13.51
1175.5
SEPT-MAR
3891
4
BH
6.1
INOA
I
1305
10.00
13.93
11198-65
APR-SEPT
3891
-4
SG
50.0
196.5
JNOA
ii
I
150
10.00
13.93
SEPT-MAR
3891
5
BH
6.1
jNoA
I
1305
10.00
13.77
11149.85
APR-SEPT
3891
SG
50.0
1-5
JNOA
I
1
150
10.00
13.77
1188.5
SEPT-MAR
3891
6
BH
6.1
INOA
li
I
1305
10.00
10.74
1225.7
APR-SEPT
3891
SG
50.0
1-6
JNOA
I
150
10.00
10.74
137
SEPT-MAR
END
z
TOTALI5683.55
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-____-
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N•
TIME
END
TOTAL10
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
50
1.0
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
16.01
5683.55
0
0
16.01
5683.55
* BALANCE
-307.55
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 3328 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 16640
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 55.4666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 133.12 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 2515 depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of Land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
3891
1
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
2
NoA T
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
3
NoA
BH
6.50
*1.00
3891
4
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
5
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
6
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
"1
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
-2
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
-3
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
-4
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
-5
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
"6
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the, recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRUIVE OF OPERATION
Pages 9

"I-,
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page. 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIQNS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 50 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five ( 5 ) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:EDWIN REID POULTRY FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: EDWIN REID
(Please print)
Signature: } Date: "
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)J. Edward Long
Affiliation:Nash Sail and Water Conservation District Phone
No. 919-459-4115
Address (Agency): Room 107 Ag. Center Drive
Nashville NC 27856
Signature: Date: /4�
Page: 13

9 JUL 14 2014
,2 �wwl►®
NCDENR NC DENR Raleigh Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
July 11, 2014
Edwin Reid
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
7302 Watson Seed Farm
Whitakers, NC 27891
Subject: Permit No. AWI640011
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Nash County
Dear Edwin Reid:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
In accordance with your March 25, 2014 permit renewal application, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Permit issued to Edwin Reid authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system.
You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to zero until such time as the waste
storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished to maintain it as an active
poultry farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Edwin Reid Poultry Farm, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
annual average of zero (0) poultry layers.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and replaces the COC No. R
AWP640011 dated October 1, 2009. You are subject to the conditions of this permit until the closure of
all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a letter to the Division of
Water Resources to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure of all
containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Please be reminded that as per Condition H.13 of this permit the facility must have at least one of
the following items at all times: (a) adequate animal waste application and handling equipment, (b)
a lease, or other written agreement, for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a
third party applicator capable of providing adequate waste application.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per Natural Resources Conservation Service
(MRCS) Standards, a 100-ft separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone] Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmalive Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

In accordance with Condition II.17 of this Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4) hours of
the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a
Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National Weather
Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.gov/er/rah/
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Regional Operations Section Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional
information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations
Branch staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Thomas A. Reeder
Director, Division of Water Resources
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
ateigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
O Notebooks
WQROS Central Files (AW1640011)

J
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL POULTRY ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED TO
Edwin Reid
Nash County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Edwin Reid Poultry
Farm, located in Nash County, consisting of zero (0) layer poultry and the application to land as specified
in the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
1. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with NRCS Standards and
does not result in a discharge of waste to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the
Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches surface waters or wetlands resulting from a
storm event more severe than a 25-year, 24-hour storm, it will not be considered to be in
violation of this Permit, as long as the Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this
Permit.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 213, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAQ and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.1013(1) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility..

5. Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case -by -case basis by the Division.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
5. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land, or prior to the
next rainfall event, whichever occurs first. This requirement does not apply to no -till
fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels arc to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.
Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.

10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
lb. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Pernuttee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
Land application of waste shall cease within four (4) hours of the time that the National
Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a Flood Watch
associated with a tropical system including a hurricane, tropical storm, or tropical
depression for the county in which the permitted facility is located. Watches and
warnings are posted on the National Weather Service's website located at:
www.weather.goy. More detailed website information can be found on Page 2 of this
Permit. Watch and warning information can also be obtained by calling the local
National Weather Service Office that serves the respective county, which can be found on
Page 2 of this Permit.
is. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.

N
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REOUIREMENTS
An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.
2. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years.
4. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended
laboratory sampling procedures, a5'close to the tiine of application as practical and at least
within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall
include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
5. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record
the off -site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
6. If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 10. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.

e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis.conducted as required by
Condition III. 4.
7. A copy of this Permit, the Facility's permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.
Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
9. The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
10. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands.
b. Any failure of the waste treatment and disposal system that renders the facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating, or storing the waste and/or sludge.
A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting waste or sludge to the land
application field which results in a discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands
or an event that poses a serious threat to surface waters, wetlands, or human health
and safety.
d. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage-pond greater than or equal
to that required in Condition V.2. of this Permit.
Failure to maintain waste level in a lagoon/storage pond below that of the designed
structural freeboard (twelve (12) inches from top of dam or as specified in
lagoon/storage pond design). Note that this notification is in addition to the report
required by Condition Ill. 10.e above.

N
g. An application of waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters ditches, surface waters, or wetlands.
h. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands or any discharge that poses a
serious threat to the environment or human health or safety.
For any emergency which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. In the event of storage capacity violations as
described in Condition III.I O.e, the written report shall outline the actions proposed to be
taken to restore compliance within thirty (30) calendar days. The requirement to file a
written report may not be waived by the Division Regional Office.
In the event the waste level in a lagoon/storage pond is found to be within the designed
structural freeboard, the Permittee shall file a written report to the appropriate Division
Regional Office within two (2) calendar days following first knowledge of the
occurrence. This report shall outline actions taken or proposed to be taken to reduce
waste levels below the designed structural freeboard within five (5) calendar days of first
knowledge of the occurrence.
IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
1. The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, ground water and air quality

standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation:
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25-year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if. (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
NRCS NC Conservation Practice Standard No. 360 "Closure of Waste Impoundments ",
February 2008 or any subsequent amendment, the containment basin shall not be subject
to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a letter to the Division to
request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure of all containment
basins. • ... . . . .. . , , , , .
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.
4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit.
5. This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
7. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111(c). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.

2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
3. It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the l I th day of July, 2014,
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
for Th((vIas Feeder, Director
North Caro ' a Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the. Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AWI640011

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Edwin Reid
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
7302 Watson Seed Farm Road
Whitakers NC 27891
Dear Edwin Reid:
16TV?WA
17 0 0
A&4 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
JA N 4
�LLEIGH J�EG
.�.....,:_.�__ `-.,,� �lL'1:iL OFF,
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 64i 1D
ENash'County,---3
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any .State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel ,
.�
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

t Division o and Water Conservation -Operation Review{ ` 2 ��, 9 ¢'•
Ej D' on of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of ,Water Quality -Compliance Inspection
er,'A enc
g cy Operation Review I
f
E
122toutine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q follow-up of DSNVC review Q Other �
Facilitv Number IT�te of Inspectim)
V "mime of Inspection D a 24 hr. (hh:mm}
[3 Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certifier) © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 1 ..Nl t..n.... I.( ..... ,./�,C (......`' f ............... County:...........................................................
Owner Nance: L. 0 G. i- aj j Phone No: ZS ? (-......................................
` ............................................................................................................ ........�.........`�...... Z 3 Z
Facility Contact: .title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: �30 7- .•C..tTSr1�--iC.�� i-�t2+�._ 21,s.....C....,...�.............. ..........................
i.............. ...........................................
Onsite Representative: L � .... Inte-rator: L��°.h..........................................
.,j....... ... ................. ..................... ........... ........
.
Certified Operator:,L N-li, � "r'e- r. _ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
...................................I.... ...............................
Location of Farm: 5/?-, 6 '0 C)
Latitude ' C 'C Longitude • ° IL
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poult Capacity Population
Layer Ma
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
FDairy
Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Fietd Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Diseharires & Stream Imoacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon ❑ Spray Ficld [-]Other
a. [f discharge is obscrvQd, was the conveyance rn,rn-tnadc'?
h. II'discharge. is observed. did it retch: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. II discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/thin"
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than frorn a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structut'c• 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .......�Fl`L...................................................................................
1 /6/99
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Continued o\bac

—I t
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes o
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint) ❑Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑ Yes ;;Oz,
'
16. Is there a luck of adequate waste application equipment'? El Yes
Required Records S%, Documents "-<
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily availahle? ❑ Yes :1No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes jN
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify region, ,DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, f oard problems, over application) ❑ Yes
23. Did Re ' wer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
24. D s facility require ,follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
No:violations .[ir. deficiencies .were noted. dlurin .this• yi.si.E.. I'.ou vvilfretceive nor further. ::: :
correspoaidertce: ,both: this Visit.: :... .... .:..:
Comments (refer. to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any;'recommendaI ions,or any.oiher, comments i {
Use daw�ngs'of,facility to Better explain situations. (use additional pages as, necessary):
ReviewerlInspector Name
ReviewerA ns pecto r Signature:
Date: y/ 13 Yf 116199

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number (rf -<(
Farm Name: 1) ,^ rzc���
On -Site Representative: e,. ti 1
InspectorlReviewer's Name: Lrye'l(
Date of site visit: %&/ zf/
Date of most recent WUP:/ 0 `off
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 1 gibiiity item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determinatio t this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: 3 o 7-LE-5--pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: and -hose traveler; center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanen ipe; . stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun systejn,w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Dpteiirmination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART Il. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits feld(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised January 22, 1999
y Number-7
,t III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of fieid numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMSERI - must be ciearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

v
0

(D Y.r
State of North Carolina
r Department of Environment ILT15VA
and Natural_ Resources IT 0
` Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor WL
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 8, 1999
Edwin Reid
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
7302 Watson Seed Farm Road
Whitakers NC 27891
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWP64001 I
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
Poultry Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Nash County
Dear Edwin Reid:
In accordance with your application received on February 3, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Edwin Reid, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with State General Permit
AWG300000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Edwin Reid Poultry Farm, located in Nash County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 64,000 Layer and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and
injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWP640011
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
Page
If any parts. requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days. this COC shall be final and
binding.
Tile subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office, The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Dianne Thomas at [phone] ext. (reviewer phone).
- - Sincerely,
I
MAR 1 199 uJ
A Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Nash County Health Department
l t: h x nal Office W dtdr Oualif� Sedtiod
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
THIS FORM A Y BE PHOTOCOPIED e Permit Application
USE ASANorm OkICINA )f AJ JV Fo
General Permit - Existing Liquid Arrimal Waste 0prf� ions EcrioN
3 i999
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on fitbMtthe Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which a Spft gate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible.v t leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Edwin Reid
ti 1.3 Mailing address: 7302 Watson Seed Farm Road
City, State: Whitakers NC Zip: 27891
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-443-2372
1.4 County where facility is located: Nash
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From exit 150 on I 95 West on Hwy. 1500 and
approx. 5 miles on the right.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): /
1.7 Lessee's I Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): JEp-e 6� ��� ;4e
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 0 1/0 1/82
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _64 (county number); 11 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: _P_ultry operation
Layer
64000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using.the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer �6 0 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 64 - 11

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 23 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 15.2
2.4 Number o lagoons storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or 0 please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES r NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? p/ /0,1 A d
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Perm it - Animal
Waste Operations;
EGtI.
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
_
. field locations where animal waste is land applied;
33 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
Llil%V�
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. ,
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3. l0 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Pap 2 of 4 64 - 1 l

REAL:
VIATER QUP ITY SECTION
Facility Number: 64 - I I
Facility Name: Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: Non-Dlscharge Permitting
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for IFL)iL� r� 1f�I,t.� t y j`Cai f�._ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to (fie best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be ret rned to me as incomplete ,
Signatu; C-
Date — ._
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
.% I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date,
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 64 - I 1

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (IB8) -
„
r'
: Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor Washington Regional WQ Supervisor Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Wood6n Place
943 Washington Square Man
38M Bantu Dr.
.,;Asheville, NC 28801
Washington, NC 27889
Raleigh, NC 27611
(104) 251=620a
[phone] '
[phone] "
Fax'[phone]
T` , ' Fax (919} 975-371b
Fax [phone] '
IAvery ' '
. x • Marna,
�jl'.�B1itiCOmbe4'; "Madisoni`I
;Beaufort Jones
rams BCrtICC lr.•, `
Y Chatham i Nash
�IfIhA@'i�'; N
cs.�i��M -}�.�*'
'Mi �y
�M{ri/G�
Lla03f hr;'JS{
+r`I/''�.�.��♦ V '4'
�- v ai.il���� i,
�'+]', ton
i'k A'•�s .r/��$� ��)) r'"f 'i +d •'4
- X yy!i fi 54t,
�BurkC►Y "+ 7
t 11! 1 Y
, � r
�•�°cald�k►en s i Mitcheu �
�r'•—'�''e: �k iu*�`r��L�!�';
rL{..�i��t Y�� �M
4 l,i'. •y.1�liNiil{ r',1i.
" i " r } r+^ " . , 13 r ` Yj{ i « r �E•,
If � t' L 5 � f 1 i I
� ebowan, � Pamlico � � F rrraakhn �w�. Prom ��.,.F }
�• T"�•iaCYfQa �'- ° n t , ,:y� � z.uS � !��iNi
'F i'. �1< '��1�j KIN 4F'i
•'"w Y/r.; 1�'i
:r11000IU} • Dwayne ?� �s aw . ��;
i- • srs M--'' 'n-1 .c "i �1' SDI""}•:i
+ -iif,.i.x
••fir"'' rth EMf r.4H.-'-!,� i.? ,o-.•1,
i�l+ri5 "2.�.ky,.., iw «,^•. i. s
n,h�,i'tkti!,* T
A0, Y i YIN 'iY �'.7y
N�i°
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Moovesville Regional. WQ Supervisor
"'"`�'Wachovia Building; Suite 714
919 North Main Street
1 `"Fayetteville,NC 28301
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore
Alexander Lincoln
Bladen Richmond
Cabarrus Mecklenburg
Cumberland Robeson
Catawba Rowan
Harnett Sampson
Cleveland Stanly
Hoke Scotland
Gaston Union
Montgomery
Ireden ;.
� � ,+ ,e va'l fr.; ••_
P 1 � r' Gr�'''�'�:"'.�^h`Yj�'� �•saw i, .,
.
�'y '.� �
i � r+��' 'kt �'+ ,R-i •;c: r,ry.�i $�a'k'r` .i:.'r''i't•
tni, .:i__. ;� -i� . �.� _
i�a�'�, ,y�� �� •?Y
v.y Yy({.1 S. Ai �.:� hU.al! ..c �: •: rt
7` •,:�, ��nf �'1. �-F ,�! ; u..."t•�..�, DES .�..
c i. Y� ; C�i� • � �Y� � 1
FORM: AWO-G-E S/28/98
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
'� z
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]a
Brunswick New Hanover
CarteM Onslow
ire
Columbus Pftder,
,
i a t
' nupiln � � 'ys }� r �.i Y{ ��`-� • ixr�4e!
�dZt r ' i.r_ i ��1'v!� 4 y�'r ry, tAx' r YiM .� .•tt i, -�1 N �•.�:� syLy�:•'
`�ibr, i�'�`M>rsS ��� f� �• �f����'� j+��� S f, ^ z ,Y �a5 . Y, � k��t•' !
y V.
Page 4 of 4

a
X
• wl
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
0.
EDWIN REID'
7302 WATSON SEED FARM ROAD
WHITAKERS• NC' 27891
252-443-2372
Existing Layer
64000.00 bird
,S \J s ° ON
VJNIERQUA ITl
FEB 0 3 M9
Nor,_Discharge Permitting
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the*crop to be
grown'and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is.not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

4 '
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the.
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the'Environmental
Management Commission.'
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
64000 bird x 25.373 tons waste/bird/year = 1623872 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
64000 bird x 0.084 lbs PAN/bird/year =,5376 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is'a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

c
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TALE l: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
o
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
3.91
1
NoA
BH
6.1
305
0.00
1.79
545.95
I
APR-SEPT
3891
�"1
1NoA
:3891
2
NoA
3891
�-2
NoA
3891
3
NoA
:3891
_3
1 NoA
3891
4
1 NoA
:3891
-4
NoA
3891
5
NoA
3891
1-5
1 NoA
3891
6
NoA
3891
-6
lNoA
END
SG
50.0
150
�0.00
11.79
189.5 MAR
BH
6.1
I
I
1305
�0.00
12.27
1692.35
APR-SEPT
SG
50.0
I
150
�0.00
12.27
1113.5
SEPT--MAR
BH
6.1
I
�305
10.00 13.51
�1070.55
APR-SEPT
SG
50.0
0.00
I
�50
13.51
1
1175.5
SEPT-MAR
BH
6.1
I
�305
10.00 13.93
11198.65
APR-SEPT
SG
50.0
I
�50
10.00 13.93
�196.5
SEPT-MAR
BH
6.1
I
1305
10.00 13.77
�1149.85
APR-SEPT
SG
50.0
I
�50
10.00 13.77
1188.5
SEPT-MAR
BH
6.1
I
1:305
10.00 10.74
1225.7
APR-SEPT
SG
50.0 150
10.00 10.74
137
I
SEPT-MAR
TOTAL15683.55
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r'
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

J
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
s
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
L$S
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Sermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
50
1.0
BH
SG
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
16.01
5683.55
0
0
16.01
5683.55
* BALANCE
-307.55
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
.1
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the^ animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 3328 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 16640
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 55.4666666667 acres of land. If�you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 133.12 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25°s depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

` ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r
amounts of nitrogen.shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as.a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
3891
1
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
2
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
3
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
4
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
5
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
6
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.00
3891
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
NoA
SG
0.50
*1.00
3891
"6
NoA.
SG
0.50
*1.00
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ti
It is the responsibijity of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that thd'spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste phall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either,owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
` reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall -be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste„nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
15. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1.8. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21.. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five ( 5 ) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farr::EDWIN REID POULTRY FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) .before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25--year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: EDWIN REID
(Please print)
Signature: �C� ")- te'l. 4�u __ -Date: �� '�z
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)J. Edward Long
Affiliation:Nash Soil and Water Conservation District Phone
No. 919-459-4115
Address (Agency): Room 107 Ag. Center Drive
Nashville NC 27856
Signature : Date:
Page: 13

11

''r � ~f' •'i �t`r;t •'' 24` i � hr' a `: �'` '.r' _ '. '`C'i�e
�l' f�,� a �, 1�,.• ,, ,�, � ',.'T,
K � A i 1� � ' � '• Y �' r
it
KVA y ,�: t(►tirY r ' Mr; ;rr }' 1.. 1 _
f sue: f ,.}-..• �- •'�; i• •-, -_ r A, �,_ N; _ -y' ,r- ... . �..A-
*'� 1' y y� -�!� r '1•�V�.i•}':1 n i.'�•'r .k7, i': ,. ''i -1 . .. �L Y _''• ,l
�� �` -,1.ti• b�� � 1. ., , a1 5 I
lz
31
Aw
•w 1i r '�/�Y ,J��r� ,S, i'�r�}' I �' � �•e
"� C.��t ,''�r�R, 3r F15.' r; r;l �Y • � p [ t i- • '-, , I t'
_i—i i� J` t, _ f••": .[. •ram• , Y' •,':y y i
,I,� •�., A
`'•fit. ,y. rs� �., � ,.. .'.� _ r:r `i:'
*Sy y'' fJ�,\ •; ["ji✓ >nr" ', �� }Yi\y �� .'fi`��i}:� I� .r� .�.�, 't: r.
,.. F`+' �' s, r,t., r�',�t'.1 r�/�>M,, �� � '� i•�� 5-'nl / � r _. � 'a��'t � i�''tri
".isr�1y =� y•.. , iyt Ste} ��w�.;.l. r � i 'H, I r , rt ��9,,r� 1 {?t��•'.+
.�,'e ��,,'}rr �' '-•! tir � i 7r � ��L - a i,.ti ;, t . � � r ��� � j't ? ter t � y l+
-.rl+A�'N ' r4 �7 s t`� .i7w j- 4, 1� z.,1•� [s},i,.,l
•:,9.."'SGfi,•r�li_.!''S-�;ti.�:"4?��I?,�'�'p�_^4_.,�. ��s.,1;'.'.�i'i�•.�i'i =�:A .t{�?. :t .r.l.i�'�. ,5. .���,.3. ..i.i• �[�.J�[Q'y

USDA
NRCS
101 St. Andrews Street
Room 138
P.O. Box 10
Tarboro, NC
27886
Telephone
[phone]
TO: Terry Best
SUBJECT:.ENG - Edwin Reid
Irrigation System
Nash County, NC
DATE: August 18, 1998
FROM: Joy Sherrod
CC: Brock Equipment Company
I have reviewed the information submitted to me on the proposed waste water
land application system for Edwin Reid as furnished by Brock Equipment
Company. We have verified the system has been flagged and all applicable
buffers are in place. The operator should be encouraged to maintain a
permanent marker far the location of the gun cart at the start of each pull.
The design will meet NRCS standards and specifications once a cultural
assessment has been completed on the site and the waste utilization plan is
revised to show 16.0 wetted acres of bermuda hay and overseeding. I
understand the operator has agree to extend pull #5 out to the woods edge
to acquire the needed acres.
Once the system is installed, a letter of certification is needed from the
irrigation installer confirming the system has been pressure tested and has
been installed according to NRCS standards and specifications. You are
encouraged to visit the site during the testing of the system

Brock Equipment Co.
PO Box 100
.Bailey, N.C. 27807
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
This irrigation system was proudly designed by John Boykin- of Brock Equipment Co.
A scaled drawing, required calculations, and required specifications on pipe and equipment
are included.
The following buffers were maintained on this farm:
25 feet from ditch
50 feet from surface water and perennial streams
25 feet from property lines
200 feet from residence
100 feet from well
All comments and recommendations are appreciated.

Field Specifications
• The soil type on this farm is NoA
The lowest maximum application rate. (inches per hour) = .5
The lowest maximum application amount (inches per irrigation cycle) = 1.0
64000 birds x .0841bs of N per bird per year = 5376 lbs of N per year
Bermuda hay overseeded with small grain uses 355 lbs of N per acre per year
This plan effectively irrigates 1*.-22 acres _----
15-22 acres x 3 5 5 lbs of N per acre = 64f& i lbs of N used
This information was provided by Edward Long and Thomas Sledge of Nash
County NRCS.

W,
, Tk' P ; ,�- 'hy

Traveling Irrigation System Calculations
Application rate is calculated as:
2 ..
I = [(96.3_x Q) / (3:14 x 1.9 x RI )] x 360/W
Q = 96 Q = flow rate (gpm)
R =120 R = wetted radius (ft)
W = 330 W= portion of circle irrigated (degrees)
Application rate = .27
Total application amount is calculated as:
D = (1.605 x Q) / (L x S)
Q = 96 Q = flow rate (gpm)
L = 180 L = lane spacing (ft)
S = 2 S = travel speed (fpm)
Total application amount = .43
Velocity in supply line is calculated as.-
2
V=(.408xQ)/D
Q = 96 Q = flow rate (gpm)
D = 4 D = diameter of supply line
Velocity = 2.45
Brake horsepower is calculated as:
BHP = (Q x TDH) / (3960 x Ep)
Q = 96 Q = flow rate (gpm)
TDH = 214.04 TDH = total head pump operates against (ft)
Ep = .7 Ep = pump efficiency (decimal form)
Brake horsepower = 7.5

Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
0
Travel speed = 2 fpm
Application rate = .27 •� r
Effective width 180
Wetted diameter .= 240
Gun make and size = Nelson 100
Ring size = .77
Operating pressure at gun = 60
Operating pressure at reel = 80
Operating pressure at pump = 90
Are pattern = 330
Flow rate of sprinkler = 96 gpm
Pump power requirement (bhp) = 7.5
Total acres covered (effective) _
Traveler make and model = Cadman 2625
Hose length = 900'
Hose diameter (ID) = 2.625
Speed compensation = mechanical
Hydrant number
„ , ective Length
/_J• •lid
Acres Covered
3�}g-4- '7� =
1
440`4a v
_1-882-
/, 7 r
2
S-5$ 5-3.�
/S 6-
Z,2fi
- -7
4
dg + ra SYM 9r-1
j o
.4-OT
3,923
/
5
429 17'94-
2-5&
3. 7 7
6
7,5a /74
74
/(. D

Traveling Irrigation System Calculations
Application rate is calculated as:
2 .
I = [(96.3 x Q) / (3.14 x 1.9xR) }]x360/W
Q = 96 Q = flow rate (gpm)
R = 120 R = wetted radius (ft)
W = 330 W= portion of circle irrigated (degrees)
Application rate = .27
11� Total application amount is calculated as:
D = (1.605 x Q) / (L x S)
Q=96
L. = 180
S=2
Q = flow rate (gpm)
L = lane spacing (ft)
S = travel speed (fpm)
Total application amount = .43
Velocity in supply line is calculated as:
2
V=(.408xQ)/D
Q = 96 Q = flow rate (gpm)
D = 4 D = diameter of supply line
Velocity = 2.45
Brake horsepower is calculated as:
BHP = (Q x TDH) / (3960 x Ep)
Q = 96 Q = flow rate (gpm)
TDH = 214.04 TDH = total head pump operates against (ft)
Ep = .7 Ep = pump efficiency (decimal form)
Brake horsepower = 7.5

e
Friction loss
Friction loss is calculated as:
1.852 1.852 4.8656
FL=[(..2083 x (100/C) x (Q / D ) x (L/100)].433
C = roughness coefficient
Q = flow rate (gpm)
D = inside diameter of pipe (inches)
L Length or distance (feet)
Friction loss in traveler hose:
C = 150
Q=96
D = 2.625
L = 900
Friction loss = 16.41
Friction loss in supply line;
C = 150
Q=96
D=4
L = 1710
Fricion loss = 4.02

Total Dinamic Head
TDH Component
Sprinkler discharge pressure
Fl in pump suction assembly
Fl in pump discharge assembly
Fl in supply line
Fl in traveler hose
Elev. from water to pump
center line
Elev. of nozzle
Elev, difference between pump
center line and high point in field
Total
TDH in PSI
60
2
2
4.02
16.41
1.73
2.16
4.33
92.65
TDH in FEET
138.6
4.62
4.62
9.29
37.91
4
5
10
214.04

.N
Thmst Blocking
r'
4" SDR 21, 200 PSI, gasketed PVC pipe
Dead end and Tee (200 x 16.2) / 1200 = 2.7
90 Degree Elbow (200 x 23.0) / 1200 = 3.8
6" SDR 21, 200 PSI, gasketed PVC pipe
Dead end and Tee (200 x 34.8) / 1200 = 5.8
90 Degree Elbow (200 x 49.2) / 1200 = 8.2
7

Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convenient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of alf equipment.
Tow the.machine to the desired hydrant pull out correct amount of hose. Inspect
gun, gun cart and traveler for any damage or parts which may have come loose, during
move. Prime pump, start engine, let idle til pressure starts to rise. Slowly
increasing throttle XD pressure til reaching desired amount. Return -to traveler
crank motor, set reel speed to desired amount. (Inches per Min.)
Shut Down: Slowly return engine to idle reducing pressure to zero. Let engine
idle 30 seconds and shut off. Return to reel making sure engine is off. Move to
next hydrant and do start up procedure again.
Winterization -and regular maintenance: During prolonged cold periods below.
freezing, check engine antifreeze and drain pump housing. Blow adapter is supplied.
with reel to remove water from hose. open drain on gun cart, remove supply hose.
For regular maintenance change engine oil every 200 hours, reel engine every 100
hours after break in. Grease reel once every six (6) months where decals indicate.
2
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
October 1995 page-6 North Carolina

d.
41
BIG GUN(D PERFORMANCE T DLES U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES I3IG GUNS --- 240 TRAJECTORY"'
IDo T TAren Done rroxzLes
P,S.I,
+- Nozzls
.S. .
GPM CIA.
Naixl•
.SS.
GPM CIA,
Nozzle
A'
-GPM DIA•
NOW*
BS•
GPM DIA.
Nozzle,
7;
GPM DlA,
Nozzle
75•
GAM CIA,
Nozzle ,
Z.
GPM CIA,
Nozzle ''
.85.
GPM OIA,
Nozzss
A.
GPM DIA,
I Nozzle
1D.
GPM CIA.
3
' '
' Atl.i.+:�l ,3
' 2 :
a.A 4'
A3 ' ,11i'
r • 50'
�"Yi'
7
.r
10
so 205•
64 215-
74 225'
07 235'
1 100 ' 246'
115 250'
130 265'
ISO 273•
te5 280'
204 M.
70
6o 22s'
75 238,
6o 250,
103 263,
120 275'
138 283'
Iss 295'
177 302,
197 310,
243 338'
90
6a 245,
03 250,
100 270'
1 117 203,
135 295'
Is$ 306,
175 3151
201 '326,
223 3351.
274" 362,
r
110
76 265'
92 278'
111 200'
129 303'
150 315•
171 024•
t95 035'
222 34s•
2r7 31s,
304 360'
'Available only with F100 i SR1DO,
100 R RING NOZZLES ,,� 100 ON DIFFUSER NOZZLES
' PSI :>:' .71 RINp '..77 RING
GPM DIA' GPM CIA
.6 t ING
GPM DIA
...CORING -.
GPM CIA
,09 RING
GPM CIA
,• ,93 RING
. GPM CIA
. ' ,96 RINOI
GPM CIA
. 0.5 ON
GPM CIA
0.6014
GPM CIA
0,7 ON
GPM CIA 41
0.6011
GPM CIA
✓ ,R
4o ee 208 7e 212
91 215
wLTa- 3
103 22+
I�1ii-'�T'd.Z'
110 235
==5h�Ci3
134 23a
152 242
45 154
66 166
9; 142
118 Ist
: �'"1krst==
=]?i= ,=
1n3 2nn
u
.,S
6o 6t 23s 9e 240
to w 255 111 265
110 245
121 275
125 26a
145 gas
141 270
163 300
1n4 27;.
LLi'tY,�:l's��
109 309
—
—
Ito 70o •
143 216
211 315
—
IIMDT 4 �
"..�iL11L7D=
=Y=11=
I•$5•
100 1�0�5},I270 124 2260
142 20s
162 30S
1132 320
a2s^
23e ass
— —
—
+'�[il1 nN, 1• �
1 J 1
TMMUM
V. 1 a�J
f2,2
'J"<��i. JT'[
-iN
. -- i ns piama+sr or Inrow is ■pproximsiaiy JSY Iota iof the in- lramociary angle, o" loss for Ia .
.150 SERIES BIG GUNS — 24° TRAJECTORY."
150 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
.,r.,
P.S.I.IX
Nozzle ..
•'' GPM CIA,
Nozzle
GPM DfA.
Noxxle
}' GPM DIA,
Nozzle..
GPM CIA..
Nozzle
GPM CIA. '
Nozzle
GPM CIA,
Nortl0
GPM DIA,
60
1f0 265'
143 285'
152 305,
225' 325'
27S 345,
330 365'
36s 360,
!S? :?:Y77T!4'1",?ICiA
� .
?,•??TTiTi(9TR't!R5'�(f�
�j
f1
60
1 125 290•
165 310,
210 335'
260 35S'
1 315 375'
300 395,
445 410'
100
143 310'
1as 330'
233 355'
290 31F=I
355 400'
42S 420'
S00 440'
465 440'
' 120
157 33W
204 350'
258 375•
320 305,
385 420'
$45 460,
150 R RING NOZZLES �1
P.S.I.
Aln�
d6
GPM CIA.
Rlnp .
I7
GPM 01A.
Ring
1,00•
. 6 M !A.
AIM 4
t.ta
GPM CIA.
Ring
1, 2 6'
GPM CIA,
RIn4
1 34
GPM DIA,
AIR
L41 4
GPM CIA.
60
110 260•
143 200'
- 3 u�' ,W
102 ' 300'
22$ 315,
275 335'
330 350'
3es 365'�
e0
12e 2e0'
165 300'
f
210 320'
T4:CL°271 10 "'-ZB6
260 340'
Ts'T IIO�
315 360'
A=:1 ufL"TTir
inn 3M1a'
445 375=
3'. �Z 206I.r:,
300,
33" 1147
120'
;::
235 340'
to
290 380,
O
355 300'
�w120
'425 400,
465 420'
Soo 41!4
i�'1 T"1t7'Q'�r'"•
157 315'
2335'
258 3b0'
320 300'
30s 400'
545 435•
--Tne c1lamster o1 throw is sppfarlmaloy 3% loss lot the 21. lrsjocloryengfe. .
200 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 270 TRAJECTORY"
200 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
P.S.l.
' Hollis
1'05•
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
L1•
GPM CIA.
. Nozzle
1.2'
' GPM CIA.
Nozzle
IX1.4•
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
GPM CIAJIM&—f.5=30M
Nozzle
15'
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
1.6'
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
1.75'
GPM CIA.
Nozzle .,
1A'
GPM CIA,
4:
304.;:1.:u1
M: S .1..:
'"' 3 375
:�tf■3Q 00
4 d48
0
970
�s
270 360,
• ,� '
310 300•ss
3as•
41s 410•
4G3' 430•
sss 450'
630 4as•
755 4vs•
e9a sss'
� tr s
a a�•
='4�
vo
100�
110
a3
310 390•
3�dd"ST
350 10'
+05 425'
475 445'
s45 405'
625 465,
�;'e;O�TpD�
715 60S,
ass s3s'
loos sss•
I��DT^�.,T2Z�J3'b
390 430'
'"+ L__ itI
�SSda�'Si1b�P
"1:£Gi5�'dtfi'�[
346 41o'
31s..4.A2 '
445 450•
�=A=
405 465'
$25 470.,
=X==
sss 4as•
605 495'
=00=6=a3F1'
ess 515•
695 Sty
Syb
755 540•
790 535'
9aS S6S'
1110 S90'
�f�5"�.r
Soo SSW
1025 590
1 12to eta
130
370 425'
42s 445•
200 R RING NOZZLES
1 %. Ring
(1.29• sctvsll
GPM 011.
1 a,1' Ring
(1.46• actual)
1 'h' Ring _
(1.56• sclaalj
1 Ring
(I.GB• actual df;
1 K' Ring
(1,74- ■cluaq
1 'A' Ring
(1.8Y actual)
2' Ring
[1,23' anvil)
GPM DIA,
GPM DIA.
GPM orA,
GPM DIA,
GPM CIA,
GPM CIA.
0
-' 2S ' '
O0 a1,,,...35t' -
. 5 .. 37
' . —3 - 0Q' •
;.iL;r473 0.•7
3' 2
}
ea
^�
ea
750 5+0'
7 t1 ;7SS5.""s..
330 370,
36S 370'
'"1^'+"1 T' "^'1n+n 6111=
4.15 410'
S�A1tt�Z�
515 425•
505 440,
��1L'S
695 4S5'
SMcmFI.SI:AC�*i
Leo 37a'
Td36a""Ea
300 400,
445 420'
"'..".I5.7,`t+"CS35=
sty 440,
^1'u.td3"^
590 455,
^�YYQ..'"@YLffi�Tll
GIs 470'
6os 490•
100
`Ct�L3:g34C[-=dd
32s 300'
42s 42S.
too 445'
]'uL&ZL�
575 'Ins,
lCddT67G
rnn Ono
a 10'4
7ss spa'
i0
v00 s20'
175 351�TSG2'1
+gin
as
t,e ■in-
y rs�evs
•rn.....,
4a,, 44s'
rr7C. rb3`+
I+r 4nn
c
r.:w n15'
7y5 LOW
n gin•
. 5
nn .
.. Th. et+,nu..
el i. ._w.�-1_-,
.. ,___ ,--.
,
:� 7+i
8C4
11
15'� _
- -•-- - • - - -• -'- •-........,. _. ,,.r•n,.T ..,yew - ,
The DIG GUN- p01101'mance data has been oblalnod Under Idool lost conditions and may be ndva+snly elfactod by wind, poor hydI.1. DC enl,ance condillons Of other laclo,4.
Notion lnignlion Co,naraO-3n makes no .upwaonwilon Toga+ding droprul cond,lion, uoifn r•n ily. or ■Dpt$alion rile.

_ lam• - - ', � � . . ''f ,i ,�M.. ��l k,�
1.✓
XMENSIONS FOR GENERATOR SET APPLICATIONS:
21.6 h.
(548 rem)
Width
N
'NGINE DATA
32.4 In.
(Mired
Langth
'ENERALSPECIFICATIONS Engine Air Flow-0/min(m3huin) Prime .......................................................60(l.7)
.lodcl...................................................................................................................4020D Standby ................................................... .64 (1.8)
Jltinber of Cylinders ............................. .........4 Recommended Intake Pipe Diameter —in. (min) ,................................................1.97 (50)
yore and Stroke—in.(mm)................................................................3,31 x 3.54 (84 x 90)
)4placement—W (L)............................. ( ) U
........................................................1Z1.7 1.994 EXHAUST SYSTEM
:ompression Ratio ............ ...........................................................................................
18:!
`a[vcs per Cylinder—]ntakeiGxhaust............................................................................111
firinggOrdcr.........................................................................................................13 4 2 1
:ombustion System...................................................................................Direct Injection
ngineType...............................................................................................In•line, 4-Cycle
spiration ............................................... ................................................................Natural
ngineCrankcase Vent System............:....................................................................:Open
Winsum Crankcase Ptessure—in. H20(kpa)........................................................2 (0.5)
IlYSICAL DATA (Ind.& Ensint, FWicd Hmuing, Flywhed, and Eltcuict)
: (mm).......................................................................................32.4 (823)
zt,lt—in.
'ic(tlt—in. (n11n)..:.........................................................................................21.6
048)
tight —in. (mm)......................... ....................................................................32.2
(819)
'eight, dry (power unit)—lb.{kg}....................................y.................................495
(225)
(include flywheel & electric
:n Vr of Gravity Location
From Rear Face of Block (X-axis)—in.(mm)...............................................7.32
086)
Right of Crankshaft (Y-axis)—in. (nmi) ......................................................0.18
(4.6)
Above Crankshaft (Z-axis)-.-ins(mmj,�........................................................3.62
(92)
axnnumAllowable Static Beading Mouteptar 1
hear Face of Flywhed Housing wl.5 Pad--lb-h K11)
........................ .I �9 (216)
oust Sating Continuous Load LIniit ( onvatd)—lb. (N) .............................63
(2842)
1,.i
.ECTRICAL SYSTEM .
commended Battery Capacity (CCA)
12 Volt System—antp................. ..I............................................600
tx i mum Allowable Starting Circuir Resistance
12 Volt Sysrcm-Ohm ......................................................................................0.0012
rier Rolling Current 12 Volt System
at32' F (0' C)—amp.............................................................................................350
R SYSTEM
ximum Allowable Temp, Rbic—Ambit:n t Air to
Engine Inlet—'F('C).......................................................................................18 (10)
6110111 Air Intake R"friction
Dirty Air Cleaner —in. H:0(kPa).................................................................25 0,25)
Clan Air Cleaner —in. H2O Pit) ...................................... .... 12 0)
............................
:if{catiotu and design subject to change without notice.
Exhaust Flow—fWmin (mj/min) Prime ........................ 07)
Standby..................................................148 (4.2)
Exhaust Temperaturt—'F ('C) Primt....................................................806
(430)
Standby...............................................1112 060)
MaximurA Allowable Back Pressure —in. H2O(kPa).........................................51.3
(12.3)
Recommended Exhaust Pipe Diameter—in,(tnm)...............................................2.36 (60)
�IL
COOLING SYSTEM
Engine Hcit Rcicaion—li7Ulmin (kV)l me.....................................................682
(12A)'
ttt Standby ........................ ;....................... 752 03.2)
CWlaut w—gallniia (Urnin) .......................................................................15.6(60)
Thcrmatt,Start to Open—'F ('C)....................................................................160 (71)
ThamosladtiriJly open—'F CC). ........................................185 (85)
Maximum.}Clpter Pump Inlet Restriction --in. H2O (kPa)....................................40
00)
Engine Codanc Capaci"t. (L)................................................................... 4.9 (4.7)
Recotnnmid,q Pressure Cap—psi(kl'a):..............................................................1218
(88)
Maximum Top Tank Temp--'F CQ........................................ .................221 (10:5)
Recommended Air to Boil—'F('C)....................................................................117 07)
t� } F'y:••
'
FUEL. SSTEM
FuelInjeS irumP (Dubuque).....................................................................�..Yanmar
Governorulation...................................................................................... ....8% matt.
Govunoi-.pr......:::.....................................................................
..Mechanical
Fuel Co» sumprion—lblhr (kg/hr) Prime...... ..............................................
.8.8 (4.0)
Standby..................................................9.7 (4.4)
Maximum Allowable Fuel Pump$uction
CleaqSystem—psj (kPa)..........................................................................1.13 (7.8)
Fuel Filier Micron Size @ 98% EfPi6cricy.......................................................................10
LUBRICATION SYSTEM
Oil Pressure at hated Speed i (kl'a)............................................................49.7 043)
OilPrcasare at Low Idle —psi kPa)...................................................................39.9 {275}
In Pan Oil Temperature--'FCC).....................................................................240 (115)
OilPan Capacity. High---tlr.(L)...........................................................................9.4
(9.0)
OilPan Capacity, Low—yt. (I.)............................................................................fr.7
'rotal !;ngine Oil Capacity with Filters---qt. (L).....................................................10
(6.4)
(9,6)
Engine Aggularity Limits (Continuous) Any direction --degrees .....................................25
C
U

PHOTOCRAPIiS MAY SHOW NONSTANDARD EQUIPMENT.
PERFORMANCE DATA
Net Rated Power . -
1'rlmt... ...........................23.7 hp (I7.7 kW) C 1800 rp
Standby..............................26.1 hp (19.5 M C 1800 rp,
Low Idle Speed.........................................................1200 rpi
Altitude Capability (wto Defuelino ............4,921 Ft (1500 rr
4 .
FUEL CONSUMPTION @ 1.800 RPM"
LB/HR(KG/H)
Percent Power
Prime
Standby
25% Power
2.2 (1.0)
2.4 (1.1)
50% Power
4.4 (2.0)
4.9 (2.2)
75% Power
6.6 (3.0)
7.3 (3.3)
100% rower
8.8 (4.0)
9.7. (4.4)
PERFORMANCE CURVE
.. i._..i. 2..
.....i,..e...
.... ...i... a..
...
.. .'
. ,
:,.
•-.d...�'.
..L..
..._
.
.. 8.8lb/hr.....
, .f...
�,.j...L..i
6.0
txn
.....i..
.E..
...:..j...:.
--I
I
,........
i
s�
e
le 74 32
ca
r�r 4A 0 AN
nn O.W. pwmo--hp rwn
skWo or fmv nisi co-ay.gtWo
10.0
(4.e)
............'.
cc
(4.4 kVW) . _
._.�......
.�._
Q
7
'
e
to 24 32
Iel
(u) Ile) C+N
DEERE

BERKELEY PUMPS
TYPE "B" RATING CURVES
ENGINE DRIVE
m
CURVE: 4117
DATE 1-27-89
PAGE 0,51
SUPERSEDES
Curve 4117 Page 0.51
Dated 9-1-88
co": Mew C.I. P■ Ift- L-1026 NOM.N& L-1026 VARIOUS ILP.M-
r.Paw: meow C.I. P.m Ne. M-1802 medLNa M-1802 D1a 9" full T.D,t LWft�.elwa
.e. 1= c• . ter.
W
20�
10,1"
J
a
0 J
TDSL
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
CAPACITY IN U.S. GALLONS PER MINUTE
C-8610 e..wen T-1355 6op.n.e.. C-6576 D.L. 4-17-80 D.I. 8-18-80 MODEL82ZOM
Ceee: M.I.rW C.I. Pen.No. L-3482 m.ckNo. L-3482 VARIOUS 1LP.M.- c""
I"Iler: Melerw C.I.' Pett.N.. 14-5059 Meeh.No. M-6915 DI.. 10-7/16" full T.D.S.L.ler . wow mi
l.. —.l h..b-P.i ,
20
10rw
V
k
0 R
400
It
350
9
2 300
x•
u
250
0
200
0
r
150
100
50
TOSL
0
CAPACITY IN U.S. GALLONS PER MINUTE
CC-8573 ...wow T-3753 e.u...a.. C-8513 D.-.a 7-31-79 D.I. 12-8-80 MoDfiB2EQHH

'�'V' 9 5 2 - 1 9 9 .8
1.46
Y E A R S O F
.E X C E L L E N C E
adman
POVM E011"ETiT
�—r+eob
SPECIFICATIONS
MODEL
AXLE
INSIDE
DIAMETER
OF HOSE
STANDARD
LENGTHS
AVAILA9LE
2250
1
2.25"
700'
2M
1
2.625"
900'
3000S
1 1
3.04"
600'
it►�� Yi��•�
-:f' �, .iN a5�1M1I�•��4 i�•• �''P'r•:i��`i'�a`�ir.�•�;P1'
• Honda 4 hp. OHV engine.
• Slewing ring turntable.
• P205165R15 tires on 2250.
• 9.50L-15 tires on 2625.
• 9.50L-15 tires on 3000S.
• 4 gallon aluminum fuel tank.
• Automatic gun cart stop.
• Hose build-up safety switch.
• 3-wheeled gun cart.
• Nelson SR-100 gun on 2250.
• Nelson SR-100 gun on 2625.
• Nelson SR-150 gun on 3000S.
Litt kit for gun cart.
FEATURES
• Single chain drive on drum using
heavy duty traction pins.
• 3" x 5' tube frame.
• Four (4) coats of paint.
• Best quality 2406 medium density hose.
• Flip down stabilizers on 2250.
• Gear driven telescopic stabilizers on 2625
and 3000S.
• Disc brake to prevent hose recoil.
• Mechanical speed compensation.
• 2.5" x 25' feeder hose on 2250.
• 4' x 25' feeder hose on 2625 and 3000S.
• Speedometer.

�ZSV Zi7i�5
a
:3VVUb__0
=• TOP VIEW OF CADMAN MECHANICAL CAM DRIVE
HOSE SPEED. COMPENSATION
SPEED COMPENSATION
The Cadman MECHANICAL CAM DRIVE HOSE '
-SPEED COMPENSATION SYSTEM has simplified
i�
the task of very accurately compensating the hose
r
retfieve speed for the increase In drum diameter
£
as hose is rewound onto the drum.
MAIN DRUM CHAIN
sPEEo
Here's how it works. A sepsar bar, riding against
COMPENSATION BAR
the hose as it winds onto the drum, operates erates a cam
on the variable speed drive pulley by way of a cable.
As the cam rotates, the pulley pitch is adjusted just
enough to accurately compensate for changes in
REDUCTION eex
hose speed over the entire retrieve cycle. The result
ALTERNATE P.T.O.PP
Dlac BRAVE
is an even application from beginning to end!
� 9
WINDUP
Important: The Cadman engine drive system uses
4 HP, HONDA ENGINE
"0" P.S.I. because it is self-contained and separate
from the fluid irrigated, whereas pistons, bellows,
VARIABLE SPEED
or turbines lose 5 to 20 P.S.I. This loss has to be
PULLEY SET
overcome by a pump running harder. These other
ORIVEHDISCONNECT
CABLE DRIVEN CAM
systems usually result in using less main line or a
HANDINHEEL SPEED
smaller gun nozzle in order to keep the pump
CONTROL CABLE ADJUSTMENT
pressure within operating maximums.
THE CADMAN 2250r 2625 AND 3000S ARE USED FOR MANY DIFFERENT
WATER APPLICATIONS AS WELL AS LIQUID MANURE AND MUNICIPAL WASTE.
Model .
Hose
Hose
Input P.S.I.
Gun
Flow Rate
Lane
Acres
Time to Apply
Time
I.D.
Length
at Traveller
P,S.I.
GPM
Spacing
per Pull
1 Inch acre
per Pull
130 .
85
115
223'
4.0
3.9 hr.
15.6 hr.
2250
2.250
700'
130
75
130
225'
4.0
3.5 hr.
14.0 hr.
150
85
140
236'
4.3
3.3 hr.
14.2 hr.
150
75
152
236'
4.3
3.0 hr.
12.9 hr.
130
85
155
240'
5.5
2.9 hr.
18.0 hr.
130
75
174
240'
5.5
2.6 hr.
14.3 hr.
2625
2.625"
900,
150
85
190
246'
5.7
2.4 hr.
13.7 hr.
150
75
205
252'
5.7
2.2 hr.
12.5 hr.
130
85
285
292'
4,9
1.6 hr.
7.8'hr.
130
75
320
300'
5.0
1.4 hr.
7,0 hr.
3000S
3.04"
600'
150
85
345
313'
5.3
1.3 hr.
6.9 hr.
150
75
375
317'
5.3
1.2 hr.
6.4 hr.
Cadman Power Equipment Limited, whose policy is one of continuous improvement, Cadman Power Equipment's 46 years of leadership and
reserves the right to change specifications, design or prices without incurring experience In design and manufacturing stands behind every
obligation. Cadman Traveller produced. A complete line of pumps, pipe and
accessories are all available from one company.
POWER EQUIPMENT
AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY AND IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
Sox 100, Courtland, Ontario, Canada NOJ 1 EO
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

J
Handling and Installation of PVC P1,1siir. Pi�,n
Temperature has a major effect on PVC plastic,pipe. 'As temperatures
approach freezing, the flexibility and impact resistance of PVC plastic
pipe is greatly reduced. -At low temperatures when joining solvent'weld
pipe, a longer time is required for the glue -to set. Generally solvent
weld pipe should not be joined at temperatures below 400F. At high
temperatures pipe becomes more flexi.ble and set-up time for the glue is
greatly reduced.
When pipe is stacked, it should not be placed in piles more, than
five feet high. Occasionally out -of -round pipe will result from stacking.
In warm weather, once the weight is removed, it will rapidly assume a'
round shape. In cold weather, several hours may be required for the pipe
to return to the original, shape.
Sunlight can have an effect on the pipe, especially in colors other
than white. It may warp and exhibit a snaking effect. When left in the
sunlight for long periods, the color may fade and the pipe will harden
at the surface causing a loss of impact strength. Discolored pipe should
be handled carefully during installation. If pipe is to be stored out-
side for long periods of time, it .should be covered with a cover of
opaque material, not plastic, and air should be able to circulate under
the cover.
Gaskets. should be stored away from excessive heat and solvents.
Some pipe comes from the manufacturer with the gaskets installed.. If the
pipe is not to be installed immediately, the gaskets should be removed
and stored. -
When installing gasket pipe there are several. simple steps to follow
that will ensure leak -free joints.' The gasket or ring groove should be
cleaned of foreign materials. The gasket should be properly installed.
Ample lubricant should'be placed on the male pipe end, the pipe aligned and
the male end inserted into the female end. Some pressure will be required
to force the male end to the correct depth. There will be a reference
point to indicate the required penetration depth. If penetration is not
deep enough the joint may leak; and if penetration is too deep, there is
not adequate room for pipe expansion. Once the joint is made, the pipe
being installed should be rotated to ensure that the gasket is not pinched.
Gasket pipe may be connected in the trenc" {tio ground be the
trench and then lowered into the trench. If the latter is done, -check
each joint to ensure that penetration is correct. If it is necessary to
cut pipe, either a PVC pipe cutter or a niter box with a carpenter's
fine-toothed handsaw should be used. For gasket pipe, it will be necessary
to bevel the pipe, usually at an 80 angle, a�_complished with a special
rasp or file. For solvent weld pipe, burry chips and'filings should be
removed from the outside and inside of the pipe and it is preferable to
slightly bevel the outside circumference.
Fittings for gasket pipe may be plastic cr steel. The trend in
the industry today is to use epoxy coated steel fittings. These are
manufactured by several companies (McDowell, Pierce, Davis, etc.) and can
-4 -
d

Irrigat.un Water Conveyance'430.00-3
The ratio of air -release valve diameter to pipe
following formula must be usod In designing
diameter for valves intended to release air when
thrust blocks:
. filling the pipe should not be less than 0.1.
However, small -diameter valves may be used to
limit water hammer pressures by controlling air
• A . 98 ND� sin �
release where control of filling velocities Is,
questionable. Equivalent valve'outlet diameter of
where: `
less than 0.1 are permitted for continuously
A - Area of thrust block ?eQuired in hi
acting air release valves. Adequate vacuum relief
l•t - Maximum working pressure in tt \
1
must be provided.
o - Inside diameter of pipe in tt
8 - Allow=ie passive pressure of the soil in
Alr-release valves or combination air valves shall
)>y
a - Oellectian angle of pipe bend
be used as needed to permit air to escape from
,
the pipeline while the line Is at working pressure.
Small orifices of these types shall be sized •
according to the working pressure and venting
Area of thrust blocks for dead ends and tees shall
requirements recommended by the valve
be 0.7 times the area of block required for a 90-
manufacturer.
deflection angle of pipe bend.
Manufacturers of air vales marketed for use
under this standard shall provide dimensional
data, which shall be the basis for selection and
acceptance of these valves.
Drainage'. Provision -shall -be made'for
completely draining the pipeline it a hazard is
Imposed by freezing temperatures, drainage is
recommended by the manufacturer of the pipe,
or drainage of the line Is specified for the job. If
provisions for drainage are required drainage
outlets shall be located at all low places In the
line. These outlets may drain into dry wells or to
points of lower elevation. If drainage cannot be
provided by gravity, provisions shall be made to
empty the line by pumping or by other means.
Flushing. If provisions are needed for flushing
the line free of sediment or other foreign material,
a suitable valve shall be Installed at the distal end
of the pipeline.
Thrust control. Abrupt changes In pipeline
grade, horizontal alignment, or reduction in pipe
size normally require an anchor or thrust blocks
to absorb any axial thrust of the pipeline. Thrust
control may also be needed at the end of the
pipeline and at In4ine control valves.
Thrust blocks and anchors must be large enough
to withstand the forces tending to move the pipe,
Including those of momentum and pressure as'
well as forces due to expansion and contraction.
The pipe manufacturer's recommendations for
thrust control shall be followed. In absence of
the pipe manufacturer's requirements, the
If adequate soil tests are not available, the
passive soil pressure may be estimated from
Table 1.
Materials. All materials shall meet or exceed the
minimum-requiremEnts indicated In
'Specifications for Materials."
Plans and specifications
Plans and specifications for constructing high-
pressure underground plastic pipeline shall be In
keeping with this standard and shall describe the
requirements for applying the practice to achieve
its intended purposes.
Table I. --.plowable soil bearing pressure
Natural soil maronal
aeorrl at cow41
to cenrar of tnnut block
2 ft 3 It 4 tt 5• ft
5ow+d twdrock.... ......_.....
8.000
10.000
10,0w
10.000
O*rtw sans and gravel
meutu. (assumed
0 -+0') ........................
1.200
1.800
2.400
3.000
a.naa (ins to cssuae sand
(asuuned e - 3.5') .......
800
1.200
1.6.50
2.100
sift aril day rluWure
(asuunod I -Z5•) .._:..
500
700
950
12W
soft CLSY and arranic
soils (asaumed
4 r 10•J ....... I.. .............
200
S00
AM
Soo
SCS, January 1989

.. y
M
Figure 2. Anchorage blocks..f'or incline valves.
Table 1 is the forces encounter.e&at end plugs ..to calculate
forces encountered at bends, -tees and wyes, multiply the figure in
Table d by the factors given in Table 2,
Table 1. Thrust*W at End Plugs
Thrust in hs _ for test DrPSSl1rP_ in asi
Pipe Diameter
inches
'100 PSI
150 PSI
200 PSI
250 PSI
11-2
295
440
590
740
2
455
680
910
1140
2j
660.
990
1320
1650
3
985
1480
1970
2460,
4'­
1820
2720
3630 '
4540
6
3740
5600
7460
9350'',."
8
6490
9740
13,000
16,200
10
10,650
16,000
21,300
26,600
12
15,150.
22,700 .
30,200
37,800
14
20,600
30,800
41,100
51,400 ,•1:
16
26,600
39,800
53,100
66,400
J�'

DIAMOND PLASTICS
CORPORATION
_ IPS IRRIGATION PIPE
ASTM D2241
Stock Nominal ' Wolf7ht Outsldo Wall ' Insldo Plocoa Par Foot for Foot Par
Plant izn er100 ft a knnss 01nmoter 13undln Bundlo Truck[
[�r� ` SDR.. 41 100 PSI .. ... ;.
Lrs 4 - ` l' '
r Q��.41 4.500 .110 4.280 63 1,260' 20,160
M 6" �2��?a1�'1110't. 6.625 .162 6.301 28/32 560/640 8,400
01 8.G25 .210 1 0.205 15/10 300/2d0 4,840
M 10" 10.750 .262 10.226 12 240 . 34420
M 12" 8 12,750 .311 12.128 6/0 120/160 -•2, 100
SDR - 32.5 125 PSI
M 4"+0h 4.500 .138 4.224 63 1,260 20,160
M 6"�
,�� rQ�F 6.625 .204 6.217 40/32 560/640 8,400
l4 8" u h�r1 a '. 8.625 .265 8.095 15/10 300/200 4,840
M 10" � 10.750 .331 10.088 12 240 31420
M 12" 0 12,750 .392 11.966 G/8 120/160 21100
K 2" i•, SDR - 26 160 Psi
d ,` . 1p 2.375 .091 2.193 204 4,080 65,280
M 3" 'a U�+n« 3.500 .135 3.230 88 1,760 28,160
5'F3 f. M
4.500 • .173 4.154 G3 1, 2G0 20,160
M 6" i 00t 6.625 .255 6.115 28/32 560/640 8,400
M 8" 8.625 .332 7.961 15/10 300/200 4,840
M 10" �iQ 10.750 . 413' 9.924 12 240 3,420
it 12• 72.10: 12.750 .490 11.770 6/8120/160 2.100
"
mr� immix
�154
SDR - 21
•
200 PSI
M
3"
..9,0$�
�,~,
2.375
.113
2.149
204
4,080
65,280
89
.3 .500
.•167
3.1G6
88
11760
28,160
M
4"
"t
4.500
.214
4.072
63
1,260
20.; 1.60
M
M,
6:'"l��
8"
Q
'�;1�20;'
6.625
8.625
.316
5.993
7.805
28/32
15/10
560/640
300/200
8,`400
4,-�40
M
10
06*�.
10.750
.410
9.728
12
240
3,420
M
12";O0
12.750
.511
. 60G
11.530
G/8
120/160
' 2, 100
•
Prices are subject to a firm policy of "Price in effect at tine of shipment on regular purchase."
Possession of this page of a price list does not constitute an offer to sell.
*Freight regulations &/or eduipincnt may reduce maximum footage per truckload.
All prices F.O.B. manufacturing location.
L = normal stock item at Lubbock, Texas
M = normal stock item at Macon. Georgia
Joints Per Quart of Lubricant
(Furnished)
4" 05
6" 60
8" 45
' 10" 35
12" 25
15• 15
10• 12
2 1 " 10
24- a
27" 5
Additional Lubricant
12 QG- per ca::e
d Cal , per

FI`u,e
THRUST 13LOCKS
t. Teti
1 11 I. I'IuRgcd End o! Tee
), 9o• Obow
J. Gnd Cap& or Plue&
S. Valre
6. S,cep Incline .6-
0

1 .. � •-. � •.'Y.Jh,Y..•-' •. M�IML�w�'H.h,•►t.Vl. �i�./V" �,
Goderal Installation
Pecommenclatlons:
FOR GASKET PIPE
hlstallation
tixr,avatlon, Laying, Testing, and Back-
flliing Instructions are usually provided
by the Engineer In charge of tho projoct.
Roforence may also be made to Amarl-
�mr1 Society for Testing and Materials
Standard, ASTM D-2774 "Recommended
'racilce for Underground Installation of
rhormoplastic Pressure Piping."
A
=xcavation
. The trench bottom shall be stable,
:orillnuous, relatively smooth, and free
,I rocks or other objects detrimental to
ho pipe. It shall provide continuous
lupport for the pipe, and boll holes shall
)a Provided for the boll and spigot Joints,
'alves, and other syslam components
ha 1 might act as a fulcrum. When made
irough a rock cut, at least 4" of com-
acted satisfactory bedding material
Mill be provided.
. The trench depth shall place the pipe-
ne at least 8" below the lowest recorded
ost depth, and shall place the pipeline
entlr of least 30" below grade. .
T lie trench width at the lop of the pipe
inll be as narrow as practical to allow
Jacluate room for Joining the pipe and
allow proper compaction of the sideflll.
lolrnum trench width Is normally con-
deirod 12" plus the pipe O.D.
Pipellnos shalt be cased. bridged, or
,horwlse protected at locations where
iey will be subject to heavy surface
ads due to shallow burial. Casing shall
so ba used In spanning crooks and
jillos, extending 8 ft. on either aide of
,r. creek or gully.
ointing
The pipe shall be Jointed 1n the trench,
ubove ground, In accordance with Iho
ilnting Instructions.
l I Is Important that the gasket be clean
id properly seated, the spigot end wall
orlcalod, and the boll and spigot ends
uriod correctly In both•planas.
If lolnling Is done above ground, care
ould be taken when lowering pipe Into
a trench that the depth of tho Joint entry
ursins correct, Chock that tho depth
dntry mark on Iho spigot ends Is flush
Ilr the face of the bell. Jointing of V
J to rpo plpo Is usually done In Ilia tronch.
AT NO TIME should a back-hoo or
illar device be used to assambio pipe.
Thrust ©lockinfl
As with other push -I'll rubber gaskotod
Joints, the pipe will not lake and thrust
without restraints. Thrust blockA are
usually required at load ends and
wherever the lino changes direction of
30 degrees or more.
1. Thrust blocks shall be placed so that
the boaring,surface is In direct line with
the major force created by the pipe or
filling. Con croto having a compressive
slronglh of 2000 psi is Iho rocommondod
blocking malarial, and may be poured
between the simplest of forms and the
undisturbed earth bearing surfaces.
I+ 2. Thrust blocking size maybe calculated
as follows: - .
a) Multlply the pressuro level dosirod
for testing by the value shown In the
table for thrusi on fittings:
Thrust In Pounds
Pipe
Site
go
Elbow
45
Elbow
22%
Bond
Dead End
or Tao
0'
40.74
20,30
13.45
39.10
0"
02.01
44.72
22.00
61.10
10'
120.04
e9.47
36.42
05.05
12
100.54
77.23
49,82
1 133.70
b) Determine the bearing strength of
the soil from the following tablo;
BEARING STRENGTH OF SOILS_
SOIL lb. per Sq. Fr.
Muck. pant, olc.
0
Solt clay
1,000
Sand
2,000
Sand and gravel
3,000
Send and gravel comonlod with clny
4,000
Hard shale
10.000
c) Dlvlda the total thrust on the fitting
(stop a) by the bearing strength of
the loll (stop b). The result Is that
square loot of area noodod on tho
face of tho.thrust block
d) Thrust blocks should haunch ilia
pipe or filling, not encase It.
13ackflUing
1. Place select backlltl and compact
under the haunch, along the silos of,
and over the lop of the pipe to a com-
pactod depth of at least V. This backilll
shall be soils that allowgood compaction
and placed In 0" layors,woll compacted.
It shall be free of rocks. frozen clods, or
other hard objects.
2. Tho flna(bnck ill may than be made In
Ilia usual mannor, but care should be
-taken not to dump large rocks or hoavy
oblocts on the Initial bacldill and pipeline:
3. If the Joints and fittings must be $aft
exposed w}tlle under test, backflil to
within ono fool of each aide of the Joint
or fitting to prevent deflection of the
pipe while under lost pressures.
Testing
i.' ALLAIR IN THE PIPELINE SHALL 8E
BLED OFF CAREFULLY WHILE FILLING
TH E LINE WITH WATER FOR TE;STIN G.
Entrapped air In the line can cause ex-
cossive lost pressures, .and create un-
necessary problems. Air shall- be bled
off at .the high spots In the line. Air,
removal may also be accompllshed•by
pushl'ng a foam plug through the line by
Incoming water pressure. .
2. Test pressures may be .1 ys limes the
designed operating pressure of the
pipeline, but shall not exceed the maxi-
mum pressure rating of the pipe.
3. After pressure test and acceptance
of testing, the uncovered Joints and fit-
tings shall .be Initially backflllod with
wall compacted soil, and then covered
with final backflll. -
4. Hydraulic pressure testing of the
pipeline shall be carried out Initially at
Intervals not exceeding 500 yards and
thereafter at Intervals not exceeding
1,000 yards.
Radius Bends
Gradual change qI direction may be
achlevocibydoilocting or cocking RIrBER
Joints a maximum of 3 degrees without
affecting the hydraulic seal cF the Joint.
Offsets are made only aftert6a.slraight
In-Ilno assembly Is made. Deflections at
the Joint and minimum curve radii (ft.)
obtainable are listed below,.
D*13roo of
Deflection
al the Joint
Offset, Inchon Radius, feel
1
4.2"
1,1500
2
0.3"
572'
3
12.3"
391'
-4 -

be fabricated in almost any configuir tiion. Some epoxy coated fittings" `..
include•stacks.and hydrants as, an integral .part of the fitting. ,
Occasionally it may, be necessary'.tO.'cronriect :PVC plastic pipe to: steel: `•
or CA. pipe'. ,This.connectiori gran' b•e',made with a cquplina called �a"
transition or repair coupling.'+ In -line valves can be supplied with" '
connections 'td gasket pipe: ' • ' :'
Thrust blockind is required for gasket pi 'a..' 'Most thrust' blocks•'' •'�'';'`'
will be concrete. ' Manufacturers recommended thrust blocks at any.'' - 'J,' ' "
change in••d•irect•ion,gr,eater• than.l0o.,.,.Figure 1 gives. an example-:ofdifferent arrangements jor' thrust bl,ocl s -
� �: .... :a ,r. •, : . : ,fit �• .. .. • ••Y , •'T'
• '• •' �: ', .. 'r . •%•I.r ,.'. •�' f 1•.. �Ji�i. •t ed�r'•t:•I :E yti /•r. •.
• ,i. .•�+. ,�.... .l'I'� 's:, 1. .: , ,; ,
... r: .. r .. .•f• S. ii• .. r r •tom• i,
• 1
Figure 1. Example of different arrangements for thrust blocks.

Table 2. Factors for Calculating Thrust W for
Elbows and Tees. '
,r
Elbows:- 900 = 1.41 Tees = 0.70
600 a ` 1.00
45° = 0.76
300 = 0.52 '
22.5° = 0.39 ,
v
Table 3 gives the safe bearing load for different soil types.
Table 3. Safe Bearing Load
i
Soil 1 b/ft2
Mulch,, -peat and similar ;. .0
Soft Clay 1000
Sand 2000
Sand and gravel3000
Sand and'gravel•cemented-
with clay. 4000
Hard shale 10,000
Thrust - block area(ft2� ..W .. Thrust (Table 1 & Table 2)
F , oz earing. strength „ a e 3)
In placing concrete thrust blocks, check with the manufacturer of the
pipe being used'to ensure•that.the correct size thrust blocks are
being used.
There are a number -of' machines that ''can be used to. prepare the
trench for PVC plastic pipe.;. SoJ1 types, moisture content, depth of
trench' required .and type and diameter of, pipe must be considered.
General ly,chain trenches, wheal' trenches, backhoes, or vibrating plows
will be used for trench preparation. The vibrating plow can only be
used for solvent weld PVC pipe -and generally is limited to the smaller
diameter of -.pipe. -Under most conditions the chain trencher or wheel
trencher will be faster than.'the'backhoe. Where wide trenches for large
pipe -are required, the'backhoe �Wili be most- satisfactory, if soil
conditions permit, long stretches of open trench will expedite pipe
installation. However, if rain is forecast the pipe should be installed
and the trench backfilled. To avoid sharp turns in the -line at obstructions,
trenches should be curved within limits of curvature of the pipe.
-7-

on cacti side of tits pipe to provide'sbjipotk rich from voids. final bdckflll dilly •rick thb ndlilmaht depth -of cover lies been
• Care should be taken to Avoid defotmtiij; displacing', or placed and o,i.ly with pipe having wall thlcknasaaa gr4attS then
damaging tits pipe during this phaie of tit& operatloh. ! thai of SDR•41... , , .,;• „ • `
0.4 F"I baeklilt. �r
GAA Cirieiil„ Aftci plpcllne iciness, hnAl' bicf�d Shill be sL'GTi�" 7-5P C1A�. CDNSID�RATIONS
placed ind spread lit approxiiiiatety,.uhlform-layers in such i i.Boll liol'al<-10i,.k'ubw biskii! jdlriilt. When did pipe bithg In.
manner as to Gil ilia Wnch eordlittiely'io Ihdk,theri will be iio stalled li provided With itlbbci,iisket joltits; bell holes shall be
unrtlled spaces under or about locks of lumps bf earth In Ilia excavated irk kite bedding material ko allow .for the unobstructed
backflll. Final backfiU shall be free of large rocks, froteri clods assembly lsf khi joilit. Cate 111o6ld be taken that ilia bell bola Is no
and other debris greater than 76 irim (9 In.) lit dlsmctet. Itolling larger,than'ticetssary tit aceemp[ish proper Joint assembly. When the
equipment or heavy tampirs should bi {lied lti'eorisolidate khd • jothk had been liiidei the bell. We should be carefully filled with
Tiht.t ii - THROST IILOCKINO AIVD'Ai4cim s' Irb1t 1AjJl:RdlltillNXt IlkiiidAtlOil 8IP$Lli4Zb
•• '!' -_ u S1r$ 1. iultiply Ilia Workltik biiestiii br {hi arpioprlaki value
+Y
' +t�•. �,. tiiiii" lit tbi ldUovvl.niS table to obtain lulu thrust LAN (lb):
'�,1',r: 4'{ ': •.' t 1t11I'k{LWE illllltST irAITTOItSA, f • i
'; !'. r .!Asti p.r ,"� •
r1pA Sits ' ti-ij 1=tid boo At$ 22•ile
' dit�•a,o '•
�;t• , 4•, 6 dt. life idb3 ` f or too elbow klbotr Elbow
i-i/S SQ. 4.04 i : Litt : 1.26 1.15. '
2 60. , ! j 4.68 t1.46 3.60 1.708
t 2-1l2 43.5 , , 8.Q6' 9.40' 5.10 2.00
3 70.2 9.$D, 13.0 7.51 ' 3.92'
3412 93.0 12.A 18.1 9.81 4.09
4 . i01.0 1(J.2 28.0 12A 6.31
6 127.0 24.7 36.0 18.0 9.03
r,"tl� 0 16Z.4 84.8 40.2 20.7 13.0
3�• �'r dp 8 203.2 15l),0 A3.6 45.2 23.0
t�J.' 1d "' 254.0 ol.d 130.0 70.0 36.9
',.• a Qa lr�}f',r' ;}. 1:. 13 ' 804.8 129.0 182.0 98.I5 50.3
bti Ali of
6 IIased da tltrusk per kP1 Us!) brauurs
', ` 1 ts1°.• } • illockint for tross may riot be needed with Ions branch lines.
4
• p
p • f} �rJ,.
Slop i. )]etithd4i thi 6s"i stringth of Lite soil (torn the table
biloWi ,
33HAIt1NO STRENGTH OF SOILS
6ollaaliil Site ileiilat Loadi lbf0 kis
Sound Slia s, '
10 000 .
478.8
Cemeiitad Grive( uii Sired
difficult to pick,
4 000
101.6
Coira6 ihd find corripict'diiid•
3 000
143.0 .
Medlura Clay-Ciil b4 6aded '''
:' 2 000 "
95.8
Soft Clay
1 000
47.9
Muck
•.O
0
Stop J. Divide We total thrust obiilr ed In $tep 1 by'lhe beuing
strenath of Ulm soll to hit the area tieeded, m2 (it ).
SIIJZ THRUST ),LTEARA1'it k1toi;k6tJitz
1'lpil Site
Sidi Tluuak-per heir**•
iii, nests
16
N
2.112 a3.6
11.a
61.6
3 76.2
17.1
76.1
3-1/2 98.6
22.4
99.6
4 101.0
28.3
126.9
b 127.0
43A
191.1
a •. •162.4
270.6
8 201.2
103.0
469.2
10 ' 264.0
160.0
711,7
12 104.8 ' ,
t'' 225.0
1000.8
i tlasnd on ilde thrust t.;r bill) iil'A (iM pat) nroaau.te per desire of
„ deflection.
r. • ,
NOTltl Multiply ildi U,liiit front
tibli tiir"diezi is of dillsaticit
dudes kPi (yak) dlvtdid by i00• to ubt.lr't
total side iltrust
lu N (lb).
`G

EMERGENCY ACTIONPLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919--571- 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGtMENT SYSTEM 919-459- 7376
SWCD 919- 459-4115
NRCS 919- 459-4115
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. -
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The Following
are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of'dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields -at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field --actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluatethe application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
- separators -action include:
a: Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?,
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential, to reach surface
waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property) ?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919 571-4700• After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, yreather and wind conditions.
The corrective mdasures that have been under taken,
and -the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-459-7376.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-459-9810 , local SWCD
office phone number 919-459- 4114 and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-- 4 5.9- 4115.
h 4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for -you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
C. Contractors Phone:
'6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: NRCS SWCD
b. Phone: [phone]
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
alrudr7nr.hlwrrdr.mprerldrn.dcx
"Pt 12.96

Poultry Layer Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause - _ BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Poultry production Cr Vegetative or wooded buffers;
[ice Recommended best management practices;
GY" ood judgment and common sense
Floor surfaces (walk •
Wet dirty surfaces
Scrape manure, dust* feathers into collection
/�GcJ
1. )es
aisles) ,-
alleys;
-s
C] Splash boards along upper ends of collection
�riPiy
l
alleys;
"per
1
4
ventilation
Cage manure dropping •
Manure -covered surfaces
0— Scrape manure into collection alleys
boards
Manure collection alleys •
Partial microbial decomposition
Frequent manure rer.�oval by flush or scrape;
Frequent checks and maintenance on waterers
and water pipes
Ventilation$exhaust fans •
Volatile gases;
maintenance;
•
Dust
V;ffolcientair movement
Ya
Indoor surfaces • Dust Wyacuum or washdown between flocks
Manure conveyors • Partial microbial decomposition J /Kcep mechanical equipment in good repair; rl G{s iq,,j
t9' Remove manure accumulations promptly�Q da'
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; O Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; O Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying 0 Basin surface mats of solids;
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Manure slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading;
0
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets
. Volatile gas emissions
0
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
0
proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure
• Volatile gas emissions while
0
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
slung or sludge on field
drying
0
Soil incorporation within 48hrs.
surfaces
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater 0 Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 6
e

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ' O Stump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions: Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; 0 Correct lagoon startup procedures;
! Agitation 113 Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
bT Minimum agitation while pumping;
13 Mechanical aeration;
tD Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; W Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles • Wind drift WMinimum recommended operating procedure;
IV/ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
0 Pump from second -stage lagoon
Dead birds a Carcass decomposition tY Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead bird disppsal pits • Carcass decomposition VComplete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
VProper location/construction of disposal pits;
6T Disposal pit covers tight fitting
Standing water around • Improper drainage; 670Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities • Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
_ Mud tracked onto public. • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information : Available From :
Poultry Manure Management; 0200 Rule1BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: High Rise, Deep Pit ; EBAE 13 1 -98 NCSQ - BAE
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: Undercage Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 130-88 NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE
Proper Disposal of Dead Poultry; PS&T Guide No. 19 NCSU - Poultry Science
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 7
Mi

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three.feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
❑ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. '106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
0
December 18, 1996

t3
w
a
0
0
v
Insect Con"I rheckfst for Animal Operations
Soure: L Csase
Flesh Guttels
Lagoons and Fk-i ' u
Growth
DWI, 90 Casti01 h3tth
Accsmtsiation ofwYWs -A3'Fiusb system is deslgmedwdopermed
aawkitntiy to lemoVeOCOMmutelcd soiids 6rom
s gotten as dulped.
'O'Ranove bn*IDS cf Sammuhtad sands at
main
and
pest breeding is appamst to sainimbe tte
crusting of calk tot: deph oft* mare thu, w -
6 Indies aver mono than 30% of urcfaca.
Decaying vegetation !' a Maiclah vegciative mtrol alk" bsnlcs of
lagoosssend atncr ut,poundmentl to prevem
wwriulation of dtcayfng vegetative make r
eiwsg watch edge an Impoundmoofs peiimeler,
Stbe Spedik k'MCCCes
Feeders __ Feed aVWwgo G Design, oQerAe and naalnlaln t'etd srsicrns(e.&,
Funkcrs autltroughs) to minku ne Ibe
acetanaiakiwi of decaying wastage.
o a Clean up spttlage on a routine buis (e.g., 7 - 10
day Interval 4-1 Ina ev w -• --- 1540 day twee real
dur�g winter). _
`^ Feed Storage ,.... W Accuakilaliom of feesf residues CI Redeye moisture accraentation wlihin sand
Q
N enatnid lmmedtateprArneurof feed storage
areas by insuring drninuge away from silo
cndlor pro%iriin g sdequale containmm? (e.g..
w covered b in for brew.aes grain ad sirniiar high
rtoloure greitt ptoducis).
© lrispea fervid remove or break up accumAated
solids In Mici ships around reed storage as
needed.
C7
m
N
O
AM IC - Novemb^Y ' 1, 4 h95. P agc i

i
as
a
0
u
v
V
O
to
OD
v
N
ea
N
tj
OD
H
r-1
a.
O
cV
Ci
O
Ssttrte Cause aktPs to Cenfml Imeets Slic Specific I'rsrlIces
Animal Inkling Antes • Acctinwh9iorn of aphid wastes Q
Ellaalnte low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastoge
1com and other locations where waste
ammulales and distarhance by aginals is
alinirrt�l.
CI
min fence caws uW filter strlps atrouad
.
ulirualhowing ereaslornialmizt
acmmlatlons ofwwtes(i.e., inspect for and
remove or break op accumulated solids as
souta�.
Dry Manure Handling • AccismuFatios,s of a4ma1 wasteg n
Rcuove spillage on a routine basis (eg , 7 - 10
Systems
davinlervat dr:r+naaurnmer: 15-3Dday iaterval
dRring winter) where manure is lords! far Wid
B+licaIIDa or dkpowl.
d
PrwAda for adequate drainage around rnaoum
stockpiles.
D
Inspect for and Temr,, o or break uy
wastes In filter strips around stockpiles and
- --,,rt handtine r-- a4 needed.
For more info[;...;Inn contact the Cur MIlve l? :,:ssian Service, Departnunt of Estmmnlogy, ]Box 7613, North Carofrre State University,
Rao 44 N , 2769S•7611
%,en 1i.........4. ry t tAnd h-nr 1

A:�i;��al V��fste 1'�anag�m}�rit�lan �.-���ification
'Please tvne or print all information that does not reouire a signature
W
General Information: '
Name of Farm: Ealrwn , .,al� Pal r-gre; Facility No:
Owner(s) Name: _ �;,, Rua/ __ _ Phone No:gi 7 - ZjZp,,I.
Mailing Address: 7302 �„ _ R� b/Ar74Aerr
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: bash
- Latitude and Longitude: 3 6' 07 3 V" I Zf . s 1 ' _a2f Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location"identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): on _w goo i m; le egg f of sale.,,, C 5 4 looa) _
Operation Descrintion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
El Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
a Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
• Boars
Type ofFoultry
iff Layer
a Pullets
No, of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
6. �O O Dairy
❑ Beef --
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application:. o Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds : 1 Total Capacity: A7 2 68 7, 9 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or 41�t) (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the' storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resotrrces Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land
Signature: / .. `fdj,_ EL _ _ Date: tz f 2 3 Z 22 .
Name of Manager(if different from owner): ,ire Rr�W
Signature: Date:
AWC- -- August 1, 1997

__ chnical Specialist Cerf .,ation' .
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
'.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
12 Existing, facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
ti Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
❑ New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation NBC S Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): 100f An Corr : AALrZv; %a . 6 S ZZgC4 Phone No.: 919 � ��9�M3f1S.
Signature: - - - Date:_ L7-12,1419-7_
B) Land Application Site (WU)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and- nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):�st1., Be __
Affiliation fir S _ Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): tood An Q%k= An •lle Phone No.: 9/7-y`�ff--�!!S
Signature: Date: I X42,197
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
W. Fmcility with(u e t 1 (5D or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): JE&tu L . & .
T—
Affiliation Usn!i NRtS - Date Work Completed: t
Address (Agency): a Phone No.:,
Sianature:_ - _ Date: / XA2h'7
AWC.-- August I, 1497 2

D). Annlication and Hand; � g EcLuipment.
Check the appropriate box
A. jig or expanding facility with_existing_waste application equipment (WUP or I) .
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field 'calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as pan of
the plan).
❑ New. guanded-or existiDg facility wilbout eiSistingmUte MlicatiolLgqui=gat for spraX inig 'on. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
f,] New.
1prav irrigation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in- the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic .or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L ..
Affiliation ClJQA A(Rc-Y Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): �L ~ le Phone No.:-9.L9-457
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Manaeement and I'?merency Action Plan SD
SI. WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): raaX L.
Address (Agency):
Work Completed:
`_Phone No.: ? q-4517— 6S'
Date:_ I4,iZ/2
F) Written Notice of New or F<xaandina Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21,1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public mad, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
In compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August I, 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection Stora a Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI) -
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as bpt not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet`br exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Aonlication Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
1@ The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system -
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation i5b4 . ANCS' Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):, lgW*�Z u4Yk�X,� Phone No.: �f�+YA'
Signature!
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checkeId. i
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical'Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 4

Q Runoff Controls from Ebi6rior Lots (RC)
Facilily wiLh exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
Forfacilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): '
Affiliation - Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Avnlication and HandIing-Eauipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the Appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate..
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of theplan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): /y, G4r' (.>4 o c k—
Affiliation 1_K o cV- -7'r2 ,W--ro l2 Date Work Cam
Address
Signatut
as
Z
No. :�2s-x)-*Z�3f V/i/
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD,.SI, WUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please 'Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

.ti
� 1
C) Runoff Controls from Ex.1-t-.rior Lots (RC)
" Facility_ with -exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no cerdfication is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation - Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Annlication and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or n
Check the appropriate block
0 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified. in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements.of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate..
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of theplan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): /'/, LEE Q,►2a c lL
Affiliation. c V r r2*r--To (Z _ Date Work
Address (Agency): 20 (d V- I J d A laa
Signa
No.: r33f �til
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M-D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify 'that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management _�SD,.SI, WUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 5

A
C 0 u N T Y
LM
36, 1 D,
1.4 4
Ila M"ton —, -3
IM 1501 TP p0l
Hkkory
tin
LU2
3D IM
J LIT - - -, LM
IM
Lm Vj IQ Sals
a I z
I \ LLU 4
t3a
t4
LM
Social urgon Swift Salem t
PA4
FA
Lin
q
1-3
um
Sim im "n
Hillard -ton mawd IMIL
OP. .2
(A
P. A- LIAI
L41X LL"
IM
1414 ft
IAU %.2 1.3
132* 1 MIN Rack
LW x %
11 4
7 it HM su4tt
4 1� 1.7 30
Jvo
t414 RED OAK LW
/:.0 LIU4 pop. 314 %
"S 1.4 U" LIM 4
Lin Im
LM CAT71E1040
"21 A im POP 632
FAS
Lap!suStale ttom 1576
6 — Im 7 ICOIAU - I'll 0
L419 Itiz Jam,!.79
(.0
JIM
I.y \L7R 1F9k h 'Y,. �_
Im
141Z A t 1 41
CINTEOLM OF SIASOARD IYSTIAO, IPAROAV
.7 • Lin♦ DOCCHPI
4
.t. .3Lm POP, 8113 tr-KTOPWAY ig K#4WWGECOMSE COUNTY
05 Hu -7
4,
Mu A
L
Union Hillc Cwk W2
HIM
OL
43
14 3
W&I"
LM MR
IM
qt 10 Lww
T-'-MROCKY MOUNT
POP. 41,203 �DCACDA%llf 17,07:1
i64
JJ43%9 -t 1
-.1 .. J.,
�
Lim
1?07
301
0. 7.1
1544
A,
tit0 t toll"
Jul
4.03
R
I)rr,
3S C11
1
9D.

9
I
THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON (LAYER)
CLIENTS NAME ______________ __-_-___> EDWIN REID
COUNTY --_____-- __--- __--__--____> NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TODAYS DATE 6CTOBER 28, 1996
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE => 1000 + FEET
NUMBER OF LAYERS' ___-- __--___-__> 64000
DEGREE OF ODOR CONTROL
(minimum 2.5 cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
(maximum 4.0 cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION ==========>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION ==_>
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION
Depth of Permanent Water 10.9
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume Required 640000.0
Permanent Volume Provided 714076.2
2.5
0.0 YEARS
473.5
FEET
173.5
FEET
92.1
FEET
80.0
FEET
81.2
FEET
feet
2.5:1
cubic feet
cubic feet
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET> 0 SQUARE FEET
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE ___-__---____-=_> 180 DAYS
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY ====> 0 GALLONS -
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION =_===> 7.7 INCHES
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =_-__- ____-=_> 6.6 INCHES
FREEBOARD =--_______________--__--____=> 1.0 FEET
Temporary Storage Volume 158611.7 cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 95.0 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 488 , 0 feet Width = 188 . 0 feet = 4r,''�y .0, G 1
Begin Pumping Elevation = 93.4 feet
Stop Pumping Elevation = 92.1 feet

STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
64000 LAYERS X 4 POUNDS
256000 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) 256000 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.160 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in layers.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 2.5 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 640000.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 92.1 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 81.2 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5_ 2.5 10.9
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
473.5 173.5 82152.2 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb
419.0 119.0 49861.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm)
446.2 146.2 65264.1 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. _ (AREA TOP + (4*AREA,MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
82152.2 261056.2 49861.0 1.817
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL = 714076.2 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 640000.0 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 473.5 FEET LONG BY 173.5 FEET WIDE

r
5. DIKE
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation 95.0 feet.
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
488.0, 188.0 91744 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 91744 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
.ti
GA. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 256000 SSLW * 0.008 gallon/lb. SSLW/day * 180 days
in the pumping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 49283.4 cubic feet
6B. Volume of excess water.
This is the amount of excess water usage (see tech. guide 633--83)
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping.
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
6C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) = 7.7 .inches
Volume = 7.7 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 58869.1 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.6 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 50459.2 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
GA.
49283.4
cubic
feet
6B.
0.0
cubic
feet
6C.
58869.1
cubic
feet
6D.
50459.2
cubic
feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 158611.7 cubic feet

7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Volume of temporary storage divided by surface
area of lagoon.
Depth required = •-158612" cu. ft. / 82152 sq. ft.
Depth required = 1.9 feet
Normal lagoon liquid elevation = 92..1 feet
Depth required - 1.9 feet
Freeboard - 1.0 feet
Top of Dam = 95.0 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION 95.0
ARE 488.0 FEET BY 188.0 FEET
8. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 49283.4 cubic feet
6B. 0.0 cubic feet
6C. 58869.1 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 108152.5 cubic feet
Depth required = Volume of pumped storage divided by surface
area of lagoon at normal water level.
Depth required = 108152.5 cu. ft. / 82152.25 sq. ft.
Depth required = 1.3 feet
DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: .DATE:

UAI OUa
WA
Aht
AnIAnt
Pt•h
I
AWN
AT
h'RA
A/'C
AV
nn'All
/A
Q'AA
AC•C
AI
AA11./1
/C?
CIRA
AQIC
at
f•UTVtiadu
14 dal
AA'A/T
TAP
P'hA
ARIA
/f
WAIT
1Fh
Q'QA
AC'/
Qt
WAIT
Alh
A•CA
OIA
CT
An•llr
Qlh
A'CA
APIA
by
nnIQQT
hAh
PICA
APIA
PT
AA'TQT
ITC
R'CA
APIA
VI
An•ACI
fie
T'QA
An•R
TT
AA'/Cl
hill,
C'QA
AQI/
nl
AA'VCI
/Ah
QIQA
ne'/
A
AA'hPl
AQP
h'CA
n/'R
R
AA'AA
AAV
I r'R'PA
A7'tlI
/
A211TTTdc !0
If01104
An'PA,
RAt
y`•1 C'PA
ACIAT
Q
An'/A
ARI
PICA
AA'R
C
AAIPA
VAT
A'CA
AT'A
h
AAIA6
T?
hICA
AIIA
P
MST
tale"
nn'PA
Ah
A'PA
ATITt
V
MUe1 Hal U1114 Oed 10 18U103
.
W URI
ARIA
AhT
AA'AAf
Pr'hAT PT'h
T
icim lllni
11OMH
I Q T n
A111
Ra fu RA
eLtTT13-tt"1 U3._ONI aLti-10-! USL-hI
u T
t a6ed n•P lan-un

Oh-ver s.0
Edwin Reid
jC-b Number ... . . .. il06
pc,int No.
12
4
J
b
/
B
CY
i l►
11
• 1.�
i4
i5
i b'
iG
i 'Y
20
X Coord .
1 .J . Ci J
i0i .24
i67. /4
1`Y/.88
1'YI.54
193.5Cj
i 9 i .0
i 93 02
i83. iC
166.56
i 02 .7 i
24. Y i
16 . MLA
1.62
4.46
. 38
5. i5
Y Coor❑ .
11.1 . / tj
iC.43
9.64
-b.9i
-3 i . 2Y
-i66.86
- 359 . 36
-454 . 3
-4//.06
-4@a . i 6
-"'4Ga.Ei
-4%5.35
--469 . / i
-4sb . ,?3
-2 6 . Yb
-96 . Y4
i3.5/
Distance from last point to first paint........
Length of path from first paint to last paint..
Total perimeter GT the boundary ................
Total area within the boundary............
Total area within the boundary ..................
1 Crl CU/ 76
ii.5 feet
feet
I ,Jc2n.I feet
92.440 . %' Sq . f t .
2. i acres

Edwin Reid
SCALE- i inch = i 6v feet
i
ki i
Y
Y
YI
Computed overall length =
632 f t .
i
rage i rioiien 1�1eb%Yb
i
i

Producer: _EDWIN REID
The purpose -of this'plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out
the routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the system. Good
maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.,
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
A 1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and
side slopes: FESCUE is
being established on these areas. Beginning in 1998 and
each year thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized
with 800 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of
all three. This will need to be done at least once each
year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth
of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to
be checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump
1

nnm
B. Operation .. 01'
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total
of _64000 caged layers. The lagoon contains both permanent
and temporary storage. The'permanent storage is not to be
pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The
design includes permanent storage of two and one-half cubic foot
per pound of steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of -the lagoon includes capacity
for the volume of waste produced over 180 days, the amount of
`r rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in
excess of evaporation. Your facility is designed for 180 days
of temporary storage; therefore, it will need to be pumped
every six months. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches elevation _93.4_ as marked by permanent markers. Stop
pump -out when the fluid level reaches elevation—92.1_.
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application. The waste material should be analyzed
before each application cycle to determine its nutrient content.
A soil test of the area of application should be made annually
to insure the waste is applied as reasonably and practically
possible to recommended rates.
If this is a new lagoon, it is strongly recommended that the
treatment lagoon be pre -charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent.
excessive odors during start-up. -Pre-charging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon thereby
reducing odors. Solids should be covered with effluent at all
times.
If this is an existing operation that is being brought up to
modern day standards and specifications, usually the lagoon will
not have adequate storage for sludge acclamation. It is
recommended that the lagoon is agitated and sludge land applied
in an environmentally safe manner every _2-3 years.
The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing
this law.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, M"w'A
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Aa
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary IDEEHNF;Z
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Edwin Reid
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
7302 Watson Seed Farm Road
Whitakers NC 27891
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
Facility ID #: 64-11
Nash County
hMAI-I'Mr-A
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System �4; Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission �An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Edwin Reid
7302 Watson Seed
Whitakers, North
Dear Mr. Reid:
A4
AAOPE% W4
IDIEHNFZ
Division of Water Quality
June 9, 1997
Farm Road
Carolina 27891
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Edwin Reid Poultry Farm
Facility # 54-11
Nash County
On June 4, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation.
This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to determine
compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management Regulations.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters of the
State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiency was observed:
Your waste lagoon had approximately 12 inches of freeboard which
is less than the amount required. Animal waste lagoons are required
to maintain enough freeboard so that no discharge of wastewater
will occur to waters of the State during any rainfall event less
severe than a 25 year\24 hour storm.
The above matter should be addressed to prevent the possibility of
an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice within 30 days
of receipt. You should include in your response the actions that
you will take to address these deficiencies.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Nil
� An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Edwin Reid
Page 2
This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These plans must be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
QKed.l Schuster, P.E.
'Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Patrick Rogers, Nash County Health Department
Mr. Terry Hest, Nash Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
NOD\64-11

Facility Number
Date of Inspection -y-9j
� ��
Time of inspection LL 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Registered ❑ Applied for Permit ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min S ent on Review
Farm Status: (' )) • P
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection !includes travel and nmeeccin.1
❑ Not Operational 1 Date Last
/Operated: ...... _.........................._................................................... _...... __.... __..... _......... _........................
Farm Name: C....(..kV. .^». �'„C' !'Ov/T,2 �i��— County:..o.:._:.' fJ......._......_........_....__.....__...._....
.............................................. ..
Land Owner Name: Cc! G/i n 2Lt.......................... __................_. ................, Phone No:.I.L. / y
Facility Conctact: JO L 1-1....................... Title:
Phone No:j.......y%s..............
Mailing Address:..Z �9fSt5rSCr� /�t� �LD �t/� fa(¢eS �C �`7/
_.................................................._........_...................... _.......................... _............... _...... _............... _....... ....... _.................
-M9JO/0- qc Integrator:_ ?I- Onsite Representativ�e/..........................._.............._y........_................................_......_._..............................................
Certified Operator: . Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm: S"2 1 j
Latitude =* =' = ° Longitude =* =, = .
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were [here any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No �0
❑ Yes 0<0
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [; .
❑ Yes 2
❑ Yes JQ N
El Yes o
Continued on back

Facility Numher:...
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Struchires LaUyns and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
!. ...... ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes .0 o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes J2ivu
Yes ❑ No
Structure 5. Structure 6
Waste Applicatign
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Wv p/4'n
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? IAI& is
19. Is there a tack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/ins ectio with on -site representative?
Fof Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes 2
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes 0-No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes fo
s
❑I No
El Yes
❑ Yes
0
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
L1Cammenfs,(refer toµguestion #� Explain any YES answers andlor'any�recoinmendations or any other comments � � "
se diawin szof facili to hettei ez lain situations: use additional a es as recess
w iY
t,1 k4-44 h a,►- /,0 •/.s . `l A4J C-VM SY�_4 ,6'0"-- Lq
S;a/—i ,5 ,9-n d Lr,. r / 4-,s/4 9 1-4, 4 -e.s
Reviewer/Inspector Name
-
ri ..
y};�.Fdb�.1c [ ......
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Lt,
��
Date: (-
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
October 9, 1995
Mr. Edwin Reid
Rt. 2, Box 94
Whitakers NC 27891
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Poultry Operation
SR 1500
Nash County
Dear Mr. Reid:
On September 7, 1995 Danny Smith of the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted an inspection of the subject animal operation.
This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Smith's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state
during the time of the inspection. Also, no manmade pipes,
ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of
willfully discharging wastewater) were observed.
However, Mr. Smith observed clear evidence that stormwater
from the top of your containment building is routed into your
lagoon, adding to the volume of waste that you have to manage. It
was also noted that your lagoon has little freeboard, less than 12
inches in some areas. This problem should receive prompt attention
to in order to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breach. A
properly functioning lagoon should have at least 19 inches of
freeboard.
In addition, Mr. Smith did not observe any wastewater
application equipment. Also, the fields adjacent to your facility
were not adequately maintained with a suitable cover crop for waste
application. Further, the nutrient impacted vegetation located
near your lagoon was a clear indication that wastewater has
discharged from your facility in past.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly; illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day.

Mr. Reid
Page -2--
Please respond in writing to this Management Deficiency
Notification no later than October 23, 1995. In your response you
should include a description of your current .waste management
practices (type of equipment, acreage available to apply
wastewater, frequency of waste application). In addition, you
should state what cover crops you currently use for land apply your
waste (e.g. Bermuda Grass, Fallow Field, Fescue etc.). Also,
please address the cause of past discharges of wastewater from your
facility.
Please, carefully address each of the aforementioned issues in
your response. Thank you for your assistance with this matter and
if you have any questions please contact Mr. Danny Smith or Ms.
Judy Garrett at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
/ds
H:\reidmdn
CC: Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Nash County Health Department
RRO - File Copy