Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050739 Ver 1_Complete File_20050503 , . o'f W A T/2,ty o~~. ... ..Oc:. (;f lJll.G))>' - I > - - .., O\..~"'" ~ Michael F, Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Dcpartment of Environment and Natural Rcsourccs Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Dircctor Division of Watcr Quality June 2, 2005 DWQ# 05-0739 Mecklenburg County Mr. Russell Ranson Crosland 227 West Trade Street, Suite 800 Charlotte, NC 28202 Subject: Ardrey Woods Subdivision . .' APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions Dear Mr, Ranson: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 0.47 acre of wetland in order to construct the Ardrey Woods Subdivision in Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 3, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o,enr,state,nc,us/ncwetlands, The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations, The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions: 1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas has commenced. 2. Stormwater discharges from the subdivision shall be diffuse flow intolthrough the floodplain. 3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance ot the 404 NjJ{thCarolina IVall/fIllI!! North Carolina Division ofWatcr Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 MooresviIle, NC 28115 Phone (704) 663-1699 Intemet h2o.enr,state.nc.us FAX (704) 663-6040 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper Customer Scrvice 1-877-623-6748 - Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h20,enr,state,nc,us/ncwetlands, 4. All wetlands, streams, surface waters, and riparian buffers located on the project site where impacts are not allowed shall be clearly marked (example- orange fabric fencing) prior to any land disturbing activities, 5. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) in order to compensate for the impacts to the wetland. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 2B ,0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program), the wetland impact shall not occur. Ms. Carol Shaw should be contacted at (919) 715-2227 if you have any questions concerning the EEP. You have one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. Foraccounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 0.47acre of wetland in the Catawba River Basin, (Cataloging Unit 03050103) for which mitigation is required. Please be aware that the EEP rules require rounding of wetland impacts to the nearest quarter acre (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b)), 6. No waste, spoils, solids, or fill of any kind shall be placed in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities associated with this project shall meet, andlor exceed, those requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and shall be conducted so that no violations of state water. quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. 7. Sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the Division of Land Resources has released the project. 8. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality. Please send photographs of the upstream and downstream sides of each culvert site to document correct installation, along with the Certificate of Completion form. 9. Continuing Compliance, The applicant (Crosland) shall conduct its activities in a manner so as not to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing, You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C, 27699-6714, This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721. Sincerely, D. 124 }~~ for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Attachments cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit David Caldwell, Mecklenburg, Water Quality Central Files Len Rindner ~~@illlnwm ~ JUN 7 ZOOS IJLiil\ - WArEH CU,\LiTt , \','ETVJ;:;S mD STCi\!,I:iil,1E:H UJJ.CH Triage Check List Date: 5/4/05 Project Name: Ardrey Woods DWQ#: 05-0739 County: Mecklenburg To: Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office 60-day Processing Time: 5/3/05 to 7/1/05 From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: (919) 733-9721 The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation. Please call if you need assistance. D Stream length impacted D Stream determination 'Wetland deternlination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps D Minimization/avoidance issues D Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman) D Pond fill D Mitigation Ratios Ditching D Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable? D Check drawings for accuracy D Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings? Cumulative impact concern D D D Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes, please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold, please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office, As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know. Thanks! Ardrey Woods Charlotte, Mecklenburg County. North Carolina Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentationfor NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO USACE alld NCDENR Prepared For Mr. Russell Rallsoll Crosland 227 West Trade Street, Suite 800 Charlotte, NC 28202 Prepared By: @&@&O~&P MAY 3 . 2005 L lien ~ENR . ~v. "'v.t'DsANDS';:;~~ QUAL/l"v . vro.flYA1r" ' r . "lI BRAt '"" It.., Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 (704) 904-2277 *Subject to verification by the USACE April 30, 2005 Page 1 of9 ~@i@@iUWI1l @ MAY 3 2005 Office Use Only: \' DENR. WATER QUALITY Form Version May 2002 l'ETUJiDSNJD STORJ..l'lVATER BRAt;.::/ USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. (If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "NI A".) I. Processing 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: X Section 404 Permit 0 o Section 10 Permit X 401 Water Quality Certification Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules Isolated Wetland Permit DWQ 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: 0 4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete section VIII and check here: See Attached 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: 0 II. Applicant Information 1. Owner/Applicant Information Mr. Russell Rallsoll Crosland 227 West Trade Street, Suite 800 Charlotte, NC 28202 Telephone Number: 70456- 5219 Fax Number: 704-5275181 E-mail Address: 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Leonard S. Rindner. PWS Company Affiliation: Environmental Planning Consultant Mailing Address: 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews. NC 28105 Telephone Number: 704 904 2277 E-mail Address:lrindnerrmcarolina.rr.com Fax Number: 7048470185 Page 2 of9 III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included, If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: Ardrey Woods 2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 4. Location County: Mecklenburg County Nearest Town: Charlotte Subdivision name (include phasellot number): Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached location maps 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.03270N, 80.81600W (WGS84/NAD83) USGS Weddington (Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing ofa distinct waterbody.) 6. Property size (acres): + 59.15 Acres 7. Nearest body of water (streamlriver/sound/ocean/lake): UT of Six Mile Creek and Six Mile Creek 8. River Basin: Catawba (Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr,state.nc.us/admin/maps/.) 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Undeveloped woodland in early to mid succession and former agricultural. 10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Proposed residential development. Typical land development machinery Page 3 of9 11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Lot and site preparation and road crossing, IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ill Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. Preliminary wetland and stream evaluation was conducted in conjunction with project 1Jlanning. Two meeting: were held with the USACE verify the extent of the jurisdictional wetlands and streams due to the unusual soil and site conditions. A meeting was also held with Alan Johnson on April 1. 2005 to discuss project impacts and stormwater requirements. The application reflects the preliminary discussions of these meetings Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. Additional impacts are not expected, v. Proposed Impacts to Waters ofthe United StateslWaters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: to prepare development areas and for a road crossing. Proposed impacts are necessary Page 4 of9 2. Individually list wetland impacts below: NA Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to Site Number Type ofImpact. Impact 100-year Floodplain" Nearest Stream Type of Wetland... (indicate on map) (acres) (ves/no) (linear feet) 1 NWP #39 0.47 ac no +/- 400' PSSINPFOIA . List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts, Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditehing/drainage. ete, For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. .. 10o-Year floodplains are idcntified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps, Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at http://w\vw,fema,l!ov. ... List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e,g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc,) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only), List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.75 acres Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.47 acre 3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below: Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or Site Number Type of Impact. Impact Stream Name" of Stream Intennittent? (indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specifv) . List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and nct loss/gain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, ete. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. .. Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps, If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest dO\\TIstream named stream into which it flows, USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at wWW.USl!S.l!OV. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g" WWW.topozone.com. www.mapqucst.com. etc,), Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:~ Page 5 of9 4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: N/A Open Water Impact Area of Name of Water body Type of Water body Site Number Type of Impact. Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, (indicate on map) (acres) (if applicable) bay, ocean, etc,) . List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts, Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage. bulkheads, etc. 5. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): D uplands 0 stream 0 wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., darn/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stonnwater requirement, etc,): Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area: VI. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and fmandal viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The project has been planned to preserve a significant forested buffer and wetlands within the Six Mile Creek floodplain. Impacts to wetlands are required to prepare development areas and correct soil conditions. as well as for economic feasibility in relation to the cost of the land, The existence of this wetland area proposed to be impacted mav be related to or significantly influenced by the discharge from an excavated pond fed by a well adjacent to the proiect area. Based on discussions with the USACE and the NCDENR. mitigation was considered to be an option in lieu of preservation of this wetland area. The remaining wetlands are preserved in restricted common open space. Page 6 of9 Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with l5A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h20.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ strmgi de ,htm I. 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. 2, Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at (919) 733-5208 to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP web site at http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/wro/index.htm. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): .50 acres @ 2:l/USACE Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): Page 7 of9 VII. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) NA Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes 0 No X If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEP NSEP A)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEP NSEP A document is required, call the SEP A coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes D No 0 If yes, has the document review been fmalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes 0 No 0 VIII. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) NA It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to detennine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )? Yes 0 No 0 If you answered "yes", provide the following infonnation: Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multipliers. Zone. Impact Multiplier Required (square feet) Mitigation 1 3 2 1.5 Total . Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (Le., Donation of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration I Enhancement, Preservation or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate infonnation as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or ,0260. Page 80f9 IX. Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. Based on an analysis by the project engineer (see attached) of the development area (excluding the floodplain) the impervious area is proposed to be less than 30%, Stormwater will be discharged into the large floodplain into plunge pools or similar devices in order to significantly reduce velocity and to allow diffusion into the floodplain. Since Six Mile Creek has a substantial riparian berm, it is expected that wetland areas may with the additional stormwater input. x. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Municipal Svstem- CMU XI. Violations (required by DWQ) NA Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes 0 No X Is tltis an after-tlte-fact permit application? Yes 0 No X XII. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e,g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened S cies, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). Applicant/Agent's Signature Dat (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 9 of9 TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map Page 1 of 1 ;.-l /1 ---- " . \ '. \ ". ~ \~ i ''-,.. \,c'~ '. '. ",.,;a. . '. '- 'l:t;t. '.,:--":' f!> ..-".................. 60(} ',~, "'" ,..., ~~... / )t-~-:;... ,/ .I ....~~..~"';r.'~ ( '~'''""l \ / /0- ~);. -\, ,. \: --{ ;;:',' 1/ -- ~9 {i3Ii'i 1'.. _~_~'ii-~.i'~{, ~_._\ ""i:..... I. ' ...~~.;:;::~ I" _' .." \ .-----~/'.-'.'.I ~ / " . " I' ~ :-.:\.'/ .. 'j I, " .~".~_.. ..... .-- /~~\ (('. r \\'\ ) "~'\ \ , (--...~~ 'u" r--:-............ I ) _ '" .-. \ " ( (-", ,.., ....., ,-,;-" \ '\ \. " ,-~., . '\'~ \( r \-' .:~ \ '- \ ,....\ \ . I, I. .. . /. o 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 krn '" M=-7.089 G=O.106 o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 rni Map center is 35.02370N, 80.81600W (WGS84jNAD83) Weddington quadr~ngle Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z= 17 &n=387 5686.00009089&e=516784&s=48&size... 4/23/2005 0, .830ft r~ 0__ MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS .- . "''''''-'; ,-~-----..~--, ~ ., ~" f NRCS SOIL SURVEY ~C~TI?\~T;7:~~~' - ~ . I..! / c,' _,- "r:c,~, :',. - :c!~i~'ll/ .. \) / '. : '--, i ! i. I : : ,--- '. i ~ \ /,-' ih\ 1'>,1< ~S c _<~ ,< ,~_ ~ _<.~0.~ <~<;;::<;ir""'nlA~. ~'--~' 'I;.y ~ry v v · ~ I i~' J~~\\ .~ , - -4; "}II 41 ,,~ .-'.~.. ,.L, 1"'" ,..i... ,1-o...2l ~L I '.:j / /1,S 194 191 1112 191 . 190 I "",Ii .. - .-. . ., ... -=--~ "- .. 7'~~~S:~':~ ~"1~~'~> ~ 'd .~~1 7;; ~,~, ~.t~",.;':~.: ~.~~. "2~'!',a; '~lies;, #,//1 '.c~~~..'f..". . , I &70. f' ' III il . '\ .~4 ~\\ Y , '::" l ~. -: _" ,I F! ~~. ,~"<J / , ." ;,' . '~' I~ ~ ~"~ ':;i~. ~'; 116 ~\il"""\m...>> ~ " .._ ",'c- .,', ~ Iii .... - It:'). :5j-S~ 1 ,,' '" \ t.\~ I~\ "N:#1;?&3 A" l<:J.,' \ .,L.;....~ ~ ~"''"''~-.. .IJ~'" .", I ~ i'" .:"99. \ ;l I l .~ JJ"':>' ",[j,l, .' ::J~\ " '"(;::13...:.. \137., ~;..;r",. ~,c.~...' " ._.. .__ __,_ ... -- Ii" '" I ~,!i /u/ ._,'~1 ~~;~,~ ~~ ,~~; '.;"\ l\l";::~~:\~~'~:':\ ':-. ,- ..'" '/ ~- - .- ~... .r:.. '~..': h~/ ~.~ <;.1 ~ . "'.174ft., i-r..ot ~ iJ~~'-(;~''I~!l\ '\,..;;.~...~ -- ~ ' ,~61,r/A1 "1\ '~ 0:-~;'" '~:~~;;":~~:':h'~' .YJ'tl~Y~'::' ,,::'::J1}~u~:.. ~~~I?;"";J ~~'\'~Il~l~;~~~~~,,~ ;''''J.)v?A. . /-i.~:~.t:- ' I /:(j~ ....,.~?:J;i /J.'I'""c~" \111117t11"\I6'\~~\~~'~. \.' .Il'-....n."."_~~;., . .dA"\:.....; ; //,/' :' ,"'" l"""'-j'~~' . :..-./. ,'~ ,121 ~ N III ." ..' '> -PO. ~'.it"/'... ~ \ )0 \ ' ~~t. ~\:....A.--'A ,,:'j 'rl ',.I(J" .; I . i ';..,... --- ~ / ~. , .' I \ ;"\~~ ;';,)/~ r . ~,.'-'=--~...~~. 'w.J..:J., "\iiiiil ;.I'-'~"., 1 \\...., <;'" '" ~ .J-' -- ,;.J.,:r "c i!if': I. '. ~ Ill) y.. ...y:.../J' , . .z/~' \ ~f{~.~.,.~.. ~~~. /1"'67-: ~~. ';1; v~~.", ~ """', '.. '~'. ,',". '09 ,10' ,01 106 '0; I~"~'~-A I :.J.n8 , ';.., ~ .l.l. "".111' ,. " III 't. " -~ .,.~ \ I '~;';il)i , " 110 . , ; f(\' ...... " '" , 1l7"c... r~'" 11. 1 ' ,~. ,J I, 7<r, 1~t1---:- 1&'_ :.:,' , "', \ ~" } ..' . ....:.. _ lU III II< '!~ . .c.... ......,... < , " '" ,. ..... '.~ .........."It" OJ' .,' , -- ~ r~.' .. . ~ - .~ :IJI~ ~', ~'''~'1'' '.,_ ~{L ~"" . i~',,', l1 ;(t~x~"~~ ~.~ ~ .~:... ~ J ~"J\\,," II" '-;k..~~~, "-'~ . ,...&~ \~'\ ~..<:v..:-'..:..:~.. .. 't I ~t ~~ ",'ll ~~"r.l.. lrl..,' ~ !"\\I.Il\. .\J' '~ ...." 1\ .I:{ \ ~'" ~ 115 ,IS. "":-:-'r;.':". r' pTaialWcrl.od ~'\) ..;, .." -- '1 ~ :'(1 t/ ~'" .... . ' .53 151 ,-i O;-51lmpacr-o.o30Ac. /'~.. \ 14..... ' ' ....... 0 '- .... ...." L_ ~ ISI, .\i1~'" ~,~ . . .. . """ ~ .:;:;:L-.:J~ .:?;'- ~)' \ ~ \'.~ \~,..~~. '. .': " :- :' - FORESTED PRESERVATION AREAS I I.'. '" ~ ' --..c....:l--. .J; , \\~.~ 'P" :;...,r._ -,..../,../\ h' ' , - ....::;h~...:.,. ~'-'::IY ','" 1B . " ..~.~::.- > . - - '~.x:' ;}i-i'; ".- ~~~ ~" \'~ \r~.~;~ -; c FORESTED PRESERVATION AREAS TURNBULL . SIGMON DESIGN .. ust 'or .tIandJ ~ Impacted Wedands D.,';j Wedands to Remain \ - \ \ \\ \ Q9 :!:O.47 AC. WETLAND IMPACT PROJECT NUMBER: 04-185 ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05 "9:; . . Tumbull Sif"'oo Cuign '? 1001 Mo..h..d Squar. ! .. . Driv., Sui'" 530 " <. "",:: Charlot... NC28~03 ';; ......" .' Phon.. 70".5~9.65oo -":.. Fax, 70",5~~.088~ Crosland DESIGNED BY: Ardrey Woods NO. DATE: BY: REVISIONS: LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SERVICES 227 WEST TRACE ST SUITE: 800 CHARLOTTE. NC CITY OF CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan 1 SHEET NO 5 OF ~\ '1 1if l : '.l!1': ~ \ ~ . ~, ":., 1\ " ':.,\ , 't' ,~?~~ . -........:.~ , II i: ---.... '- I /'.~~ ~.:) : \. , , :/ ':i"'. '.."..: .,. / .~ ~ . I :\; { ,..;oJ, ~~. PRO...lECT NUMBER: 04-185 Crosland D Impacted Wetlands r;.~D Wetlands to Remain ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05 . '9"~'-' Turnbull Sigmon D...ign .(J 1001 Morehe~d Square .- "; Drive.. Su.ite 530 .' . ',.... Charlatte, NC 28203 (,.....",.,' , Phone, 704-.529,6500 '.<< .., F..., 701,522.0882 DESIGNED BY: Ardrey Woods LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SERVICES 227 WEST TRACE ST SUITE: 800 CHARLOTTE:. NC NO. DATE: BY: REVISIONS: CITY OF" CHARLOTTE: NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan 2 5 SHEET NO OF' TURNBULL. SIGMON DESIGN / ..YJ ~ .!J 195 194 193 192 v L~. I: . ,; \.--. - 00 i '__,:n;._,.. ---- ,,:',; -,'. 'w . : +--... -.' -.\ , , - '~-,49 . @_I __ --~ , " . ' -,- """ \ \ PROJECT NUMBER: 04-185 Crosland ~ Impacted Wetlands P{l Wetlands to Rc:.main ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05 /9....... Turnbull Sigmon Design le; 1001 Morehead Square " .; Drive. Suile 530 " · .'''.- Charlotte, NC 28203 < :'_ _.<,;'.' Phone, 70'~,529-6soo _ ,... Fa%' 70~.522.o882 DESIGNED BY: Ardrey Woods NO. DATE: BY: REVISIONS: LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SERVICES 227 WEST TRACE ST SUITE 800 CHARLOTTE. NC CITY OF' CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan 3 5 SHEET NO OF ) TURNBULL ..- J' ....... r;. '; :. .....! i I! .~~9-M:qN .DESIGN r"#/; , ,c-. .-" ,j !I i': 11 I "fi -./ \ --.... :' ~ ,~ ,', \ . \ ~\~ ~ @ : . ~.:~ --.-., -.' .\ ..'1 PROJECT NUMBER: 04-185 ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05 DESIGNED BY: . ,;:9;':c.. Turnbull Sign>cn Design ,:,c, 1001 Morehead Square i',. . '." Drive. Suite 530 .' . . . " ',' Charlotte, NC 28203 ':,:' .. ,'. . Phone, 704.529.6500 '. _ ' Fu: 704.522.0882 Crosland D Impacted Wetlands Pi"U Wetlands to Remain Ardrey Woods NO, DATE: BY: REVISIONS: LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SERVICES 227 WEST TRADE ST SUITE 800 CHARLOTTE. NC CITY OF CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan 4 5 SHEET NO OF ';\ I / \ TURNBULL . SIGMON DESIGN I I;; I \ , I ; II \.( ~\ :~I \~I I!~ I cP ~.~'<<';I ~., <'~<J I I I \ \ I I ~ I I' :, . ~;y) j . ) ~ / a.Jf / / ~ ,f' ~,~ / v ~ HI / -'l /. i Iff:, /~/y;~ > \. ~~I\ // ~ ~~; en ~ ./ / ~ :/ . . ~ g: Cil e / / / j ~~: I.g~' /~/~ /r : ;o~ ~/, ! I :2 ~ / / .. I I .///. I v--:'-/ / : :f'/ /rL. . I / / I. / / I --....../ Exist Wedands ~ 25 26 ~ g i~ .... ---.~i _:-...: , , ;91: :i U '()Q .. . " 61 .. 62\ I \ ' 'l, I,' :1 r t ,! L ',11 l T IK. . ~ '"' ._Ja: . " [jf: )"r.16: ! - r rnI -- r llll. Ridgeforest Dr '" '" , ~3"-: :~4 ", ':ID95 .. , ' II i '-1' ,.- "i : _' ~__,.._ .___ L_._ / @ c .. '''U,'> ,'__' 0' .LJ!J'~ '-~=22 PROJECT NUMBER: 04-IB5 Crosland D Impacted Wetlands P::";:.:l Wetla.nds to Remain ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05 "_g"'"'' Turnbull Silmon Dui&n /i' 1001 Mor~h<&d S'Iuar< ;';. Drlvo, SUllO 530 , : .:: Cbarlo'te, NC~8~OJ ',:".,..,,,".,' Phone. 70i-.5~9.6soo ....<.,.. '. .' F... 70-\-.52~.0&&~ DESIGNED BY: Ardrey Woods NO. DATE: BY: RE:VISIONS; LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SERVICES 227 WtST TRACt ST SUITE: 800 CITY OF CHARLOTTE: CHARLOTTE, NC NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan 5 5 5HE:ET NO OF .. ... . .. ....... ........ .. ......~ TURNBULL. SIGMON DESIGN <S> Mr. Len RIndner 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 Subject: 30% Impervious Surface Calculations for Ardrey Woods Subdivision Dear Mr. Rindner, The following breakdown is for the maximum allowable impervious area for the Ardrey Woods Subdivision in Charlotte, NC. Ardrey Woods is a resIdential single-family subdivision containing 196 lots on a total of 59.51 acres. The following is a detailed breakdown of how the allowable impervious areas were calculated: Total Site Area 59.51 Acres Less Community Encroachment (10,18) Acres Flood Una Net Site Area 49.33 Acres Net Sauare FootaQe 2,148814 sa ft 30% Imoervious Allowable 644 644 sa ft Less Developer Installed 208,503 sq ft Includes roads and Imcervious Areas curb and Qutter Remalnlna Impervious Area 436,141 soft Total Lots 196 Impervious Area Allowed I Lot 2,225.2 sa ft Note: The developer has not selected a specific homebuilder bullder or home style at this time. It is expected that based on similar projects In the area In which 2,993 SF was allotted (Wynfield Forest) for 70' wide lots and 2.285 SF was allotted for 50' and 60' lots (Brookmere), that the avemge available impervious area is a reasonable allowance per lot At these other projects locations the actual bullt upon area was well short of the "allotment". The largest Ardrey Woods lot Is 60' wide so it Is reasonable to conclude the homes will be smaller than those in Wynfield Forest and of slmllar size to those in Brookmere. Feel free to contact rne with any questions concerning the calculations above or if any further infonnation is required for ~~(\~m~/1 ..,...... ~\'\ CAROl ~ I", .:0 O'('o~.~~ - -:. Thank-you, S' (J' G~SSIO,l~"" ~ g ~~ ~) ~ () 4 = Q; SEAL ; ~~ : 23505 g ~ "P. ~~. ~~Q;.1. ~ f -:,. ,~ R-~ Robert E Tripp. PE ~ ...",,, Project Manager "'111 IIII~"'\\\\' LanJ IhvtIopmtnt Duign &MJicu 1001 MQrthtad Si\larr Drivt Suitt 530 Char/otu, NC 28203 Phon" 70~-529-6500 Far: 70f-522-088:z tIImbullsigmon.coDl IN 30% ATTACHED IMPERVIOUS FLOODPLAIN N CALCULATI OT INCLUDED ON-SEE Areas rem d ove from total site INTO LARGE L...f"L.--.J o ~~ \J:J . ,CroWnJ . ~lGMUN DESIGN LAND CE:VE:LOPME:N T CE:SIGN SE:RVICE:S ~ Ardrey Woods CITY O~ C N HARLOTT~ ORTH CAROLINA Impervious Ax Calculations ea Map PROJE:CT NUMBE:R' ISS . 04-165 UE: DATe: .. II 05 CE:SIGNeD BY: RE:T NO. DATE.: BYI RrYlSlONS: 1 aj::jfi"f"No I --or LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS Environmental Planning Consultant ProCessional Wetland Scientist Land Planning 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 Tele: (704) 846-0461 Fax (704) 847-0185 April 24, 2005 Ms. Carol Shaw NCDENR- North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 Fax - 919.715.2219 Re: Ardrey Woods - Residential Development, Charlotte, Mecklenburg, NC Crosland - Wetland Mitigation Dear Carol: On behalf of my client, Crosland, we are requesting acceptance to utilize the NCEEP to meet mitigation requirements when the permits arc issued by the USACE and the NCDWQ for wetland impacts due to the proposed development. Proposed wetland impacts will require mitigation requirements for at least 0.50 acres of proposed wetland impacts. The USACE may require a 2:1 ratio. The cataloging unit is 03050103 (Six Mile Creek/Catawba Basin). Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Thank you for your consideration. eonard S. Rindner, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant CC: Mr. Russell Ranson Crosland 227 West Trade Street, Suite 800 Charlotte, NC 28202 . ll'l LiCU r CC .l~.rA~U.c,:).1 rv~vJ. - ~o- NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM (revised 3/29/05) Fill in information, print, sign, and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699- 1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable to clarify information on the form. 1. Name of Applicant or Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Actent · 2. Name of Business · Environmental Planning Consultant . 3. Street Address · 3714 Spokeshave Lane 4. City I State, Zip · Matthews, NC 28105 5. Telephone · ( ~ ) 1904 _\2277 6. Fax (~) 847 - 0185 7. E-mail \Irindner@carolina.rr.com 8. Project Name · Ardrey Woods 9. Project Location · Charlotte, NC 10. Lat-Long Coordinates Lat 35.0237 North Long 80.8160 West 11. River BasIn · Catawba (Six Mile Creek) 12. Cataloging Unit (8-digit) 03050103 ... 11. Project County. Mecklenburg ,j 14. Riparian Wetland 0.50 acre lmoact (ac) · 15. Non-Riparian Wetland NA- Imoact (a c) · 16. Coastal Marsh Impact AA- (a c) · 17. Stream-Cold Impact (ft) jJ.k . 18. Stream-Cool Impact (ft) I-/,A . 19. Stream-Warm Impact j-JA- (ft) · 20. .. Buffer-Zone 1 Impact f-J,br- (SQ ft) · 21. .. Buffer-Zone 2 Impact )-JJ::v (sQ ft) · 22. .. Buffer-Total (Zone 1 + fJ A-- /7 Zone 2) (sa ft) · Attachments? ~es Sig:~rAgent: Date: ~ Lvt-lv- "V' ~ ____ * Re uired information; zero answers iR'14-22 should De indicated with "0" or "N/A", not left blank. q .. Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba River Basins and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed. *** Go to EPA "Surf Your Watershed" !lttR:"cfpul>-,-~p~-,-9Q'!jsurflI9J~alelinde2<,cfm for CU determination. Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205 or g3[ol.'-sh~@IlGn]au.net http://www.nceep.net/news/reports/forms/ILFform.htm 4/23/2005 rage 1 or i Len Rindner From: Carol Shaw [carol.shaw@ncmail.net] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:31 AM To: Len Rindner Subject: Re: ardrey woods Yes, I did receive that request. I was out of the office Wednesday and Thursday. I will try to get the reply out today, but it may be Monday. Thanks, Carol Len Rindner wrote: Carol: Just wanted to confirm that you got the request for wetland mitigation from earlier in the week. Thanks, Len 4/3012005 LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS Environmental Planning Consultant ProCessional Wetland Scientist Land Planning 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 Tele: (704) 846-0461 Fax (704) 847-0185 April 23, 2005 Ms. Amanda Jones U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers - Reg. Field Office 151 Patton Avenue - Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006 He: Ardrev Woods + 60 Ac, Charlotte, NC Dear Ms. Jones: On behalf of my client, I am requesting written confinnation of the wetland/stream delineation for the subject property. Project Name: Acreage: City/County: LonglLat: Developer: Ardrey Woods :t 60 Acres Charlotte, Mecklenburg County 35.02370N, 80.81600W - Weddington Mr. Russell Ranson Crosland 227 West Trade Street, Suite 800 Charlotte, NC 28202 Contact: Leonard S. Rindner, PWS General Wetland Classification and Deseription The site is adjacent to the floodplain of Six Mile Creek in the Catawba River. Headwater wetlands occur primarily downstream of a small pond ofT the property. The site also contains intennittent and perennial tributaries streams and adjacent wetlands. Pockets of wetlands occur within the large floodplain. The site is within a Water Classification - C watershed. The current land-use is fonner or current agricultural land and woodland. The riparian wetland areas can be classified as Palustrine Broad Leaved, Scrub Shrub and Emergent (PFOIA, PFOIC, PSSIA, PEMIC). The site includes Iredell and Monacan soils. These soils are map units which may have inclusions of hydric soils according to the Natural Resource Conservation Service, Technical Guide- Section II-A-2, June 1991. if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you for your Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Professional Wetland Scientist DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project I Site: Holt Property Date: 11 /04 Applicant I Owner: Crosland County: Meek Investigator: Len Rindner State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes-X- No_ Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes - No-X- Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes - No-X- PlotlD: -1 (explain on reverse if needed) sloping areas adj. to lOB" VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Acer rubrum T FAC 9. Fraxinus americana --I..- FACU 2. Liquidambar stvraciflua T FAC+ 10. Quercus phellos T FACW 3. Liriodendron tulipifera. T FAC 11. Ulmus americana --I..- FACW 4. Juniperus virginiana T F ACU- 12. Smilax rotundifolia -L- FAC 5. Comus florida T FACU 13. Toxidodendron radicans -H- FAC 6. Prunus serotina S FACU 14. - 7. Ulmus alata T F ACU- 15. - 8. Lonicera iaponica H FACU- 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). >50% Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greatcr than 50% of the Plant Spccics are/are not Classificd as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Spccies that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken near wetland area M HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Aerial Photographs Other Wetland Hydrology Indicators No Recorded Data Available Primary Indicators: _ Inundated _Saturated in Upper 12" _ Water Marks _ Drift Lines _ Sediment Deposits -X- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators: _ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" _ Water-Stained Leaves ..lL. Local Soil Survey Data _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA.1ln.) Depth to Saturated Soil: + 12"Jin.) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Iredell Drainage Class: Well Drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes..lL No_ Profile Description: Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, /Inches) Horizon (Munsell Molstl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-8 A 10YR 5/3 4/2 Sandy clay loam 8-16 -1! 5YR 5/8 Sandy clay loam dense clav Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol - Concretions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils - Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed On Local Hydric Soils List _ Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List -1L Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Yes -K.. No Yes No ..2... Yes No ..2... Is the Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes_ No..lL Remarks: Location (deseribe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Anny Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Somewhat poorly drained areas adjacent to wetlands (field verified by USACE on 3/8/05) DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) Project I Site: Holt Prooerty Date: 11/04 Applicant I Owner: Crosland County: Meek Investigator: Len Rindner State: NC Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Ycs--X- No - Community 10: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes_ No---X- Transect 10: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes - No---X- Plot 10: --2 (explain on reverse if needed) Wetland Area B . VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Fraxinus oennsylvanica T FACW 9. Juncus effusus H FACW 1. Acer rubrum T FAC 10. Carex sp H FACW 2. Liquidambar stvraciflua T FAC+ 11. Platanus occidental is T FACW 3. Salix nigra T OBL 12. Ligustrum sinensis S FAC 4. Ulmus americana T FACW 13. Toxidodendron radicans H FAC G. Comus amomum S FACW 14. Juniperus virginiana S FACU- 7. Quercus phellos T FACW 15. Ulmus alata T FACU- 8. Camosis radicans S FAC 1G. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100% Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Prescnt Based Upon Greatcr than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken... Wetland Area "HH" HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Aerial Photographs Other Wetland Hydrology Indicators No Recorded Data Available Primary Indicators: _ Inundated -----x-Saturated in Upper 12" -X Water Marks --X- Drift lines -----X- Sediment Deposits --X- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators: --L Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12" --X- Water-Stained Leaves --X- Local Soil Survey Data _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Free Water in Pit: near surface J!n.) Depth to Saturated Soil: less than 12" -<in.) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Iredell Drainage Class: PD Taxonomy (Subgroup): Hydric Inclusion Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No-1L Profile Description: Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-6 A 10YR 5/2 I OYR 4/4 distinct - medium. sandy clay loam I OYR 6/1 10 YR 4/4 distinct - medium sandy clay loam 6- 16 B 10YR 6/4 clay Hydric Soil Indicators: - Histosol ~ Concretions _ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils - Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime -1L-Listed On Local Hydric Soils List _ Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List --X. Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETI-ANO DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes -1L No - Is the Sampling Point Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -1L No - Within a Wetland? Yes-L No - Hydric Soils Present? Yes -1L No - Remarks: Location (describe) is/is Dot classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Anny Corns of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland areas subject to high seasonal water table perched over dense clay layer. ""'''~'''b''. I \ ... . ''':J~''~ e ~ "-1> f,") / \ ~ ~ "'t.t- ~() / . / i .i lJ ,.., ~ .......)l> "59 @ '-j~~ -^-- .. ME.GKLENBURG ~~ ~ ,....,...!.I_.~ .... 0 ALL WETLANDS IN FORESTED AREAS. WETLAND FLAGGING IS BLUE Fl-10 Gl-6 ~/) Hl-9'/ \ \.. r / El-8 ~ Q. 7. ,~ft WETLAND SURVEY LOCATION MAP ~ov 23 04 08:048 RANSON 704-365-5649 LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS Environmental PWming Coo.,wtant Professional Wetland Scientist Land PlaoniDg 3714 Spokeshave Lane MaUhews, NC 28105 Tclc: (704) 846-{)461 Fax (704) H47-o185 November 22. 2004 Mr. Russell Ranson Crosland 227 West Trade Street, Suite 800 Charlotte. NC 28202 Re: Wetland Consultation - Holt Property Tax Parcel 10 22937503 - Near Ardrey Kell Road and Community House Road, Charlotte, NC - A2ent Authorization Letter Dear Russell: In order to interface with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources I will need your authorization. Please sign the foUowing statement: This letter authorizes Leonard S. Rindner, PWS as our firm's agent in matters relatetl to Waters of the V.s. and Waters of North Carolina for the referencetl project site. TlIis includes interfacing with the-.Vnr States Army Corps of Engineers and the North carolin~;p' ertp;tN).' am esources. ~/~V~ I I ,/' 1/;"' .. -~ 11/;:i5/oY Mr. Russell Ranson - Crosland Date Please contact me if you have any questions or require additiolll11 explanation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Leonard S. Rindne:r, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant Profession Wetland Scientist , ,,' / ." j~ t i i ! , , ',I ',j! .' 8 North Carolina Wildlife Resources COlnmission ~ Richard B. Hamilton, Executivc Director MEMORANDUl\l FROM: Cyndi B. Karoly, Supervisor 40 I Oversight and Exprcss Pcnnits Unit NCDWQ Wetlands and Stonnwatcr Branch .,:/,d 1':X:1 Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator / Habitat Conservation Program m&J@~UW@@ MAY ] G "01;5 TO: ". OpJH;,WATfrW0/'LllY ..~w.DJ/"O o TOi\MWATER C,V-J:Of DATE: May 13,2005 SUBJECT: Review of an application Ardrcy Woods, Unnamcd Tributary Six Mile Crcck, DWQOS0739, Mccklcnburg County Thc applicant is rcqucsting 404 PCffilits from the US Army Corps of Enginecrs and a 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project area. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clcan Water Act of 1977 (33 U,S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amcnded; 16 U.S.c. 661-667d). The project is to develop woodland into a residential subdivision. Impacts are proposed to 0.47 acres of wetlands, These impacts appcar to be associated with a road crossing and individual lot fill. Somc wetlands are indicated to be preserved closer to Six Mile Crcek. Based on our review of the project submittal, it appears that impacts for the roadway are not avoidable; howcver, the lot fill does not appear to be nccessary or water dependcnt. Although we were not able to visit the site and current site conditions are not known, we will not object to a 40 I water quality certification or 404 pennit providing the following conditions arc implcmcntcd: 1. Wctland fill to make individual lots should not occur. Thcse areas can be integrated into adjacent wetlands and maintained or restored to natural conditions for water quality and habitat values \\hich will be diminished or destroyed through urbanization. TIlese arcas should be preserved and protccted as common areas instead of being subdivided into individual lots. 2, To the extcnt possiblc, unavoidable impacts should be mitigated on site by natural dcsign (bioenginccring) stream relocation and/or with stoffil\\'ater managemcnt best managcment practiccs that mimic cxisting hydrological conditions. Post development conditions should Mailing Address: Division ofInland Fisherics . 1721 Mail Scrvice Ccntcr . Ralcigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 733-3633 . Fax: (919) 715-7643 /' . Ardrey Woods 2 l\Iay 13,2005 roughly equal those conditions found on the site prior to development. Low Impact Development (LID) techniques are encouraged and recommended for the site. Information about LID site evaluation techniques and stonnwater measures and practices can be found at \\\\\\ .10\\i 111 P:lctelcvc lopl11cn t .on~. Pollution controls and storm\vater management practices for the site should adhere to all conditions specified in NCDWQ or USEPA stOfll1\\ater permits, 3. Remaining jurisdietional waters should be permanently preserved with undisturbed forested butTers of a width that meets the rccommendations (minimum of 50' for intermittent channels and 100' for perennial channels) found in our Guidance Memorandum to Address Cumulative Impacts to Address and Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife Resources and Water Quality (August 2002) which can be found at: h!!p:/ 1\\\\\\. nc\\i lei I i kOI"!'/p!107 \Vi lei Ii fcSpccicsC on/p'~ 7 c3 i 111j1:lcts. mlt'. 4. Whcre undisturbcd forestcd buffcrs, wetlands, and/or floodplains arc prescnt, permanent dccd rcstrictions or conservation easements are reeommended. Where forested butTers are not prescnt, they should be restored and preserved as undisturbed forested areas \\henever practical. TIIese areas should be permanently protected just like stream buffers, Forested areas and any preserved butTers should not be subdivided into smaller subdivisions or made into portions of individual lots, TIIank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 336-769-9453. Ce: Amanda Jones, USACOE Alan Johnson, DWQ-MRO