HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050739 Ver 1_Complete File_20050503
,
. o'f W A T/2,ty
o~~. ... ..Oc:.
(;f lJll.G))>'
- I
> -
- ..,
O\..~"'"
~
Michael F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Dcpartment of Environment and Natural Rcsourccs
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Dircctor
Division of Watcr Quality
June 2, 2005
DWQ# 05-0739
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Russell Ranson
Crosland
227 West Trade Street, Suite 800
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: Ardrey Woods Subdivision
. .'
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr, Ranson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
impact 0.47 acre of wetland in order to construct the Ardrey Woods Subdivision in Mecklenburg
County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on May 3,
2005. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water
Quality General Certification Number 3402, which can be viewed on our web site at
http://h2o,enr,state,nc,us/ncwetlands, The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including
those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water
Supply Watershed regulations,
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and
design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in
writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property
is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter; and is thereby
responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following
conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact
areas has commenced.
2. Stormwater discharges from the subdivision shall be diffuse flow intolthrough the floodplain.
3. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional
wetlands and waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds on the property. These
mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance ot the 404
NjJ{thCarolina
IVall/fIllI!!
North Carolina Division ofWatcr Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 MooresviIle, NC 28115 Phone (704) 663-1699
Intemet h2o.enr,state.nc.us FAX (704) 663-6040
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Scrvice
1-877-623-6748
-
Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the
401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h20,enr,state,nc,us/ncwetlands,
4. All wetlands, streams, surface waters, and riparian buffers located on the project site where impacts
are not allowed shall be clearly marked (example- orange fabric fencing) prior to any land disturbing
activities,
5. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
in order to compensate for the impacts to the wetland. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and
15A NCAC 2B ,0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements
under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until the EEP receives and clears your
check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program), the wetland impact shall not
occur. Ms. Carol Shaw should be contacted at (919) 715-2227 if you have any questions
concerning the EEP. You have one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment.
Foraccounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 0.47acre of wetland in the Catawba
River Basin, (Cataloging Unit 03050103) for which mitigation is required. Please be aware that the
EEP rules require rounding of wetland impacts to the nearest quarter acre (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b)),
6. No waste, spoils, solids, or fill of any kind shall be placed in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All
construction activities associated with this project shall meet, andlor exceed, those requirements
specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and
shall be conducted so that no violations of state water. quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
7. Sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the
Division of Land Resources has released the project.
8. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality. Please send
photographs of the upstream and downstream sides of each culvert site to document correct
installation, along with the Certificate of Completion form.
9. Continuing Compliance, The applicant (Crosland) shall conduct its activities in a manner so as not
to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with
section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal
law. If DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to
sustain a designated or achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further
conditions are necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to
include conditions appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in
accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d). Before codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the
applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any
new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in writing, shall be provided to the
United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued pursuant to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing, You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send
a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C, 27699-6714, This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
D. 124 }~~
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
David Caldwell, Mecklenburg, Water Quality
Central Files
Len Rindner
~~@illlnwm ~
JUN 7 ZOOS
IJLiil\ - WArEH CU,\LiTt ,
\','ETVJ;:;S mD STCi\!,I:iil,1E:H UJJ.CH
Triage Check List
Date:
5/4/05
Project Name: Ardrey Woods
DWQ#: 05-0739
County: Mecklenburg
To:
Alan Johnson, Mooresville Regional Office
60-day Processing Time: 5/3/05 to 7/1/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: (919) 733-9721
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
D Stream length impacted
D Stream determination
'Wetland deternlination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
D Minimization/avoidance issues
D Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
D Pond fill
D Mitigation Ratios
Ditching
D Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
D Check drawings for accuracy
D Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
D
D
D
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office, As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
Ardrey Woods
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County.
North Carolina
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentationfor
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
TO USACE alld NCDENR
Prepared For
Mr. Russell Rallsoll
Crosland
227 West Trade Street, Suite 800
Charlotte, NC 28202
Prepared By:
@&@&O~&P
MAY 3 . 2005 L
lien ~ENR . ~v.
"'v.t'DsANDS';:;~~ QUAL/l"v
. vro.flYA1r" ' r
. "lI BRAt '""
It..,
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904-2277
*Subject to verification by the USACE
April 30, 2005
Page 1 of9
~@i@@iUWI1l @
MAY 3 2005
Office Use Only: \' DENR. WATER QUALITY Form Version May 2002
l'ETUJiDSNJD STORJ..l'lVATER BRAt;.::/
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "NI A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit 0
o Section 10 Permit
X 401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
Isolated Wetland Permit DWQ
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is
not required, check here: 0
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: See Attached
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4),
and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: 0
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Mr. Russell Rallsoll
Crosland
227 West Trade Street, Suite 800
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 70456- 5219 Fax Number: 704-5275181
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must
be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Leonard S. Rindner. PWS
Company Affiliation: Environmental Planning Consultant
Mailing Address: 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews. NC 28105
Telephone Number: 704 904 2277
E-mail Address:lrindnerrmcarolina.rr.com
Fax Number: 7048470185
Page 2 of9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included, If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Ardrey Woods
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg County Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phasellot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
See attached location maps
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.03270N, 80.81600W (WGS84/NAD83)
USGS Weddington (Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately
lists the coordinates for each crossing ofa distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): + 59.15 Acres
7. Nearest body of water (streamlriver/sound/ocean/lake): UT of Six Mile Creek and Six
Mile Creek
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr,state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Undeveloped woodland in early to mid succession and
former agricultural.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Proposed residential development. Typical land development machinery
Page 3 of9
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Lot and site preparation and road crossing,
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ill Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Preliminary wetland and stream evaluation was conducted in conjunction with project 1Jlanning.
Two meeting: were held with the USACE verify the extent of the jurisdictional wetlands and
streams due to the unusual soil and site conditions. A meeting was also held with Alan Johnson
on April 1. 2005 to discuss project impacts and stormwater requirements. The application
reflects the preliminary discussions of these meetings
Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Additional impacts are not expected,
v. Proposed Impacts to Waters ofthe United StateslWaters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
to prepare development areas and for a road crossing.
Proposed impacts are necessary
Page 4 of9
2. Individually list wetland impacts below: NA
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type ofImpact. Impact 100-year Floodplain" Nearest Stream Type of Wetland...
(indicate on map) (acres) (ves/no) (linear feet)
1 NWP #39 0.47 ac no +/- 400' PSSINPFOIA
. List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts, Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditehing/drainage. ete, For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
.. 10o-Year floodplains are idcntified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps, Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://w\vw,fema,l!ov.
... List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e,g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc,) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only),
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.75 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.47 acre
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact. Impact Stream Name" of Stream Intennittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specifv)
.
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and nct loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, ete. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
.. Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps, If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
dO\\TIstream named stream into which it flows, USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wWW.USl!S.l!OV. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g" WWW.topozone.com.
www.mapqucst.com. etc,),
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:~
Page 5 of9
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: N/A
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Water body Type of Water body
Site Number Type of Impact. Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) (if applicable) bay, ocean, etc,)
.
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts, Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage. bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): D uplands 0 stream 0 wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., darn/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stonnwater requirement, etc,):
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VI. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
fmandal viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The project has been planned to preserve a significant forested buffer and wetlands within the
Six Mile Creek floodplain. Impacts to wetlands are required to prepare development areas and
correct soil conditions. as well as for economic feasibility in relation to the cost of the land, The
existence of this wetland area proposed to be impacted mav be related to or significantly
influenced by the discharge from an excavated pond fed by a well adjacent to the proiect area.
Based on discussions with the USACE and the NCDENR. mitigation was considered to be an
option in lieu of preservation of this wetland area. The remaining wetlands are preserved in
restricted common open space.
Page 6 of9
Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with l5A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h20.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ strmgi de ,htm I.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2, Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
(919) 733-5208 to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP web site at http://h2o.enr.state,nc.us/wro/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): .50 acres @ 2:l/USACE
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 7 of9
VII. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) NA
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes 0 No X
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEP NSEP A)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEP NSEP A document is required, call the SEP A
coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes D No 0
If yes, has the document review been fmalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes 0 No 0
VIII. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) NA
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to detennine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes 0 No 0 If you answered "yes", provide the following infonnation:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone. Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
.
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (Le., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration I Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate infonnation as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or ,0260.
Page 80f9
IX. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Based on an analysis by the project engineer (see attached) of the development area (excluding the
floodplain) the impervious area is proposed to be less than 30%, Stormwater will be discharged into the
large floodplain into plunge pools or similar devices in order to significantly reduce velocity and to
allow diffusion into the floodplain. Since Six Mile Creek has a substantial riparian berm, it is expected
that wetland areas may with the additional stormwater input.
x. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal Svstem- CMU
XI. Violations (required by DWQ) NA
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes 0 No X
Is tltis an after-tlte-fact permit application?
Yes 0 No X
XII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e,g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened S cies, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Dat
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of9
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map
Page 1 of 1
;.-l
/1
----
" .
\ '.
\ ".
~ \~
i ''-,.. \,c'~
'. '. ",.,;a. .
'. '- 'l:t;t.
'.,:--":' f!>
..-"..................
60(} ',~,
"'"
,...,
~~... /
)t-~-:;... ,/
.I ....~~..~"';r.'~
( '~'''""l
\ / /0- ~);.
-\, ,. \: --{ ;;:','
1/
-- ~9
{i3Ii'i 1'..
_~_~'ii-~.i'~{,
~_._\ ""i:.....
I. ' ...~~.;:;::~ I" _' .." \
.-----~/'.-'.'.I ~
/ " . " I'
~ :-.:\.'/ .. 'j I, "
.~".~_..
..... .--
/~~\ (('.
r \\'\
) "~'\ \
, (--...~~
'u" r--:-............
I ) _ '"
.-. \ " ( (-",
,.., ....., ,-,;-" \ '\ \.
" ,-~., . '\'~
\( r \-'
.:~ \ '-
\ ,....\
\ .
I,
I. ..
. /.
o
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5 krn
'"
M=-7.089
G=O.106
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 rni
Map center is 35.02370N, 80.81600W (WGS84jNAD83)
Weddington quadr~ngle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z= 17 &n=387 5686.00009089&e=516784&s=48&size...
4/23/2005
0,
.830ft
r~
0__
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS
.- . "''''''-'; ,-~-----..~--,
~
.,
~" f
NRCS SOIL SURVEY
~C~TI?\~T;7:~~~' -
~
. I..!
/ c,' _,- "r:c,~, :',. - :c!~i~'ll/ .. \)
/ '. : '--, i ! i. I : : ,--- '. i ~ \ /,-' ih\
1'>,1< ~S c _<~ ,< ,~_ ~ _<.~0.~ <~<;;::<;ir""'nlA~. ~'--~' 'I;.y ~ry v v · ~ I i~' J~~\\
.~ ,
-
-4; "}II 41
,,~ .-'.~.. ,.L, 1"'" ,..i... ,1-o...2l ~L I '.:j
/ /1,S 194 191 1112 191 . 190 I "",Ii .. - .-. .
., ... -=--~ "- ..
7'~~~S:~':~ ~"1~~'~> ~ 'd .~~1 7;; ~,~, ~.t~",.;':~.: ~.~~. "2~'!',a; '~lies;, #,//1 '.c~~~..'f..".
. , I &70. f' ' III il . '\ .~4 ~\\ Y , '::" l ~. -: _" ,I F! ~~. ,~"<J / , ."
;,' . '~' I~ ~ ~"~ ':;i~. ~'; 116 ~\il"""\m...>> ~ " .._ ",'c- .,', ~ Iii .... - It:'). :5j-S~ 1 ,,' '"
\ t.\~ I~\ "N:#1;?&3 A" l<:J.,' \ .,L.;....~ ~ ~"''"''~-.. .IJ~'" .", I ~ i'" .:"99. \ ;l I l .~ JJ"':>'
",[j,l, .' ::J~\ " '"(;::13...:.. \137., ~;..;r",. ~,c.~...' " ._.. .__ __,_ ... -- Ii" '" I ~,!i /u/
._,'~1 ~~;~,~ ~~ ,~~; '.;"\ l\l";::~~:\~~'~:':\ ':-. ,- ..'" '/ ~- - .- ~... .r:.. '~..': h~/ ~.~ <;.1
~ . "'.174ft., i-r..ot ~ iJ~~'-(;~''I~!l\ '\,..;;.~...~ -- ~ ' ,~61,r/A1 "1\ '~ 0:-~;'"
'~:~~;;":~~:':h'~' .YJ'tl~Y~'::' ,,::'::J1}~u~:.. ~~~I?;"";J ~~'\'~Il~l~;~~~~~,,~ ;''''J.)v?A. . /-i.~:~.t:- ' I /:(j~ ....,.~?:J;i
/J.'I'""c~" \111117t11"\I6'\~~\~~'~. \.' .Il'-....n."."_~~;., . .dA"\:.....; ; //,/'
:' ,"'" l"""'-j'~~' . :..-./. ,'~ ,121 ~ N III ." ..' '> -PO. ~'.it"/'... ~
\ )0 \ ' ~~t. ~\:....A.--'A ,,:'j 'rl ',.I(J" .; I . i ';..,... --- ~ / ~. , .' I \ ;"\~~ ;';,)/~ r . ~,.'-'=--~...~~.
'w.J..:J., "\iiiiil ;.I'-'~"., 1 \\...., <;'" '" ~ .J-' -- ,;.J.,:r "c i!if': I. '. ~ Ill) y.. ...y:.../J' , . .z/~'
\ ~f{~.~.,.~.. ~~~. /1"'67-: ~~. ';1; v~~.", ~ """', '.. '~'. ,',". '09 ,10' ,01 106 '0; I~"~'~-A I :.J.n8
, ';.., ~ .l.l. "".111' ,. " III 't. " -~ .,.~ \ I '~;';il)i
, " 110 . , ; f(\' ...... " '" , 1l7"c... r~'" 11. 1 ' ,~. ,J I,
7<r, 1~t1---:- 1&'_ :.:,' , "', \ ~" } ..' . ....:.. _ lU III II< '!~ . .c.... ......,... <
, " '" ,. ..... '.~ .........."It" OJ' .,' , -- ~ r~.' .. . ~ - .~
:IJI~ ~', ~'''~'1'' '.,_ ~{L ~"" . i~',,', l1 ;(t~x~"~~ ~.~ ~ .~:... ~ J ~"J\\,,"
II" '-;k..~~~, "-'~ . ,...&~ \~'\ ~..<:v..:-'..:..:~.. .. 't I ~t
~~ ",'ll ~~"r.l.. lrl..,' ~ !"\\I.Il\. .\J' '~ ...." 1\ .I:{
\ ~'" ~ 115 ,IS. "":-:-'r;.':". r' pTaialWcrl.od ~'\) ..;, .." -- '1 ~ :'(1
t/ ~'" .... . ' .53 151 ,-i O;-51lmpacr-o.o30Ac. /'~.. \ 14..... ' ' ....... 0
'- .... ...." L_ ~ ISI, .\i1~'" ~,~ . . ..
. """ ~ .:;:;:L-.:J~ .:?;'- ~)' \ ~ \'.~ \~,..~~. '. .': " :- :' - FORESTED PRESERVATION AREAS
I I.'. '" ~ ' --..c....:l--. .J; , \\~.~ 'P" :;...,r._
-,..../,../\ h' ' , - ....::;h~...:.,. ~'-'::IY ','" 1B . " ..~.~::.-
> . - - '~.x:' ;}i-i'; ".-
~~~ ~" \'~ \r~.~;~ -; c
FORESTED PRESERVATION AREAS
TURNBULL
. SIGMON
DESIGN
..
ust
'or .tIandJ
~ Impacted Wedands
D.,';j Wedands to Remain
\ - \
\ \\ \
Q9
:!:O.47 AC. WETLAND IMPACT
PROJECT NUMBER: 04-185
ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05
"9:; . . Tumbull Sif"'oo Cuign
'? 1001 Mo..h..d Squar.
! .. . Driv., Sui'" 530
" <. "",:: Charlot... NC28~03
';; ......" .' Phon.. 70".5~9.65oo
-":.. Fax, 70",5~~.088~
Crosland
DESIGNED BY:
Ardrey Woods
NO. DATE: BY: REVISIONS:
LAND DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN SERVICES
227 WEST TRACE ST
SUITE: 800
CHARLOTTE. NC
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan
1
SHEET NO
5
OF
~\
'1
1if l :
'.l!1':
~ \
~
. ~,
":., 1\
" ':.,\
, 't' ,~?~~
. -........:.~
,
II
i:
---....
'- I /'.~~ ~.:) : \.
,
, :/
':i"'. '.."..: .,. / .~
~ . I :\; { ,..;oJ, ~~.
PRO...lECT NUMBER: 04-185
Crosland
D Impacted Wetlands
r;.~D Wetlands to Remain
ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05
. '9"~'-' Turnbull Sigmon D...ign
.(J 1001 Morehe~d Square
.- "; Drive.. Su.ite 530
.' . ',.... Charlatte, NC 28203
(,.....",.,' , Phone, 704-.529,6500
'.<< .., F..., 701,522.0882
DESIGNED BY:
Ardrey Woods
LAND DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN SERVICES
227 WEST TRACE ST
SUITE: 800
CHARLOTTE:. NC
NO. DATE: BY: REVISIONS:
CITY OF" CHARLOTTE:
NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan
2 5
SHEET NO OF'
TURNBULL. SIGMON DESIGN
/
..YJ ~ .!J
195 194 193 192
v
L~.
I: .
,; \.--. -
00
i '__,:n;._,.. ----
,,:',;
-,'. 'w .
: +--... -.' -.\
, ,
- '~-,49 .
@_I __ --~
,
"
. '
-,- """
\
\
PROJECT NUMBER: 04-185
Crosland
~ Impacted Wetlands
P{l Wetlands to Rc:.main
ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05
/9....... Turnbull Sigmon Design
le; 1001 Morehead Square
" .; Drive. Suile 530
" · .'''.- Charlotte, NC 28203
< :'_ _.<,;'.' Phone, 70'~,529-6soo
_ ,... Fa%' 70~.522.o882
DESIGNED BY:
Ardrey Woods
NO. DATE: BY: REVISIONS:
LAND DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN SERVICES
227 WEST TRACE ST
SUITE 800
CHARLOTTE. NC
CITY OF' CHARLOTTE
NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan
3 5
SHEET NO OF
)
TURNBULL
..- J' ....... r;.
'; :.
.....! i I!
.~~9-M:qN .DESIGN
r"#/;
, ,c-. .-"
,j !I
i': 11
I "fi
-./
\ --....
:'
~
,~
,', \
. \
~\~
~
@
:
. ~.:~ --.-., -.'
.\
..'1
PROJECT NUMBER: 04-185
ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05
DESIGNED BY:
. ,;:9;':c.. Turnbull Sign>cn Design
,:,c, 1001 Morehead Square
i',. . '." Drive. Suite 530
.' . . . " ',' Charlotte, NC 28203
':,:' .. ,'. . Phone, 704.529.6500
'. _ ' Fu: 704.522.0882
Crosland
D Impacted Wetlands
Pi"U Wetlands to Remain
Ardrey Woods
NO, DATE: BY: REVISIONS:
LAND DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN SERVICES
227 WEST TRADE ST
SUITE 800
CHARLOTTE. NC
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan
4 5
SHEET NO OF
';\
I
/
\
TURNBULL . SIGMON DESIGN
I I;; I
\ , I
; II \.(
~\ :~I \~I
I!~ I
cP ~.~'<<';I
~.,
<'~<J I I I
\ \ I I
~ I I'
:, . ~;y) j . )
~ /
a.Jf / / ~ ,f'
~,~ / v
~ HI / -'l /.
i Iff:, /~/y;~ > \.
~~I\ //
~ ~~; en ~ ./ / ~ :/ . .
~ g: Cil e / / / j
~~: I.g~' /~/~ /r
: ;o~ ~/,
! I :2 ~ / / ..
I I .///.
I v--:'-/ /
: :f'/ /rL. .
I / /
I. / / I --....../
Exist
Wedands
~
25
26
~
g
i~ .... ---.~i _:-...:
, ,
;91: :i U '()Q ..
. "
61 ..
62\ I
\ '
'l, I,'
:1 r t ,! L ',11 l
T IK. . ~ '"' ._Ja: . " [jf: )"r.16: ! - r rnI -- r llll.
Ridgeforest Dr
'"
'" ,
~3"-: :~4 ", ':ID95 ..
, '
II i
'-1' ,.- "i :
_' ~__,.._ .___ L_._
/
@
c
..
'''U,'> ,'__'
0' .LJ!J'~ '-~=22
PROJECT NUMBER: 04-IB5
Crosland
D Impacted Wetlands
P::";:.:l Wetla.nds to Remain
ISSUE DATE: 4/25/05
"_g"'"'' Turnbull Silmon Dui&n
/i' 1001 Mor~h<&d S'Iuar<
;';. Drlvo, SUllO 530
, : .:: Cbarlo'te, NC~8~OJ
',:".,..,,,".,' Phone. 70i-.5~9.6soo
....<.,.. '. .' F... 70-\-.52~.0&&~
DESIGNED BY:
Ardrey Woods
NO. DATE: BY: RE:VISIONS;
LAND DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN SERVICES
227 WtST TRACt ST
SUITE: 800 CITY OF CHARLOTTE:
CHARLOTTE, NC NORTH CAROLINA Site Plan
5 5
5HE:ET NO OF
.. ... . .. ....... ........ .. ......~
TURNBULL. SIGMON DESIGN
<S>
Mr. Len RIndner
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
Subject: 30% Impervious Surface Calculations for Ardrey Woods Subdivision
Dear Mr. Rindner,
The following breakdown is for the maximum allowable impervious area for the Ardrey Woods
Subdivision in Charlotte, NC. Ardrey Woods is a resIdential single-family subdivision containing 196 lots on a
total of 59.51 acres. The following is a detailed breakdown of how the allowable impervious areas were
calculated:
Total Site Area 59.51 Acres
Less Community Encroachment (10,18) Acres
Flood Una
Net Site Area 49.33 Acres
Net Sauare FootaQe 2,148814 sa ft
30% Imoervious Allowable 644 644 sa ft
Less Developer Installed 208,503 sq ft Includes roads and
Imcervious Areas curb and Qutter
Remalnlna Impervious Area 436,141 soft
Total Lots 196
Impervious Area Allowed I Lot 2,225.2 sa ft
Note: The developer has not selected a specific homebuilder bullder or home style at this time. It is expected
that based on similar projects In the area In which 2,993 SF was allotted (Wynfield Forest) for 70' wide lots and 2.285 SF
was allotted for 50' and 60' lots (Brookmere), that the avemge available impervious area is a reasonable allowance per
lot At these other projects locations the actual bullt upon area was well short of the "allotment". The largest Ardrey
Woods lot Is 60' wide so it Is reasonable to conclude the homes will be smaller than those in Wynfield Forest and of
slmllar size to those in Brookmere.
Feel free to contact rne with any questions concerning the calculations above or if any further
infonnation is required for ~~(\~m~/1
..,...... ~\'\ CAROl ~ I",
.:0 O'('o~.~~ - -:.
Thank-you, S' (J' G~SSIO,l~"" ~
g ~~ ~) ~
() 4 = Q; SEAL ;
~~ : 23505 g
~ "P. ~~. ~~Q;.1. ~ f
-:,. ,~ R-~
Robert E Tripp. PE ~ ...",,,
Project Manager "'111 IIII~"'\\\\'
LanJ
IhvtIopmtnt
Duign &MJicu
1001 MQrthtad Si\larr Drivt
Suitt 530
Char/otu, NC 28203
Phon" 70~-529-6500
Far: 70f-522-088:z
tIImbullsigmon.coDl
IN 30%
ATTACHED IMPERVIOUS
FLOODPLAIN N
CALCULATI OT INCLUDED
ON-SEE
Areas rem d
ove from total site
INTO LARGE
L...f"L.--.J
o ~~
\J:J
.
,CroWnJ
. ~lGMUN DESIGN
LAND CE:VE:LOPME:N
T CE:SIGN SE:RVICE:S
~
Ardrey Woods
CITY O~ C
N HARLOTT~
ORTH CAROLINA
Impervious Ax
Calculations ea
Map
PROJE:CT NUMBE:R'
ISS . 04-165
UE: DATe: .. II 05
CE:SIGNeD BY: RE:T
NO. DATE.: BYI
RrYlSlONS:
1
aj::jfi"f"No
I
--or
LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
ProCessional Wetland Scientist
Land Planning
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
Tele: (704) 846-0461
Fax (704) 847-0185
April 24, 2005
Ms. Carol Shaw
NCDENR- North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Fax - 919.715.2219
Re: Ardrey Woods - Residential Development, Charlotte, Mecklenburg, NC
Crosland - Wetland Mitigation
Dear Carol:
On behalf of my client, Crosland, we are requesting acceptance to utilize the NCEEP to
meet mitigation requirements when the permits arc issued by the USACE and the
NCDWQ for wetland impacts due to the proposed development. Proposed wetland
impacts will require mitigation requirements for at least 0.50 acres of proposed wetland
impacts. The USACE may require a 2:1 ratio. The cataloging unit is 03050103 (Six
Mile Creek/Catawba Basin).
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.
Thank you for your consideration.
eonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
CC: Mr. Russell Ranson
Crosland
227 West Trade Street, Suite 800
Charlotte, NC 28202
. ll'l LiCU r CC .l~.rA~U.c,:).1 rv~vJ.
- ~o-
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM (revised 3/29/05)
Fill in information, print, sign, and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
1652, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptable to clarify information on the form.
1. Name of Applicant or Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Actent ·
2. Name of Business · Environmental Planning Consultant
.
3. Street Address · 3714 Spokeshave Lane
4. City I State, Zip · Matthews, NC 28105
5. Telephone · ( ~ ) 1904 _\2277
6. Fax (~) 847 - 0185
7. E-mail \Irindner@carolina.rr.com
8. Project Name · Ardrey Woods
9. Project Location · Charlotte, NC
10. Lat-Long Coordinates Lat 35.0237 North Long 80.8160 West
11. River BasIn · Catawba (Six Mile Creek)
12. Cataloging Unit (8-digit) 03050103
...
11. Project County. Mecklenburg ,j
14. Riparian Wetland 0.50 acre
lmoact (ac) ·
15. Non-Riparian Wetland NA-
Imoact (a c) ·
16. Coastal Marsh Impact AA-
(a c) ·
17. Stream-Cold Impact (ft) jJ.k
.
18. Stream-Cool Impact (ft) I-/,A
.
19. Stream-Warm Impact j-JA-
(ft) ·
20. .. Buffer-Zone 1 Impact f-J,br-
(SQ ft) ·
21. .. Buffer-Zone 2 Impact )-JJ::v
(sQ ft) ·
22. .. Buffer-Total (Zone 1 + fJ A-- /7
Zone 2) (sa ft) ·
Attachments? ~es Sig:~rAgent:
Date: ~
Lvt-lv-
"V' ~ ____
* Re uired information; zero answers iR'14-22 should De indicated with "0" or "N/A", not left blank.
q
.. Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba River Basins
and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed.
*** Go to EPA "Surf Your Watershed" !lttR:"cfpul>-,-~p~-,-9Q'!jsurflI9J~alelinde2<,cfm for CU determination.
Direct all questions to Carol Shaw at 919-733-5205 or g3[ol.'-sh~@IlGn]au.net
http://www.nceep.net/news/reports/forms/ILFform.htm
4/23/2005
rage 1 or i
Len Rindner
From: Carol Shaw [carol.shaw@ncmail.net]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:31 AM
To: Len Rindner
Subject: Re: ardrey woods
Yes, I did receive that request. I was out of the office Wednesday and Thursday. I will try to get the
reply out today, but it may be Monday.
Thanks,
Carol
Len Rindner wrote:
Carol:
Just wanted to confirm that you got the request for wetland mitigation from earlier in the week.
Thanks, Len
4/3012005
LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
ProCessional Wetland Scientist
Land Planning
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
Tele: (704) 846-0461
Fax (704) 847-0185
April 23, 2005
Ms. Amanda Jones
U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers - Reg. Field Office
151 Patton Avenue - Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006
He: Ardrev Woods + 60 Ac, Charlotte, NC
Dear Ms. Jones:
On behalf of my client, I am requesting written confinnation of the wetland/stream delineation for the
subject property.
Project Name:
Acreage:
City/County:
LonglLat:
Developer:
Ardrey Woods
:t 60 Acres
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
35.02370N, 80.81600W - Weddington
Mr. Russell Ranson
Crosland
227 West Trade Street, Suite 800
Charlotte, NC 28202
Contact: Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
General Wetland Classification and Deseription
The site is adjacent to the floodplain of Six Mile Creek in the Catawba River. Headwater wetlands occur
primarily downstream of a small pond ofT the property. The site also contains intennittent and perennial
tributaries streams and adjacent wetlands. Pockets of wetlands occur within the large floodplain. The site is
within a Water Classification - C watershed. The current land-use is fonner or current agricultural land and
woodland. The riparian wetland areas can be classified as Palustrine Broad Leaved, Scrub Shrub and
Emergent (PFOIA, PFOIC, PSSIA, PEMIC). The site includes Iredell and Monacan soils. These soils are
map units which may have inclusions of hydric soils according to the Natural Resource Conservation
Service, Technical Guide- Section II-A-2, June 1991.
if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you for your
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Professional Wetland Scientist
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: Holt Property Date: 11 /04
Applicant I Owner: Crosland County: Meek
Investigator: Len Rindner State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes-X- No_ Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes - No-X- Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes - No-X- PlotlD: -1
(explain on reverse if needed) sloping areas adj. to lOB"
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum T FAC 9. Fraxinus americana --I..- FACU
2. Liquidambar stvraciflua T FAC+ 10. Quercus phellos T FACW
3. Liriodendron tulipifera. T FAC 11. Ulmus americana --I..- FACW
4. Juniperus virginiana T F ACU- 12. Smilax rotundifolia -L- FAC
5. Comus florida T FACU 13. Toxidodendron radicans -H- FAC
6. Prunus serotina S FACU 14. -
7. Ulmus alata T F ACU- 15. -
8. Lonicera iaponica H FACU- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). >50%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greatcr than 50% of the Plant Spccics are/are not
Classificd as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Spccies that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken near
wetland area M
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
No Recorded Data Available
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
-X- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
NA (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
_ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_ Water-Stained Leaves
..lL. Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA.1ln.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: + 12"Jin.)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell Drainage Class: Well Drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes..lL No_
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
/Inches) Horizon (Munsell Molstl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A 10YR 5/3 4/2 Sandy clay loam
8-16 -1! 5YR 5/8 Sandy clay loam
dense clav
Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol - Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
-1L Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes -K.. No
Yes No ..2...
Yes No ..2...
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes_ No..lL
Remarks: Location (deseribe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Anny Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Somewhat poorly drained areas adjacent to wetlands (field verified by USACE on 3/8/05)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project I Site: Holt Prooerty Date: 11/04
Applicant I Owner: Crosland County: Meek
Investigator: Len Rindner State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Ycs--X- No - Community 10:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes_ No---X- Transect 10:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes - No---X- Plot 10: --2
(explain on reverse if needed) Wetland Area B .
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Fraxinus oennsylvanica T FACW 9. Juncus effusus H FACW
1. Acer rubrum T FAC 10. Carex sp H FACW
2. Liquidambar stvraciflua T FAC+ 11. Platanus occidental is T FACW
3. Salix nigra T OBL 12. Ligustrum sinensis S FAC
4. Ulmus americana T FACW 13. Toxidodendron radicans H FAC
G. Comus amomum S FACW 14. Juniperus virginiana S FACU-
7. Quercus phellos T FACW 15. Ulmus alata T FACU-
8. Camosis radicans S FAC 1G.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Prescnt Based Upon Greatcr than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
Wetland Area "HH"
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
No Recorded Data Available
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
-----x-Saturated in Upper 12"
-X Water Marks
--X- Drift lines
-----X- Sediment Deposits
--X- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
NA (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
--L Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
--X- Water-Stained Leaves
--X- Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: near surface J!n.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: less than 12" -<in.)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Iredell Drainage Class: PD
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Hydric Inclusion Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No-1L
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-6 A 10YR 5/2 I OYR 4/4 distinct - medium. sandy clay loam
I OYR 6/1 10 YR 4/4 distinct - medium sandy clay loam
6- 16 B 10YR 6/4 clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol ~ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime -1L-Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List
--X. Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETI-ANO DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes -1L No - Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -1L No - Within a Wetland? Yes-L No -
Hydric Soils Present? Yes -1L No -
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is Dot classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Anny Corns of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Wetland areas subject to high seasonal water table perched over dense clay layer.
""'''~'''b''. I \ ... . ''':J~''~ e ~
"-1> f,") / \ ~ ~
"'t.t- ~() / .
/
i
.i
lJ
,..,
~
.......)l>
"59
@ '-j~~ -^--
.. ME.GKLENBURG ~~ ~
,....,...!.I_.~ .... 0
ALL WETLANDS IN FORESTED AREAS.
WETLAND FLAGGING IS BLUE
Fl-10 Gl-6
~/)
Hl-9'/ \
\..
r
/ El-8
~
Q. 7.
,~ft
WETLAND SURVEY LOCATION MAP
~ov 23 04 08:048
RANSON
704-365-5649
LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS
Environmental PWming Coo.,wtant
Professional Wetland Scientist
Land PlaoniDg
3714 Spokeshave Lane
MaUhews, NC 28105
Tclc: (704) 846-{)461
Fax (704) H47-o185
November 22. 2004
Mr. Russell Ranson
Crosland
227 West Trade Street, Suite 800
Charlotte. NC 28202
Re: Wetland Consultation - Holt Property Tax Parcel 10 22937503 - Near Ardrey Kell
Road and Community House Road, Charlotte, NC - A2ent Authorization Letter
Dear Russell:
In order to interface with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources I will need your authorization. Please sign the
foUowing statement:
This letter authorizes Leonard S. Rindner, PWS as our firm's agent in matters relatetl
to Waters of the V.s. and Waters of North Carolina for the referencetl project site. TlIis
includes interfacing with the-.Vnr States Army Corps of Engineers and the North
carolin~;p' ertp;tN).' am esources.
~/~V~ I I
,/' 1/;"' .. -~ 11/;:i5/oY
Mr. Russell Ranson - Crosland Date
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additiolll11 explanation. Thank you
for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Leonard S. Rindne:r, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Profession Wetland Scientist
,
,,'
/
."
j~
t
i
i
!
, ,
',I
',j!
.'
8 North Carolina Wildlife Resources COlnmission ~
Richard B. Hamilton, Executivc Director
MEMORANDUl\l
FROM:
Cyndi B. Karoly, Supervisor
40 I Oversight and Exprcss Pcnnits Unit
NCDWQ Wetlands and Stonnwatcr Branch
.,:/,d
1':X:1
Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator /
Habitat Conservation Program
m&J@~UW@@
MAY ] G "01;5
TO:
". OpJH;,WATfrW0/'LllY
..~w.DJ/"O o TOi\MWATER C,V-J:Of
DATE:
May 13,2005
SUBJECT:
Review of an application Ardrcy Woods, Unnamcd Tributary Six Mile Crcck,
DWQOS0739, Mccklcnburg County
Thc applicant is rcqucsting 404 PCffilits from the US Army Corps of Enginecrs and a 401 Water Quality
Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed information
provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project
area. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clcan Water Act of 1977 (33
U,S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amcnded; 16 U.S.c.
661-667d).
The project is to develop woodland into a residential subdivision. Impacts are proposed to 0.47 acres of
wetlands, These impacts appcar to be associated with a road crossing and individual lot fill. Somc
wetlands are indicated to be preserved closer to Six Mile Crcek.
Based on our review of the project submittal, it appears that impacts for the roadway are not avoidable;
howcver, the lot fill does not appear to be nccessary or water dependcnt. Although we were not able to
visit the site and current site conditions are not known, we will not object to a 40 I water quality
certification or 404 pennit providing the following conditions arc implcmcntcd:
1. Wctland fill to make individual lots should not occur. Thcse areas can be integrated into
adjacent wetlands and maintained or restored to natural conditions for water quality and
habitat values \\hich will be diminished or destroyed through urbanization. TIlese arcas
should be preserved and protccted as common areas instead of being subdivided into
individual lots.
2, To the extcnt possiblc, unavoidable impacts should be mitigated on site by natural dcsign
(bioenginccring) stream relocation and/or with stoffil\\'ater managemcnt best managcment
practiccs that mimic cxisting hydrological conditions. Post development conditions should
Mailing Address: Division ofInland Fisherics . 1721 Mail Scrvice Ccntcr . Ralcigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: (919) 733-3633 . Fax: (919) 715-7643
/'
. Ardrey Woods
2
l\Iay 13,2005
roughly equal those conditions found on the site prior to development. Low Impact
Development (LID) techniques are encouraged and recommended for the site. Information
about LID site evaluation techniques and stonnwater measures and practices can be found at
\\\\\\ .10\\i 111 P:lctelcvc lopl11cn t .on~. Pollution controls and storm\vater management practices
for the site should adhere to all conditions specified in NCDWQ or USEPA stOfll1\\ater
permits,
3. Remaining jurisdietional waters should be permanently preserved with undisturbed forested
butTers of a width that meets the rccommendations (minimum of 50' for intermittent channels
and 100' for perennial channels) found in our Guidance Memorandum to Address
Cumulative Impacts to Address and Mitigate Secondary and Cumulative Impacts to Aquatic
and Terrestrial Wildlife Resources and Water Quality (August 2002) which can be found at:
h!!p:/ 1\\\\\\. nc\\i lei I i kOI"!'/p!107 \Vi lei Ii fcSpccicsC on/p'~ 7 c3 i 111j1:lcts. mlt'.
4. Whcre undisturbcd forestcd buffcrs, wetlands, and/or floodplains arc prescnt, permanent dccd
rcstrictions or conservation easements are reeommended. Where forested butTers are not
prescnt, they should be restored and preserved as undisturbed forested areas \\henever
practical. TIIese areas should be permanently protected just like stream buffers, Forested
areas and any preserved butTers should not be subdivided into smaller subdivisions or made
into portions of individual lots,
TIIank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336-769-9453.
Ce: Amanda Jones, USACOE
Alan Johnson, DWQ-MRO