Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
530002_PERMIT FILE_20171231
} [] DSWGi Anihi 4, Feetllot Operation Review a �£ r� 3 £`°' -,c" �s.,Y^ :' DWQAn�mal,� Feec!!ot OperationmS>Ite Inspection Date of ,Inspection ;.Time of Inspection Facility Y ,Number = 3 �D_ a C— x � Use 24 -hr tim,e< Farm Status: .................................... ....................................-- ❑ Routine -E3 Complaint ❑ F o l l o w - u p Farm Name :........... ��r�s.+_:..... ....4�4.'.'�.......... -�..'... Ms a�J...... ....r�*?............ ... ,. , . Count =-1................ y. '.f? Owner Name:................................................................. .... Phone No: Mailing Address: ,,,, ..... Onsite representative: ........................... ... Integrator: CertifiedOperator Name: .......... ................................................................. ................. ............................................... ...... .................................... .................. Location of Farm: _............................................................................. .......... ......................N........................................................................'.... .........:.................................... 1 1 �// i L/ 1 }P .... i.Pa M W .�.�jl..A. ...1 %1 ..¢R...X . ttl% %?O�L.4iNin �li.lp �"" "" l.......11..._�.�.�-FZ `.�u1� .�� `�..... �eJ 3 WAY t 4S YT Latitude �`���it Longitude 0 6 16 $j Not O erational Date Last Operated: ......................... ............................. _............................................................................... ....... Type of Operation and Design Capacity Srnrtne ;3 ; Y� a 2 „NUMb.e'r '.: a� QUltr}/ }, :.NUfYZi)ei' GaftlQ 1 e dumber Wean to Feeder Laver Dair Feeder to Finish Non -La er Beef Farrow to weant a k t ,� n Feeder��� � s y� Farrow to Finish 4 E3Other Type of Livestock ' '�3s5i,#? , k .. r h s r ? :, #-" .::?. i ,. ^' '. S,k : , ,'� i s g x3 + F os Number i7f L�`agoons ./� iyolding�Pands" 1 �' °�' ❑Subsurface Drains Present s��� yg °�� "��q',� "��"� ����� ����-- �°� � '��' x �' �} ❑Lagoon Area � ❑Spray Fteld Area General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ©No a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes R No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes '® No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes CR No 4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ER No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes �zNb maintenance/improvement? Continued on back 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Structures {Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds) - 9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑Yes ❑ No Freeboard (it): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 ..............�Ii .................................................. ............ 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWo) 13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15 Crop type :. n� �`.. .. .... .....� .. �1.....`... �....+,:'. +. `:a. :': +..v.. :�: { fi 6?, Do''thb 14 active. crops differ, with, those+designated +in+the Animal'.Waste''Management Plan? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ,® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No + ++ ❑Yes .'" ElNo ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Yes 0 No 19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No For Certified Facilities Only 20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes ❑ No 22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ % 23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No 24. Did Reviewer/Inspector tail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No R. .j -M k Y -_ 3 '� •Y'•�9 � a tip. £ `�.� � cy .# --: < #�, y ✓ T $ .,�} ., 'E t :� fk.+'� C � Ada � i �. MC .x �„#h Reviewer/Inspector Named K .W •< s a° Reviewer/Inspector Signatures { Dated cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96 0 Mate of North Carolina epartment of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Raleigh Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary Mr. Clay Ingram PO Box 2548 Sanford, NC 27330 e�� IDEEHNF;Z DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY January 27, 1996 Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Facility Number 53-2 Curly Tail Farm Lee County Dear Mr. Ingram: On January 24, 1997 Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems. The site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in compliance during this visit. This office has also received your request to be taken off the list of registered facilities with above 250 swine. Based on the compliance inspection, your facility does not have more than 250 swine at this facility and will no longer be inspected annually. Please note, if you increase animal population above 250 swine in the future, you will be required to again register your facility with the Division. Also, you must continue to manage your facility and wastewater so as to have no detrimental effect on the environment or surface waters of the State. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are the responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Water Quality is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan. 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX 919-571-4718 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609Nit' C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 1Tk post -consumer paper Mr. Clay Ingram January 27, 1997 Page Two The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspections please call Charles Alvarez at (919) 571-4700. Sincerely, �} • A/ AL*— Ju y E. Garrett Water Quality Supervisor c:\ingram.com cc: Lee County Soil and Water Conservation District Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation l \% " h ❑ DSWC Animal' Feedlo# Operat ilon �ReViewx ` } �.r^; r:q✓Y 5.+6 �-. s..�A ®DWI Q'Animal Feedlot Operation Site. lnspectiang. Date ,:of Inspection Time of Inspectton Factlliy Number 3 2 .00 use. za Fir time n 4 Farm Status: ........................................................................... ... ®Routine�'LE'Com taint ❑Follow-u A Farm Name County.: :........................ ................. :........... 6i't:. y.....:&.I...........� r...ft.................'--------...................... .� �....................... . 91� caner Name: ........ cl..%x ............ ............. -.......................................... .. Phone No ......... 7...7.t."..Yz.%.,$.7.............. Mailing Address: .......pP .... 8-ox....... 2.. _. ...................... .......................2..7.33D............................ Onsiterepresentative:......... .1!f...........r.rt.!...................... Integrator: . .................................................................................... CertifiedOperator Name: ............................................... ..... .... ... ................. ....... ........ ................. ........... L/cation of Farm: rP.xi........... ZrH..n )N'y......._.... . �r,..e............"I"J..........7F.....-q.. .........tx.t.t! .......al` _� ft.hr.'........ AW.... ".C.R........Coyir.1_e1s.I�., 4 tt,.- ) f ,y i ..r..}............ a ^4 .............I..�. �.4.:.L,!!....,...�.u.'.1.5.2................. ...............�t.1f..�!!.............1_e....f.............f�l.. �........��4 4......_..... .........., 3 Z i M r 1.re f Latitude Longitude 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:.............................................................................................................................................. .14 Type of Operation and Design Capacity Feeder to Finish to Fi -Laver [I Other Type of Livestock Number^�ofLagoans�/� Iioldittg�Pi�nds't � ti, OSubs�rface Drarns Present ,k,,, 5 - Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area -enerai. . .'_ ^�+ d' 7II"A r_ 5C" 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4, Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of'the,.State other. thanwfrom a,discharge? S. Does\,any pari,of the waste management system (ot_her than lagoons/holding ponds) require ' maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes S No Cl Yes ®,No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes f to ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No Continued on back 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes �jNo 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes N No Structures (Laaoons and/or Noldinq Ponds 9. Is structural 'freeboard less than adequate; .`� �' `�' ❑ Yes No Freeboard" (ft): Lag000n• 1+ & Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 ............I�.7. ........ ,..........•...................... ....................... .......... ................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? y 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? -�<•• 12yDo any ' of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (if any of questions ,9-12 was answered yes, and the situa#ion poses ,an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWO) 13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify -start. and stop ; ' mping levels? Waste Application lY ii 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) c, . ll t� : , ^ . .•1 . a c5 r' t� E:`1 i` cj '; 'J , 15. C-roprtYPe ~'.; F� C,.!sr............:. ... - .. ' ....... ��.... .. 16 'tDo%the active -props differ with those:designated,in the Animal Waste Management Plan? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the cover crop need improvement? 19, Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? For Certified Facilities Onl 20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal ,Waste Management Plan in any way? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? 23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes 15 No IS Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes &I No rt 4 �❑ Yes���❑ No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes, -.[] No ❑ Yes ❑ No l S QNA 1 G lY: y'0'af Li, 14 �[.1cs 4 a 3 v..`Fc-may'µ�, ^i 3 �• ^cyf W X /,r ""vY � l "Y Y� f .Y _ L .` e ReVlwer1InSpector `Signature rz{„ K% A ± a ':g ate cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Raleigh Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager Mr. Clay Ingram P.O. Box 2548 Sanford, NC 27330 Subject: Dear Mr. Ingram: DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT August 7, 1995 Compliance Inspection Ingram Swine Operation Lee County On July 12, 1995, Mr.. Ted Cashion from this office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with waste disposal systems. Mr. Cashion's site visit determined that wastewater from this facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the State. Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed. Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State. This office also reminds you that, if not already accomplished, an approved animal waste management plan must be incorporated by December 1997. This plan must be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection please call Mr. Cashion at 919-571-4700. Sincerely, d Garrett r y r_e_t Regional Water Quality Supervisor cc: Lee County Health Department Lee County Soil and water Conservation District Facilities Assessmenz Unit h:\animal\ingram.ir.s 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone 919-571-4700 FAX 919-571-4718_ An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper I'UL-14-1595 15 : 2b PROrl DEN WHTEP OUPL (TY SECT (CN TO RRIJ P.02/02 Site Requires immediate A qcn dory Facility No. DIVISION OF EN-VIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT' ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA11ONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: J �.0 c� 1995 {{ Time: Farm Name/(Owner: di Mailing Address: p _ �P U o r n - o" County: L e e Integrator: —, - - T - Phone: I, On Site Representative: _ _..d—,Ik� 1K��e Phone: Physical Addre:ss/L4eation: Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: d S0 Number of Animals on Site. �'SO DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude: _ ' Longitude: Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the .An final Wasre Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of I loot -r- 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Oe or No Acrual Freeboard: Inches Vas any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(oWas any erosion obs=ved? Yes or 1 0 Is adequate land available for spray'.> es r No Is the cover crop adequate? Q3>r No Crop(s) being utilized: �a rAff k✓oop�f Does the facility meet SCS rnmi =i um setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? es No 100 Feet from Wells? es r No ar.irnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of tUSGS Flue Line Stream? Yes ofi a,ilmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Niap Blue Line? Yes GADO '= :3ni.rnal waste discharged into waters of the stare by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or other ;iTT1i?a,r man-made devices'. Yes nr -N If Yes. Please Explain. r11IC9 lsrr f:.i(ilAy Maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of nia.nure, land applicd- spray irrigated on specific acreage with cave r crop,)? Yes or& Additional Cornments: cc: Facility Assessment Unit 0" coo/ S ig-natul e t Use Attachrnents if Needed. R TOTAL P.02